WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Before we get started, be sure to head over

2
00:00:02.439 --> 00:00:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to ham Radio two dot com forward slash email dash

3
00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:10.919
<v Speaker 1>sign up to join my email list of over nineteen

4
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand subscribers, where I like to send emails about upcoming events,

5
00:00:14.480 --> 00:00:17.679
<v Speaker 1>upcoming shopping deals, keep you updated with all the stuff

6
00:00:17.719 --> 00:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>going on with my videos. Once that list reaches twenty thousand,

7
00:00:21.320 --> 00:00:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I will be doing a giveaway of another HF radio

8
00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sign up today and thank you for the support. Some

9
00:00:28.679 --> 00:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>more updates on DMR, What my thought process is behind DMR,

10
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:38.719
<v Speaker 1>What I do and don't like about DMR. My original

11
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:41.799
<v Speaker 1>video titled what is Wrong with DMR hawd a lot

12
00:00:41.840 --> 00:00:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of really good comments. In this video, we're going to

13
00:00:45.119 --> 00:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about one of those comments that was actually made

14
00:00:47.320 --> 00:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit after the fact, and I shared the video

15
00:00:50.679 --> 00:00:52.719
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit and a couple other things applied to some

16
00:00:52.799 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 1>other comments. And the original article that was about Brandmeister

17
00:00:57.359 --> 00:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not allowing you to create new talk groups anymore is

18
00:01:01.079 --> 00:01:02.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of what spawned this whole thing, and I had

19
00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>some thoughts on that, so I want to further address

20
00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>more questions, more thoughts I had. I said in the

21
00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:11.159
<v Speaker 1>first video that was going to make a part two,

22
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm thinking I probably will make up Part

23
00:01:13.319 --> 00:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>three at some point in time, but this is part two,

24
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about this right now. One thing that

25
00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I will say upfront, and I think I misspoke this

26
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first video. Okay, I was talking about the

27
00:01:28.120 --> 00:01:33.079
<v Speaker 1>security feature of not Someone was complaining about having to

28
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>upload a copy of your license to get a dMRI ID,

29
00:01:35.879 --> 00:01:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and I said, well, that's a security feature so that

30
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>nobody can register an ID for you. In that way,

31
00:01:39.799 --> 00:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody can use your ID. Well, what I meant was

32
00:01:43.599 --> 00:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think I said it wrong, So apologies for that.

33
00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But you have to upload a copy of your license

34
00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to radioid dot net to get a dMRI ID, a

35
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:56.719
<v Speaker 1>seven digit dMRI ID in your call sign name, so

36
00:01:56.840 --> 00:01:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that idea is registered to your call sign. The reason

37
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to upload a copy of your license is

38
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:05.879
<v Speaker 1>that so no one else can register an ID with

39
00:02:06.120 --> 00:02:08.319
<v Speaker 1>your call sign. Now, once that ID is out there,

40
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:11.759
<v Speaker 1>it's public domain. It's public information. Everyone's going to see

41
00:02:11.759 --> 00:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>it when you kee up on the DMR network anyway,

42
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So someone could take that ID and enter it into

43
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a radio of theirs and impersonate you the same way

44
00:02:18.960 --> 00:02:21.199
<v Speaker 1>they could do it on a WIRESX network with just

45
00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>inputting your call sign into their radio the same way

46
00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they could do it on a d Star network with

47
00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>putting your call sign into their radio. So the security

48
00:02:29.080 --> 00:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is not preventing someone from using your ID and their radio.

49
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The security is preventing someone from registering a new ID

50
00:02:37.719 --> 00:02:39.759
<v Speaker 1>under your call sign. So I wanted to make that

51
00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:43.039
<v Speaker 1>clear because I think I misspoke or I said that

52
00:02:43.080 --> 00:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first one, but I said it in a

53
00:02:44.599 --> 00:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>way that was unclear, So I apologize for that. Well,

54
00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this time today, we're going to talk a little bit

55
00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:54.719
<v Speaker 1>more about the DMR ID aspect and how out of

56
00:02:54.719 --> 00:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all the digital modes dr DMR is not the only

57
00:02:57.280 --> 00:02:59.719
<v Speaker 1>one that uses IDs instead of call signs. P twenty

58
00:02:59.719 --> 00:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>five uses IDs instead of call signs. NXDN uses IDs

59
00:03:03.319 --> 00:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of call signs. Okay, wirez X or a system

60
00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>fusion wires X and d Star use call signs. And

61
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:12.479
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, I think that we should try to

62
00:03:12.520 --> 00:03:16.719
<v Speaker 1>implement a DMR call sign exchange because here's the problem

63
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:19.039
<v Speaker 1>with Okay, let me, I'm getting ahead of myself. Now,

64
00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>let me go to this comment, and this is kind

65
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of where it started. This is a repeat of what

66
00:03:23.960 --> 00:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. DMR is probably the dumbest mode

67
00:03:26.680 --> 00:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in HIM radio for the simple fact that every call

68
00:03:28.280 --> 00:03:30.599
<v Speaker 1>sign needs a radio ID assigned for it to work

69
00:03:30.599 --> 00:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on any network. First of all, something I did not

70
00:03:33.639 --> 00:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>mention in the first video is that's an incorrect statement.

71
00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:39.919
<v Speaker 1>It does not need a radio ID to work on

72
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>any network. It needs a radio ID to work on

73
00:03:42.400 --> 00:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brandmeister network. And I gave a couple of points

74
00:03:45.560 --> 00:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in my first video about what I didn't like about Brandmeister,

75
00:03:48.599 --> 00:03:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk a little bit more about

76
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that in this video, so keep watching on that. Okay,

77
00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I can put any ID into my radio and key

78
00:03:56.319 --> 00:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>up on a sea bridge network and use it all

79
00:03:57.840 --> 00:04:03.199
<v Speaker 1>day long. There is no ID authentication parameter built into

80
00:04:03.240 --> 00:04:06.319
<v Speaker 1>a c bridge. It's built into Brandmeister. I don't know

81
00:04:06.360 --> 00:04:09.719
<v Speaker 1>if it's built into TGIF. If someone's familiar enough with

82
00:04:09.759 --> 00:04:13.479
<v Speaker 1>TGIF to acknowledge that to put a comment blow, I'd

83
00:04:13.520 --> 00:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>love to hear the thoughts on that. I would not

84
00:04:15.479 --> 00:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if it is built into TGIF, but I'm

85
00:04:18.720 --> 00:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I'm not sure. I didn't look that up,

86
00:04:20.959 --> 00:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't research that before this recording. But this

87
00:04:24.600 --> 00:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually required for Brand Meister. And again laid out

88
00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple of points why I don't like brandmeister in

89
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the first video, and I'm gonna do more of that

90
00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up, so let's go. My original reply to that was,

91
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>every digital mode needs this. D Starr and y sef

92
00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>use a call sign. DMR uses a number. If you

93
00:04:40.759 --> 00:04:42.439
<v Speaker 1>fail to enter any of those into your radio, you

94
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to transmit on a network. I don't

95
00:04:44.879 --> 00:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>see how DMR is any more complicated in others just

96
00:04:46.839 --> 00:04:48.959
<v Speaker 1>because it uses a number rather than your call sign.

97
00:04:49.040 --> 00:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>That was my original reply, and today's video is going

98
00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to sponsor. It's going to focus mostly on this reply

99
00:04:56.040 --> 00:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>from Zach lab. Now you can see this was twenty

100
00:04:58.759 --> 00:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>five days ago between that video. In the time, I've

101
00:05:01.560 --> 00:05:03.879
<v Speaker 1>traded some emails with this gentleman. Well, I didn't trade

102
00:05:03.879 --> 00:05:05.519
<v Speaker 1>emails with him, but we've gone back and forth in

103
00:05:05.560 --> 00:05:07.399
<v Speaker 1>here a little bit. I went to Orlando for a

104
00:05:07.399 --> 00:05:10.079
<v Speaker 1>whole week for himcashon and I've been busy with other stuff.

105
00:05:10.120 --> 00:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So but I know I wanted to make a video

106
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:16.399
<v Speaker 1>about this reply here. So he says, Jason, I'm jumping

107
00:05:16.399 --> 00:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in from your video. I was also an amateur and

108
00:05:18.439 --> 00:05:21.399
<v Speaker 1>DMR when it first was budding, sometime around twenty twenty ten.

109
00:05:21.439 --> 00:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm believe I had an XPR eighty three hundred even

110
00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:26.399
<v Speaker 1>before DMR mark came into existence. When we all did

111
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:29.519
<v Speaker 1>was local IP site connect and Ravennet systems hadn't even

112
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:31.639
<v Speaker 1>made the sea bridge. Okay, yeah, so that's that's kind

113
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of how the system in Texas started. Also, I wasn't

114
00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>part of it back then, but I did some research

115
00:05:36.879 --> 00:05:40.519
<v Speaker 1>a few years back, because I did a video at

116
00:05:40.519 --> 00:05:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the Tapper conference five or six years ago, calling and

117
00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I called it Understanding DMR Networks. So yes, I'm familiar

118
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with IP site Connect. I know a couple guys who

119
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.319
<v Speaker 1>still use it, so yeah, good to know there. I

120
00:05:52.399 --> 00:05:53.519
<v Speaker 1>used to be one of the few with a three

121
00:05:53.600 --> 00:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to five digit DMR mark ID because I wanted to

122
00:05:56.120 --> 00:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>use radios on both Connect Plus and HAM Radio. We

123
00:05:59.079 --> 00:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had some guys like that in our area as well.

124
00:06:03.000 --> 00:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the point being made, and the point I

125
00:06:04.639 --> 00:06:06.759
<v Speaker 1>would make myself, is that we're not just adding an

126
00:06:06.759 --> 00:06:08.439
<v Speaker 1>extra step and getting on the air. It's that we're

127
00:06:08.480 --> 00:06:11.079
<v Speaker 1>relying on a third party, a closed one that has

128
00:06:11.079 --> 00:06:14.079
<v Speaker 1>no governance or transparency to handle IDs for everybody. Okay,

129
00:06:14.079 --> 00:06:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I take a little bit issue with that, but let's

130
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>keep reading amateur specific modes use call signs exclusively as

131
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a now identifier something that has already been issued and

132
00:06:22.360 --> 00:06:26.079
<v Speaker 1>guarantee unique by government entities using their delegated authorities from

133
00:06:26.079 --> 00:06:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the ITU. There's a governing body, people smarter than us

134
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and before our time, that set a call sign fixes

135
00:06:31.800 --> 00:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in stone. It delegates prefixes to countries to let them

136
00:06:34.439 --> 00:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>use with subfixes they saw fit. With dMRI IDs, it's

137
00:06:37.839 --> 00:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>an extra step of another database registration. Worse yet, we're

138
00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>letting a private group of individuals control the hobby internationally

139
00:06:44.519 --> 00:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of us with no accountability. I don't

140
00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:48.959
<v Speaker 1>think DMR is more complated than the other modes because

141
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of this extra registration step, but on the reason of private,

142
00:06:52.279 --> 00:06:55.399
<v Speaker 1>unchecked control alone, I agree with the original poster that

143
00:06:55.480 --> 00:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>DMR and amateur radio is dumb. Okay, couple of things

144
00:06:59.240 --> 00:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on that number one, first and foremost, Okay, welcome to

145
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the planet. Okay, everything in the world works this way.

146
00:07:07.560 --> 00:07:11.759
<v Speaker 1>If someone creates something, or invents something, or discovers something,

147
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:17.199
<v Speaker 1>or brings an aspect of this topic into a new group,

148
00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:20.319
<v Speaker 1>they set up a new way to do this, and

149
00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the control aspects and the preferences and the parameters by

150
00:07:24.240 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>which people use the system is set up by the

151
00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:31.079
<v Speaker 1>original founders or original implementers of that system. I mean,

152
00:07:31.120 --> 00:07:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying. Okay, I get what you're saying,

153
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But I why is that an issue? Okay? Why is

154
00:07:37.240 --> 00:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that an issue? Those guys DMR mark was the first

155
00:07:40.199 --> 00:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to create an assigned registration of IDs in DMR and

156
00:07:45.120 --> 00:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>amateur radio, and I wish and it's kind of a

157
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>stupid thing. You have to understand that DMR was not

158
00:07:52.879 --> 00:07:55.079
<v Speaker 1>originally designed to use it the way we use it

159
00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in amateur radio. It was a design for close quarters use.

160
00:07:59.319 --> 00:08:01.879
<v Speaker 1>The guys ATMAR never really intended it to have like

161
00:08:02.000 --> 00:08:04.839
<v Speaker 1>nationwide and worldwide talk groups. They never really intended to

162
00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:08.279
<v Speaker 1>key up repeaters across such a large area. They intended

163
00:08:08.279 --> 00:08:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it to be used in buildings maybe, and by companies

164
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or schools all within a certain city or county or state,

165
00:08:15.399 --> 00:08:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and you could kind of link everyone together with talk groups,

166
00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you had maybe a dozen talk groups.

167
00:08:20.199 --> 00:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have thousands of talk groups in DMR

168
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in amateur radio, and I dare say most of them

169
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:28.759
<v Speaker 1>don't get used. But the point is that this number

170
00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:32.799
<v Speaker 1>registration was it was obvious that when they implemented this

171
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>number registration, it was never meant to assign those numbers

172
00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to thousands of people, to hundreds of thousands of people.

173
00:08:39.159 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>It was meant for a more of a close quarters

174
00:08:42.279 --> 00:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>communications system. So I would love to see an upgradeed

175
00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:49.159
<v Speaker 1>DMR to where it implements alpha numeric numbers instead of

176
00:08:49.200 --> 00:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>just numeric numbers. Because as of right now, we basically,

177
00:08:52.639 --> 00:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>since your repeater IDs and your talk group IDs are

178
00:08:56.360 --> 00:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>only up to six digits, okay, basically, you only have

179
00:09:00.120 --> 00:09:03.759
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand and six digit IDs that can exist. Okay,

180
00:09:03.840 --> 00:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So from zero zero zero zero zero through nine nine nine,

181
00:09:08.720 --> 00:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's one hundred thousand different IDs. So and all repeater

182
00:09:12.120 --> 00:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>IDs are six digits, so you've only got six You've

183
00:09:15.320 --> 00:09:17.879
<v Speaker 1>only got one hundred thousand of those that can exist

184
00:09:17.919 --> 00:09:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Even more stringent than that is, all

185
00:09:20.440 --> 00:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the repeaters in the United States, maybe in North

186
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:25.759
<v Speaker 1>America start with a three to one, so that limits

187
00:09:25.799 --> 00:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it even more. Okay, so you're gonna run out of

188
00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>IDs and talk group numbers at a certain point in

189
00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>time because guess what, there's just a limited system. If

190
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we had alpha numeric we could combat that issue, and

191
00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:40.279
<v Speaker 1>we could assign call signs, which are already alphanumeric. Case

192
00:09:40.399 --> 00:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>five HWB is an alpha numeric call sign, and we

193
00:09:43.120 --> 00:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>could implement that, and we could start naming. We could

194
00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:48.399
<v Speaker 1>start putting IDs or call signs into radios, We could

195
00:09:48.480 --> 00:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>start putting call signs into repeaters and in the different

196
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>parameters and everything like that. So I would be one

197
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:57.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent in favor of something like that. But the

198
00:09:57.480 --> 00:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>original point mentioned see this, This is zach Labs guy.

199
00:10:01.240 --> 00:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>He's getting off in a little bit of a tangent here,

200
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's not that I really disagree with what he's saying,

201
00:10:06.519 --> 00:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But the original point was that the original poster made

202
00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>DMR's ID because you have to use a number or

203
00:10:13.399 --> 00:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you get blocked in the network. Well, first of all,

204
00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:17.639
<v Speaker 1>as I said a minute ago, that's not actually true.

205
00:10:17.679 --> 00:10:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's only true on Brandmeister. I can input a number

206
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and use it on seabridge all day long. I can

207
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>input the number one two, three foot five and use

208
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it on seabridge all day long. There's nothing on the

209
00:10:26.519 --> 00:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>sea bridge that blocks unregistered numbers. Because the sea bridge

210
00:10:32.639 --> 00:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is not tied physically or virtually to RADIOID dot net

211
00:10:36.639 --> 00:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. I can take I can do a data

212
00:10:39.159 --> 00:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>dump from radioid dot net and load it into my

213
00:10:41.720 --> 00:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sea bridge, or I can just delete everything out of

214
00:10:44.840 --> 00:10:47.039
<v Speaker 1>my sea bridge as far as radio IDs go, and

215
00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>people can use it with whatever radios or whatever ID

216
00:10:50.279 --> 00:10:52.759
<v Speaker 1>they have. Okay, there's nothing on a sea bridge that

217
00:10:52.799 --> 00:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>limits that. Brandmeister limits it. But again, in the first video,

218
00:10:56.399 --> 00:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I talked about several things I didn't like about Brandmeister,

219
00:10:58.799 --> 00:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna e on that in later video. So

220
00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:03.799
<v Speaker 1>again I see where you're coming from, but you're you're

221
00:11:03.879 --> 00:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of you're taking it in a different direction than

222
00:11:06.720 --> 00:11:10.919
<v Speaker 1>what the original comment said and what I was replying

223
00:11:10.960 --> 00:11:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to with that video. He goes on to say, down

224
00:11:13.399 --> 00:11:16.519
<v Speaker 1>here he gives a brief history which I already knew all

225
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about how DMR mark came into existence. They

226
00:11:19.720 --> 00:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>had dci K four, USD Turbo six NorCal NJ Turbo

227
00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>n E D E c N. I wasn't familiar with that,

228
00:11:27.279 --> 00:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that one following right behind us would tell their

229
00:11:29.600 --> 00:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>areas to use the same IDs from DMR Mark. DMR

230
00:11:32.080 --> 00:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark m a RC is the Motorola Amateure Radio Club.

231
00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Motorola likes to tell you they invented DMR they didn't.

232
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:41.039
<v Speaker 1>They were one of the early adopters of DMR, and

233
00:11:41.080 --> 00:11:44.919
<v Speaker 1>they added IP site connect to the repeaters, which is

234
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an addition to the layer of DMR,

235
00:11:47.879 --> 00:11:50.399
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't invent DMR. DMR is an open standard

236
00:11:50.879 --> 00:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>developed by European Telecommunications in two thousand and five. I

237
00:11:54.159 --> 00:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think it was Motorola was an early adopter of DMR,

238
00:11:57.480 --> 00:11:59.399
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't invent it. So he goes on here

239
00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about how the history of the DMR mark

240
00:12:01.879 --> 00:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>IDs was used, and then this paragraph right here is interesting.

241
00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>DMR mark was using usids starting with the elevens instead of

242
00:12:08.559 --> 00:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty one's. Was also about the time GDPR came into play.

243
00:12:11.759 --> 00:12:15.519
<v Speaker 1>That's when Brandmeister made his fuss, made a fuss about both. Eventually,

244
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, DMR mark CCS seven let Brandmeister take over,

245
00:12:19.799 --> 00:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's talk about Radio ID. Yeah, take

246
00:12:21.759 --> 00:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>over and have their way with RADIOID dot net. But

247
00:12:23.879 --> 00:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the same problem again. Brandmeister is controlled by Select

248
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>FOREW who ran Fast Forwards. No real governess, no transparency,

249
00:12:29.600 --> 00:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>another private group of individuals controlling to hobby internationally. Why

250
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:36.399
<v Speaker 1>would you jump from a leaking ship right onto another

251
00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:38.159
<v Speaker 1>one that's going to take the same water again in

252
00:12:38.159 --> 00:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the future. Okay, well, my first video once again was

253
00:12:41.639 --> 00:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about how I didn't like brandmeister. So I don't know

254
00:12:45.519 --> 00:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>who you're arguing with right here, but I mean, I

255
00:12:49.519 --> 00:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>see what you're saying. I do disagree with you, but

256
00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you're not arguing a point that I made. Okay,

257
00:12:53.879 --> 00:12:55.519
<v Speaker 1>another thing he says up here, there was never any

258
00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>governance or transparency, just a good old boys club who

259
00:12:58.039 --> 00:13:00.399
<v Speaker 1>took all the chairs because they got to the party first. Again,

260
00:13:00.440 --> 00:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I must state, welcome to the planet. That's how everything works.

261
00:13:04.399 --> 00:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything in the history of the world works that way,

262
00:13:06.440 --> 00:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's good, bad, right or wrong. I'm not saying

263
00:13:08.159 --> 00:13:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that's how it works. The people who

264
00:13:09.919 --> 00:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get their first set up parameters, and everybody else uses

265
00:13:12.320 --> 00:13:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that parameter until someone else comes along and says we

266
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>should update this and change it, which I would be

267
00:13:17.559 --> 00:13:19.919
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent in favor of. I have no problem

268
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:22.759
<v Speaker 1>with that. But the but the fact of registering a

269
00:13:22.840 --> 00:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>dmr ID and using it in your radio to get

270
00:13:25.559 --> 00:13:27.919
<v Speaker 1>onto a network is not It's not a hard and

271
00:13:27.960 --> 00:13:31.279
<v Speaker 1>complicated process. It's not really a good old boys network

272
00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>because guess what anyone can read. All you have to

273
00:13:33.559 --> 00:13:37.279
<v Speaker 1>do is have a valid amateur radio call sign and

274
00:13:37.399 --> 00:13:40.039
<v Speaker 1>upload a copyer license, which again I think you should

275
00:13:40.039 --> 00:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>already have. I made that point in the first video,

276
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not gonna make it again. Okay, I think

277
00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you are should already. I think everyone should have a

278
00:13:45.919 --> 00:13:49.519
<v Speaker 1>copy of their amateur radio license and have it displayed

279
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in their hamshack or the vehicle, or one in your pocket. Okay,

280
00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:55.039
<v Speaker 1>So again I'm not going to go into that again.

281
00:13:55.080 --> 00:13:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But that is I don't understand why it's so difficult

282
00:13:58.919 --> 00:14:01.919
<v Speaker 1>to use an ID instead of a call sign. So

283
00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>he goes on to talk about p twenty five here

284
00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:05.279
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, and I want to read a couple

285
00:14:05.360 --> 00:14:07.159
<v Speaker 1>of the things he says there. Again, I don't really

286
00:14:07.159 --> 00:14:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really arguing with this person, this zach Labs person, don't.

287
00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's wrong, He's just taken it in

288
00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>a different direction than what I was originally talking about. First,

289
00:14:17.639 --> 00:14:19.679
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you about today's sponsor. Once again, we're

290
00:14:19.679 --> 00:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sponsoring light Me earbuds. These are these over the ear earbuds.

291
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They sent me a new set called a Cozy Fit

292
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:30.399
<v Speaker 1>g One. This is a brand new addition to their lineup.

293
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>They have open ear noise reduction of reducing noise by

294
00:14:34.039 --> 00:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>negative fifteen dB. They're lightweight and comfortable. I've been wearing

295
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:40.799
<v Speaker 1>them during this whole video. They're about zero point two

296
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to three ounces each. I've been wearing them during this

297
00:14:43.039 --> 00:14:44.879
<v Speaker 1>whole video. I can I cannot even tell they're there.

298
00:14:44.879 --> 00:14:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I can see him in the camera, but I can't.

299
00:14:46.679 --> 00:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't even really tell her there. They have advanced

300
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Bluetooth five Dot four delivers excellent audio quality, and they

301
00:14:53.039 --> 00:14:56.799
<v Speaker 1>are IP x four splash proof rated, so that sweat

302
00:14:56.919 --> 00:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or a little bit of rain gets on him. It's

303
00:14:58.600 --> 00:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be a big deal again. I said in

304
00:15:00.519 --> 00:15:03.519
<v Speaker 1>the first video that they sponsored that had I had

305
00:15:03.519 --> 00:15:05.279
<v Speaker 1>some inner earbuds I've used for a long time, and

306
00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I still have those. Sometimes I listen to those earbuds.

307
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:09.559
<v Speaker 1>I listen to YouTube or something when I'm in the

308
00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:11.559
<v Speaker 1>deer stand. I want to try to be quiet. But

309
00:15:11.639 --> 00:15:13.799
<v Speaker 1>after they've been in your ear for two or three hours,

310
00:15:13.919 --> 00:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they kind of start to hurt a little bit.

311
00:15:15.639 --> 00:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to take them out. These sit on top

312
00:15:17.240 --> 00:15:20.039
<v Speaker 1>of the ear. I can hear them right now. They

313
00:15:20.120 --> 00:15:23.519
<v Speaker 1>sound great, and they work really well. So check out

314
00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:25.519
<v Speaker 1>the link of the description low from light me l

315
00:15:25.559 --> 00:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a l YTMI for the Cozy Fit G one version

316
00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of their earbuds. Thank you like me for sponsoring this

317
00:15:33.159 --> 00:15:36.559
<v Speaker 1>video right here. Basically his last kind of thought process

318
00:15:36.600 --> 00:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>here was I don't use DMR anymore if I can

319
00:15:38.759 --> 00:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>help it. When I do, it's usually for a public

320
00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>service event. We're use local repeaters directly linked to each

321
00:15:43.159 --> 00:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>other with iPSC or similar no bridges involved. I use

322
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>an ID issued by non amsure system, not even a

323
00:15:49.639 --> 00:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>less than FIVEG it issued by DMR, Mark Brandmeister. Brandmeister

324
00:15:53.960 --> 00:15:56.039
<v Speaker 1>does an issue id's you talk about radioid dot net

325
00:15:56.080 --> 00:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and Glenn at radioid dot net doesn't have anything to

326
00:15:58.039 --> 00:16:03.039
<v Speaker 1>do with Brandmeister directly, although Brandmeister does limit the people

327
00:16:03.679 --> 00:16:07.519
<v Speaker 1>that can use their network. But again, get me started

328
00:16:07.559 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on how much I don't like Brandmeister. Okay, so you

329
00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:12.559
<v Speaker 1>don't have that problem with the sea bridge. Now, this

330
00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>right here is a little bit I don't want to

331
00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>call I don't want to say hypocritical, but I think

332
00:16:16.519 --> 00:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it kind of shoots yourself in the foot right here.

333
00:16:18.360 --> 00:16:20.519
<v Speaker 1>I still use P twenty five to this day, before

334
00:16:20.559 --> 00:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the XDS clone amateurs used to use whatever numeric ID

335
00:16:23.279 --> 00:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for amateur radio since Astros P twenty five supported Astroid's

336
00:16:26.600 --> 00:16:28.879
<v Speaker 1>soft id's around the same time. Do you mark mente existence.

337
00:16:29.519 --> 00:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been using that to transmit call sign over the air,

338
00:16:31.879 --> 00:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which not only solves ID but also means the numeric

339
00:16:34.240 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ID doesn't even matter anymore. So you can totally do

340
00:16:36.799 --> 00:16:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that over a sea bridge. Now you're probably gonna get

341
00:16:39.600 --> 00:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>people coming back to you and say, dude, your id's

342
00:16:41.360 --> 00:16:43.679
<v Speaker 1>not right, just like I made a video a while

343
00:16:43.679 --> 00:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>back about calling a QRZ on a PODA and never

344
00:16:46.279 --> 00:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ID properly. So that's gonna be a thing if you

345
00:16:48.960 --> 00:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>don't use a proper ID. But the point is that

346
00:16:52.080 --> 00:16:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you're not blocked by a sea bridge if you use

347
00:16:54.879 --> 00:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a five digit connect plus ID or just some made

348
00:16:57.440 --> 00:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>up random number. The C bridge does not block you.

349
00:17:00.759 --> 00:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Brandmeister blocks you, but not the seed bridge. Okay, he says,

350
00:17:04.559 --> 00:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I never really use d star a fusion, But DMR

351
00:17:06.839 --> 00:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>remains the only amateur LMR mode where you can transmit

352
00:17:09.200 --> 00:17:12.319
<v Speaker 1>an Alphameric where you can't transmit an Alpha America ID

353
00:17:12.440 --> 00:17:14.079
<v Speaker 1>for a call sign alongside with your voice calls. That's

354
00:17:14.079 --> 00:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason on top of privately controlled numbering makes me

355
00:17:16.279 --> 00:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>feel d MAR is not well suited for the amateur

356
00:17:18.319 --> 00:17:20.559
<v Speaker 1>radio to begin with. Okay, you know what, I don't

357
00:17:20.559 --> 00:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, but I understand what you're saying. I

358
00:17:22.759 --> 00:17:27.039
<v Speaker 1>understand what you're saying there. That's fine. Somewhere else in

359
00:17:27.079 --> 00:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this article, somewhere, this is the same article I had

360
00:17:29.519 --> 00:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the last video. Somewhere else in this article, someone mentioned, well,

361
00:17:32.759 --> 00:17:35.279
<v Speaker 1>since you're transmitting your call sign on system Fusion and

362
00:17:35.359 --> 00:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>d STAR, you don't have to ID. That's not true.

363
00:17:37.880 --> 00:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. When digital voice modes first came around,

364
00:17:42.319 --> 00:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it was and especially Fusion, because Fusion is twelve and

365
00:17:45.920 --> 00:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>a half killer hurts and if you use digital narrow

366
00:17:48.240 --> 00:17:51.039
<v Speaker 1>DN mode, then it puts it splits it into two

367
00:17:51.160 --> 00:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>six point twenty five killer hertz channels, and it uses

368
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>voice for one of those channels, and it transmits your

369
00:17:57.720 --> 00:18:01.319
<v Speaker 1>GPS and call sign on the second channel. Okay, DMR

370
00:18:01.440 --> 00:18:04.799
<v Speaker 1>uses voice for bow channels. That's why it's more efficient

371
00:18:05.440 --> 00:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>with the use of a frequency. So now you can

372
00:18:07.400 --> 00:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have a repeater with two different conversations going on and

373
00:18:09.920 --> 00:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>only one registered frequency pair for your repeater. Okay, Fusion

374
00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:17.519
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do that. Fusion uses digital narrowde primarily, but you

375
00:18:17.519 --> 00:18:19.839
<v Speaker 1>can use VW, which is voice wide, which so your

376
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>voice takes up the entire twelve and a half killer

377
00:18:21.640 --> 00:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>her it's narrowband spectrum. But on regular digital narrow mode

378
00:18:25.559 --> 00:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you have half voice and half GPS and data transmissions

379
00:18:28.640 --> 00:18:31.079
<v Speaker 1>which includes your call sign. But the FCC a while

380
00:18:31.119 --> 00:18:33.799
<v Speaker 1>back said no, that's not a valid ID. You still

381
00:18:33.839 --> 00:18:37.559
<v Speaker 1>have to verbally id yourself on system fusion. Do people

382
00:18:37.640 --> 00:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>do it? I don't know. I don't really care. Okay,

383
00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:41.799
<v Speaker 1>but if you're saying, well, we don't need to do

384
00:18:41.839 --> 00:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that anymore because we're transmitting our call sign, that's just

385
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:46.559
<v Speaker 1>a state that that's a false statement. That is just

386
00:18:46.599 --> 00:18:49.039
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not true. But I understand what you're saying. I

387
00:18:49.079 --> 00:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>understand what you're saying. I don't necessarily disagree with what

388
00:18:52.880 --> 00:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. Again, I think you took it in a

389
00:18:54.759 --> 00:19:00.559
<v Speaker 1>different direction that I was originally replying to. And okay,

390
00:19:00.680 --> 00:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but I would be one hundred percent in favor of

391
00:19:03.440 --> 00:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>updating DMR somehow, somehow in amateur radio, implementing a new

392
00:19:09.160 --> 00:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>phase in a DMR where you can use alpha numeric IDs,

393
00:19:12.160 --> 00:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and in implementing call signs, I would be totally, totally

394
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fine with that. Again, my original point was, you still

395
00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:20.599
<v Speaker 1>need that call sign in your radio to transmit over

396
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a d Star network or over a wires X network. Okay,

397
00:19:24.279 --> 00:19:26.839
<v Speaker 1>not over a fusion repeater. There's a difference there. Over

398
00:19:26.880 --> 00:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the wires X network and over a d Star network,

399
00:19:29.400 --> 00:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you still have to have a valid call sign in

400
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>your radio. So in DMR you have to have a

401
00:19:34.759 --> 00:19:38.599
<v Speaker 1>valid ID number to transmit over Brand Meister, but on

402
00:19:38.640 --> 00:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a sea bridge it doesn't matter. And I've got a

403
00:19:40.680 --> 00:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>whole video. I've got a talk I created like six

404
00:19:44.039 --> 00:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago that compares DMR DMR networks and it talks

405
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>about the C bridge versus Brandmeister versus DMR plus versus

406
00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tgi F versus a couple other things. I mean, I

407
00:19:53.680 --> 00:19:55.279
<v Speaker 1>try to I try to be as opening to my

408
00:19:55.319 --> 00:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>audience as I can, but I've never liked Brandmeister. I

409
00:19:57.720 --> 00:19:59.279
<v Speaker 1>still don't like it today, and I've got a bunch

410
00:19:59.279 --> 00:20:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of points about why I think Seabridge versus Brandmeister Seabridge

411
00:20:03.279 --> 00:20:05.839
<v Speaker 1>is better. So maybe I'll make an update. Would you

412
00:20:05.960 --> 00:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>like to see an update to that video? What do

413
00:20:07.920 --> 00:20:10.599
<v Speaker 1>you guys think about this? Do you think the ID

414
00:20:10.839 --> 00:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>system and quite frankly, I've been I've been in DMR

415
00:20:13.480 --> 00:20:17.759
<v Speaker 1>for about twelve years now, and I've not really ever

416
00:20:17.960 --> 00:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>heard any grumbling about people not wanting to do DMR

417
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:27.079
<v Speaker 1>just because of the ID. I've hear a plethra of excuses,

418
00:20:27.839 --> 00:20:31.079
<v Speaker 1>many excuses about why people don't like DMR. Some of

419
00:20:31.119 --> 00:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>them are valid, some of them not so much. But

420
00:20:34.279 --> 00:20:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I hear a lot of excuses, but I don't remember

421
00:20:36.359 --> 00:20:40.559
<v Speaker 1>ever hearing the ID being a huge issue. So what

422
00:20:40.640 --> 00:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think? Are you not using DMR because

423
00:20:42.960 --> 00:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to register an ID? Is that your reasoning?

424
00:20:45.759 --> 00:20:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I would like to hear from you. I would like

425
00:20:47.079 --> 00:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear how many people actually think that put a

426
00:20:49.519 --> 00:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>comet blow. Thanks for watching today.
