Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, Telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: A's o'clock strikes thirteen. It's Tuesday, the fifth of May.
Speaker 3: You're our Lord. Twenty twenty six. Well, we've got more
Speaker 3: bills that have been introduced. We've got so many of them.
Speaker 3: We've got the Genius Act, the Genesis Act, and now
Speaker 3: we've got the Clarity Act.
Speaker 2: We've got the Guard Act.
Speaker 3: What are these about, Well, it appears that they are
Speaker 3: laying the foundation, folks, for a new constitution for the
Speaker 3: new society that they want to build after twenty thirty.
Speaker 3: We better pay attention to this because everyone of these
Speaker 3: has tremendous bipartisan support. This isn't about Republicans and Democrats.
Speaker 3: This is some of the most conservative Republicans the most
Speaker 3: liberal Democrats coming together to create a police surveillance state,
Speaker 3: every aspect of it.
Speaker 2: We see this every day.
Speaker 3: Well, you can't use this unless you give us your idea,
Speaker 3: or your biometrics or all this. Now they're about to
Speaker 3: do the same thing, not just with operating systems, crypto
Speaker 3: social media.
Speaker 2: All the ice is now ai to law.
Speaker 3: As they move to force people into these different disruptive technologies.
Speaker 2: They use these disruptive.
Speaker 3: Technologies to institute a permission surveillance state. We'll be right back,
Speaker 3: but let's begin first with the Iran war, because he'dn't understand.
Speaker 3: I've said several times Trump is a one man fourth Turning.
Speaker 3: This is a global depression plus a world of war. Okay,
Speaker 3: but at the very least, this guy, if you look
Speaker 3: at what he has done and what he is in
Speaker 3: the process of doing, is also one man, not just
Speaker 3: fourth Turning, but also one man four horses of the apocalypse.
Speaker 3: And what are we talking about. You know, we're talking
Speaker 3: about war, famine, pestilence with his genetic code injection. It
Speaker 3: wasn't COVID. COVID was not the pestilence. It was the
Speaker 3: vaccine that he unleashed, and the famine as well as
Speaker 3: the byproduct of the war that he's doing. All these
Speaker 3: things together they add up to the fourth horseman of
Speaker 3: the apocalypse. That's the death. This is what Trump is
Speaker 3: truly about. But let's begin with his latest lie of
Speaker 3: the day.
Speaker 4: I fellow Americans, today, I have the tremendous honor of
Speaker 4: announcing my lie of the day. This lie is the
Speaker 4: biggest and most beautiful lie you've ever heard.
Speaker 2: Believe me.
Speaker 5: But the last night you said we might be better
Speaker 5: off not making a deal with wrong.
Speaker 2: Well, I wouldn't have to.
Speaker 4: I didn't say that. I said that if we left
Speaker 4: right now, it would take them twenty years to rebuild.
Speaker 4: But we're not leaving right now.
Speaker 2: We're going to do it.
Speaker 4: So nobody asked you to go back in two years or
Speaker 4: five years.
Speaker 6: So the journalist said, but mister President, last night, you
Speaker 6: said we might be better off not making a deal
Speaker 6: with Iran. Trump said, I didn't say that, And Daniel
Speaker 6: Dale wrote this for CNN fact Check. Trump denied he
Speaker 6: made this remark about Iran. He made it on camera
Speaker 6: one day earlier. And here is the clip and again
Speaker 6: it is the day before the clip you just saw
Speaker 6: with the reporter.
Speaker 4: And yesterday somebody came up said, sure, the tournament is great.
Speaker 2: I said, what tournament are you talking about.
Speaker 7: I'm so busy with the Iranians calling trying to make
Speaker 7: a good deal, and we're not going to let that happen.
Speaker 2: But got to make a bed. They've got to make
Speaker 2: a bad deal.
Speaker 7: But if they make a deal at all, because frankly,
Speaker 7: maybe we're better of not making a deal at all.
Speaker 7: Do you want to know the truth, because we can't
Speaker 7: let this thing go on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're going on the floor.
Speaker 4: We have the best lies.
Speaker 5: Nobody lies that.
Speaker 2: Everything me tremendous. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And of course he does that because people say, well,
Speaker 3: wait a minute, he just said this the night before
Speaker 3: and it was on camera.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, they don't care what you have seen, right.
Speaker 3: We saw this when you had the Ice Minnesota murderers
Speaker 3: and you had Christine Ome as well as Donald Trump
Speaker 3: telling everybody, well, oh this, this is this happened. Now
Speaker 3: they were stuck in the snow and they were attacked
Speaker 3: by these people, had to defend themselves on none of
Speaker 3: that is what happened, right, And they don't care that
Speaker 3: you've already seen video of the event, and you've seen
Speaker 3: it from fifteen different angles. They're going to come up
Speaker 3: with something. They're not even going to try to go
Speaker 3: in and say, yeah, but if you look at it
Speaker 3: from this way, then maybe I can interpret it to
Speaker 3: say no, they just come out with the bowl faced lie.
Speaker 3: They don't care what you've seen. Don't believe you're lying.
Speaker 3: Eyes believe you're lying. Politicians. It's the bottom line. Well,
Speaker 3: of course, if we go back and we look at
Speaker 3: yesterday was the also the met gale, I think last night,
Speaker 3: so all these people are wearing their weird outfits and
Speaker 3: some people were trolling Trump. So here's Trump at the
Speaker 3: Met the gala of the strange outfits that they have,
Speaker 3: and they've.
Speaker 2: Got him wearing Let's see what is that.
Speaker 3: It's blue and white striped and it's got a gold
Speaker 3: dome at the top.
Speaker 2: Is that Trump dress?
Speaker 3: It's the Epstein Island Temple.
Speaker 2: Why.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So they are trolling him everywhere. This is happening. Actually,
Speaker 3: I think on Times Square the Lincoln Project people paid
Speaker 3: for a billboard where you've got Epstein and Trump and
Speaker 3: their shifty eyes looking at each other as they shifted
Speaker 3: from one side to the other.
Speaker 2: We can't let that go away.
Speaker 3: That is perhaps the lie that is not just of
Speaker 3: one day, but the lie that continues to go on
Speaker 3: and on and on. A lot of people have looked
Speaker 3: at this press conference that Millennia did and the people
Speaker 3: that were involved in this, and you know, this is
Speaker 3: this dispute back and forth as to what was her
Speaker 3: involvement with Epstein. Did Epstein introduce them to each other,
Speaker 3: and of course the New York Times had reported that
Speaker 3: it wasn't just you know before Michael Wolfe reported that.
Speaker 3: And so the question is what is really happening with
Speaker 3: this is somebody that was very close to the four
Speaker 3: of them as well, and this couple and the couple
Speaker 3: broke up, and the guy is a real sleazy character,
Speaker 3: and he is now an ambassador. Forget what country he
Speaker 3: was in. I'm not going to go into a lot
Speaker 3: of detail about it, but he's now been made ambassador
Speaker 3: by Trump and he wound up getting Trump to send
Speaker 3: in his ice schoons in the middle of the night
Speaker 3: to arrest his former wife and deeporter from the country
Speaker 3: she's talking, Oh is Italy?
Speaker 2: Is Italy where she did that.
Speaker 3: She's done a series of interviews in Italy talking about
Speaker 3: Milania and Epstein, and there's zero interest in mainstream media
Speaker 3: of covering that. There's a very long article that you'll
Speaker 3: find the Free Thought Project that's excellent about that, But
Speaker 3: I'm not going to go into that today. We've got
Speaker 3: other fish to fry. Just remember this really is Operation
Speaker 3: Epstein Fury. That's a big part of what he's doing.
Speaker 3: Of course, the other part of it is you know,
Speaker 3: two hundred million dollars from one Israeli donor to do
Speaker 3: whatever they say. And when you look at what Trump
Speaker 3: is doing in terms of this back and forth of
Speaker 3: the peace proposal, regardless of what he asked to say, well,
Speaker 3: we're going to have them make a bad deal. I'm
Speaker 3: not even going to look at the deal. I did
Speaker 3: look at the deal. Back and forth. You never know
Speaker 3: what this guy is going to say. But the reality
Speaker 3: is is that he got the deal. He did look
Speaker 3: at the deal, and then he said he's going to
Speaker 3: not go with the deal. And he said that he
Speaker 3: went to an Israeli a newspaper to give them an
Speaker 3: interview to tell them that, because that's what they want
Speaker 3: to hear. And they're the ones who are giving him money.
Speaker 3: So yeah, maybe we're better off not making a deal.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, Yeah, he wrongly claimed that
Speaker 3: he had been speaking in jest and exaggerating when he
Speaker 3: promised during his twenty twenty four campaign to immediately end
Speaker 3: the war in Ukraine if elected again.
Speaker 2: You think he was kidding. You will hear this all
Speaker 2: the time from the Maga cult. Oh, he's just kidding.
Speaker 3: When he compares himself to Jesus, or he's just kidding
Speaker 3: when he says he's a king and so forth. Well,
Speaker 3: certainly he wasn't kidding when he was talking about ending
Speaker 3: the war in Ukraine. He publicly made that promise on
Speaker 3: more than fifty occasions, and it was done in an
Speaker 3: entirely serious manner. Now, the people that he's trolling are
Speaker 3: the cult that is there. They're the ones that he's trolling.
Speaker 3: During his twenty twenty four campaign, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: he falsely claimed that he had never said lock her
Speaker 3: up about Hillary Clinton. You and I have heard him
Speaker 3: say that multiple times when he was running. He had
Speaker 3: done so multiple occasions and televised rallies attended by thousands
Speaker 3: of people. I remember Joe Biggs and he had a
Speaker 3: Hillary for Prison T shirt and he went to one
Speaker 3: of the one of the rallies and he stood up
Speaker 3: in front and he opened up his shirt to sell it,
Speaker 3: and Trump's like, yeah, we'll lock her up, And I
Speaker 3: was like, I said it all the time, That's why
Speaker 3: I did the T shirt.
Speaker 5: Maybe he thought, you know, Joe Biggs was a woman,
Speaker 5: and he was saying, we're eventually going to lock her up,
Speaker 5: because that's what actually happened.
Speaker 2: I think any might ever mistake Joe Biggs for a woman.
Speaker 5: Joe, if you hear this, that was just a joke.
Speaker 5: Joe seems to be doing well and I'm really glad
Speaker 5: to see that.
Speaker 2: That's good. Yeah, yeah, he did why.
Speaker 3: He was responsible for getting Joe Biggs locked up and
Speaker 3: a lot of other j six people, and he turned
Speaker 3: his back on them. He could have pardoned them because
Speaker 3: they did it to support him and to support his
Speaker 3: contention that the election was rigged. Yes, the election was rigged.
Speaker 3: Every election is rigged, folks. It's rigged by the parties
Speaker 3: who do the jerry mandering. Is rigged by the parties
Speaker 3: who make sure that independence and third parties can't get
Speaker 3: on the ballot, and they choose who their candidates are
Speaker 3: going to be, and they make sure that but only
Speaker 3: the people that they choose are allowed to participate in debates.
Speaker 3: It's rigged in so many different ways. There was nothing
Speaker 3: new about that whatsoever. And so yeah, he's he's out
Speaker 3: there and he's saying that we have to you know,
Speaker 3: it's either threatening them again.
Speaker 2: Well, I wouldn't have to. I didn't say that.
Speaker 4: I said that if we left right now, it would
Speaker 4: take them twenty years to rebuild.
Speaker 2: But we're not leaving right now.
Speaker 4: We're going to do it so nobody has to go
Speaker 4: back in two years or five years. They told me
Speaker 4: about the concept of the deal. They're going to give
Speaker 4: me the exact wording.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this whole kingility eliminating.
Speaker 7: Correctly, Well, i'd like to eliminated.
Speaker 4: I'd like to it'd be a start for them to
Speaker 4: build up again.
Speaker 7: And yeah, I would like to eliminate it.
Speaker 8: For what circumstances would you start military strife from markets?
Speaker 9: I don't want to say that.
Speaker 4: I mean, I can't tell that to a reporter.
Speaker 2: If they misbehave and I'd have to kill you bad.
Speaker 4: But right now, we'll see. But you know, it's it's
Speaker 4: a possibility that could happen.
Speaker 3: Certain Yeah, Well, more threats about what he's going to do.
Speaker 3: And of course he claims that he's taken away eighty
Speaker 3: five percent of their missiles. I know I can't verify that.
Speaker 3: I don't think he can either. What we do know
Speaker 3: is that he's taken away eighty five percent of his
Speaker 3: support approximately, He's only got about fifteen percent support with
Speaker 3: the American people. Well, he went to Israel because It's
Speaker 3: always about Israel first, isn't it. He even pointed that
Speaker 3: out as to why we have this war.
Speaker 7: Happened all very quickly, we thought, and I thought, maybe
Speaker 7: more so than most I could ask Marco, but I
Speaker 7: thought we were going to have a situation where we
Speaker 7: were going to be attacked. They were getting ready to
Speaker 7: attack Israel, they were getting ready to attack others. You're
Speaker 7: seeing that right now.
Speaker 2: It's all about protecting.
Speaker 7: Those hitting in There's are stationary those were aimed there
Speaker 7: for a long period of time at these other countries.
Speaker 2: So I think I was right about that.
Speaker 7: We attacked first, and if we didn't, it could have
Speaker 7: been you know, look, we're really decimating them. They're being
Speaker 7: decimated and if we didn't, if we didn't, and by
Speaker 7: the way, we have massive amounts of ammunition, we have
Speaker 7: the high end. A lot of it was given away
Speaker 7: stupidly by Biden, very stupidly for free. And I'm all
Speaker 7: for Ukraine, but they gave away a lot. As you know,
Speaker 7: when I give away ammunition, everybody pays for it. The
Speaker 7: European Union's paying for it. Then they can do what
Speaker 7: they want with it. But they are giving it. Let's
Speaker 7: say to Ukraine and it's.
Speaker 2: Okay, yes, okay, we don't want to have peace in Ukraine. Right.
Speaker 3: You know this guy is he's penny wise, isn't he
Speaker 3: got he's wised up about pennies. We've got to ban
Speaker 3: the pennies. Next is going to be the nickel, because
Speaker 3: we just can't afford to make these slug coins that
Speaker 3: have no intrinsic value. That was the original debasement of
Speaker 3: the currency. Now they're want to get rid of all
Speaker 3: currency altogether so they can track and control all of
Speaker 3: our economic activity. And that's what they're really doing. But
Speaker 3: of course, you know he's penny wise, but he's foolishly
Speaker 3: pounding the world with bombs and then complaining about the
Speaker 3: fact that we can't build these things quickly enough. As
Speaker 3: a matter of fact, when you look at what it's
Speaker 3: going to take, it's going to take many, many years
Speaker 3: to replenish all the stuff that we spent to protect Israel.
Speaker 3: And it's not even about protecting Israel. For thirty five years,
Speaker 3: you had Netnyahu telling people that nuclear bomb was imminent
Speaker 3: coming from Iran. That was a lie. We saw him
Speaker 3: lie about that over and over again. You know, it's
Speaker 3: only going to be just a short period of time,
Speaker 3: and it's just a matter of months, maybe a year
Speaker 3: or two. He's been saying that for thirty five years.
Speaker 3: And the reality is is that there was no eminent threat.
Speaker 3: We heard played the cliff for you yesterday. Heg Seth
Speaker 3: as he was asked and said, well, no, we you know,
Speaker 3: did you bomb their nuclear Oh yeah, we covered it.
Speaker 3: We nuked that thing. You know, didn't say nuked it,
Speaker 3: but you know we turned it into dust. There was
Speaker 3: nothing there. Well, wait a minute, you just said that
Speaker 3: there was an eminent threat that we had to defend against.
Speaker 3: There was no eminent threat to the US, not even
Speaker 3: to Israel. Israel has superior conventional wisdom weapons and they
Speaker 3: have nuclear weapons as well. This was about the greater
Speaker 3: Israel project. This is about destroying the Middle East so
Speaker 3: they can take it over like they did Gaza. Let's
Speaker 3: understand what is truly the basis of this. And so
Speaker 3: as Trump rejects any peace proposal from Iran, he goes
Speaker 3: to Israel's con news on said no, this is unacceptable
Speaker 3: to me. You'll be happy to know I'm going to
Speaker 3: continue your war, you know. Mark Levin tells people, Oh,
Speaker 3: they saying that he did it for Israel. But they
Speaker 3: got to say to this and it's like Trump has
Speaker 3: said it, Rubio has said it. We're supposed to not
Speaker 3: see that. According to Mark Levin, really so Trump rejects
Speaker 3: the Iranian Peace Office offer. Neither party appears to be
Speaker 3: willing to budge, says our T, speaking to Israel's con
Speaker 3: News on Sunday. He considers it, he says unacceptable. He said,
Speaker 3: Iran has not yet paid a big enough price for
Speaker 3: what they have done to humanity and to the world
Speaker 3: over the last forty seven years. What have they done?
Speaker 3: You want to you want to mention that? And let's
Speaker 3: eighty six. This forty seven nonsense, okay, once and for all.
Speaker 3: I mean, come on, forty seven years ago, what they
Speaker 3: do they took over the USM. They do anything to
Speaker 3: humanity in the world with that, No, even if that
Speaker 3: was unprovoked, but it was provoked by about twenty five
Speaker 3: years worth of American attacks on them, going back to
Speaker 3: nineteen fifty three, putting in the Shaw and his secret
Speaker 3: police and training them to be brutal and ruthless. That
Speaker 3: was the crime against Iran, not against even humanity in
Speaker 3: the world. But this is about the US and Iran
Speaker 3: in our history, and our history doesn't start forty seven
Speaker 3: years ago, it starts seventy three years ago. So US
Speaker 3: lawmakers are stepping up their efforts, says RTE, to strip
Speaker 3: Trump of authority over the Iran war. Are they I
Speaker 3: don't see them doing anything over this. I mean, it's
Speaker 3: just been nothing but prevarications and procrastinations is what we've
Speaker 3: seen the Congress do. Despite a ceasefire, which has been
Speaker 3: in place since early April, the US continues to enforce
Speaker 3: a naval block on Irani imports. While Iran has restricted
Speaker 3: traffic through the Straight of Hor moves the Strategic Waterway
Speaker 3: has been effectively closed as a result. Yeah, they'll say, well,
Speaker 3: you had two or three ships get through or something.
Speaker 3: That used to be about one hundred and fifty a day,
Speaker 3: now it's two or three a day. Democrat and Republican
Speaker 3: lawmakers are increasingly questioning the administration's strategy. Strategy Do they
Speaker 3: have one? I think the strategy is only endless war
Speaker 3: to Gaza side the entire Middle East for Israel. Trump's
Speaker 3: claimed that the Iran conflict has been terminated fuels a dispute.
Speaker 3: Say this is the other big lie. You know, we
Speaker 3: didn't do a show on Friday. We had recorded interviews,
Speaker 3: but that was really the lie of the day. What
Speaker 3: you had all of Congress saying, well, you know, they
Speaker 3: have a ceasefire, so the clock stops, or we can
Speaker 3: extend it another thirty days to get the troops out
Speaker 3: of harm's way that they put into harm's way. And
Speaker 3: of course the War Powers Act doesn't give the president
Speaker 3: the authority to start a war. It gives him the
Speaker 3: authority to react to a war for sixty days without
Speaker 3: having to get a congressional declaration. But nothing legally or
Speaker 3: morally authorizes a war of choice, a war of aggression.
Speaker 2: Nothing.
Speaker 3: And yet they all lie about it, pretty much, everybody
Speaker 3: in Congress, pretty much, all the Republicans for sure, are
Speaker 3: lying about all this stuff. And the Trump administration saying, eh,
Speaker 3: the clock stopped when we did a ceasefire. And so
Speaker 3: in a letter to Congress on Friday, he went even further.
Speaker 3: He said, the hostilities of Iran have been quote terminated, terminated.
Speaker 3: Do you know that?
Speaker 2: Did you know? The war is over?
Speaker 3: I guess the Iranians didn't get the memo, yes, or
Speaker 3: neither did the US because there were conflicts that are
Speaker 3: happening yesterday as well. He said, since April the seventh,
Speaker 3: not a single exchange of fire has been recorded between
Speaker 3: the US forces and Iran. That all changed yesterday. And
Speaker 3: so you have the Squeaker of the House, Mouse Johnson,
Speaker 3: and Senate pro tempt Chuck Grassley said the hostilities that
Speaker 3: began on February the twenty eighth have effectively terminated. The
Speaker 3: only thing necessary for evil to triumph. Is for why
Speaker 3: I wouldn't even say good men, I would say for
Speaker 3: the GOP men to do nothing. They do nothing about Epstein,
Speaker 3: They do nothing about the war. According to Trump, he
Speaker 3: stayed within the sixty day limit during the war against Iran,
Speaker 3: therefore has not violated the law governing the use of
Speaker 3: force and overseas conflicts. Yeah, you know, he said, at
Speaker 3: one point in time, you're going to be so tired
Speaker 3: of winning, You're going to say, let's let's not win anymore. Well,
Speaker 3: I think what he really meant to say was, you're
Speaker 3: going to be so tired of my lying, You're going
Speaker 3: to say, please stop lying to me. We all know
Speaker 3: you're a liar, and we've established that over and over again.
Speaker 3: Why bother with the effort. We don't believe a thing
Speaker 3: he has to say right now. And then you get
Speaker 3: to Chuck Schumer. Trump is even making Chuck Schumer look
Speaker 3: good because Trump Chuck told the truth about Trump Chuck
Speaker 3: versus Chump. He said, this is all nonsense. He said,
Speaker 3: this is an illegal war, and everyday Republicans remain complicit
Speaker 3: and allow it to continue as another day that lives
Speaker 3: are endangered, chaos erupts, prices increase, while Americans foot the bill,
Speaker 3: vote for us, so we can do the same thing.
Speaker 3: That's the reality. They don't want to stop. This is
Speaker 3: just part ofsan opposition. They're not really opposed to chaos.
Speaker 3: They're not opposed to lives being endangered. They're not opposed
Speaker 3: to price increases, tax increases, and sticking Americans with the bill.
Speaker 3: They're not opposed to any of that. So we're going
Speaker 3: a ceasefire right now, said Hegseth, which in our understanding
Speaker 3: means the sixty day clock pauses or stops. I don't
Speaker 3: know that Hegseth has any understanding. I think he doesn't
Speaker 3: understand any of this stuff. He just says what Trump
Speaker 3: tells him to say. I do not believe the statute
Speaker 3: would support that, said Senator Kine, citing serious constitutional concerns.
Speaker 3: Constitutional concerns come on. The Constitution is obviously a dead
Speaker 3: letter that has been burned and buried long ago. As
Speaker 3: a matter of fact, there's a great article on mesas
Speaker 3: talking about the fact that we are in the version
Speaker 3: number four of America. We got rid of the constant
Speaker 3: a long long time ago. I think it's still worth
Speaker 3: talking about it because I think it's still a great framework,
Speaker 3: and I think that it highlights the fact that these
Speaker 3: people who rule us have no legitimate authority. They are tyrants.
Speaker 3: They have a lot of power, but they have no authority,
Speaker 3: and we always need to make that distinction. That's why
Speaker 3: I talk about the Constitution. They don't care about it's all.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, as I point out at
Speaker 3: the beginning of the program, they're very busy writing a
Speaker 3: brand new constitution for a police state, and they've got
Speaker 3: a lot of new laws that are going to be
Speaker 3: the basis to use this disruptive technology to disrupt our
Speaker 3: lives and to turn our society into a permission based
Speaker 3: society where the police surveil and track everything that we do. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that is what they're working on right now. So Mike
Speaker 3: Johnson backed access few. Well, of course he does, because
Speaker 3: they're post sycophants. He says, we're not at war. We
Speaker 3: are policing the Strait of Hormuz. Oh so it's a
Speaker 3: police action, it's not a war. Yeah, we heard that
Speaker 3: from Democrat Harry Truman, didn't we But the Korean War, Notice,
Speaker 3: nobody ever says the Korean police action. Everybody knew it
Speaker 3: was a war. Everybody knew Truman was lying. He was
Speaker 3: the guy who basically put in place the National Security State.
Speaker 3: He created the NSA by executive order. He promulgated the
Speaker 3: CIA and all the rest of this stuff as well,
Speaker 3: and he started creating the national security state. The America
Speaker 3: is the world's policeman. Or we do whatever we want anywhere,
Speaker 3: and we don't ever declare war. We forget about the Constitution.
Speaker 3: And so that's where Mike Johnson is now. As I said,
Speaker 3: the Republicans of today the Democrats of my youth. The
Speaker 3: Democrats of today are the Marxists of my youth, and
Speaker 3: they're both pushing us towards a new thing, a technocracy. Well,
Speaker 3: you know, it was kind of interesting. Well, Mike Johnson
Speaker 3: as they're talking about passing FAIZA and how it was
Speaker 3: necessary to do that, and when he was talking about
Speaker 3: what Ice is doing in various places, you know, he
Speaker 3: complains about the fact the absurdity that we would ever
Speaker 3: think that you should have search warrants.
Speaker 10: Imagine if we had to go through the process of
Speaker 10: getting a judicial warrant, an additional warrant to go and
Speaker 10: apprehend people who we know are here illegally. How much
Speaker 10: time would they take. We don't have enough judges, we
Speaker 10: don't have enough time. It would take decades probably to
Speaker 10: do that. The people who are advocating for that don't
Speaker 10: want any immigration enforcement.
Speaker 3: They do not, and so of course now they didn't
Speaker 3: want to have warrants. You know, if you opposed what
Speaker 3: Ice was doing is because you didn't want to have
Speaker 3: immigration enforcement. But now this guy turns around and says,
Speaker 3: so we don't need to have warrants to spy on
Speaker 3: Americans under the FISA Act. We're going to extend it,
Speaker 3: not for one a half years that Trump demanded, but
Speaker 3: after having demanded that it be removed. And he gets
Speaker 3: in power, and it's like, oh, I like the ring
Speaker 3: of power feels good when I put it on my finger,
Speaker 3: and so now he wants it not removed, but he
Speaker 3: wants it extended for one half years. Then they wind
Speaker 3: up extending it for three years thanks to that guy.
Speaker 3: He says, we can't bother with warrants. Let me tell
Speaker 3: you something. The Bill of Rights is there to protect
Speaker 3: our God given rights. And if we are going to
Speaker 3: allow the government to expedite things for its own purposes,
Speaker 3: then we wind up with no rights whatsoever. The Bill
Speaker 3: of Rights was there designed as an impediment to what
Speaker 3: these people are doing. We don't want to make it
Speaker 3: easy for them to do that. And of course the
Speaker 3: flip side of that is that you're going to have
Speaker 3: some if you go with due process and you have
Speaker 3: strict rules about how the government can accuse and try
Speaker 3: and punish people. If you have those strict rules, guess
Speaker 3: what you're going to have some people who are really guilty,
Speaker 3: who are going to go through are going to use
Speaker 3: those rules, game them, gain the system, and get away
Speaker 3: with it. And if you react to that by saying, well,
Speaker 3: we're going to get rid of those restrictions on government
Speaker 3: because I want all the criminals to be punished, that's
Speaker 3: still not going to happen.
Speaker 2: What you're going to do.
Speaker 3: Is turning the government into the biggest criminal, the biggest
Speaker 3: domestic terrorists you have ever seen. The last thing we want,
Speaker 3: you know, we want to have the criminals punished, right,
Speaker 3: I agree with that. However, if you get away, if
Speaker 3: you get away from the Bill of Rights and restrictions,
Speaker 3: you're going to wind up with the government as the criminal.
Speaker 3: That is the most dangerous scenario. We don't live in
Speaker 3: a perfect world, and so criminals are going to get
Speaker 3: away with stuff, and the criminals will get away with stuff.
Speaker 3: If you have the government coming after everybody else, they
Speaker 3: still will get away with it. It'll be the innocent
Speaker 3: people who get caught up in this stuff. If somebody
Speaker 3: is a criminal, they're going to be gaming this system.
Speaker 3: They're coming in offensively with this kind of thing. But
Speaker 3: if we get rid of the things that are there,
Speaker 3: the very foundation of the basis of our government, as
Speaker 3: the Declaration of Independence, which you're going to celebrate the
Speaker 3: two hundred and fifteen anniversary of it this year, the
Speaker 3: very basis for setting up the American government was that
Speaker 3: government was there to protect our god given rights, and
Speaker 3: it wasn't about safety. It was about protecting our god
Speaker 3: given rights and making sure that government doesn't become the
Speaker 3: biggest destructor of those rights, because that's what it always
Speaker 3: tends to do. Because power corrupts, and absolute power corupts.
Speaker 3: Absolutely we know that.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 3: The Democrats are casting Republicans is prioritizing the president's ambitions
Speaker 3: over the needs of the American people. And that is
Speaker 3: absolutely true. That is a winning issue. We can all
Speaker 3: see that. That is what is happening, and so it's
Speaker 3: going to be truly amazing if we don't see a
Speaker 3: sea change. This is why the Republicans, rather than adjusting
Speaker 3: their policy to put Americans first, rather than adjusting their
Speaker 3: policy to start trying to follow the Constitution or follow
Speaker 3: the Bill Rights Framework, what they've done is they've doubled
Speaker 3: down on gaming the system. The Republicans are looking at
Speaker 3: the midterms and they're saying, well, you know what.
Speaker 2: We need to do.
Speaker 3: We need to do more gerrymandering, just more corruption. We
Speaker 3: need to outgame these people. We don't need to do
Speaker 3: the right thing, we don't need to try to help
Speaker 3: Americans know. We need to rig the system more in
Speaker 3: our favor. And that's what they're doing. And he's a
Speaker 3: massive sea change in the fall. It'll be because they've
Speaker 3: been very successful at gaming the system, through the two
Speaker 3: party system, through the gerry mandering, through the electronic voting,
Speaker 3: through the vote by mail, and all the rest of
Speaker 3: this stuff. Both parties are gaming the system rather than
Speaker 3: listening to the people. They don't care what we want
Speaker 3: as long as they can rig the elections. So you've
Speaker 3: got a couple of Republicans who have broken with Trump
Speaker 3: publicly in the Senate, really only Ran Paul, but Susan
Speaker 3: Collins is saying and Lisa Murkowski are saying they might
Speaker 3: break with him because they're living in states that are
Speaker 3: predominantly Democrat, and so they don't want to be seen
Speaker 3: as being too close to Trump. But it mays be
Speaker 3: seen they'll actually grow a spine and oppose him. Meanwhile,
Speaker 3: as Reason magazine points out, there are civilians across the
Speaker 3: Middle East. They said, when we look at this war,
Speaker 3: how they're affected. And they looked at people from Iran,
Speaker 3: from Israel, from Lebanon, from Kuwait and Dubai and all
Speaker 3: these different places. They said, there is a fear that
Speaker 3: settles in your heart. As one Iranian woman texted to
Speaker 3: her American relative. She said, now they're hitting everything. Nowhere
Speaker 3: is safe. Think about that. Think about not only the
Speaker 3: corrupt and moral way, illegal, way, unconstitutional way this war began,
Speaker 3: but think about the immorality of how it's conducted, not
Speaker 3: only initiating a war of aggression, but deliberately targeting civilians.
Speaker 3: And Trump has said this over and over again, We'll
Speaker 3: wipe out their entire civilization. Where's he getting these kinds
Speaker 3: of ideas from Netanyahu, who's done it already?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: This is you know, these people are living and they're
Speaker 3: the ones who are feeding him all this information. They're
Speaker 3: living in his head. He's listening to people like Mark
Speaker 3: Levin and net Yahoo, and he is doing total war.
Speaker 3: We're going to kill all the civilians, and not just
Speaker 3: start the war, but we're going to focus on civilians.
Speaker 3: Most Americans have fortunately never seen war firsthand rites reason,
Speaker 3: and most of those who have. Those who have were
Speaker 3: typically troops who were sent to fight far away. War
Speaker 3: in your hometown is a strange experience, especially a modern
Speaker 3: air war without front lines. Things you take for granted,
Speaker 3: from electricity to the freedom to go outside disappear. Life's
Speaker 3: soundtrack becomes sirens and explosions. The danger feels distant until
Speaker 3: it isn't. Death comes seemingly at random. Let me just
Speaker 3: say that Americans have been blessed to follow God and
Speaker 3: have a legacy of that God has blessed with peace
Speaker 3: here in America. When we continue to do these immoral acts,
Speaker 3: we are storing up wrath not only from God but
Speaker 3: also from the people that we're attacking without justification. These
Speaker 3: chickens are going to come home to roost. This wrath
Speaker 3: that we have been storing up, these sowing end of
Speaker 3: this whirlwind, Well, that whirlwind is going to come for
Speaker 3: us one day. And as you see technology changing, you
Speaker 3: see hypersonic missiles, as you see nuclear cruise missiles, nuclear
Speaker 3: in the sense that they are nuclear powered and can
Speaker 3: stay in the air indefinitely. As you see all these
Speaker 3: different changes in warfare, you see the changes in artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: You see the.
Speaker 3: Pentagon leaning on this, and I believe it will be
Speaker 3: a crutch that will pierce our own hands when we
Speaker 3: lean on artificial intelligence. But it's going to become a
Speaker 3: cyber war. There's going to be drone warfare, and the
Speaker 3: ocean that has protected us on both sides is not
Speaker 3: going to protect us in the future. So we are
Speaker 3: sowing the seeds that are going to haunt us in
Speaker 3: the future. Of February the twenty eighth, during the US
Speaker 3: is really surprise attack. Missiles hit the elementary school that
Speaker 3: we all know about in Monab and also in a
Speaker 3: gym two towns on the Iranian coast. This person that
Speaker 3: they interviewed here Reason magazine had a daughter that was
Speaker 3: in the high school volleyball team practicing at the gym.
Speaker 3: He rushed over when a neighbor told him about the attack.
Speaker 3: He said the injuries. The injured people were bleeding heavily,
Speaker 3: some had lost consciousness on the ground. Others were screaming
Speaker 3: without stopping. He said, the voices were deafening, and he
Speaker 3: found that his daughter had died. Since dun Wars touched
Speaker 3: almost every corner of the Middle East and has spoke
Speaker 3: to civilians from all sides of the conflict. And I'm
Speaker 3: not going to go into all the details about this.
Speaker 3: It's horrible enough. Meanwhile, we look at what is coming.
Speaker 3: As I said at the beginning of the program, Trump
Speaker 3: has been a one man fourth turning global depression as
Speaker 3: well as global war.
Speaker 2: Now he is.
Speaker 3: Really a one man version of the four horsemen of
Speaker 3: the apocalypse now as well, war famine. That's what we're
Speaker 3: going to talk about now, the famine as well as
Speaker 3: pestilence with his genetic code injection, the MR and a
Speaker 3: stuff and all of those add up to the fourth
Speaker 3: one of death. Chef Jose Andre warns of multiple year
Speaker 3: world famine from the Iran War. He's a founder of
Speaker 3: something called the World Central Kitchen. He believes the war
Speaker 3: could cause a silent collapse of the global fertilizer trait. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we've talked about this from the very beginning, not only
Speaker 3: the ability to grow food with the fertilizer that so
Speaker 3: many people depend on, but also and it's the kind
Speaker 3: of food, the big massive agricultural grains and things like
Speaker 3: that that are kind of the foundation not necessarily what
Speaker 3: is good for U steep, but what we do eat.
Speaker 3: But also when you look at the foundations for other things,
Speaker 3: you know, plastics as well as microprocessors and the helium
Speaker 3: that is needed for that. There's so many different things,
Speaker 3: not just energy, but energy is fundamental but also affects fertilizer,
Speaker 3: helium and many other things are necessary ingredients for the
Speaker 3: kinds of products that have become the staples of our lives,
Speaker 3: and Trump is destroying all of that. So he's been
Speaker 3: warning people to stop looking at the oil tickers and
Speaker 3: start looking at the soil. He believes the world is
Speaker 3: sleepwalking into a massive multi year famine, being slow walked
Speaker 3: by the silent collapse of the global fertilizer trade as
Speaker 3: a byproduct of this Trump war. I foresee a very
Speaker 3: big increase in the famine across the world by the
Speaker 3: fall of twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven, he said.
Speaker 3: And so he said, whenever you see these types of
Speaker 3: things that we're seeing, disruptions and global trade, they will
Speaker 3: ripple into higher prices, into lower output, and they will
Speaker 3: hit the poorest countries the hardest. So those of us
Speaker 3: who still have food in the West will be paying
Speaker 3: a lot more for it those and some poor countries
Speaker 3: won't have it at all. That's going to be Trump's legacy,
Speaker 3: And of course his number one priority and getting in
Speaker 3: in this second term, has been to disrupt global trade.
Speaker 3: Stop and think about it. Everything the man has done
Speaker 3: from day one has been to disrupt global trade, and
Speaker 3: that is going to have massive consequences in every area
Speaker 3: of our life. He began his second term with war,
Speaker 3: with sanctions, with tariffs and all this sort of stuff,
Speaker 3: threatening other countries, threatening Canada, threatening Greenland. I mean, the
Speaker 3: man is insane. I don't care how old he is.
Speaker 3: I don't care if he can't remember what he had
Speaker 3: for breakfast this morning. He is fundamentally insane and belligerent,
Speaker 3: and he needs to be removed. Trump defense proposal is
Speaker 3: going to as I've said so many times, they hit
Speaker 3: a record level over trillion dollars, and immediately he and warpeat.
Speaker 3: You're still calling him a war pig. I want to
Speaker 3: go another fifty percent over what was a record.
Speaker 2: And we have.
Speaker 3: We're spending more on the military than the next eight
Speaker 3: countries combined. You talk about fear and poa boy, it
Speaker 3: is working overtime in Washington, isn't it. You know, they
Speaker 3: sell that fear, they sell that paranoia to pick our pockets,
Speaker 3: so they always do. Global military spending meanwhile, has hit
Speaker 3: a record two point seven trillion dollars in twenty twenty four,
Speaker 3: and again half of that is US, truly amazing. So
Speaker 3: he was saying in terms of talking about food, he says,
Speaker 3: you know, same type of stuff. Jerald Clinty says, you know,
Speaker 3: trillions for war, not a penny for peace, and that's
Speaker 3: what he's saying. He said, we choose not to feed people,
Speaker 3: we choose not to build, we choose mayhem. We are
Speaker 3: led by people who like to be warriors. And we've
Speaker 3: never seen this kind of hubris from our leaders about
Speaker 3: war ever in the past that we see Trump and
Speaker 3: from warpig. So again, what does it mean for us?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 3: As he points out, you know, when you start starving
Speaker 3: people in these third world countries, what are they going
Speaker 3: to do? They're going to run to our country. They
Speaker 3: have to eat. And so he said, we can build
Speaker 3: all the walls we want, and we can have all
Speaker 3: the ice gestapo police that we want, but if these
Speaker 3: people are hungry, if you've got hungry mothers who need
Speaker 3: to feed their children, there is no wall that is
Speaker 3: thick or big enough that is going to stop them.
Speaker 3: You know, I've talked many times about the welfare magnet,
Speaker 3: What about the famine magnet? What if Trump steps that up?
Speaker 3: As people pointed out, all these wars that we do,
Speaker 3: they usually wind up stoking immigration into our countries. This
Speaker 3: is going to be even worse. Everything the man does
Speaker 3: is contradictory to what he says he wants to see happen.
Speaker 3: Iron fires in the US warship and straight of horm
Speaker 3: moves yesterday after Trump announced plans to guide the ships
Speaker 3: through the Straight of hor Moves. But you know, at
Speaker 3: the same time he's saying the war is over, he
Speaker 3: is he is such a liar. He needs to have
Speaker 3: two faces because saying one thing and then immediately saying
Speaker 3: the other, they sink six small running boats. As Trump warns,
Speaker 3: the regime could be quote blown off the face of
Speaker 3: the earth. But remember, the war's over, and he is
Speaker 3: the peace president right now. He is the liar and thief,
Speaker 3: not the commander in chief. So now he has renamed
Speaker 3: his operation Epstein Fury. He's now got a new name
Speaker 3: for it, because you have to have a different war, right,
Speaker 3: that war is over. So let's start the clock again.
Speaker 3: Sixty days on Project Freedom, that's what he's calling it. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we are beyond freedom and dignity, folks. It is a
Speaker 3: pure si op of skinnerresque proportions here. Yeah, a different
Speaker 3: war right, Project Freedom. So the Peace President said, we
Speaker 3: have more weapons and ammunition at a much higher grade
Speaker 3: than we had before you heard him say that. Earlier
Speaker 3: he said, we have the best equipment. We have the
Speaker 3: best stuff all over the world. We have bases all
Speaker 3: over the world. They're all stocked up with equipment. We
Speaker 3: can use all that stuff, and we will if we
Speaker 3: need it. And by the way, we don't have any
Speaker 3: money left over to pave the roads or do anything else.
Speaker 3: The government says that it's really there to build, you know,
Speaker 3: and that's not a purpose of the US government anyway,
Speaker 3: building infrastructure. But nevertheless they taxes to say that that's
Speaker 3: what they're going to do. But instead they have bases
Speaker 3: all over.
Speaker 2: The world, bombs all over the world.
Speaker 3: And they're using those bombs. Any brags that we can
Speaker 3: buy even more of them with your hard earned money.
Speaker 3: We're merely there as a defensive force, said the admiral
Speaker 3: Admiral Cooper talking about the straight up for moves. Are
Speaker 3: you kidding me? Were there simply as a defensive force?
Speaker 3: Does he not remember what happened sixty something days ago.
Speaker 3: We're not defending anything. You are the aggressor, you are
Speaker 3: the attacker. Yeah, we're going to provide defense to commercial shipping.
Speaker 3: After what we started. There are hundreds of ships from
Speaker 3: about eighty seven countries that are stuck in the Persian Gulf.
Speaker 3: And as I said before, usually it's about one hundred
Speaker 3: and fifty or so a day. But they got stuck
Speaker 3: there because it was a surprise attack. We didn't tell anybody.
Speaker 3: We didn't tell our NATO allies because we only have
Speaker 3: one ally that matters, and that's the Zionist Israelis. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they knew they were the ones who did it, and
Speaker 3: we did it back them up. As their a Hedge
Speaker 3: article points out, I said it, you know, from the
Speaker 3: Venezuelan thing with pirates of the Caribbean.
Speaker 2: It really is Trump.
Speaker 3: Now they're saying pirates of the Arabian right, and they
Speaker 3: point out they said quoted Trump again. We talked about
Speaker 3: this yesterday. It's a very profitable business where pirates. American
Speaker 3: naval power in the Arabian Sea is now being used
Speaker 3: in ways that mirror the practices that it was once
Speaker 3: built to suppress. Yeah, we have become what we fought pirates,
Speaker 3: and Israel meanwhile has become what they fought master race Nazis.
Speaker 3: Truly is amazing. Yeah, and I guess we kind of
Speaker 3: forgot what this is all about. And yet you have
Speaker 3: Mark Levin who is raging about doesn't anybody remember the Holocaust? Yeah,
Speaker 3: we do, and you can't forget because you're trying to
Speaker 3: reenact it.
Speaker 2: States you're through the roof.
Speaker 11: Does anybody care about World War two in the Holocaust anymore?
Speaker 2: We're supposed to. You keep reminding us by what you're.
Speaker 11: Doing, Hatanyahu, The Jews got us in this war with Iran.
Speaker 11: The President has said over and over again, bs I
Speaker 11: make the decisions as president of the United States.
Speaker 3: But the Trump, you know, he just unfortunately for Mark Levin,
Speaker 3: these liars just keep getting overtaken by the events of
Speaker 3: the day. Rubio said it. You heard Trump say that
Speaker 3: as well. Oh yeah, they were threatening Israel, so we
Speaker 3: had to do this. We had to do something. They
Speaker 3: drug us into this, said Rubio. They drug us into this,
Speaker 3: said Trump. Mark Levin says, no.
Speaker 2: He didn't.
Speaker 3: He's his own man. He does whatever he wants. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right, and he does whatever we pay him to do.
Speaker 3: So then you have Chris Rawlins, who says this is
Speaker 3: all a very savvy move by Trump, says this sick
Speaker 3: of him. No, it's all just outright lies and prevarications.
Speaker 3: He says, here's the genius plan, right, you should trust
Speaker 3: this plan, he says.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 3: On May the first, Trump says the War Powers letter
Speaker 3: is formally ends hostilities and he preserves forced posture, and
Speaker 3: he asserts Article two constitutional authority. He has absolutely zero
Speaker 3: authority for this. Go back to the fact that he
Speaker 3: cannot take us into war. Nevertheless, he says, May first,
Speaker 3: he puts in the war Powers letter, says, yeah, we
Speaker 3: have ended hostilities. Of course he's lying about that. Then
Speaker 3: on May third, he creates a new thing called Project Freedom,
Speaker 3: which is announced as a humanitarian operation, not as a
Speaker 3: war and not as a military operation. And then on Monday,
Speaker 3: the US Navy escorts neutral ships through there, and it
Speaker 3: all starts again, starts up again. Well, he thinks that
Speaker 3: is pure genius and a savvy legal move. No, it's
Speaker 3: just lies, per varications and hubris. To say this is
Speaker 3: give us a bull faced lie, do something that he
Speaker 3: knows and we know is against the law, and then
Speaker 3: dare people to stop him. He dares people to stop him.
Speaker 3: The deeper problem remains that both sides believe that they
Speaker 3: have won. Washington points the destruction of much of Iran's
Speaker 3: navy and air force and of its missile launching capacity. Well,
Speaker 3: the problem is that's obviously not true, and they just
Speaker 3: showed that yesterday as well. So they have not stopped
Speaker 3: their missile launching capacity Iran. Meanwhile, from their standpoint, they
Speaker 3: think they're winning because they survived a campaign that was
Speaker 3: widely seen as trying to create a regime collapse. And
Speaker 3: the regime has not collapsed, and we haven't taken away
Speaker 3: the missiles either, And they have also then demonstrated their
Speaker 3: ability to strike across the Gulf and into Israel with
Speaker 3: the missiles that Trump and Hexas said they don't have anymore,
Speaker 3: and it has shown that it can place the global
Speaker 3: economy into a chokehold. And so when you're talking about this,
Speaker 3: you know, Trump has been putting out these memes of
Speaker 3: him holding Uno cards and saying we got all the cards,
Speaker 3: We got all the cards. Well, this is a guy
Speaker 3: who held all the cards when he owned the casinos,
Speaker 3: and he still failed. They still went bankrupt, And even
Speaker 3: having all the cards and setting all the casino rules,
Speaker 3: this guy still couldn't win. And so, as zero Hedge
Speaker 3: points out, on either side is holding a strong card. Yeah,
Speaker 3: both of them believe that time is on their side,
Speaker 3: it might look like a manageable situation where it not
Speaker 3: for the oil markets losing roughly ten million barrels a
Speaker 3: day with inventories now running uncomfortably low. That's putting it moderly.
Speaker 3: Trump is facing a binary choice. He can pursue genuine diplomacy. Nah,
Speaker 3: I'm not gonna do that secure the outcome that he wants.
Speaker 3: But that path would provoke resistance from Israel and from
Speaker 3: hawks in Washington. Well, doesn't that tell us who wants
Speaker 3: this war? Who we're fighting for just as much? I mean,
Speaker 3: we have the confessions from Rubio and from Trump. Maybe
Speaker 3: Mark Levin should look at those, but we also know
Speaker 3: that these people are keeping him in it.
Speaker 11: Let me ask you this, if you're general, the admiral,
Speaker 11: if you're giving me advice to the president, isn't the
Speaker 11: goal victory?
Speaker 5: I mean, you can build.
Speaker 11: Up industrial site later, we saw that in World War Two?
Speaker 2: What does victory mean? Isn't the goal to showing everybody
Speaker 2: have to do?
Speaker 11: I mean short of something you know, nuclear weapons and
Speaker 11: that sort of thing.
Speaker 2: And yeah, well, to push the nuclear weapons centers.
Speaker 5: But there are other things.
Speaker 3: Trader, this guy is a worse trader than Jonathan Pollard.
Speaker 3: Be and Pollard have been pushing for nuclear attacks in
Speaker 3: the nuclear wars.
Speaker 11: Ballistic missiles, terrorism, and eliminate the regime. I my attitude
Speaker 11: is this, the only reason they have a nuclear program
Speaker 11: is because of that regime and the only reason I'll
Speaker 11: have the ability to.
Speaker 3: Recon Yeah, well they've got a nuclear program now. And
Speaker 3: what you have done is you've demonstrated to every country
Speaker 3: that the only way that they can avoid being attacked
Speaker 3: by your country, Israel and by the United States is
Speaker 3: to have a nuclear program. So everybody needs it now.
Speaker 3: And Iran is doubling down on this. They had a
Speaker 3: leader that you killed who had put a foot law
Speaker 3: out against nuclear weapons, who had had inspectors in to
Speaker 3: show that they weren't doing nuclear weapons, which Israel will
Speaker 3: not do. Everything about this is a lie. And as
Speaker 3: I said before, this guy, and I think it was
Speaker 3: what his son in law, I think was the one
Speaker 3: who was taking Jonathan Pollard around to Mike Huckabee, mark
Speaker 3: Levin's son in law, and Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard
Speaker 3: have been pushing nuclear war, nuclear war, nuclear war with
Speaker 3: Trump to have Israel use it or to have the
Speaker 3: US do it. That's a total victory. Means for these guys. Well,
Speaker 3: you know, when we look at Trump, he is just pathetic.
Speaker 3: You know, as you look at yesterday, they're putting out
Speaker 3: the White Houses, putting out these garbage memes. Here's one
Speaker 3: of them. Here, look at that Trump in a suit
Speaker 3: of armor, dressed up like the Mandalorian. Give me a break.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 3: You know, we talk about Potus President of the United States.
Speaker 3: We talk about Scotus, the Supreme Court of the United States.
Speaker 3: We even talk about Flotus, First Lady of the United States.
Speaker 3: Maybe we should lump the White House into a category
Speaker 3: and call it codis cosplay of the United States. Because
Speaker 3: these people are heavily into a fantasy world. As a
Speaker 3: matter of fact, he puts out all these heroic memes
Speaker 3: and some other ones that have to do with Star Wars.
Speaker 3: Some people put out Jaba the Trump, which is closer
Speaker 3: to reality. And when he puts out memes that are blasphemous.
Speaker 3: Actually he put this, he retweeted this. One person said
Speaker 3: they're persecuting Trump more than they persecuted him. And they
Speaker 3: show a picture of a representation of Christ on the cross,
Speaker 3: and what they do is they change his face to
Speaker 3: Donald Trump, this is sick, sick, idolatry. I am sick
Speaker 3: of these maga people. Just I'm not going to cut
Speaker 3: a mansic. And so somebody pointed out, well, they keep
Speaker 3: putting out these memes. You know, there's Trump with these
Speaker 3: eagles behind him and his big gun biceps and everything,
Speaker 3: and a wife beater shirt exposes his arms and shoulders.
Speaker 3: They said, but this is the reality on the left side. Yeah,
Speaker 3: he's a seventy eight year old man and there he is,
Speaker 3: without his orange makeup and all the rest of that stuff.
Speaker 2: That is the truth.
Speaker 3: And of course, if you're going to put out, if
Speaker 3: you're going to try to play in these AI wars,
Speaker 3: there's going to be a lot of people are going
Speaker 3: to do a better job than the white real quickly.
Speaker 1: The force binds us.
Speaker 2: Donald, You me the list, there's wat jeffy Epstein.
Speaker 12: Yes, is that really you?
Speaker 2: No, I'm palm Beach Pete. Of course it's me, Jeff.
Speaker 12: The Judaic Council wants me to start World War three.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I can.
Speaker 5: You can't, and you will.
Speaker 2: You are the chosen boy. Donald. Don't look away.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: It's called start Wars Revenge of the JUDI. Yeah, I
Speaker 3: guess what we're gonna say, Dravis.
Speaker 5: I was just going to say that it's probably I
Speaker 5: guarantee you that the Star Wars Disney adults are more
Speaker 5: upset about Trump co opting the Mandalorian than most Christians
Speaker 5: are about him. Oh yeah, retweeting that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you're right. I think you're right. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And you know when is Disney going to come in
Speaker 3: and force their copyright stuff on it?
Speaker 2: Right now?
Speaker 5: I wouldn't mind if Trump went to war with Disney.
Speaker 5: You can go ahead and bomb that place off the
Speaker 5: face of the earth. Won't shed it tear?
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Well as zero Hedge when they talked about pirates of
Speaker 3: the Arabian they say pirates also have a habit of
Speaker 3: breaking deals. Yeah, because Trump has nothing but a liar.
Speaker 3: Over the past year, European policy makers persuaded themselves that
Speaker 3: a durable bargain with the White House is possible. That
Speaker 3: belief produced the Turnbury Deal, a one sided concession that
Speaker 3: was presented as a truce to stabilize the Transatlantic trade Well.
Speaker 3: This weekend, Trump said that he will raise its Section
Speaker 3: two thirty two terrafts on European car imports back to
Speaker 3: twenty five percent from what was agreed upon just you know,
Speaker 3: a couple of months ago. They agreed that it would
Speaker 3: be fifteen percent when they did the Turnbury deal. Now
Speaker 3: he's just arbitrarily taking it up to twenty five percent. This, folks,
Speaker 3: is why we have the restrictions. We don't want to
Speaker 3: allow one person to set tax rates or terras rates
Speaker 3: because terris oar taxes. We don't want one person to
Speaker 3: be able to drag us into war because when you
Speaker 3: look at what Trump is doing, he is a one
Speaker 3: man destruction team. And it's because the Congress, especially the
Speaker 3: Republican Party, has just given him the keys to everything.
Speaker 3: Do whatever you want. There's no restrictions on anything that
Speaker 3: you want to do. The Founders created a framework where
Speaker 3: you don't allow all power to reside in one person.
Speaker 3: Trump wants it is people want it for him. The
Speaker 3: Republican politicians wanted for him, and he's bragged about it.
Speaker 3: I'm going to be a dictator, but I'll be a
Speaker 3: good dictator, and I'm going to do it for a
Speaker 3: few days. And he's done it. He continues to do it.
Speaker 3: He's never going to stop underlining how little its own
Speaker 3: deals constrain it. Now we're talking about the Trump regime,
Speaker 3: is it okay? It's about this guy, this guy who
Speaker 3: is a liar, a thief, a trader to his family,
Speaker 3: to his wives, as well as to his country. I
Speaker 3: said that about him to begin with. I said, the
Speaker 3: man is faithless to his promises to his wife in
Speaker 3: a way that we typically don't see it. I said
Speaker 3: that before when he was running in the primaries. I said,
Speaker 3: you know, you look at the pride parades and it
Speaker 3: was kind of interesting because most of the time people
Speaker 3: are not proud of their sin, but they were with
Speaker 3: their gay pride parades. But I said, you know, you
Speaker 3: don't typically have parades where people parade. You don't have
Speaker 3: an adultery pride parade, right unless you're Donald Trump. If
Speaker 3: you're Donald Trump, you do make a parade out of
Speaker 3: your adultery. You do make a parade out of kicking
Speaker 3: your wife to the curb, which is what he did.
Speaker 3: And of course they did a movie about that, The
Speaker 3: First Wives Club, which was a dig at Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Just like back in the Future was a day get
Speaker 2: him with Biff.
Speaker 3: We got the guy that people have been making movies
Speaker 3: about directly and indirectly as a scoundrel. He is the
Speaker 3: guy he was in the White House.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Well, the bottom line is what the Europeans need to
Speaker 3: learn is that you cannot appease tyrants and aggressors. Trump
Speaker 3: was a tyrant and aggressor economically with the teriff stuff
Speaker 3: before he became one with hot wars. Again, the lesson
Speaker 3: of Greenland episode says zero Edge is that this tyrant
Speaker 3: responds more to firmness than to appeasement. That's my word, tyrant.
Speaker 3: They said this administration, it's not an administration, it's a
Speaker 3: tyrant with his regime. Europe has options as well, though.
Speaker 3: It has a list of ninety three billion euros and
Speaker 3: retaliatory tariffs that were suspended after Turnberry. So if Trump
Speaker 3: is going to then ignore that deal and say, well,
Speaker 3: instead of fifteen percent, we're going to jump it up
Speaker 3: to twenty five percent because he didn't like something somebody
Speaker 3: said about him or to him, they've got weapons that
Speaker 3: they could use as well. It also has the anti
Speaker 3: coercion instrument, the so called trade Bazouka, which allows restrictions
Speaker 3: on US investment, even the withdrawal of intellectual property protection.
Speaker 3: So the question is whether Europe is willing to follow
Speaker 3: China's lead on this. But again, Trump's sanctions and his
Speaker 3: tariffs were and remain acts of war. He can't be
Speaker 3: trusted with a treaty. He can't be trusted to negotiate
Speaker 3: in good faith, and this is why this war is
Speaker 3: going to continue to drag on. The Iranians aren't fools.
Speaker 3: They understand that. They said, why would we bother to
Speaker 3: even talk to this guy? We can't believe anything they
Speaker 3: say as we're talking to them. They're doing the Israeli
Speaker 3: trick of the Judai mind, trick of let's have some negotiations. Meanwhile,
Speaker 3: they assassinate the negotiators. They use that as an opportunity
Speaker 3: to do a sneak attack. So Trump is withdrawing five
Speaker 3: thousand troops from Germany, part of the thirty seven thousand
Speaker 3: that are still stationed there. So he's taking it down
Speaker 3: by about twelve and a half percent, right about one
Speaker 3: eighth or whatever. But the reality is is that even
Speaker 3: though Trump wants an empire, even though he wants to
Speaker 3: be the only power around, when he pulls troops out
Speaker 3: of Germany, as a zero Hedges pointing out, he basically
Speaker 3: is working against what he wants. I'm glad to see
Speaker 3: the troops coming out. I don't want to see America
Speaker 3: be an empire, but he does, and he appears to
Speaker 3: see these forces that are there mainly to protect Germany.
Speaker 3: In reality, though the bases exist to allow the US
Speaker 3: to project power into Europe, the Middle East, and Africa,
Speaker 3: their removal would weaken America's strategic reach. It would weaken
Speaker 3: the empire. So I think that's a good thing, but
Speaker 3: it's not what he wants to do. He doesn't want
Speaker 3: to week in his empire, but his actions are doing it.
Speaker 3: He's a fool. He's not just a traitor. He's not
Speaker 3: you know, he's not a genius by any sense of
Speaker 3: the word. Well, we're going to take a quick break
Speaker 3: because I want to move on to this other stuff.
Speaker 3: And I spend enough time on on war. I could
Speaker 3: spend the entire program on it if I let myself.
Speaker 5: There is a lot of war news. We do have
Speaker 5: a lot of comments though we have hatch Car sixty
Speaker 5: one says, are you familiar with the Schofield Bible?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, oh yeah, absolutely, yeah, I know the you know,
Speaker 3: I said to somebody the other day, it's like I
Speaker 3: have no interest in going over with the fine tooth
Speaker 3: comb my differences of people over eschatology. But I think
Speaker 3: there is a fundamental flaw in the dispensationalism that focuses
Speaker 3: on Israel, and it has now become the main focus
Speaker 3: because of the Schofield Bible. And I've talked about it.
Speaker 3: I've had Chuck Baldwin on, who talks a lot about
Speaker 3: it and its origins and where it came from. But
Speaker 3: whenever you look, whenever you got an error, it always
Speaker 3: has real consequences. And now what we're seeing is that
Speaker 3: this dispensationalism has been has metastasized into support for Zionism,
Speaker 3: which the two of them are completely different things. Of course,
Speaker 3: dispensationalism is a framework for which people use to try
Speaker 3: to understand the Bible. I disagree with that framework. But
Speaker 3: now what has happened is that it puts so much
Speaker 3: emphasis on Israel that it removes that emphasis from Christ
Speaker 3: and it's resulting in an idolatry of a political state.
Speaker 3: That's what Zionism is about. So you can't even criticize
Speaker 3: that political state without now being charged with being anti
Speaker 3: Semitic or racist or whatever. But the real issue with
Speaker 3: this is that it is idolatry and it is focused
Speaker 3: on It misrepresents Christ's work, it misrepresents who the chosen
Speaker 3: people of God are. The chosen people are not determined
Speaker 3: by genealogy. That was clear made very clear in the
Speaker 3: New Testament. It's the people of faith who are God's
Speaker 3: chosen people. And faith and what faith and who faith
Speaker 3: in Christ. That's what makes people God's chosen people. And
Speaker 3: so it is a misdirection that is having some really
Speaker 3: horrible fruit, even in politics and war, but it has
Speaker 3: had horrible spiritual fruit as well. So, Yeah, unfortunately, I'm
Speaker 3: familiar with it. Yes, we're all a little bit too
Speaker 3: familiar with it.
Speaker 2: Not a fan.
Speaker 5: Patty Wack says, what's so bad is that the people
Speaker 5: contributing so many of the polks at Trump are equal
Speaker 5: total scum, communist stone revolutionaries, others just seeking power for themselves.
Speaker 2: Truck Schumer for example.
Speaker 3: Yeah, every word that he said that I read for
Speaker 3: it was absolutely true. And that's one of the things
Speaker 3: that Trump is doing. He is strengthening the Democrat Marxists
Speaker 3: that are out there, and that's you know, maybe maybe
Speaker 3: that's part of the point.
Speaker 5: Go ahead, Yeah, communist Stone revolutionaries, others just seeking power
Speaker 5: for themselves. None of these people give a flip about you, me, liberty, freedom.
Speaker 5: They just want power and fame as well. That's right,
Speaker 5: and that's why you would never see me out at
Speaker 5: one of these No Kings protests. The vast majority of
Speaker 5: these are mentally stunted leftists that would immediately seize power
Speaker 5: and put the boot on your throat worse than anyone
Speaker 5: else would.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: The most authoritarian obnoxious person you can imagine is a
Speaker 5: middle aged woman on SSRIs that wants you dead and
Speaker 5: would laugh if you died.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, when you when you protest one timent,
Speaker 3: you got to be careful that you are not enabling another.
Speaker 3: That's the bottom line.
Speaker 5: So yeah, Guard Goldsmith, and of course you can find
Speaker 5: Guard at Liberty Conspiracy six pm on Rumble and Twitter.
Speaker 5: Go check him out. Says Curiously, Hegseth total a reporter
Speaker 5: yesterday that the US wasn't acting based on Israel's intentions,
Speaker 5: Yet the Trumpers also said they acted because they thought
Speaker 5: Israel would attack in Iran would respond.
Speaker 3: Well, he just lie. Everything the guy says is a liar.
Speaker 3: It's just like Trump. I mean, we actually go out
Speaker 3: of our mind if we set there trying to analyze
Speaker 3: every single lie coming out of the mouth of Pete
Speaker 3: hegg Seth and Donald Trump. Let's just understand their liars.
Speaker 3: Let's understand that Pete hegg Seth, in no way, shape
Speaker 3: or form is following Christ or representing his teachings, and
Speaker 3: he has nothing to do with the Constitution or the
Speaker 3: principles that America has founded on, and neither does Trump.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we have anigos Sonita the US slash Israel fun
Speaker 5: training created Tomas Taliban, m ek al Qaeda isis. But
Speaker 5: Iran is the biggest sponsor of terrorism.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3: And how many people as Israel attack versus how many
Speaker 3: people have countries as Irana.
Speaker 5: Tai Yeah, I'd like to see that list. Audi m
Speaker 5: r R. Very generous, Thank you, Thank you, really appreciate it,
Speaker 5: says good morning, David Knight and family. And he says Audi,
Speaker 5: modern retro radio dot com. You go check out modern
Speaker 5: Retro radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Sydney Falco says, I watched my dad struggle with illegals
Speaker 5: in the construction industry, so he pushed me to become
Speaker 5: a software engineer, and I watched the h one bs
Speaker 5: outsourcing take my work under the guise of AI.
Speaker 3: That's right, actually Indians, because that's what they do, and
Speaker 3: a lot of this early stuff, they have an army
Speaker 3: of low paid workers in other countries that you know
Speaker 3: they're not. You don't have AI that's setting there totaling
Speaker 3: up the stuff that you're putting in your grocery cart.
Speaker 3: It was actually that Amazon claimed it was actually a
Speaker 3: bunch of Indians who were being paid to watch everything
Speaker 3: she did and total it up. So yeah, it is uh.
Speaker 3: And of course, you know, we keep being reminded. As
Speaker 3: I played the clips yesterday, Ben Shapiro said, Hey, we
Speaker 3: need these h one B people because you Americans just
Speaker 3: aren't good enough, and we're going to come and take
Speaker 3: your country away from you, just like we've done in
Speaker 3: so many other places. And if you can't afford to
Speaker 3: live here, maybe you should go somewhere else. We've got
Speaker 3: to get over this notion just because you were born
Speaker 3: in America that you have any birthright to be here.
Speaker 3: This actually belongs to Ben Shapiro and his pals, and
Speaker 3: they're gonna make sure you understand that I have nothing
Speaker 3: but contempt for these globalists to come here from other
Speaker 3: countries whose loyalty is not to America. They despise Americans,
Speaker 3: and they despise the principles this country was built on.
Speaker 3: People like Mark Levan exhibit A. This guy, and he
Speaker 3: always talks about liberty, liberty, liberty. He's not about liberty
Speaker 3: at all. He is a lying killer for another country.
Speaker 2: He's a trader.
Speaker 5: Also, I just got to ask, how many Americans do
Speaker 5: we have to sacrifice to help Israel over the course
Speaker 5: of years, you know, I you know, they come to
Speaker 5: the door ands like, no, sorry, we already gave. We
Speaker 5: already did that. America is the one that finished World
Speaker 5: War two. Yeah, that's right, We're done. If Israel cannot
Speaker 5: defend itself at this point, then.
Speaker 3: Well andy, ex does anybody remember the Holocaust and all
Speaker 3: the rest of this stuff?
Speaker 5: And it's like, how could we forget? We get a
Speaker 5: movie about it every year.
Speaker 3: That's right, and you talk about it every single day,
Speaker 3: and that's your excuse to kill everybody else. And you
Speaker 3: have become the Nazi monsters that you fought, Your chosen
Speaker 3: people are now the master race, and everybody else has
Speaker 3: to bow before you or be killed. We don't have
Speaker 3: any rights because we're not human according to you. So yeah,
Speaker 3: let's where are we done with comments?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 5: We still got more ap Rumble Seat says, let's secure
Speaker 5: the Middle East for Israel, well, destroying world economies, ramping
Speaker 5: up famine and energy shortages to finish the controlled demolition.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And Tony Salvo does Hegseth think this is call of duty?
Speaker 5: You can't just pause the war that we started and
Speaker 5: has killed innocent people.
Speaker 9: Lol.
Speaker 5: Our biggest issue though, is arresting Komi, not Lipnik, Gates, Bauci,
Speaker 5: et cetera.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I know he actually he does think this is
Speaker 3: call of do All of life is a video game
Speaker 3: for this guy, It really is.
Speaker 5: And pezid Avante seventeen seventy six. There is only one
Speaker 5: thing worse than an ultra zionist warmonger. A compromised ultrazionist
Speaker 5: warmonger and empowered Solution says, Oh, David, why are you
Speaker 5: torturing us with Mark Levin?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 2: I got to watch him. You gotta watch him too, So,
Speaker 2: but we're done with the Mark.
Speaker 5: Levin suffer one, suffer all.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we're done with the Mark Levin clips. We're going
Speaker 3: to get into this new society. This new panoptagon prison
Speaker 3: that they're building for us, one act at a time,
Speaker 3: will be right back.
Speaker 13: Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression.
Speaker 13: In our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
Speaker 13: purely an abstract principle. Here it is, however, not nearly
Speaker 13: so abstract, as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved
Speaker 13: here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will
Speaker 13: monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Speaker 9: Tomorrow it will.
Speaker 2: Be something else. Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to
Speaker 2: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 14: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 14: wherever you go.
Speaker 3: Well, a Senate panel has back to what they call
Speaker 3: the Guard Act. It's not a Guard Goldstein. God was
Speaker 3: going to do an act. It'd be a good one.
Speaker 3: I would go with his act. This is a horrible
Speaker 3: one and it is a bipartisan move to do yet
Speaker 3: again age verification for yet another item that we use
Speaker 3: on a daily basis. They're using this new disruptive technology
Speaker 3: to disrupt our constitution, disrupt our liberty, as our freedom
Speaker 3: and our dignity and to make us if we're going
Speaker 3: to participate in these new technologies, we're going to have
Speaker 3: to do all kinds of jump through, all kinds of
Speaker 3: identification hoops and anonymity and all.
Speaker 2: The rest of this stuff. So this is.
Speaker 3: Now going to bring age verification to the use of AI.
Speaker 3: And so this is something to put out by Josh Hollywood.
Speaker 3: As I pointed out, it's you know, some of the
Speaker 3: most conservative Republicans and some of the most liberal Democrats
Speaker 3: have all joined forces with this because what they all
Speaker 3: want is a police surveillance state. That's what they're going
Speaker 3: to get. The framing is supposedly to protect children, as
Speaker 3: they always do, right, But the result is going to
Speaker 3: be age verification, digital ID for everyone, a permission society,
Speaker 3: and we'll get rid of cash and all the rest
Speaker 3: of this stuff as well. So what it means is
Speaker 3: that you're going to have to have a government ID
Speaker 3: or have to upload a facial scan or some other
Speaker 3: kind of biometric information, are a financial record that is
Speaker 3: tied to your legal name in order for you to
Speaker 3: use artificial intelligence. We've seen this happening over and over again.
Speaker 3: Social media was the first one. Then they're talking about
Speaker 3: operating systems and things like that. Now artificial intelligence, all
Speaker 3: of it, every user of every covered chat pot, we
Speaker 3: need to hand one of those over before being allowed in.
Speaker 3: And look, we understand how dangerous AI psychosis can be.
Speaker 3: We were just talking the other day about Richard Dawkins,
Speaker 3: an adult, a guy who purports to be a scientist,
Speaker 3: although I never believed that he was a scientist. The
Speaker 3: Dawkins delusion of saying that he's got science on this side,
Speaker 3: when science is actually disproving what he is saying, science
Speaker 3: and math. But nevertheless, you got everybody from Richard Dawkins
Speaker 3: to young kids who are being taken in by AI
Speaker 3: and think that it is it is something that is
Speaker 3: sentient and conscious, conscious and so forth. And so I
Speaker 3: understand what the danger is, but there are other ways
Speaker 3: to approach this, and it's clearly a mcguffin that is
Speaker 3: happening here. We see that, you know, they identify a
Speaker 3: real problem or they make up an imaginary problem. But
Speaker 3: the bottom line is is that they're always using these problems,
Speaker 3: real or imagined for their same end.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: Just so we were saying about the climate, mcguffin starts
Speaker 3: out as global cooling, then it jumps to global warming.
Speaker 3: Then it's now jumping back to global cooling. According to
Speaker 3: al Gore, but it doesn't matter whether we're going to
Speaker 3: turn into a block of ice or whether everything is
Speaker 3: going to melt. We still have these same solutions. That
Speaker 3: means that you've got to get their permission to do everything.
Speaker 3: You're going to have all kinds of activities banned, as
Speaker 3: well as the kinds of food that you want to eat.
Speaker 3: It's all about total control, and they're all always come
Speaker 3: up with some kind of an emergency, some kind you know,
Speaker 3: which is what Trump is always doing. Well, we got
Speaker 3: an emergency reel or imagined, so now I've got the
Speaker 3: ability to issue executive orders and act like a king. No,
Speaker 3: but this is what they're both doing, bipartisan Democrats and Republicans.
Speaker 3: The bill defines an artificial intelligence chat bot as any
Speaker 3: service that produces new, expressive content or responses that are
Speaker 3: not fully predetermined by the developer or operator, and that
Speaker 3: accepts open ended, natural language or multimodal user input. This reaches, however,
Speaker 3: way beyond the idea of just a chatbot. You will
Speaker 3: also cover service bots, search assistance powered by AI, homework
Speaker 3: helpers general purpose tools millions of adults already used without
Speaker 3: proving who they are. So by the kind of language
Speaker 3: that they have here, it is by extension, going to
Speaker 3: have a massive reach. And I'm going to give you
Speaker 3: an example of this and how this actually works against
Speaker 3: efforts to protect kids. Senator Richard Blumenthal signed on the bill,
Speaker 3: along with Senators Mark Warner, Chris Murphy, Katie Britt and
Speaker 3: Mark Kelly. So again we see some of the most
Speaker 3: conservatives as well as some of the most liberal people
Speaker 3: signing onto this because this is a bipartisan mcguffin to
Speaker 3: turn us into a permission society for the purposes of
Speaker 3: surveillance and a police state. The bill includes data minimization
Speaker 3: and language. It also requires periodic reverification, which means that
Speaker 3: you'll have to go through this process even after you're
Speaker 3: told them, You'll have to go through the process again
Speaker 3: and again. So want to just be a one time process.
Speaker 3: All of these options are surveillance infrastructure, as we claim.
Speaker 3: The Net points out, they say they want to safeguard
Speaker 3: Americans' most secured documents. Well, if you want to do that,
Speaker 3: you need to reject this guard Act. It would force
Speaker 3: AI companies to collect and to store highly sensitive personal
Speaker 3: data into honeypots that are ripe for cyber criminals to
Speaker 3: exploit through breaches through identity theft and fraud. And I'm
Speaker 3: not worried so much about the cyber criminals as I
Speaker 3: am the government criminals. We'll be using all of this information.
Speaker 3: Age verification vendors have been breached repeatedly, exposing the government
Speaker 3: IDs and biometric scans of millions of users who handed
Speaker 3: them over in order to access entirely legal content. The
Speaker 3: guard Act would multiply those targets by routing every AI
Speaker 3: interaction in the country through similar collection systems. If a
Speaker 3: teenager is asking a chatbot for algebra help, they would
Speaker 3: need to be cleared through age verification, and so with
Speaker 3: the adult setting next to them. A customer trying to
Speaker 3: fix a billing problem through a customer through a company's
Speaker 3: automated assistance would face the same identity check. And so,
Speaker 3: as this AI is metastasizing throughout all these different systems,
Speaker 3: now they want to use that very because it is
Speaker 3: metastasizing through everything. They want to use that as a
Speaker 3: hook to force you to give them an ID, saying well,
Speaker 3: we have kids who are interacting with this and it
Speaker 3: can be dangerous for them, and so there'd be ways
Speaker 3: that we could do that. But they didn't even care
Speaker 3: about parntal opinions because you can't get around that with
Speaker 3: a printal permission slip. So they're not going to let
Speaker 3: parents decide either. There is a one hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 3: per offense penalty, which basically is going to shut out
Speaker 3: smaller developers. Just like we talked about the operating systems
Speaker 3: and other things that were happening out there, you're going
Speaker 3: to the purpose of all these things, the big finds
Speaker 3: and everything is to make sure that they're not going
Speaker 3: to have any competition from new people, from smaller people.
Speaker 3: They're going to outlaw that. It'll still happen, but it'll
Speaker 3: be black market and it'll be everybody will be always
Speaker 3: facing the threat of arrest.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 3: This is just as we always see with regulation. It's
Speaker 3: always the large companies that will be helped by this
Speaker 3: because they'll be able to absorb all of this verification
Speaker 3: infrastructure cost and it will push the other people out.
Speaker 3: You know, we saw this with the with what Elizabeth
Speaker 3: Warren did with banks, for example, right after the two
Speaker 3: thousand and eight crisis. It's like, well, we need to
Speaker 3: really tighten this up. We need to have a lot
Speaker 3: more paperwork for people to be able to get a loan.
Speaker 3: And what they did was that basically made it impossible
Speaker 3: for some the small banks and lenders to issue mortgage loans,
Speaker 3: and they started going out of business and all that.
Speaker 3: The extra regulations, the extra paperwork was something the big
Speaker 3: companies could comply with, but the smaller ones could not.
Speaker 3: So it's basically bankruptcy by regulation, and that's what we're
Speaker 3: looking at here for people who would compete against the
Speaker 3: biggest AI people who are out there. The bill isn't
Speaker 3: promoting parental supervision either. The legislation contains no parental consent
Speaker 3: mechanism that would let a parent decide their fifteen year
Speaker 3: old can use a homework chatbot. Which I'm fine with that,
Speaker 3: but consider the fact that you've got Milania out there
Speaker 3: pushing AI on kids. This is going to be the
Speaker 3: basis of education. Well, if it becomes the basis of education,
Speaker 3: and it could, but what it would also require because
Speaker 3: of this, it would be the basis of kids being
Speaker 3: trained most importantly from an early age that there is
Speaker 3: nothing they can be done anonymously, that they will identify
Speaker 3: themselves to government for every single activity they want to do.
Speaker 3: And I've said this about the metal detectors and schools,
Speaker 3: the lockdown stuff that was happening. I said when it
Speaker 3: was happening in the nineteen nineties, I said, the conditioning
Speaker 3: people for a police state. And then what do we see.
Speaker 3: We see Trump in twenty twenty doing a lockdown of
Speaker 3: the entire country and a lot of the people who
Speaker 3: were most complicit with all that were the younger generation
Speaker 3: who had been going through all these different lockdown rules,
Speaker 3: metal detectors, and all the rest of this stuff, which
Speaker 3: started well before nine to eleven. They were conditioning people
Speaker 3: for the police state that they had planned. So Marshall
Speaker 3: Blackburn again is back. She has not seen anything that
Speaker 3: has to do with AI, crypto or a digital idea
Speaker 3: that she doesn't love. She says she's going to fold
Speaker 3: the Guard Act into her bill, but she calls the
Speaker 3: Trump Act the Trump AI Act, and she is a
Speaker 3: very scary person. She's going to be our next governor
Speaker 3: here in Tennessee. I adamantly oppose Marshall Blackburn. You know,
Speaker 3: she rose to fame because she asked that question of
Speaker 3: Katanji brown Jackson and the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, she said,
Speaker 3: what is a woman? And of course brown Jackson, you know,
Speaker 3: I can't really tell you what a woman is, and
Speaker 3: I don't really know what a woman is. And so
Speaker 3: Marcia Blackburn got a lot of traction out of that.
Speaker 3: Somebody needs to ask Marcia Blackburn what is tyranny? Because
Speaker 3: she is as clueless unless she is, you know. And
Speaker 3: again Katanji brown Jackson was not clueless. She fully knew
Speaker 3: what she was doing. And Marcia Blackburn fully knows what
Speaker 3: she is doing as well. So she's we're going to
Speaker 3: push this Guard Act. She's actually going to fold it
Speaker 3: into her Trump AI Act. The infrastructure being authorized will
Speaker 3: not check whether a user is a child before it
Speaker 3: asks for their ID, So it is going to be
Speaker 3: for everybody. They say they're doing it for the children,
Speaker 3: but they're going to do it to everybody. And as
Speaker 3: they point out and reclaim the net, I'm sure that's
Speaker 3: what the bill was actually designed to do. Anyway, So
Speaker 3: Malania pushes AI on the kids at school. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 3: kids at school are being pushed all of you know,
Speaker 3: you talk about AI being harmful. What about school when
Speaker 3: they're getting gas lit and told that they're in the
Speaker 3: wrong body. Does AI do that any worse than the
Speaker 3: schools do? And yet they're not going to stop that.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, this is all just part
Speaker 3: of it. They're going to require permission and ID to
Speaker 3: use it, just like they want to have permission an
Speaker 3: ID to use transportation. They want permission and ID to
Speaker 3: use banking, permission and ID to use the Internet, to
Speaker 3: use social media, you name it. They want permission and
Speaker 3: ID to do everything. This is why. You know, when
Speaker 3: I had the interview with Sheriff Mac, I didn't get
Speaker 3: into it with him, but he said, you know, he's
Speaker 3: talking about the security failures for this White House press
Speaker 3: conference dinner thing. He said, yeah, it all started because
Speaker 3: this guy was able to travel on a train with guns.
Speaker 3: It's like, well, you know, I just mentioned how fruitless
Speaker 3: all the TSA security was. But look, folks, we're going
Speaker 3: to not fall into the trap that our lives need
Speaker 3: to be surveilled and that we need to have permission.
Speaker 3: If you go back and look at before they started
Speaker 3: all the Cuban hijackings, if you go back and look
Speaker 3: at what happened prior to that. You could go onto
Speaker 3: a plane with a gun. If you're going to go
Speaker 3: on a hunting trip a hunting pheasant in South Dakota,
Speaker 3: you can put the the you can bring your rifle
Speaker 3: with you and they'd store it up there for you
Speaker 3: in the in the co area. We have become absolutely
Speaker 3: insane over these various things, and it's all being done
Speaker 3: to push a police state. I'm perfectly fine with people
Speaker 3: being able to travel on a train without having to
Speaker 3: prove that they are innocent to some tsa bureaucrat goon.
Speaker 3: That's just I got to make work job that is
Speaker 3: out there theatrically trying to make people feel safe. Well, again,
Speaker 3: to sum this all up and reason sums it up,
Speaker 3: it is a trojan horse for universal online ID checks,
Speaker 3: and we have one trojan horse after the other. Again,
Speaker 3: when we look at this massive number of bills that
Speaker 3: are coming out, every one of them trying to take
Speaker 3: these new technologies and use them as leverage and as
Speaker 3: an excuse to require ID to end anonymity. And of
Speaker 3: course they're also the technocrafts are also using this regulation
Speaker 3: as a means of solidifying their their fascist merger with
Speaker 3: government and also keeping out their competition. Right, all of
Speaker 3: these things are happening at once. And we see this
Speaker 3: with so many different things. I mean, we've got the
Speaker 3: Genius Act for Crypto, the Clarity Act, which I'm going
Speaker 3: to talk about here in just a moment put together.
Speaker 3: So you've got a couple of different acts that are
Speaker 3: about crypto and how it's going to be used. And
Speaker 3: then you've got the Genesis Act, which I think of
Speaker 3: as Genesis six. It's kind of an epilem here that's
Speaker 3: being composed on us. But you got the Genesis six Act,
Speaker 3: you got the Trump AI Act, and now you've got
Speaker 3: this Guard Act, and all these things are pulling together
Speaker 3: to weaponize AI against us and to force us to
Speaker 3: have ID and to lose anonymity. Unlike some of the
Speaker 3: social media age verification bills, this would give parents no
Speaker 3: right to opt out of the rules from the federal
Speaker 3: government sets on their kids use of technology. And that's
Speaker 3: the key thing about it. And so they break it
Speaker 3: down to about five points. They said, first of all,
Speaker 3: it would ban kids from using friendly AI.
Speaker 2: And again I.
Speaker 3: Don't like the idea of kids using AI at all,
Speaker 3: but I think that that can be handled by I
Speaker 3: think they can be handled by parents and should be
Speaker 3: handled by parents. And quite frankly, look, let's understand that
Speaker 3: if the parents are going to let kids do certain things,
Speaker 3: you're not going to be able to overcome that with
Speaker 3: a government I had a sister who taught for decades,
Speaker 3: and she said, I can always tell how a kid's
Speaker 3: going to do when I talk to the parents, because
Speaker 3: of the parents are not involved in this, even in
Speaker 3: a government school situation. If they're not involved in this,
Speaker 3: if they're not actively participating in the child's education, child's
Speaker 3: not going to do well. But if they are, they
Speaker 3: will do well. And so I used to point that
Speaker 3: out to my friends about homeschooling. I said, so, what
Speaker 3: is that telling you about homeschooling. If you care about
Speaker 3: your kids education enough that you would homeschool them, they're
Speaker 3: going to do well enough. But if you're just going
Speaker 3: to go with whatever the default, no effort thing is
Speaker 3: out there, they're not going to do that well. And
Speaker 3: so when you look at what can happen with this,
Speaker 3: and let me talk about let's stop this for a
Speaker 3: second and talk about some unintended consequences that are out
Speaker 3: there and This is when we look at a new
Speaker 3: US phone network being set up for Christians, right, and
Speaker 3: they say, well, we're going to block porn and gender
Speaker 3: related content. So let's think about that, because this is
Speaker 3: basically why josh Ollie's trying to do. I've got some
Speaker 3: bad content out there. Whatever it is, he defines it
Speaker 3: as artificial intelligence. The Christians are defining it as pornography
Speaker 3: and gender confusion stuff, right, And so what they're saying is,
Speaker 3: we're going to set up a cell phone network and
Speaker 3: for the first time, we'll block this content at the
Speaker 3: network level.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: People have always had different programs that parents could use
Speaker 3: to block this stuff on a device level, right, So
Speaker 3: you could set up some programs on if you got
Speaker 3: your kid's got a computer, you could set up some
Speaker 3: programs on the computer, or if you foolishly buy them
Speaker 3: a phone, you could block it on the phone as well.
Speaker 3: So now they're saying we'll do it. We're going to
Speaker 3: piggyback this on top of T mobiles network and we
Speaker 3: will do it at the network level. And so when
Speaker 3: you look at what they're using for this, what they're
Speaker 3: doing is they're creating a master list of websites and
Speaker 3: they're just blocking you from going to those particular websites,
Speaker 3: which I don't think is a very effective way to
Speaker 3: do it, and it is problematic for them as well.
Speaker 3: You know, they've got to constantly be out there trying
Speaker 3: to find when somebody has created a new website or
Speaker 3: they've created an alias for that website they just renamed
Speaker 3: it or something. So that's not a very effective way
Speaker 3: to do it. It's a very high maintenance way to do
Speaker 3: it as well. And a good example of one of
Speaker 3: the problems that they have is Yale. So Yale is
Speaker 3: set up as an educational website and they don't block that,
Speaker 3: but Yale has an LGBT thing that they push because
Speaker 3: they have set that up as a different domain name.
Speaker 3: These people can block that, but they say, well, we
Speaker 3: don't really know what we're going to do. If Yale
Speaker 3: brings that other website into their primary website, then that
Speaker 3: creates something of an issue for us, right, And so
Speaker 3: again they have to constantly look at this. They can't
Speaker 3: handle all of the aliases that around there, so it's
Speaker 3: not really I think a very effective way to do this.
Speaker 3: What would be an effective way to do it? An
Speaker 3: effective way to do This would be the same way
Speaker 3: they do AI moderation. Right, if you're trying to and
Speaker 3: there's a lot of talk about this, you know, taking
Speaker 3: on X. You know you'll see people say put up
Speaker 3: a picture and say m groc change her clothes or whatever,
Speaker 3: take her clothes off or whatever, and they can moderate
Speaker 3: that kind of thing. They can moderate what people are
Speaker 3: putting up. So the AI looks at the image and says,
Speaker 3: this is an image I'm not going to accept. You
Speaker 3: could stop it. At that level, you could block both
Speaker 3: the content where they're pushing LGBT stuff as well as
Speaker 3: when they're pushing porn. AI could be used to block that,
Speaker 3: but not if the Guard Act goes through. Think about
Speaker 3: that because if you're going to use AI to block
Speaker 3: this stuff, and technically that would be illegal according to
Speaker 3: Josh Holly's Guard Act, and his whole point was to
Speaker 3: try to remove harmful content before it got to kids.
Speaker 3: And so by saying lumping all this AI stuff, even
Speaker 3: AI agents that are doing things for you, lumping all
Speaker 3: that stuff together, that basically cut that off. But if
Speaker 3: something needs to be done by individuals, something needs to
Speaker 3: be done by parents, it's not something needs to be
Speaker 3: done by government to begin with.
Speaker 5: I mentioned this before, but you know, I've got many
Speaker 5: friends that you know, I grew up in the church with,
Speaker 5: went to you know, we would share many of the
Speaker 5: same sort of beliefs about you know, religion and politics.
Speaker 5: And they went off to college and all of a sudden, oh,
Speaker 5: they're completely on the other new spectrum. Maybe they've even
Speaker 5: gone trans or gender fluid. College is set up as
Speaker 5: a propaganda machine, and they are very very good at it.
Speaker 2: That's right, it is.
Speaker 3: And usually usually they get at the kids at an
Speaker 3: earlier age. I've seen a lot of parents who all
Speaker 3: homeschool and say, well, I'm going to homeschool, but now
Speaker 3: that they're in high school, I'm going to put them
Speaker 3: in the regular school. Well, good luck with that, and
Speaker 3: maybe that'll work and maybe it won't. But the same
Speaker 3: thing is true even at the college age level. Right,
Speaker 3: So what you're talking about, you protect kids all the
Speaker 3: way up to college age level, and they still have
Speaker 3: ways to propaganda issue.
Speaker 2: It's very devious what they do.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's my opinion what they're best at. Yeah, I've
Speaker 5: made this point before, but you know, we had friends
Speaker 5: that like, well, I won't let my kids play Pokemon
Speaker 5: or get Pokemon cards because it pushes evolution, and then
Speaker 5: they send their kids to a public school where they
Speaker 5: are literally taught evolution as a fact. If you're going
Speaker 5: to do that, you're just ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, you know the problem is is that you've
Speaker 3: got people like Pete Hegsath who says, let's be the
Speaker 3: lord who trains my hands for warfare and my fingers
Speaker 3: for combat or what right, And yet he thinks that's
Speaker 3: about attacking Iran. No, it's about spiritual warfare. Spiritual warfare
Speaker 3: is when they come after your mind. Okay, and that's
Speaker 3: the reality. But we're left defenseless because we're thinking in
Speaker 3: terms of literal weapons and literally killing people. So the
Speaker 3: banning kids from using friendly AI, that's one example of
Speaker 3: the consequences, which is I think an interesting idea, but
Speaker 3: it faces some real issues in terms of the implementation
Speaker 3: that they could use AI to do that, but it would
Speaker 3: be banned because of Josh Holly's misguided do gooderrism. Secondly,
Speaker 3: it takes away parental rights. There's another example of this,
Speaker 3: but of course the government, even conservatives don't care about
Speaker 3: parntal rights. They give it lip service, but even they
Speaker 3: believe that it takes a village to raise a child,
Speaker 3: and they are the village. And so it always comes
Speaker 3: back to just shut up, will decide when your kid
Speaker 3: gets taught sex and what they get taught about sex.
Speaker 3: As I've said many times, I remember back in the eighties,
Speaker 3: the fight was over having a standard sex education class
Speaker 3: about the birds and bees giving that to eight year
Speaker 3: old and he had some parents who had issues with that.
Speaker 3: Now they're teaching them all kinds of Jeffrey Epstein's sex
Speaker 3: at eight years old. And the second then thirdly, it
Speaker 3: will invade everybody's privacy. Well, that's exactly the point, isn't it.
Speaker 3: And that it will chill and compel speech, Well, that
Speaker 3: is also the point. And we have seen this over
Speaker 3: and over again. As a matter of fact, you got
Speaker 3: people like John Kerry at the World Economic Forum saying
Speaker 3: we have got to control speech.
Speaker 2: We can't have free speech out there.
Speaker 12: And I think the dislike of and anguish over social
Speaker 12: media is just growing and growing and growing, and it's
Speaker 12: part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of
Speaker 12: building consensus around any issue. It's really hard to govern today.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have to govern by manufacturing consent freeze.
Speaker 12: We used to have to determine what's a fact and
Speaker 12: what is in fact. The kind of been eviscerated to
Speaker 12: a certain degree.
Speaker 2: And we need to be the authorities and.
Speaker 12: That people self select where they go for their news
Speaker 12: or for their information.
Speaker 2: It's called freedom into a vicious cycle.
Speaker 12: So it's really really hard, much harder to build consensus
Speaker 12: today than at any time in the forty five fifty
Speaker 12: years I've been involved in this. And you know, there's
Speaker 12: a lot of discussion now about how you curb those
Speaker 12: entities in order to guarantee that you're going to have,
Speaker 12: you know, some accountability on facts, et cetera. But look,
Speaker 12: if people go to only one source and the source
Speaker 12: they go to is sick and you know, has an
Speaker 12: agenda and they're put out disinformation.
Speaker 2: Well, Sean Kerry doesn't have that's a.
Speaker 12: Major block to the ability to be able to just
Speaker 12: you know, hammer it out of existence.
Speaker 2: So what you need, what we need.
Speaker 12: Is to win the ground, win the right to govern
Speaker 12: by hopefully having you know, winning enough votes that you're
Speaker 12: free to be able to implement change.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 12: You know, obviously there are some people in our country
Speaker 12: who are prepared to implement.
Speaker 2: Change in other ways, and that's.
Speaker 3: Where we're really democracy can survive on writing.
Speaker 12: I think democracies are very challenged right now and have
Speaker 12: not proven they can move fast enough or big enough
Speaker 12: to deal with the challenges that we are facing. And
Speaker 12: to me, that is part of what this race, this
Speaker 12: this election is all about. Will we break the fever
Speaker 12: in the United States?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Well, the World Economic Form is just adamant that we
Speaker 3: have got to control speech. They talk about it constantly.
Speaker 3: You cannot be allowed to have different sources of information
Speaker 3: and to try to sort through those things that will
Speaker 3: not be allowed. It's not just John Kerry. This is
Speaker 3: a constant hammering from these people, and of course we
Speaker 3: also see it coming from the Zionists. Whenever you see
Speaker 3: people who cannot handle debate and the competition of ideas
Speaker 3: in the marketplace, you can bet it's because they've got
Speaker 3: a bad hand. You can bet it's because they can't
Speaker 3: convince people to do what they want them to do,
Speaker 3: because they're wrong.
Speaker 15: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet Laos, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 15: Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
Speaker 15: Global Business Commune. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 15: years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and
Speaker 15: misinformation for not closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is a revolutionary act. And they don't want
Speaker 3: people revolting and realize we are always in a libertarian party.
Speaker 3: The government is revolting, why aren't you. They're revolting as
Speaker 3: in disgusting, They're revolting as in revolting against the rule
Speaker 3: of law. And so the question is, I want we're
Speaker 3: going to put up with this kind of stuff. But
Speaker 3: that's what they want. They want to be able to
Speaker 3: manufacture consent. They want to be able to control information.
Speaker 3: And quite frankly, folks, that's why the First Amendment is
Speaker 3: the First Amendment to protect free speech, the free exercise religion.
Speaker 3: It's about protecting free thought as well, free agency and
Speaker 3: true freedom. So then we have the Clarity Act, and
Speaker 3: this is about the fight between banks and the stable
Speaker 3: coin people as to whether or not only banks will
Speaker 3: be able to pay you interest, except they don't pay
Speaker 3: you interest, do they Just the theory it's become a
Speaker 3: joke I'm looking at this and thinking, why are they
Speaker 3: having this big fight? I mean, we look at what
Speaker 3: the banks typically pay is typically a fraction of one percent.
Speaker 3: While they're charging you twenty thirty, forty fifty percent on
Speaker 3: credit cards and other things, they're charging you ten percent.
Speaker 3: I mean, they're paying absolutely nothing on savings accounts. So
Speaker 3: why is this big deal? Well, the banks are trying
Speaker 3: are grasping at anything they can because they know that
Speaker 3: the stable coin people are gunning for them. Yet Eric
Speaker 3: Trump pointed that out. He said, well, in ten years,
Speaker 3: is not going to be any banks. And of course
Speaker 3: that don't mean that there's not going to be any
Speaker 3: way for you to process cash. Really, it's going to
Speaker 3: be very difficult to do that. And so I'm not
Speaker 3: a fan of this kind of stuff. But you have
Speaker 3: the Coinbase chief legal officer who's out there cheerleading for this.
Speaker 3: He says, all right, now we're getting a regulatory framework
Speaker 3: for how we can operate so we can push forward
Speaker 3: with all this crypto stuff as well as the stable coins.
Speaker 2: So they want.
Speaker 3: Regulatory clarity, so they call the Clarity Act. Now, let's
Speaker 3: make it clear that only the big guys like Coinbase
Speaker 3: are going to be able to participate in this new economy.
Speaker 3: It's time to get clarity done, he said. The final
Speaker 3: text aimed at settling the stable coin yield dispute between
Speaker 3: banking and crypto industries. In the end, the banks were
Speaker 3: able to get more restrictions on rewards, so that's what
Speaker 3: they'll do. They'll call it rewards rather than interest.
Speaker 5: And Coinbase has already proven that they are more than
Speaker 5: willing to play ball and censor.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, those in power.
Speaker 5: There are certain people that they will just if you
Speaker 5: send money to them, they'll just cut you off. There's
Speaker 5: a guy that runs a website called the Kiwi Farms
Speaker 5: and it's basically just a gossip for them. But certain
Speaker 5: powerful people at Google don't like it because it's basically
Speaker 5: the only place you can get a record of their
Speaker 5: misdeeds and you know, had them basically deplatformed. The guy
Speaker 5: has had. He moved to Eastern Europe for a while
Speaker 5: to get away from the nonsense.
Speaker 3: And as people talking about hijacking and bitcoin and crypto
Speaker 3: and coinbase played a big role in that they would
Speaker 3: be the ones that would decide. Just along the lines
Speaker 3: of what Jeffrey Epstein was working on, some of the
Speaker 3: emails that we saw there. You know, we need to
Speaker 3: have somebody who's going to pick which coins are going
Speaker 3: to be promoted, which coins are going to be cleared
Speaker 3: and allowed to be used. And coinbase is one of
Speaker 3: the key gatekeepers for all of that. They can determine
Speaker 3: which coins are going to be out there and which
Speaker 3: ones are not. So again we look at this constellation
Speaker 3: of acts that are being put through, these laws that
Speaker 3: are being passed by Congress, and it's all about crypto
Speaker 3: and AI and all these disruptive technologies. They want to
Speaker 3: disrupt everything, set themselves up, so we're going to destroy
Speaker 3: the banking industry. So now you got to use our
Speaker 3: crypto stuff. And oh, by the way, if you want
Speaker 3: to use the crypto stuff, now we're going to have
Speaker 3: all of your information, your ID, all the rest of
Speaker 3: this stuff, biometrics, you name it. So the text is
Speaker 3: of this thing is titled in section four four Prohibiting
Speaker 3: Interest and Yield on payment stable Coins. It says that
Speaker 3: no crypto firm may pay any form of interest or
Speaker 3: yield to customers solely for holding stable coins, again to
Speaker 3: a bank deposit or any other interest bearing products. So
Speaker 3: again they will play the game of calling it a reward,
Speaker 3: and you can't really stop this thing. It is a
Speaker 3: juggernaut that is out there, and they're going to use
Speaker 3: this to further the police surveillance state. The clarity of
Speaker 3: not getting risk free yield on your dollars without using
Speaker 3: a bank, they said, And yet the reality is the
Speaker 3: banks don't pay any interest to people to start with.
Speaker 3: So it's all a maguffin to a large degree as
Speaker 3: far as that is concerned, isn't it. Well, we're going
Speaker 3: to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be back.
Speaker 3: But actually got a comment here.
Speaker 5: I think that's right, we do. DG eight, thank you
Speaker 5: very much, says there's neither Jew nor Greek. There's neither
Speaker 5: male nor female for your all one in Christ Jesus,
Speaker 5: and if you be Christ, then are Abraham Seed and
Speaker 5: heirs according to the promise.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Christ made that clear, and Paul spent a lot
Speaker 3: of time in letters to Galatians and other people to
Speaker 3: make that clear. And he was very concerned about the
Speaker 3: Judaizers of his day, and I'm very concerned about the
Speaker 3: schofield Bible judaizers of our day, and has had horrific
Speaker 3: fruit both spiritual as well as a temporal. What we
Speaker 3: look at in terms of this idea that there is
Speaker 3: that God's chosen people are determined by genealogy, which they
Speaker 3: by the way, they run from that as well. They
Speaker 3: really don't want to do the genealogical test because they're
Speaker 3: afraid of what they might find.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back, Jordan.
Speaker 1: Listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: If you like the Eagles on.
Speaker 14: The Cars and Healey Lewis and the news, they say
Speaker 14: you'll love the classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
Speaker 14: our app or listen now at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 8: Listen up, losers, stop pretending it's a democracy.
Speaker 2: We run things.
Speaker 8: Give up the illusion, and in exchange we will bring
Speaker 8: you order and efficiency. Yes, we'll own you, But do
Speaker 8: you really want to be free?
Speaker 9: Trust us?
Speaker 5: We know what to do.
Speaker 8: While Silicon Valley was feeding you dope and free email,
Speaker 8: we built the architecture of empire.
Speaker 5: Welcome to our world.
Speaker 8: We aren't here to protect your privacy. We are here
Speaker 8: to enforce supremacy.
Speaker 2: We are the Ledger.
Speaker 8: Now every tax return, every Medicaid file, every license plate,
Speaker 8: every crossing. Your presidents signed it into being with a
Speaker 8: pen in march. You kept scrolling. Your politicians are empty vessels,
Speaker 8: Your civil liberties are a liability. We are done pretending
Speaker 8: all cultures are equal. We know who the elites are,
Speaker 8: we know what we are building, and we demand that
Speaker 8: you applaud the billionaires taking the reins where your fragile
Speaker 8: democracies have failed. Welcome to the technological Republic. You can
Speaker 8: stop scrolling now. We already have everything we need. Try
Speaker 8: to unplug us, We dare you. Now get the gap?
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, try to unplug us, We dare you.
Speaker 3: And that's only what they're doing. You know, they're putting
Speaker 3: all this stuff in here, this disruptive technology. It's like, yeah,
Speaker 3: try to unplug us. And if you use us, it
Speaker 3: comes with these blocks and chains. Yeah we are the
Speaker 3: ledger you heard him say. And of course the block
Speaker 3: you know, they're going to block what you do. They're
Speaker 3: going to chain your freedom. That's what they're going to
Speaker 3: do with the block chain. Regardless of what this was
Speaker 3: originally intended to do. We can have that debate whether
Speaker 3: this was the design from the very beginning or whether
Speaker 3: this is a scuttling of it. But the bottom line is,
Speaker 3: this is where it is going and when you look
Speaker 3: at all these different things, you know, Marshall Blackburn is
Speaker 3: at the epicenter of all of this stuff. You know,
Speaker 3: her Genesis Act is part of the Genius Act as well.
Speaker 3: She wants to pull this this Guard Act as part
Speaker 3: of it and all of it, and the Trump AI Act.
Speaker 3: And the fact that they're acting is if we don't
Speaker 3: have a tenth Amendment. They're saying they're they're taking over
Speaker 3: the authority of the states to be able to regulate
Speaker 3: this stuff or to they don't even you know, we're
Speaker 3: not going to let you put any chains on AI.
Speaker 3: We'll put the chains on the people instead. Well, maybe
Speaker 3: the way they're able to pull this off is through
Speaker 3: the fluoride lowering IQ points, making people more passive. We
Speaker 3: now have a new fluoride study that is being pushed
Speaker 3: by the mainstream media. They're really excited about this new
Speaker 3: study because they got a study to say that basically,
Speaker 3: there is no effect on IQ. This is totally detached
Speaker 3: from reality. And as we've said before, they can rig
Speaker 3: studies to show whatever they want. We've seen this on
Speaker 3: pharmaceutical industry over and over again. You have three different companies,
Speaker 3: Brand A, B, and C. And they'll all three of
Speaker 3: them will come up with a new drug for some condition,
Speaker 3: and they will fund their own studies. And guess what
Speaker 3: the studies will show. The study that was funded by
Speaker 3: Brand A will say that it's better than the other two.
Speaker 3: The one that was done by Brand B will say
Speaker 3: that it's better than the other two. The one done
Speaker 3: by Brand C will say it's better than the other two.
Speaker 3: They get what they fund here. Well, Children's Health Defense
Speaker 3: has broken down the flaws of this study. The highly
Speaker 3: anticipated long term study that was published April the thirteenth
Speaker 3: and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science was
Speaker 3: widely cited by media and proponents of water fluoridation as
Speaker 3: evidence that there is no difference in IQ between people
Speaker 3: who drink water containing fluoride at the levels currently recommended
Speaker 3: by the US public health agencies and the people who
Speaker 3: did not drink fluoride at the levels that are recommended
Speaker 3: by the US public health agencies.
Speaker 2: I remember.
Speaker 3: You had people who are working on this, the Free
Speaker 3: Thought Project, Derek Browse. I talked to him about this.
Speaker 3: They worked very hard. They were able to get a
Speaker 3: friendly court ruling against the mandatory poisoning of water with fluoride,
Speaker 3: and the Trump administration now is appealing this and fighting it.
Speaker 3: And so the question is I've always said, let's just
Speaker 3: assume for a moment that fluoride is safe and effective.
Speaker 3: It's neither safe nor effective. Well, let's just assume that
Speaker 3: it is. Then why would you put that in the
Speaker 3: water supply. You can't have something that is safe if
Speaker 3: you don't control the dosage. You can't have something that
Speaker 3: is effective if you don't control the dosage. You can't
Speaker 3: control the dosage if you put it in the water supply.
Speaker 3: And if you put it in the water supply, you're
Speaker 3: going to get the same dosage for a child that
Speaker 3: you get for an adult. If you look at every
Speaker 3: single medicine that is out there, they have different dosages
Speaker 3: for children than they do for adults. Why would you
Speaker 3: ever try to medicate people through the water supply. It
Speaker 3: makes absolutely no sense. Well, guess what that is the
Speaker 3: very first flaw in this study. They found that the
Speaker 3: authors didn't actually measure how much fluoride the study participants consumed. Well,
Speaker 3: how would you do that if it's in the water supply.
Speaker 3: That's the key point. I keep coming back to it.
Speaker 3: Totally illogical. Regardless of what they say about safety or efficacy,
Speaker 3: it's all dose dependent. Safety is dose dependent, Efficacy is
Speaker 3: dose dependent. They also didn't study people who were exposed
Speaker 3: to fluoride as neonates or to young children. And this
Speaker 3: is where the damage is really done. It's done to
Speaker 3: developing children as well as to young children. That's when
Speaker 3: the brain damage occurs. And we've seen that over and
Speaker 3: over again, and so study participants and they had in
Speaker 3: the past, they had studies that were done in China
Speaker 3: and other places where they could see large drops in
Speaker 3: IQ if they got over a certain level. And so
Speaker 3: what they said in the United States, well, we don't
Speaker 3: have it over that. We recommend that you get right
Speaker 3: up to that level, but not over that level. It's like, well,
Speaker 3: how do you control that if you're putting it in
Speaker 3: the water supply.
Speaker 2: You can't.
Speaker 3: You can't be sure that you're not giving them too much.
Speaker 3: Study participants were people that were born in nineteen thirty nine,
Speaker 3: six years before the community water flooridation began anywhere in
Speaker 3: the United States, so it didn't start until nineteen forty
Speaker 3: five World War Two, and a large part of the
Speaker 3: reason that it began was because you had some industries.
Speaker 3: A couple of them you had after nineteen forty five.
Speaker 3: You had the the nuclear industry as well as the
Speaker 3: aluminum industry. They both wanted to get rid of fluoride
Speaker 3: polluted products that they had, and rather than go through
Speaker 3: an expensive process of getting rid of these contaminants and everything,
Speaker 3: they just basically started charging. They got the government to say, well,
Speaker 3: we're going to put it in the water, and they
Speaker 3: didn't have to pay to get rid of this toxic stuff.
Speaker 3: They got local communities to pay them to put it
Speaker 3: in their drinking water. Brilliant right. Well, study participants in
Speaker 3: this were born before any mass floridation began, and so
Speaker 3: they would not have been exposed to this as developing
Speaker 3: children or as young children. No one in the study
Speaker 3: was exposed to it during the critical developmental years when
Speaker 3: it can affect IQ, and few people were exposed to
Speaker 3: floridated water at all and that particular time frame. So
Speaker 3: this is the way that they gain the system. And
Speaker 3: as we look at where we're going with this, you've
Speaker 3: got Thomas Massey pushing really hard against not just the
Speaker 3: fluoride stuff is out there being pushed on, but also
Speaker 3: glafyset and the Trump administration wants to give them the
Speaker 3: kind protections that Faucci gave the vaccine industry back in
Speaker 3: nineteen eighty six. Thomas Massey had this to.
Speaker 16: Say, Americans are under attacked by a Germany company on
Speaker 16: four fronts. Legislative at the federal level, legislative at the
Speaker 16: state level, through.
Speaker 9: The executive branch, and finally the courts.
Speaker 16: And unfortunately this administration has sided with the German company.
Speaker 16: We're trying to get immunity from the harm that their
Speaker 16: products may cause stuff and to do that, they're trying
Speaker 16: to say that nobody can bring this company for their
Speaker 16: product life sate and have their day in court.
Speaker 17: What is Congress doing right now? I know that you
Speaker 17: propose a bill.
Speaker 18: So Shelley PingER and I, in response to all these
Speaker 18: attacks on the legislative, executive, and judicial branch, we introduced
Speaker 18: a bill called no Immunity for Glyphasate. But this week
Speaker 18: they're going to pass a farm bill, and we're trying
Speaker 18: to get them to strip the immunity for glyphasate that
Speaker 18: they've put.
Speaker 9: Into that farm bill.
Speaker 18: The Farm bill is an important bill, it's going to pass.
Speaker 18: That's why they attach this to it. We were successful
Speaker 18: in getting this immunity shield stripped from prior funding bills.
Speaker 18: But right now this is stuck in the Farm bill,
Speaker 18: a bill that I'm inclined to vote for, but we've
Speaker 18: got to try and get the a glyphasate immunity out
Speaker 18: of it.
Speaker 17: Why do you think that this is happening? Why are
Speaker 17: they trying to pass this? Who's behind this?
Speaker 9: The corporations? I mean it's a foreign corporation.
Speaker 18: Bear They their product has become unprofitable because of the
Speaker 18: harm that state jurys have decided has been caused to people.
Speaker 18: And you know there's something broader though than just glyphisate here.
Speaker 18: It would this would set a precedent for every pesticide,
Speaker 18: every herbicide, every insecticide, And it would set a precedent
Speaker 18: that the EPA doesn't exist to protect people in the environment,
Speaker 18: that it exists to give get out.
Speaker 9: Of court free cards to corporations.
Speaker 17: And did you listen to some of the victims today
Speaker 17: of Monsanto? What are your thoughts and what words of
Speaker 17: wisdom would you extend to people who have lost loved
Speaker 17: ones because of glyfa sate.
Speaker 9: You know I'm getting deja vu here.
Speaker 18: I stood very near here and did a similar press
Speaker 18: conference with the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and we had
Speaker 18: one in a million chants of getting that bill passed
Speaker 18: through both chambers and signed by the President. And in
Speaker 18: fact we got it done because people did stand in
Speaker 18: front of microphones in front of Washington, d C. And
Speaker 18: descended on Washington, d C and god on social media
Speaker 18: and told their representatives, by golly, you better get justice
Speaker 18: for these victims. And so I think we could get
Speaker 18: justice for the still home for everybody else.
Speaker 17: What do you expect in the Supreme Court? Do you
Speaker 17: think the conservative justices will go in the favor of
Speaker 17: what you're looking for or not? And the liberal justices.
Speaker 17: I think it's going to be really interesting.
Speaker 18: You know, I'm going to be interested to see if
Speaker 18: they decide this with out looking at the evidence of
Speaker 18: the scientific evidence of whether the product causes harm. They
Speaker 18: could decide this as a matter of law and ignore
Speaker 18: whether people were actually harmed or not.
Speaker 9: I think it would be dangerous to do that.
Speaker 17: And any last thoughts on gl monsanto and why people
Speaker 17: should be aware and what they could do to.
Speaker 18: Help, well, it's really you know, we're not saying take
Speaker 18: it off the market.
Speaker 9: I'm a farmer.
Speaker 18: You know, I've used chemical products as well. But question
Speaker 18: here is what should be on the label. What they're
Speaker 18: also trying to do here is to say that the
Speaker 18: states cannot put their own warnings on products that they
Speaker 18: deem could be dangerous if used in certain ways. So
Speaker 18: we're not talking about banning. This is not a hearing
Speaker 18: on whether to ban life is state. This is a
Speaker 18: hearing on whether the states can take up for their
Speaker 18: people in their courtrooms by holding juries by trials with juries,
Speaker 18: and whether they can add additional labels warning labels to
Speaker 18: the products, or whether once the EPA speaks that nobody
Speaker 18: else can say anything else about the product.
Speaker 17: So people call their congress people and tell them that
Speaker 17: they don't want life a seat, or that they would
Speaker 17: actually to support your bill.
Speaker 18: People this week should be calling their congressmen and their
Speaker 18: senators in saying, take the glafystate immunity out of the
Speaker 18: farm bill. If nothing else, allow Shelley Pingre and Thomas
Speaker 18: Massey to have a vote on their amendment so that
Speaker 18: everybody can go on record as to whether they support
Speaker 18: immunity for a German company or not a German company.
Speaker 3: Then well, and again it's about the corporations, and one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why when you look at this big
Speaker 3: AG is no different than big pharma. They don't care
Speaker 3: what they put into your body, whether it's food or drugs,
Speaker 3: whether it's good or harmful, as long as.
Speaker 2: They make money.
Speaker 3: And when you look at the Trump administration and the
Speaker 3: current mood in Washington, they don't care whether it is
Speaker 3: something that is poisoning your body or poisoning your mind.
Speaker 3: They're going to protect AI as well as glyphys from
Speaker 3: any state regulations that would try to protect people.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
Speaker 3: The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 3: our children. They created common past, track and control us
Speaker 3: their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 3: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 3: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 3: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 3: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 3: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 3: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 3: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 3: information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 3: Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 3: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 3: D Davidnightshow dot com