Speaker 1: They love Tucker Carlson. And they love Tucker Carlson because
Speaker 1: say what you want about him, and I've had my criticisms.
Speaker 1: He is patriotic, he tells the truth, he speaks common sense.
Speaker 1: He's not afraid of anybody. He is a true American.
Speaker 1: He's not about the bullshit. People love him, and no
Speaker 1: one is going to cancel Tucker Carlson because Mark Levin
Speaker 1: said so. So people saw that statement and they said,
Speaker 1: you know what, it's about time. We're not getting rid
Speaker 1: of Tucker Carlson. We're not getting rid of Christ. We're
Speaker 1: not going to put America. Second, we're not actually obligated
Speaker 1: to support Israel. We can say what we want about them,
Speaker 1: and we don't need to like Nick Flentis, but he
Speaker 1: should have the same First Amendment rights and people should
Speaker 1: be able to talk to him if they disagree. Ninety
Speaker 1: eight percent of people agreed with every word of that
Speaker 1: and said it's about time.
Speaker 2: It's very rare that I do a show where I
Speaker 2: am genuinely concerned about the nature of the time at hand.
Speaker 2: I am genuinely concerned. However, when those times arise, I
Speaker 2: quickly recognize that I must that I have no choice
Speaker 2: but to proceed. And in this episode, I'm going to
Speaker 2: connect some dots, some very uncomfortable dots, and some of
Speaker 2: you are going to think I'm crazy, and the rest
Speaker 2: of you are going to be nodding along the entire time,
Speaker 2: going yep, that's exactly what's happening. So what am I
Speaker 2: talking about? Well, the knives are out once again for
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson, and the similarities between the cancelation attempt against
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson are eerily reminiscent to what transpired with Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk over the past two years.
Speaker 1: Specifically, it's about time that somebody stood up to the
Speaker 1: bullies because we've had enough. Everybody knows this is how
Speaker 1: it works. Everybody knows that if you have anything dissenting,
Speaker 1: anything critical to say about Israel, you will get these
Speaker 1: psychotic berserkers. That's their strategy. Laura Loomer, Josh Ham, Mark Levin,
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro. They will be on your case, bullying you,
Speaker 1: trying to intimidate you, working behind the scenes to get
Speaker 1: you fired, to get dirt on you, to blackmail you.
Speaker 1: That's how they operate.
Speaker 2: Now, before I get there, let me show you what
Speaker 2: I'm talking about. First up, we have Randy Fine, a
Speaker 2: congressional member out of my great state of Florida, and
Speaker 2: a man with a blood type that is Hollandaise sauce.
Speaker 3: Tucker Carlson is the most dangerous anti suommite in America.
Speaker 4: He has chosen.
Speaker 3: He has chosen to take on the mantle of leader
Speaker 3: of a modern day Hitler youth, to broadcast and feature
Speaker 3: those who celebrate the Nazis, those who call for the
Speaker 3: extermination of Israel, to defend Hamas, to even criticize President
Speaker 3: Trump for stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. Friends, make no mistake,
Speaker 3: Tucker is not maga.
Speaker 2: Look at that truly organic hatred towards Tucker Carlson with
Speaker 2: those well made, professionally made signs saying that Tucker isn't maga. Well,
Speaker 2: for the youngsters out there, you may not remember this,
Speaker 2: and probably most of you have never even heard of this,
Speaker 2: But as I said in my prior episode, Pat Buchanan
Speaker 2: was really the I don't know stalwart. He was the
Speaker 2: guy when it came to America first, long before Tucker Carlson,
Speaker 2: long before Nick Flint does or Dave or myself or
Speaker 2: anybody else. He was doing it. He was running for president.
Speaker 2: This is what happened to Pat Buchanan back in the nineties.
Speaker 5: I'm not everyone nothing, especially not his crowd that came
Speaker 5: in earlier. Nothing's gonna stop us from going forward to
Speaker 5: anywhere in a new century about to begin, and we
Speaker 5: could go to that her upgradist if we go forward together.
Speaker 2: Now the operations have improved in quality, but they haven't
Speaker 2: really changed in terms of tactics. It's the exact same thing,
Speaker 2: holding up a sign Buchanan as a racist, which by
Speaker 2: the way, laid the groundwork for the entire woke mind
Speaker 2: virus which took over this country over the preceding thirty years.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's the same thing, and it's for the
Speaker 2: same reason. It's because Tucker Carlson is doing what Pat
Speaker 2: Buchanan did. He's talking about America first and meaning it,
Speaker 2: which is not allowed. And you should really be asking
Speaker 2: yourself why that is. Why are you not allowed to
Speaker 2: prefer and prioritize your country over a four and one
Speaker 2: be that any other country on earth. It should be
Speaker 2: a given, as I said before, it should be completely acceptable,
Speaker 2: it should be universally understood. But in fact it's treated
Speaker 2: as the third rail of politics. It's treated as if
Speaker 2: you are instantly one of the most hateful people on
Speaker 2: the planet.
Speaker 6: And I just want the anti American, anti Israel, anti
Speaker 6: West crowd to understand something. You're gonna have to come
Speaker 6: through me and millions of people just like me, and
Speaker 6: you're not gonna make it. You think your stupid little podcast,
Speaker 6: or your stupid little subscription program, or your little TV
Speaker 6: show or maybe you have a little radio show is
Speaker 6: going to change the world, Like hell, it is not,
Speaker 6: if I and everybody else have something to say about it.
Speaker 2: Hi, Mark Levin Clint Russell, reporting for Liberty Lockdown. Yes,
Speaker 2: I do think my stupid little podcast can change the world,
Speaker 2: not this one individually, but collectively, people that are telling
Speaker 2: the truth, that aren't bought and paid for like you,
Speaker 2: People that actually have loyalty to this country, not a
Speaker 2: foreign one like you. So yeah, I actually do believe
Speaker 2: in free speech, and I do believe in telling the truth,
Speaker 2: and I do believe that I will prevail, and I
Speaker 2: do believe that if I have to go through you,
Speaker 2: I will prevail. Nonetheless, you do not intimidate me. You're
Speaker 2: an old man. Why would I possibly be intimidated of you?
Speaker 2: It's ridiculous. So you can talk tough, you can bluster her,
Speaker 2: you can bluff, but I'm not going to stop. And
Speaker 2: I don't think anybody's going to stop, at least I
Speaker 2: hope not. We have to proceed. We have to. We
Speaker 2: really don't have a choice, so I will. Next up,
Speaker 2: we have probably the dumbest member of the seven thousand
Speaker 2: dollars Club, and that would be Brandon Tatum.
Speaker 7: I see somebody with a sign said Tucker is not MAGA.
Speaker 7: I guess I gotta put his name out there. That's
Speaker 7: not maga. When you're on your platform and people are
Speaker 7: are acting as if Sharia law it's better than what
Speaker 7: we have here in America and the laws that have
Speaker 7: given to us by God through faith, you're a silly person.
Speaker 7: If you are out here and you don't know whether
Speaker 7: or not HAMAS is a terrorist organization or a political organization, you.
Speaker 4: Are a foolish person.
Speaker 7: And since I'm already name dropping, everybody saw that interview.
Speaker 7: You have a guy say that he supports Stalin and
Speaker 7: that he was a big fan of Stalin on your show.
Speaker 7: You can have him on the show, But Dog Gonneer,
Speaker 7: you better push back on people like that there's no
Speaker 7: way you could say that you're a Christian. There's no
Speaker 7: way you can say you believe in God and you
Speaker 7: support a person like Joseph Stalin who did not believe
Speaker 7: in God, who killed so many people. Enough is enough.
Speaker 7: We're not putting up with it anymore.
Speaker 2: I'll agree with Tatum on one part. I do find
Speaker 2: it weird that Funt says that he likes Stalin. I
Speaker 2: don't understand that. I do wish Tucker had pushed back.
Speaker 2: But the primary contention has been that because Tucker was
Speaker 2: so adversarial with Ted Kruz when he just absolutely eviscerated him,
Speaker 2: which I loved, he should have done this same thing
Speaker 2: with Nick Fuenttes. And I think that the point that
Speaker 2: needs to be made there is that the reason that
Speaker 2: Tucker was so adversarial with Ted Cruz is because in
Speaker 2: that very moment, the topic at hand was the bombing
Speaker 2: of Iran. It was a war that was about to begin.
Speaker 2: It was not a war that happened seventy five years ago.
Speaker 2: So the urgency of challenging Fuenttes on his opinion of
Speaker 2: Stalin wasn't exactly there. Whereas he had a sitting senator
Speaker 2: who had the capacity to actually start that war, talking
Speaker 2: about why we should go to war with Iran, and
Speaker 2: Tucker was saying, no, we're not doing that, and he
Speaker 2: challenged him on a theological basis, and he absolutely eviserted
Speaker 2: him and it was beautiful. So when people want to
Speaker 2: challenge Sucker as to why he didn't push back, I
Speaker 2: think it's because it's a historical discussion that he probably
Speaker 2: didn't want to take the conversation in that direction. So
Speaker 2: it's his show, it's his prerogative. I think had had
Speaker 2: Fontez been talking about, well, let's, I don't know, have
Speaker 2: communism again, you know, let's actually have that happen in
Speaker 2: real time, Tucker had been like, whoa, whoa, whoa, what
Speaker 2: are you talking about? He didn't. He wasn't saying that,
Speaker 2: so he didn't challenge him. One more clip and then
Speaker 2: I'll get to my point here. This is Donald Trump
Speaker 2: at the RJC, which, by the way, all of these
Speaker 2: clips are at the Republican Jewish Coalition. That's what this
Speaker 2: big siop is located from.
Speaker 4: Hello to everyone at the Republican Jewish Coalition, and congratulations
Speaker 4: on forty amazing years. I want to thank your national chairman,
Speaker 4: former Senator Norm Coleman, along with your CEO Matt Brooks
Speaker 4: and my friend Miriam Adelson and so many other incredible supporters,
Speaker 4: distinguished guests. With the help of many of you, we
Speaker 4: won all seven swing states by millions of votes, and
Speaker 4: very importantly, the RJC helped ensure that we won the
Speaker 4: highest percentage of Jewish vote of any Republican since nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty eight. I can't imagine we didn't do better than that,
Speaker 4: after all I've done for the Jewish vote. I must
Speaker 4: be honest with you. But that's okay. Nineteen eighty h
Speaker 4: is not that bad.
Speaker 2: That's really the only part of that speech from Trump
Speaker 2: that I wanted to get to. He's lamenting the fact
Speaker 2: that more Jewish people didn't support him in this election,
Speaker 2: and that's true, only approximately thirty percent did so. Yeah,
Speaker 2: despite the fact that he is the most pro Israel
Speaker 2: president in my lifetime, maybe ever, he is still not
Speaker 2: getting even the majority of support from Jewish voters in America.
Speaker 2: And I think it ought to, I don't know, maybe
Speaker 2: open Trump's eyes and actually open up Mark Levin and
Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro and everybody else's eyes to the fact that
Speaker 2: Jewish people by and large do not support what's happening.
Speaker 2: In fact, most of them don't, so yeah, I don't
Speaker 2: think that they This was actually a point that was
Speaker 2: made by Tucker Carlson two Nick fuent Is in this
Speaker 2: incredibly controversial episode or interview between the two men, and
Speaker 2: I thought that it was the probably most important pushback
Speaker 2: that needs to be made against Nick Fountes. And despite
Speaker 2: the fact that he did so, he's being accused of
Speaker 2: having no pushback to Nick, which is false. This clip
Speaker 2: that I'm about to play you has received zero traction.
Speaker 2: It has been shared by nobody. All of the hit pieces,
Speaker 2: all of the smears, all of the blacklisting attempts and
Speaker 2: defunding attempts, and going after Heritage and going after that.
Speaker 2: This is how crazy it's gotten. They realize that they
Speaker 2: cannot cancel Nick funt Does he's got an independent platform.
Speaker 2: They cannot really cancel Tucker Carlson. He's got an independent platform.
Speaker 2: So what they're doing is they're going after Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 2: which has bought ads on Tucker's show to the tune
Speaker 2: of a good chunk of money. So they're now going
Speaker 2: after Heritage because the CEO of Heritage refused to disavow Tucker,
Speaker 2: and then they recognize that it wasn't enough to just
Speaker 2: get him. They're now going after the guy who works
Speaker 2: for Heritage, who wrote the speech for the CEO of Heritage,
Speaker 2: who refused to condemn, the guy who platformed, the guy
Speaker 2: who didn't push back against the no no guy. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's what we're dealing with. Do you see the similarities
Speaker 2: between the entire past decade of woke cancelation attempts. It's
Speaker 2: so obvious. I mean, we are almost up to six
Speaker 2: full degrees of cancelation. It's no longer Kevin Bacon. It's cancelation.
Speaker 2: That's what they're doing. And that's the exact same thing.
Speaker 2: They go after people's friends. They go after Matt Walsh.
Speaker 2: Why aren't you condemning? They go after Magan Kelly. Why
Speaker 2: aren't you condemning Tucker Carlson? Not because of what Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson said, but because of who Tucker Carlson talk to,
Speaker 2: talk to. I mean, it's nuts. It's the exact same thing.
Speaker 2: It is the woke mind virus. And the reason, as
Speaker 2: I explained in the prior episode, is because it's an
Speaker 2: identitarian worldview. It's actually an ethno nationalist worldview, which is
Speaker 2: ironic because all of the contention against Tucker and Nick
Speaker 2: Foontes is because they accuse Nick of being an ethno nationalist.
Speaker 2: These people are actual nationalists, and I think they just
Speaker 2: don't want competition.
Speaker 8: Not just principle, but like spiritual reality that we have
Speaker 8: to defend, which is God created every person as an individual,
Speaker 8: not as a group. He no woman gave birth to
Speaker 8: a community. Like we hate that kind of thinking. Yes,
Speaker 8: collectivest thinking like that, that's identity politics. That's what Dave
Speaker 8: Rubin engages. And that's why Dave is like a just
Speaker 8: a child. Like you don't pay any attention to Dave
Speaker 8: because he's like shallow. But we're not going to be that,
Speaker 8: right or No. No, I completely agree with you.
Speaker 2: And I gotta be honest with you. I don't think
Speaker 2: this is about Nick Fuentes. I know this is going
Speaker 2: to be controversial. I think this is because Tucker started
Speaker 2: to tell a whole lot of truth, like the truth
Speaker 2: that you're really not allowed to talk about, especially when
Speaker 2: you are the top guy, the top GOP commentator. And
Speaker 2: like it or not, Tucker is and he will continue
Speaker 2: to be that. Tucker started to push back against things
Speaker 2: that you really aren't supposed to. I'll give you a list.
Speaker 2: First off, well, right now now he's arguing that we
Speaker 2: should not be going to war with Venezuela. Many of
Speaker 2: you probably aren't even aware that that's happening. We have
Speaker 2: an entire armada sailing towards Venezuela. We have CIA operations
Speaker 2: that are happening there. It's highly likely that we will
Speaker 2: be at war with Venezuela in the next month. So
Speaker 2: Tucker is speaking out against that. Tucker also spoke out
Speaker 2: and challenged Ted Cruz and tried to prevent the bombing
Speaker 2: of Iran. Tucker has also advocated very strongly against the war,
Speaker 2: the proxy war against Russia and Ukraine. When you advocate
Speaker 2: against the military industrial complex, the neocons, you become public
Speaker 2: enemy number one. And they were just waiting. They were
Speaker 2: biding their time and waiting for their opportunity to bring
Speaker 2: out the knives. When he had the courage to host
Speaker 2: someone like Nick Fuentes, they saw their opportunity and they pounced.
Speaker 2: And this is a well funded, well coordinated operation to
Speaker 2: try and destroy Tucker Carlson. But because he has an
Speaker 2: independent platform, they can't really destroy him. So what are
Speaker 2: they doing. They're going after his allies. They're going after
Speaker 2: his funding sources, they're going after his spon answers, They're
Speaker 2: going after any of his friends in the right wing
Speaker 2: media sphere. That's what's happening. It's crystal clear. Tucker is
Speaker 2: also going after the Epstein file. This is what he
Speaker 2: had to say just a month or so ago.
Speaker 8: So let's just assess us logically, they're covering up the DOJ.
Speaker 8: The current DOJ under Pambondi is covering up crimes, very
Speaker 8: serious crimes by their own description. Why are they doing that? Yeah,
Speaker 8: So they're really only two potential explanations that I can
Speaker 8: think of. Maybe you've got another. The first is that
Speaker 8: Trump is involved, that you know Trump is on the list,
Speaker 8: They've got tape of Trump doing something awful. I don't
Speaker 8: believe that for two reasons. One, I've talked Trump about
Speaker 8: it a lot, and I know him. He's not that,
Speaker 8: you know, for whatever his sins, I don't think he's
Speaker 8: that guy. Actually, I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.
Speaker 8: That's just my view. But moreover, but more I think
Speaker 8: convincing is that this is all information that the Biden
Speaker 8: administration had, and if there was evidence that Trump had
Speaker 8: been involved in illegal sexual activity, you think that people
Speaker 8: who made up Russia Gate wouldn't have read it?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 8: Come on now, So the only other explanation I can
Speaker 8: think of, again, maybe you've got another, is that intel
Speaker 8: services are at the very center of the story US
Speaker 8: and Israeli and they're being protected. I think that seems
Speaker 8: like the most the most obvious. I have a history
Speaker 8: of this.
Speaker 1: There have been multiple documented cases.
Speaker 2: And there is your mortal sin. You cannot, you absolutely
Speaker 2: must not connect the dots between Epstein foreign intel, domestic intel,
Speaker 2: and how compromont is built against our politicians. He touched
Speaker 2: the third rail. He went there. He didn't just go
Speaker 2: there with that either. I already gave you the whole
Speaker 2: list of wars that he's opposed. He has just started
Speaker 2: to tell the truth too much, and most importantly, to
Speaker 2: an audience that is too large. That's his real sin.
Speaker 2: He is too big, he is too honest, and that
Speaker 2: will not be permitted. Therefore, you have a well funded,
Speaker 2: well orchestrated attack mob that is out to destroy Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson and undermine anybody who's affiliated with him, anyone who
Speaker 2: likes him, anyone who supports him financially or otherwise. It
Speaker 2: couldn't be more obvious. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1: We have all witnessed. This is what has been happening
Speaker 1: to Tucker Carlson and Candae Sowens and me for ten years.
Speaker 1: And finally somebody stood up and said, you know what, No,
Speaker 1: we're not going to cancel Tucker Carlson. Fuck you, We're
Speaker 1: not going to cancel Tucker Carlson anytime soon. And even then,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do that and pick you over him. You
Speaker 1: are insane. He stood on business and people said, it's
Speaker 1: about time that someone stood up to the bullying.
Speaker 2: So why do I draw the similarity to what's happening
Speaker 2: to Tucker and to Charlie Kirk. Well, a lot of
Speaker 2: people haven't seen this clip, so I'm gonna play it
Speaker 2: for you. This happened one month after October seventh, and
Speaker 2: this was a question that was asked to him and
Speaker 2: a response that he gave because he challenged the narrative
Speaker 2: over what happened during October seventh, which was obviously not
Speaker 2: to be permitted.
Speaker 9: Fact number one Axios article shows that an equivalent of
Speaker 9: a council of decision makers were briefed on Friday night
Speaker 9: before the attack that there was growing chattern activity on
Speaker 9: the Gaza border and there was a deliberate decision not
Speaker 9: to put it on high alert. The why we don't
Speaker 9: know the what is unmistakable fact number two nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 9: fifty years ago. And I'm not saying this is what happened,
Speaker 9: but you better know about this. Golda Mayir was briefed
Speaker 9: by her military and they said Egypt and Syria are
Speaker 9: about to invade. We can strike now and we can
Speaker 9: save lots of Jewish lives. And she said, do not strike.
Speaker 9: Let them hit first, or else the international community will
Speaker 9: be very, very upset with us. That's fifty years ago
Speaker 9: to the date that Goldenmayer made that decision. The best
Speaker 9: answer and the one that will probably come out, is
Speaker 9: Israel got complacent, probably or one that people are not
Speaker 9: talking about. Maybe Netanyahu is double crossed within his own government,
Speaker 9: maybe that there were not maybe there were spies within
Speaker 9: the spy agency. I am going to continue to ask
Speaker 9: the question a twenty hour response in a country the
Speaker 9: size of New Jersey that that begs a big explanation.
Speaker 9: And more importantly, America is significantly underwriting the Israeli government
Speaker 9: four billion dollars a year. We'se American taxpayers deserve answers
Speaker 9: to this. We deserved answers also if we're going to
Speaker 9: get into a regional or world war based on an
Speaker 9: INTEL failure, So I mean we pay for this. What
Speaker 9: are we buying?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 9: I got smeared as a Jew hater, an anti Semite,
Speaker 9: and conspiracy theorist because I said exactly what I just said,
Speaker 9: and I refuse to back down despite all the smears
Speaker 9: thrown at me, because I learned during COVID. I learned
Speaker 9: when they told us that it came from a bat
Speaker 9: in the Himalayas. I learned when they told us the
Speaker 9: vaccine was safe. In effect, if I learned when they
Speaker 9: told us that iver Mecdam was horse paced, that you
Speaker 9: better keep asking questions because it's the only thing that
Speaker 9: keeps us free.
Speaker 2: Charlie was waking up, That's the truth. Charlie was waking up.
Speaker 2: He wasn't all the way awake, but he started to
Speaker 2: question things that you simply are not allowed to. And
Speaker 2: more importantly, he refused to back down when they started
Speaker 2: the smear attack against him. Here's a good example of that.
Speaker 2: One week after October seventh, during this entire controversy, right
Speaker 2: after Charlie had gone on, Patrick bet David and said
Speaker 2: that he was wondering if there may have been a
Speaker 2: standown order. This is what Ben Domenich said. This is
Speaker 2: the wife of Megan McCain. Sorry I said wife, husband,
Speaker 2: but probably probably goes that way anyways. He says, if
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk remains the head of TPUSA, the right has
Speaker 2: an anti Semite problem that will follow them into the
Speaker 2: coming election. This is my response. One week after October
Speaker 2: seventh said, do you have a better answer as to
Speaker 2: why there was no real military very presence for seven
Speaker 2: hours into the attack? Can you understand why reasonable people
Speaker 2: would find that bizarre without it being a somewhow hateful worldview.
Speaker 2: I stand by that question. I still have that question.
Speaker 2: That question has still not been answered. We still have
Speaker 2: no investigation, We still have no disclosures as to why
Speaker 2: a country the size of New Jersey would allow for
Speaker 2: an attack from a couple hundred jihattis to transpire and
Speaker 2: go without any sort of military response for seven hours
Speaker 2: in a nation that is basically a police state. I mean,
Speaker 2: their borders are probably the most guarded border in the world,
Speaker 2: next to North Korea. How did that happen? Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: asked that question. I can ask that question because I'm
Speaker 2: a small timer. I also don't have any funding sources
Speaker 2: that are tied to foreign nations. I don't have any
Speaker 2: funding sources. Actually, this is a purely me operation. Charlie
Speaker 2: wasn't in that position. Charlie ran TPUSA. Charlie took major
Speaker 2: money from people who have interests in the intel agencies.
Speaker 2: Let's just put it like that. He started to ask
Speaker 2: questions that he is simply not permitted to do in
Speaker 2: the position that he held, and for that reason, the
Speaker 2: attack mobs and the smears and the articles started to
Speaker 2: get written, and they tried to destroy him for two
Speaker 2: straight years. So when Candis Owens talks about the struggle
Speaker 2: session that he received in the Hamptons, if you think
Speaker 2: she's overstating it, you may not have been paying attention
Speaker 2: to what's transpired with Tucker Carlson over the past week
Speaker 2: and really over the past couple months. And it's not
Speaker 2: just Tucker Carlson, It's not just Candis owns. And it
Speaker 2: wasn't just Charlie Kirk. It's also Marjorie Taylor Green, who's
Speaker 2: being attacked viciously this week and has been attacked for
Speaker 2: many months now. It's also Thomas Massey. What are the similarities?
Speaker 2: These people have major differences of opinion when it comes
Speaker 2: to all sorts of issues, But the one tie that
Speaker 2: binds between all of them is that they all sincerely
Speaker 2: mean it when they say America first. They are not
Speaker 2: playing around. They are sincere in that that. Maybe they
Speaker 2: have other areas of dishonesty, but when it comes to
Speaker 2: that particular topic, those are sincere actors in that regard,
Speaker 2: and as a consequence, they are all receiving the same treatment.
Speaker 2: And I have to connect the most uncomfortable dot of all.
Speaker 2: What happened to Charlie Kirk six weeks ago. Well, he
Speaker 2: was assassinated. And I've been crystal clear about this. I
Speaker 2: don't know who killed Charlie Kirk. I don't, but I
Speaker 2: do know this for a fact. There was a motive
Speaker 2: to take him out, and it surrounded a foreign country,
Speaker 2: and all of the clues, all of the real evidence
Speaker 2: of that motive was actively hidden in the wake of
Speaker 2: his assassination by Josh Hammer and others. Basically the entire
Speaker 2: TPUSA organization stayed totally silent on the fact that just
Speaker 2: forty eight hours before his death he said, and I quote,
Speaker 2: I have no choice but to leave the prosial cause.
Speaker 2: That's what he said. And given the attack and smear
Speaker 2: job that was being waged against him for the prior
Speaker 2: two years, do you think he said that lightly or
Speaker 2: was that said with sincerity? And I want to point
Speaker 2: something else out, as Dave Smith has also talked about this,
Speaker 2: does Josh Hammer strike you as a guy who's more
Speaker 2: capable of defending the pro Israel cause or debating college
Speaker 2: kids than Charlie Kirk. Do you think that Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: employed or requested Josh Hammer's advice when it came to
Speaker 2: defending the pro Israel cause or was he assigned him?
Speaker 2: I want you to really think about that, and it's
Speaker 2: an uncomfortable question, but from everything I can see, given
Speaker 2: the fact that Charlie was feeding he was feeding Josh
Speaker 2: Hammer to Dave Smith, Dave Smith had already debated Josh Hammer.
Speaker 2: Dave Smith had already trounced Josh Hammer and Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: said during his penultimate event in July at TPUSA and
Speaker 2: Tampa that I'm going to have Dave Smith debate Josh
Speaker 2: Hammer again. He knew Josh Hammer could win that debate.
Speaker 2: Do you think his donors Do you think the Zionists
Speaker 2: appreciated that fact? Do you think they appreciated the fact
Speaker 2: that he continued to platform someone like Tucker Carlson at
Speaker 2: that same event despite their constant demands that he stopped
Speaker 2: doing so. The answer is no, they didn't appreciate it.
Speaker 2: They took it very personally, and two months later he
Speaker 2: was dead. Those are facts. That doesn't mean that the
Speaker 2: dots connect perfectly. But you have to ask that question.
Speaker 2: You have no choice but to ask it. You would
Speaker 2: be lying to yourself if you don't ask it, if
Speaker 2: you don't connect those dots a little bit, if you
Speaker 2: don't say I see a clear motive, Because there is
Speaker 2: a clear motive. It couldn't be more obvious. And the
Speaker 2: exact same thing that happened to Charlie Kirk in the
Speaker 2: lead up to his assassination is happening to Tucker Carlson
Speaker 2: right now. And it's very important that everybody points it out,
Speaker 2: that everybody tells the truth about what they see happening,
Speaker 2: and they do not permit this to happen again. It
Speaker 2: cannot happen again. We are in a very very dark
Speaker 2: world and a dark future if they do something catastrophic
Speaker 2: to Tucker Carlson. Pray for Tucker Carlson, Speak out for
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson, Call out the syops against Tucker Carlson. I
Speaker 2: don't say any of this lately, but I want you
Speaker 2: guys to really recognize what's happening. Randy Fine, a sitting
Speaker 2: congressman is in Congress almost exclusively because of APEX support
Speaker 2: rjc Apek. Hundreds of thousands of dollars flooded into his coffers.
Speaker 2: That's the whole reason he's in Congress. You have a
Speaker 2: sitting congressman calling Tucker Carlson the most dangerous anti Semite
Speaker 2: in America, not because of what he said, but because
Speaker 2: of who he hosted. Sure, I'm sure that's all it is.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
Speaker 2: that he's challenging the narrative that Israel is our greatest ally.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact
Speaker 2: that Tucker Carlson is calling out the war propagand for
Speaker 2: what it is and trying to put this country first
Speaker 2: for once in my lifetime. I'm sure it has nothing
Speaker 2: to do with the fact that Tucker Carlson is an
Speaker 2: independent voice who's telling the truth too often and to
Speaker 2: too many people right has nothing to do with any
Speaker 2: of those things. It's just that he's the most dangerous
Speaker 2: anti semi in America. You're treating him like Pap Buchanan.
Speaker 2: I see it for what it is. I will not
Speaker 2: allow it. I will not go quietly or silently about it.
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson is a national treasure and he will be
Speaker 2: defended as such. And if you fucking lift a finger
Speaker 2: against Tucker Carlson, you will see a backlash in this
Speaker 2: country the likes of which you have never seen before
Speaker 2: in your lives. Do not fuck with Tucker Carlson. We
Speaker 2: all stand behind him. Randy Fine, a sitting congressman, is
Speaker 2: running a foreign influence operation against the most high profile
Speaker 2: political commentator on the right wing in a Mariera. That
Speaker 2: should be a FARA violation, That should be illegal, actually,
Speaker 2: but it's not. So this is the only defense we
Speaker 2: have to tell the truth about what's happening, to point
Speaker 2: it out to call it out and hope that it
Speaker 2: can diffuse it, because if it doesn't, things could get very,
Speaker 2: very ugly, and I desperately want to avoid that. If
Speaker 2: you guys enjoyed this episode, please do it the like button, subscribe,
Speaker 2: share it around, and I've got the biggest episode of
Speaker 2: my life coming up later this week. I'll just leave
Speaker 2: it at that. I have two men coming on this
Speaker 2: show that are going to be Yeah, I'm going to
Speaker 2: be on the radar. Let's just say, let's just put
Speaker 2: it like that. Talk to you guys soon. Oh and
Speaker 2: if you want to support my work, go to at
Speaker 2: Liberty log pot on X subscribe there. I'll follow you back.
Speaker 2: Or if you don't have any money, to share the
Speaker 2: show around, appreciate you guys.
Speaker 1: Pease you saw an avalanche on the timeline of the
Speaker 1: seven thousand dollars club, the paid shills, as well as
Speaker 1: the two percent, the foreign agents, the fore spot, the
Speaker 1: Israel firsters avalanche on the timeline in the quote tweets,
Speaker 1: and you would think everything I just said was a
Speaker 1: Hitler speech, was a Nazi pamphlet. They said, this is
Speaker 1: another Holocaust. I can't believe it's happening again. This is
Speaker 1: a dark day. I can't believe it's happening this fast.
Speaker 1: They're selling out their principles. What what are you talking about?
Speaker 8: What I do think is bad, just objectively bad and
Speaker 8: destructive is the all Jews are guilty or all anybody
Speaker 8: is guilty of anything, because that's just like not true
Speaker 8: and we don't believe that is Christians. I mean, my
Speaker 8: hero in life is Paul, because you call him Saint Paul.
Speaker 1: Not to be that guy and say that thing, but
Speaker 1: like my best friend is a Jewish person.