Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Monday, the eighteenth of August,
Speaker 3: year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. I'm here today
Speaker 3: in studio with Travis and we're going to have a
Speaker 3: new format today. We're also going to take a look
Speaker 3: at many things that are being presented to us as
Speaker 3: new but perhaps not new. Were going to take a
Speaker 3: look first at the summit between Trump and Putin. What
Speaker 3: can we glean from the gossip that is coming out
Speaker 3: of the mainstream media, and of course there's many issues
Speaker 3: in terms of mainstream news. We're seeing effects of illegal
Speaker 3: immigration and people who are given commercial drivers' licenses who
Speaker 3: can't read or speak English with tragic results. And the
Speaker 3: UK multiple reports about how they're getting closer and closer
Speaker 3: to civil war. This is what is being fostered. We'll
Speaker 3: be right back. Stay with us. Well, it's great to
Speaker 3: be back, and I want to thank all of you
Speaker 3: before we begin. I want to thank you for your prayers.
Speaker 3: I want to thank God for what he has done.
Speaker 3: It was a difficult and depressing time actually for me
Speaker 3: and all the letters of encouragement were a big help,
Speaker 3: even though I don't have I didn't have the ability
Speaker 3: to really respond at that point in time. It took
Speaker 3: me a while before I could type again. I can
Speaker 3: now type now. I'm really snowed with things. So just
Speaker 3: let me think all of you collectively rather than individually.
Speaker 3: So we had over the weekend, Travis, we had a
Speaker 3: summit in Alaska, and we're going to try to sum
Speaker 3: it up because it's difficult to do that because at
Speaker 3: the center of this you have politics and international competition.
Speaker 3: Geopolitics always turns into ego politics, and the fog of
Speaker 3: war always makes it very difficult to find out what
Speaker 3: is really happening. And so right now we have a
Speaker 3: couple of people like Putin and Trump meeting together. It's
Speaker 3: all about egos and political parties, and I don't think
Speaker 3: we can trust a thing that is coming out of it.
Speaker 3: But we'll talk about a few of the things that
Speaker 3: are being pushed out. Of course, there's going to be
Speaker 3: another meeting today. You're going to have Zelensky and his
Speaker 3: backers in the EU are come to try to save
Speaker 3: him from another confrontation like you had in the Oval office.
Speaker 4: That was one of the best things I saw that
Speaker 4: Trump did, you're a small man, just get out of here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, quit whining. He has been. I would love to
Speaker 3: see Lindsey Graham in a situation like that. These perpetual
Speaker 3: warmongers who care nothing about the lives of the people
Speaker 3: that they are sacrificing, are so full of themselves, and
Speaker 3: it is really kind of good every once in a
Speaker 3: while to see one of them get his come upance.
Speaker 3: But of course he's going to have a large ento
Speaker 3: people from the EU supporting him because this is their
Speaker 3: war and they're trying to drag us into it, trying
Speaker 3: to drag us into a global war. So I hope
Speaker 3: whatever happens, and whatever egos or massaged have to be massaged,
Speaker 3: I hope that it ends up in peace. If the
Speaker 3: price we pay for peace is massaging a politician's ego,
Speaker 3: so be it. So it's kind of interesting when you
Speaker 3: look back and forth at all the gossip of this stuff.
Speaker 3: MPR put out an article which is really comical, and
Speaker 3: it was featured by Drudge, and they were just about
Speaker 3: to faint that some important documents had been printed out
Speaker 3: on the hotel printer and left for other people to
Speaker 3: discover and they did discover it, and they contacted MPR
Speaker 3: National Propaganda Radio. And when I saw the headlines, is like, whoo,
Speaker 3: I wonder what they got, you know, what kind of
Speaker 3: discussions that they get from this. And when you go
Speaker 3: to the article, you can actually see the documents that
Speaker 3: they got. It's the menu for what they're going to
Speaker 3: have for lunch.
Speaker 4: MPR's secret stuff.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, for years, Travis, we had MPR excusing
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton and her email server that was exposing all
Speaker 3: of these communications between her and foreign leaders that are
Speaker 3: born above top secret. And of course the Russia Gate
Speaker 3: thing was a red herring to distract people away from
Speaker 3: the substance of it. But here we are. They freak
Speaker 3: out over a lunch menu when they swallowed the camel
Speaker 3: of her secure document's whole it's pretty ridiculous. What we
Speaker 3: did learn is that it's actually a very nice lunch
Speaker 3: and they had krimble A for dessert. Karen was so envious.
Speaker 3: She had that a cruise and she loves Krimblea. Now
Speaker 3: that's her favorite thing. But and then you had Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 3: who is oh, the White House mocked all this, so
Speaker 3: the so called investigative journalism. That's why nobody trusts INMPR
Speaker 3: and why we're shutting them down. Yeah, we public should
Speaker 3: preserve them as exhibit a of how media can go wrong,
Speaker 3: how government media specially can go wrong.
Speaker 4: It was see if they were smart, but they would
Speaker 4: have said, if you've got some secret documents here and
Speaker 4: we want our funding back, exactly, Yeah, you guys, release
Speaker 4: the funding or we release your menu right now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the surf and turf although they gave it fancy
Speaker 3: names in that it's flat Mignon. So yeah, they kremble a.
Speaker 3: They're having crimble a. And then Hillary Clinton was complimentary
Speaker 3: to President Trump. Imagine that perhaps just had something to
Speaker 3: do with it, the fact that they have just discovered
Speaker 3: documents showing that they had shut down nineteen different Clinton
Speaker 3: Foundation investigations during the Biden administration. You know, I had
Speaker 3: Travis Charles Ortel on a couple of different times, and
Speaker 3: he is he investigated Clintons from a financial standpoint, and
Speaker 3: he was saying during the first Trump administration, why don't
Speaker 3: they just launch an investigation of her because she hasn't
Speaker 3: filed the basic paperwork for these things. She's not in
Speaker 3: compliance with what these charitable foundations have to do, and
Speaker 3: she had exposure all over that. Well, it turns out
Speaker 3: that perhaps there were some that were being done before
Speaker 3: the election. This all happened during the twenty sixteen election cycles,
Speaker 3: So this is actually before Charles Ortell and I were talking,
Speaker 3: and they had not complied with any of the reporting functions.
Speaker 3: They had not complied with the proper construction of their foundation.
Speaker 3: And of course we all know the foundation was heavily
Speaker 3: involved in some very dodgy child trafficking down in Haiti
Speaker 3: after the natural disaster there. But now they have found
Speaker 3: newly declassified information showing that this was all shut down
Speaker 3: by Sally Yates, who was the Deputy ag during the
Speaker 3: Biden administration. What a surprise is it? This is, of course,
Speaker 3: you know, the Clinton Foundation gets a pass. Clinton herself
Speaker 3: gets a pass on violating national security. The FBI's own
Speaker 3: internal memo approves that multiple FBI field offices were investigating
Speaker 3: Clinton for pay to play and for bribery, revelations that
Speaker 3: were contained in Peter Schweitzer's book Clinton Cash. So he
Speaker 3: takes a victory lamp there saying I told you so,
Speaker 3: and he did. And of course many of us were
Speaker 3: talking about that as well, a lot of it based
Speaker 3: on his investigation, but also Charles Hotel was very deep
Speaker 3: in all this stuff as well. So anyway, when you
Speaker 3: look at the way that they strained at NAT's with
Speaker 3: Trump and swallowed the Clinton Campbell's hole, it's amazing. And
Speaker 3: they point this out talking about Trump paying off a
Speaker 3: porn star. Of course that was the fining moment for
Speaker 3: his character? Was it? As if you needed another one?
Speaker 3: I mean, the First Wives Club and all the rest
Speaker 3: of this stuff, and the way he ditched his wives,
Speaker 3: hanging around with Jeffrey Epstein, those are also defining characteristics.
Speaker 3: It's kind of interesting to see how all this Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein stuff is blown up when the Trump cult was
Speaker 3: so eager to explain away all the porn star pavements
Speaker 3: and other things like that.
Speaker 4: Really brings in a question just how can they not
Speaker 4: see him for who he really is? Yeah, do you
Speaker 4: think he's not the type of guy that would hang
Speaker 4: out with Jeffrey Epstein? Do you really think that what
Speaker 4: makes what in his life points to that? Explain it
Speaker 4: to me?
Speaker 3: Yeah, They look at this as if this is this
Speaker 3: Epstein connection is some kind of huge outlier. It's like no,
Speaker 3: is right in line with his entire life everything that behavior. Yeah,
Speaker 3: absolutely does. They also pointed out as many as forty
Speaker 3: state Democrat parties were taking money and channeling it to Clinton,
Speaker 3: which is something of an election violation as well. So
Speaker 3: they are teeing up for a lot of lawfare, and
Speaker 3: I think it's justified they As I said before, certainly
Speaker 3: if you wanted to come after the Democrats for corruption,
Speaker 3: it is a target rich environment. I'm just concerned that
Speaker 3: it not be seen as a personal revenge for Trump.
Speaker 3: But that's precisely what he wants it to be seen as.
Speaker 3: Trump doesn't want people to fear the Constitution. He wants
Speaker 3: people to fear him. So and that's the problem because
Speaker 3: what that's going to do is foster an environment where
Speaker 3: the winner seeks to lock up the loser, like some
Speaker 3: third world country. That's what we've become, a third world
Speaker 3: corrupt dictatorship with nuclear weapons, isn't it. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Well, it also speaks to the fact if he gives justice,
Speaker 4: he's just doing his job. But if it's seen as
Speaker 4: this petty revenge, he will be like, oh, it's only
Speaker 4: because it's Trump, you know, no one else is going
Speaker 4: to do this, yeah, against defeat his ego more.
Speaker 3: That's right, and it's also to say, you know, you
Speaker 3: better back off of us, you know, once we're out
Speaker 3: of power, back off of my family, that type of thing.
Speaker 3: So what happened in the in the summit, we don't
Speaker 3: really know. There are some reports that of course they're
Speaker 3: not going to talk about a ceasefire, it's going to
Speaker 3: be peace or nothing. So it's going to be warm peace,
Speaker 3: no in between. And what Putin is proposing publicly that's
Speaker 3: been leaked out, as he says, you let us have
Speaker 3: control of the don Bass region and we will freeze
Speaker 3: the front lines in southern Kirsan and Zaparizia and there
Speaker 3: will be no more. There's no Domino theory. It's what
Speaker 3: he's trying to put out. Essentially, NATO has used Ukraine
Speaker 3: as a cat's paw in a passive aggressive way, continually
Speaker 3: moving towards Russia. And that's a large part of what
Speaker 3: the democrat coup in Ukraine was all about. And when
Speaker 3: all this Russia Gate stuff is happening, we talked a
Speaker 3: great deal about the DNC connections in Ukraine, Chilupa and
Speaker 3: many others, and how heavily. The DNC was involved in
Speaker 3: the inner circles around the people who are doing the coup,
Speaker 3: and this is something that was planned for quite some time.
Speaker 3: I thought it was always interesting, and I've mentioned that
Speaker 3: many many times. You've probably heard it before, that Sergey
Speaker 3: Arristovich in twenty nineteen Zelenski was elected on a campaign
Speaker 3: of We're going to have peace. They started a civil war.
Speaker 3: They did not want to let the eastern areas of
Speaker 3: Ukraine remain with Russia, which was the preference of the
Speaker 3: people there that went into break away. They wanted to secede,
Speaker 3: and they had a right to do that, a human
Speaker 3: right to do that. Instead, what they decided to do
Speaker 3: was to shelby the civilian populations there and have a
Speaker 3: war that at that point in time in twenty nineteen
Speaker 3: or been going on for five years. So there was
Speaker 3: a Ukrainian TV and I played the clip many times.
Speaker 3: I won't play it again today. I'll just sum it
Speaker 3: up real quickly. The reporter asked Arrostovich, who was the
Speaker 3: Zolensky administration representative, what the chances were for peace, because
Speaker 3: remember they had been engaged in a civil war that
Speaker 3: was initiated by Kiev for five years and he said, oh,
Speaker 3: it's not going to happen. He said, instead, in three years,
Speaker 3: and this is twenty nineteen, said in three years, we're
Speaker 3: going to be at war with Russias. She said, that's horrible,
Speaker 3: and he says, yeah, we will be havoced, we'll be devastated,
Speaker 3: but the good news is we'll get into NATO. So
Speaker 3: this stuff was all planned from the very beginning. They
Speaker 3: even had the timing down as the winter was going
Speaker 3: to happen, that they some of you.
Speaker 4: May die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.
Speaker 3: Exactly. They don't care a whit about the Ukrainians. And
Speaker 3: at the very beginning of this you had analysts in
Speaker 3: neutral India saying military analysts saying they're going to fight
Speaker 3: them to the last Ukrainian but they have no chance
Speaker 3: of winning. And now we're seeing in the mainstream media,
Speaker 3: as I say, well, Trump is setting up Zelenski to fail.
Speaker 3: Now the Ukrainian people were set up to die.
Speaker 4: We're seeing the world's first self inflicted genocide.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, well not the first. We've had many politicians
Speaker 3: who have no other people under the bus in the past.
Speaker 3: But the thing that I thought was interesting about this
Speaker 3: was that Putin said, well, even you know, we don't
Speaker 3: want them in, NATO will even give you kind of
Speaker 3: Article five protections, which Article five of the NATO Compact
Speaker 3: or whatever the thing is says that if one of
Speaker 3: us is attacked, all of us are. It's like three
Speaker 3: musketeers all for one on one for all. Anyway, the
Speaker 3: uh that's he said, we will allow that to happen.
Speaker 3: But then the question becomes because some of the news
Speaker 3: media reports indicate that there may be American troops involved
Speaker 3: to protect that. We hope that we don't get stuck
Speaker 3: in some kind of a quagmire like that. But nevertheless,
Speaker 3: if Putin puts that on the table. I've said all
Speaker 3: along that all of this nonsense about this being a
Speaker 3: domino theory that especially in the British press, Oh this
Speaker 3: is it. You know, this is just like Hitler. He's
Speaker 3: going to next He's going to come for France, you know,
Speaker 3: and all the rest of this nonsense. I think that's
Speaker 3: absolute nonsense.
Speaker 4: Also, at this point France might be so lucky.
Speaker 3: Yeah, would they actually be worse off than they are
Speaker 3: with Macron? Who knows? These dictators are starting to look
Speaker 3: more and more alike, aren't they. So this is being
Speaker 3: portrayed by the mainstream media as a total cave in
Speaker 3: and betrayal by Trump. But the question is who's being betrayed.
Speaker 3: Is NATO and their geopolitical goals being betrayed? Are the
Speaker 3: people of Ukraine being betrayed? They were the ones who
Speaker 3: were set up to fail, to be killed, to be
Speaker 3: sacrificed on the geopolitical altar or the ego political altar.
Speaker 3: Putin has demanded that Ukraine withdraw from the Nesk and
Speaker 3: Luhansk regions as a condition for ending the war, but
Speaker 3: told Trump that he could freeze the rest of the
Speaker 3: front line if his core demands were met. Now, Zelenski
Speaker 3: doesn't want to have any of this. He and the
Speaker 3: Europeans are saying, we're not going to trade land for
Speaker 3: peace type of thing. Now, you know they they want
Speaker 3: the land just as much as anybody else. The question
Speaker 3: is what's in the best interest of the people that
Speaker 3: they were there to govern. Nobody looks at that kind
Speaker 3: of calculation to the Travis. I mean, it isn't you
Speaker 3: know you're you're there as a leader, if you are
Speaker 3: a legitimate leader, you are looking after the welfare of
Speaker 3: your own people. I think by that definition we don't
Speaker 3: have any legitimate leaders in the West. Nowhere US included
Speaker 3: that we have people like that. Anyway, there's going to
Speaker 3: be a meeting today in DC Zelenski and all the
Speaker 3: usual suspects in the EU are going to be showing
Speaker 3: up as well. And so the big question mark that
Speaker 3: we don't really have any details over are exactly how
Speaker 3: does this Article five protection that is going to be
Speaker 3: extended to a non NATO country, How does that exactly work?
Speaker 3: But by floating that out there, what he's essentially saying
Speaker 3: is that we'll guarantee that there's not going to be
Speaker 3: an attack, and he promises that they're going to pass
Speaker 3: a law that will make invading Ukraine illegal. I'm sure
Speaker 3: that will stop them.
Speaker 4: Or that was the problem before, right, we just didn't
Speaker 4: have a law in place that prevents Ukrainian invasions.
Speaker 3: If only we had a law that, let's say, protect
Speaker 3: the free speech in the United States of the UK,
Speaker 3: wouldn't that be wonderful?
Speaker 4: We all know nobody ever violates the law.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Ukraine is now an invasion free zone.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and then who enforces that? Right? So they said
Speaker 3: witkoff Is, saying Russia's agreed to enact a law that
Speaker 3: would not go after any other European countries and violate
Speaker 3: their sovereignty. The Russians agreed on enshrining legislatively language that
Speaker 3: would prevent them from or that they would attest to
Speaker 3: not attempting to take any more land from Ukraine after
Speaker 3: a peace feel where they would attest to not violating
Speaker 3: any European borders. I don't think it was ever really
Speaker 3: about that. If you go back and look at history,
Speaker 3: we don't even know where these places are on the
Speaker 3: map let alone the history of it. But I thought
Speaker 3: it was interesting. I mentioned the very beginning of this,
Speaker 3: you had the British Defense semester say we beat the
Speaker 3: Russians in Crimea once before, and we can beat them again.
Speaker 3: It's like, why were the Russians in Crimea when you
Speaker 3: fought bought them in the eighteen hundreds. It's because Crimea
Speaker 3: and the Ukraine were a part of Russia as long
Speaker 3: as America has been a country. And it's only a
Speaker 3: recent invention that Ukraine got its independence from Russia. After
Speaker 3: the breakup of the Soviet Union and a lot of
Speaker 3: hard feelings there because of things like the helto Warner.
Speaker 3: It's not to say that the Russians treat them well,
Speaker 3: but they did have them as part of their territory
Speaker 3: going back to Catherine the Great. So plus it's a
Speaker 3: very important port that is there. But the people are
Speaker 3: tied linguistically, culturally, religiously to Russia, many of them, regardless
Speaker 3: of how they were treated. So a European coalition is
Speaker 3: looking to set up a force to police any future
Speaker 3: piece in Ukraine. But the question is when NATO does anything,
Speaker 3: is it really going to be the United States that
Speaker 3: is doing it. We'll see how that works out. There's
Speaker 3: no details about how it's going to work out, and
Speaker 3: of course most of this stuff is just speculation at
Speaker 3: this point. And Rubio is trying to be poetic. He says,
Speaker 3: you know, we're not quite there yet. We're on the
Speaker 3: precipice of a piece, We're not on the edge of it.
Speaker 3: Maybe he should go back and get a dictionary, but
Speaker 3: I do think progress was made towards one. So he's
Speaker 3: trying to be Churchillian. I guess, you know, this is
Speaker 3: not the end, but it is the beginning of the
Speaker 3: end or whatever. I guess.
Speaker 4: Go Rubio is not even half the man Winston Churchill,
Speaker 4: was it. I mean that literally, basically, both vertically and horizontally.
Speaker 4: My comment before all this was, if Zelensky is not there,
Speaker 4: what can Trump and Putin really do? Zelenski says, no,
Speaker 4: what does it matter?
Speaker 3: Well, I saw a headline this morning that a Russian
Speaker 3: tank just went because war is still ongoing, Russian tank
Speaker 3: just went into battle flying an American flag. So I
Speaker 3: guess we could send weapons to Russia instead of to Ukraine.
Speaker 4: Maybe that's the move. Maybe we fund both sides that
Speaker 4: way so we usually do right, we were slipping on
Speaker 4: our game here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we could go back to the way we usually
Speaker 3: do it, funding both sides. No, it could stop tomorrow
Speaker 3: if he would stop giving weapons to Zolensky. I mean,
Speaker 3: EU can't really keep this stuff up. They're moving now
Speaker 3: from after collapsing their economies with a Green New Deal,
Speaker 3: and they don't really have a manufacturing base. Now they're
Speaker 3: going to go into massive Keynesian debt in order to
Speaker 3: try to create a military state in Germany. Especially, so,
Speaker 3: as I said before, we got the usual suspects that
Speaker 3: are going to be showing up today. We're going to
Speaker 3: have Macron is going to be there. You're going to
Speaker 3: have Fred Mertz.
Speaker 4: Taking a brief break from suing Candice Owens.
Speaker 3: I see, you're going to have Fred Mertz in Germany,
Speaker 3: you know. And we're going to have maybe even Ricky
Speaker 3: and Lucy will show up. I don't know, but they're
Speaker 3: all going to show up as moral support for Zelensky.
Speaker 3: And it'll be interesting to see if Trump has the
Speaker 3: backbone to stand up to all these people. I think
Speaker 3: it's still a nipping question. So many people are going
Speaker 3: You have Ursula fond of lying will be there, Kure
Speaker 3: Starmer will be there. And then in addition to that,
Speaker 3: you're going to have Mark Ruta, the guy who was
Speaker 3: a Prime Minister of the Netherlands, but he tried to
Speaker 3: destroy all the farm arms in the Netherlands and they
Speaker 3: organized against him and kicked him out of being prime minister.
Speaker 3: So then NATO hired him. That should tell you where
Speaker 3: NATO is in terms of a concern for their own people.
Speaker 4: It's a revolving door of these people. They get thrown
Speaker 4: out one place and they just pop right back up
Speaker 4: somewhere else.
Speaker 3: That's right. So it'll be kind of interesting to see
Speaker 3: what happens, and we should know a little bit more
Speaker 3: today after this meeting in Washington. There may be some
Speaker 3: good sound bites that have come out of it. European
Speaker 3: leaders also fear a repeat of Zelenski's last visit to
Speaker 3: the White House, which was a total disaster for their side,
Speaker 3: so they're trying to prevent that from happening again. And
Speaker 3: after that, if you remember, there was a temporary cutoff
Speaker 3: of American aid for the war effort. Trump then started
Speaker 3: it back up again. That's why I say the guy
Speaker 3: is he may go complete taco on us with this
Speaker 3: always chickening out here another allies stand raided to support
Speaker 3: the next stage to end the war. The reality is
Speaker 3: is that they know what Zelensky is. They're just taggling
Speaker 3: over the price. The man is a prostitute, willing to
Speaker 3: kill his own people, and one of the things that
Speaker 3: they could do is pay him to go away and
Speaker 3: live on the front are air in one of the
Speaker 3: many chateaus.
Speaker 4: That right, How many dresses do we need to buy
Speaker 4: your wife before you'll leave Ukraine alone? Zelenski?
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's so. Vanderalayan, fond of line Ursula said with
Speaker 3: regard to any territorial questions in Ukraine. Our position is clear.
Speaker 3: International borders cannot be changed by force. They can only
Speaker 3: be kept by force. When the people want to exercise
Speaker 3: their human right to self determination and political independence. You
Speaker 3: can bomb the people that you know to rubble, as
Speaker 3: Ukraine did for five years.
Speaker 4: I'm just curious if she's ever looked at history before,
Speaker 4: because borders have changed quite a bit throughout history, and
Speaker 4: it's almost always been by are because of force.
Speaker 3: That's right, That's right. So they're they're talking about maintaining
Speaker 3: these borders, and of course Kiev wanted to maintain their
Speaker 3: border by force against the people who wanted to be
Speaker 3: independent of them. So I don't know how about maintaining
Speaker 3: borders by peace when you have no chance of winning.
Speaker 3: That's really the question that's that's before them at this point.
Speaker 3: So again, as I said at the very beginning, you
Speaker 3: see these articles. This is coming out of the Express
Speaker 3: in the UK. It's a tabloid paper there, and they
Speaker 3: are evidently heavily tied to the government there in terms
Speaker 3: of pushing out propaganda, as they did to the pandemic.
Speaker 3: Now they're doing it for war. So the Express headline
Speaker 3: is Trump is setting Zelensky up to fail. Yeah, well
Speaker 3: that is old news. Actually, Zelenski set the Ukrainians up.
Speaker 3: Zelensky would never want to be president that gives a
Speaker 3: fifth of his country to a bully, said a former
Speaker 3: British Army officer, part of their military industrial complex. But
Speaker 3: he would sacrifice the lives of all of his people
Speaker 3: in a lost cause brought about by refusing self governance
Speaker 3: and secession, says David Knight. That really is the spirit
Speaker 3: of seventeen seventy six. Trump knows there's zero chance of
Speaker 3: a workable peace deal being agreed when Zelensky visits a
Speaker 3: White House on Monday. Former Defense Committee Chairman Tobias Elwood
Speaker 3: has warned, and the Ukrainian president is being set up
Speaker 3: to fail by his US counterpart, who was himself manipulated
Speaker 3: by Putin during their high profile summit on Friday. Said
Speaker 3: the ex British Army officers probably making a lot of
Speaker 3: money at a defense contractor right now, But he's probably
Speaker 3: somebody's got a lot of blood in his own hands.
Speaker 3: Didn't Putin pull off a fast one. He got the
Speaker 3: red carpet treatment, a handshake with the American president. Well,
Speaker 3: that's big stuff. Isn't it.
Speaker 4: This is I'm sure he'll never wash that hand again.
Speaker 3: This is the kind of stuff these guys are willing.
Speaker 3: I would say, you're willing to die for, but no,
Speaker 3: they're willing to kill you for so they can get
Speaker 3: these kind of honors. But he's really looking at this.
Speaker 3: This is a bureaucrat's dream that he gets a red
Speaker 3: carpet treatment and gets to shake the hand of the president.
Speaker 3: And then somehow Putin walked away without even agreeing to
Speaker 3: a ceasefire, let alone a deal. He said, well, the
Speaker 3: offer on the table that Trump is playing together, there's
Speaker 3: no chance to Lensky can agree to it, because it
Speaker 3: is appeasement, says this warmonger. So we have, as I
Speaker 3: said before, the ego politics where they care nothing about anybody,
Speaker 3: just about their their perceived place in history. I don't
Speaker 3: think history is going to be kind to any of
Speaker 3: these people.
Speaker 4: However, Yeah, they haven't been doing not a good job.
Speaker 4: To put it mildly, Selenski has been a monster, wing
Speaker 4: to sacrifice every last Ukrainian simply to enrich himself.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: It's one of the most blatant pieces of corruption regarding
Speaker 4: war I've seen in my lifetime.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and everybody knew that Ukraine was incredibly corrupt. I
Speaker 3: mean even Bill Gates it was the most corrupt country
Speaker 3: on Earth. But he's not the only one.
Speaker 4: I mean, ranked people would rank the most corrupt countries
Speaker 4: on the planet, like Ukraine would always be right near
Speaker 4: the top.
Speaker 3: That's right. The question is how much of that corruption
Speaker 3: is filtering back to our own congressman, who are cutting
Speaker 3: the checks to Ukraine. You know, That's that's always the
Speaker 3: issue when you look at well, when we come back,
Speaker 3: we're going to take a look at some general news
Speaker 3: things that are happening in terms of the Second Amendment.
Speaker 3: Interesting turn about the Second Amendment in DC now that
Speaker 3: Trump has taking it over. We're also talking about the
Speaker 3: death of the small farm and many other things we
Speaker 3: want to talk about.
Speaker 4: The we've got less comments before we go anywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh yeah, let's take a look at that. Can
Speaker 3: you read the comment? No, I've got the comments over here.
Speaker 3: I think it's a little bit too far away for
Speaker 3: you to read. We're going have to work on some
Speaker 3: of these things here in the new studio. By the way,
Speaker 3: I hope you all like the new studio. I do,
Speaker 3: and I really want to thank Lance and Karen for
Speaker 3: the hard work that they did over the weekend. Travis
Speaker 3: is involved in it as well.
Speaker 4: It was majority Lance and Mom, though plants did so
Speaker 4: much work.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean physical work as well as organizing it.
Speaker 3: And we're really happy with what they've done here. This
Speaker 3: is a room that we're in that is very long
Speaker 3: and narrow, and now we it feels so much larger
Speaker 3: because I'm oriented in a position so that i can
Speaker 3: see the length of the room when I look over
Speaker 3: towards Lance and the booth over there, and so it
Speaker 3: feels much more spacious here. It's a very great design.
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for doing that, and for getting
Speaker 3: all the electronics connected and everything so we can get
Speaker 3: two people in here. Okay, let's see we got a
Speaker 3: new world order is bad nineteen eighty four. Thank you
Speaker 3: very much for the tip.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: Good to see you, David. I'm so happy you're back.
Speaker 3: Been waiting to tell you about how I used to
Speaker 3: be a Trump sucker proxy up until twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: Now I've repurposed my Trump science as targets of the range. Well,
Speaker 3: good for you, Good for you. Yeah, we need to
Speaker 3: hold people accountable for what they do, and I think
Speaker 3: that once you see it, you never go back. That's
Speaker 3: the key thing. DGA, thank you for the tip, says,
Speaker 3: great to see you back. David Bloaton gifted ten subscriptions
Speaker 3: to the David Night's Show. Thank you very much. I
Speaker 3: guess it's on kick Yes, thank you, Yes, and North
Speaker 3: American House EPO. Good to see you there. We're going
Speaker 3: to talk about some transportation issues down in Florida where
Speaker 3: you are, he says. I was pusantly surprised to hear
Speaker 3: William McKinley come up during the discussion last week. It
Speaker 3: reminded me of why Buffalo is one of my favorite cities.
Speaker 3: It gave America two presidents and took one back. It
Speaker 3: also gave us some spicy wings as well, didn't it.
Speaker 4: That's my favorite thing about Buffalo.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, talking about political wings. We have Buffalo wings.
Speaker 3: Nice in the storm. Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 3: Good to see you back. Please pray for our friend
Speaker 3: Mel who lost her son yesterday. I'm so sorry. He
Speaker 3: was only in his twenties. It was very sudden. Well,
Speaker 3: I'm sorry to hear that. You know. I got up
Speaker 3: this morning and looked to see if there was any
Speaker 3: news updates about the war in Ukraine or anything like that,
Speaker 3: and I saw a very touching story on a Drudge
Speaker 3: report that was a mainstream article about a guy who
Speaker 3: lived in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, pretty much close to
Speaker 3: where we used to live. And he was somebody who
Speaker 3: had been who had worked in hospice. They said, usually
Speaker 3: people can only handle hospice for about five years. This
Speaker 3: guy had done it for thirty three. And he was
Speaker 3: a former hardcore atheist, you know, grab you by the
Speaker 3: lapels and tell you there is no God. Now he's
Speaker 3: no longer that. Unfortunately he doesn't know the Lord Jesus Christ,
Speaker 3: but he has come into kind of this spiritual thing.
Speaker 3: But he had some amazing tales about people at the
Speaker 3: end of their lives, and it truly is amazing and
Speaker 3: what we see and we don't hear as much of
Speaker 3: that as we used to because of all the pharmaceuticals
Speaker 3: that they give people at the end of their life.
Speaker 3: I just have to say that there's every reason to
Speaker 3: be filled with hope, and so I certainly hope that
Speaker 3: mel has that hope. I hope that her family knows
Speaker 3: about her child I hope that they trusted in the
Speaker 3: Lord Jesus Christ. That is. You know, there's an interesting
Speaker 3: book by the way. You know, you see these near
Speaker 3: death experiences, and they pretty to be all over the
Speaker 3: place because a lot of them are interpreted by the
Speaker 3: people who have them. And yet there is a guy
Speaker 3: who has a church in Austin. He's a large cher.
Speaker 3: He used to be an engineer, and he started getting
Speaker 3: interested in these near death experiences and he wrote a
Speaker 3: fairly long book that I've read, and he said he
Speaker 3: thought it was a very good evangelical tool that God
Speaker 3: has handed us at this point in time, because he said,
Speaker 3: if you look at these accounts, if you just get
Speaker 3: the people to tell you what happened and not put
Speaker 3: the interpretation that would come from their religion or their culture.
Speaker 3: He goes, it fits perfectly with what the Bible says,
Speaker 3: it doesn't contradict it. And it's a very interesting book
Speaker 3: something to think about, because that is a day that
Speaker 3: is coming for all of us. Brandon Bennett, thank you
Speaker 3: very much, he says, welcome back night, Commander, Well, thank you,
Speaker 3: and DJ says David I voted for Trump in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3: It was like giving a middle finger to Lion Ted
Speaker 3: Lil Marco barr Hanndy, Levine Shapiro and Lindsey Graham. Now
Speaker 3: that's who Maga is. He was this and that he claimed, Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right. You know when you look at at all
Speaker 3: that all these people who are such hardcore Maga, Trump
Speaker 3: has now become the establishment GOP. And you know it
Speaker 3: was again it was an anti establishment move And when
Speaker 3: I looked at it, I thought, well, you know, he
Speaker 3: is so countercultural. Maybe he'll shake things up and he'll
Speaker 3: be good, but he's and it is good to shake
Speaker 3: things up, but he's done it in a very divisive way.
Speaker 3: I think he is the accelerationist at the end of
Speaker 3: this fourth turning that they really want to have in there.
Speaker 3: We're going to talk about that more when we come back.
Speaker 4: One of the main and possibly only reason they just
Speaker 4: like him is he dared to even pay lip service
Speaker 4: to the common American people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: Just even paying lip service to the American people, I
Speaker 4: think is a threat to them. That's part of the
Speaker 4: reason they don't like him, not that he accomplishes anything,
Speaker 4: but just reminding them that, hey, you're a voting block
Speaker 4: that deserves to be served and catered to well.
Speaker 3: He said the right things about a lot of different issues.
Speaker 3: The problem is he did the wrong things. I mean,
Speaker 3: who would have thought when he presents himself as a
Speaker 3: populist for the American people that he'd be capable of
Speaker 3: doing things that he did in twenty twenty. You know,
Speaker 3: when look at the first three or four years of Trump,
Speaker 3: is like, Okay, we've got this tax cut, and it's
Speaker 3: very disappointing. It's like a typical Republican tax cut. It's
Speaker 3: for the big guys and so forth, and hopefully some
Speaker 3: stuff will trickle down, but you know, you can try
Speaker 3: to look at it in this positive light. And a
Speaker 3: lot of other things that were not done in terms
Speaker 3: of sealing the border and things like that, but you
Speaker 3: you know, that's kind of par for the course in politics,
Speaker 3: and I learned a long time ago not to expect
Speaker 3: too much from them. But when he did what he
Speaker 3: did in twenty twenty, there's no way that can be
Speaker 3: explained or forgiven. That was the end of the line,
Speaker 3: locking us down, a kind of medical martial law that
Speaker 3: showed that he was a part of not just the
Speaker 3: deep state in Washington, but a part of the global
Speaker 3: establishment and set himself up as a leader of all
Speaker 3: that developing the vaccine, all the rest of this this
Speaker 3: has been planned and practiced, as I've said many, many,
Speaker 3: many times since nine to eleven. So he showed his
Speaker 3: true colors with a so called pandemic. Karen Carpenter twenty seven,
Speaker 3: Thank you so much, wonderful see you David and Travis.
Speaker 3: Beautiful new studio A day to remember. What a great
Speaker 3: demonstration of teamwork the Night Family is. Well, thank you
Speaker 3: so much. I appreciate that. Guard Goldsmith, good to see
Speaker 3: your guard. Liberty conspiracy David and Travis. He says, thank
Speaker 3: you for the tip. He says, David and Travis had
Speaker 3: created something great. What a combination, beautiful set, great insights.
Speaker 3: Congratulations Hall. Well, I'd say, as I said before, it
Speaker 3: was Karen's design and it was Lance's implementation that made
Speaker 3: all this stuff happen. So I really give the credit
Speaker 3: to them for the studio, and I really do like
Speaker 3: what they've done here.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they did a great job. Yeah again, it was
Speaker 4: almost all them Mom and Lance, so sure, thanks along
Speaker 4: to them.
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, Star Barkley. What they've just said is why
Speaker 3: khrushchef gifted Crimea to Ukraine, the shared culture, the language,
Speaker 3: three hundred years of unity, but not anymore. Yeah, DG eight,
Speaker 3: thank you for the tip, he says, So the global
Speaker 3: spolinical parasites will be gathering in DC. This is all
Speaker 3: a staged show. They don't even respect us enough to
Speaker 3: tell us the truth. I agree. So we don't know
Speaker 3: at this point what they're going to do. There'll probably
Speaker 3: be some entertainment videos will be released about the back
Speaker 3: and forth between them, but again you know what their
Speaker 3: real plans are. We won't know. We'll have to watch
Speaker 3: it unfold. Dougle, thank you very much for the tip,
Speaker 3: he says, so glad to see back in action. David.
Speaker 3: Let's all hit the like button and boost the show.
Speaker 3: Thank you appreciate that very much, and we would also
Speaker 3: appreciate your support. We have many people who support us
Speaker 3: on a regular basis, advertisers and other and you can
Speaker 3: go to the David Knight Show and we have them
Speaker 3: all listed. We'll be talking about the economy and other
Speaker 3: things like that. Will also be talking about farming when
Speaker 3: we come back, and we'll throw in some plugs for
Speaker 3: the people who will help you to get some natural products.
Speaker 3: And help you to get outside the financial system. And
Speaker 3: you can also find out how you can donate to us.
Speaker 3: We have several different ways you can do it, cash,
Speaker 3: app sell, we have a PO box. All of that
Speaker 3: is there at Davidnight dot News. You can see the
Speaker 3: links that are there. Subscribe Star as well. Subscribe Star
Speaker 3: is very important. We don't talk enough about that, but
Speaker 3: that gives us a base of support and we really
Speaker 3: do appreciate the people who have been regular supporters on
Speaker 3: subscribe Star. Thank you very much. We're going to take
Speaker 3: a quick break and we're going to come right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us making sense comment again.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6: If you like the Eagles on a doc, doesn't Away
Speaker 6: the cars and Huey Lewis in the news, they say
Speaker 6: you'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio, download
Speaker 6: our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 7: Your election was rigged because you have mail in voting,
Speaker 7: he said, mail in voting every election. He said, no
Speaker 7: country has mail in voting. It's impossible to have mail
Speaker 7: in voting and have honest elections.
Speaker 2: Dude, did the mail un voting bout twenty twenty?
Speaker 3: He said? You were you were president much you started that.
Speaker 7: That's how he got it. He said, And if you
Speaker 7: would have won, we wouldn't have had a war. You'd
Speaker 7: have all these millions of people alive now instead of dead.
Speaker 7: And he said, and you lost it because of mail
Speaker 7: in voting. It was a rigged election. But male in voting, Sean,
Speaker 7: it's the politicians. I think I'm going to make it
Speaker 7: a big I know. The answer is that Jimmy Carter
Speaker 7: years ago, along with Scoop Jackson and some others, they
Speaker 7: had a committee, respected people, good committee. Jimmy Carter, good guy,
Speaker 7: there is a good man. And the conclusion was, you
Speaker 7: can't have mail in voting. We have mail in voting.
Speaker 7: It's so dishonest. They send stuff. Some people get seven ballots.
Speaker 7: Look at California with a horrible governor they have. There's
Speaker 7: one of the worst governors in the history.
Speaker 5: He's in competent. There isn't al what he's doing.
Speaker 7: He sounded out like thirty eight million ballots. Some people
Speaker 7: get five, six, seven. But Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said
Speaker 7: you can't have an honest election with mail in voting.
Speaker 7: And he said, there's not a country in the world
Speaker 7: that uses it now. Oh, I would love to see
Speaker 7: election reform.
Speaker 2: We have to do it.
Speaker 7: I don't know why we're not doing it.
Speaker 3: I don't know why you did it. You're the one
Speaker 3: who we suppose, but.
Speaker 2: Not strongly enough.
Speaker 7: I mean, they gotta want its strong because it can't
Speaker 7: be it can't be honest.
Speaker 3: It goes through a postman.
Speaker 7: It goes through somebody else, somebody else, somebody. You know,
Speaker 7: when you go to a really well runched voting ruth,
Speaker 7: you go in, you have to hand a card, a
Speaker 7: picture or this or that. You don't have everything perfectly.
Speaker 7: You get sent back or get it. It's really it's
Speaker 7: very hard to do something fraudulent with a vote, paper bowl,
Speaker 7: mail in voting. It's it's they give you boxes of stuff.
Speaker 7: You have no idea where they came from. This mail
Speaker 7: in voting. You can't have a great democracy republic, you
Speaker 7: can't have it. Well, maybe that's why.
Speaker 4: We're gonna end up with the communist.
Speaker 3: Mayor in New York. I don't know.
Speaker 7: He probably is very happy with mail in both. But
Speaker 7: you can't have a great democracy with mail in voting.
Speaker 3: I have no doubt that Putin told them about I
Speaker 3: have no doubt that Putin knows exactly what Trump wants
Speaker 3: to hear and flattered him to the his degree, who
Speaker 3: knew that this is going to be a problem. Yeah, well,
Speaker 3: you know, in twenty sixteen, I talked a great deal
Speaker 3: about the issues that we knew at that time with
Speaker 3: electronic voting. And it wasn't something that just happened in
Speaker 3: twenty sixteen. It had been around for a long time.
Speaker 3: I'd shown videos of people coming in from a computer
Speaker 3: science class. A guy comes in with a couple of
Speaker 3: students and they take over and rig a voting machine
Speaker 3: very quickly and easily to give them whatever results that
Speaker 3: they wanted. We also had local questions about what was
Speaker 3: happening in Texas, and we had a person who was
Speaker 3: running for office and was trying to get the records
Speaker 3: and found out that the state Board of Elections there
Speaker 3: in Texas, run by a guy who used to work
Speaker 3: for the Rose Law firms that sound familiar, That's where
Speaker 3: Clinton was and hung out, was brought in by Republican
Speaker 3: Rick Perry in order to in order to run the
Speaker 3: elections there. And this is before you even started thinking
Speaker 3: the loose enagenics. I don't know what the guy was thinking, anyway,
Speaker 3: we know the's just part of the system. But you know,
Speaker 3: I went to talk to that guy and he agreed
Speaker 3: to the interview. We were down in the in the
Speaker 3: foyer there and as he starts to come down the steps,
Speaker 3: he sees me and he goes, oh, not doing that.
Speaker 3: He goes back up. But anyway, I said, the problem
Speaker 3: was going to be electronic voting because this guy had,
Speaker 3: since he became the head of the Board of Elections,
Speaker 3: he had told every one of the counties to ignore
Speaker 3: the Texas Constitution that says that they have to keep
Speaker 3: a record of all these electronic votes. He said, destroy
Speaker 3: all that after the election. And that's why this person
Speaker 3: who was running for local office was part of her lawsuit.
Speaker 3: She couldn't get discovery because everything had been wiped clean
Speaker 3: memory hold. So I said in twenty sixteen, I said,
Speaker 3: the next election in twenty twenty is going to be
Speaker 3: a hacking contest between the Democrats and Republicans because they're
Speaker 3: both into this. They both rig it. I was wrong,
Speaker 3: and I had to say in twenty twenty I was wrong.
Speaker 3: I said, no, now it's going to be this mail
Speaker 3: in stuff. And everybody knew that, even Bill Barr said it.
Speaker 3: Remember that he even said this is going to be
Speaker 3: completely rigged, and it was Trump who did it with
Speaker 3: this phony pandemic, and now he claims that it was
Speaker 3: done to him. Such a helpless little victim, isn't he.
Speaker 4: He locks down the entire country, destroys your business, Trump
Speaker 4: most affected. This is no how could this happen? You
Speaker 4: did it, sir, You're the one that allowed it to happen.
Speaker 3: And I believe I said at the time, and I
Speaker 3: still believe it. I think he's part of the globalist elite.
Speaker 3: I think that this is a deliberate tag team to
Speaker 3: turn this over to Biden so he could escalate it
Speaker 3: with mandates and things like that, and they could distance
Speaker 3: themselves from the vaccine mandates that the vacs that Trump
Speaker 3: is still so proud of as mRNA vaccination. I think
Speaker 3: it was a globalist tag team things. This professional wrestling
Speaker 3: taken to a professional level. It really is, and I
Speaker 3: think that he is there as the accelerationists. So with
Speaker 3: all that as a background, I don't really know what's
Speaker 3: going to happen with the Ukraine war. I hope the
Speaker 3: killing stops, is all I'll say. But I don't trust
Speaker 3: any of these people. Now he claims he was a
Speaker 3: victim even though he was the president, and I think
Speaker 3: completely connulled.
Speaker 4: Only there was somebody with enough power to have done something,
Speaker 4: but only there was somebody that wielded executive authority that
Speaker 4: could have changed things.
Speaker 3: And then we look at another difference between Trump version
Speaker 3: one and Trump version two. It's like two different people. Right,
Speaker 3: He's reinvented himself. So now he's taking over DC, threatening
Speaker 3: to takeover other cities as well, and kind of a
Speaker 3: boil the frog's martial law. And as part of what
Speaker 3: he's done in DC, you have the maga media and
Speaker 3: the maga Trump Sucker proxy media is out there cheering
Speaker 3: what he's done because now he's making it easier for
Speaker 3: people to get concealed carry in d C. D C
Speaker 3: has fought anybody being able to protect themselves. They fought
Speaker 3: that tooth and nail for the longest period of time.
Speaker 3: Remember the Heller decision at the Supreme Court. That was
Speaker 3: a police officer, Heller, who was prevented from carrying when
Speaker 3: he was off duty, and he sued and won. The
Speaker 3: Supreme Court said, no, this is an individual right. Well,
Speaker 3: of course, it's an individual right everything. You know. The
Speaker 3: last couple of amendments, ninth and tenth Amendment is talking
Speaker 3: about the fact that the government, the federal government should
Speaker 3: not interpret various passages is an expansive way, as they
Speaker 3: have done with a welfare clause and supremacy clause and
Speaker 3: things like that. You don't have any powerless it's explicitly
Speaker 3: given to you. But all the rest of the amendments,
Speaker 3: the other eight are all about individual liberties, and so
Speaker 3: of course the Second Amendment is about that. But now
Speaker 3: he is this is headline from the Gateway Pundit. Trump
Speaker 3: is slashing wait time from months to days amid the
Speaker 3: crime crackdown. So now we're supposed to believe that Trump
Speaker 3: is pro Second Amendment. The guy who set a precedent
Speaker 3: of gun control by executive order one that was Laala Harris.
Speaker 3: As dumb as she is, she immediately jumped on that
Speaker 3: and said, I'll give them one hundred days to my
Speaker 3: gun control and if they don't do it, I'll do
Speaker 3: it by executive order. That was when she was running
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty, and that campaign didn't last very long.
Speaker 3: Either She's good for about one hundred days one way
Speaker 3: or the other.
Speaker 4: That's all you can stand her for.
Speaker 3: Right, But so so Trump, who was the first president
Speaker 3: ever to do gun control by executive order, to say
Speaker 3: take the guns and do the due process later. You know,
Speaker 3: now he is a champion of gun rights. According to
Speaker 3: the Maga Press, he doesn't care enough about the Constitution, folks,
Speaker 3: to even bother to read it. He's just like Biden,
Speaker 3: and Biden talks about the bill wrights. You know. The thing,
Speaker 3: you know, Trump is the same way with the Constitution.
Speaker 3: He says, yeah, it's this, And of course he's in
Speaker 3: his office and I don't know if you played that
Speaker 3: video or not, but he points to the Constitution he's
Speaker 3: got pressed there and he says, and then we have
Speaker 3: our wonderful, wonderful Constitution. What a great thing that is.
Speaker 3: And he says, it just brought us all together, you know.
Speaker 3: And it's like, well, no, it's the principles that are
Speaker 3: in there you have completely ignored. But this is what
Speaker 3: you have when you've got somebody who doesn't have a foundation,
Speaker 3: who doesn't have principles. He's like a ship without a rudder.
Speaker 3: And so he can be doing gun control by executive
Speaker 3: or the next day he is out taking over a
Speaker 3: city under martial law and then saying, and now we're
Speaker 3: going to get rid of some of the paperwork for
Speaker 3: gun carrying. It's just he's all over the place. It's amazing.
Speaker 3: He's vacillating, just like he does with the tariffs, and
Speaker 3: the magaminions are cheering him on the Trump administration. Federal
Speaker 3: takeover Washington, d C. Is making the streets safe and
Speaker 3: empowering law abiding citizens. You know, this has always been
Speaker 3: well the global slite have said, people like Kenry Kissinger.
Speaker 3: He said, we're going to arrange things that people are
Speaker 3: begging for totalitarian government, and so you know, they can
Speaker 3: make things bad enough that people will beg for a
Speaker 3: strong man dictator to take over everything and throughout the
Speaker 3: rule of law. That is the pattern that ise here.
Speaker 3: Just wait, Gateway pundit, until the Democrats do what Donnie
Speaker 3: is doing right now, and see how much you like
Speaker 3: martial law and throwing out the constitution and the rule
Speaker 3: of law and letting law enforcement, so called law enforcement,
Speaker 3: do whatever they want. You know, when you don't care
Speaker 3: about the laws, what does law enforcement means? Nothing but
Speaker 3: force at that point in time, so Gateway Pundit said,
Speaker 3: Trump announced on Monday, they's taking federal control of d
Speaker 3: c's Metropolitan Police Department, authorizing the use of National Guard
Speaker 3: troops to solve the quote public safety emergency unquote in
Speaker 3: the nation's capital. Now the two sides are coming back
Speaker 3: and forth, Travis, and they're saying, well, you know, the
Speaker 3: Democrats say crime is down by thirty percent or whatever. Yeah, statistics,
Speaker 3: I don't believe any government statistics. Washington, d C is
Speaker 3: a mess.
Speaker 4: They've actually changed the way they report crimes and they're
Speaker 4: not actually sending the reports in on certain specific types
Speaker 4: of crimes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, not surprise. That's exactly the way I expect them
Speaker 3: to manipulate this stuff. And so all the statistics can
Speaker 3: be manipulated. But the reality is that you can't trust
Speaker 3: either side on this, and we do not want to
Speaker 3: have the federal government federalizing police. This is something that
Speaker 3: John Bird Society got right when I was a child.
Speaker 3: They were talking about do not support your local sheriff,
Speaker 3: right became a slogan as opposed to stop federal policing.
Speaker 3: This is a long term move that has been going
Speaker 3: on now my entire life, and now it is really
Speaker 3: starting to come to a head. And Trump has the
Speaker 3: audacity to threaten other cities, not just Washington, d C.
Speaker 3: So I just say, you know, wait until you get
Speaker 3: somebody like Hillary Clinton in and wait till you see
Speaker 3: when she takes over law enforcement, has she uses it,
Speaker 3: it'll be something like what we see in the UK
Speaker 3: happening right now. And he has the audacity to call
Speaker 3: liberation day in DC. Yeah, liberation from the rule of
Speaker 3: law in the constitution. That's what he liberated us from.
Speaker 3: Liberated himself, liberated the people that are there. They don't
Speaker 3: have to show their face, they don't have to give ID.
Speaker 3: We got masked men. There was an article in San Bernardino.
Speaker 3: It just came out about a family that was in
Speaker 3: a truck and evidently they were Hispanic and so they
Speaker 3: were pulled over by ice because they see a bunch
Speaker 3: of Hispanics in a truck that figure could get illegals.
Speaker 3: But these people said, we want to see your ID.
Speaker 3: You got a warrant for that. You know, you're wearing
Speaker 3: a mask and all the rest of this stuff. And
Speaker 3: he claimed that t're federal agents, but they were videotaping
Speaker 3: the thing and they told them to get out of
Speaker 3: the car. They refused to get out of the car.
Speaker 3: So as you can see the videotape, the cops, so
Speaker 3: called quat cops quote unquote, started smashing the windows of
Speaker 3: the truck, at which point the driver stepped on the
Speaker 3: gas to get out of there. And they said, oh,
Speaker 3: and you hit two of us, but nobody was taken
Speaker 3: to the hospital. Then the other cops started shooting the car,
Speaker 3: shot the car up, but they got away and something.
Speaker 3: They called up the local police and they went to
Speaker 3: their house. The only person that was arrested was the
Speaker 3: driver who who sped up and run away from the stop.
Speaker 3: Now what does that tell you, Travis about the when
Speaker 3: or not these people were illegals or not. Do you
Speaker 3: think that they would have taken them into custody if
Speaker 3: they were illegals?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think that might give you a clue into things.
Speaker 4: These people have not been shy about just rounding people
Speaker 4: up and shipping them off immediately under the slightest pretense.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so, I mean, you know, they would have arrested
Speaker 3: these people. Ice was itching to get these people, but
Speaker 3: evidently they were bona fide, Yeah they say in the
Speaker 3: film the film, Yeah, yeah, we laugh about that all
Speaker 3: the time. Bonefy They got my papers in. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: law enforcement has been liberated to do as they please.
Speaker 3: Isn't that great? Aren't you about that?
Speaker 4: This was another scenario where whether they have the right
Speaker 4: to do something to you, they definitely have the force
Speaker 4: to do something to you.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, it's not about right and wrong. It's not
Speaker 3: about the real law. It's just about brute force and
Speaker 3: what they.
Speaker 4: Can do generally, once the cop tells you, you know,
Speaker 4: step out of the car. If you do anything but comply,
Speaker 4: you are going to end up worse off. You can
Speaker 4: fight them in court later on potentially get a judgment,
Speaker 4: but you have to be alive to do that.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: They will take any opportunity, any excuse they can to
Speaker 4: use excessive force, and sometimes the most excessive force possible,
Speaker 4: which is straight to lethal.
Speaker 3: That's not the time to have a government confrontation. There
Speaker 3: there are times to do it in times to not
Speaker 3: do it.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 4: That makes you don't want to be a martyr for
Speaker 4: this kind of thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, as much as it depends upon you be at
Speaker 3: peace with all police officers in the Bible somewhere anyway.
Speaker 3: So let's take a look at how the small farm
Speaker 3: is getting liberated. The death of the small farm is
Speaker 3: the death of rural America. Well, you know what they
Speaker 3: really need is protection from the US government. It's big
Speaker 3: AG and it's the USDA and big pharma that are
Speaker 3: the problem, big chemicals. And it's kind of interesting to
Speaker 3: see how RFK Jr. Has taken a pass now on pesticides,
Speaker 3: because pesticide is something that he always was focused on.
Speaker 3: And now there's a big move in Washington to grant
Speaker 3: legal immunity to UH. I guess we could call him
Speaker 3: big Pests.
Speaker 4: I mentioned this on it and I think I told you.
Speaker 4: But when we my wife and I were driving down
Speaker 4: to Texas this last time, this giant bilber on the
Speaker 4: side of the road I saw stand up for glyphisate.
Speaker 4: Contact your senator now or something. Just how who is
Speaker 4: doing this?
Speaker 3: He was reading that.
Speaker 4: Billboard like, you know what, Yeah, we need more pesticides.
Speaker 3: We need more glacis in our food. I just don't
Speaker 3: have enough. But yeah, they're now angling for the kind
Speaker 3: of legal immunity that was given to the pharmaceutical companies
Speaker 3: a while back, and RFK Junior has now gone silent
Speaker 3: on that. And so it's big AG, It's the USDA.
Speaker 4: And it's big pest, big pest if.
Speaker 3: You roll it all together. So they're destroying small communities
Speaker 3: as we move more and more toward the go big
Speaker 3: or go home. This is from the Epic Times model,
Speaker 3: thousands of acres of the same monocrop managed by one
Speaker 3: or two people on a tractor that is spraying chemicals.
Speaker 3: Of course, they're not even driving a tractor. They've got
Speaker 3: it on self driving using GPS.
Speaker 4: And they don't own the tractor. John dr A's the tractor.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a twenty first century version of sharecropping where
Speaker 3: you don't get a share, all the shares go to
Speaker 3: the share stakeholders. Right. What used to be twenty or
Speaker 3: thirty small farms, each with a household and a family
Speaker 3: that supports the local restaurant, gas station, feed store, and
Speaker 3: veterinarian who serviced a few counties is now being replaced
Speaker 3: by a single, sprawling operation with no animals, no neighbors,
Speaker 3: and no community, just chemicals and soon robots. Well, this
Speaker 3: reminds me of it. We mentioned this the movie Silent
Speaker 3: Running Bruce derned years and years ago. It's kind of
Speaker 3: interesting because it was the special effects for the spaceships
Speaker 3: were done by the guy who not long after that
Speaker 3: did Star Wars and it was kind of done with
Speaker 3: models and things like that. They didn't have computer generated
Speaker 3: images at the time, but in that it was kind
Speaker 3: of all inspired by kind of eco fanaticism and fear
Speaker 3: mongering that you know, dirty mankind was killing all the
Speaker 3: forests and everything, so it was a last digit ditch effort.
Speaker 3: What they did was they took some of the forests
Speaker 3: and other things like that and put them on large
Speaker 3: spaceships with big glass enclosures and I think so they
Speaker 3: could get sunlight and went out into space to kind
Speaker 3: of preserve them until they could get the world cleaned
Speaker 3: up enough that they could bring back these things. And
Speaker 3: Silent Running is about Bruce Dern who has kind of
Speaker 3: this hippie astronaut who goes native. He gets a call
Speaker 3: he is the sole person looking after this big forest
Speaker 3: that is there, and he's got some of these little
Speaker 3: robots that are real cute. They kind of waddle around
Speaker 3: like ducks. And that's what brought it up because you
Speaker 3: had the Nvidia CEO had a presentation showing had that
Speaker 3: little robot come out that was from Disney.
Speaker 5: And that's the video on the deck yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, go ahead and played that so people can see
Speaker 3: the little robot. I almost played.
Speaker 4: It's going to be so cute when it waddles up
Speaker 4: with the death ray and vaporizes you.
Speaker 8: Joys are different than other robots I tested, designed and
Speaker 8: train and by Disney to be cute, and that is
Speaker 8: a surprisingly big deal for the future of robotics. These
Speaker 8: droids aren't autonomous. They're operated using this controller, but I'm
Speaker 8: not telling it exactly how to do that. The way
Speaker 8: that it responds comes from its training. Using ducklings as inspiration,
Speaker 8: the engineers created a bunch of animations that told these
Speaker 8: robots how to walk or jump, board dance. Then they
Speaker 8: put digital versions of the robot into a simulation where
Speaker 8: they're rewarded for performing those movements and sticking as close
Speaker 8: as possible to the original animations. After the robots get
Speaker 8: tons of reps in the digital world, they upload the
Speaker 8: training to real prototypes, and finally they're ready to go
Speaker 8: out into the real world to see more of Disney's
Speaker 8: coolest texts.
Speaker 9: Those things are vicious, yeah, so yeah, and when you
Speaker 9: look at that, it is those things have much more
Speaker 9: rapid movement than the droids in that movie Day, because
Speaker 9: the droids in that movie were.
Speaker 3: Actually midgets of wearing a box and you know, their
Speaker 3: feet were in there, but they were cute. And so,
Speaker 3: to spoil the plot for you, that he gets this
Speaker 3: call from the president and it's like, you know, we
Speaker 3: can't afford to pay for these things anymore. I don't
Speaker 3: know where they were saying the paychecks. You know, he's
Speaker 3: up there, and so we were checks in the mail.
Speaker 3: He's something I have deliveries something or anyway, So he
Speaker 3: tells them to blow up all these different ones, and
Speaker 3: all the other people are doing it, but he determines
Speaker 3: that he's going to go silent and he's going to
Speaker 3: run for it because he's going to save the forests.
Speaker 3: And you know, they got John Baiez singing and all
Speaker 3: the rest of that stuff. But I liked the movie.
Speaker 5: Was really bad, by the way. Yeah, he tried to
Speaker 5: make us watch it at some point.
Speaker 3: I try to make you guys watch it because I
Speaker 3: remembered I liked it when I first saw it. I thought,
Speaker 3: you know, I could see through all the eco nonsense
Speaker 3: that was there. But anyway, that's probably what they want
Speaker 3: on the family farm. You know, they want one Bruce
Speaker 3: Dern and a bunch of robots and a bunch of chemicals,
Speaker 3: and that's it. You know, you take the food that
Speaker 3: they offer you. Over the past decade, about one hundred
Speaker 3: and forty thousand US farms have vanished. And that's not
Speaker 3: just those farms that have that collapsed, it's also the
Speaker 3: entire ecosystem that they support. All the small businesses in town, diners,
Speaker 3: auction barns, schools, vets, feed stores, all of them felt
Speaker 3: the blow. I wonder how much of that happened Travis
Speaker 3: during twenty twenty when Trump blocked everything down. I mean,
Speaker 3: it was main street America that took the big hit
Speaker 3: from his lockdowns. Wall Street didn't field at all.
Speaker 4: Hey, most of these farms don't operate on huge profit margins.
Speaker 4: They're generally just making it.
Speaker 3: If they are. Yeah, the economic destruction radiates outward. Every
Speaker 3: boarded up business is a ripple from a missing farm.
Speaker 3: Despite this, small farms are often treated as quaint and
Speaker 3: efficient and economically irrelevant in the modern food system, but
Speaker 3: numbers tell us a different story. Globally, farms that are
Speaker 3: under two hectares about five acres produce about thirty to
Speaker 3: thirty four percent of the world's food while they use
Speaker 3: only twenty four percent of agricultural land. In other words,
Speaker 3: that's efficiency.
Speaker 4: Just to break in with a story, I took my
Speaker 4: wife out for her birthday dinner on Saturday, and we
Speaker 4: have this restaurant that's nearby that's nice. We like to
Speaker 4: go to it, and basically everything they serve on the
Speaker 4: menu is locally sourced from local farms, everything. And you
Speaker 4: can't have that sort of relationship. You can't know where
Speaker 4: it's coming from if you're getting it from you know, whatever,
Speaker 4: major corporation. But they're able to sit down and say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 4: actually it's this guy. He lives, you know, a few
Speaker 4: miles down the road. Him and his family come in
Speaker 4: and they drop off our produce. He's got, you know,
Speaker 4: three kids. You know, they're telling us this story about where.
Speaker 3: The it's a community. Yeah that's right, you know.
Speaker 4: Oh he quit his job and he grows mushrooms full
Speaker 4: time now and his kids help him win the farm.
Speaker 3: It's like, oh wow, I think that's one of the
Speaker 3: best career opportunities to out there. I would say, don't
Speaker 3: learn to code, learn to grow, because you're gonna have
Speaker 3: to feed yourself and you may be able to make
Speaker 3: a living feeding other people as well. You know, that's
Speaker 3: really important because I just saw another article about how
Speaker 3: restaurants are really jumping into synthetic salmon now in a
Speaker 3: big way, you know, to make it look like it's real.
Speaker 3: You know, you know when you're going to restaurant like that,
Speaker 3: that you're getting real food.
Speaker 4: There's a really big bodybuilding channel on YouTube and it's
Speaker 4: hosted by a guy named Jeff Nippard. He does a
Speaker 4: very science based breakdown of bodybuilding stuff, and recently he tweeted,
Speaker 4: as soon as you know synthetic meat becomes where it
Speaker 4: tastes like real meat, that's all I'm gonna eat. That's
Speaker 4: all I'm doing. And it's just I cannot think of
Speaker 4: anything more horrifying than eating this.
Speaker 3: A lot of them bodybuilders are not really health aware.
Speaker 4: Now, this guy prides himself on being all natural. He
Speaker 4: says he doesn't take steroids and all that stuff. I
Speaker 4: can't say one way or the other, but most of
Speaker 4: these bodybuilders, like you said, they're taking steroids, they are
Speaker 4: monumentally unhealthy.
Speaker 3: Or they're abusing things like creatine or something. Not to
Speaker 3: say that creatine is inherently bad. But you know, you
Speaker 3: can abuse anything, right.
Speaker 4: And taking massive doses of all kinds of different steroids,
Speaker 4: or even just taking too much testosterone. Yeah, he becomes
Speaker 4: extremely unhealthy and just carrying around that level of mass
Speaker 4: is bad for your heart. It's the same, well it's
Speaker 4: not quite the same, but it's very similar to us
Speaker 4: if you were just massively obese.
Speaker 3: Yeah. One of our friends years ago was heavily into
Speaker 3: bodybuilding and then he had a back injury and he
Speaker 3: couldn't work out, and it all turned to fat. And
Speaker 3: that was one of the things I've remember. Tied helped that.
Speaker 3: We interviewed the lumberjack in Washington State who had lost
Speaker 3: his retirement. His retirement was the force that he had
Speaker 3: set aside for his retirement, and the negligence and mismanagement
Speaker 3: of the federal government had caused a force a wildfire
Speaker 3: to go out of control and destroyed his land.
Speaker 4: It literally went up in smoke.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that was one of the things he was saying.
Speaker 3: He said, you know, lumberjacks don't live that long. He said,
Speaker 3: we worked so hard and we have so much muscle.
Speaker 3: When we stopped working, it all just goes to fat.
Speaker 3: And you really takes out.
Speaker 4: Part of it is just you. When you're working very hard,
Speaker 4: you're burning a lot of calories. You used to being
Speaker 4: able to eat a certain way, like, oh man, i
Speaker 4: can eat as much junk food as I want. Since
Speaker 4: I'm burning this many calories, it doesn't matter. I'm chopping
Speaker 4: down trees all day. I can afford to eat, you know,
Speaker 4: twinkies and ding dongs all day long. And then you
Speaker 4: stop doing that and you're still eating twinkies and ding
Speaker 4: dongs and you can't afford that anymore.
Speaker 3: That's right. Well, you know, as they were saying, you know,
Speaker 3: when you look at this, small farms provide a lot
Speaker 3: of jobs, but they're also efficient in terms of land use,
Speaker 3: in terms of resources and other things. And that's really
Speaker 3: what this article is about. It shows the bad approach,
Speaker 3: but also shows more positive approaches. They were saying, if
Speaker 3: they look at five about five acres, they produce about
Speaker 3: thirty to thirty four percent of the world's food while
Speaker 3: using only about twenty four percent of the land. So
Speaker 3: if you expand that to about twelve acres, then it
Speaker 3: goes to over fifty percent of the world's food, and
Speaker 3: said small farms matter because they produce food where it's eaten,
Speaker 3: keep being supply chains short and resilient, and keeping the
Speaker 3: food fresh. That was one of the things we did
Speaker 3: back in the day when we were competing in and
Speaker 3: video contests. We did a thing about local wares. You know,
Speaker 3: people eating locally and you know, finding food locally. We
Speaker 3: used to do that, used to go up to Virginia
Speaker 3: and pick apples.
Speaker 4: And carter mountain and apple or anyone is curious.
Speaker 3: That was really a nice experience. We really love that
Speaker 3: the eggs from down the road, the beef from the
Speaker 3: rancher that you know by name, employee, more people per acre,
Speaker 3: and they keep the product profits circulating locally. While most
Speaker 3: of the farms we've lost or small family operations. A
Speaker 3: fight to save rural America isn't just about acreage. It's
Speaker 3: also really about the approach to all of this. It's
Speaker 3: not the size of the farm that determines the value
Speaker 3: to a community, but the farming practices that it uses
Speaker 3: and the relationships that it sustains. And so they have
Speaker 3: a story about a very successful, very large farm in
Speaker 3: Georgia that has done just that, twelve hundred and fifty acres.
Speaker 3: Will Harris has done this at a farm he calls
Speaker 3: white Oak Pastures in Bluffton, Georgia. His family has had
Speaker 3: that since right after the Civil War eighteen sixty six.
Speaker 3: In the mid nineties, he made a radical break from
Speaker 3: industrial agriculture. He replaced chemical inputs and confinement feeding with
Speaker 3: rotational grazing, diversified livestock, and on site USDA inspected processing facilities.
Speaker 3: White Oak Pastures is now one of the only farms
Speaker 3: in the country with separate abatoars for red meat and poultry.
Speaker 3: To make this transformation, he took a big risk. He
Speaker 3: borrowed seven and a half million dollars against the family land.
Speaker 3: In other words, he literally bet the family farm on this,
Speaker 3: but it paid off. He did this back in two
Speaker 3: thousand and eight and now his farm is zero waste,
Speaker 3: closed loop agricultural ecosis to them, where nothing goes to
Speaker 3: waste and grass fed meats, eggs, organic vegetables and byproducts
Speaker 3: like hides are turned into artisan goods and compost. His
Speaker 3: regenerative practices have rebuilt topsoil, captured carbon, and sparked a
Speaker 3: local economic revival. If these people were genuine about all
Speaker 3: of the environmental and climate issues that they have, they
Speaker 3: would be pushing for something like this, but they're not
Speaker 3: because they're using it as mcguffin, to gain control, to
Speaker 3: impoverish and to enslave us. That's their real purpose.
Speaker 4: And all this stuff you can see how they hate
Speaker 4: farmers matter where theyre. We talked about earlier. Was it
Speaker 4: the Dutch guy in the Netherlands, Mark Ruda, Yeah, who
Speaker 4: all he wanted to do was crush the small farms.
Speaker 3: And he was allied with Bill Gates. You know, Bill
Speaker 3: Gates is going.
Speaker 4: To be players everywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's gonna, you know, do the do the food
Speaker 3: with lab meat. And then Mark Rude had married into
Speaker 3: a family that was very very large, very very large corporation.
Speaker 3: It was about food distribution. So they were going to
Speaker 3: grow in a lab the food and then monopolize the distribution.
Speaker 3: That was what it was all about. None of it
Speaker 3: was never about the environment. Today, the employee about one
Speaker 3: hundred and eighty people at White Oak Pastures, making it
Speaker 3: the county's largest private employer. What was once a dying
Speaker 3: ghost town now has a general store, a restaurant, lodging
Speaker 3: and an event center. Because one man chose to bet
Speaker 3: everything on a different way forward. His example proves that
Speaker 3: it's not scale but matters. It's the soil health, the
Speaker 3: humane treatment of animals, the jobs created, and the way
Speaker 3: the farm integrates into the life of the town. And
Speaker 3: you know, Travis, remember I interviewed that guy. He's in
Speaker 3: America and he gives classes to people about how to
Speaker 3: do more natural farming. And he was inspired by a
Speaker 3: farmer from previously Rhodesia that became Zimbabwe when the Marxist
Speaker 3: took it over, and he said some of the farmers
Speaker 3: fought them, he said they died. Many of them just
Speaker 3: decided to pack up and leave. This guy was a
Speaker 3: Christian and he decided that he would stay and show
Speaker 3: them how to run the farms because the Marxists and
Speaker 3: their mob when they took it over, they didn't have
Speaker 3: a clue how to grow food. This guy did, and
Speaker 3: he had a natural way to farm that he had
Speaker 3: already developed. He was not getting the kind of yuels
Speaker 3: that he needed. It was actually killing his farm to
Speaker 3: use these new petrochemicals and these contemporary agricultural techniques. And
Speaker 3: as a Christian, he just asked God, he said, show
Speaker 3: me a way to do this, and he said, God
Speaker 3: brought to his mind that in a natural way. He
Speaker 3: looked into the forest and he said, look at this
Speaker 3: as Africa. Things are just growing everywhere. Why is it
Speaker 3: on my farm with all the care that I'm putting
Speaker 3: into this, all the work, and all the expensive chemicals.
Speaker 3: Why why aren't the plants that I'm trying to grow prospering.
Speaker 3: Everything else around here is prospering. And so it was
Speaker 3: kind of a more of a natural approach that he
Speaker 3: took to it, and he was extremely successful, and he
Speaker 3: decided that he would stay. And even though they took
Speaker 3: his farm away from him, as a Christian, you know,
Speaker 3: he basically not only gave him his shirt, but he
Speaker 3: gave him his cloak also, as christ said, he showed
Speaker 3: them how to farm, and he used it as an
Speaker 3: opportunity to give them the Gospel and to basically defaing
Speaker 3: these Marxists. Right, these people want to kill you. You turned
Speaker 3: them into Christians. That's the way you defeat Marxism. And
Speaker 3: so this guy in America got to know him and
Speaker 3: he's showing people how to do that in America. Look, folks,
Speaker 3: we can rebuild from the ground up. We really can.
Speaker 3: And what it takes is a regard for your fellow
Speaker 3: man and other things. We could even see that in
Speaker 3: somebody like Henry Ford, who is not a model of
Speaker 3: a Christian sacrifice, but he knew that he wanted to
Speaker 3: have cars that his employees goodbuye Right, But do you
Speaker 3: see that with Musk or with Bezos or any of
Speaker 3: these people.
Speaker 4: Yeah, how many of his employees do you think are
Speaker 4: going to get to go to Mars?
Speaker 3: How much?
Speaker 4: How expensive is that flight going to be?
Speaker 3: Or can they afford to buy Tesla? You know, they
Speaker 3: really don't care. Or when you look at the robots, right,
Speaker 3: they want to cut the throat of their employees. They
Speaker 3: don't want to lift them up, and they're going to
Speaker 3: cut our throats with robotics. That's the way they're going
Speaker 3: to do this. So, as they said, the wake up
Speaker 3: calls already ringing, boarded up main street, closed auction barns,
Speaker 3: veterinarians having to re locate to cities, feed stores, shuttered schools.
Speaker 3: Shrinking food has been a weapon in almost every war
Speaker 3: in history. Without control over our food supply, we surrender
Speaker 3: control over our future. And of course, when we were
Speaker 3: talking about Ukraine earlier, it's probably one of the best
Speaker 3: best known examples of food as a weapon in the Holomodore,
Speaker 3: but of course it's being used in God's and now
Speaker 3: as well. This is what Trump accelerated in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: And when I say, you know, what is it that
Speaker 3: government can do? Government can go away. It's the USDA
Speaker 3: that is stopping people from being able to do the
Speaker 3: food processing on their own farms. And it's the USDA,
Speaker 3: especially under Trump. Brooke Rollins personally approved the mr Anda
Speaker 3: vaccine for chickens. So now you get industrially produced chickens.
Speaker 3: You get it from chickens that have been vaccinated with mRNA.
Speaker 3: This is the alliance between the big pests as we
Speaker 3: call them. Meanwhile, you have the Prime Act is now
Speaker 3: coming up again. This is something that in the past
Speaker 3: was initiated by Thomas Massey, if you remember, in response
Speaker 3: to the USDA raids against the Pennsylvania Amish farmer, and
Speaker 3: he put out the Prime Act last year. Now they
Speaker 3: don't give him credit for this. On the conservative press,
Speaker 3: they want to cheer Marshall Blackburn and good for her.
Speaker 3: She finally introduced a good bill after many many very
Speaker 3: bad bills. She introduced the Genius Act. She's introduced This
Speaker 3: was it Kosha Cosa Cosa, Yeah, Coosa to sneak in
Speaker 3: ID in order to use the Internet in the name
Speaker 3: of protecting children. So she's all about digital ID everywhere,
Speaker 3: especially in the financial system. But here she's working with
Speaker 3: Angus King and Rand Paul. These three senators introduced last Thursday.
Speaker 4: A guy named Angus working on the Prime Prime Act
Speaker 4: is pretty good.
Speaker 3: Better watch his back, right. So anyway, they've introduced the
Speaker 3: Prime Act, and I guess I'm not ribbing about that.
Speaker 3: The Act attempts to give stakes the power to allow
Speaker 3: interest state distribution of custom slaughtered meat to consumers, restaurants
Speaker 3: and grocery stores. Well, it's not just the interstate distribution.
Speaker 3: The USDA was coming in and shutting this down even
Speaker 3: if it was within the state. And the problem that
Speaker 3: I have with this is that the FED never had
Speaker 3: the power to do this. They've got this whole thing backwards.
Speaker 3: They're assuming that the USDA was doing what it was
Speaker 3: authorized to do. What they need to do is not
Speaker 3: protect this. They need to shut down the USDA. We
Speaker 3: don't need the USDA at all. All agricultural oversight and
Speaker 3: concern about food quality and inspection that can and should
Speaker 3: be done locally and at the state level. The federal
Speaker 3: government should have no involvement in that, and under the
Speaker 3: Constitution it has no involvement in that. Show me in
Speaker 3: the Constitution where that power was delegated to the federal
Speaker 3: government by the states. It's nowhere to be found in
Speaker 3: the ninth and tenth Amendment. If these senators wanted to read,
Speaker 3: it makes it clear that they don't have that authority.
Speaker 3: Now we operate from the standpoint the federal government can
Speaker 3: do whatever it wishes unless it is expressly prohibited. That
Speaker 3: is exactly the opposite of what the Bill of Rights said.
Speaker 3: The Bill of Rights said that they don't have the
Speaker 3: power to do anything unless expressly delegated to it by
Speaker 3: the states and the people. And so this is I
Speaker 3: hope that from a pragmatic standpoint, I hope they get
Speaker 3: something like this together. But it just shows how far
Speaker 3: we are from getting anything solved politically, because they have
Speaker 3: the Constitution exactly backwards and upside down. Blackburn's press release
Speaker 3: notes that many states don't have many USDA certified facilities,
Speaker 3: which leads to farmers and rangers having to transport their
Speaker 3: animals across the state or to other states. Processing procedure
Speaker 3: becomes more expensive antime, I'm consuming for both farmers and ranchers.
Speaker 3: If you remember, I forgot the guy's name in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 3: the Amish guy. But he was saying during the pandemic,
Speaker 3: as they locked everything down, he couldn't book any time
Speaker 3: at the approved slaughterhouses, so he started slaughtering them. They're
Speaker 3: locally and he's doing it naturally. And he said, you know,
Speaker 3: when they put them on these feed lots, they're not
Speaker 3: giving them the best quality food. They're giving them a
Speaker 3: lot of GMOs stuff and anything. His customers much preferred
Speaker 3: to have the locally grown, locally slaughtered beef, and they
Speaker 3: knew what was going into their food at that point
Speaker 3: in time. But that's the whole point. The USDA is
Speaker 3: a big part of the problem, and just to give
Speaker 3: states the freedom to allow this is still not the issue.
Speaker 3: The USDA is the biggest, one of the biggest problems
Speaker 3: we have our food supply. They and the FDA.
Speaker 4: Inserting themselves where they're not needed, want or have the authority.
Speaker 4: Spective government doesn't do that at this point.
Speaker 3: I know, I know, but that again, when you look
Speaker 3: at the massive amount of money that we spend in Washington,
Speaker 3: and they're doing things for which they have no legal authority.
Speaker 3: You know, there's no more legal authority for the USDA
Speaker 3: than there is for what Trump is doing in Washington,
Speaker 3: d C. With the police. So they just do whatever
Speaker 3: they please. It's becoming more and more obvious, isn't it.
Speaker 3: And Tennessee Blackburn said the second highest grossing farm commodity
Speaker 3: is beef. She said the States farmers and richers shouldn't
Speaker 3: be held back by federal government red tape from selling
Speaker 3: their safe and fresh meat in the community. By passing
Speaker 3: the PRIMAC said, because they're not going to challenge the Leviathan,
Speaker 3: we can kind of carve back some of the power
Speaker 3: that Washington has assumed in the great anyway, the way
Speaker 3: that's reported when the Tennessee Star, they say House members
Speaker 3: who bring a companion bill are Chillie Pingree and Thomas Massey.
Speaker 3: They have to put Thomas Massey in there. They don't
Speaker 3: want to feature him prominently because you know they I
Speaker 3: want to support Trump and not Thomas Massey. I want
Speaker 3: to support our food and our farmers. I don't care
Speaker 3: about Trump. This is not the first time they write
Speaker 3: that the Prime Act has been introduced in Congress. In
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, the Prime Act was introduced in the House.
Speaker 3: They won't tell you it was introduced by Thomas Matsey.
Speaker 3: Isn't that interesting? But it never made it to the floor.
Speaker 3: Why would that be? I don't know anyway. Goldman Sachs
Speaker 3: is now saying America's egg supply has likely normalized after
Speaker 3: a supply shock. Who shocked the supply chain? Again? The
Speaker 3: USDA did that, and it only stopped because Brooke Rawlins,
Speaker 3: this political hack has approved an NMRNA vaccine. That's what
Speaker 3: they were after in the first place. They wanted to
Speaker 3: have a Foe crisis, so they had an excuse to
Speaker 3: create an mRNA vaccine to inject all of our food with.
Speaker 4: If they can't get you to take it directly, they'll
Speaker 4: just inject it directly into your chickens or cattle.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. And of course the pharmaceutical companies can
Speaker 3: make a lot more money because there's a lot more
Speaker 3: chickens and pork and beef. And if you take a
Speaker 3: look at all of the farm animals, if they can
Speaker 3: inject them and do it on an annual basis, I mean,
Speaker 3: you know, they try to treat us like cattle. They
Speaker 3: talk about herd immunity, but they're not going to get
Speaker 3: all three hundred million Americans to take an annual vaccine.
Speaker 3: But they can get you know, six hundred million farm
Speaker 3: animals to take it annually because they can get the
Speaker 3: farmers to do it.
Speaker 4: It's a real cash cow, that's right.
Speaker 3: So Goldman Sachs thinks that the nation's egg supply has
Speaker 3: likely normalized. Well, if you call having mRNA injected into
Speaker 3: your eggs normal, then I guess we could say that's
Speaker 3: the case. But just like Trump's policy, it said, the
Speaker 3: reckless policy of running a PCR test and if you
Speaker 3: get one positive, you kill you know, millions of birds
Speaker 3: on at a particular facility. They called that reckless. Well, yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right, but it was just like all of Trump's
Speaker 3: COVID policies. They were all reckless. And so we're Biden's.
Speaker 3: The two of them again are operating off the same
Speaker 3: script as all professional run.
Speaker 4: Got this little dude out here says you've got a virus.
Speaker 4: It says it, sir, I've got to kill all the
Speaker 4: oderly people.
Speaker 2: Put them in a home. We're gonna kill them.
Speaker 4: We're just gonna kill them.
Speaker 3: So now they're saying, well, we're going to leave you
Speaker 3: alone with eggs for right now, because now we have
Speaker 3: been able to inject our poison into it. Even as
Speaker 3: the egg market stabilizes after recent supply shocks, it's still
Speaker 3: wise to have backyard chicken coop and take part of
Speaker 3: your food supply into your own hands, right zero edge.
Speaker 3: But that is especially true, especially when you look at
Speaker 3: the fact that these mRNA vaccines, and when you go
Speaker 3: to tractor supply, they're proud of the fact that the
Speaker 3: chicks that they sell you there are injected with mRNA
Speaker 3: for bird flu and it's like, Okay, we'll go get
Speaker 3: them somewhere else. As a matter of fact, we found
Speaker 3: another supply place and Karen got the name of the
Speaker 3: people and called them up and they said they begin
Speaker 3: with like have a blessed Day or something of a Christians.
Speaker 3: He said, oh, we would never put that in our chicks,
Speaker 3: and it's like good, So I went back and got
Speaker 3: our chickens there. Trump meanwhile is launching what some have
Speaker 3: termed a Manhattan project. It's one of America's largest companies
Speaker 3: is set to be nationalized. This is from the Daily Mail.
Speaker 3: I have said for the longest time that Trump is
Speaker 3: a New York City democrat. He has all the harm
Speaker 3: all the hallmarks of a New York City democrat, including
Speaker 3: his friendship with Epstein. And what this is is again,
Speaker 3: we are becoming more and more like a third world
Speaker 3: banana republic with nuclear weapons. That's what third world banana
Speaker 3: republics do. They nationalize industries. What is the company that
Speaker 3: he wants to nationalize. It's Intel, you know, Lance, You
Speaker 3: and I were talking about this the other day and
Speaker 3: we talked about the competition between Nvidia and am D.
Speaker 3: I didn't realize that these two Taiwanese companies a MD
Speaker 3: and Nvidia were essentially owned by the same family or
Speaker 3: the cousins or something like that. You knew, you knew
Speaker 3: about that, But yeah.
Speaker 5: I believe the CEOs are cousins the same family that
Speaker 5: owns both of these two major graphics card companies, the
Speaker 5: first and second. And people get real tribal about which
Speaker 5: one they like. You know, people are you know real
Speaker 5: in AMD that's the best value, or know Nvidia is
Speaker 5: the way to go.
Speaker 3: But well Trump is getting real tribal and nationalistic, and
Speaker 3: he's even going to take over this business. We talked
Speaker 3: about this, I think you talked about last week or something,
Speaker 3: the fact that he starts criticizing the CEO of Intel,
Speaker 3: and so this this guy who's got connections to the
Speaker 3: Chinese and all the rest of stuff. So now he
Speaker 3: just thought about nationalizing it. After he throws this guy
Speaker 3: under the bus.
Speaker 4: In connections to the Chinese, does Trump not understand where
Speaker 4: Taiwan came from?
Speaker 3: Well, you know, when we look at you expect something
Speaker 3: like this from a professed socialist like Ma'm donnie or whatever.
Speaker 3: This guy is running for mayor in New York and
Speaker 3: yet look at this. This is Trump supposedly the arch
Speaker 3: enemy of that and the polar opposite. And yet it's
Speaker 3: Trump and his Republicans who are now going to push
Speaker 3: the nationalizing of a large company like Intel. It's just amazing.
Speaker 3: They'll do whatever Trump wants to do. And again, democrat
Speaker 3: don from New York City is acting just like the
Speaker 3: socialists as you would expect. So the company that they're
Speaker 3: concerned about TSMC, which is Taiwan Semiconductor and Manufacturing that
Speaker 3: was started, as I pointed out before on the show,
Speaker 3: started by a guy who was an engineer at Texas Instruments.
Speaker 3: Texas instruments wanted to move away from semiconductor manufacturing, and
Speaker 3: so after he'd worked for like thirty or forty years,
Speaker 3: he went back to Taiwan where he was from, and
Speaker 3: went to the government and got some seed money from
Speaker 3: the government there, and he created TSMC. He's like in
Speaker 3: his nineties now, and it was very successful. As a
Speaker 3: matter of fact, it's really Taiwan has so much a
Speaker 3: state of the art chip manufacturing there. That's why the
Speaker 3: US is so focused on keeping China out. But whatever happens,
Speaker 3: if China were to invade Taiwan, if they were to
Speaker 3: take over the semiductor fabrication centers there, they again they
Speaker 3: would use that as leverage against the US. And the
Speaker 3: other alternative would be for the Taiwanese to use that
Speaker 3: as a poison pill and blow them up, which again
Speaker 3: shuts down the world supply. So either way, it doesn't
Speaker 3: look good either way. You need to have some semiconductors here,
Speaker 3: but you're not going to get this if Donald Trump
Speaker 3: starts funding Intel. This is the government should not be
Speaker 3: running these corporations. Instead, if they were to get out
Speaker 3: of the way, there would be more of an incentive
Speaker 3: for private people to take a risk, just like that
Speaker 3: farmer did in Georgia. We don't need the government taking
Speaker 3: over running farms. We need people who have an incentive
Speaker 3: and a vision to take it over and run it.
Speaker 3: I don't even agree with they tell.
Speaker 4: Me until it makes ships, I said, I'm more of
Speaker 4: a lazed man myself.
Speaker 2: But you know, to each their own.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you wouldn't know semi conductor from a potato chip bag. Anyway.
Speaker 3: Both Biden and Trump threw billions of dollars at TSMC
Speaker 3: to open up an American plant in Phoenix. As I
Speaker 3: talked about that, it's been a real culture shock, especially
Speaker 3: because the American engineers said they were kind of iced
Speaker 3: out of any discussions that were. The Taiwanese engineers very cliquish.
Speaker 3: They would you speak in their language instead of English.
Speaker 3: And then when they came to the US a while
Speaker 3: of the engineers said, well, we got finished with our work,
Speaker 3: and these guys who were Taiwanese would just hang around
Speaker 3: afterwards virtue signaling about how they don't have a life
Speaker 3: except for the company, and their entire life is devoted
Speaker 3: to the company. They said, we're done with our work,
Speaker 3: we want to go home. So it's kind of created
Speaker 3: a real cultural issue. I don't see that working very well.
Speaker 3: I don't know what's going to happen with Intel. Intel
Speaker 3: had weathered the semic productor stuff. When I was working
Speaker 3: for Texas Instruments, they were having a lot of trouble
Speaker 3: getting manufacturing done. All their production was coming out of Japan.
Speaker 3: The American production facilities that we had in Houston were
Speaker 3: not producing much of anything, and I think that's one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why they wanted to get out of
Speaker 3: the business. But the Japanese and some others got into
Speaker 3: memory chips RAM chips at the time, and it became
Speaker 3: a commodity market. And so it was Intel that started
Speaker 3: doing acro processors and they were very, very profitable because
Speaker 3: they had a niche that was based on innovation rather
Speaker 3: than on getting the cost of manufacturing down, which is
Speaker 3: what happened with memory chips. And as part of what
Speaker 3: I think sour TI on that whole thing. But when
Speaker 3: the government is going to actually nationalize an industry, and
Speaker 3: who didn't see this coming, I mean, that's the next
Speaker 3: obvious step. When you get in so much subsidy from Washington.
Speaker 3: Trump is there picking winners and losers rewarding his pals
Speaker 3: and contributors with big contracts and all the rest of
Speaker 3: the stuff that Corney. Capitalism is going to naturally evolve
Speaker 3: into nationalized industries, and that is going to We're going
Speaker 3: to become like China in order to defeat them. We're
Speaker 3: not going to beat them at their own game. We've
Speaker 3: always beaten these centrally planned nationalized economies by having a
Speaker 3: free economy that allowed for innovation. Anyway, former they said,
Speaker 3: this feels like the Manhattan Project. And you know, I've
Speaker 3: got a review of the book that was done by
Speaker 3: Alex karpa palanteer palenteers on the news and now on
Speaker 3: a daily basis. I've been talking about this for a
Speaker 3: long time. And if you want to see something really scary,
Speaker 3: get Alex Carp's book, The Technological Republic. And I did
Speaker 3: get that book and I've been reading it and he
Speaker 3: constantly refers to the Manhattan Project and the Adam Baum
Speaker 3: as being the pinnacle of American history. That was when
Speaker 3: government was really strong, that was when government was in
Speaker 3: union with corporations and anything. Well, you know, Alex, we
Speaker 3: got a word for that. It's called economic fascism. That's
Speaker 3: what you're promoting. And of course what is really disgusting
Speaker 3: and scary is that the guy who as part of this,
Speaker 3: you know, he's allied with Teal and the technocrats and
Speaker 3: of course with Trump. He is a bigger warmonger than
Speaker 3: Lindsey Graham, if you can imagine such a thing. And
Speaker 3: this is a guy who is sitting there watching and
Speaker 3: analyzing each and every one of us with his spy software,
Speaker 3: and he just he wants government to be involved in everything,
Speaker 3: and he wants us to be involved in every kind
Speaker 3: of war. And so here you have people talking about
Speaker 3: this nationalizing of Intel. They call it a Manhattan project.
Speaker 4: This is a bit off topic, but of course Paleteer
Speaker 4: CEO and Palmer Lucky are going into business together to
Speaker 4: create a new crypto wallet currency. I forget exactly what
Speaker 4: it is, but they're calling it Arabor. You know, they've
Speaker 4: got Palenteer in Duril and now Arabor. People pointed out
Speaker 4: Arabor was the area that was looted and sacked by
Speaker 4: Smoug the Dragon, which is a very strange thing to call,
Speaker 4: you know, the banking system thing you're working on.
Speaker 3: They kind of tip their hand. I always thought that
Speaker 3: that was a real hat tip of Palunteer, and of
Speaker 3: course they embraced the token symbols and all that stuff
Speaker 3: very heavily and their corporate culture and talk to me
Speaker 3: about it was very intentional that they would make their
Speaker 3: surveillance and data mining company that they would name it
Speaker 3: after a crystal ball that was designed to surveil people
Speaker 3: and even to look inside of them. You know.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think it works on multiple levels because you know,
Speaker 4: Aragorn as the true King, has the authority to look
Speaker 4: into the palenteer. He's allowed to use it without corrupting him.
Speaker 4: He has the physical and mental fortitude to do it.
Speaker 4: And I think that's how they see themselves. Oh, we
Speaker 4: have the right to do this. We're strong enough, we
Speaker 4: can do it, and therefore we must.
Speaker 3: Oh Yeah. What emerges from Alex Carp's book as a
Speaker 3: amazing how elitist this guy is, how statist he is,
Speaker 3: how fascist he is, how war mongering he is. And
Speaker 3: I've got something I'll be putting up on substack about it.
Speaker 4: Anyway, dot comport Slash, the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they say it's every bit as important as the
Speaker 3: Space race was in order to take over these companies.
Speaker 3: You know, I guess My question is, well, why can't
Speaker 3: we just fake it again?
Speaker 4: How important was the space race exactly? You're gonna have
Speaker 4: to quantify that.
Speaker 3: Why don't we fake this whole AI thing? You know
Speaker 3: a lot of people that used to say, yeah, they've
Speaker 3: done that, They've been caught doing that many times. But
Speaker 3: when they say, yeah, this is AI watching everybody pick
Speaker 3: up stuff in the grocery store, the convenience store and
Speaker 3: totaling up what they're doing. And it turned out that
Speaker 3: it was an.
Speaker 4: Army of underpaid Indian workers.
Speaker 3: So people started joking that AI stood for actually Indians.
Speaker 5: Well, the other one that just happened where there was
Speaker 5: a coating group that tried to pass off their projects
Speaker 5: as done by an AI.
Speaker 4: Agent and it was just a amount of Indians. Maybe
Speaker 4: that's why we're getting less scam calls. Maybe they're all
Speaker 4: taken up, you know, yeah, pretending to be AI right now, Well.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 5: AI starts asking for your credit code number, you know,
Speaker 5: something's up.
Speaker 3: I don't know. If Trump nationalizes Intel, who's he going
Speaker 3: to get to run at Peter Navarro. That's one thing
Speaker 3: that muscot right. He is dumber than the psycho bricks Anyway,
Speaker 3: Alice Carp thinks that the atomic bomb and the Manhattan
Speaker 3: Project were the pinnacle of America. I think just the opposite.
Speaker 3: I think there's this nator. Anyway, he constantly talks about
Speaker 3: Love's War. His book is The Technological Republic. I said
Speaker 3: to you, guys, I said, can you imagine the outrage
Speaker 3: if somebody had written a book called the Theological Republic?
Speaker 3: And yet their religion of technology is of technocracy is
Speaker 3: just fine, and it is laudable. And he's got people
Speaker 3: like Mattis and others General Mattis who write the forward
Speaker 3: to his book, and it is amazing. And you can
Speaker 3: see from the people that are heaping praise on him,
Speaker 3: you can see how he is connected, and of course
Speaker 3: he is. Peter Thiel and Alex Scartt now are kind
Speaker 3: of the inner core of Builderberg where Kissinger used to be.
Speaker 3: They really are at the center of the elite. So
Speaker 3: Taiwan controls more than sixty percent of the market in
Speaker 3: order to power artificial intelligence, defense and the economy. So again,
Speaker 3: we got to just nationalize it. If it's important, We're
Speaker 3: going to nationalize that. We've already seen this from Trump
Speaker 3: with the rare Earth minerals. He's already started pouring massive
Speaker 3: amounts of money and to de facto nationalize these companies
Speaker 3: if he doesn't do it altogether. And the problem that
Speaker 3: he has as he's saying that he's going to put
Speaker 3: one hundred percent tariff on any computer chips that are
Speaker 3: not manufactured in the United States, as he wants to
Speaker 3: shut down rare earth minerals, the problem is is like
Speaker 3: a petulant child, this dictator doesn't wait until there's a
Speaker 3: domestic alternative. He's just going to shut it down now
Speaker 3: and tell people to bootstrap using what after he takes
Speaker 3: away their supply chains. It's actually idiotic, and that's one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why we can see that people of
Speaker 3: this mentality cannot run the companies that they nationalize. This
Speaker 3: has always been a hallmark of Marxism's why we were
Speaker 3: always able to transcend the Marxist authoritarian countries, because they
Speaker 3: had the hubrist to think that they could run these
Speaker 3: different industries. That was one of the key insights I
Speaker 3: think that Hitler had over stalin. Both of them call
Speaker 3: themselves socialists, both of them were totalitarian. Both of them
Speaker 3: wanted to own and run everything. The difference between them
Speaker 3: was how they were going to come into it, And
Speaker 3: Hitler said, Stalin took over all the industries and thinks
Speaker 3: he can run them. He says, I'm going to let
Speaker 3: these guys run it. We get to the end, then
Speaker 3: they basically slit their throats and take the business. It's
Speaker 3: a smarter way to do it. But you know, again,
Speaker 3: they're not that much different from each other, except in
Speaker 3: their approach. Trump is actually more of a communist. He's
Speaker 3: more of a solidist approach than he is even of
Speaker 3: a fascist. So we'll have to see what happens.
Speaker 4: Sense.
Speaker 3: Yeah, again, it's going to be another precedent for Trump,
Speaker 3: a very bad precedent. And this comes after two Ai
Speaker 3: companies last week agreed to hand over fifteen percent of
Speaker 3: their chip sales revenue in China to the US government
Speaker 3: in exchange for export licenses. That was also unprecedented, and
Speaker 3: that was the other two companies run by the cousins,
Speaker 3: the Taiwanese cousins, AMD In Nvidia. So he hit them
Speaker 3: with a fifteen percent thing. A lot of people are saying,
Speaker 3: wait a minute, we thought this this ban on Chinese
Speaker 3: on exports these chips to China, we thought that was
Speaker 3: about national security. Now it's all just about the money.
Speaker 3: And yeah, that's that's really what it is, because everything
Speaker 3: for Trump comes down to money. In the short term,
Speaker 3: this is fantastic, said one analyst. In the long term, wow,
Speaker 3: this could turn bad in a hurry. Yep, it's an
Speaker 3: incredibly slippery slope precedent, said another. The deal could pour
Speaker 3: more than two billion dollars into the US government, The
Speaker 3: New York Times reported, although Trump did not reveal what
Speaker 3: the money could be used for. Again, do we really
Speaker 3: want to see is it a win? Conservatives? Maga people,
Speaker 3: When government grows, do you want to characterize and continue
Speaker 3: to characterize out as a win. I don't see it
Speaker 3: that way. I think it's a big loss when government
Speaker 3: grows because it takes things away from the rest of US.
Speaker 3: Sources say Trump and the AI companies entered the agreement.
Speaker 3: The president declared that he would impose one hundred percent
Speaker 3: tariff on imports the semic directors and chips unless they
Speaker 3: were built in the United States. Again, he's going to
Speaker 3: lock down manufacturing since it's going to take a time
Speaker 3: for these things to be set up. Even if they
Speaker 3: are set up. As I said before, he's nothing other
Speaker 3: than a petulant child, a dictator who demands I want
Speaker 3: it now. Now, you know, this is like he's like
Speaker 3: Kim Jong un in that regard. The two of them
Speaker 3: are so much alike.
Speaker 4: He always shoots par he always does the exact right thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, there was an interesting thing, you know, when
Speaker 3: we this is a to and now for something completely different.
Speaker 3: There was a jet that was taxing down the runway
Speaker 3: and they were giving a kind of a reward flight
Speaker 3: to a recruiter, letting him fly on a jet. Somehow
Speaker 3: he didn't get the briefing from Q about the ejector syne.
Speaker 6: Now, if you take the tops, you will find a
Speaker 6: little red bottle. Whatever you do, don't touch it. Why not,
Speaker 6: because you will released this section of the roof and
Speaker 6: engagement and fire the passenger ejector seat.
Speaker 3: Ejector seat. You're joking.
Speaker 6: I never joke about my web double A seven.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, let's take a look at what happened with
Speaker 3: an ejection. This is the air show where they had
Speaker 3: this happening.
Speaker 5: Made it out of that nobody was hurt.
Speaker 4: To be fair, this is actually probably more rare than
Speaker 4: getting a ride and a fighter jet, you know how
Speaker 4: many people actually get.
Speaker 3: Too here it is a slow motion leak at this
Speaker 3: that doesn't even look real. That looks like a special effects.
Speaker 3: This does them sequentially. You know, first it does the
Speaker 3: backseat casinger and then it does the pilot.
Speaker 4: Millions of dollars in costs put those seats back in
Speaker 4: after they've been used. Yeah, yeah, where is that jet
Speaker 4: just completely scrapped? What's going on there?
Speaker 3: I don't know that was That was in Westfield, Massachusetts,
Speaker 3: and uh, you know, even James Bond got a briefing
Speaker 3: on that. Evidently they didn't give that to this guy.
Speaker 3: The passenger was reportedly a recruiting officer. The unplanned ejection
Speaker 3: occurred during what is called an incentive flight, a reward
Speaker 3: for service members. So they put that out there's an incentive.
Speaker 3: You know, you do this and that you meet these goals,
Speaker 3: we'll give you a ride and a fighter jet.
Speaker 4: You got the right of it, just like you sucker
Speaker 4: enough teenagers into signing up for this.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. So he got ejected. Yeah, apparently Q
Speaker 3: didn't brief him. See that red button, do not touch it.
Speaker 3: But that's the kind of funny you get into. Can
Speaker 3: you imagine getting on the backseat of a of a
Speaker 3: fighter jet and you start pushing buttons. Friend who was
Speaker 3: what does one do?
Speaker 4: What does that one do?
Speaker 3: I had a friend who was the military. I was
Speaker 3: really good friends with both these guys in high school.
Speaker 3: And his brother I want to see him at when
Speaker 3: he was in the army, and he was he was
Speaker 3: in tanks, right, And so his brother shows them and
Speaker 3: he says, would you like to drive this tank? Which
Speaker 3: is like, I would have never said that, And he
Speaker 3: says he went crazy and he started running over trees
Speaker 3: and everything else. But anyway, I guess that's what happens sometimes.
Speaker 3: It just depends on your personality type. Uh. And then
Speaker 3: speaking of people who don't really know how to control things,
Speaker 3: we had a tragedy in Florida a turnpike which I
Speaker 3: looked at this. I have no idea where the Florida
Speaker 3: Turnpike is. When I was in Florida, there were no
Speaker 3: toll roads or anything like that. But this is a
Speaker 3: migrant truck driver from Punjab allegedly executed an illegal u
Speaker 3: turn the turnpike and he wound up executing people by
Speaker 3: doing that catastrophic collision that killed three Americans. We have
Speaker 3: a video of this. No, actually that's another one. I
Speaker 3: thank you very much for the U turn. That's a
Speaker 3: different video. Here is the U turn. The guy actually
Speaker 3: had his cab camera actually caught it here as you
Speaker 3: can see he's turning and she said, there comes a
Speaker 3: car crashing into it going fast and they cannot sew
Speaker 3: down in time, and it killed all the people in
Speaker 3: the car. As I point out, this is something that
Speaker 3: has been happening in a large degree under Biden. And
Speaker 3: of course that all focuses on Biden in California in
Speaker 3: this article, except that this guy came into the country
Speaker 3: in twenty eighteen. Who was president then, Travis Kving, Can.
Speaker 4: I get multiple choice? I think Trump or.
Speaker 3: It can't be Trump. It can't be Trump because he
Speaker 3: protected the border. Right, No, he didn't. This guy came in,
Speaker 3: but he did get his commercial driver's license in California,
Speaker 3: and you know doesn't have to you know, not to
Speaker 3: read or to be able to understand what is happening
Speaker 3: with it. And this is an article that's put out
Speaker 3: by American Truckers United because they're being undercut with cheap
Speaker 3: labor from people who can't speak English, can't read English,
Speaker 3: and it is a real threat, not to mention the
Speaker 3: fact that they haven't really had them qualify in the
Speaker 3: California system as drivers.
Speaker 4: One of the most chilling things about that video is
Speaker 4: just the lack of any emotion or expression at all
Speaker 4: on the guy's face. Yeah, he doesn't when he sees
Speaker 4: the cart. It not nothing. Yeah, he doesn't put his
Speaker 4: head in his hands or reaction.
Speaker 3: The pictures of him standing around afterwards, he doesn't seem
Speaker 3: to be distraught either, but zero. Yeah. The yeah, you
Speaker 3: know that was they have the Mansfield bar on the
Speaker 3: back of the trucks. They called that because Jane Mansfield
Speaker 3: was decapitated, an actress in the fifties. She was decapitated,
Speaker 3: she fell asleep and the driver rearented this truck and
Speaker 3: you know, took off the top of their car. But
Speaker 3: there is no bar on the side, and that's where
Speaker 3: that truck hit it, you know, So basically the same effect.
Speaker 3: And so American Truckers United said, we've urged Transportation Secretary
Speaker 3: Duffy to ban commercial driver's licenses that have been issued
Speaker 3: to non citizens and to probe these threats. But the
Speaker 3: inaction persists amid record migrant influxes into the industry. So
Speaker 3: so far six months in nothing has been done by
Speaker 3: the Secretary of Transportation. He's now getting a lot of
Speaker 3: heat and you can now expect that something will happen,
Speaker 3: but it had to result in three people in their lives.
Speaker 3: There are multi lingual signs at Walmart and Amazon depots
Speaker 3: that signal the scale. Yet mom and pop US truckers
Speaker 3: face bankruptcy while migrants fuel fraud and fatalities. And of
Speaker 3: course it's all being done for greed so they can
Speaker 3: make a little bit more money. Right. They want to
Speaker 3: the big corporations and the big companies like Walmart and Amazon.
Speaker 3: They want the cheapest possible stuff and they will eventually here.
Speaker 4: If you're some third world immigrant that has faked everything,
Speaker 4: working for a fake company.
Speaker 3: Well of course they're going to replace everybody as soon
Speaker 3: as they can with robots and self driving trucks. And
Speaker 3: you can imagine, you know, you talk about remorse, it's
Speaker 3: not going to be remorse from the AI when it
Speaker 3: does kind of move like that guy did.
Speaker 4: It was calculated to be more efficient.
Speaker 3: That's right. I remember a couple of years ago, these
Speaker 3: guys were testing out self driving on an eighty thousand
Speaker 3: pound semi and what had happened was the test drivers
Speaker 3: had switched it off when it was in the middle
Speaker 3: of a turn in a parking lot, and they were
Speaker 3: going down the highway like this, like a turnpike like this,
Speaker 3: and they switched the thing back on and it came
Speaker 3: back up in the state. So it thinks it's in
Speaker 3: the middle of a turn and it does a hard
Speaker 3: left or whatever across there. And they said, fortunately there
Speaker 3: wasn't anybody there, but again, you know, it would have
Speaker 3: done exactly the same thing, could.
Speaker 4: Have cleared the memory state.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we'd done the same thing the Sikh guy did.
Speaker 3: The American trucking industry has been gutted by unregulated immigration
Speaker 3: over the past five years. These so called California drivers
Speaker 3: put greed before your family, the corporations do. This is
Speaker 3: from the American Truckers United, and they're absolutely right about that. Well,
Speaker 3: we've got to take a quick break and we come back.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a look.
Speaker 4: We got a lot of comments before we go to break.
Speaker 3: Oh, thank you for reminding me again. Yes, stealth Patriot,
Speaker 3: thank you very much for the tip, He says. Welcome back, David.
Speaker 3: You almost have to look with fondness when was president
Speaker 3: and told an that right lie, except you already had
Speaker 3: a history of lying. You could blame it on his dementia. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you know when we That's the key thing about Trump
Speaker 3: Trump is there. They put people like Trump in so
Speaker 3: they can get away with things that they wouldn't be
Speaker 3: able to get away. They play this tribalism. You know,
Speaker 3: they know that Democrats can get away with certain things
Speaker 3: and Republicans can get away with certain things, and they
Speaker 3: can't get away with certain things. And so that's one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why they do this left right stuff.
Speaker 3: Is one of the reasons why we had mail im
Speaker 3: ballance was to get Trump out and to get Biden in.
Speaker 3: Blutin gifted fifteen more subscriptions to the show on a kick.
Speaker 3: That's a total twenty five today. Thank you so much.
Speaker 3: I appreciate that. And old dude one, thank you for
Speaker 3: the tipp He says. Until the people recognize the foundation
Speaker 3: of reality and pursue right standing with God's standard, America's
Speaker 3: descent will continue. The battle is ideological creation versus evolution
Speaker 3: origin matters. I agree absolutely. Did you mention last week
Speaker 3: about answers in genesis and their Pigeon Forge thing that
Speaker 3: up in there now, I didn't. Well, folks, if you
Speaker 3: haven't seen it, if you're in the area, stop by.
Speaker 3: I haven't seen it yet, but I just saw it
Speaker 3: on Friday or Thursday or Friday. Answers in Genesis, which
Speaker 3: does a great job of creation versus evolution, has opened
Speaker 3: up a virtual reality presentation they've done here in Pigeon Forge.
Speaker 3: They're going to do another one in Branson, which is
Speaker 3: kind of like a clone of Pigeon Forge in a
Speaker 3: lot of different ways. And anyway, it's worth stopping by there.
Speaker 3: They do a great job, always have. They have engineers
Speaker 3: that used to work for Universal and Disney down in Orlando.
Speaker 3: They do an excellent, first rate job. They make the
Speaker 3: truth entertaining. It doesn't need to be entertaining, but you know,
Speaker 3: why not make it that way? Can reach more people
Speaker 3: that way. A conservative thinker, thank you very much, He says,
Speaker 3: this new set is missing a Nathan Bedford forest necktie. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we got a lot of plays to get that. It's
Speaker 3: from Ryan.
Speaker 4: It's right over there somewhere.
Speaker 3: Oh, we have it. Okay, good.
Speaker 4: I saw it last night and I have to grab it.
Speaker 3: B Turner one seventy. Thank you very much for the
Speaker 3: tippy rights. Welcome back, David. Glad you returned in time
Speaker 3: to host your annual nine to eleven show. Looking forward
Speaker 3: to it. Well, thank you very much. You know, it's interesting.
Speaker 3: Didn't realize it until we did a little promo saying
Speaker 3: I was going to be back today. Didn't realize but
Speaker 3: this is almost exactly to the day, eight years after
Speaker 3: I began my solo show back in twenty seventeen. It's
Speaker 3: kind of interesting. We didn't plan it that way. Skun
Speaker 3: Collo Rose Gardens, thank you very much for the tip. Says,
Speaker 3: Peace be with you, David. Thank you. Aldi, Modern Retro
Speaker 3: Radio says keep me in your prayers for folks. I
Speaker 3: talked to the president of my company. If he and
Speaker 3: the former owner don't achieve an agreement regarding transfer the company,
Speaker 3: I could be on the job market by December. Oh,
Speaker 3: I'm so sorry to hear that. Also, remember he's got
Speaker 3: modern retro Radio. I don't know how the support works
Speaker 3: on that, but he's got a great radio program there.
Speaker 3: All right, We'll keep you in our prayers. So sorry
Speaker 3: to hear that. Audi. Karen Carpenter twenty seven. Very common
Speaker 3: for people to see their mother or relatives waiting for
Speaker 3: them at the end of life. I've read hundreds of
Speaker 3: near death experiences, so fascinating. Yes, that's true. That's one
Speaker 3: of the things about this atheist that I was talking
Speaker 3: about earlier. He started saying things as a matter of fact.
Speaker 3: One of the issues that it was really a well
Speaker 3: written article. One of the issues was a guy that
Speaker 3: he visited whose wife had severe demitia and she was
Speaker 3: totally noncommunicative, and he was the family and went back
Speaker 3: because she died and he needed some support and she
Speaker 3: was incapable responding to anything. She always had her head
Speaker 3: down and her mouth open and that type of thing.
Speaker 3: And he said that when he went back to console
Speaker 3: the husband, he said she was talking to angels. And
Speaker 3: he said, I'll be right back, and he came back
Speaker 3: with a bunch of pictures, and he said, this woman
Speaker 3: who hadn't talked for years, all of a sudden he
Speaker 3: hears her talking, and he walks in and she's setting
Speaker 3: up in bed, motioning with her hands and talking and
Speaker 3: all this other kind of stuff. And he started taking
Speaker 3: pictures of her stills and showed him to this guy
Speaker 3: who was the hospice guy, and he was totally stunned
Speaker 3: by He said, there's absolutely no what you know, a
Speaker 3: lot of times people are very sick or maybe even
Speaker 3: and nacoma sometimes will come to just before they die.
Speaker 3: And he said her body was too badly damaged for that,
Speaker 3: you know. But anyway, she died about an hour after
Speaker 3: that event. And that's something that's very common. I have
Speaker 3: relatives who've had that type of experience as well. Little
Speaker 3: Ford Schoolhouse, good to see you. I used to work
Speaker 3: in hospice and it is very difficult, emotionally draining. Definitely, yeah,
Speaker 3: I agree. As I said, most people only last about
Speaker 3: five years. This guy lasted thirty three years. But it
Speaker 3: changed him, It really softened him up. In Max in Minnesota,
Speaker 3: eighty percent of deaths were in nursing homes forced to
Speaker 3: take the flu shots and c That was the saddest
Speaker 3: thing about it. I remember seeing pictures of them going
Speaker 3: to a home where they had somebody with down syndrome
Speaker 3: who didn't want to get the shot. They were screaming
Speaker 3: and they pinned them down and gave them a shot.
Speaker 3: It's just barbaric what they did. Aldi modern retro radio,
Speaker 3: Trump is bringing up all the classic scandals to make
Speaker 3: us forget about Trump Stein, Yeah, don't Fragen me bro
Speaker 3: like Stalin said, it doesn't matter who votes, only matters
Speaker 3: who counts the votes. That's right. And does it matter
Speaker 3: who you vote for if the ballot is so tightly
Speaker 3: controlled by both the Democrats and Republicans that they eliminate
Speaker 3: your choices even within the party, and they also eliminate
Speaker 3: the debates. How dare Trump complain about the medal and
Speaker 3: without ballots when it's based on his lockdowns? And you
Speaker 3: want to talk about rigging elections? What about the fact
Speaker 3: that neither Trump nor Biden wanted to have any debates,
Speaker 3: either within their own party or with each other. I mean,
Speaker 3: they just want to shut everything down. They're afraid.
Speaker 4: We have that old thaying, you know, better to keep
Speaker 4: your mouth shut and be thought an idiot than to
Speaker 4: open it and confirm any of both the other.
Speaker 3: I think that was Lincoln that said that, Yeah, it
Speaker 3: was anyway.
Speaker 5: I find it funny that, you know, there's the very
Speaker 5: well known saying, it's not who council the votes, it's
Speaker 5: it's who votes that counts who counts the votes, And
Speaker 5: apparently Trump never heard that before. He has to go
Speaker 5: I talked to this guy at Putin. Real clever guy,
Speaker 5: he says, male inelection's bad idea.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, who could have known?
Speaker 2: I could have known.
Speaker 4: Nobody could have known.
Speaker 2: It's crazy.
Speaker 3: Well, he would know. He's somebody who's reading enough elections
Speaker 3: in his own lifetime. I'm sure nice a Storm crime
Speaker 3: goes down under Democrats because they don't charge people. Yeah,
Speaker 3: there you go, just let him go. We won't count that.
Speaker 3: Aldi Monotro Radio. Trump is turning the country into a
Speaker 3: perpetual police state. Yes, we have something on that. I
Speaker 3: hope we can get to it. There will be military
Speaker 3: presence all over the country before his term ends for
Speaker 3: our safety, of course. Yes, Nico Storm, they don't want
Speaker 3: you to have weapons of war quote unquote. Yeah, the
Speaker 3: police have both those weapons and equipment used in war,
Speaker 3: and they're getting more and more of it all the time.
Speaker 3: Doug A. Lugg says, see where the Clarkson's farm is
Speaker 3: interesting as he runs into government regulations making it hard
Speaker 3: for him to do his farm to fork plan. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's that's I haven't seen it. A lot of people
Speaker 3: have spoken highly of Eric Peterson likes it a lot,
Speaker 3: and I imagine that's one of the real benefits from it,
Speaker 3: you know, when you see the obstacles that government puts
Speaker 3: in people's way when they're trying to earn a living.
Speaker 3: I grew up with that. I grew up watching my
Speaker 3: dad struggle as an independent businessman, and I had two
Speaker 3: grandfathers who had both had to fight the government to
Speaker 3: make a living. That's the reality. And I'm glad that
Speaker 3: Clarkson is doing that and televising it so people can
Speaker 3: see what is happening. And they're also coming after the pubs,
Speaker 3: and so he's opened up a pub. I know a
Speaker 3: little bit about the program, even though I've never seen it.
Speaker 3: We're gonna have to watch that nice story.
Speaker 4: It's really good, is it.
Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, he's always funny. Uh. Maybe he can invite
Speaker 3: Piers Morgan to the pub and dump a pint of
Speaker 3: beer on his head. We can only hope he famously
Speaker 3: did that on the Concord. He jumped the champagne on
Speaker 3: him or something.
Speaker 4: I think he also might have hit him a little
Speaker 4: bit too.
Speaker 3: I know he's just a little bit maybe just a
Speaker 3: little bit, yeah, nicest storm all the pro Second Amendment
Speaker 3: stuff and the big beautiful bill got neutered. Do you
Speaker 3: still need to beg permission for certain items. Yeah, we
Speaker 3: were told they're going to get rid of the requirements
Speaker 3: for suppressors and stuff like that. They just kind of vanished.
Speaker 3: So yeah, it was it was not It was big,
Speaker 3: but it wasn't beautiful.
Speaker 4: It was kind of silently removed.
Speaker 3: Yeah, only folks, a Democrat like Democrat Don would call
Speaker 3: a gigantic omnibus bill beautiful. That in and of itself
Speaker 3: should tell you something OUTI monitor radio. Trump is trying
Speaker 3: to re establish credibility again, which will prove to be
Speaker 3: another grift of deception. Yes, the worst is yet to come, folks,
Speaker 3: stay tuned, nice of the storm. They don't want you
Speaker 3: to have weapons. I think I already did that one
Speaker 3: with the price of beef. Who can afford to be
Speaker 3: a stakeholder? SDD As it get on, Jason, I appreciate
Speaker 3: it mem more two four forward. Technocratic feudalism is here.
Speaker 3: It is, and they're going to be rolling it out
Speaker 3: big time. They're going to accelerate it. This Trump's purpose
Speaker 3: there trust. Remember all the people in his administration who
Speaker 3: said I'm here to restore trust in fill in the blank,
Speaker 3: I'm here to restore trust in the FBI by withholding
Speaker 3: the Epstein documents. I'm here to restore trust in vaccines
Speaker 3: and so forth by doing some show hearings and things
Speaker 3: like that. That's what RFK Junior said. I don't want
Speaker 3: trust restored in these unconstitutional organizations. I want to shut down.
Speaker 3: Centurion Blood said. One thing I can say I like
Speaker 3: seeing is a lot more mom and pop butcher shops
Speaker 3: popping up in South Texas. Good. That's a good sign.
Speaker 3: Don't frighten me. Bro says. If you want to get
Speaker 3: inexpensive good beef, find local four h and FAA with
Speaker 3: events events, okay, and sponsor kids to raise cows. There
Speaker 3: you go. Well, the problem was that in Pennsylvania they
Speaker 3: were they had people who bought shares in the cows.
Speaker 3: That's one of the ways that people get around the
Speaker 3: government's war on raw milk. You buy the cow and
Speaker 3: now that's your own milk, and you know. But they
Speaker 3: were not having it, and it's kind of interesting. They
Speaker 3: were supported by the USDA, but it was actually the
Speaker 3: state of Pennsylvania that was cracking down on Amos Miller.
Speaker 3: His name just came to me, Amos Miller. I believe
Speaker 3: it was the state of Pennsylvania, of course, probably in
Speaker 3: cooperation with USDA. About the Disney robots, Caboose eight says,
Speaker 3: So Disney is part of the military industrial complex. Now
Speaker 3: they get a lot of money. I'm sure that they
Speaker 3: could channel some of that research over there. And if
Speaker 3: the military effort wants to have a little cute robots
Speaker 3: to do suicide attacks. On the other side, I'm sure
Speaker 3: they cond of attacked Disney.
Speaker 5: Team to make it attle like a duck and other
Speaker 5: team to turn the eyes red, and they have the
Speaker 5: imposing movements, but.
Speaker 3: You go full terminator terminator.
Speaker 4: But also when it comes to propaganda arm of the
Speaker 4: military industrial complex, I'm sure Disney is involved. They've done
Speaker 4: nothing but horrendous anti family, anti propaganda for years, years
Speaker 4: and years.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Karen Carpenter says, my cousin had a farm to
Speaker 3: table restaurant but lost it during the scamdemic. Again, you know,
Speaker 3: like I said before, how many of these farms got
Speaker 3: shut down by Trump's lockdown. It really hammered the middle
Speaker 3: class in main street America. Conservative anchor, I'm seriously considering
Speaker 3: getting a cow or a couple of goats. Get the cow,
Speaker 3: maybe forget the goats. They're they're high maintenance. I've heard
Speaker 3: they can get into a lot of mischief.
Speaker 4: And goats are really cute though.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they can show you a lot of things.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so if you're going to get a cow, you
Speaker 4: need more than one. They're very social animals. You need
Speaker 4: at least two cows or the cow gets depressed and
Speaker 4: isn't very healthy. They're extremely social and you need at
Speaker 4: least to preferably more for what people say.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and you need need a couple of donkeys or
Speaker 3: a Great Pyrenees or something to guard them as well.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a whole thing starting to get them a managerie.
Speaker 4: It's like you needed this entire skill set to care
Speaker 4: for these things or something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, keep the local vet in business there, man militia. Honestly,
Speaker 3: when I see a commercial truck on the road in Canada,
Speaker 3: either stay way back or try to get around him.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, yeah, that's always good advice. Anyway.
Speaker 4: It's one exit in Austin that's by the airport and
Speaker 4: it you know, so it's a lane that you can
Speaker 4: ride in for a long time, then all of a
Speaker 4: sudden becomes a turn only and I know that it
Speaker 4: was coming up. I would always get away from the
Speaker 4: lane right next to it, because truckers would ride in
Speaker 4: that lane and they wouldn't know it was coming up.
Speaker 4: And two times had saved my life doing that because
Speaker 4: they last second just swerve right out of it.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, it's amazing. Yeah, it's a difficult thing to drive,
Speaker 3: and there's so much mass with it that you don't
Speaker 3: stand change.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't drive on.
Speaker 3: Defy tyrants seventeen seventy six eighteen wheelers sometimes going eighty
Speaker 3: in the sixty zone here, n Max. We must demand
Speaker 3: these drug and food cores get corporations, get prison time,
Speaker 3: not a slap on the wrist. Yeah. I haven't even
Speaker 3: seen them get a slap on the wrist for this
Speaker 3: stuff that they're doing anyway. But we're gonna take a
Speaker 3: quick break when we come back. We're gonna take a
Speaker 3: look at a little bit of the stuff that's happening
Speaker 3: in the UK, because there's the anger there is really
Speaker 3: getting dialed up. And with just cause over the double
Speaker 3: standard will be right back.
Speaker 4: Stay with us.
Speaker 6: But unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real
Speaker 6: economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are
Speaker 6: fighting for purely an abstract principle It is, however, not
Speaker 6: nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue
Speaker 6: involved here is one of monopolies. Today, the British government
Speaker 6: will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow
Speaker 6: it will be something else.
Speaker 2: Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Night
Speaker 2: Show as defending the American dream. You're listening to the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Oh okay, played a little bit of a clip there
Speaker 3: of the American Revolution. But looks like the British are
Speaker 3: about to have a revolution on their own home territory.
Speaker 3: People are getting so upset with a double standard. Their
Speaker 3: government has decide they want to take everything away from them.
Speaker 3: And not only that, but they have nothing but contempt
Speaker 3: for Native Britain. They are bringing in people from other
Speaker 3: countries and defending them. It's a two tier standard of justice.
Speaker 4: I mentioned this on the show a couple of times.
Speaker 4: But there's an account on Twitter that just basically covers
Speaker 4: nothing but the migrant rapes that happen in England, and
Speaker 4: there's basically a new one every single day.
Speaker 3: Wow. Well, in this particular one, this is the police
Speaker 3: getting a back after they failed to arrest an asylum
Speaker 3: seeker who entered an elderly woman's home. And this is
Speaker 3: I guess maybe the asylum he's seeking is an arkham.
Speaker 3: If you look at this guy, he is truly kind
Speaker 3: of crazy looking. If you look at the expression on
Speaker 3: his face. He's got his head down, his eyes were
Speaker 3: rolled up, his chin is down as he's talking to
Speaker 3: the policewoman there.
Speaker 4: London Metropolitan Bord deep citizen right there, exact type of
Speaker 4: person you want in your country.
Speaker 3: The asylum seeker housed at a hotel entered an elderly
Speaker 3: woman's home without permission, and then the police showed up
Speaker 3: and drove him back to his hotel and released him
Speaker 3: without arresting him. And this is all happening while we
Speaker 3: see things like a woman who's silently praying near an
Speaker 3: abortion clinic. She's now been arrested three times. She has
Speaker 3: taken court, taken the police to court, and the courts
Speaker 3: have said no, this is illegitimate her arrest and actually
Speaker 3: made the police department pay her compensation. And yet they've
Speaker 3: just done it again. They are absolutely going to shut
Speaker 3: this down. The man entered the property through an open
Speaker 3: door while being followed by a group of men. In
Speaker 3: the street who also walked in. Fortunately, no violence was done.
Speaker 3: They claim that no intent can be proven, so he
Speaker 3: was not arrested. But you know, actually somebody posted up
Speaker 3: they said, well, you know, there's actually a law about this. No,
Speaker 3: in the UK, anyone is not permitted to enter a
Speaker 3: private house without the explicit or implied consent of the
Speaker 3: homeowner or occupier. As you would imagine, unauthorized entry into
Speaker 3: private property is considered trespassing, a civil wrong. There are
Speaker 3: some exceptions, such as in emergencies or with a valid
Speaker 3: legal warrant, and I guess we could also include if
Speaker 3: you are a so called asylum seeker. But anyway, the
Speaker 3: response was very different for this guy. As a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, this is a video clip of what happened.
Speaker 10: Has just entered a lady's property. The officers, Yeah, it's
Speaker 10: not an offense. They're letting him go. They're letting him go. Officer,
Speaker 10: how is that? How is that not an offense? How
Speaker 10: is he not an offense in someone's house, regardless she
Speaker 10: didn't want him to the house. He's alarmed, distressions, you're
Speaker 10: letting him go.
Speaker 3: Let go. They should be ashamed of himself. Next thing,
Speaker 3: you know, they're gonna start wearing masks like the American
Speaker 3: federal cops.
Speaker 4: Regardless, he's done when they had their funny outsets on.
Speaker 5: He doesn't.
Speaker 3: Yeah, when they're bombies. They've adopted more of an American
Speaker 3: style approach.
Speaker 5: No, you're going to cause the war on the streets.
Speaker 3: You know, you know he's causing the war.
Speaker 5: On the streets.
Speaker 3: Carry guns were bulletproofest driving cars.
Speaker 10: Use a poosing a war on the streets, how use
Speaker 10: laying and go?
Speaker 5: And then of course America's gonna take a few pages
Speaker 5: from there. It's about futality.
Speaker 3: And offense and in a propy, I have your name.
Speaker 4: Do you think it's not an offense in a.
Speaker 10: Propy regardless if I entered.
Speaker 4: Your heart with your wife and kids, and.
Speaker 10: Now you're going to be angry and want to get
Speaker 10: me arrested, be angry, but you have to prove.
Speaker 3: Ye. It's the thing when I was black letter law trespassing,
Speaker 3: No they didn't, No, they didn't.
Speaker 5: All was in the house.
Speaker 3: I've got down for a ten to so you get
Speaker 3: the idea. People are just rightly angry about all that stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it used to be remember it was uh, what was
Speaker 3: his name Roger Williams had a song about the Bobby's
Speaker 3: Bobby's on by England swings like a pendulum duty. So
Speaker 3: Bobby's on bicycles two by two and they used to
Speaker 3: ride bicycles these to night carried guns. They used to
Speaker 3: have the tall helmets and everything, and they used to
Speaker 3: be polite. Well they're still very polite, even as they
Speaker 3: wrongfully arrest people and let criminals go. They're still known
Speaker 3: for their politeness. But all the rest of the stuff,
Speaker 3: it's gone by the way.
Speaker 4: Boots stomping on a face forever, followed by a very
Speaker 4: polite apology. Oh so sorry about that stamp.
Speaker 2: Stamp stamp.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's basically it isn't it. The response is marketably
Speaker 3: different towards protesters who are angry about the housing of
Speaker 3: asylum seekers in the area. Three demonstrators outside the Migrant
Speaker 3: hotel questioning why the man was not arrested, were themselves detained,
Speaker 3: including a twenty two year old woman facing multiple charges
Speaker 3: such as common assault on a security guard, possession of
Speaker 3: an offensive weapon, and a fray and afray. A Section
Speaker 3: thirty five dispersal order was issued, leading to the arrest
Speaker 3: of a twenty eight year old man and a fifty
Speaker 3: seven year old woman for breaching their order. So we're
Speaker 3: going to declare an emergency and then arrest everybody who's
Speaker 3: still here.
Speaker 5: So, of course, if you want to learn any more
Speaker 5: about that, go ahead and put your government issue ID
Speaker 5: and selfie on the you know, registry of whatever website
Speaker 5: has this, so that the government can see who's looking
Speaker 5: at it. According to our new bills to protect the children,
Speaker 5: of course.
Speaker 3: That's right. Yeah, they will arrest you for what you
Speaker 3: say about on social media, as well as showing up
Speaker 3: in the area to protest the migrant hotel that's there.
Speaker 3: The person who objected to his presence gets the book
Speaker 3: thrown at her while they do absolutely nothing to him.
Speaker 3: And as one person pointed out, yeah, this is you know,
Speaker 3: not your country. You've got to understand it's not your
Speaker 3: country anymore. And there you have the police jumping on
Speaker 3: a woman who's on the ground, and that truly is,
Speaker 3: like I said, that would absolutely be unthinkable. It used
Speaker 3: to be the joke about you know, uh, you know
Speaker 3: what what hell was like. It was like the uh,
Speaker 3: the British heaven would be, you know where the British
Speaker 3: or the police and the French are doing the cooking
Speaker 3: and all the rest of this stuff, and the Germans
Speaker 3: are doing the music. But hell is where.
Speaker 4: The British do the food, the fresh run the infrastructure,
Speaker 4: and the Germans are your police.
Speaker 3: But no, I think it's where the British are your police.
Speaker 3: That is uh they really turn to think. Of course,
Speaker 3: of Britain has put itself at the forefront of this
Speaker 3: technological takeover. People are openly talking about the prospect of
Speaker 3: civil war. The country has had enough. But those in
Speaker 3: HQ think the answer is a few lines of text,
Speaker 3: wrote one person. Conservative political commentator Sophie Cochrane said, so
Speaker 3: you're telling me this demonic looking man whom we know
Speaker 3: nothing about. This is this guy right here can walk
Speaker 3: into a woman's flat and not get arrested. Women are doomed,
Speaker 3: she said. And of course we see the two tier
Speaker 3: justice system in the UK all the time. One guy
Speaker 3: who was a counselor, a leftist counselor who was a
Speaker 3: part of the Labor Party, got up and called for
Speaker 3: cutting the throats of mass migration protesters. He's now been
Speaker 3: acquitted of all charges and set free. While Conservatives who
Speaker 3: expressed anti illegal immigration sentiment and tweets aren't still languishing
Speaker 3: in prison. As a matter of fact. You know this
Speaker 3: guy who got up and he said, we need to
Speaker 3: cut all their throats and get rid of them. They
Speaker 3: are disgusting Nazi fascists. Well they let him go. But
Speaker 3: a woman who put up a post complaining about the
Speaker 3: immigration stuff has now gotten thirty one months, nearly three years.
Speaker 5: And I can play the videos in the article if
Speaker 5: you want. I don't know if this is just going
Speaker 5: to be some rant from some.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I know we're going to get to I want
Speaker 3: to get to some AI before we run out of
Speaker 3: time here. So anyway, this woman got nearly three years,
Speaker 3: and they've taken up a collection on social media to
Speaker 3: help her and her family. On the day of the
Speaker 3: Southport stabbings, she posted on x mass deportation. Now set
Speaker 3: fire to all the hotels and if that makes me
Speaker 3: a racist, so be it. Now. You know the other
Speaker 3: guy again was saying to was it cut off their
Speaker 3: heads or something? And she's cut the throats and she
Speaker 3: is saying to burn down these hotels, that the government
Speaker 3: is using the house people. So they got her for
Speaker 3: racial hatred. She pled guilty and was given thirty one
Speaker 3: months in prison. She should have gone for a jury trial.
Speaker 3: I kind of think that maybe the jury did some
Speaker 3: jurdy nullification on the case of this other guy.
Speaker 4: Britain is so heavily non actually English, now she might
Speaker 4: not get a fair shake even a jury trial.
Speaker 3: That's true.
Speaker 4: It's so full of foreigners. There's no guarantee.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they're probably the ones who did the jury nullification
Speaker 3: for this other guy. So she got thirty one months
Speaker 3: in prison and they've taken up a collection for her
Speaker 3: and her family. They've gotten more than a hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars for her. While the counselor's words explicitly called for
Speaker 3: violent acts like cutting throats in a public setting, he
Speaker 3: walked free after a jury trial. She faced swift conviction
Speaker 3: for a single social media post that did not directly
Speaker 3: advocate physical harm in the same graphic manner. There you go.
Speaker 3: It's all preparation for civil war. And as a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, an off Guardian, which is a British news outlet,
Speaker 3: they did an article talking about previous civil wars that
Speaker 3: they've had, and of course England has had a civil war.
Speaker 3: They did cut the throat of a king that was
Speaker 3: there at the time, but things are getting really bad,
Speaker 3: and he says, you know, part of what happened with
Speaker 3: that was a massive change in the way land was structured.
Speaker 3: And he said, the parallel to today is that many
Speaker 3: of the people, the Yeomans, who were kind of the
Speaker 3: middle class at the time, they were benefiting from these
Speaker 3: land changes, and so they didn't do anything about it.
Speaker 3: It was only the poor people who were hurt by that.
Speaker 3: This is one of the reasons why the fourth turnings
Speaker 3: are usually economic and then become a war. And that
Speaker 3: is what we were racing full speed ahead two right now.
Speaker 3: So they've had their Guy Fox gunpowder plot, they've had
Speaker 3: the civil war there between Cromwell and the king and
Speaker 3: all the rest of this stuff, and many people are
Speaker 3: thinking that that is the type of thing that may
Speaker 3: happen again. The problem is that, well, there's a lot
Speaker 3: of frustration that doesn't seem to be any agreement in
Speaker 3: terms of principles. And again I don't see violence as
Speaker 3: an appropriate response. I think we need to look at
Speaker 3: ways that we can go around this system, and we
Speaker 3: need to create our own parallel society. And you know,
Speaker 3: it's not saying that's easy or even possible, but that
Speaker 3: needs to be what our focus is on instead of
Speaker 3: turning immediately to civil war. Well, we're going to take
Speaker 3: a short break and we're going to come back. By
Speaker 3: the way, this is one of the reasons why these
Speaker 3: people are so hell bent on doing censorship. I would
Speaker 3: just say we talked about this a little bit earlier briefly,
Speaker 3: DC Resident, and it's a right to protest the unconstitutional
Speaker 3: police roadblocks. This is an article from Reason. They said
Speaker 3: checkpoints for general crime control are illegal and they smack
Speaker 3: of a police state. I absolutely agree with that. You know,
Speaker 3: when you look at Trump's friend Rudy Giuliani, I think
Speaker 3: was at the center of all this stop and frisk stuff,
Speaker 3: where if the police didn't like the way you looked,
Speaker 3: that stopped their car, stop you and frisk you on
Speaker 3: the sidewalk in New York. I don't like that so
Speaker 3: called law enforcement approach. I think that it is lawless
Speaker 3: enforcement when they do this type of thing. But we're
Speaker 3: moving towards that very very quickly. NBC News and other
Speaker 3: outlets are board the more than one hundred protesters turned
Speaker 3: out Wednesday. The heckle federal law enforcement at a checkpoint
Speaker 3: in DC and to Warren drivers about the police ahead.
Speaker 3: Leaving aside the dubious overall legality of the White House's
Speaker 3: alleged takeover, supposedly about an emergency and an executive order,
Speaker 3: the use of such generalized roadblocks is obnoxious. They go
Speaker 3: on to talk about how the Supreme Court has made
Speaker 3: allowances for that if these roadblocks are set up as
Speaker 3: sobriety checkpoints. As somebody who's never been drunk, I take
Speaker 3: exception to be stopped by the police and having to
Speaker 3: prove that I'm sober to them. It's like, you know,
Speaker 3: I thought we had the presumption of innocence and that
Speaker 3: would include the presumption of sobriety unless you see otherwise
Speaker 3: from me. I've never agreed with all this stuff. And
Speaker 3: it just goes to show how the Supreme Court can
Speaker 3: throw us under the bus so easily. They sharply limited
Speaker 3: the use of police checkpoints. They can't be used as
Speaker 3: a pretext for general crime control activities. They can only
Speaker 3: be used to harass. They can't just be used to
Speaker 3: harass the community, which some people are saying is happening here.
Speaker 3: But it absolutely is being used for that. It's harassing
Speaker 3: the community when you do a roadblock and check people
Speaker 3: to see if they are sober as well. You know,
Speaker 3: did somebody report me as driving erratically? Did you see
Speaker 3: me driving erratically? The smell alcohol in my breath? I've
Speaker 3: reported when we were in Austin, they were really bad
Speaker 3: about that. Reported on a guy who's perfectly sober, and
Speaker 3: because he talked back to his masters in uniform, they
Speaker 3: took him down and did a forced, forced blood draw
Speaker 3: on him. I'm sure that the place is very sanitary
Speaker 3: where they did that as well. The police. But Scotus
Speaker 3: back in two thousand in a case out of Indianapolis
Speaker 3: said that they said that they can't sanction stops justified
Speaker 3: only by the journalized and ever present possible that interrogation
Speaker 3: and inspection may reveal that a motorist has committed some crime.
Speaker 3: And yet that's a great deal of what happens with
Speaker 3: the being pulled over. You know, it's, first of all,
Speaker 3: they're doing it for revenue. Secondly, it's a phishing expedition
Speaker 3: to see if they can find something else that's there.
Speaker 3: This is just expanding that. A Metropolitan Police Department spokesperson
Speaker 3: said that the roadblock was a quote traffic safety compliance checkpoint.
Speaker 3: They said a focus on car safety would arguably pass
Speaker 3: muster under the Supreme Court case. But then that raises
Speaker 3: a question of why federal agents would be enforcing routine
Speaker 3: traffic stops like that when that's not really what they're
Speaker 3: there for. They're for other things. The New York Times
Speaker 3: reported that the federal agents were running sobriety checkpoints, not
Speaker 3: vehicle safety checkpoints. It's hard to take any of these
Speaker 3: conflicting explanations very seriously. Instead, it appears that it is
Speaker 3: in keeping with President Trump's general can attempt for the
Speaker 3: people of DC. He's just interested in a campaign of harassment.
Speaker 3: He's got an act to grind with them. They wanted
Speaker 3: to lock him away. In twenty twenty two, a Mississippi
Speaker 3: Justice Center filed a lawsuit challenging Jackson, Mississippi's use of ticket,
Speaker 3: arrest and tow checkpoints, causing the city to overhaul its policies.
Speaker 3: In twenty nineteen, Madison County, Mississippi, also settled a lawsuit
Speaker 3: over police roadblocks that happened to appear predominantly in black neighborhoods.
Speaker 3: And of course Reason has talked about this a great deal.
Speaker 3: Most news outlets don't still last at forfeiture. There is
Speaker 3: another issue, and when you look at some of the
Speaker 3: places like Chicago, they target people who are poor. They
Speaker 3: target people have cars that are about worth about one
Speaker 3: thousand dollars, which is nothing today, because they know that
Speaker 3: these poor people are going to have to come up
Speaker 3: with nine hundred dollars to essentially start a legal proces says,
Speaker 3: to appeal the theft of their property by so called
Speaker 3: law enforcement officers. Several New England ACLU chapters successfully sued
Speaker 3: to shut down border Patrol checkpoints in New Hampshire in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, about one hundred miles from the Canadian border.
Speaker 3: The civil rights group argued that the Boarder Patrol was
Speaker 3: using the checkpoint to detain and search motorists well beyond
Speaker 3: its authority and far from its jurisdiction. Well, they have
Speaker 3: repeatedly said that they have jurisdiction one hundred miles from
Speaker 3: the border, and this is what we have to look
Speaker 3: forward to. All of these agencies, just like the TSA,
Speaker 3: are constantly expanding their reach that are like cancer that
Speaker 3: is eating into our country. During vehicle safety regulations, they're
Speaker 3: using these as a fig leaf to allow federal law
Speaker 3: enforcement to harass and investigate drivers, and this should not
Speaker 3: be tolerated by the courts. Well, they shouldn't be allowed,
Speaker 3: my opinion, to use safety as a fig leaf either
Speaker 3: to arrast drivers. All of this is awful, but a
Speaker 3: Free Thought Project says, as we mentioned earlier, this is
Speaker 3: about setting up martial law, one city at a time.
Speaker 3: Is how the emergency state operates in the open. Well, first,
Speaker 3: you might have a real but manageable problem that is
Speaker 3: then inflated into an existential crisis. Or if it's not
Speaker 3: a real problem, you can take something like the pandemic,
Speaker 3: which is totally fictional, and you can then create a
Speaker 3: fearful emergency out of that. If the problem is real,
Speaker 3: typically if you look at it, you find that it
Speaker 3: is the government that either created that problem or exacerbated
Speaker 3: that problem, and then they come in with their special protections.
Speaker 3: This is from the Rutherford Institute John White. He said
Speaker 3: it starts with a quote from HL Minkin who said,
Speaker 3: the whole practical, whole aim of practical policy is to
Speaker 3: keep the populace alarmed and hence clamorous, to be led
Speaker 3: to safety by an endless series of hobgoblins. Most of
Speaker 3: them imaginary. Why I quoted that many times during the pandemic.
Speaker 3: Every American should be alarmed by Trump's Liberation Day tactics,
Speaker 3: his theatrics, and his threats. This is no longer about
Speaker 3: partisan politics. It's no longer about wag the dog, distractions
Speaker 3: from the Epstein debacle, or even genuine national security concerns.
Speaker 3: This is martial law described and disguised as law and order,
Speaker 3: just like he did martial law disguised as health protection.
Speaker 3: Why would people ever give him a second chance? I mean,
Speaker 3: that was so clear, it was always medical martial law
Speaker 3: under Trump two point zero, the scent into outright tyranny
Speaker 3: is accelerating because, as I said, he is an accelerationist.
Speaker 3: He's there to make this move more quickly. They've only
Speaker 3: got a few years. They want to have their new
Speaker 3: society set up by twenty thirty, and it's twenty twenty
Speaker 3: five already. They've got to get this stuff underway. He
Speaker 3: is their guy. It was a time for him to
Speaker 3: be in place. Trump is taking aim yet another so
Speaker 3: called crisis by waging war on crime in the nation's capital.
Speaker 3: Whether the trigger is terrorism, civil unrest, economic instability, or
Speaker 3: public health the aim remains the same, expand the reach
Speaker 3: of the federal authority, justify more militarized policing, and condition
Speaker 3: the public to accept the suspension of rights in the
Speaker 3: name of national security. And I think the worst of
Speaker 3: this is yet to come. And when we look at
Speaker 3: the foundations being laid with these id bills, I think
Speaker 3: that truly is the case. He says, these are not
Speaker 3: isolate decisions. They're part of a coordinated playbook for bringing
Speaker 3: local jurisdictions under direct federal control, one crisis at a time,
Speaker 3: breaking the police states hostile take over the country and
Speaker 3: our constitution into a series of incremental moves. The administration
Speaker 3: side steps the broad public backlash that a single sweeping
Speaker 3: decoration of martial law would provide. I don't even know
Speaker 3: that that would do it. It certainly didn't do it
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty. That was to me the biggest disappointment,
Speaker 3: not so much that a politician would attempt to do it,
Speaker 3: but that he would get away with it, and that
Speaker 3: so many people in the media would put their career
Speaker 3: over the constitution and support him, telling you things like
Speaker 3: it's forty chess, don't worry, trust the plan, Trust Trump,
Speaker 3: that was the thing that really concerned me in twenty twenty. Well,
Speaker 3: we're going to take a quick break and when come back,
Speaker 3: we're going to get into AI and I'm going to
Speaker 3: let you take the lead on this. This is what
Speaker 3: you guys are really focused on. We're going to take
Speaker 3: a quick break. Stay with us. Will be right back.
Speaker 2: On Jordan listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about
Speaker 3: artificial intelligence, Travis. You know when we look at this stuff,
Speaker 3: and I think you reported last week about physicians who
Speaker 3: turned over a diagnostic tasks to AI and they found
Speaker 3: out that they're diagnostic abilities after feed very very quickly.
Speaker 3: You know, I've talked about that for the longest time.
Speaker 3: You have London taxi drivers who had to do what
Speaker 3: they call it, do the knowledge. And you know, London
Speaker 3: is fragmented into all these tiny little streets that in
Speaker 3: the days when people walked everywhere or rode a horse,
Speaker 3: you know, that have a short street and it would
Speaker 3: change name and then as things kind of got interconnected,
Speaker 3: they're constantly changing names, and so it was a very
Speaker 3: very complicated large city to get around and with all
Speaker 3: these different names, you know, it wasn't like you've got
Speaker 3: first street that runs north and south for a long
Speaker 3: ways and then you've got avenues that run east and west,
Speaker 3: or there are some cities that are like that. But
Speaker 3: you know, these guys would study for a long time,
Speaker 3: riding a bicycle so they could learn the names of
Speaker 3: the streets and anything. Then they were evaluated and they
Speaker 3: could actually see that their brain, a particular part of
Speaker 3: their brain had actually enlarged that allowed them, you know,
Speaker 3: memory in terms of, you know, remembering this stuff and
Speaker 3: also being able to map it out. But the converse
Speaker 3: of that is also true. And it reminds me of
Speaker 3: a movie I saw many years ago. I'm sure you
Speaker 3: haven't seen it, called a New Leaf. I don't think
Speaker 3: it would.
Speaker 4: Heard of it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't think that it would hold up today.
Speaker 3: But as Walter Mathow, who you probably don't also don't know,
Speaker 3: but he was in the original movie version of The
Speaker 3: Odd Couple, again another cultural reference that you wouldn't know.
Speaker 3: Walter Mathow played this guy who sees this woman who
Speaker 3: is a total klutz. She can't do anything. She's stumbling, dropping,
Speaker 3: knocking things over, spilling things constantly, and totally addle brained.
Speaker 3: But she's got a large trust fund, and so he
Speaker 3: zeros in on her. He's going to marry her for
Speaker 3: her money, and he does that. But then in the
Speaker 3: process of it, you see a transformation as he starts
Speaker 3: to have to take care of her, and he starts
Speaker 3: to get kind of paternal and he's guarding her and
Speaker 3: all of a sudden and it completely transforms him to
Speaker 3: have that responsibility. But what we're seeing is Ai is
Speaker 3: exact opposite. It is turning us into what she is.
Speaker 4: Like you know in the movie, these incompetent rubes that
Speaker 4: are incapable of doing anything. That's your number of people.
Speaker 4: Whenever I'm on Twitter now, under every single post, there's
Speaker 4: someone saying, Hey, Grock, summarize this for me.
Speaker 3: Just I can't think. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I think the mental image to have here is the
Speaker 5: Wally Carts with the big fat guys, Like, yeah, you
Speaker 5: see the effects when you remove all physical exercise and
Speaker 5: just sit back and let machines do everything for you. You
Speaker 5: would find up like the big fat people in Wally
Speaker 5: But you're having sort of a mental version of that
Speaker 5: happening with Ai.
Speaker 3: That's right, same thing happens with the brains. If we
Speaker 3: don't exercise. As a matter of fact, that was a
Speaker 3: key part of my physical therapy was, you know, to
Speaker 3: give you things to do to train your hand. You know,
Speaker 3: my hand wouldn't move, and that was the issue. Was
Speaker 3: really strange. I had the stroke. I couldn't get my
Speaker 3: left hand to move, you know. That's how I fell
Speaker 3: out of the chair the first time. It's like, I'm thinking,
Speaker 3: you know, command, see, and it wouldn't do it. And
Speaker 3: I kind of look at my hand and mentally I
Speaker 3: shouted at it, come on, control, see you know I didn't.
Speaker 3: All right, I'll do it with my right hand. I
Speaker 3: reached over and at that point I fell out of
Speaker 3: the chair. That's when you heard me. But Deesebusters, thank
Speaker 3: you very much. That is very generous. I appreciate that,
Speaker 3: he says, so good to see you, David. A special
Speaker 3: thanks to Travis, Lance and Karen for keeping the show on. Yes,
Speaker 3: and they did it without any prodding from me. Thank
Speaker 3: you so much, Travis. You know, Travis and Lance came
Speaker 3: to me, and I can understand because I never had
Speaker 3: any interest in getting in front of the camera either,
Speaker 3: and it was kind of forced upon me out of necessity.
Speaker 3: Uh and uh, but uh and they did as well.
Speaker 3: They didn't I didn't ask them at all. I knew
Speaker 3: that they could do it, but I also knew that
Speaker 3: it wasn't something that they necessarily were interested in. So
Speaker 3: I really do appreciate you doing that. So don't worry.
Speaker 3: We got the show covered and we're going to do it.
Speaker 3: And they just started doing it. Or really do aciate that.
Speaker 3: And all three of them have worked so hard, especially
Speaker 3: to help me as well, and I just want to
Speaker 3: thank all of you for the encouragement, the support, and
Speaker 3: especially the prayers. And I want to give God the
Speaker 3: glory for this, because as we look at this, the
Speaker 3: things that happened at the hospital did not really help.
Speaker 3: They actually hurt. You know, the third third stroke I
Speaker 3: had was induced by the operation that I now in
Speaker 3: retrospect believe was absolutely unnecessary. And the damage don to
Speaker 3: the nerve under my tongue, which is just now starting
Speaker 3: to come back, and the damage that's also done to
Speaker 3: my vocal cords, all of that was predicated on that.
Speaker 3: After I got through with the actually the second stroke,
Speaker 3: the first one I think was just a tia second stroke,
Speaker 3: they took me to the hospital and before the doctor
Speaker 3: came on at a teleconference, I was able to talk
Speaker 3: and communicate with them, so I said, well, there's nothing
Speaker 3: we're going to do. But you know, they didn't really
Speaker 3: have anything. So we've got a very dangerous medication we
Speaker 3: could give you, but we don't need to do that.
Speaker 3: Take the rest. And it's like good, this guy's good.
Speaker 3: But they don't really have anything there to help you.
Speaker 3: But you know, they will always try to come up
Speaker 3: with something that they could do, whether it's going to
Speaker 3: help you or not. You know, first, do no harm
Speaker 3: should be the approach, but that's not really the approach
Speaker 3: that happens with it. But when I got to finished.
Speaker 5: There are all the psays about if someone's having a stroke,
Speaker 5: you need to act real fast, you get him to
Speaker 5: the hospital immediately. Time is of the essence. It's all
Speaker 5: about speed, speed, speed, And that's kind of one of
Speaker 5: the classic tells of a con is you know it's
Speaker 5: a limited time. I mean, I know it's there's more
Speaker 5: to it, but they didn't have anything, like we rushed
Speaker 5: you in. It's like my dad's having a stroke and
Speaker 5: they're like okay, and it's like all right, we'll do something.
Speaker 3: Well, they took some images of it, you know, and
Speaker 3: then they say, yeah, yeah, I sup, he's having okay.
Speaker 3: You know, there are some things that you can do.
Speaker 3: By the way, methylene blue has been found to be
Speaker 3: very effective if it's given within I don't know, you know,
Speaker 3: forty eight hours or something like that. But of course
Speaker 3: they didn't do that. They wouldn't give me any vitamins
Speaker 3: anything like that. And we did take methylene blue. What
Speaker 3: horrible tasting stuff that is. Took it in the liquid format.
Speaker 3: That is bad.
Speaker 4: It's unpleasant, it's not good. It tastes very, very strange
Speaker 4: and bad.
Speaker 3: It was like licking the inside of a dirty shoe,
Speaker 3: the way dirty shoe smells. It was awful.
Speaker 4: Also, it just dies your mouth blue when you're finishing,
Speaker 4: it looks like you ate a smurf by the time here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I tried that. I tried red light therapy.
Speaker 3: I mean, if it's something that's not going to be harmful,
Speaker 3: and I think the red light therapy really did help
Speaker 3: quite a bit, and perhaps a methylene blue did as well.
Speaker 3: But you know, I'm open to things that are not harmful.
Speaker 3: The reason it's a good reason to give it a try.
Speaker 3: But I really do appreciate all of your support, and
Speaker 3: I just mentioned all that and go through this whole thing,
Speaker 3: because it wasn't It wasn't the hospitals that really helped.
Speaker 3: They harmed. Uh. And it is God who is capable
Speaker 3: of healing. And part of the healing that is there
Speaker 3: again is using these things. And I said, you know,
Speaker 3: use your hand, use your use your tongue, use all
Speaker 3: this stuff. And that's what AI is trying to do
Speaker 3: to pacify us, to have us not use all of
Speaker 3: those things. Delta Gold thank you for the tip and
Speaker 3: says glad to see you back. God bless you and
Speaker 3: the work you obviously have been chosen to do. You're
Speaker 3: waking up people me as an example both the God
Speaker 3: and the times that we live in. My name is
Speaker 3: jezz Jezusi Gronkowitz, So thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 3: Chevkin says as a kid, I wanted to visit England.
Speaker 3: Definitely not now. Yeah, we went when.
Speaker 4: We were young, and it's just I've always thought about
Speaker 4: going back, but now just that England has gone, it
Speaker 4: doesn't exist anymore.
Speaker 3: Well, the England we took you to in two thousand
Speaker 3: and one, it was not the England that Karen and
Speaker 3: I went to in nineteen eighties. We went a couple
Speaker 3: of times and we spent a great deal of time
Speaker 3: in England. It was it was wonderful. We didn't have
Speaker 3: any money at the time, but we did have time
Speaker 3: before I started my job, and so we just went
Speaker 3: to free museums and things like that all the time,
Speaker 3: and it was great. We both had a wonderful time
Speaker 3: and the people were very nice in the city. But
Speaker 3: when we went back in two thousand and one, it
Speaker 3: was a big city and it was now you know,
Speaker 3: different ethnic groups pitted against others, and you know, it
Speaker 3: was a very very different feel and we ran into
Speaker 3: some people that were kind of what you would expect
Speaker 3: to find in a large city.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, I got the I got something I
Speaker 4: think it was the flu on the flight over, and
Speaker 4: so for about a week and a half, two weeks,
Speaker 4: I was just out of it. I was barely conscious
Speaker 4: staggering around and I fell on the steps when I
Speaker 4: was climbing them from coming up from the subway. And
Speaker 4: there was this guy and he was obviously in a
Speaker 4: bad way because he had a broken leg in a cast,
Speaker 4: and my pinky finger just barely grazed his cast and
Speaker 4: he went ballistic. He grabbed me under the arm and
Speaker 4: dragged me up the stairs and I'm just out of it,
Speaker 4: like what's going on here?
Speaker 3: Yeah, we were ahead of you, and I remember turning
Speaker 3: around and it's like, how dare this guy do that?
Speaker 3: But yeah, it was just the opposite happened when Karen
Speaker 3: and I were there in nineteen eighty. We had a
Speaker 3: Britrail pass and we hadn't gotten it validated in the
Speaker 3: proper way. We didn't know that we needed to go
Speaker 3: to the main office and do it, so we were
Speaker 3: We used it on this trip. It was the first
Speaker 3: time we were using it. And this foreign conductor he
Speaker 3: was nomgreat. He gave us a really hard time and
Speaker 3: I said, well, I can show you our ticket, show
Speaker 3: you that we just got here. I haven't you know,
Speaker 3: even if you know, you think that we've been using
Speaker 3: this from day one, it's not. It still would be valid.
Speaker 3: And there was a middle aged lady who was across
Speaker 3: the island. She said, see, yeah, you'd leave these young
Speaker 3: people alone. It's how dare you coming to a country
Speaker 3: like this? And you know, and so she just and
Speaker 3: he cowed down. She was a classic. It was a
Speaker 3: classic character, and she really cowed this guy down. And
Speaker 3: we said, well, thank you very much for standing up
Speaker 3: for us, appreciate that. She said, no problem at all,
Speaker 3: honor of Britain and all, you know, And it was
Speaker 3: we were running into people like that. We were running
Speaker 3: into the people who were there during World War Two
Speaker 3: who fought the Battle of Britain. Those those were the
Speaker 3: people that we were coming across most of the time,
Speaker 3: and they were a different, different group of people. By
Speaker 3: design that they've done there, Aldi Modern Retro Radio, roadblox
Speaker 3: and checkpoints are clearly a Fourth Amendment violation. You and
Speaker 3: I agree on that they should not have any kind
Speaker 3: of a roadblock for any kind of a purpose unless
Speaker 3: you've got a situation that you know, they've they've got
Speaker 3: to be on the lookout for a bank robber who's
Speaker 3: just left and he's gone down this road, so they're
Speaker 3: gonna stop people and look at him or something like that.
Speaker 3: I you know, they they got a reason for that,
Speaker 3: but not with these other things that they do. Aldimander
Speaker 3: Retro Radio, again, thank you for the tip. That is
Speaker 3: very generous and we will definitely keep you in our prayers.
Speaker 3: Thank you for doing that. I appreciate that. Thank you
Speaker 3: for your support. He said, God has got this in
Speaker 3: terms of his job, and I agree. You know, think
Speaker 3: of it this way. If we'll pray for God's protection
Speaker 3: for you, he may have something even better for you
Speaker 3: down the road. That's the way we feel about things
Speaker 3: that have happened to us that look difficult at the time.
Speaker 3: A Syrian girl no intent. Why would he ever enter
Speaker 3: another person's house and buy Yeah, but you can't do
Speaker 3: that without punishment in the country that he came from.
Speaker 3: She said. Those cops know that they're doing wrong. Look
Speaker 3: at their body language. Yes, they're very sheepish about that.
Speaker 3: And Cecilia fourteen says David, I don't know if you
Speaker 3: covered this yet, but they've now approved a flu mist
Speaker 3: very dangerous shedding for twenty eight days. By the way. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they're gonna, you know, spray it. They're gonna put it
Speaker 3: in our food supply and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 3: Fidgiti guy says methylene blue has a blue label warning
Speaker 3: from the FDA, the ICE warning available for non prescription drugs.
Speaker 3: Medical studies and rodents have shown that methylene blue causes tumors,
Speaker 3: liver or thyroid well I didn't do that much of it,
Speaker 3: but thank you for the warning. We'll pass that along
Speaker 3: to people. It's I thought it was a strange thing,
Speaker 3: but it really did awaken my tongue. I think that
Speaker 3: red light therapy is, of all the different things that
Speaker 3: I did, I think that's my face and the one
Speaker 3: that we could definitely tell made a difference, and it
Speaker 3: made a big difference with Karen's knee and her pain
Speaker 3: as well. Also helps with muscle recovery. And if you
Speaker 3: stop and think about it, it makes sense because vitamin
Speaker 3: D is something that our body manufactures in response to sunlight,
Speaker 3: and you know, this is another wavelength and they kind
Speaker 3: of tuned in a couple of different wavelengths and a
Speaker 3: near infrared spectrum that they have noticed are very effective
Speaker 3: in terms of pain relief and sometimes in terms of healing.
Speaker 3: They can also activate mitochondrial mitochondria in the same way
Speaker 3: that methylene blue is alleged to have done, so that's
Speaker 3: very important.
Speaker 5: And yeah, there's the claim that it is carcinogenic, which
Speaker 5: it might be. I don't know. I haven't done too
Speaker 5: much research on it, but a lot of it is
Speaker 5: what we saw with the horse medication. A Yeah, back
Speaker 5: with all that, how they want to discredit anything that
Speaker 5: they can't you know, patent and sell it absurd profit
Speaker 5: margins and things that aren't going to actually be harmful
Speaker 5: to get people coming back to the hospitals.
Speaker 3: That's right. Yeah, I wouldn't take ibmctin as a prophylactic,
Speaker 3: but if I had a very bad cold, I think
Speaker 3: it's probably pretty effective for that. And it is something
Speaker 3: that has been used for sixty years and people it's
Speaker 3: got a pretty long history on that. They were trying
Speaker 3: to shut that down because people are using it simply
Speaker 3: because people are using it off label, meaning that the
Speaker 3: drug itself have been evaluated for safety, and they'd evaluate
Speaker 3: it for they said for efficacy for certain things, improved
Speaker 3: it for that. However, this is taking that drug and
Speaker 3: using it for a different purpose than they have tested
Speaker 3: it for. So that was what the big, the big
Speaker 3: issue was. But of course we know they should point
Speaker 3: out it's about profits, so you're always going to see that.
Speaker 3: Bottom line is you need to do your own research.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's what I say. It's we don't know if
Speaker 5: it's good or not. We have medical professionals. Before you
Speaker 5: take nethholee and blue, look into it for yourself.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 4: I also think, just you know anything, there comes a
Speaker 4: point where what you're going through maybe worse than even
Speaker 4: the bad side effects that come with some of their
Speaker 4: horrific drugs. Yeah, you shouldn't, I think, have the freedom
Speaker 4: to take some of even these dangerous, awful things that
Speaker 4: they push on people. They shouldn't push them. They shouldn't
Speaker 4: force people to take.
Speaker 3: The key is informed.
Speaker 4: You should know what you're getting into. You should be
Speaker 4: able to have the option if your life is you know,
Speaker 4: the quality of life is greatly degraded, and you think
Speaker 4: it's worth it to take some of this stuff, maybe
Speaker 4: it helps. I think that you should be allowed to
Speaker 4: make that decision. But it has to be your decision,
Speaker 4: and you need to be able to look at the
Speaker 4: box and say, okay, this is going to do this, this, this, this,
Speaker 4: this and this, and then make that assessment for yourself.
Speaker 3: I've always felt that way. You know, if you got
Speaker 3: something like terminal cancer, why wouldn't they allow somebody to
Speaker 3: take a drug. And of course that's exactly what they're
Speaker 3: doing in Japan. It's what Mark Hall is why he's
Speaker 3: going to Japan to interview them. They look at something,
Speaker 3: they evaluate to see if it's harmful. If it's not harmful, yeah,
Speaker 3: of course you can take it and you become a
Speaker 3: data point for us to see whether it is effective.
Speaker 3: That is a rational approach, But we don't do that
Speaker 3: in the United States. The pharmaceutical companies are free to
Speaker 3: do anything FDA, but not you.
Speaker 4: You get no freedoms.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's right. Well, let's take a look at AI.
Speaker 3: We got AI powered radar can now spy on your
Speaker 3: phone calls from ten feet away. By Brian dev McCartney.
Speaker 3: Just heard not so good things about methylene blue. It
Speaker 3: stains your organs and deteriorates them after many uses. Well,
Speaker 3: I guess that's good. That tasted so bad because I
Speaker 3: didn't use it that much.
Speaker 4: You're not going to get addicted to it.
Speaker 3: No, you definitely wouldn't.
Speaker 5: It doesn't do anything, so there are definitely side effects.
Speaker 5: The thing is, there are also side effects to these
Speaker 5: other drugs. Basically all of them have pretty horrendous side effects.
Speaker 5: I don't know. Maybe methylene blue is as bad as
Speaker 5: the others. Yeah, maybe not. But it is also been
Speaker 5: shown to be very beneficial in recovering from a stroke. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and there are a few other applications where it does
Speaker 5: have beneficial uses. So don't treat it like candy and
Speaker 5: take it for whatever ails you. But at the same time,
Speaker 5: I think there are legitimate uses for it. Like we
Speaker 5: were just saying, I agree, you're okay with that risk.
Speaker 3: I didn't see anything in terms of a stroke after
Speaker 3: you know it, after your brain cells have been killed.
Speaker 3: I didn't see anything that they said helps to alleviate that,
Speaker 3: except for the methylene blue. But of course, the one
Speaker 3: thing that does help with that is to use it.
Speaker 3: You have this thing called brain plasticity. Just as we
Speaker 3: were saying, you know your brain, think of it like
Speaker 3: a muscle. If you don't use it, at atrophies, but
Speaker 3: if you do use it, it can get stronger. And
Speaker 3: that's one of the things that they've said. They've noticed
Speaker 3: brain plasticity and infants who maybe they had some brain
Speaker 3: damage or a stroke or something like that at a
Speaker 3: young age. And while they can identify one side of
Speaker 3: the brain or the other as being primarily used for
Speaker 3: language issues, they found that infants who had that side
Speaker 3: of their brain messed up would basically have those functions
Speaker 3: replaced on the other side of their brain. So you know,
Speaker 3: God has made us in wonderful ways. And that's one
Speaker 3: of the things I took away from all this stuff.
Speaker 3: You know, we take so much stuff for granted in
Speaker 3: our bodies that we don't even think about. I mean,
Speaker 3: there's all these things that are happening at a subliminal
Speaker 3: level in your body that you're not even aware of.
Speaker 3: You're not even thinking, you're not even trying to tell
Speaker 3: your hand move. But when you get to the point
Speaker 3: where your hand doesn't move and you're trying to tell
Speaker 3: it to move, like I said, first first shower I took,
Speaker 3: I put some champepoo on my left hand and put
Speaker 3: up on my head and I'm just thinking it's going
Speaker 3: to start, you know, doing this thing, and it just
Speaker 3: sat down on the side of my head. It's like,
Speaker 3: gonna move this hand. When you start to see things
Speaker 3: like that, you realize just how fearfully and wonderfully made
Speaker 3: we are. I don't know how anybody could look at
Speaker 3: the human body and not think that it was designed
Speaker 3: by intelligence. You have to understand that intelligent design is
Speaker 3: a no brainer. The question is has God spoken to
Speaker 3: us through his son that is a question with eternal
Speaker 3: issues involved in it, but the idea that there is
Speaker 3: a God, an intelligent designer. Even atheists have come up
Speaker 3: with their own theories, Oh we had panspermia came here
Speaker 3: and started the race and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 3: But it truly is amazing. And when you start to
Speaker 3: see your body break down like that, and it really
Speaker 3: does make you wonder at what God has really accomplished.
Speaker 3: It truly is astounding to see it and to see
Speaker 3: how delicate it is. And that's what has really put
Speaker 3: me off of hospital because that is kind of like
Speaker 3: somebody rushing through this china shop with all this very
Speaker 3: delicate stuff on the shelves and breaking everything as they go.
Speaker 3: That's kind of the way it is when they do
Speaker 3: an operation on you. But let's get to the AI
Speaker 3: AI powered radar spying on your phone calls from ten
Speaker 3: feet away.
Speaker 4: To me, this is almost you know, it's interesting, but
Speaker 4: also a little redundant. If they want to know what
Speaker 4: your phone calls are, they can simply go and ask, like, hey,
Speaker 4: give us a record of everything this guy's ever said
Speaker 4: and done, mister Verizon. Verizon will turn it over.
Speaker 3: This Yeah, when I talked to William Bennie, he said,
Speaker 3: it's not like you know, of course, Michael Hayden said, well,
Speaker 3: we're not out there listening to your phone calls and
Speaker 3: and your text messages. And William Bennie, who was the
Speaker 3: former technical head of the NSSA globally for a very
Speaker 3: long time and became a whistleblower, he said, of course not.
Speaker 3: He said, the metadata is far more useful than going
Speaker 3: through and trying to parse somebody's conversations or their texts
Speaker 3: or whatever. The metadata can be used by people like
Speaker 3: Alex Carpett Pellanteer to determine what you're going to do next,
Speaker 3: and who your friends are, and what your religious and
Speaker 3: political beliefs are. They can infer all of that from
Speaker 3: the metadata and.
Speaker 4: Then figure out what you're going to do before you
Speaker 4: even know you're going to do it.
Speaker 3: That's that's right.
Speaker 4: That's things companies have already achieved. So I see this
Speaker 4: as an interesting headline to look at, but I don't
Speaker 4: think this gives them any more information than they already had.
Speaker 5: Well, I don't know. It's the advancement of technology is
Speaker 5: going to find uses in espionage, Like they could have
Speaker 5: places where they're monitoring all the calls made in an area.
Speaker 5: I mean, granted, they could do that with software as well,
Speaker 5: but this is just yet another tool of surveillance that
Speaker 5: they are going to be using against.
Speaker 4: They could put these radar microphones or whatever they are
Speaker 4: up in any sort of public space and assert that, well,
Speaker 4: you have no assumption of privacy there anyway, and as such,
Speaker 4: we are free to monitor, capture, and record every conversation
Speaker 4: you have in this area.
Speaker 3: Oh but the police have their privacy. You can't tape
Speaker 3: them in many places they maintain well, you know, Stingray
Speaker 3: done by Harris Corporation has been doing this type of tracking.
Speaker 4: You know again, that's what it immediately brought to mind
Speaker 4: for me as well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, basically looking at your cell phone signal and
Speaker 3: inferring all this kind of metadata and you know geotracking
Speaker 3: that they're doing with that. The key thing that AI
Speaker 3: is doing. AI allows them to data mine and to
Speaker 3: correlate all this stuff together, to assimilate it in ways.
Speaker 3: In the past, they had this big haystack of stuff
Speaker 3: and they couldn't find the needles in it. Now they
Speaker 3: can find the needles in it, and they can sort
Speaker 3: this out very very quickly using AI. That's what it
Speaker 3: brings to the party, not in terms of surveillance or
Speaker 3: eavesdropping necessarily, but in terms of, you know, making sense
Speaker 3: out of it and summarizing it for them.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's I mean, when they built those data centers earlier,
Speaker 4: because they knew the sort of thing was coming down
Speaker 4: the pipeline. We'll just hold on to it for now.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's right you think of it. It's not an
Speaker 5: increase or improvement in the quality of the microphones and
Speaker 5: radar that they're using. It's just a matter of being
Speaker 5: able to take all that little bits of data that
Speaker 5: they couldn't decipher before, and now they can parse it
Speaker 5: and listen to your calls.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 5: That same leverage technology can be used in a lot
Speaker 5: of ways.
Speaker 3: I remember back in the nineteen eighties when we're trying
Speaker 3: to get a handle on some of the things that
Speaker 3: were happening at the state level, and we did a
Speaker 3: four request and we got a They just dumped this
Speaker 3: massive amount of data to us. It's almost like they
Speaker 3: flattened it all out, had no structure or organization or whatever.
Speaker 3: It's like here you go, fish, Yeah, here's all your data.
Speaker 3: Now try to make sense of it. And that's really
Speaker 3: what the AI does for them. The sad thing is
Speaker 3: is that at the same time, you know, they are
Speaker 3: increasing the range at which they can listen to us,
Speaker 3: the range at which they can watch us, and all
Speaker 3: the rest of this stuff, at the same time that
Speaker 3: they're increasing the ability to collate. And it makes sense
Speaker 3: out of all this stuff. It truly is a very
Speaker 3: concerning thing. As I said before, when you look at
Speaker 3: people like Alex Scarp, that's what his corporation was about.
Speaker 3: That's why his corporation was funded by the CIA. It
Speaker 3: was Incutel that helped to push that out there. Many
Speaker 3: people they love to talk about Peter Tell, but they
Speaker 3: don't talk about the CIA and Ink you Tell, the
Speaker 3: venture capital firm of the CIA that helps make all
Speaker 3: that stuff possible. And when you look at Alex Karp again,
Speaker 3: what a dangerous the status person he is. Truly is
Speaker 3: amazing to see the mind of the people behind all
Speaker 3: this stuff. You know the quote, and there's gonna be
Speaker 3: tons of quotes out of that book that are going
Speaker 3: to come up that are going to be there forever,
Speaker 3: just like the quotes that we've heard from Henry Kissinger
Speaker 3: he's kind of taken his position.
Speaker 4: I guess there's always one guy that's like that, at
Speaker 4: least one in any administration.
Speaker 3: They all have their.
Speaker 4: Advisor to the hand of the King, whatever you want
Speaker 4: to call it, some guy that sits there he's like, yes,
Speaker 4: my lord, you must do this.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Well there's an article red or blue AI is
Speaker 3: coming for you. And that's kind of interesting is they
Speaker 3: point out one of the things that the job's most
Speaker 3: likely to be displaced by AI fit the profile of
Speaker 3: the college educated elite who are backing all this stuff.
Speaker 3: This is also nothing new. I remember that I've talked
Speaker 3: for over a decade about the survey that was done
Speaker 3: in South Korea where they looked at the threats to
Speaker 3: different jobs, and they found that while there'd be menial
Speaker 3: tasks that you'd have forty to fifty percent of the
Speaker 3: jobs lost with AI and robotics, for white collar positions
Speaker 3: like lawyers and doctors, they put that at seventy percent
Speaker 3: at the highest.
Speaker 4: Rate, considering every doctor I've ever been to is basically
Speaker 4: just ready computer print out.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I look at the table.
Speaker 4: Yeah what does this mean? Yeah, oh, this is what
Speaker 4: it means. Yeah, computer can do that. For you really easy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's put in the symptoms and then we'll recommend
Speaker 3: which Pfizer drug you're supposed to get. That's exactly it. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: you know that's the key thing. It's like red or
Speaker 3: blue AI is coming for you. Well that that kind
Speaker 3: of rhymes, you know, like roses are red and violence. Anyway,
Speaker 3: we need to realize that red or blue a solitarian
Speaker 3: police state is also coming for you. And so all
Speaker 3: these not just AI, but it's the kind of moves
Speaker 3: that Trump is doing in Washington, d C. Or the
Speaker 3: things like that. Whenever you as because of your tribalism,
Speaker 3: whenever you excuse your guy or your gal doing this
Speaker 3: or that, just understand that the other team is now
Speaker 3: going to use this new precedent to come after you
Speaker 3: given a certain amount of time. That's what's so depressing
Speaker 3: about watching these maga people who have never paid attention
Speaker 3: to politics in their life before Donald Trump came along,
Speaker 3: and they don't realize is the bigger picture here.
Speaker 4: That's one of the things about leftists is there more
Speaker 4: than willing to allow an authoritarian state to come up
Speaker 4: on the right because they know eventually they'll get their
Speaker 4: turn to utilize it. Wow, they're mostly okay with it.
Speaker 3: We're already out of time. That went by very very quickly.
Speaker 3: Time flies, Yes, it really does. Thank you all for
Speaker 3: joining us. Thank you for your support and your prayers.
Speaker 3: And we have a comment here from a guard about
Speaker 3: the red light therapy. So the politicians want us to
Speaker 3: take the gaslight therapy. That's right, that's good. They're constantly
Speaker 3: doing the gaslight Thank you, Guard. Liberty conspiracy people check
Speaker 3: them out this evening. Everybody th Friday, Thank you for
Speaker 3: joining us. Have a good day. The common man, they
Speaker 3: created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 3: common past, track and control us. They're Commons project to
Speaker 3: make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 3: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 3: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 3: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 3: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 3: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 3: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 3: time to turn that around and expose that's what they
Speaker 3: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 3: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 3: thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 3: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com