WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I've had people say they want me to

2
00:00:03.120 --> 00:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>get at least two good Charles CW. Cook rants out

3
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of you with a Molly Coddle in each one or

4
00:00:10.119 --> 00:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>something or it's equivalent.

5
00:00:11.400 --> 00:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm trying to find some what that mocks me out.

6
00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Ask not what your country can do for you, Ask

7
00:00:20.359 --> 00:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>what you can do for your country.

8
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Mister Gorbacho, tear down this wall. It's the Ricochet Podcast.

9
00:00:30.079 --> 00:00:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hayward sitting in the host chair today, joined by a.

10
00:00:33.479 --> 00:00:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Recovered Charles CW. Cook. So let's have ourselves a podcast.

11
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:42.439
<v Speaker 4>And you know, it's not like I agree with everything

12
00:00:43.039 --> 00:00:47.079
<v Speaker 4>the administration does. So it's like there's I mean, I

13
00:00:47.079 --> 00:00:49.799
<v Speaker 4>agree with much of what the administration does, but we

14
00:00:49.880 --> 00:00:51.039
<v Speaker 4>have differences of opinion.

15
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So then I'm a little.

16
00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:55.679
<v Speaker 4>Stuck in a bind where I'm like, well, I don't

17
00:00:55.679 --> 00:00:58.719
<v Speaker 4>want to, you know, speak up against the administration, but

18
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to also don't want to take responsibility

19
00:01:03.640 --> 00:01:05.000
<v Speaker 4>for the administrations doing.

20
00:01:05.359 --> 00:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everybody to the Ricochet Podcast, number seven hundred and

21
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>forty four. It's Steve Hayward sitting in for James Lilax today,

22
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:15.079
<v Speaker 1>who is comforting somewhere over in the wilds of Italy.

23
00:01:15.719 --> 00:01:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I am in the North Atlantic, where it is snowing

24
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:21.879
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. I'm so far north, but I'm pleased

25
00:01:21.879 --> 00:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that we are joined by the fast recovering Charles C. W. Cook,

26
00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>who's been down with the bubonic plague or something like that. Charles,

27
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:33.719
<v Speaker 1>how are you feeling and what have you been going

28
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>through the last couple of weeks?

29
00:01:35.359 --> 00:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>A man, I don't quite know what it is. I

30
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>thought it was strap because I work up with a

31
00:01:40.519 --> 00:01:44.719
<v Speaker 2>horrendous razor blade esque sore throat, and then it wasn't

32
00:01:44.719 --> 00:01:46.799
<v Speaker 2>strapped because that went away pretty quickly. But all these

33
00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:48.879
<v Speaker 2>other symptoms came along and now I have what is

34
00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>really a glorified cold. That's the best part thus far

35
00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:55.560
<v Speaker 2>of my journey. I feel like I'm on the exit ramp. Aha.

36
00:01:56.599 --> 00:01:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, sounds like I'm about to put to sea. When

37
00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the sound of that horn blowing in the background, I don't.

38
00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Know if you heard that or not.

39
00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:06.439
<v Speaker 2>On the exit round then no, I am not right.

40
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Well you sound good, Charles, so it's good to hear

41
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>your voice again. I don't know whether you've been, you know,

42
00:02:12.039 --> 00:02:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in bed, in your cozy your sheets, perhaps avoiding all

43
00:02:15.759 --> 00:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the news, but The thing that is amazing me, and

44
00:02:19.719 --> 00:02:23.039
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone is the I think what some people

45
00:02:23.039 --> 00:02:26.479
<v Speaker 1>thought was the inevitable divorce of Donald Trump and Elon

46
00:02:26.599 --> 00:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk has finally occurred.

47
00:02:28.400 --> 00:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Who knew that the long prospected civil war.

48
00:02:31.639 --> 00:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>For America would turn out to be between the forces

49
00:02:34.159 --> 00:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of Duke Elon of Musk against the Viscount Donald of

50
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trump Landia. But here we are, and I don't know

51
00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:44.479
<v Speaker 1>where you want to start. I'll give you one of

52
00:02:44.479 --> 00:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>my opening observations, which is I long expected something like

53
00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:50.159
<v Speaker 1>this for reasons that I think are obvious but maybe

54
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>are worth discussing. But one of the blows that Musk

55
00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:57.479
<v Speaker 1>threw down, which I thought was quite outrageous, was saying

56
00:02:58.080 --> 00:02:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump is.

57
00:02:58.719 --> 00:02:59.680
<v Speaker 3>In the Epstein.

58
00:03:00.879 --> 00:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

59
00:03:01.759 --> 00:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'll say this, I don't think there

60
00:03:04.120 --> 00:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>are any Epstein files or an Epstein list, or if

61
00:03:06.680 --> 00:03:09.319
<v Speaker 1>there was one, it was long ago destroyed and recreating

62
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it is a difficult thing. And second, if there was

63
00:03:12.479 --> 00:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>such a list, I don't know how Elon Musk would

64
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:17.319
<v Speaker 1>know who was on it. So that's my first observation,

65
00:03:17.599 --> 00:03:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and then I have several. But I want to hear

66
00:03:20.199 --> 00:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you have to say about this? Which I'm

67
00:03:22.120 --> 00:03:23.719
<v Speaker 1>sure you may have expected.

68
00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>To well, unless that is true, which, for the reason

69
00:03:28.199 --> 00:03:31.039
<v Speaker 2>jee outline strikes me as very unlikely. That is a

70
00:03:31.080 --> 00:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>truly outrageous thing for Musk to have said, and we

71
00:03:34.599 --> 00:03:37.319
<v Speaker 2>ought not to lose sight of that, purely because the

72
00:03:37.439 --> 00:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>drama is so interesting. You just do not accuse people

73
00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>of being a sex criminal in the midst of an

74
00:03:44.879 --> 00:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>argument for giggles, I think that Musk is on a

75
00:03:52.439 --> 00:03:57.319
<v Speaker 2>manic episode. I mean, the closest analogue that I can

76
00:03:57.360 --> 00:04:01.319
<v Speaker 2>find to the last twenty four hours of Musk is

77
00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Kanye West.

78
00:04:02.840 --> 00:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Now.

79
00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I say that as somebody who admires Musk in many ways,

80
00:04:05.599 --> 00:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>as a great American eccentric inventor of a long line

81
00:04:10.439 --> 00:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of such people, all of whom are crazy. But the

82
00:04:16.680 --> 00:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>behavior yesterday struck me as being redolent of someone who

83
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>has got to be in his bonnet and is now

84
00:04:23.959 --> 00:04:26.279
<v Speaker 2>looking for any weapon at hand. In the course of

85
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:32.279
<v Speaker 2>yesterday's trade, Musk suggested that Donald Trump is a sex

86
00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:35.959
<v Speaker 2>criminal and is on the Epstein list. He said that

87
00:04:36.000 --> 00:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>he was going to dismantle SpaceX's program. He said that

88
00:04:42.319 --> 00:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>he wanted Donald No, he didn't say, that's not fair.

89
00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>He retweeted the suggestion that Trump be impeached and replaced

90
00:04:51.160 --> 00:04:56.920
<v Speaker 2>with JD. Vance. I mean, these are extreme rhetorical positions

91
00:04:56.920 --> 00:04:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to take, and he just did it one by one,

92
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:01.319
<v Speaker 2>and I think it just struck me as being manic.

93
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, now, if I have this right, he made

94
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>his formal exit a week or more ago, which I

95
00:05:08.120 --> 00:05:09.959
<v Speaker 1>think was on the way anyway. I mean, he was

96
00:05:09.959 --> 00:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a temporary government employee, and there's

97
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like specified in the law of how long you can

98
00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be such a person with aut all kinds of complications happening.

99
00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But then it was shortly after that he criticized the

100
00:05:22.759 --> 00:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>big Beautiful bill for I think rightly. I think you'll

101
00:05:26.759 --> 00:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>agree that that it didn't cut down the deficit. That's

102
00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:31.319
<v Speaker 1>really uh. I forget what he called it a travesty

103
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.519
<v Speaker 1>or worse, And it seems to be Charles. He's right

104
00:05:34.600 --> 00:05:36.879
<v Speaker 1>about that, isn't he. I mean, we talked about this

105
00:05:36.920 --> 00:05:39.399
<v Speaker 1>before and should say more about it, but that seemed

106
00:05:39.439 --> 00:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to set off Trump.

107
00:05:40.560 --> 00:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>One caveat with that. I think he is right about that.

108
00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump doesn't care about spending, he doesn't want to

109
00:05:45.639 --> 00:05:49.199
<v Speaker 2>reform entitlements, and he has different political imperatives than Musk

110
00:05:49.319 --> 00:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Musk is more of a free marketeer. But the one

111
00:05:52.839 --> 00:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>thing Musk has done on this that I found irritating

112
00:05:55.920 --> 00:06:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Steve is that he will not say aloud the truth

113
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>about our fiscal problems. He will not say that this

114
00:06:06.839 --> 00:06:13.000
<v Speaker 2>is being caused by unfunded entitlements, that without reforming Social

115
00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Security or Medicare, you cannot fix the budget. He's still saying,

116
00:06:17.160 --> 00:06:20.639
<v Speaker 2>as he did throughout his fora with Doge, that this

117
00:06:20.720 --> 00:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>is the question of pork. That's the word he used

118
00:06:23.079 --> 00:06:25.600
<v Speaker 2>in his tweet criticizing the bill.

119
00:06:26.199 --> 00:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Pork.

120
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>No, there is pork, of course there is. There is

121
00:06:29.399 --> 00:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>discretionary spending that should be cut. There's also some ways

122
00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:33.920
<v Speaker 2>for auden abuse, although there's not that much of it.

123
00:06:34.120 --> 00:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>There's also spending that the executive controls, as in, for example,

124
00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:41.279
<v Speaker 2>USAID that absolutely should be cut by a Republican administration.

125
00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>But that's not why we're hurtling off the cliff. We're

126
00:06:43.639 --> 00:06:46.399
<v Speaker 2>hurtling off the cliff because however much we raise taxes,

127
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:52.040
<v Speaker 2>we cannot outpace the growth in Social Security and Medicare.

128
00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:54.879
<v Speaker 2>And it's just telling to me that Musk won't say

129
00:06:54.920 --> 00:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>that either. In that sense, he's being Trumpian while criticizing Trump.

130
00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:01.319
<v Speaker 2>But generally, yes, I am on Musk side with this question.

131
00:07:01.439 --> 00:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was a good warm up rant, Charles. Listeners

132
00:07:05.680 --> 00:07:09.639
<v Speaker 1>will appreciate that you clearly your vigor is returning in

133
00:07:09.680 --> 00:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a rapid clip. Well, let's linger on this for a minute.

134
00:07:13.759 --> 00:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought one notable event of the last ten days

135
00:07:16.399 --> 00:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>was Jamie Diamond, the very capable chairman of JP Morgan.

136
00:07:20.439 --> 00:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's remember JP Morgan is one of the only big

137
00:07:22.839 --> 00:07:25.279
<v Speaker 1>banks that was not in serious trouble back in two

138
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:28.079
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, and I think Diamond deserves a lot

139
00:07:28.079 --> 00:07:28.759
<v Speaker 1>of credit for that.

140
00:07:29.040 --> 00:07:33.160
<v Speaker 3>As any CEO should. And he's a Democrat.

141
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:35.639
<v Speaker 1>He was widely rumored to have been on a short

142
00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>list to be Treasury Secretary for either candidate, but especially

143
00:07:39.920 --> 00:07:43.839
<v Speaker 1>if we had had God forbid President Harris. And he

144
00:07:43.959 --> 00:07:45.879
<v Speaker 1>made this speech last week out at the Rank and

145
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Library significantly perhaps that Gosh.

146
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>We can't keep going on like this.

147
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:55.399
<v Speaker 1>The spending is so far out of control and the

148
00:07:55.439 --> 00:07:58.399
<v Speaker 1>debt is piling up so fast that sooner or later,

149
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:00.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think he said he thought sooner the bond

150
00:08:00.319 --> 00:08:02.839
<v Speaker 1>market was going to make this clear. Yeah, I guess

151
00:08:02.839 --> 00:08:04.839
<v Speaker 1>my gloomy view has been all along is nothing is

152
00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:07.399
<v Speaker 1>going to happen until we have a crisis, at which

153
00:08:07.399 --> 00:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>point the solutions will all be much worse than what

154
00:08:10.120 --> 00:08:13.279
<v Speaker 1>could be done now, no matter how difficult things are now.

155
00:08:13.399 --> 00:08:16.319
<v Speaker 2>I think that's exactly right. It's also worth noting that

156
00:08:16.360 --> 00:08:18.319
<v Speaker 2>while that crisis might come in the form of a

157
00:08:18.360 --> 00:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>rebellion within the bond market, there are automatic cuts to

158
00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:25.279
<v Speaker 2>social Security that will kick in if we don't fix this.

159
00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>So some of the rhetoric you hear, especially from the Democrats,

160
00:08:28.959 --> 00:08:33.360
<v Speaker 2>that we should not do anything. Hillary Clinton said when

161
00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:36.559
<v Speaker 2>she was running for president we should decrease the age

162
00:08:36.759 --> 00:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of which one is eligible for Social Security and Medicare.

163
00:08:39.919 --> 00:08:43.559
<v Speaker 2>That is certainly a popular idea among the Alexandria Acasia

164
00:08:43.639 --> 00:08:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Cortes types. Well, that's not an option that is not

165
00:08:48.240 --> 00:08:52.399
<v Speaker 2>going to happen. If we do nothing, we don't move

166
00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:55.879
<v Speaker 2>into sunlit uplands in which everyone keeps getting Social Security

167
00:08:55.879 --> 00:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>in Medicare, and we just risk some sort of default

168
00:08:59.320 --> 00:09:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the law asset stands that would have to be executed

169
00:09:02.200 --> 00:09:04.440
<v Speaker 2>by whatever president is unlucky enough to be in office

170
00:09:04.440 --> 00:09:08.559
<v Speaker 2>at that time will do the cutting for Congress unless

171
00:09:08.600 --> 00:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>it is amending. So yeah, I think we're headed for

172
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:14.279
<v Speaker 2>either a crisis in the bond market or some sort

173
00:09:14.320 --> 00:09:18.279
<v Speaker 2>of catastrophic economic catastrophe you know that that is caused

174
00:09:18.279 --> 00:09:24.039
<v Speaker 2>by debts being unable to be repaid, or we're going

175
00:09:24.080 --> 00:09:26.879
<v Speaker 2>to see exactly what it is that those who don't

176
00:09:26.919 --> 00:09:31.399
<v Speaker 2>want to cut entitlements say is a crisis because it

177
00:09:31.440 --> 00:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>has to happen.

178
00:09:33.600 --> 00:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, now, another aspect of this fight that's been going

179
00:09:36.679 --> 00:09:39.799
<v Speaker 1>on is Trump saying, well, I know how we could,

180
00:09:39.919 --> 00:09:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, balance the budget or reduce the deficit, and

181
00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's to cut off the billions and billions of dollars

182
00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla subsidies. So, first of all, I don't think,

183
00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it amounts of billions and billions.

184
00:09:50.840 --> 00:09:51.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

185
00:09:51.159 --> 00:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't looked at the numbers for a long time.

186
00:09:53.679 --> 00:09:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Second of all, you know I'm thinking about the electric

187
00:09:56.840 --> 00:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>car market. Is if you go back to before the election,

188
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember distinctly Musk telling I think the Wall Street

189
00:10:04.159 --> 00:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Journal that got should be fine with me. If we

190
00:10:06.480 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>got rid of all the subsidies that Biden laid out,

191
00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it might actually be good for Tesla because, as you

192
00:10:11.759 --> 00:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>probably know, and many listeners may know, Tesla is actually

193
00:10:14.960 --> 00:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>able to produce their cars profitably with one caveat I'll

194
00:10:18.759 --> 00:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>come back to. While I think GM and Ford are

195
00:10:21.759 --> 00:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>still losing something like thirty or forty thousand dollars for

196
00:10:24.480 --> 00:10:28.399
<v Speaker 1>every single electric car they produce, which and they're not

197
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:29.799
<v Speaker 1>making it up on volume, as.

198
00:10:29.720 --> 00:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>The old joke goes, right, And.

199
00:10:33.919 --> 00:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think what I think Musk realizes that he

200
00:10:37.759 --> 00:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>has a competitive advantage, having been at this now for

201
00:10:40.360 --> 00:10:43.799
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen years of making the electric cars that

202
00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the other companies are not able to catch up with

203
00:10:46.519 --> 00:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and haven't been able to and it gets worse, and

204
00:10:49.159 --> 00:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the caveat. So we talk about the subsidies

205
00:10:52.559 --> 00:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which the Biden budget blowout tried to limit or to

206
00:10:57.000 --> 00:11:00.759
<v Speaker 1>middle income people and strip away from hir income people

207
00:11:00.759 --> 00:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>who were collecting most of the tax credits for electric

208
00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:07.519
<v Speaker 1>cars beforehand. But it turns out that Tesla makes a

209
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:12.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of money selling emission credits to the other automakers

210
00:11:12.840 --> 00:11:15.039
<v Speaker 1>who aren't able yet to meet some of the ambitious

211
00:11:15.039 --> 00:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>targets for lowering the emissions or the mileage requirements of

212
00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>their car fleets. So you know, that's actually a more

213
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>important subsidy in my mind, because I think that's a

214
00:11:24.399 --> 00:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>more reckless and dumb subsidy anyway that starts the market.

215
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:30.399
<v Speaker 1>So and I haven't seen any acknowledgment of that in

216
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the media coverage or the social media.

217
00:11:34.679 --> 00:11:36.039
<v Speaker 3>A fury about what's going on.

218
00:11:36.679 --> 00:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>No, and I think Trump is being really unfair here

219
00:11:39.559 --> 00:11:41.679
<v Speaker 2>to mask This is a line that has been picked

220
00:11:41.759 --> 00:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>up in Congress as well. He's just against this because

221
00:11:44.159 --> 00:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't want to lose his subsidies. He's been pretty

222
00:11:46.279 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>consistently opposed to those subsidies. The one thing that he

223
00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:53.879
<v Speaker 2>has said alongside opposing subsidies for evs is that he

224
00:11:53.919 --> 00:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want any subsidies for oil and gas either, so

225
00:11:57.399 --> 00:11:59.639
<v Speaker 2>he'd like a level playing field. But it's just not

226
00:11:59.679 --> 00:12:03.759
<v Speaker 2>the ca that he is angry with this bill because

227
00:12:03.879 --> 00:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it kills the subsidies. It should kill more subsidies. Steve,

228
00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:09.879
<v Speaker 2>I think Republicans are missing an opportunity. I have said,

229
00:12:10.559 --> 00:12:13.039
<v Speaker 2>and I always miss out the border funding. So that's

230
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:15.519
<v Speaker 2>my fault because I do support that. But the bill

231
00:12:15.559 --> 00:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I would like to have seen and will adding the

232
00:12:17.480 --> 00:12:21.399
<v Speaker 2>border funding as well, would have said. The twenty seventeen

233
00:12:21.480 --> 00:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is hereby renewed permanently. The

234
00:12:25.559 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two Inflation Reduction Act is hereby repealed in

235
00:12:30.120 --> 00:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>its entirety. There's no reason Republicans should be allowing any

236
00:12:34.360 --> 00:12:36.279
<v Speaker 2>of these subsidies to go through. And the left ha's

237
00:12:36.279 --> 00:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>got this idea that we simply can't compete with China

238
00:12:39.399 --> 00:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>technologically without the Inflation Reduction Act, which is a preposterous

239
00:12:43.159 --> 00:12:44.879
<v Speaker 2>thing to think, given that we were doing pretty well

240
00:12:44.879 --> 00:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>at competing technologically with China prior to twenty twenty two.

241
00:12:49.159 --> 00:12:53.039
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think that Musk is basing his opposition

242
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to this on eve subsidies or mandates or what you will.

243
00:12:57.519 --> 00:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he's genuinely worried about the name since fiscal situation.

244
00:13:01.440 --> 00:13:04.879
<v Speaker 2>But as with Doge, he is mischaracterizing a little bit

245
00:13:04.919 --> 00:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>what is causing that, and that's going to be a

246
00:13:08.720 --> 00:13:10.159
<v Speaker 2>problem for him in this fight.

247
00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

248
00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, now the subsidy question, the Biden people were dabblishly

249
00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:19.159
<v Speaker 1>clever in directing a lot of the money to rip states.

250
00:13:19.559 --> 00:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Yep. And so you know, you know what happens.

251
00:13:21.279 --> 00:13:23.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just like the whole ethanol game in Iowa all

252
00:13:23.639 --> 00:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>over again.

253
00:13:24.240 --> 00:13:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

254
00:13:24.519 --> 00:13:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Republican presidential candidates are always petrified against coming out for

255
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the ethanol mandates and subsidies because that's the first the

256
00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>nation primaries we all know, or caucus every four years,

257
00:13:36.519 --> 00:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and this has now expanded that idea. So you have

258
00:13:40.039 --> 00:13:42.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these red state senators in the Midwest

259
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>who love these subsidies for wind and solar power because

260
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, creating the phony government funded jobs there.

261
00:13:49.600 --> 00:13:51.759
<v Speaker 1>It does turn out I did a calculation on this

262
00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago now, but it turns out that

263
00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one mischievous proposal will put an end to a lot

264
00:13:56.360 --> 00:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of this, which is all right, let's have uniform subsidence

265
00:14:00.080 --> 00:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the East based on not the technology, but on the

266
00:14:05.320 --> 00:14:09.159
<v Speaker 1>energy output that you're able to produce. Because it turns

267
00:14:09.159 --> 00:14:11.879
<v Speaker 1>out that even if you say the oil and gas

268
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>industry get x millions of dollars in subsidies, they produce

269
00:14:16.279 --> 00:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of our energy, right, and so the subsidy

270
00:14:20.519 --> 00:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can argue about what qualifies as a subsidy,

271
00:14:23.279 --> 00:14:28.279
<v Speaker 1>but if you go by the subsidy for per BTU

272
00:14:28.639 --> 00:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or water or whatever energy measurement you wish to use,

273
00:14:31.799 --> 00:14:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you find out that the subsidy for oil and gas

274
00:14:34.039 --> 00:14:38.159
<v Speaker 1>is iiny, it's minuscule. And if you got rid of

275
00:14:38.159 --> 00:14:40.519
<v Speaker 1>all the subsidies, oil and gas wouldn't change their output

276
00:14:40.600 --> 00:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit, whereas if you reduce the subsidies or made

277
00:14:43.480 --> 00:14:46.759
<v Speaker 1>it linked to the energy output wind and solar in

278
00:14:46.759 --> 00:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>particular would have a really time. I do think the

279
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:51.679
<v Speaker 1>one wild card here, and sorry to ramble a bit,

280
00:14:51.840 --> 00:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is a nuclear power. I'm very frustrated with this whole subject,

281
00:14:56.679 --> 00:14:59.519
<v Speaker 1>and I don't understand why we have not been able

282
00:14:59.559 --> 00:15:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to figure out over all these years how to drive

283
00:15:02.679 --> 00:15:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the cost down. And so there the argument as well,

284
00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if we really want big baseload power, it might, by

285
00:15:09.960 --> 00:15:12.559
<v Speaker 1>the way, still survive. When are my theoretical proposal of

286
00:15:12.559 --> 00:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>having a uniform subsidy for a unit of energy produced,

287
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure.

288
00:15:17.240 --> 00:15:19.679
<v Speaker 3>I'd have to do some advanced math on all that.

289
00:15:20.039 --> 00:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's the other caveat about And apparently it's been

290
00:15:24.360 --> 00:15:26.799
<v Speaker 1>a big argument among Republicans in the House and the

291
00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Senate as to how to treat the nuclear subsidies in

292
00:15:30.480 --> 00:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the big beautiful bill.

293
00:15:31.639 --> 00:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nuclear is an odd one in the I almost

294
00:15:34.399 --> 00:15:37.519
<v Speaker 2>feel that we should subsidize nuclear just to offset all

295
00:15:37.559 --> 00:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of the crap that those who want to put nuclear

296
00:15:41.039 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>power into effect I had to deal with over the

297
00:15:43.039 --> 00:15:46.879
<v Speaker 2>last fifty years. You know, we had a small look,

298
00:15:46.919 --> 00:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not big on great national plans. You know, I

299
00:15:52.480 --> 00:15:56.039
<v Speaker 2>am romantic about the highway system because I love cause,

300
00:15:56.240 --> 00:15:59.519
<v Speaker 2>but I do take the conservative criticism of it, which

301
00:15:59.559 --> 00:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>was that it was ultimately a federal program. But I

302
00:16:02.559 --> 00:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>would be much more open to a grand national project

303
00:16:06.480 --> 00:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to nuclearize all of our power than to almost anything else,

304
00:16:10.600 --> 00:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>So I can see some sort of room for that.

305
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:23.519
<v Speaker 2>The system you just described, though, with subsidies, does make

306
00:16:23.559 --> 00:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the case for abolishing the minuscule oil and gas subsidies, right,

307
00:16:27.360 --> 00:16:31.559
<v Speaker 2>because if they wouldn't output any less energy as a

308
00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:36.399
<v Speaker 2>result of it going away, then why do we need it.

309
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just a small distortion in the market. But yeah,

310
00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:49.679
<v Speaker 2>I I think that the bill is a problem if

311
00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you are worried about our fiscal situation, and it's a

312
00:16:53.039 --> 00:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>problem if you want Republicans to do more. Where Trump also, Steve,

313
00:16:58.279 --> 00:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and I wonder what you think about this, where Trump

314
00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>also has the upper hand, is just as a matter

315
00:17:03.159 --> 00:17:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of elemental political gravity, it is the case that we

316
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>have what one two votes to spare in the House

317
00:17:12.039 --> 00:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>of Representatives, and that a lot of the people who

318
00:17:15.240 --> 00:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>are going to be expected to push this over the

319
00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:25.079
<v Speaker 2>line are squishes. Now yesterday, Elon Musk tweeted out, should

320
00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:32.279
<v Speaker 2>we create a new party, a third party for the

321
00:17:32.319 --> 00:17:35.279
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of people in the middle who don't feel

322
00:17:35.319 --> 00:17:37.559
<v Speaker 2>represented by the geopy or the Democrats. I think that

323
00:17:37.640 --> 00:17:40.039
<v Speaker 2>is an exaggeration. I don't think it is quite eighty percent,

324
00:17:40.079 --> 00:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>But of course there are a lot of independents who don't.

325
00:17:42.359 --> 00:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>What I think is unusual about this suggestion, though, and

326
00:17:44.799 --> 00:17:50.160
<v Speaker 2>does demonstrate a certain naivety on Mask's part. Is Number one,

327
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>we have what was a fairly decisive victory from Donald

328
00:17:53.160 --> 00:17:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump in twenty twenty four, and still he can't get

329
00:17:57.079 --> 00:18:00.759
<v Speaker 2>half of what Republicans would like to do. On why

330
00:18:00.759 --> 00:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>does Musk think that would get better if you created

331
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:06.799
<v Speaker 2>a party in the middle? And second, is he really

332
00:18:06.920 --> 00:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>under the impression that the middle of the political spectrum

333
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>in the United States is desperately in favor of cutting entitlements?

334
00:18:14.240 --> 00:18:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't think it is.

335
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it right? Well, this is one of those cases,

336
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and I've experienced this from Silicon Valley and tech people

337
00:18:22.119 --> 00:18:25.759
<v Speaker 1>for years now. Is they they tend to not understand

338
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>why social and political problems can't be solved exactly like

339
00:18:29.240 --> 00:18:32.599
<v Speaker 1>an engineering problem. And look, Musk is in some ways

340
00:18:32.680 --> 00:18:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the perfect median voter. Let's recall that fifteen years ago

341
00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:39.599
<v Speaker 1>he was all in for Obama and I don't remember

342
00:18:39.599 --> 00:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>if he was for Biden or not eight years ago

343
00:18:41.720 --> 00:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but or four years ago, and now he's

344
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then he flipped to Trump, and now he's slipped somewhere

345
00:18:47.880 --> 00:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. And I think that's just someone who

346
00:18:49.759 --> 00:18:53.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really understand politics. I think that's exactly right that

347
00:18:54.480 --> 00:18:56.519
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing about the angry middle is going to

348
00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:59.079
<v Speaker 1>rise up and organize for at least since Ross Parrot,

349
00:18:59.119 --> 00:19:01.759
<v Speaker 1>if not earlier. It never happens. It doesn't work that way.

350
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:06.839
<v Speaker 1>So well, let's get out on this, you know the way.

351
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:10.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're sort of known now that Trump's insults

352
00:19:10.119 --> 00:19:12.759
<v Speaker 1>often have an expiration date or can be turned around quickly.

353
00:19:13.880 --> 00:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's entirely possible that by the time this episode goes

354
00:19:17.759 --> 00:19:19.519
<v Speaker 1>live they will have kissed and made up.

355
00:19:21.319 --> 00:19:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Stranger things have happened.

356
00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:26.559
<v Speaker 1>The other one is is people think that there's people

357
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some conspiracy theorist saying this is all fake news.

358
00:19:29.480 --> 00:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's professional wrestling, which they both attend, and this is

359
00:19:33.000 --> 00:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to distract the Median Democrats from something. And in fact,

360
00:19:36.559 --> 00:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>some Democratic group did call for now for releasing the

361
00:19:39.119 --> 00:19:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Epstein list, which I think is pretty darn funny. Anyway,

362
00:19:43.079 --> 00:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>do you have any predictions on how this is going

363
00:19:44.920 --> 00:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to unfold? Is it just going to go away in

364
00:19:46.519 --> 00:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a few days or are they going to kiss and

365
00:19:47.960 --> 00:19:48.319
<v Speaker 1>make up?

366
00:19:48.359 --> 00:19:48.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

367
00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think one of those two things. I certainly

368
00:19:50.920 --> 00:19:53.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think that it's going to have catastrophic consequences for

369
00:19:53.720 --> 00:19:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the Republic. I've seen some people say this is it

370
00:19:55.759 --> 00:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>for the right, this is it for America. No, I

371
00:19:58.440 --> 00:20:00.759
<v Speaker 2>don't think so. I think we'll get about it in

372
00:20:00.839 --> 00:20:03.519
<v Speaker 2>six months. I don't think the space program is going

373
00:20:03.559 --> 00:20:06.759
<v Speaker 2>to be set back by it. Donald Trump is already

374
00:20:06.759 --> 00:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>sounding somewhat consideratorly, orbeit from a condescending position where he says, well,

375
00:20:10.759 --> 00:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that guy's crazy. I don't want to talk to him,

376
00:20:13.160 --> 00:20:15.079
<v Speaker 2>but I hope he gets the help he needs. And

377
00:20:15.079 --> 00:20:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the mask started to back off yesterday. I don't know

378
00:20:17.359 --> 00:20:20.599
<v Speaker 2>if you saw this. There was some user with seventeen

379
00:20:20.640 --> 00:20:24.240
<v Speaker 2>followers who said, you know, like a mother to the

380
00:20:24.279 --> 00:20:26.440
<v Speaker 2>two of them on Twitter, come now, this is silly.

381
00:20:26.440 --> 00:20:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't like this, we don't need this, and Musk respond,

382
00:20:29.000 --> 00:20:32.519
<v Speaker 2>all right, fine, I won't cancel the space program. So

383
00:20:32.720 --> 00:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>some guy on Twitter with seventeen followers may have saved

384
00:20:35.880 --> 00:20:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the future of the United States' presence in space. I

385
00:20:39.720 --> 00:20:42.839
<v Speaker 2>don't think that ultimately this is going to cause big

386
00:20:42.839 --> 00:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>problems for America. I suspect they'll either make up or

387
00:20:45.519 --> 00:20:49.119
<v Speaker 2>or just go away. But look, they are both very rich,

388
00:20:49.519 --> 00:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>successful men with egos. They don't agree on everything, and

389
00:20:54.640 --> 00:20:57.759
<v Speaker 2>this was inevitable as a result. So those of us,

390
00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:00.119
<v Speaker 2>which was everyone who said I can see what it's

391
00:21:00.160 --> 00:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>going to happen, shouldn't be shocked that has finally come

392
00:21:03.079 --> 00:21:03.559
<v Speaker 2>to fruition.

393
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:04.599
<v Speaker 3>Right.

394
00:21:04.720 --> 00:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think this kind of the intensity of this

395
00:21:07.759 --> 00:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that could only happen in a social media age.

396
00:21:10.240 --> 00:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, I don't know.

397
00:21:11.920 --> 00:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Agreed.

398
00:21:13.599 --> 00:21:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Well.

399
00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, while while we were all distracted by this great circus,

400
00:21:18.759 --> 00:21:20.559
<v Speaker 1>a couple of interesting things happened this week on the

401
00:21:20.599 --> 00:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>legal front, which I know is you're Baileywick first, another day,

402
00:21:25.279 --> 00:21:30.319
<v Speaker 1>another Trump decision, another federal district court judge blocking it.

403
00:21:30.359 --> 00:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>And it's twice this week, maybe or maybe more than that.

404
00:21:33.359 --> 00:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>At this point I yawned, it's you know, what else

405
00:21:35.240 --> 00:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is new? But unless you want to comment on that,

406
00:21:37.720 --> 00:21:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I was going to move on to something I think

407
00:21:39.359 --> 00:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>more interesting that is getting glossed over. And that was

408
00:21:42.960 --> 00:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court this week issuing two nine zero decisions

409
00:21:48.599 --> 00:21:53.039
<v Speaker 1>with the opinions written by the liberal justices, the two

410
00:21:53.079 --> 00:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>most recent Soda Mayor and Katanji Brown Jackson, that take

411
00:21:57.720 --> 00:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not exactly a conservative point of view, but reject implicitly

412
00:22:02.160 --> 00:22:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the progressive you about civil rights and religious liberty. Did

413
00:22:05.599 --> 00:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you follow those? Yes, raise your eyebrows as much as

414
00:22:07.920 --> 00:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I did at that result.

415
00:22:09.599 --> 00:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, which one are we talking about here?

416
00:22:12.200 --> 00:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Sorry?

417
00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I should explain for listeners who may not know this. Yes,

418
00:22:14.960 --> 00:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they're following the Musk Trump feud. The first case a

419
00:22:18.279 --> 00:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>nine zero case. I forget the name of it, but

420
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it was the case out of Ohio involving a woman

421
00:22:23.359 --> 00:22:27.559
<v Speaker 1>who had sued under Title seven aims the Aimes case.

422
00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:31.559
<v Speaker 1>She had sued alleging reverse discrimination, saying that she passed

423
00:22:31.599 --> 00:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>over for promotion and I think by a state agency,

424
00:22:34.160 --> 00:22:39.039
<v Speaker 1>by your supervisor, in favor of lesser qualified gay employees,

425
00:22:39.920 --> 00:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and lower courts had ruled no, sorry, because she's a

426
00:22:42.680 --> 00:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>member of a majority group, meaning she's a white woman,

427
00:22:46.200 --> 00:22:49.599
<v Speaker 1>left standing to sue for civil rights because the assumption

428
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>there is that civil rights laws are only meant to

429
00:22:51.759 --> 00:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>protect the officially protected classes of minorities, and was that

430
00:22:59.200 --> 00:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the one sodo My wrote the I don't remember which

431
00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>liberal woman justice wrote.

432
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Which James Jackson wrote that one. That's the Aims case.

433
00:23:08.319 --> 00:23:09.079
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

434
00:23:09.559 --> 00:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's very significant about that is for

435
00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at least forty years, I mean, I can remember the

436
00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>civil rights community back in the eighties when Reagan was

437
00:23:18.680 --> 00:23:22.039
<v Speaker 1>contesting some of this, saying, no, you don't understand. I

438
00:23:22.119 --> 00:23:24.799
<v Speaker 1>know the language of the Civil Rights Act as neutral

439
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:29.519
<v Speaker 1>and speaks of individuals, but really the intent was to

440
00:23:29.559 --> 00:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>apply it to minority groups have been oppressed, and so

441
00:23:31.960 --> 00:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually protect white people.

442
00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:35.799
<v Speaker 3>They were open about this.

443
00:23:36.039 --> 00:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember the woman back in the eighties

444
00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:42.559
<v Speaker 1>who made this argument quite brazenly and openly. And now

445
00:23:42.599 --> 00:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for the court to rule the three liberals on the

446
00:23:46.400 --> 00:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Court to go along with the older plain reading of

447
00:23:49.400 --> 00:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the text, I think it's quite significant. And I'm going

448
00:23:52.480 --> 00:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to be waiting to see people on the left react

449
00:23:56.440 --> 00:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with some degree of dismay about this.

450
00:23:59.279 --> 00:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was ably thrilled about this. I'm going to

451
00:24:01.920 --> 00:24:05.079
<v Speaker 2>take the opportunity which you offered in passing just to

452
00:24:05.200 --> 00:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>quickly comment on the judge trying to prevent the deportation

453
00:24:10.319 --> 00:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>of the Soliman family just because on this podcast. In

454
00:24:14.000 --> 00:24:16.319
<v Speaker 2>the past, I have been critical of some of the

455
00:24:16.480 --> 00:24:20.599
<v Speaker 2>legal positions that the Trump administration has taken on deportations.

456
00:24:20.599 --> 00:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Not the deportations themselves, which I thoroughly support, but I

457
00:24:24.039 --> 00:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>have thought that the strategy was ill conceived and likely

458
00:24:28.599 --> 00:24:32.599
<v Speaker 2>to provoke activist judges to jump in. This time, Trump

459
00:24:32.599 --> 00:24:35.279
<v Speaker 2>is one hundred percent right. This judge who has tried

460
00:24:35.319 --> 00:24:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to jump in here is crazy, has not offered a

461
00:24:37.920 --> 00:24:41.359
<v Speaker 2>single legal argument, and the briefs that are being filed

462
00:24:41.440 --> 00:24:43.359
<v Speaker 2>are just funny. There was one this morning I read

463
00:24:43.400 --> 00:24:48.319
<v Speaker 2>the habeas brief that didn't offer a single argument based

464
00:24:48.359 --> 00:24:51.359
<v Speaker 2>in statute or precedent, and just said that deporting the

465
00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:54.480
<v Speaker 2>family of this jihadis was a bit like Nazi Germany.

466
00:24:54.880 --> 00:24:57.559
<v Speaker 2>So Trump's right on this judge is wrong on the

467
00:24:57.599 --> 00:25:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Ames case. You know, it's interesting, Steve, that you say

468
00:25:03.240 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 2>that the prevailing progressive view of civil rights law is

469
00:25:09.759 --> 00:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that it doesn't apply to minorities majorities. Sorry, because that

470
00:25:15.079 --> 00:25:18.079
<v Speaker 2>is true, but it is also inexplicable if you've ever

471
00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:23.559
<v Speaker 2>gone back and read the text, If you read the

472
00:25:23.680 --> 00:25:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Fourteenth Amendment, if you read the congressional debates that led

473
00:25:28.720 --> 00:25:31.279
<v Speaker 2>to the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in Congress and

474
00:25:31.319 --> 00:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in the States, if you read the eighteen sixty six

475
00:25:34.480 --> 00:25:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Civil Rights Act which preceded it, and indeed the to

476
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Friedman's Bureaus Act as well, and then if you read

477
00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen sixty four Civil Rights Act and all of

478
00:25:42.880 --> 00:25:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the attendant discussion, you will see that it is quite

479
00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>clearly in text, in intent, in original public meaning, even

480
00:25:51.160 --> 00:25:53.400
<v Speaker 2>in legislative history, which we don't like, but is there.

481
00:25:54.240 --> 00:25:57.799
<v Speaker 2>It is a law that applies to individuals. The discrimination

482
00:25:57.920 --> 00:26:01.079
<v Speaker 2>attaches at the individual level. And what was so great

483
00:26:01.079 --> 00:26:05.559
<v Speaker 2>about the Supreme Court decision as written by Justice Jackson,

484
00:26:05.680 --> 00:26:08.359
<v Speaker 2>probably the most progressive member of the Court, is that

485
00:26:08.440 --> 00:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>she sounds like Justice Scalia when she is explaining the text.

486
00:26:14.119 --> 00:26:17.799
<v Speaker 2>She says this in no uncertain terms, over and over again,

487
00:26:18.319 --> 00:26:20.839
<v Speaker 2>that there is no such thing as a majority group

488
00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:24.559
<v Speaker 2>or a minority group, that there's no reverse or forward racism,

489
00:26:24.599 --> 00:26:27.079
<v Speaker 2>that there's no caveats in the law. If you are

490
00:26:27.119 --> 00:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>discriminated against based upon your sex, your race, your national origin,

491
00:26:35.240 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, you are able to lodge a complaint

492
00:26:39.839 --> 00:26:43.839
<v Speaker 2>under the Civil Rights Act, and this was a repudiation

493
00:26:44.200 --> 00:26:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of all of the nonsense that has built up for

494
00:26:46.640 --> 00:26:49.519
<v Speaker 2>forty years, both in the courts, but especially in academia

495
00:26:49.559 --> 00:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and in elite opinion, and has been unchecked. So for

496
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:56.640
<v Speaker 2>this to be nine and nothing is wonderful. It's also wonderful, incidentally,

497
00:26:56.640 --> 00:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>because each justice only gets a certain number of opinions

498
00:26:59.519 --> 00:27:01.519
<v Speaker 2>each term. When we got to use a justice Jackson

499
00:27:01.599 --> 00:27:03.240
<v Speaker 2>opinion on our outcome.

500
00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:05.799
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Yeah, that's right. Yeah.

501
00:27:05.799 --> 00:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So then the other case was out of Wisconsin and

502
00:27:10.160 --> 00:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>involved a state agency or I guess it's a state

503
00:27:13.079 --> 00:27:16.039
<v Speaker 1>tax official denying the tax exemption to a Catholic charity.

504
00:27:16.960 --> 00:27:18.200
<v Speaker 3>And their argument was, as well.

505
00:27:18.119 --> 00:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>As Catholic charity, these activities are really secular purposes or

506
00:27:21.519 --> 00:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not related to the religious mission. And the Wisconsin State

507
00:27:25.279 --> 00:27:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court agreed with that by a four to three split.

508
00:27:28.160 --> 00:27:30.279
<v Speaker 1>It turned out to be the four Democrats against the

509
00:27:30.279 --> 00:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>three Republicans. And essentially I haven't read the decision. I've

510
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>been traveling and goofing off, but again, a nine zero

511
00:27:38.720 --> 00:27:41.319
<v Speaker 1>decision was so to my orn the majority, and what

512
00:27:41.440 --> 00:27:43.599
<v Speaker 1>I gather from the brief news squibs I've read is

513
00:27:43.640 --> 00:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that essentially what the opinion says is no, the state

514
00:27:46.960 --> 00:27:49.839
<v Speaker 1>does not get to decide what is or isn't anchored

515
00:27:49.880 --> 00:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the religious mission of a bona fide religion like

516
00:27:53.240 --> 00:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic Church, which has been around a while together.

517
00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:57.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's another.

518
00:27:57.440 --> 00:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Blow for religious liberty and against the the definite undertone

519
00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of the secondar left for also for several decades now

520
00:28:04.839 --> 00:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>to try and marginalize and squeeze religion out of the

521
00:28:07.119 --> 00:28:07.839
<v Speaker 1>public square.

522
00:28:08.279 --> 00:28:10.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I haven't read this one either. I'll confess

523
00:28:10.559 --> 00:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I read AMS and I read the Mexico gun case,

524
00:28:13.880 --> 00:28:16.799
<v Speaker 2>but I haven't read this one. What I find so

525
00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:22.279
<v Speaker 2>encouraging about this case is that it is yet another

526
00:28:22.359 --> 00:28:29.559
<v Speaker 2>chipping away at this completely fake jurisprudence that has obtained

527
00:28:29.599 --> 00:28:34.799
<v Speaker 2>in America, starting with the war in court that invented

528
00:28:34.920 --> 00:28:37.680
<v Speaker 2>this so called wall of separation between church and state.

529
00:28:38.079 --> 00:28:40.799
<v Speaker 2>It is, of course the case that the United States

530
00:28:40.799 --> 00:28:43.839
<v Speaker 2>can't and shouldn't have an established religion, and there are

531
00:28:43.880 --> 00:28:47.039
<v Speaker 2>a few consequences of that that trickle down into other areas.

532
00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But generally speaking, most of the rules that have been

533
00:28:52.480 --> 00:28:59.759
<v Speaker 2>imposed since what nineteen sixty five, Yeah, nonsense, they're completely

534
00:29:00.119 --> 00:29:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you think they should be that. Maybe you think

535
00:29:02.240 --> 00:29:03.839
<v Speaker 2>that's they're a good thing, or if we were right

536
00:29:03.880 --> 00:29:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to a constitution from scratch, we would insert them. But

537
00:29:06.559 --> 00:29:09.799
<v Speaker 2>they are totally a historical, that's totally a textual. And

538
00:29:10.119 --> 00:29:12.799
<v Speaker 2>this was too. I'm just surprised that it was nine

539
00:29:12.799 --> 00:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to nothing. I'm shocked. Thoughts of my old wrote this one.

540
00:29:15.559 --> 00:29:18.039
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the courts moved to the right and

541
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:19.039
<v Speaker 2>that is a good thing.

542
00:29:20.079 --> 00:29:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can go back now or a decade or

543
00:29:22.559 --> 00:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>more when sus Kagan said we're all textual us now,

544
00:29:26.079 --> 00:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>which is for you know, of accommodation of originalism, and

545
00:29:29.200 --> 00:29:31.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that was actually quite significant, and it seems

546
00:29:31.599 --> 00:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like that view has taken hold in ways that I like.

547
00:29:35.480 --> 00:29:36.519
<v Speaker 3>I say, this has to be.

548
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Giving a heartburn to liberal jurisprudes and the all the

549
00:29:41.839 --> 00:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>law schools you mentioned.

550
00:29:43.440 --> 00:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I didn't put this on the list.

551
00:29:44.480 --> 00:29:47.119
<v Speaker 1>The Mexico gun case that was the Supreme Court saying no,

552
00:29:47.319 --> 00:29:48.079
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna hear a.

553
00:29:48.079 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Suit from Mexico about guns. Is that? But I got

554
00:29:50.240 --> 00:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that basically right.

555
00:29:51.839 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 2>How long have you got ob my area? But this

556
00:29:56.920 --> 00:30:03.240
<v Speaker 2>was maybe the crazy lawsuit I've read in a long time.

557
00:30:03.519 --> 00:30:06.079
<v Speaker 2>But I want to go back a few years. First,

558
00:30:06.119 --> 00:30:08.279
<v Speaker 2>just to introduce this because this is a hobby horse

559
00:30:08.319 --> 00:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of mine. In two thousand and five, while George W.

560
00:30:13.839 --> 00:30:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Bush was president, Congress passed a law that extended certain

561
00:30:19.319 --> 00:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>protections to gun manufacturers in order to stop a whole

562
00:30:23.440 --> 00:30:26.759
<v Speaker 2>host of lawsuits that had been brought to try to

563
00:30:26.799 --> 00:30:30.240
<v Speaker 2>create through the courts gun control that could not be

564
00:30:30.359 --> 00:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>achieved legislatively. Now this is pre hella, So there's no

565
00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:40.400
<v Speaker 2>prohibition on gun control at that point, in quite the

566
00:30:40.440 --> 00:30:43.039
<v Speaker 2>way there is now, although it should be said at

567
00:30:43.039 --> 00:30:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that point forty four states did have state level right

568
00:30:45.720 --> 00:30:49.839
<v Speaker 2>to keep them bear arms. But the left had got

569
00:30:49.880 --> 00:30:54.759
<v Speaker 2>into the bad habit which started really in earnest under

570
00:30:54.799 --> 00:31:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the Clinton administration and Andrew Cuomo as hud director of

571
00:31:00.799 --> 00:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>bringing court cases against gun manufacturers on the grounds that

572
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:09.799
<v Speaker 2>their products were dangerous to do what they couldn't do legislatively.

573
00:31:09.839 --> 00:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>So they would say this gun is very, very dangerous,

574
00:31:11.680 --> 00:31:13.799
<v Speaker 2>it can kill a lot of people, and therefore, commercially

575
00:31:13.839 --> 00:31:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it should not be available. And Congress said, no, that's

576
00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:21.559
<v Speaker 2>not how this should work. The liability does not attach

577
00:31:21.599 --> 00:31:23.559
<v Speaker 2>in that way. And it passed this law, and it

578
00:31:23.599 --> 00:31:26.759
<v Speaker 2>was a bipartisan law in both the House and the

579
00:31:26.799 --> 00:31:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Senate Bernie Sanders voted for it in two thousand and five.

580
00:31:30.400 --> 00:31:33.519
<v Speaker 2>The National Association of Manufacturers was very much in favor

581
00:31:33.559 --> 00:31:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of it, despite having no great interest in the gun

582
00:31:35.759 --> 00:31:39.279
<v Speaker 2>control debate, because it understood the threat that was being posed.

583
00:31:39.759 --> 00:31:43.039
<v Speaker 2>It did not, as Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden have

584
00:31:43.119 --> 00:31:48.079
<v Speaker 2>both lied about relentlessly, It did not make gun manufacturers

585
00:31:48.200 --> 00:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>immune in such cases as guns are badly manufactured or

586
00:31:51.680 --> 00:31:54.160
<v Speaker 2>go wrong. What it did was it said, if you

587
00:31:54.920 --> 00:31:57.960
<v Speaker 2>kill someone with a gun that works, you can't sue

588
00:31:58.000 --> 00:32:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Smith and Wesson. In the same way if I drive

589
00:32:01.079 --> 00:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>my car into you, you can't sue Forward if the

590
00:32:06.079 --> 00:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>breaks go wrong in my car. Of course I can

591
00:32:08.759 --> 00:32:12.720
<v Speaker 2>sue Ford if a gun goes off, which doesn't happen,

592
00:32:12.759 --> 00:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>by the way, But if it were to happen because

593
00:32:14.720 --> 00:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of a manufacturing defect and kill someone, of course you

594
00:32:17.880 --> 00:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>can sue Smith and Russon. But you're not allowed to

595
00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>use the law to get what you can't get. Politically,

596
00:32:24.200 --> 00:32:28.160
<v Speaker 2>that law has been on the books now for twenty years,

597
00:32:28.200 --> 00:32:30.799
<v Speaker 2>despite the Democrats' obsession with getting rid of it. If

598
00:32:30.839 --> 00:32:35.039
<v Speaker 2>you look back at the twenty sixteen and twenty twenty elections,

599
00:32:35.119 --> 00:32:40.279
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic candidates went on and on and on about this. Well, Mexico,

600
00:32:40.480 --> 00:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the country of Mexico, the sovereign state of Mexico, a

601
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago, decided that it might try to

602
00:32:47.720 --> 00:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>affect gun control in the United States as well, and

603
00:32:51.720 --> 00:32:54.599
<v Speaker 2>so it brought this case that argued, in effect, that

604
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:58.799
<v Speaker 2>American gun manufacturers knew that the guns that they were

605
00:32:58.839 --> 00:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>making and marketing would make their way into the hands

606
00:33:02.400 --> 00:33:05.039
<v Speaker 2>of the cartels, that they wanted that to be the case.

607
00:33:05.119 --> 00:33:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Not just that they were negligent in the usual way

608
00:33:08.039 --> 00:33:11.559
<v Speaker 2>of not caring about whether they did, but they actually

609
00:33:11.720 --> 00:33:16.839
<v Speaker 2>wanted the American gun cash to go down south, and

610
00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:20.359
<v Speaker 2>they tried to impose all manner of restrictions on what

611
00:33:20.480 --> 00:33:23.599
<v Speaker 2>guns you can and can't buy through this lawsuit. And

612
00:33:23.799 --> 00:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>this went to the Supreme Court. It was considered under

613
00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>this two thousand and five law and uniformly nine to

614
00:33:30.960 --> 00:33:34.279
<v Speaker 2>nothing in a decision written by Justice Kagan, of all people,

615
00:33:34.799 --> 00:33:37.559
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court said, you just can't do that. That

616
00:33:37.680 --> 00:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what this law was designed to stop. I

617
00:33:42.559 --> 00:33:45.079
<v Speaker 2>find it amazing that anyone ever took this seriously, Steve,

618
00:33:45.160 --> 00:33:47.799
<v Speaker 2>and they did. The gun control groups were all over this.

619
00:33:48.000 --> 00:33:51.279
<v Speaker 2>They pretended that this was a meritorious suit, and so

620
00:33:51.319 --> 00:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>on and so forth. It was, quite honestly the stupidest,

621
00:33:54.720 --> 00:33:58.039
<v Speaker 2>most cynical pretextual laws I've ever read. And I think

622
00:33:58.079 --> 00:33:59.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a good thing for America that this was.

623
00:33:59.759 --> 00:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Well, I've got one that may equal it

624
00:34:03.079 --> 00:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>or exceed it that I'll come to. Well, I'll just

625
00:34:04.680 --> 00:34:07.759
<v Speaker 1>say that I think we file these three cases as

626
00:34:07.839 --> 00:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>legitimate entries in the so much winning file.

627
00:34:10.679 --> 00:34:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally.

628
00:34:13.320 --> 00:34:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Here's the corollary case just out in the last ten

629
00:34:16.119 --> 00:34:18.559
<v Speaker 1>days or so. It's a state case out of Washington State.

630
00:34:19.519 --> 00:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>The climate crazy people have brought a wrongful death lawsuit

631
00:34:24.159 --> 00:34:27.039
<v Speaker 1>against the fossil fuel man you know, oil companies essentially.

632
00:34:27.840 --> 00:34:33.559
<v Speaker 1>And the circumstances were a woman essentially died of heatstroke

633
00:34:33.679 --> 00:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in her car on a hot summer day. Now what's

634
00:34:37.480 --> 00:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>left out of the story is why is she in

635
00:34:39.559 --> 00:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>her car on a hot summer day with the windows up.

636
00:34:42.400 --> 00:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>There's something they're not telling us here. Was she passed

637
00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>out from fentanyl? What she drunk? Was she homeless? We

638
00:34:48.519 --> 00:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know that, but my suspicions are on.

639
00:34:50.800 --> 00:34:51.480
<v Speaker 3>High alert here.

640
00:34:51.960 --> 00:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But even even if it was just someone who fell

641
00:34:54.440 --> 00:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>asleep because I was just tired of something like that,

642
00:34:57.079 --> 00:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And none of those factors come into play. The idea

643
00:35:00.159 --> 00:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can now attribute the hot day to the

644
00:35:03.360 --> 00:35:06.519
<v Speaker 1>oil companies who sold their and a woman who apparently

645
00:35:06.639 --> 00:35:09.559
<v Speaker 1>bought their product for her car, Well, that suit has

646
00:35:09.599 --> 00:35:12.679
<v Speaker 1>been filed, and I think what both these suits say.

647
00:35:12.719 --> 00:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You know the guncases, which you know I've been aware of,

648
00:35:15.800 --> 00:35:18.119
<v Speaker 1>but these climate suits have been following for a while that.

649
00:35:18.440 --> 00:35:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Want to hold the oil companies liable for global.

650
00:35:20.639 --> 00:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Warming, even though the big oil companies in the US

651
00:35:24.000 --> 00:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and Europe account for such a tiny amount of emissions

652
00:35:26.880 --> 00:35:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on the global scale going back decades. As if you

653
00:35:29.320 --> 00:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>actually do the math on this, it shows you that

654
00:35:31.840 --> 00:35:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the impulse on the left to try and use the

655
00:35:33.760 --> 00:35:36.639
<v Speaker 1>judiciary is the primary mode to get what they want

656
00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>still runs very strong. But boy, it's sure hitting a

657
00:35:39.400 --> 00:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>wall right now. I think that's absolutely right.

658
00:35:41.960 --> 00:35:44.800
<v Speaker 2>For a very long time the left has done that,

659
00:35:44.960 --> 00:35:48.159
<v Speaker 2>and look, sometimes it's been legitimate. You do need to

660
00:35:48.159 --> 00:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>be able to take cases to court that are unpopular

661
00:35:51.280 --> 00:35:55.639
<v Speaker 2>in vindicating your rights if those rights exist. Unfortunately, the

662
00:35:55.760 --> 00:35:59.280
<v Speaker 2>left has recognized for decades that if it gets the

663
00:35:59.320 --> 00:36:01.159
<v Speaker 2>right people on the court, it can go to the

664
00:36:01.199 --> 00:36:03.719
<v Speaker 2>court and ask the court to make up rights that

665
00:36:03.880 --> 00:36:08.519
<v Speaker 2>don't exist, abortion, gay marriage, and so on. And that

666
00:36:08.639 --> 00:36:10.719
<v Speaker 2>era does seem, at least for now, to be coming

667
00:36:10.719 --> 00:36:12.119
<v Speaker 2>to an end at the Supreme Court.

668
00:36:12.119 --> 00:36:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree, yes, I think so, yeah, yeah, And

669
00:36:15.559 --> 00:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things to be unwound or modified. So

670
00:36:18.320 --> 00:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of work ahead of them, not

671
00:36:20.840 --> 00:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention all these crazy district court injunctions. At the Court,

672
00:36:25.360 --> 00:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what they do here. We're now down to

673
00:36:27.320 --> 00:36:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks. The big case we're all waiting

674
00:36:30.119 --> 00:36:33.679
<v Speaker 1>for is Scurmetti. That's the one about Tennessee's law restricting

675
00:36:34.119 --> 00:36:38.199
<v Speaker 1>your transgender surgeries on children and so forth. So we'll

676
00:36:38.239 --> 00:36:41.679
<v Speaker 1>see how that all goes. I don't have anything else

677
00:36:41.719 --> 00:36:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in legal news, is there. I know that you know

678
00:36:43.679 --> 00:36:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you're running law talk these days, and it's something you

679
00:36:45.840 --> 00:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like to follow. There's something else of your mind, A.

680
00:36:48.840 --> 00:36:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Question for you, but it's not a law talk sort

681
00:36:51.199 --> 00:36:55.119
<v Speaker 2>of question. Sure, how much on a scale of one

682
00:36:55.159 --> 00:36:57.599
<v Speaker 2>to ten, are you looking forward to reading care and

683
00:36:57.679 --> 00:37:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Genepa's new book Independent.

684
00:37:01.119 --> 00:37:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was going to bring that up. I had

685
00:37:02.800 --> 00:37:03.559
<v Speaker 3>it on my list.

686
00:37:04.159 --> 00:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we didn't see this coming, right, I mean

687
00:37:06.440 --> 00:37:10.679
<v Speaker 1>there's all these books about Biden right at original sin

688
00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and all.

689
00:37:11.000 --> 00:37:11.559
<v Speaker 3>The rest of that.

690
00:37:11.719 --> 00:37:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And so now the Democratic firing squad, a circular firing squad,

691
00:37:15.320 --> 00:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is reforming with Kareem John Pierre in the middle saying

692
00:37:19.360 --> 00:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm an independent. Now, by the way, maybe she can

693
00:37:21.320 --> 00:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>go to work for Elon Musk on that independent party

694
00:37:23.519 --> 00:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he wants to put together. Right, And I mean, boy,

695
00:37:27.480 --> 00:37:29.519
<v Speaker 1>this has only been in the last forty eight seventy

696
00:37:29.519 --> 00:37:33.320
<v Speaker 1>two hours about the story. And I mean, just as

697
00:37:33.400 --> 00:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden's sinility was obvious to anyone, her incapacity in the

698
00:37:37.920 --> 00:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>job as press spokesman was obvious to everyone. That she's

699
00:37:41.519 --> 00:37:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a complete mediocrity was an identity politics higher full stop.

700
00:37:45.679 --> 00:37:47.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this was obvious to everybody.

701
00:37:47.239 --> 00:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And now you're seeing you know, anonymous sources and axios

702
00:37:51.239 --> 00:37:52.519
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere saying.

703
00:37:52.280 --> 00:37:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh, she was terrible at her job.

704
00:37:54.199 --> 00:37:57.039
<v Speaker 1>So the knives are out for and here I just

705
00:37:57.119 --> 00:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have to get even fatter than I'm already am on

706
00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:02.199
<v Speaker 1>another sixty four gallon drummer popcorn.

707
00:38:02.679 --> 00:38:05.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think Mark Hemingway pointed out that this

708
00:38:05.599 --> 00:38:10.119
<v Speaker 2>is the definitive proof of the Left using the immutable

709
00:38:10.199 --> 00:38:14.239
<v Speaker 2>characteristics of people to deflect criticism because some of the

710
00:38:14.280 --> 00:38:16.960
<v Speaker 2>same people who are now saying, right, she was an idiot,

711
00:38:17.320 --> 00:38:21.199
<v Speaker 2>we never liked her, were telling conservatives who criticized her, oh,

712
00:38:21.239 --> 00:38:24.360
<v Speaker 2>you only say that because and we would say, no,

713
00:38:24.440 --> 00:38:26.559
<v Speaker 2>we're not saying that because she's a lesbian, saying that

714
00:38:26.599 --> 00:38:28.079
<v Speaker 2>because she's black. We're saying that because she's just not

715
00:38:28.119 --> 00:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>good at her job. She has to open a binder

716
00:38:30.000 --> 00:38:32.960
<v Speaker 2>every time she's asked her name. And they would say, no, no,

717
00:38:33.039 --> 00:38:36.159
<v Speaker 2>you just hate powerful women. Well, now the same people

718
00:38:36.239 --> 00:38:39.199
<v Speaker 2>are acknowledging that she was a liability to the White House,

719
00:38:39.239 --> 00:38:41.599
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't like her, and that she'd been hired

720
00:38:41.639 --> 00:38:45.760
<v Speaker 2>purely for the the nature of her being, and that

721
00:38:45.920 --> 00:38:48.519
<v Speaker 2>is absurd, I think. But I just think that this

722
00:38:48.679 --> 00:38:56.320
<v Speaker 2>is the most cynical and astonishing shift that I have

723
00:38:56.400 --> 00:38:58.679
<v Speaker 2>ever seen, Steve. I mean, this would be like me

724
00:38:58.840 --> 00:39:02.199
<v Speaker 2>coming out tomorrow and saying my new book is called

725
00:39:02.639 --> 00:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>why All Guns Should be Banned? And in not accounting

726
00:39:05.519 --> 00:39:07.559
<v Speaker 2>for the shift, people would say, hang on a minute,

727
00:39:07.559 --> 00:39:10.119
<v Speaker 2>we were watching you day in, day out make the

728
00:39:10.159 --> 00:39:13.639
<v Speaker 2>case for the Second Amendment. When did you what she

729
00:39:13.920 --> 00:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>stood on that podium and this is her job, This

730
00:39:18.000 --> 00:39:19.880
<v Speaker 2>isn't a criticism. You have to do this if your

731
00:39:19.880 --> 00:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>White House Press secretary. But she stood on that podium

732
00:39:23.039 --> 00:39:26.239
<v Speaker 2>day and day out, and she made the case for

733
00:39:26.320 --> 00:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Biden and the White House. She said what she was

734
00:39:29.039 --> 00:39:33.079
<v Speaker 2>told to say. She defended the party line. So every

735
00:39:33.159 --> 00:39:34.960
<v Speaker 2>day her line is Biden is right, Biden is right,

736
00:39:34.960 --> 00:39:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Biden is right, Biden is right. And then the first

737
00:39:37.559 --> 00:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>thing we hear from her the moment she leaves that

738
00:39:39.920 --> 00:39:41.960
<v Speaker 2>job is actually, I'm kind of an independent.

739
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Are are you kidding?

740
00:39:44.119 --> 00:39:45.559
<v Speaker 2>How cynical could you get?

741
00:39:45.800 --> 00:39:46.039
<v Speaker 3>Well?

742
00:39:46.280 --> 00:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean well, just as it was appalling that the

743
00:39:48.440 --> 00:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>media would avert their gaze from Biden's obvious incapacity, I

744
00:39:52.920 --> 00:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe that self respecting, seemingly self respecting reporters would

745
00:39:57.360 --> 00:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sit there every day and swallow and not beat back.

746
00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I can hurt up appallingly mediocre and often ridiculous and

747
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>visible answers. I mean it was I thought, this has

748
00:40:06.559 --> 00:40:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a rejected Aaron Sorkin script, doesn't it.

749
00:40:10.079 --> 00:40:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, they would end up asking these Obama style

750
00:40:13.559 --> 00:40:18.480
<v Speaker 2>questions of per So they would say things like does

751
00:40:18.800 --> 00:40:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the President find it hurtful when Republicans say? Or what

752
00:40:25.119 --> 00:40:28.199
<v Speaker 2>did the President like the most about his recent trip

753
00:40:28.239 --> 00:40:32.039
<v Speaker 2>to Italy. That's how they got around it. They didn't say, hey,

754
00:40:32.159 --> 00:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>you who's supposed to tell us the truth? What about this?

755
00:40:34.960 --> 00:40:37.760
<v Speaker 2>They would say, what do you find most enchanting about

756
00:40:37.800 --> 00:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>working in the White House?

757
00:40:39.400 --> 00:40:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it reminds me a little bit. And

758
00:40:42.079 --> 00:40:45.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is an apt parallel, but back in the

759
00:40:45.119 --> 00:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>battle days of arms control talks with the Soviet Union

760
00:40:48.039 --> 00:40:51.519
<v Speaker 1>or any summits for that matter, the Soviet negotiators will

761
00:40:51.559 --> 00:40:55.039
<v Speaker 1>always come in with big thick notebooks, and our team

762
00:40:55.360 --> 00:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes our president if it was face to face

763
00:40:57.320 --> 00:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with Brezhnev or somebody would say X, and the Russian

764
00:41:02.440 --> 00:41:05.079
<v Speaker 1>translation would go through, and then that all the Russians

765
00:41:05.079 --> 00:41:08.039
<v Speaker 1>would be pouring through their notebooks to find a prescripted

766
00:41:08.039 --> 00:41:12.079
<v Speaker 1>answer to a question they had anticipated. So that's why

767
00:41:12.599 --> 00:41:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those negotiations, aside from the substance of them,

768
00:41:15.639 --> 00:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>took forever to get anywhere, because then so it became

769
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:21.559
<v Speaker 1>a game for our side to try and think of

770
00:41:21.599 --> 00:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a way of putting a question that they wouldn't have

771
00:41:23.400 --> 00:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>had a pre cooked answer for, and then then they

772
00:41:25.960 --> 00:41:28.159
<v Speaker 1>would on take a break, is what the Soviets would do.

773
00:41:28.239 --> 00:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So I kept thinking back to that when I'd watch

774
00:41:30.480 --> 00:41:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a kreem John Pierre pour through a notebook and oftentimes

775
00:41:33.719 --> 00:41:37.639
<v Speaker 1>give an answer that was often not even tenuously related

776
00:41:37.639 --> 00:41:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to the question, and it was just embarrassing to watch it.

777
00:41:40.079 --> 00:41:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't believe the media put up with it.

778
00:41:41.880 --> 00:41:43.719
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know if you've ever come across this

779
00:41:43.840 --> 00:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>story as a historian, but I heard it related on

780
00:41:47.320 --> 00:41:51.199
<v Speaker 2>the old Cold War series that Ted Turner commissioned for

781
00:41:51.280 --> 00:41:55.800
<v Speaker 2>CNN that is narrated by Kenneth Branna. Yeah, that during

782
00:41:55.880 --> 00:42:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the I guess early seventies, Nixon went to a meeting

783
00:42:01.079 --> 00:42:04.639
<v Speaker 2>with the Chinese and he wanted something from them. I

784
00:42:04.639 --> 00:42:06.840
<v Speaker 2>forget what it was. It could have been arms control,

785
00:42:07.000 --> 00:42:13.719
<v Speaker 2>but anyhow, the meeting involves a dinner. Everyone's getting along. Famously.

786
00:42:13.760 --> 00:42:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Bill Buckley hated this. He would go on

787
00:42:17.400 --> 00:42:20.159
<v Speaker 2>a tear whenever he saw this. But Nixon is being

788
00:42:20.199 --> 00:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>diplomatic and a great statesman, and then the Chinese premiere

789
00:42:30.320 --> 00:42:33.440
<v Speaker 2>just starts tearing into the United States for forty five

790
00:42:33.519 --> 00:42:38.239
<v Speaker 2>minutes and describing their crimes as he puts it in Vietnam,

791
00:42:38.920 --> 00:42:43.039
<v Speaker 2>and Nixon just sat there and he sensed that this

792
00:42:43.199 --> 00:42:45.280
<v Speaker 2>was for internal consumption, that they were going to release

793
00:42:45.320 --> 00:42:47.280
<v Speaker 2>it in all the newspapers, and so he just sat

794
00:42:47.320 --> 00:42:49.000
<v Speaker 2>there and then when it was over, everyone sort of

795
00:42:49.000 --> 00:42:50.840
<v Speaker 2>looked at each other and he raised a toast and

796
00:42:50.880 --> 00:42:54.320
<v Speaker 2>they just carried on. You know, I watched this story

797
00:42:54.360 --> 00:42:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, well, I understand that's probably what you

798
00:42:56.320 --> 00:42:59.639
<v Speaker 2>have to do sometimes in these situations, but I don't

799
00:42:59.679 --> 00:43:02.719
<v Speaker 2>think Trump would do that. I just don't think Trump

800
00:43:02.719 --> 00:43:07.280
<v Speaker 2>would be berated to his face by the Chinese premier.

801
00:43:07.360 --> 00:43:10.199
<v Speaker 3>Do you no, Nope, that's for dark Sure.

802
00:43:13.039 --> 00:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I think we ought to move up to

803
00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things of foreign affairs, because I also

804
00:43:17.960 --> 00:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Ukrainian attack on the Russian bombers in the

805
00:43:22.400 --> 00:43:25.039
<v Speaker 1>week is really stupendous. I mean, people are saying it's

806
00:43:25.039 --> 00:43:27.079
<v Speaker 1>on the level of what the Israelis have done over

807
00:43:27.119 --> 00:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the years, and one wonders how much they how many

808
00:43:32.000 --> 00:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>other things they might have up their sleeve, because although

809
00:43:34.800 --> 00:43:37.079
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a thrilling thing for supporters of Ukraine,

810
00:43:37.119 --> 00:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and I do still think that the underlying correlation of

811
00:43:41.039 --> 00:43:44.639
<v Speaker 1>forces and the ambivalence, if you can put it that way,

812
00:43:44.679 --> 00:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration still makes me rather pessimistic about

813
00:43:47.480 --> 00:43:49.599
<v Speaker 1>the scene. How do you size it up right now.

814
00:43:50.440 --> 00:43:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's still of war of attrition, and

815
00:43:54.000 --> 00:43:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that does seem to be hurting Russia slightly more, but

816
00:43:57.559 --> 00:44:02.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. Peutin Kaz the drone attack was incredible.

817
00:44:03.119 --> 00:44:06.639
<v Speaker 2>It had the effects of both thrilling me as somebody

818
00:44:06.679 --> 00:44:10.519
<v Speaker 2>who wants to see Ukraine win, but also as a

819
00:44:10.599 --> 00:44:13.679
<v Speaker 2>human being, terrifying me because I could see those drones

820
00:44:13.719 --> 00:44:15.800
<v Speaker 2>coming over the American border and I wondered if we

821
00:44:15.880 --> 00:44:19.719
<v Speaker 2>had the capacity to repel them. If this is how

822
00:44:19.840 --> 00:44:23.039
<v Speaker 2>wars will be fought, we have some catching up to door,

823
00:44:23.079 --> 00:44:25.880
<v Speaker 2>or at least I do in my understanding of warfare.

824
00:44:25.920 --> 00:44:28.079
<v Speaker 2>The analogy I drew on the Editor's podcast when we

825
00:44:28.119 --> 00:44:34.000
<v Speaker 2>talked about this was if you go to a meeting, sorry,

826
00:44:34.039 --> 00:44:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a museum of World War One, the exhibits tend not

827
00:44:39.559 --> 00:44:44.519
<v Speaker 2>to start in nineteen fourteen, but in the American Civil War,

828
00:44:45.360 --> 00:44:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and then they run through the Franco Prussian War and

829
00:44:48.039 --> 00:44:51.199
<v Speaker 2>possibly the Russo Japanese War of nineteen oh five. The

830
00:44:51.280 --> 00:44:56.639
<v Speaker 2>point being that the technologies that eventually came to dominate

831
00:44:57.159 --> 00:44:59.880
<v Speaker 2>World War One and make it such a meet go

832
00:45:01.159 --> 00:45:05.599
<v Speaker 2>had been evident if you'd been looking carefully since the

833
00:45:05.639 --> 00:45:09.599
<v Speaker 2>American Civil War, and I just wondered, if this is

834
00:45:09.599 --> 00:45:13.559
<v Speaker 2>what we're now going to see in the future, that

835
00:45:13.639 --> 00:45:15.400
<v Speaker 2>in fifty years time we'll be saying, well, of course

836
00:45:15.400 --> 00:45:19.719
<v Speaker 2>where this started was Russia Ukraine in twenty twenty two

837
00:45:20.159 --> 00:45:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to whenever it ended. It worried me a little bit,

838
00:45:24.079 --> 00:45:27.360
<v Speaker 2>just because it seems so difficult to stop. But its

839
00:45:27.400 --> 00:45:32.000
<v Speaker 2>application was incredible. I mean, to do that much damage

840
00:45:32.039 --> 00:45:34.199
<v Speaker 2>to the Russian air force was it one third of

841
00:45:34.239 --> 00:45:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the planes taken out? But I don't know if it

842
00:45:37.440 --> 00:45:40.079
<v Speaker 2>changes the fundamental problem on the ground, which is that

843
00:45:40.119 --> 00:45:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you have two dug in armies, you have a defensive advantage,

844
00:45:44.719 --> 00:45:48.559
<v Speaker 2>and you have prerogatives on both sides that make it

845
00:45:48.599 --> 00:45:52.239
<v Speaker 2>difficult to stop. The Russians want to take Ukraine and

846
00:45:52.360 --> 00:45:55.679
<v Speaker 2>they're led by a madman, and the Ukrainians quite rightly

847
00:45:55.679 --> 00:45:58.159
<v Speaker 2>don't want to give up Ukraine. So did that really

848
00:45:58.239 --> 00:45:58.840
<v Speaker 2>change much?

849
00:45:59.280 --> 00:46:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some of the same worries that you do.

850
00:46:01.920 --> 00:46:05.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, years ago, I might have been more confident

851
00:46:05.159 --> 00:46:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that our defense establishment was more forward looking and anticipating

852
00:46:08.719 --> 00:46:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and developing countermeasures that we didn't know about. There are

853
00:46:11.679 --> 00:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of examples of that in the past. But I

854
00:46:13.599 --> 00:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of worry that our defense establishment may have gotten

855
00:46:17.320 --> 00:46:20.800
<v Speaker 1>sluggish in recent years. I'm reminded a bit that you

856
00:46:20.840 --> 00:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mention some of those precursors to World War One. I

857
00:46:23.800 --> 00:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>do know the story of Churchill, I think before he

858
00:46:26.920 --> 00:46:30.079
<v Speaker 1>was First Lord of the Admiralty, maybe way before that,

859
00:46:30.400 --> 00:46:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but sometime, you know, the submarine was being developed and expanded,

860
00:46:34.440 --> 00:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and the British Navy, as I recall the story, rightly,

861
00:46:38.079 --> 00:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>said well submarine, Yeah, we've looked at him, and they

862
00:46:40.480 --> 00:46:44.599
<v Speaker 1>might be useful for coastal defense. And Churchill said no, no, no,

863
00:46:44.639 --> 00:46:47.079
<v Speaker 1>you don't understand. As these things get better and scaled up,

864
00:46:47.079 --> 00:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be used for interdiction of shipping out

865
00:46:50.480 --> 00:46:53.079
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, which is exactly

866
00:46:53.079 --> 00:46:55.559
<v Speaker 1>how Germany started using it, as we saw in World

867
00:46:55.559 --> 00:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>War One and especially World War Two. So you know,

868
00:46:57.960 --> 00:47:01.599
<v Speaker 1>it takes some imagination and some buddy to push the subject.

869
00:47:02.079 --> 00:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>There's more can be said about Churchill and technology like

870
00:47:04.400 --> 00:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the tank and so forth.

871
00:47:06.119 --> 00:47:06.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm I don't know.

872
00:47:07.199 --> 00:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about this, and a lot of the research

873
00:47:10.760 --> 00:47:13.199
<v Speaker 1>would be classified, of course, so we won't hear about it.

874
00:47:14.000 --> 00:47:16.159
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, but it is something to worry about.

875
00:47:16.519 --> 00:47:19.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, Churchill said a few days after the war

876
00:47:19.159 --> 00:47:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in Europe ended, one of his friends or colleagues asked

877
00:47:24.039 --> 00:47:30.000
<v Speaker 2>him if he'd been worried, and he said, no other

878
00:47:30.079 --> 00:47:34.840
<v Speaker 2>than the German submarine War. Now that wasn't quite true.

879
00:47:34.960 --> 00:47:37.119
<v Speaker 2>He was worried. He at one point thought he was

880
00:47:37.119 --> 00:47:38.559
<v Speaker 2>going to have to fight his way out of Downing

881
00:47:38.559 --> 00:47:40.639
<v Speaker 2>Street with a revolver and would die on the floor

882
00:47:40.719 --> 00:47:41.679
<v Speaker 2>choking on his own blood.

883
00:47:41.679 --> 00:47:42.639
<v Speaker 3>But he.

884
00:47:44.320 --> 00:47:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Seems to have been most worried about exactly what you

885
00:47:46.639 --> 00:47:50.119
<v Speaker 2>described because he saw it so early. He understood the threat.

886
00:47:50.239 --> 00:47:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, you know one of it.

887
00:47:51.159 --> 00:47:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll keep going on this because I'm you know,

888
00:47:52.639 --> 00:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge Churchill fan. It was one of his

889
00:47:55.400 --> 00:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>first speeches as a member of the House of Commons.

890
00:47:57.719 --> 00:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to say nineteen hundred and nineteen oh one.

891
00:48:00.639 --> 00:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And remember he'd seen some of the some of the

892
00:48:03.280 --> 00:48:05.599
<v Speaker 1>things that you described a moment ago in his own

893
00:48:05.639 --> 00:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>experience in the Boer War and in the River War

894
00:48:08.039 --> 00:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in Sudan, you know, the mass killing of autumn mechanized warfare,

895
00:48:12.519 --> 00:48:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and wrote very movingly about it in his lesser known

896
00:48:14.800 --> 00:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>books like The River War, and one of the speeches

897
00:48:18.519 --> 00:48:21.679
<v Speaker 1>he said paraphrasing here, So you know, there's all us

898
00:48:21.679 --> 00:48:25.800
<v Speaker 1>optimism that were now people like Theodore Roosevelt was saying

899
00:48:25.840 --> 00:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that war is a thing of the past. The twentieth

900
00:48:28.280 --> 00:48:32.039
<v Speaker 1>century be a century of moral progress and material progress,

901
00:48:32.119 --> 00:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and utter leading thinkers said, no, there won't ever be

902
00:48:34.519 --> 00:48:37.519
<v Speaker 1>another big European war. And Churchill, and one of his

903
00:48:37.599 --> 00:48:40.039
<v Speaker 1>memorable phrases said, the wars of peoples are going to

904
00:48:40.079 --> 00:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be worse than the wars of kings, and they will

905
00:48:42.360 --> 00:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>involve entire populations. Is very prescient, right, He was having

906
00:48:45.960 --> 00:48:48.360
<v Speaker 1>none of this facile optimism.

907
00:48:48.599 --> 00:48:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then you just look at the casualty figures,

908
00:48:50.800 --> 00:48:54.239
<v Speaker 2>and especially World War two, more people died in the

909
00:48:54.239 --> 00:49:00.000
<v Speaker 2>civilian population in the world than in ominously right.

910
00:49:00.079 --> 00:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, last topic, perhaps the Tenan House biography of Bill

911
00:49:04.960 --> 00:49:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Buckley is out this week.

912
00:49:06.199 --> 00:49:08.559
<v Speaker 3>I have read it and have a long review forthcoming.

913
00:49:09.039 --> 00:49:09.599
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if.

914
00:49:09.559 --> 00:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You've had a chance to read it yet. I know

915
00:49:11.400 --> 00:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been a subject of course at the National Review Circle,

916
00:49:14.400 --> 00:49:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and there have been I will say, some what do

917
00:49:18.360 --> 00:49:22.559
<v Speaker 1>you say, disparate reviews on the site. You know Neil Freeman,

918
00:49:22.639 --> 00:49:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who was close to Buckley forever and was very skeptical

919
00:49:26.320 --> 00:49:29.039
<v Speaker 1>of the idea. Rick brook Heiser had a more favorable

920
00:49:29.119 --> 00:49:30.199
<v Speaker 1>review of the book.

921
00:49:30.440 --> 00:49:31.519
<v Speaker 3>Have you had a chance to read it yet?

922
00:49:31.559 --> 00:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And what are people around the office saying if you've

923
00:49:33.360 --> 00:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>been able to talk to him?

924
00:49:34.760 --> 00:49:34.880
<v Speaker 4>So?

925
00:49:34.920 --> 00:49:37.159
<v Speaker 2>I haven't read it yet. I have read a lot

926
00:49:37.159 --> 00:49:39.599
<v Speaker 2>of reviews of it. I've read the two you mentioned,

927
00:49:39.679 --> 00:49:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I've read Matt Continetti, I've read Helen Andrews, and in conversation,

928
00:49:45.079 --> 00:49:48.119
<v Speaker 2>I've spoken to Rich Lowry about it. He's read it

929
00:49:49.320 --> 00:49:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the floor in it, and you've read it, so I

930
00:49:51.440 --> 00:49:54.480
<v Speaker 2>should give you the floor spelled differently. But the flaw

931
00:49:54.639 --> 00:49:59.639
<v Speaker 2>in it that I have most commonly heard related is

932
00:49:59.679 --> 00:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>that it it doesn't seem too interested in the main

933
00:50:02.280 --> 00:50:05.719
<v Speaker 2>achievement of Buckley's life, which was the creation of the

934
00:50:05.760 --> 00:50:07.760
<v Speaker 2>modern conservative movement. Is that true?

935
00:50:08.360 --> 00:50:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think that's right.

936
00:50:09.760 --> 00:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>And he's I'll give you this one very particular sentence

937
00:50:14.239 --> 00:50:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from the book that I thought gives away that I

938
00:50:17.480 --> 00:50:20.599
<v Speaker 1>don't know what penan house purpose was or what his

939
00:50:20.639 --> 00:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>disposition is, but he refers to Reagan's and here's his words,

940
00:50:24.760 --> 00:50:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Reagan's foolhardy invasion of Grenada in nineteen eighty three. I think,

941
00:50:31.119 --> 00:50:34.639
<v Speaker 1>why was that fool hardy. You know, it actually deposed

942
00:50:34.639 --> 00:50:37.559
<v Speaker 1>a communist regime. There were no real threat to America.

943
00:50:37.599 --> 00:50:41.519
<v Speaker 1>But still there was not nothing foolhardy about that, unless

944
00:50:41.559 --> 00:50:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you're somebody deeply on the left who thinks that any

945
00:50:44.239 --> 00:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>use of military force or this is adventurism.

946
00:50:46.639 --> 00:50:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Or or who knows what, boy what.

947
00:50:50.000 --> 00:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe an editor didn't raise a flag about

948
00:50:52.480 --> 00:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that sentence. But I'll add that that's part of the

949
00:50:56.000 --> 00:50:58.159
<v Speaker 1>oddest part of the book is the book goes for

950
00:50:58.880 --> 00:51:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the count has eight one hundred and twenty pages,

951
00:51:01.199 --> 00:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>taking a story of Buckley from his birth in nineteen

952
00:51:03.840 --> 00:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to the election of Reagan in nineteen eighty,

953
00:51:08.079 --> 00:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the period of time from nineteen eighty to

954
00:51:11.519 --> 00:51:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Buckley's passing in two thousand and eight.

955
00:51:15.519 --> 00:51:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Is only forty four pages.

956
00:51:17.400 --> 00:51:19.679
<v Speaker 1>So it's like what he rushed to finish the book,

957
00:51:20.039 --> 00:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he lost interests, because that's when some of the most

958
00:51:23.039 --> 00:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting things happen, is when Buckley's favorite president is in

959
00:51:26.880 --> 00:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>office and they have a frequent communication. Buckley had the

960
00:51:30.960 --> 00:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>private address that Reagan gave him to send notes to

961
00:51:34.039 --> 00:51:37.159
<v Speaker 1>get directly to Reagan and not through some filter. And

962
00:51:37.199 --> 00:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we also know that there was a lot of disagreements

963
00:51:39.360 --> 00:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>between them, especially on arms control and the openings to

964
00:51:43.039 --> 00:51:46.599
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union in the second term. And Buckley himself

965
00:51:46.599 --> 00:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>published some of the excerpts of letters he had with

966
00:51:49.119 --> 00:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Reagan during those years, but none of that appears in

967
00:51:52.480 --> 00:51:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Tannenhouse's book, So I don't know if he was, like

968
00:51:55.599 --> 00:51:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I say, lost interest in the thing. The publisher lost

969
00:51:58.320 --> 00:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>his patients after twenty seven years they expected the book,

970
00:52:04.400 --> 00:52:06.039
<v Speaker 1>or he wanted to get it out in time for

971
00:52:06.079 --> 00:52:08.519
<v Speaker 1>one hundred anniversary of Buckley's birth, which is this year.

972
00:52:09.039 --> 00:52:12.039
<v Speaker 1>But it's very peculiar that way, among the other defects

973
00:52:12.079 --> 00:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the structure of it and the ideological treatment. And

974
00:52:15.039 --> 00:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly I could go on a long time, and I've

975
00:52:16.360 --> 00:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>written a long review that I will flag for everybody

976
00:52:18.960 --> 00:52:19.599
<v Speaker 1>in due course.

977
00:52:19.840 --> 00:52:21.559
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's good that it came out after

978
00:52:21.599 --> 00:52:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Buckley had died. Yes, it's not comfortable. I'm sure to

979
00:52:26.159 --> 00:52:30.360
<v Speaker 2>write an auto a biography of somebody who is still

980
00:52:30.400 --> 00:52:33.960
<v Speaker 2>living twenty seven years that strikes me as a bit excessive.

981
00:52:34.079 --> 00:52:36.920
<v Speaker 2>It's funny you mentioned the disagreements between Reagan and Buckley,

982
00:52:36.960 --> 00:52:39.719
<v Speaker 2>because National Review was very pro Reagan in many ways,

983
00:52:39.920 --> 00:52:43.559
<v Speaker 2>but people forget how cauistic the magazine could be in

984
00:52:43.599 --> 00:52:46.239
<v Speaker 2>the later Reagan years, especially as you say, on arms control.

985
00:52:46.480 --> 00:52:50.639
<v Speaker 2>There was some nineteen eighty five editorial on an arms

986
00:52:50.639 --> 00:52:53.760
<v Speaker 2>control treaty that the Reagan administration was working on that

987
00:52:53.840 --> 00:52:57.559
<v Speaker 2>started this would never have happened if Reagan was still alive.

988
00:53:00.079 --> 00:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, I have had several biographers. Jean Edward Smith,

989
00:53:04.079 --> 00:53:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the late Geen Edward Smith, told me this once that

990
00:53:06.840 --> 00:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you should never write a biography of a living person

991
00:53:11.360 --> 00:53:13.559
<v Speaker 1>because while they're alive, there's just going to be too

992
00:53:13.559 --> 00:53:14.679
<v Speaker 1>many different camps.

993
00:53:14.679 --> 00:53:16.079
<v Speaker 3>And uh oh.

994
00:53:16.119 --> 00:53:19.519
<v Speaker 1>William Manchester found this out way back in the sixties

995
00:53:19.559 --> 00:53:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when Jackie Kennedy asked him to write an account of

996
00:53:22.920 --> 00:53:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the assassination of JFK. And then they didn't like the

997
00:53:26.199 --> 00:53:28.599
<v Speaker 1>result and hounded him for it. And I've heard of

998
00:53:28.639 --> 00:53:29.599
<v Speaker 1>some other biographers.

999
00:53:29.639 --> 00:53:31.079
<v Speaker 2>So on the.

1000
00:53:31.079 --> 00:53:33.320
<v Speaker 1>One hand, I'll bet Tannon House always intended to wait

1001
00:53:33.360 --> 00:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>until Buckley died, and I think disappointed apparently that he

1002
00:53:36.760 --> 00:53:37.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't finish it in time.

1003
00:53:38.360 --> 00:53:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, especially given the Buckley asked Tannon House to

1004
00:53:40.960 --> 00:53:43.000
<v Speaker 2>write the book. I mean, it's one thing to write

1005
00:53:43.039 --> 00:53:46.239
<v Speaker 2>an unauthorized biography of a person who is still alive.

1006
00:53:46.280 --> 00:53:48.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's quite another to deliver the manuscript having been

1007
00:53:48.800 --> 00:53:50.599
<v Speaker 2>asked to do it of somebody who is still alive,

1008
00:53:50.639 --> 00:53:52.280
<v Speaker 2>because if they hate it, the book's dead.

1009
00:53:54.079 --> 00:53:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1010
00:53:54.599 --> 00:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, Nancy Reagan never allowed Van Morris's Dutch, which

1011
00:54:00.400 --> 00:54:03.239
<v Speaker 1>someone said should have been called Botch, to be sold

1012
00:54:03.239 --> 00:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Reagan Library bookstore, even though she was one

1013
00:54:05.440 --> 00:54:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the persons, along with Mike Deaver, who picked Evan

1014
00:54:07.880 --> 00:54:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Morris to write the official biography of Reagan.

1015
00:54:09.840 --> 00:54:11.400
<v Speaker 3>It turned out so strangely.

1016
00:54:11.079 --> 00:54:13.239
<v Speaker 2>So I haven't there you go that book, Steve, you

1017
00:54:13.239 --> 00:54:15.239
<v Speaker 2>can tell me if this is true. So daneshtises A

1018
00:54:15.599 --> 00:54:17.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years ago said that the problem with that

1019
00:54:17.880 --> 00:54:20.920
<v Speaker 2>book is that the author wasn't as interested in Reagan

1020
00:54:20.920 --> 00:54:23.079
<v Speaker 2>as he should have been, so he starts writing by himself.

1021
00:54:23.159 --> 00:54:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Is that true?

1022
00:54:23.679 --> 00:54:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's a good summary. I mean, I'll tell you again,

1023
00:54:27.199 --> 00:54:29.599
<v Speaker 1>there's one sentence that tells you the defect of the book.

1024
00:54:30.599 --> 00:54:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Morris had great access to Reagan, interviewed him lots of times,

1025
00:54:34.280 --> 00:54:38.079
<v Speaker 1>and towards the end of Reagan's presidency, Morris asked him,

1026
00:54:38.159 --> 00:54:41.599
<v Speaker 1>what do you consider to be your greatest achievement? And Reagan,

1027
00:54:41.639 --> 00:54:44.400
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't introspective in that way, but he said, I

1028
00:54:44.440 --> 00:54:46.119
<v Speaker 1>think it has to be my tax cuts and the

1029
00:54:46.199 --> 00:54:49.760
<v Speaker 1>changes in the American tax policy. The next sentence in

1030
00:54:49.800 --> 00:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the book is Morris saying at that at that point,

1031
00:54:52.559 --> 00:54:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I closed my reporter's notebook, So he wasn't interested in

1032
00:54:57.000 --> 00:54:59.159
<v Speaker 1>representing what Reagan isn't it.

1033
00:54:59.239 --> 00:55:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought that just betrayed.

1034
00:55:00.840 --> 00:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>The problem with Morris in that book, just in that

1035
00:55:02.800 --> 00:55:06.599
<v Speaker 1>one sentence, Just like it's similar to Tannanhouse saying, you

1036
00:55:06.599 --> 00:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know Reagan's fool hardy Invasion of Grenada, which is tone

1037
00:55:09.800 --> 00:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>deaf and wrong and so forth.

1038
00:55:11.719 --> 00:55:12.559
<v Speaker 3>So there you go.

1039
00:55:13.159 --> 00:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's always a problem with a biographer who well.

1040
00:55:16.480 --> 00:55:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a piece actually for the Civitas people recently

1041
00:55:18.880 --> 00:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about what makes a good biography, And one of the

1042
00:55:21.519 --> 00:55:23.800
<v Speaker 1>things that makes a bad biography is people who think

1043
00:55:23.840 --> 00:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they're smarter than the subject or or understand their subject

1044
00:55:26.760 --> 00:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>better or differently than they ought to be. They become

1045
00:55:29.519 --> 00:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Freudian or some other nonsense, and those are usually the

1046
00:55:33.760 --> 00:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>worst biographies, and the best ones are the ones that

1047
00:55:36.079 --> 00:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>try to understand their subject as their subject understood themselves,

1048
00:55:41.239 --> 00:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's not always easy to do.

1049
00:55:42.840 --> 00:55:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, it sounds like I'd better read this, although nobody

1050
00:55:45.159 --> 00:55:47.039
<v Speaker 2>who has told me that they have read it has

1051
00:55:47.079 --> 00:55:49.639
<v Speaker 2>said you must go and read this, so it's.

1052
00:55:49.760 --> 00:55:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, god, well it is almost a thousand pages. I

1053
00:55:52.760 --> 00:55:55.199
<v Speaker 1>have to say the wealth of detail is amazing, and

1054
00:55:55.239 --> 00:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>some of it's too much detail and extraneous, but I

1055
00:55:58.760 --> 00:56:00.599
<v Speaker 1>have to say that the wealth of detail, at least

1056
00:56:00.679 --> 00:56:03.039
<v Speaker 1>until you get to nineteen eighty when he loses interest

1057
00:56:03.719 --> 00:56:05.679
<v Speaker 1>here and there you learn some really interesting things.

1058
00:56:06.280 --> 00:56:06.960
<v Speaker 3>So for that.

1059
00:56:06.880 --> 00:56:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Reason it's probably worth reading if you are as devoted

1060
00:56:10.639 --> 00:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to Buckley this memory as I have been from my

1061
00:56:12.880 --> 00:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>entire life.

1062
00:56:14.360 --> 00:56:16.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, I will put it on a list

1063
00:56:16.320 --> 00:56:18.519
<v Speaker 2>of books that I intend to read that are very long.

1064
00:56:18.559 --> 00:56:21.599
<v Speaker 2>That is already itself slightly too long for comfort.

1065
00:56:22.039 --> 00:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have that problem too. Anyway, Charles, glad you're

1066
00:56:25.239 --> 00:56:28.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling better. Welcome back. Do you have any closing thoughts

1067
00:56:28.920 --> 00:56:31.360
<v Speaker 1>or have we worn out what's little little of.

1068
00:56:31.280 --> 00:56:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Your voice you have back so far?

1069
00:56:33.400 --> 00:56:35.079
<v Speaker 2>I think we may have wanted out, but we've won

1070
00:56:35.159 --> 00:56:37.719
<v Speaker 2>it out in an enjoyable way. So the next thing

1071
00:56:37.760 --> 00:56:39.840
<v Speaker 2>for me today is Steve is start drinking wine again.

1072
00:56:40.519 --> 00:56:41.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, right, well.

1073
00:56:41.480 --> 00:56:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to because I'm several hours later than you.

1074
00:56:44.000 --> 00:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>My next stop is going to be the bar after.

1075
00:56:46.920 --> 00:56:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I remind listeners if you haven't all ready to sign

1076
00:56:49.880 --> 00:56:53.079
<v Speaker 1>up as a Ricochet member, join our great community of

1077
00:56:53.159 --> 00:56:57.760
<v Speaker 1>good hearted and civil people, and we will be back

1078
00:56:57.800 --> 00:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>again next week and in the time will look for

1079
00:57:00.960 --> 00:57:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you in the comments of Ricochet four point zero.

1080
00:57:03.679 --> 00:57:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Bye Charles, Bye bye.
