Speaker 1: O bed of this are.
Speaker 2: Are and welcome to the show.
Speaker 3: This is the Cult of Conspiracy and my name is Jonathan,
Speaker 3: I'm Jacob and today we are going to be covering
Speaker 3: quite a lot.
Speaker 2: We're going to be getting into what's.
Speaker 3: Going on in the world, all the crazy things that
Speaker 3: have now transpired and leading up to Trump getting into
Speaker 3: the White House. We're going to see, you know what,
Speaker 3: he's really going to be stepping into all the wild
Speaker 3: things across the world.
Speaker 2: But first, before we do.
Speaker 3: I did want to give a major shout out to
Speaker 3: Danny Gohler. He is an absolute stud if you've seen
Speaker 3: on Instagram or any any of the social media's. He
Speaker 3: has put together a movie slash documentary of his discovery
Speaker 3: and it's actually called the Discovery of his Discovery of
Speaker 3: what happened to him one day whenever he was on
Speaker 3: DMT and he decided to get the bright idea to
Speaker 3: shine a laser up on a wall. And what happened
Speaker 3: whenever he was able to see possibly inter dimensionally, it
Speaker 3: was the wildest matrix looking shit that anybody has ever
Speaker 3: really put eyes on. And as a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: earlier today, Sean and I ended up having Danny on
Speaker 3: meta mysteries, and we were able to interview him about
Speaker 3: this very documentary. It was freaking awesome. Electro Nick was
Speaker 3: there as well, and as a matter of fact, Jacob,
Speaker 3: this is gonna trip you out, dude. How about on
Speaker 3: the show with the guy that made this documentary? Right
Speaker 3: on the show Electro Nick Live sparks up DMT, looks
Speaker 3: into the laser and sees exactly what he's talking about.
Speaker 1: Wait, Nick did DMT. I thought he hadn't touched that
Speaker 1: in years.
Speaker 2: He did it for this show.
Speaker 4: Wow.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he went all the way in and it was
Speaker 3: freaking awesome. So highly recommend all of the good cult
Speaker 3: members to go check out that episode. If this is
Speaker 3: what you're interested in, If you're somebody who thinks that
Speaker 3: we live in a hologram or a simulation or a matrix,
Speaker 3: it's very well possible that spirituality and science have finally
Speaker 3: crossed fingers and decided to hold hands. And so what
Speaker 3: we're gonna do right here is we're gonna play the
Speaker 3: video of the trailer of the Discovery. It's like four
Speaker 3: or something minutes long and just a little a little
Speaker 3: shot out. So if you're interested in this, come check
Speaker 3: it out on meta. Well, let's stop pussy footing around
Speaker 3: and get to the video.
Speaker 5: I remember things very vividly from a very young age.
Speaker 5: When I was a little kid, I actually spent a
Speaker 5: lot of time with my grandparents. My grandfather was a
Speaker 5: nuclear physicist. I remember he was telling me about.
Speaker 1: Black holes.
Speaker 6: And that terrified me.
Speaker 2: I was like, that's just mind boggling.
Speaker 6: It's a monster, right, But at the same time, it
Speaker 6: fascinated me, and I said to myself, how do we
Speaker 6: know that this unthinkably massive thing. I realized that nature
Speaker 6: and keep secrets. It's only a matter of do we
Speaker 6: understand what tools can we use to expand our knowledge?
Speaker 6: And for me, Dimonthol Triplane also known as DMT, was
Speaker 6: the tool that led me to the discovery.
Speaker 7: When I first saw the phenomenon, it was like holy shit.
Speaker 5: But then it was actually like whoa, what is happening?
Speaker 7: Am I losing my mind? But then I showed other
Speaker 7: people and things kept getting weirder.
Speaker 1: For the record, I haven't told him anything.
Speaker 5: Okay, just tell me what you see.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, come on.
Speaker 8: Oh my god, fuck, holy shoot.
Speaker 9: I just saw something.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, what the fuck? Oh I've seen that?
Speaker 1: I feel it. I've been under the influence of mind
Speaker 1: altering substances a lot, but I've never seen anything like that.
Speaker 3: WHOA.
Speaker 6: I showed over one hundred people and I kept asking myself,
Speaker 6: how are all of us seeing the same thing?
Speaker 1: Oh my god?
Speaker 2: It changed in shapes right there.
Speaker 6: The laser was revealing numbers and letters running in a pattern.
Speaker 8: Remembers like this big here, and.
Speaker 1: It looked like code.
Speaker 7: It looked like programming code.
Speaker 10: It's definitely saying something and I just wanted to take
Speaker 10: a picture of it conslated.
Speaker 9: Wow, you see that?
Speaker 2: Okay, So yeah, it's not stuck. No, it's not because
Speaker 2: it's a lot. No, it's on its own side. Light
Speaker 2: is just the way reviewing it, and each angle.
Speaker 8: Shows you different layers, different ways through it.
Speaker 2: I could see through the wall.
Speaker 1: It's not like a hallucination.
Speaker 2: It has spatial awareness and permanence.
Speaker 9: I don't know WHOA.
Speaker 7: For centuries, man kind is attempted to explore these psychedelic
Speaker 7: altered states, but we've never had a repeatable, testable phenomenon
Speaker 7: to observe until now.
Speaker 5: It's you can see through the laser into another dimension.
Speaker 7: I mean, like take yourself to that. Like I just
Speaker 7: made a connection and nobody made before, which is a
Speaker 7: simple connection. The claiming is if you project a diffracted
Speaker 7: laser on the surface and you smoke the MPT, you
Speaker 7: will see code running in.
Speaker 11: Surfaces, yes, like in the matrix.
Speaker 1: So there are a few possibilities.
Speaker 11: One, I lost my mind, which is the coolest losing
Speaker 11: your mind ever in history. The second option is that
Speaker 11: this is the biggest discovery of humankind if anybody ever
Speaker 11: asked themselves what it would be like to know you
Speaker 11: live in the matrix for sure?
Speaker 7: Well, I know for sure, I'm convinced.
Speaker 12: So where do we go from here?
Speaker 1: All I know is it's about to get crazy?
Speaker 3: All right, Jacob, your thoughts on this crazy thing that
Speaker 3: is going on.
Speaker 4: So everybody who was in the video just now looking
Speaker 4: at the red lights, they were under the influence of DMT.
Speaker 3: Correct, Yeah, you kind of have to be in order
Speaker 3: to see what he's looking at. But the thing is
Speaker 3: is that it's not like people are smoking DMT and
Speaker 3: then looking into the laser and everybody's seeing all kind
Speaker 3: of crazy, different, weird shit. Everybody's seeing the same exact
Speaker 3: thing I'm talking about, like mechanical gears, the same exact
Speaker 3: like what he was trying to describe as maybe it's
Speaker 3: like not exactly like Chinese language or you know, ancient
Speaker 3: Egyptian language or something like that, but that's just the
Speaker 3: best way he would was able to describe the symbols
Speaker 3: that he was seeing, and they were each able to like,
Speaker 3: each person was able to depict those exact things. It's
Speaker 3: almost like going out and looking at the night sky
Speaker 3: and being like, oh, look there's the Big Dipper, and
Speaker 3: everybody was able to see that within this code.
Speaker 1: Right, Okay, I'm with you, with you, I'm very this
Speaker 1: is interesting.
Speaker 4: Very I'm not gonna I would love to see different
Speaker 4: types of laser, different color. I saw the used green.
Speaker 4: At least in one of those videos there was at
Speaker 4: least a green light being used. I would be curious
Speaker 4: if the symbols changed with different light spectrums. I would
Speaker 4: be very curious if everybody could draw the exact same symbols.
Speaker 4: And I don't mean like within artistic flare, Like you
Speaker 4: know what I'm saying, as far as like the symbols go.
Speaker 4: It like a seven looks like a seven pretty much
Speaker 4: across the board.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter who wrote it.
Speaker 4: You see what I'm saying, Like those types of symbols
Speaker 4: that code, and I'm not like trying to throw shade
Speaker 4: at it in any way. I'm saying I would genuinely
Speaker 4: love to see the notes on those experiments, but it
Speaker 4: seems fascinating.
Speaker 3: Well, and what's really cool too, is that what he
Speaker 3: was saying, as far as you know our show that
Speaker 3: we had with him over on Meta Mysteries, he was saying,
Speaker 3: it's not necessarily that like that you're seeing all.
Speaker 2: This stuff.
Speaker 3: Because of the the angle of the laser or the
Speaker 3: color of the laser. You can move it up and
Speaker 3: down and you're still seeing the same thing. It's just
Speaker 3: that the laser is the way it's like, the laser
Speaker 3: is what is kind of unveiling it.
Speaker 4: So that was one nice question so that I kept
Speaker 4: hearing him say you could look through it. They weren't
Speaker 4: saying like you could see transparently through the door. They're
Speaker 4: saying you could look past its physicality and see like
Speaker 4: the code that makes up the door or did I misunderstand.
Speaker 3: Yes to both, I think so you can literally see
Speaker 3: what he is claiming is is that you can see
Speaker 3: the coding of what makes up our reality, just like
Speaker 3: in the matrix with the ones and zeros. However, with this,
Speaker 3: it's not just ones and zeros. It's symbols. And you know,
Speaker 3: we talk about symbology and stuff like that, and you
Speaker 3: look at certain symbols and they they hold just an
Speaker 3: immense amount of data within each little symbol. You know,
Speaker 3: we always make like the joke of like whenever you
Speaker 3: look at the McDonald's golden arches, like you think of
Speaker 3: the McNuggets and the French fries and the big Mac
Speaker 3: and the quarter pounder, like all these things are encompassed
Speaker 3: in this one symbol. And I think that the same
Speaker 3: thing is to be said with the symbols that they're
Speaker 3: seeing inside of whatever, like like portal opening is going
Speaker 3: on right here, and what they're saying is is that
Speaker 3: not only are you just seeing something that's like up
Speaker 3: against the wall, like as far as the coating, it's
Speaker 3: that it has depth. It looks like it has infinite
Speaker 3: depth through the wall that you're shining the laser on.
Speaker 1: Interesting.
Speaker 3: Yeah, really wild and very fascinating guy to talk to, like,
Speaker 3: very knowledgeable and is actually I think you would actually
Speaker 3: enjoy talking to him too, because he's more of the
Speaker 3: scientific mind.
Speaker 2: He was trying to.
Speaker 3: Figure out every possible way, like because he was like, look,
Speaker 3: i want this to be true so bad, but I'm
Speaker 3: gonna try and do every possible thing that I can
Speaker 3: to disprove it. Like I want to disprove it because
Speaker 3: if I can be disproved, then there's not really a
Speaker 3: whole lot for me to be excited about.
Speaker 2: But if I can't.
Speaker 1: Disprove it footable here, what could be disproven?
Speaker 4: That everything is made up of tiny molecules that we
Speaker 4: can't see like that, I think that's pretty well understood, right.
Speaker 3: But of gears and symbols and depth to our reality
Speaker 3: that we didn't know was there, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3: So very very fascinating and really cool. He was actually
Speaker 3: just on the Danny Jones podcast like two weeks ago, and.
Speaker 1: I'll bring them one on the cult that could be.
Speaker 3: Fun, might have to I got his phone number now,
Speaker 3: Hell yeah. So I just want to throw that out
Speaker 3: for any of the good cult members out there that
Speaker 3: might be interested in like learning about if if our
Speaker 3: reality is a matrix, this might be the episode for you.
Speaker 3: So that episode, I believe is going to be coming
Speaker 3: out on Monday. So I think this episode that we're recording,
Speaker 3: right now is actually going to be going out Friday,
Speaker 3: So give it over the weekend and it'll be coming
Speaker 3: out on Monday.
Speaker 2: If you're interested in that kind of.
Speaker 1: Stuff, Hell yeah, dude, I'm gonna tune in. That sounds
Speaker 1: fun as though.
Speaker 2: Hell yeah.
Speaker 3: All right, now, let's get back to cult things. And
Speaker 3: we have recently discovered that Joe Biden has pardoned his son.
Speaker 3: After all the times that everybody said, including himself, including
Speaker 3: Karine Jean Pierre, I mean, every single time it has
Speaker 3: been mentioned, it's always been seen as such a ludicrous question.
Speaker 3: I can't believe you're asking me this. Why would I
Speaker 3: pardon my son? He's not above the law rights?
Speaker 4: Why are people shocked? Everybody does this? Trump did this.
Speaker 4: Everybody pardons their their you know, constituents and cronies and
Speaker 4: hooks their.
Speaker 1: People up on the way. Everybody thought Trump.
Speaker 4: Was gonna throw Killery in jail because he dropped that
Speaker 4: line during the campaign.
Speaker 1: It's like he would have pardoned her anyway, y'all.
Speaker 3: I think it's just the fact of everybody is just
Speaker 3: now remembering the politicians are not to be trusted, and
Speaker 3: you can't trust a single damn word that comes out
Speaker 3: of their mouth.
Speaker 1: And I guess this is blake.
Speaker 4: This is flagrant, right, this is blatant in your face,
Speaker 4: because you're right. For the past few months they have
Speaker 4: been saying up and down that he wasn't going to
Speaker 4: do this, and then did it like two weeks after,
Speaker 4: you know, or two weeks before he gets out office,
Speaker 4: just on the slick slick nobody sees that, and it's like.
Speaker 1: Bro, what.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, the first time that it was mentioned to
Speaker 3: Karine Jean Pierre, which is the press secretary, is the
Speaker 3: White House lady right there? Yeah, she's the White House
Speaker 3: Press secretary. What's her name, Kareine Jean Pierre. All right,
Speaker 3: she's always the one that's seen like people put like
Speaker 3: clown makeup on her face.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I didn't. I recognized her face. I wouldn't have
Speaker 4: been able to name her name. I certainly wouldn't have
Speaker 4: been able to guess that name. Not gonna lie, but
Speaker 4: uh yeah, that's the that is one of the most
Speaker 4: people that have ever.
Speaker 2: Been oh yeah yeah.
Speaker 3: And and to be honest, I kind of felt bad
Speaker 3: for her because she had to cover up so much
Speaker 3: bullshit and she kind of was the face that you know,
Speaker 3: all the press would come in and ask her every
Speaker 3: single question that the president was never actually asked by
Speaker 3: the press itself.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she had to defend sleepy Joe for years.
Speaker 4: Like y'a actually shouts out, like your girl was trying
Speaker 4: to carry the whole fucking team, knowing, damn good and
Speaker 4: well the ship is sinking.
Speaker 1: She was over here trying to bail out water to
Speaker 1: the very end.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, dude, I mean, some people need a wind screen.
Speaker 3: She had to be a shit screen. And I mean
Speaker 3: I'm sure, Misa, she caught a lot of it to
Speaker 3: the dome, There's no doubt about that. Unfortunately, she had
Speaker 3: a very tough job.
Speaker 4: Is it even possible to dodge that being his fucking
Speaker 4: press secretary?
Speaker 3: Look, I mean, like a screen on a window is
Speaker 3: not going to block every piece wind, you know what
Speaker 3: I'm saying.
Speaker 4: I mean, like, name anybody who could have stepped into
Speaker 4: the role of Joe Biden's press secretary and like done
Speaker 4: well Trump, Like I maybe that would be hilarious. He
Speaker 4: just would have shit on him the whole time. The
Speaker 4: press is why did Joe Biden do this? What can
Speaker 4: I say? I worked for a fucking moron, Like.
Speaker 2: I worked for a loser.
Speaker 3: So let's jump all the way back to the first
Speaker 3: time it was mentioned, back in twenty twenty three. September
Speaker 3: of twenty twenty three, it says, after Hunter was indicted
Speaker 3: on federal charges for making false statements and unlawfully possessing
Speaker 3: a firearm, Jean Pierre again addressed the possibility of Biden
Speaker 3: pardoning his son, and she goes, so, I've answered this
Speaker 3: question before.
Speaker 2: It was asked of me not too.
Speaker 3: Long ago, a couple of weeks ago actually, and it
Speaker 3: was very clear, and I said no. So she's getting
Speaker 3: pissed that the question is even being brought up at
Speaker 3: that point.
Speaker 2: That's the second time.
Speaker 1: I answered it already. The answer is no.
Speaker 2: Flash forward.
Speaker 3: A couple months later, December of twenty twenty three, Jean
Speaker 3: Pierre gave a more detailed answer to reporters after Hunter
Speaker 3: faced nine criminal charges in a federal tax evasion case.
Speaker 2: She goes, nothing has changed.
Speaker 3: That is still the case, Jean Pierre said whenever she
Speaker 3: was asked whether Biden would pardon Hunter. She goes, I mean,
Speaker 3: the President has said this before and I will continue
Speaker 3: to say, which is that he loves his son and
Speaker 3: supports him as he continues to rebuild his life, and
Speaker 3: I'm going to be really careful to not comment on
Speaker 3: this and refer to the Department of Justice or my
Speaker 3: colleagues at the White House Council. But that's what I'm
Speaker 3: going to. She goes, But that's what I'm going to.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to go beyond telling you all what
Speaker 3: the President has said over and over again. He's proud
Speaker 3: of his son and he's building back his life. So
Speaker 3: kind of just like.
Speaker 2: Force Field put up the shield. Wow, fast forward.
Speaker 1: Dean charges nine charges of tax evasion.
Speaker 4: That's the one thing that Uncle Sam will absolutely throw
Speaker 4: your ass in jail for.
Speaker 3: Fast forward to June twenty twenty four, just earlier this year.
Speaker 3: Many months later, Biden himself said that he would not
Speaker 3: pardon his son and he would accept the results of
Speaker 3: his son's federal trial during an interview with ABC's David
Speaker 3: Muir in Normandy, France. After the interview, Jean Pierre reiterated
Speaker 3: Biden had no intention of pardoning his son and had
Speaker 3: not spoken to the President on the matter. She goes, Yeah, So, look,
Speaker 3: as I said it at the top, I don't have
Speaker 3: anything to say beyond.
Speaker 2: To your first question.
Speaker 3: Beyond what the President's statement was yesterday. He has been
Speaker 3: very clear. We have been very clear. You know, he
Speaker 3: loves his son, and he and the First Lady love
Speaker 3: their son, and they support their son. I just don't
Speaker 3: have anything certainly beyond that, Jean Pierre said, and then
Speaker 3: when pressed, she added, Look, what I'm saying is, what
Speaker 3: I'm saying is that the president I the prep and
Speaker 3: then she's like stuttering here and she goes, I have
Speaker 3: not spoken to the President about this, And what I'm
Speaker 3: saying is is what what was asked about a pardon?
Speaker 3: He was asked about He was asked about the trial specifically,
Speaker 3: and he answered it very clearly, very forthright. As we know,
Speaker 3: the sentencing hasn't even been scheduled yet. I don't have
Speaker 3: anything beyond what the President said. He's been very clear
Speaker 3: about this.
Speaker 1: Okay, So yeah, he supports his son. Cool. Cool. No
Speaker 1: one fucking asked about that. Wait, no one asked about that.
Speaker 4: Although I guess pardoning him would be the ultimate support,
Speaker 4: would it not. He's facing nine federal income tax charges.
Speaker 4: Let's not even go near his employment with Parisma. Let's
Speaker 4: not go near the sex trafficking charges. Let's not go
Speaker 4: near the bag of crack that was found in the
Speaker 4: foyer of the fucking White House.
Speaker 1: Let's just bypass all that for two seconds, All right,
Speaker 1: Let's go.
Speaker 3: Cut forward to August of twenty twenty four, after Biden
Speaker 3: had withdrawn from the presidential race. One reporter asked John
Speaker 3: Pierre whether he would tell Vice President Kamala Harris to
Speaker 3: not pardon his son if she were elected. She goes,
Speaker 3: I mean, that's a hypothetical that I look the president,
Speaker 3: I can speak for the president, and he said he
Speaker 3: would not pardon his son, And I'm just going to
Speaker 3: leave it there. She said, say that in August. Okay,
Speaker 3: here we are in December. Pardons yep, pardons of so.
Speaker 3: And it turns out so that was allegedly around six
Speaker 3: times that she confirmed that he would not be pardoned.
Speaker 3: And turns out there's a little bit of a scuttle
Speaker 3: bud that's going on within the news right now. Some
Speaker 3: people are upset, of course, the Republicans are.
Speaker 4: The news is a scuttle bud, Dude, that's gossip. Yeah,
Speaker 4: basically these days is fucking tabloid gossip.
Speaker 1: I've learned it's ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Well, what they're saying is is that basically, look, obviously
Speaker 3: the Republicans are going to be a little upset about
Speaker 3: this because he's a fucking lying liar, right, but what
Speaker 3: do you expect out of a career politician? And also
Speaker 3: the Democrats are actually pretty upset about this as well,
Speaker 3: because he broke his word and how could the almighty
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, your sweet grandpa Joe ever tell you a lie?
Speaker 2: How could he do that?
Speaker 1: But now what.
Speaker 4: They're all look shitty too because he speaks on behalf
Speaker 4: of that entire party, So it makes them all look
Speaker 4: like snakes in the grass, which further record they already did.
Speaker 4: They already fucking did. But now again it's blatant, it's
Speaker 4: in our faces with it.
Speaker 3: Well, now what's going on is is that you got
Speaker 3: all these news outlets, MSNBC, CNN, name your mainstream media channel.
Speaker 3: They're all saying, actually, it's a good thing that Joe
Speaker 3: Biden pardoned his son, So they're trying to manipulate the
Speaker 3: minds of everybody. Everybody was split on this decision, Republicans, Democrats,
Speaker 3: almost everybody was like, no, we don't approve of this.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, fifty percent of the people
Speaker 3: that polled on this thing, fifty percent said that they
Speaker 3: don't approve, and it was only like I think like
Speaker 3: thirty two percent that did approve on this, which is
Speaker 3: basically his presidential approval rating.
Speaker 2: Anyway, Wait, wait.
Speaker 1: Wait, I've seen this movie before, just a few months ago.
Speaker 4: Hold on, there was the entire left was like shitting
Speaker 4: all over fucking cameltoe hit left, right, and centered.
Speaker 1: Then all of a sudden, she is so qualified. It's
Speaker 1: her turn. It's her time.
Speaker 4: Remember that whole phase change that happened in like it
Speaker 4: was almost a complete one week turnaround of these people
Speaker 4: clowning on her to them idolizing her, and then out
Speaker 4: of nowhere, like a record setting one hundred and ninety
Speaker 4: million or some fucking ridiculous number of donations came in
Speaker 4: from nowhere. I remember that. And then they're just doing
Speaker 4: it again. Right, It's like, oh, we love Joe. He
Speaker 4: would never he was not gonna pardon him. Listen him
Speaker 4: pardoning his son was for the betterment of the American society.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, clearently that was why, Like, bro, what is this?
Speaker 3: And now they're gonna be telling us about how much
Speaker 3: joy is in Hunter Biden.
Speaker 2: That's really what the that's what it's gonna be.
Speaker 4: They're gonna start spitting in that, you know what, going
Speaker 4: to war would really be good for your sons and daughters.
Speaker 2: Most of them are already saying.
Speaker 4: That the children yearn for the warfare, they yearn for
Speaker 4: the front lines and the coal mines.
Speaker 3: Clearly, yeah, yeah, that's pretty much what it is. And
Speaker 3: so you can see the absolute mk ultra that is
Speaker 3: going on around the country literally on a daily basis
Speaker 3: at this point. Anybody who is like nightly tuning in
Speaker 3: to watch the two or three hour news program and
Speaker 3: they're like, oh, I can't believe that hunter Biden got
Speaker 3: fucking pardon Joe said that he wasn't gonna do it,
Speaker 3: and I put all my faith in Joe Joe, and
Speaker 3: every then you got Don Lemon and Rachel Maddow saying.
Speaker 2: Well, hold on, it's okay.
Speaker 3: It's actually a good thing, because you know, Trump was
Speaker 3: just gonna go after him, and Biden was just Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: He was just.
Speaker 2: Protecting his son. Wouldn't you protect your son? And and
Speaker 2: and then all the.
Speaker 4: People get like a loving father narrative. That's all it is.
Speaker 4: He's a loving father.
Speaker 3: Meanwhile, Joe was pimping out his crackhead son to a
Speaker 3: fucking other country.
Speaker 2: That's what he was doing.
Speaker 4: Let's not even talk about the Ashley Biden diaries, or
Speaker 4: his first son dying, or his wife or the second
Speaker 4: son too, and then all of that. Then when he
Speaker 4: was actually confronted, you remember that. Do you remember early
Speaker 4: on in his campaign against Trump, somebody asked him about
Speaker 4: his son and the drug usage and all that, and
Speaker 4: he like snapped at him and was like, listen, my
Speaker 4: son has been through a lot, and I am proud
Speaker 4: of my son where he's gone, where he's come from,
Speaker 4: and bah bah bah up and like defended him and
Speaker 4: on some real levels, on some homie shit. I had
Speaker 4: a little bit of respect for Joe at that moment, like, Yeah,
Speaker 4: your son is absolutely a drug addict. He's absolutely the
Speaker 4: piece of shit's come of the earth whatever. But you
Speaker 4: know what, that's your son, and no one's gonna talk
Speaker 4: shit about your son like that while you're a president.
Speaker 4: And then for a fucking second there I was like, yeah, Joe,
Speaker 4: I I see you. And then for his son to
Speaker 4: take that that public his dad going to bat for
Speaker 4: him publicly so many fucking times, to the tune of
Speaker 4: President of the United States. Okay, it's not like him
Speaker 4: coming to bail you out from the local county sheriff. Dude,
Speaker 4: fucking president is going to bat for you, and you
Speaker 4: leave bags of coke in the fucking White House.
Speaker 1: Like at that point, it's like, okay, so fuck you.
Speaker 4: Like your dad's literally giving you how many literal get
Speaker 4: out of jail free cards, and you're still fucking up
Speaker 4: at that point. Look, you're a grown man. You're not
Speaker 4: some twenty something year old still figuring your shit out.
Speaker 4: You are a grown ass man, and your dad is
Speaker 4: probably gonna be dying here in the next six months.
Speaker 2: Well that no, fuck him.
Speaker 3: That little dimebag that was found in the White House
Speaker 3: was I mean, a lot of people were saying that
Speaker 3: it was Joe Biden's, but there was a White House
Speaker 3: insider that is claiming that it was allegedly Kamala's.
Speaker 1: I refuse.
Speaker 4: I could believe Kamala. I could believe Kamala pretty easily. Honestly,
Speaker 4: There's no way I could believe that that bag of
Speaker 4: any illicit substance belonged to Sleepy Joe. I'm I'm sorry,
Speaker 4: no way has that man touched Kakaina in in probably
Speaker 4: a decade dude, he is so asleep right now.
Speaker 3: And well and unless he's on like a debate stage,
Speaker 3: Let's look, he was putting he was putting sentences together
Speaker 3: at least.
Speaker 1: Oh shit, you think they gave him a little a
Speaker 1: little snoop and tooting on the way to the fucking
Speaker 1: microphone when he was going against Trump.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, they gave him. They gave him up your
Speaker 2: car And I'm being ship right there, Dude. That was
Speaker 2: not lace with bacon soda. That was the real shit.
Speaker 1: A little bit of that Columbia art and powder.
Speaker 3: Okay, Oh yeah, baby, there's so many cool names for coke.
Speaker 3: I wish that I can come up with him on
Speaker 3: the spot, like you two, bug dude, buger sugar.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Anyway, So all right, so now you're saying, oh, okay,
Speaker 3: of course Joe Biden is going to pardon his son.
Speaker 3: What if you were the president of the United States
Speaker 3: and you had unlimited amount of power and your son
Speaker 3: was about to be facing crazy amounts of jail time
Speaker 3: mainly because of your doing, and so you kind of
Speaker 3: feel a little, uh, you feel like you have to
Speaker 3: do something to be able to get him out of
Speaker 3: that hole. Yes, is he a crackhead.
Speaker 4: Okay, you can't say feel guilt. We know he didn't
Speaker 4: feel that, but feels something right.
Speaker 2: Something you would hope that he feels something.
Speaker 3: Well, let's take it all the way back to I
Speaker 3: believe the late eighties whenever Joe Biden was in a
Speaker 3: courtroom and he was talking about what we should do
Speaker 3: if anybody who is caught with crack.
Speaker 4: Dude, have you watched those videos of him when he
Speaker 4: was a young politician, a young thirty something year old
Speaker 4: in DC.
Speaker 2: He was a whipper snapper.
Speaker 4: The shit he was saying, literally as he was even
Speaker 4: taking that office, was shitting when the American public.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he's always looked at everybody like he was
Speaker 2: above them.
Speaker 4: Oh my god, that's why you put me in this
Speaker 4: position as a thirty seven year old man. Is because
Speaker 4: I'm obviously smarter, and you want me to go to
Speaker 4: bat for you, and I'm speaking on behalf of my constituents,
Speaker 4: and obviously I know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: I I I mean me.
Speaker 4: Me, son, son Son, You're not even forty. Sit down,
Speaker 4: let the grown folks talk.
Speaker 3: Okay, Yeah, yeah, I'm I'm actually surprised that he didn't
Speaker 3: have some kind of throat issues, you know, up into
Speaker 3: his uh you know, into his late ages, because.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't surprise you because you don't choke on Chinese dick,
Speaker 4: Like I feel like that could fit in his mouth
Speaker 4: pretty easily.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he go to whether you're choking on Chinese dick
Speaker 3: or your own dick. I mean that that kind of anyway.
Speaker 2: Let's let's go back, and let's go back. I mean,
Speaker 2: he probably has a little dick too, let's just be honest.
Speaker 1: But I mean, look, maybe he's hung like a horse.
Speaker 1: Maybe he can suck his own dick.
Speaker 4: I know that there's no way he'll ever have a
Speaker 4: sore throat from shucking off Jiju Ping or any of
Speaker 4: the other pandas that's for goddamn sure.
Speaker 1: He's been doing that since at least the early nineties.
Speaker 3: No, he would just never have gum disease because he
Speaker 3: was able to floss correctly sucking that little dick. But
Speaker 3: uh right, so all right, let's go back and watch
Speaker 3: this video.
Speaker 13: Here a piece of crack cocaine no bigger than this
Speaker 13: quarter that I'm holding in my hand, one quarter of
Speaker 13: one dollar.
Speaker 1: We passed the.
Speaker 14: Law through the leadership of Senator Thurman and myself and others.
Speaker 13: A law that says you're caught with that, you go
Speaker 13: to jail for five years. You get no probation, you
Speaker 13: get nothing other than.
Speaker 1: Five years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice.
Speaker 14: Under our forfeiture statues, you can the government can take
Speaker 14: everything you own, everything from your car to your house,
Speaker 14: your bank account. Not merely what they confiscate in terms
Speaker 14: of the dollars from the transaction that you've just got
Speaker 14: caught engaging in. They can take everything. I don't care
Speaker 14: why they've become a sociopath. We have an obligation to
Speaker 14: coording them off from the rest of society. They are
Speaker 14: in jail, away from my mother, your husband, are families,
Speaker 14: so I don't want to ask what made them do this.
Speaker 14: They must be taken off the.
Speaker 1: Street, youfully said, Joe.
Speaker 2: I mean, I couldn't agree more.
Speaker 4: For the record, if anybody would like to see that
Speaker 4: instead of just watching, because the entire time that old
Speaker 4: Joe is speaking on that, next to it, there was
Speaker 4: a video of his son sparking up a crack pipe
Speaker 4: and showing it on the scale and all of that,
Speaker 4: So if anybody would like to see it rather than
Speaker 4: just here Jonathan tell them where they can go.
Speaker 3: You can confine us at patreon dot com slash Cult
Speaker 3: of Conspiracy podcast or rockfan dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy.
Speaker 3: Both of those links are downstairs in the bio over there.
Speaker 3: What you'll have access to is you'll be able to
Speaker 3: join us if you sign up for the Third Eye
Speaker 3: all the way open to here on Patreon, you'll be
Speaker 3: able to join us every Tuesday night at nine pm
Speaker 3: Central Time for the live Cult Member show, which is
Speaker 3: then posted just the next day. But if you would
Speaker 3: like to be involved in that, asking any kind of
Speaker 3: question and just kind of you know, more familiar with
Speaker 3: the family, and you'll be able to have conversations with
Speaker 3: even I mean, you'll be able to have conversations even
Speaker 3: with the spirit animal who doesn't want to have a
Speaker 3: conversation with the spirit animal, Samuel.
Speaker 2: So you'll be able to have conversations with everybody.
Speaker 3: And it's and it's kind of like a big Thanksgiving
Speaker 3: literally every Tuesday night, and we appreciate all of the
Speaker 3: good cult members who have already done so. And also
Speaker 3: you'll be able to have access to every show a
Speaker 3: day or two in advance, sometimes three, and it's completely
Speaker 3: commercial free.
Speaker 2: We cannot stress that enough.
Speaker 3: I know that people are getting just completely but heard
Speaker 3: about commercials.
Speaker 2: It is a pain in the ass.
Speaker 3: I'm not even judging you for getting pissed about the commercials.
Speaker 3: That's why we have Patreon, and you don't need to
Speaker 3: sign up for the Third Eye all the way up
Speaker 3: in tier to be completely commercial free. On Patreon, we
Speaker 3: have a five dollar tier and the only thing that
Speaker 3: you won't be able to do is just join us
Speaker 3: on the Tuesday Night Live. So if you want to
Speaker 3: sign up for that way, then you still get the
Speaker 3: shows a couple of days in advance. You still be
Speaker 3: able to have direct access of messaging me and Jacob,
Speaker 3: and you'll still be supporting the show in the best
Speaker 3: way that you can.
Speaker 2: So we appreciate all the good cult members who have
Speaker 2: done so already.
Speaker 1: Cannot stress that enough anyway.
Speaker 3: Anyhow, all right, so there is one more or two
Speaker 3: more things that I really wanted to show here, and
Speaker 3: this is kind of going to be a great overview
Speaker 3: of what are if k how he's looking at the
Speaker 3: situation with Russia and Ukraine, and why his insight is
Speaker 3: going to benefit Trump and really just all of America hopefully.
Speaker 2: Preventing fucking World War three.
Speaker 3: I know you say that it's not gonna happen, But
Speaker 3: if even the chance is a one percent chance, I
Speaker 3: think that having RFK and his insight into this whole situation,
Speaker 3: how it all works, I think that even that one
Speaker 3: percent chance would go down to zero as long as
Speaker 3: he's involved in these conversations, which I do believe that
Speaker 3: he would be.
Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, well, I would love to hear what he's
Speaker 1: got to say about it.
Speaker 15: Bro.
Speaker 2: Let's see, there's a war that should have never happened.
Speaker 9: It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on
Speaker 9: terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine, and I's
Speaker 9: the major thing they wanted was for us to keep
Speaker 9: NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors want
Speaker 9: to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why
Speaker 9: then that country has to conform its military purchases the
Speaker 9: NATO weapons specifications, which means certain companies North are grumming
Speaker 9: razy on General Dynamics, blowing and Lockheed get a trapped mark.
Speaker 9: To March of twenty twenty two, we committed one hundred
Speaker 9: and thirteen billion dollars. Just give you an example, we
Speaker 9: could have built a home for almost every homeless person
Speaker 9: in this country. We then committed another twenty four billion
Speaker 9: since that two months ago, and now President Biden's asking
Speaker 9: for another sixty billion. But the big, big expenses are
Speaker 9: going to come after the war, when we have to
Speaker 9: rebuild you all the things that we destroy. Mitch McConnell
Speaker 9: was asked and we really afford to spent one hundred
Speaker 9: and thirteen billion to Ukraine. He said, don't worry, it's
Speaker 9: not really going to Ukraine, is going to America and
Speaker 9: defend nine o'clock. So we just admitted it's a money
Speaker 9: laundering scheme. And who do you think owns every one
Speaker 9: of those companies? Blackrock? So Tim Scott during the Republican
Speaker 9: debate said, don't worry, it's not a gift to Ukraine.
Speaker 9: It's alone. Raise your hand if you think that that
Speaker 9: loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah, of course it's hot.
Speaker 9: So why do they call it alone? Because if they
Speaker 9: call it alone, they can impose loan conditions. And what
Speaker 9: are the loan conditions that we impose on number one
Speaker 9: of extreme austerity program, So that if you're por in
Speaker 9: Ukraine and you're going to be poored forever. Number two
Speaker 9: most important, Ukraine has to put all of its government
Speaker 9: owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all
Speaker 9: of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe.
Speaker 9: In Ukraine, there's been a thousand years of war fought
Speaker 9: over that land. Is the richest foreign land in the world,
Speaker 9: is the bread basket of Europe. Five hundred thousand kids
Speaker 9: almost ukraine Cans have died to keep that land is
Speaker 9: part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about the
Speaker 9: long condition. They've already sold thirty percent of it. The
Speaker 9: buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Montsantum. Who do you think
Speaker 9: owns all of those companies? You got Blackrock. And then
Speaker 9: in December President Biden gave out the contract to rebuild
Speaker 9: Ukray And who do you they got that contract?
Speaker 14: Blackrock.
Speaker 9: So they're doing this right in front of us. They
Speaker 9: don't even care that we know anymore, because they know
Speaker 9: that they can get away with it. And how do
Speaker 9: they know that because they have it a strategy, and
Speaker 9: that strategy is an old, old strategy, which is they
Speaker 9: keep us at war with each other, they keep us
Speaker 9: hating on each other. They keep the Republicans and Democrats
Speaker 9: fighting each other, black against white and all these divisions
Speaker 9: that they sew.
Speaker 2: I mean, was that not laid out perfectly?
Speaker 4: Yes, and there was some discrepancies that I saw. I
Speaker 4: agree with his overarching theme. I agree with why this
Speaker 4: war is actually happening. It is for the military industrial
Speaker 4: complex to eat. The war machine has to eat. It
Speaker 4: doesn't like being stopped. So this one hundred percent with you,
Speaker 4: the contracts for all that was going to us manufacturing,
Speaker 4: and that it's a whole money lungering thing, like a
Speaker 4: hundred percent. This is how wars are fought these days.
Speaker 4: I will say that the money that was sent to
Speaker 4: Ukraine that wasn't dollars, some some was, and yes we
Speaker 4: need to talk about that one hundred percent, but a
Speaker 4: lot of that was like equivalent value towards military weapons
Speaker 4: and munitions. Again, those are like those high mars that
Speaker 4: if we didn't give to them in about ten years,
Speaker 4: we would have been paying more money to like dismantle
Speaker 4: them properly and shit. So like that's one small little thing.
Speaker 4: But yes, his overarching theme as to the how and
Speaker 4: the whys and the who's in the what now, I'm
Speaker 4: not saying Ukraine is also the most fertile soil on Earth.
Speaker 4: I'm saying it's the most fertile area between those two
Speaker 4: nations and in the Eurasian step. Like, that's a true statement.
Speaker 4: It is the bread basket of Europe, and that's not
Speaker 4: a joke. Those three companies that bought that out DuPont, Cargill,
Speaker 4: and Monsanto.
Speaker 1: That's a chemical company.
Speaker 4: That's a food company, and that is a fertilizer company. Okay,
Speaker 4: now the chemical company there, there's different things DuPont does.
Speaker 4: Some of that's paint, some of that's oil and chemical
Speaker 4: and stuff like that, and some of that is also
Speaker 4: in the agricultural pesticide GMO style industry as well. Right,
Speaker 4: So I used to work for one of those three.
Speaker 4: Not gonna go there, but the company I worked for
Speaker 4: was owned by one of those three.
Speaker 1: And it goes like that in the industry, right, Like
Speaker 1: if you work for a.
Speaker 4: Oil, you know, refining company, you probably work for a
Speaker 4: subsidiary of one of the big three of the oil
Speaker 4: you know what I mean. But anyway, those three company's
Speaker 4: coming in and buying out thirty percent of Ukraine's farmland.
Speaker 4: That is a that's a bit of a red flag.
Speaker 1: Not gonna lie. It's very similar to the red flag of.
Speaker 4: Bill Gates solo owning most of the farmland in America.
Speaker 1: It's a bit of a fucking red flag.
Speaker 3: Right, And I guess the problem here is is that, look,
Speaker 3: Russia is always gonna do Russian shit, like it's always
Speaker 3: been that way.
Speaker 2: They've always kind of went to the beat of their own.
Speaker 3: Drum, like if they want something, they're gonna try and
Speaker 3: go after that, which was the initial reason why NATO
Speaker 3: was even created in the first place, was to hold
Speaker 3: them back and not allow them to take over any
Speaker 3: other like old Mother Russia territories, right, And and that
Speaker 3: was supposed to be dismantled after a little while. But
Speaker 3: but but NATO keeps on getting bigger. And so the
Speaker 3: one of the main things that they agreed to was
Speaker 3: that what NATO and Russia agreed to like was like,
Speaker 3: look like, just don't don't take Ukraine because then we're
Speaker 3: really just going to be absolutely surrounded. And if you
Speaker 3: take Ukraine, then we're gonna have an issue. Well that's
Speaker 3: kind of what's been in the works here for the
Speaker 3: little while. And so I'm not gonna sit here and
Speaker 3: try and you know, uh, put put Russia or Putin
Speaker 3: on a pedestal. I'm not that kind of guy, but
Speaker 3: but you can kind of see that the fan has
Speaker 3: been flaming. The flame has been fanning anyway, you know,
Speaker 3: the fucking the flame's getting bigger because somebody's blowing on it.
Speaker 3: And the people that are blowing on it are not Russia,
Speaker 3: it's not Ukraine, it's not even necessarily NATO.
Speaker 2: It's these these these big.
Speaker 3: Military contractors that stand to benefit off of war. And
Speaker 3: what else happens whenever you benefit off of war is
Speaker 3: that you have then the contractors that go into Ukraine
Speaker 3: after it's been completely decimated and they have all the
Speaker 3: money to then rebuild it in their own way, and
Speaker 3: so then it becomes a complete like corporate uh takeover.
Speaker 3: And and that's just you know, kind of what's going on.
Speaker 3: And it's sad to see it, but you know, and
Speaker 3: that's just what our he was saying.
Speaker 2: He goes, Look, they don't care that you know it.
Speaker 3: They're fucking bigger than you, Like you're you're an aunt.
Speaker 3: You're not gonna do anything that they don't care if
Speaker 3: you know about this shit, which is just sad especially
Speaker 3: whenever you got Black Rock and all these you know, uh,
Speaker 3: military industrial complex corporations and everything like that. Like these
Speaker 3: these things are like they're massive compared to any individual.
Speaker 3: So that's why they don't care if you talk about it.
Speaker 3: They don't care if they get gone through.
Speaker 1: So here's the deal with NATO.
Speaker 4: Agreed, NATO was formed to combat the Soviet Union and
Speaker 4: the threat of communism. Right the Soviet Union collapsed, it
Speaker 4: ended in the early nineties. NATO should have ended then
Speaker 4: and there. Right, there was no need for the Allies
Speaker 4: of Nations in this way with that with that intention, right, No,
Speaker 4: the mission statement has been completed. Can kind of end
Speaker 4: this fundraiser now if you will.
Speaker 1: Right, But here's the thing.
Speaker 4: What was discovery later on was that having multiple nations
Speaker 4: all using the same type of equipment benefited all of
Speaker 4: us very greatly. And what I mean by that is,
Speaker 4: and I understand that it's towards the globalized side of things,
Speaker 4: but here's the deal. For instance, coalition forces in Afghanistan,
Speaker 4: there was other people than just the United States there.
Speaker 4: Britain had people there, New Zealand had people there, Australia
Speaker 4: had people there, Canada had people there. France, Germany, multiple
Speaker 4: Allied nations sent forces into Afghanistan, some even in Iraq.
Speaker 4: So what we found is, whenever we have these joint
Speaker 4: operations going on, it benefits everybody if we're all firing
Speaker 4: the same caliber round just for instance, so that if
Speaker 4: and when something went really tits up, we could borrow
Speaker 4: rounds from France, who are literally too tents over, you
Speaker 4: know what I mean. Or Canada we can use their
Speaker 4: strip to load our magazines. Now that's a very very
Speaker 4: micro example, but you do that to the macro. You
Speaker 4: talk about fuel lines, you talk about shipping equipment, trucks, planes.
Speaker 4: Now I'm not saying that everything is a perfect apples
Speaker 4: to apples comparison, but we discovered that for logistics purposes,
Speaker 4: having more countries all use the exact same thing really
Speaker 4: benefited us when the time came.
Speaker 3: I mean, that does make sense, Like you would want
Speaker 3: to be able to make sure that your specific gun
Speaker 3: has the specific bullets that it needs to shoot, and
Speaker 3: it's nice knowing that there's an abundance of that for sure.
Speaker 4: Which is why like the five five six NATO that's
Speaker 4: what that's called, right, the civilian equivalent blah blah, blah
Speaker 4: two two three. It's the same exact round, but one
Speaker 4: of them is the metric caliber, i e.
Speaker 1: The NATO caliber.
Speaker 2: That's all it is, Okay, okay, well either way.
Speaker 3: The point that he's trying to make there is that,
Speaker 3: you know, look at it in this sense, the World
Speaker 3: Health Organization and big pharma. Just use that as an example.
Speaker 3: If everybody on this planet was healthy, we wouldn't need them, right,
Speaker 3: They're not going to keep on bringing in all that money.
Speaker 3: They need sick people to survive, right, like, like just
Speaker 3: like you can see how that's a real thing, right
Speaker 3: like how they purposely keep us sick.
Speaker 4: The military industrial complex needs war and I get that,
Speaker 4: So that that's the problem.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: So in theory, the NATO thing, this allied nation's all
Speaker 4: having the same type of stuff for logistical reasons. This
Speaker 4: makes sense on paper, right, and like that was the intent.
Speaker 4: But NATO itself should have been shut down. A new
Speaker 4: organization can be spawned, one that Russia could have been
Speaker 4: brought in on. For instance, now that the Soviet Union's
Speaker 4: done and everything's dead and everything's now capitalist and it's
Speaker 4: all good. As a way of showing a good sense
Speaker 4: of faith, maybe even invite them to the fucking table.
Speaker 2: I don't know which.
Speaker 3: By the way, Putin has tried to reach out to
Speaker 3: NATO and see if he could join, and he was
Speaker 3: turned down.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's my problem with it.
Speaker 4: NATO should have been shut down because their mission statement
Speaker 4: never went away and.
Speaker 3: They need they need a boogeyman to make all their
Speaker 3: money off of.
Speaker 4: But it also doesn't help that when you look at
Speaker 4: which three nations just shot out of a cannon?
Speaker 1: Actually know, I'll give you four.
Speaker 4: Four nations that just shot out of a cannon are
Speaker 4: like the enemies of the Western world pretty much have
Speaker 4: been for the last century, pretty much will be for
Speaker 4: the next century.
Speaker 1: Just can you name those four?
Speaker 3: Russia, okay, Iraq, Iran, An, Afghanistan, No, what, No.
Speaker 4: For the last decades. Bro, I'm not talking about where
Speaker 4: is a war zone? Four big names that you've heard
Speaker 4: on the news since you were a child, Four big
Speaker 4: names that these are.
Speaker 1: Like the enemies of the West. Oh, I'm in China.
Speaker 2: We've gone to war with all those countries though.
Speaker 4: Hold on, dude, North Korea, Okay, that's an epic bad guy.
Speaker 1: Ooh, boogeyman. Russia, Oh my god, they're so scary Russia.
Speaker 4: Oh Iran, Oh my god, they're extremists in China. Those four,
Speaker 4: if you notice, are also weirdly always in alliance with
Speaker 4: each other.
Speaker 1: That doesn't help anybody's fucking case.
Speaker 4: Whenever they're like, that's not us, man, Yo, Let me
Speaker 4: get some of them weapons and some of those troops
Speaker 4: over here China.
Speaker 1: Yo. Let me get this North Korea. Ya yo, that's
Speaker 1: not us though, Like it doesn't help, bro.
Speaker 3: You have to form allies though, whenever you got the
Speaker 3: entire world going up against you. So I'm not gonna
Speaker 3: say that anybody's right or wrong. I'm just gonna say
Speaker 3: I understand the reach out for outside help whenever you
Speaker 3: got all guns pointed at you.
Speaker 1: Nah, I get that too. You gotta find friends where
Speaker 1: you can get.
Speaker 3: Them, right, right, So, speaking on behalf of Russia and
Speaker 3: everything that's gone on, I would love to go into
Speaker 3: this video right here that actually your boy Brandon Kroll
Speaker 3: posted on Instagram, and you know he always brings the receipts.
Speaker 3: And this is kind of the history of NATO and
Speaker 3: Russia ever since Mother Russia was brought down.
Speaker 2: So let's just see what is going on here. It's
Speaker 2: actually pretty interesting.
Speaker 15: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in
Speaker 15: the way that we are told every day. This started
Speaker 15: in nineteen ninety. February ninth, nineteen ninety.
Speaker 3: By the way, anybody who's listening to this, this guy
Speaker 3: is he is an economist, and it just brought it
Speaker 3: up there for a second, but he was basically saying
Speaker 3: that it's not the whole war in Russia is not
Speaker 3: what we think that it is. This guy's name is
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Sachs. He's an American economist and a professor at
Speaker 3: Columbia University. He's not just some Joe Schmoe. He's somebody
Speaker 3: that actually studies this kind of shit. And so just
Speaker 3: keep that in mind. I just don't want people thinking
Speaker 3: that this is just some nobody.
Speaker 1: From the Rockefeller system of education.
Speaker 4: Sure, sure now, but I actually, I actually do put
Speaker 4: respect on names of people like that that are actually
Speaker 4: work working in the field.
Speaker 1: For sure.
Speaker 2: I'm just talking shit right right, So here we go.
Speaker 15: February ninth, nineteen ninety, James Baker, the third Our Secretary
Speaker 15: of State, said to Mihail Gorbachev, NATO will not move
Speaker 15: one inch eastward if you agreed to German unification. Basically
Speaker 15: ending World War Two, and Gorbachev said, that's very important. Yes,
Speaker 15: NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German unification. The
Speaker 15: US then cheated on this already, starting in nineteen ninety four,
Speaker 15: when Clinton signed off on a basically plan to expand
Speaker 15: NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the
Speaker 15: so called neocons took power, and Clinton was the first
Speaker 15: agent of this, and the expansion of NATO started in
Speaker 15: nineteen ninety nine with Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic. At
Speaker 15: that point Russia didn't much care. There was no border
Speaker 15: other than with the Kerningsburg, but other than that there
Speaker 15: was no direct threat. Then the US led the bombing
Speaker 15: of Serbia in nineteen ninety nine. That was bad, by
Speaker 15: the way, because that was a use of NATO to
Speaker 15: bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to
Speaker 15: break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much,
Speaker 15: but Putin became president.
Speaker 1: They swallowed it.
Speaker 15: They complained, but even Putin started out to pro European
Speaker 15: pro American actually asked maybe we should join NATO when
Speaker 15: there was still the idea of some kind of mutual,
Speaker 15: respectful relationship. Then nine to eleven came. Then came Afghanistan,
Speaker 15: and the Russian said, yeah, we'll support you, we understand
Speaker 15: to root out terror. But then came two other decisive actions.
Speaker 15: In two thousand and two, the United States unilaterally walked
Speaker 15: out of the Anti Ballistic Missile Treaty. This was probably
Speaker 15: the most decisive event never discussed in this context, but
Speaker 15: what it did was trigger the US putting in missile
Speaker 15: systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire
Speaker 15: direct threat. In two thousand four five, we engaged in
Speaker 15: a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in two
Speaker 15: thousand and nine yanikoviych won the election and he became
Speaker 15: president in twenty ten on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine.
Speaker 15: That calmed things down because the US was pushing NATO,
Speaker 15: but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't
Speaker 15: even want to be in NATO. They knew that the
Speaker 15: country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian ethnic Russian.
Speaker 1: What do we want with this?
Speaker 15: We want to stay away from your problems. So in
Speaker 15: February twenty second, twenty fourteen, the United States participated actively
Speaker 15: in the overthrow of Yanikovich, a typical US regime change operation,
Speaker 15: have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us
Speaker 15: a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Newland,
Speaker 15: my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and the
Speaker 15: US Ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piat, who is a senior
Speaker 15: State Department official till today, and they talked about regime change.
Speaker 15: They said, who's going to be the next government? All
Speaker 15: of this is to say the US then said, okay,
Speaker 15: now NATO's really going to enlarge, and.
Speaker 9: Putin kept saying stop.
Speaker 15: You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been by the way,
Speaker 15: I forgot to mention in two thousand and four, Estonia, Lavia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Speaker 15: seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And
Speaker 15: then okay, it's a long story. But the US kept
Speaker 15: rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border
Speaker 15: in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems.
Speaker 15: After breaking a treaty twenty nineteen, we walked out of
Speaker 15: the Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty. On December fifteenth, twenty twenty one,
Speaker 15: Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement.
Speaker 15: You can find it online. The basis of it is
Speaker 15: no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next
Speaker 15: week after that, begging them take the negotiations. Putin's offered something,
Speaker 15: avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not going to be
Speaker 15: a war. Announced that NATO's not going to enlarge. Oh,
Speaker 15: don't worry, NATO's not going to enlarge. I said, oh,
Speaker 15: you're going to have a war over something that's not
Speaker 15: going to happen. Why don't you announce them? And he
Speaker 15: said no, No, our policy is an open door.
Speaker 2: This is Jake Sullivan.
Speaker 15: Our policy is an open door policy, open door for
Speaker 15: NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit. By
Speaker 15: the way, you don't have your right to put your
Speaker 15: military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world.
Speaker 15: They turned down the negotiations. Then the Special Military Operation
Speaker 15: started and five days later, as Olenski says, okay, okay,
Speaker 15: neutrality and then the United States and it's written and said,
Speaker 15: no way, you guys fight on. We got your back.
Speaker 15: We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but
Speaker 15: we got your back as we kept pushing them into
Speaker 15: the front lines. That's six hundred thousand deaths now of
Speaker 15: Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kiev to tell them
Speaker 15: to be brave.
Speaker 3: All right, So isn't that interesting? Whenever you start to
Speaker 3: really put a lot of the details together, you can
Speaker 3: see that it's not so easy. Like it's not so
Speaker 3: easy to just say I support Ukraine, I support Russia.
Speaker 2: That's exactly what they want you to do. That they
Speaker 2: want you to support.
Speaker 4: There's there's no good guys here, y'all. There's none to
Speaker 4: be found, I promise.
Speaker 3: You, because it's all controlled like, and they want you
Speaker 3: to pick a side because whenever you pick a side,
Speaker 3: you start a fight with your neighbor. And what happens
Speaker 3: whenever you start a fight with your neighbor, Now all
Speaker 3: all of your attention is on your neighbor and not
Speaker 3: what is going on around the whole damn world. And
Speaker 3: that's how they're taking it over, and that's how they're capitalizing,
Speaker 3: and that's how they keep on dividing because hey, dude,
Speaker 3: all we want is just fucking bread and circus, right,
Speaker 3: and they're literally feeding it to us on a daily basis,
Speaker 3: whether it's in sports, whether it's in media, whether it's
Speaker 3: in Hollywood, whether it's in the music industry, whether it's
Speaker 3: on the news, whether it's Republican or Democrat or whatever.
Speaker 3: They just want us at odds so that we are
Speaker 3: not looking here look over there.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent percent.
Speaker 4: Just tell you this though, bro, there's a reason like
Speaker 4: this whole the expansion of NATO was going on for years, Okay,
Speaker 4: Putin moving into Ukraine just in the timing that he did,
Speaker 4: Like keep in mind, he moved into crime Mea in
Speaker 4: twenty fourteen. Like this wasn't like it was just out
Speaker 4: of nowhere and nobody saw this coming either. But yes,
Speaker 4: to the point of the professor, NATO did expand even
Speaker 4: after a promise that it wouldn't. And yes, the US
Speaker 4: was pushing that charge. And again I'm not trying to
Speaker 4: excuse those actions, but he's right. The neocons are where
Speaker 4: that started. Clinton started this, Bush continued it, Obama drive
Speaker 4: it further. Trump stopped it, and he wasn't playing by
Speaker 4: the neocon rules, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of the whole point. So as soon
Speaker 1: as Trump left office.
Speaker 4: Next thing, you know, we have a whole war on hands. Yeah,
Speaker 4: it's crazy, the timing of it all, you.
Speaker 3: Know, Well, that's what they wanted the entire time. That's
Speaker 3: ultimately why they didn't want him going back into the
Speaker 3: White House. I mean, they could give a shit less,
Speaker 3: you know what the effect it has on the American
Speaker 3: economy and all that other kind of shit, that's that's
Speaker 3: peanuts compared to global money.
Speaker 2: Like, it's peanuts compared.
Speaker 3: To global change that you're going to be making and
Speaker 3: the takeover of certain regions of the world and being
Speaker 3: able to fund and all that. It's it's just it's
Speaker 3: very convoluted. But I just wanted to show that it's
Speaker 3: not so cut and dry. It's ugly every single which
Speaker 3: way you look, and it's especially ugly by the fucking puppeteers,
Speaker 3: those puppeteers that are like, oh, look, Zelinsky has something
Speaker 3: to say to putin. Here's Trump, he has something to
Speaker 3: say to everybody else, And here's Jizja Ping and King
Speaker 3: Jong Un and all your different leaders. Boris Johnson, which
Speaker 3: he's not there anymore, but like all these different leaders,
Speaker 3: they are all puppets. They're just faces for us to hate,
Speaker 3: which is ultimately I believe why Russia is still being
Speaker 3: treated the way that they are because they are a
Speaker 3: good face. They have that Russian accent. Everybody knows to
Speaker 3: hate that. You've been fucking mk ultraed to look at
Speaker 3: somebody Russian or hear a Russian accent and instantly assume
Speaker 3: that they're the bad guy. It's so ingrained within our
Speaker 3: brains to look at Russia. And I'm not saying that
Speaker 3: they're good guys by any means. I'm just saying, who
Speaker 3: is kind of pushing that narrative to allow us to
Speaker 3: think that kind of shit in the first place. That's
Speaker 3: what I like looking into. I like looking in of
Speaker 3: the psychology behind all of this kind of stuff, and
Speaker 3: you just got to look at it and be like, yo,
Speaker 3: are we literally being manipulated on this whole thing? Are
Speaker 3: we being so manipulated that how many people literally want
Speaker 3: a war? They want certain regions to be turned to glass.
Speaker 3: They want civilians with you know, with families and children,
Speaker 3: and those children are going to school and they're hoping
Speaker 3: to get an education, and the parents are going to
Speaker 3: work and they're trying to provide for their fucking families.
Speaker 2: But meanwhile, we got fucking privileged little douchebags over here
Speaker 2: that are.
Speaker 3: Going to you know, they're they're they're logging in online
Speaker 3: and they're seeing tiktoks and they're they're they're seeing what,
Speaker 3: you know, whatever, their their wing is telling them to believe,
Speaker 3: and it's like.
Speaker 2: Yeah, ice them, ice them, dude.
Speaker 3: It's like you fucking moron doing a little bit of research, Like,
Speaker 3: maybe we shouldn't ice everybody. Maybe I don't want to
Speaker 3: be turned to glass. Do you ever think about that?
Speaker 3: Nobody ever thinks about Like we always think that we're
Speaker 3: just so protected, we got we got amazing America, and
Speaker 3: and we're always the most badass and that is true
Speaker 3: to a sense, or like it is kind of true,
Speaker 3: very true, But that that doesn't mean that the rest
Speaker 3: of the world is dehumanized compared to us.
Speaker 1: No, no, it doesn't. And that's the thing, bro.
Speaker 4: I think that this entire thing was only started and
Speaker 4: it's probably gonna end soon because Trump is about to
Speaker 4: take office.
Speaker 1: And I think that it's not even because oh oh.
Speaker 4: God, the man's coming. We have to we have to
Speaker 4: act right. I don't even think it's that. I think
Speaker 4: it's because they know that he will end this shit.
Speaker 4: And so now all of a sudden, right about this time,
Speaker 4: they're starting to talk about ceasefire things out of nowhere.
Speaker 4: Certain groups are talking about maybe drawing lines, maybe calling
Speaker 4: it off, calling it quits. So I brought this little, uh,
Speaker 4: this little video here from sky News. And I'm not
Speaker 4: saying that I agree or disagree with anything, because, like
Speaker 4: I've said from day one, I support the Ukrainian fighters
Speaker 4: on Ukrainian soil, defending their soil from foreign invaders.
Speaker 1: That's where my loyalty has always been.
Speaker 4: Not towards Zelenski, not towards Ukrainian government, not towards Putin,
Speaker 4: not towards Russian government, not even towards the United States government.
Speaker 4: I've supported homebies on the front lines that are trenching
Speaker 4: in for their home soil.
Speaker 3: I know you've you've said that all along and I
Speaker 3: and I'm not even coming at you.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying no, no, not you, dude.
Speaker 4: I got people shitting on me from my opinions on Putin,
Speaker 4: and it's like, y'all, keep in mind, I say shit
Speaker 4: on Trump all the time, and people are like, oh,
Speaker 4: you think that Russia is so bad?
Speaker 1: What about the CIA? Bro? How many times have I
Speaker 1: talked about the CIA, Like.
Speaker 2: How many episodes have we done it on this CIA?
Speaker 4: What I'm saying, bro, Like, I'm not shitting one way
Speaker 4: or another, If anything, I'm pointing the finger in all directions.
Speaker 1: We equal opportunity in this motherfucker.
Speaker 2: Oh, by the way, before.
Speaker 3: We go on with this video, I did want to
Speaker 3: mention one other thing recently, as actually earlier today as
Speaker 3: of time of recording. You remember the Russian arms dealer
Speaker 3: whenever we sent him back to Russia.
Speaker 2: What was his name?
Speaker 13: Uh?
Speaker 2: That wasn't Victor Bout, was it?
Speaker 1: Yeah? About right? Yeah?
Speaker 2: About that?
Speaker 3: Well, Victor Bout actually went onto Info Wars with Alex
Speaker 3: Jones earlier and he says he said that the Russian
Speaker 3: he's a allegedly a Russian military expert. Now obviously he
Speaker 3: was a Russian armstealer. But he went on to Alex
Speaker 3: Jones and he said that he's warning everybody over here
Speaker 3: that the globalists are trying to start a nuclear war
Speaker 3: before Trump takes office on January twentieth.
Speaker 4: Well, as that's that's very possible, I just don't see
Speaker 4: it really happening. I see a whole lot of saber
Speaker 4: rattling as there typically is with these types of people.
Speaker 1: Not from Victor Balt.
Speaker 4: I'm talking like from the politicians and from the leaders
Speaker 4: of the world. They always beat their chests in saber rattle,
Speaker 4: but who knows.
Speaker 3: I feel like I would be more likely to believe
Speaker 3: something out of his mouth because he's kind of in
Speaker 3: the thick of it.
Speaker 4: I would be more inclined to believe him over most.
Speaker 4: I'm not trying to negate his warning by any means.
Speaker 4: I just can't see it happening because I see that
Speaker 4: being bad for business for everybody. It's not even about
Speaker 4: pride or ego at that point. That's bad for everybody,
Speaker 4: for every front.
Speaker 1: And I don't think.
Speaker 4: That the you want to say, the shadow government of
Speaker 4: the ones in charge, or even the lower level guys
Speaker 4: that we quote unquote elected into office. I don't think
Speaker 4: that anybody would actually be like yep, now's the time.
Speaker 4: I just I can't see it.
Speaker 3: Maybe, I mean, you're talking about literally corporations and governments
Speaker 3: that have more money than God, and you're talking about
Speaker 3: like we talked about Ukraine and what RFK was talking
Speaker 3: about earlier, how they're like they're really like okay with
Speaker 3: funding this whole war, because they're also the ones that
Speaker 3: are in charge of rebuilding Ukraine and making it completely
Speaker 3: their land and completely funded by them. And if you
Speaker 3: move over there, well, now, it's not so much that
Speaker 3: you would necessarily like maybe not in a literal sense,
Speaker 3: but you wouldn't necessarily be a citizen of Russia. You
Speaker 3: would almost be a citizen of fucking black Rock, which
Speaker 3: is kind of crazy.
Speaker 4: So with that mind, let's hear at least their opinion
Speaker 4: on Sky News of what they think a truce deal
Speaker 4: might look like.
Speaker 9: From the head of Neta Marcrisy as well as the
Speaker 9: Prime Minister.
Speaker 4: Are we getting closer to seeing the contours the word
Speaker 4: said someone mindn't know.
Speaker 16: Yeah, I mean, I'm not sure if we're going to
Speaker 16: see the contours of a deal anytime soon. But what
Speaker 16: we are seeing is everyone's preparing for the fact that
Speaker 16: this will be different next year, I mean into next year,
Speaker 16: after Christmas, into the spring, however long it may take.
Speaker 16: The dynamics of this war are going to be different
Speaker 16: because the politics on the outside are different, and most
Speaker 16: people believe that we are heading towards some sort of
Speaker 16: truce or ceasefight. It certainly won't be a peace deal
Speaker 16: because there's almost no way you can make peace between
Speaker 16: what Russia wants in Ukraine's ability to stay alive. As
Speaker 16: they always say, it's very hard to negotiate with somebody's
Speaker 16: trying to kill you. So we'll see some sort of
Speaker 16: maybe a truce, maybe a ceasefire. And what the Western
Speaker 16: allies are saying is that we want to give Ukraine
Speaker 16: as much leverage as and when that takes place. But
Speaker 16: what the outlines of a deal could be. I mean,
Speaker 16: everyone's got ideas, and I could give you half a
Speaker 16: dozen different ideas now, But where it's going to go
Speaker 16: when President Trump elect present Electron becomes president, nobody knows.
Speaker 16: And of course he keeps I mean, one of his
Speaker 16: sources of power is that he keeps people frightened of
Speaker 16: him and frightening of his unpredictability. And in a way,
Speaker 16: that is a strength. It wears off after a few years,
Speaker 16: I have to say, but I mean, for now, his
Speaker 16: unpredictability is some sort of source of strength. So he's
Speaker 16: got everybody running around trying to come up with things,
Speaker 16: and that gives them options to play with. And so
Speaker 16: we're talking about some sort of freezing of the front
Speaker 16: line somewhere, and then some sort of way of securing
Speaker 16: that truce, that cease fire so that it doesn't break
Speaker 16: down within six months or a year.
Speaker 9: What does that look like in that eventuality that you can.
Speaker 16: Have as like a very long line, I mean the
Speaker 16: ceasefire line on the line of contact at the moment
Speaker 16: in Ukraine, say from they from north to south. That's
Speaker 16: six hundred miles by one thousand kilometers. So if you
Speaker 16: want to have a demilitarized zone of let's guess fifteen
Speaker 16: miles or twenty kilometers either side of that line, who's
Speaker 16: going to be there? I mean you know which troops?
Speaker 16: Un forces, NATO company, NATO forces almost certainly not, but
Speaker 16: it might be European forces or Western forces. And so
Speaker 16: a line of neutral troops and the idea of being
Speaker 16: maybe European troops not on the NATO's banner, but individually
Speaker 16: as were you know, let's say a brigade of British troops,
Speaker 16: a brigade of German troops, a brigade of French troops
Speaker 16: or whatever, and they would sit along that line and
Speaker 16: dare the Russians to attack them. Now, that's a pretty
Speaker 16: dangerous situation. But that's one way in which you might
Speaker 16: try to stabilize this. If you tried to stay lies
Speaker 16: it through declarations, then nobody would believe them. I mean
Speaker 16: President Putin hasn't stuck to any declaration that he's made
Speaker 16: over defense issues since nineteen ninety nine, so you know,
Speaker 16: declarations won't won't matter. I mean practical things will matter,
Speaker 16: and that's what it might begin to look like. And
Speaker 16: then there's Curse. I mean, the Ukrainians have got this
Speaker 16: little enclave in Curse which they are holding onto. And
Speaker 16: it's interesting little footnote to this. The Russians showed all
Speaker 16: the signs about two or three weeks ago trying to
Speaker 16: mount an attack on Zaparisia to move westwards further south
Speaker 16: in Zaparisia, and they had two divisions of troops ready
Speaker 16: to go, and they had to move them up to
Speaker 16: the Cursk enclave because they weren't doing very well up there.
Speaker 16: The Ukrainians have put more into holding the sixty percent
Speaker 16: of that enclave they've still got, and it actually, although
Speaker 16: the Curse enclave attempt hasn't really worked out the way
Speaker 16: the Ukrainians wanted, it hasn't really relieved pressure in the south.
Speaker 16: But it does seem to have forestalled an attack on
Speaker 16: Zaparisia at least for maybe a month or two months.
Speaker 16: It gives them time to strengthens Uparisia, and they are
Speaker 16: they are digging in like there's no tomorrow around Zaparisia
Speaker 16: now to try to protect it better for something after Christmas.
Speaker 9: Maybe, of course Kursk is whether it's North Koreans are.
Speaker 16: And ten thousand North Koreans were in Kursk, and if
Speaker 16: it's if that is successful as an experiment, to be
Speaker 16: a lot more North Koreans there before too long, it's
Speaker 16: in Ukraine's interest to try to make life as uncomfortable
Speaker 16: as possible for the North Koreans to make sure that
Speaker 16: the experiment fails.
Speaker 4: All right, So I've brought up that concept before of
Speaker 4: a long ass DMZ very similar to what's going on
Speaker 4: with North and South Korea, And we will get to
Speaker 4: them in just a moment, But real quick, what are
Speaker 4: your thoughts about that if they were to wrap that
Speaker 4: shit up right around Christmas time, get some sort of
Speaker 4: a hard line defense set up and just everybody chills
Speaker 4: for a second, and then that chill for a second,
Speaker 4: just kind of stays chilled, and everybody just kind of stops,
Speaker 4: and nobody calls it off. Nobody won, nobody lost, but
Speaker 4: everybody just kind of just kind of stops and it
Speaker 4: just stays stopped.
Speaker 3: And I think that sounds like a hope and a prayer,
Speaker 3: to be honest with you. And I mean, whenever he
Speaker 3: was talking about, like everybody's worried about what's going to happen,
Speaker 3: whenever Trump, you know, takes office and he becomes more involved,
Speaker 3: and that basically his main strength is the fear tactic
Speaker 3: of you don't know what he's going to do, or
Speaker 3: what he's going to say, what kind of sanctions or
Speaker 3: what kind of military hope, any of that kind of shit.
Speaker 17: Right.
Speaker 4: But I find it interesting when foreign commentators speak on
Speaker 4: American politics like that's their impression of Donnie t like
Speaker 4: they think or that guy thinks that his strongest asset
Speaker 4: is his unpredictability.
Speaker 1: It's like it's it's actually his balls, dude, right, Yeah, they're.
Speaker 2: Just saying that his balls are his wild card.
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm yeah, I could see where he's coming from,
Speaker 4: you know, right, right, that unpredictable kind of shit, and
Speaker 4: obviously you're going to have a bit of unpredictability whenever
Speaker 4: you have a president in office that is not being controlled.
Speaker 3: By the world's elites, right, because if it was the
Speaker 3: world's elites, do you think that they were shaking in
Speaker 3: their fucking boots if Kamala.
Speaker 2: Was going to get president going to be president?
Speaker 3: No, because it was it was going to be carry
Speaker 3: out the plan that we had planned for.
Speaker 1: Like all for another four years.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right, right, So Donnie t taken office, and I
Speaker 3: think that, Look, Trumps has said since since he stated
Speaker 3: that he was going to be running again that if
Speaker 3: he was president, that would be all the wars would
Speaker 3: basically be ended on like the first day that he
Speaker 3: took office. And I happened to believe that because, I mean,
Speaker 3: I don't think that Trump is scared.
Speaker 2: To use whatever he has at his disposal.
Speaker 3: To be honest with you, I don't think that he
Speaker 3: wants war, but I don't think that he's scared to
Speaker 3: do it either, kind of show.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, I just I don't think he's going
Speaker 4: to start one, you know what I mean. I don't
Speaker 4: think that he is going to put America on the
Speaker 4: war path.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 4: I could see him if we were to get attacked
Speaker 4: or something like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I could see him putting us on that way,
Speaker 1: but you.
Speaker 4: See what I don't see him like going over nowhere
Speaker 4: and stirring the pot. I see him as saying that
Speaker 4: that's bad for business.
Speaker 2: Right right.
Speaker 3: However, I think that it's a completely different outlook whenever
Speaker 3: you're talking about Palestine in Israel, though, I think he's
Speaker 3: gonna handle that situation much differently.
Speaker 4: Yeah, remember how I've told y'all time and time again,
Speaker 4: Israel and America are locked in talking about.
Speaker 1: Like locked in blood ties, blood oath shit.
Speaker 4: Okays, as locked in with your homie as you could
Speaker 4: possibly be. That's how America and Israel be. He will
Speaker 4: be until the end of time.
Speaker 2: And we ain't got that kind of relationship with Ukraine.
Speaker 1: We do not. We do not.
Speaker 4: We're cool to him like they they're the kid in
Speaker 4: class that you like, you know him, you know their
Speaker 4: name and shit, and like, yeah, y'all might like cheat
Speaker 4: off each other's test from time to time, but it's
Speaker 4: not like he's coming and sit with you at lunch.
Speaker 1: He's not like that with you.
Speaker 3: But we also are the ones who installed Zelenski as
Speaker 3: president over there in the first place, So maybe that
Speaker 3: relationship is a little bit stronger than say, if it
Speaker 3: was a president who wasn't installed by us.
Speaker 4: I'm not gonna say installed by us. I will say
Speaker 4: if we had.
Speaker 1: A hand in it.
Speaker 4: Sure, a little bit of propaganda. Sure, I'm not gonna
Speaker 4: say that like he's there because of us. That I
Speaker 4: feel like that might be a bit of a stretch.
Speaker 4: He was a popular candidate anyway. Keep in mind, nobody
Speaker 4: in Ukraine was like worried about a war kicking off.
Speaker 4: The crimea thing was years ago, like everybody had thought
Speaker 4: everything was chill for now. He was a movie person
Speaker 4: he was a TV personality, and he people liked him
Speaker 4: and thought he would do well as presidents. He played
Speaker 4: a president on TV. He gottact the president? Hey, why not?
Speaker 4: It was It wasn't seen as some sort of a
Speaker 4: like crazy thing. Ukrainians actually wanted him to take office.
Speaker 4: When they voted for him, shit went sideways because he's
Speaker 4: an actor in a fucking military commander in chief position
Speaker 4: and nobody thought about that beforehand, or somebody did.
Speaker 3: Which is pretty crazy because imagine one of I don't know,
Speaker 3: one of the actors that we've had play a president
Speaker 3: in any kind of movie I always think of, like
Speaker 3: Morgan Freeman. He's played a president in what was the
Speaker 3: name of that movie, white House Down, Lob white House Down.
Speaker 2: I think he was the president, wasn't he?
Speaker 1: Uh No? In Deep Impact he was.
Speaker 3: Okay, Well, I so imagine we love Morgan Freeman's role
Speaker 3: so much as a president in a movie that we're like,
Speaker 3: you know what, I think he would actually do a
Speaker 3: good job. And it's like, hold on, he didn't even
Speaker 3: write the script, you know what.
Speaker 2: I mean, Like he was right, he was. He just
Speaker 2: memorized lines and knew where to walk.
Speaker 1: To that point.
Speaker 4: Jonathan, there was once upon a time a guy named
Speaker 4: or Schwarzenegger who became the governor of California, This very
Speaker 4: exact thing that we are talking about right now. Yeah,
Speaker 4: another one, Jesse Ventura.
Speaker 1: Maybe you've heard of him, Jesse the Governor.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was actually a gangster governor though he was.
Speaker 4: And look, I'm not saying that them being actors made
Speaker 4: them bad political figures. I am just saying that, like, yeah,
Speaker 4: both of those are the same. How about the old Gipper,
Speaker 4: how about old ray gunn dude?
Speaker 2: Ray?
Speaker 4: Yeah, oh, Ronald Ray Gunn Dude, chimp, which for the record,
Speaker 4: you know, people like made him out like he was
Speaker 4: some like super huge less. He was like a bless
Speaker 4: maybe celess actor in his prime.
Speaker 3: He wasn't super popular. No, he's not like if if
Speaker 3: DiCaprio became president.
Speaker 4: No, no, he was not the DiCaprio absolutely.
Speaker 2: Not right right, So I don't know.
Speaker 3: I just find it very weird how it like, and
Speaker 3: totally obvious whenever certain actors and stuff like that get roles.
Speaker 2: And I understand what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Obviously, Donnie T has played in his fair share of
Speaker 3: like movies and TV shows and shit like that. But
Speaker 3: the reason he was able to get those roles is
Speaker 3: because of you know, his history and real estate and
Speaker 3: business and all that other shit.
Speaker 2: He played a big role in the.
Speaker 3: Stock market and also was always conversating about, you know,
Speaker 3: how our government and our military should be handling other
Speaker 3: situations in other countries. So he wasn't just an idiot
Speaker 3: like he had some pretty good insight.
Speaker 4: I think we could make this deal, you and I
Speaker 4: and all of our good cult members. I think we
Speaker 4: can just write out this. Okay, Yes, Donnie T has
Speaker 4: an IMDb account. Okay, fine, fine, fine, here's my deal.
Speaker 4: Has he ever played not himself? He's always been Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And that's my point.
Speaker 4: If he's just being him, then we're not calling that acting. Okay,
Speaker 4: that's like Floyd Mayweather. Him having a cameo in a
Speaker 4: movie as Floyd Maywell. That doesn't make him an actor.
Speaker 4: He was being him on camera, that's it, dude.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm pretty sure Zelensky wasn't President Zelensky in his movie.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, he was an actor actor right like
Speaker 4: he he that was the Ukraine's number one show for
Speaker 4: years before he took office as presidents like no real
Speaker 4: life actor actor Donald Trump has only ever been Donald
Speaker 4: Trump on TV and.
Speaker 3: Like in the w W E Ring Donald Trump, in
Speaker 3: Home Alone, Donald Trump, and I mean some of the
Speaker 3: schools Donald Trump rascals.
Speaker 1: He was playing like Waldo's dad or whatever.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: He never actually say anything just on the phone, You're
Speaker 4: the best son money could buy.
Speaker 1: He never did. He was just being Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, he never went out a character.
Speaker 4: That's not an actor to me, I mean a TV personality. Sure,
Speaker 4: I mean maybe that's a fortune five hundred CEO. That
Speaker 4: is being himself with a camera.
Speaker 1: President. That's all I see it's.
Speaker 3: A little different. It's a little different, for sure. But anyway, look,
Speaker 3: I think that what's going to happen, if there is
Speaker 3: going I don't even I bounce back and forth with
Speaker 3: all this kind of shit.
Speaker 2: But I'm gonna be real with you.
Speaker 4: I'm not empatheticals here, brother, this is the time and place.
Speaker 3: I'm not shocked that you would have your Russian arms
Speaker 3: dealer boy saying that the globalist want world War three
Speaker 3: before Donald Trump takes office. I'm not shocked that that
Speaker 3: is being conversated about.
Speaker 4: Was he sent here to send that message out? Was
Speaker 4: he sent here as a Russian asset to tell the
Speaker 4: world that to saber rattle.
Speaker 3: You can't say that that's not a possibility right right now.
Speaker 1: It could very well be a real threat.
Speaker 4: He could absolutely be speaking with real authority of like dude,
Speaker 4: y'all gotta quit fucking around here, Like this could really
Speaker 4: be real life. It could equal be a David Grush
Speaker 4: speaking on behalf. He doesn't know anything because he wasn't no,
Speaker 4: but somebody told him once upon a time that like
Speaker 4: this is how it's about to be, Like who knows?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, And he's also like an arms dealer.
Speaker 3: He's not like you know, the these big military industrial
Speaker 3: complex spokespersons, right.
Speaker 1: It's a smuggler.
Speaker 4: The movie Lord of War with Nick Cage is based
Speaker 4: off of him. The crazy deals in the middle of
Speaker 4: the jungle, just selling truckloads of a KS to rebel groups.
Speaker 3: That's him, right, right, Yeah, he's so I'm not gonna
Speaker 3: sit here and say that he's a nobody.
Speaker 2: He's obviously very well known, like plugged in right, right
Speaker 2: and all.
Speaker 3: And also like I think that, you know, it is
Speaker 3: pretty interesting that you would be getting transmissions like that
Speaker 3: from Russia, because we also getting similar transmissions from Russia
Speaker 3: from Edward Snowden, who was hiding out in Russia.
Speaker 2: Therefore, minute too he might still be there.
Speaker 1: Actually I think he still is.
Speaker 2: So it's it's not that out of the ordinary. And
Speaker 2: I believe that.
Speaker 3: I believe Edward Snowden, and whenever he was talking about
Speaker 3: you know, security and all that kind of stuff, like.
Speaker 2: I believe that.
Speaker 3: And but also I mean, is was he I think
Speaker 3: I would call him a patriot. He was a fucking whistleblower.
Speaker 3: He was blowing the whistle on the NSA, And no.
Speaker 4: No, I would I would call him a patriot, but
Speaker 4: at the same time, he knows that he's not safe.
Speaker 4: Even if they were to call off the dogs and
Speaker 4: he could leave rushing, go to anywhere else on Earth,
Speaker 4: it doesn't matter, he will he does not believe he
Speaker 4: will ever be safe again, because he knows how deep
Speaker 4: this goes. You might call one group off, that doesn't
Speaker 4: mean your secondary group went home, or the third group
Speaker 4: or any of the other tertiary groups from other countries
Speaker 4: who have no dog in this fight, but they are
Speaker 4: homies of years and owe you a favor, Like.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what the guy that was able to hack the
Speaker 3: the files within the n S say to be able
Speaker 3: to whistle blow and tell you that even if your
Speaker 3: phone is dead, even if your battery is ripped out
Speaker 3: of your phone, the government can still spy on you.
Speaker 3: And that blew my damn mind because I'm like, all right,
Speaker 3: how are they able to still listen in if there's
Speaker 3: no battery? And You're like, oh, there's technology that we
Speaker 3: have no fucking idea. What's going on, bro?
Speaker 4: Think of we just did the episode about that Russian
Speaker 4: group with the poisoning and shit like that. Right, Yep,
Speaker 4: the CIA has done way worse things. They have a
Speaker 4: heart attack gun. And that's just one thing they brought
Speaker 4: to show and tell one day. That is not their
Speaker 4: deepest and darkest of weapons that they have their disposal. Yeah,
Speaker 4: like absolutely, it's no matter where you go, if they
Speaker 4: want you dead, you'll be dead. Russia really wants Snowden alive,
Speaker 4: and Snowden really likes being alive, So it makes sense.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no doubt. But as far as all this.
Speaker 3: Talk of World War III before Trump gets into office,
Speaker 3: I think that if there is going to be a
Speaker 3: World War three, it probably would happen before Trump gets
Speaker 3: into office. Like just way in the odds, even if
Speaker 3: we're talking about one two percent, do you think that
Speaker 3: a World War three possibility is more likely before or
Speaker 3: after Trump is in office?
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's gonna happen.
Speaker 4: It would be very very wise of whoever's trying to
Speaker 4: make something happen here. It'd be very smart for them
Speaker 4: to do it before Trump takes office to where he's
Speaker 4: inheriting this problem. Right for them to do it while
Speaker 4: he's in office, I don't know how that will shake out.
Speaker 1: I think that.
Speaker 4: Say what you want about him, but I think that
Speaker 4: he wouldn't do good backed into a corner, and I
Speaker 4: feel like a country attempting to slap us while he's
Speaker 4: in the White House would absolutely make him feel very
Speaker 4: backed into a corner, very much.
Speaker 1: All eyes are on him.
Speaker 4: And I'm gonna be honest with you, Donald Trump does
Speaker 4: suffer from main character syndrome. However, he actually does have
Speaker 4: on the proper plot armor and he does main character shit.
Speaker 4: So if that was to happen and all eyes were
Speaker 4: on him, that would be really really good for the
Speaker 4: military war machine for about six months. It would eat
Speaker 4: for six months, and it would not be pretty. There
Speaker 4: would be so they would try to put him in
Speaker 4: jail for X, Y and Z thing war crimes and
Speaker 4: this and this, and they would be oh God awful,
Speaker 4: but the situation would get handled really efficiently.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying the fact that they tried to assassinate
Speaker 3: him more than once in the last six months is
Speaker 3: kind of telling that they were really trying to prevent
Speaker 3: this from happening, so much so that they cheated as
Speaker 3: much as they possibly could at the polls and still lost. Yeah,
Speaker 3: So like, think about that. The odds are not in
Speaker 3: the globalist favor. Whenever you're talking about literally the people
Speaker 3: have spoken, and I don't know, But also I do
Speaker 3: want to keep my third eye all the way open
Speaker 3: and say, could this also be part of the plan too?
Speaker 2: I don't know. I want to, like, I want to not.
Speaker 3: Believe in any of this, To be honest with you,
Speaker 3: I feel like a fool for even saying that there's
Speaker 3: any slice of hope. But at the same time, I
Speaker 3: feel like, if there's no hope, my god, it is
Speaker 3: so easy to get black pilled and just say, oh, well,
Speaker 3: what's the use of even going to work. We're just
Speaker 3: gonna get fucking nuked in a month anyway.
Speaker 1: You know what the hope is? What's that hope is
Speaker 1: that this past election. I just saw this little video
Speaker 1: on it here, Bro, Washington State actually turned red? Did it?
Speaker 4: No one actually looked at it because most of the
Speaker 4: numbers didn't come in and the election results just were
Speaker 4: what they were.
Speaker 1: At that point. Bup, bah bup.
Speaker 4: When you look at it by popular vote, Washington is
Speaker 4: red from this last election.
Speaker 2: Did they get the electoral votes from Washington as well?
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. At that point, it didn't matter.
Speaker 4: But you could look at the final map of it
Speaker 4: and it is insane.
Speaker 1: That's the hope. And it's not because yay Trump, it's
Speaker 1: yay people thinking.
Speaker 4: Yay for people thinking for themselves and not just going
Speaker 4: off of what letter is next to someone's name, Like,
Speaker 4: thank god, people are and I'm not even saying that.
Speaker 4: This is like people are finally waking up.
Speaker 15: Yo.
Speaker 4: If that's what the Great Awakening looks like, I'll fucking
Speaker 4: take it.
Speaker 1: It's a lowercase W, but god damn it, it's a W.
Speaker 2: All right, So I'm looking at it.
Speaker 3: No, he didn't actually win Washington State, but he did
Speaker 3: get a lot more votes than people expected.
Speaker 4: So I'm gonna have to pull it up and see
Speaker 4: what it was. The do was just breaking it down.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I got it right here.
Speaker 3: So Kamala on the twelve electoral votes from Washington, and
Speaker 3: she won the popular vote, which was two point two
Speaker 3: million compared to Trump's one point five million. So so
Speaker 3: Kamala got fifty seven percent and Trump got almost forty percent.
Speaker 4: Hold on, I'm gonna find this little videos. It was
Speaker 4: a little short one too, so it wasn't actually I
Speaker 4: think it was a short Yeah, all right, matter fact,
Speaker 4: I'm the.
Speaker 1: Shore the screen.
Speaker 2: Go right ahead, sir.
Speaker 1: I keep forgetting that as an option with this technology.
Speaker 2: Technology is pretty awesome.
Speaker 17: It turns out every state in the nation shifted to
Speaker 17: the right in this last presidential election, except for two
Speaker 17: at least, that's what we thought. Now that almost every
Speaker 17: vote is tally days after the election. It turns out
Speaker 17: Washington State did shift to the right after all.
Speaker 2: So what does that mean?
Speaker 17: In twenty twenty, Donald Trump received thirty eight point seven
Speaker 17: percent of the vote. In twenty twenty four, he gained
Speaker 17: votes to about thirty eight point nine percent. As far
Speaker 17: as swings go, point two percent is about as mini school.
Speaker 9: As you can get.
Speaker 17: Democrats also took a smaller piece of the pie. Fifty
Speaker 17: seven point nine percent of Washington voters chose Joe Biden
Speaker 17: in twenty twenty. This year fifty seven point two percent.
Speaker 14: Four.
Speaker 17: Now, make no mistake, Washington State is still a blue steak.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm misunderstood. I was looking at the map and
Speaker 1: it looked more red.
Speaker 3: But just as far as the numbers go, yeah, I
Speaker 3: mean it did start to swing red in that sense.
Speaker 2: And that's that's pretty awesome, dude.
Speaker 3: It's nice to see that people aren't absolutely brainwashed and
Speaker 3: mk altered by the media that some people are starting
Speaker 3: to wake up. I mean, hell, that's why conspiracy podcasts
Speaker 3: are blown up. That's why conspiracy shows are literally some
Speaker 3: of the most popular things that you can listen to
Speaker 3: on Spotify and Apple podcasts and shit like that.
Speaker 4: Agreed, Agreed, Now, all right, before we move to the
Speaker 4: next topic, let's talk this last little bit about this
Speaker 4: possible truce, possible ceasefire.
Speaker 1: Does it get fed more?
Speaker 4: Does do you know what I'm saying, They're gonna feed
Speaker 4: this bitch more and more and more until the final
Speaker 4: bitter in before he swears himself in. Does he fall
Speaker 4: in line and feed it more? What do you realistically?
Speaker 4: And I know you're not like somebody who's on the
Speaker 4: cutting edge of the geo political world here. You get
Speaker 4: your information from very different sources than I do. So
Speaker 4: I'm not even trying to sway you. I'm very curious
Speaker 4: because we have talked about this from different angles and
Speaker 4: all of these things. What do you think is about
Speaker 4: to happen? Do you see a truce slash ceasefire coming
Speaker 4: in the next few weeks or do you think it's
Speaker 4: gonna get ramped.
Speaker 2: Up for the Ukraine or Israel strictly Ukraine?
Speaker 1: First? MM hmm.
Speaker 3: Do I think that there's going to be a truce
Speaker 3: before Trump takes office?
Speaker 4: You're saying, yeah, hmm, No, okay, so you think that
Speaker 4: they're going to force him to come to the table
Speaker 4: and be the one to make the deal.
Speaker 3: I think if there was ever going to be a truce,
Speaker 3: it has to involve Trump, Otherwise they.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't have let it get to where it is.
Speaker 1: I like it.
Speaker 4: I like it, And you know why I like this
Speaker 4: is because this brings me to the next point here,
Speaker 4: because there is another truce, a ceasefire, a very famous
Speaker 4: one in a place called the Korean Peninsula maybe you've
Speaker 4: heard of it. Between North Korea and South Korea. There's
Speaker 4: a d m Z, a d militarized zone. It is
Speaker 4: pretty much where the ceasefire line was, where the point
Speaker 4: of no more forward progress or egress was being made
Speaker 4: by either side.
Speaker 1: When, like the treaty or not even a treaty, a.
Speaker 4: General ceasefire was called, they were supposed to pick the
Speaker 4: fighting back up.
Speaker 1: It never got started back up.
Speaker 4: Long story short, the Korean War never ended, and even
Speaker 4: still it's not technically ended, but it is it was
Speaker 4: in a decent state of being ended, right and that
Speaker 4: was because of a deal that Donnie T himself made
Speaker 4: his last go round as president. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 4: Donald Trump walked into North Korea being guided by Kim
Speaker 4: Jong himself, which is fucking baller. No president has done
Speaker 4: that since the fifties. That's fucking pimp move.
Speaker 3: Now, he did have to bring Willbarrow with him to Willbarrow,
Speaker 3: his big fat sack end to North Korea with him.
Speaker 4: Bro, I'm telling you, he's got to set a brass
Speaker 4: one sun in the middle of hurricane. He's just out
Speaker 4: there banging them together. Hear me, He's out there making
Speaker 4: a known where he's at. Motherfucker there. But anyway, anyway,
Speaker 4: aside from that, aside from that, as they're talking about
Speaker 4: this possible.
Speaker 1: Ceasefire slash true s line being done in.
Speaker 4: Ukraine, it would make sense to me also that Donnie
Speaker 4: T would be somewhere in the conversation for that, honestly,
Speaker 4: and then him being the one who wrote the book
Speaker 4: The Art of the Deal, it would make sense that
Speaker 4: he would come to that deal table. But a Korean
Speaker 4: spot that once again he came, he saw, he made
Speaker 4: some things happen. Wild shit's going on over there, Jonathan
Speaker 4: and uh, real quick. This is a quick comedic look
Speaker 4: at it all. And of course this guy's on the
Speaker 4: liberal side of things.
Speaker 1: It is what it is. But this is a humorous look.
Speaker 2: He's pretty funny though. I like him just for his
Speaker 2: for his first comedy.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 17: Breaking news this morning out of South Korea where the
Speaker 17: president there just declared marshall law.
Speaker 18: Okay, soth Korea, stop giving top ideas.
Speaker 1: He didn't know you could do that.
Speaker 18: Unfortunately for South Korea, this looks like the beginning of
Speaker 18: a long and slow descent into dictatorship of a doc
Speaker 18: period which may last years or even decades.
Speaker 1: Breaking news from overseas.
Speaker 17: South Korea's parliament just voted to nullify the declaration of
Speaker 17: martial law that was made by the country's president just
Speaker 17: a few hours earlier.
Speaker 18: Oh that's great, good old Asian efficiency. The president went nuts,
Speaker 18: declared martial law. The assembly overruled head martial law over
Speaker 18: and they did it all in a lunch break. All right,
Speaker 18: everybody get back to doing kup.
Speaker 2: Everybody get back to doing K pop. That's hilarious.
Speaker 4: He's pretty good, But I did want to look at
Speaker 4: it from a more humorous standpoint. But now we need
Speaker 4: to look at this because this was some very uh,
Speaker 4: some very cool like things going on, which will in
Speaker 4: fact lead us to our next talking point.
Speaker 1: But bro, this is fucking wild.
Speaker 4: The president declared martial law for reasons, and then the government,
Speaker 4: the parliament government pretty much said no, we're not gonna
Speaker 4: let you have your power to do that right now.
Speaker 1: It's like wild shit. And keep in mind, South.
Speaker 4: Korea is a really really really tight ally to America,
Speaker 4: not Israel type, but up there in the top five, I'll.
Speaker 3: Say that right it is. It was interesting to see that,
Speaker 3: Oh my god, they called for martial law and then
Speaker 3: it was literally like three hours later, there's no martial law.
Speaker 2: It's not going to happen.
Speaker 4: Wild shit. And you've got to understand why this is
Speaker 4: important for America. Okay, so we have a lot of
Speaker 4: military bases in that area, and especially with the continent
Speaker 4: of Asia in that area, China, Russia, and North Korea
Speaker 4: all being sold up right there, all nice, tight and neat.
Speaker 4: It's really important for us to keep our military bases
Speaker 4: in South Korea on the up and up.
Speaker 1: And when the South Korean government is doing wild shit,
Speaker 1: it makes the American military a little uneasy.
Speaker 4: We don't really like when our home bases are surrounded
Speaker 4: by turmoil. It makes us a little itchy, you.
Speaker 1: Know what I mean. So this is kind of a
Speaker 1: big deal.
Speaker 4: How it happened, why it happened, and how it ended
Speaker 4: is all very very interesting.
Speaker 1: So let's go ahead and listen to this one.
Speaker 8: Here a very surprising and unexpected twist to South Korean politics.
Speaker 8: The president declared martial law, the first time we've seen
Speaker 8: this in more than four decades. What we saw was
Speaker 8: intense militarization. Armed soldiers storm into the National Assembly building
Speaker 8: that required some lawmakers to scale fences to get incite
Speaker 8: the building to take the votes to tell this president
Speaker 8: to end martial law. It was essentially a scene out
Speaker 8: of a film, a film that many South Koreans wish
Speaker 8: they would never have to see.
Speaker 1: Bro.
Speaker 4: Before before I let the rest of it play out here,
Speaker 4: the politicians had to break into windows and scale buildings
Speaker 4: to be able to get into the building to pass
Speaker 4: the vote to let him say no to martial law. Bro,
Speaker 4: there was a reason Marshall law was being declared. They
Speaker 4: had to fucking scale the building to get in.
Speaker 3: That is so insane, Like you said, it kind of
Speaker 3: is like a scene out of a movie, the way
Speaker 3: that shit really went down.
Speaker 1: And and oh, it gets weirder the more we listen.
Speaker 1: I promise you let's go.
Speaker 8: This was a pretty short lived run of martial law
Speaker 8: in South Korea. President announced it around ten thirty on
Speaker 8: Tuesday night.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read this part because like it's in Korean.
Speaker 4: Uh, this is an unavoidable step to protect the freedoms
Speaker 4: and safety of the people, as well as to ensure
Speaker 4: the nation's sustainability and security against the anti state forces.
Speaker 8: The legislature told him this needed to end, and a
Speaker 8: few hours after that to President around four thirty in
Speaker 8: the morning here a local time on Wednesday, so that
Speaker 8: he would acknowledge the vote telling him to end martial law.
Speaker 8: What was among the most surprising developments on a completely
Speaker 8: surprising day was that US officials, both publicly and privately,
Speaker 8: said they were not given advanced notice.
Speaker 17: We are watching the recent developments in the ROKA with
Speaker 17: grave concern.
Speaker 8: From this South Korean administration's perspective, they have no closer
Speaker 8: ally than the US and no more important ally than
Speaker 8: the US. So for the President to take this traumatic
Speaker 8: of a move to declare martial law, which has affected
Speaker 8: everything from the stock market to unnerving diplomats to unnerving
Speaker 8: people inside the country, is quite surprising. The whirlwind of
Speaker 8: this martial law lasted only a couple of hours, but
Speaker 8: the legacy will be quite long running. For President Unsoka,
Speaker 8: it basically starts the shot clock or a potential impeachment vote.
Speaker 8: Yun won election in twenty twenty two. He has a
Speaker 8: five year term. He should be president through twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 8: President Yun is not a politician by background. He was
Speaker 8: a career prosecutor. He's a political neophyt, so his moves
Speaker 8: don't really follow the traditional playbook of what we expect
Speaker 8: a politician, let alone a country leader to take. What's
Speaker 8: his endgame? President Yun has really leaned into political division.
Speaker 1: In so he's a lawyer by trade.
Speaker 4: Like keep that one on the back burner, this guy,
Speaker 4: and we're gonna play the rest of it here. But
Speaker 4: like Trump is not a politician, he's a four to
Speaker 4: five hundred se this guy is a neophyte. He is
Speaker 4: a career lawyer. Finding loopholes and interpretations in the wording
Speaker 4: of the law has been this man's bread and butter.
Speaker 4: His entire career, and now he's the leader of South Korea.
Speaker 4: So just again it's interesting of the house and the
Speaker 4: whis but we're going to continue.
Speaker 8: In recent years, he's castigated his political enemies as being
Speaker 8: anti state. He's even equated them to communists totalitarian forces.
Speaker 8: He felt that the opposition political forces were a threat
Speaker 8: to democracy or a threat to the constitution. South Korele,
Speaker 8: like a lot of democracies, is under a lot of
Speaker 8: political tension and poor to one survey from Pure Research Center,
Speaker 8: the only country that has a more polarized political climate
Speaker 8: than the US in South Korea. The year started in
Speaker 8: January with the opposition leader ejmng beek stabbed in the
Speaker 8: neck surgery, and within this malaise there's a lot of
Speaker 8: BackFlash and angst and President Euni he's bared the brunt
Speaker 8: of that he has low approval ratings and after this
Speaker 8: dramatic move of declaring martial law, the upside for him
Speaker 8: has winnowed even further and fact might start the process
Speaker 8: that could end his political career.
Speaker 4: Okay, so you boy already had one guy get stabbed
Speaker 4: in the neck and died earlier this year.
Speaker 3: Okay, assassination attempt is what you're saying right here?
Speaker 4: Oh no, No, he was a successfully assassinated. He got
Speaker 4: stabbed in the jugular and bled out.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah yeah, the previous guy, right right, right.
Speaker 4: So this guy who as soon as he took office
Speaker 4: started prosecuting other politicians who were his political enemies, who
Speaker 4: he said were communists in nature, and we're being backed
Speaker 4: by North Korean all of these things. Then he gets
Speaker 4: in and declares martial law, and then those same politicians
Speaker 4: that he was going after, scaled the walls of the building,
Speaker 4: broke in through windows, had to have armed guards to
Speaker 4: let them get into the building to cast their votes
Speaker 4: to reject the martial law six hours after the fact.
Speaker 3: Is this like the Hobbit before the Twin Towers kind
Speaker 3: of situation going on here?
Speaker 1: I mean, you tell me what this sounds like.
Speaker 4: But I could also see I could okay, third eye
Speaker 4: all the way open here, let's look at it from
Speaker 4: all angles here. Okay, So like, okay, On the one hand,
Speaker 4: I could see this as a slimy, slimy lawyer type
Speaker 4: getting into the highest political office and going after revenge
Speaker 4: and retribution after every political person whoever made his career
Speaker 4: hell or who won't change laws to.
Speaker 1: Favor things that he wants changed, and all these things.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I could absolutely see it being on some evil
Speaker 4: villain shit like witch hunt that they had to stop
Speaker 4: early before it even got worse. Okay, that sure, Sure
Speaker 4: I could also see this very remnant of a politician
Speaker 4: who wasn't a politician who took office and realized how
Speaker 4: corrupt the system is and then started to drain the swamp,
Speaker 4: if you will, and decided that, you know what, we
Speaker 4: need a hammer to break down this building rather than
Speaker 4: a scalpel to surgically remove this tumor. So he decided
Speaker 4: to declare martial law because that's the only way that
Speaker 4: he was gonna be able to take the force needed
Speaker 4: to put the people in jail that needed to be jailed.
Speaker 4: And those very people snuck in by their own security
Speaker 4: and stopped it from happening because they knew that their
Speaker 4: asses were screwed if they would have let it continue. Okay,
Speaker 4: I could see that as well. All I'm saying is
Speaker 4: that your boy didn't even tell America, So that tells
Speaker 4: me this wasn't according to plan. That tells me this
Speaker 4: was kind of out of left field. Because if anything,
Speaker 4: if you're gonna do some wild ass shit in your
Speaker 4: closest ally is America.
Speaker 1: You might want to give us a heads up that
Speaker 1: you're about to do some wild shit.
Speaker 3: You would think so, Like that's like you would think so.
Speaker 3: But maybe he was just trying to take care of
Speaker 3: it on his own. That's a possibility maybe. But also
Speaker 3: maybe he's, uh, I don't know, trying to have some
Speaker 3: kind of totalitarian like kingsmanship kind of shit going on
Speaker 3: over there, because Hey, I'm the president. I get to
Speaker 3: do whatever the fuck I want. I got a big
Speaker 3: presidential dick. And if I say that there's gonna be
Speaker 3: martial law in order to prosecute all these scumbags, then
Speaker 3: that's the way that it's going to be. Now, all right,
Speaker 3: this is the kind of shit you would expect out
Speaker 3: of another country not named the United States.
Speaker 2: Is this where you're trying to take it?
Speaker 19: Like?
Speaker 2: Is this something that Donnie t is capable of doing?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 4: And I'm not even saying this is remnant of Donnet
Speaker 4: because to be completely honest with you, I do not
Speaker 4: know the scope of South Korean politics currently.
Speaker 1: I have no idea.
Speaker 4: If this guy is like a dictator and like he's
Speaker 4: truly evil and like follow the money, and there's records
Speaker 4: of this, this and this.
Speaker 1: I haven't dug deep yet, right.
Speaker 4: So I could be I have no idea if this
Speaker 4: guy is like potentially white hat type of characteristics and
Speaker 4: like he didn't even want to run, but like, you know,
Speaker 4: his family was wronged by the government, so he had
Speaker 4: to climb into the belly of the beast to right
Speaker 4: that wrong.
Speaker 1: And now he's in that position, and.
Speaker 4: It I have no idea, you know what I mean,
Speaker 4: Jacob has zero dog in the South Korean fight currently.
Speaker 4: I do know that America shouldn't feel happy, happy, joy
Speaker 4: joy with wild shit going on in South Korea. That's
Speaker 4: not good for business, that's not good for us for
Speaker 4: our safety. Right So all right, apparently it got resolved
Speaker 4: ish and we'll see if he stays in power now
Speaker 4: as a third caveat third eye all the way open.
Speaker 4: And this is a conspiracy podcast after all, is it
Speaker 4: also possible that the war machine needs a boogeyman in
Speaker 4: that area? And North Korea is looking extra fun right
Speaker 4: now and this current administration would have not done what
Speaker 4: needed to be done in the next few weeks slash
Speaker 4: months to make some war happen.
Speaker 1: Look, I don't know. I know that wilder shit has happened.
Speaker 4: I know that the CIA is deposed governments all over
Speaker 4: South America for not doing what they wanted to do
Speaker 4: as far as making a military coup happen, So like
Speaker 4: that's kind of nothing new.
Speaker 1: Gulf of Tonkin put us in Vietnam, for fuck's sake.
Speaker 3: I think that if that were to happen in America,
Speaker 3: not saying that it's going to, but if it were
Speaker 3: to happen in America, I feel like now would be
Speaker 3: the perfect.
Speaker 2: Time for that to happen. Like the climate is perfect.
Speaker 3: You think about it, like there's a Republican president going
Speaker 3: into the White House. The Republicans owned the House and
Speaker 3: the Senate.
Speaker 1: And most of the Supreme Court.
Speaker 3: And most of the Supreme Court, right like, and remember
Speaker 3: Trump was firing everybody that wasn't agreeing with him, and
Speaker 3: who's to say that he didn't get all the right
Speaker 3: people in there to kind of carry out this plant. Now,
Speaker 3: I don't think that's actually gonna happen. I think that
Speaker 3: RFK being there, I hope that there's going to be
Speaker 3: some accountability held, you know, with that Tulsi the same
Speaker 3: thing Elon.
Speaker 2: I think Elon benefits either way, to be honest with you,
Speaker 2: and he's.
Speaker 1: The chaotic neutral. Let's not forget that.
Speaker 4: Please, everybody, don't start like getting on his dick, but
Speaker 4: also don't like start hating him either.
Speaker 1: Let's keep him where we have him, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 2: The jury is still out on Elon.
Speaker 3: I want to like him, but I also know that
Speaker 3: he very easily could go evil villain so quickly.
Speaker 4: He could wake up tomorrow with that intention, and there's
Speaker 4: nothing that anybody could do to stop him. I'm so
Speaker 4: I'm chaotic neutral, dude. I'm telling you, dude, one hundred percent.
Speaker 3: I would not be shocked if Elon straps on a
Speaker 3: fucking Iron Man suit and starts taking out little countries
Speaker 3: that are involved in some kind of war.
Speaker 2: Like I would not. He definitely could, dude. He was
Speaker 2: selling fucking flamethrowers for a couple hundred bucks.
Speaker 1: He's selling robots for thirty k.
Speaker 4: You're telling me he couldn't get them jet packs and
Speaker 4: guns and go take over some small countries right now,
Speaker 4: Fiso chows. Look, there's literally nothing stopping him other than
Speaker 4: him being an Okay, guy, like, let's be real here.
Speaker 3: Which, by the way, people have been having some wild
Speaker 3: conversations with.
Speaker 2: Those Elon robots. Oh yeah, uh dude, Yeah.
Speaker 3: I think we're gonna have to do a whole episode
Speaker 3: on it because they have a little bit of weird
Speaker 3: insight about the future that you're like, what are we
Speaker 3: talking about? Like almost like Alexa, Like Alexa knew that
Speaker 3: Kamala was gonna be president and she was gonna win
Speaker 3: this presidency and all that kind of shit, which not
Speaker 3: gonna lie to you. It's it seemed like obviously Trump
Speaker 3: got nominated, right And I think that until Trump takes
Speaker 3: that seat in the.
Speaker 2: White House, we can't even say that he's president right now.
Speaker 3: And I know that he's still elecked and he's presumed
Speaker 3: to be president and stuff like that. But I'm I'm
Speaker 3: not one hundred percent sold that that's actually going to happen,
Speaker 3: because you think about it, this whole idea of a
Speaker 3: World War three sparking off before Trump gets in office.
Speaker 2: What's gonna happen?
Speaker 3: Then Joe Biden gets to stay there, Kamala gets to
Speaker 3: stay there. They're not going to introduce a new president
Speaker 3: whenever there's an active war going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they will, Bro, there's nobody.
Speaker 4: Even the Democrats who were all about how he is
Speaker 4: actually still there in the head have now come out
Speaker 4: and said that he clearly does not have the mental
Speaker 4: faculties to be in this position. There's no way they
Speaker 4: can reverse that one. They can't Uno reverso, Uno reverso.
Speaker 4: They can't reverse it on themselves. They can reverse on us.
Speaker 4: They could reverse it on others if they, I mean,
Speaker 4: they could try. They could fucking try, and I'll bet
Speaker 4: you they will. Wow, dude, Well, here's how they would
Speaker 4: all of a sudden say that, oh, Bro, Joe's back,
Speaker 4: he got some peptide.
Speaker 3: No no, no, no, never, no no. Joe would have a
Speaker 3: heart attack and die. Kamala would then take the take
Speaker 3: the fucking throne, Oh god, and then she would be
Speaker 3: the acting president until the war eventually dies out in
Speaker 3: twenty years.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 4: I would who would be really hard for me to
Speaker 4: stay in this country. I'm not saying I would leave.
Speaker 4: I'm saying I would start looking. I would start looking around. Bro,
Speaker 4: New Zealand would be looking really nice to me.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying it wouldn't be outside of the realm
Speaker 3: of their playbook.
Speaker 1: That would be fucking wild.
Speaker 3: Bro, which, by the way, I have been calling that
Speaker 3: since day one. I have been calling that one. Even
Speaker 3: if Trump won, I'm not I'm not sold that he
Speaker 3: would actually be in the White House as president.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 1: I think he will be.
Speaker 4: But you know what, even if something like that was
Speaker 4: to happen, I'll be honest with you, Jonathan, I don't
Speaker 4: think that even that even segues to our next our
Speaker 4: next talking point here, So as we were talking about
Speaker 4: Korean DMZs and these crazy things going on, as we're
Speaker 4: talking about Ukraine and possible ceasefires and all these things,
Speaker 4: they kind of talking in the military coup realman, as
Speaker 4: we're talking about this with Kamala, if that was to happen,
Speaker 4: I could see something like a military coup taking off.
Speaker 4: Gonna be very honest with you, I think the gloves
Speaker 4: will come off on a lot of crazy American civilians.
Speaker 1: But that's just me. I don't know.
Speaker 4: But have you heard about and this might strike a
Speaker 4: little extra chord with you, sir, have you heard of
Speaker 4: what's going on in Brazil?
Speaker 3: You know, you would think that I would be caught
Speaker 3: up with all that, wouldn't you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 4: I mean, I don't know if you and your your
Speaker 4: lovely wife keep up on the current goings ons of Brazil.
Speaker 3: But uh, she's also not really into politics, So there's that.
Speaker 1: That's fair.
Speaker 4: This is from ABC News Australia as a two weeks ago,
Speaker 4: and now I'm going to place something from a couple
Speaker 4: of days ago to show you how the situation is progressed.
Speaker 4: They are dealing with failed assassination, the townson, failed military
Speaker 4: coups right after an election. Wild shit's going down in Brazil.
Speaker 4: Let's check it out.
Speaker 12: It's January eighth, twenty twenty three, and supporters of defeated
Speaker 12: right wing president jayib Bolsonaro have stormed Brazil's presidential palace
Speaker 12: and attacked government buildings. They're angry he's lost the recent
Speaker 12: election and demanding military leaders intervene, just one week after
Speaker 12: his rival Lula de Silva was sworn in as president.
Speaker 12: Nearly two years later, the investigation of the bizarre events
Speaker 12: leading up to that day culminate in Brazilian police indicting
Speaker 12: the ex president on charges of attempting a coup.
Speaker 2: They continue to accuse me of a coup. Now the
Speaker 2: coup is because there's.
Speaker 5: A draft of state of emergence decree, a coup using
Speaker 5: the constitution.
Speaker 12: Have holy patients now in the Supreme Court. Another investigation
Speaker 12: is heating up with mister Bolsonaro's former personal assistant called
Speaker 12: to testify on an alleged assassination attempt against President Lula
Speaker 12: just days before he took office in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 12: Yet another Bolsonnaro aide was among five ex military and
Speaker 12: police arrested in connection with the alleged Green and Yellow
Speaker 12: Dagger plot earlier this week.
Speaker 19: If it is confirmed there was a plan for the
Speaker 19: assassination of an elected president, the elected vice president and
Speaker 19: a Supreme Court minister, these criminals must be arrested within
Speaker 19: the rigor of the law.
Speaker 12: Soon after President Lula broke his two year silence on
Speaker 12: the ordeal, you are.
Speaker 20: The attempt to poison myself and Vice President Alkman didn't work,
Speaker 20: and we are here.
Speaker 1: You remember when I.
Speaker 20: Was running in the elections, I said that one of
Speaker 20: my wishes was to bring Brazil back to normality, to
Speaker 20: democratic civility.
Speaker 12: The years since the election have done little to aise
Speaker 12: the tension on Brazil's government. The Supreme Court itself was
Speaker 12: rocked in a bomb attack just last week. The attack
Speaker 12: triggered an evacuation, but killed only its perpetrator, a former
Speaker 12: council candidate of Chaia Bolsonaro's party. Another attempt to disrupt
Speaker 12: Brazil's government up in smoke, Angus Macintosh, ABC News.
Speaker 4: Okay, so basically a couple of years ago there was
Speaker 4: an attempt at a military coup that took place, and
Speaker 4: now the investigation has come out about the Green and
Speaker 4: Yellow Dagger assassination plot. That's what it's called, by the way,
Speaker 4: which I have to give style points to Brazil. They
Speaker 4: have flair. Okay, say what you want about them, but
Speaker 4: Brazilians have style them When they name an assassination attempt
Speaker 4: the Green and Yellow Dagger, that that's fucking balls deep, bro.
Speaker 1: I like that.
Speaker 2: It sounds pretty badass, you know. But yeah, dude, this
Speaker 2: is the kind of shit that goes on over there.
Speaker 3: To be real with you, like, this is not really
Speaker 3: out of the realm of like what is regular over
Speaker 3: in Brazil. Brazil is always I was getting no arguments
Speaker 3: with my wife about Brazil being a third world country. No,
Speaker 3: it's not a third world country, and it is.
Speaker 4: Very much is just because it has like modern amenities
Speaker 4: in the big city, doesn't negate the massive slum and
Speaker 4: you know, the giant rainforest and all.
Speaker 3: There's that, there's that, But yeah, it's it's these I
Speaker 3: almost feel bad in saying a lesser developed country, but yeah,
Speaker 3: uh yeah, that's kind of what you would expect out
Speaker 3: of the situation like that.
Speaker 4: We're not shitting on countries that aren't doing as well
Speaker 4: as America. Now, I think it's pretty well understood that
Speaker 4: Rio is only nice near the statue, Like I think
Speaker 4: the the ever since they had the World Cup in Rio,
Speaker 4: I think that the has been pulled off of people's
Speaker 4: eyes in that regard.
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty well understood.
Speaker 4: Hell, that's why they had to jump into bricks to
Speaker 4: try to save their ass.
Speaker 3: Hey, dude, that's awesome place to party, Like you want
Speaker 3: to go there for carnival, You want to go there,
Speaker 3: uh and visit the beaches and shit like that. But
Speaker 3: there is a lot, a lot, a lot of like
Speaker 3: danger and crime and uh, people getting mugged on a
Speaker 3: daily basis. It's it's not even unheard of. Like whenever,
Speaker 3: whenever you say, like if you lived in Brazil your
Speaker 3: whole life, it is it is normal to say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: my car got stolen at least once. Like that's a
Speaker 3: normal thing to say that your car got stolen at least.
Speaker 2: Oh you only got your car stolen once.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 2: That's not bad, Like that's that's fucking insane, dude, that's crazy,
Speaker 2: isn't it.
Speaker 1: I've had my car.
Speaker 4: Broken into twice in my life, never stolen, like actually taken.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's the difference.
Speaker 4: In Brazil, they take the entire car because they bring
Speaker 4: into a chop shop.
Speaker 1: And take every fucking thing here.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they'll take it to a chop shop and just
Speaker 4: off the catalytic converter and just crunch the car for
Speaker 4: the rest and it's an easy five hundred dollars like
Speaker 4: that's it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so a little bit different, but yeah, I mean, dude,
Speaker 3: politics are very weird this time of year.
Speaker 4: Well, I mean, that's in twenty twenty two that this
Speaker 4: military coup plot, right was foiled in all of this,
Speaker 4: but now the investigations come out, which has sparked more
Speaker 4: wild shit to happen currently in Brazil. Now this is
Speaker 4: as of a real quick eight days ago, and this
Speaker 4: is a French twenty four franch twenty four to English.
Speaker 1: But let's see how the situation has progressed.
Speaker 10: The evidence is piling up on Jay Bilsonaro, the former
Speaker 10: Brazilian president, is accused of being involved in a failed
Speaker 10: coup attempt to topple his successor, Lula, following the twenty
Speaker 10: twenty two presidential election. A federal police report of more
Speaker 10: than eight hundred pages has highlighted his extensive involvement.
Speaker 21: The evidence collected throughout the investigation shows unequivocally that Bolsonnaro planned, acted,
Speaker 21: and was directly and effectively aware of the actions of
Speaker 21: the criminal organization aiming to launch a coup de tat
Speaker 21: and eliminate the democratic rule of law, which did not
Speaker 21: take place due to reasons unrelated to his desire.
Speaker 10: According to the report, insufficient support from Brazil's military top
Speaker 10: brass held him back. The commander of the navy was
Speaker 10: on board with the coup, but senior leaders of the
Speaker 10: army and air force were against any kind of measure
Speaker 10: that would cause an institutional rupture in the country. The
Speaker 10: former fire Right leader has said the accusations are madness.
Speaker 16: Nobody is going to stage a coup with a retired
Speaker 16: general and half a dozen officers.
Speaker 1: What they're saying is absurd.
Speaker 2: There was never any question of me carrying out to
Speaker 2: Cuda tat.
Speaker 10: But the noose is tightening around Bolsonaro's neck. The investigation
Speaker 10: also claims the former president was fully aware of an
Speaker 10: assassination attempt against Lulah and mentions a draft decree aimed
Speaker 10: at provoking new elections and arresting Judge Marius, one of
Speaker 10: his sworn enemies. Bolscenaro has been ruled ineligible for office
Speaker 10: until twenty thirty over allegedly planning to disseminate false information
Speaker 10: to discredit the election ballot box system, and on the
Speaker 10: eighth of January twenty twenty three, thousands of his supporters
Speaker 10: ransacked multiple government buildings. But despite the charges weighing heavily
Speaker 10: on his political future, Bolscenario still intends to run in
Speaker 10: the twenty twenty six presidential election.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, dude.
Speaker 3: And you know what's very crazy is that there are
Speaker 3: so many countries that are looking at the playbook of
Speaker 3: how Trump was able to get so many followers and
Speaker 3: so many voters in such a quick amount of time,
Speaker 3: and they're using that as almost like a blueprint to
Speaker 3: be able to run their own kind of election. And
Speaker 3: it's crazy because you're here, Like whenever they talk about
Speaker 3: Boston Arrow, they talk about how he's far right and everything.
Speaker 3: He literally is stating almost identically the same rhetoric that
Speaker 3: Trump has been saying for the.
Speaker 2: Last eight years.
Speaker 3: Like it is crazy how almost identical it is. And
Speaker 3: then you got what was it over in South Korea too?
Speaker 3: Like kind of a similar situation over there, not necessarily
Speaker 3: full swing, but like you see, how you know, whenever
Speaker 3: you have extremism it it can be very popular for
Speaker 3: the loudest mouths, right Like, and that's why whenever you
Speaker 3: hear like, oh well, we're not gonna call them pedophiles anymore,
Speaker 3: We're gonna call them minor attracted persons, the only people
Speaker 3: that are saying that are the absolute extremeist. It seems
Speaker 3: like it's a whole side, but it's really just the
Speaker 3: loud mouths on that side, right And so, but I mean,
Speaker 3: those loud mouths create really really good Uh what are
Speaker 3: those big microphones called a really big like a really
Speaker 3: good megaphone to the mass.
Speaker 4: I hear what you're saying, dude, but I mean possibly possibly.
Speaker 4: But your boy crossed the line when he went to
Speaker 4: criminal organizations to have him assassinated through poison, right, and
Speaker 4: then he's saying, that's bullshit.
Speaker 1: I never did any of that. Meanwhile, Secretary of the
Speaker 1: Navy over here.
Speaker 4: Was like, yeah, I was on board with it one
Speaker 4: hundred percent, and the army in the Air Force like no, man,
Speaker 4: we said no, one hundred percent. He's like, I said
Speaker 4: no to what. I'd never had that conversation with you.
Speaker 14: Bro.
Speaker 4: The heads of the military are talking about the meeting
Speaker 4: that he is saying never happened.
Speaker 3: Oh dude, yeah, I mean we're talking about lying liars
Speaker 3: and their politicians.
Speaker 2: That's they gotta lie about it.
Speaker 4: I mean, but the fact that they're split on it,
Speaker 4: Like if the generals were going to speak on it,
Speaker 4: they would all be in unison of like we never
Speaker 4: heard anything.
Speaker 1: This guy's crazy, or they would all be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: he came to us, but we're loyal.
Speaker 4: We said no, they wouldn't be this one guy that's like, yeah, no,
Speaker 4: I was on board one hundred percent. Let's do this, like, bro,
Speaker 4: who whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. Hey, at least
Speaker 4: get your stories together, bro.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's not a lot of good structure going on.
Speaker 3: With that situation for sure.
Speaker 1: And I'll say this as far as comparing you boy
Speaker 1: to Trump.
Speaker 4: Yeah, when his supporters stormed the capitol or whatever, the
Speaker 4: Brazilian supporters torched the police.
Speaker 1: And broke shit and turn turned up for what you
Speaker 1: know what I mean?
Speaker 4: When the uh Jan sixers stormed the capitol, very very
Speaker 4: little destruction and a lot of respect and pictures taken
Speaker 4: and like just tours and things. I also say there's
Speaker 4: a different vibe.
Speaker 3: They were if you look back at the video footage.
Speaker 3: They were welcomed in. The doors were not like like
Speaker 3: barraged into No, they were open, and they allowed them
Speaker 3: to go in there.
Speaker 1: And they didn't like tear the place apart either. It's
Speaker 1: all good.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And the only person that died was because of
Speaker 3: wasn't it like one of the secureity guards or something
Speaker 3: like that killed somebody?
Speaker 4: Yep, yep, rip All right, that wonderful, gorgeous Trump supporter
Speaker 4: makes you rest in peace. But uh yeah, it's do
Speaker 4: you see what I'm saying here, There's wild shit going
Speaker 4: on all over the world now, this whole Brazil situation,
Speaker 4: the bricks. They're saying that the South Korean situation's fucking
Speaker 4: up the stock market. I can't imagine the brazil situation
Speaker 4: is helping out the fledgling bricks system either. I know
Speaker 4: that you don't have much of a dog in the
Speaker 4: Brazilian fight here, but what do you think about that,
Speaker 4: especially when we know, like Argentina's got that dude that
Speaker 4: came in with a chainsaw and shit, so like wild
Speaker 4: shit's popping off in South America?
Speaker 1: What do you take this as?
Speaker 3: I mean, I can appreciate the Brazilian culture. I love
Speaker 3: the food. I love, you know, like the the attitude
Speaker 3: and the music and the family, you know, kind of
Speaker 3: structure they got going on over there. My son is
Speaker 3: half Brazilian, my wife is Brazilian, and that's pretty much
Speaker 3: where I leave it as far as the whole country goes.
Speaker 3: I would love to visit there one day. I plan
Speaker 3: on visiting it there next year, if we don't get bombed.
Speaker 3: That's my goal is to you know, well not next year,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty six. I hope to eventually visit there, you know,
Speaker 3: because she talks so highly.
Speaker 2: Of it and it looks beautiful.
Speaker 3: I'm not exactly thrilled about somebody coming up to me
Speaker 3: and holding a gun to my head and telling and
Speaker 3: them telling me to give me or for me to
Speaker 3: give them my wallet, or for me to give them
Speaker 3: any kind of identification and just hand it over.
Speaker 2: Not a huge fan of that.
Speaker 3: I'm not somebody that's just like, do this and then
Speaker 3: just do it like I'm gonna probably fight. And she
Speaker 3: says that's not a good idea because then they'll actually
Speaker 3: kill you.
Speaker 2: So I have a problem with that. But I am
Speaker 2: excited to go to Brazil one day. But as far
Speaker 2: as their politics go, I could really give a shit less.
Speaker 1: Im. Yes, it's a little too close to home, man.
Speaker 4: I don't like it same way that when the Mexican
Speaker 4: election just took place last was earlier this year. Last
Speaker 4: year they had like what thirty nine assassinations. Yeah, before
Speaker 4: they finally had the election and got somebody sworn in
Speaker 4: and like to sit in the seat. Extremism is popular,
Speaker 4: but well that was a lot of cartel mayhem. But uh,
Speaker 4: I don't know, man, especially with the way the world
Speaker 4: is shaking out right now and all these things, possible ceasefires,
Speaker 4: possible things heating up, all this, and our boy Donnie
Speaker 4: t is talking about sending our like Tier one units
Speaker 4: to fuck up cartel leaders.
Speaker 1: I like that a lot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I guess we'll see. It's kind of just a
Speaker 3: wait and see. I don't like being in this lame
Speaker 3: duck phase of the presidency. We've already seen some some
Speaker 3: crazy shit go down with Hunter Biden being you know,
Speaker 3: kind of let go, let off the hook, and and
Speaker 3: I think that that was to be honest with you,
Speaker 3: I think that with Hunter Biden being pardoned, that pardons
Speaker 3: a lot of the shit that Joe Biden was also
Speaker 3: involved in if.
Speaker 4: You really think about it, absolutely, because anything that they
Speaker 4: could use against Joe Biden just got wipe clean.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, it didn't happen. It's completely pardon.
Speaker 4: Because he was just taking a cut off of the top.
Speaker 4: He wasn't the guy he was getting his cut. He
Speaker 4: was the big man, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Like that's all now, that situation on paper didn't happen.
Speaker 4: Well, at least as far as Hunter's concerned. Now, as
Speaker 4: far as where Mitt Romney's kid was at the Bereisma shit,
Speaker 4: Pelosi's kid Chelsea Clinton, like, look, who knows, who knows
Speaker 4: how that's gonna shake out for them. But as far
Speaker 4: as Hunter's concerned and everything on the laptop, everything that
Speaker 4: may come out about Epstein, everything that may come out
Speaker 4: about Diddy, everything that may come out about his goings
Speaker 4: and comings in and around DC for the last twenty years, all.
Speaker 1: Of that wipe clean.
Speaker 4: And anybody that was, you know, associated with that laptop
Speaker 4: or whatever may have been seen or found on that
Speaker 4: laptop or what. Yeah, that's gone, that's good, can't use
Speaker 4: in court. No president said, So.
Speaker 2: That's some bullshit that shouldn't even be a thing. Pardons.
Speaker 2: I think that that is the scammiest shit ever.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, Trump pardoned people too, not to this level. No, no, no, no.
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm just saying every president has the ability
Speaker 4: to do this, and a lot of them do. Sometimes
Speaker 4: it gets made public. A lot of times it goes
Speaker 4: under the radar and we never hear about it.
Speaker 2: I mean, has there ever been a president who has
Speaker 2: pardoned their family member?
Speaker 4: I believe, you know, let's google that. Let's check it out.
Speaker 4: Is there any president? I wonder if like somebody's uh,
Speaker 4: pardoned a family member for like income tax evasion or
Speaker 4: something like that, I could see.
Speaker 3: That pardoned a family member.
Speaker 2: All right, let's see. Oh, here we go. There's a
Speaker 2: false claim that Jimmy Carter and George H. W. Bush
Speaker 2: pardoned family members, so it says, yeah, it says.
Speaker 3: A December twond thread post claims to identify two other
Speaker 3: presidents who gave pardons to family members before Joe Biden
Speaker 3: issued one to his son Hunter Jimmy Carter partner.
Speaker 2: And this is the post.
Speaker 3: It says, Jimmy Carter pardoned his brother Billy Carter, who
Speaker 3: took over two hundred grand from Libya as its foreign agent.
Speaker 3: The post said George H. W. Bush or Daddy Bush
Speaker 3: pardoned his son Neil Bush for his role in the
Speaker 3: SNL scandals of the nineteen eighties. Nobody thinks those pardons
Speaker 3: defined either presidency.
Speaker 2: And that was just.
Speaker 4: Wait, wait, wait, the Saturday Night Live scandals of the
Speaker 4: nineteen eighties were connected to Neil Bush.
Speaker 2: No, not s NL S and L. I don't know
Speaker 2: what that is.
Speaker 1: Okay, I about to say, wait, what the fuck did
Speaker 1: I miss? Well, it says.
Speaker 3: The threads post was reposted more than fouriuner times in
Speaker 3: three days. The claim was also shared widely by other
Speaker 3: thread users. A version posted on x by the executive
Speaker 3: editor of the liberal group Occupied Democrats was reposted thousands
Speaker 3: of times.
Speaker 2: Before he shared a correction, and.
Speaker 3: It says the rating is, Oh, this is a fun
Speaker 3: time where fact checks are cool. It says our rating.
Speaker 3: As far as the claim goes false. Neither president pardoned
Speaker 3: the relatives referenced in the post, according to the US
Speaker 3: Pardon Attorney's Office, So no pardons for Billy Carter or
Speaker 3: Neil Bush, says. Biden announced a pardon for his son
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden on December first, sparing him a potential prison
Speaker 3: sentence after his conviction on three federal gun felonies and
Speaker 3: federal tax charges. While the move drew widespread criticism, the
Speaker 3: threads post points to two other presidents and falsely claims
Speaker 3: that they extend the same benefit to their family members.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I guess.
Speaker 4: Oh, Joe Biden is the first and only president to
Speaker 4: pardon a family member.
Speaker 2: He's the only one. Yep.
Speaker 4: So he just showed his true corruption at the very
Speaker 4: tail end of his term, and that's that's how he'll
Speaker 4: be remembered.
Speaker 2: Yep. Right there.
Speaker 3: I love it, Uh, you know it kind of it
Speaker 3: kind of puts a pretty awesome ring to the end
Speaker 3: of his presidency.
Speaker 2: I mean, you think about it.
Speaker 3: The guy who was literally sniffing kids before he was
Speaker 3: elected president. The guy who said, oh, poor kids are
Speaker 3: just as bright as white kids.
Speaker 4: The guy who continuously shits himself, The guy who defied
Speaker 4: physics and fell upstairs on live television more times than
Speaker 4: we can count.
Speaker 3: The guy who the media has softballed questions too, like
Speaker 3: questions like what's your favorite ice cream Joe, like he's
Speaker 3: a child or a special needs kind of person.
Speaker 4: The guy who literally cannot read off of a teleprompter
Speaker 4: in any cohesive way, and half of the time we'll
Speaker 4: get off in la la land and extend his hand
Speaker 4: to shake it for somebody who's not even there.
Speaker 3: How about the time where he was reading the teleprompter
Speaker 3: and he read the word pause for applause.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, what the fuck idiot?
Speaker 3: Oh my god, the absolute most dunce president we've ever had,
Speaker 3: and uh.
Speaker 2: Thankfully it's coming to an end.
Speaker 3: But on his way out, he wanted to throw a
Speaker 3: couple of fireworks. And I mean, I can't say that
Speaker 3: we're exactly surprised. I mean shocked at the balls in,
Speaker 3: the not caring, and the absolute slap in the face
Speaker 3: of everybody that believed your bullshit.
Speaker 2: But what is to be expected is this.
Speaker 1: I think, no doubt, no doubt.
Speaker 4: Now I'm interested to see how some of these things
Speaker 4: are gonna shake out, dude, especially not just because Donald
Speaker 4: Trump's taken office. Individual each of the things that we
Speaker 4: talked about tonight, I'm very interested to see how they
Speaker 4: shake out. The Brazilian shit. Who knows what's gonna finally
Speaker 4: happen with that. I think the president, being who he
Speaker 4: is now he's in office, he's alive, everything's cool. I
Speaker 4: think he'll prosecute these people and he'll go downhill quick.
Speaker 1: The South Korean.
Speaker 4: Situation, I really don't know what to make of that,
Speaker 4: because depending on what the motives were, and depending on
Speaker 4: the intent here, this may have been somebody trying to
Speaker 4: quote unquote save his country, and this may have been
Speaker 4: somebody trying to quote unquote take his country. I really,
Speaker 4: really this is a it's like a one or zero
Speaker 4: on this one, and I'm not well versed enough in
Speaker 4: it to know exactly what.
Speaker 2: But was he jealous of Kim Jong UN's power?
Speaker 1: Bro?
Speaker 4: I don't think so, But like, if that's the case,
Speaker 4: North Korea has sent troops to the Kursk region of
Speaker 4: Russia to try to fight off the Ukrainians there, it's
Speaker 4: not going well for him. But that's neither here nor
Speaker 4: they're They're they're currently there, okay, and North Korea is
Speaker 4: talking about sending more. They are talking about taking more
Speaker 4: military advances into the near future that could make South
Speaker 4: Korea potentially a little antsy. They're on the very end
Speaker 4: of that peninsula and where they're only homie that could
Speaker 4: actually help them if shit hits the fan, well us
Speaker 4: in Japan.
Speaker 1: So I get it, right, I get it.
Speaker 4: North Korea just blew up the trains, uh, the rails
Speaker 4: and the streets that were leading from South Korea to
Speaker 4: North Korea just blew them to shit. So that's that's
Speaker 4: a sign. That's a play. That's not something like, oh,
Speaker 4: they're just doing their thing, Like no, no, no, what
Speaker 4: the fuck was that about? Right now, we have this
Speaker 4: going on, South Korean president declaring martial law six hours later,
Speaker 4: all the other politicians saying, no, you didn't. That's that
Speaker 4: sketch for.
Speaker 1: So many reasons.
Speaker 4: And I don't know how it's gonna shake out, but
Speaker 4: I'm very interested to see if they're gonna impeach him.
Speaker 1: Very interested to see if he.
Speaker 4: Uh if the point I got across whatever that he
Speaker 4: was trying to accomplish, if he got accomplished, like, I
Speaker 4: don't know.
Speaker 3: It seems like the level of intensity of the energy
Speaker 3: of the world is starting to ramp up, just in
Speaker 3: time for Trump to take office. And I don't think
Speaker 3: that that is. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Speaker 4: I don't think so. I didn't even bring up the
Speaker 4: one that the shit going on in Molli. The Wagner fighters,
Speaker 4: they sent more of them to Mali to protect the
Speaker 4: gold mines there. The locals refucked them up and sent
Speaker 4: their bodies back. It's it's insane. It was like one
Speaker 4: hundred and forty of them this time, not just eighty.
Speaker 4: That's getting a reboot.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 4: Shit all over in the Arab countries are losing their mind.
Speaker 4: Oh in other news, China, remember how we were talking, Okay,
Speaker 4: and this is ain't gonna be a long soapbox tangent,
Speaker 4: but god damn it, Okay, do you remember And I
Speaker 4: don't even remember who the guest was, and it doesn't matter.
Speaker 4: We've had multiple guests bring up these new islands that
Speaker 4: are being discovered in the Asian Ocean.
Speaker 1: R and all this.
Speaker 4: Do you know why those are being discovered is because
Speaker 4: they're being man made, are they? The Chinese have been
Speaker 4: having man made islands created off of their coast to
Speaker 4: extend their naval reach and to extend how many miles
Speaker 4: off their coast they claim is their territory. So they've
Speaker 4: been doing that on the slick for decades. The new
Speaker 4: satellite images just showed that we have all these.
Speaker 1: People saying the maps are wrong. You're lying to us.
Speaker 4: We have all this crazy landb you mean the specs
Speaker 4: of island, the sand like but whatever, Yeah.
Speaker 3: It wasn't there like two hundred thousand islands discovered or
Speaker 3: some crazy ass number like that, two.
Speaker 4: Hundred thousand specks of land, specs of land.
Speaker 1: But China claim that is their land. They made it.
Speaker 4: They dredged the sand to make it high enough to
Speaker 4: go over sea level so they could claim it. They
Speaker 4: did that all over and so neither here nor they
Speaker 4: are about these crazy lamb masks and shit.
Speaker 1: But China's doing that shit.
Speaker 4: And now all those lamb masses are starting to sink
Speaker 4: back into the ocean because that doesn't work right. It's
Speaker 4: if you're gonna do that, it takes real engineering capabilities,
Speaker 4: not you dredging up the sand at the bottom of
Speaker 4: the ocean and make uh to make an island. That
Speaker 4: doesn't work. One typhoon wipes that out.
Speaker 2: Have you seen Molana too yet?
Speaker 1: Not yet? I want to.
Speaker 3: They just need Maui to raise the islands up. That's
Speaker 3: all they need, dude.
Speaker 1: Me and my daughter just went and saw Wicked Part one.
Speaker 2: Oh it's a part one?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: They made it off the Broadways, so like right now,
Speaker 4: the end of part one of them not mistaken is
Speaker 4: when like the intermission would be on a Broadway.
Speaker 2: Oh how was that? By the way.
Speaker 4: Oh man, Okay, I'm gonna piss people off on this
Speaker 4: one because I'm me. I have to look at it
Speaker 4: through my lens. We've talked about the Wizard of Oz
Speaker 4: on this show.
Speaker 1: A time or two.
Speaker 4: I got into it with some people, and again I
Speaker 4: told them before us even started the shit that it
Speaker 4: was based off of a person who saw the movie
Speaker 4: and never read the book, clearly because they give this
Speaker 4: crazy backstory to all these things that have nothing to.
Speaker 1: Do with the book.
Speaker 4: And they were like, yes it is, it's the real
Speaker 4: backstory about blah blah blah bah, Like no, no, you're
Speaker 4: not listening. It's it's fanfic. It's amazing fanfic. It's it's
Speaker 4: beautifully done, and I love the story. I love Wicked
Speaker 4: by the way, fucking think it's great.
Speaker 2: Well, technically, technically all fictions are fanfic if you really
Speaker 2: think about it.
Speaker 4: But it's like a spin off of the movie The
Speaker 4: Wizard of Oz, not a spinoff of the book The.
Speaker 1: Wizard of Oz. And that's very clear within the first.
Speaker 4: You see what I'm saying. It's like if you were
Speaker 4: to look at the book, there's a lot.
Speaker 2: More details in the book.
Speaker 4: Yeah, right, And the book had it was a giant
Speaker 4: political satire for the day and ages it was written.
Speaker 4: That was the entire point. This is not that okay.
Speaker 4: This basically makes it to where Alpha ba the bad Witch,
Speaker 4: the green one, right, she pretty much.
Speaker 2: Don't spoil it?
Speaker 18: Are you?
Speaker 2: Are you about to spoil it?
Speaker 4: Long story short, it's all been a syop and she's
Speaker 4: been the good guy the whole time. The globals don't
Speaker 4: want you to know this, but the Wicked wisherd List
Speaker 4: is actually trying to say the world.
Speaker 2: Oh what an interesting turn of events there.
Speaker 4: That that's pretty much the theme, which again I love
Speaker 4: it for that of the fanfic of it, like Wicket
Speaker 4: is great, love the Broadway. It's amazing cool cool cool.
Speaker 4: But like the people that are trying to pretend like
Speaker 4: this is real Wizard of Oz lore, I'm like, I'm
Speaker 4: not even some sort of like a super nerd on this,
Speaker 4: but like a slight slight Google search would answer everything
Speaker 4: that you're saying right now, but like you know you're
Speaker 4: right because you just.
Speaker 1: Know, all right, dope, go on.
Speaker 3: Apparently there's a lot of weird shit going on after
Speaker 3: the fact because the two main actress, I know, Ariana
Speaker 3: Grande and then the other chick, they're looking rather scarecrow
Speaker 3: ish after shooting that.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you've seen them.
Speaker 3: They are looking very very skinny, and some people have speculated,
Speaker 3: which I think is a it's a pretty awesome connection
Speaker 3: that they think that they almost embodied what it actually
Speaker 3: was to be a witch, that they that they practiced
Speaker 3: so hard to become witches for this movie, that they
Speaker 3: almost took on the soul of a witch.
Speaker 2: And if you look back.
Speaker 3: At like, you know, during the Salem witch trials and
Speaker 3: all those you know, the actual witches, they all had
Speaker 3: the sunken in faces. They were all skin and bone
Speaker 3: it and it's looking like Ariana Grande and the other
Speaker 3: main character are looking that same way.
Speaker 2: Dude, Ariana Grande was already petite. She is looking even
Speaker 2: more skin and bone.
Speaker 4: So I watched the movie and I know that she's
Speaker 4: a tiny chick. I've I have seen her on screen
Speaker 4: since the fucking Victorious days, Okay, like she's she's been
Speaker 4: in and around on the TV, on Nicolo and all
Speaker 4: this stuff.
Speaker 1: I've seen her for years now.
Speaker 4: She looks thin, like not healthy like Mary Kate and
Speaker 4: Ashley fucking thin.
Speaker 2: In this movie, it seems like.
Speaker 4: Scentuating it with like really like Billoweed dresses and shit
Speaker 4: like that. That was really pink and very much like
Speaker 4: legally blonde vibes, like is her vibe the entire time,
Speaker 4: and so they were able to like make it look
Speaker 4: some type of way. But Dude, her sternum ribs, like
Speaker 4: the indentions on the sternum were so pronounced the entire time.
Speaker 4: It was like, and I'm not saying that to talk shit.
Speaker 4: I'm saying that because like I'm I'm worried. Like I'm
Speaker 4: not saying because in the movie she didn't really do
Speaker 4: much witch things. She was kind of the ditzy blonde
Speaker 4: who was from a rich family who never had to
Speaker 4: work for shit in her life and was kind of
Speaker 4: a cunt that her.
Speaker 1: That was her character.
Speaker 4: She became cool later Tata da character arc, but like
Speaker 4: she wasn't the quote unquote which the Green one was.
Speaker 4: But to that point, like it was kind of crazy
Speaker 4: to see her that frail looking.
Speaker 3: Well that is pretty interesting too, because remember Judy Garland
Speaker 3: said that whenever she was on set for being actually
Speaker 3: for being Dorothy, like her diet was like an apple
Speaker 3: a day and then like three packs of cigarettes per day.
Speaker 3: Like that's how she had to maintain that petite level
Speaker 3: of you know, stature.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and diet coke and cigarettes was her diet on set.
Speaker 3: I remember that, right, right, And so you wonder, I
Speaker 3: don't know, dude, there's some weird shit all connected there.
Speaker 2: So I just wanted to see what you thought about that.
Speaker 4: It's interesting, it's very interesting. But yes, that was what
Speaker 4: we saw. We saw part one. Me and my daughter
Speaker 4: went on a little daddy daughter date.
Speaker 1: It was awesome.
Speaker 3: But well, as far as Mohana two goes, if you
Speaker 3: like the first one, the second one's even better.
Speaker 2: Just just gonna say that. Oh yeah, yeah, it was
Speaker 2: really cool.
Speaker 1: I heard. I heard it sucked.
Speaker 4: I heard that they they kind of like it was
Speaker 4: horribly done off of the first one.
Speaker 15: Like it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the timeline matched up, but like the whole storyline
Speaker 4: was ass I haven't seen it.
Speaker 1: You're saying it was good.
Speaker 2: I liked it more than the first really? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: I thought it was really good.
Speaker 3: Okay, Now, the first is always going to be great
Speaker 3: because it's the first, right, I'm not shitting on the
Speaker 3: first one. I'm just saying they did the second one
Speaker 3: as as best they could and it came out great.
Speaker 1: Look, I don't be real.
Speaker 4: There is examples where the second one was done better
Speaker 4: than the first.
Speaker 1: Look at the Mighty Ducks. D two, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: is done way better than D one.
Speaker 4: Okay, American Pie, American Pie two, Terminator two, I think
Speaker 4: it's way better than the original.
Speaker 1: Terminator.
Speaker 4: American Pie two perfect example, is way better in my personal,
Speaker 4: humble opinion, than American Pie one.
Speaker 1: This can be a thing. Scary Movie too.
Speaker 2: Scary Movie two was better than the first.
Speaker 4: Scary Movie two, absolutely, Look, who's to say maybe Mulwana
Speaker 4: two is a banger.
Speaker 2: I'm excited now, Yeah, I thought it was good.
Speaker 1: So anyway, all right.
Speaker 4: We're just that's what got back to that. So like,
Speaker 4: look those islands. China's navy and all, it's so scary
Speaker 4: by by they are now losing sections of their quote
Speaker 4: unquote naval power because their land masses are just drifting
Speaker 4: off into the sea, and so they're feeling some type
Speaker 4: of way about that. Meanwhile, the fucking uh, the whole
Speaker 4: brick system, that system is going wild right now. China
Speaker 4: and India are all there to the verge of war.
Speaker 4: China and India's border dispute in the north. Remember how
Speaker 4: we talked about that. They got a fist fight a
Speaker 4: couple of years ago. They took like boards to each other,
Speaker 4: a couple of people died. Whatever, that's been ramped up
Speaker 4: in very very big ways. They're both sending thousands of
Speaker 4: troops to the border as we speak. It is crazy
Speaker 4: that that's happening all around the same time as this
Speaker 4: other wild shit.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, just who we're.
Speaker 3: In wild times and time will tell how it all
Speaker 3: pans out.
Speaker 2: Maybe it ramps up and it gets even crazier, maybe
Speaker 2: it slows down.
Speaker 3: Maybe we can actually enjoy this Christmas holiday, this Christmas season,
Speaker 3: and and not have to worry about nuclear war or
Speaker 3: foreign conflict or any of that other kind of shit.
Speaker 3: I would like to be able to open up presents
Speaker 3: on Christmas Day and be like, Oh, I love the
Speaker 3: look on my kid's face whenever they open up presents.
Speaker 2: It's a beautiful thing. Like I would love to be
Speaker 2: able to experience that I do not have to worry.
Speaker 2: That'd be nice.
Speaker 4: Do you just you personally, and I think me and
Speaker 4: you probably disagree on this, Do you actually, realistically and
Speaker 4: your heart of hearts believe that like we could get nuked,
Speaker 4: like America might have a nuke drop on it. You
Speaker 4: do you actually fully believe that that's a possibility.
Speaker 2: Yeah? Really Yeah, And maybe not for like logical reasons,
Speaker 2: but dude, it was so weird the other night. I
Speaker 2: was falling asleep and I you know, I don't think
Speaker 2: about war. I don't think about nukes. I'm not somebody that,
Speaker 2: even for the most part, even cares about politics. Like
Speaker 2: this is literally the only time I talk about Paul
Speaker 2: Is on this show. You'll know, I don't talk about
Speaker 2: it with anybody else. I really don't care to talk
Speaker 2: about it.
Speaker 3: But the other night, and this is gonna be so stupid,
Speaker 3: but the other night, I was getting ready to fall asleep,
Speaker 3: and as soon as I was getting ready to fall asleep,
Speaker 3: I had like one of those like a mini dream
Speaker 3: right before you fall asleep kind of situation, and I
Speaker 3: just remember there being like a super nuke dropped in
Speaker 3: a super mushroom cloud just forming over that, and I
Speaker 3: was like, what the fuck.
Speaker 1: That was out of nowhere?
Speaker 4: The DNT hits you, bro, I'm hoping, well, extra dripp
Speaker 4: it's hit that brain stem.
Speaker 3: I don't know, but I'm hoping that was not prophetic.
Speaker 3: That's all I'm gonna say.
Speaker 4: Oh man, Okay, okay, so that's why you believe.
Speaker 3: But no, I also don't think that it's out of
Speaker 3: the realm of possibility.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 3: I mean, if we are the great experiment, dude, think
Speaker 3: about it. The United States of America was always an
Speaker 3: experiment to start and.
Speaker 1: The experiment, Yeah.
Speaker 3: They're fucking always experien demanding on us COVID vaccine.
Speaker 2: That's all you need to know, right, I'm wish you.
Speaker 3: And so if we just so happened to get out
Speaker 3: of hand, why wouldn't they nuke it.
Speaker 2: Like to be honest, like, if you're.
Speaker 1: Somebody who they would nuke us, our government would nuke us.
Speaker 3: I oh, if we are going to get nuked, it's
Speaker 3: because either our own government nuked us or they allowed
Speaker 3: somebody else to nuke us.
Speaker 2: For sure.
Speaker 4: Okay, that's where I'm getting at here. Nothing that's going
Speaker 4: to be I should have framed my question differently. None's
Speaker 4: gonna get caught off guard. No, okay, okay, all right,
Speaker 4: fair enough, fair enough, that's okay.
Speaker 1: For that hypothetical, I could see.
Speaker 4: That America nuking itself, which it's done accidentally a few times,
Speaker 4: but like with intention. Okay, now, why would they do that?
Speaker 4: What would be the precursor?
Speaker 1: Who knows? Whatever? I could see where you're coming from.
Speaker 4: And if we were to get nuked by somebody else,
Speaker 4: you're saying, it would have to be allowed because of
Speaker 4: all of our defenses and all of our stuff and
Speaker 4: all that, like it would one hundred percent be like
Speaker 4: a false flag or actually a real real thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we got the biggest dick.
Speaker 3: And to be like think about it, like we we
Speaker 3: blamed nine to eleven on you know, Middle Eastern countries
Speaker 3: and shit like that, that happened because of us. If
Speaker 3: it was somebody, and I don't I believe that it
Speaker 3: was us. But if it was another country that did it,
Speaker 3: it's because we allowed it.
Speaker 2: I firmly believe that.
Speaker 4: Sure, Yeah, okay, I can't disagree with the Jonathan, I
Speaker 4: can't I but I do have to say that as
Speaker 4: far as all of the saber rattling from all of
Speaker 4: the leaders from around the world, I don't think we
Speaker 4: have anything to worry about about us getting nuked from anybody,
Speaker 4: us getting wrapped into World War three. Sure, that's a
Speaker 4: real concern. And again I've said it before in this.
Speaker 1: When you start seeing.
Speaker 4: Recruiting commercials on on regular television and when they start
Speaker 4: including white guys in it, No, no, I'm just gonna be real,
Speaker 4: that's typically a sign like we're probably getting ready to
Speaker 4: go to war. And recruitment numbers are really down right now,
Speaker 4: not even for wartime numbers. I think the Navy for
Speaker 4: this year is like twenty two thousand lower than what
Speaker 4: they were hoping for. That's just one group, like all
Speaker 4: of them are feeling this and it's Uh, I'm gonna
Speaker 4: be honest, I don't know what to expect, but I
Speaker 4: could see them trying really hard to make joining the
Speaker 4: military look like a good idea for a lot of people.
Speaker 3: I just think the desperate times call for desperate measures.
Speaker 3: They've they've tried to take out Trump multiple times. They
Speaker 3: have tried to poison a lot of us with their
Speaker 3: COVID vaccines. They tried to say that that COVID wasn't
Speaker 3: generated in a lab. Turns out it actually came from
Speaker 3: the White House just a couple of days ago, that yes, it.
Speaker 2: Was determined to come from a lab in China. And
Speaker 2: it's like.
Speaker 1: Shocker, who could have ever seen that coming? Oh?
Speaker 3: Man, like, bro, what exactly? So you're just looking at
Speaker 3: not only the attempt on a president's life that would
Speaker 3: turn things around and against the new World order, but
Speaker 3: also the attempt of making everybody sick with a chemical
Speaker 3: that was formed in a bio lab so that big
Speaker 3: Pharma would be able to make a lot of money
Speaker 3: on the medicine that would kill even more people. And
Speaker 3: it's like, of course, like it nothing would surprise me.
Speaker 1: Nothing.
Speaker 3: I don't think that you can be one hundred percent
Speaker 3: sure that like the global powers are just.
Speaker 2: Going to let this happen. That's my stance on it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, nah, I'm with you. I'm with you.
Speaker 4: So it's a wild time to be alive, good cult members,
Speaker 4: and that's why we do what we do so that
Speaker 4: we can bring you not the news. We're not talking
Speaker 4: news here, people, We're talking about intentions. We're talking about
Speaker 4: looking at the third eye all the way open and
Speaker 4: seeing the reality for what it is and talking about
Speaker 4: on this open form, debate, hypothetical, looking at things.
Speaker 1: And that's what we do here.
Speaker 4: And if you enjoyed this conversation, our take on things,
Speaker 4: or maybe you would like to join in the conversation
Speaker 4: and your own right.
Speaker 1: Please at this time, hit the five stars.
Speaker 4: Hit the shares, the like, subscribe to comments, leave a
Speaker 4: post three for review, shares, hit their friends of family shares.
Speaker 1: If we're here's the deal.
Speaker 4: The more activity the algorithm sees across all of our
Speaker 4: listening platforms, the more we get promoted to more potential
Speaker 4: listeners who could then become potential cult.
Speaker 1: Members like the rest of you. Fine ladies and gentlemen, we.
Speaker 4: Thank If everybody's already gone and done so, and why
Speaker 4: you're at it, go check out Metal Mysteries. Give him
Speaker 4: the five stars, the loves, and all the positive reviews.
Speaker 1: Go check out the YouTube channel Cajua Knights.
Speaker 4: Give me the subscribe to the shares to hit the belt
Speaker 4: notification all the things we.
Speaker 1: Thank you for. Everybody's already gone and done so.
Speaker 3: And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode
Speaker 3: of the Cults of Conspiracy. And my name's Jonathan, I'm
Speaker 3: Jacob and there's one very importing, extremely vital piece of
Speaker 3: information we need you to learn just as soon as
Speaker 3: humanly possible.
Speaker 4: Hey, cult members, Jacob here just want to ask who
Speaker 4: wants better sex? The best way to get started is
Speaker 4: to go to Adam and Eve dot com right now.
Speaker 4: Abim eve is offering fifty percent off just about any item,
Speaker 4: but that's not all. When you get one item, they
Speaker 4: will also send three bonus sexy items and six free movies.
Speaker 4: They offered a screen shipping as your privacy is a priority.
Speaker 4: Plus free shipping on your entire order. Doesn't matter how
Speaker 4: much you spend or what you buy. All we packaged
Speaker 4: and sent discreetly for free. That's fifty percent off one
Speaker 4: item and ten free gifts to boot bring more pleasure
Speaker 4: and satisfaction into your bedroom. Just go to Adam and
Speaker 4: Eve dot com and select any one item. It could
Speaker 4: be an adventurous new toy or anything you desire. Just
Speaker 4: enter the offer code CULT at checkout and you'll get
Speaker 4: fifty percent off almost any item, plus ten free gifts,
Speaker 4: three bonus items, six free movies, and free shipping.
Speaker 1: Use the offer code.
Speaker 4: CULT that see ult at Adammani dot com. Now, this
Speaker 4: is an exclusive offer specific to this podcast, so be
Speaker 4: sure to use this code to get you not just
Speaker 4: the discount and the free goodies, but also the one
Speaker 4: hundred percent free shipping with the code CULT