WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.839
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:02.839 --> 00:00:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. When the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was breaking once again,

3
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:10.679
<v Speaker 1>all the way back in July of last year, I

4
00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>told you that things were going to get hectic over

5
00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:18.519
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, and boy have they become hectic. The

6
00:00:18.559 --> 00:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>situation over in the UK is not only growing by

7
00:00:21.480 --> 00:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the day, but it's putting a lot of people in

8
00:00:24.199 --> 00:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>serious jeopardy. There's a lot of questions now about why

9
00:00:29.320 --> 00:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>people look the other way and why the Metropolitan Police

10
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:35.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't step in to stop what was going on sooner.

11
00:00:36.520 --> 00:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, but according to polling, the Royal

12
00:00:41.079 --> 00:00:44.759
<v Speaker 1>family's approval ratings are the worse they've been in decades.

13
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Then you add to the mix that Starmer has a

14
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>lot going on as far as people trying to get

15
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:54.679
<v Speaker 1>rid of him, and you got the perfect environment for

16
00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:58.079
<v Speaker 1>some shit to pop off. So today we have an

17
00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>article from the Eastern Herald dot com and the headline

18
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Epstein files are tearing Britain's institutions apart and the polling

19
00:01:06.760 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 1>proves it. This article was authored by the europe Desk.

20
00:01:11.599 --> 00:01:14.359
<v Speaker 1>The first question is not about Jeffrey Epstein, It's about

21
00:01:14.359 --> 00:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what kind of country allows this much to happen and

22
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>still can't name who bears responsibility. And I think that's

23
00:01:20.040 --> 00:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a pretty fair question. Somebody made the choice to look

24
00:01:23.359 --> 00:01:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the other way, somebody made the choice to protect them.

25
00:01:26.359 --> 00:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Who's at somebody? And it's the same question we ask

26
00:01:29.319 --> 00:01:32.079
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. There's all these people involved

27
00:01:32.079 --> 00:01:34.599
<v Speaker 1>in protecting this dude. How come we don't know who

28
00:01:34.680 --> 00:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they are? And don't give me that, Oh, it's a

29
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:41.719
<v Speaker 1>nameless bureaucrat BS. That's nonsense. I think we've already disproved

30
00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that time and time again. That's the question now hanging

31
00:01:46.159 --> 00:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>over Britain, and it has no clean answer. The Epstein files,

32
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>roughly three million documents released by the US Department of

33
00:01:53.040 --> 00:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Justice since January of twenty twenty six, have not merely

34
00:01:56.599 --> 00:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>damaged reputations. They've done something more durable. They have quantified

35
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in polling data, in parliamentary votes and resignation letters, the

36
00:02:06.519 --> 00:02:09.159
<v Speaker 1>degree to which the British public no longer trusts the

37
00:02:09.159 --> 00:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>state that governs it. And it's the same shit we're

38
00:02:11.719 --> 00:02:16.439
<v Speaker 1>dealing with here in America. All of these institutions nobody

39
00:02:16.439 --> 00:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>trusts them, and that's the big problem. If you can't

40
00:02:20.439 --> 00:02:23.479
<v Speaker 1>trust the Department of Justice to go after people like Epstein,

41
00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>then what are we even doing here? No single institution

42
00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:33.439
<v Speaker 1>has been spared. The monarchy, Parliament and Metro Police have

43
00:02:33.560 --> 00:02:36.199
<v Speaker 1>each absorbed body blows from the same scandal in the

44
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:41.159
<v Speaker 1>same months, with consequences that are compounding rather than settling. Look,

45
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I know it's rough, I know it sucks, and I

46
00:02:44.520 --> 00:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>know it's painful, but now's the time to pull the

47
00:02:47.560 --> 00:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>band aid off and I would love to see the

48
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>UK do that. I'd love to see them lead the way,

49
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like it's more of a cover up

50
00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and it sucks. It really sucks that we can't trust

51
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:02.479
<v Speaker 1>anybody that's in a position to go after the people

52
00:03:03.240 --> 00:03:05.039
<v Speaker 1>that should be hemmed up. But they have no one

53
00:03:05.080 --> 00:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to blame but themselves, right, They're the ones that made

54
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the choices. They're the ones that look the other way,

55
00:03:10.360 --> 00:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that shirk their responsibility, and they're the

56
00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>ones now that have to answer for it. The data

57
00:03:17.479 --> 00:03:20.599
<v Speaker 1>at this point is not subtle. According to ipso's polling

58
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>conducted between February thirteenth and sixteenth, every senior member of

59
00:03:24.840 --> 00:03:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the royal family saw personal approval ratings declined compared to

60
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:33.599
<v Speaker 1>November of twenty twenty five, support for King Charles fell

61
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>nine percentage points to forty six percent. Prince William dropped eight,

62
00:03:37.599 --> 00:03:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Princess Ann nine. Most strikingly, backing for the monarchy as

63
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>an institution slipped to forty seven percent, the first time

64
00:03:46.039 --> 00:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in modern polling it has fallen below a majority. Yo,

65
00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I've said this for how long. The monarchy is something

66
00:03:52.439 --> 00:03:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of the past, and the Queen did a lot of

67
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:58.719
<v Speaker 1>damage by protecting Andrew. I know people don't want to

68
00:03:58.719 --> 00:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>hear that. I get a lot of love for the Queen.

69
00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying she was a bad person, but she

70
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of bad decisions when it comes to Andrew.

71
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And now that bill is come and do and do

72
00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you really think that Charles is the guy to handle it,

73
00:04:14.879 --> 00:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy that's going to fix everything, that's going

74
00:04:17.079 --> 00:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to usher the monarchy into a new century. Well, if

75
00:04:20.519 --> 00:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that, you're now in the minority in the UK.

76
00:04:23.959 --> 00:04:27.759
<v Speaker 1>A separate Savanta survey for the anti monarchy group Republic

77
00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:31.199
<v Speaker 1>put institutional support for the crown at forty five percent,

78
00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>down three points in four months. Not exactly the trajectory

79
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for, And those numbers arrived before Andrew mount

80
00:04:38.680 --> 00:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Batten Windsor, the younger brother of King Charles, was arrested

81
00:04:42.360 --> 00:04:46.519
<v Speaker 1>on February nineteenth a suspicion of misconduct in public office,

82
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the first senior British royal to be taken into police

83
00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>custody in nearly four centuries. What an absolute embarrassment, all

84
00:04:56.360 --> 00:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of you out there that never lived up to your

85
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:02.319
<v Speaker 1>parents' expectations. Have no fear you pell in comparison to

86
00:05:02.319 --> 00:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Prince Andrew. Imagine being given all that privilege, all that money, wealth,

87
00:05:08.399 --> 00:05:16.879
<v Speaker 1>access and doing this with it. Absolute scumbag. Thames Valley

88
00:05:16.879 --> 00:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Police were examining whether Mount Baton Windsor, during his time

89
00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:24.759
<v Speaker 1>as UK Special Envoy for International Trade, forwarded classified government

90
00:05:24.839 --> 00:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>reports to Epstein. King Charles responded with a statement signed

91
00:05:28.680 --> 00:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Charles R. Rather than routed through Buckingham Palace. The deliberate

92
00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:38.519
<v Speaker 1>informality was its own signal the Palace was distancing itself

93
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:42.519
<v Speaker 1>by name from the King's own brother. Mount Baton Windsor

94
00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>was released under investigation after approximately eleven hours. No charges

95
00:05:47.319 --> 00:05:51.319
<v Speaker 1>have been brought. The investigation remains open and I have

96
00:05:51.399 --> 00:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>my doubts, I really have my doubts just how far

97
00:05:54.519 --> 00:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go. It should go real far right, should

98
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be real expansive, a full on league colonoscopy. But remember

99
00:06:02.959 --> 00:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about power, and power protects power. So I

100
00:06:06.879 --> 00:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have serious reservations if that's about to change. As Eastern

101
00:06:11.399 --> 00:06:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Herald reported in April, the arrest triggered a global reaction

102
00:06:15.040 --> 00:06:19.079
<v Speaker 1>precisely because it demonstrated that formal legal accountability was, at

103
00:06:19.079 --> 00:06:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a minimum possible, even for figures who had previously seemed

104
00:06:22.879 --> 00:06:29.199
<v Speaker 1>insulated by proximity to the throne. Whether the investigation ends

105
00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in charges is a question that as of June twenty

106
00:06:31.920 --> 00:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, no one inside or outside the Metropolitan Police

107
00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>has been willing to predict. Look again, I don't know.

108
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that it would, and I would hope

109
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they have the evidence to go after whoever they need to.

110
00:06:45.279 --> 00:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>But I have my doubts. The crisis that the Palace

111
00:06:48.800 --> 00:06:51.399
<v Speaker 1>would be serious enough on its own, But the Epstein

112
00:06:51.439 --> 00:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>files arrived in a country whose political class was already

113
00:06:54.839 --> 00:06:59.439
<v Speaker 1>struggling to justify itself. Kiros Starmer won the twenty twenty

114
00:06:59.439 --> 00:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>four general election with a majority of one hundred and

115
00:07:02.040 --> 00:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy two seats. Within eighteen months, IPSOS recorded his net

116
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>favorability rating at minus sixty six, the lowest for any

117
00:07:09.879 --> 00:07:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sitting prime minister since the polling firm began tracking the

118
00:07:13.399 --> 00:07:18.199
<v Speaker 1>figure in nineteen seventy seven. The mechanism of that collapse

119
00:07:18.399 --> 00:07:21.639
<v Speaker 1>runs directly through the Epstein files. In December of twenty

120
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, Starmer appointed Peter Mandelsson as the UK's ambassador

121
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to DC. Mandelssohn's social connection to Epstein was publicly known

122
00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:34.319
<v Speaker 1>before the posting was announced big time, and it wasn't

123
00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>just like a rumor. Everybody knew that Mandelsson and Epstein

124
00:07:37.720 --> 00:07:43.839
<v Speaker 1>were very close. Starmer appointed him anyway. Starmer later told

125
00:07:43.920 --> 00:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Parliament that he knew of Mandelsson's friendship with Epstein, but

126
00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:49.959
<v Speaker 1>that Mandelssohn had died repeatedly to my team when asked

127
00:07:49.959 --> 00:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure.

128
00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>He fired Mandelssohn in September twenty twenty five after emails

129
00:07:58.240 --> 00:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>emerge showing Mandelsshn had made contact with Epstein following Epstein's

130
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:06.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight conviction. So did everybody else. Let's

131
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:11.079
<v Speaker 1>not make pretend here that you know, mister mister Mandelssohn

132
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>was the only one all these scumbags did. Further document

133
00:08:15.519 --> 00:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>releases in January and June twenty twenty six deep in

134
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:23.079
<v Speaker 1>the damage. According to the Washington Post, documents released on

135
00:08:23.160 --> 00:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>June first showed mandelssh had assured Starmer the Washington appointment

136
00:08:27.800 --> 00:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>was won, the government would never regret bank statements in

137
00:08:31.480 --> 00:08:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the files. As Time reported suggested, Epstein had made payments

138
00:08:35.159 --> 00:08:38.919
<v Speaker 1>totaling seventy five thousand two accounts connected to Mandelssohn between

139
00:08:38.919 --> 00:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three and two thousand and four. Mandelsh

140
00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>resigned from the Labor Party in February twenty twenty six,

141
00:08:45.799 --> 00:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and subsequently from the House of Awards. Yeah, he was

142
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:53.279
<v Speaker 1>forced to. If he had his own way, he would

143
00:08:53.279 --> 00:08:56.039
<v Speaker 1>have stayed there forever getting rich on the public dime,

144
00:08:56.279 --> 00:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>stealing from the people of the UK. The parliamentary fallout

145
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>was severe and rapid. By May, over ninety five Labor

146
00:09:05.759 --> 00:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>MPs had called on Starmer to resign or set out

147
00:09:08.879 --> 00:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a departure timetable held Secretary west Reading resign from cabinet

148
00:09:13.480 --> 00:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on May fourteenth, telling colleagues that Starmer will not leave

149
00:09:16.600 --> 00:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party into the next general election. He stops

150
00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>short of formally triggering a leadership contest, which requires signatures

151
00:09:24.320 --> 00:09:28.159
<v Speaker 1>from one fifth of the Parliamentary Party. As of June eighth,

152
00:09:28.200 --> 00:09:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Starmer remains in office, insisting he will stay. What comes

153
00:09:32.200 --> 00:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>next is genuinely unclear. The Labor Party's internal arithmetic and

154
00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the ninety five plus pms on record suggests a resolution

155
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:45.159
<v Speaker 1>will not be tidy. And look, when it comes to politics,

156
00:09:45.480 --> 00:09:49.279
<v Speaker 1>especially in places like the UK, when is it these

157
00:09:49.320 --> 00:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are going to be looking to, you know, go

158
00:09:50.919 --> 00:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>after their opponents, just like here in America, same kind

159
00:09:54.279 --> 00:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of shit, and they're going to look to try and

160
00:09:56.720 --> 00:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on these missteps. The Metro Police faces a different

161
00:10:02.360 --> 00:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of accounting. Trust in the force had already been

162
00:10:05.200 --> 00:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>corrooting for years through scandals including the murder of Sarah

163
00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Evrard by a serving officer and the Spy Cops inquiry findings.

164
00:10:13.919 --> 00:10:16.639
<v Speaker 1>A Guardian poll in twenty twenty four placed trust in

165
00:10:16.679 --> 00:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the Metro Police at just thirty four percent. The Epstein

166
00:10:20.279 --> 00:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>files have added specific documented allegations to that general mistrust.

167
00:10:25.759 --> 00:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That met officers were present at dinner parties hosted by

168
00:10:28.879 --> 00:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mountbat and Windsor and attended by Epstein, that eighty seven

169
00:10:32.200 --> 00:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Epstein linked private flights entered and departed UK airports carrying

170
00:10:36.519 --> 00:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>unidentified female passengers without meaningful scrutiny, and that the met

171
00:10:41.399 --> 00:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>had identified a London property rented by Epstein in which

172
00:10:44.600 --> 00:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>young women were reportedly housed under conditions of financial coercion,

173
00:10:49.039 --> 00:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>trafficked and declined to investigate further on the grounds that

174
00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:55.639
<v Speaker 1>no formal criminal allegation had been made against the UK

175
00:10:55.759 --> 00:11:00.799
<v Speaker 1>based individual. That last decision, now public and document, has

176
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>been widely characterized as a failure of institutional responsibility. The

177
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:10.159
<v Speaker 1>question leaves it open whether it reflected operational caution, inadequate procedure,

178
00:11:10.360 --> 00:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>or something worse is one The Metro Police has not answered.

179
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:17.799
<v Speaker 1>The force's statement that officers had followed all reasonable lines

180
00:11:17.799 --> 00:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>of inquiry was made in a context that those lines

181
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of inquiry are now subject to parliamentary and judicial scrutiny.

182
00:11:25.039 --> 00:11:28.879
<v Speaker 1>A UK prosecutor, as Eastern Herald reported last week, warned

183
00:11:28.919 --> 00:11:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in early June that a full inquiry could take over

184
00:11:31.320 --> 00:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a year. Survivors have characterized that timeline as a continued injustice. Look,

185
00:11:37.159 --> 00:11:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I get it, they want this shit to get growing,

186
00:11:39.799 --> 00:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get cracking, as it should, but it's going to take time.

187
00:11:44.480 --> 00:11:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Taken separately, any one of these threads, the monarchy's polland collapse,

188
00:11:48.279 --> 00:11:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the Labor government's parliamentary crisis, the police unanswered questions would

189
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:58.919
<v Speaker 1>be manageable. Britain's political culture is experienced at absorbing individual scandal.

190
00:11:59.320 --> 00:12:02.879
<v Speaker 1>What makes the present moment structurally distinct is the convergence

191
00:12:03.480 --> 00:12:06.799
<v Speaker 1>all three institutions are damaged by the same source in

192
00:12:06.879 --> 00:12:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the same news cycle. If those data from April twenty

193
00:12:10.200 --> 00:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty six found that two thirds of British adults do

194
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not have confidence the government is running the country with integrity,

195
00:12:17.320 --> 00:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that figure is not the product of one scandal. It

196
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>reflects the effect of watching the institutions designed to prevent

197
00:12:24.039 --> 00:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing fail simultaneously to prevent it, and

198
00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not only that, but clean it up. It's one thing

199
00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to fail and admit, look, we fucked up. We got

200
00:12:33.639 --> 00:12:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to get our act together. That's not what happened here.

201
00:12:36.600 --> 00:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>They just keep doubling down on the bullshit, over and

202
00:12:39.039 --> 00:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. None of this has a clear

203
00:12:43.039 --> 00:12:47.639
<v Speaker 1>resolution in sight. The investigation into Mountbatten Windsor remains open.

204
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Starmer as of Monday, continues to insist he will lead

205
00:12:50.919 --> 00:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Labor into the next general election. Whether that turns out

206
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to be true is one of several things in this

207
00:12:56.559 --> 00:12:59.279
<v Speaker 1>story that no one has been able to promise with

208
00:12:59.360 --> 00:13:03.159
<v Speaker 1>a straight face. And I'm certainly no expert in UK politics,

209
00:13:03.679 --> 00:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think that eventually Starmer has to go, and

210
00:13:07.600 --> 00:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's a question of if. I

211
00:13:10.519 --> 00:13:13.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's a question of when. So like usual, we'll

212
00:13:13.840 --> 00:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on things, and when we have some

213
00:13:15.600 --> 00:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>more information one way or the other, we'll get it

214
00:13:17.759 --> 00:13:21.759
<v Speaker 1>added to the catalog. All the information that goes with

215
00:13:21.919 --> 00:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this episode can be found in the description box.