Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Each and every
Speaker 1: day there's something new, and we look forward to bringing
Speaker 1: that to you, in part because most days it's going
Speaker 1: to be something positive.
Speaker 2: If like me, you want to see.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump elected and America saved, and once again today
Speaker 1: we have plenty of good news.
Speaker 2: It's not all good news.
Speaker 1: Every day that it'd probably even get kind of boring,
Speaker 1: but a lot of good news in the polling and beyond,
Speaker 1: and we want to dive into that.
Speaker 2: Lots going on locally as well.
Speaker 1: Daniel Chinsky joined us at four thirty six to talk
Speaker 1: about I saw on Fox News today talking about what's going.
Speaker 2: On out in Aurora, and Danielle was telling us today.
Speaker 1: She says that gangs are taking over apartment complexes and
Speaker 1: then they're serving as the landlords to tenants, etc. Which
Speaker 1: seems consistent with what Mayor Hoffman had told us on
Speaker 1: Are a couple three weeks ago, which was that there
Speaker 1: were entire blocks in Aurora that Aurora had to take back.
Speaker 1: So look forward to the merit joining us next week.
Speaker 1: But I know during the break, guys, I saw some
Speaker 1: video on KDVR or tweeted out by KDVR that showed
Speaker 1: at least one looked like an AR or a similar
Speaker 1: type of weapon, you know, being carried by a gang
Speaker 1: roaming through one of the apartment complexes, opening doors, etc.
Speaker 1: So it's a national story now big local story, and
Speaker 1: we look forward to having a Mayor Kaufman on soon
Speaker 1: also out of DIA in studio for a full hour,
Speaker 1: we hope next week DA trains running at limited capacity
Speaker 1: after mechanical issue, and I won't dwell on it today,
Speaker 1: but I'd love to know the real story someday, because
Speaker 1: nobody can be that stupid right to design DIA the
Speaker 1: way it was originally designed.
Speaker 2: Nobody can be that stupid.
Speaker 1: So who influenced whom in order to get certain things done?
Speaker 1: And let me start with the most, you've got to
Speaker 1: have a way to walk between these concourses. But beyond that,
Speaker 1: who in the world would design an airport where when
Speaker 1: you pick up your luggage after a long trip, you
Speaker 1: cannot walk out the door on that same floor.
Speaker 3: Nope, you have to.
Speaker 1: Get on an elevator or risk death on an escalator
Speaker 1: in order to get to.
Speaker 2: The floor where you can then leave. Uh huh. Nobody
Speaker 2: could be that stupid.
Speaker 4: So anyway, I've got one other complaint about DIA. Why
Speaker 4: in the original design they moved Stapleton right, They had
Speaker 4: to Denver was going to grow, and they anticipated that,
Speaker 4: and that was smart.
Speaker 3: However, you set it out way to the east.
Speaker 4: Why Dan, are there only two lanes in either direction
Speaker 4: on pain of Boulevard?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Right, yeah?
Speaker 1: And why name it after a living guy? And listen,
Speaker 1: we are politics different. I like Payin you just fine
Speaker 1: had him on a bunch, and I think our kids
Speaker 1: played on the same baseball team. But you don't name
Speaker 1: a highway like that after a living person.
Speaker 4: But there's no reason, Dan, and I'm not an engineer,
Speaker 4: but to have three lanes in either direction the whole
Speaker 4: way from when you go off of Ice seventy dude
Speaker 4: to get out there and back. No, you gotta two
Speaker 4: lanes and now it's jamming aacked.
Speaker 1: You don't have to tell me how much there is
Speaker 1: that stinks about that DIA deal. I mean, I'm the
Speaker 1: guy I'll tell you true story. I'm the guy who
Speaker 1: was threatened in a way very few people in the
Speaker 1: media have ever been threatened. When I was breaking the
Speaker 1: story on Channel four, I was their legal analyst at
Speaker 1: the time, and credit to Channel four for having the
Speaker 1: guts to run with it.
Speaker 2: But I had it well documented.
Speaker 1: You know, I was breaking the story that wait a second,
Speaker 1: you know the city may have been misleading bond buyers
Speaker 1: about when that.
Speaker 2: Airport was going to open.
Speaker 1: So I broke that story and had everything we reported
Speaker 1: was backed up. And then get this, right, I get
Speaker 1: this call. I get this call. Came about a month
Speaker 1: away from my wedding at the time this story breaks,
Speaker 1: and I get this call and uh, hey, Dan, you
Speaker 1: know want you to come down, Want you to come
Speaker 1: down to the city Attorney's office. Okay, yeah, what time
Speaker 1: you want me there? Six o'clock, six o'clock at night, So, huh,
Speaker 1: I'm fine. I go down to the City Attorney's office.
Speaker 1: It turned into a very let's say, a very very
Speaker 1: long intense conversation in which I was not doing much talking.
Speaker 1: And I was informed during this conversation that if I
Speaker 1: don't back off my story, if I don't back off
Speaker 1: my story. Not only am I going to get sued,
Speaker 1: my law firm's going to get sued. And I said
Speaker 1: my law firm and they said, yeah, you sent this
Speaker 1: public records request on your law firm letterhead.
Speaker 2: So so it's.
Speaker 1: Remarkable, as I remember it went to like ten at night,
Speaker 1: and and then I don't remember the verbatim.
Speaker 2: It was so many years ago. But but.
Speaker 1: I was left with the very distinct impression that very
Speaker 1: very bad things and I'm just I'm not talking about
Speaker 1: anything criminal, but very very bad things were going to
Speaker 1: happen to me in terms of lawsuits, et cetera if
Speaker 1: I did not back off, and you know, everlasting credit,
Speaker 1: everlasting credit to Channel four and to KOA Radio Lee Larson,
Speaker 1: and they did not back off, threat of lawsuit, lawyers hired,
Speaker 1: everything else. They did not back off. They stuck with
Speaker 1: the story. And when the SEC, I was called into
Speaker 1: the SEC offices in this region in Denver, and I
Speaker 1: can't remember if it was the top guy. I think
Speaker 1: it may have been, but one of the top people
Speaker 1: in the SEC said, hey, man, we've been following your stories.
Speaker 1: We want your files. And I said, hey, they are
Speaker 1: all yours. Station gave permission, turned over my files and
Speaker 1: they began to pursue it. So all I'm saying is
Speaker 1: there were a lot, a lot of questions surrounding that
Speaker 1: whole DIA thing when it started. And to his credit, listen,
Speaker 1: I want to give credit to Meyorweb because Mayor Web,
Speaker 1: I think we went to lunch one day or he
Speaker 1: initiated something and and he just said, hey, Dan, I'm
Speaker 1: I heard your story about what happened at the City
Speaker 1: Attorney's office at night, and I just want to tell
Speaker 1: you that I don't know all the details, but but
Speaker 1: I apologize. He said, I never I never would have
Speaker 1: wanted anything like that to happen. So, you know, kudos
Speaker 1: to Mayor Web for stepping up and making that point.
Speaker 1: But but yeah, I was just so impressed Channel four,
Speaker 1: their management, KOA, their management, all these threats coming down
Speaker 1: on them. They stuck behind the story and they should
Speaker 1: have eight five five for zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five the number. Glad you're here, Hey, Polling, there is
Speaker 1: no doubt now on equivocally no DNC bounce for Kamala Harrison.
Speaker 1: Think about how significant that is with all of the
Speaker 1: bubble rep all of the protection everything she had going
Speaker 1: for her from the media, no bounce from the DNC.
Speaker 1: What does that tell you, mister fung? And that leads
Speaker 1: us to some interesting sound here where Eugene Robinson from
Speaker 1: the hard Left on MSNBC says, listen, yeah, Harris campaign
Speaker 1: is trying to change the rules of the debate because
Speaker 1: they can, because Trump needs it more than they do.
Speaker 5: The Harris campaign is trying to change the rules, right,
Speaker 5: I mean three weeks two, three weeks ago, they were saying, no,
Speaker 5: we're gonna stick with the rules that were agreed with,
Speaker 5: you know, for the for the Biden debate, when it's
Speaker 5: going to be September tenth, it's going to be ABC,
Speaker 5: the same rules. And now they're saying, well, but we
Speaker 5: want to change this rule. They're doing that because they can,
Speaker 5: because at this point it looks to me as if
Speaker 5: Donald Trump believes he needs this debate more than Kamala
Speaker 5: Harris does.
Speaker 2: Do you think that's true?
Speaker 1: Right now, let me ask you, listen, the debate's going
Speaker 1: to happen, right, I mean, Trump's whole brand had his strength.
Speaker 2: She's obviously weak.
Speaker 1: Trump is not going to take a hit on his
Speaker 1: brand by not showing up. He's going to show up
Speaker 1: no matter what, and he should. But if there was
Speaker 1: at this point, if there was a way to get
Speaker 1: out of the debate without looking weak, would you advise
Speaker 1: Trump to do that? Because right now the trend line
Speaker 1: is not good for Kamala Harris. I think Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: needs this debate right now more than Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: I think proof of that is the Harris camp, after
Speaker 1: saying there would just be one debate agreed to now,
Speaker 1: the Harris camp then said they wanted a debate October. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: who do you think needs the debate more right now?
Speaker 1: Trump or Harris. The other thing I want to get
Speaker 1: to and there isn't time for it now, is the
Speaker 1: Harris camp remains adamant that they want the mics on
Speaker 1: full time in that debate. Now, in the end, they're
Speaker 1: not going to get that unless Trump agrees to it,
Speaker 1: because ABC is saying they're going to stick with the
Speaker 1: original rules. ABC is saying that after Trump has brought
Speaker 1: the public pressure. But in the end, do you think
Speaker 1: it would be better for Trump to have the mics on?
Speaker 1: And why do you think the Harris campaign is so
Speaker 1: determined that Trump's mic remain on while she's talking eight
Speaker 1: five five or zero five eight two five five. And
Speaker 1: I know what the obvious answer to that is, but
Speaker 1: what do you think is really going on there?
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 3: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6: The Governor and I and we were all doing a
Speaker 6: tour of the library here and I'm talking about the
Speaker 6: significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of
Speaker 6: the passage of time.
Speaker 7: So when you think about it.
Speaker 6: There is great significance to the passage of time in
Speaker 6: terms of what we need to do to lay these wires,
Speaker 6: what we need to do to create these jobs. And
Speaker 6: there is such great signif efficants to the passage of
Speaker 6: time when we think about a day in the life
Speaker 6: of our.
Speaker 2: Children five point twenty one.
Speaker 1: And the reason some of these oldies but goodies are
Speaker 1: popping up is is obviously there's much more thought being
Speaker 1: given now to whether there's something really wrong with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: When it gets to the point where the cabal the
Speaker 1: campaign has to admit that she cannot go out into
Speaker 1: a friendly interview on her own, she has to have
Speaker 1: tim Walls of all people go with her. They know
Speaker 1: those optics are terrible. They know it makes it look
Speaker 1: very weak. So it's an admission there's something wrong there.
Speaker 6: Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree?
Speaker 6: You exist in the context of all in which you
Speaker 6: live and what came before you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so, well, probably never know what it is, because
Speaker 1: I don't think she's going to win the presidency. If
Speaker 1: she wins, we probably find out after that in a
Speaker 1: very very painful way. But we'll probably never know what
Speaker 1: it is. But there's obviously something wrong and it's obviously disqualifying.
Speaker 1: Let's go to the phone lines and fuy go how
Speaker 1: about Dan and Centennial. You're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 8: Welcome, Hey Dan, how's you going living the dream?
Speaker 2: My friend?
Speaker 8: Hey, So, I've been living in Denver pretty much my
Speaker 8: whole life, and I worked for the airline for fifteen years,
Speaker 8: and in ninety ninety one I was working for Continental.
Speaker 8: I started at A one and ninety one. I've worked
Speaker 8: for Continental and was a sign to the DA Continental
Speaker 8: construction team to be on site out there.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 8: And you had to run the baggage tests and do
Speaker 8: all that stuff with that failed program. But there even that,
Speaker 8: they put the regular folks have to drop a level
Speaker 8: of Yes, they wanted all the sets. They wanted all
Speaker 8: the shuttle buses and ground service and taxi cabs and
Speaker 8: all that other stuff to be right outside bag you
Speaker 8: calim to case they had to stand there waiting in
Speaker 8: the weather.
Speaker 2: R Well, thank you for clearing that up.
Speaker 7: Dan.
Speaker 1: It's it is the stupidest thing I've ever heard right
Speaker 1: at di A and I talked about it earlier, and
Speaker 1: Dan just gave us a.
Speaker 2: Story behind it.
Speaker 1: You pick up your luggage, as you know, you can't
Speaker 1: just pick up your luggage and roll out and get
Speaker 1: into a car. You have to go to a different floor.
Speaker 1: I don't I didn't think there was a person on
Speaker 1: the face of the air stupid enough to design a
Speaker 1: building that way. But Dan and I must have just
Speaker 1: missed because I worked for Continental Airlines in baggage. But
Speaker 1: that was out at the old Stapleton Back to the
Speaker 1: phone lines. How about Brian and Arvada, Colorado. You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2: Welcome and you know I think.
Speaker 8: Anything.
Speaker 2: Brian, obviously my.
Speaker 1: Friend, you're you're a little choppy right now. We're going
Speaker 1: to try to get you back in a second. Let's
Speaker 1: go to beautiful Peblo. Talk to Patrick here on the
Speaker 1: dan Kaplas.
Speaker 7: Sh'll welcome, Hey, Dan, Hey, Well, Kelly kind of corrected
Speaker 7: me here. I was going to call in and say
Speaker 7: that eighty two percent of Kamala's staff is clit. That's
Speaker 7: got to say something. I'd like to know what some
Speaker 7: of those people quit over, you know why they left.
Speaker 7: But she said it's ninety two percent. And I'll tell
Speaker 7: you what, There's got to be something wrong if you've
Speaker 7: got that much of a problem with people that you've hired. Yeah,
Speaker 7: And I don't trust these polls because I believe there's
Speaker 7: a lot of foreign influence right now. And like when
Speaker 7: ABC gives Kamala's, say, a one point lead, well that
Speaker 7: tells me she must really be down because that's a
Speaker 7: that's a friendly source there.
Speaker 2: Now, that is a great point. Patrick.
Speaker 1: Can you look historically and you know when this time
Speaker 1: in the past, right, I think probably in sixteen Clinton
Speaker 1: probably at a six to seven point lead in the
Speaker 1: nation race, Biden probably five six, stuff like that. So clearly,
Speaker 1: now consensus of the polls is as much as most
Speaker 1: of the polls are trying to lie to help Paris.
Speaker 1: Consensus of the polls, is no bounce out of the
Speaker 1: DNC in and of itself. I think that's huge news.
Speaker 1: Then we can point to individual other polls that again
Speaker 1: I read as encouraging because of the trend line. Right,
Speaker 1: because of the trend line. Even if Ryan you tell me,
Speaker 1: because you're a pole geek like me, if the election
Speaker 1: was held today, right based on the polls, we're looking
Speaker 1: at who wins Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: I think that's true.
Speaker 4: I think he wins again. And it's sound like a
Speaker 4: broken record. I'm going to call it the ac C strategy.
Speaker 4: We're coming into college football season here, and if I
Speaker 4: were part of the Trump team, I'm not. But if
Speaker 4: I were and I were being advised the acc strategy
Speaker 4: Atlantic Coast Conference would be Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia. He
Speaker 4: wins those three states, he wins the election.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 4: Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin would not matter. If Trump wins
Speaker 4: the three states I just stated, and obviously holds Ohio, Iowa, Texas, Florida,
Speaker 4: he wins Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia.
Speaker 3: He's in the White House.
Speaker 1: Well, And in addition to just the numbers in the polls,
Speaker 1: you have to look at. You have to look at
Speaker 1: the overarching factors, the powerful currents in the race, and
Speaker 1: the most powerful of all of those is the well
Speaker 1: founded belief that America is not going to elect a
Speaker 1: San Francisco radical. And remember, I mean, but Biden only
Speaker 1: pulled it off by a handful of votes. First, that
Speaker 1: the media rigged the election by not reporting the hunter
Speaker 1: Joe Biden corruption story with the laptop. If that story
Speaker 1: had been fairly reported, Biden loses. But beyond that, you know,
Speaker 1: he also only won because he pulled off the con
Speaker 1: that he was some kind of moderate. America is simply
Speaker 1: not going to elect a San Francisco radical. I don't
Speaker 1: care if it's male, female, this color, that color, whatever,
Speaker 1: ain't gonna happen.
Speaker 4: Here's my other point that it has to happen. It's
Speaker 4: going to happen a little bit in this interview, you
Speaker 4: would figure, even with Dana Bash being a friendly the
Speaker 4: debate her on the campaign trail, she's got to come
Speaker 4: out and flesh out a policy position on all these
Speaker 4: things that she allegedly flip flopped on, and that doesn't
Speaker 4: break well for her either way.
Speaker 3: Dan.
Speaker 4: If she flip flops on them, then she's abandoned the
Speaker 4: Left in their base, and they're going to be wondering, well,
Speaker 4: what are you doing. I thought you were in favor
Speaker 4: of the Green New Deal in Medicare for all. If
Speaker 4: she and then to the other point of that, people
Speaker 4: aren't going to believe her if she just flips on
Speaker 4: every one of these issues.
Speaker 1: But let me point out, respectfully, a possible fatal flaw
Speaker 1: in your analysis. Not your analysis. I'm not suggesting you
Speaker 1: have to take your analysis, but the left at this point, Ryan,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris could come out in her speech on September ten,
Speaker 1: where she'll be protected by ABC. She could come out
Speaker 1: and take every single position Donald Trump takes.
Speaker 2: Build the wall, build it now.
Speaker 1: I want to build it ten feet higher than Trump,
Speaker 1: says Kamala Harris. And the left still going to vote
Speaker 1: for her because they're going to know she's lying. They're
Speaker 1: still going to vote for and right, I mean that
Speaker 1: they're just going to bet that she's lying.
Speaker 4: So how many people in the middle of the road
Speaker 4: politically are going to buy her bs that she's flipped
Speaker 4: on all these positions. I don't think that's why she's
Speaker 4: going to lose the race, right, I don't think it's
Speaker 4: a sale she can make.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I and listen.
Speaker 1: This is where we get into those other subjective I
Speaker 1: think powerful currents in the race, and that is that
Speaker 1: the swing states are the swing states for a reason,
Speaker 1: that the swing state voters who go back and forth
Speaker 1: and decide these elections are like that for a reason.
Speaker 1: And they know they know about her from the three
Speaker 1: and a half years she's been VP, but they also
Speaker 1: know that she didn't get a single vote, that she
Speaker 1: wasn't elected. She doesn't have the gravitas, she doesn't have
Speaker 1: the weight, she doesn't have the credibility that comes from
Speaker 1: winning a primary. They know that Joe Biden was deposed,
Speaker 1: They know this whole set of circumstances, all of that
Speaker 1: ways against her, and in race as close as this
Speaker 1: one may well be, I think all of those currents
Speaker 1: are really going to matter, and they're going to break
Speaker 1: in Trump's favor. Eight five five for zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five to five. Come back to our lines, come
Speaker 1: back to great Texters. But what do you want to hear?
Speaker 1: Dana Bash, not ask, but pursue with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Tomorrow, You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2: Have you not agreed to muted microphones?
Speaker 9: Yill.
Speaker 10: I think we've made pretty clear our pooks, how along
Speaker 10: with Donald Trump himself, is for unmuted microphones. I think
Speaker 10: the question that you got to ask is to Donald
Speaker 10: Trump and his and his team. Are they in agreement
Speaker 10: between themselves on how we should approach this debate because
Speaker 10: we are in agreement with Donald Trump that he should
Speaker 10: be live and unmuted microphone.
Speaker 2: Yeah, fascinating.
Speaker 1: You know again, it comes back to it appears to
Speaker 1: be the emo of the Harris campaign. That's somehow, you know,
Speaker 1: being angry and being mean and being jerks is some
Speaker 1: kind of substitute for real strength because you get that
Speaker 1: attitude from them. You get that attitude from these various
Speaker 1: spokespersons in almost every single interview. But Berman on CNN
Speaker 1: did a great job of pinning down the hair spokesperson
Speaker 1: and at times appeared openly frustrated with the hair spokesperson.
Speaker 1: Just said, Hey, I just want to know. ABC has
Speaker 1: said these are the rules. The mics are muted. Do
Speaker 1: you agree to the rules and listen In the end,
Speaker 1: the mics are going to be muted and it's absolutely
Speaker 1: critical for Donald Trump that they be muted, not for
Speaker 1: the reason everybody's talking about. Because everybody says, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's to Trump's benefit that the MIC's off when he's
Speaker 1: not talking, because then he won't interrupt as much and
Speaker 1: look bad and turn off photers. I understand that's the
Speaker 1: popular perception, and you know, maybe there's truth in that,
Speaker 1: but but that's not the reason the Harris camp is
Speaker 1: so furiously dedicated to getting those mics on. Here's their problem. Okay, Obviously,
Speaker 1: obviously Kamala Harris has some kind of challenge, some kind
Speaker 1: of issue, some kind of processing issue that makes it
Speaker 1: very difficult for her to think on her feet. We've
Speaker 1: seen that a million times, right, That's why they hide her.
Speaker 1: That's why she needs Tim Walls with her for a
Speaker 1: friendly tomorrow with CNN. So she's got this issue wherever
Speaker 1: it comes from, and we may never know the origin
Speaker 1: she's got this problem. But when the mics are muted,
Speaker 1: when Trump's mike is off, what he's able to do
Speaker 1: is what he did to Biden, and this gets very
Speaker 1: little attention.
Speaker 7: Ryan.
Speaker 2: He gets to chirp at her.
Speaker 1: And distract her, and the audience doesn't know he's doing
Speaker 1: it because his mic'saw.
Speaker 2: It right, and that really threw Biden off.
Speaker 1: Now, you could take somebody super sharp like okay, Barack
Speaker 1: Obama was a s'more on smart guy who did moronic
Speaker 1: things that really hurt the country. But a very very
Speaker 1: smart guy, even a super smart, sharp on his feet
Speaker 1: normally guy like Obama would have a hard time with, say,
Speaker 1: if John McCain had been chirping at him and the
Speaker 1: audience couldn't hear McCain chirping at him.
Speaker 2: So it's a tremendous.
Speaker 1: Advantage for Trump to be able to throw her off
Speaker 1: like that without the audience being able to hear him
Speaker 1: doing it. That's why it's so critical that the current
Speaker 1: rules stay in effect, and his might be off when
Speaker 1: it's not his turn to speak. That's what the Harris
Speaker 1: campaign is so concerned about. Brian and Arvada. You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kapla show. Welcome, Hey Brian. Hmm, okay, Brian
Speaker 1: is a soft spoken type. We've had a little trouble
Speaker 1: with that phone line. Let me get to some of
Speaker 1: these texts, and there are a great great text eight
Speaker 1: five for zero five, A two five five text Dan
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine. Dan lawyers are known to
Speaker 1: have pretty good I cus Ta kamaa get up pass
Speaker 1: in grading her academics. Somehow, Bob and nerveda great question, Bob, No,
Speaker 1: I listen. I'm the guy who's constantly saying on air,
Speaker 1: she is not a dummy, she is not a stupid person.
Speaker 1: There are all different types of smart, and there are
Speaker 1: lots of smart people who have processing issues. I mean,
Speaker 1: they may be intellectually smart, but they can't process quickly,
Speaker 1: they can't think on their feet, they can't defend a position.
Speaker 1: Then you get smart people who have other overlays. You
Speaker 1: can get some really smart people who then don't process
Speaker 1: as well. They aren't cognitively as intact because they have
Speaker 1: other kind of impairments. So I believe that she's an
Speaker 1: intelligent person who has processing issues and has some kind
Speaker 1: of challenge. So I don't think she's any dummy. I
Speaker 1: just think she's incapable of being president because of these issues.
Speaker 3: She failed the California bar the first time.
Speaker 1: Ryan, I know so many great lawyers who find the
Speaker 1: bar from I was very blessed to pass. And I'm told,
Speaker 1: don't we just sound like Trump? And I'm told was
Speaker 1: at the very top of my class, not number one
Speaker 1: or two, and they don't keep a formal rank.
Speaker 2: But I knew somebody who knew.
Speaker 1: Okaypective, but just let me, can I emphasize one thing,
Speaker 1: Kelly again, not to be redundant. There are so many
Speaker 1: truly great lawyers who failed the bar the first time, because, guys,
Speaker 1: the bar exam is not about your ability to practice law,
Speaker 1: It's about your ability to take a test.
Speaker 2: Yes, Kelly, thank you. Okay.
Speaker 9: From a woman's perspective, she's not very intelligent.
Speaker 1: You're not into kind of the fine points of processing
Speaker 1: issues or any of that.
Speaker 2: Okay, you know.
Speaker 9: I would say if it was one or two occasions
Speaker 9: where it was a processing error, like sometimes Trump will
Speaker 9: speak and he'll bloviate and do all of those things
Speaker 9: that we all kind of go.
Speaker 6: Really do you have to go there?
Speaker 2: But for her it's a recurring condition, thank you.
Speaker 1: I do think, Kelly, there is an obvious functional problem.
Speaker 4: I think you said this before, Dan, and I absolutely
Speaker 4: think a spot on. She has some kind of social
Speaker 4: anxiety disorder when she's doing these weird things with laughing
Speaker 4: at her own jokes, but nobody else is laughing. The
Speaker 4: coconut tree thing like, very bizarre behavior and social settings.
Speaker 3: I think that's part of it.
Speaker 2: And I have not drawn any conclusions because I can't.
Speaker 1: No, Listen, I spend my life, you know how, I
Speaker 1: spend my days with subpoena power. I spend my days
Speaker 1: examining witnesses under oath, obtaining documents through subpoenas, drilling down
Speaker 1: to get to the truth. Ryan, And this I can
Speaker 1: tell you. I can't possibly know the origin of her
Speaker 1: functional impairment without subpoena power access to her medical records
Speaker 1: that stuff.
Speaker 2: But all I know is there is one. There is
Speaker 2: a functional.
Speaker 1: Impairment, and it's the type which prevents her from being
Speaker 1: an effective president. And that's separate apart from policy. I mean,
Speaker 1: she shouldn't be president just based on policy. But this,
Speaker 1: but listen, is one of those, Ryan, is one of
Speaker 1: those potential explanations for this obvious functional impairment. Is it
Speaker 1: possible that she has a major anxiety disorder which she
Speaker 1: then either clinically and or self medicais for it. That's
Speaker 1: one of a lot of different possibilities. Sure, but we
Speaker 1: can't possibly know who was the Rogan skit. You should
Speaker 1: pull that with a guy. Well, he did America's Wine, Mom.
Speaker 1: And I'm not drawing any conclusions. I'm not saying it's
Speaker 1: this or it's that. I'm just saying it's obviously something,
Speaker 1: and that's why they're hiding her.
Speaker 3: They have to, and that's very true.
Speaker 4: There was also talk that even some of her closest
Speaker 4: advisors were telling her, you've got to do a tough interview,
Speaker 4: and she was adamant that that was not what she
Speaker 4: was going to do.
Speaker 3: And there's just so much evidence.
Speaker 4: Dan, It's out there, it's on video, it's the recordings
Speaker 4: that I do, all these deep thoughts that I have
Speaker 4: with her of her saying these very strange, bizarre things
Speaker 4: talking to kids about outer space. I mean, give you
Speaker 4: hundreds of examples, but to the gut felled rule, you
Speaker 4: can't give me one example where she said something very
Speaker 4: profound that stands out.
Speaker 2: Oh, let's be fair, what about this one?
Speaker 11: And as a woman, there's a balance to be struck
Speaker 11: between being tough.
Speaker 2: And being a bitch, or what about this one?
Speaker 11: So you're now no longer are you necessarily keeping those
Speaker 11: private files in some file cabinet that's locked in the
Speaker 11: basement of the house, it's on your laptop and it's
Speaker 11: then therefore up here in this cloud.
Speaker 12: What about you know, we have to say woke, like
Speaker 12: everybody needs to be woke, and you can talk about
Speaker 12: if you're the WOKEUSS or woker, just stay more woke
Speaker 12: than less woke.
Speaker 6: Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree.
Speaker 2: Ryan, You're not being fair to her.
Speaker 7: I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, yeah, but anyway, so my bottom line is
Speaker 1: Dana Bash tomorrow is going to ask Kamala Harris lots
Speaker 1: of tough questions and that will be meaningless. That'll be
Speaker 1: a favor to Harris because what Dana Bash isn't going
Speaker 1: to do is follow up. She isn't going to pursue
Speaker 1: Harris until she gets an answer. So that's why that
Speaker 1: interview between that and the editing that's going to occur later.
Speaker 1: Here's a question for you if if Waltz makes the
Speaker 1: fatal mistake of stepping in to bail her out, Man's
Speaker 1: plain would see an even show it or is that
Speaker 1: just going to be edited out cutting room FLOORA yeah,
Speaker 1: eight five five four zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: the number come back to our fiery text.
Speaker 2: You're on Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 13: It's been nearly forty days since Kamala Harris became the
Speaker 13: installed nominee of the Democrat Party, and she's finally sitting
Speaker 13: down for an interview, but not by herself. She is
Speaker 13: sitting down with her running mate, Tim Walls. And I
Speaker 13: think it's quite sad that the woman trying to be
Speaker 13: the first female president of the United States needs her
Speaker 13: male running mate by her side in her first sit
Speaker 13: down interview.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's a Trump spokesman. But it's an undeniable truth.
Speaker 1: And I think that's a big key to these close
Speaker 1: races is what are the undeniable truths that are important
Speaker 1: enough that many of these swing voters are going to
Speaker 1: be aware of them? And this is one of those
Speaker 1: that she's not able to go to this friendly interview
Speaker 1: on her own. She has to bring her running mate,
Speaker 1: who happens to be male. That's so bad for her
Speaker 1: without anybody having to make the argument, right. I mean
Speaker 1: that the really winning points are the points that voters
Speaker 1: realize on their own, and you just have to present
Speaker 1: the information and then they draw that own conclusion. Because
Speaker 1: it's so obvious and true. So Harris knows this, The
Speaker 1: cabal knows this. So why are they doing it anyway? Well,
Speaker 1: because they have to, because she has some kind of impairment,
Speaker 1: functional impairment, which makes it necessary for her to do this.
Speaker 1: I think that's the undeniable reality. I can't know what
Speaker 1: that functional impairment is. I don't think anybody from the
Speaker 1: outside can know. People can guess, but all we can
Speaker 1: know is it's a disqualifier. It's so bad that she
Speaker 1: can't be present, and if she can't go to a
Speaker 1: friendly interview and sit down on her own, she cannot
Speaker 1: be president. I think Ryan, it'll never show up in
Speaker 1: any particular poll. It won't be polled as an individual issue,
Speaker 1: it won't be in the exit polls. But I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be at all surprised if come election day this is
Speaker 1: one of those five to ten points slash truce that
Speaker 1: is having the greatest impact across the swing states on
Speaker 1: election day, and it ties into the larger issue of weakness.
Speaker 2: But it's a big deal. Dan.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine President Kamala at a high level dinner
Speaker 1: in France or Italy and suddenly plunking a cube of
Speaker 1: ice into her white wine. That from Andy, I could
Speaker 1: picture that I can't take it end as well for
Speaker 1: our country. But yeah, Dan, why have you thought Ryan?
Speaker 2: Is it all fair?
Speaker 1: Yes, his agenda and rarely presents the other side. Ryan,
Speaker 1: you have officially arrived, not that there was any doubt
Speaker 1: when people are taking shots at you on somebody else's
Speaker 1: show to know what's my agenda?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, doing what is your agenda other than your next date?
Speaker 2: Or yeah, what is your ronda?
Speaker 1: Yeah it's Oh, by the way, I got to work
Speaker 1: this in before the end of the show. If there's
Speaker 1: two contributions I hope to have made to society, one
Speaker 1: is warning people all the time when the light turns green,
Speaker 1: look both ways because so many people are running red lights.
Speaker 1: But the other is predicting the outcome of CEU games
Speaker 1: and see.
Speaker 2: You opener tomorrow night.
Speaker 1: A very good North Dakota State team. Many experts picking
Speaker 1: North Dakota State. I think CEU will not only win,
Speaker 1: but will win by a lot, bigly, bigly. Yes, I
Speaker 1: think this is a very good see team. I just
Speaker 1: start with the fact that you have the best quarterback
Speaker 1: in the country. That's a pretty good starting point. Dan
Speaker 1: If Kamala has all these issues you Ryan and Kelly
Speaker 1: are implying, aren't her accomplishments pretty good? In spite of those? Texter,
Speaker 1: thank you? Please call the show. I'd want to ask
Speaker 1: you what accomplishments. I'd really I would love to know
Speaker 1: what accomplishments. I understand that. Yeah, she became San Francisco DA.
Speaker 1: I understand, became an elected United States senator. I understand
Speaker 1: she was selected to be vice president and became vice
Speaker 1: president when Joe Biden won. But what are her accomplishments
Speaker 1: within all of that? And remember, she was picked by
Speaker 1: Biden because of her weakness, not because of any accomplishments,
Speaker 1: just like Obama picked Biden because of his weakness. Obama
Speaker 1: wanted somebody as VP who nobody out there would want
Speaker 1: as president, and that's what Biden did. He picked Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: who got knocked out two months before the Iowa primaries
Speaker 1: because she was so bad she made him look good,
Speaker 1: just like Biden was so bad, he made Obama look good.
Speaker 1: So she didn't get to be VP because of accomplishments.
Speaker 1: And obviously she didn't get a single vote here to
Speaker 1: become nominee. So I'd like to have that conversation, because
Speaker 1: I garan friggin tee this. There are millions and millions
Speaker 1: and millions of far more accomplished people than Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: You've never heard of and I'll never hear of. My father, Okay,
Speaker 1: infinitely more accomplished than Kamala Harris. He wasn't elected to this,
Speaker 1: he wasn't elected to that. You know, he wasn't a
Speaker 1: household name outside of our household. Everybody knew him, respected
Speaker 1: him a little bit different than Kamala Harris, but he
Speaker 1: was far more accomplished. My mother, who could have been
Speaker 1: anything and gave it all up for the toughest job
Speaker 1: in the world raising we five bancheese? Is that proper
Speaker 1: grammar Ryne? My mother was a million times more accomplished
Speaker 1: than Kamala Harris. So what accomplishments are we talking about here?
Speaker 2: Dan?
Speaker 1: As Jessa Otel said, she's thick as a brick. I
Speaker 1: think she's an intelligent person who has functional, some kind
Speaker 1: of functional impairment that disqualifies her from the job. Ah,
Speaker 1: we have so many other great texts. I'd say I'm
Speaker 1: going to try to get to some of these.
Speaker 2: Tomorrow.
Speaker 1: John Caldera will have the show tomorrow. I'll be back Friday.
Speaker 1: But you know John, if you're new to the area,
Speaker 1: John is iconic, and he's funny, and he's a historian.
Speaker 1: He's seen so much happen in Colorado over the year,
Speaker 1: so he'll have his own fun, unique take on all
Speaker 1: of this. And of course Ryan, you're gonna be here
Speaker 1: with him, right and Kelly as well.
Speaker 3: We always have a good time.
Speaker 4: Usually we're talking about star treking Gilligan's Island and stuff
Speaker 4: like that.
Speaker 3: But it'll be fun.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And we're just gonna have one of the great
Speaker 1: family outings ever right, just our whole family. We're heading
Speaker 1: up to Boulder. We're gonna have a little picnic on
Speaker 1: far and Field. Awesome, wander over to the stadium. These
Speaker 1: kids they were raised in folsom Field. They were going
Speaker 1: there since they were babies. So it's just going to
Speaker 1: be a real fun family outing. Hey, have a great,
Speaker 1: safe night. Please be back on our show tomorrow.
Speaker 2: On The Dan Captain Show,