Speaker 1: Okay, we're in the middle of November. What the heck happened?
Speaker 2: Man, It seems like we just started and we are
Speaker 2: going to be flying to Guatemala City at the end
Speaker 2: of the month. Everyone gathers, some explorers gather with me
Speaker 2: in Guatemala City for twelve to thirteen day discovery of
Speaker 2: some of the most amazing may insights in the world.
Speaker 2: And we're talking to Call and Elmador and some other
Speaker 2: smaller sites. But we don't really know the inception date
Speaker 2: for these places because they're extremely old. And what a
Speaker 2: lot of people don't recognize is that when the conquistadors
Speaker 2: the Spanish arrived to the New World, which is North America,
Speaker 2: Mexico and Central America, what they were looking at were
Speaker 2: the descendants of the great builders of these cities like
Speaker 2: t Call. And I didn't recognize this until I was
Speaker 2: mentored by an elder, a man named Humbat's Men. I
Speaker 2: talk about him in my upcoming book, The Mayan Controversy,
Speaker 2: and he told me that what we experience, or what
Speaker 2: the Spanish experienced, were not only the descendants, but they
Speaker 2: had evolved into sacrificial blood sports, human sacrifice and so forth,
Speaker 2: and so on because they didn't have any guidance and
Speaker 2: the great minds behind these ancient cities. This was a
Speaker 2: whole different type of a person. There was a whole
Speaker 2: different type of Homo sapien. In fact, it's widely thought
Speaker 2: that what the archaeological community looks at today isn't anything
Speaker 2: close to what the people were who actually designed and engineered.
Speaker 1: Many of the Great cities. This is a true The
Speaker 1: Maya are a true pyramid culture, and it's beginning to
Speaker 1: show that we need to be more cognizant of unseen
Speaker 1: forces like telluric energy. I talk about tleric feels all
Speaker 1: the time we had Christine on the program. Chris is
Speaker 1: talking about tleric energy coming out of the Great Pyramid.
Speaker 1: The ancient Egyptians, the Dynastic, prior to the Dynastics, the
Speaker 1: pre Dynastic people were very astute at collecting, energizing, and
Speaker 1: disseminating energy. We don't know how it was distributed because
Speaker 1: there's nothing left of any of the transferred devices. If
Speaker 1: they were coils, or if they were two's, if they
Speaker 1: were stone, we don't know. So advanced to our understanding
Speaker 1: of science that we can only guess now, but we
Speaker 1: do know from the little bit we've obtained that the
Speaker 1: Maya not only were a pyramid culture, but according to
Speaker 1: a number of elders at their capacity, at the highest capacity,
Speaker 1: there were over fifty five thousand pyramid cities from Honduras
Speaker 1: to the middle of Mexico that would be the Yucatan Peninsula. Hey,
Speaker 1: this is cliff from Earth ancients and today we are
Speaker 1: going to discover the genius of the Maya in their
Speaker 1: books which are otherwise known as codises. And I've had
Speaker 1: a chance to see and we've talked to Ed Barnhardt,
Speaker 1: doctor Barnhardt about thirty or so known excavation of cities
Speaker 1: that are considered Maya in Mexico, in Central America. But
Speaker 1: if there were fifty five thousand, that's a scratch, that's
Speaker 1: a tip of the iceberg. That's one percent or less.
Speaker 1: And that's not even talking, that's not even considering what
Speaker 1: this lightar scan unveiled back in twenty eighteen when they
Speaker 1: scanned the Guatemalan biosphere and found sixty thousand, six zero
Speaker 1: three three zero zero zero unknown communities, civic areas, pyramids
Speaker 1: and so on that have never never been seen before.
Speaker 1: And one of the things by the way that a
Speaker 1: lot of people don't know about is there are very
Speaker 1: unusual shaped pyramids and temples, which represents a whole different
Speaker 1: aspect of the Maya. Now, a lot of people believe
Speaker 1: in what we're told by the archaeological community is that
Speaker 1: the ma are approximately three thousand years old. Well, I've
Speaker 1: been going to Yucatan and to Mexico for over three decades,
Speaker 1: and I have to tell you, not only does that
Speaker 1: not make sense when you look at the great age
Speaker 1: of many of these buildings, but the oral traditions, the
Speaker 1: traditions that have been handed down revealed that the Maya
Speaker 1: congregated as a collective and this is a multi racial,
Speaker 1: multi ethnic group of people that gathered from all parts
Speaker 1: of the different all parts of the planet, Africa, Asia,
Speaker 1: Europe well pleasant day or Europe, Middle East, and whatever
Speaker 1: is in Southeast Asia. These are the people that gathered
Speaker 1: probably over twelve thousand or more years ago. The elders
Speaker 1: tell me it's about twenty to twenty eight thousand years
Speaker 1: as close to that as they can get. But I
Speaker 1: don't know. I mean, there's just no writing. And we
Speaker 1: do know of the thousands of codises that were once
Speaker 1: available a complete library. Only four books are left and
Speaker 1: that's all we got. And that leads me to today's show.
Speaker 1: Today's program is a discussion a decipherment of these codises
Speaker 1: and most notably the Brogaia Codex, which is in Europe,
Speaker 1: and how it actually describes machines and biology and calindrical
Speaker 1: data reading. This is why a lot of the Maya
Speaker 1: are considered daykeepers, because they're calindrical calendar masters, calendar scientists,
Speaker 1: and they can tell what time of the year to
Speaker 1: plant their crops. In fact, some of the more fine
Speaker 1: tune daykeepers were used and they would tell a newly
Speaker 1: married couple or a couple that wanted to have a child,
Speaker 1: what time of year, what day, if possible, to conceive
Speaker 1: a child, and what would what the child would turn
Speaker 1: out to be if they did it on this date
Speaker 1: as close as possible, what they could what they could
Speaker 1: predict that the child would would grow up to be,
Speaker 1: what their role in life would be. So these codises
Speaker 1: that we have left to us are brilliant, but the
Speaker 1: most important thing, and I don't remember if you if
Speaker 1: you guys, if you remember, about seven years ago, we
Speaker 1: had Jim o'caonhn who was a forensic engineer on he
Speaker 1: wrote a book on the Maya, and he was told
Speaker 1: about in the nineteen sixties when he was down there,
Speaker 1: that most of the codses, in fact all of them,
Speaker 1: all of the codises are translated from technical manuals, and
Speaker 1: these manuals were used for observing planets for crop development.
Speaker 1: They were the last vestiges of the brilliant ancestors of
Speaker 1: the Maya. This is going to be important look at
Speaker 1: what we can expect. And as we look at these
Speaker 1: courtisies a little better, we can begin to introduce artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence as it's tweaked in such a way, and this
Speaker 1: will also help us gain great leaps in terms of decipherment.
Speaker 1: And this is the big problem we have with Maya
Speaker 1: hieroglyssics decipherment. And this is the problem I have with
Speaker 1: the archaeological communities. They did not in the late nineteen
Speaker 1: fifties and sixties confer with the elders and with the
Speaker 1: daykeepers of the time. They decided to go alone. And
Speaker 1: these Western scientists were working at the best they can
Speaker 1: to decipher the hieroglyphics. But if you don't work with
Speaker 1: the people that are still alive, I mean what the
Speaker 1: hell what are you doing? So today we're gonna learn
Speaker 1: about a number of aspects of these courtises, why they
Speaker 1: are important, the scientific data behind these codises, and what
Speaker 1: we can learn by the sipherment. So today's program is
Speaker 1: a true prehistory. And my guest is Aloy's eyeling. Hey,
Speaker 1: the seventh annual Grand Egyptian Tour is coming up. We
Speaker 1: have Mohammad and Nohah, bring him with us. We're going
Speaker 1: to be visiting Tennis, Egypt, which is very very old.
Speaker 1: We don't know what happened there. It looks like a
Speaker 1: catastrophic event happened. It has megalithic structures, statues, and some
Speaker 1: large pieces strewed around Muhammad. What do we know about Tennis?
Speaker 1: What makes it so unique?
Speaker 3: What we know about Tennis unfortunately so little, but it
Speaker 3: is so little inconvenior with the importance and the greatness
Speaker 3: of Tennis. But for us it is very high level
Speaker 3: of information. Number one, what we know that Tennis was
Speaker 3: a great center of knowledge in ancient Egypt. It was
Speaker 3: the big city receiving all the travelers and immigrants and
Speaker 3: visitors to Egypt from the northeast part of Egypt. They
Speaker 3: come across Sinai. The second thing about Tennis that there
Speaker 3: was a massive size tembile or I can call it
Speaker 3: big town. We call it temble dedicated to Amonra. This
Speaker 3: tembile or this village, if I can call it, this
Speaker 3: way was completely built out of rose granite fromas one.
Speaker 3: You know what, people don't know that there was more
Speaker 3: than twelve obelisks in Tennis, maybe more, but the remains
Speaker 3: some of them still in good condition, but all of
Speaker 3: them are laying on the ground. The one they took
Speaker 3: it to the Grand Museum, the one in front of
Speaker 3: the main gate of the Grand Museum is from Tennis,
Speaker 3: and the one in Tarry Square now is from Tennis.
Speaker 3: So there are about ten obelisks or eight obelisks still
Speaker 3: there at Tennis. So the story is very strange because
Speaker 3: we expected even if the temple was in bad condition,
Speaker 3: we expected more ruins, to see more cat ORed blocks,
Speaker 3: but we found only few. But we found the biggest.
Speaker 3: By the way, there are remains of blocks weighing more
Speaker 3: than two hundred ton and three hundred ton we found
Speaker 3: the foot of a statue. According to the dimension of
Speaker 3: the foot, the statue would be more than fifteen hundred ton.
Speaker 3: The foot is like a car size.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 3: Okay, so we don't know what happened exactly. It must
Speaker 3: be something very strong hit tennis and hit that temple
Speaker 3: and it causes it caused great damage, like great exublusion
Speaker 3: happened inside the temple and caused that all the pieces
Speaker 3: are scattered on a distance maybe like three or four
Speaker 3: kilometers wide.
Speaker 1: Amazing.
Speaker 3: When people go to tennis, they're going to feel the
Speaker 3: magic and they feel the dips of the history of tennis.
Speaker 1: I join us. It's going to be April twenty eight
Speaker 1: through May tenth. For all the details and the itinerary,
Speaker 1: go to Earth Agents dot com Forward Slash Tours. We
Speaker 1: have a returning guest this week. He has written a
Speaker 1: number of articles in the Graham Hancock website. His name
Speaker 1: is Elloye's Ealing and he is a German. He's actually retired.
Speaker 1: He's a former chemical researcher. But he's written extensively about
Speaker 1: prehistory and he has a new book out called The
Speaker 1: True Er Prehistory, The True or Prehistory, An Unofficial History
Speaker 1: of Human Man and Earth. It's volume one. And what
Speaker 1: is unique about this book is that he is very
Speaker 1: much focused on prehistory and our missing prehistory. In other words,
Speaker 1: we have a lot of guesses on what has taken place,
Speaker 1: but as a researcher, like many of us, we filled
Speaker 1: there's a huge void in our understanding of the of
Speaker 1: the past. So we're gonna learn a little bit about
Speaker 1: this new book, the Truer Prehistory in our interview today.
Speaker 1: So hey, elloy, welcome back to Earth. Anxient is great
Speaker 1: to have you, okayver, Yeah, what influenced you to write
Speaker 1: this book? Was it a combination of the articles that
Speaker 1: you had written, or was there something that you discovered
Speaker 1: that you felt needed to be presented in a book.
Speaker 4: Okay, maybe just for introduction to But then I retired,
Speaker 4: I decided to go into the prehistory and to get
Speaker 4: a better understanding of what was the real ire the
Speaker 4: past of man. And I checked various sources, and one
Speaker 4: of the sources, by chance, these codexes in Mexico from
Speaker 4: the attack time before the Spanish coced the country, and
Speaker 4: it really struck me like like lightning when I when
Speaker 4: I suddenly realized, hey, this is something which is biochemistry.
Speaker 4: It's it's not some fancy mouse or some fancy uh
Speaker 4: pictures of quality or some nonsense. This is really not
Speaker 4: an really science. And so I started to dig deeper
Speaker 4: and deeper deeper, and in fact I attended even for
Speaker 4: two years lectures in biochemistry as to local university, just
Speaker 4: to get a better understanding of what was was inside.
Speaker 4: And as I proceeded, I really realized this is is
Speaker 4: not superficial, it's really in depth scientific. What is shown there. Obviously,
Speaker 4: the the pictures, they are not according to our way
Speaker 4: to formulate chemistry. So they do not write merelylecules or
Speaker 4: some form. They do it in a way which is
Speaker 4: more I think, adapted to their culture. And one has
Speaker 4: to do, I think, to recognize that the original books
Speaker 4: are lost, they're gun for a long time, so what
Speaker 4: be looking at are copies, copies of something from long
Speaker 4: gone gun times. And these copies they were adjusted to
Speaker 4: what the people in their daily life, daily life experience,
Speaker 4: and so one has to look behind the curtain sometimes.
Speaker 4: But if you do so, then you really get struck
Speaker 4: what is in there. So it's not let's a simple chemistry,
Speaker 4: it is it is something for example, which was in
Speaker 4: in recently in twenty two, a Nobel price was given
Speaker 4: to the person who who invented this kind of of
Speaker 4: modification of DNA, and this is something nobody can imagine.
Speaker 1: Are you talking about Crisper.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Chrisper, exactly, Chrisper. And this is an idea to
Speaker 4: really to tune DNA. What maybe just to explain if
Speaker 4: you if you want to tune DNA, one has to
Speaker 4: imagine that the length of this DNI and DNA strand
Speaker 4: is about two meters two meters, and if you blow
Speaker 4: up the sickness to the sickness of an hair, the
Speaker 4: length of that strand increases to one hundred miles almost
Speaker 4: And to tune pinpointing the exact position, you have to
Speaker 4: do it by the inch, So that means you have
Speaker 4: to address a position on the strength of one hundred
Speaker 4: miles to an inch accuracy. And this is unbelievable how
Speaker 4: they do it and how they learn to do it.
Speaker 4: And one of these techniques techniques is Crisper Cuss. And
Speaker 4: you find an exact replication of Crisper Cuss also in
Speaker 4: the codexes in the in the in one picture of
Speaker 4: the codex Borgia, you have exactly a mimicry of this
Speaker 4: modern presentation to an engine representation. And in these cases
Speaker 4: you can even look at the strand and how it's
Speaker 4: it's attached to the substrate and things like that, so
Speaker 4: it's it's maybe not obvious, but if you understand what
Speaker 4: is shown, then it became obvious. And I have also
Speaker 4: you are to stress that the pictures are not isolated.
Speaker 4: So there's picture here, pictures there, and fragments and you
Speaker 4: have to sort it and put it together a book.
Speaker 4: So you find everything in it. Molecuts, you find DNA,
Speaker 4: you find aeron a, you find how to do a
Speaker 4: modification of DNA. You have all these deep in depths
Speaker 4: in promation in these various pictures. So it's a book
Speaker 4: of genetics, it's not. And codecs of some mad guys,
Speaker 4: which I think this is really pity the Spanish at
Speaker 4: that time that didn't know what they had in hand,
Speaker 4: so they burned maybe ninety nine percent of what they found,
Speaker 4: and only a very little of the book survives. And
Speaker 4: this one was by chance the batary of the Vatican
Speaker 4: in Rome, and there it was stored on a very good,
Speaker 4: nice conditions and it survived. And so we can have
Speaker 4: this for an example what was known to our interests.
Speaker 1: Want to I want to talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: the these codises, because I have studied the Dresden codis
Speaker 1: a little bit. But the one you're talking about, the
Speaker 1: Borgaia code.
Speaker 4: Example, okay in German d SA Borgia, I do not know.
Speaker 1: Huh. Years ago I interviewed an engineer who had spoken
Speaker 1: to an elder in Yucatan, Mexico, and this elder Maya,
Speaker 1: said that they had these coduses had been reproduced from
Speaker 1: technical manuals, and this is exactly what you believe. But
Speaker 1: the problem is that in the interpretation sometimes it doesn't
Speaker 1: make a lot of sense because they didn't understand what
Speaker 1: they were writing down. But if we go back to
Speaker 1: the beginning, how old do you think these Mesoamerican cultures are?
Speaker 1: Are they are they are these books in their libraries
Speaker 1: or are they Are they being handed down by their
Speaker 1: earlier generations?
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a generation task, so I think it's it's
Speaker 4: thousands of years ago. But it was that important for
Speaker 4: these people that they continued to copy, copy and copy,
Speaker 4: and this copying was done in a very accurate manner.
Speaker 4: They did not lose the content. Maybe they changed a
Speaker 4: bit the kind how they drew, the different glues and
Speaker 4: the different equipment and machines, but basically they kept the
Speaker 4: content and they caught at Bodia itself. It dates from
Speaker 4: the beginning of the sixteenth fifteenth century, so it's fairly new,
Speaker 4: but it's just a copy, and I think it was
Speaker 4: it was a tough poof for the priests, so they
Speaker 4: did it to the best of their capabilities to keep
Speaker 4: all the signs and all the information accurate and not
Speaker 4: to miss any any dot or something like that. And
Speaker 4: if you go into it, you really find, for example,
Speaker 4: the number of amino acids you which are in human
Speaker 4: life or in early in the earthly life anyway, twenty
Speaker 4: two amino acids are involved in billing you and me
Speaker 4: and everybody's and everything on earth. And exactly you find
Speaker 4: twenty two gloves in this codex Botia, not twenty not
Speaker 4: twenty five, twenty two. And then the other stop board
Speaker 4: is if you look at cups or at some some
Speaker 4: machinery and equipment, then they always find signs. In four
Speaker 4: they knew about the setup of the DNA. You have
Speaker 4: four different molecules so called nuclear teeds, which build the DNA,
Speaker 4: and they, as we also do it. They just use
Speaker 4: different colors to present each of it. And so you
Speaker 4: can really sometimes just replicate easily what it's thrown there
Speaker 4: and what it's shown today. And I'm fairly sure they
Speaker 4: were more advanced than we are. So what is the
Speaker 4: state of the art in DNI DNA biochemistry is to
Speaker 4: build artificial DNA. This is maybe the top of the
Speaker 4: of the art for the moment. And you find machines
Speaker 4: in these core exportia for example, but also in cordext
Speaker 4: Cavaticanos pulosen survived, which really have one hundred percent fit
Speaker 4: to what we do today. So you have the same
Speaker 4: set up, you you have the same piping, the same flasks.
Speaker 4: It's unbelievable how similar it is. But this is not
Speaker 4: that surprising because if you if you're restricted to do something,
Speaker 4: then the physical and chemical necessities they force you to
Speaker 4: do it in the same way. And therefore the similarity
Speaker 4: is for me another proof that my interpretation is a
Speaker 4: correct one. Right, so and and okay, and it's unbelievable.
Speaker 4: I only can can suggest and advise you take a
Speaker 4: deeper look and understand, and that in the book I
Speaker 4: always try to do it. I show the morons doing
Speaker 4: the modern waded out of then it and the Mexican way,
Speaker 4: how they did do it. And then if you have
Speaker 4: this one to one comparson, you easily understand this is
Speaker 4: not by chance. This is in depth knowledge for what issues.
Speaker 1: So were they genetically and I couldn't believe in the beginning.
Speaker 4: I was struck.
Speaker 1: Were they genetically enhancing Homo sapien? Or are you suggesting
Speaker 1: in the interpretation of the Borgaea codecs that they are
Speaker 1: showing how humans were created?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think this is maybe a little far fetching.
Speaker 4: I cannot say that it was really creating men. There
Speaker 4: are few drawings. They'll see that a child is coming
Speaker 4: out of a box or things like that, or they okay,
Speaker 4: this might somehow replicate the Yeah, the syentess of creation
Speaker 4: of men. But the basic is that you find the
Speaker 4: biochemistry which is mandatory to do this. So maybe they created.
Speaker 4: But here it goes one step deeper and further it
Speaker 4: says how they did do it? Not like in in
Speaker 4: Suma or in in Mesopotamia, you have these news from
Speaker 4: some gods who did some work to produce artificial Are
Speaker 4: servants of slaves to ah to to do the the
Speaker 4: for for for their daily life? Yeah, it's it's more
Speaker 4: the scientific explication. How there else knowledge existed which allowed
Speaker 4: them to do this. There is no spelling. The whole
Speaker 4: Code Act is not a single line of a number
Speaker 4: of any writing, nothing. It's only pictures. And so you
Speaker 4: never can say okay, and there was a drawing and
Speaker 4: say okay, yeah, we do this or that and this
Speaker 4: make this or that. But this is missing. It's just
Speaker 4: a selection of drawings and of logic set up, how
Speaker 4: to produce DNA, how to combine it, how to modify it.
Speaker 4: Everything is found in a little different way, but still visible.
Speaker 4: How they understood it, and this is magic, This is
Speaker 4: really magic how they did do it. And they were
Speaker 4: advanced in compared it to us. Obviously they had synthesizing
Speaker 4: machines which did automatically what today is done in the
Speaker 4: tedious work in laboratories, so they were really at more advance.
Speaker 4: And I have to admit I cannot understand all the drawings.
Speaker 4: Maybe I understand ninety percent, but ten percent I do
Speaker 4: not understand. And this is maybe because also we do
Speaker 4: not know yet what's say I do ex there, so
Speaker 4: that we that we are behind it. We can only
Speaker 4: understand what we know ourself, but we cannot interpret something
Speaker 4: which is out of the school for the moment.
Speaker 1: We're gonna take a short commercial break to allow our
Speaker 1: sponsors to identify themselves, and we will return shortly with
Speaker 1: my guest today, Alloys Eileen, coming to us from Germany
Speaker 1: and discussing his latest book, A True Prehistory. Will be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 5: Hey, stick to the code with the coast of my
Speaker 5: pros and don't play about her.
Speaker 3: Rum's on the switch of the floe, sell on No.
Speaker 5: We can give exits notion in love with the kid,
Speaker 5: doman his god us packet for calling and bring me
Speaker 5: no clothes. That's it. I'm coping of fill up the
Speaker 5: rit meta hip from the netta. You know it's the
Speaker 5: twitch quick quick, so I know it's the g After
Speaker 5: we to meet up with the friends, they're like, what
Speaker 5: happened you blowing and cracking nick game? But the coach
Speaker 5: and the glitch. Yeah, I was outside so long, got
Speaker 5: frost by. I ain't never stopped, no way, got foresight.
Speaker 5: I'll be on tour, my bros. No tour guy pet
Speaker 5: the floor and the dog get oh my soon as
Speaker 5: they called my hey, yeah, she said, I look like
Speaker 5: oh gez. But this ain't shortline, Moatop said, I'm at
Speaker 5: the art and get them.
Speaker 1: My guess today is alloy ealing. He has written a
Speaker 1: new book called The True Prehistory. This is a look
Speaker 1: at the various courtises that are left to us by
Speaker 1: various cultures, most notably the Maya and the Aztec in
Speaker 1: meso America. Are there any other codices in any part
Speaker 1: of the world that are similar to the meso American books?
Speaker 4: No? No, maybe there there are these tablets of summer
Speaker 4: that they will find. Uh yeah. Also also the the epics,
Speaker 4: in addition that.
Speaker 1: The epic Yoga.
Speaker 4: M hm, the epicsh yeah, no, not gevis It's it's
Speaker 4: older it books. You know, arahass is one name and
Speaker 4: the other isn't super upper gosted title. But there was
Speaker 4: this goddess Ninhu Sangha and she would created man by
Speaker 4: whatever means. And interesting is that this child has a
Speaker 4: very tiny piece of hair on its head and the
Speaker 4: same child is shown in the codex makes a similarity,
Speaker 4: which is again astonishing. Looks like that the information was global,
Speaker 4: that there was not only in Mexican. They took the
Speaker 4: best records. They continued to to have an unbroken history.
Speaker 4: In this drawing in Mesopotamia, there are just fragments or
Speaker 4: in the Bible, there are fragments left of what was done.
Speaker 4: It's it's it's it's almost said, compared to thoughts that
Speaker 4: what the codex is show, But the codexes they are
Speaker 4: struck of luck. I could not believed that something took
Speaker 4: records from millennia and just kept everything in such a
Speaker 4: preceis precise way, and we have to be it's obviously
Speaker 4: they did not do get biochemistry. No Maya person or
Speaker 4: somebody else had an idea about biochemistry. This was just
Speaker 4: for them and cultural heredy. They heredy they want to keep.
Speaker 1: So you're saying that these books, these courtses are just
Speaker 1: the native's history and that the Maya did not use
Speaker 1: genetic engineering.
Speaker 4: No not, I don't think so. So they were just
Speaker 4: people who did took the records, who had said something
Speaker 4: you herod inherently inherited from formal people or from former civilis.
Speaker 4: They maybe from aliens. This is not possible to desire
Speaker 4: how they got these information. They just kept it. They
Speaker 4: did not have the machine and the equipment. One has
Speaker 4: to recognize at that time the Maya that they lived
Speaker 4: almost in Stone Age civilization, so there was a little
Speaker 4: copper of use. But mist was made by wood or
Speaker 4: by stone, And if you look at the complexity of
Speaker 4: the equipment and the machinery shown in these codexes, it's
Speaker 4: absolutely impossible to produce something like that by use of
Speaker 4: wood or by use of stone. They'll find, for example,
Speaker 4: scales which looked like a micromat's crew. This makes sense
Speaker 4: if you want to do biochemistry and need to portion
Speaker 4: or to add the right component at the right place
Speaker 4: in the right moment, but you cannot do it in
Speaker 4: a in a laboratory of stock in casement. Impossible, impossible.
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you and get your opinion
Speaker 1: about another area that you talk about, which is UH
Speaker 1: calindrical studies, but also planet movements. There's a great deal
Speaker 1: of detail on the Moon and the Venus, uh orbits
Speaker 1: and movements. It seems like somebody was actually in a
Speaker 1: craft because they have such accurate readings of the calendar
Speaker 1: or the movements of Venus and Mar and the Moon.
Speaker 1: How would they know some such great detail about the
Speaker 1: the movements of those planets.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so this this is another miracle. And in that case,
Speaker 4: there are other records from India, from ancient India which
Speaker 4: is similar in quality. I'm but this is a personal theory.
Speaker 4: I do not know if it's true, but I think
Speaker 4: that our planetary system had a high civilization on Venus,
Speaker 4: and Venus in a cosmic disaster got struck by a
Speaker 4: moon like moon sized microplanet planet, a small planet, and
Speaker 4: it transformed the planet and wiped out every life on
Speaker 4: this planet and the people from all the inhabitants from Venus,
Speaker 4: they came to Earth and they were the bringer of culture,
Speaker 4: the bringer of technology, and they commanded biochemistry and other
Speaker 4: things that did also space traveling and things like that.
Speaker 4: So wea just ah the aftermaths of a long gun
Speaker 4: civilization in this planetary system. So this makes explains also
Speaker 4: why Venus has such a high importance in Maya culture.
Speaker 4: So they their calendar is not only based on the
Speaker 4: Sun and the Moon, is also based on Venus. And
Speaker 4: to me, the best explanation is that the the inhabitant
Speaker 4: of Venus who's succeeded to save their life on Earth,
Speaker 4: that they kept their memory of their gun time also
Speaker 4: so that Venus became for them something like like a
Speaker 4: memory of a of a gun area.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 4: But I do I don't like that the idea that
Speaker 4: the planetary system was messed up in total. So this
Speaker 4: is This is also one of the problems. A lot
Speaker 4: of people talking about astronomy and and hip prehistory have
Speaker 4: little knowledge in in astronomy and in physics, and so
Speaker 4: they come up with his funny ideas and they're they're, yeah,
Speaker 4: I'm a physicist by education, and I worked in a
Speaker 4: chem company and then I'd attended lectures in chemistry, so
Speaker 4: I know a bit about what is possible and what
Speaker 4: is not possible. And everything I write in my books
Speaker 4: I propose is on solid based physics or solid based chemistry.
Speaker 4: Is nothing invented or funny singing or some crazy ideas.
Speaker 4: Everything is based on what we know or today and
Speaker 4: keep for sure. And this I think it's also a
Speaker 4: difference to a lot of other people. They just make
Speaker 4: guesses what could be have been in the past, and
Speaker 4: how to explain this or that tablet or this or
Speaker 4: that epics, but they cannot onto the basics. For example,
Speaker 4: Willy Kovskiel, I think you know him and other people
Speaker 4: strange ideas about Yeah, sorry, but but he he was
Speaker 4: not an expert, so he was he was just fancy
Speaker 4: guy who had nonsense ideas. And this is something I
Speaker 4: don't like. Even if you do alternative prehistory, alternative science
Speaker 4: or fringe science or whatever you would call it, you
Speaker 4: need to stick to what is known. You need to
Speaker 4: stick to mathematics. You need to still stick to physics.
Speaker 4: You need to know the possibilities of chemistry. You cannot
Speaker 4: invent something which is out of nature. It has to
Speaker 4: everything has to be normal. And the proposal I mag
Speaker 4: they are normal in principle it could have been in
Speaker 4: this way without to turn to hyperspace or something other
Speaker 4: ideas nobody knows is they exist. That all everything is
Speaker 4: explicable in the framework of our scientific knowledge. And this
Speaker 4: is an important point for me, that we keep stick
Speaker 4: to what is possible and not come up with crazy ideas.
Speaker 4: Then you can explain everything, but you cannot prove it.
Speaker 4: And I think this is also important. But I did
Speaker 4: do when I interpreted the cod it is I tried
Speaker 4: to prove what was in I'd don't just make some
Speaker 4: funny comments to say, Okay, yere DNA there this or that. No,
Speaker 4: I try to complete a ceasis and to prove it,
Speaker 4: and I think I succeeded in doing so. Maybe others
Speaker 4: have a different opinion. Official scientists about this matter. Maybe
Speaker 4: you know as well. Usually they don't like the idea,
Speaker 4: so they they feel unhippy to discuss these topics.
Speaker 1: You can't talk about ancient prehistory with any more clarity
Speaker 1: than cave people with modern sciences, they just they can't.
Speaker 1: Their education blocks their thinking. And I have this issue
Speaker 1: with archaeologist you. You can't talk about prehistory to them
Speaker 1: with any level of sophistication because they.
Speaker 4: Just they just it's a pity. But this is the truth. Yeah,
Speaker 4: and it's dessinally in the US. I think you should
Speaker 4: know better. All this Clovis theory about the settlement of
Speaker 4: the America, it's it's complete nonsense. And this is it's
Speaker 4: not proven that America was settled already fifty seventy thousand
Speaker 4: years ago by humans, and so they stick. But even
Speaker 4: in these days you find then you professors will stick
Speaker 4: to this nonsense because they want to believe in it.
Speaker 4: They do not accept what is nowadays proven from excavations
Speaker 4: but also from from from real from real proof that
Speaker 4: they don't like. They stick to the old fashioned way.
Speaker 4: And unfortunately this is not only in Archielotry. I tried
Speaker 4: to discuss the matter of these coolities with a German
Speaker 4: professor of biochemistry, and okay, he said, very nice, very
Speaker 4: interesting correspondences, very interesting, but I do not believe.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's tough. Talk a little bit about the time period,
Speaker 1: if you would, alone, of the Venetian civilization and following
Speaker 1: the destruction, how they populated Earth.
Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, I think that there is as a sequence
Speaker 4: of events. To my understanding, the first event was that
Speaker 4: a minor sound, a small sun that it crossed pass
Speaker 4: through the through our planetary system. And this was about
Speaker 4: forty thousand years ago. And again there are good reasons
Speaker 4: why I believe in this. It's not just nons just idea.
Speaker 4: It's it's again, it's also in the records and in
Speaker 4: the fossils you can you can find evidence for this.
Speaker 4: And the second great event was that the Earth captured
Speaker 4: the Moon. I think this is what we discussed last
Speaker 4: time in our interview. This was about twelve thousand, thirteen
Speaker 4: thousand years ago, maybe fifteen thousand years ago, but that
Speaker 4: it was what Platon called the Atlantis story. And then
Speaker 4: there is an event which is really outstanding also in
Speaker 4: the records of the ancient civilizations, and this is the
Speaker 4: lighting up of Venus three thousand, four hundred or three thousand,
Speaker 4: five hundred forty four, I don't know the except year,
Speaker 4: but it doesn't matter. About two thousand, five hundred BC,
Speaker 4: Venus flashed up. Nobody knows why, but I think this
Speaker 4: was the moment when this giant asteroid or minor planet
Speaker 4: smashed into Venus and just transformed it into its today's status.
Speaker 4: And at that time a few of the Venus inhabitants
Speaker 4: lived on Earth or had did did space travel or
Speaker 4: things like that. So they escaped the unnuhilation of Venus.
Speaker 4: And this was three thousand, four hundred and this fit's
Speaker 4: also this the the records of the first civilizations on Earth.
Speaker 4: Maybe they knew about this upcoming event and try to
Speaker 4: escape Earth, which was the the only their planet they
Speaker 4: could they could come go too. And if you look
Speaker 4: at at some statutes and in Zuma or also in
Speaker 4: other areas, so reptile you eat like yeah, I don't know, beings,
Speaker 4: I don't know if maybe and they have these slid eyes,
Speaker 4: they have this flat head, they have the the big
Speaker 4: big and flat hat and say they look some are
Speaker 4: like like like a reptively eat being and to be
Speaker 4: it's probably that the Venus people looked like these these figurines,
Speaker 4: or had that the periods of these figurines, because again,
Speaker 4: these figurines, they are too abundant on Earth in two
Speaker 4: various places. You find them at the same time about
Speaker 4: four thousand to three thousand BC in Siberia in East Siberia.
Speaker 4: You find them in Mesopotamia, and you find them in Europe.
Speaker 4: And this is for classical a relogy, impossible that there
Speaker 4: was an exchange of information between these areas. And they
Speaker 4: look too much alike. Everybody the same appearance of these.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're going to take a short commercial break to
Speaker 1: allow our sponsors to identify themselves, and we will return
Speaker 1: shortly with my guests today always Eileen discussing his new book,
Speaker 1: The True Prehistory, will be right back. Images from doctor
Speaker 1: Ealing's book The True Prehistory will be available on the
Speaker 1: Facebook page Go to Earth Ancients, Go to Facebook. We'll
Speaker 1: also have a few of the photos on Instagram. And
Speaker 1: you got to look closely at the representations of the
Speaker 1: various technologies as the Mesoamerican Shaman reproduce them on these tablets.
Speaker 1: These coatises quite quite startling and very very unique. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they look like reptiles. You you actually have live in
Speaker 1: their book. You have a statue of Pristina from Courcy
Speaker 1: of which is dated of four thousand BC.
Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly, the sameta, and you find them also in Sibirriga.
Speaker 4: And so this again is a global occurrence of something
Speaker 4: which is classically not extra cable. So I think the
Speaker 4: my my idea to have I've written a book about
Speaker 4: tour history as some background. I don't say that I
Speaker 4: know what the true history is, but I think what
Speaker 4: I propose is at least as well founded as that
Speaker 4: what today is told us by official accareotriggy of historical
Speaker 4: You know these these megal lid structures and and all
Speaker 4: these stuff. It's it's again not explicable how these people
Speaker 4: were able to lift and to transport stones of one
Speaker 4: thousand tom's weight. There is something what is missing in
Speaker 4: the explanation. And just to not to discuss it or
Speaker 4: just to say it's of not interesting, I think this
Speaker 4: is this is really non scientific behavior. You have to
Speaker 4: try to find the answer and not to to avoid
Speaker 4: any any discus or any close or look at these problems.
Speaker 1: Are you suggesting that the Venetians were the ones who
Speaker 1: created the Homo sapien sapien or do you think it
Speaker 1: was another E. T race?
Speaker 4: No, I think the better reptilid. It makes it makes
Speaker 4: more sense. And these people that they did a lot
Speaker 4: they let's say that they refined some savage Homo species
Speaker 4: to create Homo sapiens us, or just for example. Another
Speaker 4: unbelievable situation is if you look at the languages of
Speaker 4: the world, you can date them back and say, okay,
Speaker 4: at that at that time they were common, so they've
Speaker 4: broke away from each other. And you can determine by
Speaker 4: going to the back when this happened, and all this
Speaker 4: ends up about forty thousand BC. That means it looks
Speaker 4: like like that forty thousand BC, there was a language
Speaker 4: everybody on Earth was speaking. All all men had the
Speaker 4: same language. This is unbelievable because at that time they
Speaker 4: were spread all around the world. Why one language for
Speaker 4: everyone on the world. The only expectation is aliens came
Speaker 4: in and gave language to men. Man was not capable
Speaker 4: to speak before. And this is also genetically interesting because
Speaker 4: there is a specific gene this makes us able to speak.
Speaker 4: If you miss this gene, and there are some people
Speaker 4: who miss it, they cannot speak. It's not because they
Speaker 4: don't want it, just because they miss the gene who
Speaker 4: takes care about speaking and to meet this also the
Speaker 4: explication by apes. An ape is not capable to speak,
Speaker 4: he can learn, he is smart to a certain degree.
Speaker 4: There was even an example that an ape was able
Speaker 4: to drive the car or things like that, but never
Speaker 4: an ape learned to speak. And because he didn't, because
Speaker 4: he is missing this gene. And fc aliens came in
Speaker 4: and just created this gene or introduced this gene in
Speaker 4: the human gene. Men started speaking. And that is one
Speaker 4: puzzle piece in a big puzzle. But all these puzzle pieces, say,
Speaker 4: fit together, and it makes human. The creation the creature
Speaker 4: of aliens, and I think forty thousand PC is a
Speaker 4: good number. Then there was little exchange. So they settled
Speaker 4: on earth. Also the Venetians they and but also they
Speaker 4: they use these almost spacious for just to to grow
Speaker 4: crop for example, cereals or crop. They there were lazy guys.
Speaker 4: I think this is something one is recognized. And so
Speaker 4: they they had a lower case and they mutilated. They
Speaker 4: didn't like to work all day, and so they're they
Speaker 4: created men. And why why do I believe in this
Speaker 4: This is because the wild form of these cereals, they
Speaker 4: are not existing in the areas where they perst grown
Speaker 4: as a commercial cereal. They are from Himalaya, from southern Africa,
Speaker 4: and all of a sudden they become high yield crop
Speaker 4: and high yield cereal in Mesopotamia. Unbelievable. How could this happen.
Speaker 4: The The idea is some alien brought it from these places,
Speaker 4: did some genetic engineering on it and making them high
Speaker 4: yield crop. And again this fits. They they needed food,
Speaker 4: specific food because they metabolism was different from ours, Venus
Speaker 4: is different from both different from Earth. So they they
Speaker 4: they produced their food according according to their need and
Speaker 4: nan was just just a nice add on. So they
Speaker 4: did not do it because they liked us that much
Speaker 4: and want to do something good to the to the
Speaker 4: earthly beings. It was it was sheer need they was
Speaker 4: to do that. And this also explains why they didn't
Speaker 4: show any respect to the humans. If you look at
Speaker 4: the old epics, you find that the the gods they
Speaker 4: behaved very rude and very strict to men. Death was
Speaker 4: a common experience, so they if if somebody was not
Speaker 4: obedient enough, he got killed, no problem. They had no
Speaker 4: real relations. They had maybe to us the same relation
Speaker 4: as we have to our chicken, something like that. So
Speaker 4: if somebody died or the somebody was killed, that didn't matter.
Speaker 4: It was just theyse because it took twenty years to
Speaker 4: grow another one in exchange. But this was the worst
Speaker 4: of what they could see as problem.
Speaker 1: Can you tell us a little bit about what looks
Speaker 1: like experiments, because in your book you describe these long
Speaker 1: headed humans that you know, and you give some example
Speaker 1: the achinotin as one and others. Were they actual et hybrids?
Speaker 1: Are actual or genetic experiments? Yeah?
Speaker 4: Maybe both. I think if if if you look at
Speaker 4: the at the literature, you offend. So this is maybe
Speaker 4: the black hairs or they were black from the experils.
Speaker 4: I do not know. So they were the blacks. And
Speaker 4: obviously the gods had a h need of a hierarchy
Speaker 4: also in their slave system, so they want somebody to
Speaker 4: rule the other. So the common laborer was lower cased
Speaker 4: and then the net that need somebody in between who
Speaker 4: just directed and controlled the workers for them. And I
Speaker 4: think these long headed h paros and and and and chiefs,
Speaker 4: they were the They were bridging the gap between the
Speaker 4: lower cased people and the gods. So also in the
Speaker 4: Bible you can read that the God she had action
Speaker 4: arrange with some of the selected people. So with with Adam,
Speaker 4: even with Abrahm and others, they they had direct relations.
Speaker 4: They talked to each other. There was not something like today,
Speaker 4: I never met a god. Maybe I did not even
Speaker 4: meet an angel. I think it's the same rules for you.
Speaker 4: But but in former times the relation was close. So
Speaker 4: they didn't like it asra, but they needed it ultra
Speaker 4: each other and the God had the God said the
Speaker 4: long headed persons. This makes the sense, well, it makes
Speaker 4: them easily different common people as the as the beliefs
Speaker 4: or something. Work was done properly and that everybody was
Speaker 4: obedient and that they worked hard and things like that.
Speaker 4: So this also makes expelicable. Why why a normal thinking
Speaker 4: being should decide to to grow crop. It's it's a
Speaker 4: it's a disaster if you if you just live from
Speaker 4: your environment, you have worked for three to four hours
Speaker 4: a day. But if you start to become a farmer,
Speaker 4: all of a sudden, you work ten hours a day
Speaker 4: and and ninety of the time you are not direct
Speaker 4: access to the food. You you just start to grow it.
Speaker 4: You have to sew it, you have to to produce
Speaker 4: the corn, you have to mill it, and all this stuff.
Speaker 4: It's it's it's a disaster. No clear minded man would
Speaker 4: do so by free will. And if you if you
Speaker 4: look in the in the indigenous people in Norgenia or
Speaker 4: in Africa or whatever, nobody has the idea to start
Speaker 4: growing crops. This is something which needs external advice, somebody
Speaker 4: who says you have to do so, then maybe they start,
Speaker 4: but out of themselves. I do not see why. Okay,
Speaker 4: but this is a very big, fragmented discussion. But you see,
Speaker 4: I really try to dig deeper and to get them
Speaker 4: a really conclusive picture. Not to have an idea. Here
Speaker 4: is a big stone, and there is some funny muse
Speaker 4: or things like that. But my idea is really to
Speaker 4: come up with something consistent. Maybe this makes me unique,
Speaker 4: maybe crazy, I do not know, but at least I try.
Speaker 4: No I was.
Speaker 1: I was fascinated by your look at these courtices and
Speaker 1: reconstructing what you think is the machines of genome splicing
Speaker 1: and so forth and so on. We're going to take
Speaker 1: a short commercial break to allow our sponsors to identify
Speaker 1: themselves and we'll return shortly with my guests today Alloy's
Speaker 1: Ailing discussing his latest book, The True Prehistory, will be
Speaker 1: right back with you. My guess today is Alloys Evening.
Speaker 1: He has written a new book called The True Prehistory,
Speaker 1: and it includes documents, in fact, interpretations of codises that
Speaker 1: show machinery, machines that are for biological change, for genetic
Speaker 1: genome splicing and other technologies. Now, one of the things
Speaker 1: I thought was also interesting is you talk about the
Speaker 1: Poopa Vu, which is the Sacred Maya book, and in
Speaker 1: it you claim there's a story of the creation of man.
Speaker 1: Talk about that because I I don't remember that part,
Speaker 1: but maybe I'm just not reading it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but this is this is a very simple story.
Speaker 4: It's it's similar to the Bible. Well, this is nothing
Speaker 4: about biochemistry or things like that. This is uh a
Speaker 4: fairy tale, I would say. So this is the deep
Speaker 4: they they got, said the creating men, out of using
Speaker 4: wood and clay and so and say. They had different
Speaker 4: failures and they started in you. So this this is
Speaker 4: something which is maybe more a fairy tale invented later
Speaker 4: on sus h as in neither Apodamia or in the Bible.
Speaker 4: This is this is not which you have to take
Speaker 4: two series. It's maybe just a faint remnants of of
Speaker 4: of something which was known but which was losing and
Speaker 4: concreteness as time passed by, so you can look at
Speaker 4: it at some things are interesting. For example, there's also
Speaker 4: interesting that some gods are descending from heaven by using
Speaker 4: robes or things like that makes sense. Again, if you
Speaker 4: do space travel, you have somehow to have something like
Speaker 4: a space elevator, otherwise you would't work, so you have
Speaker 4: to an orbitor and then you have have some elevator
Speaker 4: to go up and down to move heavy loads and
Speaker 4: to have really exchange of goods and so honoreds of force.
Speaker 4: And this is something which for me is also a
Speaker 4: nice historic event they kept record of.
Speaker 1: Amazing. The book's called the True Prehistory and Unofficial History
Speaker 1: of Heaven, Man and Earth. And my guest today has
Speaker 1: been Alloy Eiling. What is what is your thinking? Because
Speaker 1: this is book one or volume one, do you have
Speaker 1: more that you're uncovering?
Speaker 4: Can you please repeat you You've were blocked for a moments,
Speaker 4: so I.
Speaker 1: Was just wondering, this is book or volume one, do
Speaker 1: you have new volumes of other prehistory discoveries that you've made.
Speaker 4: Yeah, In total, the plan is to have four books,
Speaker 4: four books in total. I'm more or less finished this,
Speaker 4: but jacks them out for it takes the time. But
Speaker 4: so we have in total four books, and in total
Speaker 4: it's about one thousand and two hundred pages. And these
Speaker 4: are written and they are also published in German. So
Speaker 4: if you like, you can read the book in German.
Speaker 4: But okay, yeah, yeah, donnik, maybe you're you're interested in
Speaker 4: German or.
Speaker 1: I have ancestry there and relatives, but I don't speak
Speaker 1: the language anymore.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, for all Americans do they only have English
Speaker 4: as the native language. Okay, so yeah, So the other
Speaker 4: one is the next one is going to discuss the
Speaker 4: topic of this minor sun which passes through the planetary
Speaker 4: system and just causes some distortion and causes some havuk
Speaker 4: to the planetary organ of it. So this is the
Speaker 4: next one, and then a third one is going to
Speaker 4: discuss the Venetians and the fate of Venus and how
Speaker 4: everything happened with this planet and how space travel came
Speaker 4: about and what was in and what was good for it.
Speaker 4: And the fourth volume is about the Moon capture. This
Speaker 4: is the other highlight in my alternative history or prehistory,
Speaker 4: that the moon is a fairly young companion of Earth.
Speaker 4: It's only thirteen thousand years old. And this explains again
Speaker 4: a lot X explains for also, for example, why America
Speaker 4: was all of a sudden free from man and free
Speaker 4: from large animals. I don't know if you ever checked
Speaker 4: the history of the Americans, but it's funny. All the
Speaker 4: big stiles animals in South America, they are gone, all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, they are gone. And then in the
Speaker 4: in the end, and in the there are mud flows
Speaker 4: and stick like that. The old continent looks like inclined.
Speaker 4: In the west, it was elevated. In the east it
Speaker 4: was lowered. And this inclination you even can today see
Speaker 4: it if you if you look at the geological map.
Speaker 4: And and so the moon capture is the second highlight
Speaker 4: in my in my alternative history, and all this, Yeah,
Speaker 4: then that this makes the final comment that I say, okay,
Speaker 4: and this is what man is today. We have a moon,
Speaker 4: and it was a hard time. And in particularly I
Speaker 4: think it's important to know how how many risks exist
Speaker 4: in our in our lives, so we do not need
Speaker 4: atomic bombs. Yeah, the sustain universe itself is a very
Speaker 4: dangerous place.
Speaker 1: M hmm.
Speaker 4: All of a sudden everything can happen, and that's right,
Speaker 4: gamma ray or something and then super and nova or
Speaker 4: a lot of possibilities which can kill us in a moment.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you another question real quickly before I
Speaker 1: let you go, and that is the codex verdicus. You
Speaker 1: believe there's a chemical synthesis machine. And when you say that,
Speaker 1: is that codecs similar to the others where we're looking
Speaker 1: at drawings or representations of machinery.
Speaker 4: I think they compliment each other to a certain degree
Speaker 4: that they have this similar or maybe the same content.
Speaker 4: And I think this is also natural. If creation was
Speaker 4: of that importance to the priests in the Maya civilization
Speaker 4: or in earlier civilizations, then all the the or most
Speaker 4: of the qualities should deal with this topic. And in fact,
Speaker 4: you find surprising exact replications of how proteins are built,
Speaker 4: so you can really see how the double strand of
Speaker 4: the DNA is separated into two single strands, and one
Speaker 4: of these single stands, the so called aaron a, is
Speaker 4: used in a ribosome, which is again the unbelievable complicated
Speaker 4: enzon a catalyst and in this is the amino acids
Speaker 4: are linked to each other to build a protein.
Speaker 1: This is.
Speaker 4: This is one of the biggest miracle in life. The
Speaker 4: ribosome is such a complicated molecule and to produce it,
Speaker 4: it's made out of proteins. But it's also the only
Speaker 4: machine in our body, machine in our body which is
Speaker 4: capable to produce proteins. That means a machine which is
Speaker 4: only capable to produce the equipment or the parts for itself.
Speaker 4: And so this is this is a circulus vitosis. It's impossible.
Speaker 4: And there there we need a creator and not an alien.
Speaker 4: But in that case we need somebody who is steering life.
Speaker 4: In total. Though I'm not an atheist, I really believe
Speaker 4: in God, and I think this is a an egg
Speaker 4: of God that life exists, otherwise it would not be possible.
Speaker 1: Fantastic. I want to mention to our listeners that the
Speaker 1: book The True Prehistory is now available on Amazon and
Speaker 1: it's the English version, but also it's been translated from
Speaker 1: the original which is in German, so you can get
Speaker 1: the German German or in.
Speaker 4: Line is Dead Boy again. The line book deb Sorrey the.
Speaker 1: Book's available in English.
Speaker 4: Now, yes, that's right, it's a in English and since
Speaker 4: the beginning of November, I sink, so you can buy it.
Speaker 4: I do not know what's the prize in dollars is
Speaker 4: it's ninety nineteen Europe and you can also buy it
Speaker 4: as an ebook for a far lower price in euro
Speaker 4: it's four and dollar issume five something like that.
Speaker 1: Yeahographs are excellent. Yeah. Where does the Bourguee Codex result is? That?
Speaker 1: Is it in Spain or in the Vatican?
Speaker 4: Now everything okay? In that everything is in the Vatican
Speaker 4: Museum in Rome. So I think there's little in Spain,
Speaker 4: maybe a few one but not the important one. The
Speaker 4: important one ones uh in the Vatican, and one is
Speaker 4: surprisingly indrast in Germany. I do not know why, but
Speaker 4: there is the so called Codex trist in this and
Speaker 4: this is the codex which deals with calendar and time
Speaker 4: conting and things like that. So this is in Germany,
Speaker 4: in Resting City, in Saxonia, and most of the other
Speaker 4: cod it says, which deal with this creation and with
Speaker 4: biochemistry and these things, they are in Rome, but I
Speaker 4: think they are not for the public. So I don't
Speaker 4: think you can go there and have a look at it,
Speaker 4: but you can find it in the internet. Fantastic, so
Speaker 4: no problem, there's an internet website is shown, big expectation.
Speaker 1: Hmm, Hellois, thank you for joining me. Much luck on
Speaker 1: this new book. And uh, let's uh see what else
Speaker 1: comes out of your writing in the future. Looking forward
Speaker 1: to it.
Speaker 4: Oh, okay, if it was the honor to speak to you,
Speaker 4: and yeah, if you have another interesting topic you think
Speaker 4: it's worse. Who disgusting me? Please let me know.
Speaker 1: This is the first theory I've heard about the codices
Speaker 1: that gets in the technical diearys, schematics for machines, genome
Speaker 1: splicing and such. And this is from somebody who sees
Speaker 1: this kind of documentation all the time. That's our guest today.
Speaker 1: And this book is unique because he actually shows the
Speaker 1: codus in its full color, and next to it he'll
Speaker 1: show the modern version of it. And it's remarkable and
Speaker 1: it's something I have not heard of before. And I
Speaker 1: can see why he was published on the Graham Hancock website.
Speaker 1: But more importantly, Graham felt strong enough to have help
Speaker 1: him publish the book in its entirety. So I'm going
Speaker 1: to take a closer look at it. I looked at
Speaker 1: the first part of it. The other thing that's interesting
Speaker 1: that we didn't have time to discuss is the fact
Speaker 1: that his belief is that Homo sapeiy and sapient us
Speaker 1: we are genetically engineered. We are not well, I mean,
Speaker 1: we're native to Earth, but we have the genetic complements
Speaker 1: of ets off world types. And you know, and when
Speaker 1: I hear this kind of thing, you gotta wonder, what
Speaker 1: are all these UAPs doing? What what is all this
Speaker 1: activity going on? Are these anything to do with our past?
Speaker 1: And I'm beginning to think it might be possible. So
Speaker 1: get the book. It's just come out, A True Prehistory,
Speaker 1: And you can see it's a red cover and there's
Speaker 1: a there's an interesting graphic on the on the cover.
Speaker 1: It's one of the codis pages. A True Prehistory, a
Speaker 1: unofficial history of Heaven, Man and Earth. I think we're
Speaker 1: gonna hear more about this in the coming weeks, months, years,
Speaker 1: because you know, these are the only documents we have
Speaker 1: from Ice age or even before that culture. Is it Atlantis,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but it's very sophisticated Maya. It's the
Speaker 1: fine the founders, it's the established Maya who came and
Speaker 1: settled in present day Mexican Mexico. That was fun. Hey,
Speaker 1: if you're enjoying Earth Ancient's Destiny and Earth Ancients Special Edition,
Speaker 1: please consider becoming a subscriber for as little as five
Speaker 1: dollars a month. You can support the work we do
Speaker 1: on these podcasts, and we do have expenses. And to
Speaker 1: become a subscriber, go to Patreon it's pa t r
Speaker 1: eon dot com, Forward Slash Earth Ancients and subscribe. We
Speaker 1: got a whole library of gifts for you in the
Speaker 1: form of digital e books, and all you gotta do
Speaker 1: is when you register, you go right into the library,
Speaker 1: select a couple of books, check them out. Now they're
Speaker 1: digital books, which means they sit and reside on your
Speaker 1: computer desktop. But you have an amazing selection of ancient history, UFO, UAP,
Speaker 1: paranormal and such types of material books that you can
Speaker 1: choose from. So to become subscriber and check that out,
Speaker 1: go to Patreon dot com Forward Slash Earth Ancients. All right,
Speaker 1: that's it for this program. I want to think my
Speaker 1: guest today Alloys Airing, coming to us from Germany. As
Speaker 1: always the team of Gaeltour, Mark Foster and Feya Parvar.
Speaker 1: You guys rock all right, take care of you, will
Speaker 1: and we will talk to you next time
Speaker 5: In