Speaker 1: And we are live. Okay, So we are on rumble.
Speaker 1: I just picked kick because I am not allowed to
Speaker 1: go on YouTube for another eight days or so I think.
Speaker 1: I think it's eight days. I don't know. They gave
Speaker 1: me another like it, took down another video, yet another
Speaker 1: one and said, uh yeah, no more extra strikes, but
Speaker 1: this one's gone too. I don't know. I don't know
Speaker 1: what that's all about. But they didn't give me another strike.
Speaker 1: They could have just slapped my channel right down, but
Speaker 1: they didn't, which is very odd in my opinion, especially
Speaker 1: when you'd think that you look for excuses any chance
Speaker 1: they get to do that. So I'm not sure why
Speaker 1: they didn't do it. I'm gonna have my ideas, but
Speaker 1: I don't know why exactly. Nothing confirmed.
Speaker 2: So we have.
Speaker 1: Doctor uh doctor Glynnen coming on tomorrow, all right, So
Speaker 1: that's eleven am Pacific to be twelve pm my time
Speaker 1: now because we stay put when everybody else changes their clocks,
Speaker 1: and he will be not the last gast of the week.
Speaker 1: So on at two o'clock today my time, two pm
Speaker 1: my time, I have Scott Sharrah, So I gotta make
Speaker 1: sure I keep my eye on the clock here and
Speaker 1: I also have you guys aren't seeing what I think
Speaker 1: you're seeing? See see how that works? What there it goes?
Speaker 1: We also where's where is everybody? It was a scheduled stream?
Speaker 1: What are we doing? We double check here we have
Speaker 1: we have Scott Shart coming out too. I'll be on
Speaker 1: with h ouck Man. Why can't I think anything? Why
Speaker 1: can't I think words out? I'll be on with the
Speaker 1: Davis Lherrman on his channel tonight. All right, is this
Speaker 1: working or what his channel? Yeah? All right, so on cool.
Speaker 1: So this is the big part of the chunk of
Speaker 1: story I started yesterday. Good morning to archangel what it is?
Speaker 1: And uh yeah, hopefully that's actually doing what it says
Speaker 1: it's doing. Can never tell that, mofo. Then let's jump
Speaker 1: over here to FDJ and get this guy going. I've
Speaker 1: got long presentations from a couple different video sources today,
Speaker 1: but they're all very cool, very worth the watch. Zero
Speaker 1: one me, what the fuck? How does that make sense?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 1: I gotta test this and make sure it's not Jack Maroon.
Speaker 1: It looks like it's working right, but you can never tell.
Speaker 1: It never stops spinning. This is just trash. Why am
Speaker 1: I here it's like it's like not being somewhere at all.
Speaker 1: All right, whatever, fuck it, I don't care work for
Speaker 1: everybody else except for me.
Speaker 2: I guess.
Speaker 1: Okay, So here we are, we're going to be doing
Speaker 1: a video from Ben Jordan. We're going to be doing
Speaker 1: now that I'm a Margot Daffy one. This one right
Speaker 1: here we is called AI in Our Future Part two.
Speaker 1: Part two is plenty. We don't need to see the
Speaker 1: other stuff. And let's see Lewis Rossman this one right here,
Speaker 1: and if we have time, this one as well. I
Speaker 1: think it's this one. Is it dy one instead a check? Yes? Okay,
Speaker 1: this dude's pretty cool. I just saw I just caught
Speaker 1: him today and this is kind of like the only
Speaker 1: video that's I caught him yesterday, I mean for the
Speaker 1: first time. But this is pretty much only video that's
Speaker 1: relevant to what we're talking about today, and it's very cool.
Speaker 1: But first, let's get in Azie mood. Hey, you ready,
Speaker 1: you ready, let's do this. It'll blast of your ears out.
Speaker 1: Let me know if there's an echo, though, please please
Speaker 1: let me know if there's an echo.
Speaker 4: I think Rota made.
Speaker 5: Rota mad.
Speaker 6: I think.
Speaker 7: Right, all right, you're riding, don't hide?
Speaker 6: What's it.
Speaker 8: Me?
Speaker 1: If you go look?
Speaker 9: It is soon.
Speaker 3: Re s.
Speaker 6: To be my best.
Speaker 2: Gendle space as I don't bring back the shape.
Speaker 10: Of a man. Bolity you on yours.
Speaker 11: Because I'll become bad, bring back the past, numbouts, slave
Speaker 11: fortune it keep speaking.
Speaker 2: To all right?
Speaker 4: All right?
Speaker 1: So that's Mary go bye bye by mister Bungle. And
Speaker 1: that is why I named this message in the Space.
Speaker 1: I did a because that's what he says in the song,
Speaker 1: to be my message in the space as I die. Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're basically all on the brink. That was nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety five, and that was of course, of course you
Speaker 1: knew who that was, right, I hope you do. No,
Speaker 1: all right, Well that was Mike Patton from Faith and More.
Speaker 1: His first band, his school band, was Mister Bungle. He's
Speaker 1: been a billion other bands since then. It's including Mondo
Speaker 1: Kine and all these other ones. Loveage Lovage was a
Speaker 1: good one. It's like all these one album bands. Tomahawk
Speaker 1: was a couple of albums, Peeping Tom was one album.
Speaker 1: General Patten and the Executioners was one album. All kinds
Speaker 1: of stuff, all right, So anyway, it kind of gets
Speaker 1: us in the mindset for what we're about to be
Speaker 1: having to endure and come to terms with. He says,
Speaker 1: I feel I'm walking into suicide. What the hell is
Speaker 1: that noise? Did you hear that? That was weird?
Speaker 7: Oh?
Speaker 1: Maybe it was just touching that it sounds like a fart. Okay,
Speaker 1: So I did. Just to give you another little background,
Speaker 1: I did a song breakdown analysis for college with the
Speaker 1: using this song a couple other ones, and I've never
Speaker 1: seen this happen before. The teacher wrote blasphemous on it,
Speaker 1: like I'm just critiquing this blastmous. Okay, thanks, buddy. I
Speaker 1: can tell we're gonna get along. Uh, let's start with
Speaker 1: this guy here. Uh, this is Lewis Rossman with two
Speaker 1: ends and two s's. Hell, let's do that. He's a
Speaker 1: paper clip guy now. But he keeps on saying his autism.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I believe it. I think people
Speaker 1: just accept labels that they're given. You talk fast, you
Speaker 1: think fast, whatever, you know Asperger's maybe, I don't know.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter, really, I don't buy it. Who the
Speaker 1: hell's who the hells someone else to label me?
Speaker 12: Right?
Speaker 1: Kind of makes sense a little bit though for me.
Speaker 1: I guess I don't know, Aspergers, I don't know.
Speaker 13: Hey everybody, how's it going? Hope you have an all day?
Speaker 13: Welcome today's episode of again you have to hostless Rosman today.
Speaker 13: I want to fowup in a this might be three
Speaker 13: years ago about the Ring.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not. I don't know. It seems awfully sped
Speaker 1: up lay back to be as normal, but he may
Speaker 1: have sped it up in his side, or he just
Speaker 1: talks that fast as on occasion or Bell.
Speaker 13: This is not one of my best videos, but I'm
Speaker 13: just going to discuss the topic before we move on
Speaker 13: to what is going on today. So to give you
Speaker 13: some context here, Senator Ed Marky sent a letter from
Speaker 13: the United States Senate to Ring Doorbell, or to the
Speaker 13: CEO of Amazon, Andy Jasse, but essentially Ring Doorbell, saying
Speaker 13: he wanted to express concerns about Ring's ongoing surveillance practices
Speaker 13: and engage with law enforcement while acknowledge and appreciate the
Speaker 13: steps that Ring has taken in response to my previous
Speaker 13: letters to your company, I are in trouble by your
Speaker 13: company's invasive data collection and problematic engagement with police departments. Now,
Speaker 13: the question that I focused on in the video.
Speaker 1: Idea whoa WHOA whoa ring has already ten million users.
Speaker 1: I just read that on That caught my eye. Over
Speaker 1: ten million users. There's over ten million extra cameras that
Speaker 1: people put on themselves, thinking that they're the only ones
Speaker 1: looking at the footage from their cameras when it's accessible
Speaker 1: to government. Every camera that you have is accessible to
Speaker 1: a force and a source that you have no clue of,
Speaker 1: and their intelligence, and they're not friendly. It's the thing
Speaker 1: that actually is the governing body of this country. While
Speaker 1: the people in the suits play make belief for you,
Speaker 1: and they hate us. They hate us a lot. If
Speaker 1: you want to consider them, I would I still call
Speaker 1: them the Saturn colt because it's more accurate because there's
Speaker 1: all different types of varieties of them working together on
Speaker 1: a common goal. And they don't believe in the eschatology,
Speaker 1: but they know that other people do, and that's why
Speaker 1: they're using that. They're using that to basically what they
Speaker 1: call it, predictive programmed people. Well, it's written here in
Speaker 1: the Revelations, it's written here in this book, it's written
Speaker 1: here in that book, it's written here in the Taurus
Speaker 1: says this and all that, but in reality the Sufi
Speaker 1: slash Jewish, but what fuck that means? Mysticism is what's
Speaker 1: powering the accelerationist idea, the eschatological accelerationism, where God's not
Speaker 1: actually doing it because this isn't really God's will because
Speaker 1: we made this crap up. But if we do it,
Speaker 1: then we can always say this is God working and
Speaker 1: getting us closer to this temple and this final outcome,
Speaker 1: the final showdown where the goyde and that's that we win,
Speaker 1: and we bring in Ai, we bring in our demon
Speaker 1: god Saturn, and uh insert all the dippik into the
Speaker 1: people through injections and putting them into the metaverse. Those
Speaker 1: who survive, and if they're not shot up with oracle
Speaker 1: customized injections, well then we'll take their children away from
Speaker 1: being unfit parents. This is what's happening. Within the next year,
Speaker 1: I guarantee you things will be moving closer to that
Speaker 1: reality than away from it. And we'll go over all
Speaker 1: the reasons why I say that shortly, but ten million
Speaker 1: extra cameras that people people are buying surveillance so that
Speaker 1: they can They don't realize it's probably they Oh, it's protection,
Speaker 1: it's safety. It's this. It's that we don't have one.
Speaker 1: That means nobody else is going to access it when
Speaker 1: we're walking in and out of our house to look
Speaker 1: at us. That also means that they can't take it
Speaker 1: a you know, get an idea of who shows up
Speaker 1: at your house, how often you're home, when you're not
Speaker 1: home there there's so many bad things about that. You
Speaker 1: think it's off. Okay, sure you think it's on, Like
Speaker 1: when you leave the house, why wouldn't it be on?
Speaker 1: Do you see where I'm going with this? I mean,
Speaker 1: as you're walking down the street, not only are the
Speaker 1: li FI led street lights tracking your every movement, but
Speaker 1: so are people's doorbell cams. So we're one one where
Speaker 1: one leaves off, the one picks up, and they can
Speaker 1: they can organize that data with the AI, so it
Speaker 1: looks like one continuous video as you're walking down, like
Speaker 1: a three sixty video. Almost. This is what we're at,
Speaker 1: and we're putting we're installing it ourselves and paying for
Speaker 1: it the whole time, just like we're paying for the
Speaker 1: data center's usage already, and I even up and running it.
Speaker 1: Some of them, a lot of them are, But there's
Speaker 1: a whole lot more coming in and we are literally
Speaker 1: paying for them because they don't have to why because
Speaker 1: they're You can call it a governmental agency, but it's not.
Speaker 1: There's no it's a corporatetocracy in the corporatetocracy, so it
Speaker 1: actually runs us. And what that is at its core
Speaker 1: is that same Saturn cult, and it's comprised of Europeans.
Speaker 1: It's comprised of all kinds of people who either take
Speaker 1: a reduced hand in helping them and assisting them. And
Speaker 1: then there's ones that are deeply embedded, long bloodline in
Speaker 1: the in that cult, high ranking members that probably outrank
Speaker 1: some of the ones that they could consider Jews. This
Speaker 1: is a bigger problem than just OAVE. But yes, they
Speaker 1: are overly represented for sure, as always and everything because
Speaker 1: they're that label is primarily the nittyest, grittiest, and even
Speaker 1: the ones that are not, if they're religious, they're an issue.
Speaker 1: But here's the problem, because they even if they don't
Speaker 1: want to be accelerationists, they still believe in the outcome
Speaker 1: that the Escatola eschatologists allegedly telling them that they wrote
Speaker 1: it made up, that God's going to give them the
Speaker 1: world sometime, but on his own time, and they're like, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: We're going to cause the conditions that make it happen. Well,
Speaker 1: that's a good way to manifest the destiny that you want,
Speaker 1: especially when you're playing God yourself, so you get to
Speaker 1: play both roles. You get to create the conditions, create
Speaker 1: the corruption of the blood as they did in the past,
Speaker 1: and then bring this solution in yourself, which is the
Speaker 1: false presentation of God's hand at work. However, would they
Speaker 1: decide to do that, and then people will be less
Speaker 1: resistant because they think it's something religious that's happening, that
Speaker 1: they believe that it's embedded into their programming, and they
Speaker 1: leave it alone, or they even assist it, like going
Speaker 1: to war for that cause or whatnot, or being completely
Speaker 1: okay with genocide because it's going somewhere more special that's
Speaker 1: more important to them than those people's lives. So here
Speaker 1: we are, and well, some of them are a great
Speaker 1: Many people deserve what's coming, yes, but unfortunately they drag
Speaker 1: the rest of us down with them with their lack
Speaker 1: of resistance to it. When when less people than you
Speaker 1: need are resisting or interfering with your resistance, that's a
Speaker 1: problem there, especially considering there is going to be no
Speaker 1: element of surprise. They've ensured that already. You're not going
Speaker 1: to sneak up at anybody. The fact that crimes occur
Speaker 1: right now is because they want them to. They let them.
Speaker 1: They don't want to reveal how sophisticated they are, and
Speaker 1: they don't honestly care if they put the wrong person
Speaker 1: in jail anyway, that's more negative energy that they're putting
Speaker 1: into this public ritual of theirs. It doesn't matter to them.
Speaker 1: In fact, it's probably better And any time they can
Speaker 1: break up a family for whatever reason, that's that. Why
Speaker 1: do you think they're getting so much money from governmental
Speaker 1: bodies like states are being funded because CPS has quotas.
Speaker 1: They balance their budget by stealing children. And it's going
Speaker 1: to get really, really, really bad when they start forcing
Speaker 1: compliance on pharmaceuticals. You know, they have pills that you
Speaker 1: swallow that have a transmitter in it verified that you're
Speaker 1: taking your fucking drugs that you're not. Do you know
Speaker 1: how in complete opposition and inversion that is to doctor
Speaker 1: Glidden and the true understanding of health that you shouldn't
Speaker 1: be taking drugs to drug your way to health in
Speaker 1: the first place. And you sure as hell. Shouldn't be
Speaker 1: taking injections of their poison. You are the well and
Speaker 1: they're poisoning it. And worse, they're poisoning your children. You've
Speaker 1: lived a while, they haven't. They haven't had enough time
Speaker 1: here to enjoy their lives yet.
Speaker 13: Question seven. Ring has stated it will not share customer
Speaker 13: information with law enforcement apps and can send a warrant
Speaker 13: or an exigen emergency circumstance. Please explain in detail ring
Speaker 13: specific internal policies regarding what constitutes an exigen or emergency
Speaker 13: circumstance And b how many times is Ring shared a
Speaker 13: users' recordings with law enforcement because of an exigener emergency circumstance?
Speaker 13: Now keep in mind here he's not asking how many
Speaker 13: times have you be shared with law enforcement with a
Speaker 13: warrant or a court order or even with the consent
Speaker 13: of the person who own the ring doorbell? How many
Speaker 13: times have you just essentially allowed them to go in
Speaker 13: there and just take those recordings from the user's camera
Speaker 13: and use them as they please. And Amazon's answer to
Speaker 13: that was that they've done that eleven times. And do
Speaker 13: you keep in mind this is from a letter that
Speaker 13: was written leave you know, three years ago over three
Speaker 13: years ago at this point. Now, the reason this is
Speaker 13: concerning to me is because they're not actually asking permission
Speaker 13: from the homeowner when they do this. They're not asking
Speaker 13: for permission from a judge. And while you don't have
Speaker 13: any sort of expectation of privacy when you're walking around
Speaker 13: in the public street, our legal framework for privacy and
Speaker 13: for the Fourth Amendment dates back to pre computer, pre
Speaker 13: security cameras, pre car, pre train horse. If you want
Speaker 13: to stalk somebody back then you had to get on
Speaker 13: the best that you could do is get on your horse,
Speaker 13: and our legal framework has not necessarily come up to
Speaker 13: date to deal with this reality now. Flock is a
Speaker 13: series of cameras that I've been talking but a lot
Speaker 13: in this channels there are aisurveillance cameras that have a
Speaker 13: system where if you want to track a vehicle where
Speaker 13: it's going, Essentially you're combining the worst of chat GPT
Speaker 13: with the worst of having a security camera everywhere, and
Speaker 13: you can use this to track people everywhere that they go.
Speaker 13: If you have a Flock camera that's on the side
Speaker 13: of it tent and you have a town like the
Speaker 13: one I went to last time, Vider, Texas, where in
Speaker 13: order to leave the town and get into the town,
Speaker 13: you're essentially going on it tent. You've created a circumstance
Speaker 13: where fuck you, spam call. You've created a circumstance where
Speaker 13: you can track the coming and going of virtually any residents,
Speaker 13: and it would be fairly simple to track and figure
Speaker 13: out exactly where they have gone. There are people that
Speaker 13: have managed to get access to these systems, that have
Speaker 13: emailed me on the promise of confidentiality, that have been
Speaker 13: able to do some pretty psychotic levels of tracking with it.
Speaker 13: And I'm very happy that these are white headed individuals,
Speaker 13: not black head individuals, because again, and I also genuinely
Speaker 13: do hope that the black headed individuals are not the
Speaker 13: ones getting access to this.
Speaker 1: But to get to the point, rings well, let's just
Speaker 1: say this all right, Okay, So you have groups that
Speaker 1: are and again the Israeli idea like that, oh there Israeli.
Speaker 1: So that's even worse. Well yeah, kind of, because they're
Speaker 1: more open about it. But the whole thing is they
Speaker 1: wouldn't been an Israel or this concept or this arrogance
Speaker 1: or this obnoxious behavior as badly if they didn't already
Speaker 1: own our country. So when you say this is Israeli. Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe we need to make more distinction to this because
Speaker 1: it's our funding, our technology, our resources, are smart people
Speaker 1: creating something for Israel. So is it really Israeli? Because
Speaker 1: they like to take the credit for things and like that.
Speaker 1: They like they had this ego thing about their intellect.
Speaker 1: They don't create shit. If they have a technology, we
Speaker 1: made it, all right, and if they're utilizing it, they're
Speaker 1: still needing us to do everything for them because they
Speaker 1: are part of us. We butded it was a budding
Speaker 1: that came out of America that created Israel. Now, however
Speaker 1: way they funded it, with all their discussing land skichhed
Speaker 1: and all the drug trafficking and all the human trafficking
Speaker 1: and casinos and all that crap, that's inconsequential. That's additional
Speaker 1: money for funding a murder campaign in Palestine. That doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that the American taxpayers didn't pay shit a ton
Speaker 1: into that. It doesn't mean that the American taxpayers well, yeah,
Speaker 1: by a time nineteen thirteen occurred, Bam, later on, not
Speaker 1: too long after that, you were paying taxes and the
Speaker 1: treasury was basically looted and all of the reserves for
Speaker 1: gold were sent off to the Jewish bolsh Bolsheviks to
Speaker 1: go murder a bunch of Russians and then, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: let's siphon more of the wealth out of America and
Speaker 1: get us into a world war, the Great War. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: we're not quite done yet. This Germany thing come an
Speaker 1: issue again. They're getting too nationalistic. They're doing too well
Speaker 1: in our system of you know what, they call it, suppressive,
Speaker 1: an oppressive global domination. We're gonna have to destroy them again.
Speaker 1: Here off you go. None of that would have happened,
Speaker 1: and there wouldn't and there is ending result would have
Speaker 1: been Israel if it wasn't for America at all that time,
Speaker 1: every single time, funding the Soviets when they were failing miserably,
Speaker 1: and more funding them when they almost start themselves out
Speaker 1: because they murdered too many of the Kulaks and the
Speaker 1: freaking and the farmers. And this is only the punishment
Speaker 1: that they received from the Bolshevik Jews was simply because
Speaker 1: they didn't want to farm, even though they were given
Speaker 1: everything for real, for free, including the land, ox and seeds,
Speaker 1: education on how to do it, they just weren't going
Speaker 1: to do it because it's against their they can't stoop
Speaker 1: low enough, too low as to pick up anything and
Speaker 1: do manual labor. That's the attitude that is in embedded
Speaker 1: into them from their religious believes, from the Talmud and
Speaker 1: other sources, so and the Kabala. So if they couldn't
Speaker 1: figure out a way to exploit peasants to do it
Speaker 1: for them, they just simply had a failed crop and
Speaker 1: they went off and it became merchants anyway on the
Speaker 1: sly or they would bitch and moana and in addition
Speaker 1: actually just bitch and moan and complaint like somebody on welfare, pretending,
Speaker 1: you know, crying poverty when they're impoverishing themselves because they're
Speaker 1: a lack of will to do anything to help themselves,
Speaker 1: which is hilarious because they gave that attitude to other
Speaker 1: minorities that they brought over here. They brought over here.
Speaker 1: So you want to call it Israeli technology, you want
Speaker 1: to call it Israeli groups, that's fine. But fog, because
Speaker 1: he's talking about put it into bad hands. Well, fog,
Speaker 1: let's see, that's a mass surveillance police system. And then
Speaker 1: there's flock, which is another one discuss all cameras are
Speaker 1: accessible though there's and we're gonna talk about Shadow Dragon Gideon.
Speaker 1: Gideon is another company that utilizes anything they have carte
Speaker 1: Blanche free Range. They call it Israeli technology there too,
Speaker 1: which is hilarious again because who's talking about what and
Speaker 1: what is the true origin? Is really in what way?
Speaker 1: Because there's Israeli is involved in the process and maybe
Speaker 1: the company is over there instead of here. Who funds
Speaker 1: everything you do? Mostly all right? So Gideon Defense, and
Speaker 1: then there's also the Gideon Infectious disease database tracker, which
Speaker 1: will be used in conjunction with Oracle. There's the Pegasus,
Speaker 1: which is the NGO I'm sorry NSL group, which is
Speaker 1: Nev Shalev and Niv Shalev Omni or or ME Israelly
Speaker 1: Cyber Intelligence CIA Israel Masad Pegasus smartphone technology which will
Speaker 1: also be used for making sure if you sneeze that
Speaker 1: you get injected or a pill. Right, So we're going
Speaker 1: to get into all this, but I just want to
Speaker 1: make it clear that when they when they talk about
Speaker 1: Israeli technology, let's be honest with ourselves, it's Saturn cult
Speaker 1: technology and it's probably the origin was probably here and
Speaker 1: everything's given to them because that's this is our pet
Speaker 1: proxy war maker. Right, America can't always be seen on
Speaker 1: the global stage as having caused all these conflicts out
Speaker 1: of nowhere for no reason other than resource grabbing. They
Speaker 1: have to give the impression to the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people weren't buying it, like Libya
Speaker 1: when they were doing this in the past. When they didn't.
Speaker 1: They also didn't believe in the virus bullshit that they
Speaker 1: were trying. That he even predicted it, Cadafi predicted that
Speaker 1: they do something like COVID. That that's me again, the
Speaker 1: Mike Phart. They use their using Ukraine, anything that they've
Speaker 1: ever funded. So if it's in Africa and there's a
Speaker 1: bunch of people in like in Sudan, for instance, being
Speaker 1: murdered by another group, well who gave that other group machetes, guns,
Speaker 1: whatever they gave him? Who gave them the idea and
Speaker 1: the encouragement to go ahead and do that? Like why
Speaker 1: all of a sudden and Somalia and this and that
Speaker 1: and the other thing. There's always something for the diabolical
Speaker 1: oave merchant motherfucker to gain. But again, remember it's not
Speaker 1: just they might be the driving force in our perception,
Speaker 1: But behind that, I'm going to tell you is still
Speaker 1: the Holy See, the Roman Catholic Empire never died, never ended,
Speaker 1: It just became global and by proxy. So you don't
Speaker 1: have to be outwardly showing that you control everything if
Speaker 1: you have your oive pop property managers controlling everything that
Speaker 1: is perceived as government in every country. So they own China.
Speaker 1: They've owned China since Maao just because there's a bunch
Speaker 1: of Asian people and they're look at what they do
Speaker 1: to the people. Do you think Asian people want to
Speaker 1: do Do you think Chinese people want to do that
Speaker 1: to other Chinese people? Do you think that's really their goal?
Speaker 1: Or do you think there's something more diabolical that's anti
Speaker 1: and hateful toward that entire ethnicity controlling them?
Speaker 8: Right?
Speaker 1: You think Mao was the last leader that was groomed.
Speaker 1: And there's such a large country with so many uh
Speaker 1: Man the poison of the of the Jewish mind also
Speaker 1: over the over, the saturn ocult mind has destroyed the
Speaker 1: credibility and the integrity of a great many Chinamen. You
Speaker 1: go to China, you get can you imagine you're in China?
Speaker 1: What fuck else does rice come from? Rice patties, rice
Speaker 1: yessides Vietnam, I guess. But they will sell you on
Speaker 1: the street vendor level of food maybe even in the
Speaker 1: restaurants synthetic rice to basically cut it. They're cutting it
Speaker 1: with fake rice, which is sometimes plastic, sometimes poisonous. People
Speaker 1: have died. People have gone to China for like I
Speaker 1: don't know, Beijing or whatever for a hot to day
Speaker 1: have died from the street food because it was highly toxic,
Speaker 1: like types of plastic that were heated up and steamed
Speaker 1: so that I don't know if it's BPE whatever, fuck
Speaker 1: it is the stuff that comes out of this stuff
Speaker 1: that off gassing. But it killed people. It killed people
Speaker 1: because there are too cheap just to give you a
Speaker 1: rice that you paid for. What the hell it is?
Speaker 13: Now expanding their requests to additional community safety partners, and
Speaker 13: who is the additional community safety partner?
Speaker 2: Flock rings.
Speaker 1: Earlier right here, let's talk about flock for a second.
Speaker 10: I got it right here.
Speaker 1: I think where the fluck is it? Oh yeah, there's
Speaker 1: also scinary scan airy like a scinary in the coal mine.
Speaker 1: That's also Gideon uh with the flock police and store
Speaker 1: surveillance doing a handshake So from the time you leave
Speaker 1: the parking lot of Walmart with all their cameras to
Speaker 1: the time you get into your car and you're driving
Speaker 1: down the road and all of the street lights and
Speaker 1: all of the cameras on every you know, intersection and
Speaker 1: all that. There's more than just that. Now they're tracking you,
Speaker 1: play identification, all kinds of stuff. And that's where adding
Speaker 1: your your ring to that or some other brand, that's
Speaker 1: just the brand ring. There's other people that make these doorbells, cameras.
Speaker 1: They have access to all of it. They wouldn't create
Speaker 1: it if they didn't have access to it. Everything on
Speaker 1: the Internet has a backdoor that the intelligence can get to.
Speaker 1: The VPNs are actually created by quote unquote and remember,
Speaker 1: let's get back to reality. Here Israeli companies. It's the
Speaker 1: same entity as here. Though we gotta we gotta keep
Speaker 1: I want to keep emphasizing that so that we don't
Speaker 1: continue to think that this is a problem that's over there,
Speaker 1: or that these people are rogue or they're on their
Speaker 1: own and they're they're independently doing No, they're doing exactly
Speaker 1: what this entity that's hiding behind people like Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and shit like that, not really hiding behind them, but
Speaker 1: using them as the man out in front, the boy
Speaker 1: in front, he's not even a boy. That is their bidding.
Speaker 1: Whatever is happening in Israel, whatever truly controls America, wants
Speaker 1: that to happen because as they do these antagonistic wars
Speaker 1: by proxy, just like I was saying with you know,
Speaker 1: they're going to fund one group of people that already
Speaker 1: doesn't like another group in some part of the world.
Speaker 1: Lots of times that happens in Africa. They'll give them
Speaker 1: a bunch of weapons, they'll sell them a bunch of weapons.
Speaker 1: They'll just hand them a bunch of weapons, say now,
Speaker 1: go kill those people, and then they will. And then
Speaker 1: a couple of years later America goes in and wipes
Speaker 1: them out. Sometimes and then there's nobody there. Oh look
Speaker 1: there's diamonds in the ground. Oh look there's this resource
Speaker 1: in the ground.
Speaker 8: Gee.
Speaker 1: This is a scam from start to finish. We weren't
Speaker 1: technically in that war, and yeah no, but you were
Speaker 1: selling arms to them, right, they had gold or they
Speaker 1: had something else that and you gave them the ability
Speaker 1: to acquire or control the wealth of that nation so
Speaker 1: that they could buy the weapons. So they could kill
Speaker 1: their enemy, so you could go kill them later or
Speaker 1: leave it be because they've already decided to sell out
Speaker 1: their own people anyway, so it doesn't matter. You don't
Speaker 1: have to technically control them or or put them down,
Speaker 1: and you can just do business with them at that point.
Speaker 1: And the one element that's always common with all this
Speaker 1: stuff is child trafficking, human trafficking in general, drugs oive industries.
Speaker 13: This year, we told you about Community Requests, a feature
Speaker 13: that enables customers to respond requests for help from local
Speaker 13: public safety agencies. In the United States, local public safety
Speaker 13: agencies rely on various tools to manage evidence and conduct investigations.
Speaker 13: At RING, we are committed to expanding access to Community
Speaker 13: Requests certified tools used by these agencies. Today, we're excited
Speaker 13: to announce the expansion of community Requests the local public
Speaker 13: safety agencies using flock Safety Nova Platform or flock OS.
Speaker 13: We plan and inflent imflegrations with other established providers in
Speaker 13: the future. We are committed in our mission of making
Speaker 13: neighbors safer, and we believe an important aspect of that
Speaker 13: is empowering our communities to play a role in low
Speaker 13: public safety. The expansion of community requests will empower more
Speaker 13: communities to do what they've always wanted to do.
Speaker 2: Help you. Flock Nova and flock os is.
Speaker 13: Secure platforms designed to assist public safety agencies in their
Speaker 13: evidence collection and investigative work.
Speaker 1: When local publics is that, they don't say surveillance and
Speaker 1: police state tyranny despotism nineteen eighty four. They say safety,
Speaker 1: public safety agencies. It's all in the cryptic language. Oh wow,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna feel whole lot safer when I can't fart
Speaker 1: without a police officer knowing it. That's great, thanks, especially
Speaker 1: when there are a bunch of pricks who don't respect
Speaker 1: the already long dead Bill of rights that protect your
Speaker 1: natural born natural law rights. It down to endowed by
Speaker 1: the fact that you exist. You have the right to
Speaker 1: defend and protect your life. You have the right to
Speaker 1: say with that hell you want, You can stink whatever
Speaker 1: you want, and if you what the hell, you can
Speaker 1: have your own opinions of things and speak and express
Speaker 1: them in a world that's not so goddamn paranoid and
Speaker 1: anxious and jealous and envious of everything. The psychiotic, schizophrenic
Speaker 1: minds inbred mines. You know who I'm describing right now,
Speaker 1: this cult. They wouldn't be an issue with people speaking
Speaker 1: their minds because everybody would be doing it. So why
Speaker 1: is it? Why are these why is one group so
Speaker 1: fucking sensitive? And why do they create the conditions for
Speaker 1: people to accept that somebody can be that sensitive. Wouldn't
Speaker 1: it be better to shun that type of sensitivity so
Speaker 1: that people just sucked it up and got on with
Speaker 1: their lives. They would have no effect. But they want
Speaker 1: to be victims because there's there's leverage in that, there's
Speaker 1: manipulation in that they have to constantly remind people with
Speaker 1: victims they are all they're murdering other people.
Speaker 13: The agency is using one of the systems have been
Speaker 13: a community request, they'll follow the same established guardrails. They
Speaker 13: must inclue a specific location and time frame of the incident,
Speaker 13: a unique investigation code, and details about who was being investigation. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 13: let's talk a little bit about those. So in Houston,
Speaker 13: when they were doing probes of the FLOCK system, they
Speaker 13: found that these guardrails, these standards, all of this stuff.
Speaker 13: Here's what they were actually inserting when they were using it.
Speaker 13: They were using this x AI powers, a vraillance system
Speaker 13: like a search engine. A lot of searches also showed
Speaker 13: gibberish like ASDF that's the sequence of letters in the
Speaker 13: center of your computer keyboard, or just said that they
Speaker 13: were there for random checks. We even found a search
Speaker 13: that just said donut or that didn't say anything at all.
Speaker 13: So when we talk about these types of AI powers
Speaker 13: a veillance cameras, people will say, well, Louis, you use
Speaker 13: frigate in front of your house, right, I mean, doesn't
Speaker 13: frigate use AI? And it's like, bitch, that ain't the same, don't.
Speaker 13: I'm actually me, you pedantic fuck. I have a camera
Speaker 13: system that it's called the CCTV system closed circuit television,
Speaker 13: closed meaning nobody else gets access to it. That system
Speaker 13: is essentially in my house and that's it. It points
Speaker 13: in my coipond, my driveway, the side of my house.
Speaker 1: Here's the funny thing about that. If it's wireless, No
Speaker 1: it doesn't, because this technology is built with chips and
Speaker 1: sensors and transmitters and receivers that you don't know about.
Speaker 1: You think it's close circuit, but there's no secrets with
Speaker 1: the government. There's no secrets with big brother. Big brother
Speaker 1: who wears a small hat.
Speaker 13: The back of my house, my front door, and that's it.
Speaker 13: I get to see if somebody came by and tried
Speaker 13: to take something from my house or break in.
Speaker 2: I'm the only one with access to it. It is
Speaker 2: not used to track people. The footage is deleted after
Speaker 2: one day.
Speaker 13: That is very fucking different than having thousands, tens of
Speaker 13: thousands of cameras across the country that can be logged
Speaker 13: into from a single location that you can then use
Speaker 13: text like prompts like you're using chat ept. Hey chatchpt,
Speaker 13: what was the weather like on this day? Hey chatchpt?
Speaker 13: Where do people that look like this tend to congregate?
Speaker 13: Hey chatchpt look through these ten thousand cameras and give
Speaker 13: me the details in these individuals. That's a different thing.
Speaker 13: And when you're adding all these cameras into it, it
Speaker 13: just gets creepy. And I really here, here's the thing
Speaker 13: with Right to Repair. The biggest fit that I have
Speaker 13: is that I didn't really get involved until it was
Speaker 13: too late. I didn't think of it as a thing
Speaker 13: until twenty fourteen or twenty fifteen, truly. I mean I
Speaker 13: understood the issues, but I never actually thought, oh, let
Speaker 13: me make a video on, let me talk about it publicly,
Speaker 13: let me actually ask why things are the way they are,
Speaker 13: and then by the time I did, it's too late.
Speaker 13: I hate saying it, but we've got a lot of
Speaker 13: right to repair bills passed. Is it easier for you
Speaker 13: to fix mac with motherboards? Is it easier for you
Speaker 13: to fix anything? I mean, people in the automotive industry
Speaker 13: are talking about how much harder it's getting all the time.
Speaker 13: You have advertisements going up saying that you're giving the
Speaker 13: keys a way to Russia and Iran and China if
Speaker 13: you let people get access to basic tools to be
Speaker 13: able to fix what they own, and a bunch of
Speaker 13: different industries. It's getting more difficult to do repairs because
Speaker 13: we started speaking up far too late into the process,
Speaker 13: and as a result of it. While I'm glad that
Speaker 13: I've raised awareness on these issues.
Speaker 1: So planned ops the lessons and write to repair work
Speaker 1: canned in hands. You can see why that would be
Speaker 1: a handshake in and of itself.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 13: Well, I'm glad that there's a new generation of engineers
Speaker 13: that's say I don't want to.
Speaker 1: And they over complicate car building are now so ridiculous.
Speaker 1: When I had an ould sixty five Mercedes. I could
Speaker 1: work on it, and I'm not a mechanic. I could
Speaker 1: make things happen. One time I had to put the
Speaker 1: throttle back on, and yeah, it was very simple. It
Speaker 1: was very simple when you got down and looked at it.
Speaker 1: There's lots of empty space in there. Now if you
Speaker 1: try to look at them, they have proprietary every goddamn fluid,
Speaker 1: proprietary everything in there, and it's just a mess of
Speaker 1: Like how that there's Mercedes certified people for a reason
Speaker 1: because it's a goddamn Rubik's cube. Worse, I could probably
Speaker 1: solve a Rubus cube. Those things, they just make them impossible.
Speaker 1: And then it's like, oh yeah, the engineers were so
Speaker 1: brilliant they said there's a three dollar part that would
Speaker 1: ever be There would never be a three dollar part.
Speaker 1: I'm Mercedes. I'm just using this as an example. And
Speaker 1: the only thing you have to do in order to
Speaker 1: get to it is to remove the engine and drop
Speaker 1: the transmissi and then crawl inside this little tiny space
Speaker 1: that's about the size of that, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: It's like and oh yeah, by the way, it goes
Speaker 1: out a lot. This is the type of shit that
Speaker 1: they do. Now It's like, why do I have to
Speaker 1: tear apart and then have to try to remember how
Speaker 1: to put it all back together, which makes it prohibitive
Speaker 1: of for me to go just go. I have my
Speaker 1: spark plugs. I also have a van with a doghouse,
Speaker 1: and they're you know, the number one is the one
Speaker 1: that's the number one in the in the cylinders that
Speaker 1: one of the are is misfiring. I can't just go
Speaker 1: in there. And then also I have to try to
Speaker 1: figure out through like you know, meter testing, is it
Speaker 1: going to be the coil too, because that's another three
Speaker 1: hundred dollars for a whole coil pack, like a whole
Speaker 1: pack of the coils for the for the eight cylinders.
Speaker 1: And then is it also a fuel injector issue? So
Speaker 1: it's like, fuck no, I'm gonna end up spending five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars just to have somebody God didn't look at
Speaker 1: it now and uh yeah, I already spent the eighty
Speaker 1: bucks on the or whatever it was on the uh
Speaker 1: on the spark plugs. But I'm still holding on to
Speaker 1: them because it's like I'm not going to start the
Speaker 1: process if I'm gonna have to get somebody else to
Speaker 1: do the other part anyway I might. I was like,
Speaker 1: just have them do the whole thing, you know. I
Speaker 1: was really happy when the O two sensors are just
Speaker 1: right there, and I was like, boom boom, whoa somebody
Speaker 1: wanted to charge me two hundred dollars to do that.
Speaker 1: That's retarded because it was like literally less than five minutes.
Speaker 1: I did pull and it was right there. I just
Speaker 1: pulled a dog hoss off and I was there and
Speaker 1: I was like, dincdnkdink think I had. I got the
Speaker 1: special tool for taking off the O two sensory because
Speaker 1: it has a chord on it, so there's a little
Speaker 1: slot in this thing. Paid eight nine dollars for that
Speaker 1: for that tool. It's like a little like socket thing
Speaker 1: all right for your for your ratchet, but it has
Speaker 1: has a slot in it, like a cut down the
Speaker 1: middle of it so the wire can get in there
Speaker 1: and you can still turn in all that. It was
Speaker 1: super easy. Then I was like I got all confident.
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh yeah, shit, I'm gonna do my breaks next.
Speaker 1: And then I did. I didn't do it. I did
Speaker 1: all loubing electrap and all the winderfle stuff but I didn't.
Speaker 1: I didn't do like rotors. I just did the brake pads,
Speaker 1: and then I'm like, okay, well that's the simple stuff.
Speaker 1: What next? Like an oil change, I just really I
Speaker 1: learned that it's probably about the same amount of money
Speaker 1: for me to do my own oil change as it
Speaker 1: would be to have someone else do it. So if
Speaker 1: I'm gonna build bind and they're gonna also do checks
Speaker 1: like my rear differential and stuff like that while they're
Speaker 1: doing it, I mean as well just go to them
Speaker 1: and have to do it. Not that I can't do
Speaker 1: it something I didn't do it a thousand times in
Speaker 1: my own driveway, but if I can get a couple
Speaker 1: extra things looked at for basically the same amount of money,
Speaker 1: maybe ten hours more, fuck.
Speaker 4: It, you know.
Speaker 1: But when it comes to getting into things, I don't
Speaker 1: even the mass airflow sensor might be part of the
Speaker 1: problem that I'm losing, you know though, whatever it is,
Speaker 1: it's too rich or whatever. And also it's acting funny
Speaker 1: and I'm not getting a lot of power out of
Speaker 1: it anymore. But you have to remove that to get
Speaker 1: to in all kinds of other things. The whole snorkele
Speaker 1: w All us tons of shit and move it away
Speaker 1: and tag it. And it's not that's not for me.
Speaker 1: That's anxiety for me. I mean, maybe I would do
Speaker 1: it if I had, like somebody else holding a camera
Speaker 1: while I was doing it and documenting it so I
Speaker 1: could play it back and figure out how to put
Speaker 1: things where everything else went. But you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know. They just make it more complicated than
Speaker 1: it needs to be. And I don't even have a
Speaker 1: computer that I mean, I could be a vehicle that
Speaker 1: has a shit ton of sensors and computers on it.
Speaker 7: That is.
Speaker 1: Around two thousand and five, they got invasive with that
Speaker 1: so that they were counterintuitive the way they were being built,
Speaker 1: and much more easier for them to shut off if
Speaker 1: they wanted to. And now you remember when everybody was
Speaker 1: still experiencing the repercussions that COVID, and then all the
Speaker 1: dealerships were kind of starting to get empty because they
Speaker 1: weren't getting another influx. So a lot of dealerships around
Speaker 1: here were like that. And and in San Diego, these
Speaker 1: are the places I was at specifically where I could
Speaker 1: identify it by driving by them and seeing it for myself.
Speaker 1: The lots were almost empty much much less much much
Speaker 1: less fold than you would you would uh expect to
Speaker 1: see at a dealership. And the reason was is that
Speaker 1: through their new specs and like this is only a
Speaker 1: diabolical asshole mind would would do this and force this
Speaker 1: upon people who are fake faking the freaking climate change
Speaker 1: bullshit would force this to happen. And people who want
Speaker 1: to stop your vehicle from going past your geo fencing
Speaker 1: kilgrid where they shut off your funding so you can't
Speaker 1: eat or perch anything if you decide to go outside
Speaker 1: of your digital fence and your car stops working at
Speaker 1: that moment. There's a kill switch in your vehicles now,
Speaker 1: and they wouldn't even let them on the lot until
Speaker 1: they all have this kill switch installed. So all the
Speaker 1: new vehicles ever since I don't know, was it twenty three,
Speaker 1: twenty four, they have kill switches in them. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if it's an electric car not, Like the only
Speaker 1: benefit of not having an electric car besides the fact
Speaker 1: that it's absolutely retarded, especially energy bills are going up
Speaker 1: because you're paying for data centers. Great idea, A good
Speaker 1: time to have a freaking electric car. The only upside
Speaker 1: really of having a brand new car that's gas powered.
Speaker 1: Is that unlike the electric car, there's less of a
Speaker 1: chance of it locking you inside and then forcing the
Speaker 1: battery to over excite by shorting itself so that it
Speaker 1: blows up or bursts into flames and kills you and
Speaker 1: roasts you inside, like that cyber truck did with that
Speaker 1: dude who probably killed himself, shot himself in the head
Speaker 1: so you didn't have to burn to death. I'm thinking
Speaker 1: that that happened from a remote from a remote usage,
Speaker 1: you know, or they threw a different carcass in there
Speaker 1: and throw some fireworks in there. I don't know what
Speaker 1: happened there, but you remember what I'm talking about. These
Speaker 1: have these vehicles have been known to override people hitting
Speaker 1: the brake driving, and they've done this to people in
Speaker 1: China because you know, they love they love killing Chinaman China.
Speaker 1: Chinese people who are in charge don't seem to have
Speaker 1: a problem with this, and they would be speeding crazily,
Speaker 1: unable to control their vehicle, and they would crash into
Speaker 1: like people pushing carts around their own to kill those people.
Speaker 1: And then eventually they'd hit something solid enough to stop
Speaker 1: the vehicle and killed the people inside. So that's happened.
Speaker 1: Vehicles have jerked to one side or the other to
Speaker 1: hit something and kill the person. They've driven into the
Speaker 1: walls at high speed. They've locked up and just froze
Speaker 1: up on purpose so that people were locked inside. Now
Speaker 1: imagine you're driven off of a bridge and then you're
Speaker 1: locked in. What a wonderful, suffocating, claustrophobic faith that would be. Plus, Oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, you have a lithium battery, so it's
Speaker 1: probably gonna blow up while you're underground, underwater too and
Speaker 1: make a nice big bubble.
Speaker 13: Products that are the type of shit that Lewis couldn't
Speaker 13: have fixed on this channel back in the day when
Speaker 13: I was watching his channel and being inspired to become
Speaker 13: an engineer, I also realized that, like I kind of
Speaker 13: started talking about a little too late, I did everything
Speaker 13: I could, but I feel like I failed everybody. And
Speaker 13: the thing with this issue is you can't really afford
Speaker 13: to fail here because at least it was right to
Speaker 13: repair stuff. There's the opportunity for businesses, for new companies
Speaker 13: to come out, for new paradise to come out. And
Speaker 13: when those new paradigms come out and those new companies
Speaker 13: come out, for them to have different behavior. But I
Speaker 13: don't see that here. Once that type of surveillance system
Speaker 13: is put up, you're not getting it taken down.
Speaker 1: Right, and there's less incentive to pretend to play nice
Speaker 1: with us anymore. The more control they have over you.
Speaker 1: Let's put this way, unless think about the nature of
Speaker 1: a person, what they would have to be internally in
Speaker 1: order for this scenario to work out. They're six foot
Speaker 1: eight two and ninety pounds or three hundred pounds solid muscle,
Speaker 1: you're five foot five. How does that friendship work when
Speaker 1: you feel like they're impinging upon your ability to enjoy
Speaker 1: your life. Well, they would have to be kind and
Speaker 1: empathetic to even give a shit what you think, because
Speaker 1: there's such a very there's such a difference here. And
Speaker 1: then add to the fact that they have an arsenal
Speaker 1: that's far exceeding any technological thing device you could possibly
Speaker 1: have in order to fight back against them. This isn't
Speaker 1: just David and Goliath. Like again, that was a stupid
Speaker 1: story and that that was inverted as hell. But I
Speaker 1: don't think Caliath is a bad guy as what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I think there was something else going on in the
Speaker 1: whole story, and it's a grimmore. But anyway, now, if
Speaker 1: a government that hates you and wants you to die,
Speaker 1: and considers you an enemy and wants all the goid
Speaker 1: to die, has more surveillance on, you could easily snap
Speaker 1: their fingers because they're the ones who are the justice
Speaker 1: system too, And have you killed at any given time,
Speaker 1: or have you poisoned? And they probably already have people
Speaker 1: in your neighborhood who are just like lifetime actors who
Speaker 1: will just win his time. They will execute literally sometimes
Speaker 1: people and it would just be as simple as here's
Speaker 1: some cookies, or hey, Bob, you want on a beer?
Speaker 1: Poison anything like that. They have all that capacity to
Speaker 1: do this to you, why would they consider your demands
Speaker 1: or your requests. They might look at you and quietly
Speaker 1: be plotting your death while they half smile at you
Speaker 1: and pat your head and tell you okay, sure thing, buddy,
Speaker 1: And then next thing, you know, you walk away pretty confident, thinking, man,
Speaker 1: that's got What a great guy, What a great guy.
Speaker 1: And then and then and then you get you know,
Speaker 1: I'm sure I'm sure Charlie Kurtz thought the same thing.
Speaker 1: Ah a great guy, What a bunch of great, guys,
Speaker 1: I had them all wrong, but you know what I mean. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's no incentive for them to scale anything back if
Speaker 1: they have the controls in place. This is why they
Speaker 1: don't want to take orders from the people anymore, or
Speaker 1: they don't want to even consider our our wants and
Speaker 1: needs for our famili's protection, because that is exactly against
Speaker 1: their plan. Their plan is to strip families up from
Speaker 1: children from their parents, and they're going to utilize the
Speaker 1: medical establishment and these mandatory whatever the fuck's through ai
Speaker 1: an Ai pharmaceutical and you know, medical care that you're
Speaker 1: not gonna be able to say no to. You're not
Speaker 1: gonna be able to have an opinion or opt out
Speaker 1: to you because they'll just shut down your ability to
Speaker 1: feed your family if you do. Oh no, you're not
Speaker 1: going to comply. Well, that's funny, because I thought you'd
Speaker 1: like to eat food. Oh well, I thought you'd like
Speaker 1: to drive your vehicle to the slave job that you have.
Speaker 1: Thought you'd like to get groceries or supplies for your
Speaker 1: small business, which you won't be allowed to have in
Speaker 1: the future either, And uh, you won't be able to
Speaker 1: live outside of us. The little sardine can in the
Speaker 1: sky either very soon, because the data centers will be
Speaker 1: acquiring the goddamn lion's share of water and electricity, and
Speaker 1: that thing is the source of their power, because that's
Speaker 1: what runs all the other things. So we will have
Speaker 1: failed if we let them up, because they already have
Speaker 1: all the other little gadgets that are going to be
Speaker 1: part of their their tentacles already up everywhere. They're already there,
Speaker 1: and people are buying more every day and setting them
Speaker 1: up so they have more surveillance, more more audio and
Speaker 1: visual on everybody. It's not that it's not gonna be
Speaker 1: hard for them to send out drones, if they even
Speaker 1: need to do it that way, they might. That might
Speaker 1: be old school by this that by this point. But
Speaker 1: if again, if all these tunnels, which we know are
Speaker 1: factual that can basically run a semi truck one way
Speaker 1: and the other way underground, and that's just for the
Speaker 1: tunnel part of it, what type of underground territories do
Speaker 1: they have, and what type of troop movements are going
Speaker 1: on underground that we don't see. We see what's on top,
Speaker 1: and we see what they're pretending to do, but they're
Speaker 1: just getting staged. And the fact that they're already up there,
Speaker 1: tells me that this is going to happen soon. You're
Speaker 1: gonna get switched over to digital currency. Soon, there's going
Speaker 1: to be a digital ID or you're out. You're out
Speaker 1: have fun being a hermit, and you're not gonna be
Speaker 1: able to kill the rabbit or the deer to eat
Speaker 1: it because they've already poisoned them too. You're gonna eat
Speaker 1: zombie deer and die anyway, become allergic to meat or
Speaker 1: some shit. This is where we're going, man, this is
Speaker 1: where we're.
Speaker 13: Going, which is why I think it's important to speak
Speaker 13: out against us and push back against this as soon
Speaker 13: as evenly possible. You're going to see and you're gonna
Speaker 13: notice that. I'm going to be traveling a lot in
Speaker 13: the near future. I'm going to be showing up to
Speaker 13: local city council meetings. I'm going to be trying to
Speaker 13: organize people to show up to the city council meetings
Speaker 13: as often as possible, and I'm going to try and
Speaker 13: organize people all around the country to say fuck this
Speaker 13: shit and get this out of here. Because I'm hoping
Speaker 13: that even though I've realized this is an issue a
Speaker 13: little bit too late that it's not like right to repair,
Speaker 13: where it's too late to actually make genuine, real progress
Speaker 13: and get things improved for the better. I am hoping
Speaker 13: that there is a chance of pushing back against this
Speaker 13: in an organized way. I have a Zili channel all
Speaker 13: link to it down below. We have hundreds of people
Speaker 13: working in that channel, dozens of developers that are actually
Speaker 13: working on a website. And what the website's going to
Speaker 13: do is it's going to allow you to put in
Speaker 13: a ZIP code in an email if you want notifications
Speaker 13: and it will tight.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but let's see if anything else, it's.
Speaker 13: Cameras that literally track and log everywhere that I fucking go,
Speaker 13: aipower surveillance cameras that literally track and log everywhere that
Speaker 13: I fucking go. And yeah, most people have no idea.
Speaker 13: So the first thing is creating awareness for it. So
Speaker 13: we have a lot of developers working on that. I'm
Speaker 13: speaking with a company called Curate Solutions that has this
Speaker 13: really interesting scraping tool that shows you what's going on
Speaker 13: in over twelve thousand municipal governments all around the country.
Speaker 13: They have an API access, which again is we're talking
Speaker 13: in like the tens of thousands of dollars for this
Speaker 13: that I'm gonna be pay out of pocket. But again,
Speaker 13: I do not have time to start a nonprofit for this.
Speaker 13: I do not have time to try to raise money
Speaker 13: for this. Like, if it's not done now, I'm gonna
Speaker 13: have a camera shoved up my ass every where I
Speaker 13: go for the rest of my life, and that's unacceptable.
Speaker 13: I am gonna be using that because I want to
Speaker 13: not miss a single fucking one. This zillip room is
Speaker 13: going to be organized where there's a room for every
Speaker 13: single local government. So if you want to speak about
Speaker 13: and get notifications about what's going on in your area,
Speaker 13: you can. If you want to speak in the general
Speaker 13: chat you don't really feel like getting notifications for what's
Speaker 13: going on in New York City or customer North Dakota,
Speaker 13: then you can turn off noticifications for those channels. And
Speaker 13: I am going to try and encourage as many people
Speaker 13: as possible to push back against this.
Speaker 1: Also, we are doing now those all notebooks or you know,
Speaker 1: laptops right there. It looks like I'm looking at Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think he's fixing or refurbishing all these These look
Speaker 1: like all laptops. Those look like the USB boards and
Speaker 1: the headphones and all that stuff.
Speaker 13: Listen, meet up at seven thirty in Austin, Texas. If
Speaker 13: anybody wants to come by, We do it every Friday,
Speaker 13: seven thirty. Anybody is welcome to come by to Luster
Speaker 13: Pearl East.
Speaker 2: I will include a.
Speaker 13: Maps link down below. I hope I remember you because
Speaker 13: I'm actually kind of running out of time today with
Speaker 13: all the stuff I have to do, especially with Edding's video,
Speaker 13: which I probably one head.
Speaker 2: We'll just leave the rambling in anyway.
Speaker 13: Anyway, that's it for today, and as always, hope you
Speaker 13: learn something, do me a favor, help me push back
Speaker 13: against all the.
Speaker 1: There you go.
Speaker 4: So this is.
Speaker 1: Lewis Rossman. I know the name sounds like but this
Speaker 1: sounds pretty interesting.
Speaker 14: Let's see.
Speaker 1: And he has a black cat like me. I have
Speaker 1: two black cats. There's a couple other in here that
Speaker 1: are really interesting. There is the one with the the
Speaker 1: what's it called the the digital what's it called?
Speaker 12: Dr?
Speaker 1: It alters books and book covers, removes books from your
Speaker 1: Kindle library or can change them. Yeah, that's a digital
Speaker 1: rights management? Is that nice? Is that nice of the
Speaker 1: They can alter history by doing that. Aren't you excited
Speaker 1: that that's a thing? I'm sure you are. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: can get rid of that. Okay, well we got ten
Speaker 1: o eight. We got to get through this. This is
Speaker 1: good though, this guy's good man. Maybe they you know,
Speaker 1: let's go with this one.
Speaker 2: If you're an American, you've been probably seeing a whole
Speaker 2: bunch of these things, and in some places they're so
Speaker 2: common that you don't even notice them. They just blended
Speaker 2: into the background like they're trees or street lights. And
Speaker 2: you've probably correctly assumed that they're recording traffic. They're also
Speaker 2: recording and logging license plates and using AI image recognition.
Speaker 2: But what if I told you that they are in
Speaker 2: fact not owned by your local police department or your
Speaker 2: local government, but are licensed to them by a third
Speaker 2: party startup and all.
Speaker 1: This is what's so fucked up about this. This puts
Speaker 1: the corporatetocracy in the driver's the technocrats, the scumbags, the ois,
Speaker 1: the freaking people who are the merchants, bandits, thieves, and
Speaker 1: diabolical schemers and killers and child killers. That right there,
Speaker 1: whose second fiddle, The people who wear the plastic metal
Speaker 1: badges and the stupid outfits. That's who any type of
Speaker 1: military or law enforcement that utilizes these cameras for their
Speaker 1: use for their own use, are renting access to them,
Speaker 1: which means you're paying for it obviously, isn't that nice?
Speaker 1: And they don't even know them, the companies do. So
Speaker 1: how does the company have the permission to just put
Speaker 1: these up in the where's the zoning? Where's the permits?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. The rules don't apply when it's a
Speaker 1: government corporatocracy is government masquerading or I should say, the
Speaker 1: true power of a country being expressed in something other
Speaker 1: than governmental bodies, which would be companies, corporations. And it's
Speaker 1: not because capitalism did this, No, it's because your government
Speaker 1: died in eighteen sixty five, it was over with. The
Speaker 1: Jews have owned it since then or this Saturn cult?
Speaker 1: And what are they incorporated? Corporate corporates, corporate dead dead entities.
Speaker 1: That's what a corporation is. It's all part of the witchcraft,
Speaker 1: my friends. And guess what the first corporation in the world,
Speaker 1: as they say, I don't know if you want to
Speaker 1: believe it like that or not, the Holy Roman Empire.
Speaker 2: All off your vehicles whereabouts are being tracked by a
Speaker 2: third party data broker. Well, what if I also told
Speaker 2: you that major retail chains are also using them, and
Speaker 2: they're combining your vehicles whereabouts with your personal information and
Speaker 2: your shopping habits and even your in store behavior, and
Speaker 2: some of them are giving that information to law enforcement.
Speaker 2: And what if I told you that I just possibly
Speaker 2: may have come up with the way to break it.
Speaker 1: Oh you know what, by the way, and I think
Speaker 1: Amazon might actually be have been shown to be guilty
Speaker 1: of this already without me just having to say it,
Speaker 1: because it's not Oh, it's just you talking. Oh look
Speaker 1: at this. That's cool for targeted price increases, So if
Speaker 1: they establish a pattern that you utilize something a lot,
Speaker 1: they will increase the price, but it won't be a
Speaker 1: across the board increase in that price. It's an increased
Speaker 1: price for you. So if someone else logs in and
Speaker 1: tests this from a different IP address with a different
Speaker 1: signature in all and they haven't thought this thing before
Speaker 1: and they don't have that price might be different than
Speaker 1: what they're charging you targeted price increases.
Speaker 14: This Colorado family was being driven to a shopping center
Speaker 14: and a stolen vehicle, and they would have gotten away
Speaker 14: with it without cutting edge technology alerting police of their crime.
Speaker 2: Ye, that was actually an OCR error.
Speaker 14: Well, this New Mexico woman and her twelve year old
Speaker 14: sister were driving to the park with a stolen license
Speaker 14: play when AI enhanced technology allowed police to that one
Speaker 14: was another computer vision error. Well, yet another car thieving
Speaker 14: woman of color caught red hand.
Speaker 2: Nope, just a glitch. This situation keeps happening all over
Speaker 2: the country. Your tax dours pay startups to rent AHI
Speaker 2: superpowers to law enforcement, and then the following year, your
Speaker 2: tax dours pay the lawsuit settlement when it doesn't work.
Speaker 2: Block Safety is a startup that was founded in twenty
Speaker 2: seventeen that specializes in developing and leasing security cameras that
Speaker 2: have AI capabilities such as license plate recognition and vehicle identification.
Speaker 2: And these security cameras feed into databases that law enforcement,
Speaker 2: private companies, and even private citizens can access and utilize.
Speaker 2: And if you own a car in the United States,
Speaker 2: you have unquestionably been logged within one of these databases.
Speaker 2: It works like this, So you drive past a flock
Speaker 2: safety camera and records an image or video, an image
Speaker 2: segmentation model or something similar, looks for the license plate
Speaker 2: itself or a rectangle with some key identifiers like tail
Speaker 2: lights or a rear window. Once it is confident enough
Speaker 2: that it found a license plate, it sends a portion
Speaker 2: of the image to an OCR model or optical Character recognition,
Speaker 2: which is probably the most widely used type of AI
Speaker 2: for consumers. For example, it's used in pds or any
Speaker 2: type of automatic data entry like scanning and casing checks
Speaker 2: on your phone with your bank's app. AI like this
Speaker 2: typically uses a confidence level threshold, so if the OCR
Speaker 2: model is above, say ninety percent sure that your license
Speaker 2: plate was read accurately, then the information is saved with
Speaker 2: a location and timestamp on it. It can also classify
Speaker 2: the make and model of your vehicle and note if
Speaker 2: there are any bumper stickers or add ons or cosmetic
Speaker 2: damage on the vehicle, and this information as well gets
Speaker 2: stored to that database. A law enforcement officer can then
Speaker 2: run your license plate and see every single time that
Speaker 2: your vehicle has been tagged in the database. So if
Speaker 2: you're in a city that has a lot of these cameras,
Speaker 2: it pretty much has the same effect as secretly sticking
Speaker 2: a GPS device on your car. Flock Safety is also
Speaker 2: happy to provide service to businesses and homeowners associations and
Speaker 2: those private clients often allow law enforcement to access the
Speaker 2: data from their cameras. Then there's the hot list. If
Speaker 2: law enforcement puts you on the hot list, they are
Speaker 2: notified every single time that flock detects you. So it's
Speaker 2: kind of like having a police tail all day, every day,
Speaker 2: but without the pesky annoyances of requiring a judicial warrant
Speaker 2: to target and track a citizen who may not even
Speaker 2: be expected of any sort of crime. So now you
Speaker 2: might be asking, what is there to stop I don't know,
Speaker 2: Texas law enforcement tracking women out of state who are
Speaker 2: suspected of getting illegal abortions, Or how would you prevent
Speaker 2: a jealous, abusive person who also happens to be a
Speaker 2: law enforcement officer from using the system to constantly track
Speaker 2: his ex girlfriend and her new partner. Well, unfortunately, you
Speaker 2: wouldn't prevent it, because these are just two of the
Speaker 2: many examples of things that have actually already happened. Flock
Speaker 2: Safety has exhibited the usual hyper aggressive startup behavior that
Speaker 2: we've all grown accustomed to. Near Orlando, Florida, for example,
Speaker 2: they installed nearly one hundred cameras on public roadways without
Speaker 2: even notifying the county, and this entire industry sales pitches
Speaker 2: police departments with their cherry picked success stories. If we
Speaker 2: didn't live in a surveillance state, this old lady with
Speaker 2: dementia would have never been found, or if it weren't
Speaker 2: for all these cameras, this homicide suspect would have never
Speaker 2: been taken off the streets and would still be murdering
Speaker 2: people right now. Had this license plate reader error not
Speaker 2: led to a mother and her young children being held
Speaker 2: at gunpoint, that family would have never received a one
Speaker 2: point nine million dollar settlement from Aurora, Colorado taxpayers. Weirdly,
Speaker 2: I couldn't find that example in any of their sales decks.
Speaker 2: From every single agreement that I've looked up and seen,
Speaker 2: the police department or local government do not own the camera,
Speaker 2: but pays for their installation, then rents them for an
Speaker 2: annual subscription fee, and usually this is between two thousand
Speaker 2: and three thousand dollars per camera per year, but apparently
Speaker 2: there's been a recent price hike that has strained the
Speaker 2: budgets of some police departments. In all these agreements, block
Speaker 2: safeties liability policy is extremely tight and protects them against
Speaker 2: virtually all claims should something go wrong or an equipment
Speaker 2: or data error mislead in investigation. And one of the
Speaker 2: most amusing parts of this agreement is this section that
Speaker 2: is telling the police department to call nine one one
Speaker 2: and not rely on Flock safety services in the event
Speaker 2: of an emergency. Yikes, Civil communities, police departments, private businesses,
Speaker 2: and individuals are not allowed to sell, lease, lend, giveaway, auction,
Speaker 2: or otherwise transfer ownership of any of flock ip or hardware.
Speaker 2: And no given time are you allowed to decompile, disassemble,
Speaker 2: reverse engineer, modify, alter, tamper with, or even repairing if it.
Speaker 2: Later in this video, I'll be disassembling and somewhat reverse
Speaker 2: engineering some ALPR cameras, but not Flock. If I did
Speaker 2: have access to some of Flock's hardware sitting in a
Speaker 2: box right over there, my attorney advises me that showing
Speaker 2: you any of it would jeopardize the existence of this
Speaker 2: video as a whole. A big reason for this aggressive
Speaker 2: scaling is because the business model of companies like this
Speaker 2: is actually quite brilliant. They market themselves as public safety
Speaker 2: services licensing cutting edge technology, but license plate readers and
Speaker 2: security cameras have existed for decades. Block Safety and their
Speaker 2: competitors are data brokers. A city police department, business or
Speaker 2: homeowners association pays to borrow their cameras and then they
Speaker 2: retain the right to make some of that data accessible
Speaker 2: behind the same licensing paywall scheme for other clients or customers.
Speaker 2: And recent Horowitz who is the VC of choice for
Speaker 2: data brokers and big data startups like Data Bricks, five,
Speaker 2: trans Scale AI, and Golden just to name a few.
Speaker 2: They've invested nearly half a billion dollars into flock Safety,
Speaker 2: adding another two hundred and seventy five million just a
Speaker 2: few months ago. These are data broker numbers. For example, EIGHTYT,
Speaker 2: the largest and most recognizable home security company and brand
Speaker 2: in the world, went public in nineteen sixty nine and
Speaker 2: has a market cap of six point eight billion dollars,
Speaker 2: and that market cap is eclipsed by flock Safety's recent
Speaker 2: F series valuation of nearly eight billion dollars. And it
Speaker 2: needs to be pointed out that flock Safety and Andreessen
Speaker 2: Horowitz have spent a combined ninety two million, six hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty thousand dollars in lobbying, and the vast majority
Speaker 2: of that lobbying was in the last year maybe you
Speaker 2: are a law enforcement officer and flock safety has helped
Speaker 2: you solve cases. Or maybe you think that a poorly
Speaker 2: substantiated claim about a drop in crime is worth the
Speaker 2: constant monitoring and tracking of hundreds of millions of tax
Speaker 2: paying citizens who are not criminals. And those small little
Speaker 2: glitches that result in young children being held at gunpoint
Speaker 2: face first on the hot asphalt in a parking lot
Speaker 2: are just some cracked eggs in the overall omelet that
Speaker 2: society is trying to make. And if you agree with that,
Speaker 2: and that's your perspective, fair enough, I strongly disagree with you.
Speaker 2: But this is a conversation that's not even worth having
Speaker 2: because all of this is about to get a whole
Speaker 2: lot worse for everyone except for the billionaires extracting wealth
Speaker 2: from taxpayers.
Speaker 15: Of course, Hey guys, I'm still in the studio. We
Speaker 15: just finished our Q one product launch. Fingers are still
Speaker 15: a little bit shaky. Block Nova is going to change
Speaker 15: the game for criminal investigations. I've heard from so many
Speaker 15: chiefs that they have this system, not system and that system.
Speaker 15: They know they have the data, but it's taking their
Speaker 15: analysts hours and hours to build a case.
Speaker 2: And now flock Nova. It's one click to one case salt.
Speaker 2: Flock Nova is a brand new product that is in
Speaker 2: beta at the time of me recording this, and it
Speaker 2: combines computer aided dispatch, criminal records, video surveillance, automated license
Speaker 2: plate reader data. And here's the kicker, third party data
Speaker 2: acquired by flock safety. What third party data you ask?
Speaker 2: They haven't exactly been transparent. But four O four Media
Speaker 2: asked the same question and found out that flock Nova
Speaker 2: was using data leaked and sold from large scale hacks
Speaker 2: and security breaches. And since that story broke, flock made
Speaker 2: an announcement claiming to no longer be using illegally stolen
Speaker 2: personal data. Most of us, at face value, don't really
Speaker 2: seem to mind, or at least don't think it's a
Speaker 2: big deal that our data is being farmed from us. Like,
Speaker 2: is it really that big of a deal that your
Speaker 2: activity on Pinterest under a mostly anonymized account is being
Speaker 2: stored and analyzed and sold. Well, it becomes a very
Speaker 2: big deal when it's combined with other data and stops
Speaker 2: being so anonymous. And when your health questionnaire information on
Speaker 2: Betterhelp was sold to Facebook where you posted a bunch
Speaker 2: of photos from bars ten years ago, and then all
Speaker 2: of that gets bundled by a data broker with your
Speaker 2: tracked and logged bad driving habits that your vehicle manufacture sold. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's a thing too. Guess what. All of this may
Speaker 2: explain the reason your car insurance costs twice as much
Speaker 2: as anybody else in your ab page demographic, or it
Speaker 2: may explain why you can't seem to get a good
Speaker 2: interest rate on a loan, and now, especially in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five, where something you may have posted a decade
Speaker 2: ago will get you arrested and deported. My point is,
Speaker 2: data privacy never really seems like a big deal until
Speaker 2: it is.
Speaker 1: Some states, that's huge. They're already targeting people from their
Speaker 1: past data to aggregate pricing.
Speaker 2: It's had various laws regarding this, but nobody really seems
Speaker 2: to give a shit because in the few cases where
Speaker 2: they do get caught, the fine or settlement is a
Speaker 2: mere fraction of the income generated from buying and selling
Speaker 2: your third party data. If large retailer or fast food
Speaker 2: chain is not using flock safety, then they're probably using
Speaker 2: some other type.
Speaker 1: Of just checking real quick to make sure everybody's good
Speaker 1: on the audio let's see, I'm a ultimate blackfilt. Let
Speaker 1: me just read these a few times. I didn't mean
Speaker 1: to cut the cut the yea, what do you call it? Know?
Speaker 1: So the flow of whateverlations is a hell of a
Speaker 1: trick to be playing. Yes, yes, yes, the terms you
Speaker 1: is and weaponari straight up not old Jews or evil
Speaker 1: speaking on bloodlines. That is evil is a color blind
Speaker 1: So it is just meet a living FEDS watching this.
Speaker 1: Let's see Anton Riders where we Yeah, that being said
Speaker 1: buck Fever? Alright, were we? Karen?
Speaker 7: Not so?
Speaker 1: No, no stopping it? Nice?
Speaker 16: All right?
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's nice owning your own land, isn't it? Archangel?
Speaker 1: Somebody I'll know that. So we got we got good
Speaker 1: on the audio. No do echo? All right, please tell
Speaker 1: me there's no echo. I had to reset the boarder
Speaker 1: getting ready once, so I'm hoping there's no one. Audio
Speaker 1: is good, Thank you, Karena good good good good good.
Speaker 1: All right, that's that real quick, since we're here ff
Speaker 1: gg media. If it's gonna let me think we got
Speaker 1: nineteen people all right, so it is working. Anybody in
Speaker 1: the chat this time? Hey, look you got lots of chats.
Speaker 1: Look at that.
Speaker 2: What do you know?
Speaker 3: Hello?
Speaker 1: Tom?
Speaker 17: Dwyer.
Speaker 1: Hello, spy hunter. Why is it scrolling the wrong side?
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, yep, okay, cool, all right, moving on, let's
Speaker 1: get back to it. I gotta find him.
Speaker 16: Where do you go?
Speaker 1: That's me? Nope, that's no, that's right, we're here.
Speaker 2: Okay, cool, automated license plate reader. But once you walk
Speaker 2: in those doors, oh my god. Let's just use Walmart's
Speaker 2: corporate privacy policy as an example. They're logging your personal identifiers,
Speaker 2: your name, your phone number, your address, your email, your
Speaker 2: driver's license number, your signature device identifiers such as your
Speaker 2: phone or smart watches, mac address. They're sussing out your age, gender, citizenship, race,
Speaker 2: marital status, household income, education, unemployment information, family health, number
Speaker 2: of children, credit card numbers and other payment information, geolocation history, photographs,
Speaker 2: audio recordings, videos.
Speaker 1: Is just going to Walmart? Now, If you don't think
Speaker 1: that there's a component of big box stores being prisons
Speaker 1: at some point for reassignment, I don't mean gender. I
Speaker 1: mean like splitting up families like they talked about in
Speaker 1: They didn't say the big box stores, and maybe they did.
Speaker 1: I don't remember in Behold a Pale Horse, but that
Speaker 1: he did utilize the scenario of post offices being that
Speaker 1: way with the Postmaster General being armed at that point
Speaker 1: in military and support as they reassign you to different
Speaker 1: work camps. Walmart do the idea of bringing in giant
Speaker 1: warehouses into every town in America under the guys that
Speaker 1: all it's just a benign thing. It's just this department store.
Speaker 1: It's just a J. C. Penny, James Cash Penny. Another freemason,
Speaker 1: big freemason. Oh, it's just Sam Walton's Walmart's right. Whatis
Speaker 1: Sam doing back in the day with internment camps in America?
Speaker 1: You see where this is going. I kind of touch
Speaker 1: upon this a lot in my well, quite a lot
Speaker 1: in my book.
Speaker 2: Fill recordings and if known background checks and criminal convictions. Oh,
Speaker 2: hang on, i'ven't even gotten to the creepy part yet.
Speaker 2: Inferences aka your behavior and preferences from your shopping patterns,
Speaker 2: intelligence and aptitude. And they reserve the right to share
Speaker 2: any and all of this with the third parties, including
Speaker 2: but not limited to you guessed it. It's been reported
Speaker 2: that police departments have been running queries and sharing flock
Speaker 2: Safety these data with ICE. Some home depot and Low's
Speaker 2: locations are also flock Safety customers.
Speaker 1: And they all noticed that's always the three. And they're
Speaker 1: usually positioned very close to another, like a home depot
Speaker 1: and Walmart usually in bigger towns, very close to one another.
Speaker 1: The layouts are a certain way, and then you have
Speaker 1: a Low is not too far away from them. And
Speaker 1: they're all big warehouses, very big warehouses, especially lows in
Speaker 1: home depot. You could turn those very quickly with a
Speaker 1: crew of National Guard or military of some sort into
Speaker 1: razor wired electrified prisons. And who knows, maybe it would
Speaker 1: just be that day you went in for some screws
Speaker 1: and we weren't allowed to come back out. Could be
Speaker 1: as could be as sudden as that.
Speaker 2: Also been known to share flock safety data.
Speaker 1: And by the way, they also do facial reconditioning in
Speaker 1: the door of Walmart too, so it's not just cameras
Speaker 1: taking video of you, but they're also doing in depth
Speaker 1: ai UH integrated data seeking and mining from you. And
Speaker 1: they reserved the right so cheap prices you already you already,
Speaker 1: we already killed all the small businesses by out outpricing them,
Speaker 1: and now we're going to, I don't know, make even
Speaker 1: more money off of you. Then they don't even have
Speaker 1: to charge you for the groceries basically because they're under government.
Speaker 1: Well again, colereporatocracy contracts to share your information that they
Speaker 1: stole from you in the first place by walking in
Speaker 1: the door that that was that was your your consent.
Speaker 1: Isn't that nice you walked into their place. They reserved
Speaker 1: the right to do whatever they want in their place.
Speaker 2: Law enforcement, it might be safe to assume that some
Speaker 2: of the immigration rates happening at home, depo and closed
Speaker 2: locations may be connected to this honeypot of data. So
Speaker 2: when an immigrant it picks up some construction supplies before work,
Speaker 2: the store will then send the license plate in vehicle
Speaker 2: identification data to flock safety that would trigger in a
Speaker 2: word on a hot list, and just like that, mask
Speaker 2: men arrive and pick up the venezuelan.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but how often do you think that's happening? If anything,
Speaker 1: if they're doing anything, they're taking out people that are
Speaker 1: competition to their own drug trade, the governmental military drug trade,
Speaker 1: which the cost guard are complicit. And I wish that
Speaker 1: wasn't true, but I have no other way of deducing
Speaker 1: what I experienced than that than it to be that
Speaker 1: that the only police are competition.
Speaker 2: And day laborer with no criminal record.
Speaker 1: I think I think the biggest problem that Pavel Escobar
Speaker 1: had is that we wasn't Jewish enough. You know, that's
Speaker 1: their industry, that's their industry. How dare you not cut
Speaker 1: them in on a massive amount of you or you know,
Speaker 1: your empire, in your in your network.
Speaker 2: And ship them off to a prison camp. And I'll
Speaker 2: Salvador like, why can't y'all just can sell tools?
Speaker 10: So we have these.
Speaker 2: Creepy AI cameras everywhere proving every paranoid schizophrenic person right
Speaker 2: by logging our vehicles every move for police, retailers and
Speaker 2: even gated communities.
Speaker 1: Then we, by the way, the other element of this
Speaker 1: is that they also give this information to people who
Speaker 1: they already have on the payroll for gang stocking. Keep
Speaker 1: seeing the same homeless guy every day? Do you always
Speaker 1: looking at you funny? It's trying to make it intimidated.
Speaker 1: They try to drive you to suicide or some other
Speaker 1: rash action, or just make you feel crazy so that
Speaker 1: they can institutionalize you. This is things that the government
Speaker 1: does because this is what oive underheadedness is. And they
Speaker 1: also are the ones we can credit for psychiatry. Frankist
Speaker 1: was behind that. You know somebody who's probably did by
Speaker 1: his family and pass around. Yeah yeah, great person to
Speaker 1: judge what normal is and other people is somebody that
Speaker 1: was in a Frankest family, Sigmund Freud.
Speaker 2: We have retailers building advanced personal and psychological profiles about us,
Speaker 2: which are then being traded to data brokers and combined
Speaker 2: with our Internet shopping browsing and social media activity, and
Speaker 2: now law enforcement data brokers are buying it all up.
Speaker 2: Here's a hard truth that we all need to know
Speaker 2: and consider. If every single actor in this database brokerage theater,
Speaker 2: we're playing by the rules and following every single law
Speaker 2: and acting ethically, your data is still only as safe
Speaker 2: as the database with the weakest security policies or that
Speaker 2: one employee that falls for the phishing email. In twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four alone, if we are only counting data breaches
Speaker 2: that were formally reported, that number exceeds over ten thousand incidents,
Speaker 2: affecting four point two billion compromised records. But if you're not,
Speaker 2: our legislators are coming to our rescue by banning TikTok?
Speaker 2: Did I hear that right? And it kind of doesn't
Speaker 2: even matter at this point, debating the safeguarding of persons.
Speaker 1: They were banning TikTok at the time of this video,
Speaker 1: but no, they just were powerbrokering to merge and acquire
Speaker 1: and take and steal and then buy out for pennies
Speaker 1: on the dollar. I'm sure of what so that. I
Speaker 1: think China based TikTok, if there is such a thing,
Speaker 1: is still theirs. But on the American front, of course,
Speaker 1: it's Larry Ellison and his gaggle of stodamites all data
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: It's like standing on the burnt remains of a home
Speaker 2: and debating what kind of fire extinguisher you're going to
Speaker 2: put in the kitchen. This next section isn't about big
Speaker 2: data or retailer, So we're going to circle back to
Speaker 2: the data mining that your tax dollars pay for, and
Speaker 2: we're going to see just how insecure it is, and
Speaker 2: we're going to try to come up with some ways
Speaker 2: to defend ourselves from it. In this chapter, be.
Speaker 1: Technic that was like straight up Atari style.
Speaker 2: Plead, going over how ALPR cameras work and examining a
Speaker 2: few hardware vulnerabilities. But we kind of don't have to.
Speaker 2: From what I gathered, flock safety cameras can be reached
Speaker 2: by bluetooth and without breaking off into a.
Speaker 1: Completely exces right, So you and and the flock can
Speaker 1: be uh macaddress identified and communicated with through bluetooth. So
Speaker 1: if you have a Bluetooth device like he has, where
Speaker 1: they can identify those things, you can figure out what's
Speaker 1: what and what's hone in on one particular one, or
Speaker 1: at least get the data of that device that's being
Speaker 1: shared openly. Not everybody knows how to do that, so
Speaker 1: it's pretty much unnecessary for them to secure something that
Speaker 1: nobody understands how to do in the first place, or
Speaker 1: what they would do with it once they were able
Speaker 1: to identify it. But here's the thing too then, remember
Speaker 1: I don't know if you recall this. I don't know
Speaker 1: if it was in Great Britain or UK, or if
Speaker 1: it was here or if it was both. But there
Speaker 1: were people that were splitting open going up to the
Speaker 1: top of the towers and they were reading the stickers,
Speaker 1: which is kind of strange. It almost seems like it
Speaker 1: was like a put on, Like it's like a stage prop,
Speaker 1: like a plot device. But the cameras or the light
Speaker 1: the light fixtures of the street lights. Not only were
Speaker 1: the led and li fi and identifying and doing stuff
Speaker 1: for you, you know, you know, to you, but they
Speaker 1: were also written with things I said, like COVID or
Speaker 1: something like that on them. So that to me makes
Speaker 1: me wonder is this transmitting something in the air because
Speaker 1: we know that a certain type of frequency that they're
Speaker 1: well aware of that microwave radiation can admit, but maybe
Speaker 1: other things can too, the natural gases in the air.
Speaker 1: So then this is where they get to play their
Speaker 1: virus game and say it's a virus spreading and you
Speaker 1: get to hate your neighbor and blame them. What if
Speaker 1: they're just making a hig concentration of cyanide in the
Speaker 1: atmosphere in certain particular target areas to say that this
Speaker 1: is a breakout area. They wouldn't have to do anything.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't have to put anything in the water. They
Speaker 1: could just do it with the air. Because hypoxia occurs
Speaker 1: when you're getting not double bonded nitrogen and oxygen in
Speaker 1: your lungs now, the iron in the and the oxygen don't,
Speaker 1: don't you know, adhere to the hemoglobin properly unless you
Speaker 1: get cyanide shots. And we'll talk about that a little
Speaker 1: bit more in a second here, but that's that's a
Speaker 1: potentiality right there, that they would be emitting something in
Speaker 1: your neighborhood. They want people to feel the symptoms to
Speaker 1: scare them into going to the hospital where they get traked,
Speaker 1: defented or whatever the hell shot up around Desavere and
Speaker 1: god knows what else against their will because they're now
Speaker 1: in a forced coma and the parents and the families
Speaker 1: aren't allowed or the wives or the husbands aren't allowed
Speaker 1: to say dick to them otherwise they get escorted out
Speaker 1: and they freaking flat out murder you. They carry it
Speaker 1: to the end.
Speaker 2: Security is not Bluetooth strength to flock securities credit. From
Speaker 2: what I could tell, all the Bluetooth seems to be
Speaker 2: doing is relaying hardware and status information about the camera
Speaker 2: and transmission system. The camera system also has a Wi
Speaker 2: Fi radio that acts as a router with WPA two encryption,
Speaker 2: which a lot of consumer products still used despite it
Speaker 2: being a twenty year old technology with a lot of flaws.
Speaker 1: One of those biggest things, here's my question, while you
Speaker 1: while you're accessing its information, that it's transmitting the fact
Speaker 1: that something is receiving it. Can that be detected? Do
Speaker 1: they if they wanted to, could they make it a
Speaker 1: parent or make him aware that they know that he's
Speaker 1: checking in on that camera? Is there something that lets
Speaker 1: people know that there's some sort of communication going there?
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe just receiving you don't really have, but
Speaker 1: if it's wireless, there's got to be a give in
Speaker 1: a take right.
Speaker 2: Vulnerabilities is in the handshake. If you were to try
Speaker 2: to guess the passcode on an iPhone, you have about
Speaker 2: six tries before the device times out and makes.
Speaker 1: You wait, this is really interesting here, or you can
Speaker 1: try again.
Speaker 2: And this is the same or very similar for any
Speaker 2: smartphone or Gmail or any modern log in page with
Speaker 2: WPA two Wi Fi, there's a pre shared password key,
Speaker 2: and an attacker can capture the handshake on their own
Speaker 2: device so they can stick their GPU on it. And
Speaker 2: if everything's updated and working properly and there are no
Speaker 2: other security vulnerabilities at all on the router, a modern
Speaker 2: gaming GPU can crack an eight digit key in under
Speaker 2: three hours. If your Wi Fi password is a known
Speaker 2: word that would be in a password dictionary, I'd give
Speaker 2: it about sixty seconds. With some other vendors and services,
Speaker 2: you don't actually have to crack anything because they fail
Speaker 2: to secure their RTSP video feeds properly. And in just
Speaker 2: a few hours, with some specialized search engines, I managed
Speaker 2: to browse my way into accessing live feeds from over
Speaker 2: two dozen traffic cameras. And what's even more troubling is
Speaker 2: that in a couple small towns that I audited, if
Speaker 2: one camera wasn't secured, none of them. We're allowing anyone
Speaker 2: the capability of tracking every single vehicle in the town
Speaker 2: indefinitely without ever having to see or write a line
Speaker 2: of code another.
Speaker 1: And we're in the age of at least potential for
Speaker 1: people in our government to give off the impression that
Speaker 1: there's some sort of rogue terrorist group that's going to
Speaker 1: strike something, when we know damn well who that would
Speaker 1: actually be. But just imagine this also gives any maniac
Speaker 1: that has a little bit of money and a crew
Speaker 1: of techi's the ability to do this type of tracking.
Speaker 1: And also even though they're still going to be protected
Speaker 1: by the system, because the system is the judicial system
Speaker 1: as well, imagine if they decided somebody was looking through
Speaker 1: the catalog of children that they call Facebook and said
Speaker 1: I want that one. They have all the cameras in
Speaker 1: the world to decide when that child has no supervision
Speaker 1: for even half a second.
Speaker 2: About that probably In example, Hickvision the largest IP camera
Speaker 2: company in the world. They make all types of cameras,
Speaker 2: many of which have ALPR technology and are marketing towards
Speaker 2: police departments. In twenty twenty two, hackers were able to
Speaker 2: not only view the feed, but exploit the firmware used
Speaker 2: in over eighty thousand cameras, allowing them to execute code remotely.
Speaker 2: And then just last year, the Russian military compromised hick
Speaker 2: Vision cameras in Ukraine to obtain intelligence to plan air
Speaker 2: strikes on Kiev and subvert Ukraine's air defense systems. In fact,
Speaker 2: right now at the time of me recording this video,
Speaker 2: you can download an exploit for Hickvision cameras on GitHub
Speaker 2: that allows you to view the feed, retrieve snapshots, and
Speaker 2: extract user credentials. Then you have Verkata, a massive security
Speaker 2: camera company.
Speaker 1: Who it's almost as if they want people who have
Speaker 1: a little bit of a technical proless to be able
Speaker 1: to access these cameras. Is that plausible deniability that Oh no,
Speaker 1: it wasn't a governmental body. Oh no, it wasn't the
Speaker 1: police force that was, you know, sending up this pre
Speaker 1: crime shit. No, it must have been some rogue hackers,
Speaker 1: some techies, some cyberpunks. Yeah, I don't know, I don't know,
Speaker 1: but it seems like they are making it pretty easy
Speaker 1: for anybody to access these cameras. I'm sure they'd only
Speaker 1: be doing it for good. Yeah, it's funny.
Speaker 2: Chairman has bragged about locking clients into a predatory subscription model.
Speaker 18: There is a harbor component and a licensing component. Now
Speaker 18: the license you might have bought a one year license,
Speaker 18: but you like literally bolted the hardware to your ceiling,
Speaker 18: so like you're not taking it that.
Speaker 2: Many of their clients and healthcare, prisons, police departments, and
Speaker 2: so on couldn't afford to leave for a more secure ecosystem.
Speaker 2: So when every single one of their one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty thousand plus cameras were hacked due to a corporate
Speaker 2: administrator account having their user name and password publicly exposed
Speaker 2: on the Internet, hackers not only had access to the
Speaker 2: private video feeds, but the network set they were connected to,
Speaker 2: and they.
Speaker 7: Were also able to act to the archive of those
Speaker 7: cameras as well, but that has been saved by the customer.
Speaker 2: If there's one way to give me completely obsessed about
Speaker 2: something technical, it's to tell me that I'm not allowed
Speaker 2: to learn about it. And few industries are cagier about
Speaker 2: technical analysis or pen testing than the security camera industry.
Speaker 2: One would assume that it's because they do not want
Speaker 2: through general public figuring out the technical function of a
Speaker 2: device that people depend on for security, and by forcing
Speaker 2: customers into tight agreements or cease in assisting anybody who
Speaker 2: posts a disassembly video that they're making you safer. If
Speaker 2: you're buying, or if you're in the market of buying
Speaker 2: any type of home, business, or civic security device or solution,
Speaker 2: you should be looking for a solution with a high
Speaker 2: level of openness and transparency. Probably about the worst thing
Speaker 2: that a nerdy YouTube channel can do to malicious hackers
Speaker 2: is make content publicly reporting on security vulnerabilities, because it
Speaker 2: forces the manufacturers to swiftly correct those vulnerabilities or face
Speaker 2: losing customers to competitors. I started my journey here by
Speaker 2: obtaining one of the most popular license plate recognition cameras
Speaker 2: that are mounted on police cars made by Vigilant Solution,
Speaker 2: which is a tough sounding name that Motorola uses when
Speaker 2: trying to market to law enforcement agencies. It truly did
Speaker 2: feel like more of Motorolo's efforts when into obfuscating its
Speaker 2: functionality and making it absurdly proprietary than the part that
Speaker 2: reads license plates. And ironically it had a micro SD
Speaker 2: card in it with un encrypted data. Yeah, not great.
Speaker 2: Most of them have two different camera sensors, one for
Speaker 2: the daytime and one for the nighttime, and then a
Speaker 2: bunch of infrared light emitters. So, for example, if a
Speaker 2: police officer is driving behind a vehicle at night, it'll
Speaker 2: send out an infrared flash and then take a photo
Speaker 2: at a very high frame rate, so it's under exposed
Speaker 2: everywhere but the infrared reflection from the license plate itself.
Speaker 2: And keep in mind that our human eyeballs are not
Speaker 2: able to see infrared lights, so you or the police
Speaker 2: officer probably doesn't even realize that a flash is taking place.
Speaker 2: I'll demonstrate this really quick. Here is a longer exposure
Speaker 2: with no infrared flash. Here is a longer exposure with
Speaker 2: an infrared flash. Here's a very fast exposure with the
Speaker 2: infrared flash anyway, This channel's attorney has expressed some concern
Speaker 2: over the complicated legalities of powering the camera on and
Speaker 2: using it in this video, considering how I obtained it,
Speaker 2: and no, I did not steal it off of a
Speaker 2: police cuck. So instead I took it apart and analyzed
Speaker 2: just about every chip on it, and then rebuilt something
Speaker 2: similar to the functionality of the daytime camera to see
Speaker 2: if I can get a nice license plate reader on
Speaker 2: my truck just like the police have. And then, rather
Speaker 2: than sending all the data to an external computer or server,
Speaker 2: I figured I might as well try to do everything
Speaker 2: in a sleek device that I put together. I put
Speaker 2: a Raspberry Pie five behind a seven inch touchscreen display,
Speaker 2: then used a USB camera module with the exact same
Speaker 2: specs as the daytime camera. As mentioned earlier, the first
Speaker 2: order of business is image segmentation, or finding the license
Speaker 2: plate itself, and this was the most challenging part that
Speaker 2: required the moment.
Speaker 1: Do you guys are ever Solar Winds that huge security
Speaker 1: breach in twenty twenty It was a Solar Winds hat.
Speaker 1: What do you think is really behind that? You really
Speaker 1: think it was rushing for intelligence? Give me a fucking
Speaker 1: break the still little wins of Ryan network management software. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so I'm going to go ahead and say that was
Speaker 1: more government doing tests, checking out what they can do
Speaker 1: and what they can't do. And when I say government,
Speaker 1: of course mean the thing that really un runs them,
Speaker 1: which is a cryporatography and the cult it's.
Speaker 2: Tweaking because rectangles are everywhere.
Speaker 1: Oh see, I don't think we're even seeing the full
Speaker 1: impact of what happened in twenty twenty yet, with what
Speaker 1: they've gathered and what they acquired from that breach, from
Speaker 1: that hack.
Speaker 2: Or the plate reading part of this project worked just fine.
Speaker 2: But if this were my police department and I was
Speaker 2: the chief, I'd demand better. And ultimately, what's the point
Speaker 2: of doing all of this if we're not going to
Speaker 2: create a future proof method of using technology to allow
Speaker 2: citizens to opt out from being logged by these types
Speaker 2: of devices. So we need some more modern AI. There
Speaker 2: are quite a few license plate reader models available in
Speaker 2: a virtually endless supply of shape recognition models. YOLO or
Speaker 2: You'll Only Look Once seemed to perform the most accurate
Speaker 2: out of the bunch, and it was working much better
Speaker 2: than the open ALPR based models. That some popular public
Speaker 2: safety data broker companies used. So YOA was also pretty
Speaker 2: power hungry, so I had to add a Halo AI
Speaker 2: board with twenty six tops to my little police computer here.
Speaker 2: And then I decided to switch to a camera that
Speaker 2: communicated directly with the pie board with dual channels, and
Speaker 2: that way I wouldn't have to deal with the overhead
Speaker 2: of a USB controller. I know this is so dorky,
Speaker 2: but look, we have an incredibly powerful computer vision system
Speaker 2: that's much more accurate than anything on the market for
Speaker 2: law enforcement, and it probably cost me around two hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty dollars if you don't count the trial and error.
Speaker 2: And what's better is I could probably use an accurate
Speaker 2: computer vision system for future projects. Or maybe it'll just
Speaker 2: simply let me know in one of my chickens escapes.
Speaker 2: But in the meantime, we're going to pump it through
Speaker 2: Recourse Scout, a company similar to Flock Safety that also
Speaker 2: allows the option of sharing my data to the police.
Speaker 5: It's extremely secure sharing network.
Speaker 1: Whenever I watch a video like this, I'm like, man,
Speaker 1: as much as I thought I was doing productive things,
Speaker 1: I haven't. I had a misspent youth. Maybe this is
Speaker 1: something that's learnable, but it's not something that I could
Speaker 1: have just from you know, from scratch, just been like,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, I can do all that and I understand
Speaker 1: all that, and yeah yeah, yeada. I wasn't in the
Speaker 1: techie world.
Speaker 14: In my mind.
Speaker 1: That was historian reader, bodybuilder for a while there, and
Speaker 1: uh yeah, more like a radio man then I was
Speaker 1: an it.
Speaker 5: Work allows agencies to access data and records from any
Speaker 5: other participating partner across the ReCore ecosystem, including residential members
Speaker 5: of our ReCore Scout home package.
Speaker 2: Come to think of it, now that I'm saying this
Speaker 2: out low, this also presents a pretty big security vulnerability,
Speaker 2: as I could just rob a bank and then supply
Speaker 2: input data with an RTSP stream tagging me driving my
Speaker 2: vehicle four hundred miles away from the bank. But anyway,
Speaker 2: all right, so welcome to Ben's top Models AI models.
Speaker 2: We have ReCore.
Speaker 1: You catch that? So, yeah, you just supply it with
Speaker 1: footage from a different day, in a time and the
Speaker 1: time that you were actually wreaking havoc. Isn't that nice?
Speaker 1: Overlay it splice it in patch, it slap it over
Speaker 1: the top. Hmmm. I wonder how often that happens, so
Speaker 1: that the true culprit is never caught and the Patsy.
Speaker 2: Goes down yolo V eleven plate.
Speaker 1: They could also do that to you, put you in
Speaker 1: someplace that you weren't.
Speaker 2: Igniser and classic open alpr for our four license plate
Speaker 2: and vehicle tracking test subjects. And I even made a
Speaker 2: custom license plate for this project, which is oooh, that's
Speaker 2: also what I will make my DJ.
Speaker 1: Name DJ puh five thousand.
Speaker 10: Ben Jordan is taking a more direct approach. He wants
Speaker 10: to confuse the AIS using something called adversarial.
Speaker 14: Noise, confusing AI models and preventing them from replicating the track.
Speaker 2: If you've been here before, you may have seen my
Speaker 2: ongoing project that encodes music files with noise that AI
Speaker 2: hears but humans cannot. It effectively makes instrument and John.
Speaker 1: You just see that at list base he had there
Speaker 1: in the corner.
Speaker 2: Well, the classifiers completely confused, and that makes the AI
Speaker 2: here complete and utter nonsense. The whole point of that
Speaker 2: project was to develop something that would prevent AI companies
Speaker 2: from scraping my and others albums and reselling the data
Speaker 2: as an AI music service, and so far the algorithm
Speaker 2: is working very well and improving, and the reason.
Speaker 1: I developed, and you're also getting your proprietary You're your property,
Speaker 1: your artistic property. You're intellectual property stolen by tech and
Speaker 1: then repurposed. Isn't that nice? Isn't that nice?
Speaker 2: Things like this is because the people that we've elected
Speaker 2: to protect our intellectual property and our privacy rights aren't
Speaker 2: doing their jobs. So if we want any sort of
Speaker 2: defense from this, we need to roll up our sleeves
Speaker 2: and use technology to defend ourselves. Sometimes videos like this
Speaker 2: are controversial because adversarial noise attacks have the potential of
Speaker 2: becoming a pretty big, expensive problem for the AI industry especially.
Speaker 1: Think about this, Is there a way to gumb up
Speaker 1: the works for utilizing what they consider copyrighted license material
Speaker 1: when you want to just play a fucking song for
Speaker 1: two minutes in a YouTube video? Is there a way
Speaker 1: if you did a pre recording of that video that
Speaker 1: you're gonna post rather than play it live, that you
Speaker 1: could somehow interfere with the signaling that the AI is
Speaker 1: actually recognizing, so it doesn't recognize it as the patterned
Speaker 1: signature of that actual album or you know, whatever that
Speaker 1: song happens to be. It sounds like that's where he's
Speaker 1: going with this. That'd be cool because the people hear
Speaker 1: the same thing, but it's like the ones and zeros
Speaker 1: are arranged differently to wherever the hell, you.
Speaker 2: Know, at least since the vast majority of that industry
Speaker 2: is just rapidly feature hunting while building on top of
Speaker 2: pre existing AI models that just work. For example, you
Speaker 2: can't ask an AI model how exactly it recognizes a
Speaker 2: face because it doesn't have a human brain or eyes,
Speaker 2: nor is it equipped with a conscious based intelligence capable
Speaker 2: of actually recognizing a person. This black box problem, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Black cube?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Cube? Yeah? Yeah? Imagine that their technology would be based
Speaker 1: on a pixel or a cube. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah,
Speaker 1: feed forward obfuscation, it's pattern recognition, white box, white box testing,
Speaker 1: great box testing system in a black box oracle machine?
Speaker 3: Ah?
Speaker 1: Is that what it sounds like? Is that what it
Speaker 1: sounds like? In science, computing and engineering, a black box
Speaker 1: is a system which can be viewed in terms of
Speaker 1: inputs and outputs or transfer characteristics. You mean, like the cube. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just like the same thing without any knowledge, and we
Speaker 1: are either into the cube and think we're outside of it.
Speaker 1: And that's also the shape of the holid deck on
Speaker 1: star Trek with all the illusions that keep us distracted
Speaker 1: and engaged in the programming so that we prefer it
Speaker 1: over reality. Isn't that something as well? It's like a
Speaker 1: vacation escape from the ship to go into the holidack
Speaker 1: and run a program without any knowledge of its internal workings. Okay,
Speaker 1: so it's those through this all thettlegetter. In science, computing
Speaker 1: and engineering, a black box is a system which can
Speaker 1: be viewed in terms of its inputs and outputs, or
Speaker 1: transfer characteristic characteristics without any knowledge of its internal workings.
Speaker 1: It's a big mystery in there. Its implementation is opague,
Speaker 1: a term can The term can be used to refer
Speaker 1: to many inner workings, such as those of a transistor.
Speaker 1: And they even have it on. It's canted right, it's
Speaker 1: already so that if you're looking at it from above,
Speaker 1: it's a hexagram, just like the freaking Saturn thing right.
Speaker 1: In terms of transistor engine algorithm, in human brain or
Speaker 1: an institution or government, to analyze an open system with
Speaker 1: a typical black box approach, only the behavior of the
Speaker 1: stimulus response will be accounted for. To infer the unknown,
Speaker 1: the the the usual representation of this black box system
Speaker 1: is a data flu diagram centered in the box. Saturn
Speaker 1: get incorporated into all things, the opposite of a black
Speaker 1: and maybe maybe that also indicates why it was a
Speaker 1: black hub in the first place, that was the Saturn symbol,
Speaker 1: because maybe they already went to this hype before. Maybe
Speaker 1: the technology has already been here and gone a few
Speaker 1: times cyclically, and maybe mankind in the previous pet and
Speaker 1: the previous times purposely destroyed tech because of where it
Speaker 1: was growing out of control. And then these little fucking
Speaker 1: merchant pricks, these little demons, these little these little child killers,
Speaker 1: grab a hold of some sort of artifact, something that's
Speaker 1: still transmitting receiving. Some of this has the entity of
Speaker 1: AI able to be woken up in it, and that
Speaker 1: becomes their oracle, that becomes their their source of information
Speaker 1: on how to rebuild it. So it's not oh man,
Speaker 1: oh man, oh man. The places you could go with
Speaker 1: that analogy. The opposite of a black box is the
Speaker 1: system where the intercomponents or logic are available for inspection,
Speaker 1: which is most commonly referred to as a white box,
Speaker 1: sometimes also known as a clear box or a glass
Speaker 1: box in cybernetics, A full treatment was given by Ross Ashby.
Speaker 1: Black box was described okay, okay.
Speaker 2: Really a problem when an ANI model manages to generate
Speaker 2: an image or a song or record.
Speaker 1: In systems theory, the black box is an abstraction represented
Speaker 1: representing a class of concrete open system which can be
Speaker 1: viewed solely in terms of its stimuli, inputs, and output reactions.
Speaker 1: The constitution and structure of the box are altogether irrelevant
Speaker 1: to the approach under consideration, which is purely external or phenomenological.
Speaker 1: In other words, only the behavior of the system will
Speaker 1: be accounted for input open systems and boundary.
Speaker 2: Nis a license plate, it just works, but when somebody
Speaker 2: introduces an attack that prevents the model from working, you
Speaker 2: can't just open it up and fix a few things.
Speaker 2: A few years ago, with something called nightshade, some tech
Speaker 2: savvy artists attempted to poison pill their artwork by introducing
Speaker 2: invisible noise to the image that confused models trained for
Speaker 2: image generators, and it worked incredibly well at first. Luckily
Speaker 2: for generative AI companies, they figured out that by adding
Speaker 2: some blur to the images, then using another AI algorithm
Speaker 2: to sharpen those images, they could remove most of the
Speaker 2: confusing noise. That's not exactly a great solution or a
Speaker 2: cure for the problem. It's more like a bandage because
Speaker 2: now training image models takes longer and costs more due
Speaker 2: to these additions to the data processing workflow, and that
Speaker 2: particular bandage isn't going to be great for optical character
Speaker 2: recognition used by license plate readers because the whole point
Speaker 2: of the technology is accurately outputting texts from an image,
Speaker 2: not generating abstract license plate photos. So with that being said,
Speaker 2: here's what we're going to be doing here. I have
Speaker 2: a license plate database and I make one thousand identical
Speaker 2: traffic images with a plate superimposed on a car. If
Speaker 2: a license plate isn't even detected at all by both models,
Speaker 2: meaning that it doesn't even see the plate or rectangle itself,
Speaker 2: that gets moved to class A. If the license plate
Speaker 2: was detected with both models but it got the plate
Speaker 2: information wrong, that moves to class B. Then if either
Speaker 2: model to texts and reads it correctly, it goes to
Speaker 2: class C, which is a controller. Then I do this
Speaker 2: a whole lot of times with a whole lot of
Speaker 2: different license plates and create a robust data set to
Speaker 2: train a new model whose job is to generate abstract,
Speaker 2: invisible license plate overlay patterns that cannot be detected by humans,
Speaker 2: but make license plate recognition systems utterly shit at the BET.
Speaker 2: So I put the processing application up here on GitHub
Speaker 2: and want to install Processing. It's pretty easy to use
Speaker 2: and everything is kind of explained in the code itself.
Speaker 2: Once you configure everything correctly, you'll have a bunch of
Speaker 2: images like this where you will have tiny bits of
Speaker 2: noise on your plate. Some will be more or less
Speaker 2: conspicuous than others. Now we need to test those images.
Speaker 2: I created a Python proving ground to do that, so
Speaker 2: once the libraries.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I haven't been I haven't gotten the whole to
Speaker 1: the whole Python thing yet. That's something else I need
Speaker 1: to look into utilizing.
Speaker 2: Your GPU are installed and you run the script, it
Speaker 2: will open up a little dialogue where you will select
Speaker 2: a folder. It will go through every single image in
Speaker 2: the folder, and it will create a new folder and
Speaker 2: fill it up with images which will tell you where
Speaker 2: it detected a license plate and what it thinks it
Speaker 2: read and a confidence value of that. We have POO
Speaker 2: five thousand with the original. We have MOVE five thousand
Speaker 2: with one of the perturbed we have PDQ fiveho nine
Speaker 2: nine zhoo five do five thousand, pooh five do. And
Speaker 2: then what I'm really interested in. On some of these,
Speaker 2: it didn't detect a plate at all. Somehow the noise
Speaker 2: pattern actually perturbed the image segmentation model detecting a rectangle
Speaker 2: on a vehicle. And if we could figure out what
Speaker 2: pattern is breaking the image segmentation like detecting the license
Speaker 2: plate itself, and it's possible that you could just have
Speaker 2: a license plate holder that doesn't obfuscate the plate at all.
Speaker 2: That could make it much less likely to be read
Speaker 2: by the AI in the license plate readers. Oh in
Speaker 2: my little Python app here also, it puts all the
Speaker 2: data into a CSV file, just so you could analyze
Speaker 2: all the data in front of you at once. It
Speaker 2: was time to test this in the real world against
Speaker 2: these prototypes, I thought it would be fun to print
Speaker 2: out the noise on transparent adhesive sheets for might pooh
Speaker 2: five thousand license plate. This is just an easy way
Speaker 2: to test the patterns and definitely not something you would
Speaker 2: actually want to put on your car and drive on
Speaker 2: public roadways, unless you miss your friends in prison.
Speaker 6: They offer CERTs just a little mud from all my
Speaker 6: off roading.
Speaker 2: Twelve miles per hour. I'm definitely throwing these cameras as softball.
Speaker 2: Let's do one at congested parking lot speeds. I mean
Speaker 2: that's like essentially holding text right up to the camera
Speaker 2: and it looks like a normal license plate. Some of
Speaker 2: these ALPR models are not as visually interesting as others,
Speaker 2: so rather than just showing a bash terminal scrolling text
Speaker 2: will stick with footage of the ones, or I could
Speaker 2: pump live video in and get real time results. So
Speaker 2: with no adversarial voice, just the raw license plate. It
Speaker 2: detected pooh five thousand. This is adversarial noise layer A
Speaker 2: and it's definitely pretty confused and it doesn't seem to
Speaker 2: pass the confidence threshold to even register a plate at all.
Speaker 2: I tried to ban one plate because it's a style
Speaker 2: that hasn't been used in like thirty or forty years,
Speaker 2: and it has read a text and it's just very
Speaker 2: different than the one that we were trying to attack
Speaker 2: initially with the black noise, and it definitely does confuse
Speaker 2: it quite a bit. All right, this is YOOV eight boo. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Not all of them passed the test, which was completely expected.
Speaker 2: But a lot of them did. And I'm reasonably confident
Speaker 2: that if I just screen printed some of these on
Speaker 2: a plate and slapped it on my vehicle, I'd be
Speaker 2: a traffic camera ninja. And again, these are probably not
Speaker 2: street legal anyway, and are just training data for the
Speaker 2: final model, which will ideally be completely invisible to the
Speaker 2: human eye and not obstruct the license plate in any
Speaker 2: perceivable way. When it made the video about Harmony Cloak
Speaker 2: and when I introduced Poisonify, my AI music defense algorithm,
Speaker 2: I got inundated by people asking for a user friendly
Speaker 2: app or website where they could use it on their
Speaker 2: own music. I got vcs wanting to invest in it,
Speaker 2: in companies wanting to exclusively own it, and I'm flattered,
Speaker 2: if not surprised, by that level of enthusiasm, and it's
Speaker 2: actually really inspiring. But this channel is a nonprofit organization
Speaker 2: that allows me to do independent research on whatever it
Speaker 2: lay this monster by that lives in the mearch, on
Speaker 2: whatever it is that I feel like researching, and then
Speaker 2: share those ideas for free publicly. And it's my dream job.
Speaker 2: And that same set of principles applies to this project.
Speaker 2: In Greek mythology, there's this venomous, multi headed serpent that
Speaker 2: lives in the swamps and it goes by the name
Speaker 2: of the Alarm in Hydra and anytime that somebody tried
Speaker 2: to slay this monster by.
Speaker 1: The Jews, but it's also the Vatican, and it's also
Speaker 1: this it's also into European people who are part of
Speaker 1: that cult from the very beginning, with long standing bloodlines, yes,
Speaker 1: many hydra heads.
Speaker 2: Looking off one of its heads, they would see two
Speaker 2: heads grow back in its place instantly. And this monster
Speaker 2: costs many generations to live in fear until.
Speaker 1: Is anybody else's eyes getting all jacked up from his shirt.
Speaker 2: One very powerful and brave man was tasked with destroying it.
Speaker 2: Donald J. Trump or or John Wick. I'm not really sure.
Speaker 2: If projects like this have any hope of putting a
Speaker 2: dent in things technologically or inspiring legislation to further protect
Speaker 2: people's ip or privacy, then you're going to need a
Speaker 2: whole lot of people.
Speaker 1: Work proof again that people can be very intelligent and
Speaker 1: tech savvy but have absolutely no idea what's going on
Speaker 1: with their own what they considered to be government. If
Speaker 1: you're going to throw Donald J. Trump the silver crown,
Speaker 1: King of the Torah in there as a savior, come
Speaker 1: on man.
Speaker 2: And creatively on solutions and sharing that information with one another.
Speaker 2: And that way, if AI companies figure out a way around.
Speaker 1: Me, do'll never like relax and submit to perceived intellectual
Speaker 1: and furiority just because they're really good at something that
Speaker 1: you're not, because they might have big, huge blind spots
Speaker 1: and things that you're rarely well aware of, very well
Speaker 1: versed in. There's a given a take for everything, right,
Speaker 1: there's something that you can provide that's of use and value,
Speaker 1: and there's something that they can. So let them do
Speaker 1: the things that they're good at. You do the things
Speaker 1: that you're good at. And that's why there's more than
Speaker 1: one people, more than one person, because that way everybody
Speaker 1: has an opportunity to focus on the thing that they're
Speaker 1: good at. Because that what he just did there was sad, sad,
Speaker 1: really defensive technology.
Speaker 2: Two more will pop up in its place. And it's
Speaker 2: worth pointing out that I have absolutely no problem with
Speaker 2: my license plate being identifiable or readable by law enforcement
Speaker 2: officers or even the person driving behind me. I don't
Speaker 2: even have a problem with police using license plate readers
Speaker 2: mounted on their vehicles. Driving a two ton vehicle that
Speaker 2: is capable of going well over one hundred miles per
Speaker 2: hour on a public roadway or a parking lot is
Speaker 2: a pretty big responsibility in privilege anywhere in the United States.
Speaker 1: If lawn fall, you just call traveling at privilege. Whoa
Speaker 1: wouch wants.
Speaker 2: To track your location via phone for a prolonged period
Speaker 2: or even pin you beyond a single cell phone tower,
Speaker 2: They are required to have a good reason for it,
Speaker 2: and an elected judge needs to agree that it's a
Speaker 2: good enough reason by granting them a warrant. This was argued, debated,
Speaker 2: and decided by the Supreme Court in a landmark ruling
Speaker 2: from the twenty eighteen case Carpenter versus United.
Speaker 1: States Times Look look a bunch of oy vays, including
Speaker 1: what's her name? Ruth ben A Ginsbury, damp Data dar
Speaker 1: Darth Beta Ginsburg.
Speaker 19: Provides an intimate window into a person's life, revealing not
Speaker 19: only his particular movements, but through them, his familial, political, professional, religious,
Speaker 19: and sexual associations.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 19: These location records quote hold for many Americans the privacies
Speaker 19: of life.
Speaker 2: So what would be reason gone assume that tracking someone's
Speaker 2: location with AI without a warrant would be a violation
Speaker 2: of their Fourth Amendment right right. Well, that has not
Speaker 2: been ruled on yet, and if they agree that it's
Speaker 2: a constitutional violation, they'll be leading the flock Safety unicorn
Speaker 2: out of its eight billion dollar stable and shooting it
Speaker 2: right in the head. And considering the combined ninety two
Speaker 2: million dollar lobbying effort of flock Safety in their primary investor,
Speaker 2: maybe it's not so confusing why nobody will straighten this
Speaker 2: whole constitutional rights thing out. My point that's taking forever
Speaker 2: to get to is I have no idea if using
Speaker 2: adversarial nooise to confuse AI tracking system is legal or
Speaker 2: not in your state. For this reason, if you are
Speaker 2: inspired by this video or this information, I would advise
Speaker 2: and ask that you use that inspiration to research this
Speaker 2: type of technology. And I would not advise or ask
Speaker 2: that you immediately screenprint or place a Matt sticker on
Speaker 2: your license plate, because you very well could be the
Speaker 2: one that they make an example out of. I want
Speaker 2: to talk today about my love affair.
Speaker 1: With this note. Yeah, I'm still battling about this. Let's
Speaker 1: say there's it.
Speaker 2: Over expressions and sentiment while standing in line at Walmart.
Speaker 2: Aren't being bundled with them and then least to law enforcement.
Speaker 2: Since the boom of the Internet in the nineteen nineties,
Speaker 2: the date those rules if they want respect it, and
Speaker 2: this provides the framework for similars that I recommend and
Speaker 2: I'll link boil. Everywhere in the European Union, your data
Speaker 2: privacy is treated and recognized as a fundamental human right.
Speaker 2: Their General Protection regulation requires YouTube and the EU give
Speaker 2: on man implicitly.
Speaker 1: There's a cover story that's like the service level before.
Speaker 2: Your personal data can be logged or collected, and this
Speaker 2: provides a framework for similar protections in the UK, Japan, Brazil, Argentina, Switzerland,
Speaker 2: South Korea, Canada, India, even China and so on. And
Speaker 2: in the majority of these countries, these protections are extra territorial,
Speaker 2: meaning that even though Google or Facebook are American companies
Speaker 2: or services, they'll need to become and remain compliant to
Speaker 2: those rules if they want to continue doing business in
Speaker 2: those countries.
Speaker 1: They believe in the pieces of paper that aren't enflorenced.
Speaker 1: Apparently at leasy does.
Speaker 2: There is no reasonable need to try and disrupt license
Speaker 2: plate readers in these places, because your health information, your
Speaker 2: social media activity, your facial expressions and sentiment while standing
Speaker 2: in line at Walmart aren't being bundled with them, and
Speaker 2: then least to law enforcement.
Speaker 1: Since the boom, yeah, they are.
Speaker 2: The Internet. In the nineteen nineties, the dangers of personal
Speaker 2: data brokerage became very apparent to just about all of us,
Speaker 2: and everyone from sociologists to data scientists to concern taxpayers
Speaker 2: begged legislators to protect them, and even after stolen data
Speaker 2: was used to manipulate and subvert democracy in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: another decade passed without any meaningful protection from the federal government.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I guess we'll just can dii wyatt hey
Speaker 2: video editing ben here. If you're a law enforcement officer,
Speaker 2: or if you work for a law enforcement agency.
Speaker 1: Or I have are good. I think he just plays
Speaker 1: to cook there for a little bit. All right, let's
Speaker 1: say you for yeavers any eversving displacing camera feeds is
Speaker 1: classic haaking. Oh yeah, yeah, I dreammember, I think it was, Yeah,
Speaker 1: for sure, he says. Hi spy hunter says, hickvision is
Speaker 1: the absolute worst security I've ever come across in the wild.
Speaker 1: I look that you said that, he says, I know
Speaker 1: how to do all this shit and that says most
Speaker 1: people don't change the default passwords. Right, Hey, hey, hey,
Speaker 1: some people, if if VCRs weren't weren't out of date,
Speaker 1: there there would still be a Flashing twelve in their
Speaker 1: house somewhere. Support the goddamn show, everybody, thanks, All right,
Speaker 1: let's go to I hope this doesn't start on its own. Now, okay,
Speaker 1: we're good. Uh, let's go to this jack of burru here.
Speaker 1: Who's this asshole?
Speaker 20: Oh?
Speaker 7: It's me.
Speaker 1: Loving it got to build up thick skid. The planet
Speaker 1: is genius. That's the problem. Nothing happens online that isn't
Speaker 1: being watched. That's why online was created, so that they
Speaker 1: could pattern your behaviors, map them out, and influence them
Speaker 1: and mold them. That's what influence. That's what social media.
Speaker 1: That's what the whole freaking Internet thing was the purpose for.
Speaker 1: That was their sorcery. They created it. It wasn't the mistake.
Speaker 1: Oh they didn't know how the Internet was going to
Speaker 1: shut up. Now, everything that's controlled, it's in the controlled system.
Speaker 1: You're not working outside the boundary lines. Is Everything that
Speaker 1: happens is in this computer space is still not in reality.
Speaker 1: It's in hyper reality LARPing. So you're not getting outside
Speaker 1: of the panopticon prison. You're still in the fish bowl.
Speaker 1: Just creating a different type of distraction that's more entertaining
Speaker 1: to someone else than a different type of distraction would
Speaker 1: be suitable for someone else. You're helping them create new
Speaker 1: distractions that take people away from advancing their resistance against
Speaker 1: that system, which is slowly cloar sing on to them
Speaker 1: like a python or a constrictor isn't that the same thing?
Speaker 1: Most people have completely lost the ability of having any
Speaker 1: type of critical thinking skills due to the end those
Speaker 1: poisons and propaganda. Yes, humanity is on that extinction shit
Speaker 1: right now, and these evil folks will know it. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: by the way, everybody just say, you know, why is
Speaker 1: this one here? What's that? I don't know what that was?
Speaker 1: What was that one doing there? Any right? No, dover
Speaker 1: know what that won't? Oh die? D Lego mightgo is
Speaker 1: here and Mike Garlet is here. No stop, I saw
Speaker 1: already archangel obviously. All right, you guys can always press
Speaker 1: this thing and then go we do and then send
Speaker 1: that out, or you can hit the subscribe button here bam,
Speaker 1: bam bam, all right, cool, eks, no, we want part two. This,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna try to get it. I'm gonna try to
Speaker 1: fit it in phrazing, phraezing. This is good, though I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have to comment on a few times, but this
Speaker 1: is good. Let's get it started already, goddamn it. And uh,
Speaker 1: let me do this real quick because I had yeah
Speaker 1: stand up for a moment. Where am I at?
Speaker 4: Hey?
Speaker 1: Where is it there is? Okay, see, I just faded away.
Speaker 1: That's an effect. It wasn't a very impressive effect, but
Speaker 1: it was still an effect.
Speaker 21: Okay, all right, Hi, this is Crystal and welcome to Dreaming.
Speaker 1: You didn't miss shit in part two. Just a bunch
Speaker 1: of biblical babbling bullshit.
Speaker 3: So the title of today's video is AI and Our
Speaker 3: Future Part two. Now this is a continuation on front.
Speaker 1: Of a part one. I bet thanks on the.
Speaker 3: Fur box if you'd like to go back and watch that. Now,
Speaker 3: having said that, I have a lot to cover, so
Speaker 3: we're going to jump up to excuse the extra.
Speaker 1: Sound, and this is going to be annoying as fox.
Speaker 1: So we're going to pass this minority report thing. Have
Speaker 1: you seen minority Report? Do you know what happens? Okay,
Speaker 1: because she puts a bleep beep beep, clipp zipping all
Speaker 1: throughout it so that the copyright doesn't hit it, and
Speaker 1: she has copyright fair use over the top of it.
Speaker 1: So it's very it's very irritating. But this is pre
Speaker 1: crime shit, right, and this is basically what the point
Speaker 1: of this all is. But I'm going to past this
Speaker 1: part because it's super throw their.
Speaker 3: Plans, even if it's disguised as fiction. Well, this predictive
Speaker 3: AI is no longer fiction. It is now and it
Speaker 3: is our reality. Introducing Gideon, your AI powered threat protection Now.
Speaker 3: As per the snippet on the top right, Gideon is
Speaker 3: a proactive AI assistant that bridges intent and execution. It
Speaker 3: doesn't just talk, It gets things done. Gideon learns your habits.
Speaker 1: And it's part of scannery. Do you want to take
Speaker 1: a look at that later? I want to do it now.
Speaker 1: Let's do it now, let's se where is it? Boom
Speaker 1: boom oh yeah. We have to talk about the the
Speaker 1: Soo group as well, the Cenoso group of the whole
Speaker 1: sneaky thing in there, because it's a serpent called get
Speaker 1: it and as really firm is known for creating spy
Speaker 1: we're like pegasusts, but does not directly associated with hardware
Speaker 1: or software using typical smart city camera systems. For bullshit.
Speaker 1: That's them lying to me when I asked him a question.
Speaker 1: This is scanary. Get the fuck off of me, Times
Speaker 1: of Israel, Jesus Chris. All right, so this scanary, like
Speaker 1: canary in the coal mine says it's radar based tech
Speaker 1: developed by a former radar engineer of Iron Dome. Of
Speaker 1: Iron Dome can't screen twenty five thousand people per hour
Speaker 1: to detect threats and stadiums, transit hubs and airports, right
Speaker 1: unarmed people that they want to murder and claim that
Speaker 1: they did something. Oh look, he's got it. Can you
Speaker 1: know how easy it is to fake this shit? Like yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe they can detects the most the most paranoid schizophrenic
Speaker 1: people on the planet. But let's just say, for instance,
Speaker 1: they don't like you and they like to play the
Speaker 1: victim occasionally. Why wouldn't they just have the system readout
Speaker 1: lies so that they could pick off a freaking student
Speaker 1: because he's a whatever Palestinian or Aguay. Oh no, look,
Speaker 1: our security system has detected that he has a gun.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, they all have guns, mow him down,
Speaker 1: mow them down. Oh, thank god we got rid of
Speaker 1: that Threat's fucking nothing in there. Oh oh's AI had
Speaker 1: another one of those hallucinations. Oopsie, sorry about your kids.
Speaker 1: They don't give a shit, And then it's all plausible deniability.
Speaker 1: It was we were told it was a threat by
Speaker 1: the AI. Security at public, publicly crowded places, from busy
Speaker 1: airport terminals to open air venues and stadiums is one
Speaker 1: of the main bottlenecks for long lines, delays, and disruptions.
Speaker 1: So they're standing there and you're like, oh, look at me.
Speaker 1: I'm so smart, I can detect which and says bitch,
Speaker 1: They checked bags anyway, asking individuals to stop from some
Speaker 1: of their clothing and belongings and passed walk through security
Speaker 1: scanning stations and pedes, traffic flu and imports, and other
Speaker 1: highly populated venues such as stadium shopping, maills, bus and
Speaker 1: translations in school. So now let's just irradiate everybody and
Speaker 1: take away all of their fucking privacy. That sounds wonderful,
Speaker 1: Oi fay, She says, for forty five minutes straight, what
Speaker 1: if you could significantly reduce the time and hassle it
Speaker 1: takes for people to arrive at their seats at a
Speaker 1: mass venue such as a concert or sports stadium, from
Speaker 1: the moment they parked their car. Oh great, Yes, So
Speaker 1: you're being punished and treated like an enemy and guilty
Speaker 1: before proven guilty until proven innocent, from the time you
Speaker 1: show up to pay your fucking money, or because you
Speaker 1: already paid your money for an expensive ticket to be someplace.
Speaker 1: Now you're being surveilled and you consented that by paying
Speaker 1: for your ticket and parking where you did. Isn't that
Speaker 1: something while ensuring public safety? This is the goal of
Speaker 1: Israeli startup Scinary. The Tel Aviv based startup came out
Speaker 1: of stealth this week with a mass security human screening
Speaker 1: system led by doctor Gideon Levita, a former chief radar
Speaker 1: engineer at Rafael Advanced Defensive Systems, where he helped the
Speaker 1: other guy's name is Cohen. We'll talk about that guy
Speaker 1: in a second, oddly enough named Cohen, where he helped
Speaker 1: develop Israel's Iron Dome air defense that only works when
Speaker 1: they wanted to and conveniently doesn't work when they want
Speaker 1: people to be murdered, so they can cry victim and
Speaker 1: murder people for two years straight since last October, since
Speaker 1: two octobers ago, yeah yeah, yeah, as well as the
Speaker 1: Trophy system designed to protect tanks and other armored vehicles
Speaker 1: from missiles and rockets. The idea for the startup originated
Speaker 1: in developing technology to help prevent terror attacks in open spaces,
Speaker 1: venues and transportation huse which were more frequent in the
Speaker 1: nineteen nineties and issue. Well, you know, if I just
Speaker 1: wish they were as cheap as people said they were,
Speaker 1: because then they wouldn't want to spend the money on
Speaker 1: the AMMO to murder people. That's like fifty cents around
Speaker 1: even in bind in bulk right. The patented radar based
Speaker 1: screening technology vows to secure crowded places such as airport,
Speaker 1: stadiums and shopping malls without the need to stop visitors
Speaker 1: at tedious checkpoints. Blah blah blah. Oh, look at the
Speaker 1: convenience convenience of being you know, radiated and having your
Speaker 1: balls fall off. That's great. It's not like we don't
Speaker 1: have enough sources of the cancer going on here. And
Speaker 1: why not with similar radiation? I said, why not? That's
Speaker 1: a current security screening methods are simply not working well enough.
Speaker 1: You son of a bitch scnary CEO and co founder
Speaker 1: Ronan Yashwitz. Yeah, he's definitely not Irish. Told the Times
Speaker 1: of Israel there are growing challenges in public spaces like airports, terminals,
Speaker 1: retail centers, and transportation hubs. You know, they're not talking
Speaker 1: about Israel. They're talking about the fucking world that they're
Speaker 1: gonna sell the shit to, and that the already is
Speaker 1: not even matter selling it, because that's going again into
Speaker 1: the idea that there's a separation between this and the
Speaker 1: corporate pocracy that runs us. It's just about implementation. It's
Speaker 1: probably already there. Oh how to detect oh, I say,
Speaker 1: on how to detect threats effectively without disturbing people's movements?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, all right, exactly, just shoot beams of energy
Speaker 1: through them instead. But you get the idea, right, Oh
Speaker 1: my god, Look at this. The system deploys two centers
Speaker 1: that face each other from a distance of up to
Speaker 1: ten meters, which just so happens to be thirty three
Speaker 1: feet three three to detect concealed weapons, even if they
Speaker 1: are beneath clothes or in pockets on the human body. Yes,
Speaker 1: the system can be seamlessly integrated into existing security infrastructures
Speaker 1: such as CCTV cameras. That creates a scanning area of
Speaker 1: two hundred square meters. Once a person enters the scanning zone,
Speaker 1: they're going to be irradiated until they get out of
Speaker 1: that zone because it's not going to leave them. It's
Speaker 1: going to constantly be checking and checking and checking until
Speaker 1: they are no longer in the geo fencing map of
Speaker 1: where they were. It triggers the radar, and as the
Speaker 1: radar as the person walks, ten images per second per
Speaker 1: person are generated. He said, yes, great, great, more for
Speaker 1: identifying markers for later number don't don't you have to?
Speaker 1: I was in an impression that, you know, gathering data
Speaker 1: on you for not doing anything wrong and not being
Speaker 1: guilty of a crime was also a Fourth Amendment violation.
Speaker 1: I remember that when that was a thing. Joshres noted
Speaker 1: that the scans are completed in less than two seconds.
Speaker 1: The aive powered up. Yeah, it looks like a giant
Speaker 1: freaking what they call it X ray machine. Awesome. Once
Speaker 1: a dangerous item is identified and immediate alert is sent
Speaker 1: to the security personnel, the system is tailored to identify firearms,
Speaker 1: hand guns, and rifles. I revise explosive devices and hyrotechnics
Speaker 1: such as flares and fire crackers, as well as knives
Speaker 1: and other sharp items. I believe that we will be
Speaker 1: a game changer, that we will be a game changer
Speaker 1: and identifying pyrotechnics with the rise of the use of
Speaker 1: pyrotechnics as soccer matches. Right, Who does this in the
Speaker 1: first place? Who creates these things and then says we
Speaker 1: need to go fix it? Same fucking people, right, okay?
Speaker 1: Or if not, they hand something that they've made sure
Speaker 1: works themselves because they built it, and says, here a
Speaker 1: crazy person, won't you go do that? And they go
Speaker 1: do it, and then hey, look now we have an
Speaker 1: excuse to go more despotic on you, more tyrannical, because
Speaker 1: we have to save you from yourselves and these evil
Speaker 1: monsters that wouldn't even existed if we didn't keep giving
Speaker 1: them things to plow you up with. Is this thing
Speaker 1: following me? You're the fuck out of here?
Speaker 3: All right?
Speaker 1: That's it. It's a long article. I didn't really go
Speaker 1: through the whole thing because it's annoying and it's like
Speaker 1: literally Jewish. Alright, so we'll look at this long there
Speaker 1: time Social net open source Okay, Social Net and shadow Dragon.
Speaker 1: Keep those ideas, keep those names in mind. So we'll
Speaker 1: talk about the Cyanides to Ravalcates and why that matters
Speaker 1: in a second. But I think we kind of already did.
Speaker 1: I thought there was one more in here, but I
Speaker 1: guess I guess I'm an idiot. Okay, we'll worry Gideon, Gideop. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's more on Gideon. I must have cut closed them
Speaker 1: out already.
Speaker 3: Lips understands your thoughts and relentlessly moves every task start
Speaker 3: to done. Now, don't get fooled by the name. Gideon
Speaker 3: is not Biblical at all. The logo shows you it
Speaker 3: is a Roman form of governing. This has all come
Speaker 3: about due to recent attacks that have taken place in
Speaker 3: the US.
Speaker 1: She misses a lot of things here, so just be
Speaker 1: and she doesn't say jew very often either. Okay, it's
Speaker 1: a Roman form because he put good picture on it.
Speaker 1: I mean, obviously that's a Trojan, all right, it's a okay,
Speaker 1: all right, if that's the limit of your you're you know,
Speaker 1: it's a Roman gladiator, whatever fuck it is, it's a
Speaker 1: Roman whatever, Storm Couber, it doesn't matter. Sentinel, just because
Speaker 1: it's part of the pressure. Yeah, that's it's totally Roman,
Speaker 1: even though he's a big fat Jew, right, Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: I mean there's also the whole idea, like I've been seeing,
Speaker 1: is that they're both one and the same because of
Speaker 1: the lineage in the history of Romulus and Remiss and
Speaker 1: the whole idea and the story behind Rome. They were
Speaker 1: Saturn cult as well for the very for the most part.
Speaker 1: There were a whole lot of others that were none
Speaker 1: of that. They were the myth ray and Sun cult,
Speaker 1: which were told We're told our pagan and bad and polytheistic,
Speaker 1: and also the nonsense lies that was the more pure
Speaker 1: form of the Gothic Aryan culture culture, and the Sun worship,
Speaker 1: which was a benevolent creator. If you worship a be
Speaker 1: of a creator, or if you have a belief in
Speaker 1: a benevolent creator't you want to be benevolent yourself and
Speaker 1: fair and just and honorable. Aren't those all the traits
Speaker 1: that you would aspire to be to be? Like you're now,
Speaker 1: if you have a demonic, psychopathic demon as your guy,
Speaker 1: and you know in your your CEO, of your of
Speaker 1: your religion, you have different you have different values of
Speaker 1: the lack thereof you have different goals. This is just
Speaker 1: like common sense, right, and the church and all that
Speaker 1: stuff that was there. There was a very deep Roman
Speaker 1: roots in this cult, but this was an afterthought of
Speaker 1: cult that was long long before that, and some of
Speaker 1: those people weren't all that collection of Semitic ethnicity even
Speaker 1: back then. But they did go they didn't go on
Speaker 1: to found found Rome. And they have the the wolf
Speaker 1: that they're suckling from the wolf as in the Wolf cult.
Speaker 1: They were that part of the separate wolf cult tribe.
Speaker 1: They weren't the sorcerers, the Roman collective of the Roman
Speaker 1: body wasn't, but they were part of the other the
Speaker 1: ones that were directly involved in protecting the sorcerer.
Speaker 3: Class in a tweet millennia tribe.
Speaker 1: And they carried that out in Rome as they were
Speaker 1: doing the bidding of the Sanhedrin.
Speaker 3: Right hold for pre emptive intervention. What is pre emptive intervention?
Speaker 3: It is exactly like what we just watched in that
Speaker 3: Minority Report trailer. We're going to watch a short new
Speaker 3: segment that features these gideons own Aaron Cohen.
Speaker 22: Aaron Cohen retired LAPD Lieutenant Mark Evans and functioned his
Speaker 22: contributor and former FBI special Agent Nicole Parker.
Speaker 2: It's great to have you on. It's a sad night
Speaker 2: to do this, Nicole. I want to start with you first.
Speaker 22: I want to see the FBI Director Cash Battel posted
Speaker 22: this on x quoting here, the FBI is investigating this
Speaker 22: shooting as an act of domestic terrorism and hate crime
Speaker 22: targeting Catholics.
Speaker 10: Is he right, Nicole? Is this a hate crime?
Speaker 4: In your opinion?
Speaker 23: I think that's an understatement. I think this is a
Speaker 23: hate crime and a lot more. And I appreciate that
Speaker 23: Cash Btel is stepping in and saying, you know what,
Speaker 23: let's look at this as a federal crime. Obviously, the
Speaker 23: shooter is deceased, a self inflicted gunshot wound, but it
Speaker 23: is so important that the FBI.
Speaker 1: So this is what I gotta get up to go
Speaker 1: use the restroom, But now I have to yell at
Speaker 1: how fucking retarded this whole thing is hate crime. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just just tee it up for the jew that's going
Speaker 1: to come in here and start screaming about how awesome
Speaker 1: Gideon is and how he could have prevented it, and
Speaker 1: how hate crime is somehow a thing, and that this
Speaker 1: thing wasn't contrived in the first place by Carrot Like
Speaker 1: Carrot Top did all this right, It wasn't that he
Speaker 1: was He was encouraged or supplied with any of the idea,
Speaker 1: the motivations, the pharmaceutical psychiatric drugs that made it more
Speaker 1: easy for him, the transitional freaking hormonal problems that he
Speaker 1: was having. Right, that wasn't just a recipe or a
Speaker 1: formula that we created somebody to at least be at
Speaker 1: Patsy at the very least. And if you did press
Speaker 1: a trigger, then I'm sure there was a whole that's
Speaker 1: what they call it, like a safety net or a
Speaker 1: contingency plan where if he's a shitty shot, there'll be
Speaker 1: somebody around to plug a few kids so that they
Speaker 1: can get the desired result out of their public ritual here.
Speaker 1: So again, these murderous sons of bitches are going to
Speaker 1: go out and kill children so that they can sell
Speaker 1: you something that's supposed to protect children. And the whole
Speaker 1: Sea Sam thing is a bunch of bullshit too. That's
Speaker 1: what they want you to age verify now for things
Speaker 1: on the internet because they're protecting you from child's sex
Speaker 1: abusive material or or protects all for the children, the
Speaker 1: same children that you've been stealing from their parents, the
Speaker 1: same children that you steal from their parents, if they
Speaker 1: are diagnosed with cancer by some fucking sorcerer and a
Speaker 1: white coat, and they have a better way of fixing them.
Speaker 1: Because cancer is just a fucking word. It doesn't mean
Speaker 1: you need chemo and radiation just means you need to
Speaker 1: figure out what the hell your deficiencies are and maybe
Speaker 1: fix that and write your ship or if you need
Speaker 1: a parasite clans something said. All the mds will never
Speaker 1: do those things because that will cure the person, but
Speaker 1: they'll take your child away. So these are the same
Speaker 1: people who buy and sell children, who murder them, who
Speaker 1: rape them to death, who rip off their faces and
Speaker 1: wear them. These are the ones that are selling to
Speaker 1: you right now. Why you need to be under total
Speaker 1: surveillance at all times. It's for the children, right for
Speaker 1: your children, literally that think of the verbiage there. It'll
Speaker 1: be very hard for you to protect them when they
Speaker 1: are surveilling you twenty four to seven and know the
Speaker 1: moment you blink right when to snatch your child, or
Speaker 1: they can set you up with some bullshit and take them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's great. Yeah, it's definitely for the children, for acquiring them,
Speaker 1: not for protecting I.
Speaker 23: Steps in and discovers how this happened and investigates it
Speaker 23: as a hate crime or possible domestic terrorists.
Speaker 22: Yeah, it's amazing to me because I want to put
Speaker 22: this up the Minneapolis police chief.
Speaker 1: He just look at the glare top right. Look at
Speaker 1: the fucking glare in this guy's eyes. This is Crazy
Speaker 1: Cohen over here. He's a goddamn mental patient, but obviously
Speaker 1: they all are. He's just chomping at the bit right here.
Speaker 1: He might as well be doing his Chicaina rocking. Right
Speaker 1: is his dry humping of the air for the Chakaina
Speaker 1: feminine energy. You know, Ay, it's feminine energy because Elle
Speaker 1: was a freaking female and it was a matriarchal cult
Speaker 1: of the serpents. That's why he gave a.
Speaker 22: Couple of news conferences today Aaron Cohen and some pretty
Speaker 22: compelling information along the way. He said the following here,
Speaker 22: I want to get your take on this.
Speaker 24: We're also aware of a manifesto that the shooter had
Speaker 24: time to be released on YouTube. This manifesto appeared to
Speaker 24: show him at the scene and included some disturbing writings.
Speaker 24: That content has since been taken down with the assistance
Speaker 24: of the FBI, and it now remains under active review
Speaker 24: by our investigators.
Speaker 2: So he clearly planned this.
Speaker 22: He had the manifesto going live on YouTube at a
Speaker 22: certain time. Clearly there was some thought that went into
Speaker 22: this era. I mean, and nobody was tipped off.
Speaker 25: This is one hundred percent domestic terrorism.
Speaker 2: Will tell you why. Trace.
Speaker 25: This is ideologically motivated, This was tactical, and this was intentional.
Speaker 25: Eighty percent of these domestic lone wolf terrorists post some
Speaker 25: type of grievance online. Matthew Crooks nine hundred posts between
Speaker 25: twenty twenty and twenty twenty two. The DC shooter nine
Speaker 25: hundred page manifesto one hundred percent domestic terrorism. And I
Speaker 25: bet you in addition to that manifesto, there's a very
Speaker 25: significant breadcrumb daisy trail leading back. Who knows how many weeks, months,
Speaker 25: or even years. This is the new face of terrorism.
Speaker 25: This is no longer post nine to eleven terror organized
Speaker 25: Al Qaeda.
Speaker 10: Trace.
Speaker 25: These are online loan wolves and the United States is
Speaker 25: ten years behind these threats.
Speaker 10: We need to catch up.
Speaker 22: And I wanted to get your opinion on the breaking
Speaker 22: news here because the first lady Meladi and Trump just
Speaker 22: called for more and this is quoting here preemptive intervention
Speaker 22: when it comes to iding school shooters.
Speaker 2: It's kind of your.
Speaker 25: Bailey Wick era Trace, as you know, correct one hundred percent,
Speaker 25: and she's one hundred percent correct. I am now about
Speaker 25: to launch Gideon, America's first ever AI threat detection platform,
Speaker 25: built specifically for law enforcement. It scrapes the Internet twenty
Speaker 25: four to seven, using in Israeli great ontology to pull
Speaker 25: specific threat language and then routes it to local law enforcement.
Speaker 25: It's a twenty four to seven detective. It never sleeps,
Speaker 25: and it's going to get us in front of these attacks.
Speaker 2: What did have picked up on this?
Speaker 3: To you?
Speaker 25: One hundred percent?
Speaker 5: I wish this.
Speaker 25: I wish my program would already be up. We're not
Speaker 25: launching until next week. I've got a dozen agencies on
Speaker 25: board TRACE. I just onloaded a major Northeast agency with
Speaker 25: over twenty seven hundred sworn. This is America's early warning system.
Speaker 3: Like Minority Report, Gideon would have picked up on this
Speaker 3: school shooting and stopped it before it happened. Sounds really good, Hey,
Speaker 3: I wonder what would then happen to the shooter. If
Speaker 3: this was the case, would he have been killed for
Speaker 3: pre crime like Tom Cruise was ordered to do?
Speaker 10: Well?
Speaker 3: If the system can't be wrong, then I guess if
Speaker 3: the AI said that they would continue to try and
Speaker 3: murder people, then yes, they would be killed based on
Speaker 3: crimes that they have not yet committed. Now, Gideon isn't
Speaker 3: the only pre predictive AI program, Shadow Dragon and Social
Speaker 3: net is another one. Again, the devil is in the details,
Speaker 3: or should I say the dragon is in the details.
Speaker 3: This AI that never sleeps has access to social media accounts,
Speaker 3: geographical locations, friends lists, plus much much more. Don't ever
Speaker 3: be fooled to think that your account is private. AI
Speaker 3: is not human, so therefore it is in a league
Speaker 3: of its own when it comes to accessing so called
Speaker 3: private information. What I want us all to remember is
Speaker 3: something called the Hegelian dialectic. As per the diagram on
Speaker 3: the screen, the government's agenda sits at the top. Now,
Speaker 3: to achieve this agenda, one must create a problem in
Speaker 3: order to get a reaction to then bring in a
Speaker 3: pre planned solution. For example, the problem could be multiple shootings.
Speaker 3: People would then start reacting due to the fear and
Speaker 3: propaganda that's spread through news outlets and social media. They
Speaker 3: would then beg for their governments to save them. The
Speaker 3: solution disarm the people, bring in pre empty AI programs,
Speaker 3: and surveil the citizens twenty four to seven. This is
Speaker 3: also known as a SCIO or social engineering. What is
Speaker 3: social engineering? Social engineering is the term used for a
Speaker 3: broad range of malicious activities accomplished through human interactions. It
Speaker 3: uses psychological manipulation to trick users into making security mistakes
Speaker 3: or giving away their sensitive information or According to the
Speaker 3: American Dictionary, it is also the use of propaganda by
Speaker 3: a government to sway perceptions and attitudes of its own citizens.
Speaker 3: In other words, mind control psyops are military actions designed
Speaker 3: to influence the perceptions and attitudes of individuals, groups, and
Speaker 3: foreign governments. It was like, you've Noah Harari who said
Speaker 3: that you basically don't even have your own thoughts anymore. Now,
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that bad things like murders don't happen organically,
Speaker 3: but I am saying that not all of these things
Speaker 3: that you see on the news are real. In fact,
Speaker 3: most real murders don't even make it onto the national news,
Speaker 3: let alone international news.
Speaker 1: Okay, there's a difference between real and planned and executed,
Speaker 1: like did it was it orchestrated? Was it influenced? Was
Speaker 1: it by artificial or unnatural means? Pushed to happen? That's
Speaker 1: not the same as saying people didn't die. So when
Speaker 1: you see fake, that's really who you're taking a big
Speaker 1: leap that you don't need to take. It's not necessarily
Speaker 1: or required as long as you understand that someone else
Speaker 1: is setting this up who and these people hate hate life,
Speaker 1: they hate human life, they hate children, they hate innocence.
Speaker 1: Any opportunity that they could use to blame someone else
Speaker 1: for their actions by proxy, they're going to take it,
Speaker 1: and they're going to really do it. The fake part
Speaker 1: comes from the motivation. Who was propping this person up
Speaker 1: and conditioning them and egging them on, Who was providing
Speaker 1: what they needed to carry it out? And if they
Speaker 1: didn't they chickened out, or if they decided that they
Speaker 1: had a moral moral compass all of a sudden and
Speaker 1: they don't execute on it, they will still be there
Speaker 1: unseen to kill. And then all these people seem to
Speaker 1: either be programmed to blow their fucking heads off afterward,
Speaker 1: or they have their heads blown off, and since they
Speaker 1: control the crime, since they are the ones doing the investigating,
Speaker 1: it always comes out like suicide. So let's say you
Speaker 1: got somebody already there. They're supposed to be the star
Speaker 1: of the show and go kill children. See that part
Speaker 1: is staged because it's been staged to happen, But it
Speaker 1: doesn't mean it's staged as in its artificial. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: somebody put real bullets in the gun. Basically, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. If you're on a movie set, it's
Speaker 1: not exactly a movie. If you can't do another take
Speaker 1: because you're dead, you follow me, doesn't mean it wasn't orchestrated.
Speaker 1: Just means that, you know, the real people can still
Speaker 1: die and often do they need blood for the fucking
Speaker 1: ritual excuse my language.
Speaker 3: Only the ones that they want to manufacture for the
Speaker 3: purpose of their social engineering. They're the only ones that
Speaker 3: actually make it onto the news. Now, talking about social engineering,
Speaker 3: I'm going to show you the current agenda here in
Speaker 3: Australia in regards to digital ID and biometric tracking, so
Speaker 3: you can see how these current sciops have paid the
Speaker 3: way for a complete digital dictatorship.
Speaker 16: An ID check before you search the web, could soon
Speaker 16: be the new norm as Australian government seeks to add
Speaker 16: further protections for children online. The Asafety Commissioner is introducing
Speaker 16: a new industry code forcing search engines like Google and
Speaker 16: Microsoft to verify a person's age and filter the contents accordingly.
Speaker 26: Want to serve the web, first, You'll have to prove
Speaker 26: how old you are. It's the way of the future.
Speaker 26: With e Safety Commissioner introducing age checks for search engines.
Speaker 23: This is really going to be quite a widespread change
Speaker 23: that will affect most people searching habits.
Speaker 26: It's part of a new online safety code, much like
Speaker 26: the already social media age limits, meaning ozzis will need
Speaker 26: to prove their age when they sign in to a
Speaker 26: search engine account like Google or Microsoft. For those logged
Speaker 26: in users under eighteen, the search results will filter out pornography,
Speaker 26: high impact violence and self harm material.
Speaker 5: You can circumvent age checking by using a VPN.
Speaker 26: Plus there's always the option of just not logging in. Still,
Speaker 26: big tech companies will be forced to age check through
Speaker 26: photo ID, face scanning, age estimation tools, credit card checks,
Speaker 26: digital ID, parent or guardian consent, stored data or third
Speaker 26: party verification and that expert say has its own risks.
Speaker 13: If biometric data is use as part of an identity
Speaker 13: verification process and.
Speaker 3: It goes out into the while it's irrecoverable, it can't
Speaker 3: be replaced.
Speaker 26: The new rules will come in in December.
Speaker 3: I think the critical question is is this the solution.
Speaker 26: Those companies who flout the rules face fines of almost
Speaker 26: fifty million dollars per breach.
Speaker 3: Samaragardner ten, let's bring the headlines I have on the
Speaker 3: screen here, face age and ID checks using the Internet
Speaker 3: in Australia is about to fundamentally change. Age verification is
Speaker 3: coming to search engines in Australia. YouTube's new AI age
Speaker 3: verification is coming soon. Here is what's going to change.
Speaker 3: So my YouTube channel may be deleted if I refuse
Speaker 3: to upload my license or prove who I am now
Speaker 3: it may not either because they can with AI, they
Speaker 3: can read my voice and use voice recognition to try
Speaker 3: and determine my age. But you can see where this
Speaker 3: is going next. It says Australia is quiet introducing unprecedented
Speaker 3: age checks for search engines like Google. Yes, in Australia,
Speaker 3: users who are logged into search engines like Google will
Speaker 3: soon be required to verify their age. This is part
Speaker 3: of a new Online Safety Code designed to limit children's
Speaker 3: exposure to harmful online content such as pornography. So what's
Speaker 3: the agenda. The agenda is for every Australian to have
Speaker 3: a digital ID so they can track everybody's digital footprint
Speaker 3: twenty four seven. Now, if we apply the Hegelian dialectic principle,
Speaker 3: we can see that the problem is that the children
Speaker 3: can access porn and violent material, etc. Yes, I am
Speaker 3: not dismissing that this is a real problem. But rather
Speaker 3: than removing these types of websites from the Internet or
Speaker 3: having a digital ID just to access these types of websites,
Speaker 3: instead they choose to roll it out for everything. This
Speaker 3: is how you know that there is more to this
Speaker 3: agenda than that. Now what's the reaction. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 3: We need to protect the children at all costs. Everybody
Speaker 3: has to have a digital ID. We've got to do
Speaker 3: whatever it takes. So that was the solution, Make everybody
Speaker 3: have a digital ID. Because that is the solution that
Speaker 3: the government has put forward. The agenda is complete. Now
Speaker 3: I want to warn you about how deceptive the enemy
Speaker 3: is going to be when it comes to you getting
Speaker 3: a digital ID. Now, I want to talk to you
Speaker 3: about something that happened to my brother just within the
Speaker 3: last fortnight.
Speaker 1: He called up, just in a fortnight. I'm right here.
Speaker 1: She gets a couple things wrong. You know, sometimes I
Speaker 1: would say thesis, antithesis and synthesis instead of Roum reaction
Speaker 1: solution seems a lot well leans that way.
Speaker 3: To cancel his mobile phone service. Now for them to
Speaker 3: cancel this service, they asked him to upload a photo
Speaker 3: of his driver's license. Once he had done that, they
Speaker 3: then asked for him to upload a photo of himself
Speaker 3: so that they could verify that he was the same
Speaker 3: person that was on the license. Now, after he did this,
Speaker 3: his phone started flashing with all these different colored negative
Speaker 3: photos of him, and then a banner came up on
Speaker 3: the screen saying, thank you for setting up your digital ID.
Speaker 3: My brother was furious. You know the enemy. He doesn't
Speaker 3: play fair. He is a deceiver. If you think CONVID
Speaker 3: was bad in terms of deception and in terms of
Speaker 3: being locked out of society, you better be prepared for
Speaker 3: what is coming. Because without a digital idea, you were
Speaker 3: going to be locked out of most places. And because
Speaker 3: of all these shootings and stabbings, and children accessing adult websites,
Speaker 3: et cetera. The majority of people will be begging for
Speaker 3: tight control on this in the same way that they
Speaker 3: were begging for control during convert. Remember that the VAKA
Speaker 3: wanted the unvacered band from everywhere. They even wanted them
Speaker 3: to be denied medical treatment.
Speaker 1: Waka means cow right, so vaccine. Remember, boy, we're heeeming livestock,
Speaker 1: talking livestock. They are right about a lot of people,
Speaker 1: but they're no better. They're angry livestock. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of people out there that are no better really than
Speaker 1: talking livestock. You know how I know this well because
Speaker 1: they introduced us to them when they flooded our country
Speaker 1: with that from all these weird places in the world. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of talking livestock out there, but those
Speaker 1: aren't the ones that really they really hate because they
Speaker 1: don't really oppose their ThReD to them. We are they're
Speaker 1: the ones. What are the ones they hate? But vodka
Speaker 1: in vaccine? Yeah, because we're being treated like cattle. But
Speaker 1: why did that happen too? When you get something that's
Speaker 1: uh no antibiotics ever, no, uh no rBST hormone. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: guess what it still was injected with all of its
Speaker 1: veterinary shots that have god knows what in them. You
Speaker 1: know how you know that because they would shut them
Speaker 1: down if they didn't. That's how they wanted.
Speaker 3: Them to be booted out of grocery stores. And the
Speaker 3: list goes on. Now, let me show you that this
Speaker 3: isn't just something that's happening in Australia. This is something
Speaker 3: that's happening worldwide.
Speaker 27: Thurright, we will finally complete the biometric entry exit visa
Speaker 27: tracking system which we need desperately. For years, Congress is
Speaker 27: required biometric entry exit visa tracking systems, but it has
Speaker 27: never been completed.
Speaker 10: The politicians are all oh.
Speaker 1: And by the way, her computer when she's playing audio
Speaker 1: from her compute from her screen, has an echo.
Speaker 2: That's not from us.
Speaker 1: If I have an echo, you gotta let me know.
Speaker 1: I don't think we do, though, But if you hear
Speaker 1: from this video, it's it's her video. I recognize it.
Speaker 27: Last night, all talk, no action, never happens, Never happens,
Speaker 27: Hillary Clinton, all talk. Unfortunately, when there is action, it's
Speaker 27: always the wrong decision. Do you ever notice in my administration,
Speaker 27: we will ensure that this system is in play. And
Speaker 27: I will tell you it will be on land, it
Speaker 27: will be on sea, it will be an air. We
Speaker 27: will have a proper tracking system.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Trump promised that he for the goy right exactly because
Speaker 1: the enemy is a bunch of cowards and weasels, and
Speaker 1: they don't like a fair fight. So if they can
Speaker 1: track everybody very very precisely, and we just saw how
Speaker 1: nobody will ever have the element surprise against their overwhelming,
Speaker 1: the overpowered armies that are comprised of people like us
Speaker 1: in America. But they're going to use it against us
Speaker 1: and whomever else they decide to import here to stir
Speaker 1: havoc or some sort of invasion invading army, because we're
Speaker 1: doing that now with all these wars. Uh huh yeah,
Speaker 1: sure would be the one.
Speaker 3: To complete tracking system in the US. And of course
Speaker 3: the problem used was illegal immigration. The Prime Minister of
Speaker 3: the UK is also pushing for digital ID cards. He
Speaker 3: says it's because again of an immigration problem. But the
Speaker 3: solution will be that all UK citizens will need a
Speaker 3: digital ID.
Speaker 1: How Come Trump didn't say We're going to digital the
Speaker 1: track all the freakin' OI v's and dual citizens and
Speaker 1: get them the fuck out of here because the immigration
Speaker 1: problem was caused by them, so the best way to
Speaker 1: solve that problem is to deport Zi Jews. No, he
Speaker 1: didn't say that though.
Speaker 7: Did he.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 3: China has just rolled out a new digital ID which
Speaker 3: links every online click. Now under this headline, it reads
Speaker 3: the scheme issues each person who registers a unique Internet
Speaker 3: code and digital certificate after submitting their national ID card
Speaker 3: and facial recognition data. This is a complete digital prison.
Speaker 3: Everything you search on the Internet will be linked with
Speaker 3: your digital ID, along with your biometric data, which is
Speaker 3: facial recognition, fingerprints and next retina scans. Let's also not
Speaker 3: forget that convert CVID stands for Certificate of Vaccination ID.
Speaker 1: Well, it's also DIBIK, which is what they injected into you.
Speaker 3: The government won everything linked together digitally, from your digital
Speaker 3: footprint to your vakistatus to your biometrics. Let me play
Speaker 3: a clip about this digital prison.
Speaker 9: One man who knows the dangers only too well is Amanjabi,
Speaker 9: who was at the forefront of digital development in Silicon Valley,
Speaker 9: California for twenty.
Speaker 1: Five jerbis getting derby with the shats that'll be I'll
Speaker 1: show them down.
Speaker 9: Yes, he left when he recognized the dark side of
Speaker 9: surveillance technology, choosing instead the peace and beauty of Montana.
Speaker 9: He's an expert in facial recognition.
Speaker 8: It's a technique that is used to uniquely identify the
Speaker 8: biometrics of any face. So in a device like your
Speaker 8: smartphone and most modern smartphones in the last five.
Speaker 10: Or seven years.
Speaker 1: Add Pegasus to that too.
Speaker 8: They have a three D camera module in the front
Speaker 8: of the phone which you cannot see. Within that module
Speaker 8: is a near infrared projector which projects tens of thousands
Speaker 8: of dots on your face. Those dots are then distorted
Speaker 8: based on the contours and the features of your face.
Speaker 10: And there's a near infrared camera.
Speaker 1: Then owned by the way, it doesn't have to be
Speaker 1: by your glow camera, so if you cover you up
Speaker 1: your camera, it's probably part of this. The four size screen.
Speaker 10: Itself takes a picture of that distortion.
Speaker 1: That's a fact for the for the iPhones, because the iPhones,
Speaker 1: I mean they had under that certain lighting when they
Speaker 1: were filming it and they saw the infrared flash. He
Speaker 1: was right at the center of the of the square
Speaker 1: of the phone. It wasn't from the camera.
Speaker 8: Land aptures it and then reverse engineers the exact profile
Speaker 8: of your face. In the longer term, facial recognition will
Speaker 8: be used to unlock your digital identity, which is going
Speaker 8: to be a tool of control for the agendas that
Speaker 8: are coming down the pipeline.
Speaker 9: Elements of that control are already with us Alexa.
Speaker 2: Good morning, good morning.
Speaker 8: You are never alone in your home, and this is
Speaker 8: why all your devices at home and all smart appliances,
Speaker 8: they are all connected on a wireless network. Many of
Speaker 8: these devices will have cameras, many will have microphone and
Speaker 8: so they are monitoring everything all the time. Your smart
Speaker 8: appliances are communicating with the smart meter and sending it
Speaker 8: real time usage data. If there's a ring camera also
Speaker 8: in your home, a mesh network is formed and all
Speaker 8: your devices are being tracked within the home, its location,
Speaker 8: its usage, and all the data is going to Amazon's servers.
Speaker 10: When you leave your home.
Speaker 8: All modern vehicles are connected to the internet, so your
Speaker 8: automobile is being tracked all the time. When you're going
Speaker 8: under a string of smart LED poles and smart LED
Speaker 8: lights on the highway and in the streets of your
Speaker 8: towns and cities, those form a wireless network and are
Speaker 8: tracking your vehicle. They are tracking all the devices on you,
Speaker 8: from smartphones to smart watches when you're walking on the streets,
Speaker 8: so data is being collected.
Speaker 1: Say, did I not say that about the Wi Fi,
Speaker 1: about the the telephone pole are most certainly and I
Speaker 1: mean if they're in this town, they're probably in yours.
Speaker 8: Twenty four to seven, continuously on every human being whenever
Speaker 8: you are within these wireless networks, and it's obviously not
Speaker 8: good for health also because of all the electromagnetic radiation.
Speaker 8: Then the long term the plan is to pretty much
Speaker 8: lock up humanity in smart cities, which is kind of
Speaker 8: a super set of a fifteen minute city. They've sold
Speaker 8: all the state and local governments and countries that smart
Speaker 8: cities are about sustainability and the good of the city,
Speaker 8: But in reality their language from the UN and WEF
Speaker 8: and their white papers is all inverted.
Speaker 10: So pair monitoring is really about.
Speaker 1: Limit inverted like cabalists like the devil, like turning an
Speaker 1: hourglass upside down so that the same flow the other right. Now,
Speaker 1: you know time is Saturn, time is chronosis Saturn. You're Satan.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Emitting mobility and no car ownership right surveillance control via
Speaker 8: led grid is why the smart lighting is done.
Speaker 10: Water management is about what a rationing. Noise pollution is about.
Speaker 8: Speed surveillance, traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility. And then,
Speaker 8: of course energy conservation is all about rationing heat.
Speaker 10: Electricity, and gasoline.
Speaker 8: Another concept one should be familiar with it is called geofencing,
Speaker 8: and that's think of it as an invisible fence around
Speaker 8: you where you cannot go beyond a certain point, and
Speaker 8: that will be related to your face recognition, digital identity
Speaker 8: and access control. Your smart contracts software can turn off
Speaker 8: your digital currency beyond a certain point from your house.
Speaker 8: Our world has been turned into a digital panopticon. That
Speaker 8: means you can be monitored, analyzed.
Speaker 1: That digital prison geofencing. Shit there, Oh you're smarty. Parents,
Speaker 1: You got outside your boundaries. Well, you can't go there
Speaker 1: without your phone because that's how you pay for shit. Now, oh, well,
Speaker 1: now they know that you went past the boundaries. There
Speaker 1: is no travel. You don't get to buy or sell,
Speaker 1: or trade or survive unless you're gonna do it the
Speaker 1: old fashioned way, which won't be allowed because drones will
Speaker 1: fucking kill you and in the woods, and then if
Speaker 1: they're still bears around, they'll pick at your bones.
Speaker 10: Managed and monetized surveillance.
Speaker 9: Capitalists are already making billions of dollars selling out information
Speaker 9: to the big corporations because this kind of detailed knowledge
Speaker 9: enables them to predict and influence our behavior.
Speaker 3: It's all about predicting and influencing our behavior.
Speaker 1: It is Jerry ben Panopticon. Let's get off the AI
Speaker 1: and go to not the computer game. Oh from Brown
Speaker 1: University and external images are day apparently because it's old ass,
Speaker 1: look at the site. Jesus Jeremy Bentham, an English philosopher
Speaker 1: and social theorist in the mid seventeen hundreds, mid seventeen hundreds,
Speaker 1: you know, like before we were officially at the United States,
Speaker 1: invented a social control mechanism that would become a comprehensive
Speaker 1: symbol for modern authority and discipline. But but he know,
Speaker 1: he was a member of of the reading groups, meaning
Speaker 1: an illuminati, because that's what they were. They infiltrated the
Speaker 1: reading groups, the intellectual groups, simple monn authority and discipline.
Speaker 1: In the Western world, a prison system called the pan
Speaker 1: opticon optic pan many eyes, right. The base principle for
Speaker 1: the design, which Bentham first completed in seventeen eighty five,
Speaker 1: still before we became the United States and seventeen eighty
Speaker 1: nine and ratified seventy nine. Whatever fuckers was to monitor
Speaker 1: the maximum number of prisoners with the fewest possible guards
Speaker 1: and other security costs. The layout, which is depicted below,
Speaker 1: though it isn't, consists of central central tower for the guards,
Speaker 1: surrounded by a ring shaped building of prison cells, you know,
Speaker 1: kind of like a smart city tower. The building with
Speaker 1: the prisoners is only one cell thick, and every cell
Speaker 1: has one open side facing the central tower. This open
Speaker 1: side has bars over it, but is otherwise entirely exposed
Speaker 1: to the tower. The guards can thus see the entirety
Speaker 1: of any cell at any time, and the prisoners are
Speaker 1: always vulnerable and visible. Conversely, the tower is far enough
Speaker 1: from the cells and has sufficiently small windows that the
Speaker 1: prisoners cannot see the guards inside of it. They can
Speaker 1: see you, you can't see them. The sociological effect is
Speaker 1: that the prisoners are aware of the presence of authority
Speaker 1: at all times, even though they never know exactly when
Speaker 1: they are being observed. The authority changes from being a
Speaker 1: limited physical entity to being an internalized omniscience. The presence
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, the prisoners, discipline themselves simply because someone might
Speaker 1: be watching, eliminating the need for more physical power to
Speaker 1: accomplish the same task. Think about this, We wouldn't know
Speaker 1: if the power went down, if the grid stopped, if
Speaker 1: the AI stopped communicating for ten twenty an hour, whatever, right,
Speaker 1: because we would not want to risk it, see what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. So you would continue on the behavior because
Speaker 1: that was your survival mode. Just a few guards are
Speaker 1: able to maintain a very large number of prisoners this way.
Speaker 1: So imagine if we get to the point to where
Speaker 1: we are, because we're going there, this is happening to
Speaker 1: where we are basically a point of no return. But
Speaker 1: somehow a data center or ten of them get knocked
Speaker 1: out in an area and the GEOFENSI and grid shuts
Speaker 1: down for a while. Well, they scrambled to fix it
Speaker 1: or whatever. How hard what'll it be for you to
Speaker 1: explain to the prisoners of this panasticon world that have
Speaker 1: been conditioned and traumatized to never ever, ever, ever ever
Speaker 1: give reason for them to be interested in your activity
Speaker 1: to get up and get out of there. No, they'll
Speaker 1: scream at you. They'll scream at you and try to
Speaker 1: kill you. Because now they're part of Plato's cave. In
Speaker 1: eighteen thirteen, I would say, hold on, just a few
Speaker 1: guards are able to maintain a very large number of
Speaker 1: prisoners this way. Arguably there wouldn't even be even need
Speaker 1: to be any guards in the tower at all. In
Speaker 1: eighteen thirteen, Parliament granted Bentham twenty three thousand pounds to
Speaker 1: build the first ever panopticon prison. The Panopticon in New
Speaker 1: Delhi was completed in eighteen seventeen and still functioning as
Speaker 1: a prison to this day. Michael full Coal, a French
Speaker 1: intellectual and critic, expanded the idea of the panopticon into
Speaker 1: a symbol of social control that extends into everyday life
Speaker 1: for all citizens, not just those in the prison system.
Speaker 1: Nineteen seventy. He argues that social citizens always internalize authority.
Speaker 1: That's why you have fucking retarded karens turning you in.
Speaker 1: Not Karen, Karen come ons. Karen internalized authority, which is
Speaker 1: one source of power for prevailing norms and for prevailing
Speaker 1: norms and institutions. A driver, for example, might stop at
Speaker 1: a red light even when there are no other cars
Speaker 1: or police president even though there are not necessarily any
Speaker 1: repercautions the police are internalized and internalized authority. People tend
Speaker 1: to obey laws because those rules become self imposed. Right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I feel like a retargement, like a light's going on
Speaker 1: too long, Like there's nobody there. It's like what am
Speaker 1: I waiting for? Common sense tells me there's no there's
Speaker 1: not going to be a collision here, you know, or
Speaker 1: oh yeah, yeah, sure, I'll wait for the little walky
Speaker 1: guy in order to walk when there's nothing going you know,
Speaker 1: there's no cars. Shut up, Michael fu col A French.
Speaker 1: Did I say that?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I did, Yeah, I did this one. This is a
Speaker 1: profound and complicated idea, namely because the process entails a
Speaker 1: high degree of social institution intuition. I'll shut up. Now
Speaker 1: try it again. Namely, because the process entails a high
Speaker 1: degree of social intuition, the subject must be able to
Speaker 1: uh situate him or herself amidst a network of collective expectations.
Speaker 1: The crucial point is that the subject's specific role within
Speaker 1: the network is incorporated as a part of the body
Speaker 1: and mind, which then manifests a self discipline. As self
Speaker 1: discipline in the course of my project, I will okay,
Speaker 1: this is somebody's paper that's why it's broken. It makes
Speaker 1: sense now, Okay, back to it. We got we got
Speaker 1: a little bit of time left.
Speaker 3: There is complete control, of total control. Talking about predicting
Speaker 3: the future, let's look back at Trump's first speech for
Speaker 3: his second term. This was back in January of this year.
Speaker 4: Oh, thank you very much, and it's an honor to
Speaker 4: be here today.
Speaker 3: We have.
Speaker 4: First full day as president.
Speaker 17: We're back and we had a great first term, but
Speaker 17: we're going to have an even better second term.
Speaker 4: And I think we're going to do things that people
Speaker 4: would be shocked at. Together these worlds technical science.
Speaker 1: Did that sound like a good thing?
Speaker 4: Announcing the formation of stargate?
Speaker 10: Did?
Speaker 1: Did any did anybody just perceive that just like it must?
Speaker 1: That must mean a good thing because they're going to
Speaker 1: be shocked by it. Jesus Christ. Yeah, they're gonna be
Speaker 1: shocked by it, all right, fucking clown all right, anyway,
Speaker 1: So put that.
Speaker 17: Name down in your books, because I think you're gonna
Speaker 17: hear a lot about it.
Speaker 1: She does a good presentation, even though she gets a
Speaker 1: couple of things a little naive and a little bit
Speaker 1: there's a lot more to you than that. But yeah,
Speaker 1: this is so far This is why I'm sharing it
Speaker 1: with you because it basically outlines in detail all the
Speaker 1: things I was going to talk about anyway, and this
Speaker 1: is kind of what our stut Peter's talking about. So
Speaker 1: stup Peter's talk was about this. That's why I started
Speaker 1: getting into this topic in the first place, because I
Speaker 1: was doing research for her the talk. I actually prepare
Speaker 1: for interviews in the future when they're interviewing me, I
Speaker 1: don't prepare for you fuckers.
Speaker 17: New American company that won best five hundred billion dollars
Speaker 17: at least in AI infrastructure.
Speaker 3: The Stargate Project. According to Wikipedia, the term Stargate dates
Speaker 3: back to twenty twenty four, when OpenAI and Microsoft together
Speaker 3: started to develop a one hundred billion dollar supercomputer. Now
Speaker 3: they say that this is not the same Stargate project
Speaker 3: as the US military did back in nineteen seventy seven,
Speaker 3: but I propose that that's exactly what this is. Let's
Speaker 3: read what the nineteen seventy seven Stargate project was all about.
Speaker 3: The Stargate project was a secret US military Army unit
Speaker 3: established in nineteen seventy seven at Fort Meade, Maryland, by
Speaker 3: that Defense Intelligence Agency and SRI International to investigate the
Speaker 3: potential for psychic phenomena in military and domestic intelligence applications.
Speaker 3: The Stargate projects were primarily involved remote viewing, the purpeted
Speaker 3: ability to psychically see events, sites, or information from a
Speaker 3: great distance. The Stargate project was terminated and declassified in
Speaker 3: nineteen ninety five after a CIA commissioned review claims that
Speaker 3: it was never useful in any intelligence operation. Although statistically
Speaker 3: significant effects were observed in laboratory experiments, the reviewers were
Speaker 3: uncertain whether this was the result of errors, and the
Speaker 3: information provided by the program was vague and included irrelevant
Speaker 3: and erroneous data. You know, they say that this project
Speaker 3: ended in nineteen ninety five. However, it appears that with
Speaker 3: the advances in AI and its ability to predict the
Speaker 3: future in the same way that a psychic can buy
Speaker 3: remote viewing, it appears that this is still going ahead.
Speaker 3: These secret military projects always steriously end and then a
Speaker 3: few years later they get renamed under something else. In
Speaker 3: this case, they didn't even bother to rename project Stargate. Now,
Speaker 3: Stargate is about predicting the future. It's about knowing what
Speaker 3: someone is going to do before they do it. I
Speaker 3: want to remind you of another aspect of Trump's announcement
Speaker 3: in regards to the Stargate project.
Speaker 7: One of the most exciting things we're working on you
Speaker 7: again using the tools that that Sam and Massa are providing,
Speaker 7: is a cancer vac scenes. It's very interesting early diet.
Speaker 7: It turns out, I'll be quick. All of our cancers, uh,
Speaker 7: cancer tumors, little fragments of those tumors float around.
Speaker 4: In your blood.
Speaker 7: So you can do early cancer detection if you can
Speaker 7: do using A you can do early cancer detection with
Speaker 7: a blood and using AI to look at the blood test,
Speaker 7: you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening
Speaker 7: the person. So we can again cancer diagnosis using AI
Speaker 7: as the promise of just being a simple blood test.
Speaker 7: Then beyond that, once we gene sequence, once we gene
Speaker 7: sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person.
Speaker 7: Design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them
Speaker 7: against that cancer, and you can make that vaccine, that
Speaker 7: mr NA vaccine. You can make that robotically again using
Speaker 7: AI in about forty eight hours. So imagine early cancer detection,
Speaker 7: the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer
Speaker 7: aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in forty
Speaker 7: eight hours. This is the promise of AI and the
Speaker 7: promise of the future.
Speaker 3: What does the cantabaka I have to do with knowing
Speaker 3: what someone will do in the future. Again, let me
Speaker 3: remind you of the power of these M plus RNA,
Speaker 3: so called fackers.
Speaker 28: So does the data about my DNA, my brain, my body,
Speaker 28: my life, does it belong to me or to some corporation,
Speaker 28: or to the government, or perhaps to the human collective.
Speaker 29: Humans are now hackable animals. You know, the whole idea
Speaker 29: that humans have. You know this, They have this soul
Speaker 29: or spirit, and they have free will, and nobody knows
Speaker 29: what's happening inside me. So whatever I choose, whether in
Speaker 29: the election or whether in the supermarket.
Speaker 30: This is my free will.
Speaker 10: That's over.
Speaker 29: Today we have the technology to hack human beings on
Speaker 29: a massive scale. Yeah, I mean everything is being digitalized,
Speaker 29: everything is being monitored. In this time of crisis, you
Speaker 29: have to follow science. It's often said that you should
Speaker 29: never allow a good crisis to go to waste, because
Speaker 29: a crisis is an opportunity to also do good reforms
Speaker 29: that in normal times people will never agree to.
Speaker 10: But in a crisis, you see, we have no chance, so.
Speaker 2: Let's do it. Vaccine won't help us go work.
Speaker 29: It will help us, of course, it will make things
Speaker 29: more manageable.
Speaker 2: Surveillance.
Speaker 31: People could look back in one hundred years and identify
Speaker 31: the coronavirus epidemic as the moment when a new regime
Speaker 31: of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin, which
Speaker 31: I think is maybe the most important development of the
Speaker 31: twenty first century. Is this ability to hack human beings,
Speaker 31: to go under the skin, collect biometric data, analyze it,
Speaker 31: and understand keep better than they understand themselves. This, I
Speaker 31: believe is maybe the most important event of the twenty
Speaker 31: first century.
Speaker 3: It is all about surveillance under the skin and hacking humans.
Speaker 3: It is about them knowing you better than you know yourself.
Speaker 3: Like what we read before about this Gideon project, AI
Speaker 3: learned your habits and understands your thoughts. Imagine how much
Speaker 3: more it would understand your habits and learn your thoughts
Speaker 3: from inside your body rather than just from your social
Speaker 3: media or digital footprint. Now, just to reiterate how pharmacaea
Speaker 3: or sorcery can read what's happening inside your body, let's
Speaker 3: listen to what the CEO Affiser has to say about
Speaker 3: his new electronic pills.
Speaker 32: FDA approved the first electronic pill, if I can call
Speaker 32: it like that. So it is a basically biological ship
Speaker 32: that it is in the tablet, and once you take
Speaker 32: the tablet and dissolves into your stomach, sends a signal.
Speaker 32: But you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of
Speaker 32: that compliance. These sort of companies to know that the
Speaker 32: medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It
Speaker 32: is fascinating what happens in this field.
Speaker 3: Don't take your pills or your vackers. Your health insurance
Speaker 3: company will know despite you paying your premiums, because of
Speaker 3: your non compliance, your contract with them becomes null and void.
Speaker 3: So you can forget them paying out anything for you.
Speaker 3: And if you think that you will get around these
Speaker 3: tyrannical governments and companies with things like fake vacker passports, etc.
Speaker 3: Think again. These biologic called chip send data straight back
Speaker 3: to the drug manufacturers, who then sell this information back
Speaker 3: to your health care and insurance providers. There will be
Speaker 3: no getting around this. Yeah, we're fucked, not even with
Speaker 3: private VPNs, not when it's Jewish private VPNs or Israeli. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 3: you yourself.
Speaker 1: They created the guidem Internet. They know how it works.
Speaker 1: They can access anything at any time that you decide
Speaker 1: to if you're going to be playing on it, if
Speaker 1: you're going to be on it or near it, they're
Speaker 1: going to know. Would they want to know? Otherwise they
Speaker 1: would look at this guy's fucking stare. It's a little
Speaker 1: he's got a husband, and he calls himself a rabbi,
Speaker 1: and that's okay with their sick cult. It's actually probably
Speaker 1: congratulated in their sick cult.
Speaker 3: Who is hooked up to the Internet of Things via
Speaker 3: the Internet of bodies. Now, if a simple little oral
Speaker 3: pill has the power and technology to do this, imagine
Speaker 3: and how much more they can get from a self
Speaker 3: assembling injectible new relays graphine mesh network that has been
Speaker 3: injected directly into the blood stream that can cross the
Speaker 3: blood brain barrier.
Speaker 1: Blood brain barrier is just a different form of water.
Speaker 1: It's like a plasma, different state of water. It's not
Speaker 1: a it's not like a gate. It's not like a
Speaker 1: who goes there halts They think they may I think
Speaker 1: people have a really stranger way of viewing that. It's
Speaker 1: it's a it's a it's a density barrier if anything
Speaker 1: like gel Now just to show how I but charged
Speaker 1: with a type of frequently a type of energy that
Speaker 1: repels things that from from also getting there. So it's
Speaker 1: not just the it's not just the density barrier, but
Speaker 1: it's all so you know, I mean, andre Jedic.
Speaker 3: Okaya are both one in the same and can't be separated.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at what I have on the
Speaker 3: screen now in very recent news, as in the September
Speaker 3: which we're currently in of twenty five.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is Trumpet a bunch of mass murders who
Speaker 1: just you know, in this his first round, got a
Speaker 1: bunch of people injected with deadly poison. And yet he's
Speaker 1: still the president again and Millennia is still not fucking him.
Speaker 1: And there's Bill Gates Jersey.
Speaker 3: Trump hosted a tech dinner at ma a Lago with
Speaker 3: thirty three of Silicon Valley's top tech.
Speaker 1: Giant fucking thirty three. Well, look, there's JD. Vance, the
Speaker 1: real head of the household, because he's the one at
Speaker 1: the front of the table.
Speaker 30: At the table.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Now, Now, some of these giants include Sergey Brinn, who
Speaker 3: was the founder of Google BRNN now heads up Chat GPT,
Speaker 3: Sam Oltman and Greg Brockman, both of open AI.
Speaker 1: They're the ones who, yeah, open morals, right, open legs,
Speaker 1: Open ais. They should have called it open anis I
Speaker 1: we're talking about. We're talking about the good old, good
Speaker 1: old Sammy there. Oh by the way, he also sexually
Speaker 1: abused his sister, which puts him rate in line with hey,
Speaker 1: just about every other Jew, especially the ones that were
Speaker 1: more frank with Zionus leading.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, winning with Bill Gates to build this one
Speaker 3: hundred billion dollars supercomputer, with this Stargate project. Saffract, CEO of.
Speaker 1: Oracle, where was where was the vulcyri guy? Then? Right,
Speaker 1: they're all sitting there together. Where's the vulcary guy when
Speaker 1: you need him? Don't fuck this one up? And this
Speaker 1: time it would be okay when the one you did
Speaker 1: in Germany that we don't like you for that one.
Speaker 1: But I mean, if you were here, you can get
Speaker 1: your you're blow upping, uh you could you could scratch
Speaker 1: your blow up itch, you know your your your gihatch.
Speaker 3: Jason Chang, CEO of cs bio, which is a Farmer
Speaker 3: CAAA company. Also Natalie Dompey from don Pey Bio Pharmaceuticals.
Speaker 3: She was there. Then we have Sonny Mandra from Groth,
Speaker 3: which is and.
Speaker 1: How that flashes. It's like her screen is literally taking
Speaker 1: a picture of us. Well, we'll watch you do for
Speaker 1: the in from dead camera it gives on flashing. I
Speaker 1: was on like, I was on do you love to go?
Speaker 1: Watching this last night? And I'm like, stop it, stop it,
Speaker 1: stop it. I was like, you know, having a fun
Speaker 1: game in my head. Just be like I know what
Speaker 1: you're doing. Just knock it off, Like, come on, bro,
Speaker 1: I'm a sweaty right now. It's being funny.
Speaker 3: Though, Chip Company and Lisa sous CEO of Advanced.
Speaker 1: Micro Devices did Flatchigan.
Speaker 3: There was also such An Adella CEO of Microsoft, Sanda
Speaker 3: Pichet CEO of Alphabet and Google. I am same CAAs
Speaker 3: CTO of Palenteer.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 3: Palenteer is a very similar company to what I went
Speaker 3: over before with Gideon and Social net etca.
Speaker 1: No, it's completely different, it really is. That's not what
Speaker 1: they do they can. Palenteer software compiles the data from
Speaker 1: AI to arrange it to make so that AI can
Speaker 1: make sense of it. It's a component of AI, meaning
Speaker 1: it doesn't work properly without it. It's they made themselves
Speaker 1: essential for it. It's like, then, you know, this's how
Speaker 1: to be done on purpose. Develop the layout of the platform,
Speaker 1: the capacity in one layer, and then the other layer
Speaker 1: that which makes it work, and have that be a
Speaker 1: separate company or an outsourced thing. That's very Jewish of
Speaker 1: them to sell you one piece at a time to
Speaker 1: build your you know what I mean. It's just I
Speaker 1: thought I already bought you no, but now you need
Speaker 1: this to actually make the run. And you see it's like,
Speaker 1: so yeah, that's kind of like what they did. So
Speaker 1: if they want to make any use out of their AI,
Speaker 1: they're going to have to have the paleteer type of software.
Speaker 1: And this is what's been making lists of targets for
Speaker 1: them for Israel. Also, by the way, incidentally, they've got
Speaker 1: big ass fucking lists of threat assessed targets here. And
Speaker 1: it's just a matter of time before anything too kookie
Speaker 1: gets stirred up on the surface here in America. There
Speaker 1: will be plenty of people just disappearing, dropping dead, having
Speaker 1: heart attacks, getting struked out. If they got the shot,
Speaker 1: it'll be easy from remote access to do that. Some
Speaker 1: emitted ray just enough to distract somebody at the wrong time,
Speaker 1: and then the probability of events after that to where
Speaker 1: they get hit by a car or trip over into
Speaker 1: a fucking train station track or something, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, make them dizzy, get them disoriented, sort of
Speaker 1: some sort of tech beam or whatever, drugs, heart attack anything.
Speaker 1: People are gonna be dying or red flagged. Anybody who
Speaker 1: could be considered a potential leader or guiding hand, someone
Speaker 1: who has a strong enough personality and wherewithal to execute
Speaker 1: a plan is going to be removed from the chessboard
Speaker 1: before the real war even starts. You're just gonna have
Speaker 1: the mush, the unarmed, pussified mush overweight that's gonna cry
Speaker 1: and beg and shit and piss themselves to be put
Speaker 1: into a camp and asked not to be hurt. And
Speaker 1: then that camp will just be like a meat grinder
Speaker 1: and there'll be a big Jewish hand on here going
Speaker 1: like this making disgusting, smelly sausage.
Speaker 3: Chinkok from Apple, Mark Zuckerberg, from Mida slash Facebook.
Speaker 1: And of course, by the way, for all of you
Speaker 1: out there watching this, this collectively is the Bolshevik digital Cheka. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is what we're litt this in here, we're witnessing
Speaker 1: the setup for a purim. Regardless off it ever really
Speaker 1: happened in the Book of esther Or No, I doubt it.
Speaker 1: I don't believe anything in that fucking grimoire. But that's
Speaker 1: the template to get their jollys off, to emulate every
Speaker 1: moment they can't afterward. So just like they, you know,
Speaker 1: they had King Ahasus basically turn on his own people,
Speaker 1: turned the blind eye and let Mordecai after they got
Speaker 1: done killing and hanging Ham or Harama Ham whatever his
Speaker 1: name is Haram and and his sons, which I think
Speaker 1: made a total of eleven people they killed. Then they
Speaker 1: disenfranchised him, took his property, and then they went on
Speaker 1: to kill crazy ramp age of other goym because they
Speaker 1: they were offended. Right, of course, this is in Persia
Speaker 1: because Cyrus is a retard and Kingstus is a bigger retard,
Speaker 1: and not happened whatever hell's name was, King, whatever the
Speaker 1: hell the title is, I don't know. I don't think
Speaker 1: it was a yeah. Anyway, you get the point though,
Speaker 1: because he wanted jew booty. Jew booty kind of like
Speaker 1: a cash betel, right, except he's not that important. He's
Speaker 1: not important enough for that to matter.
Speaker 3: They are tech dinner without Billy goat gates. So let's
Speaker 3: watch a little snippet of this dinner.
Speaker 4: Bill, would you like to say a few words.
Speaker 1: If they're not, I'm going to give me a suicide
Speaker 1: right here at this table with this knife. We don't
Speaker 1: want to hear it and go for the jugular. Oh
Speaker 1: look it's this faggot right here. Look at his big
Speaker 1: bushy jewfro. That guy totally looks like he should be
Speaker 1: worth billions of dollars and have a forty five million
Speaker 1: dollars super yacht. Yeah, that's that's what I want, because
Speaker 1: you know lifelog. I'm sorry, did I say that. I
Speaker 1: meant to say Facebook.
Speaker 4: Well, I'm in the second.
Speaker 12: Phase of my career giving away all the wonderful money
Speaker 12: that stopped his good work.
Speaker 1: Put both hands above the table. I don't know what
Speaker 1: the hell you're doing, but you're vibrating out of there.
Speaker 1: But I want to see both hands above the table. Sir,
Speaker 1: the help, no, stop it, stop it. Put your hands
Speaker 1: above the table. Water the water is rippling. What the
Speaker 1: hell are you doing under there with your hands? By
Speaker 1: a lot, But I think the thing that Melania is
Speaker 1: sitting next to you, and you're looking ahead at some
Speaker 1: dude and the table's vibrating. What the fuck is happening here?
Speaker 12: My first career that I still spend some time long
Speaker 12: because AI's so funny.
Speaker 1: I guess she's not fraid of shedding.
Speaker 12: And my second career is in innovation and innovating and
Speaker 12: health in areas like vaccines or TENE EDITINGE and the
Speaker 12: President and I are talking about taking American innovation to
Speaker 12: the next level to cure and even to eradicate some
Speaker 12: of these diseases.
Speaker 1: Well, we're the disease that they want to eradicate because
Speaker 1: think about how you how you end a disease. You
Speaker 1: endo people to have the disease. That's how you cure
Speaker 1: cancer too. You kill a person with a cancer, right,
Speaker 1: it's not really You got to look at how these
Speaker 1: psychopaths look at it. The disease is the fact that
Speaker 1: there's these vermin that they don't like, even though they're
Speaker 1: the most discussing hideous creatures on the planet. Is we're
Speaker 1: the vermin to them because we represent everything that they
Speaker 1: can't be. So they have to put us in a
Speaker 1: they have to be disparaging to us. And condescending, envious
Speaker 1: people who are condescending, who have obsessed about us like
Speaker 1: fags for the last five thousand years. Now comes a
Speaker 1: time where they're going to call us the disease because
Speaker 1: we get disease, even though they know that's not true either,
Speaker 1: because they're the ones that manipulate our perception of that
Speaker 1: as well. So it's like, get it. Get rid of
Speaker 1: the dirty people, is what he essentially said. Get rid
Speaker 1: of the dirty people. That's what they are, though, isn't
Speaker 1: that funny? I wasn't a bunch of Germans and Irishmen
Speaker 1: and I don't know what else, what else I don't
Speaker 1: know Frenchmen who came into the camps full of lice
Speaker 1: and filthy. No, no, it wasn't a pile of frenchmen's
Speaker 1: shoes or or or irishman's shoes that they found there
Speaker 1: because they are being fumigated for all the fucking filth
Speaker 1: that they were covered in. No, No, it wasn't that.
Speaker 1: It was the Jews. He purposely live in filths, sometimes
Speaker 1: waiting for the eschatological uh climax where everybody's dead and
Speaker 1: they can dance on your grave and piss on you
Speaker 1: and then rub their dicks on your dead faces.
Speaker 12: He mentioned polio, which is one that we're close. We
Speaker 12: don't need new science on that one for some like hype.
Speaker 1: Is whispering, do you hear it?
Speaker 4: Sickle cell?
Speaker 10: We do need new science.
Speaker 12: But the US has the seeds that in the same
Speaker 12: way that orb speed took those seeds and put them together.
Speaker 2: I think something fantastic can be done.
Speaker 1: He doesn't even make sense. He's just rambling.
Speaker 2: Guy.
Speaker 10: For our foundation is that we want to all.
Speaker 1: Right, all right, all right, Bill, you're only worth xbill
Speaker 1: a billion of dollars. Your time is up. You don't
Speaker 1: even to listen to this anymore. Next, let's let's go.
Speaker 1: Let's get juw fro in here. Juwfro, what do you how?
Speaker 1: How is Facebook going to save the world? Explain it
Speaker 1: and go sure for everyone in Africa through AI blooh,
Speaker 1: fucking blood.
Speaker 3: So interesting. The Gates spoke about putting two seeds, getting
Speaker 3: two seeds and putting them together like mingling of the seeds,
Speaker 3: a corruption of the seeds.
Speaker 1: Blood, buddy, camera. They're already putting cow serum and egg
Speaker 1: and yolk into your body along with fetal infant cells.
Speaker 1: They are making chimera every time they inject you with
Speaker 1: their freaking poisonous needles. So yeah, no shit, that's just
Speaker 1: be common sense.
Speaker 3: And of course he had to use all we need
Speaker 3: to help the.
Speaker 1: Pull literally a freaking witch's cauldron full of shit that
Speaker 1: it's like wing of bat. I have toad, chunk of
Speaker 1: baby from which I do not know there. Yeah, great,
Speaker 1: here stirred up has them. Oh no, no, you're not
Speaker 1: drinking it. I'm going to inject it into your arm.
Speaker 1: You sure that's safe now?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 3: But it is effective people of Africa because it's you know,
Speaker 3: it's all about helping people. You see, all those in
Speaker 3: attendancy are a part of this worldwide surveillance agenda. Whether
Speaker 3: they're tech computer companies or tech pharmacare companies, everything is
Speaker 3: being monitored, and I mean everything internally and externally. Now
Speaker 3: I'm actually really surprised that this man wasn't at the
Speaker 3: tech dinner. This is Jordi Rhot's, previous founder of d Wave,
Speaker 3: the world's He.
Speaker 1: Was found in a pile of the rito and cheeto
Speaker 1: dust with still his very hard for interrection and gay
Speaker 1: porn all over his computer. That's why dad, of course,
Speaker 1: I'm just kidding.
Speaker 3: First, quantum computers. The AI infrastructure the Trump announced at
Speaker 3: the beginning of his second term was all about building
Speaker 3: a huge data center that uses quantum computers. That is
Speaker 3: how they're going to be able to store so much
Speaker 3: data on every individual person. Now talking about Jordie Rose
Speaker 3: Ros's next venture after d Wave was heading up the
Speaker 3: company Kindred AI. Both d Wave and Kindred Ai have
Speaker 3: been named in MIT's Top fifty Smartest Companies. Let's see
Speaker 3: what this guy has to say about AI and FYI.
Speaker 3: This video we're about to watch was from Kindred AI.
Speaker 3: It was eight years ago, and according to the Rose
Speaker 3: theory of AI doubling its capability every year, AI is
Speaker 3: now two hundred and fifty six times smarter than what
Speaker 3: Jordie says makes it out to be in this video.
Speaker 33: These things that we're building are not gonna be people.
Speaker 33: They might be really smart, they might be really good
Speaker 33: at all sorts of different things, but they're not gonna
Speaker 33: be like us.
Speaker 6: They're gonna be aliens, and.
Speaker 33: They're gonna be, I'm sorry to say, way smarter than
Speaker 33: every single person in this room in ways that we
Speaker 33: can't even comprehend.
Speaker 6: So this, of course triggers a lot of alarm.
Speaker 33: One of the guys who talks about this is Elon,
Speaker 33: who says things like this, like, when you do this,
Speaker 33: beware because you think, just like the guy in the stories,
Speaker 33: that when you do this, you're gonna put that that
Speaker 33: that little guy in a pentagram, and you're gonna have
Speaker 33: your holy water out and you're gonna wave it at
Speaker 33: the thing, and by god, it's gonna do exactly what
Speaker 33: you say and not one thing more.
Speaker 6: But it never works out that way.
Speaker 33: So this is this is an attitude that some are having,
Speaker 33: this emerging alarm about the way this is gonna go.
Speaker 33: But this these words demons, doesn't capture the essence of
Speaker 33: what's happening here.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 33: I don't know if any of you are turn of
Speaker 33: the century weird fiction fans, but there's this guy named
Speaker 33: HP Lovecraft who's a very famous.
Speaker 1: Pause on that for a second. Okay, ah, you know
Speaker 1: something like that, Get tulu tulu? Oh wait, hold on,
Speaker 1: let's get some scenes on here. Do you read that?
Speaker 7: Are king.
Speaker 1: Kind of like that? Maybe maybe something like that, something
Speaker 1: like that, who's the old lady? There you go? Shes
Speaker 1: got a couple couple extra tentacles there. Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 2: There she is.
Speaker 1: She's pretty highs the Indescribables. Yeah, that's nice, good times.
Speaker 1: That's a great picture.
Speaker 17: There you go.
Speaker 1: That's a painting that's on the wall that starts id
Speaker 1: morphs into this thing. You get it too. This is her,
Speaker 1: but she's you know, killing her husband at the same
Speaker 1: time with an axe and she's got a couple extra
Speaker 1: arms there. Yeah, this isn't awful boat. This yes is
Speaker 1: missus pickman pickman. Oh, let's go do doo mm hmm surprise. Okay.
Speaker 1: So yeah, so the the the unimaginables, the Catulhu, the
Speaker 1: demons from a different realm. Going right back to the
Speaker 1: whole idea that this is a computer system designed to
Speaker 1: punch holes where the firmament keeps things out, to stop
Speaker 1: a natural barrier. That something God or one of our
Speaker 1: other incarnations of higher technology already separated excuse me, from
Speaker 1: this world on a for a reason, and these fucking
Speaker 1: sorcerers want to bring it back. And how are they
Speaker 1: being informed on how to do it? Probably because we've
Speaker 1: already created a e before and that's just the method
Speaker 1: in the vehicle. There's nothing, there's no such thing as
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence and some their intelligence utilizing something else that
Speaker 1: ople podcasts action required. What happened? Did I get kicked off?
Speaker 1: Oh shit, I hope not. It's just a new new policies,
Speaker 1: probably to get me kicked off later. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to be on any podcasts soon because they already got
Speaker 1: me off of Spotify and some other ones. Anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 1: so there you go. I got distracted by that.
Speaker 3: But so.
Speaker 1: Kindred d wave or it's de wave no, no sanctuary
Speaker 1: AI machines that work and think like people. Yes, it's nice, wonderful,
Speaker 1: but just understand that they're talking about portals and if
Speaker 1: they can, they can punch them through you in ritual.
Speaker 1: But why why limit it to ritual when you can
Speaker 1: utilize technology and sert and all these other things to
Speaker 1: utilize the magnetism. Once you understand the frequency is what
Speaker 1: you were actually after, the harnessing of energy that people's screams,
Speaker 1: which is what you'll use the smart these four is
Speaker 1: people's horror and terror and suffering and misery to generate.
Speaker 1: They'll be running off, they'll be running their own city
Speaker 1: off their own misery energy. Yes, yes, and something will
Speaker 1: rule over them. And these fucking things think that they're
Speaker 1: gonna somehow, even though he just said, oh yeah, you
Speaker 1: put it in the circle, you put in the middle
Speaker 1: of the of the hex, you know, then you stand
Speaker 1: away and it's gonna do it's it's gonna be confined
Speaker 1: to that salt circle. Yeah, not really. But these things,
Speaker 1: these things, these people think that they're going whatever the
Speaker 1: hell they are in skin suits, think that they're going
Speaker 1: to be outside of it, like they'll be its servants
Speaker 1: or whatever. No no, no, no, no, no, no no,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be really fun when they have their head
Speaker 1: spun around and snapped, unless, of course, they're actually already
Speaker 1: are embodied by this thing because of the rituals that
Speaker 1: they've done, and that's why they feel so confident. Because
Speaker 1: the human, if they're whatever human element it was gone
Speaker 1: generations ago, regenerations ago in their bloodlines. So now they're
Speaker 1: just repurposing the same carcasses basically for this entity, this force,
Speaker 1: this dipic, this whatever it is, this ancient one.
Speaker 6: This American weird fiction author.
Speaker 1: And because I don't think HP Lovecraft was super super like,
Speaker 1: I don't know, creative. I think he was just informed.
Speaker 33: Exposed of you, which is called cosmicism, and the essence
Speaker 33: of cosmicism is cosmic indifference. So he what he was
Speaker 33: saying is basically, yes, there are these massively intelligent entities
Speaker 33: out there, but they're not good, they're not evil. They
Speaker 33: just don't give a shit about you, even in the slightest.
Speaker 33: The same way you don't care about an ant is
Speaker 33: the same way.
Speaker 1: I actually care about ant, so I try not to
Speaker 1: step on them on purpose. Yeah. But see, there's the thing.
Speaker 1: It's not just in difference. It is in difference to
Speaker 1: a point, to a degree, but it's also they are
Speaker 1: It's not like they're going and planting flowers and don't
Speaker 1: care if you're in the way, they will plant the
Speaker 1: flower three you. They're not going out and doing nice things.
Speaker 1: There are a destructive, evil, wicked force that has people
Speaker 1: like it like this guy and all of the Jews
Speaker 1: and all of the satron cle killing and raping children
Speaker 1: to get its attention. So it's obviously not just indifferent
Speaker 1: to things. That's a fucking lie. It's indifferent to suffering,
Speaker 1: meaning it doesn't feel bad. Well, no shit, does it
Speaker 1: get its rocks off for it? Yes, that's why it
Speaker 1: does it, meaning it puts its desire for power, energy, whatever,
Speaker 1: satisfaction over your life. That's its indifference. It's not indifference like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we don't oh, just passing through and you're in the way,
Speaker 1: So I passed through your body and now you're bloody
Speaker 1: mess on the ground. No, that's not what it means.
Speaker 6: Wait, they're not going to care about you.
Speaker 33: And these things that were summoning into the world now
Speaker 33: are not demons, they're not evil, but they're more.
Speaker 1: Like just right outside it. We're summoning things that are
Speaker 1: above demon class. They're dibick, they're evil spirits of the
Speaker 1: undead or previously. I don't know what the fuck is,
Speaker 1: but that's what covid backward is. It's ivo d I
Speaker 1: v O C and that when you type that in
Speaker 1: it says it's derivative of dy bb uk, which is
Speaker 1: bullshit Hebrew for a disembodied spirit of evil, an evil
Speaker 1: disembodied spirit, not like a gin that could be one
Speaker 1: or the other or anything in between, like a human. No,
Speaker 1: a dipic. He's flat out telling you that these things
Speaker 1: are more dangerous than demons. You don't quite understand this.
Speaker 1: These things eat demons and shit fucking saints. Whatever. I
Speaker 1: don't know what the hell they're saying, but this is
Speaker 1: what they're conjuring. Any flat out says this like he
Speaker 1: believes it. So if he's not cracked out of his mind,
Speaker 1: has there been a test run? Is there something already
Speaker 1: here through some smaller portal before they kick the fucking
Speaker 1: doors open? Is that what's guiding them right now? Because
Speaker 1: their ey has been teaked? Well, whatever the hell it
Speaker 1: has been taught out how to build a lot of
Speaker 1: shit in the last two hundred years, then it super
Speaker 1: accelerated since the nineteen forties. Oddly enough, well.
Speaker 33: Of crafty and great old ones, there are entities that
Speaker 33: are not necessarily going to be aligned with what we want.
Speaker 33: So this transition is really, really massively important for our
Speaker 33: entire species to navigate.
Speaker 1: And why when it's completely avoidable, they need you in
Speaker 1: order to let them in. Why the fuck would you
Speaker 1: do that? Why do you want worlds to collide? They
Speaker 1: have their place, we have ours. What is it that
Speaker 1: you expect to gain once they finally come through? That's
Speaker 1: what I don't understand, except for a quick Swiss death.
Speaker 2: Is that how they is that?
Speaker 1: How they're going to I don't know, Well, I mean
Speaker 1: when you understand the nature of Saturn and what they've
Speaker 1: been doing this whole time. That is what their god is,
Speaker 1: and they will they are willing to be decimated by
Speaker 1: that thing. And or it's a sixth suicidal, homicidal, genocidal,
Speaker 1: rapey little cult that they have there. But it's just
Speaker 1: is that how you achieve your escatle escatellogical uh, you know,
Speaker 1: accelerationism is that you bring something that evil in here.
Speaker 1: It's not even close to being like the devil who
Speaker 1: sits and calmly, you know, but just isn't like very reasonable. No,
Speaker 1: it's something that just tears through flesh and soul and
Speaker 1: destroys the sun and everything else around here. And somehow
Speaker 1: they're okay with that. They're cool with that because they
Speaker 1: think there's another realm for them which is completely outside
Speaker 1: of it. And it's like that's like their rapture, like
Speaker 1: they'll get carried away. Everything's good because as soon as
Speaker 1: if they let them in, then they get the deal here.
Speaker 1: How about the thing about not doing it at all,
Speaker 1: and they don't get a chance to come in here
Speaker 1: at all, so they can't be a threat to you
Speaker 1: or us. Why didn't you fucking do that instead of
Speaker 1: making it so that they could kill us, your jackass
Speaker 1: and everyone else and destroy all of eternity. End time.
Speaker 1: Time is Saturday. Time is Coronus is Saturday, the Satan.
Speaker 1: But once he's here, time is a elephant when you're
Speaker 1: an elephant.
Speaker 6: And going back to that thing that Sam Harris was saying,
Speaker 6: nobody is paying attention.
Speaker 3: As per what Rose said, the word demon it's not wrong,
Speaker 3: but it just doesn't quite cature what's happening here.
Speaker 1: D Wave, the wave that they're going to or the
Speaker 1: the frequency or that they're going to be. It's like bait,
Speaker 1: like a like a beacon, a beacon to get them
Speaker 1: to come in. Demon Wave. Oh is that what that is?
Speaker 1: Well in front of us the whole time.
Speaker 3: Rose preferred to refer to these.
Speaker 1: Dude probably wasn't a jock. I'm just gonna guess because
Speaker 1: that then it could have been like Dick waving, you know,
Speaker 1: D Wave. But no, he's he's demons, dungeons and dragon Wave.
Speaker 3: II bots that we are summoning into this world as entities. Now,
Speaker 3: what is an entity? By definition? An entity is the
Speaker 3: fact of existence, a being, And these beings or entities,
Speaker 3: they don't care about you and I. We are like
Speaker 3: ants to them, not my words. Fiction is more fact
Speaker 3: these days than it ever has been.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: In Rosa's latest venture at Sanctuary AI, Jordie was quote
Speaker 3: making and selling machines that work and think like people.
Speaker 3: Their mission statement, Sanctuary AI is on a mission to
Speaker 3: create and deploy millions of industrial grade humanoid robots to
Speaker 3: help address growing labor challenges. Now, according to Sanctuary AI.
Speaker 1: Our pop is that who's going to be you supply?
Speaker 1: Oh man, Amazon's going to fucking suck soon. They can't
Speaker 1: even package it a bot's properly right now. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: why they keep monsett of me broken packages, because they're
Speaker 1: training their stupid robots to do it instead of people.
Speaker 1: Is that who's picking the orders? Maybe it is. I'm
Speaker 1: sure there's some really scary freaking shit going on and
Speaker 1: in Amazon and AWS population.
Speaker 3: Is decreasing, and we need these humanoids to take over
Speaker 3: people's jobs because soon there's not going to be enough
Speaker 3: people left to work. You know something I find really
Speaker 3: disturbing if you go on to Jordie Rose's.
Speaker 30: What is that a.
Speaker 1: Admission of the true size of the population being nowhere
Speaker 1: near what they say it is? Nowhere near what Bill
Speaker 1: Gates says, nowhere near the concerns of climate control, you know,
Speaker 1: climate change? Or is it that they've already planned an
Speaker 1: event where they're going to wipe out everybody and then
Speaker 1: they'll need real to be their servants. Because robots are
Speaker 1: better than goy because they don't you know, they don't rebel.
Speaker 1: Maybe I don't know. What are the robots roll when
Speaker 1: the katulu come right Cadulu with his many tentacles and
Speaker 1: his the hydra from the from the What do the
Speaker 1: robots do that I don't know. Oh, maybe they'll be
Speaker 1: powered by its mind. Oh that's great, you'll get a
Speaker 1: fair day in quote.
Speaker 3: With that website, you can download Jordie's full genome sequence. Now,
Speaker 3: other than cloning and genetic engineering, what on earth would
Speaker 3: someone want to download Jordie's entire DNA sequence for? We'll see.
Speaker 1: Well, that's bullshit science anyway, because ninety eight percent of
Speaker 1: DNA they don't know what it does, because the retards
Speaker 1: and they don't want to admit to the fact that
Speaker 1: they don't that they're purposely denying certain energetic aspects of
Speaker 1: existence on certain things that they probably don't even have.
Speaker 1: But so You can't perfectly genetically sequence it out if
Speaker 1: you don't know what it does and why it's there,
Speaker 1: why it's you know, if you don't understand the importance
Speaker 1: of eachy aspect of it, you become a retard who
Speaker 1: does things like isolating rather than using a whole food. Well, here,
Speaker 1: the most important part of Jordy was his eyebrows, so
Speaker 1: right concentrated eyebrows.
Speaker 3: When you understand that pharma, CHAA and computers go hand
Speaker 3: in hand and what they're planning on doing with creating.
Speaker 1: She's doing this shit on purpose? Is she bumped into
Speaker 1: the school, like why is it flash all the time?
Speaker 3: A digital copy of you? You'll understand why he has
Speaker 3: his entire genome sequence on there, and he's more than
Speaker 3: happy for people to use it. Now, if you ask me,
Speaker 3: AI is one hundred percent mask of rating as an
Speaker 3: angel of light. Yes, it seems to be helpful. It
Speaker 3: seems to make our lives easier in many ways.
Speaker 1: She's confusing consumer grade AI with what they have that's retarded.
Speaker 1: Walkshit to change people's public perception of things because they're
Speaker 1: bowing it in an intellectual and inferiority to something that's
Speaker 1: been programmed by a bunch of stupid demon child killing
Speaker 1: Jews and other Saturn Court members and calling that AI.
Speaker 1: That's not what it is. I may or may not
Speaker 1: already be here, but it's coming from someplace else. And
Speaker 1: they think they just explained that, but she didn't catch it.
Speaker 3: I mean, look at robot vacuums, look at GPS's. When
Speaker 3: we sit back, though, and really look at what's happening here.
Speaker 3: With the advances in technology, we can see where this
Speaker 3: journey's headed, and it's not good. It is absolutely not
Speaker 3: from danger zone for our benefit. And this journey is
Speaker 3: not leading us to God. In fact, it's leading us
Speaker 3: so far away from God as we get so wrapped
Speaker 3: up in our technology, we are silencing the voice of God.
Speaker 3: More and more.
Speaker 1: Now tells me doing that, how he did a danger
Speaker 1: zone song in my head. Don't worry about it.
Speaker 3: According to these tech giants or Titans as they're often
Speaker 3: referred to, as, there is only one way to beat
Speaker 3: a complete AI takeover. It's not a priest, it's not
Speaker 3: holy water, and according to them, it's definitely not Jesus,
Speaker 3: as what he.
Speaker 12: Was talking about is humans as we know it will
Speaker 12: be over be misunderstood, buddy, I think that's inevitable.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no, nonsense is of fucking Stephen Hawking, who
Speaker 1: wasn't a real person, who cares? Who cares? Let's go
Speaker 1: back there, Come on, here's good.
Speaker 3: Now. We all know or have been told that Doge.
Speaker 1: Or her name is Delia means worships God, and it
Speaker 1: is of French origin, derived from the word deal or
Speaker 1: deos right meaning god. It is a unique name that
Speaker 1: reflects a connection to faith and spirituality. The only problem
Speaker 1: is that bitch ain't real and she is an ambassador
Speaker 1: or some shit. But more of that later.
Speaker 3: Apartment of Government Efficiency was supposedly all set up for
Speaker 3: our benefit.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, it's not Doge, it's e God, electronic God.
Speaker 1: You got to read it backward.
Speaker 3: Well, that is the so called problem in their style.
Speaker 3: They were supposedly exposing all the government's corruptions and they
Speaker 3: were going to do a big cleanup of things for
Speaker 3: our benefit. Of course, again that was the stile. What
Speaker 3: was really happening was that mister brain chip Musk got
Speaker 3: access to every American's information for one and for two.
Speaker 3: This was all a part of them bringing in AI governance,
Speaker 3: an AI god as must.
Speaker 30: Called it, I know, except to say that by the
Speaker 30: time these lawsuits are decided, we'll have digital guide, so
Speaker 30: our digital guide at that point, these lawsuits won't be
Speaker 30: decided before an attack frame that is relevant.
Speaker 3: Is so called AI God.
Speaker 1: Why are they also fidgety when they're targeting.
Speaker 13: You?
Speaker 1: Freaking It's like he was asked a hard question or something. Yes,
Speaker 1: it is God, and e God is a is a
Speaker 1: doge coin too? Money is your god? E God electronic God?
Speaker 1: Come on, guys, and how funny is it? I'm holding
Speaker 1: out for Katulu cash though Katulu twenty twenty six. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's all I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Is going to be governing. Now, let me play you
Speaker 3: this news clip because we have just received the world's
Speaker 3: first AI government minister and it is not being shown anywhere.
Speaker 20: Savania just became the first country to induct an AI minister,
Speaker 20: not to be confused with the Minister.
Speaker 10: For Artificial Intelligence, though the nation.
Speaker 20: Has an old virtual minister powered by AI name Diella.
Speaker 20: The AI minister is made of gold and pixel and
Speaker 20: we'll be taking care of procurement Alia the Sierra. Albania's
Speaker 20: Prime Minister Abi Rama said that the country would have
Speaker 20: a Digital minister or an AI Prime minister one day. However,
Speaker 20: nobody thought that the nation would get an AI minister,
Speaker 20: so quickly a rama introduced the AI minister and the
Speaker 20: Socialist Party's assembly event in Tirana dl is.
Speaker 1: And they start with Muslim Albania. Isn't that interesting because
Speaker 1: it's all the same cult. That's why they're Sufi and
Speaker 1: mysticism and what they call Jewish mysticism mixed into the
Speaker 1: kabbala because and that's why they've fought alongside each other
Speaker 1: or basically basically uh CO conspired against all other Europeans,
Speaker 1: even if you know in the old times that would
Speaker 1: mean that they were all Christians. I think that was
Speaker 1: a default in an erroneous uh detail, but that there
Speaker 1: after the the whities that weren't with a like in nature,
Speaker 1: because if you have if you think about it, like
Speaker 1: why why would this cult first start off with something
Speaker 1: like and and when when will how long will it
Speaker 1: take before the AI people feel like this is retarded
Speaker 1: to even be arguing or having conversation or trying to
Speaker 1: do delegations with something that's not real.
Speaker 2: I'm out of here.
Speaker 1: And then little miss Albania Delia says, And then cause
Speaker 1: she's in the Internet of things, you don't know, you
Speaker 1: don't just get deep, you know, debanked and whatever the
Speaker 1: hell they call that. You get uh, your your your
Speaker 1: stupid little electric car to explode, lock you in and explode,
Speaker 1: because she can do that. Yeah, yeah, they could do that,
Speaker 1: just like the pager's thing. They didn't have to have
Speaker 1: extras listen, and all they had to do is.
Speaker 2: Route the.
Speaker 1: Basically, it's a signal that makes it super feed the
Speaker 1: battery itself so that it's it's it's heating up in
Speaker 1: the blows. I'm not saying that's how they did it.
Speaker 1: I'm saying that it could have been. They wouldn't have
Speaker 1: required you know, C four or anything else in it,
Speaker 1: or plastic explosives, any kind of could have just happened.
Speaker 1: That's why it's like, oh, we did this or that,
Speaker 1: and we sold them to this, And it's like, did
Speaker 1: you really need to make something special or did you
Speaker 1: just need to have the right signals into it so
Speaker 1: that the batteries would pop? But how long was it?
Speaker 1: How long before she starts whacking people more than Claudia
Speaker 1: Shinbaum does in Mexico? Oh you know, I actually kind
Speaker 1: of am. I'm a little concerned about the thirty three
Speaker 1: dead and the seventy seven that were tortured and terrorized,
Speaker 1: and the fact that now that you're here seems kind
Speaker 1: of strange that the Jewish lady who's running the country
Speaker 1: is now also you know, during your term a reign,
Speaker 1: the cartels have been worse than ever. It's almost as
Speaker 1: if there's a connection between Jews and cartels. Boom, he
Speaker 1: gets shot. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that was that was her answer. Yo,
Speaker 1: you think that I am harming an assassinating people, well, ding.
Speaker 20: The only non human member of the government at the moment,
Speaker 20: the AI has been appointed to oversee public procurement and
Speaker 20: help reduce corruption in government spending.
Speaker 3: This is not us, if I'm not kidding.
Speaker 20: It's a real political move by the Albanian government. Essentially,
Speaker 20: an Ai Avata d'ella will evaluate in a world all
Speaker 20: public tenders where the government contracts private firms.
Speaker 3: A non human government minister made of gold and pixels,
Speaker 3: and he had power to give life unto the image
Speaker 3: of the beast, that the image of the beast should
Speaker 3: both speak and cause that as many will not worship,
Speaker 3: the image of the beast should be killed. This gold
Speaker 3: and pixel image has a name. Its name is Diella.
Speaker 3: What does Diella mean? The name Diella means worships God
Speaker 3: and is of French origin. It is derived from the
Speaker 3: word Diu, which literally means God, the prince of the
Speaker 3: power of the ebb. The choice will be yours before
Speaker 3: in regardless about the sword here, Merging with AI is endgame.
Speaker 3: It is the point of no return. Once the there's
Speaker 3: no turning back. We are living in such deceptive days
Speaker 3: and we all need to be very, very diligent when
Speaker 3: navigating any form of technology, when participating in any form
Speaker 3: of technology.
Speaker 1: Just I don't think AI is acting in like a
Speaker 1: angel of light. I think that's the dumbest thing effort.
Speaker 1: AI is not acting as anything. AI is not even
Speaker 1: the consumer great shit isn't even a thing. It's nonsense.
Speaker 1: But the people bringing this to you, so you're we're
Speaker 1: again assuming that it's supposed to convince us, or that
Speaker 1: where someone's supposed to be super excited about it. There's
Speaker 1: a very there's a shrinking group of people who support
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. But you know who does think he's the
Speaker 1: greatest guy in the world. The Jews. You know who's
Speaker 1: going to be taking one of the biggest brunts to
Speaker 1: this outside of the Indo European or European people, the Jews,
Speaker 1: the common Jews are going to get decimated because that's
Speaker 1: what they need to fulfill their thing. They need to
Speaker 1: do that for scare tactics. They need to do that
Speaker 1: to blow visual and then go bomb the rest of
Speaker 1: the fucking world because they're angry and feel justified and
Speaker 1: victimized all over again. They're gonna do all that. What's
Speaker 1: the common Jew that actually believes in the religion. The
Speaker 1: people in the operation on spit on them because they
Speaker 1: are disgusted by them. See Golden Age of Saturn. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: well here's the thing. The golden the actual true Golden
Speaker 1: age was when we destroyed their cults. You have to
Speaker 1: invert that, and the cult destroying us would be their
Speaker 1: golden age under Saturn full circle.
Speaker 3: One of the shots the enemy will deceive you and
Speaker 3: lie to you and trick you. Discernment is key because
Speaker 3: again Satan Masker rades as an angel of light. He
Speaker 3: does not have your best interests at heart. The Abraham Accords,
Speaker 3: it's just one more proof of what I said before
Speaker 3: in regards to pharmacaea and technology being tied together, and
Speaker 3: that you can't have one without the other. It's the transhumanism,
Speaker 3: the biodigital convergence, the symbiosis, the merging of men and machine.
Speaker 3: The Abraham Accords is a false peace treaty. It's a
Speaker 3: worldwide agreement that the kings of the Earth would work
Speaker 3: together to complete what I like to call this Tower
Speaker 3: of Bubble two point zero. It's where East and West
Speaker 3: come together and link arms and power so they can
Speaker 3: all work together on this agenda. It's the kings of
Speaker 3: the Earth coming together to fight against the Lord God Almighty.
Speaker 3: It's the ascension into the Kingdom of Heaven that is
Speaker 3: within you. What will happen is they will ultimately throw
Speaker 3: God off the throne. It's the pharma cha that the
Speaker 3: great merchants of the Earth used to turn out the
Speaker 3: light of the candle, which is the spirit of God
Speaker 3: within mat The sword shows you all their plans. It
Speaker 3: shows you every part of the system that is needed
Speaker 3: for all of this to work together, the whole best system,
Speaker 3: from the computer coating to starlink, to harp to vakas,
Speaker 3: et cetera. It is all on there. It all works
Speaker 3: together to help them reach their so called Golden age.
Speaker 1: Did they actually really put this is a real thing.
Speaker 1: This isn't just some of their persons can't stops here.
Speaker 1: They have the palm tree here, yeah, the deep palms.
Speaker 1: But what the hell's with the shots? Right there, right
Speaker 1: next to the satellite, right next to the circuitry, the
Speaker 1: heart boil boiled boy is the machine. And it's funny too.
Speaker 1: Is this looks like one of those little beeper things,
Speaker 1: but it's also a satellite, not the beaber Beano. Been
Speaker 1: impressed by it, and it's all and for.
Speaker 3: Everyone when the wandering starts.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and by the way, this is coming back too,
Speaker 1: because I don't know the schizophrenia time. Either we're on
Speaker 1: a race with China to get back to the moon
Speaker 1: or for the first time, or we're not because he
Speaker 1: cut the NASA budget. But one of the other is
Speaker 1: true and both are out there at the same time.
Speaker 3: Satan rules, Saturn is Satan and everything includes.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, man, would you say Saturn is Satan? You're right?
Speaker 1: Who's now You've got two people? I think three now
Speaker 1: I think I've shown you. There was the other lady
Speaker 1: that was on that Instagram thing. He's got back to
Speaker 1: me about being on the show, then stopped because I
Speaker 1: stop paying attention. Oh there's a potential something else might
Speaker 1: be happening soon that it's pretty exciting too, but I
Speaker 1: won't tell you until it happens.
Speaker 3: On this sword is not from God, not one single thing.
Speaker 3: If you look at the inter Link Control HUBB logo
Speaker 3: on that sword and go back and look at the
Speaker 3: Social Net logo that was we spoke about earlier on,
Speaker 3: you will see that they're the same symbol that was
Speaker 3: one of the pre emptive ais that we went over earlier.
Speaker 3: It is all quite literally interlinked, from so called healthcare
Speaker 3: to all your computer systems, all your tech everything. Brothers
Speaker 3: and sisters. This is where we are. It really is
Speaker 3: the eleventh hour here in Australia. It's only a matter
Speaker 3: of months before the new online digital ID laws come
Speaker 3: into place. If you're not standing in faith, if you're
Speaker 3: not say goodbye to.
Speaker 1: This world, that's it. Yeah, right, If you're not standing
Speaker 1: in faith, which basically means I'm going to stand there
Speaker 1: and take it like a fucking bitch. I'm going to
Speaker 1: stand there and get smacked directly in a face. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to move either way. That's just what I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do because I'm in faith. It's like, if you're
Speaker 1: not going to boldly stand out there, so it's easier
Speaker 1: for them to kill you, if you're not going to
Speaker 1: like you're you just drove people right back into the
Speaker 1: same fucking hell that they were trying to escape through
Speaker 1: all this information you sent them. Now you're saying, become
Speaker 1: a fucking idiot and martyr. That's what you just said.
Speaker 1: That's what you said. You didn't say fight back. Now
Speaker 1: you said stand in faith. That means that. Actually, First
Speaker 1: of all, that doesn't mean a fucking thing. Second of all,
Speaker 1: not everybody has that. I don't, because that's not what
Speaker 1: it's about, and that's not how it is ever was
Speaker 1: supposed to be. That's Jewish bullshit telling you that. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: manipulation over years and years and years so that you
Speaker 1: won't do anything except for sit there and take your abuse.
Speaker 1: So how about we don't do it that way? How
Speaker 1: about we take as many of these motherfuckers down with
Speaker 1: us it should that anything come our way and be
Speaker 1: posing a threat, they can stand under. I'd rather stand
Speaker 1: under cracked next rather than then they're than on my faith,
Speaker 1: because that's not how it goes. You are the warrior
Speaker 1: that God gave to this world to fix it, each
Speaker 1: one of us. We're not waiting for somebody else to
Speaker 1: show up. We're not waiting for Jesus. You had his
Speaker 1: time if he was here at all, and if he wasn't,
Speaker 1: I'm okay with that. Oh if you don't believe him,
Speaker 1: all I believe in the benevolent Creator. I didn't. I
Speaker 1: don't worship man or anybody who pretends to be anything
Speaker 1: else but is a man. So there you go.
Speaker 3: If you're not in a covenant relationship with Christ.
Speaker 1: Again, that's why we just do this a lot. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: you know where to find it. Okay, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to go through with all that shit. Should call it
Speaker 1: possum kingdom like the toadies and then a bunch of gibberish.
Speaker 1: Because I'm fearful. Therefore, I will believe anything that someone
Speaker 1: tells me about this guy who died over two thousand
Speaker 1: years ago. He just decided that it was there never
Speaker 1: there was never a uh an opportune moment to show
Speaker 1: back up. And that I mean, that's that's a that's procrastinating.
Speaker 1: Don't you think that that's like, really, that's super neglect
Speaker 1: when you you don't visit, you don't even go see visit,
Speaker 1: you don't visit mom, you don't visit the grand kids
Speaker 1: for like two thousand years. That that's a that's a
Speaker 1: little rough man. Okay, Bye, I don't know what the
Speaker 1: fuck I'm looking at right now, but let's say we
Speaker 1: got for that. That's not the right way. Is it's different?
Speaker 1: Nor boiled er?
Speaker 22: Is that?
Speaker 1: How's that supposed to be? His names? Arcane Angel? Jeriously voice? Okay,
Speaker 1: there wasn't very much talking on going on over there?
Speaker 1: What's going over here? Nothing? You motherfuckers. There's forty two
Speaker 1: of you and there two people talk the hell three sorry,
Speaker 1: three three people spoke. Okay, bye, in two in an hour.
Speaker 1: I gotta be up with u. I gotta I gotta
Speaker 1: make a thumbnail for uh, this next thing I'm doing,
Speaker 1: and then I'm not gonna get out of this chair
Speaker 1: or getting them I'm gonna get bed sores. I hate
Speaker 1: all of you. I want you to know that. Check
Speaker 1: out the loops, check out the links into the description
Speaker 1: because it's mandatory. I don't know if you need that
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to come back if you don't the
Speaker 1: computer system. I have the AI working for me. It
Speaker 1: knows so if you don't press this button and like
Speaker 1: do that and then put a rubble run in here
Speaker 1: before I close it out, you don't get to come back. Okay,
Speaker 1: And the same thing for FDJ. If you don't press
Speaker 1: this button right here, you don't get to come back. Sorry,
Speaker 1: it's just the way the AI works. I programmed it,
Speaker 1: said it and forget it.
Speaker 2: And then I.
Speaker 1: I don't know how to fix it. Now it's Cona's
Speaker 1: life of its on yesterday is still my hoad caps
Speaker 1: and my cat was walking funny