1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,040
Speaker 1: We've been talking a lot about AI on the show.

2
00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:07,400
Speaker 2: Last week, we did we did our experiment with Souno

3
00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:12,080
dot com where we made some tracks, and apparently it

4
00:00:12,160 --> 00:00:14,800
is even easier than I could have imagined.

5
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:20,559
Speaker 3: Too easy, stupid easy. Yeah, like really really too easy.

6
00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:22,440
If you didn't hear the show last week, seriously, go

7
00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:24,519
back and listen to it. Yeah, we didn't give it

8
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,480
a ton, just some basic info and it actually spit

9
00:00:28,519 --> 00:00:35,039
out some decent music. And it's concerning because how do

10
00:00:35,079 --> 00:00:38,600
you know that's AI? Right, Like, you need AI to

11
00:00:38,679 --> 00:00:43,119
find out that it's AI, and then what music did

12
00:00:43,159 --> 00:00:46,240
they use to learn that? You're right? Yeah, nothing coming

13
00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:48,799
out of AI. Didn't have a human On the other end,

14
00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:51,960
they're they're taking all of the art, all of the

15
00:00:52,119 --> 00:00:57,079
creations from music genres across the spectrum, from artists everywhere,

16
00:00:57,759 --> 00:01:01,280
throwing that in a computer and having it spit It's

17
00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:06,719
to me, it's still using other people's work. So that's

18
00:01:06,799 --> 00:01:09,599
my my. There has to be a way to tell

19
00:01:09,640 --> 00:01:14,519
the difference between real human creativity and AI.

20
00:01:15,719 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 2: Yeah, if you go back and listen to last week's show,

21
00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:20,040
you can check out some of the tracks that we created,

22
00:01:20,079 --> 00:01:22,719
just with a simple prompt and what it was able

23
00:01:22,719 --> 00:01:25,439
to spit out. Suno dot Com is a service and

24
00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:28,599
they're actually they're free. The free version of the service

25
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,079
is pretty generous. They give you, you know, you can make

26
00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:33,879
ten songs a month, which might not sound like a lot,

27
00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:36,159
but some of these services, you know, they they try

28
00:01:36,159 --> 00:01:38,159
to get you into a free trial and get you

29
00:01:38,439 --> 00:01:40,959
hooked on it so then you'll be willing to pay

30
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:41,560
for it every month.

31
00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:42,959
Speaker 1: But what Suno does is.

32
00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,879
Speaker 2: The free option that they offer is actually pretty good.

33
00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,760
But if you want to hear, so you can hear.

34
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:52,079
What we did live on the air was something we'd

35
00:01:52,079 --> 00:01:53,959
wanted to get to for a while, just kind of

36
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,879
an experiment of creating tracks using one of these AI services,

37
00:01:57,879 --> 00:02:00,959
and we created several and and of course I did

38
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:03,680
put the the mc hammer distracts because of course my

39
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:08,000
long running feud with mc hammer going back six years now,

40
00:02:08,199 --> 00:02:11,759
long time listeners, we'll know the six years now. Yes

41
00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,439
we did, uh, I did the po. We ended up

42
00:02:15,479 --> 00:02:17,960
making four distracts using Souno dot com and I did

43
00:02:18,039 --> 00:02:21,840
post them all on YouTube as well, so in your

44
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:25,280
face Hammer, it's yeah, that's right.

45
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:30,879
Speaker 3: So people did an article recently about Celine Dion uh huh,

46
00:02:31,159 --> 00:02:34,319
So the AI is crossing all gendres as far as

47
00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:38,240
what it's doing. But apparently Selene Dion did an Instagram

48
00:02:38,319 --> 00:02:45,120
post this past Friday. Just yesterday calling out AI and

49
00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:49,759
saying that her voice has been allegedly used in an

50
00:02:49,879 --> 00:02:53,280
unsanctioned way that she did not approve of. That it

51
00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:56,719
sounds like it's her giving a performance, But it's not

52
00:02:57,960 --> 00:03:00,639
pretty upsetting when you can consider the fact that, I mean,

53
00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:03,680
for one thing, she's an amazing artist, but this woman

54
00:03:03,719 --> 00:03:07,199
is going through enough right now without this on top

55
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:10,199
of it all. I mean, look, can we just say that,

56
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:13,759
because I'm really this upset me to see, of all people,

57
00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:18,199
you've got to go after somebody who's literally fighting for

58
00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:22,479
their life. That's pretty down and low and disgusting if

59
00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:25,599
you ask me, but to quota it said, It has

60
00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:30,439
come to our attention that unsanctioned AI generated music purporting

61
00:03:30,479 --> 00:03:35,439
to contain Celine Dion's musical performances and names and likenesses

62
00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:39,520
excuse me and name and Likeness is currently circulating online

63
00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:44,280
and across various digital service providers. Please be advised that

64
00:03:44,319 --> 00:03:47,800
these recordings are fake and not approved, and are not

65
00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,639
songs from her official discography.

66
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:54,759
Speaker 2: So we should clarify this because I think I understand

67
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:57,080
you know, I only had a chance to glance at

68
00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:00,800
this before, but I so because my first thought was, well,

69
00:04:00,879 --> 00:04:04,599
how do you prove that her copyrighted work has been

70
00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:06,719
used to train these AI models? And then I realized

71
00:04:06,759 --> 00:04:09,000
that's not exactly what's happening here, right, people are creating

72
00:04:09,039 --> 00:04:11,199
AI versions and claiming it is her.

73
00:04:11,439 --> 00:04:12,639
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, yeah, this.

74
00:04:12,719 --> 00:04:15,400
Speaker 3: Is actually they're putting stuff out saying it's her, yeah,

75
00:04:15,439 --> 00:04:18,519
and it's it's not by any you know, so this

76
00:04:18,959 --> 00:04:20,600
so she just got blindsided by this.

77
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:22,399
Speaker 2: Well you know what this reminds me of. And this

78
00:04:22,519 --> 00:04:24,000
was over a year ago, I think now that we

79
00:04:24,079 --> 00:04:27,600
talked about it, somebody created on YouTube they posted an

80
00:04:27,639 --> 00:04:31,959
AI version of a brand new George Carlin album. Yes,

81
00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:35,480
remember we talked about that, and and that was interesting.

82
00:04:35,519 --> 00:04:37,519
We actually played a little bit of it. We played

83
00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:39,600
the very beginning of it on the show because I'd

84
00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:41,240
already listened to it, so I knew where the first

85
00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:43,680
swear was, so I knew how far, how far into

86
00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:45,399
it I could play because I wanted to give people

87
00:04:45,399 --> 00:04:47,800
an idea of what it sounded like and very real sound.

88
00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:49,920
It did sound very real, and not only that, I

89
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,120
ended up listening to the entire hour. It actually was

90
00:04:53,199 --> 00:04:57,079
funny too, Like it wasn't like, okay, it sounded like

91
00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,639
his voice, but the jokes were really lame. Like I

92
00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:04,240
actually laughed listening to that special Which is part of

93
00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:07,120
why some people at the time were a little bit

94
00:05:07,160 --> 00:05:11,160
skeptical and probably still are that because the people who

95
00:05:11,199 --> 00:05:14,000
created it claimed that it was entirely AI generated, but

96
00:05:14,399 --> 00:05:17,759
some people listened to it and said, hmm, yeah, the

97
00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:20,480
voice maybe, but some of those jokes, there's no way

98
00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:22,680
those were written by AI. Those were inserted by who

99
00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:24,839
ever made it, but who knows. But yeah, you can make.

100
00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:27,399
Speaker 3: Very realistic That's something that anybody can really say.

101
00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:31,800
Speaker 1: Yeah, but you can make very realistic work with it.

102
00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:33,519
Speaker 3: That's smart of what you give it. So if you

103
00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,279
fed everything to it of George Carlin, I actually don't

104
00:05:37,319 --> 00:05:39,360
doubt that it could write George Carlin jokes because it

105
00:05:39,399 --> 00:05:42,040
would have learned from that. You know, it's a computer.

106
00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:45,720
What you feed it, Yeah, right, all the bigga ones

107
00:05:45,759 --> 00:05:46,720
and zeros.

108
00:05:46,399 --> 00:05:49,800
Speaker 2: But humor is Humor is different though. That's why I'm

109
00:05:49,879 --> 00:05:51,800
also I'm one of the people who is skeptical but

110
00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:52,199
who knows.

111
00:05:52,199 --> 00:05:53,560
Speaker 1: We'll probably never know the truth.

112
00:05:53,639 --> 00:05:56,480
Speaker 3: I got you, Yeah, but I mean in April of

113
00:05:56,560 --> 00:05:59,519
last year, there were over two hundred artists that got

114
00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:04,759
together and created an Artist Writes Alliance, and they sign letters.

115
00:06:04,879 --> 00:06:08,879
And we're trying to get people to pay attention in

116
00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:12,720
saying that you know that they want they want laws

117
00:06:12,759 --> 00:06:16,199
to protect them, and they want AI developers to have

118
00:06:16,319 --> 00:06:20,399
some freaking morals, I think, and not steal from them,

119
00:06:20,399 --> 00:06:23,879
because it really is. It's stealing somebody else's are you're

120
00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:31,000
stealing theon Celene Dion's voice. That's so wrong. It's more

121
00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:33,480
wrong by because of who they chose to pick on

122
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:36,480
as somebody who's literally fighting for their If you don't know,

123
00:06:36,759 --> 00:06:40,399
Selene Dion has what's called stiff person syndrome. That's why

124
00:06:40,439 --> 00:06:43,079
she can't perform anymore. It only does so on very

125
00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:49,240
very rare occasions. It's extraordinarily painful. She suffers immense, just

126
00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:53,000
chronic every day suffering that you cannot even imagine. And

127
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,439
that's who they pick. They steal her voice, put music

128
00:06:55,439 --> 00:06:57,879
out there, claim it's her trying to make money off

129
00:06:57,920 --> 00:06:58,199
of her.

130
00:06:58,399 --> 00:07:00,240
Speaker 2: Well, also want to make a clear distinction in here

131
00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:03,639
again going back to what's really happening in this instance,

132
00:07:03,759 --> 00:07:07,199
because you know, we've had a lot of conversations about uh,

133
00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:11,319
generative AI, these large learning models. You know, they suck

134
00:07:11,399 --> 00:07:14,000
up all this information and all this art, all this

135
00:07:14,079 --> 00:07:16,360
creativity and then spit out what they spit out. And

136
00:07:16,399 --> 00:07:19,639
we've we've had conversations debating about whether that's okay or not.

137
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,480
But this is different in that this because this is

138
00:07:24,519 --> 00:07:27,519
not there's no there's no ambiguity here, because this is

139
00:07:27,639 --> 00:07:31,160
fraud if you're creating something, because you can take the

140
00:07:31,199 --> 00:07:34,399
AI completely out of it. Let's let's say it's just

141
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:37,600
somebody who does a really good impression of Selene Deon

142
00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:42,079
recording a song and then claiming that it is Selene Deon.

143
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:43,839
Speaker 1: That's out that's outright fraud.

144
00:07:43,879 --> 00:07:46,439
Speaker 2: If you create something and then and then and you

145
00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:49,519
claim it's something that it's not, that's that's fraud. That

146
00:07:49,639 --> 00:07:51,199
is there's no ambiguity there.

147
00:07:51,319 --> 00:07:54,920
Speaker 3: But the only differences in this instance, because it's AI,

148
00:07:55,199 --> 00:07:57,680
they can make it sound just like her. It's not

149
00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:01,240
just kind of like it's just like you know, because

150
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:04,680
computers can imitate everything, right, and these and what the

151
00:08:04,759 --> 00:08:07,920
Artist Rights Alliance is trying to do is protect each other.

152
00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:10,560
So when I'm talking about over two hundred, like really

153
00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:13,800
big names signed onto this, like Billie Irish and and

154
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:20,279
She's imagine dragons, Sheryl Crow, Stevie Wonder, a whole lot

155
00:08:20,279 --> 00:08:24,839
of people, and they they're from their perspective. And I

156
00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:26,839
want to give this quote because I think it's a

157
00:08:26,839 --> 00:08:31,639
great quote. They said quote, Unfortunately, some platforms and developers

158
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:37,559
are employing AI to sabotage creativity and undermined artists, songwriters,

159
00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:40,600
musicians and rights holders. And I think that that's a

160
00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:45,519
very very perfect statement. It is sabotaging their creativity. It's

161
00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:49,559
theft and fraud to steal somebody else's labors turn it

162
00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,600
into whatever you want to turn it into. You know

163
00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:56,360
that it's and you know what, Artists have enough problems

164
00:08:56,399 --> 00:08:59,559
these days making money off their own music. I mean

165
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,159
talk about that before. What they make less than what

166
00:09:03,279 --> 00:09:03,639
is it.

167
00:09:05,159 --> 00:09:10,159
Speaker 1: Whatever Spotify off right, Yeah, it's not even.

168
00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:12,360
Speaker 3: In the old days, you printed an album you made

169
00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:15,519
your money off of in part apples sales, album sales,

170
00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:18,960
and then touring. These days you're making more of your

171
00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:21,720
money off of touring because you can't make as much

172
00:09:21,759 --> 00:09:23,120
money off of album sales.

173
00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:26,480
Speaker 2: Although although what a lot of people don't realize is

174
00:09:26,519 --> 00:09:30,720
it's kind of it's it's it's uh. In terms of

175
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:33,320
trying to earn revenue from streaming, it's kind of a

176
00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:36,720
worse version of what was already the model, in the

177
00:09:36,759 --> 00:09:39,679
sense that you never really made that.

178
00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:43,240
Speaker 1: Much off of album sales. This is something people don't know.

179
00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:47,360
Speaker 2: And I've given this example before, but I remember when

180
00:09:47,360 --> 00:09:49,159
I was a kid when I first started to realize,

181
00:09:49,159 --> 00:09:51,440
because I was fascinated by all you know, all this stuff.

182
00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:53,279
When I mean AI, we didn't have yet. But when

183
00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:54,679
I was a kid, I was always very interested in

184
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,559
the music industry and how it works. And I remember

185
00:09:57,600 --> 00:09:59,519
reading an interview with meat Loaf and he was talking

186
00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:01,399
about Back Out of Hell and of course, which by

187
00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:03,679
now is probably sold and it might be it may

188
00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:07,080
have surpassed one hundred million at this point, but he

189
00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:09,440
was talking about how he didn't really make that much money,

190
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:11,879
like he said, you know, he got like a quarter

191
00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:15,519
a quarter, like twenty five cents a quarter per unit sold.

192
00:10:15,759 --> 00:10:19,080
Speaker 1: Wow, you know, And but that's that's not unusual.

193
00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 3: Although music didn't get in music how to be transferred

194
00:10:22,639 --> 00:10:24,919
from one person or another in an album. Yeah, for

195
00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:27,559
at a cassette. You couldn't just electronically, but it.

196
00:10:27,519 --> 00:10:29,879
Speaker 2: Wasn't but it wasn't as much. That's why I like

197
00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:32,519
sometimes every once in a while you'll hear very successful.

198
00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:35,000
I remember Kurt Cobain, you know, uh, of course he

199
00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:38,000
took himself away from us very young. But I remember

200
00:10:38,039 --> 00:10:40,240
when Nirvana first got really big. He made he made

201
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:42,799
a comment in an interview about you know, people think

202
00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:45,639
because we're famous, we're rich, and it's it doesn't work

203
00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,080
that way. He said, you'd be surprised how broke we are.

204
00:10:49,159 --> 00:10:51,720
And TLC we've talked about that a great example. They

205
00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:55,240
were triple platinum and broke. The money has always been

206
00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,360
in touring, the big money, and now even touring is

207
00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:01,120
is as that has become more cost prohibitive. Now the

208
00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:03,919
money really is in merch and and of course licensing.

209
00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:06,360
You know, if you license your music, say to a

210
00:11:06,519 --> 00:11:09,080
for a film or a TV series or something, then

211
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:10,759
you can make a lot of money. There's always been

212
00:11:10,759 --> 00:11:12,919
a lot of money in licensing and that persists.

213
00:11:13,399 --> 00:11:15,840
Speaker 3: But whatny do you think they make in licensing, Like

214
00:11:15,879 --> 00:11:19,679
when you're a venue having a license to be able

215
00:11:19,720 --> 00:11:22,240
to have an artist come in and play certain songs

216
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:25,480
venues can't have can only have certain music that they're

217
00:11:25,519 --> 00:11:28,159
license for. Do they get the artists make money off

218
00:11:28,159 --> 00:11:30,440
of that or are you really something that Well, yeah,

219
00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:31,519
it doesn't get them much.

220
00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:33,000
Speaker 1: It doesn't get them much.

221
00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:38,120
Speaker 2: I mean those performing rights organizations like as CAP and BMI. Yeah,

222
00:11:38,159 --> 00:11:42,000
they're supposed to make sure that you get paid. But

223
00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,399
but but for that it's it's yeah, we're not we're

224
00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:46,320
talking about yeah, Spotify money.

225
00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:48,440
Speaker 3: The bottom line, it's really hard for artists to be

226
00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:51,200
able to make money. So they have AI ripping off

227
00:11:51,279 --> 00:11:54,919
artists voices or you know, creating songs that they didn't

228
00:11:54,960 --> 00:11:58,879
even sing. Yeah, this is this is not good and

229
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:01,759
I I mean, I do believe and I do agree

230
00:12:01,759 --> 00:12:03,799
with that. I do believe that it does. They are

231
00:12:03,879 --> 00:12:07,960
correct in saying it's sabotage and creativity. It's stealing creativity.

232
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:11,320
It's stealing the life's blood of an artist. You know,

233
00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:14,279
whatever I put on a piece of canvas came out

234
00:12:14,279 --> 00:12:16,440
of my me, right.

235
00:12:16,639 --> 00:12:18,159
Speaker 1: I wouldn't you know what I mean?

236
00:12:18,519 --> 00:12:20,200
Speaker 3: You think about when I think about it that way,

237
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:24,600
it's like a musician's song is their baby, that's their soul.

238
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:27,320
You know what it actually brings up is. I know

239
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:31,240
it's slightly off, but when with Wren the artist, Wren

240
00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:33,559
the rapper Rent he used a piece of music, he

241
00:12:33,639 --> 00:12:37,559
spent like tune of dollars to buy it, and Kujo

242
00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:43,639
another rapper or something had ownership over that piece, and

243
00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:45,679
when he saw Wren made so much money, he went

244
00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:46,840
and tried to sue him for it.

245
00:12:46,919 --> 00:12:49,039
Speaker 2: Yeah, what a Yeah, we never really talked about it

246
00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:51,320
on the show, but yeah, that turned into quite a mess.

247
00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:54,039
Speaker 3: Oh but the But if you want to hear a

248
00:12:54,039 --> 00:12:56,200
really great disk track, you got to listen to Wren's

249
00:12:56,279 --> 00:12:57,440
disk track on Kuja.

250
00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:00,200
Speaker 2: But that wasn't even even an AI situation. It was

251
00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:03,120
over a sample was created.

252
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:06,879
Speaker 3: Yeah, this was trying and in in the disk track

253
00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:08,840
and what he would say and what Ren would say

254
00:13:08,879 --> 00:13:12,679
off airs. He's trying to steal my creativity. He's trying

255
00:13:12,679 --> 00:13:16,480
to steal my creat That song was so personable and

256
00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:19,240
so much of his own soul and life blood in there.

257
00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:22,600
To have somebody come along and say that's not your creativity,

258
00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:26,039
it's mine. From this two second whatever that he bought

259
00:13:26,039 --> 00:13:28,840
and paid for to use this it's just a sound bite,

260
00:13:28,879 --> 00:13:31,679
it's just a clip, not the whole song. It didn't,

261
00:13:31,879 --> 00:13:34,440
you know, it's nothing like that. It's just a particular

262
00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:38,240
looping sound. Yeah, And he bought and paid for it correctly.

263
00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:41,559
And this guy, you know, I want money, right, I

264
00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:44,200
see you making money. I want that money. Trying but

265
00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:47,120
he Wren said the same thing. You're trying to steal

266
00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:52,039
my creativity, my creation, and that it so if you

267
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:54,679
look at it in all these different situations, it's it is.

268
00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:58,440
It's stealing the very soul, lifeblood of an artist.

269
00:13:58,679 --> 00:13:59,360
Speaker 1: Yeah,

