Speaker 1: Moved on to Chicago. Would you be do you have
an open would you be so kind to take us
through their offseason?
Speaker 2: Vitals?
Speaker 3: Sure?
Speaker 4: They have got about twenty eight million dollars in cap space.
That puts them about sixty four million below the Tacks
seventy two point six million below the first Apron.
Speaker 3: All this is via a fourteen player projection.
Speaker 4: That includes Caleb Wilson, Dalen Swain, Leonard Miller's team option,
and Cam Jones. Does not include free agent holds Franferony Simons,
Colin Sexton or Zach Is that Zach Collins?
Speaker 3: Yeah, Zach Collins.
Speaker 4: They are hard capped at the first Apron because of
the Nick Claxton trade, which I guess could still just
continue to expand who knows. At this point, they'll have
the nine point one million dollar room exception. They've got
a a TPE worth eighteen million dollars from the Kevin
Herder deal. The usban Jang TPE is worth six point
seven million. They got to renounce both of those for
cap space if they want to play that game. Notable
free agents Zach Collins, Nick Richards, Colin Sexton, Simons, Grishaon Yabusele,
Those guys are all unrestrict did Yuki Kawamura, Mac McClung,
Lachlan Olbrick are restricted. They've got team options on Leonard
Miller for two point four million and Mohammadu Gay at
two point four million as well. Simons and Sexton are
both eligible for extensions. Three years and one hundred and
four million would be Simons, Max Sexton's would be three
years and seventy two million. Nick Richard, Zach Collins, Leonder
Miller all also eligible for extensions, as is Isaac kccorro.
First round pick situation, they got all their own firsts
going forward, they can trade up to four of them.
Those would be in the odd years coming up. So
twenty seven, twenty nine, thirty one, thirty three highest paid
players Josh Giddy at twenty five million dollars, which is
that's I mean, how there cannot be many more teams
that have their highest paid player making twenty five or less.
Nick Claxton twenty three million, Patrick Williams eighteen, isaacccoro just
under twelve, Kale Wilson just under eleven. That's that's wild too.
Their first their most recent first round pick, or highest
recent first round pick is their fifth highest paid player. Yeah,
so some of the cap space they had has gone
to Claxton I suppose is one way to think of it.
And they are kind of starting over under bryceon Graham.
Now Thiego Splitter is the new head coach. This is
a pretty much ground up rebuild at this point. So
what do you start with, like I guess, and how
long is this going to take? And and like where
do they go from here? As they they really they
finally did it right, So that's great. We're happy for
this is a fresh start. What's like move number one,
what's the direction, what's the what's the overall plan here? Now?
Speaker 1: I I'm I think it's they're just an asset accumulation
mode where you could hope that Caleb Wilson or maybe
modest Bouzellis is your primary building block. But it's TBD
for sure. On kayleb Wilson, we have he was a
top four pick. He was one of those in the
draft where it thought, oh there's four cornerstones and he
was number four. But you need to see it on
the court and what does he turned into offensively? I
am curious. One of the things I'm asking first as
this team is Who's I don't want to say is
who's untouchable, but it's is modest Buzzellis, Does Bryson Graham
view him as a building block? Does he view jobs
like those are two names that, no, you don't have
to make a decision on, but for the team that
you're building, are those players that you view as these
are long term fits for us? And I always find
it interesting because what's not mentioned probably enough about the
maybe they'll melow ball thing as Charlotte is he was
never that front office's draft pick. And so you come
in with these new regimes, and even if these players
are there for a while, you don't necessarily know how
they truly feel until these guys maybe are starting to
get paid. And with Motus Buzzellis, he's gonna go in
a year three, He's going to be extension eligible after
next season. And so I think that that's a conversation Internally,
you're probably having to say, Okay, what is is anything
here bolted down? Aside from I think you start Caleb
Wilson untouchable, who else is bolted down into this core?
Speaker 3: Nobody?
Speaker 4: I think I don't feel like you you would have
to say that the environment did not really give anybody
an opportunity to to prove like, well, I look like
a winning player on a team that's relevant like Bozelle's
probably comes closest to that, but I would I would
argue that still his biggest, like the biggest point in
his favor is the mystery box thing, like nobody's really
sure what his what he's going to be or or
if he's like anything more than a high energy role
player that's like maybe a decent starter, Like that's still
like a low end possibility.
Speaker 3: So yeah, no, you don't.
Speaker 4: You don't get to be like Josh Giddy is beyond
like like just the untouchable.
Speaker 3: That's ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Like if you would trade him in a heartbeat, if
you could get a pick or two or like a
couple of rookie scale salaries. I think so to me,
it's an easy answer, like, yeah, you're gonna what Caleb
Wilson can do. Literally everybody else is like, well what
do you give me for him?
Speaker 3: Right? It has to be that And.
Speaker 2: A correction that was a mistake on my end.
Speaker 1: They're not hard capped at the first apart because I
forgot they took Nick Claxton into cap space that you
were talking about, so even more flexible?
Speaker 2: Would you could you move? Like, wouldn't there be a.
Speaker 1: Market for Josh Gutty if you said we want to
move him?
Speaker 4: I think I don't think he's a negative value contract,
which I would have been surprised by.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 4: I'm sure I was critical enough of it when they
signed it to There's probably something out there of me
suggesting it might be a negative value contract at some point.
Speaker 3: Twenty five million.
Speaker 1: Stick the sticker price still get you a little bit,
right when you take it percentages of the cap it
makes sense.
Speaker 2: But then it's all hundred million dollars for Josh Guiney.
Speaker 4: I mean twenty five million dollars is like a low
end low end. It is like not a not a
great starter salary, right anymore, So, if you think Josh
Getty can be your fifth best fourth or fifth best starter,
he's probably worth that. He's still not even twenty four like,
So I think I think he's a positive value player.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 4: More like whatever is slightly more than marginally? So yeah,
I do you agree with that? Like's not he's not
neutral value? Is he's better than that?
Speaker 1: I would guess, but who's giving you I struggle to
find the fit for Josh Getty. I suppose is who's
giving you something for for Josh Getty?
Speaker 2: Would he make sense? Is the second guy next to
Caden Detroit?
Speaker 4: That's interesting. The defensive infrastructure is probably still good enough
to accommodate him if the shooting's real, if you can
just make the spot up stuff. He's not like breaking
the defense down so much, which is still I think
what we kind of think Detroit needs in its secondary guy.
He's at least interesting in Detroit and would not cost
you know, like doesn't take up the salary, like he
just slots into like what Tobias Harris made last year
or not even quite that. So that's an I had.
Speaker 3: That's an interesting one.
Speaker 1: What about would Charlotte without LaMelo Ball have interest and
you have to use basically the Miles Bridges salary do
you prefer as Charlotte? They seem to be obviously they
have Kobe White and the Balls. You know we've already
seen that movie.
Speaker 4: So no, that's a bad Yeah, Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: I mean, like he's he's a tricky player.
Speaker 4: This is this is really the thing with him, is
that like he's a tricky player to build around because
he's best with the ball. He's improved his offensive value
without the ball. That there's no denying that the shooting
has has made him slightly more like, uh, scalable. And
it's not like just I guess he's he fits. He
makes sense in more places than he used to. I
still view him as someone that like there's a ceiling
on how good you can be if he's in a
really big role and he doesn't really make sense still
if he's not in a big on ball role.
Speaker 3: Do you agree with that?
Speaker 4: By the way, are we still like is that where
we still are on Josh Giddy or am i am
I anchored to like a year and a half ago?
Speaker 2: What you think he needs to be on ball?
Speaker 4: I think you get the most out of him if
he's got the ball a lot, Yeah, because there's no
defensive value and there's some off there's off ball value,
but it's still not like he's not a just he's
not out there to snipe, you know, he's.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And he's similar to Luka Danjich or Lamel Ball himself,
where his biggest defensive strength is the fact that he
is not undersized. He's a six seven guy, so it's
easier to hide him damning well.
Speaker 4: But it also means that that's a guy that, like
it limits your it limits the type of roster you
can build because he definitely can't guard smalls and so
you sort of have to put him on like a
bigger guy, and so then you still need another guard
so you're a little small.
Speaker 3: Like It's just I don't know, this is all.
Speaker 4: This is all in the book of Josh Giddy that
we've been writing for years, like that, this is not
new information. I like him more than I used to,
but again I don't think the bulls The only argument
for the bulls like really viewing him as as difficult
to acquire is that he does kind.
Speaker 3: Of make other players' lives a little easier.
Speaker 4: And you just added Caleb Wilson and that might be nice,
you know, and to some extent Bozellos too. Right, Like
he is he is someone that's unselfish and he does
move the ball and that might make your developmental curves
a little less painful for some of your younger guys.
Speaker 1: This if they were looking to get a little cheaper
and the guy coming back certainly fits what seems like
Bryce and Graham is trying to build with Thiago Splitter
in Chicago, Josh Giddy for Jalen Suggs could do Josh
Giddy and Isaaca Korro too would put like the money
would basically work there.
Speaker 4: I believe that's pretty interesting. That's pretty interesting boy that.
I mean Orlando's so big, which which is a good thing. Well,
I mean they just have two like power forward sized
guys and they have two.
Speaker 3: Like bigger guards.
Speaker 4: You'd really be counting on Giddey's off ball value as
an offensive player because you still you want to be
running everything. Yeah, that's interesting. I mean he's been more
durable than Suggs. There's that what most most guys have.
Speaker 1: Uh, that's it on getting I would I'm curious to
see what happens with Modest Buzzellis in Chicago. I think
his offensive role next season will maybe say because I
don't expect them to move him unless they're trying to
acquire someone different. I think his offensive role will inform
a lot about how this regime feels about him moving forward.
I did want to ask you, you are the Bulls.
Speaker 2: What's the you have?
Speaker 1: Modest Buzzellis and Caleb Bowls and what's the best way
to build around them right now? Like what is the
prototypical This gets into what did they what do they need?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: They have a center Nicholas Claxton, But do you need
a different type of center? Do you want to see
Caleb Wilson playoff at center?
Speaker 2: A little bit?
Speaker 1: Like, what is the ideal you're fleshing out a lineup
with these two in it? What are kind of the
archetypes you want surrounding them?
Speaker 3: Josh, I was just gonna say, like, you're discraced.
Speaker 4: So what I just said, I I think someone that's gonna,
you know, get them a bucket or two that they
don't have to work very hard for.
Speaker 3: I think I think.
Speaker 4: That that is a real like value add and Getty
does provide that. I kind of like the Claxton fit
because he's pretty versatile defensively and last year.
Speaker 3: He showed the ability to.
Speaker 2: So many hated that trade.
Speaker 4: By the way, despite I think we're probably we're higher
on Claxton than most, I think the playmaking stuff. Every
time I talk about him now, I just like, did
you see what he did as as a passer last year?
Like that's I don't know how real it is, but
I'm interest in finding out as the bulls. And again
that's another guy that like, well it's a give and take, right,
do you want Bozellis and Wilson to have to like
not to the Cooper flag extent, but like really strain
on offense to see like what's there, you know, and
there's maybe some merit to that. Personally, I would rather
have enough guys around them to run a functional offense
where the ball moves and they learn how to play
without having to just like kill themselves trying to create
their own offense, which is like neither of them is
going to be good enough to do.
Speaker 3: That in a high usage role.
Speaker 4: So yeah, I think both Claxon and Giddy are pretty
sensible pieces for if you're trying to just maximize the
young guys, which has to be the goal. But like
I would also say, like because the way, I don't know,
you didn't intentionally phrase it this way, maybe, but like
build around Wilson and Bozellis, I think, how can you
know at this point, like how could you have any
idea what those guys are gonna need. There's like they
haven't been playing in a serious basketball environment for you know,
Wilson hasn't played in one at all, and Buzilli certainly
didn't over the last two years.
Speaker 2: Are you trying to say bad things about UNC? What
are you playing about UN?
Speaker 3: Just a function an NBA environment?
Speaker 2: How about that?
Speaker 3: Although what's the difference anymore?
Speaker 2: Really? Do you?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 1: I guess that infury It makes it tough to peg
down what does this roster need?
Speaker 2: But I would sit back and say you.
Speaker 1: Still kind of need a five of the future that
because I don't think that that's Caleb Wilson's role, and
they definitely need shooting, right Who is the best?
Speaker 2: Who are the best shooters? Ranked?
Speaker 1: Me?
Speaker 2: The three best shooters? I'm the post roster right now?
Speaker 3: I mean, where does Giddy rank?
Speaker 2: Is?
Speaker 3: That is?
Speaker 4: That's that's probably mean Buzille's actually Buzillis. I think there's
some promise there, Like he was around eighty percent from
three or from the free throw line, and you know,
doubled his volume and maybe maybe there's some shooting there.
Speaker 3: What did Giddy shoot? I've really overrated it.
Speaker 4: Thirty six percent from ZEP last year, but more five attempts.
He's been at thirty eight. Maybe I over sold Giddy's
off ball shooting value a little bit.
Speaker 2: Is it?
Speaker 1: No, Simon's is not on the book, Like like you
almost to me. I'm looking at this roster and think
you need to bring Anthony Simon's back?
Speaker 3: Could you do that for the mid level?
Speaker 1: You think fifteen? I mean that's what I'm trying for
what team? I guess we could look at and say, well,
which teams are good? Would if Detroit misses out on
Powell that could.
Speaker 2: Be an Athrey Simon's team.
Speaker 4: Just I want to double check this before I say it,
because it would be hilarious. Is is Patrick Williams the
best three point.
Speaker 2: Shoot from the trost? Well that.
Speaker 1: Should they extend Patrick Williams, He's extended.
Speaker 2: I got to do it.
Speaker 4: You gotta do it now before the market gets wise
to this guy. Yeah, no, you're right there there's a
there's a pretty big and again, if you're trying to
make life easier for Wilson and bozellis spacing the floor
goes a long way. Like if you're good passers in
good spacing just makes the lift a little bit lighter
for both of those guys.
Speaker 2: What's up, fella, Sako.
Speaker 1: Do you want all of our episodes ad free, then
please support the show by joining our Patreon or we
have a YouTube membership program where there are tiers that
you could choose from bonus content, discord access, merch codes
and throw our over under competition's mailbag priority. Just a
ton of stuff comes with a grant. Is giddy with
excitement at the fact I just.
Speaker 4: Know that you've promised to do a standing backflip if
enough people subscribe. So that's in addition to everything Dan
mentioned and all the other perks. You're gonna want to
sign up for that.
Speaker 2: And now back to the show.
Speaker 1: I think when you're looking at targets for this team,
the Claxton trade to me kind of informs I don't
think they're gonna go on the market, especially with often
reeves off, and they've made it clear because of the
amount of cap space they've used, they're not going to
be the Walker Tesla or Jalen Duran stocking horse. They
kind of seem, what's a contract out there that a
team doesn't.
Speaker 2: Want and you, you know what.
Speaker 1: Should there be players that they're targeting in that man
and maybe those players then end up filling the need
of oh, can we get some extra shooting?
Speaker 2: And I don't think shoot like.
Speaker 1: The contracts where shooters are like going out, They don't
if you're going to overpay someone.
Speaker 2: My point is it might as well be a shooter.
Speaker 1: But could they you know, if if Cleveland comes in
and they're looking to get out of the second Apron,
Max Druce or Sam Merril just to get some more
functional floor spacing in here. But those are also guys
where you probably it easily to give up seconds if Cleveland,
even if Cleveland's just kind of dumping them. But I
was trying to look, and we're struggling to find to
be sure, all right, what would be like the contra,
like what some of the unsavory contracts that would make
sense for Chicago to take on now rather than should
they wait and roll this into the middle of this
and see what emerges?
Speaker 2: All right?
Speaker 3: Unbalanced trade?
Speaker 4: You send Patrick Williams to the Kings, bring Zach Lavine
back after he picks up his player option.
Speaker 3: You get a pick with Levine and you just wave
and stretch him or you let him shoot for you.
There's your shooting.
Speaker 4: How mad would Zack Lavine be? He's like, I'm only
allowed to play for the Kings and the Bulls. Like,
what did I do in the past life to get
to make everyone so mad at me? No? I, As
you were talking, I was trying to think of who's
a good shooter that the Bulls could take on with
that to get assets, And it's Cam.
Speaker 1: What about Cam Johnson if Denver's looking to really cut?
Because I thought Chicago might have been an interesting Peyton
Watson or Tarry Easton's team in free agency, but I
think having Wilson and Bouzellis takes them out of that.
Speaker 2: Maybe not, but they also have Dalen Swayne now too.
Speaker 4: You can just take Johnson into cap space, right because
we've got him with enough. Uh And maybe you're I
guess you're probably giving Denver what's the to going great
for Wiggins and Joe's two seconds? Maybe you have to
give three seconds or something or like a fake first
well form.
Speaker 1: Part of the value is they're saving them twenty plus
million dollars versus Wiggins and Joe are making less than
half that.
Speaker 3: That's what I mean.
Speaker 4: It's more than either of those guys. It's it's well, oh,
I see it should it be less because you're saving
Denver more money.
Speaker 1: I would says, I certainly don't think you need to
send out more for Cam if you're saving Denver just
twenty plus million dollars off rip. I don't know that
they have the lever you need to give us five
second round picksure.
Speaker 4: But Cam Johnson's better than either of those two guys.
Speaker 2: The Bulls aren't.
Speaker 1: It'd be different if another team, if Detroit wants a
Cam Johnson or something, and that's the moves they're trying
to make for Okay, but the Bulls aren't. They're not
getting Cam Johnson to go make a playoff push. They're
getting Cam Johnson to open up the floor for their
younger guys.
Speaker 4: Well, then just pivoting here, Why aren't the Bulls a
resche or too, John Salon or Cody Williams. Why aren't
they We'll take your your failed lottery pick, Like, why
aren't they that team?
Speaker 3: Why like, give us that guy?
Speaker 1: They have enough of failed lottery equity.
Speaker 3: I mean, if they.
Speaker 2: They're gonna cut him loose. So yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 4: I'm just trying to think, like I do. They are
just at absolute zero here, So why wouldn't you be
taken on guys.
Speaker 1: Like that, Well, does Denver have enough to get like
for them to take on Christian Brown.
Speaker 2: That's really double down on these guys who could defend
and maybe move without the ball, but not the questionable jumpers.
Speaker 1: Denver can give you a like first round swaps essentially,
and I think they might have one second round pick
to trade.
Speaker 2: I'll go, I'll go double check that.
Speaker 4: But I'm just looking for who you could if there's
anything worth like sending back like it could obviously be
a super unbalanced trade because of Chicago's cap space, but
you could send out like who with Denver?
Speaker 2: Here it is it's some permutation. Well, so maybe it's
Trey Jones.
Speaker 1: They got to take on the Patrick Williams contract, but
they get off of Cam Johnson and Christian Brown.
Speaker 2: That's the baseline there might be.
Speaker 1: I don't a Chicago's cap space might not get because
so Brown and Cam Johnson are at what combined next season.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna look that up right now, we know what.
Speaker 4: You're doing both so that then that's like close to
fifty million dollars I think, right, So.
Speaker 1: The Bulls have let's just say if the Bulls are
working with twenty five they could take Christian Brown just
in to cap space or Cam Johnson into cap space
at twenty three because they make forty about forty four
point five forty four.
Speaker 4: Points Brown, Yeah, Brown's like twenty just twenty one and
a half. Okay, so we're forty five million dollars.
Speaker 1: Can you only need seventeen to make up the difference? Really,
Patrick Williams does that, so you can do Patrick Williams
for those two.
Speaker 3: I mean, Denver fans would riot, wouldn't they. There'd be like,
this is the last straw, just this is awful. You
get so much worse.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: That would be that Denver fans better hate that. That
would just be a you're trading you're not even getting
maybe a rotation player.
Speaker 2: Well you bring back Peyton Watson.
Speaker 3: So there you go, Yeah, there you go. That's true.
We had to do it.
Speaker 4: We had to do it for the to find the
money for Peyton Watson. That's always that's always the fair
of us.
Speaker 2: Veer Jones.
Speaker 4: Yeah, right, Look, you know, we just valued these guys
that much that it was worth making this move so
we could retain the place.
Speaker 1: If you're the Bulls, because you could do it without
Patrick Williams. You could send back maybe a Coro and
Trey Jones. Trey Jones would certainly help the Nuggets, but
like getting Cam Johnson isn't enough of a sweetener as
the Bulls to say we'll just take Brown's deal.
Speaker 3: Right, Probably not? Probably not?
Speaker 4: It makes he makes more sense on Chicago than Denver, right,
just because well he's young enough and he's kind of
a starter, and who knows, like it's easier to accommodate
that guy, and the Bulls have like massive flexibility. So yeah,
I just I'm I don't know. We may have gone
too far down the road of how do we get
how do we get a new fifty million dollars? Like
they would be disappointing as Chicago that like that's where
the money went, like a couple I think so like Brown, well,
here's the thing you would immediately be looking like, what
can we get for flipping Cam Johnson right and Christian Brown?
Speaker 3: I don't know that's what I would be doing.
Speaker 1: Well, but you could get value for Cam and there's
also to me there'd be value in opening up the
floor for Caleb Wilson, Nick Claxton, modest buzzellis is also
what I'm like the lens through which I'm looking at it.
But I do understand your point. If that's the fifty
million dollars, just big move there. I mean, does Dever
want some really funky stuff? Does Denver want Josh Giddy?
Speaker 4: That's no, I don't know what to say. I just
did that meme of that blonde lady.
Speaker 3: That's like, uh no, what.
Speaker 2: Do he don't have enough to get them to take
on Jovich? Right? What are you even attached to they have? Yea, yeah, they.
Speaker 1: Have a conditional Well, if you could get there, because
they're picked next year's lottery protected, it's gonna if you
bet on it, keeping like conveying, they could trade their
twenty twenty nine first round it expires immediately if it doesn't.
Speaker 2: Uh huh.
Speaker 1: But Yovich is on the books for four years and
sixty four and change.
Speaker 4: What about Portland sweetens something and you take Jeremy Grant
as the bulls? Does that do anything for you? What's
the sweetener need to be? Scoot a first round pick?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, so now we have Jeremy Grant, Caleb Wilson
down sway, modest buzzell. I mean Jeremy Grant could definitely
cannibalize offensive touches, but I don't he might actually infringe
upon what you want to do with Caleb Wilson and modest.
Speaker 4: You don't have to play them, just yeah, just give
me one of give me some of those Milwaukee assets
that Portland has. I'll take Jeremy Grant and uh he
can have backspasms for six months and just hang out.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't, but that to me feels like what
they'll end up doing with it is those aren't the
names necessarily, but it feels like they will take on
I don't know if Nick Claxton was considered unwanted money,
but they'll be maybe a trade facilitator more than they'll
be the trade aggressor here or target aggressor, because it
doesn't seem like they're looking to throw their money around
in free agency to drum up the market on anything.
Speaker 3: No doesn't doesn't.
Speaker 4: They had the opportunity to do that, and they the
Claxton move makes that. I guess they're still threats, but
they're not like you know, like you said at the
like Duran and Kessler are not like leveraging the bulls
to get bigger deals.
Speaker 1: I would still if you're not worried about like your
cap space, like letting other moves happen. I still might
take a look at Peyton Watson Atari Easton just to
mess with the books of Houston and Denver, and then
if they don't match, it's all right, Well we'll just
have like a bunch of wings that could do all
the different things on defense.
Speaker 4: Right, the low the sort of second the not for
sure like thirty plus million dollars a year guys, they
can still get in there and mess with so that
makes sense, but the top two guys probably not.
Speaker 2: Grant. We did it all.
Speaker 1: Thirty teams all got at least twenty five minutes, twenty
plus minutes or more. I am tired graphics for all
of them. Mistakes were made, takes were given, no regrets
hashtag no regrets. This is the most in depth we've
gone on that end of season series. So if you're
new or you haven't yet, maybe consider joining our Patreon,
Patreon dot com slash Hardware Knocks NBA. We do these
for the trade deadline, and we do even more in
depth with guests. For we had a lot of guest
shout out to our guests who came on to help
us with this series. Shout out to Grant, Shout out
to More, Shout out to mister Taporak for helping out
with those two. And then next up will be the
I need a break before then. I don't know about you,
but the regular season look aheads once the offseason settles down,
but we got Look, if the beginning of this offseason
is any indication we got you and I might be
recording some emergent We didn't record one for Giannis, which
is probably that's weird. I knew you were sleeping or
at least getting ready to go to bed when that
news broke, so I didn't text you. But yeah, ifs
any indication we might have an emergency podcast or two under,
I think I think there's.
Speaker 3: A good chance.
Speaker 4: I mean maybe the Jaalen depending on where he goes,
the Jalen Brown one might be might be on deck uh,
and then I don't know.
Speaker 3: Whoever, the war when the.
Speaker 4: Warriors get Lebron will probably have to do a five
pod series on what it all means for everybody's legacies.
Don't you think if you're a miss if we didn't, do.
Speaker 2: You have anything else? Or are you ready to take
us out of here.
Speaker 4: No, I think that's gonna do it. Thanks everybody, especially
those of you in the comments. Thanks for listening, Thanks
for watching rate review, subscribe, do all the things. Those
are our good comment here Kawhi and the six Sure
let's get him back there.
Speaker 3: Uh what else? Join our Patreon please, that's the best
way to suport the podcast.
Speaker 4: As then mentioned, Dan mentioned patreon dot com slash Hard
with Knocks NBA AD free content bonus episodes, one of
which we will be recording early next week.
Speaker 3: You can join our just Fun More too, hopefully. I
mean it depends on how poorly you do that that'll be.
Speaker 4: More fun because we're going to do another little blind
exercise here. I only choose on the other foot.
Speaker 3: See how you like it? Uh think dain everybody shouts
Frank Miiliquin. Apologies. Jared Allen