Speaker 1: Attention. You're listening to the top Huff radio show, America's
Speaker 1: home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The
Speaker 1: content of this program has been documented to prevent and
Speaker 1: even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
Speaker 1: to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host
Speaker 1: Tod Huff.
Speaker 2: My friends, the Democrat Party continues to be an absolute
Speaker 2: and utter disc array, and it's not time to celebrate,
Speaker 2: certainly not if they do not solve all of their
Speaker 2: problems by pushing Joe Biden out the door and replacing
Speaker 2: her or him with Kamala Harris. So you remember, sorry,
Speaker 2: it just just just the imagery. Do you remember or
Speaker 2: what campaign was it when there was an ad? Wasn't
Speaker 2: there an ad with Romney? Maybe it was McCain. It's
Speaker 2: been a while back where they had them pushing Grandma
Speaker 2: off the cliff in a wheelchair. I can't remember when
Speaker 2: that was. It's been a while, but I mean, in
Speaker 2: a sense they've pushed Biden off the cliff here thinking
Speaker 2: that it would solve their problems. It does not solve
Speaker 2: their problems, and I want to talk about that today.
Speaker 2: I want to talk about what this party supposedly that
Speaker 2: is for the process of democracy, for the defense of democracy,
Speaker 2: for absolute transparency what this party is doing in order
Speaker 2: to make this bait and switch move here in the
Speaker 2: final hours of the campaign clock. We'll get to that,
Speaker 2: my friends, in do course, but before we get rocking
Speaker 2: and rolling here today, folks have asked My Pillow for
Speaker 2: a well. They wanted a special on the Queen Size
Speaker 2: My Pillow Premium the Premium my Pillow, and My Pillow
Speaker 2: has answered they have decided to give the people what
Speaker 2: they've requested. The most requested offer was for the Queen
Speaker 2: Size Premium my Pillow. They've now got those on my
Speaker 2: pillow dot com slash todd for nineteen dollars in ninety eight.
Speaker 2: Since that's the lowest price ever nineteen dollars and ninety
Speaker 2: eight since my pillow dot Com slash todd, just use
Speaker 2: my name Todd at checkout you'll get that special price.
Speaker 2: You'll also get other special prices, including you can get
Speaker 2: a six peeth kitchen or bath house set for twenty
Speaker 2: five dollars, you can get brand new mattress toppers as
Speaker 2: low as sixty nine ninety eight, and you can choose
Speaker 2: to get the famous my Pillow bed she for as
Speaker 2: low as twenty five dollars, and there's a whole lot more,
Speaker 2: my friends, My pillow dot com slash Todd discount code
Speaker 2: or promo code Todd will get you those special prices,
Speaker 2: which also include the premium My Pillow Queen size pillow
Speaker 2: for only nineteen ninety eight, the lowest it's ever been.
Speaker 2: My pillow dot Com slash Todd promo code Todd. So
Speaker 2: CNN here listen to this, folks. Democrats approve what did
Speaker 2: we do? Here? Here we go. Democrats approve rules for
Speaker 2: likely Harris nomination. Democrats on Wednesday adopted the rules the
Speaker 2: party will use to choose their presidential nominee, with voting
Speaker 2: to officially nominate Kamala Harris likely to begin August first.
Speaker 2: Now this, you know the it's important to get into
Speaker 2: the details, right the doubles in the details, as people
Speaker 2: say it, and there is You'll remember that the Biden
Speaker 2: team tried to do this very thing. They tried to
Speaker 2: do this very thing they could since the pressure was
Speaker 2: mounting on their campaign. They knew that there was threats
Speaker 2: made as far as the two ways, as I've shared
Speaker 2: I shared in the previous hour, which we'll talk about
Speaker 2: this probably a little bit this hour as well. But
Speaker 2: the Democrat Party power brokers, the elite within the party
Speaker 2: came to Biden and they said, there's an easy way,
Speaker 2: in a hard way. The easy ways, you resign. We
Speaker 2: give you adoration and praise, We prop up your legacy,
Speaker 2: We protect Hunter the best that we can. We may
Speaker 2: even put a statue of you somewhere, may name some
Speaker 2: streets after you. Who knows the hard way is we
Speaker 2: invoke the twenty fifth Amendment, We take you down, we
Speaker 2: replace Kamala, replace you with Kamala. You are going to
Speaker 2: be You know your legacy will be tarnished. We will
Speaker 2: not defend your legacy. We will talk about how disgrace
Speaker 2: you were, how you destroyed the Democrat Party. And we're
Speaker 2: not going to provide any additional protection for Hunter Biden,
Speaker 2: and there certainly won't be any statues of you. So
Speaker 2: Biden chose the easy way. And so we saw his
Speaker 2: retirement speech, which I played in a previous hour, and
Speaker 2: that retirement speech unfortunately was not tied to any imminent retirement,
Speaker 2: which is typically what happens. But nonetheless Biden says, in fact,
Speaker 2: even thumbing his nose at the elite, saying for the
Speaker 2: next six months, he's going to go out there and
Speaker 2: do things. I try to reform the Supreme Court, defend
Speaker 2: our democracy, and cure cancer, which I thought was a
Speaker 2: Day one priority. I don't know if he got distracted
Speaker 2: with some big business deals coming in from Hunter, I'm
Speaker 2: not sure, but the bottom line is that's now back
Speaker 2: on his radar. But in trying to prevent that from happening,
Speaker 2: as all that was going on, all that backroom deals,
Speaker 2: all the backroom stuff was going on, all the threats
Speaker 2: and all the negotiation about who's going to be the
Speaker 2: party's nominee, campaign was trying to expedite. They were trying
Speaker 2: to get virtual the process to be done virtually, which
Speaker 2: is something they're going to have to do anyway, because
Speaker 2: because of timelines, because of timelines, and so if you
Speaker 2: read down in this article, which I've got pulled up here,
Speaker 2: I think here it is the party has set its
Speaker 2: goal to nominate its presidential and vice presidential candidates by
Speaker 2: August seventh. So they said the goal was to nominate
Speaker 2: their presidential and vice presidential candidates by August seventh. Now
Speaker 2: it says why the reason here is to avoid the
Speaker 2: possibility of litigation, that is, legal action and lawsuits for
Speaker 2: those of you who have tuned in from well being
Speaker 2: Bernie Sanders supporters, but over ballid access in Ohio. While
Speaker 2: the state has pushed its deadline for political parties to
Speaker 2: submit their official nominees to September first, the new law
Speaker 2: won't take effect until the end of August. So there's
Speaker 2: some legal gray area there regarding what would happen if
Speaker 2: they did not have You know, they just want to
Speaker 2: get stuff done in a timely fashion to make sure
Speaker 2: that they don't have ballot access problems in the state
Speaker 2: of Ohio. But their convention isn't until August nineteenth, So
Speaker 2: do they not think about this beforehand? This is a
Speaker 2: late convention. You know. Again, I said this before in
Speaker 2: other ways. I'll say it again. The party who thinks
Speaker 2: they can control every aspect of your life, the party
Speaker 2: who thinks they can bring absolute fairness to every business
Speaker 2: transaction on planet Earth. They believe that they can make
Speaker 2: sure every single woman is paid identically to every single man.
Speaker 2: All these things. They believe they can control the sea levels.
Speaker 2: They believe they can control I mean, you name it.
Speaker 2: They believe that they can usher any topia, they can't
Speaker 2: even look at the calendar and say, hey, boss, we
Speaker 2: might want to move the convention up because there could
Speaker 2: be a problem here. So now they're pushing. They're pushing
Speaker 2: to have their nominee for president and vice president by
Speaker 2: August seventh, which is still a full twelve days, almost
Speaker 2: two full weeks, almost two full weeks before the convention
Speaker 2: even starts. And the convention, the purpose of the convention
Speaker 2: is to officially nominate their president and vice presidential candidates.
Speaker 2: So now they are trying to so they're doing this virtually.
Speaker 2: So this is what Biden's campaign was trying to do.
Speaker 2: And I remember just a few maybe last week, I
Speaker 2: remember talking about this, and I remember the campaign being
Speaker 2: told that everything is on hold. The soonest that the
Speaker 2: digital voting or the virtual nomination could begin would be
Speaker 2: on August first. And I said at the time, I said,
Speaker 2: that means that they've given themselves about ten days or
Speaker 2: whatever it was to get Biden out of office. And
Speaker 2: Biden can survive these next ten days, he's gonna make it.
Speaker 2: If he can't, it's all said and done, right, And
Speaker 2: so that's what was happening now because they've gotten the
Speaker 2: person that they want to have on the ballot who
Speaker 2: they think is the best chance has the best chance
Speaker 2: at winning. Now, they're going to make sure that everything
Speaker 2: is started, you know, digitally by August first, which was
Speaker 2: the earliest that it could have possibly happened with Biden,
Speaker 2: And it didn't appear that was even going to be
Speaker 2: the case because they were dragging their feet, because again,
Speaker 2: this is anything but a fair and transparent process. But
Speaker 2: let me say, if I go back to this article,
Speaker 2: here we go, so the the Minutocratic National Committee chair
Speaker 2: Jim Harrison said, we're working hard. I mean, can you
Speaker 2: believe cher Harrison saying this the audacity to say this
Speaker 2: with a straight face. I'm just reading the quote. I'd
Speaker 2: like to see. I'd like to see the facial expression
Speaker 2: that goes along with this. We are working hard to
Speaker 2: execute this nomination with transparency, with fairness and efficiency. You're
Speaker 2: kidding me. Delegates are free to support who they choose.
Speaker 2: Bet me, they are. Bet me they are. The pressures
Speaker 2: for these delegates to choose Kamala early and quickly and
Speaker 2: get this done is off the charts. Oh, you can
Speaker 2: choose whomever you want, wink wink, But you ain't going
Speaker 2: to be a delegate. Again, there's going to be some
Speaker 2: high pressure exerted upon you. Don't be trying to do
Speaker 2: this until they have secured a majority of delegates, which
Speaker 2: appears to have been the case. She believe is believed
Speaker 2: to have a majority of the delegates that have pledged
Speaker 2: their support for her. But who knows what will happen.
Speaker 2: But he's saying, delegates are free to support who they choose,
Speaker 2: and we are glad that they are engaging in this
Speaker 2: important moment history. This, by the way, is a debacle.
Speaker 2: This is an embarrassment. This Can you imagine if the
Speaker 2: Republican Party's convention looked like this the way that it
Speaker 2: would be mocked and ridiculed, and rightfully so, I don't
Speaker 2: see much ridicule going on for this process. The chair
Speaker 2: continues here, as a party, we have an obligation to
Speaker 2: design and implement a fair nomination process for delegates to
Speaker 2: officially express their preferences through a vote. I mean, it's
Speaker 2: nuts to think that this is anything remotely close to
Speaker 2: fair or transparent or that is a reflection of democracy.
Speaker 2: This is the ruling class making decisions for you. That's
Speaker 2: pure and simple. What this is, This is the opposite.
Speaker 2: This is an oligarchy. Now let me say that this
Speaker 2: is how the political party system has always been designed.
Speaker 2: It's always been designed this way. That's why, in fact, folks,
Speaker 2: it's not just that the delegates get to have the
Speaker 2: ultimate say over the end of the voter. It's also
Speaker 2: that they've gone to a step further and they've established
Speaker 2: super delegates. So not even all delegates are the same.
Speaker 2: So when they bring people into the room to cast
Speaker 2: their balance, they have this group of people called super delegates.
Speaker 2: And super delegates are like I guess, they're like superheroes
Speaker 2: and they have super special powers over the rest of
Speaker 2: the people. So you've got the people voting. We're told
Speaker 2: the Democrats care about democracy. Does this sound like democracy
Speaker 2: to you, which I'm not even saying America doesn't have.
Speaker 1: We have.
Speaker 2: You could say democratic aspects. This is a constitutional republic.
Speaker 2: America is not a democracy. There are certainly aspects of democracy,
Speaker 2: if you will, in our country. I would say it's
Speaker 2: more along the lines of the idea of self governance.
Speaker 2: It's not the idea of majority of majority rule, but
Speaker 2: it certainly has the idea that the majority of people
Speaker 2: can select who their representatives are, There's no doubt about that,
Speaker 2: and that's a good thing. We should be able to
Speaker 2: engage in self governance, of course, Really what we should
Speaker 2: be able to engage in is to be able to
Speaker 2: live our lives as we see fit without government interference.
Speaker 2: That's the real If you want to talk about what
Speaker 2: the real choice, I guess the democratic way would be
Speaker 2: is to let people live their lives. Let people live
Speaker 2: their lives, only have laws when there is something that
Speaker 2: is a direct threat or impact of someone's life. Liberty, happiness, property,
Speaker 2: We don't need laws. We don't need the majority dictating
Speaker 2: to the rest of us how we need to live
Speaker 2: our personal lives. What we value, what we cherish, whom
Speaker 2: we worship or not worship, what we can say or
Speaker 2: not say. That is not what is a good thing.
Speaker 2: What is a good thing is liberty. And that's something
Speaker 2: I don't ever hear talked about on the left. Liberty
Speaker 2: and freedom, the right to live your life as you choose,
Speaker 2: no matter what the majority says. The majority can certainly
Speaker 2: keep you and keep me from exercising our freedoms in
Speaker 2: certain areas, freedoms that directly impact the life, liberty, property,
Speaker 2: pursuit of happiness of someone else, not hurting their feelings.
Speaker 2: But my right to swing my arm ends where someone
Speaker 2: else's nose begins. That's the real role of government. But
Speaker 2: they want to tell you they want to have a majority.
Speaker 2: That says, now here's what we value as a country.
Speaker 2: We value the woman's right to choose, for example. Therefore,
Speaker 2: you can't say anything bad about abortion. That is not freedom,
Speaker 2: my friends, That is not liberty. You might say, see
Speaker 2: and that you could say that could be pure democracy,
Speaker 2: but that does not have any regard for the individual
Speaker 2: liberty of the individual person. That, my friends, is not
Speaker 2: what this is about. This is about them getting their way,
Speaker 2: getting their candidates at all costs, stopping Biden, trying to
Speaker 2: keep President Trump from winning the White House again. This
Speaker 2: is the Einfeld Newman's strategy. As I've said on here
Speaker 2: many times before, they'll do whatever it takes for as
Speaker 2: long as it takes them, so long as it takes
Speaker 2: Trump away from the White House. Much more to say
Speaker 2: about this, My friend's gonna shift gears here. Just a
Speaker 2: tad bit before we do that, let me remind you
Speaker 2: that heart disease has taken the lives of seven hundred
Speaker 2: thousand Americans in each of the last two years. Science
Speaker 2: has shown us that heart disease takes a long time
Speaker 2: before it truly weakens our hearts, and we should be
Speaker 2: using that time to take care of it. And one
Speaker 2: of the ways that we can take care of it
Speaker 2: is by taking two Salty Soft jails a day. It
Speaker 2: has a it has what's called theoflavin A theoflavin super
Speaker 2: extract that is in this product. It comes from enriched
Speaker 2: green tea and it's a dietary supplement that is to
Speaker 2: be used for optimal cholesterol health. And so you can
Speaker 2: go to Salty you can use my name Todd as
Speaker 2: a listener of this program. You get a special price.
Speaker 2: You're gonna save twenty nine ninety five off your first order.
Speaker 2: You're going to get that's about half off, a little
Speaker 2: bit more than than half off. You need a three
Speaker 2: month supply to try the product, and if you continue,
Speaker 2: you'll get a further discount. And I believe it's free
Speaker 2: shipping as well. Salty dot Com will give you all
Speaker 2: that information. So so l t E a Salty dot Com
Speaker 2: promo code Todd will get you that special price. Salty
Speaker 2: dot Com. So so l t E a promo code Todd.
Speaker 2: So the Democrat Party is an absolute disarray, there's no doubt,
Speaker 2: there's no question. We talked about this. Well, they're trying
Speaker 2: to force Kamala down the throats of the American people, down,
Speaker 2: down the throats of the Democratic Party. I briefly reference
Speaker 2: and I'll just briefly reference this again. I've got this
Speaker 2: in the stack of stuff. This is a Breitbart article,
Speaker 2: although I have it. I think i've got the original
Speaker 2: article for they're with me here. I think I've got
Speaker 2: the original New York Times piece as well. There's a
Speaker 2: piece from the Federalist. Basically Biden was finally quit once
Speaker 2: he was once he was threatened with the twenty fifth Amendment.
Speaker 2: And I've talked about that, but I just want to
Speaker 2: mention that to tell you that is in the stack
Speaker 2: of stuff. Should you want to take should you want
Speaker 2: to take a look at that. So there's another piece
Speaker 2: that I want to reference at town Hall. This is
Speaker 2: Katie Pavlick. This is no, that's not the one that
Speaker 2: I want to reference. I clicked the wrong link. Let's
Speaker 2: see if I did. I think I did so. But
Speaker 2: the there's a piece about what the media is going
Speaker 2: to do as it pertains to this campaign, because here's
Speaker 2: what's going to happen, and I don't even know if
Speaker 2: it's going to happen to this extent, So the Democrats
Speaker 2: can see the writing was on the wall where this
Speaker 2: campaign was going. I still maintain I put nothing past
Speaker 2: the Democrats, especially when they get all seven pillars of
Speaker 2: propaganda working together to try to communicate their message. When
Speaker 2: you factor in the fact that we have a lot
Speaker 2: of low information voters, a lot of people out there
Speaker 2: who only vote based upon whatever someone in Hollywood tells
Speaker 2: them or I mean, my goodness, whatever the cool and
Speaker 2: hip choice of the day is, which somehow that was
Speaker 2: Biden and his aviators, somehow that was dark branded with
Speaker 2: his glowing red eyes. But that there's a certain number
Speaker 2: of people that are going to vote for Biden no
Speaker 2: matter what. I don't understand it. I mean, I do
Speaker 2: understand it. They this is the result of what it
Speaker 2: of causing people to be dependent upon the government, of
Speaker 2: making them hate the political opposition, of making them believe
Speaker 2: that their country is literally in peril if they elect
Speaker 2: the other guy. Ironically, the biggest dangers this country faces
Speaker 2: today domestically are within the radical left. The ideology, the godless,
Speaker 2: absolutely morally bankrupt ideology of the radical left is the
Speaker 2: biggest threat we faced domestically in this in this country.
Speaker 2: But that of course requires some thought and some analysis,
Speaker 2: and it requires not just listening to the nonsense and
Speaker 2: the drivel that comes across MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times,
Speaker 2: the Washington Post and the rest. So Kamala is now
Speaker 2: being inserted into the race. That's the plan anyway, That's
Speaker 2: what it looks like. Although again I reference the story
Speaker 2: that's in the stack of stuff that Obama is holding
Speaker 2: off on endorsing Kamala. This is this is at townhall
Speaker 2: dot com. We might know why Obama has been silent
Speaker 2: about Kamala Harris. Matt Vespa rights Barack Obama released a
Speaker 2: detailed letter in the after math of President Biden dropping
Speaker 2: out of the race. It did not endorse Kamala Harris,
Speaker 2: who is taking over the top spot of the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four Democratic Party ticket. Most of the parties behind
Speaker 2: Harris since they have no other choice. The party is
Speaker 2: saddled with two loser candidates, though one Harris appears to
Speaker 2: have solved the Democrats fundraising problems for now, Yet the
Speaker 2: most popular Democrat has been mom On Harris, and we
Speaker 2: know why. He also thinks she can't beat Trump. That's
Speaker 2: according to reporting from the New York Posts. Former President
Speaker 2: this is what it says. Former President Barack Obama hasn't
Speaker 2: endorsed Kamala Harris's presidential bid because he doesn't think she
Speaker 2: can beat Donald Trump, according to a source close to
Speaker 2: the Biden family. Again these unnamed sources. Who knows, but
Speaker 2: this is what's being reported. Following Joe Biden's shock resignation
Speaker 2: from the race on Sunday, I would not call it that,
Speaker 2: but anyway, his immediate endorsement of the vice president. Most
Speaker 2: of the Democratic elite have been quick to rally behind Harris,
Speaker 2: but Obama is a notable exception. Obama's very upset because
Speaker 2: he knows she can't win, the Biden family source told
Speaker 2: the Post. So, Biden's not endorsing Kamala, but the Democrat
Speaker 2: Party is gathering around her, supporting her. The money that
Speaker 2: was shut down, that wasn't going to be given to
Speaker 2: Biden unless he stepped aside, that is now flowing to Kamala.
Speaker 2: I think that there's going to be a bump in
Speaker 2: the polling for Kamala. But I also think it's going
Speaker 2: to quickly dissipate. I think it's going to come back
Speaker 2: to reality. People are going to hear her on the
Speaker 2: debate stage, or they're going to hear her on the
Speaker 2: campaign trail, using phrases and saying stupid things. This is
Speaker 2: not I mean, this is going to be the ceiling.
Speaker 2: Now I know how high the ceiling will be. Again,
Speaker 2: you got a factor in the amount of anti Trump
Speaker 2: hatred and so forth. But she's nowhere near. She's nowhere
Speaker 2: near once the dust settles, the savior for the party
Speaker 2: that they want her to be. So more about this
Speaker 2: the state of the Democrat Party and where this election
Speaker 2: is headed. On the other side of the break, my friends.
Speaker 2: In the meantime, I must inform you, my vast, vast,
Speaker 2: vast team of attorneys has informed me to tell you.
Speaker 2: They wanted me to make sure. I told you that
Speaker 2: listening to this program may cause you to lean to
Speaker 2: the right, So exercise the absolute highest levels of caution
Speaker 2: if you're operating heavy machinery, if you are driving a vehicle,
Speaker 2: I would say if you are simply walking down the hallway,
Speaker 2: you better be careful. Because listening can cause you to
Speaker 2: lean to the right. You have been warned, my friends,
Speaker 2: I will accept no responsibility for what happens as you
Speaker 2: drift to the right. Science has spoken. A ninety eight
Speaker 2: percent of scientists agree that those are the side effects
Speaker 2: of listening to this program. But a quick time out
Speaker 2: as an order back here in just a minute, my friends,
Speaker 2: last segment, I was wanting to get to this, trying
Speaker 2: to paint the picture of just where we find ourselves. Right,
Speaker 2: So we've got Kamala who's been pushed on the American people,
Speaker 2: Joe's been pushed out the back door, off the cliff
Speaker 2: and abandoned and threatened and everything else. And now we've
Speaker 2: got now we've got an instantaneous, maybe a little bump
Speaker 2: of excitement, right. I mean, you had a candidate who
Speaker 2: has been president for almost four years. They all know,
Speaker 2: no matter how much they deny it, that this president
Speaker 2: is not a good one. There's nothing to be excited about.
Speaker 2: They knew that he was not in control mentally. They
Speaker 2: know all these things. They deny it because they have
Speaker 2: an allegiance to an ideology, to a political party. Some
Speaker 2: of them have, some of them are just completely absolutely
Speaker 2: bankrupt morally so. But there's a little bit of excitement,
Speaker 2: right there's the excitement that you know, a new candidate.
Speaker 2: You know, they've got the angles. We got a female
Speaker 2: could be our first female president, our first black female president.
Speaker 2: All you got race, you got all these things, things
Speaker 2: that just make the Democrat Party just just thrive. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is what they what they live for, is narratives
Speaker 2: like this, and so there's some excitement. But I think
Speaker 2: there might be a bump of positivity. But everything everywhere
Speaker 2: we look, we see Trump is still Trump is still ahead,
Speaker 2: and a head to head contest, head to head contest
Speaker 2: with Kamala. So she might see a bump, but the
Speaker 2: excitement is going to wan the reality that she is
Speaker 2: a leftist and a lot of Democrats aren't going to
Speaker 2: like that. Wouldn't surprise me if she picks someone as
Speaker 2: her vice presidential running mate who can at least try
Speaker 2: to get the middle of the party better. I don't
Speaker 2: know who. I've seen names, of course, you've seen him
Speaker 2: as well, Josh Shapiro, Andy Basher, folks like that, the
Speaker 2: governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, People who are not
Speaker 2: I mean, as radical as she is, they're part of
Speaker 2: a party that's radical, but they've somehow convinced people that
Speaker 2: they're moderate, or they've been able to maintain that to
Speaker 2: win some elections in states that aren't radically left, like Pennsylvania, Kentucky,
Speaker 2: and North Carolina. So but the excitement is going to
Speaker 2: settle down, and as we get into obviously closer to
Speaker 2: November and the one thing that's going to happen that
Speaker 2: we all know it's going to happen, but I'm just
Speaker 2: going to say it. There's a piece about this at
Speaker 2: the Federalist dot com. Headline says this Kamala can't win
Speaker 2: on policy or performance, so the media will make this
Speaker 2: a campaign or race war. So buckle up for what
Speaker 2: this is about to be. You've already seen if you've
Speaker 2: been on social media or if you live in certain
Speaker 2: parts of the country, you've already seen people begin to say,
Speaker 2: women unite. You know this is Kamala Harris, let's all
Speaker 2: be women and vote for the first female president. You've
Speaker 2: heard the same things regarding her race. So this will
Speaker 2: be not just maybe a war on race, this will
Speaker 2: be a war on gender. This will be a repeat
Speaker 2: of what the two thousand and eight campaign with Barack
Speaker 2: Obama was which I'll share a story about that in
Speaker 2: a moment Before I do that, My friends, are you
Speaker 2: tired of dry, irritated skin? I know you're tired of
Speaker 2: big corporations. So this year you can support these small,
Speaker 2: unwoke brands like ofp Farms. Ofp farms is a family
Speaker 2: owned business. They own a god fearing goat farm that
Speaker 2: crafts all natural, small batch bath and body and famous
Speaker 2: gift sets. Now I've told you about some of these
Speaker 2: gift sets, you should check out the one, the newest
Speaker 2: gift set that has the iconic photo of Trump in
Speaker 2: the wake of the assassination. These are gift sets with
Speaker 2: products that help you take care of your skin. They've
Speaker 2: got some absolutely fantastic soaps other products as well. Check
Speaker 2: out the gift set. Ofpfarms dot com is the web
Speaker 2: site o fpfarmswithan s dot com. Ofp farms dot com
Speaker 2: if you use my name Todd, you're gonna save fifteen
Speaker 2: percent off your purchase. By the way, they're donating profits
Speaker 2: from one of the lines that they have there to
Speaker 2: the campaign, so you can check that out as well.
Speaker 2: Ofpfarms dot Com is the website promo code Todd will
Speaker 2: save you fifteen percent. The soap is really high quality.
Speaker 1: I use it.
Speaker 2: I've I got a couple of bars. I love it.
Speaker 2: I love it actually o fp Farms dot Com promo
Speaker 2: code Todd. So this is what I think going back
Speaker 2: to Kamala and what the media is going to do
Speaker 2: with the Democrat part of the government apparatus is going
Speaker 2: to do that pillar of propaganda. They're going to make
Speaker 2: this all about race and gender because it can't be
Speaker 2: about policy, it can't be about performance, it can't be
Speaker 2: about ideas, it can't be about her record. She's a leftist,
Speaker 2: my friend. She's not some moderate. She is a radical leftist.
Speaker 2: Half the country, heck, maybe more than that, has no
Speaker 2: clue about who she is, her history. She is an
Speaker 2: insane radical leftist. She was elected as a senator to
Speaker 2: the People's Republic of California, or from the state of
Speaker 2: the People's Republic of California. You don't just waltz in
Speaker 2: there as some moderate and win those seats. I mean
Speaker 2: that is a not just a Democrat stronghold, that is
Speaker 2: a radical leftist stronghold that state. That state has totally
Speaker 2: destroyed itself self, inflicted wounds in the People's Republic of
Speaker 2: California by electing people like Kamala Harris, like Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 2: like Nancy Pelosi, like Adam Schiff. I could go on
Speaker 2: and on. This is a radically leftist state and she's
Speaker 2: one of the leading voices in that radically left state.
Speaker 2: She was as what attorney general and everything else, just
Speaker 2: a radical leftist. So none of these things are going
Speaker 2: to serve to help her. So what are they going
Speaker 2: to do? Folks? This is as predictable as the rising
Speaker 2: of the sun in the morning, Kamala, this race is
Speaker 2: going to be made into a race about well, a
Speaker 2: campaign about race and a campaign about gender. Now I've
Speaker 2: shared this story before, but I remember this, and I
Speaker 2: think this is important to note because they use, they
Speaker 2: know how to manipulate people's emotions and use them against them.
Speaker 2: I remember I was traveling with someone near and dear
Speaker 2: to me across not across the country, but several hundred
Speaker 2: miles away, maybe even up to one thousand miles. We
Speaker 2: were on a trip, and I remember the conversation coming
Speaker 2: up about politics. This was in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 2: so this has been a while ago, and this individual
Speaker 2: wasn't sure who they were voting for, and they said
Speaker 2: to me, you know, I just don't. I don't want
Speaker 2: to not vote for Obama because he's black. And I said, well,
Speaker 2: then don't, I said, but I would also tell you
Speaker 2: you shouldn't vote for him because he's black, right, I mean,
Speaker 2: if you don't, if you're worried that you don't want
Speaker 2: his race to be a negative thing to say, don't
Speaker 2: vote for him because of the race, then it's also
Speaker 2: equally true that the reason you vote for them shouldn't
Speaker 2: be upon race. Don't think about that, Think about who
Speaker 2: they are, what they want to accomplish, what their objectives are,
Speaker 2: what the platform of the party they're representing at representing is,
Speaker 2: and then make it decision based upon that. You know,
Speaker 2: if you were using it's crazy to me. It's a
Speaker 2: two way street. It's a two way street. But meaning
Speaker 2: I can't, I shouldn't use race as a factor to
Speaker 2: either support or oppose the candidates. It should be about ideas.
Speaker 2: This is not hard for me. I don't, and it's
Speaker 2: not hard for the vast majority of you. But some
Speaker 2: people struggle with this because they're emotionally manipulated. Why is
Speaker 2: it okay, to use race as a factor if it
Speaker 2: is one that can be used to cause people to
Speaker 2: vote for someone if they are a certain race or ethnicity.
Speaker 2: The same would go for gender. Why do these things,
Speaker 2: why do they come into the equation at all, Well,
Speaker 2: they come into the equation at all because they believe
Speaker 2: these seven pillars are propaganda. The radical leftists running the
Speaker 2: show think that those things can be used in their favor,
Speaker 2: and so that's why they become an issue. And so
Speaker 2: that's look Obama in two thousand and eight, that was
Speaker 2: that's what the race was largely about. And it's it's unfortunate,
Speaker 2: it's it's a wonderful thing that this country got to
Speaker 2: a point to where it was prepared to vote for
Speaker 2: someone who was black, because the history of this country
Speaker 2: regarding race is not good. There's many many problems that
Speaker 2: this country has regarding to race in its history. But
Speaker 2: to get to the point are so, to get to
Speaker 2: the point where you can vote in favor of a
Speaker 2: black candidate, that's a good thing. But we should not
Speaker 2: simply use that as the reason or rationale, just like
Speaker 2: we should not use the same rationale that says, oh,
Speaker 2: she's a woman, this is I've seen stupid social media
Speaker 2: posts it's the year of the Woman. What does that
Speaker 2: even mean? This is so ridiculous and nonsensical. You know,
Speaker 2: people should have a right to vote for whomever they want.
Speaker 2: But there's a part of me that says, I understand
Speaker 2: if you can't give at least a reason for why
Speaker 2: you're voting for someone that is a reason that even
Speaker 2: makes some degree of sense. I question whether I can
Speaker 2: understand why the questions about, you know, just having people
Speaker 2: to be able to vote without any idea, but what
Speaker 2: they're talking about come in and saying I'm voting for
Speaker 2: this person because they're black, or because they have a
Speaker 2: good whatever that they're a woman, or because they're white,
Speaker 2: or because they've got a good jump shot, as I
Speaker 2: heard someone say about Obama in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 2: None of those are reasons. You can give a reason
Speaker 2: that doesn't have to do with these things. Instead, because
Speaker 2: these things have been used to emotionally manipulate us in
Speaker 2: the past, they're going to be attempted. They're going to attempt,
Speaker 2: i should say, to use them to manipulate people in
Speaker 2: the future because it's the only chance they've got, and
Speaker 2: that's going to make things even more tense out there,
Speaker 2: which in some respect is hard to even imagine. But
Speaker 2: I gotta take a break, quick time out. My friends
Speaker 2: back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So
Speaker 2: I want to shift gears here a little bit. In
Speaker 2: this final segment of this hour of the show, I
Speaker 2: want to highlight some of the absolute utter hypocrisy that
Speaker 2: exists with the radical left, especially as it pertains to
Speaker 2: those who like to virtue signal. So I'll do that
Speaker 2: here in just a moment. But before I do that,
Speaker 2: my friends, let me remind you. If you are chewing,
Speaker 2: if you are vaping, if you are smoking, Nickknack Naturals
Speaker 2: is here to help you crush your vice. Now they've
Speaker 2: created a mint. It's a nicotine mint. So this product
Speaker 2: is not for you. If you don't use nicotine currently,
Speaker 2: this is not for you. But if you are, and
Speaker 2: if you're tired of dealing with the messiness, the smoke,
Speaker 2: the spitting, the slimy pouches, the spit cans, the bad breath,
Speaker 2: all these things smoke bricks. If you're tired of that
Speaker 2: and you're looking for a naturally better alternative, a cleaner
Speaker 2: alternative to this. Uh, these different types of forms of nicotine.
Speaker 2: Then check out Nicknack dot com in ic nac nicknack
Speaker 2: dot com. You'll get a fifteen percent discount when you
Speaker 2: use my name Todd during the checkout process. They got
Speaker 2: a series of mints. They're discreet, they're odorless, they're not messy.
Speaker 2: You don't have to leave the office or the go
Speaker 2: outside at the home whenever you are wanting a nicotine product.
Speaker 2: Nicknack dot com is the website promo code Todd save
Speaker 2: you fifteen percent. So, folks, this stuff is unbelievable. Really,
Speaker 2: you go to the stack of stuff, you can find
Speaker 2: this article. It's at the Daily Caller dot com. I
Speaker 2: just I cannot again, this is poetic justice. Here's the headline.
Speaker 2: We do not have room sanctuary state to offer plane
Speaker 2: tickets for migrants to leave. So this state, by the way,
Speaker 2: what's this. It's Massachusetts. Massachusetts a sanctuary state. Which what's
Speaker 2: a sanctuary state? A sanctuary state is a state that says, hey,
Speaker 2: if you're here illegally in this country, you can come here,
Speaker 2: and we've created a sanctuary for you, a safe place.
Speaker 2: You know, we're not here, We're I mean, in the
Speaker 2: most extreme cases, you prevent you interfere with attempts of
Speaker 2: enforcing the law. On the simplest of terms, they oftentimes
Speaker 2: just simply withhold resource. So the law might be to
Speaker 2: deport certain people who are known to be there illegally,
Speaker 2: but they just simply don't allocate state resources to fulfill
Speaker 2: the law. But in the most extreme sort of circumstances,
Speaker 2: they actually provide, i mean, cover for people to break
Speaker 2: the law. So they've taken this stance. They say, we're
Speaker 2: a sanctuary state. We believe every no person is illegal.
Speaker 2: They would say, come to our state, We're here to
Speaker 2: protect you. Now they have too many people. Here's what
Speaker 2: the article says. A New England state that has long
Speaker 2: been regarded as a quote sanctuary for illegal immigrants is
Speaker 2: not dramatically scaling back its emergency migrant shelter services and
Speaker 2: offering plane rides for them to leave. According to a
Speaker 2: Tuesday announcement, boy, this sounds very very compassionate to me.
Speaker 2: Democratic Massachusetts Governor Mara Healey announced that the state will
Speaker 2: limit stays overflow shelters to just five days for migrants
Speaker 2: beginning next month, and that it will offer to cover
Speaker 2: plane tickets and other travel expenses for migrants who wish
Speaker 2: to leave. According to Boston twenty five News, the announcement
Speaker 2: comes as Massachusetts has been rocked with waves of illegal
Speaker 2: immigrants in need of housing and other services. I want
Speaker 2: to be clear, boy. Usually when a politician says that
Speaker 2: what they're about to say is designed to muddy the waters,
Speaker 2: they don't really want to be clear. They want to
Speaker 2: manipulate you into thinking that they're making a strong stance
Speaker 2: when reality strikes and they're really not, particularly to people
Speaker 2: outside of Massachusetts who may have gotten word that this
Speaker 2: is a place to come, that we do not have
Speaker 2: room here in Massachusetts. I just this is I mean,
Speaker 2: how what are these people thinking? This is the problem
Speaker 2: if there's not problems in Massachusetts Massachusetts, or if there
Speaker 2: are problems in Massachusetts, there's problems everywhere. Massachusetts is about
Speaker 2: as far from the southern border as you can get.
Speaker 2: You took a position of virtue signaling people have shown up,
Speaker 2: and now you realize that this is not a sustainable path.
Speaker 2: This is so so who should take them? Who? Who
Speaker 2: should take them? You know, it's not sympathetic to say
Speaker 2: I'm going to force my neighbor to do something that
Speaker 2: is not sympathy. No, if you want to, if you
Speaker 2: want to be empathetic and sympathetic, if you want to
Speaker 2: be involved in solving the problem, then fine, have right
Speaker 2: at it. Of course, I would say you got to
Speaker 2: make sure you follow the federal laws, which they don't
Speaker 2: seem to be caring about whatsoever. But now the position
Speaker 2: is we can't take people in our sanctuary state when
Speaker 2: that specifically meant we're here to provide refuge for people
Speaker 2: who aren't needing a place to live Massachusetts. This is
Speaker 2: via a press release. Massachusetts is out of shelter space
Speaker 2: and we simply cannot afford the current size of this system,
Speaker 2: she said in a Tuesday press release. That's why we're
Speaker 2: making changes to emergency assistance prioritization and transitioning our safety
Speaker 2: net to five day temporary respite centers. Self created problems,
Speaker 2: my friends, all because they want a virtue signal and
Speaker 2: not enforce the law. I'm out of time here. Thank
Speaker 2: you so much for listening. Have a great day. SDG