Speaker 1: All right, all right, welcome to Jay's analysis. Can everybody
hear me? Yes, this is Taylor Momson, And that's why
I put her image up is just because I thought
it would be funny to consider the fact that the
cult esoteric stuff is so out in the open that
it's not even it's not even hidden. So we're going
to talk about some of that, but we want to
go into actually the real stuff in the background that
brought all this to the fore. That's what we want
to look at. We don't want to do vision and
citizens style stuff. It's just an image I chose. Can
anyone hear me? Is this the right stream? Do I
have the right stream going? Sometimes you get these streams
mixed up and one stream is going in another's not.
So we've already got flat earth trolls spamming, flat earth
s thumbing down, and every one of those is getting deleted.
You took Tragy and Hope with you. I took Tragy
and help with me to the potty. Okay, but can
you guys on the Rockefeller Cia cultural Marxism stream hear me?
Is what I want to make sure because my skills
fuck up sometimes then I get a boomer mindset when
it comes to.
Speaker 2: Running these things. How the freak am I on the
wrong stream? I don't want two different freaking streams. So
there's only there's nine nerds on this stream. How did
I get the other stream going?
Speaker 1: Okay, I see what we're doing. Okay, so yeah, this
is the right stream. I just got to fix this here.
Oh my gosh, get these flat Earth faggots out of here,
trying to fuck up my ship on a Sunday. So
I mean, look at this. Okay, So I'm trying to
do this live stream and there are spams going crazy
of flat Earth's talking about this channel being fascist and
how many times do you have to delete this dude?
This dude is out of here. But that's what we
get with this kind of crap, all right, Anyway people
can figure out which one is the right. Good grief,
Here comes another. See this is what happens. This is
what happens. This has happened every six months you get
spam bought flat Earth channel. If that's not a clear
indicator that that shit is the stupidest freaking sy op
of all time, Here we go another one. This is
the fifth flat Earth spambot that's in here calling this
a Nazi channel. Now you want to know why the
I'm getting hit by the spambots. You're asking why there's
all these dislikes. If you look in the chat, this
happens every six months. Here's another one. This is seven
spambot twelve twelve. Now spambots attacking this channel. And I'm
trying to do a freaking live stream about real stuff.
And look, here you go. This shows you this flat
earth bullshit is nothing but a syop. Here are fifty
freaking fake profiles attacking as I'm trying to do my
real live stream. Oh my gosh, get the f out
of here, dude. So I don't even think these are real.
There's bots. So okay, seventy seven people good here all
of the thumbs down are the flat earth bots attacking?
Here we go. What they're saying, this is a fascist channel? Yeah,
this is a fascian I thought we were Russian agents.
Russians fought fascists, so it's kind of a stupid thing.
The Russians fought the naziason World War two. How is
this a fascist channel? They don't even know what fascism
is and these aren't real channels. So this has meant.
This shows you, by the way that I'm telling you
the truth, there wouldn't be fifty freaking spam bots in here. Yeah,
people are saying this is nuts. This is nuts because
I have had this happen to my channel multiple times.
When you see videos that when I load them up,
they immediately get fifty thumbs down, twenty thumbs down. It's
because of these freaking flat earth bots. That is that
are the stupidest things of all time. And how long
have I been saying that this is all much of
SI out bullshit. I've banned ten ten of them now
and they've already given me how many freaking thumbs down. Anyway,
hopefully they're going to stop. They're going to keep Yeah,
exactly attack of the flat bots. So you people can
see this now in live time. You guys have seen it.
I've mentioned it on many interviews. People thought I was
making this up. You this happens. This happens every six
months on my channel. The flat It's like Google has
some kind of algorithm or something where they run these
spots that go through or NSA or whoever does this,
you know. Cass Sunstein wrote about this in his paper
on conspiracy theories that they would use the the the
cognitive infiltration strategy of how to mess up all the
truth groups. And he wrote that, I wrote that. Read
that paper. It's really good. Actually, the whole paper is
about paradigms and world views, and in that paper he
talks about creating false conspiracies and movements using technology, etc.
To insert into all of the different types of meetup groups,
chat groups, message boards, YouTube videos, and to just annihilate
channels that deal with truth with just total retardation. Look
at this. This is like the fifteenth one. Now, look
at this. Look at the chat the fifteenth one. This
is my favorite fascist channel on YouTube. Tim Osman, tim Osman,
tim Osmond. And here's another one another another dude, all
you flat earth people, You people are the dumbest people
on Earth. I mean, I can't even there. I don't
have words for the stupidity of the flat earth people.
And I told you day one this was a total
sigh up. And we're not even here to talk about that.
But that's why they're doing this, is that this was
Look at this, this is crazy. You can't even keep
up with this. This is intended to fuck up my channel.
What the fuck does Tim Osman have to do. It
doesn't even make sense, and that shows you that it's
a bot. This is like an AI thing. That's why
there's no human being that could have fifty different profiles
spamming this flat earth bullshit. Yeah, no, I know that
it's obvious, but it's it's it's not fun to start
your stream here and you immediately have twenty thumbs down,
and that shows you that's fit. By the way I'm saying,
that shows you that this is good grief. Here we
go more more more so. They're going to take over
my chat today with this NSA bullshit, and yes, we
will ignore them, we're going to move on. But they're
intentionally messing up my chat. And they're doing that because
that means I won't get any super chat questions because
it's just going to be flooded with this bullshit the
whole time, and I can sit here and just delete
them the entire time. So there you go. Everybody sees
it firsthand. I've been banned for six months on Facebook
and now I'm getting the every six months attack of
the Flatler spambots. So let's move on past that. Maybe
that'll eventually quit look at this. They're not there's another one.
They're not even they're even makes sense. This happened to me.
This happens every freaking six months. They do this. I'm
not worried. Keep your head up now, I don't give
a shit. I mean, it's funny because it means this
is obviously one of the channels that's been flagged. Look
at this. This is insane. So if this video has
a million thumbs down and this is you'll know why.
Everybody who hears the beginning of this, it's because we
haven't even gotten started and there is all of these. Yeah,
I'm not trying to block, it's just that these are
coming in so fast. When I try to to block
the let me say if I can up the spam
filter here or something, because this is crazy, This is insane.
I can't keep up with these spambots, blocking them quick
enough to accidentally. Sometimes accidentally I block people that want
to make real questions. But anyway, so I guess they're
just not going to let me have an actual discussion. Yes,
we know that Tim Osmond was a CIA agent. Everybody
knows that, all right, So I've blocked about twenty of
these and I'm hoping that eventually it's gonna just kind
of quit, but I don't think so. It's not easy
to catch it because as soon as you try to
click from the board to block these that there's already
like twenty more. So anyway, I'm done with that. I
can't keep up with it. Let's move on now. I
said we would talk about globalist books, and somebody this
week reminded me of a globalist book that I had
forgotten about, and I did read it many years ago,
and that's the stupid book Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson,
Tird Ferguson's analysis of the New Age. And I've got
a bunch of notes, so we're gonna look at that,
and this is going to function as our first Globalist
Book series book today and there will be the second
half of this talk for the subscribers to Jay's analysis,
and you can get more in depth critiques of these
works if you subscribe. But I've mentioned a lot of
times Tahart to Chardine, and you never hear this guy
brought up in people's discussions of the New World Order
and all this stuff, because people don't link various groups together.
People will say, Oh, it's all the Jesuits. Oh, it's
all the Vatican, it's all the Zionists. And at the
tip top you have an overwriting worldview, an overwriting perspective
that really makes use of all the different perspectives, these
different lenses. And many of the top globalists and thinkers
have been Jesuits. Okay, many CIA people have been Jesuits.
That is true. Now does that mean that the entire
history of Catholicism is therefore part of a vast conspiracy
or that the Vatican created Islam? That is literally as
dumb as flat Earth. I mean, anybody who thinks that
has got to be like eighty eighty like the level
of IQ to believe that is equal to the number
of flat earth bots that have thumbed down this video.
So Marilyn was writing her book at the turn of
let's see what the exact data. Her book was nineteen
seventy six, So this is coming out of the cultural
revolution of the sixties and the seventies, and this would
be very influential in the corporate sphere. And what she
was trying to do is posit these ideas about networking
and how the new ways of thinking that are going
to definitely be connected to the New Age, are going
to be fostered upon the world through Americanism and the
corporate sphere. So instead of thinking that we have to
oppose corporatism or the corporatocracy, we should rather think about
the global mono corporate culture as aiding us in the
process of bringing in the new world order. And the
corporate world is not completely owned by Zionists, is not
completely Jewish. There are countless fortune one hundred companies that
are run by white guys. Hey, guess what. There are
Saudis that run for one hundred companies, and there are
Chinese companies, right, So it's not at the global level.
It's utterly preposterous to say that a few thousand Masad agents,
I mean, Massade has like a couple thousand agents that
they run the entire world. And because there are people
above that, and there are plenty of people who have
absolutely no interest in Israel, they don't care about Israel.
Do you think Bill Gates and David Rockefeller give one
crap about the Middle East? No, And David Rockefeller is
not Jewish. None of that's true. Now again, so what's
my model, what's my paradigm for understanding this stuff, that
it's no different than the New Testament, the Book of Acts.
Who were the two powers at that time united against
against Christ, against the Logos. It was the gentile power
of the Roman imperium together with the apostate Jews in
the first century who rejected the Messiah. And so scripture
is very clear that both Herod and Pontius Pilot crucified Christ.
And so in today's world, guess what, the battle lines
are no different. There is a joining of forces on
the part of UH, the Zionist power, which is just
a faction of the globalists. And you can demonstrate that
objectively with various books. Now does do do Does Apak
and the stuff have an influence in American politics? Absolutely,
especially and mainly as it pertains to the Middle East. UH,
And yes, open borders and these kinds of things. That
does factor in not denying any of that, I'm just
saying that that we get these these unbalanced perspectives if
we look at things like UH. This is one of
my criticisms of the all right, is that it's all
jujuju and it's not honest with the rest of the spectrum.
The Jews have not had the majority of power in America.
They did not gain power until the early twentieth mid
twentieth century, people like Bernard Baruch. You know, Hollywood was
originally an elite wasp thing, and then it became a
Catholic influenced thing, and then it became a Jewish thing.
So there have been these various structures and powers at work,
different groups and factions and mobs. You could read Gus
Russo's books Super Mob. It discusses this. He's Jewish. So anyway,
we're not launching into all that. But what I'm saying
is that the New Age movement, for example, right, if
we look at the UN and I'm sure everyone is
aware of the UN having this giant black cube that
you supposed to go meditate and worship forces next to,
which is very real. They have an on site guru
at the UN what was his name, Shri Moy or
something like that. And if you look into Buddhism and
the history of the Dali Lama, guess what. The Dali
Lama is not an alt right figure who opposes Uzionism
or something like this. The history of the Dali Lama
was connected to fascism because in the Tibetan tradition. Guess what,
there's a left hand path and a right hand path.
Did you know this? And there is a great book
that I've never been able to find except online. I think,
what was this guy's name, Victor Tremandi. I think, I
don't know if it's still online. But a long time ago,
maybe ten years ago, I read his book on Buddhism,
Tibetan Buddhism and all this stuff. And what he does
is he traces the history of Buddhist thought and particularly
Tibetan Buddhism, and it's different schools and traditions back to
you know, older occult ideas, older indigenous Tibetan traditions of
ancestor worship, and you know, trying to contact the other realm.
And that's why the Tibetan Book of Dead the Dead
has a you know, all these levels and gateways, is
like a board game or something like Final Fantasy or something,
Tibetan Book of the Dead. But the point being that
the fascists in World War two were were very connected
actually to the Dali Lama. But let's fast forward to
an La Times piece that I was reading this week
about the conflict in Myanmar and what's called the Crimson Revolution.
And excuse me, this was one of these NGO things
that we've covered many times. And actually Ingdahl is who
hit me to this. In his book he Full Spectrum
Dominance covers the history of India goes in relationship to
the Dalai Lama. Now, not hardly anybody knows this. I
can't believe this because it's actually very easy to verify that.
You look into the history of the Dalai Lama and
the reason that he supported the Free Tibet stuff, like
he became the vocal proponent of that. Now get this,
guess what you didn't know. Guess who was his like
bff in this movement? None other than Uma Thurman's dad. Now,
Uma Thurman's dad is a un guy who is connected
to the believe he's the head of the Free Tibet
movement or association some building in New York that he runs.
And what that shows is again the idea that from
the globalist perspective, we don't have to go very far
before we start realizing that all of the religions are
seen as tools and means to an end. I mentioned
this week this essay that somebody in Orthodoxy had written,
and it's a good essay. It's called between two Thieves,
the KGB, the Russian Orthodox Church and the CIA, and
you can google that essay. It's a guy's personal account
of how both the Western CIA and the KGB had
interest in using Russian Orthodoxy, and it also explains how,
you know, the goal of Russian Orthodoxy. Orthodoxy in general
has always been that we are not subservient to the state.
We do believe in national churches and nationalism, but we
do not believe in subjecting those entities to the state ultimately.
And when you look at the history of the Church,
you'll see that many emperors tried to subvert the Church
many many epochs, especially during the Iconoclasm contry, and we're
not successful. So if the if the Eastern Church was
truly ruled by the state, we wouldn't be here. We
would have we would have fallen apart long ago, like
the Church of England. Look at the Church of England,
the most preposterous CUK left pathetic New Age institution that
goes by the Moniker Church. What a joke. The Episcopal
Anglican Church is good grief and Rowan Atkinson not rowing it,
mister Bean or Rowan, whatever his name is. That was
the the Archbishop of Canterbury, Archbishop of kuck Aberry. Uh
he and his radical leftism. He still attends Druid ceremonies.
Looked that up in the either the Telegraph or the
or the BBC. We'll see the Archdruid of Canterbury, of Kuckaberry,
of Cockberry out there gallivanting in his druid outfits. What
in the world does Christianity have to do with ancient Druidism? Nothing?
But these people are phonies. So how do we get
this overriding conspiracy with phonies and all these different religions.
And by the way, you can look up that La time.
Look up Dalai Lama. I should have screenshot of this
before I started this talk, but look up Dalai Lama
Cia La Times and you'll get all the money that
went funneled from the Dalai Lama into the Mayan mar
and different Ngo color revolutions. The Dalai Lama is an
agent of color revolution. He's a total fake. And you know,
I remember watching Twin Peaks, and you watch Twin Peaks
and Agent Cooper is all about Free Tibet. Then you
realize that, oh, Free Tibet's actually, you know, a ci thing.
But I didn't know that much. In terms of Uma
Thurman's dad, which is very fascinating because this directly connects
into Hollywood, And isn't it interesting that Uma tends to
play a lot of assassins by rolls. She does this,
she plays the the character who has an alternate identity
all the time, truth about cats and dogs. She plays
the an alternate identity In The Avengers. She is a
mind control chick. She's mind controlled by the Sean Connery character.
In Kill Bill, she is one of the assassins. She
has her front as a mommy, a house mommy, and
then on the side she's one of Bill's assassins. And
so I'm sure there's plenty of other Uma Thurman roles
we could think of where she does stuff like this,
But isn't it isn't it interesting that her dad has
this role coming out of either n Yu or Columbia
as like top But he's the first American to be ordained.
I think in Buddhist tradition, Buddhists have being ordained or whatever.
And I'm not trying to make too big of a deal.
I'm not saying that Uma Thurman's dad runs the world
or anything stupid like that. I'm just saying that there's
all these other very very interesting, fascinating connections. And again,
what do you tend to say? Where does the money
come from? That's the big question here. Who funds all
of this stuff? Where does the money come from? And
this is the flat Earth. Yes, Uma Thurman is in
The Avengers. People in the chat that didn't know this, Yes,
Pagan revivalism is absolutely, totally cia totally foundation created. Changing
images of Man is another one of these important documents
that I mentioned in my Tavistock talk. There is a
movie from nineteen ninety eight called The Avengers. Has nothing
to do with Marvel. It's based on the old satire
British spy show The Avengers with Ray Fines exactly and Uma,
by the way, that's as goofy as that movie is.
I think it's like one of the top Razzi movies.
It's actually not that bad. I mean, it's dumb, but
every movie in nineteen ninety eight was dumb. But that movie,
it was all about weather control and you have high
level freemason running weather control. Here we go. Hello, this
will be in the book. Actually, I'll be discussing all this.
But yeah, isn't it funny nobody knows. Everybody wants to
talk about Zionis all day. Hey, what about the Dalai Lama.
He has quite a bit of influence, don't you think
on millions, maybe even a billion people. Hollywood loves the
Dalai Lama. Susan Sarandon goes and Richard gear go and
hang out. And when anytime the Dalai Lama says something
that's the most been all obvious thing, they all cry.
They sit there weeping. When he talks talk about bullshit.
The Dalai Lama gets up there and he's like, to
be truthful, you must be the truth. Whoa mind freaking
blown dude. To engage the enemy, the enemy must first
engage you. Right, It's like the mystery if you watch
Mystery Men, the Ben Stiller movie, and there's that character Mystery.
Every time I think about the Dalai Lama, I think
of that guy because his superpower is just saying shit
like that. Anyway, but that's that's literally what we get. Yeah,
it's like the Dalai Lamas is literally like Hollywood level
nobody ever talks about this ever, nobody except Ingdall. I
have to give Ingdall credit for that, and I'm not
saying that that means Ingdall's arguments in favor of China.
I don't buy any of that. China is not against
the New World Order, although the only here's the explanation
I think for that. So it is true that China
doesn't want the CIA and the CIA using the Catholic
Church a lah David Wimhof's book, to come into China
because it will be an agent of globalism and it
would create the global monoculture. Right, So the only reason
the globalists are are tolerating China having the wall and
closed borders and all that kind of stuff and not
having total globalism is because the globalists want China to
remain China as the engine of manufacturing. That's why, because
it was chosen, as I showed you, by the Royal
Society back in the twenties and thirties that they would
deindustrialize the West and then it would be China to
be the manufacturing powerhouse of the globe. So that is yes, exactly,
China is the new World Order. So some people get
confused by this because they're like, Oh, how come China,
you know, wants to retain Chinese culture and they talk
like they oppose Western capitalism and globalism. Does that mean
that China is the good guys? Now? No, I don't
buy that. And we got a new exactly, Yeah, China
is chosen to be the new chosen Nites exactly. So
it has nothing to do with America versus China. These
are two chess pieces on the globalist chess board. Brazinski
says that in his book Again the alt Right, Okay,
for all their insights and good points, why do they
never talk about the CFR? They don't ever talk about
I've been bitching about this about the alt right for
five years now. I read the alt right blog eight
years ago, nine years ago when it started, and I
have never heard a single alt right person that I
can think of, which I don't really count Cernovich and
all those people is alt right. I have not heard
any of them ever mentioned David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission,
the CFR, and the globalist points that I'm talking about now,
to me, that's unbalanced. So what I try to do
is strive for balance. We're way off topic here, but
the whole reason I brought up Dalli Lama. Yes, I
know Alex Jones talks about the CFR. I don't count
Alex Jones's alt right. The alt right began by criticizing
classical liberalism. Alex Jones every day says he's a classical liberal.
So again, Alex Jones, Perso Bayak or whatever his name is,
and Mike Cernovich don't count as alt right. And just
because Hillary calls somebody alright, doesn't mean they are. Alex
Jones says, Hillary coined the term alt right. No, we
have interviews every day with Andy Nowicki, who was the
co founder of the website. Alright, so not every day,
but you know what I mean. He comes on boiler Room,
which the SPLC just said is a Russian operation. By
the way, so we're no longer CIA fronts we are
we are now Rush agents. So is this CFR evil
because of globalist influence? The CFR was set up by
David Rockfeller, not Zionists, and so know, the Zionist didn't
take over the CFR. The CFR has always been above
that conflict. And that's why the guy who founded the
Trilateral Commission has never been a fan of Israel. Okay,
if you read Israeli Right websites, they hate Brazinski. They
can't stand that guy because why because look, there's two
factions of globalism. Okay, you can read look at look
at say if you read the Guardian and you read Monbiat, Okay,
Monbiat's is the big neoliberal critic. You'll read a Monbiat
article and you're like, oh, hey, he's making actually some
good criticisms of neoliberal economic theory. And then what does
he go into Oh because of climate change, Oh, because
we got to be green, Oh, we got to depopulate.
So he's part of that globalist you in faction, the
left faction, which is not a real it's not a
real thing. Okay, they all have the same end goal, right,
So you could class Manbiot with Brazenski, with any of
the the Jacques Attalie. Okay, we'll be talking about Attlee next.
And I was just reading Atalie and him talking about
how all the nation states gotta go. Uh and some
of these many of these people are not fans. Israeli
Right does not like these people because eventually that will
mean that Israel does not have an existence, and many
of the globalists don't like that. They don't want any
nation state. You think Bill Gates cares about Israel, he
doesn't care about Israel. So it's it's a it's a
lower level dialectic to think that this is all about
Israel versus every other country. It's just it's just not
true in the global spectrum. And then you have on
the other side of the globalist false dialectic is the
neo conservatives. Uh. And the neo conservatives will criticize the UN,
and they'll criticize China uh, and they'll talk about Americanism
and all this crap uh. And they do have a
large Zionis contingent obviously, amongst them William Crystal, et cetera,
et cetera. This is very well known, okay. And so
that's how there can be a book put out by
John Meersheimer criticizing the Israel lobby by one faction of
the globalists. Do you think that they would allow that
book to come out with the promotion of Brazinski if
this was this was complete control. Do you think that
there would be Palestinians if Zion why would they even
be there? If Zionists controlled the world, they could just
mow them over easily. Uh So there there are levels
of real, uh conflict and debate, And I just don't
think that Zionists run every single aspect of the globe.
The if you read quickly, the power in America was
in the hands of the largest wealthiest families at the
turn of the century. Okay, so the biggest families in
America in nineteen hundred owned over half of America's wealth,
according to Quigley. So that means that at that time
the robber barons of America, the JP Morgans. And yes,
I know that the JP Morgan was intimately tied to
the rachel I'm not denying that. But in America, the Vanderbilts,
the carnegiese the Morgans, Rockfeller Interests, many of these other
families that are listed, they had the control of the country.
Now by that, what that means is that they had
the sway in most big decisions. It doesn't mean that
they literally controlled every single local politician or anything like that.
That would be naive, I think. But if you read,
if you look at a book like Mystic Core of Memory,
they will show you how the alteration of the American
landscape culturally speaking, has always been dominated by the Rockefellers.
So this is a giant puzzle piece that the alt
right never mentions. They don't ever, ever, ever talk about
the Rockefellers. Okay, and so yes, the alt light, I
guess we could call them. They will talk about the Rockfellers,
but that's all they'll talk about. They won't talk about
anything else but globalism. So I think I have men
for a long time talking about all of these factors.
And classical liberalism is the root of the problem. And
so the alt right is correct to see that classical
liberalism is the root of the problem. But the alt
right is wrong to act like Darwin and nietzschee and
atheism are going to bring us out of this conundrum.
They're not. But we were talking about Dalai Lama. So
what about the Dalai Lama is how is that rele
went to aquarium conspiracy. Well, because of the United Nations
and because of the CIA connections with very public, very
documentable connections to the Dalai Lama. They knew that they
could utilize things like Buddhism to promote this in the West. Now,
the ecumenical movement, as we talked about many times. And
I'm actually going to read from the Rockefeller books here
to prove to you that from the authorized biographies, that
the Rockefellers are behind not just the ecumenical movement, not
just feminism, but all of this stuff. Okay, But the
idea in Ferguson's book is again transformation through networking. Okay.
So she says that America has been at the forefront
of forefront of revolution and that the the the early
ideas of Americanism and the New Age which are bound up,
she says, actually come from her meticism. Yeah, exactly how
long have we been saying that? I've been talking about
that for at least twenty years because I learned it
when I was in college. And she mentions the clear
background esoteric thought that has always impaled impelled American ideology,
not just from the French Revolution but up into say
the Transcendentalists. So she mentions Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Thureaux,
both of which are extremely boring. I can't believe anybody
likes that stuff. She talks about. Let's see more American
ideologists Al cat Fuller. She talks about the idea of Quakers, interesting,
the inner light of the Quakers, the influence of German
romantic philosophers including Karl i All Cole Ridge and Swedenborg.
And Swedenborg, by the way, it was a spy. Did
you know that you can't be all right unless you're
a race realist? Yes, I know that, Thank you, super
chat guy. But that has nothing to do with the
points that I made about criticizing the eilt right.
Speaker 3: So so she goes through all this and then she says,
Eastern thought is going to be very important, and it's
really people like William James, through his varieties of religious experience,
that tried to show that all religious experience is at.
Speaker 1: Root the same. And yeah, if you read if you
read William James, you'll see that it's it's clearly a
project that is supported by people behind him. And there's
a couple of books that deal with this. One is
what's that one book? Oh, a Messianic character of American
education Because Dewey and Horseman and William James and all
these characters, they do have an influence on American education
and their socialism is impelled by their religious philosophy. And
so someone like William James. He thinks that something like
Buddhism or these far eastern religions, because they're anti logic,
anti Western, that they can be a means by which
we can achieve global socialism because in these idiots' minds,
the problem of mankind as logic and reason, Well, that's
not the problem of mankind. And just because somebody has
a similar conversion experience, it doesn't follow that at base
all the religions are the same. But that's kind of
the you know, founding presubposition of William James's book. And
William James obviously had a tremendous impact on America and
American education, and you can see this in other influential
characters in America. I mentioned the many characters of who
were fundamental in American practice in terms of how public
education could be a tool for socializing. And now I
wrote an essay that's had a lot of views over
the last couple of years that touches on this called
modern education is Pavlovian conditioning. And what you'll find out
is that whether it's the invention of kindergarten all the
way up to advanced technical schooling, education was always conceived
of as a tool for bringing salvation through democratic socialism.
And it's always been utopian, and it's always been egalitarian.
And that is word for word from the characters who
founded it. Okay, I'm going to read you some quotes
from famous American philosophers, thinkers, and public education founders, and
you're going to see this and guess what. They're not
all Zionists. Okay. The common school is the greatest discovery
made by man. The common school will be expanding its
capabilities and let it be worked with the efficiency of
which it was susceptible, and then nine tenths of the
crimes would be obsolete. In other words, he's saying, if
we do public schooling, ninety percent of crime will go away,
the long catalog of all human ills will be abridged,
men will walk safely day by day. Now, that's Horace Mann,
one of the early Unitarian Universalist founders of public education,
and who was one of the most pre eminent Unitarian Universalists,
none other than Thomas Jefferson, hallowed by the bogus Unitarian
Universalist Church a total un entity. See the next guy,
James Carter. An institution such as the public school would
become by its influence on society and particularly upon young people,
the engine to sway all public sentiment, public morals, and
public religion. It is more powerful than any other in
possession by the government. Well, there you go. This guy
even thinks it's more powerful than Hollywood. Now he was
probably right in that back thirties or forties. But I
believe that the public school is the new instrumentality for
the advancement of all humanity, for the human race. I
believe that without them, schools would be shorn of strength
and healing power. It is like Christianity itself. Horus man,
Let's go the next one. Every schoolhouse is a temple
consecrated in prayer to the physical, intellectual, moral culture present
in every child in the community. Henry Barnard, reading and
writing are taught too early. Reading and writing are artificial
and uneducational. I mean, you couldn't get more blunt in
the weaponization. And that is from one of the forefathers
of American public education, ge Stanley Hall. Did you hear me?
Reading and writing need to be delayed and are artificial.
Now you have to understand these characters, John Dewey and
all these guys. They literally say that the purpose of
school is not to teach you education, but to socialize you.
And the reason I'm saying all this is because it
ties directly into Marilyn Ferguson's book, Because Marilyn Ferguson is
talking about the Aquarian new Age. And who do you
think said that the Aquarian new Age would be brought
in through the public skiol schools. None other than Mama
Blavatsky herself, that ugly fat bitch, Mama Blovatsky. Yes she's
she did say that. And at the turn of the
century in the there used to be a magazine actually
put out by the Scottish right called the New Age Magazine. Uh,
the Scottish Rights New Age Magazine had like what's the
word I'm looking for? Like they put these essays out
as as like a charge, like go forth with this
this attitude of dear Scottish ripe Mason's uh. And the
essays say that it is the public school that will
be the harbinger of the new world order. Now I
never hear I hear alt right people bitching about all
kinds of things and race and all that and that,
And I do discuss this stuff. We talk about ethnicity.
But look, you have to understand all of this stuff.
All of this stuff, it's together. It's not a one
or you know, all or nothing thing. And guess what.
A lot of these people are atheist and Nietzschean and
Darwinists too. So how are you going to combat the
root of the problem, the root of the of the
errors in worldview? If you're fixated on one problem in
the worldview and your same foundation is nietzsche Darwin right atheism,
it's not gonna work. Just a couple more quotes. Democracy
will signify a way of life that cannot be limited
to excuse me. Democracy must signify a way of life
that cannot be limited to the majority. It is a
guiding principle for the formulation of all national educational policy.
So here you have, like at the beginning, these are
all people a long time ago right foundation of American education,
and they're literally saying that the goal is to wipe
out intelligence, right, to wipe out meritocracy, get rid of
people that are smarter than other people. How by making
them all fucking retards. That's how dumb them all down,
make them all tards, and then you won't have the
problem that Bertie Russell talked about of people figuring out
how this all works and how it's a big ass scam.
John Dewey, the public school is a social center born
of democratic movement. It is a social center that is
the means an active, organized promotion of socialism. And it
is the tangible things of art, science and other modes
of social intercourse that will be changed. He's saying. So
the public school, he's saying, is what will change everybody.
It's what will brainwash everybody, literally the behavior and here
we go. This is how it's all like stimulus response
and you have the bell saved by the bell and
all that crap. I'm joking, not slave by the bell.
But when you have the bell ringing, that the that's Pavlovian.
I'm not joking. The bell in your school that rings
to take you from one class to the next is
literally from pavlov And that's because JB. Watson one of
the forefathers of Pavlovian behaviorism. He also was formulative in
public education. So the idea that we're going to go back, oh,
if we can go back to forties and fifties America,
right to white wasp America as many altright think, all
of these formative people in power, we're already planning where
we are now, So how are you going to combat
that with the same presubpositions as these idiots? And then
here's this other This is the woman who invented kindergarten,
Elizabeth Peabody. Uh, and she says, I'm not kidding you
go to these people treated as a religion. Okay, Childhood,
when childhood's understood, is the leading. It is leading in
the promised millennium of peace to come on the earth.
That will be amongst men of goodwill. It will make
mankind forget the division of Babel, and it will enter
into a mutual understanding of a new Pentecost miracle. So
public education is what will basically she's saying, create a
new Babbel. And this is the woman who created kindergarten.
Now that's just a survey of like the top five,
you know, well known public education theorists in America, and
they all say the same crap. I've never heard an
all right person ever talk about that. Now, maybe Richard
Spencer has mentioned that kind of stuff, So I'm not
being unfair, But my point is that we can't be
a mono issue. We can't focus solely on one problem.
So back to Marilyn Ferguson as we saw her, and
she does discuss public education. She uses the global village
term interesting page fifty five. She says that we will
create Marshall mclewin's global village through mass media, and she
almost kind of anticipates Facebook and this kind of stuff
with the ways that networking will be done in the future.
And so when she discusses Stanford Research Institute and by
the way, the Internet comes out of MIT and Stanford
and these very schools, she's talking about how they will
erect eventually alterations to the way humans interact through social engineering,
that it will be possible to become truly global and
as good as the Internet is, we have to be
honest here, that's really what the Internet does, is that
it is the mega meta engine for creating the global order.
Now maybe we can, you know, interject a virus into
that matrix. And she mentions changing images of Man by
Willis Harmon, who was a self professed illuminus, by the
way of the Stanford Research Institute, and in changing images
of Man, you have the long term plan that I
covered in my tapstock talk about the total alteration of
America as a whole and Stanford research changing images of man.
Who do you think put all the money into that?
Who who do you think put has the billions and
billions of billions before Soros had billions? Who do you
think had billions to do all this? I don't have
to tell you. You guys are smart enough to figure
it out. The Jays andnalysis nerds know who founded Harvard.
It wasn't Zionus. It was a bunch of stupid ass Puritans.
And by the way, the people behind Harvard, guess what,
there were many of them that were Unitarian Universalists Witchcraft proponents.
I'm not kidding. In fact, people scholars have recently proven
this right. You can It's hard to find, but you
can dig up people looking into the founders of Harvard,
the Presbyterians behind it early on, the New Light Presbyterians, uh,
and then that eventually morphed into Witchcraft Universal's Unitarians. I'm
not kidding about that. That is absolutely one d percent true,
and you can document it. And that's because some of
the early families. It's not like just because somebody came
up to the US on you know, as a Puritan
or something like like, oh, the white Puritans were, uh,
these these great figures that we have to hallow and
if we can only be like our white Puritan forefathers. No, man,
these Puritans are a bunch of fucking wackos. Dude. They
were insane. They were doing magic, witchcraft and hermetic alchemy.
And that's why you can find this in their writings.
Why do you think Skull and Bones is that Yale? Dude? Yale, Harvard?
These are founded by the East Coast establishment elite, and
they hate you. They don't care about you. They don't
care about the white race. That's why their institutions all
promote globalism and killing everybody, and they all talk about that.
So again, what was I was gonna mention? I need
to do a whole show just on Harvard, Yale, the
New Lights, the New Age, and all them damn witches
in the background of Harvard and Yelle. And witches aren't
just women, by the way, did you know that, I'm
sure many of you did. There are male witches and
there are generational male witches. Did you know that the Astors, right,
what's the family? I mentioned it in my goonies analysis.
People think this is crazy, but it's one hundred per
cent true. The family Astor, John Jacob Astor, the Astors
were behind drug trafficking and there were high level Masons anyway,
So Marilyn goes on to talk about Hegel and all
of these figures, dialectics, all this stuff you've heard me
talk about for a long time. And oh, we're gonna
get past the left brain, right, bring dialectic and we're
going to merge the two and it'll be done through computers,
and it'll be done through you know. This is those
hints that transhumanism and stuff in this book. So what
were this? This? You get this, this is this is
this is great in this conspiracy and yes it's a conspiracy,
she says, by the way, she's not against this. This
is a pro globalist book. Okay. Uh. Stage one, So
here she's gonna talk about the process of transformation, and
she mentions in the case of a young clinical psychologist
at a state hospital that was appended to her Aquarium
conspiracy questionnaire, a four page letter that described the process
that this person went through that she's saying society will
go through. Okay, So here's that microcosm macrocosm analogy that
we've seen so many esotericists talk about, and they really
do view it that way. That's why you have to understand,
like the creation of the Internet was not this out
of nowhere a thing. It actually comes out of a
kind of a hermetic view of things, which I've talked
about many times and I have essays on that. But
so she talks about this person who underwent a process
of change. And the first thing that this thesis, this
is like a student, was they experimented with LSD. So
this is back in the seventies, and this is a
student who was doing their masters and they wanted to
work on psychology at I don't know, Stanford or somewhere.
But so the first thing that changed their worldview significantly
was LSD. And if you've done LSD, you know you
can testify as to how that might. Yes, that can happen.
I've had those experiences. We covered it in a boiler room.
But this test student is an example because this person had,
you know, pretty fairly conservative traditional views. Then they did
the LSD and then oh they got into Carlos Castanada.
Oh yeah, and guess what, Carlos Castanado had CIA money
to do what he did. And then this person says, well,
I moved on from Costanada to looking at the notions
of different possibilities of human experience, different levels of reality
and all this stuff in a very new age sense.
And this person says, so what I wanted to do
was do a lot more LSD, but also combine it
with esoteric stuff. Okay, So here we have the actual
integration of the of the esoteric on top of the
drug stuff. So it's like, oh, maybe the drugs alone
don't enough. Maybe I need to combine it with you know,
like how Tim Leary has this whole Crawley book about,
you know, communicating with the debt. He actually wrote a
book about the Tibetan Book of the Dead. You're noticing
a pattern here, Tibet, LSD and CIA, right, Buddhism, And
so meditation was a safer way. I discovered I could
achieve a lot of the same goals through meditating that
I was doing through LSD. When I got good enough
at meditation, and then then this person says, I started
having the experiences and this is where they this person says,
through the meditation they would start seeing the mandalas. Now,
this is a real thing. You will if you do LSD,
you know you will start to see those kinds of things. Now,
you could debate where the mandalas or the geometric patterns
that you see come from. I mean, by the way,
even if you get a have low blood sugar and
you start getting a a migraine, people prior to migraines
will have the same phenomena. You'll start seeing. Your vision
will kind of go into a geometric form. You'll start
seeing kaleidoscopes or like Navajo patterns I'm not joking about,
which is very interesting. Why does your brain start showing
you Navajo patterns when you are low on blood sugar
and about to have a migraine. I don't know, but
this person is mentioning that phenomena, and they're saying when
I got really, really really deep into Eastern meditation and
I got into kral Young, and I realized I should
meditate on the mendalas, and then I realized I should
join the Zen Center in California, and blah blah blah
blah blah, and I realized that pantheism was the truth.
How many times have I said this, all of these
drug idiots, if they're really getting enlightenment, wouldn't they come
to new conclusions? Why do they always come to the
same old conclusions. Why is it always pantheism and oh
I'm god, Ben, We're all gone. It's always the same bullshit. Now,
this is interesting. So do we want to talk about Tayhart? Okay,
let's talk about So Tayhart, obviously, I'm sure he went
through a lot of the same stuff because wim Hoff
says that the Jesuits were doing acid with the CIA
and the jet set, and as I'll be discussing in
my new book, far prior to Timothy Leary, people don't
know this. Everybody in Hollywood was the A listers in
Hollywood were all tripping out. Okay, Carry Grant was like
the true psychonaut before Timothy Leary. Nobody knows that, though
they think that Timothy Leary's No, Hollywood started all this
and it was all the Hollywood elite and they were
hanging out with hux Ley's right, So that that was
prior to Ken Keysey and all that stuff. So Tayhart,
obviously this quite literally Luciferian Jesuit. I mean he self
describes himself in that way. Here's Tayhard discussed when he
discusses his esoteric experience. I'm not joking. This is him
his esoteric experience of crossing the abyss. Now, where have
we heard this before? So she's saying, here, okay, what
we got to do in terms of humanity is get
past just thinking of the self, and we also have
to think of the whole, right, the whole, the collective.
Now she doesn't mean this in like an orthodox theological sense.
She's saying it in the New Age sense. So we
got to think past the individual. And here is Tahard's
self descriptive. Could you imagine like a like a if
the Satanists, or like if Crowley had a ceremony like
Billy Graham and he invited you down to the altar
to accept Cuthulhu into your heart. I mean, I'm not joking,
but that's kind of the way this is written. It's like,
this is Tahart's conversion experience over to Lucifer. Whatever he thinks,
he is, his own invented apotheosis. So here's what Tahart says.
He says, I became aware in my mystical experience that
I was losing myself. So here we have disassociation. So
at each step of my dissent, so he's descending into
his inner subconscious. Basically a new person was discovered, right,
And at each time I was no longer sure if
this other entity was me or if it obeyed me. Right,
so he's starting to see other entities. Basically, when I
had to stop my exploration, the pathway faded beneath my
steps and I found a bottomless abyss. So he's like
descending down stairways in his dark trip or whatever, and
then he sees an abyss, and out of this abyss
arose I knew, not from where the current state which
I dare to now call my life. So then Marilyn
Ferguson goes into how oh he's he went through the
process and he was initiated, he was enlightened. And then
of course Marylyn says that all religions are basically describing
the same process. No. Actually, Christianity has always said this
is demonic, this is a counter initiation. Right, so you
have initiation into Christianity, Baptism, Lord supper, Eucharist, etc. There's
a counter initiation. Did you know that did you know
that Satan Lucifer has a counter initiation, and that's not
my theory. This is a theory that many people across
many religions have written about. If you read Dugan's essay
about the Russian Orthodox Mystery, he speaks at the in
that essay in a very fascinating way about Luciferian initiation.
I'm not advocating everything Dugan says by saying that you
don't have to remind me. I know better than I
guarantee you nine nine point nine percent of you out
there what Dugan says, because I've actually read his books.
So don't bitch at me about Dugan. Uh. But Dugan
explains that principle of dark initiation in that essay, and
he's saying the same thing about it that Marilyn Ferguson
is saying. So let's take another example of this. Let's
take a UN figure who get this. This is crazy,
another UN figure who underwent the process of initiation. Are
you seeing a pattern here? Okay, it's not just monetary,
it's not just an ideology. It's not just a political
commitment to globalism and democracy. Okay. Many of the people
propelling this movement and these ideas consciously and constantly and
consistently talk about undergoing a religious conversion initiation experience, and
many times, not every time, but many times it includes
drugs and LSD. So get this, MK Ultra. Yes, it's
studied scientifically. It's studied by the CIA and the Pentagon
and all that, and we know about all those projects
and programs. I've talked about it at nauseum. Many of
the people involved in it believe it is religious. Huxley
believed it was religious. He talks about that. He talks
about it in Elis and Gaza, his book. He talks
about it in The Perennial Philosophy, that it's religious. So
you think, oh, I'm smart. I have figured out I'm
an alright smart person and realize that there's no God,
and I realize that there are races, You dummy. We
the West has now, the intellect of the West has
known that there are races the entire time of the West.
You haven't discovered something new by figuring out that there
are races. Big whoop. There were people talking about and
weaponizing races and dysgenics hundreds of years ago. And you
think you're so smart because you're an atheist and you
think that there's there's no religions, And I'm an alt
right atheists and I'm so smart because my IQ matches
up to Jordan. I'm Georgia Taylor. I have a white IQ,
my white i Q, and I'm not dissing Jared Taylor.
We've actually had some brief Facebook chats. I don't agree
with his Darwinism, obviously, but I'm just joking around here.
I'm trying to stress the point that it's it's religious
for the people at the top, two dummies, and they
talk about it and they're not always lying. So she
talks about dag Hammer Schoold, and who is dag Hammer Schoold.
He's a top u n guy. What did dag Hammersold
say about his experience of the Abyss? Why do all
these people talk about crossing the Abyss? All right, here's
another guy. Let's see Edgar Mitchell, the astronaut, talked about
the Abyss. And then she goes on to say, dag
Hammer Schuld describes this experience himself. I don't know who
or what put the question. I don't know where it
was put, but I remember saying at some point when
in this process, I answered to someone or something, And
at that point, at that hour, I was certain that
the exist, that existence is meaningful, and that my life
is in self self surrender to some higher ultimate purpose.
So dag Hammer Schuld believed that he had some entity
conveying to him that his purpose in being this great
un guy was for some greater new world order goal.
I wonder what spirit impelled him to that. M Jonah Sauk,
Jonah Saulk was committed to social evolutionary change and transformation.
And she goes on to say that he underwent this.
I covered Salk, and I showed definitively, and that video
has like four hundred thumbs up and like four thumbs
down and like ten thousand views already. And I show
you that Jonah Sauk is not a hero, but he
is a genocidal maniac. Any religious committed person, do you
understand that Jonahsawk admits that he is a religiously committed
man in that book to Luciferianism. Do you understand that
I showed you in Arthur Kessler's book that he doesn't
care about Jews, but he is very serious about his
Luciferianism And he's very committed to it. And by the way,
guess what else? I noticed another interesting pattern in Jacques
Attalie that Arthur Kessler and Sauk talked about why do
they all talk about cannibalism? Interesting they all talk about
cannibalism and they all say that it's just a natural process.
So are you starting to see that maybe Pizza Gate,
maybe ritual cannibalism is not that crazy, even idea for
the elite, maybe hostile. Maybe Eli Roth is not making
up stuff. People don't believe that. And I remember when
Alex Jones used to say that long time ago. He
would say the globalists believe in cannibalism. I was like,
what the freak, No, they don't. That's crazy. What bullshit
is Alex Jones saying? And I could not find proof.
I could not find texts that showed at that time.
This is like, you know, when I was twenty five,
when I first heard Alex saying this, I was like,
what is he talking about? You? And people believe in cannibalism.
I've never seen this. And yes, they say it is
a natural practice. Why wouldn't it be if you're a Darwinist, right,
everything's natural? So here we go. Here is let's see,
she goes on to talk about Carl Young. Carljung is
a total Luciferian. I don't know why these people come
at me trying to vindicate Carl Young. Carl Jung has
an essay called Aon where he says that Jesus and
lucifer are twin sides of the same coin. So anyway,
what's very crucial in terms of Marilyn Ferguson is that
she is literally talking about Illuminists, Okay, and now she
doesn't mean Illuminati like the sense of the seventeenth century
Bavarian group, although there are some parallels to the seventeenth
century very Illuminati. If you know about the French Revolution,
you will know that the overriding philosophy of either the
right wing or the left wing or the French Revolution
period was Masonic. Now this is detailed in Fire in
the Minds of Men, It's detailed in Terry Mullanson's extremely
scholarly treatment of the history of the Illuminati as an
actual group. So you don't necessarily have a hand by
hand initiation of you know, like it's not like Alister
Crowley was initiated into the same thing as Adam Weischeiitz.
They weren't. Just because people use the term illuminist or
whatever doesn't mean they're of the same group. And they're
not all bankers. There were plenty of nobles in Europe
that were illuminists and that were initiated into this rationalist religion.
Is what it is is a kind of rationalist naturalism, right,
So it shares a lot of similarities with Plato and Platonism.
The actual quote iluminous. And that's why they taught communism.
So they were interested in opposing orthodox religion, established religion,
and monarchy and the establishment of new supposed orders. Right now,
what some of these books do not go into. For example,
Billington's classic book Mysteriously doesn't really suggest where the money
came for all these groups. And guess what it came
from big bankers. And they weren't just Jewish. There were
Protestant bankers, plenty of them. So yes, there was a
joining of forces of Protestant and Rothchil banking interests. And
I detailed that in depth in my Treasury Hope talks.
So acting like I don't talk about this stuff just
not true. So the Declaration of the Rights of man.
This is the again one of these earlier formative ideas
of you know how, we're going to have Masonic liberty,
and you can be a libertarian or you can be
a communist. Either one we don't care, because you're on
the same team. The French Revolution was a revolution of
merchants and bankers against nobles and church, and the lodges
fostered it undeniably, undisputably. There are tons of historical books
that admit this is not even in dispute. And that's
why we have two strands of Masonry. You have the
British Lodge, the York Right and all that crap, and
you have Grand orient Masonry. Grand orient Masonry tended to
accept the radical Jacobin egalitarian stuff, liberty, equality, fraternity, and
the York Right tried to maintain the kind of girondin
British Crown crap. But both of these suck. They're both bullshit,
they're both fake, they're both a scam, and they're both
at the top, probably run by the same people. So
again this is all nonsense. It's all a scam. And yes,
it is true ideologically that many of the ideas of
vyshopped of the hermetic characters the time of Hegel, and
Hegel was influenced by Hermeticism. It is true that those
ideas pass into modern hermetic groups, Rosicrucians, Chroleians, esotericists, New Age, right,
the New Age does arise from these ideological strands, right,
And yeah, I'm sure that many Masons excuse me, many
Masons haven't has since been initiated over time into these
same mysteries. So yes, in a way, that's how there
is a kind of continuum of illuminism from the time
of bishopped in the French Revolution down to today, because
there are still Masons today and they still engage in
teaching the same ideas, and they're still at the forefront
of all the revolutions. And so guess what today's revolutions
are just the outworking of the old revolutions. That is
the key, and good old turd Ferguson here admits it
for us in her book. Now, just because she admits
it doesn't mean it's true, but she does source her stuff.
And it's what I've been talking about for so long.
It's the same plan, the same plan of capitalism and
communism have the end goal of brave new World. And
that's what Huxley explains at the beginning of Brave New World.
And that's why the character in Brave New World have
capitalists and Marxist names. It's the year of our forward.
It's Bernard Marx, right, because they have the same end goal.
What's the end goal? Well, you're told it was liberty. Oh,
but guess what we screwed you over bait and switch.
It's actually slavery. Now is there a Zionist role in this, Well,
there wasn't Zionism at this time, but yes, there were
rabbis and there were mysticists Kabbalists who were influential on
people like Hegel. But Hegel is not a tool of
Moses Hess or some you know. Hegel is not a
tool of some rabbi. Hegel is Hegel? Right? In German philosophy,
German idealism can be influenced by multiple sources. And guess
what Cobblism is Platonism repackaged. Uh oh, whoa big surprise.
Cabbalism as platonism repackaged. You can even look at our
good friend al Pike. I'm joking, he's not our good friend,
but I'm saying you can look at Albert Pike to
see in Morals and Dogma that the whole thing is
like this seven hundred page treatise of blending all the
religions together. Well, where have we heard that Marilyn Ferguson's
Acquiring conspiracy blending all the religions together. Where do we
hear that originally French Revolution Adam bishopped all those characters,
all the religions are just different philosophies all coming together.
And who supported all of this in the twentieth century,
who put the most money into it? Let's find out.
We have to back to basics, have to go back
to basics. So many people not aware of the basics.
So the authorized biography of the Rockefellers is pretty indispensable,
should be in everybody's library, just because you're going to
see by admission that the fathers of the modern world
in America have a unified plan. So let's take, for example,
the Acumenist movement. So we're talking about Pike, and we're
talking about the Revolution, and we're talking about the aquarians
conspira aquarian New Age conspiracy. Where did this get introjected
into all the different American religions in the Rockefeller's authorized biography,
on page one, p. Fifty, we have Daddy Rockefeller becoming
involved in the idea that all religions might ultimately be one.
He inherited grandmother Eliza Rockefeller's tendency to consolidate and trim
away all wastefulness. The philanthropic field where he was most
interested was Protestant theology and Protestant education. The older he got,
the less involved. Junior Rockefeller became in the actual Baptist
Church where he grew up. He saw that by stubborn
adherents to fundamentalism and by debating church doctrine, the Baptist
Church and Protestant Church was likely to lose all influence
in the world. So what did he do well. He
became deeply involved in the presently existing interchurch world movement,
which was based in the optimism of a World War
two victory in Europe. So now, the ecumenism already existed,
but it wasn't as powerful until these people get involved.
Another crusade was that he felt like all of the
factions of Christianity and America should come together. This formation
of the Federal Council of Churches in nineteen eight was
the birth of the official ecumenical movement. Junior Rockefeller became
swept up in the mission. He took it to its
first He took his first and last plunge into the
public arena as something more akin to a ceremonial figure.
He addressed the Baptist Social Union in nineteen seventeen and
spoke of the creation of a one world religion. In
nineteen seventeen, Junior Rockefeller spoke to Baptists about the creation
of a one world religion page one sixty one. Excuse me,
one fifty one. I would set aside all denominations. I
would create one world religion. Blah blah blah. Junior himself
got involved heavily in the World Church movement, contributing more
than one million to the initial movement and eventually forty million.
This is in like, you know, twenties money, eventually two
hundred million. What was the idea behind it? Moving away
from quote fundamentals of belief and preaching a social gospel.
So the social gospel is a creation of the Rockefellers
page one fifty two. The Council on Foreign Relations and
the rest of the internationalist organizations which Mott and Fosdick.
Fosdick is actually the Rockefeller minister. He's their creation right,
and the Gates Foundation, all these things. This is all
part of the modernist movement in Churchianity in America. This
is all on page one fifty two. So we need
a new gospel for a new world order. Junior becomes
the most important financier of liberal Protestantism of this entire era.
So how was it that Protestantism in a few decades
completely collapsed in on itself in America? How did it
become Kuckianity? I just told you, by millions and millions
and millions. Junior himself personally after his death, had contributed
seventy five million to this. And they set up and
own Union Theological Seminary. They are behind Rhinehold Neiber They
are behind Henry Pitt Van Dus and John C. Bennett,
all these supposedly famous liberal Protestants. They're Rockefeller frontmen, dude.
And this is publicly in their authorized biography. They created
the Riverside Church, their own personal church. This is one
of the best best things I've ever heard to describe this.
The main portal of the Rockefeller's Riverside church, get this
has giant statue or says has statues. I'm assuming they're
big of Confucius, Moses Hegel, and Dante Mohammed and what
the fuck? So how is anybody going to defend Acumenism
after this? Anybody, especially if you're some Roman Catholic or Orthodox,
how are you going to defend I'm reading from the
rock Farers biography and it says it was to destroy
the fundamentals and create a new religion. Oh my gosh,
and I want to read one more section. I've mentioned
this so many times, but I'm gonna mention it again
because I guess, you know, we get new listeners and
people don't know this. And my feminism articles have been
shared thousands of times, so that means they've had maybe
fifty to one hundred thousand views, and a lot of
people have messaged me freaking out over these and they
can't believe that I talked about it. But where is
this chapter? Abby Rockefeller is who funded feminism in America
and in particular third wave feminism. I always lose this spot,
but I just want to make it clear, and I'm
gonna read it to you if I can find it
that the feminist movement, and particularly at University of Chicago.
That's the rock Feller University. Did you not know that?
Who do you think set up University of Chicago? Where
do you think all the neocons come from? From the
Rockefeller from the Henry Kissinger seat, the chair of International
Relations or whatever his chair is. They come from the
rock Feller University. Dude, do you think Jews set up
all the universities in America? No? Where is Abby Rockfeller
and her feminism. Yeah, crap, lost my note. Well anyway,
I'm not we can. I can. I'll put a link.
It's actually in my article. If you want to read
my article about feminism, I cite the actual section in
the book about Abby. Maybe I can pull it up
here because people are going to bitch if I don't
actually show it. Three hundred people in the middle of
the day. That's awesome. Thank you for joining us here feminism. Okay,
here we go, let's see Rockfeller Abby. Yeah. Here it is,
page five ninety nine to six hundred, and it reads.
Late in nineteen sixty six, Abbey Rockefeller was visited by
a different kind of supplicant. Roxanne Dunbar was requesting funds
to be sent to a delegate of a coming feminist
conference in Chicago, which is a major gathering of its time.
Together with Dana Densmore, Betsy Warrior is that a real name,
and a few other harbingers the new women's movement, I
guess this is third wave. Roxane had already founded and
put on a inaugural issue of Journal of Female Liberation,
and Abby says quote, I consider myself a feminist my
entire life. I never would have used that word because
I hated anything female. What not a case of self loathing.
But the realization was that there was nothing in what
I had been given as a woman that I liked. Well,
that would be self clothing. All the associations were repellent
to me. Every feminine mannerism was repellent. Putting on makeup,
wearing clothes that men wanted and designed, acting the way
men designed. It seemed as if it was a setup
to make when women contemptible to men so that men
would hate them. What the fuck?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 1: So, with Roxanne and others, Abby Rockefeller started Sell sixteen,
the premier feminist organization. Well, what do you know?
Speaker 4: The giant white wasp dynasty is behind feminism unbelievable.
Speaker 1: And this is what no idiot social justice were you,
no idiot leftists can ever figure out, especially if they're
a boomer. You try explaining this to boomers, you're wasting
your damn time, right, I'll tell you that for sure,
you're never gonna get a boomer to figure this stuff out.
But by the way, doesn't this show the idiocy too
of the alt light who tries to say that, oh,
we're against third wave feminism, we're not against old feminism. Dude,
all your feminisms are blowney, they're all folk, they're all fake. Now,
there were Gloria Steinem. Gloria Steinem was CIA agent. Everybody
knows this now, But this is how how is it
that the feminists got their power? You think you think
these uh uh Jewish intellectuals, these women, these these horrible
uh Jewish feminists, had the money to create themselves into
giant figures Gloria Steinem. No, it's because the Rockefellers promoted
them as these giant figures. That's how. And I just
showed it to you from Why do you think, David
Horowitz writes the Rockefeller biography, call your in, Horowitz, why
do you think Aaron Russo interviews Nick Rockefeller about feminism
and Miss magazine, and that's because feminism is satanic. Now
Marilyn Ferguson talks about all this stuff and changing images
a man talks about all the stuff because the idea
was inversion. I can't read your chats if you make
them all tards. Yes, exactly, yes, exactly, that's the goal.
Make them all tards, my dear, chat super chat there.
I will, by the way, if you want, I will
be reading questions. As you see, this chat is pretty
pretty smoking fast here, so I can't get to everybody's chats,
So if you do want me to read your question,
send a super chat. So anyway, we've been dissecting the Rockefellers.
If you just tuned in, we've been dissecting Marilynd Ferguson's
aquarium conspiracy. And Marylynd Ferguson points out again that the
rise of the feminine and the changing images of man,
this was foster my cigarettes going on, This was fostered
by the Rockefeller money. Playboy magazine had Cia funny. When
you hear Cia, just think Rockefeller. Okay, does that make sense?
Can you figure that out? Who set up the CIA, well,
British intelligence, okay, but who put the money into setting
it up THESS the Rockfellers together with the British intelligence.
How was that? Well, David describes that in his memoirs. Actually,
because David Rockefeller was an intelligence agent, if I recall,
he was OSS and so he says in his memoirs
that his time in the OSS as an intelligence asset
or agent, whatever his role was analysts, I don't remember,
what it did was just be to enable him to
have a bazillion business context. So that's how he set
all that up. That's why the Rockfellers pick presidents. That's
why the Clintons were chosen by the Rockfellers. Hello, Arkansas,
there you go. Why do you think Walmart rose to
the top. Walmart's in Arkansas? Who else is in Arkansas?
The Rockefellers. Who do you think organized Walmart to be
what Walmart is with communist China? The Rockefellers. And why
might that be? Well? Maybe because David Rockefeller has praised
mal the whole time. And the first bank to be
set up in communist China was Chase Bank, and David
Rockefeller brags about in his memoirs. So this is what
the alt right needs to understand. Alt left. Yes, you
need to hear what the alt right's saying. Alt right,
you need to hear what I'm saying. And you can't
ignore this stuff like, oh, well then that stuff matters.
Oh you're just a conspirator. You're a conspirac. I'm sitting
here reading you freaking eight hundred page books. Dude, you
call me a conspiratord You don't read eight hundred page books.
I do regularly. So you're the conspirator because you don't
even know about the conspiracy. So let's see. Yes, and
this is how the Rockefellers all, uh, David Wimhoff's book
got control of Rome. Now you said, well, what about
the Jewish influence in terms of Vatican two. Yes, the
Jews would like to have Tat and Lumin Gentiem and
dignit Tatus humane put into Roman Catholic teaching, because that
would end up giving them a lot more leeway and power.
But it was not totally Jewish power that got all
that through. Yes, Malachi Martin had had Benigbareath connections and
he did helped to get Atat passed through those means.
But if you read wim Hoff's book, The real power
behind all of this is the giant billionaire trillionaire family
who started the ecumenical movement. I mean with their money.
There were a vagabond supposedly Hindu evangelists actually that were
going around teaching Hinduism. That was the technical beginning of acumenism.
Like around the turn of the century at the World's
Fair is where this really began. And that was probably
elites behind that too. We have to look into who
was behind that first monk that started preaching quote of humanism,
I forget his name, but the way that this became
a real force in America, and initially the Roman Catholic
Church forever and ever and ever opposed to Cumunism. They
said it was apostasy. It was apostasy all the way
up into the thirties according to Rome. And then of
course you have the complete caving right with John the
twenty third. John twenty third was the first to host
prayer meetings with Marxists, with Atheists, with Baptists at the Vatican.
That is actually detailed in You don't find that in
the typical you know, traditional Catholics. I've never seen many
trads actually mentioned this, but that's because that is mentioned
in the Life of John the twenty third, and yes,
I've read two different life stories of John the twenty third,
mainline histories, and he was really the pioneer of the
the inter religious ceremonies at the Vatican. The first acceptance
that I'm aware of of globalism is I think Benedict
the fifteenth fifteenth. Yeah, the previous Benedict. He was the
first to cave to saying that he was a supporter
of the League of Nations. So that's your first caving.
That's mentioned in the History of the Popes by Jan D. Kelly,
It's mentioned on ewtn's history of him, so I'm not
making that up. So Rome started caving politically geopolitically with
Benedict the fifteenth time the League of Nations, and so
probably the rock fillers had him roped in by then.
You do see some resistance after that, a little bit
by some of the popes. After Pious the twelfth, the
resistance is gone. It's all downhill and now you got
pro gay Frank, even the normal trads. I was happy
to see this. What's that guy's name, the remnant Matt
whatever his name is, The remnant puts out this video
and they're like, okay, okay, finally we admit Pope Francis
is a heretic. I used to be thrown out of
Roman Catholic churches. Society of Saint Pie is the tenth.
I was thrown out of a Society of Saint Pie's
attent church one time because I said that when they
make John Paul a saint, that you can't reverence him
as a saint. And the SSPX, I'm not joking. They
threatened a lawsuit. They threatened to put me in jail
if I ever came back to their chapel. This is
the SSPX in Memphis, or excuse me, this is the
SSPX chapel in Nashville. Threatened to have me arrested for
saying that they kicked I'm not joking. They threw me
on off of the grounds and pushed me out of
the building. I'm not kidding. And guess what who has
vindicated old Pope Saint John Paul the Great? Isn't he?
Isn't he? Now? Did I get any apologies from the
SSPX for saying what would happen?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: They said, you get out of here. You lunatic John
Paul will never be a saint. Well, guess what, SSPX,
John Paul's a saint. And Nick wonders why I might
have some animosity towards trads. You see, people are a
bunch of queers. That's why pathetic cuck trads, pathetic trying
to have me arrested. Give me a freaking break. Now
you all have eggs on your face? Yeah, isn't that right? SSPX, Nashville,
egg on your face? Are you? I wonder if these
people are they reverencing John Paul by the way he
is that is that a way to sainthood? Is the SSPX?
Are they pro Acumanism? Now? What a joke?
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: These people are so dishonest with themselves. And that's the
thing is the anger is not actually at me, what
you eventually realized. The anger is actually at their leaders.
And so they're mad the people that tell them the truth,
and so then they take it out on the people
telling them the truth. Right. But you know, let's go
read the book at Jeremiah. What does Jeremiah say about idolatry?
And guess what Jeremiah says that I've been reading Jeremiah
lately is why I bring this up. Jeremiah says that
evil is inversion. He says that when everybody in Israel
had turned themselves over to cannibalism and human sacrifice, the
pagan religions, He says that you call evil good and
good evil, and that is the root of your problem.
And who is more double minded than the Society of
Saint Pius a tent and the Catholic trads who call
the Holy Father both holy and evil interesting holy and
evil at the same time. No super chats, I said,
nobody wants to give me shekels here. I guess you
can send your donations, send your send your John Paul
the Great memorabilia to the Nashville Society of Saint Pius
the Tenth Chapel, and say care of Jay Dyer for
throwing him out and threatening him with legal action when
you said that John Paul would never be a saint.
You see, I'm I'm always vindicated. That's the thing. Like,
I'm constantly vindicated. I'm not bragging, but I've done this
for so many years, and I have seen so many haters,
people coming after you, trying to do crap, and it
doesn't go well for them. So where were we telling
all the stories? Why? Why I get mad at the
mad trad mad tread So Another tie in, as I
mentioned in my gnosticism talk, is that Elaine Pagles, when
she published all her Gnostic crap, she got the entire
establishment supporting her book Gnostic Gospels. Now, come on, people,
A lot of these people that argue with me about gnosticism,
why do you think that you n and UNESCO and
the entire media print establishment and the New York Times
and every giant book review place would give Elaine Pagels
a zillion dollars of free promotion? Why do you think
they would do that? If the if the system is afraid,
afraid of gnosticism, get that out of here, Get the
f out of here with that crap. What an idiot?
And yes, I am right it is Unesco on page
twenty seven of Elaine Pagel's book about how we have
to revere the Nastic Gospels, how important the Gnostic Gospels are?
Oh yeah, and the Young Foundation, Carl Young and the
un intimately tied into the gigantic, zillion dollar promotion. Why
do we hear about gnostism? Dude? Thirty years ago nobody
was talking about gnosticism. But now it's everywhere. It's all
over the alt media, and everybody's a gnostic and all
this bullshit, and here it is the UN promoting it.
Don't be duped by this stuff, man, all right, we
got a super chat. John Paul will never be a saint. No,
he won't because he died with a bunch of damn
pagan dust on his head from all the rituals he
went through receiving them till ac And you know, Saint
Peter is not going to let him in the pearly
gates with all the demons attached to his robes. I
should have I should have. I didn't think we would
go in this direction, but I should have put a
bunch of John Paul images of him celebrating different pagan rights. Oh,
the poor trads, the poor trads. Guys. You need to
come on over into sound Orthodoxy. That's where it's at.
And what a history of America. Look at that? So
you see, isn't this just perfectly American? America is the
new Age, New World Order. This is what I can't
seem to get across to anybody. That's why I made that.
Alex Jones meme. The power of the tard is strong
with this one when it comes to America and Americanism.
And you have it again, direct link from uh French Revolution,
Albert Pike, Masonry, Acquiring Conspiracy, all teaching the same ideology.
And they don't care whether you're a left ring wing.
You can be a left wing Mason or a right
wing Mason. They don't care. You can be You could
be a Milo or a Jordan Peterson, Kermit dfrug here,
clean up your room, and it's all American m Kate Ultra.
All right, So I've been talking for a long time
and my voice is getting sore, and we're gonna We're
gonna eventually do the next part for the subscribers. This
has been an hour and forty five minutes. I got
up to three hundred and thirty or so. That was
pretty good. I'm not stopping yet. But here's a good
question from the chat. So here's the section where we're
gonna do super chats. You don't have to send me
a zillion dollars, but man, the Warski scream dudes, Man,
they rack up. They're getting long freaking zillion. It takes
them like three hours to read the super chat, and
JF says we will have a debate. I don't know
if it beat me and him, but you were forced
to sing Aquarius by Fifth Dimension? Is that like a
boy band Fifth Dimension? I don't know what that is?
A new age chorus? Yeah, I know, I was. I
went to a new age elementary school, man, I know
about it. I was put into it because I was
a smart kid. What about the mainstream famous of Heidi Ho,
clean up your room. I am here to tell you
the very obvious things that your parents told you that
you didn't listen to. I need to come up with
some new JBP material. It's getting old. Yes, I am
smoking cigarettes like a fool because I have to deal
with a lot of a lot of things that you
normies don't deal with. Here's anyway, super chat, question time,
Question time, Q and A, Q and A, and we
do have some super chats here. Please if you want
your questions to read, do a super chat. So the
first one is what is the difference between Platonism and magic?
Great question. It really depends on what platonist you're reading.
If you were to read somebody like Roger Penrose, who's
a modern Platonist, there doesn't appear to be much magic
in Roger Pinrose. It's very mathematical, it's very technical, very philosophical.
If you read i Amlicus, it's all ritual magic. If
you read Plotinus, it's not really ritual magic. It's more
of a contemplative sort of meditative seeing your way out
of the trap of this life type thing and returning
to the one your soul has to, you know, leave
this body and ascend back through the sphears. So again,
the distinction between Platonism and magic is only as strong
as the platonist himself. And that's why it's difficult, because
there's not really one specific Platonism, right, So you can
have a medieval cobblist like Nahmanides who is influenced by Platonism,
and you know, he thinks there's all these esoteric truths.
And I can't remember if Nahmoodes believed in like magic,
sigils or something I don't recall atop my head. But
Nahmanodies is often contrasted to my monodies. Mymonodes is the
Aristotelian or rationalist cobblist, and then Nahmanides is the the cobblist.
So Rabbi Jacob Lowe of course, would be definitely a
magical Gollum style Cobaist, and they would all be influenced
by Platonism, because Platonism is basically a kind of structural
mathematical analysis of metaphysics in the world, right, So it's
kind of you can be pasted on and elements of
the system can be you know, deleted and copy and
pasted in from other systems. It's somewhat malleable. But there's
not one Platonism. Now, if we go back to Plato,
there's kind of one Platonism in a way. But Plato
in the Tamayis got all of his doctrines from Egypt.
That's what he says, all of my teaching is the
secret teaching of Egypt. And of course, so you can
go back earlier to Veda's and Hindu Aaryan culture, which
is prior to Egypt. So there is some kind of
rough architecture of perennialism that I would say is really
the true perennialism, so to speak, is orthodox Christianity, and
that means that therefore we reject perennialism proper. But is
there a rough original primal tradition of all religions. There
is because all religions spout in one way out from
the true religion, and the true religion is taught in Genesis.
So when you read Genesis and you read the families,
and then you read you know, the nations splitting off
in babble versus Abraham, and you know, the world versus
Noah and this kind of stuff, I mean, that's that's
the true They are the bearers of the true tradition.
And so throughout history you have all these different cultures
kind of who have split off because I believe the
Genesis account, who develop their own traditions. But if you
look at something like ancient Chinese alchemy, it's very close
to Platonism, isn't that interesting? So I think that suggests
that there is some root of all these you know,
going back maybe to Hindu Aryan civilization whatever. That was
a lot of speculation, but you do see these basic
principles and structures in the Vedas, and so even the
Pythagorean theorem people have shown that even this is present
in a certain way in ancient Vedic texts. So that's
a kind of a very involved, difficult question but Platonism
both is and is not synonymous with magic, and many
Platonists became rationalists and rejected all ideas of magic. So
if you're in the rationalist tradition, and even Plato himself,
many people argue is a step in the rationalist tradition
because you get two different ideas. In Plato, you get
the idea that the gods are actual gods that you
should sacrifice to. But actually no, they're just representations of forces, right,
So the gods represent numbers, or they represent forces in nature, right,
like reason or wisdom or something. So you know, there's
not one Platonism. There's not one magical Platonism. And this
is one of the problems with the hermetic occult stuff, right,
how do you trace the origins of it? There's not
really one hermeticism. There's not one. If you look at
Croley just lifted a bunch of crap. He just borrowed
a bunch of Eastern stuff and mixed it with Western
ceremonial magic. So there's not there's not one tradition that
you can I mean, the Golden Dawn. Come on, that's
a bunch of guys in costumes, you know, pretending like
they have this great tradition and the Masons do the
exact same thing. They're they're pretending they're wearing costumes. And
that's why the higher levels of Masonry get it. It
gets into either atheism or some kind of Luciferianism, right,
And that's what I've been trying to show you with
these characters. Uh So, anyway, that's the two super chat.
John Paul will never be a saint. Another super chat, No,
he won't anymore super chats. I'm going to call it
a day. Uh anymore and more and more questions. I
can look at a couple here in the chat. How
many dimensions is God? God doesn't fit into human categories
such as spatial and time relations, so dimensional categories don't
apply to Crowley was a LARPer? Yeah, Crowley was because
he was an actor and he was opposed or he
was an asset of six excuse me. I have an
interview with the guy who wrote the book on that,
doctor Spence. You can find that on my channel, and
you can see that he's very very clearly Crowley was
a showman. Now I'm not saying Croley didn't engage in
ceremonial magic and didn't do drugs and contact entities. To
some degree, he probably did, but he also souped up
his stuff and you know, ripped off a bunch of things.
So next super Chat, God hardens talmuitik hearts to oppose
the Church. I would say so ultimately, because the New
Testament is very clear about the relationship of the veil.
If you read Paul in two Corinthians three, that there's
a veil that lies over the heart of those in
the synagogue that read the books of Moses and don't
see Christ there, And why don't they see Christ? Well,
because in Judaism you don't really have a direct reading
of the Torah. And it's not I mean, carry oute Judaism.
Come on, that's like nobody. There's like five hundred people
that believe that. You know, Normative Judaism in all of
its forms is mediated through the rabbi, mediated through the talmud.
The talmud takes precedence over the actual texts of the Torah,
the law, and the prophets because you're not able to
figure this out on yourself on your own. You have
to have the oral tradition of the rabbis. Jesus talked
about this right to the Pharisees. That same principle is
still there in rabbinical Judaism, and so, I mean, I
don't think that it's that it's just like the Talmud
itself doesn't have this ability to harden your heart, but
it's rather that the institution of that religion is interpreted
through that lens of the Talmud. And so you can't
really but it doesn't make sense because I actually was
having a debate with a Hasidic dude a few months
ago and I was asking him. I was like, I
was like, do you believe that, like there's an objective
truth or not? And he was like, well, there is,
but you know different, you only go by what the
rabbi that you ask the question tells you to do. So,
but I was asking the question like, well, but you
admit the rabbis can be wrong. So if you're trying
to figure out what's right or wrong in some issue,
and you admit that the rabbis can be wrong, but
you have to go by what the rabbi told you
and you don't ask another rabbit, that doesn't make any sense.
It's like there's not an actual, you know, coherent the
presentation of Judaism. I don't think now you could go
back to orthodox Judaism and my monodies and say, well
that's orthodox Judaism. But you know whatever, Yeah, I mean
the basic point still that the whole thing is interpreted
through the lens of rabbinical debates. So I think a
better model maybe for approaching this question, which is very involved,
is is us look at it like Catholicism. There's a
lot of similarities between Roman Catholicism and Rabbinic Judaism. And finally,
Michael Hoffman has seen this. He had missed this in
his new book, because you get the exact same principles
of Casustri right. Jesus blasts the Pharisees for making up
new laws that contradict the actual law of God, right
through all of these impossible labyrinths of traditions that you
could never follow, and you see the exact same thing
in Now I'm not saying that all tradition is wrong.
And Jesus himself actually advocates the oral tradition of the
Mosaic period. Did you know that he mentions actually several
things that are not revealed that he adheres to. For example,
the idea Matthew twenty three that the scribes and Pharisees
sit in the seat of Moses. Right, he's saying for
that time period for the Jews, that was the authority.
They do have Moses dolic succession. Jesus says, Now, obviously
we're not saying that that's still true after the institution
of the New Jerusalem, which is the Church. But you
see the same trend pop up in Latin Christianity, especially
at the time of the rise of the papacy in
the Middle Ages, and Scholasticism and canon law in the West,
and all of this casustri the moral theologies where alfonsis
legori gives you all the justifications of when you can
lie and when you can't. Now again the chan the
justifications of usury and profitable usury or honorable usury, and
all this gobbligo, which is just bullshit. Obviously they're doing
the exact same thing that Talmudis did. So there's if
you want to understand. So, so, how would we understand
the limited revelation of Judaism in terms of the Talmud.
Well within even within the Talmud, you have the entire
Torah there, right, it's the verses are all there, so
it's not like every single thing that is stated or
looked at it's necessarily false because it includes the Bible,
but it has all these glosses on it, right, So
it would be like trying to make sense of Christianity
by reading only papal letters and encyclicals. Right from an
orthodox perspective, he would be very confused. And so in
the same way, Rabbinical Judaism is just another version of
the papacy. Basically, your but your local rabbi, I guess
is your your pope. You don't go beyond him. I mean,
he could tell you all kinds of crazy things and
you know it's either wrong or right. So it ends
up being relativistic ultimately, is what I got from the
debates that I've had with people in that perspective. And
I would just say that how can this religion, on
the one hand, be true and be completely relativistic? And
most Jews that I've ever talked to, which is not
a ton of Jews, but I don't know, ten maybe
they tend to have a kind of relativistic view of things. Right, Well,
we have, you know, morals for us and then there's
morals for everybody else. But now that might have been
true for a time period, you know, with when you
were living under the Mosaic period. But even in the
Mosaic period, this is what I couldn't get any of
the Jewish people I've debated with to admit, was even
during the Mosaic period, the Gentiles are held accountable for
the basic moral law. I mean, the prophets often talk
about these wicked nations. How could they be wicked nations
if they aren't following the basic moral law right ten Commandments.
The ten Commandments is a reflection of the natural moral law. Right.
We understand that in Orthodoxy in a somewhat different way
than Roman Catholics, but somewhat some but anyway, so you
get this kind of well, God allows the Jews to
have this law and then doesn't care what gentile views are.
But I mean, there's countless places in the Bible where
you know, there is a concern for what the rest
of the nations are doing. I mean, the whole purpose,
according to Deuteronomy, of giving of the law was so
that the nations would see Israel is supposed to be
an evangelistic thing, but they failed at that task. The
nations are supposed to see the wisdom of the laws
that mosaic tradition had and then be converted to the
true God. That's what Deuteronomy says, right, read the first
few chapters of Deuteronomy. But they failed at that task,
and so that's why, of course the fulfillment of all
the prophecies is the Church. So anyway, that's a long
winded answer to talmudism. But yes, any kind of any
kind of thing like that, it can be an idol, right,
the traditions of the rabbi, the traditions of alfonsis laglory.
It's like when I would go to the SSPX Chapel,
and I did that for many years, and I finally
I started realizing, like, these people don't even know what's
in the Bible, but they all they do is pray
the Rosary. It's like the Rosary is like an idol
to these people. I'm not joking. It's like they don't
know anything about the actual theology. And they didn't even
care about the actual teaching of Attican too. All they
cared about was having a Latin Mass. And it's like, well,
why don't you just go to endult like they don't care,
right if ultimately you know you have to be Catholic
to be saved or not, what they care about is
just give me my Latin Mass and that's all that matters. Well,
how many times does God say I don't care about
your rituals? Dude, if you don't have your heart right,
And this is true of any religion, right, this is
true an Orthodoxy, right, if you got all the divine
liturgies you want, if your heart's not right, you're wasting
your time. So anyway, giant encyclopedic tones that you master
can be an idol And I mean it's the same
for me, right, I mean if I worship the Church
Fathers and having read thousands of pages of Church Fathers
for thirteen years, that would just make me another idolator. Right,
so I'm just worshiping my own intellectual understanding of the
Church Fathers, which is stupid. All of that stuff gets
you nowhere unless you have the right heart, motivation, and so, yes,
the impediments of religion can definitely harden anyone's hearts, whether
they be Talmudic, or whether they be Alfonsi Slagori, or
whether they be the Vatican bankers, or whether they be
the Daddy Rockefeller and the Ecumenical movement, whatever, Because the
root of man's problem is idolatry, right, it's the pride
of pride of the fall, and that's all of our problems.
We all have the same problem. We all have the
same self referential ego problem of worshiping ourselves, our passions,
hedonistic desires without self control. Right, the bodily desires are
not bad in them selves, we're not platonists. It's that
they need to be controlled, right, Because if you don't
control yourself, you'll be out of control and you'll kill yourself.
I don't mean literal suicide, you might commit suicide, but
I'm saying if you, you know, don't have self control
and you're doing freaking meth, then you're gonna die. Right.
So that's the whole point, the whole the point of
the religion which all these ida atheists act like creatiodities
of religion is slavery. And then all these atheists are
a bunch of fat asses who you know, drink coke
all day and eat garbage junk food and can't get
a girlfriend. And they're you know, arguing on Facebook all
day and read it and they think Christianity is they're
You're spending what eight hours on YouTube watching Amazing Atheist.
You're a slave, dude. You didn't get free by leaving
the Baptister's now and I understand Western Christianity is an
atheism factory. I will be the first to admit that.
But anyway, thank you for today's chat. This was a
lot of fun. The second half will be for subscribers.
We're going to go more in depth into the New Age,
the Rockefellers and the revolutionary ethos and how things like
the Esslin Institute has it plays a huge role in
this whole idea of globalism. Thank you guys for listening,
and we will have more fun. Folks. It is just garbage, garbage, folks,
unbelievable garbage. Had a request from our good buddy John
Adams there in the chat to do the garbage Alex
Jones voice and oh yeah, and people are asking about
the debate. Yes, I still don't know if Amazing Atheists
will do it. I don't think you will, but I
think that JF means it when he says it. JF
says we will have a debate he says, after the
twenty seventh, what is today twenty five? So like three
more days. I'm gonna send JF an email. I think
it would be cool to debate JF. I don't know
if he'll do it. I'm not saying he's like scared
or anything, but you know, he doesn't his whole thing's biology,
which is cool. But I don't know if he'll do
an atheist debate with me. Yes, if you want to
watch Hollywood Decoded, you have to subscribe to GAYA. I
don't own Hollywood Decoded. It is Guyo's property, or Jay
Wiener's property, or whoever. It's not mine, so I can't
get you into Gaya. But yeah, so you know it'll
be amazing atheist maybe JF, or maybe they'll find some
other dude, you know, Sticks and Hexon Hexan Hackson Stucks
and Stucks net Hammer did respond to me in a
very cryptic way on YouTube so or on Twitter, So
I don't think it'll be Sticks. He didn't sound too
interested in debating. Uh, don't debate JF because he's too
anti atheist. He won't allow for a single argumentat Yeah,
I haven't watched any of his religious debates, so it
probably won't be him. I mean, he doesn't know philosophy
at all. They were like, he was having to look
at what empiricism meant on a stream and people think
I'm making that up. No, I heard him do it.
They were like, and I like listening to Jf's debate.
He's a very talented debater, but he reminds me of
Inspector Cluso. So he's like, we'll have to look up
this question. He's not asking me what is the meaning
of the empiricism. It doesn't sound like some things that
I want to give up. I will for a moment
to keep this in my REPERTOI I couldn't pass up
doing a little bit of Inspector Cluso impersonation there, but
the alt right Inspector Cluso. All right, thank you guys,
We're done, and subscribers, we will have part two up
in the next few hours. Peace out all you, Jayson
and AlSi Senurds, thanks for listening, and thank you for
the super chats. Four or five people that sent much appreciated.
Have a good Sunday. God bless