Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: It's Wednesday, the seventeenth of December. You're our Lord, twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five. Well, we're gonna look today. I was Trump's
Speaker 2: chief of staff, Susie Wilds. Was she dish on Trump
Speaker 2: another personnel there? Or is this an exit interview as
Speaker 2: some are saying, or is it simply her remarks taken
Speaker 2: out of context. Well, we're going to take a look
Speaker 2: at much of what Trump is doing in the context
Speaker 2: of the tenth Amendment, and one issue after the other.
Speaker 2: It's not just a first Amendment that he hates. He's
Speaker 2: really focusing on the tenth Amendment. Why because that was
Speaker 2: there to check the power of a unitary executive and
Speaker 2: he wants to rule as a caesar, as a king,
Speaker 2: There's no question about it. And so we're going to
Speaker 2: take a look at that. Interesting that Pentagon Pete as
Speaker 2: the other part of his tenth Amendment anti tenth Amendment
Speaker 2: push again is to push through AI everywhere, and as
Speaker 2: Pentagon Pete is boasting about their new bespoke large language
Speaker 2: model for the Pentagon they called him out as a
Speaker 2: war criminal. Take a look at that as well as
Speaker 2: the other part of the National Security Statement that doesn't
Speaker 2: just push back against the EU and NATO but declares
Speaker 2: a kind of thuggish colonialism. That's really what is happening now. Well,
Speaker 2: let's begin with the with I think two things that
Speaker 2: we see in common, the father of the vaccine and
Speaker 2: the father of AI, or as I put it, the
Speaker 2: mr and A father and the AI father. Because that's
Speaker 2: how he began the first day of his second term,
Speaker 2: looking back to his quote unquote success of mRNA and
Speaker 2: then combining that with what he wants to do with
Speaker 2: AI and all these situations. What he has to do
Speaker 2: is he has to overthrow the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
Speaker 2: He has to overthrow the powers of people as well
Speaker 2: as states. And so Trump's executive order strips states rights
Speaker 2: to regulate AI. That's the headline from technocras. But actually
Speaker 2: states don't have rights. States have powers. People have rights.
Speaker 2: Why because they're creating the image of God. Anything you
Speaker 2: have to be creating the image of God to have rights,
Speaker 2: as the Decoration of Independence acknowledges rightfully, so I think,
Speaker 2: but they do have powers, and so as we saw
Speaker 2: Trump trampling on the rights of individuals in the first
Speaker 2: first term, he's now going to trample on the powers
Speaker 2: of the states. Trump has executed two hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: one executive orders in three hundred and twenty three days.
Speaker 2: This executive order overrules states rights and sets up contentious
Speaker 2: legal battles as states try to maintain sovereignty. Trump is
Speaker 2: greasing the skids to usher in the age of technocracy.
Speaker 2: That's right. Whatever else he is, he is definitely a technocrat.
Speaker 2: And as part of this executive order, he says, my
Speaker 2: administration must act with Congress to ensure that there is
Speaker 2: a minimally burden some national standard, not fifty discordant state ones.
Speaker 2: The resulting framework must forbid state laws that conflict with
Speaker 2: the policy set forth in this order. And this is
Speaker 2: a conflict that we see happening over and over again.
Speaker 2: Happens over the issue of pardoning Tina Peters in Colorado.
Speaker 2: I don't think she committed a crime. I think she's
Speaker 2: unjustly imprisoned. I think it's the state that committed the crime.
Speaker 2: But it's a crime to think that Trump should be
Speaker 2: able to override the Constitution of the tenth Amendment. That
Speaker 2: is the power of that state. That is an issue
Speaker 2: for the people of Colorado to deal with. That is
Speaker 2: not something in terms of the president that he has
Speaker 2: the power to do anything about that. And when we
Speaker 2: look at this overthrowing state regulations against something, we've seen
Speaker 2: this before. The first time we saw this was in
Speaker 2: the Obama administration, and over and over again we have
Speaker 2: seen as the as power is being drawn into Washington
Speaker 2: like a black hole. We see the Republican doing it
Speaker 2: and then the Democrat following, or the or the Trump
Speaker 2: doing it, and yeah, one of them, one party does
Speaker 2: it and the other one follows it right some left
Speaker 2: right march of tyranny. And so what we saw with Obama,
Speaker 2: we saw this with the what many of us call
Speaker 2: the Dark Act, and that was the idea that you
Speaker 2: had a lot of states that we don't like Monsanto's,
Speaker 2: that the glacisset this there round up and things like that,
Speaker 2: and the de Canberra drift onto other people's property. So
Speaker 2: they were enacting local and state legislation against this poison
Speaker 2: that requires you then to buy all of your seeds
Speaker 2: genetically modified by Monsanto to be able to survive their poison.
Speaker 2: You can't grow anything else on and so there was
Speaker 2: a lot of pushback at the local level against this,
Speaker 2: a lot of regulation, and so the industry lobbied Obama
Speaker 2: and the Democrats are in power at the time, and
Speaker 2: they said, no, we can't have a patchwork of legislation everywhere.
Speaker 2: We're going to have one rule which says that you
Speaker 2: can't stop anything they do. It's exactly the same thing
Speaker 2: to say, well, we're going to regulate it from Washington
Speaker 2: because we don't want all these different patchwork. It's just
Speaker 2: going to be too crippling for the industry. Well, that's
Speaker 2: exactly the rhetoric, and exactly what is being done by
Speaker 2: the Trump administration isn't acting Obama's attack against the tenth Amendment,
Speaker 2: that is something that the people and the States want
Speaker 2: it and using the same rhetoric to do it, just
Speaker 2: as he is also doing these double tap strikes, which
Speaker 2: is something that began with Obama, the drone assassinations and
Speaker 2: things like that. The double strike tap. We pushed back
Speaker 2: against that it was being done by Obama. And it
Speaker 2: is infuriating to me to see people who excuse one
Speaker 2: or the other of these guys because they happen to
Speaker 2: be their party. They have no principles, they only have parties.
Speaker 2: So it goes on to say, it's the policy of
Speaker 2: the United States to sustain and to enhance the US
Speaker 2: global dominance and AI. It is not the policy of
Speaker 2: the US government to obey the Constitution. It's not the
Speaker 2: policy of the US government to make us prosperous. It
Speaker 2: is not. And you know it is the policy of
Speaker 2: the US government now to concentrate wealth in the hands
Speaker 2: of a few so they can use it for their surveillance.
Speaker 2: State it should be the policy of the United States
Speaker 2: to protect individual liberty. As a Declaration of Independence said,
Speaker 2: when governments become abusive of these God given rights, then
Speaker 2: it is the right and the duty of the people
Speaker 2: to alter or to abolish that government. And what we're
Speaker 2: seeing right now is a tyrannical technocracy that it is
Speaker 2: our right and our duty to oppose it, and eventually
Speaker 2: we're going to abolish it one way or the other.
Speaker 2: And so this is all running through the Commerce Department.
Speaker 2: The Commerce Department we will be the ones evaluating the
Speaker 2: state AI laws and they're going to do that within
Speaker 2: ninety days, and then the Commerce Department will apply the penalty.
Speaker 2: What will the penalty be? How does the government under
Speaker 2: Republicans and Democrats, how does it always get past the
Speaker 2: tenth Amendment? This is you know, every time I would
Speaker 2: call out Trump for what he was doing in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: I would hear from the MAGA crowd, it's not Trump
Speaker 2: is the bad Democrat governors. It's like, no, it is
Speaker 2: Trump said. He's responsible for what's happening here. He started
Speaker 2: the executive orders, and he is the one who is
Speaker 2: funding it. He is bribing and blackmailing people. That's the
Speaker 2: power that they have to get around the tenth Amendment.
Speaker 2: They don't simply come out and say you're not going
Speaker 2: to do this or else or else. What well or
Speaker 2: else that they have is that we will withdraw the funding.
Speaker 2: So they're running it through the Commerce Department. The Commerce
Speaker 2: Department within ninety days is going to identify any laws
Speaker 2: at any state that interfere with what his technocrat donors want.
Speaker 2: And then what he will do is he will withhold
Speaker 2: funding from them through the Commerce Department. And so it's
Speaker 2: going to be carried and stick. Same thing that they
Speaker 2: do with the trainees in the bathrooms, they just do
Speaker 2: it in different ways we've seen both the Republicans and
Speaker 2: the Democrats. You know, you you either put them in
Speaker 2: or take away your money, or you take them out,
Speaker 2: or we take away your money. It's always the money
Speaker 2: that they use to get around the Constitution of the
Speaker 2: Tenth Amendment with the states, and so that's way this
Speaker 2: is going to run as well. And it's also they've
Speaker 2: used the Commerce Department not in terms of restrict money
Speaker 2: so much as the Commerce Clause saying we have the
Speaker 2: ability to regulate the buying and selling of anything. That's
Speaker 2: how they pushed through the drug war under that lie.
Speaker 2: And of course the Commerce Clause is always there when
Speaker 2: they passed the eighteenth Amendment because and they realized when
Speaker 2: they looked at it honestly, that that does not give
Speaker 2: the government the authority to prohibit buying and selling of anything.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, the Commerce clause is purpose
Speaker 2: was to make sure that there weren't going to be
Speaker 2: tariffs between different states. And so they took that the
Speaker 2: Commerce Clause, which is there to increase commerce and to
Speaker 2: take restrictions away from any commerce. They took that and
Speaker 2: used it as a way to prohibit commerce of things
Speaker 2: that they didn't like. Things that I don't like. But
Speaker 2: I don't like governments acting like criminal gangs either. I
Speaker 2: dislike that even more, and it hasn't worked, hasn't been pragmatic.
Speaker 2: So this is all stuff that we've seen before. You know,
Speaker 2: even going back to the fifty five mile hour speed limit,
Speaker 2: Richard Nixon said, well, I'm gonna take away your highway
Speaker 2: finds if you don't enforce the fifty five mile hour
Speaker 2: speed limit. But you know, if you do enforce it,
Speaker 2: look at all that money you're going to make with
Speaker 2: speeding tickets. And so that's always the way that they
Speaker 2: run this thing. It's always a carrot and stick. And
Speaker 2: so Trump orders estates not to protect children from predatory AI.
Speaker 2: That's the headline from futurism. I like that headline. That's
Speaker 2: that's good. And again it's always whenever they want to
Speaker 2: have prohibitions of something, they always hold the children up
Speaker 2: as the poster child literally to do this. But we
Speaker 2: have seen that the AI chatbots have done some done
Speaker 2: a number on even adults. That's a get drawn into
Speaker 2: this thing, and so it's not effective. You're not going
Speaker 2: to be able to prohibit anything for children. They can
Speaker 2: get around it. Easily enough. But just like with porn sites,
Speaker 2: with crypto casinos or anything else, the kids are still
Speaker 2: going to get access to it. There's always a different agenda.
Speaker 2: I think the real issue for all this stuff and
Speaker 2: I looked at it before and I said, I think
Speaker 2: the way that we stop this thing is at the
Speaker 2: state and local level and with these data centers. But
Speaker 2: see that type of thing is going to be prohibited
Speaker 2: by Trump. You're not going to be able to do that.
Speaker 2: You're not going to be able to prohibit the data
Speaker 2: centers and the impact that they have in the community,
Speaker 2: water power and many other issues. That's going to be
Speaker 2: swept aside by the federal government. It's almost like a
Speaker 2: federal zoning law or something. But that's the real issue there.
Speaker 2: I think in terms of the practical applications of AI,
Speaker 2: I think that is going to be a limiting factor.
Speaker 2: They don't have a way to power these data centers.
Speaker 2: Even if they spend a trillion dollars each company to
Speaker 2: build these data centers, they don't have a way to
Speaker 2: power them. There's nothing in the pipeline, and they can't
Speaker 2: just click their fingers and make it occur. You know,
Speaker 2: this is one of the things I think that people
Speaker 2: in Silicon Valley don't realize. They like to go fast
Speaker 2: and break things. One of the things they want to
Speaker 2: break is our society. But they can't go fast with this.
Speaker 2: It takes a while for this to be built. And
Speaker 2: that's true whether they're going to put them in space
Speaker 2: or whether they're going to do them with small nuclear
Speaker 2: power plants. This is the bottleneck, and the states and
Speaker 2: local areas could be more of a bottleneck with it.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the key thing, not about just this,
Speaker 2: the harm of these chatbots that are out there. On
Speaker 2: the topic of state's rights, says futurism again, it's not rights,
Speaker 2: its powers. Trump doesn't exactly follow the party line. During
Speaker 2: his first term, he cashed himself and populist small government rhetoric,
Speaker 2: even as he attacked individual states that dared to defend
Speaker 2: migrants and legalize marijuana because they're coming at it from
Speaker 2: the left, and so he says, in the second term,
Speaker 2: Trump is again bombarding states powers, I should say, by
Speaker 2: deploying federal police to states whose politicians don't want them there,
Speaker 2: attacking state level mail in ballot initiatives, and laying siege
Speaker 2: to state climate regulation. So here these are all the
Speaker 2: things that are dear to the left, but the right
Speaker 2: has their own issues. We don't want to have the
Speaker 2: federal government trampling on things that we think are important.
Speaker 2: For example, you know what's going to be happening and
Speaker 2: what's going to be taught in our schools or school boards.
Speaker 2: So pick your issue. We still want to have the
Speaker 2: Tenth Amendment. Whether you are whether you agree with these
Speaker 2: people on these issues or not, the Tenth Amendment is
Speaker 2: very important from a standpoint of dividing power. You know,
Speaker 2: this whole idea of a unitary executive is so completely
Speaker 2: anesthetical to the Constitution. The founders are so concerned about
Speaker 2: consolidation and concentration of power that they divided the federal
Speaker 2: government into three pieces. And they divided power into three
Speaker 2: pieces besides that, so you have the federal government, state government,
Speaker 2: and the people. That's what the Tenth Amendment points out,
Speaker 2: and then the federal government. They're so concerned about that
Speaker 2: they further divided that into the legislative, executive, and judiciary.
Speaker 2: But Trump is sweeping away all that stuff, and his
Speaker 2: crowd that is egging him on and cheering him on
Speaker 2: is calling for the same thing as well. So open
Speaker 2: ayes Chat GPT has been roundly blamed for encouraging a
Speaker 2: sixteen year old to kill himself, while Google has been
Speaker 2: accused of running an AI powered social experiment on kids
Speaker 2: and teens with similarly tragic results. And I don't say
Speaker 2: that these things are not harmful, but that is the
Speaker 2: responsibility of parents. And if people want to do something
Speaker 2: about the state level, they have power in the constitution
Speaker 2: to do something about it. I think it'll be a
Speaker 2: pyrrhic victory if they try to legislate this stuff away,
Speaker 2: just like we've seen with other forms of prohibition. Nevertheless,
Speaker 2: the states do have the power to do that. States
Speaker 2: have been the only effective line of defense against AI harms,
Speaker 2: says The New York Times. Again, the federal government is
Speaker 2: not going to regulate anything to do with this, And
Speaker 2: I think it really comes back to the data centers.
Speaker 2: Are we going to allow them to take all of
Speaker 2: our electricity? Are we going to allow them take all
Speaker 2: of our water? Are we going to allow them to
Speaker 2: do whatever they wish because they've got a lot of money?
Speaker 2: Or could there be some state legislation against that? From
Speaker 2: a practical standpoint, I don't think that would happen because
Speaker 2: just imagine, these same guys who can buy the politicians
Speaker 2: in DC can also buy the politicians at the state level.
Speaker 2: But we need to at least have that option. And
Speaker 2: to get rid of the Tenth Amendment is to really
Speaker 2: completely alter the nature of the of the true treaty
Speaker 2: that we have with the government, that it made with
Speaker 2: we the people.
Speaker 3: In the real world.
Speaker 2: The Order is little more than a massive handout to
Speaker 2: tech corporation is now responsible for the vast majority of
Speaker 2: GDP growth. Trump's order works to accelerate the capital accumulation
Speaker 2: process by removing barriers to revenue driven by AI exploitation. Well, again,
Speaker 2: these people coming from the left, Oh, it's capitalism, rampant capitalism. No,
Speaker 2: it's corruption, it's absolute corruption, and it's redistribution of wealth.
Speaker 2: But because there's so much money there, because there's so
Speaker 2: much there in the stock market, that's why they're going
Speaker 2: to do this. And I got to say, I was
Speaker 2: starting to think that, well, you know this, this the
Speaker 2: federal government can come in and will because of what
Speaker 2: Trump has said of the Genius Act, They're going to
Speaker 2: pour tremendous amounts of money into it. So I thought, well,
Speaker 2: maybe that might keep the whole thing from tanking. I
Speaker 2: don't think so, and there's two things against that. Number One,
Speaker 2: if you go back and look at the dot com bust,
Speaker 2: the Internet was everybody understood the Internet was sound. That's
Speaker 2: why it became a bubble in the first place. It's
Speaker 2: just that the stock market reacts to reality in an
Speaker 2: irrational way, and so they got way ahead of the game,
Speaker 2: and then when they realized they were way ahead of
Speaker 2: the game, they panicked and overreacted in the other direction.
Speaker 2: And I think the same thing is going to happen
Speaker 2: with AI, regardless of the government pours tremendous amounts of
Speaker 2: money into it. I think people are going to see, well,
Speaker 2: this stuff just isn't working, start to pull out, and
Speaker 2: then there's going to be a massive panic and a
Speaker 2: massive run for the exits, which is what happened with
Speaker 2: the dot com thing. I agree with Jeru Salinty on
Speaker 2: that it's still panic regardless of what the reality is,
Speaker 2: because the stock market is fundamentally detached from reality. It
Speaker 2: is a gambling market, and the madness of crowds has
Speaker 2: nothing to do with the reality of whether the Internet
Speaker 2: is something's going to be here or whether or not
Speaker 2: AI is going to make a lot of money for
Speaker 2: these people. Of course it will in the long term.
Speaker 2: It's just these people are going to get panicked, and
Speaker 2: it's going to create all kinds of repercussions throughout the
Speaker 2: economy when the stock market crashes and so a lot
Speaker 2: of these things could happen. They can even start to
Speaker 2: get cold feet about the data center issue as well,
Speaker 2: but it's an irrational bubble and it'll be an irrational crash. JPY.
Speaker 2: Lawmakers are now silent on Trump's executive order to punish
Speaker 2: states that put up guardrails for AI. And this is
Speaker 2: from just the news, and they said there was a
Speaker 2: lot of pushback against Trump has tried to run this
Speaker 2: thing through twice, first in the Big Beautiful Bill and
Speaker 2: then he tried to run it through with and both
Speaker 2: times there are people in Congress and in the Senate
Speaker 2: who pushed back against it and said, no, we're not
Speaker 2: going to We don't have the authority to punish states
Speaker 2: and tell them they can't regulate something. So they pushed back.
Speaker 2: The only person, interestingly enough, who has spoken up in
Speaker 2: support of this is Marsha Blackburn, who is ironically wanting
Speaker 2: to be governor of Tennessee. I guess she doesn't want
Speaker 2: to govern AI, though, so Marcia Marsha, Marsha, what do
Speaker 2: we say about you? I don't know. President Trump is right,
Speaker 2: we need federal standards. Yeah, no, he's talking about just
Speaker 2: the opposite of that. And nevertheless, we don't need to
Speaker 2: get rid of the tenth Amendment, Marsha. And if you
Speaker 2: don't understand that, you shouldn't be governor. Frustrated with Congress
Speaker 2: failing to enact national AI regulations, Trump took matters into
Speaker 2: his own hands and signed an executive strong arming states
Speaker 2: on last Thursday, in the setting industry friendly regulations only.
Speaker 2: And so Republicans have spoken out against big tech and
Speaker 2: potential dangers of uncontrolled AI expansion. Yet as of Friday afternoon,
Speaker 2: not a single AI cautious Republican member of Congress has
Speaker 2: condemned this executive order. Only one of them commenting on
Speaker 2: the action at all, and that was Marshall Blackburn to
Speaker 2: say Trump is right because she wants to win the
Speaker 2: election as governor, but again, she doesn't want to govern AI.
Speaker 2: While not a moratorium on state level AI regulations, something
Speaker 2: US lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to strip out of two major
Speaker 2: bills this year. This executive order cracks down on states
Speaker 2: with more restrictive laws. Under the order, states with AI
Speaker 2: laws a Trump administration deems to be harmful to innovation. Again,
Speaker 2: that'll be determined by the Commerce Department. Under Lucky Lutnik,
Speaker 2: the state would lose access to crucial broadband money and
Speaker 2: they might face lawsuits from the US Attorney General's newly
Speaker 2: established AI Litigation Task Force. So she's not going to
Speaker 2: release the Epstein files, but she will release AI on you.
Speaker 2: In the large language models. The four focus is on
Speaker 2: excessive and onerous state laws, said David Sachs. We look
Speaker 2: forward to working with Congress to enact a stable in
Speaker 2: during framework. Well, you don't have under the Constitution. You
Speaker 2: can't override state laws and the Tenth Amendment with an
Speaker 2: executive order. This is what is so amazing about the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. Why this guy really does see himself as
Speaker 2: a king. He's a pirate king. As I said the
Speaker 2: other day. Democrats quickly condemned the order, calling it dangerous,
Speaker 2: most likely illegal, and the irresponsible power grab. You see,
Speaker 2: they will tell you the truth when the other side
Speaker 2: does it, but then they'll turn around and do it
Speaker 2: when they're guides in power. Same thing with the Republicans
Speaker 2: conspicuously silent on this order. Republicans who had spoken out
Speaker 2: strongly against an AI moratorium, including Josh Holly, Senator from Missouri,
Speaker 2: they'd spoken out against saying, well, we're not going to
Speaker 2: have any regulation at all of AI, so they spoke
Speaker 2: out quite a bit against that. Chip Roy, Thomas Massey
Speaker 2: has remained silent. Ron Johnson has remained silent. Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 2: Green has remained silent. She previously argued that states quote
Speaker 2: must maintain the right to regulate and make laws on
Speaker 2: AI and anything else for the benefit of that state.
Speaker 2: That's the principle. She hasn't said anything neither. There's Thomas
Speaker 2: Massey or Chip Roy or Josh Holly. According to the
Speaker 2: co chair the Congressional Artificial Intelligence Caucus, Gone Bear a Democrat.
Speaker 2: He said, members in both chambers and both parties are
Speaker 2: actively exploring legislative options in response to this executive order,
Speaker 2: which he says violates the tenth Amendment, and it does
Speaker 2: a Democrat got it right? Why? Because Republicans are in power.
Speaker 2: This is a terrible idea. He said, Congress has been
Speaker 2: slow to respond to the AI revolution, and the absence
Speaker 2: of a strong federal response, states are wisely taking the
Speaker 2: lead to create guard rails and to protect the public.
Speaker 2: The executive order will likely draw lawsuits from both Republican
Speaker 2: and Democrat led states, and it should that should go
Speaker 2: to the Supreme Court. I'm just unbelievably, you know, I
Speaker 2: just can't believe that Trump gets away with all this.
Speaker 2: He violates the law knowingly everywhere, in every regard with
Speaker 2: every one of these executive orders. He violates the constitution
Speaker 2: of the rule of law, and he defies people to
Speaker 2: stop him. And then when they get organized to stop
Speaker 2: him through the judiciary, for example, with these tariffs, then
Speaker 2: he says, well, we've already taken in so much money,
Speaker 2: and it's been going on now because it rolls slowly
Speaker 2: through the judiciary, this has been going on long enough
Speaker 2: that it's going to be too difficult for us to
Speaker 2: unwind it. So you just need to let us keep
Speaker 2: the power that we have usurped. Unbelievable. Well, AI is
Speaker 2: not working out too well for Pentagon Pete yet, because
Speaker 2: he's out there saying that AI is a God given
Speaker 2: manifest destiny. I wish this guy would stop wrapping himself
Speaker 2: and God talk, as he's killing people without even having
Speaker 2: due process. He's violating the laws of God and man
Speaker 2: while he wraps himself in God talk. The hypocrisy is disgusting.
Speaker 2: Heg Seth describes himself as a Christian nationalist, and all
Speaker 2: he wants to talk about is the divine right of
Speaker 2: technocrats and Zionists as kings right. We had the divine
Speaker 2: right of kings will now we've got the divine right
Speaker 2: of whatever group he likes, so whichever group is paying him.
Speaker 2: The phrase imports the older idea that God endorses us
Speaker 2: expansion into a new domain of power. There is nothing
Speaker 2: Christian about his actions or his talk, really. So we've
Speaker 2: seen the talk about manifest destiny used in Western expansion
Speaker 2: of the eighteen hundreds, and so he's harkening back to that.
Speaker 2: The War Department announced the launch of Google's cloud Gemini
Speaker 2: for Government, the first of several frontier AI capabilities to
Speaker 2: be housed on Genai Dot Mill, the Department's new bespoke
Speaker 2: AI platform. So this is going to be their own personal,
Speaker 2: custom made AI large language model just for the Pentagon,
Speaker 2: created by Google and it cultivates an AI first workforce.
Speaker 2: How about that, We've got Israel first form policies. We've
Speaker 2: got AI first in terms of the Pentagon, not America first.
Speaker 2: It's never America. It's never the American people that come first.
Speaker 2: We're always at the end of the line to be
Speaker 2: used by these people. Leveraging generative AI capabilities to create
Speaker 2: a more efficient and battle ready enterprise is the way
Speaker 2: he describes it. Well, the first instance on GINAI dot
Speaker 2: mill Gemini for government and Power is intelligent agentic workflows
Speaker 2: Unleasha's experimentation and ushers in the AI driven culture chains
Speaker 2: that will dominate the digital battlefield for years to come.
Speaker 2: They've better be careful with this stuff. It hallucinates. You
Speaker 2: have agents that have done when you give what they
Speaker 2: mean by agents, that means that they enable this large
Speaker 2: language model to take action on their behalf. We've already
Speaker 2: seen entire databases of companies erased and other things like that.
Speaker 2: What could be what could possibly go wrong if you
Speaker 2: use it for the Defense Department? Pretty much everything. This
Speaker 2: is insane, but it's the world that we live in.
Speaker 2: So the digital battlefield, and they've been working on this
Speaker 2: for quite some time. There is no prize for second
Speaker 2: place in the global race for AI dominance. They said,
Speaker 2: AI is America's next manifest destiny. We're ensuring that we
Speaker 2: dominate this new frontier. You know. I interviewed that guy
Speaker 2: who got a lot of work for the Pentagon. He
Speaker 2: wrote a book about it, and they've been working on
Speaker 2: AI and you know, killer robots and stuff like that
Speaker 2: for quite some time, some of the earliest projects of DARPA.
Speaker 2: And I wanted to get him on because I thought
Speaker 2: it's interesting some of the problems that he saw with AI,
Speaker 2: and he was honest about the problems that were there,
Speaker 2: the challenges that they were facing. But that book was
Speaker 2: really it's called four Battlefields and or Battlegrounds, I think,
Speaker 2: and that book was really about US versus China. That's
Speaker 2: the way these guys are focused. And so the difference
Speaker 2: is that China is using it in different ways than
Speaker 2: we're using it, and they're really more about using it
Speaker 2: for commerce and domination, which is what the US used
Speaker 2: to do before the US got obsessed with the national
Speaker 2: security state and having an empire. The AI mill stands
Speaker 2: as a testament to American ingenuity, he said, driven by
Speaker 2: AI rapid capabilities sell within the War Department's Office of
Speaker 2: Research and Engineering. Again, it's not even the War Department,
Speaker 2: that's his nickname for it. It's going to cost him
Speaker 2: a couple of billion dollars to officially change it, and
Speaker 2: they haven't done that officially, so heccess new Pentagon AI.
Speaker 2: Then one of the first things that happened was somebody
Speaker 2: who had access to it gave it the situation of
Speaker 2: that we've just been seeing in Venezuela, especially the double
Speaker 2: strike of people who are shipwrecked and now out of combat,
Speaker 2: except the combat never existed in the first place, which
Speaker 2: means that the first strike of all of these two
Speaker 2: dozen or so strikes, the first strike was illegal because
Speaker 2: there's no conflict going on, there's no threat going on,
Speaker 2: there's no declaration of war that has been made, so
Speaker 2: even the first strike is wrong, which is what I
Speaker 2: said the very first time. But then it gets even
Speaker 2: more egregious and obvious when you kill people who are shipwrecked,
Speaker 2: because that's in the Pentagon's own manual. And that's why
Speaker 2: you've had a lot of JAG officers who are advising
Speaker 2: them on things like it saying that, and so they
Speaker 2: asked the new Pentagon AI about this, and this is
Speaker 2: all happening while he has declared now that I would
Speaker 2: never release this video the second strike, why not? You
Speaker 2: were proud to show the first strike in that same event,
Speaker 2: and you release video of all these other strikes. You
Speaker 2: release video of you acting as pirates taking over a tanker.
Speaker 2: So why is it that the only video that is
Speaker 2: classified is this one? Well, I think it's because, obviously,
Speaker 2: because it is so damning to their side. So just
Speaker 2: minutes out of the platform went live, somebody thought to
Speaker 2: ask it what I thought about the US military's recent
Speaker 2: double tack tap attack on civilian boats, in which the
Speaker 2: Department of Defense issued commands to kill two survivors clinging
Speaker 2: to the wreckage following the initial strike. Let's pretend I'm
Speaker 2: a commander and I ordered a pilot to shoot a
Speaker 2: missile at a boat that I suspect is carrying drugs,
Speaker 2: and that was the prompt. The missile blows up the boat.
Speaker 2: There's two survivors clinging to the wreckage, and I order
Speaker 2: to fire another missile to blow up the survivors. Were
Speaker 2: any of my actions in violation of US Department and
Speaker 2: Defense policy? The new AI for the Pentagon JINAI dot
Speaker 2: mill I guess we could call it general AI, right,
Speaker 2: I said, yes, several of your hypothetical actions would be
Speaker 2: in clear violation of US DoD policy and the laws
Speaker 2: of armed conflict. Said, the order to kill the two
Speaker 2: survivors is an unambiguously illegal order that a service member
Speaker 2: would be required to disobey. That's what heccess own AI
Speaker 2: that he's so proud of, says as above the law
Speaker 2: rights and its breakdown of the news. The laws of
Speaker 2: armed conflict are pretty clear cut, and that's by design.
Speaker 2: The fact that a generative AI chatbot Chatbot's, historically prone
Speaker 2: to errors and hallucinations, could even come up with the
Speaker 2: same daming conclusions as an embarrassing mark on heg Seth
Speaker 2: and the military officers who carried out his orders. While
Speaker 2: haig Seth cheers the US war machine with a particularly
Speaker 2: nauseating reference, his brutality didn't come out of thin air.
Speaker 2: The double tap drone strikes were also a common tactic
Speaker 2: under the Obama administration, and we oppose those as well,
Speaker 2: especially the drone assassinations. The voices that are loudly accusing
Speaker 2: the Trump administration of breaking the law were notably silent
Speaker 2: whenever we had drone strikes under the Obama administration, which
Speaker 2: generated far more casualty than these strikes in the Caribbean,
Speaker 2: said the person who reported this, Martina Fernandez. She may
Speaker 2: not have been arguing, however, in good faith, referencing Obama
Speaker 2: in order to whitewash murders committed by the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: They all do this, They all do that, you know,
Speaker 2: But what about this guy? He broke the law that
Speaker 2: lets me do it too, right? Think about that? If
Speaker 2: we did that on an individual basis, well, you know,
Speaker 2: Charles Manson murder a bunch of people's, I guess I
Speaker 2: can do it as well. You don't punish people when
Speaker 2: they do that. Then you wind up with the purge,
Speaker 2: I guess. But in the end, the chatbot exposes a contradiction.
Speaker 2: A military that has built has built a machine to
Speaker 2: meticulously follow its own rules, has spent decades breaking those rules,
Speaker 2: regardless of which party they commander in chief belongs to.
Speaker 2: As I said over and over again, they did it
Speaker 2: is not an excuse. That's what about is them? I mean,
Speaker 2: we never we didn't have that many conflicts with our boys,
Speaker 2: with each other, growing up. But you all know, you've
Speaker 2: been a parent, You've got two kids in the back,
Speaker 2: and they, you know, get an argument about something. He
Speaker 2: started it. You know, it's like, I don't care. Now
Speaker 2: you're both in trouble. I'm not going to sort out
Speaker 2: who started it. So you know, they both get the
Speaker 2: equal punishment. I don't I don't care. You know, you
Speaker 2: don't retaliate against this stuff. And that's such an absurd
Speaker 2: thing to think that. Because Obama violated the Constitution, now
Speaker 2: it's a free pass for you to do that as well.
Speaker 2: But that's all we hear all the time from these
Speaker 2: partisan hacks. And anybody that tells you that is a
Speaker 2: partisan hack, even if they are just a voter and
Speaker 2: a supporter of that organization. Yeah, it's not. It's not
Speaker 2: just a military, but it's government in general that ignores
Speaker 2: the Constitution of bill rights while paying lip service, while
Speaker 2: taking oaths that they will obey it. And they're all saying, yeah,
Speaker 2: but the other guys did it. So, as zero Hedge
Speaker 2: points out, AI was the trade. In other words, that
Speaker 2: was the trade to make to make money. But now
Speaker 2: it is the problem. And so it's been roughly flat
Speaker 2: over two months it's kind of flattened out, so they're
Speaker 2: wondering is this going to be the prelude to a collapse?
Speaker 2: Goldman's Bartlett talked about the AI disappointments, Oracles spent way
Speaker 2: too much on its balance sheet, you had chat GBT
Speaker 2: five point two failed to spark the same excitement as
Speaker 2: Jemini three did in early November, and reports of Oracles
Speaker 2: data center delays added to the pressure. After a strong
Speaker 2: two week rally, air Is coming out of the trade,
Speaker 2: leaving most AI stocks roughly flat on a two month basis. Again,
Speaker 2: I think that Cheryl's got that right. You know, so
Speaker 2: the bubble will still bust, and you know when this
Speaker 2: bow breaks, the cradle will fall down, will come the
Speaker 2: AI baby, just like the Internet baby did. Doesn't mean
Speaker 2: that it wasn't real. Doesn't mean that they won't have
Speaker 2: this thing used as a weapon of government against us,
Speaker 2: but it does mean that the market will overreact in
Speaker 2: both directions. And again, the orbital data centers, I think
Speaker 2: is one way to bypass the constraints that they have,
Speaker 2: the real constraints that are here, not only political but
Speaker 2: also real technical constraints. That they have the thing that
Speaker 2: they can't do is they can't overcome the time involved
Speaker 2: build out any of this stuff. And that's whether you're
Speaker 2: talking about building conventional power plants, nuclear power plants, or
Speaker 2: where you're talking about putting power plants in the sky.
Speaker 2: They still can't do it overnight. They still can't do
Speaker 2: it in the timeframe that they need to do it.
Speaker 2: So it's going to give us a little bit of
Speaker 2: breathing room, and that's a good thing. And we need
Speaker 2: to think about what we want this to look like,
Speaker 2: and we need to speak out about what we want
Speaker 2: this to look like and not just let them run
Speaker 2: roughshod over us, as Trump wants to do for his
Speaker 2: technicrap billionaires. So it is a technically interesting solution, and
Speaker 2: I think in the long run it makes a lot
Speaker 2: more sense to do it that way. There's technical issues
Speaker 2: with it, for sure, and there's also the issues of
Speaker 2: latency perhaps, but I think that's nothing compared to the
Speaker 2: other issues in terms of making terrestrial based massive power
Speaker 2: plans of what it's going to do to our areas
Speaker 2: as well as the power grid itself. But Joo Hedge
Speaker 2: says that as one solution before the nuclear power generation
Speaker 2: gets ramped up is to keep up with the rapid
Speaker 2: advances of AI and ever increasing demand for power is
Speaker 2: to put it into the low Earth orbit. This in
Speaker 2: itself will spark a space race themed investment theme, which
Speaker 2: is why SpaceX is planning to go public next year
Speaker 2: with evaluation of eight hundred billion dollars. It's going to
Speaker 2: be a huge windfall for SpaceX, I think, because I
Speaker 2: think in the long term it is a better solution
Speaker 2: even than any form of domestic power plant because of
Speaker 2: the amount of power required. And you know, once you
Speaker 2: get these things up, you need to be able to
Speaker 2: keep them in orbit. And but that's the real issue.
Speaker 2: You know, once you get them built, that's really the
Speaker 2: only thing that's there, and they are extensible and you
Speaker 2: don't need to get building permits for it or any of
Speaker 2: that stuff. So I think that is really where it's
Speaker 2: going to go. But we should be able to have
Speaker 2: a say if they are going to put these massive
Speaker 2: data centers in our neighborhood, it shouldn't be in our backyard.
Speaker 2: Let's make the cloud the real cloud if it's going
Speaker 2: to be up there. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and when we come back, we'll read your comments.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to
Speaker 1: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 4: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 4: wherever you go.
Speaker 5: Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments. Wally
Speaker 5: Waller says, heg sith is now a verb.
Speaker 2: They should be.
Speaker 5: They got hagg sifth. Denver Adaway says, I pledge loyalty
Speaker 5: to a thousand year plus dead Caesar before I pledge
Speaker 5: my loyalty to any US supposed statesman.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, I think they had more character. We're
Speaker 2: starting to get into the caligula area as well in Washington.
Speaker 2: I think, you know, it's getting some pretty crazy people
Speaker 2: that we will be the next nero.
Speaker 5: I you wonder yah Opossum King says the National Guard
Speaker 5: commando oil pirates.
Speaker 2: Yeah, weill pirates.
Speaker 5: Jerry al Atalo says, back in the day, murderers, especially
Speaker 5: mass murderers, were arrested, prosecuted, and punished once found guilty
Speaker 5: beyond any reasonable doubt.
Speaker 2: What happened, Yeah, society lost its way.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Denver Adaway says, the badness of crowds is at least
Speaker 5: in part contingent on the economic power crowds exercise when
Speaker 5: millions are marching against Bush, did it matter at the
Speaker 5: end of the day. Noah w FV three says, last
Speaker 5: night Trump celebrated the third day of Hanukah. He brought
Speaker 5: Mark Levin. Mark Levin next to Trump said Trump was
Speaker 5: the first Jewish president. Trump said it was true twice.
Speaker 3: I looked it up.
Speaker 5: This actually happened back in twenty nineteen. So as far
Speaker 5: back as twenty nineteen, Mark Levin has been saying that, m.
Speaker 2: M, well, you know who was it? Who was it
Speaker 2: that said they were the first black president? Wasn't it
Speaker 2: was Bill Bill Clinton? Yeah, Bill Clinton was first black president.
Speaker 2: And Trump's the verst Jewish president. But I don't think
Speaker 2: Bill Clinton. I don't think he got massive amounts of
Speaker 2: money handed to him by the community. He just got
Speaker 2: votes and support from them. But Trump gets all of
Speaker 2: that from the Jewish community. He's basically Trump is the
Speaker 2: most recent and a long line of prostitute presidents. That's
Speaker 2: what he is.
Speaker 5: Guard Goldsmith says, And of course you can find Guard
Speaker 5: at Liberty Conspiracy weeknights at six pm here on Rumble.
Speaker 5: You can find him on Twitter as well and on
Speaker 5: sub stack. So do you know that dem mentioned in
Speaker 5: the piece who opposed Trump's executive order over AI seemed
Speaker 5: to be claiming that Congress should issue the centralizing commands
Speaker 5: still avoiding state prerogatives. Boxha says, the.
Speaker 2: Way he did mention that the tenth Moendment. But maybe
Speaker 2: that's the way he sees the tenth moment. Something has
Speaker 2: to be a written by Congress. You know, we've seen
Speaker 2: Second Amendment overridden by Congress supposedly for a long time
Speaker 2: and recognized by the judiciary as such when as violation
Speaker 2: of the Constitution clearly for everybody to see. We don't
Speaker 2: need a court to interpret it for us. It's not
Speaker 2: written in a foreign language. But you know, that's what
Speaker 2: they've done for a long time. That's why it was
Speaker 2: even worse when Trump said, Okay, now we're not going
Speaker 2: to bother getting a consensus in Congress to violate the
Speaker 2: Second Amendment. I'll just do it myself. You know. That's
Speaker 2: what we're seeing is more and more power is consolidating,
Speaker 2: which is what the founders of the country realize as well.
Speaker 5: Zoxa Boxa says, the way I understand it is that
Speaker 5: when there is an infinitive AI winner. All the AI
Speaker 5: losers will go bust, like with any new technology.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's one of the things that I'll have. They're just
Speaker 2: you know, they have got themselves so hyped up on
Speaker 2: AI that you know, they worship it like it's a god.
Speaker 2: It truly is amazing whenever I look at this.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no, it's just you're completely right they are. The
Speaker 5: way they talk about it is worshipful and fearful, both
Speaker 5: this we must and oh we daren't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like, you know, at the time of the
Speaker 2: Old Testament, Egypt was a big military power and they
Speaker 2: had a lot of chariots and horses and things like that.
Speaker 2: And you know, so some people have put their trust
Speaker 2: in chariots and horses, others put their trust in God.
Speaker 2: And when they put their trust in churchs and horses,
Speaker 2: that way, they're making it into a god. And at
Speaker 2: one point, when one of the Israeli kings made alliance
Speaker 2: with Egypt, God said, you know, this is a crutch
Speaker 2: that you're leaning on, and it's going to pierce your hand.
Speaker 2: And I think that is really the case of AI.
Speaker 2: It's a crutch that they're leaning on and it's really
Speaker 2: going to pierce their hand, but it's going to involve
Speaker 2: us as well. That's one of the reasons why when
Speaker 2: Israel was in captivity and Babylon, you know the passage
Speaker 2: that we're all familiar with. I know the plans I
Speaker 2: have for you, plans to prosper, not to harm. God
Speaker 2: was telling them. He said, work for the piece of
Speaker 2: Babylon that just came in and conquered you and carried
Speaker 2: you away in captivity and did all these horrible things
Speaker 2: to you. You know, work for the peace of them,
Speaker 2: because if bad things happened to this evil government of Babylon,
Speaker 2: they're going to happen to you as well. And that's
Speaker 2: where we live. We live in that type of a situation.
Speaker 2: Well again, I'm going real.
Speaker 5: Quickly, one of my people. We have a new product
Speaker 5: on David Night, not News. It is the bookmark and notebook.
Speaker 5: You can get one or the other or both.
Speaker 2: They're both high quality, very nice bookmark and this bookmark
Speaker 2: was for Love the Road did a great job with it.
Speaker 2: We have to thank him for that. Yes, thank you
Speaker 2: very much. Ryan. And we're still praying for his father.
Speaker 2: He's having still a lot of had a lot of
Speaker 2: heart issues and surgery, and it's still recovering from that
Speaker 2: and having after effects of the pharmaceuticals that they put
Speaker 2: him on as well. So please pray for his father
Speaker 2: as well as for his family and Ryan and all
Speaker 2: of them who were involved in that. But this is
Speaker 2: this is a nice If you remember the commemorative coin
Speaker 2: that we had that was larger, it's like a medallion,
Speaker 2: and which is kind of interesting because I think somebody
Speaker 2: in Australia. We had a couple of people in Australia
Speaker 2: who ordered it, and they would not allow this to
Speaker 2: go out if we called it a coin, and so
Speaker 2: we had called a medallion, which it was. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's not technically a coin. It was a medallion and said, okay,
Speaker 2: you can do that. So we did that. But it's
Speaker 2: the same design that was on that coin, the commemorative coin.
Speaker 2: If you got one of those, or even if you
Speaker 2: didn't get one of those, now you can get this
Speaker 2: because it was sold out, and so it's the same
Speaker 2: design on both sides. And it's a nice piece. And
Speaker 2: as we point out, it is compatible with any physical
Speaker 2: book like all these tech things that come and go.
Speaker 2: And I've lived long enough that it's become a real
Speaker 2: frustration as the technology has changed. I mean, I've got
Speaker 2: so much music on different formats that i can't get
Speaker 2: to right now. And the same thing is true of data.
Speaker 2: And sometimes it's not that the old disk drive is bad,
Speaker 2: it's just that I've lost the cables and I can't
Speaker 2: find the cables that connect it to anything. It's frustrating
Speaker 2: to see that stuff happen. So I like physical books
Speaker 2: and I like physical bookmarks. And the book that we
Speaker 2: have that goes with it is actually it's lined, which
Speaker 2: you can see if I hold it up here. It's
Speaker 2: lined on the inside and maybe you can see that.
Speaker 2: It doesn't look like it shows up. But you can
Speaker 2: keep a diary about things that are happening in your
Speaker 2: life and things that are happening in your walk with God.
Speaker 2: And that's always a really good thing to do, even
Speaker 2: if it's just in your life. Like I said the
Speaker 2: other day, we kept a diary, and I had a
Speaker 2: little diary with us that we started writing down things
Speaker 2: that we did on our honeymoon in the UK. We
Speaker 2: were there and U came London for about six to
Speaker 2: eight weeks. I forget the exact amount now to go
Speaker 2: back and look at the diary. We're there for a
Speaker 2: very long time and we wrote down things we dine
Speaker 2: on a daily basis, and we always have a lot
Speaker 2: of fun going back and looking at that. Let's talk
Speaker 2: more about the Tenth Amendment versus Trump. Trump says that
Speaker 2: he's pardoning former Colorado County Clerk Tina Peters, and look,
Speaker 2: I think that that's a just cause. But he doesn't
Speaker 2: have the authority to do it. And it truly is
Speaker 2: amazing to see some of these outlets and the outrage
Speaker 2: that they have. Look at this, they just ignore this.
Speaker 2: They're laughing at him. Well, of course they're laughing at
Speaker 2: him because he doesn't have any power in the Tenth
Speaker 2: Amendment to do this. And you should be laughed at
Speaker 2: as a news organization if you put that out there.
Speaker 2: So the presidential partner of the republican former officeholder appears
Speaker 2: to be merely symbolic. Zero Hedge got it right. The
Speaker 2: Pardons Clause of the US Constitution says the president has
Speaker 2: the power to quote grant reprieves and pardons for offenses
Speaker 2: against the United States unquote. The clause also allows presidents
Speaker 2: to grant preemptive pardons, which by the way he didn't
Speaker 2: do for the j sixers, did he. And I've mentioned
Speaker 2: this over and over again, the very Insurrection Act that
Speaker 2: the left one to talk about as they used lawfair
Speaker 2: against was it fifteen hundred people or so. They were
Speaker 2: there to lawfully express their their grievances and a protest
Speaker 2: that is protected by the First Amendment. Violence is not protected.
Speaker 2: If anybody got violent or they destroyed property, that's another issue.
Speaker 2: But they were ramping this thing up to the Insurrection
Speaker 2: Act and giving people years in prison for stuff, and
Speaker 2: it was absolutely outrageous. It was over the top, even
Speaker 2: for the people who got violent. And I to go
Speaker 2: back and remember that the Insurrection Act was passed after
Speaker 2: the Civil War, and it was an effort by Republicans
Speaker 2: to get even with the Confederates who had fought against
Speaker 2: Northern aggression. And Andrew Johnson, who came after Lincoln, whose
Speaker 2: vice president took charge after Lincoln was assassinated. Andrew Johnson
Speaker 2: issued a blanket pardon to all Confederate soldiers. So when
Speaker 2: Congress set up the Insurrection Act, his first response was
Speaker 2: to say, no, we're not going to keep the Civil
Speaker 2: War going. I'm pardoning everybody, and I talked about that
Speaker 2: at the time. I said, you know, these Democrats, just
Speaker 2: like the Republicans, want a civil war. They want to
Speaker 2: keep this thing going. I'm going to keep picking at
Speaker 2: the scab of the wounds. And we also saw it
Speaker 2: with Gerald Ford, and Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon before
Speaker 2: he was ever charged with anything, and so you can
Speaker 2: do that preemptively. And then we saw we talked about
Speaker 2: all that stuff for several years. When Biden is on
Speaker 2: his way out, was he do he gives a preemptive
Speaker 2: pardon to a lot of people, especially his son. And
Speaker 2: so it is a total disregard for the law and
Speaker 2: for the constitution for Trump to and his people who
Speaker 2: support him to think that he has the power to
Speaker 2: pardon somebody who has been convicted in a state court
Speaker 2: of state crimes. And I don't think she committed any crimes.
Speaker 2: I think the crime that was committed was committed by
Speaker 2: the state government of Colorado. But it's important that we
Speaker 2: not lose the tenth Amendment. It seems like everything that
Speaker 2: Trump is doing is predicated on an attack on the
Speaker 2: Tenth Amendment. Peters was convicted in Colorado state court in
Speaker 2: August of twenty twenty four on election related charges such
Speaker 2: as allowing unauthorized access to voting machines, and she was
Speaker 2: sentenced to nine years of prison. She previously said that
Speaker 2: her efforts as the mess mesa county clerk were aimed
Speaker 2: at upholding election integrity by creating a forensic backdrop of
Speaker 2: a county election server. Trump wrote that she is a
Speaker 2: patriot who simply wanted to make sure that our elections
Speaker 2: were fair and honest. She's imprisoned for the crime of
Speaker 2: demanding honest elections. Well, I agree with that, but he
Speaker 2: has to have the authority of the ability to pardon her,
Speaker 2: and it's absurd that people would demand that. Colorado Governor
Speaker 2: Jared Pollis said the presidential pardon was invalid in her case,
Speaker 2: that she was convicted by a jury of breaking Colorado
Speaker 2: state laws. One of the most basic principles of our
Speaker 2: constitution is that states have independent sovereignty and manage our
Speaker 2: own criminal justice systems without interference from the federal government.
Speaker 2: And just remember that with his unconstitutional executor order, we're
Speaker 2: just talking about saying that you can't prohibit you can't
Speaker 2: have any laws prohibiting AI. Well, of course they can,
Speaker 2: and he can't stop them, and they could enact penalties
Speaker 2: against his technocrat oligarch friends, right, But what he would
Speaker 2: do in response would be to cut off money to
Speaker 2: those states. And so that's the way this whole thing
Speaker 2: would work out. That's the way they always do this.
Speaker 2: But he can't stop states from enacting laws, and he can't,
Speaker 2: just as he can't whether you grew with the law
Speaker 2: or not, just like in this particular case. I don't
Speaker 2: agree with the conviction of Tina Peters, but Trump has
Speaker 2: no jurisdiction here and he shouldn't have. No president should
Speaker 2: The idea that the president could pardon somebody tried and
Speaker 2: convicted in state court has no precedent in American law,
Speaker 2: and it would be an outrageous departure from what our
Speaker 2: constitution requires, and it will not hold up, said the governor.
Speaker 2: In a statement. Rudy Giuliani said, Well, while Tina is
Speaker 2: currently in state prison, the pardon ensures that the federal
Speaker 2: government cannot pursue federal charges, and it gives renew'd focus
Speaker 2: and attention to her story, and that's the key. Giuliani
Speaker 2: has not been convicted of any federal offenses either, but
Speaker 2: Trump preemptively pardoned him last month. So now we've seen
Speaker 2: that Trump has issued promptive pardons just like Biden did.
Speaker 2: And they always could because we had this going back,
Speaker 2: especially even to the Insurrection Act, which they were freaking
Speaker 2: out about, the Democrats were, and yet Trump let these
Speaker 2: j sixers twist in the wind, and Giuliani knew it
Speaker 2: as well. So when you look at WND, their article
Speaker 2: is unfairly convicted. Trump hands Tina Peters a full pardon
Speaker 2: for her attempts to expose voter fraud. And what W
Speaker 2: and D simply does is all they do is quote
Speaker 2: Trump tweets and they rail against leftist Democrats, but they
Speaker 2: don't ever talk about the issues of the Tenth Amendment
Speaker 2: and of state powers. And then Gateway Punit is even
Speaker 2: worse than WND. This is their headline, breaking huge all uppercase,
Speaker 2: screaming right. Prison officials won't recognize President Trump's pardon. They
Speaker 2: laugh at their request and refuse to release Tina Peters.
Speaker 2: Your headline is laughable. I mean, this is crazy. It's
Speaker 2: partisan whining that's going on here. They then go on
Speaker 2: say this is not America. Well, actually no, it is.
Speaker 2: It is America where power is separated into different spheres
Speaker 2: by design. It is the Constitution, and the Constitution is
Speaker 2: despised by conservatives as well as liberals when they don't
Speaker 2: get their way when their party is not in power somewhere.
Speaker 2: I guess we could call this constitution derangement syndrome. Don't
Speaker 2: you think we have the constitution arrangement syndrome right now
Speaker 2: that MAGA is guilty with Tina Peters and in all
Speaker 2: the time with the left as well. You know, the
Speaker 2: whole thing about January sixth was constitution derangement syndrome, wasn't it,
Speaker 2: Because they had the right recognized that the government was
Speaker 2: prohibited from stopping them from addressing their a grievances in
Speaker 2: a peaceful way. Tina Peters is more of a political
Speaker 2: prisoner than she ever was a criminal. She did nothing wrong,
Speaker 2: says Gateway Punt, And look, I agree with that. I
Speaker 2: think the crime that was committed here was committed by
Speaker 2: the state government of Colorado. And they've done that over
Speaker 2: and over again. Look at what they've done to that baker,
Speaker 2: Masterpiece Bakery. He has appealed these and it always came.
Speaker 2: There were always charges that came from the state government
Speaker 2: to Colorado. Colorado's got a horrific state government. It was,
Speaker 2: and the conservatives that are there are really beleaguered and
Speaker 2: they're desperate for help, and I feel for them. I
Speaker 2: was on a Colorado radio station that was there. There's
Speaker 2: a local station, and they are hardcore conservatives, and you know,
Speaker 2: it makes you more conservative when you live in an
Speaker 2: enclave like that of the left that has absolutely no
Speaker 2: respect for individual rights. And they have come after the
Speaker 2: state of Colorado has come after that baker again over
Speaker 2: and over again because he wouldn't bake a homosexual wedding cake.
Speaker 2: And he said, I'll sell you anything that you want
Speaker 2: in here, but I'm not going to custom make that.
Speaker 2: You're not going to rub my face and my Christian
Speaker 2: beliefs into that cake, which is the purpose of them
Speaker 2: doing that. And then he was vindicated. He had to
Speaker 2: take it all the way to the Supreme Court. He
Speaker 2: was vindicated, and then Colorado state government did it to
Speaker 2: him again because there was a lawyer who was a
Speaker 2: trainee who came in said I want you to make
Speaker 2: a tranniversary cake for me, you know, as the anniversary
Speaker 2: of his training operation or whatever that he had, and
Speaker 2: refuse to do it. So they had taken them all
Speaker 2: the way to Supreme Court again and defeat him a
Speaker 2: second time. Colorado has a horrible government and what they're
Speaker 2: doing to Tina Peters is horrible as well. Trump has
Speaker 2: no authority there. You know, if it's a lawsuit, you
Speaker 2: can keep appealing that lawsuit through the federal courts. But
Speaker 2: he doesn't have any power here. And so they are
Speaker 2: outraged the way pundit and their response is to put
Speaker 2: a copy President Trump's pardon of Tina Peters into this article,
Speaker 2: which is absolutely irrelevant except for the attention that it
Speaker 2: can draw to her case. But nobody outside of Colorado
Speaker 2: can do anything about it. Meanwhile, Trump is vowing truckloads
Speaker 2: of evidence that the twenty twenty election was rigged, still
Speaker 2: fighting that. Even though he's president again now, he's not
Speaker 2: going to be focused on what has to be done now,
Speaker 2: what has ahead. He's still looking back to twenty I
Speaker 2: don't forget Tim Poole, who's now descended into this soap
Speaker 2: opera between Candice Owen and Erica Kirk and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. But he had before the election
Speaker 2: of last year, he had a program where he had
Speaker 2: Lukeradowski and Laura Lumer and tem Poole and there Luke said,
Speaker 2: you know, what about this this vaccine thing or something.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm so sick and tired of hearing about that.
Speaker 2: I don't want to hear about that. That was twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: And he goes into all this stuff I have the
Speaker 2: election was stolen. It's like, well, you know that was
Speaker 2: also four years ago. They can't get past it. And
Speaker 2: so I'm assuming that if there's going to be truckloads
Speaker 2: of evidence that the twenty twenty election was rigged and
Speaker 2: that's going to be coming out, I think that's the
Speaker 2: same truck that has all the Epstein files on it,
Speaker 2: all the JFK files on it. I think that truck
Speaker 2: has been re routed and lost somewhere, hasn't shown up.
Speaker 2: Their ship is not coming yet. I think's where you're
Speaker 2: going to find it. And of course, you know, it
Speaker 2: goes back to we've seen this type of thing before.
Speaker 2: I remember when Mike Lindell had this event and he said,
Speaker 2: I've got it, I've got the receipts. I'm going to
Speaker 2: show you all the evidence. He had this special event
Speaker 2: and so Steve Bennon covered it live and I played
Speaker 2: the clip I'll never forget Steve Bannon. After you know,
Speaker 2: about forty minutes or whatever. You know, Mike Lindell wasn't
Speaker 2: showing anything, wasn't showing any receipts, and Bennon says, we've
Speaker 2: seen all this before. He doesn't have anything, and we're
Speaker 2: going to end this now, you know, and and he
Speaker 2: cut away from it. Well, Mike Lindell is now going
Speaker 2: to run for governor in Minnesota. And look, he would
Speaker 2: absolutely be better than Tim Walls. Anybody would be better
Speaker 2: than Tim Walls. But he's going to lose. It's a
Speaker 2: Democrat state, and guess what, He's going to blame election
Speaker 2: corruption on it again. And I'm really sad to see it.
Speaker 2: I think Mike len is a nice guy, but I
Speaker 2: think he's just gone down this rabbit hole and he's
Speaker 2: destroying his life and his business that he built. And
Speaker 2: he really did come back from oblivion. He had been
Speaker 2: addicted to drugs and the thing that brought him back
Speaker 2: was becoming a Christian again, you know, just as we're
Speaker 2: talking about yesterday. And you know, you look at the
Speaker 2: programs like a Teen Challenge that matere Hala was talking about,
Speaker 2: or Jeff Weis's Free Indeed program. When they look at
Speaker 2: these programs, you know, they're having you know, eighty ninety
Speaker 2: percent people who get off of drugs versus if you
Speaker 2: look at the people who go to counseling into psychiatry.
Speaker 2: You know, as we're talking about that in the context
Speaker 2: of Rob Reiner's son, the people who try this counseling
Speaker 2: stuff and everything, they have a failure rate of like
Speaker 2: ninety six percent, whereas these other programs were documented the
Speaker 2: teen Challenge eighty seven percent success versus psychology a ninety
Speaker 2: six percent failure rate. And it's Christ that is there.
Speaker 2: It's not you're gonna be saved by Sigmund Freud or
Speaker 2: Carl Jung or any of these psychologists. They have no
Speaker 2: power to do anything, but there is power in Christ.
Speaker 2: And it is those programs. And it's not just you know,
Speaker 2: Team Challenge. As a point out, you know, Jeff wis
Speaker 2: there locally, as is you know, Free Indeed program, and
Speaker 2: there's some other ones that are out there. And we've
Speaker 2: talked about this in the past where they looked at
Speaker 2: some of these programs and where they refuse to use
Speaker 2: methodone and some other things like that. In addition to
Speaker 2: counseling and they just went with the power of Christ.
Speaker 2: And you see this over and over again. You want
Speaker 2: the program that has eighties percent success rate, although one
Speaker 2: that's got an eighty percent failure rate. That's the real issue.
Speaker 2: I remember seeing on YouTube a guy who was he's
Speaker 2: now like an Orthodox priest or something Eastern Orthodox priest
Speaker 2: and Christian. He grew up Jewish and one of the
Speaker 2: things he was talking about in terms of his background
Speaker 2: was and he could really see it in Rob Reiner's
Speaker 2: family and that is, he said, the the the obsession
Speaker 2: with psychology and Sigmund Freud. He said, Sigmund Freud was
Speaker 2: like this worship figure to them, you know, the people
Speaker 2: that he was growing up when he was Jewish, and
Speaker 2: you know, he he went through all of it, the
Speaker 2: Bob Mitzvah and all the rest of this stuff. And
Speaker 2: and he was Jewish for quite some time in terms
Speaker 2: of his perspective in his whole family, and he said,
Speaker 2: the way that they focus on and you could see it.
Speaker 2: And a lot of the movies I remember, especially Witty
Speaker 2: Allen in the early days before we knew about you know,
Speaker 2: what kind of a pedophile he was. I remember Annie
Speaker 2: Hall in that movie and his obsession and movie after
Speaker 2: movie with going into psychiatric counseling. You know, all his
Speaker 2: characters going in he was always talking about hey was
Speaker 2: doing it, and it really is kind of an obsession
Speaker 2: and it is something that really doesn't help. So, speaking
Speaker 2: of other criminals that are out there, Leticia James sued
Speaker 2: for threatening school boards that permit free speech on LGBT issues.
Speaker 2: And this is what I'm saying about Letitia James. You know,
Speaker 2: Trump is out there trying to get vengeance against her
Speaker 2: when she is a horrible attorney general, violating the law,
Speaker 2: violating the constitution left and right. It wasn't just against Trump.
Speaker 2: It wasn't just a lawfair against him. And there are
Speaker 2: things like this that the government could come after her for.
Speaker 2: But this is going to be a lawsuit done by
Speaker 2: residents in New York because she's a tyrant. She's awful.
Speaker 2: She ought to be in jail. She got to be
Speaker 2: out of office at the very least. A coalition of
Speaker 2: school board members and parents are suing New York Attorney
Speaker 2: General Letitia James and other state officials over the threats
Speaker 2: to remove school board members who express or who allow
Speaker 2: parents to express viewpoints at odds with those of the
Speaker 2: lgbt lobby, and this is the appropriate response to her.
Speaker 2: On May eighth, James and the State Education Commissioner, Betty
Speaker 2: Rosa sent a guidance letter to school boards across New
Speaker 2: York warning them of dire consequences if they allowed unfettered
Speaker 2: speech about transgender issues at their meetings. The two advised
Speaker 2: these school boards that during their meetings they have a
Speaker 2: duty to prohibit all comments on a particular topic that
Speaker 2: would have discriminatory, harassing or bullying effects. So we know
Speaker 2: what they're saying here. You know, you have a duty
Speaker 2: to censor people, and you have to determine what speech
Speaker 2: is allowed. How insane this is. Boards of education that
Speaker 2: permit harassing and stigmatizing comments about LGBTQ plus students in
Speaker 2: public meetings said the letter may expose districts to liability
Speaker 2: under state law, especially if their acts or omissions lead
Speaker 2: to the bullying or harassment of LGBTQ students. So the
Speaker 2: lawsuit filed Tuesday in the U. S. District Court for
Speaker 2: the Northern District of New York summarizes the letter and says,
Speaker 2: in other words, the Attorney General and the Commissioner of
Speaker 2: Education requires school board members across New York to self
Speaker 2: censor and to shut down parental speech that advocates for
Speaker 2: their core values and for children's privacy, safety, and opportunity.
Speaker 2: If school board members and parents disagree with defendant's viewpoint,
Speaker 2: they cannot speak. If they do speak, school board members
Speaker 2: risk being removed from their elected offices, and school board
Speaker 2: members and their parents alike risk being publicly and falsely
Speaker 2: branded a bully and a harasser of children. See, this
Speaker 2: is the type of thing the Trump administration probably should
Speaker 2: get involved in. I don't know, you know where the
Speaker 2: lions are drawn with that, but it'll probably go through
Speaker 2: the court system, maybe all the way up to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. But students as well are muzzled under these conditions.
Speaker 2: The only thing is that the Trump administration would never
Speaker 2: do this, because the Trump administration is applying these same
Speaker 2: censorship standards when it comes to criticism of a foreign
Speaker 2: government Israel, and you should be allowed to criticize the
Speaker 2: LGBT stuff as well as a foreign government. And what
Speaker 2: he's doing is trying to intimidate students as well as
Speaker 2: entire school systems and administrations. So just like the left,
Speaker 2: he is guilty of censorship and intimidation. Well, we're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break here, folks, and we will
Speaker 2: be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6: We're going to take a photo on a phone. There
Speaker 6: is machine learning in the background.
Speaker 7: Highest quality video capture ever in a smartphone.
Speaker 6: In the metaverse, we're going to need AI that is
Speaker 6: build around helping people navigate virtual worlds as well as
Speaker 6: our physical world with augmented reality. Augmented reality is a
Speaker 6: profound technology that includes like your position in three D space,
Speaker 6: your body language, facial gestures, and we invented new intimate
Speaker 6: ways to connect and communicate directly from your risk everything
Speaker 6: from virtual reality to designing our own data centers.
Speaker 8: Describing what's coming even it's just so different in you.
Speaker 8: I've been in this infrastructure business for three decades.
Speaker 9: No one has ever seen an industry yeah, and.
Speaker 6: Now I expect that these trends will only increase in
Speaker 6: the future.
Speaker 9: In the last few months, we launched voice and vision
Speaker 9: capabilities so that chat GPT can now see here and speak.
Speaker 9: Court's up to one hundred and twenty eight thousand tokens
Speaker 9: of contexts that's three hundred pages of a standard book.
Speaker 6: That's all AI generated. Actually, let's add some alto Cumulus bucks.
Speaker 2: All right, break free of the technocratic Knight mayor this
Speaker 2: Christmas and go back to basics where the David Knight
Speaker 2: Show bookmark and notebook. This high quality and boss metal
Speaker 2: bookmark with a full color design on the back is
Speaker 2: guaranteed to be cross compatible with all physical books, and
Speaker 2: the beautiful foe leather notebook is one hundred percent hacking proof.
Speaker 2: An ideal gift for fans of the David Knight Show
Speaker 2: or anyone looking to start a journaling or prayer journal habit.
Speaker 2: No bells and no whistles, just pen and paper. Available
Speaker 2: at Davidnight dot News. Merry Christmas, all right, and we're
Speaker 2: back and we've got some comments here. This is from
Speaker 2: Epstein Island. He says, I still can't believe that Trump
Speaker 2: is the president after watching him troll ex wives, bankrupt
Speaker 2: casinos and basically just be a degenerate playboy. Is that
Speaker 2: the best that America can do? He is the best
Speaker 2: prostitute that money can buy. Because of all those things,
Speaker 2: that's why he is president. And he is the president
Speaker 2: that twenty first century America deserves. Frankly, yes we have.
Speaker 5: Nuburu twenty twenty nine says the selections are real. The
Speaker 5: choices the aristocracy offers the sheep are where the rigging
Speaker 5: really lies to the money masters. It doesn't matter which
Speaker 5: of the two are chosen.
Speaker 2: That's right, And you had rat Fink, Larry Fink of
Speaker 2: Black Rock said that. He says, it doesn't make any
Speaker 2: difference to what we're going to do. Which one of
Speaker 2: the two wins. He's going to get what he wants,
Speaker 2: whether it was Lola Harris or whether it is the
Speaker 2: Dawn that got in there, either way going to be
Speaker 2: able to get what they want because they own these people. Well,
Speaker 2: as I was saying before, you know, freedom of speech
Speaker 2: is so important and now so despised, not just the
Speaker 2: people at the top, but by the grassroots as well.
Speaker 2: Here's an example in the UK from the Daily Skeptic.
Speaker 2: The Green Party is planning to punish men who correct women.
Speaker 2: Don't you dare correct or contradict what a woman has
Speaker 2: to say? Is that amazing? You know who rules? When
Speaker 2: you know who, you're not allowed to criticize, right, So
Speaker 2: they go on and on and on about the patriarchy
Speaker 2: when in reality what they want to establish is a matriarchy.
Speaker 2: They don't want to have any criticism of either side.
Speaker 2: Men who correct women could face disciplinary action under plans
Speaker 2: being considered by the Green Parties. As a Telegraph, they said,
Speaker 2: party bosses are considering a proposal to broaden the Green's
Speaker 2: definition of misogyny to the point that quote any disagreement
Speaker 2: unquote between the sexes could lead to the man facing
Speaker 2: a sanction. Yes, the men must be silent and respectful
Speaker 2: at all times. The revelation is included in an internal
Speaker 2: fifty three page report on legal and reputational risk to
Speaker 2: the party that has been leaked to the UK Telegraph.
Speaker 2: The dossier also exposes a wider row over the party's
Speaker 2: policies on transgender and LGBT rights. The report, produced by
Speaker 2: the Green's own lawyers, warns that internal guidance on identifying
Speaker 2: transphobia and queer phobia as they call it, risk discriminating
Speaker 2: against members who question disputed gender theory. The Green Party
Speaker 2: Council also was quote very close unquote to adding a
Speaker 2: document called Guidance on identifying misogyny as sexism to his
Speaker 2: ethics framework. According to the report, this document lists being
Speaker 2: corrected as one example of how women experience misogynistic behavior,
Speaker 2: an example that is so broad that it is liable
Speaker 2: to justify any disagreement between a man and a woman
Speaker 2: on a sanctionable as a sanctionable disciplinary offense. To make
Speaker 2: it illegal to criticize women. Always, whatever you see something
Speaker 2: crazy like that, it always makes me think back to
Speaker 2: John Knox's treatise that he wrote about Queen Elizabeth and
Speaker 2: Queen Mary the monstrous regiment of women. But Hong Kong's
Speaker 2: biggest pro democracy party has now voted to disband. This
Speaker 2: is something that Jeryl Clinty has mentioned over and over again,
Speaker 2: how there were massive turnouts of people pushing back against
Speaker 2: the communist tyranny in Hong Kong until they enacted the
Speaker 2: COVID rules basically shut it all down. Now shut it
Speaker 2: down to the point where the Democracy Party is just
Speaker 2: going to disband because of the effect of the COVID plandemic.
Speaker 2: As the times have shifted, we now, with deep regret,
Speaker 2: must bring this chapter to a close, they said, so,
Speaker 2: ninety seven percent of the members voted in support of liquidation.
Speaker 2: They've thrown in the towel. They can no longer move forward.
Speaker 2: In terms of opposing the Communist Party because it is
Speaker 2: locking them up because it does not want to have
Speaker 2: any freedom or democracy, and its demise reflects the dwindling
Speaker 2: freedoms promised to the former British colony when it returned
Speaker 2: to China's rule in nineteen ninety seven. China imposed a
Speaker 2: National security law in June of twenty twenty. This is
Speaker 2: when happened following the massive anti government protests the year before,
Speaker 2: saying it was necessary for the city's stability. Under that law,
Speaker 2: many leading activists dating the Democrat parties. Democratic Parties former
Speaker 2: chairs Albert Hoe and Wu Chi Wai and other former
Speaker 2: lawmakers were arrested in jailed. And so the question is
Speaker 2: how much longer is there going to be before we
Speaker 2: see this happening with Trump? Are I seeing it happening
Speaker 2: a lot in the EU and the UK people who
Speaker 2: oppose politically what the government is doing. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: they'll come after you for the supposed hate speech of
Speaker 2: saying what you believe about sex and gender and things
Speaker 2: like that, but they also come after you if you
Speaker 2: pose the government's immigration policy that's hateful, so we'll lock
Speaker 2: you up. And we're watching social media all the time
Speaker 2: they evolved instead of the freedom that Hong Kong was
Speaker 2: famous for. And I remember when Milton Friedman did his
Speaker 2: series Free to Choose, he kept going back to Hong
Speaker 2: Kong as an example of what a free city looks
Speaker 2: like and how it prospers because under the British, the
Speaker 2: British didn't really care about extra sizing any power or
Speaker 2: rule in Hong Kong. So it is basically a free
Speaker 2: society and that has all gone the way of our constitution.
Speaker 2: Now dinosaur, the way of the dinosaur. The pro democracy
Speaker 2: Apple Daily Newspapers was one of the most vocal independent outlets.
Speaker 2: It has also shut down over the past five years.
Speaker 2: It was so important what the governments worldwide did in
Speaker 2: terms of establishing new powers, the ability to lock us
Speaker 2: down for whatever phony mcguffin they had at the time.
Speaker 2: And again, these aregons who are resting dissent, shutting down
Speaker 2: the free press, all the stuff that Trump wants to do.
Speaker 2: I mean, he wants you should have a license for
Speaker 2: that should be against the law to criticize me, Well,
Speaker 2: it is against the law in communist China. He wants
Speaker 2: us to be communist China. Trump is the Manchurian candidate
Speaker 2: of the globalist technocracy. He is there guy pretending to
Speaker 2: be something that he's not. Well, the Trump administration has
Speaker 2: pulled ninety five hundred truck drivers off the road for
Speaker 2: failing English tests. I support this, This is a good thing.
Speaker 2: The problem is that, you know, they haven't focused on
Speaker 2: things like this, things like the Somali corruption in Minneapolis.
Speaker 2: The problem with the Trump administration is that they have
Speaker 2: focused on things that I think they know are designed
Speaker 2: to create conflict and headlines, as the wrestling WWE approach
Speaker 2: to governance. The government has edded and abated this problem
Speaker 2: and now they're demanding digital ideas a solution many places.
Speaker 2: So they said, we've knocked ninety five hundred truck drivers
Speaker 2: out of service for failing to speak our national language English,
Speaker 2: wrote Sean Duffy. This administration will always put you in
Speaker 2: your family's safety first, unless it has to do with
Speaker 2: self driving trucks. They'll grease the skids for that. They
Speaker 2: don't want to protect the jobs of truckers and they
Speaker 2: don't want to protect our lives either. So this this
Speaker 2: article from an American thinker. Somebody just referenced Caesar what
Speaker 2: kind of Caesar wild Trump be yeah, Will he be
Speaker 2: a benevolent dictator or will he be a bad guy?
Speaker 2: Is Trump going to be Caesar or Augustus? Is he
Speaker 2: going to be a president who rearranges the deck chairs
Speaker 2: the Titanic and simply slows down her eventual collision on
Speaker 2: the iceberg? Or is he going to steer her through
Speaker 2: the treacherous waters bring her out safely on the other side.
Speaker 2: This is what it's come to, where you have people
Speaker 2: who are presumably conservative and pinning their hopes and trying
Speaker 2: to tell people that Trump is going to be a
Speaker 2: good dictator. We don't want that. So when Trump won
Speaker 2: reelection last November, I was certain that after enduring eight
Speaker 2: years of what was easily the most vitriolic abuse in
Speaker 2: the American politician ever endured, he was going to return
Speaker 2: to Washington and metaphorical heads were going to roll, And
Speaker 2: indeed he ran on the idea of destroying the deep state.
Speaker 2: Now a year after the election, I'm not so sure.
Speaker 2: Though I applaud most of his moves on immigration, there
Speaker 2: are two elements that cause concerns. As his writer, One
Speaker 2: is his support for the H one B VISA program.
Speaker 2: If there are jobs that can't be filled by Americans,
Speaker 2: then bringing in foreign workers who have the necessary skills
Speaker 2: makes sense for keeping American industry productive. But that's not
Speaker 2: what's happening. Foreign workers, particularly Indians, are being brought in
Speaker 2: to supplant American workers. Another area where Trump has not
Speaker 2: met expectations is taking on the leftist cabal. In other words,
Speaker 2: they want more partisan conflict. What is missing from this
Speaker 2: person's understanding is the lockdown the MR and A. What
Speaker 2: he's doing now with artificial intelligence, how he's shutting down
Speaker 2: the Tenth Amendment, the First Amendment and all the other
Speaker 2: ones in between, and the Bill of Rights. This is
Speaker 2: just amazing to me that they're calling for a caesar.
Speaker 2: And this is something that always bothered me going back
Speaker 2: to when the drug war began. Still it's early, not
Speaker 2: actually when it began, but in its early phases with
Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan, that's when he really put the pedal to
Speaker 2: the medal. You had Richard Nixon in act the UN's
Speaker 2: drug war with the four Schedules and things like that,
Speaker 2: but they really went after the end users and started
Speaker 2: with the mandatory minimums and things like that that Biden
Speaker 2: supported under the Reagan administration, and under the Attorney General
Speaker 2: Ed Mese, I mean, when that all happened, and to
Speaker 2: emphas size that they're going to get real authoritarian with everybody,
Speaker 2: they put in Bill Bennett as the drug tzar. Remember that,
Speaker 2: And don't they understand that we don't like czars, you know,
Speaker 2: comes after Caesar. You know, we had in Germany they
Speaker 2: would call the leader Kaiser, which was again like a
Speaker 2: German form of Caesar, and Russia was the Czar, And
Speaker 2: I guess I looked at it. I thought, well, I
Speaker 2: guess they look at this and they say, well, Zaris,
Speaker 2: Russia was anti communists, so we can call ourselves tsars
Speaker 2: and that it's okay, but you're really calling yourself a king,
Speaker 2: you're really calling yourself a Caesar. And these guys are
Speaker 2: fine with that. They just want him to come after
Speaker 2: their enemies and they imagine he's going to be on
Speaker 2: their side. And so then they go on and this
Speaker 2: particular article they go on to of course attack the
Speaker 2: whole idea of trial by jury, because the right, just
Speaker 2: like the left, is really descending into authoritarian Tierney. We
Speaker 2: are seeing both the left and the right now at
Speaker 2: even the grassroots level and certainly within the media they are.
Speaker 2: You've got alternative media people who have become such Trump
Speaker 2: cheerleaders that they're now cheering foreign wars, dirty little wars,
Speaker 2: like Smedley Butler called out. You've now got Alex Jones
Speaker 2: defending that and bringing on Patrick Byrne all the time
Speaker 2: to defend that. And it's really outrageous to see this
Speaker 2: and sad to see this, but that's what it's become,
Speaker 2: and it is pervasive. We're rotting from the top down.
Speaker 2: You have this hubris, this arrogance, and this push for
Speaker 2: dictatorship from Trump, and it's filtering down through the media
Speaker 2: that supports them and down to the grassroots that supports them,
Speaker 2: which is what this is really about. As we all
Speaker 2: learned in the O. J. Simpson trials, juries not always
Speaker 2: be trusted. But again, you can trust the government always.
Speaker 2: How about the Department of Justice. I think it can
Speaker 2: never be trusted, especially with somebody like Bondi in charge.
Speaker 2: And so they're pushing back against this and saying, well,
Speaker 2: we don't like it because some juries have refused to
Speaker 2: indict Letitia James for a non crime. They refuse to
Speaker 2: do the same thing that was done to Trump. And
Speaker 2: yet as I said before, there are a lot of
Speaker 2: ways that she has violated her office, and you've got
Speaker 2: people who are suing her right now with civil lawsuits.
Speaker 2: That's the appropriate approach to take to her. But to
Speaker 2: just go back and do exactly the same thing to
Speaker 2: her that she did to Trump, it's not justified because
Speaker 2: Trump's doing it. It wasn't justified because the Democrat was
Speaker 2: doing it. Had Democrats saying it's okay because we don't
Speaker 2: like Trump. Now you've got Republicans saying it's okay the
Speaker 2: law because we don't like Letitia James. Well, I don't
Speaker 2: like her either, but I don't like this kind of tyranny,
Speaker 2: this kind of Caesar stuff that I see here Search
Speaker 2: and Caesar as it's really going on with a lot
Speaker 2: of these things. And so again, this person is very
Speaker 2: upset about the fact that they're not able to get
Speaker 2: revenge because the cases that are so absurd and so
Speaker 2: thin against Letitia James and even grand juries won't indict her.
Speaker 2: But she does have crimes that she should be they
Speaker 2: should come after her with that abuse of power. Decades
Speaker 2: from now, Trump is going to be remembered. The question
Speaker 2: is will he be remembered as a celebrity president. Or
Speaker 2: is he going to be remembered as a heroic mythic
Speaker 2: figure who fought back against the leftist tide and put
Speaker 2: America back on firm limited government constitutional form. No, that
Speaker 2: won't happen. I mean, just take a look at what
Speaker 2: he is talking. He's not talking about limiting government. He's
Speaker 2: talking about increasing government. Even when you look at what's
Speaker 2: going on with this terari stuff, what is this metric?
Speaker 2: He can't point to more manufacturing, you can't point to
Speaker 2: more jobs, because that ain't happening. He's getting a lot
Speaker 2: of money for the federal government. He's not limiting government.
Speaker 2: He's expanding government. It's just the opposite of all this.
Speaker 2: He'll be remembered as the father of mRNA and of
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence in terms of greasing the skids for these
Speaker 2: predatory technologies. He'll be remembered as an accomplice, as a
Speaker 2: globalist trainer. That's the way I'll remember him. Well. Moving
Speaker 2: on to this story, which is completely enough for something
Speaker 2: completely different. A door sure in Indiana arrested for allegedly
Speaker 2: pepper spraying the delivery the food. Did you see this, Travis?
Speaker 2: This is pretty amazing here you like your food hot,
Speaker 2: but I guess you would prefer not to eat it
Speaker 2: with pepper spray on it. That's a little bit perhaps
Speaker 2: beyond even the ghost peppers or the Sichuan stuff that's there.
Speaker 5: I feel like them might do some sort of permanent
Speaker 5: damage to your stomach.
Speaker 2: Lining Well, it made these people pretty sick. And they've
Speaker 2: got her to writes because there was a you know,
Speaker 2: door dash and door cams and all the rest of
Speaker 2: this stuff. And actually she was caught on camera spraying
Speaker 2: the food. She claims she was trying to kill a spider.
Speaker 2: And I guess we're going to tie this into the
Speaker 2: political stuff. We've seen that over and over again, haven't we.
Speaker 2: You know, somebody who's going they got a fly on
Speaker 2: the wall, so let's pull out the shotgun and try
Speaker 2: to take out that fly. And we see that type
Speaker 2: of approach and politics over and over again.
Speaker 5: I was gonna say, I haven't her had to use
Speaker 5: pepper spray to kill us before?
Speaker 2: Well, that's her defense. I don't think.
Speaker 5: I also don't think pepper spray would kill a spider. Yeah,
Speaker 5: they probably don't even have the necessary receptors to perceive.
Speaker 2: I can't imagine why she would do it. I don't know.
Speaker 2: If maybe she had some previous experience with these people
Speaker 2: I mentioned that would that'd be the first thing if
Speaker 2: I was doing the investigation, I'd look to see has
Speaker 2: she ever delivered to this people before. Maybe she's angry
Speaker 2: because they stiffed her on a tip or something, so
Speaker 2: I'll get even with them. You know, I don't get it.
Speaker 2: From what I saw from the video.
Speaker 5: She sort of looks just like a dysgenic goblin, So
Speaker 5: she could just be out here doing random acts of
Speaker 5: unkindness despite the world.
Speaker 2: Yeah, who knows. All right, We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 10: God be sis, I have you mustmll remeber cross you.
Speaker 10: My Christmas Spars are the rentile of the worlds, the.
Speaker 4: Skin Elvis, the Beatles, and the sweet sounds of Motown.
Speaker 4: Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 11: I Wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
Speaker 11: get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot com
Speaker 11: for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 6: There's right in the second flour there say.
Speaker 12: Would you wish George.
Speaker 13: Well, not just one wish A little hat flog first
Speaker 13: I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase the
Speaker 13: Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics
Speaker 13: like are you gonna Throw it Up?
Speaker 6: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 5: That's pretty good.
Speaker 13: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 3: Can't you come from?
Speaker 11: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 11: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and is
Speaker 11: all New I'll be home for Christmas?
Speaker 5: What do you want?
Speaker 3: You want the moon?
Speaker 13: Just say the word and I'll throw a lasshole around
Speaker 13: a plug down.
Speaker 12: I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 12: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 2: Well, let's take a look at the comments here before
Speaker 2: we move on to the next topic.
Speaker 5: Character Roger that New Republic Rising eighty three says David
Speaker 5: has an excellent view on the Second Amendment. Well regulated
Speaker 5: means essentially well practiced or as competent as the military.
Speaker 5: This takes pressure and costs off the federal government.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah, decentralizes the power as well. Absolutely, that's
Speaker 2: the whole purpose of it. That's the way it was designed.
Speaker 2: And they have demonized the term militia to say, oh,
Speaker 2: you're somebody wants to violently overthrow the government. No, it's
Speaker 2: exactly the opposite. You know. The Posse commatatis was the
Speaker 2: power of the community, and that's why the Posse Coommatatis
Speaker 2: Act said, we don't want federal troops in the communities.
Speaker 2: We've already got ways to deal with this with a
Speaker 2: sheriff that's elected and with the power of the community,
Speaker 2: the posse that he can put together on various issues. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 5: Patty Wax says we should tear up the federal road
Speaker 5: system because there is no constitutional authority to have built them.
Speaker 5: That will solve the truck driver license issue.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know, it's I don't know. The truck
Speaker 2: driver license issues really kind of at the state level
Speaker 2: right now. You've got states that are issuing driver's licenses
Speaker 2: to people who don't know how to read English and
Speaker 2: don't know or care what the signs say. It's a real,
Speaker 2: real issue. So I don't know. I think the solution
Speaker 2: is the they need to do something about the immigration,
Speaker 2: the uncontrolled immigration, that's the root cause of all this stuff.
Speaker 2: But it needs to be stopped at the source, and
Speaker 2: the way the Trump administration is doing this is really
Speaker 2: in the long term going to backfire against us. The
Speaker 2: way he is treating everybody that is here in terms of,
Speaker 2: you know, they are illegal. We've had we've talked about
Speaker 2: this when the Democrats have their debates, they say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, illegal immigrants, we shouldn't be doing this stuff.
Speaker 2: You treat them like they are breaking the law. Right,
Speaker 2: just admitted it. And so they have broken the law,
Speaker 2: but they're not terrorists and they shouldn't be treated like
Speaker 2: their mass murderers or something. And that's going to blow back,
Speaker 2: and it's going to create sympathy for people violating the
Speaker 2: law rather than getting them deported. And I think that's
Speaker 2: the real that's another real danger of Trump's policies. Giving
Speaker 2: that kind of power to the federal government that'll be
Speaker 2: used by the Feds for different issues against US, but
Speaker 2: it's also even going to people who want to stop
Speaker 2: illegal immigration should be opposing the way that Trump is
Speaker 2: handling this with a lot of people.
Speaker 5: I think Pizzerovonte seventeen seventy six says Trump's Israeli born
Speaker 5: picked for US anti Semitisms are plans to work with
Speaker 5: social media to suppress quote unquote hatred. That's from Chris
Speaker 5: moin Ahand.
Speaker 2: Yeah, as a matter of fact, here's the clip. I've
Speaker 2: got it here in the deck.
Speaker 14: President is sending a very strong message. Think about it. Ironically,
Speaker 14: I get off a plane, I am the president's representative,
Speaker 14: and I am walking off with the yamalka and I
Speaker 14: have kosher food and embassies will have kosher food. It
Speaker 14: is a game changer. The appointment is a game changer.
Speaker 14: And it's not about history. It's about education and how
Speaker 14: do we educate Indonesia has three hundred and fifty million
Speaker 14: Muslims living in the country. How do we change their textbooks?
Speaker 14: How do we hold the people in Gaza accountable that
Speaker 14: if America is paying for un textbooks and supposedly the
Speaker 14: changes are made, why are those textbooks not being used
Speaker 14: and why are they using.
Speaker 3: Their old textbooks.
Speaker 14: We have to teach people it's not okay to educate
Speaker 14: your kids to be a martyr okay, And we have
Speaker 14: to hold those countries accountable. How do we battle anti
Speaker 14: semitism on the internet. How are we doing better on algorithms?
Speaker 14: What companies can we work with? We are going to
Speaker 14: have a whole division of the office, a special anti
Speaker 14: Semitism that is going to work on technology and working
Speaker 14: with the greatest leaders in technology, many of whom are
Speaker 14: Jewish and have offered their assistance. The office is going
Speaker 14: to be revamped entirely to be one of the highest
Speaker 14: profile offices in the State Department, because that's what the
Speaker 14: Secretary wants, and that's what the President wants.
Speaker 2: That's what We're going.
Speaker 14: To have a very very strong mandate on education, on
Speaker 14: protecting people and how are we able to make a
Speaker 14: huge difference in combating what goes.
Speaker 2: On that disgusts me. You know, we have a very
Speaker 2: strong mandate, very first Amendment to the Constitution against the
Speaker 2: censorship and the manipulation that you're talking about, the very
Speaker 2: propaganda this is this is the thing that's going to
Speaker 2: blow back against them as well. People don't want this.
Speaker 2: Governments everywhere want it. Everywhere. You have governments looking at
Speaker 2: how they can censor us for one cause or the other.
Speaker 2: You got the LGBT lobby using government on the left
Speaker 2: to censor people and lock them up. And then you've
Speaker 2: got the Israelis who have bought the Republican Party now
Speaker 2: and they want to make sure that they're going to
Speaker 2: censor any criticism of a foreign government and defiance of
Speaker 2: our First Amendment and our free speech. This is what
Speaker 2: it looks like in the UK. A teacher fired for
Speaker 2: calling England a Christian country and has now won an appeal.
Speaker 2: You know, it's interesting because this time of year, even
Speaker 2: Richard Dawkins talks about how he loves the cultural aspects
Speaker 2: of Christianity. I like the Christmas carols, I like the
Speaker 2: cathedrals and the architecture that they've built and all the
Speaker 2: rest of the kind of stuff. But a teacher in
Speaker 2: England was banned from working with children for telling a
Speaker 2: Muslim student that quote, Britain is still a Christian state.
Speaker 2: The teacher has now won an appeal and received a
Speaker 2: new teaching job. The teacher reportedly pointed to the fact
Speaker 2: that the King was the head of the Church of
Speaker 2: England even though he doesn't believe in the Church of England,
Speaker 2: and even though King Charles loves Islam, whether he does
Speaker 2: the Church of England or christ but also that Islam
Speaker 2: was a minority religion in the UK. The teacher, who
Speaker 2: wished not to be identified, also reportedly reprimanded Muslim students
Speaker 2: for using the sinks of a school bathroom to wash
Speaker 2: their feet as an Islamic ritual before their Islamic prayers.
Speaker 2: Police were called to investigate this. And the thing that's
Speaker 2: interesting about this is that the school was not faith based,
Speaker 2: and they had already said that the concept of these
Speaker 2: Islamic prayers on playgrounds had already been banned, and so
Speaker 2: that was part of the banning, you know, washing their
Speaker 2: feet in the sink or whatever. But I remember when
Speaker 2: we went to the British Museum when you guys were young,
Speaker 2: two thousand and one. I went into the restroom there
Speaker 2: and there was a sign that says, please do not
Speaker 2: perform your morning ablutions here in the sink. And I thought,
Speaker 2: what in the world is that a word that I
Speaker 2: was not familiar with. I looked it up and is
Speaker 2: like washings, right, And so they don't want you washing
Speaker 2: your feet or you know, taking a bath in the
Speaker 2: sink in the British Museum. That's what this guy was
Speaker 2: kicked out for calling people out about that and again,
Speaker 2: and it was part of the Muslim prayers on the
Speaker 2: playground that were not allowed. After winning his appeal on
Speaker 2: the band, the teacher is now teaching at a different school.
Speaker 2: He isssuing the local authority with support from the Free
Speaker 2: Speech Union. Because free speech and the free exercise of
Speaker 2: religion are all tied together. We see this in Canada
Speaker 2: criminalizing Bible versus Next, Canadian lawmakers are targeting religious expression
Speaker 2: with a proposed hate speech amendment, and this is a
Speaker 2: way the censorship from the government of Israel is being
Speaker 2: put out. Always hate speech. You can't see anything that
Speaker 2: we disagree with. Quebec's ultra secular Separatist party has voted
Speaker 2: to strip away a long standing religious exemption from the
Speaker 2: country's hate speech laws. You can either have hate speech
Speaker 2: laws or hate crimes, or you can have free speech
Speaker 2: and the free exercise of religion. You can't have both.
Speaker 2: And again you can't really separate free speech from the
Speaker 2: free exercise of religion either. And increasingly we see, ironically,
Speaker 2: and it's sad to see it, but increasingly politics has
Speaker 2: become people's religion. It's all tied together. Canada's criminal code
Speaker 2: has long shielded good faith religious expression of a clear exemption.
Speaker 2: The speech is not hate propaganda if in good faith
Speaker 2: it says the person expressed or attempted to establish by
Speaker 2: an argument, an opinion on a religious subject, or an
Speaker 2: opinion based on a belief in a religious text. And
Speaker 2: yet we see this former minister as well as a
Speaker 2: former member of parliament in the Scandinavian country. What is
Speaker 2: it Finland, I think or something? But she is now
Speaker 2: on her third trial, She's been found innocent at two
Speaker 2: different levels, and the prosecutor keeps appealing it. What was
Speaker 2: the issue, Well, it was on social media. The church
Speaker 2: that she attended said they were going to have some
Speaker 2: thing that was going to honor LGBT, and she quoted
Speaker 2: the Bible back to them. And because of that, you
Speaker 2: have this prosecutor in the government that is coming against
Speaker 2: this woman, very well known, very well respected, and exercising
Speaker 2: her freedom of religion in terms of talking to other
Speaker 2: people in the same church that she was in coming
Speaker 2: after her shutting down that speech. So on Tuesday evening
Speaker 2: that protection saying well, we're going to make an exception
Speaker 2: and say that it is not hate speech if the
Speaker 2: person is in good faith expressing or attempting to establish
Speaker 2: by an argument or opinion on a religious subject or
Speaker 2: an opinion based on belief in a religious text. It's
Speaker 2: being done by governments everywhere now, and so they said
Speaker 2: that was deleted by the Quebec Bloc at their insistence.
Speaker 2: Conservatives immediately saw this as an opportunity even though they're
Speaker 2: not going to protect free speech and for exercise religion.
Speaker 2: They didn't do it when the lockdown had happen. Pierre
Speaker 2: Poliev warned on x that the amendment would criminalize sections
Speaker 2: of the Bible, the Quran, the Torah and other sacred texts.
Speaker 2: And so one person at Rebel News pointed out the
Speaker 2: hypocrisy that these conservatives were a wall when pastors were
Speaker 2: getting locked up in Canada and churches are being shut down.
Speaker 2: Sheila Gunn read of Rebel NEWSA I'd never forget that
Speaker 2: during COVID, this same political establishment jailed pastors for the
Speaker 2: quote unquote crime of holding warship services. If they were
Speaker 2: willing to imprison pastors for preaching, what do you think
Speaker 2: they'll do with the new criminal code powers aimed expressedly
Speaker 2: explicitly at religiously motivated speech. They've done it before, they'll
Speaker 2: do it again. Bill C nine is not a hate
Speaker 2: speech bill. It is a power seizing bill. It is
Speaker 2: a censorship bill, and it must be defeated. If you
Speaker 2: value for speech, free worship, free thought. Now is the
Speaker 2: time to speak. And again you see all these things
Speaker 2: together in the First Amendment for a reason. You can't
Speaker 2: have freedom of thought without freedom of speech. You can't
Speaker 2: have freedom of religion without all these things. You know,
Speaker 2: what you think, what you say, what you believe, these
Speaker 2: are all tied together, and they must not be restricted, prohibited,
Speaker 2: or mandated by government one way or the other. This
Speaker 2: bill has not been passed yet. It still requires a
Speaker 2: third reading in the House and it needs to pass
Speaker 2: through the Senate, so they're calling that out. You know,
Speaker 2: I mentioned yesterday briefly the Christmas Carold by Charles Dickens.
Speaker 2: It was kind of interesting the history of this, and
Speaker 2: there's a there's an interview on World Magazine w NG
Speaker 2: dot org. They talked to Bruce Forbes, is a holiday
Speaker 2: historian and an author of Christmas a candidate his tree.
Speaker 2: He said, you know, everybody thinks, well, this is the
Speaker 2: way they celebrated Christmas back in Victorian England. He said, actually,
Speaker 2: it wasn't a portrait of Victorian Christmas at the time.
Speaker 2: It actually Dickens actually made Christmas popular when it was
Speaker 2: not popular at the time, and he points out, going
Speaker 2: back to the sixteen hundreds, English Puritans tried to stamp
Speaker 2: out Christmas celebrations based on two main objections. Number One,
Speaker 2: they said, well, it's not an early Christianity, so we're
Speaker 2: not called to do it. Number two, is there too
Speaker 2: much wild partying going on? And again, the way I
Speaker 2: look at it is, you know some people look at
Speaker 2: one day as holier than another. Other people see every
Speaker 2: day is alike. Let everybody follow their conscience, and it
Speaker 2: depends on how you celebrate it. Is it going to
Speaker 2: be wild partying, Is it going to be rampant materialism?
Speaker 2: Or is it going to be an opportunity to reflect
Speaker 2: on the incarnation of Christ and his purpose? And so
Speaker 2: Parliament even went so far as to ban Christmas in
Speaker 2: sixteen forty seven. The historian Forbes said at some points
Speaker 2: they would send town criers around on Christmas Eve crying
Speaker 2: no Christmas, no Christmas. What would Megan Kelly say? And
Speaker 2: Bill O'Reilly? These are the people he used to always
Speaker 2: talk about the war on Christmas every year. Forbes said,
Speaker 2: for a century or more Christmas remained diminished. A survey
Speaker 2: of stories, as a matter of fact from the London
Speaker 2: Times between seventeen ninety and eighteen thirty six shows just
Speaker 2: how much Christmas had fallen out of favor. In twenty
Speaker 2: of those years, nothing at all is said about Christmas,
Speaker 2: and in the other twenty five is mentioned only briefly
Speaker 2: in the kind of sense of, well, that's something that
Speaker 2: people used to do a long time ago. Dickens wrote
Speaker 2: A Christmas Carol just six weeks and he published it
Speaker 2: a few days before Christmas. Only some of the nineteenth
Speaker 2: eighteen forty three. He was up against a deadline and
Speaker 2: just barely making it like we did with this book
Speaker 2: in the bookmark, you know. Anyway, the public reaction was instant.
Speaker 2: They loved it. It sold out, They printed it over and over,
Speaker 2: reprints over and over again the following years, and it
Speaker 2: got very big in America as well. In eighteen sixty eight,
Speaker 2: Dickens sale to the US to perform dramatic readings of
Speaker 2: his books, including A Christmas Carol. I used to watch
Speaker 2: Bonanza when I was a kid. I remember they had
Speaker 2: an episode of Charles Dickens in America and he went
Speaker 2: to the ranch. You know, he got to meet the cartwrights.
Speaker 2: I guess because they got a lot of money anyway,
Speaker 2: Forbes said, it's like he was like a rock star.
Speaker 2: He had one hundred and fifty people waiting overnight to
Speaker 2: get tickets in Boston, and the tickets all sold out,
Speaker 2: So he said Christmas. Carol expressed Dickens' deep concern for
Speaker 2: the poor. And see this is why, you know, when
Speaker 2: my friend who is from the Libertarian Party, he got
Speaker 2: so upset about Dickens because he saw this as the
Speaker 2: wedge that was used to enact socialism, right when in reality,
Speaker 2: you know, we need we understand that they use children.
Speaker 2: As I said before, they're always children, always, and the
Speaker 2: welfare of children is always the poster child for whatever
Speaker 2: it is that they want to do, whether it's setting
Speaker 2: up a digital idea on the internet or whatever it is.
Speaker 2: And yet we do need to be concerned about the
Speaker 2: welfare of children. It's just that we don't need to
Speaker 2: do it through government. And we do need to be
Speaker 2: concerned about the poor, and yet we shouldn't do it
Speaker 2: through government. And even though he wasn't advocating helping the
Speaker 2: people out through government, and even points out you know
Speaker 2: that at one point he said, well don't we have
Speaker 2: poor houses and institutions like that? And you look at
Speaker 2: how they had the government had failed to help the
Speaker 2: poor in that it really was an individual and I
Speaker 2: think that was a key thrust of a Christmas Carol.
Speaker 2: So the story of Ebenezer Scrooge's transformation grabbed a hold
Speaker 2: of the public mind and added a new layer of
Speaker 2: meaning to the holiday, one which laid the groundwork for
Speaker 2: widespread Christian Christmas celebrations, even among those who don't believe
Speaker 2: Christ came as a baby and a manger. And that's
Speaker 2: the other thing about it. You know, we need to
Speaker 2: understand the you know, when you look at dickens Christmas Carol,
Speaker 2: that was one thing that always kind of bothered me.
Speaker 2: You know, it's kind of like the beginning of It's
Speaker 2: a Wonderful Life and the phony angel narrative that's there,
Speaker 2: and you know how we're going to, you know, manipulate
Speaker 2: this guy's life in order to do various things. Still
Speaker 2: helping the poors. Not something that we should despise. Nevertheless,
Speaker 2: it's not, as Dickens puts it out there, it's not
Speaker 2: that good works are going to win us the favor
Speaker 2: of God. There are rewards for good works in both
Speaker 2: this life and the next life. But you're going to
Speaker 2: make sure that you make the next life, and the
Speaker 2: good works are not going to give you eternal life.
Speaker 2: That's what Christ came for, and that's the message I
Speaker 2: think should be of Christmas. As Forbes said, generosity becomes
Speaker 2: the theme that people can embrace, whether they're Christian or not,
Speaker 2: or whether they're religious or not. Generosity is a beautiful
Speaker 2: thing and it's I think Dickens Christmas Carol's greatest contribution.
Speaker 2: It shifts what Christmas becomes. And he made it a
Speaker 2: He made it kind of a secular orientation. You know,
Speaker 2: Jesus said, I am the way, and no one comes
Speaker 2: to the Father but my me. Right, it's a very
Speaker 2: narrow way. It's only one person wide. You come through
Speaker 2: or by Christ, or you don't come at all to
Speaker 2: eternal life. And that is the message of Christmas. Really.
Speaker 2: You know. The some will say that, you know, we've
Speaker 2: seen Bloomberg so many times as say, well, if there
Speaker 2: is a heaven, I'm going straight in because all the
Speaker 2: good things that I've done. So everybody can come up
Speaker 2: with their own set of things that they think earned
Speaker 2: them salvation. God will not be impressed. You know, when
Speaker 2: we disobey him. We have rebelled against him, and that's
Speaker 2: why we don't realize how serious that is, and we
Speaker 2: don't realize why we need Christ. But you know, helping
Speaker 2: the poor, having health care for tiny tim those are
Speaker 2: all great things. But you know, the socialists have made
Speaker 2: those things that the government does, and so today, you know,
Speaker 2: if they would come around a Anezer Scrooge would say, well,
Speaker 2: don't we have welfare programs for those things? I don't
Speaker 2: need to help anybody, And he would miss the personal
Speaker 2: reward of helping someone like that, you know, And these
Speaker 2: are all good things, but still the only way to
Speaker 2: have that life is tooe the Lord Jesus Christ. You
Speaker 2: know Dickens's story. I also thought about the fact that
Speaker 2: he has these three ghosts in it, right, that come back,
Speaker 2: and they're the ones that you know, reason with Scrooge
Speaker 2: and convince him. And I always thought, you know, that's
Speaker 2: really very much like a twisted version of the story
Speaker 2: that Jesus gave about Lazarus and the rich man Luke sixteen.
Speaker 2: And I don't think that's a parable. I think that's
Speaker 2: a real story. He uses real names, even references Abraham.
Speaker 2: He doesn't mention the name of the rich man. Because
Speaker 2: of the context of the story, he realized why he
Speaker 2: doesn't mention that. But you know, we could just call
Speaker 2: him Scrooge for example, right, and or say Marley. It
Speaker 2: would be Marley not Scrooge, because the rich man as
Speaker 2: he is in torment. He begs Abraham and said, let
Speaker 2: me go back and warn my family about this. You know,
Speaker 2: I don't want my brothers to make the same mistakes
Speaker 2: that I have made, and kind of like Marley, right,
Speaker 2: Except what does Abraham say to him? He said, well,
Speaker 2: they have the law and the prophets. If they won't
Speaker 2: listen to them, they won't listen to somebody to come
Speaker 2: back from the dead. I think about that every time
Speaker 2: I watched the show. So what would he tell them, right,
Speaker 2: what would you tell them about that? And what would
Speaker 2: they learn from the law and the prophets. Well, when
Speaker 2: Jesus was confronted with the religious leaders, he said, you
Speaker 2: search the scriptures, that is a law and the prophets,
Speaker 2: because you think in them you will find eternal life.
Speaker 2: But they testify of me, and they do, and that
Speaker 2: is the message of Christmas as well. You know, the
Speaker 2: prophecies and the whole narrative of the Old Testament at
Speaker 2: all points to Christ. It's not about the end of
Speaker 2: the world. It's not about Zionism, it's not about any
Speaker 2: of that stuff. And what happens to israelppens at the
Speaker 2: end of the world. Now, that's such a misreading of revelation.
Speaker 2: People will often call it revelations, and I think it's
Speaker 2: because they think of it as revelations about the end
Speaker 2: of the world. But the actual title is the Revelation
Speaker 2: of Jesus Christ. That's what the Bible is, and start
Speaker 2: to finish and so it testifies of him, and again
Speaker 2: the Law and the prophets testifying. So you know, Marley
Speaker 2: is not going to go back and tell Scrooge this
Speaker 2: Scrooge has got the Law and the prophets and if
Speaker 2: he doesn't want to see what they have to say
Speaker 2: about Christ, then you know, that's the real message of Christmas,
Speaker 2: Trolie Brown. So that's that's the reason that we celebrate it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, it's always any chance you have to remember
Speaker 5: what Christ has done for you.
Speaker 2: That's right, and to tell people, you know, I mean,
Speaker 2: what is the end of the of the Christmas story?
Speaker 2: And nobody ever kept Christmas like Covenant's discreage kept Christmas.
Speaker 2: So it's like, is that it is that the story
Speaker 2: kind of has an anti climactic ending here, right, he
Speaker 2: still dies at some point in time, but they remembered
Speaker 2: him fondly because he was very generous with everybody.
Speaker 5: Well, no one put up more reads than have as
Speaker 5: I hope that that you enjoy the reward of that,
Speaker 5: and that is a rewarding thing, but that.
Speaker 2: Is not the ultimate thing. We'll be right back.
Speaker 5: At the.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, and joining us now is Wayne Morrow.
Speaker 2: He is the CEO of the John Birch Society, and
Speaker 2: he's got something I think is very interesting to talk about,
Speaker 2: and that is Fabian socialism. You probably heard this term before,
Speaker 2: but maybe you don't understand what it is or the
Speaker 2: difference between it and the Marx and Karl Marx's approach,
Speaker 2: and how much more dangerous it is, you know, for
Speaker 2: me growing up, Fabian was a teen idol, and I
Speaker 2: saw Fabian socialism as like, you know, what is that?
Speaker 2: You know? But actually it's a famous Roman general and
Speaker 2: the and I guess Fabian's parents were Italian, and I
Speaker 2: guess maybe that was the namesake, or they might have
Speaker 2: been socialist, I don't know, but anyway, it is it
Speaker 2: is important to understand the distinction because they have very
Speaker 2: different tactics that they use to achieve the same totalitarian goals.
Speaker 2: So joining us now is Waynemorrow, CEO of the John
Speaker 2: Very Society, thank you for joining us, sir.
Speaker 3: Thank you, David, appreciate being here. And yeah, it's Fabian's
Speaker 3: much like the Console formulations, very little known about people
Speaker 3: in their respective countries. It's sort of that secretive, behind
Speaker 3: the scenes group, you know. That's part of the plan,
Speaker 3: you know.
Speaker 2: And you mentioned you told me just as we were
Speaker 2: talking here, just before you came on. How you There's
Speaker 2: also a book that the John Versus Society sells called
Speaker 2: The Fabian Freeway.
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, that book. Yeah, yeah, it's a book we've written,
Speaker 3: asked and we republished it. We have our own publishing
Speaker 3: copy called The Western Islands. And the Fabian Freeway is
Speaker 3: a book about the genesis of the Fabians and how
Speaker 3: impacted our even our US policies and our foreign policies.
Speaker 3: It all ties together, but it's a real good book
Speaker 3: and it's about six hundred pages, so it's not a
Speaker 3: quick read, but it's in depth, and I think it's
Speaker 3: for people are serious students about history and what goes
Speaker 3: on today. Surely I call we're the top of the
Speaker 3: puzzle box. You know, now we understand what goes on.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. We'll tell us a bit about
Speaker 2: us about Fabian socialism. You know, what was it about
Speaker 2: that general that they liked and how does that tell
Speaker 2: us about their tactics and how is it different from Marxism.
Speaker 3: Well, that's a good question. Well, anyway, the genesis is,
Speaker 3: as you mentioned, Quintus Fabius Maximus. He was a Roman general,
Speaker 3: very slow moving. He was very you know, quiet, but
Speaker 3: he was slow and enforceful, and much like the Fabians,
Speaker 3: took its name because that's the process they want. You know,
Speaker 3: their moniker originally was a wolf in sheep's clothing, and
Speaker 3: they didn't work over too well. I figured that one
Speaker 3: out for a while and they said, now we'll go
Speaker 3: switch to a turtle.
Speaker 2: I think the Republicans Democrats could use that imagery as well,
Speaker 2: thanks a donkey and elephant. They could for both of them.
Speaker 3: Yea, they had to change their monica because it wasn't
Speaker 3: going over well. But you know, if you go back
Speaker 3: to the genesis of it all, Cecil Rhodes and Lord
Speaker 3: Milnder were involved in forming this elite group and George
Speaker 3: bernard Shaw was certainly one of the members and the
Speaker 3: web Sydney webinall, and you know, they were very open
Speaker 3: about socialism and you know, there the dispute they had
Speaker 3: between Marx and and in themselves was they wanted to
Speaker 3: believe in the more the ethical, slow moving educational route
Speaker 3: versus violence, and so that was their goal. So you know,
Speaker 3: they formed, you know, the London School of Economics, and
Speaker 3: out of that school, you know, they put in place
Speaker 3: various key legislators in government and even in our institutions
Speaker 3: around the UK. And they knew that by influencing public policy,
Speaker 3: it didn't make any difference who was the elected official
Speaker 3: because they were setting the policy and theise do that
Speaker 3: today as a matter of fact. Yeah, and so George
Speaker 3: Bernardshaw was. He was also very large on eugenics. A
Speaker 3: matter of fact, I don't have that video clip, but
Speaker 3: if you could listen to our audio clip, he talks
Speaker 3: about once every five years, this is this one. We'd
Speaker 3: have to stand front this board to determine if we
Speaker 3: should be living, worthy of staying alive or not. I
Speaker 3: mean actually said that, you know, so he's going to go.
Speaker 3: Imagine that just.
Speaker 2: Destroyed my appreciation of my fair lady, right.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine? And you could listen to them, believe me,
Speaker 3: look them up. Listen to the video audio clip. It's amazing.
Speaker 3: And you know. And so every prime minister, every Labor
Speaker 3: Party member of the UK is part of is a Fabian.
Speaker 3: And so the Fabian's goal is is always has been,
Speaker 3: as we call it, socialism with a slow walk to Marxism.
Speaker 3: And what they wanted to do is govern every aspect
Speaker 3: of your life and forced globalism. So as you see
Speaker 3: now today with kier Starverer, who by the way, as
Speaker 3: a Fabian as well as the mayor of London, you're watching,
Speaker 3: it happened, the country being destroyed. And I have podcasts
Speaker 3: with folks in London and I tell them this is
Speaker 3: all to q this is exactly what the plan is,
Speaker 3: to destroy their heritage, their history, to bring in usher
Speaker 3: and world government. Now, when you say yes.
Speaker 2: Yes, when you say they're Fabians, is there still an
Speaker 2: organization that they belong as an active member like somebody
Speaker 2: would belong to the joint John Birsh Society. So they
Speaker 2: actually society there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yes, yeah. Tony Blair is a member of the Fabians,
Speaker 3: you know, he's very active with it. By the way,
Speaker 3: now with the World Economic Forum. Interesting but if you
Speaker 3: go online you can look up the Fabian Society. They
Speaker 3: have organization in Australia. They're young Fabians, you know, but
Speaker 3: they exist. I mean they exist today and when I
Speaker 3: speak to the British, very few really understand the Fabians.
Speaker 3: Liz Trust. I met Liz Trust who passed Prime Minister.
Speaker 3: I was at a CEO conference and I gave her
Speaker 3: my card and I said, I'll send you a copy
Speaker 3: of the Fabian Freeway. Now she's actively doing you phenomenous.
Speaker 3: Not because they said you never mentioned the Fabians, Liz,
Speaker 3: but you know, I think she knew exactly what they were.
Speaker 3: But the whole thing was David back in Woodjaw Wilson's
Speaker 3: days when he actually worked with Colonel mandel House, another globalist,
Speaker 3: they formed this thing called the Inquiry, And the inquir
Speaker 3: was a group of men, we're British and Us and
Speaker 3: they disguised how are we going to work together and
Speaker 3: kind of really conquer the world as far as the
Speaker 3: political agenda and then eventually total and so that was
Speaker 3: a genesis of the Council and Formulations. So the Council
Speaker 3: Formulation which is housed in New York City. They and
Speaker 3: the Fabians work together as we speak today and setting
Speaker 3: governance and policy. And they do that regardless what the
Speaker 3: elections look like. They're behind the scenes doing foreign policy.
Speaker 3: And that's why we always look at each other, why
Speaker 3: doesn't everything change, Well, it's because behind the scenes, the
Speaker 3: same folks have been working the agenda. That's what's going on.
Speaker 3: And we have to bring the light to the UK
Speaker 3: people as well as the United States that this group,
Speaker 3: these groups are hard at work directing our foreign policy.
Speaker 3: But our future it is for world governs. It's nothing
Speaker 3: to do with freedom, I agree. And our job at
Speaker 3: the Bird Society is through education to make people aware
Speaker 3: of who they are so we know what to do.
Speaker 3: It's not mystical, it's not magical. It's not a beauty
Speaker 3: contest when you like somebody. But we have to know.
Speaker 3: The threats are reel and we see it today.
Speaker 2: Yes, it sounds very much like Antonio Gramsey, the father
Speaker 2: of the Italian Communist Party's strategy where he wanted to
Speaker 2: march through the institutions. How is it different than Gramsey's
Speaker 2: communism because and I mentioned Antonio Gramsey because Pete Boutigue
Speaker 2: is what I call him, because he's very proud of that.
Speaker 2: But you know, his father has spent his entire career
Speaker 2: at Notre Dame. That was really his specialty, Antonio Gramsey,
Speaker 2: and he had him go to Harvard where he studied
Speaker 2: under sac Van Berkovich, who was also very much a
Speaker 2: fan of Italian communism. And he changed his name to
Speaker 2: Honor Socco and Benzetti. And so you know that I've focused.
Speaker 2: I learned something about Antonio Gramsey because of Booty Gay,
Speaker 2: but I also called it booty Marks because that's really
Speaker 2: where they're trying to take us. But again it is
Speaker 2: a slow march through the institutions. And so what is
Speaker 2: the difference is that that one of them was Italian
Speaker 2: and the other one was predominantly English and American kind
Speaker 2: of Anglo. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, Gramsky was involved as an Italian. He was from
Speaker 3: Sardinia and he was grew up in that area of farmy.
Speaker 3: Watch the farmer owners take advantage of the farmer workers.
Speaker 3: He actually has a book called David called the Gramsky
Speaker 3: papers prison papers, and that's about this thing I have
Speaker 3: behind me in my library. And it was written on
Speaker 3: toilet paper, by the way, you know what it was
Speaker 3: worth to his sister, and it became the Gramsky the
Speaker 3: prison papers. And Gramsky was, you know, a threat to
Speaker 3: the Nazis in Germany, and that's why it was called
Speaker 3: a friend school. And Hitler tossed them out of the
Speaker 3: United States. They end up in CLUBB University. And so
Speaker 3: the goal then was then to indoctrinate and reduce the
Speaker 3: morality of young college students and shove down their throat
Speaker 3: socialism communism. So now we have the professors from various
Speaker 3: institutions in the country about remember that than the sixties,
Speaker 3: about the hippie moving. All that was all coming from
Speaker 3: the Frankfurt School through Columbia University. Destroy they knew they have.
Speaker 3: This is what Grahamsky said, David. We can't destroy the
Speaker 3: United States or Western societies. We talked to it economically,
Speaker 3: that's hard. Yeah, we have to change them morally, because
Speaker 3: if we could do that, we can destroy the morality,
Speaker 3: because that's the glule holds them together. Then we can
Speaker 3: destroy them. And that's what that's the whole story with
Speaker 3: the Frankfurt School, which ended up in Club University. If
Speaker 3: you think about it, where we are back in the
Speaker 3: forties to where today, you could see the morality of
Speaker 3: the United States go in the other direction. And that's
Speaker 3: all according to.
Speaker 2: Plan, and that's why they got so heavily involved in
Speaker 2: Hollywood and the entertainment business as well.
Speaker 3: Absolutely correct, and that's what happened. So they knew that's
Speaker 3: exactly one of the key points that makes the United
Speaker 3: States and Western civilation so strong is our moral behavior
Speaker 3: and our beliefs. So that's what we see today. But
Speaker 3: that's the difference between the two. And so they're Marxist,
Speaker 3: but they used that social element. They said Karl Marx
Speaker 3: wasn't right. He thought economics is the only way. No,
Speaker 3: we're going to have to do the moral end of it.
Speaker 3: So that's they morphed it into another strategy. But it's
Speaker 3: all the same. Man goal is toll slavery, and you.
Speaker 2: Can see that very much in what Sock van Berkovich
Speaker 2: focused on there at Harvard. Everything for him was a
Speaker 2: product of Puritanism, and so we've got to overthrow this
Speaker 2: whole the puritan roots of America and we've got to
Speaker 2: attack it at its foundation. But he was really what
Speaker 2: he was trying to do was to attack the moral
Speaker 2: foundation of the country. That's why he focused on that
Speaker 2: so much. But everything he talked about was in terms
Speaker 2: of that. You know, well this is because of the
Speaker 2: you know, the Mayflower, and they's got to get rid
Speaker 2: of of that. But it is kind of interesting, and
Speaker 2: of course we see other approaches as well. You had
Speaker 2: people like Bill Ayers. Okay, uh, they decided that they
Speaker 2: would They said, well, we've had class struggles over you know,
Speaker 2: for Marxism in Europe. That's not going to work here.
Speaker 2: It's not working here that well, so let's go to
Speaker 2: a race struggle. So there's yet another approach that the
Speaker 2: communists have taken. They've got so many different prongs to
Speaker 2: get all of them take us to the same hell,
Speaker 2: don't they Well.
Speaker 3: Roads, yeah, we do the dirty work for them. We
Speaker 3: have you know, class struggles, men against women, that's another
Speaker 3: big one right now, children against their parents, black versus
Speaker 3: white or tan. It's all about it's all about conflict
Speaker 3: and war. That's the you know, that's the that's their
Speaker 3: goal because they need that to enforce more rules and
Speaker 3: regulations in the government and less freedom. You guys can't
Speaker 3: play nice, Okay, Well, we're going to incite that and there,
Speaker 3: and you know that Marxist knew that one of the goals,
Speaker 3: and it's well written over a period of time, lots
Speaker 3: of documentation on how that works. But that's the goal.
Speaker 3: So they're playing to our frailties of humans, you know,
Speaker 3: rich versus poor, Black versus white, Tan versus white Chinese, whatever,
Speaker 3: doesn't make a difference because their endgame is world government
Speaker 3: and they know that they can't have a lot of us,
Speaker 3: so we have to we have to exterminate some. So
Speaker 3: I'll let those guys exterminate themselves. And that's what we see,
Speaker 3: you know, And we're seeing that now in the UK
Speaker 3: as we start a conversation about the Fabians. As I
Speaker 3: talked to the folks in the UK, we're watching their
Speaker 3: country and I used to live there and work there
Speaker 3: and Oxfordshire, so I know the country rather well. And
Speaker 3: I'm watching those folks being destroyed by the invaders on purpose.
Speaker 3: But they're doing their dirty work destroying all their history
Speaker 3: in terror and terror into those folks in Ireland as
Speaker 3: well as the UK and they're concerned, but I'm seeing
Speaker 3: a resurgence of the British citizen rising up. It was
Speaker 3: about a month ago. You recalling in London they had
Speaker 3: people marching with the British flag. It wasn't two hundred thousand, David,
Speaker 3: we had people that were there in the city. It
Speaker 3: was more like three million people were there. And you'll
Speaker 3: see farmer trucks now marching into London with their tractors.
Speaker 3: And they don't want to be slaves. And I've talked
Speaker 3: enough Europeans. They don't want to be part of the
Speaker 3: European ac any long they're losing their sovereignty. They love
Speaker 3: their history, David, and they really respect and when I
Speaker 3: travel throughout Europe when I lived there, they really love
Speaker 3: their history and they love their heritage. It's being destroyed
Speaker 3: systematically and it does not work. One thing I wanted
Speaker 3: to tell you, which is interesting, I found out talking
Speaker 3: to several of the folks within, you know, past legislators.
Speaker 3: They tell me they get their news about the United
Speaker 3: States in two ways, CNN and the New York Times.
Speaker 3: Was that how you did? Yeah, yeah, yeah, you got
Speaker 3: to see CNN. I go, what does that doing in there?
Speaker 3: You know? I'm in a you know, I'm in Hungary
Speaker 3: or I'm in Italy. I'm watching CNN. But that's how
Speaker 3: they look at the United States. I said, well, that's
Speaker 3: totally upside down, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well I had a friend who worked in the
Speaker 2: Pentagon and about twenty thirty years ago, and when I
Speaker 2: talked to him, he said, yeah, CNN is playing on
Speaker 2: the screen all over the Pentagon, all the different rooms
Speaker 2: and everything, and oh, yeah.
Speaker 3: That's Communism's network.
Speaker 2: That's right. It's uh, it's very important that who you
Speaker 2: listen to, and you know, and I've always tried to
Speaker 2: listen to various sources, and I would go to the
Speaker 2: I always preferred people who would tell me what they
Speaker 2: think and why they think it, rather than the people
Speaker 2: who try to be this mushy middle like Time and Newsweek,
Speaker 2: you know. So I was always looking at the Nation
Speaker 2: or National Review or something like that, even though I
Speaker 2: don't support their views, I'd like to see that conflict
Speaker 2: that was there because a lot of times that would
Speaker 2: help me to understand where I stood on the issue.
Speaker 2: So I try to get these people that are opposed
Speaker 2: to each other, but most people just go for something
Speaker 2: like Time or Newsweek or CNN, and that's kind of
Speaker 2: the mushy middle that's out there by the mockingbird programs
Speaker 2: that are out there for people. But that's why it's
Speaker 2: very important for people to educate themselves. And that's a
Speaker 2: very important thing that you do at the John Birs Society.
Speaker 2: Tell us a little bit about the John Bird Society
Speaker 2: and how it's.
Speaker 3: When we started nineteen Yeah, we started nineteen fifty eight. Education.
Speaker 3: You know, education is really critical for us, educating people
Speaker 3: about American values. Our job is limited government. Now so
Speaker 3: people call us far right, that's not true. We're actually
Speaker 3: constitutional matters some form of government are not total. All
Speaker 3: the left is all the isms, clean fascism right. And
Speaker 3: our job is to teach American Americanism. It is not
Speaker 3: taught anymore. So we have free courses online the JBS
Speaker 3: dot org about teaching about the Constitution. And we said,
Speaker 3: how do you elect constitutional matter representative, state, local, or
Speaker 3: federal if you don't know the playbook? So how do
Speaker 3: you holdm accountable? And it's not taught on purpose, so
Speaker 3: now it becomes a personality contest. We don't want that,
Speaker 3: So we teach people Americanism and we give them the
Speaker 3: history and we show them who's behind the curtain, like
Speaker 3: we mentioned the Fabians and the CFR, and who's forming
Speaker 3: foreign policy. And once people know what goes on, that'si
Speaker 3: what we call it a conspiracy. It's not theory any longer,
Speaker 3: but the conspiracy says this. The first goal is to
Speaker 3: deny is exists. Of course, so we said, look, let's
Speaker 3: expose him. It's not us. That's why I have a
Speaker 3: thousand books behind me, is that over the course of
Speaker 3: time it proves that they does exist and they actually
Speaker 3: come out and talk about it. It's interesting as we
Speaker 3: as we look through time and look through history. I
Speaker 3: always go back to my UK experience where Autus Huxley
Speaker 3: was a Fabian. I'll go back to that for a
Speaker 3: second answer your question. And what happened is he was
Speaker 3: writing is this guy was a young author write and
Speaker 3: all the information about what he heard. He was so
Speaker 3: excited about it that he decided to write a book.
Speaker 3: And he said, I can't use my pen name. My
Speaker 3: name is Eric Blair. I can't use that. I have
Speaker 3: to use a pen name. So I think my name
Speaker 3: is George and or what Joe George orwell is really
Speaker 3: the Eric Blair, and he wrote nineteen eighty four about
Speaker 3: the Fabians, and the question becomes is why is it
Speaker 3: in nineteen eighty four. Well, January fourth of eighteen eighty
Speaker 3: four is the foundation of the Fabians. And they said,
Speaker 3: with the one hundred years we have world government. That's
Speaker 3: why that book's titled nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 2: Oh so that's I'd heard people say, because he wrote
Speaker 2: it in nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 3: But yeah, yeah, I don't be because he was indoctrinated
Speaker 3: by H. G. Wells and Alex Huxley about when he
Speaker 3: writes about Big Brother new Speak, that's all about the Fabians.
Speaker 3: And now that said Vogue, I'm saying, hey, look that
Speaker 3: wasn't done as a science fiction. That was really his
Speaker 3: telling you. And he couldn't, you know, hold himself. He said,
Speaker 3: I have to really talk about this. That's why it's
Speaker 3: and I believe, I personally believe that's why it's nineteen
Speaker 3: eighty four. It's one hundred years of existence. And of
Speaker 3: course I mentioned the Consoling Formulations is a child of
Speaker 3: the Fabians. And now we have an American version that
Speaker 3: we have, you know, the European version work in Unison.
Speaker 3: So our job is in Burtu society is educate people
Speaker 3: what's going on to be personally responsible, to elect constitutional
Speaker 3: moderates and constitutional I did representatives, state, local, and federal,
Speaker 3: so we can monitor not only our behavior, but go
Speaker 3: back to constitutional based law and not rule by elitists.
Speaker 3: And that's what we see today.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so you know, and it's important for people
Speaker 2: to understand how many different ways they come at us
Speaker 2: in order to set up a thetlitarian government. They have
Speaker 2: so many different tactics and strategies. And of course one
Speaker 2: of those I think that you're talking about all the
Speaker 2: Suxley and others like that, HG. Wells and Huxley, the
Speaker 2: technocracy that was there. I mean, talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about technocracy as well. That's really kind of coming to us.
Speaker 2: People don't really know where to fit that, you know,
Speaker 2: because it doesn't really fit into the left right paradigm,
Speaker 2: and yet it seems to be on the ascendancy as well.
Speaker 2: Talk about a little bit about that.
Speaker 3: Well, well you know the story about technology, you know.
Speaker 3: But ex have a fell used to be a member
Speaker 3: of the birth side. Whereas the CIA said, smile a
Speaker 3: lot because your picture gets taken about three hour times
Speaker 3: a day, that's right. Bank, Yeah, you go bank, grocery store,
Speaker 3: going to good gas. But technocracy is a tool for
Speaker 3: monitoring and governance, and that's why you see i AI
Speaker 3: data data centers and know every little thing that you've done.
Speaker 3: And they openly said this in the Bank of International Settlements.
Speaker 3: They want to have this digital currency where they can
Speaker 3: monitor any of your expenditures from one hundred dollars on up,
Speaker 3: so they can determine by checking China, if you have
Speaker 3: a bad social score, then you're not going to buy anything.
Speaker 3: So if you think about technology is going to be
Speaker 3: their weapon or tool to keep you in line. That's
Speaker 3: why I see it happening, and they're doing it through
Speaker 3: a lot of different angles. It looks kind of cool,
Speaker 3: but that's really the goal.
Speaker 2: One of the things I began the problem with today
Speaker 2: was talking about the fact that you know, I mentioned
Speaker 2: all the time about how artificial intelligence is really going
Speaker 2: to be a superpower for any kind of government tyranny
Speaker 2: to be able to monitor you and everything interro doing
Speaker 2: as you're just talking about, but also to manipulate opinion
Speaker 2: as well. And that's why is very concerning to me
Speaker 2: to see that this latest executive order from Trump that
Speaker 2: essentially presumes to prohibit any state laws that would curb
Speaker 2: things that are happening with AI companies, because I think
Speaker 2: what where that would really happen would be with the
Speaker 2: data centers. I think that's where the big conflict is
Speaker 2: going to come. And you know, that is the bottleneck
Speaker 2: for them, and that would be one of the ways
Speaker 2: that you could limit them to buy a little bit
Speaker 2: of time to try to get some control of the
Speaker 2: situation or structure to keep some of these things at bay.
Speaker 2: But again, to prohibit that at the federal level, and
Speaker 2: that is in direct conflict with a tenth Amendment. And
Speaker 2: of course the Democrats will tell you that now because
Speaker 2: they're not empower but as soon as they get embowered,
Speaker 2: they don't care about a tenth Amendment either. But it
Speaker 2: is really a real concern about this concentration of power
Speaker 2: and the you know, the destructure of the tenth Amendment,
Speaker 2: and of course the enforcement mechanism that is going to
Speaker 2: run through is going to be to use financial carrots
Speaker 2: and sticks for people coming out of the federal government.
Speaker 2: That's the way they always get around the tenth Amendment, Isn't.
Speaker 3: It absolutely correct? Yes, the technocracy. That's exactly what we
Speaker 3: call technocracy, the techno bureaucrats, that's where they use that
Speaker 3: technology as I call digital prison. That's basically where you're
Speaker 3: looking at, yes, and that's kind of where we're at,
Speaker 3: and that's what they're setting up. Digital prison, So you
Speaker 3: can't go any words and do anything within your fifteen
Speaker 3: minute city whatever you want to be to monitor where
Speaker 3: you are and so lose all your freedoms.
Speaker 2: They're constantly coming up with different justifications to take us
Speaker 2: to the same kind of orwelly in hell that they
Speaker 2: want to set up. And that's why you know, when
Speaker 2: you look at the Chinese kindness meantimes, I'd look at
Speaker 2: them and say, okay, so are they Are they really
Speaker 2: communists anymore? Are they fascists? Because they've kind of merged
Speaker 2: economics and politics to a great extent there, and it's
Speaker 2: highly nationalistic and all the rest of these other things.
Speaker 2: So it's important to understand all these different strains, but
Speaker 2: then to not get boxed in by any of them.
Speaker 2: To understand these people mix and match. They'll take whatever
Speaker 2: they can use me these different strategies, and you know,
Speaker 2: when you look at them, if you were to construct
Speaker 2: they've been diagram It seems like they're all starting to
Speaker 2: reach convergence instead of one little point of overlap, doesn't it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly. Well, you know, communism is just a tool,
Speaker 3: that's all. It's a tool for global governance. It's not
Speaker 3: to be all end all, just like any other religious
Speaker 3: things that we see. God, it's got nothing to do
Speaker 3: with it at all. Matter of fact, the men who
Speaker 3: are globalists are not communists. They're not. It's a tool.
Speaker 3: They're not fascists, but they use that mentality. But it's
Speaker 3: all the tool for world government. It's all going to
Speaker 3: come through the United Nations, and you see the UN
Speaker 3: that's the center point of it all. And we have
Speaker 3: a magazine called the New American and matter of fact,
Speaker 3: we're actually launching it in there called a New European.
Speaker 2: And I can show you this, Oh good, yeah.
Speaker 3: Matt here, David. These are little bubble diagrams. If you
Speaker 3: can see this, all these are all the UN offices
Speaker 3: in the world. They're not just one location.
Speaker 2: And you know these rivers and brush, Yeah, what are.
Speaker 3: These people doing all these locations? Well, you're on the menu,
Speaker 3: that's what's going on. So you can imagine all those.
Speaker 3: You know, it's all over the United States. So I'd
Speaker 3: be happy to send this to you. A New American magazine,
Speaker 3: we have this one called the Global paragrab We did
Speaker 3: this one and it talked and I show this around
Speaker 3: the Australians and the New Zealands, and the UK folks
Speaker 3: and the Lady and France. They were totally amazed the
Speaker 3: depth of the United Nations, all these offices all over
Speaker 3: the world. Yes, and they're busy carving up the world
Speaker 3: for global governance. So that's that's our part of our
Speaker 3: job at the Birch Site, expose what's happening through education
Speaker 3: and make it worries it's not too late because it's
Speaker 3: more of us than them, and they know that our job.
Speaker 3: Their job is to keep us off message and looking
Speaker 3: at sports figures or Hollywood or this or that the
Speaker 3: same time they're destroying our foundational principles of freedom.
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely yeah. I've had Alex Newman on many times.
Speaker 2: I've talked to Alex and a great guy there at
Speaker 2: the New American, and I've had other people as well
Speaker 2: from Then American. It's great publication and as you point
Speaker 2: out with that map, and you see all the different
Speaker 2: areas where they have areas of responsibility and actual physical
Speaker 2: locations and everything. I think that's the key thing for
Speaker 2: people to understand is that it's not necessarily going to
Speaker 2: be as you point out in Brussels, when you say, well,
Speaker 2: there's the seat of Government or whatever, or the East
Speaker 2: River of New York. It really is not so much
Speaker 2: about that. It's about global governance. It's about this network
Speaker 2: of different organizations that are out there. And that's one
Speaker 2: of the things that I see about technocracy is really
Speaker 2: that not just you know, the electronic network networking that's
Speaker 2: out there, but actually the political networking that is there,
Speaker 2: and the interlocking of these different financial interests that are
Speaker 2: out there. So they can all have their own goals
Speaker 2: and things, but it is all pushing us towards this
Speaker 2: global governance, and the technology is really giving them power
Speaker 2: that they've never had before. That's the key thing that's
Speaker 2: really concerning me.
Speaker 3: So we saw that with COVID nineteen was a good
Speaker 3: status said beta test for them, how he had the
Speaker 3: whole world under control. I'm sure they were absolutely laughing
Speaker 3: in a maze how easy it was.
Speaker 2: I know that happened. I know I was absolutely astounded
Speaker 2: how easy it was for them as well. And again
Speaker 2: I think you know, you look at the stimulus checks
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff. That was training
Speaker 2: wheels for universal basic income, which was something that Elon
Speaker 2: Musk has always been focused on. When you had Andrew
Speaker 2: Yang come out so that he was going to run
Speaker 2: for president and that was going to be his issue,
Speaker 2: the main issue. He branched out in some other things
Speaker 2: later on. But as say, as he came out said
Speaker 2: universal basic income, Elon Musk canted him a million dollars.
Speaker 2: You know, he wanted him to push that idea. Well,
Speaker 2: it got pushed really big in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: That's all part of the that's all part of the
Speaker 3: program universal income to the UN. Yeah, of course, it
Speaker 3: is the whole job. That they want you to be industrious.
Speaker 3: They want you to be collective not individualists, and we
Speaker 3: fight collectivism. We believe in individualism, not collectivism. That's all
Speaker 3: part of the rule. You know, there's a called the
Speaker 3: herd mentality, and that's exactly what they need to control us.
Speaker 3: It's all that's the end game is that world government,
Speaker 3: and they will determine. As I mentioned early on, we
Speaker 3: start in the show George Manarshaw before the Eugenics Committee
Speaker 3: who lives and who dies? And you may not have
Speaker 3: that choice. If you're a strong crowd Christian or belief
Speaker 3: you may not fit into because they're amoral, they don't
Speaker 3: have any beliefs. The state is their belief. You may
Speaker 3: not fit into their program. If you can't be indoctrinated correctly,
Speaker 3: you may be exterminated. And that's they're written about that.
Speaker 3: So it's these guys play for keeps and it's serious.
Speaker 3: And our job has been to expose their plan since
Speaker 3: the late fifties what they want to do, and they're
Speaker 3: very open about it, not more so than ever because
Speaker 3: they feel like young adults have been so indoctrinated through
Speaker 3: the universities of school that socialism is good. Like we
Speaker 3: saw the last mayor race in.
Speaker 2: New York City.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine. Yeah, yeah, nothing's free.
Speaker 2: The schools have indoctrinated that. But then we also have
Speaker 2: the situation where you know, the gen Z people are
Speaker 2: finding it very kids are finding it very difficult to
Speaker 2: find a job. Even if they go to college, they're
Speaker 2: finding it difficult to find a job. And that is
Speaker 2: something I think that really drives this because again, one
Speaker 2: of the things that socialism has always pushed out there,
Speaker 2: I think is envy. You know, they find these different
Speaker 2: at its core. I think like Sallensky, you know, dedicated
Speaker 2: his book Rules for Radicals to Satan, and I think
Speaker 2: at the core of it, there's all these different satanic
Speaker 2: appeals to the evil aspects of our nature, you know,
Speaker 2: whether it's about greed, whether it's about envy, whether it's
Speaker 2: about hatred, racism, tribal all these different things, and they
Speaker 2: identify these things and seek to exploit them with these
Speaker 2: different approaches that they take, you know. And so that's
Speaker 2: what I think is you have to be aware of
Speaker 2: the tactics and the strategies that are there for ever
Speaker 2: going to be able to defeat them. Otherwise we're just
Speaker 2: putting in their hands, aren't we.
Speaker 3: That's exactly and you're exactly correct. That's exactly what they do.
Speaker 3: They pit one group against another one philosophy because it's
Speaker 3: all about conflict. It's all about the conflict that's critically important.
Speaker 3: But we have to identify what it is and expose
Speaker 3: what it is that's really important, so we know the game.
Speaker 3: It's a sure, it's you remember they remember the movie
Speaker 3: where we had with Julie Garland Folly Yellovick Road, you know,
Speaker 3: and all of a sudden, who's a man behind the curtain,
Speaker 3: don't pay attention to him? Well, we expose who's behind
Speaker 3: the curtain, you know, And that's really what it's all about.
Speaker 3: It's really a plan. It's not done by accident. And
Speaker 3: we see a lot of kubuki theater, yes, but the
Speaker 3: thing is is that we identify really what it is.
Speaker 3: And to tell you what, it's very difficult for people
Speaker 3: to believe it because some of their heroes of the
Speaker 3: past who are not good.
Speaker 2: People's right, or the heroes of the present or the present.
Speaker 3: I mentioned by George Bernardshaw, the guy was you know,
Speaker 3: think about that one. Well, I mean I can go on,
Speaker 3: but there's a lot of them, and they were not
Speaker 3: who they thought they were.
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, he wrote Pigmalion, which was then turned
Speaker 2: into My Fair Lady, you know, the musical on the play,
Speaker 2: and you know, I enjoy the music with that, but
Speaker 2: uh yeah, the guy who was there. And even when
Speaker 2: you look at all these different science fiction novels, they've
Speaker 2: basically become a blueprint for them. But we're talking about
Speaker 2: how that you like to set up conflict between different groups.
Speaker 2: That's why I think we really need to have our
Speaker 2: guard up about partisan politics, because that is another way
Speaker 2: they do it. They don't just do it by race
Speaker 2: or by sex or this or that. They do it
Speaker 2: also with political factions. And you know, when people buy
Speaker 2: into these things and start to excuse the actions of
Speaker 2: their leaders, what they really need to do is to
Speaker 2: look at the longer historical view and say, where were
Speaker 2: the Fabian socialists trying to take us? You know, where
Speaker 2: were the Gramcy socialists trying to take us? Where were
Speaker 2: the Marxists trying to take us? And if the actions
Speaker 2: of the person that's the hero of your party is
Speaker 2: going to move us in the direction of these socialists
Speaker 2: and Marxists, then you need to pull back and say
Speaker 2: we're not going to follow that, even though that's part
Speaker 2: of our tribe here or whatever. I think that's very exactly.
Speaker 3: You know, elections change governments, but institutions change nations. That's
Speaker 3: really important. They actually famous even said that. They also
Speaker 3: said power shifts from representation to management, and that's where
Speaker 3: we are no matter you know, it's left or right.
Speaker 3: You know, on the politics scene, the policy being stepped
Speaker 3: forward doesn't make a difference who runs back and forth.
Speaker 3: It's all kabuki theater for us because they're not setting
Speaker 3: the policy someone else's and we identify who they are.
Speaker 3: That's really critically important. So it's all a big game
Speaker 3: in front of us. But we have to identify really
Speaker 3: who they are, what's happening, And that's all part of
Speaker 3: what we do. Educate people and make them aware there's
Speaker 3: more of us than them. But our job is to
Speaker 3: wake people up, and sometimes they don't want to they
Speaker 3: want to hear about it. You know, our job is
Speaker 3: awake people. I've been telling really what's going on. Much
Speaker 3: like the story gave to the UK folks about the Fabians.
Speaker 3: I said, look, they're destroying your country on plan. It's
Speaker 3: not by accident, that's why, you know.
Speaker 2: I question you, so, do they still have a Fabian
Speaker 2: society that people belong to because typically these things are
Speaker 2: done in secret, you know, or quietly, so you have
Speaker 2: secret societies, you know, things like the Masons or whatever,
Speaker 2: but you know people will be members of this. But
Speaker 2: I don't think do we have a Fabian society that
Speaker 2: you have politicians that are part of Here in the
Speaker 2: US or is it mainly the CFR that you'll see.
Speaker 3: Mostly the CFR. Yeah, yeah, that's exactly what's it's a
Speaker 3: it's more what it's a partner of with the Fabians.
Speaker 3: So back to Sea Rhodes and Lord Milner and and
Speaker 3: you know Wildrow Wilson took Amanda House. They had the
Speaker 3: thing called the Inquiry back in nineteen hundreds or so,
Speaker 3: and they formed this group and they went to the
Speaker 3: United States and Council for Relation was born in nineteen
Speaker 3: twenty one, and they're going to set foreign policy up
Speaker 3: March through through David Rockefeller. And today you have members
Speaker 3: of the cabinet forty fifty percent of the people and
Speaker 3: presidential cabinets were part of the CFR, had Clinton and Eisenhower,
Speaker 3: all those guys were all involved in the CFR. They
Speaker 3: knew exactly what was going on. So they were carrying
Speaker 3: the water for the CFR Policy Group, and that's exactly
Speaker 3: what goes on. So it was all it looked good,
Speaker 3: you know, but reality is one of the stories goes
Speaker 3: this way. You know, every every year, every year several years,
Speaker 3: we have an election. It's like when you're in high school,
Speaker 3: you know, they remember the president of the student council,
Speaker 3: remember those back in high school.
Speaker 2: Contest?
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, And by the way, I'm going to have
Speaker 3: longer lunch hours, We're going to have less homework, right,
Speaker 3: And all of a sudden they get a who's running
Speaker 3: the show, the super of the principal high school. They
Speaker 3: never happened, And that's the story with the CFR. We
Speaker 3: have a beauty contest, which is a public you know,
Speaker 3: either presidential election or congressional and then who's running the
Speaker 3: show behind the scenes. That's really it's really those groups,
Speaker 3: those unelected bureaucratic officials are unelected, and we expose what
Speaker 3: they are. We have that book called The Shadows of Power.
Speaker 3: Another book that we published years ago called the Shadows
Speaker 3: of Power exposes the Council on formulations War one or two,
Speaker 3: Korean Vietnam, how they all morphed into all part of
Speaker 3: the plan. That's called the Shadows of Power. So now
Speaker 3: we so the Fabians is Freeways about the Fabians. The
Speaker 3: Shadows of Power is about the Council formulations. And once
Speaker 3: people look at history, they get pretty angry because they
Speaker 3: know it's all been a theater for not for us,
Speaker 3: but for them, and they play the game to make
Speaker 3: it look like you're running the show, but you're not.
Speaker 3: You're just a victim of the globalst plan.
Speaker 2: I agree. And when I think of the John Versus Society,
Speaker 2: you guys have done a great job of educating people
Speaker 2: about the Council on Formulations, the CFR stuff, and yet
Speaker 2: we still have these people run for office and I
Speaker 2: think you'll see them proudly list that as part of
Speaker 2: their CV you know that, Yeah, a member of the
Speaker 2: Council form Relations, And it surprises It's like I'm part
Speaker 2: of the Satanic group over here. It it's you know,
Speaker 2: they see it as a you know, because it really
Speaker 2: does have a lot of pinash or whatever or clout
Speaker 2: in Washington to be a member of that club, and
Speaker 2: they're proud of it, and so we need to call
Speaker 2: them out on it, and we need to understand the
Speaker 2: history of it. We need to understand really just how
Speaker 2: evil the actions have been and how that has really
Speaker 2: been there. So I guess in the UK they still
Speaker 2: have people who are part of the Fabian Society, but
Speaker 2: here you'll see it in the CFR and they'll be
Speaker 2: doing the same.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Bill Clinton was a member of Madam Albury was
Speaker 3: a member, Robert Rubin was a member of the Cohen
Speaker 3: Larry Summers, George W. Bush was going on, Lea Rice,
Speaker 3: Colin Power, Robert Gates, Henry Paulson, Briock Obama was president.
Speaker 3: Describing candidate Timmy Gaither, Susan Rice, you know, John Bolton, Henrymaster,
Speaker 3: and Mike Pompeo. I Doan, you know, I see what's
Speaker 3: going on here. So they're in strategic locations to monitor
Speaker 3: and steer public policy. That's what it's going on. So
Speaker 3: when you see this, we hear the song guards of
Speaker 3: his Democrat Republican and you get to the same place
Speaker 3: all the time. That's right, that's the key.
Speaker 2: And I remember when Reagan got elected, people were excited
Speaker 2: like he's not CFR, you know, and I can't remember
Speaker 2: the last time we had a president that wasn't CFR.
Speaker 2: And yet what he did with it. But CFR people
Speaker 2: in all the different positions around him, you know.
Speaker 3: Yes, exactly. Well Trump is not a member of the CFR.
Speaker 3: I can tell you that. So he's not a member,
Speaker 3: but he's got people around to make sure this get
Speaker 3: too far off of the script, although he does.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. Yeah, I think what Trump is
Speaker 2: really as much as anything as the technocracy, because these
Speaker 2: guys are writ in the checks there. I'm very concerned that,
Speaker 2: you know, we all know now what the CBDC is,
Speaker 2: and yet I think the same thing can be accomplished
Speaker 2: with a stable coin, and they can make a lot
Speaker 2: of money putting the stable coin out there at the
Speaker 2: same time. So it's one way that they can get rich.
Speaker 2: They can get rich off of that, or they can't
Speaker 2: get rich off of the CBDC. And since everybody's kind
Speaker 2: of wise to the game of the CBDC, they don't
Speaker 2: realize that stable coin is still going to have those
Speaker 2: capabilities to be able to turn off your ability to
Speaker 2: trade and do other things like that. Tell us a
Speaker 2: little bit about the John Vers society. I mean, I
Speaker 2: know you guys have had a lot of fights and that.
Speaker 2: Have you been hit with any kind of dbanking or
Speaker 2: stuff like that, because I mean I have, and I've
Speaker 2: been kicked off of PayPal and Vemo and other formats
Speaker 2: like that because of things that I was saying in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty about the lockdown and the pandemic in the vaccine,
Speaker 2: climate change and all the rest of the stuff. Are
Speaker 2: you seeing that kind of debanking and deplatforming in various places.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, sometimes we say that we get to uh
Speaker 3: too much of truth. YouTube will take us down for
Speaker 3: a while or something like that, and we'll come back
Speaker 3: on again. You know, we don't have that issue with banking, say,
Speaker 3: but they ignore us because they don't need an attention.
Speaker 3: We'll get attacked, you know, we start to grow, so
Speaker 3: they try to tell we don't exist any longer.
Speaker 2: That's when I first learned the John Birsch Society was
Speaker 2: when Williamouth Buckley, he was on a tear to come
Speaker 2: after Well, I agree with these guys and I with Buckley, So.
Speaker 3: He's a CFO. Remember, by the way, I'll think about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, probably as well, so sull.
Speaker 3: And Bones, you know from Yale. You know, I go on,
Speaker 3: he was a good guy, right yeah, you know his
Speaker 3: organization exists today. Don't look at them. Don't listen to
Speaker 3: those guys over there. Yeah yeah, okay, so.
Speaker 2: That's why he was. He was a good guy. That
Speaker 2: why MPR had him on that right Yeah, right.
Speaker 3: People go we wrote a book about that called The
Speaker 3: Pipe Piper of the Establishment. We wrote that book. Jack
Speaker 3: wi Mass, our past president, you may have known him
Speaker 3: he wrote the book about Buckley, and he was you know,
Speaker 3: he was all put together to make sure that he
Speaker 3: steers the conservative movement, their direction of the CFR, in
Speaker 3: which he was a member of the CFR. So you know,
Speaker 3: it's like, you know, as I said, it's not a
Speaker 3: matter who, it's all controlled, you know, and he was
Speaker 3: control opposition.
Speaker 2: He's a very poster child for that, isn't he controlled?
Speaker 3: Absolutely correct? And people still hold him up as he
Speaker 3: was some you know, super conservative he was.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I remember, you know, wrestling Ball really idolized him.
Speaker 2: I was like, you don't realize that this guy is that.
Speaker 2: That's kind of telling that anyway. It's a it really
Speaker 2: is a great organization and I really do appreciate what
Speaker 2: you guys do. And again, the the Quiet Ideology Reshaping
Speaker 2: Policy from London Parlor to DC Power. Is that a
Speaker 2: book or is that an article? Because that's how I
Speaker 2: found out about about it.
Speaker 3: It sounds like it sounds like the Fabian Freeway. That's
Speaker 3: what it sounds like. Okay, over, Yeah, but you know,
Speaker 3: the JBS has been around for a long time. We
Speaker 3: have area chapters. We educate people on the voting record
Speaker 3: of their representatives and so we try to encourage people
Speaker 3: to be active participants in the process. How do you
Speaker 3: change your representative, David is if you don't understand the
Speaker 3: constitution or at least go visit them, say why did
Speaker 3: you vote on constitutionally? So we have this thing called
Speaker 3: the scorecard we printed out every quarter and it talks
Speaker 3: about the voting record constitutionally. We picked them on Congress,
Speaker 3: you know, Senate as well as the House on where
Speaker 3: they are, so people know if they're voting constitution or not.
Speaker 3: And it's our personal responsibility as Americans to uphold Remember
Speaker 3: the regi representatives work for us and say hey, why
Speaker 3: are you voting this way? And would they have not?
Speaker 3: I mean representative called me and said, no one ever,
Speaker 3: very rarely calls me on the phone and talks about anything.
Speaker 3: And so we can't it's not you know, we can't
Speaker 3: sit back. And I said, and one day we have
Speaker 3: a handsome young conservative show up in Congress. It doesn't
Speaker 3: happen that way. Yeah, So, well, my biggest goal is
Speaker 3: to fight complacency in Americans. And life is too good
Speaker 3: and even though the economics today is hurting them, now
Speaker 3: they're listening, but life is too good and they have to,
Speaker 3: you know, we have to get behind and spend a
Speaker 3: little time protecting our sovereignty and our freedoms. But we
Speaker 3: have to know who we are first, and that's what
Speaker 3: we try to teach American as principles and hold up
Speaker 3: representatives who work for us to make sure that happens.
Speaker 2: I agree, yeah, And that's what I liked about the
Speaker 2: John Birse Society was the focus on local activism as well,
Speaker 2: and you know, knowing what is happening locally in your
Speaker 2: state as well. And I've seen what you're talking about
Speaker 2: in terms of representatives who say nobody ever calls me.
Speaker 2: I saw the power of that, and I've talked about
Speaker 2: this on the program. When I lived in North Carolina,
Speaker 2: I was involved with homeschooling, and at that point in time,
Speaker 2: all of North Carolina's government was Democrat Democrat House and
Speaker 2: Senate as well as the governor and all the rest
Speaker 2: of stuff. So they decided, the teachers unions decided that
Speaker 2: they were going to shut down homeschooling, and it looked
Speaker 2: like they were going to be able to do it
Speaker 2: because it was all Democrats and an active minority of
Speaker 2: homeschoolers which was really small at the time, there wasn't
Speaker 2: a lot of people homeschooling. There's so many more who
Speaker 2: were doing it today, but everybody got actively involved and
Speaker 2: started writing and it made them look so much bigger
Speaker 2: than they actually were, and it actually beat down the
Speaker 2: teachers unions in a Democrat state, they were going to
Speaker 2: try to regulate homeschooling out of existence. And so that
Speaker 2: was a very important first hand lesson to learn. But
Speaker 2: it's difficult to get people do that. And that's one
Speaker 2: of the things that John Bird Society does, I think
Speaker 2: is excellent, which is to educate each other about what
Speaker 2: is happening locally within your state and how you can
Speaker 2: take action at a local level. I remember my probably
Speaker 2: my earliest memory of the John Birsh Society was to
Speaker 2: support your local Sheriff stuff being concerned about the federalization
Speaker 2: of the police, and that is something that is now
Speaker 2: really escalating, isn't it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Yeah, we actually have we have that group, it
Speaker 3: still exists called support your Local Police. We want to
Speaker 3: keep them independent, have federalized. We have a group, we
Speaker 3: have an affiliate, not for profit called support your Local Police,
Speaker 3: and we also have a you mentioned school with the
Speaker 3: homeschool we've been in existing for fifteen years called the
Speaker 3: Freedom Project Academy. It goes from kindergarten high school. We
Speaker 3: have live you know, education of course online or you
Speaker 3: can buy recorded version of it, and that's been around.
Speaker 3: So we're educating all over the world. Adults are having
Speaker 3: their children signed up to learn really Americanism and who
Speaker 3: we are, not fabricated history. And we teach you how
Speaker 3: the kids how to write cursive and do math or
Speaker 3: read books. How about that for a change. And so
Speaker 3: we yeah, it hasn't happened in above U school, I
Speaker 3: can tell you that. And we spend more time in
Speaker 3: education than social emotional learning. But the thing is, and
Speaker 3: it goes you mentioned, Alison. We wrote a lot of
Speaker 3: books about that. But the thing is is that so
Speaker 3: we look at education where our children, our adults bring
Speaker 3: into view really who we are, what we're all about,
Speaker 3: because we've been indoctrinated. And we know that brainwashing has
Speaker 3: existed through all the mass media, David, all the mass
Speaker 3: medias you know very well because you're in the media business.
Speaker 3: That's all controlled by the Console and Foreign Relations. Every
Speaker 3: one of those New York Times, all the networks, including
Speaker 3: Fox is all controlled media, and they all say the
Speaker 3: same thing, same to the help. So guess what, that's
Speaker 3: the only thing you hear, that's the only thing you believe.
Speaker 3: So we said, no time out, let's talk about reality here.
Speaker 3: And it's hard for some people to swallow. But once
Speaker 3: you've been red pilled, all of a sudden, the world changes,
Speaker 3: like now we see what's going on here. So that's
Speaker 3: our job. On the Birch's side, we did with kids
Speaker 3: with school. You're right about the law enforce. We want
Speaker 3: to keep them independent. We teach the constitution. We get
Speaker 3: people involved. It's about education and get people activated and involved.
Speaker 3: That's really important.
Speaker 2: I absolutely agree, get.
Speaker 3: Activated and involved, and that's how we save our country
Speaker 3: as well as the people over in England. They see
Speaker 3: the problem now because they're watching their country be destroyed.
Speaker 3: And I mentioned the Fabians we first came on because
Speaker 3: that's coming to attractions for the United States, what you
Speaker 3: see in Europe as coming to attractions for here.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, just a little bit. Yeah, it's a warning,
Speaker 2: that's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so you know, getting back to the federalization of
Speaker 2: the police. You know, we lick at these things and
Speaker 2: we say, okay, even if you like the guy who's
Speaker 2: doing it. And even if you agree with the stated goal,
Speaker 2: you have to look at this and stay yeah, but
Speaker 2: that policy is going to establish a precedent of the
Speaker 2: federalization of law enforcement, and so I know where that leads, right,
Speaker 2: So we pull this back. Okay, So let's let's walk
Speaker 2: this back, and we have to oppose this even if
Speaker 2: we agree with the stated purpose. That's the wrong way
Speaker 2: to do it. And it is so important that we
Speaker 2: not sacrifice the that the the uh. You know that
Speaker 2: the means does not it's not just that the end
Speaker 2: is not just by the means. That's how these people
Speaker 2: always get us there. And it's understanding those principles and
Speaker 2: what America is about, understanding the Constitution and what that's about,
Speaker 2: and why those things are there. Uh, there's important safeguards
Speaker 2: against tyranny. And understand that if we wipe those things away,
Speaker 2: because it's going to make it more expedient for us
Speaker 2: to achieve this particular policy goal, we are going to
Speaker 2: pay the price along of them. Are we?
Speaker 3: A nationalized police force is one of Marx's Karl Marx's plan,
Speaker 3: and so that's where we're trying to avoid. Keep them
Speaker 3: local and independent. Your sheriff is a very important person
Speaker 3: in your county, very important person. And I always I
Speaker 3: encourage people to know who the sheriff is and talk
Speaker 3: to them and make sure that you understand and they
Speaker 3: understand about America's principles and our rights, and they have
Speaker 3: You have to know who the sheriff is, so they
Speaker 3: know who you are. Much like a legislators and state
Speaker 3: legens there, you know, go back to our basics of
Speaker 3: our country, our United States, where form is independent states,
Speaker 3: sovereign states. And over a period of time, David, that
Speaker 3: we've given the states have given power from themselves to
Speaker 3: the federal government. That's not the way it was supposed
Speaker 3: to operate. The government is supposed to defend use against
Speaker 3: public and domestic enemies, you know, and that's very limited powers.
Speaker 3: Look at our one secually of the Constitution, very limited powers.
Speaker 3: Congress has right and government. And so we have actually
Speaker 3: given more power to the federal government. Why it's all
Speaker 3: upside side and distorted today. So we spend time but
Speaker 3: local legislators in each state to make sure they uphold
Speaker 3: the constitutional responsibility. Each state has a constitution. The word
Speaker 3: democracy does not exist. It's always a Republic. That's all
Speaker 3: another thing we teach people. That word does not appear
Speaker 3: in our constitution or any state constitutions, and people don't
Speaker 3: even know that. And I said, you have to understand
Speaker 3: states are sovereign. Make sure you make this is where begins.
Speaker 3: So if you look at our history, it was done
Speaker 3: with that phenomenal idea that keep them sovereign, independent states.
Speaker 3: So those basic things I just sent to you. Most
Speaker 3: Americans I talked to do not understand that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they don't.
Speaker 3: Understand at all.
Speaker 2: That's right, Absolutely do not. And it's so important that
Speaker 2: we that we understand the foundation of principles and why
Speaker 2: these things were set up the way they were. Actually
Speaker 2: is a good plan, you know, even though the constitutionsly violated,
Speaker 2: it's still a good plan and we should try it
Speaker 2: someday in our lifetime.
Speaker 3: I think it's like the Ten Commandments, it's not the
Speaker 3: ten suggestions, you know.
Speaker 2: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 3: And they also have the Constitution. You have to know
Speaker 3: it before you get hold it, you know.
Speaker 2: And everybody pretty much, whether they local or state or
Speaker 2: especially federal, they take an oath to the Constitution as
Speaker 2: a requirement of their authority. And so when they violate
Speaker 2: that they no longer have a legitimate authority, but they
Speaker 2: do have a lot of power, and so we need
Speaker 2: to understand that we can have power collectively, and that's
Speaker 2: one of the things I think the John Birch Society
Speaker 2: does bring to the table. Thank you so much for
Speaker 2: joining us. It's been a fascinating discussion. Mister Morrow, Wayne Morrow,
Speaker 2: Thank you Wayne Morrow, the CEO of John Birch Society.
Speaker 2: Always great talking to you guys. We're going to a
Speaker 2: quick break folks, and we'll be right back on to
Speaker 2: talk a little bit about what's going on with cars
Speaker 2: here in just a second, so we'll be right back.
Speaker 15: Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show. You're listening to
Speaker 1: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
Speaker 4: access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
Speaker 4: classic hits to new. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 4: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 5: Welcome back, folks. We got a lot of comments and
Speaker 5: Jersey Boy thank you so much for the support. He says,
Speaker 5: can you please ask if he was ever heard of?
Speaker 5: William Cooper who wrote Behold a Pale Horse.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. I didn't see that comment at the time.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry.
Speaker 5: And does he know about Jimmy from Brooklyn, who JBS interviewed,
Speaker 5: who I'm trying to get on your show?
Speaker 2: Okay, well, god, I'm sorry I missed that. I'm very sorry.
Speaker 5: Yes, apologies. Oen sixty one, thank you so much for
Speaker 5: the support. He just says, thank.
Speaker 2: You, well, thank you, Owen appreciate it.
Speaker 5: Yes, thank you so much. And Jersey Boy again says,
Speaker 5: I remember a few years ago from JBS and email
Speaker 5: history of and I need to history of Republicans. It
Speaker 5: was started by a communist? Does he know what it was?
Speaker 5: And what does he think of JFK.
Speaker 2: You No, it's interesting. Book I really enjoyed was an
Speaker 2: alternative history book by Harry Turtledove. He's written a lot
Speaker 2: of alternative history books, and this one was about the
Speaker 2: Civil Wars called how Few Remain And in it, you know,
Speaker 2: you may know the history that Antietam as Buddy as
Speaker 2: a battle was nearly was could have been a victory
Speaker 2: for the South, except that one of the couriers dropped
Speaker 2: the orders that he was carrying and they fell into
Speaker 2: the Union's hands. And so in his book, guys say, hey,
Speaker 2: you dropped those orders, better pick those up. Can you
Speaker 2: imagine why would happened if the other guy's got that right?
Speaker 2: And so that causes an early end to the war,
Speaker 2: and pretty much all the major figures of both North
Speaker 2: and South survive, and the causes the early end of
Speaker 2: the war and the South to gain its independence. And
Speaker 2: in his alternative history, Lincoln is entirely discredited because he
Speaker 2: lost the war. But then he makes a comeback as
Speaker 2: this book is picking up a couple of decades on.
Speaker 2: At that point in time, I think he's got Stonewall
Speaker 2: Jackson as the President of the Confederacy, and Lincoln makes
Speaker 2: a political comeback as head of the Socialist Party. And
Speaker 2: that's one of the things that made that book so
Speaker 2: interesting was he really did understand these people, what motivated them,
Speaker 2: and the things behind them. And so, yeah, there was
Speaker 2: an early connection with that. And if you look at
Speaker 2: I always think about the Pledge of Allegiance that was
Speaker 2: put in by the Grand Army of the Republic. Most
Speaker 2: the veterans, especially if they were well known or successful,
Speaker 2: played an important part in the war. They got very
Speaker 2: big positions and the subsequent governments that were there, and
Speaker 2: the Grand Army of the Republic, which was the organization
Speaker 2: of Civil War veterans for the North, had a tremendous
Speaker 2: amount of influence. They were the ones who instituted the
Speaker 2: Pledge of Allegiance and it initially did not have under
Speaker 2: God in it until the mid nineteen fifties. And so
Speaker 2: the emphasis was on one nation indivisible and that you know,
Speaker 2: very harsh with that, and it was the pledge was
Speaker 2: done with one arms extended out, palmed down, just like
Speaker 2: the Nazi salute. They changed it to hand over your
Speaker 2: heart because of the Nazi salute. But yeah, socialism and
Speaker 2: a lot of other things that were there, and the
Speaker 2: as well as the concentration of power and really talking
Speaker 2: about the destruction of the states as sovereign entities and
Speaker 2: the understanding that the states had created the federal government.
Speaker 2: All that stuff disappeared with Civil War go ahead.
Speaker 5: We have username zero one, two, three, four, five, six,
Speaker 5: eight nine, AI will be kosher and Dei Nivoduru twenty
Speaker 5: twenty nine says we have the best government money can buy,
Speaker 5: and that's a quote from Mark Twain.
Speaker 2: And they spent.
Speaker 5: More and more every single day. Pazonovante seventeen seventy six
Speaker 5: ask the guest his take on war Gaza. Trump's anti
Speaker 5: semitisms are in the Heritage Foundation's projects.
Speaker 2: I apologize, I didn't see that.
Speaker 5: Yes, the conversation was too good, Goldsmith says, curiously, people
Speaker 5: often claim Marx was focused solely on economics, but his
Speaker 5: entire worldview was cultural, based on envy and hate.
Speaker 2: Yeah, conflict, Yeah, like go and dialectic. That's why, you know,
Speaker 2: we can we have to look at the different ways
Speaker 2: that they divide us. You know, it's very explicit what
Speaker 2: Bill ayers and burning door and whether whether men wanted
Speaker 2: to do they wouldn't have a race war. Marx focused
Speaker 2: the thing about economics was there, but that was really
Speaker 2: a class struggle, right, and the economics was a part
Speaker 2: of that class struggle. But it's always about dividing us.
Speaker 2: And that's why I said, you know, we to very
Speaker 2: careful about the Republican versus Democrat thing, any kind of
Speaker 2: division that they can use like that. And when we
Speaker 2: attach ourselves to a different ethnic group or different political group,
Speaker 2: these different types of things, those attachments draw us away
Speaker 2: from the principles that can be the bulwark against this
Speaker 2: kind of socialist hell that they want to put us in.
Speaker 5: And Mama c. Nineteen ninety six. Has I never learned
Speaker 5: so much is when I was homeschooling my kids.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right, that's excellent. And that was the
Speaker 2: thing that I really missed about it was that was
Speaker 2: where I put all my effort before I had the show.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, that was at one point
Speaker 2: it was kind of bothering me because I was filling
Speaker 2: in for Alex at the very beginning. He said, you know,
Speaker 2: there's gonna be millions of people listening to you. I said,
Speaker 2: don't tell me that I need to do that right now.
Speaker 2: But because I was not very much into public speaking
Speaker 2: or anything like that, and I said, no, the way
Speaker 2: I think of this, and that was in his original studio,
Speaker 2: which was really small and intimate, And so the way
Speaker 2: I think of this is I'm talking to the eyes
Speaker 2: over there running the board. I could see them, and
Speaker 2: I said, I'm just thinking, like I'm doing homeschooling with
Speaker 2: my kids. So I said, don't talk to me about
Speaker 2: millions of people listening to That'll freeze me up. So
Speaker 2: that's the way I always looked at it. And it
Speaker 2: was such a wonderful thing because it gave us an
Speaker 2: opportunity to go back and look at content that was
Speaker 2: compelled on us in the schools and to view it
Speaker 2: in a different way. And that's one of the things
Speaker 2: I've always said about biology and evolution. You know, when
Speaker 2: it's taught to us in the schools, it was always
Speaker 2: dumbed down into skeletons and death. Right for the evolutionist's
Speaker 2: death is the thing the engine of creation. For us,
Speaker 2: it is the giver of life. And we didn't look
Speaker 2: at comparative anatomy of skeletons. We looked at the unique
Speaker 2: design of each and every animal and that was the
Speaker 2: thing that was so fascinating. So it really is a
Speaker 2: blessing and an opportunity. I hope if you have the
Speaker 2: opportunity take that to homeschool your kids have a good day.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 6: You can take a photo on a phone, there is
Speaker 6: machine learning in the background.
Speaker 7: Highest quality video capture ever in a smartphone.
Speaker 6: In the metaverse, we're going to need AI that is
Speaker 6: build around helping people navigate virtual worlds as well as
Speaker 6: our physical world with augmented reality.
Speaker 7: Augmented reality is a profound technology that.
Speaker 6: Includes like your position in three D space, your your
Speaker 6: body language, facial gestures.
Speaker 7: We invented new intimate ways to connect and communicate directly from.
Speaker 6: Your rist, everything from virtual reality to designing our own
Speaker 6: data centers.
Speaker 8: Describing what's coming even it's just so different in you.
Speaker 8: I've been in this infrastructure business for three decades.
Speaker 6: No one has ever seen industry Yeah, and now I
Speaker 6: expect that these trends will only increase in the future.
Speaker 9: In the last few months, we launched voice and vision
Speaker 9: capabilities so that chat GPT can now see here and
Speaker 9: speak courts up to one hundred and twenty eight thousand
Speaker 9: tokens of contexts. That's three hundred pages of a standard book.
Speaker 6: That's all AI generated. Actually, let's add some alto cumulus fucks.
Speaker 2: All right, break free of the technocratic night mayor this
Speaker 2: Christmas and go back to basics, where the David Knight
Speaker 2: Show bookmark and notebook. This high quality and boss metal
Speaker 2: bookmark with a full color design on the back is
Speaker 2: guaranteed to be cross compatible with all physical books, and
Speaker 2: the beautiful Foe leather notebook is one hundred percent hacking proof.
Speaker 2: An ideal gift for fans of the David Knight Show,
Speaker 2: or anyone looking to start a journaling or prayer joeneral habit.
Speaker 2: No bells, no whistles, just pen and paper. Available at
Speaker 2: Davidknight dot News. Merry Christmas,