Speaker 1: Yes, in a world of deceit, telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: it's Friday, the twenty sixth or seventh September of Our
Speaker 2: Lord twenty twenty five. Well, we were coming up to
Speaker 2: the five year statute limitations for James coming, and that's
Speaker 2: one of the reasons why I think Trump was having
Speaker 2: a fit. He wanted some movement on that. Of course
Speaker 2: they let that anniversary pass for James Clapper. We're going
Speaker 2: to take a look at Trump's mission, to which I
Speaker 2: think we can sum up in two parts, to take
Speaker 2: America down and take down his enemies and get revenge.
Speaker 2: So we're going to begin today with the rumors of war,
Speaker 2: because folks, there is no better way to take down
Speaker 2: America than with a massive war change the world, have
Speaker 2: a world war. We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: Good morning, and welcome to the show. Today, we've got
Speaker 3: Russian pilots dared data to start a war with a
Speaker 3: friendly wave. The US Navy puts on a light show
Speaker 3: with seventy five miles through a nuclear Thermo nuclear weapon test.
Speaker 3: Heg seth orders rare urgent meeting of hundreds of generals
Speaker 3: and admirals. Denmark claims state actors behind drone incursions. Russia
Speaker 3: denies involvement. Who's the paper tiger? Now that you will
Speaker 3: crack under the burden of Ukraine? French navy sees his
Speaker 3: nine point six tons of cocaine from fishing boat off
Speaker 3: West Africa must have been one heck of a fishing trip.
Speaker 3: I guess report Trump was made aware of Ukrainian counteroffensive
Speaker 3: plan that requires US intelligence support, and is Trump now
Speaker 3: supporting more fighting in Ukraine?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I didn't know that you caught fish with cocaine.
Speaker 3: Maybe it makes the fishing more interesting.
Speaker 2: Yeah, something is rotten in Denmark, however, and when we
Speaker 2: look at these different things that they're trying to use
Speaker 2: to nudge us into war, it truly is absurd. You know,
Speaker 2: they're just looking for any kind of a reason. And
Speaker 2: so this is an article from the Telegraph, which I
Speaker 2: thought the very fact that they had all these details
Speaker 2: tells you that the government and the military wanted them
Speaker 2: to write this story. I don't know if the government
Speaker 2: completely wrote it for them or what, but they took
Speaker 2: the narrative that was given to them by the government,
Speaker 2: saying that it's a long descriptive narrative like a top
Speaker 2: gun encounter, where these three Russian pilots enter Estonian airspace
Speaker 2: and the Italians who have they evidently defend Estonia. NATO
Speaker 2: does in rotation, they rotate different nations teams in and out.
Speaker 2: So at this point in time they had two Italian
Speaker 2: thirty five's Ghost one and Ghost two. They launch interception
Speaker 2: from the air base who was fifty kilometers outside the
Speaker 2: capitol of Tollin. For an instant, the course of world
Speaker 2: affairs rested on the shoulders of five men, three Russians
Speaker 2: and two Italians who are not in radio contact with
Speaker 2: each other. What do you think the purpose of this
Speaker 2: article is. I think the purpose of this article is
Speaker 2: to get people to predict a programming, to say, look
Speaker 2: at how close we came. And here you've got five guys.
Speaker 2: If one of them had made the wrong move or
Speaker 2: got trigger happy, this could have started World War three.
Speaker 2: And then they'll get everybody to understand this, and then
Speaker 2: they will tell us that something like this happened, so
Speaker 2: they can start World War three. The Italians began the
Speaker 2: routine of aerial intercept, rocking their wings from side to
Speaker 2: side in reply, Russians rocked their's back. Then one of
Speaker 2: the pilots raised his hand and gave a friendly wave.
Speaker 2: The next twelve minutes, the Italian pilots trailed the Russians
Speaker 2: all the way to the Russian enclave of Kalinigrad, an
Speaker 2: unprecedent length of time for an incursion into NATO airspace. Well,
Speaker 2: they were headed to an area that is under Russian control.
Speaker 2: And again, Kaliningrad. I should have looked this up, but
Speaker 2: I've seen this before. I believe it's landlocked. It's this
Speaker 2: enclave that is still there that the Russians have maintained
Speaker 2: control of even as they pulled out, kind of like Gitmo,
Speaker 2: let's say, except you can't get to it without crossing
Speaker 2: into the other country. And so just as we kept
Speaker 2: a foothold in Cuba at Gitmo, they have this foothold
Speaker 2: there in Estonia called Kaliningrad. So there was a bit
Speaker 2: of a legitimate reason for them to be there. The
Speaker 2: potential flashpoint has sparked days of intense discussion inside of
Speaker 2: NATO over when, where and how they might pull the trigger,
Speaker 2: because that's what this has all been about. They have
Speaker 2: been moving relentlessly and steadily towards this moment since the
Speaker 2: nineteen nineties. They continued even after the Soviet Union fell.
Speaker 2: Of course, they had no mission anymore because NATO was
Speaker 2: set there to oppose the Soviet Union. So what they
Speaker 2: decided they would do is to take over Russia, and
Speaker 2: they've gradually been moving in that direction with wars, civil
Speaker 2: wars and revolution and coups. We're really proud of how
Speaker 2: we react each time, said Lieutenant Colonel Gaetano Farina, the
Speaker 2: commander of the Italian Air Task Force that's under NATO command.
Speaker 2: Since the Italian rotation began in August first, k Farino's
Speaker 2: men have been scrambled seven times, but on every occasion
Speaker 2: until now, the interceptions have taken place over international waters.
Speaker 2: The latest incident came in a two week period in
Speaker 2: which Putin launched a space of operations designed to probe
Speaker 2: NATO's ability to defend its borders. And then they list
Speaker 2: these and not a single one can definitely be proven
Speaker 2: to be Putin. They are alleging this, but of course,
Speaker 2: you know, Trump kills people on boats without having any
Speaker 2: more proof than this, so why wouldn't they start a war?
Speaker 2: A barrage of drones fired into Poland. Now I've talked
Speaker 2: about this several times, and of course that's not at
Speaker 2: all what happened. I ended the show with that yesterday
Speaker 2: thing that more than anything, it shows the incompetence of NATO,
Speaker 2: that they're not ready for war. These were decoy drones
Speaker 2: that had no controls on them, no cameras on them, nothing.
Speaker 2: They were there to take the hits and to draw
Speaker 2: the fire away from the drones that really were dangerous,
Speaker 2: and so they didn't get These drones shot down over Ukraine,
Speaker 2: they shoot down to even the decoy drones and or
Speaker 2: they were con used by the electronic countermeasures that were there.
Speaker 2: And they get into Poland, but again they are not
Speaker 2: armed drones, and they go for a couple hundred kilometers
Speaker 2: into Poland. They scramble the NATO jets, they shoot very
Speaker 2: expensive missiles of these very cheap drones missed them, and
Speaker 2: one of the missiles falls down on a house and
Speaker 2: destroys it, even though it was a dud, the explosive
Speaker 2: didn't go off. And then the Polish prime minister are
Speaker 2: president I forget what his title was. One of them
Speaker 2: is the president, one of them is prime minister, and
Speaker 2: they are opposite sides of this. One of them does
Speaker 2: not want war, but Donald Tusk, who has been for
Speaker 2: a very long time affiliated with the EU and the
Speaker 2: World Economic Forum and so forth, wants war. And so
Speaker 2: he was trying to tell everybody that this is a
Speaker 2: drone that had done this to the house, when they
Speaker 2: knew full well by that time that it was one
Speaker 2: of their dud missiles that miss so again to say,
Speaker 2: you know, Putin has launched a barrage of drones. What
Speaker 2: a distortion of what really happened there. And then airports
Speaker 2: in Oslo and Copenhagen had to close due to unattributed drones.
Speaker 2: Even the telegraph says they're unattributed. Nobody knows who's flying
Speaker 2: these drones or for what purpose. I had said before
Speaker 2: that we might see the see Russia and China start
Speaker 2: to do attacks against infrastructure, you know, like airports where
Speaker 2: they shut them down. They might start to do that
Speaker 2: in a way that has deniability in it, and so
Speaker 2: it could be something like that. But don't you want
Speaker 2: to have something that is far more solid before you
Speaker 2: start a world war? Well not these guys, because they're
Speaker 2: looking for any excuse. And both sides, both sides, including Russia,
Speaker 2: are involved in brinksmanship, and this is I should tell
Speaker 2: you where we are headed. In the past ten years,
Speaker 2: Russia has violated Estonian airspace at least forty times. So
Speaker 2: why is this the one that is showing that we're
Speaker 2: leading up to World War three? Because now they want
Speaker 2: it so over the past ten years an average or
Speaker 2: four times a year, So why is this extraordinary? Well,
Speaker 2: they even did it when Putin was flying to Helsinki
Speaker 2: for twenty eighteen meeting with Trump, So why are they
Speaker 2: freaking out? Well, these other ones involved corner cutting, crossing
Speaker 2: over their territory by cutting a corner or something like that.
Speaker 2: How are this is going straight in? But it was
Speaker 2: going in to Cleningrad and that is what they want
Speaker 2: you to skip over. So although the Russians followed their
Speaker 2: naturally a great order of an intercept, they did not
Speaker 2: alter their course or steer out of Estonian airspace. NATO
Speaker 2: is enraged, but the Italian lieutenant Colonel Fenna says, well,
Speaker 2: it's our job. The men were relaxed. We're professionals. This
Speaker 2: one according to protocol. This is how we had intercepts,
Speaker 2: and they did their part of the dance. And we
Speaker 2: did our part of the dance type of thing. As
Speaker 2: soon as they're back in the hangars. Though, you had
Speaker 2: the politicians angry that they had not shot, and we
Speaker 2: just had Trump saying you should shoot. The politicians want war.
Speaker 2: The people who are going to fight the war no better.
Speaker 2: They're a little bit cooler heads. Fortunately, unfortunately, there will
Speaker 2: be somebody who will follow orders. The Estonian government does
Speaker 2: not assess the situation merited a kinetic reply, one which
Speaker 2: could lead to a far more explosive result in small nations.
Speaker 2: The small Baltic nation that shares a one hundred and
Speaker 2: eighty three mile border with Russia. The Russian jets are
Speaker 2: not headed toward the Estonian mainland, nor were they armed
Speaker 2: with missiles that could blow up targets on the ground.
Speaker 2: The very fact the story was given to the UK
Speaker 2: Telegraph shows that these people are preparing us for war.
Speaker 2: They think they're trying to nudge us to it. This
Speaker 2: is programmed by the press. This is nudge news, folks,
Speaker 2: and you need to be aware of what their agenda
Speaker 2: is behind all of this. By the way, tomorrow, while
Speaker 2: we're talking about war, tomorrow is the Occupy Peace rally
Speaker 2: at Gerald Sunte's Occupy Peace Organization, Kingston, New York. If
Speaker 2: you can go, you have a great time. There's going
Speaker 2: to be some great speakers that are there, and it's
Speaker 2: good to show that you stand for peace rather than
Speaker 2: for war. You can find out details about it at
Speaker 2: occupypeace dot com. US Navy puts on a light show
Speaker 2: with a seventy five hundred miles from the weapon test.
Speaker 2: This is kind of like gorillas from the zoo grabbing
Speaker 2: a bunch of dirt and throwing it up in the
Speaker 2: air and beating their chest. In fact, you talk about
Speaker 2: gorilla beating his chest. I had a friend who has
Speaker 2: a retired marine and he went to the zoo and
Speaker 2: they had a big silverette gorilla on the other side
Speaker 2: of the glass. And he looked at that gorilla, and
Speaker 2: the gorilla was really staring at him, and so Rick,
Speaker 2: you Rica's time, Mary, Rick beats his chest like a
Speaker 2: gorilla does and looks why he's looking at him, might
Speaker 2: not look And that gorilla just charged that glass with
Speaker 2: everything to the end. He said, he thought he's going
Speaker 2: to break the glass. But this is basically what these
Speaker 2: guys are doing with their nuclear weapons and their jets
Speaker 2: and on both sides. There's a lot of posturing and
Speaker 2: a lot of beating of the chest. The US Navy
Speaker 2: launched multiple triment ballistic missiles off the coast of Florida
Speaker 2: and into the Atlantic, and the latest test of a
Speaker 2: system that can deliver thermonuclear warheads thousands of miles away.
Speaker 2: An Ohio class submarine launched the unarmed weapons from a
Speaker 2: submerged position During tests one evening saw the skies light
Speaker 2: up as far away as Puerto Rico, as mariners and
Speaker 2: airmen were informed of the operation well in advance in
Speaker 2: order to establish safety zones along the missile's path. It
Speaker 2: comes as Russia declares NATO and EU you are now
Speaker 2: at war with Moscow in a chilling escalation. I think
Speaker 2: what they're saying is they have done everything except pull
Speaker 2: the trigger with us. They've pretty much declared, especially with Trump,
Speaker 2: that they want to have war. And then we have
Speaker 2: this unusual thing that's going on with Pete Hegseth, which
Speaker 2: people are trying to figure out. He's ordered hundreds of
Speaker 2: US generals and admirals together on very short notice for
Speaker 2: no stated reason, at a Marine Corps base in Virginia.
Speaker 2: And so this is creating confusion and alarm about what
Speaker 2: this is really about. They said it may be political
Speaker 2: because there's been several senior officials who have been fired
Speaker 2: and replaced, but why would you have to have them
Speaker 2: all there? That still doesn't make any sense. It's an
Speaker 2: unusual directive that was sent to virtually all of the
Speaker 2: military's top brass according to more than a dozen people,
Speaker 2: it was issued earlier this week, and it came against
Speaker 2: a potential government shutdown, and as hegsa's political moves have
Speaker 2: been deemed a since have deepened a sense of distress
Speaker 2: those who fear that he is erasing the Defense Department's
Speaker 2: status as a bipartisan institution. You believe that is a
Speaker 2: bipartisan institution. It's not political at all. It's totally political.
Speaker 3: War.
Speaker 2: So yeah, they both like war, and both parties have
Speaker 2: their preferred generals that are there. And of course the
Speaker 2: Pentagon has been incredibly involved in pushing the LGBT agenda
Speaker 2: and pushing the climate agenda. You know, we're going to
Speaker 2: have battery operate tanks. That's ridiculous. Denmark, as well as
Speaker 2: claiming that state actors were behind the drone in cursion,
Speaker 2: they haven't found anybody. Let me just say, this is
Speaker 2: as dangerous and as ludicrous as saying when there's been
Speaker 2: a cyber attack, the Russians did it. If anybody or
Speaker 2: the Chinese theat or pointing the finger at anybody, they
Speaker 2: can't know immediately, first of all. Secondly, because the release
Speaker 2: of Vault seven, we know that the US has the tools,
Speaker 2: has developed the tools to look like they are any
Speaker 2: sovereign nation that they choose to look like. And oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, those tools were leaked and now all
Speaker 2: the guys have it, so it's not just the US,
Speaker 2: but anybody can look like anyone, and there's absolutely no
Speaker 2: way that they can make that determination, especially immediately. As
Speaker 2: Gotre has pointed out many times, usually what you find
Speaker 2: out in these cyber attacks is that it's an inside job,
Speaker 2: somebody who is doing it for money or something like
Speaker 2: that from the inside. But that's the kind of investigation.
Speaker 2: You're not going to find it forensically by looking at
Speaker 2: the hack and that type thing, because they know a
Speaker 2: way to disguise that. But we have had that in
Speaker 2: the past. We've had them say, well, we know it's
Speaker 2: Russian because the way the keys are and all this
Speaker 2: other kind of stuff, and it's like you're assuming that
Speaker 2: people don't understand. Faulse seven was shown by wiki leaks
Speaker 2: that they could do exactly that. So Denmark is claiming
Speaker 2: that state actors are behind the droning cursons. You and
Speaker 2: I both know that they haven't proved, they haven't apprehended anybody,
Speaker 2: So how could they make that determination. It's a ludicrous
Speaker 2: lie that they're trying to dangerously escalate us into World
Speaker 2: War three. It's the only thing again to repeat what
Speaker 2: happened the first time it happened. It was in Copenhagen.
Speaker 2: Primarily they had two or three drones and for a
Speaker 2: couple of hours they would turn their lights on and
Speaker 2: flash their lights on to say, look, we're here. You know,
Speaker 2: just like when we had the drones on the East
Speaker 2: Coast that were flying around. Somebody wanted to be seen
Speaker 2: doing that. They wanted to create a sense of panic
Speaker 2: and that type of thing and to shut down infrastructure,
Speaker 2: the same thing that was happening now in Denmark. Maybe
Speaker 2: it's the same people who did on the East coast.
Speaker 2: Who knows, but I mean it could be NATO for
Speaker 2: all we know in terms of a state actor, because
Speaker 2: NATO did run Operation Gladio. Denmark claims unspecified state actors
Speaker 2: quote unquote are behind a series of drowning incursions this
Speaker 2: week shutdown airports and military installations in the country. Denmark's
Speaker 2: defense minister said these nighttime drone flights were hybrid attacks
Speaker 2: intended to spread fear. Well, I guess they worked, and
Speaker 2: now he's upping the fear. It's spending it even more.
Speaker 2: On Monday night, two or three large drones are spotted
Speaker 2: near Copenhagen Airport. Norway closed this airspace over Oslo Airport
Speaker 2: for three hours because they had a drone there was spotted.
Speaker 2: On Wednesday night, drone incursions near another airport forced it
Speaker 2: to shut down for three hours, and Denmark's second largest
Speaker 2: airport was closed for an hour as well. Some of
Speaker 2: the West speculate that the drones are linked to Russia,
Speaker 2: although Moscow rejects such claims. So something is rotten in Denmark,
Speaker 2: and really rotten. This thinks to the high heavens. Are
Speaker 2: we going to allow speculation and unidentified state actors to
Speaker 2: drag us into war? Well, they probably want over this
Speaker 2: won't do it over this particular issue, but it's just
Speaker 2: a constant drumbeat of fear coming from these people. You know,
Speaker 2: the Russians are here, the Russians are there, They're everywhere.
Speaker 2: So well, the question is, why would they even go
Speaker 2: to Denmark. Why wouldn't they go to a major country. No,
Speaker 2: slight intended to Denmark. Actually had some people who knew
Speaker 2: me when I went to report there, So I don't
Speaker 2: I don't want to trash your country, but it is
Speaker 2: not a big military power. Mean, why wouldn't they do
Speaker 2: it with France or Germany or UK or something like
Speaker 2: that if they wanted to tweak the people in the EU.
Speaker 2: So RT responded to Trump's paper tiger accusation. Who is
Speaker 2: the paper tiger now? They said, And they said, if
Speaker 2: you look carefully at what Trump was saying, even though
Speaker 2: he's calling Russia a paper tiger, he was saying Europe
Speaker 2: can take care of this, and he wasn't saying We're
Speaker 2: going to take care of it. Of course, that's what
Speaker 2: really would happen if they start a war, we would
Speaker 2: get drawn into it. But from RT, they said at
Speaker 2: the same time that Trump was saying that Russia was
Speaker 2: a paper tiger in big economic trouble, and because of that,
Speaker 2: he believed that the EU was in a position with
Speaker 2: Ukraine to take back all their territory in some of
Speaker 2: Russia's territory, they said. The problem is is that he
Speaker 2: said with the support of the European Union, they can
Speaker 2: take back of their stuff. He didn't say we're going
Speaker 2: to help him necessarily. So that's what Russia is reading
Speaker 2: into this, and they said that at the same time,
Speaker 2: he's saying that Russia is a paper tiger. In that
Speaker 2: same speech, you talked about what pitiful shape Europe was in,
Speaker 2: and we can all see that. That's pretty clear to see.
Speaker 2: So he lectured them on their self inflicted wounds over
Speaker 2: the climate insanity and over their cutoff of cheap Russian energy.
Speaker 2: It's all about the green madness. They've been driven insane
Speaker 2: by this green agenda. They've shut down their industry, they've
Speaker 2: made themselves poor, and they're not in a position to
Speaker 2: conduct a war, that's for sure. So he said it
Speaker 2: was meant as morale boos, except it probably doesn't sound
Speaker 2: all that encouraging if you look at what he said
Speaker 2: about Europe. With Europe's help, they can do this. Except
Speaker 2: he was saying that Europe is basically helpless and the
Speaker 2: country is being destroyed. As you point out earlier, the
Speaker 2: French Navy sees his nine point six tons of cocaine
Speaker 2: from a fishing boat off the coast of Africa. Why
Speaker 2: didn't they just kill these people instead of even searching
Speaker 2: the boat. That's the new approach from Trump, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Nobody has ever done that. This is why I say
Speaker 2: you can't understand just how criminal and over the top
Speaker 2: Trump's actions are. If it was a small country that
Speaker 2: was doing this, he would be indicted by the International
Speaker 2: Criminal Court, and he should be. He shouldn't get a
Speaker 2: pass just because he's president of the US. What he's
Speaker 2: doing is absolutely criminal. They at least stopped them and
Speaker 2: examine them. So I guess now, with the French connection,
Speaker 2: wish she enhactman when we needed. The French government can
Speaker 2: resell those nine point six tons of cocaine. Trump has
Speaker 2: been made aware of a Ukrainian counter offensive plan that
Speaker 2: requires US intelligence support. This is coming from anti war news,
Speaker 2: and this is according to the Wall Street Journal. Wall
Speaker 2: Street Journal was asking questions as why the sudden about
Speaker 2: face by Trump and marching off to war when he
Speaker 2: was saying he wanted peace and a Nobel Peace.
Speaker 3: Pro knowing Trump's Lensky probably showed up and just sucked
Speaker 3: up the entire time. Oh you are so great, you
Speaker 3: are such an amazing man. Donald Trump, Well, he did
Speaker 3: meet him like that. That's one of the things that say.
Speaker 2: They said that in the Wall Street Journal, they said,
Speaker 2: we know that Trump usually takes on the policy positions
Speaker 2: of the last person they talked to because he doesn't
Speaker 2: have any foundation of his own. He doesn't believe anything,
Speaker 2: so he just kind of regurgitates what the last person says.
Speaker 2: One of the reasons why he's all over the place,
Speaker 2: fascinating all over the place, because he talks a lot
Speaker 2: of different people.
Speaker 3: I really think can win. They were so sick of fanting.
Speaker 3: It was incredible.
Speaker 2: But this is coming from these analysts and the Pentagon
Speaker 2: and others, and I guess he now really believes the CIA,
Speaker 2: or maybe this is just all theater craft right. Trump
Speaker 2: is made aware of a planned Ukrainian counter offensive that
Speaker 2: requires US intelligence support before he posted a long statement
Speaker 2: on truth social where he insisted Ukraine could take all
Speaker 2: the territory that Russia's captured since twenty twenty two and
Speaker 2: might be able to even go further into Russia. The
Speaker 2: President made the post after spending time with a special
Speaker 2: envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg. Kellogg recently said that the
Speaker 2: US could kick Russia's behind and insisted that Ukraine could
Speaker 2: win the war despite Russia's continued gains in Eastern Ukraine
Speaker 2: and its clear advantage with manpower and industrial capacity. So
Speaker 2: he's now supporting more fighting in Ukraine. So as a
Speaker 2: New American and so they're looking at the people who
Speaker 2: are influencing them. One of the things that got New
Speaker 2: American very concerned was response of Lindsay like the way
Speaker 2: they put it when of Congress's most triggered happy lawmakers
Speaker 2: reposted a social media statement in which Trump suggested that
Speaker 2: he's changed his mind in favor of continue fighting in Ukraine.
Speaker 2: It's usually a bad sign when Lindsay Graham approves of
Speaker 2: something the President says, because Lindsey Graham is wrong about everything.
Speaker 2: He's one of those senators that is the Countra indicator
Speaker 2: for everything. Shortly after he scolded the UN delegation over
Speaker 2: his refusal to go along with him. His rhetoric was
Speaker 2: dramatically different from what Trump has been saying all year.
Speaker 2: His feelings towards Ukrainian and Russian heads of state have
Speaker 2: ebbed and flowed in accordance with his vacillating moods, and
Speaker 2: though he's more or less kept the weapons pipeline flowing
Speaker 2: to Ukraine, the President has been consistent in verbal support
Speaker 2: for an end to the fighting. So again, if he's
Speaker 2: going to talk out of both sides of his mouth,
Speaker 2: why would we be so surprised that finally he's saying
Speaker 2: the same thing out of his mouth both sides of
Speaker 2: his mouth. And it's the wrong approach, of course, the
Speaker 2: one that he has focused on. It's hard to imagine
Speaker 2: that Trump would go through all this without a true
Speaker 2: desire to end the world as new American. I disagree
Speaker 2: with that completely. The idea that he's faking a desire
Speaker 2: for peace is also undermined by a series of successful
Speaker 2: mediation efforts. Yeah, you know, like how he mediated with
Speaker 2: Iran in Israel. No, Actually, the fact that you know,
Speaker 2: if he's so serious about peace, you know, why would
Speaker 2: he be negotiating with Russia if he doesn't really want peace.
Speaker 2: You might want to remember what he did with Iran.
Speaker 2: He was negotiating with Iran just so that he could
Speaker 2: get them to let their guard down and then be attacked.
Speaker 2: So is it a ploy for peace? They ask? It's
Speaker 2: difficult to tell if this is just Trump being Trump.
Speaker 2: A common perception among political insiders is that he often
Speaker 2: broadcasts views and policy changes after being inspired by the
Speaker 2: most recent person to have persuaded him, because he always
Speaker 2: chickens out, and the always is it's all really just
Speaker 2: about what mood is the end today? You know what
Speaker 2: happened this morning. Trump's posts may also be employed designed
Speaker 2: to scare Russia into getting serious about a peace steal. Well,
Speaker 2: this guy is not a stable genius. He is an unstable,
Speaker 2: dangerously vacillating fool. Graham isn't the only one that gets
Speaker 2: excited at the idea of escalation. Dick Durbin advocated US
Speaker 2: militaper's action after Russian drones violated Polish airspace. And again,
Speaker 2: this is a nothing burger, And the polls after that
Speaker 2: incident activated article for the NATO Treaty of Provision prompting
Speaker 2: consultations within the Alliance when a member state believes it's
Speaker 2: been threatened, And so Denmark is now repeating their own
Speaker 2: false flag and so Lindsay Graham tweeted out a long
Speaker 2: thing talking about how we need to have war blah
Speaker 2: blah blah blah blah. And he finishes this sentence this
Speaker 2: is from Lindsay Graham. Time to end this blood path.
Speaker 2: Well done, mister President. No, the president saying we need
Speaker 2: to have a longer blood bath, we need to have
Speaker 2: more blood and Lindsey Graham, I've shown the clip before.
Speaker 2: Lindsey Graham and John McCain went to Ukraine years before
Speaker 2: Russia invaded, and it was when Ukraine was engaged, when
Speaker 2: Kiev was attacking its own people because they wanted to
Speaker 2: be independent of that government after the US led coup
Speaker 2: that was under Obama. Except that these two Republicans, John
Speaker 2: McCain and Lindsey Graham, who always loved war, were there
Speaker 2: as well. And what he was telling these troops was
Speaker 2: next year, we got a goat in there and get
Speaker 2: Peyton And you could see that they were not very
Speaker 2: enthused about that. He's been after regime change in Russia
Speaker 2: for the longest time. For him to end this long
Speaker 2: screed of his about how necessary continued war and escalated
Speaker 2: war is to end it to say that it's time
Speaker 2: to end this blood bath. That is the most hypocritical
Speaker 2: thing I've seen, even for Lindsey Graham. This is a
Speaker 2: new low of hypocrisy.
Speaker 3: And it's basically like you went in before this and
Speaker 3: that this would be a great place for a blood bath. Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 3: we could put one right over.
Speaker 2: There, all over this area. So one major move, says
Speaker 2: a new American, that could go a long way towards
Speaker 2: keeping America out of Europe's wars, is to get the
Speaker 2: US out of NATO. Well, it wasn't that exciting, you know,
Speaker 2: because Trump really wanted to get us out of NATO
Speaker 2: in his first Trump No he didn't. No, he didn't
Speaker 2: at all what he was doing, folks, You can look
Speaker 2: at this now in retrospect. It should be a twenty
Speaker 2: twenty vision to be able to see what he was
Speaker 2: actually doing with that talk about getting US out of NATO.
Speaker 2: You could see right away that he wasn't serious about
Speaker 2: getting US out of NATO. He was just trying to
Speaker 2: threaten them to get them to buy more US weapons.
Speaker 2: You need to get your spending up, You need to
Speaker 2: buy US military weapons equivalent to two percent of your GDP.
Speaker 2: That was all he was doing. He had no intention
Speaker 2: of getting out of NATO. And why was he pushing that.
Speaker 2: Was it just so that the US military industrial complex
Speaker 2: could make more money, or was Trump really trying to
Speaker 2: get them to armor up for World War three. We
Speaker 2: don't want World War three to be over too quickly,
Speaker 2: do we? I mean with the soft European states that
Speaker 2: have quit preparing to protect themselves because US has protected
Speaker 2: them since World War Two. They've taxed their citizens very heavily.
Speaker 2: I ported all into social services, not into preparation for war.
Speaker 2: So let's turn this thing around, because we're going to
Speaker 2: create this war. We want you guys to arm up,
Speaker 2: buy our equipment, and have enough equipment so that we
Speaker 2: can stretch this war out nice and long and do
Speaker 2: what we really want to do in terms of resetting
Speaker 2: the West. NATO is a globalist alliance. It threatens American
Speaker 2: sovereignty and interests, and it's very well addressed. Washington said,
Speaker 2: we should steer clear of permanent alliances with any of
Speaker 2: the foreign world. Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced
Speaker 2: a bill to withdraw the US from NATO. Do you
Speaker 2: hear Trump pressuring people do that? He doesn't want to
Speaker 2: get out of NATO. He doesn't want to get out
Speaker 2: of the UN. As a matter of fact, when you
Speaker 2: look at the agenda of using AI to police the
Speaker 2: bioweapon treaties, there's an article again I think that article
Speaker 2: is also a New American talking about what that would entail.
Speaker 2: It truly is amazing when you think of the extent
Speaker 2: of surveillance that'd be required to do that over everything. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean you going to look everywhere all the time
Speaker 2: in order to make sure that it is being complied with.
Speaker 2: And AI can handle that mountain of data. That's what
Speaker 2: it does well and sortsly that looking for a particular thing.
Speaker 2: And so this is the path to total surveillance. That's
Speaker 2: why it was created by the UN. Is yet another
Speaker 2: UN agenda being sold by American president, just like Nixon
Speaker 2: sold the UN War on drugs, now Trump is selling
Speaker 2: the UN AI inspection. So we're going to have to
Speaker 2: have some global entity that's going to use AI to
Speaker 2: surveil everything that we do. And just think about that. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, we can't have money laundering going on because
Speaker 2: of the war on drugs, so you have to set
Speaker 2: up this massive network of international surveillance of what is
Speaker 2: happening financially. And that's even before we get to digital
Speaker 2: currency CBDCs and stable coins and things like that. So
Speaker 2: this is going to be the same type of surveillance
Speaker 2: over everything. And we can see how the finsin. I
Speaker 2: think that's a it is like it's a sin like
Speaker 2: si n We can see the kind of surveillance that
Speaker 2: that has entailed. But now they have AI to help them.
Speaker 2: So Mike Lee has introduced ability inside NATO and they're
Speaker 2: not paying any attention to it. But the American gives
Speaker 2: you a link to the action page. They're at the
Speaker 2: John Birch Society if you want to push for that.
Speaker 2: I just don't think that there's anybody in Washington other
Speaker 2: than maybe Mike Lee who wants to get us out
Speaker 2: of NATO, especially not Trump. Well, let's take a look
Speaker 2: at some of the comments and we'll take a break.
Speaker 3: That's right, Shelly A. Heg Seth is gathering the General's
Speaker 3: eight hundred of them, ha ha, like witches at black Masses.
Speaker 3: KWD sixty eight Pentagram.
Speaker 2: You're surprised I didn't go to the Pentagram to do it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, just like which is KWD sixty eight. Trump admen
Speaker 3: giving ten million grant for development of elementary and Middle
Speaker 3: school programs to teach the tale mud make his real
Speaker 3: great again. National Endowment for the Humanities.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the largest grant the National Endowment for the
Speaker 2: Humanities has ever made. So that's an all new record
Speaker 2: because it's very important for everyone in America to know
Speaker 2: the tale mood, isn't It tells you who owns Trump
Speaker 2: and the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: KWD sixty eight. MAGA doesn't need nudge news whatever their
Speaker 3: Orange over lord says, even if it refutes what he
Speaker 3: just said. Thank you for your attention, Brad Soder new
Speaker 3: Trump shots KWD sixty eight. Trump will say the right
Speaker 3: thing often, but never do the right thing.
Speaker 2: That's right. You know, when you're running, as I said
Speaker 2: this when he was running the first time, what you're
Speaker 2: looking for in a candidate is do they understand what
Speaker 2: the problems are? Trump understood what the problems were, but
Speaker 2: he didn't do anything about it. And that's what you
Speaker 2: look for if you vote for somebody a second time.
Speaker 2: If they understand what the problems are and they don't
Speaker 2: do a thing about it, it's a hard pass as
Speaker 2: far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 3: Soiling goy for a prepper, make sure to get some
Speaker 3: school desk from the nineteen sixties for protection. That's right,
Speaker 3: you can inside there the tenant oracle of truth. Now
Speaker 3: we know why drones were practicing over our over our
Speaker 3: New England last year. Don't frag me bro. Haven't seen
Speaker 3: you in a while, with frag me bro, good to
Speaker 3: see you. Consider that a war would be a great
Speaker 3: cover for the government to carpet bomb any area of
Speaker 3: people that might stand up. Yeah, shelly A, they just
Speaker 3: do blood sacrifice rituals. With bombs, you can get a
Speaker 3: lot more blood all at once KWD sixty eight. Trump
Speaker 3: said in first week he would release Epstein records and
Speaker 3: the Ukraine War and open Fort Knox. So far, we're
Speaker 3: zero for three on those, shelly A. They all work together.
Speaker 3: Nothing happens without a banker.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Not only were zero for three on those things,
Speaker 2: but this like who had it on their bingo card
Speaker 2: that we were going to kind of go to war
Speaker 2: with Canada at least a verbal war, and it's having
Speaker 2: economic repercussions as well, all these tariffs that Cando would
Speaker 2: be falsely labeled as a center for fentanel. These narratives
Speaker 2: are just beyond stupidity. This is really professional wrestling stuff.
Speaker 2: He learned very well.
Speaker 3: Didney guard Goldsmith onward Maga soldiers marching off to war.
Speaker 3: The Trump statements are so reckless and MAGA folks don't protest.
Speaker 3: So KWD sixty eight. Trump is drawing out the deep state.
Speaker 3: Just trust the plan.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's drawing them out and they've got their knives
Speaker 2: drawn as well.
Speaker 3: The Patriots are in charge, folks. Just trust the plan.
Speaker 3: Let me make some cryptic tweets ature that you can
Speaker 3: interpret any way you want.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, North American house hippo, Good morning, handy, expect the
Speaker 3: day off. I showed up at work at two thirty
Speaker 3: this morning. They wouldn't let me work because their computer
Speaker 3: said my CDL was expired. Never mind I was holding
Speaker 3: the darned thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: ID to look forward to with digital ideas for everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Somewhat related story. My wife's father was in the military.
Speaker 3: He was in Vietnam, and of course he has VA
Speaker 3: benefits because of that, and he went in one time
Speaker 3: to get medically checked up and they said, well, we've
Speaker 3: got this person and this person. He goes, yeah, those
Speaker 3: are my children, but you know your name, it says
Speaker 3: you're dead. It took them two years to declare him
Speaker 3: not dead. Obviously I'm not dead because I am here.
Speaker 3: So I said, well, you know, my hands are tied.
Speaker 3: The computer says you're dead, So I don't know what
Speaker 3: to tell you.
Speaker 2: Imagine, if it's AI right.
Speaker 3: You'll never be able to get anyone on the phone.
Speaker 3: You'll never be able to actually look at you. It staid,
Speaker 3: the AI is just going to send a drone to
Speaker 3: actually make it true.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these guys never heard garbage in, garbage out.
Speaker 4: I guess we've fixed the error space.
Speaker 3: Ap rumble.
Speaker 2: Seat.
Speaker 3: World leaders are all in with and Minion's tows centralized control.
Speaker 3: That's why all sovereignations are being brought down in lockstep.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they all do the same thing. It's not just
Speaker 2: the COVID pandemic. That was the amazing thing that should
Speaker 2: have been a wake up call in so many ways
Speaker 2: to people. You know, look at this, every country doing
Speaker 2: the same thing, regardless of their stated philosophy or political
Speaker 2: party that's in charge, and they're doing it at exactly
Speaker 2: the same time. Well, they're linked up on the ID
Speaker 2: stuff as well, And we're gonna be talking about that
Speaker 2: when we come back. But first we're going to cover
Speaker 2: some news after the break. We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: Joy listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 5: Elvis, the Beatle, and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 5: them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Welcome back.
Speaker 3: I'm going to cover YouTube rebands Alex Jones, Nick Fuentist.
Speaker 3: After touting commitment to free expression that didn't last song.
Speaker 3: US threatens to bar foreigners over remarks about Charlie kirk.
Speaker 3: Two point two billion ivan PA solar facility in California
Speaker 3: schedule to be turned off after years of wasted money.
Speaker 3: UN blames Trump's team for non working escalator and teleprompter.
Speaker 3: What does Trump's team have to do with servicing the
Speaker 3: UN escalators is my question?
Speaker 2: Well, they said that they went on first, you could
Speaker 2: see some people getting on first, and said they went on,
Speaker 2: went up to the top, and somebody up there flip
Speaker 2: the switch off or something. I don't know why they
Speaker 2: would do that, or it's all who cares? Schoolators stopped?
Speaker 2: Was he humiliated?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 2: Did he survive walking up the steps, Yeah, he's got
Speaker 2: some circulation issues or whateverybody was able to make.
Speaker 4: It effect really wouldn't have been a big deal if
Speaker 4: he hadn't made a big deal about it. And everyone
Speaker 4: knows that he's in charge of his own telepropter. I
Speaker 4: who thought that was the un that did that to him?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, it's like he's trying to escalate it or something.
Speaker 3: Aggressive. Squirrel attacks send San Francisco Bay Area residents to
Speaker 3: the er. Squirrels are dangerous, they're squirrely.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Trump laughingly attacks CNN at Turkey Oval Office photo op
Speaker 3: Washington forcing speeding offenders to install GPS speed limitters.
Speaker 2: That's a big one.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's that's coming for everyone. They're not going to
Speaker 3: let you speed eventually. GP Dems using Charlie Kirk's death
Speaker 3: in campaign ads. Trump excludes Biden from Presidential Walk of Fame.
Speaker 2: Nothing is too petty for this guy. You know.
Speaker 3: It's on one hand, it's funny, it's legitimately funny. On
Speaker 3: the other hand, Yeah, you kind of feel like the
Speaker 3: president should be above this sort of thing if.
Speaker 2: He hadn't also, at the same time said that he's
Speaker 2: going to come after three enemies. You know, it's Latitia,
Speaker 2: James Schiff, and indict Comy. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Former FBI director James Comy to be indicted in days. Yeah,
Speaker 3: Insiders reveal Pam Bondi has concerns about charging James Comy.
Speaker 2: Imagine if we were to take Department of Justice officials
Speaker 2: who lied and send them to prison, and that's what
Speaker 2: she's imagining.
Speaker 3: You start indicting these scumbacks in Washington. That's a dangerous precedent.
Speaker 3: You don't know where that might stop.
Speaker 2: Liars shouldn't be throwing these stones and glasshouses, right.
Speaker 3: Okeef Bombshell, Senior d j Epstein investigator. It's notorious Peto
Speaker 3: was a CIA and Israeli asset and undercover video. No, no,
Speaker 3: it can't be.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well there's more to that article than the surface
Speaker 2: thing there. What it is really about, it's covering up
Speaker 2: for Trump. So yeah, let's begin with the YouTube rebands.
Speaker 2: So I didn't rush out and do that. I said, well,
Speaker 2: let's wait a couple of days and see what happens.
Speaker 2: Maybe we'll do it over the weekend. And then it
Speaker 2: became pretty apparent right away because Alex Jones did rush
Speaker 2: out and Nick Fuenty's are the people that work for him.
Speaker 2: He's got a big crew from they got on YouTube
Speaker 2: and then they banned them and more layers of this
Speaker 2: onion are being pulled back. My thing is is that
Speaker 2: I'd look at this and I say, well, if Google
Speaker 2: groups me with Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones, then their
Speaker 2: search engine is absolutely clueless about what I'm actually saying.
Speaker 2: Jim Jordan had claimed that Google had committed to offer
Speaker 2: all creators again, all creators banned from YouTube for political speech,
Speaker 2: the opportunity to return the platform. That is not what
Speaker 2: the letter said. And this is what Chris Manheim is saying.
Speaker 2: He said an information libration. He had said this before.
Speaker 2: He said, if you read it, that's absolutely not what
Speaker 2: it's saying. And so Alice Shows and Nick Quinte set
Speaker 2: up new channels on Wednesday and immediately had them taken
Speaker 2: down or within twenty four hours. Google did tout its
Speaker 2: commitment to quote unquote free expression, but they only said
Speaker 2: if the company terminated their channels for repeated violations of
Speaker 2: COVID nineteen and election integrity policies that are no longer
Speaker 2: in effects. A lot of caveats about that, but it's
Speaker 2: very narrowly defined. There are many other things that are
Speaker 2: not allowed, but you are not allowed to know what
Speaker 2: those many other things are it's like the no fly zone.
Speaker 2: That's no speech zone that YouTube is. So if you
Speaker 2: can only guess at what is ver Bolten, then that
Speaker 2: helps to stifle speech. It helps to propagate fear from
Speaker 2: people and self policing of their speech.
Speaker 4: It's also just it shows their hypocrisy and idiocy with
Speaker 4: Oh well, during COVID nineteen, we were banning people for
Speaker 4: saying things that turned out to be true. So we'll
Speaker 4: allow those people back on. But anyone else has any
Speaker 4: form of three speech that we disagree with, they can't talk.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, you know, whatever the government says is true
Speaker 2: or false at a particular time. They will be the
Speaker 2: handmaid of government sensors, will terminate new channels from previously
Speaker 2: terminated users. We'll have more to share on the limited
Speaker 2: pilot program soon, they came out and said, so YouTube
Speaker 2: will only be reinstating channels that they approve under a
Speaker 2: limited pilot program, which has not even started yet. So
Speaker 2: that's the reality. So again, what this was all about
Speaker 2: was Jim Jordan grandstanding yet again, virtue signaling yet again,
Speaker 2: and lying as usual while he gives cover to bad
Speaker 2: actors like Google and YouTube. This is what he does
Speaker 2: all the time. That's what Trey Goudi did. Trey Goudy
Speaker 2: got a job at Fox News for doing that, but
Speaker 2: he never did anything about Ben Gazi or any of
Speaker 2: these other things. He holds hearings over something that everybody
Speaker 2: knows is wrong, he never takes any action about it,
Speaker 2: and he always uses it for his own purpose. So
Speaker 2: I guess that also has not changed. Right, Not only
Speaker 2: has the censorship that YouTube not changed, but the Republican
Speaker 2: congressmen who are doing this stuff have not changed. So
Speaker 2: the US is threatening to bar foreigners over remarks about
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk. Again, Now you're not allowed to talk about
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk. What is it that you're not allowed to
Speaker 2: say about Charlie Kirk, Well, anything that's negative. So just
Speaker 2: watch your even if you have sympathy for his family,
Speaker 2: if you don't like what he had to say, they
Speaker 2: won't let you in. And we have a situation like that,
Speaker 2: they're going to pull the visas and or deport people
Speaker 2: who they say trivialize Charlie Kirk's murder. But it's more
Speaker 2: than that, it's just it's even if you disagree with
Speaker 2: his position on politics, and of course, Charlie Kirk never
Speaker 2: kicked anybody out of any of his events because they
Speaker 2: disagreed with them. He invited disagreement, not the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: They're you looking for any excuse they can, not only
Speaker 2: to get us unto war, but any excuse that they
Speaker 2: can find to go to war against the First Amendment. Particularly,
Speaker 2: they're political enemies. The GOP loves censorship as much as
Speaker 2: the Democrats, and they are out to get their enemies,
Speaker 2: whether by hook or by crook, just like the Democrats did.
Speaker 2: Law doesn't matter. Principles like free speech do not matter
Speaker 2: to either party. So there's a new test for foreigners
Speaker 2: want to enter the United States. What have they said
Speaker 2: about Charlie Kirk. This is a New York Times article.
Speaker 2: Dozens of people appear to be in line to be
Speaker 2: barred from the country, including a Brazilian congressman, a Mexican
Speaker 2: political commentator, a South African journalist. According to online posts
Speaker 2: from the State Department official who has now been appointed
Speaker 2: the little Charlie Kirk sensors are I have the Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk seat for censorship at the State Department. It's so
Speaker 2: or well in the double think. You know, here's a guy,
Speaker 2: as I said, many times he's spent his major thrust
Speaker 2: and I disagree with them on some of the arguments
Speaker 2: that he made. I disagree to them with some of
Speaker 2: his positions on issues, and I disagreed with him on
Speaker 2: the way that he made the arguments. Even when we
Speaker 2: agreed on the position, I thought that's not really a
Speaker 2: good way to make that argument. But nevertheless, he was
Speaker 2: always about trying to engage in free speech and debate
Speaker 2: and trying to bring that back to the universities, and
Speaker 2: I think also at the same time showing people that
Speaker 2: the universities were really too far gone. He knew that,
Speaker 2: And I gave you the article from Alex Newman, who
Speaker 2: had talked to him on multipleccasions about the necessity for
Speaker 2: us to shut down these institutions that we call higher learning.
Speaker 2: They're what are we e? We're going to learn that
Speaker 2: they think that they're higher than free speech and anyone else,
Speaker 2: and we need to stop subsidizing that anyway against anyone
Speaker 2: perceived to have trivialized, cordoned, or wrongly cast blame in
Speaker 2: mister Kirk's murder. So be careful if you don't buy
Speaker 2: the government narrative, if you are a conspiracy theorist about
Speaker 2: the murder, they will throw you out. And again when
Speaker 2: you look at the long list of absurdities that they
Speaker 2: have put out about this shooter, you know he left
Speaker 2: the you know he thirty minutes. He goes across the
Speaker 2: campus with a disassembled rifle that he hides, and we
Speaker 2: don't know how he was able to hide those long aparts.
Speaker 2: And then he gets up to the roof, he reassembles it,
Speaker 2: and then he recalibrates it and all this other kind
Speaker 2: of stuff so that he can take a one shot approach.
Speaker 2: And then he disassembles it again, leaves the screwdriver up there,
Speaker 2: climbs down supposedly with a disassembled rifle that you can't
Speaker 2: see on him, then reassembles it in the woods without
Speaker 2: the screwdriver that he'd left on the roof, and leaves
Speaker 2: the rifle there to be found, along with other confessions
Speaker 2: written on bullets that he didn't use. But don't say
Speaker 2: anything about that or you'll get panned. Another striking case
Speaker 2: in which the administration appears to be using ideology as
Speaker 2: a litmus test for which foreigners can visit former senior
Speaker 2: State Department official Ricardo's Zuniga, who served under five presidents,
Speaker 2: including mister Trump, said, would the same rules apply to
Speaker 2: someone who ridiculed attacks on the opponents of the administration? Well.
Speaker 2: In June, the State Department required many applicants to make
Speaker 2: their social media content public, and in July an official
Speaker 2: testified that online criticism of the war in Gaza could
Speaker 2: weigh against these applicants. In nineteen fifty two, law barred
Speaker 2: members of communist parties from immigrating to the United States.
Speaker 2: This is from New York Times. Interestingly enough, it was
Speaker 2: that very law that ilhan Omar's father was able to
Speaker 2: get by. And you know he was He was a
Speaker 2: member of the Smalian government. He was a member of
Speaker 2: the Smalian Communist Party. That was public information and for
Speaker 2: him to be able to come into the country based
Speaker 2: on this nineteen fifty two law. He violated that law
Speaker 2: when he came in. And all of his family is
Speaker 2: here under false pretenses, in violation of that law.
Speaker 3: Send them back, Send them back.
Speaker 2: In another case, the South African journalist wrote that she
Speaker 2: had empathy for Kirk's family. For Kirk because he believed
Speaker 2: gun related deaths were acceptable and a small price to
Speaker 2: pay for gun ownership. I've said that that's one of
Speaker 2: the arguments is that I don't think that's a good
Speaker 2: way to support the Second Amendment. It's also not a
Speaker 2: good way to support the Second Amendment by saying more
Speaker 2: people die from cars, because we're going to show you
Speaker 2: how they're going to be using that. They're already starting
Speaker 2: with it. So, as I said before, I would agree
Speaker 2: with him on some of his positions, I would disagree
Speaker 2: with him on some of his arguments on those positions,
Speaker 2: and I would disagree with him on some of his
Speaker 2: positions on things. So that's not allowed anymore. Now he's
Speaker 2: now a canonized saint. So this woman who says that
Speaker 2: she disagreed with that, she's now not going to be
Speaker 2: allowed to enter the country.
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, the reason that's a bad argument is because he's
Speaker 4: accepting the assumption that gun control laws make people safer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, gun control laws make people safer, and guns kill.
Speaker 2: That's what he's saying, and then he says it's worth it. Basically,
Speaker 2: that's what they're hearing, and neither of those premises are true.
Speaker 2: You don't win by accepting the false premises of the
Speaker 2: other side. GOP and the Democrats are using Charlie Kirk's
Speaker 2: death in campaign ads. We can understand why the GOP
Speaker 2: would be using it, but it's odd to see that
Speaker 2: the left is using it. Occasional Cortex Alexandria Occasional Cortex
Speaker 2: released a campaign email last week condemning the scourge of
Speaker 2: political violence and the conservative leader's rhetoric. She said, we
Speaker 2: can condemn this horrific assassination and the scourge of political
Speaker 2: violence without uplifting these ideas. She said, so everything is
Speaker 2: about Charlie Kirk on both sides of it. But for
Speaker 2: comic relief, again, we look at Trump the pettiness. I mean,
Speaker 2: this was not done as a joke, as a troll.
Speaker 2: It would be funny if it was. As we were
Speaker 2: saying before this presidential Walk of Fame. Here's what it
Speaker 2: looks like. Here. You can see he's got all the
Speaker 2: presidential portraits there in a very long line until it
Speaker 2: gets down to Biden, and then what you see is
Speaker 2: a picture not of a person's face, but a picture
Speaker 2: of an auto pen right there in between. I guess
Speaker 2: two of them, you know, two Trump pictures that are there.
Speaker 2: So Trump's up there twice and Biden is not up
Speaker 2: there once. Instead, they've got a picture of his autopen.
Speaker 2: It really is. The thing that takes away from the
Speaker 2: joke is that it's not really a joke. It's just
Speaker 2: his pettiness that is there. So we can see that
Speaker 2: in him some of the other statements that he made.
Speaker 2: The Walk of Fame is part of a broader White
Speaker 2: House renovations under Trump, including gold gilding in the Oval Office,
Speaker 2: a marble patio in the Rose Garden modeled after as
Speaker 2: Florida State mar Lago, and a new ballroom under construction,
Speaker 2: and the installation of two seven meter flag poles on
Speaker 2: the White House lawn, which Trump has described as the
Speaker 2: best polls anywhere in the country or in the world.
Speaker 2: Nobody's got boles like this. Do they drive us? Yeah?
Speaker 3: The best?
Speaker 2: Yeah, not even Poland has poles like this. Right.
Speaker 4: It's a great material.
Speaker 3: Love those polls, the great polls.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So he doesn't love James Comy, he doesn't love
Speaker 2: Adam Schiffer, Latitia James, and neither do we. However, when
Speaker 2: you look at this, it raises a lot of questions.
Speaker 2: James Comey is accused of going to be indided, they say,
Speaker 2: in days, because they're about to run out of the
Speaker 2: statute limitations. September thirtieth, twenty twenty, he testified to Congress
Speaker 2: and they say that he lied in that testimony and
Speaker 2: a Saturday posts the truth social Trump slammed Bondy over
Speaker 2: three people who have committed alleged crimes and not faced
Speaker 2: criminal charges, Adam Schiff, Letisia James, and James Comy. And
Speaker 2: I think that all of them have something should be
Speaker 2: done about it. But I said, from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: I said, I don't think that people who weaponize the
Speaker 2: government and lawfair now that includes Trump, should be allowed
Speaker 2: to get away with it. But it also should not
Speaker 2: be seen as petty and personal. And I said, if
Speaker 2: you remember, I said, as Trump is about to be installed,
Speaker 2: I said, he is going to do this in a
Speaker 2: way that doesn't strengthen the rule of law. He's going
Speaker 2: to do it in a way that strengthens him as
Speaker 2: a mafia. Don you know, don't mess with me, not like,
Speaker 2: don't violate the law, because we'll punish people to do that. No,
Speaker 2: don't mess with me personally. That's the message that he's
Speaker 2: sending to people. And so insiders say that Pam Bondi
Speaker 2: has concerns about charging James Comy, do you think that
Speaker 2: somebody like her, who has lied publicly for Trump many
Speaker 2: many times already in just a few months, you think
Speaker 2: she'd be kind of concerned about where this might leave
Speaker 2: or already she's done this with not just the Epstein docs,
Speaker 2: but she's done it with a lot of other things
Speaker 2: as well, so as Cash betel So has Den, Bongino.
Speaker 2: These people are lying left and right, and everybody sees it.
Speaker 2: And we all saw the lies from James Komy that
Speaker 2: were there, and we all saw the lies from James Clappers,
Speaker 2: I pointed out yesterday, lying about the surveillance of Americans
Speaker 2: and violation of the FISA Act and the Constitution. And
Speaker 2: he was never never charged for lying to Congress. And
Speaker 2: that was a significant lie. It wasn't just about something
Speaker 2: that was going to affect another politician. Bondi has concerns
Speaker 2: about the case, which focuses on whether Comy made false
Speaker 2: statements during congressional testimony during the twenty sixteen investigation into
Speaker 2: Russian interference in the US presidential election. According to a
Speaker 2: person who's familiar with her thinking, though she believes it
Speaker 2: would be possible to bring an indictment, this is CNN,
Speaker 2: saying this, if the Attorney General gives the go ahead
Speaker 2: to newly install US attorney Lindsay Halligan, a former Trump
Speaker 2: personal attorney, she could begin presenting evidence to a grand
Speaker 2: jury right away. Halligan has been spotted at the Justice
Speaker 2: Department twice this week. Halligan has also questions about the case.
Speaker 2: According to a source that was briefed on the discussions,
Speaker 2: so testimony at the heart of the case came. It
Speaker 2: will be five years ago on Tuesday. There is a
Speaker 2: five year statute limitations for bringing perjury charges, which they
Speaker 2: allowed to expire with James Clapper. But think about this.
Speaker 2: We have a five year statue limitations for perjury to Congress.
Speaker 2: There's a three year statute limitations for pedophiles. What does
Speaker 2: that tell you about Congress? Just think about those two
Speaker 2: things for a little bit, and it tells you everything
Speaker 2: you need to know about Washington, about the Epstein documents
Speaker 2: and everything else. Three year statute limitations for pedophiles, five
Speaker 2: year statute limitations for lying to Congress. And guess which
Speaker 2: one would have the higher chance of being brought against somebody.
Speaker 2: So I just want people to act, he said, And
Speaker 2: we want to act fast. If they're not guilty, that's fine.
Speaker 2: If they are guilty, or if they should be charged,
Speaker 2: they should be charged. And we have to do it now,
Speaker 2: he said, because he's running out of his statute limitations. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we have from James O'Keeffe a bombshell that Alice Jones
Speaker 2: is all over senior doj. Epstein investigator admits Notorious Petro
Speaker 2: was a CIA and Israeli asset. This is in an
Speaker 2: undercover video that James O'Keefe and his people shot. So
Speaker 2: how about that. We never knew that, did we We
Speaker 2: didn't know that he operated for the CIA and for
Speaker 2: a masade. But it's the guy confirming this. Yeah. So Alex, however,
Speaker 2: uses this in a strange way to excuse Trump. The
Speaker 2: ex Department of Justice investigator Glenn Peger said he interviewed
Speaker 2: Epstein's rape victims and investigated his flight logs he worked
Speaker 2: as let's see, he worked at the Department of Justice
Speaker 2: doing this. According to Peger, every time an Epstein case
Speaker 2: was set to go to trial, the billionaire human trafficker
Speaker 2: would pay off the families of those that he was
Speaker 2: molesting and prostituting. Epstein would just pay them off. They
Speaker 2: were just like these little kids, they pay off their family.
Speaker 2: They're all broke, these kids and their poor families. So
Speaker 2: you paid them off like anywhere from a one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty thousand to five hundred thousand. That's nothing in
Speaker 2: this guy's world. Regarding Trump, he explained that there's no
Speaker 2: evidence of him ever being on an Epstein airplane when
Speaker 2: children are being raped, but that he is allowing the
Speaker 2: federal government to protect others who have dirt on their hands. Now,
Speaker 2: I want you to think about that for a second,
Speaker 2: whether you believe that's true or not. And even if
Speaker 2: it were true, do you really think that Trump is
Speaker 2: altruistically protecting other people? Does he put himself in this
Speaker 2: kind of a spot and he understands how even Maga
Speaker 2: is upset with him over this particular issue. Would he
Speaker 2: put himself in that kind of a spot to help
Speaker 2: other people? Have you ever seen Trump act altruistically when
Speaker 2: it comes to politics. He is the most self centered
Speaker 2: narcissist I've ever seen in the office in my entire life.
Speaker 3: Just your friendly neighborhood pedro protector.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and these guys to say that he wasn't on
Speaker 2: the plane when they did this is narrowly defining his
Speaker 2: involvement with Epstein and his sexual involvement with these miners
Speaker 2: as a pedophile. This is narrowly defining it so that
Speaker 2: it's to cover up all the time that he spent
Speaker 2: without He was with him constantly, not just on the airplane,
Speaker 2: he was with him constantly. And so to say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, I never knew that he raped anybody on
Speaker 2: a Tuesday. You know, that's not that's not an excuse,
Speaker 2: that's not a justification. But that's the way he's being
Speaker 2: presented by this guy, by James O'Keeffe and by Alex Jones. Here. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Trump is altruistic. He would take the heat for all
Speaker 2: these other people. Come on, give me a break. You
Speaker 2: think we were born yesterday. These people think you were
Speaker 2: born yesterday. Trump is suddenly hesitant to release the files
Speaker 2: he said since he was not involved in the trafficking network,
Speaker 2: suggesting that he's protecting a lot of other people. So
Speaker 2: here's the issue. Even if their narrative is true, and again,
Speaker 2: you know, it doesn't say that he didn't get involved
Speaker 2: in shady stuff elsewhere at other times and other locations,
Speaker 2: But that does not excuse what he's doing. Simply makes
Speaker 2: him an accessory to the fact. And is that to say, what,
Speaker 2: he didn't do the murder. He just helped the murderer
Speaker 2: get away. How is that a good thing? You know?
Speaker 2: For Trump? He's being blackmailed by Israel or what? Two
Speaker 2: point two billion dollars solar plant in California is scheduled
Speaker 2: to be turned off. This is a solar plant which
Speaker 2: features three four hundred and fifty nine foot towers, thousands
Speaker 2: of computer controlled mirrors known as heliostats, and cost two
Speaker 2: point two billion dollars to build. This is a solar
Speaker 2: power facility that was set up not using the typical
Speaker 2: photovill take cells that you see everywhere. This is set
Speaker 2: up to focus the sun's light and create this incredibly
Speaker 2: hot thing. When you look at the picture of it,
Speaker 2: I think they've got a picture for the down the article.
Speaker 2: You got these three glowing towers and it's like looking
Speaker 2: at Lord of the Rings. Which one of those is
Speaker 2: sour on en? I don't know. Construction began in twenty ten,
Speaker 2: was complete in twenty fourteen. Now it is set to
Speaker 2: close twelve years later after failing to efficiently generate social
Speaker 2: solar energy. In twenty eleven, the US Department of Energy
Speaker 2: under Obama issued one point six billion and three federal
Speaker 2: loan guarantees for the project, and the Secretary of Energy
Speaker 2: at the time held it as an example of how
Speaker 2: America is becoming a world loser and solar energy no,
Speaker 2: he said, leader, Leader, Yeah, we're leading. We're on the
Speaker 2: cutting edge of shutting everything down and wasting massive amounts
Speaker 2: of money to make sure that our grid isn't powered anymore. Look,
Speaker 2: the case for solar and for photogoll take cells is
Speaker 2: one of local individual off the grid, not to power
Speaker 2: the grid. Solar doesn't work well to power the grid,
Speaker 2: and again the grid has to be up twenty for seven.
Speaker 2: So unless you can put all your solar at the pole,
Speaker 2: at both poles, and you're going to switch it, you know,
Speaker 2: half of the year you got the no night on
Speaker 2: one of the poles, and then you go the other
Speaker 2: half of the year to the other. And let's going
Speaker 2: to do something like that. It's ridiculous to think that
Speaker 2: you're going to power the grid with it. You have
Speaker 2: to get these massive battery backups which are going to
Speaker 2: burn everything down eventually. A symblematic of the profligate government
Speaker 2: spending in unwise bets. I'm poorly conceived, quickly howt dated technologies.
Speaker 2: It's indicative of central planning, folks. I've impau stands as
Speaker 2: a testament to the waste and the inefficiency of government
Speaker 2: subsidized energy schemes. It never lived up to its promises.
Speaker 2: It produced less electricity than expected, while it had to
Speaker 2: rely on natural gas in order to stay operational when
Speaker 2: i've in Pop began operating in twenty fourteen, ranked as
Speaker 2: the world's largest solar plant. Located near the California Nevada border,
Speaker 2: sixty five miles southwest of Vegas, the plant's glowing towers
Speaker 2: are striking are as striking as some of the casinos
Speaker 2: on the strip. The facilities five square miles of desert,
Speaker 2: were covered with some one hundred and seventy three thousand,
Speaker 2: five hundred heliostats adjusted via computer to catch maximum rays.
Speaker 2: The computer controlled mirrors can reflect light from the sun
Speaker 2: at temperatures that can reach one thousand degrees in part
Speaker 2: of the installment. As people have said about nuclear power plants,
Speaker 2: it's one hell of a way to boil water, very
Speaker 2: complicated way to do it as well. And guess what
Speaker 2: happens to the birds that fly in the path of
Speaker 2: that beam.
Speaker 3: You get a roast eagle immediately of one of those
Speaker 3: things through it.
Speaker 2: They said that they think that by their count, I
Speaker 2: think six thousand birds have been killed by this thing.
Speaker 2: It sounds like a bit of a Rube Goldberg contraption
Speaker 2: because it is and it looks like an art installation,
Speaker 2: and it was cutting edge idea for a while. But
Speaker 2: they got the billions of dollars and put it there.
Speaker 2: It simply did not scale up. And that's the issue
Speaker 2: with all solar solar is like it does just not
Speaker 2: scale up. It's not for the grid. It's got great
Speaker 2: use of the case for other small things decentralization.
Speaker 4: I've seen people doing YouTube videos where they make essentially
Speaker 4: a small scale version of this, where they just have
Speaker 4: a whole bunch of mirrors pointed at like a fifty
Speaker 4: gallon drum and have gotten decent results comparable to normal
Speaker 4: solar panels. But I also saw something about this. In
Speaker 4: order to keep the light on these things as the
Speaker 4: sun is moving, all of these have a motor. There's
Speaker 4: thousands of these solar panels that need to be pointed
Speaker 4: at the exact correct position, and they all need to
Speaker 4: be clean all the time, as you see.
Speaker 2: In the desert.
Speaker 4: And yeah, yeah, so.
Speaker 2: Well, I've seen people take like a cylinder that has
Speaker 2: got a parabolic shape in it and they put it
Speaker 2: the focus, they put something so they can boil water
Speaker 2: or something like that, and if they point it at
Speaker 2: the sun in general. I mean, it's not hyper optimized,
Speaker 2: but you know, the thing can rotate as the sun
Speaker 2: rises and sets if you get it pointed in a
Speaker 2: general direction. You know, that parabolic shape, it focuses everything
Speaker 2: on on that tube that is running through there. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's a simpler version of this. This is trying. They
Speaker 2: tried to hyper optimize this thing and scale it up,
Speaker 2: and it just doesn't scale up.
Speaker 3: We're going to go a whole bunch of reflective mirrors
Speaker 3: around somewhere and just melt somebody's car, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you've got an.
Speaker 3: Obnoxious neighbor, Just put you know, a thousand mirrors on
Speaker 3: your land and then point it directly at their garage.
Speaker 2: Yeah. By the way, that was six thousand birds per
Speaker 2: year they killed.
Speaker 3: Do you have someone out there just collecting that. That's
Speaker 3: a lot of bird food, you know, cooked bird going
Speaker 3: to waste.
Speaker 2: I imagine you got to clean up those birds and
Speaker 2: they fall on your precious mirrors. Right, that's a lot
Speaker 2: of the clean up in addition to the dust that's
Speaker 2: out there. Steve Malwoy, Energy and Environmental Legal Institute. I know, Steve,
Speaker 2: I said, no green project relying on taxpayer subsidies has
Speaker 2: ever made any economic or environmental sense. Well, said Steve,
Speaker 2: that's exactly right. It's important that President Trump stopped the
Speaker 2: taxpayer bleeding by ending what he accurately calls the green
Speaker 2: new scam. And of course many of these things were
Speaker 2: brought to you by Governor new Scam in California. That's
Speaker 2: what they should call him. What somebody called him new
Speaker 2: Scam or something. But I think new scam is probably
Speaker 2: the best way to approach you.
Speaker 3: The question is like, are there any new scams anymore?
Speaker 3: You know, what's old is new.
Speaker 2: So this is the thing that got this, this made
Speaker 2: this article pop out to me, was this poster that
Speaker 2: they have. See if you can show this lance the
Speaker 2: attack squirrel, a very mean squirrel, and it says attack squirrel, beware,
Speaker 2: and it shows I'm flying at the people in the picture,
Speaker 2: and then it says this is not a joke. Five
Speaker 2: people have been attacked by a very mean squirrel over
Speaker 2: the past three days, and theablow cannon uh and uh so, yeah,
Speaker 2: this is residents of San Francisco Bay Area City wanting
Speaker 2: them to look out for an aggressive squirrel. I guess
Speaker 2: in San Francisco they don't even have baby guns.
Speaker 4: The beast of the blow cannon canyon.
Speaker 3: I like how they misspelled lacerations.
Speaker 2: Lacerations, Yeah, so they said. The squirrel seemingly came out
Speaker 2: of nowhere and attacked a woman on her leg, clawing
Speaker 2: and biting. It clamped onto my leg. The tail was
Speaker 2: flying up here. I was like, get it off me,
Speaker 2: get it off me. And another person was attacked while
Speaker 2: walking in the same area. The squirrel launched itself the
Speaker 2: ground to her face, wound up on her arm, leaving
Speaker 2: it bloody. She said. Both women went to the emergency room.
Speaker 2: So it acts like it's rabbit, right, except that squirrels
Speaker 2: are not vectors for rabies, So these women are not
Speaker 2: having to get raby shots, are just getting treated for
Speaker 2: all the cuts and lacerations that they had.
Speaker 3: Squirrel squirrels of rodents and rodents have very nasty teeth.
Speaker 3: They get really big and they have extremely fast reflexes.
Speaker 3: As a general rule, you're not catching a squirrel if
Speaker 3: that thing gets on to you, if it doesn't want
Speaker 3: to be caught, you know.
Speaker 2: Well, of course rabbits are rodents as well. It always
Speaker 2: makes me think of Jimmy Carter who was attacked by
Speaker 2: a I think it was a rabbit and had beat
Speaker 2: it off with a paddle or something. I thought that
Speaker 2: was really funny because that came out in nineteen seventy nine.
Speaker 2: It was about five years after Monty Python had done
Speaker 2: The Holy Grail and they had that scene where the
Speaker 2: rabbit was guarding the cave. He be careful. The verer's
Speaker 2: this beast and all the land and they walk up
Speaker 2: and it's just a rabbit and they walk over and
Speaker 2: Shutters writes their head off. You know. Well, Washington is
Speaker 2: forcing speeding offenders to install GPS speed limitters. Eric Peters
Speaker 2: mentioned referred to some of this stuff yesterday because in
Speaker 2: the EU they are requiring it already on every new
Speaker 2: car you have to get a GPS speed limiter. And
Speaker 2: I know because I had radar detectures that were trying
Speaker 2: to help me not speed, and so it would it
Speaker 2: had a GPS thing there. It knew what the speed
Speaker 2: limit was. If I was going to have the speed
Speaker 2: limit it would be, so I had to turn that
Speaker 2: thing off. But it was in Washington. If you're a
Speaker 2: repeat offender, anybody who's caught, Actually you don't have to
Speaker 2: be a repeat offender if you're caught driving twenty miles
Speaker 2: per hour over the limit on the highways or ten
Speaker 2: miles per hour on a small road. So if it's
Speaker 2: a thirty mile an hour road and you're going forty,
Speaker 2: you got to pay to put one of these things
Speaker 2: on your car, like you would pay to put a
Speaker 2: breathalyzer on your car. If you are a repeat offender
Speaker 2: for trunk driving. They don't say though that you have
Speaker 2: to have multiple convictions for this. This could be the
Speaker 2: very first time attracts speed through the GPS electronically caps
Speaker 2: the car's top speed. Offenders have to keep it installed
Speaker 2: for at least one hundred and twenty days or one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty if convicted of reckless driving. Drivers get
Speaker 2: only three temporary bypasses a month before the limitter locks
Speaker 2: them down completely. Refusing to comply means more penalties and
Speaker 2: longer suspensions. While makers push the measure after twenty twenty
Speaker 2: three became the deadly year in Washington's roads in more
Speaker 2: than three decades. Again, just like we're talking about with
Speaker 2: the guns, guns are not necessarily guns are not killing people.
Speaker 2: The people are killing people, right, And speed does not
Speaker 2: kill people either. We see the government putting out these
Speaker 2: signs all the time. Speed kills. Speed kills, No, it doesn't.
Speaker 2: Typically it is an attention. My own personal experience with
Speaker 2: this was I did a when I was in college.
Speaker 2: I did an internship, lived in Tampa and worked in
Speaker 2: Saint Petersburg at a company that was there. And there
Speaker 2: was another person that was also at the same school
Speaker 2: in engineering, and she was also working there. We found
Speaker 2: that out and we said, well, it's just carpool. And
Speaker 2: the problem was is that Kathy had been in a
Speaker 2: severe car accident in her little Volkswagen Bug and she
Speaker 2: was just recovering. She had to take several semesters off
Speaker 2: and she was just recovering. And I went with her
Speaker 2: in this drive from Tampa to Saint Pete a couple
Speaker 2: of times, and then I said that's okay, I'll just
Speaker 2: drive myself. I have never been more afraid in a car,
Speaker 2: and this is one of the slowest drivers I've ever
Speaker 2: been in the car with. She absolutely was spaced out,
Speaker 2: not paying attention, doing all other kinds of things, and
Speaker 2: I could see why she'd gotten in a car accident.
Speaker 2: It is in attention is the thing that kills. Speed
Speaker 2: can make it worse. And fortunately she didn't speed. She
Speaker 2: drove extremely slowly because she really was not somebody who
Speaker 2: should be driving, and you should not be in the
Speaker 2: car with her. Europe Is are requiring these speed limiteds
Speaker 2: on all new cars. Critics see it as a dangerous precedent. Yes,
Speaker 2: taking control of how your car can move, but also
Speaker 2: not just how, but when your car can move and
Speaker 2: where your car can move. The government can control everything
Speaker 2: about you. They are looking for complete control over every
Speaker 2: aspect of our life, and this is a very important
Speaker 2: freedom issue. The automobile is once activated, the limiture does
Speaker 2: not allow flexibility, emergencies, wide open highways, or personal judgment
Speaker 2: no longer matter. Other states are watching very closely, Virginia
Speaker 2: and DC, and of course in Virginia they don't need
Speaker 2: that's the only state that bans radarchitectus. I had a
Speaker 2: rad architector that was confiscated by them once and learned
Speaker 2: my lesson there in virgin In here, freedom of the
Speaker 2: road could soon mean driving under electronic supervision the future
Speaker 2: were speed is no longer a choice. No, we're driving.
Speaker 2: There's no longer a choice. That is where this is
Speaker 2: ultimately headed. Well, let's take a look at the comments
Speaker 2: here and we'll take a break.
Speaker 3: That's right, Dougluve, Thank you very much, Douglave. We do
Speaker 3: appreciate this support. Thank you, says Let's put some gas
Speaker 3: in the gas tank, the gauges at half, don't forget
Speaker 3: hit the like buttons and help spread the word.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 3: David Travis Atliance, Yes, please do with the like buttons
Speaker 3: wherever you're watching or listening, drop alike on the show
Speaker 3: North American House. Hippoh, thank you very much, says love
Speaker 3: it when DK gets into engineering. When I was a
Speaker 3: Toronto bus driver, I was boarding at a university and
Speaker 3: the kid was having a problem with the bike rack.
Speaker 3: Another student helped him figure it out. When he got on,
Speaker 3: I said, I'm guessing you're not in the engineering school.
Speaker 3: He said, no, business.
Speaker 2: Philosophy.
Speaker 3: What does it truly mean to board the bus? Gee?
Speaker 3: Thank you very much, talent. We appreciate it, just says
Speaker 3: a great job with the thumbs up, and then we've
Speaker 3: got ap rumbles seat. World leaders are all in and
Speaker 3: Minion's the WF centralized control. That's why all sovereign nations
Speaker 3: are being brought down in lockstep. Knights of the Storm.
Speaker 3: They say the spent round was inside the rifle. He
Speaker 3: would have been ejected when he removed the bolt, first
Speaker 3: step in disassembly.
Speaker 2: Yeah. It just keeps going, doesn't it. I mean, there
Speaker 2: are so so many things. You know, the bullet didn't
Speaker 2: exit Charlie's neck, and you know all of these things.
Speaker 2: You know, people questioning the angle at which it was
Speaker 2: coming in. I don't know anybody that really believes this.
Speaker 2: We have Cash Battel and Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi
Speaker 2: who claimed that they believe it, but they also claim
Speaker 2: to believe that there's no Epstein docs.
Speaker 3: Yeah. The thirty six not going through his neck, Yeah,
Speaker 3: is what really seals it for me. Everything else. If
Speaker 3: not having a plausible explanation has a possible explanation, there
Speaker 3: are ways you can look at it and say, Okay,
Speaker 3: perhaps his neck is not stopping at thirty odd six.
Speaker 3: It's just not going to do it.
Speaker 2: That's the way you do deductive investigation, Like Sherlock Holmes said,
Speaker 2: you rule out the impossible right until you get to
Speaker 2: what's there. Unfortunately, we can't do an investigation. So I'm
Speaker 2: going to focus on how these people are using this
Speaker 2: event to reject everything that Charlie Kirk stood for and
Speaker 2: they want to push for censorship and all the rest
Speaker 2: of the stuff. We've got to make sure we're not
Speaker 2: going to solve this. And you know, it is important
Speaker 2: to understand the government lied to you, and it is
Speaker 2: important to say, hell, this couldn't have happened, and that
Speaker 2: couldn't have happened, and that couldn't have happened. But when
Speaker 2: you look at the way that they're using it, that
Speaker 2: was the thing about nine to eleven. We knew that
Speaker 2: didn't know still don't know how they did that, but
Speaker 2: we know did not happen, and that is the official story,
Speaker 2: and we know what they used it for. It was
Speaker 2: where they kicked off the surveillance and police state. And
Speaker 2: that's what we're going to be talking about when we
Speaker 2: come back. We're going to talk about the mark of
Speaker 2: the Beast and how the digital idea is now being
Speaker 2: mandated all over the place. Uecase coming up with that,
Speaker 2: and we'll talk about Peter Teel and his obsession and
Speaker 2: inversion of what he thinks the Antichrists as well. But
Speaker 2: we got more comments there before we take a break.
Speaker 3: Yeah, revolting villager. Bill Clinton's blue dress picture needs to
Speaker 3: be hung there. I'm assuming that's the presidential walk of shame,
Speaker 3: Wall of shame.
Speaker 2: No, we should do a walk of shame for all
Speaker 2: the people that were involved with Jeffrey Epstein, the people
Speaker 2: who defended him in court, the people who didn't prosecute
Speaker 2: him in court, the people who hung out with him
Speaker 2: for fifteen years. They all need to be there.
Speaker 3: Burger says, I do not care who you are. That
Speaker 3: is funny. I'm assuming talking about the squirrel, because everything
Speaker 3: else you've talked about today has been fairly serious.
Speaker 4: I think it was about the auto pin pick.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, that is funny.
Speaker 3: Yeah, m E Studios. I've been saying for months that
Speaker 3: we're witnessing the birth of the Ministry of truth. The
Speaker 3: way the state keeps shamelessly putting out lies and standing
Speaker 3: behind them, that's mental conditioning. Real Octo Spook used to
Speaker 3: find a criminal like comy, and he was quickly charged, rested,
Speaker 3: and imprisoned. Now we are talked to death on all
Speaker 3: criminals and their crimes. Will they run free? Tunnel Lord
Speaker 3: one three three seven. This Epstein files up is so fake?
Speaker 3: Why would the government keep evidence of their crimes? That's
Speaker 3: what I've been saying papers, Yeah, yeah, exactly, That's what
Speaker 3: I've been saying. I mentioned this before, but if I
Speaker 3: was in charge of the new CIA recruits every year,
Speaker 3: I just have them add more details into the JFK
Speaker 3: files every single year. All right, your CIA turn. Your
Speaker 3: job is to make up something kind of ridiculous, but
Speaker 3: not too ridiculous. So if this ever gets leaked, they're
Speaker 3: not gonna know. Like it just needs to be large,
Speaker 3: it doesn't need to be real. Yeah, oh so, bogus Senator,
Speaker 3: Church of the Church Commission was black mailed.
Speaker 2: Well whatever happened with that, you know, when they did pass.
Speaker 2: But people don't realize is that the Church Commission, what
Speaker 2: we always see is the heart attack gun that they
Speaker 2: hold up and they pass around and Goldwater looks down
Speaker 2: the sites of it and everything. But the reality is
Speaker 2: that that was convened because from the very beginning, the
Speaker 2: CIA and the NSA from the beginning of their creation
Speaker 2: right after World War Two by Harry Truman, who created
Speaker 2: both of those abominations. From the very beginning, they were
Speaker 2: spying on Americans illegally without search warrants, and that's why
Speaker 2: they came up with the PISA Court. That was the
Speaker 2: PISA came as the result of that. It wasn't initially
Speaker 2: about the assassinations. They used it to draw attention away
Speaker 2: from the real issue a spying on the American people illegally.
Speaker 2: But they didn't have any law that said you can't
Speaker 2: assassinate people. Trump does it and he brags about it
Speaker 2: as being a great thing they came up. The end
Speaker 2: result of this thing was to prohibit them from spying
Speaker 2: on people, but they use that FISA structure to spy
Speaker 2: on people and to give them legal cover when they
Speaker 2: did it, so they never stopped. They continued doing it.
Speaker 2: It just gave them legal structure to do.
Speaker 3: Revolting Villager, I never liked the US government, but they
Speaker 3: used to stay out of my life and they were
Speaker 3: easy to ignore. Now they are even in my breakfast.
Speaker 3: Even the price of eggs is political. I'm tired of it.
Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely, Yeah. We used to say that used to
Speaker 2: be a talking point. We said in the early nineties
Speaker 2: that most of the people and in Switzerland didn't know
Speaker 2: who the Present was because he wasn't in their face
Speaker 2: all the time and in their life all the time.
Speaker 2: And now everybody knows everything about Donald Trump because every
Speaker 2: day he's coming up with some outrageous thing that is
Speaker 2: going to create chaos and destruction in our country and
Speaker 2: around the world, because that's what he is there for.
Speaker 2: So again we're going to take a quick break and
Speaker 2: when we come back, we're going to take a look
Speaker 2: at the mark of the Beast according to Peter Thiel,
Speaker 2: and we're going to take a look at the actual
Speaker 2: mark that is are being rapidly deployed in the UK
Speaker 2: and elsewhere. We'll be right.
Speaker 1: Back defending the American dream. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show. If you like the.
Speaker 6: Eagles, that doesn't Hotway, the cars and Heuey Lewis and
Speaker 6: the news they say the hard Roads, you'll love the
Speaker 6: classic It's channel at APS Radio, download our app or
Speaker 6: listen now at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. We've got some comments. First, I do
Speaker 3: want to remind you that we're getting close to the
Speaker 3: end of the month and we're still about halfway on
Speaker 3: the gas gage.
Speaker 2: It's a it's a little bit above that now, but
Speaker 2: it's still about half.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And all the ways you can support the show
Speaker 3: can be found on David Knight dot News. You can
Speaker 3: go there. There's the peobox, which is Peobox, David Knight,
Speaker 3: Peelbox nine nine four, Kodak Tennessee three seven seven six
Speaker 3: four there, subscribe Star dot com, forward slash the David
Speaker 3: Knight Show. There's a lot of different tiers there, and
Speaker 3: it's a good way to support us. It's an easy
Speaker 3: fire and forget sort of thing, so if you want
Speaker 3: to make a monthly contribution, it really does make that easy.
Speaker 2: And sometimes though, people forget and their credit card expires
Speaker 2: and then it stops firing and they don't get any notification.
Speaker 2: The sub sub subscribe Star doesn't give you a notification
Speaker 2: the car is not working.
Speaker 3: But there's also cash app zell and a bitcoin address.
Speaker 3: If there's some extremely wealthy person out there that wants
Speaker 3: to just drop a few bitcoin on us, you know,
Speaker 3: we wouldn't you know, like nine.
Speaker 2: Million years right, just ipened to me.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's funny how that seems to happen. But there's
Speaker 3: those options. You can also go to our sponsors our supporters,
Speaker 3: which are trends Journal dot com being put in promo
Speaker 3: codnite for ten percent off. And of course, Gerald Silente's
Speaker 3: Occupy Peace Rally is happening tomorrow in Kingston, New York.
Speaker 3: It's a great time. Jerald Saline is very very passionate
Speaker 3: about his work. It's a monumental effort, and the people
Speaker 3: up there do not really like him because.
Speaker 2: The people that will be there at the rally are
Speaker 2: kindred spirits.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a great place to go and meet like
Speaker 3: minded individuals. It's where we got to actually meet Guard
Speaker 3: in person. It was a lot of fun. It was
Speaker 3: great to actually get to meet Guard. They do have
Speaker 3: this weird painting on the wall though. That was kind
Speaker 3: of creepy that this giant statue that because you know
Speaker 3: it's a liberal area. Yeah, and some kind of Hindu
Speaker 3: goddess or something.
Speaker 2: It was like the goddess Athena that you know, like
Speaker 2: two dozen breasts or something on her, but it was this.
Speaker 2: We were we were really exhausted at the end of
Speaker 2: the thing, and we sat down and had Travis, go
Speaker 2: get the van and pull around. And so Karen and
Speaker 2: I is sitting on the bench and we look up
Speaker 2: and just right across the street, towering over us, there's
Speaker 2: this several story pagan painting that was really kind of
Speaker 2: like whoa, because it was it was late night and
Speaker 2: and there was nobody else on the street, and it
Speaker 2: was ultra creepy. So if you want to see that thing,
Speaker 2: that's a tourist attraction too. They may have painted over
Speaker 2: it by now. Hopefully it was done as part of Obamacare.
Speaker 2: Believe it or not, you know it was in honor
Speaker 2: of Obamacare. We're gonna put Athena and she's rising up
Speaker 2: out of the city as like, are we.
Speaker 3: Sure it wasn't a god or goddess of death considering
Speaker 3: it's Obamacare, could be And of course there is David
Speaker 3: Knight dot gold. If you want to start accumulating gold
Speaker 3: or silver, David Night dot gold is a great way
Speaker 3: to do that. Tony Arburn has set that up. There's
Speaker 3: RNC store dot com where with promo code Night you
Speaker 3: get ten percent off their products. They might be able
Speaker 3: to help you with some of your health struggles. It's
Speaker 3: a good way to hopefully avoid the medical industrial complex
Speaker 3: and avoid having to get trapped inside it. And there's
Speaker 3: Homestead Products dot Chop, where again with promo code night
Speaker 3: you get ten percent off and the products are high quality,
Speaker 3: they're made in America.
Speaker 2: They are like great stuff, great stuff.
Speaker 3: I've been using that hot sauce on basically everything that
Speaker 3: I can put it on. So that's why the bottles
Speaker 3: not in the studio anymore. I have commandeered it, I've
Speaker 3: requisitioned it. It's not coming back except once the bottle's empty.
Speaker 3: So if you like hot sauce, their medium hot sauce
Speaker 3: is very very good. It's delicious. I really like hot sauce,
Speaker 3: and that has a great flavor. It's not super spicy,
Speaker 3: but it has a great flavor. If you like vinegar
Speaker 3: based hot sauces, I fully recommend.
Speaker 2: They got some great freeze dried organic foods over there
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 3: Yes, freeze dried beef. There's egg powder, all kinds of
Speaker 3: different things that would be very helpful to you. And
Speaker 3: there's things like soaps and just high quality, made in
Speaker 3: America products and made by people who love this country
Speaker 3: and love freedom. So how can you get better than that?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I love this show too.
Speaker 3: I also saw a comment from I Handy in chat.
Speaker 3: He said, David, have you recovered enough to enough find
Speaker 3: motor skills to start making music again.
Speaker 2: Yes, I can't play with my left hand, but I'm
Speaker 2: working on it, still working on it, And a lot
Speaker 2: of the stuff that I do is editing and mixing
Speaker 2: the sound levels and of thing. So there's a couple
Speaker 2: of songs that I've been working on and I've actually
Speaker 2: been working on trying to finish. I've got like four
Speaker 2: songs I haven't quite finished yet. I'm trying to finish them.
Speaker 2: And I got some songs that I wrote lyrics to
Speaker 2: that for years and years ago, and so that was
Speaker 2: always an issue, how do I how do we get
Speaker 2: the lyrics in there? Who do we get to sing?
Speaker 2: And it turns out although the space where people do
Speaker 2: mini instrument creation. Of course, this was always something that
Speaker 2: has been done for quite some time. Well, the first
Speaker 2: people to do it for TV was I think the
Speaker 2: guy who did the soundtrack for twenty four. He did
Speaker 2: everything himself. He composed it and used mini instruments and
Speaker 2: things like that for the show. But a lot of
Speaker 2: people are doing it for games and for TV shows.
Speaker 2: They were using it. Some people just did it for
Speaker 2: their own compositions or to show the director of what
Speaker 2: it was going to sound like. If he liked it,
Speaker 2: then they would get an orchestra to do the final
Speaker 2: thing if it's a big budget movie or something. And
Speaker 2: that has been going on now for about twenty years
Speaker 2: and it got to be quite good. It's still a
Speaker 2: lot of work to try to get the different nuances
Speaker 2: of an instrument because they're constantly changing the way they
Speaker 2: strike the note, for example. But now with the advent
Speaker 2: of AI, I guess it's because as souno, everybody can
Speaker 2: just go in and say, you know, give me this
Speaker 2: type of song and you know, this style and the sentimentation,
Speaker 2: and it just does everything for them. And so it's
Speaker 2: I guess it's really kind of amazing how quickly this
Speaker 2: all just disappeared. I mean, in the last six months,
Speaker 2: it's just disappeared. People who had big production libraries that
Speaker 2: they've been working on for a year all of a
Speaker 2: sudden just went, you know, just just went dark, and
Speaker 2: there's no more news about it. So it's kind of
Speaker 2: an instant antique form of making music anymore. But I
Speaker 2: still like it, and one thing that has come out
Speaker 2: that's good of AI is that always in the past,
Speaker 2: people go in and they would make a library of
Speaker 2: they get into a really good sound auditorium or something
Speaker 2: like that stage and or it might be a cathedral,
Speaker 2: and they would record a huge choir, right, and so
Speaker 2: that'd be one of things that brag on. This is
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty person choir, and that has a
Speaker 2: very unique sound when you get that many people singing.
Speaker 2: But the problem was is that they were all saying
Speaker 2: or humming or whatever, and so you couldn't get them
Speaker 2: to actually say anything. And now with AI, they don't
Speaker 2: have the big choirs like that yet, but they do
Speaker 2: have AI that you can actually program and find detuned
Speaker 2: the detail, which is very different than what you get
Speaker 2: if you do something for video. If you take an
Speaker 2: image and turn it into video, it's kind of random
Speaker 2: what you're going to get hit or miss. You can't
Speaker 2: really control these things very well. They don't take direction
Speaker 2: very well. That's getting better, but it's still not quite there.
Speaker 2: Some of them you can now get more continuity and
Speaker 2: you can add items to it. I haven't played around
Speaker 2: with it enough to know if what the current state
Speaker 2: of the art is with that, but that's been a
Speaker 2: big problem, and so you'd have to do pass after
Speaker 2: pass after pass them maybe you get something that was
Speaker 2: kind of what you wanted that you could use. But
Speaker 2: with the audio of the singing, you can play the
Speaker 2: notes that you want and then you can type in
Speaker 2: the lyrics that you want, and then it will make
Speaker 2: it first pass with some of the voices that are
Speaker 2: in its library, and if that isn't what you want,
Speaker 2: you can go in and just how it sings on
Speaker 2: a note by note basis. You can make it very soft,
Speaker 2: or you can make it belt it out, or you
Speaker 2: can add vibrato or take vibroado out, so you can
Speaker 2: fine tune it on a note by note basis. And
Speaker 2: so that's something I've been playing around with and hope
Speaker 2: to be able to use that soon. I'll play I'll
Speaker 2: bring the song in that I've done and play for
Speaker 2: you sometime. Yeah, maybe a Christmas who knows, because the
Speaker 2: song is about John. First one I got finished was
Speaker 2: a song that I did be twenty years ago this
Speaker 2: Thanksgiving about John. One in the beginning was the orders
Speaker 2: with God and the word was God, and so I thought,
Speaker 2: you know, for us Christmas is about the incarnation, so
Speaker 2: I'd be releasing that maybe Christmas time.
Speaker 3: I am so tired right now. When you said John,
Speaker 3: for second, my brain autophil John Wilkes Booth, It's like,
Speaker 3: I didn't know you made a song about the assassination
Speaker 3: of Lincoln.
Speaker 2: No, I didn't.
Speaker 3: I was like, how did I miss that?
Speaker 2: Well, I guess that would get me banned from the country,
Speaker 2: get me banned from social media if I did that.
Speaker 2: I can't think of any things that I would say
Speaker 2: about it that we get me banned. Yeah, that's so.
Speaker 3: Fidget guy, who've got comments? Fidget Guy says solar panels
Speaker 3: at home will be the future with sodium ion batteries
Speaker 3: to store the power.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, if you want to prep that's a
Speaker 2: really good use for it. I'm not anti solar. I'm
Speaker 2: anti solar powering the grid. I'm anti grid more than anything,
Speaker 2: which means that I'm pro solar when it is off
Speaker 2: the grid. Using an off the grid scenario end up
Speaker 2: with some gridlock.
Speaker 3: If we on Burger, the solar farms become almost useless
Speaker 3: here in the winter. There's also the fact that the
Speaker 3: planet is dark half the time. You know, there's this
Speaker 3: thing called night Yeah, that's yeah.
Speaker 4: It's stuff like that, which is what makes it good
Speaker 4: for personal use, but not so much for the grid.
Speaker 4: It's you know, a person can clean the snow or
Speaker 4: whatever off of their solar panels in the winter. If
Speaker 4: it's a institution with thousands of them, that becomes a
Speaker 4: much harder thing to do. Like the failed solar collector stuff.
Speaker 4: If a normal solar panels motor that tracks the sun breaks,
Speaker 4: it loses a few percentage of efficiency that if it broke,
Speaker 4: it's no longer pointed at the tower and you lose
Speaker 4: all the efficiency of that panel. It's the amount of
Speaker 4: maintenance needed for these things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, if you are in a northern climate and there's
Speaker 2: the sun is not as bright and direct and snow
Speaker 2: is going to be that your better solution might be
Speaker 2: a small windmill or something like that. But again, I
Speaker 2: don't like windmills for the entire grid. It makes no
Speaker 2: sense whatsoever.
Speaker 3: You also, do they have to worry about somebody on
Speaker 3: a donkey showing up at your home and trying.
Speaker 2: To jack then.
Speaker 3: Don't frag me. Bro Solar pans panels are fragile due
Speaker 3: to manufacturing errors and are destroyed by thousands and hailstorms. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's one of the issues with Texas is Texas quite
Speaker 3: frequently has hailstorms, more frequently than I would have ever
Speaker 3: thought until we lived there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and they're pretty intense.
Speaker 3: Patty Wax watched the British show Yes Minister to see
Speaker 3: how there is nothing new under the sun. Old show
Speaker 3: you can catch on tub or one of the free sites. Yes,
Speaker 3: Yes Minister is an excellent.
Speaker 2: We loved that. Yeah, very very funny, very very funny.
Speaker 2: It shows how this politician is absolutely controlled by his
Speaker 2: bureaucratic assistance.
Speaker 3: And he's been there for you know, decades at this point,
Speaker 3: served under every prime minister, and he's the one that
Speaker 3: ends up getting his agenda across every time.
Speaker 2: If I remember correct that he was the guy that
Speaker 2: had played King George and the Madness of King George,
Speaker 2: and he was the top bureaucrat that's controlling the Prime
Speaker 2: minister in this sparticular way. So it was a real
Speaker 2: switch for him.
Speaker 3: I guess Revolting Villager, they need to try pyramids. The
Speaker 3: cube shape is probably wrong.
Speaker 4: About the solar panel collectors that were glowing in the sun.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Americaca, you get special energy anyway. Exactly.
Speaker 3: The squirrels out in California have gone carnivore. They're eating
Speaker 3: rats and all kinds of things. California just drives everyone
Speaker 3: that lives there long enough crazy.
Speaker 2: It's even the squirrels go squirrely.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Marvin Gardens Carter attacked by a rabbit. That was
Speaker 3: hilarious at the time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, especially because what was I saw in my mind
Speaker 2: was that Monty Python's got.
Speaker 3: The fidget. Guy responding you do not obey says all
Speaker 3: unclean animals should make you nervous. They're all vectors for
Speaker 3: deadly bacteria, viruses, and parasites. Yeah, that's That's one of
Speaker 3: the main reasons is you don't want to pick up
Speaker 3: wild animals. Their mouths aren't clean, and even if they
Speaker 3: don't have rabies, a bite can lead to serious infection.
Speaker 3: Even a dog bite is a very serious problem that
Speaker 3: can lead to major issues. You have to be very careful.
Speaker 3: And it's a constant thorn in my side because every
Speaker 3: time I see a possum, I want to go pick
Speaker 3: it up. It's like, oh, come here, buddy, we could
Speaker 3: be friends. Original babe. How will the city ever make
Speaker 3: any money without speeding that's the question. What will the
Speaker 3: police be doing. They'll have to find other things to
Speaker 3: harash you for.
Speaker 4: They're going to have to find another way to make
Speaker 4: revenue off of it's people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm reading that next comment there from do Not Obey,
Speaker 2: Do not Obey.
Speaker 3: Squirrels though always hiding and plotting, they're shifty. They're shifty.
Speaker 3: My dad's always been in the opinion that squirrels are
Speaker 3: just rats with a better pr jobs.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. You have a bushy tail helps them
Speaker 2: to be fair.
Speaker 3: I like rats and squirrels. I just like in general,
Speaker 3: almost every animal.
Speaker 2: I wonder what the German word for a squirrel is,
Speaker 2: you know, for a bat, they call them a flying
Speaker 2: mouseuse yeah, fleetermouse, right, So what they call the the
Speaker 2: tail rat or something like that, the butchery rat.
Speaker 3: Knowing Germans, it's got to be something like that. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they're very literal when it comes to their words. Original Babe.
Speaker 3: They used to say, slow drivers cause more accidents.
Speaker 2: Certainly the case experience in high school and college, she
Speaker 2: was the one. She admitted that it was all her
Speaker 2: fault to that accident that nearly killed her. And again,
Speaker 2: saws driver. I've ever been with the most dangerous driver
Speaker 2: I've ever.
Speaker 3: Been with catastrophe. All these accessories in cars or prototypes
Speaker 3: for self driving controlled cars, they're moving that way for everything.
Speaker 2: That's why government controlled cars. Yeah, we used to call
Speaker 2: it a governor when they would put something on to
Speaker 2: control the speed. When we were in Florida, we go
Speaker 2: to Daytona Beach when they would still allow you to
Speaker 2: drive things on the beach. They don't allow that anymore.
Speaker 2: No freedom to do anything, no, no. But you know,
Speaker 2: even as a young teenager, I could get a motorcycle
Speaker 2: that had a governor on it and it wouldn't go
Speaker 2: more than thirty miles an hour because of the governor.
Speaker 2: Now you've really got the government top of your motor
Speaker 2: with electronics. It's just crazy.
Speaker 3: Don't frag me.
Speaker 2: Bro.
Speaker 3: In Texas, we have operations slow down as a pretext,
Speaker 3: issue tickets if you're more than five miles over the limit,
Speaker 3: issuing more than normal tickets for revenue collection and securing
Speaker 3: FED funding.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, if you go to Eric Peters site,
Speaker 2: he's got a sponsor there, Cincinnati Microwave that has the
Speaker 2: as radarchitect or of Valentine one or maybe it's a
Speaker 2: two now or something like that. And that's a really
Speaker 2: good solution to operations slow down, which.
Speaker 3: You know, you should never ever use those to avoid
Speaker 3: cops while getting to drive at a speed that you
Speaker 3: feel comfortable at. You shouldn't do that.
Speaker 2: Never, of course. And if you have an Android phone,
Speaker 2: they don't have the app for the iOS. But there's
Speaker 2: a guy that's in North Carolina and he goes by
Speaker 2: John Boy, I think it's what it is, But he's
Speaker 2: got a he's got an app that even hooks up
Speaker 2: to the older escorts and and and it's a great
Speaker 2: app because it remembers where things are. It's got some
Speaker 2: functions that the older radar architectures didn't have. He put
Speaker 2: it inside of the app. Now a lot of that
Speaker 2: stuff is internalized in some of the radarchitectures as well.
Speaker 2: But that's a great app, you know. And yeah, people
Speaker 2: can even call in and warn others where the cops
Speaker 2: are waiting for people. There's a speed trip made the
Speaker 2: science out of it when I was in.
Speaker 3: Texas, a network of informants. Yeah, that's right, Guard Goldsmith
Speaker 3: And of course you can find Guard at Liberty Conspiracy
Speaker 3: on Rumble and my x x I X I can
Speaker 3: remember the name. I want to say to.
Speaker 2: It one letter.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you can find him there and on substack at
Speaker 3: guard Goldsmith. Remember interesting test Reason did on the California
Speaker 3: Highway using multiple cars to all take each lane and
Speaker 3: drive it coused so much vexation among other drivers they
Speaker 3: ended it early.
Speaker 2: I don't remember that. I do know that in Germany
Speaker 2: and the Autubaht they will give you a ticket if
Speaker 2: you're going slow in the fast lane. And because I understand,
Speaker 2: you know, there they put a lot more emphasis on
Speaker 2: how you should drive rather than just making sure you
Speaker 2: go through a tedious expensive process or whatever at the
Speaker 2: Department of Vehicles. I guess it's not that expensive except
Speaker 2: in time. But yeah, they will give you a ticket
Speaker 2: if you're in the fast lane and you don't get
Speaker 2: over and let somebody pass. It's not for just hanging
Speaker 2: out in the left lane, so he called him left
Speaker 2: lane bandits here.
Speaker 3: Though, it's for people with places to be. Through twenty
Speaker 3: twenty nine, the limitters have been in every vehicle sold
Speaker 3: since Cash for Clunkers. The device only signifies the vehicle
Speaker 3: through a rect link, putting AI in charge versus a human.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm, don't frag me, bro. Every major assassination US
Speaker 3: history was called a lone gunman only over time with
Speaker 3: the conspiracy to be exposed by.
Speaker 2: The way, going back to them tracking, how do you
Speaker 2: think they get all of the traffic reports showing that
Speaker 2: traffic has stopped on your map and everything. It's because
Speaker 2: they're compiling that used to be that it was coming
Speaker 2: from the truckers and some other things and some other
Speaker 2: vehicles that were there. But now with everybody having a phone,
Speaker 2: they're collecting that information all the time. That's how they
Speaker 2: can generate the traffic reports in real time. But it's
Speaker 2: just getting worse all the.
Speaker 3: Time, nannying. Yeah, the constant looking over your shoulder, bin
Speaker 3: Laden Bernanki won the same people amongst the government and
Speaker 3: media elite who were shocked that Biden had cognitive problems
Speaker 3: were shocked when their best buddy Epstein was found guilty
Speaker 3: of his crime. How could this happen? Defy Tyrant seventy
Speaker 3: and seventy six Vietnam. He activates eighty five million bank
Speaker 3: accounts that are people refusing digital ID verification.
Speaker 2: Yes program, Yes, we talked about that this week.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I believe it was yesterday.
Speaker 2: They talked about it with Tony but I talked about
Speaker 2: it earlier in the week as well. Yeah, there's your
Speaker 2: domino theory, folks, and here's the next domino to fall.
Speaker 2: Every adult in the UK will soon be required to
Speaker 2: have a digital brit Card ID. Oh it's great and
Speaker 2: you know, remember I've played it many times. I won't
Speaker 2: play it again right now. But the Ukraine twenty thirty
Speaker 2: video where they've got this happy person saying, now we
Speaker 2: got an app and we've got digital ID and you
Speaker 2: can use this when you go to the Department of
Speaker 2: Motor Vehicles or when you pay your taxes over here
Speaker 2: where you fill out this license form or this or that,
Speaker 2: and it's all. You know, we're going to expedite your
Speaker 2: dealing with the government, or we're going to make it
Speaker 2: impossible for you to deal with the government. They said, well,
Speaker 2: this is Prime Minister hair Starmer. I think you should
Speaker 2: have a German name. There's Starmer. Yeah, it's like Haircross.
Speaker 2: Claus is set to announce that all working adults in
Speaker 2: the UK will be required to have government issued digital ID.
Speaker 2: What about the people on welfare? You know, all citizens
Speaker 2: have to have it, but maybe not the other people
Speaker 2: who are coming in and getting welfare. I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean when you look at how they rolled this
Speaker 2: thing out in India with Bill Gates, he used it
Speaker 2: for the poorest people. He used it for the people
Speaker 2: who were on welfare, who were on you know, getting
Speaker 2: government healthcare and that type of thing. You're not going
Speaker 2: to get that unless you take the ID.
Speaker 3: I'm surprised he hasn't set up his own private police
Speaker 3: force and only answers to them, you know, the stormtroopers.
Speaker 2: Stormtroopers. Yeah, yeah, So this is very much like you
Speaker 2: don't think this is going to happen here, folks, It's
Speaker 2: already happened here. And where did it come from? Did
Speaker 2: it come from the Democrats? No, it came from the Republicans.
Speaker 2: It came from Ron DeSantis in Florida and the far
Speaker 2: to Republicans, the conservative fard Republicans. They were the first ones,
Speaker 2: not the first ones, but they made a big issue
Speaker 2: of it. When DeSantis was running, he was boasting about
Speaker 2: how he's going to fix illegal aliens coming here to
Speaker 2: take your jobs, using everify and making it now mandatory.
Speaker 2: It's been around for a long time, you know, I've
Speaker 2: had these things that have been here in America, like
Speaker 2: real id and everify. Now is the time that the
Speaker 2: American government, which has left these things out say oh, okay,
Speaker 2: you don't have to have it, we just have it here.
Speaker 2: Now they're declaring it to be mandatory. And the same
Speaker 2: thing is happening in the UK. And why are they
Speaker 2: doing this and why do you have most of the
Speaker 2: people in support of it. Well, because they created a
Speaker 2: problem with open borders here in the US, just like
Speaker 2: in the UK. And in the UK this is being
Speaker 2: perceived by the people who should oppose. It's being perceived
Speaker 2: as a solution to the government created problem of open borders.
Speaker 2: New plans which Starmar will unveil today are hoped to
Speaker 2: help tackle levels of illegal immigration, make it easier to
Speaker 2: identify if a person can live and work in the UK,
Speaker 2: whether a citizen or those on visas. The so called
Speaker 2: brit Card would be shown when starting a new job,
Speaker 2: when it'd be checked in large database of people entitled
Speaker 2: to work in the UK. This is precisely the same
Speaker 2: thing this rabid socialist globalist Hair Starmer is doing exactly
Speaker 2: the same thing in the UK the Conservative Republicans have
Speaker 2: done here. If you don't see that this is a
Speaker 2: globalist agenda and if you don't see who's on the
Speaker 2: globalist team from this, yeah, we know they're all doing
Speaker 2: the same thing. This is the pandemic stuff all over again.
Speaker 2: And of course when the pandemic stuff was out there,
Speaker 2: you had Tony Blair saying, you know, the vaccine ID
Speaker 2: was where they were moving the overturn window in people's
Speaker 2: minds about how this is going to be necessary.
Speaker 7: Where it's going to be very hard for people to
Speaker 7: do a lot of normal life unless they can prove
Speaker 7: their vaccination status. I think you'll find a situation where
Speaker 7: countries say to you, you're not coming in here unless
Speaker 7: we see whether you've either been vaccinated, you've had the
Speaker 7: disease and have got antibodies, or you've had a recent
Speaker 7: high quality test. People have got to understand vaccination is
Speaker 7: going to be in the end. You'll root to liberty.
Speaker 7: Vaccination is going to be in the end, your root
Speaker 7: to liberty. Vaccination is going to be in the end,
Speaker 7: You'll root to liberty. So you're hearing it's a constraint
Speaker 7: on your liberty, You've got to go and get vaccinated.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, and just fill in the blank. It's going
Speaker 2: to be something else did you comply with our speech
Speaker 2: rules about this and that you know they're going to
Speaker 2: have a long list of things. Well, the Home Secretary
Speaker 2: there somebody by the name of Shamana Ma Mood. That's
Speaker 2: a good British name, Celtic I think.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, Mamod family has been a staple of England
Speaker 3: for you know, century.
Speaker 2: Long, Scottish family. I think that a system of digital
Speaker 2: ID can also help with illegal working and the enforcement
Speaker 2: of other laws as well. Yeah, see, this is a
Speaker 2: type of thing. My long term personal political view has
Speaker 2: always been in favor of ID cards, said my mood. Well,
Speaker 2: same as the GOP conservative Republicans in Florida pushing this
Speaker 2: same stuff. So initial mockups show the document would show
Speaker 2: whether the holder has the right to work or the
Speaker 2: right to rent. Here we go. This is very much
Speaker 2: Soviet style, right, you don't do what the government likes,
Speaker 2: said Sosie and Insindia. When you talked about do not
Speaker 2: live by life, he says, yes, we understand. They can
Speaker 2: take away your job, they can kick you out of
Speaker 2: your home, but he must not be afraid. And even
Speaker 2: if to keep your job and to keep your home
Speaker 2: you lie. Just don't ever believe it. Don't ever believe
Speaker 2: those lies. And that's the issue with the MAGA people
Speaker 2: is that they are engaging in double think in order
Speaker 2: to stay into this club they think they belong in.
Speaker 2: But anyway, that's nothing new. This is Soviet style, folks.
Speaker 2: You're not going to be able to work or rent
Speaker 2: unless the government approves of you, whether you're either a
Speaker 2: citizen or a foreign national. And it appears a digital
Speaker 2: ID will be mandatory for any working adult in the UK.
Speaker 2: Their driver's license would also be on the app. Again,
Speaker 2: this is Ukraine twenty thirty. Okay, the war's over, we won,
Speaker 2: and now we've got this ID that follows us everywhere.
Speaker 2: And that's what you're fighting for. You're fighting so that
Speaker 2: you can be under the kind of tyranny that they
Speaker 2: used China as a beta test site for, with hopes
Speaker 2: that the app could be used to order a passport,
Speaker 2: to access health services, or to display your National insurance number.
Speaker 2: So and they say it could also help a visa overstayers.
Speaker 2: In other words, they're throwing this out after they've done
Speaker 2: everything to advantage people who come to the UK, especially
Speaker 2: those who come illegally. We're going to have a two
Speaker 2: tier system, that's going to put them in the top tier.
Speaker 2: You're on the bottom. And now they say the people
Speaker 2: on the bottom that they have made second class, the
Speaker 2: citizens that they've made second class. Well, this is going
Speaker 2: to be your ticket to getting out of this goolog
Speaker 2: that we put you into. Britain right now is the
Speaker 2: only country in Europe without an ID card, and those
Speaker 2: in the EU that are able to travel around the
Speaker 2: block with one instead of a passport. I don't know
Speaker 2: though that they have to have an ID card in
Speaker 2: order to get a job in the EU. I don't
Speaker 2: know about that. But the countries that have a digital
Speaker 2: idea already, the EU, China, Costa Rica, Singapore, South Korea, UAE, Canada,
Speaker 2: I don't know. We have some Canadian listeners here. I mean,
Speaker 2: do you have to have an ID card in Canada
Speaker 2: to get a job? Japan and India? Of course India.
Speaker 2: Tony Blair that you just saw that attempted to introduce
Speaker 2: compulsory ID cards into thousand and six after the seven
Speaker 2: to seven bombings, only for it to be scrapped. Labored
Speaker 2: Together estimates that it will cost four hundred million pounds
Speaker 2: to build the EID system and ten million pounds to
Speaker 2: run the free to use phone app.
Speaker 4: Crazy how Tony Blair saw this, the problems of the
Speaker 4: seven to seven bombing, COVID and illegal immigration and he
Speaker 4: has this solution ready to go for all of these things.
Speaker 4: It'll fix all these problems instantly.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny how they had the solution from the
Speaker 2: pandemic back in two months before nine to eleven. And
Speaker 2: those seven seven bombings were very, very suspicious, just like
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. They had a drill that was happening
Speaker 2: at exactly the same time, exactly the same place, for
Speaker 2: exactly the same scenario. What are the chances of that
Speaker 2: happening And so a lot of people were confused and
Speaker 2: they thought it was part of the drill, just like
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. Privacy groups have long criticized the idea
Speaker 2: of Big Brother Watch in the UK, telling them that
Speaker 2: the mandatory digital ID cards are dystopian. Of course, the
Speaker 2: evidence from countries with established digital ID systems show that
Speaker 2: it won't reduce irregular migration. If they've got it all
Speaker 2: in all the countries in the EU, then obviously it
Speaker 2: does not address immigration. But they will tell you that
Speaker 2: remember that Americans, when the Republicans come to you trying
Speaker 2: to sell this stuff. It's not going to stop illegal immigration.
Speaker 4: So I mean, do you hear that they have people
Speaker 4: on the shores with scanners to scan the ID cards
Speaker 4: of the immigrants on the boats as they pull up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, that's all a lie. Offline.
Speaker 2: Physical IDs must not be lost to time, is what
Speaker 2: they're saying in this article from the UK. In other words,
Speaker 2: what they're saying is just like physical cash, we've got
Speaker 2: to keep that. We've got to keep the physical ID card,
Speaker 2: which gives you some modicum of privacy, perhaps as well
Speaker 2: as physical cash. Any system should be designed with the
Speaker 2: purpose of helping people to assess vital services like healthcare,
Speaker 2: providing our identity more easily, not by creating barriers or
Speaker 2: shutting people out. I don't see a use case for
Speaker 2: anybody having any ID for anything except for voting. If
Speaker 2: you want to participate in this charade, then go get
Speaker 2: an ID. If they aren't going to check voter IDs
Speaker 2: and they want to check your ID to do everything else,
Speaker 2: what does that tell you? So fifty four percent of
Speaker 2: the people told you GOV in twenty twenty three that
Speaker 2: they would back mandatory identity cards. Most people in the
Speaker 2: UK haven't been keen however, on hair Starmer's Plans two
Speaker 2: and three have concerns regarding the security of their personal
Speaker 2: data as well, because you know, if you've got biometric
Speaker 2: data and somebody hacks a database, you can't get a
Speaker 2: new face or fingerprints presumably, so there is going to
Speaker 2: be a digital ID protest. I want to show this
Speaker 2: to people because I know we have some people who
Speaker 2: listen in the UK Mass compliance protest Central London one
Speaker 2: pm tomorrow I'm sorry, not tomorrow, eighteenth of October, so
Speaker 2: keep that in mind. You'll probably see more of this
Speaker 2: resist digital ID. They fear the people most when we
Speaker 2: stand together, and the people did show up with that
Speaker 2: gigantic protest called Unite the Kingdom that was put together
Speaker 2: by Tommy Robinson. So this would be a good time
Speaker 2: for people to stand up and may be your last chance.
Speaker 2: Otherwise you get a black mark on your ID card
Speaker 2: and they will use this traffic light system to stop you,
Speaker 2: just like doing Channa. That's where they want to go.
Speaker 2: They use China as their beta test site. They design
Speaker 2: what they want to do, the implement it in China
Speaker 2: and work out the bugs on this thing. So two
Speaker 2: out of three have concerns regarding the security of their
Speaker 2: personal data. They should have that as a concern. A
Speaker 2: petition already has been signed by more than one hundred
Speaker 2: and thirty hundred people that says we think this would
Speaker 2: be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and
Speaker 2: that no one should be forced to register with a
Speaker 2: state controlled ID system. It adds ID cards were scrapped
Speaker 2: in twenty ten and in our view it was done
Speaker 2: for good reason, absolutely absolutely case. Well, they've also put
Speaker 2: up this meme about the digital ID. We created the problem,
Speaker 2: now we're offering the solution. And they've got cartoon caricatures
Speaker 2: there of King Charles and Hair Starmer, Tony Blair, Bill
Speaker 2: Gates and Klaus Hair Klaus a digital euro Meanwhile, is
Speaker 2: this is an article coming out from the European Central Bank,
Speaker 2: and the person there is Piero Sibaloni. He's an executive
Speaker 2: board member. He's pushing the European Central Bank and the
Speaker 2: European CBDC. They are so far gone that they don't
Speaker 2: even bother to rebrand CBDC. You know, that's when you
Speaker 2: know things are really bad. It's bad enough when Trump
Speaker 2: and his cabal are setting up functionally equivalent with the
Speaker 2: stable coins, but at least they're concerned enough about public
Speaker 2: opinion that they change the name from CBDC, even if
Speaker 2: it retains the same dystopian features as the CBDC does.
Speaker 2: But in Europe they can just call it a CBDC
Speaker 2: and nobody really cares about that anymore. It's this is
Speaker 2: a country that is on assisted suicide, and the people
Speaker 2: who are assisting them are people like Harrik Klaus and
Speaker 2: Ursula fond of lying. They're more than happy to assist
Speaker 2: Europeans and suicide. The European Union is long planned Central
Speaker 2: Bank Digital Currency Project CBDC. It's facing delays, with its
Speaker 2: launch now expected around mid twenty twenty nine. So it
Speaker 2: isn't whether or not it's going to happen by the
Speaker 2: timeframe in which is going to happen. So I think
Speaker 2: it's going to happen about the middle of twenty twenty nine,
Speaker 2: which is still just in time for their planned twenty
Speaker 2: thirty dystopia. They're smart cities and everything else. The European
Speaker 2: Parliament has been the biggest obstacle to progress progress with
Speaker 2: a digital euro as it must pass legislation to move
Speaker 2: forward with a project, we should arrive at a general approach,
Speaker 2: as they call it, an agreement among member states by
Speaker 2: the end of this year. Parliament is likely to have
Speaker 2: a position on a digital Euro by May of next year.
Speaker 2: It's very very close, Sipoloni said. European authorities are pressing
Speaker 2: ahead with the CBDC preparations, with the European Central Bank
Speaker 2: targeting October to decide whether to move to the next phase.
Speaker 2: What do you think the chances of that are. It's
Speaker 2: been five years in the making. They began rolling it
Speaker 2: out guess when in twenty twenty, and it was right
Speaker 2: before all this stuff hit. It was an October of sorry,
Speaker 2: it already hit in early twenty I'm thinking for a second,
Speaker 2: they're twenty nineteen. No. In October twenty twenty, the Digital
Speaker 2: Euro project emerged as one of Europe's long standing financial initiatives.
Speaker 2: By twenty twenty three, the European Commission published a legal
Speaker 2: proposal for it, yet progress with the Parliament has remained limited.
Speaker 2: China launched a pilot digital yuan wallet in early twenty
Speaker 2: twenty two. However, the digital Yuan has encountered slow adoption,
Speaker 2: with critics describing many CBDCs as costly replicas of Fiat
Speaker 2: currency rather than genuine fintech innovations. So again, it's not
Speaker 2: a out what they say it is about. It's still
Speaker 2: another form of digital ida and control. So that brings
Speaker 2: us to Peter Teel, who is always talking, it seems, anymore,
Speaker 2: about the Antichrist, or at least how he imagines an
Speaker 2: Antichrist's coming and what he has done. And I've mentioned
Speaker 2: this before, but it's come up yet again because now
Speaker 2: he's holding his four part lecture series on it, which
Speaker 2: is closed to the public, and if anybody releases some details,
Speaker 2: that person is in trouble with the establishment there in
Speaker 2: Silicon Valley. Look say, well, what's their enforcement mechanism. Somebody
Speaker 2: did publish their notes after the first day, and that
Speaker 2: person got a severe tongue lashing and their ticket revoked
Speaker 2: for the next three days. But I think, as somebody
Speaker 2: who is a mover and shaker, a CEO in Silicon Valley,
Speaker 2: you do not want to get on the bad side
Speaker 2: of the PayPal mafia and the PayPal mafia's godfather, who
Speaker 2: is Peter. I think that is the biggest a turn.
Speaker 2: I think that there is some enforcement issues to be
Speaker 2: had there. Peter Thiel claims an a lecture about religion
Speaker 2: that the devil promises peace and safety by strangling technological
Speaker 2: progress with regulation. Know, the problem is is that when
Speaker 2: they point this out in this article, is that the
Speaker 2: government is always promising peace and safety for everything that
Speaker 2: they do. And it's not just because they're not just
Speaker 2: promising peace and safety with regulation of artificial intelligence. And
Speaker 2: I think without any regulation of artificial intelligence, there isn't
Speaker 2: going to be any peace or safety. But that's something
Speaker 2: that the government wants with that. But everything that the
Speaker 2: government does, they always promise you safety, and they promise
Speaker 2: you that if you just give up your liberty, they
Speaker 2: will make you safe, and it's never true and you
Speaker 2: don't deserve it even if you were to get it,
Speaker 2: but you never do get it. The Ministry of Defense
Speaker 2: in the UK is going to spend three quarters of
Speaker 2: a billion dollars unpalanteer and so this is how AI
Speaker 2: is going to be used. As this report at the
Speaker 2: Times The London Times, teal donor to trump mentor to
Speaker 2: Vance said that fearing or regulating promising technology and scientific progress,
Speaker 2: including an AI, risked courting the devil, going to the
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal, which cited people who attended the event.
Speaker 2: The Times has previously reported on Teal's devout Christian views. Well,
Speaker 2: he may be devout in it, but they are not
Speaker 2: Christian views by any stretch of the imagination. I mean,
Speaker 2: not everybody even believes that there is an Antichrist. The
Speaker 2: spirit of Antichrist's opposition to Christ, that's always there everywhere,
Speaker 2: but certainly nobody envisions the people who envision and individual
Speaker 2: Antichrist do not envision it at all. Like Peter Teel,
Speaker 2: and he was even called out in some of these interviews.
Speaker 2: It sounds like what you're describing as you it sounds
Speaker 2: like you're just driving yourself. Teal is in the midst
Speaker 2: of delivering a sold out series of lectures on the Antichrist.
Speaker 2: With his spend with his reimagination. They have an organization there,
Speaker 2: as I've mentioned before, Acts seventeen Collective. The Acts is
Speaker 2: not the Acts of the Bible. It is acknowledging Christ
Speaker 2: and technology and society. Founded last year by Michelle Stevens,
Speaker 2: wife of Trey Stevens, who is a partner of Teals
Speaker 2: in his Founder's fund venture capital firm Stevens is also
Speaker 2: a co founder of Androil Industries, which makes them sells
Speaker 2: autonomous weapons systems with Lucky Palmer, right, and so he
Speaker 2: is at These guys are at the center of everything
Speaker 2: that I think will be used to create a government
Speaker 2: beast type of oppression. The talks were marketed as off
Speaker 2: the record, but a guest of the first four talks
Speaker 2: published notes on the first lecture on his personal website.
Speaker 2: His post has since been removed, but was picked up
Speaker 2: by the San Francisco Standard and reportedly said that Teo
Speaker 2: argued that because we're increasingly concerned about existential threats, the
Speaker 2: time is ripe for the Antichrist to rise the power
Speaker 2: promising peace and safety by strangling technological progress with regulation.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you, Christ did not come for technological progress.
Speaker 2: This guy does not have a clue as to what
Speaker 2: he's talking about. Jesus did not come for a kingdom
Speaker 2: of this earth, let alone for technological progress. That's not
Speaker 2: why he came and died.
Speaker 4: Hair Starmers also like, I've got this important information about
Speaker 4: the Antichrist and the end of the world, I'm going
Speaker 4: to release it privately, just to the people that pay me.
Speaker 4: In this secret meeting, and if anyone posts it online,
Speaker 4: we're going to have to have them take down anything
Speaker 4: they say about it. No one can know about the
Speaker 4: Antichrist except for those that pay me.
Speaker 3: You're probably to find a lecture. You're just gonna lean
Speaker 3: in and go by the way.
Speaker 2: It's me, that's right. Yeah, If it's not him and
Speaker 2: a confession, then why can't you talk about it? Good point, guys.
Speaker 2: Michelle Stevens is reported to have said, the software executive
Speaker 2: behind the post, you are in violation of the clear
Speaker 2: off record policy we implemented and reiterated many times. Your
Speaker 2: ticket is revoked without refund and he's going to be
Speaker 2: persona non grata with all of these venture with all
Speaker 2: these Silicon Valley executives, I guess as well. Teal has
Speaker 2: previously warned against the emergence of an individual or a
Speaker 2: system that can exploit fears of global catastrophe driven by
Speaker 2: AI to enforce a one world to solitary and state
Speaker 2: that underminds human freedom. So it's trying to protect us
Speaker 2: from this thing that Altman and so many people have
Speaker 2: been out there saying AI is going to kill us all,
Speaker 2: it's going to rule us all it's going to kill
Speaker 2: us all. If you try to do anything to stop that,
Speaker 2: then you are the bad guy. You are the Antichrist,
Speaker 2: because you know, Jesus is all about technology. Trump and
Speaker 2: Teal are using AI to supercharge the surveillance state. That's
Speaker 2: the real issue, and that's the real threat, the real threat.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, it's not that AI is going to
Speaker 2: become this thinking machine. It's not thinking at all. It's
Speaker 2: using a statistical correlation to come up with things that
Speaker 2: sound like it's thinking, but it is not thinking and
Speaker 2: it will never be like a human being. We have
Speaker 2: created the image of God, not AI. But the real
Speaker 2: danger is the evil people who are creating the image
Speaker 2: of God using this tool as a tool of surveillance.
Speaker 2: It is able, and I said this from the very beginning.
Speaker 2: When you look at what AI is able to do,
Speaker 2: it is able to sort through vast mountains of data
Speaker 2: to find the needle in that haystack. And that's what's
Speaker 2: really dangerous about it. They've always used this When we
Speaker 2: would get file requests for information, what they would do
Speaker 2: is they would tip it. We dumped so much information
Speaker 2: on it so we couldn't find anything, and it's like Hey,
Speaker 2: it's all there. I complied with it. You just can't
Speaker 2: find it because it's just a little tiny needle on astack.
Speaker 2: But with AI you can do that. And you take
Speaker 2: a look at how Pulty at the FAHA has weaponized AI,
Speaker 2: and he bragged about it. That's how he found I
Speaker 2: think it was that Lutissa James who has some suspect
Speaker 2: mortgage stuff. But that's how they came after Lisa Cook,
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve governor. They used AI to find it.
Speaker 2: I said, this is stalin esque. Bring me the man,
Speaker 2: or in this case, the black woman, and I'll find
Speaker 2: the crime. That's what the tyrants have always done, and
Speaker 2: now they can do that with AI. You got somebody
Speaker 2: want to get out because of some reason, stift through
Speaker 2: their life, audit everything in their life for the most
Speaker 2: minor infractions. And of course is silver Gate said, you know,
Speaker 2: we all commit three phone news a day because there's
Speaker 2: so much stuff that's on the books. My speculative, Lisis
Speaker 2: said Teal, is that if the Antichrist were to come
Speaker 2: to power, it would be by talking about armageddon all
Speaker 2: the time, which is what he does. The greatest danger
Speaker 2: we face, according to Tel, might not be from global warming, terrorism,
Speaker 2: nuclear winter, or AI going rogue. The real danger is
Speaker 2: that we're afraid of these threats, so afraid that we're
Speaker 2: willing to give up our freedom in the interest of
Speaker 2: peace and safety. Well, that's a political remedy, not something
Speaker 2: that Christ was about. Of course, Christ was about casting
Speaker 2: out fear. Fear is the opposite of faith, but in
Speaker 2: terms of the exchange of vital liberty or dangerous liberty,
Speaker 2: exchanging that for the promise of peace and safety. The
Speaker 2: founders all warned us about that. He said, I feel
Speaker 2: like the Antichrist would maybe be using the tools that
Speaker 2: you are building, said the person who was interviewing him.
Speaker 2: Ross Duethought on a podcast raring course to Pallunteer, which again,
Speaker 2: as as mentioned, they have a three quarter of a
Speaker 2: billion dollar contract with the UK, but they're heavily involved
Speaker 2: in the US as well. It's equipping government with tools
Speaker 2: to set through massive data troves to identify patterns, hunt
Speaker 2: down illegal immigrants. It's also helping the FEDES deploy facial
Speaker 2: recognition technology and has created AI tools to predict where
Speaker 2: crimes might happen in advance. That was the other thing
Speaker 2: that's interesting, you know, because the acronym that they used
Speaker 2: for that was also AI, but that AI was anticipatory intelligence,
Speaker 2: and Polunteer has been heavily involved in that first abroad
Speaker 2: and then those instruments of tyranny, as Madison Warren have
Speaker 2: been brought home. Anticipatory intelligence has been used in a
Speaker 2: lot of places with law enforcement, for example, to predict
Speaker 2: crime pre crime, and it's all about geospatial intelligence and
Speaker 2: profiling people, especially over their religious political beliefs. Person said like,
Speaker 2: wouldn't Antichrist be great? We're not going to have any
Speaker 2: more technological progress, but I really like what Volunteer has
Speaker 2: done so far, said to thought. To Teal, he says,
Speaker 2: isn't that a concern? Wouldn't that be the irony of
Speaker 2: history that the man publicly worrying about the Antichrist accidentally
Speaker 2: hastens his or her arrival and or is that person
Speaker 2: or enacts all the things that he said that person
Speaker 2: would do. When Teal replied that hastening the Antichrist's arrival
Speaker 2: is obviously not what he thinks he's doing, the interviewer
Speaker 2: agreed that it was unlikely, but he still pressed. He said, well,
Speaker 2: I'm just interested in how you get to a world
Speaker 2: that is willing to submit to permanent authoritarian rule. While
Speaker 2: Peter Teel was warning that the Antichrist could be totalitarianism
Speaker 2: by exploiting our desire for peace and safety, the company
Speaker 2: that he co founded is building the tools with great
Speaker 2: potential for abuse by tutulitarian savelist state, all based on
Speaker 2: our desire for peace and safety. This is the circular logic,
Speaker 2: the inverted logic of all this, and that is pointed
Speaker 2: out by Reason magazine. As I talked about the Yes.
Speaker 4: Teal statements only make sense if you envision him turning
Speaker 4: away from the camera and laughing maniacally after each one
Speaker 4: of them. It would come to power by talking about
Speaker 4: the Onmageddon all the time.
Speaker 2: I should do that with Ai. Shent me. Yeah, if
Speaker 2: we can only get Ai to take direction. So, after
Speaker 2: the nine to eleven terrorist attacks which kicked off folks,
Speaker 2: the police and surveillance state, which was the first shoe
Speaker 2: to drop, the second shoe, the COVID pandemic that Trump
Speaker 2: administered to us, led to the expansion of the surveillance
Speaker 2: state under a new paradigm known as total information awareness.
Speaker 2: Remember that I've talked about this many times, and I've
Speaker 2: talked about the role of the secret societies that control
Speaker 2: our government. The CIA and the rest of these that
Speaker 2: are used their venture capital funding to push this stuff through.
Speaker 2: Here's the story about how they did it with Palateer.
Speaker 2: Total information Awareness was what Palateer is now, says Reason magazine.
Speaker 2: All this stuff, at the end of the day is
Speaker 2: fear based. That's how we get a lot of this
Speaker 2: surveillance mentality, said Eddington, a former CIA analyst who is
Speaker 2: now with the libertarian Cato Institute. His latest book is
Speaker 2: The Triumph of Fear. He said. Total Information Awareness was
Speaker 2: an initiative that was started at DARPA. The stated goal
Speaker 2: was to construct I'm sorry here, construct a virtual, centralized
Speaker 2: grand database for tracking terrorists, the same kind of database
Speaker 2: that Trump wants to build to track illegal immigrants. And
Speaker 2: they can just easily repurpose it to everybody right. Public
Speaker 2: backlash to the unnerving name led to a rebranding before
Speaker 2: Unger's defunded the program in two thousand and three. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they rebranded it as Facebook, and then they reinvented it
Speaker 2: as Polateer. Total Information Awareness lived on under the innocuous
Speaker 2: code name Basketball. And you know, actually Facebook was not
Speaker 2: total Information Awareness Facebook was Lifelog, the Lifelog program, We're
Speaker 2: going to keep a record of everything you do in
Speaker 2: your life. Palleteer was actually very closely Total Information Awareness.
Speaker 2: Later they continued on and called it basketball and it
Speaker 2: was absorbed by the NSA, not the NBA, which Ed
Speaker 2: Snowden would later reveal was collecting the phone records of
Speaker 2: millions of Americans and intercepting web traffic without the knowledge
Speaker 2: of the companies involved, which is what I was talking
Speaker 2: about before. James Clapper knew that, and he lied to
Speaker 2: the American people about that, but he was never charged
Speaker 2: with poetry. But we're going to go after Cami because
Speaker 2: what he lied about affected Trump personally, and that's all
Speaker 2: that Trump cares about. The same year the Congress dedfan
Speaker 2: on hundred Total Information Awareness, Peter Teel and his co
Speaker 2: founders created Palateer. They even met with John Poindexter, the
Speaker 2: recently fired director of Total Information Awareness, who told them
Speaker 2: that they had an interesting idea quote unquote. Initially, the
Speaker 2: company struggled to attract mainstream investment, but when the CIA's
Speaker 2: venture capital arm Incutel put in two million dollars, it
Speaker 2: signaled interest from Washington and the company took off. Today
Speaker 2: Pollunteer is worth more than four hundred billion, with a
Speaker 2: b over half of its revenue coming from government contracts.
Speaker 2: So ink, tell how.
Speaker 4: This keeps happening. You know, they have a lifelog and
Speaker 4: then the same right after it gets taken down Facebook,
Speaker 4: and hey, it's just like it. What a perfect coincidence,
Speaker 4: and then you have total information awareness. It gets replaced
Speaker 4: a Valenteer.
Speaker 2: Always a private company, and these guys always become multi billionaires,
Speaker 2: and it's always on the venture capital board. Is either
Speaker 2: incutel for the CIA or individuals who were with the
Speaker 2: NSA and the CIA. They also cash in on all
Speaker 2: this stuff as well, and of course the CIA has
Speaker 2: long been involved in secretive weapons creation and other issues.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, Tony Sheen is putting out
Speaker 2: all kinds of content about his life and where his
Speaker 2: life went wrong and all this stuff. The biggest thing
Speaker 2: for him, he said, that really took him down was
Speaker 2: crack cocaine. Remember who created crack cocaine, So that was
Speaker 2: the CIA, And they even set up Freeway Ricky Ross
Speaker 2: to run all the stuff through it. They invented crack cocaine,
Speaker 2: they sold it in LA and in other places and
Speaker 2: then used the money for their secret wars and who
Speaker 2: knows what else personally using it as well. So ink,
Speaker 2: you tell that they would always do these types of
Speaker 2: things in secret. And of course when we talk about
Speaker 2: the scourge of drugs, just understand that the drug war
Speaker 2: has not done anything. The drug war has destroyed the
Speaker 2: rule of law, destroyed law enforcement, destroyed the judiciary, and
Speaker 2: is now being used to drag us into an actual war.
Speaker 2: But the people who have created some of the most
Speaker 2: virulent forms of these drugs are our own government itself.
Speaker 2: When the creation of Crackcoa came by the CIA, to
Speaker 2: the guarding and the expansion of the poppy fields in
Speaker 2: Afghanistan is our own government. Let's put the biggest drug
Speaker 2: pusher out there. So when you look at Incutel, they
Speaker 2: actually went public with their own venture capital firm because
Speaker 2: they wanted to help people that they knew they would
Speaker 2: be able to control, to create the Internet, because the
Speaker 2: Internet was a tool of control also created by DARPA,
Speaker 2: you know, not just the total information awareness thing. I
Speaker 2: know many of you have heard this before, but it
Speaker 2: bears repeating and we need to memorize this and get
Speaker 2: it out to other people so they understand what's really
Speaker 2: going on. How this is a long range plan. All
Speaker 2: of this ICE is now using mobile facial detection technology
Speaker 2: to track immigrants and to tie their identities to derogatory information.
Speaker 2: Oh next Week can use it for people that say
Speaker 2: something about Charlie kirk right. The agency also uses Clearview
Speaker 2: AI facial recognition tape that scrapes social media, and much
Speaker 2: of the data is managed by Palanteer. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, Clearview has got a lot of contracts with
Speaker 2: law enforcement in Louisiana and many other places. But I
Speaker 2: remember they had a big deal about it in Louisiana.
Speaker 2: Even if you support Trump's objective to deport more immigrants,
Speaker 2: you should still be concerned about this technology and how
Speaker 2: it's being used. That's why I say, yeah, we don't
Speaker 2: want to have illegal immigrants and we don't want to
Speaker 2: have drugs. But look at the way that they're approaching
Speaker 2: this problem. You know, there's other ways to approach it.
Speaker 2: And these ways are just like they say, well, get
Speaker 2: a digital ID because we've got a problem of illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2: Well you created that problem, and the digital ID is
Speaker 2: not going to stop the problem either. It's going to
Speaker 2: be another means of control that's going to be yet
Speaker 2: another problem. And that's what they constantly are doing with
Speaker 2: these things, like many surveillans tools of the past, immigrants
Speaker 2: and foreigners are fertile testing ground before it is rolled
Speaker 2: out to the wider domestic population. People on the Republican
Speaker 2: side should really not be cheering about this stuff that's
Speaker 2: going on right now, because if Democrats manage to retake
Speaker 2: the White House and both Chambers of Commerce, and time
Speaker 2: makes that inevitable, then they could turn around and use
Speaker 2: those same tools, says Eddington. And by the way, that's
Speaker 2: exactly what my own work in this book basically shows
Speaker 2: that it is bipartisan, the MAGA movement, and it's bipartisan.
Speaker 2: Both parties want this, but both parties will use this
Speaker 2: against the other side, so the other side will scream
Speaker 2: and make people think that they're against it and they're not.
Speaker 2: The MAGA movement should understand what it's like to walk
Speaker 2: under the gaze of the eye of Sarhan. After the
Speaker 2: January sixth riot, right wing extremism became a priority for
Speaker 2: America's intelligence agencies. Online censorship reached that zenith under the
Speaker 2: Biden administration, which leaned on social media companies to suppress
Speaker 2: speech that criticized COVID policies or questioned election integrity. Eddington
Speaker 2: says that since its inception, federal law enforcement has been
Speaker 2: weaponized to go after not just criminals, but political dissonance,
Speaker 2: which FBI did with their co Intel pro program of
Speaker 2: the fifties and sixties. It's easy to imagine how the
Speaker 2: technology that Palateer is building to help the government keep
Speaker 2: tabs on terrorists and illegal immigrants in the interest of
Speaker 2: peace and safety could be applied more broadly. And this
Speaker 2: is especially true when I continue to come back to
Speaker 2: Trump's actions against these alleged and then they are ledged,
Speaker 2: not proven drug runners in Venezuela, just just killing them
Speaker 2: on site. Be careful. That's going to be used in
Speaker 2: a lot of different ways. He's setting up a precedent
Speaker 2: for that. This is a guy who believes that the
Speaker 2: military should be used in law enforcement. That is as
Speaker 2: un American as you can get. Snowden has predicted that
Speaker 2: governments will soon use the AI enhanced to aveillance not
Speaker 2: merely to fight terrorism or to port immigrants, but to
Speaker 2: shape behavior. We are all entering a new phase of
Speaker 2: history where what we considered the more enlightened collection of
Speaker 2: states globally are now some of those working the hardest
Speaker 2: to roll it back to bureaucratize, to influence, to nudge,
Speaker 2: to shape, to ultimately control each and every individual within
Speaker 2: their territory and beyond, said Snowden at a conference in
Speaker 2: Singapore last year. So Western civilization that used to talk
Speaker 2: about and value the issues of privacy and liberty and
Speaker 2: dignity and freedom that they have now become so drunk
Speaker 2: with power that this massive expanse of Babylon is now
Speaker 2: using it to try to attack each and every individual.
Speaker 2: Teal is also worried about AI. He says, if you
Speaker 2: were to say that crypto is libertarian, then why can't
Speaker 2: we say that AI is communist? Said Teal. So even
Speaker 2: though he's worried that this is going to get this
Speaker 2: backlash against AI is going to be used to set
Speaker 2: up an authoritarian government, he admits that AI is a
Speaker 2: big problem. He says, it's not completely inherent in it,
Speaker 2: but it's a certain tendency in it. And while I
Speaker 2: am pro acceleration and I'm pro tech, I'm even pro AI.
Speaker 2: It is probably the one technology that I have the
Speaker 2: most misgivings about Alex s. Carp CEO of Polleteer, gave
Speaker 2: the technology to the Ukrainian military free of charge. He said,
Speaker 2: the goal should be to make sure that these tools
Speaker 2: are in the hands of the good guys. This is
Speaker 2: a guy who names his companies after Tolkien's story but
Speaker 2: evidently didn't understand it, and he really doesn't if you
Speaker 2: read his book, and I mentioned that I did a
Speaker 2: substack thing on where this guy is coming from. It
Speaker 2: truly is frightening to see somebody with his worldview have
Speaker 2: as much money and power as he does, and to
Speaker 2: think that, you know, he can wield it and not
Speaker 2: be corrupted by it. He's not going to fall into
Speaker 2: the same trap as Bormir or Gladriel right now. He
Speaker 2: can handle it or Gollum, and he can handle that
Speaker 2: ring of power. It's not a temptation to him at all. Well,
Speaker 2: if you read his book, I think you can already
Speaker 2: see that he is goalam already. We were asked if
Speaker 2: we were willing to supply our product for free to Ukraine.
Speaker 2: I was very in favor of this because our goal
Speaker 2: is to set a global standard for the world for
Speaker 2: behavior and to monitor behavior he said this, by the way.
Speaker 2: He said this, by the way, at the World Economic
Speaker 2: Forum in twenty twenty three, that he's going to start
Speaker 2: a global standard for behavior. John Joe Lonsdelle, a Pounteer
Speaker 2: co founder, previously told Reason that the company actually was
Speaker 2: formed to protect civil liberties, as it aids the government
Speaker 2: in catching terrorists. Yeah right, yeah, all these people who
Speaker 2: are fighting the war on terror, they were really about
Speaker 2: civil liberties from the name, weren't they. Peter Thiel has
Speaker 2: warned it's easy to go from the frying pan into
Speaker 2: the fire. Tools designed for hunting down illegal immigrants or
Speaker 2: combatants in Gaza or Ukraine can be repurposed. Maybe he
Speaker 2: read Madison and the Lord of the Rings, says Reason,
Speaker 2: the wizard Sarman starts on the side of good. The
Speaker 2: villainous Siren manipulates him to the Pounteer Stone to make
Speaker 2: the wizard believe that he sees the future where Siren's
Speaker 2: evil plan triumphs. But it's all a deception. Well, you
Speaker 2: can't trust anything except the real Bible. Don't get pulled in.
Speaker 2: I don't know none of you. We get pulled into
Speaker 2: the absurdity of Peter Thiel's new spin on Christianity. But
Speaker 2: that is what he's doing, and it is a very
Speaker 2: dangerous thing that's going to be pulling in some of
Speaker 2: these powerful movers and shakers who are not interested in Christ,
Speaker 2: They're not interested in God. They're not interested, of course,
Speaker 2: then in any ethics or morality. Meanwhile, Trump is pushing
Speaker 2: yet another UN agenda, and this is the one used
Speaker 2: to use AI to enforce bioweapons ban. How many times
Speaker 2: does Trump have to jump in and become the leader
Speaker 2: of the UN agenda, grab the football and run it
Speaker 2: down the field for the UN, for the World Economic
Speaker 2: Forum before MAGA catches on. I don't think they'll ever
Speaker 2: catch on. So he' said the president who has this
Speaker 2: is New American and they're right. He is a self
Speaker 2: styled critic of globalism because he is not actually working
Speaker 2: against globalism. He loves all of these globalist agendas. He
Speaker 2: loves the UN, he loves what the World Health Organization
Speaker 2: was doing with the lockdowns and pandemics. He's just playing
Speaker 2: lip service to opposing it. So the President, a self
Speaker 2: styled critic of globalism, nevertheless urged the globalist body with
Speaker 2: planetary ambitions that would be the UN to play a
Speaker 2: constructive role in developing this far reaching project. He framed
Speaker 2: it as an urgent necessity. The catastrophic potential, he said,
Speaker 2: of terrible biological and nuclear weapons, is clear. Their proliferation,
Speaker 2: Trump argued, threatens nothing less than the end of the
Speaker 2: world and makes action imperative. Well, this is Trump invoked
Speaker 2: the devastating COVID pandemic. See, this is part of the
Speaker 2: fruit of his lab lie that he and his nudge
Speaker 2: have been pushing, and now everybody's into it because it
Speaker 2: gives them an alibi for the past. It gives them
Speaker 2: an incentive for the things that they want to do
Speaker 2: in the future. If you believe that this all came
Speaker 2: out of the lab. It did come out of the lab.
Speaker 2: The vaccine came out of the lab, not the alleged
Speaker 2: pandemic that is out there. But if he can sell that,
Speaker 2: he said, yeah, this is quote the result of a
Speaker 2: reckless experiment overseas. Well, that's the lie, right, And the
Speaker 2: question is if you believe that was the case, If
Speaker 2: you really believe that, if it came out of a
Speaker 2: lab and we were funding it and it could destroy
Speaker 2: all of humanity, why are you still funding it? You know,
Speaker 2: all of this gain of function, playing around and everything
Speaker 2: with deadly and dangerous diseases that was all exposed as
Speaker 2: something that was risky with very little benefit. In twenty fourteen,
Speaker 2: Alison Young The USA Today ran a great series of
Speaker 2: articles talking about all the accidents that have been at
Speaker 2: the CDC, diseased animals that released in the wild, diseases
Speaker 2: that these scientists are playing around with, and they had
Speaker 2: faulty equipment, and on and on and on, and so
Speaker 2: they shut that down in twenty fourteen. Well, Fauci and
Speaker 2: Fancist Collins continued to do it on their own initiative
Speaker 2: and defiance of Congress shifting money to that, and so
Speaker 2: we all know that story. The person who started it
Speaker 2: back up in twenty seventeen was Trump. One of the
Speaker 2: first things he did when he got back into office,
Speaker 2: the Trump administration restarted this program that he says created
Speaker 2: COVID that was so horrible, and he hasn't stopped it yet.
Speaker 2: So again, everything the man does is exactly the opposite
Speaker 2: of what he says. You have to watch what he does,
Speaker 2: not what he says. He described this the COVID pandemic
Speaker 2: as a result of reckless experiments overseas quote unquote, the
Speaker 2: virus itself proved far less destructive than the early coordinated
Speaker 2: global response that shattered economies and societies, says the New
Speaker 2: American And they're right. The president who oversaw America's own
Speaker 2: COVID response warrened quote. Despite the worldwide catastrophe, many countries
Speaker 2: are continuing extremely risky research like your own. You're the
Speaker 2: one who restarted it, and you keep doing it. Just
Speaker 2: amazing what this guy can get away with and to
Speaker 2: bio weapons and man made pathogens. He said this must stop,
Speaker 2: and yet what is he doing. He's multiplying the mRNA
Speaker 2: drugs that are out there and helping people like Larry
Speaker 2: Elson push this forward. Look, that's the real bioweapon that's
Speaker 2: out there, right there in your face. All this stuff
Speaker 2: about Fauci and the wu Han lab, that's not the
Speaker 2: real danger. The real dangers all these mRNA drugs that
Speaker 2: they're putting out there. What data would ai rely on,
Speaker 2: who would control it, what oversight would exist, and perhaps
Speaker 2: most crucial, how can this new system be trusted when
Speaker 2: not a single person has ever been held accountable for
Speaker 2: the risky experiments behind COVID. Even if you go with
Speaker 2: their narrative about the lab leak. Nobody has ever been
Speaker 2: held accountable for it. All of them will say, oh,
Speaker 2: it's Fatchi or is this person that, But they don't
Speaker 2: do anything Fauci. The Biological Warfare Convention that was signed
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy two bans the development of bioweapons, tells
Speaker 2: you everything you need to know to know that they
Speaker 2: haven't done anything about that. Right, it has no teeth,
Speaker 2: unlike nuclear Chemical Weapons Treatise that offers no inspectors, no
Speaker 2: monitoring body, no enforcement mechanism. States have long complained that
Speaker 2: it is very easy to sign and easier to ignore.
Speaker 2: So Trump didn't have any details in this. So the
Speaker 2: New American says, so, but what would this really look like? Right?
Speaker 2: The devil is in the details. What would the details
Speaker 2: look like? If you're going to have a globalist body,
Speaker 2: which is why the UN wants this, It's what Trump
Speaker 2: is selling, we need to create some global oversight body. Well,
Speaker 2: what are they going to do? How are they going
Speaker 2: to do oversight if they don't have sight into everything
Speaker 2: that we're seeing? Right, like polataire, I'm sure polunteer will
Speaker 2: have a role in this. In theory, it would serve
Speaker 2: as a vast digital sentinel, collecting signals from many sources
Speaker 2: and flagging suspicious activity. AI could scan genomic databases for
Speaker 2: unusual sequences, suggesting that there might be engineered pathogens. It
Speaker 2: could sift wastewater hospital records in public health reports. This
Speaker 2: is what they're doing with a PCR testing of sewerage water.
Speaker 2: It doesn't tell you anything. It's just used as a
Speaker 2: device to create fear and to excuse to solitarian actions.
Speaker 2: So just let they go around doing PCR sewerage stuff.
Speaker 2: That's the way this thing is going to be used.
Speaker 2: But they will have the pretext that it is real,
Speaker 2: that it is science, and as part of that pretext,
Speaker 2: it's going to demand absolute and total surveillance of anything
Speaker 2: and everyone. So drone imagery, satellite and drone imagery could
Speaker 2: be fed into algorithms trained to spot new labs or
Speaker 2: unusual construction, procurement and supply chains would have to be monitored.
Speaker 2: It would be another target of this globalist organization. AI
Speaker 2: could comb customs filings, research papers, commercial gene synthesis orders
Speaker 2: to direct attempts at buying equipment or DNA sequences suited
Speaker 2: for weaponization. All these inputs could then be fused into
Speaker 2: a single anomaly detection dashboard. Instead of inspectors knocking on doors,
Speaker 2: AI would do the watching constantly globally invisibly. There's your
Speaker 2: total information awareness, folks. That's what Trump is pushing. He's
Speaker 2: pushing a globalist surveillance network right to their face, and
Speaker 2: they don't understand it. So infuriating to see how blind
Speaker 2: these people are and willingly blind as they cheer him.
Speaker 2: And I'm disgusted with the organizations like Breitbart Info Wars
Speaker 2: that push all this stuff for him. They're out there
Speaker 2: putting the blinders on their readers, putting the masks on
Speaker 2: their faces, stabbing them in the back. The dangers are real,
Speaker 2: and algorithms make mistakes. If an algorithm points to a
Speaker 2: lab and sparks a political storm, who's responsible if the
Speaker 2: claim is wrong? Well, there's no accountability for all this stuff,
Speaker 2: as we saw with twenty twenty. In conclusion, and I
Speaker 2: agree with this conclusion by the New American they said
Speaker 2: a global AI verification system may be sold being sold
Speaker 2: by Trump as protection from catastrophe, but it risks cementing
Speaker 2: something that is far worse, a permanent regime of surveillance
Speaker 2: and control on a planetary scale. That's what Donald Trump
Speaker 2: is here to sell. You don't buy it. It's just
Speaker 2: disgusted me.
Speaker 3: We've got quite a lot of comments. Don't frag me,
Speaker 3: bro says every made assassination. We've already read that one,
Speaker 3: already read the Britain Laden Bernanke one as well.
Speaker 2: Yes, by the way, while we're finding our place there,
Speaker 2: I have a clip of Congressman Luna for you what
Speaker 2: her name is, but she's talking about She says that there.
Speaker 2: I don't know if this is true or not, but
Speaker 2: listen to what she says about the JFK assassination.
Speaker 8: I would like to actually tell the American people. It
Speaker 8: was made aware to me this evening that NBC actually
Speaker 8: has a video that's never been seen before. We're actually
Speaker 8: going to be sending a letter requesting that from NBC
Speaker 8: because it allegedly shows Oswalt near the vehicle when the
Speaker 8: assassination took place, which means that he couldn't have been
Speaker 8: the shooter. So again we're tracking down all this information.
Speaker 8: But look, there's even a CIA document that came out
Speaker 8: that mister Morley pointed out that actually said that the
Speaker 8: CIA new or bought the lone gunman theory, and so
Speaker 8: I think the American people had an inclination as to
Speaker 8: what we were saying.
Speaker 2: They were running the multiple gunmans.
Speaker 8: Do you think we were only in about one gun
Speaker 8: You operate or have an agency operating in the shadows.
Speaker 8: And so kudos to President Trump also Directory Gabberts.
Speaker 2: Both Chair President Trump and all this stuff.
Speaker 8: National changing that they've done this, and we hope to
Speaker 8: bring forward legislation to to ensure that this never happens
Speaker 8: again for future generations to come.
Speaker 7: You're saying NBC has been keeping this tape of Oswald.
Speaker 2: Do you believe that correct?
Speaker 8: In fact, uh, Director Stone actually told us that he
Speaker 8: was showed this tape, that it was a secondary copy,
Speaker 8: and that he said that this could blow open the
Speaker 8: entire GfK investigation. What I will also tell you, though, Jesse,
Speaker 8: is he said the NBC has been very very much
Speaker 8: so guarding this tape, and so I believe that that
Speaker 8: tape belongs to the American people. We are going to
Speaker 8: be sending a letter asking for that tape, and I
Speaker 8: would encourage everyone to ask NBC to release that tape
Speaker 8: to the public. It's important not just for our investigations.
Speaker 8: But so the American people know the truth as to
Speaker 8: what happened with John F.
Speaker 7: Kennedy.
Speaker 2: All right, well, I think they will release it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he thinks it will because that's Jesse Waters, and that's
Speaker 2: Fox News, and he's going to cheer Trump no matter what.
Speaker 2: Anna Paulina Luna as the congresswoman who says that. And again,
Speaker 2: I could believe that NBC would be so controlled by
Speaker 2: the CIA that they could have something like that that
Speaker 2: they wouldn't show. I don't believe they would keep it
Speaker 2: as an archive. I believe they just destroy it if
Speaker 2: that were the case. I mean, can certainly believe that
Speaker 2: the Mockingbird media would do whatever the CIA told them.
Speaker 2: I just can't believe that they would keep it.
Speaker 3: It doesn't make it any sense under wraps.
Speaker 2: And so just consider the source. I don't think that's
Speaker 2: credible whatsoever.
Speaker 3: Jesse Waters to keep the smoking gun on me so
Speaker 3: somebody can identify me, right overture. If you have a
Speaker 3: Social Security number, you already have a national ID. It's
Speaker 3: just not biometric. Yeah, iye, handy, I'm already hearing the
Speaker 3: year comes. Flu season rumbles amongst the nursing staff of
Speaker 3: the hospitals after twenty years in the MS. I think
Speaker 3: the worst flues are created by the flu jabs.
Speaker 2: Yes, I agree.
Speaker 3: North American House Hippo on Judge of Balatano, somebody referred
Speaker 3: to that woman as ursula fond of lying, and the
Speaker 3: judge burst out laughing. It's making the rounds. Hey, it's
Speaker 3: breaking containment.
Speaker 2: Welcome to use it. I think we need to hang
Speaker 2: that moniker on ap rumbles seat.
Speaker 3: Without digital ID, they can't launch digital currency and take
Speaker 3: over your access to money and society. You enough don't comply,
Speaker 3: they can't move on it.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: One thing that I was saying is they're going to
Speaker 3: make everything more inconvenient. They're going to make it a
Speaker 3: hassle for you to not have this. It's not going
Speaker 3: to be an immediate you have to get this. They
Speaker 3: don't normally do that. They don't normally come in, you know,
Speaker 3: iron hand, all at once. They're gonna make your life
Speaker 3: miserable by not having this thing. There's going to be
Speaker 3: a million different places where you're gonna need to put
Speaker 3: your ID into to prove who you are all the time.
Speaker 2: We'll give you an example. You know, when you file
Speaker 2: as an employer. When you file your W three report,
Speaker 2: they have a piece of paper that is printed and
Speaker 2: read okay, and you can file a report on that.
Speaker 2: But if you lose it, your annual report on that.
Speaker 2: If you lose that, the only way that you can
Speaker 2: do it is electronically. And if you just try, if
Speaker 2: you try to submit that report on paper and it
Speaker 2: isn't that particular kind of red, and they literally have
Speaker 2: a specification that talks about the shade of red. I mean,
Speaker 2: we're not just talking about matching this thing up so
Speaker 2: they can scan it in. But it's got to be
Speaker 2: this particular shade of red, and it's got to be
Speaker 2: this it's got to be that. They will charge you
Speaker 2: like three hundred dollars a report that you submit and
Speaker 2: so you know that's the way they'll do this kind
Speaker 2: of stuff. So your only option then, if you don't
Speaker 2: have that magic piece of paper that they have specified
Speaker 2: out the wazoo, then you have to do it electronically. Yeah,
Speaker 2: if you electronically, you got to go through all their
Speaker 2: ID verification, all the rest of this stuff as well.
Speaker 3: I'm sure they're going to make it a lot easier
Speaker 3: with the digital ID. It's going to be a one
Speaker 3: click sort of thing. Oh, you can just submit it
Speaker 3: right here. Isn't that so simple and fast? Yeah, you
Speaker 3: don't want to deal with this hassle, You don't want
Speaker 3: all this extra paperwork. Just get the digital ID and
Speaker 3: it's one button press and you're done.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: A video we played yesterday of the bureaucrat in Britain saying, oh,
Speaker 4: look at all these horrible uh hoops you have to
Speaker 4: jump through if any government thing to get any benefits. Well,
Speaker 4: now you'll just have one.
Speaker 3: I d mmmmm, I want to be wonderful.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like simplifying a thanks go just make it one line?
Speaker 2: How much money did you make? Send it all in.
Speaker 3: Everything? Ap rumblest teals bs, weaponized religious mania is the
Speaker 3: is the like the devil himself denying he exists. It's
Speaker 3: like the devil himself denying he exists. A Syrian girl
Speaker 3: Tealo is ob sir that it's hard to believe he
Speaker 3: has a following, but he's not the first scammer to
Speaker 3: drum up a bass. It really goes to show you
Speaker 3: what a bunch of idiots and fools Silicon Valleys and
Speaker 3: these tech elite quote unquote are that they're paying to
Speaker 3: get talked to by teal about this sort of thing.
Speaker 2: Well, they measure intelligence by what the guy's got in
Speaker 2: the bank, right. It's a thing that I talk about
Speaker 2: all the time. If I'm a fiddle on the roof,
Speaker 2: you know, if I were a rich man, you know,
Speaker 2: I'd said all day in the gate and I would
Speaker 2: talk and they would think that I really know why
Speaker 2: because I'm rich, I really know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 3: North American house Hippo flying guy Handy says, I was
Speaker 3: watching a documentary about East Germany of the good old days.
Speaker 3: A guy who went to prison for smuggling. Later found
Speaker 3: out the Stasi informer who read it about was his
Speaker 3: own priest.
Speaker 2: Wow. Yeah, Yeah, that was an interesting thing that happened
Speaker 2: about eight or nine years ago. There was a woman
Speaker 2: who was an American communist and she dearly loved East Germany.
Speaker 2: She loved it, so she was writing about it, studying
Speaker 2: about She wanted to go live there and write about it. Well,
Speaker 2: that made her suspect to the Stazi, because they said,
Speaker 2: who in the right mind would want to come live here,
Speaker 2: So they had people all over her. She wound up
Speaker 2: marrying an East German guy, so she could stay there,
Speaker 2: and you know, but she never got past the suspicion
Speaker 2: of the East German Stazi. So they had all these informants,
Speaker 2: and she said, when they released these files after the
Speaker 2: unification of East and West Germany, she saw that all
Speaker 2: of her neighbors were informing on her. All these people
Speaker 2: she thought were her friends were really informing on her.
Speaker 2: They had like half of the country informing on the
Speaker 2: other half. That's why I think it's so despicable for
Speaker 2: Jadie Vance to be doing that. You see somebody saying
Speaker 2: something you don't like about Charlie Kirk, call their employer,
Speaker 2: get them fired, you know. And this is a Stazi
Speaker 2: mentality that is there. It's absolutely disgusting.
Speaker 3: Niburu twenty twenty nine. Per twenty ten calculations, government workers
Speaker 3: cost the private sector one trillion yearly ex sort of
Speaker 3: taxes to fund the over bloated feral systems.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, and they are feral. That's a good
Speaker 2: way to put it. Well, we're gonna take a quick break.
Speaker 2: When we come back, we've got some stuff about AI.
Speaker 2: Stay with us. We will be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 9: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 9: the same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 9: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 9: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 9: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 9: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 9: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 9: American suckers can buy me some at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 9: You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
Speaker 9: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
Speaker 9: something other than green military cosplay to my various gallas
Speaker 9: and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 9: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 9: missiles coming from the USA.
Speaker 10: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laos, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 10: Report makes for a stunning and sobering reader for the
Speaker 10: global business community. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 10: years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation,
Speaker 10: followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we had to get Ursula final lying in there.
Speaker 2: The only other Ursula I've ever known was the uh Mermaid?
Speaker 2: Was that Ursula? Yeah? Okay, I didn't bet no. My
Speaker 2: mind was when I was a kid. It was Doctor No.
Speaker 2: And there was an actress who was a Bond's girl
Speaker 2: in Doctor No, the very first James Bond film. Her
Speaker 2: name was Ursula as well. It was Ursula. I think
Speaker 2: it's undressed or something. I used to call her Ursula
Speaker 2: undress because that was what she actually that was her
Speaker 2: role in the film was to undress. So the role
Speaker 2: of this Ursula is to lie. That's what she does
Speaker 2: all the time. Well, AI's goot a role. And uh,
Speaker 2: it is kind of interesting to watch these robots that
Speaker 2: are combined with AI. It really is horrific. Now AI
Speaker 2: can control a robot even if its legs get chainsawed off.
Speaker 2: They said, we built a robot brain that nothing can stop.
Speaker 2: It keeps adapting to whatever happens. So if this thing's
Speaker 2: coming after you, you blow the legs off, it'll keep
Speaker 2: moving to come after. Here is he changed us off
Speaker 2: the legs and the thing starts hobbling around on the
Speaker 2: nubs that it's got there, and it's going to still
Speaker 2: come after you, maybe not as well. Might saw it
Speaker 2: down a little bit, but it's going to keep counting,
Speaker 2: so it runs out of juice. Robots are being kicked, punched, shoved,
Speaker 2: even dragged by a chain around the neck. We're going
Speaker 2: to sign up for this job. You might get paid
Speaker 2: to do that instead of put in jail, all in
Speaker 2: an apparent effort to teach them how to adapt to
Speaker 2: the cruel physical world around them. In the latest instance
Speaker 2: of a robot being brutalized video making its rounds on
Speaker 2: social media. That you're seeing right there, says an engineer
Speaker 2: from a startup called Skilled AI, taking a chainsaw to
Speaker 2: the limbs of a robot dog. We built a robot
Speaker 2: brain that nothing can stop, shattered limbs, jammed motors. If
Speaker 2: the bot can move, the brain will move it, even
Speaker 2: if it's an entirely new robot body. The video is
Speaker 2: disconcerting as it is impressive, showing the effectiveness of AI
Speaker 2: that can seemingly be dropped into pretty much any robot body,
Speaker 2: even a severely mutilated one, and still adapt and move
Speaker 2: even with all of its four limbs lopped off, the
Speaker 2: robodog starts to hobble around almost immediately, albeit in a
Speaker 2: less dignified way. We created a universe with one hundred
Speaker 2: thousand different robots and trained our AI to control them all.
Speaker 2: To the company, we were often surprised with its ability
Speaker 2: to adapt to scenarios that are very different from what
Speaker 2: it saw at training time. The company showed off its
Speaker 2: new robot brain's ability to respond to a variety of
Speaker 2: different scenarios such as a loss of limbs, broken legs,
Speaker 2: jamm wheels, are being forced to walk on stilts. You
Speaker 2: saw that there as well.
Speaker 4: What I want to know is can it survive being
Speaker 4: crushed by hydraulic press and then chopped into molten.
Speaker 2: We should try that soon. I think the opportunity for
Speaker 2: that's coming up. I guess when they at leash on us. Well,
Speaker 2: there are more robots working in China than in the
Speaker 2: rest of the world combined. But the way that they
Speaker 2: define these robots is not like that. It's not these
Speaker 2: autonomous killer robots or police dogs whatever. This is really
Speaker 2: interest seeing that picture there from the New York Times.
Speaker 2: What they're really talking about are the robots that have
Speaker 2: been around for a long time. The robot arms that
Speaker 2: are connected to a base that are going to be
Speaker 2: welding parts on an automobile assembly line or something like that.
Speaker 2: These are not the things that we have to worry
Speaker 2: about unless you get in there while this thing is working.
Speaker 2: The just recently had somebody that was killed by one
Speaker 2: of those robot arms.
Speaker 3: Where is so concerned for safety. If you've ever seen
Speaker 3: a factory video coming out of immediately scroll away from
Speaker 3: them because I know what's about to happen. They're almost
Speaker 3: always some kind of horrific somebody losing their life because
Speaker 3: the Chinese just do not care. Yeah, they have such
Speaker 3: a massive excess population that you lose one factory worker,
Speaker 3: well who cares, You're gonna need another one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And the government's got an invested interest in the company,
Speaker 2: so they're not going to shut it down for some
Speaker 2: kind of a violation like that. China has embarked on
Speaker 2: a campaign to use more robot in its factories, transforming
Speaker 2: its manufacturing industries and becoming the dominant maker. The whole
Speaker 2: idea of using these biped robots and the factories is
Speaker 2: just to go the final inch to getting this thing
Speaker 2: fully automated. You know, they'll be able to do some
Speaker 2: things in terms of moving material around that make it
Speaker 2: a little bit more difficult for some of these other,
Speaker 2: maybe more highly specialized robots. But that's what it's really about.
Speaker 2: And as I said, they're not going to bring they're
Speaker 2: not going to onshore manufacturing unless they can do it
Speaker 2: to replace workers with robots. What you say, Lance, I just.
Speaker 4: Saw something about these robot arms and the massive amount
Speaker 4: of planned obsolescence that is put into them. They have
Speaker 4: things like their operating system is primarily stored in volatile
Speaker 4: memory that's kept active with a battery that isn't recharged.
Speaker 4: So after a few years that dies and you lose
Speaker 4: your entire operating system. You have to contact them if
Speaker 4: you want to keep using your arm, to have a
Speaker 4: actual technician come out to fix it. So a ton
Speaker 4: of these robot arms wind up in auctions really cheap.
Speaker 2: That's interesting, well, to repurpose that thing. They don't want
Speaker 2: to have workers. That's very clear, and that's just as
Speaker 2: true of our people as it is of China. Factories
Speaker 2: in China installed nearly three hundred thousand new robots last year,
Speaker 2: more than the rest of the world combined, America and
Speaker 2: factories installed thirty four thousand, so they're doing about ten
Speaker 2: times the number we are. While Chinese factories have been
Speaker 2: using more robots, they've also gotten better at making them.
Speaker 2: The government has used public capital and policy directives to
Speaker 2: spur Chinese companies to become leaders in robotics. Well, they
Speaker 2: better hope that they're better on investing their money in
Speaker 2: robotics than they did in terms of real estate and construction.
Speaker 2: You see the pictures on YouTube. You can find them
Speaker 2: on YouTube, These vast cities and developments that have just
Speaker 2: been left and abandoned. I mean, you have these amazing
Speaker 2: mansions that have been built in some places, and some
Speaker 2: of these guys will go in and there's just a
Speaker 2: little bit of security that's there, but not much, and
Speaker 2: they'll sneak into these buildings which are now being overgrown
Speaker 2: with vines and mildew and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And they truly were unbelievable mansions that they built and
Speaker 2: malinvestment that they've had there. Because that's what governments always do.
Speaker 2: China has just taken all of these issues to the
Speaker 2: most radical extreme that we've ever seen before. Worldwide robots
Speaker 2: and AI are playing an increasingly prominent disruptive role in manufacturing.
Speaker 2: Factory robots range from machines that can weld car parks
Speaker 2: together to claws that lift boxes onto conveyor belts. Factories
Speaker 2: in China have installed more than one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand robots each year since twenty seventeen, so that's eight
Speaker 2: years of that. The manufacturing output has therefore ballooned, and
Speaker 2: by the start of this year, factories in China were
Speaker 2: making nearly a third of all manufactured goods worldwide. They
Speaker 2: make more manufactured goods than the United States, Germany, and Japan,
Speaker 2: South Korea and Britain combined, and it's only going to
Speaker 2: get more so that way, because they have now been
Speaker 2: given exclusive access to cheap energy that is not going
Speaker 2: to be available in any of those other countries. Overall,
Speaker 2: China has five times as med robots and factories as
Speaker 2: the United States. The Federation's data does not include humanoid robots.
Speaker 2: The humanoids startup unitary robotics. The latest space of humanoid
Speaker 2: robots are priced at about six thousand dollars in China.
Speaker 2: By the way, Lance, do you have that clip that
Speaker 2: you showed me of the robots that were boxing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's in the deck on the second row.
Speaker 2: Okay, let me see if I find Oh yeah, watch this,
Speaker 2: folks talk about the future of robotics. Here we are
Speaker 2: a couple of robots walking around. They got boxing gloves
Speaker 2: on and their head is protected. I watched the way
Speaker 2: that they fight, especially this blue one. The other one
Speaker 2: is itching for a fight. He's he's doing threatening moves,
Speaker 2: but the bluee is just kind of roaming around like
Speaker 2: a toddler and he runs over, walks past. The guy
Speaker 2: doesn't engage in him. The other robot.
Speaker 4: This was a Chinese robot fighting event.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The one that's in the red starts swinging in
Speaker 2: the air, you know, air boxing, and he falls on
Speaker 2: the ground as he's swinging and now he can't get up. Help.
Speaker 4: Blue one starts raising his arms in celebration when the
Speaker 4: red one falls down.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: That rodeo that we went to, I told you about
Speaker 2: several times. So they had. We used to go to
Speaker 2: a weekly rodeo in Simonton, Texas that was outside of
Speaker 2: Houston and uh, and it was a lot of fun.
Speaker 2: They had the same animals week after week and some
Speaker 2: of the same cowboys, but mostly the cowboys changed, but
Speaker 2: the animals I kept the same. And one time, the
Speaker 2: very first they would always have the wild bull riding
Speaker 2: at the very began and at the very end. That's
Speaker 2: put it into two parts, because that was the most
Speaker 2: amazing thing I guess that they had. And so they
Speaker 2: were about to start the event, and they had this
Speaker 2: really really tiny, skinny cowboy that was out there and
Speaker 2: he was sting the gate, and that robot reminded me
Speaker 2: of him. He's out there, he's got like he's crouched
Speaker 2: like he's riding a horse or something, and he's going yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: and arm up in the air, and we looked at him.
Speaker 2: We all just started rolling laughing in the stadium, and
Speaker 2: that he was the first one out of the gate,
Speaker 2: and unfortunately he was not somebody who was a real
Speaker 2: cowboy or whatever. The gate opens, the bull takes one
Speaker 2: leap and he goes flying off immediately. The problem is
Speaker 2: that it happened so quickly that the clowns couldn't get
Speaker 2: there distract the bull. The bull just pivots immediately and
Speaker 2: slams him head to head. He was up against the
Speaker 2: wooden wall there and just smashed him, you know, head
Speaker 2: to head and back, and then the and then the
Speaker 2: clowns arrive and distracted me, turns away. The guy was
Speaker 2: setting up and he just fell over. And I don't
Speaker 2: know how seriously that guy was hurt. I mean, he
Speaker 2: didn't regain consciousness. Then they took him out. That was
Speaker 2: the first event of that rodeo event. But whenever I
Speaker 2: see something like that, I always think that guy, I
Speaker 2: hate that that happened to him, But it certainly was
Speaker 2: funny to watch him warming up.
Speaker 3: I've always heard that, you know, being knocked unconscious is
Speaker 3: very much not like it is in the films. If
Speaker 3: you're unconscious, generally it means there's brain injury bring from.
Speaker 3: It's not just like, oh, you know, you'll be fine.
Speaker 3: The longer you're unconscious, the more likely it means something
Speaker 3: is seriously wrong and there's going to be problems.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he had I'm sure a severe fracture. I
Speaker 2: mean that I just can't even imagine what happened to him.
Speaker 2: But I was watching him warm up. That was still funny.
Speaker 2: I think it'll laugh about that. I'm not laughing about
Speaker 2: his injury. If you were to assemble a really top
Speaker 2: notch humanoid robot, it would almost be completely non China made,
Speaker 2: said one expert. Mister Sue Hi, my name is Sue.
Speaker 2: How do you do as you Maybe it would have
Speaker 2: one or two Chinese components, but by and large the
Speaker 2: entire system would be very international. But when it comes
Speaker 2: to factory robots, China has multiple advantages large numbers of
Speaker 2: skilled electricians and specialized computer programmers who can install these robots,
Speaker 2: they said. So scientists are warning as we look at
Speaker 2: all this, the robotics, the AI labs and the rest
Speaker 2: of this. We've got a couple of scientists making the
Speaker 2: rounds saying AI is so dangerous that company countries need
Speaker 2: to start making plans about how they're going to bomb
Speaker 2: these facilities when it goes bad, you know, like the
Speaker 2: Colossus that Elon Musk is building a Memphis that he
Speaker 2: named after this dystopian sci fi film where the computer
Speaker 2: tried to take over the world. So these guys have
Speaker 2: worked in this industry for quite some time, and they said,
Speaker 2: we need to have a backup plan. We're going to
Speaker 2: destroy these data centers once this thing gets out of control.
Speaker 2: Because they feel like it's not an if but a
Speaker 2: when question.
Speaker 3: I like how their solution is well, when it goes
Speaker 3: out of control, we're gonna need to blow up. So
Speaker 3: I'm gonna start playing for that instead of we should
Speaker 3: stop right here before we.
Speaker 2: Get there exactly. Yeah, good luck with that.
Speaker 4: Well they should call it the torment next. Be as
Speaker 4: honest as you can.
Speaker 3: Be, fidget guy, Thank you very much, says meet the
Speaker 3: new boss Robot Dog save as the old boss Freemason Constable. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right, Christian cont social conservatives, says David, I disagree
Speaker 3: with you. It is not the war on drugs that
Speaker 3: has causes tobacle. It is the war on our culture, morals,
Speaker 3: and ethics. We not be so infested with drug addicts.
Speaker 2: Well, I don't think we disagree. I have said all along,
Speaker 2: and I'll tell you what I've interviewed, had many interviews
Speaker 2: with law enforcement against prohibitions organization called LEAP, that's their acronym,
Speaker 2: and they don't believe that it's a law enforcement issue.
Speaker 2: They say it's a spiritual issue. And I've said that
Speaker 2: all along. I said, addiction is a spiritual issue. You're
Speaker 2: not going to approach that or alcohol use or anything
Speaker 2: else like that. That's always a spiritual issue and you
Speaker 2: can't fix it. With government force. It's like this thing,
Speaker 2: you know, the only tool that you've got is a hammer.
Speaker 2: Everything looks like a nail, so you go around beating
Speaker 2: up everything and breaking everything. And those are the people
Speaker 2: who think that the solution to the war on drug
Speaker 2: the solution to addiction and all the societal ills that
Speaker 2: we have is government force. It's not. And so I
Speaker 2: think we're on the same side here the way out
Speaker 2: of this. It's one of the things that I used
Speaker 2: to say my friends. I had friends when I was
Speaker 2: an engineering that would use drugs or had use drugs,
Speaker 2: and one day they were talking about it, and I said,
Speaker 2: you know, I really don't like the war on drugs
Speaker 2: and I hate what is happening with it. And this
Speaker 2: was in let's see somewhere between nineteen eighty three and
Speaker 2: eighty six, I don't know which year, but it's when
Speaker 2: I was working at Data General, and I said, I
Speaker 2: have been in bands, I've been in you know, college,
Speaker 2: all these different things. I said, I've never once had
Speaker 2: a person even offer drugs to me, even though I've
Speaker 2: been in places where people are taking drugs. I said,
Speaker 2: I don't think that we need the government to stop
Speaker 2: us from doing that and they started laughing. And that's
Speaker 2: what you're laughing about it. They said, they probably thought
Speaker 2: you were a nark. That's why they didn't offer any
Speaker 2: drugs because I was always you know, it's not about
Speaker 2: these external things. The issues are internal. And if people
Speaker 2: have a hole in themselves so they can't fill because
Speaker 2: they've taken Christ out of it, then they're going to
Speaker 2: turn to some artificial things like that, and there's not
Speaker 2: anything the government's going to do to fix that. Think
Speaker 2: you all have a great weekend.
Speaker 3: See it next.
Speaker 2: The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common past, track and control us.
Speaker 2: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God.
Speaker 4: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want to.
Speaker 2: Please share the information and links you'll find at Ddavidnightshow
Speaker 2: dot com. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing.
Speaker 2: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 2: your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com