Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of The
Diddy Diaries. In this episode, we're picking up where we
left off with the Sarah Rivers lawsuit filed against Ditty
upon information and belief defendant profited from the enterprise and
use the proceeds from the enterprise to advance the enterprise
by funding and operating their marketing machine, including through the
use of the mail, television coverage, word of mouth, and
interstate wires to sell the illusion that Defendant Ditty was
a serious and legitimate businessman who made regular people into
music stars. Defendant Ditty, bb E, Harve Tracy, Allison, Chris Devine,
Norma Farnsworth, Defat Mickey D Dot, Jason Phil Sean, Daddy's House,
UMG UMG Distribution, Janics, JCP, jcph SJC, Paramount, VIACOM, MTV,
Jackie Lou, BM King and those were a direct participant
in the marketing aspect of the scheme, as it was
defendants BM and MTV who created the show idea, marketed
the idea to potential contestants, and paid for contestants to
travel to participate on the show. Defendants Harve, Tracy, Allison,
Chris Divine, Norma, Fonnsworth, Do fatmickeyd Dot, Jason, Phil Sewan, Jackie,
and Lou all appeared on the television show to further
the enterprise and conceal their intentions from their participants. Defendants Janets, JCP,
and JCP ensured that the enterprise owned any intellectual property
produced by plaintiff. Defendants BM and MTV provided the general
public at large misrepresentative information, including over interstate television wire
line communication systems, via their television show MTB two. Upon
information and belief, defendants obtained revenue via wire transfers, documents,
and banking transactions that were exchanged via electronic means over
interstate wires, thereby growing the enterprise and call using further
injury to plaintiff. As described throughout, defendant scheme was reasonably
calculated to deceive plaintiff of ordinary prudence and comprehension through
the execution of their complex and illegal scheme to misrepresent
the true purpose of defending Ditty's television show MTB two
that would lead to assault, battery, or overall danger to plaintiff,
Plaintiff would have never engaged in any regard with defendant
Ditty if not but for the complex and illegal racketeering
scheme operated by defendants. Upon information and belief, defendants each
had the specific intent to participate in the overall reco
enterprise scheme, and each participated in the enterprise as follows.
Upon information and belief, Defendants control and participate in the
activities of the enterprise in a variety of ways is
set forth here in, including but not limited to, developing
marketing campaign to rebrand defendan Ditty after his two thousand
and one nightclub shooting trial to the general public. Upon
an information and belief throughout the relevant period, Defendants Harves, Tracy, Alison, Chris, Divine,
Norma Fonsworth, DOFAT, Mickey d Dot, Jason, Phil Sean, Daddy's House,
UMG UMG Distribution, Janice JCP, JCPH Paramount, VIACOM, MTV, Jackie
B M King and Does entered into a partnership agreement
with defendant Diddy, s JC, and BB as general business partners.
Each member is responsible for the partner's actions in the partnership.
Defendants have an ethical obligation to ensure their business partners
were not using the partnership to engage in a legal activity.
Defendants Harve Tracy, Alison, Chris, Divine, Norma, Fonnsworth, Dofat, Mickey
d Dot, Jason, Phil Sean, Daddy's House, umg UMG Distribution, Janice, JCP, Jcph,
s JC, Paramount, Viacom, MTV, Jackie Lou, BM King, and
those provided resources to their general business partners Defendants Diddy, SJC,
and BBE. Defendant Diddy, SJC and BBE use the resources
provided by their general business partners to entice the public
to want to audition for Defendant Diddy and watch the
television show MTB two. Defendant Diddy and his co conspirators
relied on the mail, worldwide Web, and telephone to disseminate
the misleading information described here in. Defendants did not disclose
to the individual they solicited the fact that they would
be exploited, harassed, abused, assaulted, or battered while participating in
the making of the band sponsored by and starring defendants
and their businesses. Defendants Harve, Tracy, Allison, Chris Devine, Norma, Fonsworth,
do Fat, Mickey d Dot, Jason, Phil, Sean, Daddy's House,
umg UNGG Distribution, Janics, JCP, JCPH, Paramount, Viacom, MTV, Jackie Lou,
b M King, and DOZ authorize the resources to their
general business partner, defendant Ditty in furtherance of the goals
of the conspiracy. Defendant used this television show MTB two
as a ruse to provide Defendan Ditty, SJC, and BB
covered to disguise their covert reco enterprise. Throughout the relevant period,
defendants use their collective resources, relying on the mail, email, radio,
and worldwide Web, to disseminate the misleading information described herein.
As the general business partner of Defendan Didty, SJC, and BBE,
defendants are equally liable for the commission of these acts.
Defendants bm MTV, and BB insured cash payments to plaintiff
were executed. Plaintiff does not recall receiving appropriate United States
Federal tax documents for payments or the value of the trip,
as if they independently declared these payments on their taxes.
It's unclear if defendant requested an audit of defending Ditty's
business financial records to ensure the resources pro invited to
Defendant Diddy was not being used to fund the legal activity.
During the ten years preceding the filing, of this action
and to the present, all defendants did cooperate jointly and
severally in the commission of predicate acts itemized in US
Code eighteen, section nineteen sixty one one, in violation of
US Code eighteen, Section nineteen sixty two D as described
in this complaint, beginning at an exact date unknown to plaintiff,
but within ten years preceding the filing of this action,
defendants have knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully participated in a pattern
of racketeering activity that continues, possibly to this day. The
racketeering acts followed the same pattern and purpose to defraud
the plaintiff for the defendant's benefit. Each racketeering act involved
the same or similar methods of commission and participants. Defendant's
business would not have succeeded without the repeated predicate acts
and the ability to conduct their fraud using mail, telecommunity cations, wires,
interstate travel, and possibly money laundering. The racketeering acts all
relate to each other in that they were a part
of a concerted action by defendants to use the endorsement
and channels of the enterprise to operate their business to
solicit potential victims. As detailed here in, the separate racketeering
acts all relate to each other in that they were
a part of the concerted actions by defendants to use
the endorsement and channels of the enterprise to operate their
businesses to fraudully induce plaintiff. Defendant's wrongful conduct is injured
plaintiff and continues to threaten plaintiff to the public. Defendants
association with the enterprise enabled defendant to conduct direct and
control a pattern of fraudulent, illegal activities over a substantial
number of years, which continues to this day. To further
their collective goals, defendants worked in concert to engage in
various forms of criminal activity at the direction and demand
of defendant. Calms defendants ongoing racketeering activity as injured and
continues to injure plaintiff. Defendants committed multiple acts of mail
fraud and violation of US Code eighteen, Section thirteen forty one.
In furtherance of the enterprise, Defendants voluntarily and intentionally devised
and participated in a scheme with the intent to defraud plaintiff.
Defendants use the mail to execute the fraudulent scheme. Herein specifically,
the defendants agreed to each of the acts of mail
fraud described throughout this complaint. In addition, they agreed to
rely on the mail to distribute their marketing material, contest instructions,
secure wires, and cash payments from other participants in the
scheme in furtherance of and four purposes of executing of
the above describe fraudulent and a legal course of conduct
in scheme to defraud, Defendants, either individually or in combination
with themselves, used in cause to be used the US
Mail by both placing and causing to be placed marketing materials, advertisements, agreements,
and other matters in depositories, and by removing or causing
to be removed letters and other mailable matters from depositories
in violation of the Mail Fraud Statute US Code eighteen,
Section thirteen forty one. Defendants could not have furthered their
fraudulent scheme without the use of the mail. For example,
without the male, defendants would be unable to conduct any
business relevant to its purpose creation. Defendants also required the
mail to distribute misleading advertisements to various states. For those reasons,
the use of mail to conduct fraudulent activity was necessary
and inevitable. Defendants committed multiple acts of wire fraud and
violation of US Code eighteen, section thirteen forty three. In
furtherance of the enterprise, Defendants voluntarily and intentionally devised and
participated in a scheme with the intent of the fraud plaintiff.
Defendants agreed to each of the acts of wire fraud
described Herein Additionally, defendants agreed to rely on interstate wires
to disseminate funds to others in the enterprise. Defendants illegally
acquired and utilized wire transfers to further their collective goal
of furthering their reco enterprise. Defendants agreed that defendants should
facilitate these fraudulent purchases over interstate wires and furtherance of
their scheme. In furtherance of and for the purpose of
executing the above describe fraudulent and a legal course of
conduct in scheme or artifice to defraud. Defendants, either individually
or in combination with themselves, used or caused to be
used interstate wire communications to transmit or disseminate false, fraudulent,
and misleading communications and information in violation of the wire
fraud statue. US Code eighteen, section thirteen forty three. Defendants
could not have furthered their fraudulent scheme Without the ability
to use telecommunications to share information with clients and retailers nationwide.
Defendants needed to communicate with clients and retailers around the
country utilizing interstate telecommunication wires to conduct the fraudulent activity,
which was necessary and inevitable to use. Plaintiffs have been
damaged in her business, to or property because defendants violated
US Code eighteen, Section nineteen sixty two AC and D,
and therefore plaintiff is entitled to recover the damages and
other remedies enumerated therein. Defendants acts or omissions were actuated
by actual malice and a wilful and wanton disregard for
the consequences suffered by plaintiff, were directed towards her because
of her gender, and with knowledge of a high degree
of probability of harm to plaintiff and reckless indifference to
the consequences of their actions or omissions. Compensatory damages alone
will be insufficient to deter such conduct in the future.
There needs to be a criminal referral to the United
States Justice Department as well as the state's Attorney General's office. Wherefore,
plaintiff requests that the Court issue in order in gret
judgment to the plaintiff as follows, grant plaintiff statutory common
law and punitive damages and applicable pre and post judgment
interest in full recompense for damages enter judgment according to
the declaratory relief saught, Grant plaintiffs such other and further relief,
including without limitation, injunctive and equitable relief as the Court
deems just in all these circumstances, and grant plaintiff an
incentive or service award reflective of the work done in
prosecuting this action, the time spent, the effort and hard
costs invested, and results obtained in light of the Court's
judgment informed by awards and other similar cases of comparable
difficulty and complexity. All right, we're going to wrap this
one up right here, and in the next episode we're
going to pick up with the second cause of action.
All of the information, including my contact information, can be
found in the description box.