WEBVTT

1
00:00:07.679 --> 00:00:09.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Redefining Energy.

2
00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Your co hosts.

3
00:00:11.960 --> 00:00:13.679
<v Speaker 3>From Berlin Gerard Reed.

4
00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And from London Laurent Today on Redefining Energy, we're going

5
00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk about fossil fuels and whether we're going to

6
00:00:22.399 --> 00:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>actually see peak demand in the next few years or not.

7
00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:29.399
<v Speaker 3>And of course there are furious debates around experts whether

8
00:00:29.760 --> 00:00:33.359
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see the consumption stay around one hundred

9
00:00:33.439 --> 00:00:35.799
<v Speaker 3>million barier level per day or if we're going to.

10
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Go down exactly. So we decided we bring in an

11
00:00:39.719 --> 00:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>expert someone Listen, I've known a long while. It was

12
00:00:43.439 --> 00:00:46.039
<v Speaker 1>like myself. Comes in the equity research background, and what's

13
00:00:46.039 --> 00:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>his name?

14
00:00:50.960 --> 00:00:53.920
<v Speaker 3>His name is Bond, King's Mill Bond.

15
00:01:04.159 --> 00:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely got the coolest name in the industry, doesn't it.

16
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, not only has a great name, but he works

17
00:01:12.359 --> 00:01:16.680
<v Speaker 3>at RMI and he publishes exceptional research on the future

18
00:01:16.719 --> 00:01:17.359
<v Speaker 3>of energy.

19
00:01:17.879 --> 00:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's bring him on the show. King's Milk, Welcome

20
00:01:20.599 --> 00:01:21.079
<v Speaker 1>to the show.

21
00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me. Folks.

22
00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm going to jump right in. Last month's ex

23
00:01:26.239 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 3>and Mobile release a report saying that basically we're going

24
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:32.519
<v Speaker 3>to continue burning one hundred million buried of oil for

25
00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:35.959
<v Speaker 3>the foreseeable future, which, of course Appeck found it very

26
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:39.239
<v Speaker 3>interesting report. But we brought you because you have a

27
00:01:39.239 --> 00:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>bit of a contrarian view on the subject.

28
00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's especially contrarian to say that incumbents

29
00:01:45.680 --> 00:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>taught their own book, and incumbents expect a future in

30
00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:53.159
<v Speaker 2>which they remain extremely profitable. Think about the famous debate

31
00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>about horses and tractors in the nineteen twenty see Horse

32
00:01:56.879 --> 00:02:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Association of America regularly put out report telling us that

33
00:02:01.079 --> 00:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>forces were the future and the tractors didn't work. It's

34
00:02:04.439 --> 00:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the same thing here with excell It's not surprising that

35
00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:10.199
<v Speaker 2>exot is telling us that in twenty fifty we'll still

36
00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:12.879
<v Speaker 2>be using a lot of oil. But you have to

37
00:02:13.039 --> 00:02:16.919
<v Speaker 2>believe in a lot of very profoundly improbable things if

38
00:02:16.919 --> 00:02:20.159
<v Speaker 2>you want to believe their forecosts. Give us the contrarian view,

39
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:23.039
<v Speaker 2>then it's not contrarian at all. I think it's merely

40
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a realist view and a reflection of what is happening

41
00:02:27.159 --> 00:02:29.759
<v Speaker 2>in the real world, rather than the kind of make

42
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>believe world of spreadsheets in which fossil fuel incumbents inhabit.

43
00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>And reality similarly is that you have exponential growth of

44
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>clean energy technologies which are now large enough to disrupt

45
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the current fossil fuel system, and they will push fossil

46
00:02:46.280 --> 00:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>fuel demand into permanent decline by the end of this decade.

47
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a big statement. Tell us where does that start

48
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and how do we when do we know we've really

49
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>reached that tipping pointer, because that tipping point is a

50
00:02:57.439 --> 00:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>game changer for the oil industry and also I think

51
00:03:00.199 --> 00:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>clean energy in general.

52
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>It's very important to focus on the facts of the

53
00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>case and just to look at the information, the data

54
00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that's coming out. Year after year, we're seeing the exponential

55
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>growth of these clean energy technologies of solar and wind

56
00:03:14.719 --> 00:03:17.639
<v Speaker 2>and batteries and of course all of the paraphernalia surrounding

57
00:03:17.719 --> 00:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>that system. And then equally, year after year we're seeing

58
00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:25.439
<v Speaker 2>peaking demand for one aspect after another of the current

59
00:03:25.479 --> 00:03:28.199
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel system. So just to give you a couple

60
00:03:28.240 --> 00:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>of examples, So, fossil fuel demand peat in the OECD

61
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>almost a generation ago in two thousand and seven. Fossil

62
00:03:35.159 --> 00:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>fuel demand peat in the industrial sector a decade ago

63
00:03:39.319 --> 00:03:42.479
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen, as the result of the electrication of

64
00:03:42.599 --> 00:03:48.039
<v Speaker 2>Chinese industrial sector. Ice car demand peaked in twenty and eighteen.

65
00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:50.319
<v Speaker 2>I could go on for a long time, but you're

66
00:03:50.360 --> 00:03:54.919
<v Speaker 2>just seeing one absolutely indisputable peak after the next in

67
00:03:54.960 --> 00:03:57.479
<v Speaker 2>the old system as the new stuff comes in. And

68
00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:00.319
<v Speaker 2>that's precisely what you would expect in any.

69
00:04:01.039 --> 00:04:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Can I be contrarian to the contrarian square contrarian if

70
00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I look at the world globally and I'm totally with

71
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>you on the OECD, only this year will the addition

72
00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of wind and solar be one hundred percent of the

73
00:04:17.240 --> 00:04:21.319
<v Speaker 3>growth of electricity. Why it's because let's name it the

74
00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>global sauce India groing. It's called demand that's for electricity.

75
00:04:26.839 --> 00:04:30.759
<v Speaker 3>And the second thing is, although the EV market is

76
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>going we're going to do seventeen million evs, so the

77
00:04:34.639 --> 00:04:37.600
<v Speaker 3>time it's going to take to move the transportation sector

78
00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to electric while at the same time jet fuel is

79
00:04:40.959 --> 00:04:43.759
<v Speaker 3>going up and chemicals is going up. So are you

80
00:04:43.879 --> 00:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>really confident that we're going to see a significant decline

81
00:04:46.720 --> 00:04:48.439
<v Speaker 3>because I'm still on the fence here.

82
00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:52.399
<v Speaker 2>So, Laura, you're putting together a lot of different issues

83
00:04:52.439 --> 00:04:54.800
<v Speaker 2>here and hard to address them all in a single comment.

84
00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>But let's stop with electricity. Electricity system, there are full

85
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:02.839
<v Speaker 2>basic pieces when it comes to countries inside electricity demand.

86
00:05:03.120 --> 00:05:06.319
<v Speaker 2>So you've got the OECD, you've got China, you've got

87
00:05:06.319 --> 00:05:09.079
<v Speaker 2>the Global self, and you've got the Better States. Those

88
00:05:09.079 --> 00:05:12.160
<v Speaker 2>are your four pieces inside the system. And we have

89
00:05:12.199 --> 00:05:14.879
<v Speaker 2>this SECDP about fifteen years ago, I should say, we

90
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>have the China peak in twenty twenty three. Those two

91
00:05:18.199 --> 00:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>regions alone around sixty percent of the total, so we

92
00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>already crossed, as it were, the tipping point. You then

93
00:05:25.720 --> 00:05:27.519
<v Speaker 2>have the global self, or actually one third of the

94
00:05:27.519 --> 00:05:30.759
<v Speaker 2>global self has also seen peak electricity demand. It's right

95
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>across Latin America and in various other countries. So you're

96
00:05:34.879 --> 00:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of left with two or one and a half

97
00:05:37.160 --> 00:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>pieces petro states, which is about five percent of the

98
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:43.079
<v Speaker 2>global population, and the rest of the global self, where

99
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:45.720
<v Speaker 2>in fact there's also growth taking place quite quickly. The

100
00:05:45.720 --> 00:05:47.959
<v Speaker 2>one I guess is that the decline in the two

101
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:51.399
<v Speaker 2>biggest pieces of the system OECD in China will outweigh

102
00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the relatively small amount of growth in the remaining growing

103
00:05:54.720 --> 00:05:58.519
<v Speaker 2>parts of the system, and that again is absolutely normal.

104
00:05:58.519 --> 00:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>You'd see that in many other transition. Then when it

105
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>comes to your second point, for about the electric vehicle

106
00:06:04.199 --> 00:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>story once more, here you've got to look at what's

107
00:06:06.680 --> 00:06:09.319
<v Speaker 2>happening in the world's largest market, which of course is China.

108
00:06:09.439 --> 00:06:12.399
<v Speaker 2>As everyone knows, electric vehicles are now fifty percent of

109
00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>total sales in China, and if we continue to extrapolate

110
00:06:16.720 --> 00:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the S curve, then we're going to be basically near

111
00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent by the end of this decade. And

112
00:06:21.399 --> 00:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>from China, the low costs and that technology then spreads

113
00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:27.879
<v Speaker 2>across the global self, and that means you can of

114
00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>course have what Hues called reverse sedience, that is to say,

115
00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>certain specific countries which hold back against change, but it's

116
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:36.399
<v Speaker 2>not going to slow aback the global tig King.

117
00:06:36.519 --> 00:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Can I ask you about I can sort of get

118
00:06:38.160 --> 00:06:40.639
<v Speaker 4>my head around peak oil demand. I can ask get

119
00:06:40.639 --> 00:06:44.399
<v Speaker 4>my head around peak coal demand. Where I sort of

120
00:06:44.439 --> 00:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>can't get my head around is natural gas. Can you

121
00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:49.399
<v Speaker 4>give your sort of thoughts on that and how you

122
00:06:49.439 --> 00:06:50.959
<v Speaker 4>see demand for that going forward?

123
00:06:52.079 --> 00:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Gas?

124
00:06:52.639 --> 00:06:54.279
<v Speaker 2>The first point to be made, of course here is

125
00:06:54.279 --> 00:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that all prices are linked, and therefore, as you have

126
00:06:59.399 --> 00:07:04.680
<v Speaker 2>this new enormous, cheap energy source of renewables coming into

127
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the energy system, it will impact the entire system in

128
00:07:09.079 --> 00:07:12.120
<v Speaker 2>ways that we can't necessarily forecast in detail. In twenty

129
00:07:12.199 --> 00:07:15.079
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. But one has to realize that very simple economics,

130
00:07:15.079 --> 00:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>when a cheap, giant new energy source comes into a

131
00:07:17.800 --> 00:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>massive system, everything gets impacted. So then when it comes

132
00:07:20.759 --> 00:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to gas, the first bottombout gas is that, as you know,

133
00:07:23.279 --> 00:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>basically half of gas is used for electricity generation. In

134
00:07:27.839 --> 00:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the electricity generation space, the requirement for the gas fulfills

135
00:07:31.920 --> 00:07:36.439
<v Speaker 2>for intermittency is relatively small. The requirement for baseload, however,

136
00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to be continuously eroded away by superior, cheaper

137
00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>renewable energy technologies. And this again brings me to something

138
00:07:43.639 --> 00:07:47.279
<v Speaker 2>which is really significant in the debate. We are not

139
00:07:47.639 --> 00:07:50.439
<v Speaker 2>arguing about the date of the endgame, or when the

140
00:07:50.519 --> 00:07:52.959
<v Speaker 2>endgame happens, or how do you solve the last twenty

141
00:07:53.079 --> 00:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>or even thirty forty percent. We're arguing about a peak

142
00:07:56.839 --> 00:07:59.959
<v Speaker 2>and a decline in a system which is eighty percent

143
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>a primary energy production. That's much easier to podcast as

144
00:08:04.439 --> 00:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>much easier to see that this is happening will happen.

145
00:08:08.319 --> 00:08:11.279
<v Speaker 3>I love what I hear, but also I can see

146
00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:14.800
<v Speaker 3>stuff like in the US or in Canada, gas is

147
00:08:14.839 --> 00:08:18.519
<v Speaker 3>a two dollars pum and btu which creates a fuel

148
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:22.839
<v Speaker 3>costs omega. What hour a ten dollars, okay, I multiply

149
00:08:22.959 --> 00:08:25.319
<v Speaker 3>by three point four, and then I put the energy

150
00:08:25.319 --> 00:08:28.959
<v Speaker 3>efficiency of the turbine, so ten dollars promega what our

151
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:31.879
<v Speaker 3>plus is dispatchable. It's going to take a bit of

152
00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>time for solar plus batteries or even when to reach

153
00:08:35.480 --> 00:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>that level. Just to illustrate that the data centers are

154
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:42.279
<v Speaker 3>really power hungry. They took the big talk about their emission.

155
00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I think they cook their books, but in reality they

156
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:48.240
<v Speaker 3>just want power wherever it comes from. So on the

157
00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>gas story, as long as it's that chip, it's a

158
00:08:51.120 --> 00:08:53.559
<v Speaker 3>tough one to be now, of course, when you're importing

159
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>it from Russia and cost of fortune, I understand. But

160
00:08:56.279 --> 00:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>there are places where they're just going to continue to

161
00:08:58.600 --> 00:08:59.919
<v Speaker 3>use gas as much as they can.

162
00:09:00.679 --> 00:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>There is no dispute that in the very low cost

163
00:09:04.559 --> 00:09:07.559
<v Speaker 2>locations of gas in the United States, or oil in

164
00:09:07.559 --> 00:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia or coal in eastern Russia, people will carry

165
00:09:11.679 --> 00:09:14.039
<v Speaker 2>on doing this stuff. There is no dispute about that.

166
00:09:14.519 --> 00:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Good luck to them, and they'll carry on doing it

167
00:09:16.120 --> 00:09:19.519
<v Speaker 2>for decades to come. But the marginal change is not

168
00:09:19.639 --> 00:09:23.639
<v Speaker 2>happening in those locations. All of the global growth now

169
00:09:23.799 --> 00:09:28.039
<v Speaker 2>in primary energy demant is taking place in the Global South,

170
00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>and in those countries, they're not channing and out handering

171
00:09:31.720 --> 00:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>out prices of two bucks. They're buying an energy at

172
00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>ten and if you're infer multiple is five. In fact,

173
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:40.279
<v Speaker 2>I suspect the real multiple actually is eight. With a

174
00:09:40.360 --> 00:09:43.159
<v Speaker 2>level of efficiency in those markets, ten bucks is eighty

175
00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:45.759
<v Speaker 2>dollars per mega. What hour you can churn out soda

176
00:09:45.799 --> 00:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>at forty You could put a battery on that and

177
00:09:48.000 --> 00:09:50.279
<v Speaker 2>account for the intermittency, and it's going to be sixty.

178
00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:54.919
<v Speaker 2>This debate is completely over. Ninety percent of all new

179
00:09:55.080 --> 00:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>electricity capex globally, in eighty percent in the Global South

180
00:09:58.600 --> 00:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>is now renewables. There's a few little pockets of resistance

181
00:10:03.200 --> 00:10:05.559
<v Speaker 2>still to be cleared up, but that's completely irrelevant to

182
00:10:05.600 --> 00:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the global story. I mean, sorry, I know you don't

183
00:10:07.480 --> 00:10:10.399
<v Speaker 2>necessarily disagree with this at all, but it's also really

184
00:10:10.399 --> 00:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>important to say that the existence of continuity of fossil

185
00:10:14.039 --> 00:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>fuels in various parts of the system doesn't matter. It's

186
00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>all about what's happening at the margin, and what's happening

187
00:10:19.720 --> 00:10:22.279
<v Speaker 2>to growth in the growth markets, and what's happening to

188
00:10:22.399 --> 00:10:24.399
<v Speaker 2>price at the margin, which counts.

189
00:10:24.840 --> 00:10:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Kingswell, I just want to follow up there on the

190
00:10:26.399 --> 00:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Global South. My own view is that these countries can

191
00:10:29.440 --> 00:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really take a big leap ahead of us because we've

192
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>got an old system and I don't mean just a

193
00:10:35.720 --> 00:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>father fuels. Actually it is a fossil fuel based system.

194
00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Even the electricity system is fossil fuel based. It's been

195
00:10:40.720 --> 00:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>around for one hundred and twenty years. They can embrace

196
00:10:43.399 --> 00:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>electrification and renewabilization and by doing that they can make

197
00:10:47.080 --> 00:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge leap.

198
00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>For that is indutedly true. So basically two narratives of

199
00:10:52.399 --> 00:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the Global South. The first narrative is that the Global

200
00:10:55.879 --> 00:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Self is a useful way to prop up the dyeing

201
00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel system decline in the wears, but growth in

202
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the global selth thin good is for that everything is fine,

203
00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's one narrative that the fossil fuel folks are pushing.

204
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:11.679
<v Speaker 2>The reality is that the Global Self will ride the

205
00:11:11.720 --> 00:11:16.799
<v Speaker 2>clean tech revolution to energy prosperity and to growth, and

206
00:11:16.879 --> 00:11:20.679
<v Speaker 2>they will use these new technologies in the same way

207
00:11:20.759 --> 00:11:23.759
<v Speaker 2>as they would use any new technology in order to

208
00:11:23.799 --> 00:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>satisfy the legitimate desire of their own citizens for more growth.

209
00:11:27.679 --> 00:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And what's happening in Africa and in Latin America and

210
00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:35.159
<v Speaker 2>South Asian Southeast Asia is you are seeing certain wise

211
00:11:35.240 --> 00:11:39.519
<v Speaker 2>government deploying clean energy technologies in order to get energy

212
00:11:39.559 --> 00:11:42.799
<v Speaker 2>to their citizens, which is cheaper. And to be clear,

213
00:11:43.039 --> 00:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the global South is a net fossil fuel importer, just

214
00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like Europe and China and India. They don't have a

215
00:11:51.000 --> 00:11:54.039
<v Speaker 2>lot of fossil fuels. They've got sixty percent of global population,

216
00:11:54.559 --> 00:11:59.320
<v Speaker 2>but twenty percent of fossil fuel production and reserves and

217
00:11:59.519 --> 00:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent of global renewable potential. So these folks, of

218
00:12:04.200 --> 00:12:06.919
<v Speaker 2>course they're going to embrace renewables now that the prices

219
00:12:06.919 --> 00:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>have fallen. So they're basically two barriers in the way

220
00:12:09.759 --> 00:12:13.039
<v Speaker 2>of change in the global cell. The first barrier, not

221
00:12:13.120 --> 00:12:15.639
<v Speaker 2>work can necessarily solved on this podcast, is the fact

222
00:12:15.679 --> 00:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>that some elites make so much money out of fossil

223
00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>fuels that they like to continue to important use them.

224
00:12:21.519 --> 00:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of a very specific issue one hundred percent.

225
00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>But the second issue which has been holding back change

226
00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>is capex and the observation that the capital costs of

227
00:12:30.879 --> 00:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>clean tech was higher than the capital costs of deploying

228
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuels. Now, of course, because of the collapse in

229
00:12:37.679 --> 00:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>clean tech costs, that is no longer the case. So

230
00:12:40.480 --> 00:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the capital cost if you're building new stuff, the capital

231
00:12:43.000 --> 00:12:46.440
<v Speaker 2>costs of solar is broadly comparable with the capital cost

232
00:12:46.679 --> 00:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>of building coal or gas. And of course you have

233
00:12:50.159 --> 00:12:53.399
<v Speaker 2>the great benefit for the next thirty years. You don't

234
00:12:53.399 --> 00:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>have to fork out ten dollars per remember to you

235
00:12:56.120 --> 00:12:59.039
<v Speaker 2>to buy your energy whatever it is. So what we're seeing,

236
00:12:59.039 --> 00:13:03.440
<v Speaker 2>of course, is a tenuous shrinkage in reasons not to

237
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>deploy clean energy technologies in the Global South. And if

238
00:13:07.080 --> 00:13:09.679
<v Speaker 2>I may give you one further observation of what's happening

239
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:12.039
<v Speaker 2>across the global self, there is this perception that people

240
00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>are not changing. Actually, folks, they are. We're writing in

241
00:13:15.759 --> 00:13:18.039
<v Speaker 2>port of this. At the moment, sixty percent of countries

242
00:13:18.240 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Global South have already passed the five percent

243
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:24.799
<v Speaker 2>tipping point in solar wind as a share of electricity generation.

244
00:13:25.600 --> 00:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Thirty three percent have already seen peak fossil fuel demand. That,

245
00:13:28.960 --> 00:13:31.639
<v Speaker 2>as I say, is cross Latin America, in Thailand, in

246
00:13:31.679 --> 00:13:34.879
<v Speaker 2>South Africa, in a series of other countries around the world,

247
00:13:35.039 --> 00:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, twenty percent Girarda doing exactly what you

248
00:13:37.639 --> 00:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>suggest and have elite frogged. What's going on in the west.

249
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:43.639
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm with you on this one one hundred percent.

250
00:13:44.039 --> 00:13:46.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's putticy. I thinking about this

251
00:13:46.320 --> 00:13:49.639
<v Speaker 3>pain point. I was in South Africa six months ago

252
00:13:49.759 --> 00:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and at seven pm you had blackouts everywhere in Cape

253
00:13:53.240 --> 00:13:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Town and there were start to disoginerate ours, every shop.

254
00:13:57.000 --> 00:13:59.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, they gues, oh you know we're putting putting sola.

255
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Next year, were fed up with s com You look

256
00:14:02.639 --> 00:14:06.720
<v Speaker 3>at Nigeria, the moment they stop subsidizing oil, it was

257
00:14:06.759 --> 00:14:10.679
<v Speaker 3>a solar alboom. I can foresee next year it's gonna

258
00:14:10.679 --> 00:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>be Egypt because EGIP has been relying on this gas

259
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:16.159
<v Speaker 3>field which is not producing. Now they need to import.

260
00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Guess what EGYP is super sunny. Plus the demand is

261
00:14:20.159 --> 00:14:23.080
<v Speaker 3>for cooling during heat waves. So I can foresee Egyp's

262
00:14:23.080 --> 00:14:26.039
<v Speaker 3>going to be a massive, massive, and in a more

263
00:14:26.159 --> 00:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>sinister but nevertheless interesting negdotal way. The guys who are

264
00:14:31.679 --> 00:14:35.559
<v Speaker 3>the biggest solar installer in Lebanon are the Esbola because

265
00:14:36.480 --> 00:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>it is what it is energy security, right yeah yeah,

266
00:14:39.960 --> 00:14:42.720
<v Speaker 3>So even for people which you don't want to spend

267
00:14:42.759 --> 00:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>your vacation with, sola is the solution. These are just examples,

268
00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:48.480
<v Speaker 3>but I'm with you.

269
00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>A couple of the observations. Globally, we have about one

270
00:14:52.440 --> 00:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred times as much so little inn potential as fossil

271
00:14:55.879 --> 00:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>fuel extraction today, but in the global South it's four

272
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:01.879
<v Speaker 2>hundred times because they lack fossil fuels, they have a

273
00:15:01.919 --> 00:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of your space. Actually for these countries and for

274
00:15:05.200 --> 00:15:07.799
<v Speaker 2>everyone around the world, we have new options at the moment,

275
00:15:07.840 --> 00:15:09.519
<v Speaker 2>I think this is what we really want to get across.

276
00:15:10.159 --> 00:15:12.559
<v Speaker 2>A lot of them modeling being done by Xon and

277
00:15:12.639 --> 00:15:15.559
<v Speaker 2>other folks in the fossil system. They're modeling the current system.

278
00:15:15.600 --> 00:15:19.399
<v Speaker 2>They're not thinking about the new, They're modelling old. And

279
00:15:19.519 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>what you want to do is you want to model

280
00:15:21.279 --> 00:15:24.679
<v Speaker 2>the suite of possibilities that people across the globalself have

281
00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in front of them today. So going to be you

282
00:15:27.279 --> 00:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a householder or a small business, or or a large business,

283
00:15:31.080 --> 00:15:34.279
<v Speaker 2>or a utility you can install so lead any level

284
00:15:34.720 --> 00:15:36.759
<v Speaker 2>and that can then get you energy where you had

285
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Number four. If I may come also, folks to at

286
00:15:39.279 --> 00:15:42.399
<v Speaker 2>this point about political economy and resistance to change, which

287
00:15:42.399 --> 00:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess is ultimately going to become the primary reason

288
00:15:46.039 --> 00:15:49.279
<v Speaker 2>why people don't deploy clean tech because they leaks make

289
00:15:49.360 --> 00:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>so much money from the current system. So let's think

290
00:15:52.399 --> 00:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>for a second about how big resistance is. So if

291
00:15:55.639 --> 00:15:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I go back to my framing before, if they're being

292
00:15:57.799 --> 00:16:01.240
<v Speaker 2>four parts to the world, the OECD, the Global SEUTH,

293
00:16:01.320 --> 00:16:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and the petro region petro regions add the whole lot

294
00:16:04.720 --> 00:16:06.639
<v Speaker 2>up to about five percent of global population, about ten

295
00:16:06.679 --> 00:16:09.879
<v Speaker 2>percent of energy demod that's kind of a separate bucket.

296
00:16:10.360 --> 00:16:13.159
<v Speaker 2>They need to change, but the political resistance to change

297
00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:16.559
<v Speaker 2>will be very, very powerful. But within the global South,

298
00:16:16.919 --> 00:16:20.519
<v Speaker 2>only five percent of demand is coming from petro states,

299
00:16:20.559 --> 00:16:24.559
<v Speaker 2>places like Equatorial Guinea or Guiana for example. It's five

300
00:16:24.600 --> 00:16:27.639
<v Speaker 2>percent of demand. And there's a further six percent of

301
00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>demand which is coming from countries which are major fossil

302
00:16:31.440 --> 00:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>fuel exporters, such as Nigeria. So that's basically about another

303
00:16:35.039 --> 00:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>ten or eleven percent. These are simply going to be

304
00:16:38.679 --> 00:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the last people to change, but that's not going to

305
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:44.759
<v Speaker 2>stop changing the system as a whole. And there are

306
00:16:44.759 --> 00:16:47.399
<v Speaker 2>a couple of classic analogies which I would love to

307
00:16:47.399 --> 00:16:50.559
<v Speaker 2>get across because if very often missed that you don't

308
00:16:50.679 --> 00:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>need to worry too much about endgame problems. Think, for example,

309
00:16:54.320 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>about electricity electricity was invented in nineteenth century and then

310
00:16:58.480 --> 00:17:01.039
<v Speaker 2>started to get deployed and run nineteen hundred and here

311
00:17:01.039 --> 00:17:03.559
<v Speaker 2>we are in twenty twenty four. We still have ten

312
00:17:03.600 --> 00:17:07.039
<v Speaker 2>percent of the global population which doesn't have electricity, But

313
00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:09.400
<v Speaker 2>nobody is saying that the fact that ten percent of

314
00:17:09.400 --> 00:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>people don't have electricity means that electricity doesn't work or

315
00:17:13.279 --> 00:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the electricity is not going to have a major impact

316
00:17:15.319 --> 00:17:18.160
<v Speaker 2>upon the world. And equally, if you look at the Internet,

317
00:17:18.559 --> 00:17:21.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty three percent of people still don't have internet access,

318
00:17:21.559 --> 00:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>but Internet has nevertheless radically changed the world. And it's

319
00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:28.279
<v Speaker 2>the same thing here solar win. Today's about fifteen percent

320
00:17:28.319 --> 00:17:31.319
<v Speaker 2>of global supply. It's going up towards forty to fifty

321
00:17:31.440 --> 00:17:34.839
<v Speaker 2>sixty leaders are above fifty percent, and as it does that,

322
00:17:34.880 --> 00:17:38.279
<v Speaker 2>it will radically change and disrupt the current system long

323
00:17:38.319 --> 00:17:40.279
<v Speaker 2>before you get to any of these endgames.

324
00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Kings, Well, I'm hearing a lot of positive news from you.

325
00:17:44.599 --> 00:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing that we haven't talked about, which I

326
00:17:46.880 --> 00:17:48.759
<v Speaker 1>think is a correlation of all of this, which is

327
00:17:49.079 --> 00:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions. We must be close to global peak emissions.

328
00:17:53.519 --> 00:17:57.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're right, it looks as if we are at

329
00:17:57.039 --> 00:18:01.559
<v Speaker 2>the peak of global emissions coincident with peak fossil fuel

330
00:18:01.599 --> 00:18:03.839
<v Speaker 2>demand because of the growth, the very rapid growth of

331
00:18:03.880 --> 00:18:07.599
<v Speaker 2>these clean energy technologies. If you look, for example, at

332
00:18:07.640 --> 00:18:11.440
<v Speaker 2>emissions per person, emissions per person have clearly fallen off

333
00:18:11.480 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the global peak for about five years beyond peak emissions

334
00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:18.759
<v Speaker 2>per person. That's a kind of harbinger of the change

335
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:21.519
<v Speaker 2>to come. And you combine this peak emission series to

336
00:18:21.559 --> 00:18:24.839
<v Speaker 2>deep peaking emissions in China and then those two being

337
00:18:24.880 --> 00:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>sufficient to drive decline at a global level. But as

338
00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>you say, Gerard, it's a start. There's always a distinction

339
00:18:31.240 --> 00:18:34.519
<v Speaker 2>to be made between the argument we make that there's

340
00:18:34.599 --> 00:18:39.200
<v Speaker 2>disruption coming to the fossil fuel system, which is absolutely obvious,

341
00:18:39.680 --> 00:18:43.519
<v Speaker 2>versus will we drive emissions down quickly to get to

342
00:18:43.559 --> 00:18:47.759
<v Speaker 2>a certain temperature target where it's still completely moot. And

343
00:18:48.039 --> 00:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I agree with what the scientists are telling us, and

344
00:18:50.559 --> 00:18:53.039
<v Speaker 2>we need to do a lot more to get to

345
00:18:53.240 --> 00:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>what point five degrees or even two degrees than we're

346
00:18:55.519 --> 00:18:58.880
<v Speaker 2>currently doing. But that's a different debate to the fact

347
00:18:58.960 --> 00:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>that the current fossil fuel system is going to be

348
00:19:01.279 --> 00:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>disrupted whatever happens.

349
00:19:03.680 --> 00:19:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about carbon accounting, but what is sure

350
00:19:06.799 --> 00:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>is that although we kind of have a decent idea

351
00:19:09.359 --> 00:19:11.839
<v Speaker 3>of what's going out of the tailpipes. There are a

352
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of problems upstream with the methane. Here. I want

353
00:19:16.279 --> 00:19:19.000
<v Speaker 3>to do a shout out with a wonderful woman called

354
00:19:19.039 --> 00:19:22.599
<v Speaker 3>Sean Wilson. She's in Texas and she has a special

355
00:19:22.720 --> 00:19:25.599
<v Speaker 3>camera and she checks all the gas wells and you

356
00:19:25.640 --> 00:19:28.599
<v Speaker 3>know they are spewing methane and after they are not

357
00:19:28.720 --> 00:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>reporting them to to the EPA. So I mean, this

358
00:19:31.119 --> 00:19:34.839
<v Speaker 3>is a real ecoher of ours. And I think there

359
00:19:34.839 --> 00:19:38.119
<v Speaker 3>are much more methane emissions that are reported for at

360
00:19:38.319 --> 00:19:41.799
<v Speaker 3>those big cups and so on. That's number one. Then

361
00:19:41.839 --> 00:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>this is the all effect about deforestation. I don't know

362
00:19:44.240 --> 00:19:47.279
<v Speaker 3>how well it is master or not. The fight continues,

363
00:19:47.319 --> 00:19:48.079
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion.

364
00:19:48.759 --> 00:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I'd also like to give a shout out to my

365
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:54.079
<v Speaker 2>starn Oscar who is also working to reduce methane emissions

366
00:19:54.119 --> 00:19:57.680
<v Speaker 2>in the UK system, and lots of heroes all across

367
00:19:57.720 --> 00:19:59.799
<v Speaker 2>the world who seeking to do that and reduce the

368
00:20:00.519 --> 00:20:03.079
<v Speaker 2>But Laur, I think you might have gone a little

369
00:20:03.079 --> 00:20:05.440
<v Speaker 2>bit above my pay grade in terms of what I

370
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:07.759
<v Speaker 2>actually know much about, which is the change in the

371
00:20:07.920 --> 00:20:11.400
<v Speaker 2>energy system that clenty many other pieces and as you say,

372
00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:15.759
<v Speaker 2>it's very important that we curtail deforestation and reduce methane losses.

373
00:20:16.559 --> 00:20:18.160
<v Speaker 2>There is one point I would make where there is

374
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:22.839
<v Speaker 2>an intersection with energy, which is the use of biomass

375
00:20:22.880 --> 00:20:27.839
<v Speaker 2>to generate electricity is one of the most spectacularly stupid

376
00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:32.799
<v Speaker 2>and wasteful ways to pour resources away, and we shouldn't

377
00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>do it because it hardly reduces your carbon emotions. It's

378
00:20:36.039 --> 00:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>incredibly inefficient, and now we have far superior ways of

379
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:45.799
<v Speaker 2>generating electricity. Getting sunshine or getting electrons via a tree

380
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:50.599
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely crazy way to get electricity in twenty twenty four,

381
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and actually stopping the use of biomass to produce electricity

382
00:20:56.000 --> 00:20:57.920
<v Speaker 2>would actually free up a lot of space which we

383
00:20:57.960 --> 00:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>could be using for reforestation also, so pree up pressure

384
00:21:01.039 --> 00:21:03.640
<v Speaker 2>upon land in many different areas is not of course

385
00:21:03.759 --> 00:21:08.559
<v Speaker 2>just pres also biomass for driving, which is another incredibly

386
00:21:08.599 --> 00:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>wasteful use of resources now that we have far superior resources.

387
00:21:12.000 --> 00:21:14.759
<v Speaker 2>So that's where for me the intersection lies, and that's

388
00:21:14.799 --> 00:21:16.759
<v Speaker 2>where if we can free up, as I say, this

389
00:21:16.960 --> 00:21:19.279
<v Speaker 2>land that needs resources to try and tackle the global

390
00:21:19.279 --> 00:21:19.839
<v Speaker 2>warming problem.

391
00:21:19.839 --> 00:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>From another angle, kings Mid, we took a lot about

392
00:21:23.559 --> 00:21:26.920
<v Speaker 3>supply and not really about demand. And I know that

393
00:21:27.039 --> 00:21:29.319
<v Speaker 3>RMI is doing a lot of work in energy efficiency,

394
00:21:29.400 --> 00:21:32.000
<v Speaker 3>so maybe in conclusion you want to talk a bit

395
00:21:32.039 --> 00:21:32.440
<v Speaker 3>about that.

396
00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Sure, thank you. Efficiency again is a supremely complex topic,

397
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:40.480
<v Speaker 2>but there is a way pioneered by Nickair at Oxford

398
00:21:40.599 --> 00:21:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to simplify an extremely complex debate in its simplest terms.

399
00:21:44.480 --> 00:21:48.559
<v Speaker 2>We are currently pouring half of our heat sources, that

400
00:21:48.680 --> 00:21:51.799
<v Speaker 2>is to say, col oil, and gas into work uses,

401
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that is to say, electricity and driving, and there is

402
00:21:55.920 --> 00:22:00.799
<v Speaker 2>an absolutely physical, inevitable two thirds loss of conting heat

403
00:22:01.279 --> 00:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>into work, and this is a huge waste of resource.

404
00:22:07.079 --> 00:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Now we have a way of converting work into work.

405
00:22:09.440 --> 00:22:13.119
<v Speaker 2>It's called sunshine and solar panels, and that goes straight

406
00:22:13.200 --> 00:22:16.759
<v Speaker 2>into work in electricity, goes straight into work in cars,

407
00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>and that is creating a once in a generation opportunity

408
00:22:21.960 --> 00:22:27.319
<v Speaker 2>to significantly increase the efficiency of the energy system in

409
00:22:27.359 --> 00:22:30.519
<v Speaker 2>the same way as the replacement of biomass with coal

410
00:22:30.599 --> 00:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>or the replacement of coal with oil, the replacement of

411
00:22:33.559 --> 00:22:37.559
<v Speaker 2>heat technologies with work technologies in the twenty twenties will

412
00:22:37.599 --> 00:22:42.160
<v Speaker 2>significantly increase efficiency, and that efficiency gain will make the

413
00:22:42.279 --> 00:22:44.519
<v Speaker 2>energy transition much easier.

414
00:22:45.240 --> 00:22:47.759
<v Speaker 3>Jings Mila, thank you so much for coming on the show.

415
00:22:48.039 --> 00:22:51.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll still won't be invited at Sarah Week, but I

416
00:22:51.519 --> 00:22:52.079
<v Speaker 3>don't care.

417
00:22:55.680 --> 00:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Great avenue, my friend, great avenue.

418
00:22:57.640 --> 00:23:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Fig Laurel, thank you for art, for the opportunity to state.

419
00:23:00.880 --> 00:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

420
00:23:07.319 --> 00:23:10.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, Joab. It's always a great pleasure to have a

421
00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>conversation with Kingsmith.

422
00:23:12.839 --> 00:23:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's great, right, and this listen, it's an

423
00:23:15.319 --> 00:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>experienced analyst. It's been at this far a long long while,

424
00:23:17.960 --> 00:23:21.279
<v Speaker 1>and I just love it. Vision and passion right. And

425
00:23:21.480 --> 00:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>also it does have a contrarian view, although he'll tell

426
00:23:24.480 --> 00:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you it's not contrary, but in the world we live today,

427
00:23:27.519 --> 00:23:29.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the incumbents have the power, so it is

428
00:23:29.599 --> 00:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a contrarian view.

429
00:23:31.279 --> 00:23:34.240
<v Speaker 3>One of his main thesis and are really abide by

430
00:23:34.319 --> 00:23:38.000
<v Speaker 3>it is that on one hand, you've got the commodities well,

431
00:23:38.359 --> 00:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>and they think arithmetically, and on the other you've got

432
00:23:42.200 --> 00:23:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the technological world and they think geometrically, and the pace

433
00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:53.079
<v Speaker 3>of innovation the commodities is very low, whereas in the

434
00:23:53.160 --> 00:23:57.480
<v Speaker 3>technology world is very fast. And let's be clear, solar batteries,

435
00:23:57.480 --> 00:24:00.400
<v Speaker 3>these are technologies. These are not commodities. Not going to

436
00:24:00.440 --> 00:24:01.440
<v Speaker 3>be a one for one.

437
00:24:02.079 --> 00:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very good way. I put that wrong,

438
00:24:04.319 --> 00:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And actually the thing is you're right to say geometric,

439
00:24:07.240 --> 00:24:10.079
<v Speaker 1>but also some of them are exponential, because if I

440
00:24:10.119 --> 00:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on in bat Race, I mean

441
00:24:12.119 --> 00:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's exponential. It's the cost reductions we've seen, you know,

442
00:24:16.440 --> 00:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the scale up in supply and demand. It's just been

443
00:24:20.359 --> 00:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>mind bobbing.

444
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. In conclusion, and that's really for if you're industry friends.

445
00:24:28.279 --> 00:24:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Following sentence, I heard somewhere. I don't know who said it,

446
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:37.039
<v Speaker 3>but it's brilliant. In the present, the pussimist always sounds smarter,

447
00:24:37.960 --> 00:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>but in the long term, optimists are always right.

448
00:24:42.079 --> 00:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Who well said. I'm glad I'll be right at some

449
00:24:44.519 --> 00:24:45.079
<v Speaker 1>point my life.

450
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Lauren.

451
00:24:45.519 --> 00:24:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for the patcham, but that's a

452
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>good way of.

453
00:24:49.079 --> 00:24:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Summing it up exactly, So, Joab, we thank King's Mill

454
00:24:53.480 --> 00:24:55.880
<v Speaker 3>for coming on the show, and I took to you

455
00:24:55.960 --> 00:24:57.400
<v Speaker 3>next week looking.

456
00:24:57.119 --> 00:25:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Forward to it. Thank you for listening to Redefining Energy.

457
00:25:04.759 --> 00:25:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to read the show and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

458
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:12.519
<v Speaker 1>or the platform of your choice.
