Speaker 1: Oh welcome. Looks like good might be a two part
Speaker 1: of tonight flocking balance here what the flock is going on?
Speaker 1: Beside there would being a hair raid on top of
Speaker 1: the microphone. Okats, all right, let's get this started. What
Speaker 1: the flock is going on here? Just to remind everybody,
Speaker 1: Oh wait, hoole lot, I gotta pop up this video.
Speaker 1: You know it the slowliness of getting started. Come on
Speaker 1: always mute, well fardy, That's what I've learned. Come on,
Speaker 1: bring it up, Bring up the fucking page. So getting started.
Speaker 1: There you go, there, we are all right, everybody's on
Speaker 1: some refreshers move over here they we you're good. Hrvats
Speaker 1: in the house. I think I think that's new. They
Speaker 1: don't put dates their times on these. They don't times
Speaker 1: they have them all right. So you have seen down
Speaker 1: below here if you're looking for the ninetyes centrals is
Speaker 1: right there and also on the wrong bole if you're
Speaker 1: looking for there's something else. Oh yeah, the band by
Speaker 1: Amazon for COVID bbe Dana ten percent off there Doctor
Speaker 1: Glynnin's direct website, I'm sorry, not website, but page where
Speaker 1: I put all his videos on like that. They're right
Speaker 1: there and that way they're separated from the rest of
Speaker 1: the channel just because they're down both. But that place
Speaker 1: is exclusively doctor Manso and Doctor Gladen videos when stop
Speaker 1: shop for all that? Okay? And then on top here,
Speaker 1: like I said, you see the Azure standard stuff, and
Speaker 1: I yeah, you're seeing nothing that I'm showing you at all.
Speaker 1: What the fuck? There no step being a cocksmoker. So
Speaker 1: again right here you used to roll down, right there
Speaker 1: is for the ninety essentels on the rumble side of
Speaker 1: things by the writer is there too, Yeah, you see
Speaker 1: right here is the Azure Standard stuff. And then above
Speaker 1: it you can go right to my website and click it.
Speaker 1: Someone asked Joseep. He asked earlier, I thought your book
Speaker 1: was right on top. Well it is, it says books.
Speaker 1: But also I did move the icon so before you
Speaker 1: used to be right here, and my creative was like, sorry,
Speaker 1: my creat team is right there too, but I just
Speaker 1: moved it out. I moved it around so that people
Speaker 1: are who are coming to a hot sauce site for
Speaker 1: hot sauce seed that first I thought it made no
Speaker 1: more sense. So do you grow scroll the school, scroll scroll,
Speaker 1: scroll scroll book. See there you go, but you could
Speaker 1: just go like this too, Bam Canada see that all right?
Speaker 1: And what we're trying to do is get the second
Speaker 1: book underway. Yeah, let me read with this, says Book
Speaker 1: two campaign is underway. The topic the Gothic Eda, our
Speaker 1: European Mediterranean Bible, predating all other Bibles by three thousand years.
Speaker 1: This is our story and the story of civilization. Please
Speaker 1: help me carry on the most important work of Ellie
Speaker 1: Widell by taking his edit translation and showing the update,
Speaker 1: a updated battle between good and evil for our between
Speaker 1: good and evil, all people, all people wage against the
Speaker 1: Saturn rem fan Moon colt of child sacrifice in the
Speaker 1: present day. This is historical preservation, restoration and survival. Why
Speaker 1: is that doing that? Please pledge a dono to the
Speaker 1: book writing fun dat gives a go And then there's
Speaker 1: a link. And again no, I did not I did
Speaker 1: not change the video, but it did change the goofy
Speaker 1: as fucking way to stop like like, hey, let's you
Speaker 1: know all the effort that I put in the video. Hey,
Speaker 1: let's find the goofiest fucking out of context, freeze frame
Speaker 1: and use that. Fuck you people, all right? Book two
Speaker 1: campaign and the auth that get to rate there man,
Speaker 1: and then it says, if you plage fifty dollars more,
Speaker 1: you will receive a sign six by nine copy of
Speaker 1: my book. If you plage hundred dollars more, you receive
Speaker 1: a sign eight and a half by eleven colt copy
Speaker 1: of my first book. Maybe if they wanted to arrange
Speaker 1: that to be something different, like I don't know the
Speaker 1: next one, I guess, but that would be you're gonna
Speaker 1: have to wait because it's nothing. And yeah, who had
Speaker 1: missed to killing a whole family with Eric Klopper? What
Speaker 1: the whole family has on? Alright? So the a I flock?
Speaker 1: What the flock is happening here? We've got a couple
Speaker 1: of things to go over. Yesterday it didn't stay up.
Speaker 1: I uh, there was a couple of things in there.
Speaker 1: There's a couple of things that I didn't I didn't
Speaker 1: want to uh. I just didn't feel like it was
Speaker 1: I don't think it was right or wise maintain. So
Speaker 1: that one went away. You guys who were here got
Speaker 1: to see it. Those who did not. Dot shit, h beer.
Speaker 1: It's happened every once in a while that I look
Speaker 1: back and I'm like, hmmm, because somebody be busting down
Speaker 1: my fucking door because of that last video. Why do
Speaker 1: I have to think about that? Just leave the fucking video?
Speaker 1: So I did, all right, here we go, and yes,
Speaker 1: on my website, you just click this. You use BB
Speaker 1: five no matter where you're doing. You use BB five
Speaker 1: at the Azubell BB five bro bluha Vive. That's where
Speaker 1: the azurebel products the cupon code for the hot sauces
Speaker 1: right here. Now, this video is long, and I have
Speaker 1: to be out of here by six thirty and this
Speaker 1: is basically gonna take up all the time. So there's
Speaker 1: gonna be a part two to this because we have
Speaker 1: to talk about the Skynet moment, how mythos Ai just
Speaker 1: changed cybersecurity forever. There's that. There's a couple of things,
Speaker 1: and I think actually there might be one other aspect
Speaker 1: to the the mythos that I just heard about that
Speaker 1: I was just watching. Let me check in my YouTube
Speaker 1: history because I feel like I'm missing something that I
Speaker 1: wanted to also share that may not pay here. I
Speaker 1: like that look at this one.
Speaker 2: You can't talk Hello and helis comments and Smala and
Speaker 2: academic lead at the highest or the alt right very
Speaker 2: and Damala rise the wound books on his middle Zi
Speaker 2: come from the London training and the doctor shot the
Speaker 2: name proct was artist Luto mission listed that and how
Speaker 2: camls blonde. It's last in half th time and finishes
Speaker 2: off the line on the piece and that's place and
Speaker 2: the only visit the le among the farms and supreme
Speaker 2: and Fay and part proprom but you train and almost
Speaker 2: the doctor field that sep and the farmers from alphabet
Speaker 2: draft blown with either that frown from brown heavy was
Speaker 2: and also liber is that I know the idy fantasics
Speaker 2: you're currently and the bear and then you Troy and
Speaker 2: son on him fair where vice is keep it feeling
Speaker 2: feels this is feel but they for mina laba and
Speaker 2: the secondly the ass and and it's pinces desay pricked
Speaker 2: off draft. That's word of a drump foot on my physician.
Speaker 2: I will say this time pro brain es keep you
Speaker 2: feel under outcome and then camps to us that destable
Speaker 2: naming cos this is saying how we see it and
Speaker 2: then fire from yours stream. Then the pencil, not my
Speaker 2: adviser will be inflect of my assuring me of their paces.
Speaker 2: When I'm you heart word or a nicheans I need
Speaker 2: to approve to goo to that gilling and keeping then
Speaker 2: steamers shops to get what the fucking and're.
Speaker 1: Fucking with him a little bit, which I don't like.
Speaker 1: But nobody, nobody ever went to fucking argentated dude, fucking
Speaker 1: guy died.
Speaker 3: Really see it?
Speaker 1: And I mean, really that's the thing. Oh no, it's not.
Speaker 1: It's another parody. Okay, well that's not what I was
Speaker 1: looking for. I don't know what the fuck that is.
Speaker 1: But let's go into the history for a second. It
Speaker 1: loses it's ha ha when it's so fucking fast and
Speaker 1: not like, yeah, I don't speak that language that well
Speaker 1: or at all. Could you slow it down a little bit, motherfucker?
Speaker 1: Thank you? Ah No, Maybe there wasn't there. Maybe it
Speaker 1: was on a different site that I was watching something.
Speaker 1: I know I saw something that was talking about the mythos.
Speaker 1: Maybe I just have to write that claude mythos. Let's
Speaker 1: see if there's anything that cops up nonanthropic. There you go,
Speaker 1: got in a box. No, it's all fat shit, it's
Speaker 1: all fact shit. Unless you have a direct link to something.
Speaker 1: It's all the bullshit, fucking PuF puff piece, bullshit, cocksucking nonsense, like, Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is what I want. I want to look at
Speaker 1: this asshole. That's what I want. How do you know,
Speaker 1: how do you know I want to look at look
Speaker 1: at Bushnanger. Fuck you, fuck you but an insult piece
Speaker 1: of shit. All right, let's go to this one. Fuck
Speaker 1: it's hey, search Jews, Jews, CNN, fuck you.
Speaker 4: Ring cameras in their competition have created not only a
Speaker 4: privacy disaster, but also the potential for an Orwellian police
Speaker 4: state in the future athletics, the police state by the state,
Speaker 4: or the police state by the mega corporations. But what
Speaker 4: Ritt and companies like could do is sell the promise
Speaker 4: of security to their customers that's you, and then sell
Speaker 4: data collection and surveillance to governments and other corporations they
Speaker 4: partner with. People have built a connected webinar of cameras
Speaker 4: where every neighborhood that has Ring cameras every apartment complex
Speaker 4: is surveilling the hallways of the apartments, the streets of
Speaker 4: the neighborhood, and is able to track and use AI
Speaker 4: technology to identify people, cars, and even in pets to
Speaker 4: effectively create a privately controlled surveillance network that is capable
Speaker 4: of providing state access in the case of Amazon, which
Speaker 4: owns RAIN, and these private companies are also with the government.
Speaker 4: The company recently paid Blania Trump, for example, tens of
Speaker 4: millions of dollars in talent fees. But they also have
Speaker 4: a lot of direct partnerships that we'll get into. Ring
Speaker 4: founder Jamie Simonoff recently rejoined the company and immediately began
Speaker 4: building more bridges between RAIN and law enforcement agencies while
Speaker 4: integrating AI technologies into RAIN software. Rain partnered with Taser
Speaker 4: and bodycam company acts On Enterprise to allow RING customers
Speaker 4: to share videos with local agencies in April twenty twenty five,
Speaker 4: and then Ring added video surveillance company Flock Safety as
Speaker 4: a partner in October. Renintroduced facial recognition technology with friendly
Speaker 4: branding of what they called familiar Faces in December. All
Speaker 4: of this is in addition to Ring's previous track record
Speaker 4: of employees spying on thousands of women through their Ring cameras. Somehow,
Speaker 4: these things get worse when considering other surveillance companies like
Speaker 4: Flock have investment from the founder's fund, which is run
Speaker 4: by frequent flyer to Jeffrey Epstein's inbox and recipient of
Speaker 4: investment from Epstein, Peter Teel, Rien and Flock aren't even
Speaker 4: the only ones. But the problem with these Internet connected cameras,
Speaker 4: especially or cameras that use cloud attached services and data
Speaker 4: centers is that they can track anybody anywhere, and you
Speaker 4: don't know how that data is going to be useful
Speaker 4: at some point to somebody. This especially should be concerning
Speaker 4: because it's not even just the private companies that you
Speaker 4: need to worry about. It's also attackers. Maybe there's a
Speaker 4: vulnerability in the system, or maybe maybe the US government
Speaker 4: has pissed off someone that has state backed hacking and
Speaker 4: cyber attack groups. For example, if the government associated with
Speaker 4: these companies that so desperately want to be part of
Speaker 4: the military industrial complex is creating enemies, then you might
Speaker 4: get something like when Iran stated that Amazon is part
Speaker 4: of quote enemy technology infrastructure end quote and actually Amazon
Speaker 4: even had a data center golf line in relation to
Speaker 4: a drone strike. State sponsored hackers are overlooked but exist
Speaker 4: in nearly every nation, but there's also vulnerabilities from just
Speaker 4: normal breaches or from terms of service and conditions you've
Speaker 4: agreed to with products where they can use this data
Speaker 4: for non sinister things too, not just blackmail vectors but
Speaker 4: selling you stuff marketing. Don't worry, though, because Ring Cameras
Speaker 4: founder wants you to know that AI will help keep
Speaker 4: everyone safer.
Speaker 5: Permission to make neighborhoods safer once felt like something we
Speaker 5: could always work towards but probably never fully achieve. Today
Speaker 5: I stand here believing that the advancements in AI have
Speaker 5: truly changed.
Speaker 6: That the backlash has been a little bit around this
Speaker 6: concept of like, is this surveillance, It's actually not. It's
Speaker 6: allowing your camera to be an intelligent assistant for you
Speaker 6: and then allowing you to be a great neighbor. So
Speaker 6: really trying to take the AI and superpower it so
Speaker 6: that you are like that we're doing the work for
Speaker 6: you and you're only interacting with Ring when you need to.
Speaker 4: The better the image.
Speaker 6: Quality, the more impact we can have with AI.
Speaker 5: I'm excited to anounce Familiar Faces, a feature that transform
Speaker 5: how your Ring camera can alert you Using AI. We
Speaker 5: sample your camera's video quality multiple time per day for
Speaker 5: up to two weeks, and it only works because of
Speaker 5: our custom edge AI silicon.
Speaker 6: Alexa certainly will be the centerpiece as the like agenic
Speaker 6: AI to it.
Speaker 4: Rings Corporate overlord Amazon has added more AI capabilities to
Speaker 4: Ring cameras. The good news is that Amazon is trustworthy
Speaker 4: and has never been the subject of spine allegations.
Speaker 7: Amazon has agreed to pay more than thirty million dollars
Speaker 7: to settle allegations of privacy violations involving its voice assistant
Speaker 7: Alexa and Ring doorbell cameras.
Speaker 4: Okay, right, not a good example, but it's not like
Speaker 4: Amazon's ever been accused of spine on kids or something.
Speaker 1: Alexa. Amazon now has to fork over something like twenty
Speaker 1: five million dollars to settle allegations that Alexa violated the
Speaker 1: privacy rights of kids.
Speaker 4: In another deep dive episode of the AI dystopian hellscape
Speaker 4: that we're currently witness sing Rise, We're going to dig
Speaker 4: into ring cameras and the public outcry against Ring's latest
Speaker 4: AI foray, and we found some some pretty nasty connections here,
Speaker 4: and all these companies seem to be linked to each
Speaker 4: other and to the government. We brought you this video
Speaker 4: with our brand new wireframe V two mousemat on store
Speaker 4: dot Camerasaxcess dot net also a company buy our two
Speaker 4: microslop t shirt that's on its way to our warehouse
Speaker 4: right now. These feature a parody micro slop logo with
Speaker 4: the blue screen of death, frowny face warning marks from
Speaker 4: event viewer, and our rendition of Tucks the Penguin hidden Away,
Speaker 4: and of course microslop so everyone you pass either if
Speaker 4: you work there for now or they know your thoughts
Speaker 4: on AI. The wireframe V two mousemat on the gen
Speaker 4: Store was made by Andrew on the team in Blender,
Speaker 4: fully three D modeled and then represented in a high
Speaker 4: quality mousemat that you see here. The map can easily
Speaker 4: accommodate a keyboard and mouse has fine detail, with the
Speaker 4: city built of wireframe components for the heat sink ram
Speaker 4: because let's be honest, it's the only place any of
Speaker 4: us can get any now and cooling tubes, and we
Speaker 4: use a matching blue stitching for anti fray with a
Speaker 4: blue rubber underside for some unique gn flare. We modeled
Speaker 4: these two ridiculous levels of depth in that there are
Speaker 4: things in the model that you can't even see in
Speaker 4: the product because we went that deep with it, like,
Speaker 4: for example, the springs underneath the switch underneath the keycap
Speaker 4: that's represented in the matt's surface head to store doct cameras,
Speaker 4: access dot net to support our deep dive independent research
Speaker 4: content like this directly. Recently, Ring showed millions of people
Speaker 4: a Super Bowl ad where Ring's new Search Party feature
Speaker 4: was able to find lost dogs.
Speaker 6: One coast of a dog's photo in the Ring app
Speaker 6: starts outdoor cameras looking for a match. Search Party from
Speaker 6: Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs.
Speaker 4: Competitor wise quickly chimed into parody them.
Speaker 8: This is Milo TETs her family. But every year ten
Speaker 8: million of them go missing, and the ways we look
Speaker 8: for them haven't changed in years except for all of these.
Speaker 8: But what if we could make finding one lost dog
Speaker 8: require the computational power of a small dictator led nation state.
Speaker 8: Search Party from Ring uses AI to search through our
Speaker 8: tens millions of cameras. We could find literally anyone. But
Speaker 8: we only use this technology to find lost dogs. Recently,
Speaker 8: we announced a partnership with over five thousand law enforcement agencies,
Speaker 8: but we won't let them use this feature. This feature
Speaker 8: is just for dogs. Guess what we've automatically often your
Speaker 8: cameras in who has time to read settings?
Speaker 1: Not you.
Speaker 8: You're too busy being a hero, whether you know it
Speaker 8: or not. And the best part, it's free. For everyone.
Speaker 8: We're just doing this out of the goodness of our hearts.
Speaker 8: Customers are loving Search Party and so will you.
Speaker 4: And that last frame we're showing is the best one.
Speaker 4: Ring's founder acted like he hadn't seen this, and then
Speaker 4: he called it imitation and said he's flattered that competition
Speaker 4: is copying that.
Speaker 6: I hadn't even seen that, So I guess what is it?
Speaker 6: Are the best thing is imitating art or something. There's
Speaker 6: there's some sort of a life or so there's there's
Speaker 6: something in there. I guess I'm honored that, you know,
Speaker 6: people want to copy what we do.
Speaker 4: Which is some wild misdirection seeing as why didn't copy
Speaker 4: them they made fun of them. But Rain also had
Speaker 4: a partnership with Flock Safety, and flock Safety has faced
Speaker 4: accusations of a partnership with Ice. So it turns out
Speaker 4: the lost Dogs might actually stand for people, and the
Speaker 4: Search Party might stand for roving gains of untrained paramilitary
Speaker 4: going door to door. The backlash over privacy concerns was
Speaker 4: swift and predictable. Rain subsequently stated that it canceled its
Speaker 4: partnership with Flock Safety, blaming difficulties with integration certainly nothing
Speaker 4: to do with the public's concerns about flocked data being
Speaker 4: accessible to federal agencies like ICE. But this is only
Speaker 4: a bump in the road, since Rain plans to implement
Speaker 4: more integrations with other quote established providers in the future
Speaker 4: end quote. Now four or four media reported on internal
Speaker 4: emails from Rain's CEO where he said features like search
Speaker 4: Party will help Rain quote zero out crime in neighborhoods
Speaker 4: end quote, which he has also said public.
Speaker 6: It's always crazy to say something like zero out crime,
Speaker 6: but it's a good goal to have. And I think
Speaker 6: that's what we're trying to do, is take the goal
Speaker 6: of like how far can we go in affecting this
Speaker 6: now with AI.
Speaker 4: So he the operator of a private company, wants to
Speaker 4: zero out crime with AI and surveillance capabilities. As for
Speaker 4: the privacy concerns, rin is whitewashing its surveillance apparatus, whose
Speaker 4: data centers again are now the target of a nation
Speaker 4: that the US is at war with with images of
Speaker 4: puppies and then stating that people are just misinformed about
Speaker 4: the technology. It's only going to be used to find puppies.
Speaker 6: A lot of it's I'll call it, it's not misinformation.
Speaker 6: It's a misunderstanding of how the system works.
Speaker 4: If it can identify a dog, they can identify a person.
Speaker 4: Ring's partnership with Flock is dead, they say, But Rain's
Speaker 4: software still enables law enforcement through request footage through its
Speaker 4: integration with Axon. Axon works with the Department of Homeland
Speaker 4: Security agencies like Immigrations and Customs Enforcement or ICE and
Speaker 4: Customs and Border Protection, and federal agencies share information with
Speaker 4: each other, as well as state, local, tribal, and international
Speaker 4: partners using tools like Palenteers Immigration OS system for ICE,
Speaker 4: with Palenteer being the Teal backed and then VIDIA backed
Speaker 4: military industrial surveillance company. Even though Rain and Flock insists
Speaker 4: that they don't work with ICE, federal agencies often obtain
Speaker 4: evidence from local police agencies, which do work with Rain
Speaker 4: and Flock. We live in a world where millions of
Speaker 4: security cameras are recording all of the time, and that
Speaker 4: means that whether or not you own one, you're probably
Speaker 4: getting tracked by them. It's okay to have security cameras,
Speaker 4: The problem is when they're cloud connected, especially when they're
Speaker 4: consumer grade security cameras that are on homes and neighborhoods,
Speaker 4: on doors of apartments and complexes. They're cloud connected to
Speaker 4: someone else's drives and someone else's data center, storing it
Speaker 4: to then be maybe even just used as training data,
Speaker 4: if not for more sinister purposes. And security cameras do
Speaker 4: serve a purpose for security, but the mega corporators have
Speaker 4: managed to shift people away from ownership and self hosting
Speaker 4: of your security devices, moving it all into the cloud
Speaker 4: where they can basically do whatever they want with the data.
Speaker 4: And unfortunately, if your neighbors are using cloud connected to services,
Speaker 4: even if you're self hosted, it's still at risk for
Speaker 4: everyone around them. Amazon bought Rain in twenty eighteen for
Speaker 4: a paltry one billion dollars, an amount so little that
Speaker 4: you could launch drones and missiles for a full day,
Speaker 4: and Raydon said that two companies would quote accelerate the
Speaker 4: mission to reduce crime in neighborhoods end quote after the
Speaker 4: sale closed, Rain's founder Jamie Simonov left the company in
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three, shortly before the FTC find Amazon five
Speaker 4: point eight million dollars for privacy violations and accused Rain
Speaker 4: employees of quote illegally surveilling end quote customers. But that's
Speaker 4: right in line with the Amazon family because the FDC
Speaker 4: also charged to Amazon twenty five million dollars in twenty
Speaker 4: twenty three for violating children's privacy laws by keeping recordings
Speaker 4: produced with Alexa. Off returned in twenty twenty five years
Speaker 4: later as Ring's chief inventor. He's the one who recently
Speaker 4: made many of the partnerships with law enforcement agencies. Ring's
Speaker 4: journey started from humble beginnings before it was even known
Speaker 4: as Rain, and managed to manufacture itself an image of
Speaker 4: an underdog, partly in thanks to what it was called Doorbot,
Speaker 4: and when Simonov unsuccessfully pitched the product on the investment
Speaker 4: show Shark Tank, I.
Speaker 1: Just don't see the progression, and for that reason, I'm
Speaker 1: not I'm wrestling with where this goes in the market.
Speaker 4: All of the Shark investors passed on it, except for
Speaker 4: Kevin O'Leary aka Mister Wonderful, who like a knockoff veto,
Speaker 4: gave Simon Off an offer he had to refuse.
Speaker 7: I'll give you seven hundred thousand dollars. I want a
Speaker 7: ten percent royalty that drops down to seven after I
Speaker 7: recoup the seven hundred thousand, and I get five percent
Speaker 7: of the company's equity today.
Speaker 4: Fast forward to twenty eighteen, Amazon purchased the company for
Speaker 4: one point one five billion dollars. It would also be
Speaker 4: the second largest acquisition Amazon made at the time, but
Speaker 4: it would be the giant etailer's first writs of power
Speaker 4: to work toward its other reign of power, the eye
Speaker 4: of Bezos. Soon Off recently reflected on that moment.
Speaker 6: And I left there without money that I truly needed
Speaker 6: at the time, I left there like in shambles.
Speaker 4: I was in tears when I left. On May thirty first,
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three, the FTC concluded that rin Quote illegally
Speaker 4: surveiled customers end quote, end quote failed to stop hackers
Speaker 4: from taking control of users cameras end quote. The FTC
Speaker 4: ordered the company to pay users five point eight million dollars.
Speaker 4: As a result, the FTC road quote rinn deceived its
Speaker 4: customers by failing to restrict employees and contractors' access to
Speaker 4: its customers videos, using customer videos to train algorithms, among
Speaker 4: other purposes, without consent, and failing to implement security save
Speaker 4: guards end quote. In what is basically the worst privacy
Speaker 4: nightmare for a lot of people. The FTC continued quote
Speaker 4: one employee over several months viewed thousands of video recordings
Speaker 4: belonging to female users of Rain cameras that surveiled intimate
Speaker 4: spaces in their home, such as their bathrooms or bedrooms.
Speaker 4: End quote. Perhaps more worrying is that RINN wasn't able
Speaker 4: to deduce how widespread this misconduct was within the company because,
Speaker 4: as the FTC put it, quote, Ring failed to implement
Speaker 4: basic measures to monitor and attacked employees' video access end quote.
Speaker 4: The Commission also accused RIN of failing to quote implement
Speaker 4: standard security measures to protect customers information from two well
Speaker 4: known online threats, credential stuffing and broof force attacks end quote,
Speaker 4: despite credential stuffing attacks that had already occurred in twenty
Speaker 4: seventeen and twenty eighteen. Rain shortcomings year led to attackers
Speaker 4: getting access to fifty five thousand Ring users quote stored videos,
Speaker 4: live video streams, and account profiles. End quote. In a
Speaker 4: particular instance of abuse as results, the FTC wrote that
Speaker 4: hackers quote taunted several children with racist slurs, propositioned individuals,
Speaker 4: and threatened a family with physical harm if they didn't
Speaker 4: pay a ransom. End quote. Then acting Director of the
Speaker 4: FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection Samuel Levine stated at the time,
Speaker 4: quote Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to
Speaker 4: spine and harassment. End quote. Fortunately that's all in the past,
Speaker 4: and Rain owned up to the bacle with transport.
Speaker 1: So I can't So apparently I can't. What now this
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense because I never had to use
Speaker 1: this before. There's something criss crossing and obs and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to update it to the newer roun to
Speaker 1: have it fuck up even more. But it's making me
Speaker 1: mute the actual audio mixer audio input capture. Hold on,
Speaker 1: i gotta make sure I'm not doubling out Hello, Hello, Okay.
Speaker 8: I'm not.
Speaker 1: So this is all screwed up, this echoing effect. I
Speaker 1: have to literally so I have to slide my bar
Speaker 1: the fuck up. I have to unmute myself and have
Speaker 1: to be and the right fucking pat what So I
Speaker 1: have to be on two fucking patents at the same
Speaker 1: time because I have to have the obs up to
Speaker 1: unfucking mute it. So I have to beat in the
Speaker 1: wrong thing where I can't pause the video because I'm
Speaker 1: not on the fucking video page. I'm in a fucking
Speaker 1: obs studio and I have to go to the other tab,
Speaker 1: go up into that, and then I can put this
Speaker 1: isn't navigation. This is fucking cocksucking bullshit. So otherwise I
Speaker 1: have a I have an echo. Either that or I
Speaker 1: don't fucking talk throughout the video. This is fucking bullshit.
Speaker 1: This has never happened before.
Speaker 4: I'm just kidding. You didn't any wrong. On Saturday nine,
Speaker 4: Motto I Think It's rather than A reported that by
Speaker 4: analyzing the network traffic of ritn's neighbors and app, they
Speaker 4: discovered a technical oversight and how data was transmitted. This
Speaker 4: traffic contained quote hidden geographic coordinates with up to six
Speaker 4: testimal points of precision end quote, a level of detail
Speaker 4: the publication noted was quote accurate enough to pinpoint roughly
Speaker 4: a square inch of ground end quote. To verify the
Speaker 4: scale of this exposure, gizmoto cross referenced its findings with
Speaker 4: a PhD student at MIT who had mapped every rain
Speaker 4: video shared on the app since twenty seventeen. A few
Speaker 4: days later, on December nineteenth, twenty nineteen, TechCrunch reported that
Speaker 4: a security researcher had quote found on the dark web
Speaker 4: one five hundred and sixty two unique email addresses and
Speaker 4: passwords associated with Rain doorbell passwords unquote, which could be
Speaker 4: used to log into and view from the cameras. The
Speaker 4: publication added quote. The researcher reported the findings to Amazon,
Speaker 4: which owns the Rain brand, but Amazon asked that the
Speaker 4: researcher not discussed their findings publicly. End quote. In January
Speaker 4: twenty twenty one, tech Crunch reported that a quote security
Speaker 4: flaw in Rain's Neighbors app was exposing the precise locations
Speaker 4: and home addresses of users who had posted to the app.
Speaker 4: End quote that sounds familiar. Roughly two weeks before the
Speaker 4: FTC sued Rain. In twenty twenty three, founder Simonov left
Speaker 4: the company, and in his stead, Liz Hammren stepped in
Speaker 4: as the new CEO and also the new chief I'm
Speaker 4: getting sued now officer. Hopefully she's more privacy minded. This
Speaker 4: Hammern steps in as the new Discord COO. Mother Hammeron
Speaker 4: served as Discords Chief operating officer from twenty twenty one
Speaker 4: up until she became the CEO of RINN in March
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three. Semenov wouldn't be gone long, however, and
Speaker 4: returned to his precious in twenty twenty five, here's a
Speaker 4: clip of him taking up the mantle to become the
Speaker 4: company's CEO again. This time, he's back with a renewed
Speaker 4: interest in AI. In a company post, Simonov wrote, quote,
Speaker 4: the AI transformation happening right now is a once in
Speaker 4: a generation opportunity, and I think we're super well positioned
Speaker 4: with helpful and practical AI features like smart video search.
Speaker 4: It's just a start here with scratching the service of
Speaker 4: what we can do with AI. End quote. That leads
Speaker 4: us to where we are today and the bulk of
Speaker 4: our research for this piece, which is Ring's expansion into
Speaker 4: the AI world, and in particular, in addition to its
Speaker 4: AI powered church party functionality, its rapid expansion into law
Speaker 4: enforcement partnership. On January twenty fourth, twenty twenty four, Consumer
Speaker 4: Reports wrote that Ring quote with over twenty five hundred
Speaker 4: local law enforcement agencies end quote. This is particularly concerning
Speaker 4: when you consider that there's an estimated ten million Ring
Speaker 4: cameras in the US. As part of its partnership, Ring
Speaker 4: expands on its creepy past by adding a creepy future.
Speaker 4: It gives away Ring cameras to law enforcement agencies to
Speaker 4: then be distributed into the community like some kind of honeypot.
Speaker 4: It's one thing if the government's going to openly surveil
Speaker 4: citizens with cameras on public property in public places. It's
Speaker 4: another if they're like, here's a camera to put in
Speaker 4: your home. I mean, this is like, let's just take
Speaker 4: this a step further. Let's just say that law enforcement
Speaker 4: agencies start giving out air tags, GPS trackers that they've
Speaker 4: also registered to their devices for you to put on
Speaker 4: your car and your backpack, well in your laptop like that.
Speaker 4: I don't understand how anyone could be handed that's a
Speaker 4: cloud connected security device by a law enforcement officer of
Speaker 4: any agency and not feel uncomfortable about it. In a
Speaker 4: story titled quote Amazon's helping police build a surveillance network
Speaker 4: with ring door bells end quote see net and hold
Speaker 4: her to most literal title possible award reported quote in Hampton, Virginia,
Speaker 4: police received.
Speaker 1: Okay, so maybe that's working better. I still have to
Speaker 1: hear the audio.
Speaker 4: On your car possible award, Virginia.
Speaker 1: Okay, so maybe that's working better. All right, Yeah, I
Speaker 1: guess that's it. I have to kill the desktop. Why
Speaker 1: does that make It doesn't make fucking sense. But here
Speaker 1: we are. It's working without the echo.
Speaker 4: Fifty to three ring cameras. After partnering with the company
Speaker 4: in March, the police department is still figuring out what
Speaker 4: neighborhoods they're going to distribute those cameras to. End quote.
Speaker 4: We're sure they can profile one soon enough. Police could
Speaker 4: then request video evidence from ring cameras via the device's
Speaker 4: Neighbors app, with seene out reporting that they didn't need
Speaker 4: to provide details for why they're requesting those clips. This
Speaker 4: allowed law enforcement to jump through a legal loophole. As
Speaker 4: the publication explained, quote, multiple cities have laws requiring a
Speaker 4: public process to debate how police use and buy surveillance technology.
Speaker 4: But when police and Amazon convinced private residents to buy
Speaker 4: these cameras, it's essentially circumventing that process end quote.
Speaker 1: As for the free cameras, yeah, I don't know if
Speaker 1: you got to that point yet because I've been dicking
Speaker 1: around with this problem. But he's going to if he
Speaker 1: hasn't already that even if you don't have a Flock
Speaker 1: camera or ring doorbell camera, it doesn't really freaking matter.
Speaker 1: Flock offers the third party service of handling the data,
Speaker 1: and so you're shitbird off brand whatever camera or maybe
Speaker 1: not so much off brand even maybe they just don't
Speaker 1: how their own servers or whatever will outsource too flock
Speaker 1: and all that gets funneled then to pallenteer, your local
Speaker 1: law enforcement, state law enforcement, Satan, the Jews, everyone else
Speaker 1: who hates you, your girlfriend in high school, who wants
Speaker 1: you dead, all those things.
Speaker 4: Giving out by the cops. I guess they're just learning
Speaker 4: from the drug lords they bust the first ones for free.
Speaker 4: Associate professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Eric
Speaker 4: Pisa explained an emerging conflict of interest as a result
Speaker 4: of this partnership. Quote. As policing becomes more technology driven,
Speaker 4: we have this new issue of police acting in the
Speaker 4: interest of commercial enterprises end quote. And we've heard that
Speaker 4: before somehow, Darius Khan from the UK, from our recent
Speaker 4: investigation into Sega, cooperating with the City of London police,
Speaker 4: who we felt were operating on the behalf of Sega,
Speaker 4: had a perfect quote to describe the situation.
Speaker 2: If that is not an example of state power of
Speaker 2: intrusion being delegated to two private companies, I don't know
Speaker 2: what is.
Speaker 4: Back in twenty nineteen, then Bloomfield Police Department Detective Bureau
Speaker 4: Commander Captain Vincent Kearney explained that the proliferation of ring
Speaker 4: cameras has widely expanded law enforcements. Eyes and ears stayed
Speaker 4: in quote there's probably ten times as many ring cameras
Speaker 4: as we have anything else. End quote. A CLU of
Speaker 4: Southern California staff attorney Mohammed Tazar reflected on Ring's partnership
Speaker 4: with law enforcement and said, quote, what we have here
Speaker 4: is a perfect marriage between law enforcement and one of
Speaker 4: the world's biggest companies, creating conditions for a society that
Speaker 4: few people would want to be a part of. Quote.
Speaker 4: The good news is that, due to privacy criticisms the company.
Speaker 1: You're going to parade or second here, I'm gonna try something.
Speaker 1: Fucking played.
Speaker 4: Second here, try something.
Speaker 1: Everything sounds like it's coming out.
Speaker 4: Pause law enforcement's ability to request video evidence from ring
Speaker 4: cameras in early twenty twenty four. The bad news is
Speaker 4: that on April twenty second, twenty twenty five, Rain essentially
Speaker 4: brought the feature back when it partnered with Axon. In
Speaker 4: its press release, Axon wrote, quote, the integration gives Ring
Speaker 4: customers the choice to securely and privately share video footage
Speaker 4: with investigators in active cases, when a crime occurs, law
Speaker 4: enforcement defines a GEO fenced area and timeframe. That request
Speaker 4: is sent to ring customers, who can then choose whether
Speaker 4: to share relevant footage. End quote. Axon is a controversial
Speaker 4: company for a lot of reasons. When it got its start,
Speaker 4: it was known as Taser International, which was known for
Speaker 4: selling tasers. Obviously that itself isn't a problem, but the
Speaker 4: company was developing a Taser drone in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Which I want one. I want an air gun drone too,
Speaker 1: just a little head into the next delivering just the
Speaker 1: right amount of poison. You know what I mean, Yeah, poison,
Speaker 1: aero frog, all the oyvas hmmm.
Speaker 4: According to NPR, was so hated that it caused nine
Speaker 4: members of its own AI.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not gonna worry about curious jowel. Those
Speaker 1: people are worthless and pointless. Yes, they are sucking way
Speaker 1: tax money. But getting rid of the power structure with
Speaker 1: air gun drones, dark gun, lowgun.
Speaker 4: I mean, that'd be cool to resign over concerns that
Speaker 4: it would be quote weaponizing drones in over police communities
Speaker 4: of color.
Speaker 1: End quote, Oh fuck that, that's a good thing. Fucking
Speaker 1: tasers hailing from the sky raining down tasers. Except they
Speaker 1: won't just use it obviously with that type of statement,
Speaker 1: They're not going to use it on the people who
Speaker 1: deserve it anyway. They're gonna make a geo fencing network
Speaker 1: of like basically electrical wire so they keeps us cows
Speaker 1: in from going over the fence.
Speaker 8: Was on.
Speaker 4: The Ethics Board reportedly stated that they had quote lost
Speaker 4: faith in Axon's ability to be a responsible partner end quote.
Speaker 4: But Axon emphasizes the important part of its culture, cult
Speaker 4: net cult is the important part of culture. Important encouraged
Speaker 4: to tasee themselves or get company logos tattooed on themselves
Speaker 4: as a measure of commitment what Axon also has multiple partnerships,
Speaker 4: like with ICE and CBP. The New York based The
Speaker 4: Newsroom documented reported quote At the federal level, Axon executives
Speaker 4: lobbied for a slice of the Trump administration sixty four
Speaker 4: billion dollars of DHS spending, and the company now holds
Speaker 4: multi year contracts with the agencies including ICE and U,
Speaker 4: Customs and Border Protection end quote. In September twenty twenty five,
Speaker 4: leveraging its partnership with ax On, ring launched its Community
Speaker 4: Requests feature, which the company presented as quote a new
Speaker 4: way to help your community end quote. With the tool
Speaker 4: rings On, customers can report an incident and provide a
Speaker 4: specific time and location of the event and rings of
Speaker 4: a feather, flock together, or something. Following month, on October sixteenth,
Speaker 4: twenty twenty five, re announce its partnership with video surveillance
Speaker 4: company Flock, which is another company that's no stranger to controversy.
Speaker 4: The a CLU writes that Flock is quote building a
Speaker 4: dangerous nationwide masterveillent acy.
Speaker 1: You saying that fuck structure end.
Speaker 4: Quote, and regardless of what civil liberty groups say on
Speaker 4: its own blog.
Speaker 1: That's just that's that. That's just that that that faults.
Speaker 1: Uh oh, don't do that. That would be really bad.
Speaker 1: Please don't do that. As they pull you through the door,
Speaker 1: no no, don't don't come in, pull you through the
Speaker 1: door more. Stay back you as a.
Speaker 4: Greg we're excited to announce the expansion of community requests
Speaker 4: to local public safety agencies using Block Safety's Nova platform
Speaker 4: or flock os. Flock Nova and flock os are secure
Speaker 4: platforms designed to assist public safety agencies and their evidence
Speaker 4: collection and investigative work. End quote. We look forward to
Speaker 4: learning about them at their university. Flock you.
Speaker 3: Flock you scan vehicle license plates and.
Speaker 4: Are able to identify the make and model of cars,
Speaker 4: with some of them reportedly able to identify what the
Speaker 4: drivers look like while driving them. You could also even
Speaker 4: identify so on buy their car looks maybe there's a
Speaker 4: lot of a pond, a civic, certain year on the road.
Speaker 4: If the car has certain bumper stickers, you might be
Speaker 4: able to identify what their political leanings are, what places
Speaker 4: they frequent, and build a profile on who that person is.
Speaker 4: Like Axon flocks tech has also aided ICE, and it's massive.
Speaker 1: This person's a whore surveillance.
Speaker 4: Network to lay the groundwork for a potential police state.
Speaker 4: As we've said before, the only real difference between a
Speaker 4: nation implemented surveillance apparatus like for example, China is constantly
Speaker 4: discussed for the one that we're starting to see in
Speaker 4: the US is who's implementing it.
Speaker 1: And in this case five Bucks say he's a Slayer fan.
Speaker 4: But companies it almost seems we're sinister. It's easier for
Speaker 4: them to squirm away from things. They can nest their
Speaker 4: partnerships within other companies to kind of hide just how
Speaker 4: bad it is, like we're talking about here, and ultimately
Speaker 4: the government is still getting access to it anyway. It's
Speaker 4: just done through this veil of commerce and private companies
Speaker 4: where they're selling you security, just like a country would
Speaker 4: sell you a security when it implements the surveillance apparatus.
Speaker 4: It's just this time. You don't know how many places
Speaker 4: that's being bought and sold as data packages to other companies.
Speaker 4: This can be used for things that are still evil
Speaker 4: but are maybe less obviously evil.
Speaker 1: It isn't that nice too, Like, No, your guarantees that
Speaker 1: we wouldn't do this stopped with us, not the people
Speaker 1: that we sold your information to already. H you don't
Speaker 1: have any agreements with them, and those people are governmental
Speaker 1: quote unquote governmental. Oh yeah, yeah, no, we don't worry
Speaker 1: about us doing that. It's pretty much the same thing.
Speaker 1: But the guys that we gave all ther information too,
Speaker 1: they're gonna do that to you. Yeah, those guys Palatier, for.
Speaker 4: Example, looking at the address that's registered for your ring camera,
Speaker 4: looking at what kind of car you drive, looking at
Speaker 4: what neighborhood your house is in and what it might
Speaker 4: be worth, or just the address to know what it's worth.
Speaker 4: Any of these things theoretically feasibly could be used to
Speaker 4: identify your level of wealth, and as we've said in
Speaker 4: the past, it could be used for algorithmic pricing, which
Speaker 4: is already being rolled out in some actual grocery chains
Speaker 4: in the US, to determine how much you're willing to
Speaker 4: pay before you no longer are willing to pay more?
Speaker 1: Isn't that fucked up? Hold on second, how could that
Speaker 1: be legal? Oh? I guess people here saying what the
Speaker 1: flocks up? Says Thomas E. Edwayer A little a snack
Speaker 1: bar from it, Edward Snowman, Edward Snowman uh burn before
Speaker 1: reading that's funny, Yes, exactly exactly. This is this is
Speaker 1: the that's it right there, That's everything you need to know,
Speaker 1: all created by the same asshole in the middle. He
Speaker 1: was like, Jesus, wasn't you That's not what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I'm saying they built this. It's not city, but this
Speaker 1: church on fucking juice. Yeah, there you go. That would
Speaker 1: be cool if if Teaser would make yamaka seeking drones.
Speaker 1: Ah yes, that's funny. Thank you for being a producer again.
Speaker 1: Edward snowman, Uh, that is awesome. Okay, we're so trash
Speaker 1: talking ash. Nugget over here says, how are people this
Speaker 1: because this is the person just who just came in,
Speaker 1: came came out of nowhere and decided started talking to
Speaker 1: shit to people just because we're playing information. We're talking
Speaker 1: about the dispopian digital cheka being implemented into the world.
Speaker 1: This person, of course with the oh yeah, I'm smarter
Speaker 1: than everybody else and if you're just talking about it,
Speaker 1: you must be a fucking retard. Really, or is it
Speaker 1: more evidence that we're aware that this is a problem?
Speaker 1: He says, how are people so stupid that they don't
Speaker 1: know they are of course going to be spied on
Speaker 1: with these high tech devices and cameras a bitch of
Speaker 1: the fagot has a fucking cell phone right next to
Speaker 1: him while he says this too, he says, like, hello,
Speaker 1: is anybody in there? Just not if you could hear
Speaker 1: him me? Is he ready bulling home? And I go, hey,
Speaker 1: fuck you, fag And I dropped him. Now he's gone.
Speaker 1: Now he's gone and lost forever. It's wrong timing dude,
Speaker 1: midtle fucking solving a problem here, cock sucond ass has
Speaker 1: problem here? Want to be somebody out now, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Still you're an asshole, though, don't people ledger it a
Speaker 1: right back to it? Yeah, let's let's see what the
Speaker 1: fuck is happening now? And we also the other day
Speaker 1: we looked at this thing. How exactly does remotely spying
Speaker 1: on kids practicing gymnastics make them safer? And it's only
Speaker 1: two minutes long. I'm going to readdress that right after
Speaker 1: right after this, and then I probably believe. But then
Speaker 1: we have a couple, we have actually three that are
Speaker 1: pretty it's important here and they're from uh why is
Speaker 1: there only two up here showing the one why are
Speaker 1: you feeding Palenteer feeding the Palenter database? And there's the
Speaker 1: other one Skynet moment How mythos Ai just changed cybersecurity forever?
Speaker 1: Those two were pretty damn important, but we're not going
Speaker 1: to get to them until after I get back.
Speaker 4: And it just it suppresses everyone financially to the point
Speaker 4: just below. They would break to extract the most money
Speaker 4: out of them. All of this stuff is valuable.
Speaker 1: Yeah, how is that lawful or legal? The price is
Speaker 1: the price. It's not, Oh, this person needs this, the
Speaker 1: more dependent on it, so we get to raise the prices.
Speaker 1: Who the fuck that's Jewish, By the way, that is
Speaker 1: the most Jewish practice I have ever fucking heard of
Speaker 1: in my life. This is why they called them merchants,
Speaker 1: cut those and bandits, thiefs on the road. This is
Speaker 1: why they called them that, the habaro sagas. That's how
Speaker 1: they got their names. Hebrew is not it's not a
Speaker 1: positive name. The haberm shah gas where the cutthroats and bandits,
Speaker 1: the thieves on the road, the people from the other
Speaker 1: side of the tracks, essentially, But they called them the
Speaker 1: other side of the river, which I'm guessing is the
Speaker 1: tigers and euphrates. I don't know, but they are not like, oh,
Speaker 1: where the real Hebrews. Then you don't want to be
Speaker 1: known that as that you're the real fucking bandits, cutthroats
Speaker 1: and thieves and pieces of shit. No, you don't want
Speaker 1: to be called that. Why would you want to be
Speaker 1: called that? It doesn't make any sense. Stop talking about that,
Speaker 1: you know. And no, no, that wasn't their language. That
Speaker 1: wasn't the language of thieves. But Hebrew was a bastardization
Speaker 1: of something that was a Gothic area in fucking alphabet.
Speaker 1: So it's all second rate, third rate bullshit, and then
Speaker 1: it felt it had died out. They had to make
Speaker 1: it all up again in the eighteen fifties. Out of Yiddish.
Speaker 1: Another criminal, another lying criminal, cheats language. It's not high German,
Speaker 1: it's fucking Yiddish. So uh yeah, anyway, how the hell
Speaker 1: would you want how the hell would you be allowed
Speaker 1: to tell one person's let's say I buy lots of
Speaker 1: hot sauce, so you're gonna jack up the rates on
Speaker 1: hot sauce my Amazon cart because you know I buy
Speaker 1: it regularly. That's enough that to get a pen in
Speaker 1: the neck, don't you think, like if I if there
Speaker 1: was a physical being doing that, like the in a
Speaker 1: situation where drew in And this is why I don't
Speaker 1: understand how they didn't. I'll get their heads or hands
Speaker 1: cut off already, like when things were a little bit
Speaker 1: more direct and you were able to exact justice on
Speaker 1: the spot. How did these merchants? Were they that slick
Speaker 1: that people didn't figure this out? They didn't talk to
Speaker 1: their name and be like how much did he sell
Speaker 1: you that app before? Really? Because he sold me for
Speaker 1: double and then next thing you know, there's a little
Speaker 1: and stuck in the motherfucker's neck, the skinny, little faggot
Speaker 1: bitch neck. That's how it should go, That's the how
Speaker 1: that practice should end. Or better yet, use them as
Speaker 1: decorations and let them hang high and slide down the
Speaker 1: post's beautiful decoration. People can see it from miles. It
Speaker 1: smells too after a while, especially when they're intestines jump out,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, like something something that shows
Speaker 1: other people that that's not allowed to hear, and we don't.
Speaker 1: We don't appreciate or tolerate it's calm. Instead, we just
Speaker 1: handed it over our kingdom to them, because capitalistic pieces
Speaker 1: of shit in this country open the gates for them.
Speaker 1: Yeah great, we can fix that by uh making some ornaments.
Speaker 1: That's all I'm saying, lots of ornaments stable and evil.
Speaker 1: Just wait a second, am I clipping out?
Speaker 8: Hey?
Speaker 1: Uh? Into chat? Tell me if my voice is steady
Speaker 1: or if it sounds different now that I've done what
Speaker 1: I did, and if I need to change back, because
Speaker 1: it's going to sound perfect because I'm only hearing what
Speaker 1: the roadcaster is processing, not what it's putting.
Speaker 8: Out.
Speaker 1: So that's the fucking problem there. I'm not actually hearing
Speaker 1: what you guys are hearing. That's why I know. I
Speaker 1: didn't know that there was an echo until I pulled
Speaker 1: out my and noticed it.
Speaker 4: Ways, it affects different people. So these are some of
Speaker 4: the theoretical use cases for this data. Oregon Senator Ron
Speaker 4: Wyden investigative flock, and in a letter to the company,
Speaker 4: wrote quote, I conducted further oversight and have determined.
Speaker 1: That flock effect. His last name is Langley, mister Garrett
Speaker 1: Langley alone, that alone, it's like, all right, let's uh
Speaker 1: let it matchine walk away from this dude.
Speaker 4: Up to its commitment to protect the privacy and security
Speaker 4: of Oregon In's abuse of flock cameras is inevitable.
Speaker 1: And I've actually caught it. By the way, I've actually
Speaker 1: caught Amazon doing this to me. When I use somebody
Speaker 1: else's phone in a different account to look up the
Speaker 1: prices of something, they were different than when I went
Speaker 1: to my Amazon account, and they were more on my account.
Speaker 1: When you first start buying things, it's like the first
Speaker 1: one's cheap. At least it's not free, but the first
Speaker 1: one's cheap, Like drugs right first ones, you know, and
Speaker 1: then and then as you buy it more, Uh, they
Speaker 1: jack up the price. Fuck those people. That should be
Speaker 1: something that there should be. No, there's no there's no trial,
Speaker 1: there's no there's no court hearing, there's no lawsuit. There's
Speaker 1: just somebody being dragged out of an office somewhere and
Speaker 1: maybe throwing if they're a high enough building, tossed through
Speaker 1: the breakaway glass. So you have to break the glass,
Speaker 1: you know, the glass that doesn't break, because they don't
Speaker 1: want you to jumping out like the like they did
Speaker 1: in the Wall Street crash, people running and jumping out
Speaker 1: the windows. They made ones that don't break. If you
Speaker 1: you can't toss them from there, then you drag them
Speaker 1: out into the courtyard and you harry carry their asses
Speaker 1: right there. But you don't. You don't allow that to happen.
Speaker 1: That's like worse than being a horse thief. You're being
Speaker 1: that deceitful. That is very dirty, bad business. And if
Speaker 1: that can't be allowed just because they got away with it,
Speaker 1: just because you accepted the offer. No, the price is
Speaker 1: the price is the price is the price. Some people
Speaker 1: can afford it, some people can't something. Some people pass
Speaker 1: on that price. Some people won't you offer discounts if
Speaker 1: you want to make it different prices, but you don't
Speaker 1: fucking just say, oh, well, this guy seems like he
Speaker 1: really needs this item, so instead of it being seventeen
Speaker 1: dollars for him, make it twenty five. Fuck that.
Speaker 4: Made it clear. It takes no responsibility to prevent or
Speaker 4: detect that end quote. According to Widen, law enforcement members
Speaker 4: could use flock to quote search data collected through their
Speaker 4: cameras end quote. And even though Rain and Flock have
Speaker 4: both emphasized working to support local public safety officers, coupled
Speaker 4: with the fact that flock says it does not work
Speaker 4: with ICE, wide unrevealed that federal agent's spined on local
Speaker 4: law enforcement to use flocks capabilities to track down migrants,
Speaker 4: with the senator writing quote, local law enforcement ran searches
Speaker 4: at the request of federal agents again for immigration related purposes.
Speaker 4: End quote. And as a reminder again, ICE has repeatedly
Speaker 4: arrested legal immigrants, it's arrested Green.
Speaker 1: Card holders too cold.
Speaker 4: Too cold since ICE has also taunted protesters with their
Speaker 4: addition to databases.
Speaker 1: All right, stop collaborate and listen.
Speaker 4: Their designation as domestic terrorists.
Speaker 1: Because we have a nice little database. Oh good, you're
Speaker 1: consider domestic terrorists. So this is not something cool. Somebody
Speaker 1: just called me a domestic terrorist, which threatens my life basically,
Speaker 1: so I get to shoot them in the face before
Speaker 1: they shoot, before they take me in the custody. No thanks,
Speaker 1: you just you said when you said you're a domestic
Speaker 1: we have a database that says you're a domesticurist. They'd said, punteer.
Speaker 1: Once you did, so, you'd see how fast you can draw. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's how you handle it.
Speaker 4: And used exclusively for stopping the worst of the worst.
Speaker 4: That's just how they sell it to you to ease
Speaker 4: the acceptance, urging people to get the flock out wide,
Speaker 4: and concluded his letter writing quote, in my view, local
Speaker 4: elected officials can best protect their constituents from the inevitable
Speaker 4: abuses of flock cameras by removing Flock from their communities
Speaker 4: end quote. While it doesn't taste its employees like Axon
Speaker 4: done that, we know of one shocking thing about Flock.
Speaker 1: Shocking.
Speaker 4: One of its founders includes the founder's fund, which leads
Speaker 4: the question who funds the founder's fund? Founding the founders?
Speaker 4: Is it the founders?
Speaker 1: Founder founders.
Speaker 4: We found out Jeffrey Apstin Pewter Teel in case you're
Speaker 4: not familiar with him. Teal is a multi billionaire and
Speaker 4: it's considered the don of the PayPal mafia, which represents
Speaker 4: a group of elite tech investors. So we found the
Speaker 4: Founder's Fund, Founders Founders founder, and he has Penda blog
Speaker 4: posts saying quote, I no longer believe freedom and democracy
Speaker 4: are compatible. And he also infamously paused for a really, really.
Speaker 3: You would prefer the human race to endure?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, what are we talking here, like borgs. It's
Speaker 1: like there's some there's some meat on the computer based
Speaker 1: system that's driving the whole life form or what we're
Speaker 1: talking like people, people, those smelly things.
Speaker 3: I mean, yes, you're hesitating. Well, yes, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I would, I would.
Speaker 3: This is a long imitations, so long hesitation. There's so
Speaker 3: many questions in play. Wouldn't the human race survive?
Speaker 1: That's a counterplast question to a Jew who's also taken
Speaker 1: in the ass and and and and uh prefers it
Speaker 1: that way. So it's a little bit different for me.
Speaker 1: You see, we're on the street.
Speaker 4: Is also if you say, Peter tal three times fast,
Speaker 4: the Antichrist appears, Peter tal don't do it, Peter T.
Speaker 4: Peter Teale.
Speaker 7: I love the idea of getting a drone and having
Speaker 7: light fentanyl laced urine spraying on analysts who tried to
Speaker 7: screw us.
Speaker 1: Hey, what do they all have in common? Except for
Speaker 1: the Asian guy, which I don't I'm not understanding. Sure
Speaker 1: I'm that one, but uh they both looked very gay
Speaker 1: in this picture. But yes, uh carp teal open the
Speaker 1: eyes open and rear end.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: Sam waltonan whatever the fuck is Altman? Not Waltman? I
Speaker 1: mix them up with Sam Sam Walton?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, they all have none of them making noise
Speaker 1: when they fart.
Speaker 8: Is it?
Speaker 1: Isn't it something? Yeah?
Speaker 4: So behind on Nvidia partner Palenteer, which.
Speaker 1: Our product is used on occasion to kill people.
Speaker 4: And which Nvidia says we were.
Speaker 1: He's in Not not often enough though, because they're still Gilliam.
Speaker 8: With Pellenteer to accelerate everything Pellateer does well.
Speaker 4: Promoting his new book, Dan Down chief Dana Lane, Simonov
Speaker 4: pushed the new search party Dingleberry. In October twenty twenty five,
Speaker 4: Simonov told the Verge that the company aims to quote
Speaker 4: make neighborhoods safer. End quote. The CEO believes that ring
Speaker 4: cameras coupled with AI will be able to get quote
Speaker 4: very close to zero out crime as long as you're
Speaker 4: only counting crimes committed by non billionaires. That is speaking
Speaker 4: to the publication. He shared his timeline for this vision. Quote,
Speaker 4: I don't think it's ten years away. That's in twelve
Speaker 4: to twenty four months, maybe even within a year end quote.
Speaker 4: Now this was published in October of twenty twenty five,
Speaker 4: so it's been almost half a year. They're about halfway
Speaker 4: too that twelve month goal of zero crime.
Speaker 1: Thought. I was almost about to play you if you
Speaker 1: don't like what you see here, get the walkout. I
Speaker 1: was gonna change it instead of funk. But that extreme
Speaker 1: video is extremely homosexual. Wow, never mind, I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: throw up now instead through.
Speaker 4: A ding Dawn acted like a ding bat when he
Speaker 4: Dawn played the risk that his vision imposed for privacy. Quote.
Speaker 4: When you look at these quote controversies, what's sad about
Speaker 4: it is it's just misinformation. They're not controversies. Police asking
Speaker 4: people and honestly for their video is not a controversy.
Speaker 4: Famous last words because next ring debut it's highly controversial
Speaker 4: Super Bowl commercial for its search party feature.
Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, during twenty sixteen to Pout
Speaker 1: eighteen giving around that time, remember that guy Corey Booker.
Speaker 1: Remember that time he was on I don't know what
Speaker 1: social media it was. He was driving around some neighborhood
Speaker 1: and he was actually driving his own career, surprisingly, and
Speaker 1: he was talking about very cryptically lost dog. Gotta find
Speaker 1: that lost dog in the neighborhood, driving around real slow
Speaker 1: looking for that lost dog. I think a child escaped.
Speaker 1: I think that's a fucking code. By the way, I'll
Speaker 1: find your lost dogs. They're not talking to you, they're
Speaker 1: talking to the fucking discussing child killers. They'll find your
Speaker 1: lost dog, all right. Don't worry. They won't make it
Speaker 1: to the police. We got amber alerts that actually attack
Speaker 1: the parents because we tell them that somebody's abducting a child,
Speaker 1: and you know, the Karens out there going they turn
Speaker 1: in the parents that are trying to rescue their children
Speaker 1: from fucking foster abuse and torture, and those parents got
Speaker 1: thrown into jail. Yeah. Yeah, the whole system is a
Speaker 1: bunch of child predators. Even the ones that are pretending
Speaker 1: that they're protecting you. The CPS thing. Um, there's two two.
Speaker 1: There's two things, the gun violations and child theft from
Speaker 1: kidnapping approved by the government. Kidnappings is how they balance
Speaker 1: their budget. The adoption and say family exact in nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety seven. I've gone over this long before there was
Speaker 1: a Stu Peter's freaking video about it or documentary. An
Speaker 1: motherfucker should be actually asking me because I actually also
Speaker 1: interviewed Diego Rodriguez, whose grandson was baby Cyrus, who they
Speaker 1: did this to, who's also in that documentary was Stu,
Speaker 1: and I actually had him back on my show when
Speaker 1: Marissa was having problems with Cyrus his health still, and
Speaker 1: I got her connected with doctor artists at the time
Speaker 1: who was helpful to an extent who been It wouldn't
Speaker 1: have been like if I had doctor Good and doctor
Speaker 1: Manso on there, the problems would have been solved like that.
Speaker 1: But I tried. I did my best to try to
Speaker 1: help him, and you know what, I got a snooty
Speaker 1: elitist attitude from Marissa, and like, the fuck is what
Speaker 1: is that?
Speaker 7: You know?
Speaker 1: Like I like invinted your whole family on to try
Speaker 1: to get you connected with two different doctors that day.
Speaker 1: One was two chiropractors, one one uh practicing in one retired,
Speaker 1: and they were all that what they call that thing
Speaker 1: where their full body da da da da dad. So
Speaker 1: it was a little bit of a okay, count you
Speaker 1: know type of moment, like soon they wonder people. Then
Speaker 1: people shouldn't care when you when you're int the need
Speaker 1: of help. But at least I got into the Nancy
Speaker 1: Schaeffer stuff. George. I think she was a Georgia senator
Speaker 1: and they found her dead and her husban been and
Speaker 1: she was speaking out against CPS and the Clintons, the
Speaker 1: whole Haiti debacle, the trick out, the little bitch's name whatever,
Speaker 1: let's see alert sense. Who's that cunt? I forgot her name.
Speaker 1: She's someone that was in the Haiti thing. But anyway,
Speaker 1: I went through this whole, all the stuff. I was
Speaker 1: still on Revolution Radio when I was doing all this.
Speaker 1: Let's put it this way. I broadcasted my first interview
Speaker 1: with Diego on a Greeny not as developed as it
Speaker 1: is now. Before it was it was never it wasn't
Speaker 1: even f Gjay, it was it was Joshu TV's jitsy
Speaker 1: and I broadcasted it from there instead it from like,
Speaker 1: you know, obs to rubble or whatever, because that wasn't
Speaker 1: the thing yet.
Speaker 4: The thirty second ad tried to manipulate the hearts by
Speaker 4: showing a little girl crying as she and her father
Speaker 4: put up pictures of their lost dog around the neighborhood.
Speaker 1: If they really wanted people that cry, they would have
Speaker 1: used the stay of a gun on a dog.
Speaker 4: Semonof explained in the ad Search party from ring us
Speaker 4: is Ai to help families find lost dogs.
Speaker 6: Be a hero in your neighborhood with search parties.
Speaker 1: Well, you don't want to be a hero. You don't
Speaker 1: want to be a hero, you selfish fuck. Don't you
Speaker 1: want to be a hero so that we can monitor
Speaker 1: your children and know exactly where they are when you
Speaker 1: don't for predators and all the people that we work
Speaker 1: for in the child trafficking rings. Don't you? Don't you
Speaker 1: want cameras on your doors and everything else so that
Speaker 1: we knew exactly when your back is turned. Don't you
Speaker 1: want that? Don't you want us to be able to
Speaker 1: pray upon your neighbors to children too? Come on, come on,
Speaker 1: be a hero, Be a hero. For the Devil double
Speaker 1: to everyone for free right now? Oh yeah, for free? Awesome.
Speaker 1: Nothing's got you about that at all.
Speaker 4: YouTube comments like quote, this is like the commercial they
Speaker 4: show at the beginning of a dystopian sci fi film
Speaker 4: to quickly show people how bad things have gotten. Glad
Speaker 4: people are freaking out. This is dystope I become in reality.
Speaker 4: I'm glad most people were instantly able to clock how
Speaker 4: bad this is. Amazon thinks we're all stupid and we'll
Speaker 4: fall for this angle end quote, and even Georgia Orwell
Speaker 4: chimed in from his grave quote boy did I call it?
Speaker 7: Or what?
Speaker 4: End quote? That brings us back to camera. Competitor wise
Speaker 4: who created It's amazing parody not parody commercial.
Speaker 8: You can find literally anyone, but we only use this
Speaker 8: technology to find lost dogs.
Speaker 4: Within forty the Backlash partnership says with Flock.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, okay, yeah, that's fine, but they are still
Speaker 1: partnered with Palenteer. That's that's partnered with Flock. Don't you
Speaker 1: fucking get it. It's like, okay, well we're not We're
Speaker 1: not daisy chained this way. We're daisy chained this way.
Speaker 9: Oh so much different.
Speaker 4: Whoa boom oh.
Speaker 1: Nervemind, nerve Mind, Sorry, I owe you an apology retards.
Speaker 4: The definitely not related bullshit excuse. The company isn't backtracking
Speaker 4: on its surveillance efforts, though it wrote quote community requests
Speaker 4: remain a core feature of Rings mission end quote. It
Speaker 4: simply talked up the partnership cancelation to logistics. Following a
Speaker 4: comprehensive review, we determined the planned flock safety integration would
Speaker 4: require significantly more time and resources than anticipated. As a result,
Speaker 4: we've made a joint decision to cancel the planned integration.
Speaker 1: You know what they mean by joint decision.
Speaker 4: Hey, Ring still works with Axon and what we'll call
Speaker 4: the Axon of Evil, but by default, Ring opts users
Speaker 4: in to the search party feature. So users should opt
Speaker 4: out if they feel uncomfortable with this, but of course
Speaker 4: it'd be better.
Speaker 1: Just funny part about that, though, the excess of evil
Speaker 1: is actually.
Speaker 2: The good guys.
Speaker 4: Really not use ing at all.
Speaker 1: Except that, I mean, if we're talking about and man,
Speaker 1: I get I get that right, I don't remember that right?
Speaker 4: Okay, it hurt the founder's feelings. If you do opt out,
Speaker 4: just know that a billionaire Simon Off will consider you
Speaker 4: a bad person.
Speaker 1: His name is semen Off. For fock's sake, why do
Speaker 1: we care? And he looks like it just catcher, As he.
Speaker 4: Explained in an interview, Okay, I don't like I'm a
Speaker 4: bad person. I don't want to help with the dog
Speaker 4: in the neighborhood. That's fine.
Speaker 3: You can do that, like we allow you to do that.
Speaker 1: Don't you don't. Don't you talk to me, nigger. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's gonna look really funny when your heads in your
Speaker 1: lap and you're no one will ever know, and you're
Speaker 1: not and you're not just trying to bend over there
Speaker 1: to impress people like it's actually just resting in your
Speaker 1: lap and.
Speaker 6: Your privacy information is all fine.
Speaker 4: That gas flighting sounds familiar.
Speaker 8: Their intentions are clearly deeply conflicted and and uh, their
Speaker 8: intentions are clearly you know not.
Speaker 1: He's talking about the US completely in the best interest
Speaker 1: of society. Two tubes their interviews.
Speaker 4: Someone Off likens not opting into search party as similar
Speaker 4: to not helping reunite a lost dog with its owner.
Speaker 6: This is no different than if you found a dog
Speaker 6: in your backyard and you looked on their collar and
Speaker 6: you call the number. All we're doing is when it's
Speaker 6: found on your ring camera. We're saying, you know, hey, Jamie,
Speaker 6: this dog looks like this dog, do you want to
Speaker 6: contact your neighbor? If you say no, it would be
Speaker 6: the same thing. Is that dog being in your backyard
Speaker 6: of just throwing it into the next backyard.
Speaker 1: It isn't anything like that.
Speaker 4: It is literally completely different. This is like so stupid
Speaker 4: to argue with because it's not even it's completely non
Speaker 4: fucking sequitter. The entire concept is different. You didn't find
Speaker 4: the dog in your backyard and call your neighbor. Your
Speaker 4: camera automatically tag things it thinks are dogs and also
Speaker 4: probably people.
Speaker 1: In cars of course people. It's a camera failing.
Speaker 4: Everything and everyone on the street, and then through automated systems.
Speaker 1: The dogs of the background crossfire that they're using for
Speaker 1: the cover. It's like, no, we're a monitoring dude. Come on.
Speaker 1: What does the Jew do? What have we established already?
Speaker 1: How do they fight warfare? When they're the ones engaged
Speaker 1: in battle? They don't go after adults. They go after
Speaker 1: their children. How do they operate their cults? They don't
Speaker 1: typically go after the people, the adults. They pray and
Speaker 1: get together and pray upon the children. What do you
Speaker 1: Palenteer was making threat assessment lists for Gaza that they
Speaker 1: followed throughout that whole fucking two years of bombing and
Speaker 1: killing and shooting children and shooting the parents so that
Speaker 1: the child would come out and rest to their bomb,
Speaker 1: so they kill the fucking kid too. This is what
Speaker 1: they were doing, sending rockets into freaking apartments with newborn
Speaker 1: babies in there. What do you think the freaking cameras
Speaker 1: are for? Who do you think they're monitoring your children?
Speaker 1: That's what they're going to strike, That's what they're gonna
Speaker 1: have ultimate access over and have the eyes in the sky,
Speaker 1: So they will have you by your balls, and they'll
Speaker 1: already have half twisted. If you don't comply to every
Speaker 1: fucking thing that they say, bad things will happen. Bad
Speaker 1: things will happen even if you do, because that makes
Speaker 1: you a weak, fucking goy. They have no respect for
Speaker 1: you any way, shape or form, no matter what the
Speaker 1: fuck you do. It's random, it's violent, it's diabolical, and
Speaker 1: hell's the impossibility of reason. You don't you don't try
Speaker 1: to reason with something that wants you to. You don't
Speaker 1: try to compromise or come to a common ground solution
Speaker 1: with something that's only purpose is your destruction, that only
Speaker 1: will be satisfied when you're in misery, suffering, and dead,
Speaker 1: And they want you to suffer the most by harming
Speaker 1: your children firsts. And that is why you don't want
Speaker 1: the fucking camera. Fuck the dogs. How long have we
Speaker 1: been going around being able to find lost dogs without
Speaker 1: the fucking cameras? Did anybody ever stop to think that,
Speaker 1: like we've we've succeeded as a as a society of
Speaker 1: dog finders for as long as we have, But now
Speaker 1: we need these cameras because we're all we've all lost
Speaker 1: skills that we used to have because of these things.
Speaker 1: We're all retarded. Now, we don't know how to do
Speaker 1: anything unless we ask a fucking Claude or Gemini. You know,
Speaker 1: if you ask chat GPD, you become even more retarded
Speaker 1: and you could ever possibly imagine. No, No, we don't
Speaker 1: need technology to do simple things. We don't need a
Speaker 1: device unlock code to change brake pads. And if we
Speaker 1: don't need to pay two thousand dollars for a proprietary
Speaker 1: tool in order to change them, just don't buy those
Speaker 1: fucking cars. Preserve the older vehicles now because they're going
Speaker 1: to try to get rid of all of them, realize
Speaker 1: and give me lots of money so that I can
Speaker 1: become fewer, like I said earlier year. And then as
Speaker 1: far as Edward Snowman said about the the Era, I
Speaker 1: would have to look into seeing if it's possible, because
Speaker 1: I don't think I can't. I can't just put quotes
Speaker 1: around the whole fucking four hundred page book. I think
Speaker 1: it's four hundred pages. I don't remember something like that
Speaker 1: and then say and then do like an introduction to
Speaker 1: it and then like read. I don't think I can
Speaker 1: do that if there's some sort of copyright on it,
Speaker 1: if it's something where it's like I'm doing an archiveal
Speaker 1: uh preservation, it's like it's an attempted preservation reprint with
Speaker 1: just maybe footnotes from me. Well, See, the thing is,
Speaker 1: I was going to incorporate a decent portion of it
Speaker 1: with a summaried outline in great detail, but go into
Speaker 1: going into the details and the proofs a lot before
Speaker 1: moving on to the next topic with the book too.
Speaker 1: In that way, it's not even though I'll be taking
Speaker 1: chunks of it out, it won't be as involved as just,
Speaker 1: you know, just rewriting the whole thing to new Payton,
Speaker 1: new New Uh, what do you call it? Papyrus there
Speaker 1: and then then then slapping the name on it. It's like,
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't. To me, that would be harder
Speaker 1: for me to do because there's no creative process in
Speaker 1: my part to do it, and there's no commentary on mine.
Speaker 1: I mean there would be in maybe the beginning and
Speaker 1: the end of the book, but I feel like the
Speaker 1: guidance along the way. I thought they had to break
Speaker 1: it up a little bit. Guidance meaning like explanations of
Speaker 1: things as they happen, so you don't have to read
Speaker 1: a whole book and then go back and try to
Speaker 1: remember what parts didn't make sense to you, where I
Speaker 1: could address them as it goes and emphasize why it's
Speaker 1: that that key piece of information is as important as
Speaker 1: and should be recognized as such. That'd be hard for
Speaker 1: me not to do that. So I think it's better
Speaker 1: than maybe do a treatisey and then expand out a
Speaker 1: couple more chapters and be like, and this is how
Speaker 1: they implement their assault. The moon call the Saturn moon
Speaker 1: coal influenced their assault on the present day ancestors of
Speaker 1: the Gothic arians of the past, and how they poison us,
Speaker 1: how Thomas math Malthus came into the picture past to
Speaker 1: her talk about base Shop and how he was overlooked,
Speaker 1: and how Rothschild money was backing past to her to
Speaker 1: make the healthcare into death care and the genocidal egenics program,
Speaker 1: and in addition to everything else that came after that
Speaker 1: with the destructive of American YadA, YadA, YadA. But all
Speaker 1: that stuff, as you as you can see, it happens
Speaker 1: after it's implemented and adopted into this country after the
Speaker 1: Civil War.
Speaker 4: It mapped it back to a person like.
Speaker 1: Rockefeller came after the Civil War, as far as the railroads,
Speaker 1: as far as the taking over of the medical establishment.
Speaker 1: This all had to happen after the Jews already assumed
Speaker 1: control and power of this territory. These are the indicators
Speaker 1: that that that what I say about that transfer of
Speaker 1: power did occur, because it's what snowballing of all the
Speaker 1: other things that happened after the fact without any resistance,
Speaker 1: because it was already h the barriers they had to break,
Speaker 1: they already broke dur in the Civil War.
Speaker 4: That's not the same thing as finding a dog in
Speaker 4: your backyard. Later in the interview, he suggested that search
Speaker 4: party just allows you to be a great neighbor.
Speaker 6: It's allowing your camera to be an intelligent assistant for
Speaker 6: you and then allowing.
Speaker 4: You to be a great neighbor. And we're sure your
Speaker 4: neighbors will appreciate.
Speaker 1: I want to be a great neighbor. Yes, you know
Speaker 1: how I'd be a great neighbor. You don't spy on them.
Speaker 4: He'd being a great neighbor the next time the Feds
Speaker 4: knock on their door for being against the party. This
Speaker 4: has made all the worse when you consider MIT's study
Speaker 4: titled quote the cop in your neighbor's doorbell, Amazon rain.
Speaker 1: And the spread God nice, the guy got Italian on
Speaker 1: top there from my t saying this is fucking bullshit.
Speaker 1: This is bullshit, good Dan Colacchi.
Speaker 4: Anticipatory mass surveillance end quote, which stated quote we show
Speaker 4: that users actively framed video subjects as criminal and suspicious,
Speaker 4: that the race of a neighborhood has a significant impact
Speaker 4: on posting raids, and provide some evidence that the neighbors
Speaker 4: app may be used as a racial gatekeeping tool.
Speaker 1: And well good use it against the Jews. No, they
Speaker 1: won't do that, because it's the Jews that operate all
Speaker 1: of AI. Does that better bother than anybody. Oh, they're
Speaker 1: just they're just really good as stuff and they just
Speaker 1: are just totally grossly underrepresented. While this is making me
Speaker 1: dizzy looking at this freaking honeycomb, It's like I can
Speaker 1: like reach into the screen and pull back out my soul. Wow,
Speaker 1: it's creepy. It's like an optical illusion. I'm gonna stare
Speaker 1: at it for a while. Just don't say anything in
Speaker 1: your confused I don't. I don't want you to just
Speaker 1: rip my concentration. I don't concentrate well.
Speaker 4: Brings capability to go beyond tracking what a dog looks like.
Speaker 4: Back in December, the company revealed that its devices use
Speaker 4: AI for facial recognition. The company support page elaborates quote.
Speaker 1: I didn't hear any motherfucking chirps yet. I gotta get
Speaker 1: going soon, Guys, Come on.
Speaker 4: After you turn on familiar Faces and your writ app,
Speaker 4: your camera learns to recognize people over time, similar to
Speaker 4: how you recognize friends and family. When your camera sees
Speaker 4: that person again, you receive a personalized.
Speaker 1: Not just like I just like how I recognize friends
Speaker 1: and family. I go to the database and I ask
Speaker 1: the police do I know this person? Who are? They
Speaker 1: give me a dossier and then they're like, yes, data
Speaker 1: is cousin Bob. Cousin Bob is a registered sex offender
Speaker 1: and beats his wife.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, that Bob.
Speaker 1: Kidding.
Speaker 4: Pats such as Chris at front door instead of there's
Speaker 4: a person at your front door. Even though familiar faces
Speaker 4: is opt in, as Senator at Markey pointed out, its existing.
Speaker 1: So it's a really creepy what do they call it?
Speaker 8: Uh? Uh?
Speaker 1: What do they call it? Uh? Call right d except
Speaker 1: as based on not your phone number? Hm, I don't know,
Speaker 1: based on your face? Does everybody else have a problem that?
Speaker 4: It is still problematic? Quote? Although Amazon stayed at the
Speaker 4: ring door, owners must opt in that.
Speaker 1: Oh but don't worry. This would totally not be the
Speaker 1: way that they get you to comply to a digital
Speaker 1: ID at all and tell you that you're lying. And
Speaker 1: of course, yeah, the AI, being as fucking retarded as
Speaker 1: it is, could never be wrong. So there's no way
Speaker 1: in hell it would misidentify you and then argue with
Speaker 1: you that you're not who you say you are or
Speaker 1: that you're somebody else that they don't like when you're not.
Speaker 1: But if you're on the right side of the history,
Speaker 1: you will be on the wrong side of them anyway.
Speaker 4: The new facial recognition feature that safeguard does not extend
Speaker 4: individuals who are unknowingly captured on video by a ring
Speaker 4: doorbell camera. These individuals never receive notice, let alone the
Speaker 4: opportunity to opt in or out of having their faces
Speaker 4: scanned and logged in a database using facial recognition technology.
Speaker 1: Nice I heard the horse that time? Did anybody else?
Speaker 1: You're the horse?
Speaker 3: What all that?
Speaker 1: I heard the horse? That was a That was a
Speaker 1: tense spot from All Reliable. That's awesome, Old Reliable. Thank you. Aloha.
Speaker 1: Snack bar says hrvat you you and you and uh
Speaker 1: uh Edward Snowman say that that's hilarious. That that is
Speaker 1: a big ass coffee cup. You know it was a
Speaker 1: very good toasty tosty. It was not very good. Godfather's
Speaker 1: in the house. Hello, Oh yeah, that's Friday. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go to the Friday n munch of is my daughter.
Speaker 1: But I ate like a fucking asshole today, so I'm
Speaker 1: not eating when I go there. I'm just gonna get
Speaker 1: her stuff for British at a book and to become
Speaker 1: fewer buck snowy, start listening. I love that man, Thank
Speaker 1: you so much. That is the perfect explanation right there
Speaker 1: as to why it has to be done. Snorri has
Speaker 1: ruined people, and you know what don Kosher slut salt salt,
Speaker 1: I mean, uh is perpetuating that bullshit. And I don't
Speaker 1: want to every cross pass with her because I'll say
Speaker 1: things that it will not be taken back. Let's see
Speaker 1: get him Dan nice. Seems good to me. Your voice
Speaker 1: is good, cool, cool, Thank you Ard. About what time
Speaker 1: can we expect you back? You know what seven point
Speaker 1: thirty is about? When well, seven o'clock when I get
Speaker 1: my daughter. If we get there, if we get to
Speaker 1: the other place a roun seven thirty, she might spend
Speaker 1: an hour with her friends. There's a one of the
Speaker 1: one of her gymnastics friends families, and there's like two
Speaker 1: sisters that look identical, a mom that looks very much
Speaker 1: like that, those twos, those two sisters, and then there's
Speaker 1: a little girl that's when that's in the gymnastics with
Speaker 1: my daughter, and then they have like a couple of
Speaker 1: other kids but there they have a taco stand there,
Speaker 1: so we go there to be patronize their taco stand,
Speaker 1: and she gets to hang out with their friends and
Speaker 1: it's nice, nice, wholesome little time that we have. He's
Speaker 1: a sodom. I they hate humanity. Yeah, I can't imagine
Speaker 1: why they They brutalize their own asses, and then they
Speaker 1: blame everybody else for the way they don't they they
Speaker 1: their their condition and their experience of real life. Is it?
Speaker 1: Is it because it's an It's an abuse trait or
Speaker 1: habit that's been carried on because it was instilled duringrained
Speaker 1: in them at an early age. Semen off stain remover
Speaker 1: looks like a Kike Yeah, good one. Yeah, maybe that
Speaker 1: would be a that would be a good uh ai
Speaker 1: ai product, like spick and span. Tell me that's not
Speaker 1: how's that not racist? It's a it's a cleaning product.
Speaker 1: They you know, they're they're usually house cleaners, and it's
Speaker 1: called spick and span. Uh before there were sensors. Hey, Dan,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking I shouldn't have said anything that would mess
Speaker 1: with you or next book. Don't worry about it too much.
Speaker 1: I just have to you know, you you just make
Speaker 1: me make me think about it more and how I
Speaker 1: want to like a like a clean, fresh cop dude,
Speaker 1: the cheapest I've seen the British DA let's just do
Speaker 1: a curse research. I was supposed to say, ill you
Speaker 1: can go to shopping. Yeah, forty three is what I thought.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a cool book right there cover, But
Speaker 1: that one's eighty five fifty seven thirty nine. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're not they're not cheap. And it's not that it's
Speaker 1: not an extremely long book either. That one's a little cheaper.
Speaker 1: But look, how look how fucking gross that pep cover
Speaker 1: is so Barnes and Negre so somebody else is already
Speaker 1: republishing them. They're just not putting any care into it.
Speaker 1: And they there are companies out there that scour that
Speaker 1: like the uh the books that are out of print,
Speaker 1: that are out of their copyright time, and they'll just
Speaker 1: read it so they don't have to pay any royalties
Speaker 1: or whatever they do. They just well scoop up these
Speaker 1: generic books and then and then republish them and then
Speaker 1: sell them to you because loophole. So I mean it's like, uh,
Speaker 1: it's kind of like it's kind of like an open
Speaker 1: thing that so a lot of these companies do. I
Speaker 1: think Penguin Books used to even do that, and they
Speaker 1: used to have those those Penguin paperbacks that used to
Speaker 1: be on the spin racks. It's like, uh, cheap versions
Speaker 1: of it, like the these generic cover types. Like I would,
Speaker 1: I would make it awesome and I would actually definitely
Speaker 1: make it a hardcover version too.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 1: I have a card cover version of my other books.
Speaker 1: I mean I as well just carry on the tradition
Speaker 1: and do that. And I like the textbook bigger size
Speaker 1: like this is great for people who just wanted to
Speaker 1: read it as if it's any any of the books
Speaker 1: six by nine to decent size. It's a little bit
Speaker 1: bigger than your typical Stephen King book unless you get
Speaker 1: the bigger the mid the mid range of the Stephen
Speaker 1: King book before it goes into the hardcover right. But
Speaker 1: as you can tell, like Scott SHARE's book in mine
Speaker 1: are the same size, and he has he sent this
Speaker 1: one to me. This is pretty awesome. He has his
Speaker 1: in color, this one isn't. This is Barnes and Noble,
Speaker 1: not in color. But I also have the colored version
Speaker 1: in the eight and a half by eleven, which is
Speaker 1: there's a paperback version, and it's a hardcover version, and
Speaker 1: that would be the way I would probably do it
Speaker 1: again if I could figure out the Lulu in order
Speaker 1: to make an actual cover, because it wasn't sitting right,
Speaker 1: and I gotta gotta keep on guessing the dimensions and
Speaker 1: then trying to upload it again, and each time it
Speaker 1: was off. And I'm like, this is taken forever. And
Speaker 1: I've already got three other formats of it. I'm like,
Speaker 1: I'll just make a digital copy for Lulu, and they'll
Speaker 1: just make a digital copy for who is the other one? Oh,
Speaker 1: I forgot the name. I'll tell you in a second, though,
Speaker 1: what's the name of that Cobo? Cobo is like a
Speaker 1: It's like Kindle in Europe or something like that. It's
Speaker 1: like a different company that And then I am try
Speaker 1: it for free for fourteen days, then pay only seven
Speaker 1: ninety nine a month. Oh that's the difference, you know.
Speaker 1: You don't have to pay seven nine nine a month
Speaker 1: for my book. He's just nine ninety nine months. But
Speaker 1: that's a digital copy. Look how nice that cover camp
Speaker 1: looks on that pit on that screen though, nice and bright.
Speaker 1: I think in the future, though, I'm not gonna have
Speaker 1: pitch myself on the front at all. But yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: so everybody's awesome, thank you. I'm going to continue on
Speaker 1: here for a little bit more and then we'll go
Speaker 1: on to the next thing. I'm really excited about starting
Speaker 1: to write this, but I have to also be successfully
Speaker 1: able to I don't want it to take and drag
Speaker 1: out years. And by the way, there's no copy and
Speaker 1: paste if I ever, like when I start doing the
Speaker 1: transfer of sections of the British Edow while I write
Speaker 1: about it, there's not going to be any copy and
Speaker 1: paste because the way that this thing has been preserved,
Speaker 1: it's not something that you can highlights. It's not text format.
Speaker 1: It's like pictures. So that's why I can't control f
Speaker 1: and find word and word search it. Because it's technically
Speaker 1: seeing it all as one image rather than being separate words.
Speaker 1: I can't. I also can't you grab it and then
Speaker 1: placed it like I. That helped me a lot when
Speaker 1: I was taking parts of articles and doing my book.
Speaker 1: I can't do that there. I have to type out
Speaker 1: the whole thing. It's gonna be a while.
Speaker 4: Non consenting biastanders into a biometric database without their knowledge
Speaker 4: or consent. This is an unacceptable privacy violation. End quote,
Speaker 4: nonprofit Digital Rights Scroup, Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Speaker 1: That's so cool that we heard the horse. Though I
Speaker 1: actually heard the horse this time. I didn't just see
Speaker 1: the chirp. I heard the horse. The horse. Nay, that's awesome,
Speaker 1: and now we just got to see I didn't see
Speaker 1: the screen, so I don't know if did a horse
Speaker 1: pop up on your end, I mean, a unicorn pop
Speaker 1: up on your end? All reliable? Did it pop up
Speaker 1: on my screen? Because I wouldn't see it because I
Speaker 1: was looking at a different screen.
Speaker 4: Statement writing quote. Amazon rains upcoming face recognition tool has
Speaker 4: the potential to violate the privacy rights of millions of
Speaker 4: people and could result on Amazon breaking state biometric privacy laws.
Speaker 4: In addition to RITN captin biometric data, we also have
Speaker 4: other concerns like public agencies sharing written information and data.
Speaker 1: Well, we wouldn't have any of these concerns if the
Speaker 1: leadership of our country wasn't a bunch of people who
Speaker 1: lie to us as they rape and murder our children,
Speaker 1: and if they weren't part of a death cult that
Speaker 1: wanted all of mankind besides as our cult, to die.
Speaker 1: So the issue here isn't the progress of technology. The
Speaker 1: issue is who's hands it's in, And no, we shouldn't
Speaker 1: have I mean to give it this way, I guess.
Speaker 1: And this is going to vary depending on your family experience.
Speaker 1: But I had a good family life and I you know.
Speaker 8: Well.
Speaker 1: But even even then, like do you really want your
Speaker 1: mom and your dad even though you love them and
Speaker 1: try to keep as little secrets away from them as possible.
Speaker 1: Maybe if you have a good relationship, but you still
Speaker 1: want some of your privacy, right, you probably wouldn't want
Speaker 1: them to have this type of tool. Why the hell
Speaker 1: would you want somebody who is looking for excuses in
Speaker 1: ways to fuck you and literally nail you to two
Speaker 1: pieces of wood like jeseus, you know, nail you to
Speaker 1: the fucking wall. Why would you want them to have
Speaker 1: this tool? So it's not, oh, your anti progress or
Speaker 1: anti technology. No, it's not acceptable based on the nature
Speaker 1: of those who are going to have access to it,
Speaker 1: and those infiltrators have to all be removed from existence
Speaker 1: in this country before any of this would have been acceptable.
Speaker 1: And even then it's still fucking creepy. I don't trust
Speaker 1: your random freaking God knows who who can access this
Speaker 1: stuff openly because it's not protected any predator and certainly
Speaker 1: any predator, any predator who has enough money to place
Speaker 1: orders for whoever children they want, and the fact that
Speaker 1: they have video, it's like you don't have to I
Speaker 1: don't rather say, oh, keep your children off the internet,
Speaker 1: don't put them on you know, don't put them on Facebook,
Speaker 1: don't put them on Instagram. This flock stuff makes that
Speaker 1: noble and void now because it doesn't matter if you
Speaker 1: don't share. It's being shared, and there's access to way
Speaker 1: too many intimate like guys in like you know, private.
Speaker 1: Don't expect people to be watching time in your young
Speaker 1: children's lives that they can thumb through, you know, flick through.
Speaker 1: I'm just using this as as in the metaphor and
Speaker 1: say oh that one, give me that one, and then
Speaker 1: the people with all that cash holda these demonic fucks
Speaker 1: will go out and grab that child. This is what
Speaker 1: flock is going to be used for. Regardless of flock,
Speaker 1: even like fucking play plausible deniability. I can't believe they
Speaker 1: would have never used it for that if you leave
Speaker 1: it open to the fucking public, and there's people out
Speaker 1: there who do this stuff it's gonna be used that way.
Speaker 1: You know, they'll still do more to cover that up
Speaker 1: than they will they would to like say, wow, that's
Speaker 1: bad and these people are bad. They're never gonna do that,
Speaker 1: because they're gonna they're the ones who made that, made
Speaker 1: that vulnerability into a reality. Not cool, man, not cool
Speaker 1: in any way. We look at that. If the OVA
Speaker 1: and their ov cult, these freaking death cult sons of bitches,
Speaker 1: these child sacrificers, this Moon cult, the Saturn cult, this
Speaker 1: fucking serpent wolf jew cult of supremacy didn't control everything,
Speaker 1: including every one of these goddamn AI companies, what the
Speaker 1: hell is that all about. I still wouldn't want them
Speaker 1: to have that access because I don't trust anybody to
Speaker 1: have that type of information and not do something wicked
Speaker 1: with it. That's not human nature, that's human nature. It's
Speaker 1: their influence rubbing off on people, infecting their brains over millennia.
Speaker 1: You can't say that that infestation, that parasitic infection, is
Speaker 1: human nature because the Europeans didn't start that way, and
Speaker 1: most of us still are pure of that fucking sickness
Speaker 1: and evil. That's why we're still here fighting them, and
Speaker 1: that's why they still see us as the biggest threat
Speaker 1: and need every minority on the planet to think that
Speaker 1: we are racists and inherently evil and all this other stuff,
Speaker 1: because it's the Jews that hate everybody. Good luck, droids,
Speaker 1: good luck when they get if and when no if,
Speaker 1: because there's no way it's not gonna happen. But if
Speaker 1: they ever succeeded in getting rid of all the Europeans,
Speaker 1: all the people who have nobility, who have been protecting
Speaker 1: your asses without you knowing, but who have most certainly
Speaker 1: been supporting your asses, not because we wanted to, but
Speaker 1: because the corrupt juice system forced us to be. You
Speaker 1: would have had to stand up on your own two feet,
Speaker 1: and you probably would be not as much of a
Speaker 1: fucking entitled piece of shit right now if it was
Speaker 1: up to us and you went through our society. Instead,
Speaker 1: they made you crippled and retarded children dependent on us,
Speaker 1: and then told you to hate the very thing that
Speaker 1: keeps you alive. So if you ever do get rid
Speaker 1: of us, you're fucked. All of you are fucked. You'll
Speaker 1: soon realize just how much of your existence was dependent
Speaker 1: on the big, evil, bad white man. The pathetic fucks.
Speaker 4: Departments and Agenciest states that federal agencies are unable to
Speaker 4: request footage through the Community request tool. A RING spokesperson
Speaker 4: told Consumer Reports that quote, it has always been our
Speaker 4: policy that only local police are able to create community requests,
Speaker 4: and local public safety agencies can only request videos for
Speaker 4: themselves end quote. However, the RING spokesperson continued by saying, quote,
Speaker 4: customers do not have the ability to request footage not
Speaker 4: be shared with other police agencies. End quote. In other words,
Speaker 4: to clear up that language, as Consumer Reports said, quote
Speaker 4: that means your footage could eventually be shared with other
Speaker 4: government agencies and you don't have a way to get
Speaker 4: the videos deleted end quote. As you mentioned earlier with
Speaker 4: Senator Wyden's example.
Speaker 1: Of unlet's also remember the block safety footage that's stored
Speaker 1: for thirty days or more is accessible to anybody who
Speaker 1: has a commercial freak and browser and knows what to
Speaker 1: look for. As Ben Jordan, who's a kind of a
Speaker 1: douche on his own in his own right, has shown,
Speaker 1: now you don't really catch it in what Ben Jordan
Speaker 1: says that some of the things he says, you can
Speaker 1: catch it. He's kind of kind of like a libtard. Right.
Speaker 1: But also you'll hear him talk about unisef Ukraine. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: unics f Ukraine. Are they the victims? Really? He's he
Speaker 1: anything that you buy from him, anything that you uh,
Speaker 1: whatever the fuck it is, anything he makes off of
Speaker 1: his videos he gives to unisf Ukraine. What about the Russia?
Speaker 1: Good about two people here? Why are the activists always
Speaker 1: giving away to fucking people who are godly getting billions
Speaker 1: of dollars from our government? Why is that? Why don't
Speaker 1: they help with somebody in their own neighborhood. Why don't
Speaker 1: they strengthen this country? They got so much money that
Speaker 1: they don't need to take any proceeds. Well, don't they
Speaker 1: do something in here? Won't they improve their fucking own backyard?
Speaker 4: Local law enforcement sharing information with steral officials government entities
Speaker 4: have data and evidence across departments before. In February twenty
Speaker 4: twenty six, The Guardian co published an investigation by The
Speaker 4: seventy four, a nonprofit news agency covering the US education system.
Speaker 4: The investigation said that police departments have shared camera data
Speaker 4: with the Department of Homeland Security. According to the Guardians
Speaker 4: report quote, multiple law enforcement leaders acknowledged that they conducted
Speaker 4: the searches in the audit logs to help the Department
Speaker 4: of Homeland Security or DHS enforce federal immigration laws. End quote.
Speaker 4: The audit logs come from Texas school districts that work
Speaker 4: with flock Safety. As another example, ICE's two eighty seven
Speaker 4: G program authorizes local and state law enforcement to quote
Speaker 4: perform specified immigration officer functions under ICE's direction to do oversight.
Speaker 4: End quote. ICE has three to eighty seven G program
Speaker 4: models for agencies in the task force model, officers have
Speaker 4: some limited immigration authority and can share information directly with ICE. Meanwhile,
Speaker 4: the government is improving how it's sharing information. So we'll
Speaker 4: go through an example with the Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 4: where the DHIS has a program called Law Enforcement Information
Speaker 4: Sharing Initiative or l EIS aka LIES. The program is
Speaker 4: intended to quote sure to the right persons at the
Speaker 4: right time and the right way. End quote. On ICE's website,
Speaker 4: LIES described its information sharing as such quote LIES serves
Speaker 4: as an active advocacy.
Speaker 1: Law enforcement information system or something you said.
Speaker 4: Board of law enforcement information sharing.
Speaker 1: Both sharing law enforcement information to sharing. So it's LIES
Speaker 1: with two letters to.
Speaker 4: Flip external to DHS. DHS designated ICE has the lead
Speaker 4: for law enforcement information sharing, which includes those programs that
Speaker 4: involve biometrics for DHS and for all law enforcement component agencies.
Speaker 4: LIES coordinates throughout the law enforcement community to improve the
Speaker 4: understanding of information needs, provide leadership and resolving policy issues
Speaker 4: that may inhibit law enforcement information sharing, and develop approaches
Speaker 4: to overcome traditional barriers to information sharing. Another Department of
Speaker 4: Homeland Security website describes LIES as a non public face
Speaker 4: in web service that functions as a backkill highway data
Speaker 4: sharing system. First of all, this federal program encourages information sharing,
Speaker 4: including biometrics, with local level and state law enforcement agencies. Secondly,
Speaker 4: the government wants to resolve policy issues that get in
Speaker 4: their way or as they said, quote may inhibit law
Speaker 4: enforcement information sharing.
Speaker 1: Oh you mean like that Fourth Amendment or the need
Speaker 1: for a warrant. Yeah. No, this all bypasses that because
Speaker 1: they know all your shit, all your information. This is
Speaker 1: another reason why this constance and invasive surveillance is completely
Speaker 1: unlawful and unconstitutional. If they wanted to find something on
Speaker 1: you or inspect something, they would need to do it
Speaker 1: lawfully and in respect of the First Amendment, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: the Fourth Amendment and the Bill of Rights is not
Speaker 1: even it's barely taught taught to police officers because that's
Speaker 1: not the profile personality that they're looking for. They just
Speaker 1: want somebody who is like released like hounds whenever they
Speaker 1: get a complaint, and they completely one hundred percent trust
Speaker 1: that complaint and the complaintant and just go in with
Speaker 1: a pre determined outcome in their minds and a pre
Speaker 1: I guess you said, ascertained or whatever. What do you
Speaker 1: call a judgment of guilt upon you. They're basically conducting
Speaker 1: court right in front of you. You know they're not.
Speaker 1: They're assuming guilt. They got us what you say, and
Speaker 1: then they just look for reasons to arrest you and
Speaker 1: to identify you. And in a recent case, the guy
Speaker 1: was on his property at his house, and they still
Speaker 1: they like they need that id, like they need crack.
Speaker 1: They're told to do to get it. They're not told
Speaker 1: that there's UH laws prohibiting them from demanding it in
Speaker 1: every case, and they will. They will put you. They
Speaker 1: will put you in jail simply for not identifying. That's
Speaker 1: how much of these people's are. They're pieces of shit. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: don't do that. Lies. I'm looking up lies right now.
Speaker 1: I don't know why they put an ally at the end.
Speaker 1: That's why I was trying to figure it out. They're
Speaker 1: trying to not make it look like lies, so they
Speaker 1: put another eye at the end, law Enforcement information Sharing initiative.
Speaker 1: They put it in an eye at the end so
Speaker 1: they can it's an initiative, so they can so it
Speaker 1: doesn't look like lies anymore. Law enforcement information sharing full stop.
Speaker 1: But then then they put initiative on there the quote.
Speaker 4: To overcome them as barriers to sharing that information. In
Speaker 4: other words, regulations that protect you are in their way,
Speaker 4: and they need ways to work around them with loopholes.
Speaker 4: Considering the federal government explicitly said that it wants to
Speaker 4: do this. Who knows where ring camera videos or data
Speaker 4: from any other consumer security devices that are cloud connected
Speaker 4: go once officials get it. That's kind of our concern here,
Speaker 4: and ring cameras and consumer security cameras at large present
Speaker 4: a lot of problems for privacy, but people don't take
Speaker 4: it seriously enough where I think, thanks to things like
Speaker 4: clicking except cookies. When you get a privacy notice on
Speaker 4: a web page, people just you view it as well.
Speaker 4: I don't have any privacy anyway, this is a lot
Speaker 4: worse than that. This is real world shit where people
Speaker 4: can track you and build a profile on you. And
Speaker 4: these cameras also present new vectors for law enforcement agencies
Speaker 4: to be able to use parallel construction. Parallel construction is
Speaker 4: also known as evidentiary laundering. Wikipedia defines it as a
Speaker 4: quote process of building a parallel or separate evidentiary basis
Speaker 4: for a criminal investigation in order to limit disclosure as
Speaker 4: to origins of an investigation end quote. In a twenty
Speaker 4: eighteen webinar description, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said,
Speaker 4: quote this practice allows the government to obscure secret surveillance
Speaker 4: technologies and programs, or potentially illegal investigative methods, from those
Speaker 4: accused in criminal cases and the public at large. The
Speaker 4: concept is that law enforcement agencies may suspect someone of
Speaker 4: wrongdoing for unlawfully obtained evidence. For example, if they execute
Speaker 4: a warrantless search or search the wrong location with the
Speaker 4: warrant on a house and can't admit that evidence to
Speaker 4: court because it was illegally obtained. They could then obtain
Speaker 4: surveillance footage of an individual without a warrant and lawful
Speaker 4: with these companies they partner with and find a different
Speaker 4: reason to engage with that person, then utilize the new evidence.
Speaker 1: As a right by creating a different reason based on
Speaker 1: information they're not supposed to have. Under your protections in
Speaker 1: the Fourth Amendment, you're allowed to have your privacy. Every
Speaker 1: action and knick knack that you happen to own isn't
Speaker 1: supposed to be scrutinized by some party that's constantly looking
Speaker 1: for something to pin you to the wall with and
Speaker 1: extort money from you or steal your your freedom from
Speaker 1: you with. That's what this prying volunteer, anti goyam fucking
Speaker 1: system is doing. It's constantly persecuting you. And of course
Speaker 1: you can hear it just by that word persecution that
Speaker 1: it's like, this is perryback for all those times where
Speaker 1: you lie about us being persecuted against.
Speaker 4: The retroactive means to build a parallel.
Speaker 1: All those all those programs that were totally totally not
Speaker 1: justified because they weren't fucking poisoning wells or doing anything
Speaker 1: like that, or ripping everybody off and impoverishing everybody and
Speaker 1: getting them all drunken in debt. No, they weren't doing
Speaker 1: any of that stuff, right, they weren't demoralizing and perverting
Speaker 1: their countries at all. Can't imagine why people would uh
Speaker 1: start to get irritated with them and kick them out.
Speaker 1: They are those poor, poor victims. Yet they're gonna they're
Speaker 1: chomping at the bit to do it to us. They
Speaker 1: want another puium here, They want one, even though it
Speaker 1: probably never even happen. It's just probably Jewish fantasy in
Speaker 1: the Book of Vester. But they want to mass murder.
Speaker 1: They are even calling Trump cyrus. They may as well
Speaker 1: call them mahosterus. And we're gonna be We're gonna be representative,
Speaker 1: not so much as the ten Sons of Haman, but
Speaker 1: the seventy five thousand or so Persians, which are actually
Speaker 1: Europeans that they're going to kill. But it's not going
Speaker 1: to be seventy five thousand this time. It's going to
Speaker 1: be aggregate to the present day's population, which.
Speaker 4: Is where parallel construction comes from against that person. For example,
Speaker 4: this could manifest itself in the form of pulling over
Speaker 4: an individual because their tail light is out, something that
Speaker 4: you might know by following the individual through camera systems
Speaker 4: that are already deployed, so you know where they are
Speaker 4: and you have that excuse to pull them over. That
Speaker 4: might then provide the authority is the excuse they need
Speaker 4: to pursue further with the new legally obtained through separate
Speaker 4: means or planted evidence. Prior reporting confirms the use of
Speaker 4: parallel construction by government officials. In twenty thirteen, Reuters published
Speaker 4: an exclusive piece on the use of parallel construction by
Speaker 4: the US Drug Enforcement Administration. According to the Reuters.
Speaker 1: Article, right in Reuters is one hundred percent draws child
Speaker 1: run media. And so when they talk about it in
Speaker 1: different aspects, they think still like shiftmen, shiftman and cook
Speaker 1: over here. When they talk about this stuff in reference
Speaker 1: to something else where, it's like we're rosters, barred guards,
Speaker 1: and they talk about some kind of dystopic uh, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: despotic bullshit like this. They think that you're stupid enough
Speaker 1: to think that it's not going to be misused, or
Speaker 1: that you're it won't be used against people who are
Speaker 1: not guilty of anything. So they said, oh, it's it's
Speaker 1: against drug enforcement. There are the drug dealers. The Jews
Speaker 1: are the international world drug dealers. The only thing that
Speaker 1: they've ever policed is their competition. Anyone who tries to
Speaker 1: make money doing the same thing as them. They'll be
Speaker 1: put in jail, they'll get raided, they'll get murdered, they'll
Speaker 1: get fit.
Speaker 3: What do you call it?
Speaker 1: Pablo Escobard on a rooftop, A secretive US Drug Enforcement
Speaker 1: Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wire taks, informants,
Speaker 1: and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across
Speaker 1: the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Speaker 1: Let me repeat that, a US Drug Enforcement Administration unit
Speaker 1: is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wire taps, informants, and
Speaker 1: massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation
Speaker 1: to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans. That was
Speaker 1: twenty thirteen where they with the technology now.
Speaker 4: Found be the way back machine. The DEA was forlored
Speaker 4: funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants, and a massive
Speaker 4: database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to
Speaker 4: help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Speaker 1: So that's like that, I don't know, it's not so
Speaker 1: much the plain sight thing, but it's like, uh, it's
Speaker 1: the proxy thing. Well, we're we're we're watching that guy,
Speaker 1: but we're also watching other people that he's in contact with,
Speaker 1: and then we can continue to branch out or surveillance
Speaker 1: on all these people, regardless if they've have been done
Speaker 1: anything wrong, except for in our minds, doing something wrong
Speaker 1: was crossing the path of this other person who we
Speaker 1: were investigating. But now now they're under investigation. Now we're
Speaker 1: tapping their phone. Now we're doing this. See know what
Speaker 1: I mean. It's like, this is how they get around,
Speaker 1: and this is also how they have been abusing and
Speaker 1: overriding on lawfully the need for warrants.
Speaker 4: Updated documents that' said federal agents are quote trained to
Speaker 4: recreate the invent.
Speaker 1: But when when what they do is police what your
Speaker 1: what your habits are like? I gotta understand stupid people
Speaker 1: who go and they do stupid things like substances, and
Speaker 1: then they go out and they get into an accident,
Speaker 1: they kill innocent people. Those people should be dragged through
Speaker 1: the street. But people doing whatever the fuck they want
Speaker 1: to in their own homes or responsibly some of the
Speaker 1: fucking government's business to tell them that they can't. They're
Speaker 1: not our parents. And even though I don't do any
Speaker 1: of that shit, I still don't think that it's right.
Speaker 1: And I absolutely find marijuana to be the most retarded
Speaker 1: piece of shit substance on the planet. And I absolutely
Speaker 1: I deal with people who do that. They don't think
Speaker 1: that there's any change in that in their mental state.
Speaker 1: They actually think that it helps improve them. I'm here
Speaker 1: to tell you that they're in a delusional state to
Speaker 1: thinks that way, and they're impossible to deal with in
Speaker 1: their emotional emotionally unstable on it, and easily to trigger.
Speaker 1: I hate it. I hate the fact that a weakness
Speaker 1: that like you can't go through a day without some
Speaker 1: kind of crutch. I found that despicable and in a
Speaker 1: let lacks character. I can understand having a habit or
Speaker 1: like a routine, but a dependency I don't have any
Speaker 1: respect for. Okay, what it is you do things because
Speaker 1: they're fun or because you're exploring your mind and expanding it.
Speaker 1: But you don't do it to suppress or to limit
Speaker 1: your growth or your maturity and do so for decades.
Speaker 1: That's that's self harm, that's self destruction. I don't have
Speaker 1: respect for that, especially if you're supposed to act like
Speaker 1: an adult now, or if you have children and you
Speaker 1: have responsibilities or you have a spouse and you're still
Speaker 1: doing this shit. I'm sorry, it's not medicinal. You're an asshole.
Speaker 1: I sure, I just made a bunch of enemies by
Speaker 1: saying that.
Speaker 4: Effectively.
Speaker 1: But hey, guess what, you'd be kicked out of the
Speaker 1: NS if you were doing that. Character nobility, integrity, no respect,
Speaker 1: devotion to duty.
Speaker 4: Where the information originated, A practice that some experts say
Speaker 4: violates a defendant's constitutional rights to a fair trial. End quote.
Speaker 4: Anonymous DEA officials told Reuters that the parallel construction process
Speaker 4: needed to be secret in order to quote protect sources
Speaker 4: and investigation methods. End quote. One DEA official told Reuters, quote,
Speaker 4: Parallel construction is a law enforcement technique we use every day.
Speaker 4: It's decades old, a bedrock concept end quote. But that
Speaker 4: gets even worse when there's cameras everywhere that they're partnering with.
Speaker 4: And it doesn't take much imagination to see how evidence
Speaker 4: obtained through ring cameras or any private security apparatus could
Speaker 4: be used by law enforcements in parallel construction, whether or
Speaker 4: not you actually did something wrong, And our privacy concerns
Speaker 4: with Rain didn't just disappear after the company canceled its
Speaker 4: partnership with Flock for so called logistics reasons four days
Speaker 4: after massive outcry or whatever it was. Rain was already
Speaker 4: extensively working with law enforcement and adding more AI integration
Speaker 4: into its products. Drop in Flock just serves as a
Speaker 4: convenient way for them to pretend like they were never
Speaker 4: doing that, even according to several media outlets, the company
Speaker 4: has sold tens of millions of devices and they're enabling
Speaker 4: AI features on them. It's not just Rain. There are
Speaker 4: security cameras everywhere now, which is fine, but the cloud
Speaker 4: connected cameras are the real concern.
Speaker 1: Right and they're, like I said, third party cameras are
Speaker 1: still on the flock. Flock is offering these companies to
Speaker 1: handle their data, to handle their storage, and they're just
Speaker 1: because it doesn't save Flock, just because it's not a
Speaker 1: Flock brand has nothing to do with whether or not
Speaker 1: it's being shared or is accessible as easily accessible as
Speaker 1: Ben Jordan has shown it to be. And this goes
Speaker 1: all the way down to baby monitors, guys, baby monitors
Speaker 1: in your baby's crib.
Speaker 4: Security site Safe Home estimated that of US households have
Speaker 4: at least one security camera as of twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4: This figure doesn't include cameras or recording equipment on other electronics,
Speaker 4: so phones, tablets, voice assistants, and cars are not counted.
Speaker 4: Take it a step further. Nothing stops at this point
Speaker 4: the millions of Tesla cars on the road from becoming
Speaker 4: the greatest distributive surveillance network that exists on the planet.
Speaker 4: And it's on wheels. And that's especially true considering musks
Speaker 4: ties to government.
Speaker 9: A Reuter's special report has found that employees of Tesla,
Speaker 9: the largest electric vehicle maker in the world, privately shared
Speaker 9: sometimes highly invasive videos and images recorded by the cars cameras.
Speaker 9: That's according to interviews with non informer employees.
Speaker 1: This stuff there you go, you can't jack off, and
Speaker 1: you can't see you drive through anymore.
Speaker 4: Happen in ways that seemaun expected to care.
Speaker 1: Can't put the bucket over your crotch and put a
Speaker 1: poke a hole in it.
Speaker 4: Car might be useful for a scene to the side
Speaker 4: or see someone to intentionally keyed your car. It can
Speaker 4: also be used feasibly for a surveillance network. And again
Speaker 4: it might not even be by the company that provides
Speaker 4: the service or by the government that you live under.
Speaker 4: It could also be by state sponsored attackers or they're
Speaker 4: monitoring it. Maybe you're not interesting, you think to them,
Speaker 4: but you don't know who you might interact with, or
Speaker 4: at what point you might become interesting to somebody as
Speaker 4: a target. Maybe you come into some money and now
Speaker 4: suddenly there's a reason to blackmail you. In addition to
Speaker 4: the community Request feature that police can use to ask
Speaker 4: RING customers for video, RAIN provides content to agencies directly.
Speaker 4: Rings law enforcement guidelines say it does not quote disclose
Speaker 4: user information and response to government demands unless they're required
Speaker 4: to comply and it's properly served on us end quote. Further,
Speaker 4: a ring size that has access to a customer's video
Speaker 4: only if that customer had a current Ring subscription or
Speaker 4: free try get in place at the time of the event.
Speaker 4: Rain publishes reports every six months about the request that
Speaker 4: receives from law enforce, and Rain's last report covering July
Speaker 4: to December twenty twenty five, RAINS had it disclosed information
Speaker 4: twenty six hundred twelve times.
Speaker 1: In total.
Speaker 4: Rain described oney seventy seven of these disclosures as quote
Speaker 4: content information end quote, meaning that they could include videos
Speaker 4: and recordings. Rain does not provide specifics about what it
Speaker 4: calls emergency requests. RAIN says it quote reserves the right
Speaker 4: to respond immediately to urgent law enforcement requests for information
Speaker 4: in cases involving imminent danger of death or serious physical
Speaker 4: injury to any person.
Speaker 1: Quote, and who's that determined by.
Speaker 4: Rains of bi annual reports. Do not provide details.
Speaker 1: Think about this too, okay, right, all right? They use
Speaker 1: Think about this scenario. They use CPS to steal your child,
Speaker 1: you fight in court. It was a completely unjustified reasoning
Speaker 1: for them to do so. Obviously somebody out there made
Speaker 1: a placed in order, maybe. And then they go into
Speaker 1: foster as they're being shipped to the second the one
Speaker 1: stop before the final stop, right, and the parents who
Speaker 1: are completely distraught and torn apart, go and seek and
Speaker 1: conduct a rescue mission. And you have ambler alert calling
Speaker 1: you in. But even if you get past that, you
Speaker 1: get to wherever you're going, and there's cameras inside that place,
Speaker 1: there's cameras all the way up to that place. There's
Speaker 1: cameras at that hotel wherever the fuck you want to
Speaker 1: bring your child into safe to safety, and they've already
Speaker 1: sent out their feelers and request because they want to
Speaker 1: get that lost dog. Do you understand what I'm saying here?
Speaker 1: And then the demons get that child back and put
Speaker 1: the parents in jail so they can't do it a
Speaker 1: second time. That is literally a scenario that I've watched
Speaker 1: and discussed, real life scenarios that have happened to people,
Speaker 1: not so much with the surveillance part of it, but
Speaker 1: with the weaponized government stealing children. It's been happening for
Speaker 1: a long time, for over twenty almost thirty years now,
Speaker 1: and obviously long before that, but I mean as a
Speaker 1: governmental operation in every state with shit tons of money
Speaker 1: as a kickback for doing so for about thirty years.
Speaker 4: Quest or national security requests. That means that even these
Speaker 4: first party reports, which are already inherently untrustworthy.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry almost forty years.
Speaker 4: Also are obliquely described as opaque, seeing as anything at
Speaker 4: this point can be a national security interest. The tariffs were,
Speaker 4: for example, so we couldn't find any policies.
Speaker 1: No, that's right.
Speaker 4: Thirty hunting recordings and information from traveling between agencies or corporations,
Speaker 4: once obtained by one ring is actively working with thousands
Speaker 4: of police departments and increasing.
Speaker 1: Its partnerships with Ring and Flock.
Speaker 4: Look at of these, and meanwhile, the federal government is
Speaker 4: trying to make sharing biometric information across jurisdictions easier RINGS
Speaker 4: as it maintains its customers privacy and promote safety with
Speaker 4: neighbors working together.
Speaker 1: Be a hero in your neighborhood. There, they're trying to
Speaker 1: activate a a an emotion inside of you. I feel
Speaker 1: repulse because I have no I don't need somebody else
Speaker 1: to tell me my self worth. And that just makes
Speaker 1: me angry at them and suspicious of them and then
Speaker 1: want to tear them out of the world. But be
Speaker 1: a hero in your neighborhood. It's like people are always
Speaker 1: seeking validation and they always want to virtue signal. This
Speaker 1: is what they've They've created us a social media mentality
Speaker 1: that is prone to virtue signaling rather than actually being
Speaker 1: a good person. They want people to think that they're
Speaker 1: good people. They'll run the five K for cancer and
Speaker 1: it'll be all about them and their sacrifice. Then it
Speaker 1: would be about the sick children or whatever the fuck
Speaker 1: the case is, right, they don't showcase that, they showcase
Speaker 1: how heroic they are because everybody wants a virtue signal.
Speaker 1: But they're also they have main character syndrome too.
Speaker 4: But RIN also deflects any criticism stating that its devices
Speaker 4: could be used for surveillance and whitewash's privacy concerns by saying,
Speaker 4: you can be a hero in your neighborhood. So, despite
Speaker 4: what Rain says, at this point, users of it are
Speaker 4: actively building one of the largest distributed surveillance networks in
Speaker 4: the world that's not controlled by a government technically, and
Speaker 4: rather than the US government building more surveillance infrastructure and.
Speaker 1: Having I'm sure you've seen those in your Walmart or
Speaker 1: department store parking lots and just thought, wonder what those
Speaker 1: weird things with the solar panels are those lights, says,
Speaker 1: some sort of police apparatus, fucking cameras spying on you
Speaker 1: while you're part spying on your plates, figuring out who
Speaker 1: you are and what vehicle you go into. Isn't that nice?
Speaker 1: N that's nice.
Speaker 4: To ease the acceptance of it and get the community
Speaker 4: to not resist in a major way. Corporations can sell
Speaker 4: the security devices to individual consumers, to businesses and then
Speaker 4: enable law enforcement to access the data from consumer devices.
Speaker 4: And you don't need a warrant for that either, And
Speaker 4: we have privacy until we don't, and once we no
Speaker 4: longer have privacy, the lack of it is normalized by
Speaker 4: societ and by neighbors, and you become the weird one
Speaker 4: for not having a Facebook account or for not having
Speaker 4: a ring camera on your door, and we're not getting
Speaker 4: that back. It's an overton window issue where it's shifting,
Speaker 4: and just like the cookies example on websites earlier, you
Speaker 4: slowly shift that window to keep testing what's acceptable and
Speaker 4: push the boundary, and if it's bit by bit, it
Speaker 4: becomes invisible as those rights are eroded. And privacy here
Speaker 4: is It's not just like oh, they're tracking what website
Speaker 4: type visit. This is tracking you in the physical world,
Speaker 4: who you talk to, who your friends are, who your
Speaker 4: associates are, what bumper stickers are on your car that
Speaker 4: might indicate things that are useful.
Speaker 1: Maybe I used to love putting bumper stickers on my vehicle,
Speaker 1: like different types of things that you know, movies I
Speaker 1: like to sit like that. There used to be one
Speaker 1: called the Porn Star, but it wasn't about porn stars.
Speaker 1: It was just like pictures of like pulp fiction characters
Speaker 1: and stuff like that. And I used to have. There
Speaker 1: is a clothing brand, and then there was the stickers,
Speaker 1: and so then I had some of those on my vehicle,
Speaker 1: but I was constantly getting pulled over. And then I
Speaker 1: finally realized, well, yeah, it's like having tattoos, you're identifiable.
Speaker 1: So I stopped making my my vehicle sticks out like
Speaker 1: a sort of thumb right now anyway because of what
Speaker 1: you know, the type it is, and it's not it's
Speaker 1: not common, but it's crazy how freaking much that of
Speaker 1: a difference it was when I stopped being as a
Speaker 1: uniquely identifiable It's like, well, fuck that. That that was
Speaker 1: a that was a behavior, and in a way of
Speaker 1: expressing that, I had to that I altered because of
Speaker 1: the conditions of the world, so that it suppressed my
Speaker 1: ability to do what I felt like because the trade
Speaker 1: off was I was going to get harassed more so
Speaker 1: I was.
Speaker 7: I was.
Speaker 1: Augmending my natural behavior to fucking fit a tyrannical environment.
Speaker 1: And I always hated that. That infuriates me.
Speaker 4: It's something as simple as.
Speaker 1: I have bumper stickers right now that I have from
Speaker 1: businesses that my friend zone and stuff like that, and
Speaker 1: I just I keep them. I don't put them on
Speaker 1: my car. I won't put in my own business on
Speaker 1: my vehicle because then it's everybody can ease it. You
Speaker 1: don't even have to look at the plate boom. It's
Speaker 1: something in corner of the eye peripherals. Cop they have
Speaker 1: an interaction with you once, they'll have an interaction with
Speaker 1: you a thousand times afterward, and.
Speaker 4: An indicator of your level of wealth and what neighborhood
Speaker 4: you live in, so they can target ads at you.
Speaker 4: Or maybe it's something that could be used as a
Speaker 4: blackmail or a control vector, for example, if an administration
Speaker 4: takes control, that would prefer you not be a problem
Speaker 4: for them, whatever that might mean. So if you want
Speaker 4: to use the phrase from Rain be a Hero, our
Speaker 4: suggestion would be to not use Rain. It's that simple.
Speaker 4: You can look up self hosted doorbell cameras over things
Speaker 4: like ring alternatives, self hosted find something if you're even
Speaker 4: a little bit technically capable, that you can own the
Speaker 4: data storage devices for, and that ideally is if connected
Speaker 4: to the internet, is not connected to a data center,
Speaker 4: and you're able to kind of fire all the access
Speaker 4: to your NVR, your local recording device, or whatever it
Speaker 4: may be to keep these corporations and the governments out
Speaker 4: of it. So that's over this one pretty big research
Speaker 4: piece and deep dive. We could use your help, as
Speaker 4: always in continuing the efforts on this channel, which we
Speaker 4: again are for as long as we can keep it
Speaker 4: up running without it taked in third part effort.
Speaker 1: Which is yeah, okay, okay, good there, you're done. All right, well,
Speaker 1: we'll keep going from que.
Speaker 8: O.
Speaker 1: When I get back, I gotta get out of here.
Speaker 1: Though his face looks kind of funny there, you kind
Speaker 1: of look like a froug anyway, Asian frog. All right, guys,
Speaker 1: let's go to rod here on these and if you
Speaker 1: go to if you're on Rumble, if you go to
Speaker 1: shut Up, you go on Rumble and you'll see the
Speaker 1: gifts and go to theory front Sport the campaign. The
Speaker 1: website right there. The website's one stop shop. So if
Speaker 1: you want to get on the Doctor Good membership, you
Speaker 1: can click that and you'll use this codery here for
Speaker 1: twenty five percent off the month, the weekly or the
Speaker 1: or the annually. There's no monthly anymore, and the weekly
Speaker 1: is so you kind of want to either get the
Speaker 1: annual or go back in time. And the way back
Speaker 1: machine and get it when I told you to get it,
Speaker 1: just christ And here's a clickable link to get rid
Speaker 1: to the Health Solutions show. And then there's the Azure
Speaker 1: of a Living Well right here. These are all the
Speaker 1: Whole Food multi vitamins, the Whole Food nineties Central nutrients.
Speaker 1: I got this, got this. I think that's everything that's
Speaker 1: in that picture. Oh that wait, that's Kyle Royal. I
Speaker 1: got the Core copper, the Whole Food will, the vitamin
Speaker 1: the IP six Supreme right there. But you'll see what's
Speaker 1: out there, and then you can use a quid BB five.
Speaker 1: That link brings you to a site that's all right
Speaker 1: ten percent off the other site that's Azure. Well, this
Speaker 1: one's Azure Standard. And then also you get an five
Speaker 1: percent off. When you press the little thing that says
Speaker 1: apply code, it opens up into a little bar what
Speaker 1: they call those things. Why don't always forget that fucking word.
Speaker 1: It's simple, I don't, it's gone. It just blinked. But
Speaker 1: you know, you type in the code Bravo, Bravo five
Speaker 1: or BB five, okay, and that's the house sauce is there.
Speaker 1: Speicy Honey's right there. And there's a few of those
Speaker 1: still hanging around and there you go, all right, and
Speaker 1: there's creating over here. I think we had a couple
Speaker 1: of people talking me to this is real quick, Hey, Edward,
Speaker 1: somebody said, I I got scroll down a little bit
Speaker 1: so I can see that. Why has it been weird?
Speaker 1: I really wish I really was thinking this, Edward Stumbman.
Speaker 1: I really was thinking of the British Edie somehow as
Speaker 1: an ancient artifact with the enchantment of Arthur and Guenevere,
Speaker 1: and I wanted to give them a give them as
Speaker 1: a gift to people after my own heart. I think
Speaker 1: it would be a good gift for my sister. But
Speaker 1: I'm totally not interested in dressing up Snory's work as
Speaker 1: if it were already safe for public consumption. Yeah. Really,
Speaker 1: I won't necessarily burden you with this art project, but
Speaker 1: I'll just be supportive of your next book. Okay, so
Speaker 1: that makes that's different. Then yes, drop it handles, let's
Speaker 1: thank you. Sure, um, I might be able to do that,
Speaker 1: but I still have to figure out if I can
Speaker 1: find a format of it that's not that's not like
Speaker 1: in that weird image thing where I can actually just
Speaker 1: pull it and then place it without having to type
Speaker 1: it all out because that'll be hell hell, all right,
Speaker 1: And let's see, there's a reason that Kayke's push man.
Speaker 1: I want to keeps people dumb and numb, Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: I don't want to infind anybody with that one, but
Speaker 1: I kind of had, I kind of have some strong
Speaker 1: opinions about that one, and I want, all right, I
Speaker 1: gotta go. Guys, I'll see you a little bit. Maybe
Speaker 1: we'll do run too tonight.