Speaker 1: You know a world of deceit, Telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it is Thursday, the twelfth
Speaker 2: of June, year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five, and
Speaker 2: there's a new COVID variant in town, but apparently nobody
Speaker 2: even noticed. An RFK Junior savages CNN over vaccine claims.
Speaker 2: Then we'll be talking to Tony Ardeburn about what's going
Speaker 2: on with gold as it passes the euro as the
Speaker 2: second largest reserve asset. Stay with us, Well, good morning.
Speaker 2: I hope you are all enjoying yourselves. It is a
Speaker 2: pleasure to be hosting the show today. As I said,
Speaker 2: we're going to start by looking at the new COVID
Speaker 2: arry in town. That's right, there's a boogeyman, but apparently
Speaker 2: he's not that scary anymore. Who is not able to
Speaker 2: gin up as much fear as they used to be?
Speaker 2: Maybe we won't get fooled again. This is what to
Speaker 2: know about the new Nimbus COVID bear. They didn't even
Speaker 2: give it a scary name this time. They didn't go
Speaker 2: for omicron or something like that. Who who cares? Is
Speaker 2: more like it. The World Health Organization is keeping an
Speaker 2: eye on a new COVID nineteen variant called NB dot
Speaker 2: one dot eight dot one, or Nimbus, that has spread
Speaker 2: across Europe, the Americas, and the Western Pacific. Nimbus is
Speaker 2: a descendant of the omicrone variant of the virus and
Speaker 2: was first identified in late January. Its spike mutations appear
Speaker 2: to make it more transmissible than other COVID nineteen variants.
Speaker 2: According to the WHO, spike mutations refer to changes in
Speaker 2: spike proteins, which sit on the surface of the virus
Speaker 2: and help it enter healthy cells if you buy into
Speaker 2: that sort of thing. While it is spreading in the
Speaker 2: US and Canada along with twenty other countries, it does
Speaker 2: not appear to be driving an increase in sickness or hospitalization. Oh,
Speaker 2: we all here know that the only pandemic was fear.
Speaker 2: That's what the pandemic was from COVID. It was fear
Speaker 2: that they instilled in people. They locked every one in
Speaker 2: their houses, made them all afraid. You can't go outside.
Speaker 2: You're gonna kill grandma. Grandma's gonna die because of you.
Speaker 2: You're gonna give it. The scary virus they ginned up
Speaker 2: the fake death numbers. They made it so that anyone
Speaker 2: who died with COVID, and of course the PCR test
Speaker 2: made it so anybody could be said to have COVID
Speaker 2: was listed as a COVID death. Even if you crashed
Speaker 2: a motorcycle and died from that, you were a COVID statistic.
Speaker 2: And the flu disappeared, and all other kinds of deaths
Speaker 2: disappeared as well, They were all lumped into COVID. It
Speaker 2: was never a real pandemic. In April, NB one dot
Speaker 2: eight dot one sequences made up ten point seven percent
Speaker 2: of all submitted sequences from confirmed COVID infections, up from
Speaker 2: two point five percent a month earlier. According to a
Speaker 2: risk evaluation released by the WHO. WHO last month deemed
Speaker 2: NB dot one dot eight dot one a variant under monitoring.
Speaker 2: We're just going to keep We're just going to call
Speaker 2: it nimbus from now on. Here's what to know about
Speaker 2: the variant. Where are the cases in the US. Most
Speaker 2: cases of the COVID of COVID nineteen to the US
Speaker 2: still stem from the LP dot one LP dot eight
Speaker 2: dot one strain. Another omicron descend it. But it looks
Speaker 2: like nimbus might soon replace it as the more common strain.
Speaker 2: According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Speaker 2: the CDC estmates at thirty thirty seven percent of COVID
Speaker 2: nineteen cases in the US stem from nb nimbus variant,
Speaker 2: while thirty eight percent are result of an infection of
Speaker 2: the LP dot eight dot one strain of the disease.
Speaker 2: At the end of May, the agency estimated the nimbus
Speaker 2: variant caused about fifteen percent of all COVID nineteen cases
Speaker 2: spooky with The agency notes on its website the due
Speaker 2: to low numbers of virus sequences being reported, precision in
Speaker 2: the most recent reporting period is low. The nimbus variant
Speaker 2: has been found in at least thirteen states, according to Today,
Speaker 2: which cited data from the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza.
Speaker 2: The data GISAID database. They love their acronyms and initialisms.
Speaker 2: They can't get enough of them. Those states are California,
Speaker 2: New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Arizona, Illinois, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Ohio,
Speaker 2: Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. The available data on
Speaker 2: nimbus suggests it poses a low global threat and that
Speaker 2: existing COVID nineteen vaccines provide adequate protection against severe illness
Speaker 2: and hospitalization, according to the WHO. That's right, those wonderful
Speaker 2: vaccines are still going strong with the push, aren't they.
Speaker 2: They provide adequate protection.
Speaker 3: Oh who, So, all I need to do is get
Speaker 3: my latest round of boosters and I'm fine.
Speaker 2: Exactly. You can't ever be boosted enough. You need more
Speaker 2: boost They're going to install a nitrous tank into the
Speaker 2: next vaccine. Currently approved COVID nineteen vaccines are expected to
Speaker 2: remain effective to this variant against symptomatic and severe disease.
Speaker 2: Of course, this is very different from when they were
Speaker 2: talking about homoicron. They were talking about having to get
Speaker 2: boosters and having to update the vaccines continually because this
Speaker 2: is scary, it's changing, it's evolving. You need a new booster.
Speaker 2: The old ones aren't good enough. You need an updated vaccine.
Speaker 2: You need to patch your firmware right now. Things apparently
Speaker 2: are changing. But who's risk evaluation reads. Despite a concurrent
Speaker 2: increase in cases and hospitalizations in some countries where nimbus
Speaker 2: is widespread, current data do not indicate that this variant
Speaker 2: leads to more severe illness than other variants. In circulation.
Speaker 2: Nyl Gresh, and international consultant at the WHO, told The
Speaker 2: Hill that many new cases in Canada are likely linked
Speaker 2: to the nimbus variant, but that there has not been
Speaker 2: any major changes in the country in terms of cases, hospitalizations,
Speaker 2: I see you admissions or death's link to COVID nineteen. Well,
Speaker 2: what are the very scary symptoms of the spooky nimbus variant.
Speaker 2: It's floating around like a cloud. You never know when
Speaker 2: you might run into it. Symptoms of nimbus seem to
Speaker 2: be similar to those associated with other omicrone variants, according
Speaker 2: to Gresh, which is to say, it's you know, flu, Like,
Speaker 2: if you get this whatever it is, you'll be kind
Speaker 2: of sick for a while and then okay, just as
Speaker 2: long as you don't go into a hospital and get
Speaker 2: a ventilator shoved down your throat, then you have about
Speaker 2: an eighty percent chance of passing away. What if they
Speaker 2: put you on remdesevere, that again raises your chances of death.
Speaker 2: Some common COVID nineteen symptoms include cough, fever, fatigue, muscle aches, congestion, headache, nausea, vomiting,
Speaker 2: and a new loss of smell or taste. According to
Speaker 2: the CDC, all such spooky, spooky side effects, we should
Speaker 2: be as concerned about nimbus as we are concerned for
Speaker 2: COVID in general. Gresch said, not more, not less. That's right.
Speaker 2: Remember the level of fear and panic they tried to instill.
Speaker 2: We should be just concerned about this, not more, not less.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: They've changed their tune a little bit, it seems, or
Speaker 2: maybe they've just instilled enough fear and panic into the
Speaker 2: average person that's saying these words now will trigger a
Speaker 2: Pavlovian response in them and get them all back in
Speaker 2: their homes. Some recent COVID nineteen patients have reported experiencing
Speaker 2: something called razor blade throat. According to Selon, razor blade
Speaker 2: throat sounds like a death metal band, but it is
Speaker 2: unclear if that symptom is connected to one of the
Speaker 2: COVID variants or maybe a thrash metal or another respiratory
Speaker 2: illness circulating. Ryan Gregory, an evolutionary and genombolish at University
Speaker 2: of Gwelph in Canada, told Salon, well, isn't that spooky
Speaker 2: razor blade throat? We've got some comments here. KWD sixty
Speaker 2: eight COVID destroyer of world's variant. That's right, that would
Speaker 2: be a more intimidating name, not Nimbus. Nimbus sounds friendly.
Speaker 2: Do not obey flu mysteriously disappeared, so weird. Pay no
Speaker 2: attention to the details. Focus on what the narrative drivers say.
Speaker 2: That's right. Don't believe your lying eyes. We have people
Speaker 2: that are paid to tell you what to think. You
Speaker 2: wouldn't want their paychecks going to waste, would you? Little
Speaker 2: Ford Schoolhouse. My mom passed away in December and I
Speaker 2: was getting ready to leave the hospital. The nurse told
Speaker 2: me that they would put the appropriate cause of death
Speaker 2: on her death certificate. I told her, as long as
Speaker 2: it didn't say she had COVID. And then I said,
Speaker 2: oh no. I tested her for that when she got
Speaker 2: here and it was negative. Like, why are we still
Speaker 2: testing for it? That's a good question.
Speaker 3: And of course that would be a PCR tests, which
Speaker 3: are notorious for their false positive. They can wrap that
Speaker 3: up to get a false positive on nearly anything with
Speaker 3: enough cycles.
Speaker 2: Yes, there was that famous story of some I believe
Speaker 2: it was African president who was also a genetic sister
Speaker 2: biologist or something, testing a piece of fruit and it
Speaker 2: came back as positive for COVID.
Speaker 3: And remember, as scary as this new horrifying variant is,
Speaker 3: it won't affect the protesters any more than the previous
Speaker 3: one affected the Black Lives Matter rioters. These rioters will
Speaker 3: be fine so long as you've got a Molotov cocktail
Speaker 3: that's way more effective than any mask.
Speaker 2: That's right now, this is a prescription molotov cocktail. I
Speaker 2: need to take it for my COVID. It comes with
Speaker 2: me everywhere I go, just in case. They're probably in
Speaker 2: much greater danger from breathing in the fumes of all
Speaker 2: those burning cars, especially if they happen to be burning
Speaker 2: electric cars. As I said, that is the information on
Speaker 2: the new COVID. Very it's very scary, very scary. Indeed,
Speaker 2: Nimbus is out there. It's just out in the ether,
Speaker 2: and we all need to be just as afraid of
Speaker 2: it as you were of COVID. But now we're going
Speaker 2: to look at what RFK had to say to CNN.
Speaker 2: He had some harsh words for them. RFK Junior rips
Speaker 2: CNN overclaims on vaccines and placebo controlled trials. This is
Speaker 2: from Children's Health Defense. CNN is wrong. Kennedy wrote, no,
Speaker 2: routine injected vaccine on CDC's schedule was a license for
Speaker 2: children based on a placebo controlled trial. In instances where
Speaker 2: a vaccine was used as a control, it too, was
Speaker 2: never licensed based on a placebo control trial. That is
Speaker 2: not conjecture. It is fact based on FDA's clinical trial data.
Speaker 2: This is from the editor's note in a post on
Speaker 2: x US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy Junior, dismantled claims made in a June sixth CNN
Speaker 2: article stating that the news team identify two hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty eight randomized controlled clinical trials of vaccines. More than
Speaker 2: half of those studies, one hundred fifty three tested vaccines
Speaker 2: against placebos, and one hundred and twenty seven of those
Speaker 2: studies used inert placebos. Below is the full, unaltered text
Speaker 2: of Kennedy's post. This is the post yesterday. I retired
Speaker 2: seventeen members of the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices or ACIP,
Speaker 2: the at CDC Gov. This is their handle on Twitter,
Speaker 2: external panel that wields the grave responsibility of adding new
Speaker 2: vaccines to the recommended childhood schedule. Over the coming days,
Speaker 2: I will use this platform to announce new members to
Speaker 2: populate ACIP, AKIP ASIP. None of these individuals be ideological
Speaker 2: anti vaxers. That's too bad, RFK, that's too bad.
Speaker 1: They should be.
Speaker 2: They should realize that they need these types of people
Speaker 2: in government. They will be highly credentialed physicians.
Speaker 1: Oh no, not.
Speaker 2: Highly credentialed physicians and scientists will make extremely consequential public
Speaker 2: health determinations by applying evidence based decision making with objectivity
Speaker 2: and common sense. Those I like. Those sound good. The
Speaker 2: highly credentialed phisicions and scientists makes a chill run down
Speaker 2: my spine. I think we've all had enough of highly
Speaker 2: credentialed doctors and scientists. I will also be tweeting examples
Speaker 2: of the historical corruption at ACIP ACIP to help the
Speaker 2: public understand why this clean sweep was necessary. The most
Speaker 2: outrageous example of acip's malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn
Speaker 2: unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines
Speaker 2: for our children. Today, a compliant American child receives between
Speaker 2: sixty nine and ninety two routine vaccines, depending on brand slash,
Speaker 2: dictated by dosage from conception to eighteen years of age.
Speaker 2: This is up from eleven shots in nineteen eighty six.
Speaker 2: ACIP has recommended each of these additional jabs without requiring
Speaker 2: placebo controlled trials for any of them. Means that no
Speaker 2: one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more
Speaker 2: problems than they are causing. We know why they don't
Speaker 2: want to do those trials, don't we It would show
Speaker 2: that they're not just not providing any benefit. They're hurting people.
Speaker 2: They're harming children, They're killing kids. They're aiming them for life.
Speaker 2: They're making a lot of money doing it too. They
Speaker 2: are making themselves rich. This is a big money maker
Speaker 2: for big pharma. We're actually going to play a quick
Speaker 2: video right here before I continue with it.
Speaker 4: Hi, everybody, I'm Robert F. Kennedy junior your age age
Speaker 4: as a secretary, and I'm here today with NIH Director
Speaker 4: doctor J. Bodicharia and FDA Commissioner Doctor Marty McCarry.
Speaker 1: I couldn't be more.
Speaker 4: Pleased to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccines
Speaker 4: healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from
Speaker 4: the CDC Recommended immunization schedule. Last year, the Biden administration
Speaker 4: urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite
Speaker 4: the lack of any political data to support the repeat
Speaker 4: booster strategy in children.
Speaker 5: That ends today.
Speaker 2: It's common sense, that's good science.
Speaker 6: There's no evidence healthy kids need it today, and most
Speaker 6: countries have stopped recommending it for children.
Speaker 4: Were now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise
Speaker 4: to make America healthy again.
Speaker 2: Well, he's making some good moves. He's not as committed
Speaker 2: as he was before he got the job. He still
Speaker 2: seems to have pulled back on his rhetoric, pulled back
Speaker 2: on his commitment to being anti vax he seems to
Speaker 2: fear that label. Well, most of us over here, we're.
Speaker 3: Proudly and all that is good news. That they've removed
Speaker 3: a recommendation for children and pregnant mothers. That is kind
Speaker 3: of a small step. Yeah, we've removed the recommendation. You
Speaker 3: can still take it if you're pregnant, or you can
Speaker 3: give it to your children, but we are no longer
Speaker 3: saying that you should necessarily. It's pretty weak, but still
Speaker 3: a step in the right direction.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And it's important to appreciate all steps in the
Speaker 2: right direction, even if they're small and muted and disappointing,
Speaker 2: also betweeting examples of the historical corruption at a SIP
Speaker 2: to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary.
Speaker 2: This is up from eleven shots in nineteen eighty six,
Speaker 2: That is, the sixty nine to ninety two routine, up
Speaker 2: from eleven. Many vaccine promoters have challenged this assertion they
Speaker 2: are always wrong. Last week, CNN, which has devoted devolved
Speaker 2: into a shameless propagandist for big pharma, devolved when were
Speaker 2: they not? When were they not? That certainly not in
Speaker 2: my lifetime? Triumphantly announced that it had proof that my
Speaker 2: pronouncement that there have been no placebo controlled safety trials
Speaker 2: for any routine vaccines was false. CNN gleefully proclaimed that
Speaker 2: it found two hundred fifty seven placebo controlled studies for
Speaker 2: routine vaccines. So allow me a moment to deconstruct CNN's claims. Warning,
Speaker 2: this post may only be sufferable for science geeks like myself.
Speaker 2: That's right. It's going to be a little bit dry,
Speaker 2: but he has a lot of information in here. It's
Speaker 2: worth going through it. It's important to go through things
Speaker 2: like this. CNN is wrong, no routine injected vaccine on
Speaker 2: CDC's schedule was licensed for children based on a placebo
Speaker 2: controlled trial and instances for where a vaccine was used
Speaker 2: as a control. It too, was never licensed based on
Speaker 2: a placebo controlled trial. That is not conjecture, it is
Speaker 2: a fact based on FDA's clinical trial data. As Secretary
Speaker 2: of ha HS GOV acknowledging this lamentable truth as part
Speaker 2: of my promise of radical transparency. At two hundred fifty
Speaker 2: seven studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the lack of
Speaker 2: safety trials underpinning CDC's schedule, despite CNN's worldwide effort to
Speaker 2: crowdsource trials with a placebo control per at us underscore
Speaker 2: FDA and at CDC GOV. An inert substance in this list,
Speaker 2: on its face, reflects that two hundred thirty six of
Speaker 2: the studies clearly did not use an inert safety comparator
Speaker 2: and a trial to license an injected routine vaccine for
Speaker 2: children on CDC schedule. Remaining twenty one studies CNN's list
Speaker 2: claims used an inert injection. Nine plainly did not. RCT
Speaker 2: two fifty one two fifty two Veravas injected an antibiotic
Speaker 2: neomyosin not inert RCT eighty four, ninety seven HPV sixteen
Speaker 2: and sixteen SLASH eighteen injected aluminum adjuvant not inert. RCTT
Speaker 2: fifteen almivas injected at another vaccine not inert. RCT fifty
Speaker 2: five lipophilized pedbax hib injected lactose, aluminum, agemant and thimerosol
Speaker 2: not inert. Thymyrosol of course being mercury RCT one ninety
Speaker 2: seven SALK vaccine injected one hundred nine injected one ninety
Speaker 2: nine solution, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenol, red antibiotics and
Speaker 2: formalin not inert. RCT one sixty eight dows MMR injected
Speaker 2: full vaccine minus virus, including all stabilizers, antibiotics, dilutant, preservative
Speaker 2: and buffers not inert. RCT one eighty nine menvivo menveo
Speaker 2: injected t DAP plus saline or menveo plus saline not
Speaker 2: inert for the mating. Twelve listed studies which may have
Speaker 2: had inert and inert injection. None was a trial relied
Speaker 2: upon to license a routine vaccine on CDC's Childhood schedule.
Speaker 2: RCT one seventy one seventy one one seventy two MMR,
Speaker 2: vax Pro two twenty eight, PCV eleven, one thirty six
Speaker 2: VAC ZIGRIP two forty two Anti tetanus, and one twenty
Speaker 2: two Chinese flu shots trial vaccines never licensed in the
Speaker 2: US nor relied upon to license a US vaccine. RCT
Speaker 2: one twenty four flu Zone IIV three one O two
Speaker 2: WVV slush SPV, and one eight eight men Bibo trials
Speaker 2: occurred after each respective vaccine was licensed, hence were not
Speaker 2: relied upon for their licensure. RCT one seventy six MUMPS
Speaker 2: vaccine was not relied upon by the FDA two license
Speaker 2: the current MMR vaccine see m m R two clinical
Speaker 2: trial report and link above. RCT fifty three PRP dash
Speaker 2: D was for a vaccine withdrawn soon after its introduction,
Speaker 2: not relied upon by the FDA two license. Any US
Speaker 2: vaccine would have guessed that CNN is lying. We're at
Speaker 2: minimum doing terrible research, just confirming their own bias. That's
Speaker 2: assuming they actually believe this and aren't just shamelessly shilling
Speaker 2: for pharma despite knowing these things. I would assume they're liars.
Speaker 2: I think we've got enough evidence to make that call.
Speaker 2: Got more comments Owen sixty one. I'm done with boosters.
Speaker 2: I've a continual vaccine intravenus strip. I swear it's better
Speaker 2: than methylene blue. Oh Man, Owen's got the future tech.
Speaker 2: He's breaking new ground, he's figuring out the new meta.
Speaker 2: KWD sixty eight. I still see people with masks, usually
Speaker 2: seventy plus years old and scared. Yes, they did a
Speaker 2: lot to scare the older generation. They made them very
Speaker 2: fearful of the fact that just seeing their family, their grandchildren,
Speaker 2: could kill them. I remember those heartbreaking videos of people
Speaker 2: just waving to each other, two family members through the windows,
Speaker 2: just and that was all that they could do. That's
Speaker 2: all they would do because they were so scared. It
Speaker 2: was a horrible time. KWD sixty eight. Again, protesters are
Speaker 2: wearing masks. They are safe. That's right. They're wearing masks.
Speaker 2: They've got the cloth coverings on, and they are safe.
Speaker 2: It is proven effective. They have nothing to fear from COVID.
Speaker 2: Do not obey Convid's nineteen still considered an emergency authorized
Speaker 2: experiment on the population. That's right, they still have it ongoing.
Speaker 2: They haven't taken that back. They've got no reason to.
Speaker 2: It gives them a lot of power, and they like that.
Speaker 2: Getting the government to relinquish relinquish power is always a
Speaker 2: dubious proposition at best. Sprumford, as far as I know,
Speaker 2: they've never done a vax versus unbaxed published study, probably
Speaker 2: because if they did, they'd reveal that unvaxed kids are
Speaker 2: more healthy. And as we can see that with the Amish,
Speaker 2: they don't get any vaccines and they routinely have extremely
Speaker 2: healthy children that don't suffer with the kinds of chronic
Speaker 2: issues that vaxed kids do. Bryan and de McCartney, The
Speaker 2: white Coats are coming. The White Coats are coming. Yes,
Speaker 2: more fearful than the British ever were. The British were
Speaker 2: at least going to try to have a stand up
Speaker 2: fight with you. They were at least somewhat honest about it.
Speaker 2: I'm like, yeah, we're coming for your guns. You're going
Speaker 2: to turn them over. The white Coats come in and
Speaker 2: they lie to you. Oh no, we're the experts. We're
Speaker 2: doing this for your own personal good. It's for your safety,
Speaker 2: it's for grandma's safety. We promise this isn't poison. We
Speaker 2: promise this isn't going to permanently damage your DNA. Sprumford.
Speaker 2: That is very generous. Thank you so much. We really
Speaker 2: appreciate it so kind of you. God bless the Night family.
Speaker 2: He does every single day he does. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Now they're coming from Sprumford. I'm sure they're coming with
Speaker 2: mRNA flu shots in the near future. Oh that's the plan.
Speaker 2: They're going to make everything an mRNA shot. They're going
Speaker 2: to warp and corrupt DNA as much as they can. Well,
Speaker 2: these twelve studies are not relied upon to license of
Speaker 2: routine vaccine on the CDC schedule. They do reflect that
Speaker 2: a placebo controlled trial of a vaccine is possible. Also
Speaker 2: reflect that what can be learned when a placebo trial
Speaker 2: is performed. For example, RCT one thirty six found the
Speaker 2: vaccine is ineffective, RCT one twenty two found that severe
Speaker 2: adverse effects occurred in sixty nine recipients of vaccine compared
Speaker 2: with one recipient of placebo, and RCT one twenty four
Speaker 2: found the rate of hospitalization was actually higher in the
Speaker 2: flu Zone IIV three vaccine group than in the placebo group.
Speaker 2: And that's why they don't want to do them, because
Speaker 2: it continually shows they're at best useless and at worst
Speaker 2: extremely harmful. It is a it's continually amazing to me
Speaker 2: how effective the propaganda has been. That people refuse to
Speaker 2: make correlations when it comes to vaccines. They don't want
Speaker 2: to see it. And I assume some of it is
Speaker 2: because some people have the guilt of worrying that they're
Speaker 2: the ones that cause these issues their children suffer with
Speaker 2: daily that they don't want to admit to themselves that
Speaker 2: the vaccines harmed their child, that they could have prevented
Speaker 2: it if they had simply said no, if they'd done
Speaker 2: a little bit more research. It's incredibly sad, like that
Speaker 2: video of that poor woman who found out that there
Speaker 2: was research linking SIDS to vaccination, and she broke down
Speaker 2: talking about how she thinks she killed her own child
Speaker 2: by getting them vaccinated. It's incredibly sad. It's a makes
Speaker 2: you wonder how many more stories there are like that.
Speaker 2: The unfortunate reality is that placebo controlled trials, however, do
Speaker 2: not occur and have not been relied upon. When FDA
Speaker 2: licenses vaccines for injection during childhood, or a SIP recommends
Speaker 2: the shot for addition to the CDC's routine schedule. SINN
Speaker 2: would have reached the same conclusion had it reviewed the
Speaker 2: FDA documentation for each vaccine instead of relying upon a
Speaker 2: random crowd source line from the internet. CNN's list ironically
Speaker 2: proves the lack of adequate safety trials for routine childhood vaccines.
Speaker 2: That's right, It proves the opposite of what they thought
Speaker 2: it would. These are the experts that want to dole
Speaker 2: out the news to us, dole out the information. They
Speaker 2: are the voice from on high and we must listen
Speaker 2: to them. But they can't even do their own research correctly.
Speaker 2: They crowdsource the list from the internet, are incapable of
Speaker 2: interpreting the data and seeing what it actually says. Are
Speaker 2: mocking bird media at work here, Isn't it wonderful?
Speaker 3: It seems like a AI type thing where they got
Speaker 3: a list of stuff and then just went ahead with it.
Speaker 3: Though that's probably more malicious than that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, as I said, at best, it proves they're idiots
Speaker 2: that can't research, But more than likely they just don't care,
Speaker 2: and they know that the people who watch their newsfeed
Speaker 2: aren't going to do the research either. They're just going
Speaker 2: to take it at face value. They're going to accept it,
Speaker 2: internalize it, and never question it because the person on
Speaker 2: the TV told them to, and the person on the
Speaker 2: TV shares their beliefs and is therefore good and righteous
Speaker 2: and to be trusted at all times no matter what.
Speaker 2: It's time to stop playing games such as CNN's false Gatcha.
Speaker 2: We have gone from three routine injections by age one
Speaker 2: in nineteen eighty six nineteen eighty six, the year the
Speaker 2: National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, to twenty five routine injections
Speaker 2: by age one in twenty twenty five, which now does
Speaker 2: not include COVID nineteen vaccines. Because the nineteen eighty six Act,
Speaker 2: every one of these products save one, was developed by
Speaker 2: companies knowing they would almost never be liable for serious harm.
Speaker 2: During the same period, chronic diseases in our children exploded,
Speaker 2: most of which are caused by immune system dysregulation. We
Speaker 2: are to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic
Speaker 2: of autoimmune diseases. We need to rule out products given
Speaker 2: dozens of times to young children, specifically to modify the
Speaker 2: immune system, as potential culprits are invincent. Children deserve the
Speaker 2: best safety trials possible to keep them safe. We should
Speaker 2: care as much about every child who could be injured
Speaker 2: by one of these products as we do every child
Speaker 2: it could be injured by an infectious disease. We must
Speaker 2: protect all children. While that is true, we need to
Speaker 2: protect our children, we need to cherish them, not in
Speaker 2: this fake way of fear fear mongering where they tell
Speaker 2: us you have to get this, you need to That's
Speaker 2: what we need to do is protect our kids from
Speaker 2: the vaccines, from government that is going to inject them
Speaker 2: with poison. This is another article from Children's Health Defense,
Speaker 2: Part two Why RFK Junior's call for placebo controlled vaccine
Speaker 2: trials is justified and worth expanding. A double blind, placebo
Speaker 2: controlled trial is considered the gold standard for clinical trials
Speaker 2: because it has the best chance of determining whether an
Speaker 2: active treatment is effective. So wire critics assailing HHS Secretary
Speaker 2: Robert F. Kennedy's call for such trials before any vaccines
Speaker 2: are approved.
Speaker 5: This is.
Speaker 2: Trying to no thought. I Editor's note. This article is
Speaker 2: part two in a series exploring vaccine clinical trials. Read
Speaker 2: part one here. As Edward H. Cuss, Harvard physician and
Speaker 2: founding member and first president of the Infectious Disease Society
Speaker 2: of America stated in nineteen seventy one in an article
Speaker 2: published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, we had accepted
Speaker 2: some half truths and it stopped searching for the whole truth.
Speaker 2: The principal half truths were that medical research had stamped
Speaker 2: out the great killers of the past tuberculosis, dip theory
Speaker 2: and pneumonia, per per peril, sepsis, etc. And that medical
Speaker 2: research and our superior system of medical care were major
Speaker 2: factors in extending life expectancy. The data on death from
Speaker 2: tuberculosis show that the mortality rate from the disease has
Speaker 2: been declining steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century,
Speaker 2: has continued to decline in almost linear fashion during the
Speaker 2: past one hundred years till nineteen seventy. That's right. We've
Speaker 2: all seen these charts, at least I'm assuming everyone in
Speaker 2: our audience has. Shows that vaccines were introduced after a
Speaker 2: sharp decline had already taken place, and the trend didn't
Speaker 2: seem to accelerate after the vaccines were introduced. It stayed
Speaker 2: fairly regular. Got a comment, don't frag me bro mRNA
Speaker 2: for flu is pass a. Soon'll be the mRNA, cancer
Speaker 2: jab cure. That's right. It's going to be mRNA all day,
Speaker 2: every day for whatever ails. You can't get enough mRNA
Speaker 2: into your system. There were increases in rates of tuberculosis
Speaker 2: during wars and underspecified adverse local conditions. The four in
Speaker 2: the crowd had always came off worst of all in
Speaker 2: war and in peace. But the open for all decline
Speaker 2: and deaths from tuberculosis was not altered measurably by the
Speaker 2: discovery of the tuberculosis bacillis Bachilus bacillis, the advent of
Speaker 2: the tuberculin test, the appearance of BCG vaccination, the widespread
Speaker 2: use of mass screening, the intensive anti tuberculosis campaigns, or
Speaker 2: discovery of streptomycin. It is important that this point be
Speaker 2: understood in its completeness the what was made years ago
Speaker 2: by Wade Hampton Frost and more recently by Renee Dubois.
Speaker 2: It has been repeatedly stressed through the years by many
Speaker 2: observers of the public health. Similar trends mortality had been
Speaker 2: reported with respects to diphtheria, scarlet fever, rheumatic fever, pertussis, measles,
Speaker 2: and many others. That's right, all these diseases took a
Speaker 2: sharp decline when sanitation became more common more ubiquitous. Anthony R. Mausen,
Speaker 2: Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics oh NO Statistics, took the
Speaker 2: same line in twenty eighteen when he stated, it is
Speaker 2: well known that deaths from common infectious diseases declinedmatically before
Speaker 2: the advent of most vaccines, due to improved environmental conditions
Speaker 2: given diseases for even diseases for which there were no vaccines.
Speaker 2: In this context, we would also like to briefly refute
Speaker 2: Jess Steiner's assertion that Sulk's polio vaccine made cases dropping
Speaker 2: from fifty eight thousand in nineteen fifty seventy one sixty
Speaker 2: one in nineteen sixty one. And can see that graph here.
Speaker 2: You can see where the vaccines are introduced, the drop
Speaker 2: had already been precipitous, had already gone down massively, and
Speaker 2: the vaccines didn't really coincide with a massive any more
Speaker 2: massive drop than already was. It was already on a
Speaker 2: downward trend from nineteen twenty three to nineteen fifty three,
Speaker 2: long before at large scale polio vaccinations began to be
Speaker 2: carried out. In the mid nineteen fifties, mortalities attributed polio
Speaker 2: had already decreased substantially in the USA by forty seven percent,
Speaker 2: in Great Britain by fifty five percent. In other European countries,
Speaker 2: the statistics are comparable. This diagram was reproduced with permission
Speaker 2: from the following book Vaccines, Are They Really Safe? And Effective?
Speaker 2: By neil Z Miller. Of course, an important thing to
Speaker 2: also consider about these graphs this is just when the
Speaker 2: vaccines were introduced. It doesn't give us any kind of
Speaker 2: data that really shows how many people took the vaccine.
Speaker 2: They might claim that it was a huge contributor, but
Speaker 2: we can see from the graph that was already going
Speaker 2: down and we have at least this article doesn't cover
Speaker 2: how many people were vaccinated, so we don't know if
Speaker 2: they even reached their fabled herd immunity. On the one hand,
Speaker 2: this does not invalidate the data presented to Miller's graph
Speaker 2: see above, showing that sALS polio vaccine has nothing to
Speaker 2: do with the containment of polio their hand. It is
Speaker 2: also important to bear in mind that the standards for
Speaker 2: defining polio were changed in nineteen fifty five, causing the
Speaker 2: number of polio diagnoses to drop noticeably. According to the
Speaker 2: scientific journalist Neil Miller, the new definition of a polio
Speaker 2: epidemic required more cases to be reported. Paralytic polio was
Speaker 2: redefined as well, making it more difficult to confirm and
Speaker 2: tally cases. Prior, the patient only had to exhibit paralytic
Speaker 2: symptoms for twenty four hours. Laboratory confirmation and tests to
Speaker 2: determine residual prolonged paralysis were not required. The new definition
Speaker 2: required the patients to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least
Speaker 2: sixty days. In residual paralysis had to be confirmed twice
Speaker 2: during the course of the disease. Also from the non
Speaker 2: cases of aseptic meningitis and cocsacchi virus infections reported as
Speaker 2: separate diseases from polio, but such cases were counted as
Speaker 2: polio before. In nineteen seventy six, doctor Jonas Salk, creator
Speaker 2: of the killed virus vaccine used in the nineteen fifties,
Speaker 2: testified that the lie virus vaccine, used almost exclusively in
Speaker 2: the United States from the early nineteen sixties to two thousand,
Speaker 2: was the principle, if not sole, cause, of all reported
Speaker 2: polio cases in the US since nineteen sixty one. There
Speaker 2: are many indications that not only are vaccines to blame,
Speaker 2: but especially toxins such as DDT see the diagram below
Speaker 2: and the Philippines. Only a few years before the Salk
Speaker 2: vaccine disaster in the US, the first polyopademic in the
Speaker 2: tropics occurred spontaneously. In fact, with the introduction of the
Speaker 2: insecticide d d T. There another poison they introduced into
Speaker 2: the environment and cause all kinds of terrible chronic issues
Speaker 2: for people who could have seen that coming. Around the
Speaker 2: end of World War II, US troops and the Philippines
Speaker 2: had sprayed masses of DDT daily to wipe out flies.
Speaker 2: Just two years later, the well known journal of the
Speaker 2: American Medical Association reported that lameness among soldier station the
Speaker 2: Philippines cannot be differentiated from polio, and it had advanced
Speaker 2: to become the second most common cause of death. Only
Speaker 2: combat exercises were said to have claimed more victims. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: populations in neighboring areas or the poisonek had not been
Speaker 2: sprayed experienced no problems with paralysis. This is another one
Speaker 2: of those times where somebody in a lab coat or
Speaker 2: somebody on Twitter with a PhD is going to come
Speaker 2: to you and say, well, correlation doesn't equal causation and
Speaker 2: expect you to just wipe it away. Oh well, in
Speaker 2: that case, I suppose I should just ignore it. Correlation
Speaker 2: does not equal causation is not supposed to be a
Speaker 2: thought terminating cliche. It's supposed to be an admonition to
Speaker 2: check your facts, to do more research, to look into
Speaker 2: things more closely. But it is just a thought terminating cliche.
Speaker 2: Now someone says it, and that's supposed to make you go, oh, well,
Speaker 2: then I guess I don't need to think about this anymore.
Speaker 2: I look at statistics shows that the polio epidemic in
Speaker 2: the United States of America reached its peak in nineteen
Speaker 2: fifty two, from then on rapidly declined. We have seen
Speaker 2: that this cannot be explained by the sulk inoculation, since
Speaker 2: this was first introduced in nineteen fifty five. There is
Speaker 2: a most striking parallel between the polio development and the
Speaker 2: utilization with severe neurotoksin DDT and other highly toxic pesticides.
Speaker 2: The approval trial of the cervical cancer HPV vaccine Gardasil
Speaker 2: is also cited by the Public Health scientist doctor Jesse
Speaker 2: Styre as a successful example of a placebo study. In
Speaker 2: this study, no placebo in the form of a saline
Speaker 2: solution was taken, but an active comparator riddled with aluminium
Speaker 2: was used as context. It is being claimed also by Styer,
Speaker 2: for example, that the agumant system was already proven safe
Speaker 2: and necessary for the vaccine to work. This is how
Speaker 2: they lie. This is how they cover up the damage
Speaker 2: by using an equally toxic thing as a comparator. Well,
Speaker 2: you know it's no more damaging than this other poison
Speaker 2: that we're shoving into people. Oh well, in that case,
Speaker 2: feel free. I mean, if it's no more damaging than
Speaker 2: the other toxins, who am I to object? But the
Speaker 2: opposite is true. Gardasil, which was designed to prevent cervical
Speaker 2: cancer and genital wartz and sexually active women, has not
Speaker 2: been proven safe and effective in clinical trials. In fact,
Speaker 2: the vaccine triggered adverse event reports in ninety percent of
Speaker 2: the test subjects within fifteen days, hardly an indication of safety.
Speaker 2: Over the controversial lunarm containing placebo formula triggered eighty five
Speaker 2: percent of the adda verse event reports. This raises reasonable
Speaker 2: concerns about accurately distinguishing vaccine induced side effects from those
Speaker 2: caused by the adjuvent without untreated null group, genuine safety
Speaker 2: profiles remain elusive. More of the US Food and Drug
Speaker 2: Administration doesn't know what long term adverse effects that the
Speaker 2: vaccine might produce. In fact, Gardasil comes along with heavy
Speaker 2: side effects ranging from reddening and swelling around the injection sites, fever, hives, arthritis,
Speaker 2: and even death. Apart from that, according to the twenty
Speaker 2: eighteen Cochrane View on HPV vaccines, which channelized data from
Speaker 2: over seventy three thousand participants in twenty six studies, vaccination
Speaker 2: did not reduce rates of invasive cervical cancer overall mortality.
Speaker 2: It only showed reductions in surrogate markers, specifically cervical intrapethlial
Speaker 2: neoplasia SIN two plus and SIN three plus, which may
Speaker 2: regress spontaneously and are not equivalent to cancer. The so
Speaker 2: called precancerous lesions are often detected through invasive screening and
Speaker 2: lack proven clinical relevance. As such, the claimed for an
Speaker 2: effect on cervical cancer remains absolutely speculative. But they made
Speaker 2: a lot of money on it, and that's what counts.
Speaker 2: The money wasn't speculative, it was guaranteed. And that's not all.
Speaker 2: Recently published expert report by doctor Peter C. Gutsch, Danish
Speaker 2: medical researcher and co founder of the Cochrane Collaboration keuses
Speaker 2: Guard cell maker Merk in connection with a US lawsuit
Speaker 2: of false fining guard soil trial data, concealing serious side
Speaker 2: effects and deceiving the regulatory authorities. They wouldn't do that.
Speaker 2: Big Pharma cares about us. They love us. That's why
Speaker 2: they spend so much money on propaganda on the news
Speaker 2: outlet stations, whether it's Fox or CNN or CBS or
Speaker 2: wherever you turn it on and you get bombarded with them.
Speaker 2: It's because they love us, because they want to keep
Speaker 2: us safe and healthy. The COVID nineteen vaccines, about which
Speaker 2: even Stefan Oulick, member of the board of Management A
Speaker 2: Bayer Ag stated that it is not a classical vaccine,
Speaker 2: the so called MR the injections penetrate cells and only
Speaker 2: cause certain cells to produce any bodies, are also being
Speaker 2: named as positive examples of placebo controlled studies. Whoever, these
Speaker 2: studies have several fundamental shortcomings. COVID nineteen trials were only
Speaker 2: observer blinded, meaning health care providers administering the vaccines knew
Speaker 2: who received the vaccine and who receive placebo, introducing potential
Speaker 2: biases into data collection and interpretation. Additionally, the blinding within
Speaker 2: these studies was lifted after approximately two months, transisting participants
Speaker 2: into an open label phase, further limiting the ability to
Speaker 2: assess long term efficacy and safety due to potential bias.
Speaker 2: Noteworthy in this context is the forensic analysis of the
Speaker 2: thirty eight subject deaths in the six month interim report
Speaker 2: of the Peiser bio Ntech b NT one six two
Speaker 2: B two mRNA vaccine clinical trial, compiled by the Daily
Speaker 2: Clout Feiser Biointech Documents Investigations Team. The analysis states the
Speaker 2: analysis report here is unique. It is the first study
Speaker 2: of the original data from the Pfizer Biointech bn T
Speaker 2: one six two B two mRNA vaccine clinical trial C
Speaker 2: four five nine one zero zero one to be carried
Speaker 2: out by a group unaffiliated with a trial sponsor. Well,
Speaker 2: I mean, why would you ever let someone that's unaffiliated
Speaker 2: look at your data. You can't have unbiased eyes on
Speaker 2: that they might find something that you don't like. Key
Speaker 2: findings include that the thirty eight of the thirty eight
Speaker 2: deaths reported in the six month Interim Adverse Event Report,
Speaker 2: twenty one subjects were vaccinated with the Pfizer Biointech bn
Speaker 2: T one six two B two injection diet compared to
Speaker 2: seventeen placebo subjects. Number of cardiac events was a three
Speaker 2: point sevenfold higher and subject who received v b n
Speaker 2: T one six two B two vaccine compared to placebo. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: it is remarkable that people like Steiner failed to mention
Speaker 2: crucial placebo studies showing that the vaccines came off badly.
Speaker 2: One of the most famous examples of this is a
Speaker 2: large scale field trial that the who implemented it India
Speaker 2: at the end of the nineteenh sixties on the BCG
Speaker 2: vaccine for tuberculosis. His trial large collective was vaccinated with
Speaker 2: BCG while equally large and remain unvaccinated. The results not
Speaker 2: only did the vaccination show no protective effects against tuberculosis,
Speaker 2: but significantly more participants fell ill and died in the
Speaker 2: vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. I wonder why
Speaker 2: they don't want to do these studies. I wonder why
Speaker 2: they don't want to know for sure. I mean couldn't
Speaker 2: be because it would lead to the slaughtering of their
Speaker 2: sacred cash cow. Right, they wouldn't do that. They wouldn't
Speaker 2: experiment and poison the American people just for money. Well
Speaker 2: they would, But it's not just for money, is it.
Speaker 2: It's because they love death. They love the idea of
Speaker 2: culling the population down to what they consider a manageable level.
Speaker 2: They want to get rid of as many of us
Speaker 2: as they can. Got comments Milutan. Milankovic is a monthly
Speaker 2: supporter and gifted three subs on Oh thank you, Malutan.
Speaker 2: I really appreciate that.
Speaker 1: That is very of you.
Speaker 2: It is because of support from people like you that
Speaker 2: were able to keep the show going. Thank you so much,
Speaker 2: Yowna Anni Wodie. We need a new shot to treat
Speaker 2: all the side effects from the last shot. That's right.
Speaker 2: We need more shots. And once you've had your shots,
Speaker 2: you can go at the bar and get some more
Speaker 2: shots so you can drink away the pain and the
Speaker 2: knowledge of what you've done to yourself.
Speaker 7: He kill us.
Speaker 2: When I met my wife, she would get the flu
Speaker 2: shot every year, and she would get sick every year.
Speaker 2: And after I met her, I told her to stop
Speaker 2: taking it. She hasn't gotten sick since in eight years.
Speaker 2: That seems to be the common consensus. Most people only
Speaker 2: seem to get the flu when they get the flu
Speaker 2: shot a Syrian girl. Correlation doesn't guarantee causation, but it implies.
Speaker 2: It used to be called common sense when you paid
Speaker 2: attention to it, but did your own research. Yeah, it
Speaker 2: doesn't necessarily guarantee causation, but as you said, it implies it.
Speaker 2: It says, HM, you should look deeper. There's possibly something here.
Speaker 2: Common sense shows that there probably is, but you can't
Speaker 2: always trust it. Sometimes things aren't what they seem. In
Speaker 2: this trial, a large collection was vaccinated with BCG. Another
Speaker 2: example of a properly controlled trial stems from twenty twelve,
Speaker 2: in which an influenza vaccine was compared with a true
Speaker 2: placebo and children. The result was devastating. Despite the authors
Speaker 2: trying to support influenza vaccination, they admitted there was no
Speaker 2: statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza
Speaker 2: infection between the groups, even whist the vaccine group had
Speaker 2: higher risk of acute respiratory illness with non influenza actions infections.
Speaker 2: Against this background, The question arises why the Trump government
Speaker 2: indicated its plan to make glacebo trials for every new
Speaker 2: study compulsory. Wouldn't apply to the flu vaccine, which is
Speaker 2: updated year to year, which according to the HIHS HHS,
Speaker 2: has been tried and tested for more than eighty years.
Speaker 2: It has been tried and found wanting, It has been
Speaker 2: tried and found harmful, but it has also been tried
Speaker 2: and found extremely profitable, extremely lucrative. There's a lot of
Speaker 2: money in poison. Flu vaccines are manufactured before the claimed
Speaker 2: viruses they're supposed to work against even exist, And is
Speaker 2: if that weren't enough on close examination of flu data
Speaker 2: on which the warnings of the epidemic hunters from the
Speaker 2: CDC RKR, who are based the question crops up or
Speaker 2: used flu death figures more pr than science. That's right.
Speaker 2: They create these vaccines before they even know what the
Speaker 2: flu was going to be like that year. They're just
Speaker 2: out there guessing. It reminds me if you've ever seen
Speaker 2: Robin Hood men in tights. There's a blind character and
Speaker 2: he gets put on lookout. Robin shows back up and says,
Speaker 2: what are you doing? And he says, I'm guessing. I
Speaker 2: guess there's nobody coming. I guess there's nobody attacking us.
Speaker 2: We've got the blind out here creating our vaccines for us.
Speaker 2: This is precisely the title of a study published in
Speaker 2: two thousand and five in the British Medical Journal. The author,
Speaker 2: Peter Doshi, PhD, Associate Professor at the University of Maryland
Speaker 2: School Pharmacy and senior editor at the BMJ, provide a
Speaker 2: resoundingly decisive answer, US data on influenza deaths are a mess,
Speaker 2: Doshi Maine. Dosh's main criticism is that the CDC works
Speaker 2: under the assumption that thirty six thousand Americans die from
Speaker 2: viral flu each year, but they still owe us proof
Speaker 2: that an influenza virus really kills these people do. She's conclusion,
Speaker 2: the CDC's communication strategy is equivalent to marketing of fear.
Speaker 2: Several astute observers critique to the government's promotional campaign urging
Speaker 2: the public to vaccinate against the flu by challenging the
Speaker 2: thirty six thousand annual death count the CDC attributes to
Speaker 2: the flu. Especially worth mentioning is the meta analysis of
Speaker 2: the published flu vaccine reports by Tom Jefferson and Cochrane
Speaker 2: Center The findings of these two thousand and six articles
Speaker 2: are sobering. Major gap exists between evidence and public health policy. Yes, well,
Speaker 2: this is a long and in depth article. We've covered
Speaker 2: a little right around half of it. We're gonna move
Speaker 2: on to the next one. This one is so when
Speaker 2: it was very sad. We'll talk about it briefly and
Speaker 2: then we'll take a quick break. White fibrous clots found
Speaker 2: in three year old child born to mother who was
Speaker 2: COVID vaccinated while pregnant. We saw these clots being found
Speaker 2: fairly rapidly after the COVID vaccines rolled out. People who
Speaker 2: worked in morgues were pulling them out of people and saying,
Speaker 2: I've never seen anything like this. Don't know what is
Speaker 2: causing this, what could be the cause of these things,
Speaker 2: What's changed in the environment, What has been done that
Speaker 2: could be causing this. Well, we know one major thing
Speaker 2: that changed people got injected with an mRNA vaccine. Is
Speaker 2: by Rhoda Wilson. It's on the EXPOSA examination of a
Speaker 2: three year old child's blood reveals the alarming discovery of
Speaker 2: fibrous clots in the blood of young children born to
Speaker 2: mothers who received COVID mRNA vaccines during pregnancy. Also provisionally
Speaker 2: accepted paper shows that COVID vaccinated women receiving IVF treatment
Speaker 2: are less likely to have a live birth compared to
Speaker 2: unvaccinated women. With possibly the exception of the USA, health experts,
Speaker 2: quote medical organizations, and corporate media around the world continue
Speaker 2: to assert that COVID vaccines are safe for pregnant women
Speaker 2: and their un foreign children. That's right. They don't care.
Speaker 2: They don't care what it does to kids. They don't
Speaker 2: care what it does to women. They don't care what
Speaker 2: it does to your ability to have children. It makes
Speaker 2: them a lot of money. Doctor Kevin ccairn is a
Speaker 2: systems neuroscientists who has been researching the effects of the
Speaker 2: SARS cove two spike protein and its potential cause and
Speaker 2: its potential to cause pry On like conditions and April
Speaker 2: Health Alliance Australia hosted a webinar where doctor mccairn detailed
Speaker 2: his ongoing research and simplications for public health. He discussed
Speaker 2: the presence of emily emyloid ogenic peptides. Peptides are the
Speaker 2: building blocks of proteins and pri on like particles and
Speaker 2: blood clots associated with the SARS cove two spike protein
Speaker 2: biowepon found in the virus and the covid vaccines. Doctor
Speaker 2: mccairn's analysis of the usual fibrous white clots retrieved from
Speaker 2: the deceased show them to be the diseased protein aceous
Speaker 2: tissue primarily misfolded fibrine that is highly emloidgenic embloidogenic. His
Speaker 2: research indicates a potential global health crisis due to these
Speaker 2: misfolded proteins causing multi organ dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cancer, heart disease
Speaker 2: and other health issues. And percent of blood samples and
Speaker 2: to doctor mccairn contain these embloidogenic peptides. He warned that
Speaker 2: these prions remain active even months after removal from the body,
Speaker 2: raising significant concerns about blood transfusions and other medical procedures.
Speaker 2: South Alliance Australis gene Rose and Androwartha said we have
Speaker 2: a global amloidogenic health crisis. These amloidogenic prion triggering epatopes
Speaker 2: part of an antigen eliciting an immune response to an
Speaker 2: invading pathogen. Peptides are also seated in the environment as
Speaker 2: well as in living organisms. They are highly resistant with
Speaker 2: the potential to cause multi organ dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cancer, heart disease,
Speaker 2: sudden death, strokes, et cetera. That's right, and they're now
Speaker 2: showing up apparently in the children of women who got
Speaker 2: vaccinated with a COVID vaccine while they were pregnant. It's
Speaker 2: not just affecting the people it was injected directly into.
Speaker 2: It's altering things down the line. That's what we were
Speaker 2: all very concerned about. I know I was. I'm sure
Speaker 2: all of you weres too. There's no guarantee that it
Speaker 2: was going to stop, that it wouldn't impact the children,
Speaker 2: even if they weren't born yet. As I said, we're
Speaker 2: going to take a quick break now, we will come
Speaker 2: back and we'll talk about how the FDA approved hundreds
Speaker 2: of drugs with no evidence they work briefly. That's right.
Speaker 2: They're free to do anything before we go, DGA, thank you,
Speaker 2: that is very kind. Appreciate the tip. The Trump administration.
Speaker 2: FDA had just approved lab drown pink salmon, and people
Speaker 2: still trust this government. One of the main ingredients is
Speaker 2: not being disclosed reminiscent of soilent green soilent pink this time,
Speaker 2: I suppose mister pink Well. Briefly, again, i'd like to
Speaker 2: remind you if you'd like to support the show, there
Speaker 2: are many ways to do it. A lot of them
Speaker 2: are listed on the website. There's zell Cash, app, crypto,
Speaker 2: and you can also purchase products there. This coin that
Speaker 2: Jason Barker put together, the microphone on one side, a
Speaker 2: chess piece on the other. It looks fantastic. I really
Speaker 2: like it. I think you would like it too. There's
Speaker 2: hoodies and shirts and all kinds of different things there.
Speaker 2: There's David Knight dot Gold that Tony Ardburn has set
Speaker 2: up if you want to get outside the Fiat monetary system.
Speaker 2: He has set up Wolfpack where he will if you subscribe,
Speaker 2: he will send you gold or silver or gold and
Speaker 2: silver on a monthly basis. There's multiple tiers there. There's
Speaker 2: a Trends Journal where if you use promo code night
Speaker 2: you will get ten percent off the magnificent Trends Journal
Speaker 2: that drold slnty works very very hard on. And there
Speaker 2: is also of course RNC store dot com promo code
Speaker 2: Night for ten percent off there as well. To start
Speaker 2: taking control of your health, and of course our latest sponsor,
Speaker 2: Homestead Life. I still need the sheet. Homestead Like Products
Speaker 2: is a company tailored for those who do not wish
Speaker 2: to eat toxic garbage forced upon us at the big
Speaker 2: box stores. Their life goal is to reach other like
Speaker 2: minded people who care about where their food comes from
Speaker 2: and what is in it. Ninety percent of their products
Speaker 2: are handcrafted home cottage products and all natural or organic.
Speaker 2: Anyone who wants to spend their money with Americans that
Speaker 2: handcraft goods made with pride rather than Chinese sweat labor
Speaker 2: should check out Homestead Products dot shop and you can
Speaker 2: use promo code Night there as well for another ten
Speaker 2: percent off. And they have all kinds of different things.
Speaker 2: They even have seasonings. This is an all purpose seasoning
Speaker 2: blend looks very flavorful as onion, black pepper, garlic, salt,
Speaker 2: and cayenne pepper. And also here you have freeze dried
Speaker 2: organic ground beef. So if you're looking for some food
Speaker 2: that is not injected with all kinds of things and
Speaker 2: you want to make sure that it is high quality
Speaker 2: and doesn't have weird chemicals in it, Homestead Life Homestead
Speaker 2: Products dot shop and they are homestead Life Products. We
Speaker 2: will be right back, folks. Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 7: Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 6: Sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Speaker 6: Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
Speaker 6: sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 5: This is outrageous, Washington.
Speaker 7: I spent my life fighting centralized power. Now the Federal
Speaker 7: Reserve monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money. Tell
Speaker 7: me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 6: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 6: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the FED.
Speaker 6: Up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative Coin. Now
Speaker 6: patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
Speaker 6: a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 7: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 7: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks. I said, we were going to talk
Speaker 2: about the FDA, but I think everyone knows that they
Speaker 2: don't do any research in the drugs they approve. That's
Speaker 2: been confirmed now, but we already know it. So you
Speaker 2: can take that headline. I'll give you where it's from,
Speaker 2: and it is. The headline is FDA approved hundred of
Speaker 2: drugs with no evidence they work. It's from the Free
Speaker 2: Thought Project. If you want to share that around, that's
Speaker 2: where you can find it. But I think we'll move
Speaker 2: to some less serious topics. So we spent about an
Speaker 2: hour on big pharma, and that's about as much big
Speaker 2: varma as I can take. I'm going to start shedding
Speaker 2: the spike proteins myself if I talk about it anymore.
Speaker 2: This is a more humorous story. Kentucky man known as
Speaker 2: Cowboy Cody released raccoon into packed restaurant and misguided revenge plot.
Speaker 2: That's right, there is one true American left. He's out there.
Speaker 2: His name is Cowboy Cody, and he's wrangling raccoons and
Speaker 2: using them against his enemies, the Mast Bandit didn't come
Speaker 2: to steal, he came to bite, and Kentucky man known
Speaker 2: as Cowboy Cody let loose a terrified raccoon in a
Speaker 2: bar out of revenge for being turned away from the
Speaker 2: establishment Friday night. According to police and a bartender who
Speaker 2: witnessed the incident, dare they he looks quite pleased with
Speaker 2: himself in that photo. You can tell that he's the
Speaker 2: type of man that would use a raccoon as a weapon.
Speaker 2: I would be friends with this man. He seems like
Speaker 2: a lot of fun to be around, just so long
Speaker 2: as you don't mind potentially getting bit by a varmut.
Speaker 2: Police arrested Jonathan Mason, forty, on a slough of charges,
Speaker 2: including assault, after he released a raccoon into the Big
Speaker 2: Apple Grill and Bar in the city of Murray. According
Speaker 2: to a police press release, apparently, he had trapped a
Speaker 2: raccoon earlier in the day on his farm, and he
Speaker 2: had been carrying it around with him. That's right. He
Speaker 2: just kept it with him in case he needed it,
Speaker 2: in case he got turned away. I suppose he knew
Speaker 2: it would come in handy. A restaurant bartender, Mary After
Speaker 2: told the Post, I'm a bartender, so you know, I've
Speaker 2: seen some crazy stuff in my time, but nothing like this.
Speaker 3: I get a concealed carry raccoon.
Speaker 2: That's right. I don't I don't know if you need
Speaker 2: a permit to carry a raccoon, but apparently they're quite
Speaker 2: useful in a pinch. Mason, dubbed Cowboy Cody by locals,
Speaker 2: lives alone on a nearby farm and has caused trouble
Speaker 2: in the past at local bars. Employees told the Post, yes,
Speaker 2: he seems like the type that might be one to
Speaker 2: cause trouble just carrying around a raccoon in case of emergency. Halfner,
Speaker 2: thirty seven, who has worked at the Big Apple for
Speaker 2: five years, said Mason was already drinking when she encountered
Speaker 2: him Friday night. The bar had previously banned him over
Speaker 2: a drunken mule incident, which we'll talk about as well.
Speaker 2: Mason always liked her, Hafner said, and she thought she
Speaker 2: could convince him to leave without causing a scene. I
Speaker 2: think that flew out the door the moment he had
Speaker 2: that raccoon in his possession, he knew it would come
Speaker 2: in handy. I came out from around the bar and
Speaker 2: asked him nicely to leave, said Hafner. Said to me, oh,
Speaker 2: I see how it is. They sent her pretty face
Speaker 2: out here to distract me. Initially, Mason complied without complaint.
Speaker 2: At first, I was like, whew, I'd refused a big issue,
Speaker 2: she said. Moments later, he returned armed with a raccoon.
Speaker 2: That was right. It was a fully automatic assault raccoon too,
Speaker 2: so it was especially dangerous, she said. The raccoon waddled
Speaker 2: into the crowded restaurant as customers looked on in confusion.
Speaker 2: It was more scared than anything, she said. It was
Speaker 2: pretty upsetting for him, as I imagine. The raccoon had
Speaker 2: no clue what was going on. He had never encountered
Speaker 2: anyone like Cowboy Cody before, didn't know how to handle him.
Speaker 2: Afterner told her fellow employees to let her handle the raccoon,
Speaker 2: but another employee didn't listen and tried to snatch the
Speaker 2: furry fiend by his tail. It bit him, she said,
Speaker 2: and he had to go get the raby shots. Video
Speaker 2: shows the employee crawling on the floor, chasing after the
Speaker 2: raccoon as he weaves his way through tables and chairs.
Speaker 2: The raccoon then bites the worker on his hand as
Speaker 2: the wild animal makes a shrieking growl. But after I
Speaker 2: was able to lure the critter into it onto a chair,
Speaker 2: where she casually wraps him in a towel and heads
Speaker 2: for the exit. I'm no city slicker, Hafner said, I'm
Speaker 2: a Kentucky girl. I had no problem catching him. The
Speaker 2: worker who was bitten had to get raby shots. This
Speaker 2: is not the first time Mason was involved in an
Speaker 2: animal related crime. Last winter, Mason was arrested twice for
Speaker 2: leading cops on a wild, drunken chase through the city
Speaker 2: streets on a mule. Big Apple employees had to call
Speaker 2: the police on Mason when he allegedly beat the animal
Speaker 2: to whip in the parking lot. That's right, he was
Speaker 2: driving a mule under the influence. This man lives a
Speaker 2: interesting life. Mason led police on a drunken chase on
Speaker 2: the mule on the night of December seve seven, and
Speaker 2: then did it again on December ninth. According to police,
Speaker 2: he's incorrigible. He can't be contained. The police of this
Speaker 2: small town are no match for cowboy Cody and his
Speaker 2: animal antics. Mason refused to leave his car when officers
Speaker 2: pulled him over later that night after releasing the raccoon.
Speaker 2: Police said he also wouldn't roll down his window so
Speaker 2: that the officer could question him. According to the release,
Speaker 2: eventually cops placed him under arrest. Mason was booked into
Speaker 2: the Callawai County Jail and is facing charges of third
Speaker 2: degree criminal trespass, second degree assault, resisting arrests in failure
Speaker 2: to maintain insurance. There's no law that this man respects.
Speaker 2: A true American at heart.
Speaker 3: They threw in the sky wearing a mask who was
Speaker 3: real short and fury. It was terrifying.
Speaker 2: It was a hold up, that's right, But at least
Speaker 2: we know they don't have to worry about COVID because
Speaker 2: all raccoons come equipped with masks. Naturally, you're safe. You
Speaker 2: might get rabies, but not COVID from a raccoon, so
Speaker 2: you know nothing to worry about there. Yes, well, that
Speaker 2: that was our funny story of the day. I saw
Speaker 2: that yesterday and I thought it was one of the
Speaker 2: more entertaining things I've seen in a long time. If
Speaker 2: only I could have my own personal attack raccoon, I
Speaker 2: would use it for all kinds of nefarious purposes and
Speaker 2: have him steal snacks for me and all kinds of
Speaker 2: other things. Brian dev McCartney here, Kitty Kitty, Yes, that's me.
Speaker 2: I love all kinds of animals. I am the one
Speaker 2: in the family who is most likely to get bitten
Speaker 2: by something trying to make it my friend. I'm the
Speaker 2: one that had to remove a possum from our back
Speaker 2: porch in Texas. I also got tasked with moving some
Speaker 2: a snake around when we first moved here. Brion. This
Speaker 2: is from zero Hedge. Doctor Naomi Wolf war on ranchers
Speaker 2: an erosion of food freedom. Brianna Sagdall, policy fellow at
Speaker 2: the Beef Initiative, sat down with author and journalist doctor
Speaker 2: nae Omi Wolf, a long time liberty advocate, and her husband,
Speaker 2: counterintelligence specialists Brian o'shay KWD sixty eight. Raccoons don't kill people.
Speaker 2: People kill people, yes, and of course we all know.
Speaker 2: The only thing that stops a bad guy with the
Speaker 2: raccoon is a good guy with a raccoon. That's why
Speaker 2: you need to keep your raccoon on you at all times.
Speaker 2: You can't be caught without your raccoon in times of distress.
Speaker 2: You want to make sure that you are ready and
Speaker 2: trained in the art of raccoon warfare. That is the future.
Speaker 2: Discussing Brian and Naomi's new podcast Together in the Layer,
Speaker 2: the three launched into a hard hitting conversation about what
Speaker 2: may be the most important, yet overlooked battleground in modern warfare,
Speaker 2: the nation's food supply chain. The Trio exposes how multinational corporations,
Speaker 2: global health bureaucracies, and hostile foreign interests have plagiarized and
Speaker 2: hijacked the fight for freedom and food. The result a
Speaker 2: rapidly vanishing front line for starters. Wolf explains how a
Speaker 2: group of volunteer researchers who had spent three years laboriously
Speaker 2: exposing internal Pfizer documents that the FDA attempted to hide
Speaker 2: for seventy five years, were not given proper accreditation for
Speaker 2: their efforts. We're dealing with stolen valor here, folks at
Speaker 2: Steve Bannon's kind of initiative. I spent the last three
Speaker 2: years of my life overseeing a very historic effort in
Speaker 2: which thirty two one hundred and fifty doctors and scientists
Speaker 2: who worked pro bono with a war room and daily
Speaker 2: clout research team read through four one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand pages of internal Pfizer documents that were released under
Speaker 2: a court order subsequent to a successful lawsuit by attorney
Speaker 2: Aaron Siri against the FDA. Wolf recaps recap, Wolf and Bannon.
Speaker 2: Late last year, a huge renowned feminists and ex Clinton
Speaker 2: adviser endorses Donald Trump for president. The people I voted
Speaker 2: for silence my voice. They killed thousands of people and
Speaker 2: put the man Steve Banner, who tried to help me
Speaker 2: save lives of thousands people in prison. Wolf a former
Speaker 2: political consultant, was contacted by Senator Ron Johnson to ask
Speaker 2: about the most important findings as hearings would be held
Speaker 2: after the inauguration of President Trump. Ed Berkevich n Amy Kelly,
Speaker 2: upon filing a Freedom of Information Act, built a timeline
Speaker 2: from emails and texts related to myocarditis. Wolf says, it
Speaker 2: is the most is the most significant finding, as it
Speaker 2: reveals a cover up at the highest levels. White House
Speaker 2: staffers were being notified by the Israeli Ministry of Health
Speaker 2: and pediatrician organizations that they were seeing a signal myocarditis
Speaker 2: and kids, Wolf says, And instead of these people coming
Speaker 2: clean and telling the parents of America, stop right away,
Speaker 2: don't inject your kids, what you see in the emails
Speaker 2: is a cover up. All the information was presented in
Speaker 2: a Senate hearing, Wolfe's team was neither invited to share
Speaker 2: testimony nor even attend. An issue that boils down to
Speaker 2: safety for the academics who risk everything to get the
Speaker 2: truth out. In my latest essay about my why credit matters,
Speaker 2: It's not about me, It's not about you know narcissism,
Speaker 2: Wolf explains, it's about safety and protection, pointing to her
Speaker 2: husband Wolf shares the security risks. Brian spends maybe three
Speaker 2: quarters of his time dealing with the death threats I
Speaker 2: get every month. He and other people with deep intelligence
Speaker 2: and you know, security backgrounds have warned me that the
Speaker 2: way to stay safe is to be loudest, right, And
Speaker 2: that's true for these researchers as well. I mean they
Speaker 2: took tremendous risks, you know during the Bide administration. ALTH
Speaker 2: if you American understand having credit taken for their work
Speaker 2: from simple expost to memes, most have no idea this
Speaker 2: is happening within their food supply. The USDA's labeling scam
Speaker 2: is IP theft. Sagdal connects the dots by outlining what
Speaker 2: she calls plagiarism. The quiet moval, a mandatory country of
Speaker 2: origin labeling. In twenty fifteen, under pressure from the Big
Speaker 2: Four and the World Trade Organization, Congress removed cool that move,
Speaker 2: which was an uncool move by them. That move, Sagdal explains,
Speaker 2: let's multinational meat packers repackaged foreign meat as product of
Speaker 2: USA so long as it was processed domestically. It's not
Speaker 2: just deception, it's intellectual property theft, Sagdal says, America didn't
Speaker 2: just lose control of its food system. It was globalized, militarized,
Speaker 2: and labeled safe. The USDA buried, USDA buried origin label
Speaker 2: Smith's Field. Smithfield shipped high protein pork to the PLA
Speaker 2: People's Liberation Army, the who made land use a health issue.
Speaker 2: This isn't regulation, it's regime change via food. That's right.
Speaker 2: They want you sick and weak and unhealthy. They want
Speaker 2: every aspect of your life to be poisonous and toxic
Speaker 2: to you, whether it's actively injecting you with poison, or
Speaker 2: making your food supply toxic as well, or poisoning the
Speaker 2: atmosphere around you. Similar to Wolfe's research team, it takes
Speaker 2: American ranchers two to three years to bring a product
Speaker 2: to market ifout proper credit. Farmers are being a race
Speaker 2: from their own supply chain, their label, their genetics, their standards,
Speaker 2: it's all being plagiarized. According to Sogdal, this has led
Speaker 2: to hollowing out of rural America. Amof responds bluntly, that's
Speaker 2: betrayal of trust at the highest level. So I can't
Speaker 2: even know if I'm feeding my kids Chinese beef from
Speaker 2: subhuman conditions. That's outrageous. I'm doing my best to source
Speaker 2: what I think is grass fed, hormone free beef from
Speaker 2: American producers, but I can't even know if this came
Speaker 2: from Brazil or China, and we just run through a
Speaker 2: conveyor belt in Nebraska. That's a betrayal of trust. At
Speaker 2: the highest level. Things get darker. A che reveals that
Speaker 2: Chinese own Smithfield Foods has begun genetically modifying pork with
Speaker 2: triple the protein, only to ship that meat back to China.
Speaker 2: You're marked for the People's aberration Army, the leftovers sold
Speaker 2: to the American public. That's right. The Chinese are going
Speaker 2: to get the triple protein pork. You're gonna get whatever's
Speaker 2: left over. Not that I would necessarily want some genetically
Speaker 2: modified pork, even if it has been given triple the
Speaker 2: amount of protein. That sounds suspect and strange. They're augmenting
Speaker 2: the beef for their military oshe says, and offloading the
Speaker 2: rest on us. That's not just bad policy, it's national suicide. Also,
Speaker 2: you'd think it might just be easier to start giving
Speaker 2: the troops steroids over in China if they're that committed
Speaker 2: to giving them that amount of protein. Might as well
Speaker 2: just juice them all the way up. They'd have a
Speaker 2: full army of armies out there. Oh, I get it.
Speaker 2: Wolf exclaims. They're selling it as if it's American beef,
Speaker 2: but it's not American beef, and all the resources that
Speaker 2: go into making American beef are appropriated. That's exactly the
Speaker 2: same as Ip theft, Wolf concludes John the Floor. O'sha
Speaker 2: warns that under the Who's One Health Framework, now endorsed
Speaker 2: by one hundred and ninety one hundred and ninety three nations,
Speaker 2: global authorities are redefining disease control to include land use,
Speaker 2: water rights, and food production. Really, if you look at
Speaker 2: One Health, it's the same thing Mao was doing. O'sha says,
Speaker 2: that's right, as we learned from the pandemic. If they
Speaker 2: come to Brianna's ranch and they say, hey, you know what,
Speaker 2: we don't really like the way you're raising your cows.
Speaker 2: We're going to send in some of our specialists, which
Speaker 2: osay O'Shea says, the Surgeon General has a uniformed army
Speaker 2: of This is how they seize your food. They love
Speaker 2: going after food, whether it's Mao in China sending people
Speaker 2: with no experience out into the fields, causing a causing
Speaker 2: a massive famine. What happened with the halidamor where they
Speaker 2: just came in and they harvested it all and put
Speaker 2: it into silos and let it rot. They love attacking
Speaker 2: the food supply. It's an easy way to control people.
Speaker 2: If they don't have food, they don't have anything WELLFADS
Speaker 2: is the most invasive tyranny ever devised in It's wrapped
Speaker 2: in the language of care. It's Maoism with a lab
Speaker 2: coat one health lets. Unelected bureaucrats in Geneva redefine anything
Speaker 2: they want as a biosecurity threat. If your ranch doesn't
Speaker 2: meet their climate goals, that's a health emergency. If your
Speaker 2: cattle don't get the right injections, another emergency. This is
Speaker 2: how they seize your food by declaring war on your independence,
Speaker 2: says Brian O'Shea Oche, drawing from his counterintelligence background, explains
Speaker 2: how China's unrestricted warfare doctrine is already playing out on
Speaker 2: US soil. They've said it, O'Shea says the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 2: They have said they want to be the global hegemon.
Speaker 2: By twenty forty nine, the one hundred year anniversary of
Speaker 2: the Chinese Communist Party, and they say they will get
Speaker 2: there by several means, all aligned in that nineteen ninety
Speaker 2: nine document Unrestricted Warfare. If wanted to destroy or greatly
Speaker 2: sideline the United States by twenty forty nine, how would
Speaker 2: you do it? And I think of siege warfare? Oshe explains.
Speaker 2: If you kill all of our food and you poison
Speaker 2: all of our water, that's what happens in siege warfare,
Speaker 2: you surround them and run them out of food, or
Speaker 2: in case of the Romans at Mesada, you surround them
Speaker 2: and you fill in a gorge so you can get
Speaker 2: over there, because you're not going home until all of
Speaker 2: them are dead. We're losing seventy seven family farms per day,
Speaker 2: Sagdal confirmed, before adding cattle volumes are at a seventy
Speaker 2: year low. We're losing the ability to feed ourselves as
Speaker 2: a nation. The solution radical self reliance. The message is clear.
Speaker 2: Liberty begins with taking back control of the food supply.
Speaker 2: That's right, no matter how else you prepare, If you
Speaker 2: don't have food, no matter what else you have, it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. You need to be able to support yourself.
Speaker 2: You need to be able to feed yourself in times
Speaker 2: of struggle, in times of distress, if you are forced
Speaker 2: to go hat in hand to the government, they have
Speaker 2: total control over you. That's why it's important be able
Speaker 2: to grow your own food or raise your own food
Speaker 2: if you have the ability. Chickens, of course, are a
Speaker 2: great way to do that. They are relatively uninvasive, They
Speaker 2: don't take that much space comparatively to a lot of
Speaker 2: other things, and you get eggs from them as well.
Speaker 2: That is the main place to start. No matter what
Speaker 2: else you're stockpiling, whether it's gold, silver, or ammo, if
Speaker 2: you don't have food, it's not going to do you
Speaker 2: much good in the long run. There's no better feeling
Speaker 2: this summer than waking up early in the am, brewing
Speaker 2: a fresh cup of coffee and stepping outside to gather
Speaker 2: eggs from the chicken coop and greens from the garden
Speaker 2: without stepping one foot in the supermarket controlled by globalists.
Speaker 2: That is that is where the article ends. And yes, you,
Speaker 2: as I said, need to be able to feed yourself,
Speaker 2: or at least feed yourself partially, and interface with other
Speaker 2: people that have other types of food so you can
Speaker 2: barter back and forth and support each other. Need to
Speaker 2: have a community, need to be able to work together
Speaker 2: to shore up each other's strengths and weaknesses. If you
Speaker 2: don't have a community, it's going to be very, very hard.
Speaker 2: You want to have enough people that you are able
Speaker 2: to defend your area. Got some comments Here be my
Speaker 2: Valentine emotional attack Raccoon shadow boxer. Maybe there's hope for
Speaker 2: my raccoon. Launch your defense system.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: As soon as you get that up and running, I
Speaker 2: will be your first purchaser. You let me know when
Speaker 2: it's available, and I will lay out the money. I
Speaker 2: will demonstrate it live on Air sixty one. Direct Raccoon
Speaker 2: Energy Weapon DREW systems will soon proliferate the battlescape. That's right.
Speaker 2: The wars of the future are fought by raccoons. The
Speaker 2: chittering can be heard for miles. It's uncanny, nothing like
Speaker 2: it has ever been seen before. Nature's drone swarms exactly.
Speaker 2: No trash can is safe. You will turn over the
Speaker 2: trash or you will be annihilated by the raccoon swarm.
Speaker 2: Just the way it is, folks, the future is bleak.
Speaker 2: It is filled with furry bandits, and there's nothing we
Speaker 2: can do to stop it. It's just the way it is. Well,
Speaker 2: we're gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,
Speaker 2: we're going to look at America's hidden subsidy to India.
Speaker 2: I went into this a couple weeks ago, maybe a
Speaker 2: few weeks ago. At this point it all starts to
Speaker 2: blend together. But America, of course, the remittances is helping
Speaker 2: grow India's economy. It isn't that wonderful another way that
Speaker 2: we're propping up another nation. Stay with us, folks, We'll
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 1: Us defending the American dream. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Night Show. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks. Jerry Altalo, don't raccoon me, dude, that's right.
Speaker 2: What are you gonna do? Throw a raccoon at me?
Speaker 2: Quote from a man who had raccoons thrown at him.
Speaker 2: Lance had a great comment, cry havoc and let slip
Speaker 2: the raccoons of war. That's right. Ah, finally some good news.
Speaker 2: Now onto some less good news. America is hidden subsidy
Speaker 2: to India by Amanda Bartilada. The recently proposed US tax
Speaker 2: on ribbons is sent abroad by non citizens has exposed
Speaker 2: a truth few Americans have been told. The United States
Speaker 2: has become a primary financial engine of the Indian economy.
Speaker 2: That's right, exporting their young men out into different countries
Speaker 2: so that they can send money back home. The revision,
Speaker 2: quietly included by the White House by the House Ways
Speaker 2: and Means Committee, is a broader legislative package introduced on
Speaker 2: May twelfth, commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill,
Speaker 2: initially proposed a five percent tax on international money transfers
Speaker 2: by non citizen visa holders and Greek card recipients. The
Speaker 2: goal was straightforward, to recoup a small portion of the
Speaker 2: vast sums of untaxed income being sent out of America
Speaker 2: every year. Of course, as you remember, I covered this,
Speaker 2: as I said, a few weeks ago, we went in
Speaker 2: and looked at the amount and how it had risen
Speaker 2: over the years based on estimates. With the backlash from
Speaker 2: Indian government officials, media outlets, lobbying groups, and diaspora advocates
Speaker 2: was swift and intense. Within weeks, the rate was reduced
Speaker 2: to three and a half percent, down from five. Of course,
Speaker 2: what triggered such fervent opposition. The answer lies in the
Speaker 2: numbers one trillion en counting. According to India's own financial
Speaker 2: disclosures and public facing documents, over the past decade, the
Speaker 2: country has received nearly one trillion in foreign remittances that
Speaker 2: as transfers of money from a migrant worker back to
Speaker 2: their home. It is proportionate share of those remittances originate
Speaker 2: from Indian workers in the United States. In fiscal year
Speaker 2: twenty twenty three through twenty four, India banked one hundred
Speaker 2: and twenty five billion in remittances, the US contributing twenty
Speaker 2: seven point seven or approximately thirty four point six billion,
Speaker 2: making the US India's single largest source of foreign income.
Speaker 2: By comparison, India's foreign direct investment inflows during the same
Speaker 2: period stood at just sixty two billion in its entire
Speaker 2: national defense, but defense budget in twenty twenty four was
Speaker 2: nearly fifty five billion dollars less than the remittances it received.
Speaker 2: That's right, America is funding India. Isn't that wonderful. You'd
Speaker 2: think with all that money coming in, they could afford
Speaker 2: more bathrooms. In short, Indian nationals working in the US
Speaker 2: are sending home more money than India attracts in global
Speaker 2: investment and more than it spends defending itself. Indian officials
Speaker 2: have acknowledged what few in the US government seem willing to.
Speaker 2: These remittances serve as a vital cushion to cover current
Speaker 2: accou count deficits and stabilize the value of the rupee
Speaker 2: against the dollar. In economic terms, this means India relies
Speaker 2: heavily on money earned by Indian nationals abroad, particularly in
Speaker 2: the US, to maintain internal stability. But this dependency is
Speaker 2: not passive, is the product of a deliberate policy that gaddy.
Speaker 2: Gati Foundation is one key initiative, which, as Roldnet Daily
Speaker 2: has reported in depth, is a state orchestrated program designed
Speaker 2: to export millions of Indian workers, skilled and semi skilled
Speaker 2: into high income economies like Americas, with the explicit objective
Speaker 2: of capturing jobs the host country. A key purpose of
Speaker 2: this program is maximizing inward remitten's flows to boost the
Speaker 2: remitten's share of India's GDP from two and a half
Speaker 2: percent to four to five percent, resulting an increase of
Speaker 2: three hundred billion annually. And as I covered when I
Speaker 2: talked about this before, India has a huge diploma mill problem.
Speaker 2: They have all kinds of companies out there that will
Speaker 2: just fake diplomas for people. They will just churn them
Speaker 2: out and make sure that you look good on a
Speaker 2: resume when you send it in to whatever company you're
Speaker 2: trying to apply for. Market it as a solution to
Speaker 2: a projected global labor gap, GADDY seeks to institutionalize India's
Speaker 2: dominance over international labor markets, reshape global migration policy, position
Speaker 2: India as the world's trusted migration partner. That's right, we
Speaker 2: need more Indians, folks. We can't get enough of them.
Speaker 2: We need them here because they've done such a good
Speaker 2: job making India a wonderful country that everyone wants to
Speaker 2: emulate and be like. The Gatty Foundation and the Government
Speaker 2: of India see this as an opportunity to offload India's
Speaker 2: mounting youth unemployment and domestic jobs crisis onto the labor
Speaker 2: markets of the US, UK, Germany, Japan and others, directly
Speaker 2: undermining native workers while driving huge remittance flows to fuel
Speaker 2: India's own growth. The legislative proposal in Washington was modest
Speaker 2: by any global standard. The reduced three and a half
Speaker 2: percent remittence tax would apply only to non citizens on
Speaker 2: temporary work view or with lawful permanent residency sending money
Speaker 2: out of the US. Yet, Indian media outlets, think tanks
Speaker 2: and government linked analysts labeled it a discriminatory measure targeting
Speaker 2: non US citizens politically motivated in need an effort to
Speaker 2: force self deportation among Indian professionals. What means it's discriminatory? Yes,
Speaker 2: because it's not applied to everyone, it is technically by
Speaker 2: definition discriminatory. It picks and chooses. This is absurd. This
Speaker 2: dire narrative, amplified by both foreign and domestic lobbying efforts,
Speaker 2: suggests that very lunar measure is xenophobic and unfairly targeting Indians.
Speaker 2: India's media outrage reveals the sense of entitlement of that
Speaker 2: nation and its elites and believe they are owed unfettered
Speaker 2: access to US wages. That they attempt to recoup even
Speaker 2: a small portion of that wealth is a sure sign
Speaker 2: of their victimhood. Indian trade groups warned the tax would
Speaker 2: deter global talent and threatened bilateral relations between India and
Speaker 2: the US. Oh no retaliations from India? What are they
Speaker 2: going to do? One can only imagine the horrors they
Speaker 2: might inflict upon US if we're not able to import,
Speaker 2: they're high value workers. While Indian nationals broad are encouraged
Speaker 2: to remit money back to their homeland and often celebrated
Speaker 2: for doing so, the economic impact on the host nation
Speaker 2: remains largely unexamined. Each dollar sent abroad is one not
Speaker 2: spent in the US economy, not invested in American infrastructure,
Speaker 2: and not taxed at the federal or state level. Once
Speaker 2: it leaves the US gives employers, many of whom sponsored
Speaker 2: temporary work visas, benefit from low, lower labor costs, but
Speaker 2: American workers bear the brunt of wage competition, job displacement,
Speaker 2: and broader economic hollowing that comes from capital flight through
Speaker 2: massive numbers of foreign workers in the US. I've also,
Speaker 2: of course shared stories before where once Indians achieve a
Speaker 2: position where they can hire people, they almost solely hire
Speaker 2: other Indians. They make sure that they engage in racially
Speaker 2: nepotistic practices. They want to ensure that they get more
Speaker 2: of their own people in A national conversation is long overdue.
Speaker 2: Their mintance debate has revealed a broader and more urgent question.
Speaker 2: How should the United States manage the intersection of immigration, labor,
Speaker 2: and outbound capital. India's response the proposed tax has shown
Speaker 2: just how entrenched the expectation of American subsidiation has become.
Speaker 2: With large issues not India's behavior, it is America's inaction.
Speaker 2: A trillion dollars in foreign transfer should not go unoticed,
Speaker 2: nor should the policy frameworks that enabled it. This time
Speaker 2: for US lawmakers, economists, and voters to confront the reality
Speaker 2: that remittances are not neutral, They are not charities, and
Speaker 2: they are not free. They are transfer of wealth, often untaxed,
Speaker 2: frequently unexamined, and increasingly misaligned a long term interests of
Speaker 2: the American people, no matter what it is, no matter
Speaker 2: where it is, no matter what we're talking about, the
Speaker 2: American middle class, the American worker is the one who
Speaker 2: pays the price. How much more can America ford to
Speaker 2: give way before there's nothing left to protect? Yes, well,
Speaker 2: they want to give away everything. They want all of
Speaker 2: it gone. They don't want you to have any ability
Speaker 2: to earn capital, to gain wealth, to set yourself up
Speaker 2: in a way where you're not immediately on the verge
Speaker 2: of poverty. If anything happens, our guest, tony Arderburn is ready,
Speaker 2: We're going to be talking with him about what's going
Speaker 2: on with Gold. But before that, we have a comment
Speaker 2: from Doug to Double seven. Any updates on David Well,
Speaker 2: I've said this before, but I want to make sure
Speaker 2: that I continue to give you updates. When he first
Speaker 2: came home, he was a very weak He had to
Speaker 2: use a wheelchair. Then he was able to walk with
Speaker 2: a walker, then a cane, and now he's largely free
Speaker 2: and up and moving about on his own. Doesn't even
Speaker 2: really need the cane at all times anymore. But the
Speaker 2: main issue is his speech. He is still struggling with
Speaker 2: clear speech. So please pray for the nerves in his
Speaker 2: tongue and the damage that was done to his vocal cords.
Speaker 2: Please pray that they would be healed, that God wouldn't
Speaker 2: miraculously restore him. So keep the in your prayers. That
Speaker 2: is the biggest thing we want prayer for. Keep that
Speaker 2: foremost in your mind when you pray for our family.
Speaker 2: Have a comment from a Syrian girl and of course Travis.
Speaker 2: India is world renowned for equity, including a university. We
Speaker 2: need to be more like India. That's right, India the
Speaker 2: bastion of equity and inclusion. There's not any horror stories
Speaker 2: that come out of India. It's nothing but wonderful, wonderful
Speaker 2: tales of a utopia, which is why they're all so
Speaker 2: desperate to escape it. But as I said, Tony Rderburn
Speaker 2: is our guest and he's ready. So we're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break and when we come back, we're
Speaker 2: going to talk to him. What's going on with gold
Speaker 2: and silver? Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show. You I'm listening
Speaker 1: to the dim Did Night Show making sense common again.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks, and joining us now is Tony Ardburn
Speaker 2: of Wise Wolf Golden. Tony has set up David Dog
Speaker 2: Gold so that if you would like to start setting
Speaker 2: aside some silver and gold for yourself, you can go
Speaker 2: through us. He has been very kind to do that.
Speaker 2: He also has the Wolf Pack where if you would
Speaker 2: like to subscribe and monthly set aside a little bit
Speaker 2: and start getting outside the Fiat monetary system, he can
Speaker 2: do that for you. So thank you for joining us, Tony.
Speaker 5: What's great to be here, Travis. Good to see you.
Speaker 2: Good to see you too. It's always a pleasure having
Speaker 2: you on and it's always just a fun time, which
Speaker 2: I appreciate. You know, it makes talk to you about
Speaker 2: these scary situations a little bit easier when you've got
Speaker 2: someone that you can bounce off of and have a
Speaker 2: conversation with and not just sit here and you know,
Speaker 2: stare into the abyss of the articles, right.
Speaker 5: I feel that. I feel that very much. You know,
Speaker 5: if you stare into the bys long enough, it stares
Speaker 5: back into you. And I think that's I think that
Speaker 5: goes on daily with with my research. But yeah, well
Speaker 5: we'll make it as fun as possible.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's always a good time, and we try to
Speaker 2: maintain a positive outlook even in these certain times. As
Speaker 2: we were talking about during the break, I'd like to
Speaker 2: start with how gold has surpassed the euro as the
Speaker 2: second largest reserve asset and where do you see that going.
Speaker 2: Which you think that's going to do for the gold market.
Speaker 5: Well, only one more currency to surpass, and that's the dollar.
Speaker 5: That'll be the gold will be the number one reserve
Speaker 5: asset of all central banks. I think, you know, maybe
Speaker 5: not by the close of this decade, but soon. You know,
Speaker 5: that happened rapidly after what was called Basel three with
Speaker 5: the Bank of International Settlements in twenty twenty one, they
Speaker 5: moved gold from a Tier three asset to a Tier
Speaker 5: one asset, which meant that central banks could show it
Speaker 5: as a currency reserve on their balance sheet. And after
Speaker 5: that the central bank started to move more into gold.
Speaker 5: But it really happened rapidly after twenty twenty two, the
Speaker 5: sanctions that were placed on Russia after the invasion of
Speaker 5: Ukraine and the de dollarization. Travis, that's really what's driving this,
Speaker 5: and you know, that's kind of old news. I think
Speaker 5: I've been talking about that for over a year, maybe
Speaker 5: more about how the gold supplanted the euro as the
Speaker 5: second held reserve asset by central banks. But it's recently
Speaker 5: the European Central Bank came out and they started waving
Speaker 5: these like red flag saying gold is really dangerous. Gold
Speaker 5: is threatening the global monetary order. Yeah, it does. It
Speaker 5: threatens fake, it threatens the Fiat monetary system worldwide, because again,
Speaker 5: these central banks don't hoard their own currencies necessarily, they
Speaker 5: don't have stockpiles, they don't create that, and then stockpilot
Speaker 5: they want to move to something that holds and has
Speaker 5: intrinsic value and is a store of value, and that's gold.
Speaker 5: And this is kind of a we're a wash and
Speaker 5: a sea of fake around on the world, and that's
Speaker 5: a you know, the debt crisis that's looming, and of
Speaker 5: course the monetary system is being reset. All this is
Speaker 5: driving these central banks to to go into gold.
Speaker 2: Yes, they're looking at it saying, hm, perhaps we need
Speaker 2: something of actual value on the books. Perhaps we want
Speaker 2: something in the vault that isn't just promises from a
Speaker 2: country that seems to be spending itself into oblivion or
Speaker 2: over here like no, no, you can trust us. Please
Speaker 2: just give us, just buy some more of our debt.
Speaker 2: We're definitely going to pay it back one day, we promise.
Speaker 2: Here's another few billion dollars for Israel. Here's some more
Speaker 2: money from Ukraine for Ukraine. Back back and forth it goes.
Speaker 5: But that's that's the recipe. It's just the you know,
Speaker 5: so if you want to know how many dollars there are,
Speaker 5: just write the word more. That's just going to be
Speaker 5: more dollars. That's how they're going to continue to create them,
Speaker 5: infinite them into oblivion. And that's why the FIAT has
Speaker 5: no bottom, and gold and silver and bitcoin have no top.
Speaker 2: It reminds me of I think it was a JD.
Speaker 2: Rockfeller who said it when someone asked, like, well, how
Speaker 2: much money is enough in the federal reserve? Just just
Speaker 2: a little bit more, just a little bit, that's all
Speaker 2: we need. You know, we'll fix it this time if
Speaker 2: we just get to print a few more dollars. And
Speaker 2: of course silver has been kind of historically undervalued comparatively
Speaker 2: to gold, but it seems that we're again reaching a
Speaker 2: new high here. How is the silver market doing comparatively
Speaker 2: and how has the gold market impacted it if it has.
Speaker 5: Well, it's something interesting you've mentioned India, the wonderful utopia
Speaker 5: that it is. Oh yes, I like the underlying humor
Speaker 5: Travis always but interesting history. The rupee there currency de jore.
Speaker 5: It gets its name from rupia, which is the word
Speaker 5: Hindu word for silver. So that's something that you know,
Speaker 5: silver has been a monetary metal throughout history, alongside gold.
Speaker 5: And you know it's only in recent history that countries
Speaker 5: started to go away I think from the silver and
Speaker 5: gold standard. Switzerland was the last country in two thousand
Speaker 5: and two to decouple its currency from silver entirely. And
Speaker 5: I think, you know, it's kind of languished for a
Speaker 5: long time. As you know, an industrial metal is kind
Speaker 5: of set flat for a long time. It's it's been
Speaker 5: accumulated by large banks like JP Morgan Chase used, you know, highly,
Speaker 5: it is highly used by the military industrial complexes. I've
Speaker 5: talked about many times. There's five hundred ounces of silver
Speaker 5: and a Tomahawk missile, which is a monster box of silver.
Speaker 5: So there's a lot of uses of silver. And again
Speaker 5: I looked at metrics like the Russians adding silver to
Speaker 5: their strategic reserve. So it's remonetizing again, and it's remonetizing
Speaker 5: in the face of a lot of these contracts that
Speaker 5: have been called after this. You know, I think the
Speaker 5: tariffs were a black Swan event. Really. I don't think
Speaker 5: people were anticipating the blanket tariffs and then the kind
Speaker 5: of the question mark that hung over in them and
Speaker 5: the unknown about whether or not there was gold and
Speaker 5: silver would have a tariff on them. So a lot
Speaker 5: of these bullion houses got cleared out overseas and some
Speaker 5: of the silver got repatriot Anyway, it has created this
Speaker 5: cascading effect of supply shock, and I think it's a
Speaker 5: mini supply shock. It's not even the real one, but
Speaker 5: it's created this mini supply shock, and you're talking about
Speaker 5: two hundred and fifty million or so ounces a year
Speaker 5: in deficit, so they have to take that from the
Speaker 5: above ground supply. It's in short, the mining isn't sufficient
Speaker 5: to supply the demand for silver because of the price,
Speaker 5: and that's going to be changing soon. A lot of
Speaker 5: major banks are predicting, you know, forty dollars silver within
Speaker 5: the next year. I see, it's probably most likely getting
Speaker 5: up to break its all time high, you know, in
Speaker 5: the next couple of years. Again, I'm not giving you
Speaker 5: investment advice. I was to say that because I'm not
Speaker 5: an investor, but I do. I do look at the
Speaker 5: history of that, and it's forty five years ago silver
Speaker 5: broke its all time high at fifty two dollars and
Speaker 5: fifty cents, and it hasn't done that since. I mean,
Speaker 5: it's had you know, it got close in twenty eleven,
Speaker 5: but we've had this major debasement of the dollar since
Speaker 5: nineteen eighty and since two thousand and eleven. You know,
Speaker 5: you just look at the debt that's in kurt of
Speaker 5: the US. I think what was in twenty eleven I
Speaker 5: think the debt of the US was around eleven trillion,
Speaker 5: so thirty six thirty.
Speaker 2: Days when only it was only eleven trillion dollars.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean even Elon Musk tweeted out the other
Speaker 5: day it was like, it took us two hundred years
Speaker 5: to go, you know, eleven or trillion in debt or so,
Speaker 5: and then we did that in the last ten you know,
Speaker 5: and the last you know five, Really, I mean, we
Speaker 5: put this massive doubling of the debt. So it's it's again.
Speaker 5: I think it's really the metrics that you're seeing with
Speaker 5: silver are really in line with what's happening to the
Speaker 5: monetary system. It's just moving slowly, and that's good. I
Speaker 5: think it's been a real blessing because people that are
Speaker 5: understanding that silver is not just an industrial metal, it's
Speaker 5: not just the most thermo conducted metal, but it's also
Speaker 5: a monetary metal and it's history. I think it will
Speaker 5: be a on a tarry metal again officially, and so
Speaker 5: I think that a lot of countries and big entities
Speaker 5: are looking at that and making those plays. While the
Speaker 5: price is low. Just I think these prices are still
Speaker 5: ridiculously low, given the fact that we live in this
Speaker 5: you know, upside down fiat world.
Speaker 2: That's right. Sometimes you just look at it and it's like,
Speaker 2: this doesn't make sense. In fact, most of the time
Speaker 2: you look at anything that's reported the news, you just go,
Speaker 2: this doesn't make any sense at all. We've got a
Speaker 2: good comment here from Ron Helton. One silver is the
Speaker 2: coin of the common man. Sure, if you have lots
Speaker 2: of money and get yourself some gold, but that is true.
Speaker 2: Silver is a lot more. It's a lot easier to
Speaker 2: start getting into gold. Of course, you are able to
Speaker 2: fractionalize gold very very small and start getting people to
Speaker 2: accumulate it that way. But if you want to get
Speaker 2: you know, coins and things and you know, around this size,
Speaker 2: silver is a great place to start it as it
Speaker 2: has always had some historic value and it will always
Speaker 2: have some level of value because it is now. It
Speaker 2: has intrinsic value. It's not just a piece of paper
Speaker 2: with someone's promise on it. It says we promise this
Speaker 2: is money, we promise will continue to accept this. Silver
Speaker 2: is a silver is a very special metal. In my opinion,
Speaker 2: I've always liked silver coins, but that's just from my
Speaker 2: perspective of enjoying coins, not from a financial perspective, I
Speaker 2: just like coins personally. But as you're saying, the tariffs
Speaker 2: have had a large impact on the market, but they
Speaker 2: haven't even fully taken effect yet. The inflation that is
Speaker 2: going to come is still on the way the As
Speaker 2: you said, we've got a headline here, silver breaks key
Speaker 2: resistance miners outperform Junior expert I is fifty dollars target.
Speaker 2: As you're saying, the all time high was fifty to fifty,
Speaker 2: and I believe when it originally hit that it took
Speaker 2: it about six weeks to do it. It hit a high
Speaker 2: and then went on a run to fifty two fifty,
Speaker 2: if what I remember reading was correct. But silver looks
Speaker 2: to be on the rise. It looks to be as
Speaker 2: though it's on its way up, which is nice to
Speaker 2: see that it's finally being valued more properly because it's
Speaker 2: been strange to look at it and go, why aren't
Speaker 2: you doing anything?
Speaker 5: And it's I think the most telling part of everything.
Speaker 5: If you're looking for that kind of looking a lens
Speaker 5: and look into the future to what pricing would be.
Speaker 5: It makes no sense of the gold and silver ratio.
Speaker 5: It makes no sense on the pricing model at one time,
Speaker 5: and it's been about a month ago, it was at
Speaker 5: one hundred to one. So you know, gold was thirty
Speaker 5: five hundred dollars an ounce and silver was thirty five
Speaker 5: dollars an ounce, so it's one hundred to one. And historically,
Speaker 5: I've talked about this many times, that has never been
Speaker 5: the case. Even in times, you know, like ancient times,
Speaker 5: whether it's the you know, the Greeks, the Romans, the Egyptians,
Speaker 5: it was either you know, ten to one, sometimes twenty
Speaker 5: to one. And in the you know, the eighteenth century,
Speaker 5: nineteenth century, especially here in the United States, we had
Speaker 5: a sixteen to one ratio geologically just what geologists say,
Speaker 5: it's seventeen to one in the ground. You know, as
Speaker 5: far as you know ounces of silver to ounces of
Speaker 5: gold geologically that could be mined. So one hundred to
Speaker 5: one is a manufactured, fiat, fake construct. That's that's papered
Speaker 5: over manipulation, and that's not that's not free markets, that's
Speaker 5: not that's not a true price discovery. And I think
Speaker 5: as as this current system unravels and you know, the
Speaker 5: bricks nations become more ascendant, as dedollarization continues, and again
Speaker 5: the old order wanes. I think that reality will set
Speaker 5: in and this there will be a new price evaluation
Speaker 5: on what and price discovery of what silver is worth.
Speaker 5: And I don't think I think we'll look back and
Speaker 5: wonder how we got it so wrong. Why did we
Speaker 5: sit there and think that silver wasn't you know, worth
Speaker 5: one hundred and fifty two hundred dollars an ounce or more.
Speaker 5: And again I'm not telling people run out and buy
Speaker 5: it's going to be worth more. I just I think
Speaker 5: history shows me just how ridiculous this pricing valuation is,
Speaker 5: especially if you know what's happened with the dollar, because
Speaker 5: we have a fixed, fixed model in our head of
Speaker 5: what the dollar's worth, because it's to us it's like
Speaker 5: a you know, it should there should be continuity. You know,
Speaker 5: it buys this much gasoline or this much groceries, or
Speaker 5: this much clothing or whatever. But it doesn't because we
Speaker 5: can see every day the inflation and the erosion of
Speaker 5: purchasing power is built into it. So you know, we
Speaker 5: just have this fixed pricing model. And like I was
Speaker 5: talking to some of the other day about restaurant equipment,
Speaker 5: and I went and looked and see what it's actually
Speaker 5: selling for now I was like, well that was twenty
Speaker 5: years ago. I'm thinking about you know, what's a barbecue
Speaker 5: smoker worth, what's a vina hood worth? You know, all
Speaker 5: the stuff that you would need to do commercial restaurants,
Speaker 5: and you know, all that stuff is not what I
Speaker 5: think it's worth anymore because the dollar doesn't go as far.
Speaker 5: And then all the all the things, all the metrics,
Speaker 5: you know, everything that's built in to make something goes
Speaker 5: up in price, you know, because of the loss of
Speaker 5: purchasing power. So silver is one of those things that's
Speaker 5: just set there for a while. Now we're at a
Speaker 5: thirteen year high, and I think this trend will continue
Speaker 5: because of the supply issue.
Speaker 2: Yes, as you said, you think reality will set back.
Speaker 2: And reminds me of what people said about Steve Jobs.
Speaker 2: When he was around. There was this reality distortion field.
Speaker 2: He could make you believe just about anything, and America
Speaker 2: has had that for a long time regarding well, if
Speaker 2: America comes in and says something, the rest of the
Speaker 2: world kind of goes well, okay, you know, even if
Speaker 2: they know it's not true. America had enough pull, enough
Speaker 2: power to make people just go along with it. But
Speaker 2: now there's other powers in the world and people are
Speaker 2: beginning to realize maybe they don't have that ability anymore.
Speaker 2: Maybe the reality distortion field is about to turn off,
Speaker 2: and things are going to get very real, very fast.
Speaker 5: Well, it always does set in, you know, and you
Speaker 5: kind of have to you kind of have to walk
Speaker 5: between those lines, you know, to be a dreamer and
Speaker 5: to see things that aren't there. What did? I think?
Speaker 5: Something George Bernard Shaw said is like most men look
Speaker 5: at things and ask why I dream things that never
Speaker 5: were and ask why not? You know, that's that's a
Speaker 5: beautiful quote. But in reality you have to have a
Speaker 5: little bit more pragmatism. And I think we especially you know, again,
Speaker 5: thirty years ago, there was a lot of talk about
Speaker 5: fiscal responsibility in our political movements, and you don't hear
Speaker 5: that anymore. I think that's been abandoned. And I think
Speaker 5: that's because of the sheer weight of the crisis that's looming.
Speaker 5: I think you want to just I think the politicians
Speaker 5: and the powers that be would rather not look at
Speaker 5: it because it's so massive at this point. But I
Speaker 5: stare at it because I think this, you know, whether
Speaker 5: it's an election or internal issues or whatever it is,
Speaker 5: I'm looking at the macro, the geopolitical and the monetary system,
Speaker 5: because I think ultimately that will determine more of our
Speaker 5: future reality than anything else, and it's important to pay
Speaker 5: attention to that because it is changing. It's changing rapidly.
Speaker 5: We just you know, every day you get a little
Speaker 5: bit more used to the headlines and like, you know
Speaker 5: where things are moving. But if you're watching the stuff
Speaker 5: I'm watching, it's it's moving fast.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The the economy is always a spooky place. It's always something.
Speaker 2: Anytime I see a headline, it's never good anymore. You know,
Speaker 2: there's never anything that's like, oh nice, that's good to see.
Speaker 2: I'm glad, I'm happy. It's always oh, oh no, that's
Speaker 2: unfortunate to hear. I wish I hadn't wish we hadn't
Speaker 2: had to have that happen. We've got some great comments here,
Speaker 2: Brian and Dev McCartney. I told people years ago that
Speaker 2: silver would be the metal to watch when the gold
Speaker 2: boom started. They always play the side of hand cup
Speaker 2: and ball trick. That's right. They're always playing with their
Speaker 2: hands on the scales when it comes to anything that
Speaker 2: they're dealing with in the economy, whether it's investments or
Speaker 2: whether it's something like metals, silver, gold, They're always playing
Speaker 2: with their hands on the scales. They like to make
Speaker 2: sure that they know how things are going to play
Speaker 2: out for them.
Speaker 5: That's true. I mean, and you you got to look
Speaker 5: at what's ku bono? Who been? Who benefits from these
Speaker 5: prices in our commodities, and especially things like silver, And
Speaker 5: I think, you know, we may answer our own questions
Speaker 5: by looking at who the who consumes the most of it?
Speaker 5: Who holds the most of it? You know? And and again,
Speaker 5: if there's a suppression of price and there's an accumulation,
Speaker 5: who benefits the most by by that price eventually resetting. Well, again,
Speaker 5: that's the those who are accumulating. When people are selling
Speaker 5: to me as a gold and silver dealer, and then
Speaker 5: I see prices continuing to rise, but my buyers start
Speaker 5: to shrink. I wonder, okay, well, the regular people aren't
Speaker 5: buying these big quantities of such and such. Who is
Speaker 5: you know? Some there's always an end buyer. And that's
Speaker 5: what's been happening lately, especially things like gold. You know,
Speaker 5: I see the price continue to go up and up,
Speaker 5: but the orders for you know, ounces of gold, you know,
Speaker 5: wolf packing. Some of the fractional stuff may go up
Speaker 5: because that's everyday people, but those big orders that I
Speaker 5: would see those slowed down. So how would they slow
Speaker 5: down in the face of rising prices. I mean, somebody's buying.
Speaker 5: It would be you know, you think there would there
Speaker 5: would be a correlation there, and what it is, There
Speaker 5: is a correlation. It's just that there's it's big buyers.
Speaker 5: So right now, you know, the you talked about the
Speaker 5: European Central Bank's funny because the euro got supplanted by
Speaker 5: gold as the second most held reserve asset. European Central
Speaker 5: Bank's mad about that. They also say gold is a threat,
Speaker 5: but they also order goals, so they can't. They don't
Speaker 5: know what to do. It's it's the conundrum for them.
Speaker 5: They're kind of stuck there, which I think is funny.
Speaker 5: And I think that's what's happening. You know, not only governments,
Speaker 5: but you know, the multinationals and h you know, banking
Speaker 5: institutions are accumulating and and I think that's we're seeing
Speaker 5: a price reflection. Travis. I think it's really it's just
Speaker 5: just beginning, really because the paper markets are coming apart,
Speaker 5: and it may not be tomorrow. But I think, you know,
Speaker 5: paper gold and silver, we're gonna have a real hard
Speaker 5: time in the future because of counterparty risk. And that's
Speaker 5: why I think, like the Shanghai Gold Exchange, they're building
Speaker 5: satellite warehouses. They're going to be looking around the world
Speaker 5: building exchanges to show physical bullion, you know, moving back
Speaker 5: and forth, because I think the who holds it is
Speaker 5: very important, and trust is built into the system too.
Speaker 5: We've lost so much trust worldwide between entities and nations
Speaker 5: and that so I think physical is and no counterparty
Speaker 5: risk is the way of the future.
Speaker 2: Yes, having it in your hand is a huge deal.
Speaker 2: Doesn't matter if you have, you know, electronic gold, it
Speaker 2: might be good as an investment. Again, I don't give
Speaker 2: investment advice, definitely don't take any from me. But just
Speaker 2: someone telling you, oh, look here, you have a certificate
Speaker 2: that says you're entitled to gold. Should you turn this in?
Speaker 2: Is no good. If anything serious happens, who are you
Speaker 2: going to turn this into? You're just being assured that, yes,
Speaker 2: we promise, we have the gold on hand and we
Speaker 2: will turn it over to you should you want it.
Speaker 2: But that's only you know, that's only going to happen
Speaker 2: if the system stays intact, if it is still there
Speaker 2: and you're able to turn in that piece of paper
Speaker 2: for actual gold, being able to actually hold the gold
Speaker 2: or the silver in your own hands is a much
Speaker 2: better alternative. You have it there, you know where it is,
Speaker 2: You know that it's safe. Since you are the one
Speaker 2: that has it in your possession, You're not trusting someone
Speaker 2: else to keep it safe for you. Now. Of course,
Speaker 2: I know for some people, maybe they have an amount
Speaker 2: that they can't feasibly store in their house safely. I
Speaker 2: don't know what that amount would be, but you know
Speaker 2: is possible. Maybe you've got a large amount of silver
Speaker 2: and gold, you've got a pirate's booty worth, and you
Speaker 2: need somewhere to store it. But on the on average,
Speaker 2: I imagine having it, you know, in your own hands,
Speaker 2: in your own possession, not having to worry that it's
Speaker 2: in some bank somewhere that may decide that they're going
Speaker 2: to seize assets for whatever reason, is a huge benefit
Speaker 2: to peace of mind. We've got another headline here from
Speaker 2: Kitko says global growth slashed and seventy percent of economies,
Speaker 2: but gold, silver and platinum prices will buck the broader
Speaker 2: trend increasing by more than thirty percent in twenty twenty
Speaker 2: five is from the World Bank. So the World Bank
Speaker 2: is saying that they're going to go up as well.
Speaker 2: And I know you've talked about platinum on the show,
Speaker 2: and that's one of those metals that we've had people
Speaker 2: ask about, but you said it's kind of been just there,
Speaker 2: not really doing too much. It's just next to its
Speaker 2: two brothers, kind of hanging out. Right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, platinum hasn't moved much, but I think that will.
Speaker 5: I think that trend will change soon. And it's just
Speaker 5: the whole picture is the world moving into commodities, into
Speaker 5: rare earth, minerals, precious metals, things of that nature, because
Speaker 5: we're reaching that kind of end cycle of this fiat experiment.
Speaker 5: The world followed us in nineteen seventy one onto fiat currencies.
Speaker 5: Like I mentioned earlier, the last currency from a major
Speaker 5: government to go off the silver standard was the Swiss
Speaker 5: in two thousand and two. So since that time, it's
Speaker 5: just a you know, we've created all this currency, this debt,
Speaker 5: and you see that with the Chinese, with the Belton
Speaker 5: Road initiative. You see this right now with the bricks
Speaker 5: nations wanting to revaluate all of their commodities and pricing
Speaker 5: and get away from the London Exchange and the West
Speaker 5: and everything else. It's a move for commodities. Platinum, it's
Speaker 5: kind of that outlier that I've had some people recently
Speaker 5: buy some platinum bullion from me, because if you look
Speaker 5: at the price, and I haven't seen I don't follow
Speaker 5: platinum as much as I should. I do it at
Speaker 5: least once a week, I'll check in on it, but
Speaker 5: you know, just always been under a thousand, under a thousand,
Speaker 5: like you know, it's just like I've done, you know,
Speaker 5: I bought lots of bars, lots of platinum jewelry and
Speaker 5: things like that, and it just kind of sticks right there.
Speaker 5: But I think, you know, just like we talked about
Speaker 5: with silver, it's not so much that the prices of
Speaker 5: these things are going up or the values going up,
Speaker 5: just you're always setting it against a fiat currency which
Speaker 5: is going down. And so even if you just held something,
Speaker 5: as long as it's not being actively suppressed, you know,
Speaker 5: like where they're buying a certain amount or selling a
Speaker 5: certain amount that doesn't exist like silver. I mean, it's
Speaker 5: estimated that for every two hundred and fifty ounce is
Speaker 5: sold in the paper markets that only one ounce exists
Speaker 5: in reality. So that's what does That's another way to
Speaker 5: get price suppression right there. And so platinum may or
Speaker 5: may not have that same sort of problem. I'm sure
Speaker 5: it does, but maybe not to the extent of that.
Speaker 5: And you know, physical platinum, physical goal, physical silver. Palladiums
Speaker 5: another one of those metals that as long as it's
Speaker 5: a rare, you know, precious, you know, metal, then you've
Speaker 5: got a good chance of housing some value there. You know,
Speaker 5: I don't We're not at the top of the market either,
Speaker 5: you know, we're in a fourth turning. There's no this
Speaker 5: is not the top of the market. This is the
Speaker 5: beginning of a monetary revolution. Yeah.
Speaker 2: We have a headline where Wells Fargo says they expect
Speaker 2: gold to reach thirty six hundred by twenty twenty six.
Speaker 2: So they aren't foreseeing it slowing down, they're seeing it
Speaker 2: continuing to go up as well. Got some more great
Speaker 2: comments Nights of the Storm. Silver is severely undervalued, it's
Speaker 2: on sale, and Grey Tiger's Den says silver and gold
Speaker 2: are I armored castle for your savings.
Speaker 1: I like that.
Speaker 2: I think that's a great way to put it. You're
Speaker 2: armoring your savings, making sure that they don't just evaporate
Speaker 2: more from nights to the storm. Right now, with tariffs
Speaker 2: being flipped on and off, the market is not a
Speaker 2: stable place for people to store their wealth. Properties to expensive,
Speaker 2: so metals are very appealing to people. Demand is on
Speaker 2: the rise, so prices will go up. Yes, that is
Speaker 2: very likely true. People want someplace to store their value.
Speaker 2: They're looking around and as you said, property is far
Speaker 2: too expensive. It has gone through the roof. Buying a
Speaker 2: house as a store of value is not an easy
Speaker 2: proposition for people anymore. You have to already have a
Speaker 2: lot of money accrued before you can even think about
Speaker 2: doing something like that. Interesting comment from the Real Octo Spook.
Speaker 2: Silver was expensive when film was the only avenue for pictures.
Speaker 2: Digital produced massive silver surplus. I've yeah, did use silver
Speaker 2: to help develop a film back in the day, didn't they?
Speaker 2: I never did a film photography rue.
Speaker 5: That's true. There's a truth to that as far as
Speaker 5: the demand. But the problem with that argument as well
Speaker 5: is that we still have massive hundreds of millions of
Speaker 5: ounce deficits every year, so that they're still not fulfilling, Like,
Speaker 5: it's not a surplus of silver at the end of
Speaker 5: the year based off of demand. They have to take
Speaker 5: from the above ground supply as far as what's being mined,
Speaker 5: and so I think I think that's a that's a
Speaker 5: like we're not replacing the amount of silver every year
Speaker 5: through mining that's demanded. It's already taken from the above
Speaker 5: ground supply.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one of our viewers men and Man Militia, I
Speaker 2: believe he works in a silver mine and they're having
Speaker 2: to continually ramp up production, if memory serves or they're
Speaker 2: just the demand is growing and they need to just
Speaker 2: try to get more and more out. So he's hopefully
Speaker 2: he's doing well. Hopefully he's earning himself a nice check
Speaker 2: there supplying us with silver. Got another comment from Nights
Speaker 2: of the Storm. It used to take twenty pieces of
Speaker 2: paper to get some gold. Now it takes thirty five
Speaker 2: hundred pieces. That's where the dollar has gone in one
Speaker 2: hundred years.
Speaker 5: That's true. Yeah, it's like, you know, if you look
Speaker 5: at thirty five dollars announce gold nineteen seventy one, it's
Speaker 5: one hundred x you know, to get announced of gold.
Speaker 5: So what happened you know, like it's.
Speaker 1: At Jerome value.
Speaker 2: You know, mister Powell, what's happened? What have you guys
Speaker 2: been doing at the Federal Reserve. I'm curious.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, you know, there was a little bit
Speaker 5: of stabilization for a while with the petro dollars. Let's
Speaker 5: not let's not forget. You know, gold in nineteen seventy
Speaker 5: one was thirty five dollars. In nineteen seventy nine it
Speaker 5: was eight hundred dollars, you know, And I mean it
Speaker 5: was just the history. It's funny when it shows, you
Speaker 5: like when you buttress up against the Fiat versus the
Speaker 5: commodity and especially gold, which is the ultimate monetary metal.
Speaker 5: And uh, it's only gonna it's only going to continue
Speaker 5: to show the weakness in that system and in its
Speaker 5: current form. It's just you know, it's gonna They're going
Speaker 5: to diverge. And know it's going to go wider and
Speaker 5: wider and wider between those two things, as far as
Speaker 5: price is concerned. In the middle and between that is
Speaker 5: the price, and you know, it has people say it's
Speaker 5: going to go up. It has to.
Speaker 2: It has to unless the laws of the universe stop
Speaker 2: working and don't apply it has to. That's the that's
Speaker 2: the truth of it. It's just a matter of how
Speaker 2: long they can keep these things, you know, operating to
Speaker 2: their whims. Eventually, gold and silver always come back. They
Speaker 2: are a store of value. Well, I see that we
Speaker 2: are at eleven o'clock and I know last week I
Speaker 2: kept you way over time, so I don't want to
Speaker 2: impinge upon your time this week, Tony, but I want
Speaker 2: to let let people know you have your own broadcast.
Speaker 2: It airs right after this. Is that going to be
Speaker 2: happening today?
Speaker 5: Yeah, we'll be live on my Twitter at tony Arderburn
Speaker 5: on Rumble in the America Unplugged channel on my YouTube
Speaker 5: at tony Arderburn. You come find us over there, and
Speaker 5: we're gonna that's be my first show in a while,
Speaker 5: so yeah, come over there and join the conversation. I
Speaker 5: guess it'll be kind of a continuation of what we
Speaker 5: talked about, but a little bit of parapolitics mixed in.
Speaker 2: That's right, And hopefully we saw that Rumble has added
Speaker 2: a raid feature. Maybe we can raid your show after
Speaker 2: the show ends and pass the viewers over. We'll have
Speaker 2: to figure that setting out, but thank you.
Speaker 5: I'll be hosting here next week. That's right, we'll make
Speaker 5: that announcement. That'll be fun.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: I told the folks at the beginning of the show,
Speaker 2: you will be hosting Monday and Tuesday. That way, you
Speaker 2: have graciously accepted the burden. That way, my wife and
Speaker 2: I can go visit her family and make sure that
Speaker 2: they get to play with our son and spend time
Speaker 2: with them and all that good stuff. We want to
Speaker 2: make sure that all the grandparents get enough time with them.
Speaker 5: My pleasure.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Tony, and again the Ardiburn Radio transmission on Twitter.
Speaker 2: He's here on Rumble as well, so check him out.
Speaker 2: We'll try to pass with a raid after the show ends.
Speaker 2: And of course, Davidknight dot gold if you would like
Speaker 2: to get outside the FIAT monetary system, Tony has set
Speaker 2: that up. You can get yourself some gold or silver
Speaker 2: or gold and silver and support the show at the
Speaker 2: same time. Thank you so much, Tony. I really appreciate
Speaker 2: you coming on with us.
Speaker 5: Appreciate you. Travis, Talk soon.
Speaker 2: Talk soon, thank you. All right, folks, we are going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break and then I will be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show analyzing the globalists.
Speaker 1: Next move now the David nutshell using free speech to
Speaker 1: free minds. It's the David Knight Show. You're coding the
Speaker 1: mainstream propaganda. It's the David Night Show. You're listening to
Speaker 1: the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks. The Beach Boys made some wonderful music.
Speaker 2: And I'm sure as you all heard, Brian Wilson passed
Speaker 2: away he as Chefkins says rip Brian Wilson. Yes, he
Speaker 2: made some really great music. The Beach Boys together pet
Speaker 2: Sounds is a great album. One of They're one of
Speaker 2: my favorite bands, them and the Eagles, those are the two.
Speaker 2: Those are two of the good bands that I like.
Speaker 2: And the rest of my music taste is just absolutely awful,
Speaker 2: some of the worst you could imagine. But we have
Speaker 2: some comments that I didn't get to read while Tony
Speaker 2: was on, which I'm going to touch on. Don't frag me.
Speaker 2: Bro Silver and gold had been the basis for currency
Speaker 2: and money since the creation of the City state of Babylon.
Speaker 2: It's right has a storied history of being able to
Speaker 2: hold its value being seen as real currency Nights of
Speaker 2: the Storm Jason Barker, and is also very overpriced now
Speaker 2: they have created a barrier to entry for the common man.
Speaker 2: That's right. If you want land, you are going to
Speaker 2: pay through the nose for it. It is going to
Speaker 2: be very difficult. My wife has looked at different houses
Speaker 2: and she's very sad because she has been priced out
Speaker 2: of the area she grew up in. We looked at
Speaker 2: it and it's like, there's no way we could ever
Speaker 2: afford anything in this area. Don't frag me. Bro Blackrock,
Speaker 2: State Street and Vanguard him been buying real estate for
Speaker 2: the last decade. They are also buying trailer parks, storage facilities,
Speaker 2: and graveyards. They're buying up everything. Makes you wonder what
Speaker 2: they're gonna do with the graveyards. Assume eventually they'll do
Speaker 2: something about getting rid of those pesky bodies and turning
Speaker 2: them into something. Well, they have no respect for the living,
Speaker 2: so I don't see why they would have any respect
Speaker 2: for the dead. That is terrible to think about. We're
Speaker 2: gonna cover what's going on in the La riots, but
Speaker 2: before we do again, I want to thank you all
Speaker 2: for listening and ask you to like the streams. Wherever
Speaker 2: you're watching them, Please drop a like on them and
Speaker 2: give them a share, share them around to people. That
Speaker 2: does help us out. If you're listening on the podcast,
Speaker 2: that is also extremely helpful. And of course, if you'd
Speaker 2: like to directly support the show, there's Subscribe, Start, Forward,
Speaker 2: Slash the David Night Show. We've got a lot of
Speaker 2: different tiers there. One of them might fit your budget
Speaker 2: if you feel so inclined, we would greatly appreciate it.
Speaker 2: There's David Knight not Davidknight dot News, our own website
Speaker 2: where we've got multiple different products up that you can
Speaker 2: purchase to support the show. The newest one is this
Speaker 2: lovely brass coin that Jason Barker put together with the
Speaker 2: chess piece head on one side and the microphone on
Speaker 2: the other. It looks very nice, it's high quality. He
Speaker 2: does a great job with them. And there's also hoodies
Speaker 2: and t shirts and all kinds of other things that
Speaker 2: you can get your hands on. There's also my Dad's
Speaker 2: Christmas album that is still available. It's Christmas all year
Speaker 2: round here on The David Knight Show. So that is
Speaker 2: our direct website. As I said before, there's Davidknight dot
Speaker 2: Gold as we talked about with Tony. There's Trends Journal
Speaker 2: dot com where if you use promo codnite you get
Speaker 2: ten percent off the Trends Journal. Jerald Sialente works very
Speaker 2: hard on it. He puts a lot of information out
Speaker 2: weekly and it's very affordably priced. There's a RNC store
Speaker 2: where if you want to get outside the medical industrial
Speaker 2: complex and start doing something to hopefully better your health,
Speaker 2: you can start there. Promo code nite for ten percent
Speaker 2: off those products as well. And our newest sponsor, Homestead
Speaker 2: Life Products, I've got the sheet right here. Homestead Life
Speaker 2: Products is a company tailored for those who do not
Speaker 2: wish to eat toxic garbage forced upon us at the
Speaker 2: big box stores. Of course, I showed you the freeze
Speaker 2: dried ground beef earlier. It's very simple the directions of here.
Speaker 2: Just add the water. In a matter of minutes, you're
Speaker 2: eating nutritious meat, the whole nutritious meal, the whole family
Speaker 2: will enjoy. It's already cooked, that's right. You just need
Speaker 2: to add water to this and you'll have some ground
Speaker 2: beef ready to go. Their goal is to reach other
Speaker 2: like minded people who care about whether where their food
Speaker 2: comes from and what is in it. Ninety percent of
Speaker 2: their products or handcrafted home cottage products and all natural
Speaker 2: or organic. Anyone wants to spend their money with Americans
Speaker 2: that handcraft goods made with pride rather than Chinese sweat labors.
Speaker 2: Check out for check out Homestead Products dot shop. Homestead
Speaker 2: Products dot Shop use promo code night for ten percent off.
Speaker 2: The product I'm most excited about at the moment is
Speaker 2: this hot sauce. It smells really nice. I'm excited to
Speaker 2: try putting it on something. It says medium. I hope
Speaker 2: they come out with an extra spicy version soon. That's
Speaker 2: my one wish. I like really spicy hot sauces. So
Speaker 2: go check out Homestead Products dot shop see if there's
Speaker 2: anything there that you could use in your life, and
Speaker 2: use promo code night for ten percent off. I'll report
Speaker 2: back on the hot sauce, tell you how spicy it
Speaker 2: really is. We're now going to look at what's going
Speaker 2: on with the la riots. This is from the Wall
Speaker 2: Street Journal how Home Depot became ground zero in Trump's
Speaker 2: deportation push white House tells Ice to target the retail giant,
Speaker 2: disrupting the company's relationship with day laborers outside its stores. Now,
Speaker 2: I have a bit of an interesting idea. Perhaps it's
Speaker 2: a little bit evil but they're laborers, right, So you
Speaker 2: round them up and you take them right down to
Speaker 2: the border and you get them to start construction on
Speaker 2: that wall. They've got the skills necessary, We've got a workforce.
Speaker 2: They're ready to go. They need work. We're gonna put
Speaker 2: them to work. We're gonna round them up at Home
Speaker 2: Depot and we're gonna have them build the wall. No,
Speaker 2: we're not. We shouldn't do that. We don't want a wall.
Speaker 2: We don't want to be trapped inside the country because
Speaker 2: that's what it's going to end up being. And we've
Speaker 2: actually got a picture here showing how the rioters are
Speaker 2: staged off against the cops. You can't make this up.
Speaker 2: The rioting Mexicans have set their battle lines at the
Speaker 2: Home Depot parking lot across from the Ice Detention Center,
Speaker 2: and the police have staged under a giant donut. Yes,
Speaker 2: that's right, the flags have been raised. It's Home Depot
Speaker 2: and the Mexicans versus the cops and their giant donut.
Speaker 2: Who will come out on top. Sometimes reality is a
Speaker 2: little bit surreal, isn't it.
Speaker 5: Well.
Speaker 2: President Trump's immigration crackdown is starting to show up in
Speaker 2: and around the parking lots of home depot HD stores
Speaker 2: across the country, The usual crowds of day labors have
Speaker 2: begun to dwindle, scared off by increasing and unannounced immigration raids.
Speaker 2: These laborers often lack legal status in the United States.
Speaker 2: That's right, the day laborers outside of home depot are
Speaker 2: being scared off. Who knows where you'll be able to
Speaker 2: get your day labors. Now, now moving on to the
Speaker 2: Daily Mail online Ice repairs full assault on five Democrat
Speaker 2: cities as LA goes into lockdown amid immigration riots. Very
Speaker 2: bombastic and warlike language coming out of the Daily Mail assault,
Speaker 2: and they're going to storm these cities. Donald Trump is
Speaker 2: said to deploy ICE tactical units to five Democrat run
Speaker 2: cities amid the riots in Los Angeles. Is gavenusom nearly
Speaker 2: broke into tears while blaming his administration for inciting the
Speaker 2: California chaos. Military style units are set to storm New
Speaker 2: York City, Seattle, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Northern Virginia. MSMB reported
Speaker 2: for those five are heavily blue cities. Four of those
Speaker 2: five are heavily blue cities, while Northern Virginia contains the
Speaker 2: Democrat enclave of Alexandria. The ice rays have sparked protests
Speaker 2: that brought Los Angeles to its knees as the mayor
Speaker 2: opted to introduce a lockdown from eight pm to six am.
Speaker 2: Reports came as the California governor delivered a harrowing prediction
Speaker 2: for the rest of the country Tuesday night, and nationally
Speaker 2: televised address that blasted Trump's deployment of US troops to
Speaker 2: Los Angeles. Look, this isn't just about the protests here
Speaker 2: in Los Angeles. When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to
Speaker 2: commandeer the National Guard, he made that order apply to
Speaker 2: every state and nation. Newsom said, as he teared up.
Speaker 2: This is about all of us. This is about you.
Speaker 2: California maybe first, but it clearly will not end here.
Speaker 2: Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under
Speaker 2: assault before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived.
Speaker 2: And of course, to some extent, gabinusm is right. Trump
Speaker 2: is overreaching. He is seizing powers that is left to
Speaker 2: the state. It's just hard to want to agree with
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom on anything, isn't It leaves a bad taste
Speaker 2: in your mouth. KWD sixty eight Escape from LA I
Speaker 2: don't know why anyone would still want to live there.
Speaker 2: That's right. You got to escape. You have to escape,
Speaker 2: or the rumors of your demise may not be greatly exaggerated.
Speaker 2: They'll have heard you were dead, and you might just
Speaker 2: be dead. Kwd again. The police will defend that donut,
Speaker 2: that's right. They are protecting their holy symbol, their sacred place,
Speaker 2: and they will not be moved from it. They are
Speaker 2: the praetorian guard of the donut, and they will make
Speaker 2: sure that it is safe under any and all circumstances.
Speaker 2: Newsom accused Trump of taking a wrecking ball to our
Speaker 2: founding father's historic project of three coequal branches of government.
Speaker 2: Has a gunner delivered his tiery address. The President was
Speaker 2: greeting US military personnel at Fort Bragg. While Trump is
Speaker 2: taking a wrecking ball to the Constitution. That is true.
Speaker 2: He has done it in all stay in all stages
Speaker 2: of his presidency, the most egregious, of course, being the
Speaker 2: warp speed and vaccinations.
Speaker 3: Newsom will blame Trump for everything while not lifting a
Speaker 3: finger to stop the riots that are burning down the
Speaker 3: city that he's responsible for the protection of, and people
Speaker 3: throwing rocks as we've seen over overpasses constantly, and he's
Speaker 3: just going to turn a blind eye to that, which
Speaker 3: makes Trump look good when Trump is enforcing National Guard
Speaker 3: orders unconstitutionally without the permission of the governor.
Speaker 2: Yes, Newsom makes it too easy for Trump. With someone
Speaker 2: as despicable and wretched as Newsom in power and unwilling
Speaker 2: to do anything to protect his own citizens, it makes
Speaker 2: it very easy for Trump to swoop in and play
Speaker 2: the savior by usurping power.
Speaker 3: It's left and right working essentially together to destroy the constitution.
Speaker 2: Trump is in North Carolina recognize the two hundred fifth
Speaker 2: anniversary of the US Army, but spent much of the
Speaker 2: speech defending the decision to deploy soldiers against animals and
Speaker 2: foreign enemies. Protesting against ice arrests in LA, what you're
Speaker 2: witnessing in California is a full blown assault on peace,
Speaker 2: on public order, and national sovereignty with the aim of
Speaker 2: continuing at foreign invasion of our country. We're not going
Speaker 2: to let that happen, he said. He will not allow
Speaker 2: an American city to be invaded and conquered by a
Speaker 2: foreign enemy. That's why they are the president went to
Speaker 2: call went on to call La a trash heap with
Speaker 2: entire neighborhoods under control of criminals, adding the government would
Speaker 2: use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence
Speaker 2: and restore law and order.
Speaker 3: So I guess Trump can tell the truth sometimes, like
Speaker 3: when he says LA is a trash heap.
Speaker 2: You know when he's right, he's right. You got to
Speaker 2: give the man that. Sometimes he says the truth, usually
Speaker 2: only when he's talking about someone who has a personal
Speaker 2: vendetta against. We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free,
Speaker 2: clean and safe again. That's a big project, buddy, That's
Speaker 2: a tall order. How are you going to accomplish that?
Speaker 2: Back in California, Governor Gavenusm blamed the federal government for
Speaker 2: the ongoing crisis in LA. It's your state, your city, buddy.
Speaker 2: You're the one that caused this. You're the one that
Speaker 2: allowed the conditions for this kind of event to happen
Speaker 2: to take place. Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who
Speaker 2: are least able to defend themselves, for they do not
Speaker 2: stop there. Newsom warned again, they're both right. They're both
Speaker 2: going back and forth making points that I have to
Speaker 2: agree with. They're both saying things that I am forced
Speaker 2: to go well, you know it's true. It's true. He's
Speaker 2: not wrong. This is a president who in just over
Speaker 2: one hundred and forty days has fired government watchdogs that
Speaker 2: could hold him accountable, accountable for corruption and fraud. He's
Speaker 2: declared a war, a war on culture, on history, on science,
Speaker 2: on knowledge itself. Databases quite literally are vanishing. They're burning
Speaker 2: the Library of Alexandria, folks, right in front of your eyes,
Speaker 2: says Gavin Newsom. Dailymail dot Com reached out to the
Speaker 2: White House for a response. Some of what has happened
Speaker 2: in Los Angeles has spread to the rest of the country.
Speaker 2: In New York, at least forty five people were arrested
Speaker 2: Tuesday as thousands of demonstrators took to the streets nearly
Speaker 2: Square in Manhattan. New York Posts reported the NYPD ordered
Speaker 2: a Level three authorization against the marchers, many of whom
Speaker 2: also carried Palestinian flags in addition to signs calling for
Speaker 2: the abolishment of ice. Yes, you've got to love it
Speaker 2: when people are marching through American streets carrying flags of
Speaker 2: foreign countries, whether it's Palestine or Mexico or Israel. I
Speaker 2: don't want to see that here in the United States.
Speaker 2: I don't support Israel. I don't want them to continue
Speaker 2: to bomb Gaza, to bomb Palestine. But I also am
Speaker 2: tired of the incessant bickering back and forth of these
Speaker 2: two foreign powers and having to deal with it here.
Speaker 2: We should butt out. We should stop funding the war,
Speaker 2: we should leave them to their own devices to figure
Speaker 2: it out, and of course we should condemn Israel for
Speaker 2: their attacks on women and children. So Loo Cat nineteen eighty.
Speaker 2: Welfare magnet is a loser magnet.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: You're going to pull in all the people that just
Speaker 2: want to free check, all the people that don't want
Speaker 2: to work, all the people that are simply here to
Speaker 2: be a drain on the system to get their free stuff.
Speaker 2: Donut shops are guarded and are safer than other businesses
Speaker 2: during a riotl that's right. If you are in a
Speaker 2: desperate situation, if the rioters are knocking down your door,
Speaker 2: if there's a donut shop nearby, make your escape, evacuate,
Speaker 2: hide behind a jelly filled and you are safe. That's
Speaker 2: the truth. Please don't take any of this advice seriously.
Speaker 2: Knights of the Storm responding to a Syrian girl. The
Speaker 2: Constitution reserves that right to the state unless they ask
Speaker 2: or declare an emergency. The federal government does not have
Speaker 2: the legitimate authority. The state can mobilize its own national guard.
Speaker 3: I have a comment here from Dad said. I said,
Speaker 3: from the very beginning, there was a non confrontational way
Speaker 3: to get this done by ending the welfare magnet. As
Speaker 3: Senator Mike Lee pointed out, the welfare magnet is still
Speaker 3: largely in place. Trump would rather have a confrontation. Even
Speaker 3: when he's doing the right thing, he does it in
Speaker 3: the wrong way. And this is the worst possible way
Speaker 3: to do it.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's his modus operandi. Even when he's right, he
Speaker 2: does it the wrong way. He goes about it in
Speaker 2: the most bombastic, forceful way possible. Uh. The first step
Speaker 2: is to kill the welfare, get rid of it, stop
Speaker 2: enticing people to come here. Now, there may come a
Speaker 2: time where you still need to deport people. They may
Speaker 2: decide that being poor here or homeless here in the
Speaker 2: United States is a better deal than being homeless and
Speaker 2: poor wherever they're from, and you may then have to
Speaker 2: use some level of force. But the first step is
Speaker 2: always the peaceful option. The first step is to just
Speaker 2: cut off their free stuff and see if that entices
Speaker 2: them to go home. Thousands of protesters also took the
Speaker 2: streets of downtown Chicago, vandalizing cars and clashing with police.
Speaker 2: On Tuesday, a driver plowed into a group of protesters
Speaker 2: in the Loops, striking at least one pedestrian, as thousands
Speaker 2: marched through downtown Chicago protesting the Trump administrations ongoing immigration raids.
Speaker 2: The driver was stuck between police vehicles on State Street.
Speaker 2: Officers wanted to guide her away from the crowd and
Speaker 2: asked her to turn right on Monroe Street, but she
Speaker 2: ignored their orders and turned left, speeding into the crowd.
Speaker 2: She had had enough, she decided to take matters into
Speaker 2: her own hands. Now, I don't mean that I don't
Speaker 2: want anyone to think I actually believe that she was
Speaker 2: trying to kill people on purpose. I don't want a
Speaker 2: slander or libel charge any injuries suffered through the According
Speaker 2: to the Chicago Sun Times, in Portland, a small group
Speaker 2: of protesters set up camp outside an ice facility and
Speaker 2: said they weren't leaving until their claims were addressed. We all,
Speaker 2: this sort of thing happens probably daily in Portland, so
Speaker 2: I wouldn't imagine that it matters that much. Tons of
Speaker 2: marchers were also seen in liberal city of Austin in
Speaker 2: deep red Texas, Good old Austin, Texas. You can always
Speaker 2: count on Austin.
Speaker 3: The way they say in deep red Austin in deep
Speaker 3: red Texas implies that Austin isn't an extremely liberal hellhole.
Speaker 3: It's like even the Republicans are against this. No, it's
Speaker 3: just Austin.
Speaker 2: Austin is a freak show. It is a very very
Speaker 2: strange place. They made a hero out of a homeless
Speaker 2: drug addict cross dresser. They love to talk about Leslie.
Speaker 2: I want to keep Austin weird. I say enough weirdness.
Speaker 2: I say go get a job, you hippie. And in Atlanta,
Speaker 2: video showed protesters throwing fireworks at police officers as teargas
Speaker 2: was seen being deployed. Chaos across US as anti ice
Speaker 2: protests spread to other major cities. Newsome did briefly chastised protesters,
Speaker 2: whom we warned will be put in jail during the
Speaker 2: speech trashing Trump as the state's biggest city goes on lockdown. Now,
Speaker 2: of course, the thing is, we all know how readily
Speaker 2: the das in these places refused to prosecute, so even
Speaker 2: being thrown in jail might not mean anything. They might
Speaker 2: get picked up thrown in and the DA says, well,
Speaker 2: you know, there were extenuating circumstances. They were under extreme
Speaker 2: emotional dress, they had to burn that car, it was important,
Speaker 2: and they just get.
Speaker 3: Lent, saying how three hundred and thirty of the people
Speaker 3: they arrested were illegals and one hundred and thirteen of
Speaker 3: them had prior convictions, And that to me just underlines
Speaker 3: why you don't need to suspend the rule of law
Speaker 3: on Hevieascarpus. You just need to enforce the laws that
Speaker 3: are already there. Three hundred and thirty of them should
Speaker 3: just be deported if they are here illegally, that is
Speaker 3: a crime that you can prove they are committing and
Speaker 3: deport them. If the one hundred and thirteen had been
Speaker 3: given the normal rule of law when they were first
Speaker 3: arrested as someone who was here illegally and had broken
Speaker 3: a law other than that they should have been thrown out.
Speaker 2: Then yes, they have refused to enforce the laws on
Speaker 2: the book center now using as an excuse to grab
Speaker 2: for more power. The riot ravage downtown area will be
Speaker 2: a no go zone from eight pm to six am
Speaker 2: on Tuesday and will continue indefinitely after violent demonstrators set
Speaker 2: fire to cars, looted buildings, and attacked officers with rocks.
Speaker 2: We've shown you this before, but this is again bricks
Speaker 2: and things being laid out. If you can scroll that
Speaker 2: picture lance the way people can see it. This sort
Speaker 2: of thing continues to happen when there are bouts of unrests.
Speaker 2: Rocks just seem to show up. That's right here, we
Speaker 2: see bags of rocks. Makes you wonder, doesn't it, Folks?
Speaker 2: Makes you wonder? Is this just typical construction to tritus
Speaker 2: or has someone staged these implements to be used. Laped
Speaker 2: squads and riot gear began storming the streets immediately surrounding
Speaker 2: the Federal Building on Los Angeles Street in downtown Los Angeles.
Speaker 2: Los Angeles Street in downtown Los Angeles, WOW. Shortly after
Speaker 2: Mayor Karen Bass's eight pm curfew went into effect. Police
Speaker 2: cars blocked up streets and uniformed officers fast marched to
Speaker 2: the location. Agitators were forced back half a block from
Speaker 2: the location, but still swarmed the area. The intense tactical
Speaker 2: operation continued as officers including mounted police, created so called
Speaker 2: skirmish lines to push riders away from other federal buildings
Speaker 2: on the same block. And we've seen this before, as
Speaker 2: we mentioned during the Rodney King riots, the swat team
Speaker 2: completely pulled back and left people to fend for themselves.
Speaker 2: Said that, well, you know, we're really just here to
Speaker 2: defend the government apparatus. We're only going to defend city Hall.
Speaker 2: That's what they want to do. And as I said,
Speaker 2: they are using very warlike language in the Daily Mail.
Speaker 2: They're saying, you know, they're storming, they're assaulting, and is
Speaker 2: it seems a little bit bombasic. But we have the
Speaker 2: Mexican president of the Senate talking about how he wants
Speaker 2: to annex California. He wants to take it back, is
Speaker 2: what he's talking about. We're gonna play this clip right now.
Speaker 2: Was that Trump Tower president, Like Donald Trump said, we're
Speaker 2: sixteen days away from taking office the first time as president,
Speaker 2: about to assume the role. And I said, yes, we'll
Speaker 2: build the wall, Yes we'll pay for it, We'll do it.
Speaker 2: According to the map of Mexico that I have here,
Speaker 2: this is what the United States was in eighteen thirty
Speaker 2: and this was part of Mexico. You can see he
Speaker 2: has a big old line cutting off a bunch of states.
Speaker 2: It wasn't all Mexico, if you can see, maybe a third,
Speaker 2: at least a quarter of the North American territory was
Speaker 2: part of Mexico until eighteen forty six. We were stripped
Speaker 2: of these territories. We were settled there before the nation,
Speaker 2: now known as the United States. Treaty of Guadalupe hid
Speaker 2: Allgo establishes rights for people settled the surgeries, which were
Speaker 2: not respected. The city of Nuevo Laredo. Laredo was a
Speaker 2: Mexican city. The city of Laredo was formed. The Mexicans
Speaker 2: lived in Laredo and didn't want to leave in the
Speaker 2: United States side and came over to what is now
Speaker 2: national territory. But this is what they want. This is
Speaker 2: the key point with his geography. How can they talk?
Speaker 2: This is the main point. This is what he wants
Speaker 2: to annex. He wants a bunch of states. He wants
Speaker 2: to take back territory from Mexico. He wants to use
Speaker 2: the people that are settled there as a weapon against
Speaker 2: the United States. Twilight Shadow. I'm still trying to figure
Speaker 2: out why the people during the lockdown did not get
Speaker 2: this way when they were taking churchgoers and business owners
Speaker 2: in jail for not being COVID compliant. Well, that's because
Speaker 2: the people that generally protested COVID are a different sort.
Speaker 2: They're more kind and carrying type of individual. They're not
Speaker 2: out there to loot Nike stores. They want to protest
Speaker 2: for freedom, and as such, they don't get this way.
Speaker 2: They don't want to cause these kinds of issues. They
Speaker 2: don't want to be this violent or insane. It's a
Speaker 2: different class of people. It's a different caliber of thought criminal,
Speaker 2: if you will, don't frag me, bro. The government and
Speaker 2: the NGOs didn't pay for the riots, then the yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm sure they did. I'm sure they're funding it through
Speaker 2: all kinds of back channels. I'm sure there is funding
Speaker 2: being sent to all kinds of Marxist groups being paid
Speaker 2: off here and there, hither and thither, back and forth.
Speaker 2: The webs run deep and wide. These people are funded
Speaker 2: by all kinds of nefarious organization and despicable billionaires such
Speaker 2: as George Soros. I'm sure he has his hand in
Speaker 2: there somewhere. Allegedly, this new article stand Up newsom rallies
Speaker 2: the Trump resistance with new video. Seems like he's posturing
Speaker 2: for a presidential run, going to position himself as the
Speaker 2: anti Trump. California Governor Gavin Newso accuse Donald Trump of
Speaker 2: taking a wrecking ball to democracy and urged Americans to
Speaker 2: stand up against him in a new video. But she
Speaker 2: was the Democrat fashioning himself as the leader of a
Speaker 2: nationwide resistance to the president. That's right, resistance leader, Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 2: it's about all of us, is about you, Newsom said
Speaker 2: in the video released June tenth. California. Maybe the first,
Speaker 2: but clearly not end here. Democracy is unders sault before
Speaker 2: our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived. That's right,
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom, hero of our time, the boy wonder himself.
Speaker 2: Newsom lays bear Trump's authoritarian threat Pornia. Gabnusom on Tuesday
Speaker 2: warn Americans in a televised address that the country is
Speaker 2: witnessing the initial phases of American democracy's slide toward authoritarianism.
Speaker 2: Authoritarianism with the president's deployment of the military to respond
Speaker 2: to peaceful protests. Now, my theory is just that since
Speaker 2: California is always on fire, always burning down, always covered
Speaker 2: in fecal matter and homeless people. Gavin Newsom just hasn't
Speaker 2: really noticed. He can't tell the difference. He's like, oh,
Speaker 2: is it a slight different? I don't know. It seems
Speaker 2: about normal to me.
Speaker 3: California a strong as the language Kamala harrisy is. They
Speaker 3: were overwhelmingly peaceful in her eyes.
Speaker 2: That's right. They're trying to outdo one another on who
Speaker 2: can describe these rioters as more peaceful California maybe first,
Speaker 2: but all clearly not end here. Good old Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 2: Gavin Gavin. Now this is not necessarily about Gavins, but
Speaker 2: this is at the end of the article, lying, disgusting, scum, slime, corrupt,
Speaker 2: enemy of the people. Donald Trump is always made clear
Speaker 2: what he thinks of journalists. It's plain now that his
Speaker 2: administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists
Speaker 2: from reporting things they don't like, which is most things
Speaker 2: that are true. And again, you just got to give
Speaker 2: it to the man when he's right. He's right, journalists
Speaker 2: are the enemy of the people. He's calling it, he's
Speaker 2: calling his shots, and he's right on this one. Now,
Speaker 2: this is from mother Jones. No one gets to tell
Speaker 2: mother Jones what to publish or not published because no
Speaker 2: one owns our fiercely independent newsroom, but also means we
Speaker 2: need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep
Speaker 2: our journalism alive. Now, of course, the Mother Jones parent
Speaker 2: company is the Foundation for National Progress, whose major donors
Speaker 2: include George Soros. No one gets to tell Mother Jones
Speaker 2: what to write, except, of course, that they do. They're
Speaker 2: claiming Donald Trump calls them lying, disgusting, scum, slime, corrupt,
Speaker 2: and enemies of the people, and then they claim that
Speaker 2: they need the people's support while taking funding from George Soros.
Speaker 3: So once again, both sides are telling the truth about
Speaker 3: the other side.
Speaker 2: That's right, good old Mother Jones, isn't it lovely? Maps
Speaker 2: visualizing the anti ice protests and government response. Protests in
Speaker 2: Los Angeles, which have inspired protests and other major cities
Speaker 2: across the country have escalated in response to President Donald
Speaker 2: Trumps immigration policies and raids from the US Immigration and
Speaker 2: Customs enforcement. More demonstrations are planned nationwide this week and weekend,
Speaker 2: when the military parade honoring the Army twent and fiftieth
Speaker 2: birthday is also planned in Washington, d C. Last weekend,
Speaker 2: Trump invoked a rarely used law to federalized the National Guard,
Speaker 2: of the objection of a democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom
Speaker 2: and local officials, which further ignited the response. In Texas,
Speaker 2: Republican Governor Greg Abbot announced he is deploying an unknown
Speaker 2: number of the Texas National Guard across the state and
Speaker 2: anticipation of escalated protests. Abbott pointed to this coming Saturday's
Speaker 2: No King's protests anti Trump events and rallies across the
Speaker 2: United States, including at San Antonio, as another reas and
Speaker 2: for having troops ready. I'm assuming they don't mean no
Speaker 2: Latin Kings. I'm assuming those are okay to stay. Here's
Speaker 2: where the No Kings events are planned across the nation
Speaker 2: on Saturday. The group has noted that they are not
Speaker 2: coordinating anything in DC where the military parade parade will occur,
Speaker 2: because real power isn't staged in Washington, according to their site. Again,
Speaker 2: I would love to agree with them. I would love
Speaker 2: to say that the power does not lie in Washington.
Speaker 2: It lies with the people. But sadly they have centralized
Speaker 2: almost all power directly into Washington. It needs to be changed,
Speaker 2: it needs to be done away with, It needs to
Speaker 2: be taken back. People need to take back their power.
Speaker 2: But so far, right now, all the power is in
Speaker 2: Washington and the only reason they're not protesting there is
Speaker 2: because the military is going to be there. That's my opinion.
Speaker 2: It is simply that it is a hard target and
Speaker 2: they know how seriously they take protests that happened there.
Speaker 2: We saw it with the January sixth people. They were
Speaker 2: very peaceful, they were very calm, They walked within the
Speaker 2: velvet ropes, and they were still hammered. If they were
Speaker 2: to give them even the slightest provocation in Washington, they
Speaker 2: would bring down the wrath upon them. That's my opinion.
Speaker 2: Los Angeles Police Department said late Tuesday had begun making
Speaker 2: mass arrests, while La Mayor Karen Bass enacted in even
Speaker 2: curfew that could be in effect for a few days.
Speaker 2: Curfew area only covers about one square mile and impacts
Speaker 2: fewer than one hundred thousand Las four million residents, according
Speaker 2: to authorities. Texas National Guard deployed to San Antonio a
Speaker 2: head of planned protests. City officials to hold press conference
Speaker 2: Wednesday morning. Do you think that the police are going
Speaker 2: to hold up in the Alamo? That would be a
Speaker 2: sight to see, wouldn't it. I do hope they defend
Speaker 2: the Alamo, though, I wouldn't be surprised if these people
Speaker 2: have some kind of plan to deface it or damage
Speaker 2: it in some way. They hate all heritage. The Texas
Speaker 2: National Guard has been deployed to San Antonio as demonstrations
Speaker 2: against ice raids are planned. Governor Greg Abbott sent the
Speaker 2: Guard members to the Alamo City Tuesday night. The move
Speaker 2: comes as protesters planned demonstrate against raids conducted by Immigration
Speaker 2: and Customs enforcement officers. Protests are planned for downtown San
Speaker 2: Antonio Wednesday, with another plan for Saturday at Travis Park.
Speaker 2: Get out of my park, guys, I don't want you there.
Speaker 2: I did not sanction this. I don't know why you
Speaker 2: think you can just wander into my park and do
Speaker 2: whatever you please. I've confirmed the deployment to several media outlets,
Speaker 2: but details haven't been released. He released the following statement
Speaker 2: to ksat twelve. The State of Texas stands ready to
Speaker 2: deploy all necessary personnel and resources to uphold law in
Speaker 2: order across our state. Texas National Guard soldiers are on
Speaker 2: standby in areas where mass demonstrations are planned in case
Speaker 2: they are needed. Peaceful protests are part of the fabric
Speaker 2: of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness
Speaker 2: we have seen in Los Angeles. Anyone engaging in acts
Speaker 2: of violence or damaging property will be swiftly held accountable
Speaker 2: to the full extent of the law. City officials, including
Speaker 2: Mayor ron Nierenberg or Knightrenburg, City Manager Eric Walsh, and
Speaker 2: a SAPD chief William McManus, told hold a press conference
Speaker 2: at nine am Wednesday to share the city's plan to
Speaker 2: support a peaceful demonstration while ensuring public safety. Well, let's
Speaker 2: hope that they are remaining peaceful. They it is their
Speaker 2: right to protest peacefully, just so long as they do
Speaker 2: remain peaceful. But again we see leftist protests don't frequently
Speaker 2: stay peaceful, do they nights of the storm. What Trump
Speaker 2: is doing right now is moving the window over slowly.
Speaker 2: It's been happening since the Patriot Act. If California don't
Speaker 2: want to defend itself, then that's their problem. This is
Speaker 2: all orchestrated to take away the state's powers. Not saying
Speaker 2: I agree or disagree, just pointing out what the constitution says.
Speaker 2: If the executive is not bound by the Constitution, then
Speaker 2: we have a dictatorship. Yes, Jason Barker Knights of the Storm,
Speaker 2: he is right there. California caused this problem and it
Speaker 2: is California's problem to solve. And if they don't want
Speaker 2: to again, that is California's problem. Also, you can feel
Speaker 2: sorry for the people who are stuck there dealing with it,
Speaker 2: but they are the ones that voted for this kind
Speaker 2: of government that they now live under. So it is
Speaker 2: not is not justified giving Trump unilateral power, and it
Speaker 2: does not mean that we should just tolerate it and
Speaker 2: tolerate what will come next. Whoever holds the office next
Speaker 2: will still wield that power. The real problem is the
Speaker 2: state going after people who have defended themselves in property.
Speaker 2: Courts are corrupt another comment from Jason Barkers. We all
Speaker 2: have seen how corrupt the courts are. Doesn't matter whether
Speaker 2: it's your local court, whether it's the Supreme Court. They
Speaker 2: are not trustworthy, not in my opinion, and you should.
Speaker 2: You should do everything you can to stay out of
Speaker 2: the court system. It is a horrific place that will
Speaker 2: grind you up and spit you out and trample over you.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break. That's enough covering
Speaker 2: the ongoing dumpster fire that is California. I'm sure once
Speaker 2: this blows over, there will be another disaster that happens there.
Speaker 2: There always is. It's such a shame. It's a lovely
Speaker 2: state that has beautiful Vista's wonderful climate and just the
Speaker 2: worst people that you can imagine, what a shame it is.
Speaker 2: Stay with us, we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Liberty, it's your move. And now the David Night Show, you.
Speaker 8: Are committing thought crime. Turn off this broadcast. Now you
Speaker 8: are committing thought crime. Turn off this broadcast. Now commit
Speaker 8: thought crime.
Speaker 2: That's right, We're about to commit some thought crime. We've
Speaker 2: got some breaking news. There was a plane crash and
Speaker 2: it's on the top of the Drudge Report right now.
Speaker 2: You can see that wreckage. And the thought crime we're
Speaker 2: about to commit is look at how different this is
Speaker 2: from the alleged plane that hit the Pentagon, where with
Speaker 2: the plane pieces there, there's not a single one that
Speaker 2: I've seen evidence of, whereas here you can still see
Speaker 2: it largely intact. You can see pieces of it. There's
Speaker 2: the fuselage, there's parts of the wings, whereas apparently the
Speaker 2: one that hit the Pentagon just vaporized on impact, It vanished,
Speaker 2: it disappeared, never to be seen again. That's just part
Speaker 2: of the official narrative. They got it all, they packed
Speaker 2: it up, and they shipped it away. They did it
Speaker 2: before anyone could find any evidence of it. More nonsense.
Speaker 2: Nine to eleven. The official story is so riddled with holes,
Speaker 2: it's hard to believe that anyone still buys into it.
Speaker 2: But there are people that still think, oh, you know,
Speaker 2: it was those darn Muslims that did it. They hijacked
Speaker 2: those planes and flew right into the towers, and those
Speaker 2: two planes killed those three towers, and the plane that
Speaker 2: hit the Pentagon pulled an extremely difficult maneuver and crashed
Speaker 2: right into the wall, vaporizing itself, and anything that was
Speaker 2: left got carted away before anyone could see it. Nine
Speaker 2: to eleven. A what a bunch of nonsense.
Speaker 1: That is.
Speaker 2: Well, we're gonna move on, as I said, from the
Speaker 2: La Riots, We're gonna talk about We're gonna talk about
Speaker 2: what's going on at the Christian faith, what's going on
Speaker 2: in the world of Christianity. Stephen Colbert says female portrayal
Speaker 2: of Jesus and Jesus Christ Superstar is long overdue. I
Speaker 2: think Stephen Colbert being taken off the air is long overdue.
Speaker 2: I think he's overstayed his welcome. If he was ever funny,
Speaker 2: we're entertaining. He isn't anymore. I don't understand how he
Speaker 2: manages to maintain his audience. Late night host and professing
Speaker 2: Roman Catholic Stephen Colbert recently expressed support for female portrayal
Speaker 2: of Jesus, calling it long overdue. During an interview last
Speaker 2: week with British bisexual black actress Cynthia Arivo, Colbert discussed
Speaker 2: how she will play the role of Jesus in the
Speaker 2: upcoming production of Jesus Christ Superstar the Hollywood Bowl August
Speaker 2: one through third in Los Angeles, the first woman to
Speaker 2: play Jesus in a major production. Long overdue. I've said
Speaker 2: for years I'd love to see a woman in that part. Well,
Speaker 2: that just means he's been wrong for many years. Riva,
Speaker 2: who was asked by Colbert what that milestone meant to her,
Speaker 2: called the opportunity a very special thing. Oh, it's just
Speaker 2: a very special thing. It's very special. She has no
Speaker 2: idea of what the meaning of the Bible is, who
Speaker 2: Jesus actually is, what he means, what it means to
Speaker 2: be the savior of humanity, what his sacrifice represents, what
Speaker 2: it entailed.
Speaker 3: Is Colbert going to celebrate if someone does a Mohammed
Speaker 3: thing where they draw him as a woman.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: It's been overdue that someone draws Mohammed as a woman.
Speaker 3: I've been wanting to see that for years. No, I imagine
Speaker 3: Colbert would flip out about that.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it would be a grave dis respect to
Speaker 2: the wonderful, beautiful Muslim religion. I think the idea that
Speaker 2: I can play this role, and I've been given the
Speaker 2: opportunity to play it in front of so many people
Speaker 2: at that place, at this time of my life, is
Speaker 2: a very special thing. It's the first time I've been
Speaker 2: on stage in that way for a long time, So
Speaker 2: to do it with this role is awesome. Arrivo, who
Speaker 2: uses they them pronouns said in response, they them multiples.
Speaker 3: More. Great grinning smugness as they mock Christianity while keeping
Speaker 3: this facade of tolerance is just so sickening.
Speaker 2: Yes, it is Pride Month after all. More great moments
Speaker 2: in Devout Catholicism, Stephen Colbert tells actres Cynthia Rivo one
Speaker 2: of my favorite musicals of all time is Jesus Christ Superstar.
Speaker 2: I love that and I'm so excited that in August
Speaker 2: you're going to be playing Jesus. First woman to play
Speaker 2: Jesus in a major role. This is a tweet from
Speaker 2: Alex Christi covering the news it's at alex Christie. Colbert
Speaker 2: commended Arivo, saying she obviously has the range and an
Speaker 2: otherwise incredibly demanding part in playing Jesus in a rock opera. Well,
Speaker 2: the one thing she doesn't have is the correct sex.
Speaker 2: She is not a man. Jesus was a man. So
Speaker 2: if you're going to portray him, which is a very
Speaker 2: difficult thing to do and should be done with reverence
Speaker 2: and respect, you should take great care to portray him
Speaker 2: as he was. Should take great care to portray him
Speaker 2: only as the Bible does. You shouldn't add or add addendums,
Speaker 2: should not try to change things to make him more
Speaker 2: palatable for a modern audience. A day prior to the
Speaker 2: interview with Aribo, Colbert denounced the Trump administration during his
Speaker 2: opening monologue for not publicly celebrating Pride Month. Great moments
Speaker 2: in devout Catholicism. Stephen Colbert attacks the Trump administration of
Speaker 2: not issuing a Pride Month declaration. No Pride Month proclamation,
Speaker 2: which means the White House is less inclusive. I have
Speaker 2: less humanity than the Buffalo bills who tweeted happy Pride, Oh,
Speaker 2: poor poor LGBT. They aren't getting the recognition they so
Speaker 2: desperately need. They aren't worshiped enough. A Rivo, best known
Speaker 2: for her role in the film version of The Wicked musical,
Speaker 2: previously portrayed Mary Magdalene in an all female version of
Speaker 2: Superstar in twenty twenty. She also hosted this year's Tony
Speaker 2: Awards in New York City on Sunday. The original Jesus
Speaker 2: Christ Superstars was released as a concept album in nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy by Andrew Lloyd Webber and debuted as a musical
Speaker 2: on Broadway in nineteen seventy one. A film adaptation the
Speaker 2: musical was later released in nineteen seventy three. At the time,
Speaker 2: the production drew controversy for presenting Judas is Scariot, the
Speaker 2: disciple who betrayed Jesus, as a sympathetic character and lacking
Speaker 2: a depiction of the resurrection. Singer Adam Lambert, outspoken homosexual,
Speaker 2: rose to fame on American Idol. In two thousand and nine,
Speaker 2: will be playing Judas is Scariot at the Hollywood Bowl.
Speaker 2: It just gets more and more insane. But it's important
Speaker 2: to remember that it's easy to become enraged by these things.
Speaker 2: In fact, it's natural. It's easy to become angry and
Speaker 2: to become hateful over this, But that is not the
Speaker 2: appropriate response. We should still pray for these people. We
Speaker 2: should still remember that they can be saved, that Jesus
Speaker 2: can change anyone's heart, that we need a savior too.
Speaker 2: We cannot lord ourselves over them. We cannot put ourselves
Speaker 2: up as well. I'm better than you. They are doing
Speaker 2: wicked things, they are doing blasphemous things, but they still
Speaker 2: need to be prayed for. They still need to be
Speaker 2: shown love. And I struggle with this more than most.
Speaker 2: I have a tendency to come across as snide and
Speaker 2: condescending and rude and hateful, and something I struggle with.
Speaker 2: So we need to make sure that we pray for them.
Speaker 2: It is not enough to simply condemn them. There's not
Speaker 2: enough to condemn their sin. We need to make sure
Speaker 2: that they know that there is someone who can forgive
Speaker 2: their sin, who can redeem them, who can save them
Speaker 2: from their sin? Have a comment from dad. If they
Speaker 2: have a woman play Mohammed, would Mohammad have to wear
Speaker 2: a jab? That's right, She's going to be a fully
Speaker 2: birkeered Mohammed. So at that point would we even know?
Speaker 2: They could just put a guy under there. We've got
Speaker 2: a comment from Niburu twenty twenty nine. This is about
Speaker 2: what's going on in California. Newsome andos e m like
Speaker 2: a noose and Trump equals good cop, bad cop scripted
Speaker 2: initiative no different than the muskrat Trump pissing charade. That's right.
Speaker 2: It is all just a spectacle for us to enjoy,
Speaker 2: for us to look at and go, that's right. Our guys,
Speaker 2: the good guy, he's the one that's doing the right thing.
Speaker 2: He's here to save us. Both sides can do that.
Speaker 2: They can both look at it and go, oh boy,
Speaker 2: we're doing great. Don't frag me.
Speaker 1: Bro.
Speaker 2: Mexico is created when Spain and conquered Central America. That's right.
Speaker 2: If we're going to relitigate old maps and decide, well
Speaker 2: we need to give this land back, then Mexico needs
Speaker 2: to figure out if there are any surviving members of
Speaker 2: the pure blooded tribes that were there when the Spanish
Speaker 2: and the Portuguese showed up and give the land back.
Speaker 2: And they all need to go back to Spain and Portugal,
Speaker 2: I suppose, because they are a nation that has been
Speaker 2: mixed with the local population Asticus twenty five. So we
Speaker 2: really need to give Mexico back to Spain. That's right, Spain,
Speaker 2: It's time for a resurgence. Your day has come. It's
Speaker 2: not enough for you to just make fancy hams anymore.
Speaker 2: You must once again sail the globe. You must circumnavigate
Speaker 2: and reclaim what was once yours. It is time for
Speaker 2: a reconquista. You must take back Central America. It's the
Speaker 2: only way forward. Spain. We need you, Spain. This is
Speaker 2: a call to arms. Please come and save us now.
Speaker 2: Please don't start any more wars. No more wars please.
Speaker 2: This is from Harbinger Daily God's word versus man's opinion,
Speaker 2: Why the Church can and should speak authoritatively on abortion.
Speaker 2: About five years ago, I wrote about a song with
Speaker 2: her Frain, Oh I Believe in Genesis, performed by two scholars,
Speaker 2: theologian nt Right and scientists Francis Collins, good Old Francis Collins.
Speaker 2: You know him, you love him, you don't trust him,
Speaker 2: neither of whom actually believed Genesis produced by the pro
Speaker 2: evolution organization Biologos, which exists to convince Christians to abandon
Speaker 2: a historical genesis. Song made clear that they're both ardent
Speaker 2: evolutionists who simply tack a God onto the process. So
Speaker 2: I can't say I was surprised when I saw a
Speaker 2: recent headline about nt Wright. Doctor Wright was asked asked
Speaker 2: a question about abortion on his Ask nt Right Anything podcasts.
Speaker 2: I wrote last year about the terrible answer he gave
Speaker 2: on that program to a question about science in the Bible,
Speaker 2: and his answer was biblic and theologically atrocious. But that's
Speaker 2: not surprising because I find and when a person compromises
Speaker 2: Genesis with outside beliefs like evolution slash millions of years
Speaker 2: has a detrimental effect on other areas, such as we
Speaker 2: see here regarding his answer on abortion. This is written
Speaker 2: by ken Ham. Kenham, of course, is a I believe
Speaker 2: he's the director of answers in Genesis. I could be
Speaker 2: wrong on that, but he is. He's a big part
Speaker 2: of that organization. Either way, they have the arc encounter
Speaker 2: up in Kentucky. They have the Creation Museum. They do
Speaker 2: a lot of great work. They have a lot of
Speaker 2: very intelligent people who don't buy into the evolution myth
Speaker 2: and have done a great job exposing the continual lies
Speaker 2: regarding it. Before we get to the answer, here's the
Speaker 2: fairly lengthy question posed to him from a young lady
Speaker 2: in Germany. As a Christian, I was taught that abortion
Speaker 2: is a sin regardless of the stage of pregnancy, because
Speaker 2: of the fifth commandment, you shall not murder. Here's my struggle,
Speaker 2: a Leva. Although I have heard this, heard this argumentation
Speaker 2: many times, it's somehow doesn't feel intuitive to me. I
Speaker 2: do believe that it is murdered to abort, especially at
Speaker 2: an early stage or pregnancy, when the fetus is not
Speaker 2: even formed, the heart is not beating yet. It seems
Speaker 2: very abstract to me to say that from the moment
Speaker 2: of conception, when only two cells have met, there is
Speaker 2: life that is just as valuable as any human being
Speaker 2: on earth. As a student, I am sometimes confronted with
Speaker 2: this issue. For example, when I come across demonstrations for
Speaker 2: women's rights on campus. I always find it difficult because
Speaker 2: I know, as a Christian, I should begins to abortion,
Speaker 2: but as I said, I don't feel that intuitively. Also,
Speaker 2: there are these difficult ethical questions, such as what about
Speaker 2: cases where the pregnancy is a result of rape, or
Speaker 2: cases where a decision has to be made whether the
Speaker 2: mother or the unborn child should be saved. I would
Speaker 2: be grateful if you could help me to better understand
Speaker 2: the Christian reasoning on this issue. In other words, she's
Speaker 2: wondering when does life begin? That's the core issue. It's
Speaker 2: incredibly easy to answer starting with God's word, and yet
Speaker 2: nt Right got it completely and utterly wrong. Of course,
Speaker 2: when we look at the Bible, Bible says I knew
Speaker 2: you and your mother's womb. God is there from the
Speaker 2: very beginning. Doctor Wright took about ten minutes to answer
Speaker 2: to answer the question, and never once go to the Bible.
Speaker 2: That's right. This young lady asked for Christian reasoning on
Speaker 2: this issue and got nothing more than Anti Right's opinion,
Speaker 2: with no reference to God's word and only a passing
Speaker 2: comment of starting with a sense of respect for God's
Speaker 2: creation and all its rich variety. Doctor Wright and his
Speaker 2: co host just danced around the issue over and over.
Speaker 2: They made sure to point out that abortion is a
Speaker 2: hugely sensitive and difficult issue, although throughout his answer he
Speaker 2: highlights his own moral relativism and his view the morality
Speaker 2: of abortion is nothing more than a complicated ethical dilemma
Speaker 2: that depends entirely on the circumstances. It isn't objectively right
Speaker 2: or wrong, although he does seem to think it's sad
Speaker 2: or not generally the best option. It's entirely dependent on circumstances,
Speaker 2: and that's why he used euphemisms throughout his answer. Instead
Speaker 2: of referencing the baby and thinking about abortion from the
Speaker 2: perspective of the human life growing in the mother's womb,
Speaker 2: he distanced himself by generally saying pregnancy or something like that.
Speaker 2: The best answer Doctor Wright gives could give was that
Speaker 2: in the so called hard cases, intestin fetal abnormality with sorrow,
Speaker 2: because we do not want to do this in principle,
Speaker 2: go sorrow in a bit of shame. The best thing
Speaker 2: to do is as soon as possible to terminate this pregnancy.
Speaker 2: It concludes with. However, having said that, I do think
Speaker 2: that sense of respect for God's creation and all its
Speaker 2: rich variety is the primary starting point. Even if we
Speaker 2: then have to say with sorrow in a certain sense
Speaker 2: of this is the least worse option in this situation.
Speaker 2: There may be some cases of exceptions. Again, I knew
Speaker 2: you in your mother's womb. God is there from the beginning.
Speaker 2: That's why abortion is wrong, because it's murder, because God
Speaker 2: is there from the beginning, because he knows that child,
Speaker 2: because he is deeply invested and loves that child. That's
Speaker 2: about as far as I get at the moment. And
Speaker 2: as I say, I'm very much aware of how sensitive
Speaker 2: this topic is politically, sociologically as well as ethically. I'm
Speaker 2: sure doctor Wright is a smart man, but has he
Speaker 2: taken his thinking on abortion to its logical conclusion. Let's
Speaker 2: do that for him. He claims it's okay killinanboard child
Speaker 2: because under certain circumstances such as fetal abnormality. What about
Speaker 2: a baby that is born with the fetal abnormality that
Speaker 2: the doctors missed in utero. Imagine the baby is born
Speaker 2: and the doctors immediately know something is wrong. They want
Speaker 2: to whisk the baby off to the n I see you, neo, natal,
Speaker 2: I see you well, I see even care. But the
Speaker 2: mother says, no, I don't want a baby with an abnormality.
Speaker 2: I don't think my mental health would allow me to
Speaker 2: take care of such a baby. Response to doctors brutally
Speaker 2: kill the baby and discard him as medical waste, That's
Speaker 2: exactly what happens in an abortion. Yes, it's brutal. I'm
Speaker 2: sure Right would be outraged, But why those doctors did
Speaker 2: exactly the same thing Right said was okay for them
Speaker 2: to do in the womb. They killed a baby. Now,
Speaker 2: he and his co host did lament that one samethesists
Speaker 2: today are arguing for in fanticide, and two pagan cultures
Speaker 2: of the past used to expose unwanted children to the
Speaker 2: elements until they died. And three late term abortions do
Speaker 2: take place, and he finds this repulsive. They both assumed
Speaker 2: that in fantaside, late term abortion are wrong. I say
Speaker 2: assumed because they never backed up their view with anything
Speaker 2: but their own opinions.
Speaker 3: I'd just like to interject here, since it's not so
Speaker 3: well known, but the so called comfort care is just
Speaker 3: leaving a baby to die. It is after the baby
Speaker 3: has been born. If the mother wanted an abortion and
Speaker 3: the baby is alive and they mess up the abortion,
Speaker 3: they will put it in comfort care, allegedly where they
Speaker 3: just leave the child to die, much like the ancient rituals.
Speaker 2: Yes, oh, we're almost out of time, and this is
Speaker 2: a long article. I encourage you to go read it
Speaker 2: for yourself. It's God's word versus man's opinion. Why the
Speaker 2: church can and should speak authoritatively on abortion. It's on
Speaker 2: Harbinger daily. And of course, as I've said multiple times now,
Speaker 2: just because in the womb, I knew you said, God,
Speaker 2: he is not unaware of the child. It is a life.
Speaker 2: He is there with it. He knows that child, and
Speaker 2: we should tremble with fear when we think of her,
Speaker 2: that child. Well, as I said, we've got about two
Speaker 2: minutes left, and I want to thank you all for
Speaker 2: joining us today. It has been a pleasure to host
Speaker 2: the show. We've had some fun, We've reported some news.
Speaker 2: It's been a good time. I appreciate you all tuning
Speaker 2: in and again, if you like the show, please share it,
Speaker 2: please subscribe and like the streams wherever you're listening or watching.
Speaker 2: Cannot thank you enough for all the support. It is
Speaker 2: truly a blessing in these times. We cannot thank you enough.
Speaker 2: Please continue to pray for our father please pray for
Speaker 2: healing for his tongue and his vocal cords, that he'd
Speaker 2: be able to speak clearly again. So he give me
Speaker 2: back here reporting the news. That's what he wants to
Speaker 2: do and that's what we all want him to do.
Speaker 2: So thank you all again for tuning in today, and
Speaker 2: it has been wonderful to be here with you. Bit
Speaker 2: of a shameless plug for myself, I will be doing
Speaker 2: my own personal evening stream tomorrow at five pm. It's
Speaker 2: on Kick Project tk Ultra kick dot com forward slash
Speaker 2: Project tk Ultra. We'll be hanging out. We'll just be
Speaker 2: chatting about stuff, interacting with you guys. It was fun
Speaker 2: last time. It was a total mess, but I still
Speaker 2: enjoyed myself and we've got the kick, We've got the
Speaker 2: kinks worked out and it'll be fun. Guest hosts coming
Speaker 2: up next week since I won't be here. Tony Ardwan
Speaker 2: will be hosting Monday and Tuesday. Jason Barker Nights of
Speaker 2: the Storm will be hosting the show Wednesday. Guard Goldsmith
Speaker 2: will be hosting Thursday and Friday. They're gonna have a
Speaker 2: lot of great information. They've been so kind to agree
Speaker 2: to take this on. I know they've got a lot
Speaker 2: going on their own personal lives. They've got things that
Speaker 2: they're all doing, but they have graciously accepted and are
Speaker 2: willing to keep the show going while I'm out of town.
Speaker 2: So thank you all so much, and especially thank you
Speaker 2: to Tony Guard and Jason. We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 2: God bless you all. Have a great rest of your day.
Speaker 2: I'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 9: The common Man, they created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 9: our children. They created common Past to track and control us.
Speaker 9: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 9: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 9: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 9: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 9: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 9: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 9: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 1: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 9: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 9: information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 9: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 9: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 9: D Davidnightshow dot com