Speaker 1: So insane, so insane.
Speaker 2: It is so insane. Bunker bunker, bunker.
Speaker 3: Loco.
Speaker 4: I got married. I got married to a funk. We
Speaker 4: got wedded, conjoined in the subway.
Speaker 5: He shot o.
Speaker 4: I am married. I'm married to Mauco. But we got
Speaker 4: joined co write is soon a subway shot.
Speaker 6: Vitamins and biscuits and minerals they come to even to
Speaker 6: My whole life is spent.
Speaker 5: What he got to? Tom m hmm, what.
Speaker 6: Of world?
Speaker 3: I'm married to amonger who.
Speaker 4: We got wedding, we got joined in the subway, shot
Speaker 4: over the road, and minerals then come to you to.
Speaker 6: And minerals then come from this year too.
Speaker 3: Fun bunk.
Speaker 4: I got married. I got married to my bunk huber
Speaker 4: who we got waded? Who we got joined?
Speaker 6: Somewhere shall I'm gonna show off something that we're all
Speaker 6: proud of. I got a browser here.
Speaker 5: This is uh jayder.
Speaker 7: I'm married to a buncle pop oh.
Speaker 8: Oh, we got better at conjoined in a subway shop.
Speaker 7: Oh oh, I'm married to a buncle pop oh by
Speaker 7: a man's metals. They come to me through a tube.
Speaker 7: My whole life it's been watching on tu whoa oh.
Speaker 8: Oh, we got weard it courtius then a subway shop.
Speaker 8: Oh we got weard a courtis in a subway shop.
Speaker 8: Oh we got wetted court us there in a subway shop.
Speaker 9: Oh oh, I got every too a fuck pap.
Speaker 10: Whoa we got ready conjoint in the subway shop for.
Speaker 7: I'm married to uncle Paphoa.
Speaker 10: I imagine made Rosie come to me through to bo
Speaker 10: like a stick watching.
Speaker 5: Down the tub.
Speaker 7: Whoa, whoa open.
Speaker 9: Ready joint to say the subway shot over?
Speaker 10: We got waiting for the s subway shops out.
Speaker 6: A welcome everybody. I wanted to remind you that you
Speaker 6: are my little Internet children, and I'm wearing a wholesome
Speaker 6: button up, dad core button up perhaps something that your
Speaker 6: own daddy is where I'm not physically biologically your daddy,
Speaker 6: although some of you might want to check with your
Speaker 6: mom to make sure that that is or isn't the case.
Speaker 6: I am, however, your mind daddy today, and just think
Speaker 6: of me as a wholesome dad core button up kind
Speaker 6: of dude today. Today we're going to have a nice
Speaker 6: chill conversation about the Tavistock institute the world's foremost brainwashing entity.
Speaker 6: Now I know for sure that I did an analysis
Speaker 6: of this, because I have a ton of notes, but
Speaker 6: I don't know where that analysis is. I want to
Speaker 6: say that maybe something happened to where I had to
Speaker 6: make it a private talk. I don't remember. It seems
Speaker 6: like maybe maybe a year ago we covered this, but
Speaker 6: I couldn't find where I covered it. So I began
Speaker 6: reading another book, as you guys know, which I have
Speaker 6: mentioned off and on, and I'm just kind of reading
Speaker 6: this one here and there, various chapters, and this is
Speaker 6: Coleman's book on socialism, One World Order, Socialist Dictation, and
Speaker 6: it's yet another history of the Tavist, I mean not
Speaker 6: Tavist talk of Fabian socialism. And of course yes it
Speaker 6: does correct connect directly to the ralph Child Empire, so
Speaker 6: that is part of this story. But this book goes
Speaker 6: really deep into the history of the FDR period and
Speaker 6: then prior to that, Woodrow Wilson and how Wilson and
Speaker 6: FDR were really the central pivot figures to move America
Speaker 6: into socialism. And of course you guys know that today
Speaker 6: we live definitely under an America that is heavily socialized
Speaker 6: in the classical Fabian socialist sense, not in a outright
Speaker 6: hardcore Marxist sense. And one thing that I appreciate about
Speaker 6: doctor Coleman, whatever you think about him, And we do
Speaker 6: have criticisms that we're going to make, so we'll get
Speaker 6: to that right away at the very beginning, before you
Speaker 6: just assume that I'm taking wholesale everything that Coleman says.
Speaker 6: I'm very aware of the criticisms, and I have criticisms
Speaker 6: too of his books. The weaknesses he does point out
Speaker 6: that I think is worth giving him credit for. On
Speaker 6: the back of the book which he wrote this in
Speaker 6: nineteen ninety eight, he said, while our attention was focused
Speaker 6: on communism in Moscow, it was actually the socialist in
Speaker 6: Washington that were actually stealing America. So he was on
Speaker 6: the right track, okay, and he did get some things wrong.
Speaker 6: He made some goofy mistakes. Now I'm very aware of
Speaker 6: Richard Grove's criticisms. I've had long conversations with Richard Grove
Speaker 6: about this book and Coleman's other books, and particularly as
Speaker 6: you guys know, we did do a full lecture through
Speaker 6: committee a three hundred maybe a year ago. But what's
Speaker 6: come back into print recently is his Tabostop book. And
Speaker 6: this was out of print for about ten years. You
Speaker 6: could not find this book for about ten years. My
Speaker 6: allergies are going crazy due to the cocaine that I
Speaker 6: snorted in giant twenty Montenna style pile. I got a
Speaker 6: Tonia Montana style pile of cocaine. Now I'm about to
Speaker 6: do a bunch of rogain. Now I'm about to do
Speaker 6: a bunch of Now I'm about to have a migraine.
Speaker 6: Y'all like that freestyle Tavista, I can see human relation.
Speaker 6: We did do a talk through this book again a year.
Speaker 6: I don't know where that talk is. I have no idea.
Speaker 6: I mean, I think it's somewhere, maybe for members. But
Speaker 6: I want to compare it to the official History of Tavistock.
Speaker 6: So we're going to see what did Coleman get correct?
Speaker 6: What things lined up? Now that HV. Dix, He's an
Speaker 6: actual person from Tavistock, and he wrote this history in
Speaker 6: nineteen seventy. It's published by Rutledge, which is an academic
Speaker 6: system based publication. And we're going to notice that a
Speaker 6: lot of the key characters that are mentioned by Coleman
Speaker 6: absolutely make up the official history of Tavistock. And so
Speaker 6: we'll look at a little bit of that and the
Speaker 6: members involved. But the reason we're talking about Tavistak is
Speaker 6: because we couldn't get to where we are without a
Speaker 6: lot of of cunning, strategy, planning and tactics. Now, remember,
Speaker 6: most of the right wing people today, the normy conservative world,
Speaker 6: still has not figured out that it's actually a designed
Speaker 6: plan of what happened. They think that it's just one
Speaker 6: damn thing after another in history. There's no strategy, there's
Speaker 6: no cunning, there's no organizational structure or plan too a
Speaker 6: long term destabilization and destruction of Western civilization. And so
Speaker 6: what we do, as you know, is we lecture through
Speaker 6: on my channel. One of the things we do we
Speaker 6: lecture through the writings of the elite from their perspective.
Speaker 6: That's the majority of the big texts that we've lectured through.
Speaker 6: This is the Global Elite book series. Man, allergies are
Speaker 6: going crazy today, and every now and then we do
Speaker 6: kind of step into the domain of the prophetic conspiracy theorizers.
Speaker 6: And one of those that's very famous and been around
Speaker 6: for a long time is doctor John Coleman. Now we
Speaker 6: don't exactly know for sure if doctor John Coleman really
Speaker 6: was in British intelligence. This is his claim. I'm not
Speaker 6: saying that he wasn't, but I'm not saying that he was.
Speaker 6: We don't exactly know what we have are many of
Speaker 6: his books. If you remember back in the day in
Speaker 6: the old School Lord Baltimore, days before doctor Coleman passed away,
Speaker 6: he was on Lord Baltimore many times. I remember listening
Speaker 6: to many interviews with doctor John Coleman. And there's a
Speaker 6: couple key criticisms we want to make. First of all,
Speaker 6: it would have been good. And again he was Boomer,
Speaker 6: you know, or maybe even a little older than Boomer,
Speaker 6: so he wasn't really interested in kind of sourcing or
Speaker 6: validating the claims. It was just kind of like, hey,
Speaker 6: you know, in British intelligence and I saw a lot
Speaker 6: of things and blah blah blah. Maybe he did, maybe
Speaker 6: he didn't. Right, But here's the thing about the Boomer
Speaker 6: era of this type of crew. I would say he's
Speaker 6: above the Fritz Springmeier class of people. Right, there's definitely
Speaker 6: some there's a lot more meat going on here than
Speaker 6: what we would get from say Fritz. And I'm not
Speaker 6: saying everything Fritz said was wrong, but there's a lot
Speaker 6: of kooky stuff in there, and there's a lot of
Speaker 6: reliance on very goofy, shady sources, right like John Todd,
Speaker 6: who's obviously a kind of a quack con man. And
Speaker 6: I think it really shot the Bloodlin's book in the
Speaker 6: foot for him to rely on these sort of dubious characters.
Speaker 6: But I will say first of all that it's not
Speaker 6: the case that Coleman has no bibliography. The mistake was
Speaker 6: that he didn't actually source the book very well in
Speaker 6: the actual page of the book, and maybe that was
Speaker 6: whoever printed it. But there is a bibliography. Okay, so
Speaker 6: let's see. First of all, maybe let's make this full
Speaker 6: full screen so you can see we do have a bibliography.
Speaker 6: There are quite a few sourced elite texts. They're not
Speaker 6: conspiracy texts. Most of these are in this book. Tavistock Publications.
Speaker 6: We have a lot of the texts that I cover,
Speaker 6: like Burne's and so forth. We've lectured through Brene's, We've
Speaker 6: lectured through some of these other things, doctor Kurt Lewin.
Speaker 6: So we've got Tavistock and Frankfurt School people referenced as sources.
Speaker 6: We've got some of the social engineering elites that you've
Speaker 6: heard me talk about for a long time. We've got Brazenski,
Speaker 6: We've got Hadley Cantrell, We've got Krypskaya, we've got Huxley. Okay,
Speaker 6: these are all sources in the bibliography of Tavistock. We've
Speaker 6: got doctor Gregory bateson keymk Ultra doctor as well, source documents,
Speaker 6: source works. We've got Margaret Meade, Artie Lang fdr. We've
Speaker 6: got several other Tavistock adjacent publications about the organizational man,
Speaker 6: the company man, this kind of stuff. So one, two, three, four, five, six,
Speaker 6: seven pages of bibliography. That's not too bad. Okay, So
Speaker 6: that's not terrible. It would have been nice if he
Speaker 6: had footnoted within the text, but he didn't do that.
Speaker 6: He just wrote the book and then and he does
Speaker 6: have a lot of citations, but we don't know where
Speaker 6: those citations come. So for example, here he cites Tavistock luminary,
Speaker 6: John Rollings Rees, but it doesn't really tell us where
Speaker 6: that comes from. He just says the nineteen fifty four
Speaker 6: from re Okay, so that's a valid criticism. The other
Speaker 6: books are kind of similar. For example, in the One
Speaker 6: World Socialist book, we do have an in notes of sorts.
Speaker 6: So you'll notice that we do have sources. We have
Speaker 6: a lot of CFR publications. This book has a tremendous
Speaker 6: amount of Fabian society publications, so very well sourced in
Speaker 6: that regard, because this book largely argues that socialism in
Speaker 6: America was successful through the Fabians. So here we have
Speaker 6: again another page of bibliography. He does discuss the role
Speaker 6: of Ralph Child of the Zionism plays a role. Another
Speaker 6: page of sources. So is it the case that there's
Speaker 6: no sources. Well, let's look at the other book, The
Speaker 6: Community three hundred, probably the most controversial of the books,
Speaker 6: and it does have a bibliography. Now this one, I
Speaker 6: would argue, is a little more meaty. The sources here
Speaker 6: are actually a little bit better. He even begins his
Speaker 6: sources by saying nineteen eighty four is actually a source
Speaker 6: for Fabian socialist ideology, which is something that we've been
Speaker 6: arguing as well. So you know, well, you'll notice we
Speaker 6: have a lot of older publications about the British Empire
Speaker 6: and Opium plays a big role of in this book.
Speaker 6: I actually bought a couple of these old publications that
Speaker 6: I could find that he mentions Felix Frankfurter, he argues,
Speaker 6: plays a big role. Another one of the key character
Speaker 6: that he identifies that the Rakowski interrogation identified, which again
Speaker 6: makes me think there's probably something to this, is Bruce
Speaker 6: Lockhart Memoirs of a British Agent, and he, as you
Speaker 6: guys remember, was one of the key operatives working to
Speaker 6: be liaison between Lord Milner and the Bolsheviks for British Intelligence. Now,
Speaker 6: the public story was that most of British Intelligence, and
Speaker 6: many of them I think, really did hate and oppose
Speaker 6: the Bolsheviks, but Lord Milner, because he was not necessarily
Speaker 6: opposed to Bolshevism, he was a Fabian. He wanted a
Speaker 6: positive relationship secretly with Bolsheviks, and the key operative for
Speaker 6: that was Bruce Lockhart. And again this is correct. I
Speaker 6: bought a very rare publication of the memoirs of British
Speaker 6: Intelligence operative Bruce Lockhart. This was the guy that I
Speaker 6: couldn't think of his name when we were doing the
Speaker 6: discussion with Tristan. He's not a journalist, he's a British spy.
Speaker 6: Now I have this mainline publication, but the mainline publication
Speaker 6: is I would imagine kind of whitewashed, but you see
Speaker 6: this right here, British agent br r H. Bruce Lockhart.
Speaker 6: I bought that, so I have that text. And in
Speaker 6: the last chapter he discusses his being in Moscow during
Speaker 6: the Bolshevik period. Sorry, I meant to flip over to this.
Speaker 6: There it is. As you can see, that's Bruce Lockhart.
Speaker 6: He's not a journalist. He's one of the most famous,
Speaker 6: lesser known British spies and also someone kind of at
Speaker 6: the level of Bruce Lockhart is Sidney Riley. As we
Speaker 6: talked about, the character who plays a very key role
Speaker 6: in influencing James Bond. Sidney Riley, of course was a
Speaker 6: Jewish spy for the British Empire. Who what do you know?
Speaker 6: He plays both sides? Is he against the Soviets? Is
Speaker 6: he pro Soviet? Well, he's kind of like Lord Victor Rothchild.
Speaker 6: He seems to be on both sides. But to get
Speaker 6: back to the Coleman book, he mentions a lot of
Speaker 6: the texts that you would hear me mention quickly, texts
Speaker 6: that we've gone through all the cecil roads texts are there.
Speaker 6: Now you understand this is not conspiracy theory. This is
Speaker 6: actually mainline intelligence history from Lockhart's own memoirs that he
Speaker 6: was the liaison to the Bolsheviks secretly for the British government.
Speaker 6: So what else do we have in We have Public
Speaker 6: Opinion by Walter Lippmann. Oh, turns out this is a
Speaker 6: key Tavistock text, and that's correct. So Coleman is correct
Speaker 6: about that. We have the whole history of Stanford Research Institute,
Speaker 6: Paul Erlik, the Malthusians are mentioned, history of the rock
Speaker 6: Killer family all mentioned. Razenski comes up again, Diaries of
Speaker 6: Bruce Lockhart, which I just mentioned, Edward Barnet's Engineering of Consent,
Speaker 6: Malachi Martin's History of the Jesuits, which is an odd one.
Speaker 6: I didn't expect that to be here, but it does
Speaker 6: play a role because of course, the Jesuits did, as
Speaker 6: we know from the Weimhoff book, align themselves directly with
Speaker 6: the CIA in America at least through John Courtney Murray
Speaker 6: and others at the time of Vatican two. And that
Speaker 6: is why Vatican two was able to push through so
Speaker 6: many things, so to speak, that were amenable to Americanism
Speaker 6: in the CIA. So we're going pretty deep today. By
Speaker 6: the way. Props to all you Bitcoin maxis and Bitcoin
Speaker 6: holders because we had yet another all time high today,
Speaker 6: so we're looking forward to that one hundred k coming
Speaker 6: pretty soon, I feel sure. So history of the Huxley
Speaker 6: family is in here. Limits to growth, Classics of the
Speaker 6: global elites, roundtable groups, roundtable movement, Jeremy Bentham, the famous
Speaker 6: Utilitarian pdf, Humanistic Psychology, Hadley Cantrell, Instant for Pacific Relations,
Speaker 6: Instanse Social Research. So I think that we could say
Speaker 6: that Coleman's book has flaws, but here's the thing. Overall,
Speaker 6: he pretty much got what the story was correct. The
Speaker 6: other thing that's kind of embarrassing is that he claims
Speaker 6: that the Frankfurt School guys like Adorno wrote the Beatles songs.
Speaker 6: I don't I'm not convinced of that. I've never seen
Speaker 6: evidence of that. That's just kind of an outlandish claim.
Speaker 6: It's just an assertion that he makes. So I think
Speaker 6: in a few places here and there, Coleman will be
Speaker 6: pretty much on the right track. But then they'll kind
Speaker 6: of make these leaps. And we see this unfortunately in
Speaker 6: a lot of this domain right alternative media and the
Speaker 6: so called conspiracy sphere. We've talked about two key fallacies
Speaker 6: that are always there. They always have to watch out for.
Speaker 6: If you guys, remember they are the I'm gonna mention
Speaker 6: the two and then I want to add a third one,
Speaker 6: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy and the gambler's fallacy. Those are
Speaker 6: very common in the conspiracy analysis domain, and they're really
Speaker 6: just kind of variations of because something happened in the past,
Speaker 6: or because I'm very close, then therefore this must have
Speaker 6: been the case, and this must be the conclusion. Right.
Speaker 6: But just because you roll the number five times in
Speaker 6: a row, there's nothing that dictates that you will roll
Speaker 6: a five the fourth time, right, It's a non sequitor.
Speaker 6: And so likewise, because people are associated, it doesn't necessarily
Speaker 6: follow that they are consciously involved in furthering the same agenda.
Speaker 6: They may or they may not be. And even being
Speaker 6: invited to different global events or souirays or whatever does
Speaker 6: not necessarily mean that you knew what's going on, or
Speaker 6: you were fully aware, or you know, you were party
Speaker 6: to the conspiracy. That's why we have to be very
Speaker 6: precise and not lump people together. For example, I get
Speaker 6: lumped in all the time with all kinds of crazy stuff. Oh,
Speaker 6: one time in twenty sixteen, you went on this podcast.
Speaker 6: Therefore you work with these people, right, you must be
Speaker 6: party to their conspiracy. And it's just, you know, simply
Speaker 6: not the case. For example, I went on some podcasts
Speaker 6: in twenty sixteen seventeen, and the people whose podcasts went
Speaker 6: on they went in a totally different direction. I don't
Speaker 6: have any personal like fallout or animosity with these people.
Speaker 6: But for example, a certain podcasts went in the direction
Speaker 6: of neopaganism. I don't believe in neopaganism, and I tried
Speaker 6: to argue and sort of nudge people out of the
Speaker 6: neopagan domain, and those individuals continued in that direction, and
Speaker 6: so I didn't go on that podcast anymore. But it
Speaker 6: has nothing else. It's like I didn't like fall out
Speaker 6: with it. I have some big fire or something like that.
Speaker 6: It's just that's not the direction that I'm going in
Speaker 6: and that's not what I believe. So you see what
Speaker 6: people are Still they could still say, oh, well, you
Speaker 6: see you're associated with them because of a podcast where
Speaker 6: they interviewed you in twenty sixteen, But it doesn't follow
Speaker 6: from that that I'm on the same page that I
Speaker 6: agree or whatever. No, I'm talking about twenty sixteen man
Speaker 6: I'm talking way before any of this stuff. But you
Speaker 6: see what I'm saying is like you you could you
Speaker 6: I could say, well, he was on that podcast, so
Speaker 6: they worked together. Well, it would be a non sequitor
Speaker 6: because I'm telling you what was really going on was, Yeah,
Speaker 6: I went on a podcast multiple times and I explained
Speaker 6: to them this and that and I disagree, and then
Speaker 6: we just went in different directions. So there's always this
Speaker 6: and the left does this too. Everybody knows the left
Speaker 6: does this right where they say, oh, you went on whatever,
Speaker 6: so you're part of a you know, right wing whatever,
Speaker 6: fascist organization because you had a conversation with somebody on
Speaker 6: this podcast seven years ago. It's guilt by association, right. No,
Speaker 6: it wasn't David Like. I've never never I've never talked
Speaker 6: to David Ike directly. He used to link my film
Speaker 6: analysis forever. I mean, I don't even know if he
Speaker 6: was Maybe it was his web mat I don't know
Speaker 6: if it was David Ike doing it, but I'd say
Speaker 6: ten years ago, like, I would get a lot of
Speaker 6: David Ike links and I never interacted with David Ike.
Speaker 6: He would just link my analysis. So I will say,
Speaker 6: for in the case of David Ike, though now, of
Speaker 6: course it's not Sam Hide. I went on Sam Hike
Speaker 6: a few months ago. I would go I would easily
Speaker 6: go back on Sam Hi's podcast. And by the way,
Speaker 6: if you would like to see me as part of
Speaker 6: the million dollar extreme Sam Hid universe, tell Sam Hide
Speaker 6: that now I'm talking about people. He didn't have it
Speaker 6: even have a show at this time. It's about twenty sixteen, guys. Anyway,
Speaker 6: to get back to John Coleman, I agree with Richard's
Speaker 6: critique that there's definitely some leaps that are made and
Speaker 6: some claims that are not the case. But remember, just
Speaker 6: because boomer Era and the analysts kind of had that
Speaker 6: common mistake doesn't mean that we can't derive and see
Speaker 6: and appreciate what they got right. I'm not convincing. I
Speaker 6: don't think that Ordorno wrote all the Beatles song. To me,
Speaker 6: that sounds ridiculous. Could Tavistock have played a role in
Speaker 6: furthering the importation of Far Eastern ideologies into rock and
Speaker 6: roll music in the nineteen sixties in the UK. Yes,
Speaker 6: I think that's very plausible, but I don't think that
Speaker 6: we could conclude without some kind of proof. Now I
Speaker 6: read a long paper years ago that Adorno wrote about music.
Speaker 6: And an interesting thing about Adorno was, who's the fourth
Speaker 6: member of MDE. There's a a Alex Is he the
Speaker 6: fourth Schultz? Who's I think? Yeah? Tell tweet at Sam
Speaker 6: and everybody that maybe it's time to recruit. You know
Speaker 6: what I'm saying, Maybe there needs to be a recruitment process.
Speaker 6: Maybe there needs to be tryouts. What if there was
Speaker 6: a survivor style tryout. Maybe you should tell Samuel J.
Speaker 6: Heidenstein that very thing. Let's see if we can. Let's
Speaker 6: see if we can find that beautiful, beautiful Twitter account
Speaker 6: over here. By the way, if you're not following this
Speaker 6: man over here on Twitter, you should this beautiful after
Speaker 6: acentric individual, my beautiful Nubian brother, Samuel Heidenstein, you could
Speaker 6: follow him right there. Tell tell Sam hide them. Maybe
Speaker 6: maybe there needs to be a a new person, you know,
Speaker 6: saying like a new member. Anyway, let's get back to
Speaker 6: what we were talking about. Okay, enough of this, right,
Speaker 6: you guys get the point right? So yeah, we have
Speaker 6: we can appreciate doctor Coleman's books. We don't know if
Speaker 6: he really was as deep as he was into British intelligence.
Speaker 6: I can tell you that as I work through and
Speaker 6: double check the references that I found and that I
Speaker 6: can so far, I'd say he's about eighty to eighty
Speaker 6: five percent accurate so far. So I've not seen any
Speaker 6: huge mistakes that would disqualify everything that Coleman says. Maybe
Speaker 6: somebody can just debunk it. Richard did send me a
Speaker 6: video of a British colonel or general. I forget what
Speaker 6: his role was debunking. The problem was that the debunking
Speaker 6: was really just everything this guy was saying was his
Speaker 6: word against Coleman's, and a lot of the claims that
Speaker 6: he was making against Coleman were actually things that I
Speaker 6: would I could go and verify. So it's nice to
Speaker 6: actually have the HV. Dick's history of Tavistock, which actually
Speaker 6: wasn't reprinted until pretty recently. I mean, this looks like
Speaker 6: a I mean this came out in nineteen seventy. This
Speaker 6: was reprinted in twenty fifteen, so we didn't actually have
Speaker 6: like an official history of Tavistock. I don't think on
Speaker 6: that was easily accessible until about twenty fifteen when this
Speaker 6: came out. So let's get into the Tavastok book and
Speaker 6: let's look at some of the theorists and their and
Speaker 6: their claims. Now, the other thing is that we also
Speaker 6: have the Ratiau book which came out a couple of
Speaker 6: years ago that we've covered, and that also backs up
Speaker 6: a lot of the research about the Fabian society being
Speaker 6: very central to the socializing of America and the leftist takeover.
Speaker 6: And it's not divorced from what you're seeing here with
Speaker 6: the Vatican two stuff, because Coleman, for example, has an
Speaker 6: entire chapter where he argues about the history of ecumenism
Speaker 6: and as you've heard me say, and as the Rawtu
Speaker 6: book says, ecumenism was a Rockefeller Fabian socialist project to quote,
Speaker 6: permeate and penetrate the religious sphere. This began with entities
Speaker 6: like the Riverside Church that the Rockefellers put millions of
Speaker 6: dollars into. They created their own Protestant church, that is,
Speaker 6: the Protestant Church, the Evangelical made up church, as you
Speaker 6: guys remember, that has a statue of Darwin, a statue
Speaker 6: of Jesus, a statue of Hegel, a statue of Boot
Speaker 6: and Moses. Okay, literally in the giant Rockefeller they built
Speaker 6: their own Protestant cathedral, it's called Riverside Church. The idea
Speaker 6: was that the church should be converted into a soft
Speaker 6: socialist institution, not a full on, bloody Emergencis institution, but
Speaker 6: a turn the church socialist. And one of the key
Speaker 6: Council on Foreign Relation individuals who helped to push this
Speaker 6: was a famous Protestant liberal. You probably have heard of
Speaker 6: him back in the days of I haven't actually read
Speaker 6: this person because I never found that at all interesting
Speaker 6: or worthwhile to read these sort of boring liberal boomer Protestants.
Speaker 6: But one of the most famous is Reinhold Nieber, and
Speaker 6: he was a Union Theological Scenary. Now, if you don't know,
Speaker 6: Union Theological Seminary was essentially a Rockefeller created seminary. It
Speaker 6: was one of the key institutions that they created to
Speaker 6: liberalize and socialize the Protestant Church in America. The Rockefellers
Speaker 6: found it much easier to at first, through this model
Speaker 6: liberalize and socialized Protestantism because it was so kind of fragmented. Right,
Speaker 6: All you have to do is just basically put money
Speaker 6: into throw ten million dollars over here, a build a seminary,
Speaker 6: and you can control who's who's has the chair of it,
Speaker 6: you know, each department, et cetera, et cetera. And so,
Speaker 6: starting as a minister with working class sympathies, he shared
Speaker 6: with many others a commitment to you got it, pacifism
Speaker 6: and socialism. So immediately we have the Kuchianity principles here
Speaker 6: that all Kokianity principle people believe socialism and pacifism. Nieber
Speaker 6: was a promoter and a fan of the social gospel
Speaker 6: and the de indition of true, true religion again is
Speaker 6: essentially just a kind of socialism, and he ends up
Speaker 6: being a tremendous influence on a lot of the normy
Speaker 6: NPC leaders that you might expect Martin Luther King Junior,
Speaker 6: Hillary Clinton, Hubert Humphrey, Dean Atchison, Obama a bigvenn right
Speaker 6: holding my wife, Michael and right hold neighbor hold a
Speaker 6: special blaz mark. We've got Jim Jim McCaul, even Jimmy
Speaker 6: Carter right. Neiber was also influential on the right in
Speaker 6: the United States, and the Institute of Religion and Democracy
Speaker 6: was a conservative think taint that adopted his notion of
Speaker 6: quote Christian realism, in other words, social gospel that doesn't
Speaker 6: care about theology or you know, dogmatic issues or belief
Speaker 6: in the supernatural. It's just a move towards making the
Speaker 6: church a in geo basically, so you can see why
Speaker 6: this person would be promoted. And of course he serves
Speaker 6: as professor at Harvard and Princeton. These are classic OSSCA universities,
Speaker 6: and these are institutions from which we get so much
Speaker 6: of today's liberalizing and socializing tendencies amongst the Ivy League
Speaker 6: power elite. So the plan was to again turn the church,
Speaker 6: through socialization and liberation theology, into a socialist institution, and
Speaker 6: they were very successful in doing this. They started a
Speaker 6: group called the Fellowship of Faiths, and the Fellowship of
Speaker 6: Faiths was an acumenist organization committed to the unification of
Speaker 6: the world religions. In fact, they began to discuss in
Speaker 6: the late eighteen nineties, in the early nineteen hundreds, this
Speaker 6: process of unifying all the world religions through some form
Speaker 6: of ecumenism. We've covered this many times. This is pre
Speaker 6: neiber This is going back to you maybe have heard
Speaker 6: of this, but the World Parliament of Religions in eighteen
Speaker 6: ninety three. This was a conference that was put on
Speaker 6: in eighteen ninety three, and this led to a series
Speaker 6: of conferences and meetings in nineteen oh four in Paris
Speaker 6: International Congress of the History of Religions, in London in
Speaker 6: nineteen twenty four, the Living Religions of the Empire, the
Speaker 6: British Empire in nineteen thirteen, in Chicago, nineteen thirty four
Speaker 6: the Congress World Fellowship of Faiths, and many of the attendees,
Speaker 6: including many of the women that attended, were open socialists.
Speaker 6: So this was a rabid social list hive, so to speak.
Speaker 6: But not only socialists. Many people may not have been
Speaker 6: socialist at all. But this was also supported by any Bassant,
Speaker 6: the famous Fabian who talked about a ten point plan
Speaker 6: to destroy Christianity in the West and replace it with
Speaker 6: a new age, and people like Samuel Untermeyer, I think,
Speaker 6: the famous Zionist Yes and Madame Blavatsky also played a
Speaker 6: role in theosophy being used as a as a kind
Speaker 6: of placeholder or a kind of structure that might be
Speaker 6: used to unify all these world religions. So eventually the
Speaker 6: Fellowship of Faiths turns into something you may have heard of.
Speaker 6: It's called the World Council of Churches, the World Council
Speaker 6: of Churches is a heavily Rockefeller and United Nations based
Speaker 6: institute that was run at first by a guy connected
Speaker 6: with British intelligence. Then this er Hooft, if I remember
Speaker 6: his name correctly, Visert Hooft. It's like a weird Dutch guy.
Speaker 6: And money for these organizations, as we said, came from
Speaker 6: entities like the Laura Spellman Fund, the Carnegie Endowment, and
Speaker 6: the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation. And if you know, as you
Speaker 6: guys know, this is all backed up in the gigantic
Speaker 6: official history of the Rockefeller family. That's one of the
Speaker 6: key texts, the Caller and Horovitz text that I first
Speaker 6: got back in two thousand and five. And when I
Speaker 6: bought that book, I read a bunch of it, and
Speaker 6: that's when I first called into Lord Voldemort. I might
Speaker 6: I think those clips are gone, but some of you
Speaker 6: may have even heard these right where I called in
Speaker 6: at the time, and Alex said, hey, this is a
Speaker 6: really interesting information. Why don't you write an article. I
Speaker 6: wrote a long article about the Rockefeller and Cecil Roads
Speaker 6: and Rothschell families, and eventually that's my introduction to write
Speaker 6: a few articles back in the day for I n
Speaker 6: fo wars, but eventually the strategy for this movement. This
Speaker 6: eventually included things like the Bahai faith. Bahai was a
Speaker 6: huge test bed where they thought they might be able
Speaker 6: to utilize Bahai as a potential future world religion. Theosophy,
Speaker 6: as you guys know, quickly says one of the potential
Speaker 6: contenders for one of the controlled future world religion was
Speaker 6: actually Christian Science, which didn't take off, but I think
Speaker 6: it did claim a few Hollywood people. So we got
Speaker 6: Christian Science ended up getting Val Kilmer. We did. We
Speaker 6: covered this not too long. Christian Science. It was actually
Speaker 6: more Hollywood people than I expected. And Christian Science is
Speaker 6: kind of a stupid kind of mentalist mentalism cult. It's
Speaker 6: kind of dumb. But it did apparently include no this
Speaker 6: is pulling up Christian scientists. Okay, here we go. So
Speaker 6: one of the reasons why was that Nancy Astor of
Speaker 6: the Astor family was a member of the of Christian Science,
Speaker 6: and so because she was in the elite circles, she
Speaker 6: was one of the key people pushing this. That's why
Speaker 6: at the time of the Cliveden set et cetera, the
Speaker 6: Astors they thought this might be the potential future World Religion.
Speaker 6: Somebody I saw some article claiming Joan Crawford. I don't
Speaker 6: know if that's true, but we all know probably the
Speaker 6: most famous member of Christian Science today nowadays is Val Kilmer.
Speaker 6: Let's see this, This claims Carol Channing, Joan Crawford, Doris Day,
Speaker 6: Robert duvall. I didn't know that. Interesting. Allegedly allegedly, Kelsey Grammar,
Speaker 6: Howard Hawkes. That's interesting, Val Kilmer, Ginger Rogers. Interesting. So
Speaker 6: what you notice about Mary Pickford's a lot of these
Speaker 6: early old school Hollywood people. And one of the reasons
Speaker 6: that they did this, I think is similar to the
Speaker 6: model of what scientology did right where what scientology did
Speaker 6: was say, why don't we just recruit a bunch of
Speaker 6: famous people and then you know that'll dupe everybody into
Speaker 6: joining our cult. That let's the musicians, Bruce Hornsby. Well,
Speaker 6: that's a weird one. That's just the way it is.
Speaker 6: Some things will never change, oh don't you believe anyway?
Speaker 6: But I guess the saddest part of all of that
Speaker 6: is Mad Martigan. Mad Martigan, what are you doing in
Speaker 6: Christian Science? Bro? You are a hero up to all
Speaker 6: eighties children. How could you be in Christian Science.
Speaker 7: Hello, Hello, Mine Mordigan.
Speaker 6: Let's all pray that Val Kilmer leaves this horrible cult. Anyway,
Speaker 6: for those that don't know, Christian Science is just like
Speaker 6: a dumb mentalism cult where they're like they don't believe
Speaker 6: in the deed of Christ or anything. But it's like, oh,
Speaker 6: you don't need doctors. You just kind of like think
Speaker 6: and heal yourself. It's like, anyway, this didn't end up
Speaker 6: catching on, but you can see the pattern here is
Speaker 6: that they're sort of testing the waters looking for the
Speaker 6: future world religion. Will it be Theosophy, Will it be
Speaker 6: the New Age movement that birds the New Age Movement?
Speaker 6: Will it be bahaih Will it be Christian Science. What's
Speaker 6: it going to be. It's got to be something that
Speaker 6: can have like big reach, right, Or will it be
Speaker 6: the new Vatican, the monotheistic world religion Vatican that we
Speaker 6: now have with the Abu Dhabi Faith Center, Right, We
Speaker 6: get a lot of different possibilities. The Fellowship of Faiths
Speaker 6: merged with World Zionism and then the League of Nations
Speaker 6: and then the Bahai Movement emerged in England and it
Speaker 6: formed itself into the Oxford Group which was succeeded by
Speaker 6: the moral rearmament following the close of World War Two.
Speaker 6: All of these groups played a key role in the
Speaker 6: formation of the United Nations, but really these were all
Speaker 6: just socialists, loosely speaking. And so we have the ACLU,
Speaker 6: the Committee for Economic Development, the Whole House, National Council
Speaker 6: for Women, League of Industrial Democracy, Social Democrats, Social Democrats.
Speaker 6: That's actually like that overlaps with David Bentley Hart aoc RIGHT,
Speaker 6: NATO Institute for Policy Studies, Club of Rome, Cambridge Policy
Speaker 6: Study Institute, Lucia's Trust, Aspen Institute, Stanford Research, National Organization
Speaker 6: of Women, etc. He argues that all of these were
Speaker 6: essentially socialist entities that emerged at this time out of
Speaker 6: this domain of permeating and penetrating the religious sphere, and
Speaker 6: they could not have done this without large scale gigantor
Speaker 6: money support. But how do you get everybody on board
Speaker 6: with this? Because even if you're rich, you've got zillions
Speaker 6: of dollars, you can't just do whatever you want. You
Speaker 6: really got to have mass appeal and mass support. You
Speaker 6: got to have the masses on board. That's really crucial.
Speaker 6: So the way to do that is to figure out
Speaker 6: in a scientific way, all the techniques, tactics, tricks and
Speaker 6: scientific procedures of social engineering, mind control and manipulation. That's
Speaker 6: where mass media comes in to play a key role.
Speaker 6: And the early phases of mass media at the turn
Speaker 6: of the last century where the printing press books right,
Speaker 6: that was the main forms of mass media back then,
Speaker 6: and they quickly understood that they could easily control those
Speaker 6: entities without much difficulty. And so before the Tavistock Institute
Speaker 6: was set up, we have this very important entity called
Speaker 6: Wellington House. And Wellington House was the base from which
Speaker 6: the British Government why can I not spell the British
Speaker 6: Government set up its World War One propaganda bureau. So
Speaker 6: most of the early phases of the research and PayPal,
Speaker 6: wi't let me donate to stream lambs. I think you
Speaker 6: have to? Is there something going on? Is it not working?
Speaker 6: I mean I just had Hades undeads and a super
Speaker 6: chat says I don't have a father, So I'll make
Speaker 6: you mind internet dad for now. Here's ten dollars for
Speaker 6: this dad shirt dire going dad Mo. Thank you so much. Hades.
Speaker 6: You should be able to send a superchat through either
Speaker 6: PayPal or a credit card through that right there. If
Speaker 6: it's credit card, I think give to you a stripe.
Speaker 6: So but yeah, you can send a super chat right
Speaker 6: there through stream labs. It should be working because somebody
Speaker 6: just sent one. Now, Wellington House, as we know, was
Speaker 6: this early nineteen fourteen era propaganda agency where David Lloyd
Speaker 6: George Chancelled Exchequer was given the task of setting up
Speaker 6: a British war propaganda bureau together with the Liberal MP
Speaker 6: Charles Masterman. And by the way, these are fabians. Who
Speaker 6: do we have at Wellington House? Well, guess what. It's
Speaker 6: a lot of people you might expect, Sir Arthur Conan, Doyle, GK. Chess,
Speaker 6: Rudyard Kipling, H. G. Wells, Thomas Hardy. Now wait a minute,
Speaker 6: A lot of these people are fiction writers. Absolutely, of
Speaker 6: course you're gonna have a bunch of fiction writers and
Speaker 6: British spy fiction writers doing your propaganda. Who else would
Speaker 6: write propaganda? And they came up with this thing called
Speaker 6: the Reese Report r E. E. C. This is not
Speaker 6: the Recee Committee. This is that's much later on in America.
Speaker 6: The Reese Report was a made up, totally fictitious report.
Speaker 6: Excuse me, not Bryce Report, I said Reese Bryce Report
Speaker 6: b r yse of German outrages. The Kaiser is horrible,
Speaker 6: he's just butchering people. And in fact it is well
Speaker 6: known nowadays as even this talks about. These are famous
Speaker 6: into atrocities that make it an often cited example of warfare,
Speaker 6: wartime psychological warfare and propaganda. So it's just properly, it's
Speaker 6: not real. It's wartime propaganda made up at the time
Speaker 6: of World War One at Wellington House two get support
Speaker 6: first of the British people.
Speaker 5: For World War One.
Speaker 6: Now this is again in the early phase and it
Speaker 6: ends up eventually being successful because Lord Northcliffe, who was
Speaker 6: the owner of The Times and the Daily Mail, was
Speaker 6: put in charge of enemy propaganda and all of this
Speaker 6: is what is talked about in Coleman's book. This is
Speaker 6: all accurate, so that doesn't seem to be much contention
Speaker 6: about the these mainline historical accounts of Wellington House, and
Speaker 6: this becomes via Lord north Clifton and others, the entity
Speaker 6: that will morph into Tavistock. So again we're just looking
Speaker 6: at even the mainline stuff that's not even controversial but
Speaker 6: pretty much admits everything that we're talking about. Now. Tavasot
Speaker 6: really kicks off when this original Wellington House entity morphs
Speaker 6: into the World War two era Tavistock Clinic because they
Speaker 6: wanted to study shell shock. So we had soldiers coming
Speaker 6: back from World War One and they were dissociating. They
Speaker 6: had whatever PTSD ends up being right, they had, they
Speaker 6: were having these issues and so they wanted to study
Speaker 6: what was going on with these people. By the way,
Speaker 6: if you want to support my stream, you can do
Speaker 6: so right there. If you wouldn't like and share, we
Speaker 6: only got two hundred and eighty likes, seven hundred people watching.
Speaker 6: If you want to support the stream, be shred to
Speaker 6: do so through superchats as nobody celebrating their BTC gains.
Speaker 6: I mean, if you want to support me by a bitcoin,
Speaker 6: you can right here. Shout out to whoever sent one
Speaker 6: hundred dollars in bitcoin the other day. Appreciate that, very
Speaker 6: generous of you. You can support me there, or you
Speaker 6: can support via superchats. But Wellington House, as we said,
Speaker 6: was before we get to Tavistock. I wanted to mention
Speaker 6: that the after World War One, what they decided they
Speaker 6: wanted to do was focus on the nineteen thirty six
Speaker 6: book by Oswald Spengler Decline of the West. Now, Spangler
Speaker 6: wasn't writing what he thought was a He wasn't writing
Speaker 6: some conspiracy plan. Spangler is a famous historian with a
Speaker 6: kind of unique theory of history. As you guys may
Speaker 6: or may not know, that history is characterized by these
Speaker 6: world empires that have a life cycle. So you have
Speaker 6: the Babylonian era of the ancient civilization society that was
Speaker 6: characterized by a magian worldview. If you come to the
Speaker 6: modern Western civilization of European man, Spangler characterized it as faustian,
Speaker 6: meaning that that man in the West has a faustian
Speaker 6: bargain and wants to control and dominate by technology. He's
Speaker 6: not calling it even a bad thing. He's just talking
Speaker 6: about his analysis of these phases of history. He says
Speaker 6: that Western civilization has a life cycle of birth, an apex,
Speaker 6: and then a decline, and he argued that the decline
Speaker 6: would be marked by certain factors that were already kind
Speaker 6: of going on in the nineteen thirties. And Spangler, by
Speaker 6: the way, was not a fascist. I'm not sure why
Speaker 6: people call him fascist. He was very critical of Tiny
Speaker 6: Mustache Man, and Spangler is a very fascinating character. His
Speaker 6: books are fascinating. We've talked about decline to the West
Speaker 6: in the past, but one of the key things that
Speaker 6: Spangler predicted, and he was not writing this for Tavistock,
Speaker 6: had nothing to do with Tavistock. But he wrote a
Speaker 6: famous book where he said that Western Man would be
Speaker 6: his own worst enemy because eventually Western Man would allow
Speaker 6: the importations, shall we say, of large foreign populations, who
Speaker 6: would then take over his institutions and technology and subjugate
Speaker 6: and destroy Western Man if you follow me. And that's
Speaker 6: part of the thesis of Decline of the West and
Speaker 6: other books. I think he has another book too, there's
Speaker 6: a book about Prussian socialism, and then he's got a
Speaker 6: book about essentially other people taking over our technology and
Speaker 6: using it, if that makes sense. So that's kind of
Speaker 6: a ongoing thesis in Spangler. Now, the Tavistock technocrats read
Speaker 6: this and said, hey, that's a neat analysis and all,
Speaker 6: but what if we utilize that as a strategy to
Speaker 6: actually break the West and turn it into a socialist
Speaker 6: world order, which is the only hope and salvation for man. Now,
Speaker 6: this does not mean that capitalism is perfect, but this
Speaker 6: is a move from an Enlightenment revolutionary philosophy of Adam
Speaker 6: Smith's Laise fair stuff to the next phase of revolution,
Speaker 6: which is way worse in my view. And as even
Speaker 6: Spangler said, the famous quote you may have heard of it.
Speaker 6: Spangler famously said, you cannot look behind any socialist movement
Speaker 6: without finding some capitalists supporting it. In other words, if
Speaker 6: you scratch a socialist, you'll find underneath, as you peel
Speaker 6: away the layer monopoly capital support. That's a famous Spangler statement,
Speaker 6: and Spangler's absolutely correct about that, and in fact, that
Speaker 6: essentially is the modus operandi of the Fabian socialism that
Speaker 6: the Tavasak Institute had as its modus operandi, as its
Speaker 6: strategy and technique. So to all the Matt Walshes and
Speaker 6: to all the daily wi and the normy conservatives who
Speaker 6: think that there are no such things as long term
Speaker 6: conspiracies or theory or techniques of subversion and control of
Speaker 6: a society, the Tavisak Institute is the premier example of this. Admittedly,
Speaker 6: as we will see, we are not just relying on
Speaker 6: the claims of Coleman. We are going to the actual
Speaker 6: texts of the history of it and the actual people
Speaker 6: who work there with them to craft public opinion, to
Speaker 6: crystallize public opinion others. I think Lippmann has another book
Speaker 6: called The Crystallization of Public Opinion. Now, how does this work?
Speaker 6: How do they do this? Well, one of the key
Speaker 6: things they came up with was not just war propaganda
Speaker 6: and doing a lot of you know, pioneering work in
Speaker 6: that domain, and not just studying shell shock and you know,
Speaker 6: individual trauma manipulation. We're going to get to more of
Speaker 6: the specifics what are called future shocks. But they actually
Speaker 6: came up with ideas about social justice in other words,
Speaker 6: where does social justice warrior come from? Ultimately Tavistock. They
Speaker 6: also came up with ideas like mass manipulation through public polling.
Speaker 6: Now nowadays with the Internet, far fewer people care about polls,
Speaker 6: and the younger that you get, the less people care.
Speaker 6: But back in the nineteen twenties and thirties, and let's
Speaker 6: see when was public opinion wrote so Lippmann wrote public
Speaker 6: opinion in nineteen twenty. Now, Lipmann, we're talking about OSS
Speaker 6: people out of the OSS here right at that time,
Speaker 6: because people were very interested in groupthink. And by the way,
Speaker 6: the Tavistock and put several publications out about groupthink, how
Speaker 6: to engineer manufacturer group think. They understood that people wanted
Speaker 6: to be with the winning side and the group and
Speaker 6: not be an outsider. Right. That was much more normal,
Speaker 6: I guess or commonplace in the nineteen twenties, thirties, forties
Speaker 6: and fifties. Right, And so they could very easily just
Speaker 6: make up poles lie in the polls, and you could
Speaker 6: throw polling itself engineer public opinion and consent. In other words,
Speaker 6: fifty five percent of Americans support going to Wall, and
Speaker 6: then in next week it time's out out to the Atrocida.
Speaker 6: Is seventy five percent of Americans now support going to wall.
Speaker 8: And the.
Speaker 6: Grandpa man voice on the radio telling you that seventy
Speaker 6: percent of Americans support the war means that all the
Speaker 6: good Americans are going to out support the war because
Speaker 6: the fatherly grandpa voice on the radio told me that.
Speaker 6: And I don't want to be an outsider. I want
Speaker 6: to be a patriot and support my country. We got
Speaker 6: to go to war, Grandpa radio voice told me, got
Speaker 6: to go to war? Literally? Is that like that simple?
Speaker 6: I mean, yeah, it's a whole book, but like the
Speaker 6: basis of principle, is that just lie through statistics, lie
Speaker 6: through polls. The polls don't even have to be real.
Speaker 6: I mean, who in the nineteen fifties was going to
Speaker 6: go check to see if the polls were real? Nobody?
Speaker 6: People weren't. People were probably, I think, much more deferring
Speaker 6: to authority at the time, and so they could get
Speaker 6: away with a lot more back in these days as
Speaker 6: they were making breakthroughs in social engineering and the public
Speaker 6: had not caught on to any of this. Again, remember
Speaker 6: the very first page of Burns's Propaganda, and Bernez is
Speaker 6: one of these people working with these people. Remember we've
Speaker 6: lectured through the entirety of Brenz's book many years ago, Propaganda,
Speaker 6: And on the very first page, brene says, you think
Speaker 6: you live in the democratic society where you make choices,
Speaker 6: But all of your choices are given to you, and
Speaker 6: your choices are manufactured for you, and your desires are
Speaker 6: given to you and are controlled by an elite of
Speaker 6: whom you've never heard and you don't know anything about. Now.
Speaker 6: I don't think that Brene's was directly talking about the
Speaker 6: quote illuminati. He's talking about the Tavistock Institute, the social
Speaker 6: scientists and social engineers, working at Tavistock, people from the
Speaker 6: Frankfurt School to pioneer psychological manipulation through advertising, public campaigns, polling, etc.
Speaker 6: That's what he's talking about. He's talking about people like
Speaker 6: Don Draper in Madmen as just one example. I'm not
Speaker 6: saying Don Draper runs the illuminati, know what I'm saying.
Speaker 6: Hopefully this we had a high IQ audience, right. Remember
Speaker 6: Bill Gates was seen in that famous picture a few
Speaker 6: years ago with the book How to Lie Through Statistics.
Speaker 6: So this is a very well known, precise science. This
Speaker 6: is not wack adoodle quack adoodle made up tenfold stuff.
Speaker 6: This is all very easily verifiable. Walter Lippmann and Tavistock,
Speaker 6: for example, came up with with Burnet's a term that
Speaker 6: would help the Woodrow Wilson administration that convinced the American
Speaker 6: population to be involved in the European foreign conflicts. Remember,
Speaker 6: the founding fathers had an established attitude in America that
Speaker 6: we would not be involved in European foreign conflicts. This
Speaker 6: was weaponized when Wellington House and Tabs came up with
Speaker 6: the idea of isolationism. Isolationism became a derogatory term when
Speaker 6: prior to that was any think derogatory. It's just that's
Speaker 6: the American attitude. It's America first, that was the attitude,
Speaker 6: that was the model. But these people came up with
Speaker 6: a very cunning strategy to attack and to demonize people
Speaker 6: who would be America first. I'm talking about back in
Speaker 6: the nineteen thirties, forties, et cetera, by saying that they
Speaker 6: were callous, didn't care about the human rights in other countries,
Speaker 6: they were insensitive to atrocities, et cetera, et cetera, all
Speaker 6: the stuff that they had tested out in World War
Speaker 6: One with attacking the Kaiser, the posters about the hunt H. G.
Speaker 6: Wells's propaganda posters that he came up with that we've
Speaker 6: covered in the past. And so social justice mans that
Speaker 6: America take action and be involved in these campaigns. In fact,
Speaker 6: the United States will champion and lead the charge according
Speaker 6: to the Fabians in this just world order that they
Speaker 6: want to establish. I'm not joking, that's from them. Tavastak
Speaker 6: came up with the idea that in order for this
Speaker 6: to be successful, we would need a long term plan
Speaker 6: of what are called future shocks. These would be shocks
Speaker 6: and tests to the system. This is not dead. By
Speaker 6: the way, if you remember, I think even Klaus was
Speaker 6: speaking this way not too long ago. Z And if
Speaker 6: you listen to enough of these people and their lectures
Speaker 6: and their talks, you'll hear them use this terminology quite often,
Speaker 6: right shocks to the system, future shocks. In fact, one
Speaker 6: of the global elite themselves, Alvin Toffler, wrote a whole
Speaker 6: book called Future Shock that's Tavistock ideology. The idea was
Speaker 6: that certain crisis, big scale crisis events, shock events are
Speaker 6: the things that can propel this ideology in this game
Speaker 6: plan forward large scale crises. That's why every almost every
Speaker 6: global elite text that we lectured through many of them,
Speaker 6: as you guys know, how do they always begin We
Speaker 6: are in a crisis crisis christ They always begin the
Speaker 6: same way. Whether it's Brazenski, whether it's Freethoff Copra, whether
Speaker 6: it's HG. Wells, whether it's Charles Galton Darwin. The books
Speaker 6: begin with we are in a crisis, human population, nukes,
Speaker 6: blah blah blah. One of the things that they tested
Speaker 6: out at Wellington House that was very effective in terms
Speaker 6: of propaganda was get this to call the Kaiser the
Speaker 6: Butcher of Berlin the Beast of the East come up.
Speaker 6: They come up with these wild sort of almost like
Speaker 6: like Trump tweets right, like sleepy Joe, right like the uh.
Speaker 6: And And what's funny is that Coleman argues, and I
Speaker 6: don't doubt this that when the United States wanted to
Speaker 6: go after Saddam, they literally just copied and pasted everything
Speaker 6: that that Wellington House had done with the Kaiser. And
Speaker 6: guess what what do we see nowadays with all the
Speaker 6: same types of propaganda. Asad is Hitler. Putin is Hitler, Hitler, Hitler.
Speaker 6: Every look, Bob Woodward, Putin is the Hitler of our century.
Speaker 6: Asad is Hitler. Like are you noticing a pattern? Like
Speaker 6: so all you do is just slap the person that
Speaker 6: you want to go after up with a Heatler, Right,
Speaker 6: this is a just endless left tactic. They never get old,
Speaker 6: they never get they never get tired to this. And
Speaker 6: I mean, I don't care who you are, if you're
Speaker 6: not a leftist by default, you're tiny mustache man. Asad
Speaker 6: regime Assad is using is worse than Heatler. Assad is
Speaker 6: using chemical weapons. Guess what that was all fake? You
Speaker 6: remember when they admitted that Assad was not using chemical weapons?
Speaker 6: On his own people. That was all made up. Oh
Speaker 6: are you noticing a pattern here? The atrocities, the atrocities
Speaker 6: against their own people, the butcher of Baghdad, Saddam Hussein.
Speaker 6: And this works on the dumbed down, normy audience. Let's
Speaker 6: see if we can find any old propaganda about Saddam.
Speaker 6: Saddam Hussein is worse than Hitler. Saddam is Hitler. So
Speaker 6: as you can see, Uh, this is a like literally
Speaker 6: the lowest tier of propaganda, and they still use this.
Speaker 6: It's kind of it's kind of wild, like they've never
Speaker 6: they've never stopped using this. It never stops, and eventually
Speaker 6: it becomes this It doesn't even have to make any sense.
Speaker 6: Anyone who is not Mao is Hitler. You see, that's
Speaker 6: the logic of the left here. And you could only
Speaker 6: get to this kind of a situation with the long
Speaker 6: term in depth brainwashing and social engineering that the Tavislak
Speaker 6: Institute pioneer. Now other key members of the Tavislak Institute,
Speaker 6: they utilize the Halford mckinder Heartland Rimland theory to be
Speaker 6: the kind of guide for the Royal Institute for International
Speaker 6: Affairs and the London University and London School of Economics.
Speaker 6: In fact, we must have a world state to bring
Speaker 6: in this world order is itself a phrase from Toynbee.
Speaker 6: So Toynbee, the famous Fabian socialist British intellig I think
Speaker 6: it was Verish intelligence, wasn't he. Historian and philosopher Old
Speaker 6: Toynbee is one of the key figures working at Wellington,
Speaker 6: and I think at Tavistock. So if you're looking for
Speaker 6: key operators and thinkers and movers, Toynbee is definitely up
Speaker 6: there with H. G. Wells and all these other characters
Speaker 6: that we mentioned.
Speaker 11: H G.
Speaker 6: Wells's book The Open Conspiracy is a key text that
Speaker 6: outlines the Tavistock Institute's plans. This is not for those
Speaker 6: that don't know, and we've actually through this book for
Speaker 6: many many years, over and over and over. This is
Speaker 6: not a conspiracy book, you understand. This is a book
Speaker 6: from the very people we're talking about, and it is
Speaker 6: an admitted plan and strategy from a Fabian socialist working
Speaker 6: with all of the people that we're talking about, right Ah,
Speaker 6: she Wells. And the reason he calls it an open
Speaker 6: conspiracy is that he says that we don't have to
Speaker 6: hide this, there's no there's no need to make this
Speaker 6: some kind of a secret thing. It's just simply reality
Speaker 6: and it doesn't have to be hidden. Of course, my
Speaker 6: my talk on this that never comes up even though wait,
Speaker 6: no does it here? Here we go? Oh, it comes
Speaker 6: up on some other person's channel and not my channel
Speaker 6: of course. So this is really frustrating because you know,
Speaker 6: so many of my talks are buried. You can't find
Speaker 6: half of these anymore. Here we go. Amazingly, this one
Speaker 6: comes up, so I think, yeah, so here is the
Speaker 6: original talk. This was almost eight years ago. So we've
Speaker 6: been talking about this book for eight years. This is
Speaker 6: a half and half talk or partial talk. Now he
Speaker 6: has another book that's equally as important, and well, actually
Speaker 6: there's more than one god the Invisible King that Jamie
Speaker 6: and I covered as another as she Wells book about
Speaker 6: the coming world religion, and he has where's the other one?
Speaker 6: It's called a New World Order. That one might be buried. No,
Speaker 6: it's not. Amazingly, so here's me back when I had
Speaker 6: Carba Bloat with a mustache. This is seven years ago.
Speaker 5: HG.
Speaker 6: Wells's book. Now again, I don't know why anybody at
Speaker 6: this stage could or would think that what we're talking
Speaker 6: about doesn't exist and is made up and is crazy talk,
Speaker 6: when the actual most famous authors and writers of the
Speaker 6: last century, we're part of the Fabian society working with Tavistock,
Speaker 6: admittedly saying they want a nWo, admittedly talking about all
Speaker 6: the stuff in their books, and then you insist it
Speaker 6: doesn't exist, it's made up, and you're crazy. I'm not
Speaker 6: talking about aliens, I'm not talking about Tartaria. I'm talking
Speaker 6: about verifiable public information in books that really should settle
Speaker 6: like there should be no debate, given the fact that
Speaker 6: these are real texts and these people really are who
Speaker 6: they say they are. But I would venture that I
Speaker 6: would say, what do you think Ninety to ninety five
Speaker 6: percent of the people who are awake have never heard
Speaker 6: of these books, never read these books, don't know what
Speaker 6: any of these things are about. Even though we've been
Speaker 6: talking about this for almost ten years. The books are
Speaker 6: not conspiracy books.
Speaker 8: HG.
Speaker 6: Wells was a high level freemason by admission atheist, socialist
Speaker 6: technocrat who wants to depopulate in the family, have a
Speaker 6: completely controlled, technocratic one world order and what's in Brave
Speaker 6: New World. In nineteen eighty four is what they want explicitly,
Speaker 6: end of debate. There is no debate about this. If
Speaker 6: you're debating this at this point, this is your problem.
Speaker 6: This is a U problem. So so far in the
Speaker 6: Tavistot book, it looks like we're on the right track.
Speaker 6: So far, We've got good information. And one little diddy
Speaker 6: that I was surprised to see at the beginning of
Speaker 6: the book was that because the UK was so envious
Speaker 6: and hateful towards Germany, they were really looking for at
Speaker 6: this Wellington House phase any ways, and means to destroy
Speaker 6: and bring down Germany as a competitor to the Anglo
Speaker 6: American establishment. And so they saw the need first informosts,
Speaker 6: as we said, to control the newspapers, not just control
Speaker 6: the newspapers, but to control education.
Speaker 11: And to.
Speaker 6: Essentially engineer the public through public polling and consent to
Speaker 6: flip them to be pro war, not just in the UK,
Speaker 6: but also eventually in the West and the United States. Now,
Speaker 6: if you heard my lectures that we did in My
Speaker 6: Life Talks, you know we went into detail about Colonel
Speaker 6: Edwin mandel House and President Woodrow Wilson. Did you know
Speaker 6: that the fourteen points was actually adopted from a Fabian
Speaker 6: socialist book. The fourteen Points was the part of the
Speaker 6: Fabian socialist model for a socialist world. Now, they didn't
Speaker 6: get all of this at World War One and with
Speaker 6: the League of Nations. The League of Nations ended up
Speaker 6: being a failure, even though Colonel Edwin mandel House and
Speaker 6: other Fabian socialist operatives working for Ralph Child were really
Speaker 6: pushing to alter America and bring it back under quote
Speaker 6: British Empire. Now, when people hear this, it doesn't mean
Speaker 6: like the classical British Empire of you know, seventeen hundreds. No, no, no,
Speaker 6: we're talking about a world federalist, socialist empire. That is
Speaker 6: the model that John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes had. Okay,
Speaker 6: So they realized with the waning of the British Empire
Speaker 6: and with the rise of America and American Revolution all that,
Speaker 6: et cetera, that they were not going to be able
Speaker 6: to rebuild the British Empire as it had been in
Speaker 6: its so called glory days. And so when you have
Speaker 6: that early phase of Roads and Ruskin and people, they
Speaker 6: were talking about the white Anglo Saxon man through evolution
Speaker 6: being destined to dominate the planet. Okay, that's true, that
Speaker 6: is accurate. They did say that, and they had a
Speaker 6: Darwinian Malthusian worldview even then, and it was connected to
Speaker 6: the idea of the specific Anglo Saxon breed and stock
Speaker 6: of people. However, this changes as we begin to have
Speaker 6: the assent of the Fabian socialist model, which agrees with
Speaker 6: a lot of what the prior model had, but they
Speaker 6: do not share anything to do with anything pro white man.
Speaker 6: The Fabian socialst model says, no, no, it's not going
Speaker 6: to be a race or breed of people. That is
Speaker 6: the future. We're going to select specific elite members of
Speaker 6: any group, it doesn't matter. They will be the leaders
Speaker 6: of the future. They have to be atheistic, technocratic, et cetera,
Speaker 6: et cetera. That's why George Bernard Shaw on the the
Speaker 6: future people in the movement I'm talking about, has a
Speaker 6: famous quote where he says, when we get the technocratic
Speaker 6: order in place, you'll have to come to us, the
Speaker 6: priests class technocrats, and you'll have to convince us why
Speaker 6: we should let you live, because we have a mandate
Speaker 6: for the good of the survival the human race to
Speaker 6: mass dpop literally and he says. So remember this flips
Speaker 6: in terms of attitude from Ruskin Rhodes time away from
Speaker 6: quote Anglo saxon Man dominance to anti human attitude, only
Speaker 6: socialist technocrat dominance. They get rid of all of the
Speaker 6: race elements. This is partly why tiny mustache Man is
Speaker 6: part of the dialectical system that they want to destroy.
Speaker 6: I'm not saying tiny mustache Man was good. I'm saying
Speaker 6: that that was an older model that these people had discarded.
Speaker 6: And in fact, if you read the Rawtu book, the
Speaker 6: The Fabian Socialist, whether it's eventually Bertrand Russell the webs,
Speaker 6: I forget he mentions. I know Bernard Shaw says it,
Speaker 6: but some of the other keys they actually say that, no, no,
Speaker 6: this model is wrong. In order to get advancement for
Speaker 6: the socialist order, we will actually have to destroy honky Man.
Speaker 6: You catch my drift. So this attitude changes, and that
Speaker 6: attitude continues into the model of Tavistock and the technocrats.
Speaker 6: That is what dominates still to this day. For example,
Speaker 6: General Wesley Clark famously said Europe will have to be destroyed.
Speaker 6: I'm not saying that General Wesley Clark had some criticisms
Speaker 6: of the neocons. Okay, wow, great, that's great. There's a
Speaker 6: seven nations plank. Yeah, wow, that's true. That's great. Yeah,
Speaker 6: but he also is a proponent ultimately of this technocratic,
Speaker 6: fabian socialist agenda. Thank you, guys for those super chats.
Speaker 6: Appreciate that. Thank you so much, AC for that big
Speaker 6: fat super chat. Of course, it looks like AC is
Speaker 6: gonna win. But hey, maybe you guys can top him,
Speaker 6: or you can equal it out. I know a lot
Speaker 6: of people had some BTC celebrations today. We did hit
Speaker 6: at h a minute ago. Did we pull back a
Speaker 6: little bit for we're all waiting for we're hovering around
Speaker 6: ninety two five, okay, okay, okay, okay, we're all waiting
Speaker 6: for things to pop off, to hit one hundred k. Anyway,
Speaker 6: and as you may understand, you probably are aware. Yes,
Speaker 6: it is precisely this era of wood Wilson, Colonel Awamandel
Speaker 6: House where we get the Federal Reserve, absolutely and we
Speaker 6: begin to get Marxist ideas such as the income text.
Speaker 6: And if you doubt that, are you not familiar with
Speaker 6: the planks of the Communist Manifesto. One of them is
Speaker 6: the Fiat Central Bank abolition of the family inheritance tax.
Speaker 6: Here it is the planks of the communist manifesto at
Speaker 6: is very beginning. Thank you with that. I appreciate that. Now,
Speaker 6: remember do not misunderstand what I'm saying here. What guy
Speaker 6: is wildly wrong? I'm wrong? You want to come on
Speaker 6: in debate where I'm wrong. I'm literally at Marxist dot org.
Speaker 6: Abolition of private property, a heavy and progressive income tax,
Speaker 6: abolition of inheritance. These are planks of the communist manifesto.
Speaker 6: Free education in public schools, Communist manifesto. So you can
Speaker 6: see some examples. Centralization of bank and credit in the
Speaker 6: hands of the state. Guess what. Ultimately that's the private
Speaker 6: federal reserve. You see who's I'm wrong or who's wrong?
Speaker 6: I want that? Got to come to bate me. I mean,
Speaker 6: we're looking at the this is the Marxist communist manifesto.
Speaker 6: Now we're not fighting classical Marxists, because the Fabians are
Speaker 6: reformed Marxists who wanted to align a softer socialism with
Speaker 6: monopoly capital. So, in other words, a liberal economic elite
Speaker 6: was much more effective than these hardcore extreme policies that
Speaker 6: marx wanted right away through the proletari rising up and
Speaker 6: bloody revolution is seasing the means of production. That didn't happen.
Speaker 6: It's not going to happen. And so the Fabian said,
Speaker 6: we want a gradual, slow kill model using money.
Speaker 5: And even HG.
Speaker 6: Wells, if you guys remember I don't remember if it's
Speaker 6: it's either his New World Order book or up in Conspiracy,
Speaker 6: where HG. Well says to Marxist of his day, he says,
Speaker 6: you Marxists are stupid, He said, do you not realize
Speaker 6: that the only way the nWo will be built is
Speaker 6: through capital? He says that, don't worry. Let the capitalist
Speaker 6: elite build the infrastructure of a global order. We will
Speaker 6: then take it over. Not in a one day bloody
Speaker 6: revolution where the factory workers stop printing the funkal pops
Speaker 6: and they rise up and kill the CEO. No, We're
Speaker 6: going to wait until they build it, and we will
Speaker 6: gradually through permeation and penetration, the long march to the institutions.
Speaker 6: As Graham she said, we'll take it over and our
Speaker 6: allies will be And here's the big secret. Have always
Speaker 6: been big capital. Remember Spangler was correct when he said
Speaker 6: you can never search scratch below the surface of a
Speaker 6: socialist movement without finding mega capital behind it. This is
Speaker 6: the thing that we can never get across to the
Speaker 6: Norman Conservatives. Normy conservatives cannot understand this. They will not
Speaker 6: understand this. This is one of the roadblocks to anything
Speaker 6: actually ever changing. In order for things to actually ever change,
Speaker 6: we have to get the right to understand these points
Speaker 6: that it is not just the boobs in Washington, the
Speaker 6: idiots in Washington, doom booms and Joe Biden's it's not
Speaker 6: idiocy that's importing millions of people. It's a strategy. And
Speaker 6: by the way Coleman said in the nineteen nineties, that's
Speaker 6: exactly what they would do. Large scale importation, change the demographics,
Speaker 6: boom with a gigantic underclass, easily turn this nation into
Speaker 6: a socialist country. It's not a rocket science. It's pretty obvious.
Speaker 6: A gigantic dependent underclass that's imported on the teet of
Speaker 6: the Nanty state makes the whole country eventually socialist by design.
Speaker 6: It is not just boobs in Washington. And why can
Speaker 6: we not get the right to understand this? Why is
Speaker 6: this so difficult? It's like, it's so obvious if you
Speaker 6: actually read the actual people. Arnold Toynbee wrote, I already
Speaker 6: took down the Toynbee so now I got to get
Speaker 6: this book because this book sounds crazy. Toynbee says, quote,
Speaker 6: if we are to avoid mass unliving, he means self
Speaker 6: that humanity will destroy itself. We must have a world state. Now.
Speaker 6: It must not have a democratic form to begin with.
Speaker 6: We must build the world state. Now. That is one
Speaker 6: of the most important ideologues of the last century. Arnold
Speaker 6: Toynbee himself. I have his was It History? There's a C.
Speaker 6: Wells's Outlines of History, and then Toynbe has another offic
Speaker 6: Toynbee's book. But one of the key figures that we're
Speaker 6: talking about here in the British socialist empire saying we
Speaker 6: must have this. Thus, with the advent of Wellington House
Speaker 6: that was funded originally by the British monarchy and later
Speaker 6: by Rockefeller in Rothshaw, we would begin to have the institute,
Speaker 6: the think tank that would be the seed for which
Speaker 6: the world would be converted into a world socialist order.
Speaker 6: And to get back to the character of Bruce Lockhart,
Speaker 6: we are speaking of this famous British operative because I'll
Speaker 6: mention just this brief section that he talks about, and
Speaker 6: again this is actually correct because I have his memoirs.
Speaker 6: This is corroborated. We often hear of what Sutton talked
Speaker 6: about right in Wall Street of the Bullstreet Revolution about
Speaker 6: the support. Now, apparently I haven't checked this because I've
Speaker 6: never read Churchill and I'm not a Churchill. I think
Speaker 6: Churchill was a stewoge essentially of the same people. But
Speaker 6: apparently Churchill at what point said I gotta figure out
Speaker 6: where this is. Maybe this is in his He does
Speaker 6: mention a Churchill book at the end. I've never read Churchill,
Speaker 6: so I don't know which one it.
Speaker 8: Is, but.
Speaker 6: He mentions Winston Churchill's book. I don't remember which one.
Speaker 6: I don't see it. But anyway, Churchill apparently says the
Speaker 6: transportation of Lenin Vladimir Lenin in a sealed truck like
Speaker 6: a plague vasilis from Switzerland into Russia established Lenin and
Speaker 6: Trotsky enabled them to seize Russia by the hair of
Speaker 6: its head. So Churchill was actually admitting and alluding to
Speaker 6: the importation of Lenin and Trotsky secretly into Russia via
Speaker 6: this train, and that they had a bunch of gold
Speaker 6: given to them, millions of dollars in the sealed trainer
Speaker 6: truck transport of Lenin and his Bolshevik revolutionaries into the
Speaker 6: midst of from war turn Europe into Russia to deposit
Speaker 6: them to import their revolution, which was not the Russian Revolution,
Speaker 6: but was actually exported to Russia when I was privileged
Speaker 6: to actually study at Wellington House.
Speaker 11: This is.
Speaker 6: Coleman's claim. I was reading through Arnold Toynbee's papers, I
Speaker 6: found then Bruce Lockhart's private papers, which led me to
Speaker 6: the conclusion that without Toynbee, Bruce Lockhart and British intelligence,
Speaker 6: and without the complicity of at least five European nations,
Speaker 6: the Romanov's would not have fallen to the Bolsheviks. And
Speaker 6: by the way, Sutton says the exact same thing in
Speaker 6: his chapter on David Lloyd, George Lord Milner and Lord
Speaker 6: Milner using Bruce Lockhart as the go between to the Bolsheviks.
Speaker 6: This account must of necessity be limited to Tavistock's participation
Speaker 6: in this affair. It will not be a complete account
Speaker 6: of the skullduggery because, according to Milner's private papers, Lord
Speaker 6: Milner his aids through Tavistock were contacted through a fellow
Speaker 6: named Fritz Plattin Fritz Platten was a famous socialist. Milner
Speaker 6: was a leading Fabian, and although he eventually ended up
Speaker 6: scorning Sydney and Beatrice web, they were all still working
Speaker 6: on the same team. It was Fritz Platten who planned
Speaker 6: the logistics of the trip that oversaw the arrival of
Speaker 6: the revolutionaries to Petrograd. This was confirmed and borne out
Speaker 6: by the vinnaim Strasse files of which I was able
Speaker 6: to gain access. These files were open to certain people
Speaker 6: allowed to read them. They tallied very closely with Bruce
Speaker 6: Lockhart's account in his private papers, as well as what
Speaker 6: I was able to read from Lord Elli, Alfred Milner
Speaker 6: and the Betrayal of Russia. Now I remember Sutton says
Speaker 6: the exact same thing in his book on this, naming
Speaker 6: all the same people in the exact same account. It
Speaker 6: appears that Milner had many contacts amongst the Bolsheviks in
Speaker 6: addition to Lennon. In fact, it was to Lord Milner
Speaker 6: that Lennon went when he needed money for the revolution.
Speaker 6: Arned with a letter of introduction from Fritz Platten, Lennon
Speaker 6: met with Lord Milner and laid down his plan for
Speaker 6: the overthrow of the Romanovs and Christian Russia. Eventually, to
Speaker 6: seal the deal, Milner agreed on condition that he could
Speaker 6: send his agent, Bruce Lockhart of I six to oversee
Speaker 6: and supervise day to day affairs and how Lennon was
Speaker 6: handling the job. Lord Ralphchild and the Rockefellers demanded that
Speaker 6: they be allowed to send Sidney Riley. Sidney Riley, did
Speaker 6: you hear what I said? All of this seems to
Speaker 6: line up with all the other research and stuff that
Speaker 6: I've talked about, and I am looking forward actually to
Speaker 6: reading doctor Richard Spence's book on Sidney Riley. Now I
Speaker 6: have a mainstream normy book on Sidney Riley, but I
Speaker 6: guarantee you that doctor Spencer's book is going to have
Speaker 6: the actual details. In other words, if you really want
Speaker 6: to understand the last century and what all was going down,
Speaker 6: you got to read Quigley's text in Toto. You have
Speaker 6: to read the raw Tu book, and you have to
Speaker 6: go into these famous spies. You've got to go into
Speaker 6: the Bruce Lockheart memoirs. And although I've not rap read
Speaker 6: some of those, haven't read the whole thing yet. You
Speaker 6: have to go through these rare texts like Trust No.
Speaker 6: One The Secret World of Sidney Riley by doctor Richard
Speaker 6: Spence whom we've interviewed. Sam Richard Spence that wrote the
Speaker 6: book Secret Agents sixty sixty six about Crowley. Now did
Speaker 6: you catch that Coleman accurately here mentions Ralph Child and
Speaker 6: the rock Fillers demanded that they be allowed to send
Speaker 6: Sidney Riley to also supervise the transfer of Russia's natural
Speaker 6: resources and the gold that were held in the Central
Speaker 6: Bank of Moscow. Lennon agreed to this, allegedly, and then
Speaker 6: Trotsky as well. To seal the bargain. Lord Milner, on
Speaker 6: the behalf of Ralph, gave Lennon sixty million pounds of gold.
Speaker 6: The Rockefellers then contributed forty million pounds of gold. Countries
Speaker 6: in complicity with this and the sealed train of affair
Speaker 6: were Great Britain, Germany and Finland, Switzerland and Sweden. US, however,
Speaker 6: was not directly involved at this time. However, at the
Speaker 6: orders of President Wilson. It was This is where you
Speaker 6: get Wilson granting a a passport through Fritz Plottin through
Speaker 6: German espionage operatives to Trotsky. The Wilhemstrassa files confirmed that
Speaker 6: the carriage was remained locked. No one was able to
Speaker 6: board the carriage without Fritz Plottin's permission. The train would
Speaker 6: have extra territorial status. Passports were not to be checked,
Speaker 6: tickets would be bought at regular prices, there would be
Speaker 6: no security issues. And if you remember, Sutton has a
Speaker 6: whole chapter where he talks about the Wilson administration getting
Speaker 6: Trotsky or Lenin or Trotsky their their files and passports
Speaker 6: so that they could do all this. So one hundred
Speaker 6: million dollars in gold was the price of the bullshit revolution.
Speaker 6: Now why would they want that? Well, if you remember,
Speaker 6: the revolution in Russia was actually run out of one
Speaker 6: of the basically a block of New York that the
Speaker 6: Rockefellers owned, And we've detailed this the whole The Sutton
Speaker 6: book covers the entire history what each department and building
Speaker 6: of that Rockefeller complex was doing. They're literally running the
Speaker 6: Russian Revolution out of this building you see, out of
Speaker 6: New York. So it's run out of New York. A
Speaker 6: lot of different individuals, entities, corporations, people, family banks contribute.
Speaker 6: And why do they do this because Russia has some
Speaker 6: of the most valuable resources on the planet. And this
Speaker 6: was the creation of a whole new capital market. If
Speaker 6: the revolution is successful, if there's a destruction of Russia,
Speaker 6: and if the Western capitalist elites are supporting the revolution,
Speaker 6: then Western companies and corporations who are bought into this
Speaker 6: pay to play can come in and loot the place.
Speaker 6: It's not that sophisticated. It's fancy with all these fronts
Speaker 6: and shells and this and that is just causing a
Speaker 6: disturbance and looting a country. That's all it is. And
Speaker 6: that's really what modern warfare is, destroying and looting and
Speaker 6: then rebuilding and making the people that you conquered pay
Speaker 6: for it. It's not that sophisticated. It's literally just warfare
Speaker 6: and subterfuse to take shit. That's it at its most
Speaker 6: basic level. Now, to get back to Tavistok, Tavasak had
Speaker 6: not only pioneered studies. Now remember they got their start
Speaker 6: through a gigantic grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockfeller
Speaker 6: Foundation's giant grant is the significant money that facilitated the
Speaker 6: creation of what we know of as Tavistock. Now, remember,
Speaker 6: at this time, it's just Tavistock Clinic, which becomes Tavistack Institute.
Speaker 6: This expands to be a multi tiered facility places all
Speaker 6: over the UK, and it eventually becomes the spearhead of
Speaker 6: you Got It trn Z movement in fact, the last
Speaker 6: ten years. If you're wondering where all this came from,
Speaker 6: do you think it just popped out of nowhere? Suddenly
Speaker 6: Bruce Gender is on the cover of Sports Illustrator or
Speaker 6: does anybody read Sports Illustrator even know that exists? But
Speaker 6: Woman of the Year Bruce Gender? What where does this
Speaker 6: come from? Do you think that it just all sprang
Speaker 6: out of nowhere? No, it's not one damn thing after another.
Speaker 6: A lot of things are strategized and planned far more
Speaker 6: than what the normy conservatives think. We don't even consider.
Speaker 6: The normy liberals are not even they're out to lunch.
Speaker 6: They don't even they can't think. The normy conservatives can
Speaker 6: at least think. But they're so arrogant and delusional and
Speaker 6: prideful that they cannot admit that evil strategizes and plans.
Speaker 6: I don't understand how they. I mean, every normally conservative will.
Speaker 12: Have these fetishes about I love to study, you know,
Speaker 12: I love to study the techniques and tactics of D
Speaker 12: Day and Normandy and the invasion, and to twenty three
Speaker 12: thousand tanks at this day, the forty three thousand troops.
Speaker 6: Were over here. They all the stupid shit about things
Speaker 6: of specifics of World War two, but they can't figure
Speaker 6: out that strategizing happens at a bigger level than a war.
Speaker 5: Did.
Speaker 6: The strategy in the aspionage just quit after the war.
Speaker 6: And yet the mainstream media has said for seven years
Speaker 6: that Russia has conspired for many, many years to subvert
Speaker 6: our elections and to control our country. And all I
Speaker 6: saw today on Twitter in the Norman I looked, I
Speaker 6: looked briefly at the Normy sphere. Do you know what
Speaker 6: they're all saying, literally all saying, Tulsi Gabbard is a
Speaker 6: Russian agent. She was cultivated by Russia, just like no evidence.
Speaker 6: They just say, because she doesn't want to continue the policies,
Speaker 6: she's a Russian operative, an agent. It's just ridiculous. No,
Speaker 6: Norman Conservatives, not every thing is planned, we don't go
Speaker 6: full Skitzo. But far more is planned than what you think.
Speaker 6: And it's precisely the reality of large scale espionage. Let's
Speaker 6: call it you want to call it espionage? Is that
Speaker 6: better for you? Is that more acceptable to you? Because publicly,
Speaker 6: according to mainstream media, the spearhead of the TRA and
Speaker 6: Z movement for the last decade or more has been Tavastok.
Speaker 6: They had the largest clinic in the world. About this,
Speaker 6: do you think it's accidental that it's all the same
Speaker 6: goblins I'm talking about that are behind this clinic. I mean,
Speaker 6: it's like in your face, dummies, What is wrong with you?
Speaker 6: What is the major malfunction to where you can't see
Speaker 6: this when it's right in your face? Admitted in mainstream news.
Speaker 6: In fact, it was so egregiousous, as Jack Sparrow says
Speaker 6: that two years ago they had to shut all this
Speaker 6: stuff down because they were just openly trying to brainwash
Speaker 6: youths into snipping off peepees. I mean, it would take
Speaker 6: you two seconds to look up on the internet the
Speaker 6: hub of t R A n Z stuff from the establishment.
Speaker 6: It happens to be Tavasak. Hello, you can't figure this out? Well,
Speaker 6: mconomic consup doesn't exist. I don't want to be a
Speaker 6: turnfoil hut. It literally takes you two seconds to look
Speaker 6: up Tavistock gender, The foremost clinic in the world had
Speaker 6: to shut down over this. Now I wonder where and
Speaker 6: how they came up. Why would the Tavasak Institute be
Speaker 6: involved in this? Hmm hmm. What does this go along with?
Speaker 6: Are there any other ideologies that this links up with,
Speaker 6: like depopulation like that kind of stuff.
Speaker 10: So so far.
Speaker 6: We've seen Coleman, even when he's making speculations or claims
Speaker 6: that we can't exactly verify, he's pretty much so far
Speaker 6: doing good like he's I'd say he's eighty percent pretty
Speaker 6: much right. So far, we haven't seen anything that's totally
Speaker 6: hard to believe or whatever. And he points out that
Speaker 6: one of the things that they studied early on Tavistock
Speaker 6: in the nineteen twenties, I guess it was still Wellington
Speaker 6: House or whatever. Let's see what year is Tavistock forty seven.
Speaker 6: Tavastok Clinic becomes Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in nineteen
Speaker 6: forty seven, So the clinic becomes this more of a
Speaker 6: think tank at this point, And how does it become
Speaker 6: so powerful? Well, not just Rockefeller, but you'll notice, according
Speaker 6: to the public record, giant corporations begin to be interested
Speaker 6: in their research. We have a meta bad manufacturing shell Bayer,
Speaker 6: Glacier Metals, Una Lever, the National Coal Board start contracting
Speaker 6: and utilizing research from the Tavasak Institute. So you understand
Speaker 6: this is growing into a corporate level entity that is
Speaker 6: used or consulted or contracted out to do research. So
Speaker 6: maybe shell Shell Oil says hey Tavastock, we want to
Speaker 6: create a much broader consensus and community amongst our customers.
Speaker 6: What are the techniques of groupthink and cult behavior literally
Speaker 6: that we might utilize to create that for our market share?
Speaker 6: And Tavastok says, let us go to work on that
Speaker 6: for you. You see the CIA, says Tavastock. We want
Speaker 6: to study PTSD in soldiers coming back. I don't know,
Speaker 6: I'm just speculating and throwing out things that are probably
Speaker 6: the case. We want to study PTSD and soldiers that
Speaker 6: came back from Iraq. Ah. Yes, we'll do that. We
Speaker 6: have decades of research on PTSD. Us, let us do
Speaker 6: that for you. So this is what we're talking about.
Speaker 6: Corporations entities say we want to create a new market
Speaker 6: for example of here's one for you. And I'm just
Speaker 6: throwing this out, but I guarantee something like this happened.
Speaker 6: Let's say you're what's the big makeup companies, Cephora or Mabelene,
Speaker 6: I don't know, whatever makeup companies are. Makeup company says,
Speaker 6: how do we create a new market? Well, right now,
Speaker 6: half of the population uses makeup, the women. What if
Speaker 6: we can sell the idea that the other half of
Speaker 6: the population it's cool and trendy and gender affirming and safe.
Speaker 6: It's a safe space for dudes to wear makeup. And
Speaker 6: Jeffrey Charlls is promoted to the top of everything for years.
Speaker 6: Why is he Why because there's a vested interest that
Speaker 6: certain companies have. We're just talking about the money level.
Speaker 6: We're not talking about the big social ends, just the
Speaker 6: money level. Okay, wouldn't Sephora do well if the other
Speaker 6: half of the population potentially now is going to start
Speaker 6: wearing makeup on a large scale? Of course, and that's
Speaker 6: exactly what they did. The large makeup companies literally start
Speaker 6: putting men in their ads wearing makeup tr n Z stuff.
Speaker 6: So just at the money level, normally is out to
Speaker 6: be able to figure that out, even though they can't.
Speaker 6: But beyond the money level, there's a deeper agenda at
Speaker 6: work exactly exactly, dudes at Sephora full on dressed like ladies. Exactly.
Speaker 6: What was study? Here's the thing. What was studied is
Speaker 6: something I told you about a few streams ago in
Speaker 6: the nineteen twenties was the Many sex revolution in the
Speaker 6: nineteen twenties. Did you know in the nineteen twenties there
Speaker 6: was a mini sex revolution. Now, and you might think this,
Speaker 6: this is not for this time. This was a huge deal.
Speaker 6: So in the roaring twenties there was this Many sex revolution, which,
Speaker 6: by the way, Tavistock promoted and was studying and wanted.
Speaker 6: There was a many free love thing going on in
Speaker 6: the nineteen twenties. The women started moving their dresses up
Speaker 6: and so to have and show your leg an inch
Speaker 6: or two above the knee was like scandalous, right, So
Speaker 6: this image right here, this kind of stuff, and this
Speaker 6: was in a lot of the movies at the time,
Speaker 6: and not like that. To drink alcohol this is I
Speaker 6: didn't actually realize that until I was reading this book.
Speaker 6: In the nineteen twenties, women drinking alcohol in public was
Speaker 6: seen as scandalous. Now, I mean, just like the stuff
Speaker 6: that we think is scandalous is like nothing compared to
Speaker 6: what the nineteen twenties thought was scandalis now. I'm not saying,
Speaker 6: by the way, that we have to go back to
Speaker 6: the nineteen twenties or we I mean, I think some
Speaker 6: of this is a little bit ridiculous. But wherever on
Speaker 6: the scale or the spectrum you think it is, like
Speaker 6: in terms of ridiculousness, I don't think it's that big
Speaker 6: of a deal of a woman has a drink in public.
Speaker 6: That's kind of ridiculous to me. And a skirt being
Speaker 6: an inch above the knee, I mean, come on, But
Speaker 6: for the time, that was seen as revolutionary, you see. So,
Speaker 6: regardless of what the actual right standard is, if you
Speaker 6: think about it in terms of social engineering, these people
Speaker 6: are studying how this works and how this affects people
Speaker 6: at that time for or where they want to take
Speaker 6: the revolution in the future, you see. So the little
Speaker 6: revolutions are being studied to push the envelope in the
Speaker 6: next ten to twenty thirty forty years. That's the way
Speaker 6: by design. Explicitly, the Fabian socialists, we're thinking this is
Speaker 6: also and I haven't proven this, but I'm pretty sure
Speaker 6: this is where the it girl comes from. So I
Speaker 6: think the first it girl was Clara Bow, right, and
Speaker 6: they realized back at this time, let's see, yeah, we
Speaker 6: could control society, not just through this goofy you know
Speaker 6: news stuff where the newsman comes on it. So a
Speaker 6: Shanta a Mark, I'm support the wall. That's time to
Speaker 6: go to the wall, Bolly, and then everybody wants to
Speaker 6: go to war. Well, much more effective than Grandpa Radio
Speaker 6: voice would be the babes of the time, like Clara Bo.
Speaker 6: If Clara Bow bobs her hair and smokes cigarettes and
Speaker 6: bops around and whatever she does in her little flapper stuff,
Speaker 6: that's way more effective for social engineering because now all
Speaker 6: the girls want to be like Clara Bo. The social
Speaker 6: engineering of the star. You see the celebrity of the star.
Speaker 6: And then all the girls are suddenly acting and dressing
Speaker 6: like Clara Bow. And this is so powerful, especially for women.
Speaker 6: It's kind of crazy, right, and they're not going to
Speaker 6: pick ugly people. You had Clara Bow and then Joan Crawford,
Speaker 6: who becomes basically one of the most iconic, hugest Hollywood
Speaker 6: women of all time. Right, she follows suit. She becomes
Speaker 6: the it girl. She's icon of Hollywood and all kinds
Speaker 6: of crazy stuff for the next several decades. And I mean,
Speaker 6: I have to admit, she is very talented actress. I'm
Speaker 6: not hating on Joan Crawford. I think she's pretty just
Speaker 6: from a talent standpoint, like she's pretty, pretty wild just
Speaker 6: as an actress. But the social engineering is pretty much
Speaker 6: next level. You also get this with what's her face.
Speaker 6: I can't stand Betty Davis. I can't stand Betty Davis.
Speaker 6: Her movie Suck Too seem like one good Betty Davis movie,
Speaker 6: same situation. She's also it girl at the time, flapper,
Speaker 6: all this kind of stuff back in the early twenties thirties,
Speaker 6: and I think, by the way, she became a witch
Speaker 6: for her daughter. I think, so she became a witch,
Speaker 6: which is crazy, not surprising. But my point is that, Okay,
Speaker 6: so even in the nineteen tens twenties, with these early
Speaker 6: it girls, they are being studied for the manufacturing and
Speaker 6: engineering of social revolution. And he argues that, oh, by
Speaker 6: the way, this is also prior to the Hayes Code.
Speaker 6: You guys remember this. So if you watch, for example,
Speaker 6: a movie like Rain with Joe Crawford, which is one
Speaker 6: of the it's one of the most famous early I
Speaker 6: think it's her most famous early film. This is really
Speaker 6: scandalous because in the movie in nineteen thirty two, she
Speaker 6: plays a prostitute on an island who has these long
Speaker 6: arguments with this Puritan minister and it's really like the
Speaker 6: film is like degraded quality, but it's a very famous,
Speaker 6: you know, old school Hollywood thirties film. This was really
Speaker 6: edgy for the time. But the weird part was that
Speaker 6: this is right prior to the Hayes Code, so they
Speaker 6: could actually almost do pretty much rate I would say
Speaker 6: rated R stuff and maybe even a little bit of
Speaker 6: nudity at this time in movies especially. This was right
Speaker 6: after silent pictures, so this is like the beginning of
Speaker 6: the talkies. But then the Hayes Code comes in, and
Speaker 6: the Hayes Code was intended to counteract this kind of
Speaker 6: stuff in the movies, and I think the Hayes Code
Speaker 6: was largely promoted by Catholics. It was in effect from
Speaker 6: nineteen thirty four to nineteen sixty eight. So notice that
Speaker 6: date nineteen sixty eight, right in the middle of the
Speaker 6: sixties unterercultural sexual revolution. You get the removal the Hayze Code.
Speaker 6: And I mean, look, it was definitely better under the
Speaker 6: Hayze Code. But I mean there's some really ridiculous stuff,
Speaker 6: like the Haze Code would like you couldn't have a
Speaker 6: kiss on screen. It's like what And like if you
Speaker 6: had a bedroom you had to portray this is where
Speaker 6: we get the two beds, right, two beds. That's kind
Speaker 6: of weird. So, I mean it was it was a
Speaker 6: little too far on the Puritan side, but way definitely
Speaker 6: in the right direction of today rare Catholic win exactly.
Speaker 6: I mean definitely we rather have the Haze Code than
Speaker 6: like Rocky Horror or any of this kind of garbage. Yes,
Speaker 6: rare Catholic win there. But point being is that they
Speaker 6: were studying, according to Coleman, and I think it's probably correct,
Speaker 6: the sex elements of the Silent era film stars, and
Speaker 6: this was before the Hayes Code. And this is when
Speaker 6: they could get away with a lot more. By the way,
Speaker 6: if you've seen the movie Babylon with Mario, Robbie and
Speaker 6: Brad Pitt, was actually a really good movie about the
Speaker 6: history of Hollywood. The beginning of the movie when they're
Speaker 6: doing the silent pictures is pre Hayes Code, and that's
Speaker 6: why you see them doing all this kind of crazy stuff,
Speaker 6: because you're like, how could they do this crazy stuff
Speaker 6: in the nineteen tens and twenties, Well, that's because they
Speaker 6: didn't have laws about this yet. Now moving on to
Speaker 6: the key characters of the phase of Tavistock proper, when
Speaker 6: we get these research units and they start setting up
Speaker 6: units that deal with all kinds of stuff. All the
Speaker 6: way up until today, the units are for example, it
Speaker 6: says human resources, so I would venture that human resources
Speaker 6: itself probably comes out of Tavistock. Just the whole idea
Speaker 6: of human resources is probably a Tavistock invention, Human Resource Center,
Speaker 6: Center for Applied Social Research, Institute for Operational Research, British
Speaker 6: Operational Research Society. Now a lot of this sounds really boring,
Speaker 6: but what they're doing is literally giving corporations the structure
Speaker 6: that corporations have. So for example, when you go to
Speaker 6: a company and they have an HR manager and it's
Speaker 6: some big, old fat bitch who's talking to you about
Speaker 6: you being a racist, that's from Tabstat. When you go
Speaker 6: to the grocery store and there's a employee of the month,
Speaker 6: that's from Tavistock. The military they contract to Tavistock how
Speaker 6: can we get our special forces units to have more
Speaker 6: group think and less independent action. Tavistock, all of this,
Speaker 6: it's all tabasas. Now, keep in mind this also kind
Speaker 6: of bursts the bubble of the libertarian versus government dialectic
Speaker 6: because Tavistock is one in percent united with the corporations
Speaker 6: and they're one in percent united with the British government
Speaker 6: the US government. So there's no either or here. This
Speaker 6: is a public private type of entity what Coleman calls,
Speaker 6: I think correctly, the world's foremost brainwashing entity. So who
Speaker 6: are some of the key figures? Some of these you
Speaker 6: probably heard of, some of the most important outstanding figures
Speaker 6: of the earlier phase this or I guess you say
Speaker 6: middle phase of Tavistock when we're getting getting into the
Speaker 6: nineteen forties, fifties, sixties. Many of them are mentioned here.
Speaker 6: Let's see he mentions doctor Kurt Lewin, who is also
Speaker 6: Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School overlap Major General John Rawlings Rees.
Speaker 6: Whenever we did this previous talk which I can't find
Speaker 6: on or what it is, we covered John Rawlings reees
Speaker 6: extensively HV. Dix And who is HV.
Speaker 5: Dix?
Speaker 6: Well, he just happens to be the author of the
Speaker 6: official academic History of Tavistock. W. R. Bayon, who has
Speaker 6: countless tabstock public publications. Margaret Meade, Margaret me the famous
Speaker 6: fraudster woman, wife of doctor Gregory Bateson of m k
Speaker 6: Ultra fame. So notice now we're having overlap with mk
Speaker 6: Ultra through doctor Gregory Bateson, Margaret Mead, the famous noble
Speaker 6: savage person. Remember did you know?
Speaker 7: Do you?
Speaker 6: Are you aware that it turns out that Margaret Meade
Speaker 6: was a fraud. She was faking stuff, her research on
Speaker 6: Indigenous peoples and all that. It was all just gibberish.
Speaker 6: It's all fake, noble savage, all this stuff that Margaret
Speaker 6: me was pushing, that was all blunt. Well, she's out
Speaker 6: of Tavistank and her husband, Gregory Bateson, is out of Tavistok.
Speaker 6: But these are the same people who go on, as
Speaker 6: we said, to create Michigan University's Institute for Social Research.
Speaker 6: And what do we get from the ISR Critical studies
Speaker 6: critical theory Critical race theory.
Speaker 13: Critical race theory is an academic field focused on the
Speaker 13: relationships between.
Speaker 6: Shut up, Siri, hush, I didn't ask you anything Okay,
Speaker 6: you see this giant, menacing Soviet looking concrete block entity
Speaker 6: that we covered the other night. Institute for Social Research,
Speaker 6: Why yes, it is everything evil and as menacing as
Speaker 6: you would expect. And we looked up the year history
Speaker 6: anniversary interview with the ISR. Now, remember this is at
Speaker 6: the university level, and this is university goblins pushing all
Speaker 6: their university stuff, which is usually where the goblins are.
Speaker 6: The Frankfurt School and the Tavasak Institute. They permeate and
Speaker 6: penetrate institutions, including academia. And this goes on to talk about, oh, yes,
Speaker 6: we were set up to push things like Adorno's Frankfurt
Speaker 6: School critical theory and that leads to critical race theory.
Speaker 6: So when you hear all this stuff about critical this,
Speaker 6: critical that, and they're talking about hobbor Ma, yes, Horkheimer, Adorno,
Speaker 6: all the Frankfurt School people, Hollar Moss Institute for Social Research,
Speaker 6: and why were these people important? This is just a
Speaker 6: recap a little bit of what we talked about last time.
Speaker 6: Because who aligned themselves with the Frankfurt School, the CIA
Speaker 6: and its predecessor, the OSS. Is that a conspiracy theory?
Speaker 6: No Bertrand Russell talked about it openly. In fact, we
Speaker 6: found this academic guys gigantor there's almost a book.
Speaker 1: Is this it?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 3: This isn't it?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 7: This is it?
Speaker 6: Let's see, No, that's not it. There's another guy wrote
Speaker 6: like a massive book length level thing on this that
Speaker 6: we looked at the other night. But regardless, we'll just
Speaker 6: go to straight from the mouth of the establishment Foreign
Speaker 6: Affairs magazine reporting on a book that was published. I
Speaker 6: should get this book, by the way, the Frankfurt School
Speaker 6: at War, the Marxists who helped explain the Nazis to
Speaker 6: the OSS, to the CIA, Franz Neumann, Herbert marcusa Otto
Speaker 6: Kerkheimer War makes for strange bedfellows. Among the oddest peering
Speaker 6: is the World War two production that was the bringing
Speaker 6: together of while Bill Donovan, the head of the OSS,
Speaker 6: precursor of the CIA, and the German Jewish Marxists that
Speaker 6: helped the United States understand and combat tiny mustache Man,
Speaker 6: the OSS and CIA together with the frank For School. Okay,
Speaker 6: so all these academics have nothing to do with conspiracies.
Speaker 6: It's all academic literature. Now briefly here before we get
Speaker 6: into the Tavistock studies of what they call three system
Speaker 6: response to stress. Three system response to stress. I wanted
Speaker 6: to look through the official history of Tavistock according to
Speaker 6: one of its Tavistock luminaries HV. Dix, and we're gonna
Speaker 6: just look and see who all is referenced as being
Speaker 6: directly connected to and having a relationship with Tavistock officially.
Speaker 6: Maybe Coleman is making all this up. It's maybe it's
Speaker 6: not true. Now, remember this book was printed in nineteen
Speaker 6: seventy but was obscure and was reprinted in twenty fifteen,
Speaker 6: so it was really difficult to check up on a
Speaker 6: lot of this material unless you had access to a
Speaker 6: large library with a lot of research material, or you
Speaker 6: could find this book prior to nineteen fifteen. But as
Speaker 6: we go through the text, we find that the Carnegies
Speaker 6: are mentioned in play a very important role. So the
Speaker 6: Carnegie Endowment that has a direct connection the British government
Speaker 6: absolutely has a direct, important connection to Tavistock. The famous
Speaker 6: genetics I think it is a geneticist Hans isinc And
Speaker 6: he's famous because I think he lost an award recently
Speaker 6: because he is a eugenicist. German British psychologist Hans Isinc.
Speaker 6: He's a famous he won some award, I'm trying to
Speaker 6: remember it, and they took it back because someone found
Speaker 6: some place where he was talking about racism. And so
Speaker 6: even if you're in the establishment and you push the
Speaker 6: establishment positions are the controversial, Hans isainc and guess what
Speaker 6: he says that so can you can you guess what
Speaker 6: he says it's so controversial. Now I'm not saying he's
Speaker 6: a good person, but he dared to say that there's
Speaker 6: a correlation between various ethnic groups and IQ. There you go,
Speaker 6: that's it. That's enough to get you losing your rewards
Speaker 6: from the establishment nowadays. Anyway, Hans Isaac had a key
Speaker 6: role connected to Tom Sock, the Josiah Macy and the
Speaker 6: Macy Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Ford Funishment, the World
Speaker 6: Health Organization. Rudolph hes Interesting. Why would Rudolph hes be
Speaker 6: related to tough Well, Tabostock actually was very interested in
Speaker 6: the propaganda of Hesse and the tiny mustache men entities.
Speaker 6: They don't believe the story of tiny mustache men and
Speaker 6: the propaganda, but they're interested in the techniques. That's why
Speaker 6: studies about hypnotism Oh, interesting, the Institute of Child Psychology.
Speaker 6: Institute of Child Psychology. Oh you mean, yeah, to push
Speaker 6: gender affirming care. You see the history of IQ and
Speaker 6: intelligence studies. Now, I'm not saying that all IQ intelligent
Speaker 6: studies are wrong, but that information can be studied and
Speaker 6: used for various purposes. Carl Jung, did you know Carl
Speaker 6: Jung had a deep important connection to Tavistock And if
Speaker 6: you remember, Carl Jung was a member of what intelligence agency?
Speaker 6: He's agent four eight eight. Yes, Carl Jung was a
Speaker 6: member of the OSS and he reported and his documents
Speaker 6: are public where he him and Alan Dallas. So what
Speaker 6: I'm trying to say, their communicators back and forth are public.
Speaker 6: And so No, Carl Jung was not a a lot
Speaker 6: of people thought Carl Jung works for a tiny mustache
Speaker 6: man because he talks about archetyps. No, he was in
Speaker 6: direct contact with Alan Dallas and worked for the OSS.
Speaker 6: He even had a name agent for eighty eight Kurt
Speaker 6: Lewin of the Frankfort School, the London School of Economics
Speaker 6: Marital studies. Interesting. What are some of the courses and
Speaker 6: lectures at Tavistot Child Psychology Understanding clergy, medical practitioners, magistrates,
Speaker 6: marital studies, studying the public, social workers, studying statistics, trade unions,
Speaker 6: war neuroses, studying teachers. So you can see that they're
Speaker 6: interested in all areas of society. Edward Mappither, Now that's it.
Speaker 6: The only reason that name caught my attention, Edward Mappither,
Speaker 6: is because do you know what famous celebrity is named Mapither?
Speaker 6: That is a quiz question for the audience, Royal College
Speaker 6: of Psychiatrists. Edward Mappither. I'm just playing around right now,
Speaker 6: just checking out. Wouldn't it be funny?
Speaker 1: Ah?
Speaker 6: So he studied shell shock for them, and guess what,
Speaker 6: Not only was I a member of the Eugenics Society,
Speaker 6: and not only did he provide a Bobo's for women,
Speaker 6: he was also skittles as basically, all these people are what. Yes,
Speaker 6: our famous celebrity named Mappither is Tom kun Let's see,
Speaker 6: is this guy related to Tom Cruise. Tom Cruise's real
Speaker 6: name is William Mappither. I think he's like William Mappither
Speaker 6: the third. That's it the way, that's his brother, that's
Speaker 6: the cousin. Tom Cruise's name is Thomas Cruise Mappither the fourth,
Speaker 6: So he's he's from a long line of Mapithers. I'll say,
Speaker 6: so his cousin is this dude never, I don't know
Speaker 6: who that is anyway, I don't know if he's related
Speaker 6: to that British dude. I was just screwing around. What
Speaker 6: else comes up in key areas? Uh, this is just
Speaker 6: I'm just doing a survey here of elements that overlap
Speaker 6: with the history of personality assessment studies. And by the way,
Speaker 6: the person assessment studies, if you don't know, they're actually
Speaker 6: part of m k ULTRA. So a lot of these
Speaker 6: studies and research is also, by the way, directly part
Speaker 6: of m k LDRUP, the personality assessment system. I think
Speaker 6: that I found an old journal, a journalistic entry in
Speaker 6: a magazine written by John Marx that wrote the m
Speaker 6: Kiltra book. He has a separate piece that he wrote
Speaker 6: in the nineteen eighties about the history of the personality
Speaker 6: assessment and that's actually connected to studies that Abraham Maslow
Speaker 6: did for mk ULTRA. Very few people know that, but
Speaker 6: the reason that they wanted these personality studies. It's right.
Speaker 6: So when people start telling you, I'm in, I am
Speaker 6: I n F I'm an I MTJ, I'm a TMI,
Speaker 6: I'm an opp whatever whatever all those that's actually from
Speaker 6: m Kltrup. So next time somebody trusts to classify you
Speaker 6: say you can't classify me with your gay ultra stuff.
Speaker 6: I don't fit your category. Bro, I ain't in no category.
Speaker 6: I know I n T i't a know TNA. I'm
Speaker 6: in a TNA category. Psychoanalysis, Jungian psychoanalysis, Freudian psychoanalysis, public
Speaker 6: relations studied at a very large level, John Rowlings Reeve's
Speaker 6: key character, key figure, working groups, group therapy, group studies, groupthink, psychosomatics, studies,
Speaker 6: sex abuse in kid studies, social psychiaty, so every just
Speaker 6: studying every kind of social domain you could even think of,
Speaker 6: shell Shock, Sigmund Freud, Royal Society, Rockefeller Foundation, Eric trist Unesco,
Speaker 6: World Health Organization. So, according to the mainline history of
Speaker 6: Tavistock by Tavistock member HV. Dix, one of the key
Speaker 6: figures and characters so far, pretty much every major character, entity, organization,
Speaker 6: idea has been studied is part of Tavistock and is correct.
Speaker 6: Doesn't mean everything that Coleman says is correct. He might
Speaker 6: be speculating in areas and going a little too far
Speaker 6: here and there. But again I'm gonna say so far
Speaker 6: we're about eighty percent accurate. I think that's a fair level.
Speaker 6: And again, I've read all the Wells books that we're
Speaker 6: talking about. I've read the Burnet's propaganda texts, and that
Speaker 6: all lines up exactly with what he claims. So let's
Speaker 6: see next up. Okay, we covered all that. We covered
Speaker 6: the Bolsheviks, Sidney Riley, Bruce Lockhart, we covered all that.
Speaker 6: Tavistock basically is the prior instantiation of also something akin
Speaker 6: to the Rand Corporation. Now, if you don't know about
Speaker 6: Rand Corporation, I've done a lecture on the official History
Speaker 6: of Rand Corporation by Alex Abaya, and Rent Corporation is
Speaker 6: very similar to I'm sure many of the same people
Speaker 6: from Tavistock also have worked at Rand and vice versa,
Speaker 6: so a lot of these things, it's similar stuff. If
Speaker 6: you would like to watch my mini doc that I
Speaker 6: made six years ago on Rand, you can watch it
Speaker 6: right there. But I think I have a separate talk,
Speaker 6: or maybe this mini doc is the talk. I don't remember.
Speaker 6: I've done so many of these things for so many years.
Speaker 6: We got a talk we hear with Burmas. So I
Speaker 6: did a whole breakdown with Burmas of the Rand Corporation
Speaker 6: book by alex Obeya. And I did that because if
Speaker 6: you remember, back in the day Lord Voldemort, I did
Speaker 6: a sit down, linky interview with alex Obeya. You could
Speaker 6: probably find them a rumble or something. But alex Obeya
Speaker 6: went pretty deep in the book in terms of what
Speaker 6: he admits. I'm sure it wasn't everything because it was
Speaker 6: an official history of Rand Corporation by alex Obeya. But
Speaker 6: I did read the whole book and we did lecture
Speaker 6: through it. It is considered one of our globally texts
Speaker 6: because it is an official from the Rand Corporation allowing
Speaker 6: alex Obeya in to.
Speaker 11: Do it.
Speaker 6: The book is called Soldiers of Reason. This is an
Speaker 6: interview with alex Obea after he had written the book
Speaker 6: and published it. Here's other people talking about how Rain
Speaker 6: Corporation created the American strategy. Basically, it's the brains behind
Speaker 6: the Cold War, it's the brains behind Obamacare, It's the
Speaker 6: brains behind how they transition America into a service economy
Speaker 6: out of an industrial economy. That's all admitted in the book,
Speaker 6: Rank Corporation came up with how to sell war Desert Storm.
Speaker 6: They came up with the idea to live film and
Speaker 6: live stream the Gulf War, which was one of the
Speaker 6: first times that had been done. It had been the
Speaker 6: first videoed war was Vietnam, but the first live cast
Speaker 6: was I think the first Desert Storm. That's all covered
Speaker 6: in the book. Let's see a little bit of clip
Speaker 6: of this.
Speaker 11: I'm the author of Soldiers of Reason, Corporation and the
Speaker 11: Rights of the American Empire. The Rank Corporation is the
Speaker 11: most important thing tank in the history of the world,
Speaker 11: and its scientists and its theories have changed the way that.
Speaker 6: We look at the world and the way I think
Speaker 6: Rank Corporation is definitely out. They're probably equal to I
Speaker 6: think Aba Tavastok and RAND are probably equal in regards
Speaker 6: to global think tank importance and prowess, that.
Speaker 11: War a fault, and even the way that we live
Speaker 11: today and stands for research and development. Of course, the
Speaker 11: joke always say is that there is no development. It's
Speaker 11: always been just research. Rand has no political affiliation. It's
Speaker 11: not democratic, it's not republican, it's pro government. It's part
Speaker 11: of the what some people are called the permanent government
Speaker 11: of the United States, and it's been so since nineteen
Speaker 11: forty eight when it was incorporated. It doesn't matter what
Speaker 11: administration is in power, they will always turn to.
Speaker 5: Rand to do.
Speaker 6: This is essentially the brain trust, the thinking behind the
Speaker 6: deep state. So this is the You could look at
Speaker 6: this as not so much of the money side of
Speaker 6: the deep state or the bureaucracy side of the deep state.
Speaker 6: This is the brains of the deep state.
Speaker 11: Studies later sentences would be a Dan Rumsfeld who went
Speaker 11: from being chairman of the board of the Rank Corporation
Speaker 11: to being Secretary of Defense. It starts in nineteen forty
Speaker 11: six as the military equivalent in peacetime of the Manhattan Project.
Speaker 11: On The Manhattan Project, as you recall, was the combination
Speaker 11: of civilian scientists and industry power, and the army and
Speaker 11: the Air Force together combined, they gave us the atomic
Speaker 11: bomb at menace in Eastern Europe, especially the development of
Speaker 11: nuclear weapons and how to cite nuclear weapons, and also
Speaker 11: how to counter the threat post by the Soviet Union.
Speaker 6: In other words, the Rank Corporation is really the brains
Speaker 6: behind the entire Cold War. The Rand Corporation manufactured, propped up, promoted, agitated,
Speaker 6: and advocated and sold the Cold War. That's really where
Speaker 6: they come into to focus. Now, Tavistock we were talking
Speaker 6: about at the time of World War Two. So Rand
Speaker 6: is not on the on the doesn't exist yet. Rand
Speaker 6: is like what Curtis Curtis LeMay, it comes to being
Speaker 6: out of the Air Force right, kind of at the
Speaker 6: beginning of the Cold War, if I remember, right. So
Speaker 6: we're not at the point of rancorporation yet in terms
Speaker 6: of where we are with Tavistock, but it is very
Speaker 6: important to bring up Rand because it's kind of America's
Speaker 6: version of Tavistock, so to speak. Now, Tavistock tends to
Speaker 6: focus more on maybe issues of social science and control.
Speaker 6: Rand Corporation has a much more of a tech minded bent, right,
Speaker 6: So there's a lot of engineering studies, text studies going
Speaker 6: on at RAN. For example, you may be familiar with
Speaker 6: the idea of deep underground military bases that comes out
Speaker 6: of Rand Corporation. Literally a lot of those older Rand
Speaker 6: Corporation papers are declassified. For example, Rand put out in
Speaker 6: the ninth I think in the nineteen fifties or sixties
Speaker 6: or seventies, like how to construct giant underground tunnel systems,
Speaker 6: this kind of stuff. Rank Corporation puts out studies how
Speaker 6: to sell the American public on Obamacare. Literally, like the
Speaker 6: Obamacare comes out of RAND Corporation studies. So this is
Speaker 6: really the brains of the military industrial complex. Is the
Speaker 6: way to think about RAN Corporation. Tavistok is the UK
Speaker 6: version concerned with mainly social engineering and social control, but
Speaker 6: there are a lot of overlaps between these two entities
Speaker 6: are very similar and probably many of this same people.
Speaker 11: So the past sixty years, actually RAND has been at
Speaker 11: the center, at the forefront of the major changes that
Speaker 11: have occurred in the in US government and that have
Speaker 11: occurred in US science. RAND wasn't only just important to
Speaker 11: Iraq and to the Middle East. They're also important to terrorism.
Speaker 11: Matter of fact, they created the feel of the terrorism studies,
Speaker 11: the revolution and military affairs, the transformation of the nation's
Speaker 11: armed forces.
Speaker 6: That was directly did you hear that the whole field
Speaker 6: of terror studies comes out of RAND? And who were
Speaker 6: many of the early founders of RAND Neo conservative Trotzkyites
Speaker 6: Albert Wolfstetter.
Speaker 11: By Donald Rumsfeldt actually came about from plants that have
Speaker 11: been gestated by.
Speaker 6: Rand Oh interesting or like Big nine type studies that
Speaker 6: are you romsfell Big nine, rand Rumsfeld's at rand terror studies,
Speaker 6: rumsfell right there during Big nine.
Speaker 11: Are people who have been affiliated with rants.
Speaker 7: You know, they have physicists and they have economists, and.
Speaker 11: They have sociologists, and so you have both the heart
Speaker 11: sciences and the soft sciences.
Speaker 6: So they have continued with that.
Speaker 11: At this point. Fifty percent of the budget comes from
Speaker 11: the federal government and the other fifty percent for private
Speaker 11: contractors TENUS.
Speaker 6: People, public private partnership, just like Tavistock. So this has
Speaker 6: nothing to do with the fake debate of the libertarians
Speaker 6: versus the big government. By the way, if you want
Speaker 6: to watch the rest of that, you can watch it
Speaker 6: there and again I've I don't remember what I titled it,
Speaker 6: but for my members section, I mean six years ago
Speaker 6: we lectured through his entire book, So you can go
Speaker 6: read that the member section. You'd also try to dig
Speaker 6: up the old Lord Voldemart Alexabeya interviews somewhere from probably
Speaker 6: that was probably twenty ten, two thousand and nine. It's
Speaker 6: probably when that happened. I wonder just for fun sake,
Speaker 6: let's see if we could find I remember so, by
Speaker 6: the way, if you want the Internet as it was
Speaker 6: in like twenty fourteen, you do yandex, right, which is
Speaker 6: like a Russian search engine. So let's see, because I
Speaker 6: guarantee it'll pull up somewhere on yandex here it is.
Speaker 6: What do you know? And one thing I've noticed about
Speaker 6: yandex which is interesting is that so this is not
Speaker 6: the full interview. That full interview is right there the
Speaker 6: rest of the hour. Here's old classic Voldemort from twenty ten.
Speaker 6: What's interesting about index is that have you noticed when
Speaker 6: it pulls up stuff from like YouTube? It's pulling up
Speaker 6: videos that are not hidden, like they're still there, but
Speaker 6: YouTube no longer pulls up these videos. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 6: I mean, I don't know what all is going on
Speaker 6: or how it works. But for example, this is a
Speaker 6: video from twenty ten that is still on YouTube. But
Speaker 6: I guarantee you, like you're not gonna be able to
Speaker 6: pull that up from YouTube's search engine.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 6: So here is the this is still on YouTube from
Speaker 6: twenty eleven and the rise of the American input.
Speaker 5: Getting that.
Speaker 6: Here is a sit down interview that Lord V did
Speaker 6: in twenty eleven. It's still on YouTube. See that, there's
Speaker 6: the one I was talking about right there. So anyway,
Speaker 6: if you want the Internet as it was in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 6: you have to use yendex, Y A, and DX. That's
Speaker 6: everything I've looked for that I remember, Oh, where's that
Speaker 6: interview from twenty ten? Where's that article from twenty ten?
Speaker 6: I can usually find it on yendex. So it's basically
Speaker 6: what Google was in twenty ten. Who do you think
Speaker 6: I'm talking about? Who did? I literally just play? All right,
Speaker 6: let's rate a couple of super chats here, we got
Speaker 6: thirty four jd N says Quantum Tavistock. Yeah, baby, that's
Speaker 6: what I'm talking about. He's Mike em sends three dollars
Speaker 6: and doesn't say anything but thank you so much, Mike
Speaker 6: m Elon's Omega chip. Thank you. Excuse me? I think
Speaker 6: that was a c FO yo. Panky blank diamond ring
Speaker 6: is on my panky pankey gotta we gotta. I gotta
Speaker 6: immediately go out and take all of my I'm gonna
Speaker 6: take all of my BTC profits. I'm gonna cash out
Speaker 6: right now. I'm gonna buy the giantesst diamond ring, panky
Speaker 6: panky and cotton candy with all of my BTC right now. Literally,
Speaker 6: that's what I'm doing. Cash out, baby and have fun.
Speaker 6: By the way, we're only uh halfway through, so this
Speaker 6: is a half talk for the public. If you would
Speaker 6: like access to this full talk the rest of Tavistock.
Speaker 6: As we work our way through, we'll see how many
Speaker 6: more pages we got of information. We get one, two, three,
Speaker 6: four eee yikes, I got nine more pages of notes,
Speaker 6: so we got quite a bit more. Maybe I have
Speaker 6: to make this a couple talks, but thank you so much,
Speaker 6: AC five dollars. If they believe in evolution and dialectics,
Speaker 6: what does that mean that some of them are fine
Speaker 6: with tiny mustache Man fascism and that proves strong enough
Speaker 6: to beat their fabianism. Wouldn't it just be the strongest evolution.
Speaker 6: I think that the inner core knows that tiny mustache
Speaker 6: Man was also supported by the same people. That's what
Speaker 6: is referred to as the inner Party. So when when
Speaker 6: he's writing nineteen eighty four, remember and he's he's describing
Speaker 6: the Inner Party according to the way that O'Brien tells
Speaker 6: him about it, right, the Inner Party is the only
Speaker 6: group that knows what's going on, and they know that
Speaker 6: it's a dialective because the whole book is about the
Speaker 6: manufacturer controlled dialectics, right, That's a big part of it.
Speaker 6: Because remember, the villain Emmanuel Goldstein is fake. He's a
Speaker 6: created entity, a fabled enemy that the O'Brien and the
Speaker 6: Inner Party control, because the O'Brien and the Inner Party
Speaker 6: run the revolution against Big Brother, control opposition. So I
Speaker 6: think the Inner Party of people like a Bredard Shaw
Speaker 6: was probably an Inner Party person. I think they understood
Speaker 6: that tiny mustache man could only go so far as
Speaker 6: he was built up to go. And this is my speculation,
Speaker 6: but probably modern enemies of the West like Iran are
Speaker 6: in a similar area where they're really kind of on
Speaker 6: a leash and they're kind of a contained opponent, and
Speaker 6: there's not they're not really a threat to the West
Speaker 6: or even to the Middle East, but it's helpful to
Speaker 6: have them there as a perpetual, eternal excuse. And so
Speaker 6: I don't think anytime soon we're going to have Iran
Speaker 6: like literally getting rid of Israel. I would not trust
Speaker 6: the Ayatolas and the Mulas. I think they're probably compromised
Speaker 6: stooges to degree. I mean, why else does the US
Speaker 6: give these people billions of dollars right, as well as
Speaker 6: giving Israel billions of dollars right. So there's there's some
Speaker 6: kind of allowed status for certain bad guys baddies. I'm
Speaker 6: not saying that this is everywhere. I'm still working out
Speaker 6: a lot of these positions and theories. I don't have
Speaker 6: it all figured out. I think Castro was kind of
Speaker 6: an allowed excuse villain because you have these like bad
Speaker 6: guys that are allowed to stay in certain areas that
Speaker 6: could very easily be taken out right, and they only
Speaker 6: go after the bad guys that they want to for
Speaker 6: certain reasons, right, They're not really going after bad guys.
Speaker 6: So you know, Kim Jong is he can be the
Speaker 6: excuse to be the threat and police that region. Castro
Speaker 6: is the excuse to police this area. Putin, I think
Speaker 6: there's a degree of real East West war but also
Speaker 6: a degree of agreed allowed conflicts going on. Now, maybe
Speaker 6: it spins out of control, maybe it gets worse, maybe
Speaker 6: it's crazier, but anyway, that's my take. So I think
Speaker 6: the same with I think the same with the Fabians,
Speaker 6: like from their vantage point. They're not really worried about.
Speaker 6: I think they have a real commitment to the long
Speaker 6: term dialectic and slow kill model. James three dollars. Is
Speaker 6: the CIA Schmimann connection something that you'll talk about, you
Speaker 6: talking about father Alexander Schmieman. Yeah, So, by the way,
Speaker 6: this is not controversial. Maybe a lot of people don't
Speaker 6: know this, but Schmiman during the Cold War was and
Speaker 6: did have CIA connections. Will you talk about grandson Grant?
Speaker 6: I think you mean grandson. I don't know what that
Speaker 6: means grandn CFR. Do you mean grandson? Now, I don't
Speaker 6: know about this. Are you saying that Schmiman has a
Speaker 6: grandson that's in the CFR. And by the way, I'm
Speaker 6: not even necessarily saying that that makes father Schmiman a
Speaker 6: bad guy. I think a lot of people during the
Speaker 6: Cold War, really truly, you know, thought hey, we gotta
Speaker 6: we got to fight the Soviets, you know they're going
Speaker 6: to take over. But it also could explain, you know,
Speaker 6: why there's the ecumenist elements within father Schmeimen. So I've
Speaker 6: never really been a huge Schmimen fan. I've read a
Speaker 6: couple of I've read three of his books. So I've
Speaker 6: read the Liturgical book, I've read for the Life of
Speaker 6: the World, and then I have that Church World Mission book,
Speaker 6: which is really a humanist So I kind of once
Speaker 6: I read that, I just didn't care about him anymore.
Speaker 6: Now you're saying he has a grandson or a godson. Oh,
Speaker 6: maybe you meant godson. What was your I think you
Speaker 6: mean grandson. Okay, So Schmiman's son goes to Harvard Columbia. Uh, Serge,
Speaker 6: he did a movie Behind the Hatred. I don't know
Speaker 6: anything about who this person is. So does he have
Speaker 6: a grandson? Is that this Adam guy? Who is the grandson?
Speaker 6: I don't know who that is. I'm just trying to
Speaker 6: find who you're talking about this cfr I'm still not
Speaker 6: Are you saying Serge is Cfrge was a New York
Speaker 6: Times reporter Harvard Columbia. Yeah, I mean that's obviously a
Speaker 6: lot of that's probably going to be Slavic studies. Yeah,
Speaker 6: I mean this is probably like CIA stuff here, ap.
Speaker 6: I mean Harvard University is like hive of CIA, you know. Anyway,
Speaker 6: long story short, there is a connection between the the
Speaker 6: Cold War origins of the O c A and the CIA,
Speaker 6: and it's pretty well known for people that even the clergy,
Speaker 6: I mean it's clerics are the ones that have told
Speaker 6: me this from various jurisdictions and even from the OCA,
Speaker 6: multiple clerics. Seems to me like the OCA was a
Speaker 6: big psyop for Orthodox to me, but I don't live
Speaker 6: in the US. Massive influence in the St. Sergeion Ecumenist Institute, Yeah,
Speaker 6: I wouldn't be surprised. Ours six one hundred dollars. Wow,
Speaker 6: thank you so much, appreciate that ours, Thank you for
Speaker 6: the stream. Well, thank you ours for the support you
Speaker 6: and Elon's Chip have been great tonight, low pan ten dollars.
Speaker 6: If you haven't already checked out, think tanks and power. Oh,
Speaker 6: this sounds like a good one. Think tanks because this
Speaker 6: is the stuff nobody studies and nobody cared. These are
Speaker 6: the real people that control and run the world. And
Speaker 6: you'll notice that none of your normy conservative people ever
Speaker 6: talk about this. They only talk about the Libs. They
Speaker 6: don't talk about the rancorporation and the Carnegie and the
Speaker 6: Rockefeller and the blah blah blah blah, all the stuff
Speaker 6: that I talk about for over ten years. None of
Speaker 6: them talk about it. But I'm crazy and blah blah blah.
Speaker 6: If you haven't checked out think tanks and power in
Speaker 6: foreign policy, I will definitely that's right. On my own
Speaker 6: study of the influence and role of the Council Foreign
Speaker 6: Relations and the RIA. Say Millen published publication from two
Speaker 6: thousand and four writing that down. Thank you so much,
Speaker 6: low Pan noge double five dollars, Thank you so much.
Speaker 6: Knowledge appreciate that, doctor Egman one dollar. What is the
Speaker 6: aschological purpose of Mars and the planets? I mean, I
Speaker 6: would speculate that the Eastern fathers speculate that the universe
Speaker 6: is for a man to populate and to cultivate, like
Speaker 6: Eden was. The whole world was originally going to be Eden,
Speaker 6: so presumably the universe would be the expansion of Eden.
Speaker 6: Brendan MASSI five dollars. I work in the private equity space,
Speaker 6: Jay and many have done deals with large institutions. These
Speaker 6: large institutions, I have a unique insight into how they
Speaker 6: use financial tools such as tax exempt financing to shift
Speaker 6: capital market. It's for their agenda. It is very calculated exactly.
Speaker 6: That's a great point. That's an area I don't know
Speaker 6: much about, but I'm not surprised. But wouldn't that demonstrate
Speaker 6: that clearly far more is organized and engineered in our
Speaker 6: world than what the normy conservatives think. No face kill
Speaker 6: of five dollars. How in the world did the Hayes
Speaker 6: code let a film like Lolita slide in nineteen sixty two?
Speaker 6: Interesting theory, A good point. I mean, I hadn't thought
Speaker 6: about that. Maybe it was they paid them off. I've
Speaker 6: never seen Lolita actually, so I know I've seen Kuber
Speaker 6: you know, all the other Kuberg movies, but I've not
Speaker 6: actually seen Lolita, so I don't know if it doesn't
Speaker 6: actually show anything. So maybe you could have like difficult
Speaker 6: themes in a movie, but you couldn't show it. So,
Speaker 6: but I haven't actually seen it, so I don't know.
Speaker 6: Colin twenty five dollars. I'm a new viewer here. Thank
Speaker 6: you for this great content. Well, hey, welcome, Colin. Thank
Speaker 6: you so much for your support, much of prepreciated. Hopefully
Speaker 6: you're learning and deriving some valuable infotainment. We try to
Speaker 6: provide a mix of both right information and entertainment, so
Speaker 6: some infotainment. By the way, if you've not major way
Speaker 6: over to X to follow me, please do so. I'm
Speaker 6: almost edging up towards one hundred k on X, really
Speaker 6: looking forward to having a one hundred k X party.
Speaker 6: We love to have our parties. It's like the office
Speaker 6: over here. I'm like Michael Scott, where everything involves the
Speaker 6: party planning committee. And that's you guys in my mods,
Speaker 6: the beautiful, wonderful, fast Boy and fast Girl mods that
Speaker 6: we have. Love you guys so much. You guys are
Speaker 6: great mods. Love love all you regulars, and we got
Speaker 6: to welcome new people. We got a we're still getting about.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 6: I wish the growth was as good as it was
Speaker 6: on X, but it's not too bad. Like over here
Speaker 6: on YouTube, we're still getting about two thousand a month,
Speaker 6: so we're getting you know, new p That's good, guys.
Speaker 6: I want to remind you too that I do have
Speaker 6: a show's sponsor, and our show sponsor is the one only,
Speaker 6: the best in supplementation. It is the premiere, the premiere
Speaker 6: in supplementation Chalk dot com choq dot com. If you
Speaker 6: use the link in the show description choq dot com,
Speaker 6: it will take you over to their page and uh
Speaker 6: you can find everything that you need for becoming toxically
Speaker 6: masculine and it's not just Forduce. There's also some good
Speaker 6: stuff for the ladies as well. If you enjoy working out,
Speaker 6: if you enjoy an active lifestyle, to try to, you know,
Speaker 6: keep that body fit, to try to keep them thick
Speaker 6: thighs like I got them thick with three C's birthing
Speaker 6: hips like I've got. If you want that thick, thick
Speaker 6: hip like I got over here, if you want them gains,
Speaker 6: all of my gains, they go to my hips. I
Speaker 6: got like super buff built glutes and hips and everything
Speaker 6: else is like skinny. It's really weird, but it's also
Speaker 6: kind of cool. Just kidding. Actually, everybody over here should
Speaker 6: be heading over to a c hoq dot com use
Speaker 6: the promo code J forty if you want to test
Speaker 6: it out and get forty percent off. Yeah. What if
Speaker 6: what if I skipped leg and upper body day and
Speaker 6: the only thing I didn't skip was hips and glutes.
Speaker 6: That's all I worked out, and so I have like
Speaker 6: a giant booty and giant thick hips with Triple C's baby,
Speaker 6: you know what I'm saying. What if I was like that,
Speaker 6: I would still have to thank chalk dot com. And
Speaker 6: so we're gonna have a little brief message, we got
Speaker 6: more super chest to go to, but let's hear from
Speaker 6: our friend Vivek Roboswami real quick.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode is your ultimate natural pre workout designed to
Speaker 13: take your performance to the next level. Chad Mode is
Speaker 13: for natty beast alphas only. Whether you're hitting the gym,
Speaker 13: invading a favella, conquering a small village, gambling, burning the
Speaker 13: midnight oil, mogging on your coworkers, or getting banned from Facebook,
Speaker 13: chad Mode gives you the competitive edge you need. It's
Speaker 13: as simple as mixing one or two scoops of our
Speaker 13: fine powder into water or juice, providing you with a delicious,
Speaker 13: energizing beverage featuring a burst of sweet organic fruit flavor.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode will give you the extra edge you desperately crave.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode stands out from the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners,
Speaker 13: and dyes. We've even avoided so called natural flavors, ensuring
Speaker 13: a clean and effective formula. Only soy boys and Beta's guzzle,
Speaker 13: blue dye and sucralose further tanking they're already low testosterone levels.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode is made in America, Unlike your common TikTok
Speaker 13: peasants' pre workout powder. It does not contain Chinese lab
Speaker 13: made caffeine and artificial sweeteners that soyboys so often crave.
Speaker 13: Experience the pure goodness of chad Mode with Blue Magic
Speaker 13: registered trademark organic blue Spirillina extract, organic lemon cherry and
Speaker 13: organic maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine. Embrace the natural power
Speaker 13: of organic green coffee bean extract. Each dose of chad
Speaker 13: Mode mirrors the caffeine of a cup and a half
Speaker 13: of coffee, delivering a surge of energy. Alongside essential vitamins, minerals,
Speaker 13: amino acids, and herbal extracts. Chad Mode will allow you
Speaker 13: to fire your boss and mog on anyone who opposes you.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode will give you a dominant and aggressive edge,
Speaker 13: like a lion hunting a gazelle, where the gazelle is
Speaker 13: a TikTok Jim Zoomer macro guzzling sucralose on the daily,
Speaker 13: edging to TNF videos. Whether you're seeking a high poten
Speaker 13: sed junk free pre workout or a better way to
Speaker 13: kickstart your day, chad Mode has you covered. It's not
Speaker 13: just for men. Chad Mode is a solution for anyone
Speaker 13: ready to conquer their fitness us and life goals, dominate
Speaker 13: their coworkers, and aggressively gamble their life savings. Don't miss
Speaker 13: out security.
Speaker 6: Jamie loves the female vitality products like the Shila JiTT Ashwaganda.
Speaker 6: I'm sorry I got distracted because I was over here
Speaker 6: sneezing and I forgot to unmute. I have to mute
Speaker 6: when the ad plays or else it doesn't work right.
Speaker 6: And sometimes when you click to unmute, it doesn't register
Speaker 6: because there's so many things running at the same time,
Speaker 6: and so they slows the computer down, and we got
Speaker 6: freaking Tom Cruise's face over here further slowing the computer dome. Also, guys,
Speaker 6: remember to head on over to Jamie's channel and watch
Speaker 6: the show that she premiered with Paranoid American, who we
Speaker 6: met at Brohemian Grove the day that I got super
Speaker 6: super super sick the first day where I was basically incapacitated,
Speaker 6: and Jamie and Paranoid American covered Disney Theosophy and they
Speaker 6: went really deep into Disney's use of and promotion of theosophy.
Speaker 6: So be sure and check out that Jay Chalk is epic.
Speaker 6: It really is a great product. I mean, the great
Speaker 6: thing about being sponsors like I have access to basically
Speaker 6: infinite chalk. I take it all the time, I really do.
Speaker 6: I took I took Tonkat the last two or three
Speaker 6: days and gave me that energy boost basically to finally
Speaker 6: get back to working out because of being sick. So
Speaker 6: I haven't worked out in two weeks because of basically
Speaker 6: just the worst stomach virus ever. But then I took
Speaker 6: chalk the past couple of days and I'm back to
Speaker 6: working out. So I do attribute that to Chalk dot com.
Speaker 6: So once again, ton Kettle is my favorite. But there's
Speaker 6: advantages to all these other products, and so when you
Speaker 6: head on over there, remember to use the promo code
Speaker 6: J forty four life to get forty four percent off.
Speaker 6: Like I said, we only got ten percent over here
Speaker 6: at ladies, but ladies can make use of this. I
Speaker 6: recommend the Performance Stack to dudes, but there's other options
Speaker 6: and other possibilities over there. But this is just the
Speaker 6: easiest way to go about. If you're a guy and
Speaker 6: you want to get access to what's the best, then
Speaker 6: add it to your car. Uses Bermaco J forty four Life,
Speaker 6: jy four four Live, and you can cancel at any time,
Speaker 6: so you're not bound by any contracts or anything like that.
Speaker 6: If you sign up, you get it coming on the regular. Yeah.
Speaker 6: I take chalk consistently. Absolutely. I don't take every day.
Speaker 6: I would say I stagger it to about every other day.
Speaker 6: I didn't take it when I was sick because I
Speaker 6: had like severe viral stomach infection, so basically nothing was
Speaker 6: My stomach would not accept anything, not even broth. I
Speaker 6: mean it was. It was the worst illness I've ever
Speaker 6: had in my life by far. I would have preferred
Speaker 6: like a one to two day food poisoning over what
Speaker 6: I had, like literally Serf and Leo three dollars. What
Speaker 6: is your take on Trump's cabinet picks as a reason
Speaker 6: for optimism or sign of a repeat. I mean, I
Speaker 6: think we've got a better crop of people than twenty sixteen. Right,
Speaker 6: twenty sixteen was it seemed like like the early picks
Speaker 6: were like the decent people and then it immediately flipped
Speaker 6: to neocons. Is that right? So hopefully we won't. We
Speaker 6: got some decent better than we expected. There's a couple
Speaker 6: bad apples. Maybe we can hope for you know, I'm
Speaker 6: liking Trump's rhetoric, you know what I mean these I
Speaker 6: mean AJ played a clip of Trump today just like like,
Speaker 6: I mean, we have national emergency, national emergency on the border,
Speaker 6: national emergency on the debt. I mean, this is all
Speaker 6: the right rhetoric. Let's hope that it's not just rhetoric.
Speaker 6: ED five dollars. What about the abolition of the family
Speaker 6: and its effects on modern society? Yeah, I mean this
Speaker 6: is one of the absolutely central planks of not just
Speaker 6: communist manifesto, but what the Fabian socialists technocrats have had
Speaker 6: for like ever, right, So, I mean that's something that
Speaker 6: we have touched.
Speaker 5: On a lot.
Speaker 6: I mean, really, the whole deep hop and all of
Speaker 6: that is first and foremost centered around the destruction of
Speaker 6: the relationship between men and women and the family. So
Speaker 6: a lot of this gender agitation that you see all
Speaker 6: over the internet, a lot of that plays into what
Speaker 6: we're talking about in terms of the destruction of the
Speaker 6: family and thus the destruction of Western civilization. And again,
Speaker 6: for the criticisms that we would have of a Coleman,
Speaker 6: he did actually accurately predict that Tavistock and the Fabians
Speaker 6: would literally destroy the family to destroy Western civilization. And again,
Speaker 6: if you go back a couple of nights ago, when
Speaker 6: I covered Frankfurt School, we had MARKUSA Reich Authoritarian personality
Speaker 6: disorder put out by Frankfurt School Freud. They were all
Speaker 6: basically saying the same thing that in order to have
Speaker 6: the overthrow Western civilization, you have to destroy the family.
Speaker 6: The way to destroy the family is to destroy the patriarchy.
Speaker 6: The way to destroy the patriarchy is feminism. But the
Speaker 6: only way to make feminism successful is through the sex revolution,
Speaker 6: and the way to have that is to bring back
Speaker 6: goddess worship and feminism. So yes, we covered that, William
Speaker 6: one dollar. It's hard to imagine where many of us
Speaker 6: would be without the work that you've done. Jay, I
Speaker 6: thank you. Can't thank you enough for spelling out these
Speaker 6: things for a lot of these slow boys. Hey, you
Speaker 6: guys aren't slow. You guys are learning, and we are
Speaker 6: making progress and you guys are becoming fast boys. And
Speaker 6: that's really what I see my role as. So yeah,
Speaker 6: thank you. I'm glad. I'm feeling better too. I mean, basically,
Speaker 6: I just couldn't do anything for about although I did
Speaker 6: do a couple of live streams. It took me a
Speaker 6: while to have the energy to do a couple of
Speaker 6: live streams when I was sick, but I'm fully over
Speaker 6: the sick now. So but if you come over to
Speaker 6: the channel, let's see see Secret Philosophy of the Left
Speaker 6: that we did three days ago. That was Frankfurt School
Speaker 6: and Sex, and then Psychology of the Left History and
Speaker 6: Analysis was also relevant to this is almost kind of
Speaker 6: like a part three in this Mindset of the Left
Speaker 6: series that we've been kind of doing here. So be
Speaker 6: sure and go back and watch those. If you miss them,
Speaker 6: go watch Jamie Show. Guys. Also, if you want signed
Speaker 6: copies of my books, you can head on over to
Speaker 6: the shop at Jays Analysis. Every book over there is
Speaker 6: a signed copy. Absolutely, don't worry about it. You don't
Speaker 6: have to request it. They're all signed, and I usually
Speaker 6: just make it out to the name of the person
Speaker 6: that buys the book. Again, that's in the shop right here.
Speaker 6: I'll show you guys that and look forward. Looking forward
Speaker 6: to Esoteric Hollywood three. I hope you guys are as well.
Speaker 6: Getting back to work on that this week, so maybe
Speaker 6: the next three weeks I can have I'm gonna shoot
Speaker 6: for the next two weeks to have the next fifty pages,
Speaker 6: and then we'll have three hundred and fifty pages. But
Speaker 6: if you want signed copies, if you've not read Esoteric
Speaker 6: Hollywood one and two, go ahead and get signed copies
Speaker 6: of that, because although the books do stand alone, it
Speaker 6: will be the completion of a trilogy. So Star Hollywood
Speaker 6: three is going to be called esoter Hollywood, Sex Cults,
Speaker 6: and Apocalypse in film. It's not just about apocalypse movies,
Speaker 6: so don't get that impression. It's a lot of movies
Speaker 6: like the first two, but the last section will be
Speaker 6: about the apocalypse in Hollywood because Hollywood is undergoing it's
Speaker 6: apocalypse at least in the way that we've all known.
Speaker 6: The classical Hollywood studio machine that's going away now. Unfortunately
Speaker 6: now it's the big tech studio, it's Amazon, it's Apple Studios, right,
Speaker 6: So I don't know that's going to get any better,
Speaker 6: but Hollywood at least is going away, so maybe there's
Speaker 6: positive science for that. What are your top five books?
Speaker 6: Ed says for three dollars, I have a video where
Speaker 6: I did top ten books that are top fifteen books
Speaker 6: that everyone should read, So I would say go to
Speaker 6: my YouTube channel and then top in type in top
Speaker 6: books Jade Eyer. That should bring it up. Let's seef
Speaker 6: that brings it up. Fifteen books to Read before you
Speaker 6: die or top fifteen Orthodox books, so you could check
Speaker 6: out those right there. But thank you for that, Ed
Speaker 6: Bebski ten dollars. Shout out to Jay and all the
Speaker 6: high IQ peeps that are paying attention to what really matters.
Speaker 6: Thank you for all your content and your positive influence.
Speaker 6: God bless you. Thank you so much. Bebski appreciate that.
Speaker 6: And guys, remember you can always support me also at
Speaker 6: any time, send a super chat at any time and
Speaker 6: I'll read on the next stream. And this is part one,
Speaker 6: So for part two, we'll work our way through the
Speaker 6: rest of the Tabstock book for you guys, and we'll
Speaker 6: grade a doctor Coleman on where he was right, where
Speaker 6: he was wrong,