Speaker 1: Ready for.
Speaker 2: All right, twenty third day of September twenty twenty five,
Speaker 2: allegedly according to that thing we call a calendar. Anyway,
Speaker 2: it's the o'celly effect. As you heard in the intro
Speaker 2: there we are live on the stream. Most of you
Speaker 2: will not hear it there. It is a podcast also
Speaker 2: has been for more than a decade, and yet I
Speaker 2: say it every single time. Anyway, here we go for
Speaker 2: the handful of listeners we got, and I appreciate you,
Speaker 2: I really do. I want to thank Chris especially and
Speaker 2: Chris this week so you know, just saying it is
Speaker 2: what it is. And I still got to pay a
Speaker 2: phone bill. But we'll get to that tonight's purpose. We'll
Speaker 2: have Larry Hancock on later in the week. We'll definitely
Speaker 2: do the Friday night show. And I've even asked for
Speaker 2: some ideas about how to name a new short series
Speaker 2: which will not be the Ocelli effect, but literally ten
Speaker 2: minutes or less, or maybe five minutes or less. But
Speaker 2: I doubt I can squeeze anything into five minutes ten
Speaker 2: minutes or less. Okay, podcasts not connected at all to
Speaker 2: the Ocelli effect and what I've been doing, except that
Speaker 2: maybe I'll just tell personal anecdotes with a humorous twist,
Speaker 2: no matter what they are from my life. Even the
Speaker 2: most horrifying dark humor is still humor anyway. So I'm
Speaker 2: asking for names on that. If you want to, you
Speaker 2: can send me suggestions for what to name that short
Speaker 2: series of podcasts. I guess you could call them podcasts,
Speaker 2: but anyway, there'll definitely be shorts. We'll put them out
Speaker 2: on a bunch of different platforms and see if we
Speaker 2: can't refloat this thing called you know, o'celli, and see
Speaker 2: if I still can, I don't know, find a couple
Speaker 2: of new people to tune in, and yeah, give me
Speaker 2: a name, give me an idea, give me artwork, ideas, anything,
Speaker 2: because I'd like to build what you guys think is
Speaker 2: different about this show, those of you that do recognize
Speaker 2: there's still something different anyway, I guess we should get
Speaker 2: into the trenches of what doesn't seem to change. Although
Speaker 2: the news continues to pile up fast and furious, joining
Speaker 2: me tonight, missus. Oh and she hasn't used the the
Speaker 2: well the convention of communication that I'm using tonight before,
Speaker 2: but I think it won't be a problem. Hopefully, it's
Speaker 2: not too noisy, and if it is, it is all
Speaker 2: my fault because I gave her about five minutes to
Speaker 2: get used to it, so it is my fault. But anyway, Han,
Speaker 2: go ahead and speak and let's just experiment with the
Speaker 2: live air like we do.
Speaker 3: All right, Hello, everybody, there we go.
Speaker 2: It's been a minute since.
Speaker 3: I've come on, but with the recent going ons, I
Speaker 3: have decided that I have something to say, and I'm
Speaker 3: going to say it.
Speaker 2: Excellent. Look, I think it's I think it's goings on maybe,
Speaker 2: but look, I don't want to correct you, that's for sure,
Speaker 2: because I noticed how I'm questioning and not like correcting
Speaker 2: or like, hey, it's actually goings on, and because I
Speaker 2: question all of my reality around me at this point. Ongoings, ongoings.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, but it's it's usually I think it's goings
Speaker 2: on and it's not going going ons because the ons
Speaker 2: are not the multiple right, so the as is supposed
Speaker 2: to be. See, now, we could sit here and argue
Speaker 2: about this if you want. I'm honey, I'm doing a
Speaker 2: demonstration for them. Okay, just hang on a second. We
Speaker 2: can argue about this. We can look it up. We
Speaker 2: could figure out which side is fake about it and
Speaker 2: which one is not? And I might trust you know,
Speaker 2: Miriam Webster, and you might swear by Urban Dictionary, but
Speaker 2: at the end of the day, we you know, still
Speaker 2: got to live with each other. I don't know, is
Speaker 2: that A had a four hunt. Maybe it is, maybe
Speaker 2: it's not, And maybe nobody gives a crap I gotta say,
Speaker 2: And you know, yeah, there you go. Am I boring
Speaker 2: you on?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 2: Okay? Sometimes I think I am, you know, because I
Speaker 2: know I repeat myself. I run stuff by missus Oh
Speaker 2: on occasion. Uh, well, like every day I run stuff
Speaker 2: by her. I don't use all of it on air
Speaker 2: because usually she says stuff like don't don't don't don't
Speaker 2: don't say that on your show. Just don't don't say that.
Speaker 2: But but that's a true story. But anyway, enough out
Speaker 2: of me. Nobody wants to hear from me. And just
Speaker 2: just for the record, missus O's voice might be a
Speaker 2: little challenged because she's had, you know, some things that
Speaker 2: gave her sore throats over the past. I don't know month,
Speaker 2: but so have I And uh, it's just a thing.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's seasonal change. Maybe it's just we're sick people.
Speaker 2: I don't know it is what it is, But every
Speaker 2: time we get around those that have been recently vaccinated,
Speaker 2: I swear to God that is the only time people
Speaker 2: in my house really get sick, and especially the youngest
Speaker 2: of us. But then again, I guess there's the dogs, right,
Speaker 2: Maybe maybe the dogs are giving us things and whatnot. Well,
Speaker 2: we can imagine whatever we like. Anyway, before I get
Speaker 2: into the headlines, which I'd love to get comments from
Speaker 2: you on a couple of them. Honey, do you want
Speaker 2: me to start with your main feature or should we
Speaker 2: you know, just kind of jog through the headlines real quick.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking a jog through the headlines to warm you
Speaker 2: up and let you just comment on what I decided
Speaker 2: to just look at. Maybe a couple of sound clips
Speaker 2: just to get you rolling. But or do you want
Speaker 2: to get right to the topic at hand for you?
Speaker 3: No, the first way, okay, go through the headlines would
Speaker 3: be best.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, we'll do a few, all right, I won't
Speaker 2: I won't use them all. I'll let you, you know,
Speaker 2: because I think you have something to do in a
Speaker 2: little bit, so I'll let you, you know, take off
Speaker 2: and then you don't have to you get a break
Speaker 2: from listening to me, and you can go do something
Speaker 2: else if you want, or you can hang out up
Speaker 2: to you. I don't mind. But the the you know,
Speaker 2: the five little dogs might start barking too, so you
Speaker 2: never never know. Anyway, Let's see Ryan Ruth right, Ruth Roth,
Speaker 2: Ruth Ruth. I don't know. They keep saying Ruth, but
Speaker 2: r O U T h uh. You know, what do
Speaker 2: you do? He pled guilty today. Now, if you read different,
Speaker 2: let's call them different sides of the equation, different spins
Speaker 2: in the media based on left, right, center, libertarian, et cetera.
Speaker 2: The headline might sound a little different from one to
Speaker 2: the other, like the fact that Fox News like kind
Speaker 2: of went on for about an hour about him stabbing
Speaker 2: himself with the pen allegedly on his way out, and
Speaker 2: really really wanted to repeatedly show you his daughter storming
Speaker 2: away and then his son kind of calmly walking away.
Speaker 2: And I'm very confused, except that this is the guy
Speaker 2: took a shot at Trump a little ways back, and
Speaker 2: apparently you know the guy they found in the bushes.
Speaker 2: You remember this, n right? Yes, okay, so you got
Speaker 2: anything to say about this? He pled guilty, tried to
Speaker 2: stab himself with a pen in court, but then they
Speaker 2: brought him back in and finished the proceedings. His kids
Speaker 2: are not happy, but I'm a little confused because if
Speaker 2: he pled guilty, he's representing himself. His kids are angry
Speaker 2: at who him the court. The whole situation sounded like
Speaker 2: the daughter was saying stuff like we'll get you out
Speaker 2: of here. The sun kind of kept his mouth shut
Speaker 2: walking out. But I find the whole thing a little confusing,
Speaker 2: considering if he's the guy who did this, he's the
Speaker 2: guy they captured, and he's bleeding guilty representing himself, unless
Speaker 2: he's just really, really really mentally ill, which I kind
Speaker 2: of believe based on his arrest photos, you know, in
Speaker 2: which case his kids are saying, look, somebody help him
Speaker 2: because he's mentally ill. Maybe that's what they're angry about.
Speaker 2: But that's all I can make of it. What do
Speaker 2: you think about it? You saw part of the clip,
Speaker 2: and you know, again, maybe people forgot in the melee
Speaker 2: of madness that is the news speed, but indeed, this
Speaker 2: is the guy who took you know who was hiding
Speaker 2: in the bushes at the Florida golf course. So what
Speaker 2: are your thoughts on that one.
Speaker 3: Oh, well, I think I don't know why you would
Speaker 3: try to stab himself in the neck with a pan.
Speaker 5: I mean, I guess you could.
Speaker 6: Kill yourself that way.
Speaker 3: Was it to kill himself or postpone the hearing? What
Speaker 3: was the actual point?
Speaker 2: No, there wasn't postponing because they were already in process.
Speaker 2: It wasn't going to stop anything. I guess it could
Speaker 2: have made him have to go to the hospital. But
Speaker 2: quite frankly, and I love just to give you an
Speaker 2: idea of character in case you need to decode it.
Speaker 2: Missus Oh's first thought is I don't know if that's
Speaker 2: a good way to kill yourself or not. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, you got to pick a better method. Can
Speaker 2: you tell she lives with me anyway? Yeah? Okay, fine,
Speaker 2: But what other thoughts you got on this? Or should
Speaker 2: I move on? Yeah? It could probably move on?
Speaker 3: Okay, I do too much to say about that fiasco?
Speaker 2: All right? Fair enough? How about they get.
Speaker 3: Fox news Is on it for a while because they
Speaker 3: didn't have anything else to talk about at the moment,
Speaker 3: so they hovered over that for an.
Speaker 2: Home Well, everybody hovered on it for a minute, and
Speaker 2: of course had to be live because you know, if
Speaker 2: it bleeds, it leads, and if it's also politically charged,
Speaker 2: we are all over it. And that's every broadcast outlet
Speaker 2: and all the other stuff that actually matters, because who
Speaker 2: the hell actually watches broadcast TV anymore. I'm thinking it's
Speaker 2: not a majority. But I'll tell you what we'll do.
Speaker 2: I'm going to go through these things quicker so we
Speaker 2: don't linger too long. And you stop me when you
Speaker 2: want to comment, okay, and I'm mainly going to go
Speaker 2: with headlines, short comment, move along. That's going to be
Speaker 2: my pattern. And you tell me, wait a second, I
Speaker 2: want to say something, all right, or just break in
Speaker 2: and I'll shut up. Okay, okay, because as you can see, folks,
Speaker 2: I scripted this oh so well, So okay. Anyway, how
Speaker 2: about this. Trump says he now believes Ukraine can take
Speaker 2: back all of its land after meeting with Zolensky. That's
Speaker 2: according to the AP today, kind of a change in
Speaker 2: attitude regarding that. I mean, I thought Zolensky had none
Speaker 2: of the cards, so he went from, you have none
Speaker 2: of the cards too. Oh, by the way, I think
Speaker 2: they could take it all because Putin has now made
Speaker 2: me angry, reminds me of the angry ex going, I
Speaker 2: don't care. He's ugly anyway. I know I acted like
Speaker 2: I wanted him back for three months. But he's ugly
Speaker 2: and no good in bad how about that? And the
Speaker 2: new guy is great and you look at him and
Speaker 2: you know she lying anyway. Israel calls the UN push
Speaker 2: for pala Okay, Israel calls the UN push for palis
Speaker 2: Si statehood a charade, warns of quote consequences end quote
Speaker 2: for recognition moves. Now. This is coupled also with Trump's
Speaker 2: visit to the UN today to give a speech, which
Speaker 2: maybe I'll comment on later or maybe I'll play clips
Speaker 2: from later or not. We'll get there. And geez, what
Speaker 2: else happened? Oh, the French president Macrone got like caught
Speaker 2: in gridlock and they would not even move the blocked
Speaker 2: off stuff. See, you're in America, so the French president,
Speaker 2: we don't move traffic for you because we're waiting for Trump,
Speaker 2: who's late. And that is big lee And you've got
Speaker 2: to understand you are not the part of the hottest
Speaker 2: country in the world. So look, Fritchie, you can wait.
Speaker 2: And besides that, why don't you just pay attention before
Speaker 2: your wife slaps you again. Anyway, that went on in
Speaker 2: New York, just saying yeah, there was a bit of
Speaker 2: a phone call about it. Every everything's frozen for you
Speaker 2: told in NYC. Because of course he feels like Trump
Speaker 2: loves him too, because he's a cop stopped on the
Speaker 2: street by NYC police. Francis Macrone calls Trump something. But
Speaker 2: you know what, The headline was cut off, so you'll
Speaker 2: have to read it and there will be links in
Speaker 2: the show notes. Anyway, Should we get back to politically
Speaker 2: motivated terror? Maybe, but not just yet. What about political
Speaker 2: speech and all that? How about we play a clip
Speaker 2: or two that might be or might not be relevant.
Speaker 2: In a strange way, I found myself half liking, half
Speaker 2: liking how Ted Cruz described it. But I wonder if missus. Oh,
Speaker 2: and here's where I want you to play the home game. Hunt.
Speaker 2: Tell me what's wrong with this besides the fact that
Speaker 2: you're going to hear the voice of Ted Cruz, please, okay,
Speaker 2: be ready for this one. Hunt.
Speaker 4: He threatens explicitly, we're going to cancel ABC's license. We're
Speaker 4: gonna take him off the air, so ABC cannot broadcast anymore.
Speaker 4: And I gotta say, he threatens it. He says, we
Speaker 4: can do this the easy way, but we can do
Speaker 4: this the hard way.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: And I got to say, that's right out of good Fellows.
Speaker 4: That that that that that that's right out of a mafio.
Speaker 4: So coming into a bar going nice bye you have here,
Speaker 4: it'd be a shame of something happened to it.
Speaker 2: Okay, honey. So I don't know if you caught that?
Speaker 2: Was that nice and clear for you? You're I hear you.
Speaker 2: You're not speaking, but I hear the miss the air conditioner, honey. Okay,
Speaker 2: it could be that Missus can't hear. And now I'm
Speaker 2: feed okay, okay, restored. I shall restart it anyway. Now
Speaker 2: I gotta go back somehow, and uh, you know what
Speaker 2: I'll do. I'll take a quick break here while I
Speaker 2: straightened out the issue, because now I'm hearing missus O
Speaker 2: breathe and she doesn't realize it. Somehow she's not hearing me,
Speaker 2: but I'm hearing her quite well. Anyway, Let's take a
Speaker 2: quick break and the ol.
Speaker 1: Pet oh Chili dot Com.
Speaker 6: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 6: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 6: the context of the Times and reveals never before published
Speaker 6: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 6: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 6: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 6: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 6: Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 6: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 6: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 6: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 6: island aren't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 6: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 6: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 6: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 6: reveals why, and we'll show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 6: up against.
Speaker 5: For more information The War State.
Speaker 6: Dot Com the.
Speaker 2: Use expressed like caller schools. There anyone else who happens
Speaker 2: to get on the air of Jelly dot com who
Speaker 2: not necessarily reflect and we are not responsible for any
Speaker 2: stupidity which might exsue dot Com radio nuclear holocaust.
Speaker 7: You know what uranium is, right think of nuclear weapons
Speaker 7: and other things like lots of what uranium is right?
Speaker 7: Bad things things done with uranium leading some bad things,
Speaker 7: nuclear holocaust, What uranium is right? I agree, nuclear holocaust,
Speaker 7: nuclear holocaust, What uranium is right?
Speaker 6: They think of nuclear.
Speaker 7: Reponies and other things like dots of.
Speaker 5: Uranium is right?
Speaker 7: Things are done with uranimy in leading some bad things
Speaker 7: nuclear holocaust, nuclear hola holocaust, nuclear holocaust, nuclear holocaust, nuclear
Speaker 7: Go ahead, call.
Speaker 3: It about the JFA assassination.
Speaker 2: Right, Well, what do you want to know?
Speaker 3: Dy Baker's wild claim Oswald girlfriends he knew?
Speaker 2: Ruby and Barry answer weapons? Really, I imagine I could claim
Speaker 2: I have four wheels. It doesn't make me a wagon.
Speaker 3: But okayal on the building and trying to prevent the
Speaker 3: murder of John Kennedy.
Speaker 2: Come on, now, has a.
Speaker 6: Real effort on the DAFA assassination reclaim.
Speaker 2: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 2: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 2: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 2: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 2: well a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith
Speaker 2: Barry Baker in her own words from the author himself, signed,
Speaker 2: if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at k
Speaker 2: I A s JFK at aol dot com. It's a
Speaker 2: fun book and it action dissects the many, many fantastic claims.
Speaker 2: Judith Ary Baker, in her own.
Speaker 5: Words, thank you for the information.
Speaker 8: Do you like history? Real history that you were never
Speaker 8: taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Bombs in
Speaker 8: nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with
Speaker 8: new documentation never seen before that will open your eyes
Speaker 8: to events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam
Speaker 8: War Nuclear Bombs in nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen
Speaker 8: forty five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today
Speaker 8: at Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author
Speaker 8: Mike Swanson. Revelation through conversation.
Speaker 5: Here Shelly and you know from many years because you
Speaker 5: can't read her specializing.
Speaker 2: All right, that's quite enough of that, and we don't
Speaker 2: need the long intro. So here we go back with
Speaker 2: missus O who can now hear me again, So we're
Speaker 2: going to get to it right where we left off.
Speaker 2: And uh again, just to set this clip up, I
Speaker 2: think it's necessary to understand this might be one of
Speaker 2: those times where I'm not sure how to feel about
Speaker 2: what I'm hearing, and I want to get missus O's commentary.
Speaker 2: I know she's familiar with this political figure, and I
Speaker 2: know she's familiar with, you know, probably a general predisposition
Speaker 2: about who he is and all that. But from something
Speaker 2: called verdict with Ted Cruz, guess.
Speaker 4: Who he threatens explicitly We're going to cancel ABC's license.
Speaker 4: We're gonna take him off the air, so ABC cannot
Speaker 4: broadcast anymore. And I gotta say, he threatens it. He says,
Speaker 4: we can do this the easy way, but we can
Speaker 4: do this the hard way.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: And I got to say, that's right out of good Fellows.
Speaker 1: That that that that that's.
Speaker 4: Right out of a mafio.
Speaker 5: So coming into a bar.
Speaker 4: Going nice bye you have here, it'd be a shame
Speaker 4: of something happened to it. And I got to say, look,
Speaker 4: I understand, Jimmy Kimmel has mocked me so many times
Speaker 4: I cannot count.
Speaker 2: Okay, first of all the fact that Ted Cruz said,
Speaker 2: I understand, I call bs on that, but we'll leave
Speaker 2: it alone. Enough of my commentary on this, missus Zoe.
Speaker 2: I got two questions for you actually Okay, So the
Speaker 2: first one, I'm wondering if you know what it is
Speaker 2: my problems are with that particular portion of this really
Speaker 2: short sound clip of Ted Cruz talking about obviously the
Speaker 2: recent controversy with ABC, Jimmy can et cetera. What do
Speaker 2: you think my problems are with it? And then I'd
Speaker 2: like to know what you think of that so far,
Speaker 2: because he's not happy about the ABC move to get
Speaker 2: rid of Jimmy Kimmel in this clip, and I'm gonna
Speaker 2: play more and we'll see more why, but first, maybe
Speaker 2: tell tell people what you think my initial problems are
Speaker 2: with what I just heard, and then by all means,
Speaker 2: tell us what your ideas are about it.
Speaker 3: I'm going to say that the horribly fake Italian accent
Speaker 3: would be one trying to be.
Speaker 2: Not only is he trying to be a gangster okay
Speaker 2: or gangster depending uh, but I mean it's it's way
Speaker 2: beyond white, the way he warped it. I don't know
Speaker 2: what nationality he thinks that is. But you think there's
Speaker 2: anything else I have a problem, you know, and that
Speaker 2: and that few seconds of audio anything else.
Speaker 3: Well that that I think is the name one.
Speaker 2: And no that was it okay? So you think, no,
Speaker 2: it's okay, it's okay to be wrong, first of all,
Speaker 2: but secondly, maybe you're not wrong. You are, but it's okay.
Speaker 2: The thing is, it's okay to be wrong. Uh, he's
Speaker 2: quoting that's that's right out of Good Fellas. No it's not. No,
Speaker 2: it's not. Oh no, it's not it's you know what,
Speaker 2: it's not even out of either way. It's a generalized thing.
Speaker 2: I don't know that that's a quote out of any movie,
Speaker 2: but it's definitely not a quote out of Good Fellas.
Speaker 2: You know, I mean, is that sort of thing portrayed? Yes,
Speaker 2: but it's not straight out of Good Fels. I mean,
Speaker 2: get your movie references straight, ted, I mean before we
Speaker 2: even get into the rest of this anyway. All right,
Speaker 2: So so those might be my initial you know, things
Speaker 2: that make my ears perk up. But how about you?
Speaker 2: What did what did you hear? What was what was
Speaker 2: your impressions? Personally? Because we are not always in lockstep,
Speaker 2: and we don't share a brain. Although our brains appear
Speaker 2: to be connected, we don't share a brain on a
Speaker 2: lot of stuff, me and missus O. So I'm curious.
Speaker 2: Maybe she's got a different point of view on it.
Speaker 2: What are your thoughts.
Speaker 3: I can't stand here in him talk about anything.
Speaker 8: I find him to be irrelevant.
Speaker 2: Well, he's not irrelevant because he is a senator from Texas,
Speaker 2: he's a former presidential candidate. He's the guy that Trump
Speaker 2: tried to claim his dad was involved with Lee Harvey
Speaker 2: Oswald and they're part of assassinating a president once. Also,
Speaker 2: you know, lieon Ted Cruz. But he's all good now
Speaker 2: because you know.
Speaker 3: His life is a cow And well that's what Trump said,
Speaker 3: something to that effect.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was gonna call her.
Speaker 3: Like an ugly cow or something.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I see now. It's been so
Speaker 2: long and there's so many wild things that Trump has
Speaker 2: said about so many different people. It's hard to remember.
Speaker 2: But he definitely was not thinking that Ted Cruz's wife was,
Speaker 2: you know, maybe something that should be in the hottest
Speaker 2: country in the world because she you know, they used
Speaker 2: to have this website called Hot or Not and that's
Speaker 2: another part of Zuckerberg's history and the reality is on
Speaker 2: the Hot or Not website. Trump would have definitely clicked
Speaker 2: not for Ted Cruz's wife told him so, and even
Speaker 2: though Ted Cruz was you know, a little bit faux
Speaker 2: angry in public about it. He didn't really do anything
Speaker 2: to defend his wife's honor. A tough guy from Texas
Speaker 2: who also, you know, ran away during power outages when
Speaker 2: stuff was frozen and all that good stuff.
Speaker 1: I was going to bring that up.
Speaker 2: Well, the thing that struck you in me was not
Speaker 2: exactly the same thing that was up front with everybody else.
Speaker 2: It was the side note of oh, and by the way,
Speaker 2: here's his dog staring out a screen door, which means
Speaker 2: the help was allowed. So the help and the dog
Speaker 2: can freeze. We're going to cane kun f you? Ted
Speaker 2: Cruz said, I always found that remarkable. And okay, so
Speaker 2: enough of that, but a little more audio from Ted Cruz. Great,
Speaker 2: I know you don't like it, but bear with me.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he gonna try to be polish. Now what was
Speaker 3: he gonna do this?
Speaker 1: Son?
Speaker 2: But who am I trying to be? Oh?
Speaker 3: Is he going to try to be polish this time?
Speaker 2: What's he gonna do? Let's see? Oh, honey, it gets
Speaker 2: so much worse if you check out Ted Cruz trying
Speaker 2: to do movie impressions and stuff. I mean he tries
Speaker 2: to do Star Wars. I mean he tries to do,
Speaker 2: you know, I mean literally like Yoda and and it's
Speaker 2: the same kind of thing misquoted Mango. I mean, I'm
Speaker 2: trying to remember, but it's so rough. You could find
Speaker 2: a ton of examples of this online of Ted audio,
Speaker 2: not just on his podcast, which you know, people get
Speaker 2: on me when I miss place a word in a sentence,
Speaker 2: but holy crap. I mean, if this guy was presenting
Speaker 2: an SNL real field, you wouldn't even put him on
Speaker 2: the public access version of SNL in Boise. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's rough, okay, but look, I don't want to criticize.
Speaker 2: He's not there to be a comedian or an impressionist.
Speaker 2: But let's continue on with this clip related to and
Speaker 2: you know it's getting weird when I'm asking you to
Speaker 2: please honey bear with me while we listen to Ted Cruz.
Speaker 2: But let's take a listen anyway and give him a chance,
Speaker 2: because people are making different things out of this, as
Speaker 2: per usual, and I'm just wondering what you might make
Speaker 2: out of it now that I've gotten my personal highest
Speaker 2: objection out of the way, and that is butchering the
Speaker 2: Italian like I don't even know what ethnicity that is
Speaker 2: that to me sounds like what a guy in the
Speaker 2: eighties might try to make insert any ethnicity sound like,
Speaker 2: except it might be a white guy's version of Asian
Speaker 2: people from back then take double with yoll plasia. It
Speaker 2: would be a shame. You know, it doesn't sound like
Speaker 2: like Ted. Listen to me carefully. You know, hey, nice
Speaker 2: place you got here, I gotta say, would be a
Speaker 2: terrible shame. I mean, you got to change a cadence
Speaker 2: at least, you know. But okay, And I'm not an impression.
Speaker 2: I'm terrible at impressions. I once mocked Minnie Eastwood or
Speaker 2: whatever his name was on his radio show. I said, dude,
Speaker 2: you're doing a terrible Italian accent, and he said, you
Speaker 2: go ahead and do one. And I was like, this
Speaker 2: is the weirdest thing. I'm not a comedian, not trying
Speaker 2: to do it, and of course I'm going to do
Speaker 2: it badly because he was trying to do like his
Speaker 2: godfather thing. You know. It was like, you know, DoD
Speaker 2: Corley Old, and I'm like, oh, you know, dude. You know,
Speaker 2: it's sort of like when you watch somebody I don't
Speaker 2: know run down the street and they didn't expect to
Speaker 2: run and they haven't run in fifteen years. It looks awkward,
Speaker 2: except this guy's supposed to be a comedian all the time,
Speaker 2: so you know, any impression shouldn't be that awkward. Anyway.
Speaker 2: I digress and double digress. So let's get out of
Speaker 2: away on this and go back to Ted Cruz and
Speaker 2: listen to him.
Speaker 4: Okay, the corporate media, they are dishonest, they are liars.
Speaker 4: I hate what Jimmy Kimmel said. I am thrilled that
Speaker 4: he was fired. But let me tell you, if the
Speaker 4: government gets in the business of saying, we don't care
Speaker 4: say what you the media have said, We're going to
Speaker 4: ban you from the airwaves if you don't say what
Speaker 4: we like, that will end up bad for conservatives. It
Speaker 4: reminds me of you and I are both fans of
Speaker 4: The Lord of the Rings Dry R.
Speaker 5: Tolkien.
Speaker 4: It reminds me of like the Ring of Power, and
Speaker 4: it is so attractive. It's sort of like conservatives saying, wait, wait,
Speaker 4: if we have government, we have power, we can ban
Speaker 4: the media. Let me tell you what will happen going
Speaker 4: down this road. There will come a time when a
Speaker 4: Democrat wins again, wins the White House, they will get
Speaker 4: rid of every Democrats see it's a conservative, they'll get
Speaker 4: rid of ever podcast, So get rid of it.
Speaker 2: They will silence us.
Speaker 4: They will use this power, and they will use it ruthlessly.
Speaker 4: And that is stagers. And by the way, in the
Speaker 4: Biden administration, they tried to go after and revoke Fox's
Speaker 4: license because they didn't like and they say everything they
Speaker 4: on Fox his hate speech. I'm sure they say everything
Speaker 4: you and I say is hate speech, is misfirmation. They've
Speaker 4: defined anything counter to the leftist narrative as misinformation. Now,
Speaker 4: we just talked about Jimmy Kimla was lying. But you
Speaker 4: know what, it's interesting Brendan said, well, gosh, they slandered
Speaker 4: They slandered Charli Kirk and his family. You know what,
Speaker 4: if they slandered him, there's already a remedy. There's a
Speaker 4: remedy of defamation. ABC could be sued and by the way,
Speaker 4: you get a defamation laws you could pay millions of dollars.
Speaker 4: Let that process play out.
Speaker 2: I think it is.
Speaker 4: Unbelievably dangerous for government to put itself in the position
Speaker 4: of saying we're going to decide what speech we like
Speaker 4: and what we don't, and we're going to threaten to
Speaker 4: take you off air if we don't like what you're saying.
Speaker 2: Okay, now I'm done playing Ted Cruz. Okay, and I'm
Speaker 2: going to close that link so I don't even accidentally
Speaker 2: hit it again and play it again. But food for
Speaker 2: thought there, So tell me what your thoughts are on
Speaker 2: what you just heard, and you know, you just give
Speaker 2: me that and let's see, let's see where we go
Speaker 2: from there. Oh but first I got to apologize because
Speaker 2: it's sped up a little because I have the TikTok
Speaker 2: version of it, and they're trying to cram it into
Speaker 2: a shorter video. So this is one of those tricks
Speaker 2: they do now and why some things sound so unnatural.
Speaker 2: They just speed it up and figure you won't notice
Speaker 2: and it'll sound just as good anyway, so they can
Speaker 2: cram it in for time and make sure it fits
Speaker 2: what they need for the algorithm to share. Because this
Speaker 2: is Ted Cruise's people sharing this and then other people
Speaker 2: picking up on it, and it's going everywhere. And technically speaking,
Speaker 2: this is from the TikTok of Bullwark, the Bullwark Media,
Speaker 2: which I don't even know if they're connected to the
Speaker 2: you know, magazine or online publication, whatever you want to
Speaker 2: call it. I have no idea, but this is clearly
Speaker 2: somebody else sharing a portion of Ted Cruise's podcast, which
Speaker 2: was already clipped and shared by Ted Cruse and his podcast.
Speaker 2: So you know, it is the original clip, but it's
Speaker 2: sped up a little, and yet it is secondhand, but
Speaker 2: it doesn't appear to be edited. The guy who talks
Speaker 2: fast behind him sounds especially ridiculous, that's right, Bill, I
Speaker 2: mean like Alex Jones on crack. Well, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: that's Alex Jones every day, Alex Joones on crack and
Speaker 2: meth at the same time. So what are your thoughts
Speaker 2: on this? They don't really have any, Okay, so you
Speaker 2: want to move along, But I'm going to drop a
Speaker 2: couple of quick thoughts here. First of all, he has
Speaker 2: no objection to just you know, hey, in general, the
Speaker 2: government shouldn't be involved in speech. Now, a defender of
Speaker 2: Ted Kruz will say, you'd ling Chuck. You just said
Speaker 2: he has a problem with it. No, he has a
Speaker 2: problem with the idea that strategically it's an issue, okay,
Speaker 2: because Democrats will do this, they have done it before,
Speaker 2: and they will be merciless about it or whatever language
Speaker 2: he used. He's not concerned about the overall damage to
Speaker 2: the first Amendments. I want you to take notice of that.
Speaker 2: That's not the primary issued him. The issue to him
Speaker 2: is that, you know what, this will get used against
Speaker 2: us because if we did it, they'll say we can
Speaker 2: do it better, which is not what the Democrats usually do.
Speaker 2: Both parties try to retaliate and counter retaliate all the
Speaker 2: time to different levels of successful rhetorical victories. But Yike's
Speaker 2: Cruise is not concerned at all about that. Now here's
Speaker 2: the funny thing to me. This guy is basically giving
Speaker 2: you a very sloppy AI version of what he's supposed
Speaker 2: to be. I'm wondering if this is AI, because what
Speaker 2: is Ted Cruz? If you do an AI overview on
Speaker 2: Ted Cruise, whether it's groc or you know any of them,
Speaker 2: or you start to search them online and start to
Speaker 2: oh my god, read a little, what do you think?
Speaker 2: Comes up? Primarily as like what is Ted Cruz outside
Speaker 2: of the back? Like remove that he's a politician, he's
Speaker 2: Raphael Cruz's son. What is Ted Cruz known for? If
Speaker 2: you take away his politics? Honey, what do you think
Speaker 2: he is.
Speaker 3: Just a regular everyday person. Okay, you take away all
Speaker 3: that stuff not true.
Speaker 2: Here's what is true, and you're gonna love this. Here's
Speaker 2: the bullet points for his credentials. And maybe you'll catch
Speaker 2: on to why I find this so ironic. An elite
Speaker 2: education that's in bold letters here, this is literally my
Speaker 2: AI had just pulled up. Now, elite education. Cruz graduated
Speaker 2: cum laude from Princeton University and magna cum laude from
Speaker 2: Harvard Law School. What did he do after that? Well,
Speaker 2: he had a Supreme Court clerkship. He served as a
Speaker 2: law clerk for Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court from nineteen ninety six to nineteen ninety seven. Okay,
Speaker 2: he was the Texas Solicitor General. Okay, that's his political stuff. Sorry,
Speaker 2: as a princident, that's you know. As a student at Princeton,
Speaker 2: Cruz wrote his senior thesis on the ninth and tenth
Speaker 2: Amendments titled Clipping the Wings of Angels. Okay, adjunct professorship. Okay,
Speaker 2: so you get the point. He's a senator, he's been
Speaker 2: highly educated, all that, and what is the main point
Speaker 2: that's brought up first as to who this guy is
Speaker 2: if you just landed on planet Earth, Raphael which you
Speaker 2: know is his real first name, Ted Cruz, because remember
Speaker 2: you know Raphael Cruise is his dad, right, No, Raphael
Speaker 2: Ted Cruise is actually his name, is an American politician
Speaker 2: and attorney. Okay, so now I say put the politician
Speaker 2: side apart. Widely recognized as a pre eminent or no,
Speaker 2: excuse me, prominent, Sorry I read the wrong word. Prominent
Speaker 2: conservative constitutional lawyer with extensive legal experience. So if you
Speaker 2: just landed on planet Earth, Ted Cruz is a constitutional
Speaker 2: lawyer who barely touches the Constitution. In the discussion about
Speaker 2: pre speech, I just want that to sink in. That's
Speaker 2: all I'm asking. I'm not even asking for judgment here.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying I want you to take notice that
Speaker 2: the strategy, how it could be used against them later,
Speaker 2: the politics of it is really what the constitutional lawyer
Speaker 2: here is after, because he put it up front, and
Speaker 2: I'm assuming he's intentional in the way he delivers his
Speaker 2: ideas and speeches, because that is actually the primary job
Speaker 2: of a lawyer is to write a story and to
Speaker 2: be able to tell it to either a jury or
Speaker 2: a judge in order to convince them that their version
Speaker 2: of the story is the most correct. I mean, that's
Speaker 2: a good way to describe what a lawyer does. You
Speaker 2: know what I'm saying. And anyway, I think I've belabored
Speaker 2: this enough. But now that I've said all that to you,
Speaker 2: do you have any other thoughts on it? Or shall
Speaker 2: we move on?
Speaker 4: I didn't know he was.
Speaker 2: That educated. Yeah, highly educated constitutional lawyer. Yeah, I had
Speaker 2: no idea. Okay, look I said before, Yeah, fair enough,
Speaker 2: go ahead, Okay, no, no, hey, if that's all there is,
Speaker 2: that's all. There is other headlines that went on just
Speaker 2: so you know, all right, and this is in the
Speaker 2: just so you know category, and stop me if you
Speaker 2: want to talk on. But here we go. News outlets
Speaker 2: prepare fight against Pentagon's demand for press to sign quote
Speaker 2: pledge end quote restricting reporting. That is something that's gone
Speaker 2: out in various versions out there, Just letting you know.
Speaker 2: This is a condensed sort of version of the headlines
Speaker 2: of the articles that I've read for background research. Today.
Speaker 2: Israel decries Hollywood, decries Hollywood boycott while silencing its own
Speaker 2: critical filmmakers. So Israel got in on the whole Jimmy
Speaker 2: Kimmel thing. And they're saying, how dare you try and
Speaker 2: censor people who are creatives in Hollywood? But they're censoring
Speaker 2: their own creatives over there, and filmmakers and news because
Speaker 2: don't give us bad coverage And kind of sounds familiar anyway.
Speaker 2: The US attacked Venezuelan boats it says are carrying drugs.
Speaker 2: Is Venezuela sending drugs to the US? Asks a PolitiFact article,
Speaker 2: And that's something that you might have not noticed happened
Speaker 2: because we're arguing about how the house that Mouse built
Speaker 2: fired one of the guys who does a pretty mild show.
Speaker 2: Even though Jimmy Kimmel is Italian, he doesn't really carry
Speaker 2: the Italian attitude and his last name isn't either, so
Speaker 2: you know, just letting you know. He also went and
Speaker 2: apparently filed for his right of return to Italy recently
Speaker 2: just because of this controversy. So I don't know if
Speaker 2: he overreacted privately or not, but it sounds like it
Speaker 2: to me. Any thoughts on that hunt or should I
Speaker 2: keep going? Okay, what else do we have? Okay? Politically
Speaker 2: motivated terrorist killers data sources and methodology. That is something
Speaker 2: that was published a little ways back by the CATO. Okay,
Speaker 2: the Cato Institute, and CATO, by the way, is not
Speaker 2: a before anybody gets crazy, it's not one a conservative
Speaker 2: directly or liberal establishment that you know, creates scholarly bs
Speaker 2: to support its own preconceived notions based on a political side,
Speaker 2: because they're literally supposed to be libertarian, and quite frankly
Speaker 2: libertarian as of the past twenty years or so has
Speaker 2: kind of become code for right wing just a little weird.
Speaker 2: But the Cato Institute, why do I bring this up?
Speaker 2: Because that and a study done by the Department of
Speaker 2: Justice is something that was scrubbed from the website recently.
Speaker 2: When the argument about who is the violent ones on
Speaker 2: the left or the right became a publicly traded talking
Speaker 2: point out there, they decided just coincidentally to scrub the
Speaker 2: data that was actually collected by that study and by
Speaker 2: their own work on the Department of Justice website. They
Speaker 2: literally removed it. It's gone, and you can follow up
Speaker 2: on many a different article about that if you'd like.
Speaker 2: I noticed also a slight resurgence of the pagan threat, okay,
Speaker 2: and who they're talking about. The pagan threat is obviously
Speaker 2: the threat to Christianity and Oh, by the way, I'm
Speaker 2: getting very tired at how I'm being harangued because I
Speaker 2: know I'm not the only podcaster being spammed to death
Speaker 2: by a faith counselor of some sort to the Trump
Speaker 2: administration who desperately wants to get on every podcast he
Speaker 2: can to explain how Christianity is under attack. I just
Speaker 2: want you to know that that there's somebody out there
Speaker 2: that is more aggressive about getting booked on a podcast
Speaker 2: than the two thousand and one Judith Barry Baker at
Speaker 2: this point, because believe me, believe me, and I am
Speaker 2: the preeminent, rare person to talk to about how Christians
Speaker 2: are under attack. And I say, listen, Grandpa, if you want,
Speaker 2: turn on Fox News and wait twenty minutes, cause I
Speaker 2: don't need this guy's a guest. You can get that elsewhere. Anyway.
Speaker 2: I have a couple of other clips regarding comedy, and
Speaker 2: some of these things are comedy to me, and some
Speaker 2: of them are comedy to you. Are you ready for
Speaker 2: that or do you want to talk about the issue
Speaker 2: you have lined up that you wanted to bring onto
Speaker 2: the show. And I definitely was going to cover it,
Speaker 2: but I'd rather that you go through it a little
Speaker 2: and talk about it. Are you ready for that? Or
Speaker 2: shall we do a little more comedy?
Speaker 1: Why don't you finish?
Speaker 3: Check but you wanted to do on that art, and
Speaker 3: then I'll bring up my couple of things.
Speaker 2: You got it? Because again I'm so well scripted, folks,
Speaker 2: see how seamless it is. So here we go. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna give you a choice. We can hear from a
Speaker 2: dead guy. We can hear from a guy that I
Speaker 2: did really honestly thought was dead, or we can hear
Speaker 2: about a guy that well is making comparisons between dead
Speaker 2: and allegedly dead people in history, and history could be
Speaker 2: anything from yesterday to you know, ten thousand years ago.
Speaker 2: So keep an open mind there. But which dead thing
Speaker 2: do you want to play with? Honey? How about that?
Speaker 2: I'm trying to do comedy here?
Speaker 3: Okay?
Speaker 2: What can I do?
Speaker 1: So ten thing?
Speaker 2: I don't know? How about what was the first one? Okay?
Speaker 2: I know, because I talked so much, I'll make you
Speaker 2: forget the first thing I said. It happens all the time,
Speaker 2: dead comedian. Either either we are talking, we're gonna hear
Speaker 2: from a guy who is dead. Okay, two guys. One
Speaker 2: I thought was dead because he is a prominent figure
Speaker 2: that he's just one of those guys that that's the
Speaker 2: guy's still alive. Uh. And the third one would be
Speaker 2: a young man comparing two people that are dead in
Speaker 2: history one way or another. One of them, though I
Speaker 2: did hint, is long dead and the other one is
Speaker 2: recently dead. So which dead thing do you want to
Speaker 2: play with.
Speaker 1: The third one?
Speaker 2: See? Now, if she wanted to be funny, she could
Speaker 2: have said, well, your head, because your brain's dead. She
Speaker 2: could have insulted me like that, and that would be
Speaker 2: a jersey thing, and I wouldn't even be mad punny
Speaker 2: I was, depending on how you delivered it. But no,
Speaker 2: let's do this, okay. And I picked up this clip
Speaker 2: because I saw an evangelical talking about Trump versus Jesus,
Speaker 2: and in some cases they talk about Trump is Jesus
Speaker 2: and various other things that I thought would have been blasphemy,
Speaker 2: but this is. But no, he's not going to talk
Speaker 2: about Trump necessarily, because I'm telling you the Remember I
Speaker 2: told you he's going to compare or contrast or maybe
Speaker 2: both a dead guy from a long time ago and
Speaker 2: a man who died recently. Okay, okay, okay, let's see what.
Speaker 2: We obviously are not going to play the whole clip,
Speaker 2: but we will get through some of it, even though
Speaker 2: I think the whole clip might only be a minute long.
Speaker 2: Let's see how we do. And I'm going to stop
Speaker 2: it when it stops or whatever, and I just want
Speaker 2: to turn it over to you and tell me what
Speaker 2: you want to say or say. Let's move on and
Speaker 2: we'll pick another dead thing to play with. Okay, all right,
Speaker 2: this is my comedy here. What can I do? I
Speaker 2: told you guys, I'm not funny, but a couple of
Speaker 2: people insisted, no, I think you are. Well, this is
Speaker 2: my comedy. Okay. Anyway, missus O knows because she knows
Speaker 2: how to make groaning noises too. Anyway, look, I keep
Speaker 2: opening all sorts of well you do make groaning noises
Speaker 2: and the sigh when I say certain things, you go,
Speaker 2: I mean, you might not know it, but you do
Speaker 2: that when you're like, oh God, here he goes again.
Speaker 2: And you know. Anyway, let's just get to the clip.
Speaker 2: Enough bad of me.
Speaker 9: Christian nationalists have taken Trump as their new Christ because
Speaker 9: he's everything.
Speaker 2: The first one was not. Jesus was poor. Trump is rich.
Speaker 9: Jesus was meek, Trump is a bully. Jesus lost, and
Speaker 9: Trump is obsessed with winning.
Speaker 2: Okay, now I'm pausing because we're about halfway through the clip,
Speaker 2: and I say in my mind that somebody might still
Speaker 2: be on the fence about what this guy is really
Speaker 2: working up to. What is the punchline here? Okay, let's
Speaker 2: just remember Jesus is you know, meek, and what was it? Oh,
Speaker 2: Jesus is poor, Trump is rich. You know, Jesus takes
Speaker 2: the l Trump is obsessed with winning. Right, He's giving
Speaker 2: you serious contrasts here and saying, but modern people are
Speaker 2: you know, putting him in that christ like position and
Speaker 2: also recently putting other people in christ Like positions. Well, anyway,
Speaker 2: maybe I misread the clip here, but nonetheless I think
Speaker 2: it's a solid point that this is a Christian guy.
Speaker 2: Let's see, he's another guy from Texas and he's clearly,
Speaker 2: you know, a very Christian guy, and he's talking about
Speaker 2: Christian nationalism, which is relevant to Charlie Kirk who was
Speaker 2: a self proclaimed Christian comma nationalist and didn't want to
Speaker 2: be labeled as a Christian nationalist, you know, no comma,
Speaker 2: but not the less. It's relevant, So let's continue on
Speaker 2: with the clip and then I'll, like, I say, get
Speaker 2: your entire view on this, But I wanted to pause
Speaker 2: and just for a second look at this with Alle.
Speaker 2: And this is a clean cut guy. You know, he's
Speaker 2: not wearing a tie, but his shirt is you know,
Speaker 2: freshly open, and he's wearing a suit and he's on
Speaker 2: a Dais somewhere. And that's all I need to tell
Speaker 2: you about the visuals. Trump is obsessed with winning, he said,
Speaker 2: And we'll continue on from there.
Speaker 9: I honestly think that if Donald Trump and Jade Vance
Speaker 9: met Jesus today, they would ridicule him as a single.
Speaker 5: Childless hippie.
Speaker 9: And in fact, in fact, Donald Trump Junior explicitly rejected
Speaker 9: Jesus's sermon on the Mount.
Speaker 5: He said, turning the other cheek has quote gotten us nothing.
Speaker 9: How did we get to the point where loving your
Speaker 9: enemy is weak and loving your neighbor is woke?
Speaker 5: Christian nationalists?
Speaker 2: Okay, that is the whole clip. Your thoughts, missus?
Speaker 1: Oh well, who is that?
Speaker 2: First of all? Uh? You know what, he's a prominent
Speaker 2: Christian guy who is out there and has made other statements.
Speaker 2: I'm not even gonna name him. I'm gonna give you
Speaker 2: guys the clip, you can go research it for yourselves.
Speaker 2: But it is a rare voice that's being shared around
Speaker 2: in the social and whatever anti social media circles you want,
Speaker 2: and it's causing a stir in certain micro categories. But
Speaker 2: I find it interesting. Okay, go ahead. What are your
Speaker 2: thoughts though?
Speaker 3: I mean, I think it's yeah, good, I don't agree
Speaker 3: with it.
Speaker 2: You don't agree with it, well I did.
Speaker 3: Well, Now let me take that back. Most of his
Speaker 3: points are are correct, but I don't know the point.
Speaker 3: What's the point? Like?
Speaker 2: Why are we playing that we see? Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 2: When I don't give you context for who it is,
Speaker 2: so we don't attach it to an identity. And I
Speaker 2: give you very few details I want you to notice.
Speaker 2: And I'm not trying to pick on you because I
Speaker 2: see this everywhere. But yeah, people just have a judgment
Speaker 2: about what they're hearing. And look at what the judgment is. Now,
Speaker 2: what he's basically said here is that you know, you're
Speaker 2: comparing Trump to Jesus. And I don't see how this
Speaker 2: works basically, and Christian nationalists do this, but he's a
Speaker 2: Christian guy and he is definitely you know of that,
Speaker 2: you know of that side one way or another. Uh.
Speaker 2: And I'm trying to be as vague as possible here,
Speaker 2: but just his words alone, if you just judge the
Speaker 2: words and you just judge the content, what is he
Speaker 2: actually saying? And let's let's just go over part of
Speaker 2: it again.
Speaker 9: Real fast have taken Trump as their new Christ, Okay.
Speaker 2: Christian nationalists have taken Trump as their new Christ. Okay.
Speaker 2: So there's an odd statement because you know, he's supposed
Speaker 2: to be Trump the infallible. He's probably not talking to
Speaker 2: the actual pope himself and talking to the pope's brother
Speaker 2: when he wants to make contact because he's a little jealous.
Speaker 2: Because I really think when somebody put out that ai
Speaker 2: picture of him as pope, when the last pope, you know,
Speaker 2: was no longer in the position, I think he really
Speaker 2: thought somehow he could become pope, you know, because remember
Speaker 2: there was a picture of him in the pope outfit. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and people were cheering it on like that's right, should
Speaker 2: be Pope Donald? And yeah, and also Donald is the
Speaker 2: new Christ figure. They've attached him to all sorts of
Speaker 2: biblical stuff, is all I'm saying. Anyway, back to this
Speaker 2: guy's again, just looking at the points what he's saying
Speaker 2: not necessarily who he is. I mean, I think I
Speaker 2: accidentally already told Jesus in Texas or whatever. But it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter.
Speaker 3: Okay, well I still don't know who he is, and no,
Speaker 3: it doesn't matter. But it blows my mind that he's
Speaker 3: even being compared to Jesus Christ or being considered then
Speaker 3: the new coming of one.
Speaker 2: Well, he's definitely the Messiah in a religious order, but
Speaker 2: outside of that, Yeah, you got trouble with the comparisons,
Speaker 2: and the guy's going to tell you.
Speaker 9: Why, because he's everything. The first one was not. Jesus
Speaker 9: was poor. Trump is rich, Jesus was meek, Trump is
Speaker 9: a bully. Jesus lost, and Trump is obsessed with winning.
Speaker 2: Okay, So I got a few problems with this because
Speaker 2: according to you know, dogma, Christ won by being crucified
Speaker 2: because he you know, listened, he gave up himself and
Speaker 2: he therefore cleared all of our sins. Right, so he
Speaker 2: won even though he died. So I don't know why
Speaker 2: he's saying that Jesus lost, right, although it is tough
Speaker 2: to say you won when you you know, if you
Speaker 2: watch the passion of the Christ, a little difficult to
Speaker 2: call that guy winner Grant, cavisl or whatever. But in
Speaker 2: the order of things, he is the winner. He's always
Speaker 2: the victor, no matter how it turns out. But anyway,
Speaker 2: Jesus is poor and Trump is rich. Well, there's a
Speaker 2: problem there, because riches are not merely just measured in
Speaker 2: gold and such. According to Christians, faith's own you know, literature,
Speaker 2: let's say, your own holy book. That would not be
Speaker 2: the attitude to take. But he is right about a
Speaker 2: few things here while being wrong. Also, Trump is a bully,
Speaker 2: and Jesus was meek. Well, I don't think it was
Speaker 2: so meek when he went over flipping over the tables
Speaker 2: and releasing the animals in the temple when he was pissed.
Speaker 2: Sounds to me like, actually, you know, even the name
Speaker 2: that he says that they would ascribe to Jesus would
Speaker 2: probably be inaccurate, because I don't think they'd call him
Speaker 2: a childless hippie alone. They'd probably try and make him
Speaker 2: a member of the new Antifa. And in this case,
Speaker 2: the new Antifa would be the emerging religion according to
Speaker 2: their story of Christianity from the Roman perspective. You know,
Speaker 2: those people that had emperors, and you know, they would
Speaker 2: have to tell you, remember thou art mortal when approaching
Speaker 2: him and all that kind of stuff, because the emperor
Speaker 2: was supposed to be beyond that. But just saying anyway,
Speaker 2: let's continue on with the comparisons real quick, because I
Speaker 2: think he's off here when you take his words at
Speaker 2: face value. I get his point, though, but I think
Speaker 2: he's off in a few ways. Let's see.
Speaker 9: I honestly think that if Donald Trump and Jade Vance
Speaker 9: met Jesus today, they would ridicule him as a single,
Speaker 9: childless Hippi. And in fact, in fact, Donald Trump Junior
Speaker 9: explicitly rejected Jesus' sermon on the Mount.
Speaker 5: He said, turning to the other cheek, has quote gotten
Speaker 5: us nothing?
Speaker 2: Okay, because again we're using the wrong measuring stick. But
Speaker 2: although Donald Trump Junior did say that, but yeah, go ahead,
Speaker 2: you have something to say.
Speaker 1: Were those of the controversial.
Speaker 3: Things that Junior said that Kirk's memorial service, that people all.
Speaker 4: Up in it up for her?
Speaker 2: No, I don't think that was it. You know, the
Speaker 2: big line there was I disagree with Erica because she said,
Speaker 2: as she forgives the assassin of Charlie. But I'm sorry
Speaker 2: Charlie's going to be mad at me. Eric is mad
Speaker 2: at me. I don't care. I don't care. I hate
Speaker 2: my enemies. That was the big smoot. But that was
Speaker 2: Donald Senior. No, that was senior, that was our president. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Junior said something too that. Yeah, I'm sure people upset. Well,
Speaker 2: he was constantly saying. He constantly says stuff that makes
Speaker 2: me shake my head and scratch it simultaneously. But anyway, well, yeah,
Speaker 2: go ahead.
Speaker 3: One of them said that his I think it was Eric,
Speaker 3: said that he considered that his father considered Kirk his
Speaker 3: second son, which is hilarious because Eric is the second
Speaker 3: son totally just like scooped himself under the rug and
Speaker 3: put this Kirk dude in front of him.
Speaker 2: Well wow, and please allow me know what you just said, right,
Speaker 2: and please allow me to make an eighties common joke
Speaker 2: and probably would now be called a dad joke. He's
Speaker 2: the second son that we know of Eric, Uh, you know,
Speaker 2: because who knows Donald Trump was you know, in more
Speaker 2: than one bed and admits to having cheated on all
Speaker 2: of his wives. So could there be other little Trump's
Speaker 2: out there? Possibly just saying you know, I mean, but
Speaker 2: but yeah, Eric himself goes, Yeah, forget about me. This
Speaker 2: guy's the second son, not a secondary son. But yeah,
Speaker 2: why not because it fits perfectly with with Eric, you know,
Speaker 2: I mean, he he is so so deserving of being
Speaker 2: you know, the the what the co the co chairman
Speaker 2: of the Trump crypto Empire, right that that's that's because
Speaker 2: that's what he's doing now. He's running the Trump crypto
Speaker 2: Empire along with his brother in some foreign country. I
Speaker 2: think it might be in the Middle East. Yeah, go ahead, and.
Speaker 3: There's a statue or something of Trump, this big old
Speaker 3: statue of Trump holding like a bitcoin or something going
Speaker 3: up somewhere.
Speaker 2: It's like, oh my god.
Speaker 3: You know these things are all worthy that you'll go
Speaker 3: We're gonna take down all the other ones.
Speaker 2: Right, these things are all worthy of consideration. But anyway,
Speaker 2: let's move on, because what dead thing do you want
Speaker 2: to play with next? The guy I thought was dead
Speaker 2: or the guy that I'm pretty certain is dead, And
Speaker 2: you know which, which one shall we play with next?