WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.680 --> 00:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listen Saints KFI AM six forty, the Bill Handles

2
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>show on demand on the iHeartRadio FFI Handle here and

3
00:00:09.599 --> 00:00:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the Morning Crew. It is a Monday morning, October twenty eighth.

4
00:00:13.160 --> 00:00:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Week from tomorrow is the presidential election. Man, it is

5
00:00:17.079 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be just insane this year, I mean beyond insane.

6
00:00:22.679 --> 00:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>To give you an example, I'm going to talk more

7
00:00:24.480 --> 00:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>about this in the next day or two. To give

8
00:00:26.839 --> 00:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you an example, over one hundred lawsuits have already been filed.

9
00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:36.039
<v Speaker 2>In this presidential election.

10
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine what's going to happen at the end

11
00:00:40.679 --> 00:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the election.

12
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to know for several days who wins

13
00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>or not. Tell you one thing, we know for a.

14
00:00:44.799 --> 00:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Fact that well, I know for a fact Donald Trump

15
00:00:47.320 --> 00:00:50.359
<v Speaker 1>will not accept. If Kamala Harris wins, simply will not

16
00:00:50.439 --> 00:00:53.799
<v Speaker 1>accept it. Is there a chance that she's not going

17
00:00:53.799 --> 00:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to accept? Smaller And I just can't wait for this

18
00:00:57.679 --> 00:00:59.439
<v Speaker 1>thing to blow up. And I'm going to talk about it.

19
00:00:59.439 --> 00:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think tomorrow we're going to talk about what are

20
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the possibilities, and I'm going to talk about Halloween coming up.

21
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:09.159
<v Speaker 1>But first let's talk about polling, because all this week

22
00:01:09.159 --> 00:01:12.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pay attention to the polls, and here

23
00:01:12.519 --> 00:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>are the perception about polls and models of polling. These

24
00:01:17.560 --> 00:01:20.359
<v Speaker 1>are raw snapshots of public opinion.

25
00:01:20.519 --> 00:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>This is what it is.

26
00:01:21.719 --> 00:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's what happened yesterday when a recent poll was taken.

27
00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:28.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, those aren't snapshots.

28
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:34.719
<v Speaker 1>That's simply false because the data, real data, is massaged

29
00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>based on possibly reasonable results, just judgments made by polsters

30
00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:48.079
<v Speaker 1>and forecasting stages who interpret and adjust the numbers before

31
00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:51.519
<v Speaker 1>presenting them to the public. And this happens all the time,

32
00:01:52.280 --> 00:01:55.359
<v Speaker 1>where you have these numbers that are looked at and

33
00:01:55.560 --> 00:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>then they are massage.

34
00:01:57.319 --> 00:01:58.599
<v Speaker 2>You don't get raw numbers.

35
00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>What we yet numbers after the pollsters have done their polling,

36
00:02:04.879 --> 00:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have done the questioning. Then we have to look at

37
00:02:06.920 --> 00:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>what was the question, how was it asked, who answered it,

38
00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and try to break that down, break that down demographically.

39
00:02:16.680 --> 00:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's become really difficult.

40
00:02:18.439 --> 00:02:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Even sampling random sampling in the digital age have become

41
00:02:23.800 --> 00:02:27.479
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, even more so, which means that without the

42
00:02:27.479 --> 00:02:31.159
<v Speaker 1>corrections they put in there, the numbers wouldn't be representative.

43
00:02:32.199 --> 00:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And therefore everything that's representative or everything that's told to

44
00:02:37.319 --> 00:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>us includes a margin for error, right plus plus or

45
00:02:41.439 --> 00:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>minus three points. Well, we really don't know. We have

46
00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>no idea. What we do see is the end product.

47
00:02:50.719 --> 00:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, let's say Donald Trump in one of the

48
00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>battleground states has fifty point two percent, not fifty point

49
00:02:59.080 --> 00:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Fifty point two percent. What the hell does

50
00:03:03.800 --> 00:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Does that mean that's his chance of winning

51
00:03:06.680 --> 00:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the presidency? Fifty point two with a three percent margin

52
00:03:12.039 --> 00:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of error? Okay, that's nothing. So these you think, then

53
00:03:17.479 --> 00:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>therefore forty seven to fifty one or forty eight to

54
00:03:20.439 --> 00:03:22.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty one, Therefore it's a real number.

55
00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>It is not. It gives us an impression of certainty.

56
00:03:27.680 --> 00:03:32.199
<v Speaker 2>There is no certainty. Now. Early American polls, I'm gonna

57
00:03:32.199 --> 00:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>give you a little bit of.

58
00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>History here, were completely unscientific, but you look at them

59
00:03:39.280 --> 00:03:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and you go, wow, they were right on. For example,

60
00:03:42.240 --> 00:03:45.759
<v Speaker 1>earliest part of the twentieth century, there was a magazine

61
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>called The Literary Digest, which sent sample ballots to millions

62
00:03:51.599 --> 00:03:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of its readers. That's how they would figure out to

63
00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:58.479
<v Speaker 1>its readers. And to give you an idea of how

64
00:03:58.520 --> 00:04:02.159
<v Speaker 1>many people sent those ballots. By the way, the magazine

65
00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:05.639
<v Speaker 1>correctly predicted the winner of every presidential election from nineteen

66
00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to nineteen thirty six, and this is just sending

67
00:04:10.759 --> 00:04:17.399
<v Speaker 1>out sample ballots. And in thirty six Franklin Roosevelt ran

68
00:04:17.439 --> 00:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>against alf Landon and the Digests sent out ten million

69
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:26.759
<v Speaker 1>sample batlets and receive two point four million back. This

70
00:04:26.839 --> 00:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is a response rate of twenty four percent. Today, if

71
00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:37.199
<v Speaker 1>polsters get a two percent response rate, that's considered insanely good.

72
00:04:37.560 --> 00:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four percent. So based on those here's what the

73
00:04:41.839 --> 00:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Digest predicted. FDR would receive forty one percent of the

74
00:04:47.639 --> 00:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>vote and he would be slaughtered by alf Landon. Instead

75
00:04:53.519 --> 00:04:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of forty one percent of the vote, FDR gets sixty

76
00:04:56.439 --> 00:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the vote. It was a land slide,

77
00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean a massive landslide.

78
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:06.639
<v Speaker 2>So why what happened? Why did the poll fail?

79
00:05:07.800 --> 00:05:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's who they here's who answered the polls, and

80
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:13.399
<v Speaker 1>here's who read the Digest.

81
00:05:14.040 --> 00:05:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Right.

82
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:18.879
<v Speaker 1>They got their people from directories of automobile and telephone

83
00:05:18.879 --> 00:05:23.439
<v Speaker 1>ownership during the depression. Guests who owned telephones and cars

84
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>during the depression wealthy people. Matter of fact, during the Depression,

85
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:31.199
<v Speaker 1>there were people didn't have electricity. This is when the

86
00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Valley Authority, established by FDR, electrified the entire Tennessee Valley,

87
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>which had no electricity, and so what happened was land

88
00:05:41.720 --> 00:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and supporters were far more likely to send back their

89
00:05:45.879 --> 00:05:49.759
<v Speaker 1>samples and FDR reporters, making the poll not just completely

90
00:05:49.839 --> 00:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>useless but wildly misleading.

91
00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:58.279
<v Speaker 2>And because of that you had more scientific.

92
00:05:57.720 --> 00:06:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Polls that were created, like the one that was neered

93
00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>by George Gallup. And we're gonna look at poles all week,

94
00:06:05.160 --> 00:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and we think that polls within the margin three points

95
00:06:09.040 --> 00:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up or down are legitimate, which means that everything is

96
00:06:12.560 --> 00:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there dead heat right now. But the reality is polls

97
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't really that scientific, even though they're getting more and

98
00:06:19.360 --> 00:06:24.199
<v Speaker 1>more scientific. So the logic of quote a scientific poll

99
00:06:24.920 --> 00:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty straightforward. You get a truly random sample from

100
00:06:29.800 --> 00:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a broad range of the population in which every person

101
00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has about an equally likely chance of being included.

102
00:06:37.720 --> 00:06:40.439
<v Speaker 2>In the poll. Then you pull the stats out.

103
00:06:41.079 --> 00:06:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, if you've got one hundred million voters or one

104
00:06:43.480 --> 00:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million voters, you can't very well poll

105
00:06:47.079 --> 00:06:49.519
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty million people, so you.

106
00:06:49.480 --> 00:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Pull a sampling.

107
00:06:51.439 --> 00:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And here is the scary part which I've never understood.

108
00:06:55.600 --> 00:06:59.079
<v Speaker 1>The pollsters tell us, if a poll is done well,

109
00:06:59.800 --> 00:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you can get a legitimate poll with about twelve hundred respondents.

110
00:07:06.879 --> 00:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>The way Nielsen.

111
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Works in terms of for example, television, right, Let's say

112
00:07:13.319 --> 00:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you have one hundred million people or one hundred and

113
00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:20.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty million people watching television on a given night. They'll

114
00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ask twelve hundred people what they're watching, and based on that,

115
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you now have a show that is number one or

116
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>number forty five.

117
00:07:31.800 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>And you go, that's crazy. Well that's what they say.

118
00:07:35.199 --> 00:07:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It's significant if it's truly a random samples. However, how

119
00:07:41.399 --> 00:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>do you get them? Okay, telephone book and you call them,

120
00:07:47.160 --> 00:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or you have a voter registration the roles of voter registration.

121
00:07:53.680 --> 00:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I know people that will not register to vote because

122
00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be on jury duty, which means

123
00:07:58.600 --> 00:07:59.399
<v Speaker 1>they're never going.

124
00:07:59.279 --> 00:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>To be asked. How many of those does that skew

125
00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the poll could be? And how about those that say

126
00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:08.319
<v Speaker 2>it's a telephone.

127
00:08:09.120 --> 00:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at a phone now that they're done on

128
00:08:11.079 --> 00:08:13.279
<v Speaker 1>cell phones, you don't see the number.

129
00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Are you gonna answer the poll? No, because you're gonna

130
00:08:16.959 --> 00:08:18.759
<v Speaker 2>recognize the number. You're not going to answer the phone.

131
00:08:19.240 --> 00:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>When I answer the phone and it's a polster, I go,

132
00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not interested in taking the poll.

133
00:08:23.519 --> 00:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It takes too long, not interested, and so the numbers

134
00:08:28.360 --> 00:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are completely skewed.

135
00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And here's one, here's a great one.

136
00:08:33.720 --> 00:08:36.279
<v Speaker 1>There was a study out of the University College London

137
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and tested various methods found in eighty two percent of

138
00:08:41.799 --> 00:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>participants in a survey lied about themselves to either get

139
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into the poll because it makes them feel important, or

140
00:08:51.639 --> 00:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to get paid. And they do pay a small amount

141
00:08:54.039 --> 00:08:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of money. I think the radio pollsters, don't they, Neil,

142
00:08:58.399 --> 00:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you were involved in that for a peer time when

143
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you were in management looking at the ratings. Weren't people

144
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:08.799
<v Speaker 1>in the days we had diaries, people would write down

145
00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Because we didn't have the technology, people just write down

146
00:09:11.559 --> 00:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>what they wrote.

147
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that we're allowed to talk about it,

148
00:09:14.799 --> 00:09:15.399
<v Speaker 2>quite honestly.

149
00:09:15.600 --> 00:09:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about history. Are we not allowed to talk

150
00:09:18.759 --> 00:09:20.799
<v Speaker 1>about what happened historically?

151
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:23.720
<v Speaker 2>All right? I'll give it to you. All right.

152
00:09:24.240 --> 00:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's the bottom line, based on information that KFI

153
00:09:29.759 --> 00:09:35.039
<v Speaker 1>has gotten scientifically. Nobody listens to this show, but thank

154
00:09:35.080 --> 00:09:36.519
<v Speaker 1>you very much for not listening.

155
00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Am I allowed to say that, Neil?

156
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter if I say yes or no what

157
00:09:44.639 --> 00:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say? And the other thing that happens

158
00:09:48.120 --> 00:09:50.799
<v Speaker 1>in polling and I'll finish up with this to give

159
00:09:50.799 --> 00:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you an idea of just how weird it is. Different

160
00:09:54.039 --> 00:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>demographics have different weights. What does waiting mean based on

161
00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that certain group of people respond to polls

162
00:10:02.440 --> 00:10:06.759
<v Speaker 1>in different percentages? For example, what they go after White

163
00:10:06.759 --> 00:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>people they respond in x percent. Hispanics respond fewer that

164
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are asked for the polling.

165
00:10:14.799 --> 00:10:15.759
<v Speaker 2>They're weighted more.

166
00:10:16.159 --> 00:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you have fifty whites, they are weighted

167
00:10:21.639 --> 00:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>less than fifty Hispanics because the Hispanics.

168
00:10:25.480 --> 00:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm just throwing something out. It's not necessarily Hispanics or anything.

169
00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:32.399
<v Speaker 1>But just different demographics are weighted differently, where the numbers

170
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>may point out to one thing, but the waiting is different.

171
00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Waiting weight like in weights. And so this whole thing

172
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:45.919
<v Speaker 2>is so difficult to understand.

173
00:10:46.480 --> 00:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>It's so there's so statistics involved, so many statistics involved,

174
00:10:51.200 --> 00:10:56.919
<v Speaker 1>that the world of polling is so insanely complicated. Oh

175
00:10:56.960 --> 00:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing. How about this. Every campaign has

176
00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>their own pollsters. There are Democratic pollsters that work for

177
00:11:05.679 --> 00:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party, and there are Republican polsters that work

178
00:11:09.960 --> 00:11:15.799
<v Speaker 1>for the Republican Party. And the best story about polling is,

179
00:11:16.000 --> 00:11:18.519
<v Speaker 1>I think who I'm trying to remember who The pollster

180
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was for Jimmy Carter. But over the weekend he told

181
00:11:23.279 --> 00:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Carter was in pretty good shape with Ronald Reagan.

182
00:11:25.360 --> 00:11:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Polling wise, it was pretty close. And it all collapsed

183
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:30.399
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend.

184
00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Before the vote, and he had to tell Jimmy Carter,

185
00:11:33.679 --> 00:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you're going to lose the race.

186
00:11:36.279 --> 00:11:37.879
<v Speaker 2>And Carter wouldn't believe him.

187
00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>He said, look at my look at what's going on.

188
00:11:41.720 --> 00:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at how close we are. And the

189
00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pollster said, uh uh, your polls.

190
00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Are collapsing, and he was right, So there are. And

191
00:11:51.440 --> 00:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why I threw that in there. It's

192
00:11:52.759 --> 00:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>just a great little bit of history. I wanted to

193
00:11:54.320 --> 00:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>share with you. But as we look at the polls,

194
00:11:57.600 --> 00:11:58.679
<v Speaker 2>keep in mind.

195
00:11:58.919 --> 00:12:03.159
<v Speaker 1>That, yeah, well they can be wrong big time. Look

196
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:06.759
<v Speaker 1>at the polls that were with Look at Hillary versus

197
00:12:07.320 --> 00:12:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump in twenty sixteen.

198
00:12:10.039 --> 00:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm the one that says she's gonna win. Look at

199
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the poles she's gonna win.

200
00:12:12.519 --> 00:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Look at the polls, and the last minute it turned

201
00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:15.799
<v Speaker 1>around for a whole bunch of reasons.

202
00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:17.519
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we're gonna talk more.

203
00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>About the polls coming up over this path over this

204
00:12:19.679 --> 00:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>next week, because well this election is completely completely insane.

205
00:12:24.799 --> 00:12:26.759
<v Speaker 1>And this is when it's a good thing to be

206
00:12:26.759 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in the world of talk on radio because we

207
00:12:30.120 --> 00:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>get to play with this thing like very few people do.

208
00:12:32.679 --> 00:12:34.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, hey, why don't we do this? Do they

209
00:12:34.799 --> 00:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have a case with Wayne and me? Wayne, just go

210
00:12:37.840 --> 00:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>right into it.

211
00:12:38.679 --> 00:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we have.

212
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna love this case. Two law firms. Learner and

213
00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Row is one of them. The other one is the

214
00:12:44.240 --> 00:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Accidental Law Group. Didn't they write a musical Learner in Row,

215
00:12:48.960 --> 00:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>great musician? Most one of them did. Okay, So the

216
00:12:53.879 --> 00:13:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Accident Law Group engages in what's called conquesting. This is

217
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:05.399
<v Speaker 3>where you buy a search term on Google in the

218
00:13:05.480 --> 00:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>name of your competitor, so that when people search for

219
00:13:08.879 --> 00:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>your competitor, they will be directed first in the search

220
00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>results to your website. And this is what the Accident

221
00:13:16.360 --> 00:13:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Law Group did. They bought Learner and Row as a

222
00:13:19.200 --> 00:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>search term. Now, of course, Learner and Row is trademarked

223
00:13:21.720 --> 00:13:24.919
<v Speaker 3>by Learner and Row, so as you might imagine, Learner

224
00:13:24.960 --> 00:13:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and Row said, uh, we are suing you for trademarked infringement,

225
00:13:28.679 --> 00:13:32.840
<v Speaker 3>violating the Lanham Act and the Accident And one thing

226
00:13:32.840 --> 00:13:35.919
<v Speaker 3>you should know about conquesting is in and of itself,

227
00:13:36.000 --> 00:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>it's totally legal and it is quite common. So the

228
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Accident Law Group says, we have done nothing wrong because, yes,

229
00:13:46.559 --> 00:13:51.440
<v Speaker 3>it's true, when people search for you, they're the first

230
00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:52.720
<v Speaker 3>search result is US.

231
00:13:52.799 --> 00:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

232
00:13:54.039 --> 00:13:57.480
<v Speaker 3>But once they click on us, we in No, it's

233
00:13:57.600 --> 00:13:58.759
<v Speaker 3>very clear it's us.

234
00:13:58.879 --> 00:14:01.919
<v Speaker 2>It's very clear it's not you. It's very clear it's us.

235
00:14:02.240 --> 00:14:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, there is no consumer confusion, and you must have

236
00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:11.720
<v Speaker 3>consumer confusion to be in violation of the Lanham Act

237
00:14:11.720 --> 00:14:19.519
<v Speaker 3>and have a trademark claim. So the lower court says, yeah,

238
00:14:19.639 --> 00:14:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's maybe underhanded in some way, but it's

239
00:14:22.759 --> 00:14:26.519
<v Speaker 3>not illegal. So Learner and Row go up to the

240
00:14:26.600 --> 00:14:30.039
<v Speaker 3>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and so what do you

241
00:14:30.080 --> 00:14:33.519
<v Speaker 3>think about this? That is, if the resulting website does

242
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:36.200
<v Speaker 3>not in any way misrepresent itself.

243
00:14:37.600 --> 00:14:40.399
<v Speaker 1>This gets really interesting because there's a couple points here

244
00:14:40.440 --> 00:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring up.

245
00:14:42.000 --> 00:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>It certainly has.

246
00:14:42.960 --> 00:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>A smell test issue where it appears underhanded and sleezy,

247
00:14:48.519 --> 00:14:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and they're not even saying it's not underhanded and sleazy.

248
00:14:52.600 --> 00:14:55.159
<v Speaker 1>What it is is it's not confusing, and the law

249
00:14:55.240 --> 00:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>does not prohibit us from doing that. One of the

250
00:14:58.080 --> 00:15:02.559
<v Speaker 1>things the court could say, is there's no violation here,

251
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and if Congress wants to pass something that is violative

252
00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of law, pass the law that says you cannot do that,

253
00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and that.

254
00:15:09.879 --> 00:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Would be the easiest way out. I am, Oh, it's

255
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:14.919
<v Speaker 2>interesting which way I'm going to argue.

256
00:15:15.320 --> 00:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think their argument that it is not confusing and

257
00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:24.879
<v Speaker 1>confusion has to be an issue. I think that that

258
00:15:25.320 --> 00:15:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to prevail, even though it is the sleaziest

259
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:30.879
<v Speaker 1>underhanded thing.

260
00:15:31.159 --> 00:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It has happened to me.

261
00:15:32.080 --> 00:15:35.519
<v Speaker 1>By the way, just to let you know, you've gone

262
00:15:36.039 --> 00:15:40.639
<v Speaker 1>there are places where my name has been and it

263
00:15:40.679 --> 00:15:45.559
<v Speaker 1>immediately goes to a law firm that you know, I

264
00:15:45.799 --> 00:15:47.759
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with, and they do things that

265
00:15:47.799 --> 00:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I go, what are you doing? And they that's exactly

266
00:15:50.039 --> 00:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what they did. Now you know, was there any confusion, Well, yeah,

267
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there's all kinds of confusion confusing me with the law

268
00:15:58.360 --> 00:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in any way that's legitimate.

269
00:16:00.519 --> 00:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I get that. But I think what the court said,

270
00:16:06.200 --> 00:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>and this is.

271
00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they went on the language of the statute

272
00:16:15.799 --> 00:16:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that did not make that any kind of violation and

273
00:16:21.279 --> 00:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>agree that it was horrible. And I would say they said,

274
00:16:23.879 --> 00:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if Congress wants to change it, they can change it.

275
00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:28.519
<v Speaker 2>That's my take on that what happened? All right, that's

276
00:16:28.519 --> 00:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

277
00:16:29.200 --> 00:16:31.639
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm going to give you just a statistic here

278
00:16:31.679 --> 00:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>from the case, because, as you know, Learner and Row

279
00:16:34.679 --> 00:16:40.159
<v Speaker 3>would have to prove there was confusion. So they were

280
00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>able to get one hundred and nine thousand, three hundred

281
00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>and twenty two specific times that somebody searched for Learner

282
00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:51.679
<v Speaker 3>and Row and instead ended up at an alg website,

283
00:16:52.320 --> 00:16:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and in two hundred and thirty six of those instances,

284
00:16:56.960 --> 00:17:00.840
<v Speaker 3>the caller mentioned Learner in Row even though they were

285
00:17:00.879 --> 00:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>talking to Accident Law Group, which is a zero point

286
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:10.759
<v Speaker 3>two one percent of the total number of consumers that

287
00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:11.839
<v Speaker 3>were conquested.

288
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes good.

289
00:17:14.240 --> 00:17:18.119
<v Speaker 3>You feel stronger that there was not really actionable confusion.

290
00:17:18.240 --> 00:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think that's a good argument, saying there were

291
00:17:20.279 --> 00:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>so few that uh, and that's the only data out there.

292
00:17:23.519 --> 00:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>There were so few that were that actually were confused.

293
00:17:27.359 --> 00:17:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh. We were voting or were ruling in favor of

294
00:17:30.839 --> 00:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Learner and Learner and Low who wrote South Pacific.

295
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:39.759
<v Speaker 3>It's actually Accident Law Group that wins. They're the conquests, right.

296
00:17:39.640 --> 00:17:41.640
<v Speaker 2>That's what I That's what I basically didn't I say

297
00:17:41.640 --> 00:17:42.079
<v Speaker 2>that that's.

298
00:17:41.920 --> 00:17:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what you wanted to make your your Learner and

299
00:17:44.759 --> 00:17:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Low jokes.

300
00:17:46.160 --> 00:17:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's what I say against.

301
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Learner and Low, who wrote so many beautiful musicals. Yeah

302
00:17:53.680 --> 00:17:55.279
<v Speaker 3>all right, all right, well you got that one right.

303
00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's and that's a that's a little wonky and

304
00:17:58.480 --> 00:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>really interesting.

305
00:17:59.400 --> 00:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>This is what I love about this segment is you

306
00:18:01.640 --> 00:18:02.519
<v Speaker 2>come up with these.

307
00:18:02.400 --> 00:18:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Cases, have you made sure that you have purchased or

308
00:18:06.559 --> 00:18:09.640
<v Speaker 3>the people behind Handle on the Law have purchased Handle

309
00:18:09.680 --> 00:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Law on Google? Have you purchased Yeah, I

310
00:18:12.960 --> 00:18:16.039
<v Speaker 3>have Bill Handles show podcast on Google.

311
00:18:16.160 --> 00:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, somebody else.

312
00:18:18.119 --> 00:18:20.039
<v Speaker 1>And the point is that none of that is a

313
00:18:20.200 --> 00:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>referral service, and it goes to referral services that are

314
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>other people. And yeah, it's just really sleazy, to say

315
00:18:28.559 --> 00:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the least.

316
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:34.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, guys walking down the street with some friends celebrating

317
00:18:34.079 --> 00:18:39.319
<v Speaker 3>his birthday. There's some street musicians playing in a parking lot,

318
00:18:39.440 --> 00:18:42.839
<v Speaker 3>so this group stops to listen to the street musicians,

319
00:18:43.400 --> 00:18:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and here comes Sergeant Reginald Beasley Detroit p D, who,

320
00:18:48.759 --> 00:18:52.119
<v Speaker 3>for reasons that may never be known, is walking past

321
00:18:52.160 --> 00:18:55.240
<v Speaker 3>them with a couple of other officers and says to

322
00:18:55.319 --> 00:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>these four people who are standing on the sidewalk watching

323
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>the musicians and I'll have to censor it. But he goes,

324
00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:04.799
<v Speaker 3>he just walks by and he goes keep that ass moving.

325
00:19:07.400 --> 00:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So the birthday boy engages him in a little conversation

326
00:19:12.400 --> 00:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>about like why are you talking to us like that?

327
00:19:16.599 --> 00:19:21.039
<v Speaker 3>And then Sergeant Beasley says, you need to keep moving.

328
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:25.599
<v Speaker 3>So the birthday boy says, what why why can't we

329
00:19:25.680 --> 00:19:28.960
<v Speaker 3>just stand on the sidewalk, And then Sergeant Beasley says,

330
00:19:29.079 --> 00:19:33.640
<v Speaker 3>you have five seconds to get moving, and the birthday

331
00:19:33.640 --> 00:19:40.119
<v Speaker 3>boy says, or what? And then Sergeant Beasley goes five four,

332
00:19:41.000 --> 00:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>three and on two, grabs the guy's arm and pulls

333
00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:49.400
<v Speaker 3>his handcuffs out with the other hand, which is not

334
00:19:49.559 --> 00:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>fair because he said the guy had to the count

335
00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:58.119
<v Speaker 3>of five. So one of the friends grabs the guy.

336
00:19:58.240 --> 00:20:03.599
<v Speaker 3>Here the plaintiff grabs his arm, pulls him away, walks

337
00:20:03.680 --> 00:20:09.400
<v Speaker 3>him away from Sergeant Beasley, and then the birthday Boy's

338
00:20:09.519 --> 00:20:12.319
<v Speaker 3>girlfriend comes over to him and they're you know, she's

339
00:20:12.359 --> 00:20:18.599
<v Speaker 3>trying to like, hey man, let's not cause a scene whatever. Meanwhile,

340
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Sergeant Beasley has decided it's taser time, so he pulls

341
00:20:22.720 --> 00:20:23.440
<v Speaker 3>out his taser.

342
00:20:23.480 --> 00:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>He's pointing it at these two.

343
00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:30.200
<v Speaker 3>The girlfriend has her arms around her boyfriend a hug. Now,

344
00:20:30.240 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 3>I know you don't like hugs bill generally speaking, but

345
00:20:34.240 --> 00:20:39.079
<v Speaker 3>this sergeant apparently didn't like other people hugging. So while

346
00:20:39.160 --> 00:20:45.680
<v Speaker 3>the girlfriend is hugging her boyfriend, whose back is turned

347
00:20:45.799 --> 00:20:50.279
<v Speaker 3>to the sergeant, Sergeant Beasley tases him right in the back,

348
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:56.279
<v Speaker 3>and then they're both arrested for a resisting arrest. Now,

349
00:20:56.319 --> 00:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>they actually went to a trial and were acquitted.

350
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:05.079
<v Speaker 2>How it comes? How does the prosecution even go there?

351
00:21:05.759 --> 00:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, based on what you said, and then there

352
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:12.599
<v Speaker 1>are witnesses and I don't even see how that's going there.

353
00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, probably because Sergeant Beasley's side of the story is

354
00:21:18.359 --> 00:21:22.279
<v Speaker 3>that the birthday boy was resisting arrest.

355
00:21:22.680 --> 00:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but why was he being arrested? You got me? Okay.

356
00:21:29.359 --> 00:21:34.319
<v Speaker 3>This is now the lawsuit against sergeant Beasley for excessive force.

357
00:21:34.720 --> 00:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>He wants qualified immunity. I didn't violate anybody's constitutional right.

358
00:21:40.319 --> 00:21:43.599
<v Speaker 3>He was resisting arrest, so I tasted him, I'll have

359
00:21:43.640 --> 00:21:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you know. And this will probably wrap up the presentation.

360
00:21:47.000 --> 00:21:50.519
<v Speaker 3>The law in the Sixth Circuit is an officer can

361
00:21:50.640 --> 00:21:58.160
<v Speaker 3>taste somebody if they're actively resisting arrest, which requires violence

362
00:21:58.880 --> 00:22:05.160
<v Speaker 3>or a show of force or hostile language, coupled with

363
00:22:06.599 --> 00:22:09.119
<v Speaker 3>failing to comply with an officer's commands.

364
00:22:09.799 --> 00:22:10.519
<v Speaker 2>If it is.

365
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Passive resistance, you are not allowed to tasee somebody. So,

366
00:22:17.640 --> 00:22:23.279
<v Speaker 3>hearing what happened and Sergeant Beasley saying I should get

367
00:22:23.319 --> 00:22:28.319
<v Speaker 3>qualified immunity because he was actively resisting arrest, what do

368
00:22:28.400 --> 00:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>you think the Sixth Circuit did, given the description of

369
00:22:31.680 --> 00:22:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the facts that I've just given you.

370
00:22:33.079 --> 00:22:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, unless this is a trick question, no, I promise you,

371
00:22:38.559 --> 00:22:39.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't in my pocket.

372
00:22:39.720 --> 00:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how he could would be able to

373
00:22:43.359 --> 00:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>claim immunity, not only based on the facts as you

374
00:22:46.839 --> 00:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>describe him, but let's say there actually was some kind of.

375
00:22:51.599 --> 00:22:54.400
<v Speaker 2>A basis of immunity, something you could hang your hat on.

376
00:22:55.119 --> 00:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>In the most minor way, Beasley's acts were so egregious

377
00:23:00.759 --> 00:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that even if qualified immunity would somehow connect in the

378
00:23:05.480 --> 00:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>most minor way, he's gone beyond the pale in terms

379
00:23:09.960 --> 00:23:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of the egregiousness factor. So I think, I mean, that's

380
00:23:15.119 --> 00:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that's an easy one. I don't see how he could

381
00:23:16.680 --> 00:23:17.599
<v Speaker 1>possibly prevail one.

382
00:23:17.640 --> 00:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course, no, theF the officer now will face a

383
00:23:20.079 --> 00:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit for excessive force.

384
00:23:21.799 --> 00:23:23.319
<v Speaker 2>And how does he stay a lot.

385
00:23:23.359 --> 00:23:26.279
<v Speaker 1>How does he stay at an officer under those circumstances?

386
00:23:26.319 --> 00:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Now you know there's there are police officers who are

387
00:23:30.279 --> 00:23:32.519
<v Speaker 3>adjudicated against and stay on the force.

388
00:23:32.759 --> 00:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we don't at this point.

389
00:23:34.160 --> 00:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>We don't know right now the lawsuit goes forward, we

390
00:23:37.400 --> 00:23:38.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know what's going to happen.

391
00:23:38.559 --> 00:23:41.039
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what the Detroit PD is going to do.

392
00:23:41.480 --> 00:23:43.680
<v Speaker 3>But these people who were just trying to enjoy a

393
00:23:43.680 --> 00:23:45.519
<v Speaker 3>birthday were really put through a lot of Hell.

394
00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, immediately when you said it's taser time, I was

395
00:23:48.440 --> 00:23:50.559
<v Speaker 1>thinking of mc hammer and.

396
00:23:52.319 --> 00:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>The cops starting to dance around it's taser time.

397
00:23:55.599 --> 00:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, We'll talk again next week at eight point

398
00:23:58.880 --> 00:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty once again. Thanks way, all right, that's it, We're done, guys.

399
00:24:02.599 --> 00:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow morning we start all over again at five am

400
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:08.319
<v Speaker 1>wake up call with Amy and then Neil and I

401
00:24:08.400 --> 00:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>come aboard and we go through the show until right

402
00:24:11.160 --> 00:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>about now and tomorrow I'm gonna do the story of

403
00:24:15.400 --> 00:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the the apples with the razor blades in them for Halloween?

404
00:24:22.039 --> 00:24:22.640
<v Speaker 2>How true?

405
00:24:23.119 --> 00:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And did I really get in trouble when I tried

406
00:24:25.119 --> 00:24:28.079
<v Speaker 1>that a couple of years ago. I will come back

407
00:24:28.279 --> 00:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and you will to coming up.

408
00:24:32.680 --> 00:24:34.519
<v Speaker 2>What are we going to do? I don't know. We'll

409
00:24:34.519 --> 00:24:35.079
<v Speaker 2>see you tomorrow.

410
00:24:35.119 --> 00:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Everybody KFI AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.

411
00:24:40.240 --> 00:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to The Bill Handle Show.

412
00:24:42.079 --> 00:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Catch My Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,

413
00:24:45.480 --> 00:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
