Speaker 1: This is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and
it's just it's kind of amazing to me. And people
think that this is some kind of based, red billed thing.
Speaker 2: It's not.
Speaker 1: It's a completely controlled and manipulated operation and it has
nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that
these are controlled groups that are controlled by Western intelligence
to engage in irregular warfare, to engage in proxy warfare,
to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas to fit
them into not the American century. Do people understand that
all these boomers and Cold War people think over more
fat to communists, We're going to keep the KG being
Russia out of Ukraine. No, it's not the American century anymore.
Do you understand that that was a con at this anniversary,
I guess you could say of one year of tragedy
in terms of warfare.
Speaker 2: In the Ukraine. And so I thought it'd be great
to kind.
Speaker 1: Of rehearse how we got to where we are and
what the dangers are here, because you know, lately I've
been diving really deep into the Cold War, trying to
get an assessment of what was really going on, why
there was this larger project throughout the Cold War to
kind of synthesize and create this third way out of
the Cold War dialectic for a future technocracy. And we
know that from a lot of the writings of the elite,
which we've covered in the last several years, some fifty
or sixty.
Speaker 2: Though, So if we go back to the reason for.
Speaker 1: The twentieth centuries, two World Wars and the Cold War,
according to doctor Carl Quickly, that was to exhaust the
opponents of the Anglo American establishment, and they would exhaust
them through two World Wars and then through a Cold War.
And if we fast forward up to what happened to
Russia in the fall of Sovietism, the fall of Communism,
this led to the invasion of Western economic warfare and looting.
This is the Harvard Summer's Reuben crew that came in
and through IMF shock therapy, reorganized and looted the wealth
of Russia. So while I'm sure too many people's public appearances,
the idea was that Russia was going to be freed
from Sovietism. And it's true that the Soviet system was
a nightmare, terrible system, and communism is a nightmare, terrible
system absolutely one.
Speaker 2: Hundred percent, and it's just amazing to me.
Speaker 1: I can never really talk about this topic without people
getting mad and assuming that I'm somehow kind of defending
communism or Sovietism, when all I'm really trying to point
out when we look into this is that there's a
danger of taken on new masters, and particularly in the
realm of the religious world, which we've been covering as
we've analyzed various tech to get into the history of
NATO and the history of the can and both the
CIA and the KGB kind of vying for influence and
power with the Vatican.
Speaker 2: In order to understand this, we have to understand the
Cold War.
Speaker 1: And getting out of the dialectical thinking of thinking that
the West is necessarily good and the East is necessarily evil.
If you read Brezenski, for example, in his older writings
all the way back to his nineties text, he talks
about this being a Manichean dialectic, says the Cold War
was a Manichean dialectic arising out of the powers in
the post World War two period. And we might think
that the West was waging a war against communism and socialism,
but the reality is that the elites of the West
were not really anti Marxist. They were against what you
might call classical Marxism. And that's because classical Marxism failed
to achieve its objectives, precisely because.
Speaker 2: There was no workers revolution, right. The workers didn't rise up.
Speaker 1: We didn't see the proletariat overthrowing their masters and.
Speaker 2: Taking over the means of production.
Speaker 1: But what did happen was that there was a reformed
Marxism that found itself a lot more amenable to big capital,
known as Fabian socialism, that was a lot more effective.
Speaker 2: And had a lot more power and influence.
Speaker 1: And it is in fact, entities like the IMF, the
World Bank, the United Nations, et cetera, et cetera set
up by the same Rhodes Milner Rawschild round table groups
that then were able to seize America as well and
turn it into an engine for this same power block.
And they did that via backdoor deals, backdoor intelligence operatives
such as Noel Coward, Rodahl, Ian Fleming, William Stevenson and
others who convinced FDR and convinced people in the administration
to set up this private intelligence network, this secret intelligence
network known.
Speaker 2: As the osays that we become the CIA, which.
Speaker 1: Becomes America, comes Americ's government, and the secret Government wasn't
really tasked with protecting America from invaders, protecting America from
foreign threats. Really it was tasked with controlling and steering America.
Because we see that the other entity that was created
out of this was, of course the Council on Foreign Relations,
and that's a policy steering group that sits above the
government structure, and it in fact hands down.
Speaker 2: The policies of the global elite to the government.
Speaker 1: As an unaccountable, unelected bureaucratic structure that then controls government.
So you're electing elected officials that submit to and are
handed policy by these people.
Speaker 2: Who are unelected.
Speaker 1: And if you look at entities in the government that
really run things, the National Security Council, the State Department,
it's always CFR people always, And the same CFR people
go to the Bilderberg Group, and they are also members
of the Trilateral Commission, and they make decisions about corporate
policy globally as well as government policy globally. Because these
corporations are above government, they own government. And until we
recognize that, until people can figure that out, there's not
going to be any changes. I'm not saying you can't
care about who's elected. But as Quigley says, the president
is limited, right, president can only do so much. Your senators,
your congressman, they can only do so much. I mean,
maybe on a local level they can do more. But
we're dealing with an international elite, and there's not an
international clique that not only has the ability to set
up global institutions that give top down global policy.
Speaker 2: Remember, in the last three years, what do they say
now it's.
Speaker 1: Going to be the UN and the CDC getting their
policies directly from Rockefeller Foundation. This last week, they had
the World Government Government Summit, right, and they had all
these global elites out there pushing for the idea of
an international health organization treaty and control grid that would
enforce mandated stabbys because what held them up the last
time was local, national, and state laws. So they couldn't
forcibly stabby everybody because of regulations. They were saying, and
I put these clips on my Twitter if you want
to see them from the World Government Summit, and so
they said, in the next pandemic, we want to get
rid of all that so that we can forcibly forcibly inject.
Speaker 2: Or experiment on track and.
Speaker 1: Trays, and so while Russia has within it, of course
a fifth column, as Russian geopolitical analysts have written about,
because a lot of the foundations that think tanks to
Carnegie Endowment and so forth, Michael mcfowel, they've been in
Russia for a long time. Because the West took over
and restructured after the collapse via the IMF shock therapy
and the Harvard people. Then we have putin kicking out
a lot of these oligarchs right late nineties, early two thousands,
and that led to a new struggle, a new Cold War,
this new East West battle that's now emerging as a
real large threat.
Speaker 2: So let's get into more of that.
Speaker 1: We want to talk about heartland theory, Mackinder, all that
kind of stuff to go us to background as to
where we might go in this crisis. On guest host
Jay Dire jays Nolysis, Welcome back to the Jay Dier
Jasonolysis talking about the setting for how we got into
this grand chess board situation with Russia and the new
conflicts that have arisen the last year, how it arises
out of the alignments coming out of the Cold War,
and we were talking about this idea of controlling the
Eurasian heartland. This is an idea that comes out of
the British imperial strategy of Lord Halford Mackinder and it
was the kind of operating system for the British Empire
as a sea empire, seeking to control the land power,
the sea power and the land power, the landpower of
course being the Eurasian heartland. And that's why, of course
Russia and Ukraine are so crucial in this strategy. Russia
has to always be kept at bay, always has to
be pushed back. That was the purpose of NATO actually
as a defensive strategy during the Cold War and then
became offensive after the Cold War, which was a violation
of what NATO was supposed to be.
Speaker 2: But we see NATO now tweeting out on its actual profile.
Speaker 1: That NATO is the Marvel Hero Universe power as it
fights against the evil Russians. Yeah, kids, you not, that's
actually on NATO's Twitter. They're tweeting out that they are
William Wallace. They are, even though William Wallace actually fought
against degenerate British kings. But NATO is saying that they're
William Wallace because they're freedom fighters. What does it mean
to fight for freedom?
Speaker 2: What is free?
Speaker 1: And well, in the case of this, this war has
now been cast as a rainbow skittles tr n S
war and NATO fighting for the rights of trn S.
So isn't ironic that in the Cold War, you know,
we were told that we're being persecuted by atheist communists
and if we just have neoliberalism, if we open up
these other countries behind iron curtain to economic liberalism, we'll
have freedom.
Speaker 2: Religion can come back.
Speaker 1: But what happened was, in reality, the largest institution in
the West, the religious institution of the Roman Catholic Church,
was literally being co opted, advised, and utilized by the
Central Intelligence Agency, and multiple books confirm this. Now, the
deeper that I go into this, I'm really just amazed
at how wide and how deep spread this is.
Speaker 2: Even from two conflicting views of the Cold War.
Speaker 1: You have somebody like Paul Williams, who's a Roman Catholic
who's very critical of the CIA and the Vatican during
the Cold War, who admits that it was essentially a
captured institution for the CIA, And then we have a
cold warrior himself, John Kohler's book that admits that. Yeah,
of course, the Brazenski, of course, Kissinger, of course, William Casey.
Of course, they were all working and all the way
back to William Colby with Gladio. Of course, they were
working hand in and with the Vatican, funneling black ops
funds through the Vatican Bank to fight against the Soviets.
And it sounds plausible, right, It sounds okay, that makes sense.
We don't want a bunch of commies running everything. But
the danger here is that when Uncle Sam wins, it's
not really Uncle Sam that wins. And it's not really
communism being defeated for free market capitalism, it's monopoly capital
using Babian socialism to restructure these countries. I mean, is
the EU does this seem to be a economic freedom
based institution?
Speaker 2: To you?
Speaker 1: Does the IMF seem like something that's based around economic
freedom and liberty? Does you NESCo seem like something based
around economic freedom and liberty? Well, if you mean by
economic freedom and liberty going back to the British Empire
and social Darwinism and you know those things, I guess
it does make sense that would be atimistic individualistic enlightenment
libertarianism based around atheistic evolutionary philosophy, in which case rights.
Speaker 2: Don't actually exist. What's this thing? Is rights? Rights or
just arbitrary?
Speaker 1: Because if our all just manifestations of nature, nature doesn't
have rights. Do you think the predator prey relationship has
anything to do with rights?
Speaker 2: Now, it's just brute power, brute force.
Speaker 1: And so we're presented with the situation post Enlightenment of
are you going to choose Hobbesian leviathan state or do
you want a revolutionary anarco state. No state, which, always,
as Plato says, falls over into tyranny because when you
have the rule of the many anarchy, that falls over
into despotism and oligarchy. And so it's just amazing to
me that people would buy into this dialectic. And we're
supposed to have believed that NATO was the good guy
all these years, and the reality is that we're talking
about two different bad guys. Okay, we're talking about Soviet
communism foisted upon Russia and the Baltic States via elites
in the West. It's not Russia organically that was communists.
It's not the West organically that has any of these
ideologies that are unnatural to these people groups. These are
created ideologies that are techniques and systems of control. And
so now that we're in this post Cold War era
where the war became an international war on terror, I
was watching a goofy movie the other night that illustrated
this in a very profound way, which surprised me. We've
done a lot of analyzes of the Bond films, and
typically we think about, oh, well, the most revelatory ones
are going to be the ones, you know from the
classic Ian Fleming period.
Speaker 2: But I was watching Tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Never Dies from nineteen ninety seven, and the weirdest part
about that one, I think that's the second to last,
or maybe it's it's the second Pierce Brosman Bond film.
And if you remember this plot, it's it's pretty instructive
because you have this giant media empire, the Carver Media Group.
Jonathan Price plays the Bond villain as a media mogul,
and the media mogul decides that the the world can
be manipulated through fake news big news right, and so
not only does he engineer crises, he also creates the
narrative around the crises that he's engineered.
Speaker 2: And the plot.
Speaker 1: Involves the East and the West being manipulated in to
a conflict by an international supra international group.
Speaker 2: And that's always in the Bond films, right, Obviously there's Specter,
this kind of thing. Now that's not Spector in this one.
This is, you know, nineteen eighty seven. But here's the
weird part.
Speaker 1: So Bond ends up working together at times with Russian
Soviet individuals. I guess we're supposed to think it's post Soviet,
so they're not Soviet, but they act like you know
that now it's a Soviet terror network. And then Bond
aligns himself with a Chinese communist spy to unfoil the
plot of the international elite. Now that's bizarre because okay,
there are international elites that try to play these powers
off against one another. And I think that to a degree,
that's what's going on. Because I'm not saying that there's
no real conflict or there's no real war. There is,
but I'm saying that in so many films we have
an international elite, this kind of Kissinger Brazenski structure clouds,
you know, the super international elite that plays the nation
states off against one another, and they plan and prepare
for wars decades ahead of time. And so I think, yeah, absolutely,
they wanted this war in the Ukraine, and they want
a new Cold War, and it's part of the overall
strategy to bring in the technocracy.
Speaker 2: And we'll look at that here in a moment.
Speaker 1: Get into the specifics of why these kinds of countries
and states stand in the way.
Speaker 2: Doesn't mean that they're perfect, but they stand in the way.
Speaker 1: Have a certain kind of ideology, a certain kind of
worldview that has to be pushed globally.
Speaker 2: This point Max ass jay Di or Jay's analysis. You know,
what's interesting is that.
Speaker 1: The time of World War Two, when Hitler understood the
importance geostrategically of trying to control the Ukraine and to
push back on Russia, the Galen network of Reinhard Galen
and other Nazis had actually trained and set up a
lot of the intelligence and black ops structures in these areas.
And this ties into NATO's Gladio operations. And what's amazing
is that those networks then were sort of taken over
by the West. We all know about Operation paper Clip,
but people like Dulles and others Bill Donovan. They also
made alliances with these Galen networks that are still running things,
still doing these operations in the Ukraine. So it's amazing
all the posturing in the West about being everybody who's
not for total liberalism as a Nazi, and yet we're
openly supporting and aiding, openly take pictures with Nazi battalions
in the Ukraine, the real actual Nazis. And I mean,
this is just absurd levels of stupidity and hypocrisy, and
it's just it's kind of amazing to me. And people
think that this is some kind of based red pill thing.
Speaker 2: It's not.
Speaker 1: It's a completely controlled and manipulated operation and it has
nothing really to do with these ideologies other than that
these are control groups that are controlled by Western intelligence
to engage in irregular warfare, to engage in proxy warfare,
to destabilize and to restructure and destroy areas to fit
them into not the American century. Do people understand that
all these boomers and Cold War people think, well, we're
more fat to communists, We're going to keep the KG
being Russia.
Speaker 2: How do Ukraine?
Speaker 1: No, it's not the American century anymore. Do you understand
that that was a con and maybe there could have
been an American Century that wasn't a con.
Speaker 2: And I don't know, but all the people who came
up with the idea of.
Speaker 1: The American Century, the State Department, George Keenan, that was
all dreamt up by the CFR and nineteen thirty nine
War and Peace Studies Project from the New York City
Council on Foreign Relations. That's when they created. Right after that,
the un right right at that time. And so this
idea of fostering democracy, fostering free market liberalism, which is
not really what it was, that was for the fortune
one hundred, fortune five hundred to go into these countries
and restructure them, to loot them. So again, does that
make the Cold War iron curtain? Does that make them good?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: But is it possible that we have turned into a
worse thing. That's what I'm trying to pose it to you.
And the more that I read about the Stars and
the KGB and all this stuff and how awful they were,
all the awful stuff that they did to people in
these books, I'm just reminded of. But aren't the global
elite that run things now like ten times worse? Are
they doing ten times worse things? Isn't what they want
to set up with every area of your life?
Speaker 2: Tract and trace a ten times worse version of all
that stuff seems like it to me.
Speaker 1: And while it's true that communism had this ridiculous idealistic
system that was based around everyone being essentially sacrificed to
the collective and to this bizarre technocratic atheistic system, that
was an older technocratic model that has caved to a
new technocratic model. If you remember the way that Brazenski
and Brezenski, the way that bertrand Russell and ah c
Wells these different, these big level strategies, the way they
talked about communism and socialism and Marsam was as if
they were experiments in other countries to see how well
they functioned, how well they worked as control mechanisms in
other areas and for certain people. And not every system
works that well to control everybody equally, because different regions,
different people groups require different strategies. That's why the CAA
studies ethnography to master the local customs and idiosyncrasies of
various peoples to best influence and control them.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 1: Do we understand what's going on really that it's and
it's doesn't mean that Russia is a representation of authentic, pure,
one hundred percent accurate Christianity. There's absolutely corruption in Eastern
Bloc countries. There's absolutely corruption in the Russian government, sure,
but that's everywhere. And if you listen to putent speech,
what did Putins say about what Russia represents?
Speaker 2: It's the representation of a system that I didn't completely
get destroyed.
Speaker 1: In the post Cold World period, in the World War
two and post Cold War period. In other words, there's
a representation of the maintenance of people and their faith
and their tradition and that they don't want enforced Satanism.
Speaker 2: And even if.
Speaker 1: Putin is some villain or something, which he just seems
to be a pragmatic global leader like anyone else. Right,
People always ask me all the time, what do you
think about Putin? What do you think about Elon Musk?
What do you think about Donald Trump? I don't know.
I don't have any thoughts other than I like it
when they do something good, and if they do something bad,
I disagree. So there's no pipe dreams about, you know,
some utopia that's going to be created in some other country.
But there is the reality of Western elites being completely maniacal,
completely out of touch with the reality, the completely I mean,
it's people like brazent Ski and Kissinger and Bill Gates
and and Klaus Schwab and George Soros, and I mean
they brag about what they're doing. They're one hundred percent
into Malthusianism. But even the Soviets weren't maniocal Malthusians, right,
They had ridiculous things like Lysinkoism and these stupid philosophies,
and they would they was certainly killing and starve off
people who oppose.
Speaker 2: Them, but.
Speaker 1: Hourly who by the way, supported all those ideas, now
want something ten times worse than that. Do you understand
how crazy that is? And now we're at the point
where it's like, oh, yeah, now we need to nuke,
we need to we need to blow everything up, destroy everything.
These lunatics like Sean Penn, Let's nuke everybody, Let's nuke
these whole all of those blow up everything up.
Speaker 2: I mean, I can't imagine that these people, I mean.
Speaker 1: It's almost as if they're completely taken over by something else,
something else was running them.
Speaker 2: And they just have this innate thirst for the.
Speaker 1: Destruction of cities, the destruction of countries, the destruction of
what they think is their enemy. Like the view Heartbeat
saying that everybody in the Midwest deserves to be destroyed because.
Speaker 2: That state went for Trump. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: But we see the spirit that motivates somebody like that
can't be good. That is a demonic spirit. And so
this whole Cold War situation and where we're going is
not random conflicts. This is all drawn up by the Rancorporation,
drawn up by these entities created out of the same
network that I'm talking about, the deep state.
Speaker 2: And by the way, it's great that Trump called out Victoria, Newland.
Speaker 1: That's that's I mean, that's who has been pushing this
for all this time, trying to provoke this conflict, trying
to provoke Russia for all these years, back to twenty
fourteen and all the way back to the eighties with
the Color revolutions. But if Rand Corporation was drawing up
these strategies in these plans decades ago, then how can
it be the fault of countries that just want to
preserve what they are in their way of life? And
Ukraine is not a historic nation state. It's part of Russia.
So of course they want Ukraine. Why wouldn't they win.
That is the heart of Russia. Kiev is the heart
of Russia, and breaking it off is a Western imperial
strategy going all the way back to World War One.
So you have to understand that this is a bigger
game that's being played. And it doesn't mean that Russia
or any of these other countries is a perfect utopia.
It means that they represent things that stand in the
way of the advance of total technocracy and total malthusiaan depopulation.
Speaker 2: Sometime you got So's Jay Di or jays analysis.
Speaker 1: We were talking about what emerged out of the Cold
War dialectic and what the long term plan was, and
the long term plan is now completely evident.
Speaker 2: Right again, I think we could give.
Speaker 1: Some leeway to people in the fifties, sixties, seventies, you know,
living in the time of the Cold War. They didn't
have access to the information, they didn't have access to
what we have access to now, and so a lot
of good people, including my family members. I had family
members that fought for the West and were Cold warriors
that engaged in Cold War activities for the Air Force,
for example, And so you know, it has nothing to
do with I want to pick some side because to
have this idealistic view that somehow there's going to be
this future or is itox Christian empire, or that Russia
is going to save the world or something like that. Now,
maybe Russia saves the world by and I don't know.
I mean, things are getting so crazy, who knows. But
I don't think that salvation or anything like that comes
necessarily from a nation state per se. But God can
providentially use situations like this to stave off completely demonized
structures that are openly everybody can see what's being promoted
by the Western elite now and one hundred percent this
is a global agenda. They want to push this everywhere.
And so what's happening is the removal of potential areas
of resistance. And that's not just the Ukraine conflict that
also is domestically in the West. It's anybody in the
in the Western countries that potentially could stand up to
or oppose a threat. That's why there are these long
term operations to demographically destroy different areas and regions. It's
an open stated thing there's a book called Weapons of
Mass Migration by Kelly green Hill. It's a I think
it's a Stanford University publication. I think it's connected to
the Army War College. It's about warfare with population. But
you can't talk about that because that makes you a
bad person, even though it's a public fact that it's
a real strategy of warfare, and that's too weaken and
destroy to integrate into this coming global government. So the
danger is that now that we're reaching this coming to
a head, and now we have Zelenski and others threatening
World War III, if there's a union between Russia and China. Again,
keep in mind that doesn't make any of these powers
necessarily the good guys. And my point is that, as
I was pointing out with the Bond film Tomorrow Never Dies,
there's a lot of other movies that have the same
kind of plot going on. Think about X Men, the
one with Michael Fassman where he's Magneto. You have this
elite group that's trying to kick off a nuclear exchange
between the East and the West. Think about war Games
where an Ai tries to kick off this global world
war between the East and the West. Think about tomorrow
never dies where an elite group is trying to cause
an instantiate in an act that war between the East
and the West. And so I think that there is
a desire on the part of some of the more
demonically energized elites in the West that they would be
happy to see full on total war, because eventually what
happens is that these people are so given over to
evil that they're not even in control of their own
faculties anymore. They lose their own reasoning faculty, and they
become essentially unionize united with evil powers, and by doing so,
they're not in control. They're not steering anymore. They're steered
by something else. And what is it that all these
people want to enact. They want to enact a new
order and new aon, a new era that is posthuman.
Every one of the global elite that we've analyzed in
terms of their books, they're all one hundred percent on
the same page when it comes to this. None of
them disagree. There are no pro human, pro life global elites.
You understand that, none of them. There are none of
them who disagree with a global government, who disagree with
a global single CBDC currency, The bis guy, the Triple
Chin guy just came out again and said FIAT has won.
It is beaten bigcoin, which is laughable. He says that
we will have this CBDC. We will have it and
will shut your wallets off. You will be under total
control for anything you say.
Speaker 2: That's esg.
Speaker 1: This technocratic system was designed out of rand CIA World
War two Cold War operations studying all of the conflicts
to figure out the best techniques and mechanisms to control
and manage populations through tech through smart cities. For example,
in the Phoenix Program book that we analyzed by Doug Valentine,
we learned that FEMA and Homeland Security were set up
on the models of the Phoenix Program and on the
models of Vietnam and population reorganization studies. We learned that
in Vietnam a lot of the AI and drone technology
was first tested out in.
Speaker 2: The Vietnam conflict.
Speaker 1: We learned that DARPA and the Pentagon were strategizing and
testing out vas techniques for masses of population tracking and
control in Vietnam and subsequent conflicts as well. Right Desert Storm,
we know that people were beginning to be biometrically tracked
and traced even at the time of desert storm in
the Iraq conflict. And so these power structures are the
same power structures that control the global drug trade.
Speaker 2: Do you think that these are good people? They're controlling
the global drug trade.
Speaker 1: And the insane explosion of heroin production since.
Speaker 2: The last ten to fifteen twenty years.
Speaker 1: Look at our country being destroyed by legal heroin opioids
and illegal opioids.
Speaker 2: That's because the.
Speaker 1: Western power structure took over all of the drug networks
and lanes in the last fifty sixty years. And they
did that in concert with aligning themselves organized crime, as
multiple analysts have pointed out, even from the FBI itself,
right FBI consultant Paul Williams Ciaoss, they took over all
of the old drug networks, drug lanes. And what I'm
trying to say is that this is what it means
to have full spectrum dominance. To have full spectrum control,
is to control all these areas of life.
Speaker 2: They're not doing it because it's just a hobby.
Speaker 1: It's fun to do, to study. Oh, we're nerds. No,
it's about what they are bringing in. Do you understand
this is not This is a real plan. It's not theories.
I wonder what they're going to do. I mean, they
all put in.
Speaker 2: Their books what they're going to do.
Speaker 1: It's not guesswork. Now, how they roll this out is guesswork.
We don't know what cards these people are going to play.
A lot of people didn't know for sure, or we
didn't know they were going to have this COVID all
this kind of stuff that rolled out. But then after
it happens, we look back and we can say, oh,
they're running all these drolls for the exact same thing.
Crimson Contagient, Clayed X spars document event to A one,
and we can see that this is a strategized, rolled
out plan. It's the same with all these Rank Corporation
documents that have been mentioning, all these white papers that
plan the future, that plan and strategize a global conflict
as one of the cards that can be played. Literally
Rand Corporation strategies about a war between Russia and the West.
Nuclear stranges right PDD sixty or whatever it is Presidential
Decision Directive under Clinton of absorbing a nuclear strike, which
supposedly has.
Speaker 2: Been updated or whatever.
Speaker 1: I don't know all the PDDs, but the point is
that you do have strategies about this, and none of
those strategies are.
Speaker 2: Made with your welfare in mind.
Speaker 1: Because the same people that run giant drug laundering banks
like HSBC and all these other banks that got busted
ten years ago for three hundred million dollars worth of
drug money. You think that's just random bad apples. No,
that's the people that run the West. That's the same structure,
the same people that we're talking about. It's Specter and
Spector would like to see a destructive war probably eventually.
It's definitely one of the cards that they could play.
I mean, I hope there's not going to be a
world war, but they could definitely play that card. They
have talked and strategized about it for a long time,
the possibility of a new world war.
Speaker 2: Now it's more likely than ever.
Speaker 1: It's being talked about openly, and if it happens, it
would be because the elite want that to happen, to
have a mass destruction, to bring in their post human
world where we're run.
Speaker 2: By AI, we're run in some kind of new.
Speaker 1: Technocratics system where everything is tracked and traced. Maybe the
elite emerged from underground bunkers after a giant exchange. Who knows,
but that's definitely one of the cards that they could play.
We have to keep that in mind. And another pandemic
is another card they could play. They could play both cards.
So we have to be prepared for these things because
these are realities. That's the world that we live in,
and if we don't realize what's going on, it's just
going to be all the worse for us.
Speaker 2: Do you want to get my books? Go to Jay's Analysis.
Speaker 1: You can buy my books in the shop signed copies.
You can follow me over on rockfin as well and
get all those products there. And the Tip of the
Spear