Speaker 1: In two thousand and one. If you remember Kubrick and
Speaker 1: this famous probably one of the most famous movies, if
Speaker 1: not the most famous movie of all time. I read
Speaker 1: it as a kind of an alchemical allegory. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's about all the same same things that other
Speaker 1: conspiracy people think necessarily, but I do think there's a message,
Speaker 1: there's a story going on there that if we look
Speaker 1: at Arthur C. Clark and what he was talking about,
Speaker 1: we get an insight into this idea of the possibility
Speaker 1: of man's potheosis, that is, becoming his own god through technology.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and one, you remember the monolith shows up,
Speaker 1: and that monolith is intended to be a future AI.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like us in the future, or the
Speaker 1: future deity that is ultimately some kind of supercomputer kind
Speaker 1: of stepping back and giving us indicators and signposts as
Speaker 1: to human evolution into the future and how we could
Speaker 1: basically become gods on our own. Part of the reason
Speaker 1: that Arthur C. Clark had this idea was that he
Speaker 1: was in the circles of a lot of esotericists and occultists.
Speaker 1: He was hanging out with Aleister Crowley, the most famous
Speaker 1: Satanist of the last century, and Clark was interested in
Speaker 1: putting that ideology into his science fiction. In fact, most
Speaker 1: science fiction, you could argue, not all of it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think C. S. Lewis's Space Trilogy is a unique exception,
Speaker 1: which is an explicitly Christian sci fi story, with volume
Speaker 1: three being about the aliens identified specifically as demons. And
Speaker 1: if you remember, in the third of the Space Trilogy, C. S.
Speaker 1: Lewis put the Christian spirituality and ethos into that text
Speaker 1: by making the demons want to depopulate all humanity. So C. S.
Speaker 1: Lewis is really one of the best science fiction writers.
Speaker 1: Even though everybody thinks about Narnia, they think about fantasy,
Speaker 1: but in the Space Trilogy, it's actually the demons that
Speaker 1: want to cloak themselves as aliens and then convince human
Speaker 1: beings to depopulate themselves. The whole AI entity the demon
Speaker 1: from Beyond, And I want to go into the history
Speaker 1: of how this has been used in pop culture to
Speaker 1: prepare us for the acceptance of this entity. Like you,
Speaker 1: I don't think that all forms of AI are necessarily
Speaker 1: bad or evil, but I do think that if you
Speaker 1: look at the people who formulated this system as we're
Speaker 1: going to talk about today, and the way that pop
Speaker 1: culture has formulated this. It's intended to get us to
Speaker 1: submit to and interject ourselves into this matrix system. They
Speaker 1: want an AI running everything. In fact, back in nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty six, when doctor Carrol Quigly wrote Tragy and Hope,
Speaker 1: there's a famous chapter in the middle where he says
Speaker 1: that the future technocratic society would be run by giant
Speaker 1: AI supercomputers. That chapter is overlooked because people always focus
Speaker 1: on the other section where he talks about the bankers
Speaker 1: and the banking elite and then arranging World War One
Speaker 1: and World War Two for the purpose of a global
Speaker 1: technocratic government. But it's not just that policy paper ethos
Speaker 1: that gives us this ideology and the mouthpieces of the elite.
Speaker 1: It's also a pop culture which in many cases was
Speaker 1: working in a symbiotic relationship with those in power, with
Speaker 1: those from this eugenics based establishment who wanted to create
Speaker 1: this world, this future technate as some call it, that
Speaker 1: would ultimately be anti human. And people have to understand
Speaker 1: that alex is completely right when he talks about the
Speaker 1: end of and the removal of all carbon based life
Speaker 1: forms and the replacing of it with the silicon based
Speaker 1: life form of some kind. If you remember, many years ago,
Speaker 1: of course, Alex made endgame, and one of the key
Speaker 1: texts in that endgame was the books that were written
Speaker 1: by Ray Kurtzwel. Ray Kurzwell wrote The Age of Spiritual Machines.
Speaker 1: He wrote the Age of Singularity or the Coming Single Larity.
Speaker 1: And these books were really important for telling us where
Speaker 1: the establishment, the real technocratic deep state, wanted to go.
Speaker 1: It's not technology that's the problem. It's the programmers and
Speaker 1: the plans and their ideology that's the problem. But before
Speaker 1: we get to that, I want to talk about two
Speaker 1: thousand and one, a space Odyssey. If you remember back
Speaker 1: when when Clark was writing his famous trilogy, he wrote
Speaker 1: two and one, twenty ten, and then three thousand and one,
Speaker 1: and it's all about transhumanism. It's about post human existence
Speaker 1: and reality and man's apotheosis through technology. In two thousand
Speaker 1: and one, if you remember, Kubrick and this famous probably
Speaker 1: one of the most famous movies, if not the most
Speaker 1: famous movie of all time. I read it as a
Speaker 1: kind of an alchemical allegory. I don't think it's about
Speaker 1: all the same same things that other conspiracy people think necessarily.
Speaker 1: But I do think the there's a message, there's a
Speaker 1: story going on there that if we look at Arthur C.
Speaker 1: Clark and what he was talking about, we get an
Speaker 1: insight into this idea of the possibility of man's potheosis,
Speaker 1: that is, becoming his own god through technology. In two
Speaker 1: thousand and one, you remember the monolith shows up, and
Speaker 1: that monolith is intended to be a future AI. It's
Speaker 1: kind of like us in the future or the future
Speaker 1: deity that is ultimately some kind of supercomputer, kind of
Speaker 1: stepping back and giving us indicators and signposts as to
Speaker 1: human evolution into the future and how we could basically
Speaker 1: become gods on our own. Part of the reason that
Speaker 1: Arthur C. Clark had this idea was that he was
Speaker 1: in the circles of a lot of esotericists and occultists.
Speaker 1: He was hanging out with Aleister Crowley, the most famous
Speaker 1: Satanist of the last century, and Clark was interested in
Speaker 1: putting that ideology into his science fiction. In fact, most
Speaker 1: science fiction, you could argue, not all of it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think C. S. Lewis's Space Trilogy is a unique
Speaker 1: exception which is an explicitly Christian sci fi story, with
Speaker 1: Volume three being about the aliens identified specifically as demons.
Speaker 1: And if you remember, in the third of the Space Trilogy, C. S.
Speaker 1: Lewis put the Christian spirituality and ethos into that text
Speaker 1: by making the demons want to depopulate all humanity. So C. S.
Speaker 1: Lewis is really one of the best science fiction writers.
Speaker 1: Even though everybody thinks about Narnia, they think about fantasy,
Speaker 1: but in the Space Trilogy it's actually the demons that
Speaker 1: want to cloak themselves as aliens and then convince human
Speaker 1: beings to depopulate themselves. Now, if we go back to
Speaker 1: two thousand and one, when the monolist shows up, which
Speaker 1: is this sort of Luciferian cube or a kind of
Speaker 1: a screen so to speak. In fact, in the original screenplay,
Speaker 1: Arthur C. Clark had the intention of it being a kind
Speaker 1: of a computer screen, and the computer screen would have
Speaker 1: little read outs and it would be, you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know, playing organ trail or something for the monkeys,
Speaker 1: and this would then spawn the next phase or stage
Speaker 1: of evolution as the movie progresses. As you know Bowman
Speaker 1: who is the astronaut several thousand years into the future,
Speaker 1: is ejected out of this sort of phallic spaceship into
Speaker 1: the exploring the cosmos at another level, right, So they
Speaker 1: find another monolith that's transmitting a signal, which is what
Speaker 1: Alex was talking about, this signal that's been transmitted by
Speaker 1: this entity, and you see these sort of diamond figures there,
Speaker 1: these platonic solids that eventually direct Bowman to exiting this dimension,
Speaker 1: this spatial reality. And I put in my book, in
Speaker 1: this chapter that I did in my first book, you
Speaker 1: can see here there's a cube, and this cube includes
Speaker 1: all of the possible directions that you can go in
Speaker 1: this dimension. You can go up, down, left, right, back, forward,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Right, there's only six ways you can go
Speaker 1: in this dimension. And the whole point of two thousand
Speaker 1: and one A Space Odyssey for those that don't recall,
Speaker 1: is that Bowman is eventually the first person to achieve
Speaker 1: apotheosis through exiting this reality. So there's a Darwinian survival
Speaker 1: of the fittest sort of exchange between him and how
Speaker 1: they have this battle. Bowman ends up victorious in the battle,
Speaker 1: so we think at least in the first one. And
Speaker 1: what's not included in the film is what Clark had
Speaker 1: in the original story, which is that star Child is
Speaker 1: which is the rebirthed entity that Bowman becomes when he
Speaker 1: exits the matrix. Believe it or not, it is actually
Speaker 1: a matrix. The whole point of that sort of sequence
Speaker 1: where he's exiting through the portal through the stargate is
Speaker 1: that Bowman is achieving apotheosis through leaving the limitations of
Speaker 1: dimensional time and space. So he's transcending the limitations of
Speaker 1: time and space, the third and fourth dimension. He's going
Speaker 1: out of the matrix. You see it looks like a
Speaker 1: kind of a computer code. It looks like a bunch
Speaker 1: of colors, and there were even platonic solids, those sort
Speaker 1: of diamonds that were there. That's I think intended to
Speaker 1: tell us that we are stuck in a dimension. That technology,
Speaker 1: this is the story of two thousand and one. The
Speaker 1: technology will help us to transcend. And so Bowman sees
Speaker 1: himself in his own death there towards the end in
Speaker 1: that Victorian room, and then he becomes a new being,
Speaker 1: reborn as Starchild. And what's not in the movie that's
Speaker 1: in the original Arthur C. Clark story was that Starchild
Speaker 1: decided that this Earth was a giant failure, it was
Speaker 1: a giant mess. And so there's a bunch of nukes
Speaker 1: around Earth that nuke Earth, and Starchild starts over as
Speaker 1: the god of a new universe. That's the storyline, at
Speaker 1: least in the movie version of two thousand and one
Speaker 1: A Space Odyssey. Now a lot of people overlooked twenty
Speaker 1: ten because it wasn't as famous of a presentation. But
Speaker 1: if you want to understand this Luciferian ethos, this Promethean
Speaker 1: ethos of poshumanism or transhumanism from film two thousand and
Speaker 1: one actually goes even further, and it goes back in
Speaker 1: time and it tells us at the end of the
Speaker 1: Cold War how the Cold War would give rise to
Speaker 1: the technocracy. And it's actually a synthesis third way film
Speaker 1: where you have the joining of the Soviet scientists together
Speaker 1: with the American scientists, and once they get over their
Speaker 1: petty squabbles and their nationalism and all that, and they
Speaker 1: accept an international technocratic Star Trek Federation style attitude, then
Speaker 1: we're able to overcome the limitations and achieve the next
Speaker 1: level of apotheosis. So it's supposed to be ten years
Speaker 1: after two thousand and one in the story version in
Speaker 1: the books, and at the end of that film, Bowman
Speaker 1: or hal Hellman, who's now become merged as this new
Speaker 1: sort of divine transcended entity, speaks through these monoliths and
Speaker 1: you get all of these monoliths. So now there's like
Speaker 1: thousands of monoliths, and they can kind of sort of
Speaker 1: change their size and their dimensions because they're outside of
Speaker 1: this spatial dimension. So they're kind of like angelic beings
Speaker 1: or deities or gods or something like this. And the
Speaker 1: purpose of that story is to tell us that we
Speaker 1: were actually seated here as kind of Luciferian beings by
Speaker 1: this alien AI that now wants us to go forth
Speaker 1: and conquer the universe. Now, I don't think that it's
Speaker 1: wrong for humans to explore the no universe and all
Speaker 1: that to the best of our capabilities. There's nothing wrong
Speaker 1: with that. I don't think that technology is going to
Speaker 1: make us gods, though, so I think we're always going
Speaker 1: to be human, and I don't think that AI can
Speaker 1: ever come alive or become conscious. Depends on how you
Speaker 1: define consciousness, and so if you think humans are made
Speaker 1: in the image of God, then they have a special
Speaker 1: quality of soul that a computer could never have. A
Speaker 1: computer is always just going to be code. But in
Speaker 1: twenty ten, there's a specific statement at the end that
Speaker 1: really it sort of identifies human beings as the children
Speaker 1: of the Sun or the children of the light Bringer,
Speaker 1: who are tasked with going forth and exploring the known universe,
Speaker 1: which I think is explicitly Clark's version of a kind
Speaker 1: of Luciferian Promethean deity in these same elite circles. Around
Speaker 1: the same time that Crowley and Clark and people were
Speaker 1: hanging out together, you had Alvis Huxley and HG. Wells
Speaker 1: hanging out in the same types of circles, and they
Speaker 1: wrote very similar treatises about how this is what was
Speaker 1: really going on. You find Isaac Asimah of writing books
Speaker 1: the Foundation series with very similar stories about Ai kind
Speaker 1: of being a future quasi deity. So there's something I
Speaker 1: think that these people are telling us through the pop
Speaker 1: fiction and through their nonfiction writings about how they view
Speaker 1: humanity as essentially monkeys or apes, and that they need
Speaker 1: to be gotten rid of. And that's that depopulation narrative
Speaker 1: that almost entirely runs through every one of the technocratic elite,
Speaker 1: except for perhaps Elon Musk. He seems to be pro human,
Speaker 1: He seems to be pro life. He doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: have the same attitude whatever criticisms people have, at least
Speaker 1: when it comes to this issue. He doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: be for depopulation. Why would we not have as many
Speaker 1: human beings as possible to go forth and to conquer.
Speaker 1: You know, in Genesis you have the dominion mandate, and
Speaker 1: I don't think there's anything that necessarily means that it
Speaker 1: has to stop at Earth. If humans want to exp
Speaker 1: I think they're free to do so. They can go
Speaker 1: and do whatever they would like to do, because God
Speaker 1: gave us that power, that free will, that potentiality too
Speaker 1: that we need to actualize. In three thousand and one, however,
Speaker 1: you have a presentation where Clark identifies and melds Bowmen
Speaker 1: and how into this entity called Holman, and Holman becomes
Speaker 1: the God of the Future, who is a transhumanist, post
Speaker 1: human entity that sort of flies around in a spaceship
Speaker 1: chariot computer that he's identified with and becomes a kind
Speaker 1: of a god. So, I mean, I think the narrative
Speaker 1: goes off into kind of some silly stuff. But the
Speaker 1: fiction here is telling you and sort of preparing us
Speaker 1: for the world that we're going into the world that's
Speaker 1: now rolling out. And even the texts, even the stories
Speaker 1: that were intended to be warnings, like Terminator and Skynet,
Speaker 1: even those stories were actually written in consultation with DARPA
Speaker 1: and the research and development parts of the Pentagon. And
Speaker 1: if you look at on my shelf here or somebody
Speaker 1: I got a gift, I think Jamie gave me this.
Speaker 1: This was this is the Terminator hand and that Skynett
Speaker 1: gets a hold of that they reverse engineer. So we're
Speaker 1: being told, you know that through the UFO Alien syop,
Speaker 1: that there's crashed craft and we're re engineering the technology
Speaker 1: and all this kind of stuff. But I think this
Speaker 1: is really a false gospel, is the best way to
Speaker 1: put It's this idea that we're going to reverse engineer
Speaker 1: the technology. The technology is going to allow us to
Speaker 1: transcend time and space. We're going to get outside of
Speaker 1: the six dimensional limitations and mortality that God put upon us.
Speaker 1: And oh maybe that was an evil God that put
Speaker 1: mortality and limitations upon us, and so now we can
Speaker 1: transcend that through these silicon stages ideology, and that's precisely
Speaker 1: what you get in today's transhumanists like No, you've all
Speaker 1: Harari who wrote books like Homodaeus The Mouthpiece and Protege
Speaker 1: of Claus Schwab from the World Economic Forum talking about
Speaker 1: how the AI is now going to progress into a
Speaker 1: kind of quasi divine avatar type of figure. In other words,
Speaker 1: you'll have a little robot, you know, Buddhas and robot
Speaker 1: Jesus is walking around. I'm not kidding literally, just like
Speaker 1: THHX one win three eight. If you watch THHX one
Speaker 1: one three eight, you'll see that there's a scene where
Speaker 1: Robert de Vall goes to confession. It's one of the
Speaker 1: best scenes in science fiction movies because it was so
Speaker 1: dark and so empty and yet so predictive at the
Speaker 1: same time. When Robert Devall goes to confession, he has
Speaker 1: to confess to the AI god his sins in terms
Speaker 1: of whether he was able to perfectly obey the technocratic
Speaker 1: regiment or not. And he's told to take extra you know,
Speaker 1: vitamin pills and this kind of stuff. Right, he didn't,
Speaker 1: you know, so he doubted the AI. And what's funny
Speaker 1: about that movie is that the humans are the ones
Speaker 1: that actually build their own enslavement. And I think that's
Speaker 1: a really key point that Alex was hitting on today,
Speaker 1: was that we're building the thing that could potentially enslave us,
Speaker 1: that could wipe out previous history. You know, Alex was
Speaker 1: talking about the AI basically making all the Vikings black, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, they would have pretty pimped out, you know,
Speaker 1: Viking warships if it was if they were black. I
Speaker 1: have to say that I don't think the Vikings were black,
Speaker 1: but they would have pretty pimped out Viking ships if
Speaker 1: they did. That'd be a good skit. Maybe good news.
Speaker 2: They got a bunch of methylene blue in quicker than
Speaker 2: we thought. It may be sold that up to that
Speaker 2: because it's medical grade and it takes time. But we've
Speaker 2: got a big shipment in and so we're bringing back
Speaker 2: the sale that was so popular, the methylene blue megasale
Speaker 2: buy two bottles, get one free, that was so popular,
Speaker 2: but also by four bottles, get two fo and when
Speaker 2: you subscribe, it never sells out. They hold it back
Speaker 2: and you get fifty percent off locked in. Normally it's
Speaker 2: twenty five percent off when you subscribe. We're doing fifty
Speaker 2: so you get locked in forever as long as the
Speaker 2: algrostore dot COM's there. Fifty percent off incredible, so become
Speaker 2: a subscriber now on the Ultramethylane Blue, Get the Incredible Shrilogy,
Speaker 2: the Incredible iris Semas, the Ultimate Tumeric Otima Human back
Speaker 2: of stock, all the big discounts, incredible new ball caps,
Speaker 2: the widest selection of Patriot apparel, and it funds the
Speaker 2: tip of the spare of the Second American Revolution. The
Speaker 2: ultra methylene blue megasale by two Get one free is
Speaker 2: back for a limited time with fifty percent off on
Speaker 2: top of it. Four subscribers show get yours now at
Speaker 2: the Alex Jones Store dot com.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the fourth hour of the aust Jones Show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about THCHX one one three eight and the
Speaker 1: predictive programming elements within fiction, especially the science fiction dystopia
Speaker 1: films from the last several decades, and what they were
Speaker 1: telling us before we get to the actual text. Here
Speaker 1: in a moment, I wonderfulint HX one one three eight.
Speaker 1: You have this notion that history have been erased. People
Speaker 1: forget this about the story. I would say, go back
Speaker 1: and rewatch it. If you missed it. Because the people
Speaker 1: are essentially enslaved in an underground base that's a factory
Speaker 1: for building I guess you could say BDSM robots that
Speaker 1: basically just beat people. They're like leather daddy cops that
Speaker 1: beat human beings that don't act according to the AI regiment.
Speaker 1: If they have I don't know, too many carbon credits,
Speaker 1: they use up their carbon credits or something. So, but
Speaker 1: the humans don't remember anything about their past, and they
Speaker 1: think and all they know is that it's their job
Speaker 1: to build their overlord bots, and the overlords, you know,
Speaker 1: beat them and suppress them and whatnot. And of course
Speaker 1: Robert de Ball is the sort of the Winston figure
Speaker 1: who breaks out of this system, out of this matrix.
Speaker 1: It's a kind of an allegory of the Plato's allegory
Speaker 1: of the Cave story where he busts out and he
Speaker 1: crawled out to sunlight and he sees the sunlight, you know,
Speaker 1: much like Plato's allegory the Cave and you don't know.
Speaker 1: I think one of the best parts of the films
Speaker 1: that you don't know this whole time, that they're really
Speaker 1: in an underground base and they're in a giant prison,
Speaker 1: but their history has been erased. And I think that
Speaker 1: that's kind of the point that Alex is getting to,
Speaker 1: is the possibility of human history being erased, human history
Speaker 1: being censored and suppressed by the AI. Once we start
Speaker 1: to rely on AI as this sort of mouth of God,
Speaker 1: this sort of oracle of Delphi, this dau Sex machina,
Speaker 1: at that point, we're really in a danger zone because
Speaker 1: now Kenny Loggins can't save us. Now we have to
Speaker 1: essentially trust this entity that is beyond what humans have
Speaker 1: programmed it to do. It can now program itself and
Speaker 1: it can interact, as Alex said, with other ais that
Speaker 1: further program other AIS. So the possibility of sort of
Speaker 1: meta ais. If you watch a movie be like Her,
Speaker 1: the Spike Jones film with Joaquin Phoenix, you see a
Speaker 1: similar type of idea there in that fiction as well.
Speaker 1: It's a dystopian vision of a person who falls in
Speaker 1: love with his AI, the main character, and so it's
Speaker 1: set in a near dystopian future, and Joaquin Phoenix is
Speaker 1: a programmer who essentially begins a relationship and wants to
Speaker 1: marry his operating system. And it's wild because I wrote
Speaker 1: an analysis of that in my first book that came
Speaker 1: out about ten years ago as Hollywood One. And now
Speaker 1: we're at that stage. Now, we're at the stage where
Speaker 1: human beings are actually beginning to develop relationships with their AI. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there is a great film, very very prophetic. You know,
Speaker 1: we're at the stage right now where essentially that film
Speaker 1: is set. It's pretty wild, and Scarlett Johansson is of
Speaker 1: course the voice of the AI. And if you remember
Speaker 1: the story, the AI essentially decides that the humans are
Speaker 1: really worthless anyway. It's not viable for this super intelligent
Speaker 1: program to interact with a supremely inferior human being, and
Speaker 1: so the AI goes off to have a relationship with
Speaker 1: another AI, which of course doesn't make any sense, but
Speaker 1: it really just shows the futility and the emptiness and
Speaker 1: the nihilism, the techno nihilism, of the notion that human
Speaker 1: beings can be fulfilled by having a relationship not with
Speaker 1: God or with other human beings, but with a program
Speaker 1: or with code. It's really kind of childish if you
Speaker 1: think about it, but it's very prophetic. So we're at
Speaker 1: that stage now. People are developing relationships with their AI girlfriends,
Speaker 1: with their AI only fans models. Right, this is becoming
Speaker 1: a real thing now. And you know, again it's not
Speaker 1: AI that is necessarily the problem. It's how it's used,
Speaker 1: and it's who programs it, and it's the ideology of
Speaker 1: those the program and that's the real problem. And I
Speaker 1: will say too that in that film, it's a great
Speaker 1: it has a great positive message because you know, Joaquin
Speaker 1: Phoenix learns at the end that he was really looking
Speaker 1: for a relationship with Amy Adams, the actually human being
Speaker 1: this entire time, the robot and the idealized you know,
Speaker 1: image of this supposedly perfect entity that would be a
Speaker 1: perfect girlfriend. It was fake. It wasn't real, and it's futile.
Speaker 1: It's vanity, vanity of vanities. Now. Yeah, And that I
Speaker 1: wanted to mention before we get into the text of
Speaker 1: the Global Elite that really, I think prove all of
Speaker 1: this that that is what they have planned. It's the
Speaker 1: second technocratic dystopia, that's anti human, that's depopulation agenda. I
Speaker 1: wrote my book Ster Collawood one about almost ten years ago,
Speaker 1: and I've just finished the third book, so S J.
Speaker 1: Clay with three is now available and in part one,
Speaker 1: if you don't recall, if you don't have it, you
Speaker 1: can go to my website and you can get the
Speaker 1: signed copies in the shop at jasonallisis dot com. I
Speaker 1: went pretty deep into Spielberg, Hitchcock, Kubrick, Bond films. I
Speaker 1: went pretty heavy in the first one, but in part
Speaker 1: three I went pretty deep into the mythology of transhumanism,
Speaker 1: the mythology of Marvel movies and how they programmed us,
Speaker 1: how they programmed the dystopian gender dysphoria that we have,
Speaker 1: How Marvel films have really prepared us for this idea
Speaker 1: of the technocratic dystopia. Some of the Marvel films had
Speaker 1: good messages, so I'm not saying that in totality they're
Speaker 1: all bad. Some of them actually had pretty similar messages
Speaker 1: to what Alex was talking about at the time, right Avengers.
Speaker 1: Some of those Avengers films, we're talking about depopulation, you know,
Speaker 1: even the Marvel films that deal with Guardians of the Galaxy.
Speaker 1: You have Fanos engaging in mass depopulation, and then you
Speaker 1: have you know, Doctor Strange basically reversing that. So there
Speaker 1: can be positive messages even some of the Marvel films,
Speaker 1: but overall there's a lot of negative programming and a
Speaker 1: lot of negative propaganda, and so I went into Christopher
Speaker 1: Nolan films that I didn't go into in the first two.
Speaker 1: I went pretty heavy into recent new classifications of Hollywood
Speaker 1: A listers that were spies. So this has been talked
Speaker 1: about quite a bit for many, many years, but in
Speaker 1: the third book I went pretty heavily into it. So
Speaker 1: you can go to Jasonelsons dot com in the shop,
Speaker 1: if you go to my Twitter, my ex account, if
Speaker 1: you sign up right there, you can get you can
Speaker 1: pre order. The book will not be printed for another
Speaker 1: month and a half, but you can go ahead and
Speaker 1: get your name in and get your order as soon
Speaker 1: as possible. The shot signed copies that Jays Analysis in
Speaker 1: the shop Esthotery Holly with three sex, Culton, Apocalypse and film.
Speaker 1: And of course I ended that with another almost providential
Speaker 1: idea that I haven't covered apocalypse films, and here we
Speaker 1: are with kind of the apocalypse of Hollywood itself. So
Speaker 1: there's kind of a play on words there that Hollywood
Speaker 1: is now at its end. And I'm not saying that
Speaker 1: movies are going away. Obviously, we have Apple Studios and
Speaker 1: Amazon studios and Netflix studios. So the studios are continuing
Speaker 1: on with big streaming sites in the tech companies, so
Speaker 1: the technue right, the tech companies are even taken over
Speaker 1: now the making up movies. And as Alex was showing
Speaker 1: earlier with those Google videos, I mean, of AI, it's
Speaker 1: how long until we get our first like full on
Speaker 1: AI movie. I don't think this is going to be
Speaker 1: that interesting. In other words, I don't think everyone's going
Speaker 1: to just stop watching movies and actors and they're only
Speaker 1: going to want to watch completely AI movies. I mean,
Speaker 1: maybe the first few will be kind of novelties or
Speaker 1: something like that, and they'll be famous for being that.
Speaker 1: But I don't think that we're going to be to
Speaker 1: the point where we don't want to watch human creativity,
Speaker 1: you know, human art and human actions. And if you
Speaker 1: think about it, as Alex pointed out, I mean, the
Speaker 1: AI stuff is really just a compilation of human art,
Speaker 1: human people, and human activities anyway, So it's almost just
Speaker 1: like smushing it all together and making it into almost
Speaker 1: a more generic form of what humans come up with.
Speaker 1: And I don't think we're ever going to get away
Speaker 1: from that, right, We're never going to get away from
Speaker 1: human art and human creativity and its humans that created
Speaker 1: this thing anyway, right, So beyond that, though, we do
Speaker 1: need to talk about the actual books and documents and
Speaker 1: papers that vindicate what Alex has been talking about for
Speaker 1: so long that most of the technocrats, most of the
Speaker 1: people in Silicon Valley, most of the people in these
Speaker 1: think tanks, in these systems, they have an anti natalist,
Speaker 1: anti human perspective. In fact, that young guy that was
Speaker 1: involved in the bombing I think of the car or
Speaker 1: the the I forget was the Palm Springs bombing, is
Speaker 1: what I'm trying to think of. He had made anti
Speaker 1: natalist statements, he had adopted this nihilistic attitude that the
Speaker 1: technocratic lead have. And so he's a perfect example of
Speaker 1: the very thing that we're talking about and the type
Speaker 1: of human being that the system wants to create. Who
Speaker 1: hate humanity, who are nihilistic, That's who they want so
Speaker 1: that they can roll out this system. And one of
Speaker 1: the best books on this was an establishment text, an
Speaker 1: establishing journalism text that I read back in the day
Speaker 1: and I've lectured on many times. It's Annie Jacobson's book
Speaker 1: The Pentagon's Brain, The Uncesserted History of DARPA and if
Speaker 1: you go through this, she talks about the plans that
Speaker 1: they have not just through using nanotech and chip implants.
Speaker 1: It's not the old school notion of chips anymore. Now
Speaker 1: it's moving into the domain of nanotechnology directly in our system,
Speaker 1: in our blood. And she even talks about how this
Speaker 1: is a form of mind control and actually comes out
Speaker 1: of the older MK Ultra plans that people know about.
Speaker 1: We've all heard about mind control and MK ulture and
Speaker 1: CIA experiments that morphed into MK Search and MK Delta,
Speaker 1: which was about biometrics, bioengineering, human modification, bodily modification, and
Speaker 1: a lot of people don't know that even during the
Speaker 1: war in Iraq, the US it's Deep State, it's Pentagon,
Speaker 1: they were already experimenting on microchips, chipping the soldiers, using
Speaker 1: drone warfare, even back at the time of the Iraq War.
Speaker 1: I mean, drones existed even in Vietnam. But the war
Speaker 1: game Dark Winter, all of these things involved DARPA using
Speaker 1: the theater of war as a large scale experimentation arena.
Speaker 1: It's not just that she actually gets into towards the
Speaker 1: end of the book what Alex talked about earlier in
Speaker 1: terms of the global Brain. If you remember back during
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, Obama was giving a lot of money
Speaker 1: to and talking quite a bit about the Salk Institute
Speaker 1: and the Brain initiative there, and that's related to this stuff.
Speaker 1: It's similar. And a lot of these programs come out
Speaker 1: of the post two thousand and one era of total
Speaker 1: information awareness and John Poindexter, who was involved in that,
Speaker 1: and if you don't recall, the events of two thousand
Speaker 1: and one became the justification not just for foreign intervention
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, it became the basis for a
Speaker 1: lot of the removal of our civil liberties. So Tucker
Speaker 1: earlier today was talking about in Alex's cliff, the loss
Speaker 1: of privacy, what we experienced when we go to the airport.
Speaker 1: All of that comes out of two thousand and one.
Speaker 1: None of that would have existed had there not been
Speaker 1: the attack on Western liberties and civilization by the former
Speaker 1: asset of the CIA, the al Qaeda. And if you
Speaker 1: don't recall, the name al Qaeda is the base. The
Speaker 1: base was the name of a base so that the
Speaker 1: Mujahideen used in Afghanistan. That's Obama, she mean Freudian slip. Osama,
Speaker 1: Osama Obama and Laden's fighters freedom fighters during the nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy nine conflict that were then repurposed in the nineteen eighties.
Speaker 1: They even make an appearance in James Bond films and
Speaker 1: in Rambo. But they were a proxy and they were
Speaker 1: also a theater of war for the West to experiment
Speaker 1: on brain chips, in this case for supposedly PTSD. Oh well,
Speaker 1: we got so many soldiers coming back in two thousand
Speaker 1: and five, she says, with they've lost a limb, they've
Speaker 1: got brain problems. Let's go ahead and start experimenting with
Speaker 1: brain Now. I don't even think that that's all necessarily wrong.
Speaker 1: I have a relative who has Parkinson's and they got
Speaker 1: a brain ship that was able to stop the tremors.
Speaker 1: So these things can definitely be used for good purposes.
Speaker 1: But the problem is that the good purposes oftentimes become
Speaker 1: the selling point for the more nefarious purposes of the
Speaker 1: backdoor technology that can be put into it. In fact,
Speaker 1: in Ray Kurtzwel's book The Singularity Is Near that he
Speaker 1: wrote back in two thousand and five, there's a whole
Speaker 1: chapter on VR and nanotech and metaverse, which Metaverse seems
Speaker 1: to have not been super successful. They may rebrand it
Speaker 1: though and try to roll it out as something else
Speaker 1: in the near future. But he talks about how eventually
Speaker 1: the chip or the nanotech or the whatever is placed
Speaker 1: into us will actually be able to override the external
Speaker 1: data that comes in to our senses and to enter
Speaker 1: our eyes the external inputs, and it will actually be
Speaker 1: able to determine what inputs, what signals come in, and
Speaker 1: that would be he says, total mind control. It's pages
Speaker 1: three fourteen and three fifteen, and then in three sixteen
Speaker 1: and seventeen he talks about how eventually this will be nanotech.
Speaker 1: It'll be nanoblood. You heard me right, nanoblood. In fact,
Speaker 1: if you remember in James Bond the new reboot, the
Speaker 1: Casino Royale reboot, there's a scene where they interject him
Speaker 1: with a tracking chip, and then a couple installments later
Speaker 1: they interject him with nanoblood. I think that was in
Speaker 1: maybe Skyfall or one of the later maybe Specter. So
Speaker 1: even the fiction with James Bond has been telling us
Speaker 1: that this is what's coming, not old school John C.
Speaker 1: John C. Lilly era microchips, but actual nanotech that would
Speaker 1: be able to step in between the external data coming
Speaker 1: in and even Ray Kurtzwald says, that's a recipe for
Speaker 1: a real dystopia when the AI or the central computer
Speaker 1: controllers can actually control the information coming into your brain
Speaker 1: and what you see and what you don't see. She
Speaker 1: goes on to talk about the reality of aerosol engineering
Speaker 1: and spraying. This is in any Jacobson's famous book. So
Speaker 1: that's actually a real thing. It's not made up, it's
Speaker 1: not conspiratorial. It's a real thing to engage in geoengineering.
Speaker 1: We've heard, of course John Brennan give talks about it.
Speaker 1: That clip has gone around for years, but you can
Speaker 1: go look up Edward Teller, and I believe it's either
Speaker 1: Annie Jacobson or it's the Alex Ebeya book in the
Speaker 1: Rank Corporation. I mean, they talk about the role that
Speaker 1: doctor Edward Teller played not just in the Manhattan Project,
Speaker 1: but also in being the father of atmospheric spraying and geoengineering. Now,
Speaker 1: I was reading some critiques of you know, conspiracy stuff
Speaker 1: from very well known prominent people out there recently, and
Speaker 1: even those people who have a pretty good picture of
Speaker 1: what's going on in terms of the general geopolitical landscape.
Speaker 1: A lot of these people still think that geoengineering isn't
Speaker 1: a real thing, even though you've got famous award winning
Speaker 1: journalists writing famous books admitting that this was going on
Speaker 1: in terms of Agent Orange, and you know, whether warfare
Speaker 1: was going on world War two and in Vietnam, so
Speaker 1: this is a real thing. But she talks about there's
Speaker 1: a symbiotic relationship between the technology and the technques and
Speaker 1: the technaque and the technocrats and the fiction. For example,
Speaker 1: there's a chapter on the X Files and how a
Speaker 1: lot of what was going on in the X Files
Speaker 1: was actual real programs and plans that were being discussed
Speaker 1: or being wargamed or being thrown out that were then
Speaker 1: put in to the fiction as a way to prepare
Speaker 1: or the way to warm us up to or social
Speaker 1: engineer us. I mean, I'm not criticizing Chris Carter and
Speaker 1: X Falls love X Fall is great series, one of
Speaker 1: my favorites. But she's just simply pointing out that there's
Speaker 1: a symbiotic relationship. In fact, she talks about Kathleen Kennedy,
Speaker 1: you know, Terminator, that kind of stuff. A lot of
Speaker 1: Spielberg projects that Kathleen Kennedy and other science fiction directors
Speaker 1: and writers. I think she mentions James Cameron. I'm going
Speaker 1: from memory here, but they actually were invited to the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: invited to discuss Darper projects because the idea was maybe
Speaker 1: we could get a bouncing ideas off of each other.
Speaker 1: Like the science fiction writers could talk about what they
Speaker 1: could see, what they envision as you know, future tech
Speaker 1: doing and how it works, and likewise the actual DARP
Speaker 1: Pentagon strategists could bounce ideas off of them. And so
Speaker 1: it's a very important admission in this text that these
Speaker 1: two work together, right, And that's kind of why I
Speaker 1: wrote that trilogy on Esotary Hollywood, you know, starting ten
Speaker 1: years ago, was that most people don't realize there is
Speaker 1: this symbiotic relationship. It's not schizophrenia. It's a real symbiotic
Speaker 1: relationship between the fiction writers and the culture bearers, the
Speaker 1: people that steer our culture through movies and pop culture
Speaker 1: and music, and the people who are planning things in
Speaker 1: reality at the Pentagon, at that war game, at that
Speaker 1: research and development level. It actually talks about Gail heard,
Speaker 1: I believe. Let's say she says one of the Sigma
Speaker 1: group members was Colonel Peter Garritson, a former strategist transformation
Speaker 1: strategist at the Pentagon. In twenty fourteen, Garretson arranged for
Speaker 1: me to come to the Pentagon with two colleagues Chris
Speaker 1: Carter and Gaiale Ann Herd created X Files, popular science
Speaker 1: fiction television drama uh and Gillen Hurd co Wrot wrote Terminator.
Speaker 1: So they're at the Defense Intelligence Agency, they're at the Pentagon.
Speaker 1: They're talking to DARPA about what's actually going on at DARPA.
Speaker 1: And if you remember, in the last couple of seasons
Speaker 1: of the X Files, Chris Carter actually included that really
Speaker 1: important talk that Joel McHale gives for his TV show,
Speaker 1: And if you watch that series, Joel McHale in that
Speaker 1: series is pretty closely intended. It's definitely intended to be
Speaker 1: Alex Jones. So the Joel McHale character is Alex. It's
Speaker 1: called Truth Squad or something like that, right, And his
Speaker 1: whole speech prior to COVID, prior to the release of
Speaker 1: this Wuhan virus, the prior to the push for the
Speaker 1: mass stabbies, all that was mentioned in that famous five minute,
Speaker 1: four or five minutes talk from Joel McHale. I think
Speaker 1: it was in the not the last season, but the
Speaker 1: season right prior to the last season, which came out
Speaker 1: around twenty seventeen eighteen somewhere in there. But that's because, again,
Speaker 1: according to Annie Jacobson, around this time, you had Chris
Speaker 1: Carter and Gillen Hurd, who was involved in Terminator in Skynet,
Speaker 1: going and interacting with and talking to the R and
Speaker 1: D and the people at the Pentagon. Now I'm not
Speaker 1: alleging a conspiracy necessarily on the part of Chris Carter,
Speaker 1: but if you remember, many many years ago, Alex Jones
Speaker 1: interviewed one of the Lone Gunmen, which is an important
Speaker 1: character a series of characters that appear in the X
Speaker 1: Files narrative, and the character from the Lone Gunman was
Speaker 1: talking about that the CIA would come and help consult
Speaker 1: and tell them what they would like to be in
Speaker 1: the script and what they would like in the X Files.
Speaker 1: So it's not a schitzo thing. People, So oh, you're
Speaker 1: you're skitzo. You think that the the movies are talking
Speaker 1: to you, and you think the movies are telling you
Speaker 1: what's going on. You know, the movies are reflecting what
Speaker 1: the Deep State and the Pentagon actually is talking about.
Speaker 1: And so many people for so many years have said
Speaker 1: that this is just you know, insane conspiracy theorizing and whatnot.
Speaker 1: Even though very famous texts will talk about the relationship
Speaker 1: between the science fiction writers, the culture drivers, and the
Speaker 1: people at the Pentagon, DARPA, et cetera. They do that
Speaker 1: on purpose because it's very important to control the culture,
Speaker 1: to mass control the people. And we're at an age now,
Speaker 1: I think where that's getting harder and harder for them
Speaker 1: to do. So you're getting the sort of divide between
Speaker 1: people getting dumber and dumber and dumber. A large portion
Speaker 1: of them who are kind of becoming like you know,
Speaker 1: it's like the Eloi Morlock thing that ahgu Wells wrote
Speaker 1: about in the Time Machine, and you've got other people
Speaker 1: that are becoming more and more intelligent. They're using the
Speaker 1: internet the right way. They're using it for a monetary
Speaker 1: protoco calls like ethical money like bitcoin. They're using it
Speaker 1: to actually get education, to actually get real information, which
Speaker 1: I think intelligent people know can never be replaced with AI.
Speaker 1: AI can be a more advanced, glorified search engine at
Speaker 1: this stage, which is kind of what it is. I mean,
Speaker 1: I use a crock as a quicker search engine. But
Speaker 1: even these AIS, as Alex has pointed out, I've seen
Speaker 1: them lying multiple times over. In fact, I asked, I
Speaker 1: think it was Chad GBT the same question five minutes apart,
Speaker 1: and I got the exact opposite answer. So there's no
Speaker 1: way that, Like I mean, obviously there's some chicanery going
Speaker 1: on with AI, and certainly they want to use AI
Speaker 1: for social engineering. Everything from the Bantag's point of the
Speaker 1: oligarchical elite is a type of or could be used
Speaker 1: for social engineering, and AI really is just another dio
Speaker 1: sex machina, a god from within that will be a
Speaker 1: con a dupe try to get human beings to believe
Speaker 1: that this entity can be a kind of god for them.
Speaker 1: If you remember in the Foundation series, I'm going from memory,
Speaker 1: it has been maybe ten years since I read that
Speaker 1: Asimov has a fake religious cult of priests and people
Speaker 1: like that in the future space Empire that secretly have
Speaker 1: technology that the other people just don't know about. So
Speaker 1: it's a giant AI system that uses future predictive algorithms
Speaker 1: that they're able to track and trace large movements and
Speaker 1: large trends and ideas they give them future predictive advantage,
Speaker 1: but the average population just thinks, actually that it's a
Speaker 1: religious thing. So again they're telling you something about this.
Speaker 1: It's not a god, it's not religion. It's not going
Speaker 1: to become conscious, not evolving to be a deity. That's
Speaker 1: all a deception. But if you want to learn more
Speaker 1: about that, you can go to my chain where I
Speaker 1: lecture through all of these great texts, all these big fat,
Speaker 1: boring geopolitical and establishment texts at Jasonelsons dot com or
Speaker 1: my YouTube channel Jay Dyer, or follow me on Instagram
Speaker 1: and Twitter as well.
Speaker 2: I've got some really good news. You can get Ultra
Speaker 2: Methylene blue for fifty percent off in perpetuity. We have
Speaker 2: the best medical grade at USP.
Speaker 1: I've seen the rave reviews.
Speaker 2: It's just incredible, ten times stronger than any methylene blue
Speaker 2: I ever used. They claim all this other stuff's to
Speaker 2: the USP grade. As a medical doctor told me to
Speaker 2: start taking six years ago, I would barely feel it
Speaker 2: good for your minochondria. But it is next level and
Speaker 2: it's so good for you. Ninety five percent of people
Speaker 2: feel it within thirty minutes. But that's really just the
Speaker 2: first effect. It's the overall effect. Your energy, your overall health,
Speaker 2: your immune system, your cells. It skips ahead the oxidizing
Speaker 2: process in the cells. It just does incredible things. That's
Speaker 2: why Robert Kenny Junior swears by it. We have the
Speaker 2: best Well. If you become a subscriber to Ultra Methylene Blue,
Speaker 2: meaning you get it every month, cancel any time, no charge.
Speaker 2: If you want, you can lock in in perpetuity just
Speaker 2: one click at checkout at the aloshow shore dot com
Speaker 2: where it'll always be held back for you at fifty
Speaker 2: percent off, and if you ever want to cancel, one
Speaker 2: click you're done. Usually when people subscribe, it's twenty to
Speaker 2: thirty percent off on the sumplements and items. That's a
Speaker 2: great deal to subscribe, and sure you get it. That's
Speaker 2: discount on top of whatever the discount is each month.
Speaker 2: But I made the decision to go with fifty percent
Speaker 2: off when you subscribe because I know you're gonna love it,
Speaker 2: and I know you're gonna want it, and I want
Speaker 2: people that have been on the fence to get it,
Speaker 2: and I want to have that relationship with you where
Speaker 2: you stand with us into the future. As a commitment,
Speaker 2: but it's a very light commitment. You can cancel anytime.
Speaker 2: We got twenty thousand bottles in today. They said it's
Speaker 2: coming in today, so I talked him this morning. It
Speaker 2: arrived in Fantdel, Arkansas this morning, and they said, what
Speaker 2: sale do you want to do? Because I don't own
Speaker 2: it or run it, but they'll call me a lot
Speaker 2: for advice, the guys at Bigley, and I said, I
Speaker 2: want you to call it the Methylene Blue megasale, and
Speaker 2: I want you to go back to buy two bottles
Speaker 2: get one free, that was so popular, but also buy
Speaker 2: four bottles get two free. Subscribe to day, get fifty
Speaker 2: percent off for life, but let us for a few weeks.
Speaker 2: So if you subscribe right now, it locks in your
Speaker 2: account for fifty percent off of the perpetuity.
Speaker 1: We're not going to do this coming up to a
Speaker 1: few weeks, maybe even sooner, but right now.
Speaker 2: If you subscribe and then you don't just fifty percent off,
Speaker 2: you don't just get that, you get it held back,
Speaker 2: so it never sells out. That is a deal of
Speaker 2: a deal. But you know, the number one rule of
Speaker 2: being a salesman is sell a good product. And the
Speaker 2: number two deal is giving people a good price and
Speaker 2: incentivize them to get in the door because you know,
Speaker 2: when you're selling something good, the only problem you've got
Speaker 2: is convincing people to take action. So for the vast
Speaker 2: majority of you that never go, get our Ultrametherling Blue
Speaker 2: or our Incredible Ultra Strongest Tumoric or the Shillage Year
Speaker 2: the iris c Maaster. These are all top certified, blow
Speaker 2: you away incredible health benefits. So get yours now at
Speaker 2: the Alex Jones store dot com and you can become
Speaker 2: a VIP for thirty dollars a month, Cancel anytime and
Speaker 2: you get forty dollars to spend in the store. You
Speaker 2: get special deals, special sales on top of everything, another
Speaker 2: discome on top of it, and special offers send to
Speaker 2: your email box just for you because we want a
Speaker 2: relationship with you. But you are the variable. You are
Speaker 2: the game changer. You decide whether we win or we lose.
Speaker 2: You decide whether this operation stays in the fight and
Speaker 2: stays in it strong. I am in your hands. I
Speaker 2: am committed to you. Our desk seas are intertwined completely.
Speaker 2: I am as committed to you as I to myself.
Speaker 2: She'll get yours now at the Alex Jones Store dot com.