WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>The first clue was not found in a court room

2
00:00:02.439 --> 00:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>or buried in an old case file. It was found

3
00:00:04.960 --> 00:00:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in an apartment where police had expected to find a suspect.

4
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>On December eighth, twenty twenty two, officers in Montgomery County, Maryland,

5
00:00:12.919 --> 00:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>were responding to a shooting at a convenience store. A

6
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty one year old cashier identified in the supplied case

7
00:00:19.039 --> 00:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>information as Ilu, had been fatally shot during an altercation

8
00:00:22.519 --> 00:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>inside the store. Investigators initially had a straightforward question who

9
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:30.359
<v Speaker 1>had walked into the store, confronted the cashier and opened fire.

10
00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance footage quickly gave them an answer. The footage reportedly

11
00:00:34.079 --> 00:00:36.679
<v Speaker 1>showed a man leaving the store after the shooting. A

12
00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:39.799
<v Speaker 1>witness who had been nearby described seeing the suspect carrying

13
00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a firearm and a bottle of sweet tea. She contacted

14
00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>nine one one and provided police with a description while

15
00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the details were still fresh in her mind. The investigation

16
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>led officers toward a nearby apartment complex. There, investigators obtained

17
00:00:53.560 --> 00:00:57.079
<v Speaker 1>information identifying the suspected shooter as thirty one year old

18
00:00:57.159 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Tory More. But Moore's connection to the shooting was only

19
00:01:00.119 --> 00:01:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of what police were about to uncover. According

20
00:01:03.200 --> 00:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to the supplied information, Moore had already been causing problems

21
00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at the convenience store. The store manager had reportedly contacted

22
00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>police several times about his escalating behavior. There had been

23
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>previous confrontations involving employees, and on the day of the shooting,

24
00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>surveillance footage allegedly captured another dispute. The disagreement reportedly began

25
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>over a bottle of sweet tea and other merchandise. The

26
00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>situation escalated, Objects were thrown, and the cashier eventually confronted

27
00:01:29.560 --> 00:01:31.799
<v Speaker 1>More with a bar in an attempt to make him leave.

28
00:01:32.079 --> 00:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Then the firearm appeared. Investigators believed More fired several rounds,

29
00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>fatally striking Elu. By itself, that case was already serious,

30
00:01:40.480 --> 00:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>but when officers went to Moore's apartment, something immediately changed

31
00:01:43.959 --> 00:01:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the investigation. There was a strong odor inside.

32
00:01:47.640 --> 00:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Investigators followed it. Near the side of Moore's bed, they

33
00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:54.439
<v Speaker 1>discovered human remains. The condition of the remains reportedly made

34
00:01:54.439 --> 00:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it difficult at first to determine the person's identity or

35
00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>even their sex, and more was still there. Discovery raised

36
00:02:00.719 --> 00:02:03.599
<v Speaker 1>an immediate question, who was the person inside the apartment?

37
00:02:03.959 --> 00:02:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Investigators initially wondered whether the remains could belong to Moore's mother.

38
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Moore himself reportedly asked about contacting his mother, adding to

39
00:02:11.719 --> 00:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty surrounding the identity of the deceased person, but

40
00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the answer would eventually be far more personal. The remains

41
00:02:18.319 --> 00:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were identified as Denise Middleton. Denise was twenty six years old.

42
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>She had been in an on and off relationship with Moore,

43
00:02:25.080 --> 00:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and according to the supplied information, she was approximately eight

44
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half months pregnant with a baby the couple

45
00:02:30.599 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>plan to name Ezekiel. Her life had already been difficult.

46
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Denise had struggled with homelessness and had been involved in

47
00:02:36.759 --> 00:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a program intended to help her regain stability. Investigators reportedly

48
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>learned that Moore had encouraged her to leave that program.

49
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:47.159
<v Speaker 1>The relationship that followed was unstable, with the two moving

50
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:51.159
<v Speaker 1>between different places and states and repeatedly arguing. Then came

51
00:02:51.199 --> 00:02:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the final known footage of Denise. She was seen entering

52
00:02:54.159 --> 00:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>an elevator with Moore. She appeared frightened, and she would

53
00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:00.599
<v Speaker 1>never be seen alive again. For investigators, the shooting at

54
00:03:00.639 --> 00:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the convenience store had suddenly become connected to something much larger.

55
00:03:04.439 --> 00:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>They were no longer dealing with a single violent incident.

56
00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:10.039
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to understand how Denise had died, how

57
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:12.759
<v Speaker 1>long her remains had been inside the apartment, and what

58
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>had happened between her and More before that elevator ride

59
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>became the last known image of her life. Those questions

60
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:22.479
<v Speaker 1>would become central to the investigation. The questions surrounding Denise

61
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:26.159
<v Speaker 1>became even more difficult when investigators began comparing what they

62
00:03:26.199 --> 00:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>knew about her relationship with More against the account More

63
00:03:28.879 --> 00:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>gave them. More reportedly described their relationship in a way

64
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that placed much of the conflict on Denise. He spoke

65
00:03:35.159 --> 00:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about arguments, disagreements, and incidents between them, portraying himself as

66
00:03:39.879 --> 00:03:42.639
<v Speaker 1>someone who had been caught in escalating situations rather than

67
00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:46.199
<v Speaker 1>someone responsible for creating them. But investigators had another source

68
00:03:46.199 --> 00:03:49.599
<v Speaker 1>of information. They had the footage, and they had Denise's absence.

69
00:03:49.960 --> 00:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>According to the supplied case information, Denise had been struggling

70
00:03:53.240 --> 00:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with homelessness when she entered a program designed to help

71
00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>her get back on her feet. She was pregnant and

72
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:01.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to establish some of stability before the birth of

73
00:04:01.479 --> 00:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>her child. Instead, More allegedly convinced her to leave the program,

74
00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and the couple continued moving from place to place. The

75
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship became increasingly unstable. There were arguments, there was reportedly

76
00:04:13.080 --> 00:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at least one physical confrontation. Moore later described one of

77
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>those incidents during questioning, presenting his own interpretation of what

78
00:04:20.199 --> 00:04:23.319
<v Speaker 1>had happened. But there was something investigators could not overlook.

79
00:04:23.600 --> 00:04:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Denise was not there to tell them her side. She

80
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>could not explain what happened during the final days of

81
00:04:28.079 --> 00:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>her life, She could not correct Moore's version of events,

82
00:04:31.199 --> 00:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and she could not explain why she had ultimately ended

83
00:04:33.560 --> 00:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>up inside his apartment. That left investigators with a difficult

84
00:04:37.120 --> 00:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>task reconstructing a relationship from the statements of the person

85
00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>accused of killing her and from whatever physical and digital

86
00:04:43.639 --> 00:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence remained behind. The apartment itself became an important part

87
00:04:47.399 --> 00:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of that reconstruction. According to the supplied information, Denise's remains

88
00:04:51.360 --> 00:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>had been inside the apartment while Moore continued living there.

89
00:04:54.759 --> 00:04:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Investigators also reportedly found evidence connected to the broader investigation,

90
00:04:59.519 --> 00:05:03.079
<v Speaker 1>including forensic material and DNA that they believed could link

91
00:05:03.160 --> 00:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>more to the shooting at the convenience store. Meanwhile, Moore

92
00:05:06.319 --> 00:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>continued talking during questioning, investigators discussed the store shooting with him.

93
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:13.959
<v Speaker 1>He reportedly argued that the cashier had confronted him and

94
00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that the situation had escalated after the employee struck him

95
00:05:16.920 --> 00:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with a bar, but investigators did not accept that explanation

96
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:23.639
<v Speaker 1>as a justification for what happened. Surveillance footage had captured

97
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the encounter. That footage gave investigators something extremely important in

98
00:05:27.639 --> 00:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a case like this, a record that did not depend

99
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:33.319
<v Speaker 1>entirely on someone's memory. It could show what happened inside

100
00:05:33.319 --> 00:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the store, how the confrontation developed, and what more did afterward.

101
00:05:37.120 --> 00:05:39.959
<v Speaker 1>The sweet tea was also an oddly important detail. The

102
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>same type of drink that had been at the center

103
00:05:41.879 --> 00:05:45.199
<v Speaker 1>of the confrontation at the store reportedly became something more

104
00:05:45.240 --> 00:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>asked for after his arrest. Two investigators. The coincidence was

105
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:51.759
<v Speaker 1>difficult to ignore, but the store shooting was no longer

106
00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the only question. There was Denise, and there was her

107
00:05:54.519 --> 00:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>unborn child. As investigators worked to establish what had happened

108
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to her, they also had to examine the circuit stances

109
00:06:00.519 --> 00:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>leading up to her death. The relationship between Denise and

110
00:06:03.560 --> 00:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Moore was not simply a matter of two people who

111
00:06:06.040 --> 00:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>had recently met, they had a history together, and, according

112
00:06:09.279 --> 00:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to the supplied information, that history included repeated arguments, instability,

113
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and attempts by Denise to find a safer and more

114
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:20.079
<v Speaker 1>stable life. Then at some point that life ended. The

115
00:06:20.160 --> 00:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>last known footage showed Denise entering the elevator with Moore.

116
00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>She was heavily pregnant, she appeared afraid, and whatever happened

117
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:30.079
<v Speaker 1>after those elevator doors closed would have to be reconstructed

118
00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:32.959
<v Speaker 1>from evidence left behind by someone who could still speak,

119
00:06:33.199 --> 00:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but whose version of events investigators had reason to question.

120
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>That evidence would become increasingly important because the investigation was

121
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:42.759
<v Speaker 1>no longer based on a single witness or a single

122
00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:46.519
<v Speaker 1>piece of footage. Investigators were assembling different fragments of the

123
00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:49.759
<v Speaker 1>same story and asking whether those fragments could fit together.

124
00:06:50.120 --> 00:06:52.439
<v Speaker 1>At the center of it all was Moore's explanation of

125
00:06:52.439 --> 00:06:56.399
<v Speaker 1>what had happened with Denise. During questioning, he reportedly acknowledged

126
00:06:56.399 --> 00:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that the two had been together and that their relationship

127
00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:03.519
<v Speaker 1>had become complicated. He described arguments and physical confrontations, but

128
00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:07.079
<v Speaker 1>his account placed emphasis on circumstances that he believed explained

129
00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:11.279
<v Speaker 1>his actions. Investigators, however, were looking at the situation from

130
00:07:11.319 --> 00:07:14.839
<v Speaker 1>another angle. They had found Denise's remains inside the apartment,

131
00:07:15.160 --> 00:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they knew she had been pregnant, and they had information

132
00:07:17.720 --> 00:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that she had been frightened during the final known

133
00:07:20.199 --> 00:07:23.439
<v Speaker 1>encounter captured on video. The question was no longer simply

134
00:07:23.439 --> 00:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>whether More in Denise had argued. The question was what

135
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:29.759
<v Speaker 1>happened after those arguments ended. More reportedly told investigators that

136
00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Denise was still alive when he last left her. That statement,

137
00:07:33.319 --> 00:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>if accurately represented in the supplied case material, became one

138
00:07:36.720 --> 00:07:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of the most important claims to test against the physical evidence,

139
00:07:40.279 --> 00:07:43.519
<v Speaker 1>because once investigators know a person is dead, the timeline

140
00:07:43.519 --> 00:07:46.759
<v Speaker 1>becomes everything. When was the victim last seen alive, who

141
00:07:46.879 --> 00:07:49.079
<v Speaker 1>was with her, where did she go, how long could

142
00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>she have remained alive, and what evidence could establish what

143
00:07:52.079 --> 00:07:55.319
<v Speaker 1>happened during the missing period. For Denise, that period was

144
00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:58.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly significant because she had no opportunity to describe what

145
00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:02.759
<v Speaker 1>happened herself. Investigators therefore had to rely on the apartment,

146
00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:07.279
<v Speaker 1>surveillance footage, forensic evidence, and the statements surrounding the relationship.

147
00:08:07.519 --> 00:08:10.839
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, the convenience store investigation was developing

148
00:08:10.879 --> 00:08:15.319
<v Speaker 1>its own evidentiary trail. Police reportedly recovered shell casings from

149
00:08:15.319 --> 00:08:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the scene and examined them alongside evidence connected to more

150
00:08:18.879 --> 00:08:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Investigators also discussed DNA evidence, including what they described as

151
00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:27.079
<v Speaker 1>touch DNA, which can sometimes provide identifying information from material

152
00:08:27.160 --> 00:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>left behind through physical contact. The significance of that evidence

153
00:08:30.639 --> 00:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>depended on what was actually recovered, where it was recovered,

154
00:08:33.679 --> 00:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and how it compared with known samples, but investigators appeared

155
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:40.279
<v Speaker 1>confident that the forensic work could strengthen their case. That

156
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>mattered because Moore had continued to characterize the store incident

157
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>as something that happened because another man had confronted him,

158
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>investigators saw the events differently. The surveillance footage provided a

159
00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>record of the confrontation, and according to the supplied information,

160
00:08:54.080 --> 00:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>officers believed it contradicted more suggestion that he had simply

161
00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:00.759
<v Speaker 1>been defending himself. But even as the evidence surrounding the

162
00:09:00.799 --> 00:09:04.919
<v Speaker 1>store's shooting became clearer, Denise's death remained the more haunting mystery.

163
00:09:05.200 --> 00:09:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Why was she inside Moore's apartment, why had she remained

164
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 1>there while he continued living in the same space, and

165
00:09:10.559 --> 00:09:13.039
<v Speaker 1>what happened between the last footage of Denise and the

166
00:09:13.080 --> 00:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>moment investigators discovered her remains. There was another heartbreaking detail

167
00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:20.639
<v Speaker 1>investigators had to confront. Denise had been preparing for the

168
00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>arrival of her son. She reportedly wanted to build a

169
00:09:23.480 --> 00:09:25.639
<v Speaker 1>family and had been looking toward a future that would

170
00:09:25.639 --> 00:09:30.039
<v Speaker 1>include her child. Instead, investigators were now reconstructing the final

171
00:09:30.120 --> 00:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>days of a woman who had disappeared from that future entirely.

172
00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>The apartment had become a crime scene, the convenience store

173
00:09:36.360 --> 00:09:39.039
<v Speaker 1>had become another and more stood at the intersection of

174
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:43.159
<v Speaker 1>both investigations. For detectives, the challenge was no longer simply

175
00:09:43.200 --> 00:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>identifying the suspect. They needed to establish what could be proven,

176
00:09:46.960 --> 00:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>separate evidence from Moore's explanations, and determine exactly how Denise's

177
00:09:51.039 --> 00:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>final hours unfolded. Because somewhere between the elevator footage and

178
00:09:54.759 --> 00:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the discovery inside that apartment was the missing sequence of

179
00:09:57.759 --> 00:10:00.279
<v Speaker 1>events that could explain how a woman so clear close

180
00:10:00.360 --> 00:10:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to giving birth ended up becoming the second victim in

181
00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>an investigation that had begun with a bottle of sweet

182
00:10:05.679 --> 00:10:08.799
<v Speaker 1>tea and a gunshot, and that missing sequence became the

183
00:10:08.840 --> 00:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>focus of the investigator's attention. The more they examined Moore's account,

184
00:10:12.759 --> 00:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the more important the timeline became. His statements could be

185
00:10:15.759 --> 00:10:19.759
<v Speaker 1>compared against surveillance footage, physical evidence, and the circumstances in

186
00:10:19.799 --> 00:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which Denise was found. Every detail mattered because a single

187
00:10:23.120 --> 00:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>contradiction could change how investigators understood the final days of

188
00:10:26.720 --> 00:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>her life. More reportedly continued to describe the relationship as complicated.

189
00:10:31.320 --> 00:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He spoke about arguments and incidents in which he claimed

190
00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Denise had confronted him or attempted to create a scene.

191
00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Investigators listened, but they were not simply accepting his interpretation.

192
00:10:41.240 --> 00:10:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Their job was to determine what could actually be supported.

193
00:10:44.159 --> 00:10:47.519
<v Speaker 1>That distinction mattered. A person's explanation of a violent event

194
00:10:47.759 --> 00:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is not the same thing as proof of what happened,

195
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, there was a woman who could

196
00:10:52.759 --> 00:10:55.919
<v Speaker 1>never provide her own account. According to the supplied information,

197
00:10:56.200 --> 00:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Denise had been struggling to find stability before her death.

198
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Her pregnant and seat made that situation even more urgent.

199
00:11:02.799 --> 00:11:05.159
<v Speaker 1>She was approaching the end of her pregnancy, and the

200
00:11:05.240 --> 00:11:08.799
<v Speaker 1>future she had been preparing for was close enough to imagine. Instead,

201
00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>her remains were discovered beside the bed where Moore had

202
00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>continued living. The investigator's discovery also raised questions about time.

203
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>How long had Denise been there, what had more done

204
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.039
<v Speaker 1>during that period, who, if anyone, knew that she was missing,

205
00:11:22.360 --> 00:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and why had nobody intervened before police entered the apartment

206
00:11:25.679 --> 00:11:29.279
<v Speaker 1>because of an entirely different investigation. Those questions gave the

207
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:32.639
<v Speaker 1>case an unsettling dimension. The shooting at the convenience store

208
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:36.399
<v Speaker 1>had effectively exposed something investigators might otherwise have taken much

209
00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:39.279
<v Speaker 1>longer to discover. If Moore had not allegedly shot eye

210
00:11:39.320 --> 00:11:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Lou on December eighth, police might not have had an

211
00:11:41.759 --> 00:11:45.399
<v Speaker 1>immediate reason to identify him, locate his apartment, and enter

212
00:11:45.440 --> 00:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the place where Denise was found. One violent incident had

213
00:11:48.519 --> 00:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>led investigators directly to another. The investigation also revealed how

214
00:11:52.799 --> 00:11:55.879
<v Speaker 1>many warning signs had surrounded Moore before the shooting. The

215
00:11:55.919 --> 00:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>store manager had reportedly contacted police multiple times about his behavior.

216
00:12:00.360 --> 00:12:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Employees had allegedly experienced confrontations with him before December eighth.

217
00:12:04.919 --> 00:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Yet those earlier incidents had not prevented the confrontation that

218
00:12:08.360 --> 00:12:12.279
<v Speaker 1>ultimately ended with Ailu's death. Now investigators had to reconstruct

219
00:12:12.279 --> 00:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what had gone wrong at the convenience store. Surveillance footage

220
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>offered a relatively clear sequence. Moore entered the business, took

221
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a bottle of sweet Tea and became involved in a

222
00:12:21.759 --> 00:12:25.759
<v Speaker 1>dispute with the cashier. The confrontation escalated and Alieu was

223
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:29.399
<v Speaker 1>fatally shot. Afterward, More reportedly walked away from the store.

224
00:12:29.679 --> 00:12:33.279
<v Speaker 1>A witness saw him. Police received a description. Surveillance footage

225
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>helped establish where he went, and that trail brought officers

226
00:12:36.360 --> 00:12:41.039
<v Speaker 1>to his apartment. Inside. However, the investigation changed forever. The

227
00:12:41.120 --> 00:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>remains discovered there belonged to Denise Middleton. She was not

228
00:12:44.480 --> 00:12:47.159
<v Speaker 1>simply another name connected to Moore. She was the woman

229
00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>who had been carrying his child, the woman whose final

230
00:12:49.879 --> 00:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>known image showed her entering an elevator with him. For investigators,

231
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the contrast was difficult to ignore. The footage showed Denise alive,

232
00:12:57.480 --> 00:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the apartment showed what happened afterward, but the exact chain

233
00:13:00.440 --> 00:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of events between those two points still had to be established,

234
00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and Moore's own words would become part of that effort.

235
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Investigators continued questioning him, testing his explanations, and looking for

236
00:13:10.679 --> 00:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>details that could be independently verified. Because the central question

237
00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:17.799
<v Speaker 1>was no longer whether Denise had died. That was already known.

238
00:13:18.080 --> 00:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The question was how her final hours unfolded, and whether

239
00:13:21.120 --> 00:13:24.519
<v Speaker 1>the evidence could establish Moore's responsibility for her death beyond

240
00:13:24.559 --> 00:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>his competing explanations. That distinction would become critical as the

241
00:13:28.559 --> 00:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>case moved forward. As investigators continued working through the evidence,

242
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>they were left with two separate crime scenes that appeared

243
00:13:35.399 --> 00:13:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to be connected by the same man. At the convenience store,

244
00:13:38.440 --> 00:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>there was surveillance footage, eyewitness information, and forensic evidence surrounding

245
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the death of Ilieu. Inside the apartment, there were Denise's

246
00:13:45.799 --> 00:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>remains and the complicated history between her and Moore. The

247
00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>challenge was proving exactly what happened in each location. For

248
00:13:52.799 --> 00:13:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Ilu's death, the sequence appeared comparatively straightforward. A dispute began

249
00:13:57.320 --> 00:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>inside the store, More reportedly became involved in an argument

250
00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>with the cashier. The confrontation escalated, and Moore fired the weapon,

251
00:14:04.840 --> 00:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but Moore's explanation reportedly attempted to place the shooting in

252
00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the context of a confrontation. Investigators did not appear persuaded.

253
00:14:12.480 --> 00:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They had the surveillance footage, and that footage allowed them

254
00:14:15.159 --> 00:14:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to compare Moore's account against what actually happened inside the store.

255
00:14:18.559 --> 00:14:22.039
<v Speaker 1>It also helped establish his movements afterward. That evidence became

256
00:14:22.159 --> 00:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>especially important because the investigation had begun with a witness

257
00:14:25.480 --> 00:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>who did not know More personally. She simply saw a

258
00:14:28.039 --> 00:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>man leaving the store. She remembered what he looked like.

259
00:14:30.960 --> 00:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>She called police, and that description helped give investigators their

260
00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>first path toward identifying him. Then came the apartment. The

261
00:14:37.919 --> 00:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>discovery of Denise meant investigators had to go backward in time.

262
00:14:41.720 --> 00:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They had to understand the relationship, the movements of both people,

263
00:14:45.240 --> 00:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and the circumstances surrounding Denise's final days. According to the

264
00:14:48.879 --> 00:14:52.639
<v Speaker 1>supplied information, Moore and Denise had moved between different locations

265
00:14:52.639 --> 00:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and states. Their relationship was unstable, and their arguments sometimes

266
00:14:57.200 --> 00:15:01.039
<v Speaker 1>became physical. More reportedly described one confrontation in which he

267
00:15:01.080 --> 00:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>claimed Denise had pushed or struck him, and that he

268
00:15:03.519 --> 00:15:06.679
<v Speaker 1>was attempting to restrain her, but investigators had reason to

269
00:15:06.759 --> 00:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>question whether that account represented the complete story. The final

270
00:15:10.279 --> 00:15:13.799
<v Speaker 1>known footage of Denise became particularly significant. She was seen

271
00:15:13.840 --> 00:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>accompanying More toward the apartment. She appeared frightened. There was

272
00:15:17.519 --> 00:15:20.279
<v Speaker 1>no indication from that footage that she was willingly walking

273
00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:23.399
<v Speaker 1>into a situation that would end her life, but appearance

274
00:15:23.399 --> 00:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>alone could not establish what happened afterward. Investigators needed evidence.

275
00:15:27.720 --> 00:15:31.919
<v Speaker 1>They examined the apartment, They reviewed available video, They questioned more,

276
00:15:32.240 --> 00:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They considered forensic findings, and they attempted to build a

277
00:15:35.240 --> 00:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>timeline that could survive scrutiny. Meanwhile, the pregnancy added another

278
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>layer to the investigation. Denise was reportedly about eight and

279
00:15:42.919 --> 00:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a half months pregnant, The child was expected soon, and

280
00:15:46.120 --> 00:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the couple had reportedly discussed naming him Ezekiel. That meant

281
00:15:49.519 --> 00:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the loss extended beyond Denise herself. There was a child

282
00:15:52.759 --> 00:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>who would never be born into the future she had

283
00:15:55.159 --> 00:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>been preparing for. For detectives and those who knew Denise,

284
00:15:58.759 --> 00:16:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that reality made the case especially difficult to process. Yet

285
00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:06.159
<v Speaker 1>investigations cannot be solved by emotion alone. The evidence had

286
00:16:06.159 --> 00:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to establish what happened. That was why more statements mattered

287
00:16:09.159 --> 00:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so much. Investigators reportedly tried different approaches during questioning. Rather

288
00:16:14.039 --> 00:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>than immediately confronting him with every piece of evidence, they

289
00:16:17.440 --> 00:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes allowed him to explain events in his own words.

290
00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He continued talking about the store incident and his relationship

291
00:16:23.639 --> 00:16:28.759
<v Speaker 1>with Denise. At times, investigators reportedly appeared sympathetic, even suggesting

292
00:16:28.799 --> 00:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>explanations that might make more and more comfortable discussing what happened.

293
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But behind those conversations was a simple investigative strategy. They

294
00:16:36.240 --> 00:16:39.759
<v Speaker 1>were listening for inconsistencies, they were comparing his words against

295
00:16:39.799 --> 00:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what they already knew, and they were waiting to see

296
00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>whether more would provide information that only someone involved could

297
00:16:45.320 --> 00:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonably know. The case had started with a shooting at

298
00:16:47.840 --> 00:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a convenience store, but by this point investigators were trying

299
00:16:51.240 --> 00:16:54.519
<v Speaker 1>to reconstruct the life and death of Denise Middleton, a

300
00:16:54.519 --> 00:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>pregnant twenty six year old whose final known moments had

301
00:16:57.360 --> 00:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>been captured on video, and somewhere within that time line

302
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was the answer to the question that mattered most, what

303
00:17:03.200 --> 00:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>happened after the elevator doors closed. The elevator footage could

304
00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:08.799
<v Speaker 1>show where Denise was going, but it could not show

305
00:17:08.839 --> 00:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what happened after the doors opened. That gap in the

306
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:14.559
<v Speaker 1>timeline became one of the most important pieces of the investigation.

307
00:17:14.920 --> 00:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>By then, detectives knew that Denise had entered the apartment

308
00:17:18.039 --> 00:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with Moore. They knew she was later found dead inside.

309
00:17:20.799 --> 00:17:23.759
<v Speaker 1>They also knew that Moore had remained in the apartment afterward.

310
00:17:24.039 --> 00:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>What they did not have was a complete, independently verified

311
00:17:27.119 --> 00:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>account of the events that connected those moments. More statements

312
00:17:30.440 --> 00:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>therefore came under increasing scrutiny. He reportedly maintained that there

313
00:17:34.240 --> 00:17:37.279
<v Speaker 1>had been conflict between him and Denise, and he attempted

314
00:17:37.279 --> 00:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>to describe their relationship as a series of arguments in

315
00:17:40.119 --> 00:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which both sides played a role. But investigators were not

316
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>interested in simply deciding who had won an argument. They

317
00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>were trying to determine how Denise died. The difference was enormous.

318
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>A disagreement could explain tension, it could not, by itself,

319
00:17:53.559 --> 00:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>explain to death, and it could not explain why Denise's

320
00:17:56.440 --> 00:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>remains were discovered inside the apartment. Investigators also had had

321
00:18:00.160 --> 00:18:03.039
<v Speaker 1>to consider the possibility that some details of Moore's account

322
00:18:03.079 --> 00:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were designed to shift responsibility away from himself. That is

323
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>why they continued comparing his statements with physical and digital evidence,

324
00:18:10.279 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 1>rather than relying on his explanation alone. The apartment provided

325
00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:17.279
<v Speaker 1>another important piece of the puzzle. According to the supplied information,

326
00:18:17.640 --> 00:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Moore had been living there without functioning heat because utility

327
00:18:20.720 --> 00:18:24.559
<v Speaker 1>bills had reportedly gone unpaid for months. When police arrived,

328
00:18:24.799 --> 00:18:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Moore appeared more concerned about the cold, his clothing, his belongings,

329
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and even the money in his possession than about the

330
00:18:31.200 --> 00:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>discovery inside the bedroom. That behavior did not prove what

331
00:18:34.519 --> 00:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>had happened to Denise, but investigators could not ignore it.

332
00:18:37.880 --> 00:18:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Neither could they ignore the fact that More reportedly asked

333
00:18:40.799 --> 00:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>police to count his money multiple times while the investigation

334
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>around him was unfolding. His behavior after the discovery became

335
00:18:47.759 --> 00:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the overall picture investigators were documenting. Still, detectives

336
00:18:52.160 --> 00:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>had to remain focused on evidence. The forensic investigation continued.

337
00:18:56.279 --> 00:19:00.519
<v Speaker 1>According to the supplied information, investigators examined shell cases and

338
00:19:00.640 --> 00:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>other evidence from the convenience store. DNA evidence was also

339
00:19:04.039 --> 00:19:08.279
<v Speaker 1>discussed during questioning, including what investigators described as touch DNA.

340
00:19:08.680 --> 00:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>That evidence was potentially important because physical material left behind

341
00:19:12.279 --> 00:19:15.319
<v Speaker 1>at a crime scene can sometimes establish a connection between

342
00:19:15.319 --> 00:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a person and a location or object, But investigators still

343
00:19:19.000 --> 00:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>had to determine exactly what the evidence demonstrated. They could

344
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:25.839
<v Speaker 1>not simply assume that every forensic finding proved the entire case.

345
00:19:26.240 --> 00:19:29.279
<v Speaker 1>The same principle applied to Denise's death. The fact that

346
00:19:29.319 --> 00:19:32.599
<v Speaker 1>she was found in Moore's apartment was significant, but investigators

347
00:19:32.640 --> 00:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>still needed to establish the circumstances of her death and

348
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>determine what evidence connected more directly to it. Meanwhile, the

349
00:19:39.400 --> 00:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>store manager's earlier warnings took on a different meaning. Before

350
00:19:42.720 --> 00:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>December eighth, Moore had reportedly been known to employees. His

351
00:19:46.240 --> 00:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>behavior had allegedly escalated over time, with confrontations and disturbances

352
00:19:50.720 --> 00:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the store. The manager had reportedly contacted police repeatedly.

353
00:19:55.119 --> 00:19:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Those earlier complaints did not predict exactly what would happen

354
00:19:58.119 --> 00:20:00.839
<v Speaker 1>on December eighth, But after I louw We killed, they

355
00:20:00.880 --> 00:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>became part of the history investigators had to examine. There

356
00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>was now a documented pattern of conflict surrounding more in

357
00:20:06.960 --> 00:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the store, and there was a second death connected to

358
00:20:09.480 --> 00:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>his apartment. The investigation had moved far beyond the original

359
00:20:13.160 --> 00:20:15.799
<v Speaker 1>question of who shot a cashier. It had become an

360
00:20:15.839 --> 00:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>attempt to reconstruct two tragedies and determine whether they were

361
00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>part of a larger pattern. For Denise's family, however, the

362
00:20:23.079 --> 00:20:26.279
<v Speaker 1>investigation carried a different weight. They were not simply waiting

363
00:20:26.319 --> 00:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for detectives to identify a suspect. They were waiting for

364
00:20:29.240 --> 00:20:31.559
<v Speaker 1>answers about a woman who had been preparing to become

365
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a mother, and the closer investigators came to the end

366
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the timeline, the fewer unanswered moments remained between the

367
00:20:37.759 --> 00:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>last image of Denise alive and the discovery that she

368
00:20:40.759 --> 00:20:43.599
<v Speaker 1>would never walk out of that apartment again. The remaining

369
00:20:43.680 --> 00:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>questions could not be answered by the apartment alone. Investigators

370
00:20:47.519 --> 00:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>needed to establish a sequence that connected the evidence to

371
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the people involved. They needed to know what happened to Denise,

372
00:20:53.559 --> 00:20:55.759
<v Speaker 1>when it happened, and what role Moore played in the

373
00:20:55.799 --> 00:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>events leading to her death. That meant going back through

374
00:20:58.440 --> 00:21:02.079
<v Speaker 1>the relationship. According to the information provided, Denise had been

375
00:21:02.119 --> 00:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to rebuild her life while dealing with homelessness and pregnancy.

376
00:21:05.920 --> 00:21:09.279
<v Speaker 1>The program assisting her offered some structure, but more reportedly

377
00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>encouraged her to leave. After that, the couple moved between

378
00:21:12.680 --> 00:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>different places, and their relationship continued to deteriorate. Arguments became

379
00:21:17.160 --> 00:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>part of their lives. Moore later described some of those

380
00:21:19.720 --> 00:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>conflicts during questioning. He reportedly presented certain encounters as situations

381
00:21:24.200 --> 00:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in which Denise was aggressive toward him or attempting to

382
00:21:27.039 --> 00:21:30.039
<v Speaker 1>make him look like the aggressor, but investigators had something

383
00:21:30.079 --> 00:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>more could not control. The final surveillance footage it showed

384
00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Denise shortly before her death, and investigators reportedly believed her

385
00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:41.039
<v Speaker 1>behavior was significant. She appeared frightened as she accompanied more

386
00:21:41.079 --> 00:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>toward the apartment. That did not by itself establish exactly

387
00:21:45.079 --> 00:21:48.039
<v Speaker 1>what happened inside, but it created a stark contrast with

388
00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the way More described their relationship. For detectives, that contrast

389
00:21:52.160 --> 00:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>demanded further examination. They also had to consider the circumstances

390
00:21:56.039 --> 00:21:59.759
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Denise's pregnancy. She was reportedly approximately eight and a

391
00:21:59.799 --> 00:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>half months pregnant, The baby was expected soon, and the

392
00:22:03.240 --> 00:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>couple had reportedly discussed the name Ezekiel. The future Denise

393
00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>had been preparing for was therefore extremely close. Instead, investigators

394
00:22:10.960 --> 00:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>were examining the circumstances of her death. The tragedy was

395
00:22:14.160 --> 00:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>compounded by the fact that the investigation had not begun

396
00:22:17.079 --> 00:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because anyone had reported Denise missing. It began with another killing.

397
00:22:21.200 --> 00:22:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I Lou's death at the convenience store brought police to More,

398
00:22:24.160 --> 00:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Moore brought investigators to the apartment, and the apartment brought

399
00:22:27.440 --> 00:22:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Denise's death into the case. That chain of events was crucial.

400
00:22:31.119 --> 00:22:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Had the shooting not occurred, investigators might not have had

401
00:22:34.319 --> 00:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the same immediate reason to locate Moore's apartment. The discovery

402
00:22:37.720 --> 00:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>of Denise was therefore directly connected to the investigation that

403
00:22:41.200 --> 00:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>followed the store shooting, but investigators still had to separate

404
00:22:44.480 --> 00:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what they knew from what they suspected. They knew Ilu

405
00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:49.599
<v Speaker 1>had been killed. They knew Moore had been identified as

406
00:22:49.599 --> 00:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the person investigators believed was responsible for the shooting. They

407
00:22:52.920 --> 00:22:56.519
<v Speaker 1>knew Denise's remains were discovered inside Moore's apartment. They knew

408
00:22:56.519 --> 00:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Denise and Moore had been in a troubled relationship. They

409
00:22:59.400 --> 00:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>knew she had been heavily pregnant. They also had surveillance

410
00:23:02.519 --> 00:23:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and forensic evidence to examine what remained. Was determining precisely

411
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>how those facts connected. The interrogation became another source of information.

412
00:23:10.759 --> 00:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>More reportedly continued speaking with detectives, offering explanations for his

413
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>behavior at the store and describing his relationship with Denise.

414
00:23:18.519 --> 00:23:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Investigators listened carefully, sometimes appearing to accept his framing of

415
00:23:22.519 --> 00:23:26.559
<v Speaker 1>events before returning to specific details. That approach allowed them

416
00:23:26.599 --> 00:23:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to keep the conversation moving. More importantly, it gave them

417
00:23:29.799 --> 00:23:33.799
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to compare his statements with evidence already collected. Every

418
00:23:33.839 --> 00:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>explanation could be tested, every timeline could be checked, Every

419
00:23:37.480 --> 00:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>claim about what happened could be measured against the physical record,

420
00:23:40.759 --> 00:23:43.519
<v Speaker 1>and the investigation was no longer about whether Moore had

421
00:23:43.519 --> 00:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a troubled relationship with Denise. It was about whether the

422
00:23:46.480 --> 00:23:49.759
<v Speaker 1>evidence could establish what happened when that relationship reached its

423
00:23:49.799 --> 00:23:54.039
<v Speaker 1>final and most devastating moment for Denise's family, The unanswered

424
00:23:54.119 --> 00:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>questions were painfully simple. What happened to her? Why did

425
00:23:57.160 --> 00:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>she never make it home? And why did the final

426
00:23:59.240 --> 00:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>known footage show h entering that elevator with the man

427
00:24:01.920 --> 00:24:05.079
<v Speaker 1>who would become the central figure in the investigation. Those

428
00:24:05.160 --> 00:24:08.039
<v Speaker 1>questions remained at the heart of the case as investigators

429
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>continued assembling the evidence surrounding two deaths that had initially

430
00:24:11.920 --> 00:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be completely separate. The investigation now had to

431
00:24:15.680 --> 00:24:19.039
<v Speaker 1>move from what appeared suspicious to what could actually be established.

432
00:24:19.359 --> 00:24:23.559
<v Speaker 1>That distinction is important in any homicide investigation. A disturbing

433
00:24:23.599 --> 00:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>discovery can raise questions, but questions are not answers. Investigators

434
00:24:28.000 --> 00:24:30.839
<v Speaker 1>needed evidence capable of showing what happened to Denise and

435
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened inside the convenience store. At the store, the

436
00:24:33.960 --> 00:24:38.079
<v Speaker 1>evidence was more immediate. Surveillance footage reportedly captured the confrontation

437
00:24:38.319 --> 00:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>involving Moore and Ailu. Investigators could examine the sequence frame

438
00:24:42.240 --> 00:24:45.759
<v Speaker 1>by frame, comparing it with Moore's explanation. The witness who

439
00:24:45.759 --> 00:24:48.279
<v Speaker 1>called nine to one one had also provided a description

440
00:24:48.359 --> 00:24:51.039
<v Speaker 1>of the person she saw leaving the store. Then there

441
00:24:51.079 --> 00:24:55.319
<v Speaker 1>was the forensic evidence. Investigators reportedly recovered shell casings and

442
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>examined them alongside evidence connected to More. They also discussed

443
00:24:59.200 --> 00:25:03.039
<v Speaker 1>DNA finding during the interrogation. According to the supplied information,

444
00:25:03.400 --> 00:25:06.519
<v Speaker 1>investigators believed some of that evidence could connect More to

445
00:25:06.559 --> 00:25:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the shooting for the storecase. The pieces were beginning to

446
00:25:09.599 --> 00:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>reinforce one another, but Denise's death required a different kind

447
00:25:13.160 --> 00:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of reconstruction. There was no eyewitness account from Denise. There

448
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was no recording of everything that happened inside the apartment. Instead,

449
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>investigators had to work backward from the discovery of her

450
00:25:23.680 --> 00:25:26.559
<v Speaker 1>remains and forward from the last known footage of her alive.

451
00:25:26.960 --> 00:25:29.759
<v Speaker 1>That created a gap, and gaps are where investigators have

452
00:25:29.799 --> 00:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to be most careful. More statements occupied part of that gap,

453
00:25:33.559 --> 00:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but his version of events could not simply be accepted

454
00:25:36.440 --> 00:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>without corroboration. Investigators had to determine whether the details he

455
00:25:40.400 --> 00:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>provided matched the physical evidence. The relationship itself also became

456
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence of context. Denise had reportedly been experiencing homelessness and

457
00:25:49.039 --> 00:25:52.039
<v Speaker 1>was receiving assistance through a program intended to help her

458
00:25:52.079 --> 00:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>regain stability, more allegedly encouraged her to leave. The couple

459
00:25:56.000 --> 00:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>then moved between locations while continuing to experience conflict. Point,

460
00:26:00.720 --> 00:26:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Denise's circumstances became increasingly dangerous, yet she remained connected to

461
00:26:05.079 --> 00:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>more that may have been influenced by practical circumstances, emotional ties, pregnancy,

462
00:26:10.440 --> 00:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>or a combination of factors. The supplied information does not

463
00:26:13.880 --> 00:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>establish a single definitive reason. What investigators could establish was

464
00:26:17.920 --> 00:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that she eventually ended up inside Moore's apartment, and she

465
00:26:21.039 --> 00:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>never left alive. The final footage therefore carried enormous emotional weight.

466
00:26:25.480 --> 00:26:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Denise was not simply walking into an ordinary room. She

467
00:26:28.640 --> 00:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was approaching the place where investigators would later find her remains.

468
00:26:32.279 --> 00:26:34.839
<v Speaker 1>The footage captured a moment before the outcome was known.

469
00:26:35.119 --> 00:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>That is what made it so significant. To anyone watching afterward,

470
00:26:38.680 --> 00:26:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Every movement could feel like a warning. But investigators could

471
00:26:42.119 --> 00:26:45.079
<v Speaker 1>not allow hindsight to determine their conclusions. They had to

472
00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ask what the footage actually proved and what it merely suggested.

473
00:26:48.480 --> 00:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That distinction continued throughout the investigation. The same was true

474
00:26:52.200 --> 00:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of Moore's behavior after police discovered the remains. He reportedly

475
00:26:55.720 --> 00:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>appeared concerned about clothing because the apartment was cold. He

476
00:26:59.240 --> 00:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>asked about his mind, and had officers counted. He requested

477
00:27:02.400 --> 00:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>something to drink. At one point, he reportedly asked for

478
00:27:05.400 --> 00:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>sweet tea, the same drink associated with the store confrontation.

479
00:27:09.160 --> 00:27:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Those details were disturbing, but disturbing behavior is not itself

480
00:27:12.880 --> 00:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>proof of a homicide. Investigators needed to build the case

481
00:27:16.279 --> 00:27:20.279
<v Speaker 1>through evidence, and the evidence was accumulating. Two deaths, one

482
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>suspected the center of both investigations, a convenience store shooting

483
00:27:24.200 --> 00:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>captured on surveillance, a second victim discovered inside an apartment,

484
00:27:28.319 --> 00:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a troubled relationship, a heavily pregnant woman whose final moments

485
00:27:32.119 --> 00:27:35.279
<v Speaker 1>had been recorded, and a series of statements that investigators

486
00:27:35.279 --> 00:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>would have to compare against everything they had already discovered.

487
00:27:38.480 --> 00:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The more evidence they assembled, the more the original shooting

488
00:27:41.519 --> 00:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be only the beginning of the story. The

489
00:27:44.160 --> 00:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>case had started with a gunshot at three in the afternoon.

490
00:27:47.119 --> 00:27:50.079
<v Speaker 1>It had led police to a nearby apartment, and inside

491
00:27:50.079 --> 00:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that apartment they had found a question far more painful

492
00:27:52.920 --> 00:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>than the one they had originally come to answer how

493
00:27:55.440 --> 00:27:58.319
<v Speaker 1>had Denise Middleton's life ended there, and could the evidence

494
00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:00.799
<v Speaker 1>finally tell her side of the story. The evidence could

495
00:28:00.799 --> 00:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>tell investigators where Denise had been found. It could show

496
00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:06.319
<v Speaker 1>who had been with her before her disappearance from public view.

497
00:28:06.599 --> 00:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>It could document the troubled relationship that surrounded her final days.

498
00:28:10.440 --> 00:28:14.039
<v Speaker 1>But evidence also has limits. A surveillance camera cannot explain

499
00:28:14.079 --> 00:28:18.039
<v Speaker 1>what someone was thinking, a forensic finding cannot automatically establish motive,

500
00:28:18.319 --> 00:28:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and a suspect's unusual behavior, no matter how disturbing, cannot

501
00:28:22.279 --> 00:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>replace proof. That was why detectives continued working methodically. They

502
00:28:26.200 --> 00:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>had to reconstruct the timeline without filling its gaps with assumptions.

503
00:28:30.079 --> 00:28:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Moore had provided his own account of the relationship. He

504
00:28:32.799 --> 00:28:37.079
<v Speaker 1>reportedly described arguments and physical encounters, and attempted to explain

505
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>his actions as reactions to circumstances involving Denise. Investigators challenged

506
00:28:42.200 --> 00:28:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that narrative by returning to what they could verify. The

507
00:28:45.160 --> 00:28:49.039
<v Speaker 1>final footage showed Denise appearing frightened, her pregnancy was advanced.

508
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Her remains were found inside Moore's apartment, and Moore had

509
00:28:52.440 --> 00:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>continued living there after her death. Those facts did not

510
00:28:55.359 --> 00:28:58.599
<v Speaker 1>answer every question, but together they created a timeline that

511
00:28:58.640 --> 00:29:02.319
<v Speaker 1>investigators could investigate further. They also had to establish the

512
00:29:02.359 --> 00:29:06.799
<v Speaker 1>circumstances surrounding the discovery itself. When officers entered the apartment

513
00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:10.759
<v Speaker 1>because of the convenience store shooting investigation, they reportedly noticed

514
00:29:10.759 --> 00:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the odor almost immediately following it led them toward the bedroom.

515
00:29:14.680 --> 00:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>There they discovered Denise. The discovery transformed the entire operation.

516
00:29:19.519 --> 00:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Officers were no longer simply searching for evidence related to

517
00:29:22.680 --> 00:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a robbery or shooting. They were now standing inside a

518
00:29:25.759 --> 00:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>potential second homicide scene. The condition of the remains reportedly

519
00:29:29.440 --> 00:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>made immediate identification difficult. Investigators initially wondered whether the person

520
00:29:34.279 --> 00:29:37.599
<v Speaker 1>could be Moore's mother. That uncertainty did not last forever.

521
00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>The victim was Denise. For anyone who had known her,

522
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the identification would have turned an already frightening investigation into

523
00:29:44.880 --> 00:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>something deeply personal. She was twenty six, she was pregnant, and,

524
00:29:49.039 --> 00:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>according to the supplied information, she had been hoping to

525
00:29:51.720 --> 00:29:55.039
<v Speaker 1>build a stable life for herself and her child. Instead,

526
00:29:55.359 --> 00:29:58.559
<v Speaker 1>her final chapter was being reconstructed by investigators who had

527
00:29:58.599 --> 00:30:01.039
<v Speaker 1>never known her while she was al That is one

528
00:30:01.039 --> 00:30:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of the cruel realities of homicide. Investigations after a person dies,

529
00:30:05.480 --> 00:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>strangers begin learning the smallest details of their life because

530
00:30:08.880 --> 00:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those details may help explain how the person disappeared. Investigators

531
00:30:12.920 --> 00:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>look at relationships. They examine movements. They review phone records

532
00:30:16.920 --> 00:30:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and surveillance when available. They examine physical evidence. They interview

533
00:30:21.039 --> 00:30:23.279
<v Speaker 1>people who may have seen the victim, and they listened

534
00:30:23.319 --> 00:30:26.319
<v Speaker 1>carefully to anyone who was with the victim shortly before death.

535
00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>In this case, More was one of those people. He

536
00:30:29.000 --> 00:30:33.759
<v Speaker 1>reportedly spoke extensively with investigators. At times, his statements appeared

537
00:30:33.759 --> 00:30:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to minimize his responsibility or explain his behavior through conflict

538
00:30:37.599 --> 00:30:40.519
<v Speaker 1>with others, but detectives were not simply trying to obtain

539
00:30:40.559 --> 00:30:43.319
<v Speaker 1>an admission. They were trying to determine whether his version

540
00:30:43.400 --> 00:30:47.079
<v Speaker 1>could survive comparison with the evidence. That process also applied

541
00:30:47.119 --> 00:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to the convenience store shooting. More reportedly claimed the confrontation

542
00:30:50.559 --> 00:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>had escalated after the cashier struck him with a bar,

543
00:30:53.400 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but investigators had surveillance footage showing the encounter, and they

544
00:30:56.880 --> 00:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>believed the footage contradicted the idea that the shooting was

545
00:30:59.720 --> 00:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>simple an act of self defense. The forensic evidence could

546
00:31:03.000 --> 00:31:06.599
<v Speaker 1>then provide another layer. Shell casings could help connect ammunition

547
00:31:06.839 --> 00:31:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and weapons to the scene. DNA could potentially establish contact

548
00:31:10.519 --> 00:31:15.039
<v Speaker 1>with objects or locations. Surveillance could establish movements. Each piece

549
00:31:15.039 --> 00:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>had a limited meaning. Together, however, they could form a

550
00:31:18.559 --> 00:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>much stronger picture, and the picture investigators were assembling was

551
00:31:22.279 --> 00:31:26.599
<v Speaker 1>becoming increasingly difficult for more to explain away. Still, Denise's

552
00:31:26.680 --> 00:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>death remained the most important unanswered part. The store shooting

553
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:33.759
<v Speaker 1>had a visible confrontation. Denise's final moments did not. There

554
00:31:33.799 --> 00:31:36.559
<v Speaker 1>was a beginning, there was an ending, but somewhere between

555
00:31:36.599 --> 00:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>them was the truth. Investigators were still trying to recover.

556
00:31:39.839 --> 00:31:42.519
<v Speaker 1>The gap between those two moments was where the investigation

557
00:31:42.720 --> 00:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>became most difficult. Investigators could establish that Denise had been

558
00:31:46.519 --> 00:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>with more shortly before her death. They could establish where

559
00:31:49.400 --> 00:31:52.079
<v Speaker 1>her remains were found. They could document the condition of

560
00:31:52.119 --> 00:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the apartment and the evidence collected there. But establishing a

561
00:31:55.480 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 1>complete timeline required more than simply connecting two locations. It

562
00:31:59.599 --> 00:32:02.799
<v Speaker 1>require are determining when Denise died and what happened during

563
00:32:02.839 --> 00:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the period when no camera was recording her. That was

564
00:32:05.480 --> 00:32:09.319
<v Speaker 1>why the forensic examination was so important. Investigators needed the

565
00:32:09.359 --> 00:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>medical evidence to help establish the circumstances surrounding Denise's death.

566
00:32:13.759 --> 00:32:17.359
<v Speaker 1>The physical evidence could potentially answer questions that statements could not.

567
00:32:17.799 --> 00:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It could help determine whether Moore's account was consistent with

568
00:32:20.519 --> 00:32:24.079
<v Speaker 1>what investigators found, and Moore's account remained a central issue.

569
00:32:24.160 --> 00:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>He reportedly insisted that Denise had still been alive when

570
00:32:27.200 --> 00:32:30.039
<v Speaker 1>he left her. If that statement was accurate, as provided,

571
00:32:30.279 --> 00:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it created a direct question for investigators. If Denise was

572
00:32:33.759 --> 00:32:36.759
<v Speaker 1>alive at that point, what happened afterward. The answer could

573
00:32:36.759 --> 00:32:39.519
<v Speaker 1>not come from Moore's statement alone. It had to be tested.

574
00:32:39.880 --> 00:32:43.519
<v Speaker 1>This is where homicide investigations often become less dramatic than

575
00:32:43.519 --> 00:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the public imagines. There are no instant revelations. There are interviews,

576
00:32:47.839 --> 00:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>laboratory examinations, surveillance reviews, records, photographs, timelines, and repeated attempts

577
00:32:53.960 --> 00:32:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to reconcile information that does not initially fit together. For

578
00:32:57.440 --> 00:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Denise's case, every minute mattered. Beast known footage placed her

579
00:33:01.160 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with more The later discovery placed her inside his apartment.

580
00:33:04.839 --> 00:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>The space between those two facts represented the final period

581
00:33:07.920 --> 00:33:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of her life. Meanwhile, investigators were also dealing with the

582
00:33:11.359 --> 00:33:15.119
<v Speaker 1>consequences of the convenience store shooting. Eilu's death had devastated

583
00:33:15.119 --> 00:33:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the people who worked at the store, According to the

584
00:33:17.319 --> 00:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>supplied information, employees had previously warned authorities about Moore's behavior.

585
00:33:22.039 --> 00:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>They had reportedly experienced disturbances before the fatal confrontation. Now

586
00:33:26.440 --> 00:33:29.599
<v Speaker 1>one of their coworkers was dead. That history raised difficult

587
00:33:29.640 --> 00:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>questions about whether earlier intervention might have changed what happened

588
00:33:32.920 --> 00:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on December eighth, but investigators could only examine the evidence

589
00:33:36.480 --> 00:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>available to them. They could not rewrite earlier decisions or

590
00:33:39.759 --> 00:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know what might have happened under different circumstances. Their immediate

591
00:33:43.039 --> 00:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>responsibility was to establish the facts of the crimes that

592
00:33:46.039 --> 00:33:49.799
<v Speaker 1>had already occurred. The investigation into More therefore continued on

593
00:33:49.880 --> 00:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>two tracks, one concerned Ailu, the other concerned Denise. The

594
00:33:53.960 --> 00:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>evidence surrounding the store's shooting reportedly included surveillance footage, eyewitness information,

595
00:33:59.200 --> 00:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>shell casings, and deanarelated findings. The evidence surrounding Denise included

596
00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, the circumstances of her discovery, the relationship between

597
00:34:08.119 --> 00:34:11.679
<v Speaker 1>her and More, the final footage, and the forensic examination

598
00:34:11.760 --> 00:34:15.159
<v Speaker 1>of her remains. Each investigation had its own questions, but

599
00:34:15.239 --> 00:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they shared one central figure. More had gone from being

600
00:34:17.840 --> 00:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a suspect and a shooting to being connected to his

601
00:34:20.039 --> 00:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>second death discovered inside his home. For investigators, that meant

602
00:34:24.159 --> 00:34:27.639
<v Speaker 1>every statement he made had greater significance. When he explained

603
00:34:27.679 --> 00:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the story incident, detectives could compare his words with video.

604
00:34:31.039 --> 00:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>When he described his relationship with Denise, they could compare

605
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>his account with the known history of their movements and conflicts.

606
00:34:37.119 --> 00:34:39.519
<v Speaker 1>When he described the final time he saw her alive,

607
00:34:39.920 --> 00:34:43.159
<v Speaker 1>investigators could compare that statement with the physical evidence and

608
00:34:43.239 --> 00:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the medical findings, and slowly the space for explanations began

609
00:34:47.039 --> 00:34:50.039
<v Speaker 1>to narrow. Yet there was one thing no investigator could

610
00:34:50.039 --> 00:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>recover through evidence alone, Denise's own voice. She could not

611
00:34:53.760 --> 00:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>tell detectives what she experienced during those final hours. She

612
00:34:56.920 --> 00:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>could not explain why she had entered the apartment. She

613
00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>could not cat firm or challenge Moore's version of their relationship.

614
00:35:02.679 --> 00:35:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So the investigation had to speak for her. Every recording,

615
00:35:05.920 --> 00:35:11.119
<v Speaker 1>every forensic result, every documented movement, every statement, every inconsistency,

616
00:35:11.480 --> 00:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they all became pieces of a story that Denise could

617
00:35:14.079 --> 00:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer tell herself. And as investigators continued assembling those pieces,

618
00:35:18.679 --> 00:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the case moved closer to the question that would ultimately

619
00:35:21.400 --> 00:35:24.639
<v Speaker 1>determine Moore's legal future, not simply whether he had been

620
00:35:24.719 --> 00:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>present when Denise died, but whether the evidence could prove

621
00:35:27.800 --> 00:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>beyond the required legal standard what he had done to her.

622
00:35:30.760 --> 00:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That distinction would become critical as investigators prepared to move

623
00:35:34.360 --> 00:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from suspicion toward charges. A homicide investigation can produce a

624
00:35:38.400 --> 00:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>disturbing collection of circumstances, but prosecutors eventually have to explain

625
00:35:42.920 --> 00:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>how those circumstances connect. They must show what the evidence establishes,

626
00:35:47.039 --> 00:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what witnesses can support, and what remains uncertain. In Moore's case,

627
00:35:51.119 --> 00:35:54.119
<v Speaker 1>investigators had already established enough to place him at the

628
00:35:54.159 --> 00:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>center of the investigation. The convenience store shooting had led

629
00:35:57.400 --> 00:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>directly to him, the apartment had led directly today, but

630
00:36:00.880 --> 00:36:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the two deaths still required separate examinations. For AILU, investigators

631
00:36:05.519 --> 00:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>had a location, surveillance, footage, witnesses, and forensic evidence. The

632
00:36:09.760 --> 00:36:13.599
<v Speaker 1>confrontation inside the store could be reconstructed from the available evidence,

633
00:36:13.880 --> 00:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>giving investigators a clearer understanding of the events immediately before

634
00:36:17.840 --> 00:36:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the shooting. Denise presented a different challenge. Her death had

635
00:36:21.159 --> 00:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>occurred away from public view. There was no witness in

636
00:36:23.960 --> 00:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the supplied information who could describe the moment she died.

637
00:36:27.159 --> 00:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>There was no recording showing what happened inside the apartment. Instead,

638
00:36:31.039 --> 00:36:35.039
<v Speaker 1>investigators had to reconstruct the circumstances through everything that remained.

639
00:36:35.320 --> 00:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>That included more statements. During questioning, he reportedly continued discussing

640
00:36:39.880 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Denise and the arguments they had experienced. He offered his

641
00:36:43.119 --> 00:36:46.599
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of their relationship and described incidents that he believed

642
00:36:46.639 --> 00:36:50.039
<v Speaker 1>explained why tensions had developed between them, But investigators were

643
00:36:50.039 --> 00:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for something more precise. They wanted details that could

644
00:36:53.039 --> 00:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>be independently verified. If Moore said Denise had been somewhere

645
00:36:56.239 --> 00:36:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at a particular time, could that be confirmed. If he

646
00:36:58.880 --> 00:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>described an argument, was there evidence supporting it? If he

647
00:37:01.880 --> 00:37:04.639
<v Speaker 1>claimed that Denise was alive when he last saw did

648
00:37:04.639 --> 00:37:07.599
<v Speaker 1>the forensic evidence agree. These were the kinds of questions

649
00:37:07.599 --> 00:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that could turn a complicated story into an established timeline.

650
00:37:11.039 --> 00:37:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And there was another issue investigators could not ignore. Denise

651
00:37:14.320 --> 00:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>had been close to giving birth. Her pregnancy meant that

652
00:37:16.920 --> 00:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of her death extended beyond the loss of

653
00:37:19.960 --> 00:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>one person. The child she had been preparing to welcome

654
00:37:22.719 --> 00:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>into the world would never experience the future she had imagined.

655
00:37:26.599 --> 00:37:30.679
<v Speaker 1>That fact also made the investigation especially sensitive. Detectives had

656
00:37:30.679 --> 00:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to document Denise as a victim, not merely as evidence

657
00:37:33.760 --> 00:37:36.639
<v Speaker 1>in a case against Moore. Her history mattered, The people

658
00:37:36.639 --> 00:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>who knew her mattered, the circumstances that had left her

659
00:37:39.320 --> 00:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable mattered, And the final footage mattered because it was

660
00:37:42.280 --> 00:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the last surviving records of her life. The

661
00:37:45.039 --> 00:37:48.039
<v Speaker 1>image of Denise entering the elevator with Moore would become

662
00:37:48.119 --> 00:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a powerful reference point in understanding the timeline. At that moment,

663
00:37:52.119 --> 00:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>she was alive, she was pregnant, and she appeared frightened.

664
00:37:55.639 --> 00:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>After that, the trail led to the apartment, then it stopped.

665
00:37:59.079 --> 00:38:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Investigators could not allow the emotional impact of that footage

666
00:38:02.599 --> 00:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to replace the need for proof. They had to determine

667
00:38:05.400 --> 00:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it demonstrated. It demonstrated that Denise was with Moore,

668
00:38:09.360 --> 00:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It demonstrated that she entered the building. It did not

669
00:38:12.320 --> 00:38:16.039
<v Speaker 1>by itself establish what happened inside. That required the rest

670
00:38:16.079 --> 00:38:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the investigation. The apartment became the physical center of

671
00:38:19.320 --> 00:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that inquiry. Every relevant item had to be examined in context.

672
00:38:23.360 --> 00:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Investigators needed to determine what belonged to Denise, what belonged

673
00:38:26.960 --> 00:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to more, and what could potentially establish when and how

674
00:38:29.760 --> 00:38:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the crime occurred. At the same time, the forensic examination

675
00:38:33.199 --> 00:38:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of the remains could provide information about the circumstances of

676
00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Denise's death. Those findings would be essential because eventually investigators

677
00:38:41.000 --> 00:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would have to tell a court not merely that Denise

678
00:38:43.360 --> 00:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was found in Moore's apartment, but why they believed Moore

679
00:38:45.920 --> 00:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for her death, and that meant the investigation

680
00:38:48.960 --> 00:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>could not end with the discovery. The discovery was only

681
00:38:51.880 --> 00:38:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the moment when investigators realized what they were dealing with.

682
00:38:54.880 --> 00:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they had to prove it. The difference between discovering

683
00:38:57.440 --> 00:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a body and proving a homicide would now shape everything

684
00:39:00.400 --> 00:39:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that followed. Investigators had to determine what the physical evidence

685
00:39:03.800 --> 00:39:07.039
<v Speaker 1>could establish about Denise's death, and how that evidence compared

686
00:39:07.079 --> 00:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with more statements. The apartment had become more than the

687
00:39:10.000 --> 00:39:12.679
<v Speaker 1>place where Denise was found. It was now a record

688
00:39:12.719 --> 00:39:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of the final period of her life, preserved in objects, locations,

689
00:39:16.639 --> 00:39:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and forensic traces. The investigation also had to account for

690
00:39:20.199 --> 00:39:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the time Denise had apparently remained there. According to the

691
00:39:23.039 --> 00:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>supplied information, her remains had been inside the apartment while

692
00:39:26.760 --> 00:39:30.199
<v Speaker 1>more continued living there that ment. Investigators were not simply

693
00:39:30.239 --> 00:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>examining a scene where a death had recently occurred. They

694
00:39:33.280 --> 00:39:36.039
<v Speaker 1>were examining a space in which the victim had reportedly

695
00:39:36.079 --> 00:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>remained for an extended period without being discovered by authorities.

696
00:39:39.800 --> 00:39:42.559
<v Speaker 1>That raised another question, who knew Denise was there and

697
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>who did not. Her history of homelessness made the question

698
00:39:45.599 --> 00:39:49.519
<v Speaker 1>particularly difficult. A person without stable housing can move between

699
00:39:49.519 --> 00:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>places without leaving the kind of predictable trail that investigators

700
00:39:53.039 --> 00:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>might expect. Friends and relatives may not immediately know where

701
00:39:56.280 --> 00:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>she is. Programs assisting people experiencing homelessness may I know

702
00:40:00.280 --> 00:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>where someone was last seen without knowing where they went afterward.

703
00:40:03.639 --> 00:40:07.800
<v Speaker 1>For investigators, that meant Denise's movements had to be reconstructed carefully.

704
00:40:08.119 --> 00:40:11.639
<v Speaker 1>The relationship with Moore became increasingly important. According to the

705
00:40:11.639 --> 00:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>supplied information, Moore had encouraged Denise to leave a program

706
00:40:15.320 --> 00:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that was helping her regain stability. The couple then moved

707
00:40:18.320 --> 00:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>between locations and continued experiencing conflict. At some point their

708
00:40:22.719 --> 00:40:26.039
<v Speaker 1>relationship brought Denise to the apartment, and the next confirmed

709
00:40:26.079 --> 00:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>location connected to her was the crime scene. The final

710
00:40:29.000 --> 00:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>footage therefore became more than a piece of surveillance evidence.

711
00:40:32.280 --> 00:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a time stamp in the reconstruction of Denise's life.

712
00:40:35.400 --> 00:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>She entered the elevator, Moore was beside her. She appeared frightened.

713
00:40:39.239 --> 00:40:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Then the footage ended. Investigators had to determine what happened

714
00:40:42.559 --> 00:40:46.119
<v Speaker 1>after that moment. Meanwhile, the case against more concerning Ailu

715
00:40:46.239 --> 00:40:50.159
<v Speaker 1>continued developing. The convenience store manager had reportedly warned police

716
00:40:50.159 --> 00:40:54.199
<v Speaker 1>about Moore's behavior before the shooting. Employees had allegedly experienced

717
00:40:54.239 --> 00:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>repeated confrontations with him. On December eighth, another confrontation began,

718
00:40:58.840 --> 00:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but this time it ended with the else death. The

719
00:41:01.360 --> 00:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>surveillance footage reportedly captured enough of the encounter for investigators

720
00:41:05.320 --> 00:41:09.079
<v Speaker 1>to challenge Moore's description of the shooting. His explanation reportedly

721
00:41:09.119 --> 00:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on the confrontation and suggested that he had been

722
00:41:11.880 --> 00:41:15.679
<v Speaker 1>reacting to the cashier, but investigators believed the footage showed

723
00:41:15.719 --> 00:41:19.360
<v Speaker 1>something different. That disagreement between Moore's account and the recorded

724
00:41:19.360 --> 00:41:24.079
<v Speaker 1>evidence became important because it demonstrated a broader problem facing investigators.

725
00:41:24.519 --> 00:41:27.679
<v Speaker 1>They could not simply take Moore's explanations at face value.

726
00:41:27.719 --> 00:41:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Every statement had to be tested. The same principle applied

727
00:41:30.679 --> 00:41:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to Denise. If Moore said she was alive when he

728
00:41:33.280 --> 00:41:36.559
<v Speaker 1>last saw her, investigators had to examine whether the physical

729
00:41:36.559 --> 00:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>evidence supported that claim. If he described an argument, they

730
00:41:39.880 --> 00:41:42.559
<v Speaker 1>needed to determine whether there was independent evidence of it.

731
00:41:42.880 --> 00:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>If he suggested that Denise had been responsible for escalating

732
00:41:45.920 --> 00:41:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a confrontation, they needed to establish whether that characterization was

733
00:41:49.679 --> 00:41:53.280
<v Speaker 1>supported by evidence or existed only in his account. This

734
00:41:53.360 --> 00:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>process gradually separated the story More wanted investigators to hear

735
00:41:57.440 --> 00:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>from the story the evidence could support, and distinction mattered

736
00:42:00.760 --> 00:42:04.159
<v Speaker 1>because Denise could not challenge him. Her silence was not consent.

737
00:42:04.559 --> 00:42:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It was the consequence of her death. Every missing detail, therefore,

738
00:42:07.840 --> 00:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>became an investigative problem. Every contradiction became something to examine.

739
00:42:12.440 --> 00:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Every piece of evidence became another opportunity to reconstruct the truth.

740
00:42:16.760 --> 00:42:19.519
<v Speaker 1>The investigation had begun with a witness calling nine to

741
00:42:19.559 --> 00:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one one about a shooting, It had expanded when officers

742
00:42:22.440 --> 00:42:26.039
<v Speaker 1>identified More, and it had changed completely when they discovered Denise.

743
00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Now investigators were faced with two victims, two locations, and

744
00:42:30.320 --> 00:42:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a growing body of evidence connecting both investigations to the

745
00:42:33.639 --> 00:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>same suspect. But the case still had to survive the

746
00:42:36.440 --> 00:42:39.800
<v Speaker 1>next stage. The evidence had to be organized, the timelines

747
00:42:39.840 --> 00:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>had to be established, and the investigators had to determine

748
00:42:42.800 --> 00:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>whether everything they had uncovered could explain not only how

749
00:42:45.960 --> 00:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Denise died, but why the evidence pointed toward Moore as

750
00:42:49.039 --> 00:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the person responsible. By this point, the investigation had moved

751
00:42:52.840 --> 00:42:56.119
<v Speaker 1>beyond the shock of the initial discovery. Detectives were now

752
00:42:56.199 --> 00:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>working toward a case that could withstand scrutiny, and that

753
00:42:59.039 --> 00:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>meant separating what they believe from what they could demonstrate.

754
00:43:02.079 --> 00:43:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The evidence surrounding Ailu's death provided one of the clearest

755
00:43:05.320 --> 00:43:09.159
<v Speaker 1>starting points. The store's surveillance system had recorded the confrontation.

756
00:43:09.559 --> 00:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>A witness had reported seeing More leave the area. Investigators

757
00:43:13.039 --> 00:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>had traced his movements to the apartment complex, where they

758
00:43:15.960 --> 00:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>obtained information identifying him. That sequence gave detectives a relatively

759
00:43:20.320 --> 00:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>strong timeline for the shooting, but Denise's death remained different.

760
00:43:24.239 --> 00:43:27.079
<v Speaker 1>The evidence showed where she was found and established her

761
00:43:27.079 --> 00:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>connection to More. Investigators also had the final known footage

762
00:43:30.800 --> 00:43:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the relationship, Yet the precise circumstances

763
00:43:34.079 --> 00:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>surrounding her death required further forensic analysis. The medical examination

764
00:43:38.440 --> 00:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of Denise's remains therefore became essential. Investigators needed to determine

765
00:43:42.920 --> 00:43:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the cause and manner of death and establish whether the

766
00:43:45.679 --> 00:43:49.199
<v Speaker 1>findings were consistent with the circumstances they were investigating. Those

767
00:43:49.239 --> 00:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>findings could then be compared with more statements and the

768
00:43:52.000 --> 00:43:55.119
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence recovered from the apartment. This is where a

769
00:43:55.119 --> 00:43:59.519
<v Speaker 1>homicide investigation often becomes a painstaking process. A detective may

770
00:43:59.559 --> 00:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>have a theory within hours, a prosecutor needs evidence that

771
00:44:02.760 --> 00:44:05.159
<v Speaker 1>can support that theory. Those are not the same thing.

772
00:44:05.480 --> 00:44:08.639
<v Speaker 1>For Denise, investigators had to build the case piece by piece,

773
00:44:09.119 --> 00:44:12.639
<v Speaker 1>her last known movements, her relationship with more, the condition

774
00:44:12.880 --> 00:44:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and location in which she was discovered, the evidence inside

775
00:44:16.239 --> 00:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, more statements, and whatever forensic findings could establish

776
00:44:20.480 --> 00:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>about her final moments. The pregnancy remained an important part

777
00:44:24.000 --> 00:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the human story, but investigators could not allow the

778
00:44:27.039 --> 00:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>tragedy of that fact to determine their conclusions. They still

779
00:44:30.320 --> 00:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>had to follow the evidence wherever it led. The same

780
00:44:32.880 --> 00:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>discipline applied to Moore's behavior after his arrest. His apparent

781
00:44:36.360 --> 00:44:39.639
<v Speaker 1>concern about his clothing, the cold apartment, his money, and

782
00:44:39.719 --> 00:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>getting something to drink could seem extraordinary in the context

783
00:44:42.800 --> 00:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of what police had discovered, but investigators still had to

784
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:48.639
<v Speaker 1>document behavior rather than treat it as proof of guilt.

785
00:44:49.000 --> 00:44:52.679
<v Speaker 1>A suspect's demeanor can be misleading. Evidence is stronger and

786
00:44:52.760 --> 00:44:56.159
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the evidence continued to accumulate. The store

787
00:44:56.199 --> 00:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>manager's previous complaints became part of the background, the surveillance footge,

788
00:45:00.000 --> 00:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>which became part of the record. The forensic evidence became

789
00:45:03.000 --> 00:45:06.599
<v Speaker 1>another component. The discovery of Denise became the second major

790
00:45:06.639 --> 00:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>investigation surrounding More. As investigators examined all of it together,

791
00:45:11.159 --> 00:45:14.559
<v Speaker 1>a pattern began to emerge, but patterns must still be proven.

792
00:45:14.880 --> 00:45:18.159
<v Speaker 1>The most important unresolved issue remained the period between the

793
00:45:18.199 --> 00:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>elevator footage and the discovery of Denise. What happened after

794
00:45:21.760 --> 00:45:24.559
<v Speaker 1>she entered the apartment, how long was she alive, what

795
00:45:24.679 --> 00:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>caused her death, and what did More do afterward? Those

796
00:45:27.440 --> 00:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>questions were not merely narrative mysteries. They were questions that

797
00:45:30.719 --> 00:45:33.559
<v Speaker 1>could determine the legal outcome of the case. Moore had

798
00:45:33.559 --> 00:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>his own version of events, investigators had. Theirs between them

799
00:45:37.440 --> 00:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was the physical evidence. That evidence had no reason to

800
00:45:40.360 --> 00:45:43.760
<v Speaker 1>protect anyone's reputation. It did not care whether a suspect

801
00:45:43.760 --> 00:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>appeared calm or whether a victim had a complicated personal history.

802
00:45:47.679 --> 00:45:50.199
<v Speaker 1>It could only reveal what the investigators were able to

803
00:45:50.239 --> 00:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>recover and interpret, and that made the forensic examination of

804
00:45:53.800 --> 00:45:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Denise one of the most important stages of the entire investigation,

805
00:45:57.559 --> 00:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>because once investigators understood how she died, they could begin

806
00:46:01.199 --> 00:46:04.639
<v Speaker 1>asking an even more specific question. Did the evidence support

807
00:46:04.679 --> 00:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Moore's explanation or did it tell a completely different story.

808
00:46:07.960 --> 00:46:12.280
<v Speaker 1>The answer would determine how investigators understood the apartment, the relationship,

809
00:46:12.480 --> 00:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and the final hours of Denise Middleton's life, and while

810
00:46:15.519 --> 00:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that investigation continued, the death of Ailu remained the event

811
00:46:18.960 --> 00:46:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that had brought police to Moore in the first place.

812
00:46:21.559 --> 00:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Two victims, one investigation, and an increasingly narrow path between

813
00:46:25.719 --> 00:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>what more claimed happened and what investigators believed the evidence showed.

814
00:46:29.800 --> 00:46:33.119
<v Speaker 1>The forensic findings began to give investigators a clearer picture

815
00:46:33.159 --> 00:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of the timeline, but they also introduced another important question,

816
00:46:36.760 --> 00:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>when exactly had Denise died. According to the available case reporting,

817
00:46:40.639 --> 00:46:44.159
<v Speaker 1>investigators determined that Denise had been dead for approximately two

818
00:46:44.280 --> 00:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>months when her remains were discovered in December twenty twenty two.

819
00:46:47.800 --> 00:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>That placed her death around early October, significantly earlier than

820
00:46:51.440 --> 00:46:55.079
<v Speaker 1>the convenience store shooting that ultimately brought police to Moore's apartment.

821
00:46:55.440 --> 00:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That timing changed the way detectives viewed the case. The

822
00:46:58.440 --> 00:47:00.599
<v Speaker 1>shooting at the convenience store was no not the event

823
00:47:00.719 --> 00:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that caused Denise's death. Instead, it appears to have accidentally

824
00:47:04.480 --> 00:47:07.519
<v Speaker 1>exposed a separate homicide that had already occurred weeks earlier.

825
00:47:07.880 --> 00:47:11.599
<v Speaker 1>For investigators, the timeline now stretched backward. The last known

826
00:47:11.599 --> 00:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>footage of Denise showed her entering the elevator with Moore.

827
00:47:14.800 --> 00:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>She was heavily pregnant and appeared frightened. After that footage,

828
00:47:18.360 --> 00:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there was no known public record of her alive. Approximately

829
00:47:21.440 --> 00:47:25.159
<v Speaker 1>two months later, police discovered her remains inside Moore's apartment.

830
00:47:25.480 --> 00:47:28.519
<v Speaker 1>The gap between those points became central to the investigation.

831
00:47:28.920 --> 00:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>According to reporting on the case, the autopsy indicated that

832
00:47:32.039 --> 00:47:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Denise had suffered multiple gunshot wounds. That finding was significant

833
00:47:36.360 --> 00:47:39.559
<v Speaker 1>because it provided investigators with a medical explanation that could

834
00:47:39.559 --> 00:47:42.519
<v Speaker 1>be compared against Moore's account of what had happened. And

835
00:47:42.559 --> 00:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there was another important connection. Investigators were examining evidence from

836
00:47:46.360 --> 00:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>both crime scenes, Shell casings, and other forensic material recovered

837
00:47:50.480 --> 00:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>during the investigation reportedly became part of the effort to

838
00:47:53.880 --> 00:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>connect more to the killings. DNA evidence was also discussed

839
00:47:57.519 --> 00:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>during his interrogation. The investigation was therefore no longer based

840
00:48:01.480 --> 00:48:04.159
<v Speaker 1>only on the fact that Denise had been found inside

841
00:48:04.159 --> 00:48:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Moore's apartment. There was a growing collection of independent evidence.

842
00:48:07.960 --> 00:48:10.679
<v Speaker 1>There was the surveillance footage, There were the witness accounts,

843
00:48:11.000 --> 00:48:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there were the forensic findings, There was the timeline, and

844
00:48:13.840 --> 00:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there were moore'sone statements. Each piece had to be considered separately,

845
00:48:17.639 --> 00:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>then compared with the others. That process also made Moore's

846
00:48:20.920 --> 00:48:24.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier explanation of his relationship with Denise more significant. If

847
00:48:24.840 --> 00:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he claimed that Denise had been alive when he last

848
00:48:26.960 --> 00:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>saw her, investigators needed to establish whether the medical evidence

849
00:48:30.840 --> 00:48:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and timeline supported that claim. The answer would ultimately depend

850
00:48:34.199 --> 00:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on the complete forensic record and the evidence presented in court.

851
00:48:37.800 --> 00:48:41.039
<v Speaker 1>But one thing had already become clear. The woman investigators

852
00:48:41.039 --> 00:48:44.159
<v Speaker 1>found in that apartment had not simply disappeared. She had

853
00:48:44.199 --> 00:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>been there for weeks, and during that time, Moore had

854
00:48:46.960 --> 00:48:50.320
<v Speaker 1>continued living in the same space. The discovery also meant

855
00:48:50.360 --> 00:48:53.079
<v Speaker 1>that the December eighth shooting had exposed something that might

856
00:48:53.159 --> 00:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have remained hidden. Police had gone to the apartment

857
00:48:56.079 --> 00:48:59.599
<v Speaker 1>looking for the man suspected of killing a store cashier. Instead,

858
00:48:59.760 --> 00:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>they found Denise, a woman who had been approaching motherhood,

859
00:49:03.000 --> 00:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a woman whose final known moments had been captured on surveillance,

860
00:49:06.360 --> 00:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and a second death that transformed a single homicide investigation

861
00:49:10.000 --> 00:49:13.559
<v Speaker 1>into a much larger case. Now investigators had to establish

862
00:49:13.639 --> 00:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not only what happened to Denise, but whether the evidence

863
00:49:16.320 --> 00:49:19.039
<v Speaker 1>could prove that Moore was responsible for her death. That

864
00:49:19.159 --> 00:49:22.599
<v Speaker 1>question would eventually move beyond the interrogation room and into

865
00:49:22.599 --> 00:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the court room. By then, investigators had a much clearer

866
00:49:26.000 --> 00:49:28.559
<v Speaker 1>picture of the timeline, but the case was still moving

867
00:49:28.599 --> 00:49:31.119
<v Speaker 1>toward the stage where every piece of evidence would have

868
00:49:31.199 --> 00:49:35.599
<v Speaker 1>to withstand legal scrutiny. The investigation reportedly established that Denise

869
00:49:35.639 --> 00:49:38.760
<v Speaker 1>had been dead for roughly two months before police discovered

870
00:49:38.760 --> 00:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>her remains. That placed her death around early October, meaning

871
00:49:42.400 --> 00:49:45.599
<v Speaker 1>the shooting at the convenience store in December had unexpectedly

872
00:49:45.639 --> 00:49:49.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed a much older crime. That timeline also brought renewed

873
00:49:49.119 --> 00:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>attention to the final known footage of Denise. She had

874
00:49:52.119 --> 00:49:55.159
<v Speaker 1>entered the elevator with Moore, She was heavily pregnant, she

875
00:49:55.199 --> 00:49:59.280
<v Speaker 1>appeared frightened, and sometime afterward, according to the reported timeline,

876
00:49:59.320 --> 00:50:02.559
<v Speaker 1>she was killed. Investigators now had to examine whether the

877
00:50:02.559 --> 00:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>circumstances surrounding her death matched the account More had given them.

878
00:50:06.519 --> 00:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>The medical findings reportedly indicated that Denise had suffered multiple

879
00:50:10.400 --> 00:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gunshot wounds. That evidence became particularly important because it could

880
00:50:14.440 --> 00:50:17.159
<v Speaker 1>be compared with More's statements about the relationship and the

881
00:50:17.199 --> 00:50:20.199
<v Speaker 1>events leading up to her death. But investigators were not

882
00:50:20.239 --> 00:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>relying on one discovery. The case was becoming a collection

883
00:50:23.519 --> 00:50:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of different evidence streams. There was the surveillance footage, there

884
00:50:26.760 --> 00:50:30.559
<v Speaker 1>were witness statements, there were the remains discovered inside the apartment,

885
00:50:30.880 --> 00:50:34.280
<v Speaker 1>There was forensic evidence from the investigation, there were statements

886
00:50:34.280 --> 00:50:37.559
<v Speaker 1>More made during questioning, and there was the timeline connecting everything.

887
00:50:37.840 --> 00:50:40.519
<v Speaker 1>The convenience store shooting remained the event that had brought

888
00:50:40.599 --> 00:50:43.880
<v Speaker 1>police to Moore's apartment in the first place. What began

889
00:50:43.960 --> 00:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>as an investigation into Ailu's death had unexpectedly revealed Denise's death,

890
00:50:48.639 --> 00:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>turning the case into something far larger. According to reporting

891
00:50:52.000 --> 00:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on the case, investigators also examined Moore's Internet search history.

892
00:50:56.320 --> 00:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Reports said searches included questions related to decomposition, disposal of

893
00:51:00.840 --> 00:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a body, and pleading insanity. If accurately reported, those searches

894
00:51:04.960 --> 00:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been potentially significant because they could provide investigators

895
00:51:08.480 --> 00:51:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with evidence of what More was thinking or planning after

896
00:51:11.360 --> 00:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Denise's death. But even evidence that appears powerful must be

897
00:51:14.960 --> 00:51:18.559
<v Speaker 1>interpreted carefully. A search history can show that something was searched,

898
00:51:18.880 --> 00:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it does not automatically establish why it was searched. That

899
00:51:21.840 --> 00:51:24.639
<v Speaker 1>is why investigators would have needed to present those searches

900
00:51:24.679 --> 00:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>alongside the rest of the evidence, rather than treating them

901
00:51:27.480 --> 00:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>as a complete explanation by themselves. The same principle applied

902
00:51:31.280 --> 00:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to the forensic evidence reportedly connecting more to the crimes.

903
00:51:34.840 --> 00:51:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Each piece had to fit into the larger timeline, and

904
00:51:37.639 --> 00:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>increasingly investigators believe the pieces were fitting together. For Denise's family, however,

905
00:51:43.559 --> 00:51:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the most important issue was not the complexity of the investigation.

906
00:51:47.159 --> 00:51:49.559
<v Speaker 1>It was that Denise was gone. She had been approaching

907
00:51:49.559 --> 00:51:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the birth of her son. She had reportedly hoped to

908
00:51:52.000 --> 00:51:55.800
<v Speaker 1>create a family and find stability. Instead, her final known

909
00:51:55.840 --> 00:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>image became a piece of evidence in a homicide investigation.

910
00:51:59.199 --> 00:52:01.800
<v Speaker 1>The apartment where she had died became a crime scene,

911
00:52:01.920 --> 00:52:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and the man beside her in the last known footage

912
00:52:04.280 --> 00:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>became the central figure in the investigation. The case was

913
00:52:07.480 --> 00:52:11.039
<v Speaker 1>now moving toward its next stage. Investigators had gathered evidence,

914
00:52:11.400 --> 00:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they had developed their theory of what happened, and prosecutors

915
00:52:14.400 --> 00:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>would eventually have to take that evidence and presented in

916
00:52:17.039 --> 00:52:19.559
<v Speaker 1>a form that could be tested in court. The story

917
00:52:19.559 --> 00:52:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that began with a bottle of iced tea was about

918
00:52:21.840 --> 00:52:25.039
<v Speaker 1>to become a court room battle over two lives, a pregnancy,

919
00:52:25.320 --> 00:52:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and the evidence investigators believe connected them to one man.

920
00:52:28.960 --> 00:52:31.599
<v Speaker 1>The courtroom would eventually become the place where the competing

921
00:52:31.719 --> 00:52:34.199
<v Speaker 1>versions of events had to be tested, But before that

922
00:52:34.239 --> 00:52:37.559
<v Speaker 1>could happen, investigators still had to finish assembling the case.

923
00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The evidence surrounding Denise's death had to be organized into

924
00:52:41.280 --> 00:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a timeline that could explain the period between her final

925
00:52:43.960 --> 00:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>appearance on surveillance footage and the discovery of her remains

926
00:52:47.039 --> 00:52:50.840
<v Speaker 1>approximately two months later. The reported medical findings were important

927
00:52:50.920 --> 00:52:54.679
<v Speaker 1>because they indicated that Denise had suffered multiple gunshot wounds.

928
00:52:55.119 --> 00:52:58.599
<v Speaker 1>That information gave investigators a clearer understanding of the manner

929
00:52:58.599 --> 00:53:01.119
<v Speaker 1>of her death and allowed them to compare the physical

930
00:53:01.159 --> 00:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence with more statements. There was also the question of

931
00:53:03.960 --> 00:53:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the firearm. The shooting at the convenience store had already

932
00:53:06.840 --> 00:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>established that Moore had allegedly used a gun during the

933
00:53:09.440 --> 00:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>December incident. Investigators now had to examine whether evidence from

934
00:53:13.400 --> 00:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the two scenes could establish a connection between the weapon, ammunition,

935
00:53:17.199 --> 00:53:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and the deaths. The supplied information indicates that investigators examined

936
00:53:21.239 --> 00:53:25.119
<v Speaker 1>shell casings and other forensic evidence, and discussed DNA findings

937
00:53:25.159 --> 00:53:28.679
<v Speaker 1>during Moore's interrogation. If those findings were ultimately admitted and

938
00:53:28.840 --> 00:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>established in court, they could become important links in the

939
00:53:31.760 --> 00:53:35.880
<v Speaker 1>prosecution's case. But investigators also had to examine Moore's behavior

940
00:53:35.920 --> 00:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>after Denise's death. According to reporting about the case, investigators

941
00:53:39.920 --> 00:53:44.639
<v Speaker 1>found Internet searches allegedly involving subjects such as decomposition, disposal

942
00:53:44.679 --> 00:53:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of a body, and pleading insanity. Those searches were potentially

943
00:53:48.159 --> 00:53:51.199
<v Speaker 1>significant because of their timing and their relationship to the

944
00:53:51.199 --> 00:53:55.159
<v Speaker 1>broader investigation. Yet again, context mattered. A search does not

945
00:53:55.239 --> 00:53:59.320
<v Speaker 1>automatically prove a person's intention. Investigators would need to establish

946
00:53:59.360 --> 00:54:02.639
<v Speaker 1>when the searches occurred, what devices or accounts were involved,

947
00:54:02.800 --> 00:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and how they related to the other evidence. That careful

948
00:54:05.480 --> 00:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>approach was especially important because the case contained emotionally powerful circumstances.

949
00:54:10.519 --> 00:54:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Denise was pregnant, her remains had reportedly remained inside the

950
00:54:14.199 --> 00:54:17.559
<v Speaker 1>apartment for weeks, Moore had continued living there, and police

951
00:54:17.559 --> 00:54:20.679
<v Speaker 1>had only discovered her because they were investigating another shooting.

952
00:54:21.000 --> 00:54:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Those facts could create an overwhelming emotional reaction, but a

953
00:54:24.719 --> 00:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>criminal case still had to be built on admissible evidence.

954
00:54:28.119 --> 00:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>The same was true of more statements. He reportedly attempted

955
00:54:31.440 --> 00:54:34.519
<v Speaker 1>to explain the relationship and the confrontations that had occurred

956
00:54:34.519 --> 00:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>between him and Denise. Investigators listened, but they also challenged

957
00:54:38.719 --> 00:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>his version of events. At one point, investigators reportedly tried

958
00:54:42.920 --> 00:54:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to encourage more to view the situation as an argument

959
00:54:45.880 --> 00:54:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that had simply gone too far. They appeared to appeal

960
00:54:48.599 --> 00:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to his emotions and suggest that he might have acted impulsively.

961
00:54:52.239 --> 00:54:56.599
<v Speaker 1>That approach was investigative strategy. Detectives sometimes allow a suspect

962
00:54:56.599 --> 00:54:59.199
<v Speaker 1>to believe that an explanation may be accepted if it

963
00:54:59.280 --> 00:55:02.559
<v Speaker 1>encourages the per person to provide more information. The important

964
00:55:02.559 --> 00:55:05.519
<v Speaker 1>issue is what the suspect actually says and whether those

965
00:55:05.519 --> 00:55:09.199
<v Speaker 1>statements can be verified. Moore's account therefore became another piece

966
00:55:09.239 --> 00:55:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of evidence for investigators to examine, and the more they

967
00:55:12.239 --> 00:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>compared his statements with the physical evidence, the more important

968
00:55:15.519 --> 00:55:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the contradictions became. The case was no longer about one moment.

969
00:55:19.199 --> 00:55:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It was about a chain of events extending from the

970
00:55:21.320 --> 00:55:24.679
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Moore and Denise through the final footage to

971
00:55:24.760 --> 00:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, and then forward to the December shooting that

972
00:55:27.480 --> 00:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>exposed everything. Two deaths had become connected through one investigation.

973
00:55:31.719 --> 00:55:34.199
<v Speaker 1>One victim had been killed in a public business, the

974
00:55:34.239 --> 00:55:37.599
<v Speaker 1>other had been discovered inside a private residence. One death

975
00:55:37.679 --> 00:55:42.119
<v Speaker 1>had witnesses and surveillance, the other depended heavily on forensic reconstruction.

976
00:55:42.480 --> 00:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But both investigations now pointed toward the same central question,

977
00:55:46.199 --> 00:55:49.559
<v Speaker 1>what could prosecutors actually prove about Tory More and as

978
00:55:49.599 --> 00:55:53.159
<v Speaker 1>investigators prepared to turn their evidence over to the legal system,

979
00:55:53.239 --> 00:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between allegation and proof would become more important

980
00:55:56.960 --> 00:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>than ever. The legal process would now have to answer

981
00:55:59.719 --> 00:56:02.559
<v Speaker 1>a ques question the investigation had been circling from the beginning.

982
00:56:02.840 --> 00:56:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Could the evidence establish responsibility for both deaths rather than

983
00:56:06.559 --> 00:56:09.519
<v Speaker 1>simply place more near the scenes. According to reporting on

984
00:56:09.559 --> 00:56:13.039
<v Speaker 1>the case, prosecutors ultimately alleged that Moore was responsible for

985
00:56:13.079 --> 00:56:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the deaths of both Ailu Wandu and Denise Middleton, as

986
00:56:16.199 --> 00:56:19.559
<v Speaker 1>well as the death of Denise's unborn child. Those allegations

987
00:56:19.559 --> 00:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would have to be tested through the court process, rather

988
00:56:22.039 --> 00:56:26.280
<v Speaker 1>than accepted simply because investigators believe them. The evidence surrounding

989
00:56:26.320 --> 00:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the convenience store killing remained a major part of that case.

990
00:56:29.960 --> 00:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance footage reportedly captured the confrontation that preceded Ailu's death,

991
00:56:34.639 --> 00:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>while investigators examined forensic evidence connecting More to the scene.

992
00:56:38.599 --> 00:56:41.719
<v Speaker 1>The history of earlier confrontations at the store also provided

993
00:56:41.719 --> 00:56:45.639
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors with background about the relationship between More and the employees,

994
00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:50.039
<v Speaker 1>but Denise's case carried a different evidentiary burden. The prosecution

995
00:56:50.199 --> 00:56:52.559
<v Speaker 1>had to explain how a pregnant woman who was last

996
00:56:52.559 --> 00:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>seen alive with More ended up dead inside his apartment

997
00:56:55.400 --> 00:56:59.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks later. According to the reported case summary, investigators believed

998
00:56:59.280 --> 00:57:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Denise had suffered multiple gunshot wounds. They also reportedly found

999
00:57:03.840 --> 00:57:07.599
<v Speaker 1>evidence connecting More to the crime scenes, including DNA evidence

1000
00:57:07.639 --> 00:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>associated with shell casings. Then there was Moore's own behavior

1001
00:57:11.000 --> 00:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>after the discovery. He had continued living in the apartment

1002
00:57:13.960 --> 00:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where Denise's remains were found. During his interaction with police,

1003
00:57:17.880 --> 00:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he reportedly appeared focused on ordinary concerns such as clothing, money,

1004
00:57:22.119 --> 00:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and getting something to drink. None of those behaviors could

1005
00:57:24.800 --> 00:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>independently prove a homicide, but when investigators placed them alongside

1006
00:57:28.880 --> 00:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the physical evidence the surveillance footage, the timeline and more statements.

1007
00:57:33.159 --> 00:57:36.599
<v Speaker 1>They became part of the overall picture prosecutors would eventually present.

1008
00:57:37.000 --> 00:57:40.679
<v Speaker 1>There was also reportedly evidence from Moore's phone. Investigators found

1009
00:57:40.719 --> 00:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>searches concerning subjects such as decomposition, disposal of a body,

1010
00:57:45.039 --> 00:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and pleading insanity. Those searches were potentially significant, although their

1011
00:57:49.360 --> 00:57:51.639
<v Speaker 1>meanings still depended on when they were made and the

1012
00:57:51.679 --> 00:57:56.159
<v Speaker 1>circumstances surrounding them. For Denise's family, however, the most important

1013
00:57:56.199 --> 00:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence was not a search history or a shell casing.

1014
00:57:59.119 --> 00:58:01.639
<v Speaker 1>It was the final image of Denise alive. She had

1015
00:58:01.719 --> 00:58:04.159
<v Speaker 1>entered that elevator, she had been approaching the end of

1016
00:58:04.199 --> 00:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>her pregnancy, and she appeared frightened. After that. Her life

1017
00:58:08.000 --> 00:58:11.840
<v Speaker 1>became a collection of evidence recovered by investigators, her remains,

1018
00:58:12.159 --> 00:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, the surveillance footage, the forensic findings, the statements

1019
00:58:16.480 --> 00:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the man who had been with her, peace by peace.

1020
00:58:19.159 --> 00:58:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutors would attempt to turn those fragments into a complete

1021
00:58:22.159 --> 00:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>account of what happened, and eventually the case would reach

1022
00:58:25.400 --> 00:58:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the point where a jury would have to decide which

1023
00:58:27.719 --> 00:58:31.039
<v Speaker 1>version of events was supported by the evidence. The investigation

1024
00:58:31.119 --> 00:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>had begun with a cashier killed during an argument over

1025
00:58:33.840 --> 00:58:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a drink. It had uncovered a woman who had apparently

1026
00:58:36.599 --> 00:58:39.239
<v Speaker 1>been dead for weeks. Now, the justice system had to

1027
00:58:39.239 --> 00:58:41.719
<v Speaker 1>determine whether those two deaths and the death of an

1028
00:58:41.800 --> 00:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>unborn child could be legally attributed to the same man.

1029
00:58:45.320 --> 00:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The answer would come not from the apartment, not from

1030
00:58:47.880 --> 00:58:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the surveillance cameras, and not from Moore's explanations alone, but

1031
00:58:51.440 --> 00:58:54.199
<v Speaker 1>from the evidence presented when the case finally went before

1032
00:58:54.199 --> 00:58:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a jury. Before the case could reach that final judgment,

1033
00:58:57.360 --> 00:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors had to turn the investigation into a coherent legal narrative.

1034
00:59:01.599 --> 00:59:04.039
<v Speaker 1>The story they were preparing to present was not simply

1035
00:59:04.079 --> 00:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about what happened on December eighth. It stretched back to

1036
00:59:06.960 --> 00:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between Moore and Denise and forward to the

1037
00:59:09.920 --> 00:59:14.000
<v Speaker 1>discovery that changed the entire investigation. For the prosecution, the

1038
00:59:14.079 --> 00:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>chronology mattered. Denise had been struggling with homelessness and attempting

1039
00:59:17.840 --> 00:59:21.079
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild her life. She was pregnant and reportedly close

1040
00:59:21.119 --> 00:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to giving birth. Her relationship with Moore had become unstable,

1041
00:59:25.039 --> 00:59:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and the two had moved between different locations. Then came

1042
00:59:28.159 --> 00:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the final known footage. Denise entered the elevator with Moore.

1043
00:59:31.719 --> 00:59:35.159
<v Speaker 1>She appeared frightened that footage established an important point in

1044
00:59:35.199 --> 00:59:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the timeline, but prosecutors still needed to connect it to

1045
00:59:38.280 --> 00:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the evidence discovered later. Approximately two months afterward, according to

1046
00:59:42.360 --> 00:59:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the reported timeline, police entered Moore's apartment while investigating the

1047
00:59:46.119 --> 00:59:50.320
<v Speaker 1>convenience store shooting. They found Denise's remains. That discovery became

1048
00:59:50.360 --> 00:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the central link between the earlier relationship and the later

1049
00:59:53.360 --> 00:59:58.519
<v Speaker 1>homicide investigation. Then came the medical evidence. Investigators reportedly determined

1050
00:59:58.559 --> 01:00:02.599
<v Speaker 1>that Denise had suffered moreultiple gunshot wounds. If established through

1051
01:00:02.639 --> 01:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>admissible forensic testimony, that finding would help prosecutors explain how

1052
01:00:06.760 --> 01:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>she died. The prosecution could then place that evidence beside

1053
01:00:10.159 --> 01:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>more statements and the physical evidence recovered from the apartment,

1054
01:00:13.840 --> 01:00:16.559
<v Speaker 1>but the defense would have an opportunity to challenge every

1055
01:00:16.599 --> 01:00:19.039
<v Speaker 1>part of that narrative. That is how the criminal justice

1056
01:00:19.039 --> 01:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>system is supposed to work. A prosecutor can present a theory,

1057
01:00:22.559 --> 01:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a defense attorney can challenge the evidence, question witnesses, dispute interpretations,

1058
01:00:27.480 --> 01:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and offer an alternative explanation. Where appropriate, The final decision

1059
01:00:31.199 --> 01:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>belongs to the court or jury, depending on the stage

1060
01:00:33.960 --> 01:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and charge. That distinction matters, particularly in a case as

1061
01:00:37.480 --> 01:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>emotionally difficult as this one. Denise's pregnancy, the circumstances of

1062
01:00:41.800 --> 01:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>her death, and the discovery of her remains naturally create

1063
01:00:45.079 --> 01:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a powerful emotional response, but the legal question remains specific,

1064
01:00:49.519 --> 01:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>what did the evidence prove the same standard applied to

1065
01:00:52.199 --> 01:00:56.679
<v Speaker 1>eilose death. Prosecutors could point to the surveillance footage, witness information,

1066
01:00:56.920 --> 01:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and forensic evidence surrounding the convenience store shooting. They could

1067
01:01:00.320 --> 01:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>also describe the history of reported disturbances involving more at

1068
01:01:03.800 --> 01:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the store, but the jury would still have to decide

1069
01:01:06.239 --> 01:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>whether those facts established the charged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt.

1070
01:01:10.199 --> 01:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And there was another unusual feature of the case. The

1071
01:01:12.840 --> 01:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>investigation into Denise had effectively been triggered by the investigation

1072
01:01:16.639 --> 01:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>into Ailu. Police were not searching Moore's apartment because they

1073
01:01:19.840 --> 01:01:22.519
<v Speaker 1>already knew Denise was there. They went there because they

1074
01:01:22.519 --> 01:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>were looking for the suspect in a separate shooting. That

1075
01:01:25.079 --> 01:01:28.079
<v Speaker 1>coincidence became one of the most striking elements of the case.

1076
01:01:28.440 --> 01:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>A homicide investigation had accidentally exposed another homicide. Without the

1077
01:01:32.599 --> 01:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>December shooting, the discovery inside the apartment might have happened

1078
01:01:35.960 --> 01:01:39.519
<v Speaker 1>much later were under completely different circumstances, But on that

1079
01:01:39.559 --> 01:01:44.719
<v Speaker 1>December afternoon, one investigation led directly into another. For Denise's family,

1080
01:01:44.960 --> 01:01:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the discovery could never undo what had happened, but identifying

1081
01:01:48.239 --> 01:01:51.679
<v Speaker 1>what happened was still important. It gave investigators an opportunity

1082
01:01:51.760 --> 01:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to reconstruct her final days, It gave prosecutors an opportunity

1083
01:01:55.559 --> 01:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to seek accountability, and it gave the public a clearer

1084
01:01:58.360 --> 01:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding of how her death came to light. Yet the

1085
01:02:00.960 --> 01:02:04.199
<v Speaker 1>most haunting part of the case remained unchanged. The last

1086
01:02:04.280 --> 01:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>known footage showed Denise alive. She was walking beside more,

1087
01:02:07.800 --> 01:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>she was nearing the end of her pregnancy, and she

1088
01:02:10.159 --> 01:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>appeared afraid. Everything investigators discovered afterward had to be measured

1089
01:02:14.360 --> 01:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>against that final image, because once the elevator doors closed,

1090
01:02:18.119 --> 01:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Denise disappeared from the public record. What remained was the evidence,

1091
01:02:22.039 --> 01:02:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and now that evidence was heading toward a courtroom where

1092
01:02:24.559 --> 01:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the competing stories surrounding two deaths would finally be tested.

1093
01:02:28.199 --> 01:02:31.599
<v Speaker 1>The case was no longer simply an investigation unfolding behind

1094
01:02:31.599 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>closed doors. The evidence was now being transformed into allegations

1095
01:02:35.480 --> 01:02:38.039
<v Speaker 1>that would have to survive the scrutiny of a courtroom.

1096
01:02:38.159 --> 01:02:41.599
<v Speaker 1>According to reporting on the case, prosecutors ultimately alleged that

1097
01:02:41.639 --> 01:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>More was responsible for the deaths of both Ailu Wandu

1098
01:02:44.480 --> 01:02:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and Denise Middleton, as well as the death of Denise's

1099
01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>unborn child. The reported outcome was a conviction on three

1100
01:02:50.760 --> 01:02:54.559
<v Speaker 1>first degree murder counts, followed by three consecutive life sentences

1101
01:02:54.719 --> 01:02:58.159
<v Speaker 1>in an additional eighty years. That outcome gave the investigation

1102
01:02:58.280 --> 01:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a definitive legal conclusion, but it did not make every

1103
01:03:01.400 --> 01:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>detail of the story equally certain. Some facts came from surveillance,

1104
01:03:05.400 --> 01:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>some came from forensic examination, some came from statements More

1105
01:03:08.800 --> 01:03:12.599
<v Speaker 1>made during questioning, and some came from the prosecution's interpretation

1106
01:03:12.719 --> 01:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence. The distinction mattered for Eilu's death. The

1107
01:03:16.519 --> 01:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>reported evidence included surveillance footage of the confrontation, witness information,

1108
01:03:21.039 --> 01:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and forensic evidence. Investigators had been able to trace More

1109
01:03:24.440 --> 01:03:27.039
<v Speaker 1>from the store toward his apartment, where the discovery of

1110
01:03:27.079 --> 01:03:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Denise changed the entire case. For Denise, the prosecution's case

1111
01:03:31.639 --> 01:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>was built around a different collection of evidence. She had

1112
01:03:34.360 --> 01:03:37.239
<v Speaker 1>been Moore's girlfriend. She had been approximately eight and a

1113
01:03:37.239 --> 01:03:39.719
<v Speaker 1>half months pregnant. She was last known to have been

1114
01:03:39.760 --> 01:03:42.719
<v Speaker 1>alive when she entered the elevator with Moore and Roughly

1115
01:03:42.760 --> 01:03:46.159
<v Speaker 1>two months later, her remains were discovered inside his apartment.

1116
01:03:46.519 --> 01:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Investigators reportedly determined that she had suffered multiple gunshot wounds.

1117
01:03:51.119 --> 01:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>They also examined forensic evidence that they believed connected more

1118
01:03:54.440 --> 01:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to the killings. There was another reported piece of evidence

1119
01:03:57.360 --> 01:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that prosecutors could use to challenge Moore's explanation, searches found

1120
01:04:01.360 --> 01:04:04.719
<v Speaker 1>on his phone. According to the case reporting, investigators found

1121
01:04:04.800 --> 01:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>searches concerning body decomposition, disposal of a body, and how

1122
01:04:08.800 --> 01:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to plead insanity. Those searches were not important because a

1123
01:04:11.880 --> 01:04:15.639
<v Speaker 1>search history could magically reveal someone's thoughts. They mattered because

1124
01:04:15.639 --> 01:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of their alleged timing and their relationship to the other

1125
01:04:18.440 --> 01:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence placed alongside the discovery of Denise's remains. Investigators viewed

1126
01:04:23.360 --> 01:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>them as part of a larger pattern. But the most

1127
01:04:25.880 --> 01:04:29.519
<v Speaker 1>important evidence remained the evidence that could independently establish what

1128
01:04:29.599 --> 01:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>happened the apartment. The surveillance footage, the forensic findings, the timeline,

1129
01:04:34.800 --> 01:04:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and more zone statements. Together, prosecutors argued those pieces told

1130
01:04:39.239 --> 01:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>the story that was very different from the explanations more

1131
01:04:42.079 --> 01:04:44.559
<v Speaker 1>had offered during questioning. The case had begun with a

1132
01:04:44.599 --> 01:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>cashier being killed during a confrontation over a drink. It

1133
01:04:47.920 --> 01:04:51.119
<v Speaker 1>had led police to an apartment. Inside that apartment, they

1134
01:04:51.159 --> 01:04:54.079
<v Speaker 1>discovered a pregnant woman who had apparently been dead for weeks,

1135
01:04:54.480 --> 01:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and from there investigators uncovered evidence that prosecutors would eventually

1136
01:04:58.679 --> 01:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>use to argue that the two cas Billings were connected

1137
01:05:00.920 --> 01:05:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to the same defendant. For Denise's family, however, the legal

1138
01:05:04.679 --> 01:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusion could never change the personal loss. The woman in

1139
01:05:07.960 --> 01:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that elevator had been preparing for a child she would

1140
01:05:10.440 --> 01:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>never hold. The future she had reportedly hoped to build

1141
01:05:13.480 --> 01:05:16.119
<v Speaker 1>ended before it began, and the discovery that brought her

1142
01:05:16.159 --> 01:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>death to light happened almost by accident. Police had gone

1143
01:05:19.400 --> 01:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for a suspect in one killing, they found evidence

1144
01:05:22.320 --> 01:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of another. That unexpected connection is what made the case

1145
01:05:25.599 --> 01:05:28.679
<v Speaker 1>so difficult to forget. But even after the verdict, one

1146
01:05:28.719 --> 01:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>image remained at the center of the story, Denise walking

1147
01:05:31.519 --> 01:05:35.519
<v Speaker 1>into that elevator, alive, pregnant, and unaware that the footage

1148
01:05:35.519 --> 01:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>would eventually become part of the record of the final

1149
01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>hours of her life. The verdict gave the investigation its

1150
01:05:41.079 --> 01:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>legal conclusion, but it did not erase the uncertainty surrounding

1151
01:05:45.079 --> 01:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>every minute of Denise's final days. According to the available reporting.

1152
01:05:49.320 --> 01:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Moore was convicted of three counts of first degree murder

1153
01:05:52.440 --> 01:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for Ailu Wandhu, for Denise Middleton, and for Denise's unborn child.

1154
01:05:56.800 --> 01:06:00.519
<v Speaker 1>He was reportedly sentenced to three consecutive life terms, along

1155
01:06:00.559 --> 01:06:04.119
<v Speaker 1>with an additional eighty years for the prosecution. The conviction

1156
01:06:04.280 --> 01:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>represented the culmination of an investigation that had begun almost

1157
01:06:07.840 --> 01:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>by accident. Police had originally responded to a shooting at

1158
01:06:11.039 --> 01:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a convenience store. That investigation led them to more, and

1159
01:06:14.320 --> 01:06:16.679
<v Speaker 1>more led them to an apartment where Denise had already

1160
01:06:16.679 --> 01:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>been dead for approximately two months. The timeline was therefore crucial.

1161
01:06:20.760 --> 01:06:24.119
<v Speaker 1>The December shooting did not cause investigators to discover Denise

1162
01:06:24.199 --> 01:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>immediately after her death. According to the reported timeline, her

1163
01:06:27.920 --> 01:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>death occurred around early October, leaving weeks between her final

1164
01:06:31.480 --> 01:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>known appearance and the moment police found her. During those weeks,

1165
01:06:35.159 --> 01:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>More reportedly continued living in the apartment. That detail remains

1166
01:06:38.960 --> 01:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most disturbing elements of the case, not

1167
01:06:41.559 --> 01:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because it proves anything by itself, but because of what

1168
01:06:44.480 --> 01:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it meant for investigators. When they finally entered the room,

1169
01:06:47.440 --> 01:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they were not looking at the aftermath of a crime

1170
01:06:49.519 --> 01:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that had just happened they were looking at evidence that

1171
01:06:51.920 --> 01:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>had been hidden in plain sight. The investigation also reportedly

1172
01:06:55.480 --> 01:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>uncovered digital evidence that prosecutors could use to argue that

1173
01:06:58.760 --> 01:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Moore had thought about what would have happened after Denise's death.

1174
01:07:01.880 --> 01:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Searches involving decomposition, disposal of a body, and pleading insanity

1175
01:07:06.559 --> 01:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>were reportedly found on his phone. Again, the meaning of

1176
01:07:09.840 --> 01:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>digital searches depends on their context, but prosecutors could place

1177
01:07:13.480 --> 01:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>those searches alongside the physical evidence, the timeline, the surveillance footage,

1178
01:07:17.960 --> 01:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and more statements. Taken together, they argued that the evidence

1179
01:07:21.519 --> 01:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>showed far more than a tragic accident or an act

1180
01:07:24.280 --> 01:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of self defense, and the jury ultimately agreed. For Ailu's family,

1181
01:07:28.760 --> 01:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>justice came after a shooting that had begun with a

1182
01:07:31.039 --> 01:07:35.599
<v Speaker 1>confrontation inside a neighborhood store. For Denise's family, justice came

1183
01:07:35.679 --> 01:07:39.039
<v Speaker 1>after weeks of uncertainty and the devastating discovery of what

1184
01:07:39.079 --> 01:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>had happened to a woman who had been preparing to

1185
01:07:41.400 --> 01:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>become a mother. But a verdict cannot restore the future

1186
01:07:44.360 --> 01:07:47.079
<v Speaker 1>that was lost. Denise would never hold the child she

1187
01:07:47.119 --> 01:07:49.639
<v Speaker 1>had been carrying. Alu would never return to the store

1188
01:07:49.679 --> 01:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>where he had been working and the people who knew

1189
01:07:51.800 --> 01:07:53.639
<v Speaker 1>them would have to live with the knowledge that their

1190
01:07:53.679 --> 01:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>lives had ended in circumstances that began as ordinary moments

1191
01:07:57.519 --> 01:08:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and turned into irreversible tragedy. There was also an uncomfortable

1192
01:08:01.280 --> 01:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>lesson in how the case was discovered. The investigation into

1193
01:08:04.280 --> 01:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Denise's death did not begin with someone finding her missing

1194
01:08:07.440 --> 01:08:11.159
<v Speaker 1>person case and walking investigators directly to more. It began

1195
01:08:11.239 --> 01:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with another violent crime. That crime produced surveillance footage. The

1196
01:08:14.760 --> 01:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>footage produced an identification, The identification produced a search, and

1197
01:08:19.039 --> 01:08:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the search revealed something nobody had initially expected to find.

1198
01:08:22.479 --> 01:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>One investigation opened the door to another, and behind that

1199
01:08:25.800 --> 01:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>door was the final chapter of Denise Middleton's life. Her

1200
01:08:28.920 --> 01:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>last known image remains the beginning of that final chapter,

1201
01:08:32.079 --> 01:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a pregnant young woman entering an elevator beside Moore, unaware

1202
01:08:35.720 --> 01:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that the footage would eventually become part of the evidence

1203
01:08:38.319 --> 01:08:41.239
<v Speaker 1>used to reconstruct what happened after the doors closed. The

1204
01:08:41.279 --> 01:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>image of that elevator is difficult to separate from everything

1205
01:08:44.399 --> 01:08:48.239
<v Speaker 1>investigators would discover later. At the time the camera recorded Denise,

1206
01:08:48.479 --> 01:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>there was no way for anyone watching the footage to

1207
01:08:50.760 --> 01:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know that it would eventually become evidence. In a murder case.

1208
01:08:54.039 --> 01:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>There was no warning written across the screen, no explanation

1209
01:08:57.039 --> 01:08:59.279
<v Speaker 1>of what was about to happen, just a few moments

1210
01:08:59.319 --> 01:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>preserved by a surveillance system. That is often how the

1211
01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:06.399
<v Speaker 1>most important evidence begins. A camera record something ordinary. Weeks

1212
01:09:06.520 --> 01:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or months later, investigators returned to it because the people

1213
01:09:09.680 --> 01:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in the footage are no longer living ordinary lives. For Denise,

1214
01:09:13.680 --> 01:09:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that recording became one of the last known pieces of

1215
01:09:16.119 --> 01:09:20.039
<v Speaker 1>evidence showing her alive. For investigators, it helped establish the

1216
01:09:20.079 --> 01:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>timeline for her family. It represented something even more painful,

1217
01:09:24.359 --> 01:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>one of the final images they could have of her

1218
01:09:26.399 --> 01:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>before her life ended. The case also demonstrated how quickly

1219
01:09:29.640 --> 01:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>an investigation can change direction. Officers responding to the convenience

1220
01:09:33.560 --> 01:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>store shooting were initially focused on Ailu's death and the

1221
01:09:36.880 --> 01:09:41.359
<v Speaker 1>person responsible for it. They followed surveillance footage, gathered witness information,

1222
01:09:41.600 --> 01:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>identified more, and went to his apartment. They did not

1223
01:09:44.600 --> 01:09:47.399
<v Speaker 1>know they were about to uncover another homicide. Then came

1224
01:09:47.399 --> 01:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to smell, then the search, then the remains, and suddenly

1225
01:09:51.199 --> 01:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the investigation expanded backward in time. The December shooting was

1226
01:09:54.960 --> 01:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>no longer the beginning of the story. It was the

1227
01:09:57.239 --> 01:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>event that exposed what had happened months earlier. Acording to

1228
01:10:00.359 --> 01:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the reported case information, Denise had been dead for roughly

1229
01:10:03.479 --> 01:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>two months when officers discovered her. During that period, the

1230
01:10:06.960 --> 01:10:10.279
<v Speaker 1>world outside the apartment continued moving. People went to work,

1231
01:10:10.600 --> 01:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>stores opened, families continued their routines. Life went on. But

1232
01:10:14.640 --> 01:10:18.159
<v Speaker 1>inside that apartment, the truth about Denise's death remained hidden

1233
01:10:18.399 --> 01:10:22.239
<v Speaker 1>until December eighth. The investigation that followed ultimately produced a

1234
01:10:22.319 --> 01:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>legal conclusion. More was convicted of the reported killings of Ailu, Denise,

1235
01:10:26.800 --> 01:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and Denise's unborn child, and received three consecutive life sentences

1236
01:10:31.039 --> 01:10:34.399
<v Speaker 1>along with an additional eighty years. That verdict answered the

1237
01:10:34.439 --> 01:10:38.039
<v Speaker 1>central legal question of responsibility, but it could never answer

1238
01:10:38.159 --> 01:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>every personal question left behind. Why did Denise remain connected

1239
01:10:41.800 --> 01:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to a relationship that had become so unstable. What might

1240
01:10:44.960 --> 01:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have happened if she had been able to remain in

1241
01:10:46.800 --> 01:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the program that was helping her. Could someone have recognized

1242
01:10:49.760 --> 01:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the danger earlier? Could the violence at the convenience store

1243
01:10:52.479 --> 01:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>have been prevented? Those questions belong to a different part

1244
01:10:55.359 --> 01:10:59.039
<v Speaker 1>of the story. They are questions about warning signs, vulnerability,

1245
01:10:59.279 --> 01:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>intervention in the moments when circumstances can still change. By

1246
01:11:02.960 --> 01:11:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the time police entered Moore's apartment, those moments were gone.

1247
01:11:06.199 --> 01:11:09.359
<v Speaker 1>All investigators could do was reconstruct what had already happened.

1248
01:11:09.640 --> 01:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>They gathered the footage, They examined the physical evidence, They

1249
01:11:13.119 --> 01:11:16.479
<v Speaker 1>listened to more statements, They followed the forensic trail, and

1250
01:11:16.520 --> 01:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>they presented what they found through the justice system. The

1251
01:11:19.119 --> 01:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>final outcome could not give Denise the future she had

1252
01:11:21.720 --> 01:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>been preparing for. She had reportedly been only weeks away

1253
01:11:24.920 --> 01:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>from becoming a mother. Her son, Ezekiel, would never experience

1254
01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the life she had imagined for him. Altho would never

1255
01:11:31.279 --> 01:11:34.039
<v Speaker 1>return to the convenience store, and the people left behind

1256
01:11:34.039 --> 01:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would have to carry the consequences of two violent deaths

1257
01:11:36.840 --> 01:11:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that became connected only because one investigation unexpectedly uncovered another.

1258
01:11:41.600 --> 01:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>That is what makes this case so unsettling. It did

1259
01:11:44.199 --> 01:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>not begin with investigators searching for Denise. It began with

1260
01:11:47.439 --> 01:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a shooting. A witness made a call, Police followed a trail,

1261
01:11:50.800 --> 01:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>a door opened, and inside was the answer to a

1262
01:11:53.359 --> 01:11:56.359
<v Speaker 1>mystery nobody had known they were about to uncover. The

1263
01:11:56.439 --> 01:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>case ultimately ended in a court room, but the story

1264
01:11:59.119 --> 01:12:02.239
<v Speaker 1>began much early in the complicated lives of people who

1265
01:12:02.319 --> 01:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>were still hoping for ordinary futures. For Denise, that future

1266
01:12:06.199 --> 01:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>ended behind a door that investigators would eventually open. And

1267
01:12:09.239 --> 01:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for the detectives who entered that apartment, the case they

1268
01:12:11.840 --> 01:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>thought they were solving would never again be just one shooting.

1269
01:12:15.079 --> 01:12:18.039
<v Speaker 1>It had become the discovery of two lives lost, one

1270
01:12:18.159 --> 01:12:21.039
<v Speaker 1>unborn child lost, and a trail of evidence that had

1271
01:12:21.039 --> 01:12:24.159
<v Speaker 1>remained hidden until a completely different crime brought police to

1272
01:12:24.199 --> 01:12:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the door. The legal conclusion did not change the sequence

1273
01:12:27.319 --> 01:12:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that had brought investigators to that apartment. It only gave

1274
01:12:30.279 --> 01:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the sequence a final place in the justice system. For detectives,

1275
01:12:33.800 --> 01:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the case had begun with a call from a witness

1276
01:12:35.800 --> 01:12:38.399
<v Speaker 1>who did not know how important her decision would become.

1277
01:12:38.800 --> 01:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>She had heard gunshots, seen a man leaving the store,

1278
01:12:41.640 --> 01:12:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and called police. Her description gave investigators something to work

1279
01:12:45.279 --> 01:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with when the scene was still unfolding. That decision ultimately

1280
01:12:48.600 --> 01:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>led them to more, and finding more led them somewhere

1281
01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:55.239
<v Speaker 1>nobody expected. The apartment became the point where two investigations collided.

1282
01:12:55.560 --> 01:12:58.479
<v Speaker 1>One concerned Eilieu, a sixty one year old cashier who

1283
01:12:58.520 --> 01:13:01.279
<v Speaker 1>had been working when the conference taation erupted. The other

1284
01:13:01.399 --> 01:13:04.399
<v Speaker 1>concerned Denise, a twenty six year old woman whose death

1285
01:13:04.439 --> 01:13:07.279
<v Speaker 1>had remained hidden for weeks. The connection between them was

1286
01:13:07.319 --> 01:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>not immediately obvious. It emerged peace by piece. The surveillance footage,

1287
01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:16.039
<v Speaker 1>the witness description, the apartment information, the discovery of Denise,

1288
01:13:16.439 --> 01:13:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the forensic examination, the statements made during questioning, and the

1289
01:13:20.199 --> 01:13:24.359
<v Speaker 1>evidence investigators believe connected more to both killings. Each piece

1290
01:13:24.479 --> 01:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>answered one question while creating another. That is what made

1291
01:13:27.479 --> 01:13:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the case so difficult to understand. In the beginning, the

1292
01:13:30.359 --> 01:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>shooting at the store appeared to be an isolated act

1293
01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of violence. Then the apartment revealed that it was not

1294
01:13:35.680 --> 01:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the only tragedy surrounding more. Denise's story also showed how

1295
01:13:39.640 --> 01:13:43.159
<v Speaker 1>complicated the circumstances leading up to a violent crime can become.

1296
01:13:43.479 --> 01:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>According to the supplied information, she had struggled with homelessness

1297
01:13:47.079 --> 01:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and was trying to establish stability while pregnant. Her relationship

1298
01:13:50.800 --> 01:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>with Moore was unstable, and the couple repeatedly moved from

1299
01:13:54.079 --> 01:13:57.279
<v Speaker 1>one place to another. There were arguments, there were reported

1300
01:13:57.319 --> 01:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>physical confrontations. There were attempts to explain what had happened

1301
01:14:00.760 --> 01:14:04.279
<v Speaker 1>from different perspectives, but only one person from that relationship

1302
01:14:04.359 --> 01:14:07.279
<v Speaker 1>was still alive to give an account. That imbalance matters.

1303
01:14:07.600 --> 01:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>When investigators questioned more he could describe events in his

1304
01:14:10.680 --> 01:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>own words. Denise could not. Her side had to be

1305
01:14:13.600 --> 01:14:17.119
<v Speaker 1>reconstructed from evidence. The surveillance footage could show her movements,

1306
01:14:17.479 --> 01:14:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the forensic examination could provide information about her death, the

1307
01:14:21.119 --> 01:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>apartment could reveal what investigators discovered after she was gone,

1308
01:14:24.880 --> 01:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and the legal proceedings could determine what prosecutors were able

1309
01:14:27.880 --> 01:14:31.479
<v Speaker 1>to prove. Eventually, the jury reached its decision. One was

1310
01:14:31.479 --> 01:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>convicted of the reported killings and received the substantial sentence

1311
01:14:34.880 --> 01:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that followed. For the justice system, the case had reached

1312
01:14:37.720 --> 01:14:40.479
<v Speaker 1>its conclusion. For the people who knew Denise and Eilu,

1313
01:14:40.720 --> 01:14:44.319
<v Speaker 1>there was no equivalent ending. A verdict can establish responsibility.

1314
01:14:44.600 --> 01:14:47.239
<v Speaker 1>It cannot restore a life. It cannot return a mother

1315
01:14:47.279 --> 01:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to a child she never had the chance to raise.

1316
01:14:49.840 --> 01:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It cannot give a family another conversation with someone they lost,

1317
01:14:53.279 --> 01:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And it cannot erase the image of the final moments

1318
01:14:55.680 --> 01:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that investigators preserved on surveillance. That image remains powerful, precise

1319
01:15:00.239 --> 01:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>because nothing about it looks like the ending of a life.

1320
01:15:02.880 --> 01:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Denise enters the elevator, the doors close, the recording continues,

1321
01:15:06.960 --> 01:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with no understanding of what it will eventually mean then

1322
01:15:09.880 --> 01:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the footage becomes part of an investigation into her death.

1323
01:15:13.079 --> 01:15:17.079
<v Speaker 1>That is the unsettling reality of surveillance evidence. Cameras often

1324
01:15:17.119 --> 01:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>record people without anyone realizing that their ordinary movements may

1325
01:15:21.039 --> 01:15:24.439
<v Speaker 1>someday become the final record of their lives. For Denise,

1326
01:15:24.640 --> 01:15:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that recording became a bridge between the life she was

1327
01:15:27.399 --> 01:15:31.199
<v Speaker 1>living and the crime investigators would later reconstruct. For Ailu,

1328
01:15:31.520 --> 01:15:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the store surveillance helped preserve the confrontation that preceded his death,

1329
01:15:35.520 --> 01:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and for investigators, both recordings helped turn fragments into a timeline.

1330
01:15:39.920 --> 01:15:43.479
<v Speaker 1>The case ultimately demonstrates how one violent event can expose

1331
01:15:43.520 --> 01:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>another hidden tragedy. A call about gunshots led police to

1332
01:15:46.920 --> 01:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a suspect. The suspect led them to an apartment. The

1333
01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>apartment revealed Denise, and Denise's discovery forced investigators to look backward,

1334
01:15:55.079 --> 01:15:58.159
<v Speaker 1>searching through weeks of missing time for answers. By the

1335
01:15:58.199 --> 01:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>time those answers reached a court room, the most important

1336
01:16:00.960 --> 01:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>people in the story could no longer speak for themselves.

1337
01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:06.319
<v Speaker 1>The evidence had to speak for them, and that evidence

1338
01:16:06.359 --> 01:16:09.039
<v Speaker 1>had to be strong enough to survive a process designed

1339
01:16:09.039 --> 01:16:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to challenge it. The prosecution could present its timeline, but

1340
01:16:12.359 --> 01:16:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the defense could question how each conclusion had been reached.

1341
01:16:15.520 --> 01:16:18.079
<v Speaker 1>A surveillance recording could be examined for what it showed

1342
01:16:18.199 --> 01:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and what it did not show. A forensic result could

1343
01:16:20.840 --> 01:16:24.479
<v Speaker 1>be challenged on methodology or interpretation. A statement could be

1344
01:16:24.520 --> 01:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>examined for context. A digital search could be questioned for

1345
01:16:27.680 --> 01:16:31.039
<v Speaker 1>its meaning. That process mattered because the case contained several

1346
01:16:31.039 --> 01:16:34.319
<v Speaker 1>different layers of evidence. At the center was the physical evidence.

1347
01:16:34.640 --> 01:16:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Denise had been discovered inside Moore's apartment. Her remains had

1348
01:16:38.079 --> 01:16:41.479
<v Speaker 1>reportedly been there for an extended period. The medical examination

1349
01:16:41.600 --> 01:16:45.439
<v Speaker 1>provided information about how she died. Investigators then compared those

1350
01:16:45.479 --> 01:16:49.119
<v Speaker 1>findings with everything they had learned about More and Denise's relationship.

1351
01:16:49.479 --> 01:16:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Around that physical evidence was the digital evidence. Surveillance cameras

1352
01:16:53.279 --> 01:16:57.359
<v Speaker 1>had captured movements connected to the case. Investigators could establish

1353
01:16:57.359 --> 01:17:00.239
<v Speaker 1>where Moore went after the convenience store shooting and where

1354
01:17:00.279 --> 01:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Denise had been shortly before her death. Then there were

1355
01:17:02.760 --> 01:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the statements More had spoken to investigators about the store

1356
01:17:05.880 --> 01:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>confrontation and about Denise. His explanations gave detectives a version

1357
01:17:10.039 --> 01:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of events, but that version had to be tested against

1358
01:17:12.760 --> 01:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>everything else. And finally, there were the people left behind

1359
01:17:16.279 --> 01:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the store employees who had known Ilu, the people who

1360
01:17:18.760 --> 01:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>knew Denise, the investigators who had entered the apartment, the

1361
01:17:22.239 --> 01:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>witness who made the emergency call. Each person saw a

1362
01:17:25.119 --> 01:17:27.319
<v Speaker 1>different part of the story. None saw all of it.

1363
01:17:27.600 --> 01:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>That is why the investigation had to be assembled rather

1364
01:17:30.239 --> 01:17:33.279
<v Speaker 1>than simply told. A witness could describe what happened outside

1365
01:17:33.279 --> 01:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the store, a camera could show what happened inside. A

1366
01:17:36.159 --> 01:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>forensic examination could reveal information about a victim's death. A

1367
01:17:40.039 --> 01:17:43.279
<v Speaker 1>suspect could provide his own explanation. But the complete picture

1368
01:17:43.359 --> 01:17:47.039
<v Speaker 1>only emerged when investigators placed those pieces beside one another.

1369
01:17:47.479 --> 01:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>For Denise, that process was especially important because her final

1370
01:17:50.960 --> 01:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>hours had no surviving eyewitness account in the supplied information.

1371
01:17:54.840 --> 01:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The last known footage therefore became a crucial reference point.

1372
01:17:58.079 --> 01:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>She entered the elevator, more was with her, she appeared frightened,

1373
01:18:01.680 --> 01:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>then the trail disappeared from public view. When investigators eventually

1374
01:18:05.399 --> 01:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>found her, the timeline had already stretched backward for weeks.

1375
01:18:09.079 --> 01:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That gap between the last footage and the discovery was

1376
01:18:11.840 --> 01:18:15.239
<v Speaker 1>where the most important questions remained. The investigation had to

1377
01:18:15.359 --> 01:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>establish what could be proven about those missing moments, and

1378
01:18:18.439 --> 01:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that is also where the difference between an allegation and

1379
01:18:21.039 --> 01:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a proven fact becomes essential. A documentary can describe what

1380
01:18:24.560 --> 01:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>investigators believed. It can explain what prosecutors argued. It can

1381
01:18:28.359 --> 01:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>present what a suspect claimed, but those things should not

1382
01:18:31.159 --> 01:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be blended together as though they are identical. In Denise's case,

1383
01:18:34.800 --> 01:18:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution's theory was ultimately tested through the legal process.

1384
01:18:38.600 --> 01:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The reported conviction established the legal outcome, but understanding how

1385
01:18:42.560 --> 01:18:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that outcome was reached requires looking at the evidence that

1386
01:18:45.119 --> 01:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>came before it. The story was not solved by one

1387
01:18:47.760 --> 01:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>dramatic discovery. It was solved through accumulation, one clue, one recording,

1388
01:18:52.800 --> 01:18:57.279
<v Speaker 1>one forensic finding, one statement, one timeline, one contradiction, and

1389
01:18:57.359 --> 01:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually enough evidence for the justice system to reach its conclusion.

1390
01:19:01.279 --> 01:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Yet even after that conclusion, one fact remains impossible to change.

1391
01:19:05.520 --> 01:19:09.079
<v Speaker 1>The person whose story investigators were trying hardest to reconstruct

1392
01:19:09.239 --> 01:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was no longer alive to tell it. Denise could not

1393
01:19:12.000 --> 01:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>explain the relationship from her own perspective. She could not

1394
01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>describe the final moments inside the apartment. She could not

1395
01:19:17.960 --> 01:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>answer the questions surrounding her death. So investigators had to

1396
01:19:21.199 --> 01:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>recover her story from what she left behind, and sometimes

1397
01:19:24.560 --> 01:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in a homicide investigation, that is the closest thing to

1398
01:19:27.640 --> 01:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a victim speaking from beyond the grave. The evidence did

1399
01:19:30.760 --> 01:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not speak with one voice. It came from different places,

1400
01:19:34.119 --> 01:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>at different times, and under very different circumstances. Investigators had

1401
01:19:38.479 --> 01:19:42.039
<v Speaker 1>to determine which pieces could be independently verified and which

1402
01:19:42.079 --> 01:19:46.319
<v Speaker 1>depended on someone's interpretation. That distinction became particularly important when

1403
01:19:46.359 --> 01:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>examining Moore's explanations. During questioning, he attempted to describe his

1404
01:19:50.800 --> 01:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Denise and the events that had taken place

1405
01:19:53.560 --> 01:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>between them. He presented his own interpretation of their arguments

1406
01:19:56.840 --> 01:20:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and confrontations. But detectives already had evidence that could be

1407
01:20:00.319 --> 01:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>compared against what he was saying. They knew Denise had

1408
01:20:02.920 --> 01:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>been found inside the apartment, They knew she had been

1409
01:20:05.520 --> 01:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>dead for an extended period. They knew she had been

1410
01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>heavily pregnant, they knew she had been seen alive with

1411
01:20:10.640 --> 01:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>more before her death, and they had the forensic evidence

1412
01:20:13.439 --> 01:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>surrounding both homicide investigations. The more investigators examined the timeline,

1413
01:20:18.439 --> 01:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the harder it became to treat the two deaths as

1414
01:20:20.840 --> 01:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>isolated incidents. The December shooting had revealed the apartment the

1415
01:20:24.800 --> 01:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>apartment had revealed Denise, and Denise had revealed a period

1416
01:20:28.199 --> 01:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of time that investigators had to reconstruct. That reconstruction was

1417
01:20:31.800 --> 01:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>also important for understanding the human side of the case.

1418
01:20:34.920 --> 01:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Denise was not simply a name in a police report.

1419
01:20:37.720 --> 01:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>She was twenty six years old. She had been struggling

1420
01:20:40.279 --> 01:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to find stability, She was preparing for the birth of

1421
01:20:42.800 --> 01:20:46.039
<v Speaker 1>her son, and according to the information provided about her life,

1422
01:20:46.239 --> 01:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to build a family and create a better future.

1423
01:20:49.239 --> 01:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The final footage, therefore, carries a significance that goes beyond

1424
01:20:52.600 --> 01:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>its evidentiary value. It shows a person at the edge

1425
01:20:55.680 --> 01:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of a future that would never happen. There is no

1426
01:20:58.119 --> 01:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>narration inside the elevator, no explanation, no warning, only Denise

1427
01:21:02.760 --> 01:21:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and more moving toward the apartment. For investigators, the footage

1428
01:21:06.319 --> 01:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>became a timestamp. For the people who love Denise, it

1429
01:21:09.439 --> 01:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>became something much more painful, one of the last preserved

1430
01:21:12.720 --> 01:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>moments of her life. Meanwhile, the death of Ailu had

1431
01:21:15.600 --> 01:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>its own consequences. He had been working behind the counter

1432
01:21:18.479 --> 01:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>when the confrontation began. The investigation indicated that the dispute

1433
01:21:22.479 --> 01:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>escalated into gunfire, and he died at the scene. His

1434
01:21:25.560 --> 01:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>death was the event that brought police to more. Without

1435
01:21:28.399 --> 01:21:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that call, that surveillance footage, and that investigation, the discovery

1436
01:21:32.239 --> 01:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of Denise might have taken a very different path. That

1437
01:21:35.039 --> 01:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>connection is one of the most striking elements of the case.

1438
01:21:38.199 --> 01:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes a hidden crime is uncovered because investigators deliberately search

1439
01:21:42.239 --> 01:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for it. Other times it is exposed by an entirely

1440
01:21:45.239 --> 01:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>separate event. Here, according to the reported timeline, the second

1441
01:21:49.039 --> 01:21:52.079
<v Speaker 1>scenario occurred, a shooting in a convenience store opened a

1442
01:21:52.119 --> 01:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>door into a much older tragedy, and once investigators crossed

1443
01:21:55.720 --> 01:21:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that threshold, there was no way to separate the two investigations.

1444
01:21:59.600 --> 01:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The case eventually produced a conviction and a lengthy sentence,

1445
01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>giving the criminal justice system a definitive outcome. But legal

1446
01:22:06.359 --> 01:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>closure is not the same as emotional closure. A sentence

1447
01:22:09.720 --> 01:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>can punish a defendant, it cannot restore the people who

1448
01:22:12.399 --> 01:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>were lost. It cannot give Denise the opportunity to raise

1449
01:22:15.680 --> 01:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>her child, It cannot return Ilud to his family, and

1450
01:22:18.680 --> 01:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it cannot erase the questions that naturally remain around lives

1451
01:22:21.960 --> 01:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that ended so suddenly. What remains is the record, the

1452
01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>emergency call, the surveillance footage, the apartment, the forensic findings,

1453
01:22:29.800 --> 01:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the interviews, the court room evidence, and the final image

1454
01:22:33.039 --> 01:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of Denise entering an elevator while carrying a future she

1455
01:22:36.239 --> 01:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>would never live to see. That image became the quiet

1456
01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the end of her story, but for investigators,

1457
01:22:42.039 --> 01:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it was also the beginning of understanding what had happened.

1458
01:22:44.640 --> 01:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>After the elevator doors closed, and when those doors finally

1459
01:22:47.800 --> 01:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>opened again, the life Denise had been building was gone,

1460
01:22:51.039 --> 01:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving behind only the evidence from which investigators would reconstruct

1461
01:22:54.840 --> 01:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>her final chapter. The reconstruction of that final chapter was

1462
01:22:58.239 --> 01:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>never going to restore what had been lost, but it

1463
01:23:00.479 --> 01:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>could establish a record of what investigators believed had happened

1464
01:23:03.840 --> 01:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and why the case ultimately resulted in a conviction. By then,

1465
01:23:07.359 --> 01:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the evidence had traveled a long distance from the apartment

1466
01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>where Denise was found. It had moved through forensic examination, interviews,

1467
01:23:14.560 --> 01:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>digital evidence, surveillance footage, and eventually the court room. Each

1468
01:23:18.199 --> 01:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stage served a different purpose. The surveillance footage established movements.

1469
01:23:22.279 --> 01:23:25.239
<v Speaker 1>The forensic evidence helped establish what happened to the victims.

1470
01:23:25.600 --> 01:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>The interviews revealed competing accounts, the digital evidence provided investigators

1471
01:23:30.199 --> 01:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>with additional material to examine, and the court determined whether

1472
01:23:33.479 --> 01:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution had proved its case for more. The investigation

1473
01:23:37.279 --> 01:23:41.079
<v Speaker 1>had started with the December shooting. For investigators, however, the

1474
01:23:41.119 --> 01:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>apartment had transformed that case into something much larger. They

1475
01:23:44.680 --> 01:23:48.039
<v Speaker 1>had entered expecting to find a suspect. Instead, they found

1476
01:23:48.079 --> 01:23:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the remains of a woman who had apparently been dead

1477
01:23:50.319 --> 01:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for weeks. That discovery meant that the December shooting could

1478
01:23:53.600 --> 01:23:56.079
<v Speaker 1>no longer be understood on its own. There was now

1479
01:23:56.119 --> 01:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a second victim, and there was a relationship that investigators

1480
01:23:59.119 --> 01:24:02.319
<v Speaker 1>had to understand. Denise and Moore had reportedly been together

1481
01:24:02.399 --> 01:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>on and off. Their circumstances were unstable, and the relationship

1482
01:24:06.199 --> 01:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>had included arguments and conflict. Denise was also approaching the

1483
01:24:10.079 --> 01:24:13.319
<v Speaker 1>end of her pregnancy. That fact made the investigation even

1484
01:24:13.399 --> 01:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for those involved. Because the death was not

1485
01:24:16.319 --> 01:24:20.279
<v Speaker 1>limited to one life, The prosecution ultimately treated the unborn

1486
01:24:20.359 --> 01:24:23.279
<v Speaker 1>child as another victim, and Moore was convicted on three

1487
01:24:23.359 --> 01:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>first degree murder counts. According to the reported case outcome,

1488
01:24:26.640 --> 01:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he received three consecutive life sentences in an additional eighty years.

1489
01:24:31.039 --> 01:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>That sentence marked the formal conclusion of the criminal case.

1490
01:24:34.520 --> 01:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But there is another kind of ending that only the

1491
01:24:36.560 --> 01:24:40.239
<v Speaker 1>people left behind can experience. Families have to continue. They

1492
01:24:40.239 --> 01:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>have to live with empty spaces. They have to remember

1493
01:24:42.840 --> 01:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>birthdays that will never be celebrated with the person they lost.

1494
01:24:46.039 --> 01:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>They have to hear the names of their loved ones

1495
01:24:47.880 --> 01:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in court documents and news reports instead of ordinary conversations.

1496
01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:55.319
<v Speaker 1>For Denise's family, the story would forever include the knowledge

1497
01:24:55.319 --> 01:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that she was carrying her unborn son when her life ended.

1498
01:24:58.560 --> 01:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>For Eilu's family, it would this include the memory of

1499
01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:03.039
<v Speaker 1>a man who went to work at a convenience store

1500
01:25:03.159 --> 01:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and never returned home. The investigation had answered who prosecutors

1501
01:25:06.800 --> 01:25:10.079
<v Speaker 1>believed was responsible, the jury had reached its verdict, the

1502
01:25:10.119 --> 01:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>sentence had been imposed, but the human consequences did not

1503
01:25:13.479 --> 01:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>end when the courtroom proceedings ended. That is often the

1504
01:25:16.239 --> 01:25:19.279
<v Speaker 1>part of a homicide case that disappears from headlines. The

1505
01:25:19.359 --> 01:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>investigation gets a conclusion, the defendant receives a sentence, the

1506
01:25:23.279 --> 01:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>cameras leave, but the victim's families remain, And in this case,

1507
01:25:27.039 --> 01:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there was another painful detail that would remain impossible to ignore.

1508
01:25:30.680 --> 01:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Denise's final known image was not taken in a hospital,

1509
01:25:33.960 --> 01:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at home with family, or during an ordinary moment of

1510
01:25:36.760 --> 01:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>preparation for her baby's arrival. It was surveillance footage inside

1511
01:25:40.239 --> 01:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an elevator, a brief recording that nobody would have considered

1512
01:25:43.760 --> 01:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>remarkable at the time. Yet after her death, those few

1513
01:25:46.960 --> 01:25:50.039
<v Speaker 1>seconds became a permanent record of the woman investigators were

1514
01:25:50.039 --> 01:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand. The camera could show where she was,

1515
01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>it could show who was beside her, It could show

1516
01:25:55.199 --> 01:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>her apparent fear, but it could not tell investigators everything

1517
01:25:58.359 --> 01:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that happened after the doors closed. That gap had to

1518
01:26:00.960 --> 01:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>be filled through the evidence gathered later, and that is

1519
01:26:03.479 --> 01:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>where the case leaves its most enduring impression. Sometimes the

1520
01:26:06.800 --> 01:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>most important evidence is not the dramatic discovery. Sometimes it

1521
01:26:10.479 --> 01:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is the small fragment that survives. A recording, a statement,

1522
01:26:14.239 --> 01:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a forensic result, a phone search, a witness call, a

1523
01:26:17.760 --> 01:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>trail that begins with one crime and unexpectedly exposes another.

1524
01:26:21.840 --> 01:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>In this case, those fragments ultimately formed a chain that

1525
01:26:25.119 --> 01:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>led from a convenience store shooting to an apartment, from

1526
01:26:27.880 --> 01:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>an apartment to Denise Middleton, and from Denise's death to

1527
01:26:31.079 --> 01:26:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a court room conviction. The chain began with violence, but

1528
01:26:34.359 --> 01:26:37.039
<v Speaker 1>it ended with a record of what investigators and prosecutors

1529
01:26:37.079 --> 01:26:39.319
<v Speaker 1>were able to prove, and somewhere at the center of

1530
01:26:39.319 --> 01:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that record is still the same image, Denise entering the elevator, alive, pregnant,

1531
01:26:44.800 --> 01:26:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and unaware that those few seconds would become part of

1532
01:26:47.359 --> 01:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the final evidence surrounding her life. The elevator footage could

1533
01:26:50.960 --> 01:26:55.239
<v Speaker 1>not answer every question, but it preserved something investigators desperately needed,

1534
01:26:55.399 --> 01:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a reference point. It showed Denise alive, it showed her

1535
01:26:58.520 --> 01:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with more, and it established moment before the long silence

1536
01:27:01.680 --> 01:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that followed After that recording, investigators had to work backward

1537
01:27:05.560 --> 01:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from the discovery of her remains. They had to determine

1538
01:27:08.520 --> 01:27:11.239
<v Speaker 1>what happened during the missing weeks and compare the available

1539
01:27:11.279 --> 01:27:15.319
<v Speaker 1>evidence with Moore's explanations. That process eventually brought together the

1540
01:27:15.359 --> 01:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>different strands of the investigation. The December eighth shooting, the

1541
01:27:18.840 --> 01:27:22.239
<v Speaker 1>surveillance footage from the convenience store, the witness who called police,

1542
01:27:22.600 --> 01:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the identification of Moore, the search of his apartment, the

1543
01:27:25.800 --> 01:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>discovery of Denise, the forensic examination, the evidence recovered from

1544
01:27:30.239 --> 01:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the crime scenes, and the statements more made during questioning.

1545
01:27:33.640 --> 01:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>None of those pieces existed in isolation. Together they formed

1546
01:27:37.119 --> 01:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the case that prosecutors presented against him. The store's shooting

1547
01:27:40.239 --> 01:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>had been the immediate trigger. Ailu a sixty one year

1548
01:27:43.199 --> 01:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>old cashier, was killed during a confrontation inside the store.

1549
01:27:46.840 --> 01:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Moore was identified as the suspected shooter, and investigators followed

1550
01:27:50.399 --> 01:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the trail to his apartment. What they found their transformed

1551
01:27:53.399 --> 01:27:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. Denise Middleton had apparently been dead for weeks.

1552
01:27:57.439 --> 01:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>She had been heavily pregnant, and, according to the report timeline,

1553
01:28:00.920 --> 01:28:04.079
<v Speaker 1>she had been living through an increasingly unstable relationship with

1554
01:28:04.119 --> 01:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>More before her death. Her disappearance had not ended with

1555
01:28:07.239 --> 01:28:10.279
<v Speaker 1>someone discovering her body in a public location. It had

1556
01:28:10.399 --> 01:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ended inside the apartment where investigators found her. That discovery

1557
01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>also meant that the December shooting had done something investigators

1558
01:28:17.239 --> 01:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>could never have anticipated. It exposed a hidden homicide. The

1559
01:28:20.880 --> 01:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>case eventually reached its legal conclusion, with More convicted of

1560
01:28:24.159 --> 01:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the reported murders of Ailieu and Denise, and the killing

1561
01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of Denise's unborn child. The sentence reflected the seriousness of

1562
01:28:30.880 --> 01:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>those convictions, but there is a difference between a case

1563
01:28:33.760 --> 01:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>being legally finished in a tragedy being emotionally finished. For

1564
01:28:37.560 --> 01:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Denise's loved Once the verdict could not restore the future

1565
01:28:40.800 --> 01:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>she had imagined, she had reportedly won its stability, she

1566
01:28:44.039 --> 01:28:46.359
<v Speaker 1>had been preparing for the arrival of her son, and

1567
01:28:46.439 --> 01:28:49.239
<v Speaker 1>whatever plans she had for motherhood ended before she could

1568
01:28:49.279 --> 01:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>experience them. For Isilu's family, the same truth applied. He

1569
01:28:52.960 --> 01:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had gone to work and never returned. His death became

1570
01:28:55.760 --> 01:28:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the first visible piece of a much larger investigation, and

1571
01:28:59.079 --> 01:29:02.359
<v Speaker 1>for the detectives and the apartment discovery ensured that the

1572
01:29:02.359 --> 01:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>December shooting would never be remembered as an isolated crime.

1573
01:29:06.079 --> 01:29:09.479
<v Speaker 1>It became the doorway into Denise's final chapter. Perhaps that

1574
01:29:09.560 --> 01:29:12.199
<v Speaker 1>is why the surveillance footage remains so haunting. There is

1575
01:29:12.239 --> 01:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>no dramatic explanation inside that elevator. There is no indication

1576
01:29:16.039 --> 01:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of what investigators would eventually discover. Denise simply enters. She

1577
01:29:20.079 --> 01:29:23.399
<v Speaker 1>is alive, she is pregnant, she appears frightened, and the

1578
01:29:23.439 --> 01:29:27.079
<v Speaker 1>doors close. Everything that followed had to be reconstructed afterward.

1579
01:29:27.359 --> 01:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>The camera could not follow her into the future. It

1580
01:29:29.920 --> 01:29:34.239
<v Speaker 1>could only preserve the moment before it disappeared. Investigators eventually

1581
01:29:34.279 --> 01:29:37.279
<v Speaker 1>followed the evidence through that darkness, from the store to

1582
01:29:37.319 --> 01:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, from the apartment to the forensic examination, and

1583
01:29:40.800 --> 01:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>from the investigation to the court room. The final result

1584
01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>gave the case a legal ending, but Denise's story is

1585
01:29:46.800 --> 01:29:49.359
<v Speaker 1>more than the circumstances of her death. It is also

1586
01:29:49.439 --> 01:29:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the story of a young woman who had been trying

1587
01:29:51.359 --> 01:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to build a life while facing instability, a woman whose

1588
01:29:54.520 --> 01:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>future was reduced to evidence after she was gone. Eilu's

1589
01:29:57.760 --> 01:30:00.239
<v Speaker 1>story is also more than the shooting that killed him.

1590
01:30:00.439 --> 01:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>He was a person with a life and a family

1591
01:30:02.680 --> 01:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>before he became a name in a homicide investigation. That

1592
01:30:05.880 --> 01:30:08.319
<v Speaker 1>is the part that can disappear when true crime becomes

1593
01:30:08.359 --> 01:30:12.399
<v Speaker 1>focused only on suspects and shocking discoveries. Behind every case

1594
01:30:12.439 --> 01:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>file are people who had futures, people who expected tomorrow

1595
01:30:15.720 --> 01:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to arrive, people who never knew that an ordinary day

1596
01:30:18.760 --> 01:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>would become their last. And in this case, tomorrow never

1597
01:30:21.920 --> 01:30:26.119
<v Speaker 1>came for Denise Ilieu or Denise's unborn child. What remained

1598
01:30:26.199 --> 01:30:30.159
<v Speaker 1>was evidence, testimony, surveillance footage, and the painstaking work of

1599
01:30:30.199 --> 01:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>investigators trying to reconstruct what happened. The investigation began with

1600
01:30:34.279 --> 01:30:37.119
<v Speaker 1>gunshots at a convenience store. It ended with a conviction

1601
01:30:37.239 --> 01:30:40.199
<v Speaker 1>connected to three deaths, But between those two points was

1602
01:30:40.239 --> 01:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a much darker discovery. Sometimes one crime does not simply

1603
01:30:43.840 --> 01:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>end a life. Sometimes it opens a door to another

1604
01:30:46.520 --> 01:30:49.399
<v Speaker 1>tragedy that had been hidden all along, because the full

1605
01:30:49.439 --> 01:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>story is never the one they told you. This is

1606
01:30:51.920 --> 01:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>us Dark Crimes
