Speaker 1: Since the next episode of Liberty Lockdown will not be
Speaker 1: up for another day or two, I'm gonna give you
Speaker 1: a little intermesto. I think that's a word. This is
Speaker 1: episode two of Dangerous Retards, not just a reminder. This
Speaker 1: is not like Liberty Lockdown. This is me and two
Speaker 1: lunatics talking lunatics stuff. So if that's not your cup
Speaker 1: of tea, you can skip this one, but I think
Speaker 1: most of you will enjoy it because it's funny and
Speaker 1: that time series. This particular episode was recorded just after
Speaker 1: Cash Bettel's confirmation, so about a week ago. Tomorrow, I'll
Speaker 1: be releasing episode three of Dangerous RTRD, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: is not retards. It's real talk, real dudes. It's totally
Speaker 1: totally mature. I'm not immature. I would never name my
Speaker 1: show Dangerous retards, but it's Dangerous rtrds, so you figure
Speaker 1: it out. Anyways, Hope you guys enjoy this one. You
Speaker 1: can subscribe to Dangerous Retards on YouTube, rumble everywhere else rtrds.
Speaker 1: I apologize, it's not retards. My god, how could I
Speaker 1: even say such a thing. All right, yeah, subscribe shared around,
Speaker 1: Love you guys.
Speaker 2: Peace.
Speaker 3: All right, we have an FBI director Cash Mitchell getting
Speaker 3: fifty one votes in a Senate wide confirmation vote just
Speaker 3: a moment ago to forty nine knows, which.
Speaker 2: Means that two Republican senators did not vote for him.
Speaker 2: For that and more.
Speaker 3: Let's go to Senior correspondent Chad Pergram, who's following all
Speaker 3: the moves on Capitol Hill chat.
Speaker 4: Good afternoon, John will Bernie Moreno, the Republican Center from Ohio,
Speaker 4: just read the vote total, fifty one to forty nine.
Speaker 4: Mitch McConnell, the former Republican leader who announced his retirement
Speaker 4: earlier today. He voted yes. Some people thought he might
Speaker 4: vote no. But there were two GOP knows you had,
Speaker 4: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of may So
Speaker 4: fifty one to forty nine. They did not need jd
Speaker 4: Vance here to break a tie in this instance. I
Speaker 4: should note that this is only the second nominee who
Speaker 4: has gotten more than one GOP no yet.
Speaker 2: This is dangerous. I'm not condemning these people. I'm not
Speaker 2: saying that they're bad people. I'm saying that they're dumb.
Speaker 1: Okay, you haven't figured out that you're being lied to
Speaker 1: by this machine yet You're a fucking idiot, and.
Speaker 2: I can't help you anymore.
Speaker 5: Aliens, dollar collapse, demolishing of the deep state, just because
Speaker 5: they've given you as a conspiracy there is everything you
Speaker 5: want to don't go on a victory tour, Gussie and
Speaker 5: strengthen your relationship with God.
Speaker 6: I know that we're almost in World War three.
Speaker 2: I just don't care.
Speaker 6: Then you retard it, and then everything above that is
Speaker 6: a in disrespect to God.
Speaker 3: I'm somebody that thought I could fix this, and I'm
Speaker 3: starting to think about having to eat my neighbors.
Speaker 2: Who round two, bitch, let's go by the way. It's
Speaker 2: such a banger.
Speaker 1: I assume since tough to the this is dangerous that
Speaker 1: he was gonna handle the intro. I'm Clint Russell, host
Speaker 1: of will Be Lockdown. We got the Nephliem Dusk squad boys.
Speaker 1: This is dangerous, retards. Check it out Episode two. Hello,
Speaker 1: Well yeah, I wasn't sure we should. We're working out
Speaker 1: the kings here. This is episode two. All right, I
Speaker 1: think I think we're nailing it.
Speaker 2: We're nailing it. We're gonna jump right in.
Speaker 5: Take a second to let everybody know though, that we
Speaker 5: do have our socials up and running.
Speaker 2: So dangerous r T R d S is everywhere.
Speaker 5: Dangerous Retards is on Rumble, It's on Odyssey, it's on YouTube,
Speaker 5: it's on Apple Podcast. So guys, while you're here listening,
Speaker 5: pick up that phone, go subscribe baby, because content is
Speaker 5: coming soon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like a fire hits hit subscription on all that.
Speaker 1: And then also, while you're at it, subscribe to lid
Speaker 1: Lockdown and that Flom Dusk Squad and fucking Tower game too. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's do the all four shout.
Speaker 2: Out, Clint.
Speaker 6: Let's let's just go right into this because, uh, this
Speaker 6: is something that I think you could speak. You could
Speaker 6: speak too, much better than either me or David. This dude,
Speaker 6: Cash Patel. You've debated him, you debate, did a panel,
Speaker 6: did a panel with him? Okay, you spoke with him,
Speaker 6: yeah you fuck you guys, fuck you guys did but
Speaker 6: you you actually you spoke about the FBI and either
Speaker 6: abolishing it or like just pushing it back and gutting
Speaker 6: it completely.
Speaker 1: I think that was his stance, right. Yeah, I'll give
Speaker 1: you the background just so people understand. You know, I've
Speaker 1: only met him once, but I did. I don't know
Speaker 1: if it was thirty minutes or an hour, But it
Speaker 1: was a panel with myself, Angela mccardial, former chair of
Speaker 1: the Libertarian Party, Brett Weinstein or Weinstein and Cash Battel
Speaker 1: and the name of the panel. It was at Freedom
Speaker 1: Fest in Las Vegas about six months ago, I think
Speaker 1: maybe eight months ago now, and it was called how
Speaker 1: to Defeat the Deep State? And the guy who was
Speaker 1: on this panel with me is now that.
Speaker 5: As of like a half an hour ago. Yeah, he's
Speaker 5: been confirmed. What do you think then, is he going
Speaker 5: to What do you expect to see from him?
Speaker 2: First?
Speaker 1: I think he's going to fire a hell of a
Speaker 1: lot of people. He seems to really understand, you know,
Speaker 1: how many people were working against Trump in the first
Speaker 1: go around, and you know, he kind of soft pedaled
Speaker 1: that he did what Bobby did you know to get AHHS.
Speaker 1: The last month they kind of shut the fuck up.
Speaker 1: They downplay all of their conspiracy theory theorizing, you know, publicly,
Speaker 1: And now I think he's going to go in there
Speaker 1: and just wreck shop. That's my expectation. If he doesn't
Speaker 1: do that, I will be disappointed.
Speaker 5: Well, firing people is maybe a little bit more aggressive.
Speaker 5: There's quite a bit of offering of severance packages going
Speaker 5: lately that I've seen to federal employees, something to the
Speaker 5: tune of like, what is like sixty thousand federal employees
Speaker 5: accepted the severance package.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's basically just an eight month buyout. You get
Speaker 1: your full salary for eight months. Look, that's that's what
Speaker 1: they have to do because the firing process for a
Speaker 1: federal employee is almost impossible, are very very challenging. So
Speaker 1: they're just like, hey, how about instead of, you know,
Speaker 1: taking the hard path, let's just incentivize. Let's bribe these
Speaker 1: people to leave. I think it's a good step. But
Speaker 1: in the FBI, I don't think you're going to have
Speaker 1: that many that accept the resignation. I think you're going
Speaker 1: to have to fire people, particularly the ones that are
Speaker 1: probably on the payroll for the real people that run
Speaker 1: this country. So I don't think I think you're going
Speaker 1: to have to fire some of these people. I mean
Speaker 1: some of these people literally tried to cool the sitting
Speaker 1: president of the United States, They try to frame him
Speaker 1: for treason. So do you think they're just gonna like
Speaker 1: sail off into the sunset? Like maybe, but I think that,
Speaker 1: like it's obvious that there was real real deep state
Speaker 1: activity to try and undermine Trump from nine years ago.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these are these are real deal spies at the
Speaker 2: highest level. Yeah.
Speaker 6: I think he might be playing some sort of a
Speaker 6: blood game. I think his job might be the probably
Speaker 6: the most dangerous out out of the three that have
Speaker 6: been confirmed, or the two that have been confirmed so far.
Speaker 6: You have an RFK junior whose job is very dangerous,
Speaker 6: Tulci Gabbert. She's dealing on the international level, very dangerous.
Speaker 6: But this guy is dealing with people that are completely cutthroat,
Speaker 6: that are here in the United that are United States
Speaker 6: citizens for the right, I assume for the most part.
Speaker 5: That's why I expect to see like sort of the
Speaker 5: death throws, Like I expect to see a lot of
Speaker 5: writhing in these in these coming days, just because I
Speaker 5: agree with you this is the most dangerous of the
Speaker 5: three when it comes to the implications and what he
Speaker 5: can get done. And really, you know, that's a threat
Speaker 5: to the sort of ambiguous deep state, and so I
Speaker 5: expect I don't think they're just gonna go willingly. I
Speaker 5: agree with that idea that this is going to ruffle
Speaker 5: some feathers. This isn't like, you know, giving a severance
Speaker 5: package to IRS workers. This is a little bit more nefarious,
Speaker 5: or at least they can't. And so yeah, I kind
Speaker 5: of am excited not to be, you know, into the
Speaker 5: doom and gloom, but I expect to see something taking place.
Speaker 2: I don't think they're just gonna walk. Well.
Speaker 1: The other reason that they probably won't quit is that
Speaker 1: what you've seen from the Trump administration so far is
Speaker 1: that he is ripping up their clearances. And that is
Speaker 1: the real gravy train for anybody that works in the
Speaker 1: deep state is that once you exit the federal government,
Speaker 1: if you still maintain your clearance, you still have access
Speaker 1: to top secret information. Basically you just sell that information
Speaker 1: to K Street or Wall Street, like the largest corporations.
Speaker 1: So if they're doing that still, which they are, I
Speaker 1: just don't see why these guys would leave like they're
Speaker 1: gonna drag their feet as hard as possible because that
Speaker 1: was their golden parachute. Fuck up in the FBI, or
Speaker 1: you know, some new administration comes in, they try and
Speaker 1: purge you.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's fine. Now you're just.
Speaker 1: Gonna go work for you know, Boeing or whatever, sit
Speaker 1: on the board and get million dollars a year.
Speaker 6: Let me ask you a question. This will pertain to
Speaker 6: our previous episode about the cartel debate. Do you think
Speaker 6: that these people are as ideological as I do. I'm
Speaker 6: talking about the FBI and the CIA, these deep state people.
Speaker 6: Do you think that when the money drives up, because
Speaker 6: like what you're describing is just money, they can sell
Speaker 6: this information to the media, They can go work for
Speaker 6: you know, corporations, doing whatever behind the scenes after they've
Speaker 6: they've made their deals. But if they've essentially taken their
Speaker 6: clearance away and they're no longer valuable assets and the
Speaker 6: money's dried up, do you think they hold a vendetta?
Speaker 6: Do you think they really bother? Put Like, the comparison
Speaker 6: that I'm going to make is like the war in
Speaker 6: the Middle East that wasn't a war like against the cartels.
Speaker 6: Cartel is money driven. The Middle East was ideological. We
Speaker 6: attack their religion and their culture and their homeland. This
Speaker 6: seems more like if we take the money away, like
Speaker 6: from the cartels, or like I would somebody.
Speaker 2: I forget who it was. I think it was Tristan Tate.
Speaker 6: He was He's like, I don't know how many cartel
Speaker 6: agents follow me or cartel members follow me. But I
Speaker 6: would advise you this, take your money and just get
Speaker 6: the fuck out because you've already gotten enough. What you're
Speaker 6: gonna get right now is probably drone targeted drone bombs
Speaker 6: on your million dollar houses. And I think that he's right.
Speaker 6: These people are motivated by money. What do you think
Speaker 6: about that?
Speaker 1: Uh, yeah, I think. I mean, there are clearly ideologues
Speaker 1: that exist within the federal government, particularly in the deep state.
Speaker 1: They perceive their power to be omnipotent. They are addicted
Speaker 1: to that power. It's not it's not this huge financial
Speaker 1: windfall to be a member of the deep state, like
Speaker 1: it's usually the money comes later, the power comes first,
Speaker 1: which is totally like inverted from the free market. Normally
Speaker 1: you get the money, then you have power in the government.
Speaker 1: It's like the power comes from your status, from being
Speaker 1: in the government itself. So for these people, I think
Speaker 1: it's not they're not you know, they're not jihaties. They're
Speaker 1: not gonna strap on a suicide vest and spread into
Speaker 1: a crowd of you know, Trump supporters or anything like that.
Speaker 1: But I think that like, if they have any avenue
Speaker 1: by which they get to undermine you know, Trump and
Speaker 1: his supporters, they will still do that. I think that
Speaker 1: the issue is that they won't have much power to
Speaker 1: do anything. And I think that's that's why I think
Speaker 1: cash Battel has a chance of actually really like rectifying
Speaker 1: so much of the evils that we were dealing with.
Speaker 1: Is that once you strip these people of their clearances,
Speaker 1: once you strip them of their you know, authoritative position
Speaker 1: in government, they're just nobody's They're nothing. And that's the
Speaker 1: other reason that they fought you know, Trump so hard,
Speaker 1: is that they know that like, once they're out, if
Speaker 1: they actually get stripped of all this, they're just fucking
Speaker 1: They're just these paper pushing DMV employees.
Speaker 2: Basically, Well, I I am.
Speaker 5: I said before that I'm kind of expecting something coming
Speaker 5: down the pipe in the way of like the death
Speaker 5: throws of the deep state, let's just call it. We
Speaker 5: have these two things happening right now where cash Betel
Speaker 5: is now head of the FBI, and you have RFK.
Speaker 5: He's handling all of this you know, health and nutrition
Speaker 5: apparatus here in the States, and you could make a
Speaker 5: huge argument that this deep state, if it truly does
Speaker 5: have its claws and all this, you know, all these
Speaker 5: various machinations that are leveraged against us. The medical apparatus
Speaker 5: is a huge one. You know, from the outside looking in,
Speaker 5: you could kind of reductively say that a massive portion
Speaker 5: of it is meant to just keep us sedated and
Speaker 5: keep us dumb. You know, we're over prescribing to the
Speaker 5: tune of what probably millions of people. I mean, that's speculative,
Speaker 5: but I don't think that we need to be on
Speaker 5: SSRIs and antidepressants and you know, all these different medications
Speaker 5: psychological medications that we are not twenty percent of us right, right, right,
Speaker 5: And that's probably I would imagine that those numbers are
Speaker 5: maybe a little bit because there's people that are self
Speaker 5: diagnosing and then they're going out and getting their hands
Speaker 5: on these things like Adderall has become kind of a
Speaker 5: you know, what would you call a recreational drug at
Speaker 5: this point, and it's rife within especially even in our community,
Speaker 5: right content creators, it's like, gotta stay sharp, gotta be articulate,
Speaker 5: gotta put the destiny. Yeah, no, I mean there's there's
Speaker 5: veracity to that.
Speaker 1: He's not just I was like, I don't know any
Speaker 1: podcasters that are taking but not even one I don't,
Speaker 1: But well, I don't know that.
Speaker 2: Maybe I do, but I don't know it factually.
Speaker 5: Well, I think more so in the media is where
Speaker 5: you get that. So journalists and things like that. You know,
Speaker 5: that's kind of an epidemic among journalists, and these are
Speaker 5: people that are self diagnosing.
Speaker 2: Much of them aren't.
Speaker 5: I've read articles and pieces from people that are like, yeah,
Speaker 5: in within journalism, uh, most of us are on adderall.
Speaker 5: I don't know that's anecdotal. I don't know how true
Speaker 5: it is. But if we do take that they act
Speaker 5: like crackheads, it kind of checks out. They do act
Speaker 5: like crackheads. They're pretty prolific crackheads too, So I mean,
Speaker 5: if you do take that at case value, that most
Speaker 5: of this apparatus is there to like sedate us right,
Speaker 5: to keep us in this kind of fog. The propaganda
Speaker 5: machine is levied against this. We're going after two and wait.
Speaker 5: Maybe even in that breath I just said the propaganda machine,
Speaker 5: legacy media is dying.
Speaker 2: That's a huge tool for them.
Speaker 5: The medical industry is going to be revamped in a
Speaker 5: huge way, and and so is our food right here
Speaker 5: in the West. That's a huge benefit for them. They
Speaker 5: used to use that to leverage against us. Not anymore,
Speaker 5: it seems. And now Cash Betel is the head of
Speaker 5: the FBI, and we're going after the cartels and things.
Speaker 5: I mean, we're really fucking with somebody's plan. We're really
Speaker 5: fucking with somebody's bottom dollar, and that's not going to
Speaker 5: bode well. I don't like I just going back to
Speaker 5: what I said before. I don't think you just walk
Speaker 5: away and go up. Looks like we lost the game.
Speaker 1: Guys, Well, I agree with you, but this is why
Speaker 1: I believe that Donald Trump has survived multiple assassination attempts.
Speaker 1: And you guys tend not to believe that, but you know,
Speaker 1: that plays perfectly into my thesis that those were in
Speaker 1: fact genuine attacks, that yes, he was challenging the establishment
Speaker 1: in a way that was existential, and as a consequence,
Speaker 1: they attempted to take him out. I can't prove that,
Speaker 1: you know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, but that's
Speaker 1: my assumption as of now. I want to play off
Speaker 1: what you were saying because I think that the metaphor
Speaker 1: of the you know, how corporate media figures lost their
Speaker 1: power or lose and their their stranglehold hold on the
Speaker 1: narrative is a great example of like your question earlier
Speaker 1: about all right, so what do the FBI agents do
Speaker 1: when they get stripped of their clearance and they're fired?
Speaker 1: Look at Don Lemon, you he speaks to an audience
Speaker 1: not much bigger than mine, right, Like, that's that's who
Speaker 1: he is now. He's basically a nobody. He's just another
Speaker 1: podcaster like us. It's like, because you lost the veneer
Speaker 1: of authority via CNN and just having it force fed
Speaker 1: into a bunch of boomers' brains. Uh, you know in
Speaker 1: in liberal states or cities, like you're not You're nobody now, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that's that's what will happened to them too.
Speaker 5: They lost the backing of Visor and Maderna, right, I
Speaker 5: mean those were those are your big financiers, and so you.
Speaker 2: Got that kind of money anymore.
Speaker 6: What's more interesting about that is guys like uh, Andrew
Speaker 6: Cuomo and Don Lemon, they have lost the veneer or
Speaker 6: the you know, the pedestal of CNN, right, and they're
Speaker 6: up here and now you see how they behave when
Speaker 6: they're by themselves, Like one has to work for Patrick K. David,
Speaker 6: the other one is just doing gaze and but CNN itself.
Speaker 6: It no longer has its venear either, because Donald Trump
Speaker 6: has uh, He's performed a masterful eight year plan of
Speaker 6: calling them fake news until they literally were fake news,
Speaker 6: and now they are nothing and Elon Musk has come
Speaker 6: along and replaced them. The one two punch of Donald
Speaker 6: Trump and Elon Musk really really worries me. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 6: it excites me, but it fucking makes me see you know.
Speaker 5: Why, because it's a it's a consolidation of power behind
Speaker 5: too charismatic and charismatic is a weird word to use
Speaker 5: when it comes to Elon Musk. He's much more charismatic
Speaker 5: in like action than he is in personality. He's kind
Speaker 5: of a weird guy. But still I think it's applicable.
Speaker 5: It's a consolidation of power behind he has he has
Speaker 5: star power, though he doesn't does have star power.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have weird because he doesn't he doesn't have
Speaker 1: he doesn't have speaking charisma. But like if you see
Speaker 1: him like people gravitate like he does have a star thing.
Speaker 5: Yeah, one hundred percent. Yeah, So in that way, I'm
Speaker 5: willing to use that terminology.
Speaker 6: Charismatic is just talking around with the goddamn ink baite
Speaker 6: on his chest. Clinton walking around with him fuing cyber
Speaker 6: truck body and shit, and somehow he's just crushing I mean.
Speaker 5: So my thing is like when you get a charismatic leader.
Speaker 5: So you said before, like we don't believe that Donald
Speaker 5: Trump got shot, and it's like I I'm here, I'm
Speaker 5: engaging in these conversations and I have to suspend this
Speaker 5: aspect of disbelief that I have in order.
Speaker 2: To I want to clarify that point.
Speaker 6: I don't believe that he got shot, but that doesn't
Speaker 6: mean that I don't think that they want to kill him. True,
Speaker 6: if I were Donald Trump, I would want to have
Speaker 6: stage that ahead of time and made it look crazy
Speaker 6: so that way they can get all the female Secret
Speaker 6: Service members off my detail. But like it just seems
Speaker 6: like something I'd want to get ahead of. Now, the
Speaker 6: guy in the bushes at his golf course probably, and
Speaker 6: there's probably tons of other ones that they will not
Speaker 6: will never report on will I mean, yeah, years later
Speaker 6: we'll get like, you know, declassified things like yeah, they
Speaker 6: were trying to kill him here, that's.
Speaker 1: Think there's been dozens of attempts on him.
Speaker 2: I'm sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, I mean, and and there's I mean, in fairness,
Speaker 1: there are attempts on every president like it's like, we.
Speaker 2: Don't care about it. He's got to be a measure,
Speaker 2: but he's yeah, he's he's a whole whole. Aren't they different?
Speaker 1: Different floor? But I'll go ahead. I want to.
Speaker 5: I was just gonna say, maybe you guys can explain
Speaker 5: this a little bit to me, but I don't want
Speaker 5: to step on this topic.
Speaker 2: At some point.
Speaker 5: I'd like to kind of understand what's going on with
Speaker 5: the whole Fork Knox Gold situation.
Speaker 2: It seems Elon Musk is before auditing. I want to.
Speaker 1: I want to play off of what Top was saying,
Speaker 1: how he's concerned about this, this dual force of Trump
Speaker 1: and Elon give you a perfect example. And this ties
Speaker 1: into episode one and Dangerous, where I was talking about,
Speaker 1: you know what the classification of terrorists of being applied
Speaker 1: to the cartels in Mexico and all of Latin America,
Speaker 1: because that's actually what they did. It was not just Mexico,
Speaker 1: and the cartels don't just exist in Mexico, Columbia and
Speaker 1: all over the place. What did what did Elon tweet
Speaker 1: out as soon as that news job he said, they're
Speaker 1: now eligible for drone strikes.
Speaker 2: That's what he said.
Speaker 1: And I was like, I was like, fuck, like horrifying,
Speaker 1: because it's horrifying because because and I just want to
Speaker 1: repeat to people, and I know I get called a
Speaker 1: pussy in a bitch every time I say this, but
Speaker 1: these cartel members live here, here, they are here, so
Speaker 1: so you now are essentially authorizing drone strikes, predator drone
Speaker 1: strikes on cartel members, potentially on domestic soil. And people
Speaker 1: are just like, well, what are you gonna do, Clint?
Speaker 1: You just want everybody to die from fentanyl. It's like, no, bitch,
Speaker 1: I'm saying. I'm saying, like, do you want to live
Speaker 1: somewhere where fucking predator drones are being you know, firing
Speaker 1: on on town homes and shit.
Speaker 5: Well that's why when we had this discussion on episode one,
Speaker 5: it wasn't so much that I disagreed with you that
Speaker 5: it was a bad idea. My contention was more from
Speaker 5: the angle of I think it's an inevitability, and I
Speaker 5: think that it's the time for decorum and figuring it
Speaker 5: out in a much neater fashion has long since passed.
Speaker 5: At the point where we might have to drone strike Colorado. Well,
Speaker 5: it's just like everything. It's everything that they give you.
Speaker 5: They're like, we're going to create and we're on YouTube,
Speaker 5: but soon to be off. We're going to create a virus,
Speaker 5: and then we're going to create a solution for you.
Speaker 5: It's like, problem, here's your solution. Problem, here's your solution.
Speaker 5: And it's like your problem.
Speaker 6: Here is now this the fentanyl trade and you know
Speaker 6: the cartels causing violence in America. Well we have a
Speaker 6: solution for you. But there still is a legitimate problem
Speaker 6: and it does need to be solved. You cannot have
Speaker 6: a function in country. We create a foreign nation running
Speaker 6: drugs through it and violence and crime.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't even think the drugs are my biggest issues.
Speaker 1: My biggest issue is the human trafficking. But regardless, like
Speaker 1: it's dangerous, these are killers, you know, So that's just
Speaker 1: not the point that I'm making though. The point that
Speaker 1: I'm making is that the terrorism designation opens up rendition, torture,
Speaker 1: drone strikes, I mean, full war on terror. Did the
Speaker 1: war on drugs go well? Did the war on terror
Speaker 1: go well?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: No, all right, let's combine the two and see how
Speaker 1: the fuck that goes? Okay, like good luck. You want
Speaker 1: to have that shit happening where you live, like I
Speaker 1: personally do not, So that's that's my concern. I want
Speaker 1: to close the border. I want to deport the violent motherfuckers.
Speaker 1: That should be the answer. I do not know why
Speaker 1: we have to classify these people.
Speaker 5: Because he lives in Miami. He's all uptight about it.
Speaker 5: There's a lot of cocaine dealers around here to be
Speaker 5: in trouble, man Sclin. We have it under control. It's
Speaker 5: it's at home now, we can control it's it's gonna
Speaker 5: be great now.
Speaker 2: That so much better.
Speaker 6: Imagine you're driving with your shirt off, with your your
Speaker 6: Corvette down the road and just like you're predator above,
Speaker 6: like a predator drone drops like this, precise one that's
Speaker 6: filled with spoons and forks and shit, and just kill
Speaker 6: some guy next to you. They've they've already set the precedent.
Speaker 6: And Trump has done this a number of times during
Speaker 6: his first administration. And one time, like a couple of
Speaker 6: weeks ago, they're like somebody in uh overseas I don't
Speaker 6: even know where, like in the Middle East somewhere I
Speaker 6: know they killed an Irnian like this, they drop a
Speaker 6: bomb on him. That's not quite an explosive, but it's
Speaker 6: like tax it's just super heavy and they can pinpoint,
Speaker 6: like they just blew up this guy's car and only
Speaker 6: him and everyone in his car dying, and you saw
Speaker 6: the pictures just filled with blood. So I'm like, they're
Speaker 6: telling us that they can do these targeted drones. And
Speaker 6: you're right, if we designate these people as a terrorist
Speaker 6: group and they are here in America, they're going to
Speaker 6: be doing this to them here.
Speaker 5: But how long until they do it to us? Well,
Speaker 5: hear me out, I have a much more effective plan.
Speaker 5: How much do you think that they're wasting in money
Speaker 5: when it comes to drone strikes and that kind of technology.
Speaker 5: I think what would be better is invested in an app.
Speaker 5: Everybody gets a it's a mandated app, and what it
Speaker 5: does is it tells you remember the shit locator for
Speaker 5: San Francisco, where it would tell you where the human
Speaker 5: shit is. This one tells you where an illegal migrant is,
Speaker 5: and it's your job to then go and you know,
Speaker 5: terminate them, take care of them.
Speaker 2: If you can prove.
Speaker 5: That they were an illegal migrant, well then the government
Speaker 5: pays you.
Speaker 6: And I think it's like after a while, we could,
Speaker 6: we could we could introduce this into ways where like
Speaker 6: when you see a cop, you just be like, terrorist,
Speaker 6: this is a this is a cartel member, and like
Speaker 6: is a cop over there? And then if if enough
Speaker 6: people report it, they just send a drum.
Speaker 1: I pray I'm gonna thrill you guys with some information
Speaker 1: you may not be aware of. But this ADO is no,
Speaker 1: it's not an app. But there are things called letters
Speaker 1: of mark and reprisal, and that is basically constitutional authority
Speaker 1: to allow for to deputize citizens to commit murders.
Speaker 5: And the imagine this Clint is in his primary color mobile.
Speaker 5: He's wearing no shirt, right, He's driving down the highway.
Speaker 5: All of a sudden he gets a notification. He cuts off,
Speaker 5: takes the first exit, leans his arm out the window,
Speaker 5: and cracks around off from his you know, his his
Speaker 5: his forty five. And then he looks at his account
Speaker 5: as it gets updated with money in real time.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: Well, there's there's plenty of illegals around here to do that.
Speaker 1: But uh this, We're gonna have to get this off
Speaker 1: of YouTube immediately.
Speaker 2: I think we can even.
Speaker 5: Joke dangerous retards is not is not long for YouTube.
Speaker 5: I don't know how we're going to navigate that.
Speaker 1: Like, I just wish we could make it clear that
Speaker 1: we're joking and then it just whatever we say is fine.
Speaker 2: But that's not how it works. The laughter, the laughter
Speaker 2: should be the cue.
Speaker 6: Right, I'm laughing because I genuinely enjoy it, but I'm
Speaker 6: not joking at all. This is a think tank. I
Speaker 6: want to be laughing because I'm tickled. Yeah, I've tackled
Speaker 6: at the thought of it developing the app. Yeah, I
Speaker 6: think it would be a great uh uh you know implementation.
Speaker 5: We'll see how it goes in the future. Should we
Speaker 5: pull this dream off YouTube and continue on or no.
Speaker 2: It's fine, We're gonna we'll keep going up.
Speaker 6: But it is it's it's worry it's it is worrying
Speaker 6: like my my old libertarian roots, because that that always
Speaker 6: comes back, whether like you know, the consolidation of government
Speaker 6: or what do they call it, the centralization of power
Speaker 6: is something that is happening before our eyes.
Speaker 2: And I didn't think that they could put me in
Speaker 2: a position where I'd celebrate it.
Speaker 6: And uh, I you know, me knowing what I know
Speaker 6: and coming from where I came from, and even you
Speaker 6: Clint to a certain level, you have to be celebrating this.
Speaker 2: They're they're auditing the I R s.
Speaker 1: Oh, you know, yeah, I've been very open about like
Speaker 1: he's doing so many things I agree with that I
Speaker 1: kind of I try not to flip out as much
Speaker 1: as I would about like these terrorism designations and shit
Speaker 1: like that. But I just want to be very clear
Speaker 1: with people that, like, I agree with eighty percent of
Speaker 1: what he's doing, but the twenty percent I hate, and
Speaker 1: like I think it's very, very dangerous. So I'm just
Speaker 1: I'm just trying to be fair, you know. But I
Speaker 1: still think that, like the lessons of the War on
Speaker 1: Terror are not lost, Like you don't, you don't, like
Speaker 1: you don't just then apply those same policies to our
Speaker 1: homeland and expect it to be great. Like that's fucking nuts.
Speaker 1: We have a bill of rights. I still believe in privacy.
Speaker 1: I still believe that, like, hey, collateral damage when it's
Speaker 1: an Afghani or Iraqi, like that's tragic, But guess what
Speaker 1: if it's my fucking family, Well then we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a real problem.
Speaker 2: So like that's where I get concerned.
Speaker 1: And and just one more point of clarification, my family
Speaker 1: almost all of them still live in San Diego. There's
Speaker 1: a border town, like, there's a real like. There are
Speaker 1: definitely cartel members that are just scattered throughout there.
Speaker 2: So it's nerve wracking. Man.
Speaker 5: Well, I don't know what you do instead, you know
Speaker 5: what I mean? I mean, as far as you just them, right,
Speaker 5: but I mean you.
Speaker 2: Don't drones strike them?
Speaker 5: Well, that would be one is dramatically more fun. And
Speaker 5: I can understand it from that point of view.
Speaker 2: I know you, I know you like the explosions, but
Speaker 2: come on, I'm just saying.
Speaker 5: If you have a federal job, it's a boring job,
Speaker 5: and all of a sudden, you can either you sign
Speaker 5: this piece of paper and they send somebody out to
Speaker 5: deport these people, or you hit this button and you
Speaker 5: get to watch through you know, your VR headset, this
Speaker 5: building get blown up and you get to watch the
Speaker 5: tick or the scoreboard go up.
Speaker 2: That's a lot more fun. You know what.
Speaker 1: You've convinced me, you're right, let's just launch as many
Speaker 1: drums these people.
Speaker 2: So okay, all right, all right.
Speaker 6: I want to ask this question as well, because there
Speaker 6: there is something to say about saying the thing.
Speaker 2: You know, like.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump is one of my favorite things he did
Speaker 6: during his first administration was say the thing and whether
Speaker 6: he did or not, he said it, and that was
Speaker 6: that that creates pausing people, that creates doubt, that actually
Speaker 6: gets sometimes people to behave in the way that you want.
Speaker 6: It's a threat and Elon must doing this like autistic
Speaker 6: threat like like like this. The question that he asked
Speaker 6: was along the lines of is mel Gibson really that
Speaker 6: buff these days? Right, it's a stupid it's a stupid
Speaker 6: question that he kind of knows the answer to, but
Speaker 6: he's like putting it out there and pushing the narrative.
Speaker 6: And the question is, so we can drome, we can
Speaker 6: droome bomb them then, right.
Speaker 5: The same Yeah, he's doing what you're doing. I'm just
Speaker 5: asking questions that it wasn't questions.
Speaker 2: It wasn't a question.
Speaker 1: Looking he said, he said, this means they're now eligible
Speaker 1: for drum strikes. That was no question, at least not
Speaker 1: in my recollection of d But he's also he's in
Speaker 1: charge of SpaceX and he's I mean, well, actually that's
Speaker 1: kind of worrisome. But he's a he's not in charge
Speaker 1: of the defense like the do O d SO he
Speaker 1: cannot actively do this with Doe. Yeah, I'm not. I'm
Speaker 1: not worried about Elon launching drum. I mean, maybe he
Speaker 1: will at some point, but that's not the point that
Speaker 1: I'm making. I'm I'm playing off of your concerns that like, yeah,
Speaker 1: Trump and Alon have immense influence power in terms of
Speaker 1: popularizing ideas that may otherwise not be palatable to the
Speaker 1: American people. And sometimes they're going to popularize ideas that
Speaker 1: are fucking catastrophic, and I think this is one of them.
Speaker 2: Well, they can popularize the idea.
Speaker 6: But again, I think Trump has been pretty good on
Speaker 6: uh not going to complete war. He dropped the mother
Speaker 6: like Mothervie bombs on basically an airport that wasn't really
Speaker 6: manned at all. I would put money that we don't
Speaker 6: see drone bombs domestically. But I like the idea.
Speaker 1: I think I think you're right. Like Odds wise, I
Speaker 1: agree with you. I don't think it's probable. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: as soon as you put that classification on these groups,
Speaker 1: it is now within the realm of possibility, and it
Speaker 1: was not before. So that's what I don't like.
Speaker 6: Well, he put the classification on him and then they
Speaker 6: still they didn't behave the way he wanted to, and
Speaker 6: then he tarish from Mexico and then they behaved a
Speaker 6: little bit. Now it's like his attack dog is telling
Speaker 6: you outright that like, oh, we can do Like he's
Speaker 6: just saying, we can do that, Yeah, we can do that.
Speaker 2: We can bomb you. It's it's another layer of threat,
Speaker 2: and it's like it could lease.
Speaker 1: Look, you might be right, it might be a teriff,
Speaker 1: a tariff threat to try and incentivize people to self deport.
Speaker 2: Like I see that.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, like, if you find so, what if
Speaker 1: it doesn't work, what if they don't so, then we.
Speaker 5: Got a then we got a drunk striker just fucking
Speaker 5: bomb them, dude. And it is the worst thing, do
Speaker 5: we we already like ripping a band aid off? Doesn't
Speaker 5: It feels like ripping a band aid off. It's gotta
Speaker 5: you gotta go through some pain before things get better.
Speaker 5: And it's gonna get real dark, and yeah, we're gonna
Speaker 5: blow up some buildings and there's gonna be some collateral
Speaker 5: damage and ship. But look, these people are in Colorado anyway.
Speaker 5: We don't really care about Colorado. Last time I checked, Uh,
Speaker 5: most of these places.
Speaker 2: Entire Dad's family lives in Colorado. Okay, all right, well,
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 5: Look, look, what is your what is your family doing
Speaker 5: in a place by the way that has a ship app,
Speaker 5: that has an app that tells you we're human feces?
Speaker 5: Is you said they're in San Francisco. Tell those people
Speaker 5: to move so that we can carpet Ndia place. In
Speaker 5: San Diego, there's there's minimal human shit. But the first
Speaker 5: time I saw human shit, I fled San Diego. So actually, shit,
Speaker 5: holmost dude shit in my front yard and I was like,
Speaker 5: I am selling, I'm out of here.
Speaker 2: He shipped in your in your front yard. That's well,
Speaker 2: I mean he might have really had to go.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he did, but that doesn't change the fact that, Like, so,
Speaker 1: I didn't know what to do. I just there was
Speaker 1: this human turd with a single napkin sitting on top
Speaker 1: of it because he had wiped once and then walked away.
Speaker 1: And I I called the cops because I was like,
Speaker 1: I don't know what to do, Like, can I prosecute?
Speaker 1: Can I do something to stop these almost from shitting
Speaker 1: in my yard? And they said there's nothing we can do,
Speaker 1: And I was like, Oh, if there's nothing you can
Speaker 1: do is homeless people just you know, violate my private property,
Speaker 1: I'm definitely leaving.
Speaker 5: I think we should be doing a mixture of multitudes
Speaker 5: of things, right, deporting them, bombing them, everything in between.
Speaker 5: And I think that should all be determined on how
Speaker 5: much human shit is there in an area at any
Speaker 5: given time. So if you have a place where there's
Speaker 5: virtually no human shit, well then somebody comes in and
Speaker 5: they deport them, and that's not a big deal. But
Speaker 5: if you live in a place where you have an
Speaker 5: app for human shit, carpet bomb is what happens, and
Speaker 5: that's you know, you should know better.
Speaker 2: Again, you've convinced me. I think this is a great idea.
Speaker 1: By the way, had they issued a letter of market
Speaker 1: reprisal to me right after I found the homeless dude shit,
Speaker 1: I would have hunted him first. That would have been cool,
Speaker 1: Like that would for sure, and it would have been
Speaker 1: constitutionally mandated because because like a week prior, my car
Speaker 1: had been broken into and my wallet had been stolen
Speaker 1: because I was in there, and I don't know if
Speaker 1: it was the same guy, but regardless, I would have
Speaker 1: hunted both of those homeless people down mercilessly like taken.
Speaker 2: Me and my wife.
Speaker 5: We went to New Orleans, which is a terrible place
Speaker 5: that I wouldn't recommend it, and we actually stepped in
Speaker 5: human shit in New Orleans, and so there's no shortage
Speaker 5: of it. And that's one of those examples where it's
Speaker 5: like if you're talking about a rural area with a
Speaker 5: small community that everybody gets together, everybody does their part,
Speaker 5: and then you're talking about New Orleans right where it's like,
Speaker 5: it's clearly a despicable place.
Speaker 2: It smells like shit, it looks like shit.
Speaker 5: I don't think that that's much of a I agree
Speaker 5: with what you're saying with the whole deportation thing, but
Speaker 5: I don't think we can look at every state the
Speaker 5: same way. Okay, so basically liberal states we bomb and
Speaker 5: the Republican states we do.
Speaker 6: Listen, I don't know. I don't think that's definitely how
Speaker 6: you get a civil war.
Speaker 1: But it's very unpopular and fairness, the liberals are all disarmed,
Speaker 1: so like, what are they gonna do.
Speaker 6: It's super unpopular to drop bombs on the United States.
Speaker 6: As the United States, It's happened before. I forget the
Speaker 6: talent I think in Chicago right then they bomb like
Speaker 6: a whole city street.
Speaker 1: I think it was Philly. It was black people. Yeah,
Speaker 1: sometimes sometimes.
Speaker 5: Because now Pensington Avenue is that is that what happened?
Speaker 5: It's a it's turned into a fananel alleyway essentially. I
Speaker 5: guess you never really recover with you get carpet bile.
Speaker 1: It was like thirty forty years ago. It was very
Speaker 1: I mean, it was buried, but it was a big story. Obviously,
Speaker 1: you don't like to have the government bombing people.
Speaker 5: So, I mean, among other things, we have this idea
Speaker 5: of them auditing the irs. And I asked you guys
Speaker 5: before if you could unpack a little bit of this
Speaker 5: for me, because I'm the politically retarded one of the show.
Speaker 5: So when I hear Elon Musk talking about auditing Fort
Speaker 5: Knox and they're talking about the lack of gold, or
Speaker 5: the perceived lack of gold in Fort Knox, where is
Speaker 5: this all going.
Speaker 1: Well, there has been an effort by you know, Ron
Speaker 1: Paul and others to try and audit Fort Knox for
Speaker 1: decades to prove out our gold holdings because despite the
Speaker 1: fact that we left the gold standard in seventy one,
Speaker 1: when the gold window was closed by Nixon, there was
Speaker 1: still this assumption that like, yeah, America still has reserves
Speaker 1: of precious metals, in particular an enormous stockpile of gold,
Speaker 1: and they have continued to claim that without any evidence
Speaker 1: or audit to demonstrate that that's fact actually accurate. So
Speaker 1: that's the reason that's the big deal is that if
Speaker 1: they don't have it, well, then the United States government,
Speaker 1: which is already thirty seven thirty eight trillion dollars in debt,
Speaker 1: does not have the assets that they're claiming either, which
Speaker 1: just continues to add to the evidence that we are
Speaker 1: defunct as a nation.
Speaker 2: So it would be bad, it would be very bad.
Speaker 2: That feels like it leads to dollar collapse.
Speaker 5: I mean, if we're really on the cusp of that
Speaker 5: already and the world then loses faith in the in
Speaker 5: the backing of the dollar when I was younger, it
Speaker 5: gets worse.
Speaker 1: It gets worse than that, because you add in the
Speaker 1: tariff you know, wars, the trade wars that were participating in.
Speaker 1: You add in the fact that we're essentially abandoning all
Speaker 1: of our NATO allies and telling them you deal with Ukraine,
Speaker 1: we're out. You will see lots of foreign governments pivoting
Speaker 1: to you know, other blocks of power and if they stop,
Speaker 1: and if they do that, then many of them will
Speaker 1: stop using the dollar as their primary trading currency in
Speaker 1: global trade, particularly Europe, because most countries would accept you know,
Speaker 1: European currency. That would add very, very much so to
Speaker 1: the flood of foreign US dollars that sit overseas, having
Speaker 1: them funnel back into America, in which case the inflation
Speaker 1: cycle picks up very rapidly and then you end up
Speaker 1: in a hyperinflationary period.
Speaker 2: So it's not without danger.
Speaker 6: So if you had to bet, Clint, what do you
Speaker 6: think we'll see? Like Elon is talking about live streaming
Speaker 6: the raid or the audit of Fort Knox, like if
Speaker 6: it because now I'm thinking you're one hundred percent right.
Speaker 6: It's it's so crazy, how like the dollar even though
Speaker 6: it's not it's no longer tied to gold at all,
Speaker 6: but the fact that there will be no gold in
Speaker 6: Fort Knox. What I was telling some of my wife
Speaker 6: when she asked about it, She's like, well, what does
Speaker 6: that do? And I was I said, all it does
Speaker 6: is like it's like a demoralization thing, Like if people
Speaker 6: don't see gold in there.
Speaker 2: They'll they'll lose their shit.
Speaker 6: But they don't understand the like they don't understand they
Speaker 6: were not even tied to it anymore. But the perception
Speaker 6: of us being tied to it is what holds up
Speaker 6: the perception of the money that is no longer tied
Speaker 6: to it. So exactly, it feels like a band aid
Speaker 6: rip off too, just like the whole whatever you do
Speaker 6: about the cartels, Like.
Speaker 1: You know what, now I'm on board because every time
Speaker 1: you use the ripping off a band aid metaphor, you convince.
Speaker 5: Me it's a good metaphor, Dude, it's a good button
Speaker 5: for it. Sometimes I just gotta you just got to
Speaker 5: rip off the band aid, dude. But the way that
Speaker 5: I'm thinking is, like, you know this is this could
Speaker 5: be to the detriment of this new administration. It's not
Speaker 5: necessarily I mean, obviously it's in the best interest of
Speaker 5: the country, uh to to rectify whatever's going on with
Speaker 5: our economy and our dollar. But it's not to the
Speaker 5: best interests of this new administration to immediately do something
Speaker 5: or unearth something that could cause the collapse of the dollar.
Speaker 1: I completely agree. But this, this is why I've I've
Speaker 1: been so as optimistic as I have been about you know,
Speaker 1: Trump round two is that it seems as if there
Speaker 1: are some there is some willingness to do things that
Speaker 1: will be temporarily painful for the benefit of the long
Speaker 1: term health of this country. Like deportations like that is
Speaker 1: not without consequence. You do you do port all these people,
Speaker 1: you end up applying additional wage pressures, like upward wage pressures,
Speaker 1: because now you have to get Americans to do these
Speaker 1: jobs because we're losing so many of our field workers
Speaker 1: and things that you know, illegals had been handling. Once
Speaker 1: you start to actually you know, pay real wages to
Speaker 1: the Americans that fill these roles, well, then the cost
Speaker 1: of those goods they increase. In those costs they transfer
Speaker 1: over to the consumer. That just adds to the inflationary
Speaker 1: feeling that we deal with. So like what I'm what
Speaker 1: I'm saying is that like that's just one very small
Speaker 1: example of actions that the Trump administration is taking that
Speaker 1: that will ultimately, you know, cause significant short term pain
Speaker 1: that he's just going to have to convince the American
Speaker 1: people that this is your medicine, this is your vegetables,
Speaker 1: Like you just have to eat them. So I think
Speaker 1: it's a good thing. But I will say if if
Speaker 1: Fort Knox is empty, which I don't think it will
Speaker 1: necessarily be empty, but I think it'll have a fraction
Speaker 1: of the holdings that it claims, yeah, you're right, top
Speaker 1: like fiat is obviously confetti anyways, it doesn't have any
Speaker 1: real value there, but the the value is exists as
Speaker 1: a consequence of belief. And if you just show people
Speaker 1: an empty vault, oh not a good look.
Speaker 6: The meme of Fort Knox like like you know, like
Speaker 6: people will say, my house is so safe, it's like
Speaker 6: Fort Knox. They don't even know what they're talking about,
Speaker 6: and they don't like it doesn't it doesn't even they
Speaker 6: don't even understand how it doesn't even apply to how
Speaker 6: we live, Like I haven't thought about Fort Knox in
Speaker 6: so long, But that would be a gut punch to America,
Speaker 6: and then how they behave after would be very interesting.
Speaker 6: So I don't think they can show us a completely
Speaker 6: empty Fort Knox. And I tweeted previously, I'm like, well,
Speaker 6: if we're gonna look at Fort Knox, why the fuck
Speaker 6: are we waiting so long? Like are we giving them
Speaker 6: time to put the gold back. I know that there's
Speaker 6: been shipping from the UK, but like, yeah, it's it.
Speaker 6: Wouldn't it be simple? Let's look at Fort Knox, open
Speaker 6: it up? Is it all here? Like we'd be able
Speaker 6: to tell if a lot was missing, right if we
Speaker 6: just looked in the vault?
Speaker 2: Oh why not?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, precious metals have dealt with uh counterfeits
Speaker 1: forever too, so you could have you could have painted
Speaker 1: uh what's it called tankston or whatever the fuck they
Speaker 1: call like tungsten there you go, just painted gold like
Speaker 1: gold plated tungsten. Like they could have taken it to
Speaker 1: that level potentially, But yeah, I think it's it's highly
Speaker 1: likely that it'll just have a fraction of the stockpile
Speaker 1: that's sitting there. And the reason that they don't want
Speaker 1: to do it is because they know that it would
Speaker 1: be bad for the dollar. Well yeah, and that and
Speaker 1: just bad for the reputation of the federal government too,
Speaker 1: which I've been buying XRP like crazy.
Speaker 6: And although I mean, listen, they might like they might
Speaker 6: just parlay or like switch into another kind of cryptocurrency,
Speaker 6: but I'm like, I like this one for where we're
Speaker 6: going with it. It seems like a government owned a government
Speaker 6: owned treasure. How would you call that security? And it
Speaker 6: has all the all the markings of something that they
Speaker 6: would want for a global, one world currency. So I'm like,
Speaker 6: let me, let me get buy this shit. If they
Speaker 6: showed you that there's no gold in Fort Knox, I
Speaker 6: think in this day and age, they would be able
Speaker 6: to just parlay oh z that Brian McKay from a
Speaker 6: part of the problems up are we get distracted here?
Speaker 6: I think that they be able to just slide right
Speaker 6: over into a nice cryptocurrency, which you know, Trump said
Speaker 6: we will We'll never do a CBDC. He'd pass the
Speaker 6: executive order about that. But it's like, what's the difference, really, Well,
Speaker 6: the dollars got.
Speaker 5: The effect of America is going to become the crypto
Speaker 5: capital of the world.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean all these things. I know that he's
Speaker 6: he's also trying to foster growth of cryptocurrency businesses in America.
Speaker 6: He's going to tax them like zero percent and then
Speaker 6: put heavier taxes on those operating outside of the United States,
Speaker 6: which is I like all these things, but what it
Speaker 6: seems like is we're ready to get rid of the dollar,
Speaker 6: the physical dollar, that we have, even though it's you know,
Speaker 6: it is garbage, but it's still the last semblance of
Speaker 6: Like I can take a couple hundred bucks and go
Speaker 6: somewhere and buy a gun or whatever I want, and
Speaker 6: no one has to know about it.
Speaker 2: No, the greatest thing.
Speaker 1: There is a real danger in getting rid of physical currency,
Speaker 1: and I think that in some ways though, you know,
Speaker 1: as you guys often say, it's inevitable, like it's just
Speaker 1: going to happen as the economy becomes more and more electronic. Anyways,
Speaker 1: like so much of what we do in commerce is
Speaker 1: through the internet. I think it is inevitable, but it
Speaker 1: is not without you know, real potential downsides and increasing
Speaker 1: state power, which is why it's so important to have,
Speaker 1: you know, the ripples and the bitcoins of the world
Speaker 1: that might offer a free market alternative to the centrally
Speaker 1: planned one. I like, I love that Trump is trying
Speaker 1: to be the the cryptocurrency president, but I think it's
Speaker 1: very important that people recognize that, like, his incentives are
Speaker 1: probably not going to be the same as your own. Like,
Speaker 1: he wants to be a successful president, he wants to
Speaker 1: maintain the nation. And there's also even if he has
Speaker 1: our best interest in mind, there's still vested interests that
Speaker 1: are surrounding him that very much would like to have
Speaker 1: whatever replaces the dollar. They want to own eighty to
Speaker 1: ninety to one hundred percent of it, you know, like
Speaker 1: they want to catch that windfall. So I'm just very
Speaker 1: nervous that he will not go with the best option.
Speaker 1: He will go with the best option for the people
Speaker 1: that surround him with money.
Speaker 2: Like Parlor instead of x which was the clear move.
Speaker 1: Great, great example, yep. Like that's the problem is that
Speaker 1: the incentives of the powerful don't align with the people
Speaker 1: very often, so they're going to try and maintain their
Speaker 1: you know, outsize power.
Speaker 6: The reason I say XARP looks like the move is
Speaker 6: because I was buying it since twenty sixteen twenty seventeen,
Speaker 6: and then I got out of it around twenty twenty,
Speaker 6: right around the end of Trump's administration, because the SEC
Speaker 6: was just after it and they were talking about like
Speaker 6: just tanking it completely, and I had a couple thousand
Speaker 6: in there, and at the time, I'm like, I can't
Speaker 6: just throw this money. It would have just been thrown away.
Speaker 6: They ended up taking it off of like coinbase and
Speaker 6: other chrymo places where you know, whatever you're calling it,
Speaker 6: where you can go buy chrysto exchanges, exchanges yet and
Speaker 6: I panicked, and I don't like to panic, So I
Speaker 6: ended up transferring my XRP to some other wallet and
Speaker 6: then I sold it all off and I put it
Speaker 6: in bitcoin and then obviously it's still around, but it
Speaker 6: went through a long lawsuit, and it's it's one of
Speaker 6: those things where like when they come out the other
Speaker 6: side of it, like they they're they're just being reamed
Speaker 6: out by the SEC. And they came out the other
Speaker 6: side and there's still a function in cryptocurrency, and I'm like,
Speaker 6: looking at them, I'm suspicious.
Speaker 2: It looks like trusted anymore.
Speaker 1: Yeah, look, I think that's the that's the problem is
Speaker 1: that the regulatory environment will give incentives to people that
Speaker 1: may be true believers, but like now they have so
Speaker 1: much of their net worth tied up in this project
Speaker 1: that they sell out. I mean, this is this happens
Speaker 1: all the time with these pump and dumb schemes of
Speaker 1: shit coins.
Speaker 2: Like all the time.
Speaker 1: It's like people that probably aren't the worst people in
Speaker 1: the world, well some of them are. Some of them
Speaker 1: are fucking absolute pieces of shit, but some of them aren't.
Speaker 1: And but they because of the game theory that exists
Speaker 1: with these these plays. It's like, well, if I don't rug,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get rugged. So I'm gonna rug. Like for
Speaker 1: those that don't know what that means, it just means
Speaker 1: that you sell and then everybody else with the expectation
Speaker 1: that you weren't going to and you just you know,
Speaker 1: plummet the price.
Speaker 5: If you look at the way this administration is kind
Speaker 5: of like, you know, there's an argument for them playing
Speaker 5: some sort of like long game. They're they're making a
Speaker 5: lot of plans, and I take very seriously when like
Speaker 5: Donald Trump will say something flippantly because it seems that
Speaker 5: he is working towards this thing. So when he says
Speaker 5: America is going to become the crypto currency capital of
Speaker 5: the world, and then they go and do a thing
Speaker 5: like you know, audit the irs and try to figure
Speaker 5: out if there's golden Fort Knox, and we just laid
Speaker 5: out that that could be detrimental to the administration, good
Speaker 5: for the people. It's a rough thing you got to
Speaker 5: go through, but ultimately it's good. I do kind of
Speaker 5: that resonates with me with top says this idea that
Speaker 5: maybe he's going to just sidestep into a crypto like
Speaker 5: XRP or something like that, because everything is kind of
Speaker 5: pointing to that. You know that this this he's I
Speaker 5: just don't think you do that without having a plan
Speaker 5: in place. In other words, you don't potentially shoot the
Speaker 5: American economy at like a dead dog or a dying dog,
Speaker 5: which may be.
Speaker 2: Necessary if you don't have a backup plan.
Speaker 6: No, you got to show your kids, like you gotta
Speaker 6: show like before we put our dog to sleep. I
Speaker 6: got to show the kids. I'm like, well, look at him.
Speaker 6: He's in bad shape. Yeah, barely walk and alley. And
Speaker 6: this is what they're doing in every aspect of the
Speaker 6: government or just America in general. I tweeted again to
Speaker 6: reference my own tweets because they're the best tweets. I said, what, like,
Speaker 6: what we're going through right now, what America is going through?
Speaker 6: The pain it feels like simultaneously, it feels like birth
Speaker 6: pains and death pains. It's just and maybe it is.
Speaker 6: Maybe it is a death pain going into a birth.
Speaker 6: I think that's what it is. But something is dying
Speaker 6: and something is being reborn, and it hurts.
Speaker 1: I totally agree. I think I think you nailed it,
Speaker 1: and I described it as the Trump Trump around two
Speaker 1: feels like an exorcism, Like it feels like like we
Speaker 1: are exercising demons.
Speaker 2: Like that's really what it feels.
Speaker 1: But just before I forget this point, the same game
Speaker 1: theory that I described where people rug other people when
Speaker 1: it comes to shit coins, that same game theory exists
Speaker 1: with every you know, quasi legitimate cryptocurrency like say bitcoin, ethereum, ripple.
Speaker 1: Like is that if you get in Trump's ear and
Speaker 1: you get him to make the reserve currency for the
Speaker 1: US dollar to be XRP, to be Bitcoin, to be whatever, like,
Speaker 1: you become instantly one of the richest people on the
Speaker 1: planet because you obviously the whole reason you're pursuing this
Speaker 1: is that you own a ton of ripple or Bitcoin
Speaker 1: or etheroeum or whatever. So everybody that's surrounding him is
Speaker 1: going to be giving him advice based off of their
Speaker 1: own benefit. And I just don't trust that he knows
Speaker 1: nearly enough to actually make the right decision. And honestly,
Speaker 1: as much as I know about finance and economics, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure that I know what the right answer is,
Speaker 1: so I definitely don't believe that Trump knows what the
Speaker 1: right answer is.
Speaker 2: So I think it's going to be very interesting to
Speaker 2: see how that plays out.
Speaker 6: It's not that it just comes down to Trump's decision,
Speaker 6: which I think that there is, but then my conspiracy
Speaker 6: brain starts going and it's like, well, Trump is making
Speaker 6: these decisions, or at least it looks like it. But
Speaker 6: I think a lot of this stuff has already been predecided,
Speaker 6: and the XRP thing looks like it's been predecided because
Speaker 6: you don't have these government entities that kind of take
Speaker 6: they take one uh crypto, they take one crypto hostage,
Speaker 6: and then it gets released. It's it's like it's like
Speaker 6: the fed shit, like like oh you got Like if
Speaker 6: you're if you're selling drugs and your friend got wrapped
Speaker 6: up by the police and then he's out on the
Speaker 6: street again selling drugs, you'd be like the fuck did
Speaker 6: you tell them?
Speaker 2: Like are you? And that's kind of what it feels like.
Speaker 2: It's called it's.
Speaker 1: Called flipping them to an informant exactly.
Speaker 6: Yeah, this cryptocurrency is an informant, but it also has
Speaker 6: the best technology that I'm aware of, or at least
Speaker 6: it was the best technology when they grabbed it and
Speaker 6: they started to you know, persecute these people for it's
Speaker 6: like an it's international trade. It works globally, and this
Speaker 6: is exactly what this type ofryptocurrency is for. So like
Speaker 6: I'm like, if they were to base the dollar or
Speaker 6: the American dollar on a cryptocurrency, this would be the one.
Speaker 6: And they've already set this the groundwork to using to
Speaker 6: saying that they're using this one, right, and for Trump
Speaker 6: to come and switch it, I don't know. I think
Speaker 6: that the game has already been set. I think the
Speaker 6: people who have the money have to who own this
Speaker 6: cryptocurrency already have it, and they're the people that are
Speaker 6: pulling the levers.
Speaker 2: And I watch some of it too, so we'll be
Speaker 2: all right.
Speaker 1: Well then let me say though, because I think that
Speaker 1: if you're going to make that argument that it's already
Speaker 1: been predetermined, that all of the financial players are already
Speaker 1: in that realm, well then bitcoin is the answer because
Speaker 1: the market cap reflects that the big players have already
Speaker 1: h you know, dove in much more than into that
Speaker 1: than any other cryptocurrency, so that that implies that would
Speaker 1: actually be the front runner, not Rippel.
Speaker 2: But bitcoin Bitcoin how many? How many?
Speaker 6: Just like regular retards have a lot of Bitcoin. I
Speaker 6: don't think they can have that. And I think when
Speaker 6: they when they grabbed XRP and they threatened that they
Speaker 6: were going to tank it, I think that they got
Speaker 6: rid of enough holders in x RP to grab major
Speaker 6: majority shares of this and whatever else we have, whatever
Speaker 6: else the people.
Speaker 2: Came back in on and bought.
Speaker 6: That's like, you know, they'll be rich people, sure, but
Speaker 6: they are not going to be in on the ground
Speaker 6: floor like Big Point. You know, you had a lot
Speaker 6: of regular people in on the ground floor on bitcoin
Speaker 6: and there's probably still majority holders.
Speaker 1: So interesting they can't have that. But like I said,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I just think that that if you're
Speaker 1: going to base it off of insider knowledge and the
Speaker 1: heavy hitters that exist within Wall Street already, like they
Speaker 1: have clearly showed their hand that they believe that bitcoin
Speaker 1: is the best play at this junction. But that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that you know, secretly they're not buying up XRP.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but it's you know it it'll be
Speaker 1: a player. BI Couling still be a major play. Sorry David,
Speaker 1: It will still be a major major player, but XRP.
Speaker 6: I think will be adopted in a big way as well,
Speaker 6: or something like it. Something like there's it's XRP. There's
Speaker 6: another one that they that they mentioned, Uh, it.
Speaker 2: Also starts with X.
Speaker 6: But there's like maybe three options that that like we
Speaker 6: can go with either way. And this is Yeah, the
Speaker 6: Fort Knox thing looks like we're ready to just slide
Speaker 6: right into that.
Speaker 2: It feels like it.
Speaker 1: And I think that like all of the all of
Speaker 1: the things that Trump's doing are very very perilous to
Speaker 1: the status quo of the neoliberal world order, which is
Speaker 1: really predicated off of like defense of the US dollar.
Speaker 1: And you know, even though I am as anti empire
Speaker 1: as you could get, as you know, I've spent decades
Speaker 1: just railing against our unconstitutional, the illegal, immoral wars, I
Speaker 1: still recognize that, like there is a very significant danger
Speaker 1: that everything that Trump's doing, if he really leaves the UN,
Speaker 1: if he really leaves NATO, that they just dumped the
Speaker 1: dollar and like we end up in fucking confetti hyperinflation,
Speaker 1: Like it could be really really bad.
Speaker 5: And it seems like he would have something in place.
Speaker 5: I mean, he's not a guy that he's so desperate for.
Speaker 5: Maybe it's different now that this is his second term,
Speaker 5: if he gets the eligibility for a third term, because
Speaker 5: I know they were wondering about an amendment to the
Speaker 5: twenty second I'm not long ago. I don't know whatever
Speaker 5: happened to that, but that would be good for us,
Speaker 5: because it seems that he cares quite a bit about
Speaker 5: being received well by the public. He cares about how
Speaker 5: people perceive him. I don't think that he would do
Speaker 5: something to our detriment without having sort of a backup plan.
Speaker 5: I'm not saying that makes him a savior or anything.
Speaker 5: I just think he's good at that sort of a thing.
Speaker 5: He's not going to rug bull or something like that,
Speaker 5: or he's not gonna because it would all hurt his
Speaker 5: public perception.
Speaker 2: And that seems to be like.
Speaker 1: You're right, and much of the way he functioned is
Speaker 1: based off of, you know, narcissism and ego and being
Speaker 1: loved by people. But this is all under the pretext
Speaker 1: or the assumption that he's actually on our side and
Speaker 1: that he's a good guy, you know, and which I
Speaker 1: doesn't think so, which which you you know. You vacillate
Speaker 1: between thinking that oh no, he's got a plan. And
Speaker 1: then also I don't I don't think he's a good guy,
Speaker 1: and I don't think he's on our side.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, like, if you're going to make this
Speaker 1: transition from the US dollar being the reserve currency to
Speaker 1: it not being that is like, I don't see how
Speaker 1: you manage that flawlessly, Like it's going to it's going
Speaker 1: to create major upheaval, and and just kind of like
Speaker 1: you can you can find a way to cushion it
Speaker 1: for those that have assets, because those that have assets
Speaker 1: can transition those assets into another currency or another uh,
Speaker 1: you know, just a physical item that will maintain its
Speaker 1: value whether it's in US dollars or it's in ripple
Speaker 1: or it's in bitcoin. But if you're poor and all
Speaker 1: these savings and all the money that you get paid
Speaker 1: is in US dollars, there is I don't know how
Speaker 1: you buffer those people at all. I don't I don't
Speaker 1: know how.
Speaker 5: I'm looking at his administration more like he's going to
Speaker 5: give us a lot of things that we want, things
Speaker 5: that are good for the country. We've we've allowed things
Speaker 5: to reach a critical mass where so many different aspects
Speaker 5: of our institutions are about to crumble in and end
Speaker 5: up burying this country, whether it's our financial or our
Speaker 5: medical or and uh, I think what's going to happen
Speaker 5: is he's going to rectify these things, and that's going
Speaker 5: to solidify him as the this heroic figure. I mean,
Speaker 5: if you look at what's going on with the medical
Speaker 5: industry right now, getting RFK in there, you want to
Speaker 5: talk about going through something painful, we might see something
Speaker 5: soon where it's revealed to us in so many ways
Speaker 5: that the pharmaceutical industries were levied against us so nefariously
Speaker 5: that it's almost unforgivable. Or you know, whatever happened during
Speaker 5: the lockdowns was even worse than the average conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 5: So if we get exposed to these things, let's like
Speaker 5: the food supply and all the various chemicals that are
Speaker 5: being put in there, and what they're actually doing to us,
Speaker 5: because we've known that these things are leveraged against us
Speaker 5: for some time, What the hell is that?
Speaker 2: I don't know?
Speaker 6: His phone for some reason continues to just play Alex
Speaker 6: Jones randomly. I thought he was going to change his
Speaker 6: ringer to toad breathing whatever happened to that. So if
Speaker 6: we do get exposed to the idea that all these
Speaker 6: chemicals in the food and all these pharmaceuticals that are
Speaker 6: you know, being pumped down our gullets or the lockdowns
Speaker 6: or this and that, that's going to be hugely disturbing
Speaker 6: and upsetting. It's going to be disturbing to the status quo.
Speaker 5: It's going to be upsetting to the individuals, you know,
Speaker 5: the average American civilian.
Speaker 2: And it does look like we're on the cusp of
Speaker 2: that too.
Speaker 5: So it's like this is all going to fall apart
Speaker 5: over here in some magnificent way. Uh, We're in this
Speaker 5: kind of season of revelation in many ways, you know.
Speaker 2: The everything is falling apart.
Speaker 6: And I think the way he's yeah, but he's it's
Speaker 6: a controlled demolition.
Speaker 2: Yes, what it's eleven shoutout nine to eleven.
Speaker 6: Shout up, Barack Obama, the controlled demolition of the American nation.
Speaker 1: Anyway, Now, when you say shot at nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: I just think about Lady Gaga a poker face. Yeah. So, uh,
Speaker 1: you got to see that video. It's a great video.
Speaker 6: But Donald Trump, uh, what he's doing with it's it's
Speaker 6: everything is pointing from from Fort Knox to ordering the
Speaker 6: I r S.
Speaker 2: To uh ad AD to leaving un to leaving NATO.
Speaker 6: Yeah, well, abolishing the inc tax is once. So you're
Speaker 6: going to abolish the income tax. You're yeah, you're taking
Speaker 6: all this money away from USAID, giving people back their money.
Speaker 6: It seems like we're being positioned for if you if
Speaker 6: you get rid of the I R S, the dollar.
Speaker 6: I just don't understand how you function with this dollar. Like,
Speaker 6: there's not going to be nothing, no governing body. He's
Speaker 6: going to get rid of the I r S. They're
Speaker 6: gonna end up giving us like five grand in cash.
Speaker 6: We're going to save some money on our income tax,
Speaker 6: and when people are nice and happy with their fake dollars,
Speaker 6: we're going to be able to buy into probably whatever
Speaker 6: cryptocurrency that.
Speaker 2: It's going to come and replace this dollar.
Speaker 1: If I would it feels like, yeah, if I was
Speaker 1: centrally planning the transition, I would do I would do
Speaker 1: all of the things that you're describing. So, like, I
Speaker 1: understand the argument you guys are making, and I think
Speaker 1: that you could find a way to cushion the blow.
Speaker 1: I just don't think you can find a way to
Speaker 1: you know, alleviate it entirely, right, But I think it
Speaker 1: is also ultimately a necessity. Like you're you're staring down
Speaker 1: the barrel of a trillion plus annual deficits just on interest,
Speaker 1: and then you also have two to four trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in deficits that we've been paying out because we just
Speaker 1: spend too much. So it's like, this is obviously not sustainable,
Speaker 1: So like, what are you going to do?
Speaker 5: You got to honestly, though, a lot of what we're
Speaker 5: doing here is we're talking about the things that worry us,
Speaker 5: what we should look at right now. And it doesn't
Speaker 5: mean you have to trust this administration at all. I
Speaker 5: don't trust this ministration. But what's fantastic is you have
Speaker 5: these pharmaceutical industries that are you know, potentially pitted against us.
Speaker 5: If they are the nature then is to keep us
Speaker 5: like sedated and dependent on this medical apparatus. You have
Speaker 5: the death throws of the legacy media, which is meant
Speaker 5: to keep us hypnotized and propagandas you have the revamping
Speaker 5: of not only the medical industry but also our health,
Speaker 5: our nutrition, our food systems. If that gets revamped in
Speaker 5: any meaningful way, then that's, you know, amazing. Also, our
Speaker 5: FIAT system keeps us effectively debt sleeves and that's about
Speaker 5: to potentially get revamped. We're looking at an unprecedented time
Speaker 5: in history where these things that are meant to keep
Speaker 5: us basically.
Speaker 2: Retarded are all about to fall apart.
Speaker 5: And so yeah, it's gonna be scary, but it's amazing
Speaker 5: because it's just like these things are imprisoning us in
Speaker 5: so many different ways, and we're going to be screaming
Speaker 5: as they tumble to the ground, or a lot of
Speaker 5: us are going to be writhing and screaming and freaking out.
Speaker 2: We just don't know what's good for us, though, I
Speaker 2: would say.
Speaker 1: Well, what's weird is that like us and our audience
Speaker 1: are like the people that are best equipped to deal
Speaker 1: with this, like all of the conspiracy theists, we actually
Speaker 1: kind of kind of understand what's happening, and I think
Speaker 1: most people are totally clueless.
Speaker 5: I just want to address this is Clint, but Eric
Speaker 5: s says a Hegelian dialectic, This is this is what
Speaker 5: I believe, you know that's surmised basically as as problem
Speaker 5: reaction solution. They create the problem, they wait for the
Speaker 5: public react, and then they give them the solution. I
Speaker 5: think this was an incredibly long game. You had to
Speaker 5: essentially destroy a country up until it was just a
Speaker 5: out to fall apart, and then slide and rescue it.
Speaker 2: I know for some people hearing that, it's like, who
Speaker 2: the fuck it orchestrates such a thing.
Speaker 5: That's a whole nother bag of worms. But that's very
Speaker 5: much the lens to Eric's point that I look at
Speaker 5: things through.
Speaker 1: I don't in this particular instance. I don't think that
Speaker 1: you can actually orchestrate this. There's too many players, like
Speaker 1: major players, that are at odds with one another. And
Speaker 1: I think that this is just a natural byproduct of
Speaker 1: a government that got extraordinarily large and bureaucratic, and it
Speaker 1: just falls apart because that's what extraordinary large bureaucratic institutions do.
Speaker 1: And then the solution is like inevitable answers that you
Speaker 1: have to come up with that. As I said earlier,
Speaker 1: I would be prescribing many of the things that the
Speaker 1: Trump administration is doing. So I think that my read
Speaker 1: of this is different from yours, and that I think
Speaker 1: that he's surrounded with people that have more of my
Speaker 1: worldview than the old guard did, and therefore he is
Speaker 1: implementing some of my ideas when it comes to how
Speaker 1: you might deal with this. Now, I could be totally wrong,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know.
Speaker 5: Well, the way I look at it is a lot
Speaker 5: of people will say that, and I'm not saying that
Speaker 5: that you're wrong, Clint, but a lot of people will
Speaker 5: look at various conspiracies and say, there's no way that
Speaker 5: anybody could have that many people be in on it
Speaker 5: and play.
Speaker 2: That long of a game.
Speaker 5: There's too many moving parts and too many conflicting personalities,
Speaker 5: and people just can't keep a secret.
Speaker 2: They locked down the entire world five years ago.
Speaker 5: And if you would have told me, well, if you
Speaker 5: would have told me that that was going to hapen,
Speaker 5: I would have said, yeah, I saw that in an
Speaker 5: episode of Jesse venturis conspiracy theory when I was nineteen.
Speaker 5: But if I didn't have that background, I would have said,
Speaker 5: no way, you can't orchestrate that many people just to
Speaker 5: fall in lops, you know, lockstep and shut down businesses
Speaker 5: and you know, let.
Speaker 2: Me, let me, let me just hop in.
Speaker 1: Because if you're right, and this is all problem reaction solution,
Speaker 1: I will grant that, like you would have to do
Speaker 1: something like what you're describing. You would have to have
Speaker 1: a lockdown, you would have to destroy mom and pop businesses,
Speaker 1: funnel all of the money to the best of interests.
Speaker 1: Like I understand why you calculate the way you do.
Speaker 1: I just I have not been convinced that that is
Speaker 1: actually why that happened. Now it's still a possibility, but
Speaker 1: I just I just don't know it for a fact.
Speaker 2: I will.
Speaker 6: I want to say this right now, the reason why
Speaker 6: this show is going to be bigger and better than
Speaker 6: shows like part of the problem is because.
Speaker 5: You're gonna say that with his producer watching Jack, I'm
Speaker 5: hoping he's still there, let him talking to him.
Speaker 6: But we had we had Robbie, Robbie on who's fifty
Speaker 6: percent of that show, and he did completely did not
Speaker 6: understand just how drastic of a time we were in. Now,
Speaker 6: whether it's a Hegelian dialectic and we're set up to
Speaker 6: be in this time, or whether these things happen as
Speaker 6: a result of government getting too big and things spiraling
Speaker 6: out of control and naturally like this is what we
Speaker 6: would get. Who's to say, like, this is why I think,
Speaker 6: this is why I'm here I'm in the middle. Dave's
Speaker 6: gonna go complete conspiracy. You're gonna say no, and I'm
Speaker 6: gonna say fucking Maybe I could see a little bit
Speaker 6: of both. But to be in this moment and not understand,
Speaker 6: like when I made the argument that maybe we shouldn't
Speaker 6: be allowing these people to vote, the next time I
Speaker 6: was making the argument that we are, Oh we are,
Speaker 6: he left Oh, he left us part of the problem. Sorry,
Speaker 6: sorry to hear that anyway. And you want to produce
Speaker 6: for our show, I'm never going to need a producer soon.
Speaker 6: To not understanding that you're at the at the level
Speaker 6: at this this point in America or this point in
Speaker 6: history where these decisions have to be made at such
Speaker 6: a level, I don't I don't know how you could
Speaker 6: do a show that is pushing the cultural narrative. You
Speaker 6: don't if you don't understand that like where we are.
Speaker 6: And then I was I was justified because just months
Speaker 6: later Trump comes in and he's doing these things that
Speaker 6: were unheard of. They were libertarians wet dream in some cases,
Speaker 6: although he's doing them with executive order and libertarians would
Speaker 6: like it to be more. I don't know, some other
Speaker 6: fucking way the point is he is he is moving
Speaker 6: at breakneck speed because he realizes the time, the time
Speaker 6: on the clock right now, and we're running out of time.
Speaker 2: And I realize that.
Speaker 6: So as a cultural commentator, how do you not look
Speaker 6: at this and go, we need huge action, and we
Speaker 6: need it now because America couldn't survive one more year
Speaker 6: of the Biden administration. Whoever really was running that administration
Speaker 6: it was. I don't know how much longer that would
Speaker 6: have been able, we would have been able to sustain
Speaker 6: that because I felt like we were rand today, were
Speaker 6: right there. This is the exact calculus I made. I mean,
Speaker 6: this is why I betrayed so many of my audience
Speaker 6: and I ended up I ended up voting for Trump
Speaker 6: despite having just ran for the vice presidency. The end
Speaker 6: of the Libertarian Party is that I was like, this
Speaker 6: is existential. Like I wasn't bullshitting, I wasn't like, I
Speaker 6: wasn't guessing, I wasn't trying to justify a decision that
Speaker 6: goes against my principles. I was like, no, no, no,
Speaker 6: this is perfectly in alignment with my principles. My principles
Speaker 6: are I don't want to be a slave, I don't
Speaker 6: want world War three. I don't want to watch the you.
Speaker 1: Know, the entire economy implode and people just in the
Speaker 1: streets trying to offend for themselves, Like I don't want
Speaker 1: to live in chaos. I don't want to have violence.
Speaker 1: This is perfectly in alignment with my values. And I
Speaker 1: saw the potential not a guarantee, but I saw the
Speaker 1: potential in Trump round two. That is what it is
Speaker 1: so far. And I never expected him to do all
Speaker 1: of this. I never expected him to do things that
Speaker 1: I agree with that he didn't even campaign on the
Speaker 1: USAID funding freeze, all that shit, like he is going
Speaker 1: above and beyond. But he is behaving in a way
Speaker 1: and his administration, even if you don't believe it's Trump,
Speaker 1: but just his administration is behaving in a way that
Speaker 1: they understand what time it is, in a way that
Speaker 1: the three of us do. And I can't believe it,
Speaker 1: Like I can't believe that this is actually happening. It's
Speaker 1: like like I now understand the magabases, you know, ride
Speaker 1: or die affinity for Trump. I don't understand why they
Speaker 1: had it in twenty sixteen, but I totally understand why
Speaker 1: they have it now, you know, Like I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't see why you thought he was your savior eight
Speaker 1: years ago. I can totally see why you would feel
Speaker 1: that way now, because he is doing things that have
Speaker 1: the potential to save this country.
Speaker 2: He really, he really is. It's just it's just interesting.
Speaker 2: It's he was talking.
Speaker 6: He was talking like this in twenty sixteen, and that's
Speaker 6: part of his appeal. This is a lot of what
Speaker 6: I really liked about him in twenty sixteen. But I
Speaker 6: think when he came in now, there's different modes of thinking.
Speaker 6: Right when he came in twenty sixteen, was he like
Speaker 6: too wet behind the ears and didn't really understand what
Speaker 6: he was doing? Or was it just that, like was
Speaker 6: the country wasn't there yet, we weren't ready for Like
Speaker 6: you said, it was existential that you went out and
Speaker 6: voted for him, at least supported vocally, supported to your
Speaker 6: two hundred thousand followers that this is the way we
Speaker 6: have to move if you want to have some semblance
Speaker 6: of a country going for just.
Speaker 1: If you just want a fighting chance. Man doesn't feel like.
Speaker 2: Now that I feel like a choice set up?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: It wasn't your choice, Clint, Right? Well, I mean that
Speaker 1: depends on your perspective. I still felt as if it
Speaker 1: was my choice. I mean, but like, what other choice
Speaker 1: did you have? It was it wasn't my choice choice,
Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: So Clinton and I come from two different points of views,
Speaker 5: but we come to the very similar conclusions, which is like,
Speaker 5: this is the best path going forward.
Speaker 2: But I look at that entire things as theater.
Speaker 5: I mean, the guy wrote the art of the comeback,
Speaker 5: and I think what we watched is like a magnificent
Speaker 5: comeback story. I don't think his I don't think he
Speaker 5: would have ever had as potent as a presidential run
Speaker 5: as he has now if it wasn't for the fact
Speaker 5: that he came, things were pretty good. But he took
Speaker 5: a bunch of arrows, and when he left, we got
Speaker 5: a walking corpse that tanked everything. And then to the
Speaker 5: extent that we were I mean, I was telling my
Speaker 5: wife from the day that he got out of office
Speaker 5: that he was going to be back in office and
Speaker 5: it was going to be a magnificent comeback. Not a
Speaker 5: political guy. Trump's not my favorite person. This is just
Speaker 5: the lens that I'm looking at things through. I say
Speaker 5: to myself, if you know, to paraphrase, Elon Musk. The
Speaker 5: most entertaining outcome is the likeliest outcome. I look at
Speaker 5: this as theater. If it's good theater, then this is
Speaker 5: what's going to happen.
Speaker 6: And here we are, so I think of theater. David,
Speaker 6: let's fucking change topics real quick. Not change topics really,
Speaker 6: but this is all on topic. We'll talk about the baby.
Speaker 1: What is that?
Speaker 2: That's not led, that's not.
Speaker 6: That's not it's not okay, unbelieved.
Speaker 2: I was going to compliment, he's got the moves, he's
Speaker 2: got some great moves.
Speaker 1: Green that such a great dick hold on, I got,
Speaker 1: I gotta, I gotta argue with David, just very briefly,
Speaker 1: because your your your premise is unfalsifiable because the right Yes,
Speaker 1: I understand that, but it's also unprovable. You can't because
Speaker 1: if Trump is genuinely an outsider, and he is not,
Speaker 1: you know, just playing the good script, that's most entertaining.
Speaker 1: Everything that the deep state has done to him is
Speaker 1: what you would expect from a genuine outsider.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So so like you can't read it and just go like, well,
Speaker 1: this is the hero's journey, so therefore it's concocted. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: this is what a hero's journey looks like. So every
Speaker 1: time you see a heroic you know, rise of power
Speaker 1: like that, it's it has to be scripted, Like, I don't.
Speaker 5: Know, this is what you would call, uh like free
Speaker 5: Masonic theater, left hand path versus right hand path. It's
Speaker 5: uh so within Hegelian dialectic, you create the problem and
Speaker 5: the solution. But what creates the problem a perceivable guy?
Speaker 5: What creates a solution a perceivable good guy. These are
Speaker 5: two puppets strapped to the hand of the same entity.
Speaker 5: And then you know to your point, Clint, about how
Speaker 5: it's unprovable and and you know it's built that way.
Speaker 5: I would agree with that, because then I would have
Speaker 5: to convince you that what owns the puppets is a
Speaker 5: spiritual entity, and that becomes a whole nother show called
Speaker 5: des Squad.
Speaker 2: There's it. Yes, you can watch that on Nefilim desk Squad.
Speaker 1: Ironically, I was the one that described the Trump Brown
Speaker 1: two as an exorcism.
Speaker 2: I know what I was tackled to hear you say that.
Speaker 2: It gave me a nice warm feeling in my heart.
Speaker 6: David's gonna say this shit now, added nauseum in every episode.
Speaker 5: But you know what you need to do, Clint. You
Speaker 5: just got to rip off the band aid. You got
Speaker 5: to rip the band aid off, and you got to
Speaker 5: come to God.
Speaker 1: All right, you know what, you know what you convinced me.
Speaker 1: I now believe in Christ.
Speaker 6: I found the code that cracked the code to get
Speaker 6: clintid analogy, I'll argue from Clint's side. So there is
Speaker 6: a there is like a protagonist, and there is an
Speaker 6: antagonist to this story. And just because all stories have
Speaker 6: a protagonists and an antagonist doesn't necessarily mean it has
Speaker 6: to be a story. Because like, human beings love stories
Speaker 6: so much that we emulate them in our everyday lives.
Speaker 6: So it's it's one of these things where it's like
Speaker 6: it looks like, yeah, it looks like k fabe. It
Speaker 6: looks like a great it is a great story.
Speaker 5: I mean, that's why Hogan gets on and he rips
Speaker 5: his shirt open, he goes vote for Trump.
Speaker 6: Brother, that's fucking it's k fabe or it's a human
Speaker 6: condition playing out a story, you know, just another same
Speaker 6: story that we've heard before.
Speaker 1: I lean towards the latter because you don't I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: you could, but I just find it very hard to
Speaker 1: believe that so many of Trump's in our circle were
Speaker 1: literally put in prison. You know, like, that's not k fabe,
Speaker 1: that's real. You know, that's that's I told you that
Speaker 1: there's a spiritual sacrifice. There's a spiritual implication to this.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to get into it, but.
Speaker 5: If if, if it is a spiritual implication, then there
Speaker 5: are spiritual rewards. In other words, so you know, going
Speaker 5: to prison in an immortal coil is not necessarily the
Speaker 5: end of the world, but there are questions that you
Speaker 5: then have to get saying.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, if you're going to be writing this
Speaker 1: script and these people are all playing along, that doesn't
Speaker 1: that doesn't come across as playing along.
Speaker 2: That comes across No, No, I don't think that sacrifice.
Speaker 2: It's it's compartmentalized.
Speaker 5: To the best of my knowledge, the way it looks
Speaker 5: is the higher up the you know, the ladder, the
Speaker 5: proverbial pyramid that you go, the more in the know
Speaker 5: the individuals are. And so some people are are moved
Speaker 5: in ways that you know, these people are experts at
Speaker 5: planting seeds in your mind and allowing you to believe
Speaker 5: they're your own ideas and then you go forth and
Speaker 5: you espouse them and you execute them. You just got
Speaker 5: to create the right scenarios and and and you know,
Speaker 5: engineer the right culture, which is the name of the game.
Speaker 5: They're constantly cultural engineering. It's the main job of these
Speaker 5: intelligence agencies. If you can create the right environment.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there we go. I mean we're looking at an
Speaker 2: actor right now. That is him. Yeah, this is him.
Speaker 6: But like what we're describing too, this is on like
Speaker 6: a very small level because this is just Ukraine. But
Speaker 6: this dude is the not just the leader of this country.
Speaker 6: Through the president of this country, he has led them
Speaker 6: into destitute, squalor, and death and now they're not even
Speaker 6: having election. I mean, this is completely set up and contrived.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's yeah, I agree on that one. This dude
Speaker 1: should have never seen It's insane presidency.
Speaker 2: It's insane. It's hard.
Speaker 6: It's hard to take it seriously or it's hard to
Speaker 6: not look at it as a as like a contrived
Speaker 6: thing when you have this guy leading a country and
Speaker 6: leading it in such a crazy way. Like I think
Speaker 6: he said something like Donald Trump said, uh, you should
Speaker 6: probably have elections, and he was like, the people don't
Speaker 6: they don't want that, Like they're good. I was like,
Speaker 6: I don't know what these people want, but you've been
Speaker 6: asing a war for four years now and you've lost
Speaker 6: an entire generation of young men. I'm sure that they
Speaker 6: would choose otherwise. And Russia has asked them as well,
Speaker 6: right to have a have an election before peace talks.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's a it's a requirement. Can I interject?
Speaker 5: I just want to address this real quick, intelligent counterspell says,
Speaker 5: I think we will see the destruction of the Democrat part.
Speaker 5: And this script is basically from the book Externalization of
Speaker 5: the Hierarchy by Alice Bailey. So I won't bore you
Speaker 5: with the details of that, but you know what's fascinating, Clint,
Speaker 5: is that Alice Bailey study the works of Helena Blovotsky,
Speaker 5: basically ocultest let's just call him a cultist, and they
Speaker 5: came to this idea that in twenty twenty five we
Speaker 5: would be entering a very specific age, something that they
Speaker 5: called the Golden Age, and that would happen in the
Speaker 5: year twenty twenty five. These are people that are studying
Speaker 5: the occult, the esoteric, these dark arts, and these are
Speaker 5: the conclusions that they're coming to Now. Donald Trump is
Speaker 5: on the world stage and he can't get the word
Speaker 5: Golden Age out of his mouth. So I mean, like
Speaker 5: I'm not saying, Clint, that that definitively proves anything, But
Speaker 5: what that does is it makes me suspend my disbelief
Speaker 5: and now look at this as is it potential reality,
Speaker 5: is it potential theater? You know, these things are now
Speaker 5: all things that I'm entertaining. So I'm not somebody that
Speaker 5: claims to have the answers one way or another. But
Speaker 5: when I see that kind of shit, when I see
Speaker 5: the Ingersol Lockwood book, when I see his uncle cleaning
Speaker 5: up Nikola Tesla's inventions, all that shit piles up to
Speaker 5: this really weird anecdotal pile of evidence that I can't ignore.
Speaker 5: It doesn't mean that I know what's up, but it
Speaker 5: does mean that I'm highly suspicious.
Speaker 1: I don't disagree that there's a lot of anecdotal evidence
Speaker 1: that is worth consideration. You know, I've never dismissed it
Speaker 1: out of hand. All I'm saying is that if you
Speaker 1: believe every time you see a hero's journey that's too
Speaker 1: good to be true, that it must not be true.
Speaker 1: It's like well, that's to discount the fact that there
Speaker 1: are genuine hero's journey that exists within the human experience,
Speaker 1: and I believe that, like there are moments where you know,
Speaker 1: the hero's journey plays out on a national scale. It happened,
Speaker 1: I think in the American Revolution, and I think that,
Speaker 1: like my read of things is more in alignment with
Speaker 1: like that's kind of what we're doing right now. We're
Speaker 1: kind of in a as of now, mostly peaceful American
Speaker 1: Revolution two point zero and a desperately needed one. Now
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that I'm right, Like these people could
Speaker 1: be nefarious players, and they could be leading us into
Speaker 1: something that's totally catastrophic and way worse than what we
Speaker 1: had prior. I don't know, but I'm going to do
Speaker 1: everything in my power to try and try and take
Speaker 1: that momentum that exists right now and just funnel it
Speaker 1: into something as positive as possible, because I feel like
Speaker 1: this is the first time we've had an opportunity to
Speaker 1: actually guide things in a positive direction ever, Like you've
Speaker 1: never had a time in really human history where just people,
Speaker 1: random people, you know, Mortgage guy gets to now genuinely
Speaker 1: have a voice in the entire ecosystem of you know
Speaker 1: what's happening and my voice is fucking real at this point.
Speaker 1: It's it's bizarre to me, but it's it exists, and
Speaker 1: you know, I go, I have tweets that get millions
Speaker 1: of views, like and I'm talking about like individual tweets
Speaker 1: that I'll do millions of views. One of them just yesterday,
Speaker 1: I was talking about leaving the UN and leaving NATO,
Speaker 1: and it's like, that's nuts. I mean that that will
Speaker 1: actually like it's a it's a fucking it's just a
Speaker 1: grain of sand, but it's a grain of sand on
Speaker 1: this scale of actually like the trajectory of where things go.
Speaker 5: It's fucking weird community to propagandize the people. Do you
Speaker 5: think they be in the recipient exactly? Exactly where do
Speaker 5: you where do you think they go if we leave NATO?
Speaker 5: Like what what?
Speaker 4: What?
Speaker 2: What folds from there?
Speaker 1: I think that they create a European Defensive Pact, uh
Speaker 1: that that exists without America. I think that it's it's
Speaker 1: obvious that you know the Article five, which there's a
Speaker 1: lot some dispute, but basically it requires that all NATO
Speaker 1: members either send troops or at least send you know,
Speaker 1: weaponry and aid to anybody that gets invaded by anybody
Speaker 1: that's not NATO. So I think that that that paradigm
Speaker 1: has been too perilous. That like, you can't have the
Speaker 1: largest military on Earth, the US basically being the defender
Speaker 1: of every country six thousand miles away in Europe, that
Speaker 1: if they have a boarder dispute with you know, Russia
Speaker 1: or China or whoever else, that it's like we now
Speaker 1: have to fucking go to World War three. Like that
Speaker 1: is It's just that's a paradigm that's too dangerous for
Speaker 1: humanity to exist, in my opinion.
Speaker 2: So I think that ends.
Speaker 1: I think that the NATO then rebrands, or maybe it
Speaker 1: just stays the same brand, but it just leaves just
Speaker 1: America's out of it. If this happens, which I'm not
Speaker 1: even assured that this will happen by any stretch, like
Speaker 1: it probably won't, but if it does, I think that
Speaker 1: that would be good. Like we need to have different blocks.
Speaker 1: That I think that the Bricks block had only been
Speaker 1: growing because of the NATO block. If NATO diminishes its power,
Speaker 1: I think that the impetus to have additional members of
Speaker 1: Bricks starts to diminish too. It seems as if what
Speaker 1: Trump is doing is he's trying to strengthen the dollar
Speaker 1: by taking the threat metric or the threat calculus down
Speaker 1: for the bricks nations by exiting NATO, by which they
Speaker 1: will no longer be divesting of the US dollar, which
Speaker 1: will maintain the US dollar as a reserve currency. That's
Speaker 1: that's like, that's the analysis that from my Austrian economics understanding,
Speaker 1: I think that's what's happening.
Speaker 2: I did that make sense? You want to make sure
Speaker 2: that makes sense.
Speaker 5: It's difficult for me to grasp because I'm retarded, But
Speaker 5: well that's why. Yeah, no, no, So I'm gonna ask
Speaker 5: some more questions here because I genuinely don't know and
Speaker 5: at risk of exposing myself as completely unaware. Would this
Speaker 5: have any effect if we did pull out of NATO
Speaker 5: on our relationship with Israel?
Speaker 2: Or is that not related whatsoever? I mean, Israel's not
Speaker 2: in NATO, so not really.
Speaker 5: Just because I'm looking at the way that this this
Speaker 5: cultural conversation is going around the Jews, and I'm expecting
Speaker 5: it to become a.
Speaker 6: Part of this We're in the part of the episode
Speaker 6: we were deciding, like she'll be talking about were going
Speaker 6: to Yeah, we're going to segment the shows.
Speaker 5: You know what I decided, top, I decided it's best
Speaker 5: to rip the band aid off and just talk about
Speaker 5: the Jews. So what's happening right now is there's a
Speaker 5: lot of anti jewe sentiment. And I've gotten to the
Speaker 5: point now where I used to partake in it because
Speaker 5: it was a lot of fun, but now I'm realizing
Speaker 5: anti well this is quite a bit.
Speaker 2: Actually, if you're paying attention, Oh okay, there you go.
Speaker 5: Okay, okay, I can't yeah, interesting shout out to So
Speaker 5: so I'm expecting for this to come into play at
Speaker 5: some point, and I think that that's that we when
Speaker 5: we did our last episode.
Speaker 2: Was that before the Super Bowl? I don't remember.
Speaker 1: I kind of think that it was right after. I
Speaker 1: thought I could be wrong.
Speaker 2: Well either way.
Speaker 5: You know, you had Kanye West pulling his big publicity
Speaker 5: stunt when it came to dropping all the merch off
Speaker 5: of his website and just having a white T shirt
Speaker 5: with a swastika on it. And you know, so much
Speaker 5: of like anti Israel rhetoric is really reaching critical mass.
Speaker 5: So much of the jew noticing is reaching critical mass.
Speaker 5: And I'm sitting back looking at this wondering how this
Speaker 5: is going to play with with I guess, you know, geopolitics.
Speaker 5: As as this all moves forward, I kind of have
Speaker 5: a feeling that we're going to see a big pivot
Speaker 5: because I don't think that you have this cultural conversation
Speaker 5: and everything reaching a boiling point and then it just
Speaker 5: goes away.
Speaker 2: I don't see this just going away. So that's kind
Speaker 2: of like a while card in this whole story.
Speaker 1: Well, yes, and it always is, and it has been
Speaker 1: the wild card in our foreign policy, you know, negotiations
Speaker 1: for as long as I've been alive. So I don't
Speaker 1: know how that's going to play out. I think that
Speaker 1: the the gods and negotiations are so interesting for that
Speaker 1: exact reason is that, like it's obvious that there's a
Speaker 1: huge percentage of Trump's base that is genuinely America first
Speaker 1: and does not want to put you know, Israel first.
Speaker 1: And I think that that that clash is playing out
Speaker 1: in a way that like he now has a base,
Speaker 1: and I don't think it's a small one, you know,
Speaker 1: I think I don't know, I don't think it's half,
Speaker 1: but I think it's like a good chunk of his base.
Speaker 1: It's like, look, we are serious about this, like we
Speaker 1: want like our country is thirty seven trillion dollars in debt.
Speaker 1: We cannot put anybody before us. Nobody, even if they have,
Speaker 1: you know, broadly good feelings about Jewish people and about Israel,
Speaker 1: They're still like, yo, what are we doing? This is
Speaker 1: fucking suicidal.
Speaker 2: This is crazy.
Speaker 1: So that's the reason that I was I didn't freak
Speaker 1: out as much as some people in my camp when
Speaker 1: it came to his owning Gaza thing is because I
Speaker 1: was like, well, this does seem like a very interesting pivot,
Speaker 1: like one that is not not in alignment with the
Speaker 1: Greater Israel project. And you know, net and Yah who's
Speaker 1: ends but to who Clint, Who's who?
Speaker 5: Is?
Speaker 2: They though?
Speaker 1: So so like, but then net Yahoo pivots and he
Speaker 1: may be doing it to save face. So I can't
Speaker 1: really read this properly either. But he's saying I love
Speaker 1: Trump's idea, Yes, the US ought to own Gaza, and
Speaker 1: it's like, but but my point is is like this
Speaker 1: is a lot of face saving maneuvers. So like Trump
Speaker 1: may actually be doing something that net Yahuo doesn't like.
Speaker 1: But then you get into fucking five d chess and
Speaker 1: you just sound like you're sucking Trump's dick.
Speaker 2: And it's like, yeah, true, and.
Speaker 1: And and I don't, So I don't. Basically, I'm just
Speaker 1: trying to be very honest that I don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't know if he's just totally in lockstep to the
Speaker 1: Atolsen's of the world, or if he is trying to
Speaker 1: be a real boy and cut his puppet strings.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 6: Well, Clint, we're running up on time here. But speaking
Speaker 6: of sucking dick, I really want to know what you
Speaker 6: know about Obama's birth certificates.
Speaker 2: You came in hot. You're like, I woke up very sleepy,
Speaker 2: but I watched an hour of this some kind of
Speaker 2: meeting I'm meeting. I can't believe this is back on
Speaker 2: the table. I mean, that's what it feels like.
Speaker 5: Everything is going to come back on the table and
Speaker 5: we're gonna get some rectification. I think I made that
Speaker 5: word up, but we're gonna get it when it comes
Speaker 5: to these topics that have been like, you know, speculated
Speaker 5: on heavily but put to get to bed for the
Speaker 5: past decade.
Speaker 2: What do you think, Clint, dude?
Speaker 1: All Right, So Joe Rpio, the sheriff of Arizona or
Speaker 1: whatever Maricopa County. I think he comes out with his
Speaker 1: press conference. I don't actually know what it happened, like,
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is last year or if
Speaker 1: it just happened yesterday. I tweeted it out, But yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, so I said, just watch the full hour
Speaker 1: plus Arizona press conference. Seems pretty evident that Obama's birth
Speaker 1: certificate was in ded a forgery. I can only assume
Speaker 1: the why. The obvious answer would be that he wasn't
Speaker 1: a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency.
Speaker 1: Am I taking crazy pills? Or is this actually happening?
Speaker 1: Was a foreigner actually the president for eight years honestly
Speaker 1: asking this is nuts? And then I posted I linked
Speaker 1: to the actual press conference. But it's seventy minutes of
Speaker 1: them just painstakingly proving out that Obama's birth certificate was forged.
Speaker 2: Like how are they doing it?
Speaker 5: Are they looking at it on like a photoshop basis,
Speaker 5: Like there's some inconsistencies in fonts or images on the
Speaker 5: birth certificate.
Speaker 1: So in twenty eleven, the White House actually, because of
Speaker 1: all of the controversy, the White House published a PDF
Speaker 1: of his birth certificate, so they are using that and
Speaker 1: they are demolishing it. And what they found was that
Speaker 1: there is another birth certificate from I guess, you know,
Speaker 1: Hawaii that has a different person's name that was used
Speaker 1: as the template by which it was manipulated and then
Speaker 1: became Obama's birth certificate. So I think I'm like, I'm
Speaker 1: ninety five percent convinced that, like his vers Pirth certificate,
Speaker 1: was a forgery.
Speaker 5: That's exactly what conspiracy theorists were saying all those years ago.
Speaker 5: It was a forgery, but that it was specifically like
Speaker 5: somebody else's birth certificate.
Speaker 6: Why not just conspiracy theorists, but the conspiracy theorist, the
Speaker 6: guy that's sitting in the White House right now. Yeah, dude,
Speaker 6: that's the only reason he ran for president. It's like
Speaker 6: full circle.
Speaker 2: It is nuts.
Speaker 1: Well, but here's the here's the thing that that adds
Speaker 1: additional credence to this. This theory wasn't popularized. I mean
Speaker 1: maybe it was popularized by Trump. It didn't originate from Trump.
Speaker 1: It originated from Hillary fucking Clinton high campaign. That yes,
Speaker 1: her campaign was responsible for popularizing this initially because they
Speaker 1: were trying to destroy Barack Obama because she was the
Speaker 1: heir apparent to the throne.
Speaker 5: Listen to me, black guy, there's not enough babies going
Speaker 5: around for everybody to drink.
Speaker 2: I gotta get rid of.
Speaker 1: So all I'm saying is it's it's not without merit.
Speaker 1: Like I'm not saying it's definitive, but it's not without
Speaker 1: merit because this was this was essentially oppo research, opposition
Speaker 1: research that was ran by the Clinton campaign. I think
Speaker 1: it was probably legit, and I think that they they
Speaker 1: doctored a birth certificate to try and to try and
Speaker 1: assuage people's concerns about it. But I think that like
Speaker 1: they doctored it.
Speaker 5: All of this, dude, is like Operation Rude Awakening, Like, hey,
Speaker 5: guess what the Obama was running the country through the
Speaker 5: Biden administration, through the Obama administration, not a legitimate president whatsoever. Hey,
Speaker 5: by the way, all the medical apparatus and the food,
Speaker 5: it's all been poisonous entire time.
Speaker 2: They're trying to kill you.
Speaker 5: The lockdowns were bad, and there was never really anything
Speaker 5: to be worried about in the first place, and the
Speaker 5: inoculations were actually killing you.
Speaker 2: They're just fucking on a tailor, like everything.
Speaker 6: By the way in the last four years were run
Speaker 6: by a guy in a diaper, but really run by
Speaker 6: a guy that his birth certificate was fake.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, and then Alex Bearnson comes out yesterday confirming studies
Speaker 1: that prove that people are getting AIDS from the vaccine,
Speaker 1: that they're credible that they have what's called T cell exhaustion,
Speaker 1: which means that essentially it's the exact same outcome of
Speaker 1: someone that's HIV positive, that they.
Speaker 2: Have vaccine induced AIDS.
Speaker 5: That's what I literally was saying that and getting censored
Speaker 5: on all these meta companies right Facebook and Instagram were
Speaker 5: taking down my post when I was saying this, yep,
Speaker 5: which means another band aid. The American public are going
Speaker 5: to bleed out.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, that's my concern. But I mean, if this
Speaker 1: is accurate, then that means that the the as he
Speaker 1: says here, the spike levels continue to increase over time.
Speaker 1: Like the entire framework of the MR and A vaccine
Speaker 1: was that you were going to have to create these
Speaker 1: kind of factories of spike protein, but you're only supposed
Speaker 1: to do it for a limited amount of time because
Speaker 1: the spike protein is toxic. If you actually create these
Speaker 1: spike protein factories and they function in perpetuity and they
Speaker 1: continue for years. Well then yeah, you now have AIDS. Now,
Speaker 1: let me just add it was it was Anthony Fauci
Speaker 1: that many people believe was beyond behind the first AIDS
Speaker 1: epidemic of the nineteen eighty So that could think about
Speaker 1: that that Anthony Fauci is now responsible for not one
Speaker 1: but two American well global AIDS epidemics.
Speaker 2: It's fucking nuts. Yeah.
Speaker 6: Well, Montana, it seems like this is a couple of
Speaker 6: days ago, uh scheduled to hold a hearing to ban
Speaker 6: mRNA vaccines, which is gonna be interesting because, uh, the
Speaker 6: Donald's Rum administration came in hot with a five hundred
Speaker 6: billion for AI specifically mRNA AI vaccines to cure cancer
Speaker 6: or something. So there's there's gonna be They're gonna be
Speaker 6: at odds. And this is one of Donald Trump's main
Speaker 6: failures as the president in twenty sixteen to twenty twenty.
Speaker 6: Was the main Yeah, yes, I mean besides like the
Speaker 6: you know, the printing of the money, and there's a
Speaker 6: couple of other things.
Speaker 1: Uh, nothing comes close to the lockdowns in my opinion.
Speaker 6: But yeah, but sorry, I can't. I can't blame him
Speaker 6: for the lockdowns. These were states acting and he what
Speaker 6: he could have done was what he should have done,
Speaker 6: and what he's doing now where he's like he just
Speaker 6: went into New York and he was like, yeah, you're
Speaker 6: congestion pricing. That's gonna stop. And they're complaining and their
Speaker 6: virtue signaling athy would do what they want, but in
Speaker 6: the end of the day, they're going to come down
Speaker 6: there and shut it down. But his main failure was
Speaker 6: the promotion of the vaccines. And he came in promoting
Speaker 6: another vaccine, and now we have individual states that are
Speaker 6: going to ban this specific type. And this is the
Speaker 6: thing that worries me too, Like, uh, we just had
Speaker 6: a guest on what was her name, Alexandra Alexandra, Yeah,
Speaker 6: from just and she's, you know, very much in the
Speaker 6: field of what RFK Junior is doing talking about vaccines,
Speaker 6: children and health in general. But what I'm worried about
Speaker 6: is like, I don't give my kids any vaccines anymore.
Speaker 6: But I'm like, part of my brain is like, what
Speaker 6: if these are Like what if one of these is okay?
Speaker 6: Like what if these do help?
Speaker 2: And I think what if he toss the baby out
Speaker 2: with the bathwater.
Speaker 6: Yeah, it's like, there's so much good shit, you know,
Speaker 6: and there's so much there's so much bad shit, but
Speaker 6: there could be something there that's helpful, and now I
Speaker 6: have to throw all of it out. And the mRNA
Speaker 6: vaccine is one of these things, like it could be.
Speaker 6: It looks like a good technology.
Speaker 5: But right because he's doing Project Stargate five hundred billion
Speaker 5: dollars to a combination of m RNA vaccinations and AI,
Speaker 5: I don't even understand how that works. And I'm I
Speaker 5: look at that and I pull back real hard because
Speaker 5: at the very least, it's tone deaf. We just got
Speaker 5: off the lockdowns. What do you mean, David, It's it's
Speaker 5: tone deaf.
Speaker 2: But it could work. It looks like a good technology,
Speaker 2: and I don't fucking want it. Well, I don't want
Speaker 2: to hear about it, but it could actually work.
Speaker 1: So it's like, yeah, well, I mean, this is my
Speaker 1: concern too, is that, you know, I think that mRNA
Speaker 1: tech has the potential. It doesn't exist now, but it
Speaker 1: has the potential to cure cancers and do all sorts
Speaker 1: of fucking miraculous shit that like would really benefit humanity.
Speaker 1: But its initial rollout was so catastrophic and so lethal
Speaker 1: that no one should trust it. I think billions of
Speaker 1: people will trust it regardless because they're fucking insane. But
Speaker 1: I agree with you that, Like, yeah, I'm not this
Speaker 1: is why I'm not. Really I'm not interested in the band,
Speaker 1: But I'm also I'm most upset because you mandated it.
Speaker 2: Like that's the problem. And like, if if I have.
Speaker 1: To choose between an outright ban or a mandate, well
Speaker 1: then I'm going ban all day. You can't fucking force
Speaker 1: the shit on me. But the obvious, like proper answer
Speaker 1: would be, well, this shit should have never been mandated,
Speaker 1: and it should have been tested thoroughly, and it should
Speaker 1: have been evolving slowly so that you can actually produce
Speaker 1: a product that is safe and effective. You didn't, your cunts,
Speaker 1: and now we hate you, and now you all ought
Speaker 1: to be in prison.
Speaker 6: So that's where we're Yeah, but look at humanity now,
Speaker 6: because this thing could again, it could it could very
Speaker 6: well bring about the mark of the beast, which is
Speaker 6: it's a genuine concern of mine, but it could also
Speaker 6: like it could help if you if you actually had
Speaker 6: One of the things that we talk about is a
Speaker 6: mental illness and they're giving you lithium to balance it.
Speaker 6: You have an imbalance of chemicals in your brain. It's like,
Speaker 6: number one, we've never measured the chemicals. Number two, where
Speaker 6: are we putting the chemicals and how are you balancing them? Well,
Speaker 6: if you have an AI that's that's put in, put
Speaker 6: into some sort of mRNA vaccine technology that can go
Speaker 6: in and diagnose this stuff. And let's say that the
Speaker 6: imbalance of chemicals is a legitimate thing, and we can
Speaker 6: balance the chemicals.
Speaker 2: Or whatever is wrong with you.
Speaker 6: We can go and figure this out and it can
Speaker 6: be tailored to exactly what you need. It's a great
Speaker 6: it's a great technology. It'll be paired of course with
Speaker 6: you know, the sigil of Satan and the mark of
Speaker 6: the beast. That's one thing this is a problem. But
Speaker 6: for everybody else that just has common sense from the
Speaker 6: last four years, you're gonna say absolutely not, don't.
Speaker 2: Touch me with that stuff. And it could help. It
Speaker 2: might be okay, but I will genuinely never know.
Speaker 6: I'll die die of cancer probably because I'm not getting
Speaker 6: that thing, even though it could possibly help.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, this is why it should have just
Speaker 1: always been left to consumers free will that like, if
Speaker 1: you're if you're in a position of like, for instance,
Speaker 1: if you have stage three four cancer, and you have
Speaker 1: the chance to try this shit out, well you don't
Speaker 1: have much to lose, so.
Speaker 5: Go for it. Yeah, but here, here's here's the rest
Speaker 5: that rewrites a DNA and you can't get into the
Speaker 5: Kingdom of Heaven.
Speaker 1: Well all right, so I wasn't going to go that part,
Speaker 1: but I will say there is a real concern about
Speaker 1: it rewriting DNA, and that like we will never be
Speaker 1: the people that we were before twenty twenty one. And
Speaker 1: that's a real distinct possibility. Like that may be true
Speaker 1: that because you've now manipulated the DNA of like mothers,
Speaker 1: for instance, that they're now producing children whose DNA has
Speaker 1: been altered, and therefore, because their DNA is altered, every
Speaker 1: one of their offspring forevermore will also be altered. And
Speaker 1: we don't understand the long term consequences, you know, in
Speaker 1: totality at this point, like we don't know how we
Speaker 1: altered humanity's path. And I just think that of all
Speaker 1: the things that any evil dictator or whatever has ever
Speaker 1: done in human history, it pales in comparison to what
Speaker 1: these scientists did to us. I mean, it is the
Speaker 1: It is the most egregious and most evil action I
Speaker 1: have ever witnessed, and I lived through it, and I
Speaker 1: feel like no one cares, and that is unbelievable to me.
Speaker 2: Shut your mouth and trust the science. Yeah, yeah, shut
Speaker 2: your mouth. Obey.
Speaker 6: This is why I say I close out every episode
Speaker 6: of Nephel Desk when I think we should close out
Speaker 6: this one here. But I always say, don't forget to obey, submit,
Speaker 6: and comply. I've been saying it for man since at
Speaker 6: least twenty twenty. I've been saying it since before COVID.
Speaker 6: I had like a line of clothes that say obey, submit, comply,
Speaker 6: and it's still they hold true. Now that's that's top lobster.
Speaker 6: I thought, obey, thanks, I'll dare you, no, just obey
Speaker 6: it probably no, Well, Obey is a I know he's
Speaker 6: a street artist, but obey, submit and comply, like, don't
Speaker 6: ask questions, listen and do what you're fucking told. And
Speaker 6: you can live that way, or you can think for
Speaker 6: yourself and be a dangerous retard. Intro to liberty lockdown,
Speaker 6: just just scan your barcode you know, along the same lines. Yeah,
Speaker 6: and that was long before vaccine passports or anything like
Speaker 6: that was really being thought of. But I was like, yeah,
Speaker 6: that's the lyric. Wow, we're the best, aren't we great?
Speaker 2: Guys? Aren't we great?
Speaker 6: In the chat, thank you for showing up again to
Speaker 6: another episode of Dangerous. We hope to do this live,
Speaker 6: like in person pretty soon soon. So uh, we're gonna
Speaker 6: be setting up ways for you to give us money
Speaker 6: to do that. But actually, yeah, this has been.
Speaker 1: I would like to get our audience to uh really
Speaker 1: try and apply pressure as much as possible to Chris
Speaker 1: Pavlovsky because I think that if they if they genuinely
Speaker 1: believe that this my voice sounds great, all of a
Speaker 1: sudden as soon as they cost like the sound great.
Speaker 1: If if we can get Chris to believe that this
Speaker 1: would be a viable show for Rumble, which I think
Speaker 1: it is. I think it is perfectly fitted or suited
Speaker 1: to Rumble. If we do it in person every week,
Speaker 1: I think it would be one of their most successful shows.
Speaker 1: But we need to get them to sign us so
Speaker 1: that we can actually have some fucking financial assurances by
Speaker 1: which we can all move and be near each other
Speaker 1: to do it in person. So uh yeah, if you
Speaker 1: guys don't mind, you know, just tweet Chris say sign
Speaker 1: dangerous Retards.
Speaker 5: Just say it over and over again, just say we
Speaker 5: love dangerous retards. We love dangerous retards. Also, guys, don't
Speaker 5: forget all of our socials are up and running. So
Speaker 5: if you enjoyed this, consider going over to YouTube, Rumble, Odyssey,
Speaker 5: your audio platforms and subscribing to Dangerous Retards.
Speaker 2: That's r D.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to have them clarify because if they
Speaker 1: just say I love dangerous Retards, Chris is gonna be
Speaker 1: like me too.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know what I mean.
Speaker 5: I just want it to be confused and upset is
Speaker 5: what I wanted. But please tell Chris pavlatskitus to sign us.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and well we have a new producer too, So
Speaker 6: thanks guys. All right, we'll see you probably next week
Speaker 6: or something like that.
Speaker 2: Peace out peace.
Speaker 1: Just a reminder that you can find Dangerous rt rds
Speaker 1: on YouTube, Rumble, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, everywhere you find your shows.
Speaker 1: Make sure you guys subscribe to that. And yeah, I'll
Speaker 1: stop double feeding you if you're already subscribed over there.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you, and I will see you probably tomorrow
Speaker 1: two days from now at Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 2: See you guys, so