Speaker 1: And we are here.
Speaker 2: Is not a Jew derogatory terms meeting everyone else but us.
Speaker 2: So they want to harm as many boys as they
Speaker 2: possibly can. And look at their talmud. Their talmud says
Speaker 2: kill old Emma Hall. It's your religious duty to steal.
Speaker 3: From them, to bring harm to them.
Speaker 2: Martin Luther, the man who created Protestant Reformation, back in
Speaker 2: fifteen forty three, wrote a book called The Jews and
Speaker 2: their Lies. In this book he outlined toad code of
Speaker 2: Jewish doctors. Jewish doctors are here to poison us Germans.
Speaker 2: This is what he was saying in fifteen The Jews
Speaker 2: and their line and their Lin and their Lin. Jews
Speaker 2: and their Lin and their Lin and their lin Jews
Speaker 2: and their Rome and their Lin and their live Jews
Speaker 2: and they are live.
Speaker 4: What did Martin Luther know about these Jews back in
Speaker 4: fifteen forty three.
Speaker 2: The people seem to have forgotten now because the media
Speaker 2: is all my Jews.
Speaker 5: I want to ask you also about a very important
Speaker 5: issue of vaccine hesitancy. Folks who get most of their
Speaker 5: vaccines normally might be hesitant about these vaccines because they
Speaker 5: were developed so quickly.
Speaker 3: What do you tell those folks who.
Speaker 6: Might be saying, We're I'm going to wait a few
Speaker 6: months before I get this one. WI have not yet
Speaker 6: had your shot. When do you play to get it?
Speaker 7: I win the Jews and their lives and their lint,
Speaker 7: their line, the Jaws and their lin and their live
Speaker 7: and their lin, James.
Speaker 8: And their Ronds and their lin and their line, the
Speaker 8: Jeans and their lives.
Speaker 3: Back to the show.
Speaker 9: His message for all FBI CIV investigators or any district
Speaker 9: attorney or investigator or prosecutor, if you have one molecule
Speaker 9: of self respecting your body, and if you have a
Speaker 9: normal survival instinct and you care about the future of
Speaker 9: your children, and form teams of investigators to go after
Speaker 9: this son of a bitch.
Speaker 3: Nail this far nail on.
Speaker 10: You know what to do. Never forget what these Jews
Speaker 10: did to us and get them, get.
Speaker 7: Them, get them, the Jews and their lives and their lives.
Speaker 2: Jews have words for anyone who is not a Jew,
Speaker 2: derogatory terms meeting everyone else but us. So they want
Speaker 2: to harm as many Goys as they possibly can. And
Speaker 2: look at their talmud. Their talmud says kill o pemmle hall.
Speaker 2: It's your religious duty to steal from them, to bring
Speaker 2: harm to them.
Speaker 11: Martin Luther, the.
Speaker 2: Man who created Protestant Reformation, back in fifteen forty three,
Speaker 2: wrote a book called The Jews and their Lies. In
Speaker 2: this book he outlined toad code of Jewish doctors. Jewish
Speaker 2: doctors are here to poison us Germans. This is what
Speaker 2: he was saying in fifteen forty.
Speaker 7: The Jews and their line and their live and their lin,
Speaker 7: Jews and their lin and their live and their lin.
Speaker 8: Jews and their lives and their lin and their live shoes,
Speaker 8: and they are live.
Speaker 4: What did Larkin Luther know about these Jews back in
Speaker 4: fifteen forty three that people seem to have forgotten now
Speaker 4: because the media.
Speaker 11: Is owned by Jews.
Speaker 5: I want to ask you also about a very important
Speaker 5: issue of vaccine hesitancy. Folks who get most of their
Speaker 5: vaccines normally might be hesitant about these vaccines because they
Speaker 5: were developed so quickly.
Speaker 3: What do you tell those folks who.
Speaker 5: Might be saying, well, I'm gonna wait a few months
Speaker 5: before I get this one.
Speaker 6: Whistion have not yet had your shot? When do you
Speaker 6: plan to get it?
Speaker 7: I win the Jews and their line and their line
Speaker 7: and their line.
Speaker 8: Jesus and their line and their line and their line,
Speaker 8: James and their Ronds and their line and their line,
Speaker 8: Jeans and their lives.
Speaker 3: Back to the show.
Speaker 9: His message for all FBI CIV investigators or any district
Speaker 9: attorney or investigator or prosecutor, if you have one molecule
Speaker 9: of self respecting her bodies, and if you have a
Speaker 9: normal survival instinct and you care about the future of
Speaker 9: your children and former teams of investigators, to go after
Speaker 9: this son.
Speaker 10: Of a bitch.
Speaker 3: Nail this far nailing you know what to do.
Speaker 10: Never forget what these Jews do to us, and get them,
Speaker 10: get them, get them, the Jews and their lives and
Speaker 10: their lives.
Speaker 2: Jews have words for anyone who's not a Jew, yourrogatory
Speaker 2: term meeting everyone.
Speaker 1: Else but us, all right, So it'd be nice if
Speaker 1: maybe one of the fifteen times I pressed that Google button,
Speaker 1: I don't hear that it actually responded, but there's been
Speaker 1: something going on with that. I think I went, yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, whatever. It says. Martin Luther's view of the
Speaker 1: Jews changed dratically, it says drastically over time, usually in
Speaker 1: his reform movement. You hope that Jews would convert to
Speaker 1: Christianity once it was freed from Catholic or Catholic corruption
Speaker 1: the fifteenth But by the fifteen forties, after seeing that
Speaker 1: they had not accepted his message, his attitude turned fiercely hostile.
Speaker 1: Well slow down there, buddy, He read their own words.
Speaker 1: That's what made it a little concerning. It wasn't that
Speaker 1: they were enemies of the Gospel. They were enemies of mankind.
Speaker 1: So questioning antiquity is a little whitewashed here. In fifteen
Speaker 1: forty three, Luther published on the Jews in their Lives
Speaker 1: a long and aggressive denunciation. Is that really how you
Speaker 1: call it? Or a descriptive and rational, logical reasonable based
Speaker 1: on their own admissions and confessions that this is in
Speaker 1: fact how they believe and what they're teaching. They're young,
Speaker 1: that this would be a hostile force, a terrorist unit
Speaker 1: among any nation looking to see that nation his downfall.
Speaker 1: And in that particular instance, well yeah, there's a problem here.
Speaker 1: It says he accused them of greed and of corrupting scripture.
Speaker 1: The accusation or stating and plainly showing that that is
Speaker 1: the case, he called on the Christian rulers to burn Well,
Speaker 1: syneed guy's confiscated Jewish books, band rabbis from teaching, and
Speaker 1: expelled Jews from their lands. He argued that these harsh
Speaker 1: measures were necessary to protect Christianity, Christian society, and faith
Speaker 1: from what he saw as Jewish hostility. Luther's writing is
Speaker 1: carried enormously in Protestant Europe. His authority gave legitimacy to
Speaker 1: deep seated prejudices fueling described Yeah, but guess what one
Speaker 1: of the first places that they destroyed. These always co
Speaker 1: opted and maneuvered and repurposed, were most of the Protestants.
Speaker 1: Sex they become that which is which they find to
Speaker 1: be aware or antagonistic against them, or just plain understanding
Speaker 1: of their goals. Well, then they'll infiltrate, infiltrate, And how
Speaker 1: do you do that? Well, it's pretty easy when you
Speaker 1: have the printing capacity for money and Yhow so, we
Speaker 1: have a few things here today, ladies and gentlemen, And
Speaker 1: there's a lot of stuff here, and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of stuff here, and a lot of it goes together.
Speaker 1: But before we get too crazy out of control here, let's
Speaker 1: let's check in. See Aloha there, I am baby. Yes,
Speaker 1: haters will call it photoshop. That guy his name is
Speaker 1: Kenneth Wheeler too, the bodybuilder, but they share the same name.
Speaker 1: Can you not every fucking time I do this? Really,
Speaker 1: just spin out of control and make me have to
Speaker 1: delete you? Awesome? Thanks? Great, Let's see if I can
Speaker 1: bring them back up like I did last time. We
Speaker 1: gonna be good now every time. Oh there is somebody
Speaker 1: in here. See they weren't gonna show us that billing frog.
Speaker 1: How's it going? And a building? Me salute to you, sir?
Speaker 1: All right, well, I have to check back in and
Speaker 1: I can't just let us sit and spin. So something's
Speaker 1: got to be done. If it's d dust and fix it.
Speaker 1: If it's something else, well, oh, if it can't handle
Speaker 1: more than three live streams at a time, then let
Speaker 1: us know that so we know when other people are
Speaker 1: going on. But this nonsense is not effective for smooth running,
Speaker 1: you know, workflow, so we don't get that right now.
Speaker 1: Hey Stanley, how are you, sir? Brad sour? How are
Speaker 1: you sourder? Sorry? Coil opening Daniel good worker? Yeah?
Speaker 12: Thanks?
Speaker 1: Um. Yes, haters will call it photoshop. I mean I
Speaker 1: use the color correction, all right, yeah, and I put
Speaker 1: this up here too. It's been it's been once, maybe
Speaker 1: several months since I've seen this and I snapshot it.
Speaker 1: I can't find where the where their awards are anymore.
Speaker 1: I looked yesterday and Streamyard I mean spreaker, right, and
Speaker 1: I couldn't find if I had earned anything new, if
Speaker 1: there was anything new to earn. I think after two
Speaker 1: and fifty downloads, that's just like, okay, we're done telling
Speaker 1: you that you get anything, so out here you go.
Speaker 1: So yeah, two and fifty thousand downloads, but it's been
Speaker 1: four years. Some people do that in the day. That's
Speaker 1: that's in relative terms, it's not it's nothing. So remember,
Speaker 1: and this is what I had to look for. They chase.
Speaker 1: They spelled her name wrong because most people, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Sometimes they do it by accident, and some times they.
Speaker 7: Do it.
Speaker 1: To hide the source of the actual story. But the
Speaker 1: Saraya thing, I showed you this thing that they wrote up,
Speaker 1: and I said, doesn't she look a little too? I said,
Speaker 1: she looks pretty, and she looked, you know, why would
Speaker 1: the husband want to kill her? And then I said
Speaker 1: she looks awfully calm for knowing her fate. Well, it
Speaker 1: turns out everybody, do you know, do you know what's up?
Speaker 1: I try to give enough hints as I could. I
Speaker 1: tried to. It's a bullshit story. It's propaganda, and of
Speaker 1: course that would happen in Iran. And if we were
Speaker 1: attacking Yemen, then it would have been from Yemen, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. But they hate Iran, so it's Iran.
Speaker 1: And this is a movie. This isn't even this isn't
Speaker 1: a real person like in real life. This is a movie.
Speaker 1: This is a frame from a movie. And I've got
Speaker 1: to find where I started. There was lots of interesting
Speaker 1: stuff we're gonna look at today, but I gotta find
Speaker 1: where the Soriah thing is. Maybe I'll just go right
Speaker 1: into the Instagram. Let's do it that way. I gotta
Speaker 1: find where I said it. You know, I might actually
Speaker 1: be on this one. It would we go the next
Speaker 1: way with it. It's probably in here. Then I just, uh,
Speaker 1: I don't want to lose my spot. But I guess
Speaker 1: it's just the way it's gonna go. I can't remember
Speaker 1: if it came from the top of the bottom, so
Speaker 1: it's kind of gonna suck a little bit here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's see. It just jumped again. Let me see if
Speaker 1: I can find it a little faster. If it's not
Speaker 1: in this spot, there's our buddy. I can't find that
Speaker 1: thing anywhere. El So I have to like open it
Speaker 1: up and from there and make the screen zoom in
Speaker 1: for us to have a good shot of it. Did
Speaker 1: they ever jump it again?
Speaker 13: No?
Speaker 1: All right, well it's not in this spot, but there
Speaker 1: was a it was a it was a still frame,
Speaker 1: and I gotta love it up here. I'll just use
Speaker 1: this one. I thought that was interesting. You don't have
Speaker 1: to be a Jew to protect Jews. Yeah, you have
Speaker 1: to be a jackass to think that they require protection
Speaker 1: when they're the one's killing you. This just pops up
Speaker 1: in your feed now because of the You know, this
Speaker 1: dude looks like he either plucks his eyebrows or he's
Speaker 1: wearing makeup. But that's not the point of the video,
Speaker 1: so I still kept it for the information. Hey look
Speaker 1: he's got a definitely, Noney said, must be a great guy.
Speaker 1: Let me see if I can find this, and it's
Speaker 1: probably gonna be difficult. I like, oh, there must be
Speaker 1: something else in there. It's probably just the cover picture.
Speaker 1: Sometimes cover pictures don't match up with what content is.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, this is throwing acid into women's faces and
Speaker 1: the aftermath. Isn't that nice? Isn't that nice? Islam as
Speaker 1: a religion of peace, It respects women equally, stopped criticizing
Speaker 1: my religion. It says, yeah, none of them are good.
Speaker 1: They're all, oh here it is No, it's not though,
Speaker 1: But isn't this interesting because look at hold on, look
Speaker 1: at this. See this the hair, the color of the dress.
Speaker 1: And that's not this. That's Vicky Weaver whom they murdered,
Speaker 1: sniper bullet to the head while she was holding her
Speaker 1: ring to the face, actually while she was holding her infant. Long,
Speaker 1: how are you cheap? Same guy who was at Waco
Speaker 1: murdering people, scing back sniper. Let's see if I can
Speaker 1: find them one we were talking about the other day.
Speaker 1: It couldn't have been too far up because obviously we
Speaker 1: were just talking about it the other day. So much
Speaker 1: you lose if you don't go back on the check
Speaker 1: like all that. It's weird how it populates after the
Speaker 1: fact that you think you makes it impossible to find things.
Speaker 1: See like that wasn't just there on a fucking bitch,
Speaker 1: That was a kid, that was the ai Grandma. I'm
Speaker 1: a Jewish, we don't believe in hell because you live
Speaker 1: it here. Well, I don't know. I can't find it,
Speaker 1: and they spelled it the wrong way, so it makes
Speaker 1: it kind of hard to look for it. Let's see
Speaker 1: if we can do it in a different Instagram. Okay,
Speaker 1: we can use it. You can use this one search
Speaker 1: as I aya is how they've spelled it. No, if
Speaker 1: you can't, there's no way of looking for it. The
Speaker 1: search is don't let you search by see. Everything sucks here.
Speaker 1: It's like, oh, okay, we're talking about uh see. At
Speaker 1: least on your phone you can see content, comments or accounts,
Speaker 1: and here it just it's fucking retarded. So it's it's
Speaker 1: impossible to find anything whenever you want it, and so
Speaker 1: we will just have to go with hopefully you heard
Speaker 1: it and saw it when I showed you, because that's
Speaker 1: about all we're gonna get. Remember that AI check did
Speaker 1: you see that yesterday? And then you see this lay
Speaker 1: that's the rabo. We'll get into all this in a minute.
Speaker 14: It's just.
Speaker 1: Irritating when you can't find the thing. There's so many
Speaker 1: of these though, Yeah, it doesn't matter, it's not important.
Speaker 1: I'll find the picture for you right here. It's gonna
Speaker 1: say yeah, because you're fucking retarded. See now, they didn't
Speaker 1: give her a whole freaking story. This was a person.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna share this all for you.
Speaker 1: It'd be nice if I had the the stoning of
Speaker 1: Sarah m And let's go to the horrific eda Reddit.
Speaker 1: The background of the journalist proves an unreliable narrator, an
Speaker 1: anti ira Ira French journalist son of an ambassador during
Speaker 1: the Shah's time, is passing through a village and randomly
Speaker 1: is told the hush hush story through Soria's aunt. So far,
Speaker 1: that's already extremely doubtful. But that's not all. The story
Speaker 1: itself is ridiculous. Sarah is a perfect, sweet, loyal wife
Speaker 1: who is married to a humongous asshole husband who is
Speaker 1: not only abusive, but also visits prostitutes and is a
Speaker 1: shady business and is a shady business deal with the
Speaker 1: village that has I think is what they were trying
Speaker 1: to say, a shady business deal with the village. I could.
Speaker 1: He now wants to marry a fourteen year old girl,
Speaker 1: but needs to divorce first, so he, with the help
Speaker 1: of the evil I couldn't accuses her of infidelity, so
Speaker 1: they stone her and he gets sweet under age. This
Speaker 1: is the person's talking because they're retarded, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. Doesn't that sound like some sort of misshapen
Speaker 1: redneck fantasy of what Iran is. I don't know about
Speaker 1: all that, buddy. I don't like the redneck sentiment either.
Speaker 1: It looks like the most moronic way to marry someone else.
Speaker 1: First of all, he could just marry the second wife anyway,
Speaker 1: since it's legal and accepted to marry a second wife's,
Speaker 1: especially in village life in the eighties. And if for
Speaker 1: whatever reason he wanted a divorce, we are not Catholics.
Speaker 1: Kidding one is not that hard. That's also ignoring the
Speaker 1: fact that execution of a female from infidelity and eats
Speaker 1: four witnesses that actually see the penetration. But we'll let
Speaker 1: that slide for now. That was kind of funny. I
Speaker 1: don't even think he knows that he made it a
Speaker 1: little phrasing there, like pun intended right penetration. Let it slide,
Speaker 1: get it, and to give the Western audience more of
Speaker 1: what they want. The sons of Soria are on the
Speaker 1: try tribunal will give out the verdict and the father
Speaker 1: is the one who casts the first stone on Soraya.
Speaker 1: This fucking little bug. It's all such orientalism fantasy for
Speaker 1: the white man to get angered about how all the defensive,
Speaker 1: speediful women of the East are being mistreated even by
Speaker 1: their closest female, the closest male family members, and gets there,
Speaker 1: what the hell that's fucking gay with the anyway? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so this, I mean, there's there's a lot of there's
Speaker 1: a lot in here. That's not the only thing that
Speaker 1: gives it away. Though the book was written by an
Speaker 1: Iranian French journalists who heard it through the woman's aunt
Speaker 1: while he was passing through the village.
Speaker 12: None of it.
Speaker 1: So they made a movie out of an account of
Speaker 1: hear saying and that's that's it right there. That's the
Speaker 1: point that I'm making is that what we saw as
Speaker 1: images were being pawned off as something real and then
Speaker 1: they show the blood aftermath. It was a movie. It
Speaker 1: was a movie, and still framed that we saw and
Speaker 1: blurred or grainy, either because they suck at posting or
Speaker 1: because it makes it look more like a real photo,
Speaker 1: Like who the hell was taking pictures of that in
Speaker 1: the first place? In the eighties and with book camera.
Speaker 1: The director of the film is probably another opportunitist who,
Speaker 1: like the journalists, probably believed a film like this is
Speaker 1: the only thing. No, it's because it's propaganda for the
Speaker 1: oy Vays. Buddy, you don't look or think very deep.
Speaker 1: The producer of Sorayah film, Stephen A. Vt, also produced
Speaker 1: The Passion of the Christ its production company and Power
Speaker 1: Productions as such films as I don't know what that
Speaker 1: is anyway. And then these people who are anti Americas,
Speaker 1: the American propagandas most of the cdios, it's actually not American.
Speaker 1: There's nothing American about the media anywhere in any country,
Speaker 1: you dumb shit. There's there's no there's no nationalistic roots
Speaker 1: in anything that's that's spoken of on the media. It's
Speaker 1: all the anti nationalist sentiment of the Oivase, the banking
Speaker 1: cult that shapes your mind and your thoughts. It says
Speaker 1: there's been forty seven cases of stoning between nineteen seventy
Speaker 1: nine to two thousand and two for adultery and incest.
Speaker 1: It will incest, Come on, I mean, that's of course
Speaker 1: stoning the worse. Please, So there's not hundreds of cases
Speaker 1: like that. Also, the film specifically said it was based
Speaker 1: on a true story that and made it seem as
Speaker 1: if the villagers actively wanted to kill her? Are you
Speaker 1: kidding me? So they're gonna give you a Wikipedia and
Speaker 1: tell you this is this is the validity because Wikipedia
Speaker 1: said so that person's fucking retarded. He said, if you
Speaker 1: really wanted to find the answer to your question, you
Speaker 1: could have at least looked into the reference links of
Speaker 1: the page you shared. Yeah, yeah, okay, thank thank you
Speaker 1: for the Wikipedia of that. That makes it one hundred
Speaker 1: percent legitimate. Theach bags I don't really I really go
Speaker 1: and read it, but there's not a lot of people
Speaker 1: talking about it because it's just something random that popped
Speaker 1: up again, because it's you know, if you already have
Speaker 1: old propaganda, you may as well reuse it when you
Speaker 1: want people to get stoked and angry for war. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure that's probably why I'm seeing pictures of melted
Speaker 1: faces from their activities as well. Of course that's terrible,
Speaker 1: of course that's wrong. That isn't really the point, though,
Speaker 1: is it. And they think that the person who made
Speaker 1: this video thinks she's the bad person for saying something
Speaker 1: about about uh, you know Zionism and get the fuck
Speaker 1: out of our country. They make her out to be
Speaker 1: the bad person because guess what, it's a Christian mission.
Speaker 1: So of course anyone wearing one of those on their
Speaker 1: head and talking bad about the Jews gotta be a demon, right. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: I'm exposed by Canary Mission. Yeah yeah, No, Canary Mission
Speaker 1: exposed that they're a fucking Jewish front propaganda machine. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's what you did. Actually. And then for somebody
Speaker 1: who was asking search that josu dot net does exist,
Speaker 1: see search dot josh ud dot net does still exist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's see. Oh it's got to refresh me now. They
Speaker 1: weren't really asking if it still exists. I said, I
Speaker 1: wasn't sure if it still did. And it's a little
Speaker 1: on the slow side, but it's here.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm curious. It's Josh. It's probably just gonna go
Speaker 1: to a dead spot, right because it's going to be
Speaker 1: Josh your TV. I don't know. Maybe let's just go
Speaker 1: to f DJ. Yeah it is, so that's cool. It
Speaker 1: links to the FTJ Now how cool is that? Speaking
Speaker 1: of which, we wanted to be here anyway, didn't we.
Speaker 1: Let's see if we can get the thing back up.
Speaker 1: Uh where am I? Where am I? Well? Oh that's
Speaker 1: for the live stuff. Well I'm live right now, all right,
Speaker 1: come on post lookin's I pressed the button? Jesus Jonas?
Speaker 1: Now can I pause it?
Speaker 13: So?
Speaker 1: Yes, we are there, we go cool, and now I
Speaker 1: can finally pause it. No, I wasn't saying it wasn't
Speaker 1: working for you, Boiling Frog. I'm just saying it was spinning,
Speaker 1: so I couldn't pause it, Like I can't navigate away
Speaker 1: unless I can pause it. Otherwise, when it does stop
Speaker 1: doing it spinning, it's gonna talk, and it's gonna be
Speaker 1: talking at a different time in the video than you
Speaker 1: know what I mean, So it'll start playing it with
Speaker 1: volume on. So I had to I have to be
Speaker 1: able to pause it when I walk away from it.
Speaker 1: All right, So there we are, and I'm not going
Speaker 1: to be a jew condom. Ain't protecting ship for them? Yes? Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: you know it's not about that. Well, let's fut this way.
Speaker 1: I mean, everybody who wants to scream and point the
Speaker 1: finger is in the wrong already because you're acting hostile,
Speaker 1: but you're also acting like the victim. Well you know,
Speaker 1: hostility means you sound like you're pretty well capable of
Speaker 1: defending yourself. If you're so hostile and so demanding, it
Speaker 1: seems like you got a lot of energy. It doesn't
Speaker 1: seem like you're meek or meager at all. It seems
Speaker 1: like you're manipulative and demanding and all the things no
Speaker 1: one likes in a person. And of course I'm saying
Speaker 1: that to the people who do that stuff, not to
Speaker 1: anybody specifically. All right, so I could get rid of that,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna watch this right now, and then we're
Speaker 1: gonna get into some of this stuff. It's kind of
Speaker 1: annoying that I can't get the Soria thing. Let me
Speaker 1: see if I can do more. See you get it?
Speaker 1: These are all from the movie. It's a movie, see actress.
Speaker 1: So the people who didn't even use it original photos.
Speaker 1: So if they said it was a natural story, why
Speaker 1: is there nothing about except for a person telling a
Speaker 1: story to some journalists. Who happens when? Why isn't it
Speaker 1: convenient that it was a journalist, the person who writes stuff.
Speaker 1: It isn't it convenient that it made it its way
Speaker 1: to movie? Does anybody else find this a little weird?
Speaker 12: You know?
Speaker 1: I don't like the Patrick Beg David Bilbert talking about
Speaker 1: something here and this is a really lame and tame too,
Speaker 1: but we might throw that one up there too. Alright,
Speaker 1: let's watch this.
Speaker 15: Born in eighteen oh five, the story goes that fourteen
Speaker 15: year old Joseph Smith was visited by God and Jesus Christ,
Speaker 15: who called upon him to restore the True Church in
Speaker 15: preparation for the end of the world and the second
Speaker 15: coming of Christ.
Speaker 1: He later trans eschatological obsession with the end of the
Speaker 1: world hasn't happened in four million years, but it's happening
Speaker 1: now that there's humans around. Well, if there's away vas
Speaker 1: in our midst then yet maybe because they're trying to
Speaker 1: kill everybody. But aside from that.
Speaker 15: Bribed what became the Book of Mormon. According to this
Speaker 15: new religion, Jesus and Lucifer are brothers and their father,
Speaker 15: God is a human man with a physical body. This
Speaker 15: God is one of many gods, and he has multiple
Speaker 15: human wives who give birth to billions of living souls
Speaker 15: that are sent to Earth in order to learn how
Speaker 15: to become gods themselves.
Speaker 1: And that's why polygamy is supposedly okay, because we become
Speaker 1: Gods ourselves and then we can take on many les. Hey,
Speaker 1: become God yourself. Well, that sounds awfully free Masonic, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: The whole secular humanism, man becomes God. And supposedly, according
Speaker 1: to the Masons, you need to go through their initiations
Speaker 1: in order to get that. Yeah, that doesn't sound like
Speaker 1: a scam at all.
Speaker 15: But the most important Mormon belief is Zion. They believe
Speaker 15: that in six hundred BC they're Jewish ancestors fled Jerusalem.
Speaker 1: That says it all right there? Gee, why do these
Speaker 1: people seem like Lureen Cabalists so bad, so like intensely
Speaker 1: like Frankists in everything that they perform, right down to
Speaker 1: the Satanic ritual abuse that you find out the Latter
Speaker 1: day Saints are heavily involved. And oh oh because they're cryptos,
Speaker 1: got it?
Speaker 12: Oh?
Speaker 10: Oh?
Speaker 1: Because yeah, they follow freemus Freemasonry precepts. I guess you
Speaker 1: could say, through Joseph Smith's teachings. But Freemasonry nonetheless, and
Speaker 1: the elements of Francism come from the lure in Kabbala,
Speaker 1: but he puts it to the max. And then Joseph
Speaker 1: Smith comes along and adopts all that and Mormonism, Zionism, Christianity,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. At the same time you have these
Speaker 1: other people working through the the brethrens who are instituting this,
Speaker 1: and then Plymouth and Exclusive Brethren, Moravian and Bohemian or yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I had that right, like John Darby who
Speaker 1: gives you dispensation, dispensationalism, tying that to the Jews, and
Speaker 1: then you get Schofield later on. That was, you know,
Speaker 1: funded by Rothschild to forever give a handbook to pastors
Speaker 1: and priests to fuck up the minds of their of
Speaker 1: their flocks, built a.
Speaker 15: Boat and sailed to America where Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1: That's called co opting.
Speaker 15: It's visited in thirty three a d. Mormons were taught
Speaker 15: that they must find the new Jerusalem and.
Speaker 1: Kill all the freaking natives anywhere they go. This is
Speaker 1: actually part of it too, just like the Columbus guy,
Speaker 1: you know, murder as you go in.
Speaker 15: America, and we're told that it will be on Lamanite borders,
Speaker 15: meaning there will be Native Americans there to deal with.
Speaker 1: They expand right, and by deal with, they of course
Speaker 1: mean murder every least one of them, man, women and child.
Speaker 15: Did from New York to Ohio and Missouri.
Speaker 1: Those you can't find good labor work for, but found.
Speaker 15: It difficult to get along with the locals. After going
Speaker 15: to war with the Missouri militia, about ten thousand Mormons
Speaker 15: were forced to leave the state in eighteen thirty nine.
Speaker 15: They then went to Illinois and established their own city,
Speaker 15: which soon became one of the You.
Speaker 1: Ever noticed how Illinois. You know, you have Chicago there,
Speaker 1: but you have Illinois kind of just like a cesspool
Speaker 1: in a shithole and a huge, high active, highly active
Speaker 1: area for the insidiousness of shadow government. You get Lincoln
Speaker 1: from that area, who had a bloody water against Americans,
Speaker 1: murdering Americans and gleefully for the banks. And then people say, oh,
Speaker 1: he was a gupslove banks because of green Back. Shut up,
Speaker 1: shut up. Why would he kill them? Many people, especially
Speaker 1: in the South, wanted that man dead, and heymn nice shot,
Speaker 1: is all I gotta say about the largest.
Speaker 15: In Illinois, and was granted a charter that allowed them
Speaker 15: their own municipal court and a militia in eighteen forty one,
Speaker 15: over fifty years before Theodore Hertzel's first Zionist Congress in Switzerland,
Speaker 15: the Mormons ceremoniously dedicated Palestine for the return of the Jews.
Speaker 15: Also that year, Smith announced that the Angel demands polygamy.
Speaker 1: With an angel demands polygamy, everybody the guys are like yes.
Speaker 15: In three years he takes on forty wives, including girls
Speaker 15: as young as thirteen. Like the Masonic Order Daughters of Rebecca,
Speaker 15: they adopt the symbol of the beehive, a symbol of
Speaker 15: cooperative industry, and Mormons were encouraged to breed and expect.
Speaker 1: And it's not not an accident that the star looks
Speaker 1: like it's penetrating the whole of the beehive. It's not
Speaker 1: an accident. It's all sexual and many took child bride.
Speaker 15: In eighteen forty two, Joseph Smith, who.
Speaker 1: Kenny Wise as Serpents by Fritz Springmeyer.
Speaker 15: Fritz came from a family of Freemasons, was given the
Speaker 15: rare honor of becoming a Mason on site.
Speaker 1: Me, you could probably get Fritz on. I should go
Speaker 1: see if I can find them.
Speaker 15: Mean that he did not need to do any of
Speaker 15: the work along with other leading.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he gets in the Masons without having to do
Speaker 1: any of the the steps and any of the the
Speaker 1: humiliation and you know, humbling yourself to a bunch of dudes.
Speaker 1: So you shouldn't be asking for their acceptance in order
Speaker 1: to feel good about yourself, but you know, that's what
Speaker 1: they make you do.
Speaker 3: Church members.
Speaker 15: Smith was initiated into Freemasonry through all three degrees with
Speaker 15: the wave of the Illinois grand Master's wand within months
Speaker 15: thousands of Mormons were initiated into freemasonry and were using
Speaker 15: their lodge to grow members of the Mormon Church. The
Speaker 15: official Mormon Endowment ceremonies were introduced, and they reflected Masonic
Speaker 15: rituals right.
Speaker 1: And remember they co opted the eye, especially when you
Speaker 1: see it like this in the sun. Those were the
Speaker 1: Gothic Aryan symbols from a long time ago. This is after,
Speaker 1: way after they've already dirtied the waters of the Cyrus,
Speaker 1: changing the folklore of that, turning it into mythological beings
Speaker 1: who have godlike powers and not just noblemen and women
Speaker 1: and family. And they did this with the Tamu story
Speaker 1: and Babylon. Anytime these people get into a religion, they alter,
Speaker 1: they alter it. Anytime they get into any type of
Speaker 1: commonly held story, nationalistic pride, they insert themselves, eat and
Speaker 1: do two things. They give the attributes of their wicked
Speaker 1: behavior to these beings, fire them, and then make it
Speaker 1: into religion if it hasn't already been or a cult.
Speaker 1: Boris was simply the father of thor It's it's personified
Speaker 1: in an evil way in Egypt. Later by the very
Speaker 1: corruptive and destructive force of the parasite through the priest
Speaker 1: craft right, the priest draft the advisors to the leaders,
Speaker 1: as is now with Trump, and as has always been.
Speaker 1: You know, Ali, someday I'm just gonna put you on
Speaker 1: a spit and spin you under a fire low Carrosedia,
Speaker 1: and then I'm gonna feed you to a Haitian. Yeah, anyway,
Speaker 1: but yeah, this this uh the look the I was
Speaker 1: meaning you had to protect or someone's watching out for you,
Speaker 1: and then turned it to Survey Vince and were watching you.
Speaker 1: Big fucking difference. Right.
Speaker 15: In eighteen forty four, Joseph Smith announced his candidacy for
Speaker 15: US presidency and shortly after was charged with treason and
Speaker 15: locked up in an Illinois jail, where he was murdered
Speaker 15: and fell from the window with the Book of Mormon
Speaker 15: in hand. As the story goes, Joseph Smith was now
Speaker 15: a martyr, and his prophecy was proven to be true
Speaker 15: when the Mormons were forced to leave Illinois in eighteen
Speaker 15: forty six. They then began their exodus to the Utah Territory,
Speaker 15: where they massacred the indigenous population and found their new Jerusalem.
Speaker 15: The US government allowed the Mormons the freedom to colonize
Speaker 15: the West and expand their manifest destiny, but after the
Speaker 15: dirty work was done, polygamy was federally outlawed, and the
Speaker 15: once anti American Mormons became hyper patriotic, of course, and
Speaker 15: made the All American Nuclear Family their new public image.
Speaker 15: The entire Mormon religion.
Speaker 1: Being ugly seems to be a prerequisite for some of
Speaker 1: these ultra pushy religions.
Speaker 15: And it's based on the belief that the world will
Speaker 15: soon end and that a Jewish state must be created
Speaker 15: in Palestine.
Speaker 1: Right, Wow, how convenient in odd that is. There's no
Speaker 1: Christianity in this in this religion, it defies everything about it.
Speaker 1: It's not even like quote unquote gnostic by their very
Speaker 1: wide range definition. It's just craziness. They didn't even get
Speaker 1: into the part where it's not scientology. Isn't the only
Speaker 1: one that thinks this way, like you have your own
Speaker 1: like little world that you go to at the end
Speaker 1: of your life, and shit, it's it's hilarious and strange,
Speaker 1: and people say, well, how do you know, but yeah,
Speaker 1: they so, just like the Jews and this and this,
Speaker 1: and the Cabalists, especially the Cabalists and the Talmuded doctrine
Speaker 1: and all that is just to give the rabbis the
Speaker 1: power and that the law is the most important thing, right,
Speaker 1: So that's and the antinomialism it kind of comes from.
Speaker 1: Frankism is defying the laws of the Talmud because it's
Speaker 1: the messianic age and the importance of doing so to
Speaker 1: get to your end goals. So that's where Francism comes
Speaker 1: into it. And that's why they had the altercation mostly
Speaker 1: for spectacle with the Talmudic rabbis. So Frank would burn
Speaker 1: the Talmud, lots of books in that Talmud in public.
Speaker 1: I'm sure your books are kind of valuable back then,
Speaker 1: you know, because it's not like you just go to
Speaker 1: Barnes and Noble, So you know, the printing press I
Speaker 1: think was in the late fifteen hundreds, right somewhere around there.
Speaker 1: And he was around in the seventeen hundreds, but still
Speaker 1: it's not like it was widespread, like, hey, everybody's got
Speaker 1: all kinds of book knows it's they were more valuable
Speaker 1: back then, so to burn them it's pretty interesting. But
Speaker 1: it was all for show because then they later become
Speaker 1: in the I think it was a fifties three or
Speaker 1: seven they the frank has become baptized, and that's where
Speaker 1: you get your brethren from. And it's also probably where
Speaker 1: you get some of these guys from. Interesting how they
Speaker 1: find their way. They work their way into different organizations,
Speaker 1: create some but I also infiltrate or infiltrate is a
Speaker 1: good word, and they don't co opt until after they've
Speaker 1: changed the the you know, the majority of the power
Speaker 1: to sway within a group. Then it's co opting, and
Speaker 1: it's done so subtly that most people don't even recognize
Speaker 1: that it's happening, like they did with the Freemasons. Freemasonry
Speaker 1: itself established seemingly just for the pushing of the Lurian
Speaker 1: kabalistic idea of accelerationism, to bring us to the end
Speaker 1: of the world, to set the conditions to the end
Speaker 1: of the world, and to promote the Torah in its
Speaker 1: ideas of temples and why they need the third one
Speaker 1: so badly. Three temples, three world wars, three to three, YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 15: Yes Church, who identify as descendants of ancient Israel, was
Speaker 15: the only religious organization to officially support Israel's creation in
Speaker 15: nineteen forty eight. In nineteen eighty nine, Mormons founded a
Speaker 15: university in East Jerusalem. The LDS Church is worth billions.
Speaker 15: Today they are the main contender for the most Zionist
Speaker 15: Organization of America. And Charlie Kirk said that half of
Speaker 15: his team were Mormons, So.
Speaker 1: That's where I wanted to go with this, and I'm
Speaker 1: sure that's probably why he mentioned this, because we're talking
Speaker 1: about the Israeli angle as if only Jews come from Israel,
Speaker 1: and that's kind of the funny thing is they're everywhere.
Speaker 1: And there's also it's not just Christian Zionists that you
Speaker 1: have to concern yourself with when it comes to supporting
Speaker 1: this idea of mass murder and give them whatever they
Speaker 1: want for this main branch of the cult called Judaism.
Speaker 1: It's more than that. And Judaism is younger than Christianity
Speaker 1: because Judaism is defined by its defiance of Christianity. So
Speaker 1: for them to say, you know, they had all this
Speaker 1: other stuff in the past and history. It wasn't called
Speaker 1: Judaism back then. Then it was called something else or
Speaker 1: you know, whatever it was. But I'm called I'm telling
Speaker 1: you it's a Saturn cult. It at its very core,
Speaker 1: it was a serpent moon cult or serpent wolf cult
Speaker 1: if you want, But that was a Saturn cult. Moon
Speaker 1: and Saturn are pretty much interchangeable because it was the
Speaker 1: same type of doctrine. It was the negative aspects of
Speaker 1: nature that they were focusing on for energetic principalities and
Speaker 1: stuff like that, to bring into them and then get
Speaker 1: them to do things get work for them. So for
Speaker 1: people to say, oh, Utah, somebody said, there's no there's
Speaker 1: hardly a Jewish population there. Why would they do it there? Like, first,
Speaker 1: what what how many people do you need to pull
Speaker 1: off with that? But happened number one, number two trained people.
Speaker 1: There's no logic in anything that they said there. But
Speaker 1: it's also funny to say that there's no way Salt
Speaker 1: Lake City, Utah, or Utah itself.
Speaker 14: Is not.
Speaker 1: Somehow spookily in the hands of some very nefarious people.
Speaker 1: There's a zion bank that looks like a goddamn Q
Speaker 1: right across the street from the Salt Palace. Their hives
Speaker 1: are imprinted into the sidewalk. It's the Mormon beehive. It's
Speaker 1: also a Masonic beehive into this sidewalk. Every so many squares,
Speaker 1: I've walked them, I see them, I know that they're there.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is, so if you don't understand what
Speaker 1: a Mormon is and that they're ultra, super crazed out
Speaker 1: Zionists with some really strange beliefs, and if you don't
Speaker 1: understand that for military intelligence, the majority of the people
Speaker 1: who they bring into high level, you know, top secret
Speaker 1: clearance security positions are Mormons and Freemasons. Cooper talked about
Speaker 1: this because he had like two or three, like the
Speaker 1: junior meetings for the UH was. It wasna the guy
Speaker 1: Jacques du Moulay who was like the Do Molay youth
Speaker 1: group or something like that before he moved because he
Speaker 1: was a he was a military kid, so they moved
Speaker 1: every so often. Half my team is Mormon, said Charlie Kirk. Oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's being an ultra ultra Zionist. And if they don't
Speaker 1: like it. Oh boy, trust me. He couldn't have spoken
Speaker 1: his mind even though he did it on air. He
Speaker 1: wouldn't been able to speak his mind to people you
Speaker 1: even thought were close to him because their higher allegiances
Speaker 1: to this cult, not to makeing friends. They were there
Speaker 1: to keep him in mind and be smiley. Just because
Speaker 1: I'm of smiling at you and theyvered your trust doesn't
Speaker 1: mean you should tell them anything. There you go. That's
Speaker 1: a graduate Greg Reese's substack. But you can find whenever
Speaker 1: he puts out a new video if you're on his
Speaker 1: telegram group.
Speaker 3: Was Joseph Smith a Mason?
Speaker 1: Here we go?
Speaker 16: And if so, what connection does it have to temple
Speaker 16: worship practiced by members of the Church of Jesus Christ
Speaker 16: of Latter day Saints.
Speaker 1: People worship a so listen. Just like everything else. It's like,
Speaker 1: I have a very awesome, amazing friend who claims as
Speaker 1: far as if its ethnicity, if it is, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying I'm not validating that. I'm just saying it's it's
Speaker 1: their perspective or impression that it is in ethnicity that
Speaker 1: they are of Jewish Russian descent, So okay, whatever, they
Speaker 1: don't follow the religion they don't wear tiny hats and
Speaker 1: they eat bacon. So they are literally just like all
Speaker 1: American people who just happen to think that it's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm you know, part with Windian, part Irish, you know
Speaker 1: that type of deal. Super awesome, great person And so
Speaker 1: also in our lives we have friends that are in
Speaker 1: the Mormon Church. Okay, that doesn't say that the people
Speaker 1: don't do things because they need This is the strength
Speaker 1: of these organizations. The organization's strength is the pr that
Speaker 1: they receive from the people who believe in the goodness
Speaker 1: of their institutions. They need the people who are naive
Speaker 1: of the true nature of the upper echelon in order
Speaker 1: to make their publicspective persona look good. So they're just
Speaker 1: as valued, but just kepta in you know, sheltered from
Speaker 1: the from the inner workings of the darkness of an organization.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean they can't rise high in it.
Speaker 1: It doesn't mean that they can't be accommodated, you know, recognized,
Speaker 1: get recognition among their own. It just means that there's
Speaker 1: a degree of separation between the inner workings and the
Speaker 1: outer appearance. So it's okay, say this happens in Christianity
Speaker 1: this happens in Catholicism, this happens in Judaism, I'm guessing,
Speaker 1: and it also happens, I mean with people like their
Speaker 1: rabbis out here. It's hard to believe that there's like
Speaker 1: at the core of that it's a supremacy of religion.
Speaker 1: So it's really hard for me to believe that they
Speaker 1: don't harbor some sort of animosity for everybody that's not Jewish,
Speaker 1: no matter what level they are in that religious cult. Okay,
Speaker 1: but and why would that make sense if they actually
Speaker 1: believe in the God. So they want us to believe
Speaker 1: that God makes so many goddamn mistakes dot dot dot period.
Speaker 1: That's the way hold on the all knowing couldn't perceive
Speaker 1: the problems ahead. So he needs you to go out
Speaker 1: and slaughter the whole group of people. None, that makes
Speaker 1: any sense. Why is a god so interested in the
Speaker 1: affairs of man? Anyway, It's like I said it and
Speaker 1: forget it type of thing. You know, call me if
Speaker 1: you need something. Deal, Except they're not calling the same guys.
Speaker 1: They're calling some demon But anyway, the the Latter day Saints.
Speaker 17: Or the.
Speaker 1: Mormons, they have a church in this town, and we
Speaker 1: know some of them, and they're really they're really nice people.
Speaker 1: Of course they have five kids, because the Mormons have
Speaker 1: lots of children. They're not they're not practicing polygamist, But
Speaker 1: I mean that is that was a thing for a time,
Speaker 1: and they're still offshoots that I think still practice that.
Speaker 1: There was that whole big love uh you know, glorification
Speaker 1: of that idea on HBO for a time, trying to
Speaker 1: make the stand so it looks cool. Yeah, but why
Speaker 1: why are they so closely? It's when you really look
Speaker 1: at Mormonism, it's it's really a very extreme, extremely Zionist
Speaker 1: view of things. And what does that mean. It means
Speaker 1: that the folklore that's been completely taken out of context
Speaker 1: from the writings that they consider to be from God,
Speaker 1: which are not the most certainly are not this idea
Speaker 1: and belief of temples and destruction. Who needs to pay
Speaker 1: for that? Still? You know, Okay, Roman's over here destroyed it,
Speaker 1: but America has to fall because of it, even though
Speaker 1: they're helping you build your third which is probably only
Speaker 1: the first, because what the hell is these people ever
Speaker 1: built on their own? Nothing? It's pretty it's pretty easy
Speaker 1: to convince a bot bunch of blind followers to hate
Speaker 1: an attack anyone that you don't like simply by manipulation
Speaker 1: of the crapola in a book and then changing the book.
Speaker 1: It's not even I mean, it is a grimmore most
Speaker 1: of these books, but to even just misinterpret it on
Speaker 1: purpose and then share that and drive that into people's
Speaker 1: heads as that being the thing because you have a
Speaker 1: political agenda behind it. I mean it's and things really,
Speaker 1: you know, evolve so rapidly that they're onto their next
Speaker 1: scheme before even having the need to apologize for the
Speaker 1: misguidance in the in the previous they're you're, you're, you're,
Speaker 1: you're unfaithful. If you question it, you should be excommunicated.
Speaker 1: And some people's whole identity it's wrapped up in this.
Speaker 1: Doctor Artist was a Mormon slash Latter day saying fourth generation.
Speaker 1: Keep that in mind when you hear this, and then
Speaker 1: tell me if you don't think this is more of
Speaker 1: a cult and one of those things that people follow
Speaker 1: you around when you're a Mormon and you have to
Speaker 1: go everywhere in a suit for a period of time,
Speaker 1: like everywhere, and they need to follow your daily practices
Speaker 1: and basically spy and report back on you some you
Speaker 1: know about others you don't. Spies who spy on their
Speaker 1: own spies. This is the Jesuit formula, and this is
Speaker 1: the frankest formula to ensure compliance even when you don't
Speaker 1: think anybody is listening. That is very creepy, that's not
Speaker 1: very godly. Where's the trust? You want me to trust you?
Speaker 1: And what you say? Why don't you trust me?
Speaker 16: There could be some infusion between the similarities with and
Speaker 16: the differences between.
Speaker 1: Well, here's the thing. What what makes them similar between
Speaker 1: Freemasonry even though there was a direct relationship there. What
Speaker 1: makes them similar to Freemasonry is what makes them similar
Speaker 1: to Judaism as far as the Kabbalistic zion Zionist thing,
Speaker 1: and that would be the Lurian Kabbala. Not that there's
Speaker 1: both kabala's or there's a Cubala that was written by
Speaker 1: a bunch of bays in one section. Then there was
Speaker 1: the Lurian Kabbala. Was the which was his interpretations of
Speaker 1: said but was turning into turned into another Kabbala after
Speaker 1: his death by his followers Kim something or other and
Speaker 1: some of the other people. But what that was, that
Speaker 1: was the accelerationist idea of forcing the hand of God
Speaker 1: to come in here and fuck this place up. Give
Speaker 1: the world back to the back quote unquote to these
Speaker 1: people who identify as this cult. But in reality this
Speaker 1: is still a scam, a swindle on the people because
Speaker 1: Luria was an Ashkenazi Jew. Yeah, well that's the originals. No,
Speaker 1: they were the Turks, which means that they were from
Speaker 1: that Serpent cult far far far back in history. It
Speaker 1: wasn't an ethnicity, it was bloodlines from that engine cult.
Speaker 16: In Masonic ritual and the way Latter day Saints worship
Speaker 16: in the Temple of the Lord, let's explain. The term
Speaker 16: Mason or Masonry refers to freemasonry, a worldwide network of
Speaker 16: fraternal organizations dating back hundreds of years that promotes morality
Speaker 16: and service to others. Bullshit and yes, Joseph Smith, the
Speaker 16: founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints,
Speaker 16: was a Freemason. Joseph Smith's brother, Hiram, was also a Mason,
Speaker 16: and ami with.
Speaker 1: A name like Hiram, I'm surprised he was a freemason.
Speaker 1: Hiram a biff, Give me a goddamn break. Did he
Speaker 1: change his name or was he just born into which
Speaker 1: would indicate that his parents are also Freemasons of.
Speaker 16: A lodge in Palmira, New York, and their father.
Speaker 1: Joseph upsets me that all the a lot of this
Speaker 1: stuff comes out of New York. It's upsetting to me.
Speaker 1: Why didn't we take care of it before a god anywhere?
Speaker 16: Smith Senior was also known to be a master Mason
Speaker 16: in Cana Dagwood, New York.
Speaker 1: There we go, Cannadaigua. Isn't that far away from where
Speaker 1: I grew up. So he was the master mason. Hence
Speaker 1: his son becomes Hiram perfect sense as.
Speaker 16: Early as eighteen eighteen, while prophet and president of the church,
Speaker 16: Joseph joined the Masonic lodge in Navou, Illinois, on March fifteenth,
Speaker 16: eighteen forty two, rising to.
Speaker 1: Because after he already had his revelations, though they don't
Speaker 1: talk about it in the proper order here level.
Speaker 16: Of master mason just a day later, under the recognized
Speaker 16: authority of the Grand Master of Illinois. Masonry wasn't new
Speaker 16: to the thousands of Latter day Saint converts already living
Speaker 16: in and around Navo at the time. Although new to
Speaker 16: the faith, some members of the church, which even those
Speaker 16: within the ranks of church leadership were already Masons. Eventually,
Speaker 16: over fifteen hundred members of the church were listed as
Speaker 16: Freemasons in Navous alone, more than in all the rest
Speaker 16: of Illinois. In towns across early America, many elected officials
Speaker 16: were Masons. President George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and many signers
Speaker 16: of the Declaration of Independence were also Masons. In the
Speaker 16: years prior to becoming a Mason, Joseph Smith had received
Speaker 16: instruction from God revelations about eternal promises which God desired
Speaker 16: to make with church members. These promises are often called covenants.
Speaker 16: Some of these covenants, along with instruction about the purpose
Speaker 16: of life, are presented to members of the church in
Speaker 16: a ceremony called the Endowment held in holy temples.
Speaker 3: So does the temple.
Speaker 16: Endowment ceremony borrow from Masonic ritual. At the time, Latter
Speaker 16: day Saints in Navu, who experienced both Masonic rites and
Speaker 16: the Temple Endowment did notice some common characteristics between the
Speaker 16: two ceremonies, specifically the common methods of presentation and clothing
Speaker 16: of the participants. They acknowledged parallels between Masonry and the
Speaker 16: temple ceremony as given to Joseph. Based on their experience
Speaker 16: with both, they concluded the Temple ceremony was of divine origin,
Speaker 16: and consider that the ideas within the culture that surrounded
Speaker 16: Joseph Smith frequently contributed to the process by which he
Speaker 16: obtained revelations from God regarding the Temple Endowment as well
Speaker 16: as other subjects. Not surprising since God uses many means
Speaker 16: to inspire his prophets and help them receive revelation. The
Speaker 16: Temple ceremony was not an imitation or copy of Masonry.
Speaker 16: It was revelation from God. Yes, the presentation methods may
Speaker 16: have parallels to Masonic ritual but the content of the instruction,
Speaker 16: the covenants and truths introduced by Joseph Smith as part
Speaker 16: of the endowment were revealed to him prior to his
Speaker 16: encounter with Masonry. So what are some key differences between
Speaker 16: Masonic rituals and.
Speaker 1: The take Okay, before his encounter with being a Mason himself,
Speaker 1: but what was he raised as a raised with a
Speaker 1: father who was a Mason. You don't think that these
Speaker 1: ideas didn't trickle down into him and that he saw
Speaker 1: an angel. Maybe very highly self deluded and honestly believed
Speaker 1: in this stuff, could people get drunk with their own,
Speaker 1: you know, sense of self importance an awful lot, don't you.
Speaker 1: There's one person out there that I'm talking to you
Speaker 1: that probably understands what I'm saying, all right. So because
Speaker 1: I wasn't directed at everybody, was only directed at a
Speaker 1: person that I was thinking of at the time, getting
Speaker 1: a little get a little drunk on their sense of
Speaker 1: self importance.
Speaker 16: Down ceremony practiced Masonic rituals based on legend, promote self improvement, brotherhood, charity,
Speaker 16: and fidelity to truth for the purpose of making better men,
Speaker 16: who in turn make a better society. In the endowment ceremony,
Speaker 16: one of many important ceremonies held in sacred temples, men
Speaker 16: and women promise God to obey his laws for the
Speaker 16: purpose of gaining exaltation, eternal life with God through Jesus
Speaker 16: Christ and his atonement and this temple.
Speaker 1: What about the only thing that differs between the This
Speaker 1: is like freemasonry with the ability to mention the name
Speaker 1: of Christ, because you can't in the lodges. You can't
Speaker 1: even try to find or equate. You're not allowed to think.
Speaker 1: They said about this, to find a deeper truth of
Speaker 1: your religion, or to scrutinize and analyze freemasonry against the
Speaker 1: backdrop of your particular faith. As a Mason, it's forbidden.
Speaker 16: It draws upon the revelations from God for its content,
Speaker 16: though elements of the instructional methods and the clothing worn
Speaker 16: by participants in each ceremony.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they're talking about the apron.
Speaker 16: Share some characteristics. The purposes and origins stand distinct from
Speaker 16: one another. So is it okay for Latter day Saints
Speaker 16: to be Masons today? The policy is simple. Members of
Speaker 16: the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints are
Speaker 16: not prohibited from becoming Masons.
Speaker 1: They're not prohibited. There was a time where Joseph Smith
Speaker 1: said it was not okay. He wanted to be the
Speaker 1: one and the only.
Speaker 16: Nor are Masons prohibited from becoming members of the church.
Speaker 16: Latter day Saints believe that good can be found in
Speaker 16: many places.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but not in a place that breeds something that's
Speaker 1: antagonistic against the majority of mankind. It's a training ground
Speaker 1: of propaganda and propaganda mill for turning out people with
Speaker 1: a cultish mindset that sets them apart from all others.
Speaker 1: This isn't about bringing people together it's about galvanizing their
Speaker 1: members as a weapon against everyone else. Very big difference.
Speaker 1: And look, I'm sure it's because it's cheap artwork here,
Speaker 1: but there's a square on its corner.
Speaker 16: God loves all his children and wants them to learn
Speaker 16: of him and return to him through the endowment ceremony
Speaker 16: in his temples.
Speaker 1: It's like somebody wrote a religion for freemasonry. Do you understand,
Speaker 1: like this is very deliberate. I'm sure here his dad
Speaker 1: had had a hand in this, and that he was
Speaker 1: the one who presented it.
Speaker 16: God reveals profound the world.
Speaker 1: Not to Freemasonry, but Freemasonry made him an honorary for
Speaker 1: some particular reason. I'm sure it wasn't just for his dad,
Speaker 1: because even if it was just about his dad being
Speaker 1: a master Mason or a super Master Mason or a
Speaker 1: grand pooh bah grand wizard of a whatever doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: They still make your sons go through the degrees, but
Speaker 1: they didn't with him, you know, kind of like with
Speaker 1: Manley P.
Speaker 18: Hall.
Speaker 1: Here's the funny thing about Manley P. Hall too, It's like, well,
Speaker 1: he's an honorary thirty third degree, so they make that
Speaker 1: sound like he's somehow more special because because of his knowledge,
Speaker 1: they just gave him a gift. Every thirty third degree
Speaker 1: is honorary. You can't just earn it. You have to
Speaker 1: be you have to be selected, and therefore it's an
Speaker 1: honorary degree. Thirty second is your cap as far as
Speaker 1: achievements that you can make to get to a certain level.
Speaker 1: The thirty third is always honorary because it's always by selection,
Speaker 1: not by deeds.
Speaker 16: Truths about his plan for the happiness of his children.
Speaker 16: Joseph Smith and Freemasonry, Now you.
Speaker 1: Know, now you know, sort of what's this bunch? Lights?
Speaker 1: Alrighty cool? Jesus Christ. Larrity says, now, let's put this
Speaker 1: done down.
Speaker 3: As I've heard from another x LDS that there are
Speaker 3: a ton of explicitly Masonic rituals and imagery involved in
Speaker 3: the temple. Is this true or is this conspiracy theory?
Speaker 12: Nonsense?
Speaker 11: This is absolutely.
Speaker 12: Wow.
Speaker 19: So Joseph Smith, at some point around the time he
Speaker 19: was in Navu, was initiated into the Freemasonry, and he
Speaker 19: advanced pretty quickly through the ranks, and he writes in
Speaker 19: one of his journals that he was he was inducted
Speaker 19: into the ranks of Freemasonry and became a master Mason.
Speaker 19: And so the what happens within the Freemasonic Lodge is
Speaker 19: mirrored really closely to what the LDS Church is doing,
Speaker 19: not not necessarily in the Baptist for the Dead, but
Speaker 19: the other part of what takes place in the Temple,
Speaker 19: which is called the endowment, and the endowment is this
Speaker 19: initiation into the secret origins of the creation of the
Speaker 19: world and what happened in the garden and what trends.
Speaker 1: Again, we know what happened in the garden if you
Speaker 1: read the Edda, and it had nothing to do with
Speaker 1: anything Semitic, had nothing to do with well, it did
Speaker 1: the keld Semites that they were called back then who
Speaker 1: up who made up the eden Kites? And the eden
Speaker 1: Kites is just another word for the serpent wolf cult
Speaker 1: in Kharcemish, who had allies as far as Armenia and
Speaker 1: beyond around Iraq. They all came to fight against our
Speaker 1: ancestors when called upon, and they were considered the wolf
Speaker 1: tribe or the wolf The wolf totem was there. How
Speaker 1: they were defined because they would wear wolf skins like
Speaker 1: with the skin of the head around their like a
Speaker 1: hood into battle between But the sorcerer. Core of the
Speaker 1: cult were the way Vase before they were called Jews,
Speaker 1: long long time, a long long time before they were
Speaker 1: ever called that, and they weren't a specific ethnicity. They
Speaker 1: were just this group of black magic practitioners who were
Speaker 1: into child sacrifice, blood draining, all the things that you
Speaker 1: have heard a million times about what these people do
Speaker 1: to children back then, this is where it comes from.
Speaker 19: Adam and Eve and Lucifer and God. And part of
Speaker 19: this there are secret tokens and signs that are given,
Speaker 19: which is exactly what takes place within the Masonic loge.
Speaker 19: So there are handshakes, there are new names and passwords,
Speaker 19: there's ritual sodomy, and so for the Elies person these things.
Speaker 19: I'm just thinking now that maybe I don't want to
Speaker 19: continue on this vein offend somebody, because I mean that
Speaker 19: this is held is pretty sacred among the LDS people.
Speaker 19: So in short, and sorry for that to derail, but
Speaker 19: in short, yes, the connection between Freemasonry and the LDS
Speaker 19: Temple rituals is very very close, and where it came
Speaker 19: from was Freemasonry because Joseph Smith had been initiated into it,
Speaker 19: and historically chronologically the temple ceremony came post his induction
Speaker 19: into the freemasonry.
Speaker 1: But what about Robert Smith from the Cure? Okay, that
Speaker 1: one's down. This is eight minutes long. You know what
Speaker 1: we're going to do this one first, Let's let's have
Speaker 1: a look here. We're going to go into the the highly.
Speaker 1: Let's see. I mean, is this a toilet legitimate?
Speaker 17: Right?
Speaker 1: I mean it comes from South Park, It's gotta be true.
Speaker 11: I want you all to say hi to Gary.
Speaker 20: I'm really excited to live in this town. If shared
Speaker 20: all kinds of great experiences with you my new friends.
Speaker 20: Oh dude, what a little assholey scary?
Speaker 17: Hi?
Speaker 20: My name is Yeah, yeah, fag.
Speaker 21: Okay, now, who can tell me what year the first astronauts.
Speaker 12: Landing on the moon?
Speaker 13: None?
Speaker 20: Nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 21: Wow, looks like I don't have a class full of
Speaker 21: retards anymore, doesn't it?
Speaker 3: Children?
Speaker 1: Get it?
Speaker 22: Such a douche?
Speaker 23: Yes, somebody needs to put him into place. Go kick
Speaker 23: his ass, Dan, Maybe he won't fight, will he leave?
Speaker 23: That's all we care about.
Speaker 20: Come on, I got a fucking smirk off his face. Yeah,
Speaker 20: little bitch, All right, I'm gonna go.
Speaker 24: Kick his ass.
Speaker 20: Yeah, go da go Dad?
Speaker 12: All right, I got five bucks on.
Speaker 22: The other kid who went, Oh, here, do you want
Speaker 22: to kick a ball around with me?
Speaker 23: No, I'm I'm gonna kick your ass.
Speaker 20: Excuse me, I'm gonna go kick your ass, bitch.
Speaker 1: Oh, I get it.
Speaker 20: I'm in a new kid. Yeah, I guess maybe I
Speaker 20: deserve it.
Speaker 22: Dude, stop it.
Speaker 1: The other kids are watching.
Speaker 20: Look, do what you gotta do.
Speaker 1: I won't fight back.
Speaker 20: I just hope that maybe afterwards we can try to
Speaker 20: be friends. Someday. I'm going over to his house for
Speaker 20: dinner tonight.
Speaker 10: How did that happen?
Speaker 13: You?
Speaker 20: Katy's at not Days, but you're having dinner with his family.
Speaker 20: What kind of family is a.
Speaker 17: Kid like that?
Speaker 20: Hey, everybody, this is my new friend's Dandtan. This is
Speaker 20: my mom and dad.
Speaker 17: Hi.
Speaker 20: Sam, it's so nice to meet you.
Speaker 11: Well, it's great you can join us for family home meetings. Dan,
Speaker 11: that's what.
Speaker 20: We don't allow any TV and just entertain each other
Speaker 20: with music and stories.
Speaker 21: All right, go day, will be your guides, now, your gambles,
Speaker 21: your songs.
Speaker 12: All right?
Speaker 11: Kids, Now, how about we do some scripture readings from
Speaker 11: the Book of Mormon.
Speaker 1: The Book of Mormon.
Speaker 10: What's that?
Speaker 20: The Book of Joseph Smith. Who's Joseph Smith? Tell us
Speaker 20: the story of Joseph Smith again, Dad, Joseph Smith was.
Speaker 3: Called a prophet.
Speaker 18: Dun dun dumb dun dumb he started Don Mormon really
Speaker 18: and dumb dum dum dum dum.
Speaker 21: You know he claims he spoke with God and Jesus.
Speaker 20: Well, how do you know he did, dumb dumb dum
Speaker 20: dum dum.
Speaker 1: Joseph.
Speaker 11: I told my wife that you spoke with God and
Speaker 11: she didn't believe it. Well, it's true.
Speaker 16: I did.
Speaker 22: Where I was asking God if I should be a
Speaker 22: Protestant or a Catholic or what. And suddenly God and
Speaker 22: Jesus appeared before me and they said I should start
Speaker 22: my own church. You see you believe it now?
Speaker 12: Well, yeah, sure, Why would he make that up?
Speaker 18: Dumb dumb dum dum dum. And that night he's an angel.
Speaker 18: Dum dum dum dum dum.
Speaker 15: Ha.
Speaker 16: I am Morona, I am a Native American.
Speaker 1: But your skin is white.
Speaker 21: Yes, long ago all Native Americans were white.
Speaker 1: Cure sorry though true story.
Speaker 16: We all came to America from Jerusalem.
Speaker 1: I know that part's a lie.
Speaker 3: And we were here, we were visited by Christ.
Speaker 1: They were Gothagerians who u taught these natives a thing
Speaker 1: or two, and then they got all freaking crazy when
Speaker 1: when the gosp don got enough copper out of the
Speaker 1: minds and whatnot and reverted back to ritual human sacrifice
Speaker 1: and skinning people alive and ripping out their hearts and such,
Speaker 1: you know, because that's what you do when your God's
Speaker 1: leave you. Even though the gods were men, eventually my
Speaker 1: people were all quite often the gods are actually men,
Speaker 1: and every single time that they're the a person or
Speaker 1: a people is miss uh what do you call it?
Speaker 1: How do you what's that word? Mistaken for a god?
Speaker 1: It's usually a goth or Arian that they're mistaken for
Speaker 1: a god got ns.
Speaker 21: Well by the other tribe of Israel, and as punishment,
Speaker 21: God turned their skin red.
Speaker 18: Dumb dumb dumb dum dumb Joseph Smith, Well, it's called
Speaker 18: them prophet dum dumb.
Speaker 11: Dum dum dum he dad.
Speaker 23: How came you never told me about Joseph Smith, who
Speaker 23: the guy who's spoke to God and Jesus.
Speaker 20: We all stand God in Jesus don't actually speak to
Speaker 20: the people. That's not what the Harrison said.
Speaker 23: Mister Harrison said that Joseph Smith spoke to God and
Speaker 23: Jesus and they told him none of the religions were right.
Speaker 1: Oh diddy, well, none of the religions are right, especially
Speaker 1: not Mormonism.
Speaker 23: Sir Harrison said that I need to be following heavenly
Speaker 23: Father's a plan and I don't even know what that is.
Speaker 11: Ah right, that does it.
Speaker 21: I'm gonna go have a talk with this mister Harrison.
Speaker 21: If he thinks he can fill my son's head with
Speaker 21: wacko religious crap, he's wrong.
Speaker 11: I'm gonna go kick this. Mister Harrison's ass.
Speaker 21: Is mister Harrison's is a white guy, right.
Speaker 13: No.
Speaker 1: Pussy?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm gonna kick his ass.
Speaker 11: Hello.
Speaker 12: Yeah, are you mister Harrison?
Speaker 11: I sure am. My kid was just over at your
Speaker 11: house and he your stands there. It's so nice to
Speaker 11: find meet you.
Speaker 3: Well, thanks, This is how colts work.
Speaker 11: Karen just finished making the most amazing rice Krispy.
Speaker 1: Squares with chocolate frosty.
Speaker 3: Come on out of the coal.
Speaker 11: You gotta try one or six, you know.
Speaker 21: To be honest, I've never known any Mormons. I don't
Speaker 21: even know what you people believe.
Speaker 11: Who was this Joseph Smith.
Speaker 21: Guy, why did he believe that the Native Americans were
Speaker 21: actually white people from Jerusalem?
Speaker 11: I found them.
Speaker 12: I found them.
Speaker 11: You're not gonna believe it, everybody I found them?
Speaker 12: Found what?
Speaker 22: Another new Testament of Jesus Christ?
Speaker 1: I dung around all that was convenient.
Speaker 22: The angel who told me to look, Wow, inside the
Speaker 22: stone box, I found them magical seerstones. Under that, I
Speaker 22: found four gold plates written in strange writing.
Speaker 11: So where are they?
Speaker 12: Where?
Speaker 20: What the cold ladies and the seerstones? Where are they?
Speaker 22: The Angel Moroni appeared to me again, and it said
Speaker 22: that I'm not allowed to show the plates or the
Speaker 22: sears toes to anybody, because first I must translate what's
Speaker 22: written on the plates into English.
Speaker 18: Dumb dumb, dum dum dumb. He found in the stones
Speaker 18: and gold in the place. Dumb dumb, dum dum dumb,
Speaker 18: even though nobody else ever saw him. Dum dumb dum
Speaker 18: dum dumb.
Speaker 21: Sharon, did you know this guy, Joseph Smith found a
Speaker 21: new Testament to the Bible buried here in America?
Speaker 20: What are you talking about?
Speaker 21: Well, it's just that the Herizins are really nice people,
Speaker 21: and you should see how loving and together. Their family
Speaker 21: is I think there's something to that religion, and from
Speaker 21: now on, our family is Mormon.
Speaker 20: Hey, Sara, Oh here's the little girlfriend.
Speaker 25: Now.
Speaker 23: Hey guys, Stan, I remember you said last night that
Speaker 23: you'd lost your wealth, so I made you a new one.
Speaker 23: I look at them, aren't they so cute?
Speaker 12: To get it?
Speaker 13: So?
Speaker 20: Hey, I heard your dad came over last night. He
Speaker 20: and my dad talked about Joseph Smith. That's great.
Speaker 23: What happened after he found the golden plates buried in
Speaker 23: the ground, Well, he kept him hitting from everywhere like
Speaker 23: he was told, and then he translated what was written
Speaker 23: on the plates into the Book of Mormon.
Speaker 3: Dum dumb, dum, dumb dumb.
Speaker 21: What's this all about, mister Smith?
Speaker 26: I have in my possession an ancient book written on
Speaker 26: gold plates that it tells of Jesus christ second comedy
Speaker 26: here in America.
Speaker 1: Dumb dumb, dumb dumb dumb. Really that sounds kind of
Speaker 1: dum dum dumb dumb dumb dumb.
Speaker 11: How do you expect to translate it with these?
Speaker 27: With them?
Speaker 22: God allows me to translate the plates in English. You
Speaker 22: take this quill and paper and write down.
Speaker 10: What I say.
Speaker 1: Sit here, Oh, so kind of like a seance a
Speaker 1: little bit. You got your cuban in the center. Here,
Speaker 1: you're gonna be kneeling down on the floor. When you've
Speaker 1: got a table right there with a pan and the
Speaker 1: quill in it, you're gonna be doing what you're gonna
Speaker 1: be translating. It's very, very similar to a Masonic ritual.
Speaker 1: Or I don't know what Curly said he did in
Speaker 1: the Great Temple in the in the Great Pyramid. You
Speaker 1: know nothing to see here, nothing, no big deal, definitely
Speaker 1: not conjuring anything weird.
Speaker 26: The golden plates here in this hat, I need to
Speaker 26: have them somewhere dark so I can read the spiritual. Oh, okay,
Speaker 26: write us down.
Speaker 22: Appeared before the meat bits, and that's how the book.
Speaker 3: God Mormon was written. Dun dumb, dum, dum dum.
Speaker 11: Oh that must be the Harrisons.
Speaker 16: He Wow, what a great house.
Speaker 21: Well, come on in and sit down, everybody. You're here
Speaker 21: just in time. My son was having a little problem
Speaker 21: with our new religion.
Speaker 11: Yeah, well, that's just because he hasn't heard them. Best
Speaker 11: part about the Joseph Smith story, the one that proves
Speaker 11: he was for real.
Speaker 3: Marton went home to his fight.
Speaker 18: Dum dum dum dum dum had showed her pages from
Speaker 18: the book God Mormon. Dum dum dum dum.
Speaker 23: Dun Martin, how do you know he isn't just making
Speaker 23: stuff up and pretending he's translating off golden plates?
Speaker 18: You see, Harris Smarksmartzmert Smarts Marks.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna hide these pages.
Speaker 20: If Joseph Smith really is translating off of golden plates,
Speaker 20: then he'll.
Speaker 18: Be able to do it again, you see, Harris smarksmart
Speaker 18: Smart Martin risk dumb.
Speaker 3: So Martin went on back to Smith, said the pages
Speaker 3: had gone away.
Speaker 21: Look, I'm sorry i amount losing the pages we worked on, Joe,
Speaker 21: but I'm ready to write it all down again if
Speaker 21: you translate from.
Speaker 11: The place the Lord said.
Speaker 22: He is very angry with me for letting you take
Speaker 22: those pages.
Speaker 3: He is dum dum dum dum dumb, he said.
Speaker 22: We must now translate from the plate of me. Fine,
Speaker 22: so well be the same basic story but written a
Speaker 22: little different.
Speaker 21: Wow, God got angry with you, then you must be
Speaker 21: telling the truth.
Speaker 27: Dum dun dun dum dumb dun dum.
Speaker 23: Wait, Mormons actually know this story and they still believe
Speaker 23: Joseph Smith was a prophet.
Speaker 11: Well, sure, the story proves it, doesn't it.
Speaker 20: No, it proves he didn make it all up. Are
Speaker 20: you blind?
Speaker 12: Hey?
Speaker 11: Stan, don't denounce our religion.
Speaker 20: I don't want to be Mormon dad. Hey, that's only cool. Guys,
Speaker 20: you can believe whatever you want. Oh, stop it.
Speaker 11: That's another thing.
Speaker 23: You just wle people into your way of thinking by
Speaker 23: acting like the happiest family in the world and being
Speaker 23: so nice to everyone that you just blindsided dunb people
Speaker 23: like yeah.
Speaker 1: And again there's another dynamic to hear, and that is that,
Speaker 1: of course, every father is a They showed them drinking beer,
Speaker 1: they showed them being a dumb ass and easily manipulated.
Speaker 1: They just like every other show that's on TV. Weak
Speaker 1: fathers every time, because that's what they want you to believe.
Speaker 1: The one who is most capable of protecting the rest
Speaker 1: of the family you're supposed to have zero bond with
Speaker 1: because that's how they break up the family. You're not
Speaker 1: supposed to have any reverence or appreciation or love or
Speaker 1: care for that particular individual, no matter how much they
Speaker 1: care about you. And you get weakened by being a
Speaker 1: mama's boy or girl instead of health. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that mothers are bad. Sometimes they are. Sometimes they're really
Speaker 1: fucking shitty, And that's even worse. Like, who's ushering their
Speaker 1: kids into getting gender gender transformations? Is the fathers? Hardly,
Speaker 1: it's weak men allowing the woman to do that. I
Speaker 1: would like to know the statistics on how many times
Speaker 1: they give an adopted child to two same sex people,
Speaker 1: how many times they transgender that kid? You know, hey, stan,
Speaker 1: oh brother, it.
Speaker 12: Never retains Listen.
Speaker 23: I just wanted to let you know you don't have
Speaker 23: to worry about me trying to be your friend anymore.
Speaker 12: I don't.
Speaker 23: All I ever did was try to be your friends.
Speaker 23: Stand But you're so high right, you couldn't look past
Speaker 23: my religion and just be my friend back. You got
Speaker 23: a lot of growing up to do.
Speaker 20: Body, suck my ball.
Speaker 1: Fucking really. Uh, His whole family just tried to convert
Speaker 1: to your religion over very little. So that wasn't just
Speaker 1: you trying to be his friend, do you, fucking douchebag layer?
Speaker 1: That's manipulation again.
Speaker 20: Damn, that kid is cool.
Speaker 1: There you go, No, this one, that's this one. Now
Speaker 1: I'm gonna probably have to disagree with a lot of
Speaker 1: this stuff, especially Patrick Davil Patrick Bette David's continued and
Speaker 1: uh present in existence. I have an issue with that already.
Speaker 3: But with Christianity, let's kind of break that down.
Speaker 1: So this this is the guy who gives advice to others.
Speaker 1: And it's so funny how like the people who engage
Speaker 1: in the industries that are the most unrewarding for the
Speaker 1: people who are customers of it. This isn't he made
Speaker 1: most of his money on insurance. Insurance itself is a
Speaker 1: goddamn scam. Making it mandatory in any position, position, in
Speaker 1: any industry, or any any facet of life, to make
Speaker 1: certain types of it that just ensures business that doesn't happen.
Speaker 1: If you don't have an already corrupted system. You can't
Speaker 1: mandate something that's private business. You understand how that makes
Speaker 1: no sense. And it's a shell game. It's every It's
Speaker 1: like when people say that's an insurance scam, I'm like,
Speaker 1: insurance itself is a scam? Is it useful? Sometimes maybe
Speaker 1: it's a goddamn waste of your time, effort, money, and
Speaker 1: just another tax. Ninety nine percent of the time, Yes,
Speaker 1: our underwriters there to fuck you.
Speaker 3: Yes.
Speaker 1: So when you try to make a claim against it,
Speaker 1: do they give you the bare minimum or sometimes deny
Speaker 1: you absolutely absolutely you didn't have scroll insurance. It was
Speaker 1: a squirrel that bit the wire that electrocuted your house
Speaker 1: and caused the fire, and therefore it's it's not as covered.
Speaker 17: The biggest difference between Christian non denominational Christians versus Catholicism
Speaker 17: versus LDS Mormonism.
Speaker 1: It's no longer an act of God. It was an
Speaker 1: act of squirreld terrorism, squirrel terrorism. It was not covered.
Speaker 1: Acts of God are, but acts of squirrel terrorism are not.
Speaker 27: Some and non denominational Christian churches hopefully stick to the
Speaker 27: orthodox Christian faith. One God, three persons, father, Son, holy Spirit,
Speaker 27: deed and humanity of Christ, sinless life, a toning.
Speaker 1: Death on the cross, rights or blah blah blah, rector.
Speaker 27: An ascension to Heavi and He's coming back a second time.
Speaker 1: Yeah and yeah, you got to have that. I love
Speaker 1: how people argue their their manipulations over the people. These
Speaker 1: are just people fighting for supremacy of the manipulation and
Speaker 1: by having these arguments it only solidifies their believers that
Speaker 1: there's a reason to become more strongly a belief because
Speaker 1: of a sense of being under attack. This is the
Speaker 1: same idea that the Zionists and the world jewelry does
Speaker 1: to their people by constantly making them seem like they're
Speaker 1: giving them the impression. They manipulate their own their own
Speaker 1: judaic followers heavily, and they're constantly under the impression that
Speaker 1: they're being persecuted. And when they're they need a bigger example.
Speaker 1: The a DL funds a terrorist group that pretends to
Speaker 1: be white nationalists or where they you know, the whole
Speaker 1: weird you know, anomaly federal Federal Bureau of Investigation, anomaly
Speaker 1: of neo Nazi, and then they go out and they
Speaker 1: bomb or they get caught trying to bomb something. And
Speaker 1: then the ad L and all the Jewish organizations say, see,
Speaker 1: there's so much anti semitism, you're not safe. Give us more,
Speaker 1: Give us more and more and more cohesion, more galvanization,
Speaker 1: and more solidification of that people. And it's you against
Speaker 1: the world, everybody. It's you against the world, Jews, Jews,
Speaker 1: it's you against the world. The world hates you, the world.
Speaker 1: So they have to deal with that, in addition to
Speaker 1: their predisposition of supremacy religion and feeling like they're superior
Speaker 1: to everyone else. The whole system itself, the construct of
Speaker 1: that cult breeds terrorists, it breeds a radical and Christianity
Speaker 1: does its own thing. I'm talking about the industry, not
Speaker 1: the regular people. Just like I said the LDS. There's
Speaker 1: the people, and then there's the institution. The institution has
Speaker 1: some really dark elements that are very much like Frankism
Speaker 1: in LDS, Judaism obviously, and in Catholicism. So this idea
Speaker 1: of the fellows and Holy Spirit, Yeah, yeah, blah blah blah, Oh, Okay,
Speaker 1: he's going, he's gone, he's going to come back. That's
Speaker 1: where the manipulation is. That's saying everyone else was created
Speaker 1: to be a follower, and in the absence of the
Speaker 1: one guy, everyone's supposed to take the extreme amount of abuse,
Speaker 1: the epitome of the of the most extreme abuse from evil.
Speaker 1: They're supposed to just turn it that way and take more.
Speaker 1: Who does that serve a bunch of able bodied, strong
Speaker 1: men who should be protecting the innocent and especially including
Speaker 1: their families and other people's families of people that they
Speaker 1: care about. When you reduce them to followers, what does
Speaker 1: that do you know? It's a Jewish star right here
Speaker 1: magat right above. It interesting. It makes a bunch of weak,
Speaker 1: inner neutralized people and what does that do? It means
Speaker 1: that you have a whole world of people who could
Speaker 1: fix the problem. God has sent you plenty of solutions,
Speaker 1: and they've all decided not to accept their mission. It
Speaker 1: wasn't Jesus didn't have superpowers, Like he didn't shoot lightning
Speaker 1: out of his fingertips or anything. Was there any? Is
Speaker 1: Is it any time that he lifted anybody up like
Speaker 1: a Jedi and threw them against a fucking rock?
Speaker 14: No?
Speaker 1: No, In fact, actually they fucked him up and killed him.
Speaker 1: So if that doesn't work as a warning, and as
Speaker 1: uh prima prima trauma, first trauma, I'm sorry, your very
Speaker 1: first trauma would be the circumcision and the injections and
Speaker 1: the slap and all that shit from your doctor if
Speaker 1: you allow them to do that to your child. The
Speaker 1: other one would be when you're being told that, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: here's your religion, and uh, the best you can hope
Speaker 1: for is a brutal death, but don't worry. You should
Speaker 1: be grateful for it, because then you're going to be
Speaker 1: just like your guy Jesus. What The manipulation here is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: You're you're waiting. It's been about two thousand years now,
Speaker 1: still waiting. And what's he supposed to do? Is he
Speaker 1: supposed to be like what like a general and tell
Speaker 1: you guys how to do things? Couldn't other people have
Speaker 1: come up with a plan.
Speaker 17: I have.
Speaker 1: I have a plan, Like I know what I would
Speaker 1: do if I wanted to neutralize evil. You cut off
Speaker 1: the finances, you eliminate the weaponry, and then you go
Speaker 1: for the hubs of the most concentrated evil, the ones
Speaker 1: that make the decisions, the NGOs, the institutions that are
Speaker 1: drumming out this stuff and basically leading and giving the orders.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not that hard to figure out. And
Speaker 1: human beings you're gonna find out. I don't know how
Speaker 1: this works with other people. They don't see this. But
Speaker 1: didn't Jesus already tell you this, the very things than
Speaker 1: I show you do? The Kingdom of Heaven is within.
Speaker 1: He's but one person who did great, awesome things. But
Speaker 1: he wasn't supposed to be the only one. He himself
Speaker 1: wasn't a megalomaniac. He wasn't asking for a religion to
Speaker 1: be built in his name or any of that. They
Speaker 1: did that in direct opposition to him, because that's how
Speaker 1: we vas do. They seek the angle that they can
Speaker 1: manipulate others with. So what are we doing here? And
Speaker 1: he wasn't the first to come out of obscurity and
Speaker 1: talk about a single all father or father in heaven.
Speaker 1: That was the Gothic Arian people who talked about the
Speaker 1: benevolent creator father. And that was two three thousand years
Speaker 1: before Jesus walked the earth. If he did, where do
Speaker 1: you think that story came from? Came from our people?
Speaker 1: There's a lot of mixed there's a lot of blending
Speaker 1: of these two with the son of these two, you know,
Speaker 1: these ideas, And the son isn't some pagan thing. The
Speaker 1: son is the son. It gives life. It's a perfect
Speaker 1: since that which would be considered the giver of life
Speaker 1: to all things, which would be like a god, like
Speaker 1: a creator. It makes sense that would be the symbol.
Speaker 1: It would be hard to find another one that'd be
Speaker 1: as good that everybody can see and notice, recognize and appreciate.
Speaker 1: And if there was some sort of era where they
Speaker 1: talk about this purple candid and this purple haze canopy,
Speaker 1: of if there was a darkness era and Saturn was
Speaker 1: the sun, which makes no sense, then they call it
Speaker 1: the dark Sun. It just none of this stuff makes
Speaker 1: any sense to think that you're going to go on
Speaker 1: through history not defending yourself and that somehow being obedient
Speaker 1: to what exactly basically what you're doing is you're committing
Speaker 1: the greatest sin in the world by not defending yourself
Speaker 1: and by not defending your family. I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people weren't going to do that. They're gonna they're
Speaker 1: gonna do what they can. But the thing is, by
Speaker 1: and large, as a group of you know, as mankind itself,
Speaker 1: most people have been neutralized. They're not talking amongst themselves.
Speaker 1: They're not seeing the dangers. They're not disallowing their children
Speaker 1: to go to schools that have all these dangerous, horrible
Speaker 1: things planned for their children that they that they expose
Speaker 1: them to. They're not they're not they're not concerned about
Speaker 1: socialized the socialization of their children among lower broad children
Speaker 1: who come from shittier families that infiltrate their schools because
Speaker 1: of government programs. So even in you know, higher level
Speaker 1: education systems, not the non public schools, they still have
Speaker 1: the low element in there because equal opportunity. Basically, so
Speaker 1: you're you're paying for the tuition of your child, and
Speaker 1: then you're also paying through your taxes for the tuition
Speaker 1: of someone who certainly does not belong there to the
Speaker 1: bar is lowered because overall, if you have a bad example,
Speaker 1: a strong personality, bad example, it will create like a
Speaker 1: it'll it'll, it'll, it'll grow, it'll, it'll be transmitted to others,
Speaker 1: and then you have the more you have of that
Speaker 1: of that poison and idea in the minds of children,
Speaker 1: and the more of them that there are, it's going
Speaker 1: to influence even more and more. So you got to
Speaker 1: be on top of that. You got to be on
Speaker 1: top of whatever the other grooming crap they're trying to
Speaker 1: teach your children and the bullshit for them to hate
Speaker 1: themselves through CRT. And if they're taking any even a
Speaker 1: penny from the state, which obviously they are, if they're
Speaker 1: letting these other kids and then they have to teach
Speaker 1: the curriculum that the state wants them to teach. Homeschooling
Speaker 1: is probably the best option, and taking money from the
Speaker 1: state to do that means they also can stick their
Speaker 1: fingers into your life again, so be careful that you
Speaker 1: don't fall into that trap as well. Okay, I think
Speaker 1: I'm done. I just find it really silly that people
Speaker 1: who are looking around waiting for something someone that's Alex
Speaker 1: John's right there waiting for somebody to save them don't
Speaker 1: realize that they are the ones they were given. Everybody
Speaker 1: thinks that some things are supposed to look a certain way,
Speaker 1: like there's some dude with sandals on it is going
Speaker 1: to float down from the heavens and save it, save
Speaker 1: the day. Well, how have you earned it? You know,
Speaker 1: things don't come without a lesson, and you know the
Speaker 1: whole idea. He helps those who help themselves. You might
Speaker 1: be strengthened in your convictions and in battle for formations,
Speaker 1: you know, But for you to think that you can't
Speaker 1: you don't have to do anything. You can take a
Speaker 1: backseat and spectate and simply watch the world burn and
Speaker 1: the horrible things happen to us and people and think
Speaker 1: that you, as a spectator, have earned some sort of
Speaker 1: salvation or intervention is beyond me. No, you have to
Speaker 1: be taking the initiative and then maybe something magical will happen,
Speaker 1: or maybe you won't need it. Maybe you can save
Speaker 1: it for another day. Maybe you'll be just fine once
Speaker 1: you realize your own power. And that's what God gave you.
Speaker 1: Not against God to do things that He gave you
Speaker 1: the capacity to do for yourself, And it most certainly
Speaker 1: is against God for you to ignore that which you
Speaker 1: were given the power to handle your own together as
Speaker 1: a group, as a community, group effort, teamwork, building, bonds,
Speaker 1: building community, family, tribe, nation. These are the things that
Speaker 1: this cult hates. They want to They love disunion, they
Speaker 1: love de destruction of the of the idea at its
Speaker 1: core in the family, so that you don't have bonds
Speaker 1: and you can't and you make poor bonds because you
Speaker 1: feel the void. You feel you have a void, and
Speaker 1: you try to fill that void with a different real
Speaker 1: model that they will most certainly provide you. Why do
Speaker 1: you think people become radical idiots because they found a
Speaker 1: father figure or a mother figure and some other person
Speaker 1: who did not have their best interests at heart. And
Speaker 1: this is all by design, So just be on the
Speaker 1: lookout and please stop expecting some intervention from God when
Speaker 1: you're not doing your part.
Speaker 27: Now, I've got a lot of wonderful Mormon friends, but
Speaker 27: I'm sorry. Joseph Smith made some big errors, and one
Speaker 27: of the biggest errors he made is once again the
Speaker 27: identity of christ. Mormonism, in its fundamental teachings, teaches that
Speaker 27: Jesus and Lucifer are brothers.
Speaker 17: What.
Speaker 3: No, Jesus is the eternal god Lucifer.
Speaker 1: Again, just hey, no, that's not how the fantasy goes.
Speaker 1: The fantasy goes like this. See Jesus is the eternal God.
Speaker 1: I can't do this too long because it's it's just
Speaker 1: more misdirection and misguidance. No, they don't get it. They
Speaker 1: can't draw, they can't color their coloring book and draw
Speaker 1: their characters or make their comic book like this, we
Speaker 1: already made the ultimate comic book, because again, it's a
Speaker 1: comic book. It's not reality. It's what we believe. And
Speaker 1: then you know who gave you those ideas in the
Speaker 1: first place. Oh, oh those guys. Yeah, I would be
Speaker 1: a little careful what you thought about that. Over the time,
Speaker 1: nobody even goes someone else translated it. It came from
Speaker 1: a different language, and nobody speaks barely anymore, or had
Speaker 1: it even back then. And when the people argue that
Speaker 1: it wasn't originally written in you know what, do you
Speaker 1: call it Greek? That's also pretty funny. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of stupidity that goes on for us to believe that
Speaker 1: this somehow still has any resemblance two thousand laters as
Speaker 1: its original document, never mind us a word of God,
Speaker 1: but as its original document. And it doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you're talking about the the Wicked Torah or if you're
Speaker 1: talking about the New Testament. How much of that do
Speaker 1: you not think? You know that this has happened. There
Speaker 1: has even been committee sessions where they've augmented it, and
Speaker 1: yet it's still supposed to be the vert of God.
Speaker 1: Come on now, Council of Trent, counsel Niceea. Of course
Speaker 1: that was a big one. There was multiple times they've
Speaker 1: made changes, not to mention the fact that it's a
Speaker 1: translation and it's only as good as the translator.
Speaker 3: Created, an angel who fell, who rebuild.
Speaker 1: It, and the fact that it's not your culture, not
Speaker 1: your people, So why is it your religion? Your people
Speaker 1: have had already done this already, and all of the
Speaker 1: stuff that made Christianity good was well borrowed or stolen
Speaker 1: or co opted from your people. So that's why the
Speaker 1: Goths converted the Christian because it was it looked awful
Speaker 1: lot like what they had already believed in. Now they
Speaker 1: had a guy. Hey, you can have a Thor or
Speaker 1: you can have a Jesus. Pretty pretty damn similar when
Speaker 1: it comes to his importance, and you know his distaste
Speaker 1: for people whom he calls serpents. One was a serpent
Speaker 1: cult that was literal in real life, and one was
Speaker 1: calling people a den of serpents. Right, So whatever, Now,
Speaker 1: if Jesus had a hammer started bashing these fuckers over
Speaker 1: the head, I'd be like, Yeah, Jesus or Thor, I'm
Speaker 1: good with either, but I think I prefer in the
Speaker 1: time that we need to battle. Maybe it was maybe
Speaker 1: it was that the energy that flowed through Thor Adam
Speaker 1: that also flowed through that guy who everybody is still
Speaker 1: waiting for to come back. But that doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: it was only for one person. That doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: Jesus was ever a megalomaniac who thought that he was
Speaker 1: the only one. No, if God created that guy, God
Speaker 1: created everybody. God didn't come down in his If he
Speaker 1: was going to come down and actually want to make
Speaker 1: a difference and stomp things into the dirt. He would
Speaker 1: have done it as a god with the full power
Speaker 1: of God to smack his creation around a little bit.
Speaker 1: But these things, these things are not they're not really
Speaker 1: of him anymore because of the sick, wicked practices that
Speaker 1: they conduct. And what was the last part of that.
Speaker 1: That's probably why if anybody was going to come from
Speaker 1: sprout out from anywhere, then a person like Jesus would
Speaker 1: have would have been born near the group who required
Speaker 1: the intervention. He wouldn't have been born in India or China.
Speaker 1: If the problem that was plaguing in the earth was
Speaker 1: in a certain area, that's where the intervention needed to occur.
Speaker 1: So that should make other people feel good about the
Speaker 1: fact that, hey, maybe this wasn't even directed for us
Speaker 1: because the people who require the intervention means that they're
Speaker 1: the ones who needed the instruction, not us. He was
Speaker 1: talking to the people that were really freaking far gone
Speaker 1: off astray and going in the completely wrong direction, and
Speaker 1: some of them were being led by absolute unsalvageable demons
Speaker 1: who could not be rehabilitated and couldnot be forgiven for
Speaker 1: the shit that they've done. Those people who are leading
Speaker 1: the rest off of a goddamn cliff. So he appeared
Speaker 1: there rather than say Germany, rather than say the Americas,
Speaker 1: rather than say Russia or Scandinavia, because those people had
Speaker 1: their shit together. They didn't have to believe in a
Speaker 1: religion by per se and subscribe to something. They just
Speaker 1: had to not be wickedly evil, causing harm to children
Speaker 1: and miss misdirecting and deceiving more and more people into
Speaker 1: their sick, diabolical ways. So that's where the intervention occurred
Speaker 1: against Scott.
Speaker 3: They are not brothers, and there are other reasons that
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 1: But this is so, this is so mis misguided from
Speaker 1: the folklore that it's ridiculous. Like you, everybody has to
Speaker 1: read the Edda and then they'll understand how much of
Speaker 1: this they can just be like dismissed.
Speaker 27: Very hard to follow Mormonism for intellectual reasons. You got
Speaker 27: to be intellectually honest. And Joseph Smith nice guy in
Speaker 27: many ways, but a boil boy did he ever twist
Speaker 27: some of the teachings of Christ.
Speaker 1: Not the least nice guy in many ways, like the polygamy.
Speaker 1: I think he killed a guy. Yeah, it was a
Speaker 1: great guy. That's why he was pushed to his death.
Speaker 1: Out of a window. Right, everybody loved him and he
Speaker 1: was he was having sex with everybody's wife. I think
Speaker 1: that's how he ended up getting killed.
Speaker 27: Which is polygamy. I mean, you can't read the pliable
Speaker 27: and walk away saying polygamy is good. When Solomon had
Speaker 27: seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines, the Bible's not saying, oh,
Speaker 27: that was good. When David had a few wives in
Speaker 27: some concubines, the Bible is.
Speaker 3: Not saying that was good.
Speaker 27: That polygamy that's recorded in the Old Testament is not saying, oh,
Speaker 27: polygamy is good.
Speaker 14: No.
Speaker 27: Right at the beginning in Genesis two twenty four we read,
Speaker 27: for this reason, a man shall leave his father and
Speaker 27: mother be united to his wife, and the two shall
Speaker 27: become one flesh. Not the ten become one flesh, the
Speaker 27: two become one flesh. So God's purpose in creating his
Speaker 27: male and female list for this reason, a man shall
Speaker 27: leave father and mother, be united to his wife, and
Speaker 27: the two should become one flesh. That's not polygamy, that's monotony.
Speaker 3: Got it, okay?
Speaker 1: So and again that that alone tells you that this
Speaker 1: is not their idea because they don't understand or recognize
Speaker 1: by that that by that description what marriage truly is,
Speaker 1: because it's not you know, you're not leaving it, Like,
Speaker 1: what what does it mean by leaving your family to
Speaker 1: be united with this What So you're saying a higher
Speaker 1: a higher allegiance or loyalty than to your family. Well,
Speaker 1: this is a bond break here breaker right here then too.
Speaker 1: So that that says is that marriage can lead a
Speaker 1: pair of a son or a daughter away from their
Speaker 1: family rather than build it stronger with one person extra
Speaker 1: plus one. But that says is that it's basically leaving
Speaker 1: behind the most important bonds that you ever had in
Speaker 1: your life for this new thing that you're gambling on.
Speaker 1: And it's also this this is the way of weaponizing
Speaker 1: the idea of marriage and monogamy because it's not. It's
Speaker 1: not the detachment from another bond to make another bond.
Speaker 1: That's a ridiculous notion, very ridiculous notion. You're not you're
Speaker 1: not treating your family as if they're now deceased because
Speaker 1: you have a wife. That's crazy. That means whatever she
Speaker 1: said that that that that gives the power to the
Speaker 1: manipulator in the relationship, right it They this wasn't their idea.
Speaker 1: This wasn't the Jews idea they show as hell, wasn't
Speaker 1: the idea of the people rate in the Bible. Really
Speaker 1: the religion whatever that they're trying to create here did
Speaker 1: not have that at its core. Again, Gothic people brought religion,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, brought the idea of a benevolent creator, single god.
Speaker 1: The idea of monogamy or marriage and a family life
Speaker 1: came from them too. The idea of baptism came from them.
Speaker 1: When I say that all the things that made these
Speaker 1: other religions stand out and what they call the good things,
Speaker 1: that all came from your people, not theirs. So why
Speaker 1: do you want to put the ideas that originally came
Speaker 1: from your people through a lens of a foreigner who's
Speaker 1: trying to interpret it because it's completely foreign to them.
Speaker 1: Even the core concept of not banging everybody in an orgy,
Speaker 1: drug ritual and having a child sacrifice in the middle
Speaker 1: of it. That they hated us for teaching people agriculture
Speaker 1: and marriage. They hated it. There's bonds there that they
Speaker 1: then had to share or fight for supremacy loyalty from
Speaker 1: the people. They didn't like that the state in these
Speaker 1: days would be your master, your daddy.
Speaker 3: Within Islam. Go to Islam.
Speaker 17: When a Muslim sells the benefit of becoming a Muslim,
Speaker 17: what are the benefits?
Speaker 14: Hey?
Speaker 17: If you become one, here's what's going to happen on
Speaker 17: Christianity BBT snap.
Speaker 3: You know you accept you're going to having salvation?
Speaker 28: Great?
Speaker 3: What is it would becoming a Muslim?
Speaker 27: I think the best reason for a secular American to
Speaker 27: become a Muslim is because it provides structure. We started
Speaker 27: off this wonderful time together, Patrick talking about relativism. Well,
Speaker 27: if you think about relativism enough, you begin to realize
Speaker 27: that you can never look into your spouse's.
Speaker 3: Face and say you shouldn't have said that. There's no should,
Speaker 3: there's no walt.
Speaker 27: And you can't look into your child's face and says
Speaker 27: that would and say to them that was wrong what
Speaker 27: you did. No, if you're a more relative, it's all
Speaker 27: just a matter of choice. It's all relative.
Speaker 3: Well, you see, you try and live that out enough.
Speaker 27: You live in a family, in a neighborhood, in a school,
Speaker 27: you play on a ball team, you live in a culture.
Speaker 27: You watch a government go in that direction, and it
Speaker 27: is stinking, meaningless life is a sinking crapshoot, and an
Speaker 27: Islam comes in saying here, structure here, structure for every area.
Speaker 1: Right when you start people of a thing that they
Speaker 1: need naturally, and then you give them anything package that
Speaker 1: appears to represent itself as that thing, you might not
Speaker 1: even know what you're missing. You just know that you
Speaker 1: feel incomplete. And something comes along and sets off the
Speaker 1: little triggers of hey, this is something that I that
Speaker 1: you know, you you become really drawn to. It can
Speaker 1: still be the wrong thing. It can be manipulating the
Speaker 1: very thing that you need, but not be the thing
Speaker 1: you need. It's it's it's imposed. It's posing as that
Speaker 1: with a lot of different sharp lefts and sharp sharp
Speaker 1: rights that lead you into different facets because it's giving
Speaker 1: you a little bit of something that you need, that
Speaker 1: you need, but then steering you into into thinking that
Speaker 1: in order to have you must do this, and that's
Speaker 1: not good of your life. And I think the most,
Speaker 1: the most pure religion would be devoid of multiple laws.
Speaker 1: Cause no harm, that is the natural law. It's d
Speaker 1: unto others that same same concept cause no harm, pursue
Speaker 1: happiness without restraint, but cause no harm. It's pretty simple, right,
Speaker 1: And I believe there wasn't ten commandments when we were
Speaker 1: all done with those two books. There was only two,
Speaker 1: and they just came from the dude that everybody talks about,
Speaker 1: even though everybody reverts back to the ten, which was
Speaker 1: not for you. It was for the freaking maniacs. The
Speaker 1: maniacs who had to be told not to kill people,
Speaker 1: otherwise they wouldn't consider that bad. Love your neighbor as
Speaker 1: yourself is the same thing has caused no harm, because
Speaker 1: if you did that, then you wouldn't do harm to others,
Speaker 1: and therefore they would be less likely to want retribution
Speaker 1: retaliation against you. So there's a balance, there's a social
Speaker 1: structure there. And then the other one was love your God,
Speaker 1: two things which encapsulated all the other stuff. If you
Speaker 1: live your neighbor as yourself, you probably aren't going to
Speaker 1: kill him, rape his wife, have sex with his wife consensually,
Speaker 1: don't do anything else weird, like steal from them or whatever. Right,
Speaker 1: So all those other things that are laid out in specifics,
Speaker 1: because that's how whacked out these primitive brains of these
Speaker 1: maniacs that they call that were known as the Habu
Speaker 1: Shagas before they became the Jews. You get the point,
Speaker 1: all right, Cool?
Speaker 27: Those Americans who have become a Muslims have done it
Speaker 27: largely often for that reason.
Speaker 3: I yearn for structure.
Speaker 27: I yearn for order, because this is chaos moral relative,
Speaker 27: it's totally chaos.
Speaker 17: Well, I would say, you know, Muslim Catholics and Jews
Speaker 17: probably have more structure than Christianity does. There's a system
Speaker 17: on where you do. There's rituals, there are certain more sacrifice.
Speaker 3: To be one.
Speaker 17: If you want to be a Jew, there's a lot
Speaker 17: of sacrifice you're making. If you want to be a Muslim,
Speaker 17: there's a lot of sacrifice you're making in certain habits
Speaker 17: you got to follow. And I would even put Mormonism
Speaker 17: in there because there's services longer. There's certain things you
Speaker 17: do on Monday, certain things you wear.
Speaker 1: You know, you get fouled around. It's goddamn cult and
Speaker 1: they're very they're very controlling. Mormonism is all the.
Speaker 3: Deal structures you have to have financially. It's not just
Speaker 3: ten percent.
Speaker 19: It's like.
Speaker 1: Probably just as wacky as science, scientology, and for all
Speaker 1: the similar reasons that it's a good way to manipulate
Speaker 1: in a groom people for military intelligence positions.
Speaker 17: There's certain ways you go about the kids go in
Speaker 17: two years, learn a language, go to a different place,
Speaker 17: go to your what do they call it when you're
Speaker 17: going on your two years remissions trip that.
Speaker 12: You go on.
Speaker 1: Right, well, you know, and rabbis have said certain things
Speaker 1: before that made me my eyebrow raised because of the scientology.
Speaker 1: The a smaller amount of information I knew about scientology
Speaker 1: at the time, but I knew those things, and it
Speaker 1: was some of the rabbis saying that they're not even
Speaker 1: from this point. It's so basically they're saying the aliens
Speaker 1: and then YadA, YadA, YadA, And it just made me think, Wow,
Speaker 1: this sounds an awful lot like scientology. And go ahead
Speaker 1: and just look up if scientology is at present in
Speaker 1: Israel and whether or not there's Zionist friendly and you'll
Speaker 1: see a similar pattern with them and Mormonism. And we
Speaker 1: know scientology was a creation of naval intelligence because it
Speaker 1: came from el Ron Hubbard and that was also based
Speaker 1: on Crolyism. Lately, but he was into the crazy oto
Speaker 1: philemic shit that he was doing with a Parsons, which
Speaker 1: I think probably included so homosexual activity when they were
Speaker 1: doing the Babylon working.
Speaker 3: Okay, so that's fine, that's the structure part, but that
Speaker 3: can't be it. What else are they selling for one
Speaker 3: to say, yeah, I think that makes sense. I'm open
Speaker 3: to the idea.
Speaker 27: Well, I think obviously the Mormons bang family, which is great,
Speaker 27: obviously tremendous, and Muslims I think do a very good job.
Speaker 1: But here's here's the thing about that. You question Mormonism
Speaker 1: in your family and they they disown you, you walk
Speaker 1: away from their cult church, and they never speak to
Speaker 1: you again. There goes that, So who's the where's the
Speaker 1: bond really? And how how fake was their bond with
Speaker 1: you if it was really only to please their uppers
Speaker 1: in the religion. Imagine your dad is only nice to
Speaker 1: you because he wants to be seen as a good dad,
Speaker 1: where your mom is only gentle with you because she
Speaker 1: wants to be seen as a good mom from the
Speaker 1: community of other people that are of like religion, and
Speaker 1: she wants the uppers in that religion to recognize that
Speaker 1: they're creating an environment of a good family. But it's
Speaker 1: not about them actually giving a being emotionally invested in
Speaker 1: it or bonded connected in earnest with any of their children,
Speaker 1: because the moment that their children, who should come above
Speaker 1: and beyond all of those other worldly things, doesn't support
Speaker 1: their children when they simply wonder why things are a
Speaker 1: certain way.
Speaker 3: I'm talking about devotion.
Speaker 27: You pray five times a day, face and Meca, buddy,
Speaker 27: So get down on your knees and pray to God.
Speaker 13: So you know.
Speaker 3: There are some points there that are legitimate. I feel
Speaker 3: very legitimate. But remember Patrick.
Speaker 27: Read the Gospels and it was some of the most
Speaker 27: structured people that gave Jesus the most difficulty. They were
Speaker 27: called Pharisees, and they had everything structured.
Speaker 14: Right.
Speaker 1: They have the more complicated, the more laws, the more
Speaker 1: laws of man that they are spinning out of their
Speaker 1: own head. And they're not doing that because they're getting
Speaker 1: messages from God. They might self delude themselves into thinking
Speaker 1: that what it's about control, it's about not having the option.
Speaker 1: It's about breaking the will of free will, if that
Speaker 1: even is such a thing. Because free will is only
Speaker 1: as free as the influence that you are getting, meaning
Speaker 1: your desire and want to do something is completely molded
Speaker 1: by your environment. So if you're in this particular environment,
Speaker 1: you're going to be aspiring to do certain things. If
Speaker 1: you're in a different environment, you wouldn't have those impulses
Speaker 1: or those wants or that will to do So is
Speaker 1: there any true free will? Because you're not born in
Speaker 1: the vacuum?
Speaker 3: Get all the rules down. And they crossed all their
Speaker 3: te's and dotted all their eyes.
Speaker 1: If you've never seen a mountain, you wouldn't have the
Speaker 1: will to want to hike.
Speaker 27: And they were dead in their structure. Jesus comes to
Speaker 27: cause a revolution of the heart where we are overwhelmed
Speaker 27: by God's amazing grace and that changes us at the
Speaker 27: root of our being. So yes, structure is good, but
Speaker 27: watch out for structure because structure can, especially in religion,
Speaker 27: be deadly legalism, pharisaism, it can be got it.
Speaker 3: I saw one of these exchanges you had with with
Speaker 3: one of the students.
Speaker 1: Rather I think he came from didn't he come from Iran?
Speaker 1: Where the hell does this guy come from? And what
Speaker 1: is he? I mean, bet David? What does that make him?
Speaker 1: As YOI I don't remember, I don't know he can.
Speaker 3: Play this clip.
Speaker 17: I think I saw this on TikTok where you know
Speaker 17: he's going back and forth with you about Prophet Mohammed,
Speaker 17: about Muslim here rock, and then you're going back at
Speaker 17: him and you're walking away. I just want to get
Speaker 17: your reaction on this, and if he can unpack this
Speaker 17: for me, that'd be great.
Speaker 3: Go ahead, Ron to tell you the truth about God.
Speaker 28: Because the fawn is packed through in many places enough
Speaker 28: to us.
Speaker 24: A few places that believe that.
Speaker 28: Because I see the authenticity of the lawn, you can't
Speaker 28: show me two different versions that say these are both
Speaker 28: from God.
Speaker 3: I only see one version.
Speaker 28: When I see ten different versions, I fought and come God,
Speaker 28: how do we have ten versions? Did God writers or
Speaker 28: did the believer of God write?
Speaker 1: Did they change it?
Speaker 28: But when I only see one version and I can
Speaker 28: show you to change the authenticity, I believe it.
Speaker 3: Come on, you're sport enough here heard about Zaid. You
Speaker 3: know very very well why there's one version of the Kuran?
Speaker 10: I hope?
Speaker 7: Okay.
Speaker 3: Do you know what who's bonded banded?
Speaker 12: What did he do?
Speaker 3: He destroyed all the forms of the fraud that disagreed
Speaker 3: with the one that he chose through Satan Favi. Do
Speaker 3: you know the last time we introduced this happen what happened?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, here you go. Well, we're done with
Speaker 1: this anyway, because he didn't defend why there was ten
Speaker 1: different versions of Christianity or whatever. He only decided to
Speaker 1: go on too the youth. Well, these guys did that,
Speaker 1: which is a point on its own, but it's not
Speaker 1: it's not a it's a deflection. It's it's a misdirection
Speaker 1: from the question as to why yours is that way?
Speaker 1: All right, let's see we got some talk. We have
Speaker 1: some talking talking here. Hey, everybody over here on FTG media. Yep,
Speaker 1: I think we're on the right page. Okay, just dole
Speaker 1: a check in. Okay. Mormons worshiped Jews basically, Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: what I'm getting, Yeah, getting through Mormons used to run
Speaker 1: the military, CIA, and FBI. Those days are gone now though,
Speaker 1: well are they go? I mean, I don't think they
Speaker 1: round it, but I think there's a lot of them
Speaker 1: in there, and I think they're groomed in and pulled
Speaker 1: out of scientology. Mormon basically, colts that are tied into
Speaker 1: other things, anything that you create a good Zionist out
Speaker 1: of it, are going to be candidates for this occupied
Speaker 1: territory that they consider America. Oops, why's it going the
Speaker 1: wrong way? The Mormons also used to have hit squads
Speaker 1: called the Nickelodeons that would bring you out in the
Speaker 1: middle of nowhere, tie you to a tree, cut open
Speaker 1: your belly, and let you die with your guts hanging out.
Speaker 1: From what an old German told me, well, I'm not
Speaker 1: surprised by that. That's what the Bolsheviks did to people
Speaker 1: in Russia. And they would also nail their intestines, would
Speaker 1: tree enforce them running around it until they died, so
Speaker 1: they would unravel their own intestines. Originally, though, the Mormons
Speaker 1: were white nationalists religion, and we're not focused on Jews
Speaker 1: like they are now. I don't know where that comes from,
Speaker 1: because if this is from Joseph Smith, I would say
Speaker 1: that he was straight up the whole time into this
Speaker 1: idea of which is which is something that which basically
Speaker 1: comes from the duality nature of of livery and capitalism,
Speaker 1: the whole idea that say that says Jesus and Lucifer
Speaker 1: our brothers. That's saying that. That's another way of saying
Speaker 1: what the luring Cabbala says that God is evil and good,
Speaker 1: which I don't think that's true. I think evil is
Speaker 1: defined as the absence of that God element. So one
Speaker 1: is with and one is without. One is the the
Speaker 1: attribute and one is the void attribute. What they're trying
Speaker 1: to push the two together, and they say the profane
Speaker 1: with the you know, with the holy. And again that
Speaker 1: brings us right back to that concept of leering Cabalism
Speaker 1: and Frankism, which is what Zionism is. People will argue
Speaker 1: that a lot with me, and that's like it's there
Speaker 1: is no difference. Is that Francism didn't disappear, It just
Speaker 1: was renamed and it was absorbed into Catholicism and Christianity
Speaker 1: as their plan, Redfred, I don't think i've seen you before.
Speaker 1: Hello Redfred. One thing that might be in the Mormon's
Speaker 1: favor as far as what we have to do and
Speaker 1: has to be done, is that they have no problem
Speaker 1: rewriting their religion to suward situation, getting into fights with
Speaker 1: the engines. Just write them into your religion, need to
Speaker 1: keep a keke coff your back, discover a new magic plate,
Speaker 1: and rate them into your religion. The point being that
Speaker 1: they will initially be against us, they will be in
Speaker 1: the tank for the kake, but as we take profit
Speaker 1: out of that, they can rewrite that kake bullshit out
Speaker 1: of their magic book. It's still kind of weird though,
Speaker 1: and I wouldn't definitely not favor that over see. I
Speaker 1: just wish that everybody on at least FTJ media read
Speaker 1: this one book. I can't. I don't think I can
Speaker 1: attach a file here? Can I?
Speaker 14: No?
Speaker 1: I don't think so let's see. I think I tried
Speaker 1: this before and it didn't work. Let's see what happens. No,
Speaker 1: it doesn't show any of them. That's the shame. It
Speaker 1: only shows picture stuff. It doesn't allow me to attach
Speaker 1: like a n actual book file, which is unfortunate. But
Speaker 1: just look up the British ETA. Make sure you get
Speaker 1: the four hundred and fifty to two page version, not
Speaker 1: part one of three or you know, two of three
Speaker 1: or whatever. Get the whole thing. Make sure you get
Speaker 1: and read it. You got to read it, and when
Speaker 1: you get through with it, you'll realize there was no
Speaker 1: reason to have any of this other stuff. It's superfluous
Speaker 1: and it's not an evolution of what our people believed.
Speaker 1: It's an over complication of what our people believed. And
Speaker 1: New I mean, nosis came long before there was ever
Speaker 1: a period where they talked about gnostics. Nosis is something
Speaker 1: that's in hindered with those who have a spirit of
Speaker 1: God that they communicate with. That's what gnosis is. So
Speaker 1: when you are you don't have to always know the answer,
Speaker 1: but you always have the sense of knowing that something's
Speaker 1: right or something's wrong right if you have this thing
Speaker 1: within you. If you don't have that thing with then
Speaker 1: you you don't even question whether it's right or wrong,
Speaker 1: and you don't really care. And that's that's a big
Speaker 1: difference between us and them when it comes to when
Speaker 1: I say us, I just simply mean like mankind versus them.
Speaker 1: I think of those who wish to harm and eliminate mankind,
Speaker 1: whomever those people may be at any given time, or
Speaker 1: whatever those things that look like people may be where
Speaker 1: you know, whatever, whatever dibick or gin or demon may
Speaker 1: be actually operating the mechanics, pulling the levers and pressing
Speaker 1: the buttons and turning the wheel. Let's see what we
Speaker 1: got out here, Stanley Hillo, Dan my friend Years, we're going, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: so I think we're worried about here. They have to
Speaker 1: be selected by other thirty third degree for masons to
Speaker 1: become one that's correct. What's up with the tattooed monkey
Speaker 1: guy on your thumbnail? Oh yeah, he's coming up, he's
Speaker 1: coming up. Thanks for reminding me, Uh, fair play, I
Speaker 1: was thinking the same thing. Oh okay, yeah, okay, tell
Speaker 1: them poor hand frankism. That's funny. Yeah yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: let's see. I don't usually see whether very well is
Speaker 1: on Twitter making comments, but I'll try right now. So
Speaker 1: if you're on Twitter and you're not making comments, you
Speaker 1: should do it right now. Do you want them red?
Speaker 1: If you want on green? Nope, nobody's saying anything. So
Speaker 1: I will hi and you just there you go. And
Speaker 1: uh yeah, I do have a Twitter, but it's not
Speaker 1: under this name because that name was deleted off of
Speaker 1: Twitter and I couldn't never put on a new Twitter
Speaker 1: account on my phone any phone that had the same
Speaker 1: number or the same IP address. Isn't that that They
Speaker 1: really didn't want me to come back. So I changed
Speaker 1: the name and I used a different person's phone number,
Speaker 1: and so here I am. But it was all or not.
Speaker 1: There's like no real point in being here, like really
Speaker 1: at all. So yeah, after I think next month, they
Speaker 1: don't get my money anymore. So there you go, Red,
Speaker 1: ice TV. There's a little bit of weirdness going on
Speaker 1: with them lately too. I questioned their loyalties anyhow, not
Speaker 1: a point to be made in this show. But the
Speaker 1: next phase of this discussion, we must go to a
Speaker 1: video from two years ago. What time is it now?
Speaker 1: We've been in an on for two hours already for
Speaker 1: the things go fast, fast, really fast. So support your
Speaker 1: local bullbrus are over on FTJ if you can. That'd
Speaker 1: be super sweet. And uh, that don't mean in a
Speaker 1: sweet gay way, but I just mean like it would
Speaker 1: be nice, thank you. And then over here we got
Speaker 1: going on. Oh cool, we're up to fifty followers now
Speaker 1: over on fifty on the Doctor Glidden one, almost five
Speaker 1: thousand on the this one here all right, and we
Speaker 1: were actually climbing pretty fast. On YouTube. YouTube deleted my
Speaker 1: last video. It put it unblocked for those of you
Speaker 1: looking for it on YouTube. Fifty three people saw it
Speaker 1: and then it was blocked and taken down because of
Speaker 1: that song. I told you they were going to do it.
Speaker 1: Surprise your dad and one other thing that they copyright
Speaker 1: slap me for. So you're not allowed to share things.
Speaker 1: There's no there's no such thing as fair use when
Speaker 1: it comes to when it comes to YouTube and these
Speaker 1: demon oivs who run fucking music and the ones that
Speaker 1: make all this anyway, it's not protecting anything to just
Speaker 1: use it and more people might be interested in the
Speaker 1: song and go download it, especially you're only using the
Speaker 1: part like what does that do? It doesn't do anything special,
Speaker 1: you know, it doesn't like it's not like, oh ha,
Speaker 1: look at me, I took advantage of that artist. No
Speaker 1: you didn't. Song is like from the nineties. They made
Speaker 1: their money on it already, and the fact that I'm
Speaker 1: showing other people that just means more people can be
Speaker 1: interested in it. Okay, So if you're on Rumble or
Speaker 1: if you're on FTJ Media, you can hit my website
Speaker 1: right here, my Patreon, which I highly recommend to get
Speaker 1: on because I'm doing exclusives, including the Stupieter's rundown. So
Speaker 1: here's the thing. Ellie Widdell, Yes, yes, British Ellie Woddell
Speaker 1: Synthetic will Yes. Absolutely. I was going to try to
Speaker 1: put in the chat. I've talked about it very many times.
Speaker 1: I went through the whole look and Reddit, but I
Speaker 1: did additional things in the beginning of the videos. So
Speaker 1: I'm going to probably do that all over again as
Speaker 1: well and put it on the FTG Media Premium for
Speaker 1: the people who give day five bucks a month, and
Speaker 1: I put it on there, and I'm also going to
Speaker 1: put it on Patreon saying it. So that's one other
Speaker 1: reason I had to get on the Patreon. But the
Speaker 1: other one is going to be there's exclusive content that
Speaker 1: goes on there, and then you get all my videos
Speaker 1: in podcast form without the commercials that you would have
Speaker 1: to have to listen to or skip over on a
Speaker 1: podcast player like spreaker or Spotify. That deleted me, so
Speaker 1: don't look for me there, But I'm on Apple podcast
Speaker 1: all right. So that's the Patreon. This is my website.
Speaker 1: That's my website again. That's doctor Glinnen's direct link. That's
Speaker 1: the code for twenty five percent off. And then here
Speaker 1: is banned by Amazon dot Com. Use code bb Bravo
Speaker 1: Bravo Dan, and you go here in anything you want,
Speaker 1: use bb DAN and get ten percent off. All right,
Speaker 1: good times had by all. And yeah, I wish I
Speaker 1: could share it with you, but if you if you
Speaker 1: want to look it up, I'll show you how quick
Speaker 1: it is. Right, you can just go like this much.
Speaker 1: Let's see, hopefully you'll go right to where I'm just
Speaker 1: waiting for it. No, see, this is not correct. If
Speaker 1: you get this, there's a better way, so just keep looking.
Speaker 1: Sessa's version three complete. It's not as easy to find
Speaker 1: it as it used to be. But this is the
Speaker 1: proper cover near It's just it's just the sun symbol kids.
Speaker 1: But yes, it's four hundred fifty one pages subscribed. Let's
Speaker 1: see if they lead do it. I don't know, it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, but you could try to do it through there.
Speaker 1: M hm. So if you look at if you go
Speaker 1: into and I've done I've done this before and it
Speaker 1: was pretty awesome. I went into Enoch on Brady on
Speaker 1: dott Ai or whatever the hell it is, and I
Speaker 1: looked for made Library of Agatha. Maybe, oh, there it is.
Speaker 1: There you go four and fifty two pages. It's the
Speaker 1: one that says library of Agatha here. Let me it's
Speaker 1: really long. I'll go ahead and put this in the
Speaker 1: in the chat here. Tell me if tell me if
Speaker 1: that link works for you, and I'll put that out
Speaker 1: over on rumble too and YouTube. I set to find
Speaker 1: did I make one yet? I don't think I did,
Speaker 1: Let's just do a new one. So you say, so
Speaker 1: many tabs, But there's a lot of things that are
Speaker 1: piling up that I haven't gotten around to yet, so
Speaker 1: I gotta get into it soon soon ish, Well, not
Speaker 1: before I do that the Secrets of Why as opposed
Speaker 1: to quantum insanity. I need to open that one do okay? No,
Speaker 1: what was I doing?
Speaker 14: Oh?
Speaker 10: Yeah, me?
Speaker 1: So we're at one point oh four. We were at
Speaker 1: one point oh two, one point oh one, and then
Speaker 1: one point oh two, so that means we have one
Speaker 1: thousand and forty people. Now that's crazy. That's crazy. Good.
Speaker 1: Let's get it to five K. Let's even get the
Speaker 1: five k relatively short period of time. That'd be awesome.
Speaker 1: All right, So here, let's see if this pace works.
Speaker 12: And maybe it won't.
Speaker 1: I don't know. You know how they do the abbreviation
Speaker 1: things on YouTube, So hopefully it works out for you guys.
Speaker 1: I just like my own stuff because you know, it
Speaker 1: gives you one more Like that's one more alike you're
Speaker 1: leaving on the table there, all right. So this is
Speaker 1: the British DA and I read the the beginning of
Speaker 1: this a couple of times. But since there's interest here
Speaker 1: let me let me go ahead and do this too.
Speaker 1: So it's Library of Agartha. But just look for as
Speaker 1: the British EDA l A Withdell. If you don't have
Speaker 1: the link, yeah, whatever, right, and then you should be
Speaker 1: able to find this one. Now let's let's do this. Now,
Speaker 1: let's use Google because most people do. And we'll say
Speaker 1: make this is what I was discussing with what's the
Speaker 1: name with Davis last Tuesday. And by the way, we'll
Speaker 1: be back together again next Tuesday. Yes, I'll be there.
Speaker 1: He starts at five o'clock my time. I'll be joining
Speaker 1: you guys at six pm. And that's got to be
Speaker 1: mindful of when the top clock's changed, because they don't
Speaker 1: change for us. But I just have to take it,
Speaker 1: you know. I have to adjust the time accordingly with
Speaker 1: how that affects everybody else. Makers of Civilization in Race
Speaker 1: and History is the full title boom. So there's two
Speaker 1: Internet archives. Once just to make sure, says about three
Speaker 1: hundred three thousand or thirty three eighty BC reconstructed from
Speaker 1: Babylon Eadrician Italian into Okay, let's see which this one
Speaker 1: should be about seven hundred and thirty Okay, that one
Speaker 1: looks like it's an okay copy. I yeah, ooh, I
Speaker 1: don't know. Somebody underlined this one. Let's let's see if
Speaker 1: there's a better one. Is this one different? Yes? Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is the one I have. It's stand from Del High,
Speaker 1: the Del High University. It's seven hundred and eighty two
Speaker 1: pages too, so I'm not sure what what constitutes the
Speaker 1: extra pages, but it does have extra pages. So the
Speaker 1: way to get out of this nonsense isn't just to
Speaker 1: do that, like you can do that, but you can
Speaker 1: also just go ahead and download the PDF and just
Speaker 1: go clickly clack, and then if you have a you
Speaker 1: can do this on your phone too. If you're like
Speaker 1: me who likes a lot like read things when they're
Speaker 1: doing other things like the elliptical, there's this thing called
Speaker 1: read Era and it helps you read PDFs. You can also,
Speaker 1: if you're not aware of this, in a kindle, you
Speaker 1: can add PDFs to your kindle. Now, they're only gonna
Speaker 1: be There're only going to be available on whatever device
Speaker 1: you're running that kindle app on, So don't expect, like
Speaker 1: if you put it on on your phone, that you'll
Speaker 1: be able to access it on your computer. It's not
Speaker 1: like when you get a Kindle book in your library,
Speaker 1: So it's it's site specific, basically like device specific. So
Speaker 1: if you upload it on your phone and you're reading
Speaker 1: it through your Kindle, expect to also have to if
Speaker 1: you want to continue to read on your computer or whatever.
Speaker 1: If you want to do a presentation while you're doing,
Speaker 1: you like a livestream, you're going to want to also
Speaker 1: upload it onto your you know, upload it from the
Speaker 1: Internet onto your computer and then grab that PDF and
Speaker 1: put it on your Kindle desktop version. So that's the
Speaker 1: only draw back there is that you could collect a
Speaker 1: bunch of stuff in a one place and not have
Speaker 1: any of it somewhere else, and then you're like, damn,
Speaker 1: you know, bummer. So Makers of Civilization and race in
Speaker 1: history gives you a you know what, let's do just
Speaker 1: a snippet out of nowhere and we'll just pick something
Speaker 1: at random to show the epoch making. First King himself,
Speaker 1: the traditional builder of the first city and the founder
Speaker 1: of civilization which changed the whole history of mankind, has
Speaker 1: his personality and achievements preserved in considerable circumstantial detail in
Speaker 1: the numerous early representations of him and in the celebrations
Speaker 1: of his fame and his benefactions in humanity in Sumerian
Speaker 1: literature and in the Indian chronicles and Vedas, and in
Speaker 1: the great Gothic epics of the Nordics the Eddas, And
Speaker 1: for those benefactions he was laterally canonized and deified. Who
Speaker 1: are we talking about? Adam adam Thor ad Thor also
Speaker 1: known as Odin not a father, same guy, different title.
Speaker 1: Those records disclose him as a supremely gifted, tall and
Speaker 1: fair and bearded heroic chief of Nordic or Gothic racial type,
Speaker 1: a superman and sun worshiper, the foremost leader of the
Speaker 1: most advanced race in the opening of the mental age. Now,
Speaker 1: so many people when they hear the words sun worship
Speaker 1: are automatically going to think of blood and ritual and
Speaker 1: anti Christian and all this pagan shit and polytheistic shit
Speaker 1: that they put in our heads as a child. And
Speaker 1: that's not it. That's what they've done so that we
Speaker 1: won't look at our own heritage. Not only were they monotheists,
Speaker 1: but they brought the idea of monotheism to other cultures
Speaker 1: or groups of people. I wouldn't even call what they
Speaker 1: encountered a culture. And from there there was good people
Speaker 1: who took it up, and there's bad people who took
Speaker 1: it and manipulated it to their own gains. This idea
Speaker 1: still on the surface being this thing, and underneath it
Speaker 1: doing the same wickedness that they were always doing. And
Speaker 1: does that not describe a Catholic church? Does that not
Speaker 1: describe Judaism? Does that as being the same cult of
Speaker 1: human sacrifice child sacrifice?
Speaker 12: All right?
Speaker 1: So I says, these records disclose him as a supremely
Speaker 1: gifted to all fair bead to heroic chief of Nordic
Speaker 1: Catholic racial type, a superman, a son worshiper, the foremost
Speaker 1: leader of the most advanced race in the opening of
Speaker 1: the Middle Age, a practical scientific discoverer and especially the
Speaker 1: inventor of an un I'm sorry, and the inventor of
Speaker 1: an improved method of fire production. An invincible warrior and
Speaker 1: wise statesman and administrator. He was loved by all. He
Speaker 1: sounds awful like that guy that cropped up in Germany,
Speaker 1: with that guy who popped up in Libya. Same spirit
Speaker 1: running through marinkind guys with who he I'm sorry, who
Speaker 1: with rare creative genius arose to fashion the higher destinies
Speaker 1: of men, and by great practical improvements in the culture
Speaker 1: of his time. Within one generation he raised it up
Speaker 1: with the aid of his hearty sons and men of
Speaker 1: the same Gothic breed, established it firmly on a higher
Speaker 1: plane as civilization which the tides of time can never
Speaker 1: wash away. That's your people, be proud for the most part,
Speaker 1: and you know it. As long as you're not against that,
Speaker 1: you are people too. For fuck's sake, I mean, enough
Speaker 1: is enough with all the division. He and his early
Speaker 1: descendants are represented in the earliest carving sculptures and sacred
Speaker 1: seals as clad in Gothic dress, and we shall find
Speaker 1: that they were, in fact the early Goths, the most
Speaker 1: typical of the Nordic race. Make sure you guys can
Speaker 1: see what I'm learning at Okay, Most of the leading
Speaker 1: kings of the early Sumerian dynasties, including Sargon the Great
Speaker 1: and Many's, the first pharaoh of the First Dynasty of Egypt,
Speaker 1: repeatedly listen to this, repeatedly call themselves in their official
Speaker 1: documents and seals. Gut pronounced Goot or Goth, and one
Speaker 1: of the more progressive early Samerian dynasties in Mesopotamia called
Speaker 1: themselves Guti or Goti, and Goutti was the regular title
Speaker 1: of the Goths in Europe, the aspirated form of Goth
Speaker 1: having been coined merely by the Romans and never used
Speaker 1: by these people themselves. They were the Guti, that were
Speaker 1: the Goth. The h was added by the Romans to
Speaker 1: make that Goth, and significantly, the princes of the Gothic
Speaker 1: dynasty over forty three centuries ago already use as we
Speaker 1: shall see, and the especially Gothic titles of Duke and
Speaker 1: Earl as far back as five thousand years ago. So ge,
Speaker 1: do you think they might have been the spawners of
Speaker 1: the Britons? Ge? His personal name in Sumerian is Dar
Speaker 1: Dur or Ur as in Thor or Arthur get It,
Speaker 1: which latterally is aspirated as Thur or Thor has given
Speaker 1: us our modern weekday name of Thursday, the Thor's day
Speaker 1: of the Anglo Saxons and Jupiter's Day of the Romans
Speaker 1: and Latin nations. He also bears, amongst his Sumerian titles,
Speaker 1: that of Eah disclosed as the Samerian source of a
Speaker 1: Jupiter or father U or Jupiter, of whom he is
Speaker 1: seen to be the human original, and he's also Zeus,
Speaker 1: and that nice and of his titles of purr Or
Speaker 1: burr Or and Burr and Mitt the former is now
Speaker 1: disclosed as the Sumerian source of his Indian title of
Speaker 1: Puru of the Sun for the first Arian king, the
Speaker 1: bringer of fire to the home hearts of men, and
Speaker 1: along with the latter title, the source of Thor's Gothic
Speaker 1: title of bur me off, as I show in my
Speaker 1: new literal translation of the Nordic EDAs. This later title,
Speaker 1: also with his identical achievements, identifies him as the historical
Speaker 1: human original of the greatest of all Greek culture heroes,
Speaker 1: the fire hero Prometheus. And look what they did to him.
Speaker 1: Through that oive influence in the Greek culture. They turned Prometheus.
Speaker 1: They they pulled Prometheus's attributes out of what they Zeus
Speaker 1: and sacks Zeus was Thor. They split him in the two.
Speaker 1: They make him into Prometheus, and they torture him on
Speaker 1: a rock and have his liver pecked out. Why because
Speaker 1: he liberated mankind and this cult hated that, because they
Speaker 1: were having too much fun abusing and torturing and terrorizing people.
Speaker 1: They didn't want these people coming in and fucking up
Speaker 1: the parade, so they called our people. You know, they
Speaker 1: we were interfering with the God, with God, we were
Speaker 1: defying God. They didn't even have a concept of God
Speaker 1: until they met us. They were fucking around with demons Prometheus,
Speaker 1: with whose real history, however, great liberties seem to have
Speaker 1: been taken by the later mythmongering Hellenic Bards Jews just
Speaker 1: as are well, they weren't called that then, but you
Speaker 1: get what I'm saying this, this cult Hellenic Hellenic Burds,
Speaker 1: just as our later English and Welsh bards in the
Speaker 1: medieval period when tournaments were in vogue, have taken free
Speaker 1: license with the real original and very long pre Christian
Speaker 1: hero King Arthur or our fur artch you are right there,
Speaker 1: or air Thor, which means the Aryan Thor of the
Speaker 1: Nordic das hr Aryan, who we shall find is made
Speaker 1: a somewhat quixotic reflection of his real self. This same invincible,
Speaker 1: beneficent culture hero, the first universal king and institutor of
Speaker 1: it away and there's a pop up et if you
Speaker 1: saw uh, the first universal king and institutor of town
Speaker 1: or city life and monogamous marriage to hear that the
Speaker 1: first institutor of town or city life and monogamous marriage,
Speaker 1: the Samarian king durh or Tur, the first Arian king
Speaker 1: and the founder of civilization, and now made historical end
Speaker 1: of fixed date. Guess where he settled what he settled
Speaker 1: before he meant made it to uh Samaria Troy. That's
Speaker 1: also talked about in Yetta because Woden and as a
Speaker 1: holes are continually rating the spinsters, the weavers who make
Speaker 1: the clothing that were in Troy. Just to screw with
Speaker 1: thor so he had to put some put some beatens
Speaker 1: on him. As this long line of recovered historical Aryan
Speaker 1: kings and dynasties from the first king onwards with their
Speaker 1: achievements down the ages, now passes like a pageant before
Speaker 1: our eyes. We see for the first time the true
Speaker 1: perspective of ancient history from its beginning. We see for
Speaker 1: the first time the true perspective of ancient history from
Speaker 1: its beginning, with the names and titles, personalities Aryan race,
Speaker 1: and relative fixed dates for the authors and the early
Speaker 1: developers and propagators of civilization the hitherto prehistoric period, and
Speaker 1: that's in quotations prehistoric back to the rise of civilization
Speaker 1: now becomes historic, and so far from having been a
Speaker 1: period as supposed of dead stagnation, it is one of
Speaker 1: ceaseless movement and progress. Civilization from its start is seen
Speaker 1: to have been fashioned essentially on the same fundamental lines
Speaker 1: as at the present day. You don't need to improve
Speaker 1: perfection right, and the astonishing modernness of its scientific authors
Speaker 1: and their outlook on life make them feel quite near
Speaker 1: to us, though separated by thousands of years, as they
Speaker 1: are found to be our own kith and kin. Why
Speaker 1: do you think I am so interested in these two books?
Speaker 1: Why do you think I'm so interested in this history?
Speaker 1: This is what we've been missing. Remember that thing that
Speaker 1: makes you hollow that you go trying to fit other
Speaker 1: things in to see if it because you don't know
Speaker 1: what it is that you're missing. This is it right here?
Speaker 1: And through their inscriptions in primitive Arian or Sumerian speech,
Speaker 1: still uttering their message, they seemed to stretch out their
Speaker 1: hands and speak to us in fellowship and understanding, with
Speaker 1: trumpet tongues. Down the long quarridor of time, we see
Speaker 1: them as vigorous, thriving industrial people, living in cities and
Speaker 1: spreading their civilization and ordered government with free institutions amongst
Speaker 1: the wild aboriginal races whom they welded into civilized nations. Right,
Speaker 1: we seem to hear they didn't say, They didn't say
Speaker 1: genocided and murdered of No, they rehabilitated them from their
Speaker 1: wickedness and their misguidance from that freaking serpent cult and
Speaker 1: made them into either upstanding good people, showing them direction
Speaker 1: in a way. And if that way didn't take out
Speaker 1: of there, they went quickly. Only fools allow themselves to
Speaker 1: live near threats danger, Right, someone who is going to
Speaker 1: be predatorial. We seem to hear the tramp of their
Speaker 1: well disciplined legions and see the glitter of the sun
Speaker 1: on their spears as they repelled the attacks of the
Speaker 1: would be destroyers of their civilization. Once you were part
Speaker 1: of their society, civilization they protected. They didn't look, oh,
Speaker 1: does he look like that?
Speaker 13: No.
Speaker 1: If you were part of their kingdom, they protected you
Speaker 1: from all outside invasions because they were the guardians, the protectors.
Speaker 1: They were called the Shields. Before Thor's time or in
Speaker 1: Thor's father's time, they were called the Shields. That's the
Speaker 1: Goths from which he came from when they conquered a territory,
Speaker 1: when they established a civilization, they protected the people of
Speaker 1: that place, always being the minority because they were always
Speaker 1: in a foreign land, basically because they were going out
Speaker 1: and seeking new adventure, new territory. And when they came
Speaker 1: across bad things and bad people, they put them down
Speaker 1: and they kept the order. And that's why the eye
Speaker 1: was their symbol as well as the sun. The sun
Speaker 1: is the eye and the sky, and the eye was
Speaker 1: saying we're watching over you in protection, not in surveillance
Speaker 1: when and not turning it inverted so that it's attacking
Speaker 1: its own people. That's what they did. They always did.
Speaker 1: Let's see, we see the just Okay, it says as
Speaker 1: is recorded in their inscriptions and represented in their monuments.
Speaker 1: There's evidence in stone of their achievements, accomplishments, and their
Speaker 1: protection of others. We see the just laws they enacted
Speaker 1: for championing the cause of the weak and poor and needy.
Speaker 1: There are great public works and temples and libraries and
Speaker 1: palaces adorned with scriptures, sculptures and other works of high
Speaker 1: and naturalistic art. And we see them engaged in industries
Speaker 1: and as daring pioneer mariner merchantmen in their small winged galleys,
Speaker 1: scouring and exploring the wide seas and confines of unknown
Speaker 1: ancient world. Okay, So when I hear that they're doing
Speaker 1: these things the cause of the week of the poor,
Speaker 1: the needy, bringing people's you know, bringing people's uh level
Speaker 1: of life, provided they're putting forth the effort they're they're
Speaker 1: they're raising their they call quality of life innovations and
Speaker 1: things of that, and supporting particularly the old, the elderly
Speaker 1: people who are in you know, you know, who have
Speaker 1: whatever handicaps. They actually talk about this another time, that
Speaker 1: the that the people help and provide it sounds very
Speaker 1: sathyent in that in that regard, Uh, it's also just mankind, human,
Speaker 1: you know, humane to do that without having any problems.
Speaker 1: You take care of your own like a family, like
Speaker 1: an extended family. This is why I have a hard
Speaker 1: time with people who go a little too ahhh about,
Speaker 1: you know, hating on others, because this isn't what our
Speaker 1: people were about, and it's not what Germany was about.
Speaker 1: And when people people need to re establish the integrity
Speaker 1: and the in the name the reputation of both, they
Speaker 1: don't need to drag it back or or become the
Speaker 1: very thing that confirms in the minds of people who
Speaker 1: already have the fault of the wrong impression, the wrong idea,
Speaker 1: because then they're never going to look toward there, toward Germany,
Speaker 1: and asked the question, is that really how they were?
Speaker 1: Is that really what happened there? Or were they the
Speaker 1: ones the victim of the the idea of the victor
Speaker 1: tells the story and what did really? What really did happen?
Speaker 1: Was there something there to learn about how life could
Speaker 1: be without the parasite destroying them and working to harm
Speaker 1: the people? When the when the government actually or those leaders,
Speaker 1: when the leaders actually cared about the people, is there
Speaker 1: a difference? Do they do they experience a better quality
Speaker 1: of life than what we have? Did the same thing
Speaker 1: happen in Libya? Were they able to do all that
Speaker 1: without having extreme, you know whatever animosity toward other people
Speaker 1: who weren't, you know, specifically Germanic? Were they gracious and
Speaker 1: congratulatory to Jesse Owens. Is excellence something that's appreciated no
Speaker 1: matter who lives up to it? Do they encourage people
Speaker 1: to live up to their best? Because there's so many
Speaker 1: there's many many people out there. Getting them all pissed
Speaker 1: off at you is not the right way to manage them.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna get through to these fucking retards and
Speaker 1: you're gonna and you're gonna piss off somebody who's already
Speaker 1: experience about how they're gonna steal everything because they're snapping.
Speaker 1: Their fucking EVT is gonna get shut down, and that
Speaker 1: you know once they once they get go from there,
Speaker 1: they're gonna move to households and then you're gonna have
Speaker 1: to put something in through them in order to stop
Speaker 1: them from harming you and your family. That might happen
Speaker 1: and with it buy November, that's only about a week
Speaker 1: from now. Where was I going with that? You're asked, Well,
Speaker 1: the point is excellence, you know, building bringing people up. Yes,
Speaker 1: but the criminal element is something that they also took
Speaker 1: care of, but not. It's not not you know, generalizing
Speaker 1: all people of a certain type as the criminal behavior
Speaker 1: you know of, you know those who do and if
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent of them do well, the one percent
Speaker 1: can hang out with us. The other ninety nine are
Speaker 1: going to go flushed down the toilet like the turds
Speaker 1: they are or sens back somewhere, you know, the point
Speaker 1: when civilization emerges on the horizon of written history. Hitherto
Speaker 1: the subject of vague and vastly conflicting conjecture is now
Speaker 1: fairly fixed, and it.
Speaker 14: Is all.
Speaker 1: Unsuspected located in Cappadocia. What did I say? In Asia
Speaker 1: minor Turkey? That's where our people had their hymen, which
Speaker 1: is Hittite for heaven on a high mountain. Heaven is high.
Speaker 1: The Eden was the land between two rivers. It was
Speaker 1: in a low valley, and it was it was called hell.
Speaker 1: Now do you starting to see where this nonsense that
Speaker 1: they've taken for literal translation and applied to the religions
Speaker 1: of Abrahamic religion stuff? And do you see how things
Speaker 1: could have been turned into fantasy mythos. But you're supposed
Speaker 1: to believe it because you have faith, rather than it's
Speaker 1: coming from its terrestrial and very realistic and reasonable rational origins.
Speaker 1: The land of Saint George of England, and the land
Speaker 1: which scientists have shown is really a part of Europe geographically, geologically, zoologically,
Speaker 1: and botanically and climacticly, so that civilization and its authors
Speaker 1: were European. Here in Cappadocia, we find the first civilized
Speaker 1: king established himself and built the first town or city
Speaker 1: and formed the first civilized state. According to the Sumerian accounts,
Speaker 1: and the Indian chronicles also locate him and his capital
Speaker 1: in Asia Minor. There is some evidence indicating that this
Speaker 1: first king, with his adventurous band of fellow tribesmen, came
Speaker 1: from the old Gothic land of the the Uxane and
Speaker 1: Danube valley of southwest Europe. Then forty three years later
Speaker 1: we find his son and successor descending from the uplands
Speaker 1: of Asia Minor with his army of civilized Aryan tribesmen
Speaker 1: as an armed peasantry into the rich alluvial plains of
Speaker 1: Mesopotamia to form there a great empire, building there the
Speaker 1: first cities in the land of Shinar and civilizing the
Speaker 1: black headed people, haired black haired people, the Semitic, Chaldean,
Speaker 1: Aboriginatees Aborigines. It is this advent into Mesopotamia of this immigrant,
Speaker 1: ruling and civilizing, ruling and civilizing Aryan or Nordic race
Speaker 1: that has now disclosed to be what nowadays is called
Speaker 1: by a seriologist the coming of the Samarans. So isn't
Speaker 1: that interesting too. Think about that change in things when
Speaker 1: you had a wave of people coming in that did intend.
Speaker 1: These immigrants intended to change things. Imagine them improving your
Speaker 1: situation in life, rather than trying to suck it dry
Speaker 1: and take advantage and rape it and rob it. Wow,
Speaker 1: it's different caliber of people, right, this immigrant ruling and
Speaker 1: civilizing Aryan or Nordic race. Yes, from this epoch of
Speaker 1: the advent of the Aryans into Mesopotamia as Sumerians, the
Speaker 1: historical Sumerians of this epoch, having been hitherto unrecognized by
Speaker 1: as Syriologists, we can now trace in continuous dated details
Speaker 1: civilization developing and advancing down the ages in the hands
Speaker 1: of the descendants of its Aryan originators, who are seen
Speaker 1: to have formed the exclusive imperial ruling caste in the
Speaker 1: civilized states of the ancient world. We thus gain a
Speaker 1: new aid of immense importance toward historic reconstruction and factors
Speaker 1: making for progress in civilization and towards a new synthesis
Speaker 1: of the mental and physical sciences. Thus, the reason for
Speaker 1: the remarkable unity in the elements of the various ancient
Speaker 1: local civilizations hitherto inexplicable. A unity hitherto logically recognized and
Speaker 1: implying unity in civilization by only by Professor Elliot Smith
Speaker 1: and his school, who, however, ascribe its originating and propagating
Speaker 1: center to Egypt. Is now seen to be found in
Speaker 1: the newly elicited the fact that the authors I screwing
Speaker 1: up there. You are supposedly independent ancient civilizations were one
Speaker 1: in the same ruling race, the Arians. So whether we
Speaker 1: were talking about Samerian, Egyptian, Persian, the Indus Valley, so India.
Speaker 1: You know, Mohendro Daro was one of the Urian settlements,
Speaker 1: the place that they called the city of the Dead.
Speaker 1: Obviously it got his name after the fact, not before,
Speaker 1: not while it was in use. Uh where else are
Speaker 1: going with this? Arona Rock is already covered by sam
Speaker 1: Mesopotamia right wherever else Turkey, they were all any any
Speaker 1: of the ancient civilizations. It was our people that created
Speaker 1: that civilization, and many of the many of the people.
Speaker 1: Now if they hated us, if we weren't fair, just
Speaker 1: and honest and good rulers with fair and just laws,
Speaker 1: laws that kept saying things simple, but kept people in order,
Speaker 1: and that protected them against invasion, if if we were
Speaker 1: pieces of shit, they would have considered us gods. They
Speaker 1: would have called us demons. They called them gods. Then
Speaker 1: name got go turned into God and it stayed that
Speaker 1: way in Germanic lay in the Germanic language. So because
Speaker 1: got me ons means God's with us, you can thread
Speaker 1: the rest on your own. There's that was page twenty. Well,
Speaker 1: that where I stopped here, and there's seven hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty two pages that a lot of it's appendicies, So
Speaker 1: don't get too discouraged by that. You almost you can
Speaker 1: almost say that it's six hundred and eighty pages long
Speaker 1: with another one hundred and you know pages or so
Speaker 1: of appendices, but those are actually worth reading too. This
Speaker 1: is one of those books where I read every goddamn
Speaker 1: bit of it, you know, to the end, unless it
Speaker 1: was just like pictures I was flipping through and just
Speaker 1: like some of that stuff, I just quickly went through it.
Speaker 1: But now everybody knows and knowing just have to battle
Speaker 1: Geo Joe. Now this one is the newest one. I
Speaker 1: just popped up, but this one is six years old. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I want to go to Yeah, we'll get into this
Speaker 1: thing too. There was a lot of other things I
Speaker 1: was going to add to profit and freemasonry. This is
Speaker 1: Joseph Smith and Kabbalady occult connection. And this is how
Speaker 1: many pages long? It's long enough, it's pretty long. So
Speaker 1: this is this is for a different time, I guess,
Speaker 1: because we're already deep into this time. Wise, I wanted
Speaker 1: to get into some of the some more of the
Speaker 1: uh Instagram things I found this evening. But we'll just
Speaker 1: play it by or, which is a weird thing to say,
Speaker 1: Not really though, all right, So this is why is energy?
Speaker 1: What is energy? Inertia and ether? This one is electricus?
Speaker 1: I had it right, but now I didn't. I didn't
Speaker 1: do that. Electricity is electricus? Is electricity a cover story
Speaker 1: for electrostatic electrostatics and their secrets? No one asked that
Speaker 1: questions less are a lot smarter than most people. All right,
Speaker 1: So energy destruction. Now I again, and I almost did this.
Speaker 1: I actually did this, started typing this out in the
Speaker 1: middle of a broadcast because I love when people argue
Speaker 1: with me. I love when they argue with me when
Speaker 1: they're wrong, and they So there used to be this
Speaker 1: thing when younger people were talking to older people. If
Speaker 1: they did if they didn't agree, the younger person fell
Speaker 1: silent until they could go and look up what they
Speaker 1: were challenged on, and then they would go do that,
Speaker 1: and if they still had a disagreement, maybe they could
Speaker 1: teach or explain to the older person why they don't agree.
Speaker 1: And that's not to say that the information that they
Speaker 1: got that corroborates their suspicion that the elder was incorrect
Speaker 1: is itself valid, but at least gives them a place
Speaker 1: to discuss, a platform or an opportunity to have a
Speaker 1: discussion about it. These days, there's not that anymore. Everyone
Speaker 1: has allowed their ego and their hubrews to go out
Speaker 1: of control. There is no respect for the length of
Speaker 1: time that a person has been alive to experience things
Speaker 1: and how that might change their perceptions of the world
Speaker 1: and form them into more well rounded ideas of how
Speaker 1: things work. Nobody knows what you've done, nobody knows what
Speaker 1: they what you've you know, studied. All they know is
Speaker 1: how you present yourself to the public. And they're not
Speaker 1: even concerned too much about you, because if they were
Speaker 1: that analytical about other things, they would know more things,
Speaker 1: and they would know they would have the wisdom already
Speaker 1: to not always think that they're right and have the
Speaker 1: wisdom also to accept new information and to also and
Speaker 1: to also listen. Even if you don't agree with something,
Speaker 1: you have to listen in order to know whether or
Speaker 1: not you are in agreement or not. It's not just
Speaker 1: pushing your will upon someone else because you're being pushy
Speaker 1: and aggressive. So that being said, I was challenged on
Speaker 1: the fact of whether or not energy can be destroyed.
Speaker 1: Now some people will say that that's no, you can't, can't, can't.
Speaker 1: Because that said, so the okay, I'm gonna let you
Speaker 1: listen to this. I'm gonna not interrupt very much. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna go get up and do something, and that's it.
Speaker 1: I'll be back in a little bit. And if you
Speaker 1: want to support the show over on FTJ, i'd be awesome.
Speaker 1: If you don't, yeah, you know, with some of the sauce,
Speaker 1: or get the ninety essentials from my website. You like
Speaker 1: that too? What else? So maybe I should read this?
Speaker 1: Why is this here?
Speaker 16: Oh?
Speaker 1: I know, okay, let's go back to that I said.
Speaker 1: The discharge into counterspace is the destruction of energy. Constructive
Speaker 1: and inverse wave or destructive interference. Doctor Manzo talks about
Speaker 1: destructive interference. Now it's not. It's the inverse wave function
Speaker 1: of a particular energy form, so that when it meets
Speaker 1: the other one. This is how noise cancelation works. Where's
Speaker 1: the noise go boom? Right, nothing, It's gone into counterspace,
Speaker 1: which is basically we'll talk about that a second. It's
Speaker 1: a structure of energy. I said three times, you argue
Speaker 1: for the systemic bullshit of the cult of society against me.
Speaker 1: I'm not a neveras tard who doesn't think I've been
Speaker 1: studying things otherwise I don't speak on them. Yes, energy
Speaker 1: can be destroyed. They told the science Dinian bullshit to
Speaker 1: make his bullshit math work. The guy was a plagiarist,
Speaker 1: thief and genocidal madman who hated the Germanic people. Surprise,
Speaker 1: our science comes from the cabalistic mysticism, not reality. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, maybe be less pigheaded and more willing to
Speaker 1: consider that. You've been mister led And I said, you
Speaker 1: know the whole thing about me to be a little
Speaker 1: bit older than you, And you know, anybody can be smart,
Speaker 1: but a wise person always wins. You know, you can
Speaker 1: be as smart as you want to be, but at
Speaker 1: the at the expense of your of your of your
Speaker 1: wisdom isn't exactly smart. It's not the smart approach, and
Speaker 1: the wise person knows to take it in and consider.
Speaker 1: And if you can quickly eliminate the constant of the idea,
Speaker 1: then that's fine. But if it's just a belief system
Speaker 1: where you don't you've done none of the math to
Speaker 1: understand this. You've done none of the the research of
Speaker 1: the believe this. You've don't. You've been told that this
Speaker 1: is a precept of of of nature and that it
Speaker 1: must be so because of sciencey people Bill told you what.
Speaker 1: But you have to break yourself completely out of the
Speaker 1: cult of who's been telling everything that we've known about
Speaker 1: our education for the last one hundred and ten years
Speaker 1: or more, and understand that lots of things have been lies,
Speaker 1: and pretty much all our entire perception of reality has
Speaker 1: been a sham and a scam in a scheme run
Speaker 1: by certain people who can control you with that lie,
Speaker 1: can divert you from greater deeper truths, who can keep
Speaker 1: you sick because of them too, through their manipulation of
Speaker 1: science to the level of when it comes to health
Speaker 1: and your perception of that. And I have some more
Speaker 1: to tell you about that too. That'll be really interesting
Speaker 1: to most people. I think a different way of looking
Speaker 1: at things, or a better way for me to have
Speaker 1: to say what I've said before. Right, Well, let's just
Speaker 1: get started. These people have incentive to lie.
Speaker 13: And to.
Speaker 1: Claim the truth of science in their favor, and certainly
Speaker 1: not something that they've drafted up by peer reviewed nonsense.
Speaker 1: And one person, one person's lie being accepted by another
Speaker 1: group of people. It's not really the way you find truth.
Speaker 1: And you know, nothing's you get it. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: go for here and then we'll get started. So I
Speaker 1: have a listen to this, Please listen carefully to this.
Speaker 1: And this is called energy destruction, counterspace and anti matter
Speaker 1: simplex definition, simplex defined. And I don't think I said
Speaker 1: anything else about it. Hello, is it two years ago?
Speaker 1: All right? There's another one here, and I'm gonna play
Speaker 1: you after this.
Speaker 12: Hello, incredibly busy lately.
Speaker 1: It's hard to tell that he's he's lost weight until
Speaker 1: you see his older videos again and then you're like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: he really has lost some way, a considerable amount.
Speaker 12: Nobody else talks about. I love discovery. Wisdom is its
Speaker 12: own reward absolutely love. That doesn't pay the bills. But
Speaker 12: I was doing leatherwork and building stuff and fixing stuff.
Speaker 12: That's what pays the bills.
Speaker 17: Right.
Speaker 12: It's a neat book here. It's called Causality, Electromagnetic Induction
Speaker 12: and Gravitation. I got a couple of copies of it,
Speaker 12: completely worn it out. It's aid professor and doctor actually
Speaker 12: also two PhDs, doctor ol Ed Jeff Amenko, incredibly brilliant guy.
Speaker 12: He wrote a really really great book on learning about
Speaker 12: equations regarding field theory. Here he is, you can actually
Speaker 12: find this online. All I said, it's underlying my book
Speaker 12: is actually falling apart since I have been through it
Speaker 12: so many times. Right here, and he emphasizes it over
Speaker 12: and over again on a Pace sixteen, and he's referring
Speaker 12: to James Dark. Maxwell says, it's equations solutions don't indicate
Speaker 12: the existence and causal links between electrical and magnetic fields.
Speaker 12: Of course, electricity is a hierd of electricity and magnetism
Speaker 12: and electrostatics, and magnetic field is required in the circuit
Speaker 12: that makes up electricity. But these are a conjugate. They
Speaker 12: are an inseparable, not in a binary but a unity
Speaker 12: principle an attribute, of course, it wouldn't be a binary.
Speaker 12: That's like some fool thinking, well, a magnet is a
Speaker 12: north pool in a spool. Actually that's the extrapolation of
Speaker 12: the three dimensional force spector that actually makes out a magnetism.
Speaker 12: But here is the magnet, the fact that we call
Speaker 12: it a magnet. It has a field that extra to it,
Speaker 12: which of course is fascinated to humanity since the dawn
Speaker 12: of time. But there is not a duality in saying
Speaker 12: a magnet, you know, has a north pool and a
Speaker 12: sealth pool. It actually has the inversus counter space. When
Speaker 12: this is present, that is pressed humanity fundamentally, seemingly so
Speaker 12: from my perspective, can't wrap its mind around the fact
Speaker 12: that when there's a release of energy, you necessitatively not
Speaker 12: only have something else that's slightly different, kind of like
Speaker 12: can you remove the temperature out of water, You end
Speaker 12: up with this hard water, which is almost like a
Speaker 12: stone if you throw it at Somebody said, but it
Speaker 12: has another property to it, and the same is true
Speaker 12: with the release of energy. You actually have this three
Speaker 12: dimensional force spector that makes up a voluminous a volume.
Speaker 12: I eat the taurus, what's making up the air inside
Speaker 12: the balloon of the Taurus is magnetism. When this is present,
Speaker 12: that is present. So doctor Olidijafamenkouy, I think I got
Speaker 12: leather dust in my lungs. Yeah, standing a lot of
Speaker 12: loaded today. He's talking about sourceless of electromagnetic fields, and
Speaker 12: that the fact that none of the scientists to date
Speaker 12: other than himself, has recognized the fact that there is
Speaker 12: no point in causation. And actually that's quite humorous because
Speaker 12: there's no causation, and the principle of emanation is a
Speaker 12: emanationism is the metaphysics behind Pythagoras, Plato, Proclays, Platinist, Dominius, Sidianis, Avadavedanta,
Speaker 12: original Buddhism, on and on and on. According to these
Speaker 12: equations and time variable systems act for making, the fields
Speaker 12: are always created simultaneously. Once created, the two fields coexists
Speaker 12: from then on without any effect upon one another. Anyway,
Speaker 12: He scratching his head throughout this entire book. There's very
Speaker 12: very brilliant gentleman with two PhDs. And what he can't understand,
Speaker 12: what is divinely simple because of the nature's divinely simple,
Speaker 12: is this is a conjugate system. By the way, speaking
Speaker 12: about the so called fields and talking about protons, and
Speaker 12: we want to talk about antimatter and destructive interference. Like
Speaker 12: in the case of lasers or regular light. We can
Speaker 12: have constructive interference where two light sources of x intensity
Speaker 12: or looks will actually amplify one another. But what happens
Speaker 12: to the light energy where it's destructive. This thing that
Speaker 12: we actually call antimatter is nothing other than inverse phase matter.
Speaker 12: It's not like there's some sort of bizarro particle that
Speaker 12: and that's actually how these folks of quantum will do
Speaker 12: and write it about antimatter as well. You know, there's
Speaker 12: antimatter exploits. We think we've seen it in Hubble space telescope,
Speaker 12: and we know antimatter is real because it's actually been
Speaker 12: created as a byproduct of CERN and other particle looks.
Speaker 12: What's the other one. There's CERN, and there's the particle
Speaker 12: accelerator that's underneath Italy knows between Switzerland and the Austerich Austria,
Speaker 12: that's CERN. There's two major particle accelerators. Anyway, we know
Speaker 12: that antimatter is real, but it is not antimatter. It's
Speaker 12: just inverse phase matter. Mutual cancelation, super high energy light.
Speaker 12: As I've said many times, I've predicted this years ago
Speaker 12: and it's finally discovered two years ago. You could look
Speaker 12: that up where phase lasers, when they're destructive interference would
Speaker 12: actually generate to fundamental matter i e. Hydrogen. So that
Speaker 12: which we call that antimatters is inverse phase matter. What
Speaker 12: of the case people think incorrectly, of course, I've never
Speaker 12: denied particles have actually attacked atomism. Atomism is a belief system.
Speaker 12: And if your hammer, everything is a nail.
Speaker 1: And if you know, you're a.
Speaker 12: So called scientist, which is not a scientist by true
Speaker 12: Aristotilian definition. But these people are mathematicians. They think everything
Speaker 12: is a particle, and they don't believe in anything. They
Speaker 12: can't be counted. I've never denied nuclude particles.
Speaker 16: It is an.
Speaker 12: Established track once again that all free neutrons turned into
Speaker 12: protons after what's been established to be roughly seventeen minutes,
Speaker 12: that being the case at which all parties agree. This means,
Speaker 12: of course there's only one fundamental particle. But that fundamental particle,
Speaker 12: even though it is a nuclear particle, it's not some
Speaker 12: sort of like BB you know, that has any actual existence.
Speaker 12: What a so called proton, and all neutrons become protons
Speaker 12: once they're free. Therefore, a neutron there's nothing other than
Speaker 12: a proton modality, just as antimatter is not some sort
Speaker 12: of inversion of the matter, because when you say antimatter
Speaker 12: you think of something that's totally the opposite what it is.
Speaker 12: It's not totally the opposite. It's just inverse phase matter.
Speaker 12: And of course when they collide, the enormous amount of
Speaker 12: energy is released and they mutually cancel each other out.
Speaker 12: But that's not different than destructive interference in the case
Speaker 12: of light or the so called famous or the dual
Speaker 12: slid experiment. One of the case if a proton is
Speaker 12: thought accurately to be in the case of understanding fields,
Speaker 12: is they're just like field terminals. Like I've get a
Speaker 12: twelvete lead acid one hundred and fifty emp hour battery
Speaker 12: over there, weighs like seventy two pounds as absolutely.
Speaker 1: Heavy as hell, that which we call because of the
Speaker 1: lead content of the battery is super heavy.
Speaker 12: Well, a proton is no different than a battery terminal.
Speaker 12: At the center of any atom, to say, the hydrogen atom,
Speaker 12: for example, we're looking at a battery terminal. So we
Speaker 12: actually have a spherical frequency dielectric condensate spherical frequency, which
Speaker 12: is of course is what scientists actually accurately called as
Speaker 12: etp or a zero time particle exists for a certain
Speaker 12: period of time. According to us, it's nearly indefinite, and
Speaker 12: of course all matter is compounded hydrogen and by definition
Speaker 12: of the person who discovered it is so called electron
Speaker 12: discovered by JJ Thompson, which he himself said was not
Speaker 12: a particle. But that's what we have today because these
Speaker 12: scientists are atomus. It's just as he said, one unit
Speaker 12: of dielectric induction. It's not a particle at all. So
Speaker 12: even at the most time mental level, the so called
Speaker 12: proton is nothing other than a field terminal, just like
Speaker 12: a terminal on a battery, you know, the energy on
Speaker 12: the battery. Analogously, to use the field terminal relative to
Speaker 12: the battery. It doesn't have anything in itself. But what
Speaker 12: if we can only see the terminals of a battery.
Speaker 12: It's like, well, we know we have this unit of induction.
Speaker 12: If I attach something here or if I you know,
Speaker 12: bring something into contact with it, we have this energy
Speaker 12: transference or loss of energy. The actual energy is underneath
Speaker 12: the terminal. The terminal itself is just the terminal of
Speaker 12: the battery. The actual energy of the system is in
Speaker 12: the substrate underneath the terminal. You know that huge block
Speaker 12: of lead and distilled water and acid. It's kind of
Speaker 12: a pretty perfect analogy. So a proton is just a
Speaker 12: field terminal. But at no point in time I ever
Speaker 12: denying particles. So antimatter make mother nature really simple, because
Speaker 12: mother nature's a hairy or on pit shake and she's
Speaker 12: really really really simple. Is just inverse, says matter. One
Speaker 12: of the things that AC generators were burning themselves out.
Speaker 12: We have a Nikola Tesla of course, invented the specific
Speaker 12: arch form, which is the AC generator. By the way,
Speaker 12: an AC generator doesn't generate electricity, it manifests it.
Speaker 1: But did you hear you said? They said energy can
Speaker 1: never be created nor destroyed, only changed. So where does
Speaker 1: the manifest come into play? If that's true. The AC
Speaker 1: generator manifested from the ether the energy, and it can
Speaker 1: go back into the ether into the counter space, so
Speaker 1: technically can be created and destroyed.
Speaker 12: The so called AC generators, as I've said many times,
Speaker 12: it's just an inside out a magnet where the magnetic
Speaker 12: feels on the inside and the plane of inertia of
Speaker 12: the dialect to reflect on the outside. Anyway, these generators
Speaker 12: would burn themselves up. And Charles prody Stein meant, just
Speaker 12: like the AC lines or in the backyard of your
Speaker 12: house for power current. He discovered the way to keep
Speaker 12: these from burning themselves out. And it's kind of ingenious.
Speaker 12: And this ties into lightning, and this ties into destructive
Speaker 12: interference in the case of light To keep these AC
Speaker 12: generators from self destroying, he used, and you can look
Speaker 12: this up. How AC generators would perfect us so it'd
Speaker 12: be usable systems is he laminated the steel. And by
Speaker 12: laminating the steel, you can actually see this if you
Speaker 12: take part of a small AC motor and a little
Speaker 12: remote car or something like that, you can see the
Speaker 12: steel lamination is that there's a hystorisis cycle where in
Speaker 12: the actual electric field and the specifically the magnetism the
Speaker 12: current Therever the AC generator was burning the motors out,
Speaker 12: the laminated steel was used to guide the magnetic field
Speaker 12: relative to the ambridge of the circuit, a circuit of
Speaker 12: course to the AC generator. Electricity is the circuit of
Speaker 12: dielectricity and magnetism, which not two different things, but the
Speaker 12: conjugate substrate of the entire universe. Like why are these
Speaker 12: I don't know how Charles party Steinman figured that out,
Speaker 12: but he did. It might have been through experimentation, It
Speaker 12: might have been due to his incredibly sharp mind that
Speaker 12: this laminated steel guided the field rather than the magnetism
Speaker 12: being lost into the inner atomic structure of the steel itself.
Speaker 12: Because the AC generators were literally dumping the energy into
Speaker 12: themselves rather than you know which, All AC generators today
Speaker 12: follow this principle to guide the field structure of the
Speaker 12: electrical circuit. Is that kind of genius laminating the steel
Speaker 12: to make up the AC motor because you want to
Speaker 12: guide the energy rather than have it being dissipated into itself. Ask.
Speaker 12: A AC generator is a low voltage, low ambridge relative
Speaker 12: to lightning, for example, energy circuit, but you don't want
Speaker 12: it to be lost in the actual generator like lightning
Speaker 12: will blast something into oblivion. Like I guess some some
Speaker 12: sewing machine thread you're from sewing wall. It's like, what
Speaker 12: the what the fuzz and sewing machine thread there? I'll
Speaker 12: edit that out of this video. It's like, what was
Speaker 12: that it's like, oh, looks like a will to beast
Speaker 12: was sitting on that petrified wood. Actually it was some
Speaker 12: sewing thread, like guided lightning versus natural lightning. Also, ball
Speaker 12: lightning is a synonymous with the nucleus of an atom.
Speaker 12: There's actually quite a few videos now of ball lightning.
Speaker 12: But lightning guys like the enormous amount of high voltage
Speaker 12: high ampers is in a lightning strike and many count
Speaker 12: of thousands of people they've been struck by lightning. But
Speaker 12: no one has ever talked about the fact that and
Speaker 12: Dollar has mentioned this, not the specific point that lightning
Speaker 12: is a discharge in the counter space most of the
Speaker 12: energy of a.
Speaker 1: Light Okay, now, catch that it's a discharge into counter space,
Speaker 1: into the ether. It's a discharge into the ether itself.
Speaker 12: Lightning strike, and it's not actually a strike because these
Speaker 12: are Dollar's words, which you are one hundred percent accurate
Speaker 12: at discharging encounter space when someone is struck by lightning, yeah,
Speaker 12: ninety nine point whatever percent as well well over ninety
Speaker 12: eight percent of the current of a lightning strike. And
Speaker 12: it's not a strike, like you're actually transferring energy from
Speaker 12: here to here. When someone is struck by lightning. You know,
Speaker 12: most people actually survive. Many people of course do diet
Speaker 12: or across the heart and they're grounded, and many people
Speaker 12: have died from countless numbers have lived. Most of the
Speaker 12: lightning strike does not pass through that person at all.
Speaker 12: The ground that we actually acknowledge relative to lightning and
Speaker 12: lightning arrestors and lightning and ruds that are actually grounded
Speaker 12: into the earth, most of the lightning strike does not
Speaker 12: actually reach ground or actually dissipate in the ground. It's
Speaker 12: a complete total discharge in thecounter space. So taking one
Speaker 12: hundred percent of a so called lightning strike, which is
Speaker 12: not technically a striking, most of that is a discharge
Speaker 12: in the counter space. This is actually Eric Nuller's words,
Speaker 12: and it's actually something incredibly important to think about it.
Speaker 12: It's a dissipation and discharge of the medium they actually
Speaker 12: make called captured lightning. It's an art form where they.
Speaker 1: Actually bombard discharge into the medium, the medium being the
Speaker 1: ether a e th or if you want to spell
Speaker 1: it like that, with the ade kind of close together.
Speaker 1: That is what he's talking about here. So the majority
Speaker 1: of it's it can it hit something, sure? Is it
Speaker 1: going to hit it? With its full force. No, because
Speaker 1: the the action itself is the discharge into the ether itself,
Speaker 1: into the counter space or.
Speaker 12: This plastic LExEN which is that really thick, clear plastic stuff.
Speaker 12: They send it through this super high power X ray
Speaker 12: machine which is just wickedly deadly, through a conveyor belt,
Speaker 12: and when it reaches back out of the x ray machine.
Speaker 12: They sell this stuff on eBay. It goes for like
Speaker 12: fifty to sixty bucks. It's very beautiful. They'll actually take
Speaker 12: in a nail which is grounded to a ground and
Speaker 12: they'll actually put it on the edge of the LExEN
Speaker 12: block and tap it with a hammer so that it
Speaker 12: grounds up. But most of that is actually discharged in
Speaker 12: the counterspace. What it does is it burns in this
Speaker 12: fern like lightning strike pattern, and everybody finds it very beautiful,
Speaker 12: and it follows the Golden ratio nearly perfectly. It's the
Speaker 12: perfect fractal algorithm of the discharge of dielectricity. Now, the
Speaker 12: people that actually make that say that they're actually draining electrons.
Speaker 12: The lex scar's completely ridiculous. It is a discharge in
Speaker 12: the counterspace, part of which is grounded, but it burns.
Speaker 12: It leaves little burn tracks in the plastic lexin, and
Speaker 12: of course they sell that as artwork. So this notion
Speaker 12: that lightning is a vertical discharge which is grounded the
Speaker 12: energy grounds is ridiculous. I mean that should be blatantly obviously.
Speaker 12: They may ever think about it because human beings, most
Speaker 12: human beings actually survive lightning lightning strikes. So lighting is
Speaker 12: this discharge in the counterspace. So of course the dielectric
Speaker 12: medium is discharged and it actually vanishes into counterspaces moved
Speaker 12: towards counter space. This is the exact same reason why
Speaker 12: all these so called experts field they'd be well heavy
Speaker 12: sized Steinmetz Einstein and the relativeness. They can never understand
Speaker 12: gravity because there's no electro motive force or any sort
Speaker 12: of induction. And it's also too instantaneous action at a
Speaker 12: distance and you can't actually employ.
Speaker 1: The instantaneous action at a distance is another proof of
Speaker 1: an ether medium being present. Otherwise, what is acting upon
Speaker 1: what is the connecting the two instantaneous action at a distance?
Speaker 1: You guys know what I'm talking about. They call it
Speaker 1: spooky action a distance as well.
Speaker 12: It's brain rotting, a mentality that is an interaction between particles.
Speaker 12: That's completely ridiculous. They know it operates iad instant AIU
Speaker 12: section at a distance. That's the reason why they still
Speaker 12: have no idea what gravity is. They cause spooky action
Speaker 12: at a distance. There's no electro motive force involved, there's
Speaker 12: no exchange of information through particles. I think get into
Speaker 12: destructive light. So now we know what lightning fundamentally is.
Speaker 12: It's a discharge, most of which is a discharge in
Speaker 12: the counterspace. It's a dissipation and the energy storage with
Speaker 12: the dielectric torsion it's between the ground and the clouds,
Speaker 12: and the tension that's actually created, which is a discharge
Speaker 12: in the counterspace. Most of that energy does not go
Speaker 12: to ground. And also too, that so called antimatter is
Speaker 12: not the inverse of matter, but just inverse phase of matter,
Speaker 12: no different than destructive interference in the case of the
Speaker 12: dual slit experiment, or constructive and destructive interference in the
Speaker 12: case of light. So in the case of destructive light,
Speaker 12: where does the light energy go? I didn't go anywhere.
Speaker 12: We actually also too, humanity suffers from this crazy idea
Speaker 12: that energy is never created. We've heard all this stuff
Speaker 12: growing up endlessly. Energy is never created or destroyed. It
Speaker 12: only changes form and that's complete and total. BS a
Speaker 12: lot of energy in the early power line transmission steamants
Speaker 12: and heavy side figured it out. It wasn't grounding or
Speaker 12: burning up systems. Enormous tonnages of energy, just enormous, enormous
Speaker 12: amounts were lost. It didn't go anywhere. I mean it
Speaker 12: would have left scorch marks. They would have identified where
Speaker 12: it grounded out. It literally vanished into counterspace. Eric Dollard
Speaker 12: actually talks about this. Some other experts and field theory
Speaker 12: talk about this in early ac power transmission lines. This
Speaker 12: is one of the reasons why Charles Tratty's Steinmants wrote
Speaker 12: Electrical Discharges, Waves and Impulses. He wrote a follow up
Speaker 12: to that of Spurious Currents. And I forget the title
Speaker 12: of the book. It's not archive dot org, which I
Speaker 12: know Archive dot org is being sued right now. I
Speaker 12: know all about that. Everybody keeps sending any emails about that.
Speaker 12: But the one thing that mister two PhDs could have
Speaker 12: figure out, and I have all the respect in the
Speaker 12: world for him, I love his books are so incredibly diligent,
Speaker 12: is he can't figure out the fact that there's no
Speaker 12: cause of link mentioned by James Kirk Maxwell into magnetomoti
Speaker 12: force electromotive force, And the reason for that is because
Speaker 12: it's a conjugate reality between the magnetic and the dielectric.
Speaker 12: And he never so much to suggests that the induced
Speaker 12: currents were a result of changing magnetic fields. On the contrary,
Speaker 12: he clearly associates the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction with changing
Speaker 12: electrical currents. In other words, this idea of causation is absent,
Speaker 12: and he can't figure that out, and neither could anybody
Speaker 12: else will for him. And the simple answer to that,
Speaker 12: because mother Nature is a simple chick wait for it,
Speaker 12: is because there is no cause of relationship. The causation
Speaker 12: is not something separate or cause. It's extrinsic attribute of
Speaker 12: the conjugate system of the entire universe, which is conjugate
Speaker 12: between the magnetic and the dielectric. There is no causation
Speaker 12: in a principal attribute relationship. You know, there is no
Speaker 12: north pole versus a south pole. Northful and south pole.
Speaker 12: In full extrapolation of what it truly is, of course,
Speaker 12: is the universus counterspace. When you have the creation of
Speaker 12: space what do you think a tourist creates. Imagine a
Speaker 12: tourish with a trus Excuse me.
Speaker 1: Which are you familiar with the torial field? You can
Speaker 1: take an Earth model or a human being model, and
Speaker 1: or if you look at his Pharaoh cells, you can
Speaker 1: see it around the magnet it's like and it looks
Speaker 1: like the old like the the oval of a globe model, right,
Speaker 1: but does a hyperboloid in the middle, which is like
Speaker 1: a twisting. The toroidal field is the whole. It's your
Speaker 1: magnetic field around the body, maybe generated by the heart
Speaker 1: some I say making the vortex generator, but that's your field, right,
Speaker 1: And that's what he's referring to. In the toroidal field,
Speaker 1: it looks like a donut. It's crossing lines of a
Speaker 1: magnetic field.
Speaker 12: Starts from nothing really a non Cartesian point source, pure
Speaker 12: dielectricity in counter space and the encounterspace is very appropriate lexicon.
Speaker 12: When you have the expanding taurus, if you will, which
Speaker 12: is kind of like an oblate balloon, what do you
Speaker 12: think that volume of the taurus actually is? That is
Speaker 12: space which has no properties. That's a direct quote from
Speaker 12: Nikola Tesla.
Speaker 1: And because of that magnetism giving things volume. You have
Speaker 1: by definition, a holographic universe.
Speaker 12: When this is present. That is present when you have
Speaker 12: the magnetic field, you have the impotency of energy, the
Speaker 12: absolute impotency, a complete inversion of energy is space, the
Speaker 12: expanding to roidal geometry of the three dimensional force spector,
Speaker 12: that is magnetism, which is the centrifugal force, which is
Speaker 12: actual force. Because gravity is not forced. Gravity is the
Speaker 12: inversion of force. It is of course centerpedal acceleration. Anyway,
Speaker 12: getting onto the destructive interference. By the way, this discovered
Speaker 12: two years ago, made the prediction several years ago that
Speaker 12: they would find out the super hyenergy like created matter.
Speaker 12: So on the destructive destructive interference in the case of
Speaker 12: dueling lasers where they actually crossed and met it a
Speaker 12: point the destructive force spontaneously generated matter. This is what happens.
Speaker 12: They're called galactic jets. I'm also two called astrophysical jets
Speaker 12: for trillions of tons to go look up images. There's
Speaker 12: real images of astrophysical jets also too, called galactic jets
Speaker 12: or the creation of hydrogen. Anyway, when these destructive interference
Speaker 12: between the ultra high power or radiation occurred from the
Speaker 12: lasers which by the way your points flight emissions. Of course,
Speaker 12: this is the reason why lasers are so incredibly dangerous,
Speaker 12: Like I have a five what blue laser? That sucker
Speaker 12: is just dangerous as hell. It'll burn your skin, it'll
Speaker 12: permanently blind you. It was like, what's the difference? It
Speaker 12: is not the qualitative nature? What the quantitative nature? What
Speaker 12: it is? I say to people's like white magnetism fascinate
Speaker 12: people so much.
Speaker 1: So as far as the five what light bulb versus
Speaker 1: the five what laser? It's about coherence, focus in the
Speaker 1: energy rather than dissipated energy. Why one is super powerful
Speaker 1: and dangerous and the other one you can't even see
Speaker 1: under a five watt light bulb. You couldn't read underneath.
Speaker 12: That magnet is not quantitative. It is qualitative. Before a
Speaker 12: magnet becomes a magnet, it is identical. What's happened is
Speaker 12: of course it's qualitative. Nature's shame. Five what light bulb?
Speaker 12: It presses nobody. If you're like living in dirt, you
Speaker 12: know somewhere and you know the desert, Like if you
Speaker 12: have a five live, it's like you complain because it's useless.
Speaker 12: You had a five what laser? Is incredibly useful, it's dangerous,
Speaker 12: it's powerful, it will blind you. Five watts is five watts?
Speaker 12: What's the difference? Same thing with five six? Right, you'll
Speaker 12: make a really crude analogy of a point.
Speaker 1: This is a fascies he's talking about right here, right
Speaker 1: as in fascists fascies. The bundle of sticks together. They
Speaker 1: are strong, bundled together tightly. The closer the bond, the
Speaker 1: longer you become. There's a whole wonderful analogy when it
Speaker 1: comes to fascies and fascism in the sense.
Speaker 12: Right, five sticks, any child could break them right, unimpressive.
Speaker 12: You tie them together and they basically become unbreakable if
Speaker 12: they're thick enough. You know, five sticks is not a
Speaker 12: lot they did for example. Anyway, we have constructive and
Speaker 12: destructive interference. Where laser light was seen to create matter,
Speaker 12: the energy is actually lost in counter space. The destructive
Speaker 12: interference is either dissipated or, in a case of destructive interference,
Speaker 12: is spontaneously generated matter. Where light was amplified, there was
Speaker 12: laser radiation, which was amplified. The actual visible light from
Speaker 12: laser radiation was amplified where light was absent. This was
Speaker 12: discovered two years ago you go look at it, well,
Speaker 12: light was absent. There was the creation of matter a
Speaker 12: spherical frequency i e. Hydrogen. This is exactly what these
Speaker 12: black holes are, meaning trillions and trillion tons of omitting otrogen.
Speaker 12: I'm agreeing with the so called scientists on this or
Speaker 12: emitting trillions of tons of gas hydrogen. But hydrogen is
Speaker 12: just a silly human word for ultra high energy like
Speaker 12: I will also too, quote Eric Dollard in one of
Speaker 12: his books.
Speaker 1: And this is a direct quote I might get it,
Speaker 1: which insidillity makes us literally light beings.
Speaker 12: Super slightly wrong in the exact wording and scass there's
Speaker 12: no way you could understand electrical theory without understanding counterspace.
Speaker 12: And he's exactly correct to have a legend, to understand
Speaker 12: a legend or a you know, in the bottom corner
Speaker 12: of a map, a premer a legend. It makes understanding
Speaker 12: things very simple without understanding counterspace. When you understand counterspace,
Speaker 12: you understand gravity. When you understand counterspace, you understand destructive interference.
Speaker 12: You understand counterspace, you understand the creation of matter. When
Speaker 12: you understand counterspace, you understan and that lightning is not
Speaker 12: a discharge from cloud to ground. That's bys that's what
Speaker 12: human beings observed, Like, oh god, Bob was struck by
Speaker 12: lightning nearly died. It's like, well, you was, but most
Speaker 12: of that energy didn't pass through Bob into the ground.
Speaker 12: It was actually a discharge of the medium into counterspace
Speaker 12: because it's in dielectric medium discharge no different than that
Speaker 12: X ray bombarded election sheets that they actually turn into
Speaker 12: into art. So we explain in simplex antimatter, which is
Speaker 12: just inverse phase matter. We explain destructive interference to light,
Speaker 12: spontaneous creation of matter i e. Hydrogen through destructive interference,
Speaker 12: which was discovered and I predicted many many years ago.
Speaker 12: It was discovered two years ago using ultra high power
Speaker 12: lasers or the destructive interference manifested hydrogen. And it makes
Speaker 12: things really really simple to understand and then also too
Speaker 12: answers the one fundamental question that passes all through this
Speaker 12: is a great book. Another question that passes through this book,
Speaker 12: which is, well, there's no cause of relationship. There is
Speaker 12: no cause of relationship because it's not a cause, it's attribute.
Speaker 12: And the same is true of emanationism. Emanation emanationism that
Speaker 12: is fundamental core is the opposite of creationism, where there's
Speaker 12: like original sin and first cause. There is no first
Speaker 12: cause in creationism, I mean in emanationism. Excuse me order
Speaker 12: the Greek word of protost it's attribute, which is not.
Speaker 1: And if you read the true story from which they butchered,
Speaker 1: brutalized and inverted to create this concept of genesis first
Speaker 1: in Babylon, which would tell you everything about who was
Speaker 1: there when they decided to chop up the story, hacket
Speaker 1: the pieces, and then move all the parts around and
Speaker 1: then invert its meeting, you get this idea of this
Speaker 1: Adam and Eve later on, Yeah, you got part of
Speaker 1: it right. His name was ad Thor or Adam or Arthur.
Speaker 1: The rest of it not so much. There was no
Speaker 1: original sin, therefore there was no need. And this is
Speaker 1: my point that I make with the whole Jesus thing.
Speaker 1: There was nothing to redeem us from everywhere our people went.
Speaker 1: We brought civilization and liberation to protection, community, family. It
Speaker 1: wasn't us who needed to wash away anything. It was
Speaker 1: those people he specifically was in opposition with, in opposition
Speaker 1: to It could have just as well have been anyone
Speaker 1: else from our group of people intervening and trying one
Speaker 1: last time to show the way before they said, okay,
Speaker 1: you're cut off.
Speaker 14: It's it.
Speaker 1: It was sin, but it was. He didn't come after
Speaker 1: the Gothic Arian people. He didn't come after the Germanic people,
Speaker 1: he didn't come after the Chinese. He went to the
Speaker 1: source of the people who had the biggest problem with
Speaker 1: the rest of mankind, who were living in the exact
Speaker 1: inversion of what they should be living as, and causing
Speaker 1: harm and being predators and being schemers, living all in
Speaker 1: the wrong way. They're the ones who have the sin.
Speaker 1: They're the ones who mess around with demons. We take
Speaker 1: this upon ourselves and internalize it as it's our problem.
Speaker 1: It's mankind's human condition. Oh it isn't. There was no
Speaker 1: Eve deceiving Adam or snake thing. It was a serpent
Speaker 1: cult reduced to a snake symbol for the sake of
Speaker 1: storytelling from the very serpent cult that's telling the story
Speaker 1: about the day the time that they got the ass
Speaker 1: is handed to them. But they're not telling it that way.
Speaker 1: They're lying about the depiction and saying that's the creation
Speaker 1: of the dawn of man, maybe because what they were
Speaker 1: doing before then was so hideous. They want people to
Speaker 1: think the world started then, not.
Speaker 12: Cause, But it's like, what's the cause? There is no cause.
Speaker 12: So that's the answer to the big riddle that's asked
Speaker 12: many many times by the author, very brilliant man in
Speaker 12: this book, which is a great read, by the way.
Speaker 1: Okay, so that one's that one. Let's see if we
Speaker 1: can knock out another one.
Speaker 12: Here.
Speaker 1: There's two that I like that I was listening to earlier.
Speaker 1: Now this one's hello as long as this one. This
Speaker 1: one's a longer one, but it's good. It's hard to
Speaker 1: what is the energy inertia and ether. Let's go for
Speaker 1: as long as we can with this one, all right,
Speaker 1: then we'll jump in the other one. What time we
Speaker 1: got What do you talk about, Frank, Let's see what
Speaker 1: you're get babbling the bout. Oh yeah, yeah, we no, no, no,
Speaker 1: No instantaneous action at a distance happens because there's any
Speaker 1: theory in between. Now, he's not a freemason, dude, Okay,
Speaker 1: well you just elected to be gone. He's don't disrupt
Speaker 1: my show. I don't take it kindly.
Speaker 14: Do it.
Speaker 1: Done? I think that person was talking to the other guy.
Speaker 1: And if you're not, you'll go next. If you don't
Speaker 1: like what you're seeing here, go somewhere else. But that
Speaker 1: guy is not a freemason. He's, if anything, is a neoplatonist,
Speaker 1: and he's not the same as a freemason. And it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what labels you a place on somebody. He's
Speaker 1: telling you the nature of things. And you don't like
Speaker 1: that because and then you say the thing about the
Speaker 1: instantaneous action additions distance that actually works and it's provable.
Speaker 1: That's why they don't understand it because they don't because
Speaker 1: they reject the ether. It's not a question of as
Speaker 1: to whether or not instantaneous action at a distance is
Speaker 1: a thing. It's the fact that they give you a
Speaker 1: stupid reasoning for it, and they talk about quantum bullshit
Speaker 1: and particles and all this other nonsense. So you're your
Speaker 1: your push your place, seeing your objection in the wrong place.
Speaker 1: It's like when people aren't smart enough to understand why
Speaker 1: they shouldn't like Trumps and they say something about you know,
Speaker 1: they noly don't like like the like the liberals in
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen to twenty twenty right, Like, there's plenty
Speaker 1: of reasons to be very suspicious of this wicked bastard
Speaker 1: who you know, put the no knock raids, the uh
Speaker 1: red flag laws on steroids, and did lots of other things.
Speaker 1: Take the guns first, due process second. Lots of reasons
Speaker 1: they dislike him, but the liberals aren't gonna dislike him
Speaker 1: for that because they don't like guns. So they had
Speaker 1: some retarded reasons, you know, that had no substance to them.
Speaker 1: And it's kind it's kind of what that argument was there. Hey,
Speaker 1: school sca, you scot whatever the hell that is. H
Speaker 1: Let me know what exactly it is you're saying. Are
Speaker 1: you talking to me the other guy? Be interesting to know.
Speaker 1: I think you were talking to Frank Noble. That's funny.
Speaker 1: Pretty sure you were. I'm under the impression that you are.
Speaker 1: And then you probably bounce and maybe you're talking to me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. The answer is uh, I don't think so.
Speaker 1: Pretty sure I'm not. And not much said over here
Speaker 1: on that side. It's it's a crazy how when people
Speaker 1: It's like I've told you, nobody wants to hear truth.
Speaker 1: They want to be reinforced in the things that they
Speaker 1: already decided that they believe, and because they believe them,
Speaker 1: it's the truth. So they're they're just looking for a
Speaker 1: specific camp to side with the things that have already
Speaker 1: been said and that sound familiar to them. Is they
Speaker 1: don't have the They don't even have the inner compass
Speaker 1: to say this resonates with me. They don't have it.
Speaker 1: They just don't. They don't have it. The only thing,
Speaker 1: the only way things resonate with them is false resonation.
Speaker 1: It's the familiarity of hearing something you've heard before. Don't
Speaker 1: take that analogy too far as to say that this
Speaker 1: man is all truth. So it's funny. How isn't it funny?
Speaker 1: How people do this? They look at Oh he's a
Speaker 1: fat guy. Oh he has a he has a southern accent.
Speaker 1: Oh look he has chevrons on his fingers and he
Speaker 1: has mathematical freaking diagrams on his hands. He must be
Speaker 1: a freemason. He's not a freemason. And this is what
Speaker 1: they do instead of because they're not smart enough to
Speaker 1: argue what he's talking about, so they so they say
Speaker 1: something ridiculous like instantaneous actually at a distance is a
Speaker 1: Jewish lie. No, it isn't. It's the principle of a
Speaker 1: lot of different things. Actually, Uh, what some people will
Speaker 1: call a quantum entanglement. It isn't. But why your DNA
Speaker 1: sample is a dangerous thing to have in the hands
Speaker 1: of other people, and why you should never have given
Speaker 1: your DNA sample twenty three and meters because of instantaneous
Speaker 1: section at that distance. That that's that's one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why you shouldn't have had done that. Part of
Speaker 1: you is you, So if somebody has a part of you,
Speaker 1: they can affect the whole.
Speaker 12: Oh do reading some salutations on this fine evening? You
Speaker 12: if I clean my glasses for five seconds really quick?
Speaker 12: Four three, two one, There we go.
Speaker 1: Let's if can get past the babble. Yeah, no, you
Speaker 1: never do that.
Speaker 12: It is the case that no branch of science has
Speaker 12: actually ever defined the term energy. You can say, well,
Speaker 12: you can look up on Wikipedia. Energy is the ability
Speaker 12: to do work that actually doesn't tell you what energy is.
Speaker 12: A branch of science ever defined the term energy. They
Speaker 12: never define the term feel.
Speaker 1: And transically, so description of an observation is not the
Speaker 1: same thing as an explanation, and an explanation is not
Speaker 1: the same thing as a description of your observation, and
Speaker 1: an observation can just because you're observing something, if you're
Speaker 1: missing data as to what you're observing. You can still
Speaker 1: have that observation be wrong. You might not be seeing
Speaker 1: what you think you're seeing. There's a lot of things
Speaker 1: variables here, and you might conclude that one thing begt
Speaker 1: the other in a different cause and effect relationship than
Speaker 1: what actually was present, especially when you're not really looking
Speaker 1: at the problem, but you're looking at your math that's
Speaker 1: trying to explain it, and you're going off on a
Speaker 1: trail because the math is forcing you to stay within
Speaker 1: its parameters rather than experiencing the natural effect of what
Speaker 1: you're watching or what you're observing.
Speaker 12: Well, they're outright reject the ether, but they're replaced with something.
Speaker 1: So it's like code, right, If you start off with
Speaker 1: the wrong type of script for your code, then somewhere
Speaker 1: down the line you're gonna have an issue.
Speaker 12: I think that's completely impossible, inaccurate, and laughable. That is,
Speaker 12: of course, atomism and relativity another one. People like to
Speaker 12: use the word quantum too. By the way, you know,
Speaker 12: there's nothing in nature that you can point to you
Speaker 12: and say that's quantum, right there, There is nothing in
Speaker 12: nature that you can call quantum. But this video is
Speaker 12: not about quantum rather about energy. So people are arguing
Speaker 12: whether energy is a concept or whether it's a property
Speaker 12: of something. These physicists will say it's a number where
Speaker 12: you can find a Wikipedia. It's the ability to do work,
Speaker 12: which is not descriptive of the term energy. All of these,
Speaker 12: of course, are completely inaccurate. People too, like people, I mean,
Speaker 12: all of humanity. It's completely confused. It's an actual metaph
Speaker 12: physical axiom that humanity sees everything upside down and backwards.
Speaker 12: People of course are always confusing principle with attributional self division,
Speaker 12: like the use of really simple rubber band analogy here
Speaker 12: in a second. But people confuse potential energy with kinetic energy.
Speaker 12: But the kinetic energy that everybody points to, like you know,
Speaker 12: mushroom cloud from a fissionable lump of uranium or plutonium,
Speaker 12: that's not energy. That's the impotency, the complete opposite of energy,
Speaker 12: the dissipation of energy we point to. It's not energy,
Speaker 12: but that's what everybody calls energy. That's representational of the
Speaker 12: energy that exists. And people get confused when they say, like,
Speaker 12: I'm creating new definitions for stuff like inertia. The original
Speaker 12: definition for inertia, but that's the original definition of pure
Speaker 12: non partiesian potential. In other words, inert kind of like
Speaker 12: a softball sized lump of plutonium or iranium would be,
Speaker 12: you know, in its current state in Earth. The thing
Speaker 12: is true of the ether potential. Of course, creates a
Speaker 12: lot of different confusions. It's like the get here too.
Speaker 12: But that's the original definition of energy inertia. We use
Speaker 12: it actually a different fashion today connotatively, like forward inertia
Speaker 12: and inertia relative to kinematic timeframes and whatnot. But that's
Speaker 12: not the definition of energy. Light illumination is another perfect one. Light,
Speaker 12: of course is the principle, and illumination is its extrinsic attribute. Elimination,
Speaker 12: of course, is the energy is manifest. That energy, of course,
Speaker 12: is a division of light, unless, of course it is
Speaker 12: point source light, for it is a coherent light. That's
Speaker 12: another matter, but it's still it is going forth. It's
Speaker 12: the attributional nature, the extransic side of light. Because nobody
Speaker 12: sees light, for example, they see, of course, illimination. So
Speaker 12: we have principle an attribute.
Speaker 1: And the illumination is because it's a agitation of the ether,
Speaker 1: it's a field perbation.
Speaker 12: We have a polarization of what is inert what is
Speaker 12: inert i et inertia pure potential and the case of
Speaker 12: the ether, that is non Cartesian pure potential. The ether,
Speaker 12: of course it's not a particle, is not composed of things,
Speaker 12: which would be contrary to the very definition of the
Speaker 12: term inertia or of the ether. Excuse me an inertia
Speaker 12: and ether one on the same thing. There were different
Speaker 12: means of describing about pure potential, which has no Cartesian value,
Speaker 12: and then of course confuses scientists, which yield an objective reality.
Speaker 12: But of course objective reality is technically unreal, but that's
Speaker 12: a matter for discussing holography, the holography of the universe.
Speaker 12: So polarization of inertia is energy. This is of course
Speaker 12: potential snap back and the dissipation of rest as kinetic energy.
Speaker 12: Like a rubber band. I like that. I don't have
Speaker 12: a rubber band in front of me. I don't know
Speaker 12: if you've ever actually pulled a rubber band. Well, everybody
Speaker 12: has pulled a rubber band back, especially if you let
Speaker 12: it cut it in half and you have you have
Speaker 12: a stretched rubber band across your lip. You actually feel
Speaker 12: this heat and as you actually let it contract back
Speaker 12: to its inertial or its rest point. You actually have
Speaker 12: a dual entity here in the case of light and
Speaker 12: an energy. Even being is confused potential energy and connectic energy.
Speaker 12: But kinetic energy is not energy. It's the inverse of energy,
Speaker 12: I eat, the dissipation of energy. I mean, you're actually
Speaker 12: pulling a rubber band apart. You're actually creating a disparity
Speaker 12: where of course you have a contractive potential that is
Speaker 12: being built up where it wants to return to its
Speaker 12: inertial point. This is, by the way, this original definition
Speaker 12: inertia pure potential. But of course measuring potential, it's not
Speaker 12: measurable because it has no Cartesian value. Of course, we
Speaker 12: can say x number of grams of potassium nitrate has
Speaker 12: x amount of jewels of potential energy, which of course
Speaker 12: we're measurable because we have past experience and past experiences
Speaker 12: and chemical reactions of certain things like potassium nitrate and
Speaker 12: all sorts of chemical reactions. Of of course, we can
Speaker 12: actually no potential measured in jewels, watts, bolts, and so
Speaker 12: on and so forth. So energy is not a what.
Speaker 12: Rather in most cases, of of course how, But the
Speaker 12: how is manifest isn't never energy, rather the dissipation of energy.
Speaker 12: Once again, energy is capacity, and of course capacitance is
Speaker 12: inertia or rest. It is inert No energy is being
Speaker 12: expressed if we, of course have history with this particular
Speaker 12: object or medium, as is the case of the ether,
Speaker 12: because an ac generator, by the way, it doesn't degenerate power.
Speaker 12: It manifests power by introducing into variant. In the case
Speaker 12: it gets the copper reflector in a magnetic field, and
Speaker 12: you introduce a temporal variable, you have the manifestation of electricity,
Speaker 12: and of course the guidelines along which it is directed.
Speaker 12: But it is not actually generating anything. I've spoken about
Speaker 12: this in other videos anyway. Pure potential, this of course
Speaker 12: is the definition of the ether. Energy as capacitance, capacitance
Speaker 12: of what is inert the inertia or rest, potential or
Speaker 12: position excuse me, position as potential. Energy of course is
Speaker 12: a lot. Actually, I've been reading this growing up, and
Speaker 12: you were taught the same nonsense, like if you stick
Speaker 12: a car on the top of a hill, it has
Speaker 12: greater potential. If I take this stone actually not a
Speaker 12: stone's piece of lead and I actually elevate it, we'll
Speaker 12: say it actually has a greater potential energy. Changing the
Speaker 12: position of something does not change. They will actually say,
Speaker 12: and you can find countless styusands of websites on pandemic
Speaker 12: websites of universities of physics labs. Well, it changed the position,
Speaker 12: changed the potential energy. It has more potential energy, like
Speaker 12: taking a super huge rock and sticking up on the
Speaker 12: edge of the cliff that has greater potential to smash
Speaker 12: something underneath it. The potential energy is of course not possessed.
Speaker 12: You can't say by changing the location of one thing
Speaker 12: relative to the other, such as the Earth relative to rock,
Speaker 12: or this particular lead ball relative to the Earth, changes
Speaker 12: the potential energy, or that the potential energy of this
Speaker 12: saying has changed. I mean, that's completely ludicrous, and it
Speaker 12: fascinates me that the ineptitude of these people that would
Speaker 12: actually think that you've actually changed something of the attribution
Speaker 12: or qualitative nature of something by changing its location. This
Speaker 12: is completely ludicrous. Position, of course, is not property of
Speaker 12: either objects. Rather, the potential is declared of the field
Speaker 12: torsion relative between the two objects in the case of
Speaker 12: a rock or bolder or this lead ball and the
Speaker 12: Earth in the case of mutual mass acceleration by changing
Speaker 12: its position, but nothing of the property, or the quality
Speaker 12: or the attributes of any object has changed. Keeping it simple,
Speaker 12: since we can know that humanity always sees everything upside
Speaker 12: down and backwards. When we see impotency of energy is energy,
Speaker 12: and it is not energy at all, because true energy
Speaker 12: is inert it is inertia. Once again, I've had several
Speaker 12: people recently talking about inertia. So oh, I, oh, you
Speaker 12: try to redefine the term inertia. It's like, that's actually
Speaker 12: the original definition of the term inertia. I eat energy.
Speaker 12: The field, of course is and ether perturbation modality. As
Speaker 12: I've said a thousands of times, the ether is inertial.
Speaker 12: It is, of course the media. Energy, of course is inertia.
Speaker 12: True energy, not the impotency of energy. Energy of course
Speaker 12: is the division or parceling out of inertia. And that,
Speaker 12: of course is the impotency of the energy. But it's
Speaker 12: what all humanity identifies as energy where work is being done.
Speaker 12: But when work is being done, you've created the division
Speaker 12: or parceling of inertia. In the case of a rubber band,
Speaker 12: you actually have to exert energy to stretch that rubber
Speaker 12: band out. But when you stretch that rubber ban out
Speaker 12: and you parcel out, it's inertial rest You create another disparity,
Speaker 12: which of course is always dual, just as the case
Speaker 12: of a magnet sild magnet has an earth pul and
Speaker 12: a sealth pool. It's of a dual nature. It's not.
Speaker 12: It's the un versus counterspace. Counterspace is inertia is the
Speaker 12: rest point. And stretching out that rubber band, yeah, and
Speaker 12: dissipating energy. When, of course you stretched rubber band across
Speaker 12: your lip. Everybody should do that. It's great, a little
Speaker 12: science experiment for kids. Like you stretch it out across
Speaker 12: your lip, it feels hot, and when you let it
Speaker 12: contract against your lip, it, of course it feels cold.
Speaker 1: It doesn't feel hot anymore, I don't know. It feels
Speaker 1: cold when you.
Speaker 12: Stretch that rubber ban out. Are you not also too
Speaker 12: inducing the polarization of the energy or inertia of the
Speaker 12: rubber band, Yes, because if you let go of the
Speaker 12: rubber band and it will want to send back towards
Speaker 12: this inertial mode or its rest point, which is inert
Speaker 12: polarization of both energy and the polarization of what people
Speaker 12: call magnetism. These are all one on the exact same thing,
Speaker 12: force in motion, inertian acceleration, the dissipation of force or
Speaker 12: inertia I either dielectric or the plane of inertia manifesting
Speaker 12: is the centerfugal force. Spector Walter Russell called this the
Speaker 12: dissipation of energy along east west. But east west he
Speaker 12: means centrifugal. I mean, he says north south. He's referring
Speaker 12: to centripedal i e. Increasing inertia acceleration towards the point
Speaker 12: of inertia or rest. Did you know that most lead
Speaker 12: in the earth, something like ninety eight percent of lead
Speaker 12: used to be uranium. Yeah, the rest of uranium through
Speaker 12: its half life where it turns into lead, through the
Speaker 12: release of radiation, the center fugel release both of gamma
Speaker 12: radiation and alpha particle emission. It's rest inertia. Is this
Speaker 12: I actually have it covered in in a rubber tape.
Speaker 12: But this is the ball of lead. Actually, this is
Speaker 12: the inertial point of most uranium. Well, that is not
Speaker 12: a naturally occurring element in the universe. It is the
Speaker 12: rest no inertial mass varia of the actual.
Speaker 1: See he said noll. There the center point of a
Speaker 1: magnet is the null point. There is no there's no
Speaker 1: pull one with the other, there's no U. The n
Speaker 1: point of the magnet would be a space where you
Speaker 1: don't feel h any force from any direction. Looking for
Speaker 1: the words, it's at rest.
Speaker 12: Basically the periodic table elemental rest inertia of uranium. All
Speaker 12: uranium turns into lead. So energy is the division or
Speaker 12: the parceling of inertia. So let's make this really simple,
Speaker 12: since we now know what energy is and what it
Speaker 12: is not. It's certainly another concept. It's not a property,
Speaker 12: it's not a numbers. These quantum folks like to talk about.
Speaker 12: The ability to do work does not define energy. I
Speaker 12: think say a horse can pull hey, or a horse
Speaker 12: can pull a carriage. Well, this is true, and that's wonderful,
Speaker 12: makes horses useful, but that doesn't tell you what the
Speaker 12: hell of horses. Light and illumination. Let's get back to
Speaker 12: the really simple analogy principle and attribute. Energy is the
Speaker 12: parcel or attributional or extrinsic side of the inertia point
Speaker 12: of a medium. Of course, light is a complex fuel modality,
Speaker 12: which of course is no different than an ether pertivation modality.
Speaker 12: But what's the inertial point of light? Well, what causes
Speaker 12: light to manifest the release of energy? Nobody sees light
Speaker 12: once again, they only see illumination. So it's the division
Speaker 12: of inertia. The division of inertia is seen in the
Speaker 12: polarity of a magnet. It is seen between the conjugate
Speaker 12: fields of magnetism and dielectricity, which makes up that which
Speaker 12: human beings call electricity. The very very simple thing that
Speaker 12: human beings call electricity, as Charles prodi'stemitz I really said,
Speaker 12: is the consubstantiality of magnetism and electricity. But magnetism is
Speaker 12: no different than saying the energy impotency of the loss
Speaker 12: of energy the dielectric But these two in consubstantiality make
Speaker 12: bi time cycles, cube and blank of electrication that which
Speaker 12: human beings called electricity. When you understand what electricity is
Speaker 12: as a compound conjugate, explaining how an electromagnet works becomes
Speaker 12: really easy. Explaining electrical phenomena becomes really really simple instead
Speaker 12: of really really complicated. There's all these things that electrical
Speaker 12: engineers are told to believe in which are true, but
Speaker 12: they don't easily explain electricity. But if you understand what
Speaker 12: electricity is as this hybrid consubstantiality between magnetism and electricity,
Speaker 12: which are a conjugate whole, then understanding is phenomena becomes
Speaker 12: incredibly easy. So this impediency of energy, I eat, true
Speaker 12: energy is inertia. It is inertial, I inert inert inertia
Speaker 12: people in human beings, human beings, people really really really
Speaker 12: hard time wrapping their mind around something that has no
Speaker 12: Cartesian value or footprint, something so totally inert that you
Speaker 12: wave your hand through it. You know, fish don't realize
Speaker 12: they're swimming in water. Human beings when they wave their
Speaker 12: hand don't realize they're you know, flapping their you know,
Speaker 12: running their hand through pure potential like e inertia. This
Speaker 12: is the reason why AC generators don't generate power. When
Speaker 12: you introduce a temple variant against the dialect reflector copper
Speaker 12: widening using a magnetic field spontaneously from the medium of
Speaker 12: which it is a medium modality, electricity manifests. An AC
Speaker 12: generator is not a generator at all. It doesn't make something.
Speaker 12: It makes something appear, which by definition is magic. But
Speaker 12: you know you're conjuring up something this invisible line between
Speaker 12: physics and metaphysics dis ap peers when you truly and
Speaker 12: genuinely understand just one little aspect of which but there
Speaker 12: are many different examples that. Well, you see, generator doesn't
Speaker 12: generate power and manifest power when you truly understand that
Speaker 12: all of humanity is everything upside down backwards.
Speaker 1: They see the that's the oive method, right, invert everything.
Speaker 12: Impotency or release of energy as energy. It's the total
Speaker 12: opposite of that. They don't understand that this thing between
Speaker 12: my hands forgetting the oxygen and nitrogen I the medium
Speaker 12: is the place that has no place with no.
Speaker 1: Cartesian So if existence is one way, they have elected
Speaker 1: to make everything inverted. So they are the destroyers of existence.
Speaker 1: They are the lingo leaders.
Speaker 12: Value in which power manifests given the specific arch form
Speaker 12: that human beings called an ac you know ac motor.
Speaker 12: This is what Eric Dollard meant in saying all these
Speaker 12: ac motors were nothing other than arch forms Indian Ancient
Speaker 12: Egyptian ancient Indian arch forms. The freaking dream catcher of
Speaker 12: the I think in the Navajo were the first two
Speaker 12: represent the dream catchers that could be wrought on the
Speaker 12: Native Americans. That's an archetype of the magneto dielectric constructive
Speaker 12: and destructive interference between magnetism and electricity. That you've seen
Speaker 12: it over a thousand plus Pharaoh cell videos that I
Speaker 12: myself of the NME over a thousand other.
Speaker 1: The Pharaoh cell shows the toroital field around the magnet.
Speaker 12: Power is rest inert inertia. Power is just nothing other
Speaker 12: than a euphemism for energy. This is the reason why
Speaker 12: these scientists and these materialists, these atomists, they even Richard
Speaker 12: Feiedmann said, if anybody tells you they understand what I think,
Speaker 12: he is Richard Freiman system to the fact that no
Speaker 12: branch of science today can tell you what energy is.
Speaker 12: And he's right, because they can't comprehend it. Comprehend it.
Speaker 12: Excuse me, still have a little bit of cough left.
Speaker 12: Genuine energy or power. Another euphemism thereof.
Speaker 1: Is the ether.
Speaker 12: No Cartesian value. It is completely inert in its rest,
Speaker 12: it is inert. The rest of uranium is this lead.
Speaker 12: Lead is not a naturally occurring element. It is the
Speaker 12: depletion of uranium. You go look up if you don't
Speaker 12: believe me. But nobody's taught this stuff in high school
Speaker 12: or college. It is really really simple, because nature is
Speaker 12: that simple. And yet I do not joke when I
Speaker 12: tell you that no branch of science has ever defined
Speaker 12: the term field, and they are sure as hell have
Speaker 12: never defined the term energy. They themselves admit this. They said, well,
Speaker 12: energy is potential or it's kinetic. If it's kinetic, it
Speaker 12: is the inverse of energy, and it is potential. We're
Speaker 12: talking about something that's completely inert unless we know, well,
Speaker 12: X number of grams of potassium nitrate has x amount
Speaker 12: of a potential kinetic release of energy, not energy itself.
Speaker 1: You know, that's.
Speaker 12: That's history, that's what we've learned. This minigrams of so
Speaker 12: and so chemical element will have this many jewles, watts
Speaker 12: amps of release of energy. We said release of energy.
Speaker 12: We're not meaning energy rather than the impotency of energy.
Speaker 12: So energy is really simple, and yet it is so
Speaker 12: sublime and actually confuses the hell out of all of academia.
Speaker 14: Energy is not a concept, it's not a number, it's
Speaker 14: not a property, and human beings really have a hard
Speaker 14: time wrapping their mind around something that is completely inert.
Speaker 12: Such as the ether. Here we have one cubic meter
Speaker 12: of ether, a little bit bigger than that. There's nothing there.
Speaker 12: You wave your hand through it, you can't feel it. Yeah,
Speaker 12: but when you stick an arch for a minute and
Speaker 12: you vary the magnetic feel with respect to time, this
Speaker 12: one cubic meter of ether will produce a tremendous amount
Speaker 12: of electricity because the AC generator is not generating like
Speaker 12: baking a cake where you're building some of it. AC
Speaker 12: generator is not making electricity, is causing electricity to extrude
Speaker 12: from the ether itself. Just like when you squeeze a
Speaker 12: tube of toothpaste. Imagine some cave man. You sit there
Speaker 12: and you know, play with the tube of toothpaste all
Speaker 12: I want, but it's like, well, yes, unscrew the top
Speaker 12: and squeeze it and then the stuff comes out. Well,
Speaker 12: when you have an arch form and you're very the
Speaker 12: magnetic field with respect to time, this is he if
Speaker 12: you went back before the days of AC generators one
Speaker 12: hundred and fifty years somewhere around there, say I have
Speaker 12: one cubic meter of ether right here, and from it
Speaker 12: I can get enough power to power a small city.
Speaker 12: I mean they laugh at you like you were nuts. Yeah,
Speaker 12: but I have to have an arch form with a
Speaker 12: specific geometry very the magnetic field the time, and this
Speaker 12: one cubic meter of ether will produce prodigious amounts of electricity.
Speaker 12: Oh you're crazy, yeah, but that's exactly how it works.
Speaker 12: This is the reason why all over a heavy side
Speaker 12: upstead of the large ac motors is tied churning up
Speaker 12: the ether, which is exactly what's happening, like squeezing the
Speaker 12: toothpaste in the case, the toothpaste of the electricity. It's
Speaker 12: been squeezed from the ether, and it's the ether itself.
Speaker 12: It's an ether perturbation, metality, electricity is and a hybrid thereof.
Speaker 12: Also that sounds mystical and magical. The only reason why
Speaker 12: it sounds that way is because there is no dividing
Speaker 12: line between physics and metaphysics. These people can't define energy
Speaker 12: and they can't define a field, and yet they want
Speaker 12: to divide physics and metaphysics like they're two different things.
Speaker 12: I mean, well, that's just intellectual lunacy. Anyway, the rest
Speaker 12: of my case, I'd love to talk about this subject,
Speaker 12: I hope.
Speaker 1: Okay, hey body sleepy, Yeah yeah it isn't you for
Speaker 1: another thirteen thirteen minutes. This one made uh, this one's
Speaker 1: more short and sweet.
Speaker 19: If you.
Speaker 1: Still nothing on this one? Made all right? We got
Speaker 1: over an FTJ nothing all right, no one's talking today.
Speaker 1: Let's see over here, get anything on YouTube? You all right?
Speaker 1: One more then we'll go on. Said something else? Okay,
Speaker 1: this one, if I remember correctly from real learning today,
Speaker 1: when I listened to it again, it kind of brings
Speaker 1: home the points of the other two in a more
Speaker 1: compact for him. Oh many sq tips in the corner,
Speaker 1: probably for cleaning a machine.
Speaker 12: That's the first degree.
Speaker 1: Now this one's six years older. Think thing.
Speaker 12: Okay, since electricity runs absolutely every damn yes we use
Speaker 12: in life, right, you'd think they know what electricity is.
Speaker 12: But what if we knew what electricity was exactly? Well,
Speaker 12: actually earlier than that anyway, talking about Charles proty Steinmetz's
Speaker 12: book from nineteen seventeen, I believe it is or nineteen
Speaker 12: eighteen Electrical Discharges, Waves and Impulses. I don't know why
Speaker 12: I have this clipboard out of here. I have these
Speaker 12: quotes memorized nearly, you know, completely in my head without
Speaker 12: having to quote my damn clipboard. And let me first
Speaker 12: also start off by stating that I am absolutely in
Speaker 12: no way, shape or form, and don't be insulted by this.
Speaker 12: But I really don't like conspiracy people, and I am
Speaker 12: myself absolutely not a damn conspiracy person. Okay, let me
Speaker 12: state that again. I'm not a conspiracy person, and I
Speaker 12: kind of always roll my eyes when I hear conspiracy.
Speaker 12: That's not to say that obviously real conspiracies don't exist,
Speaker 12: because they obviously damn well do, right, They obviously must
Speaker 12: exist by definition. I mean, the reason why we have
Speaker 12: the CIA in the NSA and places like Area fifty
Speaker 12: one and the Russians have their own version of Area
Speaker 12: fifty one is to keep things from people. So what
Speaker 12: about electricity being conspiracy understanding of which would help us
Speaker 12: understand field theory a lot better. I mean people that
Speaker 12: actually I don't know if you know who Charles proty
Speaker 12: steinments is. If you don't, then you need to slap
Speaker 12: your physics teacher and professor because they've ever told you.
Speaker 12: They told you who that idiot Einstein was. And I'm
Speaker 12: calling Einstein an idiot because Nikola Tesla called him a
Speaker 12: fuzzy haired crack pod, an idiot, and a lot of
Speaker 12: other things, So I'm only quoting Nikola Tesla and calling
Speaker 12: an Einstein an idiot. But back in nineteen seventeen, Charles
Speaker 12: prody steinments who, by the way, perfected the AC generator,
Speaker 12: Nikola Tesla and most brilliant person in electrical field theory
Speaker 12: to have lived right beside it. A lot of people
Speaker 12: have heard of Tesla. Everybody's heard of Einstein. There's tons
Speaker 12: of people have never heard of Tesla that should have.
Speaker 12: We all kind of know this if you're watching this
Speaker 12: damn video. But if you don't know who Charles prody
Speaker 12: Stein Metz is, then you really need to slap your teacher. Anyway,
Speaker 12: Absolutely brilliant genius, incredibly inventive, not as inventive as Nicola Tesla's,
Speaker 12: but incredibly brilliant. And he himself and in the nineteen
Speaker 12: seventeen was talking about people conflating what electricity is. Now
Speaker 12: everybody today talks about electricity and basically nobody understands what
Speaker 12: the hell dielectricity is centrally electro stacks. But if you
Speaker 12: mentioned the word dielectricity, what the hell are you talking about?
Speaker 12: Did you invent some sort of new free energy bullshit?
Speaker 12: It's like, are you kidding me? The people that actually
Speaker 12: built the entire electrical world, that being Tesla fair Day, Steinmetz,
Speaker 12: James Kirk, Maxwell, Oliver heavy Sight. These are JJ Thompson
Speaker 12: also pardon me, these are entire within everything that they
Speaker 12: write about over and over in dielectricity. You ever heard
Speaker 12: the word dielectricity other than from my lips? Probably not.
Speaker 12: I've even talked with a lot of actual electrical engineers
Speaker 12: that only heard the word in passing like once as
Speaker 12: an electrical engineer, just like passed over their heads, like
Speaker 12: I've heard of that word, but nobody ever discusses it anyway.
Speaker 12: The only we can have a proper understanding of field
Speaker 12: theory electric staty. It's also too gravity and gravity does
Speaker 12: not exist. I'm not saying the phenomenon of gravity doesn't exist.
Speaker 12: I'm saying gravity is autonomous fuel medality does not exist.
Speaker 12: What we call gravity is the exact same thing the
Speaker 12: COMMUNITYOT calls magnetic attraction. But there's another thing is magnetic attraction.
Speaker 12: It is dielectric acceleration of the differentiation between gravity and
Speaker 12: its so called magnetic attraction is coherence to your point
Speaker 12: source gravity. For example, the phenomena we call gravity is
Speaker 12: incoherent non point source dielectric acceleration right incoherent to dielectric
Speaker 12: acceleration what we call magnetic attraction, which is not mytism
Speaker 12: at all. In his point source or coherent dielectric acceleration,
Speaker 12: all of this is within the sphere i e. Gravity,
Speaker 12: and so called magnetic attraction is within this sphere of dielectrics. Okay, Now,
Speaker 12: if we've been taught dielectrics for the past hundred years,
Speaker 12: let me give you a quote from exactly one hundred
Speaker 12: years ago from Charles party Stein Mess in his book
Speaker 12: Electrical Discharges, Wats and Impulses. I believe this is on
Speaker 12: page twelve of the book, huge book. I can't believe.
Speaker 12: I remember what page's on. Many textbooks speak of the
Speaker 12: electrical charges on conductors, meaning ac lines, you know, running
Speaker 12: down the street, conductors in the energy stored by them,
Speaker 12: without considering that the dielectric energy is not on the
Speaker 12: surfaces conductor, but in the space outside in between the conductors,
Speaker 12: just as it's also magnetic energy. He also goes on
Speaker 12: in another quote to talk about how people have conflated
Speaker 12: electricity and they don't understand what it is. I forget
Speaker 12: where that quote is that. I don't want to quote
Speaker 12: him incorrectly, So I was trying to look for the
Speaker 12: exact quote on here, which I should probably should have,
Speaker 12: But he essentially says is that people don't understand electricity.
Speaker 12: They've conflated it and misunderstand what electricity is, and they
Speaker 12: talk about electricity and overtly complicated the understanding of electricity.
Speaker 12: Nothing Actually give you a direct quote from him on
Speaker 12: this book. Also, magnetic and dielectric fields I E. Five
Speaker 12: types equals Q and plank of electrification. Literally, magnetism times dielectricity.
Speaker 12: Electrostatics equals Q and plank of electrification. In other words, electricity, okay,
Speaker 12: is the offspring of the conjunction of dielectricity and magnetism.
Speaker 12: Electricity is not an existent, singularity, single thing. People, Well,
Speaker 12: it's electricity a pluging in the wall. It's not electricity electricity, Sure,
Speaker 12: it is electricity. What the hell are you talking about?
Speaker 12: Fat ball tattooed read deeply here, meaning me. Electricity is
Speaker 12: a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism. This is what makes
Speaker 12: up the phenomena we call electricity. The magnetic and the
Speaker 12: electric field of conductors are both included in the terms
Speaker 12: electrical field and are in the two components of the
Speaker 12: term electrical field. Charles proty steinmans, there's a famous picture
Speaker 12: of him, and I should have brought it up, priest.
Speaker 12: He's a little person. Okay, we don't use the word
Speaker 12: midget anymore, of course, the little person completely crooked at
Speaker 12: the hip and smoke big old cigars. And he's standing
Speaker 12: in front of a crowd of some of the smartest
Speaker 12: people who ever lived. Unfortunately, Einstein was in him and
Speaker 12: directly standing behind in him, but also Nikola Tesla was
Speaker 12: stating behind Nils Bore the best electrical geniuses. He's not
Speaker 12: in front because he's the shortest person, and obviously when
Speaker 12: you take a photograph, you put the short person in front.
Speaker 12: Now he's in front because he's the genius and the
Speaker 12: ring master of all of those people behind him, including Einstein,
Speaker 12: including Tesla, Niels.
Speaker 3: Boor on and on and on and on.
Speaker 12: He was the genius. If you've ever read some of it,
Speaker 12: one of Charles proty Steinitz's equations is thirty two pages
Speaker 12: one goddamn equation. Excuse my language, is thirty two pages
Speaker 12: one equation. Tell me how stupid do you think? Charles
Speaker 12: toroty' stegmentz is you do any investigation of the guy
Speaker 12: at all? Oh my god, why have I never heard
Speaker 12: of this person? This is Charles Trody's Steinmitz in his
Speaker 12: book Bitching about how people do not understand what electricity is.
Speaker 12: They've conflated electricity as a singular entity and replaced it
Speaker 12: with dielectricity and magnetism as the conjunct which actually make
Speaker 12: up electricity. So every video and book, in anything you
Speaker 12: watch or consume on a daily electricity, electricity, electricity, electricity, electricity, electricity.
Speaker 12: But nobody knows. People think that electricity is something. It
Speaker 12: is a singular entity. It's electricity. Plug it in the
Speaker 12: wall is electricity, you know, solar panel electricity. No, electricity
Speaker 12: is a hybrid entity, construct of the conjunction of dielectricity
Speaker 12: and magnetism working in tandem to create the phenomen we
Speaker 12: call electricity. If people understood that, they would easily understand
Speaker 12: how an electromagnet works, for example, yes, even electrical how's
Speaker 12: an electric magnet work? Well, you know, an apastage sto
Speaker 12: a coil. It's like, no, that's a description, that's not explanation.
Speaker 12: The way an electromagnet works is a completely dump s
Speaker 12: it's dielectric component in counter space all of the coil,
Speaker 12: and the only thing that's left is the magnetism. Electricity
Speaker 12: sheds its dielectric component, leaving only a really powerful magnetic field.
Speaker 12: So you feed a lot of current and a lot
Speaker 12: of ambridge, you know, kind of like one of those
Speaker 12: electromagnets that lift the car up out in the crushery yard,
Speaker 12: you know, pick up a crushed car, you know, haul
Speaker 12: it to be ground up. Well, and how's the electromagnet Well,
Speaker 12: I know it's got a coil in there. Yeah, but
Speaker 12: how's an electromagnet work. We're pumping it with electricity, but
Speaker 12: how's it? The dielectric component is lost in the coil
Speaker 12: and counterspace. The only thing that's left is a very
Speaker 12: powerful magnetic field. If people understood what electricity was, but
Speaker 12: they don't. They think electricity is an entity. Electricity is
Speaker 12: not an entity. Electricity is this electricity, electrostatics and magnetism
Speaker 12: working in conjunct that we call this entity, uh, electricity,
Speaker 12: But electricity is not an entity itself. It's like, well
Speaker 12: that's your position, yeah, but what are you talking about.
Speaker 12: There's not a single electrical engineer that's alive today that
Speaker 12: is even one to one hundredth as Intellivision as Charles
Speaker 12: party A Steinmitz brilliant man.
Speaker 11: Look them up.
Speaker 12: So you want to talk about a conspiracy. One thing
Speaker 12: I'm actually certain of, and even Charles Proty Steinmitz is
Speaker 12: bitching about it in a couple of his books, is
Speaker 12: how people have completely glossed over. What can we ascribe
Speaker 12: this to human stupidity or just lack of knowledge of
Speaker 12: what feels? No, electrical engineers are not taught any They weren't.
Speaker 12: They were being taught about electricity back in even Steinmitz's
Speaker 12: day is exactly one hundred years ago. If there's one
Speaker 12: conspiracy that I actually can believe in and really do
Speaker 12: believe in, because some conspiracies do exist, I mean, if
Speaker 12: we eliminate out in ninety nine percent of the BS
Speaker 12: people believe in that it's conspiracy BS, we all left
Speaker 12: with a couple of nuggets at the bottom of the bowl,
Speaker 12: which are real conspiracies to hide the truth of the nature.
Speaker 12: Because if we understood what electricity want, we understood electrostatics.
Speaker 12: Here's something else before it end this damn video, the
Speaker 12: phenomena of anti gravity. If we want to use the vernacular,
Speaker 12: which is of course connotative of something else. We're going
Speaker 12: to talk about anti gravity. We want to talk about propulsions.
Speaker 12: We want to talk about all the stuff that human
Speaker 12: beings are actually trying to manifest, whether you think the
Speaker 12: government has it or not. They cannot do that without
Speaker 12: understanding electrostatics and dielectricity. The one and only thing that
Speaker 12: people should be researching and trying to understand is electrostatics
Speaker 12: and dielectricity. This is the basis for anti gravity for countless,
Speaker 12: countless adventures that people are working on, but they can't.
Speaker 12: Their brains are locked into this electricity nonsense. I'm not
Speaker 12: calling electricity nonsense. It's a misapprehension of what electricity is.
Speaker 12: And if you think you are even one one with that,
Speaker 12: I'm not insulting you. I'm talking about anybody. If you
Speaker 12: think you're one one thousands is intelligent, that's Charles Protiu Steinmitz, Well,
Speaker 12: you're delusional. He himself was talking about this one hundred
Speaker 12: years ago and it's really not been talked about since.
Speaker 12: Well Tesla, JJ Thompson and some others. But he can
Speaker 12: ask electrical engineers, people with PhDs electrical I've heard of dielectricity.
Speaker 12: It's passed over my head like when I was getting
Speaker 12: you know, they've heard it a couple of times, and
Speaker 12: it was never explained to them, and no one ever
Speaker 12: told them the importance of it. Ask electrical engineer about
Speaker 12: that fact, dielectricity. I think I heard about that in
Speaker 12: first year electrical theory, but I've not heard it since.
Speaker 12: That's what they'll tell you. So this is one thing
Speaker 12: that I could actually call a true conspiracy, because whether
Speaker 12: you think it's a conspiracy or not, I don't really care.
Speaker 12: But it's really everything that I keep bringing in from
Speaker 12: the old texts of Faradays Dammets heavy Side, the geniuses,
Speaker 12: the gods of electrical theory lead me to really an
Speaker 12: inevitable conclusion that this is one thing that has been
Speaker 12: covered up because the basis of all really really effing
Speaker 12: cool phenomena of inventions like anti gravity, ACCOUNTSS other things,
Speaker 12: they are based in solely the understanding of dielectrics and electrostatics,
Speaker 12: which nobody, including all you people up there, were never talked,
Speaker 12: never told about. You're just electricity. Well you can't get
Speaker 12: there with electricity, you get there with electrostatics and electricity.
Speaker 12: You can't get there with electricity. But that's the matter
Speaker 12: for another video. Anyway, Thank you so much watching these
Speaker 12: videos as you do. You can click.
Speaker 1: That isn't so bad, right, I'm talking about that's the
Speaker 1: understanding of that. Those aspects will help you understand stuff
Speaker 1: like Thomas Thompson Brown was messing around with. So let's
Speaker 1: go look at this real quick. So that's the Pharaoh cell.
Speaker 1: You see that black dot. That's kind of the the
Speaker 1: royal field right there, right the lines of force Pharaoh cells.
Speaker 1: There's your magnet in the center. Okay, now let's look
Speaker 1: at oil field. See the doughnut he was referring to.
Speaker 1: It's like a compressed donut. That's the hyperboloid in the center,
Speaker 1: like your magnetic field of the heart. So yeah, I
Speaker 1: wonder why they want us to stand six feet apart
Speaker 1: from each other. I wonder if there's a constructive amplification
Speaker 1: of your the field of your body, your your magnetic
Speaker 1: field when you are in close proximity to others. I
Speaker 1: wonder if you pass information from one person to the
Speaker 1: other when you're in close proximity without even knowing it. Hmmm,
Speaker 1: is that the is that the one hundredth monkey uh phenomenon? Mm.
Speaker 1: And then it's uh, does I see what we was
Speaker 1: talking about? That's Charles pretty astegnmnsent. As you can see
Speaker 1: he was. That's him next to uh aspag and he
Speaker 1: is very cooked, very uh dwarfed. Unfortunately did a lot
Speaker 1: of leaning screens. Sign out of my way. There he is.
Speaker 1: Can you I can't move it up and down? Why
Speaker 1: can I move it outside of the side. That's weird.
Speaker 1: I should be able to move aside to side. Like
Speaker 1: there we go. So looking at all these faces, can
Speaker 1: you tell which one Nicola Tesla is that guy? He
Speaker 1: had an interesting mustache? See why why are all the
Speaker 1: cool people have the cool mustache?
Speaker 12: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I don't know, all right, so we had oh yeah,
Speaker 1: this is the thing that says this is talking about
Speaker 1: Jacob Frank. I'm not sure where he's going with this though.
Speaker 1: Frank Sect first came into infamy in seventeen fifty six
Speaker 1: when they were allegedly phoned conducting a sexual ritual in
Speaker 1: which a group of men and women dance around a
Speaker 1: half naked teenage girl the embodiment of Chicaina, the female
Speaker 1: energy force that they dry hump when they're touching the
Speaker 1: whaling wall and kissed her breasts like one would kiss
Speaker 1: the torah. My research suggests that this ritual may not
Speaker 1: a been have happened, and was actually a stock accusation
Speaker 1: made against Sabotens. But in any case, not only was
Speaker 1: the accusation believed, blah blah blah blah. So he's an apologist.
Speaker 1: Oh geez, here you go. Now he's a he's a.
Speaker 1: He's dying Frank into LGBTQ and saying that he was
Speaker 1: a pioneer. This is how messed up these people are.
Speaker 1: As a queer person who remembers all too well the
Speaker 1: repressive restrictions of traditional religion. To see what the mind is.
Speaker 1: The people are fucking crazy. Do you want to see
Speaker 1: what he looks like? This guy right here? Rabbi Rabbi
Speaker 1: gay gay Michelson here, Michaelson. He likes being seduced by men.
Speaker 1: How has Jacob Frank just seduced me? He says, So,
Speaker 1: he's straight up a Francist in a rabbi. But it's dead.
Speaker 1: Don't worry about it. Everything's it's it's not a thing anymore.
Speaker 1: It's certainly not Zionism. It's Okay, don't worry. Yeah, certainly
Speaker 1: didn't make it way into Mormonism at all. Whatever one
Speaker 1: concludes about the varied hints of scattered early associations with
Speaker 1: her Meticism, Joseph Smith had well documented connections with one
Speaker 1: of the tradition's major legacies, Masonry. The Prophets Associate prophets
Speaker 1: associations with the Masonic tradition are thoroughly documented and discussed
Speaker 1: by Michael W. Homer in his issue of Dialogue. It
Speaker 1: is unlikely that Smith would have so fully involved himself
Speaker 1: in his and his church with Masonic tradition if he
Speaker 1: had not sensed therein some intrinsic capability with his own
Speaker 1: religion making vision. As Homer demonstrates, the prophets said that
Speaker 1: masonry was taken from priesthood or priest craft taken from Kappalah,
Speaker 1: and his followers continued quoting that observation for fifty years after.
Speaker 1: It is possible that Joseph's interpretation of Masonry as a
Speaker 1: legacy of ancient priesthood. Oh you mean like yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: was based in his own understanding of a history extending
Speaker 1: back hundreds of years, a history entwined with the Hermitic
Speaker 1: Mythos and with kabbala Ah alchemy, Android's acretionism. The alliance
Speaker 1: of this occult legacy with Masonry was well understood by
Speaker 1: esthetically inclined Mason's assertions of such links were bandied about
Speaker 1: by American anti Masonic publications in the late eighteen twenties.
Speaker 1: Yeah back when people saw had their headscrewed on right
Speaker 1: and were anti Masonic, Yeah, I gotcha. As noted, Joseph's
Speaker 1: own history, several times touched for medic cabalistic traditions, oivey,
Speaker 1: one could argue that he even interacted with them in
Speaker 1: a creative visionary sense. Joseph's contact contacts with the hermetic
Speaker 1: mythos were sufficient to generate vague assumptions about Masonry's earlier roots,
Speaker 1: and these assumptions could have been a historical subtext to
Speaker 1: his remarks about Masonry being a remnant of ancient priesthood
Speaker 1: pre secraft. Interestingly, modern historical example, this is a cover
Speaker 1: Preemasonry is the Serpent cult, the Southern cult. The core
Speaker 1: of what they believe doesn't matter if they don't have
Speaker 1: the names or even understand where it's coming from. They're
Speaker 1: still that same old serpent, the same old cult of
Speaker 1: sorcery and human sacrifice that they've always been And there
Speaker 1: you go. What's the name of this you? Aska says
Speaker 1: nosis dot org forward slash JK SKA sorry j SKA
Speaker 1: like j Scott BB three goed htm. Do we want
Speaker 1: to go into this or are we done? I think
Speaker 1: we're probably done right four nineteen two years of course,
Speaker 1: let's see. Don't fall for it Ball? Why is it
Speaker 1: people always fucking do that? Stupid shit? This guy? You
Speaker 1: guys are fucking you're You're having a good time over there,
Speaker 1: aren't you? Goodbye? Don't fall for it Ball? Okay? Why
Speaker 1: would you tell me that? Why are you talking about children?
Speaker 1: Why are you doing that? I just learned about this.
Speaker 1: This is in the book. We're even mad stray Raw
Speaker 1: sent me. Why I know? I don't know you people
Speaker 1: huge fans over here, buddy, Okay. If FTJ is a
Speaker 1: sigh up, the owner's getting the USS Celebrity survivors for
Speaker 1: two undred you're talking about Dave. I don't buy it,
Speaker 1: and I don't believe it. I'm not gonna just I
Speaker 1: don't believe that. Don't fall for what? And my name
Speaker 1: isn't Ball. It's like it's like calling Ghostbusters ghost. It
Speaker 1: kind of defeats the purpose, right, don't you think? It
Speaker 1: kind of gives you the inverted opposite oppression of what
Speaker 1: it stands for. So it's like saying past removable, calling
Speaker 1: somebody past, you know, it's like, no, that's not that's
Speaker 1: not the name. We were well aware that Jacob franket
Speaker 1: sabasize every couple. You guys obviously don't know this downel
Speaker 1: very well. There's been a lot of weirdness going on
Speaker 1: as of late, and it's a semit irritating. I don't
Speaker 1: like anybody talking about any method of and in no way,
Speaker 1: shape or form about you know what, you have something
Speaker 1: with me, talk about to me. Don't don't play that
Speaker 1: I'm your friend game just to be a douche. And
Speaker 1: don't talk about children. Leave them the fuck out of it.
Speaker 1: I don't care who you are. Don't even mention, don't
Speaker 1: even contemplate. Yeah, we've kind of been going for a
Speaker 1: while so and we saw that one yesterdays so I'm
Speaker 1: not really sure where we were we went upward, but
Speaker 1: I just know one on the bottom, So let's just
Speaker 1: go to the bottom, move our way up.
Speaker 29: Mmmm.
Speaker 1: See this I had to pay. I had to take
Speaker 1: a picture of this because this is something. This is
Speaker 1: something that popped up while I was looking through my feed,
Speaker 1: and this is one of those things that you know
Speaker 1: they've been planning and there they've been saying that they're
Speaker 1: going to drop this crap in there to try to
Speaker 1: trange people around. Yeah. Uh there' Israel. A couple secretly
Speaker 1: burious Holocaust survivor mom to keep social benefits. Local police
Speaker 1: say after the death of the woman's ninety years three
Speaker 1: year old mother, the two put her body in an
Speaker 1: ice cream freezer and read it so they could continue
Speaker 1: to take the benefits. This is a little interesting.
Speaker 29: I cannot believe that this is a real headline. But
Speaker 29: bear with me, all right, mistery Trump ally donates one
Speaker 29: hundred and thirty million dollars to help cover troops paychecks.
Speaker 1: I don't like that.
Speaker 29: One major fucking problem that the military is now relying
Speaker 29: on gofund me essentially into.
Speaker 12: All of these.
Speaker 1: And not a misdooner.
Speaker 29: The ethics violations that this represents dark money paying troops,
Speaker 29: and people are gonna explain that a way. Think about
Speaker 29: who that could be, Guys, could that be somebody from
Speaker 29: Sally or you know, Qatar or wherever, making a donation
Speaker 29: to pay US troops the only people that can pay you.
Speaker 1: Notice how it jumps over the fact that it could
Speaker 1: easily be enemies of the American people in a different
Speaker 1: form that already are here, who already control our government.
Speaker 1: Name the oi fucking vase. Notice that he says this
Speaker 1: as salties and my spiders didn't say irun? Did he
Speaker 1: say iran?
Speaker 29: Probably the US truths or US tax payers And that's
Speaker 29: the only part of the money that should be coming from,
Speaker 29: not whatever the fuck this is.
Speaker 3: And I can't believe it.
Speaker 16: Fox News is celebrating it like it's a good thing.
Speaker 29: The corruption now is I can't believe it. I wouldn't
Speaker 29: accept my paycheck. That's outside of the realm for me
Speaker 29: to say. But if I don't know where the money's
Speaker 29: coming from, how is this legal?
Speaker 10: Oh, lost, don't matter.
Speaker 29: I'm an idiot because you know, now, whoever made that donation,
Speaker 29: it's gonna come asking for a favor from the US
Speaker 29: military down the line. Everything is trans actual right, the
Speaker 29: US military is effectively politicized, and the President of the
Speaker 29: United States and the Secretary of Defense have done it.
Speaker 29: You put private interest inside the military. I mean it's
Speaker 29: always been there, right, but I mean, this is Blaine.
Speaker 11: This is Blaine.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so this is interesting. Ernest Temingway claims he was
Speaker 1: followed by the FBI for years. Everyone thought he was
Speaker 1: losing his mind. The FBI is gang stuck and contributed
Speaker 1: to his suicide. A few years ago, the FBI released
Speaker 1: his file. Turns out they were following him and had
Speaker 1: placed him under constant surveillance. I'm not saying he was
Speaker 1: a great guy or anything. That's that's that's adding more
Speaker 1: to it than what is being said here. And man,
Speaker 1: these people needed to go to the gym. How could
Speaker 1: you have scorning arms like that? It's not cool. This
Speaker 1: is really disturbing.
Speaker 30: Can you walk us through how this idea of an
Speaker 30: AI clone of Suzanne first came about.
Speaker 24: Actually we refer to it as a twin rather than
Speaker 24: a clone, a clone something else. When it became a reality,
Speaker 24: Suzanne said, I think this is important and I want
Speaker 24: to do this. We had a lot of conversations about it,
Speaker 24: how we're going to handle it, and basically we're handling
Speaker 24: it the way she wanted.
Speaker 3: Me to handle it.
Speaker 12: How's the rest of Suzanne's family feeling about this. Some
Speaker 12: of them are a little tentative. I don't think it.
Speaker 24: Should be a family.
Speaker 1: He basically is making a real doll of his ex
Speaker 1: a decision, I mean of his dead wife.
Speaker 24: Right, never had a committee decision in fifty five years
Speaker 24: about anything. There's really no need to start now. And
Speaker 24: this is what I want to deliver for Suzanne. I
Speaker 24: want Suzanne AI to be able to respond to anybody
Speaker 24: ask her a question, and I think it's possible.
Speaker 30: So the general public will be able to interact with
Speaker 30: the AI version of Susanne Sommers as well.
Speaker 24: Correct, everybody will be able to react with Susanne Sommers.
Speaker 1: So hold on a second, let's get to the beginning
Speaker 1: of an apposit.
Speaker 30: Can walk through how this idea that's the real one?
Speaker 1: There it is. She looks a lot younger. Huh. That's
Speaker 1: that's a damn real doll with a moving eyeballs. So
Speaker 1: what do you mean they'll be able to interact, So
Speaker 1: she'll be in like a chatbot too, She'll be She'll
Speaker 1: be in the Internet totally, not a trojan horse or
Speaker 1: something wicked, not at all. Sorry, Suzanne, we already know
Speaker 1: about that old video. This I mean maybe maybe at
Speaker 1: least they're warning us. I mean at least uh there, Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's that thing. You should always be prepared anyway.
Speaker 12: But so no.
Speaker 31: Benefits are being taken away as a result of the
Speaker 31: government shut down. You might say that doesn't matter to me.
Speaker 31: I am not on an ebt. Great, those people need
Speaker 31: to get jobs. That's not the argument or the discussion here.
Speaker 17: People without food.
Speaker 31: For themselves and their children get desperate, and as you
Speaker 31: can see from the following videos, they're taking to take
Speaker 31: a talk and Instagram to let you know.
Speaker 1: So what I happen the most negroid way possible. It's
Speaker 1: a little browd ridiculous, entitled, obnoxious, outrageous way possible.
Speaker 31: I have to save it to you is stay vigilant,
Speaker 31: key situational awareness and put your thoughts in the comments below.
Speaker 31: Just a thought, have a great day.
Speaker 13: If you work at a grocery store, and do you
Speaker 13: know that the food stamps is not working in November
Speaker 13: and you see people stealing and you snitch, you.
Speaker 10: Deserve to die.
Speaker 12: Trump said, all the groceries is free.
Speaker 16: Now that's what I heard.
Speaker 20: Well, you take from us, we take from you.
Speaker 1: Don't you think that these people are totally serving a
Speaker 1: purpose in life and existence, and you know there would
Speaker 1: it would be a darn shame if they were missing
Speaker 1: from this universe. That's not the impression I get. I'm
Speaker 1: just asking.
Speaker 20: You doing something by not giving a pool.
Speaker 1: F's right, right? Like this this genius here, that's what
Speaker 1: this person looks like. They're really they really are beacon
Speaker 1: to their community and they improve the lives of people
Speaker 1: around them.
Speaker 20: Like bitches, don't hat pursones and begs. Bitch, we're right
Speaker 20: eat and we're gonna eat good.
Speaker 1: Looks like you already do. Yeah, you're right right, so right,
Speaker 1: just one more more more proof that everyone else is
Speaker 1: supposed to pay for their existence. And this is the
Speaker 1: type of existence that they lead. A race is done,
Speaker 1: because why it's not the corporations that get slapped with
Speaker 1: the higher food prices. When you start stealing, you retard
Speaker 1: you how hard the show is right, you're stealing from
Speaker 1: people every day. You're stealing from the people who pay
Speaker 1: their tithings to their demon government.
Speaker 17: And day.
Speaker 23: If you are that Walmart employee who snitched on that
Speaker 23: single mother, there go a five.
Speaker 12: For cynically trying.
Speaker 1: How about no, there's other ways of doing it. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure this person was black with their five children.
Speaker 1: Why people aren't giving uh, aren't doing the whole multiple
Speaker 1: litters of children thing anymore.
Speaker 12: To feed her kids? Mind your fucking business.
Speaker 1: Everybody's gonna listen to that woman, right, Johnald Trump caused
Speaker 1: it riot at Walmart? Dude, you snap benefits going away right?
Speaker 1: The free riot? This this isn't really about that. It's
Speaker 1: about causing antagonism so that people start fighting amongst each other,
Speaker 1: which is exactly what this will cause because little brow
Speaker 1: stupid people are going to do that stupid thing.
Speaker 17: Right.
Speaker 1: There are going to be those retards. These people can't
Speaker 1: sit up straight when they do a video.
Speaker 13: He came into Walmart, bomb rushing, stealing, like filling up.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you he sucks penises.
Speaker 13: Buggy's running out the store like just putting all the
Speaker 13: groceries in their car because he wanted to cut off
Speaker 13: in they car.
Speaker 1: Can you not please, like just try to learn the language?
Speaker 1: Can you at least do that? Can you articulate like
Speaker 1: you aren't half retarded? Is it possible?
Speaker 13: Is it?
Speaker 1: It's like a sign of laziness, like why even speak?
Speaker 1: Why even put that energy in? If you're not gonna
Speaker 1: use the right words.
Speaker 13: Motherfucking food stamps.
Speaker 20: Be Walmart with my steal on and my mother help me, and.
Speaker 1: You're gonna look pretty fucking silly. How about a swift
Speaker 1: kick in the fucking throat betting I'm too fold, you
Speaker 1: don't need to eat. You could probably last a couple
Speaker 1: of months, mag.
Speaker 12: Because I'm turf.
Speaker 20: You think you're gonna stop with mother le grossriends.
Speaker 32: I would hate for you to not be able to
Speaker 32: make it back to your family, and for you to
Speaker 32: not be able to make it back home because you're
Speaker 32: trying to save these billionaire companies.
Speaker 1: That's not how that works. The bass. You're mad because
Speaker 1: you're not stealing from taxpayers anymore for your lazy, fucking, disgusting,
Speaker 1: pathetic life, your lap of luxury. That's why you don't
Speaker 1: sit up straight, because you don't have a you don't
Speaker 1: have a purpose. Its fucking wave a freaking effect here.
Speaker 1: It's not the billionaire companies, you goddamn stupid retard that
Speaker 1: you're harming. And then and then you're talking about why
Speaker 1: don't you go to the billionaire house then and you'll
Speaker 1: let them about how you should take their stuff. That
Speaker 1: and their stores for free, and then you'll realize that
Speaker 1: they're unless they're letting their dogs out on you, and
Speaker 1: their security is putting bullets in your face, because that's
Speaker 1: what happens when you try to attack the source of
Speaker 1: the problem. Well whatever, this isn't that, that's not even
Speaker 1: the scenario here. But it you're kind of retarded, You're
Speaker 1: you're blaming. It's it's we're all slaves to this fucking system,
Speaker 1: and the slaves are now fighting amongst each other, and
Speaker 1: these are the lowest form of them. It's this is
Speaker 1: just a sickening thing.
Speaker 30: So if y'all think the people are the only ones
Speaker 30: that's going to be.
Speaker 1: Losing a shut up with your fucking fast talking ignorance.
Speaker 12: This little text.
Speaker 30: Message notification y'all sent about us and not getting our
Speaker 30: November e d T.
Speaker 1: You guys are very mistaken.
Speaker 30: So this message is also for Walmart, Kroger, Albertson Companies, Public's, Albi, Cosco,
Speaker 30: and Clothes and Target.
Speaker 1: Y'all bet the state of flood out of my way
Speaker 1: and eastwards.
Speaker 16: I'm walking out with.
Speaker 1: The rocking back and forth. Yeah, you're you're you're really
Speaker 1: intelligent individual. Look at all the look at all the
Speaker 1: intellects exuding from her. This must be why she's sweating
Speaker 1: cars for trumpt You won't. It's Trump that you're talking to, right,
Speaker 1: it's not the American people that you've been stealing from
Speaker 1: for decades. That's nice eyebrows or eyelashes. I mean, you
Speaker 1: don't have any eyebrows.
Speaker 17: Motherbucks happy before my kids broken.
Speaker 1: Dumb bitch work.
Speaker 3: It's like Jack, I'm gonna be stealing like.
Speaker 1: It looks like you feed them absolute trash and garbage too,
Speaker 1: because they're such a genius.
Speaker 12: At least they're warning us.
Speaker 17: So I'm.
Speaker 1: So there's that the angry Negroes are going to be
Speaker 1: more angry and more negro Just the heads up. See
Speaker 1: how many things were in between those two and it
Speaker 1: wasn't there a second ago. It's weird. I forgot what
Speaker 1: this one was about. There's a point here, but it's
Speaker 1: not very good. I forgot. Oh, this is when they're Oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, there's no more Anglo Saxons. Everybody. They're
Speaker 1: erasing us from history. And this is why they've already
Speaker 1: erased the Gothic Arians from history. That's why we talk
Speaker 1: about the British Eda and the makers of Civilization, race
Speaker 1: and history in this on this channel, those two books
Speaker 1: everybody should read.
Speaker 5: Edwards University has updated its curriculum Home Anglo Saxon and
Speaker 5: Norse and Celtic History and Planets to now teach that Angle.
Speaker 1: Of Saxons is not a white person telling you this did.
Speaker 31: Not exist as a distinct ethnic group.
Speaker 1: They're telling you they're changing it. Hold on, yeah, nothing good.
Speaker 3: Stating that the change is in a bitch.
Speaker 1: Combat racism and nationalism, right, combat racism by making by
Speaker 1: attacking the one the only race that's ever created anything, right, gotcha?
Speaker 1: And all the all the atrocities that have been conducted
Speaker 1: in our name have been from people who look awfully white,
Speaker 1: but they weren't. And they would call themselves Germans or
Speaker 1: the Dutch East India Company, but they weren't exactly Dutch. Okay,
Speaker 1: sure thing, it's it must be us. We're the ones.
Speaker 33: Teaching seeks to dismantle the basis of myths of nationalism.
Speaker 1: Myths of nationalism. See, I told you destroy the family,
Speaker 1: tribe and nation. These are the things that we need
Speaker 1: to make strong. Family is the core tribe, and then
Speaker 1: nation nationalism identity of who you are pride in that.
Speaker 1: That's what they want to destroy. They want to just
Speaker 1: story history. They want to change history. They live in
Speaker 1: an artificial world and the real world is very inconvenient
Speaker 1: for them, and if you sit around and let them
Speaker 1: do this, they will. They are they have been. That's
Speaker 1: why we have people following their fucking Abrahamic religions and
Speaker 1: have absolutely no idea that their people introduce all the
Speaker 1: good qualities of those religions to them to make those
Speaker 1: false religions legitimized. Because I had they don't have a
Speaker 1: concept of morality. They stole it from us and then
Speaker 1: sold it.
Speaker 33: That there Adam was a British, English, Scottish, Welsh or
Speaker 33: Irish people with a coherent and the ancient ethnic identity.
Speaker 33: By sharing students just how constructed and contingent these identities are,
Speaker 33: I'm always happy.
Speaker 1: No, that's a lie, though.
Speaker 12: Being the university will also change that.
Speaker 3: There has never been any actual Scottish, well for.
Speaker 5: Hours identities with ancient roots as they were also constructed.
Speaker 12: Also, academics of real Saxon is problematic.
Speaker 1: I can't hear two things at once and I want
Speaker 1: to rip my headphones off, So you get it.
Speaker 25: What is this about if raising your own flag of
Speaker 25: the country you live in is an act of rebellion
Speaker 25: and racism, then maybe your own country is under foreign occupation.
Speaker 25: Civilians throughout all of Europe are being attacked because they're
Speaker 25: flying their country's flag. Do you guys have no idea
Speaker 25: what's happening in Europe right now? Because American news is
Speaker 25: not covering any of this. Europe is being under attack
Speaker 25: right now. Civilians who are living in the UK and
Speaker 25: other countries in Europe are protesting by hanging their country's
Speaker 25: nationality and their flag throughout their whole country. This is
Speaker 25: actually being shown as and as an act of rebellion
Speaker 25: by hanging their own country's flag.
Speaker 12: That is an act of rebellion.
Speaker 25: People are getting fined, flags are being taken down and
Speaker 25: left just controlled media is only the civilians of Europe
Speaker 25: to premisists and racists all because they want to hang
Speaker 25: their country's flag and be proud of their heritage and nationality.
Speaker 25: So it's one is hanging in your country's flag a
Speaker 25: sign of racism in your own country because it's the UK.
Speaker 25: What other flags would you expect in the UK? The
Speaker 25: Nigerian flag, the Brazilian flag, the Iranian flag.
Speaker 1: Only the rem fan flag is one they're hoping that
Speaker 1: you've raise, and we are if you if you call
Speaker 1: Synegagua brothel, a dent, a vice, the devil's refuge, Satan's fortress,
Speaker 1: a place to deprave, the soul, an abyss of every
Speaker 1: conceivable disaster, or whatever you will, you are still saying
Speaker 1: less than it deserves. Bam. They're behind all the prosecuted
Speaker 1: persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere,
Speaker 1: hitting and undermining the Christian faith. Or how about just
Speaker 1: mankind in general as well. In addition, because it's a
Speaker 1: cult and they want supremacy and you have little faggots
Speaker 1: out here who like to try to get a rise.
Speaker 1: They're probably paid. I don't think they're real people. I
Speaker 1: mean they are people, but they're not like real people.
Speaker 1: They don't have a life. It's pretty cute. And I'll
Speaker 1: tell you this too. If there's ever a perceived true threat,
Speaker 1: you don't want to continue to do what you're doing.
Speaker 1: You don't want to do that. It is observed to
Speaker 1: profess christ with the lips and at the same time
Speaker 1: to practice Judaism. For Christianity did not base its faith
Speaker 1: on Judaism, but Judaism on Christianity, saying that Nius of
Speaker 1: Antioch's top a lot of breathing. Is there more? I
Speaker 1: love it? All? Right? Well, there you go. This this
Speaker 1: is I don't remember what this is about.
Speaker 11: But I have also be to my own people.
Speaker 34: And when I look on my people, I see them
Speaker 34: at work and work and in toil and labor, and
Speaker 34: at the end of the week they have only for
Speaker 34: their wages and midery when I go out.
Speaker 1: It doesn't it didn't. Didn't anybody ever tell the uncle
Speaker 1: itolf that we're not given enough and they're gonna come
Speaker 1: get us, especially if we interfere with them stealing.
Speaker 34: By I have seen these men standing in their cues.
Speaker 34: I'm looking into their finished faces. Then I believe I
Speaker 34: would be no a prision but the many devil. If
Speaker 34: I don't no pity for then, if I didn't added
Speaker 34: our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by
Speaker 34: whom today many more people are london and exploited.
Speaker 1: There you go, yepes n a bullshit okay, And I
Speaker 1: think that means we are gig gig, get good good
Speaker 1: yeahs sweating from all the work. She's not doing exactly.
Speaker 1: But as all the gay ship, well, it's because it's
Speaker 1: in the contest. It's happy, all right. So I'm going
Speaker 1: to answer your question. It says you've mentioned before I
Speaker 1: haven't been here in a while and just said I
Speaker 1: hope you're doing good. Okay, all right, Well forgive if
Speaker 1: that's the true. If that's the case, it's just I
Speaker 1: don't do that in public. Of all other people who don't.
Speaker 1: You can't understand the public, all right. Even reminding people
Speaker 1: of something like that is they'll try to work an
Speaker 1: angle to try to do some harm to you. And
Speaker 1: I'm not exactly talking about things that people like to hear.
Speaker 1: It's too fucking bad for them. And Chicago Waften with
Speaker 1: your gay name, I'm not really sure what you're talking about.
Speaker 1: So it's not ball either. It's ball Busters. If you're
Speaker 1: not smart enough to understand that, you really aren't smart
Speaker 1: enough to watch the show. And okay, So for the
Speaker 1: rest of you, patreons here, Gifson goes there. My website,
Speaker 1: there is for the House Auce my book, and you
Speaker 1: should totally go to your band by Amazon dot com.
Speaker 1: I don't give a fuck what anybody has to say
Speaker 1: about that. EB Dan for ten percent off, have an
Speaker 1: awesome night, let's say, if there's anybody else over here
Speaker 1: on the j and then again on this side of things,
Speaker 1: I don't really care what you have to say about
Speaker 1: that either. I don't get my opinions from others. Good night,