WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomi podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:29.039
<v Speaker 2>Today we are doing something a little different. We're not

8
00:00:29.120 --> 00:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>just analyzing a document. We're trying to tune in to

9
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:38.039
<v Speaker 2>the core rhythm of the cosmos, the actual beat of

10
00:00:38.119 --> 00:00:39.439
<v Speaker 2>space and time itself.

11
00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:41.439
<v Speaker 3>It's a pretty profound idea to start with.

12
00:00:41.560 --> 00:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>It is, imagine the entire universe, I mean everything, all

13
00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the galaxies, the stars, the empty voids, constantly you know, oscillating.

14
00:00:49.240 --> 00:00:51.880
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the gravitational wave background.

15
00:00:51.479 --> 00:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>The concept that for decades was pure theory. It sounds

16
00:00:55.640 --> 00:00:57.479
<v Speaker 3>like something straight out of science fiction, but it's not.

17
00:00:57.719 --> 00:01:02.079
<v Speaker 2>We now know it is absolute, polutely, demonstrably real. It

18
00:01:02.159 --> 00:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>is the ultimate cosmic hum.

19
00:01:03.880 --> 00:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>That's a good way to put it. If you could

20
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:08.959
<v Speaker 3>somehow turn up the volume on the universe, the gravitational

21
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>wave background, or the GWB would be this fundamental low

22
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>frequency roar you'd hear underneath everything else.

23
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:17.439
<v Speaker 2>And the one description that really stuck with me from

24
00:01:17.439 --> 00:01:20.439
<v Speaker 2>our source material today, a fantastic study from the University

25
00:01:20.439 --> 00:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>of Colorado Boulder published in the Astrophysical Journal, is that

26
00:01:23.719 --> 00:01:26.439
<v Speaker 2>these are ripples in space and time right, and that

27
00:01:26.480 --> 00:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>these ripples are moving constantly through the cosmos. And this

28
00:01:30.239 --> 00:01:32.879
<v Speaker 2>is the great part. Jiggles is almost like jello.

29
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:36.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a fantastic analogy for trying to visualize it, isn't

30
00:01:36.280 --> 00:01:38.159
<v Speaker 3>it It is? Though, you know, we should be clear

31
00:01:38.159 --> 00:01:42.599
<v Speaker 3>that the jiggle is it's infinitesimly subtle, you'd never ever

32
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:46.920
<v Speaker 3>feel it. But it's detection that is anything but subtle.

33
00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Monumental achievement, oh absolutely. It represents a huge triumph for

34
00:01:51.120 --> 00:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>physics and it's opened up this profound new way of

35
00:01:54.879 --> 00:01:59.159
<v Speaker 3>investigating how the largest structures in the universe actually evolve

36
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and interact with each other.

37
00:02:00.599 --> 00:02:02.959
<v Speaker 2>And that's really our mission for this deep dive. We

38
00:02:03.000 --> 00:02:06.879
<v Speaker 2>want to unpack a massive cosmic mystery that really it

39
00:02:06.920 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 2>arose the very instant this background was first detected.

40
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:13.800
<v Speaker 3>The celebration and the confusion arrived at almost the exact

41
00:02:13.840 --> 00:02:14.639
<v Speaker 3>same moment.

42
00:02:14.520 --> 00:02:17.639
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and the CU Boulder research we're looking at offers

43
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:20.599
<v Speaker 2>what might be the most compelling solution to this puzzle yet,

44
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:24.879
<v Speaker 2>a puzzle that has stumped astrophysicists since that groundbreaking GWB

45
00:02:25.039 --> 00:02:27.439
<v Speaker 2>detection was announced back in twenty twenty three.

46
00:02:27.439 --> 00:02:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, And I think to really appreciate the solution, we

47
00:02:30.280 --> 00:02:33.639
<v Speaker 3>first have to understand the main players in this enormous

48
00:02:33.719 --> 00:02:34.439
<v Speaker 3>cosmic drama.

49
00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's set the stage.

50
00:02:35.479 --> 00:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the GWB itself is fundamentally created by this constant,

51
00:02:40.439 --> 00:02:41.560
<v Speaker 3>relentless merging of.

52
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Galaxies, a process that's been going on for billions of.

53
00:02:45.800 --> 00:02:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Years, billions of years. It's central to how complex galaxies

54
00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>like our own Milky Way actually form and grow and

55
00:02:53.719 --> 00:02:55.639
<v Speaker 3>mature over cosmic time.

56
00:02:55.759 --> 00:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And at the heart of those mergers you have the

57
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.759
<v Speaker 2>real behemoths, the anchors of the whole thing.

58
00:03:00.039 --> 00:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Exactly at the core of every significant galaxy you'll find

59
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:08.599
<v Speaker 3>a super massive black hole in SMBH. So when two

60
00:03:08.639 --> 00:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>galaxies are drawn together by gravity, their two central SMBHs

61
00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:18.319
<v Speaker 3>are also drawn into this spiraling, inevitable and ultimately violent dance.

62
00:03:18.439 --> 00:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's the end of that dance, the collision that

63
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>sends out the signal we're talking about.

64
00:03:22.280 --> 00:03:25.039
<v Speaker 3>That's the moment. The final collision of these supermassive black

65
00:03:25.039 --> 00:03:29.240
<v Speaker 3>holes sends these incredibly powerful ripples and spacetime gravitational waves

66
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:30.479
<v Speaker 3>flooding out of the cosmos.

67
00:03:30.479 --> 00:03:32.879
<v Speaker 2>So, if you just zoom out across all of cosmic time,

68
00:03:32.879 --> 00:03:36.159
<v Speaker 2>you've got billions of years of these galaxies merging, billions

69
00:03:36.159 --> 00:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>of these black hole collisions, right, and all of them

70
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>are contributing their own individual ripples to this subtle, omnipresent background. Hum.

71
00:03:44.120 --> 00:03:48.759
<v Speaker 3>That's it, exactly. That cumulative overlapping signature is the gravitational

72
00:03:48.840 --> 00:03:52.840
<v Speaker 3>wave background. It's like imagine turning on a trillion distant

73
00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:55.439
<v Speaker 3>radios all at once and just listening to the collective

74
00:03:55.479 --> 00:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>static they generate.

75
00:03:56.520 --> 00:03:58.360
<v Speaker 2>And this brings us right to the heart of the puzzle.

76
00:03:58.759 --> 00:04:02.039
<v Speaker 2>The one data point that made this whole field of research.

77
00:04:01.800 --> 00:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Just turn on its head, the big reveal.

78
00:04:03.919 --> 00:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

79
00:04:04.639 --> 00:04:08.319
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty three, several big international collaborations, the most

80
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:11.919
<v Speaker 2>prominent being nanograph that's the North American Nanohurtz Observatory for

81
00:04:11.960 --> 00:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>gravitational waves, they announced they had done it for the

82
00:04:15.039 --> 00:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>first time. They had definitively detected the GWB, an.

83
00:04:18.759 --> 00:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Earth shattering moment for gravitational wave astronomy, I mean, a

84
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:24.319
<v Speaker 3>Nobel prizeworthy discovery, without a doubt.

85
00:04:24.360 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>But then they looked closer at the signal itself, and that's.

86
00:04:26.959 --> 00:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Where the confusion started. They'd found the song, but it

87
00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:32.240
<v Speaker 3>was being played far, far too loud.

88
00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Exactly when they measured the waves, they were significantly, I

89
00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:38.879
<v Speaker 2>mean shockingly larger than anyone had predicted.

90
00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:42.759
<v Speaker 3>All of the best theoretical models, the most sophisticated simulations

91
00:04:42.759 --> 00:04:45.759
<v Speaker 3>we had, they all pointed to a much quieter background.

92
00:04:45.959 --> 00:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So you have this clear, massive discrepancy between what the

93
00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:53.759
<v Speaker 2>physics models calculated should be there and what our observations

94
00:04:53.759 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>were actually showing us.

95
00:04:55.040 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, And as Julie Kammerford, the lead author of the

96
00:04:57.319 --> 00:04:59.639
<v Speaker 3>study were focusing on, said, when she saw the data,

97
00:05:00.279 --> 00:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>it was a surprise and a fun new puzzle to

98
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>figure out.

99
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>A fun puzzle, I guess if you're a brilliant astrophysicist.

100
00:05:07.079 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 2>For everyone else, it was just a massive mystery.

101
00:05:09.800 --> 00:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly what her team set out to solve.

102
00:05:12.240 --> 00:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's try to unpack this, this cosmic symphony.

103
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>We need to really establish the fundamental concept of the

104
00:05:19.399 --> 00:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>GWB because you know, the name is familiar, but the

105
00:05:22.959 --> 00:05:23.959
<v Speaker 2>physics behind it.

106
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Is just vast, it really is.

107
00:05:26.360 --> 00:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with that analogy you like from the source material,

108
00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the swimming pool, just to make it a bit more concrete.

109
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>The swimming pool analogy is probably the best way to

110
00:05:34.199 --> 00:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>visualize what's happening. So picture a massive, cosmic sized swimming pool.

111
00:05:39.959 --> 00:05:42.160
<v Speaker 3>This pool represents the entirety of space time.

112
00:05:42.240 --> 00:05:42.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, got it.

113
00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, imagine there are lots and lots of people in

114
00:05:46.120 --> 00:05:51.360
<v Speaker 3>this pool. These people are the galaxies, and more specifically,

115
00:05:51.600 --> 00:05:56.639
<v Speaker 3>they're merging black holes, and they are all constantly moving around, kicking, splashing, and.

116
00:05:56.680 --> 00:05:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Every one of those splashes, every kick, that's an individual

117
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:03.279
<v Speaker 2>gravitational wave being sent out by a black hole merger

118
00:06:03.519 --> 00:06:04.639
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in the universe.

119
00:06:04.680 --> 00:06:07.360
<v Speaker 3>That's it, exactly. And the gravitational wave background is just

120
00:06:07.399 --> 00:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the accumulation of all of it, the overlap, the interference

121
00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:15.040
<v Speaker 3>pattern of every single one of those individual waves happening

122
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:18.399
<v Speaker 3>all across the universe over billions and billions of years.

123
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So you don't feel one distinct splash, You just feel

124
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the constant, chaotic churn of the water.

125
00:06:24.120 --> 00:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>You end up with a constant wash of overlapping ripples

126
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>across the entire surface of the pool. That's the background.

127
00:06:30.600 --> 00:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, I think a really critical piece of context here

128
00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>is the scale. Because when we talk about gravitational waves,

129
00:06:36.120 --> 00:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people probably think of the first ones

130
00:06:38.519 --> 00:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that were detected by Lego.

131
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's a very important distinction to make.

132
00:06:42.199 --> 00:06:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Those came from much smaller stellar mass black holes colliding,

133
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and those waves were well, they had very high frequencies,

134
00:06:49.639 --> 00:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>relatively speaking, they were like a quick, sharp chup.

135
00:06:52.399 --> 00:06:55.639
<v Speaker 3>That's a crucial difference. The Lego waves are in what

136
00:06:55.639 --> 00:06:58.879
<v Speaker 3>we call the acoustical range hundreds of hertz. They last

137
00:06:58.920 --> 00:07:01.519
<v Speaker 3>for a fraction of a second. You can literally convert

138
00:07:01.560 --> 00:07:03.439
<v Speaker 3>them into a sound, that famous chirp.

139
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>But the GWB we're talking about now, the one detected

140
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>by nanograph, that's in the nanohertz range nanohurts.

141
00:07:08.959 --> 00:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's in almost incomprehensibly low frequency.

142
00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:13.519
<v Speaker 2>What does that actually mean nanohertz?

143
00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>It means one single cycle of one of these waves

144
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>takes billions of seconds to complete.

145
00:07:18.839 --> 00:07:22.959
<v Speaker 2>Billions of seconds, so years, many many years for one

146
00:07:22.959 --> 00:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>wave to.

147
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Pass by, decades even. And the reason the frequency is

148
00:07:26.000 --> 00:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>so incredibly low is because the source is just so vast.

149
00:07:29.240 --> 00:07:33.399
<v Speaker 3>The nanohertz signal corresponds to the waves generated by those

150
00:07:33.399 --> 00:07:35.720
<v Speaker 3>super massive black hole binaries we were talking about.

151
00:07:35.759 --> 00:07:37.439
<v Speaker 2>These aren't two sun sized objects.

152
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:41.040
<v Speaker 3>These are bohemoth, gargantuan systems. You have two black holes

153
00:07:41.439 --> 00:07:44.079
<v Speaker 3>each millions or billions of times the mass of our

154
00:07:44.120 --> 00:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Sun orbiting each other. Their orbits are huge, sometimes taking

155
00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:50.680
<v Speaker 3>several years or even decades to complete. So the waves

156
00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>they emit are themselves incredibly long, low frequency repels that

157
00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:56.879
<v Speaker 3>stretch across light years of space.

158
00:07:57.079 --> 00:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's the slow, steady, in enormous oscillation that makes

159
00:08:01.879 --> 00:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>up the GWB.

160
00:08:03.040 --> 00:08:05.439
<v Speaker 3>That's the symphony. It's not a quick chirp. It's the

161
00:08:05.680 --> 00:08:07.079
<v Speaker 3>deep base note of the universe.

162
00:08:07.279 --> 00:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And yet, I mean, even though the sources are so massive,

163
00:08:10.079 --> 00:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the actual effect on us is still basically nil. Right,

164
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>We're being jiggled like jello, but we don't feel a thing.

165
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Correct. The ways have stretched out and weakened over cosmic distances.

166
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:22.959
<v Speaker 3>They're so incredibly subtle that we require instruments of just

167
00:08:23.160 --> 00:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>unimaginable sensitivity to even detect them. And this really brings

168
00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>us back to the source of those ripples, the mechanics

169
00:08:29.040 --> 00:08:30.199
<v Speaker 3>of how galaxies evolve.

170
00:08:30.399 --> 00:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>So walk us through that mechanic. How do two huge

171
00:08:33.960 --> 00:08:37.559
<v Speaker 2>galaxies miles apart end up with their central black holes

172
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:39.279
<v Speaker 2>in that final fatal dance.

173
00:08:39.559 --> 00:08:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, the universe is constantly building bigger things from smaller things.

174
00:08:43.559 --> 00:08:47.399
<v Speaker 3>It's a hierarchical process. Gravity is always at work pulling

175
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:49.799
<v Speaker 3>smaller galaxies into the orbits of larger ones.

176
00:08:50.120 --> 00:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So you have countless galaxies constantly colliding and intertwining all

177
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:54.399
<v Speaker 2>over the cosmos.

178
00:08:54.519 --> 00:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and as two large galaxies start to merge, they're

179
00:08:58.320 --> 00:09:01.679
<v Speaker 3>two super massive black hole holes which were at their

180
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.639
<v Speaker 3>respective centers begin to lose orbital energy.

181
00:09:04.919 --> 00:09:06.159
<v Speaker 2>How do they lose energy?

182
00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Primarily through a process called dynamical friction. As they move

183
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>through the now combined galaxy, their immense gravity pulls on

184
00:09:13.600 --> 00:09:16.519
<v Speaker 3>all the stars and gas clouds around them, creating a

185
00:09:16.600 --> 00:09:18.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of gravitational wake.

186
00:09:18.279 --> 00:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Ah, So that wake pulls back on them, slowing them

187
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:21.639
<v Speaker 2>down exactly.

188
00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:24.519
<v Speaker 3>It's like cosmic drag. This friction robs them of their

189
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:27.879
<v Speaker 3>orbital energy, causing them to spiral inward, closer and closer

190
00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:29.559
<v Speaker 3>than the new center of the merged galaxy.

191
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:31.879
<v Speaker 2>And that's when they enter that final spiraling dance.

192
00:09:32.159 --> 00:09:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, they form a binary system orbiting each other getting

193
00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>faster and closer and closer till they eventually they coalesce

194
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>into a single even the larger black hole.

195
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And that final moment, that coalescence, that's the big splash, That's.

196
00:09:45.799 --> 00:09:48.840
<v Speaker 3>The moment that releases a tremendous burst of energy in

197
00:09:48.919 --> 00:09:52.679
<v Speaker 3>the form of these nanohertz gravitational ways, sending those ripples

198
00:09:52.679 --> 00:09:53.799
<v Speaker 3>out through the cosmos.

199
00:09:53.879 --> 00:09:56.559
<v Speaker 2>So, in terms of the broader context, why does charting

200
00:09:56.600 --> 00:09:59.639
<v Speaker 2>this background, why does it matter so much to astrophysicists?

201
00:09:59.679 --> 00:10:00.879
<v Speaker 2>What's the big prize here?

202
00:10:01.519 --> 00:10:04.679
<v Speaker 3>The big prize is that the GWB is effectively a

203
00:10:04.720 --> 00:10:07.159
<v Speaker 3>fossil record of galaxy.

204
00:10:06.679 --> 00:10:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Formation, a fossil record.

205
00:10:08.519 --> 00:10:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, by studying the specific details, the frequency, of the amplitude,

206
00:10:12.879 --> 00:10:16.159
<v Speaker 3>the whole signature of these waves, we can learn so much.

207
00:10:16.759 --> 00:10:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It reveals new insights into the evolution of the universe itself.

208
00:10:20.440 --> 00:10:24.600
<v Speaker 3>How so well, if we can correctly model the GWB,

209
00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>if we can understand why it has the strength it does,

210
00:10:27.960 --> 00:10:30.919
<v Speaker 3>we can basically reconstruct how galaxies have been merging over

211
00:10:30.919 --> 00:10:35.159
<v Speaker 3>the last say, ten billion years. We can understand how smaller, simpler,

212
00:10:35.159 --> 00:10:39.080
<v Speaker 3>what we call primordial galaxies coalesced over time to create

213
00:10:39.080 --> 00:10:41.559
<v Speaker 3>the large complex structures like the Milky Way that we

214
00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:42.720
<v Speaker 3>see all around us today.

215
00:10:43.000 --> 00:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a direct probe into the history of cosmic construction.

216
00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:48.279
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the most direct probes we could ever

217
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>hope for.

218
00:10:48.960 --> 00:10:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about the size differences, because this is

219
00:10:51.919 --> 00:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>really where the assumptions that everyone was making fundamentally went wrong.

220
00:10:56.559 --> 00:11:00.440
<v Speaker 2>When we say supermassive black holes, it sounds like one category,

221
00:11:00.440 --> 00:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's not not at all.

222
00:11:01.639 --> 00:11:05.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge category that spans an enormous range of masses.

223
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:07.039
<v Speaker 2>So on the upper end, what are we talking about.

224
00:11:07.200 --> 00:11:09.759
<v Speaker 3>On the upper end, you have the true giants. These

225
00:11:09.759 --> 00:11:13.559
<v Speaker 3>are SMBHs with a mass equal to billions of times

226
00:11:13.559 --> 00:11:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the mass of our Sun. These are the absolute powerhouses,

227
00:11:17.159 --> 00:11:21.440
<v Speaker 3>capable of generating incredibly strong individual waves when they collide.

228
00:11:21.519 --> 00:11:23.039
<v Speaker 2>The heavyweights of the universe.

229
00:11:23.120 --> 00:11:26.519
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. But then you have the secondary category, which.

230
00:11:26.320 --> 00:11:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Are still huge by any normal standard.

231
00:11:28.759 --> 00:11:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, of course, you have the ones that are still

232
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:33.759
<v Speaker 3>super massive, but as the study says, slightly less so,

233
00:11:34.399 --> 00:11:37.440
<v Speaker 3>their masses are only millions of times larger than our Sun.

234
00:11:37.720 --> 00:11:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Only millions, right, So, in the context of a galaxy merger,

235
00:11:40.440 --> 00:11:43.240
<v Speaker 3>where you have say a billion Sun smbh meeting a

236
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:47.440
<v Speaker 3>million sun smbh, that million sun object is considered the

237
00:11:47.519 --> 00:11:51.279
<v Speaker 3>secondary or the smaller player in that particular dance.

238
00:11:51.639 --> 00:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is where we get to the crucial piece

239
00:11:53.639 --> 00:11:57.159
<v Speaker 2>of conventional wisdom that this new study completely challenged. Why

240
00:11:57.240 --> 00:12:01.200
<v Speaker 2>were those smaller black holes, the million million sun mass ones,

241
00:12:01.559 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 2>Why were they basically ignored in the models for the GWB.

242
00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:07.279
<v Speaker 3>It really came down to the basic physics of how

243
00:12:07.279 --> 00:12:10.519
<v Speaker 3>gravitational waves are generated. The amplitude, or the strength of

244
00:12:10.519 --> 00:12:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the wave, scales very significantly with the mass of the

245
00:12:13.519 --> 00:12:14.639
<v Speaker 3>objects that are colliding.

246
00:12:14.720 --> 00:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>The bigger the splasher is the bigger the wave exactly.

247
00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:20.840
<v Speaker 3>And because the waves produced by a merger between two

248
00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>billion sun SMBHs are so overwhelmingly powerful, the prevailing theoretical

249
00:12:26.159 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>models basically assumed that the cumuative contribution from all those

250
00:12:30.200 --> 00:12:33.200
<v Speaker 3>smaller million sun black holes would just be negligible.

251
00:12:33.480 --> 00:12:36.440
<v Speaker 2>It would be lost in the noise from the bigger events.

252
00:12:36.159 --> 00:12:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Correct or that their contribution would be too low frequency

253
00:12:39.240 --> 00:12:42.039
<v Speaker 3>to be relevant to the bulk of what nanograph was

254
00:12:42.039 --> 00:12:42.759
<v Speaker 3>actually measuring.

255
00:12:43.279 --> 00:12:45.919
<v Speaker 2>So, to be clear, the models that existed before twenty

256
00:12:45.960 --> 00:12:49.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, they focused almost entirely on the biggest, most

257
00:12:49.399 --> 00:12:52.879
<v Speaker 2>massive sort of equal mass mergers, the big on big collisions.

258
00:12:53.159 --> 00:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right. They were trying to calculate the expected strength

259
00:12:56.000 --> 00:13:00.399
<v Speaker 3>of the GWB by focusing on those heavyweight fights. Assumed

260
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the contribution from all the big on small mergers was

261
00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:05.039
<v Speaker 3>just too quiet to really matter.

262
00:13:05.399 --> 00:13:08.399
<v Speaker 2>They minimized the role of the medium sized players in

263
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>this cosmic symphony.

264
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:12.639
<v Speaker 3>They did, they assumed a much more predictable pathway for

265
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:16.399
<v Speaker 3>how these things contributed. And it was that minimized expectation

266
00:13:16.600 --> 00:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that the NANOGRAVI anomaly just completely shattered. So let's really

267
00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>focus in on that specific data point, the one that

268
00:13:23.039 --> 00:13:27.840
<v Speaker 3>made all this new research necessary. When NANOGrav finally successfully

269
00:13:27.840 --> 00:13:30.759
<v Speaker 3>detected the GWB, they didn't just say we found it.

270
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:33.440
<v Speaker 3>They provided a measurement of its amplitude.

271
00:13:32.919 --> 00:13:35.519
<v Speaker 2>Its overall strength or loudness exactly.

272
00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:40.279
<v Speaker 3>And that amplitude measurement immediately, I mean immediately defied all

273
00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the expectation.

274
00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>And again we're not talking about it being just slightly off.

275
00:13:43.360 --> 00:13:45.879
<v Speaker 2>This wasn't a minor calibration issue.

276
00:13:45.559 --> 00:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>No, No, this was a significant statistical outlier. The measured

277
00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:51.559
<v Speaker 3>waves were substantially stronger than predicted.

278
00:13:51.639 --> 00:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>How much stronger are we talking the.

279
00:13:53.519 --> 00:13:56.559
<v Speaker 3>Est of its vary a bit, but perhaps as much

280
00:13:56.600 --> 00:14:00.559
<v Speaker 3>as fifty percent larger than what the most sophisticated current

281
00:14:00.600 --> 00:14:02.039
<v Speaker 3>theoretical models had predicted.

282
00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Fifty percent. Wow.

283
00:14:03.360 --> 00:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a huge number, and it forced astrophysicists into

284
00:14:07.120 --> 00:14:11.039
<v Speaker 3>a really difficult position. If the real universe is generating

285
00:14:11.120 --> 00:14:15.639
<v Speaker 3>ways that are this much stronger than we predict, then

286
00:14:15.679 --> 00:14:18.679
<v Speaker 3>our model is fundamentally flawed. Something is missing.

287
00:14:19.120 --> 00:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>So if the actual waves are bigger than the model predicted,

288
00:14:22.360 --> 00:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you're missing a source of amplification. And logically it seems

289
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>like you have two main paths to investigate that goo

290
00:14:28.399 --> 00:14:31.279
<v Speaker 2>One well, either there are just way more mergers happening

291
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:33.480
<v Speaker 2>across the cosmos than we thought there were, a higher

292
00:14:33.480 --> 00:14:36.519
<v Speaker 2>merger rate R or the black holes that are involved

293
00:14:36.519 --> 00:14:39.879
<v Speaker 2>in the mergers we do count are somehow effectively larger

294
00:14:39.919 --> 00:14:41.879
<v Speaker 2>than we assume them to be when they collide.

295
00:14:41.960 --> 00:14:44.799
<v Speaker 3>That's a perfect summary of the two main possibilities. And

296
00:14:44.840 --> 00:14:47.159
<v Speaker 3>this is where a critical point about the data comes in.

297
00:14:47.399 --> 00:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>If the discrepancy was simply because there were more mergers overall,

298
00:14:51.440 --> 00:14:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that higher merger rate, that would typically show up in

299
00:14:54.120 --> 00:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a different way in the GWB signal. It might change

300
00:14:57.240 --> 00:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the slope of the background spectrum across different frequencies.

301
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>We would change the character of the sound, not just

302
00:15:02.039 --> 00:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the volume.

303
00:15:02.679 --> 00:15:05.159
<v Speaker 3>A good way to put it, huh, but the specific

304
00:15:05.240 --> 00:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>shape and the magnitude of what NANOGrav detected. It strongly,

305
00:15:10.120 --> 00:15:14.279
<v Speaker 3>strongly favored the second idea that the individual events themselves

306
00:15:14.480 --> 00:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>were just more energetic.

307
00:15:16.120 --> 00:15:19.399
<v Speaker 2>So the data was pointing toward the mass involved in

308
00:15:19.480 --> 00:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the collisions being larger, not just the sheer number of

309
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:23.039
<v Speaker 2>collisions being higher.

310
00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. The conclusion was that the current models of how

311
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>these SMBH mergers work must be missing a key factor,

312
00:15:30.919 --> 00:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a factor that amplifies the wave strength right at that

313
00:15:33.679 --> 00:15:34.720
<v Speaker 3>moment of coalescence.

314
00:15:34.919 --> 00:15:37.679
<v Speaker 2>And if the solution wasn't something you know within the

315
00:15:37.720 --> 00:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>known physics of how galaxies evolve, what was the alternative.

316
00:15:41.720 --> 00:15:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, the alternative was what people started referring to as

317
00:15:44.360 --> 00:15:46.919
<v Speaker 3>requiring new exotic physics, which.

318
00:15:46.759 --> 00:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Is always exciting but also a little scary for physicists.

319
00:15:49.519 --> 00:15:53.159
<v Speaker 3>It is it means maybe there are entirely new populations

320
00:15:53.159 --> 00:15:56.159
<v Speaker 3>of black holes we don't know about, or some cosmological

321
00:15:56.159 --> 00:15:59.240
<v Speaker 3>phenomena we hadn't even conceived of. And this is why

322
00:15:59.279 --> 00:16:02.639
<v Speaker 3>that fifty percent discrepancy was so shocking. It opened the

323
00:16:02.679 --> 00:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>door to some pretty wild ideas.

324
00:16:04.440 --> 00:16:07.679
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to our swimming pool analogy. If

325
00:16:07.720 --> 00:16:10.559
<v Speaker 2>the waves in the cosmic pool are way bigger than

326
00:16:10.559 --> 00:16:13.639
<v Speaker 2>you expect, right, it means either we have a lot

327
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:16.759
<v Speaker 2>more swimmers in the pool than we counted, or the

328
00:16:16.799 --> 00:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>swimmers we did count are suddenly doing much much bigger

329
00:16:20.159 --> 00:16:22.759
<v Speaker 2>cannon balls than we estimated they could, and.

330
00:16:22.759 --> 00:16:25.080
<v Speaker 3>The data was just screaming that the cannon balls must

331
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:25.519
<v Speaker 3>be bigger.

332
00:16:25.759 --> 00:16:28.799
<v Speaker 2>So why does a bigger cannon ball make a bigger wave?

333
00:16:29.000 --> 00:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into the physics of that.

334
00:16:30.759 --> 00:16:33.679
<v Speaker 3>It goes right back to Einstein's theory of general relativity.

335
00:16:34.159 --> 00:16:37.759
<v Speaker 3>When these two immense masses spiral together and crash, the

336
00:16:37.799 --> 00:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>amount of energy that gets converted and released is Gravitational

337
00:16:40.799 --> 00:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>radiation scales nonlinearly.

338
00:16:43.799 --> 00:16:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Nonlinearly, meaning a small increase in mass gives you a

339
00:16:46.919 --> 00:16:48.279
<v Speaker 2>big increase in wave.

340
00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Strength, a disproportionately large increase in the gravitational wave amplitude.

341
00:16:53.279 --> 00:16:55.879
<v Speaker 3>It depends on the total mass of the system, but

342
00:16:55.960 --> 00:16:59.559
<v Speaker 3>also critically on the mass ratio between the two black holes.

343
00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.399
<v Speaker 2>So the logical conclusion here seems pretty inescapable. If the

344
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>measured waves were substantially larger than predicted.

345
00:17:06.839 --> 00:17:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Then the supermassive black holes involved in those mergers must

346
00:17:10.039 --> 00:17:13.279
<v Speaker 3>have had a larger effective mass right before they collided

347
00:17:13.640 --> 00:17:15.279
<v Speaker 3>than our models assumed they had.

348
00:17:15.559 --> 00:17:17.559
<v Speaker 2>They were heavier at the finish line than they were

349
00:17:17.559 --> 00:17:18.400
<v Speaker 2>at the starting line.

350
00:17:18.440 --> 00:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>In a manner of speaking, yes, and this is precisely

351
00:17:21.400 --> 00:17:24.839
<v Speaker 3>where the brilliant hypothesis developed by Commerford and Simon comes

352
00:17:24.839 --> 00:17:28.079
<v Speaker 3>into play. They decided to go back and revisit that

353
00:17:28.160 --> 00:17:29.440
<v Speaker 3>original assumption.

354
00:17:29.359 --> 00:17:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The one that said the smaller million sun black holes

355
00:17:32.200 --> 00:17:33.559
<v Speaker 2>didn't really matter exactly.

356
00:17:33.839 --> 00:17:36.559
<v Speaker 3>They started to ask a very simple question, what if

357
00:17:36.599 --> 00:17:39.839
<v Speaker 3>those black holes aren't that size right at the moment

358
00:17:39.880 --> 00:17:43.480
<v Speaker 3>the waves are created. What if? What if they grow

359
00:17:43.599 --> 00:17:46.200
<v Speaker 3>significantly during the merger process itself.

360
00:17:46.480 --> 00:17:49.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the intellectual pivot right there. That's what unlocks the

361
00:17:49.160 --> 00:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>whole mystery it is.

362
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:52.680
<v Speaker 3>It means you have to stop looking just at the

363
00:17:52.680 --> 00:17:55.519
<v Speaker 3>starting mass that we measure from galaxy surveys, and you

364
00:17:55.559 --> 00:17:58.119
<v Speaker 3>have to start looking at the dynamics during that several

365
00:17:58.119 --> 00:18:01.279
<v Speaker 3>million year period when the two black holes are spiraling

366
00:18:01.319 --> 00:18:02.119
<v Speaker 3>in toward each other.

367
00:18:02.720 --> 00:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>What happens in the dance itself?

368
00:18:04.720 --> 00:18:08.559
<v Speaker 3>Correct The researchers hypothesized, and this is based on some

369
00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:12.440
<v Speaker 3>hints from earlier simulations that when a smaller SMBH starts

370
00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:15.279
<v Speaker 3>to merge with a much larger one, something strange happens.

371
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:20.279
<v Speaker 3>The smaller black hole seems to undergo this incredible, unexpected

372
00:18:20.319 --> 00:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>growth spurt.

373
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:23.799
<v Speaker 2>It gains a lot of mass very quickly.

374
00:18:23.559 --> 00:18:25.880
<v Speaker 3>A lot of mass, pushing it up into a mass

375
00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>range where its eventual collision generates a wave that's powerful

376
00:18:30.200 --> 00:18:34.640
<v Speaker 3>enough to dramatically influence the GWB measurement. It transforms that

377
00:18:34.720 --> 00:18:38.200
<v Speaker 3>black hole from a negligible ripple maker into a significant

378
00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>cannonball maker.

379
00:18:39.160 --> 00:18:41.839
<v Speaker 2>So the player we had dismissed from the team as

380
00:18:41.920 --> 00:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>just a minor league contributor suddenly became a major force

381
00:18:45.039 --> 00:18:45.559
<v Speaker 2>on the field.

382
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:49.119
<v Speaker 3>And that unexpected extra energy from all these newly promoted

383
00:18:49.119 --> 00:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>players provided the missing fifty percent amplification. It was exactly

384
00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:55.359
<v Speaker 3>what was needed to match the nanograph data.

385
00:18:55.359 --> 00:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>And this mechanism, this differential growth, that's the key.

386
00:18:58.559 --> 00:19:02.119
<v Speaker 3>It's the key to resolving the whole anomaly. It explains

387
00:19:02.160 --> 00:19:05.359
<v Speaker 3>where all that extra wave amplitude comes from without needing

388
00:19:05.440 --> 00:19:08.920
<v Speaker 3>to invent any new or unknown forces. It just means

389
00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:11.599
<v Speaker 3>our calculation of the black hole's mass at the moment

390
00:19:11.599 --> 00:19:15.480
<v Speaker 3>of collision was wrong because we weren't correctly accounting for

391
00:19:15.519 --> 00:19:16.839
<v Speaker 3>how much they eat along the way.

392
00:19:16.960 --> 00:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So this is where the discussion really gets into the

393
00:19:19.000 --> 00:19:22.440
<v Speaker 2>nitty gritty physics of how this growth spurt actually happens.

394
00:19:22.480 --> 00:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>And what's so great about this explanation is that it's

395
00:19:25.039 --> 00:19:30.079
<v Speaker 2>not some mysterious new phenomenon. It's a simple, almost elegant

396
00:19:30.119 --> 00:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>quirk of geometry and the environment during the merger.

397
00:19:33.359 --> 00:19:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, what the scientists termed preferential accretion.

398
00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Preferential accretion.

399
00:19:37.759 --> 00:19:39.799
<v Speaker 3>Let's break that down to understand it. We first have

400
00:19:39.880 --> 00:19:43.400
<v Speaker 3>to really visualize the environment. We need to remember that

401
00:19:43.480 --> 00:19:46.920
<v Speaker 3>a galaxy merger is anything but a clean, neat event.

402
00:19:47.559 --> 00:19:51.079
<v Speaker 3>When two huge galaxies collide, the entire system is just

403
00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:52.319
<v Speaker 3>violently disturbed.

404
00:19:52.440 --> 00:19:54.799
<v Speaker 2>The source material called it a messy affair, and.

405
00:19:54.759 --> 00:19:57.400
<v Speaker 3>That's putting it mildly. It is a colossal disturbance on

406
00:19:57.440 --> 00:20:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a galactic scale, and crucially, all all the massive amounts

407
00:20:01.200 --> 00:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of gas, which is the primary raw fuel for making

408
00:20:04.039 --> 00:20:07.079
<v Speaker 3>stars and for growing black holes. That gas from both

409
00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:11.279
<v Speaker 3>of the original galaxies gets violently shocked and starts to

410
00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:15.319
<v Speaker 3>funnel inward toward the center of this new combined system

411
00:20:15.359 --> 00:20:17.759
<v Speaker 3>where the two black holes are spiraling around each other,

412
00:20:18.039 --> 00:20:18.440
<v Speaker 3>So all the.

413
00:20:18.400 --> 00:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Food in the new house gets pushed toward the two

414
00:20:20.440 --> 00:20:22.279
<v Speaker 2>biggest mounts exactly.

415
00:20:22.799 --> 00:20:25.839
<v Speaker 3>And this inflowing gas doesn't just fall in randomly. It

416
00:20:25.920 --> 00:20:30.039
<v Speaker 3>creates a specific structure that defines the entire feeding process.

417
00:20:30.079 --> 00:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>And what does that structure look like?

418
00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>It creates a large, dense, doughnut shaped cloud of gas

419
00:20:36.279 --> 00:20:39.039
<v Speaker 3>that surrounds the binary black hole system at the center.

420
00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>This cloud is absolutely vital because the gas it contains

421
00:20:42.400 --> 00:20:44.319
<v Speaker 3>will eventually fall back into the black.

422
00:20:44.079 --> 00:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Holes, a process called accretion.

423
00:20:46.440 --> 00:20:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, And this accretion is what causes the black holes

424
00:20:49.160 --> 00:20:52.200
<v Speaker 3>to grow larger. It's also what releases em months amounts

425
00:20:52.200 --> 00:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of energy, sometimes making the galaxy center shine as a

426
00:20:55.440 --> 00:20:56.319
<v Speaker 3>brilliant quasar.

427
00:20:56.799 --> 00:20:58.559
<v Speaker 2>Let's spend just a moment on the physics of that

428
00:20:58.559 --> 00:21:01.920
<v Speaker 2>accretion process, because it's not just stuff falling gently into

429
00:21:01.920 --> 00:21:02.319
<v Speaker 2>a hole.

430
00:21:02.440 --> 00:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>No, it is a highly dynamic and incredibly efficient process.

431
00:21:06.960 --> 00:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>As the gas spirals inward, it doesn't fall straight in

432
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:12.599
<v Speaker 3>because it has angular momentum. It forms a disk, an

433
00:21:12.599 --> 00:21:16.920
<v Speaker 3>accretion desk, yes, And in that disk, friction and gravitational

434
00:21:17.000 --> 00:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>shear cause the gas to heat up to millions of degrees.

435
00:21:20.079 --> 00:21:24.279
<v Speaker 3>It becomes an intensely hot, glowing plasma. And it's the

436
00:21:24.279 --> 00:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>sheer efficiency of converting mass into energy through this frictional

437
00:21:28.039 --> 00:21:30.960
<v Speaker 3>process that allows black holes to grow so rapidly and

438
00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:35.279
<v Speaker 3>release such immense power. The material spirals in, sheds its

439
00:21:35.279 --> 00:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>angular momentum, and finally crosses the event horizon.

440
00:21:38.759 --> 00:21:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we have the picture two black holes, one

441
00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:44.599
<v Speaker 2>massive one and a secondary, smaller one, and they're spiraling

442
00:21:44.680 --> 00:21:48.599
<v Speaker 2>toward each other inside this massive, hot, gaseous doughnut. The

443
00:21:48.720 --> 00:21:51.319
<v Speaker 2>question is why does the smaller one get the lion's

444
00:21:51.319 --> 00:21:52.200
<v Speaker 2>share of the food.

445
00:21:52.559 --> 00:21:55.559
<v Speaker 3>This is the core aha moment, and it was revealed

446
00:21:55.599 --> 00:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>by some previous computational simulations that Comerford and her team

447
00:21:59.079 --> 00:22:02.319
<v Speaker 3>studied very close, and it comes down entirely to where

448
00:22:02.359 --> 00:22:05.559
<v Speaker 3>the two black holes are located spatially within that gas cloud.

449
00:22:05.640 --> 00:22:08.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a cosmic real estate issue, location, location, location.

450
00:22:08.599 --> 00:22:12.279
<v Speaker 3>It's precisely that location determines destiny. In this case, let's

451
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>look at the critical positions of the two black holes.

452
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:18.240
<v Speaker 3>The more massive black hole, because it's the gravitationally dominant partner,

453
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:21.279
<v Speaker 3>it tends to carve out a path for itself closer

454
00:22:21.279 --> 00:22:23.599
<v Speaker 3>to what we call the Barry center. That's the gravitational

455
00:22:23.599 --> 00:22:25.359
<v Speaker 3>center of the whole binary system's orbit.

456
00:22:25.480 --> 00:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's right in the middle, and intuitively, you'd think

457
00:22:28.480 --> 00:22:30.319
<v Speaker 2>that's a prime spot, that's where you want to be

458
00:22:30.440 --> 00:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to capture the most gas.

459
00:22:31.720 --> 00:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>You would absolutely think so. But here is the completely

460
00:22:34.759 --> 00:22:38.839
<v Speaker 3>unexpected twist. Because of the complex dynamics of the accretion disc,

461
00:22:38.920 --> 00:22:42.119
<v Speaker 3>things like centrifugal forces and the way the two black

462
00:22:42.119 --> 00:22:45.400
<v Speaker 3>holes orbit and clear out gas. The very center of

463
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:48.839
<v Speaker 3>that doughnut, the region closest to the larger black hole, yes,

464
00:22:49.200 --> 00:22:52.279
<v Speaker 3>is actually where the gas is sparsest. It's a low

465
00:22:52.319 --> 00:22:54.440
<v Speaker 3>density region. It's almost like a hole in the middle.

466
00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Of the donut, you're kidding. So there's a surprising famine

467
00:22:57.839 --> 00:22:59.839
<v Speaker 2>zone right where the biggest mouth is sitting.

468
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:06.119
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Meanwhile, the smaller black hole, the secondary SMBH, is

469
00:23:06.200 --> 00:23:10.559
<v Speaker 3>forced by the binary's orbital mechanics to orbit a little

470
00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:13.799
<v Speaker 3>bit further out from that central Berry center. Okay, its

471
00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:17.359
<v Speaker 3>orbit is situated much much closer to the dense inner

472
00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:19.880
<v Speaker 3>rings of that gas doughnut structure.

473
00:23:20.119 --> 00:23:23.640
<v Speaker 2>So the smaller black hole is perfectly positioned to intercept

474
00:23:23.680 --> 00:23:28.519
<v Speaker 2>the maximum amount of all that fresh inflowing fuel before

475
00:23:28.559 --> 00:23:31.039
<v Speaker 2>it even gets to that sparse region in the very center.

476
00:23:31.240 --> 00:23:34.319
<v Speaker 3>That is the defining takeaway. The gas is being funneled

477
00:23:34.319 --> 00:23:37.799
<v Speaker 3>inward from all directions, but because the smaller black hole

478
00:23:37.839 --> 00:23:40.839
<v Speaker 3>is located further out, it's closer to where the bulk

479
00:23:40.880 --> 00:23:44.519
<v Speaker 3>of the available fuel is constantly being replenished. The secondary

480
00:23:44.519 --> 00:23:49.160
<v Speaker 3>black hole just intercepts and preferentially accretes more of that

481
00:23:49.200 --> 00:23:50.759
<v Speaker 3>fuel than its gigantic partner.

482
00:23:50.880 --> 00:23:52.519
<v Speaker 2>And that is preferential accretion.

483
00:23:52.960 --> 00:23:53.839
<v Speaker 3>That's the mechanism.

484
00:23:53.880 --> 00:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>That distinction is just incredible. It's not that the smaller

485
00:23:56.359 --> 00:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>black hole is gravitationally stronger, or that it's inherently hungrier.

486
00:24:00.160 --> 00:24:03.079
<v Speaker 2>It's that the flow dynamics of the gas dictated by

487
00:24:03.079 --> 00:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the orbit and the geometry of the merger simply give

488
00:24:06.039 --> 00:24:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the feeding advantage to the secondary black hole.

489
00:24:08.759 --> 00:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>It completely overtwins the intuitive assumption that the most massive

490
00:24:12.519 --> 00:24:16.480
<v Speaker 3>object always dominates the feeding process. The massive one may

491
00:24:16.519 --> 00:24:19.599
<v Speaker 3>have more raw gravitational power, but the environment of the

492
00:24:19.640 --> 00:24:23.880
<v Speaker 3>merger gives the secondary black hole the superior geometric position

493
00:24:23.960 --> 00:24:25.720
<v Speaker 3>during that crucial spiraling phase.

494
00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Now let's talk about the significance of this. So the

495
00:24:28.000 --> 00:24:31.640
<v Speaker 2>smaller one goes faster, but it's still way smaller than

496
00:24:31.680 --> 00:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the original behemoth.

497
00:24:32.839 --> 00:24:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Right.

498
00:24:33.759 --> 00:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Why is this ten percent or twenty percent growth so

499
00:24:36.720 --> 00:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>incredibly consequential for the gravitational wafe background.

500
00:24:39.799 --> 00:24:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Because the entire process, this inspiral phase, lasts for millions

501
00:24:44.960 --> 00:24:45.279
<v Speaker 3>of years.

502
00:24:45.400 --> 00:24:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Right. It's not a quick event.

503
00:24:46.640 --> 00:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Not at all. So even a small preferential gain in

504
00:24:50.039 --> 00:24:53.519
<v Speaker 3>its mass accretion rate, if you sustain that over the

505
00:24:53.680 --> 00:24:56.279
<v Speaker 3>entire time scale that the black holes are spiraling and

506
00:24:56.319 --> 00:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>accelerating towards their collision, it can drastically change the fre

507
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:01.799
<v Speaker 3>final mass of that secondary black hole.

508
00:25:02.000 --> 00:25:04.559
<v Speaker 2>We're not talking about a small change. Then over millions

509
00:25:04.559 --> 00:25:07.799
<v Speaker 2>of years, you could be adding what tens of millions

510
00:25:07.839 --> 00:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of solar masses to that smaller black hole right before

511
00:25:10.480 --> 00:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>impact exactly.

512
00:25:11.759 --> 00:25:14.599
<v Speaker 3>And since, as we said, the gravitational wave amplitude scale

513
00:25:14.640 --> 00:25:17.279
<v Speaker 3>so dramatically with the mass of the colliding objects or

514
00:25:17.359 --> 00:25:20.559
<v Speaker 3>cannonball analogy, that final state of the secondary black hole

515
00:25:21.000 --> 00:25:23.599
<v Speaker 3>is now heavy enough to produce a much much stronger

516
00:25:23.640 --> 00:25:26.680
<v Speaker 3>wave than what its original pre merger mass would have ever.

517
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Predicted, and that provides the necessary amplification to match the

518
00:25:29.839 --> 00:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>stronger nanograph data.

519
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:35.200
<v Speaker 3>It's the missing piece. It shows how a subtle dynamic

520
00:25:35.279 --> 00:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>detail happening across these vast cosmic time scales can cascade

521
00:25:40.200 --> 00:25:43.319
<v Speaker 3>up into a massive cosmological effect that we can actually

522
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:44.000
<v Speaker 3>measure today.

523
00:25:44.000 --> 00:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>But wait, let me just challenge this a little bit.

524
00:25:46.079 --> 00:25:49.240
<v Speaker 2>If the smaller one is growing so fast, why doesn't

525
00:25:49.240 --> 00:25:51.400
<v Speaker 2>it eventually catch up to the massive one. Why don't

526
00:25:51.440 --> 00:25:54.200
<v Speaker 2>you end up with a near equal mass merger which

527
00:25:54.240 --> 00:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>would produce an even stronger wave.

528
00:25:56.799 --> 00:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>That is a fan passed to question, and the answer

529
00:25:59.079 --> 00:26:02.599
<v Speaker 3>is that while it is going preferentially, it rarely, if ever,

530
00:26:02.759 --> 00:26:06.440
<v Speaker 3>manages to fully equalize the masses. The initial mass difference

531
00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:09.400
<v Speaker 3>is just too enormous to overcome. A million versus a

532
00:26:09.400 --> 00:26:10.720
<v Speaker 3>billion is a huge gap.

533
00:26:10.839 --> 00:26:12.839
<v Speaker 2>So it closes the gap, but doesn't erase it.

534
00:26:12.920 --> 00:26:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, And this is critical. The efficiency of gravitational wave

535
00:26:16.359 --> 00:26:19.519
<v Speaker 3>generation is maximized when the two merging black holes are

536
00:26:19.599 --> 00:26:22.559
<v Speaker 3>closer to being equal in mass. So by preferentially growing

537
00:26:22.599 --> 00:26:25.240
<v Speaker 3>that smaller partner, you are making the mass ratio closer

538
00:26:25.240 --> 00:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>to one to one, and that dramatically increases the power

539
00:26:28.240 --> 00:26:30.319
<v Speaker 3>of the final wave output compared to what you would

540
00:26:30.319 --> 00:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>get from a highly unequal mass merger.

541
00:26:32.200 --> 00:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just about making the smaller one bigger.

542
00:26:34.279 --> 00:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>It's about making the pair a more efficient wave generator.

543
00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:41.400
<v Speaker 3>That's the key. That refinement in the mass ratio is

544
00:26:41.440 --> 00:26:45.119
<v Speaker 3>the true source of the enhanced GWB amplitude.

545
00:26:45.240 --> 00:26:47.839
<v Speaker 2>I have to say this research has such an intellectually

546
00:26:47.880 --> 00:26:51.279
<v Speaker 2>satisfying conclusion to it. They didn't just find a problem.

547
00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:55.640
<v Speaker 2>They identified a physical mechanism, this preferential accretion, and then

548
00:26:55.720 --> 00:26:59.519
<v Speaker 2>they rigorously tested whether putting that one single effect into

549
00:26:59.519 --> 00:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the existing models could actually solve this real world observed

550
00:27:04.359 --> 00:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>cosmological mystery.

551
00:27:06.119 --> 00:27:08.640
<v Speaker 3>The methodology they used the CU Boulder team was just

552
00:27:08.680 --> 00:27:12.359
<v Speaker 3>wonderfully targeted. The lead researcher, Julie Comerford, she started with

553
00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:15.559
<v Speaker 3>this detailed set of equations that already captured all the

554
00:27:15.559 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 3>known physics of galaxy.

555
00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Mergers, so the standard models, the ones that were failing

556
00:27:19.920 --> 00:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to match the nanograb data exactly.

557
00:27:22.039 --> 00:27:25.119
<v Speaker 3>And then she and her team made one single adjustment

558
00:27:25.160 --> 00:27:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to these complex theoretical frameworks, just one tweak, one tweak,

559
00:27:28.799 --> 00:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>based on the physics that they inferred from watching the

560
00:27:31.000 --> 00:27:34.359
<v Speaker 3>gas dynamics in those simulations, they adjusted the growth rates

561
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:37.519
<v Speaker 3>within their equations to specifically model that differential growth.

562
00:27:37.400 --> 00:27:40.039
<v Speaker 2>Dynamic and that's where the ten percent figure comes in.

563
00:27:40.599 --> 00:27:44.160
<v Speaker 2>They modeled this preferential accretion by making the smaller black

564
00:27:44.160 --> 00:27:47.119
<v Speaker 2>holes grow specifically ten percent more than the larger ones.

565
00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:47.680
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

566
00:27:47.799 --> 00:27:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Why that number? Why ten percent? Was that just a

567
00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>random guess or did the physics actually dictate that specific number.

568
00:27:54.559 --> 00:27:56.799
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't arbitrary at all. That ten percent figure was

569
00:27:56.839 --> 00:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>arrived at iteratively. They ran detailed newmerical models of the

570
00:28:01.000 --> 00:28:04.559
<v Speaker 3>accretion process over these long time scales. They were looking

571
00:28:04.559 --> 00:28:08.440
<v Speaker 3>for the minimum necessary increase in mass amplification for that

572
00:28:08.559 --> 00:28:11.319
<v Speaker 3>secondary black hole that will be required to push the

573
00:28:11.519 --> 00:28:13.799
<v Speaker 3>predict GWB amplitude high.

574
00:28:13.720 --> 00:28:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Enough to close that fifty percent gap.

575
00:28:15.559 --> 00:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>To close the gap, and their simulations suggested that, given

576
00:28:19.720 --> 00:28:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the geometry and the orbital mechanics we talked about, a

577
00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:25.720
<v Speaker 3>preferential gain of around ten percent was a physically plausible,

578
00:28:25.799 --> 00:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>even conservative estimate for what was required.

579
00:28:28.240 --> 00:28:30.480
<v Speaker 2>So it wasn't just a mathematical plug in number. It

580
00:28:30.519 --> 00:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>was an estimate that was actually rooted in the observed

581
00:28:32.960 --> 00:28:34.759
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of the gas density and.

582
00:28:34.720 --> 00:28:37.759
<v Speaker 3>The flow exactly. And the outcome of making this one

583
00:28:37.799 --> 00:28:40.839
<v Speaker 3>specific adjustment was well, it was definitive.

584
00:28:40.480 --> 00:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>What happened when they ran the models again.

585
00:28:42.240 --> 00:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>It was immediate and conclusive. That single ten percent quick

586
00:28:47.000 --> 00:28:50.880
<v Speaker 3>modeling that slightly accelerated growth of the secondary SMBH during

587
00:28:50.920 --> 00:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>the inspiral it was precisely enough to reconcile that long

588
00:28:54.799 --> 00:28:59.240
<v Speaker 3>standing discrepancy the revised estimates of the gravitational wave background. Now,

589
00:28:59.279 --> 00:29:02.319
<v Speaker 3>with this preference growth baked in, they lined up perfectly

590
00:29:02.359 --> 00:29:05.640
<v Speaker 3>with the actual surprising measurements from the NANOGrav experiment.

591
00:29:05.720 --> 00:29:09.559
<v Speaker 2>So the mystery just it solved itself, not by adding

592
00:29:09.680 --> 00:29:12.039
<v Speaker 2>some new exotic object to the universe, but just by

593
00:29:12.119 --> 00:29:15.599
<v Speaker 2>understanding that we were grossly underestimating the smaller black holes

594
00:29:15.960 --> 00:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>right up until the moment of impact.

595
00:29:17.759 --> 00:29:19.960
<v Speaker 3>We were underestimating how much fatter they were getting and

596
00:29:20.000 --> 00:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>how much faster than we ever saw. It really is,

597
00:29:22.720 --> 00:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and it reinforces the central takeaway from their study, which

598
00:29:25.400 --> 00:29:27.720
<v Speaker 3>is that the little ones they do start out small,

599
00:29:27.759 --> 00:29:30.279
<v Speaker 3>but as they put it, because the little ones grow

600
00:29:30.319 --> 00:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the most, they shouldn't be discounted. Their accelerated growth during

601
00:29:34.240 --> 00:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that merger phase transforms them into really effective contributors to

602
00:29:38.519 --> 00:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the overall background noise, strong enough to explain the entire

603
00:29:42.279 --> 00:29:43.279
<v Speaker 3>amplitude anomaly.

604
00:29:43.599 --> 00:29:46.119
<v Speaker 2>This feels like a major victory for the refinement of

605
00:29:46.160 --> 00:29:50.480
<v Speaker 2>these astrophysical models, especially for this new field of nanahertz

606
00:29:50.519 --> 00:29:55.279
<v Speaker 2>gravitational waves. But the team is rightly careful. They note

607
00:29:55.279 --> 00:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that this is a possible solution, not the complete final answer.

608
00:29:59.519 --> 00:30:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Any good scientists would.

609
00:30:01.079 --> 00:30:05.559
<v Speaker 2>So the mathematical model works beautifully, but science demands empirical validation.

610
00:30:05.920 --> 00:30:07.759
<v Speaker 2>What are the next steps? How do you go about

611
00:30:07.839 --> 00:30:09.400
<v Speaker 2>confirming this hypothesis?

612
00:30:09.680 --> 00:30:13.319
<v Speaker 3>That next phase is absolutely crucial, and it's also incredibly difficult.

613
00:30:13.720 --> 00:30:17.640
<v Speaker 3>While the math provides this really strong, circumstantial evidence, the

614
00:30:17.680 --> 00:30:22.240
<v Speaker 3>scientific process now demands observation. So the team has already

615
00:30:22.319 --> 00:30:25.480
<v Speaker 3>launched a new effort that's focused on observing real galaxies

616
00:30:25.720 --> 00:30:27.279
<v Speaker 3>that are currently in the act of merging.

617
00:30:27.480 --> 00:30:30.559
<v Speaker 2>They need to catch this preferential accretion happening in the wild,

618
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:33.880
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, before the final collision happens precisely.

619
00:30:33.960 --> 00:30:36.160
<v Speaker 3>And this is a huge challenge because these mergers take

620
00:30:36.240 --> 00:30:38.839
<v Speaker 3>millions of years to unfold and the objects are just

621
00:30:38.920 --> 00:30:42.359
<v Speaker 3>vastly distant. You need extremely sensitive telescopes to be able

622
00:30:42.359 --> 00:30:45.839
<v Speaker 3>to resolve the gas dynamics and these binary black hole systems.

623
00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:47.559
<v Speaker 2>What are they looking for specifically?

624
00:30:47.960 --> 00:30:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Specifically, they need to measure the gas density distribution right

625
00:30:51.720 --> 00:30:55.599
<v Speaker 3>around the spiraling pair, and if it's even possible, they

626
00:30:55.599 --> 00:30:58.079
<v Speaker 3>need to try and measure the actual accretion rates onto

627
00:30:58.079 --> 00:31:00.599
<v Speaker 3>both the primary and the secondary black holes.

628
00:31:00.680 --> 00:31:03.359
<v Speaker 2>And what would be the smoking gun, What specific evidence

629
00:31:03.359 --> 00:31:04.839
<v Speaker 2>would constitute conformation.

630
00:31:05.519 --> 00:31:09.839
<v Speaker 3>The smoking gun would be if their telescopic observations consistently

631
00:31:09.920 --> 00:31:14.039
<v Speaker 3>show across multiple merging systems that the gas distribution is

632
00:31:14.079 --> 00:31:18.200
<v Speaker 3>indeed geometrically skewed, that the smaller black hole is consistently

633
00:31:18.200 --> 00:31:21.599
<v Speaker 3>sitting in a denser region of that inflowing material.

634
00:31:21.519 --> 00:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>And then show that it's actually eating more.

635
00:31:23.880 --> 00:31:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, if they can also show that the smaller black

636
00:31:27.039 --> 00:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>hole has evidence of a higher accretion rate relative to

637
00:31:29.960 --> 00:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the gas that's available to the larger black hole, that

638
00:31:33.039 --> 00:31:36.200
<v Speaker 3>would provide the necessary empirical conformation. You would prove that

639
00:31:36.279 --> 00:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>preferential accretion isn't just a good idea in the simulation,

640
00:31:39.640 --> 00:31:42.720
<v Speaker 3>but a dominant mechanism in these mergers across the cosmos.

641
00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:45.759
<v Speaker 2>So, if we to zoom out one last time, how

642
00:31:45.799 --> 00:31:51.200
<v Speaker 2>does resolving this nanohertz gravitational wave mystery, how does it

643
00:31:51.240 --> 00:31:54.799
<v Speaker 2>connect to the biggest, broadest cosmic picture. What's the real

644
00:31:54.880 --> 00:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>relevance of this work for you listening at home, trying

645
00:31:58.480 --> 00:31:59.759
<v Speaker 2>to understand how the universe.

646
00:31:59.799 --> 00:32:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Of this research, it really tackles one of the most

647
00:32:03.440 --> 00:32:07.279
<v Speaker 3>fundamental and enduring scientific questions there is, which is the

648
00:32:07.319 --> 00:32:11.400
<v Speaker 3>formation and the evolution of supermassive black holes themselves.

649
00:32:11.519 --> 00:32:13.279
<v Speaker 2>How they got so big so fast?

650
00:32:13.440 --> 00:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, despite decades of incredible advancements, we still have these

651
00:32:18.000 --> 00:32:21.599
<v Speaker 3>massive gaps in our knowledge about how these cosmic behemoths

652
00:32:21.880 --> 00:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>form so quickly in the early universe. As Commerford herself

653
00:32:25.519 --> 00:32:28.359
<v Speaker 3>notes in the study, I've spent my career studying supermassive

654
00:32:28.359 --> 00:32:30.440
<v Speaker 3>black holes and we don't even know how they form.

655
00:32:30.440 --> 00:32:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Which is truly an astonishing statement when you think about it,

656
00:32:33.359 --> 00:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that nearly every major galaxy is built around one of

657
00:32:35.720 --> 00:32:37.799
<v Speaker 2>these things, and we don't know where they came from.

658
00:32:37.960 --> 00:32:40.759
<v Speaker 3>It is, and this study provides a crucial piece of

659
00:32:40.759 --> 00:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>that puzzle, specifically regarding the growth mechanism. It helps us

660
00:32:45.440 --> 00:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>tackle the question of how the black hole seeds in

661
00:32:48.519 --> 00:32:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the very first primordial galaxies, which were tiny and made

662
00:32:51.759 --> 00:32:54.759
<v Speaker 3>up mostly of gas, how they could have possibly built

663
00:32:54.759 --> 00:32:57.599
<v Speaker 3>themselves up to the gigantic black holes that we see

664
00:32:57.640 --> 00:32:58.440
<v Speaker 3>existing today.

665
00:32:58.799 --> 00:33:01.720
<v Speaker 2>And the early universe was immensely gas rich. So if

666
00:33:01.759 --> 00:33:05.079
<v Speaker 2>this preferential accretion mechanism is a dominant growth mode, it

667
00:33:05.079 --> 00:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>would have been incredibly efficient back then.

668
00:33:07.319 --> 00:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, think about it. If a merger in the

669
00:33:09.920 --> 00:33:13.559
<v Speaker 3>early universe where gas was just everywhere consistently meant that

670
00:33:13.599 --> 00:33:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the secondary, smaller black hole underwent a dramatic ten percent

671
00:33:17.480 --> 00:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>or more growth spurt. That provides a very rapid and

672
00:33:20.799 --> 00:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>very efficient pathway to build up huge black hole masses

673
00:33:24.359 --> 00:33:26.839
<v Speaker 3>in a relatively short cosmological timescale.

674
00:33:27.039 --> 00:33:29.799
<v Speaker 2>So mergers aren't just about building bigger galaxies. They're the

675
00:33:29.839 --> 00:33:31.839
<v Speaker 2>primary engine for building bigger black holes.

676
00:33:31.839 --> 00:33:36.039
<v Speaker 3>It suggests they are particularly for the already existing smaller seeds.

677
00:33:36.279 --> 00:33:39.440
<v Speaker 3>It gives us a much clearer picture of the violent, messy,

678
00:33:39.519 --> 00:33:42.799
<v Speaker 3>yet highly effective process by which the universe assembled its

679
00:33:42.880 --> 00:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>largest and most powerful engines.

680
00:33:44.759 --> 00:33:47.319
<v Speaker 2>This has been a truly fascinating dive into one of

681
00:33:47.319 --> 00:33:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the universe's greatest new riddles. So to quickly recap the

682
00:33:51.480 --> 00:33:55.359
<v Speaker 2>journey for everyone, scientists detected the gravitational wave background back

683
00:33:55.400 --> 00:33:59.359
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three, confirming this rithmic oscillation of space

684
00:33:59.400 --> 00:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>time itself. But there was a problem, a big one.

685
00:34:03.400 --> 00:34:07.000
<v Speaker 3>The waves were surprisingly strong. They were too big, too

686
00:34:07.160 --> 00:34:10.519
<v Speaker 3>loud for the sophisticated models, which had really emphasized the

687
00:34:10.559 --> 00:34:13.280
<v Speaker 3>mergers between the biggest of the big.

688
00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Black holes, and the really elegant solution, the one proposed

689
00:34:16.360 --> 00:34:19.360
<v Speaker 2>by the CU Boulder team. It wasn't some giant new

690
00:34:19.360 --> 00:34:22.599
<v Speaker 2>phenomenon or exotic physics. It was something much more subtle.

691
00:34:22.840 --> 00:34:25.679
<v Speaker 2>It was the overlooked growth of the smaller black hole

692
00:34:25.800 --> 00:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>in emerging pair.

693
00:34:27.159 --> 00:34:30.800
<v Speaker 3>This preferential accretion. It happened simply because the smaller black

694
00:34:30.840 --> 00:34:34.760
<v Speaker 3>hole has a geometrically superior seat at the cosmic dinner table.

695
00:34:35.199 --> 00:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>It gets to intercept all that inflowing gas fuel before

696
00:34:37.920 --> 00:34:39.159
<v Speaker 3>its gigantic partner does.

697
00:34:39.199 --> 00:34:42.440
<v Speaker 2>And by just incorporating this ten percent preferential corethrate into

698
00:34:42.440 --> 00:34:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the models, suddenly everything clicked. The theoretical predictions aligned perfectly

699
00:34:47.000 --> 00:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>with the nanograph observations, and.

700
00:34:48.719 --> 00:34:51.199
<v Speaker 3>It provided this potent explanation for where all that extra

701
00:34:51.239 --> 00:34:52.559
<v Speaker 3>wave energy was coming from.

702
00:34:52.639 --> 00:34:56.679
<v Speaker 2>It's just a powerful reminder that sometimes the biggest cosmic

703
00:34:56.719 --> 00:34:59.840
<v Speaker 2>mysteries are solved by looking much closer at the dynamics

704
00:34:59.880 --> 00:35:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of the players that seem at first to be the smallest.

705
00:35:03.039 --> 00:35:06.159
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely and that really leads us with a final thought

706
00:35:06.159 --> 00:35:10.239
<v Speaker 3>freedom all over. We've shown that the dynamics of gas secretion,

707
00:35:10.760 --> 00:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>these messy environmental factors that happen inside a galaxy merger,

708
00:35:14.840 --> 00:35:18.000
<v Speaker 3>are just so vital. They dictate the final mass of

709
00:35:18.039 --> 00:35:21.519
<v Speaker 3>these supermassive black holes, and because of that, they dictate

710
00:35:21.559 --> 00:35:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the strength of the gravitational wave background that we measure today.

711
00:35:25.760 --> 00:35:28.559
<v Speaker 3>So if a subtle geometric advantage like that can completely

712
00:35:28.599 --> 00:35:32.880
<v Speaker 3>overturn our understanding of mass growth, what other seemingly minor

713
00:35:33.000 --> 00:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>environmental factors might be out there, things we haven't even

714
00:35:36.000 --> 00:35:39.679
<v Speaker 3>considered yet, maybe related to early stellar feedback or magnetic fields.

715
00:35:39.840 --> 00:35:43.159
<v Speaker 3>What other minor details might have secretly determined the characteristics

716
00:35:43.159 --> 00:35:46.599
<v Speaker 3>of every galaxy, including the specific merger history that shaped

717
00:35:46.639 --> 00:35:47.480
<v Speaker 3>our own Milky Way.

718
00:35:47.800 --> 00:35:51.239
<v Speaker 2>We've resolved one major discrepancy, but it opens the door

719
00:35:51.280 --> 00:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to so many more questions it does.

720
00:35:53.960 --> 00:35:57.360
<v Speaker 3>The implications of this discovery are a big reminder of

721
00:35:57.519 --> 00:36:00.519
<v Speaker 3>just how much is still fundamentally unknown about the formation

722
00:36:00.679 --> 00:37:51.440
<v Speaker 3>processes of the largest, most foundational objects in the entire cosmos.
