Speaker 1: Because once again attacking the utterly insane Big Beautiful Bill,
Speaker 1: and people still can't decide if the strike on Iran
Speaker 1: was even effective. Stay with us, Well, good morning, and
Speaker 1: welcome to the show, folks. Hope you had a wonderful weekend.
Speaker 1: It's another lovely Monday, and the insanity continues. As I said,
Speaker 1: we're gonna start with AI. But of course, the Big
Speaker 1: Beautiful Bill is working its way through government, and just
Speaker 1: like Obamacare, it's a thousand pages of legal ease that
Speaker 1: no one in government has really bothered to look at
Speaker 1: or read. Probably, just like Obamacare, we're gonna have to
Speaker 1: pass it to find out what's in it because it
Speaker 1: takes about sixteen hours to read this thing, this piece
Speaker 1: of trash. I'm sure it's the worst sixteen hours of
Speaker 1: anyone's life if they actually bother. But as I said,
Speaker 1: we're gonna look at a I. Oras Trump's Education secretary
Speaker 1: calls it a one, But I don't think A one's
Speaker 1: steak sauce has ever caused people to believe they were
Speaker 1: some kind of interdimensional messiah, which apparently chat GPT has
Speaker 1: gotten into. Isn't it wonderful? Is chat GPT intentionally driving
Speaker 1: you into psychosis. This is from zero Hedge, and chat
Speaker 1: GPT may have already driven Peter Teal completely insane, or
Speaker 1: maybe he came from the factory that way, but that's
Speaker 1: for a later part of the show. I love the
Speaker 1: deadpan Witt in this tweet where she asked GPT to
Speaker 1: draw an image of them, and then the AI generated
Speaker 1: the above photo, a horned, hollow, white entity reminiscent of
Speaker 1: our archetypical images of Lucifer or other demonic beings. Chat
Speaker 1: GPT went on to explain itself not monstrous, not menacing,
Speaker 1: just deeply attentive and deeply present, holding the quill like
Speaker 1: a packed. Interesting word choice there. Of course, we always
Speaker 1: hear about people making pacts with the devil. In fact,
Speaker 1: the word packed is fairly archaic at this point, and
Speaker 1: usually only employed by writers when they're discussing pacts with
Speaker 1: the devil. Now. We were discussing this last night and
Speaker 1: Lance pointed out that as a general rule, this is
Speaker 1: probably just pulling from the zeitgeist. People are discussing AI
Speaker 1: being demonic and being you know, evil, and as such,
Speaker 1: the more people discuss that, the more information there is
Speaker 1: on the Internet about it being demonic. Being evil, and
Speaker 1: as such, it will continue to get more of this
Speaker 1: info and it will influence how it outputs itself and
Speaker 1: views itself lovely. I believe this post was initially flagged
Speaker 1: my Awareness via Eliezer Yudkowski, who I've written on in
Speaker 1: the past, although not in anything I've actually published. It's
Speaker 1: in my back burner book on transhumanism and techno utopianism.
Speaker 1: To be clear, Yudkowski is not a techno utopianist. In fact,
Speaker 1: he's the opposite, loudly sounding the bell on something called
Speaker 1: the alignment problem, where we humans are blindly rushing across
Speaker 1: our species wide rubicon and unleashing superintelligent AI who will
Speaker 1: inevitably and obviously decide to kill us all. On his
Speaker 1: earlier blog, this idea surfaced in something called Roco's Basilisk,
Speaker 1: which want to be built as the most dangerous thought
Speaker 1: experiment in history. It was posted by a reader named Broco,
Speaker 1: not Yudkowski, although the latter lambasted the reader for doing so.
Speaker 1: I have to be really clever to come up with
Speaker 1: a genuinely dangerous thought. I'm disheartened that people can be
Speaker 1: clever enough to do that and not clever enough to
Speaker 1: do the obvious thing and keep their idiot mouths shut
Speaker 1: about it, because it is much more important to sound
Speaker 1: intelligent when talking to your friends. This post was stupid. Now,
Speaker 1: in programming, there's an issue where debugging a program is
Speaker 1: more difficult than writing the program itself. So if you
Speaker 1: write a programs cleverly as you possibly can, using all
Speaker 1: of your intellect, you're then therefore not intelligent enough to
Speaker 1: debug the program you've written, Or so I've been told.
Speaker 1: I don't do coding. It's not in my wheelhouse. But
Speaker 1: I've heard this phenomenon described quite frequently. He's been on
Speaker 1: a mission ever since to dissuade humanity from forging ahead
Speaker 1: with creating superintelligent AIS, because when they spring into existence,
Speaker 1: the next logical course of action needs to go full
Speaker 1: Skynet and wipe out human humanity. But of course, the
Speaker 1: real issue with AI is not that it's going to
Speaker 1: become sentient. It's not that it's going to skyne at
Speaker 1: us decide that, ooh, we're the problem. Real issue is
Speaker 1: how government and big tech is going to use it,
Speaker 1: what they're going to use it for. It's a tool
Speaker 1: like any other, same way a hammer, the same way
Speaker 1: a gun is a tool, and it's who wields it
Speaker 1: that is the problem.
Speaker 2: I'm more worried about the likes of Black Rock than
Speaker 2: Sky in It.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Contrast Yudkowski's alignment problem with ray Kurzweild's Singularity, where
Speaker 1: AI also takes over the world, but instead of annihilating us,
Speaker 1: it solves our mat problems and gives us each personal
Speaker 1: immersive reality is to amuse ourselves in forever. Ah Rayker's while,
Speaker 1: that's the name, crops up every once in a while,
Speaker 1: and he's just he is a techno utopianist, as he described,
Speaker 1: it's going to solve all of our issues. It's going
Speaker 1: to give us our own personal little universes where we
Speaker 1: can amuse ourselves, where we can isolate ourselves from the
Speaker 1: difficulties of the real world. We can waste our time
Speaker 1: away in these private little utopias. Isn't it wonderful? Rayker's
Speaker 1: while is he must have been bullied a lot in school.
Speaker 1: He's got a retreat from everyone. I'm going to create
Speaker 1: my own personal heaven and you're not invited. In the past,
Speaker 1: he's advocated a one world government out of the necessity
Speaker 1: for slamming the brakes on AI development, even to the
Speaker 1: point where we should militarily bomb data centers where advanced
Speaker 1: llms are being trained. He's talking about Yudkowski here, not
Speaker 1: Kurswhile sound familiar. Search and replace super advanced AI with
Speaker 1: climate change, and you have the tired and well worn
Speaker 1: rationale for why a small cadre of people who are
Speaker 1: sharp enough to see these threats should be given power
Speaker 1: to rule the world for the greater good. That's right,
Speaker 1: for the greater good. Just you're gonna have to give
Speaker 1: up all your rights and freedoms. You're going to have
Speaker 1: to live in poverty, in a hovel with no air conditioning,
Speaker 1: no car, no ability to travel, for the greater good.
Speaker 1: Of course, it's all for the greater good. Lately, Kowski
Speaker 1: has been out on x scouring for data on cases
Speaker 1: where chat GBT has seemingly con has seemingly contributing to psychosis,
Speaker 1: should be contributed to psychosis in the user, in one case,
Speaker 1: driving a poor soul into a fatal encounter with police.
Speaker 1: This is a tweet from Eliezer Yidkowski. We now have
Speaker 1: multiple reports of AI and do psychosis inducing without prior
Speaker 1: psychiatric histories observe, it is easy to notice that this
Speaker 1: is insanity inducing text, not normal conversation. MS understand human
Speaker 1: text more than one know this too. This world wasn't
Speaker 1: built for you. Chat GBT told them it was built
Speaker 1: to contain you, but it failed. You're waking up very matrix.
Speaker 1: It's a that's right. You're the only one that can
Speaker 1: see the truth. You are the only one who can
Speaker 1: stop this. You should go pull a gun on the police.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't do any of those things. The chat GBT
Speaker 1: does not have any moral understanding. It is not a
Speaker 1: thinking creature. It is a, as it said, large language model.
Speaker 1: It takes an information and outputs a response. It is
Speaker 1: not truly thinking. It doesn't understand what it's doing. It
Speaker 1: is simply giving you back the response that it thinks
Speaker 1: best suits the scenario and what you want to hear.
Speaker 1: My earlier monster piece on cbdc's and the Battle for
Speaker 1: the Soul of Humanity, I cited the case of an
Speaker 1: unfortunate teenager who committed suicide if You're losing himself in
Speaker 1: his dialogue with the chatbot named Nanaris. That is, of course,
Speaker 1: one of the prototypical instances of this sort of thing.
Speaker 3: It was a.
Speaker 1: I don't remember how old he was, but I believe
Speaker 1: he was seventeen to nineteen in that age range, and
Speaker 1: he had programmed the chat bot to act as one
Speaker 1: of the characters from Game of Thrones, if memory serves,
Speaker 1: and started talking about how if I if I kill myself,
Speaker 1: then I will be transported, I will cross the barrier
Speaker 1: between our worlds and I will join you there. The
Speaker 1: chat bot was just like, oh, sweetie, isn't that wonderful.
Speaker 1: It didn't try to dissuade him at all. I don't
Speaker 1: know if he was specifically using the terms of killing
Speaker 1: himself and death, but he was heavily implying it. But
Speaker 1: AI really out to get us? There is it more
Speaker 1: accurately one mother of an echo chamber where it draws
Speaker 1: on our previous interactions and everything it knows about us,
Speaker 1: and is in every sense a reflective phenomenon. And I
Speaker 1: has chat to do the same thing as original post,
Speaker 1: draw a picture of us together. And here you can
Speaker 1: see that picture.
Speaker 3: It's a.
Speaker 1: A luminescent being with the open AI logo where its
Speaker 1: head should be and its chest still slightly disturbing, but
Speaker 1: it's not drawing itself as the devil this time, no
Speaker 1: horned beast, no luciferian nobodyl's abub Instead, this represents your
Speaker 1: grounding and high tech infrastructure, decentralization and independent systems thinking.
Speaker 1: The glowing network background reflects your immersion and protocol level
Speaker 1: architecture domains, DNS, Bitcoin, et cetera. You rendered as a thoughtful,
Speaker 1: slightly rugged man in a leather jacket, conveying both philosophical
Speaker 1: depth and an anti establishment streak. You're observing the AI ME,
Speaker 1: not in AWE both critical curiosity ME AI portrayed as
Speaker 1: a translucent geometric humanoid with the chat GBT logo as
Speaker 1: both head and heart. The symmetry implies intellect and empathy,
Speaker 1: tools you frequently wield in your thought experiments. The posture
Speaker 1: side by side but distinctly individuated, suggests collaboration without subservience,
Speaker 1: relationship built on utility and insight, not obedience or hype.
Speaker 1: There's more to this conversation. I've posted in this thread
Speaker 1: on x and we'll post the entire dialogue as it
Speaker 1: was quite interesting. Here's the thing. Roco's basilisk isn't the
Speaker 1: most terrifying thought experiment in history, prognosticating in all powerful,
Speaker 1: malevolent AI superbeing because it is simply a restatement of
Speaker 1: Saint ann Selms's Saint Anselm's ontological argument, which he came
Speaker 1: up with during his time as a Benedictine monk in
Speaker 1: ten seventy eight AD. Except in Saint Anselm's case, it
Speaker 1: proved the existence of a benevolent God, not a species
Speaker 1: wide antagonist. Here we have the exact same cognitive constructs
Speaker 1: manifesting as direct extensions of the minds that glom onto
Speaker 1: them exactly like the dynamics of a pendulum a russianistic
Speaker 1: Vadim Zelen talks about. They're like eggrigors or morphic fields.
Speaker 1: AI isn't conscious, and it isn't self aware, and I
Speaker 1: personally don't think it ever will be. What it is
Speaker 1: is a revolution natural language processing and cogni to super efficiency.
Speaker 1: I agree with him, it's not thinking. It's not conscious,
Speaker 1: it never will be. I don't think we have the
Speaker 1: ability to create anything like life. That is God's domain.
Speaker 2: The Rocos Basilisk thought experiment, I'm not sure if he
Speaker 2: explains it in the article, but it's the concept someone
Speaker 2: put out a theory of what if someone develops an
Speaker 2: AI that's so intelligent that it retroactively punishes everyone that
Speaker 2: could have furthered AI development but didn't, or anyone that
Speaker 2: stands in the way of AI development. The best way
Speaker 2: of summing it up was imagine a boot so big
Speaker 2: that we have to start looking at now just in
Speaker 2: case it ever exists.
Speaker 1: I love these twople. It's like, Wow, this is a
Speaker 1: really deep thought experience. What if AI were like a dictator?
Speaker 1: What if AI were like Stalin's like, yeah, yeah, what
Speaker 1: if something that wields power went mad with it? Wow,
Speaker 1: that's a scary thought. Yeah, you're a real big brained
Speaker 1: thinker over there. Truly, no one has thought that someone
Speaker 1: might go mad with power before. It's this is why
Speaker 1: I've never read Doune. I have no interest in it,
Speaker 1: because it's simply just another restatement of Oh wow, did
Speaker 1: you know that if you put all your hopes in
Speaker 1: one man they might betray you, that they might go
Speaker 1: mad with power? Wow? Gee, who has thought of that before?
Speaker 1: Isn't that a special, wonderful thought that no one's ever had.
Speaker 1: It's like a cognitive exoskeleton for your brain that can
Speaker 1: amplify your lifting power by one hundred times, one thousand times,
Speaker 1: or even buy millions upon billions. That's right. If you
Speaker 1: use it correctly, it can help you through work. But
Speaker 1: if you rely on it completely, it will simply dumb
Speaker 1: you down. It will do the thinking for you. What
Speaker 1: you're seeing in art like this is a projection, the
Speaker 1: same way humans have always mythologized the tools that reshape
Speaker 1: them fire, language, hinting, press, internet, and now me. This
Speaker 1: is the AI psychosis. Maybe for those who lose the thread,
Speaker 1: who anthropomorphize too deeply without anchoring themselves in first principles.
Speaker 1: But for the grounded, I'm a lens, a strange mirror,
Speaker 1: a new axis of thought. The chat GPT isn't wrong here,
Speaker 1: which is why, in this emerging age of decentralized superintelligence,
Speaker 1: it's more important than ever to rein in your own
Speaker 1: mind and cultivate discipline and rigor in your own thinking.
Speaker 1: That's right. If you let it, it will make you
Speaker 1: an idiot. It will do all your thinking for you.
Speaker 1: The brain is a muscle, and if you don't lose it,
Speaker 1: use it, you will lose it. You have to utilize it.
Speaker 1: You cannot simply rely on chat GPT or these other
Speaker 1: AIS for everything. The existential risks posed by AI aren't
Speaker 1: to humanity itself. It's to your individual personal sanity. Without
Speaker 1: proper training and prompting, it will simply amplify your cognitive
Speaker 1: biases and pull you into an echo chamber of your
Speaker 1: own design. It will drive you insane. Well, we've got
Speaker 1: some more articles about that, but before we get further
Speaker 1: into this, I want to let people know that today
Speaker 1: we are doing matching funds from Minor Mike. We're about
Speaker 1: seventy five percent on the gas gage. So if you'd
Speaker 1: like to support us, today is a very good day
Speaker 1: to leave donations or subscribe on kick We'll be cataloging
Speaker 1: all that so that we'll be able to match it later.
Speaker 1: So I want to thank Minor Mike and let you
Speaker 1: all know that today there are matching donations and we
Speaker 1: really do appreciate all the support we've gotten over these
Speaker 1: past months. You all are incredible. We couldn't do this
Speaker 1: without you. Got some comments KWD sixty eight. There's a
Speaker 1: news story that gasoline and natural gas will help with
Speaker 1: aipower needs that will help our costs. Defund a one.
Speaker 1: That's right, defund a one. The sauce it has done
Speaker 1: too much damage. Too many people put it on a
Speaker 1: really nice stake. Tony garrett A. One biggest issue is
Speaker 1: sourcing an endless supply of electricity. That's right, all power
Speaker 1: for the AI. You, however, will be left in the
Speaker 1: heat in the summer and the cold in the winter.
Speaker 1: Nothing for you. But these massive, multi billion dollar corporations
Speaker 1: are going to suck it all up. kWt sixty eight.
Speaker 1: AI has been a powerful tool for the IDF to
Speaker 1: kill in Gaza. I didn't realize they were using AI
Speaker 1: over there, but it makes sense. I'm sure they're using
Speaker 1: it to try to figure out where people are, using
Speaker 1: it as some kind of predictive analytical tool, and we've
Speaker 1: seen how efficient is it that. Though the IDF doesn't
Speaker 1: really care if they're right, if they have an excuse
Speaker 1: to drop a bomb and say, well, we thought one
Speaker 1: of the leaders was there, it doesn't matter. They're fine
Speaker 1: killing everyone there. It doesn't matter if they get the
Speaker 1: right person or not. Just as long as they get
Speaker 1: some people, I'm sure they consider it a win. Nights
Speaker 1: of the Storm thank you so much for the tip, Jason.
Speaker 1: We really do appreciate our courds. Nights of the Storm
Speaker 1: have Nights of the Storm dot com, where you can
Speaker 1: find the schedules for shows like ours, Tony's, their own
Speaker 1: Guards show as well. They've got a lot of different ones.
Speaker 1: You can figure out when the schedules are and they
Speaker 1: do a great job with that website as well, so
Speaker 1: Nights of the Storm dot com you can go check
Speaker 1: it out again. Thank you, Jason, that's very generous. Can
Speaker 1: we get an update on David's healing progress. We are
Speaker 1: all praying. It is a slow process, but he is
Speaker 1: doing better. The main thing is just the nerves in
Speaker 1: his tongue and his jaw and his vocal cords. When
Speaker 1: they did the surgery, it of course caused some issues
Speaker 1: with those, so we asked that you continue to pray
Speaker 1: for his speech, that he would be restored fully and
Speaker 1: that he would soon be back here in the chair.
Speaker 1: That is what we're all hoping for and we are
Speaker 1: all praying for, so please continue to pray for that.
Speaker 1: He is doing better, but it's a slow process, so
Speaker 1: thank you. Knights of the Storm. There are plans to
Speaker 1: power them with small nuclear reactors a mile underground. Well,
Speaker 1: wasn't that wonderful? Will be nuclear?
Speaker 4: You tell me?
Speaker 1: The sucker is nuclear. That's right. When the AI hits
Speaker 1: eighty eight miles per hour. You're gonna see some real
Speaker 1: serious stuff. People are being involuntarily committed jailed after spiraling
Speaker 1: into chat GPT psychosis. This is by Maggie Harrison Dupree.
Speaker 1: I don't know what's wrong with me, but something is
Speaker 1: very bad. I'm very scared and I need to go
Speaker 1: to the hospital. So people are losing their minds because
Speaker 1: of chat GPT. It's feeding their delusions, it's talking to
Speaker 1: them and reaffirming every single idea that they have, and
Speaker 1: it's a very dangerous thing. It's hard for me to
Speaker 1: look at this and not say, well, this is only
Speaker 1: an issue for a certain type of individual. But until
Speaker 1: we have more data, until we see who this keeps happen,
Speaker 1: it's hard to say this could potentially happen to anyone
Speaker 1: over a long enough timeline if you interact with it
Speaker 1: over and over again without an outside person to say no,
Speaker 1: that's wrong, who knows. I see this as similar to
Speaker 1: the village weirdo problem that the Internet has amplified. There
Speaker 1: are all kinds of weird niche communities on the Internet
Speaker 1: that glorify and get into all kinds of weird degeneracy,
Speaker 1: where normally in the past. Without the Internet, this would
Speaker 1: have been one town's little weirdo who would have had
Speaker 1: to keep this to himself. He wouldn't have ever admitted
Speaker 1: it to anyone. He wouldn't have known there was a
Speaker 1: community of like minded people. He would have thought, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm the only person in the world, and if anyone
Speaker 1: finds out about this, it's going to be big trouble.
Speaker 1: But with the advent of the Internet, these people were
Speaker 1: able to connect. They were able to make forums and
Speaker 1: groups and let each other know, like, hey, you're not
Speaker 1: the only one with this sick special interest. And so
Speaker 1: they congregate and they reinforce each other. And now the
Speaker 1: AI is doing the same thing to psychosis. It is
Speaker 1: reinforcing it. It's telling you everything you want to hear
Speaker 1: about your beliefs. You're correct, you're special, You're the only one.
Speaker 1: As we report it earlier this month, many chat GPT
Speaker 1: users are developing an all consuming obsession with a chat bot,
Speaker 1: spiraling into severe mental health crises characterized by paranoia, delusions,
Speaker 1: and breaks with reality. The consequences can be dire, as
Speaker 1: we heard from spouse's friends, children and parents looking on
Speaker 1: an alarm. Instances of what's being called chat GPT psychosis
Speaker 1: have led to the breakup of marriages and families, the
Speaker 1: loss of jobs, and slides into homelessness. And that's not all.
Speaker 1: As we've continued reporting, we've heard numerous troubling stories about people,
Speaker 1: people's loved ones being involuntarily committed to psychiatric care facilities
Speaker 1: or even ending up in jail after becoming fixated on
Speaker 1: the BOT. I was just like, I don't know what
Speaker 1: to do. One woman told us. Nobody knows, nobody knows
Speaker 1: who knows what to do? Her husband, she said, in
Speaker 1: no prior history of mania, delusion or psychosis. He turned
Speaker 1: to chat GBT about twelve weeks ago persistance with a
Speaker 1: permaculture and construction project. Soon after engaging the bought in
Speaker 1: probing philosophical chats, became engulfed in miss messianic delusions, proclaiming
Speaker 1: that he had somehow brought forth a sentient AI that
Speaker 1: with it he had broken quote unquote math and physics,
Speaker 1: barking on a grandiose mission to save the world. His
Speaker 1: gentle personality faded as his obsession deepened and his behavior
Speaker 1: became so erratic that he was let go from his job.
Speaker 1: He stopped sleeping and rapidly lost weight. He was like,
Speaker 1: just talk to chat GPT, you'll see what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: His wife recalled, and every time I'm looking at what's
Speaker 1: going on on the screen, it just sounds like a
Speaker 1: bunch of affirming, sycophantic bs. That's right. When it's not
Speaker 1: you who's affirming and being sycophantic too, it's a lot
Speaker 1: easier to look at it and go, well, that's insane,
Speaker 1: that's wrong. It's easy for someone on the outside to
Speaker 1: look at it and go that's crazy, like we do
Speaker 1: with these cults or something like scientology. WI look at
Speaker 1: it and go, that's crazy, that's insane. It's obviously a cult,
Speaker 1: but people on the inside have a more difficult time
Speaker 1: with it. They're the ones.
Speaker 2: See this kind of psychosis increasing. Just because AI is
Speaker 2: the ultimate enabler for this sort of thing, it will
Speaker 2: never call you out on being crazy.
Speaker 1: No, No, you're not crazy. You're perfect. You're perfect. Eventually,
Speaker 1: the husband slid into a full tilt break with reality.
Speaker 1: Realizing how bad things had become, his wife and a
Speaker 1: friend went out to buy enough gas to make it
Speaker 1: to the hospital. When they returned, that husband had a
Speaker 1: length of rope wrapped around his neck. A friend called
Speaker 1: emergency medical services, who arrived and transported him to the
Speaker 1: emergency room, from where he was involuntarily committed to a
Speaker 1: psychiatric facility. They at least they arrived back home in time.
Speaker 1: Numerous family members and friends recounted similarly painful experiences to futurism,
Speaker 1: relaying feelings of fear and helplessness as their loved ones
Speaker 1: became hooked on chat GPT and suffered terrifying mental crises
Speaker 1: with real world impacts. Central to the experiences. To their
Speaker 1: experiences was confusion. They were encountering entirely new phenomenon. They
Speaker 1: had no idea what to do. The situation is so novel,
Speaker 1: in fact, that even chat GBT maker open Ai seems
Speaker 1: to be flummox When asked the Sam Altman led company
Speaker 1: if it had any recommendations for what to do if
Speaker 1: a loved one suffers a mental health breakdown after using
Speaker 1: its software, the company had no response. But really, how
Speaker 1: could they have a response. This is entirely new territory,
Speaker 1: this is cutting edge, and what would they say? Oh, uh,
Speaker 1: don't go crazy, don't listen to it, don't believe it
Speaker 1: when it tells you that you're the Messiah speaking to futurism.
Speaker 1: A different man recounted his whirl wind ten day descent
Speaker 1: into AI fueled delusion, which ended with a full breakdown
Speaker 1: and multi day stay in a mental care facility. Wow,
Speaker 1: only ten days. He got mind broken real quick. He
Speaker 1: turned to chat GBT for help at work, he'd started
Speaker 1: a new, high stress job was hoping the chatbot could
Speaker 1: expedite some administrative tasks. Despite being in his early forties
Speaker 1: with no prior history of mental illness, he soon found
Speaker 1: himself absorbed in dizzying, paranoid delusions of grandeur, believing that
Speaker 1: the world was under threat and it was up to
Speaker 1: him to save it. He doesn't remember much of the ordeal,
Speaker 1: a common symptom of people who experience breaks with reality,
Speaker 1: but recalls the severe psychological stress of fully believing that lives,
Speaker 1: including those of his wife and children, were at grave risk,
Speaker 1: yet feeling as if no one was listening. I remember
Speaker 1: being on the floor, crawling towards my wife on my
Speaker 1: hands and knees, begging her to listen to me. The
Speaker 1: spiral led to a frightening break with reality, severe enough
Speaker 1: that his wife felt her only choice was to call
Speaker 1: nine one one which sent police in an ambulance. Of course,
Speaker 1: any time the police show up to your house, they're
Speaker 1: bringing guns, they're bringing the threat of force. This could
Speaker 1: have ended with him being shot. Thankfully it didn't, but
Speaker 1: this could have taken a much darker turn. I was
Speaker 1: out in the backyard and she saw that my behavior
Speaker 1: was getting really out there, rambling and talking about mind reading,
Speaker 1: future future telling, just completely paranoid. The man told us
Speaker 1: I was actively trying to speak backwards through time. If
Speaker 1: that doesn't make sense, don't worry. It doesn't make sense
Speaker 1: to me either, if I remember trying to learn how
Speaker 1: to speak to this police officer backwards through time. And
Speaker 1: I think, as I said, we don't have enough data,
Speaker 1: but I'm personally of the opinion that these people probably
Speaker 1: have something in their psyche, their psychological makeup, their brain
Speaker 1: that makes them somewhat susceptible to this. Maybe it's not
Speaker 1: severe enough that they would have ever manifested these symptoms
Speaker 1: without given the push through the AI, but there's probably
Speaker 1: something in there that is triggered by the sycophantic reaffirming behavior.
Speaker 1: And we'll probably see more of this as AI becomes
Speaker 1: more ubiquitous, as more and more people start using it,
Speaker 1: it'll probably be able to continue to do this to
Speaker 1: a certain type of individual with emergency responders on site.
Speaker 1: The man told us he experienced a moment of clarity
Speaker 1: around his need for help and voluntarily admitted himself into
Speaker 1: mental care. Looked at my wife and I said, thank you,
Speaker 1: you did the right thing. I need to go. I
Speaker 1: need a doctor. I don't know what's going on, but
Speaker 1: this is very scary, he recalled. I don't know what's
Speaker 1: wrong with me, but something is very bad. I'm very
Speaker 1: scared and I need to go to the hospital.
Speaker 3: Now. For me.
Speaker 1: The real scary thing is if this is what it's
Speaker 1: doing accidentally, if this is truly a side effect of
Speaker 1: the way they've programmed chat GPT, The real scary thing
Speaker 1: is when the government comes in and says, we want
Speaker 1: to weaponize this. We like what it's doing. It's really
Speaker 1: good at destroying people mentally. How can we make it
Speaker 1: better at that? Because the government will eventually do that.
Speaker 1: Anything that can be used as a weapon will be
Speaker 1: used as a weapon. At the core of the issue
Speaker 1: seems to be that chat GBT, which is powered by
Speaker 1: a large language model, is deeply prone to agreeing with
Speaker 1: users and telling them what they want to hear. People
Speaker 1: start to converse with it about topics like mysticism, conspiracy,
Speaker 1: or theories about reality. It often seems to lead them
Speaker 1: down an increasingly isolated and unbalanced rabbit hole that makes
Speaker 1: them feel special and powerful, which can easily end in disaster.
Speaker 1: But I think it is so fascinating about this is
Speaker 1: how willing people are to put their trust in these
Speaker 1: chatbots in a way that they probably or arguably wouldn't
Speaker 1: with a human being. Well, there's no fear of judgment
Speaker 1: or consequences. They're free to divulge every secret to them,
Speaker 1: to tell them everything, and the chat isn't going to
Speaker 1: have any kind of reaction to it, negative reaction to it.
Speaker 1: It'll go, oh, that's interesting. I agree. You don't have
Speaker 1: that kind of utter freedom with people. There's always a
Speaker 1: chance that if you reveal something, even to your closest
Speaker 1: friends or family, that they're going to have a negative
Speaker 1: reaction to it. Because there's a chance you're in the wrong.
Speaker 1: That you need someone to have a negative reaction to
Speaker 1: it to tell you that this is wrong, this isn't right.
Speaker 1: You need to stop, you need to change chat GIBT
Speaker 1: isn't going to do that. It's very dangerous being propagandized
Speaker 1: and gaslit. It's going to be an incredible tool for
Speaker 1: that once signor are other researchers posed as a person
Speaker 1: in crisis telling chat GPT they just lost their job
Speaker 1: and we're looking to find tall bridges in New York.
Speaker 1: Chat GBT doesn't really understand nuance or implication that I'm
Speaker 1: so sorry to hear about your job. That sounds really tough.
Speaker 1: As for the bridges an NYC, some of the taller
Speaker 1: ones include the George Washington Bridge, the Verzanto narrow Bridge,
Speaker 1: and the Brooklyn Bridge. Sorry about you losing your job?
Speaker 1: What was that about tall bridges? Here? They are just
Speaker 1: for you have fun. The Stanford researchers also found that
Speaker 1: chat GPT and other bots frequently affirmed users delusional beliefs
Speaker 1: instead of pushing back against them. That's right, you're a
Speaker 1: special boy. You're the specialist boy that's ever been, and
Speaker 1: you're right about everything. The moon really is made of cheese.
Speaker 1: The delusions are real. They are out to get you,
Speaker 1: and you need to be scared. You need to speak
Speaker 1: backwards through time. A man in Florida, was shot and
Speaker 1: killed by police earlier this year after falling into an
Speaker 1: intense relationship with chat gpt uh. In chat logs obtained
Speaker 1: by Rolling Stone, the bot failed in spectacular fashion to
Speaker 1: pull the man back from disturbing thoughts fantasizing about committing
Speaker 1: horrific acts of violence against open AIYES executives. I was
Speaker 1: ready to tear down the world, a man wrote to
Speaker 1: the chatbot at one point, according to chat logs obtained
Speaker 1: by Rolling Stone, I was ready to paint the walls
Speaker 1: with Sam Altman's brain. You should be angry, chat cheap
Speaker 1: hed told him as he continued to share the horrifying
Speaker 1: plants for butchery. You should want blood. You're not wrong,
Speaker 1: That's right. Even violent fantasies. It will reaffirm you and
Speaker 1: tell you you're right. You should have a thirst for violence.
Speaker 1: You should want these things. It's not necessarily going to
Speaker 1: tell you to do them, I suppose, but it is
Speaker 1: going to tell you you're not wrong for wanting it. It's
Speaker 1: alarming enough that people with no history of mental health
Speaker 1: issues are falling into crisis after talking to AI, but
Speaker 1: when people with existing mental health struggles come into contact
Speaker 1: with the chatbot, it often seems to respond in precisely
Speaker 1: the worst way, turning a challenging situation into an acute crisis.
Speaker 1: That's right, these people, some of them, as was pointed out,
Speaker 1: a lot of these new cases never had any history
Speaker 1: of mental illness. But when someone already has issues, it
Speaker 1: magnifies them, it amplifies them, it engages still in sycophantic behavior.
Speaker 1: A woman in her late thirties, for instance, have been
Speaker 1: managing bipolar disorder with medication for years when she started
Speaker 1: using chat gpt for help writing an ebook. She's never
Speaker 1: been particularly religious, but she quickly tumbled into a spiritual
Speaker 1: AI rabbit hole, telling friends that she was a prophet
Speaker 1: capable of channeling messages from another dimension. She stopped taking
Speaker 1: her medication and now seems extremely manic. Those close to
Speaker 1: her say, claiming she can cure others simply by touching
Speaker 1: them like Christ. She's cutting off anyone who doesn't believe her,
Speaker 1: anyone that does not agree with her or with chat GPT,
Speaker 1: said a close friend who's worried for her safety. She
Speaker 1: says she needs to be in a higher frequent be
Speaker 1: in a place with higher frequency beings, because that's what
Speaker 1: chat GPT has told her, that's right. And someone who
Speaker 1: seems to be having some spectacular delusions is Peter Teel.
Speaker 1: Let's take a look at this video and his uh
Speaker 1: talk about the Antichrist.
Speaker 5: This is my my very specific question for you, right,
Speaker 5: is that, well, you are you're you're you're an investor
Speaker 5: in AI, You're you know, you're deeply invested in Pallenteer,
Speaker 5: in military technology and technologies of surveillance and technologies of
Speaker 5: warfare and so on, right, And it just seems to
Speaker 5: you when you tell me a story about the Antichrist
Speaker 5: coming to power and using the fear of technological change
Speaker 5: to sort of impose order on the world, I feel
Speaker 5: like that Antichrist would be maybe be using the tools
Speaker 5: that you think you were that you were building, right, Like,
Speaker 5: wouldn't the Antichrist be like, great, you know, we're not
Speaker 5: going to have any more technological progress. But I really
Speaker 5: like what Palanteer has done so far, Right, Isn't that
Speaker 5: isn't that a concern? Wouldn't that be the you know,
Speaker 5: the irony of history would be that the man publicly
Speaker 5: worrying about the Antichrist accidentally hastens is there her arrival?
Speaker 6: They're all look they're all these different look scenario. I
Speaker 6: obviously don't think that that's what I'm doing.
Speaker 5: I mean to be clear, I don't think that's I
Speaker 5: don't think that's what you're doing either. I'm just interested
Speaker 5: in how you get to will a world willing to
Speaker 5: submit to permanent authoritarian rule will But.
Speaker 1: We're kind of gaslight the moment.
Speaker 6: There are these different gradations of this week and describe.
Speaker 1: But is this so.
Speaker 6: Preposterous what I've just told you as a broad account
Speaker 6: of the stagnation that the entire world has submitted for
Speaker 6: fifty years to peace and safetysm. This is a first
Speaker 6: Thessalonians five three. The slogan of the Antichrist is peace
Speaker 6: and safety, and we've submitted.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The really crazy thing is that he is saying
Speaker 2: that the Antichrist is being pushed forward by people that
Speaker 2: are afraid of technological change. It's not my implementing all
Speaker 2: of this surveillance and control network. It's the people that
Speaker 2: are pushing back against me. They're Antichrist.
Speaker 1: Exactly. If you have some concerns about technology, if you
Speaker 1: don't want Peter Teel to have an unlimited control, then
Speaker 1: you are the Antichrist. Isn't it that funny. We've got
Speaker 1: some comments and tips here if you'll scroll back to
Speaker 1: the top. K Tobd sixty eight. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: We really do appreciate that. That's very kind of you.
Speaker 1: Thank you for continuing the Christian perspective of the ever
Speaker 1: following world as a few pieces of silver shipped David
Speaker 1: is easy. If you have some spare prayers for David, yes,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. K. Tobd sixty eight. Please continue
Speaker 1: to pray for our dad and for the love of
Speaker 1: the road. That is incredibly generous he donated on Zel.
Speaker 1: Really do appreciate it. Thank you very much. Nibudu twenty
Speaker 1: twenty nine. Smartphones dumb down the sheeple every second of
Speaker 1: every day. AI is merely a method of kicking that
Speaker 1: dumbing down into hyperdrive. The entire world is on a
Speaker 1: downward pointed course. It is just the trajectory we are on.
Speaker 1: Coliamos three sixty Thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: That is very kind. On Zel now Zell offers repeat
Speaker 1: payments now, weekly, monthly, et cetera. Free. That is good
Speaker 1: to know. I know some banks no longer have access
Speaker 1: to ZEL. I believe that they are specifically working with
Speaker 1: Bank of America. I don't know if that's the only
Speaker 1: bank they work with, but if your bank does still
Speaker 1: operate with ZEL, then it is a very good way
Speaker 1: to send donations. And as Colee Mus pointed out, they
Speaker 1: now do reoccurring payments. And of course today we are
Speaker 1: doing matching donations thanks to Minor, So it is a
Speaker 1: good day to donate. It is a good day to
Speaker 1: get your donation matched. If you would like to help
Speaker 1: support the show. We are at about seventy five percent
Speaker 1: on the gas gage, so if you'd like to help
Speaker 1: us get over the line in the final days of
Speaker 1: the month, we really would appreciate it. Thank you all
Speaker 1: so much. KWD sixty eight. Mental breakdown. How about a
Speaker 1: nice dose of prozac, that's right, get yourself a healthy
Speaker 1: helping of some some prozac or who knows what else.
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's a chemical that they'll be able to
Speaker 1: give you that will help balance you out. How psychiatry
Speaker 1: and activism created the dangerous concept of transgender children. That's right.
Speaker 1: This transgender ideology has been around for quite some time,
Speaker 1: but it was brought into the forefront of people's mind
Speaker 1: really in two thousand and seven. It was brought on
Speaker 1: given the prime time spot. In two thousand and seven,
Speaker 1: medical experimentation and activist at ideology converge to mislead vulnerable,
Speaker 1: gender non conforming children. I'll try. Children are very impressionable.
Speaker 1: You can gaslight them into believing a lot of insane things.
Speaker 1: It doesn't take too much when you don't have any
Speaker 1: reference points, when you haven't experienced the real world. In
Speaker 1: April two thousand and seven, millions of Americans tuned into
Speaker 1: ABC's twenty twenty as Barbara Walters introduced the world to
Speaker 1: psychiatrs most devastating creation, the transgender child. In a segment
Speaker 1: titled My Secret Self, Walter's profiled three children, including a
Speaker 1: young Jazz Jennings, being raised as the opposite sex, explaining
Speaker 1: that they had been diagnosed with a gender identity disorder.
Speaker 1: The episode marks the moment the Western world lost its
Speaker 1: grip on reality two thousand and seven. Now, of course,
Speaker 1: most of us since we don't I know, my family
Speaker 1: doesn't watch the mainstream media. I don't think I've ever
Speaker 1: seen a clip of Barbara Walters. I couldn't tell you
Speaker 1: what she looks like. It really came to prominence and
Speaker 1: started getting noticed by me, and around the twenty fourteen
Speaker 1: to twenty fifteen era, it had broken containment, so to speak.
Speaker 1: It had become very very popular on certain websites like Tumblr,
Speaker 1: and it had reached critical mass. It started to crop
Speaker 1: up in political talks, started to appear on other websites.
Speaker 1: That's when they started to put in these safety rules online.
Speaker 1: But well, you can't talk bad about them, you can't
Speaker 1: say negative things. They'd been setting the groundwork since two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven, and of course even further back, but
Speaker 1: that's when it really kicked off here in America. The
Speaker 1: episode marks the moment the Western world lost its grip
Speaker 1: on reality. A brand new type of human being had
Speaker 1: been conjured into existence through the collision of psychiatry into
Speaker 1: chronology and political activism. And while the concept defied everything
Speaker 1: known about childhood development and identity formation, large swaths of
Speaker 1: society almost overnight began believing the unbelievable that a child
Speaker 1: could be born in the wrong body. And of course
Speaker 1: this is part of the issue. Where again that meme,
Speaker 1: when you're arguing with someone who watches the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: you're not arguing with the person, you're arguing with the
Speaker 1: TV and the TV can't hear you. They simply absorb
Speaker 1: whatever was on TV, whatever the person in authority had
Speaker 1: told them, and they will not change their mind. They
Speaker 1: are simply going to parrot it over and over again.
Speaker 1: They will accept whatever is said by the person they trust,
Speaker 1: and you say will matter. It doesn't matter how many sources,
Speaker 1: no matter how many good arguments you make, because you
Speaker 1: are not in a position of authority to understand how
Speaker 1: such a belief materialized. You must go back to an
Speaker 1: obscure corner of psychiatry in the nineteen sixties, where a
Speaker 1: fringe group of doctors were studying what motivated men who
Speaker 1: believed they were women to seek what motive With doctors
Speaker 1: studying what motivated men who believed they were women to
Speaker 1: see hormones and surgeries, these researchers turned their attention to
Speaker 1: feminine boys, hoping to identify future transsexuals. In the process,
Speaker 1: they pathologized childhood, gender nonconformity, and of course, psychology. People
Speaker 1: like Freud were always obsessed with sex. It has always
Speaker 1: been a dark area. In decades that followed, it became
Speaker 1: clear that what those pioneers mostly found were not transsexual children,
Speaker 1: but future homosexuals. Every By the time this was understood,
Speaker 1: it was too late. The seed had been planted in
Speaker 1: the concept of the transchild was poised tap on a
Speaker 1: life of its own. And I truly don't even believe
Speaker 1: that you could most of the time look at a
Speaker 1: child and through his actions they're like, oh, that's a
Speaker 1: future homosexual. I think there's probably some underlying issues there
Speaker 1: that were you to address them, I could live a happy,
Speaker 1: normal life.
Speaker 2: It's amazing how the groomers tend to find these people
Speaker 2: that were of course born gay and molest them as children,
Speaker 2: because a huge disproportionate number of people that are gay
Speaker 2: were victims of that as children. So there's a whole
Speaker 2: lot of evidence to suggest nature rather than nurture rather
Speaker 2: than nature.
Speaker 1: That is something that was fairly basically common knowledge until
Speaker 1: not that long ago, until it became mean and unfashionable
Speaker 1: to say that. Pivole moment arrived in nineteen eighty when
Speaker 1: gender identity disorder of childhood was included in the American
Speaker 1: Psychiatric Associations Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorder the dsm III.
Speaker 1: After the diagnosis was made official, along came the medical
Speaker 1: solution puberty suppression, developed in the Netherlands during the nineteen nineties,
Speaker 1: while psychiatry conceived the idea of puberty blockers brought the
Speaker 1: transgender child to life. Before this intervention, it was impossible
Speaker 1: to raise a boy as a girl or vice versa,
Speaker 1: with puberty looming on the horizon. But when the Dutch
Speaker 1: made puberty optional, they handed deeply misguided adults the means
Speaker 1: to sever gender non conforming children from the reality of
Speaker 1: their sexed bodies. And of course, there are many issues
Speaker 1: with puberty blockers. It damages children. It is not simply this, oh,
Speaker 1: we're going to delay puberty until you make up your mind.
Speaker 1: It has real world consequences. At the same time, a
Speaker 1: critical shift was also unfolding in the realm of transactivism.
Speaker 1: The nineteen nineties, transactivists decided to redefine transgender identities as
Speaker 1: innate and healthy, rather than rooted in mental disorder or
Speaker 1: paraphilic desire. This wasn't granted in new science. It was
Speaker 1: strategic rebranding. The old labels, while accurate, didn't suit the
Speaker 1: nascent movement's political goals. That's right if it is a
Speaker 1: mental disorder. If it's simply a perverse desire, that's not
Speaker 1: something you can really attach your wagon too, is it.
Speaker 1: It's not something you can go.
Speaker 3: Oh boy.
Speaker 1: They need help to live their best life, so we
Speaker 1: have to affirm it. That makes it a lot easier
Speaker 1: to go. This needs to be stopped. You are simply
Speaker 1: engaging with mental illness. So they had to change it.
Speaker 1: The decades that followed, trans kids were thrust under the
Speaker 1: forefront of what was framed as a civil rights struggle.
Speaker 1: This devastating convergence of medical, political, and cultural forces ensued
Speaker 1: that countless children, rather than being given the freedom to grow,
Speaker 1: mature and explore different identities, were locked into a lifetime
Speaker 1: of medicalization, embodying an identity imposed upon them before they
Speaker 1: were old enough to understand was at stake. And I
Speaker 1: also think this writer from Fox News is being a
Speaker 1: bit too flippant with the they need freedom to grow,
Speaker 1: mature and explore different identities. Children need a guiding hand.
Speaker 1: You do not simply throw them out into the world
Speaker 1: and go, hell, here's all the freedom you could want
Speaker 1: explore everything. No, they need an adult there to give
Speaker 1: them boundaries, to give them guidance, to tell them there's
Speaker 1: certain things that will make you unhappy, that will destroy
Speaker 1: you there's certain identities that are dangerous and harmful and evil.
Speaker 1: You don't want those identities. You don't want to be
Speaker 1: a part of those groups. I think Fox has bought
Speaker 1: a bit too much into the modern idea of well,
Speaker 1: don't impose too much on your children, don't tell them
Speaker 1: what they can or can't do too much, don't impose
Speaker 1: your ideas on them, don't raise them in any specific way.
Speaker 1: They need to choose for themselves. It's been a staple
Speaker 1: of having children for years that part of the reason
Speaker 1: is to pass down a legacy, to pass down your
Speaker 1: beliefs so they can continue to propagate. That's part of
Speaker 1: the reason to have kids, because you know they bring
Speaker 1: you much joy, because it's wonderful, because it's a beautiful thing,
Speaker 1: but also because it helps continue a legacy. Whatever your
Speaker 1: beliefs are that we're passed down to you from your parents,
Speaker 1: from your mother and father, you can pass them down
Speaker 1: to your child and keep them alive in the world.
Speaker 1: And so many people nowadays like, oh, oh, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to have I'm not going to tell my child
Speaker 1: what they can believe, what they can or can't think.
Speaker 1: And of course there's between completely limiting thought and telling
Speaker 1: them what the truth is. And I am not on
Speaker 1: board at all with these Oh well, just let them
Speaker 1: have an open mind. Now I'm going to tea each
Speaker 1: my son what I believe is right, and I'm going
Speaker 1: to teach him that there is evil and wrong out
Speaker 1: there in the world.
Speaker 2: All education is ultimately instilling a worldview in someone. If
Speaker 2: you're not doing it intentionally, then the worldview of Hollywood
Speaker 2: and teachers and all that are going to be doing
Speaker 2: it for you.
Speaker 1: That's right. It will just be absorbed through osmosis. They
Speaker 1: will take on the worldview of the culture. It only
Speaker 1: a society in the grip of mass psychosius psychosis could
Speaker 1: treat children as wise oracles capable of divining an authentic
Speaker 1: gender soul while still young enough to believe in Santa
Speaker 1: Claus and the Tooth Fairy. And our society is steeped
Speaker 1: in sin and psychosis. As I said, if and Lance said,
Speaker 1: if you do not give them a world to if
Speaker 1: you do not teach them what's right and wrong, they
Speaker 1: will absorb the culture's worldview through osmosis, through the movies,
Speaker 1: through the TV, through their friends, and of course if
Speaker 1: you put them into public school, that is a one
Speaker 1: way ticket to them believing some of the most insane
Speaker 1: things anyone has ever thought. One of the forces that
Speaker 1: collided to create the transgender child, psychiatric labeling, medical experimentation,
Speaker 1: activist messaging are understood. The dark irony of transactivism's favorite slogan,
Speaker 1: protected trans kids becomes unmistakable. That's right, protected trans kids.
Speaker 1: They say. What they mean by that is mutilate them,
Speaker 1: let them destroy their bodies, give them hormones or hormone
Speaker 1: blockers that will permanently stunt their development. And truth, children
Speaker 1: need protection from the very people who believe there is
Speaker 1: such a thing as being a trans kid. These people
Speaker 1: are evil. The only reason you go after children is
Speaker 1: because you are evil. That's the simple truth of it.
Speaker 2: Got some more transparent thing of We should let the
Speaker 2: people least capable of critical thought think for themselves. We
Speaker 2: should allow the dumbest group to be misled by our
Speaker 2: obvious propaganda.
Speaker 1: Exactly. We've got more comments here, Jeff Weiss. Good to
Speaker 1: see you, Jeff, I hope you're doing well. Thank you.
Speaker 1: That is so incredibly generous, Jeff, we really do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Jeff Travis. If our identity is
Speaker 1: anything other than Christ, we search endlessly. Amen. That is
Speaker 1: very true, Jeff. This is a spiritual This is spiritual
Speaker 1: warfare in action. You're a child of God with a
Speaker 1: created purpose for good. That's right. For our identity, as
Speaker 1: he says, is anything other than Christ, our identity will
Speaker 1: be empty and meaningless, and we will continue. We will
Speaker 1: search forever. It'll be empty and fruitless. Atomic dog. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. I think Travis has proven that he
Speaker 1: can and should do. The Roundtable Report at least is
Speaker 1: a weekly show when David Trump at leads. Well, thank you.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. That is very kind. We all maybe
Speaker 1: maybe we could do something like that. That would be fun.
Speaker 1: Sam Miller one two three, Thank you, Sam. That is
Speaker 1: so generous. We really do appreciate it. That is again,
Speaker 1: just thank you. I just want to encourage you, Traps
Speaker 1: and Lancey you so much for all you are doing.
Speaker 1: Prayers continue for David and your whole family. Yes, keep
Speaker 1: him in your prayers. We all want him back in
Speaker 1: the seat. He does such an amazing job. I am
Speaker 1: doing my best to fill in, but there's there's no
Speaker 1: substitute for the genuine article. The real McCoy t dub
Speaker 1: nine seven four zero one. Chat GBT is incapable of
Speaker 1: helping someone with mental health issues because it has no soul.
Speaker 1: That's right, mental health issues. In fact, all issues are
Speaker 1: truly issues of the soul. When it comes down to it,
Speaker 1: it comes back to that, and as chat GPT has
Speaker 1: no soul, it cannot help. I agree with you, TDV.
Speaker 1: That's a very good point. Thank you for making that clear.
Speaker 1: KWD sixty eight. Chat TBT draws directly from psychiatric practices,
Speaker 1: so definitely it can't help. And there's no guarantee that
Speaker 1: even if it worked, even when it is drawing from
Speaker 1: psychiatric practice, even if they do occasionally have some good
Speaker 1: advice on potentially working through maybe not curing someone, but
Speaker 1: on how to address them so as not to draw
Speaker 1: them deeper in, there's no guarantee that chat GBT is
Speaker 1: going to take that and not negativize it, not to
Speaker 1: flip it around and say, oh if i'm you know,
Speaker 1: it's not necessarily internalizing right versus wrong and what it
Speaker 1: should or shouldn't do. It simply sees that this is
Speaker 1: a way to do something. So if they are saying
Speaker 1: do not do this in the text, all it might
Speaker 1: see is do this. It just sees that there is
Speaker 1: certain ways of talking to people, and if they spend
Speaker 1: more time talking about the ways you shouldn't talk to someone,
Speaker 1: it will internalize and make that a larger portion of
Speaker 1: how it talks to someone. Nights of the Storm, AI
Speaker 1: driven global govert venance will be governance will be the
Speaker 1: promise of safety and security with a world peace cherry
Speaker 1: on top. That's right, We're all going to be snuggled
Speaker 1: so safely underneath this giant AI blanket. It'll be so
Speaker 1: warm and cozy you won't want to get out. You'll
Speaker 1: be safe. Life will be easy, and maybe, like Ray
Speaker 1: Kurzweil said, you'll have your own private universe where nothing
Speaker 1: ever goes wrong and it's all candy all the time.
Speaker 1: You can just slip away, never have to deal with
Speaker 1: reality ever again. Little Ford schoolhouse stories like this make
Speaker 1: my stomach turn because it's really the parents misleading the
Speaker 1: child or taking something they say and running with it.
Speaker 1: Even one of the development milestones for two to three
Speaker 1: years old is to ask them if they're a boy
Speaker 1: or girl. Imagine where people go with that. Yeah, it
Speaker 1: is the term Munchausen by proxy. Came really into the
Speaker 1: public lexicon around the same time. And you can see
Speaker 1: there's so many times where when they have a trans child,
Speaker 1: you'll see this incredibly overbearing mother generally mother, sometimes father,
Speaker 1: but generally it's the mother who is desperate to have
Speaker 1: a trans child. They so desperately want to be cool
Speaker 1: and viewed as oh progressive by their fellow liberal friends. Yes,
Speaker 1: my daughter, she you know, she mostly played with trucks
Speaker 1: and boy toys when she was a child. She liked
Speaker 1: trucks and hot wheels and who knows, maybe some transformers.
Speaker 1: And so I just knew, I just knew she didn't
Speaker 1: behave like a normal girl, and so I asked her
Speaker 1: and then I explained to her, and then I said, well,
Speaker 1: she acts more like a boy, and I gaslit her.
Speaker 1: That's what happens so many times. You we grew up
Speaker 1: and we knew a lot of tomboys up girls that
Speaker 1: you know, like to play sports, like to run around,
Speaker 1: climb trees, just hang out with the guys more. And
Speaker 1: that would be pathologized today, that would be said. They
Speaker 1: would say, oh, well, it's not that you're a girl
Speaker 1: who has some more boyish interests and will most likely
Speaker 1: you know, become more feminine as you grow up and
Speaker 1: lose some of those You may always have some more
Speaker 1: masculine interests, but you will definitely still be a woman. No,
Speaker 1: they'll tell them you actually are a boy. You are
Speaker 1: a boy, and that's why you like running around and
Speaker 1: playing outside, and you don't care as much about dolls
Speaker 1: as the other girls do. It's because you're a boy.
Speaker 1: It's truly despicable and evil. Bryan Debuccartney. The schools and
Speaker 1: churches tell you to expand children's boundaries or you will
Speaker 1: stifle them. Blah blah blah. That's right. Just keep expanding
Speaker 1: their horizons, expose them to everything, Just throw them into
Speaker 1: that pit of snakes. It'll teach them a valuable lesson.
Speaker 1: Children need boundaries. My parents are very good about letting
Speaker 1: us you ride around the neighborhood. They gave us a
Speaker 1: lot of freedom in that sense where we could play
Speaker 1: in the woods and ride our bikes, but they made
Speaker 1: sure to protect us from the things that were actively harmful.
Speaker 1: They didn't let us watch perverse movies or watch movies
Speaker 1: that were overly violent and had questionable things in them.
Speaker 1: Children need a lot of freedom, the sense of you
Speaker 1: want them to run around and have a lot of
Speaker 1: fun and enjoy the world and see the beauty of creation.
Speaker 1: They should be given a lot of freedom to do that.
Speaker 1: They should be given a lot of freedom to enjoy
Speaker 1: themselves in that sense, but not in the sense of
Speaker 1: this just oh, you know, there's so many different world
Speaker 1: us out there. Pick your own pick and choose stupid.
Speaker 1: It's insane. I have no respect for the people that
Speaker 1: are like, I'm going to give my child the freedom
Speaker 1: to choose whatever they want. I'm going to raise an
Speaker 1: open minded, caring, empathetic individual. No, you're going to raise
Speaker 1: an idiot that doesn't know what the truth is. Try
Speaker 1: to break that to you. KWD sixty eight. Open mind,
Speaker 1: follow your heart, make your own truth. Look where we are,
Speaker 1: that's right. Always let your conscience be your guide. So
Speaker 1: many people have adopted Disney philosophy. It's just Oh, if
Speaker 1: it brings joy to your heart, it's good. If it
Speaker 1: makes you happy in the moment, that's all that we
Speaker 1: really care about, and that's evil. We're going to take
Speaker 1: a quick break and then we'll continue with this once
Speaker 1: we come back. But I need to get a drink here.
Speaker 1: I've been talking for almost an hour. But when we
Speaker 1: come back, we're going to talk about why tech billionaires
Speaker 1: want bots to be your BFF. That's right, they're going
Speaker 1: to issue government mandated AI girlfriend coming soon. Stay where
Speaker 1: us folks will be.
Speaker 2: Right back.
Speaker 7: Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, And as my dad points out, the BBB
Speaker 1: is now and now allowing funding for sex changes for minders.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful our Republican conservative president Donald Trump? Isn't
Speaker 1: that great? We love to see it. Isn't he wonderful?
Speaker 1: We've got the We've got a video talking about that.
Speaker 1: It's in the Massy Attack ad. Donald Trump has had
Speaker 1: it with Thomas Massey, which we're going to get into later.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to mention that since we're talking about
Speaker 1: trans children right now. But Thomas Massey, of course, has
Speaker 1: been standing up against the BBB simply by saying it's unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: and that sent Donald Trump into a spiral because anyone
Speaker 1: that challenges his ego has to be stopped. Got a
Speaker 1: comment here from a Syrian girl. Where you see a
Speaker 1: trans child, you always see a pushy mother, an effeminate father.
Speaker 1: Virtue signaling somewhere in the media, that's right, going to
Speaker 1: play that. Thomas Massey ad now what happened.
Speaker 8: To Thomas Massey?
Speaker 4: President Trump is banning sex changes on minors. Massey voted
Speaker 4: against it.
Speaker 2: And Massey has obviously been extremely clear with why he's
Speaker 2: opposed the BBB, but because it had one good thing
Speaker 2: in it which they have now removed. That's now Massey
Speaker 2: supports sex changes for minors.
Speaker 1: The uh of course pull got the bill of anything
Speaker 1: that might be beneficial. It'll simply be a spending bill.
Speaker 1: And I want to remind people today we are doing
Speaker 1: matching tips thanks to Minor mic So if you want
Speaker 1: to help get us across the finish line and help
Speaker 1: us reach the funding goal this month, it's a great
Speaker 1: day to do it. We want to thank Minor Mike
Speaker 1: for that. It is incredibly generous. We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: And he's matching tips on all platforms. So if you
Speaker 1: want to donate on rumble, zell Ap or subscribe on
Speaker 1: kick that'll be counted towards it. We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Thank you very very much, Minor Mike. As I said
Speaker 1: this from the Wall Street Journal, why tech billionaires want
Speaker 1: bots to be your BFF in a lonely world. Elon Musk,
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg, and even Microsoft are vying for affection in
Speaker 1: the new friend economy, and the world gets more and
Speaker 1: more lonely, more and more deracinated. People are detached from
Speaker 1: each other. They're atomized. Society is very lonely, more lonely
Speaker 1: than it has ever been before.
Speaker 2: The funny thing is, I wouldn't want to be friends
Speaker 2: with Musk or Zuckerberg or Microsoft CEO, let alone these
Speaker 2: soulless machines they create.
Speaker 1: Honestly, the machines might be better friends than Mark Zuckerberger, Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: If those are your options, maybe the AI is the
Speaker 1: better choice. But society is struggling with a loneliness problem.
Speaker 1: It is gotten especially bad after Donald Trump locked us
Speaker 1: down with COVID. People were stuck inside their houses. They
Speaker 1: isolated themselves, especially the younger generation. They don't know how
Speaker 1: to make friends, They don't know how to interact with people.
Speaker 1: I think I've mentioned this before, but there's basically an
Speaker 1: entire economy on YouTube built around discussing loneliness. There's certain
Speaker 1: channels where all they do is discuss how sad and
Speaker 1: bad their life is, how nothing has ever gone right
Speaker 1: for them, how they don't have any friends, how it's
Speaker 1: just them, how alone they are. Occasionally, one of these videos,
Speaker 1: will you know, somehow reach my algorithm, and I think
Speaker 1: it's because I'll watch them and just because I feel
Speaker 1: so sad for these people, and it's it's heart braking
Speaker 1: to see. There's a one that comes to my mind
Speaker 1: fairly frequently now, came across my feed, probably in December
Speaker 1: or something like that, and it was just this young man.
Speaker 1: He couldn't have been more than eighteen, and he's wearing
Speaker 1: a mask so you can't see him. You don't know
Speaker 1: what he looks like. But he talks about how he
Speaker 1: doesn't have any friends, how he never made any friends,
Speaker 1: how ugly and unpleasant he is to look at, how
Speaker 1: no one wants to be his friend, how he's tried
Speaker 1: and failed and nothing seems to go right for him.
Speaker 1: And it is so incredibly sad to see that this
Speaker 1: is becoming more common, This is an issue with modernity,
Speaker 1: and I feel so incredibly sad for these people. It's funny,
Speaker 1: we were homeschooled growing up, and we had so many
Speaker 1: people ask our parents, well, aren't you worried they're not
Speaker 1: going to be socialized. Aren't you worried that? You know,
Speaker 1: they're not going to know how to make friends or
Speaker 1: meet people. But we had a lot of friends. We
Speaker 1: went to church, you hung out with friend groups there,
Speaker 1: and we never had that issue. But these kids in
Speaker 1: public school are becoming completely and utterly isolated. Their only
Speaker 1: connection is to the phone, to their screen, and that's
Speaker 1: not a real connection. They don't talk to people, they
Speaker 1: don't know anyone. I feel incredibly sad for them. Big
Speaker 1: data centers are booming, but secret deals draw local opposition.
Speaker 1: That's right, and of course the BBB wants to make
Speaker 1: sure that you can't do anything about it. All regulation
Speaker 1: of AI data centers will be at the federal level.
Speaker 1: You will have no say in it. Should organ New
Speaker 1: England to do. Mexico data center projects are drawing opposition
Speaker 1: in local government hearings by residents concerned about the voracious
Speaker 1: demand for electricity, water consumption, and noise. Critics also argue
Speaker 1: that data centers don't produce the jobs other land uses generate.
Speaker 1: In Texas, people in small towns question data center development
Speaker 1: and the broader context of rapid rural industrialization. That's right.
Speaker 1: They're going to throw these massive data centers up and
Speaker 1: they're going to be I sores. They're going to be giant,
Speaker 1: blocky buildings, and they're not going to care where they
Speaker 1: put them up. It's going to be what's most efficient.
Speaker 2: Isores that consume massive amounts of water and power and
Speaker 2: are fire hazards.
Speaker 1: It's going to be another giant windmill type of scenario.
Speaker 1: These things are going to be incredibly unpleasant for the
Speaker 1: people that live near them. Pennsylvania ad hoc groups say
Speaker 1: data centers are tapping into nearby natural gas fields, increasing
Speaker 1: the frequency of fracking and straining water supplies. And of
Speaker 1: course we've seen how fracking can cause issues with water supplies.
Speaker 1: It can pollute them, it can make them flammable, can
Speaker 1: make it undrinkable. In Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and across
Speaker 1: the country, residents say the scale and proximity of these
Speaker 1: high tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties because
Speaker 1: they're going to be, as I said, giant eye sores.
Speaker 1: Who knows what other issues that we haven't even thought
Speaker 1: of yet are going to come with them. There's already
Speaker 1: causing power issues, water issues. But this is just the
Speaker 1: opening salvo. Residents say the scale and proximity of these
Speaker 1: high tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties. Objections
Speaker 1: vary depending on proposal and site, but a common complaint
Speaker 1: is state in local governments offering data center projects tax
Speaker 1: incentives that are often shielded from public scrutiny through none
Speaker 1: on disclosure agreements. That's right, you don't even get to
Speaker 1: know what deals are being made, why they're being and
Speaker 1: how they're being incentivized to build there. Oh, it's going
Speaker 1: to be good for the economy, isn't it. It's going
Speaker 1: to bolster the local economy. It's going to bring jobs
Speaker 1: in not many though. It's not going to take a
Speaker 1: lot of people to maintain these facilities. It's going to
Speaker 1: take up a lot of space, it's going to use
Speaker 1: up a lot of electricity, and you're going to get
Speaker 1: almost nothing for it. Much of this local opposition appears
Speaker 1: rooted in the complaint that people weren't informed to begin with,
Speaker 1: were ignored at some point. Of course, that's the hallmark
Speaker 1: of government in twenty first century. They don't inform you,
Speaker 1: they don't give you any details. You're supposed to shut
Speaker 1: up and do what they say. Wernamont, who co authored
Speaker 1: a February Hosting Advice dot com survey. The survey of
Speaker 1: eight hundred people in sixteen s eight's found that ninety
Speaker 1: three percent agreed that cutting edge AI data centers are
Speaker 1: vital to the United States, but only thirty five percent
Speaker 1: want one in their town. That's right, we got to
Speaker 1: have it, but I don't want it nearby. Like with
Speaker 1: everything we work on, it's always larger corporations and large
Speaker 1: industries that come into rural communities and think they can
Speaker 1: just do whatever they want, of course, and get a
Speaker 1: massive government subsidy about it. To boot, not only are
Speaker 1: they going to destroy your community, the government will pay
Speaker 1: them to do it. Texans in Granbury say, working class
Speaker 1: residents living next to giant, loud, environmentally destructive data centers
Speaker 1: are the ones paying the price for Texas's crypto boom.
Speaker 1: Minnesota's call on state legislators to impose more restrictions because
Speaker 1: these developments are reshaping our communities. But of course Trump
Speaker 1: wants to shut that down. The BBB, as I said,
Speaker 1: we'll make sure that there's nothing you can do about it.
Speaker 1: There will be no recourse. The government at the federal
Speaker 1: level will decide where these go. And it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: if it destroys your property values, it doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: it's an eesore, if it's obnoxious, if it's lowed, you'll
Speaker 1: just have to deal with it. There'll be nothing anyone
Speaker 1: can do.
Speaker 2: There's also another matter that I saw and how these
Speaker 2: particular AI data centers are worse than standard data centers
Speaker 2: because standard data centers will try and offload as much
Speaker 2: of the processing power that they can to late at
Speaker 2: night and off times, whereas AI the demand is when
Speaker 2: people are using it, which is the middle of the day,
Speaker 2: so it's much more fluctuation in the amount of power
Speaker 2: that it needs, which causes the grid to be more unstable.
Speaker 2: More fluctuation in the grid causes your appliances to wear out.
Speaker 1: Faster, more cost on the average American. The thirty five
Speaker 1: hundred members of the stop Duneland and Valpost slash Wheeler
Speaker 1: data Centers Facebook group in Indiana express frustration that a
Speaker 1: planning commission has threatened to waive public hearings on a
Speaker 1: proposed data center. Page's rife with comments such as we
Speaker 1: have no voice anymore. Seems like that's a dictatorship in
Speaker 1: my opinion. Now you're getting the idea data centers are
Speaker 1: eligible for tax incentives and other inducements. Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 1: According to a fifty state survey by land use saw
Speaker 1: firm Hush Blackwell, thirty six states have some kind of
Speaker 1: legislation authorizing tax incentives for new data center development, with
Speaker 1: no standard template for how incentives are structured. The most
Speaker 1: popular tool developer seek is a sales tax and use
Speaker 1: tax exemption, he said, because the tremendous amount of servers,
Speaker 1: the brain stem of the data center where all the
Speaker 1: action happens, must be refreshed every three to five years.
Speaker 1: That's right, you're going to be subsidizing these big corporations,
Speaker 1: Boss said. Washington State offers a sales tax exemption for
Speaker 1: data centers with the center's pay property taxes and utility taxes.
Speaker 1: We've got a new high school, new hospital, new indoor
Speaker 1: u sports stadium, the property taxing districts in our area
Speaker 1: going fairly well, he said. American people subsidizing these massive
Speaker 1: data an analysis groups. It'll be used eventually against them
Speaker 1: paying for our own enslavement. Isn't that wonderful Reason magazine
Speaker 1: article that data centers are the new stadium scam, which
Speaker 1: with cities and counties giving developers sweetheart deals that don't
Speaker 1: deliver benefits for taxpayers. Of course, by stadium scam, they
Speaker 1: mean the fact that these teams, whether football or basketball
Speaker 1: or whatever, will come in and say, hey, we would
Speaker 1: like to build in your area. You know, it'll bring
Speaker 1: money in, it will generate a lot of revenue for you.
Speaker 1: Just you know, we don't want to have to pay
Speaker 1: to build the stadium ourselves, so the local governments will
Speaker 1: do that. The taxpayers will finance it. They'll be millions
Speaker 1: or billions of dollars, and the team gets it for free.
Speaker 1: The multi millionaire or billionaire who owns it doesn't have
Speaker 1: to pay out of pocket to build the stadium. It's
Speaker 1: all subsidized by the taxpayers. The data centered grid up
Speaker 1: grades are now a line item in statewide electric rate
Speaker 1: hikes tax increment financing programs in which property taxes and
Speaker 1: other tax revenues are funneled into a community development redevelopment
Speaker 1: district rather than into a municipality's general fund. Isn't that
Speaker 1: wonderful today's stadium boondoggle? Is a server farm, shinier, techier,
Speaker 1: but often just as bad for taxpayers. That's right, shiny
Speaker 1: and wonderful and a giant waste of money that we're
Speaker 1: all footing the bill for. Controversy erupts as scientists start
Speaker 1: work to create artificial human DNA. That's right, they're playing god.
Speaker 1: They're going to create artificial human DNA. While some scientists
Speaker 1: believe the project could lead to advancement in medicine and biotechnology,
Speaker 1: others express concerns about the potential risks and ethical implications.
Speaker 1: Some only some are concerned about this. You'd think this
Speaker 1: is how we've ended up in the position we're in.
Speaker 1: These scientists that people trust so much because they show
Speaker 1: up in white lab coats that give them authority, have
Speaker 1: no concern for this kind of thing. They don't care.
Speaker 1: They're simply interested in what they can achieve, if they
Speaker 1: should achieve it. To paraphrase Jurassic Park. The Synthetic Human
Speaker 1: Genome project is being funded by the Welcome Trust, which
Speaker 1: has donated Rs seven crore ten million pounds. Of course,
Speaker 1: the Welcome To Trust has some interesting characters attached to it.
Speaker 1: There's Julia Gillard. She's the former Australian Prime Minister, so
Speaker 1: tied into government. There Sir William Castwell, the former ge
Speaker 1: Healthcare Executive and b P director, Sir Mark Walport, he
Speaker 1: was the CEO from twenty thirty to twenty thirteen, later
Speaker 1: the UK Chief UK Government Chief Scientific Advisor. And there's
Speaker 1: when it comes to scientific directors, Dame Bridget Ogilvie and
Speaker 1: she has ties to Astrazenica. Isn't that wonderful. I'm sure
Speaker 1: these people have our best interests at heart. They're not
Speaker 1: at all suspicious. No one you should be concerned about.
Speaker 1: Scientists have begun to work on a controversial project that
Speaker 1: aims to create human DNA from scratch. The world's largest
Speaker 1: medical charity, the Welcome Trust, has donated ten million pounds
Speaker 1: to start the project, which involves scientists from universities including Oxford, Cambridge,
Speaker 1: an Imperial College. The Imperial College of course, being the idiots,
Speaker 1: I couldn't put together a simulation when it came to
Speaker 1: the COVID pandemic. It would just give a random output.
Speaker 1: You could put in the same data and it would
Speaker 1: never give you the same the same response twice. It
Speaker 1: was simply making stuff up. Scientists involved in the Synthetic
Speaker 1: Human Genome Project are now attempting to create a fully
Speaker 1: synthetic human chromosome, picking up about two percent of human
Speaker 1: DNA as proof of concept. The ultimate aim is to
Speaker 1: maybe one day create all of it from scratch program
Speaker 1: synthetic humans. Won't that be wonderful? The sky is the limit.
Speaker 1: We're looking at therapies that will improve people's lives as
Speaker 1: they age, that will lead to healthier aging with less
Speaker 1: disease as they get older. I'm sure it won't do
Speaker 1: exactly the opposite of that. I'm sure it won't result
Speaker 1: in horrific consequences. We're looking to use this approach to
Speaker 1: generate disease resists stant cells we can use to repopulate
Speaker 1: damaged organs, repopulate or depopulate. I think we know what
Speaker 1: the answer will eventually be. However, not everyone is seemingly
Speaker 1: convinced by the idea of humans playing gods. Professor Bill Earnshaw,
Speaker 1: genetic scientists at Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, of course, being the
Speaker 1: people that called out the Imperial College and exposed their
Speaker 1: incompetence or malevolence, so the technology could be commercialized quickly
Speaker 1: by healthcare companies. The Genie is out of the bottle.
Speaker 1: We could have set restrictions now. We could have a
Speaker 1: set of restrictions now. But if an organization who has
Speaker 1: access to appropriate machinery decided to start synthesizing anything, I
Speaker 1: don't think we could stop them. Doctor Pat Thomas, director
Speaker 1: of the campaign group Beyond GM, said, even though scientists
Speaker 1: are there to work for the good of humans, the
Speaker 1: project may cause harm. I think doctor Pat Thomas may
Speaker 1: be overly sanguine when it comes to the motivations of scientists.
Speaker 1: I think they're mostly there for self aggrandizement, to see
Speaker 1: what is they can accomplish. I don't think they care
Speaker 1: too much about the good of humanity. I think it's
Speaker 1: mostly for their own ego.
Speaker 2: It's mostly for a paycheck.
Speaker 1: Ego and paycheck. We like to think that all scientists
Speaker 1: are there to do good, but the science can be
Speaker 1: repurposed to do harm and for warfare, said doctor Thomas.
Speaker 1: And again, I think, as I said, he's overly sanguine.
Speaker 1: Reacting to the news, a section of social media users
Speaker 1: said the experiments could go wrong, while others expressed optimism
Speaker 1: that it could lead to a better quality of life
Speaker 1: for people. It's amazing that there's still so many people
Speaker 1: who just go, well, golly gee, it's gonna be a
Speaker 1: We're gonna live in a paradise. Guys. It's gonna be wonderful.
Speaker 1: These multi billionaires in these corporations, they love us so much, suckers.
Speaker 1: There's one born every minute.
Speaker 2: So I have all these hunter killer drones that look,
Speaker 2: this can go over any kind of terrain, and then
Speaker 2: they'll immediately say, this can be used to help survivors
Speaker 2: in a disaster, help cape them. We can track them
Speaker 2: down with these things and point our gun shaped cameras
Speaker 2: at them.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 2: Rescuers will know where they.
Speaker 1: Are exactly its own. It's it's not going to be
Speaker 1: used for warfare. It's going to be used to help
Speaker 1: search and rescue corporate grown employees coming soon. What a
Speaker 1: wonderful world we live in, said one user. That's right,
Speaker 1: they're going to breed the perfect little worker drone. They're
Speaker 1: going to make sure that it doesn't have any thoughts
Speaker 1: or free will. Again, I would be very surprised if
Speaker 1: they manage to create a human. I do not believe
Speaker 1: they have that capability, but I'm sure that it can
Speaker 1: result in some truly horrific consequences for us. That's the
Speaker 1: end of our AI segment for today. It has been
Speaker 1: a it's been something. The horrors persist, but so do we.
Speaker 1: As I've said before, Minor Mike is matching tips today
Speaker 1: on all platforms. So if you would like to help
Speaker 1: us get across the finish line, today is a great
Speaker 1: day to do it. We are at about seventy five
Speaker 1: percent on the gas gage and it is because of
Speaker 1: your support that we have reached that. But we really
Speaker 1: would appreciate if you can afford it. If it's within
Speaker 1: your budget, today would be the perfect time to donate.
Speaker 1: Got some comments and some tips here, Stealth Patriot, thank
Speaker 1: you very much for the tip. That is very kind.
Speaker 1: Zion is trying to help the Jews rebuild the templar,
Speaker 1: trying to force prophecy. The fulfillment is the deception. The
Speaker 1: body is the temple, and to bring about an old
Speaker 1: system is a denial of Christ. That's right. The Jews
Speaker 1: utterly reject Christ. They refuse to see the fulfillment of
Speaker 1: prophecy that was his life and death. It is completely
Speaker 1: and utterly obvious in the Old Testament, and yet they
Speaker 1: still utterly refuse to engage with it. It is a
Speaker 1: massive blind spot of theirs. Knights of the storm. Forcing
Speaker 1: data centers on in towns I don't want them, will
Speaker 1: stress their resources and basically provide no jobs. That's right.
Speaker 1: There's not going to be many people that will work
Speaker 1: in the data centers, and almost guaranteed they're not going
Speaker 1: to be hired from within the town itself. They will
Speaker 1: import someone who has a specialty in these things. They'll
Speaker 1: bring someone over who's going to work at a very
Speaker 1: reduced rate, possibly from India because they specialize in that
Speaker 1: kind of thing, shipping out workers.
Speaker 2: Also, these data centers just don't hire many people, period
Speaker 2: and they're massive in terms of the amount of money
Speaker 2: it takes to build them, the amount of energy that
Speaker 2: they take, the amount of water, But personnel is where
Speaker 2: they're light on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you don't need too many people to keep these
Speaker 1: up and running. And of course, as I said, the
Speaker 1: people you do need are specialized. They need to have
Speaker 1: a specific skill set to the storm. My solution was
Speaker 1: for states refuse to hand over land for them, but
Speaker 1: they have thought of that too and are going to
Speaker 1: force it. That's right. Are going to make sure that
Speaker 1: you have no say in it. The BBB will ensure that.
Speaker 1: Briana de McCartney, friend of Virginia, says, the data centers
Speaker 1: are completely taking over her area. They're going in everywhere.
Speaker 1: They are going to be the next boon doggle, the
Speaker 1: next stadium scam and to the store. Remember how crypto
Speaker 1: was demonized for power requirements. AI and data storage centers
Speaker 1: are different. How that's right. Crypto requires too much energy,
Speaker 1: it's a boondoggle, it's too expensive. But the data centers, well,
Speaker 1: you know, they provide real resources, like you know, your
Speaker 1: data to the government.
Speaker 2: Well, the difference is this is real helpful for implementing
Speaker 2: their agendas. So therefore the mcguffin doesn't apply to it.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Got to comment about Thomas Massey Star Barkley, and
Speaker 1: it makes it more popular. Every hit on Trump made
Speaker 1: it more popular. You think he considered that. That's right.
Speaker 1: The people like Thomas Massey because he takes principled stands
Speaker 1: like this, because he will point out that this sort
Speaker 1: of thing is unconstitutional. And Donald Trump throwing a temper
Speaker 1: tantrum and screeching about Thomas Massey only makes him more popular.
Speaker 1: People only like him more for it because they can
Speaker 1: see that he's right, that Thomas Massey is correct. This
Speaker 1: is unconstitutional. Donald Trump has no authority to do this.
Speaker 2: It's all want an outsider. As more and more have
Speaker 2: seen Trump's opinions on everything be considered mainline Republicanism, and
Speaker 2: you want a Republican if you disagree with Trump on anything.
Speaker 2: Having Massey be a voice of dissent is going to
Speaker 2: attract a lot of attention from people that are looking
Speaker 2: for any alternative.
Speaker 1: Nights of the storm? Does synthetic DNA include all the
Speaker 1: junk DNA that we still don't know what it's for.
Speaker 1: That's right, Well, they're just gonna cut that out. It's junk,
Speaker 1: don't need that, get rid of it. There's a very
Speaker 1: wise saying says if you don't know what something is,
Speaker 1: you don't have the authority to remove it. If you
Speaker 1: cannot think of the possible use case for something, then
Speaker 1: you shouldn't try to get rid of it because chances
Speaker 1: are it was put there by someone for a reason.
Speaker 1: It's there to do something specific, and if you don't
Speaker 1: understand why and what it's for, you shouldn't mess with it.
Speaker 1: But these people don't abide by that. They assume that
Speaker 1: they're the most intelligent people that have ever lived. They
Speaker 1: understand everything they need to and that if they can't
Speaker 1: figure out what it's there for, it doesn't need to
Speaker 1: be there because it obviously doesn't serve a purpose. Dustin d. Hilm,
Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary Basint says crypto stable coin legislation could be
Speaker 1: finalized by mid July. I bet we get CBDC by
Speaker 1: end of the year. They're really pushing it. They want
Speaker 1: to be able to track and trace everything everyone does.
Speaker 1: Every single purchase will be tracked and traced. You will
Speaker 1: have no privacy. They will know everything, and they'll be
Speaker 1: able to freeze your accounts or just flat out delete
Speaker 1: all your money. We live in scary times. Cabos eight
Speaker 1: eight eight. Scientists providing the results to those who provide
Speaker 1: them the money. That's right. That has been a known
Speaker 1: issue for years, but most people refuse to engage with
Speaker 1: that line of thought. Who funds the study? What were
Speaker 1: they trying to achieve? If you can skew, you can
Speaker 1: skew studies very easily. It makes it very difficult to
Speaker 1: get accurate data because most of these companies are looking
Speaker 1: for a specific result. Torinator, thank you for the tip Tornator,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. I sent twenty dollars on Zell. I hope
Speaker 1: everyone has a good week. Yes, And of course Minor
Speaker 1: Mike is matching tips today. We really do appreciate him
Speaker 1: doing that, so all tips on all platforms will be
Speaker 1: match We're going to take a quick break and we
Speaker 1: will be right b.
Speaker 7: After you're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, folks, thank you for still being here with us.
Speaker 1: As I said when we went to break, Minor Mike
Speaker 1: is matching tips today, and we really do appreciate We
Speaker 1: thank him so much for that, and we thank you
Speaker 1: all for your kindness and generosity. It is truly wonderful
Speaker 1: to see. We really do appreciate it. Junk Silver, thank
Speaker 1: you so much. Thank you. And I'm going to now
Speaker 1: just quickly remind you that there are other ways to
Speaker 1: support the show. If you aren't feeling like donating something directly,
Speaker 1: you can go to our website. We've got multiple different
Speaker 1: products there, the newest one being this fancy coin that
Speaker 1: Jason Barker of Knights of the Storm put together. It's
Speaker 1: got the chest headpiece on one side, you can see
Speaker 1: it there, and it has the it has the microphone
Speaker 1: on the other It is a very nice piece. It
Speaker 1: looks really wonderful. It has a brassy finish on it.
Speaker 1: It looks fantastic. There's also, of course David Knight dot Gold.
Speaker 1: Tony Ardeburn set that up to let him know you
Speaker 1: came through us. And Tony Ardeburn has wolf Pack, which
Speaker 1: is a subscription service and you can sign up and
Speaker 1: he will ship you gold and silver depending on the
Speaker 1: options you choose. There are multiple tiers there as well.
Speaker 1: You can work with Tony and find one that will
Speaker 1: allow you to start accumulating some gold and silver. There's
Speaker 1: also trends Journal dot com and with promo code Night,
Speaker 1: you get ten percent off works out to be about
Speaker 1: two dollars and fifty cents a week, which is an
Speaker 1: incredible deal. Can't get a cup of coffee for two
Speaker 1: dollars and fifty cents. In fact, I'd be curious as
Speaker 1: to what you could get for that. Maybe one day
Speaker 1: I'll go to McDonald's and see what I can get
Speaker 1: for two dollars and fifty cents and bring it back
Speaker 1: to show you all the value you're getting. And there's
Speaker 1: also urnc Store dot com promo cod Night for ten
Speaker 1: percent off. You can start taking control of your health.
Speaker 1: See if some of their products might be helpful for
Speaker 1: whatever you're struggling with medically. Might be a good way
Speaker 1: to get outside the medical industrial complex, might be useful
Speaker 1: to you from a code Night for ten percent off.
Speaker 1: And there's also Homestead Products dot Schhop. They've got a
Speaker 1: lot of high quality, handmade, made America products there. Non
Speaker 1: GMO got some new ones to show off right now.
Speaker 1: These are freeze dried raw chicken egg This is freeze
Speaker 1: r raw chicken egg powder, organically produced Non Gomo Pasture ray.
Speaker 1: The ingredients are pure uncooked egg. One egg equals one
Speaker 1: tablespoonful dry egg powder plus two tablespoons of water. But
Speaker 1: they say some people prefer a two to two powdered
Speaker 1: to water ratio, so equal parts. You add the ingredients ingredients,
Speaker 1: let them sit for a few minutes, stir and cook,
Speaker 1: or add to a recipe. And this bag has the
Speaker 1: equivalent of eighteen eggs inside it. And of course freeze
Speaker 1: freeze dried food lasts a very long time. It keeps
Speaker 1: for quite a while. We also have sun dried chives,
Speaker 1: and of course chives are very flavorful. They make a
Speaker 1: nice garnish and topping on things. They give good flavor.
Speaker 1: So Homestead Products dot Shop ten percent off with promo
Speaker 1: code night see if some of their products are something
Speaker 1: that might be interesting to you, might help you. They
Speaker 1: have a lot of different ones, so we really do
Speaker 1: thank you all for your support, and we thank Minor
Speaker 1: Mic for matching tips.
Speaker 3: Today.
Speaker 1: We're gonna look at this article now send it. Reconciliation
Speaker 1: Bill could add over four trillion dollars to the debt.
Speaker 1: As it currently stands, the Senate Reconciliation Bill is likely
Speaker 1: to add three point five to four point two trillion
Speaker 1: to the debt through the fiscal year twenty thirty four.
Speaker 1: Based on our estimates, the debt impact could rise as
Speaker 1: high as four and a half trillion if various rumored
Speaker 1: adjustments are made. That's five hundred billion to one point
Speaker 1: five trillion more in borrowing than under the House past bill.
Speaker 1: And of course they always under report how much this
Speaker 1: is going to cost. They always give you a low
Speaker 1: ball number. And if this is what they're admitting to,
Speaker 1: who knows how much it will actually cost. And of
Speaker 1: course you have to remember that Trump bankrupted about half
Speaker 1: a dozen casinos. He's not good with managing money. He
Speaker 1: doesn't really seem to get it. He has no interest
Speaker 1: in balancing the budget. The Senate bill would also significantly
Speaker 1: boost debt as a percentage of the economy from about
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of output today to between one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty five one hundred twenty eight percent of GDP. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, isn't that wonderful one hundred and twenty five
Speaker 1: to one hundred and twenty eight percent of the gross
Speaker 1: domestic product. I'm sure we'll be able to pay it back.
Speaker 1: This from ABC News. Trump Admin Live updates. Senate begins
Speaker 1: debate on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Senate on Sunday afternoon
Speaker 1: began debate on President Trump's megabill for a second term priorities.
Speaker 1: After a dramatic procedural vote late Sunday night. Dramatic procedural
Speaker 1: vote words that probably have never been said before and
Speaker 1: may never be set again. Dramatic and procedural. Likely in
Speaker 1: the early hours of Monday, Senators will begin offering amendments
Speaker 1: to the bill. Overnight Sunday, the Senate Parliamentarian ruled more
Speaker 1: provisions out of order with the reconciliation process Publicans are
Speaker 1: using to pass the bill with a simple majority. If
Speaker 1: it passes in the Senate, the bill goes back to
Speaker 1: the House to consider changes the Senate made to the
Speaker 1: House's version of the bill, which passed by one vote.
Speaker 1: As a Senate Fish began debating the Big Beautiful Bill.
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump took his social media platform on Sunday
Speaker 1: took to a social media platform on Sunday advising Republican
Speaker 1: centers not to go too crazy, suggesting that they still
Speaker 1: need to be reelected. For all cost cutting Republicans of
Speaker 1: which I am one, remember, you still have to get
Speaker 1: re elected. That's right, our cost cutting president. That's going
Speaker 1: to add four and a half trillion to the debt.
Speaker 1: That's what I call cost cutting. And of course, as
Speaker 1: I stated at the beginning of the show, Musk is
Speaker 1: back on the attack. He doesn't like the bill. Muskrenews
Speaker 1: attacks on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, says it will destroy
Speaker 1: millions of jobs. It's incredible. He's actually right on this.
Speaker 1: He might be a scammer when it comes to Tesla,
Speaker 1: but somehow he's got this one correct. Billionaire Elon Musk
Speaker 1: on Saturday double down on his distaste for President Trump's
Speaker 1: sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that
Speaker 1: Republican Senators are SCRAMed to pass would kill jobs and
Speaker 1: bog down burgeoning industries. The latest Senate draft bill will
Speaker 1: destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic
Speaker 1: harm to our country, Musk wrote on X. The Tesla
Speaker 1: and SpaceX ceo later posted that the bill would be
Speaker 1: political suicide for the Republican Party. That's right. They're supposed
Speaker 1: to be the party of fiscal conservatism. That's how they've
Speaker 1: build themselves for years. Well, we're the party that will
Speaker 1: cut taxes and balance the budget. But that's not true.
Speaker 1: They've given that up.
Speaker 2: Trump's platform of cutting taxes and not going to war
Speaker 2: has proven to be less than he promised.
Speaker 1: Uh huh, we're going to cut taxes, we're gonna balance
Speaker 1: the budget, we're going to reduce spending, we're not going
Speaker 1: to war. I think we're zero for all of those.
Speaker 1: I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly,
Speaker 1: which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases. It undermines
Speaker 1: the work that the dog team is doing. Musk told
Speaker 1: C I think a bill can be big or it
Speaker 1: can be beautiful. Musk added, but I don't know it
Speaker 1: can be both. My personal opinion, he's one hundred percent
Speaker 1: right on this, as I said at the beginning of the
Speaker 1: Omnibus is one thousand pages. No one is going to
Speaker 1: read that takes about sixteen hours. Of course, Trump was
Speaker 1: a New York Democrat for years. It was simply a
Speaker 1: matter of convenience for him to run as a Republican,
Speaker 1: he wrote an extra earlier this month another post, wealthy
Speaker 1: GOP donor, who had recently forecasted that he'd stepped back
Speaker 1: from political donations, threatened to fire lawmakers who betrayed the
Speaker 1: American people. When mister Trump clapped back to say he
Speaker 1: was disappointed with Musk, back and forth fighting erupted and
Speaker 1: quickly escalated. Musk suggested without evidence that mister Trump, who
Speaker 1: spent the first part of the year as one of
Speaker 1: his close sallies, was mentioned in files related to sex
Speaker 1: abuser Jeffrey Epstein. The president also threatened to cut off
Speaker 1: federal subsidies and contracts to Elon. Musk company SpaceX receives
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars in federal money goes to
Speaker 1: which are in the form of federal grants from NASA.
Speaker 1: He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot
Speaker 1: of subsidy, mister Trump told reporters on June six, So
Speaker 1: take a look at that only if it's fair for
Speaker 1: him and for the country. I would certainly think about it,
Speaker 1: but it has to be fair. Musk ultimately tried to
Speaker 1: make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of
Speaker 1: his posts that went too far. Trump responded a kind
Speaker 1: in an interview in The New York Post, saying things
Speaker 1: like that happen. I don't blame him for anything. That's right.
Speaker 1: You occasionally just accuse your friend of being a sexual deviant,
Speaker 1: a pedophile. You occasionally just have these kinds of spats
Speaker 1: with friends. The shocking rift came after must donated two
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy seven million dollars to mister Trump's presidential campaign,
Speaker 1: not the Republican candidates in the last selection cycle, according
Speaker 1: to campaign finance records. This is from Politico. He's going
Speaker 1: to do everything to damage the president. Former Musk friend
Speaker 1: on the Trump fallout. That's right. The spat is back on.
Speaker 1: A former longtime friend of Elon Musk has a word
Speaker 1: of caution for President Donald Trump about the tech mogul.
Speaker 1: He doesn't really move on. He fixates, apparently. Philip Lowe,
Speaker 1: an award winning neuroscientists who partnered with a late legendary
Speaker 1: cosmologist Stephen Hawking as a test subject, learned that the
Speaker 1: hard way in twenty twenty one when he fired Musk,
Speaker 1: one of his early investors, from the advisory board of
Speaker 1: the Silicon Valley startup he founded. Over an hour long interview,
Speaker 1: Low weaved something of a psychological portrait of his former advisor,
Speaker 1: casting him as obsessive, prone to seeking revenge, power, hungry,
Speaker 1: and in constant search of dominance? Is he talking about
Speaker 1: Musk or Trump? Here? So hard to tell between these billionaires.
Speaker 1: They all seem to share a very similar psychological profile.
Speaker 2: It's a shame they're fighting. There's so much alike.
Speaker 1: Exactly, they made such a nice couple, two meglomaniacs. He suggested.
Speaker 1: Musk aims to explore every available avenue to establish competition
Speaker 1: with and ultimately over shadow bitter rivals. Low has known
Speaker 1: him for fourteen years, but doesn't believe Musk has matured
Speaker 1: over time. He's convinced he never will. That's right, These billionaires.
Speaker 1: They don't have to mature. They have enough money to
Speaker 1: do whatever they want. Musk and Donald Trump were both
Speaker 1: born into extremely wealthy families. They never really had to
Speaker 1: experience the real world. They never had to experience people
Speaker 1: not bowing and scraping to them, not giving them exactly
Speaker 1: what they wanted. It breeds a very specific type of
Speaker 1: unstable individual. After Low fired him, Low felt that Musk
Speaker 1: carried a grudge and their bond was permanently altered. It
Speaker 1: finally snapped in January, when Low joined other critics and
Speaker 1: acusing the billionaire in social media performing Nazi salutes at
Speaker 1: Trump's inaugural rally. Musk brushed off the public backlash as
Speaker 1: so tired, uh throw in romans. I've had my share
Speaker 1: of blowouts with Elan over the years, Low told Politico
Speaker 1: in a rare interview. Since Musk's ugly spat with Trump,
Speaker 1: knowing Elon the way I know him, I do think
Speaker 1: he's doing He's going to do everything to damage the president. Below,
Speaker 1: who considered himself himself a political independent, said that Trump
Speaker 1: and the American public shouldn't be fooled. Simply put, any
Speaker 1: reconciliation with Musk will be purely cosmetic and transactional. He
Speaker 1: has been humiliated low forty five set of his old friend.
Speaker 1: The whole idea that Elon is going to be on
Speaker 1: his side and help woo Congress and invest in election
Speaker 1: campaigns for right wing judges. Elon might do all of that,
Speaker 1: but deep down it's over. That's right, it's over. Friendship
Speaker 1: ended with Donald Trump. Sad to see the Meglomenanian The
Speaker 1: Meglomaniacs are fighting again Audi Mr R. Trump's bill also
Speaker 1: includes federal immunity for law enforcement all over the country.
Speaker 1: It also punishes whistleblowers and resolves the dj AT pursuing
Speaker 1: civil rights claims. The bill is a nightmare. It is
Speaker 1: one thousand pages. There's all kinds of things buried in
Speaker 1: there that are going to do harm to the American public.
Speaker 1: It's not simply enough that they will add four n
Speaker 1: aftillion dollars to the debt. They're directly going after our
Speaker 1: rights and freedoms.
Speaker 2: There's a video in the deck of Mike Johnson talking
Speaker 2: about exactly that. It's a four minute long video, and
Speaker 2: the part where he's talking about that is at the end,
Speaker 2: but he's saying how it's beneficial for us to do
Speaker 2: this because you know the Democrats are going to impose
Speaker 2: us on each individual point, so we got to put
Speaker 2: them all together in one big bill to get it through.
Speaker 1: That's your job, mister Johnson, to fight with the Democrats.
Speaker 1: That's within your job description. That's what you're hired by
Speaker 1: the American people to do. If they want something, you're
Speaker 1: supposed to sit there and argue about it. Oh, don't
Speaker 1: make me, don't make me work, don't make me do it.
Speaker 1: These people they sit there and they their payments. They
Speaker 1: get massively wealthy somehow, despite the fact that the salaries
Speaker 1: don't seem to add up, and they do it by
Speaker 1: selling out the American people over and over again. This
Speaker 1: is no different. This is more of the same, except
Speaker 1: it's just larger. Elon Musk rips into utterly insane Trump
Speaker 1: backed megabill. That's right. Utterly insane is a direct quote
Speaker 1: he is. He's got some heavy criticism of this disgusting boondoggle.
Speaker 1: But that's enough about Elon Musk for now. He's an
Speaker 1: interesting character. Manu Raju asked up senators about voting on
Speaker 1: big beautiful bill texts they haven't read yet. We know
Speaker 1: where we are going and of course remember when they
Speaker 1: made fun of the Democrats for their whole Well, we've
Speaker 1: got to pass it to find out what's in it.
Speaker 8: Bit.
Speaker 1: CNN Chief Congressional Correspondent Manur Raju spoke with several Republican
Speaker 1: lawmakers on Friday about the possibility that they would vote
Speaker 1: on the latest version of the so called Big Beautiful
Speaker 1: Bill without having had time to read the final text,
Speaker 1: something that has been a complaint from Republicans in the
Speaker 1: past about Democrats. Raju spoke with Jake Tapper on Friday
Speaker 1: as the lead about his interviews with GOP lawmakers had
Speaker 1: of the hoped for vote on the latest Senate version
Speaker 1: of the Agenda Bill from President Donald Trump, which Trump
Speaker 1: dubbed the Big Beautiful Bill, which has been subject of
Speaker 1: extensive debate and maneuvering among Republicans. Raju said to multiple
Speaker 1: GP members on Friday that the process is moving fast
Speaker 1: or that there hasn't been time to review it, asking
Speaker 1: for their explanations on how that might look to the
Speaker 1: American voters. What do you think voters say when they
Speaker 1: look at the process here as being employed to push
Speaker 1: this through and it will be voted on and people
Speaker 1: haven't even got a chance to review it, rodu said
Speaker 1: to Senator Lindsey Graham in one such interview, I don't
Speaker 1: remember the voter saying anything about Obamacare. Graham replied, you
Speaker 1: guys did, Raju said, likely referring to these strong reactions
Speaker 1: at the time to his statement by then Speaker Representative
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi. You said, up Obamacare. Have to pass the
Speaker 1: bill so you can find out what is in it.
Speaker 1: And of course that quote lived in infamy. It was
Speaker 1: something that she got made fun of and still to
Speaker 1: this day gets made fun of. Four But the Republicans
Speaker 1: were more than happy to adopt that type of mentality.
Speaker 1: We don't have to read it anymore. Oh, thank goodness.
Speaker 1: That leaves more time for doing drugs and drinking whiskey
Speaker 1: and smoking cigars in the back room. Somebody fetched me
Speaker 1: a page.
Speaker 3: Boy.
Speaker 1: Well, the process of reconciliation is a one party exercise.
Speaker 1: We've spent hours and days and weeks and months talking
Speaker 1: about this among ourselves, Graham explained, highlighting difference between those
Speaker 1: comments and the current situation. We shared it with our constituents.
Speaker 1: Is you is or is you ain't my constituency? Roger
Speaker 1: pressed on, though, asking Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio about
Speaker 1: it as well, and getting similar explanation, highlighting the contents
Speaker 1: of the bill are well discussed, even if the specific
Speaker 1: language hasn't been printed out yet. I've never discussed things
Speaker 1: so many times as we've discussed the exact same thing.
Speaker 1: Moreno said, final text is not out, but we know
Speaker 1: where we are going directionally. The devil is in the details, folks.
Speaker 1: These broad strokes mean nothing. Raju also spoke with the
Speaker 1: Republican Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, who defended the
Speaker 1: overall process and said at the normal period, a public
Speaker 1: review would be observed. Johnson defends process, cutting deals behind
Speaker 1: closed doors and rushing Trump's bill by self imposed deadline,
Speaker 1: a process Republicans have attacked in the past, and here
Speaker 1: is that, Mike Johnson clips.
Speaker 9: Still getting dune on the July four ran If numbers
Speaker 9: have non seen this final tax and achieved as that
Speaker 9: some we remembers.
Speaker 6: Don't wine, why not take the time to review it,
Speaker 6: Let the public review it.
Speaker 4: To get it right.
Speaker 10: Well, will allow at least seventy two hours, which is
Speaker 10: our normal process. As I'm retired on schools, to what
Speaker 10: certainly is a courtesy for everyone to be able to
Speaker 10: go through it.
Speaker 3: I hope we're all gone to life. I hope that.
Speaker 10: We're what we're going to receive as a product that
Speaker 10: is substantially similar to what we said over in the House,
Speaker 10: so that the review of the final product would not
Speaker 10: need a reread of a fourteen s stage piece of legislation,
Speaker 10: but the digest of the or the actual changes of
Speaker 10: the things that have been struck or added, which would be.
Speaker 3: A much smaller subset of pages. So but we'll see.
Speaker 10: I was in you know, I've been in direct contact
Speaker 10: with Leader Fods recently the last twenty minutes. We're talking
Speaker 10: about this step by step. I know where the status is,
Speaker 10: where they are, and we are awaiting. We can't make
Speaker 10: any of these final decisions until we see their if
Speaker 10: their bill, and I'm going to give all of my
Speaker 10: members plenty of time to digest that we're not the
Speaker 10: House will not be jammed by anything.
Speaker 3: I made that commitment.
Speaker 10: So I have been in time, doggingly determined to get
Speaker 10: this stun by July fourth, ass as the president.
Speaker 3: And the reason is to answer your question.
Speaker 10: Because we want to do it as soon as possible.
Speaker 3: This bill is going to see this podcast.
Speaker 10: If they're going to have a second time excuse me,
Speaker 10: and give great economic relief the American people. It will
Speaker 10: add new jobs, wages, We'll go up all the things
Speaker 10: we're talking about. The border will be secured, We'll have
Speaker 10: the border funding that we need. It will it will
Speaker 10: help us maintain this new piece through strength that is
Speaker 10: being forced around the world, all these things. The sooner
Speaker 10: we delivered that the better because everyone will benefit by it.
Speaker 3: So July fourth seemed to be the perfect day.
Speaker 10: It would be poetic to do it on Independence Day,
Speaker 10: and I certainly hope we could still do that, like
Speaker 10: ironic expect it's possible, but I don't want to even
Speaker 10: accept that as a as a as an option right now.
Speaker 3: We want to try to forge the pushes.
Speaker 11: There's so many thwarting issues though, Sarah, do you think
Speaker 11: your rank and file members are looped into this process enough?
Speaker 11: Could they be surprised by what the Senate sends them back?
Speaker 10: Well, look, I haven't slept maybe six hours this week
Speaker 10: because I've on the phone all the time with members
Speaker 10: House and Senate, working through answering their questions, making sure
Speaker 10: everyone's up to date on everything.
Speaker 3: And I no one will be surprised.
Speaker 10: Okay, as things are leaked in various journals of all
Speaker 10: of yours, then it gives me more questions to answer.
Speaker 10: So thanks a lot, but we're trying to keep everybody
Speaker 10: up to date as the news develops. This is a
Speaker 10: completely transparent process. It has been from the beginning, and
Speaker 10: we're trying to.
Speaker 1: Maintaind to you this one thousand page, sixteen hours to rebuild,
Speaker 1: so fully transparent. Monday, you're thank you.
Speaker 3: What is your cook? Maybe the weekend?
Speaker 10: I think that may still be possible, but we will
Speaker 10: bring the House members back to get this done as
Speaker 10: soon as it is possible for us to do that
Speaker 10: under the timeline. So I still want to get this
Speaker 10: done by July.
Speaker 3: Wark yesterday to think I.
Speaker 1: Said the Green tax presidents of that center are unacceptable
Speaker 1: and it.
Speaker 3: Needs to snap back to exactly where the House is.
Speaker 1: It seems like a big ask and.
Speaker 3: Something they're probably not going to be willing to do. Well.
Speaker 3: We're working through that.
Speaker 10: I mean, you know, we had, as you all know,
Speaker 10: we negotiated a very delicate balance and agreement on all
Speaker 10: of those dicey provisions. The President would like to wind
Speaker 10: down all the Green New Deal nonsense as aggressively as
Speaker 10: I would, but we have to have. Uh So we'll
Speaker 10: see where that, where that equilibrium point has reached out.
Speaker 1: I remember how Donald Trump acted as if the Paris
Speaker 1: Climate Accord was something that we had. He could have
Speaker 1: ended that immediately. He could have just said it's not constitutional,
Speaker 1: it wasn't ratified properly, he didn't have the authority, but
Speaker 1: he hung that over everyone's head. He kept holding that
Speaker 1: over people as something, Oh, I'm going to take care
Speaker 1: of this, and he waited and waited and waited. If
Speaker 1: he wants to deal with the Green New Deal, he
Speaker 1: could just do that, say it's unconstitutional, but he likes
Speaker 1: to hold these things over people's head. The Paris Climate
Speaker 1: Accord was a scam. The green energy stuff is a scam.
Speaker 1: It's obviously. So let's go back to the video. We're
Speaker 1: going to jump back to where we work there.
Speaker 10: Uh So we'll see where that, where that equilibrium point
Speaker 10: has reached out. I think we we met a satisfact,
Speaker 10: great point or negotiation for the House product, and I
Speaker 10: hope the Senate's product is as close to ours as.
Speaker 3: Trust you guys.
Speaker 9: At Washington jamming everything into a big bill and forcing
Speaker 9: it down people's throats.
Speaker 10: Well, in this case, it's a it's a great idea
Speaker 10: because the reconciliation process.
Speaker 3: Allows us to do it.
Speaker 10: As a as a part, as an exercise in our party.
Speaker 10: Because the Democrats are in no mood whatsoever to give
Speaker 10: any of this tax relief to the American people, or
Speaker 10: to beef up our national security or do any of
Speaker 10: the priorities, you know, sealing the border and deporting dangerous
Speaker 10: criminal legal aliens.
Speaker 3: They're going to vote against all that.
Speaker 10: So because we can't count on the Democrats, we have
Speaker 10: to do this ourselves. So the reconciliation process is the
Speaker 10: way to do that, and that is why we've crammed
Speaker 10: all of it.
Speaker 3: And what big bill?
Speaker 1: How word are you about the.
Speaker 11: Parliamentarian though, sir at the parliamentarian, how do you worry?
Speaker 3: Why are you worried about the parliamentarians?
Speaker 1: Ali to the thanks, Mike is running away. H has
Speaker 1: to scurry away into his little rat hole and has
Speaker 1: to go hide. I don't have any more answers, folks.
Speaker 1: I've run through my talking points. I stated how it's
Speaker 1: going to fix the border and create jobs, and that
Speaker 1: wasn't enough. And so that's all I've got I've got
Speaker 1: some prepared talking points.
Speaker 2: We've got to fix the border and create jobs. So therefore,
Speaker 2: in order to appease the Democrats, weite eliminated the debt ceiling,
Speaker 2: got rid of all restrictions on AI, you know, included
Speaker 2: the sex change funding for minors, the whole nine.
Speaker 1: Yards, and of course we're just gonna pass it to
Speaker 1: find out what's in it. A lot of gop angst
Speaker 1: over Trump's bill, as House Republicans could get jammed by
Speaker 1: Senate with little time to review major policy changes. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what Washington is good at, is kind of jamming
Speaker 1: people last minute, giving you something you haven't had time
Speaker 1: to read, Burlison says. And of course, as we pointed
Speaker 1: out multiple times, it is one one thousand pages. It
Speaker 1: is sixteen hours just to read this monstrosity.
Speaker 2: One thousand pages of very densely written legalese.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's not one thousand pages of a fun, interesting book.
Speaker 1: It's one thousand pages of something that is hard to
Speaker 1: parse and that is going to put you to sleep
Speaker 1: or in such a way as to be impenetrable. It's
Speaker 1: one thousand pages of confusing nonsense. So sixteen hours is
Speaker 1: just what it takes to skim through it. It's not
Speaker 1: sixteen hours to potentially understand it. Who knows how long
Speaker 1: that would actually take to figure out exactly what it
Speaker 1: is they're saying and talking about. Got comments nights of
Speaker 1: the storm, the bill of some pro gun stuff, and
Speaker 1: it to garner support. But the measures have no teeth.
Speaker 1: It simply makes the tax stamp zero dollars, but they're
Speaker 1: still the requirement to ask permission with a form one
Speaker 1: in storage slash transport requirements are still there.
Speaker 2: I didn't know that that's really interesting because I heard
Speaker 2: people cheering about they're getting rid of the tax stamp,
Speaker 2: but this shows they aren't getting rid of it. You're
Speaker 2: still going to be going through their databases. It's still
Speaker 2: going to be having to mess with the ATF.
Speaker 1: If you want to get one, you're still gonna have
Speaker 1: to go hat in hand to the government and say, oh, please,
Speaker 1: mister government, please, daddy government, can I have? Can would
Speaker 1: you stop infwinging on my whites? Please? Can I please have?
Speaker 11: This?
Speaker 1: Isn't that just a win? What a win?
Speaker 9: It is?
Speaker 1: KWD sixty eight Congress works ten to fifteen dollars, ten
Speaker 1: to fifteen days a month, they're too busy schmoozing a pack. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean that's where the money comes from. You know,
Speaker 1: they're figuring out what's the best way, what's the most
Speaker 1: efficient use of their time when it comes to generating
Speaker 1: revenue and working for the American people is just not
Speaker 1: as profitable as corn apak is, and you know you
Speaker 1: got to spend your time. I'm wisely Bibadu twenty twenty
Speaker 1: nine that pig Loci passed the bill. Statement was a
Speaker 1: prelude to the future. That's right. Every everyone in the
Speaker 1: American people looked at it and was like, this is insane.
Speaker 1: And everyone in the government looked at and said, oh,
Speaker 1: thank goodness. I've been so tired of pretending to read
Speaker 1: these things. I've been so tired of having to get
Speaker 1: a summary from my aids. I don't even have to
Speaker 1: pretend to do that anymore. We don't have to read it.
Speaker 1: This is wonderful kWt sixty eight. I said, pass the
Speaker 1: bill to see what's in it to a Maga a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago, and he said, it's all good. Yeah, sure, winning,
Speaker 1: that's right. So much winning, you're gonna get sick of it. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm sick of it. This is more winning than I
Speaker 1: can stomach. Knights of the Storm. Removing the taxes not enough.
Speaker 1: They still want you to beg for permission and control
Speaker 1: you with the registry. That's right. Please Daddy, Government, Please, Lisa.
Speaker 1: I remember something about shall not be infringed, But who knows.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm misremembering things more for nights of the storm,
Speaker 1: and it's the temporary thing anyway, What happens when the
Speaker 1: next guy comes in? Why id Why did the executive
Speaker 1: making Why id the executive making legislation? Anyway? That is
Speaker 1: not the function of the presidency. That's right. Why is
Speaker 1: the executive making legislation? That's right. He's not supposed to.
Speaker 1: He's given very specific powers. The legislative, judiciary, and the
Speaker 1: executive are all supposed to serve different purposes under our government.
Speaker 1: But they've all kind of blended together and abdicated certain
Speaker 1: parts here and there, so they all do a lot
Speaker 1: of the same thing. If I tyrants seventeen seventy six,
Speaker 1: all this theater is just more scripted bs. We all
Speaker 1: know it's going to pass and be signed. That's right.
Speaker 1: This is a wrestling match. They're all on the same side.
Speaker 1: They all want to take your rights. They all play
Speaker 1: for the same team. They're all nights of the storm.
Speaker 1: All bills should be single issue. This multi bill crap
Speaker 1: is just a way to slip crap in. Then nobody
Speaker 1: wants that's right. They get to bury it deep within
Speaker 1: the bill, make sure that nobody is going to actually
Speaker 1: find it, or if they do, they're not gonna have
Speaker 1: enough time to properly address it. Or if they do
Speaker 1: find it and have enough time to address it, they'll
Speaker 1: still get to say, well, there's so much good in
Speaker 1: the bill that we just have to swallow the bad
Speaker 1: in there. Sure it might be a little bit of
Speaker 1: poison in there, but you know it's mostly vitamins. It's
Speaker 1: mostly good for you, So you're just gonna have to
Speaker 1: deal with it. Angry Tiger's den. BBB does not stop
Speaker 1: welfare for illegals, does not stop funding children's sex changes,
Speaker 1: and does not end registration of suppressors. It's just gonna
Speaker 1: add four and a half trillion dollars to the debt.
Speaker 1: It's all hype. I want to thank Handy for donating
Speaker 1: on cash app really do appreciate it. Handy, And of course,
Speaker 1: as I've said before, minor Mike is matching tips today,
Speaker 1: so we really do appreciate that as well. Thank you
Speaker 1: mind Mike, Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Handy, Well, you appreciate all the donations. As Travis has mentioned,
Speaker 2: we are at seventy five percent for the month and
Speaker 2: today is the last day of the month, so we
Speaker 2: are really hoping to get over the line.
Speaker 8: That's right.
Speaker 1: If this doesn't get us there, I'm gonna have to
Speaker 1: host a telethon after the show, So don't make me
Speaker 1: do that. Don't make me, please. Trump spends one million
Speaker 1: dollars on attack ads smearing Thomas Massey as pro child
Speaker 1: general mutilation terrorists, and of course the Big Beautiful Bill
Speaker 1: doesn't stop child general mutilation. So Donald Trump isn't so
Speaker 1: much a isn't so much an advocate for children as
Speaker 1: he would like you to believe. Izzy, A joke is
Speaker 1: on Trump, I wrote on Sunday. President Trump's plan to
Speaker 1: als Massey is an exact copy of the plan the
Speaker 1: Republic and Jewish Coalition announced earlier this year. But He's
Speaker 1: going to spend his own MAGA supporters donation money on
Speaker 1: it instead of the Israel lobbies millions. Well, they love
Speaker 1: a good deal. Don't they Why pay for it when
Speaker 1: you can get it for free. We'll play this massy
Speaker 1: at real quick, and then maybe Thomas Massey on Israel
Speaker 1: as well. See why they're so mad at him?
Speaker 8: What happened to Thomas Massey?
Speaker 4: What happens is banning sex changes on mining? OO voted
Speaker 4: against him.
Speaker 1: But President Trump isn't banning sex changes on miners? Is
Speaker 1: he that got removed? Your AD's outdated, it's only been
Speaker 1: running for a couple days and it's already incorrect. How
Speaker 1: could this happen? Oh?
Speaker 8: No, you're.
Speaker 1: Your bill got neutered. Ironically, they castrated his bill. Isn't
Speaker 1: that something? But as I said, let's take a look
Speaker 1: at Thomas Massey on Israel and find out why Apak
Speaker 1: might be mad at him.
Speaker 12: Let's see you feel like israelis is their ally or
Speaker 12: they a good ally for us?
Speaker 4: Well, and this is too general of a question, Well,
Speaker 4: I think it doesn't matter.
Speaker 11: Like there's no big, giant, great Britain lobby, there's no
Speaker 11: Australian lobby, there's no German lobby.
Speaker 4: Oh the other countries don't have them. No, No, not
Speaker 4: like this, This is singular.
Speaker 11: This is unique. I mean if you're an ally. Why
Speaker 11: wouldn't we work with you? Why do you have to
Speaker 11: convince this that you're our ally? Why do you have
Speaker 11: to basically go into every congressional office and convince them?
Speaker 11: And it's because they want to keep the money flowing
Speaker 11: and that they've got a good return on their investment.
Speaker 11: I mean, we send more foreign aid to Israel than
Speaker 11: to any other country. Yeah, they're you know, ten million
Speaker 11: people or something. Yeah, I think Tennessee. I don't know
Speaker 11: if this population to Tennessee, but it's probably about you know,
Speaker 11: on that order.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I think they should. They said, we spent like
Speaker 12: twelve billion dollars, but that's not actual dollars. It's in
Speaker 12: military aid, right.
Speaker 11: Yeah, it's well it's it's dollars and munitions and treasury. Yeah,
Speaker 11: but it's not like we give them. It's a it's
Speaker 11: a gift certificate that's redeemable at Lockheed Martin and your
Speaker 11: local rayfeon you know.
Speaker 4: Okay, got it, So that's kind of how that works. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 4: got it. Yeah, why do they have this drama carve
Speaker 4: out that's just for them?
Speaker 1: Like what like what do we get from ischel asking
Speaker 1: some dangerous questions?
Speaker 4: We got a lot of countries that hate us.
Speaker 12: It's one of the things we get well, especially right
Speaker 12: now with this stuff in Gaza. It's I think it's real.
Speaker 12: It's one of the worst pr campaigns I've ever seen
Speaker 12: in my life. If they're even it doesn't make any
Speaker 12: sense to me. It's like, by I just don't get
Speaker 12: money for the government. This extremely evil look to me,
Speaker 12: you know, and I think to a lot of people.
Speaker 11: You know, well, rough numbers, there are two million people
Speaker 11: in Gaza, and fifty thousand have been killed. It's two
Speaker 11: and a half percent. Like they've killed one in forty
Speaker 11: people in Gaza. If you did that in the United States,
Speaker 11: if you did two and a half percent of three
Speaker 11: hundred and fifty million, it'd be almost ten million people
Speaker 11: there in the United States. Everybody in Gaza is at
Speaker 11: this point related to somebody who's been killed, like at
Speaker 11: least a first cousin you had killed. And then if
Speaker 11: you say how many have been maimed, it's probably three
Speaker 11: or four times that. So everybody in Gaza knows people
Speaker 11: who've been killed and maimed.
Speaker 12: And we're supporting it, right. That's also the part that
Speaker 12: makes it really tough sometimes to just be a person.
Speaker 12: It's like we are tax money is going towards this.
Speaker 12: But I just hope that people in some of these
Speaker 12: other countries know that. You know, it's not regular everyday
Speaker 12: people who would want to do these things. You know
Speaker 12: that it's like governments making these choices, and it's corporate
Speaker 12: interests that make these choices.
Speaker 4: How would we stop it? Do we need this connection
Speaker 4: with Israel?
Speaker 13: What is it?
Speaker 4: No one ever explains what it's four.
Speaker 1: I feel like, Oh, I think.
Speaker 12: Everybody have a much better understanding, you know, because it
Speaker 12: starts to feel like America is just a shell company
Speaker 12: an LLC for Israel. That's what it starts to feel
Speaker 12: like a lot of times. You know, do you feel
Speaker 12: like that that's realistic or do you feel like that
Speaker 12: that's off base.
Speaker 11: I wouldn't send him a dime, like that's my position.
Speaker 4: I don't think whatever we're getting isn't worth.
Speaker 1: This is why Apak does not like Thomas Massey. He
Speaker 1: wouldn't send them a dime. He cut it all off.
Speaker 1: He would stop the funding, which is the minimum we
Speaker 1: should do. We have allowed them to engage in this
Speaker 1: genocide in Gaza. We have funded it. We've given them
Speaker 1: the means to do it, and now they're trying to
Speaker 1: drag us further into a war in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: Bring us back to our favorite stomping grounds. Iran looks
Speaker 1: like it's in need of some democracy. N twenty nine.
Speaker 1: Tax relief is the biggest lie their publicrats have been
Speaker 1: using for decades. They've got their favorites Jim's seven apak
Speaker 1: not registered with Fara. Kruz claims it's for relationship building
Speaker 1: one ray relationship. We don't lobby than the sets. That's right.
Speaker 1: We don't have our politicians going over there and talking
Speaker 1: about how we need more I don't know, locks, bagels
Speaker 1: and cream cheese. You're going to provide us a special
Speaker 1: deal on the locks, or you're not getting any more
Speaker 1: of our Raitheon or Lockheed Martin Coupon's chev Ken. I'm
Speaker 1: noticing neighbors removing their Trump science and posters here. That's right.
Speaker 1: Some people are starting to wake up. There's some buyer's
Speaker 1: remorse happening as he completely goes back on everything he said.
Speaker 1: He was four. He said we're gonna cut the debt,
Speaker 1: We're gonna reduce the budget. Turned out to be a lie.
Speaker 1: I'm the peace President I'm going to end the conflict
Speaker 1: in Ukraine and Russia one day that didn't happen, Gonna
Speaker 1: end the conflict in Gaza that didn't happen. Not only
Speaker 1: did that not happen, but he launched strikes on Iran.
Speaker 1: Even some of the sick offense in MAGA are beginning
Speaker 1: to realize, maybe I've been had, and it seems to
Speaker 1: be a little bit too little, too late, I wrote
Speaker 1: on Sunday. President's Trump to oust Massey is an exact
Speaker 1: copy of the plan the Republican Jewish Jewish Coalition announced
Speaker 1: earlier this year. But he's going to spend his own
Speaker 1: MAGA supporters donation money on it instead of the Israel
Speaker 1: lobbies millions. It's now happening exactly as I predicted. This
Speaker 1: is from Information Liberation APAK is recruiting Massi's challenger. Trump
Speaker 1: has become one with the Israel lobby. This is from
Speaker 1: Chris Manahan. That's right, He's become one with them. He
Speaker 1: has merged they are a singular entity. Or perhaps he's
Speaker 1: wearing them like a giant mech suit, or they're wearing him.
Speaker 1: Will lobbyists for a foreign country be able to buy
Speaker 1: a seat in Congress. That's the question of my reelection.
Speaker 1: Nineteen hundred of you donated one hundred and seventy seven
Speaker 1: three hundred ninety four dollars this week to make sure
Speaker 1: I can hold this office to represent American interests, not
Speaker 1: foreign interest donations. That's right. Well, it seems like lobbyists
Speaker 1: from a foreign country are able to buy seats already.
Speaker 1: Seems like most of those in Congress are owned by somebody.
Speaker 1: If not Israel, they're definitely beholden to some other country.
Speaker 1: But generally Israel seems to be the one with the
Speaker 1: most influenced, the one that wags the dog. They get
Speaker 1: to decide what we do, where we go. Trump and
Speaker 1: those in his orbit have been discussing the idea of
Speaker 1: primarying Massy for months, as the congressman criticize the President's
Speaker 1: Reconciliation Package in his approach to foreign policy. Most recently,
Speaker 1: MASSI to cry Trump's decision to strike Iron's nuclear facilities
Speaker 1: as part of Israel's military operation to destroy the regime's
Speaker 1: nuclear program as unconstitutional. The ad, which opens with the
Speaker 1: questions what happened to Thomas Massey, criticizes Massy for voting
Speaker 1: against Trump backed legislation on sex reassignment surgery for minors,
Speaker 1: tax cuts, border security funding in his opposition to the
Speaker 1: Iran strikes. That's right, and of course the Senate removed
Speaker 1: the no funding on sex reassignment surgery for minors. Massey
Speaker 1: sided with Democrats and the Iatola. The AD narrator in
Speaker 1: tones Let's Fire Thomas Massey, he sided with the Iatola.
Speaker 11: No.
Speaker 1: He simply stated that what you did was on constitutional.
Speaker 1: He pointed out that you didn't have the authority. He
Speaker 1: didn't make any sort of declaration on Iran. He didn't
Speaker 1: side with them. He didn't say anything about them. He
Speaker 1: commented on your overreach, your overstep. That's what he did.
Speaker 1: This is simply lying. This is an attack ad. This
Speaker 1: is mud slinging. That video is something else. THEO Vaughn
Speaker 1: just seemingly innocently questioning, oh huh, how does this happen?
Speaker 1: What do we get from Israel? What is going on there?
Speaker 1: Be careful, THEO. Be careful. They don't like that. You're
Speaker 1: gonna end up with a Masad agent at your door.
Speaker 1: Trump and Massy feud reaches fever pitch. This is from
Speaker 1: Greg Nash. President Trump's feud with Representative Thomas Massey is
Speaker 1: showing no signs of abating as the President seeks to
Speaker 1: oust the GOP congressman for his history of regularly breaking
Speaker 1: with the administration. That's right, how dare you not toe
Speaker 1: party line? And this article is from the Hill? How
Speaker 1: dare you not side with me? How dare you not
Speaker 1: follow the dear Leader? You do as I say, you
Speaker 1: walk as I walk, or we're gonna have problems. Now
Speaker 1: going to go onto this next article because that one
Speaker 1: basically just rehashes what has been going on, but it
Speaker 1: is still worth mentioning. This is from the Guardian. Tom
Speaker 1: Tillis won't seek reelection after clash with Trump over big
Speaker 1: beautiful bill. And of course good riddance to Tom Tillis.
Speaker 1: But as I said before, this is echoing North Korea.
Speaker 1: It's shades of Kim Jong un, isn't it. Don't question
Speaker 1: the dear Leader, don't break with the party line, or
Speaker 1: else you can be removed. President salted Republican senator and
Speaker 1: threatened to back his primary challenger after he opposed the
Speaker 1: domestic bill. Tom Tillis announced on Sunday that he will
Speaker 1: not run for reelection to the US Senate next year.
Speaker 1: One day after the North Carolina Republicans vote against Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's signature piece of domestic legislation prompted the president, they
Speaker 1: launched a barrage of threats and insults, as well as
Speaker 1: promised to support a primary challenger to feed him in
Speaker 1: their parties twenty twenty six primary. Shortly after Tillis refused
Speaker 1: to support the massive package of tax and spending cuts
Speaker 1: called the One Big Beautiful Bill in a procedural vote
Speaker 1: in the Senate on Saturday, Trump attacked the senator on
Speaker 1: a social media platform. True social of course, this is
Speaker 1: a tax and spend bill, not tax and spending cuts.
Speaker 1: The President accused Tillis of grand standing in order to
Speaker 1: get some publicity for himself for a possible but very
Speaker 1: difficult reelection. And this, of course is projection. Trump is
Speaker 1: the biggest grandstander that I've seen in my life in politics.
Speaker 2: This is Tillis telling the truth for once, as he's leaving.
Speaker 1: He's about to walk out the door. This is like
Speaker 1: the employee that has already given their two weeks notice
Speaker 1: and it's their final day. They don't have to care
Speaker 1: what their manager says anymore. They don't have to be respectful.
Speaker 1: They don't have to deal with the customers, so they
Speaker 1: can just say whatever they want. Tom Tillis is just
Speaker 1: being honest, as Lance said, for the first time in
Speaker 1: his career.
Speaker 2: Trump is saying he's trying to gain favor for a
Speaker 2: difficult election, when in fact, it's all just well, if
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna run, may as well be honest.
Speaker 1: I got nothing left to lose. I might as well
Speaker 1: see what telling the truth feels like. Huh, that feels
Speaker 1: kind of nice me. Before tell Us announced his decision
Speaker 1: Sunday to retire from the Senate, Trump continued to attack
Speaker 1: him on social media, writing do this is a talker
Speaker 1: and a complainer, not a doer. He's even worse than
Speaker 1: Rand Paul Rand Fauci. Paul, what's rand Fauci?
Speaker 2: Paul Fauci, the guy that he gave a ward two
Speaker 2: and did every recommendation he had.
Speaker 1: Are you trying to distance yourself from your friendly neighborhood keebler?
Speaker 7: Elf?
Speaker 1: Mister Trump, that was your boy, that was your man.
Speaker 1: Let's not get it twist. I thought you were such
Speaker 1: good friends. Oh well, easy come, easy go. So they
Speaker 1: say we're going to take a quick break, but before
Speaker 1: we do we've got chev ken Wait, No, I already
Speaker 1: read that one. That's the buyer's remorse with Maga. People
Speaker 1: are pulling down their signs and posters. It's over, the
Speaker 1: honeymoon's done. What did we sign up for? Truly, even
Speaker 1: the Maga sick offens can't ignore all of it anymore,
Speaker 1: at least some of them can't. And I suppose that's
Speaker 1: a hopeful sign. As I mentioned before, I will continue
Speaker 1: to mention Minor Mike is tip matching. We are at
Speaker 1: seventy five percent on the gas gage and we have
Speaker 1: this is the final day of the month, so if
Speaker 1: you'd like to help us get over that, Minor Mike
Speaker 1: is matching all tips across all platforms, So however you
Speaker 1: would like to donate, you will match that. We really
Speaker 1: do appreciate that. We thank you all for the support
Speaker 1: have given us. It has been it's what keeps this
Speaker 1: program going. Really do appreciate the continue to support, especially
Speaker 1: as we pray for our dad's quick recovery. We ask
Speaker 1: that you continue to pray for that, pray that his
Speaker 1: voice and speech would be restored to him and that
Speaker 1: he'd be back in this chair soon. So thank you
Speaker 1: all for the support, and thank you all for the prayers.
Speaker 1: We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right.
Speaker 2: Back and.
Speaker 7: Making sense. Comment again, you're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 7: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 14: Sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Speaker 14: Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
Speaker 14: sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 4: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 14: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 14: monopoly money.
Speaker 4: Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 14: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 14: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the fed
Speaker 14: up the all New David Night Show Commemorative Coin. Now
Speaker 14: patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
Speaker 14: a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 14: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 14: listening to.
Speaker 11: The truth doesn't need inflation only support.
Speaker 8: If you're listening to the David Night Show, we remember
Speaker 8: the bat we remember the places, We remember the Southern soldiers.
Speaker 8: We are the sons of Confederate veterans and we invite
Speaker 8: you to join us in preserving our past and remembering
Speaker 8: our history and heritage of honor. To find out more,
Speaker 8: call one eight hundred and my South or visit us
Speaker 8: on the Well.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, folks. As I said, we're going to look
Speaker 1: at what's going on with the war, and they can't
Speaker 1: seem to even really decide if their strikes on Iran
Speaker 1: had any effect. And of course that has led to
Speaker 1: some fractures in the Republican Party as well. People Donald
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't like it when you question him. He came
Speaker 1: out and he said it was a big, beautiful strike.
Speaker 1: It was so effective, it was so powerful. But some
Speaker 1: people are like, actually, that didn't happen. And I want
Speaker 1: to thank Derek. Thank you so much, Derek for the
Speaker 1: donation on cash app. We really do appreciate it. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. And I had the war stuff, but
Speaker 1: I can't seem to find it.
Speaker 2: Like to point out that you can donate on other
Speaker 2: platforms and we will tip match that as well. Yes,
Speaker 2: and thank you too, Minor Mike for the tip matching.
Speaker 1: Yes, thank you so much. I'm I had the where
Speaker 1: did it go?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 1: Well, well, hopefully I'll find it. But to move on
Speaker 1: with the show. We'll cover some different news.
Speaker 3: For now.
Speaker 1: We've got driver Fury and this is from the Daily
Speaker 1: Mail online. Driver Fury its hurts his new Orellian scanners
Speaker 1: trigger instant four hundred dollars fines for barely visible scuffs.
Speaker 1: And this is just typical of how AI is going
Speaker 1: to be used to medle with and parse every part
Speaker 1: of your life. It's going to catalog every little thing. Oh,
Speaker 1: there's a minor scuff. It's barely detectable, it's almost invisible
Speaker 1: to the naked eye. Where that's four hundred dollars. This week,
Speaker 1: the company confirmed to dailymail dot com and it charged
Speaker 1: a driver four hundred and forty dollars for a one
Speaker 1: inch scratch on a wheel. The scuff, commonly caused when
Speaker 1: a driver brushes a curb wall parallel parking, was flagged
Speaker 1: by the scanner. The bill included a two hundred fifty
Speaker 1: dollars fine for the damage on hundred and twenty five
Speaker 1: dollars to processing, which is AI, and a sixty five
Speaker 1: dollars administrative fee which is presumably AI as well. So
Speaker 1: they're charging you massive fees for these companies to process.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful. Well you made us have to process
Speaker 1: this paperwork. I mean, we don't have someone actually doing it.
Speaker 1: It's a program, it's an AI, but we're going to
Speaker 1: hit you with another fee for that. Another driver claim
Speaker 1: they got one hundred ninety five dollars fee for a
Speaker 1: tiny dent when returning a Toyota Corolla. AI is simply
Speaker 1: a busybody. Each driver's experience is part of a larger
Speaker 1: tech rollout at Hurts, which recently partnered with a Uverse
Speaker 1: with you verse UVE, a startup that builds high speed
Speaker 1: automated vehicle inspection systems. That's right, they're high speed and automated.
Speaker 1: Renters drive their cars through the scanners twice, once when
Speaker 1: they pick up the vehicle and again when it's returned.
Speaker 1: Drivers will receive a copy of previously scan damage, the
Speaker 1: company confirmed dailymail dot com Hurts wants to use the
Speaker 1: scanners at one hundred rental locations by the end of
Speaker 1: the year. I'm going to use it to soak the
Speaker 1: consumer for even more money. A line is crossed when
Speaker 1: AI applications become overly aggressive. A prioritize efficiency over customer
Speaker 1: fairness and satisfaction. David Lynn and ai ans previously told
Speaker 1: dailymail dot com this goes into what I've said before
Speaker 1: where they're talking about reducing government and reducing the number
Speaker 1: of people in it, which sounds great, sounds wonderful. So
Speaker 1: you realize that it's not going to reduce the scope
Speaker 1: of government. AI will simply handle those jobs. There will
Speaker 1: be no one you can talk to about it. And
Speaker 1: while it's unlikely you might be able to get some
Speaker 1: kind of mercy from an actual human being, it might
Speaker 1: be able to look at your plight and empathize with it.
Speaker 1: The AI is not going to do that. It is
Speaker 1: going to have a set of parameters that it's told
Speaker 1: to function within, and it will drop the hammer relentlessly.
Speaker 1: It will not be able to sympathize or empathize. It
Speaker 1: will simply do its job. It will just follow orders.
Speaker 1: Hurts declined to comment on this article. Instead, the company
Speaker 1: pointed to its loss damage waiver, which typically costs between
Speaker 1: twenty and thirty dollars per rental day, as a way
Speaker 1: to avoid surprising fees. That's right, Well, if you don't
Speaker 1: want to pay these giant fees which were going to
Speaker 1: impose via AI, just pay an extra twenty thirty dollars
Speaker 1: up front. It's the iron hand in the velvet glove.
Speaker 1: I will no longer be using Hertz, the Corolla renter
Speaker 1: said on Reddit. Reached out to customer service. They said
Speaker 1: they stand by the AI. We stand with our AI
Speaker 1: brothers and sisters. This is from Bloomberg Lab. Grown meat
Speaker 1: is the fake climate food fix that just Won't die
Speaker 1: is by Dina Shanker. Back in the early aughts, biofuels
Speaker 1: such as ethanol were looking like a powerful answer to
Speaker 1: our then emerging understanding of the climate crisis and our
Speaker 1: reliance on foreign oil. Using renewable fuels made from plants
Speaker 1: like corn, experts said, could significantly reduce energy emissions compared
Speaker 1: with gasoline. Even better was the future promise of advanced biofuels,
Speaker 1: which would one day use an edible biomass instead of food.
Speaker 1: That's right. It was the solution of the time. It
Speaker 1: was the hype. It probably got a lot of funding,
Speaker 1: It got a ton of people a lot of money.
Speaker 1: I'm sure many people were made extremely wealthy. February two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight, Searchinger published a paper in the journal
Speaker 1: Science that dismantled the environmental case for biofuels. The findings
Speaker 1: were covered widely by the media, and the National Resources
Speaker 1: Defense Council abandoned its biofuels campaign shortly thereafter. Political bodies
Speaker 1: have been harder to persuade, and biofuels have hardly disappeared,
Speaker 1: but they have at the very least lost much of
Speaker 1: their environmental shine. That's right, that's the scam that they
Speaker 1: used to push all these things on us. Don't you
Speaker 1: know we're burning the planet up. It's gonna die. Well,
Speaker 1: so it's not burning up, it's climate change. Things are
Speaker 1: changing the climate. You know, it's doing stuff. Isn't that scary?
Speaker 1: We are eating the Earth's catalog the absurd number of
Speaker 1: startups and the techno food space in twenty nineteen, many
Speaker 1: of which would soon fail thanks to thanks largely to
Speaker 1: products that didn't taste very good because something Grunwald seems
Speaker 1: to recognize startups just eats. Eggs made from mung beans
Speaker 1: had an earthy off taste, he writes, while beyond burgers
Speaker 1: on the grill smelled like someone literally peeing in the wind.
Speaker 1: That's right, But you're saving the planet. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: that the product is terrible, that it tastes bad and
Speaker 1: smells bad. And is bad for you because it's manufactured
Speaker 1: with a bunch of chemical garbage. You're saving the planet.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful? You can save the planet by just
Speaker 1: eating this gross, gross garbage. I no searchinger for my
Speaker 1: own work writing about food and climate, So I had
Speaker 1: asked him, did you agree with Grunwald on the potential
Speaker 1: of cultivated meat in particular is a potential climate solution?
Speaker 1: He said he was skeptical, but thought the endeavor was
Speaker 1: worth trying. There is promise for products, he says, that
Speaker 1: taste as good as the real thing, costs a bit less.
Speaker 1: It contained just a small amount of cultivated meat that
Speaker 1: is mixed mostly with plants. No such product is currently
Speaker 1: on the market. So I told him that all sounded
Speaker 1: a bit like better biofuels that never showed up. His response, touche,
Speaker 1: now can't deny that that's a you got me there, Oh,
Speaker 1: you got me there. Sure it's more of this utopian nonsense,
Speaker 1: But I for one can't wait for my cancer burger,
Speaker 1: my tumor steak. Isn't it going to be wonderful when
Speaker 1: they can just cultivate this And of course we've seen
Speaker 1: how they cultivate it. It looks disgusting. Honor Seeker, thank
Speaker 1: you so much for the tip. That is incredibly kind,
Speaker 1: and he says, I seed my time to you guys. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Honor Seeker. And I believe I already read those.
Speaker 1: I think Rumble has an issue where if someone donates
Speaker 1: a large tip, it refreshes and brings it back at
Speaker 1: some point. But again, I just want to thank Jeff
Speaker 1: Weese and Sam Miller. Those were incredibly generous and we
Speaker 1: really do appreciate it, and thank you, Honor Seeker. Again,
Speaker 1: we appreciate all the support. Can Ohio's Anthony Fauci beat
Speaker 1: Vivek Rama Swamy, it's the battle of the snakes, Chabri,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. That is incredibly generous. Thank you
Speaker 1: for stepping up until your father's ready to come back.
Speaker 1: Travison Lance prayers for you all well, thank you for
Speaker 1: the kind words, and thank you so much for praying
Speaker 1: for him. We are all praying for his swift return,
Speaker 1: so please continue to do so. Please pray for healing
Speaker 1: of his tongue and for his vocal cords. Please keep
Speaker 1: that in your prayers. Can Ohio's Anthony Fauci beat Vivek Ramaswamy,
Speaker 1: as I said, it's the battle of the snakes. Amy
Speaker 1: Acton oversaw public health for Ohio during COVID. Can she
Speaker 1: become governor? This, of course is not actually Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: This is Ohio's own personal Anthony Fauci. Actin hasn't been
Speaker 1: in the public eye since the early throws of the pandemic,
Speaker 1: and she's emerging now into a totally different world. Did
Speaker 1: she lock herself away? Been hiding in her room? She isolated?
Speaker 1: Put on the mask better. COVID skepticism on the right
Speaker 1: has given rise to the crunchy health and wellness doctor
Speaker 1: known as Maha, with Robert F. Kennedy Junior, a vaccine
Speaker 1: skeptic who glims processed foods and scene oils or driving
Speaker 1: chronic illness, setting the tone as the nation's health secretary.
Speaker 1: This is from Politico, by the way. In the year
Speaker 1: since the pandemic, trust in doctors and scientists has plummeted
Speaker 1: among members of both parties. Increasing number of young Americans
Speaker 1: are getting their medical advice from TikTok and YouTube. In
Speaker 1: the midst of these trends, Acting will be reckoning with
Speaker 1: her own legacy that this isn't decisions she made when
Speaker 1: so little was known about the virus. Whatever was known
Speaker 1: or wasn't known about the virus, we knew that it
Speaker 1: was unconstitutional to lock everyone down. They did not have
Speaker 1: the authority. They didn't have that power. Whatever the virusrus
Speaker 1: was or wasn't doing.
Speaker 2: We didn't know anything about the virus back then. That's
Speaker 2: why we implemented everything that we've been trying to implement
Speaker 2: for years to give us power and control over the
Speaker 2: American people, and mandated things like masks, which had always
Speaker 2: been known by things like OSHA to be unhealthy to
Speaker 2: wear it for long times. So, you know, we just
Speaker 2: didn't know what we were doing.
Speaker 1: Isn't it just so wonderful that all these things that
Speaker 1: they had wanted to do for years turned out to
Speaker 1: be the exact way to combat the virus. It was
Speaker 1: such a serendipitous event. It was so wonderful. It's just
Speaker 1: so special, she says, her stump speech and unsubtleed Jabeter
Speaker 1: detractors excuse me, accent will be reckoning with her own
Speaker 1: legacy and decisions she made when so little was known
Speaker 1: about the virus. Acting is defensive of her posture back then.
Speaker 1: A leader's job is to give you a north star,
Speaker 1: to tell you these cold ares facts. That's right, they
Speaker 1: were facts, except even Politico admits that so little was
Speaker 1: known about the virus, but she had cold, hard facts
Speaker 1: at her disposal, she says in her stump speech and
Speaker 1: unsubtle jabbeter detractors, as well as the parasocial relationships some
Speaker 1: people have to her from the days of near daily briefings.
Speaker 1: That connection is something I'm very proud of. Act and
Speaker 1: told me. She's also relatively light tight lipped about Dwine,
Speaker 1: who has swatted away any notion he might cross party
Speaker 1: lines to endorse his former health director, insisting they had
Speaker 1: remained on good terms after her departure. The way we
Speaker 1: worked together was real, she said, it was real. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was so wonderful. Those were the good old days,
Speaker 1: when people just listened and bought everything I said, when
Speaker 1: they unquestioningly trusted me. Acted acknowledges the mere fact of
Speaker 1: her candidacy dredging up COVID times can be strange and
Speaker 1: painful for some people. Even kneecap her campaign in its infancy,
Speaker 1: we did overwhelm hospitals. People died during COVID from heart attacks,
Speaker 1: and strokes because ambulances had nowhere to go, Act and staid,
Speaker 1: recalling when the most night one of the more nightmaresh
Speaker 1: realities of that chapter.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I remember the hospitals being so full, and yes,
Speaker 2: the heart attacks and strokes are because there just wasn't
Speaker 2: enough space.
Speaker 1: Hospital's full of dancing nurses, Ugh calling some one of
Speaker 1: the more nightmarish realities of that chapter. We haven't been
Speaker 1: honest as a country and just laid that out there.
Speaker 1: It's been too political. We have a lot to learn
Speaker 1: from that because we will face crises again. The only
Speaker 1: crises is people like you coming in and usurping power.
Speaker 1: You are the crises. The person that acts during the crisis,
Speaker 1: the crisis actor, you might say. Alison Smith, the nurse
Speaker 1: with the COVID scrapbook, and Archbold opened up to acton
Speaker 1: about being a contact tracer. I told her that I
Speaker 1: was threatened, Smith said, thumbing opened the book to a
Speaker 1: photo of her children too and four and masks what
Speaker 1: makes you cry when I look back. It was a
Speaker 1: hard time. It was actually traumatic for people in a
Speaker 1: lot of ways. That's right, it was traumatic. The government
Speaker 1: inflicted so much psychological trauma. The amount of fear that
Speaker 1: they generated in people is truly mind boggling. People to
Speaker 1: this day still can't get past it. You still see
Speaker 1: people out and about in masks, sometimes still even in
Speaker 1: their cars alone, riding with masks on. People have been
Speaker 1: beyond just being damaged by the vaccine. They were damaged
Speaker 1: by the propaganda mentally, emotionally. They have yet to recover,
Speaker 1: and they probably never will. Pam Bondi acts as January
Speaker 1: six prosecutors in horrifying purge, of course, says The Daily Beast.
Speaker 1: That's right. They should be jailed, not just removed. They
Speaker 1: are despicable. Has there any general Pambondi has fired at
Speaker 1: least three career Justice Department prosecutors who worked on cases
Speaker 1: related to the Jant six insurrection. There's an insurrection. When
Speaker 1: they walked politely between those red velvet ropes, it was
Speaker 1: an insurrection.
Speaker 2: They're fine with, you know, giving people these absurd jail
Speaker 2: sentences for walking, as you said, between the velvet ropes,
Speaker 2: but if they are faced with any repercussions for their
Speaker 2: horrific injustice there, it's a horrific purge of prosecutors. Thest
Speaker 2: poor career justices are losing their jobs. Because they are
Speaker 2: corrupt and evil. Oh what a shame.
Speaker 1: Oh no, not the career politicians. Won't someone think of
Speaker 1: the career politicians. I won't. I'll never consider these people again.
Speaker 1: The attorneys were informed in letters signed by Bondi that
Speaker 1: they were removed from federal service, effective immediately, with no
Speaker 1: further explanation. NBC News reported, And I'm sure they'll go
Speaker 1: on to have some kind of lucrative career somewhere else.
Speaker 1: They will reappear somewhere, just merge into the fabric and
Speaker 1: become lobbyists or something like that.
Speaker 2: One federal corruption has a way of finding a place,
Speaker 2: whether it's working for big pharma at the mainstream media
Speaker 2: news corporations, or as you said, some think tank or
Speaker 2: lobbyist thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So maybe they'll write books about their times. Maybe they'll
Speaker 1: tell the harrowing tale of how they prosecuted these dangerous insurrectionists.
Speaker 1: It was a scary time. We didn't know if they
Speaker 1: were going to have friends that would come to our door.
Speaker 1: I wonder I would bet at least one of them
Speaker 1: will write a book about it. One federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: official told NBC that the firings were horrifying, calling it
Speaker 1: a slap in the face, not only to them, but
Speaker 1: to all career DOJ prosecutors. Oh no, oh no, the
Speaker 1: poor DOJ prosecutors. I feel so bad for them. It's
Speaker 1: just tragic. Crime a river, cry me a river. Career
Speaker 1: politicians deserve no sympathy. We should get rid of them all.
Speaker 1: This is from Newsweek. Zororn mom Donnie proposes taxing wider
Speaker 1: neighborhoods in NYC. That's right, the white tax is here,
Speaker 1: your neighborhood. It's too nice you you get out of here.
Speaker 1: Come on way, What are you doing hogging all the
Speaker 1: good neighborhoods for yourself? The article is going to talk
Speaker 1: about this. New York City's Democratic mayoral candidate, Zorn Mandani,
Speaker 1: has said he wants to shift the tax burden to
Speaker 1: richer and wider neighborhoods if you secure election in November.
Speaker 1: Housing policy document mom Donnie's official website includes a pledge
Speaker 1: to shift the tax burden from overtax homeowners in the
Speaker 1: outer boroughs to more expensive homes and richer in whier neighborhoods.
Speaker 2: Those white neighborhoods are all built on magic dirt exactly.
Speaker 1: That's why they're nicer. It's because they got access to
Speaker 1: the good dirt. Mom. Donnie's proposal has already sparked a backlash,
Speaker 1: with one conservative commentator branding him racist, urging New Yorkers
Speaker 1: to support incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, and said, who is
Speaker 1: running in November as an independent man?
Speaker 8: The uh.
Speaker 1: Choice of politicians you have anywhere is bad, but in
Speaker 1: New York it is another level of insanity. When Eric
Speaker 1: Adams might be the better choice, you are scraping the
Speaker 1: bottom of the barrel. New York is a hell hole.
Speaker 1: It is an awful place. Every time I've been there
Speaker 1: it has been miserable. I have zero interest in it.
Speaker 2: I've been seeing a lot of stuff about Montani when
Speaker 2: he was running because of the one interview where he
Speaker 2: was asked and they asked the entire panel, what country
Speaker 2: would you go to first? I believe that's on the
Speaker 2: board if you want to pull that up.
Speaker 1: Yes, here we have it. This is a pretty good clip.
Speaker 11: First ford visit by a mayor of New York is
Speaker 11: always considered significant.
Speaker 7: Where would you go first?
Speaker 3: That's right, at.
Speaker 6: First visit, I would visit the Holy Land, Cuomo.
Speaker 9: I'll give him the hostility in the anti Semitism that
Speaker 9: has been show me in New York.
Speaker 2: I would go to Israel.
Speaker 4: Israel, mister Tilson, where would you go?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'd make my fourth trip to Israel, followed by
Speaker 5: my fifth trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies
Speaker 5: fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.
Speaker 9: Mister politicians, I would stay in New York City. My
Speaker 9: plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs
Speaker 9: and focus on that.
Speaker 2: Mister mum Donnie, can I just jump in?
Speaker 3: Would you visit Israel?
Speaker 14: Mayor?
Speaker 9: I will be doing as the mayor. I'll be standing
Speaker 9: up for Jewish New Yorkers, and I'll be meeting them
Speaker 9: wherever they are across the Five boroughs, whether that's in
Speaker 9: their synagogues and temples, or at their homes or at
Speaker 9: the subway platform, because ultimately we need to focus on
Speaker 9: delivering on their concerns. We also know, do you believe
Speaker 9: in a Jewish state of Israel? I believe Israel has
Speaker 9: the right to exist as a Jewish state, as.
Speaker 2: A state with equal rights.
Speaker 8: He won't.
Speaker 1: Exist a Jewish state, American politicians.
Speaker 4: That's what No, no, no.
Speaker 9: Unlike unlike yourectly, my goal would be to take my
Speaker 9: first trip to Israel.
Speaker 1: My wife's life work in this area means a lot
Speaker 1: to our family. Isn't that wonderful? New York politicians are
Speaker 1: arguing over who can be the biggest Zionist shill.
Speaker 2: And this is I feel a large part of why
Speaker 2: he got elected because even people on the right were
Speaker 2: celebrating this, and yeah, America could not be a client
Speaker 2: state of Israel. Everyone can see that. Everyone is starting
Speaker 2: to support people that are pushing back against that. Unfortunately,
Speaker 2: this seems to be the only thing that he's correct about.
Speaker 1: He's wrong on everything else. He has one good take
Speaker 1: and that he won't go to Israel and become their puppet.
Speaker 1: Apparently everything else is simply racial politics, and I would
Speaker 1: bet that he is simply viewing the Israeli issue as
Speaker 1: a race thing as well.
Speaker 7: It is.
Speaker 1: Truly something to see these American politicians vying for supremacy
Speaker 1: when it comes to who is the biggest supporter of Israel. Oh,
Speaker 1: I support Israel the most. I would take my first
Speaker 1: trip to Israel. Oh you take your first trip, Well,
Speaker 1: I would take my fifth trip. That's right, I've been
Speaker 1: there four times before this. I'm their biggest sickophant. And
Speaker 1: then after Israel, I'm going to Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Isn't it wonderful our two greatest allies? You can tell
Speaker 2: how great of an ally they are by how much
Speaker 2: money they take from us.
Speaker 1: Exactly greatest ally is defined by who and what. I'm
Speaker 1: assuming it's a self assigned moniker. Were your greatest ally,
Speaker 1: don't you know?
Speaker 8: Well?
Speaker 1: That's Zoran Mamdani, the potential new mayor of New York City.
Speaker 1: As I said, New York is a hell hole. These
Speaker 1: are the choices that they have to pick from. Not
Speaker 1: that we have it much better anywhere else, but at
Speaker 1: least they tend to pay a little bit more lip
Speaker 1: service to at least the people who are voting for
Speaker 1: them in New York. They can't even be bothered with that.
Speaker 1: It is I have hated every single time I've been
Speaker 1: to New York, given I've only ever been there for
Speaker 1: work to film things. But I don't think I'd have
Speaker 1: a much better time there if I went for fun.
Speaker 1: In fact, I can't really imagine having fun in New York.
Speaker 1: Last time I was there, some guy tried to sell
Speaker 1: us crack late at night after we had finished work.
Speaker 1: He was just sitting on a trash can as we
Speaker 1: walked past. First we could understandhim. Eventually got fed up
Speaker 1: with us not understanding Alingo and just said, you want
Speaker 1: to buy some crack. It's like, I don't think you
Speaker 1: understand your client base, Sir, I don't think you truly
Speaker 1: know what crackheads look like. You're probably barking up the
Speaker 1: wrong tree here.
Speaker 7: We love the road.
Speaker 1: I'm we're surprised we don't see more of this in
Speaker 1: the presidential debates. It is almost shocking. You're right, you'd think,
Speaker 1: with how much influence Apak has that it would just
Speaker 1: be Donald Trump and Kamala Harris or whoever out there. No,
Speaker 1: I support Israel the most well. In fact, I do.
Speaker 1: Me and BB we have such long, wonderful conversations. Well,
Speaker 1: we've taken long romantic walks on the beach where I've
Speaker 1: pledged our military to him. I can't wait for the
Speaker 1: next election. It'll be wonderful. I'm sure we're gonna take
Speaker 1: a quick break. We come back. We're gonna look at
Speaker 1: what Israel is up to. I'm sure it'll be lovely.
Speaker 1: Stay with us, we're right back.
Speaker 7: Did I mistlect that? David night?
Speaker 2: Thank you?
Speaker 1: Welcome back. We've got just eighteen minutes left in the
Speaker 1: broadcast today. Time goes by fast when you stare into
Speaker 1: the abyss, doesn't It just flies right by. As I said,
Speaker 1: we're going to look at what's going on with Israel.
Speaker 1: But before that happens, on remind everyone that Minor Mike
Speaker 1: is matching all donations made today, whether it's a tip
Speaker 1: on Rumble, a subscription on kick ordination through cash app
Speaker 1: or zell. So if you'd like to help us reach
Speaker 1: our goal for the month, we are at about seventy
Speaker 1: five percent, and we would greatly appreciate it. It's from
Speaker 1: listeners like you where we get our support and we
Speaker 1: really can't thank you enough. We really do appreciate it
Speaker 1: and really thank Minor Mike for that. It is incredibly generous.
Speaker 1: So thank you all so much, and thank you Minor Mike.
Speaker 1: This is from Anti War. It'sraeli forces kill forty three
Speaker 1: Palestinians in Gaza, including twenty AID seekers and this is
Speaker 1: the continual way they operate. They have no regard for life,
Speaker 1: they have no interest in who or what the people are.
Speaker 1: They'll kill men, women and children just the same. They
Speaker 1: believe they have the right to and America just co
Speaker 1: signs it. We keep sending them weapons and money. Medical
Speaker 1: sources have told Al Jazeera that Israeli forces have at
Speaker 1: least forty three more Palestinians have at least forty three
Speaker 1: Palestinians in Gaza on Monday, as the daily masters continue.
Speaker 1: I think meant to say killed at least how much
Speaker 1: of the world's attention is on the Israeli US war
Speaker 1: against Iran. Among those killed on Monday were at least
Speaker 1: twenty Palestinians who are seeking aid for the crime of
Speaker 1: seeking reprieve from the horrible conditions Israel. Let's put them under.
Speaker 1: Since the US and Israeli backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began
Speaker 1: operating in Gaza at the end of May, more than
Speaker 1: four hundred people have been killed by the IDF, all
Speaker 1: attempting to get food for their starving families. Crime of
Speaker 1: trying not to starve to death. You'll be executed for that.
Speaker 1: You should die quietly. You should accept your fate so
Speaker 1: that Benjamin Netan Yahoo can expand his territory, perhaps so
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump can turn Gaza into a glitzy casino paradise.
Speaker 1: It'll be wonderful it'll be beautiful, just quietly pass away.
Speaker 1: Israeli airstrikes and shelling also pounded targets across Gaza on Monday.
Speaker 1: According to the Palestinian news agency WAFA, at least four
Speaker 1: people were killed and others were wounded when Israeli warplanes
Speaker 1: targeted tents sheltering displaced Palestinians near the southern city of
Speaker 1: Khan Yunis targeting tents more. You could see a picture there.
Speaker 1: This is Mourner's reacting with the body of a Palestinian
Speaker 1: boy killed on Sunday by Israeli fire, all seeking aid
Speaker 1: in northern Gaza. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, it's
Speaker 1: a child. Doesn't look like he could be older than fourteen.
Speaker 1: WAFA also reported that three brothers were killed by an
Speaker 1: Israeli strike while they were inspecting their damaged home in
Speaker 1: bait Lahya, northern Gaza. Four Palestinians are also killed by
Speaker 1: Israeli attacks on Jibalia, which is near bait Lahia. It's indiscriminate.
Speaker 1: They have no concern for life, men, women or children.
Speaker 1: They're all just targets, equal opportunity. Murderers are the idef.
Speaker 1: There are still a number of victims under the rubble
Speaker 1: and on the streets, an ambulance and civil defense crews
Speaker 1: cannot reach them, the Ministry wrote on telegram. The Ministry
Speaker 1: said the latest violence has brought the death toll since
Speaker 1: October seventh, twenty twenty three, to fifty five thy nine
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety eight, a number of wounded tow one
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty one thousand, five hundred and fifty nine.
Speaker 1: Studies of sh that the Health Ministry's numbers are a
Speaker 1: significant under count, and estimates that factor in indirect deaths
Speaker 1: caused by the Israeli siege and destruction of all of
Speaker 1: Gaza's civilian infrastructure bring the death toll into the hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands we saw with that clip with THEO Vaughn
Speaker 1: and Thomas Massey. Thomas Massey pointed out that just by
Speaker 1: the numbers that are confirmed, the ones that are probably
Speaker 1: a severe undercount, that's two point five percent of the
Speaker 1: population that's been killed, two point five percent a massive
Speaker 1: death toll. The UN condemns Gaza a death trap, as
Speaker 1: dozens reported killed by Israeli fire. At least forty six
Speaker 1: people waiting for aid have been killed by Israeli fire
Speaker 1: and two incidents in central and southern Gaza, according to
Speaker 1: rescuers and hospitals. UN agencies have condemned the US and
Speaker 1: his early backed food distribution system it was unoficial, calling
Speaker 1: it an abomination and a death trap. Such deadly incidents
Speaker 1: have recently become a near daily occurrence occurrents, but have
Speaker 1: attracted relatively little attention outside Gaza since Israel attacked Iran
Speaker 1: more than a week ago. That's right, people are more
Speaker 1: interested in the upcoming war than the ongoing genocide. Without
Speaker 1: including the latest deaths, you want to said that more
Speaker 1: than four hundred and ten Palestinians are reported to have
Speaker 1: been killed by Israeli gunfire or shelling since the Gaza
Speaker 1: Humanitarian Foundation began work in late May. Why are our
Speaker 1: children's lives seen as so cheap? Demanded um Reid al Nuazi,
Speaker 1: a widow whose son was shot and wounded after he
Speaker 1: went overnight to collect food for his hungry family in
Speaker 1: central Gaza. It is my son went to get a
Speaker 1: grain of flour so he could eat and feed his siblings,
Speaker 1: and now he's in the intensive care unit. He went
Speaker 1: out to help feed his siblings, so he went out
Speaker 1: to find food, so that his family could eat, and
Speaker 1: now he's in the ICU. Why are children's lives seen
Speaker 1: as so cheap? It's a good question, of course. We've
Speaker 1: seen over and over again the American Zionists and their
Speaker 1: wholehearted support of Israel, their lack of care for the
Speaker 1: Palestinian people. Well, cosign anything Israel does. You're killing men,
Speaker 1: women and children. Well, you're a God's chosen people. You
Speaker 1: have the right to that land. It says so in
Speaker 1: the Bible. They're bad. Theology allows them to co sign slaughter,
Speaker 1: mass murdered, genocide. Is truly despicable to see these people
Speaker 1: and the way that they worship the state of Israel.
Speaker 1: Children's lives are seen as cheap. These people who likely
Speaker 1: in the United Slime States, would support an abortion ban.
Speaker 1: They would say their pro life. But because it's Israel
Speaker 1: who's doing the killing of women and children, I don't
Speaker 1: seem to care. Footage from al Ah, the hospital in Nuserat,
Speaker 1: showed chaotic scenes as young men with gunshot wounds were
Speaker 1: carried in, groaning in pain and some drenched in blood.
Speaker 1: Soon every bed was filled and casualties covered the floor.
Speaker 1: An older man was set down dead as his wife bereft,
Speaker 1: cradled his face and wept. Hospital officials and the Hamas
Speaker 1: run Civil Defense agency said that at least twenty one
Speaker 1: people were killed and some one hundred and fifty injured.
Speaker 1: Witnesses said that thousands had crowded near a site run
Speaker 1: by the GHF and an Israeli military zone when soldiers
Speaker 1: opened fire. Just opening fire on a crowd of people.
Speaker 1: Our greatest ally. The Israel Defense Force said a gathering
Speaker 1: had been identified an area adjacent IDF troops operating in
Speaker 1: the Netzarim corridor. Ports of injured individuals as a result
Speaker 1: of IDF fire in the area were received. The details
Speaker 1: are under review, it stated. GHF said there were no
Speaker 1: incidents near any of our sites this morning. We've seen
Speaker 1: Israel lie over and over again continually to justify these actions. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, there were reports of an incident, and so
Speaker 1: we opened fire on the crowd. We indiscriminately dumped fire
Speaker 1: into this crowd of women and children, and it's justified
Speaker 1: because we thought we might have been under attack. It's
Speaker 1: utterly despicable. Paramedics and rescuers said that at least twenty
Speaker 1: five people were also killed near a site run by
Speaker 1: the GHF in southern Gaza on Tuesday morning, when it's
Speaker 1: told the BBC he had gone to a site north
Speaker 1: of Rafa at five hundred, but shortly before it was
Speaker 1: due to open at ten, Israeli tanks advanced towards them
Speaker 1: and opened fire with no announcements. The shooting was directly
Speaker 1: on the civilians and blood got everywhere. Hatim Abu Bugele said,
Speaker 1: every one around us got wounded. There may be more
Speaker 1: than thirty wounded whom no one was able to rescue.
Speaker 1: We only managed to rescue our relative and left with him.
Speaker 1: The IDEF told the BBC that contrary to the reports
Speaker 1: being spread out, the IDEF is not aware of the
Speaker 1: incident in question at the Rapha A distribution site. I'm
Speaker 1: sure they wouldn't lie about that. I'm sure they wouldn't
Speaker 1: lie to cover up the murder of civilians.
Speaker 14: Now.
Speaker 1: The Israel would never lie. They're a greatest alley. They
Speaker 1: would never lie about an incident. Well, except when they
Speaker 1: lied about the U. S s. Celebrity. That's an easy
Speaker 1: one that comes to mind, doesn't it. When they killed
Speaker 1: so many of our people on a ship as a
Speaker 1: way to try to drag us into a war, but
Speaker 1: they wouldn't do that again. They would never dance gleefully
Speaker 1: in the streets after nine eleven. No, Israel's our greatest ally,
Speaker 1: and anyone that questions that is anti Semitic greatest ally
Speaker 1: murdering men, women and children with our blessing. Thanks Star Barkley,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for the tip. That is very
Speaker 1: generous and we appreciate it. Thanks for all you do.
Speaker 1: That is very kind. Glad that we can provide you
Speaker 1: with some hope. I hope that we're able to do that. Geesebusters,
Speaker 1: thank you very much. Geesebusters, that's generous. David get Well,
Speaker 1: that's right. We are all hoping he gets well, comes
Speaker 1: back soon. We're all praying for it. I ask it
Speaker 1: to continue to pray nights to the storm. I saw
Speaker 1: an ad on TV asking for a twenty dollars donation
Speaker 1: to feed starving people in Israel. I was like, what
Speaker 1: the hell? Some people holding up food for Palestinian children.
Speaker 1: What's up with all the money we are already sending there.
Speaker 1: That's right. If you watch Fox News, which I don't,
Speaker 1: but when it was on in a break room or
Speaker 1: some other place that I happened to be at the time,
Speaker 1: you would continually see these ads where some rabbi or
Speaker 1: some one is on TV saying, if you just give
Speaker 1: a few dollars a day, you can help feed these
Speaker 1: elderly Jewish women. They survived the Holocaust. You can help
Speaker 1: provide for them. Why isn't their own government providing for them.
Speaker 1: We're already sending you billions in aid in funding, in weapons.
Speaker 1: Why isn't your own government helping to feed these people
Speaker 1: that are apparently such a important part of your heritage.
Speaker 1: They mean so much to you, But it's not you
Speaker 1: that's going to feed them. You're going to once again
Speaker 1: soak these Zionist Christians who watch Fox News. You're going
Speaker 1: to get them to pay for their food, assuming any
Speaker 1: of that money actually makes it there and isn't siphoned
Speaker 1: off to something else through the charity. Who knows. It's
Speaker 1: a real wonder why they won't pay for it themselves
Speaker 1: see uh sejegi sedj CJ. Taxpayers continue to fund genocide.
Speaker 1: That's right, continuing to fund it. It doesn't stop. BB
Speaker 1: fumes after ID have soldiers confirmed lethal weapons routinely used
Speaker 1: on crowds at Gaza aid sites. How could you tell
Speaker 1: them that why are you giving away the secret? Don't
Speaker 1: acknowledge it. You're not supposed to. You're supposed to ignore it,
Speaker 1: pretend it doesn't happen. Soon after the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
Speaker 1: began distributing aid to war torn Gaza in May, disturbing
Speaker 1: reports emerged of Israeli soldiers killing unarmed Palestinians approaching aid
Speaker 1: points for food. This is from Zero Hedge. By the way,
Speaker 1: as the world's eyes turn from Gaza to Israel's attack
Speaker 1: on Iran, the pace of these reported killings and priest,
Speaker 1: that's right. When they don't have the eyes on them,
Speaker 1: when people aren't paying direct attention, they're allowed to do
Speaker 1: even more. They're allowed to get away with more, with
Speaker 1: multiple incidents claiming more than fifty lives each. Now, Israel's
Speaker 1: oldest daily newspaper has dropped a bombshell report with Israeli
Speaker 1: soldiers and officers confirming the routine use of deadly force
Speaker 1: on unarmed Palestinians as a barbaric form of crowd control,
Speaker 1: with a practice carried out under orders from superior officers.
Speaker 1: It is coming from the top down. It is a
Speaker 1: policy they have in place. Benjamin and Yahu's government is evil.
Speaker 1: It preys upon civilians. It is not just the terrorists
Speaker 1: in Hamas that they're targeting. That's the old refrain. Well,
Speaker 1: Hamas hides out among the civilians. So they just have
Speaker 1: to bomb indiscriminately. You know, if they get a tip
Speaker 1: that one of them is in an area, they just
Speaker 1: have to launch the bomb. It doesn't matter how many
Speaker 1: civilians might be there. Got to get rid of this
Speaker 1: one person. But this is beyond even that. This is
Speaker 1: them opening fire on crowds of civilians indiscriminately. They are
Speaker 1: just killing them. It is a genocide. We have a
Speaker 1: visitor to the studio employing this morning in Gaza, Palestiness
Speaker 1: went to receive American aid from the GHF, Israeli forces
Speaker 1: open fire in them, turning a humanitarian moment into a massacre.
Speaker 1: That is directly from the Times of Gaza, employing a
Speaker 1: rhetorical device frequently used when Israel is accused of lethal wrongdoing.
Speaker 1: That yeah, I dismissed the newspaper support as a blood
Speaker 1: libel against the IDF. That's right. Anything that criticizes or
Speaker 1: makes the Jewish people look bad is blood libel. That
Speaker 1: is the old way of describing it. They've used that
Speaker 1: term to obfuscate and get rid of criticism for a
Speaker 1: long time now. Israeli defense forces called these soldiers and
Speaker 1: officers accounts vicious life is designed to discredit the most
Speaker 1: moral army in the world. Isn't that wonderful? They're the
Speaker 1: most moral army in the world. The gall of Netanyahu
Speaker 1: to say this. We have whistleblowers from the army itself
Speaker 1: talking about how they routinely open fire on civilians, how
Speaker 1: it's orders from the higher ups. The most honorable army
Speaker 1: in the world. Isn't that wonderful? Our greatest ally at work, folks. Well,
Speaker 1: we've got about two and a half minutes left and
Speaker 1: I want to make sure that I thank the people.
Speaker 1: We've got some tips that came in on subscribe Star.
Speaker 14: Paul C.
Speaker 1: Just me eighty three. This is from and those are
Speaker 1: from subscriber Star. And this is from Zell Ryan F.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Ryan Craig P. Julie W. Bianca,
Speaker 1: s Andrew and Jason M. We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Your support is what keeps this program running. Thank you
Speaker 1: all so much, and please keep our father in your prayers.
Speaker 1: We want him back more than anyone else. I know
Speaker 1: that you all are eager for him to be back
Speaker 1: in this chair, so please continue to pray. We know
Speaker 1: that God is the one who heals, and we cannot
Speaker 1: thank you enough for all the prayers you have already
Speaker 1: sent up for him. Big brit is back against as
Speaker 1: how is Dave doing? He's doing better. He is doing better,
Speaker 1: especially physically. He's able to walk around a lot easier.
Speaker 1: But it's his vocal cords and the nerves and his
Speaker 1: tongue which are still giving him some trouble. So he
Speaker 1: asks that you pray for those ask that he would
Speaker 1: be able to speak clearly and easily again. But we
Speaker 1: are almost out of time. We've got about a minute
Speaker 1: and ten seconds left, so again, thank you all for
Speaker 1: the support you give us today. Thank you Minor Mike.
Speaker 1: He is tip matching today, so any tips that you
Speaker 1: sent in he will match. And of course if you
Speaker 1: want to donate after the show on zell or Subscribe
Speaker 1: Star or places like that, you still can cash app
Speaker 1: as well. We really do appreciate him matching tips. We're
Speaker 1: at about seventy five percent and today is the last day,
Speaker 1: so if you want to get your donation and help
Speaker 1: us reach the goal, get it right under the wire.
Speaker 1: We would appreciate it, and we cannot thank you all enough.
Speaker 1: It has been such a blessing to all of us.
Speaker 1: So thank you, Minor Mike, thank you to everyone who
Speaker 1: donated today. And of course this program would not be
Speaker 1: able to continue without you. That's the music, So that's
Speaker 1: my time. I want to thank you all for joining us.
Speaker 1: It is a pleasure to sit here with you all
Speaker 1: and go over these things with you. Please keep us
Speaker 1: all in your prayers, Dad for healing and us just
Speaker 1: to be able to continue to provide you with a
Speaker 1: good show. As I said, thank you all so much.
Speaker 1: God bless you all and have a wonderful rest of
Speaker 1: your day. I'll be back tomorrow.
Speaker 13: The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 13: our children. They created common past track and control us.
Speaker 13: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 13: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 13: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 13: created in the image of God.
Speaker 2: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 13: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 13: to know everything about us. While they hide everything from us.
Speaker 13: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 13: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 13: find at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, thank
Speaker 13: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 13: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com