Speaker 1: So insane, so insane.
Speaker 2: It is so insane. Bunker bunker, bunker.
Speaker 3: Loco.
Speaker 4: I got married. I got married to a funk. We
got wedded, conjoined in the subway.
Speaker 5: He shot o.
Speaker 4: I am married. I'm married to Mauco. But we got
joined co write is soon a subway shot.
Speaker 6: Vitamins and biscuits and minerals they come to even to
My whole life is spent.
Speaker 5: What he got to? Tom m hmm, what.
Speaker 6: Of world?
Speaker 3: I'm married to amonger who.
Speaker 4: We got wedding, we got joined in the subway, shot
over the road, and minerals then come to you to.
Speaker 6: And minerals then come from this year too.
Speaker 3: Fun bunk.
Speaker 4: I got married. I got married to my bunk huber
who we got waded? Who we got joined?
Speaker 6: Somewhere shall I'm gonna show off something that we're all
proud of. I got a browser here.
Speaker 5: This is uh jayder.
Speaker 7: I'm married to a buncle pop oh.
Speaker 8: Oh, we got better at conjoined in a subway shop.
Speaker 7: Oh oh, I'm married to a buncle pop oh by
a man's metals. They come to me through a tube.
My whole life it's been watching on tu whoa oh.
Speaker 8: Oh, we got weard it courtius then a subway shop.
Oh we got weard a courtis in a subway shop.
Oh we got wetted court us there in a subway shop.
Speaker 9: Oh oh, I got every too a fuck pap.
Speaker 10: Whoa we got ready conjoint in the subway shop for.
Speaker 7: I'm married to uncle Paphoa.
Speaker 10: I imagine made Rosie come to me through to bo
like a stick watching.
Speaker 5: Down the tub.
Speaker 7: Whoa, whoa open.
Speaker 9: Ready joint to say the subway shot over?
Speaker 10: We got waiting for the s subway shops out.
Speaker 6: A welcome everybody. I wanted to remind you that you
are my little Internet children, and I'm wearing a wholesome
button up, dad core button up perhaps something that your
own daddy is where I'm not physically biologically your daddy,
although some of you might want to check with your
mom to make sure that that is or isn't the case.
I am, however, your mind daddy today, and just think
of me as a wholesome dad core button up kind
of dude today. Today we're going to have a nice
chill conversation about the Tavistock institute the world's foremost brainwashing entity.
Now I know for sure that I did an analysis
of this, because I have a ton of notes, but
I don't know where that analysis is. I want to
say that maybe something happened to where I had to
make it a private talk. I don't remember. It seems
like maybe maybe a year ago we covered this, but
I couldn't find where I covered it. So I began
reading another book, as you guys know, which I have
mentioned off and on, and I'm just kind of reading
this one here and there, various chapters, and this is
Coleman's book on socialism, One World Order, Socialist Dictation, and
it's yet another history of the Tavist, I mean not
Tavist talk of Fabian socialism. And of course yes it
does correct connect directly to the ralph Child Empire, so
that is part of this story. But this book goes
really deep into the history of the FDR period and
then prior to that, Woodrow Wilson and how Wilson and
FDR were really the central pivot figures to move America
into socialism. And of course you guys know that today
we live definitely under an America that is heavily socialized
in the classical Fabian socialist sense, not in a outright
hardcore Marxist sense. And one thing that I appreciate about
doctor Coleman, whatever you think about him, And we do
have criticisms that we're going to make, so we'll get
to that right away at the very beginning, before you
just assume that I'm taking wholesale everything that Coleman says.
I'm very aware of the criticisms, and I have criticisms
too of his books. The weaknesses he does point out
that I think is worth giving him credit for. On
the back of the book which he wrote this in
nineteen ninety eight, he said, while our attention was focused
on communism in Moscow, it was actually the socialist in
Washington that were actually stealing America. So he was on
the right track, okay, and he did get some things wrong.
He made some goofy mistakes. Now I'm very aware of
Richard Grove's criticisms. I've had long conversations with Richard Grove
about this book and Coleman's other books, and particularly as
you guys know, we did do a full lecture through
committee a three hundred maybe a year ago. But what's
come back into print recently is his Tabostop book. And
this was out of print for about ten years. You
could not find this book for about ten years. My
allergies are going crazy due to the cocaine that I
snorted in giant twenty Montenna style pile. I got a
Tonia Montana style pile of cocaine. Now I'm about to
do a bunch of rogain. Now I'm about to do
a bunch of Now I'm about to have a migraine.
Y'all like that freestyle Tavista, I can see human relation.
We did do a talk through this book again a year.
I don't know where that talk is. I have no idea.
I mean, I think it's somewhere, maybe for members. But
I want to compare it to the official History of Tavistock.
So we're going to see what did Coleman get correct?
What things lined up? Now that HV. Dix, He's an
actual person from Tavistock, and he wrote this history in
nineteen seventy. It's published by Rutledge, which is an academic
system based publication. And we're going to notice that a
lot of the key characters that are mentioned by Coleman
absolutely make up the official history of Tavistock. And so
we'll look at a little bit of that and the
members involved. But the reason we're talking about Tavistak is
because we couldn't get to where we are without a
lot of of cunning, strategy, planning and tactics. Now, remember,
most of the right wing people today, the normy conservative world,
still has not figured out that it's actually a designed
plan of what happened. They think that it's just one
damn thing after another in history. There's no strategy, there's
no cunning, there's no organizational structure or plan too a
long term destabilization and destruction of Western civilization. And so
what we do, as you know, is we lecture through
on my channel. One of the things we do we
lecture through the writings of the elite from their perspective.
That's the majority of the big texts that we've lectured through.
This is the Global Elite book series. Man, allergies are
going crazy today, and every now and then we do
kind of step into the domain of the prophetic conspiracy theorizers.
And one of those that's very famous and been around
for a long time is doctor John Coleman. Now we
don't exactly know for sure if doctor John Coleman really
was in British intelligence. This is his claim. I'm not
saying that he wasn't, but I'm not saying that he was.
We don't exactly know what we have are many of
his books. If you remember back in the day in
the old School Lord Baltimore, days before doctor Coleman passed away,
he was on Lord Baltimore many times. I remember listening
to many interviews with doctor John Coleman. And there's a
couple key criticisms we want to make. First of all,
it would have been good. And again he was Boomer,
you know, or maybe even a little older than Boomer,
so he wasn't really interested in kind of sourcing or
validating the claims. It was just kind of like, hey,
you know, in British intelligence and I saw a lot
of things and blah blah blah. Maybe he did, maybe
he didn't. Right, But here's the thing about the Boomer
era of this type of crew. I would say he's
above the Fritz Springmeier class of people. Right, there's definitely
some there's a lot more meat going on here than
what we would get from say Fritz. And I'm not
saying everything Fritz said was wrong, but there's a lot
of kooky stuff in there, and there's a lot of
reliance on very goofy, shady sources, right like John Todd,
who's obviously a kind of a quack con man. And
I think it really shot the Bloodlin's book in the
foot for him to rely on these sort of dubious characters.
But I will say first of all that it's not
the case that Coleman has no bibliography. The mistake was
that he didn't actually source the book very well in
the actual page of the book, and maybe that was
whoever printed it. But there is a bibliography. Okay, so
let's see. First of all, maybe let's make this full
full screen so you can see we do have a bibliography.
There are quite a few sourced elite texts. They're not
conspiracy texts. Most of these are in this book. Tavistock Publications.
We have a lot of the texts that I cover,
like Burne's and so forth. We've lectured through Brene's, We've
lectured through some of these other things, doctor Kurt Lewin.
So we've got Tavistock and Frankfurt School people referenced as sources.
We've got some of the social engineering elites that you've
heard me talk about for a long time. We've got Brazenski,
We've got Hadley Cantrell, We've got Krypskaya, we've got Huxley. Okay,
these are all sources in the bibliography of Tavistock. We've
got doctor Gregory bateson keymk Ultra doctor as well, source documents,
source works. We've got Margaret Meade, Artie Lang fdr. We've
got several other Tavistock adjacent publications about the organizational man,
the company man, this kind of stuff. So one, two, three, four, five, six,
seven pages of bibliography. That's not too bad. Okay, So
that's not terrible. It would have been nice if he
had footnoted within the text, but he didn't do that.
He just wrote the book and then and he does
have a lot of citations, but we don't know where
those citations come. So for example, here he cites Tavistock luminary,
John Rollings Rees, but it doesn't really tell us where
that comes from. He just says the nineteen fifty four
from re Okay, so that's a valid criticism. The other
books are kind of similar. For example, in the One
World Socialist book, we do have an in notes of sorts.
So you'll notice that we do have sources. We have
a lot of CFR publications. This book has a tremendous
amount of Fabian society publications, so very well sourced in
that regard, because this book largely argues that socialism in
America was successful through the Fabians. So here we have
again another page of bibliography. He does discuss the role
of Ralph Child of the Zionism plays a role. Another
page of sources. So is it the case that there's
no sources. Well, let's look at the other book, The
Community three hundred, probably the most controversial of the books,
and it does have a bibliography. Now this one, I
would argue, is a little more meaty. The sources here
are actually a little bit better. He even begins his
sources by saying nineteen eighty four is actually a source
for Fabian socialist ideology, which is something that we've been
arguing as well. So you know, well, you'll notice we
have a lot of older publications about the British Empire
and Opium plays a big role of in this book.
I actually bought a couple of these old publications that
I could find that he mentions Felix Frankfurter, he argues,
plays a big role. Another one of the key character
that he identifies that the Rakowski interrogation identified, which again
makes me think there's probably something to this, is Bruce
Lockhart Memoirs of a British Agent, and he, as you
guys remember, was one of the key operatives working to
be liaison between Lord Milner and the Bolsheviks for British Intelligence. Now,
the public story was that most of British Intelligence, and
many of them I think, really did hate and oppose
the Bolsheviks, but Lord Milner, because he was not necessarily
opposed to Bolshevism, he was a Fabian. He wanted a
positive relationship secretly with Bolsheviks, and the key operative for
that was Bruce Lockhart. And again this is correct. I
bought a very rare publication of the memoirs of British
Intelligence operative Bruce Lockhart. This was the guy that I
couldn't think of his name when we were doing the
discussion with Tristan. He's not a journalist, he's a British spy.
Now I have this mainline publication, but the mainline publication
is I would imagine kind of whitewashed, but you see
this right here, British agent br r H. Bruce Lockhart.
I bought that, so I have that text. And in
the last chapter he discusses his being in Moscow during
the Bolshevik period. Sorry, I meant to flip over to this.
There it is. As you can see, that's Bruce Lockhart.
He's not a journalist. He's one of the most famous,
lesser known British spies and also someone kind of at
the level of Bruce Lockhart is Sidney Riley. As we
talked about, the character who plays a very key role
in influencing James Bond. Sidney Riley, of course was a
Jewish spy for the British Empire. Who what do you know?
He plays both sides? Is he against the Soviets? Is
he pro Soviet? Well, he's kind of like Lord Victor Rothchild.
He seems to be on both sides. But to get
back to the Coleman book, he mentions a lot of
the texts that you would hear me mention quickly, texts
that we've gone through all the cecil roads texts are there.
Now you understand this is not conspiracy theory. This is
actually mainline intelligence history from Lockhart's own memoirs that he
was the liaison to the Bolsheviks secretly for the British government.
So what else do we have in We have Public
Opinion by Walter Lippmann. Oh, turns out this is a
key Tavistock text, and that's correct. So Coleman is correct
about that. We have the whole history of Stanford Research Institute,
Paul Erlik, the Malthusians are mentioned, history of the rock
Killer family all mentioned. Razenski comes up again, Diaries of
Bruce Lockhart, which I just mentioned, Edward Barnet's Engineering of Consent,
Malachi Martin's History of the Jesuits, which is an odd one.
I didn't expect that to be here, but it does
play a role because of course, the Jesuits did, as
we know from the Weimhoff book, align themselves directly with
the CIA in America at least through John Courtney Murray
and others at the time of Vatican two. And that
is why Vatican two was able to push through so
many things, so to speak, that were amenable to Americanism
in the CIA. So we're going pretty deep today. By
the way. Props to all you Bitcoin maxis and Bitcoin
holders because we had yet another all time high today,
so we're looking forward to that one hundred k coming
pretty soon, I feel sure. So history of the Huxley
family is in here. Limits to growth, Classics of the
global elites, roundtable groups, roundtable movement, Jeremy Bentham, the famous
Utilitarian pdf, Humanistic Psychology, Hadley Cantrell, Instant for Pacific Relations,
Instanse Social Research. So I think that we could say
that Coleman's book has flaws, but here's the thing. Overall,
he pretty much got what the story was correct. The
other thing that's kind of embarrassing is that he claims
that the Frankfurt School guys like Adorno wrote the Beatles songs.
I don't I'm not convinced of that. I've never seen
evidence of that. That's just kind of an outlandish claim.
It's just an assertion that he makes. So I think
in a few places here and there, Coleman will be
pretty much on the right track. But then they'll kind
of make these leaps. And we see this unfortunately in
a lot of this domain right alternative media and the
so called conspiracy sphere. We've talked about two key fallacies
that are always there. They always have to watch out for.
If you guys, remember they are the I'm gonna mention
the two and then I want to add a third one,
the Texas sharpshooter fallacy and the gambler's fallacy. Those are
very common in the conspiracy analysis domain, and they're really
just kind of variations of because something happened in the past,
or because I'm very close, then therefore this must have
been the case, and this must be the conclusion. Right.
But just because you roll the number five times in
a row, there's nothing that dictates that you will roll
a five the fourth time, right, It's a non sequitor.
And so likewise, because people are associated, it doesn't necessarily
follow that they are consciously involved in furthering the same agenda.
They may or they may not be. And even being
invited to different global events or souirays or whatever does
not necessarily mean that you knew what's going on, or
you were fully aware, or you know, you were party
to the conspiracy. That's why we have to be very
precise and not lump people together. For example, I get
lumped in all the time with all kinds of crazy stuff. Oh,
one time in twenty sixteen, you went on this podcast.
Therefore you work with these people, right, you must be
party to their conspiracy. And it's just, you know, simply
not the case. For example, I went on some podcasts
in twenty sixteen seventeen, and the people whose podcasts went
on they went in a totally different direction. I don't
have any personal like fallout or animosity with these people.
But for example, a certain podcasts went in the direction
of neopaganism. I don't believe in neopaganism, and I tried
to argue and sort of nudge people out of the
neopagan domain, and those individuals continued in that direction, and
so I didn't go on that podcast anymore. But it
has nothing else. It's like I didn't like fall out
with it. I have some big fire or something like that.
It's just that's not the direction that I'm going in
and that's not what I believe. So you see what
people are Still they could still say, oh, well, you
see you're associated with them because of a podcast where
they interviewed you in twenty sixteen, But it doesn't follow
from that that I'm on the same page that I
agree or whatever. No, I'm talking about twenty sixteen man
I'm talking way before any of this stuff. But you
see what I'm saying is like you you could you
I could say, well, he was on that podcast, so
they worked together. Well, it would be a non sequitor
because I'm telling you what was really going on was, Yeah,
I went on a podcast multiple times and I explained
to them this and that and I disagree, and then
we just went in different directions. So there's always this
and the left does this too. Everybody knows the left
does this right where they say, oh, you went on whatever,
so you're part of a you know, right wing whatever,
fascist organization because you had a conversation with somebody on
this podcast seven years ago. It's guilt by association, right. No,
it wasn't David Like. I've never never I've never talked
to David Ike directly. He used to link my film
analysis forever. I mean, I don't even know if he
was Maybe it was his web mat I don't know
if it was David Ike doing it, but I'd say
ten years ago, like, I would get a lot of
David Ike links and I never interacted with David Ike.
He would just link my analysis. So I will say,
for in the case of David Ike, though now, of
course it's not Sam Hide. I went on Sam Hike
a few months ago. I would go I would easily
go back on Sam Hi's podcast. And by the way,
if you would like to see me as part of
the million dollar extreme Sam Hid universe, tell Sam Hide
that now I'm talking about people. He didn't have it
even have a show at this time. It's about twenty sixteen, guys. Anyway,
to get back to John Coleman, I agree with Richard's
critique that there's definitely some leaps that are made and
some claims that are not the case. But remember, just
because boomer Era and the analysts kind of had that
common mistake doesn't mean that we can't derive and see
and appreciate what they got right. I'm not convincing. I
don't think that Ordorno wrote all the Beatles song. To me,
that sounds ridiculous. Could Tavistock have played a role in
furthering the importation of Far Eastern ideologies into rock and
roll music in the nineteen sixties in the UK. Yes,
I think that's very plausible, but I don't think that
we could conclude without some kind of proof. Now I
read a long paper years ago that Adorno wrote about music.
And an interesting thing about Adorno was, who's the fourth
member of MDE. There's a a Alex Is he the
fourth Schultz? Who's I think? Yeah? Tell tweet at Sam
and everybody that maybe it's time to recruit. You know
what I'm saying, Maybe there needs to be a recruitment process.
Maybe there needs to be tryouts. What if there was
a survivor style tryout. Maybe you should tell Samuel J.
Heidenstein that very thing. Let's see if we can. Let's
see if we can find that beautiful, beautiful Twitter account
over here. By the way, if you're not following this
man over here on Twitter, you should this beautiful after
acentric individual, my beautiful Nubian brother, Samuel Heidenstein, you could
follow him right there. Tell tell Sam hide them. Maybe
maybe there needs to be a a new person, you know,
saying like a new member. Anyway, let's get back to
what we were talking about. Okay, enough of this, right,
you guys get the point right? So yeah, we have
we can appreciate doctor Coleman's books. We don't know if
he really was as deep as he was into British intelligence.
I can tell you that as I work through and
double check the references that I found and that I
can so far, I'd say he's about eighty to eighty
five percent accurate so far. So I've not seen any
huge mistakes that would disqualify everything that Coleman says. Maybe
somebody can just debunk it. Richard did send me a
video of a British colonel or general. I forget what
his role was debunking. The problem was that the debunking
was really just everything this guy was saying was his
word against Coleman's, and a lot of the claims that
he was making against Coleman were actually things that I
would I could go and verify. So it's nice to
actually have the HV. Dick's history of Tavistock, which actually
wasn't reprinted until pretty recently. I mean, this looks like
a I mean this came out in nineteen seventy. This
was reprinted in twenty fifteen, so we didn't actually have
like an official history of Tavistock. I don't think on
that was easily accessible until about twenty fifteen when this
came out. So let's get into the Tavastok book and
let's look at some of the theorists and their and
their claims. Now, the other thing is that we also
have the Ratiau book which came out a couple of
years ago that we've covered, and that also backs up
a lot of the research about the Fabian society being
very central to the socializing of America and the leftist takeover.
And it's not divorced from what you're seeing here with
the Vatican two stuff, because Coleman, for example, has an
entire chapter where he argues about the history of ecumenism
and as you've heard me say, and as the Rawtu
book says, ecumenism was a Rockefeller Fabian socialist project to quote,
permeate and penetrate the religious sphere. This began with entities
like the Riverside Church that the Rockefellers put millions of
dollars into. They created their own Protestant church, that is,
the Protestant Church, the Evangelical made up church, as you
guys remember, that has a statue of Darwin, a statue
of Jesus, a statue of Hegel, a statue of Boot
and Moses. Okay, literally in the giant Rockefeller they built
their own Protestant cathedral, it's called Riverside Church. The idea
was that the church should be converted into a soft
socialist institution, not a full on, bloody Emergencis institution, but
a turn the church socialist. And one of the key
Council on Foreign Relation individuals who helped to push this
was a famous Protestant liberal. You probably have heard of
him back in the days of I haven't actually read
this person because I never found that at all interesting
or worthwhile to read these sort of boring liberal boomer Protestants.
But one of the most famous is Reinhold Nieber, and
he was a Union Theological Scenary. Now, if you don't know,
Union Theological Seminary was essentially a Rockefeller created seminary. It
was one of the key institutions that they created to
liberalize and socialize the Protestant Church in America. The Rockefellers
found it much easier to at first, through this model
liberalize and socialized Protestantism because it was so kind of fragmented. Right,
All you have to do is just basically put money
into throw ten million dollars over here, a build a seminary,
and you can control who's who's has the chair of it,
you know, each department, et cetera, et cetera. And so,
starting as a minister with working class sympathies, he shared
with many others a commitment to you got it, pacifism
and socialism. So immediately we have the Kuchianity principles here
that all Kokianity principle people believe socialism and pacifism. Nieber
was a promoter and a fan of the social gospel
and the de indition of true, true religion again is
essentially just a kind of socialism, and he ends up
being a tremendous influence on a lot of the normy
NPC leaders that you might expect Martin Luther King Junior,
Hillary Clinton, Hubert Humphrey, Dean Atchison, Obama a bigvenn right
holding my wife, Michael and right hold neighbor hold a
special blaz mark. We've got Jim Jim McCaul, even Jimmy
Carter right. Neiber was also influential on the right in
the United States, and the Institute of Religion and Democracy
was a conservative think taint that adopted his notion of
quote Christian realism, in other words, social gospel that doesn't
care about theology or you know, dogmatic issues or belief
in the supernatural. It's just a move towards making the
church a in geo basically, so you can see why
this person would be promoted. And of course he serves
as professor at Harvard and Princeton. These are classic OSSCA universities,
and these are institutions from which we get so much
of today's liberalizing and socializing tendencies amongst the Ivy League
power elite. So the plan was to again turn the church,
through socialization and liberation theology, into a socialist institution, and
they were very successful in doing this. They started a
group called the Fellowship of Faiths, and the Fellowship of
Faiths was an acumenist organization committed to the unification of
the world religions. In fact, they began to discuss in
the late eighteen nineties, in the early nineteen hundreds, this
process of unifying all the world religions through some form
of ecumenism. We've covered this many times. This is pre
neiber This is going back to you maybe have heard
of this, but the World Parliament of Religions in eighteen
ninety three. This was a conference that was put on
in eighteen ninety three, and this led to a series
of conferences and meetings in nineteen oh four in Paris
International Congress of the History of Religions, in London in
nineteen twenty four, the Living Religions of the Empire, the
British Empire in nineteen thirteen, in Chicago, nineteen thirty four
the Congress World Fellowship of Faiths, and many of the attendees,
including many of the women that attended, were open socialists.
So this was a rabid social list hive, so to speak.
But not only socialists. Many people may not have been
socialist at all. But this was also supported by any Bassant,
the famous Fabian who talked about a ten point plan
to destroy Christianity in the West and replace it with
a new age, and people like Samuel Untermeyer, I think,
the famous Zionist Yes and Madame Blavatsky also played a
role in theosophy being used as a as a kind
of placeholder or a kind of structure that might be
used to unify all these world religions. So eventually the
Fellowship of Faiths turns into something you may have heard of.
It's called the World Council of Churches, the World Council
of Churches is a heavily Rockefeller and United Nations based
institute that was run at first by a guy connected
with British intelligence. Then this er Hooft, if I remember
his name correctly, Visert Hooft. It's like a weird Dutch guy.
And money for these organizations, as we said, came from
entities like the Laura Spellman Fund, the Carnegie Endowment, and
the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation. And if you know, as you
guys know, this is all backed up in the gigantic
official history of the Rockefeller family. That's one of the
key texts, the Caller and Horovitz text that I first
got back in two thousand and five. And when I
bought that book, I read a bunch of it, and
that's when I first called into Lord Voldemort. I might
I think those clips are gone, but some of you
may have even heard these right where I called in
at the time, and Alex said, hey, this is a
really interesting information. Why don't you write an article. I
wrote a long article about the Rockefeller and Cecil Roads
and Rothschell families, and eventually that's my introduction to write
a few articles back in the day for I n
fo wars, but eventually the strategy for this movement. This
eventually included things like the Bahai faith. Bahai was a
huge test bed where they thought they might be able
to utilize Bahai as a potential future world religion. Theosophy,
as you guys know, quickly says one of the potential
contenders for one of the controlled future world religion was
actually Christian Science, which didn't take off, but I think
it did claim a few Hollywood people. So we got
Christian Science ended up getting Val Kilmer. We did. We
covered this not too long. Christian Science. It was actually
more Hollywood people than I expected. And Christian Science is
kind of a stupid kind of mentalist mentalism cult. It's
kind of dumb. But it did apparently include no this
is pulling up Christian scientists. Okay, here we go. So
one of the reasons why was that Nancy Astor of
the Astor family was a member of the of Christian Science,
and so because she was in the elite circles, she
was one of the key people pushing this. That's why
at the time of the Cliveden set et cetera, the
Astors they thought this might be the potential future World Religion.
Somebody I saw some article claiming Joan Crawford. I don't
know if that's true, but we all know probably the
most famous member of Christian Science today nowadays is Val Kilmer.
Let's see this, This claims Carol Channing, Joan Crawford, Doris Day,
Robert duvall. I didn't know that. Interesting. Allegedly allegedly, Kelsey Grammar,
Howard Hawkes. That's interesting, Val Kilmer, Ginger Rogers. Interesting. So
what you notice about Mary Pickford's a lot of these
early old school Hollywood people. And one of the reasons
that they did this, I think is similar to the
model of what scientology did right where what scientology did
was say, why don't we just recruit a bunch of
famous people and then you know that'll dupe everybody into
joining our cult. That let's the musicians, Bruce Hornsby. Well,
that's a weird one. That's just the way it is.
Some things will never change, oh don't you believe anyway?
But I guess the saddest part of all of that
is Mad Martigan. Mad Martigan, what are you doing in
Christian Science? Bro? You are a hero up to all
eighties children. How could you be in Christian Science.
Speaker 7: Hello, Hello, Mine Mordigan.
Speaker 6: Let's all pray that Val Kilmer leaves this horrible cult. Anyway,
for those that don't know, Christian Science is just like
a dumb mentalism cult where they're like they don't believe
in the deed of Christ or anything. But it's like, oh,
you don't need doctors. You just kind of like think
and heal yourself. It's like, anyway, this didn't end up
catching on, but you can see the pattern here is
that they're sort of testing the waters looking for the
future world religion. Will it be Theosophy, Will it be
the New Age movement that birds the New Age Movement?
Will it be bahaih Will it be Christian Science. What's
it going to be. It's got to be something that
can have like big reach, right, Or will it be
the new Vatican, the monotheistic world religion Vatican that we
now have with the Abu Dhabi Faith Center, Right, We
get a lot of different possibilities. The Fellowship of Faiths
merged with World Zionism and then the League of Nations
and then the Bahai Movement emerged in England and it
formed itself into the Oxford Group which was succeeded by
the moral rearmament following the close of World War Two.
All of these groups played a key role in the
formation of the United Nations, but really these were all
just socialists, loosely speaking. And so we have the ACLU,
the Committee for Economic Development, the Whole House, National Council
for Women, League of Industrial Democracy, Social Democrats, Social Democrats.
That's actually like that overlaps with David Bentley Hart aoc RIGHT,
NATO Institute for Policy Studies, Club of Rome, Cambridge Policy
Study Institute, Lucia's Trust, Aspen Institute, Stanford Research, National Organization
of Women, etc. He argues that all of these were
essentially socialist entities that emerged at this time out of
this domain of permeating and penetrating the religious sphere, and
they could not have done this without large scale gigantor
money support. But how do you get everybody on board
with this? Because even if you're rich, you've got zillions
of dollars, you can't just do whatever you want. You
really got to have mass appeal and mass support. You
got to have the masses on board. That's really crucial.
So the way to do that is to figure out
in a scientific way, all the techniques, tactics, tricks and
scientific procedures of social engineering, mind control and manipulation. That's
where mass media comes in to play a key role.
And the early phases of mass media at the turn
of the last century where the printing press books right,
that was the main forms of mass media back then,
and they quickly understood that they could easily control those
entities without much difficulty. And so before the Tavistock Institute
was set up, we have this very important entity called
Wellington House. And Wellington House was the base from which
the British Government why can I not spell the British
Government set up its World War One propaganda bureau. So
most of the early phases of the research and PayPal,
wi't let me donate to stream lambs. I think you
have to? Is there something going on? Is it not working?
I mean I just had Hades undeads and a super
chat says I don't have a father, So I'll make
you mind internet dad for now. Here's ten dollars for
this dad shirt dire going dad Mo. Thank you so much. Hades.
You should be able to send a superchat through either
PayPal or a credit card through that right there. If
it's credit card, I think give to you a stripe.
So but yeah, you can send a super chat right
there through stream labs. It should be working because somebody
just sent one. Now, Wellington House, as we know, was
this early nineteen fourteen era propaganda agency where David Lloyd
George Chancelled Exchequer was given the task of setting up
a British war propaganda bureau together with the Liberal MP
Charles Masterman. And by the way, these are fabians. Who
do we have at Wellington House? Well, guess what. It's
a lot of people you might expect, Sir Arthur Conan, Doyle, GK. Chess,
Rudyard Kipling, H. G. Wells, Thomas Hardy. Now wait a minute,
A lot of these people are fiction writers. Absolutely, of
course you're gonna have a bunch of fiction writers and
British spy fiction writers doing your propaganda. Who else would
write propaganda? And they came up with this thing called
the Reese Report r E. E. C. This is not
the Recee Committee. This is that's much later on in America.
The Reese Report was a made up, totally fictitious report.
Excuse me, not Bryce Report, I said Reese Bryce Report
b r yse of German outrages. The Kaiser is horrible,
he's just butchering people. And in fact it is well
known nowadays as even this talks about. These are famous
into atrocities that make it an often cited example of warfare,
wartime psychological warfare and propaganda. So it's just properly, it's
not real. It's wartime propaganda made up at the time
of World War One at Wellington House two get support
first of the British people.
Speaker 5: For World War One.
Speaker 6: Now this is again in the early phase and it
ends up eventually being successful because Lord Northcliffe, who was
the owner of The Times and the Daily Mail, was
put in charge of enemy propaganda and all of this
is what is talked about in Coleman's book. This is
all accurate, so that doesn't seem to be much contention
about the these mainline historical accounts of Wellington House, and
this becomes via Lord north Clifton and others, the entity
that will morph into Tavistock. So again we're just looking
at even the mainline stuff that's not even controversial but
pretty much admits everything that we're talking about. Now. Tavasot
really kicks off when this original Wellington House entity morphs
into the World War two era Tavistock Clinic because they
wanted to study shell shock. So we had soldiers coming
back from World War One and they were dissociating. They
had whatever PTSD ends up being right, they had, they
were having these issues and so they wanted to study
what was going on with these people. By the way,
if you want to support my stream, you can do
so right there. If you wouldn't like and share, we
only got two hundred and eighty likes, seven hundred people watching.
If you want to support the stream, be shred to
do so through superchats as nobody celebrating their BTC gains.
I mean, if you want to support me by a bitcoin,
you can right here. Shout out to whoever sent one
hundred dollars in bitcoin the other day. Appreciate that, very
generous of you. You can support me there, or you
can support via superchats. But Wellington House, as we said,
was before we get to Tavistock. I wanted to mention
that the after World War One, what they decided they
wanted to do was focus on the nineteen thirty six
book by Oswald Spengler Decline of the West. Now, Spangler
wasn't writing what he thought was a He wasn't writing
some conspiracy plan. Spangler is a famous historian with a
kind of unique theory of history. As you guys may
or may not know, that history is characterized by these
world empires that have a life cycle. So you have
the Babylonian era of the ancient civilization society that was
characterized by a magian worldview. If you come to the
modern Western civilization of European man, Spangler characterized it as faustian,
meaning that that man in the West has a faustian
bargain and wants to control and dominate by technology. He's
not calling it even a bad thing. He's just talking
about his analysis of these phases of history. He says
that Western civilization has a life cycle of birth, an apex,
and then a decline, and he argued that the decline
would be marked by certain factors that were already kind
of going on in the nineteen thirties. And Spangler, by
the way, was not a fascist. I'm not sure why
people call him fascist. He was very critical of Tiny
Mustache Man, and Spangler is a very fascinating character. His
books are fascinating. We've talked about decline to the West
in the past, but one of the key things that
Spangler predicted, and he was not writing this for Tavistock,
had nothing to do with Tavistock. But he wrote a
famous book where he said that Western Man would be
his own worst enemy because eventually Western Man would allow
the importations, shall we say, of large foreign populations, who
would then take over his institutions and technology and subjugate
and destroy Western Man if you follow me. And that's
part of the thesis of Decline of the West and
other books. I think he has another book too, there's
a book about Prussian socialism, and then he's got a
book about essentially other people taking over our technology and
using it, if that makes sense. So that's kind of
a ongoing thesis in Spangler. Now, the Tavistock technocrats read
this and said, hey, that's a neat analysis and all,
but what if we utilize that as a strategy to
actually break the West and turn it into a socialist
world order, which is the only hope and salvation for man. Now,
this does not mean that capitalism is perfect, but this
is a move from an Enlightenment revolutionary philosophy of Adam
Smith's Laise fair stuff to the next phase of revolution,
which is way worse in my view. And as even
Spangler said, the famous quote you may have heard of it.
Spangler famously said, you cannot look behind any socialist movement
without finding some capitalists supporting it. In other words, if
you scratch a socialist, you'll find underneath, as you peel
away the layer monopoly capital support. That's a famous Spangler statement,
and Spangler's absolutely correct about that, and in fact, that
essentially is the modus operandi of the Fabian socialism that
the Tavasak Institute had as its modus operandi, as its
strategy and technique. So to all the Matt Walshes and
to all the daily wi and the normy conservatives who
think that there are no such things as long term
conspiracies or theory or techniques of subversion and control of
a society, the Tavisak Institute is the premier example of this. Admittedly,
as we will see, we are not just relying on
the claims of Coleman. We are going to the actual
texts of the history of it and the actual people
who work there with them to craft public opinion, to
crystallize public opinion others. I think Lippmann has another book
called The Crystallization of Public Opinion. Now, how does this work?
How do they do this? Well, one of the key
things they came up with was not just war propaganda
and doing a lot of you know, pioneering work in
that domain, and not just studying shell shock and you know,
individual trauma manipulation. We're going to get to more of
the specifics what are called future shocks. But they actually
came up with ideas about social justice in other words,
where does social justice warrior come from? Ultimately Tavistock. They
also came up with ideas like mass manipulation through public polling.
Now nowadays with the Internet, far fewer people care about polls,
and the younger that you get, the less people care.
But back in the nineteen twenties and thirties, and let's
see when was public opinion wrote so Lippmann wrote public
opinion in nineteen twenty. Now, Lipmann, we're talking about OSS
people out of the OSS here right at that time,
because people were very interested in groupthink. And by the way,
the Tavistock and put several publications out about groupthink, how
to engineer manufacturer group think. They understood that people wanted
to be with the winning side and the group and
not be an outsider. Right. That was much more normal,
I guess or commonplace in the nineteen twenties, thirties, forties
and fifties. Right, And so they could very easily just
make up poles lie in the polls, and you could
throw polling itself engineer public opinion and consent. In other words,
fifty five percent of Americans support going to Wall, and
then in next week it time's out out to the Atrocida.
Is seventy five percent of Americans now support going to wall.
Speaker 8: And the.
Speaker 6: Grandpa man voice on the radio telling you that seventy
percent of Americans support the war means that all the
good Americans are going to out support the war because
the fatherly grandpa voice on the radio told me that.
And I don't want to be an outsider. I want
to be a patriot and support my country. We got
to go to war, Grandpa radio voice told me, got
to go to war? Literally? Is that like that simple?
I mean, yeah, it's a whole book, but like the
basis of principle, is that just lie through statistics, lie
through polls. The polls don't even have to be real.
I mean, who in the nineteen fifties was going to
go check to see if the polls were real? Nobody?
People weren't. People were probably, I think, much more deferring
to authority at the time, and so they could get
away with a lot more back in these days as
they were making breakthroughs in social engineering and the public
had not caught on to any of this. Again, remember
the very first page of Burns's Propaganda, and Bernez is
one of these people working with these people. Remember we've
lectured through the entirety of Brenz's book many years ago, Propaganda,
And on the very first page, brene says, you think
you live in the democratic society where you make choices,
But all of your choices are given to you, and
your choices are manufactured for you, and your desires are
given to you and are controlled by an elite of
whom you've never heard and you don't know anything about. Now.
I don't think that Brene's was directly talking about the
quote illuminati. He's talking about the Tavistock Institute, the social
scientists and social engineers, working at Tavistock, people from the
Frankfurt School to pioneer psychological manipulation through advertising, public campaigns, polling, etc.
That's what he's talking about. He's talking about people like
Don Draper in Madmen as just one example. I'm not
saying Don Draper runs the illuminati, know what I'm saying.
Hopefully this we had a high IQ audience, right. Remember
Bill Gates was seen in that famous picture a few
years ago with the book How to Lie Through Statistics.
So this is a very well known, precise science. This
is not wack adoodle quack adoodle made up tenfold stuff.
This is all very easily verifiable. Walter Lippmann and Tavistock,
for example, came up with with Burnet's a term that
would help the Woodrow Wilson administration that convinced the American
population to be involved in the European foreign conflicts. Remember,
the founding fathers had an established attitude in America that
we would not be involved in European foreign conflicts. This
was weaponized when Wellington House and Tabs came up with
the idea of isolationism. Isolationism became a derogatory term when
prior to that was any think derogatory. It's just that's
the American attitude. It's America first, that was the attitude,
that was the model. But these people came up with
a very cunning strategy to attack and to demonize people
who would be America first. I'm talking about back in
the nineteen thirties, forties, et cetera, by saying that they
were callous, didn't care about the human rights in other countries,
they were insensitive to atrocities, et cetera, et cetera, all
the stuff that they had tested out in World War
One with attacking the Kaiser, the posters about the hunt H. G.
Wells's propaganda posters that he came up with that we've
covered in the past. And so social justice mans that
America take action and be involved in these campaigns. In fact,
the United States will champion and lead the charge according
to the Fabians in this just world order that they
want to establish. I'm not joking, that's from them. Tavastak
came up with the idea that in order for this
to be successful, we would need a long term plan
of what are called future shocks. These would be shocks
and tests to the system. This is not dead. By
the way, if you remember, I think even Klaus was
speaking this way not too long ago. Z And if
you listen to enough of these people and their lectures
and their talks, you'll hear them use this terminology quite often,
right shocks to the system, future shocks. In fact, one
of the global elite themselves, Alvin Toffler, wrote a whole
book called Future Shock that's Tavistock ideology. The idea was
that certain crisis, big scale crisis events, shock events are
the things that can propel this ideology in this game
plan forward large scale crises. That's why every almost every
global elite text that we lectured through many of them,
as you guys know, how do they always begin We
are in a crisis crisis christ They always begin the
same way. Whether it's Brazenski, whether it's Freethoff Copra, whether
it's HG. Wells, whether it's Charles Galton Darwin. The books
begin with we are in a crisis, human population, nukes,
blah blah blah. One of the things that they tested
out at Wellington House that was very effective in terms
of propaganda was get this to call the Kaiser the
Butcher of Berlin the Beast of the East come up.
They come up with these wild sort of almost like
like Trump tweets right, like sleepy Joe, right like the uh.
And And what's funny is that Coleman argues, and I
don't doubt this that when the United States wanted to
go after Saddam, they literally just copied and pasted everything
that that Wellington House had done with the Kaiser. And
guess what what do we see nowadays with all the
same types of propaganda. Asad is Hitler. Putin is Hitler, Hitler, Hitler.
Every look, Bob Woodward, Putin is the Hitler of our century.
Asad is Hitler. Like are you noticing a pattern? Like
so all you do is just slap the person that
you want to go after up with a Heatler, Right,
this is a just endless left tactic. They never get old,
they never get they never get tired to this. And
I mean, I don't care who you are, if you're
not a leftist by default, you're tiny mustache man. Asad
regime Assad is using is worse than Heatler. Assad is
using chemical weapons. Guess what that was all fake? You
remember when they admitted that Assad was not using chemical weapons?
On his own people. That was all made up. Oh
are you noticing a pattern here? The atrocities, the atrocities
against their own people, the butcher of Baghdad, Saddam Hussein.
And this works on the dumbed down, normy audience. Let's
see if we can find any old propaganda about Saddam.
Saddam Hussein is worse than Hitler. Saddam is Hitler. So
as you can see, Uh, this is a like literally
the lowest tier of propaganda, and they still use this.
It's kind of it's kind of wild, like they've never
they've never stopped using this. It never stops, and eventually
it becomes this It doesn't even have to make any sense.
Anyone who is not Mao is Hitler. You see, that's
the logic of the left here. And you could only
get to this kind of a situation with the long
term in depth brainwashing and social engineering that the Tavislak
Institute pioneer. Now other key members of the Tavislak Institute,
they utilize the Halford mckinder Heartland Rimland theory to be
the kind of guide for the Royal Institute for International
Affairs and the London University and London School of Economics.
In fact, we must have a world state to bring
in this world order is itself a phrase from Toynbee.
So Toynbee, the famous Fabian socialist British intellig I think
it was Verish intelligence, wasn't he. Historian and philosopher Old
Toynbee is one of the key figures working at Wellington,
and I think at Tavistock. So if you're looking for
key operators and thinkers and movers, Toynbee is definitely up
there with H. G. Wells and all these other characters
that we mentioned.
Speaker 11: H G.
Speaker 6: Wells's book The Open Conspiracy is a key text that
outlines the Tavistock Institute's plans. This is not for those
that don't know, and we've actually through this book for
many many years, over and over and over. This is
not a conspiracy book, you understand. This is a book
from the very people we're talking about, and it is
an admitted plan and strategy from a Fabian socialist working
with all of the people that we're talking about, right Ah,
she Wells. And the reason he calls it an open
conspiracy is that he says that we don't have to
hide this, there's no there's no need to make this
some kind of a secret thing. It's just simply reality
and it doesn't have to be hidden. Of course, my
my talk on this that never comes up even though wait,
no does it here? Here we go? Oh, it comes
up on some other person's channel and not my channel
of course. So this is really frustrating because you know,
so many of my talks are buried. You can't find
half of these anymore. Here we go. Amazingly, this one
comes up, so I think, yeah, so here is the
original talk. This was almost eight years ago. So we've
been talking about this book for eight years. This is
a half and half talk or partial talk. Now he
has another book that's equally as important, and well, actually
there's more than one god the Invisible King that Jamie
and I covered as another as she Wells book about
the coming world religion, and he has where's the other one?
It's called a New World Order. That one might be buried. No,
it's not. Amazingly, so here's me back when I had
Carba Bloat with a mustache. This is seven years ago.
Speaker 5: HG.
Speaker 6: Wells's book. Now again, I don't know why anybody at
this stage could or would think that what we're talking
about doesn't exist and is made up and is crazy talk,
when the actual most famous authors and writers of the
last century, we're part of the Fabian society working with Tavistock,
admittedly saying they want a nWo, admittedly talking about all
the stuff in their books, and then you insist it
doesn't exist, it's made up, and you're crazy. I'm not
talking about aliens, I'm not talking about Tartaria. I'm talking
about verifiable public information in books that really should settle
like there should be no debate, given the fact that
these are real texts and these people really are who
they say they are. But I would venture that I
would say, what do you think Ninety to ninety five
percent of the people who are awake have never heard
of these books, never read these books, don't know what
any of these things are about. Even though we've been
talking about this for almost ten years. The books are
not conspiracy books.
Speaker 8: HG.
Speaker 6: Wells was a high level freemason by admission atheist, socialist
technocrat who wants to depopulate in the family, have a
completely controlled, technocratic one world order and what's in Brave
New World. In nineteen eighty four is what they want explicitly,
end of debate. There is no debate about this. If
you're debating this at this point, this is your problem.
This is a U problem. So so far in the
Tavistot book, it looks like we're on the right track.
So far, We've got good information. And one little diddy
that I was surprised to see at the beginning of
the book was that because the UK was so envious
and hateful towards Germany, they were really looking for at
this Wellington House phase any ways, and means to destroy
and bring down Germany as a competitor to the Anglo
American establishment. And so they saw the need first informosts,
as we said, to control the newspapers, not just control
the newspapers, but to control education.
Speaker 11: And to.
Speaker 6: Essentially engineer the public through public polling and consent to
flip them to be pro war, not just in the UK,
but also eventually in the West and the United States. Now,
if you heard my lectures that we did in My
Life Talks, you know we went into detail about Colonel
Edwin mandel House and President Woodrow Wilson. Did you know
that the fourteen points was actually adopted from a Fabian
socialist book. The fourteen Points was the part of the
Fabian socialist model for a socialist world. Now, they didn't
get all of this at World War One and with
the League of Nations. The League of Nations ended up
being a failure, even though Colonel Edwin mandel House and
other Fabian socialist operatives working for Ralph Child were really
pushing to alter America and bring it back under quote
British Empire. Now, when people hear this, it doesn't mean
like the classical British Empire of you know, seventeen hundreds. No, no, no,
we're talking about a world federalist, socialist empire. That is
the model that John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes had. Okay,
So they realized with the waning of the British Empire
and with the rise of America and American Revolution all that,
et cetera, that they were not going to be able
to rebuild the British Empire as it had been in
its so called glory days. And so when you have
that early phase of Roads and Ruskin and people, they
were talking about the white Anglo Saxon man through evolution
being destined to dominate the planet. Okay, that's true, that
is accurate. They did say that, and they had a
Darwinian Malthusian worldview even then, and it was connected to
the idea of the specific Anglo Saxon breed and stock
of people. However, this changes as we begin to have
the assent of the Fabian socialist model, which agrees with
a lot of what the prior model had, but they
do not share anything to do with anything pro white man.
The Fabian socialst model says, no, no, it's not going
to be a race or breed of people. That is
the future. We're going to select specific elite members of
any group, it doesn't matter. They will be the leaders
of the future. They have to be atheistic, technocratic, et cetera,
et cetera. That's why George Bernard Shaw on the the
future people in the movement I'm talking about, has a
famous quote where he says, when we get the technocratic
order in place, you'll have to come to us, the
priests class technocrats, and you'll have to convince us why
we should let you live, because we have a mandate
for the good of the survival the human race to
mass dpop literally and he says. So remember this flips
in terms of attitude from Ruskin Rhodes time away from
quote Anglo saxon Man dominance to anti human attitude, only
socialist technocrat dominance. They get rid of all of the
race elements. This is partly why tiny mustache Man is
part of the dialectical system that they want to destroy.
I'm not saying tiny mustache Man was good. I'm saying
that that was an older model that these people had discarded.
And in fact, if you read the Rawtu book, the
The Fabian Socialist, whether it's eventually Bertrand Russell the webs,
I forget he mentions. I know Bernard Shaw says it,
but some of the other keys they actually say that, no, no,
this model is wrong. In order to get advancement for
the socialist order, we will actually have to destroy honky Man.
You catch my drift. So this attitude changes, and that
attitude continues into the model of Tavistock and the technocrats.
That is what dominates still to this day. For example,
General Wesley Clark famously said Europe will have to be destroyed.
I'm not saying that General Wesley Clark had some criticisms
of the neocons. Okay, wow, great, that's great. There's a
seven nations plank. Yeah, wow, that's true. That's great. Yeah,
but he also is a proponent ultimately of this technocratic,
fabian socialist agenda. Thank you, guys for those super chats.
Appreciate that. Thank you so much, AC for that big
fat super chat. Of course, it looks like AC is
gonna win. But hey, maybe you guys can top him,
or you can equal it out. I know a lot
of people had some BTC celebrations today. We did hit
at h a minute ago. Did we pull back a
little bit for we're all waiting for we're hovering around
ninety two five, okay, okay, okay, okay, we're all waiting
for things to pop off, to hit one hundred k. Anyway,
and as you may understand, you probably are aware. Yes,
it is precisely this era of wood Wilson, Colonel Awamandel
House where we get the Federal Reserve, absolutely and we
begin to get Marxist ideas such as the income text.
And if you doubt that, are you not familiar with
the planks of the Communist Manifesto. One of them is
the Fiat Central Bank abolition of the family inheritance tax.
Here it is the planks of the communist manifesto at
is very beginning. Thank you with that. I appreciate that. Now,
remember do not misunderstand what I'm saying here. What guy
is wildly wrong? I'm wrong? You want to come on
in debate where I'm wrong. I'm literally at Marxist dot org.
Abolition of private property, a heavy and progressive income tax,
abolition of inheritance. These are planks of the communist manifesto.
Free education in public schools, Communist manifesto. So you can
see some examples. Centralization of bank and credit in the
hands of the state. Guess what. Ultimately that's the private
federal reserve. You see who's I'm wrong or who's wrong?
I want that? Got to come to bate me. I mean,
we're looking at the this is the Marxist communist manifesto.
Now we're not fighting classical Marxists, because the Fabians are
reformed Marxists who wanted to align a softer socialism with
monopoly capital. So, in other words, a liberal economic elite
was much more effective than these hardcore extreme policies that
marx wanted right away through the proletari rising up and
bloody revolution is seasing the means of production. That didn't happen.
It's not going to happen. And so the Fabian said,
we want a gradual, slow kill model using money.
Speaker 5: And even HG.
Speaker 6: Wells, if you guys remember I don't remember if it's
it's either his New World Order book or up in Conspiracy,
where HG. Well says to Marxist of his day, he says,
you Marxists are stupid, He said, do you not realize
that the only way the nWo will be built is
through capital? He says that, don't worry. Let the capitalist
elite build the infrastructure of a global order. We will
then take it over. Not in a one day bloody
revolution where the factory workers stop printing the funkal pops
and they rise up and kill the CEO. No, We're
going to wait until they build it, and we will
gradually through permeation and penetration, the long march to the institutions.
As Graham she said, we'll take it over and our
allies will be And here's the big secret. Have always
been big capital. Remember Spangler was correct when he said
you can never search scratch below the surface of a
socialist movement without finding mega capital behind it. This is
the thing that we can never get across to the
Norman Conservatives. Normy conservatives cannot understand this. They will not
understand this. This is one of the roadblocks to anything
actually ever changing. In order for things to actually ever change,
we have to get the right to understand these points
that it is not just the boobs in Washington, the
idiots in Washington, doom booms and Joe Biden's it's not
idiocy that's importing millions of people. It's a strategy. And
by the way Coleman said in the nineteen nineties, that's
exactly what they would do. Large scale importation, change the demographics,
boom with a gigantic underclass, easily turn this nation into
a socialist country. It's not a rocket science. It's pretty obvious.
A gigantic dependent underclass that's imported on the teet of
the Nanty state makes the whole country eventually socialist by design.
It is not just boobs in Washington. And why can
we not get the right to understand this? Why is
this so difficult? It's like, it's so obvious if you
actually read the actual people. Arnold Toynbee wrote, I already
took down the Toynbee so now I got to get
this book because this book sounds crazy. Toynbee says, quote,
if we are to avoid mass unliving, he means self
that humanity will destroy itself. We must have a world state. Now.
It must not have a democratic form to begin with.
We must build the world state. Now. That is one
of the most important ideologues of the last century. Arnold
Toynbee himself. I have his was It History? There's a C.
Wells's Outlines of History, and then Toynbe has another offic
Toynbee's book. But one of the key figures that we're
talking about here in the British socialist empire saying we
must have this. Thus, with the advent of Wellington House
that was funded originally by the British monarchy and later
by Rockefeller in Rothshaw, we would begin to have the institute,
the think tank that would be the seed for which
the world would be converted into a world socialist order.
And to get back to the character of Bruce Lockhart,
we are speaking of this famous British operative because I'll
mention just this brief section that he talks about, and
again this is actually correct because I have his memoirs.
This is corroborated. We often hear of what Sutton talked
about right in Wall Street of the Bullstreet Revolution about
the support. Now, apparently I haven't checked this because I've
never read Churchill and I'm not a Churchill. I think
Churchill was a stewoge essentially of the same people. But
apparently Churchill at what point said I gotta figure out
where this is. Maybe this is in his He does
mention a Churchill book at the end. I've never read Churchill,
so I don't know which one it.
Speaker 8: Is, but.
Speaker 6: He mentions Winston Churchill's book. I don't remember which one.
I don't see it. But anyway, Churchill apparently says the
transportation of Lenin Vladimir Lenin in a sealed truck like
a plague vasilis from Switzerland into Russia established Lenin and
Trotsky enabled them to seize Russia by the hair of
its head. So Churchill was actually admitting and alluding to
the importation of Lenin and Trotsky secretly into Russia via
this train, and that they had a bunch of gold
given to them, millions of dollars in the sealed trainer
truck transport of Lenin and his Bolshevik revolutionaries into the
midst of from war turn Europe into Russia to deposit
them to import their revolution, which was not the Russian Revolution,
but was actually exported to Russia when I was privileged
to actually study at Wellington House.
Speaker 11: This is.
Speaker 6: Coleman's claim. I was reading through Arnold Toynbee's papers, I
found then Bruce Lockhart's private papers, which led me to
the conclusion that without Toynbee, Bruce Lockhart and British intelligence,
and without the complicity of at least five European nations,
the Romanov's would not have fallen to the Bolsheviks. And
by the way, Sutton says the exact same thing in
his chapter on David Lloyd, George Lord Milner and Lord
Milner using Bruce Lockhart as the go between to the Bolsheviks.
This account must of necessity be limited to Tavistock's participation
in this affair. It will not be a complete account
of the skullduggery because, according to Milner's private papers, Lord
Milner his aids through Tavistock were contacted through a fellow
named Fritz Plattin Fritz Platten was a famous socialist. Milner
was a leading Fabian, and although he eventually ended up
scorning Sydney and Beatrice web, they were all still working
on the same team. It was Fritz Platten who planned
the logistics of the trip that oversaw the arrival of
the revolutionaries to Petrograd. This was confirmed and borne out
by the vinnaim Strasse files of which I was able
to gain access. These files were open to certain people
allowed to read them. They tallied very closely with Bruce
Lockhart's account in his private papers, as well as what
I was able to read from Lord Elli, Alfred Milner
and the Betrayal of Russia. Now I remember Sutton says
the exact same thing in his book on this, naming
all the same people in the exact same account. It
appears that Milner had many contacts amongst the Bolsheviks in
addition to Lennon. In fact, it was to Lord Milner
that Lennon went when he needed money for the revolution.
Arned with a letter of introduction from Fritz Platten, Lennon
met with Lord Milner and laid down his plan for
the overthrow of the Romanovs and Christian Russia. Eventually, to
seal the deal, Milner agreed on condition that he could
send his agent, Bruce Lockhart of I six to oversee
and supervise day to day affairs and how Lennon was
handling the job. Lord Ralphchild and the Rockefellers demanded that
they be allowed to send Sidney Riley. Sidney Riley, did
you hear what I said? All of this seems to
line up with all the other research and stuff that
I've talked about, and I am looking forward actually to
reading doctor Richard Spence's book on Sidney Riley. Now I
have a mainstream normy book on Sidney Riley, but I
guarantee you that doctor Spencer's book is going to have
the actual details. In other words, if you really want
to understand the last century and what all was going down,
you got to read Quigley's text in Toto. You have
to read the raw Tu book, and you have to
go into these famous spies. You've got to go into
the Bruce Lockheart memoirs. And although I've not rap read
some of those, haven't read the whole thing yet. You
have to go through these rare texts like Trust No.
One The Secret World of Sidney Riley by doctor Richard
Spence whom we've interviewed. Sam Richard Spence that wrote the
book Secret Agents sixty sixty six about Crowley. Now did
you catch that Coleman accurately here mentions Ralph Child and
the rock Fillers demanded that they be allowed to send
Sidney Riley to also supervise the transfer of Russia's natural
resources and the gold that were held in the Central
Bank of Moscow. Lennon agreed to this, allegedly, and then
Trotsky as well. To seal the bargain. Lord Milner, on
the behalf of Ralph, gave Lennon sixty million pounds of gold.
The Rockefellers then contributed forty million pounds of gold. Countries
in complicity with this and the sealed train of affair
were Great Britain, Germany and Finland, Switzerland and Sweden. US, however,
was not directly involved at this time. However, at the
orders of President Wilson. It was This is where you
get Wilson granting a a passport through Fritz Plottin through
German espionage operatives to Trotsky. The Wilhemstrassa files confirmed that
the carriage was remained locked. No one was able to
board the carriage without Fritz Plottin's permission. The train would
have extra territorial status. Passports were not to be checked,
tickets would be bought at regular prices, there would be
no security issues. And if you remember, Sutton has a
whole chapter where he talks about the Wilson administration getting
Trotsky or Lenin or Trotsky their their files and passports
so that they could do all this. So one hundred
million dollars in gold was the price of the bullshit revolution.
Now why would they want that? Well, if you remember,
the revolution in Russia was actually run out of one
of the basically a block of New York that the
Rockefellers owned, And we've detailed this the whole The Sutton
book covers the entire history what each department and building
of that Rockefeller complex was doing. They're literally running the
Russian Revolution out of this building you see, out of
New York. So it's run out of New York. A
lot of different individuals, entities, corporations, people, family banks contribute.
And why do they do this because Russia has some
of the most valuable resources on the planet. And this
was the creation of a whole new capital market. If
the revolution is successful, if there's a destruction of Russia,
and if the Western capitalist elites are supporting the revolution,
then Western companies and corporations who are bought into this
pay to play can come in and loot the place.
It's not that sophisticated. It's fancy with all these fronts
and shells and this and that is just causing a
disturbance and looting a country. That's all it is. And
that's really what modern warfare is, destroying and looting and
then rebuilding and making the people that you conquered pay
for it. It's not that sophisticated. It's literally just warfare
and subterfuse to take shit. That's it at its most
basic level. Now, to get back to Tavistok, Tavasak had
not only pioneered studies. Now remember they got their start
through a gigantic grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockfeller
Foundation's giant grant is the significant money that facilitated the
creation of what we know of as Tavistock. Now, remember,
at this time, it's just Tavistock Clinic, which becomes Tavistack Institute.
This expands to be a multi tiered facility places all
over the UK, and it eventually becomes the spearhead of
you Got It trn Z movement in fact, the last
ten years. If you're wondering where all this came from,
do you think it just popped out of nowhere? Suddenly
Bruce Gender is on the cover of Sports Illustrator or
does anybody read Sports Illustrator even know that exists? But
Woman of the Year Bruce Gender? What where does this
come from? Do you think that it just all sprang
out of nowhere? No, it's not one damn thing after another.
A lot of things are strategized and planned far more
than what the normy conservatives think. We don't even consider.
The normy liberals are not even they're out to lunch.
They don't even they can't think. The normy conservatives can
at least think. But they're so arrogant and delusional and
prideful that they cannot admit that evil strategizes and plans.
I don't understand how they. I mean, every normally conservative will.
Speaker 12: Have these fetishes about I love to study, you know,
I love to study the techniques and tactics of D
Day and Normandy and the invasion, and to twenty three
thousand tanks at this day, the forty three thousand troops.
Speaker 6: Were over here. They all the stupid shit about things
of specifics of World War two, but they can't figure
out that strategizing happens at a bigger level than a war.
Speaker 5: Did.
Speaker 6: The strategy in the aspionage just quit after the war.
And yet the mainstream media has said for seven years
that Russia has conspired for many, many years to subvert
our elections and to control our country. And all I
saw today on Twitter in the Norman I looked, I
looked briefly at the Normy sphere. Do you know what
they're all saying, literally all saying, Tulsi Gabbard is a
Russian agent. She was cultivated by Russia, just like no evidence.
They just say, because she doesn't want to continue the policies,
she's a Russian operative, an agent. It's just ridiculous. No,
Norman Conservatives, not every thing is planned, we don't go
full Skitzo. But far more is planned than what you think.
And it's precisely the reality of large scale espionage. Let's
call it you want to call it espionage? Is that
better for you? Is that more acceptable to you? Because publicly,
according to mainstream media, the spearhead of the TRA and
Z movement for the last decade or more has been Tavastok.
They had the largest clinic in the world. About this,
do you think it's accidental that it's all the same
goblins I'm talking about that are behind this clinic. I mean,
it's like in your face, dummies, What is wrong with you?
What is the major malfunction to where you can't see
this when it's right in your face? Admitted in mainstream news.
In fact, it was so egregiousous, as Jack Sparrow says
that two years ago they had to shut all this
stuff down because they were just openly trying to brainwash
youths into snipping off peepees. I mean, it would take
you two seconds to look up on the internet the
hub of t R A n Z stuff from the establishment.
It happens to be Tavasak. Hello, you can't figure this out? Well,
mconomic consup doesn't exist. I don't want to be a
turnfoil hut. It literally takes you two seconds to look
up Tavistock gender, The foremost clinic in the world had
to shut down over this. Now I wonder where and
how they came up. Why would the Tavasak Institute be
involved in this? Hmm hmm. What does this go along with?
Are there any other ideologies that this links up with,
like depopulation like that kind of stuff.
Speaker 10: So so far.
Speaker 6: We've seen Coleman, even when he's making speculations or claims
that we can't exactly verify, he's pretty much so far
doing good like he's I'd say he's eighty percent pretty
much right. So far, we haven't seen anything that's totally
hard to believe or whatever. And he points out that
one of the things that they studied early on Tavistock
in the nineteen twenties, I guess it was still Wellington
House or whatever. Let's see what year is Tavistock forty seven.
Tavastok Clinic becomes Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in nineteen
forty seven, So the clinic becomes this more of a
think tank at this point, And how does it become
so powerful? Well, not just Rockefeller, but you'll notice, according
to the public record, giant corporations begin to be interested
in their research. We have a meta bad manufacturing shell Bayer,
Glacier Metals, Una Lever, the National Coal Board start contracting
and utilizing research from the Tavasak Institute. So you understand
this is growing into a corporate level entity that is
used or consulted or contracted out to do research. So
maybe shell Shell Oil says hey Tavastock, we want to
create a much broader consensus and community amongst our customers.
What are the techniques of groupthink and cult behavior literally
that we might utilize to create that for our market share?
And Tavastok says, let us go to work on that
for you. You see the CIA, says Tavastock. We want
to study PTSD in soldiers coming back. I don't know,
I'm just speculating and throwing out things that are probably
the case. We want to study PTSD and soldiers that
came back from Iraq. Ah. Yes, we'll do that. We
have decades of research on PTSD. Us, let us do
that for you. So this is what we're talking about.
Corporations entities say we want to create a new market
for example of here's one for you. And I'm just
throwing this out, but I guarantee something like this happened.
Let's say you're what's the big makeup companies, Cephora or Mabelene,
I don't know, whatever makeup companies are. Makeup company says,
how do we create a new market? Well, right now,
half of the population uses makeup, the women. What if
we can sell the idea that the other half of
the population it's cool and trendy and gender affirming and safe.
It's a safe space for dudes to wear makeup. And
Jeffrey Charlls is promoted to the top of everything for years.
Why is he Why because there's a vested interest that
certain companies have. We're just talking about the money level.
We're not talking about the big social ends, just the
money level. Okay, wouldn't Sephora do well if the other
half of the population potentially now is going to start
wearing makeup on a large scale? Of course, and that's
exactly what they did. The large makeup companies literally start
putting men in their ads wearing makeup tr n Z stuff.
So just at the money level, normally is out to
be able to figure that out, even though they can't.
But beyond the money level, there's a deeper agenda at
work exactly exactly, dudes at Sephora full on dressed like ladies. Exactly.
What was study? Here's the thing. What was studied is
something I told you about a few streams ago in
the nineteen twenties was the Many sex revolution in the
nineteen twenties. Did you know in the nineteen twenties there
was a mini sex revolution. Now, and you might think this,
this is not for this time. This was a huge deal.
So in the roaring twenties there was this Many sex revolution, which,
by the way, Tavistock promoted and was studying and wanted.
There was a many free love thing going on in
the nineteen twenties. The women started moving their dresses up
and so to have and show your leg an inch
or two above the knee was like scandalous, right, So
this image right here, this kind of stuff, and this
was in a lot of the movies at the time,
and not like that. To drink alcohol this is I
didn't actually realize that until I was reading this book.
In the nineteen twenties, women drinking alcohol in public was
seen as scandalous. Now, I mean, just like the stuff
that we think is scandalous is like nothing compared to
what the nineteen twenties thought was scandalis now. I'm not saying,
by the way, that we have to go back to
the nineteen twenties or we I mean, I think some
of this is a little bit ridiculous. But wherever on
the scale or the spectrum you think it is, like
in terms of ridiculousness, I don't think it's that big
of a deal of a woman has a drink in public.
That's kind of ridiculous to me. And a skirt being
an inch above the knee, I mean, come on, But
for the time, that was seen as revolutionary, you see. So,
regardless of what the actual right standard is, if you
think about it in terms of social engineering, these people
are studying how this works and how this affects people
at that time for or where they want to take
the revolution in the future, you see. So the little
revolutions are being studied to push the envelope in the
next ten to twenty thirty forty years. That's the way
by design. Explicitly, the Fabian socialists, we're thinking this is
also and I haven't proven this, but I'm pretty sure
this is where the it girl comes from. So I
think the first it girl was Clara Bow, right, and
they realized back at this time, let's see, yeah, we
could control society, not just through this goofy you know
news stuff where the newsman comes on it. So a
Shanta a Mark, I'm support the wall. That's time to
go to the wall, Bolly, and then everybody wants to
go to war. Well, much more effective than Grandpa Radio
voice would be the babes of the time, like Clara Bo.
If Clara Bow bobs her hair and smokes cigarettes and
bops around and whatever she does in her little flapper stuff,
that's way more effective for social engineering because now all
the girls want to be like Clara Bo. The social
engineering of the star. You see the celebrity of the star.
And then all the girls are suddenly acting and dressing
like Clara Bow. And this is so powerful, especially for women.
It's kind of crazy, right, and they're not going to
pick ugly people. You had Clara Bow and then Joan Crawford,
who becomes basically one of the most iconic, hugest Hollywood
women of all time. Right, she follows suit. She becomes
the it girl. She's icon of Hollywood and all kinds
of crazy stuff for the next several decades. And I mean,
I have to admit, she is very talented actress. I'm
not hating on Joan Crawford. I think she's pretty just
from a talent standpoint, like she's pretty, pretty wild just
as an actress. But the social engineering is pretty much
next level. You also get this with what's her face.
I can't stand Betty Davis. I can't stand Betty Davis.
Her movie Suck Too seem like one good Betty Davis movie,
same situation. She's also it girl at the time, flapper,
all this kind of stuff back in the early twenties thirties,
and I think, by the way, she became a witch
for her daughter. I think, so she became a witch,
which is crazy, not surprising. But my point is that, Okay,
so even in the nineteen tens twenties, with these early
it girls, they are being studied for the manufacturing and
engineering of social revolution. And he argues that, oh, by
the way, this is also prior to the Hayes Code.
You guys remember this. So if you watch, for example,
a movie like Rain with Joe Crawford, which is one
of the it's one of the most famous early I
think it's her most famous early film. This is really
scandalous because in the movie in nineteen thirty two, she
plays a prostitute on an island who has these long
arguments with this Puritan minister and it's really like the
film is like degraded quality, but it's a very famous,
you know, old school Hollywood thirties film. This was really
edgy for the time. But the weird part was that
this is right prior to the Hayes Code, so they
could actually almost do pretty much rate I would say
rated R stuff and maybe even a little bit of
nudity at this time in movies especially. This was right
after silent pictures, so this is like the beginning of
the talkies. But then the Hayes Code comes in, and
the Hayes Code was intended to counteract this kind of
stuff in the movies, and I think the Hayes Code
was largely promoted by Catholics. It was in effect from
nineteen thirty four to nineteen sixty eight. So notice that
date nineteen sixty eight, right in the middle of the
sixties unterercultural sexual revolution. You get the removal the Hayze Code.
And I mean, look, it was definitely better under the
Hayze Code. But I mean there's some really ridiculous stuff,
like the Haze Code would like you couldn't have a
kiss on screen. It's like what And like if you
had a bedroom you had to portray this is where
we get the two beds, right, two beds. That's kind
of weird. So, I mean it was it was a
little too far on the Puritan side, but way definitely
in the right direction of today rare Catholic win exactly.
I mean definitely we rather have the Haze Code than
like Rocky Horror or any of this kind of garbage. Yes,
rare Catholic win there. But point being is that they
were studying, according to Coleman, and I think it's probably correct,
the sex elements of the Silent era film stars, and
this was before the Hayes Code. And this is when
they could get away with a lot more. By the way,
if you've seen the movie Babylon with Mario, Robbie and
Brad Pitt, was actually a really good movie about the
history of Hollywood. The beginning of the movie when they're
doing the silent pictures is pre Hayes Code, and that's
why you see them doing all this kind of crazy stuff,
because you're like, how could they do this crazy stuff
in the nineteen tens and twenties, Well, that's because they
didn't have laws about this yet. Now moving on to
the key characters of the phase of Tavistock proper, when
we get these research units and they start setting up
units that deal with all kinds of stuff. All the
way up until today, the units are for example, it
says human resources, so I would venture that human resources
itself probably comes out of Tavistock. Just the whole idea
of human resources is probably a Tavistock invention, Human Resource Center,
Center for Applied Social Research, Institute for Operational Research, British
Operational Research Society. Now a lot of this sounds really boring,
but what they're doing is literally giving corporations the structure
that corporations have. So for example, when you go to
a company and they have an HR manager and it's
some big, old fat bitch who's talking to you about
you being a racist, that's from Tabstat. When you go
to the grocery store and there's a employee of the month,
that's from Tavistock. The military they contract to Tavistock how
can we get our special forces units to have more
group think and less independent action. Tavistock, all of this,
it's all tabasas. Now, keep in mind this also kind
of bursts the bubble of the libertarian versus government dialectic
because Tavistock is one in percent united with the corporations
and they're one in percent united with the British government
the US government. So there's no either or here. This
is a public private type of entity what Coleman calls,
I think correctly, the world's foremost brainwashing entity. So who
are some of the key figures? Some of these you
probably heard of, some of the most important outstanding figures
of the earlier phase this or I guess you say
middle phase of Tavistock when we're getting getting into the
nineteen forties, fifties, sixties. Many of them are mentioned here.
Let's see he mentions doctor Kurt Lewin, who is also
Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School overlap Major General John Rawlings Rees.
Whenever we did this previous talk which I can't find
on or what it is, we covered John Rawlings reees
extensively HV. Dix And who is HV.
Speaker 5: Dix?
Speaker 6: Well, he just happens to be the author of the
official academic History of Tavistock. W. R. Bayon, who has
countless tabstock public publications. Margaret Meade, Margaret me the famous
fraudster woman, wife of doctor Gregory Bateson of m k
Ultra fame. So notice now we're having overlap with mk
Ultra through doctor Gregory Bateson, Margaret Mead, the famous noble
savage person. Remember did you know?
Speaker 7: Do you?
Speaker 6: Are you aware that it turns out that Margaret Meade
was a fraud. She was faking stuff, her research on
Indigenous peoples and all that. It was all just gibberish.
It's all fake, noble savage, all this stuff that Margaret
me was pushing, that was all blunt. Well, she's out
of Tavistank and her husband, Gregory Bateson, is out of Tavistok.
But these are the same people who go on, as
we said, to create Michigan University's Institute for Social Research.
And what do we get from the ISR Critical studies
critical theory Critical race theory.
Speaker 13: Critical race theory is an academic field focused on the
relationships between.
Speaker 6: Shut up, Siri, hush, I didn't ask you anything Okay,
you see this giant, menacing Soviet looking concrete block entity
that we covered the other night. Institute for Social Research,
Why yes, it is everything evil and as menacing as
you would expect. And we looked up the year history
anniversary interview with the ISR. Now, remember this is at
the university level, and this is university goblins pushing all
their university stuff, which is usually where the goblins are.
The Frankfurt School and the Tavasak Institute. They permeate and
penetrate institutions, including academia. And this goes on to talk about, oh, yes,
we were set up to push things like Adorno's Frankfurt
School critical theory and that leads to critical race theory.
So when you hear all this stuff about critical this,
critical that, and they're talking about hobbor Ma, yes, Horkheimer, Adorno,
all the Frankfurt School people, Hollar Moss Institute for Social Research,
and why were these people important? This is just a
recap a little bit of what we talked about last time.
Because who aligned themselves with the Frankfurt School, the CIA
and its predecessor, the OSS. Is that a conspiracy theory?
No Bertrand Russell talked about it openly. In fact, we
found this academic guys gigantor there's almost a book.
Speaker 1: Is this it?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 3: This isn't it?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 7: This is it?
Speaker 6: Let's see, No, that's not it. There's another guy wrote
like a massive book length level thing on this that
we looked at the other night. But regardless, we'll just
go to straight from the mouth of the establishment Foreign
Affairs magazine reporting on a book that was published. I
should get this book, by the way, the Frankfurt School
at War, the Marxists who helped explain the Nazis to
the OSS, to the CIA, Franz Neumann, Herbert marcusa Otto
Kerkheimer War makes for strange bedfellows. Among the oddest peering
is the World War two production that was the bringing
together of while Bill Donovan, the head of the OSS,
precursor of the CIA, and the German Jewish Marxists that
helped the United States understand and combat tiny mustache Man,
the OSS and CIA together with the frank For School. Okay,
so all these academics have nothing to do with conspiracies.
It's all academic literature. Now briefly here before we get
into the Tavistock studies of what they call three system
response to stress. Three system response to stress. I wanted
to look through the official history of Tavistock according to
one of its Tavistock luminaries HV. Dix, and we're gonna
just look and see who all is referenced as being
directly connected to and having a relationship with Tavistock officially.
Maybe Coleman is making all this up. It's maybe it's
not true. Now, remember this book was printed in nineteen
seventy but was obscure and was reprinted in twenty fifteen,
so it was really difficult to check up on a
lot of this material unless you had access to a
large library with a lot of research material, or you
could find this book prior to nineteen fifteen. But as
we go through the text, we find that the Carnegies
are mentioned in play a very important role. So the
Carnegie Endowment that has a direct connection the British government
absolutely has a direct, important connection to Tavistock. The famous
genetics I think it is a geneticist Hans isinc And
he's famous because I think he lost an award recently
because he is a eugenicist. German British psychologist Hans Isinc.
He's a famous he won some award, I'm trying to
remember it, and they took it back because someone found
some place where he was talking about racism. And so
even if you're in the establishment and you push the
establishment positions are the controversial, Hans isainc and guess what
he says that so can you can you guess what
he says it's so controversial. Now I'm not saying he's
a good person, but he dared to say that there's
a correlation between various ethnic groups and IQ. There you go,
that's it. That's enough to get you losing your rewards
from the establishment nowadays. Anyway, Hans Isaac had a key
role connected to Tom Sock, the Josiah Macy and the
Macy Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Ford Funishment, the World
Health Organization. Rudolph hes Interesting. Why would Rudolph hes be
related to tough Well, Tabostock actually was very interested in
the propaganda of Hesse and the tiny mustache men entities.
They don't believe the story of tiny mustache men and
the propaganda, but they're interested in the techniques. That's why
studies about hypnotism Oh, interesting, the Institute of Child Psychology.
Institute of Child Psychology. Oh you mean, yeah, to push
gender affirming care. You see the history of IQ and
intelligence studies. Now, I'm not saying that all IQ intelligent
studies are wrong, but that information can be studied and
used for various purposes. Carl Jung, did you know Carl
Jung had a deep important connection to Tavistock And if
you remember, Carl Jung was a member of what intelligence agency?
He's agent four eight eight. Yes, Carl Jung was a
member of the OSS and he reported and his documents
are public where he him and Alan Dallas. So what
I'm trying to say, their communicators back and forth are public.
And so No, Carl Jung was not a a lot
of people thought Carl Jung works for a tiny mustache
man because he talks about archetyps. No, he was in
direct contact with Alan Dallas and worked for the OSS.
He even had a name agent for eighty eight Kurt
Lewin of the Frankfort School, the London School of Economics
Marital studies. Interesting. What are some of the courses and
lectures at Tavistot Child Psychology Understanding clergy, medical practitioners, magistrates,
marital studies, studying the public, social workers, studying statistics, trade unions,
war neuroses, studying teachers. So you can see that they're
interested in all areas of society. Edward Mappither, Now that's it.
The only reason that name caught my attention, Edward Mappither,
is because do you know what famous celebrity is named Mapither?
That is a quiz question for the audience, Royal College
of Psychiatrists. Edward Mappither. I'm just playing around right now,
just checking out. Wouldn't it be funny?
Speaker 1: Ah?
Speaker 6: So he studied shell shock for them, and guess what,
Not only was I a member of the Eugenics Society,
and not only did he provide a Bobo's for women,
he was also skittles as basically, all these people are what. Yes,
our famous celebrity named Mappither is Tom kun Let's see,
is this guy related to Tom Cruise. Tom Cruise's real
name is William Mappither. I think he's like William Mappither
the third. That's it the way, that's his brother, that's
the cousin. Tom Cruise's name is Thomas Cruise Mappither the fourth,
So he's he's from a long line of Mapithers. I'll say,
so his cousin is this dude never, I don't know
who that is anyway, I don't know if he's related
to that British dude. I was just screwing around. What
else comes up in key areas? Uh, this is just
I'm just doing a survey here of elements that overlap
with the history of personality assessment studies. And by the way,
the person assessment studies, if you don't know, they're actually
part of m k ULTRA. So a lot of these
studies and research is also, by the way, directly part
of m k LDRUP, the personality assessment system. I think
that I found an old journal, a journalistic entry in
a magazine written by John Marx that wrote the m
Kiltra book. He has a separate piece that he wrote
in the nineteen eighties about the history of the personality
assessment and that's actually connected to studies that Abraham Maslow
did for mk ULTRA. Very few people know that, but
the reason that they wanted these personality studies. It's right.
So when people start telling you, I'm in, I am
I n F I'm an I MTJ, I'm a TMI,
I'm an opp whatever whatever all those that's actually from
m Kltrup. So next time somebody trusts to classify you
say you can't classify me with your gay ultra stuff.
I don't fit your category. Bro, I ain't in no category.
I know I n T i't a know TNA. I'm
in a TNA category. Psychoanalysis, Jungian psychoanalysis, Freudian psychoanalysis, public
relations studied at a very large level, John Rowlings Reeve's
key character, key figure, working groups, group therapy, group studies, groupthink, psychosomatics, studies,
sex abuse in kid studies, social psychiaty, so every just
studying every kind of social domain you could even think of,
shell Shock, Sigmund Freud, Royal Society, Rockefeller Foundation, Eric trist Unesco,
World Health Organization. So, according to the mainline history of
Tavistock by Tavistock member HV. Dix, one of the key
figures and characters so far, pretty much every major character, entity, organization,
idea has been studied is part of Tavistock and is correct.
Doesn't mean everything that Coleman says is correct. He might
be speculating in areas and going a little too far
here and there. But again I'm gonna say so far
we're about eighty percent accurate. I think that's a fair level.
And again, I've read all the Wells books that we're
talking about. I've read the Burnet's propaganda texts, and that
all lines up exactly with what he claims. So let's
see next up. Okay, we covered all that. We covered
the Bolsheviks, Sidney Riley, Bruce Lockhart, we covered all that.
Tavistock basically is the prior instantiation of also something akin
to the Rand Corporation. Now, if you don't know about
Rand Corporation, I've done a lecture on the official History
of Rand Corporation by Alex Abaya, and Rent Corporation is
very similar to I'm sure many of the same people
from Tavistock also have worked at Rand and vice versa,
so a lot of these things, it's similar stuff. If
you would like to watch my mini doc that I
made six years ago on Rand, you can watch it
right there. But I think I have a separate talk,
or maybe this mini doc is the talk. I don't remember.
I've done so many of these things for so many years.
We got a talk we hear with Burmas. So I
did a whole breakdown with Burmas of the Rand Corporation
book by alex Obeya. And I did that because if
you remember, back in the day Lord Voldemort, I did
a sit down, linky interview with alex Obeya. You could
probably find them a rumble or something. But alex Obeya
went pretty deep in the book in terms of what
he admits. I'm sure it wasn't everything because it was
an official history of Rand Corporation by alex Obeya. But
I did read the whole book and we did lecture
through it. It is considered one of our globally texts
because it is an official from the Rand Corporation allowing
alex Obeya in to.
Speaker 11: Do it.
Speaker 6: The book is called Soldiers of Reason. This is an
interview with alex Obea after he had written the book
and published it. Here's other people talking about how Rain
Corporation created the American strategy. Basically, it's the brains behind
the Cold War, it's the brains behind Obamacare, It's the
brains behind how they transition America into a service economy
out of an industrial economy. That's all admitted in the book,
Rank Corporation came up with how to sell war Desert Storm.
They came up with the idea to live film and
live stream the Gulf War, which was one of the
first times that had been done. It had been the
first videoed war was Vietnam, but the first live cast
was I think the first Desert Storm. That's all covered
in the book. Let's see a little bit of clip
of this.
Speaker 11: I'm the author of Soldiers of Reason, Corporation and the
Rights of the American Empire. The Rank Corporation is the
most important thing tank in the history of the world,
and its scientists and its theories have changed the way that.
Speaker 6: We look at the world and the way I think
Rank Corporation is definitely out. They're probably equal to I
think Aba Tavastok and RAND are probably equal in regards
to global think tank importance and prowess, that.
Speaker 11: War a fault, and even the way that we live
today and stands for research and development. Of course, the
joke always say is that there is no development. It's
always been just research. Rand has no political affiliation. It's
not democratic, it's not republican, it's pro government. It's part
of the what some people are called the permanent government
of the United States, and it's been so since nineteen
forty eight when it was incorporated. It doesn't matter what
administration is in power, they will always turn to.
Speaker 5: Rand to do.
Speaker 6: This is essentially the brain trust, the thinking behind the
deep state. So this is the You could look at
this as not so much of the money side of
the deep state or the bureaucracy side of the deep state.
This is the brains of the deep state.
Speaker 11: Studies later sentences would be a Dan Rumsfeld who went
from being chairman of the board of the Rank Corporation
to being Secretary of Defense. It starts in nineteen forty
six as the military equivalent in peacetime of the Manhattan Project.
On The Manhattan Project, as you recall, was the combination
of civilian scientists and industry power, and the army and
the Air Force together combined, they gave us the atomic
bomb at menace in Eastern Europe, especially the development of
nuclear weapons and how to cite nuclear weapons, and also
how to counter the threat post by the Soviet Union.
Speaker 6: In other words, the Rank Corporation is really the brains
behind the entire Cold War. The Rand Corporation manufactured, propped up, promoted, agitated,
and advocated and sold the Cold War. That's really where
they come into to focus. Now, Tavistock we were talking
about at the time of World War Two. So Rand
is not on the on the doesn't exist yet. Rand
is like what Curtis Curtis LeMay, it comes to being
out of the Air Force right, kind of at the
beginning of the Cold War, if I remember, right. So
we're not at the point of rancorporation yet in terms
of where we are with Tavistock, but it is very
important to bring up Rand because it's kind of America's
version of Tavistock, so to speak. Now, Tavistock tends to
focus more on maybe issues of social science and control.
Rand Corporation has a much more of a tech minded bent, right,
So there's a lot of engineering studies, text studies going
on at RAN. For example, you may be familiar with
the idea of deep underground military bases that comes out
of Rand Corporation. Literally a lot of those older Rand
Corporation papers are declassified. For example, Rand put out in
the ninth I think in the nineteen fifties or sixties
or seventies, like how to construct giant underground tunnel systems,
this kind of stuff. Rank Corporation puts out studies how
to sell the American public on Obamacare. Literally, like the
Obamacare comes out of RAND Corporation studies. So this is
really the brains of the military industrial complex. Is the
way to think about RAN Corporation. Tavistok is the UK
version concerned with mainly social engineering and social control, but
there are a lot of overlaps between these two entities
are very similar and probably many of this same people.
Speaker 11: So the past sixty years, actually RAND has been at
the center, at the forefront of the major changes that
have occurred in the in US government and that have
occurred in US science. RAND wasn't only just important to
Iraq and to the Middle East. They're also important to terrorism.
Matter of fact, they created the feel of the terrorism studies,
the revolution and military affairs, the transformation of the nation's
armed forces.
Speaker 6: That was directly did you hear that the whole field
of terror studies comes out of RAND? And who were
many of the early founders of RAND Neo conservative Trotzkyites
Albert Wolfstetter.
Speaker 11: By Donald Rumsfeldt actually came about from plants that have
been gestated by.
Speaker 6: Rand Oh interesting or like Big nine type studies that
are you romsfell Big nine, rand Rumsfeld's at rand terror studies,
rumsfell right there during Big nine.
Speaker 11: Are people who have been affiliated with rants.
Speaker 7: You know, they have physicists and they have economists, and.
Speaker 11: They have sociologists, and so you have both the heart
sciences and the soft sciences.
Speaker 6: So they have continued with that.
Speaker 11: At this point. Fifty percent of the budget comes from
the federal government and the other fifty percent for private
contractors TENUS.
Speaker 6: People, public private partnership, just like Tavistock. So this has
nothing to do with the fake debate of the libertarians
versus the big government. By the way, if you want
to watch the rest of that, you can watch it
there and again I've I don't remember what I titled it,
but for my members section, I mean six years ago
we lectured through his entire book, So you can go
read that the member section. You'd also try to dig
up the old Lord Voldemart Alexabeya interviews somewhere from probably
that was probably twenty ten, two thousand and nine. It's
probably when that happened. I wonder just for fun sake,
let's see if we could find I remember so, by
the way, if you want the Internet as it was
in like twenty fourteen, you do yandex, right, which is
like a Russian search engine. So let's see, because I
guarantee it'll pull up somewhere on yandex here it is.
What do you know? And one thing I've noticed about
yandex which is interesting is that so this is not
the full interview. That full interview is right there the
rest of the hour. Here's old classic Voldemort from twenty ten.
What's interesting about index is that have you noticed when
it pulls up stuff from like YouTube? It's pulling up
videos that are not hidden, like they're still there, but
YouTube no longer pulls up these videos. Isn't that interesting?
I mean, I don't know what all is going on
or how it works. But for example, this is a
video from twenty ten that is still on YouTube. But
I guarantee you, like you're not gonna be able to
pull that up from YouTube's search engine.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 6: So here is the this is still on YouTube from
twenty eleven and the rise of the American input.
Speaker 5: Getting that.
Speaker 6: Here is a sit down interview that Lord V did
in twenty eleven. It's still on YouTube. See that, there's
the one I was talking about right there. So anyway,
if you want the Internet as it was in twenty fourteen,
you have to use yendex, Y A, and DX. That's
everything I've looked for that I remember, Oh, where's that
interview from twenty ten? Where's that article from twenty ten?
I can usually find it on yendex. So it's basically
what Google was in twenty ten. Who do you think
I'm talking about? Who did? I literally just play? All right,
let's rate a couple of super chats here, we got
thirty four jd N says Quantum Tavistock. Yeah, baby, that's
what I'm talking about. He's Mike em sends three dollars
and doesn't say anything but thank you so much, Mike
m Elon's Omega chip. Thank you. Excuse me? I think
that was a c FO yo. Panky blank diamond ring
is on my panky pankey gotta we gotta. I gotta
immediately go out and take all of my I'm gonna
take all of my BTC profits. I'm gonna cash out
right now. I'm gonna buy the giantesst diamond ring, panky
panky and cotton candy with all of my BTC right now. Literally,
that's what I'm doing. Cash out, baby and have fun.
By the way, we're only uh halfway through, so this
is a half talk for the public. If you would
like access to this full talk the rest of Tavistock.
As we work our way through, we'll see how many
more pages we got of information. We get one, two, three,
four eee yikes, I got nine more pages of notes,
so we got quite a bit more. Maybe I have
to make this a couple talks, but thank you so much,
AC five dollars. If they believe in evolution and dialectics,
what does that mean that some of them are fine
with tiny mustache Man fascism and that proves strong enough
to beat their fabianism. Wouldn't it just be the strongest evolution.
I think that the inner core knows that tiny mustache
Man was also supported by the same people. That's what
is referred to as the inner Party. So when when
he's writing nineteen eighty four, remember and he's he's describing
the Inner Party according to the way that O'Brien tells
him about it, right, the Inner Party is the only
group that knows what's going on, and they know that
it's a dialective because the whole book is about the
manufacturer controlled dialectics, right, That's a big part of it.
Because remember, the villain Emmanuel Goldstein is fake. He's a
created entity, a fabled enemy that the O'Brien and the
Inner Party control, because the O'Brien and the Inner Party
run the revolution against Big Brother, control opposition. So I
think the Inner Party of people like a Bredard Shaw
was probably an Inner Party person. I think they understood
that tiny mustache man could only go so far as
he was built up to go. And this is my speculation,
but probably modern enemies of the West like Iran are
in a similar area where they're really kind of on
a leash and they're kind of a contained opponent, and
there's not they're not really a threat to the West
or even to the Middle East, but it's helpful to
have them there as a perpetual, eternal excuse. And so
I don't think anytime soon we're going to have Iran
like literally getting rid of Israel. I would not trust
the Ayatolas and the Mulas. I think they're probably compromised
stooges to degree. I mean, why else does the US
give these people billions of dollars right, as well as
giving Israel billions of dollars right. So there's there's some
kind of allowed status for certain bad guys baddies. I'm
not saying that this is everywhere. I'm still working out
a lot of these positions and theories. I don't have
it all figured out. I think Castro was kind of
an allowed excuse villain because you have these like bad
guys that are allowed to stay in certain areas that
could very easily be taken out right, and they only
go after the bad guys that they want to for
certain reasons, right, They're not really going after bad guys.
So you know, Kim Jong is he can be the
excuse to be the threat and police that region. Castro
is the excuse to police this area. Putin, I think
there's a degree of real East West war but also
a degree of agreed allowed conflicts going on. Now, maybe
it spins out of control, maybe it gets worse, maybe
it's crazier, but anyway, that's my take. So I think
the same with I think the same with the Fabians,
like from their vantage point. They're not really worried about.
I think they have a real commitment to the long
term dialectic and slow kill model. James three dollars. Is
the CIA Schmimann connection something that you'll talk about, you
talking about father Alexander Schmieman. Yeah, So, by the way,
this is not controversial. Maybe a lot of people don't
know this, but Schmiman during the Cold War was and
did have CIA connections. Will you talk about grandson Grant?
I think you mean grandson. I don't know what that
means grandn CFR. Do you mean grandson? Now, I don't
know about this. Are you saying that Schmiman has a
grandson that's in the CFR. And by the way, I'm
not even necessarily saying that that makes father Schmiman a
bad guy. I think a lot of people during the
Cold War, really truly, you know, thought hey, we gotta
we got to fight the Soviets, you know they're going
to take over. But it also could explain, you know,
why there's the ecumenist elements within father Schmeimen. So I've
never really been a huge Schmimen fan. I've read a
couple of I've read three of his books. So I've
read the Liturgical book, I've read for the Life of
the World, and then I have that Church World Mission book,
which is really a humanist So I kind of once
I read that, I just didn't care about him anymore.
Now you're saying he has a grandson or a godson. Oh,
maybe you meant godson. What was your I think you
mean grandson. Okay, So Schmiman's son goes to Harvard Columbia. Uh, Serge,
he did a movie Behind the Hatred. I don't know
anything about who this person is. So does he have
a grandson? Is that this Adam guy? Who is the grandson?
I don't know who that is. I'm just trying to
find who you're talking about this cfr I'm still not
Are you saying Serge is Cfrge was a New York
Times reporter Harvard Columbia. Yeah, I mean that's obviously a
lot of that's probably going to be Slavic studies. Yeah,
I mean this is probably like CIA stuff here, ap.
I mean Harvard University is like hive of CIA, you know. Anyway,
long story short, there is a connection between the the
Cold War origins of the O c A and the CIA,
and it's pretty well known for people that even the clergy,
I mean it's clerics are the ones that have told
me this from various jurisdictions and even from the OCA,
multiple clerics. Seems to me like the OCA was a
big psyop for Orthodox to me, but I don't live
in the US. Massive influence in the St. Sergeion Ecumenist Institute, Yeah,
I wouldn't be surprised. Ours six one hundred dollars. Wow,
thank you so much, appreciate that ours, Thank you for
the stream. Well, thank you ours for the support you
and Elon's Chip have been great tonight, low pan ten dollars.
If you haven't already checked out, think tanks and power. Oh,
this sounds like a good one. Think tanks because this
is the stuff nobody studies and nobody cared. These are
the real people that control and run the world. And
you'll notice that none of your normy conservative people ever
talk about this. They only talk about the Libs. They
don't talk about the rancorporation and the Carnegie and the
Rockefeller and the blah blah blah blah, all the stuff
that I talk about for over ten years. None of
them talk about it. But I'm crazy and blah blah blah.
If you haven't checked out think tanks and power in
foreign policy, I will definitely that's right. On my own
study of the influence and role of the Council Foreign
Relations and the RIA. Say Millen published publication from two
thousand and four writing that down. Thank you so much,
low Pan noge double five dollars, Thank you so much.
Knowledge appreciate that, doctor Egman one dollar. What is the
aschological purpose of Mars and the planets? I mean, I
would speculate that the Eastern fathers speculate that the universe
is for a man to populate and to cultivate, like
Eden was. The whole world was originally going to be Eden,
so presumably the universe would be the expansion of Eden.
Brendan MASSI five dollars. I work in the private equity space,
Jay and many have done deals with large institutions. These
large institutions, I have a unique insight into how they
use financial tools such as tax exempt financing to shift
capital market. It's for their agenda. It is very calculated exactly.
That's a great point. That's an area I don't know
much about, but I'm not surprised. But wouldn't that demonstrate
that clearly far more is organized and engineered in our
world than what the normy conservatives think. No face kill
of five dollars. How in the world did the Hayes
code let a film like Lolita slide in nineteen sixty two?
Interesting theory, A good point. I mean, I hadn't thought
about that. Maybe it was they paid them off. I've
never seen Lolita actually, so I know I've seen Kuber
you know, all the other Kuberg movies, but I've not
actually seen Lolita, so I don't know if it doesn't
actually show anything. So maybe you could have like difficult
themes in a movie, but you couldn't show it. So,
but I haven't actually seen it, so I don't know.
Colin twenty five dollars. I'm a new viewer here. Thank
you for this great content. Well, hey, welcome, Colin. Thank
you so much for your support, much of prepreciated. Hopefully
you're learning and deriving some valuable infotainment. We try to
provide a mix of both right information and entertainment, so
some infotainment. By the way, if you've not major way
over to X to follow me, please do so. I'm
almost edging up towards one hundred k on X, really
looking forward to having a one hundred k X party.
We love to have our parties. It's like the office
over here. I'm like Michael Scott, where everything involves the
party planning committee. And that's you guys in my mods,
the beautiful, wonderful, fast Boy and fast Girl mods that
we have. Love you guys so much. You guys are
great mods. Love love all you regulars, and we got
to welcome new people. We got a we're still getting about.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 6: I wish the growth was as good as it was
on X, but it's not too bad. Like over here
on YouTube, we're still getting about two thousand a month,
so we're getting you know, new p That's good, guys.
I want to remind you too that I do have
a show's sponsor, and our show sponsor is the one only,
the best in supplementation. It is the premiere, the premiere
in supplementation Chalk dot com choq dot com. If you
use the link in the show description choq dot com,
it will take you over to their page and uh
you can find everything that you need for becoming toxically
masculine and it's not just Forduce. There's also some good
stuff for the ladies as well. If you enjoy working out,
if you enjoy an active lifestyle, to try to, you know,
keep that body fit, to try to keep them thick
thighs like I got them thick with three C's birthing
hips like I've got. If you want that thick, thick
hip like I got over here, if you want them gains,
all of my gains, they go to my hips. I
got like super buff built glutes and hips and everything
else is like skinny. It's really weird, but it's also
kind of cool. Just kidding. Actually, everybody over here should
be heading over to a c hoq dot com use
the promo code J forty if you want to test
it out and get forty percent off. Yeah. What if
what if I skipped leg and upper body day and
the only thing I didn't skip was hips and glutes.
That's all I worked out, and so I have like
a giant booty and giant thick hips with Triple C's baby,
you know what I'm saying. What if I was like that,
I would still have to thank chalk dot com. And
so we're gonna have a little brief message, we got
more super chest to go to, but let's hear from
our friend Vivek Roboswami real quick.
Speaker 13: Chad Mode is your ultimate natural pre workout designed to
take your performance to the next level. Chad Mode is
for natty beast alphas only. Whether you're hitting the gym,
invading a favella, conquering a small village, gambling, burning the
midnight oil, mogging on your coworkers, or getting banned from Facebook,
chad Mode gives you the competitive edge you need. It's
as simple as mixing one or two scoops of our
fine powder into water or juice, providing you with a delicious,
energizing beverage featuring a burst of sweet organic fruit flavor.
Chad Mode will give you the extra edge you desperately crave.
Chad Mode stands out from the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners,
and dyes. We've even avoided so called natural flavors, ensuring
a clean and effective formula. Only soy boys and Beta's guzzle,
blue dye and sucralose further tanking they're already low testosterone levels.
Chad Mode is made in America, Unlike your common TikTok
peasants' pre workout powder. It does not contain Chinese lab
made caffeine and artificial sweeteners that soyboys so often crave.
Experience the pure goodness of chad Mode with Blue Magic
registered trademark organic blue Spirillina extract, organic lemon cherry and
organic maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine. Embrace the natural power
of organic green coffee bean extract. Each dose of chad
Mode mirrors the caffeine of a cup and a half
of coffee, delivering a surge of energy. Alongside essential vitamins, minerals,
amino acids, and herbal extracts. Chad Mode will allow you
to fire your boss and mog on anyone who opposes you.
Chad Mode will give you a dominant and aggressive edge,
like a lion hunting a gazelle, where the gazelle is
a TikTok Jim Zoomer macro guzzling sucralose on the daily,
edging to TNF videos. Whether you're seeking a high poten
sed junk free pre workout or a better way to
kickstart your day, chad Mode has you covered. It's not
just for men. Chad Mode is a solution for anyone
ready to conquer their fitness us and life goals, dominate
their coworkers, and aggressively gamble their life savings. Don't miss
out security.
Speaker 6: Jamie loves the female vitality products like the Shila JiTT Ashwaganda.
I'm sorry I got distracted because I was over here
sneezing and I forgot to unmute. I have to mute
when the ad plays or else it doesn't work right.
And sometimes when you click to unmute, it doesn't register
because there's so many things running at the same time,
and so they slows the computer down, and we got
freaking Tom Cruise's face over here further slowing the computer dome. Also, guys,
remember to head on over to Jamie's channel and watch
the show that she premiered with Paranoid American, who we
met at Brohemian Grove the day that I got super
super super sick the first day where I was basically incapacitated,
and Jamie and Paranoid American covered Disney Theosophy and they
went really deep into Disney's use of and promotion of theosophy.
So be sure and check out that Jay Chalk is epic.
It really is a great product. I mean, the great
thing about being sponsors like I have access to basically
infinite chalk. I take it all the time, I really do.
I took I took Tonkat the last two or three
days and gave me that energy boost basically to finally
get back to working out because of being sick. So
I haven't worked out in two weeks because of basically
just the worst stomach virus ever. But then I took
chalk the past couple of days and I'm back to
working out. So I do attribute that to Chalk dot com.
So once again, ton Kettle is my favorite. But there's
advantages to all these other products, and so when you
head on over there, remember to use the promo code
J forty four life to get forty four percent off.
Like I said, we only got ten percent over here
at ladies, but ladies can make use of this. I
recommend the Performance Stack to dudes, but there's other options
and other possibilities over there. But this is just the
easiest way to go about. If you're a guy and
you want to get access to what's the best, then
add it to your car. Uses Bermaco J forty four Life,
jy four four Live, and you can cancel at any time,
so you're not bound by any contracts or anything like that.
If you sign up, you get it coming on the regular. Yeah.
I take chalk consistently. Absolutely. I don't take every day.
I would say I stagger it to about every other day.
I didn't take it when I was sick because I
had like severe viral stomach infection, so basically nothing was
My stomach would not accept anything, not even broth. I
mean it was. It was the worst illness I've ever
had in my life by far. I would have preferred
like a one to two day food poisoning over what
I had, like literally Serf and Leo three dollars. What
is your take on Trump's cabinet picks as a reason
for optimism or sign of a repeat. I mean, I
think we've got a better crop of people than twenty sixteen. Right,
twenty sixteen was it seemed like like the early picks
were like the decent people and then it immediately flipped
to neocons. Is that right? So hopefully we won't. We
got some decent better than we expected. There's a couple
bad apples. Maybe we can hope for you know, I'm
liking Trump's rhetoric, you know what I mean these I
mean AJ played a clip of Trump today just like like,
I mean, we have national emergency, national emergency on the border,
national emergency on the debt. I mean, this is all
the right rhetoric. Let's hope that it's not just rhetoric.
ED five dollars. What about the abolition of the family
and its effects on modern society? Yeah, I mean this
is one of the absolutely central planks of not just
communist manifesto, but what the Fabian socialists technocrats have had
for like ever, right, So, I mean that's something that
we have touched.
Speaker 5: On a lot.
Speaker 6: I mean, really, the whole deep hop and all of
that is first and foremost centered around the destruction of
the relationship between men and women and the family. So
a lot of this gender agitation that you see all
over the internet, a lot of that plays into what
we're talking about in terms of the destruction of the
family and thus the destruction of Western civilization. And again,
for the criticisms that we would have of a Coleman,
he did actually accurately predict that Tavistock and the Fabians
would literally destroy the family to destroy Western civilization. And again,
if you go back a couple of nights ago, when
I covered Frankfurt School, we had MARKUSA Reich Authoritarian personality
disorder put out by Frankfurt School Freud. They were all
basically saying the same thing that in order to have
the overthrow Western civilization, you have to destroy the family.
The way to destroy the family is to destroy the patriarchy.
The way to destroy the patriarchy is feminism. But the
only way to make feminism successful is through the sex revolution,
and the way to have that is to bring back
goddess worship and feminism. So yes, we covered that, William
one dollar. It's hard to imagine where many of us
would be without the work that you've done. Jay, I
thank you. Can't thank you enough for spelling out these
things for a lot of these slow boys. Hey, you
guys aren't slow. You guys are learning, and we are
making progress and you guys are becoming fast boys. And
that's really what I see my role as. So yeah,
thank you. I'm glad. I'm feeling better too. I mean, basically,
I just couldn't do anything for about although I did
do a couple of live streams. It took me a
while to have the energy to do a couple of
live streams when I was sick, but I'm fully over
the sick now. So but if you come over to
the channel, let's see see Secret Philosophy of the Left
that we did three days ago. That was Frankfurt School
and Sex, and then Psychology of the Left History and
Analysis was also relevant to this is almost kind of
like a part three in this Mindset of the Left
series that we've been kind of doing here. So be
sure and go back and watch those. If you miss them,
go watch Jamie Show. Guys. Also, if you want signed
copies of my books, you can head on over to
the shop at Jays Analysis. Every book over there is
a signed copy. Absolutely, don't worry about it. You don't
have to request it. They're all signed, and I usually
just make it out to the name of the person
that buys the book. Again, that's in the shop right here.
I'll show you guys that and look forward. Looking forward
to Esoteric Hollywood three. I hope you guys are as well.
Getting back to work on that this week, so maybe
the next three weeks I can have I'm gonna shoot
for the next two weeks to have the next fifty pages,
and then we'll have three hundred and fifty pages. But
if you want signed copies, if you've not read Esoteric
Hollywood one and two, go ahead and get signed copies
of that, because although the books do stand alone, it
will be the completion of a trilogy. So Star Hollywood
three is going to be called esoter Hollywood, Sex Cults,
and Apocalypse in film. It's not just about apocalypse movies,
so don't get that impression. It's a lot of movies
like the first two, but the last section will be
about the apocalypse in Hollywood because Hollywood is undergoing it's
apocalypse at least in the way that we've all known.
The classical Hollywood studio machine that's going away now. Unfortunately
now it's the big tech studio, it's Amazon, it's Apple Studios, right,
So I don't know that's going to get any better,
but Hollywood at least is going away, so maybe there's
positive science for that. What are your top five books?
Ed says for three dollars, I have a video where
I did top ten books that are top fifteen books
that everyone should read, So I would say go to
my YouTube channel and then top in type in top
books Jade Eyer. That should bring it up. Let's seef
that brings it up. Fifteen books to Read before you
die or top fifteen Orthodox books, so you could check
out those right there. But thank you for that, Ed
Bebski ten dollars. Shout out to Jay and all the
high IQ peeps that are paying attention to what really matters.
Thank you for all your content and your positive influence.
God bless you. Thank you so much. Bebski appreciate that.
And guys, remember you can always support me also at
any time, send a super chat at any time and
I'll read on the next stream. And this is part one,
So for part two, we'll work our way through the
rest of the Tabstock book for you guys, and we'll
grade a doctor Coleman on where he was right, where
he was wrong,