Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of The
Diddy Diaries. In this episode, we're getting right back to
that Sarah Rivers lawsuit filed against Ditty. Seventeenth cause of
action intentional infliction of emotional distress against all defendants. Plaintiff
incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and realegis them as
if set forth fully herein. Defendants engaged in conduct toward
plaintiff that is extreme and outrageous to exceed the bounds
of decency in a civilized society, namely by inderelia subjecting
her to sexual assault, battery, and misconduct. The sexual assault, battery,
and misconduct by defendants were extreme and outrageous conduct that
shocks the conscience. These actions were taken with the intent
to cause or disregard for the substantial probability of causing
severe emotional distress. As a direct and approximate result of
defendants extreme and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff has suffered severe emotional distress.
Defendant's conduct, specifically defending Ditty, was wanton, malicious, willful, and
or cruel, entitling the plaintiff to punitive damages. Eighteenth cause
of action tortious interference with perspective, contractual, or business relations
against Defendant Ditty. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs
and realegism as if set forth fully Herein, Plaintiff has
added numerous opportunities to enter into contracts with prospective record labels,
music executives, and music producers in the music industry. With
the prospective employees and consultants considering entering into agreements with Plaintiffs,
and with other perspective contracting parties, defending Ditty was made
aware of such opportunities, at a minimum, knew that Plaintiff
actively pursued new contractual and business relations within the music industry.
As set forth above, Defendant Ditty actively participated in inducing
others in the music industry not to work with plaintiff.
As a result, the persons or classes of persons with
whom plaintiff ad perspective can tractual or business relationships were
deceived or confused when determining if they would work with
plaintiff on her music career. In so, such persons or
classes of persons have been and continue to be exposed
repeatedly to false, derogatory, defamatory negative and intentionally misleading information
about plaintiff and her abilities as a performer in the
music industry. As set forth above, the actions of Defending
Ditty were intentional, and this negative referral of plaintiff to
others in the music industry was false. Defending Ditty acted
intentionally and with the sole purpose of harming plaintiff by
use of dishonest, unfair, or improper means. As a result
of such conduct, various record labels, producers, and third parties
in prospective contractual or business relations with plaintiff suspended or
terminated those relations, in one occurrence, terminating those relations in
the middle of a recording session. If not but for
such torty as conduct of Defending Ditty, those third parties
would not have suspended or terminated those relations, which would
have ripened into actual contracts or business relations. By virtue
of such conduct, which includes tortious, intentional, and malicious and
or criminal acts, Defending Ditty interfered and continues to interfere
with Plaintiff's perspective, contractual or business relationships with record labels,
music producers, and other decision making individuals in the music
industry with whom Plaintiff and or businesses have such relations.
As a result, Plaintiff is suffered damage to their perspective, contractual,
or business relations. Defending Ditty's tortous interference with Plaintiff's perspective, contractual,
or business relations has damaged them in an amount to
be determined at trial, believed to be not less than
twenty million dollars. In addition to such damages, Plaintiff seeks
punitive damages as a result of the egregious conduct committed
by Defending Ditty. Nineteen Cause of Action tortious interference with
prospective economic advantage against Defendant Ditty. Plaintiff incorporates by reference
all preceding paragraphs in realigism as if set forth fully
Herein Defendant intended that his false and negative recommendation of
plaintiff would interfere with plaintiff's ability to obtain future employment
in the music industry, and or knew that the false
statements were substantially likely to interfere with plaintiff's ability to
obtain future employment in the music industry. Specifically, Defending Ditty's
false claims about plaintiff were solely intended to pressure other
music industry record labels or insiders not to work with
plaintiff and or disrupt Plaintiff's ability to obtain any other
comparable future employment. Defending Ditty's actions and false statements did
intentionally interfere with Plaintiff's ability to get employment in the
music industry. The false statements made by Defendant Ditty were
retaliatory because plaintiff refused the sexual advances and made for
the purpose for plaintiff to lose other economic opportunities, including
but not limited to, multiple offers to record a deal
with various record labels. As a proximate result of Defending
Ditty's intentional interference, plaintiff has suffered the loss of salary
benefits and additional amounts of money she would have received
had Defended not interfered. As a result of this intentional interference,
Plaintiff has suffered such damages in an amount according to proof.
As a further approximate result of Defending Ditty's intentional actions,
plaintiff has been blackballed and unable to secure any work
in the music industry since Defending Ditty dismantled the group
plaintiff was part of on national television MTB two. Defendant's
false statements and representation have further approximately caused Plaintiff to
suffer shame and disgrace and continues to suffer severe emotional
distress from having her highly successful music career destroyed by
a malicious and reckless campaign spearheaded by Defending Ditty. The
above mentioned actions of Defending Ditty were done with malice, fraud,
or oppression, and in reckless disregard of the Plaintiff's reputation
and need to earn a living. The plaintiff seeks an
award of punitive and exemplary damages in an amount according
to proof twentieth cause of action negligent interference with prospective
economic advantage against Defendant Ditty. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all
preceding paragraphs and realegism as if set forth fully herein.
Defendant new Or should have known that the false statements
would interfere with plaintiff's ability to obtain future employment in
the music industry, and Or New should have known that
his false statements were substantially likely to interfere with Plaintiff's
ability to obtain future employment and reasonably probable economic benefit.
Defendant had a duty to act with reasonable care prior
to making its inflammatory statements against plaintiff so as to
not injure Plaintiff's reputation, occupation, and or financial interest, and
failed to act with reasonable care when they made their
false claims to various individuals in the music industry about
Plaintiff that defendant did not take any reasonable steps to substantiate.
Defendant also failed to exercise reasonable care when it included
plaintiff on a hit list of people that he intended
the black ball in the music industry because Plaintiff rejected
defendants sexual advances, Defendant wholly failed to provide even a
shintilla of evidence or proof supporting any negative actions of plaintiff.
In failing to exercise reasonable care to verify the truth
or falsity of any anonymous allegation, Defendant's false statement directly
caused plaintiff to not be able to secure any employment
in the music industry. As approximate result of defendant's wrongful conduct,
Plaintiff has suffered in the loss of salary, benefits and
additional amounts of money she would have received had defended
not interfered. As a result of this intentional and or
negligent interference, Plaintiff has suffered. Such damage is in an
amount according to proof. As a further approximate result, Plaintiff
has largely been unable to secure any work in the
music industry since Defendant Ditty dismantled her group on national television.
Defendant's false statements have further approximately caused Plaintiff to suffer
shame and disgrace, and she has and continues to suffer
severe emotional distress from having her highly successful music career
destroyed by a malicious and reckless campaign by defendant. Twenty
first cause of action tortious interference with existing contractual or
business relations against Defendant Ditty. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all
preceding paragraphs and reallegis them as if set forth fully
Herein Defending Ditty, through defendants BMMTV and bb knew of
the existing contractual of business relationship between the persons or
classes of persons identified above and Plaintiff, including without limitation
of the existence of valid recording agreements and television appearances
between plastiff and third parties. Defending wrongfully terminated Plaintiff and
transmitted numerous disparaging statements about Plaintiff to others, interfering with
their existing contractual relationships. As a result, the persons or
classes of persons with whom Plaintiff had existing contractual or
business relationships were deceived or confused. In so, such persons
or classes of persons have been and continue to be
exposed repeatedly to false, derogatory, defamatory, negative, and intentionally misleading
information about Plaintiff and their abilities to perform in the
music industry. The statements made by Defending Shawn on the
television show MTB two that the group members needed to
get music out of their life because no one would
go for them over Defending Ditty came true for plaintiff
With respect to Plaintiff's existing contracts with defendants bm MTV,
BB and JCP. Defending Ditty intended to procure and improperly
procured breaches of said contracts without justification. With respect of
plaintiffs existing business relations, Defendant Ditty acted intentionally and with
the sole purpose of harming plaintiffs using dishonest, unfair, and
or improper means. As a result of such conduct, third
parties in privaty of contract or in existing business relations
with plaintiffs suspended, breached determinated contracts, and or suspended or
terminated existing business relations with plaintiff, including the contracts plaintiff
had with defendant BB Bad Boy Records, BM, and MTV.
There would not have been such a suspension, breach, or
termination but for such conduct. By virtue of such conduct,
which includes tortious, intentional, malicious, and or criminal acts, Defending
Ditty interfered and continue to interfere with plaintiffs existing contractual
or business relationships with music labels, music executives, music producers, press,
other industry insiders, and other persons or classes or persons
identified above with whom Plaintiff had such relations. All Plaintiff
has suffered damages tour existing contractual or business relations. Defendants
tortious interference with plaintiff existing contractual or business relations has
damaged them in an amount to be determined that trial,
believed to be not less than twenty million. In addition
to such damages, Plaintiff seeks punitive damages as a result
of the egregious conduct committed by defendant Ditty. As set
forth above, Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendants BM
and MTV to appear on the television show MTB two.
Defendant BBE and Bad Boy Records for a five album
recording contract and Defendant Janis JCP and JCPH for copyright
and songwriter services, which Defendant Ditty intentionally interfered with by
conspiring to steal Plaintiff's copyrighted work and in retaliation for
refusing defendants sexual advances. In doing so, Defending Ditty was
aware of the existence of the contracts and intended to
procure and improperly procured its breach without justification. There would
not have been such termination and or breach but for
the conduct of Defendant Ditty. As a result, Plaintiffs suffered
damages by the loss of the contracts. Defending Ditty's tortouous
interference with the contracts have damaged plaintiff in an amount
to be determined that trial, believed to be no less
than on twenty million. In addition to such damages, Plaintiff
seek's punitive damages as a result of the egregious conduct
committed by Defendant Ditty. Twenty second Cause of action tortious
interference with a contract against Defendant Ditty. Plaintiff incorporates by
reference all preceding paragraphs and realleges them as if set
forth fully hear in at the time all the above
described actions of Defending Ditty were made, he was aware
that plaintiff was employed by defendants bb Bad Boy Records,
bm MTV, JCP, and JCPH, and this specific intent in
engaging in his behavior was to get plaintiff terminated, intentionally
interfered with Plaintiff's music career by saying plaintiff was difficult,
and because drama were solely intended to disrupt the employment
contract between defendants above and plaintiff, the actions and intentional
interference of Defending Ditty did in fact cause termination in
breach of these contracts with plaintiff. Defending Ditty's real motivation
for making false statements about Plaintiff and interfering with her
existing contracts was to retaliate against her for rejecting defendant
Ditti's sexual advances. Defendant Ditty's statement were always categorically false,
and defendant has never provided any corroborating evidence to support
his false claims about Plaintiff. As a proximate result of
Defending Ditty's intentional interference, Plaintiff has suffered the loss of salary,
benefits and additional amounts of money she would have received
had not been terminated as a result of his intentional interference.
Plaintiff has suffered such damages in an amount according to proof.
As a further approximate result, Plaintiff has largely been unable
to secure any work in the music industry since her termination,
including using a highly lucrative recording deal, because of the
damage to his reputation and or the real fear of
retaliation by Defendant Ditty or his affiliated business. Defending Ditty's actions,
false statements, and intentional interference have further approximately caused plaintiff
to suffer shame and disgrace, and she has suffered and
continues to suffer severe emotional distress from having her highly
successful career in the music industry destroyed by a malicious
and reckless smear campaign orchestrated by Defendant Ditty. The actions
of Defendant Ditty were done with malice, fraud, or oppression,
and in reckless disregard for the Plaintiff's reputation and need
earn a living, and Plaintiff seeks an award of punitive
damages and exemplary damages in an amount according to proof.
Final prayer for relief. Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests a judgment
against the defendants that declares defendant Ditty engage in unlawful
practices prohibited by the New York City Victims of Gender
Motivated Violence Protection Acts and that defendant Ditty harassed, assaulted,
and battered. Plaintiff declares that defendants BB bad Boy Records,
Calms Enterprise, UMG, UMG Distribution SJCBMMTV, VIACOM, Paramount, JCP, JCPH
engaged in unlawful practices prohibited by the New York City
Victims of Gender Motivated Violence Protection Act in that they
enabled defendant Ditty's commission of crimes of violence motivated by gender.
Award Plaintiff competitory damages for mental and emotional injury, distress,
pain and suffering, and injury to a reputation, consequential damages,
loss wages, earning, and all other sums of money, together
with interest on these amounts in an amount to be proven.
Awards plaintiff damages against defendants joint and severally awards, loss
wages and other monetary relief in an amount according to proof.
Awards compensatory damages including general and special damages in an
amount according to proof, but in the event of default
not less than twenty million awards plaintiff punitive and exemplary
damages according to proof, but in the event of default
not less than forty million awards plaintiff attorney fees, costs
and expenses incurred in the pursuance of this action, awards
interest on the sum of damages awarded pre judgment and
post judgment interest, and awards plaintiffs such other and further
relief as the Court may deem equitable and proper jury demand.
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues
of fact and damages stated. He're in so triable pursuant
of fed Our civ. P. Thirty eight and the Seventh
Amendment to the United States Constitution. This was dated February
twenty eighth, twenty twenty five, and it was signed by
Ariel Mitchell. All of the information that goes with this episode,
including my contact information, can be found in the description box.