Speaker 1: Make us your number one precent for instant access to
Speaker 1: your world. Couldn't live without its fifty five KRC, the
Speaker 1: talk station five oh five at the five k r
Speaker 1: C the Talking Station. Happy Tuesday, some sense day will
Speaker 1: a vacation.
Speaker 2: I'm the dude man, and I'm not.
Speaker 1: I am Brian Thomas, and I hope you're eving a
Speaker 1: happy Tuesday. Try to make it such if you are
Speaker 1: not currently having one. I was feel little bit of
Speaker 1: malaysed yesterday, even pointed that on Facebook and thanks to
Speaker 1: all the kind of people who are wish me well.
Speaker 1: I don't know, LA is a weird thing, man. Just
Speaker 1: a lot of problems in the world and you struggle
Speaker 1: to try to cope with them and deal with them.
Speaker 1: And there's no answer to so many the things you
Speaker 1: have to cope with in this life. It can get
Speaker 1: you down. And I think coming off vacation also added
Speaker 1: to that. But we'll see if we can't muddle through today.
Speaker 1: I got some great guests lined up. Thank you to
Speaker 1: Joe Strekker, second producer of the fifty five Carse Morning
Speaker 1: Show and liner upper of Guesters. Dave Williams Taxpayer Protection
Speaker 1: Lines joins us at seven oh five, here's a topic
Speaker 1: Congress utter disregard for fiscal responsibility. How many decades we've
Speaker 1: been talking about that. I'm not quite sure which direction
Speaker 1: Dave's going to go on that one, but we have
Speaker 1: a multitude of possibilities for that general subject matter. Also,
Speaker 1: you need to extend Trump tax cuts and let's make
Speaker 1: it permanent this time. That would require Congress down the
Speaker 1: road to actually vote to increase taxes. It's one thing
Speaker 1: I always hate about these. You know, when you adjust taxes,
Speaker 1: it's just for a limited time and thus requiring Congressional
Speaker 1: action when the time period ends, and of course period's
Speaker 1: coming up to a close, and everybody's screaming about it,
Speaker 1: needing to extend them. Those tax cuts benefit everybody. Don't
Speaker 1: believe the Left that these are just tax cuts for
Speaker 1: the wealthy. That just drives me crazy. Here that repeated
Speaker 1: over and over and over and over again, stirring that
Speaker 1: whole class warfare pot just constantly. It's like they're one
Speaker 1: trick pony class warfare. Steve Gooden are Legal expert returns
Speaker 1: at seven thirty. Great to have Steve on. He can
Speaker 1: explain what the hell's going on with the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: and this decision on the then as well and prisoners.
Speaker 1: And I know it's a temporary thing and involves evidence,
Speaker 1: and you know what's going on in the lower courts,
Speaker 1: what hasn't been done in the lower courts. But that's
Speaker 1: why we have Steve. He brings clarity to otherwise confusing
Speaker 1: situations going on in the area of law today, Venezuelan
Speaker 1: prisoners and the law. So seven thirty for Steve Gooden.
Speaker 1: Always enjoy having him on the program. Today is Tuesday
Speaker 1: Ergo the Inside Scoop with bright Bart News. Today we
Speaker 1: get Texas Border Associate editor Bob Price to talk about
Speaker 1: MS thirteen gang members more rights than Americans apparently. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and we have a Democratic judge resigning after harboring a
Speaker 1: gang member in his home, which is a really bizarre story.
Speaker 1: Somebody wrote wtf at the top of it. Oh, that
Speaker 1: was me, new Mexican Democrat judge. They actually had a
Speaker 1: trendy Aragua gang member living in their home and the
Speaker 1: guy was you know, he filmed himself with automatic weapons
Speaker 1: on the range and apparently their daughter has automatic weapons
Speaker 1: and let this guy use them. It is absolutely badcrap
Speaker 1: in saying bizarre mate may have to touch upon the
Speaker 1: details on that one before we get to Bob Price
Speaker 1: at eight oh five. But wow, strange things. And then
Speaker 1: of course it is Tuesday, so we get the Daniel
Speaker 1: Davis deep dive retired to Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis talking
Speaker 1: about the latest in Ukraine Russia. Yeah, well the fighting
Speaker 1: has resumed, the end of the Eastern Truce and you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know it was the reminder of World War Two.
Speaker 1: Wasn't there a period of time of World War two
Speaker 1: at Christmas time when a World War One? Rather when
Speaker 1: they had a ceasefire that went for like a day
Speaker 1: or something, And I recall hearing stories about you know,
Speaker 1: folks from both sides of the trenches, you know, to
Speaker 1: meeting and is sitting down and sharing at least a
Speaker 1: moment of peace, you know, having a smoke together, you know,
Speaker 1: the Brits on one side of the French and the
Speaker 1: Germans on the other, and they stopped fighting for some
Speaker 1: small period of time and actually cross the lines and
Speaker 1: engage in some measure of humanity together, which really illustrates
Speaker 1: the bizarre reality of war, doesn't it that you are
Speaker 1: actually literally trying to kill someone across the line that
Speaker 1: you have no connection with and if you pause for
Speaker 1: a moment and you agree that you neither of you
Speaker 1: are going to try to kill each other, you actually
Speaker 1: find you've got something in common. Well, that's what the
Speaker 1: Eastern Truce was all about. I don't know if they
Speaker 1: sat down and broke bread together, the Russians and the Ukrainians,
Speaker 1: but they did stop fighting, although of Zelensky argued that
Speaker 1: the Russians didn't completely stop fighting, but Putin did declare
Speaker 1: yesterday that it's over. He said, our attitude to cease
Speaker 1: Fars is positive, and that's why we proposed the initiative,
Speaker 1: especially as it was during the Holy Easter days. We've
Speaker 1: seen the initial reaction from Kiev, as I believe everyone
Speaker 1: did this sentiment, characterize our proposal as playing with lives
Speaker 1: and so on, and it's bizarre, isn't it. And when
Speaker 1: you step back from it, that because of the Easter
Speaker 1: holiday you would stop trying to kill each other, it's
Speaker 1: very Christian sentiment. But the moment midnight hits and it's
Speaker 1: not Easter anymore, that's when you start killing each other again.
Speaker 1: I I'm sorry, I war just so oftentimes doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense to me anyhow, accountability has returned to student loans. Oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, if you want to call five one, three, seven, four,
Speaker 1: nine fifty, five hundred, eight hundred and eighty two to
Speaker 1: three Taco with ton five fifty on AT and T phones,
Speaker 1: you know I enjoy hearing from the listeners. Anyway, little
Speaker 1: bit man, Education secretary, They're coming for your student loans
Speaker 1: no longer freebie. President Biden never had the authority to
Speaker 1: forgive student loans across the board, as the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: held in twenty twenty three, she writes in an open letter.
Speaker 1: But for political gain, he dangled the cart of loan
Speaker 1: forgiveness in front of young voters, among other things, by
Speaker 1: keeping in place a temporary COVID era deferment program. Thus,
Speaker 1: the Education Department allowed students to rack up massive debt
Speaker 1: that is now long past two. Between twenty one and
Speaker 1: twenty four, federal student loan debt increase by more than
Speaker 1: sixty billion dollars annually, while the department manipulated repayment plans
Speaker 1: and forgiveness policies until only thirty eight percent of student
Speaker 1: loan portfolio was in repayment. This is unsustainable for both
Speaker 1: students and underscore taxpayers. I am announcing the end of
Speaker 1: this dishonest and irresponsible policy. We will confirm the Department's
Speaker 1: repayment options to federal court decisions and end the Biden
Speaker 1: era practice of zero interests, zero accountability forbearances that are
Speaker 1: pushing borrowers into loan delinquency and default. On May fifth,
Speaker 1: we will begin the process of moving roughly one point
Speaker 1: eight million borrowers into repayment plans and restart collections of
Speaker 1: loans in default. Borrowers who don't make payments on time,
Speaker 1: we'll see their credit scores go down and in some
Speaker 1: cases their wage wages automatically garnished. Why not, because we
Speaker 1: want to be unkind to student borrowers. Borrowing money and
Speaker 1: failing to pay it back isn't a victimless offense. Debt
Speaker 1: doesn't go away, It gets transferred to others. If borrowers
Speaker 1: don't pay their debts to the government, taxpayers do. And
Speaker 1: let that sink in. Everybody out there who didn't go
Speaker 1: into debt and get a college education. That's more people
Speaker 1: than those who did. You're the ones that are going
Speaker 1: to be shouldering the burden of this. Is that fair
Speaker 1: to you? She goes on student loans must always be
Speaker 1: paid back because they are unlike other types of consumer loans.
Speaker 1: If borrowers stop paying a mortgage or a car payment,
Speaker 1: he would go into foreclosure or find his car repossessed.
Speaker 1: Student loans have no collateral. It's impossible to repossess a
Speaker 1: college degree. That's why they are very rarely discharged even
Speaker 1: in bankruptcy. That's the hard truth for borrowers. But I
Speaker 1: have another hard truth for the institutions that made empty
Speaker 1: promises to students while pocketing their loan dollars. Here's the
Speaker 1: good part. Colleges and universities call themselves nonprofits, but for
Speaker 1: years they have profited massively off the federal subsidy of loans,
Speaker 1: hiking tuition and piling up multi billion dollar endowments while
Speaker 1: students graduate six figures in the red. A widely cited
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen study found that for every dollar of increased
Speaker 1: federal caps on subsidized loans, colleges raised tuition by sixty cents.
Speaker 1: Many of the degree granting programs that qualify for student
Speaker 1: loans are worthless on the job market, but colleges continue
Speaker 1: to accept students to these programs and encourage them to
Speaker 1: borrow to pay for them. Accountability is a two way street.
Speaker 1: As we pushed to hold student borrowers to account, we
Speaker 1: will also push colleges to be responsible and transparent. If
Speaker 1: you're a student borrower with a federal loan balance, then
Speaker 1: haven't been making payments. You must restart payments now. Our
Speaker 1: Federal Student Aid Office is providing every form of assistance
Speaker 1: we legally can to ensure that a monthly payment can
Speaker 1: fit into your budget. We recently extend the FSA call
Speaker 1: center operation with weekend hours to ensure that your individual
Speaker 1: questions can be answered. We're also updating the Loans Simulator
Speaker 1: to help calculate your easier repayment plan. We also provided
Speaker 1: an advanced AI Assistant Aiden to help pinpoint your best
Speaker 1: financial strategy. As we plan for the department's future, we
Speaker 1: won't leave the loan portfolio and disarray. We are committed
Speaker 1: to ensuring that borrowers are paying back their loans, that
Speaker 1: they are fully supported in doing so, and that colleges
Speaker 1: can't create such a massive liability for students and their families,
Speaker 1: jeopardizing their ability to achieve the American dream. Bis McMahon,
Speaker 1: US Education Secretary, And isn't that really a great point
Speaker 1: she makes on the colleges that encourage this. They don't
Speaker 1: sit down with you ahead of time and say, you
Speaker 1: know what this degree you're pursuing in humanities or sociology
Speaker 1: or fill in the blank, political science. I'll make fun
Speaker 1: of myself with my own undergraduate degree. But then again,
Speaker 1: I didn't plan on being a political scientist. They use
Speaker 1: that as a vehicle to get to law school. I
Speaker 1: don't know what I would have done with it. I've
Speaker 1: said that before. Then again, I went to the University
Speaker 1: of Cincinnati, which was not costing my parents fifty sixty
Speaker 1: seventy thousand dollars a year. And thank god to my parents,
Speaker 1: as I always give them credit for a well getting
Speaker 1: me an education. But in the final analysis, wouldn't it
Speaker 1: have been a nice prudent thing to do to sit
Speaker 1: down and say, wait a second, what are you going
Speaker 1: to do with this degree? Just getting a you know,
Speaker 1: the sheepskin hanging on the wall does not guarantee you employment.
Speaker 1: Is there a demand for or the degree that you're getting.
Speaker 1: Have a fair analysis of that guide students in the
Speaker 1: proper direction. It's like something that you know, I'm hoping
Speaker 1: that is brought back to K through twelve education, which
Speaker 1: is simple home economics, not maybe not balancing a checkbook
Speaker 1: anymore since electronics do all that. But I've actually, you know,
Speaker 1: discussing budgeting money in versus money going out, how to
Speaker 1: maybe not rack up a credit card bill, simple day
Speaker 1: to day principles, logic and reason that you will apply
Speaker 1: in your life. You can have this similar discussion with
Speaker 1: regard to pursuing a college education. First off, what do
Speaker 1: you want to do and what are you going to
Speaker 1: do with a degree when you get it? Is there
Speaker 1: a demand out there in the world for the degree
Speaker 1: you're pursuing and if there isn't, maybe you don't want
Speaker 1: to go down that road. But it's a great point
Speaker 1: also that you can't revot the college degree. I mean
Speaker 1: there is no collateral there, loose lending standards pursuing degrees
Speaker 1: of little to no value, which means, you know, as
Speaker 1: a barista, you may not be able to discharge your
Speaker 1: two hundred thousand dollars college debt. So anyway, bring it
Speaker 1: some accountability back, which I welcome that. I don't know
Speaker 1: how you feel about it, Maybe you feel differently. You
Speaker 1: can feel free to call it's five eighteen right now,
Speaker 1: be back after these brief words.
Speaker 3: When something makes.
Speaker 4: You say what social Security accounts belonging to people listed
Speaker 4: over one hundred and twenty years old.
Speaker 5: When something makes you say why eight million dollars for
Speaker 5: making mice transgender?
Speaker 1: When someone makes you say who?
Speaker 6: No one lacks violence, but sometimes violence is necessary.
Speaker 7: When and where will you get the answers? Twenty four
Speaker 7: to seven, Paul, this is just crazy right here on
Speaker 7: fifty five krs the talk station there is your Channa
Speaker 7: nine first one to out of orgas. What do we
Speaker 7: got going on today? Partley botty skies turning mostly sunny
Speaker 7: at some point.
Speaker 1: Seventy two is going to be the high, down to
Speaker 1: fifty overnight with a few clouds, seventy eight with mostly
Speaker 1: sunny skies. Tomorrow a few clouds overnight, fifty for the low,
Speaker 1: and on Thursday mostly body day. Best chance of rain
Speaker 1: coming on Friday. There's a slight chance of rain Thursday
Speaker 1: seventy nine to high Thursday forty nine degrees. Right now,
Speaker 1: fifty five car CD talk station Flove twenty two fifty
Speaker 1: five cars talk station five one three seven four nine
Speaker 1: fifty five hundred eight hundred eight two three Talk five
Speaker 1: pay fifty on AT and T phone. Remember tonight it's
Speaker 1: the inside China today, the social political economic situation with
Speaker 1: Breitbart World editor Francis Martel. Talk with Francis yesterday about
Speaker 1: that fascinating reality. You know what we read in the
Speaker 1: papers isn't quite often the realite's real situation. Apparently things
Speaker 1: not great in China and nobody's having babies, no one's
Speaker 1: getting married. Uh. Economic situation people in the general suff
Speaker 1: there's that word again, malaisee, money, money with Brian James
Speaker 1: and Christopher Smith Ofman absolutely on fire yesterday. Boy, he
Speaker 1: was riled up, most notably about Marift have Purvoll violating
Speaker 1: the law and blocking the streets with the protest over
Speaker 1: the weekend protest over what a lot of anger in
Speaker 1: the Democrats side of the ledger, a whole lot of
Speaker 1: anger and just scratching my head over what specifically, And
Speaker 1: turning to Gallup, it's got a new poll out confidence
Speaker 1: rating for Democratic leadership in Congress now at twenty five percent,
Speaker 1: nine points below the previous low of thirty four percent,
Speaker 1: which is recorded in twenty twenty three. Contrast that with
Speaker 1: confidence Republican congressional leadership, which isn't you know exactly, you know,
Speaker 1: through the roof, But at least it's thirty nine percent,
Speaker 1: well above the twenty four percent low it hit back
Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen. According to the conclusions from Gallup Feeling,
Speaker 1: the drop in confidence in the Democratic congressional leadership were
Speaker 1: well Democrats. Gallup noted in the release of this poll,
Speaker 1: Democratic congressional leaders rating among their own party faithful has
Speaker 1: followen forty one points since last year to their lowest
Speaker 1: point ever. One might ask themselves why that might be.
Speaker 1: Maybe on the wrong side of a lot of the
Speaker 1: issues that really are important to Americans. I know, White
Speaker 1: House Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt having a go at Democratic
Speaker 1: Senator Chris van Holland because well, he went to Al
Speaker 1: Salvador to meet with the deported illegal immigrant gang member
Speaker 1: and wife, Peter apparently, and pointed out that that trip
Speaker 1: was in fact paid by you, the American taxpayer. So
Speaker 1: if you're working today, hey, this is what you work
Speaker 1: for days in our country, illegally MS thirteen gang member
Speaker 1: reported by his wife to be a wife beater, which
Speaker 1: anybody listens to my program knows. I have a certain detest,
Speaker 1: I mean, really strong, strong anger and resentment and hatred
Speaker 1: toward wife beaters and abusers. They're one notch below child
Speaker 1: molesters in my mind, she pointed out yesterday and Fox,
Speaker 1: he is an illegal alien, a foreign tourist, terrorist, and
Speaker 1: criminal MS thirteen gang member who violated our country's loss
Speaker 1: by coming here in the first place. Now, how is
Speaker 1: it and why is it that the Democrats seems so
Speaker 1: interested and desirous of bringing him back into our country.
Speaker 1: It seems to such an a strange position to take.
Speaker 1: She pointed out, there was a litany of evidence providing
Speaker 1: approving Garcia's ties to the gang. It had been confirmed
Speaker 1: by two different courts and by multiple law enforcement officers
Speaker 1: that he's a gang member. This is who the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is advocating for. It's ridiculous. That's her point, and
Speaker 1: that seems to be my conclusion as well, And that
Speaker 1: may serve to explain on some level the Gallup poll numbers.
Speaker 1: It's defending the indefensible. It's like being angry at dose
Speaker 1: for pointing out that we're paying for, you know, transgender
Speaker 1: mice surgery or something like that. I mean, there's a
Speaker 1: million little things you can point to, and they're angry
Speaker 1: about that. I don't know. Listen, it's not my party.
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to defend the indefensible. Five on three
Speaker 1: seventy eight two to three dogs Zimmer. That's a great
Speaker 1: company to call for HVAC needs, Zimmer heating and air conditioning.
Speaker 1: They're outstanding of what they do. Customer service is great.
Speaker 1: Then around three generations, more than seventy five years making
Speaker 1: Cincinnati area home safe, efficient and comfortable. And right now,
Speaker 1: if you need a new unit HVAC unit, it's a
Speaker 1: perfect time to get in touch with Carrier because you
Speaker 1: can save up to fifteen hundred and fifty dollars on
Speaker 1: a new Carrier comfort system. It's a great Then Carrier
Speaker 1: makes a great system and at fifteen hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: dollars savings, that's real money. So you can confidently call
Speaker 1: the folks at Zimmer. They do wonderful work. Customer service
Speaker 1: couldn't be better. Chris Zimmer can be reached at five
Speaker 1: one three five two one ninety eight ninety three. That's
Speaker 1: five one three five two one ninety eight ninety three online.
Speaker 1: Just go to go Zimmer dot com fifty five KRC
Speaker 1: dot com. In this edition of the market there's your
Speaker 1: channeline with a four k ass partly cloudy sky's today
Speaker 1: turning mostly sonny. Seventy two for the high, nine to
Speaker 1: fifty overnight with a few clowns seventy eight. Mostly sunny
Speaker 1: tomorrow overnight low fifty again with a few clowns, and
Speaker 1: on Thursday and mostly clotty day with a slight chancer.
Speaker 1: Rank seventy nine for the high. Let's see, it's forty
Speaker 1: nine degrees right now. If you about CARCD talk stations
Speaker 1: by thirty man fifty about CARCD talk station I mentioned,
Speaker 1: fifty about carse dot com, get the podcast, especially smooth
Speaker 1: them in yesterday. Don't forget your iHeartMedia app while you're there.
Speaker 1: See you can stream the content wherever you happen to
Speaker 1: be and give me a call if you'd like. Five
Speaker 1: one three, seven four nine fifty eight two three. Talk
Speaker 1: rather talk with you than do local stories, So let's
Speaker 1: do that. Joey's calling. Hey Joey, thanks for calling this morning.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the show.
Speaker 8: Hi, how are you doing today?
Speaker 1: I am doing okay. I hope you can say at
Speaker 1: least that much.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, no doubt.
Speaker 9: I'm on my way to work and I'm grateful I
Speaker 9: got a job.
Speaker 1: Amen.
Speaker 8: Hey, I just wanted to kind of draw a picture here,
Speaker 8: what's going on with this guy from a salvad Or.
Speaker 8: The Democrats all along have been salivating an opportunity with
Speaker 8: the deportation to pick, and they weren't and.
Speaker 10: They'll probably be a couple more, but to pick.
Speaker 8: And find a poster child so that they can run
Speaker 8: with that and put that out from all American people
Speaker 8: that believe they're nonsense due to the fact that the.
Speaker 3: Media lies and illustrates so.
Speaker 11: Well for them.
Speaker 10: So what happened. They just hastily picked.
Speaker 3: The wrong guy.
Speaker 8: They're not going to back down, because they don't. They
Speaker 8: will look you in the space and lie to you
Speaker 8: over anything, all of them will, and stick with it.
Speaker 10: And twist and turn and camouflage their narrative. If you're
Speaker 10: not paying attention, you're going to believe it. But they
Speaker 10: just picked the wrong one.
Speaker 8: They're not going to back down, and they'n't pick a
Speaker 8: couple more.
Speaker 10: And they might find because there is human error at.
Speaker 8: All, these people that got to go back, they might
Speaker 8: find where they make a mistake, and they'll find that
Speaker 8: perfect seventeen year old that looks like he's twenty.
Speaker 9: Something, and they'll make a martyr out of him.
Speaker 10: There, they'll be a couple of more.
Speaker 4: They be a good.
Speaker 8: Minor, really tug at people's heart strings what we're doing
Speaker 8: to the children, And they just picked the wrong guy,
Speaker 8: and you're not.
Speaker 4: Gonna let it go.
Speaker 8: And as for the senator, this moron, I'll be careful here.
Speaker 8: He's gonna be the next Gavin Nowsan. I think this
Speaker 8: jack ass just wants to position himself to be the
Speaker 8: next coming. And look what he's done to run for president.
Speaker 8: That's what I think. I don't even know why I ask,
Speaker 8: because they'll be easy to be destroyed, But I think that's.
Speaker 9: What's going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it's in this student observation. You're right,
Speaker 1: it was. It was sort of ready fire aim with
Speaker 1: them selecting this El Salvador or this this gang member
Speaker 1: to be the bridge or the hill upon which they die.
Speaker 1: But yeah, you're right, and they won't admit error and
Speaker 1: they won't back down, and it just makes them look
Speaker 1: worse and worse because the more information that comes out,
Speaker 1: the more this gets talked about, the more people become
Speaker 1: aware that he has already been identified at two courts
Speaker 1: of law, as an MS thirteen gang member, that his
Speaker 1: wife did report him to the police for being a
Speaker 1: wife beater, and that there's nothing and nothing at all
Speaker 1: that is redeemable about this person's character, and that he
Speaker 1: did come into our country illegally in the first place.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's one of the weirdest elements of this.
Speaker 1: He was in here, he came in illegally. He's an
Speaker 1: illegal alien, and we're trying to bring him back into
Speaker 1: the country. They're facilitating like it's a second act of
Speaker 1: lawbreaking by you know, we get him out and then
Speaker 1: they'll bring him back in what so he can go
Speaker 1: through a deportation hearing and then get chucked out again,
Speaker 1: which is really, in the final analysis, exactly what would happen.
Speaker 1: So it's just that's what makes this all crazy. But yeah,
Speaker 1: you're right, there will be another one. This isn't the
Speaker 1: only one. They will find somebody who has been perhaps
Speaker 1: wrongfully deported, perhaps and then they'll make that the next
Speaker 1: poster child. But in the grand scheme of things, I mean,
Speaker 1: here's a really an interesting fact. Given the number of
Speaker 1: border crossings, get a load of the difference between President
Speaker 1: Biden's border policies and Trump's porter policies one and eighty
Speaker 1: nine thousand, six hundred and four, which are the number
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants border patrol agents caught and released into
Speaker 1: the United States in one month. That will be December
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three. Again, the number one hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: nine thousand, six hundred and four one single month. The
Speaker 1: number of illegal immigrants agents caught and released in the
Speaker 1: United States in February twenty twenty five twenty. Has there
Speaker 1: been a new law put on the books?
Speaker 9: Nope?
Speaker 1: Did we need a new law put on the books? Nope.
Speaker 1: I remember them screaming their heads off about Donald Oh,
Speaker 1: it's Donald Trump's fault that we didn't get immigration reform.
Speaker 1: We the immigration reform bill, not even reform, basically solidified
Speaker 1: and codified into law. Biden's bought open border policy and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was not in office at the time that
Speaker 1: that thing got shot down. The Republicans in Congress decided
Speaker 1: they didn't want to advance it because it would basically,
Speaker 1: you know, memorialized Biden's open border policies. It was a
Speaker 1: nonsensical bill in the first place, but they got all
Speaker 1: up in arms and riled up about it. Well, there's
Speaker 1: nothing we can do about it without a new piece
Speaker 1: of legislation. Nonsense. Donald Trump comes in office and look
Speaker 1: twenty Caughton released in one month versus one eighty nine,
Speaker 1: six hundred and four again in December twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: one month. And this possibility with that vast quantity of
Speaker 1: numbers and we've heard numbers between ten and twenty million
Speaker 1: during the Biden administration and illegally coming into our country. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there may very well be someone in that mix who
Speaker 1: goes through some sort of deportation process who is wrongfully deported,
Speaker 1: and that person, that loan individual, become the next poster
Speaker 1: child for the Democrats to stream and cry about. But
Speaker 1: what about the other what ten million or more people
Speaker 1: that aren't supposed to be here and have no justifiable
Speaker 1: legal basis to stay in the country. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: demonizing the entire police department because yeah, there's a bad
Speaker 1: egg in there. Go to work today. I don't care
Speaker 1: how big your building is or how many people work there.
Speaker 1: I bet there's one bad egg among all the other
Speaker 1: folks in your office that do great work. There's a
Speaker 1: bad one in there. Thus is life, Thus is society.
Speaker 1: Thus it has ever been mistakes can be made, and
Speaker 1: they are made, they can be undone, and they can
Speaker 1: be fixed. But when the Democrats get a hold of
Speaker 1: something like this, it's as if every single act, every
Speaker 1: single effort, is all bad, it's all demonized, it's all wrong,
Speaker 1: and that's just nonsense. By thirty seven fifty five Carcy
Speaker 1: Detalk Station QC. Kinetics not nonsense. It's to help get
Speaker 1: rid of your pain. You get our thrtis pain, you've
Speaker 1: been seeing the doctor. I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: that go to the doctor because our theright is pain.
Speaker 1: Maybe it hurts why you're in bed, Maybe it hurts
Speaker 1: when you put your feet down on the floor. Maybe
Speaker 1: you can't walk the dog, maybe you can't play pickleball,
Speaker 1: maybe you can't pick up the grandchildren. It's pain, knee pain,
Speaker 1: hit pain, wherever the pain happens to be. And their
Speaker 1: doctors talk to you about surgery, and you're thinking about surgery,
Speaker 1: and you're thinking about, well, the downsides of surgery, the
Speaker 1: risk that go along with surgery, the recovery time that
Speaker 1: goes along with surgery, and you're done with the pain meds.
Speaker 1: So what about thinking along a different line? And all
Speaker 1: natural approach aren't your own bodies healing properties to treat
Speaker 1: the root cause of our thritis pain. That's QC kinetics
Speaker 1: life changing for so many people, tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: satisfied patients throughout the United States. We've got them right
Speaker 1: here in Cincinnati now. And what you have is in
Speaker 1: office procedure with no surgery and no downtime, providing lasting
Speaker 1: relief from chronic joint pain. To find out if you're
Speaker 1: a good candidate, and I guess not everybody is, but listen,
Speaker 1: you get a free consultation up front, so why not
Speaker 1: take them up on and find out if QC kinetics
Speaker 1: regenitive properties and treatments are right for you. Here's the
Speaker 1: number to call for that free consultation. Five one three
Speaker 1: eight four seven zero zero one nine five one three
Speaker 1: eight four seven zero zero one nine again five one
Speaker 1: three eight four seven zero zero one nine.
Speaker 12: This is fifty five KRC, an iHeartRadio station.
Speaker 1: Do you have a massive IRS problem?
Speaker 4: The o.
Speaker 1: Jenna nine. First, we want to vocass partly fid the skies.
Speaker 1: It'll become mostly sunny. They're predicting seventy two for the
Speaker 1: high overnight low of fifty with a few clouds. Sunny
Speaker 1: tomorrow with the highest seventy eight, a few clouds overnight
Speaker 1: down to fifty again and in mostly futy Thursday with
Speaker 1: just a slight chancellrain highest seventy nine, forty eight. Right now,
Speaker 1: time for first traffic.
Speaker 13: Fundly you see health Tramfic Center and you see healthy
Speaker 13: op fine comprehensive care that's so personal and make your
Speaker 13: best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care for better outcomes, expect more.
Speaker 13: And you see health dot Com. Highway traffic send great
Speaker 13: shape this morning. No accidents to deal with. No delays
Speaker 13: in two downtown southbound seventy five included under fifteen minutes
Speaker 13: Sharonville to the bridge chuck Ingram on fifty five.
Speaker 2: Care see the talk station.
Speaker 1: By forty two. If you do, you have car c
Speaker 1: detalk station. Time for the stack is stupid. Let's start locally,
Speaker 1: shall we? Fox nineteen reporting from Ludlow, Kentucky. Loudlou City
Speaker 1: council members voted I guess yesterday to keep one of
Speaker 1: their council members after being accused of licking a city
Speaker 1: administrator's hand. Why are you doing that? After what they
Speaker 1: describe as hours of witness testimony, the council voted to
Speaker 1: keep Abigail Miller on the council. She said quote, I'm thankful.
Speaker 1: I'm thankful I got to stay where the people elected
Speaker 1: me to stay on city council. So I'm thankful specifically
Speaker 1: to mister Ziegler for keeping me on council. Close quote.
Speaker 1: Miller accused of licking a former police chief and now
Speaker 1: Ludlow City administrator Scott Smith after his interview. According to witness,
Speaker 1: Smith filed a complaining against Miller for sexual harassment and battery,
Speaker 1: claiming she licked his hands before hand rather before a
Speaker 1: job interview. Why are you doing that? I don't know
Speaker 1: if we ever going to find out to remove a
Speaker 1: member Apparently unanimous voters required. Miller's attorney claimed Smith, along
Speaker 1: with other witnesses, had a hand in manipulating the process
Speaker 1: to become city administrator after someone else was selected first.
Speaker 1: Smith denies the claim that he was trying to influence
Speaker 1: a council, saying, quote, it was no surprise that they
Speaker 1: came after me personally, making it everything about every issue
Speaker 1: other than what was issue at hand, And the issue
Speaker 1: at hand is that she licked me unwanted, and there's
Speaker 1: no punishment for it. Close quote. Smith has not stated
Speaker 1: whether he will file a criminal complaint. You see no
Speaker 1: answer to the question why are you doing that?
Speaker 10: Don't vote Democrat?
Speaker 1: In under what circumstances would you'd lick someone's hand? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, is there a flag for that one? Joe,
Speaker 1: at least not in a public setting. Two teachers in
Speaker 1: Battle Louis battl Rouge, Louisiana, have been placed on leave
Speaker 1: after an altercation between them, according to authorities. One of
Speaker 1: the teachers now facing criminal charges. Baton Rouge Police Department
Speaker 1: said two teachers got into a fight bel air head
Speaker 1: Start around ten am last Wednesday. The officials say thirty
Speaker 1: five year old Ashley Daniels was issued to summons for
Speaker 1: misdemeanor simple battery court of officials. Both teachers were placed
Speaker 1: on administrative leave while the Bretton Rouge Police and the
Speaker 1: city parish Human Resource Department investigate head Start program, described
Speaker 1: as a preschool read in his program, typically serving children
Speaker 1: between the ages of three and five. Program manager doctor
Speaker 1: Carr Tina Roberts deferred comment on the matter to the
Speaker 1: parish's communications team. Spokeswoman Fallon Brown for the city parish
Speaker 1: wrote in a statement, the Safety and wellbeing of the
Speaker 1: children in our care as our highest priority. We will
Speaker 1: not tolerate conduct that compromises the integrity of our educational
Speaker 1: environment or the trust in our community. Children of Baton
Speaker 1: Rouse serve a safe, respectful and supportive learning atmosphere. Brown
Speaker 1: added that a critical incident report about the fight has
Speaker 1: been submitted to parish officials and is being reviewed as
Speaker 1: part of the investigation. Sadly, that's it no additional details
Speaker 1: on why they got into a fight, which is ultimately
Speaker 1: the best advice that you can probably take. Five point
Speaker 1: forty five right now. If you five k c DE
Speaker 1: talk station, get in touch with Chimneycare, Fireplace and Stove.
Speaker 1: If you have any type of chimney, then you need
Speaker 1: a chimney inspection because you might have water damage and
Speaker 1: it's free, free exterior evaluation. Protect your chimney from water damage.
Speaker 1: Make sure everything's okay. I don't know about the flashing
Speaker 1: or calking or what can cause water damage, but water
Speaker 1: damage can definitely be an issue when it comes to chimneys,
Speaker 1: and it's one of those things you might not have
Speaker 1: any idea that's going on. So save yourself huge headaches
Speaker 1: down the road. Book your appointment a Chimneycare fireplace and
Speaker 1: stove and them look at it for free. Now, if
Speaker 1: you have a wood burning fireplace or free standing stove
Speaker 1: or some other wood burning type unit like a self
Speaker 1: feeding wood waste pellet stove, get the woodburning sweeping evaluation
Speaker 1: the Spring special that has only one sixty nine ninety
Speaker 1: nine plus tax, and they will do the exterior chimney
Speaker 1: evaluation that goes along with that, so they'll check your
Speaker 1: whole thing inside and out with the video camera inspection.
Speaker 1: A certified chimney sweep will sweep it out, make sure
Speaker 1: everything is safe so you can enjoy that fireplace when well,
Speaker 1: when the weather gets cold again. So the Spring special
Speaker 1: is going on. The free exterior and the wood burning
Speaker 1: sweep in evaluation only one hundred and sixty nine ninety
Speaker 1: nine plus tax a plus with a better business bureau
Speaker 1: locally undoperated since nineteen eighty eight, call them up five
Speaker 1: one three two four eight ninety six hundred, book the
Speaker 1: appointment five one three two four eight ninety six hundred,
Speaker 1: or book it online. Go to Chimneycareco dot com. Fifty
Speaker 1: five KRC the talk station Harri's the weather forecast from
Speaker 1: Channel nine we have a part lease. Cloudy sky is
Speaker 1: going to be mostly sunny at some point. Today's seventy
Speaker 1: two for the high, end of fifty overnight with some
Speaker 1: clouds sunny and seventy eight Tomorrow, a few clouds over
Speaker 1: night and fifty for the low again. And on thursdayssist
Speaker 1: a slight chance rain, mostly cloudy day with the highest
Speaker 1: seventy nine forty eight. Right now, time for traffic from.
Speaker 13: The UCL Traffic Centery. You see health you'll find comprehensive.
Speaker 13: That's so personal it make sure best tomorrow possible. That's
Speaker 13: boundless care for better outcomes. Expect more at ucehelp dot com.
Speaker 13: Highways not bad to deal with this morning north found
Speaker 13: seventy five and northbound fourth seventy one. Folk Wide open
Speaker 13: coming into downtown. No overnight work crews are slowing things down.
Speaker 13: Chuck Ingram on fifty five KRC the talk station.
Speaker 1: Five forty or five fifty one VideA five krsit the
Speaker 1: talk station. Happy Tuesday to you. Going back to this
Speaker 1: takers duvide men admitted to smoking a joint during a
Speaker 1: traffic stop. Richland police officers is Mississippi pulled over the
Speaker 1: vehicle for a traffic violation officer smelled weed. The driver,
Speaker 1: Carl Dominio Demino, fifty eight years old, admitted to smoking
Speaker 1: and handed the officer of the joint. It was at
Speaker 1: that point the officer carried out a probable cause search
Speaker 1: of the vehicle and found more than one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty ecstasy pills, more than three pounds of pure ecstasy
Speaker 1: or MDMA, five pounds of psychedelic mushroom, twelve files of
Speaker 1: pure LSD, half a pound of marijuana, and two digital
Speaker 1: scales street vet street value two hundred grand. Not surprisingly,
Speaker 1: he was arrested charged with drug trafficking, and police say
Speaker 1: that he had been arrested more than twenty times previously
Speaker 1: and had been convicted of at least a dozen felonies
Speaker 1: in seven states. That was where I was going. They
Speaker 1: go to Cambria County, Pennsylvania, where authorities there say local
Speaker 1: man's now facing charges after being accused of inappropriately touching
Speaker 1: a male employee at an area sheets store earlier in
Speaker 1: the month. Please say, forty nine year old Keith Poplinsky
Speaker 1: allegedly groped the employee well he was reportedly cleaning the
Speaker 1: coffee machines at the grouser street sheets location. Why are
Speaker 1: you doing that? Cord of the affida. But I think
Speaker 1: you can come up with your own conclusion on that, Joe,
Speaker 1: Please say the leg Yeah, there you are. Ledge incident
Speaker 1: captured on Yes the stores surveillance footage in best gotta say.
Speaker 1: Poplenski was reportedly waiting for a food order when he
Speaker 1: proceeded to repeatedly touch the victim near his groin area.
Speaker 1: How hard is it? Well, since it was an unwelcome advanced, Joe,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go with not very police note of the
Speaker 1: employee did tell Poplensky to stop touching him?
Speaker 4: What mean?
Speaker 1: Court to the surveillance video authority say that after the incident,
Speaker 1: Poplinski allegedly attempted to shake the employee's hand. Please say
Speaker 1: the victim told obviously he did not know Poplinski personally
Speaker 1: and only knew him as a frequent customer of the store.
Speaker 1: Poplenski charged with misdemeanors for disorderly conduct and open lewdness.
Speaker 1: A man who police say was erratic and bit an
Speaker 1: officer during an arrest, suffered a medical emergency and dropped dead.
Speaker 1: Fulton police officers first bought of the man until about
Speaker 1: twelve thirty in the morning after closing hours at Lemon
Speaker 1: Park Corning Department news released Please say the man looked
Speaker 1: to be holding a smoldering cardboard box and was acting erratically.
Speaker 1: As more officers showed up, police said the man became
Speaker 1: uncooperative and began to physically resist. More officers then called
Speaker 1: to provide assistance, and according to the department, that took
Speaker 1: several of them to gain control of the guy and
Speaker 1: put him in restraints. As officers were taking the man
Speaker 1: into custody, he violently bit an officer on the arm,
Speaker 1: causing injuries. Fulton Fire Department were trying to treat both
Speaker 1: the suspect and the officer. Several minutes later. According to
Speaker 1: the release the arrest, he appeared to have a medical emergency.
Speaker 1: Police said. Paramedics began life saving measures and took the
Speaker 1: man to a nearby hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
Speaker 1: Idiots doing idiot things because they're idiots.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: I was thinking this would have more of an Epstein
Speaker 1: air of mystery to it, you know, like he was
Speaker 1: put in his cell and then they came back later
Speaker 1: and that's when they found him dead. Yeah, well that
Speaker 1: could be that the police officer was poisonous. They supposed
Speaker 1: the small potential of that officer who was bitten, was
Speaker 1: treated at the hospital and then released. Investigators with the
Speaker 1: orange kinted District Attorney's Office responded for an independent investigation
Speaker 1: into the death.
Speaker 4: And that's it.
Speaker 1: Now, you heard, probably at the top of the air
Speaker 1: news I did this other one. Some idiot went around
Speaker 1: with a chainsaw and cut down dozens of trees all
Speaker 1: across downtown Laws Angeles.
Speaker 3: What the hell?
Speaker 1: What is to be gained by that? Anyhow, the mystery
Speaker 1: will never be answered or solved. Stick around at six
Speaker 1: o'clock hour coming, I've got more to talk about. Your
Speaker 1: phone calls are always welcome. Five one, three, seven, four, nine,
Speaker 1: fifty five hundred, eight hundred and eighty two to three talk.
Speaker 1: I'll be right back covering Trump's first one hundred days.
Speaker 11: Every day, promises made, promises kept.
Speaker 1: Fifty five krs the talk station. It's six oh five,
Speaker 1: coming up at six or six fifty five kr CEB
Speaker 1: talk station right the time. I see you, wishing everyone
Speaker 1: a happy Tuesday and inviting you to stick around. Looking
Speaker 1: forward to Dave Williams for the Taxpayer Protection Line. So
Speaker 1: we'll be on in an hour. First topic, Congress utter
Speaker 1: disregard for a fiscal responsibility. I just laugh at that.
Speaker 1: It's like, you know, yeah, we're thirty six coming up
Speaker 1: with thirty seven trillion dollars in the hole. Your debt
Speaker 1: services are trillion dollars a year. That's our credit card
Speaker 1: interest rate payment. I mean, yeah, we've got disregre utter
Speaker 1: disregard for fiscal responsibility. And yes, Republicans and Democrats, everyone
Speaker 1: across the board bears responsibility for that. They'll talk about
Speaker 1: the need to extend Trump tax cuts, which, of course
Speaker 1: deadline's approaching on that reconciliation I think is the mechanism
Speaker 1: for that. Dave Williams will address those topics, follow by
Speaker 1: the legal expert Steve Goodin from a Porter right, excellent
Speaker 1: lawyer he is. He's going to break down the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court's decision on the venezuel and the prisoners inside scoop
Speaker 1: with Bright Barton News. Fast forward to eight oh five
Speaker 1: Bob Price, the Texas Border Associate editor. He'll talk about
Speaker 1: the MS thirteen gang members having basically more rights than Americans,
Speaker 1: and also the Democratic judge I had to resign after
Speaker 1: harboring a gang member in his and his wife's home,
Speaker 1: which is just the most bizarre story. Plus it is Tuesday,
Speaker 1: so we get the Daniel Davis Deep Dive with the
Speaker 1: latest on Ukraine and Russia. Feel free to call love
Speaker 1: to hear from the listeners of Something You Want to
Speaker 1: Talk About five one, three, seven, four nine fifty five hundred,
Speaker 1: eight hundred eighty two to three talk go with pound
Speaker 1: five fifty on AT and T phones. We were talking
Speaker 1: about this insane Senator Chris van Holland and his trip
Speaker 1: down to visit this Kilmar Armando Arbregio Garzia guy. And
Speaker 1: I've had Ken Blackwell in the program many many times
Speaker 1: over the years. Just think, really, I think the world
Speaker 1: of Ken Blackwell. And he addressed that in a broader
Speaker 1: context and is uh an opinion piece he wrote for
Speaker 1: town Hall, And I thought it was, you know, he
Speaker 1: made some student observations and you know, sort of illustrating
Speaker 1: the Trump administration moving in the right direction as contrasted
Speaker 1: to the Biden administration, who basically was going after well
Speaker 1: moms and dads who cared about the content of what
Speaker 1: their children were learning in school. How did he bring
Speaker 1: all those together? Don't tell Senator Chris van Holland, but
Speaker 1: the On April seventeenth, the Department of Justice released detailed
Speaker 1: evidence demonstrating how Kilmar Armando Igo Garcia, whom Senator Van
Speaker 1: Holland and his fellow Democrats falsely portrayed as an innocent
Speaker 1: Maryland father, is not only an illegal immigrant, but also
Speaker 1: a violent member of the rural Ms thirteen gang. Apartment
Speaker 1: of Homeland Security also provided court documents showing Garcia's wife
Speaker 1: had previously sought the domestic violence restraining order against him,
Speaker 1: accusing him of assault and other forms of abuse. It's
Speaker 1: the clearest sign yet that the adults are back in
Speaker 1: charge of protecting America's homeland, and that's great for America's safety.
Speaker 1: This degree of coordination between the Department of Justice and
Speaker 1: the Department of Homeland Security under Trump's leadership stands in
Speaker 1: start sharp contrast to the Biden administration, where both agencies
Speaker 1: work together to advance the Biden administration's radical political agenda
Speaker 1: instead of protecting public safety. Under the leadership then Secretary
Speaker 1: Aleander Maiorchis, Biden's DHS did everything could to maximize the
Speaker 1: mass illegal immigration of suspected terrorists and violent criminals who
Speaker 1: preyed on American citizens. Secretary of MYIARCHUS stopped construction of
Speaker 1: Trump's border wall, and kept Ice and Border patrol from
Speaker 1: doing their jobs when a surgeon border crossings Biden specifically
Speaker 1: asked for became a political liability for Democrats, and Attorney
Speaker 1: General Mery Garland coordinated to massively expand temporary protected status
Speaker 1: and created the CHNV program, parolling hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: unvetted migrants into the US interior, complete with an app
Speaker 1: to streamline the process. Things weren't any better at Biden's
Speaker 1: Department of Justice. Garland presided over a DOJ that targeted
Speaker 1: Catholic parishes, inflated to domestic extremism statistics, and labeled concerned
Speaker 1: parents as potential terrorists. Remember those days, Peaceful pro life
Speaker 1: activists were arrested at gunpoint, while left wing extremists who
Speaker 1: threatened Supreme Court justices or firebombed crisis pregnancy centers were ignored.
Speaker 1: You know, and you can think about all the violence
Speaker 1: that was you wielded on our cities with ANTIFI and
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter groups and these crazy leftists running them
Speaker 1: up in the streets, throwing at frozen bottles of water
Speaker 1: at police officers and fireworks and torching buildings, doing literally
Speaker 1: millions of dollars worth of damage. Do you ever hear
Speaker 1: about any prosecutions for them? Nothing. Garland also appointed Special
Speaker 1: Council Jack Smith under dubious legal authority to imprison Biden's
Speaker 1: chief political rival. At the same time, the DOJ's Anti
Speaker 1: Trust Division attempted to blame private companies like Visa for
Speaker 1: the inflation caused by Biden's federal overspending. That's not an exaggeration.
Speaker 1: When Biden's big government stimulus spending helped drive inflation to
Speaker 1: a thirty year high. The DOJ's response was the sue
Speaker 1: Visa for charging merchants roughly zero point two to three
Speaker 1: percent in debit card transaction fees, translating into about fourteen
Speaker 1: cents on a sixty dollars purchase. The case was an
Speaker 1: embarrassing attempt to scapegoat to private company for Democrat induced inflation.
Speaker 1: Added all up, and it becomes clear that Biden's DOJ
Speaker 1: and DHS were not focused on public safety, national security,
Speaker 1: or the rule of law. They were focused on politics.
Speaker 1: Now that's changing. Trump's team is showing the country what
Speaker 1: it looks like when the DOJ and DHS returned to
Speaker 1: the core mission of protecting American citizens. They're working together
Speaker 1: to go after real threats. Not parents, not pro lifers,
Speaker 1: not credit card companies, but violent gang members, abusers, and
Speaker 1: foreign nationals who break our laws and endanger our communities.
Speaker 1: Restoring credibility and functionality of these agencies after four years
Speaker 1: of abuse is a significant step in rebuilding trust with
Speaker 1: the American people. Real justice means enforcing the law fairly, consistently,
Speaker 1: and with the goal of public safety. And for the
Speaker 1: first time in four years, that's finally happening. You know,
Speaker 1: I look back on the four years of the Biden
Speaker 1: administration as I reflect on Ken Blackwell's words, it is
Speaker 1: really an amazing thing to behold, and most notably the
Speaker 1: realities of that open border. Look at what happened. Cities overrun,
Speaker 1: I mean cities that are already struggling financially, overrun schools, overwhelmed,
Speaker 1: children who can't speak English, barely can speak English, if
Speaker 1: at all, holding back your children from getting an education
Speaker 1: because we have to accommodate those kids. They've got to
Speaker 1: learn English. Resources precious scarce resources allocated to dealing with
Speaker 1: schools overwhelmed by a bunch of young people coming in
Speaker 1: out of nowhere based on an open border, intentionally open
Speaker 1: border strategy. And I find it out that it's like
Speaker 1: no one ever really wanted to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of the whys and wherefores that the Biden administration was
Speaker 1: engaged in and letting every human being in the world
Speaker 1: come into our country. I know they were all hoping
Speaker 1: to make them citizens someday and get Democrat voters and everything,
Speaker 1: but you know that's not going to happen, at least
Speaker 1: I don't see it happening. And look what it had
Speaker 1: the effect of doing. Donald Trump won the presidency, and
Speaker 1: that may be in large part because of Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden, who obviously was cognitively impaired, and apparently
Speaker 1: every single human being working with the Biden administration knew
Speaker 1: it and covered it up. Books are coming out from
Speaker 1: people who were otherwise defenders of Joe Biden during this
Speaker 1: period of time when we all could see his cognitive decline.
Speaker 1: You know, believe your own eyes, there he is stumbling around,
Speaker 1: sounded like a complete idiot. Something's wrong with the man.
Speaker 1: We all knew and could easily figure it out. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: sharpest men in the room. No no, no, his defenders
Speaker 1: would say, defenders who are now coming out with books
Speaker 1: talking about how his impairment was well known among the staff,
Speaker 1: and they did everything they could to hide it from
Speaker 1: the world. I mean, we were lied to over and
Speaker 1: over again. We the American people who elected these clowns
Speaker 1: to ride herd over affairs and past legislation or otherwise,
Speaker 1: you know, dictate the terms and conditions of our life.
Speaker 1: We find out were absolute liars and pivoting over. They
Speaker 1: allowed our country to be overrun with people who had
Speaker 1: no legal wor right to be in our country, and
Speaker 1: yet soak up all the valuable resources that we can
Speaker 1: barely manage for our own populace. And it took the
Speaker 1: Trump administration to come in with Elon Musk to find
Speaker 1: out that all the Social Security numbers that are out
Speaker 1: there for people who are three hundred years old or whatever,
Speaker 1: they're being used for nefarious purposes. Checks are going out
Speaker 1: to people who shouldn't be getting checks, and illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: who have no right to work in this country legally
Speaker 1: are using social Security numbers to work. One little sliver
Speaker 1: of what Doze is uncovered, but the damage that was
Speaker 1: done that was all intentional. And as I turned back
Speaker 1: to that gallup pole with people's in Democrats' confidence in
Speaker 1: Congress and their elected officials is down in the bottom
Speaker 1: of the barrel. Do you think maybe they got it wrong?
Speaker 1: You think of all the inroads that were made into
Speaker 1: the black population and the Hispanic population in this country
Speaker 1: when Trump got elected and won the popular vote, when
Speaker 1: you look at the numbers and the statistics that show, yes,
Speaker 1: many people in the black community and many people in
Speaker 1: this Spanic community voted for Donald Trump in numbers that
Speaker 1: were really surprising to the Democrats. Oh my god, what's
Speaker 1: going on here? Maybe people woke up, Maybe people understood
Speaker 1: that what the Democrats were doing to America was not
Speaker 1: good for Americans generally, regardless of what race, or religion,
Speaker 1: or ethnicity or whatever they are. And now they're running
Speaker 1: around organizing protests and screaming fascist and Nazi, just screaming
Speaker 1: at the top of their lungs as if that's a
Speaker 1: policy platform that that's going to get them elected. Just
Speaker 1: exhibitions of outright rage and anger. How do you what
Speaker 1: do you translate that into in terms of you know
Speaker 1: what I want to be elected because I plan on
Speaker 1: doing the following rage, rage, anger, anger, Nazi, nazi nazi. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but what do you plan on doing? What's what's your
Speaker 1: idea for the What's what's your recipe for success in
Speaker 1: America for all American people? What do you plan on doing? Rage? Rage, anger, anger, anger?
Speaker 2: You know, let them go.
Speaker 1: I I've said it before. I just like they seem
Speaker 1: to be digging themselves their own hole. I'm just befuddled
Speaker 1: by the whole thing. And no, I don't think Trump's perfect.
Speaker 1: I'm a little worried about this trade war that's coming.
Speaker 1: I'm a little concerned about what these tariffs are going
Speaker 1: to do. Legitimate concerns shared by people of all political stripes.
Speaker 1: I mean, go ahead, read about it all the time.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's right or wrong. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: find out myself along with you got my popcorn out.
Speaker 1: There's not a damn thing I can do about it
Speaker 1: except live through whatever happens, and you know what, maybe
Speaker 1: you'll end up working out, maybe it won't. We're living
Speaker 1: in an experiment here. But at least he's trying to
Speaker 1: right this ship, and most notably in the area of
Speaker 1: illegal immigration. He's trying to get rid of the worst
Speaker 1: of the worst, and you got this idiot Van Holland
Speaker 1: going down and entertaining and hoping to bring back an
Speaker 1: MS thirteen gang member who beats the crap out of
Speaker 1: his wife. Keep digging, Brian, You're gonna have to hang on.
Speaker 1: I just looked up and saw the clock and saw
Speaker 1: that you're on the phone. I'm happy to take your call.
Speaker 1: All calls are welcome here in the Morning Show five one, three, seven, four,
Speaker 1: nine fifty five hundred, eight hundred eighty two three talk.
Speaker 1: You know what maybe I need to do is take
Speaker 1: a walk through Gay to Heaven Cemetery, Montgomery. I mean,
Speaker 1: it sounds a little interesting to be walking through a cemetery,
Speaker 1: but it's a beautiful, serene that wonderfully maintained setting, and
Speaker 1: you know, it's open for everyone to enjoy. It's a
Speaker 1: park like rolling hills, maturei stree, mature trees. The landscaping
Speaker 1: is all absolutely perfect and seasonal flowers spring time with
Speaker 1: the flowers popping up, the reflective water features. It's a
Speaker 1: tranquil atmosphere. It's a place where you can be prayerful
Speaker 1: and reflective, and you know, it's it's a good place
Speaker 1: to find some peace in the crazy world we find
Speaker 1: ourselves in. So join the atmosphere at gay To Heaven Cemetery.
Speaker 1: It is open for everyone, ministering to the Tristate for
Speaker 1: over seventy seven years and honoring life on sacred ground.
Speaker 1: To learn more, just head on over to the website
Speaker 1: Gateofheaven dot org. That's gateof Heaven dot org fifty five KRC. Guys,
Speaker 1: are you tired of there's your Channeline weather poecasts partly
Speaker 1: cloudy and then turn mostly sunny today seventy two for
Speaker 1: the high down to fifty over night with a few
Speaker 1: clouds sunny. Tomorrow is seventy eight, few clouds overnight fifty
Speaker 1: and on Thursday, I the mostly cloudy day with just
Speaker 1: a slight chance of rain and a highest seventy nine.
Speaker 1: Right now it's forty nine. Time for traffic.
Speaker 2: From the u See Health Traffic Center.
Speaker 13: If you see Health, you'll find comprehensive care that's so
Speaker 13: personal and makes your best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care
Speaker 13: from better outcomes. Expect more at u seehealth dot com.
Speaker 13: Highway traffic doing just fine, no meanjor problems into downtown.
Speaker 13: As of yet, crews are going to be inspecting a
Speaker 13: railroad trest all on Mount Carmel Road, and until they
Speaker 13: do today, it's closed between Broadwell and round Bottom and
Speaker 13: Anderson Township.
Speaker 2: Chuck Ingram on fifty five care and see the talk station.
Speaker 1: Twenty three THIK five KRCD talk stations jump straight to
Speaker 1: the phone. Frian was kind enough to hold over the break. Brian,
Speaker 1: thanks for holding. Welcome to the program.
Speaker 10: Hey, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 9: Can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Absolutely loud and clear.
Speaker 4: Okay, okay.
Speaker 10: So I remember before the election, Brian, you were I
Speaker 10: seemed like you and I were listening. You were saying,
Speaker 10: like Trump is the devisive you know, is there anyone
Speaker 10: else better? And at the time when I was listening
Speaker 10: to you, I was getting frustraed. I was one of
Speaker 10: this kind of you know, I'm a Trump for guy. Yeah,
Speaker 10: you do you see anyone at this point now that
Speaker 10: he would say, h there's no one better than Trump.
Speaker 10: I mean, when you look around at Congress and the
Speaker 10: different politicians, do you see someone else that would.
Speaker 4: Job? No.
Speaker 1: I'm with you. I am actually shocked and amazed at
Speaker 1: what he's been able to accomplish because I think he
Speaker 1: had that first four years under his belt. He had
Speaker 1: to learn the system, learn the process, deal with the
Speaker 1: idiots and the bureaucrats, and figure it out. And then
Speaker 1: so he hit the ground running. He hit the ground sprinting.
Speaker 1: I've been amazed at what he's been able to do,
Speaker 1: and I'm very happy the man got elected. You know,
Speaker 1: and I listen, I can't read, you know, tea leaf
Speaker 1: reading is you know, everybody's political. Every It's like being
Speaker 1: an economist. You know, you guess and maybe you're right,
Speaker 1: maybe you're wrong. I had my reservations, obviously, I spoke
Speaker 1: out loud about them. He got the nomination. He beat
Speaker 1: the crap out of Kamala Harrison. That doesn't surprise me,
Speaker 1: because she was a clown in a buffoon. But what
Speaker 1: he's been able to accomplish in the first, you know,
Speaker 1: a couple of months of his presidency has been amazing.
Speaker 1: And I think that's because he had a team behind
Speaker 1: the scenes, knew exactly the direction that they wanted to go,
Speaker 1: and had everything ready so that he could hit the
Speaker 1: ground running. I mean, all did' you should think, Brian,
Speaker 1: all those executive orders had already been drafted and piled
Speaker 1: up in a room somewhere before he got elected. I
Speaker 1: mean they had to have been he was ready to go,
Speaker 1: and it's been impressive, so absolutely, I eat my words.
Speaker 1: I'm glad he's there. I'm glad he's doing the job
Speaker 1: he's doing, and I wish him all the best in
Speaker 1: the world. My only concern happens to be with tariffs.
Speaker 2: But you know what, what do I know.
Speaker 1: I'm not an economist. I don't play one on radio.
Speaker 1: I just I know about the smooth Holly Terriff Act
Speaker 1: and how bad it was for our economy here. But
Speaker 1: we'll see what happens. The world's a different place now.
Speaker 1: But yeah, yeah, you're right, Brian, no question about it.
Speaker 1: I think we're much better off. Chuck, you don't mind
Speaker 1: holding I'd be happy to take your call right out
Speaker 1: of the gate. I am out of time. It is
Speaker 1: six twenty six, and I got to mention Peter Shabree
Speaker 1: Kellerwilliams seven Hills. Because you want a great real estate team,
Speaker 1: you want Peter Shabree and his team at Keller Williams
Speaker 1: seven Hills. They're the best in the business. It's a
Speaker 1: summon an outstanding team. And it's important that you get
Speaker 1: value out of your real estate agent. Where you've got
Speaker 1: a real estate agent for a buyer or for a
Speaker 1: seller's agent, there are you can't beat them. They're just
Speaker 1: it's just their their hands down five star experiences. What
Speaker 1: you're going to get, love it or leave it. If
Speaker 1: they're your a buyer's agent, they find you a home,
Speaker 1: and if you don't love it during the first year,
Speaker 1: you're like, uh, oh, made a big mistake. They know
Speaker 1: that they're going to do the right job by you
Speaker 1: in finding the home, but if for some reason it
Speaker 1: doesn't work out, they'll sell it for free if you
Speaker 1: want to sell it in the first year. Just to
Speaker 1: guarantee from the Sabri Group of Keler Williams Seven Hills,
Speaker 1: they know what they are doing again. Five star experiences.
Speaker 1: What you're going to get To reach them, call them
Speaker 1: up five one three seven zero eight three thousand. Five
Speaker 1: one three seven zero eight three thousand, go to the
Speaker 1: website just drop the five one three seven zero eight
Speaker 1: three thousand dot com fifty five KRC.
Speaker 11: Waking up on the right side.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Morning Minute.
Speaker 14: In this new poll that came out about potential twenty
Speaker 14: twenty eight candidates a Yelle youth poll. It points out
Speaker 14: it found that both men are upside down with their
Speaker 14: party's young voters, and they found a plurality of Democrats
Speaker 14: would vote for Kamala Harris twenty seven point five percent,
Speaker 14: AOC twenty one point three percent, Pete Buddha Judge Pothold
Speaker 14: Pete fourteen percent. No other Democrat got more than five
Speaker 14: percent of the votes. The top three candidates were the
Speaker 14: same among young Democrats only with even stronger support for
Speaker 14: Harris at thirty seven point four percent a Casio Cortes
Speaker 14: at twenty eight point two percent, which, by the way,
Speaker 14: if your Kamala, you should be paying very close attention
Speaker 14: to it, from.
Speaker 1: Coast to coast, from c to Shining Sea. It's a
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity show.
Speaker 14: Now, don't get suckered into the same old free phone
Speaker 14: game by Big Wireless that comes with a lot of
Speaker 14: fine print plus plus plus plus oh. In other words,
Speaker 14: you pay more and more and more. At the end
Speaker 14: of the day you paid for that quote free phone
Speaker 14: three times over. There is a better way. Pure talk.
Speaker 14: My cell phone provider, a veteran own company, my sponsor,
Speaker 14: my wireless company has a much better offer. A free
Speaker 14: phone with a qualifying plan for just thirty five bucks
Speaker 14: a month, and you get a brand new Samsung Galaxy
Speaker 14: A twenty six. Just make the switch to pure Talk
Speaker 14: for thirty five bucks a month, you get unlimited talk,
Speaker 14: unlimited texts, fifteen gigs of data with mobile hotspot and roaming,
Speaker 14: all in America's most dependable five G network. Just i'le
Speaker 14: pound two to fifty say the keyword save now, and
Speaker 14: Pure Talks US customer service team will help you make
Speaker 14: the switch in as little as ten minutes. Again, pound
Speaker 14: two to fifty keywords save now. Get your free Samsung
Speaker 14: Galaxy with a qualifying plan when you switch to Pure
Speaker 14: Talk Wireless Buy Americans for Americans.
Speaker 6: This reboard is sponsored by One Hour Heating and Air Conditions.
Speaker 1: Jene nine says the following about the weather. We got
Speaker 1: partly cloudy turning mostly Sunday today seventy two for the
Speaker 1: high fifty overnight with a few clouds. Sunday Tomorrow is
Speaker 1: seventy eight, few clouds every night down to fifty again
Speaker 1: and a mostly cloudy day Thursday. Just anxiety chance of
Speaker 1: rain high of seventy nine, forty eight right now, traffic time.
Speaker 13: From that, you see up traffic Center, you see health.
Speaker 13: You'll find comprehensive care that's so personal it makes your
Speaker 13: best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care for better outcomes, Expect more,
Speaker 13: and you seehealth dot com. Highway traffic in pretty good shape,
Speaker 13: with the exception of southbound two seventy five now backing
Speaker 13: enough pay us the Lawrence Fird Ramp and a slow
Speaker 13: go onto the Carroll Cropper thanks to the ongoing construction.
Speaker 13: Chuck Ingram on fifty five kre see the talk station.
Speaker 1: Six thirty Tuesday, and a happy one to You're gonna
Speaker 1: get straight to the phones. Chuck was kind enough to
Speaker 1: hold over the brake. Chuck, welcome to the Morning Show.
Speaker 1: Thanks for calling this morning.
Speaker 9: All right, good morning. I'm not a smart guy. But
Speaker 9: didn't the Trump say that these MS thirteen and that
Speaker 9: other game is a terrorist organization?
Speaker 1: Yes, he designated them as a foreign terrorist organization.
Speaker 9: Okay, so when that senator went down there, that's aiding them, betting.
Speaker 1: He could probably make that argument, Chuck. I haven't say
Speaker 1: anybody else make that argument yet, but yeah, I.
Speaker 9: Mean if I did it with ISIS or the Taliban
Speaker 9: I would go to jail.
Speaker 1: I yeah, yeah, honestly, I don't know what the legal
Speaker 1: ramifications are, what the legal the points are, the factors
Speaker 1: that go into actually fulfilling the aiding and a betting.
Speaker 1: But it sure looks it sure looks like it. They're right,
Speaker 1: it does. That's what makes it. That's what makes it
Speaker 1: so stupid. You know that somebody else called in and
Speaker 1: like you know, they maybe they inadvertently glombed onto this
Speaker 1: guy thinking he really was this in sent father and
Speaker 1: as it turns out, no, he's been adjudicated a gang
Speaker 1: member and he's a wife beater. His wife turned him
Speaker 1: into the cops. And I mean, they picked the wrong guy.
Speaker 1: But apparently this is the hill they want to die
Speaker 1: on now. So yeah, we'll aiding it a better terrorism
Speaker 1: on top of it. Let them let him keep it up,
Speaker 1: chuck right, let him.
Speaker 4: Going.
Speaker 1: Thanks man, that was good. I appreciate the call.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I suppose if he brought him back, and it wouldn't
Speaker 1: that be you know, again, the original it broke the
Speaker 1: broke the law coming across the border in the first instance,
Speaker 1: because he was not legally authorized to enter the country.
Speaker 1: So and then if if he brought him back in this.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that be like a double offense. You know, we
Speaker 1: can make all kinds of arguments. Let's see what Pat's
Speaker 1: got this morning. Pat, Welcome to the Morning Show. Happy
Speaker 1: Tuesday to you.
Speaker 15: Same to you, Brian. There are more and more.
Speaker 9: Uh.
Speaker 15: I don't know if it's Congress or senators, but apparently
Speaker 15: I think they're already down there and they're also trying
Speaker 15: to get this Guarcia guy out. But what I noticed
Speaker 15: Trump had showed a picture of his hands, but when
Speaker 15: he was down there with Van Holland, his hands were
Speaker 15: under the table. He never had his hands above the
Speaker 15: table because apparently the tattoos on his hands apparently showed
Speaker 15: the gang.
Speaker 3: Yeahver their thing is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I've read that he has MS thirteen I guess
Speaker 1: across his knuckles or something like that.
Speaker 15: Yeah, So anyway, sweetheart, you'd be careful and pray for
Speaker 15: the children.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, take care of yourself, appreciate the
Speaker 1: call as always. Yeah, I didn't. I hadn't observed that
Speaker 1: in the interview that he was hiding his hands. But yeah,
Speaker 1: apparently his well tattooed, as most of those MS. Thirteen
Speaker 1: folks are. And you know, think about that as a
Speaker 1: point of evidence. If you're trying to prove somebody as
Speaker 1: a member of MS thirteen, if you've got an MS
Speaker 1: thirteen tattoo, I mean, I'm not sure that that is
Speaker 1: proof positive that you're an MS thirteen gang member. But
Speaker 1: who among us would go out and get an MS
Speaker 1: thirteen tattoo if we weren't affiliated with MS thirteen one,
Speaker 1: because you probably don't want to be affiliated with him
Speaker 1: if you're not, so why would you want people to
Speaker 1: think you are? And second, if an MS thirteen gang
Speaker 1: member sees you with an MS thirteen tattoo and knows
Speaker 1: you not to be part of their gang, I imagine
Speaker 1: you might get a world of hurt unleashed on you
Speaker 1: or appropriating their gang symbol, just saying let's see what
Speaker 1: Mike Scott, Mike, thanks for calling this morning. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the Morning Show.
Speaker 16: And right now, the guy for thirteen is the Democrats
Speaker 16: want to bring him back. But how are they going
Speaker 16: to bring him back? As the President said.
Speaker 11: I'm not going to give him back.
Speaker 16: Trump said, now he's not coming back. That one of
Speaker 16: them bringing back that would be given trafficking. So they
Speaker 16: get in trouble for that.
Speaker 1: Well, That's kind of what I was thinking, because you're facilitating,
Speaker 1: you know, an illegal immigrant gang member, and I guess
Speaker 1: terrorist organization member coming into the country would go back
Speaker 1: to that aiding and abetting a terrorist organization kind of thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it doesn't make any sense. None of this makes any sense,
Speaker 1: which is what's so baffling about all of this. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you are they incapable of stepping outside of themselves
Speaker 1: and you know, licking their finger and testing the political
Speaker 1: wins to see if this has actually any appeal even
Speaker 1: among their own constituents, I just think they're locked in
Speaker 1: their own echo chamber that they think this is what
Speaker 1: everyone really truly wants. So maybe I'm the one in
Speaker 1: an echo chamber. I just don't I mean, I just
Speaker 1: don't see it as you know, good for America, good
Speaker 1: for American politics. None of this is positive for the
Speaker 1: American populist generally speaking, regardless of political stripe. You know,
Speaker 1: I kind of feel the same way about this, them
Speaker 1: falling on the sort of of allowing you know, trans
Speaker 1: athletes to compete against women in women's sports. Now, if
Speaker 1: you're a parent, I mean, this is like something in
Speaker 1: a conversation I had with Christopher Smith, and all the time,
Speaker 1: he's got a daughter, she's a swimmer. He doesn't want
Speaker 1: men competing against his daughter. They have an unfair physical advantage.
Speaker 1: And I'll go back to world records. Look at all
Speaker 1: the world records. In pretty much any damn sport out there,
Speaker 1: men have an advantage, and yet they stand up. Main
Speaker 1: democrats want of women their own constitution to codify allowing
Speaker 1: trans athletes in girls sports. Is that really what the
Speaker 1: City is of Maine actually want, because if it is,
Speaker 1: I'm baffled by that. I'm just it makes absolutely no
Speaker 1: sense to me. And it's not that I have some
Speaker 1: sort of ill will or hatred towards someone because they
Speaker 1: believe they're of a different gender. Actually, on many levels,
Speaker 1: feel sorry for them. And you know, don't you know,
Speaker 1: you don't have to have pity for me. But you know,
Speaker 1: from a logical, reasonable and fairness standpoint, I don't mind
Speaker 1: that you live among us in society. I don't bear
Speaker 1: any ill will towards you as a member of society.
Speaker 1: Get a job, go to work, participate, you go vote,
Speaker 1: do what you need to do. But when it comes
Speaker 1: down to participating against women in sports, that's not fair.
Speaker 1: Six thirty seven fifty five k s the talk station
Speaker 1: chime in five and three seven four nine fifty five hundred,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and eighty two three talking get yourself USA
Speaker 1: Insulation get a free inspection. I usually bring it. The
Speaker 1: free inspection is great because they'll give you a free
Speaker 1: quote on USA Insallation's Premium foam in your exterior home.
Speaker 1: But if you're one of those homes that is older
Speaker 1: but not pre mid seventies, then you probably have insulation
Speaker 1: in the exterior walls. And I love using my daughter's
Speaker 1: home as an example because we bought USA Premium Foam
Speaker 1: as the housewarming gift for her and her fiance. Now,
Speaker 1: they only had R twelve in the house when it
Speaker 1: was built, and that was R twelve back then in
Speaker 1: the late seventies when it was built, and it does
Speaker 1: not have or did not have R twelve insulate insulative
Speaker 1: capacity because the stuff breaks down over time, so it
Speaker 1: isn't insulating as well. So if you're in that situation,
Speaker 1: that's what a free inspection's all about. They'll figure out
Speaker 1: what's in the wall, if anything, and whether you can
Speaker 1: benefit by the premium foam, And I'm telling you you
Speaker 1: can benefit by it. It's the highest R value foam
Speaker 1: in the market, made right here in the state of Ohio,
Speaker 1: and they have done thousands of homes and everybody gets
Speaker 1: a smile on their face and the only regret you'll
Speaker 1: have is, geez, why didn't I do this sooner? You know,
Speaker 1: the heat of summer is going to be barren down
Speaker 1: upon us in virtually no time. You are going to
Speaker 1: be running your air conditioner and it's going to cost
Speaker 1: you a fortune. Energy bills keep going up, guaranteed savings
Speaker 1: from USA Insulation, and the comfort will be noticeable and
Speaker 1: proven and comfort from day one. Quieter home to start with,
Speaker 1: but that the distribution of your HVAC is going to
Speaker 1: be noticeably improved. So if you got that hot room
Speaker 1: in your house, you can ever seem to get a
Speaker 1: cool down, that problem will be solved. And you saved
Speaker 1: money and it only ninety nine dollars a month interest free.
Speaker 1: Many of my listeners have done this and they save
Speaker 1: more than that. The product pays for itself. It qualifies
Speaker 1: you for a twelve hundred dollars energy tax credit when
Speaker 1: you're doing next year's taxes, So take advantage of that
Speaker 1: or don't as the case may be, it's like getting
Speaker 1: a check for twelve hundred dollars. So call for the
Speaker 1: free inspection and get the free quote and get it done.
Speaker 1: You'd be glad you did five one three three eight
Speaker 1: one three six two six five three three eight one
Speaker 1: fund learn more online. It's usainsallation dot net.
Speaker 12: This is fifty five KRC and iHeartRadio station.
Speaker 1: Terror Joenline says the following about the weather. Today's weather
Speaker 1: partly cloudy, turning sunny, seventy two for the high over nine,
Speaker 1: a couple of clouds in will of fifty, mostly sunny
Speaker 1: skys Tomorrow seventy eight for the high, down to fifty
Speaker 1: again overnight with again a few clouds. Thursday at mostly
Speaker 1: cloudy day going up to seventy nine along with a
Speaker 1: very slight chance of rain forty eight degrees. Right now,
Speaker 1: it's time for a traffic update.
Speaker 2: Chuck from the UCL Traffic Center. You see help.
Speaker 13: You'll find comprehensive care that's so personal it makes your
Speaker 13: best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care for better outcomes. Expect
Speaker 13: more at uc help dot com. Southbound two seventy five
Speaker 13: loading up now between Lawrenceburg the Lawrence Burn ramp and
Speaker 13: the Carrol Cropper Bridge. You need to add next to
Speaker 13: three to four minutes minimum to get into northern Kentucky traffic.
Speaker 13: Elsewhere doing okay, Chuck Ingram on fifty five kre and
Speaker 13: see the talk station.
Speaker 1: Coming to a six forty three fifty five KRCV talks
Speaker 1: station after Tuesday five one three seven eighty two to
Speaker 1: three talk looking for to David Williams Taxpayer Text Alliance.
Speaker 1: After the top of the air, News and Steve Gooden,
Speaker 1: our legal expert, can to be talking about the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court decision regarding Venezuelan prisoners. Also inside scoop, we'll talk
Speaker 1: Texas Border associated ator Bob price Adato five on the
Speaker 1: MS thirteen gang members having more rights than Americans dominant
Speaker 1: topic of conversation this morning. Plus this crazy Democrat judge
Speaker 1: had to resigned after harboring a mster or a trade
Speaker 1: deer AGWAD gang member. It's a crazy story. Democrat judge
Speaker 1: in News Mexico had just resigned from the bench last
Speaker 1: month after immigration agents arrested this TDA gang member living
Speaker 1: at this judge's home, entered illegally in Eagle Pass, Texas,
Speaker 1: then was released on an immigration parole because the facilities
Speaker 1: were overcrowded, so it was one of those catch and
Speaker 1: release kind of guys. Then moved to New Mexico. Federal
Speaker 1: prosecutors in the District of New Mexico alledged to this
Speaker 1: twenty three year old guy named Christian Ortega Lopez illegally
Speaker 1: in possession of a firearm and has ties to guess
Speaker 1: the violent Venezuelan gang trend. Deer Agua designated as a
Speaker 1: foreign terrorist organization, so police arrested this guy executing a
Speaker 1: search warrant at the home of this New Mexico magistrate,
Speaker 1: Judge Joel Kano and his wife, Nancy Kano, former police officer,
Speaker 1: allowed Ortego Lopez to file a requests for immigration reliefs
Speaker 1: using the judge's residential address. Court exhibits also posted on
Speaker 1: social media show the foreign national posing with the judge,
Speaker 1: and these photographs are all over the place. Court records
Speaker 1: showed that Ortego Lopez Venezuela Nashal entered the United States
Speaker 1: illegally again at Eagle Pass during the peak of the
Speaker 1: Biden border crisis December of twenty twenty three, when one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty nine thousand people were caught and released
Speaker 1: in that one month, so the eagle passed. Detention facilities overcrowded,
Speaker 1: so they let him go. Social media posts obtained by
Speaker 1: the US Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico
Speaker 1: showed Ortego Lopez and other illegal aliens at a shooting range,
Speaker 1: possessing multiple firearms and a large quantity of handgun and
Speaker 1: rifle ammunition, and one image the man holding an AR
Speaker 1: fifteen rifle in one hand and a semi autgomatic pistol.
Speaker 1: In another video showed the Venezuelan migrant and possession of
Speaker 1: another AR fifteen equipped with a suppressor, fired the rifle
Speaker 1: until it was empty, then reloaded it with a new
Speaker 1: magazine and continued to fire. This accord of the statement
Speaker 1: from the US Attorney's Office. Photos of the video showed
Speaker 1: Ortego Lopez displaying gang tattoos reflecting he's a trend de
Speaker 1: Iragua member. This get his report of the Venezuelan national
Speaker 1: move to l pass so after being released by the
Speaker 1: border patrol agents, then he roomed with five other people
Speaker 1: and while living there he met Nancy Kanno, the judge's wife,
Speaker 1: and began doing some construction and handyman jobs for her,
Speaker 1: and at that point she extended an offer for this
Speaker 1: guy to move into what they call the casita behind
Speaker 1: her home. I guess it's like an outbuilding or something.
Speaker 1: Other images from Ortega Lopez his cell phone, obtained by
Speaker 1: Breitbart show graphic images of multiple decapitated and mutilated bodies.
Speaker 1: This is the kind of guy you want to invite
Speaker 1: in your house. Hey, Joe, you got any extra space
Speaker 1: in your house? Ortego Lopez currently in the Donna Ana
Speaker 1: Kunty Detention Center where he's ards with being an illegal
Speaker 1: alien in possession of firearms. At this point, it isn't
Speaker 1: clear if Judge Conna or his wife Nancy will be
Speaker 1: charged with harboring an illegal alien or providing material sport
Speaker 1: too a foreign terrorist organization. Going back to the point
Speaker 1: the caller made earlier, can that senator be charged with
Speaker 1: supporting a foreign terrorist organization by visiting the guy in
Speaker 1: prison in albert El Salvador, don'na. We'll see if he
Speaker 1: brings them back. What might happen? This is just crazy.
Speaker 1: Six forty seven fifty five kc DE talk station. They'll
Speaker 1: go away a little more to talk about before we
Speaker 1: get to Dave Williams after the top of the Hour
Speaker 1: News And at this point I get to mention Prestigian Terriers,
Speaker 1: because what a wonderful man John Ryan is and he's
Speaker 1: the guy that you'll be working with when you get
Speaker 1: in touch with Prestigian Terriers. Really really, I always like
Speaker 1: say he's a sweet guy, just so pleasant, easy to
Speaker 1: work with, and he has done so many kitchens over
Speaker 1: the past thirty five years. That's exclusively what the man does.
Speaker 1: He did our kitchen, We love it. You don't have
Speaker 1: to go to full freight, gut the whole thing and
Speaker 1: start from scratch like we did. Maybe you just want
Speaker 1: to replace cabinets and countertops. He's all right, I gotta
Speaker 1: work with for that. But whether your kitchen's big or
Speaker 1: small or anything in between, regardless of the size of
Speaker 1: the project, he's done so many he's got great ideas,
Speaker 1: he's seen it all, and he's your true partner from
Speaker 1: initial design to final installation. The only guy you need
Speaker 1: to contact with. You don't need to deal with the creuse.
Speaker 1: He takes care of everything coordination, making sure everything goes
Speaker 1: off without a hitch, so with you every step of
Speaker 1: the way, and a great guy to work with. You'll
Speaker 1: you'll find him very enjoyable to work with for kitchens,
Speaker 1: So give him a call five one three two four
Speaker 1: seven zero two two nine A plus with the BBB
Speaker 1: Prestige Interiors. You can find him online Prestige one two
Speaker 1: three dot com. That's Prestige one two three dot com.
Speaker 1: Fifty five KRC. Here's your channel nine first one and
Speaker 1: one to forecast. We have a partly cloudy to day.
Speaker 1: It'll turn mostly sunny at some point. Seventy three is
Speaker 1: going to be the high. Overnight little fifty with a
Speaker 1: few clouds, sunny skies. Tomorrow is seventy eight. A few
Speaker 1: clouds again overnight little fifty Tomorrow night than Thursday and
Speaker 1: mostly cloudy. Day was just a slight chance of rain
Speaker 1: and a highest seventy nine forty eight degrees. Right now,
Speaker 1: Time for a traffic update.
Speaker 2: From the UCL Traffic Center.
Speaker 13: If you see healthy time comprehensive care that's so personal
Speaker 13: and makes your best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care for
Speaker 13: better outcomes. Expect more a you seehealth dot com. Highway
Speaker 13: traffic continues to build the heaviest of step bend two
Speaker 13: seventy five between the Lawrence Burg Ramp and the Carroll
Speaker 13: Cropper Bridge thanks to the ongoing construction elsewhere north then
Speaker 13: seventy five just beginning to build at Kyle's Stop. Found
Speaker 13: seventy five heavyer through Walchlan Chucking Ram month fifty five
Speaker 13: care seeing the talk.
Speaker 1: Station six fifty two fifty five care CD talk station
Speaker 1: just heard that commercial for Herbert and I had asked
Speaker 1: Joyce said he's still alive. Huh, Just isn't that a
Speaker 1: tribute concert? So no, he's ninety and bully for him anyway,
Speaker 1: if you're my age, you remember when those songs were
Speaker 1: playing on the radio all the time. You need to
Speaker 1: get a real ID, and I guess the deadline is
Speaker 1: coming as fast approaching, so hurry up and get your
Speaker 1: real ID. That is, if you plan on flying American
Speaker 1: is going to need a real ID, federally compliant driver's license,
Speaker 1: or other identification that meets higher standards than your plain
Speaker 1: old state issues license in order to easily travel by air.
Speaker 1: That according to the Department of Homeland Security on their website,
Speaker 1: only legal US citizens or residents can get one of
Speaker 1: these identification cards. You can still use your passport instead
Speaker 1: of real ID for domestic air travel, but that just
Speaker 1: puts the illegal immigrants out of the running in terms
Speaker 1: of flying domestically. Now they can and get driver's licenses
Speaker 1: in a whole bunch of states. I think there's like
Speaker 1: nineteen states that allow illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses,
Speaker 1: and this has been going on for years. But when
Speaker 1: the real ID kicks in, that's not going to cut it.
Speaker 1: Domestic air travelers are in the nation illegally presently required
Speaker 1: to present a valid and updated photo ID to board
Speaker 1: a flight, but as of the believe it's the fifth
Speaker 1: of May, if I have the date correctly, that's not
Speaker 1: going to work anymore. Accord to Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 1: memo outlining Trump administration's motivation, because this was delayed for
Speaker 1: a while, they're going to enforce the real ID law
Speaker 1: to prevent those in the country illegally from flying, with
Speaker 1: the exception of self deportation on an international flight. According
Speaker 1: to the memo, under Biden, illegal aliens use non compliant
Speaker 1: IDs from sanctuary cities to board flights, but real IDs
Speaker 1: higher security standards make it nearly impossible to forge legitimate documents,
Speaker 1: ensuring only verified travelers can fly. This closes the gaping
Speaker 1: vulnerabilities Biden's policies created preventing criminals and potential terrorists from
Speaker 1: exploiting our aviation system as seen during nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: When fraudulent IDs enabled attacks DHS and TSA are clear.
Speaker 1: The only place in illegal aliens should be flying is home.
Speaker 1: Under Secretary Christy Nolmes leadership, illegal aliens will be barred
Speaker 1: from domestic flights with one exception. Illegal aliens self deporting
Speaker 1: on international flights will be allowed to board without real ID,
Speaker 1: encouraging their exit from the United States. That is again
Speaker 1: a statement directly from the memo. Now some are against this,
Speaker 1: including Congressom Massey. I don't know how the idea of
Speaker 1: election integrity came in, but Congressome Massey I mentioned this.
Speaker 1: Big brother. If you think real ideas about election integrity,
Speaker 1: you're abing to be sorely disappointed, someone has lied to you,
Speaker 1: or you're engaging in wishful thinking. Please don't shoot the messenger.
Speaker 1: Real ID is a two thousand and five George Bush
Speaker 1: era Patriot Act overreach that went completely unenforced until Trump
Speaker 1: got in office. Let me guess he's playing four D
Speaker 1: chess and I should just go along.
Speaker 4: With it.
Speaker 1: Those from a couple of Massi's posts. Anyway, onto the
Speaker 1: first Trump administration pushed back on the real ID October
Speaker 1: twenty twenty deadline because of the pandemic. But then the
Speaker 1: Biden administration did kick in the deadline, which happened to
Speaker 1: be May seventh. So if you're wondering where the deadline
Speaker 1: came in, then you can just point to the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: Whether you like real ID or not. But I've had
Speaker 1: one for years. I never really looked at it as
Speaker 1: a big brother kind of thing. I mean, they've got
Speaker 1: all the information on me that they check for real
Speaker 1: ID anyhow. But you're going to have to get one
Speaker 1: if you plan on fly six fifty six. Dave Williams
Speaker 1: coming up next, Taxpayer Protection Alliance, followed by Steve Gooden,
Speaker 1: who's going to provide a thorough and thoughtful analysis of
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court decision regarding the Venezuela and prisoners. That'll
Speaker 1: take place at seven thirty. I sure hope you can
Speaker 1: stick around covering Trump's first one hundred days.
Speaker 4: Every day we stand on the verge of the four
Speaker 4: greatest years in American history.
Speaker 17: Fifty five KRC the talk station. This report is sponsored
Speaker 17: by fifty five RCD talk station. Happy Tuesday to you.
Speaker 1: Return with Steve Gooden at the bottom of the area
Speaker 1: to give us some breakdown on the Supreme Court decision
Speaker 1: about the Venezuelan prisoners. But in the meantime, welcome back
Speaker 1: from the Taxpayer Protection Alliance Dave Williams. Always good to
Speaker 1: have you on the phone, Dave, Welcome.
Speaker 6: Good morning, Brian, a belated happy Easter and hope you
Speaker 6: had a really nice, quiet Easter.
Speaker 1: I did, and at the end of my I had
Speaker 1: a week off last week, which a mental health week
Speaker 1: off is kind of what I was calling it, because
Speaker 1: every once in a while you got to take some
Speaker 1: time to exhale, and so I was able to do
Speaker 1: that and really was enjoyable. Getting back into the gear
Speaker 1: of things has been a little challenging for me the day.
Speaker 1: It's like, you need a vacation, a week of vacation,
Speaker 1: to come off your week of vacation.
Speaker 3: So, wait, did you go to Al Savador last week?
Speaker 4: No? I did.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I try to spring some gang members in El Salvador. Yeah,
Speaker 1: seacat prison. Anyhow, Now I stayed at home and slept
Speaker 1: and stared at the back of my eyelids for real
Speaker 1: extra like the time Dave I got the biggest kick
Speaker 1: because Joe Strecker does what we call the rundown, and
Speaker 1: it shows me who's going to be on the program
Speaker 1: and also the topics that we will be discussing. Dave
Speaker 1: Williams at seven oh five, Congress utter disregard for fiscal responsibility.
Speaker 1: That's making making me laugh all morning, because you know,
Speaker 1: as long as I've been alive and I'll be sixty
Speaker 1: in September, Man, it's just been the order of business.
Speaker 1: They always disregard fiscal responsibility. But this is you're gonna
Speaker 1: have to break this down for my listeners in me
Speaker 1: because they're in the process of doing this reconciliation thing.
Speaker 1: So the Senate's got a version, their House has got
Speaker 1: a version. The Senate only is requiring four billion dollars
Speaker 1: in spending cuts. Is that four billions is the Congressional
Speaker 1: Budget Office does its budget and that's four billion over
Speaker 1: ten years.
Speaker 6: That's four billion over ten years. And that's not even
Speaker 6: a cut, No, it's not. It's it's a flesh wound
Speaker 6: as money. Python would say, you know, this is something
Speaker 6: that is very problematic because reconciliation is key to getting
Speaker 6: back to tax cuts and extending the tax cuts.
Speaker 3: So they have to do this. They have to come
Speaker 3: up with some sort of agreement.
Speaker 6: And you're right, the Senate is talking about four billion
Speaker 6: dollars over ten years now. Listen, I was offended when
Speaker 6: I saw the House was only cutting one hundred and
Speaker 6: fifty billion a year. Wow, I mean compared to the Senate.
Speaker 6: This is this isn't credible. But again, you know, so
Speaker 6: much more has to be done here.
Speaker 1: Okay, So, as you write in it's protecting taxpayers dot Org, folks,
Speaker 1: bookmarkt and pay attention with Dave and the team are
Speaker 1: doing over the Taxpayer Protection Alliance. But as you point out,
Speaker 1: it only requires four billion minimum spending on the Senate side,
Speaker 1: in stark contrast to the House's one point five trillion requirement,
Speaker 1: which you know, if you just compare the two numbers,
Speaker 1: this is a substantial difference. But we e blow through
Speaker 1: about two trillion dollars more annually than they take in.
Speaker 1: Am I right about that?
Speaker 6: Therein lies the problem is that they're not even making
Speaker 6: a dent in the deficit. And let's not even talk
Speaker 6: about the debt because the debt is going to continually
Speaker 6: increase over the next five, ten, fifteen, I mean until
Speaker 6: you know, as far down the road as we can see.
Speaker 3: And this is the time to do with Brian.
Speaker 6: We have a Republican House, a Republican Senate, and obviously
Speaker 6: a Republican in the White House. This is the time
Speaker 6: to cut spending because we have no idea what twenty
Speaker 6: twenty six is going to look like for the House
Speaker 6: or the Senate. We may never see these conditions again.
Speaker 6: And you know, listen, I like Speaker Johnson. I think
Speaker 6: he's a decent guy. He's just not bold enough. Remember
Speaker 6: back to the days of nuke Gingrich and you know,
Speaker 6: we had such stronger Speakers of the House and I
Speaker 6: just don't see that with Mike Johnson. And again, he's
Speaker 6: a nice guy, and I think he's trying to do
Speaker 6: the right thing. But we need, you know, more leadership
Speaker 6: and then stronger leadership in the House and the Senate.
Speaker 6: Four billion dollars over ten years. That's embarrassing, that's absolutely embarrassing.
Speaker 1: It is embarrassing. So you know, what I really am
Speaker 1: always looking for is what is the explanation. I mean,
Speaker 1: the Republican Party always pays lip service to being the
Speaker 1: party of fiscal responsibility. It's in their platform. They talk
Speaker 1: about it, they complain about defits, if they complain about
Speaker 1: outrageous spending, of course, thank god for Doge. At least
Speaker 1: we're getting an eye full of all the crazy crap
Speaker 1: that we labor for every day and have that money
Speaker 1: removed from our paychecks and go off to like I
Speaker 1: don't know, Sesame Street programs in Iraq or whatever. But
Speaker 1: that's just tiny little bits and pieces. I know, mind
Speaker 1: the pennies and the dollars will mind themselves. But I mean,
Speaker 1: we've got trillions of additional dollars that are spent. With
Speaker 1: all that, and all that being said, what's the explanation
Speaker 1: from at least the Republican side of the Ledger in
Speaker 1: the Senate for why they're only willing to consider cutting
Speaker 1: four billion over ten years.
Speaker 6: So John fun who's the leader of the Senate right now,
Speaker 6: said this is the best deal that they can get
Speaker 6: that they can that can pass the Senate. I mean,
Speaker 6: this is what the Republicans because the Republicans don't have
Speaker 6: the I can't say it on the air, but they
Speaker 6: don't have the intestinal fortitude exactly exactly, Well, why not.
Speaker 6: There's so many moderate Republicans that are afraid to cut
Speaker 6: spending because they think that it's going to hurt them
Speaker 6: in the polls. Now, this is the crazy part, Brian.
Speaker 6: I think that if they were bold, people would appreciate that.
Speaker 6: Look at the you mentioned DOGE. Look at the support
Speaker 6: that DOGE is getting. Look at what it's doing going
Speaker 6: through every milk and cranny of the budget and of
Speaker 6: these agencies and finding just disgusting examples of waste, fraud, abuse.
Speaker 6: And listen, this is something that Rand Paul has been
Speaker 6: doing for years. Yeah, now we actually hear about it
Speaker 6: on a daily basis, and now is the time to
Speaker 6: do this. And you know, we're potentially talking about trillions
Speaker 6: of dollars that could be cut from the federal government.
Speaker 3: And nobody would notice.
Speaker 6: Like you said, you know, Sesame Street in Iraq, all
Speaker 6: these crazy research programs, No one will notice if these
Speaker 6: programs go by by.
Speaker 1: I'm just I mean, i feel like I'm getting rid
Speaker 1: of boil over with anger because when you see this
Speaker 1: on paper, as you have it on your Taxpayer Protection
Speaker 1: Lines web page. Yeah, I just want to start, you know,
Speaker 1: slapping these people across the face metaphorically speaking. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm not a man of violence, but you know, it's like,
Speaker 1: what in God's name are you thinking? Just as you
Speaker 1: point out, this is like the only opportunity you may
Speaker 1: ever have to stop us and save us from ourselves,
Speaker 1: and you are the ones that are supposed to be
Speaker 1: saving us from ourselves, and in fact you're the one
Speaker 1: that can't save You can't save yourself. You're addicted to
Speaker 1: the spending. Is it pet projects in Republican states that
Speaker 1: they're worried about losing? I mean what, I just don't
Speaker 1: get any There's no rationale behind letting this opportunity pass
Speaker 1: up that I can figure out.
Speaker 3: No, and the American public is ready for this.
Speaker 6: I mean, you looked at the election last year, you
Speaker 6: look at what's happening with dose is that people are
Speaker 6: ready for this. They're ready for spending cuts. And you know,
Speaker 6: the last time we had this, it was called the
Speaker 6: tea Party, right, and I think we have a bit
Speaker 6: of a resurgence of it. We're not calling it the
Speaker 6: tea Party anymore. But I think people are fed up
Speaker 6: with Washington.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 6: You have a lot of these agencies that are letting
Speaker 6: people go and the only people that are complaining about
Speaker 6: this are the people in the agencies and inside the Beltway.
Speaker 3: Everyone else is like, so what, so.
Speaker 6: What if these people, you know, they have been doing
Speaker 6: nothing for years? You know a lot of these bureaucrats.
Speaker 6: Now it has to be done in a way where
Speaker 6: you know, you don't fire everyone an agency.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know. That's a little at tempting it is.
Speaker 3: Let me get back to you on that.
Speaker 1: But spends.
Speaker 6: Massive savings because if if you get rid of someone
Speaker 6: who's making one hundred thousand dollars a year, that actually
Speaker 6: multiplies over years because of their benefits and uh and
Speaker 6: down the road. So I think again, they're missing this opportunity.
Speaker 6: And I'm just I'm as frustrated as you are, because
Speaker 6: now the time to do it.
Speaker 1: Well, does the taxpayer Protection Lines reach out to the
Speaker 1: individual senators and and and give them a ton lashing
Speaker 1: or try to encourage them.
Speaker 6: In hundred percent, we are calling out the Republicans and
Speaker 6: we're saying, listen, this is the time to do it.
Speaker 6: And we you know, we are writing letters, we are
Speaker 6: going up and visiting with these offices, and we're getting
Speaker 6: a lot lot of pressure and you know, people may
Speaker 6: not know this, but so we get a lot of
Speaker 6: pressure from Republicans to support the budget, to support these bills,
Speaker 6: and we refuse to.
Speaker 3: You look at the statement we made.
Speaker 6: It was a scathing statement, you know, against the Senate
Speaker 6: and now you know, looking at the House, what they're
Speaker 6: going to do. So you know, we're taking no prisoners
Speaker 6: here and listen. We we want to support the Republicans
Speaker 6: because they say the right thing, but they don't.
Speaker 9: Do the right thing.
Speaker 3: That's it, right, Yeah, So no, we've been very.
Speaker 6: Active and very vocal on Capitol Hill trying to uh
Speaker 6: figure out what to do to have more spending cuts
Speaker 6: and really some more fiscal responsibility.
Speaker 1: It's frustrated, well, is this a call to action for
Speaker 1: my listeners? Disagreement their senators and we haven't even pivoted
Speaker 1: over to the Republican side, where it's only one point
Speaker 1: four trillion over ten years, that's not going to put
Speaker 1: really much of a dent in the in the in
Speaker 1: the fiscal reality of what's going on in the spending
Speaker 1: and the spending levels in Washington. I mean, both sides
Speaker 1: need to be get a tunnel aashing.
Speaker 6: People should be calling their member of Congress whether it's
Speaker 6: they're member of the House and a member of the Senate.
Speaker 6: They need to be calling because that's the only way
Speaker 6: this is going to change. And this is something now
Speaker 6: we've been talking for a number of years and I
Speaker 6: always say, see something, say something, you have to call
Speaker 6: your member of Congress.
Speaker 1: Well, let's get on that, folks. It's easy to do.
Speaker 1: Just get in touch with your elected officials Senate and Republicans.
Speaker 1: And I wouldn't mince my words, be quite candid with you.
Speaker 1: This is the only, maybe the only opportunity in our
Speaker 1: lifetime where we can actually bring some fiscal responsibility and
Speaker 1: stop well what it's like a death by a thousand cuts.
Speaker 1: Eventually we're not going to be able to afford what
Speaker 1: we've what what our credit card tab I mean, we're
Speaker 1: already a trillion dollars annually in interest.
Speaker 6: Dave Well and Brian think about this is if we,
Speaker 6: you know, have this problem with China so much, well,
Speaker 6: this is even more of a reason to cut spending
Speaker 6: and not be beholden to China to prop up our deficits.
Speaker 1: And prop it up. Yeah, and that's the other compy worry,
Speaker 1: because what if they quit buying our bonds?
Speaker 6: That's a whole nother conversation that's not gonna be pretty
Speaker 6: at all that Congress and the President will have to have.
Speaker 6: And that's why all these things are interconnected, and it
Speaker 6: has to start.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: Let's pause every day back about well, tax cuts. They're
Speaker 1: going to keep the tax cuts in place, and if so,
Speaker 1: how are we going to pay for them? Seven sixteen
Speaker 1: fIF you five cares of detoxtation calling Electric get in
Speaker 1: touch with Cullen for all your electric needs. You still
Speaker 1: got that sale going on for the service upgrade of
Speaker 1: Culin because apparently it's gotten really expensive to do service
Speaker 1: upgrade thanks to code changes. Code changes, yeah, last year
Speaker 1: drove the cost of a service upgrade up. So right
Speaker 1: now you get to the end of the month to
Speaker 1: take advantage of this twenty percent off the total job costs,
Speaker 1: which can save you a lot of money. Power up
Speaker 1: your home sale from Colin Electric great savings on service
Speaker 1: upgrades and it's for above or below ground reads sidential
Speaker 1: single family services four hundred amps or less and extends
Speaker 1: to breaker panel and main service upgrades. So it's a
Speaker 1: good amount of money off twenty percent. Take advantage of
Speaker 1: the savings while the sale is on. But for any
Speaker 1: electric project around your home, it's Colin Electric around since
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety nine, a plus of the better business feer.
Speaker 1: I can vouch for the work that they do all
Speaker 1: day long because they've been in my house a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of times over the years. You get a ten
Speaker 1: year wiring warranty on literally everything they do from you,
Speaker 1: from the service upgrade to the tiniest installation like an
Speaker 1: outlet or something. So you can call them up and
Speaker 1: Tom Bryant said, Hi, when you do. Andrew Cullen and
Speaker 1: his great team, they take great care of you. They're
Speaker 1: great with customer service, and the price is always right
Speaker 1: five one three two two seven four one one two
Speaker 1: Online Culling c U l E and Colin Electriccincinnati dot com.
Speaker 12: This is fifty five krc an iHeartRadio station, ZIP recruiter.
Speaker 1: H here's your Channa nine first warning weather forecast. Partly
Speaker 1: skies turning mostly sunny during the day. Seventy two is
Speaker 1: going to be the high overnight low of fifty with
Speaker 1: a few clouds. Seventy eight sunny skies Tomorrow overnight low
Speaker 1: fifty with a few clouds tomorrow night and on Thursday,
Speaker 1: we're gonna go up to seventy nine degrees, mostly cloudy
Speaker 1: all day and just a slight chance of rain forty eight.
Speaker 2: Right now, time for traffic update from the UCF Traffic Center.
Speaker 13: You see health, You'll find comprehensive care that's so personal
Speaker 13: it makes your best tomorrow possible. That's boundless care for
Speaker 13: better outcomes. Expect more at you sehealth dot com. North
Speaker 13: Beound seventy one CRUIS are working with an accident right
Speaker 13: hand side near Reading Road at traffic backing into the tunnel.
Speaker 13: It's also affecting traffic northbound fourth seventy one from Memorial
Speaker 13: northbound seventy five break rights out of Aerolbinger into the
Speaker 13: cut southbound slowed through Lachlan Chuck Ingram on fifty five
Speaker 13: kre see the talk.
Speaker 1: Station seven twenty fifty have krcity talk station find them online.
Speaker 1: Protecting Taxpayers dot org. Get is Day Williams with the
Speaker 1: taxpayer protection lines all right. Pivoting over from the spy
Speaker 1: less Republicans in the House and Senate who refused to
Speaker 1: cut spending adequately enough to save us in the future
Speaker 1: of our country. Pivoting over to taxpayers and the taxes
Speaker 1: we pay. The Donald Trump tax cuts in Job Act
Speaker 1: of twenty seventeen's getting set to expire because the spineless
Speaker 1: idiots refused to ever enact something permanent. It's an opportunity
Speaker 1: to make these cuts permanent and everyone will benefit from this.
Speaker 1: Am I wrong, Dave Williams?
Speaker 6: So have you noticed, Brian, whenever there's an increase in spending,
Speaker 6: that's permanent, right, that never expires. Whenever we cut taxes,
Speaker 6: there's always an expiration date.
Speaker 1: Tiet.
Speaker 3: I mean it should be the exact opposite.
Speaker 6: And listen, what happened in twenty seventeen was amazing because
Speaker 6: we saw the economy take off. We saw thousand dollars
Speaker 6: bonuses going out to people from corporations. And remember Nancy
Speaker 6: Pelissi mocked this thousand dollars bonuses and said, what's a
Speaker 6: thousand dollars for some buddy?
Speaker 3: Well, I mean talk about out of.
Speaker 1: Touch, yeah, said the woman with a twenty five thousand
Speaker 1: dollars refrigerator freezer during COVID eating twelve fourteen dollars a
Speaker 1: pint ice cream. That woman is so out of touch anyhow, whatever, Yeah,
Speaker 1: And so.
Speaker 6: That's why we need to make these things permanent. These
Speaker 6: tax cuts permanent for individuals and businesses. Right now, if
Speaker 6: you're an individual in twenty seventeen, you got a tax cut.
Speaker 6: It made taxes a little bit simple. Listen, I'm not
Speaker 6: gonna lie to you and say taxes are simple. But
Speaker 6: it increased the standard deduction, so a lot of people
Speaker 6: didn't have to put all the itemized deductions in to
Speaker 6: get you know, the bigger tax cut for businesses, Oh
Speaker 6: my gosh.
Speaker 3: We went from a.
Speaker 6: Forty percent corporate tax rate to a twenty one percent
Speaker 6: corporate tax rate, and you had companies flooding back into
Speaker 6: the country.
Speaker 3: Remember nineties and two thousands, the inversions.
Speaker 6: Where companies would leave this country basically on paper, right,
Speaker 6: is that Tim Horton's bought Burger King. There's a lot
Speaker 6: of different inversions that happened. Corporations left this country. They
Speaker 6: came back in twenty eighteen because of the tax code,
Speaker 6: and we saw unemployment go down.
Speaker 3: It really was. I mean, twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen
Speaker 3: two great years.
Speaker 6: Obviously twenty twenty was COVID, but it's the tax cuts
Speaker 6: have to be permanent for this economy to get going.
Speaker 1: I couldn't agree with you more. And if the tax
Speaker 1: if these tax cuts go away, I mean, everybody's going
Speaker 1: to get hit. I mean you keep hearing the Democrats
Speaker 1: scream about, you know, billionaire tax coaches, taxcoachs for millionaires,
Speaker 1: and then it's not I mean, everyone gets the benefit
Speaker 1: from this, including regular working stiffs that are out there
Speaker 1: on the lower end of the pay scale. They benefit
Speaker 1: from this. But what about the the salt deduction? My
Speaker 1: understanding is because I saw the article written by Faith
Speaker 1: Jibluco over at Taxpayer Protection Alliance about the corporate salt,
Speaker 1: which she points out would be welcome. Is there a
Speaker 1: stand under deduction that they did enjoy or should rather
Speaker 1: be subjected to that might benefit.
Speaker 6: Us or Yeah, so I think there's you know, we
Speaker 6: are not being hypocrites here because you have salt, which
Speaker 6: is a state and local tax tax that you get
Speaker 6: to deduct a certain amount that was capped at ten
Speaker 6: thousand dollars twenty seven.
Speaker 1: Because all we were doing was subsidizing high rent or
Speaker 1: high taxation states like California, New York, and New Jersey exactly.
Speaker 6: So what they're trying to do for the personal salt
Speaker 6: is to raise it to one hundred thousand dollars, which
Speaker 6: is insane, absolutely insane, would would bust the budget.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 6: Corporations are looking for what they call sea salt, the
Speaker 6: corporate state and local tax deduction. And no, if you're
Speaker 6: not going to give it to individuals, you can't give
Speaker 6: it to business. It has the same effect. And listen,
Speaker 6: we want businesses to grow. We want to give them
Speaker 6: an opportunity to grow in this country. But this is
Speaker 6: not the right way to do it. And there are
Speaker 6: so many things in the tax code right now that
Speaker 6: are disincentivizing business and we need for business.
Speaker 3: To stay here. And listen, businesses employ people.
Speaker 6: I remember remember Mitt Romney saying corporations are people, right,
Speaker 6: I mean, and he wasn't wrong though, I mean they
Speaker 6: employ you know, you look at these big tech companies
Speaker 6: that everyone hates, Well, they employ millions of people, They
Speaker 6: pay property taxes, they pay you know a fight. Could
Speaker 6: they pay all of these taxes that are actually helping
Speaker 6: the country.
Speaker 3: So we want, but it has to start with individuals.
Speaker 6: It has to start with the individual tax cuts and
Speaker 6: making sure that like you said, you know, these middle
Speaker 6: income folks that they can still enjoy these tax cuts.
Speaker 1: Well, cost of everything's going up, and of course every
Speaker 1: little bit counts, and I like to keep more money
Speaker 1: in my pocket, particularly right.
Speaker 6: And Brian and Brian remember the irs. They want to
Speaker 6: prepare your taxes now with direct files.
Speaker 3: They they want to get.
Speaker 6: All of your financial information and say, you know, don't
Speaker 6: worry about filling this out.
Speaker 3: We'll fill it out for you. We'll tell you how
Speaker 3: much you or how much of a refund.
Speaker 9: So this is what the iron is.
Speaker 6: What they want to do is prepare your taxes, which
Speaker 6: you know, I'd rather have the guy down the street
Speaker 6: that knows nothing about taxes prepare my taxes than.
Speaker 3: The Iron rests. I would trust him a lot more
Speaker 3: than bureau.
Speaker 1: Right in DC. Amen to that, brother. Amen. They can't
Speaker 1: even keep their own house in order. How many sources
Speaker 1: security numbers are still active for dead people, just among
Speaker 1: all the other things that dogs figured out. Anyhow, Dave Williams,
Speaker 1: appreciate what you do each and every day. I'll encourage
Speaker 1: my listeners again to book mark your site Protecting Taxpayers
Speaker 1: dot org and again call to arms, call your senator
Speaker 1: and your representative and scream at them and tell them
Speaker 1: to quit or cut back on spending you can get
Speaker 1: our house in order or we're all going to collapse
Speaker 1: under the weight of our debt. Dave, keep up the
Speaker 1: great work. We'll talk again soon, I hope. Thanks.
Speaker 3: Brian, have a great day you too.
Speaker 1: Coming up Steve Gooden about the Scotis decision and Venezuela
Speaker 1: and prisoners. First, where's my friends at Plump type Plumbing?
Speaker 1: You deserve better, locally owned serving the entire Tri State area.
Speaker 1: They treat every call like a neighbor asking for help.
Speaker 1: That's what Plump Tight is all about. That's my go
Speaker 1: to plumbers and they've helped me out on many occasions,
Speaker 1: including emergencies. I always joke about that raining chandelier issue
Speaker 1: I had. Of course, they enjoining aplus with a better
Speaker 1: business bureau. You can trust them for ethical business practices,
Speaker 1: transparency and commitment to your satisfaction. You got a drain problem,
Speaker 1: plump type plumbing. You got a water pressure problem, plump
Speaker 1: type plumbing, sump pump maybe went out. Plump type plumbing
Speaker 1: to temperature fluctuation, pipe integrity. I mean, they do it
Speaker 1: all and they are the Tri States leader number one
Speaker 1: installer of tankless water heaters, which just gives you unlimited
Speaker 1: hot water. So that's a really neat thing. And they've
Speaker 1: been at this for a long long time. You know,
Speaker 1: tankless water heaters last twenty plus years compared to like
Speaker 1: ten or fifteen years for traditional tanks. Got a lot
Speaker 1: more longevity out of that, but just a handful of
Speaker 1: the services they offer. But for all plumbing needs for
Speaker 1: your house, plumtight dot com is where you find them online.
Speaker 4: T I T E.
Speaker 1: Plump tight dot com five one three seven two seven
Speaker 1: tight that's five one three seven two seven eighty four
Speaker 1: eighty three.
Speaker 5: Fifty five KRC tariffs and your money week it is
Speaker 5: seven point thirty I fifty five KCD talk station.
Speaker 1: A very happy Tuesday to you. Thank God for Steve
Speaker 1: good In a law firm a porter Right and find
Speaker 1: them online at porter right dot com. Steve is our
Speaker 1: legal analyst. And I know, yes I am a lawyer,
Speaker 1: but some things, like the peace of God, they pass
Speaker 1: all human understanding. And that's when we bring Steve in
Speaker 1: when it comes to matters of law that are like
Speaker 1: the peace of God, like the Supreme Court's decision the
Speaker 1: other day temporarily UH barring the government from removing Venezuela
Speaker 1: and men under the alien Enemy Zach. Welcome back, Steve,
Speaker 1: good and appreciate you being on the program today.
Speaker 4: Good morning. I can't live up to the peace of God.
Speaker 1: Part, but I'll do my best. Hey, you don't have
Speaker 1: to adopt my my word. That's just the way I feel,
Speaker 1: because I, in fact, was very confused by all of this.
Speaker 1: So let's start with the core issue here. We'd start
Speaker 1: with the Alien Enemies Act seventeen ninety eight, law that
Speaker 1: allows the president to detain her deport citizens of an
Speaker 1: enemy nation without a hearing or any other review by
Speaker 1: a court if Congress declares war or or there is
Speaker 1: an invasion or predatory incursion. Now, apparently the law has
Speaker 1: only have been invoked three times, one including the detention
Speaker 1: of Japanese citizens, which I'm fining to be you know,
Speaker 1: offensive and unconstitutional. But that's the law he enacted to
Speaker 1: deal with this, these these these gang members, or he
Speaker 1: asserted this law in an effort to deport them. So,
Speaker 1: as I understand the Alien Enemies Act, if you are
Speaker 1: if you fall under a declaration of the Alien Enemies Act,
Speaker 1: you're not entitled to a hearing. You just you can
Speaker 1: just get chucked out of the country.
Speaker 4: Is that right, Well, I'll give you the the lawyerly
Speaker 4: answer sort of or maybe. And I think that's really
Speaker 4: and it's in that gray area that the Supreme Court
Speaker 4: fell on Saturday night when they grand an injunction and
Speaker 4: actually stopped deportations under the Act. And a lot of
Speaker 4: it really goes down to what the definition of a
Speaker 4: criminal or a terrorist is. So you know this is
Speaker 4: a scenario, Like you said, the Alien Enemies Act has
Speaker 4: been with us since seventeen ninety eight until I've been
Speaker 4: used a handful of times, and it's very clear in
Speaker 4: a scenario where there actually is a congressional declaration of war,
Speaker 4: we have people on our soil. Those folks can just
Speaker 4: be summarily removed without a hearing. But if you're under
Speaker 4: this kind of second prong of the Alien Enemies Act,
Speaker 4: the question becomes, are you really dealing with the terrorist organization?
Speaker 4: And I guess the Court's question is in the American
Speaker 4: Civil Liberties Union question is you know these people are
Speaker 4: being removed. There is no declaration of war. We are
Speaker 4: not at war with Venezuela. There clearly has been an
Speaker 4: almost organized kind of movement for these folks to come
Speaker 4: into the country. There's clear evidence I think of, you know,
Speaker 4: a peddling gang activity, of organized drug dealing, of fetanyl dealing,
Speaker 4: all of these things, but there's really never been an
Speaker 4: Act of Congress declaring it. There's never been a Supreme
Speaker 4: Court decision declaring it. And some of these individuals are
Speaker 4: now saying, well, you know, wait a minute, we're really
Speaker 4: not part of MS thirteen. We're not a terrorist, we're
Speaker 4: not a criminal, you know. And the Trump folks are
Speaker 4: really sort of just just shoving them out and putting
Speaker 4: them on the planes regardless. And it's a tough thing
Speaker 4: because I mean, obviously this is one of the areas
Speaker 4: where Trump has the largest, the biggest mandate. I think
Speaker 4: one of the things that when you look at the polling,
Speaker 4: there's a lot of folks that have a lot of
Speaker 4: questions about Trump, but even a lot of people on
Speaker 4: the left degree that we should not have drug dealers,
Speaker 4: gang members and people like that who are from foreign
Speaker 4: countries on our soil. They should get kicked out. So
Speaker 4: this all circles around their due process rights. Should they
Speaker 4: have due process rights and shouldn't they get a little
Speaker 4: hearing where we have to prove the government has to
Speaker 4: prove that they are in fact criminals and terrorists, and
Speaker 4: that is the basis of the court's ruling saying, hey,
Speaker 4: we got to stop these until we come up with
Speaker 4: the process.
Speaker 1: Well, the declaration did not say Venezuelans. It said the
Speaker 1: gang members MS thirteen or trade Dat or Agua, whatever
Speaker 1: the gang members are, they're the ones that were going
Speaker 1: after They're the ones that essentially are invading and causing
Speaker 1: all this criminal activity. So it's a subset of the
Speaker 1: broader ven as well and immigrant population, right.
Speaker 4: Right, absolutely, And I think that's why you see Trump
Speaker 4: out on TV really pushing you know, you have them
Speaker 4: standing there in the Noble Office of some photos, particular
Speaker 4: this Garcia guy up at Maryland that has become a
Speaker 4: real flashpoint saying no, look he has this gang tattoo
Speaker 4: on his hand. And again the cat and I'm playing
Speaker 4: Devil's Avgate here, but so is the ACOU and in
Speaker 4: these cases argument as well. You know, some of these
Speaker 4: folks had to get these tattoos just to get by
Speaker 4: in Venezuela. You know, they're seeking asylum some of them
Speaker 4: at least. These are the arguments that are being made,
Speaker 4: and it just it's it becomes like they're trying.
Speaker 1: To make it really murky.
Speaker 4: Factually, they've got very good lawyers who are sort of
Speaker 4: advancing these sort of factual arguments saying, no, these folks
Speaker 4: really aren't gang members, or maybe they're former gang members
Speaker 4: who don't want to go back to Venezuela and will
Speaker 4: be killed because they left the gang. These are the
Speaker 4: kinds of factual questions that they're raising, trying to kind
Speaker 4: of throw enough sand in the air to stop the deportations,
Speaker 4: and it's a tough thing. And it also sort of
Speaker 4: intersects with this issue about national injunctions, because we had
Speaker 4: this judge Boston who was a up in DC who
Speaker 4: tried to stop the deportations everywhere, and then the Supreme
Speaker 4: Court sort of neutered him and said, no, you can
Speaker 4: only rule on them in the DC area. But they
Speaker 4: didn't then ask the different district courts to put together
Speaker 4: some sort of due process, some sort of hearing process,
Speaker 4: and then the courts down in Texas to ignored that,
Speaker 4: and here we got the injunction.
Speaker 1: All right, well we'll bring you back because we need
Speaker 1: to break down a little bit more along these lines.
Speaker 1: But you're so far, so great. Is typically a case
Speaker 1: with Steve Gooden from Port to Right talking about the
Speaker 1: current status of our efforts to deport really evil people.
Speaker 1: We're talking about gang members, mostly notably from Venezuela and
Speaker 1: running into a whole host of legal challenges. Now, there
Speaker 1: was a Supreme if I recall correctly, Stevens, gonna have
Speaker 1: to help me out of my recollection because all these lawsuits,
Speaker 1: they're just coming at you like a mile a minute.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court recently held that, going along back to
Speaker 1: our conversation about are these folks really gang members rather
Speaker 1: than just Venezuelan's generally speaking, who may have an argument
Speaker 1: that they're allowed to stay here? Maybe not, But then
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court rule that there must be a determination
Speaker 1: of their gang affiliation before they can be deported under
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemy I.
Speaker 4: Think a strong one is let us look at this.
Speaker 4: Deportations is a foreign policy issue, and that's why they
Speaker 4: have invoked the Alien Enemies Act. This is a mass migration,
Speaker 4: There is criminality involved, there are particularly terroristic activities involved.
Speaker 4: This is a foreign policy issue. That's why you see
Speaker 4: Marco Rubio out front on this more than anyone else
Speaker 4: in the administration, and the typically people look at these
Speaker 4: deportations as a domestic issue, an immigration issue. They're saying, no,
Speaker 4: this is a foreign policy issue. And the importance of
Speaker 4: that legally is that courts are supposed to defer to
Speaker 4: the administrative branch or the executive branch on foreign policy issues.
Speaker 4: So they thought that would set up a more generous
Speaker 4: sort of or less robust review by the courts. And contrast,
Speaker 4: you have folks like the American Civil Liberties Union and
Speaker 4: some of the individual immigration groups who are saying, you know,
Speaker 4: these folks factually still have to be proven in some
Speaker 4: sort of a hearing, not a true criminal hearing, but
Speaker 4: some sort of a hearing that they actually our criminals,
Speaker 4: gang members, terraced, whatever it is. There needs to be
Speaker 4: some factual showing some evidence, something taken under oath, an
Speaker 4: affidavit from an IMS agent, something to prove it before
Speaker 4: they're put on the plane and shipped out of the country.
Speaker 4: And that's where the Court has been wrestling for months,
Speaker 4: but has finally kind of come down on the side
Speaker 4: of the Venezuelan pro Venezuelan groups and saying we've got
Speaker 4: to come up with some sort of a hearing here.
Speaker 11: Now.
Speaker 4: Of course, Congress could have acted they have not at
Speaker 4: this point, so it's going to be something that the
Speaker 4: judges just sort of crapped out a whole cloth. So
Speaker 4: we're in a very you know, yet again with Trump,
Speaker 4: we're in a very unusual constitutional space. He is being
Speaker 4: very aggressive in the use of his executive powers, and
Speaker 4: he's saying, look, I don't have to It doesn't say
Speaker 4: hearings in the US Code annotated. There's no reference to
Speaker 4: a hearing there under the Alien's Edition acted. The very
Speaker 4: short thing, I'm going to put them on a plane
Speaker 4: and send them south. And finally the Supreme Court has
Speaker 4: said not so fast.
Speaker 1: The libertarian in me is going to be quick to
Speaker 1: point out there is a due process clause in the Constitution.
Speaker 1: Has the Alien Enemies Act ever been challenged on the
Speaker 1: grounds that it denies due process? And I think, for example,
Speaker 1: the internment of Japanese US citizens during World War Two.
Speaker 1: I mean, these were not Japanese nationals. They just happened
Speaker 1: to be of Japanese descent, and guess they were hearded
Speaker 1: up and packed away in camps without due process. So
Speaker 1: is the Alien Enemies Act in and of itself something
Speaker 1: that may be challenged on the grounds that it's unconstitutional.
Speaker 4: Well, Bright, I think you are some like you're ready
Speaker 4: to argue with the US Supreme Court. That is exactly
Speaker 4: the issue. Citizenship is exactly the issue that is being
Speaker 4: argued on both sides. You know. The Trump administration's argument
Speaker 4: is that the Alien Sedition Act simpler, or that the
Speaker 4: due process clause simply does not apply to non citizens,
Speaker 4: that if you're not a citizen, you don't get a hearing.
Speaker 4: You're you know, you're here but the grace of God
Speaker 4: and our im authorities, and we can just send you home.
Speaker 4: And if you look back at the Japanese and tournament cases,
Speaker 4: you're right, those all in the big Supreme Court case
Speaker 4: relating to that all turned on the idea that these
Speaker 4: folks were citizens and were entitled to some due process
Speaker 4: and shouldn't have been just sent to those camps. That
Speaker 4: they should have been accorded some sort of opportunity to
Speaker 4: tell whether or not they were loyal to the United States.
Speaker 4: As it turns out, you know, the vast majority of
Speaker 4: them indeed were, so you know, that is a stain
Speaker 4: on the country, and they shouldn't have just been rounded
Speaker 4: up because they had some sort of Japanese lineage. Here
Speaker 4: we have folks who are not citizens. In this question
Speaker 4: is what process do you get as a non citizen?
Speaker 4: And that's what the courts are wrestling with, and frankly,
Speaker 4: it looks like they're going to make up. They're going
Speaker 4: to make something up. It's basically what they seem to
Speaker 4: signal over Easter weekend is you know, we're going to
Speaker 4: take this up and we're going to come up with
Speaker 4: some sort of a test since Congress has not. So
Speaker 4: that's that's sort of where it's shaking out. We're in
Speaker 4: sort of a this on deportations that relate to this criminality,
Speaker 4: gang membership, terrorist kind of idea. It looks like they're
Speaker 4: on hold. And of course the next question is whether
Speaker 4: the Trump administration acknowledges the order, which there are some
Speaker 4: indications they may ignore it.
Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be I suppose, some sort of
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis potentially in and of itself. So the midnight
Speaker 1: order from the Supreme Court that just puts things on hold.
Speaker 1: I think they're waiting for a lower court to actually
Speaker 1: act on the factual record that they're dealing with. They
Speaker 1: seem to be they lacked enough information to actually rule
Speaker 1: on it. I got the impression with this midnight order
Speaker 1: that was unusual, right, I mean.
Speaker 4: The way these work, and this is one of the
Speaker 4: things that people sort of hate about our legal system.
Speaker 4: I mean, the Trump administration did not get to put
Speaker 4: on their case to the contrary. I mean, this was
Speaker 4: an emergency belief. The ACLU lawyers came in I think
Speaker 4: it was on a Saturday morning, made their pitch, showed
Speaker 4: what they believed to be some evidence of people who
Speaker 4: were not gang members who were being deported and caught
Speaker 4: up in these suites. Whether that's accurate or not, nobody knows.
Speaker 4: The Trump administration, because it was an emergency situation, was
Speaker 4: not allowed to present evidence to the contrary, so we
Speaker 4: don't know. So there is going to be a more
Speaker 4: full hearing and review of the evidence. This all relates
Speaker 4: to a district in North Texas. It looks like most
Speaker 4: other judicial districts in the federal system were trying to
Speaker 4: cobble together some sort of process by which there'd be
Speaker 4: determination of whether these folks were gang members, But the
Speaker 4: North District of Texas just really was taking a hands
Speaker 4: off approach, and the deportations were set to resume I
Speaker 4: think on Monday, so that's why the ACLU took them
Speaker 4: to court.
Speaker 1: And I understand part of the reason was that they
Speaker 1: the adminted Trump administration claims that these guys got a
Speaker 1: notice and had a time to assert this habeas corpus
Speaker 1: proceeding or otherwise retain counsel to make an argument that
Speaker 1: they weren't gang members, but they didn't act on it,
Speaker 1: and ergo, the Trump administration had fulfilled its obligations and
Speaker 1: they were that it was okay then to deport them.
Speaker 4: Right, I mean, I think, and I will say, in
Speaker 4: fairness to the a c OU I think what happened
Speaker 4: was the Trump people gave them a notice and said, hey,
Speaker 4: it's time to go have the have the hearings. But
Speaker 4: then the local court system just never set the hearings, right,
Speaker 4: so they kind of notice and saying, oh, you're going
Speaker 4: to get some sort of opportunity here to at least
Speaker 4: argue you're not a terrorist or a gang member. And
Speaker 4: then in the Northern District of Texas is like, well,
Speaker 4: we're not doing that. It was a bit rush, you know, exactly,
Speaker 4: So then they said then then they literally had the
Speaker 4: planes I guess gassed up to leave a Monday morning,
Speaker 4: it's like, well, it's too bad. If the court can't
Speaker 4: fit you in, you're going, You're good. I guess you
Speaker 4: go to El Salvador's or they're sitting everybody so soy.
Speaker 4: That's that's really kind of where it fell. And you know,
Speaker 4: there's some indication that that some of the other judicial
Speaker 4: lower lower federal courts are going to step in and
Speaker 4: and kind of craft a process that maybe the Supreme
Speaker 4: Court will buy off on. So this may turn out
Speaker 4: to be a skirmish that it doesn't have as big
Speaker 4: a you know, an impact as it might seem. I mean,
Speaker 4: everyone may you know, cooler heads may prevail. They may
Speaker 4: come up with some sort of kind of expedited hearing
Speaker 4: process to look at these individuals. But I think the
Speaker 4: biggest issue is whether Trump just straight up defies the
Speaker 4: orders and whether or not we end up in some
Speaker 4: sort of criminal contempt scenario with with folks at the
Speaker 4: Homeland Justice or Homeland Security and State Department are who
Speaker 4: are who are making these deportations happen?
Speaker 1: All right, And finally, since you brought it up moment ago,
Speaker 1: we'll just go a little bit over here. The whole
Speaker 1: concept of national injunctions and it does seem sort of
Speaker 1: crazy that some random judge in a district court and
Speaker 1: some remote part of the United States can issue an
Speaker 1: injunction that impacts the entirety of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Do we need legislation jurisdictional limitations? And I know the
Speaker 1: Congress was considering doing that, but can the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: deal with that on its own or is it going
Speaker 1: to require an Act of Congress to sort of curb
Speaker 1: the scope of the authority of these history court judges.
Speaker 4: Well, either could happen. It looks like both are happening,
Speaker 4: and I think, thank God that the day of the
Speaker 4: national injunction is coming to an end. They get Sendedtor
Speaker 4: grass Leaf, for Myowa did introduce a bill to get
Speaker 4: rid of them. And really what they are just kind
Speaker 4: of injunctions is the fancy term for a restreaming order
Speaker 4: and the idea that a federal judge in one part
Speaker 4: of the country can issue an injunction or streaming order
Speaker 4: against the federal federal policy that applies to all fifty
Speaker 4: states and Guam and territories. I mean, that's sort of
Speaker 4: absurd because it does encourage justice shopping, and here we'd
Speaker 4: only had eleven, I think or twelve national injunctions prior
Speaker 4: in our history. We've had eighty four since Trump took
Speaker 4: office in sixteen. So it can tell you how politicized
Speaker 4: that process can be. But the Court did send a
Speaker 4: signal to this judge up in DC who had tried
Speaker 4: to issue a national injunction against all of these deportations
Speaker 4: based on the Alien Enemies Act. They did say, hey,
Speaker 4: look something like this constitutional question like this, you can
Speaker 4: only issue a restraining order in your district. You can't
Speaker 4: do a national one. So the Court did signal that
Speaker 4: they you know, they not as a matter of policy yet,
Speaker 4: but they did kind of clip this guy's wings and say,
Speaker 4: on something like this, you can't do that. So I
Speaker 4: think that day is ending. I would I suspect there
Speaker 4: will be some bipartisan support for ending this in Congress
Speaker 4: because you know, just simply put, it could be you know,
Speaker 4: it could be abused by either side, right, we know
Speaker 4: judge shopping goes on. We know, you know, because of
Speaker 4: the way these judges are appointed, you have some idea
Speaker 4: what their political leanings may be based on the appointment
Speaker 4: the appointed. They were appointed by the president, so you know,
Speaker 4: obviously you're if you're the ac OU, you're looking for
Speaker 4: a Biden or an Obama or a Colton appointee and
Speaker 4: hoping that you're going to get a better outcome. So
Speaker 4: and that's not good for anything. It's not good for
Speaker 4: the rule of law. And hopefully that's coming to an end.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you and I both know plane employers are really
Speaker 1: good at judge shopping cases exactly.
Speaker 4: Steve.
Speaker 1: Good God bless you, sir. I can't thank you enough
Speaker 1: for coming to the program of breaking this down for
Speaker 1: all of us, including me, and you do such a
Speaker 1: really good job. And I'll look forward to having you
Speaker 1: back on and maybe hopefully with some really good news
Speaker 1: next time in the area of law and litigation, if
Speaker 1: it was.
Speaker 4: There is no good news in litigation, Brian, It's just
Speaker 4: it's all. That's the point of litigation is the seple
Speaker 4: fighting and squabbling and arguing. It's endless.
Speaker 1: That's how you get the bills up, right there, Hours build,
Speaker 1: hours build, God bless you, Steve. Keep up the great
Speaker 1: work at Porter. Al Right, we'll have you on again
Speaker 1: real soon. Take care of yourself, my friend. It is
Speaker 1: seven fifty three fifty five kre CE Detalk Station nine percent.
Speaker 1: If you look at the worst month under the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: I think that was December of twenty twenty three, where
Speaker 1: one hundred and roughly one hundred and ninety thousand people
Speaker 1: were caught and released into the country. And this past
Speaker 1: month it was twenty twenty so huge one administration, James.
Speaker 1: We didn't new legislation happening to be passed, just we
Speaker 1: needed a new administration. So clearly Trump has had a
Speaker 1: profound and tremendous impact on that. Now he's busily trying
Speaker 1: to get rid of the worst of the worst of
Speaker 1: the illegal immigrants that came in, most notably like the
Speaker 1: MS thirteen gang members and the Trendy or Agua gang members.
Speaker 1: But as you note, they seen, at least currently under
Speaker 1: the courts system, have more rights than US citizens these days.
Speaker 11: Bob, I'll tell you what is alarming that's going on,
Speaker 11: as these activist federal judges that think they have power
Speaker 11: to set foreign policy for the United States, that think
Speaker 11: they have the power to interfere with the president's lawful
Speaker 11: authority to deport criminal illegal aliens, and just keep stepping
Speaker 11: all over this. Even in the United States Supreme Court
Speaker 11: this week came back and stopped the deportation of these
Speaker 11: Venezuelan migrants. That this is absolute insanity, and we've got
Speaker 11: to figure out a way to get these judges is
Speaker 11: back into their role, which this is clearly not. But
Speaker 11: you know, you mentioned the type of people that we're
Speaker 11: talking about here, these hyper violent Venezuelan prison gang Trendy
Speaker 11: I Ragua gang members, the MS thirteen Salvadoran gang who
Speaker 11: have been here for a long time. You know, the
Speaker 11: first Trump administration did a great job of knocking those
Speaker 11: people back and really stopping what was going on in
Speaker 11: the Obama administration with MS thirteen all over the country.
Speaker 11: And then you know, during the Biden administration, the Trendy
Speaker 11: Aragua thing took off in twenty twenty three when the
Speaker 11: Venezuelan government started dumping their prisons. So it really has
Speaker 11: been an interesting time since January twentieth. It's hard to
Speaker 11: believe it'll be one hundred days this week, and it
Speaker 11: seems like it seems like it's been almost forever at
Speaker 11: this point. The drastic overnight change of putting a president
Speaker 11: into office that has the will power and the desire
Speaker 11: to secure the American border and deport illegal aliens who've
Speaker 11: been into the country illegally. That has dropped it, as
Speaker 11: you mentioned, yeah, from the peak, and.
Speaker 1: All the polling reflects this. You know, closing the borders
Speaker 1: is what the American people want, and the Democrats I
Speaker 1: just and so baffled by their resistance to this, the
Speaker 1: idea that you know, Chris van Hollands going down to
Speaker 1: visit an MS thirteen gang member in El Salvor to
Speaker 1: try to bring him back. He entered the country illegally,
Speaker 1: he's already been determined to be a gang member, but
Speaker 1: then he's taken all these extra steps to try to
Speaker 1: bring him back, just as you know he's a family man.
Speaker 1: Well you know, if he's such a great family man,
Speaker 1: why does his wife try to get a restraining order
Speaker 1: concusing him of beating her. I mean, it's it's like
Speaker 1: I just am so puzzled on why this seems to
Speaker 1: be a hill that they want to die on.
Speaker 11: Well, it Trump derangement syndrome once again going on. And so,
Speaker 11: because President Trump wants to secure the border, Democrats have
Speaker 11: to be against it. President Trump wants to deport criminal
Speaker 11: illegal aliens, Democrats have to.
Speaker 4: Be against it.
Speaker 11: President Trump wants to protect women from men participating in
Speaker 11: athletic sports, causing them injury and suffering, and you just
Speaker 11: basically destroying Title nine. Democrats have to be against that,
Speaker 11: and so that just continues throughout his foreign policy, throughout
Speaker 11: his domestic policy, and throughout his border security policy. If
Speaker 11: he's in favor of it, they're going to be against it.
Speaker 11: Even though ten years ago, you know, President Obama was
Speaker 11: very adamant about that we had to secure the border.
Speaker 11: Even though he didn't do a very good job at it,
Speaker 11: he at least acknowledged that the problem was there. Biden,
Speaker 11: you know, just opened the doors and intentionally invited millions
Speaker 11: of people to come into the United States and we
Speaker 11: were still suffering that the criminal consequences of all of
Speaker 11: this well, and.
Speaker 1: You know, Democrats lost a lot of voters as a
Speaker 1: consequence of the cities being overrun by illegal immigrants. I mean,
Speaker 1: the school systems were overrun, the living and housing issues
Speaker 1: were exacerbated, the millions, if not billions of collective dollars
Speaker 1: that had to be thrown at dealing with the illegal
Speaker 1: immigrant population. I mean, there were some angry, angry Democrats
Speaker 1: in Chicago and New York and on the West Coast.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's as if they can't see the forest
Speaker 1: for the trees. They live in their own echo chamber
Speaker 1: and don't observe the damage that they have done and
Speaker 1: actually damage they did to their own party.
Speaker 11: Well, and you know, hats off to my Governor Greg
Speaker 11: Abbott here in Texas. You know, he really changed the
Speaker 11: national dialogue on this when he started this bussing program
Speaker 11: and in twenty twenty one to take migrants from Eco
Speaker 11: Pass in Del Rio, Texas who were crossing by the
Speaker 11: thousands each day and bussing them up to New York City, Washington,
Speaker 11: d C, Denver, Los Angeles, Philadelphia. And it made those
Speaker 11: mayors wake up and see what was going on and
Speaker 11: put the cost that we've been bearing here in Texas
Speaker 11: for decades, put that cost onto their back. And now
Speaker 11: you see Mayor Eric Adams coming out and actually supporting
Speaker 11: ICE and making you know, it's it's a sad day
Speaker 11: that US mayor has to say that ICE is not
Speaker 11: a criminal organization. You know, why is that even necessary
Speaker 11: for somebody to say, Well, it's because of the language
Speaker 11: of people like Senator Van Holland who go out and
Speaker 11: say that ICE is kidnapping people off the streets.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you know, you get to with hindsight, we
Speaker 1: could to reflect back on this. And I remember early
Speaker 1: on in the Biden administration they were denying that the
Speaker 1: that there was even an open border, when the likes
Speaker 1: of Bright barton Fox News are the only ones down
Speaker 1: there with cameras filming it and showing America the reality
Speaker 1: of what was happening literally every day. I mean, it
Speaker 1: collectively lied to and always makes me wonder what nefarious
Speaker 1: motive was behind this? As you point out, they were
Speaker 1: emptying their prisons out and facilitating their arrival at the
Speaker 1: southern border. This wasn't just it didn't happen by a
Speaker 1: magic trick. This was actually organized and done with calculation.
Speaker 1: And why do we allow it to happen? I'm just
Speaker 1: still puzzled.
Speaker 4: By that, Brian.
Speaker 11: It was an intentional action by the Biden administration. They
Speaker 11: were told by the outgoing Trump administration what would happen
Speaker 11: if they changed these policies that Trump had put in
Speaker 11: place that were highly successful. They had reduced border crossings
Speaker 11: by ninety percent at the low point, and they told them,
Speaker 11: you know, if you change these policies, this is what's
Speaker 11: going to happen. Well they did, and literally thirty days
Speaker 11: later we started seeing the massive increases in border numbers,
Speaker 11: peaking in December of twenty twenty three, when about two
Speaker 11: hundred and fifty thousand people across the border, the southern border,
Speaker 11: not counting the northern border, the southern border illegally and
Speaker 11: in that month. And one of those who crossed that
Speaker 11: month was this guy, Christian Ortega Lopez, who entered through
Speaker 11: Eagle Pass and ends up eventually living with a district
Speaker 11: magistrate judge, you know, in Los cruzs, New Mexico.
Speaker 3: What is up with that?
Speaker 1: I read that story, Bob, I could not believe that that.
Speaker 1: I mean, the guy was He's on all kinds of
Speaker 1: YouTube videos, are filming himself with machine guns and high
Speaker 1: powered weapons, and he's not even legally allowed to own
Speaker 1: a firearm in this country since he's an illegal immigrant.
Speaker 1: He is a gang member and ends up living at
Speaker 1: magistrate Judge Joel Kano and his wife Nancy's house. They
Speaker 1: got pictures of them standing there like their family members together.
Speaker 11: Oh and there's some other pictures that have come out
Speaker 11: here since we've published this arder. We were the first
Speaker 11: one nationally to break this story.
Speaker 9: The s R.
Speaker 11: I saw it written about it, and then you know,
Speaker 11: it just took off. It's such a ridiculous story showing
Speaker 11: how these democrats just totally disregard the law. You know,
Speaker 11: this is blatant. His wife meets this guy in El Paso,
Speaker 11: which we knew then was a hub of trendy Aragua
Speaker 11: gang activity, human trafficking, arms trafficking, all these kinds of things,
Speaker 11: and somehow thinks that this would be a great guy
Speaker 11: to invite to their house to do construction work and
Speaker 11: handyman work and hang out with their daughter. And you know,
Speaker 11: there's photos out now of them literally sitting around dinner
Speaker 11: tables together as one big, happy family. And he's he's
Speaker 11: an ex cop, he knows what the law is. He's
Speaker 11: a judge, and he's giving this guy access to AR fifteen's,
Speaker 11: to handguns, taking them out to the range, going shooting,
Speaker 11: drinking margarita's with them, flashing gang signs, you know, and
Speaker 11: he's got the tattoos all over his body. There's no
Speaker 11: question that that he's he's a trendy Aragua gang member.
Speaker 11: And yet this judge just thinks that's okay. Well, I've
Speaker 11: got news for him. I hope the US Attorney in
Speaker 11: the District of New Mexico will bring charges against him
Speaker 11: at least for harboring an illegal alien and and maybe
Speaker 11: even they need to look at, uh charging him with
Speaker 11: with providing material.
Speaker 4: Support to a foreign terrorist organization, which is you.
Speaker 11: Know, the Trump administration designated them Trendy Aragua as a
Speaker 11: foreign terrorist group.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I had that that question was burning in
Speaker 1: the back of my mind. So I'm glad you brought
Speaker 1: it up because certainly was going to ask you about this.
Speaker 1: Just because he resigned from the bench, that does not
Speaker 1: mean his and his wife's troubles are over yet.
Speaker 11: Oh, absolutely not. And you know, I think more is
Speaker 11: going to come out of this. I don't know if
Speaker 11: if any of this arms trafficking was going on with
Speaker 11: this guy, but you know, he's certainly surrounding himself with
Speaker 11: guns and uh, you know, just what are they up to?
Speaker 4: What is it? Guy? Possibly?
Speaker 11: I still can't wrap my head around it, you know
Speaker 11: it it's this liberal mentality that we have to take
Speaker 11: care of these poor, you know, disgruntled illegal aliens who
Speaker 11: come here with this tragic story from other countries all
Speaker 11: around the world, you know, and invites him into his home,
Speaker 11: has him, has him hanging out with his daughter, you know,
Speaker 11: and I can't I can't get it.
Speaker 1: I can't get it as as the parent of a daughter. No,
Speaker 1: that's not going to happen.
Speaker 4: I mean, yeah, me too.
Speaker 1: Well, you know there's there's some maybe out there screaming
Speaker 1: at the lady of going well, you know, at least
Speaker 1: he opened his house to one of these displaced, poor
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants, you know, because there has been that argument
Speaker 1: made many times. You know, well, you're the governor or,
Speaker 1: you're the mayor of the city of Chicago. You've got
Speaker 1: lots of room in your giant and mayrill mansion once
Speaker 1: you let some of them live in your place. I
Speaker 1: mean there's been those arguments made a lot, and so
Speaker 1: maybe he's of that mindset. Well, at least I'm providing
Speaker 1: a space for them, and so you can't criticize me
Speaker 1: for doing what we're asking everyone else to do, which
Speaker 1: was shoulder the burden. But you know, the fact that
Speaker 1: he's a gang member and they're providing you with firearms
Speaker 1: just and adds an extra element of just frankly creepiness
Speaker 1: to the whole story.
Speaker 11: Yeah, that's the over the top part. I Okay, if
Speaker 11: you want to say, okay, we're we're housing these people
Speaker 11: because they need someplace to go, Okay, maybe, yeah, But
Speaker 11: giving them semi automatic rifles and pistols and taking them
Speaker 11: out to the range shooting, and you know, that is
Speaker 11: just it's mind blowing, It really is. And you know,
Speaker 11: it was fun writing this story. I pulled up the
Speaker 11: court documents, the federal court documents on and got a
Speaker 11: lot more information than the Albuquerque Journal had access to.
Speaker 11: But it really was shocking how deep this was and
Speaker 11: he integrated, he was into their lives there, and you know,
Speaker 11: like I said before, there's no doubt that he knew
Speaker 11: what was going on, that this guy's a trend Ragua
Speaker 11: Foreign Terrorist Organization gang member and he's putting up with it.
Speaker 11: He not putting up with it, he set it up
Speaker 11: and living the dream.
Speaker 1: Well, Bob Price, I noticing your reporting on this.
Speaker 4: One.
Speaker 1: Other really creepy element of this is images from his
Speaker 1: cell phone, this Ortego Lopez, a cell phone that you
Speaker 1: obtained Breitbart showed graphic images of multiple decapitated and mutilated bodies.
Speaker 1: What the hell's was that?
Speaker 11: Yeah, that that just shows the mentality of this individual
Speaker 11: or Taga Lopez who who there was at least two,
Speaker 11: there may have been more than that. It was hard
Speaker 11: to distinguish, but decapitated, mutilated, bloody bodies on his cell
Speaker 11: phone images. And I don't know if he had anything
Speaker 11: to do with those things, or if there was something
Speaker 11: that somebody else had sent to him and they were
Speaker 11: sharing in the fund, you know what the situation is.
Speaker 11: But but this shows the mentality of these trendy Aragua
Speaker 11: gang members that think this is something to celebrate, these decays.
Speaker 11: You know, we see it all the time in Mexico
Speaker 11: with cartels, the Zetas and and you know beltren Lava
Speaker 11: and the Santa Looa cartel, Cartel Jalisco New Generation. Those
Speaker 11: people are hyper violent. They put the Middle Eastern terrorists
Speaker 11: to shame. They can look like amateurs and choir boys
Speaker 11: in comparison. And this is all going on just south
Speaker 11: of the US border. And and that's why President Trump
Speaker 11: declared these groups, these cartel groups to be foreign terrorist organizations,
Speaker 11: that they truly, truly are terrorists, and that was illustrated
Speaker 11: in these images. You know, sometimes we put graphic images
Speaker 11: on brightbart just so that people can actually see what
Speaker 11: it is that we're dealing with, and I chose not
Speaker 11: to in this particular case because the events were just
Speaker 11: so graphic. But it's shocking, and it's it's just another
Speaker 11: illustration of the mentality of these animals that Democrats are
Speaker 11: defending and supporting.
Speaker 1: Well, they do it at their own peril from what
Speaker 1: I can conclude. So keep it up, That's all I
Speaker 1: can say, because we could use a lot fewer of
Speaker 1: them in elected capacity. Toyo Texas Border associatedor Bob Price,
Speaker 1: a pleasure to have you back on the morning. She'll
Speaker 1: keep writing the great stuff, and I'll encourage my listeners
Speaker 1: to the bookmark Breitbart dot com so they can read
Speaker 1: it for themselves and also get a lot of other
Speaker 1: outstanding news that, of course the mainstream media is not
Speaker 1: willing to cover. Bob, You have a fantastic day and
Speaker 1: glad to have you in the city.
Speaker 11: Thanks good to be back there, and look forward to
Speaker 11: doing it again soon.
Speaker 1: Take care of my friends. A twenty two if if
Speaker 1: you have care site talk station, you know what I
Speaker 1: got a CT scan at Affordable Imaging Services because you know,
Speaker 1: I do what I recommend you to do, and I
Speaker 1: saved a whole lot of money. CT scan is great.
Speaker 1: It's like the third one I've gotten there. My doctor
Speaker 1: got it, no problem. The radiologists report fine, it read perfectly,
Speaker 1: there was no issues there. So I got my diagnosis,
Speaker 1: and that's what it's all about. And I also saved
Speaker 1: a heap load of money because the CT scan there
Speaker 1: doesn't cost you five thousand dollars, which you'll have to
Speaker 1: pay at a hospital. It only costs four hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty without the contrast. I needed a contrast, so six hundred.
Speaker 1: That price came with the board certified radiologists report same
Speaker 1: thing with MRIs echo cardiograms and they'll get you right in.
Speaker 1: You know, hospital's got to wait around for an echo cartogram.
Speaker 1: We're talking about your heart here. And you don't have
Speaker 1: to pay thirty five hundred dollars. You pay five hundred
Speaker 1: without an enhancement, eight hundred with an enhancement. So great
Speaker 1: way to save money, very low overhead. But the same
Speaker 1: kind of equipment hospitals.
Speaker 2: You so do what I do.
Speaker 1: Go to affordable imaging services and keep the money in
Speaker 1: your pocket. Five one three seven five three eight thousand,
Speaker 1: five one three seven, five three eight thousand Online it's
Speaker 1: affordable medimaging dot Com fifty five car the talk station
Speaker 1: for more information. One first warning weather forecast, UH, today
Speaker 1: gonna be a few clowns and it's going to clear out.
Speaker 1: The sunny sky's are in the highest seventy two. They
Speaker 1: got a few clouds over night out of fifty mostly
Speaker 1: sunny skies. Tomorrow the highest seventy eight. Another the few
Speaker 1: clouds and fifty degree overnight and Thursday at mostly cloudy
Speaker 1: day with just a slight chanceering and high at seventy
Speaker 1: nine fifty three degrees.
Speaker 13: Right now, it's time for traffic. Chuck Ingram from the
Speaker 13: UCL Tramping Center. You see Healthy find comprehensive care that's
Speaker 13: so personal it makes your best tomorrow possible. That's boundless
Speaker 13: care for better outcomes. Expect more at you see health
Speaker 13: dot com. Eastbound lateral is blocked off in seventy five
Speaker 13: Dune to an accident with injuries. Crewis are also working
Speaker 13: with the rect Northbound seventy five near Franklin right lanes
Speaker 13: are blocked with the injury accident there. Southbound seventy one
Speaker 13: continues heavy field turtle off and onto Red Bank. Chuck
Speaker 13: Ingram on fifty five K see the talk station.
Speaker 2: A twenty nine.
Speaker 1: If you do have Karo see talk station. It's Tuesday.
Speaker 1: It's that time of week. Get a deep dive with
Speaker 1: Daniel Davis doing the Daniel Davis Deep Dive. You can
Speaker 1: find his podcast just search for Daniel Davis Deep Dive.
Speaker 1: Retired Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis. I'm back to the fifty
Speaker 1: five Cassey Morning Show. I missed our conversation last week
Speaker 1: when I was on vacation. Brother.
Speaker 5: I know, man, I always go through a little bit
Speaker 5: of with draw symptoms when you take your vacation. So
Speaker 5: I'm glad you're back in the office.
Speaker 1: I'm glad to have you on the program. I really
Speaker 1: enjoy year analysis of well sadly war and you know,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry I have to. I'll phrase this as I
Speaker 1: got a kick out of it. I just like it's
Speaker 1: one of those what would Jesus do kind of things.
Speaker 1: So Easter shows up and they have a thirty or
Speaker 1: thirty hour ceasefire, I guess because it's Easter, and then
Speaker 1: start killing each other the minute it's over.
Speaker 4: With, isn't it.
Speaker 1: I mean, didn't they do that In World War One?
Speaker 1: They had like a Christmas armistice and the guys came
Speaker 1: out of the trenches from both sides. They sat down,
Speaker 1: they talked, conversed, they had cigarettes together, and then they
Speaker 1: went back to the trenches and started killing each other again.
Speaker 1: It seems kind of barbaric and preposterous, doesn't it.
Speaker 5: Well, yeah, that's that is a good analogy because that
Speaker 5: there were some similarities there, although frankly unlock the one
Speaker 5: in World War One, that this one was routinely lad
Speaker 5: left and right really throughout the whole lot of contact.
Speaker 5: So it was less of killing during the Easter holidays
Speaker 5: than it would otherwise have been.
Speaker 1: But it wasn't a full seasfire, didn't lead to anything.
Speaker 5: I guess that, you know, at least according to what
Speaker 5: Putin himself said, because he's the one who designated this,
Speaker 5: that it was just you know, for at least one holiday.
Speaker 5: He wanted his troops to get, you know, on both
Speaker 5: sides of the lines, to get some kind of respite,
Speaker 5: I guess. But yeah, like you said, it was pretty
Speaker 5: short lived, so I'm not really sure what was accomplished
Speaker 5: by it.
Speaker 1: So where are we in this whole process. I get
Speaker 1: the feeling that, you know, Trump's just kind of washing
Speaker 1: his hands of the whole thing. Russia doesn't want to
Speaker 1: sit down negotiate. Ukraine wants more than they can ever
Speaker 1: hope to get in their negotiations. And is Trump just
Speaker 1: going to turn the whole thing over to our the
Speaker 1: NATO allies in the Western European countries to handle.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this is actually a potentially very very crucial week,
Speaker 5: and one of the more crucial we've had in quite
Speaker 5: a long time, even since Trump has come into office.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 5: There are some really important meetings between the United States, Ukraine,
Speaker 5: and Europe UH in London tomorrow.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 5: And then there's gonna be some US and Russia meetings
Speaker 5: following that. And Trump put out on his true social
Speaker 5: last not that he thinks within the next three days
Speaker 5: that he thinks he can have some kind of.
Speaker 1: A deal wrapped up.
Speaker 5: I'm thinking it's more like the first version you said
Speaker 5: that the end result of all these conversations is going
Speaker 5: to be I'm washing my hands and moving on, because
Speaker 5: the sides are still so far far apart, even the
Speaker 5: US and the Western side are far apart. But then
Speaker 5: from where anybody in the West wants to go and
Speaker 5: where Russia wants to go are certainly not something you
Speaker 5: can bridge in three days. For example, one of the
Speaker 5: things that the Ukraine side wants is to say, all right,
Speaker 5: we'll we'll conceive this twenty percent of the territory where
Speaker 5: the line of contact is, but only I think they
Speaker 5: call it de facto, not.
Speaker 1: Djure, which they define as meeting.
Speaker 5: Will say yes, thank you by this, but we will
Speaker 5: not publicly acknowledge that it's your territory, et cetera. Russia said,
Speaker 5: it is our territory. It's already in our constitution, it's
Speaker 5: not even up for debate, so they would not agree
Speaker 5: to that. Then, of course you get into the bigger
Speaker 5: issues of you know, where will those lines be, because
Speaker 5: the Ukraine side wants them to be on the line
Speaker 5: of contact and the Russian side says, the minimum we'll
Speaker 5: even talk about is the administrative borders, and there's substantial
Speaker 5: portions of the southern three of those provinces that have
Speaker 5: would have to be withdrawn and evacuated by the Ukraine side.
Speaker 1: I can't see him agreeing to any of that.
Speaker 5: So if Trump is true that he wants to have
Speaker 5: this wrapped up in three days, then it's almost the.
Speaker 1: Only way he can do that is to wash his
Speaker 1: hands and walk away.
Speaker 2: So it seems I.
Speaker 1: Don't want to call it conical, but you go, do
Speaker 1: you talk to facto and d desuro of course, by
Speaker 1: law ergo the formal movement of the border to recognize
Speaker 1: this is now part of Russia as opposed to de facto,
Speaker 1: which is really what it was before, with the vast
Speaker 1: majority of the population in these regions already feeling more
Speaker 1: loyal to Russia than they did to Ukraine, so that
Speaker 1: that situation existed before Russia invaded to sort of liberate,
Speaker 1: if I may use that word, these territories, right, Well.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and then that's that really kind of gets to
Speaker 5: the heart of why I think that really the only
Speaker 5: play that Trump can can have here is to say,
Speaker 5: all right, we gave you guys every opportunity we could,
Speaker 5: but we're walking. Because even with all the combat realities
Speaker 5: you and I talk about every week we get together,
Speaker 5: that are irrevocably on the Russian side, even to this day,
Speaker 5: the Western side still cannot come to recognize that. And
Speaker 5: they think that they can actually tell the Russian side
Speaker 5: where the line's going to be, what the conditions are
Speaker 5: going to be, et cetera. When all those cards are
Speaker 5: on the Russian side and so I think that you're
Speaker 5: going to get to the point to where Trump is
Speaker 5: like faced with the reality the du jour if you
Speaker 5: or the yeah, the juror if you want to get
Speaker 5: to that one, that they're irreconcilable.
Speaker 1: And so the only option is y'all figure it out.
Speaker 1: And that means y'all fight it out.
Speaker 5: And I think that's just the harsh truth of it,
Speaker 5: because they will not come to a recognition of combat reality.
Speaker 1: Well, and we've had this conversation before. If it comes
Speaker 1: to that and we basically effectively pull the plug and say, hey,
Speaker 1: we're done. You know, you guys deal with it on
Speaker 1: your own. Our NATO allies don't have the capacity to
Speaker 1: do that. I mean they I don't think the population
Speaker 1: itself is willing to go put itself on the line
Speaker 1: to fight for Ukrainian independence from Russia to try to
Speaker 1: liberate these Russian dominated regions in Ukraine. I mean, do
Speaker 1: they have the will? That's one question. But then the
Speaker 1: second component is that we've talked about before, do they
Speaker 1: have the military hardware to do it? And I get
Speaker 1: the impression that they do not. I mean, they're starting
Speaker 1: to rebuild their armies as we speak, but they're way
Speaker 1: behind the curve on that. Yeah, I mean, let's start
Speaker 1: with the second part of that.
Speaker 5: First, the capacity, without question, there is not because Russia
Speaker 5: has spent really the first say two and a half years,
Speaker 5: two plus years, retooling their industry, building up their armed forces,
Speaker 5: building up their capacity to do all these things that
Speaker 5: they need to do, reorienting their economy so that they
Speaker 5: can sustain this. And now that they are on a
Speaker 5: steady state to where they can maintain this force, they
Speaker 5: have now about one point five million active army alone
Speaker 5: two point something total active forces when they add in
Speaker 5: the air force, in the navy, and the industry can
Speaker 5: sustain this level of fighting for indefinitely, which grossly exceeds
Speaker 5: anything the cumulative West in its entirety to include the
Speaker 5: United States can even come close to match.
Speaker 1: And they can't.
Speaker 5: And to your second point about the political will, it
Speaker 5: simply doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: Everybody.
Speaker 5: There are many people, let me put it that way,
Speaker 5: in the West ideally would like Russia to lose.
Speaker 1: It would like Ukraine to win.
Speaker 5: But if it costs them something, if they have to
Speaker 5: shed their blood, if they have, and they're boys, it's
Speaker 5: zero percent.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it makes me think of something like Vietnam
Speaker 1: a lot of resistance, so that why are we in
Speaker 1: this remote region in Asia and why are we fighting
Speaker 1: for their population? It has nothing to do with us.
Speaker 1: We're not connected with them. It just it befuddled a
Speaker 1: lot of people. And I know there were a lot
Speaker 1: of people the big supporters of it, because that was
Speaker 1: back when we were fighting the Communist you know, the
Speaker 1: Red scourge. But it's amazing we ultimately become a trading
Speaker 1: partner with Vietnam after all those years. Anyhow, the absurdity
Speaker 1: of war. Are we learning anything?
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 1: My observation on this, considering the overwhelming amount of military
Speaker 1: might that Russia has, the overwhelming numbers relative to the
Speaker 1: soldiers that are on the ground, it has taken them
Speaker 1: a long time. I think Russia thought they just roll
Speaker 1: in and to be over in no time. Have we
Speaker 1: learned something from this about Russia's ability to wage war
Speaker 1: given the size of Ukraine relative to the size of
Speaker 1: the Russian army. Is this providing us with valuable information?
Speaker 5: Let me tell you something that's not entirely good or
Speaker 5: kind or optimistic, but after World War Two we learned
Speaker 5: a great deal and our policy makers across the board
Speaker 5: in Western up recognized the reality of balance of power
Speaker 5: forces and what was and what wasn't possible, and our
Speaker 5: policies matched reality, and we got the best deal we
Speaker 5: could given the circumstances, and we kept that steady state
Speaker 5: peace for you know, during the entirety of the Cold War,
Speaker 5: and we didn't take actions that were unnecessarily provocative. We
Speaker 5: were a show to a definite strength so that it
Speaker 5: would deter the other side from doing anything, and that
Speaker 5: kept the peace for a long time. We have forgotten
Speaker 5: those lessons, and now then, despite what we have observed
Speaker 5: with well over a million people being killed and proving
Speaker 5: again the reality of the balance of power dynamics, we
Speaker 5: still have refused as a cohort in the West. We've
Speaker 5: refused to acknowledge that, and we're still pretending it's otherwise,
Speaker 5: and that very often leads to bad policy decisions that
Speaker 5: can't be accomplished and don't lead to peace. I hope
Speaker 5: it doesn't come to that, and that's one of the
Speaker 5: reasons I'm hopeful that Trump's a willingness to do that
Speaker 5: may force feed these guys to do something that gets
Speaker 5: the war off the table. And if it doesn't if
Speaker 5: they act even more foolish, if without the United States,
Speaker 5: they could plunge themselves into a war that could go
Speaker 5: nuclear all too easily.
Speaker 1: Oh jeez, Well, we don't get to end on a
Speaker 1: happy note today, Daniel Davis. But got to speak it
Speaker 1: out loud to point out what reality is I like
Speaker 1: and as we stare at this conflict, Daniel Davis, deep dive.
Speaker 1: Always a real pleasure having you in the fifty five
Speaker 1: KRC morning. Sha'll encourage my listeners to check out online.
Speaker 1: And I'm already looking forward to next Tuesday. Me too,
Speaker 1: Thanks Brian Cee. Then take care brother, it's coming up
Speaker 1: in eighty forty to fifty five car see the talk station.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: Speaking of patriots like Daniel Davis, there's a Patriot program
Speaker 1: Shop Regroup or Colorwilliams Seven Hills, and I haven't brought
Speaker 1: this up though, but they have the Patriot Home Program
Speaker 1: Terans VA Police fire and ems developed by veterans to
Speaker 1: help patriots buy and sell their homes. You get a
Speaker 1: ten percent of the SBRE group's commission given back as
Speaker 1: a rebate at closing. There is that a wonderful thing
Speaker 1: to acknowledge and respect in the patriots in our community.
Speaker 1: Just one of the many things that Shabri Group of
Speaker 1: Keller Williams seven Hills does that nobody else is doing.
Speaker 1: And they got that cash to keys program. You get
Speaker 1: to leverage Sabri Groups cash to make a cash offer
Speaker 1: as a buyer, with the Saberi Group giving a better
Speaker 1: chance to win the sale, often at a lower price
Speaker 1: and with better terms. Just a couple of little of
Speaker 1: the programs that they offer guarantee you and their commitment
Speaker 1: that you'll get a five star experience, true value in
Speaker 1: your real estate team. When you contact the Shabri Group
Speaker 1: of Keller Williams seven Hills, do it one of two ways.
Speaker 1: It's five one three seven zero eight three thousand, five
Speaker 1: one three seven zero eight three thousand. Just go to
Speaker 1: the website, drop the five to one three. It's seven
Speaker 1: zero eight three thousand dot com.
Speaker 12: This is fifty five. I've KRC and iHeartRadio station.
Speaker 1: Did you know even the smallest increases One more time
Speaker 1: with the Channel nine weather forecasts not bad. We got
Speaker 1: partly cloudy skies turning mostly sunny and highest seventy two
Speaker 1: today going down to fifty over nine with a few
Speaker 1: clouds seventy eight to high tomorrow with mostly sunny skies
Speaker 1: Tomorrow night again a few clouds in a lower fifty Thursday,
Speaker 1: mostly cloud just a slight chance of rain and Ohio
Speaker 1: seventy nine closing out of fifty four degrees. It is
Speaker 1: time for final traffic. Chuck from the U.
Speaker 13: See Up Traffic Center and you see Health. You'll find
Speaker 13: comprehensive care that's so personal and make your best tomorrow possible.
Speaker 13: That's boundless care for better outcomes. Expect more at u
Speaker 13: sehelp dot com. Cruise continue to work with the accident
Speaker 13: eastbound on the latter roll dust off of seventy five,
Speaker 13: but traffic is starting to move very slowly once again
Speaker 13: single file to get by. There's a wreckon with a
Speaker 13: ten two seventy five near the Milford Parkway, backing traffic
Speaker 13: towards east Gate at North Pound seven near Franklin Bright
Speaker 13: Wings blocked. Chuck Ingram on fifty five KR see the
Speaker 13: talk station.
Speaker 1: It's a forty eight to fifty five kr CD talk station.
Speaker 1: Happy Tuesday, Jack Atherton and judg Entnapolitan on the fifty
Speaker 1: five KRC Morning Show tomorrow. He's enjoy hearing from both
Speaker 1: of them. Every Wednesday we get to hear from both
Speaker 1: Jacket seven oh five and Judge and Polatano at eight thirty.
Speaker 1: Always like it when Congressman Thomas mass he's ahead of
Speaker 1: a Politano. But whatever, we'll get him down the road
Speaker 1: a little bit. Let us see here started out this
Speaker 1: morning telling everybody that if you have a student loan
Speaker 1: and you've at you thought you had it forgiven, or
Speaker 1: you think you're never gonna have to pay it back, sorry,
Speaker 1: Lenna McMahon's cracking down and the Trump administration of course,
Speaker 1: Education Secretary of McMahon wrote a really interesting open letter
Speaker 1: to the world pointing this out, starting with Biden never
Speaker 1: had the authority to forgive student loans across the board
Speaker 1: in the first place. Supreme Court pointed that out in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, but nonetheless he continued his efforts to
Speaker 1: suspend your obligation to pay back the sixty billion dollars
Speaker 1: every year increase of student loans. So those days are over,
Speaker 1: and she made some excellent points in her her letter.
Speaker 1: Not because we want to be unkind to student borrowers.
Speaker 1: Borrowing money and failing to pay back isn't a victimless event.
Speaker 1: Efense debt does not go away. It gets transferred to others.
Speaker 1: So if you don't pay your debt to the government,
Speaker 1: that means the rest of us have to pay taxpayers,
Speaker 1: people who had nothing to do with your choice on
Speaker 1: getting a student loan or not when you written got
Speaker 1: when you got the student loan, you well, we're obligated
Speaker 1: to pay it back. That's what the paperwork says. It
Speaker 1: always just kind of really frankly pissed me off. The
Speaker 1: Divine Administration thought, oh well, it's like buying votes and
Speaker 1: literally buying votes. Wolf, what you vote for me will
Speaker 1: forgive your student loan. Wait a second, the debt was
Speaker 1: incurred that that just it seems to me that a
Speaker 1: way of alienating every single human being who did not
Speaker 1: go into Debtford college or doesn't have a student loan,
Speaker 1: didn't go to college, the laborers out in the world,
Speaker 1: the folks that maybe chose that it was not the
Speaker 1: path for them. College is not the right path for everybody. Also,
Speaker 1: an excellent point you make, student loans must always be
Speaker 1: paid back because not like other types of loans, if
Speaker 1: you get a mortgage for a house or you get
Speaker 1: a loan for a car, you don't pay for it forclosure.
Speaker 1: There's equity in the home. The bank can foreclose on
Speaker 1: your home and sell it and get the money that
Speaker 1: you borrowed back. Your car can be repossessed. You didn't
Speaker 1: offer any collateral when you got your student loan for
Speaker 1: a college education, and it's impossible to repossess a college degree.
Speaker 1: As she wrote, it's an excellent point, which is why
Speaker 1: they're very rarely discharged in bankruptcy because someone has got
Speaker 1: to pay it back. And it's unfair to the American
Speaker 1: taxpayer that we should shoulder the burden for something that
Speaker 1: you did. And more fundamentally, as she points out, she
Speaker 1: throws a lot of blame at colleges, and I do
Speaker 1: as well, pointing out that many of the degree granting
Speaker 1: programs that qualify for student loans are worthless in the
Speaker 1: job market. Colleges nonetheless continue to accept students into these programs,
Speaker 1: encourage them to borrow money and sometimes hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of dollars to pay for them, when there's no job
Speaker 1: waiting for you on the other side, with your fill
Speaker 1: in the blank degree, humanity's degree, or art degree, or
Speaker 1: whatever it happens to be. This is what I was
Speaker 1: on a rail on this morning at the five o'clock hour.
Speaker 1: It seems to me that colleges owe an obligation, says
Speaker 1: students that are approaching them and asking to be admitted
Speaker 1: into the institution, whether or not the degree has any value.
Speaker 1: It's an ethical thing. And I know the colleges want
Speaker 1: to make money and they'll take tuition from anybody that
Speaker 1: wants to line up for any stupid degree they offer.
Speaker 1: But that they offer stupid degrees when there's no opportunity
Speaker 1: for employment afterward, that's depriving people of valuable information, information
Speaker 1: that some eighteen year old might not have or be
Speaker 1: thinking about. They're not that worldly eighteen year olds. I
Speaker 1: remember when I was eighteen, I got a political science
Speaker 1: degree from the University of Cincinnati. What kind of blank
Speaker 1: and value did that have in the real world. Well,
Speaker 1: I got I moved into political science. When I realized
Speaker 1: I wanted to go to law school, I just assumed
Speaker 1: that that was going to happen. Ultimately it did. There
Speaker 1: were employment opportunities for lawyers out in the world, and
Speaker 1: that's what I ended up doing. I don't know how
Speaker 1: it would have worked after me with a political science degree.
Speaker 1: I have no idea what I would have done. I
Speaker 1: look back on it and I scratched my head. What
Speaker 1: was the value of that? You know why I got one?
Speaker 1: I'd like politics. Well that's why people get art degrees.
Speaker 1: They like art. But you can teach that in your
Speaker 1: own time. I could have learned about Canadian parliamentary politics
Speaker 1: on my own time, read a book on it. That's
Speaker 1: pretty much all I did in college. Maybe I could
Speaker 1: have gone to the CIA. I don't know. I just
Speaker 1: know that on reflection, that's not a degree that I
Speaker 1: would look at right now and consider that it has
Speaker 1: any value. Maybe if a counselor sat down to me
Speaker 1: and talk to me about that ahead of time, or
Speaker 1: showed me what my employment possibilities might have been, I
Speaker 1: might have pursued a different degree, maybe a business degree
Speaker 1: or an accountant degree, or maybe I would have gone
Speaker 1: into chemistry. I thought about being an engineer at one point.
Speaker 1: But in the final analysis, colleges are doing many students
Speaker 1: a disservice, and as a consequence, many people leave college
Speaker 1: with a valueless piece of paper and end up in
Speaker 1: This is no diss to baristas. Somebody got to get
Speaker 1: their coffee made by somebody, But there's a lot of
Speaker 1: baristas out there with one hundred thousand dollars in student debt,
Speaker 1: but you're gonna have to pay it off. That's the
Speaker 1: latest announcement. So they're going to accommodate you. They're going
Speaker 1: to provide all the help they can get. So, if
Speaker 1: you're a student bar with a federal loan bounds haven't
Speaker 1: been making payments, you must restart the payments now, they said.
Speaker 1: The Federal Student Aid Office is providing every form of
Speaker 1: assistance they can legally they legally can to ensure that
Speaker 1: a monthly payment can fit into your budget. She writes.
Speaker 1: We recently extended the FSA call center operations with weekend
Speaker 1: hours to ensure that your individual questions can be answered.
Speaker 1: We're also updating the loan simulator to help calculate your
Speaker 1: easiest repayment plan. We also provide an advanced AI assistant
Speaker 1: to help point pinpoint your best financial strategy. So it's
Speaker 1: not they're just leaving you to their own devices. They're
Speaker 1: trying to help you accommodate the goal of repaying the
Speaker 1: debt that you incurred, so we, the American taxpayer, don't
Speaker 1: have to pay it off. I support the effort in
Speaker 1: that regard. Anyhow, Tuning again tomorrow, Jack Adan and Jenna
Speaker 1: Paul time. If you need to hear Dave Wannings from
Speaker 1: the Taxpayer Protection Alliance. You owe an obligation to everybody
Speaker 1: in the United States to contact your representative and your
Speaker 1: senator to ask them what in the hell they're doing
Speaker 1: with this Reconciliation Act. The Senates proposal only cuts four
Speaker 1: billion dollars over ten years. The Republicans only cuts one
Speaker 1: point five trillion over ten years. We blow through two
Speaker 1: trillion extra dollars. Then they take in in taxes every year.
Speaker 1: The math doesn't add up. It's a recipe for further disasters.
Speaker 1: So get in touch with them and tell them to
Speaker 1: man up, or get some wuevos, or do whatever you
Speaker 1: politically correct statement that fits your needs, but tell them.
Speaker 1: Steve Gooden breaking down the Supreme Court decisions relative to
Speaker 1: the Venezuelan prisoners, inside scoop with Texas Borders Associated or
Speaker 1: Bob Price and the Daniel Davis Deep Dive All there
Speaker 1: at the podcast page fifty five care Sea dot Com.
Speaker 1: God bless you j Just Chreker for all that you
Speaker 1: do for the morning show. Folks who hope you have
Speaker 1: a wonderful day and o't go away? Is Glenbex Next
Speaker 1: a full rundown of the biggest headlines. There's minutes away
Speaker 1: at the top of the hour. I'm giving you a
Speaker 1: fact now the Americans should know. Fifty five krs the
Speaker 1: talk station this report