Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. Now that Darren Endyke and Richard Kahn have
both testified in front of Congress, there's still a lot
of questions that need to be answered, especially concerning the
settlement that was allegedly paid out to Jane Do number four. Now,
Jane do number four is also the Jane Doe that
made some serious allegations against Donald Trump, so figuring out
if this payment was paid out is pretty important, right.
It goes to the accuracy of what Jane Doe four
is saying, and if she was found credible enough to
receive a settlement, then I would think that what she
asked to say about Epstein and those around them deserves
a harder look and it deserves a robust investigation. And
as we know, that never occurred. In fact, according to
Darren Endyke, nobody ever even spoke to him about Jeffrey
Epstein's crimes, just like nobody ever spoke to Les Wexner
or anybody else on the inside of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire.
And that's all by design. The whole idea was to
keep the scope narrow and stay in the kiddie pool.
They never wanted anybody to explore the deep end because
they know the deep end is where all the secrets
are buried. So today we have an article from News
Nation and the headline questions surround Epstein co executors potential
payment to Jane do Number four. This article was authored
by Diana Falzoni. Both the Jeffrey Epstein's co executors have
testified before a congressional committee about their ties to the
deceased sex offender, and both depositions ended with questions surrounding
a potential settlement with an accuser known only as Jane
Don Number And look, again, I'm not saying that it happened.
I don't know. But what I do know for sure
is there was no real investigation. And if it was
your daughter, or your mother, or your sister or your friend,
I know you'd want an investigation at the very least,
right and then where it goes from there, that's up
to the evidence. But the fact that none of this
was ever really investigated from the beginning that should be
setting off more sirens than an airstrike in Tel Aviv.
I truly have no idea how somebody could look at
this and not be concerned. Epstein's former attorney and co executor,
Darren Endyke, testified before the House Oversight Committee on Thursday.
His former accountant fellow co executor, Richard Kahn testified last week,
and I still haven't seen the transcripts, so we don't
know exactly what was said word for word. All we
have is a summary of what went down. But just
from the summary alone, I'm not exactly impressed by what
we're hearing. In Dyke's name appears multiple times in the
DOJ Epstein files, mainly dealing with legal matters. Appearing in
those files does not indicate guilt of a crime. In
his deposition before the committee, Indyke would not confirm or
deny a settlement with Jane do Four, who accused Donald
Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of abuse when she was a minor. However,
he confirmed the existence of hard drives held by Epstein's
private investigators. Representative Robert Garcia said in a statement, why
would the private investigators have those hard drives and not
the police. It's unbelievable and it all just leads right
back to the truth of the matter that Jeffrey Epstein
was being protected, and he wasn't investigated in the manner
that he should have been. And look, something that happened
recently that you can look at as reference is what
went down with did and look at the difference. Perp
walked them, got their photo, wop rated all of his properties,
didn't let any of the properties sit. And then not
only that, tried to smack his ass with Rico. So
if you take a look at what Ditty was up to,
and then you take a look at what Epstein was
up to, how can you tell me in good faith
that Diddy deserve Rico but not Jeffrey Epstein. I'm sorry,
but I just don't buy it. And anybody trying to
pitch that either has no idea what they're talking about,
or they have a much more nefarious purpose for pitching
that kind of narrative. I mean, they took every single
one of Ditty's digital devices, phones, computers, tablets, all of it.
But these hard drives walk away and it's no big deal.
Nobody tracks them down, nobody assures that they're not going
to walk away in the first place, Nobody secures evidence.
I know, I know, just another coincidence, right, Garcia did
not provide more about what was potentially on those hard
drives in the statement. News Nation reached out to the
individual members of the Committee on both sides of the
aisle about JANGG four, and each time was referred to
committee press releases. Well that's interesting, since one does in
the committee want to run their fat yap. All they
do is talk, no action, But all of a sudden
they have nothing to say. I wonder why where's Anna
Paulina Luna. Oh maybe she's busy with the interdimensional beings.
She's way too busy to figure out if a payout
was made by a woman that's accusing the sitting president.
Nothing to see here, folks, just a gigantic hoax. Hey
you hear about carg Island. Kahn Epstein's former accountant was
deposed by the Oversight Committee on March eleventh, and some
members are demanding clarity on whether or not Con paid
a settlement to an accuser. Referred to Jane Doe for
citing CON's inconsistent and shifting statements as extremely concerning. Well, look,
we all knew that Con wasn't going to be honest.
Him and Dyke they have way too much to lose,
so if you thought that these two dudes were going
to tell the truth and blow the doors off this thing,
you were sorely mistaken, just like Laine Maxwell and everybody
else who has something to lose. If you want to
get to the truth of this, you have to listen
to the people who were abused, and you have to
listen to the whistleblowers. But they refuse to do it.
They just keep spinning their wheels in neutral like, look,
getting tovinwell in there, that's a good idea, But what
about Michael Thomas, What about the lieutenants? What about the
people that made the decisions to not have Jeffrey Epstein
with another selly. There's a lot going on, right and
with all this ground to cover, do you feel like
this Congressional committee is covering enough of that ground? I
don't think so. And I think the whole entire thing
is being driven by politics on both sides, and that's
a losing strategy at the end of the day, because
both sides are just going to retreat into their bunkers
and start blaming the other team. And while that's happening,
all of Jeffrey Epstein's buddies, while they're popping that bubbly
and laughing at all of us collectively. The March thirteenth
letter from Representative Garcia and Rocanna to CON's attorney Daniel S.
Ruzuma read, in part, on March eleventh, twenty twenty six,
your client, mister Kahan, testified in response to a question
by Representative Rocana, that Jane Do four, who Representative Kanna
represented as a woman who made allegations against President Trump,
had received a settlement from the Epstein estate on March twelfth,
twenty twenty six. You represent it to oversight Democratic staff
attorneys that you can no longer stand by your assertion
that no settlement was reached with Jane Do number four. Instead,
you stated on this second call that you can neither
confirm nor deny whether a settlement was reached with Jane
Do number four. Like, bro, come on, if there was
a settlement, there has to be paperwork, right, somebody paid
the money, somebody transferred it, somebody signed off on it.
So where's the paperwork? And if there isn't any and
there was no settlement or it was a backdoor handshake
kind of deal, that's a whole other problem. They concluded
a demand for Kahn to confirm in writing whether Jane
do four filed acclaim against the Epstein estate and if
she received a monetary settlement from the estate. News Nation
asked Razuma if his client could confirm or deny Jane
do four was paid from an Epstein account. Razuma replied,
we have no comment. Oh I bet you don't. I
bet you don't. So I'm going to take that as yes.
And I have a sneaking suspicion that this settlement was
paid out. Now, does that mean everybody's guilty and everybody
did what was alleged? Well, we know that it's not
a guilty verdict, but it doesn't look good. And I
know that I speak for most men out there. If
you're going to accuse me of something like that and
it's not true, yo, I'm going down swinging. I'm not
going to have any kind of settlement whatsoever, especially if
I have the money to fight the allegation. But all
of a sudden, these people are so quick to pay
out these settlements, right, I wonder why. Regarding the questions,
the White House official told News Nation last week, the
White House would have no visibility into anything and nothing
to do with decisions allegedly made by other entities also
would point you to these remarks from Comer and post
from Oversight. Epstein's accountant is now the fifth witness to
tell the committee that President Trump was not involved. God,
these people are so pathetic. That's what this whole committee
is about. This whole committee is a gigantic bj for
President Trump. I hate to be so crass, but that's
what it is. You know. He pulled Comer aside and
was like, listen here, Jimmy boy, go out there and
make sure that I come out of this looking good.
And that's why he hates Thomas Massey so much, by
the way, because Massey wasn't having it, and he knew
that this was going to be nothing more than political theater,
so he got involved with the discharge petition. And now
Comer and the GOP officials that are sitting on this
committee are being exposed, and frankly, at this point it
seems like the only ones who care are Thomas Massey
and Nancy Mace. But the rest of them, they can't
be bothered to try and find the truth. All they
can do is try and protect the President and the administration.
A source familiar within Dyke's deposition told New Nation that
in Dyke said he was never contacted or interviewed by
law enforcement regarding Epstein or Glenn Maxwell, the deceased financier
as co conspirator who is serving twenty year federal prison
sentence for the sex trafficking of minor females. Never even
spoke with Indyke. How can this be a real investigation
if that never occurred. How can anyone sit here and
tell me that this was fully investigated. Everybody was looked at,
every angle was checked. If guys like Darren Indyke weren't
even questioned, save the bullshit, save the nonsense, and miss
me with all of it. In Dyke and Cohn were
listed as beneficiaries in a January ninth, twenty seventeen email
about one of Epstein's financial trusts, referred to as the
Butterfly Trust. In Dyke reportedly began to work for Epstein
around nineteen ninety six. Had no idea, never saw anything
in all those decades. Imagine believing that bullshit connin Endyke
reached a thirty five million dollars settlement on behalf of
the sex traffickers estate in a victim class action suit.
Their attorney, Daniel H. Wiener, perfect name for him, by
the way, said in a statement in February that the
settlement is not an admission of guilt. No, of course not.
We're just paying out thirty five million because you know,
it's fun, because they did nothing wrong. The co executors
were prepared to fight the claims against them through to trial,
but agreed to mediate and settle this lawsuit in order
to achieve finality as to any potential claims against the
Epstein estate. Wiinner said, Yeah, so they can get their money.
Remember they're the executors. They're the ones that are on
the line to get whatever money's left over. So yeah,
they're gonna fight tooth and neel. Indyke's lawyer, Wiener, provided
his client's opening statement via email to News Nation on
Thursday to the House Committee and stated he had no
knowledge whatsoever of Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoings. In his statements, Indyke
said that as the co executor, he helped create the
Epstein Victim Compensation Program to provide a voluntary and non
confrontational means to compensate women who suffered sexual abuse by
mister Epstein. Yeah, right. You wanted a streamline process that
was not going to break the bank. So that's why
you did what you did. And I think that whole
entire settlement fund turned out to be a gigantic slap
in the face to a lot of the survivors. Due
to the court ordered confidentiality restrictions the court approved protocol
for the Epstein Victim Compensation Program and agreements with individual claimants,
the Epstein estate is prohibited from providing that information. However,
any claimant who receives an award under the estate funded
EVCP or indirect settlement with the estate is free to
publicly share that information, Wiener told News Nation. Jess Michaels,
the survivor of sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein eighteen ninety one,
told News Nation the fund has a strict legal process
where victims had to present evidence and go through and
interview process with a claims administrator who was also an attorney.
Evidence included affid David's medical records, therapy notes. The victims
who were paid from the settlement fund had been determined
to have truthful allegations of harm by Epstein and his network,
not just proximity to his network. She said, so if
they made the payout, that means that Jane do four
was abused and they're tacitly admitting it. So now the
question becomes, what's up with Trump? And how come there
hasn't been a full investigation of what Jane do four said?
And of six hundred million, the victims only received one
hundred and twenty five million, even after a USVII judge
had told the fund and a state no limits were
to be put on survivor compensation. Michaels also said, and
I said that from the jump that shit has gone,
these women should have got the lion's share of this
money back the brink struck up and pile that money
up on their front lawn. Nobody else should be getting
this money, not the USVII, not anybody. Anybody who was
victimized by Jeffrey Epstein should get this money. And the
younger you were when the victimization happened, the more money
you should get. But unfortunately that did not occur, and
the estate is still sitting on a gigantic amount of money.
And I know it's just a gigantic coincidence that the
people that are set up to get that money when
all this is over and done with, are Indyke and
con So yeah, I would say that they have some
motivation here to settle these suits for as little as
possible so that they can come out on the back
end with a gigantic bag, and as far as Jane
Doe for goes. If that settlement was paid, then of
course that leads to a bunch of questions about what
she said about Donald Trump, because if she was credible
enough to get a settlement, shouldn't that mean that she's
credible enough for at the very least a real investigation
into the allegations that she made. And if not, then
the DOJ should provide us information as to their decision
making and why they decided not to investigate. So I
think that this has the potential to really blow up.
Will it. We'll have to see what the documentation says,
but it has that potential, and just like the rest
of the stories we're following, will continue to follow this
one as well. All of the information that goes with
this episode can be found in the description box.