Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: The start of a.
Speaker 1: Glorious summer weekend across the Rocky So if you're listening
Speaker 1: to this show in Colorado, A, you're lucky, and B
Speaker 1: you're going to have great weather this weekend.
Speaker 2: There may be some.
Speaker 1: Pockets of exception across the state, but most of Colorado
Speaker 1: is going to have warm and dry and not smoking warm,
Speaker 1: not broiling warm, you know, just like upper eighties, low nineties,
Speaker 1: kind of warm and dry. So let's favor at three
Speaker 1: h three someone three eight two five five the number
Speaker 1: text d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 2: A little hot in the White House, I guess earlier
Speaker 2: this week.
Speaker 1: At this point doesn't seem to be in dispute that
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino may be resigning hasn't yet.
Speaker 2: We'll see if that happened, but it appears.
Speaker 1: The President is likely to be lining up behind Pambondi
Speaker 1: and Kosh Pttel as well, who both signed on to
Speaker 1: closing the Epstein matter at this point.
Speaker 2: So where do you want to see all that go? Three?
Speaker 1: All three seven one three A two five five the
Speaker 1: number text d A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: We've got that on the plate and so much more today.
Speaker 1: I mean, Jeeves, where do you want to start with
Speaker 1: all of this? You know, one of the things I'll
Speaker 1: touch on briefly because I think it's part of a
Speaker 1: really important broader point, is you know, this this violent
Speaker 1: effort now to stop ICE from cracking down on this
Speaker 1: marijuana farm in California where they've got all these young
Speaker 1: kids working there, and it just and I don't mean
Speaker 1: to sound naive, but it just comes back to as
Speaker 1: a guy used to be a Democrat, I cannot even
Speaker 1: fathom the fact that it is a fact, in my
Speaker 1: view that the people who control the Democratic Party at
Speaker 1: this point, the vast majority of just don't care about kids.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about your typical Democrat, like the one
Speaker 1: I sleep with and have for going on well just
Speaker 1: past thirty one years now.
Speaker 2: It just had our anniversary.
Speaker 1: But I'm talking about the far left, secular wackos who
Speaker 1: control the party. They just don't care about kids. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're perfectly happy having all these children as a quote
Speaker 1: acceptable casualty rate. That's the way I believe they view them,
Speaker 1: whether they're all these kids who are being just I
Speaker 1: mean it's straight out of hell right trafficked as they
Speaker 1: come up over the border, and all the sexual abuse
Speaker 1: and all the essentially slavery, whether it's sexual slavery or
Speaker 1: other kinds of slavery like you see on this marijuana
Speaker 1: farm in California. But the left and power just doesn't care.
Speaker 1: They view so many humans as an acceptable casualty rating.
Speaker 1: I believe that's an extension of and possibly a result
Speaker 1: of this bizarre slavish commitment to the mass killing of
Speaker 1: the unborn before birth. That's become kind of the pillar
Speaker 1: and unifier in the Democratic Party. And once you just
Speaker 1: decide that, you know, these million plus kids a year
Speaker 1: lives don't matter, well then yeah, if you're that the
Speaker 1: secular left running the Democratic Party, then in that twisted worldview,
Speaker 1: why would these other kids matter? I mean, what's the
Speaker 1: difference between these kids there they're willing to see die
Speaker 1: other than location right between before birth and after birth.
Speaker 2: So it's a real it's a real kind of death cult.
Speaker 1: Death you know, this this attitude where innocent death just
Speaker 1: doesn't matter as long as the bigger state cause is served. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's sick, dangerous stuff. Three or three seven to one,
Speaker 1: three eight, two five five chime in anytime, d an
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine. As you can see, we're
Speaker 1: keeping it light on this glorious summer Friday afternoon. We
Speaker 1: do have some lighter topics. We just haven't thought them
Speaker 1: up yet, but we'll get to them eventually. I do
Speaker 1: want to get to some Marco Rubio stuff because as
Speaker 1: we're talking about the White House and what's going on
Speaker 1: in their internal battles, et cetera, I think it's just
Speaker 1: worth a quick note that, you know, twenty eight is
Speaker 1: obviously on right now, and I think it's I think
Speaker 1: it's so cool because then I'm an optimist by nature,
Speaker 1: right and I'm the guy who's been on air for
Speaker 1: years telling you, hey.
Speaker 2: Don't sweat it.
Speaker 1: You know, Trump's going to win and Biden is not
Speaker 1: going to be their candidate and it's going to be
Speaker 1: a mess, and Trump's going to win, and my optimism
Speaker 1: just keeps growing. And as we now are, my goodness,
Speaker 1: just on the verge of the one year anniversary, of
Speaker 1: the miracle in Butler, I do want to have a
Speaker 1: deeper dive conversation over.
Speaker 2: What do you think now? What do you think?
Speaker 1: I know we talked about it at the time, and
Speaker 1: I said right away, my view is that this was
Speaker 1: divine intervention, as we've seen throughout American history at critical
Speaker 1: pivotal watershed moments in our history, and as the founder
Speaker 1: is believed in. Right, you don't have to guess they
Speaker 1: wrote it. They wrote it in the Declaration of Independence. Hey,
Speaker 1: we're making this big bet because we're betting, you know
Speaker 1: that God is going to help us because of a
Speaker 1: We're all going to be hanging from trees. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what they said in the Declaration. They chose a
Speaker 1: few different words, but that's what they said. So, now
Speaker 1: that you've had a chance to see everything that's happened
Speaker 1: in this past year since the assassin, whether the assassin
Speaker 1: was sent by Iran or whether the assassin was this
Speaker 1: lone wolf for whatever, what do you think you think
Speaker 1: it was divine intervention?
Speaker 2: And if you believe that, what do you think it
Speaker 2: means for the future of America in the world? And
Speaker 2: then what do you think the world would look like?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: Now if that miracle had not happened, and we all
Speaker 1: know by now right, it's no longer disputed. There never
Speaker 1: was any legitimate dispute, but it's no longer disputed. If
Speaker 1: Trump hadn't turned his head at just that precise instant.
Speaker 2: He's dead.
Speaker 1: He's dead. And what does America? What does the world
Speaker 1: look like right now? If that assassin and whoever was
Speaker 1: behind that assassin had succeeded.
Speaker 2: All right, we got a lot to do.
Speaker 1: I did promo for today, and I will get into
Speaker 1: it won't take long, but it's important, this business of Okay,
Speaker 1: now that the US Supreme Court is very properly and
Speaker 1: great for the Republic, across party line said no, No,
Speaker 1: We've got an elected president, elected by the whole people.
Speaker 1: And the way the law works is individual district court judges,
Speaker 1: except in rare circumstances, can't block the president nationwide. So now,
Speaker 1: as we all expected, the left is turning to class
Speaker 1: action lawsuits, you know, to try to block the president nationwide.
Speaker 1: And I know you're probably driving right now. I don't
Speaker 1: want to make your eyes glaze over, so I won't
Speaker 1: get deep, deep, deep into Rule twenty three in class
Speaker 1: action lawsuit law, which truly, you could go to law
Speaker 1: school for three years and spend every day all three
Speaker 1: years studying class action law and still not cover everything.
Speaker 2: It is that complex. But that's the point.
Speaker 1: That's the point is it's not going to be that
Speaker 1: easy now for the left to just turn to class
Speaker 1: action lawsuits because unlike say, going into a particular district
Speaker 1: court and filing a lawsuit on behalf of an individual
Speaker 1: person slash plaintiff and claiming the president was doing something unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: Now you've got to get a whole class certified. And
Speaker 1: if you can get a whole class properly underlying that
Speaker 1: words certified, well then yeah, then then the court under
Speaker 1: the recent US Supreme Court ruling, then the court would
Speaker 1: have jurisdiction, you know, to do things that would have
Speaker 1: nationwide effect, because presumably you'd have members of your class
Speaker 1: all over the country.
Speaker 2: But getting a class certified is not easy. I have
Speaker 2: done it. It is not.
Speaker 1: Easy, and there are an awful lot of steps you
Speaker 1: have to go through. Now I'm sure you're thinking as
Speaker 1: you're driving home, you're thinking, well, okay, but you know
Speaker 1: what if a judge doesn't hold their feet to the
Speaker 1: fire and really require the people pushing this class to
Speaker 1: satisfy all the requirements, and then at that point you
Speaker 1: know you've got you can bet everything you've got. The
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court is going to see through any farce,
Speaker 1: and when brought the correct case, is going to put
Speaker 1: the hammer down and say, no, it's a farce. That's
Speaker 1: a farce that that's just meant to get around our
Speaker 1: ruling saying no nationwide injunctions. Now, on the other hand,
Speaker 1: you could end up with some legitimate nationwide class actions
Speaker 1: which then have the same effect. It's just gonna be
Speaker 1: a lot harder to pull that together. I'll give you
Speaker 1: one quick example. And on this birthright citizenship issue, I'm
Speaker 1: sure you've seen the headlines say, hey, nationwide class action.
Speaker 1: You know Judges has now certified it in that case,
Speaker 1: and the reason I think it's very ripe for appeal
Speaker 1: first to you know, the federal court appellate level called
Speaker 1: the circuit and then probably rocket docketed to the US
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. For a class action to be properly certified,
Speaker 1: you normally have to have what's called this typicality of harm,
Speaker 1: meaning you have to have kind of the same kind
Speaker 1: of harm, not precisely, but generally through the class of
Speaker 1: folks that you've been certified to represent. You've got to
Speaker 1: have the same kind of claim that applies to everybody.
Speaker 1: And just look at within the issue of immigration and
Speaker 1: birthright citizenship, there are so many differences between the circumstances
Speaker 1: of the plaintiffs. Like, you're going to have plaintiffs who
Speaker 1: are here illegally, you know, when they had children. You're
Speaker 1: going to have, you know, all of these different surrounding
Speaker 1: circumstances for so many different members of the class. And
Speaker 1: that's what's going to make it, I think, much much
Speaker 1: harder to keep a class like that together through various
Speaker 1: levels of appeal. So it didn't mean to take you
Speaker 1: into the woods trying to short circuit it, but that's
Speaker 1: the gist of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you will have some legitimate.
Speaker 1: Nationwide classes, but it's going to be a lot harder
Speaker 1: and a lot more time consuming than just going in
Speaker 1: and getting a nationwide injunction from an individual judge for
Speaker 1: an individual playoff. All right, let's come back play some
Speaker 1: really compelling sound from Mark Rubio as well.
Speaker 2: See if you agree with him on this question.
Speaker 1: Favorite Wait a second, you're Catholic and the administration position
Speaker 1: on immigration. Isn't that at odds with Catholic teaching. You're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Capitla Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 5: Democrats are taking They don't want President Corn to be successful.
Speaker 5: I got news for him. We are being successful. Every
Speaker 5: every illegal alien, public safety threat we arrest makes us
Speaker 5: cutry safer. Every national security threat we take off the
Speaker 5: street and deport makes us safer. And we're we're rescuing
Speaker 5: thousands of children. The lives saved every day by Ice,
Speaker 5: the live saved every day by Borg show and are in.
Speaker 1: The hundreds so into that, including on this marijuana farm
Speaker 1: where they rescued a bunch of children who were essentially
Speaker 1: serving as as underage slave labor. There this marijuana farm
Speaker 1: in California that's become the latest cause celeb for the
Speaker 1: left right trying to interfere with ICE, et cetera, turning
Speaker 1: violent three or three seven, one three eight two five
Speaker 1: five the number a Texter to da ed and five
Speaker 1: seven seven three nine. Ask the penetrating question, Dan, So
Speaker 1: it's bad if kids are found at a winery too right?
Speaker 2: Question Mark?
Speaker 1: Well, sure you should you shouldn't have kids working underage anywhere.
Speaker 1: Now we start with that, and then you go to Okay,
Speaker 1: some situations are more dangerous than others, there's no question
Speaker 1: about that. And the implicit underlying argument here will it, Oh,
Speaker 1: you know, marijuana.
Speaker 2: Alcohol equally bad.
Speaker 1: You know, that's just where the pro drug people go
Speaker 1: to hide, because they can't justify legalized marijuana on its
Speaker 1: own and all the harms that come from it. They
Speaker 1: just run to hide immediately. They scurry like mice behind
Speaker 1: behind mom's skirt and mom's skirt.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: The argument they've learned from big marijuana.
Speaker 1: Which is in many cases just blood money, right, all
Speaker 1: the carnage out there and ruined kids and everything else,
Speaker 1: why these so called legal drug dealers get rich. You
Speaker 1: know that the argument is all, oh, well, what about alcohol? No, hey,
Speaker 1: defend legalized marijuana, just just try to do it on
Speaker 1: its own merits. And this text has no interest in
Speaker 1: trying to defend all these underage kids, you know, working
Speaker 1: in the hot sun on this marijuana farm in California,
Speaker 1: kids who happened to be here illegally, by the way.
Speaker 1: He has no interest in trying to defend that because
Speaker 1: he can't, so he flees to the comfort of alcohol. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that tells you everything you need to know, right three
Speaker 1: out three seven one three eight two five five The
Speaker 1: number techs DA N five seven seven three nine on
Speaker 1: the underlying merits all of that conversation any day of
Speaker 1: the week. And that is, first of all, we have
Speaker 1: legalized alcohol in this country. That's not going away. That's
Speaker 1: the reality. And and but we do not have to
Speaker 1: be stuck with legalized marijuana that can go away. And
Speaker 1: the push for it nationwide has really slowed down as
Speaker 1: the truth about all the carnage has has started to
Speaker 1: come out seep out right because so often it's hard
Speaker 1: to find it in the which hopes to get rich off.
Speaker 2: Of the money from legalized marijuana. But yeah, so we
Speaker 2: got a choice here.
Speaker 1: We no longer have a choice unlegalized alcohol, which by
Speaker 1: the way, I would vote to keep legal, But we
Speaker 1: do have a choice when it comes to legalized marijuana,
Speaker 1: and there are some important differences. I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: minimize the harm from alcohol. I just walked from my
Speaker 1: office right now looking at horrific, horrific images of people
Speaker 1: killed by a drunk driver.
Speaker 2: You know, I've been.
Speaker 1: Representing people in civil cases where drunk drivers murder for
Speaker 1: a long long time. So I'm not trying to minimize
Speaker 1: that at all. I'm just saying there are some pretty
Speaker 1: significant differences, such as, you know, people can drink for
Speaker 1: something other than to get high, and the.
Speaker 2: Vast majority, and there's no moral judgment here.
Speaker 1: I don't think less of any all who uses marijuana,
Speaker 1: not at all. That's not a moral issue for me.
Speaker 1: The moral issue for me is deciding on a legalization
Speaker 1: framework where you know going to ruin a lot of kids,
Speaker 1: where you know you are undermining the entire youth population
Speaker 1: in this state. You know you are dramatically spiking teen suicides,
Speaker 1: you know you're going to cause a lot of carnage
Speaker 1: on the roadways. That's what I have a moral issue with,
Speaker 1: not whether some adult wants to get high in their home.
Speaker 1: Three out three someone three eight, two, five, five, the
Speaker 1: number ryan is it? And I have not imbibed with marijuana.
Speaker 1: But what I hear and see and I'm told by
Speaker 1: experts and users and everything else is when people sit
Speaker 1: down to consume THHC. And even in the old Chichenshong
Speaker 1: two to four percent leaf days, they sit down to
Speaker 1: get high. But now, of course the marijuana industry. It's
Speaker 1: all about hook them young, hook them forever, and they
Speaker 1: hook everybody right, so they crank the potency up eighty
Speaker 1: ninety percent. Yeah, now people sit down to consume marijuana,
Speaker 1: they're sitting down to get high. Am I wrong, my friend?
Speaker 2: And I am not claiming you are an expert.
Speaker 7: Right to me on that one, But no, no, I fig
Speaker 7: you're exactly right on this false equivalence that a lot
Speaker 7: of people that are pro weed are making, Like, well,
Speaker 7: what about alcohol, And like you said, very well, it's
Speaker 7: where they go to hide, you know, it doesn't you know,
Speaker 7: erase the argument whatsoever.
Speaker 2: And I don't even understand that comparison.
Speaker 7: You have six seven eight year olds that are the
Speaker 7: children of illegal aliens working at an illegal marijuana farm.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's kind of a problem.
Speaker 1: And it just goes back to the fact the Left
Speaker 1: doesn't care at all about illegal immigrants as humans. That
Speaker 1: the Left is perfectly willing to have hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of kids, kids lost to sex trafficking, other kinds of slavery, abuse,
Speaker 1: et cetera, hundreds of thousands. The Left doesn't care, and
Speaker 1: that's what happened under Biden. They don't care about those kids,
Speaker 1: and they showed in so many different ways, including this
Speaker 1: California marijuana farm. Tony in Inglewood, Colorado, You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kapslas Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Dan, I'm not a lawyer, but I play one
Speaker 3: on TV, so did I I'm curious this class action
Speaker 3: ruling by the judge.
Speaker 2: I believe that his language said.
Speaker 3: Something to the effect of all persons born and unborn.
Speaker 2: Do you know if that's.
Speaker 8: True or not.
Speaker 2: I'll check that during the break, Tony, Yeah, I'll check
Speaker 2: that during the break. That would be fascinating if that's true.
Speaker 2: If that's true, didn't he in a way open a.
Speaker 3: Can of worms giving human rights to the unborn?
Speaker 1: Very perceptive on your part, But no, And I'll give
Speaker 1: you a perfect example which just conclusively proves that abortions
Speaker 1: the taking of an innocent human life. The law has
Speaker 1: recognized that, and everybody knows it, and the left just
Speaker 1: doesn't care. It's it's willing to just kill innocent life.
Speaker 1: Here it is California. In California, it's capital murder, subjects
Speaker 1: you to the death pat if you kill an unborn child.
Speaker 1: If you kill an unborn child, I'll double check the law.
Speaker 1: I believe it's past seven weeks, and so that just
Speaker 1: proves it right, because that law couldn't have lasted a
Speaker 1: day unless it was medically true. The law would have
Speaker 1: been struck down as unconstitutional. But in California, the same
Speaker 1: baby that can be killed legally, I put it in
Speaker 1: quotes by an abortionist up till the moment of delivery.
Speaker 1: If somebody else kills that child, say in the commission
Speaker 1: of an assault on the mother, you know, when the mother,
Speaker 1: let's say, is two months pregnant, that's capital murder. Ask
Speaker 1: Scott Peterson about that. Yeah, so your point is well taken,
Speaker 1: my friend, very well taken. It's interesting round, we don't
Speaker 1: hear that that California point made in every single discussion
Speaker 1: on abortion. Wait a second, in California for years. You know,
Speaker 1: if I remember correctly, and I'm a big fan of
Speaker 1: Trail Davis, I have nothing but very positive things to
Speaker 1: say about Trail Davis.
Speaker 2: But if I remember correctly, I think it.
Speaker 1: Was to Terrell Davis's brother, because Terrell Davis overcame that
Speaker 1: the great Ronco running back overcame some really challenging circumstances
Speaker 1: growing up, and even more reason to admire what he
Speaker 1: accomplished and the many became But his brother, if I
Speaker 1: remember the facts, right, had been had been I believe,
Speaker 1: convicted of during a botched robbery attempt, maybe outside a
Speaker 1: post office, maybe hitting a woman in the stomach, didn't
Speaker 1: even know she was pregnant, causing the death of her
Speaker 1: unborn child, and he faced the murder charge for that.
Speaker 1: I believe that was that the seminole case in California.
Speaker 1: I'll double check on that. But that tells everything you
Speaker 1: need to know about the reality, the factual legal reality
Speaker 1: of abortion.
Speaker 2: It's the killing of innocent human life. You're on the
Speaker 2: Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 9: Something that you should have that you haven't reported. As
Speaker 9: you know, three hundred thousand children are missing, right, three
Speaker 9: hundred thousand. Under Biden, we've already gotten back ten thousand
Speaker 9: of those children, and we have a lot more plan.
Speaker 3: To come back.
Speaker 9: We're getting it back by the thousands for three hundred thousand,
Speaker 9: and we've as of this morning, over ten thousand we've
Speaker 9: gotten back.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So revealing that the left doesn't care at all
Speaker 1: about those children, right, just doesn't care about illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: as humans in general, and it's proven in so many ways.
Speaker 2: If you just joined us, thank you.
Speaker 1: We're spinning off of the Big Ice raid on the
Speaker 1: marijuana farm in California where they found a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of kids, very young kids to like eight ninety ten,
Speaker 1: where some of them you know, essentially working as slave
Speaker 1: labor there or working obviously illegally in in a very
Speaker 1: harmful environment for them.
Speaker 2: But life doesn't care about that. Robert in Denver, you're
Speaker 2: on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome.
Speaker 8: Oh, yes, I know you live. During the pandemic, he
Speaker 8: had John MacArthur, the pastor of Great Community Church in California.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm trying to remember. Did I have him on?
Speaker 8: Yes, he's the guy who would not go into lockdown
Speaker 8: and said the church had the right to have the
Speaker 8: church under the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm familiar with him, of course, the pastor. I'm
Speaker 1: familiar with that story. I just didn't remember having him on,
Speaker 1: But a lots happened since then.
Speaker 2: Go ahead, my friend, Yeah.
Speaker 8: I remember you had him on twice. Wow. Anyway, he's
Speaker 8: the pastor of that church as fourteen thousand members and
Speaker 8: gig one that was taken to the Supreme court in
Speaker 8: any case, he has a new video out on YouTube
Speaker 8: called God's Pathetic Warning about Trump willstunned everyone, and he's
Speaker 8: very critical of people who go along with Trump being
Speaker 8: something that Christians should compromise their protests about because so
Speaker 8: much of his behavior is out of line with anything
Speaker 8: that's Christian, and that if there was somebody on the
Speaker 8: other side of the political aisle, they would be outraged.
Speaker 1: And I haven't seen it, but can you give us
Speaker 1: a little more information about the reasoning and the thinking?
Speaker 1: Here is the point that this could not have been
Speaker 1: divine interventions saving Trump in that Butler field.
Speaker 8: Oh no, I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is
Speaker 8: his point is God uses people, like you know, King
Speaker 8: Saul in the Bible, even though he really didn't want
Speaker 8: Israel to have a king, and then he used an
Speaker 8: Avacan hazard. He uses a lot of people. Just because
Speaker 8: he uses someone does not mean that somebody should say
Speaker 8: that Christians should support him without being without question, because
Speaker 8: so many times today we are seeing Christians mute their
Speaker 8: criticism and saying, well, he's doing so much good. I'm
Speaker 8: not going to say anything, or I'm not going to
Speaker 8: say hardly anything.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 8: And he says, that's that's not right.
Speaker 1: Okay, interesting, Yeah, I'll try to pick that up.
Speaker 6: To me.
Speaker 1: It's always, you know, the rubber meets the road with
Speaker 1: the vote, and in terms of saying stuff, listen, I
Speaker 1: think we've probably been the most fair imbalanced to Trump
Speaker 1: of anybody. When he deserves criticism, he gets it. When
Speaker 1: he deserves praise, he gets it, and so many outlets
Speaker 1: won't give him praise when he deserves it. But listening,
Speaker 1: in the end, I can tell you what I base
Speaker 1: my vote on is the morality of the public policy
Speaker 1: that he's going to pursue, rather than what any particular
Speaker 1: candidate's personal morality, maybe with some limits, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: if a candidate was actually a murderer or a rapist
Speaker 1: or an abuser of women or something like that, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't vote for him, no matter how good their policies were.
Speaker 1: But I'm looking at the morality of their policies.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, he of course got into trouble because
Speaker 8: of as Daniels there in New York.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I don't think, and I think everybody's going
Speaker 1: to turn both of us off if we start talking
Speaker 1: about Stormy Daniels. But in America spoke loud and clear
Speaker 1: on this right, electing President Trump just week after the
Speaker 1: Hollywood Access.
Speaker 2: Takes, and.
Speaker 8: I voted plane choice.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: But the fact is, you know, like he said he
Speaker 8: was going to end or in Ukraine several times, and
Speaker 8: before he was inaugurated, he said he was going to
Speaker 8: bring inflation down. You know, according to Keplinger and Kelly Books,
Speaker 8: Frubook and several others, car prices because of it, there
Speaker 8: is wanting to go out. But by the fifteen thousand.
Speaker 2: Dollars, well, big fella.
Speaker 1: In terms of Ukraine, he's been working very hard to
Speaker 1: do that. He obviously has been forging peace throughout the
Speaker 1: Middle East, sometimes through strength and sometimes through the threat
Speaker 1: of strength. You're going to sit here and dogham because
Speaker 1: Russia the Ukraine isn't settled yet just half a year
Speaker 1: into his term. I mean, I don't think that's fair
Speaker 1: at all. And when it comes to a Christian and
Speaker 1: Christian obligation, everybody has to decide for themselves.
Speaker 2: And you know, my view of it is, I.
Speaker 1: Didn't betray my Christian faith by voting for Trump. I
Speaker 1: would have betrayed my Christian faith by voting for his opponent.
Speaker 8: I'm sure you're right, because John MacArthur says the same thing.
Speaker 8: You shouldn't withdraw from the political activism just because you
Speaker 8: don't follow him. I'm critically, but the fact is he
Speaker 8: may be being used, but at the same time God
Speaker 8: may not be policed with the things that he's doing.
Speaker 1: You know, King David, I mean, the greatest figures in history.
Speaker 1: I mean, and thank you for the call man, But
Speaker 1: and I don't claim to be, you know, the the
Speaker 1: theologian biblical scholar out there. I try, I try to understand.
Speaker 1: I read or listen to something every day, but I
Speaker 1: don't claim to be any kind of scholar, just a
Speaker 1: guy trying to figure it out. But even I can see.
Speaker 1: You know, God's whole thing has been using broken people, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, when he went out for his disciples, you know,
Speaker 1: he wasn't going to the rich people, he wasn't going
Speaker 1: to the fancy people. You know, He's going out to
Speaker 1: the fishermen and everything else. Everybody knows three at three
Speaker 1: seven three eight two five five tagst d A N
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine. That's always been one of
Speaker 1: the things that's given me great hope is that God
Speaker 1: has an affinity right for broken people, as long as
Speaker 1: you want to get it right. Dan, if a person
Speaker 1: comes to the United States legally and as a legal immigrant,
Speaker 1: does having a baby in the United States as a
Speaker 1: US citizen changed.
Speaker 2: Because of this new law? No? No, it does not.
Speaker 1: And uh, Dan, what's the difference between wacko left and
Speaker 1: by the way, the texture was referring by new law
Speaker 1: to this class action lawsuit that's now been certified and
Speaker 1: is being used by the left as a way to
Speaker 1: get around the Supreme Court limit on nationwide injunctions by
Speaker 1: district court judges. Dan, what's the difference between wacko leftist
Speaker 1: Dems and the kind of damn you sleep with? If
Speaker 1: they both vote Democrat? What a penetrating question that is?
Speaker 1: I think the big difference is what they believe in
Speaker 1: and what they're committed to and what they want to
Speaker 1: see happen. So let's take, for example, the Democrat. If
Speaker 1: she hasn't become unaffiliated, I'm going to ask her tonight
Speaker 1: that I've had the pleasure of sleeping with for thirty
Speaker 1: one plus years now, and she breaks with the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party on occasion to support Republicans. She has if you
Speaker 1: sat down with my wife and you talked about the
Speaker 1: things she cares about, the policy she wants to see
Speaker 1: and acted, etc. You'd probably agree with her on probably
Speaker 1: eighty to ninety percent. Now if you're like me, so, no,
Speaker 1: she's not a prisoner of any political party. And this
Speaker 1: next statement, I'm not applying to my wife, you know,
Speaker 1: but I will say it applies to Democrats more broadly
Speaker 1: because I was one for years, and the vast majority
Speaker 1: of my family outside of Colorado, like one hundred is Democrat.
Speaker 1: We got to understand that they're an awful lot of
Speaker 1: people whose view of Republicans. The stereotype is so negative.
Speaker 1: It's not like they're voting Democrat because they're really excited
Speaker 1: about that. They could just never imagine voting Republican. That
Speaker 1: obviously doesn't apply to my wife, A. She has voted
Speaker 1: for Republicans, she has worked for some Republicans, and she
Speaker 1: knows many people through me who are Republican and she
Speaker 1: loves them. But we got to be realistic. There are
Speaker 1: so many people out there. They don't just go dancing
Speaker 1: joyfully into the voting booth to vote for Democrats. They
Speaker 1: just could never imagine voting for Republicans. It's on us
Speaker 1: to change that. You're on the Dan Caplis.
Speaker 4: Show and now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 2: It's co O Obama sayah, praierfleur.
Speaker 6: Women, we have so many landmines and barriers and don't
Speaker 6: send limitations. It's you know, I mean, Craig, you're the
Speaker 6: guy at the table. But I think it's important for
Speaker 6: all guys listening, especially men raising daughters, to realize that
Speaker 6: that that difference.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama must be a very happy man. Or quite
Speaker 2: the contrary that.
Speaker 7: It was from Clay and Buck that they were referencing
Speaker 7: this clip, and it was Clay Travis that was saying,
Speaker 7: he's actually feel sorry for Barack Obama, that she must
Speaker 7: be absolutely miserable to live with.
Speaker 2: All she does is complain. Listen, listen one of.
Speaker 7: The people, Dan, I know you love her. I don't
Speaker 7: know why, but she's terrible. Why would you say this
Speaker 7: because you always you're sending me these clips, because.
Speaker 1: Because I'm intellectually honest. The only point I make about her,
Speaker 1: the only point I make about her is wait a second,
Speaker 1: she would be this strongest candidate the Democrats have.
Speaker 7: I believe that lesson less with every word she utters
Speaker 7: she Well.
Speaker 2: You're right.
Speaker 1: I do think it's fair to say developments over the
Speaker 1: last since election date, right, Yeah, I think at that
Speaker 1: point her star has dimmed. But listen, she's Oh I
Speaker 1: was going to use a politically incorrect phrase, she's still
Speaker 1: the tallest among the short, right, I mean she's still
Speaker 1: she has undeniable You can say it if you want to.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it. She still has undeniable intellect. She
Speaker 1: was gifted. So many people have been gifted with a
Speaker 1: strong intellect. I'm just talking about the physical. You know,
Speaker 1: the mental capacity, then don't use it to do good things.
Speaker 1: But but she has a strong intellect. She was gifted
Speaker 1: with health, she was gifted with looks, she was gifted
Speaker 1: with great parents, with a lot of opportunity, now gifted
Speaker 1: with great wealth. Has led a very pampered life, at
Speaker 1: least later in her young life. And so I'm just
Speaker 1: recognizing that among let's say that the dull knives.
Speaker 2: In the Democrat drawer.
Speaker 1: Okay, she is by far the sharpest, she is intellectually talented,
Speaker 1: she has these other attributes. I think she'd be the
Speaker 1: best that they have.
Speaker 7: I think she is so out of touch and completely
Speaker 7: detached from any relatable reality that the average Let's say,
Speaker 7: like you, Dan, you're a south Sider.
Speaker 2: She claims to be that too.
Speaker 7: I believe she is so far away from that existence,
Speaker 7: from that life. And the thing she complains about, yeah,
Speaker 7: is she has Secret Service protection for the rest of
Speaker 7: her life, Like you said, a pampered existence that's not
Speaker 7: relatable to a South Sider who has to go through
Speaker 7: the daily grind, who has to compete with illegal aliens
Speaker 7: for jobs.
Speaker 1: Here's the difference. I think she's no longer blue collar. No, okay,
Speaker 1: I am blue collar now. I mean just as a
Speaker 1: person to my core, and I understand I've been blessed
Speaker 1: with opportunity and a lot of help along the way
Speaker 1: from a lot of good people, and our.
Speaker 2: Business has been blessed with success, and I.
Speaker 1: Make a good living. I get all of that. But
Speaker 1: I know myself and to my core, I am blue collar.
Speaker 1: She obviously has gone a different direction, and a lot
Speaker 1: of that comes back to what level of respect do
Speaker 1: you have for people, you know, for working people. But anyway,
Speaker 1: now I'm getting into policy stuff. Here's my bigger point.
Speaker 1: What I try to take from that is, you know,
Speaker 1: I just tried it. I try to look at myself right,
Speaker 1: because we were always raised I've told you, my mom
Speaker 1: always told us, first thing, when you wake up in
Speaker 1: the morning, think of the five things you're grateful for,
Speaker 1: and think of the five things you're looking forward to
Speaker 1: that day. So that's how we would first thing in
Speaker 1: the morning. And I think that certainly looking at myself.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 2: I can always be more grateful.
Speaker 1: And you look at Michelle Obama and you listen to
Speaker 1: that tape, and you're not hearing a grateful person, right.
Speaker 2: So I listen to that and I think two things.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama must be playing a lot of golf, and
Speaker 1: I need to do a better job of being grateful
Speaker 1: for my full time occupation could be being grateful because
Speaker 1: I have so much to be grateful for, and I
Speaker 1: am grateful. I'm just saying that, you know how there's
Speaker 1: like low burn gratitude, you know, kind of remember the
Speaker 1: old gas stoves. I think kick and luper and polus
Speaker 1: about loud those now, but but you know kind of
Speaker 1: low burn gratitude that's always there and then it flames up.
Speaker 1: I'm just thinking that we'd all be speaking for myself,
Speaker 1: we'd all be a whole lot happier if kind of
Speaker 1: like a primary focus was turn that burner all the
Speaker 1: way up, because lord knows, just being born in America, right,
Speaker 1: I mean literally, we're all lottery winners just being born here.
Speaker 1: And then hey, you're talking about Michelle Obama. We were
Speaker 1: both born into the wealthiest families in Chicago because of
Speaker 1: the love and family structure and support.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Man, Oh, let's hear some more of that. That sure,
Speaker 1: And you know how I talk about her all the time,
Speaker 1: how I appreciate my wife in a million different ways.
Speaker 1: But after this clip, I'm gonna run home and sweep
Speaker 1: her off her feet.
Speaker 6: That thing that inadvertently as you were loving and raising
Speaker 6: these beautiful girls, there are so many rules, make them
Speaker 6: make us small.
Speaker 2: I can't wait to get home tonight.
Speaker 1: My wife's gonna think I've been drinking my goodness, rush in,
Speaker 1: pick her up, big kiss.
Speaker 2: She deserves it. Oh she does, Thank you, thank you.
Speaker 2: Why you're not Michelle.
Speaker 7: I think all the men with the women in their
Speaker 7: lives should do that tonight.
Speaker 2: Yes, we'll play that whole clip.
Speaker 1: My digressions kind of interrupted the flow of that, so
Speaker 1: we'll play that whole clip.
Speaker 2: After the break. We've got Oh this text are getting
Speaker 2: after me? Holy cow, imagine that. Listen.
Speaker 1: No, but but I mean, Dan quote whole big fella
Speaker 1: you say sounds so belittling. Hey, whoa, I just I
Speaker 1: was talking to a guy. We just agreed on something
Speaker 1: as a whole big fella. Since when is that rough?
Speaker 1: And you tell me Ryan, I mean a man can't
Speaker 1: sit on his own jury. Has anybody ever treated callers better?
Speaker 1: Den't talk radio now with more kindness. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kaplo Show.