Speaker 1: Hey there, Sorry, I'm early.
Speaker 2: There were times when I was doing Jack that I
Speaker 2: actually felt retarded, like really retarded.
Speaker 3: I mean it brushed my teeth, retarded, I rode busts.
Speaker 4: Retarded in a weird way.
Speaker 5: I had to sort of just free myself up to
Speaker 5: believe that it was okay to be stupid or dumb.
Speaker 6: To be moron yeah, to be moronical exactly, to be
Speaker 6: more an imbecile, yeah, doctor, dumbest motherfucker DEVI live.
Speaker 7: When I was playing the character Wendy was a cure.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 7: I mean, as Jack, definitely Jack, stupid ass Jack. Trying
Speaker 7: to come back from that.
Speaker 4: In a weird way, it was almost like I had
Speaker 4: to sort of fool my mind into believing that it
Speaker 4: wasn't retarded.
Speaker 2: And by the end of the whole thing, I was like,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, you know, I flushed so much out.
Speaker 7: How am I gonna jump started up again?
Speaker 6: It's just like, yeah, yeah, right, he was farting in
Speaker 6: baptubs and lapping your ass off, damn.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Yeah. But simple Jack.
Speaker 10: Thought he was smart, or rather didn't think it was retarded,
Speaker 10: so he can't afford to play retarded being the smart
Speaker 10: actor playing a guy who ain't smart, but thinks he is.
Speaker 7: That's tricky, tricky. It's that working with Mercury. It's high science.
Speaker 7: Man's odd for him. Yeah.
Speaker 3: You an artist, that's what we do, right, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: hats off of going there especially, No, nothing academy.
Speaker 7: Is about that ship.
Speaker 3: M hm.
Speaker 7: About what it's serious? You don't know. Everybody knows you
Speaker 7: never go for retired. What do you mean? Check it out?
Speaker 7: Doesn't often ray Man look retarded? That retarded, not retarded.
Speaker 7: Cat two picks chree your cards autistic shop, not retarded. Yeah,
Speaker 7: Tom Hanks for gun so yes, retarded. Maybe he braced
Speaker 7: his own his legs, but he's trying to pay him
Speaker 7: off next to and they wont a ping pong competition.
Speaker 7: The he't retarded, he was goddamn war hero. You know what,
Speaker 7: he retired war heroes. You went full retard. Man, Never
Speaker 7: go for retarding. You don't buy that, Yeah, Sean Pant
Speaker 7: two thousand one. I understand Mel went full retard, went.
Speaker 11: On Dan.
Speaker 1: All right. Well, Being that this is late as hell,
Speaker 1: most people will probably be watching this later, that's okay,
Speaker 1: that's expected. So what are we doing tonight? Let me
Speaker 1: see if this is even playing on the other spot
Speaker 1: looks like it looks like it might be let see
Speaker 1: doesn't have a what is this ship? Are you serious?
Speaker 1: Hold on one second, I'm trying. Ah, everything's gay. Everything's
Speaker 1: been that. There's something that happened good internet stuff today
Speaker 1: that was not making anything worked properly. So that was
Speaker 1: one of the reasons why thing's got on the delay?
Speaker 1: Is it gonna play this time?
Speaker 7: What I mean?
Speaker 1: Because what the fuck are you talking about? Why it's
Speaker 1: a private? What the fuck are you talking about? Is private?
Speaker 1: It's my you know what? Fuck you, it's not fucking private.
Speaker 1: What the fuck are you talking about? Hold on? This
Speaker 1: is fucking bullshit. I gotta get in here. Everything starts
Speaker 1: off with a like, I uh never said anything as private,
Speaker 1: So now I gotta go in here. Where the hell
Speaker 1: does it say that it's private active? Where does it
Speaker 1: say that it's private, makestream publicly listed? Where the hell
Speaker 1: does it say that it's private? No, nowhere, Nowhere does
Speaker 1: it say that.
Speaker 12: What the fuck?
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, it looks like I'm gonna have to talk
Speaker 1: to Josh about that because there's something jacked up there.
Speaker 1: There's nobody here anywhere, so just deal with it. Why
Speaker 1: is it saying that I need to password to mutch
Speaker 1: my own life stream. Something's fucked up. You got to
Speaker 1: fix it, because if when I click this, it should
Speaker 1: just go right to it, not tell me that this
Speaker 1: life requires a pass. The fuck it does? The fuck
Speaker 1: it does. It doesn't require shit. There's no password in there,
Speaker 1: you fucking liar, stupid, stupid, because I'm looking right at
Speaker 1: the goddamn thing. I'm the one that set it up.
Speaker 1: I'm looking at it. There's no anything. What the hell
Speaker 1: is that? Ooh that was weird. I don't fight like that.
Speaker 1: Get the fuck out here, backup, back up, everything, slow
Speaker 1: as shit? What No one said anything about that. It
Speaker 1: automatically defaulted to a fucking password and I never put
Speaker 1: it in there. Well that's okay, all right, Well let's
Speaker 1: see if it works. Will it work now? But it will? Yay.
Speaker 1: So it decided to add a password. I didn't fucking
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 4: All right.
Speaker 1: Anyway, We're all We're alive on all spots now, all
Speaker 1: two of them. The only piece of place is out.
Speaker 1: Let me be on without jumping through some stupid hue
Speaker 1: pain of fee and still not going on. Thank you
Speaker 1: Twitter for stealing my money and lying to me, now
Speaker 1: we can go full retard, and I think we should
Speaker 1: go to the experts and all things retarded first and
Speaker 1: look into the media here and take a look at
Speaker 1: some of the crap. Oh goodie, oh goody. You gotta
Speaker 1: be fucking kidding me. Never Oh look, I have a
Speaker 1: blue check mark. Does that mean I can freaking stream
Speaker 1: on here now? Facts? Oh well, then it took forty
Speaker 1: eight hours. I don't know. Let's try it. I'll see
Speaker 1: if we can edit that in there? Can I add
Speaker 1: that to it? Let's see? Yeah, see changes, we'll see.
Speaker 1: Oh maybe. Yeah, it looks like we're on Twitter now,
Speaker 1: sweet sweet, all right, well, okay, I can be happy now.
Speaker 1: And it was a delay, but it's it's on. So
Speaker 1: when you look into the Patriot and you'll see that
Speaker 1: there is lots and lots of books. The last one
Speaker 1: I put in there was Edmund Burke Reflections on the
Speaker 1: Revolution in France. Well, that's how I I abbreviated, paraphrased.
Speaker 1: It's a longer title because every book back in a
Speaker 1: certain era. The book itself, the title was about two
Speaker 1: paragraphs along. They wind to let you know everything there
Speaker 1: is to know about the book on the outside of
Speaker 1: the cover. Hmm, And yeah, you think that, like with
Speaker 1: the minds of people today that I discourage them even
Speaker 1: more from picking it up because it's like, wow, that's
Speaker 1: that's a lot of that's some heavy stuff and I
Speaker 1: haven't even opened it yet, too much too much of
Speaker 1: me to think, not just think about, but just think period.
Speaker 1: All right, No, I will Josh put out a video
Speaker 1: today that's pretty interesting, but we'll see if we can
Speaker 1: get to that. But Durna COVID shots cost three percent
Speaker 1: more death than Pfizer CDC data shows who the hell cares?
Speaker 1: Is that? Another dichotomy between what what deadly? Poison? Is
Speaker 1: more deadly than the other. They're all using ancient pharmachea sorcery,
Speaker 1: venoms or things synthetically like venom, and uh yeah, dina
Speaker 1: beads and hydrogel.
Speaker 7: Now is it?
Speaker 1: And then death? This is a stupid This is a
Speaker 1: stupid statistic since they don't report everything, and and the
Speaker 1: things that are reported only a portion of that gets shown.
Speaker 1: Doctors will suppress any complaints that are related to it
Speaker 1: because they want their bonus, So none of this makes
Speaker 1: any sense. And then to say that they're more deadly
Speaker 1: than the other just simply means that people who are idiots,
Speaker 1: we'll say, Okay, well, then let's go to Pfizer guitars. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: fireser's a ticking time bomb that just kills you sometime
Speaker 1: later when they decide to turn on the right frequency
Speaker 1: and rattle apart those little that little hydrogel that's holding
Speaker 1: all the poison inside. Okay, okay, So Maderna is a
Speaker 1: little bit more of a premature executioner. Ranchers sounds alarm
Speaker 1: on mandatory RNA m RNA's vaccines for meat supply. Of course,
Speaker 1: if you won't take it, they'll poison what you're eating.
Speaker 1: I'm sure this is alread happen. This sounds like a
Speaker 1: disclosure after the fact, and probably way after the fact.
Speaker 1: I'm sure this was happening for years three at least.
Speaker 1: More curious evidence emerges in the attempt to even call
Speaker 1: it an attempted assassination against Trump, is itself assumptions that
Speaker 1: that was real. So I'm gonna go ahead and say
Speaker 1: it wasn't a ketchup bracket, But as sir as hell,
Speaker 1: wasn't anything that looked like blood to me, And the
Speaker 1: whole rest of it. The only thing that looks somewhat
Speaker 1: like real blood.
Speaker 7: Was thiss?
Speaker 1: I thought that was covering the other dude? What the
Speaker 1: media want to tell you about JD. Vance Trump's pick
Speaker 1: for the vice president? Do we want to read that
Speaker 1: maybe two teams a residents shooting across Charlotte, North Carolina?
Speaker 1: Older teen is Honduran illegal alien? Is that supposed to
Speaker 1: surprise us? Guess where I'm going to be for our
Speaker 1: We're not leaving the airport, but it's just a connector flight.
Speaker 1: But that's it. We're gonna be a Charlotte. California banned
Speaker 1: schools from notifying parents of child's gender identity changes. Governor
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom and Democrats and California passed a new bill
Speaker 1: into law that prohibit schools. You know what, This is
Speaker 1: why people should be dragged from out of their mansions
Speaker 1: and justice should be taken this. This is full blown retarded.
Speaker 1: Any parent that puts up with this, any governmental body
Speaker 1: who would pass a bill like this, This is predatory
Speaker 1: against children whom they're already brainwashing into cutting off their
Speaker 1: body parts and putting balloon skin animals into between their
Speaker 1: legs and sewing them there. This is evil. California Band
Speaker 1: schools from notifying parents. No, you don't get to override
Speaker 1: the parents to play. No, No, I don't give a
Speaker 1: fuck what you decide to do on the outside. That's
Speaker 1: not lawful, it's not real, it's not natural, and as
Speaker 1: sure as hell isn't okay. And if parents don't know that,
Speaker 1: they can't that they will never even know when their
Speaker 1: children are being groomed and mutilated. It's not even about well,
Speaker 1: this doesn't affect me because I don't have children, or
Speaker 1: this doesn't affect me because I do homeschool. You don't
Speaker 1: really do a whole lot of homeschooling in California. At
Speaker 1: number one, it's not easy. It's not as easy as
Speaker 1: it is other places. They will harass you and threaten
Speaker 1: you with CPS and shit like that to bring you
Speaker 1: to the public schools unless you're an enrolled in like
Speaker 1: a charter or something like that. But those are just
Speaker 1: as bad. Those are just as bad. So now if
Speaker 1: we're getting state or federal money, then they have to
Speaker 1: take the state in federal bullshit that goes with it.
Speaker 1: And that's the problem. Once again, the Jew money destroys
Speaker 1: all things because then you're under contractual obligation in a
Speaker 1: sense because you want that money to keep coming and
Speaker 1: you start balancing your budget with it, and any threat, well,
Speaker 1: then you better teach them CRT. Are you better to
Speaker 1: push gender politics on them? Are you better tell them
Speaker 1: to all the wonders of a gay life to a
Speaker 1: six year old?
Speaker 7: Right?
Speaker 1: This is this is full retard. And Gavin Newsom if
Speaker 1: he if he comes out to be the elected or sorry,
Speaker 1: not the elected, but the the propped up fuck in
Speaker 1: place of Biden, you best remember this. You best remember
Speaker 1: what they're doing right here, because this is not cool.
Speaker 1: What did I just do.
Speaker 13: That?
Speaker 1: California bann schools from notifying How can California choose to
Speaker 1: ban bands schools from spans notifying parents? How do you
Speaker 1: do that? How do you do that of child's gender
Speaker 1: identity changes changes? Do you understand this predator? This is
Speaker 1: the biggest jew evil ever on the planet. They want
Speaker 1: to destroy your family. They want to destroy your children
Speaker 1: so they can never ever turn back on that. They're
Speaker 1: going to screw them up hormonally and physically so that
Speaker 1: they can never have children or normal life. And if
Speaker 1: you try to intervene, they put the parents in jail.
Speaker 1: And if and now they're not even and now they're
Speaker 1: not even gonna tell you that they're mutilating or grooming
Speaker 1: your children. Their children go to school in one set
Speaker 1: of clothes, they've got a different set in their backpack,
Speaker 1: and they've become Dorothy instead of Donnie. Governor Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: and Democrats in California passed a new bill into law.
Speaker 1: I don't understand what this even means. How do you
Speaker 1: have the right the authority? What gives them the authority
Speaker 1: to well, we made.
Speaker 7: It a law.
Speaker 1: Well, how did you have the authority to make that
Speaker 1: a law? Because nobody said that you didn't, because this
Speaker 1: goes against like basic common sense. The state is not
Speaker 1: and I know this is a communist thing, but the
Speaker 1: state is not in the higher position than the parent
Speaker 1: when it comes to the child. I don't give a
Speaker 1: fuck what they think and what they want or what
Speaker 1: you know the State Department, under the wicked witch of
Speaker 1: the freaking West, Hillary Clinton had done. It's not that
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. No civilization can exist or continue to
Speaker 1: exist with this type of rot and no children? What
Speaker 1: about the children in the between? Not just numbers on
Speaker 1: a sheet, These are lives, These are These are people's
Speaker 1: children that we're talking about. Nobody loves anything more than
Speaker 1: their children and those their pieces of ship. And then
Speaker 1: that's not who I'm talking about here. Build it into
Speaker 1: law that prohibits schools from notifying parents if their child
Speaker 1: uses different pronouns or changes their gender identity at school,
Speaker 1: changes their gender identity at school. What are they gonna do?
Speaker 1: Flop right on a fucking nurse's office table and just
Speaker 1: have to have some surgeries done, set them off to
Speaker 1: a place to have it, have it taken care of
Speaker 1: all the tax money. What are we talking about here?
Speaker 1: Taking the hormone pills? A lawsuit filed by the Chino
Speaker 1: Chino Really he managed to do it off there? A
Speaker 1: lawsuit filed at Chino Value Unified School Districts related to
Speaker 1: that Assembly bill win nine to five to five that
Speaker 1: will take effect January first, twenty twenty five. Violates the
Speaker 1: constitutional rights of parents due to the pro to do process
Speaker 1: and freedom of religion. Fuck the freedom of religion, the
Speaker 1: constitutional rights of parents, period fucking end. Forget constitutional rights.
Speaker 1: All this verbiage is bullshit. Violates rights of parents, forget constitutional,
Speaker 1: forget religion, violates rights of parents. Who the fuck are
Speaker 1: you to tell me how my child is going to
Speaker 1: be raised, and who are you to tell me that
Speaker 1: I'm going to be kept out of it anybody? This
Speaker 1: is why they want to take away firearms, because a
Speaker 1: real parent would put this motherfucker and this whole entire
Speaker 1: minutmistration right where they belong. Did you processly freedom religion?
Speaker 1: It seeks a court judgment declaring that that a new
Speaker 1: law is a violation of parents' rights under the fourteenth
Speaker 1: and First Amendment. This isn't that you don't have to
Speaker 1: go through all these stupid legal leasee bullshit rules. You
Speaker 1: just don't put up with it. You say, no, this
Speaker 1: isn't outrageous. We shouldn't have to look at the Constitution
Speaker 1: to see whether or not we should be predators against children,
Speaker 1: our children to who the fuck you are you and
Speaker 1: what type of power do you think you wield because
Speaker 1: you do not, you apac freaking funded pieces of shit,
Speaker 1: freaking straight up communism. Let me play it this way.
Speaker 1: If Gavin Newsom is ends up being in the position
Speaker 1: that I think is gonna end up being in, well,
Speaker 1: because doctor Peter Glinnon thinks it's going to be and
Speaker 1: I'm I'm pretty sure you might.
Speaker 7: Be right.
Speaker 1: Then the day Kennedy's have come to fruition because they
Speaker 1: they did their song about Governor Jerry Brown in California,
Speaker 1: uber allis well, Gavin and Brown are best of buddies.
Speaker 8: The families are really tight and close. So since time
Speaker 8: has gone by, it would be Governor Newsome or you know,
Speaker 8: same guy in the same place still California Uberlis though
Speaker 8: California most high right, so that means I think we're
Speaker 8: gonna go with Deutsch Leander Alis. But anyway, anyway.
Speaker 1: This seeks to the court judgment declaring to the law
Speaker 1: has drawn some controversy, oh has it now, with Elon
Speaker 1: Musk even announcing plans to move SpaceX and social platform
Speaker 1: X formerly known as Twitter out of the state in response.
Speaker 1: A school district is Elon's is a freaking high moneyed
Speaker 1: demon who's pretending who's rubbing knobs, And that's exactly what
Speaker 1: I but it sounds like it means with Peter Thiel
Speaker 1: and all those other queers, pallenteer Ai Grock bullshit. Okay,
Speaker 1: don't don't get me, don't get me started on that
Speaker 1: idiot and everything called an X. There's a meat reason
Speaker 1: behind that and it's cryptic and it's esoteric, and it's
Speaker 1: not good. The law has drawn some controversy with with
Speaker 1: mister play player, mister liar. It's just a figurehead, guys,
Speaker 1: he's not bright even play Even PayPal used to be
Speaker 1: called x. You know, it's funny when you go to
Speaker 1: pay your stupid premium account on Twitter, you can't use PayPal.
Speaker 1: A school disticking in southern California is suing Governor Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom over a new state law that will prohibit public
Speaker 1: schools from being required to notify parents when their children
Speaker 1: change gender identities. Well that's kind of a big fucking thing.
Speaker 1: How dis bought like? How like disconnected? Are the parents
Speaker 1: not to see this going on?
Speaker 2: Anyway?
Speaker 1: Parents are painted at these as these big, scary, bad
Speaker 1: demon people that oh my god, they showed they require
Speaker 1: discipline and responsibility from their children, and they're just such
Speaker 1: tyrants that they could never go to them and talk
Speaker 1: to them about it about their about Hey, you know
Speaker 1: these queers are trying to get me to be queer
Speaker 1: with them over at school, or you know, they want
Speaker 1: me to cut off my genitalia for sybil. What do
Speaker 1: you think should I do it? They act like, there's
Speaker 1: no they want that to be no communication divide Otherwise
Speaker 1: you wouldn't have a problem. If this wasn't a horrible
Speaker 1: thing to do, then why would they care if their
Speaker 1: parents found out before it was too late? Why would
Speaker 1: it be such a big deal if it wasn't such
Speaker 1: a horrible, evil, wicked, unconscionable fucking thing for the school
Speaker 1: to be involved in. And who the hell is the school?
Speaker 1: Who the hell is the school to be pushing that
Speaker 1: in the first place? Never mind even the freaking government
Speaker 1: for saying that they don't have to tell anybody. Who's
Speaker 1: the school to be doing that? Where's the money coming from?
Speaker 1: And around and round we go. Where does money come from? Period?
Speaker 7: You know?
Speaker 1: The fuckers who prin it? What type of people are there?
Speaker 1: They chosen? Are they the chosen? The lawsuit filed Tuesday
Speaker 1: by Chino Blah blah Blah Assembly Blah, Whish News Society
Speaker 1: to the law, I will make same thing you heard
Speaker 1: before in court filing. Pinons argue that, yeah, the rest
Speaker 1: of it doesn't matter. If a student is bullied or
Speaker 1: involved in verbal or physical fight, the school will tell
Speaker 1: the parents. If a student expresses a desire to hurt
Speaker 1: or kill himself, the school will tell the parents. The
Speaker 1: lawsuit states so to must say school tell a parent
Speaker 1: if a student has asked the school to participate in
Speaker 1: a student's gender transition. They're talking straight up about the surgery.
Speaker 1: So desire to hurt or kill himself versus gender transition.
Speaker 1: What's difference between you hurt yourself and cut off your cock?
Speaker 1: If I may be so bold, I know that's pretty
Speaker 1: hard word. Desire to hurt and potentially kill themselves if
Speaker 1: they do it the old fashioned way castration and gender transit.
Speaker 1: So I don't see a big difference there. You are
Speaker 1: hurting yourself, you're cutting something off of your body, or
Speaker 1: you're hormonally fucking yourself up with pills or injections, all
Speaker 1: things that nobody should be walking into when you don't
Speaker 1: even have the age of consent right to be making
Speaker 1: those this visions for yourself. But they've already screwed that up,
Speaker 1: and they don't even talk about that as being a
Speaker 1: They don't even talk about that aspect of it. You're
Speaker 1: you're six years old, you're you're you're a man. Now,
Speaker 1: you're you're you're a woman. Now you get to choose
Speaker 1: whether or not you want to be that woman or
Speaker 1: man now and response to some office blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he did. The lawsuit doesn't have legal basis. Well,
Speaker 1: not the way they've worded it.
Speaker 7: I agree.
Speaker 1: They should have worded it with a click of a
Speaker 1: of a magazine into the magwell, and then the pulling
Speaker 1: of you know what I mean. That's how they should
Speaker 1: have argued that, easy garden. I'm not joking. This is
Speaker 1: not This is not something to fucking dance around with
Speaker 1: and play politics with. This is at an assault. This
Speaker 1: is an assault on the innocent and the government getting involved
Speaker 1: with it, the government actually pushing it. Let's get real
Speaker 1: with it. We don't need to go through all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff about how stupid they are and
Speaker 1: how they're going to misdirect even this, because this is
Speaker 1: of course need to know news, and they do. Even
Speaker 1: if they tell you something as awful as this, they'll
Speaker 1: have some stupid thing where they don't ever to clarify
Speaker 1: the right way to address it. They'll just tell you
Speaker 1: about how the idiots who take control of the other
Speaker 1: side so that that doesn't succeed are are steering it.
Speaker 1: And that's the problem. They've already got their idiots out
Speaker 1: here with their stupid Assembly bill and they're gonna they've
Speaker 1: already this is, this is this is what you don't see,
Speaker 1: and I see most people don't see. Maybe you do
Speaker 1: the lawsuit file tuesday. Now that's the one that jumps
Speaker 1: ahead of anybody else who might have been doing that,
Speaker 1: like parents individuals, class action of parents. They're going to
Speaker 1: send this one out first, talk about this one. If
Speaker 1: any other ones show up, they'll be secondary to this one,
Speaker 1: and nobody will know about them, and nobody will pay
Speaker 1: attend and they won't get the publicity because this one's
Speaker 1: going to suck up all the attention and it's going
Speaker 1: to be self defeating, drive itself on the ground, and
Speaker 1: try to do it on a basis that's so stupid
Speaker 1: that it's going to skew the minds of other people
Speaker 1: who have a problem with this and think that this
Speaker 1: is the right route to go, because it's not, and
Speaker 1: it's destined for failure. But that's on purpose, because this
Speaker 1: is just the fake opposition that's also being funded by
Speaker 1: the same pieces of shit, because they're going to control
Speaker 1: that so that they can actually push this through. It's
Speaker 1: already been done. It's already law now apparently. So this
Speaker 1: is just this is just formality, theatrics bullshit, so that
Speaker 1: it looks like there's something opposing it, period the end,
Speaker 1: and it's disjointed, it's lopsided, it's it's inconsistent with it,
Speaker 1: with reason and logic, and that's how they're going to
Speaker 1: argue it over the constitutional rights of parents. That doesn't
Speaker 1: even fuck it. That's not even a thing. It's not
Speaker 1: even a thing. It has nothing to what they're talking
Speaker 1: about here. And freedom of religion. Freedom of religion, What
Speaker 1: the fucks you have to do with cutting off your
Speaker 1: fucking genitals? It doesn't you know what I mean? People
Speaker 1: are retarded. I'll see if I can back this up
Speaker 1: and see if some of those is anybody out there yet.
Speaker 1: Let's try this one. Let's see if you see it. No,
Speaker 1: you still see the other one, all right, I gotta
Speaker 1: I gotta drop this one and get a new one.
Speaker 1: If anybody's out there, say something to go away, go away,
Speaker 1: here goes. If you're out there, say something. We got
Speaker 1: some people over on Twitter. Hey, it's about time they
Speaker 1: let me back on there. Yes, I fought for you.
Speaker 1: I even paid the eight dollars for you three fucking
Speaker 1: people over there. I expect it back eight That was
Speaker 1: a month. There's three of you there. You can come
Speaker 1: up with it. There's six months. It's late and everybody's
Speaker 1: already drunk. It's Friday night. But whatever. I'm leaving today
Speaker 1: at five am, six am to go to the airport,
Speaker 1: which is three and a half hours away. Yeah, good times.
Speaker 1: And since there wasn't anybody here for the first time around,
Speaker 1: and now there's people here, maybe we should play this again.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, hold on, I gotta do it from the thing.
Speaker 1: Let's do it from the thing. I'm go into mine
Speaker 1: used to water. There was nobody here before, so hold on,
Speaker 1: hold on, all right, you ready, because it's it's that day.
Speaker 1: It's that day. I think the whole I think the
Speaker 1: whole conversation.
Speaker 11: Is.
Speaker 1: Actually, guys, it wouldn't be full retard Friday if I
Speaker 1: did it on Friday. You know what I mean. You
Speaker 1: can't go full retard if you're not if you're doing
Speaker 1: it on the correct day. So don't give me ship there.
Speaker 1: And I didn't start on time because you can't go
Speaker 1: full retard if you start on time. Thank you. You're
Speaker 1: welcome here. It is for those of you out there.
Speaker 1: I know you didn't see it ahead of times, so
Speaker 1: there you go.
Speaker 7: Exactly.
Speaker 2: You know, there were times when I was doing Jack
Speaker 2: that I actually felt retarded, like really retarded. I mean
Speaker 2: it brushed my teeth, retarded, I rode bust retarded in
Speaker 2: a weird way.
Speaker 5: I had to sort of just free myself up to
Speaker 5: believe that it was okay to be stupid or dumb.
Speaker 6: To be moron yeah, to be moronical exactly, to be
Speaker 6: more an imbecile, yeah, doctor dumbest.
Speaker 7: Motherfucker devile.
Speaker 2: When I was playing the character.
Speaker 6: Wendy was secure, I mean, as Jack, definitely Jack, stupid
Speaker 6: ass Jack.
Speaker 7: Trying to come back from that.
Speaker 4: In a weird way, it was almost like I had
Speaker 4: to sort of fool my mind into believing that it
Speaker 4: wasn't retarded.
Speaker 5: And by the end of the whole thing, I was like,
Speaker 5: wait a minute, you know, I flushed so much out, How.
Speaker 7: Am I gonna jump started up again? It's just like, yeah, yeah, right,
Speaker 7: he was farting in bathtubs and laughing your ass off. Damn.
Speaker 7: Yeah yeah, but simple.
Speaker 10: Jack thought he was smart, or rather didn't think it
Speaker 10: was retarded. So he can't afford to play retarded.
Speaker 7: Being a smart actor playing a guy who ain't smart
Speaker 7: but thinks he is. That's tricky. Tricky is that working
Speaker 7: with Mercury it's high science man, it's odd for him. Yeah.
Speaker 3: You an artist, that's what we do, right, Yeah, Yeah,
Speaker 3: hats off of going there, especially knowing nothing academy is
Speaker 3: about that, shit.
Speaker 7: About what it's serious. You don't know. Everybody knows. You
Speaker 7: never go fook retarding. What do you mean? Check it out?
Speaker 7: Doesn't often? Ray Man looked retarded. That retarded, not retarded,
Speaker 7: cant two picks, cheated cards, autistic shop not retarded. Yeah,
Speaker 7: Tim Hans for hist Gump, So yes, retarded. Maybe he
Speaker 7: braces on his legs, but he's trying to pants off
Speaker 7: next to it. And they won a pin punk competition.
Speaker 7: That ain't retarded. He was goddamn war hero. You know
Speaker 7: what he retarded? War heroes. You went full retard man,
Speaker 7: Never go full retarding. You don't buy that. As Sean
Speaker 7: Pant two thousand one, I am saying member went full retarding,
Speaker 7: went on empty.
Speaker 1: All right, inkkeeping with full retired. I had a mouthful
Speaker 1: of pint burn some choco chips in my mouth. Yeah,
Speaker 1: my best thing to do when you're talking on a
Speaker 1: live stream is I have a big spoonful of peanut butter.
Speaker 1: But dark chocolate morsels that you put in there are
Speaker 1: now you know how I snack? What you think? So
Speaker 1: we're going through the news and this is the next round. Here,
Speaker 1: let's see what we got besides peanut butter in my mouth.
Speaker 1: One second, I kept one side of my suitcase open
Speaker 1: for my daughter so we can cram everything in there
Speaker 1: and then still have our take our own case. I'll
Speaker 1: pay the extra forty bucks for it in case grandparents
Speaker 1: give her stuff. We'll have the two suitcases anyway, so
Speaker 1: we can pick it back. And Rebecca it's like, well,
Speaker 1: just have a meal. I'm like, yeah, let's spend an
Speaker 1: extra thirty forty fifty dollars per package to do that,
Speaker 1: or let's just pend the fucking forty dollars now and
Speaker 1: just do what I fucking said. Anyway, So my hat,
Speaker 1: my side of the suitcase, this big suitcase is still empty.
Speaker 1: She already went to bed and we're leaving soon. Where
Speaker 1: the fuck is the stuff put it in there? Where
Speaker 1: the fuck? What the fuck are you doing? Anyway? Metas
Speaker 1: creepy is getting a deep security idea. Former elite special
Speaker 1: forces snipers says, no way Trump would be Trump would
Speaker 1: be assassin acted alone, God acted was the only part
Speaker 1: of that sentence that made any sense. Acted acted, but
Speaker 1: didn't realize that they weren't gonna be shooting blanks at him.
Speaker 1: Uh Thomas, Yeah, Thomas Crooks, the accused Trump shooter appeared
Speaker 1: at a black Rock commercial. Wasn't maybe even him who
Speaker 1: was the shooter? And this was a trope that they
Speaker 1: put out there so people would talk about this. Who
Speaker 1: fuck cares if it was on Blackrock commercial?
Speaker 7: The ap?
Speaker 1: What does that even mean? Tell me what that means
Speaker 1: to people? What does that mean to anybody? Anyone? Okay,
Speaker 1: what does that mean? What conclusion are you drawing from that?
Speaker 1: It happened It was a school setting that he went
Speaker 1: to a school, and therefore was part of the commercial
Speaker 1: that they filmed at that school. What deep fucking ties
Speaker 1: to Blackrock does he have because he was at a
Speaker 1: school that Blackrock did a fucking commercial at. Can everybody
Speaker 1: shut up now? Awesome, let's move on. The ape reported
Speaker 1: a police officer climbed to the roof, saw the shooter
Speaker 1: and retreated yes, we heard all this, So this is
Speaker 1: what we're gonna be inundated with from now on, A
Speaker 1: bunch of bullshit that just assumes that the whole thing
Speaker 1: was real. Judge can't. And this is what the chosen people,
Speaker 1: the cutthroats and bandits, the road thieves, the people who
Speaker 1: conduct usery want you to do. They want you to
Speaker 1: forget that Trump is the silver crowned king of the Torah,
Speaker 1: silver crown king of the Jews. They want you to
Speaker 1: forget that he thinks that the whaling wall is going
Speaker 1: to fall down like everyone else and has to hold
Speaker 1: it up with his hand. It is kind of bold.
Speaker 1: So fucking fuck Trump. And that's not dreamer syndrome, it's
Speaker 1: just logic. What would endear him? And shut up about
Speaker 1: this whole wounded in the head shit beat it's wounded
Speaker 1: on that could have everything to do with the same
Speaker 1: thing that drugs, the same thing that AniOne was talking
Speaker 1: about with the drugs have nothing to do with the
Speaker 1: way that you're reading it through the Hebrew bullshit language
Speaker 1: that they rewrote it in. So just stop, just stop
Speaker 1: with all that I'm reading the Bible and trying to
Speaker 1: make sense of anything that comes out of it. It's bullshit.
Speaker 1: Shut up. Stop trying to make the Bible real. It's not.
Speaker 1: It's the same fuckers who lie about everything else who
Speaker 1: gave you a book, and you're a fucking idiot if
Speaker 1: you think that, oh my gosh, revelingimrita, that God's doing this.
Speaker 1: Shut the fuck up. You hear me out there, Nemos,
Speaker 1: thank you. Shut the fuck up. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you would even have said that. I just feel like
Speaker 1: telling him to shut up. Yes for fun controversy. Okay,
Speaker 1: So I went from having three hundred this is how
Speaker 1: fickle you pricks over at Twitter are I had three
Speaker 1: hundre and eighteen people there. I missed a couple of
Speaker 1: days because they stop letting me do streams, and now
Speaker 1: I'm not on to three hundred eleven. Fuck you. You
Speaker 1: know it's nice about three eleven though people said this
Speaker 1: about the band. I don't believe it the band three
Speaker 1: eleven because they're definitely not that type and there's a
Speaker 1: bunch of different people's types in there. But it says, oh,
Speaker 1: three eleven, that's like three ks three KKK retards. Anyhow, Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's nothing good in the news on that side, and
Speaker 1: how long have I been on? For thirty six minutes?
Speaker 1: I have to look over at the rumble and see
Speaker 1: if there's anything going on. There's people watching, but nobody talking.
Speaker 1: That's not cool. Maybe they're drunk, too drunk. It's Fridays
Speaker 1: one o'clock in the morning, could possibly be four o'clock
Speaker 1: were there. Can't really blame them, and what else we
Speaker 1: got going on? I can put up something that I
Speaker 1: really think you would enjoy, but I don't like it
Speaker 1: then much. I don't like you enough to think that
Speaker 1: I was just about to get back on the Trump train.
Speaker 7: Hahaha.
Speaker 1: I think he's been funny. I can't believe anybody would
Speaker 1: even listen to this guy. What a fake and a fraud.
Speaker 1: Hope he's not talking about me. Oh no, I don't
Speaker 1: even know what to think anymore. This doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: be somebody that Trump would even entertain. Oh, I think
Speaker 1: he's talking about that JD Vance guy. But I still
Speaker 1: don't understand, Like, why do would you care what Trump
Speaker 1: would entertain? Who cares? Fuck cares?
Speaker 7: Who cares? Who cares?
Speaker 13: Who cares?
Speaker 1: All Right, I'm gonna I'm gonna default over the astral
Speaker 1: logos because this is the last part of the thing
Speaker 1: I wanted you guys to watch, which is actually the
Speaker 1: first part of the series that I never went to.
Speaker 1: Oh Faith No More in concert twenty fifteen. Nice wow. Alright, anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to start doing some uh pro pro
Speaker 1: building shows. I gotta get my IFBB pro card. I'm
Speaker 1: just kidding. I think I've got long ways to go there.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go to Asha logos here. Oh look,
Speaker 1: it's sorry on there.
Speaker 7: Sweet.
Speaker 1: Don't if you if you don't like to read books
Speaker 1: about gargling your your own stuff and other people's for
Speaker 1: twenty years of your life. I'm not joking about this,
Speaker 1: don't watch, don't, don't, don't get involved in the box
Speaker 1: saga nonsense, because that's literally what that book talks about constantly.
Speaker 1: Somebody's like, oh, that's talking about an alternate history. I'm like,
Speaker 1: it's also talking about sucking your own dick for like
Speaker 1: twenty years. So uh, you know, take that with a grain.
Speaker 1: Lock was a very flamboyant mister guy. Ah right, So
Speaker 1: we got thirty eight minutes on this one. This talks
Speaker 1: about Lord Hirdal and some misconceptions about sea travel that
Speaker 1: people would have you believe are somehow obstacles rather than highways,
Speaker 1: and how people may have moved around in the past.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna go right back to saying why Scythian
Speaker 1: Mound building seems to have shilled shown up in the
Speaker 1: Americas And oh, I don't know where those those structures
Speaker 1: that they showed around the early years that the World's
Speaker 1: fair there for a really long time, and where they
Speaker 1: just remnants that they had to get rid of eventually.
Speaker 1: But they had like, I don't know, like a final rah. Right,
Speaker 1: they had one last show and then they're right now,
Speaker 1: we're gonna doctrinate the rest and they're gonna get rid
Speaker 1: of all this sort of stuff. Who knows? Who knows?
Speaker 1: I don't think they came to an empty continent when
Speaker 1: the this the uh, the exiles from the fourteen ninety two, Uh,
Speaker 1: they got kicked out of Spain to chosen once and
Speaker 1: it just so happened that there's a there's three bullets
Speaker 1: headed their way over here with whoever was left sure thing.
Speaker 1: Sure thing I argue with that if you want to
Speaker 1: be wrong, it's up to you. It's up to you
Speaker 1: if you'd like to be wrong, all right, So let's
Speaker 1: do this. Let's go to the bu that one.
Speaker 14: K yep.
Speaker 1: I'm reading mind confident by the way pages.
Speaker 7: I think.
Speaker 1: The most effective way to destroy people is to deny
Speaker 1: and obliterate their own understanding of their history. Richard Marx,
Speaker 1: maybe Karl Marx, hell, maybe Emperor Chin could be anybody, really, oh, Georgie.
Speaker 9: So how is it that we can best hope to
Speaker 9: know ourselves as individuals? We live short lives with fallible minds,
Speaker 9: prone to delusion. It's so easy to deceive ourselves with
Speaker 9: regards to our true nature. We can come to identify
Speaker 9: ourselves with the things we possess, or ephemeral beliefs we hold,
Speaker 9: or arbitrary lines drawn on a map, or are man
Speaker 9: made political or cultural labels. At the end of the day,
Speaker 9: none of this is deeply real because none of it
Speaker 9: is innate. Coming from the inside out, the blood flowing
Speaker 9: through our veins is real. The genetic code that informs
Speaker 9: every cell in our body how to best express itself
Speaker 9: is something we inherit, something within us. When seeking to
Speaker 9: understand one's self, looking back at one's life can be informative,
Speaker 9: but this is a short period of time replete with
Speaker 9: personal errors and missteps and even more importantly, liable to
Speaker 9: be misunderstood or misinterpreted. But what if we'd lived one
Speaker 9: thousand lives before, in slightly different manifestations and projections amidst
Speaker 9: countless environments and conditions across this amount of time. This
Speaker 9: is the power of history. The blood that flows through
Speaker 9: your veins has lived before countless times before, and understanding
Speaker 9: of our roots helps inform us of who we are
Speaker 9: and how to best be and grow. Cut off from
Speaker 9: this understanding, we can't help but live in confusion and anxiety.
Speaker 9: It's a state of true ignorance. There's nothing more informative
Speaker 9: than an accurate picture of history. It's not only a
Speaker 9: record of our own personal journey, but of the intersection
Speaker 9: and intertwining of all journeys and a multitude of unique circumstances.
Speaker 9: Obtaining a totality of perfect context here, if such a
Speaker 9: thing were possible, would lead to an unprecedented level of
Speaker 9: understanding of ourselves and our reality. Historical context is crucial,
Speaker 9: and without it, we're very much unmoored beings. We live
Speaker 9: in the age of the atomized individual, an age in
Speaker 9: which we're taught that we're all blank slates and fresh
Speaker 9: starts entirely shaped by our environmental impulses. And it's true
Speaker 9: that your every external impulse el does shape the expression
Speaker 9: of the true you within. But at our deepest levels,
Speaker 9: the blood flowing through our veins and the genes we
Speaker 9: were gifted with still remained the central pillar around which
Speaker 9: all else rotates, the pillar that contains all possible expressions
Speaker 9: within it. Understanding this central pillar is profoundly important. I've
Speaker 9: begun this video series to help counteract what I see
Speaker 9: as an attempt at obfuscating, mischaracterizing, or destroying our understanding
Speaker 9: of our collective central pillar, the subversion of our conception
Speaker 9: of history and of our historical roots. What scant history
Speaker 9: we're now taught is often dull and lifeless, a recitation
Speaker 9: of dry facts and figures by professors who feel no
Speaker 9: connection to the subject matter, a tedious sermon, often delivered
Speaker 9: in a nasal monotone. But it's more than just poorly delivered.
Speaker 9: It's often wildly dishonest, misinformative, robbing us of that power
Speaker 9: that comes from true understanding. One can't properly orient and
Speaker 9: direct their future unless they understand their past, and a
Speaker 9: true understanding isn't communicated by the clinical and attached memorization
Speaker 9: of trivia and pointless details, but in the deeper understanding
Speaker 9: and feeling the collective experiences of their ancestors. This will
Speaker 9: be the most important video I've made thus far, as
Speaker 9: well as the most daunting, difficult, controversial, and dangerous to
Speaker 9: my channel. I've long asked myself the question, how should
Speaker 9: one best act when they come to no important truths
Speaker 9: against which the majority of the population has been deeply prejudiced,
Speaker 9: programmed to not only reject, but to miss understand the
Speaker 9: intent behind their voicing. We're now in such dire straits
Speaker 9: that the best path forward is clear, regardless of the
Speaker 9: cost of doing so. These truths must be told. We
Speaker 9: need to realize our hand has been forced, and if
Speaker 9: we don't drop our pathological and suicidal altruism and begin
Speaker 9: to courageously speak truths once again, it's our own future
Speaker 9: generations that I'll pay the price for our cowardice and dishonesty.
Speaker 9: Over time, I'll certainly receive a backlash from several subsets
Speaker 9: of people, and I fully understand it. For years, they've
Speaker 9: been exposed to the most backward pseudoscience, wearing the mask
Speaker 9: of legitimate thought on the topics of race, human history, genetics,
Speaker 9: human migrations. They've been subjected to the most intellectually lazy
Speaker 9: lumping together of race realism with racial hatred. Most of
Speaker 9: us recognized the subversion of our financial and political systems,
Speaker 9: our media, and entertainment. When I began to see similar
Speaker 9: red flags with regards to the teaching of history, I
Speaker 9: became a skeptic overnight, I should clarify, I became a
Speaker 9: true skeptic in the proper definition of the word, which
Speaker 9: meant I became the polar opposite of those who call
Speaker 9: themselves skeptics today, the type who have never met a
Speaker 9: conventional narrative pushed by the status quo that they didn't
Speaker 9: unthinkingly embrace and seek to defend with dogmatic fervor. Over time,
Speaker 9: I felt unable to trust any source of information implicitly,
Speaker 9: because even those with genuine intent can be hoodwinked by
Speaker 9: reading the materials of those with less genuine intent. So
Speaker 9: I instead sought to immerse myself only in root historical sources,
Speaker 9: meaning the older, the better, and the more first and
Speaker 9: the better. To this day, I believe this to be
Speaker 9: the best approach to a landscape so rife with subversion
Speaker 9: and sloppy thinking. I've always found it amusing how many
Speaker 9: conventional thinkers approach conspiracies or any nefarious actions behind the
Speaker 9: scenes as a virtual impossibility. They basically trust our system
Speaker 9: and our media and make the argument that in any
Speaker 9: significant conspiracy, someone would have to talk, and thus the
Speaker 9: entire house of cards would fall. This is an idea
Speaker 9: so absurd it deserves its own video. But to briefly summarize,
Speaker 9: not only does our controlled press routinely ignore whistleblowers or
Speaker 9: inconvenient truth tellers of every stripe to avoid biting the
Speaker 9: hand that feeds them, but this whistleblower conception isn't how
Speaker 9: such things actually transpire in the real world. The vast
Speaker 9: majority of people involved in any conspiracy are completely obligve
Speaker 9: to the role they play within it. I believe this
Speaker 9: holds true for most of those currently working together to
Speaker 9: subvert our understanding of history. There was a quote I
Speaker 9: recently posted to Twitter that I haven't been able to
Speaker 9: stop thinking about since, as it so perfectly illustrates how
Speaker 9: most conspiratorial subversion actually takes place over time. Quote the
Speaker 9: smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to
Speaker 9: strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very
Speaker 9: lively debate within that spectrum, even encourage the more critical
Speaker 9: and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's
Speaker 9: prethinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of
Speaker 9: the system are being reinforced by the limits put on
Speaker 9: the range of the debate. Think about this quote in
Speaker 9: the context of race. We no longer allow positive things
Speaker 9: to be said about those of an Indo European background
Speaker 9: as a group, and simultaneously we not only allow but
Speaker 9: encourage negative things. The opposite is true for every other group,
Speaker 9: and these are the guidelines within which all related discussions
Speaker 9: are currently carried out. The same holds true for all
Speaker 9: relevant publications and even all research and analysis, because these
Speaker 9: are all, at the end of the day, controlled by money.
Speaker 9: If we start out with the foundational premise that there
Speaker 9: are no differences between peoples in any innate, ability or
Speaker 9: skill set, this means any piece of the historical record
Speaker 9: that seems to highlight these differences must be misinformed or
Speaker 9: a product of racism, and must be reinterpreted accordingly to
Speaker 9: allow for a more just and equitable narrative. Additionally, those
Speaker 9: best suited to this new religion and its morality, meaning
Speaker 9: those most quote anti racist end quote in their outlust
Speaker 9: look will most swiftly rise through the ranks and their
Speaker 9: respective fields and the positions of ever greater influence and reach.
Speaker 9: In other words, no vast conspiracy was needed to completely
Speaker 9: toss out everything we knew about race and history prior
Speaker 9: to World War Two and replace it with a speculative
Speaker 9: hodgepodge of nonsense. This happened organically as useful idiots and
Speaker 9: willing tools pursued their own best interests. If you want
Speaker 9: a promotion, regurgitate Jared Diamond's offensively stupid ideas if you'd
Speaker 9: like to be fired ally yourself with a consensus opinion
Speaker 9: of practically every major thinker prior to nineteen forty five.
Speaker 7: So which is more likely?
Speaker 9: Were all of these great pre World War II thinkers
Speaker 9: from nations all across the world vicious racists driven by
Speaker 9: hatred who simply wanted to feel better about themselves, causing
Speaker 9: them to pin book after book of misinformation, or is
Speaker 9: our current politically correct atmosphere preventing honest discussion on controversial topics.
Speaker 9: The answer to this question is obvious and yet most
Speaker 9: of us have no idea of just how bad things
Speaker 9: have become on this front. Nationalists and places like India
Speaker 9: and Egypt, to give just two examples of many, have
Speaker 9: taken over their own academic fields with help of the
Speaker 9: usual subversives, and are largely promoted on the basis of
Speaker 9: just how effectively they're able to dismiss the contributions of
Speaker 9: the Indo European element and attribute all formal greatness of
Speaker 9: their regions to themselves. Various organizations have been created to
Speaker 9: lock down important sites and control archaeological research and the
Speaker 9: processing of all artifacts. Back in America, the Smithsonian has
Speaker 9: a nasty habit of misplacing countless artifacts that don't cleanly
Speaker 9: fit the conventional model of history, never to be seen again,
Speaker 9: and the youth are taught that it's practically heroic to
Speaker 9: tear down statues of white historical figures of old. In Sweden,
Speaker 9: the new Minister for Culture of African descent has ordered
Speaker 9: Viking artifacts to be melted down and recycled. On every front,
Speaker 9: from every angle, history is being destroyed and rewritten. This
Speaker 9: has been maddening to watch, and I've not even scratched
Speaker 9: the surface with what I just laid out. It's clear
Speaker 9: to me why this is happening. Since I began the
Speaker 9: process of immersion in the most trustworthy historical records I've
Speaker 9: been able to find. Over the years, I kept coming
Speaker 9: back to the thought that a truly honest and objective
Speaker 9: historical account, if written in our age, would appear as
Speaker 9: the single most racist book ever authored, assuming one defines
Speaker 9: the word racist to be orring to a belief in
Speaker 9: differences in ability or achievement as opposed to racial hatred.
Speaker 9: The same forces that so effectively hijacked academia post World
Speaker 9: War Two did so to impose a new worldview, a
Speaker 9: new framework. One could even call it a religion, And
Speaker 9: nothing threatens this construct more than hard historical truth. These
Speaker 9: topics are so subverted, so deeply muddied and confused, that
Speaker 9: to find our way out of this mess, we need
Speaker 9: to engage in efficient detective work and only present those
Speaker 9: ideas and concepts we're most confident in to improve the
Speaker 9: signal to noise ratio. So my first goal is to
Speaker 9: provide the broad strokes and then work to fill in
Speaker 9: the finer points. Over time, I feel like I know
Speaker 9: much more than I'm voicing, just yet, and I expect
Speaker 9: this will be the first in a series of videos
Speaker 9: on the topic, but always I'll be striving to only
Speaker 9: speak where I have a great deal of confidence. We
Speaker 9: live in an age of information overload, and we desperately
Speaker 9: need quality, not quantity. So here's my attempt to that
Speaker 9: those currently dominating the historical narrative are isolationists as opposed
Speaker 9: to diffusionists in their perspective, meaning they believe most nations
Speaker 9: and cultures, especially those separated by large bodies of water,
Speaker 9: who have been incapable of contact and interchange with one another.
Speaker 9: This foundational premise has helped to sabotage our understanding of
Speaker 9: our past and is provably false. We find traces of
Speaker 9: tobacco and cocaine and cannabis, and the fair haired mummies
Speaker 9: of the Pharaohs and Scipions, materials that would have been
Speaker 9: impossible to come by without overseas connections. We find similar
Speaker 9: architecture in these supposedly completely disconnected civilizations, such as pyramids
Speaker 9: and mound graves. We find numerous stories, especially in South America,
Speaker 9: of bearded and fair skinned men coming across the water
Speaker 9: to bestow knowledge and civilizational gifts. And we find the
Speaker 9: swastika everywhere, the symbol sacred to the Indo Europeans and
Speaker 9: used more prominently than any other. It's now fallen victim
Speaker 9: to our politically correct rewrite of world history, and, like
Speaker 9: so many similar things, can't be discussed with intellectual honesty
Speaker 9: any longer. Earliest depictions stretch back to at least four
Speaker 9: thousand BC and seem to be a hallmark of a
Speaker 9: relatively singular people and culture, with traces left on every
Speaker 9: continent as a testament to their reach. This isolationist perspective
Speaker 9: was one of the forks in the road where our
Speaker 9: understanding of the past started to go so far astray.
Speaker 9: It's difficult to overstate just how interconnected history indication that
Speaker 9: nations and empires actually were from the dawn of the
Speaker 9: historical record in approximately three thousand BC onward. Viewing Egypt
Speaker 9: and sumer and Ancient India and Greece and Persia as
Speaker 9: completely unique and separate entities supposedly emerging completely independently with
Speaker 9: virtually no genetic or a cultural or trade connections has
Speaker 9: caused us to build our picture of history on a
Speaker 9: foundation of sand, destined to never quite add up or
Speaker 9: make sense. Our collective understanding of history is now so
Speaker 9: poor that many believe things like the Germanic peoples having
Speaker 9: just sort of milled around in the forests from millennia,
Speaker 9: that the Vikings were savages, and that the Italic and
Speaker 9: Celtic and Germanic peoples are not only fundamentally separate and
Speaker 9: distinct from one another, but have a little connection to
Speaker 9: the mounted aryan element that roamed and subjugated large swaths
Speaker 9: of the Middle East as steps, and moved down into
Speaker 9: Greece and India and into East Asia. These were all
Speaker 9: actions of a single, larger family, and we fail to
Speaker 9: recognize this at our own peril, becoming prey to divide
Speaker 9: and conquered nonsense, costly infighting between brothers and cousins. Thor
Speaker 9: Hired Doll is an example of a man who refused
Speaker 9: to do anything but follow the evidence wherever it led,
Speaker 9: undaunted by those critics taught to search only for evidence
Speaker 9: supporting conventional theories.
Speaker 1: Okay, so I misspoke. It's thor Hired Doll, I said,
Speaker 1: Lord my Bed.
Speaker 13: I think that.
Speaker 11: From personal experience, and I have a good deal of
Speaker 11: experience when it comes to traveling on the ocean with
Speaker 11: framing the crowd. We do a tremendous area error by
Speaker 11: closing your eyes to the fact that there is no
Speaker 11: distance from Africa to America, no distance from America to Polynesia.
Speaker 11: If you travel the created way, and in the Indian Ocean,
Speaker 11: you can travel one way past the year, the other
Speaker 11: way the old host the year.
Speaker 13: So there too, we didn't under time. Yes, through the
Speaker 13: time man had a boat that would floats. The ocean
Speaker 13: is a convenor and of.
Speaker 15: The nice exactly what I point in my books. Oceans
Speaker 15: are are highways, not barriers to travel. And the easiest
Speaker 15: way to get from one corner to another is not
Speaker 15: to walk. You know, all over the way got in.
Speaker 13: Barriers are the deserts, and.
Speaker 15: The generals, and the montains, and the and the hostile
Speaker 15: tribes that you went to.
Speaker 9: The credentialed quote experts end quote in the field continued
Speaker 9: to insist to travel across large bodies of water before
Speaker 9: relatively recent times was an impossibility, despite the massive evidence
Speaker 9: indicating otherwise. Being the epitome of a courageous Norseman, he
Speaker 9: finally grew tired of the armchair speculators claiming crossing from
Speaker 9: South Africa to Polynesia couldn't be done, and with five
Speaker 9: fellow Norsemen as crew, they simply built a raft using
Speaker 9: indigenous materials and methods of the Asian era, and set.
Speaker 7: Off the expedition.
Speaker 12: Secretary gered Bold was given a bouquet of sunflowers as
Speaker 12: a reminder that Kontiki was the name of the sun
Speaker 12: god in the ancient Incelligens. According to Peruvian tradition, a
Speaker 12: nation with a white king was said to have ruled
Speaker 12: the land before the Incas took over. His head is
Speaker 12: hewn in prehistoric stone statues high up in the Andes.
Speaker 12: One of these provided a model for the head on
Speaker 12: our sale the last.
Speaker 1: Week, they said before the Incas took over. And I
Speaker 1: think it's interesting that in the ORLANDA Book, one of
Speaker 1: the people who set sail and who was never to
Speaker 1: be spoken of again in the ORLANDA Book because they
Speaker 1: never they never met back up again, he never returned,
Speaker 1: was a man named Inca. And if he went there
Speaker 1: and the Incas took over, then that would be from
Speaker 1: the Frisians that came in later. That's that's pretty interesting
Speaker 1: if if that's even if that happened.
Speaker 12: Here of Kontiqui in these ancient legends is that he
Speaker 12: was banished from Peru and disappeared with his people across
Speaker 12: the Pacific in the Polynesian Islands too.
Speaker 11: People.
Speaker 1: So maybe Inca banished the other people, and uh, I
Speaker 1: wonder if that's why you have the return of that
Speaker 1: skinning weirdness and human sacrifice and ripping out the heart
Speaker 1: and all that stuff came back into their culture. Maybe
Speaker 1: after the deterioration of Inca's rule they went, they reverted
Speaker 1: back to their older ways prior to Inca setting setting foot.
Speaker 12: Maybe maybe speak of the great Tiki who brought their
Speaker 12: ancestors to the islands. We were now going to follow
Speaker 12: in his footsteps. On April twenty eighth, nineteen forty seven,
Speaker 12: the Pelicans, for the first time for hundreds of years,
Speaker 12: were startled at the site of a balsa raft heading
Speaker 12: for the open sea.
Speaker 9: And one hundred and one days later arrived at their
Speaker 9: destination safe and sound, having crossed an entire ocean. We
Speaker 9: also have evidence of tobacco and cocaine, and the red
Speaker 9: and blonde haired mummies of the pharaohs discovered over recent decades,
Speaker 9: materials that wouldn't have been available without long distance trade networks.
Speaker 9: Though status quo academics circled the wagons and loudly proclaimed
Speaker 9: the tests to be mistakes or outright frauds, and after
Speaker 9: completely destroying the career of the poor woman who made
Speaker 9: the initial discoveries, the results have since been confirmed and reconfirmed.
Speaker 9: In North America, there were countless stories of American colonists
Speaker 9: unearthing bodies of a Caucasoid skull shape, many extremely tall
Speaker 9: and several having natural red hair.
Speaker 7: Were many intact.
Speaker 9: Despite hundreds of pictures, journal entries, and newspaper articles, little
Speaker 9: evidence exists today, as the vast majority of these finds
Speaker 9: were shipped to the Smithsonian, who managed to quote misplates
Speaker 9: or loose track of them. In South America we have
Speaker 9: the cloud people of the Chachipoeus culture, as well as
Speaker 9: the Paracas skull finds, both of which show fair hair
Speaker 9: of a thinner type than the Native Americans and an
Speaker 9: obviously Caucasoid skull shape. In fact, the Parakas skulls have
Speaker 9: since become famous everywhere, but academic circles who avoid them
Speaker 9: like the plague due to their elongated shape. Conventional academics
Speaker 9: attempted to claim this was a result of headbinding, seems
Speaker 9: to be their go to excuse in such cases, but
Speaker 9: this is obviously false. Not only do they lack what's
Speaker 9: called a parietal suture and have a much bigger form
Speaker 9: in magnum than traditional skulls, but binding can only alter
Speaker 9: the shape of a skull. It can't increase the size
Speaker 9: and internal volume, not to mention it leaves several telltale signs.
Speaker 9: Genetic testing also has linked them to hapla groups found
Speaker 9: in Europe today. And interestingly, these same academics that so
Speaker 9: brazenly attempt to claim all elongated skulls are the result
Speaker 9: of binding rarely give an opinion on why any people
Speaker 9: would engage in this behavior in the first place, as
Speaker 9: we know some natives did in South America. Might the
Speaker 9: simplest explanation be the correct one, and that they did
Speaker 9: so for the same reasons many wealthy ancient Greeks and
Speaker 9: many modern Europeans and Americans of just a few hundred
Speaker 9: years ago would apply cosmetics to make their skin appear
Speaker 9: more white or for the same reason, many di either
Speaker 9: hair blonde or where colored contacts. For the same reason,
Speaker 9: cosmetic surgery to produce a rounder eye shape is so
Speaker 9: popular across Asia today. Cosmetic changes of almost any type
Speaker 9: are usually done to emulate our ideal of the moment.
Speaker 9: The only frame through which headbinding makes sense to me
Speaker 9: is if it were to emulate this ruling caste with
Speaker 9: a different skull shape to the native population. A conquistador
Speaker 9: named Siesa de Leone remarked that among the indigenous Peruvians,
Speaker 9: the Chachapoyas were unusually fair skinned and famously beautiful. Quote
Speaker 9: they are the widest and most handsome of all the
Speaker 9: people that I have seen in the Indies, and their
Speaker 9: wives were of unrivaled beauty end quote. The Chachapoyas were
Speaker 9: buried and Sarcophaga is sculpted with obvious European features which
Speaker 9: bear an intriguing resemblance to those of another location with
Speaker 9: legends of a fair skinned people in ancient times, Easter Island.
Speaker 9: For further evidence that true history is not how it's
Speaker 9: being currently portrayed, I introduce you to the Asburg Buddha
Speaker 9: found in Sweden, determined to have been placed in a
Speaker 9: Viking burial around eight point thirty AD. Interestingly, this item
Speaker 9: wasn't imported, but rather created locally, So might Buddhism and
Speaker 9: the Buddha himself be traced to Indo European peoples. The
Speaker 9: answer is a resounding yes, and this is yet another
Speaker 9: topic worthy of its own video someday. Here we have
Speaker 9: the first visual depiction of the Buddha ever discovered. Look
Speaker 9: closely at the facial features, the clothing and hairstyles, and
Speaker 9: the artistic style itself.
Speaker 16: The drate clothing on the lower body and the upper body.
Speaker 17: He has his hair up in a topknot and he's
Speaker 17: also carried a small water put in his hand. Then
Speaker 17: on the other side you have Indra and he's dressed
Speaker 17: in the clothing of a prince. He's wearing a turban.
Speaker 17: He has his straight clothing on again, and he has armbands, bracelets,
Speaker 17: and he is praying to the Buddha.
Speaker 16: There it's really not clear who this figure is. It's
Speaker 16: generally assumed that he's a Bodysatfa and possibly Matreya, which
Speaker 16: is the Bodysata of the future. But who knows, one
Speaker 16: day we might be able to identify him.
Speaker 7: It's just kidding.
Speaker 9: To quote one of my favorite creators in our community.
Speaker 9: Very into European. The Buddha was from the Shakya clan
Speaker 9: also called the Sakya or Sakai, which most intellectually honest
Speaker 9: scholars tied to the linguistic root from which Scithion and
Speaker 9: ultimately Saxon is derived. Even before the time of the
Speaker 9: boot and Endo, European people we now call the Takharians
Speaker 9: had pushed all the way to China, at minimum, leaving
Speaker 9: traces and mummified remains in the Terum Basin, among other
Speaker 9: locations which China doesn't allow outsiders to explore, just as
Speaker 9: they deny the existence of what seems to be ancient
Speaker 9: pyramidal structures and have planted trees over them and attempts
Speaker 9: to hide their outlines. These mummies were found with tartan
Speaker 9: print clothing, similar to the type you might find in Scotland.
Speaker 9: A specialist in ancient DNA, Victor Meyer, states, quote. The
Speaker 9: new finds are also forcing a re examination of the
Speaker 9: old Chinese books that describe historical or legendary figures of
Speaker 9: great height with deep set blue or green eyes, long noses,
Speaker 9: full beards, and red or blonde hair. Scholars have traditionally
Speaker 9: scoffed at these accounts, but it now seems they may
Speaker 9: be accurate.
Speaker 7: End quote.
Speaker 9: Ginghis Khan and his successor sons were also spoken of
Speaker 9: as having red hair and blue or gray eyes. According
Speaker 9: to the Persian historian abul Ghasi, the tribal clan to
Speaker 9: which Timujin belonged were known as the Borchikum, or the
Speaker 9: gray eyed men. There's growing evidence that an Indo European
Speaker 9: element may have even pushed into Japan and the Koreas,
Speaker 9: inspiring Bushido culture. This subsumed genetic remnant may explain the
Speaker 9: differences in facial features between the classes that still exist
Speaker 9: in these nations today, including the increased prevalence of thick beards,
Speaker 9: narrow bridged noses, and fairer skin amongst the Daimo class
Speaker 9: in Japan. The Aryan invaders that swept into India in
Speaker 9: earnest and approximately fifteen hundred to seventeen hundred BC and
Speaker 9: established that hallmark Indo European tradition of the caste system,
Speaker 9: worshiped Indra as their highest god, whom historians long thought
Speaker 9: to be equivalent to the Norse. The rig Veda, one
Speaker 9: of the earliest written documents in the world, repeatedly refers
Speaker 9: to Indra's yellow hair and beard, and speaks of him
Speaker 9: fighting what are called the dark and swarthy adversaries to
Speaker 9: force them to bow to law and order, and quote
Speaker 9: preserve the Aryan color, among the several other passages that'd
Speaker 9: be deemed so racist in the modern atmosphere that this
Speaker 9: video might be removed if I quoted in verbata. As
Speaker 9: India began its decline, the Bagavad Gita was pinned stating
Speaker 9: out of the corruption of women precedes the confusion of casts.
Speaker 9: Out of the confusion of casts precedes the loss of memory.
Speaker 9: Out of the loss of memory precedes the loss of understanding.
Speaker 9: And out of this all evil, King Darius of the
Speaker 9: Acumenid ruling family in Persia went out of his way
Speaker 9: to claim to be an Aryan of the Aryan race.
Speaker 9: And like the surrounding Thracians, Scithian Samerians and others, most
Speaker 9: of whom would later migrate northwest into Europe, these were
Speaker 9: Aryan peoples of the Indo European cultural and linguistic root.
Speaker 9: So where was the home base of this lineage is
Speaker 9: the all important question asked by so many over the
Speaker 9: past several decades. I do have some theories on this front.
Speaker 9: There is I hope to share as soon as I'm
Speaker 9: able to be more indefinitive, but I'd like to share
Speaker 9: an equally important theory, a key or meta level understanding
Speaker 9: that causes so much of history to begin to make sense.
Speaker 9: Two related truths I've encountered time and time and time
Speaker 9: again in my research. The first is that there seems
Speaker 9: to be an obvious tradition in Indo European cultures of
Speaker 9: sending off the fittest portion of the surplus population to
Speaker 9: settle or conquer new lands, as hinted at in the
Speaker 9: opening stanzas of Kipling's White Man's Burden. I believe it's
Speaker 9: exactly this tradition which seems to be a mainstay of
Speaker 9: nearly all Western peoples throughout recorded history, which has caused
Speaker 9: the radiating outwards of the linguistic, cultural, and genetic element
Speaker 9: to the furthest lands and shores. They often brought horses, chariots,
Speaker 9: swastikas or sun wheels, the caste system, and similar religious
Speaker 9: pantheons and cultural traditions in their wake. In every case
Speaker 9: they seem to have formed the ruling or governing class.
Speaker 9: The second key truth is the gradual and inevitable mixing
Speaker 9: of peoples in these nations over time, especially as the
Speaker 9: firmly defined caste system was relaxed or broken down completely.
Speaker 9: These two factors, when considered in concert, provide the only
Speaker 9: sensible lens through.
Speaker 1: Which history I want to read this. The Heracleopolitan king
Speaker 1: explained to his son that it would civil war within
Speaker 1: Egypt that permitted these foreigners to enter the land, and
Speaker 1: advised stronger protection against them. The prophet Neferoho declared that
Speaker 1: the lack of security permitted the Asiatic entry. Foes have
Speaker 1: arisen in the East, and the Asiatics have come down
Speaker 1: into Egypt. No protector will listen. The wild beasts of
Speaker 1: the desert will drink all the rivers of Egypt and
Speaker 1: be at their ease on their banks for lack of
Speaker 1: someone to scarce them away, scare them away. The prophet
Speaker 1: in power stated the case in a way characteristically Egyptian,
Speaker 1: in their feeling of special election and special providence. The
Speaker 1: Egyptians called themselves the people in contract in contrast, I
Speaker 1: think is what I was supposed to say, in contrast
Speaker 1: to foreigners. Now, the presence of foreigners in Egypt had
Speaker 1: blurred the distinction between the people and all outsiders. Why really,
Speaker 1: the desert spread throughout the land, The gnomes are sorry,
Speaker 1: the gnomes are destroyed. Barbarians from outside have come to Egypt.
Speaker 1: There are really no people anywhere. A man of character
Speaker 1: goes goes in mourning because of what he had. A
Speaker 1: man of character goes in mourning because of what has
Speaker 1: happened in the land. Foreigners have become people everywhere. The
Speaker 1: culture of ancient Egypt, foreigners, outsiders, who do you think
Speaker 1: they're talking about?
Speaker 9: Street suddenly springs to life and makes comprehensible sense. The
Speaker 9: mental gymnastics modern academics engage in to try to paint
Speaker 9: each empire and people as entirely distinct and separate is
Speaker 9: extremely misleading.
Speaker 15: Well, it seems that most scientists it's like the status quo,
Speaker 15: and nobody wants to rewrite the history books. Know what
Speaker 15: I mean, and the way they are taught by their
Speaker 15: professors in this lineage, it's difficult for him to somehow
Speaker 15: change and embrace your theories.
Speaker 11: There's one great problem with local science, which seems to
Speaker 11: be diminished, but it has.
Speaker 13: The stabilized work for how a SHM center, and that
Speaker 13: is that they this card all evidence one by one
Speaker 13: as long as.
Speaker 11: There is no solid one by one, and in that way,
Speaker 11: they are very often, I think, throw the baby out
Speaker 11: with the worsh water, instead of considering the possibility that
Speaker 11: when you have these many evidences, is it possible that.
Speaker 7: It is a coincidence or is it not?
Speaker 9: Had long followed several alternative historians and researchers and archaeologists,
Speaker 9: such as Graham Hancock or Brian Forrester, for example, and
Speaker 9: many do great work, but failing to grasp the extent
Speaker 9: of the subversion of academia causes them to try hard
Speaker 9: to force fit their discoveries into flawed models of the past.
Speaker 9: And it's important to mention the point of this video
Speaker 9: isn't to proclaim the greatness of Indo European peoples or
Speaker 9: illustrate their history of achievement, and it's certainly not to
Speaker 9: put down other groups or insult them or cause them
Speaker 9: to feel inferior. The goal here is to attempt to
Speaker 9: piece together an accurate and honest portrait of history.
Speaker 1: They're not inferior. They're just better at not ruling. They're
Speaker 1: just better at not trying to conceive of justice that
Speaker 1: that's reserved for other people who have the morals and
Speaker 1: ethics to do so.
Speaker 9: In an age in which misinformation is completely subverting and
Speaker 9: rewriting the record because this truth matters, and I happen
Speaker 9: to believe it matters immensely more so now than ever.
Speaker 9: And it's difficult to imagine a greater crime than the
Speaker 9: wholesale rewriting of history. And I want to leave you
Speaker 9: all with this, and I hope you take it to heart,
Speaker 9: as it's difficult to overemphasize its importance. Authoring and honest
Speaker 9: and accurate history is now a responsibility that falls squarely
Speaker 9: on our shoulders. And please understand what I'm saying here,
Speaker 9: This really is on us. Modern science and academia filters
Speaker 9: all historical understanding through a prism of political correctness, stemming
Speaker 9: from this new cult of diversity and tolerance and globalism,
Speaker 9: which virtually every last one of them now belonged to.
Speaker 9: And those that don't, well, they're dominated or marginalized by
Speaker 9: those that do. Moneyed interests finance every archaeological, dig genetic study,
Speaker 9: every major analysis and research paper on relevant topics. The
Speaker 9: universities that give grant money for such things only do
Speaker 9: so when and where the conclusions fit into our present
Speaker 9: cultural whims. This precludes even the possibility of honest historical
Speaker 9: research and discussion. As we speak historical truth as being
Speaker 9: buried and obfuscated, mischaracterized, and misrepresented.
Speaker 7: Here is the Large Buddha.
Speaker 14: The Large Buddha is one hundred and seventy five feet high,
Speaker 14: probably the biggest in all of the world. And here's
Speaker 14: what remains of it. The face was cut away many
Speaker 14: centuries ago when the Moslims took over this area. But
Speaker 14: there are Hobland David at the bottom there to give
Speaker 14: you an idea.
Speaker 1: Of side Muslims defacing history and usually working in conjunction
Speaker 1: with the base religion to theirs. If you follow up,
Speaker 1: meaning here with the Abrahamic stuff, they are the destroyers
Speaker 1: of history. Same thing happened in Palmyra with quote unquote
Speaker 1: isis when they destroyed bomb blew up all the ruins there.
Speaker 14: And you're looking up one hundred and seventy five feet
Speaker 14: and above its head, above the head of this statue,
Speaker 14: we could see very unusual paintings, so we were told
Speaker 14: it might be possible to go up there and see
Speaker 14: the paintings at close range.
Speaker 13: We see the red beard.
Speaker 7: And red hair.
Speaker 1: It's a shame that these figures have all been defaced
Speaker 1: by people of other faiths at sometime in the past,
Speaker 1: but it's still it's very easy to.
Speaker 11: See what they looked like, and we can tell who
Speaker 11: they were.
Speaker 7: He's got the red bear red hair parted in the middle.
Speaker 7: The statues that you've seen.
Speaker 14: The caves are fifteen hundred or more years old, and
Speaker 14: this is a secret way to get to the top
Speaker 14: of the Buddha that they only recently discovered. The regular
Speaker 14: way to go up there was long since destroyed, but
Speaker 14: they're able to get in sort of a back way. Well,
Speaker 14: we climb down again, all the way down this way
Speaker 14: and had one last look at that magnificent big Buddha
Speaker 14: one hundred and seventy five feet high, carved in these
Speaker 14: plus fifteen hundred years ago.
Speaker 9: And a great deal of it is being literally disappeared
Speaker 9: as artifacts challenging the worldview they seek to impose on us.
Speaker 9: All are either mysteriously misplaced or are destroyed. For those
Speaker 9: with time and interest, I'm asking you to join the
Speaker 9: fight here, explore research, seek to put the pieces together.
Speaker 9: I believe our time window is closing, and that time
Speaker 9: is at the essence. Technology is a double edged sword
Speaker 9: here and can allow for the more efficient uncovering and
Speaker 9: understanding of our past, or the more efficient burying and
Speaker 9: upfuse skating. Countless websites and videos I'd saved in my
Speaker 9: notes through these years on these topics are no longer accessible.
Speaker 9: Several of the most important older books on these topics
Speaker 9: are now out of print and can cost several hundred
Speaker 9: dollars on Amazon. The past is disappearing, and the quote
Speaker 9: history end quote they're offering up in its place is
Speaker 9: largely an invention out of whole cloth. It's fraudulent and aggressively.
Speaker 9: So again, history is informative on the deepest levels. It
Speaker 9: informs us of who we were, who we are, and
Speaker 9: who we might someday be. The memory of all those
Speaker 9: who came before us needs to be honored and preserved.
Speaker 9: A tree can't survive without its roots. The best chart
Speaker 9: our future. We must first understand our past.
Speaker 3: Let's get to.
Speaker 1: Work, all right, We've been on long enough. I am
Speaker 1: going to call it here and I will be on
Speaker 1: the road tomorrow. I'm going to be driving, well, i'll
Speaker 1: be riding, but be going across the desert to Phoenix.
Speaker 1: A report. If anybody out there is in the business
Speaker 1: of I don't know, meditating, throwing, the energy in a
Speaker 1: positive direction or doing one of the these things. Pray
Speaker 1: for safe travels please. Me and my daughter could be
Speaker 1: on total four planes, two there or two back ten
Speaker 1: days later. So it'd be nice if the plane did
Speaker 1: what it's supposed to do when it's supposed to do it,
Speaker 1: and nothing otherwise. Otherwise, you guys will have to take
Speaker 1: this up because it has to be done. Good Night,