Speaker 1: Don't talk about that bird. How you doing, man?
Speaker 2: Sorry, I'm sorry. I'm doing very well. I'm glad to
be alive. I don't know if you if you.
Speaker 1: Heard, Oh, what did you get AIDS?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 2: I haven't gotten AIDS yet though I live do live
in Miami. I totaled my car. Do you want to
know how?
Speaker 1: Please? Yeah? I mean I assume it's going back and
forth to the res.
Speaker 4: I hit.
Speaker 2: Yes, I hit an eleven foot long alligator, probably seven
hundred pounds alligator in my humble twenty twenty two HRV.
Speaker 4: And it Uh, I don't.
Speaker 2: I'm We're still not sure to this to this day
if it went under the car, or if it was
so heavy that we just hit it and it just
stayed in front of the car. And so my car
is completely totaled. But I'm happy to be alive, I say, skeptically,
how's the alligator doing? He walked away?
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. Huh they really are? They really are dinosaurs?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's I was telling a couple of people, yes,
just last night, about the same story, and all of
them were like, did you.
Speaker 4: Keep the alligator? People?
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 2: People do not have a concept of how powerful an
eleven foot long, seven hundred pounds alligator is you wouldn't
there's nothing like it on the American continent.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's quite the story. Well, at least you're okay.
You know, that's good. Glad to your better half was
with you.
Speaker 4: Yes, we're all good, you know.
Speaker 2: And that alligator really spared us because I hit it
on a curve, so I didn't know it was coming.
I hit it dead on because at that point you
just have to decide I can apply into this thing
or carreene off into the canal, and I chose to
just hit the thing. And when I did it, I've
never been in an accident where the airbags deployed before.
This is important for anybody listening who has not, so
you don't experience the same thing that I did. When
the airbags go off, it's like a black powder charge
or something that puffs them out. And so we hit
the thing and immediately there's black smoke everywhere in the
smell of fire, and I'm thinking my engine was on fire.
So me and my lady hop out of the vehicle
while the thing is still right there, like not realizing,
and I turn around and he's walking away with the
classic alligator grin on his face. It's probably four feet
away from me. His head was probably four feet away
from me walking away. So do not if you hit something,
your engine might not be on fire, So do not
jump out in case you are also confronted by a
nearly twelve foot long alligator.
Speaker 4: I was lucky to be spared.
Speaker 1: I've been that close to an alligator and it is
quite in the wild, and it is quite an experience.
It's you don't realize how quickly your heart rate can
go up fifty beats a minute.
Speaker 2: One time I had. I was hiking in the Everglades
and you're walking for a while and there's a particular noise.
If you are a hiker in Florida, you never want
to hear. It's a low, gulping noise. I'm not going
to do an impression of it here, but I've learned
how to do one. This is the sound of a
baby alligator croaking. So me and my lady are hiking
and you hear this sound. It's a gentle little croak,
but it's one of those things where I imagine, like
if you're in California and you start to feel that groundshake,
you look at one another and go, we gotta find cover.
When you hear that croak, you got to run because
it bright behind that croak is going to be an
eight foot long angry mom and you're in her house
and you got to run. They are they have to
be some of the most awe striking and terrifying animals
on Earth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they're deceptively fast. Oh yeah, yeah, all right,
I have America's number one news man on the on
the show. I don't have any music cueued up, But
what do you got for me? Bud?
Speaker 2: Well, it was a good week to be called on.
A lot happened. Uh, we can go a couple of ways. Well,
so this is so, this is the struggle that I've
been dealing with. Thank you for bringing that up. The
struggle that I've been dealing with is that now so
much is happening every day that I am suffering from.
Speaker 4: The weave.
Speaker 2: I can't hold on to anything. My zone is totally flooded.
Every single day, I wake up and the first thing
I do is I'll scroll through X, I'll check my numbers,
my follow count, and then I'll look on my timeline
and it's like Donald Trump kicks Vladimir Zlenski right in
the balls, and everybody's talking about that, and people on
their left are going, how could he do this? And
people are the right are going, why didn't he do
this sooner? And then you turn over and Christopher Rufo
is reporting that furries have taken over the NSA, And
then you turn again, and it's just a dizzying spell
of different things that are going on. Right now we
have the most relevant news. I assume this is well,
this is live right now, so I'm sure that as
people are tuning into this, you've already seen the clip,
but we might as well get to the opener. Here
is pull up the clip of Donald Trump jd Vance
meeting Vladimir Zelensky in the Oval Office.
Speaker 4: This is a.
Speaker 2: Seven or so minute long clip of their meeting. And
from what we are getting now live as we're talking,
is this ended in total disaster for Zelensky. I have
seen reports that already at least one reconstruction deal for
the energy grid in Ukraine has been pulled. Donald Trump
has pulled a deal. So Zolensky's behavior has cost Ukraine
a whole lot. And you know this is I just
want people one thing I wants to point out because
I think Number one, it's true. Number two, I think
it's an important narrative. Jd Vance here is playing the
tough guy. So it is what it is. It's very
obvious that's what's happening. If you watch Donald Trump, He's
directing the conversation with his eyes. It's a classic business meeting.
I really want people to pay attention here to the
compassion that Donald Trump has because this is something that
I've never seen in a previous administration, the compassion that
Donald Trump displays with the tough love attitude. The current
narrative is these guys heye Zelensky. I don't think it's
a good narrative. I also don't think it's true. I
think Donald Trump is It's clear from this this treatment
that we got. I've never seen anything like this kind
of a debate in public. Donald Trump not only wants
to end the war, but he is not moved by
Zolensky or who Zolensky represents, and that is something that
needs to be paid attention to. This is a guy
who's compassionate to end a war, and it is not
clear to me that he gives any concern about the
fact that Zelensky is basically an intelligence agent for Zionists.
So let's it doesn't back down. JD is there pummeling him.
He rudely interrupts JD about three words into the answer
JD is giving to Zelensky's question. I really think this
will be the UH interview that is played back over
and over again for years to come as the turn
of Zolensky being a hero to Zolensky being a villain
is completed as part of this deal that's being worked
out with Russia to replace him. If you remember, Zelenski
already set this up when he said I'm willing to
step down for peace, so he already knows what's coming.
Watch either they're going to kill the guy or they're
going to replace him with somebody who can get the
deal done. Here, you might as well play it now.
Speaker 1: Well, I'll make people upset and hold it out a
little bit longer. What do you say to people that
this was all stage Now. I could see that you
have Vance there for a certain reason, because maybe Vance
is going to and maybe they're playing good cop, bad cop. Okay,
But the people who are going to say, you know
this is scripted there. Zelensky's an actor and he's reading
from a script, and so is Donald Trump, and JD events.
Speaker 2: I think it's like you, actually you had tweeted this.
I'll ape your line here. I think it's retarded. I
think it's people who live in total fairyland. Nothing about this,
nothing about what happened here, needed to be scripted. And
now I think we can get extend a benefit of
the doubt, maybe to the people who go, this was scripted.
And I'll tell you why, because Zelenski. Everything that Zelensky
said is the same line that I have heard every
talking head pro Ukraine talking head US over and over.
It was the exact same conversation we've always heard, which goes,
here's the problem, here's my version of the history, So
what do you say about Russia. JD doesn't even get
three words into answering that question, and Zelensky goes, have
you ever even been to Ukraine? Which is always the
second question, always the second question, and of course he
already knows the answer to it. JD's never been there.
So JD pivots again and it turns into this mess.
But both of them immediately realized what Zelensky was doing.
So when people go this is scripted, the only benefit
of the doubt I can extend to that is that
it's because you've heard Zolensky make the same points over
and over again, but we have not heard JD make
the points that he made. I mean, the conscription vans
is something that the entire previous administration ignored, didn't talk about.
This is this is to call something like this scripted,
it becomes meaningless when there are new ideas being introduced
into this. Now there are deals that are being canceled
because of it. So you know, when people say scripted,
they either mean they already knew what the outcome of
this was going to be, in which case it's an
asinine points to make prove it, or they mean it
was scripted in the sense that they already.
Speaker 4: Know the outcome.
Speaker 2: And I think something that indicates that is JD's been
tweeting for quite a while Russia's superior position in this war,
and a lot of the kickback that JD was getting
from Hanania and others totally perplexing kickback was is this
really a wise way to be speaking in the middle
of a negotiation to which the obvious answer is everybody
at the negotiating table already knows the state of war.
And that was what JD basically responded directly to Hanania.
He said, yes, I'm sure it was my tweet that
made everybody realize what Russia's position was. So that in
combination with the arrogance of Zelensky, which is pointed out
by Trump, what cards does Zelenski actually hold here?
Speaker 4: How dare he argue?
Speaker 2: So all of this gets developed, and you know, the
person who's calling it scripted. This is the same kind
of reaction that I also saw yesterday where libertarians were
taking the victory lap about the fact that Pam Bondi
and Cash Pattel are just as corrupt as every other
prior person in their position, as if it has anything
to do with it. It's just like victory lapping for
hollow points. So I don't really have any time for it.
To call it scripted sort of defeats the purpose of
what scripted means. The last administration was scripted that is
nothing like this one. So that's what I would say
fully to answer the question about what people who call
it scripted mean to me.
Speaker 1: All right, let's play this and let's see if it plays.
I might have to share it from another source. Yep.
I saw that that it wasn't going to So then
I have at the ready another source. What a pro Yeah,
you know, I'm good like that. All right, here we go.
Speaker 5: This thing. All would you see the hatred he's got
for at that.
Speaker 6: It's very tough for me to make a deal with
that kind of Hey, he's got tremendous hatred and I
understand that. But I can tell you the other side
is exactly in love with you know himy there. So
it's not a question of alignment. I have to I'm
aligned with the world. I want to get the things set.
I'm aligned with Europe. I want to see if we
can get this thing done. You want me to be tough.
I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen.
I'd be so tough. But you're never going to get
a deal that way.
Speaker 1: So there's one of the ultimate trump isms right there.
Speaker 4: Yes, yeah, well there's a few in this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's beautiful. It's beautiful.
Speaker 7: One more question, Hey, I would respond to this.
Speaker 3: So look, for four years in the United States of America,
we had a president who stood up at press conferences
and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded
Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The
path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe
engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden,
of thumping our chest and pretending that the President of
the United States's words mattered more than the President of
the United States's actions. What makes America a good country
is America engaging in diplomacy.
Speaker 7: That's what President Trump is doing. Can I ask you sure?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 7: Yeah, okay.
Speaker 8: So he occupied it our parts, big parts of Ukraine,
parts of East and Crimea.
Speaker 7: So he occupied it on twenty fifteen.
Speaker 8: So during a lot of years, I'm not speaking about
Jis Biden, but those time was Obama, then President Obama,
then President Trump, than President Biden. Now the President Trump
and God blessed. Now President Trump will stop him. But
during twenty fifteen, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and
took He killed people. You know what the content twenty.
Speaker 5: Fifteen, twenty.
Speaker 8: Fourteen, So he killed that here yeah by the second, yes,
But during twenty fourteen till twenty twenty two, you know
what the situation the same that people have been dying
on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that
we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my
bilateral conversation, and we signed with him, me like a
new president. In twenty nineteen. I signed with him the
deal I signed with him. Macron and meyr Kill we
signed ceasefire, ceasefire.
Speaker 7: All of them told me that he will never go.
Speaker 8: We signed him with guest contract, guess contract, yes, but
after that he broken this cease fire. He killed our
people and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange
of prisoners, but he didn't do it.
Speaker 4: Just pause it for a second here.
Speaker 2: So and now question you may know better answer to
than me, is we understand with JD's visit to Europe
that the emphasis on who is going to be taking
care of Ukraine and who is going to be heading
NATO is shifting in responsibility to the Europeans. It's clear
also here that Zelensky is expressing he has no belief
that the Europeans will back him because they didn't previously
back him. My question, I guess, Pete, maybe you know
more about this in me is Is he right about that?
Does you Does Europe really have any interest in defending
Ukraine so long as the United States isn't paying for it?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. They don't have the money to
do it. I mean London is out of gold. I
mean they don't. They don't even have backing for what
they're lending out now. So who has a Germany? Who's
who's going to do this? I mean this is all
like if you go on certain websites, you can see
they're posting all of the quotes that are coming out
of Germany stands with Ukraine. All that okay, you can
say that all you want that all that is is
hopes and prayers, your thoughts and prayers. I mean, they
don't have the money to do this, They don't have
the will to do this. The only one that may
have the will to even try it is England because
they need those minerals, because they don't they have no
Their wealth is gone, the wealth is gone from the
City of London, so they need something to back up
what they do as far as banking goes, That's the
only one I can think of. But I think it's bullshit.
I don't I don't think Europe is going to stand
for this at all. I mean you could say, oh, well,
if he takes Ukraine, then he'll take the rest of Europe. Really,
I mean you're the same people who say, and he's
not even beating Ukraine right now, and you think he's
taking the rest of Europe? Okay, what do you They
know they're lying? So I don't take this seriously at all.
Speaker 2: Is it is it that they know they're lying or
is it that they know they can't back up their
own sovereignty?
Speaker 1: Well, I think some of them know they're lying. I
think there are AA had a played a an audio
from I can't remember who it was. I think it
was something EU related where they actually sounded like they thought, oh,
they know we can still win this if we you know,
Ukraine can still win this if they do this.
Speaker 2: What King Stormer was saying or was that what Boris
whatever his name is was saying has been saying for
a long time.
Speaker 1: Both. But when you say back up their own sovereignty,
what do you mean?
Speaker 4: Well, I don't know. I guess that before I answered that.
Speaker 2: The next question is Europe really interested in whether or
not parts of Ukraine are owned by Russia. But I
guess are they really interested? You said they couldn't they
couldn't back it up because they don't have the money.
But do they even have an ideological cause?
Speaker 1: I don't know why they would, considering Russia has held
parts of Ukraine before. Yeah, it's it's only it seems
like it's only since Putin took power that they have
they care about Ukraine. I mean, when Ukraine was totally
controlled by the Soviet Union, well, we don't speak bad
poorly of the Soviet Union, you know, so yeah, So.
Speaker 2: I guess then to answer that is right now, I
guess there's a perception that Ukraine has sovereignty and right
now a lot of the EU representatives are. I mean,
this is their main thing is preserving Ukrainian sovereignty. And
the big line is I forget again who it was
that said it, but they were basically going, we will
back you Ukraine, if you want to keep going to war,
we will back you. And doing that I think with Stormer,
and the reality of that is that he's not telling
the truth, they will not back him. If the the
United States lessens its relationship with Ukraine and stops paying
for the war, effort.
Speaker 4: They're just lying.
Speaker 2: They will not back Ukraine at all, and therefore they
accept the territories that will be taken by Putin. And
then I guess I wonder if he was to move
in and wrap up on the rest of Ukraine, they
probably would not move to stop that or even care either.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, that might be a different story, but
I don't think he wants the rest of Ukraine. I mean,
Ukraine has two countries when you break it down. In
the East you have Russians, they're ethnic Russians. In the
west you have retarded Ukrainians. You have pale of settlement Ukrainians.
You have galician Ukrainians. They're historically psychotic, retarded. You can't
you can't control them. They you don't. He doesn't want them.
Why would he want to control the people who? Why
would he? Why would he want control of land that
contains a people that is deranged?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, he already has Chechnya, that's true, doesn't need.
Speaker 4: To he already has Dagastan.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Chechnya seems to be on his side because of
some maybe some eschatological beliefs that they have. But they'll uh,
that's for that's for a totally different episode.
Speaker 4: So yeah, just to bring it back to what we're
watching here.
Speaker 2: All of that to say, uh, Zo Lenski knows that
if the United States doesn't care, nobody cares. So it's
perplexing the position that he takes here where he's acting
as though he's got other people in his corner.
Speaker 1: No, it's he's he's if he honestly believes this, he
if he thinks he's going to go into our White
House and bully you know Trump, who's been dealing with
bullies his whole life and has had to learn how
to be a bully. Well, I mean the man letters retarded.
Speaker 2: Didn't and he didn't bring a translator, which I think
is perplexing because he's a horrible English speaker and he
doesn't understand English idioms and I just don't understand that.
Don't get it at all. Other than that it's sheer,
total arrogance.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we'll keep going with this.
Speaker 2: I do I want people to pay attention to the
number of words after he finishes this long, annoying spiel
we've heard before, how many words jd Vance gets into
his response before Zelenski interrupts him, and how immediately the
tenor of the conversation changes.
Speaker 7: Us became involved. What what do you what do you mean?
Speaker 3: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to
end the destruction of your country.
Speaker 7: Acts, but press with respect.
Speaker 3: I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the
Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of
the American media. Right now, you guys are going around
and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you.
Speaker 7: Have manpower problems.
Speaker 3: You should be thanking the president for trying to bring
it into this company.
Speaker 7: Look into Ukraine that you say, what problems we have?
I have been to come.
Speaker 3: I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories,
and I know what happens is you bring people, you
bring them on a propaganda tour.
Speaker 7: Mister president, are do you disagree that you've had.
Speaker 2: Where has any of this been said by a previous
administration or anyone working in the previous administration.
Speaker 1: If you notice back there, when after Zelenski said his
last sentence, he whispers something under his breath and some
people s yeah, some people are picking up that it
was a Ukrainian word for bitch.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I would not be surprised.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I tagged a friend of ours who has a
Ukrainian wife to see if he can verify that. All right, ready,
I rolled it back just a bit.
Speaker 4: Yep, go for it.
Speaker 7: And to bring it into this conflict into Ukraine that
you say, what problems we have?
Speaker 3: I have been to I've actually I've actually watched and
seen the stories, and I know what happens is you
bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour. Mister president,
are do you disagree that you've had problems bringing people
in your military have?
Speaker 7: And do you think that it's respectful once to come
to the.
Speaker 3: Oval Office of the United States of America and attack
the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the
destruction of your country.
Speaker 7: A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning.
Speaker 8: Sure, First of all, during the war, everybody has problems,
even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now,
but you will feel it in diffusion.
Speaker 7: Bless bless you.
Speaker 6: I'm blessed you're not war. Don't tell us what we're
going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't
tell us what we're going to feel. I'm not telling
you because you're in no position.
Speaker 5: To dictate that.
Speaker 2: Pause here just uh just again to if you've watched
any any Ukrainian uh naphotaards do this this kind of thing.
It always goes history, uh and their version of history,
and then it goes you've never been here, so what
do you know? And then it always goes if you
don't do what we say, you're gonna feel it eventually.
It's always the same lines.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's pure propaganda. It's it's it's it's basically Haspora
Israeli hospera, where it's like, oh, well, look at what
we're dealing with over here. If you if we don't
deal with these terrorists, you're gonna eventually deal with them. Well, yeah,
we're going to deal with them. If you're if hyas is,
if the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society is sending them into
Europe and the United States, sure, yeah yeah.
Speaker 2: Total emotional blackmail that just does doesn't work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And it's just it's all threats, you know. It's
like that barbeler and respector thing. If the United if
Europe doesn't learn to become multicultural, it's not going to
it's not going to survive. Is that a threat? Bitch?
What are you doing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it comes from a perspective where the person saying
it is under the impression that they're in agreement. Like
this kind of thing used to work in the Biden administration.
It doesn't work now. This is a guy who has
a cordial relationship with with Vladimir Putin. This is not
You're not talking to people who have this grand mythos
about the evil USSR that still exists anymore.
Speaker 1: Or Czarist Russia, or more accurately, a lot of them
might get to that stuff. A lot of them like
the Soviet Union. They didn't like Czarist Russia.
Speaker 4: The early Soviet Union, the very early one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, before nineteen fifty four.
Speaker 5: Yes, yeah, what we're gonna feel, We're gonna feel very good.
Speaker 6: Feel We're gonna feel very good and very strong influence.
You're right now, not in a very good position. You've
allowed you to be in a very bad position that
he's apple to be.
Speaker 7: Right about the very beginning of the war.
Speaker 5: Not in a good position. You don't have the cards
right now with us. You start having right.
Speaker 7: Now, you don't you playing players.
Speaker 9: You're gambling with their lives and millions of people see
you're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World
War three, and what you're doing.
Speaker 6: Is very disrespectful to the country, this country. That's back
to you far more than a lot of people said
they should have have.
Speaker 5: You said thank you once that.
Speaker 3: You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October.
Speaker 1: Offers that something people don't that. That's something that JD's
said that I had completely forgotten about. So we came
to the United States and campaigned for the Biden for
the reelection of not Biden, but it was Kamala Harris
at the time. Yeah, he did that.
Speaker 4: I totally forgot about it too.
Speaker 2: But it's evident that the people that they didn't forget
about it. And that's that's what's good about it.
Speaker 1: Oh, you gotta love somebody like Trump who never forgets
somebody who slights him.
Speaker 4: Go back a little bit.
Speaker 2: And I watched Trump's face because I think after JD
says that Trump does that like he's right, you know,
like that like realization.
Speaker 1: All right, let's do that with.
Speaker 9: Millions of people. See, you're gambling with World War three.
Speaker 6: You're gambling with World War three, and what you're doing
is very disrespectful to the country, this country. That's far
more than a lot of people said they should have have.
Speaker 7: You said thank you once in this entire media.
Speaker 3: You said thank you to You went to Pennsylvania and
campaigned for the opposition in October.
Speaker 7: Offer some words of appreciation for.
Speaker 3: The United States of America and the president who's treating
this tree your country.
Speaker 7: Please.
Speaker 8: You're saying that if you will speak very loudly about
the war.
Speaker 5: He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly.
Speaker 6: Your country is in big trouble. No, No, you've done
a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
I know you're not winning. You're not winning this.
Speaker 5: You have a.
Speaker 6: Damn good chance of coming out, Okay, because of some president.
Speaker 8: We are staying you know what, country staying strong. From
the very beginning of the war, we've been alone and
we are thankful. I said thanks.
Speaker 5: He gave you, stupid president three hundred and fifty.
Speaker 2: We have been alone? Is crazy, some disrespectful.
Speaker 1: How much support has he gotten from it? There's no
way could have made it past.
Speaker 2: Yeah, beyond material, there's an extensive foreign legion. Yeah, I
mean this guy is a hero, piece of ship.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there are retards from this country who went over
there to to fight with this, to fight for ZOG.
Speaker 4: I think you mean heroes.
Speaker 2: What I think you mean heroes like Ryan Routh and
Malcolm Nance.
Speaker 1: Don't get me started. Don't do that. Don't do that.
Bird all right, I rolled it back a little bit.
Let's play that again.
Speaker 6: He gave you, stupid president, three hundred and fifty billion dollars.
Speaker 7: He gave your military.
Speaker 10: Equipment, and you met a brave but they had to
use our military one of these. If you didn't have
our military equipment, if you didn't have our military equipment,
this war would have been over in two weeks.
Speaker 8: In three days, I heard it from Putting in three days.
Speaker 1: You know, folks, this is another this is another NAPO thing. Oh,
this is all putin talking points.
Speaker 4: Yes, oh it is.
Speaker 2: You just want to punch him right in the head.
I'm sure he just wanted to punch it right in
the head. You know. It's unbelievable levels of disrespect from
a guy with no negotiating position. I'm telling you this
will go down as this will when every documentary about
this conflict comes out.
Speaker 4: This will be a scene, a major scene.
Speaker 7: This is how maybe.
Speaker 8: Less in two weeks of course, yes, it's going to
be a very hard.
Speaker 5: Thing to do business like this.
Speaker 7: Tell you say thank you.
Speaker 5: I said it.
Speaker 3: Except for American they except that they are a disagree events,
and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to
fight it out of the American media when you're wrong.
Speaker 7: We know that you're wrong.
Speaker 6: But you see, I think it's good for the American
people to see what's going on.
Speaker 2: That's revelation right there, what he says, they're there. I
think it's great that everybody can see what is going on.
That that is the stake through the heart. If you'll
mind the heavy handed reference.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, let me uh, let me keep going here.
Speaker 6: You have to be thankful you don't have the cars.
You're buried there, your people that die. Tell you you're
running low on soldiers. Listen, you're running slow on soldiers.
It would be a damn goodness. And then then you tell.
Speaker 5: Us I don't want to cease fire. I don't want
to cease fire. I want to go and I wanted this.
Speaker 6: Look if you could get a ceasefire right now and
tell you take it, so the bullet stopped flying and
your ment stuff.
Speaker 7: Courting kills those we want to stop the war.
Speaker 5: But I'm saying you don't want to see you.
Speaker 6: I want to see because you get a ceasefire faster
than any.
Speaker 7: Gree colored people of all fire. What they see.
Speaker 5: That wasn't me, That wasn't with me.
Speaker 6: That was with a guy named Biden, who was not
a smart person.
Speaker 5: That was that was excuse me.
Speaker 6: That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I
gave you javelins.
Speaker 5: I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks.
Obama gave you sheets.
Speaker 9: In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump
gave javelins.
Speaker 6: You gotta be more thankful, because let me tell you,
you don't have the cards.
Speaker 5: With us, you have the cards, but without us, you
don't have any cards. It's gonna be a tough.
Speaker 6: Deal to make because the attitudes have to change.
Speaker 5: This thing over.
Speaker 1: I mean, there was there was a there was a
part right there where he was like, you know, he
sounded like Janeiro and good Fellas. No, no, no, no,
You're being very disrespectful, very disrespectful.
Speaker 2: This is its top form. I'm in awe. I'm totally
in awe. And again and again I just want to
point out the compassion. He could have kicked him out
right away. That's what I would have done. I would
have kicked him out right away. He let him go on,
and he ended up making an ass of himself and
even greater ask himself. He doesn't even have to.
Speaker 4: Be in the room.
Speaker 2: Him and Putin could make the deal he would have.
He doesn't have to be in the room.
Speaker 1: Let me present this. Let me present this, because I
thought this was something that was pretty insane. While this
is all going on, the Ukrainian ambassador to the United
States is in the room and somebody got her reaction.
Speaker 2: Oh no, yeah, you should have put him up there
with a translator or something.
Speaker 4: I mean, Jeffrey Sacks next to her. Who's that next
to her?
Speaker 1: Oh? Let me see.
Speaker 4: It looks like Jeffrey Sachs.
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Sachs would have been like, look, you have to
you have to do a little better here. You have
to act a little you have to act more. No,
that's not Jeffrey Sacks.
Speaker 2: It looks like a little funny stack the front row
with all of the war like his worst critics.
Speaker 1: Oh, oh man, that would be brutal. That's like up there.
It's like putin bringing the dog in with Merkle was there,
knowing that Merkle is scared of dogs.
Speaker 4: It was a glorious day.
Speaker 2: I mean, this was the death of NAPO, if I mean,
that's the best way to put it, is that there
the North American fellas are now going to be labeled
international criminals and they're all going to be put in jail.
Speaker 1: That's been my hope all along. I was hope. My
hope was that it was all a paid op, because
then their names would be somewhere.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I used to tell them that. I used to tell
them that online all the time. I'd be going back
and forth and on Twitter. I'm like, you better hope
you're there isn't a list somewhere, and if there is,
you better hope someone burns it, because this is this
is going to come back on you guys. You guys
have been freaking promoting basically what was turned out to
be a genocide. Yeah, good luck with that, guys. And
they're so do you to have many of them like, oh,
I'm getting your account, your account's going to be deleted.
I'm getting your account's going to be destroyed. Five minutes
five minutes and then like five minutes they block me.
I mean children, children, but children who are promoting this.
I mean, I don't it's hard to know numbers. But
people that I respect you are saying like over a
million Ukrainians.
Speaker 4: And yes, I've seen I've seen the million number.
Speaker 1: Also, yeah, I remember Scott Ritter saying sometime in the
middle of last year that there were reports that there
were a lot more dead and they were being buried
in unmarked graves and their commanding officers were just collecting
their paychecks.
Speaker 2: You know, yeah, I wouldn't doubt it. I mean from
that performance. By that, I mean the propagandistic nature of
the performance. From that performance, it's clear at this point
you simply can't believe anything associated with this guy, no
information coming from anything he's associated with.
Speaker 4: If you didn't already realize that.
Speaker 1: Did you hear Tucker on that episode, He released a
couple of weeks ago where he said he was in
a town in Switzerland that one of the richest towns
in Europe, and it was all Ukrainians shopping at the
jewelry stores and just you know, spreading wealth all over
the place.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, I I was shocked to find out
the level of I'm tilting my head like I'm on
the office when I say this at the camera, the
level of Ukrainian American wealth and influence in this country.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a.
Speaker 4: I'm staring at you intensely.
Speaker 1: So on the Old Glory Club livestream last night, we
came up with I think we've come up with another euphemism, Galicians,
because his men just kept talking about all the psychopaths
that come out of Galicia.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and Galician American influences.
Speaker 4: Stunning.
Speaker 1: I made the point that both of my my grandmother's
through my mom's sides parents came here from Galice. Wow,
they're a year apart from each other, and nineteen ten
and nineteen eleven, And I always I wondered growing up
why my grandmother was such a raging ANSI semi.
Speaker 2: Well, I also, I think that makes you Galician by maternity.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean they're you know, it's just they're just
ethnic polls.
Speaker 2: So the Galician network, Yeah, this is a stunning thing.
This will be remembered forever as probably one of the
worst diplomatic blunders that stupid country ever could have had.
Speaker 1: So, yeah, is that all all over Ukraine. And really,
you know, as I've been saying, you know for a
couple of years now, all this is, you know, and
doctor Matthew Raphael Johnson puts it perfect. He said, all
this is is something that a bunch of people in
our government who shouldn't be in our government, who have
an ethnic animosity because of a pogram that happened in
sixteen fifty two. And you know, a bunch of these
people can train it can trace their families to like
within a ten mile radius of Lovov. They hate Russia,
they hate Ukrainians, and they manage to figure out a
way to get Russians and Ukrainians killing each other. And
I will say Russian and Ukrainian Christians killing each other, right,
And people say, well, well, well Putin didn't have to invade. Yeah,
put yourself in the position that he was in. And see,
you can say that from your fucking and I'll be
I'll be really boomer here from your parents' basement. You
can fucking say that, but be the fucking leader of
you know, a country that has ten thousand nukes and
you know has you know, and it basically has a
group of their ethnic cohorts in another country just south
of them, who are being murdered and targeted for almost
you know, eight years at that point, and see if
you finally aren't like, okay, this is the final straw,
we have to do something. Maybe it was a bad decision,
you know, maybe it was and it turns into a
fucking catastrophe. But I mean sometimes you just have to
make a decision that's really fucking hard.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, again, I got to give great credit
to the administration for its compassion. I would have first day,
I would have saw him out the door. I would
have give give him putin what he wants. Ended it
bucked them, Fuck the last administration.
Speaker 4: Just end it.
Speaker 1: Walk them out the door, walk them out the door
on your own, and have your hand on his back
and do like one of those old moves where you
slam his head against the door jam as he's going through.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would have given a Russia, all the Oblasts.
I would have given him crimea that I still would
have taken fifty percent of Ukraine's minerals to pass back,
and I would have saw him out the door. This
is a deeply compassionate regime.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean they tried, Yeah, but one thing
I was recording with my buddy Dark Enlightenment before this,
and one of the things I pointed out to him
is that for all the talk of Trump being this
this incredible zionist, basically by turning his back on Ukraine,
he's turned his back on international jewelry. Because I mean,
that's the response, that's who this whole thing is for.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I can go that far with
you because of the other subject matter we might talk about,
but it's certainly is the case that this project of
theirs is now.
Speaker 4: Being put to an end.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, So do.
Speaker 2: You want to get into the other related topic, Yeah.
Speaker 1: You know, they're I'm glad I gave this twenty four
hours before I really started talking about it because talking
to other people, they've made me see it in different ways.
But you can go ahead. You're America's you're America's number
one news man, and everyone's always interested in what you
have to say about something.
Speaker 2: Well, the other most important piece of news, and I
agree with you that there is there's a lot of
ways to look at this, but the other most important
piece of news this week regards for vek Ramaswami's feet
no that's not not true. That's a lot.
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, but come on, when you saw that,
you had to have and the people who were going, well,
you know, or a whole the whole Asian culture takes
their clothes, It takes their feet off when they're going
to Yeah, they either wear slippers or socks. They don't
go around.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: It's and can I just say and even in the listen,
I'm trying to be compassionate myself. I was so moved
today by Donald Trump's behavior that I'm trying to be
compassionate myself. Maybe it is like a Southeast Asian thing
to just straight up go barefoot during interviews, but I
will lay some of the blame at the people framing
the image to show his feet, because we don't need to.
I could have gone the watching the whole interview without
thinking about his feet, but they wanted us to see his.
Speaker 1: Feet, and I mean, I'm glad they did.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, it's true.
Speaker 2: They're they're trying to keep this guy out of Ohio.
Everybody is in agreement. This guy cannot go any further.
But he just has too much money to be kind
of stopped.
Speaker 1: That's the problem. That's what I said last night, ze
Man said, if it wasn't for the money, this guy
would not make it past the primaries. But he's so
much money behind him, it's going to be really hard
to defeat him.
Speaker 2: Well, then, I just want you to know, in case
you're curious, on Wiki feet, his feet have been rated
two point seven to one. Now, who is backing this guy?
Speaker 1: The narrator he didn't want to know that.
Speaker 4: I'll spare you.
Speaker 2: I'll spare you the comparative numbers of others to give
you an idea.
Speaker 4: I'll spare you of that. Who is backing this guy?
Speaker 2: Is this guy entirely backed by wealthy Indians or is
there some secret third option of who's backing him?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean his his initial company, the company that
he had the what was that called rug Pull Incorporated?
I think so they were backed by JD. Vance money
and Peter Thiel money. Well, which is basically the same
thing at that point. So, I mean you can just
go off of that, but it.
Speaker 2: Is a fake. Now you know, I've got I've got
issues with both of the two that you just named,
but not not seemingly in the same way ideologically as
why Vivek bothers me. I mean, do you feel the
same way or do you just kind of view them
all as they're being the same issue.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, someone asked me, someone asked me recently.
They said, well, if you had to have an next
door neighbor who was Indian or somewhat of a certain
tribe that you have you talk about often, who would
it be? And without even hesitation, I'm like, oh, the
tribe member?
Speaker 4: I completely agree.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't really. I've there's an Indian community in
Atlanta that I used to dry by all the time
is basically one of those apartment complexes and they basically
took over the whole thing. Yeah, I mean you could
smell it a mile away.
Speaker 2: There you go. You're you are through that. You are
you are handing on exactly. The issue that I have
is that, uh, Peter Tele doesn't want me to be
Peter Tele and the vek Ramaswami doesn't want me to
have a house.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I mean he doesn't want you to have
a job. He wants he wants, like you know, Infinity
pajets to come over here and you know do what
take Yeah, take over your house and you know so
that you they become owners, you become a renter and
mostly will.
Speaker 4: Never take over my job. They'll never want my job.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they'll they can never be the number one news man.
No one have you noticed that there? I mean, are
there any prominent Indian news people on TV even in
the mainstream meeting?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 4: Great question?
Speaker 1: No, because I don't think so trustworthy.
Speaker 4: What about yeah?
Speaker 2: No, no, what about that one podcast co host to
crystal Ball, Fogger and Jetty?
Speaker 4: Is that guy Indian?
Speaker 1: I don't like him? I don't know.
Speaker 4: Is that.
Speaker 10: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I just got in.
Speaker 2: I was just qualified as American recently, so I got
in before they closed the boarder.
Speaker 4: Really, now, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. I think you're right there. I
don't think there is. I don't think there is.
Speaker 1: So what's the other subject that you will.
Speaker 4: The real subject? Well, I guess there's two.
Speaker 2: I don't know how interested you are in the man
s A FBI C I A text chat.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, let's talk about that, because
I mean.
Speaker 3: That is.
Speaker 2: I'll still have another subject after that if you want
to do that, which is due to the release of
some files.
Speaker 4: But you we can do this first.
Speaker 2: Yeah, bet well, No, you definitely know more about this
than me. This is one of those things that skews
me out too much to where I couldn't really research it.
Speaker 4: I cadn't really look it up.
Speaker 2: All I know is RUFO leaked NSA and ci A,
and I believe the FBI is in on this chat.
It's called intel Link or intel.
Speaker 1: Anyone, anyone in the Intel community. It's available to tell Slack.
Speaker 2: It's some kind of private Slack channel where they talk
about it's just I mean, there was so there's this
whole chat network and there was a private chat room
that was that was about transgender sex, genital castration, artificial vaginas, piss, fetishes, polycules,
gang bangs, other explicit material, uh furreedom. And you read
some of this stuff and it strikes you as incredibly sexless.
And so as I was reading this, I was suffering
from a kind of uncanny valley, this feeling of these
I mean, total scum. Every single person here is an
intelligence agent and is like a gross troon, and that
combination together terrifies me. And so I'm reading this completely
sexless blog and I think RUFO did everybody a little
bit of a favor here because if you go to
Rufo's original post where he talked about this on February
twenty fourth, it begins exclusive at Grossman Hannah and I
obtained logs from the nssa's secret transgender sex chat room
in which NSA, CIA and DIA FBI employees discussed all
the things that I named. That's the tweet. You go
through the thread and there's a lot of highlights Rufo
made where that highlighted the prominence of a certain organization,
if you will, and its representation within the intelligence community,
especially in the transgender chat rooms.
Speaker 4: Do without what you will? What do you think about
all of this? Pete?
Speaker 1: Which one are you talking about?
Speaker 2: There was a group two to four thousand years ago,
and what if I give you my forty minute putin
explanation of how we got from Moses to the transgender.
Speaker 1: So it would be a it would be a fucking
straight line. It would there's no branches on that tree. Obviously.
Obviously the most disturbing part of that was, you know,
even if you want to take the whole libertarian live
and let live kind of bullshit that I don't buy
into anymore. They were talking about how to groom children. Yes,
that that was probably one of the main subjects that
they talked about is how do we get children into this?
And you know, that's the problem. That that's it right there,
and it is it's you know what oron McIntyre you know,
oron McIntyre tapping the sign. It's not rocket science. They're
evil and they want to diddle kids. That that's it.
That's it. That's that's the takeaway. The takeaway is it
was shown that some of them are powerful people in
this country. People that can pick your name randomly and
target you and put you in jail or send officers
to kill you and nothing will happen to them. Are
deviant child grooming monsters and you know, basically.
Speaker 4: And they can read all your text messages.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they have access to everything you do. And they're
they're they're basically eunuchs. And I thought Aaron McIntyre when
he was talking to Jay Burden the other day made
you know, pointed something out that basically, if we look
back in history at the end of empire, eunuchs always
end up having a political influence.
Speaker 2: Yes, China, Rome and in Greece. You're right, that's it's
a very wise observation. These are these are the UNUS.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so huh do with that information what you will? People.
Speaker 2: I guess they are investigating this deeper. I know Tulsi
gabbartt I think is taking the helm on this one.
So we'll see what comes out of it beyond just this.
Something tells me that whatever information we're given won't actually
distinctly threaten the intelligence apparatus, which that same notion will
tie us into what we can talk about after this.
Speaker 4: But before we end on this.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I want to say about Tulsi is you
know it came out a couple of years ago that
Tulsi was She wasn't on the no fly list, but
she was on a watch list or when she traveled.
These are the people who decide who goes on those lists.
These are the people, if they don't make the ultimate decision,
They're the ones who gather the intel quote unquote to
pass it up the line. And what do you think
up the line looks like you think up the line?
Is any different? I'm interested in. What I'm interested in
seeing is I want to know the positions of some
of these people. I want to know like where they
where they are in the in the NSA where they
are in department home. I want I want to know
who in this who was the highest ranking of the
highest ranking I guess position, who had the highest ranking
title in this group?
Speaker 2: Well, you know I and I actually think i'd like
to see something like the reverse of that. I'm really
interested to see how many people participating in this chat
room were low level. You know, I guess you'd say
they have a light executive function and that they're not
in management. They are the individual contributors. I'm really interested
to see if it's actually from the bottom, which is
where a lot of the direct impact on individuals. The
black is siphoned, and so yes, I'd like to see
institutionally on top of what orders are being given and
who's involved. But I really want to see how many
regular agents, how many people in the I don't know
their finance department or their HR department or things like that.
These these functions that you know in the government have
very very weak oversight. That's the stuff that I'm I'm
really interested in here, and I hope Tulsi pulls that
information out. And I also think we are more likely
to get that kind of information because it won't structurally
threaten the intelligence agency. So we'll see. I guess we'll see.
But so my question to you, Pete is before we
cycle off of this, what do you say to the
people who who caution us that this information in the
manner that it was revealed by Hannah Grossman's reporting. What
do you think about the claims of the invasion of
privacy in relation to these workers and their their chat rooms.
There was a couple of perplexing tweets going around about
you know, are you comfortable with the ability for these
investigators to just be able to kind of publicly shame you.
Speaker 4: What do you think about that?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, if they're working for the government, if
they're being paid by the American people, I don't think
that they and they're on they're using a server that
is being paid for by the American people, they don't
have an expectation of privacy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And I think.
Speaker 2: You know, the obvious point here is it's just entirely
it ignores the you know, the political stakes. We there
was a mandate issue to Donald Trump in this administration
to do this kind of stuff. I don't so care
about free expression of government employees or really anybody else.
I mean, the goal is clear out as much of
the administrative state as possible and replace you know, fewer
positions altogether, so there's more management, replace them with people
who are you know, it's a it's a purge. We're
replacing these people with people who are going to work
for us. And I think at this stage we just,
you know, we need to stop moralizing about it and
even engaging in the moralization of it and acknowledge this
is politics.
Speaker 4: Grow up.
Speaker 2: We're doing what we were given a mandate to do,
and we're going to change the country forever. So it
was really unusual to see people ostensibly who are on
our side issuing this kind of like concern and I
think he needs to take a closer look at people
issue concerns like that about really what their priorities are.
Do they want to win or do they want to
feel like the h because I want to win.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the it's towards the whole. Okay, So I guess
we can use that to transition into the next subject,
because I think that's a good one. Do people want
to know that Tom Hanks was diddling kids? Or do
people want to know that billionaires who do business internationally
were being blackmailed and committing treeson against the American government.
It's slop versus like I mean, if you want to
know about Tom Hanks, well you're a slop monster and
you go fuck yourself.
Speaker 2: Yes, if I couldn't get couldn't care less in that sense.
I mean, I'd like them to be prosecuted, but I
couldn't care less.
Speaker 1: Well, if you want to know whether read hot, well,
I mean, you know they were diddling kids. I want
to see them come to justice too. But what's really
but the that is being used to ignore the fact
that people like say a Reid Hoffman was basically in
tears thinking about Trump coming to coming into power. And
Reid Hoffman is a client, was a client of Jeffrey Epstein.
And what did he do? Why was he so scared?
Was he scared because he was he trembling because oh
people might find out I was did I did older kid?
Or because they used this blackmail to get him to
do something that could get him the fate of the Rosenbergs.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of connection. You know, you asked me
to do a little bit of research on this, and
there's a lot of connections that I was really surprised about.
Speaker 4: Let's let's also not.
Speaker 2: Forget something really puzzling here is there's a grander story
in that there were two sets of files that we
had expected on day one would be fully and totally released.
It wasn't just Epstein, it was also the Jeff can files.
And the only reason why I think that both of
those sets of files haven't been fully released is for
the same reason, which I guess we could sort of
get into. If you'll recall, it was January or mid
January when Donald Trump issued an executive order this minament
day two or three, where he directed that all of
the JFK files be disclosed, and the intelligence agencies responded
by beginning the investigation, and very quickly they discovered something
like it was over two thousand new records related to
JFK's murder. So they said they were going to transfer
the files over. They had fifteen days to do it
under Trump's orders, and they've since passed that. There's a
new informal target of March ninth, so we'll see if
they keep track of that. Just to get that out
of the way now, obviously, you know, if you know
the Granddaddy of JFK conspiracy theories, which is the handshake
between LBJ and Ahod Barack. That's certainly a theory worth investigating.
I think it ties into the Epstein stuff. So obviously,
the first part of the first question you asked me
was with the Epstein files, will they ever be released fully?
So the day before we're recording this, we got an
answer to that they'll be released in phases, and so
Phase one there was a huge choreographed speakers event or
something was held and they handed out these Phase one binders,
white binders that contained information, as far as I've understood
by everybody who's talked about what's in them, information that
has already been leaked in the past, and even some
information that has been leaked unredacted in the past is
redacted in the newly released dj Phase one document. So,
how did you feel about they're calling it Phase one gate?
How'd you feel about that photo opportunity?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I agree with Dave Smith. If you
if you want to be transparent about a masad, you know,
raping kids, op, maybe not send a bunch of Zionists
and Jews over there to gather the information and give
them and then do a photo op with them, which
they swear isn't a photo op. Oh no, every he
was there to take pictures of Zelenski or Starmar. We're
just you know, no, screw you. I mean, get put
the whole thing online. Just put it online. That's all
you have to do right now, is just put it
on line. I mean, I've got Ryan Dawson. Ryan Dawson
has since two thousand and six been investigating this here.
I think he wrote his first article about this in
two thousand and five or two thousand and six. He's
combed through like the there's so much stuff that's public
about this that is already out there that they didn't release,
Like you can go and read testimonies of what people
said and you know what women said happened to them,
and all of this stuff is out there. And but
you know, the things that I think people are interested
in is like solid proof, Like because there's video, we
know that the Brownstone in New York was hooked up
for video and hooked up for audio. I don't, you know,
I don't want to see those exactly.
Speaker 2: You're talking about that the townhouse they rated twenty nineteen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I don't want to see those videos. I
don't want to hear the audio. All I'm interested in
is who the hell, Who the hell was a trader?
Who did what?
Speaker 4: Who was on the labels? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, who did what? Because they had been had had
been blackmailed, and who was doing the blackmailing? Who was
behind the blackmailing? I think you know, anyone with a
brain in their head knows that. Who knows who Jelaine
Macwell Maxwell's dad is, and knows what his ties were,
and knows how maybe even knows how he met his
final you know, how he shuffled off the mortal coil?
So good.
Speaker 2: I think Maxwell's how he met a who Barack. I mean,
that's certainly how he met Gallaen. The So the interesting
thing that I found out about the videos is so
they obviously there's been a bunch of foyas that have
been you know, they've they've sued the FBI to get
these these tapes because they want to see whose names
are on the tapes. And the FBI, this is very recently,
the FBI was arguing that they can't release these these
records because they they will interfere with ongoing law enforcement proceedings.
Now there aren't. There are not ongoing law enforcement proceedings.
Gallain's in court. That's how the FBI is concerned with that.
They are concerned. They stated that they were concerned in
the case of a potential retrial of Gallaine Maxwell or
are their co conspirators, that they wouldn't be able to
release any of these tapes. So again it's it's not
an ongoing investigation, it's they the FBI argued that they
can't release the tapes because of a potential thing that
isn't currently happening, a retrial, and that's why they're still
holding onto them now. It was you know, BONDI. I
don't know what happened in the room where they passed
that binder out, but my assumption is based on the
totally idiotic fourteen or fifteen alt media operatives that were
sent in there all tweeted the exact same thing at
nearly the exact same time that they were basically told.
If you look at all of the people who were there,
if you look at Liz Wheeler, Savannah Hernandez, what Cernovich said,
I mean, all of them said the same thing, which
is BONDI is fighting really hard because we found out
that the FBI, some people in the FBI are holding
back on documents, holding back on things, and that's why
they haven't been able to release even more damning material.
It was Bondie who knew when she was looking, she
didn't see any smoking guns, and that's what tipped her off.
So she's reinvestigating. You know, I don't even know what
can be said. It certainly sounds like something that you
would say, but I don't really know if it's true.
And what's really frustrating about it is.
Speaker 4: There is no.
Speaker 2: Oversight committee who is looking into what is going on
right now You've got and this goes, by the way,
this also goes for the JFK files too. Not to
keep pushing on that, but these two things are concurrent
and related. There's about three percent of JFK files, probably
the most sensitive thing because it hasn't been released. These
three percent of remaining files they found they haven't been
released because of the quote the effect to compromise national security,
interfere with law enforcement, or affect foreign relations. It's the
same thing they rolled out for why they can't release
or they weren't able to release under a Foyer previous
Epstein documents. It's a key in on the effect foreign
relations element of that. So both with the JFK files
in the Epstein files, you've got Chuck Grassley, who runs
the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. This guy hasn't issued
any statements confirming any reception of new documents in the
case of the JFK stuff, hasn't confirmed any interest to
investigate what's going on in relation to the FBI and
the Epstein files. Nothing hasn't set a thing. It's a
weekday that we're doing. This hasn't set a thing. And
then you have Jim Jordan, who runs the committee, the
Judiciary Committee in the House, and Jim Jordan's office is
more interested in rickrolling people about the full documentation. You
also have the National Archives, and the National Archives holds
these files. They've not confirmed any reception or review of
any of the new JFK documents that are causing a stall,
and they haven't said anything because they haven't said anything
about these supposedly to be received FBI documents in relation
to the Epstein files.
Speaker 4: So they're not saying anything either.
Speaker 2: So you know, Bondi is out here saying that more
information couldn't be released because of the victims and compromising
ongoing investigation. It's just all very puzzling. What active investigations
are going on that requires secrecy. We knew when Gelaine
Maxwell was being investigated, so it rings totally hollowed to me.
Every excuse that we've heard so far just rings totally
hollow to me.
Speaker 1: Well, and they've up until this point, they've always found
a way around this. Like you know, you'll say, oh,
Glaianne Maxwell was convicted of trafficking, so okay, Well who
was she trafficking to? Oh she was trafficking into Jeffrey Epstein.
Well that's convenient, of course. What was she trafficking into
Jeffrey Epstein? And for what purpose? I mean, who's behind this?
Who who gave this? How did this guy who basically
was like a substitute teacher all of a sudden get
access to one of the most expensive buildings townhouses in
New York and now is advising billionaires on their money.
How did this all? Well, howd he build his own ranch?
Howd he build his own ranch and basically pay payoff
a senator to get like zoning stuff lifted.
Speaker 4: I mean, it's well, remember.
Speaker 1: New Mexico or can we knuke New Mexico already? Because
everything bad, Everything in New Mexico's seems to be bad.
Poor Jeene Hacker cursed bad and cursed.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well you you remember what alex Acosta said about Epstein, Right,
he belonged to intelligence.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he belonged to he said, I was told he
belonged to intelligence. Okay, which intelligence? If you believe that
the CIA and the messada basically the same thing for
for they work in tandem. I remember Lieutenant Karen uh
Lieutenant Colonel Karen Quiitkowski, she goes on Judge Napp show
all the time. I remember her talking about how like
in the early two thousand, she was one of the
people who if a foreign delegation showed up to the Pentagon,
they would get somebody to escort them in, you know,
and show them around, or you know, just get them
to where they were. She said, Massad would just walk in.
Israelis were just walking.
Speaker 2: It's two family members looking at one another.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just like hey, hey.
Speaker 11: Hey, good to see you, good to see you. Listen,
it could be THEBI I brought hummus. I want to
defend the possibility that it could be you know that
the part of that that, I mean, there's a lot
of speculation on Epstein's operation, who was entangled with. There's
a massad CIA, there's you know, Unit eighty two hundred.
Can I let to say that anyway? There's also say
I say it all the time, it's.
Speaker 2: There's also the FBI. I really do think the FBI
they're fighting to keep name sealed. I mean, that is clear,
and it's probably because there wasn't. I don't remember who
reported it, but there was a it was reported that
I don't remember who reported this.
Speaker 4: Maybe you do.
Speaker 2: Epstein had shared his blackmail material with the FBI, and
that could be one reason why they want to keep
those details under wrapps because it was part of the
way for them to leverage various important people in the country.
This is kind of a mockingbird sort of thing. So
there's that also the possibility, of course, that it's just
to cover up to protect very valuable informants. And then
there was also you remember when Epstein, You remember when
Epstein got the Plea deal. That was the first time
that he was pulled in.
Speaker 1: Yes, it was.
Speaker 2: It was very lenient and bizarre, and it looked like
a cover up. And that's you get back to what costa.
Remember he said that it was you know, it was
very poor judgment and he said that straining not to
say something more meaningful than that. So there's all that,
and then of course, yes, Robert Maxwell, of course has
got the Masade connection connections, and it is a really
classic like honey trap. Masade is known for classic honey
traps Arab roy That's how they control a lot of
the Arab royalty. And again it was it was Maxwell
who had him meet with Galain, and Maxwell is the
one who fosters Epstein's relationship with Ahud Barack.
Speaker 4: And then like a.
Speaker 2: Who Barack and Epstein they invest in a lot of
these tech companies together. They're all tied in to the
same money making apparatus.
Speaker 4: And then that the main.
Speaker 2: Thing, you know, Unit eighty two hundred, it was Carbine
that they were all investing in. It was this health
technology thing. So they're all interconnected. So it's certainly the
case that the FBI has got a reason to cover up.
And it's certainly the case that like high level is
Raeli Zionist politicians, bureaucrats, tech investors, all of them have
a lot of interest in covering this stuff up. And
then it's obviously it's you know that mega group like
Wexner and Bromp, the Bromfman's Steinhardt. This is where everybody
should really go and listen to what Whitney Webb has
been doing on this.
Speaker 4: It's really great research.
Speaker 1: Everyone should go listen to what Ryan Dawson is doing
on it, because Whitney web is just repeating everything Ryan
Dawson has ever researched.
Speaker 4: Thank you, there you go.
Speaker 2: I'll have to go and watch Dawson stuff on this too.
And there's a lot of interrelated things. So I explain
to me, Pete if you can, what is the I mean,
what do you think is most likely? Is it all
just one cover up? Are there different cover ups going on?
Speaker 1: I mean, I think it's a little too easy to
say that it's all one cover up, you know, that's
the I think that's the easy way out. I think
things are usually more complicated than that when it comes
to all of these you know, the tentacles. And yes,
I'm using that for a reason. Yeah, you know, people
have make this point about did you know that Miriam
Adelson gave Donald Trump one hundred million dollars, And I'm
always like, yeah, do you know that Timothy Mellon gave
one hundred and seventy million and Elon Musk gave him
two hundred and fifty million. And how many times has
this sad? How many times have Saudi families bailed him
out when he was bankrupt? It seems like a lot
of people have hands in the pies here. So when
you're looking when you take into consideration what's happening in Ukraine,
which hurts international jewelry, when you take into consideration shutting
down USAID, which is a big source of their funding,
that seems to hurt these people. When you look at
what he's saying over and over again about Gaza, about
oh yeah, we're going to take it over, that basically
takes all the ideology away from it. It's like, this
isn't the This isn't like the Holy Land that's promised
to Israel anymore. This is like, oh no, we're going
to build casinos here. People don't seem to get that.
And also, you know, it's also you know, the Saudis,
but the Arabs believe that that's stair land. He's basically
taking these two parties out ideologically and being like, no, no,
it's going to be like an Indian reservation in the
United States. We're gonna build casinos and maybe we'll get
you know this, this he doesn't seem to be one
hundred percent on the side of Zionism as people would
expect him to be because of one hundred million dollars,
which just is my friend Stormy says that gets you
access to the White House. Maybe this is his Maybe
this is the way of paying back and paying those
people who like Adelson and her husband back in the
twenty sixteens for you know what they've given to him.
You know what they've donated to him.
Speaker 2: Did you see the the Q theory on why the
documents haven't all been released in full?
Speaker 1: Let me let me try and guess this one. Hold on,
let me see. So they tease that and it gets.
Speaker 2: Remember every Q theory is always remember that, every Q
theory is always that Donald Trump's going to do the
means to do the right thing.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, the last Q theory I saw I
had to do with something about preserving Jesus Christ's bloodline.
So no, I'm not even going to try and guess,
So go ahead.
Speaker 4: Well, it was of course that.
Speaker 2: Well, they just got the FBI directorship under control with
cash Patel. So the reason why they haven't released stuff yet,
of course, is because now Patella is getting a solid
group of agents together, so you can round up all
the suspects before they know they're being investigated.
Speaker 1: You know what's the craziest thing about that is that
is exactly what a good law enforcement department would do.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but it's not. But it's not gonna do.
Speaker 1: That, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2: That's good thing about every Q theory is that would
be what a smart and right wing organization would do.
Speaker 4: But it's never that. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I mean, you gotta give it to them there. They
want it so bad. It's when they started. You saw
that one about that this would preserve Trump's out there
trying to preserve Jesus, the bloodline of Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the Merivngian. Yeah, of course.
Speaker 1: I mean that's some Dan Brown shit.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: I mean it's like, literally, who's who's right in those sweets?
Is Dan? Is he that boored?
Speaker 4: It's pause?
Speaker 1: Oh I wish he would tell us it was him.
Oh God, that is so good.
Speaker 2: So the I mean The long story short is that
neither of these files are being released, and it's probably
because what would be released would be damaging to our
foreign relations with Israel.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's why.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because cutting off the money, cutting off the money
supply is one thing, cutting off Ukraine is another. The
one he's doing with Gaza is really odd to me
because that one seems like they'd be pushing back on
that really hard. And maybe that's what happened with everything
that's going on in the West Bank. And yes, I
do know that the West Bank and Gaza are not
the same thing. People, So yeah, don't don't fucking comment
to me and send me emails. Maybe, yeah, I mean,
knowing that if here's a question, here's a question I'll
throw back at you, Bert, would if the American people
found out that this was a massade up and that
people were raping kids for Israel? Do you think that
do you think that would change the I mean, and
I'm not a populist either, I'm an elitist. Would that
even change the general population's opinion of Israel? Or are
they so far gone?
Speaker 4: Oh I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean half of the country already has this sort
of a negative opinion.
Speaker 4: I don't know if it were.
Speaker 2: Well, I guess the next level of your question is
to answer the question would it make a functional difference
to the people who benefit? And I just don't think
it would. I don't think that that kind of a
revelation would rise to the level of a revolt. And
so I don't expect any reason why there wouldn't be
a change in business as usual. Sure, you could get
a lot more representatives, Okay, so let's just do the
math out of all of the representatives in the House,
people in the Senate. What percentage of those people would
take a genuinely anti Israel position. Probably less than two percent,
maybe two percent just a wild ballpark. Guess you got
three hundred people. Yeah, maybe six or seven of them
would take a genuine anti Israel position on something something
that would actually structurally harm Israel. I can see if
we really believe the idea that the general population is
voting for those representatives out of the field of representatives
that they are allowed to choose from. If it really mattered,
then the powers that be would just tweak who the
American people are presented with. So I don't think it
would make a single difference at all structurally if information
like that would be revealed. But I do think that
it would allow for because I do think it would
be genuinely scandalous to the American people, maybe to the
point of greater protest or something to that effect, and
that would be exactly what the regime would want, because
protests all they do is function to burn off people
with you know, energy and strong opinions on things. So
I think it would totally work in their favor. I
don't think that's how you damage our relationship with Israel
at all. I think it's got to be a top
down and it can come through internal influence potentially, But yeah,
I don't think a general revelation to the American public
would do a thing at all.
Speaker 1: Okay, so what if it was what if it was
released that you know, Israel Masade whomever, Israeli intelligence, you know,
Massad is sort of a boogeyman, and people can straw
man the hell out of that just saying Israeli intelligence
was responsible for not only Epstein and everything he was doing,
and that everything he was doing was for the benefit
of Israel. And they found out that Israeli intelligence was,
if not behind or help plan the JFK assassination. I
say there was like a political turn.
Speaker 2: Well, can I just say, I just don't think they
would ever release anything like that about the JFK assassination
because I think that would be a genuine challenge structurally.
Speaker 1: Well, what I was going to ask you is if
that was, if that were to happen, would you see
wealthy Jews in this country turn on Israel for the
sake of their own self preservation?
Speaker 4: Oh wow, I don't know. Well what do you.
Speaker 1: Guys, because here here, here, because here's I'll just on
a on a smaller level. So like you had basically
the woke that you know what we call this woke ideology,
All this stuff that you know was on that was
on that slack channel and everything they came out of
another straw man boogeyman the Frankfurt school and and places
like that, and it's they admit you can look, I mean,
the first transgender clinic in the world was run by
by by hirsch Hirschfeld out of out of Wymar. This
is this is something that was created by Jews and
when it came back to bite them in the ass,
sort of like immigration is coming back to bite them
in the ass. You see, you saw a whole bunch
of left wing Jews all of a sudden become right
wing when they saw you know, ones who formerly supported
progressive causes, when they saw people after October seventh, you know,
kids getting out on college campuses and basically saying these
are colonizers because Jews are white. They turned on a
dime and they adapted, just like they always have. You know,
I'm reading two hundred Years together on my show with
doctor Matthew or f Al Johnson, and just into chapter four,
we've already seen how depending on what the what the
Tzar was doing and what kind of proclamations he put down,
the Jews would have one attitude or they change it.
They're fluid. They they just they're looking to survive. So
I'm wondering if you wouldn't see the same thing that
they'd be willing to sacrifice Israel just so that they
could survive, especially if they're in this country and they
do literally are worth a billion dollars and it's not
you know, a billion dollars of international jewryze money where
they're just walking around as a bank count.
Speaker 2: Well, can can you can you like to find what
you mean by survive. I think I could come up
with my idea of it if I knew what you
what you meant well.
Speaker 1: I mean, one thing that we know about Jews is
you rarely see Jews come out and criticize Jewish behavior
or criticize what Israel's doing. You know that, you know
it's always somebody else's fault that they would come out
and say, yeah, that they would actually turn on their
fellow Jews and be like, yeah, what what they did
was completely wrong and I have to wash my hands
of Israel. I could never support Israel ever again. And
you know, to be like, I'm one of the good ones.
Speaker 2: That is certainly already happening. Yeah, that is certainly already happening.
But I don't I do. What I wonder is you
the Appara could talk like that, But I guess we
need to know what is really that the binding a
myth of the elite class preserving these kinds of interests
is in who's in that class?
Speaker 1: I mean, at this point, I think the I don't
know if it's a myth. I think it's just survival.
That's pretty much what you've seen throughout history and then
when something happens, when they have a chance to get power,
they immediately take it. When they have a chance to
get influence, they immediately take it. And when it's you know,
attacks start happening, they go into survival mode, change their names,
and convert to Christianity, all sorts of things. I mean,
this is this is I mean, this isn't and this
isn't a conspiracy theory. This is documented in like Jewish encyclopedias.
Speaker 2: I don't I don't see that the revelation that Epstein
was a like an Israeli masade operation and that JFK
was killed at least in part by Zionists. I don't
see that that would threaten the I don't see that
that would threaten the survival of Jews and the existence
of Israel.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's that. That's the opinion one of the opinions
I was asking for. Yeah, I just, I just I
think Americans are I think Americans are so fucked that
they that you're probably right.
Speaker 2: Does the average American? Does the average American even get
to have the say in those questions? I think the
answers clearly know well.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think elites are in charge but I
think elites also know how to read the tea leaves.
One thing that elites don't want is a revolution.
Speaker 2: Yes, and I'm I'm that would be really interesting, which
they may be able very well to do. But that
that's a really interesting question that we would probably need
an entire episode to just think about, is would those
conditions set a revolution? And really every revolution is sort
of just a recycling of who the new elite are,
so that could be a valid way for the regime
to preserve itself. I guess the real question is, well,
because if the regime is preserving itself, then Israel may
not be at risk in that case anyway, The real
question is would it cause you know, chaos, would it
cause a breakdown in the current system?
Speaker 4: And I think the answer to that is no.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, Well, I mean that's a good I mean,
that's an opinion that I think is educated. Because you
live through twenty you live through the financial crisis, like
I did, you live through twenty twenty, like I did?
You live through J six, like I did? You've lived
through all this where the American people just don't care
because they don't care.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and our structural our structural politique is made in
such a way.
Speaker 4: That there there has there.
Speaker 2: I can't I can't personally imagine the conditions that would
have to occur where the federal government would or the
state governments would would lose control in a way that
would threaten the existence of jewsing this country or israel I.
I just don't see it again that I could be
someone could definitely, I'm open to that, but it really
would require a lot of thought about that. I don't
think so just off handedly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm trying to find this this twite by by
Martyr made by Darryl that I shared. It was a
tweet that he made back in uh it was in
August of last year. It was sometime last year where
he basically said that one of the reasons why he
why J six, you know, he's not going to get
upset even if the J six protesters were trying to
overthrow the government, is because when Epstein ended up dead
in jail, that should have been the final straw. And
if they're not going to do anything at this point,
then you know whatever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the tolerance level to overthrow something like the current
federal system is just it would have to be so
so low you'd have to have the military defecting. Yeah,
guys like you and me, I mean we are a
lot of us really would be passive in that kind
of an exchange of power.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: That's I think is we'd all be watching it unfold
on TV.
Speaker 1: Well, and I'm not even talking about like taking up arms.
I'm talking about like, you know, like, oh, we're going
to march on Washington, like demanding your lawmakers even change everything,
say this cannot this cannot stand anymore. Yeah, he said,
I support j Sex pro support protesters because what happened
with Epstein was reason enough to overthrow the government. And
I'm not going to quibble over the details of how
it gets done. I wouldn't feel cheated out of justice
if in and made escape death row only to get
hit by a bus, you know. I mean, it doesn't
necessarily have to be for the sake of any you know,
agents listening talking about overthrowing the government. I don't think
that that's a that's wise. I don't think arms revolution
in those countries even could even Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I never you be revolting against It would
look exactly like the Floyd protests, just a total waste
of time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's no head of the snake. So you know,
I mean even demanding, I mean like like having like
calling quote unquote, and I know these are basically impotent,
but like constitutional convention to say, look we need to
you know, like large swaths of influential people doing that.
It's just not going to happen. It's not going to happen. So,
you know, whatever Donald Trump is doing, you know, I'm fine.
I'm perfectly fine with him trying to dismantle the managerial state.
But while he's trying to do that, I'm going to
be over here doing my own thing. You know, I'm
going to be over within the law. I'm going to
be doing my own thing to make you know, myself
and the people I care about as prosperous as possible.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And in the and in the meanwhile, we the the
other thing, the other context to the whole conversation is
the regulatory bureaucracy is being is being dismantled before our eyes,
and we are entering a new phase of this country.
And the kind of question what relationship does the does
American opinion of Israel have to do with how Israel
ensures its own survival is going to be decentralized in
a manner that will make it even less related public
opinion to the survival of that country and the funding
that goes to it. So this is the case of
Israel really as a sovereign country. Nothing outside of it
I don't think at this point really fundamentally threatens its
existence as a state currently in the form that it is,
with the system that it has. At the same time,
to go way back to the beginning of this, the
way that our federal government treats the apparatics of that
project is also changing, and so we may find out
later that these kind of things occurred that maybe jfk Oh,
maybe there was some Masad connection. By the way, I
don't think any of this stuff would ever be communicated
on office copy anyway. So it's gonna go. It's gone
to the grave with people. But we may learn one
or two names that connects to Israel have a lot
of money and we're involved in it. And we may
even learn that LBJ turned a blind eye to something,
or I don't think we'll ever learn that LBJ did it.
Speaker 4: But I think.
Speaker 2: First of all this information there's no reason to release it,
and there's a lot of reason to continue slow walking it.
And so even if it does get released, a lot
of the juiciest stuff would never have been written down anyway,
would never have been found in any investigation anyway. So
we might get to the point where, even if the
response to the release in full would fundamentally have been
a threat in a liberal democracy to Israel's existence. Whatever
our country is turning into severely decentralizes public opinions, ability
to shift public policy further than it already was displaced.
So yeah, I think we're entering.
Speaker 4: A new era.
Speaker 2: And uh, you know, I'm not gonna say it joyfully,
but the conditions have already been set as we go
into this next phase.
Speaker 4: Uh And yeah, I just don't think.
Speaker 2: I think we may have some impact in ways we
don't expect on things coming, but all this stuff is
just matters the past.
Speaker 1: By the way, our friend who I tagged says suka
definitely means bitch in Russian and Ukrainian. So yeah, that's.
Speaker 4: Uh, yeah, I believe it.
Speaker 1: We the wee little the we little man. Yeah, I
mean just a child, I mean just a child, any
and let's let's never forget he's just an actor. He's
just an actor.
Speaker 4: He's an act generous, he's a comedian.
Speaker 1: He's a comedian who was on a show playing somebody
who got elected to be prep I mean, it's it's
fucking reachsharded. It's reached. It's like, it's like a terrible like.
I know, there are some made for Netflix movies that
are like decent made for Netflix shows, but like ten
years ago when you had the Mad for Netflix stuff
where you turned it on You're like, oh, this is
cringe as hell. That guy's whole story arc is cringe
as hell.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's I can't wait untill you don't see him anymore.
And the last time.
Speaker 1: It would be a lot funnier if there weren't, you know,
probably like a million and a half people dead because
of him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, of course, I mean, of course, like at some
point in that final conversation, and I can't say final,
because I really do think that he had to have
realized that this is it. I've already I've I can't
go back now, I've just ruined whatever semblance of a
relationship there was. So yeah, it's it's over for him.
Speaker 1: And it's over for us, all right, plug away?
Speaker 2: Well, I am the proprietor of America's number one news
tracking podcast in America America made. We are t l
E Timeline Earth. You can find us on any podcatcher.
You can find us on our Timeline Earth Patreon. We
have just started releasing. Me and my co host Pause
have just started releasing a what will amount to a
forty to fifty something episode coverage of the legendary Bill
Cooper's Mystery Babylon Theory, which tracks the Schitzo school of
the Right Wings theory on how power works. It talks
about well everything from the anc into Babylonian mystery religion,
to the Freemasons, to the Rosa Crucians, Egyptian magic, solar cults,
child sacrifice, the Vatican, all kinds of crazy stuff, the
Granddaddy of all conspiracies, and we're going to be going
through all forty something episodes of it with commentary. I
got a huge rave response for the first episode. It
seems like we have a lot of people who are
very excited to be on board. And you can join
us for just a price of a slice of pizza.
That'll be four dollars and twenty cents a month. You
can pay and you can join us and you'll get
that episode weekly as we go through it. So it's
been a huge thing. Pete, I hope you're on board
with us. This is true original Schizo stuff that we
are rediscovering and watching with one another. But I'm just
very excited to do it. And pauses too, So go
over to our timeline earth Patreon and you can join
us in listening.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I got a little hour and a half drive
I got to do tomorrow is planning on listening to
it while I'm dying.
Speaker 2: I'll give you a tip, and all the listeners who
are now going to pour over there a tip. Rewatch
two thousand and one, A Space Odyssey. The first episode
is a movie review slash revelation that Kubrick was telling
us the origin story of the elite mystery schools.
Speaker 1: Awesome. Awesome that that sounds like the kind of good
Schitzo stuff that I love.
Speaker 5: Me too.
Speaker 4: Man, It's something.
Speaker 1: Take care of yourself now, peace,