Speaker 1: The Stone Zone, entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network.
Speaker 2: You are now entering the stone zone. Well. Ever since
Speaker 2: Vice President Evance, speaking at the Nixon Presidential Library, said
Speaker 2: correctly that President Richard Nixon was taken down by the
Speaker 2: same insidious deep state forces that tried to take down
Speaker 2: Trump down, We've had a renewed interest in the presidency
Speaker 2: and the events surrounding Richard Nixon's takedown, but also his
Speaker 2: accomplishments as presidence. They call it Nixon Maxing, and it
Speaker 2: is really the brainchild of two brilliant young guys, James Byron,
Speaker 2: who is the chief executive officer of the Nixon Foundation,
Speaker 2: and the young marketing director there. They're using memes on Instagram, x,
Speaker 2: YouTube and so on to launch this completely new interest
Speaker 2: in our thirty seventh president. If I have anything to
Speaker 2: say about it, I guess it would be well, I
Speaker 2: told you so. It is amazing to watch. Meanwhile, President
Speaker 2: Donald Trump gave a national address to the nation last Thursday,
Speaker 2: although if you were watching network television you wouldn't have
Speaker 2: known it because CBSABC, NBC, CNN and the rest of
Speaker 2: the lame stream media refused to carry the president's remarks.
Speaker 2: I find that really odd in view of the fact
Speaker 2: that they carried Joe Biden's national address in which he
Speaker 2: basically said that anyone who disagreed with him politically was
Speaker 2: a dangerous extremist. That speech they carried, you may remember
Speaker 2: that speech was a very very dark speech. Later on
Speaker 2: in the show, Chris Jerski joins us Chris Jersky as
Speaker 2: an election integrity expert. He is the head of an
Speaker 2: organization called the People's Audit that is set up to
Speaker 2: help have honest, fair, free elections. We're going to talk
Speaker 2: about his analysis of the president's remarks. I of course
Speaker 2: expected when the President of the United States announced that
Speaker 2: two hundred million voter records from the United States had
Speaker 2: been purloined by the communist Chinese, and more importantly, there
Speaker 2: are intelligence services the FBI, the CIA, and so on
Speaker 2: had kept that information from him. I of course expected that, well,
Speaker 2: somebody would be arrested the next day. Of course, that
Speaker 2: didn't happen. We're going to talk about that later with
Speaker 2: Chris Jerski. But right now, federal authorities are investigating what
Speaker 2: the FBI describes as an anti government attack. Outside of
Speaker 2: twenty six Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan. I know that building. Well,
Speaker 2: that's where former President Richard Nixon had his office in
Speaker 2: his post presidential years. Spent many hours in that building.
Speaker 2: According to the FBI, a suspect allegedly deployed an incendiary
Speaker 2: device outside the federal building, which houses offices for the
Speaker 2: Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department better known as ICE, the
Speaker 2: Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the US Citizenship and
Speaker 2: Immigration Services, as well as the Social Security Administration. Federal
Speaker 2: agents reportedly rushed from the building with weapons drawn before
Speaker 2: the Federal Protective Service officers took a suspect into custody.
Speaker 2: Authorities identified the suspect as one Andrew Arabaca, Investigators also
Speaker 2: saying he carried aside reading ice off our streets most
Speaker 2: not wintertime. In fact, it's so hot you could find
Speaker 2: it on the sidewalk. The FBI's New York Joint Terrorism
Speaker 2: Task Force is now leading the investigation into this attack.
Speaker 2: Police reportedly recovered a firearm connected to the incident, although
Speaker 2: officials have not confirmed whether it was found on the suspect.
Speaker 2: You know, the political messaging surrounding this attack cannot be ignored.
Speaker 2: For years now, violence associated with far left causes has
Speaker 2: often been minimized as isolated unrest. Even when federal law
Speaker 2: enforcement officers were increasingly vilified by radical leftists and politicians,
Speaker 2: groups like the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center
Speaker 2: told the feds to look the other way and focus
Speaker 2: on President Trump and his supporters and others so called
Speaker 2: white supremacists. That's not me. As a result, the radical
Speaker 2: leftists threat has only misastasized. New York City Mayor Zorei
Speaker 2: ma'm Dami called the incident deeply disturbing, but his movement
Speaker 2: has played a significant role, in my view, in dividing
Speaker 2: this country and radicalizing these disturbed liberals. The anti ice
Speaker 2: organizations that were part of the coalition to elect ma'am
Speaker 2: Dami have created a dangerously hostile climate towards the men
Speaker 2: and women enforcing federal law, people who are just doing
Speaker 2: their jobs. Trump administration has warned that far left political
Speaker 2: violence must be treated as domestic terrorism, and I agree.
Speaker 2: I would argue this is probably the most president threat
Speaker 2: to the future of our nation, other than the question
Speaker 2: that we don't seem to be able to have a free,
Speaker 2: fair and honest election. But antifa must be considered somewhat
Speaker 2: like isis their enemy combatants, and I believe they must
Speaker 2: be treated as such. Meanwhile, it was great to see
Speaker 2: President Donald Trump take center stage at Sunday's FIFA World
Speaker 2: Cup Final the met Stadium right there in New Jersey,
Speaker 2: joining Mexican President Claudia Scheinbaum and Canadian Prime Minister Mark
Speaker 2: Carney as the leaders of the tournament's three host nations,
Speaker 2: watched Spain face Argentina. President Trump was seeing the long
Speaker 2: first lady at Melania Trump, who has always looked great
Speaker 2: and near FIFA President Gianna Infantino. Before kickoff, the President
Speaker 2: was showing the World Cup trophy was expected to join
Speaker 2: in Fantino in presenting it to the winning team after
Speaker 2: the match. Speaking with Fox Sports before the game, President
Speaker 2: Trump raised the tournament as beautiful and said that international
Speaker 2: visitors have been given a chance to see what a
Speaker 2: great country America is. The appearance capped another moment for
Speaker 2: a president who has made a point of showing up
Speaker 2: for the biggest events in sports. Trump also attended the
Speaker 2: Super Bowl, the NBA Finals, and of course, the UFC events,
Speaker 2: connecting with fans beyond Washington's political class. White House Press
Speaker 2: Secretary Caroline Lovett called the visit a fitting conclusion to
Speaker 2: a tournament that demonstrated America's ability to host the world
Speaker 2: on the grandest stage. Now, many Europeans and foreigners have
Speaker 2: come here and been astounded about how beautiful a hospital
Speaker 2: a country the United States is. Despite the false and
Speaker 2: biased media coverage indicating the contrary that you see abroad,
Speaker 2: they're surprised when they get here. President Trump also said
Speaker 2: no that he'd like to see the United States hold
Speaker 2: a future World Cup of its own. Left wing activists
Speaker 2: attempted to jeck politics into the finals by distributing red
Speaker 2: cards and urging fans to protest Donald Trump and President
Speaker 2: Infantino during the trophy presentation, but those feudal efforts seem
Speaker 2: mostly fizzle out. The image here was unmistakable, America hosting
Speaker 2: the world and the quintessential American president proudly displaying our
Speaker 2: nation on the global stage. Meanwhile, if you've had trouble breathing,
Speaker 2: you're not alone. We've all been choking with smoke from
Speaker 2: the Canadian fires. President Trump is demanding accountability from Canada
Speaker 2: as wildfire once again pours across the border and threatens
Speaker 2: the health of millions of Americans in what I would
Speaker 2: have to call a blistering, true social post. President Trump
Speaker 2: said the economic damage caused by Canada's failure to manage
Speaker 2: its for US should be added to existing tariffs on
Speaker 2: Canadian goods. The President accused of the Canadian officials of
Speaker 2: neglecting basic forest management, including rush clearing and debris removal,
Speaker 2: allowing dangerous smoke to become a costly annual crisis. Now
Speaker 2: for the United States, Trump called the polluted air dangerous
Speaker 2: and totally unacceptable, arguing that American families, businesses, and taxpayers
Speaker 2: should not be forced to absorb billions of dollars in
Speaker 2: damage caused by another country's negligence. More than one hundred
Speaker 2: million people reportedly under air quality alerts last week, with
Speaker 2: smoke affecting major cities including Minneapolis, Chicago, Detroit, and Yes, Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. Concerns were also raised about conditions surrounding last
Speaker 2: night's World Cup Fireland, New Jersey. Thankfully, those concerns did
Speaker 2: not come to frusion and the game could be played
Speaker 2: without interruption. The Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded by
Speaker 2: amphicizing clean energy policy and criticizing America energy production as
Speaker 2: if this is our fault. This is a typical response
Speaker 2: from a bureau crowd who wants to shirk responsibilities. However,
Speaker 2: Canada has neglected its responsibility to properly maintain its force,
Speaker 2: and its national government has failed to prevent predictable disasters
Speaker 2: from repeatedly harming their neighbors. This is bureaucratic incompetence and
Speaker 2: malevolence at work, and it needs to be punished through tariffs.
Speaker 2: President Trump say's planned to speak directly to Carti about
Speaker 2: Canada's response, but Prime Minister Carney is no doubt dreading
Speaker 2: that call. The bottom line is that America should not
Speaker 2: pay the price for foreign mismanagement, whether the damage comes
Speaker 2: from unfair trade, illegal immigration, or polluted air crossing the border.
Speaker 2: The United States says every right to defend its citizens
Speaker 2: and to demand compensation. Canada will have to suffer the
Speaker 2: economic consequences if it doesn't get its wildfire situation under control. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: the Trump administration is putting states on notice they must
Speaker 2: secure their elections, clean up their voter rolls, or their
Speaker 2: federal grant money will be going by Homeland Security Secretary
Speaker 2: Mark way Mullen said, participation in the Save election Integrity
Speaker 2: program will become a condition for states seeking DHS funding
Speaker 2: connected to federal elections. Finally, from actual consequences, the program
Speaker 2: allows states to work with federal officials to identify potentially
Speaker 2: ineligible voters and to strengthen voting system security. President Donald
Speaker 2: Trump pronounced Thursday that the Department of Homeland Security had
Speaker 2: been ordered to alert states about suspected non citizens on
Speaker 2: their voter rolls and demand the immediate removal of anyone
Speaker 2: legally in eligible to vote. Secretary Mullen said that states
Speaker 2: seeking federal reimbursement must secure their voting machines and regularly
Speaker 2: scrub their voter registration lists. The standard, he argue, is
Speaker 2: that only legally eligible American citizens should be choosing American leaders.
Speaker 2: Seems like common sense to me. The Department of Homeland
Speaker 2: Security has identify more than two hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 2: potential non citizen registers in California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and
Speaker 2: Nevada alone. I mean, the sheer number of these illegals
Speaker 2: who potentially could vote in elections underscores why accurate voter
Speaker 2: roles matter. Where there's bad doubt in the system, they
Speaker 2: can enable widespread fraud. Of course the Democrats they know this.
Speaker 2: That's why it's down to a science during the fraudulent
Speaker 2: presidential election of twenty twenty, regardless of the obfiscations of
Speaker 2: the Democrats, Protecting election integrities not voter suppression. It's actually
Speaker 2: the foundation of public trust. Every illegal ballot risks canceling
Speaker 2: the vote of a lawful voter, and states, except in
Speaker 2: federal election money, should be expected to meet basic security
Speaker 2: requirements without exception. Secretary Mullett also criticized major television networks
Speaker 2: as I did earlier, for declining to carry President Trump's
Speaker 2: historic election security address just last week, accusing the media
Speaker 2: of ignoring legitimate national security concerns. The administration has not
Speaker 2: waivered in its stance. Citizenship must mean something, that voting
Speaker 2: laws must be enforced, and that federal taxpayers should never
Speaker 2: subsidized states that refuse to protect the ballot. It's time
Speaker 2: to cut off the states that run elections like a
Speaker 2: third word dealt bploclet. Meanwhile, comedian Shane Gillis has delivered
Speaker 2: a knockout blow to cancel culture. On Friday Night, The
Speaker 2: Pennsylvania Natives sold seventy seven forty seven tickets to a
Speaker 2: solo performance at the Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, setting
Speaker 2: a new Guinness World record for comedy ticket sales nearly
Speaker 2: seventy four thousand people back the home of the Eagles,
Speaker 2: surpassing the previous attendance record set in Berlin that was
Speaker 2: back in two thousand and eight. The achievement is particularly
Speaker 2: satisfied because Gillis was once treated as radioactive by the
Speaker 2: entertainment establishment. In twenty nineteen, Saturday Night Live hired him,
Speaker 2: then they fired him before he ever appeared, after old
Speaker 2: podcast jokes were dragged into the outrage machine and declared
Speaker 2: politically incorrect. But to see the public here had other
Speaker 2: ideas instead of just sparing. Gillis built his audience directly
Speaker 2: through YouTube podcasts, touring, and Netflix specials. He's twenty twenty
Speaker 2: one special Live in Austin and his twenty twenty three
Speaker 2: Beautiful Dogs helped turn into one of the biggest and
Speaker 2: hottest comedians in America. Over the past two years, he
Speaker 2: has sold more than one million tickets and broken attendance
Speaker 2: records at arenas across the country. The record, setting a
Speaker 2: hometown triumph for Gillis, featured many celebrities across the spectrum,
Speaker 2: including Dave Chappelle, Mit Mill, Jason Kelcey, Cooper Dujon, and
Speaker 2: Jordan Mate Tallada. But Gillis also shattered Kevin Hart's previous
Speaker 2: Dadium record in Philadelphia, so the message could not be clear. Cancel.
Speaker 2: Culture is losing its iron grip on society. Americans retired
Speaker 2: of humor being policed by corporate gatekeepers and professional scolds.
Speaker 2: These creeps almost destroyed comedy completely in the twenty tens.
Speaker 2: Has never been based on market demand. It was censorship
Speaker 2: based on rigid ideological bounds. Your comedy had to be
Speaker 2: politically correct. Of course, you could always get an audience view.
Speaker 2: Just attack President Donald Trump. The people clearly walk comedians
Speaker 2: who are fearless, honest, and politically incorrect. Shane Gillis was
Speaker 2: supposed to be canceled. Instead he came back bigger, louder,
Speaker 2: and more successful than ever. I'm Roger Stones listening to
Speaker 2: the Stone Zone. Don't go away, because we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone, entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network. Rogerson was persecuted.
Speaker 3: People forget he's actually a brilliant, brilliant political analyst.
Speaker 2: Now get him his zone it's the Stone Zone.
Speaker 1: Here's Rogerstone.
Speaker 2: Welcome back into the Stone Zone. Coming up next to Chris,
Speaker 2: who is the head of the People's Audit, joins us
Speaker 2: to talk about whether America can have a fair, free,
Speaker 2: honest election in twenty six. You don't want to stick
Speaker 2: around for that. The Republican National Committee is taking six
Speaker 2: states to court over election laws that allow people who
Speaker 2: have never lived in those states to cast absentee ballots.
Speaker 2: Republican National Chairman Joe Gruders, a longtime friend of mine, says,
Speaker 2: if you have never lived in a state, you should
Speaker 2: not be deciding its elections, a notion that to me
Speaker 2: seems like common sense. The legal challenge follows the Republican
Speaker 2: victory in North Carolina, where a judge struck down a
Speaker 2: law allowing citizens born overseas who had never lived in
Speaker 2: the state to vote using their parents' former address. Now,
Speaker 2: the Republican National Committee has noted that the lawsuits do
Speaker 2: not target military personnel, diplomats, or other Americans protected under
Speaker 2: federal overseas voting laws. Instead, they focus on civilians with
Speaker 2: no service record, no genuine residency connects beyond a relative's
Speaker 2: old mailing address. Nevada could be the biggest test. Nevada
Speaker 2: is a state that mails an absentee ballot a mail
Speaker 2: in ballot to everyone on the voter rolls, whether they
Speaker 2: request one or not. Last time I was actually in Nevada,
Speaker 2: a guy showed me five separate ballots, all of them
Speaker 2: mail dam at the same address. I said, what is this?
Speaker 2: He said, well, one of them is me. I said,
Speaker 2: who are the other?
Speaker 3: Four?
Speaker 2: Said? Those are people who rented my apartment prior to
Speaker 2: my living there. I said, and they're still actively on
Speaker 2: the voting list. He said, well, if I was dishonest,
Speaker 2: I could have cast all four of these votes, which
Speaker 2: of course would have been a federal crime. I said, well,
Speaker 2: who are the other people? He said, well, two of
Speaker 2: them are dead, one of them still lives in Nevada,
Speaker 2: but they are registered at another address, and the other
Speaker 2: one has moved out of state. Ah, now you see
Speaker 2: the problem. I'm Roger Stone to listen to stone Zone.
Speaker 2: Don't go away, because we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: The stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Apple podcast Networks.
Speaker 2: Welcome back into the stone Zone. Well, last Thursday night,
Speaker 2: I was in Washington, D C. For the President's addressed
Speaker 2: to the nation. It's a good thing I was there,
Speaker 2: because if I were wanted to see it on the
Speaker 2: national news networks, I wouldn't have been able to find it.
Speaker 2: For some strange reason, the address of this importance was
Speaker 2: not covered by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and the rest,
Speaker 2: But the President essentially said that he was declassifying documents
Speaker 2: that proved that the communist Chinese had access to over
Speaker 2: two hundred and twenty million voter records of American voters.
Speaker 2: Of course, I expected there to be arrests of somebody
Speaker 2: the next morning, because this information was kept from the
Speaker 2: President by those in our intelligence services, the FBI, the CIA,
Speaker 2: and so on. Of course that hasn't happened. But I
Speaker 2: did know immediately who I wanted to have as a
Speaker 2: guest for today's show, and that is Chris Jersky. Now,
Speaker 2: Chris Jersky is an entrepreneur who helps scale organizations troubleshoots, security,
Speaker 2: financial and operational issues, then he build systems to fix them.
Speaker 2: While looking at the twenty twenty election, one of the
Speaker 2: most starting discoveries was that people who sold their homes
Speaker 2: and moved out of the state were actually still voting
Speaker 2: from their Florida residences. So Chris jon created the People's
Speaker 2: Audit to help Florida citizens check who's voting from their homes.
Speaker 2: But since twenty twenty four, he's joined forces with ego AI,
Speaker 2: a firm to build a new system called Elie e
Speaker 2: Lly that currently monitors forty six states and DC. Chris Jersky,
Speaker 2: Welcome into the Stone Zone.
Speaker 3: Thanks for having me back. Thing.
Speaker 2: So, Chris, how do you feel about the President's address
Speaker 2: the other night and what are the implications.
Speaker 3: Well, much like you and some of the other people
Speaker 3: that fought all the way through twenty twenty, and especially
Speaker 3: some of the people that went up to Washington for
Speaker 3: January sixth, to feel vindicated to at least be that
Speaker 3: it's been addressed. But just like you said earlier, we're
Speaker 3: still waiting, hopeful, and waiting for the arrest because there
Speaker 3: is no real solutions until people go to jail and
Speaker 3: are punished for what they did here. And the other
Speaker 3: thing is that the systems themselves, the systems are all
Speaker 3: still in place, exactly what we had in twenty twenty
Speaker 3: is all that entire regime is still in place.
Speaker 2: That is precisely my concern. I mean, first of all.
Speaker 2: I am astounded by the mainstream media and their democratic
Speaker 2: handmaiden's ability to continue to say with a straight face
Speaker 2: that there's no evidence whatsoever of electionaire regular It's no
Speaker 2: evidence of voter fraud, no evidence of ballot fraud, no
Speaker 2: evidence of problems with paper ballots, mail in ballots, no
Speaker 2: problems with the machine, and that if you say otherwise,
Speaker 2: you're some kind of a dangerous nut, even though of
Speaker 2: course you have a First Amendment right to say exactly that.
Speaker 2: What I've said, I think you would agree with this
Speaker 2: is overwhelming evidence of irregularities. And let's try to take
Speaker 2: this apart. Where is the greatest danger here in the
Speaker 2: voter list? Is it in the manipulability and instability and
Speaker 2: insecurity of the machines? Or is it in the mail
Speaker 2: in ballots?
Speaker 1: I mean?
Speaker 2: Or is it all three?
Speaker 3: It's all of the above. And also I would add
Speaker 3: to that as the political machinery that sets themselves up.
Speaker 3: You probably know about a lot of the grassroots being
Speaker 3: squeezed out of the local politics in Florida. That's one
Speaker 3: of the oldest ways of basically pushing and manipulating politics.
Speaker 3: But I think the biggest part of the fuel that
Speaker 3: goes into the steel, starts with the voter rolls, and
Speaker 3: it ends up with mail in ballots. Mostly they can
Speaker 3: generate as many voters as they need and then with
Speaker 3: mail in ballots send those votes in.
Speaker 2: So how do we fix our voter lists? Let's start there.
Speaker 3: The biggest thing is that there's laws already on the
Speaker 3: books NIVRA, which stands for the National Voter Registration Act,
Speaker 3: that was created in nineteen ninety three. This is long
Speaker 3: before the machines came along. Was clear and black and
Speaker 3: white that the citizens, the voter roles belong to the citizens,
Speaker 3: and that the locals have a duty to make sure
Speaker 3: that the voter roles are cleaned of what's very important,
Speaker 3: in eligible voters. A lot of the problems we have
Speaker 3: now with most of these states, because I monitor changes
Speaker 3: month to month, is they're not removing anybody most of
Speaker 3: the time. They basically just go ahead and mark people
Speaker 3: as inactive and then they keep them on the voter roles,
Speaker 3: and it's kind of like fuel that whenever they need
Speaker 3: to have an extra vote, they have this pool of
Speaker 3: people that they can pull from, either be it real
Speaker 3: or people that have moved out of state or died.
Speaker 3: The reality is is that there's just a number of
Speaker 3: ways that they could reach in and grab these voters
Speaker 3: and then basically set them as a mail in ballot.
Speaker 3: Happened over and over again. People show up at the
Speaker 3: polls and they and they're being told at the polls
Speaker 3: that they've already voted when they had no idea what
Speaker 3: they're talking about. So essentially, mail and ballots are coming
Speaker 3: in for these people when they're not paying attention and
Speaker 3: voting on their behalf.
Speaker 2: So how do we fix this.
Speaker 3: One of the things we did was we built a
Speaker 3: system called ELI that is going through and following NIVRA
Speaker 3: that law to a te essentially using the tools that
Speaker 3: they outlined in nineteen ninety four to how to clean
Speaker 3: the voter roles. But it goes far beyond that. Really,
Speaker 3: it's basically citizen involvement. We've seen the biggest tides turn
Speaker 3: when citizens and the grassroots get involved. And our system
Speaker 3: is designed to have volunteers come in and over and
Speaker 3: basically give them the opportunity to look over their local
Speaker 3: voter roles and find issues and bring those to their
Speaker 3: local officials. And I think that's really what was the
Speaker 3: model in Florida, we remove like two million voters out
Speaker 3: of the voter rolls between twenty twenty four and twenty
Speaker 3: twenty five, and a grand majority of its just happened
Speaker 3: to be a Democrat. Wasn't like we were looking for them.
Speaker 3: But the biggest problems we had in Florida were like
Speaker 3: a part and complexes and things like that, where people
Speaker 3: moved out and basically we're already living in another state
Speaker 3: just they were never removed from the voter roles. But
Speaker 3: it goes more than that. I mean, ultimately we have
Speaker 3: to get back to a paper ballot and a basically
Speaker 3: a hand counted paper ballot at the local station that
Speaker 3: I think is going to be the ultimate solution. The
Speaker 3: voter roles are just the first start of it, and
Speaker 3: the voter roles are ongoing throughout the entire year, whereas
Speaker 3: our elections just happened on that hopefully one day, instead
Speaker 3: of like in California, for an entire month.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I want to ask who you thought of that
Speaker 2: Los Angeles election, because it seemed to me, Look, I'm
Speaker 2: not a mathematician, but it seemed to me that these
Speaker 2: late arrival ballots defied mathematical probability. When they went eighty
Speaker 2: percent for the candidate who was an election night was
Speaker 2: running third and a poor third even conceded. And then
Speaker 2: suddenly in the days afterwards, there's a spurt of thousands
Speaker 2: of new ballots and there's two Democrats in the race.
Speaker 2: Remember they have this jungle primary system in which any
Speaker 2: candidate of any party runs in one election, So you
Speaker 2: have multiple Democrats in this case, I think you had
Speaker 2: also had multiple Republicans, but one principal Republican. Then you
Speaker 2: see this influx of ballots that defy mathematical probability. But
Speaker 2: we both know nothing will be done about that, will it?
Speaker 3: Well? I mean, the people keep on waking up and
Speaker 3: seeing it. I think that where we started in twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: especially in Florida, when we said that the voter or
Speaker 3: the elections were red teer, they kind of laughed it off.
Speaker 3: But after Kerry Lake and let's saying the Los Angeles
Speaker 3: election you're talking about, more and more people are realizing
Speaker 3: that is the game six And especially with these late
Speaker 3: count votes, that's the most obvious where they just count
Speaker 3: until they get the right count and then the election's called.
Speaker 3: But that's the whole thing, Like we call it that
Speaker 3: f curve that is famous for the twenty twenty election,
Speaker 3: that Biden had eighty million votes come out of just
Speaker 3: nowhere at the last minute, and as you said that,
Speaker 3: there were the grand majority of the last remaining votes
Speaker 3: were all for Biden. If you do anything in math
Speaker 3: or statistics, they usually can can. That's how they do
Speaker 3: typical polling is they could figure out like where the
Speaker 3: election is going by basically doing sample sizes, and those
Speaker 3: samples they pretty close to one another. It's very strange
Speaker 3: and absolutely suspicious when you see a large number of
Speaker 3: votes towards one candidate counn all in at the last minute.
Speaker 3: It doesn't make any logical sense.
Speaker 2: If you really want to see a Democrat or a
Speaker 2: liber goal out of their mind, suggest to them that
Speaker 2: the computerized voting machines are less than perfect, that they're insecure,
Speaker 2: that they can be apt, that the numbers can be manipulated.
Speaker 2: I've seen online as you have, and sometimes in person,
Speaker 2: overwhelming evidence of it. But once again, if you have
Speaker 2: the audacity to say that in public, you'll find yourself
Speaker 2: very quickly canceled. You'll find yourself, like me, no longer
Speaker 2: allowed to be on Facebook, no longer allowed to be
Speaker 2: on Instagram, no longer allowed to be on YouTube. They
Speaker 2: take your voice if you merely ask questions but addressed
Speaker 2: for us if you will. Your view of these electronic
Speaker 2: voting machines and the level of security.
Speaker 3: The biggest thing is is anything that's digital can be fabricated.
Speaker 3: It's essentially like why you go buy a house. You
Speaker 3: have to show up and actually sign your documents in
Speaker 3: person with a notary. You can imagine as soon as
Speaker 3: you walked out of that building if it was a
Speaker 3: digitized contract, they could change anything they want, including the
Speaker 3: interest rate or whatever. That's why we as a normal
Speaker 3: civil society have been using paper documentation with signatures and
Speaker 3: witnesses for centuries. As the actual physical presence of you
Speaker 3: basically being there and voting. Anything can be happening with
Speaker 3: these voter machines. They can change who's voting, they can
Speaker 3: change as many people as they want. They can change
Speaker 3: the results at the last minute. They can actually make
Speaker 3: it as much as an audit proof eel as possible,
Speaker 3: because when you're looking through the digital records, it will
Speaker 3: appear that those ballots are there. We've even had situations
Speaker 3: in Georgia where they went through and they found duplicated
Speaker 3: images and fabricated images where the ovals were filled in
Speaker 3: and pressed in for different candidates. And unless you're looking
Speaker 3: at a piece of paper, when you're physically holding a
Speaker 3: piece of paper, you could probably get the sense of
Speaker 3: something's wrong, especially if you see like a flat oval,
Speaker 3: it looks more like something printed at But whenever a
Speaker 3: human touches a piece of paper, there's usually an imprint.
Speaker 3: When they're physically filling in an oval, it's just much
Speaker 3: like your fingerprint. That's why it's very hard to cheat
Speaker 3: at scale. If they tried to basically have a hand
Speaker 3: counted paper ballot, that would put that all to rest,
Speaker 3: because at the local level you might hear every small,
Speaker 3: small races where they still do that and just like
Speaker 3: they did back in New York, Tammany Hall is much
Speaker 3: famous is for that. But it would go a long
Speaker 3: way to stopping people stealing a governor's race, a senator's race, presidency,
Speaker 3: things like that. And you can cheat at scale now
Speaker 3: when it's all digital.
Speaker 2: You're exactly right. I remember a couple of years ago
Speaker 2: when I went to vote the person in line for
Speaker 2: in front of me, let's call in my John Smith
Speaker 2: presented photo id, a driver's license and stated his address,
Speaker 2: and the clerk behind the desk, who's you know, A
Speaker 2: day worker, said oh, I'm sorry, mister Smith. You voted
Speaker 2: this morning? He said, no, I haven't. He said, yes,
Speaker 2: you definitely voted this morning. And he says, let to
Speaker 2: ask you a question. Is there also an Almah Smith
Speaker 2: at the same registered at the same dress as I am.
Speaker 2: She looked at the voter rolls and she said, yes,
Speaker 2: she voted also. He said, well, that's my mother. She's
Speaker 2: been dead for fifteen years, so she could not possibly vote.
Speaker 2: In the end, they let him cast a provisional ballot.
Speaker 2: Who knows whatever happened to it. I doubt it was counted.
Speaker 2: I got a text from a woman after yesterday's show
Speaker 2: who sent me a video of she and others presenting
Speaker 2: forty three thousand affidavits from people in Arizona, all of
Speaker 2: whom had gone to vote, all of whom had shown
Speaker 2: up at a polling place, all of whom had been
Speaker 2: told they had already voted. In this case, the governor Kemp,
Speaker 2: rather than accept this, slipped out the back door of
Speaker 2: the building. So this is an enormous ongoing problem, and
Speaker 2: I'm not optimistic about twenty twenty six. I wish I was,
Speaker 2: but as you correctly point now, although I think we've
Speaker 2: identified the problems, the problems don't seem to have been fixed.
Speaker 2: Federalizing our elections is not the answer. It's interesting that's
Speaker 2: what the Democrats wanted to do, and House Bill one,
Speaker 2: Senate Bill one, they wanted to federalize the elections. I
Speaker 2: still think it's best that states regulate their own elections,
Speaker 2: but the idea that Florida is the gold standard of elections,
Speaker 2: as the government told us if you live in Broward County,
Speaker 2: that's a pretty laughable statement.
Speaker 3: Yeah, as it is. Yeah, I mean that's probably the
Speaker 3: biggest thing is especially when it's digital. You can imagine,
Speaker 3: like as we've watched anything from stock trading or anything else,
Speaker 3: that information is instantly available anywhere in the world. So
Speaker 3: they could steal anything from a sheriff's race all the
Speaker 3: way up to the presidency and they don't even need
Speaker 3: to be in the country because they could be watching
Speaker 3: it from a dashboard thousands of miles away and manipulating
Speaker 3: our final results. And that's what's so furiating about all
Speaker 3: of it. Because essentially, you would think that our local
Speaker 3: officials and especially our parties would want to support our
Speaker 3: local people, but it seems like the internationalists, the globalists,
Speaker 3: have basically just bought them out because they don't have
Speaker 3: any We've been pushed back ever since the very beginning,
Speaker 3: trying to fix stuff in Florida as well as other
Speaker 3: states to get any meaningful change. We've had a couple
Speaker 3: of small things, cleaning things up here and air, but again,
Speaker 3: the big thing I see is the fraud that's with
Speaker 3: the mail in ballots and the machines.
Speaker 2: I've taken the view that they use the machines to
Speaker 2: determine the results, then they determine based on that how
Speaker 2: many votes they need. Then they just create those ballots
Speaker 2: based on names on the voter rolls of people who
Speaker 2: either never really existed, no longer exist, or have moved
Speaker 2: out of state or passed away. I think that's exactly
Speaker 2: the game that's being played. So you can't point to
Speaker 2: any one piece of this. It's not just the voter rolls.
Speaker 2: It's not just the mail in ballots, it's not just
Speaker 2: the absentees, it's not just the machines. It's all of
Speaker 2: those things. Seems to me that they all need to
Speaker 2: be fixed. Folks. If you're just tuning in, we're talking
Speaker 2: to Chris Jerski with the People's Audit and we're talking
Speaker 2: about whether the twenty twenty six elections can be free,
Speaker 2: fair and honest. We'll talk about it some more when
Speaker 2: we come back, so don't go away.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network.
Speaker 2: It's the Stone Zone. A man who's gone through hell,
Speaker 2: but he's kept going, and he's smart, and he's strong,
Speaker 2: and people love him. Not everybody, but people love him
Speaker 2: and respect him. Rogers Stone, where's Roches.
Speaker 1: Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Welcome back into the Stone Zone. It's quite hard for
Speaker 2: me to believe that, almost six years after the twenty
Speaker 2: two into the election, that we're still talking about the
Speaker 2: need for election integrity reforms. If you're just tuning in,
Speaker 2: we're finishing our interview with Chris Jerski with the People's
Speaker 2: oh It. Chris has done amazing work here in the
Speaker 2: Sunshine state of Florida to try to work for clean, fair,
Speaker 2: honest elections. Now he's working with Ego AI firm then
Speaker 2: building a system called Ellie that currently monitors the elections
Speaker 2: in forty six states and the District of Columbia. Chris,
Speaker 2: tell us about ELLIE and what you're doing there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm really excited about ELLIE because Ellie is probably
Speaker 3: the first of its kind that will follow NIVRA, which
Speaker 3: is the National Registration's Voter Registration Act of nineteen ninety three.
Speaker 3: To the TEA, it's really the only federally backed compliance
Speaker 3: tool that we have to watch the voter rolls, and
Speaker 3: the main reason for that is because we're checking to
Speaker 3: see if people have moved, if they've died, or if
Speaker 3: they've registered in another state. And we also give that
Speaker 3: information to the both local county officials as well as
Speaker 3: the citizens for free. We do ask for donations to
Speaker 3: help us out with voter roles. Voter roles are quite
Speaker 3: expensive in some states, like in a case of Alabama
Speaker 3: with forty thousand dollars just to ask for one instance
Speaker 3: of a voter role. But that system is basically probably
Speaker 3: the just a complete game changer where you can click
Speaker 3: on a voter and you can immediately see now where
Speaker 3: they've moved to. We even have property data to see
Speaker 3: if they've now deeed a house and that new state,
Speaker 3: so you have roof beyond a shadow of a doubt
Speaker 3: that this person has been moved and it needs to
Speaker 3: be removed from the voter roles.
Speaker 2: It's really it's quite simple, but it's really quite brilliant.
Speaker 2: All you're doing here is taking the list of known
Speaker 2: individuals who have moved, registered in other states and so on,
Speaker 2: in comparing it to the voter roles. Of course, they
Speaker 2: make it as expensive as possible. Of course, if people
Speaker 2: want to find you and support your work, where can
Speaker 2: they go?
Speaker 3: The easiest thing to do is to come to our
Speaker 3: website at the People's Audit dot org. That's going to
Speaker 3: be the hyphen People's Hyphenaudit dot org, and there they'll
Speaker 3: find links to my substack, my telegram and x as
Speaker 3: well as we'll put some links out there to start
Speaker 3: inviting people to ELI. Right now is invitation only, but
Speaker 3: we're basically up to about five hundred members from various states.
Speaker 3: It's just a lot of training to go into that
Speaker 3: system right away. So we want to make sure people
Speaker 3: get their hands held and know what to do when
Speaker 3: they're end of that data because it could be overwhelming.
Speaker 2: All right, So here's the man with the plan, Chris Jurski,
Speaker 2: who's joined us, and I think we did a pretty
Speaker 2: good job here today outlining the need for reform. It's
Speaker 2: still hard for me to believe that six years after
Speaker 2: the fact, six years after what I think was quite
Speaker 2: obviously the discrepancies, the anomalies, the outright fraud, and the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty election, we're still arguing about this. But as
Speaker 2: you correctly point out, both parties to be in on it,
Speaker 2: at least in some states, and there's nobody else raising
Speaker 2: these questions. That's why it's up to citizens like Chris
Speaker 2: Jersky and the People's Audit to raise these questions and
Speaker 2: keep fighting for honest elections. Chris, I want to thank
Speaker 2: you for joining us today in the Stone Zone, and
Speaker 2: also thank our audience folks. Thanks for joining us today
Speaker 2: until tomorrow, God bless you and God speak.
Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Speaker 4: You can hear The Stone Zone with Roger Stone weeknights
Speaker 4: at eight on seventy seven WABC. If you like the podcast,
Speaker 4: share it with your friends and listen anytime. I'm at
Speaker 4: wabcradio dot com and download the WABC Radio app. Hit
Speaker 4: that subscribe button. On all major podcasts platforms. Plus follow
Speaker 4: WABC on social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see
Speaker 4: you next time for a new episode, so you never
Speaker 4: have to wonder
Speaker 2: What the heck is going on here