Speaker 1: Get ready for it. Okay, So it's the twenty seventh
Speaker 1: day of February twenty twenty five, allegedly according to the
Speaker 1: thing we call a calendar, and all I could do
Speaker 1: this week I tried to line up a couple of
Speaker 1: guests and it became an annoying process. I gotta be
Speaker 1: honest with you. I may have an interesting guest next
Speaker 1: week for multiple shows, and I had somebody drop out
Speaker 1: on me this week. I was really trying to wrangle
Speaker 1: a special guest for the show. But deal with it.
Speaker 1: And by the way, should we bother to even analyze
Speaker 1: the news at this point in time? Right? What is
Speaker 1: actually happening? I mean, before we get to the politics
Speaker 1: and the vomit fest that it is in America at
Speaker 1: the moment, should we get into other things in the news.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It seems like most people have no
Speaker 1: use for it at this point, right, I mean, does
Speaker 1: anybody want to know about the Chinese national charge with
Speaker 1: fraud by the SEC? Just sent Donald Trump eighteen million dollars? Whoops?
Speaker 1: That was back in December. Actually, the new story on
Speaker 1: that is that a Chinese national charge with fraud by
Speaker 1: the SEC. Yeah, you know what there's a whole other
Speaker 1: story where they just canceled the investigation. Surprise, surprise, Elon
Speaker 1: Moss canceling investigations against himself too. I mean, that's fun,
Speaker 1: right Anyway, if you go over to a little known
Speaker 1: site which is a Popular Information, and you check it out,
Speaker 1: and they're one of these you know, we pretend we
Speaker 1: have a website, but we actually just have a sub stack.
Speaker 1: If you go there and check it on out, you'll
Speaker 1: find that. In December, Popular Information reported that a Chinese
Speaker 1: crypto entrepreneur, Justin Sun, purchased thirty million in crypto tokens
Speaker 1: from War World Liberty Financial WLF, a new venture backed
Speaker 1: by President Donald Trump. YadA, YadA, YadA. Should I bother
Speaker 1: to read the rest of the article? Does it actually matter?
Speaker 1: The guy is clearly profiting on a whole lot of
Speaker 1: things from the presidency, and as I said, they minted
Speaker 1: him as a billionaire before going in there this time,
Speaker 1: so this way he's actually a billionaire in the office,
Speaker 1: and we got to get into how he's acting. Let's
Speaker 1: let's update on other news stories before we go into
Speaker 1: the politics and the Trumpet spear seriously, because he's dominating
Speaker 1: everything at this point right, The former Bad Boy co
Speaker 1: founder is suing Ditty's mom, claiming he was forced to
Speaker 1: give up his share of the label. Right. Janis Small's
Speaker 1: Combs is accused of directing Ditty to assault and coercion scheme.
Speaker 1: Jannis Smalls, Comb's mother of Sean Ditty. Combs is being
Speaker 1: sued by the co founder of Bad Boy Entertainment. Kirk Burrows,
Speaker 1: alleges that he was coerced into signing over his rights
Speaker 1: to the company in nineteen ninety six. The former president
Speaker 1: of the company claims he was threatened with a baseball
Speaker 1: bat during an incident at Bad Boy Entertainment's New York office,
Speaker 1: which is the office I went to, by the way,
Speaker 1: in the nineties. Remember I told you about that they
Speaker 1: had a New York office. It was interesting, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: And this is under the Black Enterprises section. Let's look
Speaker 1: at the news Breaks site here, you know, here we go,
Speaker 1: Black Enterprises, verified publisher, absolutely for newsbreak. You know, the
Speaker 1: idea that there is gangsterism in the record industry should
Speaker 1: not shock surprise or even make anybody remotely at it.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's nothing. This is the way it's been
Speaker 1: since I don't know records were invented. Hey, let's get
Speaker 1: into JFK news tonight. They canceled their big podcast, Jeff
Speaker 1: Morley and all of them over there. They were supposed
Speaker 1: to have a mob. Did a guy over there who
Speaker 1: was allegedly a mob? So I would have loved to
Speaker 1: have questioned. But anyway, it is what it is over there.
Speaker 1: I want to study with you guys for a moment
Speaker 1: a couple of things that's happening regarding this, because, as
Speaker 1: I said before, the delivery guys are asking me, Hey,
Speaker 1: aren't you happy that the JFK files have been released. Well,
Speaker 1: let's take a look at what Larry Snapp and of
Speaker 1: course our friend mister Morley you're publishing over there. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's got a podcast related to this, you know, the
Speaker 1: JFK Facts podcast twelve Key JFK Files we should see soon, okay.
Speaker 1: And that was on their big podcast thing that they do.
Speaker 1: And you got to be a you know, subscriber over there.
Speaker 1: And I don't pay this guy. But anyway, here's something
Speaker 1: I found more interesting earlier in the week. One month later,
Speaker 1: Trump's interim grade on JFK files d plus and I
Speaker 1: got to say to mister Morley, you should know better.
Speaker 1: This is not something that can be instantaneously done. Even
Speaker 1: though most Trumpers think that you can rule by decree
Speaker 1: in America, it is impossible to make anything that exists
Speaker 1: move at the snap of your fingers. I mean, you
Speaker 1: can get law enforcement to drop a case. You can
Speaker 1: get people to not do stuff, you know, like they
Speaker 1: got them to not release all those files in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: and then Joe Biden decided to get them to not
Speaker 1: release the files and remove even a possible deeper releasing
Speaker 1: the files. They can do that pretty instantaneously, but when
Speaker 1: it comes actually getting something done doesn't happen very often. Now,
Speaker 1: Maga Maga mag is all upset because they're saying, no,
Speaker 1: we want transparency and we want these new FBI files,
Speaker 1: and you guys should just give it to us already.
Speaker 1: That's not the way this works, never has anyway. Let
Speaker 1: me read from this article, and I think it's Larry
Speaker 1: Snapp who wrote it. No, it's Jeff Morley who wrote
Speaker 1: it on February twenty second. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: if I haven't included this stuff in the live chatroom
Speaker 1: at o'celly dot com, believe me, I will. Okay, so
Speaker 1: get ready for that. Let's see what we got here.
Speaker 1: I think I've just dropped my link in there, and
Speaker 1: you guys can check it out for yourselves, and there
Speaker 1: will be links with the show notes as well, so
Speaker 1: enjoy that and you can follow this for yourself. That
Speaker 1: might have come from somebody else's email there. Sorry about that.
Speaker 1: It's a long link, is what it is. I'll try
Speaker 1: and cut them down in the in the show notes. Okay,
Speaker 1: anyway back to the fun. What is wrong with mister
Speaker 1: Morley thinking that these things are gonna happen instantaneously? See
Speaker 1: this is me defending Donald Trump? Ready it is, because
Speaker 1: come on, dude, you gotta give them time. One month later,
Speaker 1: Trump's interim grade on JFK files D plus, according to
Speaker 1: Jefferson Morley and the sub headline, thirty days after the
Speaker 1: president's pulled order, only slight progress toward full JFK disclosure.
Speaker 1: One month ago, President Trump signed Executive Order one four
Speaker 1: one seven six calling for quote full and complete end
Speaker 1: quote disclosure of JFK assassination records. Quote everything will be
Speaker 1: revealed end quote. He pledged. Let me pause there and
Speaker 1: tell you this is the typical hyperbole. Which means nothing
Speaker 1: and yet means everything to the reader. Right anyway, this
Speaker 1: welcome proclamation back to the article deserves fullest implementation. How's
Speaker 1: the president doing so far? Our question mark to assesses
Speaker 1: Trump's order and its assss to assess excuse me Trump's order.
Speaker 1: JFK Facts and researchers associated with the Mary Pveroal Foundation,
Speaker 1: host of the largest online archive of JFK assassination documents
Speaker 1: that was in parentheses, offered an objective measure of effectiveness
Speaker 1: the release of seventeen assassination related records known to be
Speaker 1: in the possession of the government agency or the Kennedy family,
Speaker 1: whose public release will enhance public understanding of the causes
Speaker 1: of JFK's assassination on November twenty second, nineteen sixty three
Speaker 1: that was bracketed out in the article. So far, the
Speaker 1: Trump administration has not released any of the seventeen documents,
Speaker 1: though some progress has been made on release of several
Speaker 1: of them. Most significantly, the FBI found twenty four hundred
Speaker 1: assassination related records comprising some fourteen thousand pages of material.
Speaker 1: These FBI documents have been added to Trump's JFK report card.
Speaker 1: Now Here's the funny part about adding it to JFK
Speaker 1: report cards for Trump. They haven't released it yet. How
Speaker 1: do you add it to the report card? This is
Speaker 1: the incomplete work number one, number two FBI files on
Speaker 1: the Kennedy assassination. As I was thinking of delving into
Speaker 1: deeply and telling you about the many different unique FBI
Speaker 1: files have been released about various cases, everything ranging from
Speaker 1: different religious cults to John Lennon even and Marilyn Monroe.
Speaker 1: I can tell you all about those things and how
Speaker 1: fascinating they are and what type of ntrary value they
Speaker 1: often have, but it's kind of meaningless. And even in
Speaker 1: the FBI files we've discovered before plenty of what rumor speculation,
Speaker 1: follow ups on reports, people saying that Oswald was involved
Speaker 1: in an orgy exactly at the moment of the assassination
Speaker 1: on November twenty second, nineteen sixty three, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. The FBI takes reports of all kinds, and
Speaker 1: quite frankly, the AI that they might be using in
Speaker 1: order to gather these documents, because that's the only way
Speaker 1: they would suddenly discover fourteen thousand pages, in my mind,
Speaker 1: is usually not effective. Enough to pick up the nuances here.
Speaker 1: Is it important? Does it happen to mention Kennedy doesn't
Speaker 1: mention tangential figures in the case, we don't know, because
Speaker 1: guess what. Still haven't seen the new ones, but I
Speaker 1: have seen the old ones, folks. Anyway, let's look at
Speaker 1: how Jeff Morley graded them. A. When the JFK records
Speaker 1: A file is fully released. Four points he's got there
Speaker 1: for Trump so far. B when the record file is
Speaker 1: designated as a JFK record prepared for release, three points
Speaker 1: C when record file is identified as assassination related, two
Speaker 1: points D when the record file is subject of any
Speaker 1: other official attention, one point F when the record file
Speaker 1: remains redacted or otherwise unavailable to the citizenry. Zero points
Speaker 1: what Trump has done. According to Jeff Morley, the new
Speaker 1: FBI Files Bureau said the newly discovered twenty four hundred
Speaker 1: assassination related records to National Archives. I want you to
Speaker 1: notice the repetitive nature of the article. By the way,
Speaker 1: Guys Morley is on the side of Trump is fighting
Speaker 1: the deep state and fighting the good fight. I am
Speaker 1: a little more skeptical and find a lot of these
Speaker 1: interesting things that he's doing as a bull in the
Speaker 1: China closet. Actually helpful because it's gonna reveal exactly how
Speaker 1: much power and how certain things really work to many
Speaker 1: an ignorant person who thinks this is all a good
Speaker 1: idea until stuff goes wrong. It's like firing the Nuclear
Speaker 1: Agency guys and then having to bring them back, or
Speaker 1: firing all the park raint. Never mind, I don't want
Speaker 1: to go into those talking points. Screw it anyway, Let's
Speaker 1: go back to the article Grade B three points significance.
Speaker 1: Voluminous cachet will shed new light on top secret CIA,
Speaker 1: dash FBI counter intelligence operations involving Lee Harvey Oswald in
Speaker 1: the summer and fall of nineteen sixty three, according to
Speaker 1: Who I Ask You. Also interesting thing here, and this
Speaker 1: is why Morley really cares about it. George Johann Edes file.
Speaker 1: Rep Ana Paulina Luna asked the CIA for a list
Speaker 1: of assassinations related records in its possession. The Joe and
Speaker 1: Edes file is held by the CIA. This is a
Speaker 1: necessary first step under Trump's order. Now, it's funny, I
Speaker 1: don't I remember seeing the George Johannedes thing denoted directly
Speaker 1: in the Executive water perhaps I missed it, guys pointed
Speaker 1: out to me, if you like, but I don't think
Speaker 1: it was there anyway. Grade be again. Significance secret operations,
Speaker 1: activities of undercover officer involved in the surveillance of Oswald
Speaker 1: and the stonewalling of Congress Arthur's Lessinger memo still redacted.
Speaker 1: You know it drives me nuts. Ciops in Mexico still redacted.
Speaker 1: Am Am World file still redacted to some degree. Yes,
Speaker 1: Miami JFK investigation still missing. Paramilitary name and photo lists
Speaker 1: still redacted. Hermino Diaz Garcia file still redacted. Okay, Bill
Speaker 1: Harvey travel records still withheld. Original Orville Next film still missing.
Speaker 1: All right, and I don't even know if that was
Speaker 1: on the official list. I'm sure that would make Gail happy,
Speaker 1: But I don't know what would make Gail happy, because
Speaker 1: now our lawyers have shut her up again, so she
Speaker 1: only talks to her guys on the Dallas action. I
Speaker 1: guess I'm a little pissed, but I'll talk to Gail
Speaker 1: about that next time I get a chance to JFK
Speaker 1: whistleblower reports still missing. Rep. Luna said the House Task
Speaker 1: Force on Secrets would hear from JFK whistleblowers and encouraging
Speaker 1: good sign Let me ask you a question, how many
Speaker 1: JFK whistleblowers that would have been in the know that
Speaker 1: were in their thirties or twenties or whatever still alive?
Speaker 1: Are you kidding me? All right, guys, let's get serious.
Speaker 1: Carlos Morricelo files still missing. Although we do know about
Speaker 1: camp text and all that, and we know about the
Speaker 1: confessions he started making when his brain was getting a
Speaker 1: little loose before somebody really shut him up with a
Speaker 1: bunch of bullets around his mouth. Anyway, Carlos Marcelo tape
Speaker 1: still missing. And yes, I know, I just mispronounced it,
Speaker 1: because you know what, Marcello is a less significant figure
Speaker 1: than most people want to make them out to be
Speaker 1: in the mob, in the Kennedy assassination, in just about
Speaker 1: everything except for about a two solid year period with
Speaker 1: the outfit. And if you don't understand that, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: you're still just buying into the legends. What can I say?
Speaker 1: Jackie and Robert Kennedy interviews still missing in a private collection.
Speaker 1: Robert Kennedy, Junior's strong advocate of full JFK disclosure, is
Speaker 1: confirmed as HHS secretary. See. But here's the thing. I'm
Speaker 1: reading Kennedy's press releases, I'm reading his tweets, I'm reading
Speaker 1: his organizational newsletter, and I don't see a damn thing
Speaker 1: mentioned about these files. Really, okay, nothing of significance. He's
Speaker 1: not involved. He is busy enough dealing with the HHS
Speaker 1: and showing up at cabinet meetings talking about what was
Speaker 1: it measles this week? Whatever is outbreaking in Texas anyway?
Speaker 1: Interim guide, we give four points for an A three. Okay,
Speaker 1: he's got all this grading system. So far, the Trump
Speaker 1: administration has earned nine points on the seventeen documents files
Speaker 1: and an average up one point eight eight points per
Speaker 1: JFK record. He's got a grading system here about something
Speaker 1: that has effectively not happened. And another thing, some of
Speaker 1: these secret tapes they're talking about were actually withheld by
Speaker 1: the family per an agreement with William Manchester, the guy
Speaker 1: who wrote you know, was it the Killing of a
Speaker 1: President or whatever? That first book, which was the definitive
Speaker 1: mainstream version of events. You can't pry that out of
Speaker 1: somebody's hands. And another one was done by Jeez, the
Speaker 1: guy with the French name that interviewed Jackie about it
Speaker 1: what Slessinger. I think it was Selessinger interviewed or about
Speaker 1: the things in general, and it is all it's being withheld,
Speaker 1: with the exception of that book where they put out
Speaker 1: an interview not too long ago on CDs or at
Speaker 1: least as far as we know, pretty much the uncut interview,
Speaker 1: and I have a copy of that. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of you do anyway. Leaving it alone, I also
Speaker 1: note that people have finally gathered together a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of Watergate break in things, and you know, for fifteen
Speaker 1: dollars online you can go and afford to buy them
Speaker 1: all and get yourself. I don't know how many thousands
Speaker 1: of pages, let me say, seventeen five hundred and four
Speaker 1: pages of FBI files on Watergate if you want to
Speaker 1: try and read them. And the funny thing is, I
Speaker 1: know I've been through a lot of this stuff, but
Speaker 1: by all means now for fifteen bucks, you can get
Speaker 1: it on a disc or a thumb drive, and I
Speaker 1: would or buy the download even but I can never
Speaker 1: afford to buy all the research materials I want, but
Speaker 1: I would advise that you do it if you go
Speaker 1: to paperless Archives Dot com matter of fact, I might
Speaker 1: actually just go ahead and copy that and put that
Speaker 1: in the chat room too. Now that's an unofficial link.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to put it with the show notes
Speaker 1: because I'm not advertising for them. They're not paying. But
Speaker 1: I'm just getting warmed up with the JFK stuff. Face shifter.
Speaker 1: I see you in the chat room, by the way,
Speaker 1: but I'm not going to be answering to the chat
Speaker 1: during the discus too much because I've got too much
Speaker 1: else to read and to listen to with you guys.
Speaker 1: Let's see. Uh, Jennifer Lopez is getting rid of Ben
Speaker 1: affleck Oh, I got all that crap from the website
Speaker 1: that tells you to take a look at somebody at
Speaker 1: ninety Yeah. Radar Online they're still going with the Michelle
Speaker 1: and Barack breaking up story, and I gotta say, I
Speaker 1: don't know how realistic it is, but their headline says
Speaker 1: exclusive divorcing Barack and Michelle Obama doing everything in quotes
Speaker 1: they can to avoid nasty public spill. Oh split, excuse
Speaker 1: me quote. They want all their assets split and problems
Speaker 1: ironed out before they come clean. According to Radar Online,
Speaker 1: I don't know how much I believe it, but then
Speaker 1: again in the unbelievable file Gene Hackman is dead. Gene Hackman.
Speaker 1: This is oh geez Nbcnews dot Com. And I go
Speaker 1: with them because they have a concise report at least,
Speaker 1: and it's sort of up to date. Gene Hackman and
Speaker 1: his wife were deceased for quite a while before bodies
Speaker 1: were discovered as death called suspicious. The Sarah said there
Speaker 1: was no obvious sign of foul play, but authorities aren't
Speaker 1: ruling anything out as the investigation continues. Now, the weird
Speaker 1: thing about this, I'll just tell you instant reports right
Speaker 1: away when it happened, is everybody in the house and
Speaker 1: the dog is dead. And the dog died in a closet.
Speaker 1: Now I can imagine I've had dogs sometimes that might
Speaker 1: be their favorite hiding spot. And it could be that
Speaker 1: the place was invaded with a gas leak or a
Speaker 1: carbon monoxide or whatever. But I think they lived in
Speaker 1: New Mexico. Let's read from the story for a moment
Speaker 1: by Patrick Smith and Minivoyne Burke. There m I nyvo
Speaker 1: nn Burke. Anyway, legendary actor Gene Hackman and his wife
Speaker 1: had been dead for a quote quite a while end
Speaker 1: quote before their bodies were found in separate rooms of
Speaker 1: their new Mexico home, authorities said, calling their deaths quote
Speaker 1: suspicious end quote. Hackman ninety three and Betty Arakawa, sixty five,
Speaker 1: were found in their Santa Fe home Wednesday, along with
Speaker 1: their dog, and investigation is underway. A search. Warren says
Speaker 1: the deaths are quote suspicious enough in nature to require
Speaker 1: a thorough search and investigation end quote. Gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: just pulling away from the article. I don't know why
Speaker 1: this is happening, but my gut is just tangling with something.
Speaker 1: Don't smell right here anyway. Preliminary findings from the medical
Speaker 1: examiners found no signs of external trauma. The Santa Fe
Speaker 1: County Sheriff's office said the cause of death has yet
Speaker 1: to be determined. Carbon Monoxide and toxicology tests were requested
Speaker 1: for both Hackman and Arakawa. Hackman's family said in a
Speaker 1: brief statement Thursday that he quote was loved and admired
Speaker 1: by millions around the world for his brilliant acting career,
Speaker 1: but to us, he was always just dad and grandpa. Quote.
Speaker 1: We will miss him sorely and are devastated by the
Speaker 1: loss end quote. They said, and let's see. Deputies were
Speaker 1: called at one forty five pm Wednesday to in address
Speaker 1: on Old Sunset Trail in Hyde Park, The sheriff spokesperson,
Speaker 1: Denise Womack Abelia said in a statement. Two maintenance workers
Speaker 1: said they found the front door of the home Ajar
Speaker 1: and the couple dead inside. According to the search warrant,
Speaker 1: it says deputies quote did not observe any signs of
Speaker 1: forced entry into the home. A man identified who identified
Speaker 1: himself excuse me as the subdivision's caretaker, called nine point
Speaker 1: one to report finding the bodies. The call audio showed
Speaker 1: he told the dispatcher he would meet first responders at
Speaker 1: the gate because he didn't have an address for the house. Quote.
Speaker 1: I am not inside the house. It's closed, it's lock,
Speaker 1: he told the dispatcher. I can't go in, but I
Speaker 1: see them. She's laying down from the window. He couldn't
Speaker 1: answer questions about whether they were breathing or able to talk,
Speaker 1: According to the audio, quote, dude, they're not moving and quote,
Speaker 1: the caller said, quote just send somebody out here really quick.
Speaker 1: End quote our Calli's body was found on the floor
Speaker 1: of a bathroom. A space heater was near her head,
Speaker 1: and a bottle of prescription pills was on the counter
Speaker 1: of the warrant set. The responding deputy believes the heater
Speaker 1: quote could have fallen in the event the female abruptly
Speaker 1: fell to the ground. Let me read that again, could
Speaker 1: have fallen in the event the female abruptly fell to
Speaker 1: the ground. That is literally how it's printed. End quote.
Speaker 1: The warrant says the pills from the bottle were quote
Speaker 1: scattered on the countertop end quote. It says a German
Speaker 1: shepherd was found about ten feet from her in a
Speaker 1: closet in the bathroom, and shepherd also dead. See, you
Speaker 1: got pills scattered around like it's a Hollywood or a
Speaker 1: TV scene, really, and a dead dog in the closet.
Speaker 1: Plus you got one guy saying the door. Remember the
Speaker 1: guys who were supposed to do some maintenance said the
Speaker 1: door was open, but they could walk in there, but
Speaker 1: they didn't. And now you got the quote caretaker saying
Speaker 1: he doesn't know the address, and hurry up and get
Speaker 1: here because I can see them, but the place is locked.
Speaker 1: See there's inconsistencies in this, So I don't know if
Speaker 1: it's their reporting or if it's the people on the
Speaker 1: ground or what's going I'm telling you something don't seem
Speaker 1: right about this. Hackman was found dead in a mud room.
Speaker 1: You know, like that's kind of like a living room
Speaker 1: for most of us, you know, people that don't have
Speaker 1: a lot of money. But anyway, Hackman was found dead
Speaker 1: in a mud room near the kitchen. According to the warrant,
Speaker 1: it says the deputy believes he may have fallen suddenly.
Speaker 1: Both bodies showed quote obvious sign of death end quote
Speaker 1: What in that hell? All right? Anyway, the warrant says
Speaker 1: Orakawa has also showed signs of quote body tea composition. Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: I'm guessing that obvious signs of death also leads us
Speaker 1: to the they've been dead a little while issue. Two
Speaker 1: other dogs were found alive on the property. One was
Speaker 1: in the bathroom with Arkawa and the other was outside
Speaker 1: the home. Okay, so three dogs, one dog dead. Now,
Speaker 1: see I didn't know about the two living dogs until
Speaker 1: just now. Sheriff Adam Mendoza said that there are no
Speaker 1: obvious signs of foul play, but then investigators aren't ruling
Speaker 1: anything out. Quote. It's not normal to find two people
Speaker 1: deceased in the residency said Thursday, quote that's concerning. And
Speaker 1: then there was also a dog that was in a
Speaker 1: kennel that was also dead found deceased, just saying. Usually, usually,
Speaker 1: you know, you got a couple living together, only one dies,
Speaker 1: the other one has to call it in, unless you
Speaker 1: get a weird situation where somebody lets him hang out
Speaker 1: for a while. But it doesn't sound like, you know,
Speaker 1: he propped them. You know, she propped him up at
Speaker 1: the table, or he propped her up. And she's thirty
Speaker 1: years younger than him and a dog guide. Almost seems
Speaker 1: like something suddenly went wrong in that apartment, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just saying, based on the circumstantial I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess it's theoretically possible that her, the dog, and
Speaker 1: him could have dropped head all at the same time.
Speaker 1: But damn, there is something weird about this anyway. I'm
Speaker 1: a skip down in the article get away from these
Speaker 1: weird twisted details allegedly produced by the sheriffs and All. Hackman,
Speaker 1: a two time Oscar winner, was known for his roles
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventy four thriller of the Conversation, nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty seven's Bonnie and Clyde in the nineteen sixty seventy
Speaker 1: one Excuse Me crime drama The French Connection, which earned
Speaker 1: him his first Academy Award. He would win his second
Speaker 1: Oscar in nineteen ninety three four Unforgiven Tell You the Truth.
Speaker 1: I remember more as what Lex Luthor in the Christopher
Speaker 1: Reefs Superman films, and also that sort of country FBI
Speaker 1: agent in Mississippi Burning. Those are the first two roles
Speaker 1: that jumped to mind. But he was in a lot
Speaker 1: of films Man a lot, a lot, a lot, and
Speaker 1: he had one of those you know, lived in older
Speaker 1: kind of faces before his time, even he was pretty
Speaker 1: old even in the nineties doing films, and in the
Speaker 1: eighties he was an older looking guy, but pulled it off.
Speaker 1: Still has seemed to have strength and even could kind
Speaker 1: of comically pull off the Lex Luthor thing, you know,
Speaker 1: super genius definitely better than the weird Jesse what was it,
Speaker 1: Jesse Isaacson They had Lex Luthor recently. That is not
Speaker 1: believable unless you want to say Lex Luthor is definitely
Speaker 1: on the spectrum anyway. Gene Hackman, God bless you man.
Speaker 1: I don't know. You entertained me, and I think something
Speaker 1: is very wrong with how they found this man dead.
Speaker 1: I don't know what. I can't point to anything really
Speaker 1: super in particular, but I gotta tell you something does
Speaker 1: not seem right anyway. Before we get any deeper, and
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm gonna give that Watergate address in
Speaker 1: the live chat room. I've got a few other things
Speaker 1: to share with you. Oh you know what, the JFK
Speaker 1: fax thing. I skipped over this, but let's just read
Speaker 1: the headline anyway. An exclusive judge anxious to see JFK
Speaker 1: documents discovered by Trump officials. Okay, this is part of
Speaker 1: the big scoop about this massive cash of FBI files. Again,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, guys, prepare for disappointment. It's like, you
Speaker 1: know what, you took the girl home that you could
Speaker 1: get toward the end of the night. She wasn't all
Speaker 1: that pretty in the first place, and then she drops
Speaker 1: her panties and a smell enters the room. You're gonna
Speaker 1: be disappointed, That's all I'm saying, fellas. And I know
Speaker 1: I don't have any female listeners, so welcome to my world. Anyway.
Speaker 1: Other things in the news, the ap which has been
Speaker 1: and from being able to guess what do anything regarding
Speaker 1: ask a question in the Trump Whitehouse and all that
Speaker 1: live updates. Trump says twenty five percent tariffs on goods
Speaker 1: from Mexico and Canada will kick in on March fourth.
Speaker 1: That's a brand new update that was issued today. According
Speaker 1: to this website. Here, they got Gene Ackman's death. There,
Speaker 1: they got the EU pushes back hard. And oh, by
Speaker 1: the way, I've got part of the White House situation
Speaker 1: regarding the meeting with the British Prime Minister who hands
Speaker 1: Trump a letter from King Charles. But you know what,
Speaker 1: I've got some audio there and I've got some other
Speaker 1: audios to play for you guys before all is said
Speaker 1: and done tonight, and hopefully i'll get this out before
Speaker 1: Friday and we'll do the live call in show. I'm
Speaker 1: really at a loss to figure out what to cover,
Speaker 1: but I finally did gather together a few things, and
Speaker 1: I really just didn't feel well enough to do the
Speaker 1: show last night, so I'm combining two different shows tonight. Anyway,
Speaker 1: gonna take a quick break because I've been at this
Speaker 1: for about thirty minutes and I think that's good enough,
Speaker 1: and we'll get into another thirty minutes of this sort
Speaker 1: of discussion and a whole hell of a lot more
Speaker 1: in the world as the Thor's Day Night O Kelly
Speaker 1: effect solo, just me reading off things and giving you
Speaker 1: my thoughts. Who knows if you expressed my caller stools
Speaker 1: there anyone else who happens to get on the air
Speaker 1: to Jelly dot com If you've not necessarily reflect views
Speaker 1: of Kelly dot com or chum and we are not responsible,
Speaker 1: we're getting stupid you, which you might ensue dot Com
Speaker 1: Radio Net. Go ahead, call it.
Speaker 2: About the JAFA assassination.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, what do you want to know?
Speaker 2: Baker's wild claim oswal girlfriends he knew Ruby and Barry
Speaker 2: hanswer weapons?
Speaker 1: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make me a wagon. But okay, was on the.
Speaker 2: Building and trying to prevent the murder of John Kennedy.
Speaker 2: Come on, now, has it real effert on the DAFA assassination.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 1: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 1: well a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith
Speaker 1: Ary Baker in her own words from the author himself,
Speaker 1: signed if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at
Speaker 1: k I A s J F K at aol dot com.
Speaker 1: It's a fun book and it actually dissects the many,
Speaker 1: many fantastic claims. Judith Very Baker in her own.
Speaker 2: Wordsmation now.
Speaker 3: Now, now, now.
Speaker 1: Do you like history, real history that you were never
Speaker 1: taught in schools?
Speaker 4: Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs in nation Building in
Speaker 4: Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with new documentation never
Speaker 4: seen before that open your eyes to events that led
Speaker 4: up to this. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Moms and
Speaker 4: nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty five through nineteen
Speaker 4: sixty one. Get your copy today at Amazon dot com.
Speaker 4: Why the Vietnam War by author Mike Swantzon dot com Radio.
Speaker 1: Quick little thing. Just in the chat room, somebody said, well,
Speaker 1: the AP was getting paid by Arabs or something or whatever,
Speaker 1: by the AI D whatever. That's not why they got booted.
Speaker 1: The official reason was because they were refusing to acknowledge
Speaker 1: the Gulf of America change on the map. That was
Speaker 1: the official statement by the White House for booting them.
Speaker 1: Now in later times people might have made claims about
Speaker 1: this AID thing, but the fact is most of the
Speaker 1: documentation on that is questionable all the way around. I
Speaker 1: don't know who got paid by AID really at this point.
Speaker 1: I just know that there's no proof for certain things.
Speaker 1: But there's all kinds of wild accusations out there about
Speaker 1: different stuff. I mean a couple of things. There was,
Speaker 1: like lesbian plays going on in foreign countries and stuff
Speaker 1: that stuff. Some of it was true weirdness like that,
Speaker 1: But the ap getting kicked from the press pool and
Speaker 1: not being able to ask questions, that was actually because
Speaker 1: they wouldn't acknowledge the Gulf of America. But hey, screw
Speaker 1: hearing from me, Why don't we hear from the President
Speaker 1: and of course the Prime Minister of England. And I say,
Speaker 1: let's take a listen to a couple of clips that
Speaker 1: I am not organized fully but was watching partially live.
Speaker 1: And I know there's some remarkable statements in here, so
Speaker 1: I want to grab a couple of them and see
Speaker 1: what you guys think. And it's not just a little
Speaker 1: sit down meeting that everybody focused on, but they also
Speaker 1: got up on some podiums talked about quite a few
Speaker 1: issues of the day. So let's hear from Trump himself
Speaker 1: about stuff that he's doing, it, has done, will do,
Speaker 1: et cetera. And also the Prime Minister of England. Let's
Speaker 1: just listen to them for ourselves. This is a let's
Speaker 1: say short, it might be two minutes long, but I
Speaker 1: don't know if I'm going to play the whole thing.
Speaker 1: So let's hang on and see what we got.
Speaker 5: It is my pleasure to bring from His majes Steve King.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay, so this is a starmer, the British Prime
Speaker 1: Minister who has personally carried a letter from King Charles
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump. So there you go. We got a
Speaker 1: little pop, little circumstance, a little presentation of the gifts
Speaker 1: and things right, and one wonders remember the you know
Speaker 1: you gotta be careful here because Kim ju jung Moon
Speaker 1: started sending letters and according to Trump's own words, we
Speaker 1: fell in love. So I hope he's not going to
Speaker 1: fall in love with King Charles. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: you never know, he could wind up having an accident
Speaker 1: in a tunnel somewhere too.
Speaker 6: Anyway, a letter he sent his best wishes and his regards,
Speaker 6: of course, but he also asked me to bear this
Speaker 6: letter and bring it to you.
Speaker 5: So can I present a letter from.
Speaker 7: A king to thank you very much? Am I supposed
Speaker 7: to read it right now?
Speaker 5: I've got to tell him what your reaction is.
Speaker 1: Almost report back to the king and let him know
Speaker 1: what you said when you read the letter. I would
Speaker 1: love to see this letter. I wonder if it's been
Speaker 1: published online anyway. Let's see what Trump reacts to with
Speaker 1: the letter.
Speaker 8: A great gentleman, A great, great gentleman.
Speaker 9: Oh that's well, well, that is really nice.
Speaker 5: I must make sure his signatures on that.
Speaker 1: Why is it gonna wind up on eBay? I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, the bald spot on the top of Trump's
Speaker 1: head really does look quite a bit like Oklahoma. I
Speaker 1: don't think he had such a pronounced bald spot in
Speaker 1: his first administration, did he. You know they say the
Speaker 1: presidency ages a guy. It's funny. I don't think Trump
Speaker 1: is aged much. The hairdo is aged a bit, but
Speaker 1: the rest of them not so much. I even think
Speaker 1: he lost weight, you know that. Yeah, I do. Don't worry.
Speaker 1: I'm not becoming a mega guy. But I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: observations are observations, and I do notice a guy who
Speaker 1: I think is gay all the time, Marco Rubio. But
Speaker 1: then again, maybe he's not. But you know, rumors in
Speaker 1: Florida persist. And I also noticed a black guy sitting there,
Speaker 1: so you know, there goes your racism. And JD. Vance,
Speaker 1: God knows what the hell he actually is. He's a
Speaker 1: weird guy telling you now. And he's a guy who
Speaker 1: even though he's gonna get confronted by a reporter later. Ah,
Speaker 1: I'll save that for later. Let's see what the rest
Speaker 1: of the reaction to the letter is from Trump himself.
Speaker 5: Not quite as meaningful.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 5: That's quite a signature, isn't it. Beautiful? And he's a
Speaker 5: beautiful man, a wonderful man, and we appreciate it.
Speaker 10: I've known him, gotten to know him very well. Actually
Speaker 10: first term and now a second term. Perhaps you'd like
Speaker 10: to say what that very important paragraph. Yeah, so this
Speaker 10: is a letter from his botch Steve A.
Speaker 2: King.
Speaker 1: Now that's weird. Trump silently stared at it, but he
Speaker 1: didn't want to read out loud what was there. He
Speaker 1: wanted to show everybody the signature. He loves showing off signatures,
Speaker 1: and he knows signatures are worth some money. So you know,
Speaker 1: got to admit, I mean that letter. Probably you could
Speaker 1: sell that thing right now for an easy ten grand
Speaker 1: to a historian, a Trump guy, maybe twenty grand, right
Speaker 1: if they got twenty grand to spend on a piece
Speaker 1: of paper. And some people will pay that much for
Speaker 1: a handwritten letter from somebody famous. And King Charles kind
Speaker 1: of a famous guy. Yeah, just saying objectively. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: Prime Minister is actually going to read part of his
Speaker 1: paragraph because Trump handed it to him to read. It's
Speaker 1: very interesting to watch the body language here too as well.
Speaker 1: I swear the guy, the Prime Minister from Britain almost
Speaker 1: looks like he's trying to prevent himself from farting on
Speaker 1: that yellow cherry sitting on. Maybe it's just me. You
Speaker 1: guys can go look at the video yourselves. The link
Speaker 1: will be in the description. It's the short one, that's
Speaker 1: only two twelve and I don't think we're going to
Speaker 1: play the whole thing. But let's get the rest of
Speaker 1: this and get the paragraph read. Boy the Prime minister
Speaker 1: who had to get the reaction to give back to
Speaker 1: the King when he returns.
Speaker 6: It's an invitation for a second stage visits.
Speaker 7: This is really special.
Speaker 5: This has never happened before.
Speaker 1: This is unprecedented and like the world has never seen before.
Speaker 1: You got to say it right, you got to move
Speaker 1: your hands like no one ever thought of, No one
Speaker 1: ever saw this before. This is unique just to me.
Speaker 1: And yes, I'm sorry the Prime Minister was speaking. Let's
Speaker 1: let's show some respect.
Speaker 6: I think that just symbolizes the strength of the relationship
Speaker 6: between us. So this is a very special letter. I
Speaker 6: think the last state visit was a tremendous success. His
Speaker 6: match to the King wants to make this even better
Speaker 6: than that. So this is this is truly historic.
Speaker 1: There you go, the truly historic second invituation to come on. Okay, anyway,
Speaker 1: let's talk about some things that are more in the
Speaker 1: news outside of the you know, uh wonderful you know,
Speaker 1: estate pomp and circumstance between HUDs of state and they've
Speaker 1: sent the Prime Minister to deliver the King's message, and
Speaker 1: I'm sure you'll hear about that on the BBC if
Speaker 1: you like. But anyway, sorry, I'm looking at them both
Speaker 1: sitting in those gotta of gold goldish yellowish colored chairs
Speaker 1: and yikes. Anyway, the accoutermam of this this room in
Speaker 1: the White House is so staged. It's just, you know,
Speaker 1: it's a stage. But that's what it's supposed to be.
Speaker 1: Right anyway, looks better than the Apprentice set. Got another
Speaker 1: video clip here which is described as Trump asks UK
Speaker 1: Prime minister if they can take on Russia by themselves
Speaker 1: in Ukraine keeping.
Speaker 5: The peace and get a top by Russia.
Speaker 1: Whill you come to.
Speaker 8: Their end if the British people are in your great
Speaker 8: and they get attacked.
Speaker 5: You know, I've always fought about the British. They don't
Speaker 5: need much help.
Speaker 1: Okay, now here's the thing. They've unfairly labeled this video.
Speaker 1: This is interesting to watch the Twist and on CNN
Speaker 1: dot com this is what they did. They say Trump
Speaker 1: asked UK Prime minister if they can take on Russia
Speaker 1: by themselves, But that's not the main thrust of the clip.
Speaker 1: From the opening he's saying. The reporter actually asked, if
Speaker 1: you pay attention to the sentence, what about if there
Speaker 1: are British soldiers in Ukraine doing the peacekeeping job and
Speaker 1: they are attacked, would US assets help the British? And
Speaker 1: this is Trump's answer to that question. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to be fair to the question that Trump is actually
Speaker 1: answering here. Maybe later he asked that question, but the
Speaker 1: first question was not that, just saying mislabeled by CNN
Speaker 1: and they put in a big black headline too. Trump asked, you, k,
Speaker 1: Prime minister, if they can take on Russia by themselves.
Speaker 1: Maybe he does say that later. Let's find out. In
Speaker 1: this minute and thirty that's left on this clip, we'll
Speaker 1: find out, probably not the whole clip, but here goes
Speaker 1: they can take.
Speaker 5: Care of themselves very well.
Speaker 10: You know what, Now it sounds like it's ce Vason,
Speaker 10: but it's study of ASO. You know, the British have
Speaker 10: been an incredible soldier's incredible military and they can take
Speaker 10: care of themselves. But if they need help, I'll always
Speaker 10: be with the British. Okay, I'll always be with them,
Speaker 10: but they don't need help.
Speaker 5: You look at their career.
Speaker 8: You have done very well over the years, Ivangick.
Speaker 1: We have, but we s your country has had a
Speaker 1: great career. You should be proud of yourselves.
Speaker 7: We all very proud.
Speaker 1: And you're going to shake my hand sideways now and
Speaker 1: now I'm going to have to make some logical sense
Speaker 1: of what you just said. They can take care of
Speaker 1: themselves well you know, any trained soldier which you would
Speaker 1: know nothing about, cadet bone spurs, uh usually can take
Speaker 1: care of themselves pretty well. Just saying, just saying, and
Speaker 1: you know what we should be careful about when we
Speaker 1: take care to dispatch them to places to do to
Speaker 1: do things, and the dynamics and the emergent situations do
Speaker 1: need to be considered, mister President, not just well, the
Speaker 1: British will be okay all by themselves. Let me just
Speaker 1: make that statement right away and keep no surprise about
Speaker 1: strategy or anything else. Or maybe you just have to
Speaker 1: guess because regardless of whatever Trump said, it doesn't mean
Speaker 1: anything when it comes to the actual real world action
Speaker 1: of the military. Now that would be actually a brilliant defense.
Speaker 1: But do you think that's what's happening or is he
Speaker 1: really speaking his mind about what he would try to
Speaker 1: order regardless of what the realistic in real time situation is.
Speaker 1: I'm asking you that question, by the way, not even
Speaker 1: trying to be hostile here and trying to be fair
Speaker 1: to this. Now the Prime Minister, after releasing his hand
Speaker 1: from this weird sideways handshake, is now doing cleanup on
Speaker 1: Trump's statement. Let's see what he said We're very proud
Speaker 1: of our country of COURSA. Yes, you are. You're proud
Speaker 1: of your career. As being written, it has been an
Speaker 1: illustrious career. Would you use career regarding the trajectory and
Speaker 1: historical record of a nation state or its military? Would
Speaker 1: you use that word career or would you call it
Speaker 1: the historical record or the past performance of the military.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's a lot of different ways to phrase this,
Speaker 1: but Trump does it his way, and now the Prime
Speaker 1: minute there is going to clean it up. I guess.
Speaker 6: Let's see, both have always been bucking each other up
Speaker 6: between our two countries. That is why this is the
Speaker 6: greatest alliance for prosperity and security I think the world's
Speaker 6: ever seen. Whenever necessary, we've absolutely backed each other up.
Speaker 1: I'm not yeah, post eighteen twelve when you burn down
Speaker 1: the White House and well, yeah, of course you backed
Speaker 1: us up ever since then, that's true. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it's been about a solid two hundred and twenty years
Speaker 1: or two hundred and fifteen years, approximately two hundred and thirteen,
Speaker 1: who's counting a year or two year there? Uh, it's
Speaker 1: been pretty solid, been pretty solid. And yeah, I think
Speaker 1: we're all on Britain side, and that's not Trump's original idea,
Speaker 1: just saying, but let's.
Speaker 5: Go, could you take on Russia by yourselves?
Speaker 1: Well, there it is. Now he does turn and just
Speaker 1: say can you take on Russia by yourselves? And he's
Speaker 1: smiling at him So is he joking? Is he serious?
Speaker 1: Is he just nervously smiling? Anybody's guess here. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't even know how to psychologically break this down
Speaker 1: because it's it's been a long time since I've been
Speaker 1: around a Trump and b Some people like Trump, but
Speaker 1: I have been around these people before, and I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, they are often difficult to read. This is
Speaker 1: me being as objective as possible, by the bye, can't
Speaker 1: do that. When I talked to Maria Heller, we did
Speaker 1: a hell in high Water this week and it's been
Speaker 1: rebroadcast on the network, but man, I cannot get her
Speaker 1: out of the Trump rut. Anyway, back to this interaction
Speaker 1: between him and the Prime Minister, and there he finally
Speaker 1: does almost a full minute in of the minute forty
Speaker 1: two of the total clip length, he finally does say
Speaker 1: can can Russia take on you? Can Great Britain take
Speaker 1: on Russia by itself. But again, the initial question was
Speaker 1: about whether they can handle it if their troops were
Speaker 1: attacked while keeping the peace in Ukraine, say in a
Speaker 1: transitional time period something like that. So we've gone well
Speaker 1: away from the nuance the question and the strategic relevance
Speaker 1: of it. So what are we listening to here? Let's
Speaker 1: see if the Prime Minister straightens it out any.
Speaker 11: The security agreement, which has been a central question hanging
Speaker 11: over all of this, Will the US come to the
Speaker 11: aid of European allies and Ukrainians.
Speaker 5: That is still very much an open question.
Speaker 1: Donald, Okay, Now this is Jepsulany, and I didn't realize
Speaker 1: that he's at the end of this clip here and
Speaker 1: now giving his analysis of what just happened. So enough
Speaker 1: out of him. I don't need to hear from the
Speaker 1: CNN talking head. We already know what they're gonna say.
Speaker 1: So I know. I got another short clip of Trump
Speaker 1: himself here. Let's see, is this another one where he's
Speaker 1: sitting down? No, that's a long clip of him sitting down.
Speaker 1: Wait a second, maybe I've already hit the long clips,
Speaker 1: and I've got a few others here. We have the
Speaker 1: entire extended sit down and we also have oh there
Speaker 1: should be yes. Okay, this is them going to the podiums,
Speaker 1: and this is live. Trump and Keir Starmer hold a
Speaker 1: press conference. So this is the presser, and I think
Speaker 1: the presser was held before. But this is weird because
Speaker 1: the Associated Press actually publishes the complete uncut press conference
Speaker 1: where none of their people are asking questions. But they
Speaker 1: were the first to publish it on YouTube, and they
Speaker 1: did so without any editing at all. I mean, I've
Speaker 1: got the guy checking the mic like fifteen minutes beforehand.
Speaker 1: They ran the whole thing if there was any movement
Speaker 1: in the room. The AP decided to run with that
Speaker 1: tape no editing. Maybe everybody's scared to edit because of
Speaker 1: the lawsuits. I don't know, but I'm looking at empty
Speaker 1: podiums now, and maybe I'll play around with the Sikh
Speaker 1: thing here and get us on to when Trump and
Speaker 1: Starmers show up. I think they announced him here in
Speaker 1: a moment. Let's see. Yeah, there we go, because I
Speaker 1: see people standing up, so let's back it up.
Speaker 7: There we go.
Speaker 1: They're standing at attention and taking out their cameras and
Speaker 1: now clapping as these two guys enter again. The Prime
Speaker 1: Minister of England, Well Britain, excuse me, and President Donald.
Speaker 7: Trump, thank you very much, great honor.
Speaker 10: Today it's my privilege to welcome the Prime Minister of
Speaker 10: a very special place, the United Kingdom, to the White House.
Speaker 10: The Prime Minister, Starmer, you've been terrific in our discussions.
Speaker 7: You're a very tough negotiator. However, I'm not sure I
Speaker 7: like that, but.
Speaker 10: That's okay, very very special person. The Prime Minister and
Speaker 10: I have gotten off to an outstanding start. The US
Speaker 10: and UK have a special relationship, very special, really like
Speaker 10: no other passed down through the centuries. And we're going
Speaker 10: to keep it that way. We're going to keep it
Speaker 10: very strong as it is very importantly. I was just
Speaker 10: notified by letter from King Charles that he's extended through
Speaker 10: the Prime Minister, a historic second state visit to the
Speaker 10: United Kingdom.
Speaker 1: Okay, clearly this was done after the presentation in the
Speaker 1: in the old Office, I guess, and you know where
Speaker 1: they were all sitting down in those ugly, ugly yellow chairs.
Speaker 1: And now you have the you know, the the Union
Speaker 1: jack and old glory behind Trump as he's speaking. But
Speaker 1: I do note, and I know people are gonna pick
Speaker 1: on me for this, but anybody else here Trump breathing heavy.
Speaker 1: He doesn't smoke, but he's breathing like a smoker who
Speaker 1: just walked up steps. Now, I wonder, you know, guy,
Speaker 1: I know they wouldn't reveal if he has health issues,
Speaker 1: and nobody wanted to make a point out of his
Speaker 1: alopecia and other medicines that he was taken last time.
Speaker 1: But the truth is that he don't sound as healthy
Speaker 1: as he did, and he looks kind of tired.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I was wondering, if this was filmed before that sit down,
Speaker 1: why his energy was so low. Instantaneously you can hear
Speaker 1: his pacing and his breathing, and while he's leaning down
Speaker 1: trying to read, he's definitely got a bit of a
Speaker 1: strain on him. I'm just saying, there is a strain here,
Speaker 1: and I don't know why. Now, I don't know what
Speaker 1: the tough negotiations were with England because or Britain, because
Speaker 1: they're not the main factor here. When it's gonna come
Speaker 1: to how they're gonna deal with you know, Ukraine, Russia.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Is there a new tariff thing that
Speaker 1: I missed here? I mean, I know they're gonna go
Speaker 1: back to and I told you about Canada and Mexico
Speaker 1: pretty soon. But I might have missed something here because
Speaker 1: I don't know what tough negotiations he was getting into,
Speaker 1: or if he just sees everything is a negotiation. But
Speaker 1: either way, you can tell when a man's getting tired
Speaker 1: and when they're breathing heavy, and when they're clearly laboring
Speaker 1: as they're speaking. And I'm telling you, I hear Trump
Speaker 1: doing that. He's not as energetic as normal. It's not sniffling.
Speaker 1: So don't write to me about how he's taken adderall again,
Speaker 1: which I never bought to begin with. I never bought
Speaker 1: the adderall or anything like that. Now, a junior Don
Speaker 1: junior maybe had some of his nose. I mean, he
Speaker 1: had clearly the red welts around the nose and a
Speaker 1: lot of different affects that made me think he was
Speaker 1: on a stimulant. But Donald Trump, I gotta say, is
Speaker 1: not known for taking any drugs.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: I don't know if a doctor prescribes a stimulant to
Speaker 1: him or gives him a be twelve shot. I have
Speaker 1: no idea, but he sounds kind of tired of your.
Speaker 10: Guys, And that's a great honor because it's never happened before.
Speaker 10: One person has never been extended that honor, and I
Speaker 10: really do call it an honor. But it's not for me,
Speaker 10: it's for our country.
Speaker 1: It's also his eyelids are extremely pink, and while he's speaking,
Speaker 1: it's kind of interesting too. Obviously, it's no comparison to
Speaker 1: the guy that we had that was, you know, clearly
Speaker 1: on another planet while he was trying to talk in
Speaker 1: front of Mike recently in the you know, in the
Speaker 1: White House, but he was being managed a certain way.
Speaker 1: And I think they all get managed in the White
Speaker 1: House no matter what their intentions are, whether they are
Speaker 1: the Gipper, or they are Donald Trump, or they are
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton, or they are it doesn't matter. I think
Speaker 1: they've all been managed at least ever since November nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty three, and probably they were advised that they should
Speaker 1: allow themselves to be managed. But anyway, let's hear from
Speaker 1: Trump directly and see if we can evaluate part of
Speaker 1: what he's saying about this situation, in this meeting with
Speaker 1: the guy from the UK. Much excuse me, the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister of Britain.
Speaker 7: Expect for our country.
Speaker 10: So I just want to thank you, and I want
Speaker 10: to thank King Charles, thank you very much and we accept.
Speaker 10: I don't know if the media is going to follow us.
Speaker 10: I have a feeling that might. Okay, thank you very much,
Speaker 10: appreciate it. I'm pleased to say that the bust of
Speaker 10: one of the Prime Minister's greatest predecessors, Winston Churchill, is.
Speaker 8: Now back in the rightful place in the Oval Office,
Speaker 8: and we're very.
Speaker 7: Proud of it.
Speaker 10: Our meeting today and the various breakout sessions we had
Speaker 10: were tremendously productive. Most importantly, I provided the Prime Minister
Speaker 10: with an update on our efforts to end the bloody
Speaker 10: and horrible war in Ukraine with Russia.
Speaker 8: Which would never have happened if I were president.
Speaker 1: That was not going to happen.
Speaker 7: I promise you that after three years of.
Speaker 10: Fallacious conflict, approximately one million Ukrainians and Russians have been
Speaker 10: senselessly killed, but.
Speaker 7: The number I believe is much higher than that.
Speaker 1: I got to put on the close captions here because
Speaker 1: I one of those words seemed a bit odd. So
Speaker 1: let's back it up just a little bit and see
Speaker 1: if I missed something, and if not, maybe it's just
Speaker 1: my ears. Let's see visit the United Kingdom.
Speaker 10: There we go go back to that, and that's a
Speaker 10: great honor because it's never happened before. One person has
Speaker 10: never been extra ended that honor, and I really do
Speaker 10: call it an honor. But it's not for me, it's
Speaker 10: for our country. It's respect for our country. So I
Speaker 10: just want to thank you, and I want to thank
Speaker 10: King Charles. Thank you very much, and we accept. I
Speaker 10: don't know if the media is going to follow us.
Speaker 10: I have a feel even in mine.
Speaker 1: I don't know if the media is going to the
Speaker 1: President of the United States is going to go to England.
Speaker 1: No media is going to follow him, right, No, Hey.
Speaker 7: Thank you very much, appreciate it.
Speaker 10: I'm pleased to say that the bust of one of
Speaker 10: the Prime Minister's greatest predecessors, Winston Churchill, is now back
Speaker 10: in the rightful place in the Oval Office, and we're
Speaker 10: very proud of it. Our meeting today and the various
Speaker 10: breakout sessions we had were tremendously productive. Most importantly, I
Speaker 10: provided the Prime Minister with an update on our efforts
Speaker 10: to end the bloody and horrible war in Ukraine with Russia.
Speaker 8: Which would never have happened and if I were president,
Speaker 8: that was not going to happen.
Speaker 7: I promise you that after three years.
Speaker 10: Of hillacious conflict, approximately one million Ukrainians and Russians have
Speaker 10: been senselessly killed.
Speaker 7: But the number I believe is much higher than that.
Speaker 1: Hellaciously, Okay, just saying you know what, Usually, as Trump's
Speaker 1: commentaries go, even though he's reading, he goes off script
Speaker 1: most times. So far, this is extremely coherent compared to
Speaker 1: what we normally get from Trump, where he bounces around
Speaker 1: and if you try and read what he's saying, I mean,
Speaker 1: and if you didn't have audio, you would think you
Speaker 1: were listening to the grantings and ravings as somebody who
Speaker 1: did not know what they were talking about at all.
Speaker 1: But verbally it seems to communicate just one of those
Speaker 1: things you always got to notice about Trump. However, in
Speaker 1: this case, I gotta say his sentences are well structured
Speaker 1: and contain some interesting words. I mean, tremendously is in there,
Speaker 1: and that's obviously is one of his words. But hallacious,
Speaker 1: I don't how many times use the word hilasious. I
Speaker 1: might have to do a little AI research on this.
Speaker 1: Let's see how often he uses certain words, you know, tremendous, terrible,
Speaker 1: all that's the senseless many of these words are constant,
Speaker 1: but halatious. I don't recall. I don't know. Maybe I'm
Speaker 1: wrong about that. Let's see what else.
Speaker 10: Yes to say, Countless schools, hospitals, towns, and beautiful ancient
Speaker 10: churches have been absolutely obliterated. To begin the process of
Speaker 10: ending this spiral of death, I christ back to back
Speaker 10: calls with President putin colorful language of successful.
Speaker 7: Calls, I might add, and Celenski and my.
Speaker 10: Team also spoke with the Secretary General of NETO and
Speaker 10: numerous occasions, and we're working very hard to get that
Speaker 10: war brought to an end. I think we've made a
Speaker 10: lot of progress, and I think it's moving along pretty rapidly.
Speaker 7: And I want to thank all of the people that
Speaker 7: are here that have been working on it. And we'll
Speaker 7: let you know what's what happens.
Speaker 8: It'll either be fairly soon or it won't be at all.
Speaker 10: In addition, this week I met with President macrona France,
Speaker 10: as you know, and hell talks with members of the
Speaker 10: G seven tomorrow. The progress toward peace will continue when
Speaker 10: President Zolensky visits the White House.
Speaker 7: He'll be here tomorrow in the early part of the
Speaker 7: day and we'll be.
Speaker 10: Signing a historic agreement that will make the United States
Speaker 10: a major partner in developing Ukraine's minerals and rare earths.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Zelensky is coming tomorrow, and the close caption guy
Speaker 1: screwed up Zelensky's name here. Trump didn't, but the close
Speaker 1: caption guy did. Anyway. Yeah, so he's coming tomorrow and
Speaker 1: I'm wondering how that's going to go and is there
Speaker 1: going to be any embarrassing stuff that they're going to
Speaker 1: try and cut from the tape there, because I got
Speaker 1: a feeling Zolensky might not be his patient with him.
Speaker 1: But if he is, that's an interesting sign considering that
Speaker 1: Trump is pretty much signaled, look, you gotta get into
Speaker 1: the Russians. It's your fault. The more started anyway, blah blah.
Speaker 1: So this is yeah, this is problematic. I'm I don't
Speaker 1: know how the guy who's supposed to be the hands
Speaker 1: on president and they tried to sell us him as
Speaker 1: a hero for a bit, and believe me, I didn't
Speaker 1: fall for that propaganda necessarily. But again, I'm kind of
Speaker 1: on the side of the smaller nation being be you know,
Speaker 1: battered by the bigger one. But I'm a bad guy
Speaker 1: for that reason, and I can't make Ukrainian supporters or
Speaker 1: detractors happy, so I give up commenting about this. But
Speaker 1: I'm letting Trump talk because this is what's gonna count
Speaker 1: after all, is him and his people and what they
Speaker 1: decide to do.
Speaker 10: Right and uh, oil and gases, and we have a
Speaker 10: great understanding. I think it's going to be great for Ukraine.
Speaker 10: We're gonna be at the site and we'll be uh,
Speaker 10: we'll be digging, will be dig dig digging dig.
Speaker 8: We must a big utility in New York conatists and
Speaker 8: they used to have.
Speaker 7: Us send dig we must and we will be digging.
Speaker 10: But much of the European aid to Ukraine has been
Speaker 10: sent in the form of loans for which they expect
Speaker 10: to be paid back, and we didn't have that honor
Speaker 10: under the Biden administration. He sent money, or just send
Speaker 10: it money after money after money, and never had any.
Speaker 7: Knowledge of ever seeing it back.
Speaker 1: Maybe he just sent money after money after money. I
Speaker 1: don't recall that kan Ed phrase, by the way. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure if that was a battlecry for con Ed guys.
Speaker 1: I remember drill, Baby, Drill, but that wasn't con Ed,
Speaker 1: And I remember con Ed guys had some sort of
Speaker 1: reliability phrase or whatever.
Speaker 5: I mean.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm wrong about that too, because Trump is older
Speaker 1: than me, so maybe he remembers something before my time. Anyway,
Speaker 1: any knowledge of ever seeing it back. Maybe money after
Speaker 1: money after money we sent. Okay, money after money, we sent.
Speaker 10: Three hundred to three hundred and fifty billion dollars. But
Speaker 10: under the Breakthrough Agreement, very unusual which everyone said was
Speaker 10: difficult to get, but it's really very good for Ukraine
Speaker 10: and very good for us. The American taxpayers will now
Speaker 10: effectively be reimbursed for the money and hundreds of billions
Speaker 10: of dollars port into helping Ukraine defend itself, which buy
Speaker 10: and of itself, is.
Speaker 7: A very worthy thing to do.
Speaker 10: We've paid far more than any other country, and with
Speaker 10: most of our support, it's been paid in military, the
Speaker 10: finest weapons anywhere in the world. This includes vast amounts
Speaker 10: of military hardware, ammunition, and various other things that we
Speaker 10: now have to start rebuilding our own stockpiles. Additionally, the
Speaker 10: Minerals Agreement will provide the basis for a more sustainable
Speaker 10: future relationship between the United States and Ukraine.
Speaker 1: He's getting steam as this is going. He started out
Speaker 1: slower and like breathing hard. And he's now actually picking
Speaker 1: up in his stamina here, isn't he thinks getting excited
Speaker 1: about the idea that we're going to get all these minerals.
Speaker 1: And man, I mean there's a lot going on in
Speaker 1: a place that is only the size of Texas a lot,
Speaker 1: because I mean what people have described there. I mean
Speaker 1: half the planet couldn't fit most of what's there in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: So I'm anxious to see what dividends pay off and
Speaker 1: quite honestly, to set up mining operations, have it actually
Speaker 1: return and affect the economy. I mean, Trump should be
Speaker 1: out of office by then, unless he gets a third term, right,
Speaker 1: which they are discussing every once in a while here
Speaker 1: and there, and nobody's reporting on it, but there are
Speaker 1: people seriously considering can we change the constitution, Can we
Speaker 1: change the rules of the office to give Trump a
Speaker 1: third term? I don't know, man, he's not gonna live forever,
Speaker 1: just saying and please God help us, don't put one
Speaker 1: of his children in charge.
Speaker 10: Anyway, and the stimulate the long term prosperity that will
Speaker 10: help the ukraine ins rebuild their country.
Speaker 7: It's been demolished and the rule.
Speaker 1: Now there he seems to have gone off script, and
Speaker 1: you can see him looking away and trying to catch
Speaker 1: his place there, and now the eyelids are fluttering again.
Speaker 1: You see he got a quick burst of energy there.
Speaker 1: He's erratic. But again, I mean, how can you complain
Speaker 1: considering we had the you know, is in beat healthcare?
Speaker 1: That was what his predecessor sounded like. And hell of
Speaker 1: a twist from him being the predecessor to that guy
Speaker 1: and their predecessor who was actually eloquent even though he
Speaker 1: was selling you a whole lot of abandon all hope
Speaker 1: and beg for change, you know, Barry Obey or Barry Obama. Anyway,
Speaker 1: back to what Trump is actually saying about rebuilding the
Speaker 1: country and how this is going to be beneficial for all.
Speaker 1: But you know, this is always the weird thing. There's
Speaker 1: always a loser in these equations. Who is going to
Speaker 1: end up holding the losing back where they lose money,
Speaker 1: they lose resources, and they lose out on their national identity,
Speaker 1: sovereignty as a people, et cetera. Anybody got an answer
Speaker 1: for that? Most people nowadays think the US loses on
Speaker 1: everything because everybody's taking advantage of us. Because there's been
Speaker 1: a lot of suckers who didn't know what they were doing,
Speaker 1: or people that just wanted to give away the country.
Speaker 1: And I can't argue with them. I only argue with
Speaker 1: their singular focus. But I think there's a whole lot
Speaker 1: of people that have done that to us for a
Speaker 1: long time for their own personal gain. By the way,
Speaker 1: but pay no attention to personal gains for people in offices,
Speaker 1: because must be a good reason why a billionaire's got
Speaker 1: to show up and get a hold of exactly, you know,
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars that he thinks he can re rein
Speaker 1: in and all that, even though he didn't do that.
Speaker 1: But we're not talking about Elon Musk tonight, or are
Speaker 1: we anyway?
Speaker 8: On infrastructure, the infrastructure, as you know, is in very
Speaker 8: bad shape.
Speaker 10: In just over one month, our administration has already achieved
Speaker 10: more progress toward peace than years in the other administration,
Speaker 10: where they did nothing toward peace.
Speaker 7: They didn't understand what was happening.
Speaker 10: Our approach is basically common sense. As I said, so
Speaker 10: many of the things that we do based on common sense.
Speaker 10: If you want peace, you have to talk both sides.
Speaker 10: As I discussed with Prime Minister Starmer. The next step
Speaker 10: we're making is toward a very achievable ceasefire. We hope
Speaker 10: that that can happen, happened quickly, because thousands of young
Speaker 10: people in this case, we're not talking about Americans, we're
Speaker 10: talking about Ukrainians and Russians are being killed every week, thousands,
Speaker 10: and it's a rough battlefield. It's a flat piece of land,
Speaker 10: and the bullet only stops when it hits somebody.
Speaker 1: Weird characterizations here from a guy who has no idea
Speaker 1: what he's talking about here, I mean, in a real
Speaker 1: world sense, he does not know what he's talking about.
Speaker 1: And the funny thing is, again, I just I don't know, man,
Speaker 1: I just you've made great strides in peace, but you
Speaker 1: don't have a ceaspire in hand yet. And not saying
Speaker 1: that Biden did a damn thing here to achieve peace, No,
Speaker 1: not at all, not defending any of that crap. But
Speaker 1: see again, we have achievements the heart, the horse before
Speaker 1: the cart, the cart before the horse, maybe even not
Speaker 1: making sure that there's flat ground for the horse and
Speaker 1: the cart to run on yet and declaring the roads open.
Speaker 1: This is what keeps happening with this Trump administration. The wishful.
Speaker 1: Ones that want to be supportive are unrealistic. The people
Speaker 1: that want to attack them are completely I mean unrealistic.
Speaker 1: I mean the Trump supporters are talking in cartoons. The
Speaker 1: other people are talking and stuff that I can't get
Speaker 1: high enough to imagine. Weird things they're trying to introduce,
Speaker 1: like this, this happened, This happened, This happened. Okay, I
Speaker 1: got a few good points. Now I'm gonna tell you
Speaker 1: about my bizarre world where I think everybody sees this
Speaker 1: and they're turning against Trump and they're gonna protest him,
Speaker 1: and where lunatic. Nobody's turning against this guy, not even
Speaker 1: the people that want to allegedly his alleged opposition is
Speaker 1: even quiet. For God's sake, nobody's opposing him. He's got
Speaker 1: full rain. And I gotta tell you, if things go
Speaker 1: wrong here and stuff doesn't turn out the way that
Speaker 1: you thought it would, you got nobody to blame, because
Speaker 1: nobody is legitimately resisting this guy or his administration, any
Speaker 1: of them. So they've got the full reins. And what
Speaker 1: we gotta do is figure out if this stuff works,
Speaker 1: because you know what, if this brand new way oversimplification
Speaker 1: and just going after things. Hey, whole hog with a sledgehammer.
Speaker 1: If that's the way stuff works, great, I will be
Speaker 1: happy and tell you that President Trump taught us something
Speaker 1: in America that we can take forward into the next
Speaker 1: few generations and learn from, and that is, you don't
Speaker 1: need a scalpel to do the surgery that government tries
Speaker 1: to do. Do it with a sledgehammer. It works. It
Speaker 1: might be a little messy, it might be a little painful,
Speaker 1: but it gets the job done. If indeed that's the
Speaker 1: results we get. But so far, people are celebrating results
Speaker 1: that haven't happened. They're decrying disasters that have not even
Speaker 1: begun to unfold either way, They've gone insane about the
Speaker 1: way they're describing this instead of actually listening and watching,
Speaker 1: which is what I'm trying to do. I know I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get hate mail anyways, screw it. A couple more
Speaker 1: words from Trump and then maybe I'll get into some
Speaker 1: other things, and then I'm just gonna get done with this,
Speaker 1: because I'm telling you now, I am sick to death
Speaker 1: of even trying to discuss this with anybody, because all
Speaker 1: they're interested in is their own opinions as opposed to
Speaker 1: observing what's actually happening, and I gotta tell you something here.
Speaker 1: And here's the secret message for tonight. There is a
Speaker 1: giant secret message which I'm gonna get to in the
Speaker 1: very last part of this show. I'm gonna give it
Speaker 1: to you and I'm gonna be done with it. And
Speaker 1: I want you guys to please listen to the last
Speaker 1: part of this show because it's extremely important and it's
Speaker 1: something where I want you guys to participate. Here give
Speaker 1: me new direction. You know, Jimmy James, who I often
Speaker 1: disagree with politically, has given me brilliant ideas for radio shows.
Speaker 1: And I don't get brilliant ideas from a lot of
Speaker 1: other people. I get a lot of screw you. I'm
Speaker 1: going away, I'm withdrawing my support. I will no longer
Speaker 1: be there, and the numbers show it. I have a
Speaker 1: lower audience than I have had in years. I know
Speaker 1: it good, fine, But here's the thing. At all times,
Speaker 1: not just on the open mic Friday night, I have
Speaker 1: tried to say to you guys, Okay, tell me what
Speaker 1: it is you want to learn about. I will bring
Speaker 1: you a unique presentation. Then I guarantee if you hear
Speaker 1: me out and if you take a look at, you know,
Speaker 1: the research I did, you will learn something, I promise you,
Speaker 1: And nobody wants to take me up on that anymore.
Speaker 1: This is why alternative media has died. It's not just
Speaker 1: that they're idiots that can't do anything but agree with
Speaker 1: each other and stare into their own navels, and also
Speaker 1: sit there and act like they haven't achieved victory even
Speaker 1: though they've gotten everything they wanted. Now, according to what
Speaker 1: they were saying a year, two three ago, they should
Speaker 1: be happy, thrilled. They're not. They're sitting there, not disagreeing
Speaker 1: with each other or anything, and they're with the establishment
Speaker 1: and they think they're somehow outside of it, when all
Speaker 1: they are is the bad version of something you can
Speaker 1: already get elsewhere. And in that case, I would tell
Speaker 1: you go to the corporate media outlet, because at least
Speaker 1: they'll have flashy pictures and good graphics instead of the
Speaker 1: Brady Bunch split you know, Google, hangout crap. That's right,
Speaker 1: I agree with you, that's right, I agree with you.
Speaker 1: Hel come other people don't understand that we're right about stuff.
Speaker 1: And that goes on for four hours or thirty five seconds,
Speaker 1: depending on you know, the actual demographic of the podcast.
Speaker 1: But here's what I want from you, guys. Tell me
Speaker 1: the stuff that you're not hearing covered elsewhere, Seriously, things
Speaker 1: that are not being covered elsewhere. I want to offer
Speaker 1: something that is not already on the corporate menu, that
Speaker 1: is not out there already in the blogger sphere of nonsense,
Speaker 1: that's not already a YouTube channel. Give me what it
Speaker 1: is you want to hear. I'll turn my focus to it.
Speaker 1: If it's remotely something that I can utilize and get
Speaker 1: into it with my own expertise, I'll do so. And
Speaker 1: if not, I will seek out guests who can educate
Speaker 1: not only you but me on the subject. Nobody wants
Speaker 1: to talk about food anymore. Nobody wants to talk about
Speaker 1: actual history anymore. Nobody wants to I mean, you guys
Speaker 1: want to hear a little bit about Some people want
Speaker 1: to hear from me about JFK a little bit, But
Speaker 1: they don't want my opinions on it. They just want
Speaker 1: to hear about a few other people's opinions. Maybe on
Speaker 1: the JFK case. That's it. Screw you otherwise, And how
Speaker 1: dare you not bring on my favorite idiot who's out
Speaker 1: there pushing their favorite fan fiction. No, I won't do it.
Speaker 1: I won't give you garbage no matter what it is.
Speaker 1: Even if I disagree with the thing, it might be
Speaker 1: an interesting expose and exposition to show you. I might,
Speaker 1: you know, look, I might do a whole show. And
Speaker 1: I have done a whole show on Jim Jones and
Speaker 1: his cult, and I clearly call it a cult, think
Speaker 1: it was dangerous. But yet I was willing to explore
Speaker 1: it and show you what happened there and talk to
Speaker 1: people who to this day are still sympathetic even though
Speaker 1: they knew. Hundreds of people that perished in the slaughter
Speaker 1: that was Jonestown in nineteen seventy eight were haunted by
Speaker 1: the rest of their lives. Laura Johnston Cole was on
Speaker 1: this show various times. I tried to get other witnesses
Speaker 1: on the show, one minor misstep off Mike with them
Speaker 1: trying to interview them to get them on, because they
Speaker 1: had to speak to me first to feel me out,
Speaker 1: And Nope, I'm not going on with you because you
Speaker 1: are categorizing us as a bunch of nuts and I
Speaker 1: wasn't even doing that trying to be fair. I mean, hell,
Speaker 1: I had Shane Stevens on here. I don't agree with
Speaker 1: LBJ did it. He thinks LBJ did it and his
Speaker 1: grandfather wasn't such a bad guy. Meanwhile, I've said many
Speaker 1: times Billy Celestie's was a con artist. He was clearly
Speaker 1: somebody who you can't necessarily trust his word because he
Speaker 1: might have been lying, but also he might have had
Speaker 1: strategic reasons for saying things YadA, YadA, YadA. And also,
Speaker 1: I'm not a mob did a guy, not because I
Speaker 1: just want to defend Italians, but because there's not enough
Speaker 1: evidence for it. But please, you got a good mob
Speaker 1: did it story? Come on, let's tell it now. I
Speaker 1: don't go for the whole Jewish conspiracy when it comes
Speaker 1: to JFK, and I've been resistant to that, but hell,
Speaker 1: make a good case that you can show me some new,
Speaker 1: new and compelling history, and I'll do it just for
Speaker 1: the sake of that, because the Billy Celestie's tape that
Speaker 1: was to show you a piece of history that is
Speaker 1: real on some level, that does involve two significant categories.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the reason why I bring up
Speaker 1: this whole you know thing at the beginning about the
Speaker 1: Chinese guy who's selling out to Trump or buying Trump's
Speaker 1: influence and whatnot. Is because these things, all these gray areas,
Speaker 1: all the citizens united, all of the you know, the
Speaker 1: sea pack strength and the DNC and the RNC and
Speaker 1: all that stuff was all just foundationally bare bones. When
Speaker 1: Lyndon Johnson got a hold of it, his whole bag
Speaker 1: man set up and success at raking in money and
Speaker 1: things and turning over stuff from the Agriculture Department, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Lyndon Baines Johnson, I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, civil rights hero who hated black people and
Speaker 1: was so humane that he picked up dogs by their
Speaker 1: ears anyway, piece of garbage, human filth that should never
Speaker 1: be celebrated. And yet Lyndon Johnson, he was the great
Speaker 1: civil rights hero, trying to establish a legacy with the
Speaker 1: most vulnerable people he could find. He gave electricity to
Speaker 1: black people. He was not a fan of black people.
Speaker 1: I brought that up with Shane Stevens on this show,
Speaker 1: and Shane kind of went, yeah, that's true, because there
Speaker 1: was a corruption and an evil there. Now do I
Speaker 1: support the evil? Not at all, matter of fact, I'll
Speaker 1: point it out, but exposition. I want to explore things
Speaker 1: that you are not getting elsewhere, show you something new.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's somebody else's expertise, maybe it's my observations where
Speaker 1: I pick up on stuff that nobody else mentions, Like,
Speaker 1: for instance, I'll give you the best one as of late,
Speaker 1: which is that people say, oh, well, you're either for
Speaker 1: Trump or you're against Trump with Ukraine this and that
Speaker 1: and da da dah. And I was always saying, what
Speaker 1: about the people on the ground that are going to
Speaker 1: pay for this one way or another? And then people say, oh,
Speaker 1: you still holding onto your you know, Soviet prejudice against
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin and b B.
Speaker 5: Actually not.
Speaker 1: I see Putin as a guy who is smart enough
Speaker 1: to understand that there is a fine line between being
Speaker 1: the criminal, organized criminal and just a regular old businessman.
Speaker 1: And some of those lines of differentiation are drawn over
Speaker 1: who's successful, not over who's got the moral high ground,
Speaker 1: not over you know, none of that, none of that
Speaker 1: at all. Nobody asks the proper questions here, right, Nobody says,
Speaker 1: wait a minut, what happened here? When it comes to
Speaker 1: this whole Palestine and Israel issue, the people that didn't
Speaker 1: want us to be intervening elsewhere, think we should intervene there.
Speaker 1: Not only that, they're all for Trump treating it like
Speaker 1: it's just a real estate deal. It's a development contract.
Speaker 1: And we got a few rough things on the ground.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if somebody digs I guarantee they
Speaker 1: can find local New York broadcasts about Trump talking about
Speaker 1: real estate developments in bad neighborhoods because Atlantic City not
Speaker 1: a good, safe neighborhood, and other places where Trump was
Speaker 1: allegedly building things even though it looked like he was
Speaker 1: building things and he wasn't. Sometimes although he did have to,
Speaker 1: you know, actually hire Polish immigrated workers in order to
Speaker 1: get them in on visas and pay them pennies on
Speaker 1: the dollar for which he ripped off. But anyway, pay
Speaker 1: no attention to any of that, because most of that
Speaker 1: is normal in the business world. Absolutely positively, as I
Speaker 1: used to like to say. But the truth is, nobody
Speaker 1: will ask the appropriate question, what is the motivation and
Speaker 1: does this make sense? And the people that would have
Speaker 1: said before, we don't need to be involved in stuff,
Speaker 1: We don't need to get involved in these squabbles that
Speaker 1: should be regional, etc. Etc. They want us involved there.
Speaker 1: They don't want us involved in Ukraine. Give them the
Speaker 1: right circumstance and they're willing to throw soldiers in at
Speaker 1: a whim. And resources and money is the sky's the
Speaker 1: limit if you got the right cause. But if you don't,
Speaker 1: they'll shut you down. And that's the problem I have
Speaker 1: with that side of the equation. The other side of
Speaker 1: the equation, my biggest problem is they're not liberals. They
Speaker 1: couldn't be liberals. They don't think in a liberal way.
Speaker 1: They are totalitarians, and they have mental disorders, all of
Speaker 1: them because none of what they ask for, none of
Speaker 1: what they declare their values make any sense with any
Speaker 1: of the crap they do. And the only commonality between
Speaker 1: both parties in my mind, is that they go into
Speaker 1: the upper echelons of power and turn themselves from common
Speaker 1: middle class you know, whitebred, neighborhood living type people, into
Speaker 1: very wealthy individuals. They actually acquire generational wealth by being
Speaker 1: a public servant. Oxymoron anyone, We serve it right next
Speaker 1: to the ironically placed jokes that are simply not funny,
Speaker 1: but stick around, we might have a few jokes that
Speaker 1: are funny. As I get ready to close this one
Speaker 1: out on the Thursday Night O'Kelly effect, which has gone
Speaker 1: way longer than it should. And I'm asking you, guys,
Speaker 1: please please please start sending me the suggestions the guest hooks, hookups,
Speaker 1: volunteers even to come on this show and reveal to
Speaker 1: the audience stuff they are not getting elsewhere. I don't
Speaker 1: want to parrot anybody. I'm not Joe Rogan. I don't
Speaker 1: have money backing me up no matter what I do.
Speaker 1: I'm not Alex Jones who continues to survive, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, real quick before I was gonna go to break.
Speaker 1: But I'm holding myself up on a break here. Why
Speaker 1: because I want to go and take a look at something. Okay,
Speaker 1: you go and look at what is trending on Twitter
Speaker 1: in their broadcast sphere, because they are now a broadcaster constant.
Speaker 1: Take a look at what dominates. And this is not
Speaker 1: atypical for any given day. I took this snapshot. Let's
Speaker 1: see what time of day did I take this snapshot
Speaker 1: two twenty seven at twelve fourteen? Okay, at twelve fourteen.
Speaker 1: I took this around noontime today, just to get a
Speaker 1: mid day's view at the beginning of the solar day
Speaker 1: at twelve noon, okay, and what do I got? Every
Speaker 1: single day on Twitter, the top two things are dominated
Speaker 1: by Alex Jones. What is he saying today? Epstein files
Speaker 1: to be released today? Watch Live with Alex the very
Speaker 1: next thing down, because now he's not just the Alex Jones,
Speaker 1: but he's the Alex Jones network, which was formerly Infohorse,
Speaker 1: which is still Infohorse info war. Excuse me, I misspoke
Speaker 1: breaking Epstein files to be released today? Watch dot du
Speaker 1: dot so double messaging at the top, double barreled every day,
Speaker 1: Alex Jones twenty four hours a day. The next person down, interestingly,
Speaker 1: is a guy who continues to survive and thrive despite
Speaker 1: the fact that he can still act like a rich
Speaker 1: man and now he's just allegedly a podcaster. Russell brand
Speaker 1: the battle for power, Trump's plan, Elon's Purge and the
Speaker 1: DEI dot dot dot Russell brand as your controlled, idiotic
Speaker 1: opposition who wants to appear enlightened. Then Reuters finally gets
Speaker 1: to some actual news. Reuters kier kate e I R
Speaker 1: and I didn't listen to how they pronounce his name,
Speaker 1: so I don't care. Starmer. You know that is the
Speaker 1: British prime minister. We've been talking about arrives to meet
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in Washington, and you can listen to that
Speaker 1: live at noontime. And underneath that another piece of controlled opposition.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, I am in contact with
Speaker 1: a Trump family member and I'm trying to convince them
Speaker 1: to come on the show because they've got a point
Speaker 1: of view. You're not hearing from any other Trump family member.
Speaker 1: And it's not the woman I'm talking about here, which
Speaker 1: is Mary L. Trump Live Mary Trump's nerd Avengers at
Speaker 1: twelve pm Eastern Time. So she's in the top five
Speaker 1: on Twitter. Why because the algorithm says that I'm interested
Speaker 1: in news, current events, and politics. Therefore, this is what
Speaker 1: I want to hear. Alex Jones is getting rammed down
Speaker 1: the throats of people on the Twitter platform who thinks
Speaker 1: this is really interesting? And they only invented podcasts a
Speaker 1: couple of years ago, and Joe Rogan has been the
Speaker 1: king ever since they created him. And I could be
Speaker 1: the king of podcasting, but a two hundred million dollar salary,
Speaker 1: I promise you that. Plus I would travel around the
Speaker 1: country and really show people things brand new all the
Speaker 1: time because I would get exposed to the various pockets
Speaker 1: of unique subcultures all over this country that used to exist.
Speaker 1: I gotta be honest with you. I only have gone
Speaker 1: to Dallas, Texas in the past few years. I haven't
Speaker 1: even been back to my home state of New Jersey,
Speaker 1: so I don't know if all of those subcultures still exist.
Speaker 1: I'm not certain, but if they do, I would go
Speaker 1: around and show them to you and show you what
Speaker 1: it's like for me to interact with them, interview people
Speaker 1: common and otherwise all over the country if I had
Speaker 1: the funds to do it. But I don't. I only
Speaker 1: go where i'm funded, and I'm not funded by much.
Speaker 1: And I'm not asking you for money at this point.
Speaker 1: I am asking you guys because money I know I'm
Speaker 1: not going to get it. But I'll tell you this,
Speaker 1: I would love to get ideas. What it is you
Speaker 1: want to learn about, what it is you're not hearing about,
Speaker 1: what it is you think is missing from everybody substack,
Speaker 1: the corporate media, the alleged hacks, and the alt media,
Speaker 1: all of it. Come to me and say, dude, nobody's
Speaker 1: covering this. Write to me infhotochelly dot com. Message me
Speaker 1: O'Kelly effect on the Twitter x platform. And yes, I
Speaker 1: saw the video of Donald Trump licking and kissing Elon
Speaker 1: Musk's feet. That was an AI generated video, just like
Speaker 1: the Rocky seven trailer. Maybe I'll try and dig that
Speaker 1: one up before the show's over and put it in
Speaker 1: the show notes for you. Maybe I will, Maybe I won't.
Speaker 1: Click on the.
Speaker 12: In Denial Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks by
Speaker 12: Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US covert
Speaker 12: operations and are still happening today. Larry Hancock's book In
Speaker 12: Denial rips the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 13: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs and no
Speaker 13: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 13: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 13: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 13: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 13: that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 13: In Denial, Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks Larry Hancock.
Speaker 13: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com.
Speaker 13: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot
Speaker 13: com in digital or physical.
Speaker 14: Fat Chilly Yo yell Is Doug Campbell host of the
Speaker 14: Dallas Action podcast presented by Wall Street Window, and you
Speaker 14: are listening to the o'chill effect revelation through conversation.
Speaker 15: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 15: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy president in
Speaker 15: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 15: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 15: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 15: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 15: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 15: Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 15: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 15: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 15: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 15: island arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 15: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 15: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 15: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 15: reveals why and will show you what President.
Speaker 1: Kennedy was up against. For more information, the Warstate.
Speaker 12: Dot Com revelation through conversation.
Speaker 1: Hey, what happens when you actually play a bit of
Speaker 1: a sound that is simultaneousously coherent and crazy? And I
Speaker 1: always love that uh one line in the uh in
Speaker 1: one of the movies from a long time ago, And
Speaker 1: I can't remember which movie it is off top of
Speaker 1: my head. Isn't that scary? But I always remember this part.
Speaker 1: I might not know karate, but I know karaze.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 11: They passed the budget resolution that would gut Medicaid and
Speaker 11: food stamps to cover over a trillion in tax cuts
Speaker 11: for the one percent, and conservatives online are celebrating it,
Speaker 11: which is weird to me because I know they can't
Speaker 11: all be part of the one percent on account of
Speaker 11: how percentages work and everything.
Speaker 5: So I don't understand what y'all are cheering.
Speaker 1: And they say, I don't know.
Speaker 11: Trump already said he's gonna help working people because there's
Speaker 11: gonna be no taxes on tips and overtime and stuff.
Speaker 11: All right, But those things are like the governmental equivalent
Speaker 11: of working for a soulless corporation that will write you
Speaker 11: up for attending the birth of your child. But you know,
Speaker 11: sometimes on Fridays they let us untock our shirts and
Speaker 11: eat cold pizza. Comparatively, those measures ain't shit, all right,
Speaker 11: but much much more importantly, also.
Speaker 5: They ain't even doing them.
Speaker 11: Those sayings they fart of this resolution.
Speaker 5: So I ask again, what are you happy about?
Speaker 11: And they might say, well, you know, either way, they're
Speaker 11: balancing the budget, they're triming government spending, and it's good
Speaker 11: for all of us. Look not to get too professorial
Speaker 11: on you, but n uh, is it going to increase
Speaker 11: this country's debt? How are you okay with that? As
Speaker 11: a conservative? One Republican and Congress voted no on this
Speaker 11: because he said it's going to increase our debt and
Speaker 11: I just don't think that would be, you know, fiscally responsible.
Speaker 1: Well, hey, but we're getting plenty of eggs from Turkey
Speaker 1: and and I don't mean Turkey the bird. I do
Speaker 1: mean Turkey the country, and we're making all kinds of deals.
Speaker 1: And Trump again repeated that we're not paying tariffs if
Speaker 1: we're the consumers. Ever, because other countries pay the tariffs,
Speaker 1: well do they? Anyway? Let's hear a little more from
Speaker 1: that meeting with the Prime minister, indirectly from Trump instead
Speaker 1: of from the commentary there which was the liberal redneck.
Speaker 1: Let's hear from Trump himself, and I'll try and just
Speaker 1: shut up and go on with it if unless something
Speaker 1: coraze happens during it.
Speaker 5: And we have some very talented people on the other side.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, this is a completely randomly
Speaker 1: pulled clip and I am not attempting to judge it
Speaker 1: in any way. And listening to this part of the
Speaker 1: interesting press event for the first time along with you.
Speaker 1: I didn't hear this part live anyway. Here we go
Speaker 1: from earlier today President Trump with President with excuse me,
Speaker 1: British PM Starmer.
Speaker 10: We have some people that probably aren't as talented as them,
Speaker 10: but they're pretty good.
Speaker 5: Marco what our people are pretty good?
Speaker 1: And what do you think, little Marshall?
Speaker 5: And we'll be talking about you think, mister Starmer.
Speaker 16: The Prime Minister has said that he believes that Vladimir
Speaker 16: Putin would be at risk of invading in Ukraine again
Speaker 16: without a sufficient backstore. Do you think that Vladimir Putin
Speaker 16: would be likely to invade again in the.
Speaker 5: Event of I don't think so. I think when we
Speaker 5: have a deal, it's going to be the deal. I
Speaker 5: don't think if if I didn't win the election.
Speaker 10: I don't think would be even talking to Pootin right
Speaker 10: now or anybody else.
Speaker 7: I think.
Speaker 1: Okay, just really quickly, I want to tell you that
Speaker 1: the noise, the excessive room noise, is due to the
Speaker 1: fact that this is a Fox News feed and for
Speaker 1: some reason, Fox cranks up the audio on their feeds,
Speaker 1: not necessarily the volume, but cranks up the gain on
Speaker 1: their audio, so that room noise is a guarantee. Whenever
Speaker 1: they're at the White House, in some office at the
Speaker 1: G seven whatever, take notice. Fox News for some reason
Speaker 1: pounds you with room noise from the gain on their
Speaker 1: mixing board. I don't know why, they just do it,
Speaker 1: and I just really knowed it because it was unnerving me.
Speaker 1: But anyway, back to what Trump's saying. Pay attention to
Speaker 1: what he's saying, not the room noise. Try to ignore it, okay, please, It.
Speaker 10: Were just you know, I don't know if you're looking
Speaker 10: at the stats, but thousands of people are being killed
Speaker 10: a week, soldiers, mostly because the towns have been destroyed.
Speaker 5: It's thousands of soldiers. This was a very bad week,
Speaker 5: by the way. I get the stats, and you're talking
Speaker 5: about a human life.
Speaker 10: And number one, I want to see that, and it
Speaker 10: doesn't involve American soldiers, but it's Russian and Ukrainian soldiers
Speaker 10: that I can think.
Speaker 5: I think I'm speaking for both.
Speaker 10: Number one, we want to see that stop, and number two,
Speaker 10: I want to stop paying the kind of money that
Speaker 10: we're talking about.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm glad Trump doesn't want to just see
Speaker 1: wholesale murder on the planet at all times. And of
Speaker 1: course we're talking about Russian and Ukrainian troops. Ukraine has
Speaker 1: been invaded by Russia. Therefore, guess what, that's the dead
Speaker 1: troops that should be there. And if somebody else is dying,
Speaker 1: it's unusual anyway, isn't it strange that it goes to that?
Speaker 1: And also take note, he says several times, I get
Speaker 1: the stats, I see the stats. It's like he's reading
Speaker 1: box scores on the war. I got to tell you,
Speaker 1: when somebody's that disconnected from it, he's not seeing the
Speaker 1: photographs of it. Other present and tell you they saw images,
Speaker 1: they saw satellites, they saw photographs. Oh well, then again,
Speaker 1: he's banned the AP and usually they have the AP
Speaker 1: photographers on the ground in war zones. So maybe he's
Speaker 1: missing it because of that. And he decided they were
Speaker 1: no good because of the Gulf of America and all
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. Also note to his set designer, publicist, whatever,
Speaker 1: get him the hell out of that weirdly colored, slightly
Speaker 1: shiny goldish chair. It's not a good look. And any
Speaker 1: president I've seen sit in this chair. Just when I
Speaker 1: see an old man sitting in a chair like that,
Speaker 1: I just think they must depede on it a lot.
Speaker 1: It's like that weird golden shower color. I'm not supposed
Speaker 1: to mention that when we're talking Trump. I'm sorry, back
Speaker 1: to Trump's words forget about my observations.
Speaker 10: We're helping, and we're helping NATO, but we're helping a
Speaker 10: lot more than anybody.
Speaker 5: Else by far, and I want that to stop.
Speaker 12: Well, so.
Speaker 5: You're having a Jeff, Thank you, sir.
Speaker 3: You talked about Trey Terris this morning on yours. Just
Speaker 3: a question about China. Ten terrace has already been implemented
Speaker 3: on China. Are you any to do a ten above?
Speaker 1: This will be an.
Speaker 5: Additional ten above it?
Speaker 3: And is there from the talks with Canada and Mexico
Speaker 3: so far?
Speaker 5: Are you not seeing the progress that you.
Speaker 1: Wanted in order?
Speaker 5: I don't see it at all now, not on drugs.
Speaker 5: We've done a great job.
Speaker 10: If you look at Tom Holman, he's been incredible and Christie,
Speaker 10: they've done a great job in terms of the border.
Speaker 5: But the drugs continue to pour into our country.
Speaker 10: Killing hundreds of thousands of people. We're losing substantially more
Speaker 10: than one hundred thousand people.
Speaker 5: I mean, they're dead.
Speaker 10: The families are destroyed after that happened, So it's you know,
Speaker 10: it's not just that that's the ultimate, but families are
Speaker 10: absolutely destroyed. The drugs come in through Mexico. They come
Speaker 10: a lot of them, not all of them, but a
Speaker 10: lot of them come from China. And that's why we
Speaker 10: did that ten it's ten plus ten. Okay, was there
Speaker 10: confusion on that ten plus ten. It's a second tent,
Speaker 10: and I think you'll I think you're going to see eventually,
Speaker 10: you're going to see drug stopping because the country should
Speaker 10: not be allowing those drugs.
Speaker 5: To come into the United States of American. We're not
Speaker 5: going to allow it to happen.
Speaker 10: So that goes on on the fourth of March, and
Speaker 10: then on the second of April, we have reciprocal tariffs.
Speaker 10: That's reciprocal where we charge countries what they're charging us,
Speaker 10: and nobody should have a problem with that.
Speaker 5: We have reciprocal it's reciprocity.
Speaker 10: It's something that I think everybody I've spoken to said
Speaker 10: that's fair, and it is. If somebody charges us twenty
Speaker 10: five percent, we charge them twenty five If somebody charges
Speaker 10: us ten or fifteen or thirty or seventy, we charge
Speaker 10: them an exact like amount.
Speaker 5: And it's pretty simple. But it's reciprocal tariffs.
Speaker 10: Because the United States has been taken advantage of by many,
Speaker 10: many different countries, including our friends, friend and foe, and
Speaker 10: in many cases our friends took bigger advantage of And
Speaker 10: when you talk about the EU, we're talking about the EU.
Speaker 10: The EU has been really very bad to us in
Speaker 10: terms of trade. And I'm a different kind of a president.
Speaker 5: I can't let that happen. Thank you. What would you
Speaker 5: be willing to do?
Speaker 17: Blaman prison did not stick to the terms of any
Speaker 17: deal on Ukraine.
Speaker 5: Do you know why he did not stick to the
Speaker 5: terms of any deal on your train?
Speaker 1: Because he's a street of not sticking to his word
Speaker 1: when it comes to international people.
Speaker 5: I think I'll keep his word. I think I think
Speaker 5: he's I've spoken to him. I've known him for a
Speaker 5: long time. Now, you know we had we had to
Speaker 5: go through the Russian hooks together. That was not a
Speaker 5: good thing.
Speaker 12: It's not fair.
Speaker 5: That was a rigged deal that had nothing to do
Speaker 5: with Russia. It was a rigged deal with inside the country.
Speaker 5: They had to put up with them too. They put
Speaker 5: up with a lot It wizard just us they had.
Speaker 5: I've known him for.
Speaker 1: And I think you will. And I don't believe he's.
Speaker 3: Going to violate his word.
Speaker 17: I don't think he'll be back when we make it deal.
Speaker 17: I think the deal is going to hold. No, they're
Speaker 17: going to have more security. You're gonna have security. You're
Speaker 17: gonna have more soldiers. I know France wants to be that.
Speaker 17: He's the president has said he wants to have soldiers.
Speaker 17: I don't think we're going to even be necessary. But
Speaker 17: I don't think there'll be.
Speaker 18: Any problem with keeping the deal with the security. You
Speaker 18: want to say something, I was just going to say,
Speaker 18: I mean, the deal, if we got it, is going
Speaker 18: to be hugely important.
Speaker 6: I don't think it would have happened if the space
Speaker 6: hadn't been created for it by yourself. But if there's
Speaker 6: a deal in we've got to make sure it's a
Speaker 6: deal that lasts, that is not temporaries that lasts. And
Speaker 6: that's why we need to make sure that it's secure.
Speaker 6: And we've lent in and said we'll play out part,
Speaker 6: and we've talked and we will talk about.
Speaker 1: Have you ever noted any other president being praised by
Speaker 1: everybody who sits in the room, and they always look
Speaker 1: to make sure that he's giving that tight lipknot of
Speaker 1: approval when everybody praises him only because of your efforts,
Speaker 1: mister president, only because of your greatness, mister president, only
Speaker 1: because of it was almost a surprise that he said,
Speaker 1: we're being given a respect and honor for the country,
Speaker 1: being invited by the King of England. Also, I'm not
Speaker 1: impressed by the bloodline of the King of England. The
Speaker 1: Germans have taken over Britain as the royal family. Weird situation.
Speaker 1: And no, no, no, Queen Carmela Carmela Parker Bowles right,
Speaker 1: Carmela Kamala, Carmela Kamala. No, that was the chicken that
Speaker 1: ran for president terribly here, tremendously hugely. You got to
Speaker 1: use those words there, you go, this is a white
Speaker 1: man using the word hugely. It's almost as good as
Speaker 1: me saying tremendously. But people never heard it like that before,
Speaker 1: so it's a new thing. They got to get aware
Speaker 1: of it, you know.
Speaker 6: Yeah, how we work with yourself, mister president, to ensure
Speaker 6: that this deal is something which is no farli it's
Speaker 6: very bolant a deal.
Speaker 7: We keep it that.
Speaker 1: You ever seen world leaders press and every cabinet of
Speaker 1: Vidual has to keep turning him go, yes, you're included.
Speaker 1: Of course you're very interesting since he's been a billionaire.
Speaker 1: Now they all do that, not criticizing it, just saying
Speaker 1: it's very interesting.
Speaker 5: And I think I can say that will be the
Speaker 5: easy part.
Speaker 10: That's the part we look forward to, because putting security there,
Speaker 10: that's the part we all look forward to.
Speaker 5: That's easy. The difficult part is getting the deal made.
Speaker 5: So but I think we've come along with did you
Speaker 5: have something else? Have such a He's got such a
Speaker 5: nice face, he's smiling.
Speaker 4: Radiocause you're both from different backgrounds.
Speaker 5: It's true. I think I can say this because we've
Speaker 5: known each other now really for a little while. This
Speaker 5: is not our first meeting.
Speaker 1: As you know.
Speaker 5: Uh, he loves his country, and so do I. That's
Speaker 5: our common our common theme. He loves his country and
Speaker 5: I love our country.
Speaker 10: And we also have two countries that have gotten along
Speaker 10: for the longest period of time, number one ally on
Speaker 10: each side, and we have good France and Australia.
Speaker 5: We have a lot of good ones.
Speaker 10: But we've had a long time relationship, a long time,
Speaker 10: hundreds of years, and we like each other frankly, and
Speaker 10: we like each other's country and we love our country.
Speaker 5: And I think that's our common thread.
Speaker 1: They like me, I like them. You know, it's all
Speaker 1: good because we're all friends, and that's how we get along.
Speaker 8: Under said with where you were I'm the independent.
Speaker 5: Well that's good. It's he charged down. He charged down
Speaker 5: as a meat China.
Speaker 10: But the tariffs are paid eventually by American importers and
Speaker 10: consumers know that.
Speaker 5: No, I think they're paid for it by the country.
Speaker 5: But you know, look we can get into that.
Speaker 10: I had I put a lot of tariffs on in
Speaker 10: my first terran and we made tremendous amounts of progress
Speaker 10: because of those tariffs, and China paid US hundreds of
Speaker 10: billions of Dallas videons.
Speaker 5: We never had a because they took advantage and president.
Speaker 5: She's a friend of mine, but he knows better than anybody,
Speaker 5: took advantage of our country. He took advantage of presidents
Speaker 5: that didn't know what they were doing.
Speaker 1: And see now I'm starting to turn this down because
Speaker 1: you know, he's never been influenced and the Wani dogs
Speaker 1: are going amaze, but he's never been influenced by the
Speaker 1: Carl Sagan, you know, model of billions and billions and
Speaker 1: billions and billions, like he used to say on TV.
Speaker 1: Anybody remember Carl Sagan, you know when people watched educational TV. Wow. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it is what it is, right, folks, it is what
Speaker 1: it is. We are all along for the ride. And
Speaker 1: after all, this is certainly Trump and his supporter's world.
Speaker 1: And let's just see how well they do with it
Speaker 1: in the very near future. Right anyway, Send me those ideas,
Speaker 1: guest suggestions, volunteers, etc. I need it all at o'celli
Speaker 1: dot com. Click on the email icon and get to
Speaker 1: me any which way you can. I want to hear
Speaker 1: from you. Also would appreciate if you got a chance,
Speaker 1: if you can afford it, drop in something into the
Speaker 1: donation bucket PayPal dot com. There is a donate button
Speaker 1: on oelli dot com or you can find it on
Speaker 1: my link tree. And that's the only way I'll be
Speaker 1: able to survive in the coming months, in the coming year.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. No matter who you are, where you are,
Speaker 1: when you are. Remember I'm merely o'celly, all.
Speaker 12: Of you, show dot you, and.
Speaker 1: There you have it. We'll be live tomorrow night with
Speaker 1: the Friday Night call in show. I think Aaron Franz
Speaker 1: has a pre recorded interview and some other plans for
Speaker 1: his two hours. Anyway, the fun begins at eight pm
Speaker 1: Eastern on o'chelly dot com on Friday nights. Always does
Speaker 1: one way or another. Plus, we have a twenty four
Speaker 1: to seven stream on ochelly dot com radio. Check us
Speaker 1: out on your radio streams and hell I'll put that
Speaker 1: in the show notes this week too. So there's my
Speaker 1: breakdown of the news that's already broken and hopefully you're not.
Speaker 1: No matter who you are, where you are, when you are. Yes, indeed,
Speaker 1: I am O'Kelly, all of you, all of you