Speaker 1: Six one seven two six six, sixty eight sixty eight
Speaker 1: is the number. Okay, let's go right back to Natalie
Speaker 1: and Lunenburg. Natalie, you asked a really good question. Can Trump, sorry,
Speaker 1: can Obama use the Trump famous Supreme Court case about
Speaker 1: presidential immunity to get out of it? Can he somehow
Speaker 1: wiggle away from going to jail over this? Now we'll see.
Speaker 1: I don't think he can. I don't think how this
Speaker 1: falls under his core responsibilities. But Natalie, let's just say,
Speaker 1: for the sake of argument, he has to rely on
Speaker 1: presidential immunity. He's it's a damning admission of guilt on
Speaker 1: his part, even if he's not, you know, doesn't go
Speaker 1: to jail. If he's got to say, okay, fine, I'm guilty,
Speaker 1: but you just can't touch me because I was president
Speaker 1: at the time, he'll his reputation will never recover. And
Speaker 1: number one number two, it doesn't prevent Hillary. She's not
Speaker 1: covered under presidential immunity. Or Brennan or call Mey or
Speaker 1: Clapper or mckab or Susan Rice. You can run down
Speaker 1: the list. So what I'm saying is they can still
Speaker 1: lock a lot of people up. The question is does
Speaker 1: Pam BONDI have what it takes to do it. Natalie,
Speaker 1: what say you?
Speaker 2: I'm skeptical on that, and that leads to my second
Speaker 2: skepticism of any justice in this matter. Don't do Am
Speaker 2: I incorrect? Or am I correct? Do these charges not
Speaker 2: have to be brought forth before grand jury in the
Speaker 2: District of Columbia because do you think just a grand
Speaker 2: jury in that district would ever ever indict any of
Speaker 2: these characters. I don't.
Speaker 1: Well, I think they would try to move it to
Speaker 1: Florida or Texas or you know, get it out of
Speaker 1: Virginia or wherever. You're right. I think they don't want
Speaker 1: to keep it in DC. But you're saying, even if
Speaker 1: we had someone that was eager, you think this will
Speaker 1: probably end up in front of a DC grand jury.
Speaker 1: And it is so partisan, so pro Democrat, that they
Speaker 1: wouldn't indict. I mean, they wouldn't indict at till of
Speaker 1: the hunt if they had, you know, if they if
Speaker 1: they could, if if Attila was a Democrat. Correct.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is like you know, going after Trump for
Speaker 2: eating a slice of pepperoni on Good Friday. You know,
Speaker 2: they'll go after him with everything they have. These guys
Speaker 2: and the weight of evidence. I'm Jeff, tell me I'm wrong.
Speaker 2: But every cyber of my being a saying no, it'll
Speaker 2: be buried, suppressed. And these guys are going to skate
Speaker 2: and they're gonna laugh about it, and the media is
Speaker 2: just going to bury it. They're gonna suppress it like
Speaker 2: they always have. What's gonna change?
Speaker 1: Just honestly, Natalie, what's this is? I mean, this is
Speaker 1: what's moving the needle right now. Trump wants indictments. Trump
Speaker 1: is ready to put these people to jail. He controls
Speaker 1: through Pambondi and cash Betel, obviously, but he controls the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, he controls the FBI, and he now
Speaker 1: controls the intelligence community through Tulsa Gabbard. And she has
Speaker 1: served them up on a silver platter. This I mean,
Speaker 1: you want to talk about a slam dunk, She's given
Speaker 1: them now a slam dunk. So what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: if Trump, you know he's going to war, If Trump
Speaker 1: wants to go to war and he wants to finish
Speaker 1: off his enemies, she's given them all the ammunition he
Speaker 1: needs to do it. So that's that's why they're worried.
Speaker 1: See Nowally, the thing is you can tell by their reaction.
Speaker 1: They're panicking. Obama's in a full panic. Here, I'll play
Speaker 1: you the cut. James Clapper is already lawyered up. Clapper
Speaker 1: is scared out of his mind. Clapper knows it. They
Speaker 1: got him on perjury, just on perjury alone, They've got him,
Speaker 1: never mind the more serious crimes. Camy is now white
Speaker 1: as a ghost. He's he's going berserk on social media.
Speaker 1: Apparently Brennan's already developed an ulcer. I'm not kidding, they say,
Speaker 1: apparently he's got stomach issues. He's got a bad ulcer now.
Speaker 1: So they're panicking because she delivered it. You know, this
Speaker 1: is what's different this time is you've got the documents, emails, memos,
Speaker 1: I mean, she's You've got it all declassified documents, You've
Speaker 1: got their signatures. You just you know, really, it's it's
Speaker 1: the only thing they didn't say was we are guilty.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's she's got him six ways to Sunday.
Speaker 1: That's why they're nervous. That's why, to be honest, Natalie,
Speaker 1: the talk in Washington now is someone may be willing
Speaker 1: to cop a plea. There could be talk of a
Speaker 1: plea deal, and I think Trump would even take that,
Speaker 1: even if it meant say, like no prison time, but
Speaker 1: just the admission of guilt alone would savage the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party and the deep state.
Speaker 3: A final word to you, Natalie Ears on Watergate is
Speaker 3: this horrible, horrible scandal.
Speaker 2: It brought down Nixon. The Democrats are still crowing about it.
Speaker 2: What did he do? I mean, seriously, think about it
Speaker 2: with the hindsight of fifty years. It's like he did
Speaker 2: what he was in trouble for, what, you know, covering
Speaker 2: up a two bit breaking that he didn't know about
Speaker 2: anything about at the time. And it's like, this is
Speaker 2: unbelievable what we just regularly accept right now. We've been conditioned,
Speaker 2: like that slowly boiling frog to just accept all of
Speaker 2: this corruption. And I'm thinking that maybe Collapper, maybe Brennan McCabe,
Speaker 2: they might get indicted. You know, they're all out to
Speaker 2: pasture white men and nobody cares anymore. Yeah, we'll sacrifice
Speaker 2: them to preserve the deer later. Yeah, that's that's my
Speaker 2: best case scenario. I hope I'm wrong. Jeff, tell me
Speaker 2: I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: Uh, Natalie, I don't want to say you're wrong, because
Speaker 1: I look, I'm where I don't have confidence in the
Speaker 1: in either cash, Ptel or Pambondiu. But look, let's to me,
Speaker 1: if we could get Brennan call me and Clapper, that
Speaker 1: would be incredible. Look, I want the dear leader. Don't
Speaker 1: get me wrong, but even that, you know, who's been
Speaker 1: arrested ever for the Democrats, whoever goes to jail? Nobody.
Speaker 1: So you know, I'm like, can't we just arrest and
Speaker 1: put somebody in jail, somebody so that the least people
Speaker 1: in the deep state, these criminals know there are some
Speaker 1: possible consequences, so they'll think twice the next time and
Speaker 1: won't do it again. Six one seven two six, six
Speaker 1: sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay, very very quick.
Speaker 1: You got to hear this. You got to hear it
Speaker 1: to believe it. So ironically, you want to see how
Speaker 1: dumb they were, Like, you know, if you want, call
Speaker 1: me Brannan Clapper, the Three Stooges. Okay, you want to
Speaker 1: see how dumb the Three Stooges were. This is Clapper
Speaker 1: on CNN in twenty eighteen, where he inadvertently actually admits
Speaker 1: that Obama ordered the intelligence community assessment that we now
Speaker 1: know was a massive lie. And that Obama was setting
Speaker 1: Trump up as an agent of Russia, that this was
Speaker 1: the order that set up this false narrative of the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion hoax. Now, of course he doesn't say it's false,
Speaker 1: but he actually says, oh, yeah, no, no, this was
Speaker 1: all Obama. This was all everything. I think we're talking
Speaker 1: a Russia collusion, it's all because of Obama. He actually
Speaker 1: dams Obama. Now in retrospect, listen now to this roll
Speaker 1: cut for Mike.
Speaker 3: At one point I'd like to make Anderson, I don't
Speaker 3: think has come up very much before, And I'm alluding
Speaker 3: now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all
Speaker 3: that he did or didn't do before he left office
Speaker 3: with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for
Speaker 3: President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community
Speaker 3: assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence
Speaker 3: of events which are unfolding today, notably a Special Council
Speaker 3: Molors investigation. President Obama is responsible to that, and was
Speaker 3: he who tasked us to do that intelligen community assessment
Speaker 3: in the first place. I think that's an important point
Speaker 3: when it comes to critiquing person Obama.
Speaker 1: This is incredible. This isn't great. So he's even admit,
Speaker 1: that's how dummy is. So he's like, no, no, that's
Speaker 1: not Hey, hey, the reason why we're even talking about
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collosion, it's because of the dear Leader. He's
Speaker 1: the one that said, do the intelligence community assessment. Guys.
Speaker 1: You got Hey, this is what I want you guys
Speaker 1: to do. You ordered us to do this. I swear
Speaker 1: you can't make this up. Now the evidence is now,
Speaker 1: it's it's damning, it's overwhelming, it's clearly irrefutable. There's no
Speaker 1: question now. So this is how the media is now
Speaker 1: attacking Tulsi Gabbard. If you don't have the facts, if
Speaker 1: you don't have the evidence, if you don't have the law,
Speaker 1: then you have to go after character. You gotta go
Speaker 1: ad hominem. You've got to go personal, you gotta go low,
Speaker 1: you gotta go dirty. Soh CNN rolls out Caitlin Collins
Speaker 1: and what she is is she's a political assassin. All
Speaker 1: she does now, that's all she does is hit job
Speaker 1: after hit job. So they roll out this liar and
Speaker 1: this propagandist CNN does at the Tulsi Gabbard White House
Speaker 1: presser yesterday. And if you remember, there was a clash
Speaker 1: between Tulsi and Trump during the Israel Iran War, whereby
Speaker 1: initially Tulsi said, well, I'm not so sure that we
Speaker 1: have the evidence that Iran is now fully committed to
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapons program, and then she explained it more
Speaker 1: in detail, but there was a bit of friction between
Speaker 1: her and Trump for about twenty four forty eight hours.
Speaker 1: So listen now how CNN and the media now is
Speaker 1: trying to spin this roll cut three A. Oh, and
Speaker 1: just that you know, Caroline Levitt is right beside Tulsi
Speaker 1: and she will jump in to defend Tulsi because now
Speaker 1: the argument is you're just trying to suck up the Trump.
Speaker 1: Isn't that why you're releasing all the disclassified information. It's
Speaker 1: because you weren't in good graces with Trump and now
Speaker 1: you want to get back into his good graces. This
Speaker 1: is all about you wanting Trump's approval, isn't it. Roll
Speaker 1: cut three A.
Speaker 4: Mike, what would you say to people who believe that
Speaker 4: you're only releasing these documents now to improve your standing
Speaker 4: with the president after he said that your intelligence assessment
Speaker 4: were wrong.
Speaker 5: The only people who are suggesting that the Director of
Speaker 5: National Intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her
Speaker 5: standing with the president. Are the people in this room
Speaker 5: who constantly try to sew distrust and chaos amongst the
Speaker 5: president's cabinet and it is not working.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is unbelievable. This is unbelievable. So this
Speaker 1: is about improving your standing with Trump? Now notice, okay again,
Speaker 1: what does this have to do with the overwhelming evidence
Speaker 1: that she presented yesterday? Whatever TWLSA Gabbard's motives are. She
Speaker 1: wants to suck up the Trump, she wants to re
Speaker 1: establish a warm relationship with him, whatever, who cares. Who
Speaker 1: cares whether she's doing it out of noble patriotic reasons
Speaker 1: or because she wants her boss to like her. Again,
Speaker 1: the facts are the facts, The evidence is the evidence.
Speaker 1: The crimes are the crimes. The treason is the treason. Hello,
Speaker 1: but this is what I mean, This is what passes
Speaker 1: for journalism today. So I want to ask all of you.
Speaker 1: It is the Kooner Country Pole Question of the Day
Speaker 1: sponsored by Marios Mario's Quality Roofing, Siding and Windows. Did
Speaker 1: DNI Tulsia Gabbard release the Russia Gate intelligence reports because
Speaker 1: A she believes in transparency or B she is trying
Speaker 1: to get in good with President Trump, which is what
Speaker 1: now the media is trying to claim. So a transparency
Speaker 1: B sucking up to Trump. To me, I think it's
Speaker 1: pretty obvious she's basically putting her entire life on the
Speaker 1: line and the media is going to eat this poor
Speaker 1: woman alive. I don't think it's to suck up to Trump.
Speaker 1: I think it's clear she's a patriot who is speaking
Speaker 1: truth to power. But that's me transparency. I think it's
Speaker 1: a all the way. But I want to hear from
Speaker 1: you a transparency B sucking up to Trump? You can
Speaker 1: vote on our web page wrko dot com slash cooner
Speaker 1: wrko dot com slash cooner kuh n in national Er.
Speaker 1: As always, you can vote on X again. Last night
Speaker 1: I was very active on X exposing what Tulsi had
Speaker 1: revealed and Obama's and Hillary's nefarious role in all of this.
Speaker 1: So if you want to vote via X, my handle
Speaker 1: there at the Kooner Report all one word k u
Speaker 1: h and as in national Er, Alex in the Freedom State, Florida.
Speaker 1: Thanks for holding Alex and welcome.
Speaker 6: Hey Jeff, thanks for taking my call again, I appreciate it, my.
Speaker 1: Pleasure, the fact that you take my call.
Speaker 6: No matter what I have to talk about from previous calls.
Speaker 6: But the thing is Trump.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 6: It's like he keeps making horrible decisions on attorney generals.
Speaker 6: I just don't get it. And I don't know if
Speaker 6: you recall back to the OJ Simpson trial where he
Speaker 6: once they acquitted him, the juror came out and I
Speaker 6: can remember it like it was yesterday and I'm still
Speaker 6: gagging from it, where she came out and she said,
Speaker 6: I think we made the right decision. You could she
Speaker 6: was a horrible actor, Pam BONDI is the same thing
Speaker 6: when I heard her say, oh, this is President Trump
Speaker 6: and we are going to release all the documents because.
Speaker 1: He Alex, please hang on. I'm up against the break.
Speaker 1: Alex is basically, you know, arguing, and I think it's
Speaker 1: a very good, you know, very very valid concern. Six
Speaker 1: one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
Speaker 1: the number. Okay, my friends, I want to go right
Speaker 1: back to Alex in Florida. But just before I do,
Speaker 1: brilliant text, absolutely brilliant text. You can text as seven
Speaker 1: zero four seven zero seven zero four seven zero. And
Speaker 1: I think this is what Obama now is really relying on.
Speaker 1: And I think it's Brennan, it's Clapper, it's Comy Biden
Speaker 1: to a lesser extent, Hillary. There's no question now which
Speaker 1: is the propaganda media or the state run media, whatever
Speaker 1: you want to call it. And this is what five
Speaker 1: O eight says Jeff. Remember when under the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: the Smith Month Act was gutted, which then made it
Speaker 1: lawful for the government, which includes the CIA or the
Speaker 1: Intelligence community, to propagandiz i e. Lie within the United
Speaker 1: States and to its citizens, including directly employing the media.
Speaker 1: I believe this was Obama's foresight into the future when
Speaker 1: he might need an insurance policy a legal defense for
Speaker 1: his crimes to come. And I agree. I think there's
Speaker 1: no question. There's no question now they're not arguing the evidence.
Speaker 1: If you've noticed now, they're trying to avoid it, ignore it,
Speaker 1: bury it, sweep it under the rug, pretend it's not happening,
Speaker 1: or just call it a conspiracy theory, or attacked Tulca
Speaker 1: Gabbart her motives. Remember Hillary called her a Russian asset.
Speaker 1: She also called remember Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate.
Speaker 1: She was also a Russian asset. Remember Tucker Carlson was
Speaker 1: a Russian asset. Steve Bannon was a Russian asset. Do
Speaker 1: you remember I was a Russian asset? Do you remember that?
Speaker 1: So that's all they have now are these slanderous, libelous,
Speaker 1: defamatory attacks. But that can only go so far. Now
Speaker 1: what are they going to do now when you have
Speaker 1: whistleblowers coming out today and tomorrow. What are they going
Speaker 1: to say then? In other words, it's just going to
Speaker 1: get worse and worse very quickly. Because Alex is holding
Speaker 1: and I want to go to him. You want you
Speaker 1: want to know how serious this is now getting. I
Speaker 1: want you to listen to this. They're running on CNN.
Speaker 1: Okay Clapper is now former DNI James Clopper goes on
Speaker 1: CNN and says, I've already got a lawyer. He goes,
Speaker 1: I'm going to get prosecuted by the dj I can
Speaker 1: see it. It's coming. Roll cut seven. Mike, do you.
Speaker 5: Have concerns that they will attempt to prosecute you?
Speaker 7: Well, certainly, I do. You know after eight and a
Speaker 7: half years of this, and I don't know of an
Speaker 7: intelligence product that was more scrutinized, more investigated than that
Speaker 7: product was, by numerous people. You know, it's very disconcerting,
Speaker 7: it really is. And I take seriously when president of
Speaker 7: the United States accuses me of being a participant in
Speaker 7: a treason, this conspiracy, which is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what's your reaction to that?
Speaker 7: Tradiculous? It just is, it is untrue.
Speaker 4: So what will you do if they come after you?
Speaker 4: What is your plan?
Speaker 7: Well, I'll lawyer up. I suppose already.
Speaker 5: Have you've already hired attorneys in case of an anticipation
Speaker 5: that this Trump storm I could.
Speaker 4: Try to prosecute.
Speaker 7: We've had sort of perpetual attorneys since I left the
Speaker 7: government in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: So there you go. Listen and notice, does this guy
Speaker 1: look to you like an innocent Does he sound you're
Speaker 1: like an innocent man? By the way, this guy who's
Speaker 1: repeatedly light under oath, there's no question. Does this incorrigible,
Speaker 1: pathological liar? Nah? And I gotta tell you, he looks defeated,
Speaker 1: He sounds defeated. Ah. You can break Clapper. You're gonna
Speaker 1: break McCabe. You can break call Me, you can break Brennan,
Speaker 1: you can break Clapper. So one of them is gonna flip,
Speaker 1: and all you need is one. And when one flips,
Speaker 1: it's like a it's like a domino. Then they all
Speaker 1: the first one falls and everyone else starts to fall
Speaker 1: after it. All right, let's go back to Alex in Florida.
Speaker 1: Thank you for holding Alex. Alex, you are making some
Speaker 1: very very good points. A will a jury have the
Speaker 1: common sense and the courage to make a conviction. And
Speaker 1: even more than that, Pam Bondi, is she a serious prosecutor,
Speaker 1: because this is the greatest scandal in American history? Does
Speaker 1: she have the depth, the fortitude, the intelligence, the courage,
Speaker 1: the skills, the low yerly skills to go through with
Speaker 1: this prosecution and win it? Or are we going to
Speaker 1: look at another OJ Simpson fiasco? Please, Alex, pick up
Speaker 1: where you left off.
Speaker 6: Harry Jeff. What I was trying to say is I
Speaker 6: recall the juror from the OJ Simpson trial, and I'm
Speaker 6: comparing her to Bondy. When after they gave oj an acquittal,
Speaker 6: she said, I think they interviewed her and she said,
Speaker 6: I think we made the right decision, and you could
Speaker 6: tell she was insincere. And when I heard the media
Speaker 6: ask bond Pam Bondy, if they're going to release the
Speaker 6: Epstein files. This was a month ago. She said, yes,
Speaker 6: Donald Trump's going to keep to all his campaign promises,
Speaker 6: and it's Donald Trump, and yes, we are going to
Speaker 6: release them. She seems so insincere, like she was a
Speaker 6: very bad actress. And I can't help but to believe
Speaker 6: that they that they already showed her the evidence of
Speaker 6: Obama and them with all the Russia Russia hoax, and
Speaker 6: she is not going after it and after them, and
Speaker 6: I would. I can't help but to think that possibly
Speaker 6: Tulsea Gabbert is now taking it on herself to show
Speaker 6: the evidence to everybody. But it's not going to matter.
Speaker 6: And I'm disappointed that Trump can't seem to get a
Speaker 6: good attorney general. I don't know what his problem.
Speaker 1: No, I agree, No, Alex, listen, I think you put
Speaker 1: your finger right on it. Look, you know, I love
Speaker 1: the guy, and I think he's one of the greatest,
Speaker 1: maybe even now the greatest president in American history. I
Speaker 1: don't know, it's still debatable, but he's certainly way at
Speaker 1: the top. I've never seen the first six months. We
Speaker 1: just passed a six month mark. The only other president.
Speaker 1: They're comparing him to his FDR. And I don't want
Speaker 1: to get sidetracked. I want to stay on topic. But
Speaker 1: look at the first six months, you know, the first
Speaker 1: hundred days. They said, oh my god, what did have
Speaker 1: you know? FDR passed all this flurry of legislation, but
Speaker 1: most of it didn't work. Like I'm sorry, I don't
Speaker 1: want to get into the Great Depression now, but just
Speaker 1: give me ten seconds. The New Deal never got us
Speaker 1: out of the depression. The New Deal was an absolute failure.
Speaker 1: It never restored growth, it never restored on a high employment.
Speaker 1: It never got us out of it, never gave us
Speaker 1: economic recovery. The New Deal was a disaster. It failed.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you just I'm stating the facts. Look at
Speaker 1: unemployment when FDR came into power. Look at unemployment nearly
Speaker 1: eight years later, when we go to war, actually nine
Speaker 1: years later, when we go to war, you know, World
Speaker 1: War two. To say, the unemployment rate never got higher,
Speaker 1: I mean sorry, never got lower. Forgive me, employment never
Speaker 1: got higher. So, yes, a lot of things were passed.
Speaker 1: If you're just looking for volume, yeah, okay. But if
Speaker 1: you're looking for volume and effectiveness, this is Trump it's
Speaker 1: not just that he's done a lot, it's almost everything
Speaker 1: he's done is incredibly successful and incredibly effective. So what
Speaker 1: I'm saying is I love the guy. I think he's
Speaker 1: another I can you imagine We've got three and a
Speaker 1: half more years of this. But he's got a weakness.
Speaker 1: He's got an achilles heeled. There's a weakness. You know,
Speaker 1: every strength has a weakness, every weakness has a strength.
Speaker 1: For whatever reason, that ag slot continues to haunt him.
Speaker 1: And frankly, FBI director, I don't know what it is,
Speaker 1: whether it was Sessions and then Bill Barr and now PAMBONDI. Now,
Speaker 1: to be fair, I'm not going to close the book
Speaker 1: on her. I'll tell you why, because she may go
Speaker 1: ahead and issue indictments, she may go ahead and actually
Speaker 1: charge people.
Speaker 4: To me.
Speaker 1: I look at this in a sports analogy. This is
Speaker 1: her super Bowl. Now, she's the starting quarterback. Can she
Speaker 1: take her team to victory? Can she get the job done? Now?
Speaker 1: If she blinks on this, she has to go. She
Speaker 1: has to go. And this is not even a tough call.
Speaker 1: And let me just say one other thing, because this
Speaker 1: is very important. Tulca Gabbart is not just bringing the
Speaker 1: receipts a tremendous personal cost, and at really the risk
Speaker 1: of her life. You know, you asked who's willing to
Speaker 1: take on the entire deep state?
Speaker 4: She is.
Speaker 1: Who's willing to take on the entire Obama Clinton Biden
Speaker 1: machine and the entire media to boot she is. That's
Speaker 1: one tough lady man. That's a tough cookie. I admire her,
Speaker 1: I respect her, but it's almost like you can never
Speaker 1: do overkill, right, when you have evidence of treason, you
Speaker 1: always want more and more. But what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: there's so much now that she's laying putting on the table.
Speaker 1: It's almost like she's shaming Bondie. As I said earlier,
Speaker 1: it's almost like like she's pushing her, like come on,
Speaker 1: And it's not just the evidence that she's rolling out.
Speaker 1: If you listen now to some of her press conferences,
Speaker 1: in her media interviews, it's like, well, yeah, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm going to the DJ. She keeps saying it, I'm
Speaker 1: miss youing a criminal referral. Yes, I have. There needs
Speaker 1: to be prosecutions, there needs to be indictments. Then she's
Speaker 1: saying no, no, and on Obama, there needs I've issued a
Speaker 1: criminal referral. She's got to invite them. So it's almost
Speaker 1: like I'm going to push her and push her and
Speaker 1: push her or at least shame her that come on,
Speaker 1: do the right thing and start inviting people. So, I mean,
Speaker 1: we'll see if it works. But you can tell Bondie's reluctant,
Speaker 1: there's no question, and Cash Ptel and Dan Bongina, all
Speaker 1: all those guys. I mean, you know, seriously, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't think you know, I don't think
Speaker 1: much of them. But it's clear Trump and Gabbert and JD.
Speaker 1: Vance in the back, Just to let you know, in
Speaker 1: the back J D Vance is backing Trump and Tulsi
Speaker 1: Gabbert all the way, but publicly it's Trump and Tulsi
Speaker 1: they're driving this. Six one seven two six six sixty
Speaker 1: eight sixty eight is the number. Susan in Ashland. Thanks
Speaker 1: for holding. Oh sorry, Suzanne, my bad. Suzanne in Ashland.
Speaker 1: Thanks for holding, Suzanne, and welcome, Jeff.
Speaker 6: Good morning.
Speaker 4: How are you today?
Speaker 1: I'm very good? How are you? Suzanne?
Speaker 4: Couldn't be better? Jeff? This feels different to me in
Speaker 4: so many ways. You know, one of your callers that
Speaker 4: are earlier where everyone's conditioned for things to be the
Speaker 4: way they've been, you know, the lying and the and
Speaker 4: the covering up, and it's led to disappointment on the right,
Speaker 4: and it's led to you know, the left is going
Speaker 4: along with the headline and the lies. This to me
Speaker 4: feels like there's some empathy involved for for for Americans
Speaker 4: in that their spoons they have the goods. This little different.
Speaker 4: It's it's lock stock and barrel dung in terms of
Speaker 4: the evidence. But it feels to me like they are
Speaker 4: gently introducing this evidence and let people get comfortable and
Speaker 4: people who have been you know, have the trumped arrangement
Speaker 4: syndrome to get their heads around the fact that they
Speaker 4: have been lied to as we all know, the Maga
Speaker 4: Maga and the Kuna crowd for the last ten years plus.
Speaker 4: So it's it's really a conditioning for the turn around
Speaker 4: that's about to come. And I would say this, I
Speaker 4: wonder if we're with the Congress going on break that
Speaker 4: this is so serious. And when you listen to Trump,
Speaker 4: if you're really listening to Trump, he's throwing signals to
Speaker 4: Maga country every day. You know, you know what he
Speaker 4: is common about Hillary? You know, we let her go
Speaker 4: the first time, I just felt it wasn't right. And
Speaker 4: now he's signaling otherwise. So what if this is condition
Speaker 4: them with the proof, condition them with the proof. And
Speaker 4: I still feel that they have somewhere somehow, very soon
Speaker 4: the emails from Hillary's illegal server are going to come
Speaker 4: come to the front burner. But let that go. I
Speaker 4: think they're conditioning everybody for what's about to happen in
Speaker 4: the month of August. Well, Congress is on vacation.
Speaker 1: Well, I think, Susanne, I think you're making absolutely outstanding points.
Speaker 1: And just I can only piggyback off of what you're saying.
Speaker 1: You know who else is pushing the email server, Hillary's
Speaker 1: email server and says, no, we're going to go back
Speaker 1: and we got to revisit this, Taulci Gabbard. And so
Speaker 1: now I just want to ask everybody this, this, this
Speaker 1: is what many of you are saying on the text line,
Speaker 1: and I'm starting to agree with you objectively. Now just
Speaker 1: stand back. Who is Donald Trump? Yes, maga America first
Speaker 1: I two times, you know, second term, very successful president.
Speaker 1: But remember, for most of his life, what was he
Speaker 1: He was a Democrat. He was a Democrat. He's only
Speaker 1: been a Republican much later in his life. Now, Tulca Gabbard.
Speaker 1: What's Tulci Gabbard? Another one former Democrat? She's been a
Speaker 1: Democrat for most of her life.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: I don't want to get sidetracked, but you know, Robert F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy Jr. Because this is such a massive manumental scandal.
Speaker 1: I haven't had a chance to get into everything that
Speaker 1: Robert F. Kennedy's accomplishing as Health and Human Services Secretary.
Speaker 1: You know, Maha, make America healthy again. But man, this
Speaker 1: guy is delivering. This guy is a closer. He doesn't
Speaker 1: mess around. What's what's Robert F. Kennedy Junior? It's a
Speaker 1: former Democrat. What I'm saying is you always ask, we
Speaker 1: always say, well what would democrats do? And say what
Speaker 1: you want? Democrats play smash mouth football. Democrats today. When
Speaker 1: they say they're going to indict, they indict. When Democrats
Speaker 1: say they're going after you, they go after you. It's
Speaker 1: only the Republicans talk talk, talk, and nothing comes of it.
Speaker 1: And that's why, as you were mentioning, Suzanne, we're always
Speaker 1: constantly disappointed. But this time, as you put it, something
Speaker 1: feels different. I want to read to you Suzanne, a
Speaker 1: brilliant text that I got nine one seven, And I
Speaker 1: think this is checkmate argument, Jeff. If baraq Hussein, Obama
Speaker 1: and his seditious administration don't get indicted, arrested, and prosecuted
Speaker 1: for treason, then we are no longer a serious country.
Speaker 1: Just ask yourself, to all of you, please listen to this.
Speaker 1: Just ask yourself if this situation was reversed and it
Speaker 1: was Trump not Obama, what do you think would happen
Speaker 1: to Trump? Let me seriously, nine one seven. You're a genius.
Speaker 1: Do you understand that you're a genius? Okay, IQ guaranteed
Speaker 1: one forty and above. I'm telling you you're a genius.
Speaker 1: Now just let me ask you, Susanne, Let me ask
Speaker 1: everybody in the audience. Flip it. It's all all the
Speaker 1: same information, everything except it wasn't Obama who ordered it,
Speaker 1: it was Trump. Everything else the same, everything else. What
Speaker 1: do you think the Democrats would do to Trump? Smash
Speaker 1: mouth football? He would be in handcuffs, They'd hang him
Speaker 1: from the freaking White House. They'd lunched a guy. He
Speaker 1: would be arrested. His vice president would be arrested. His
Speaker 1: National security advisor would be arrested his CIA director, FBI
Speaker 1: director is DNI. They would all be swinging from the
Speaker 1: legal trees, like, who are we kidding? Oh my god?
Speaker 1: Remember they drove Nixon out of office over nothing, a
Speaker 1: third rate burglary. He didn't even order, didn't even know
Speaker 1: it took place until after it happened, and they drove
Speaker 1: the guy out of office. What do you think they
Speaker 1: would do if this was Trump? It's finished, it's finished.
Speaker 1: So why this time does this smell different? Sense just
Speaker 1: seems different. You sense it's different. You got a former
Speaker 1: Democrat who's now in the White House. You've got a
Speaker 1: former Democrat who's the DNI, and they're not coming to play.
Speaker 1: In other words, if this was Trump, the Democrats would
Speaker 1: have finished him. Now Trump and Tulsi they're playing to win.
Speaker 1: They're going for the throat. And I think that's what's
Speaker 1: starting to seem different to everybody. And it's the same
Speaker 1: old rhino establishment Republicans who speak out of both sides
Speaker 1: of their mouth, who are unwilling to go through with this. Right,
Speaker 1: it's cash Btel, it's a Dan Bongino, It's uh, you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's Pambondie, always big mouth, big talk. You know,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan, he's a classic to me, biggest mouth on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. Nothing nothing, this guy ever doesn't do a thing.
Speaker 1: But no, no, you want something done, you want to
Speaker 1: take somebody out, have a Democrat do it, because they're serious.
Speaker 1: They don't play around. It's smash mouth football. Okay, I
Speaker 1: just punched you know what punch? I punched my hand
Speaker 1: like they it's it's a contact sport. Now, it's not
Speaker 1: just the evidence, it's the intensity of the evidence. It's
Speaker 1: the seriousness of the evidence. It's the determination behind the evidence.
Speaker 1: You can tell the Democrat for the first time, I've
Speaker 1: never seen it like this. The Democrats and the media
Speaker 1: are genuinely afraid. Suzanne. Final word to.
Speaker 4: You, Jeffrey, I just I envisioned that this is so
Speaker 4: like you said, it's so serious and so it is different.
Speaker 4: You know, Congress is on vacation coming up. What's to
Speaker 4: say that Trump, you know, has the goods, takes it
Speaker 4: off Pin Bondi's plate and just calls in the military
Speaker 4: to make these arrests in military tribunal because it's it's
Speaker 4: it's treason in the highest order.
Speaker 1: Susanne to the to the Texter's point. If it wasn't
Speaker 1: Obama who ordered this, just indulge me. It was Trump.
Speaker 1: Everything else is the same. What do you think would
Speaker 1: have happened to him? By now?
Speaker 4: You put away for life?
Speaker 1: For sure, Suzanne, thank you very much for that call.
Speaker 1: Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight?
Speaker 1: Is the number? Is the texture wrong? Am I wrong?
Speaker 1: All of you? Honestly you're listening to the show, same
Speaker 1: exact thing. Just flip it Trump instead of Obama? The Democrats?
Speaker 1: Now what would they have done by now? By now?
Speaker 1: Just what is it? Six days? Remember she declassified everything
Speaker 1: late last week, So what is that a week from now?
Speaker 1: A week past? Forgive me, it's been a week. What
Speaker 1: do you think in one week would have happened? There
Speaker 1: would have been indictments, charges, arrests, up, penats, Mike, I mean,
Speaker 1: you'd be they'd be all beginning rounded up,