Speaker 1: For years, the legacy media has ignored the fact that
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was connected to intelligence, and after his death
Speaker 1: they continued to ignore it. They acted like anybody who
Speaker 1: talked about that sort of thing as a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 1: And there's no evidence or proof. Meanwhile, anybody who's been
Speaker 1: following the case or had doug even a little bit
Speaker 1: deeper than the surface, understood what was really going on here.
Speaker 1: You didn't need to be an investigator to figure out
Speaker 1: what was going on here. You didn't need to be
Speaker 1: some sort of, you know, professional prosecutor to understand that
Speaker 1: Epstein was being protected from on high. But the legacy
Speaker 1: media willingly ignored all of it. And now that Epstein
Speaker 1: has been dead and actual investigative journalists and researchers have
Speaker 1: been digging into the case, now the legacy media wants
Speaker 1: to jump on board and say, oh, well, Epstein might
Speaker 1: have been connected to intelligence, he might have been a spy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: no shit, Welcome to the party, pal. Today's article is
Speaker 1: from Fox News and it's basically what I.
Speaker 2: Just talked about.
Speaker 1: Now. The headline is Jeffrey Epstein's alleged spy ties under
Speaker 1: fresh scrutiny and new book. Before, they wouldn't even run
Speaker 1: stuff like this on like Fox News or CNN or
Speaker 1: anything like that.
Speaker 2: And not that I find any.
Speaker 1: Of these outlets credible, because I do not, But I
Speaker 1: just find it hilarious that a few months ago everybody
Speaker 1: was a conspiracy theorist, and now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the legacy media is jumping on board.
Speaker 2: It's just like with Twitter.
Speaker 1: How they banned people when this whole entire COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: things started. There were banning people who were saying that
Speaker 1: it could have been a leak from a lab, not
Speaker 1: that it was is a chemical weapon released on the
Speaker 1: populace by the Chinese government, but a mistake and it
Speaker 1: could have you know, left the lab and contaminated the
Speaker 1: food market, et cetera, et cetera. Whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: But no way, the legacy media couldn't have it. You
Speaker 1: can't run a narrative counter to ours, and they're friends
Speaker 1: over at Twitter. Slick cut cut it back and started
Speaker 1: throwing people off of Twitter and canceling their accounts over it. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: it starts to come out now that they're that that's
Speaker 1: kind of that story. There has legs that that's definitely
Speaker 1: an option, that's definitely a possibility.
Speaker 2: See the legacy media, what.
Speaker 1: They want to do is control the narrative at all costs,
Speaker 1: and they they they're very good at it. They've been
Speaker 1: doing it forever. And now that other people are getting
Speaker 1: involved as citizen journalists and investigative journalists, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 1: they're losing their grip on the narrative and they understand
Speaker 1: that they are no longer in control and they better
Speaker 1: get with the times. So you're seeing a lot more
Speaker 1: of the legacy media now starting to pick up on
Speaker 1: what was used to be considered a conspiracy theory. But
Speaker 1: for us that have been following the case, we know
Speaker 1: it's not a conspiracy theory. We know it's a cover up,
Speaker 1: all right. So headline Jeffrey Epstein's alleged spy ties under
Speaker 1: fresh scrutiny and new book again. This is on foxnews
Speaker 1: dot com and the author is Holly McKay. The life
Speaker 1: and death of Jeffrey Epstein remains something of a sordid
Speaker 1: mystery movie. Say that again. More than ten months since
Speaker 1: his shocking death, it is still unclear how the disgraced
Speaker 1: financier pedophile rose through the ranks to a mass a
Speaker 1: black book of high profile contacts and world leaders. Why
Speaker 1: he was able to enter such a quietly negotiated sweetheart
Speaker 1: plea deal in two thousand and seven despite a sex
Speaker 1: offender conviction, the conditions of which he was left to
Speaker 1: supposedly take his own life in Manhattan, in a Manhattan
Speaker 1: jail cell. And precisely how the self styled billionaire financier
Speaker 1: pedophile made his many millions. And there are many different
Speaker 1: avenues to explore Jeffrey Epstein. When he was at Baron Stearns,
Speaker 1: you know, he was involved in some scumbaggery. You know,
Speaker 1: he was involved in some fraudulent money crimes, and he
Speaker 1: just built on that going forward. The man look for
Speaker 1: all of his disgusting faults. The man knew how to
Speaker 1: manipulate the financial system. He knew how to launder money,
Speaker 1: he knew how to finesse Title thirty one regulations.
Speaker 2: And this was a man who was.
Speaker 1: Able to do all of that not just because he
Speaker 1: was slick, not just because he understood the financial system,
Speaker 1: but because his friends were the ones who wrote the laws.
Speaker 1: His friends were the ones who advised him how to
Speaker 1: use those loopholes and those friends are the same people
Speaker 1: people are putting up on a pedestal and worshiping as
Speaker 1: these fantastic politicians who care about us breaking news everybody.
Speaker 1: They do not care about you. A recently released book
Speaker 1: purports to shed light at least on the ladder, revealing
Speaker 1: that he may have had he may have made at
Speaker 1: least some big bucks and granted something of a free
Speaker 1: pass for his decades of wrongdoing through covert intelligent intelligence action. Well,
Speaker 1: Fox News, it's about time that you have something like
Speaker 1: this on your website. I mean, it's obvious that Epstein
Speaker 1: had ties to intelligence. It's obvious that Acosto is told
Speaker 1: to keep his hands off of Epstein for that very reason,
Speaker 1: And it is also obvious that the CIA has their
Speaker 1: thumbprints everywhere in this case. Again, I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people want to foist all the blame on the
Speaker 1: Masade here. I'm not one of those people. Do I
Speaker 1: believe the Massade played their role? Absolutely? Do I believe
Speaker 1: that they were the ones who came up with the plot. Probably,
Speaker 1: But as far as facilitating it in the United States
Speaker 1: of America, there is zero chance that the Massad was
Speaker 1: doing this covertly. There is zero chance of it people,
Speaker 1: the CIA knows all. And if you think that an
Speaker 1: operation like this was being run by just the Masad,
Speaker 1: you are not paying attention because Jeffrey Epstein was being
Speaker 1: worked by multiple intelligence.
Speaker 2: Services, multiple folks.
Speaker 1: While the notion of Epstein as a spy has long
Speaker 1: run rampant in the rumor mill, the book Epstein, Dead
Speaker 1: Men Tell No Tales, authored by Dylan Howard, Melissa Cronnin,
Speaker 1: and James Robertson, proclaims that he had ties to MASAD,
Speaker 1: the Israeli National Intelligence Agency. And to shout out to
Speaker 1: Melissa Kronnin, she does great work. She's really fantastic and
Speaker 1: I really enjoyed this book Epstein, Dead Men Tell No Tales,
Speaker 1: and I highly suggest that you pick it up if
Speaker 1: you have it yet. I'm going to try and reach
Speaker 1: out to Melissa Kranen as well and see if maybe
Speaker 1: she wants to pop onto the podcast and talk with
Speaker 1: us about her book.
Speaker 2: When we set out to write.
Speaker 1: A book about his crimes, we thought we knew the
Speaker 1: whole story before long. However, what we uncovered was compelling
Speaker 1: evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was a spy largely for Israel's
Speaker 1: Masade and allowed to operate in the United States seemingly
Speaker 1: without consequence. Dylan Howard told Fox News, this is a
Speaker 1: much bigger story than the world has ever known and
Speaker 1: is continually being ignored and glossed over in much of
Speaker 1: the new reporting about Epstein. One hundred percent, Dylan Howard,
Speaker 1: my man, this is what we need. We need people
Speaker 1: like him and Melissa Kronnen and the rest of these folks.
Speaker 1: When they come on to shows like this, it's it
Speaker 1: does the whole case good because these are people that
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about. These are people that have
Speaker 1: researched what is going on. And these aren't people that
Speaker 1: are shooting from the hip. They aren't just thrown out
Speaker 1: pie in the sky conspiracy theories. These are well thought out,
Speaker 1: well researched avenues of discussion here, and the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: legacy media, has done us as such a disservice by
Speaker 1: not putting their feet all the way into the water
Speaker 1: here and just dipping a toe in. We need a full,
Speaker 1: a full investigation into all of this, all the different threads,
Speaker 1: all of the different people involved, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: What we need is an all encompassing documentary, one that
Speaker 1: touches on everything. You know, I'm talking a ten part
Speaker 1: series where we can really delve into everything. If I
Speaker 1: have the ability to do something like that, that is
Speaker 1: what I would put all of my time and effort into,
Speaker 1: is making a documentary and all encompassing documentary that spans
Speaker 1: ten episodes that really digs into everything that is right
Speaker 1: below the surface, talks about all the players, the du Bins,
Speaker 1: the Wexners, etc.
Speaker 2: Etc. We really need something like that in this case.
Speaker 1: Indeed, Epstein's political associations over the years were numerous, ranging
Speaker 1: from President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and the
Speaker 1: UK's Prince Andrew and former Prime Minister Tony Blair to
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salomon and former Israeli
Speaker 1: Prime Minister at Hood Barack. Now look, those of you
Speaker 1: who know me know that my core of study has
Speaker 1: been the geopolitical situation in the Middle East, and when
Speaker 1: it comes to Saudi Arabia and it comes to sick
Speaker 1: behavior by these sort of people, these royals, these sultans,
Speaker 1: these oil barons within Saudi Arabia and the Middle East,
Speaker 1: I can completely confirm that some sordid, disgusting shit takes place.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to jump into details of that here
Speaker 1: on the podcast because it's not really relevant. But what
Speaker 1: I will say is you can always, you know, have
Speaker 1: an idea about people by the company they keep. Right,
Speaker 1: and when Epstein the way he would hang out with
Speaker 1: these disgusting oil barons. What do you think he was
Speaker 1: just over there discussing business folks, or do you think
Speaker 1: he was partaking in whatever six sorted.
Speaker 2: I don't even want to talk.
Speaker 1: I don't even want to think about what was going
Speaker 1: on in places like that. He Epstein used his power
Speaker 1: to exploit the vulnerable and underaged, all the while covering
Speaker 1: his tracks with the innermost circles of the establishment. He
Speaker 1: used his access to trap the rich and famous and
Speaker 1: traded in the dirty ad on them to the world's
Speaker 1: most secretive intelligence agencies. Howard continued, The conclusion of our
Speaker 1: reporting is clear. Epstein was a spy running a complex
Speaker 1: intelligence operation for the purpose of blackmailing powerful individuals and
Speaker 1: politicians in the United States and abroad. But for whom,
Speaker 1: And that is the lingering question for those of us
Speaker 1: who have been followed the case. Right, we know he's
Speaker 1: being run by intelligence services and in my opinion, like
Speaker 1: I've said, he is probably an asset of Masad, But
Speaker 1: I believe the overarching picture is being painted by the CIA.
Speaker 1: Nobody is going to convince me the CIA's dirty fingers
Speaker 1: weren't all over this. Zero chance that that happens, and
Speaker 1: zero chance anyone can convince me of that without a
Speaker 1: lot stuff of strong evidence. Epstein himself was purportedly known
Speaker 1: to tell others that he had dirt on powerful people,
Speaker 1: raising red flags as to whether prominent individuals were either
Speaker 1: lured into his illicit sex ring and then forced to
Speaker 1: pay up or keep quiet. And we know that's the case.
Speaker 1: We know that there's dossier's on all of these people,
Speaker 1: and we also know which not many people talk about.
Speaker 1: But it's something I've hammered home here on this podcast,
Speaker 1: is that the academics that were around Jeffrey Epstein were
Speaker 1: very guilty. They are very much involved in this, and
Speaker 1: in my opinion, they are all also passing on science
Speaker 1: secrets to Jeffrey Epstein too, classified projects, etc.
Speaker 2: Et cetera.
Speaker 1: And what he did with those, in my estimation, was
Speaker 1: he sold those to foreign intelligence agencies. My friends, how
Speaker 1: much more of a perfect picture do you need? Painted
Speaker 1: before you understand that this man, this disgusting piece of
Speaker 1: human excrement, Jeffrey Epstein was working for intelligence. Soon after
Speaker 1: Epstein was arrested by federal officials at Teterborough Airport in
Speaker 1: New Jersey last year on a fresh round of trafficking charges,
Speaker 1: then US Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta came under fire
Speaker 1: for his role in overseeing the two thousand and seven
Speaker 1: Epstein deal while a US attorney in Miami. Again, Acosta
Speaker 1: a part of the plot, right, definitely a yes man,
Speaker 1: but it went much higher than that. Folks don't just
Speaker 1: focus on Acosta like they try to make you do.
Speaker 1: You gotta dig deeper. It's easy just to say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: this is all a Costa's fault, but that's not how
Speaker 1: it works in the Justice Department. For something like that
Speaker 1: that has to get kicked all the way up top.
Speaker 1: That's a Mukesi type deal. So we have to dig
Speaker 1: deeper there. And don't get me wrong, her Costa deserve
Speaker 1: to be fired, and he should have resigned. But if
Speaker 1: we act like the buck just stops there, we're never
Speaker 1: going to dig deep enough. Moreover, questions still swirl as
Speaker 1: it pertains to his once girlfriend, co conspirator and confidant,
Speaker 1: Glaine Maxwell, who has been widely accused of aiding his
Speaker 1: solicitation of underage girls for sex. And how and why
Speaker 1: she has flown under the radar since his arrest by
Speaker 1: the FBI last summer and his subsequent death. Well, we
Speaker 1: know why she's still being protected. If Jeffrey Berman was
Speaker 1: serious about his job, if Jeffrey Berman really wanted to
Speaker 1: bring justice to these survivors, he'd send out his boys,
Speaker 1: the g men, to go and swoop Gilaine Maxwell up
Speaker 1: and get this party started. Now, we have seen some
Speaker 1: movement looking like there's some things going on behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: but we don't have any concrete evidence one way or
Speaker 1: the other. Right, So, Glaine Maxwell, somehow, some way is
Speaker 1: still ducking and dodging justice. A page six report earlier
Speaker 1: this year cited an unnamed source indicating that she had
Speaker 1: intelligence ties of her own, thus is protected because of
Speaker 1: the information she has on the world's most powerful people
Speaker 1: and was being kept in safe houses. Look, she is
Speaker 1: definitely being protected. The government has the ability to find
Speaker 1: people no matter where they are in the world for
Speaker 1: the most part. Meanwhile, Gilaine Maxwell is pulling the hoky
Speaker 1: dokie on the federal government. She's being protected for sure
Speaker 1: by the same services that are supposed to be looking
Speaker 1: for her. That is definitely where I'm at. That is
Speaker 1: most certainly my opinion at this point. Maxwell's own father,
Speaker 1: British press baron Robert Maxwell, was plagued by conspiracies that
Speaker 1: he too, was an undercover intelligence operative for Israel. That's
Speaker 1: not a conspiracy theory. You don't get a state run
Speaker 1: funeral the way Bob Maxwell got. If you didn't, you know,
Speaker 1: you weren't helping out the nation of Israel.
Speaker 2: Stop it, just stop it.
Speaker 1: It's obvious, Okay, It is rather obvious that Robert Maxwell
Speaker 1: was not only a spy for Israel, but that he
Speaker 1: had connections to the CIA and also the KGB.
Speaker 2: Much of the.
Speaker 1: Explosive claims made in the new book come from the
Speaker 1: Iranian born self proclaimed former Israeli spy Ari Ben Manash,
Speaker 1: who says he served as the handler for Robert Maxwell
Speaker 1: and introduced Gilian Maxwell, Epstein and Masad. We've heard that
Speaker 1: along earlier on in the case. We talked about this,
Speaker 1: We talked about Ari Ben Manash and what he had
Speaker 1: this and he's credible. What he has to say is credible, folks,
Speaker 1: And of course the establishment's going to deny it. Of
Speaker 1: course they're going to try and destroy him and hit
Speaker 1: him with a hatchet job because they don't want to
Speaker 1: lose their hold on the narrative. Remember, information is the
Speaker 1: most precious and expensive commodity. However, Israel denied Minasha's intelligence
Speaker 1: links soon after. He was arrested in nineteen eighty nine
Speaker 1: in the US on charges of arms dealing. However, he
Speaker 1: was acquitted the following year. Oh, I'm sure he was.
Speaker 1: I'm sure George Bush and his CIA ties stepped right
Speaker 1: in to make sure that the arms dealer was acquitted
Speaker 1: and he was back in action doing whatever it is
Speaker 1: that the CIA had planned for him. Mister Epstein was
Speaker 1: the simple idiot who was going around providing girls to
Speaker 1: all kinds of politicians in the United States. See ef
Speaker 1: and around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing,
Speaker 1: but it's not a crime. But having sex with a
Speaker 1: fourteen year old girl is a crime. A passage attributed
Speaker 1: to Ben Manash reads in the book. And he was
Speaker 1: taking photos of politicians efing fourteen year old girls. If
Speaker 1: you want to get it straight, they would just blackmail people.
Speaker 1: They would just blackmail people like that, And folks, we
Speaker 1: know that this is the case, and we get more
Speaker 1: confirmation here from Ari Ben Manash, but we know from
Speaker 1: the survivors themselves what was going on here. All of
Speaker 1: this is just butter on the bread for me, or
Speaker 1: like I always say, a little more meat on the bone, right,
Speaker 1: the more meat on the bone, the better the dish.
Speaker 1: And that's what's going on here. So it's a slow trickle,
Speaker 1: but eventually it's going to build up to a huge gusher.
Speaker 1: And that's where we're at right now. Because we're hearing
Speaker 1: from guys like Ari Ben Manash, We're hearing from the
Speaker 1: authors of the book, Melissa Cronnin, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 1: and more and more, the legacy media is being forced
Speaker 1: to understand that this is not a conspiracy theory, that
Speaker 1: this is not just some bs we we're throwing against
Speaker 1: the wall here. This is a cover up of epic
Speaker 1: proportions that spans continents, folks. Nonetheless, the unanswered questions as
Speaker 1: they pertain to Epstein still abound. According to Dylan, Epstein
Speaker 1: used the classic honey trap or love trap as it
Speaker 1: is sometimes known, to build as blackmail files. We called
Speaker 1: this out from the very beginning as somebody who has
Speaker 1: spent many, many, many, many many many hours researching the
Speaker 1: Middle East and the geopolitical situation in Gaza, the West Bank, Israel.
Speaker 2: Syria, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: This is a hallmark of the masade. They love setting
Speaker 1: up honey traps. You know how many moms they've caught
Speaker 1: up in this, how many members of Hamas they've caught
Speaker 1: up in this, and then they've used that information to
Speaker 1: turn them into assets for them. This is as this,
Speaker 1: this was old when Babylon was young.
Speaker 2: Folks.
Speaker 1: Even for those who did not fall for his ruse,
Speaker 1: their simple presence in his orbit was enough for Epstein
Speaker 1: to gather intelligence.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 1: Epstein was calculated. He rubbed shoulders with those who could
Speaker 1: unwittingly provide him information and intelligence. For sure, That was hismo.
Speaker 1: His whole entire plan and plot was to get on
Speaker 1: the inside and either egg compile dossiers on these people
Speaker 1: so he could blackmail them or try and pilfer information.
Speaker 2: Any way he could.
Speaker 1: And while the criminal case against Epstein was subsequently dropped
Speaker 1: as a result of his death, civil suits put forward
Speaker 1: by alleged survivors of his purported sex ring, and squabbles
Speaker 1: over his estate and finances continue. Just last week, a
Speaker 1: leading law enforcement official in the US Virgin Islands, where
Speaker 1: Epstein owned his islands, demanded to know why Epstein's estate
Speaker 1: has not yet explained our regularities in a series of
Speaker 1: unexplained transactions involving some thirty nine million dollars before and
Speaker 1: after his death, according to The New York Times, Well,
Speaker 1: we talked about.
Speaker 2: That as well.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of irregularities here, all right, a lot
Speaker 1: of irregularities with money. So I don't understand how just
Speaker 1: that alone doesn't have all of these people brought in
Speaker 1: Enrico indictments. In a court filing last week, Denise George,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General for the US Virgin Islands, stated that
Speaker 1: she was against removing a criminal activity lean she placed
Speaker 1: on a six hundred million dollar estate given the sex
Speaker 1: trafficking indictment filed by the DOJ before he died. She
Speaker 1: pointed to the unrecognized thirty nine million dollars worth of
Speaker 1: transactions pertaining to Southern Country International and international banking entity
Speaker 1: Epstein set up in twenty fourteen to handle funds only
Speaker 1: from non domestic customers. George thus stated that some of
Speaker 1: the transactions seemingly breached the banker's charter.
Speaker 2: Yeah, of course they do.
Speaker 1: What do you think there is that just happened because
Speaker 1: the regulators set it up that way so that people
Speaker 1: on their island wouldn't be getting scanned. That of Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: but the rest of us Bach who cares? Let them
Speaker 1: all get scammed. Let Epstein make a killing on the
Speaker 1: rest of the people. Again, another reason why I am
Speaker 1: not a fan of the Virgin Islands trying to set
Speaker 1: themselves up as some sort of victim. In this case,
Speaker 1: Fox News cannot independently verify the spy claim set out
Speaker 1: in the book, but it may.
Speaker 2: All just be the tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 1: Howard noted that others have more recently reached out with
Speaker 1: firsthand a vowels of Epstein's intel ties. I do not
Speaker 1: believe Epstein worked exclusively for the Masade. I believe many
Speaker 1: countries sought information from him, and he also shopped information
Speaker 1: to the highest bidder. It also helps explain how Epstein
Speaker 1: was able to build a puzzling billion dollar fortune, Howard added,
Speaker 1: So not only was Epstein running a shocking criminal enterprise
Speaker 1: as described by the FBI, but it was one of
Speaker 1: the deep business and intelligence ties across a number of countries.
Speaker 2: Folks, how long have I been telling you this? How
Speaker 2: long have I been sitting here?
Speaker 1: You're yelling and screaming from the mountaintops about this, months,
Speaker 1: months and months and months. I'm so happy to see
Speaker 1: that Melissa Kronnin and Dylan Howard wrote this book because
Speaker 1: it really does shed some light on what's going on.
Speaker 1: And if you have not picked this book up yet,
Speaker 1: I highly suggest you do grab it, read it, and
Speaker 1: like usual, process the information for yourself, follow the evidence
Speaker 1: for yourself. Folks. You know that's what I'm always talking
Speaker 1: about here. Don't believe anybody follow the evidence for yourself.
Speaker 1: Do the research, do the legwork. And when you read
Speaker 1: all of these articles and you put them together and
Speaker 1: you start following the breadcrumbs when you get to the
Speaker 1: destination that you seek, it is jaw dropping what you find.
Speaker 2: And books like this.
Speaker 1: And books like Bradley Edwards book, they're very important editions
Speaker 1: if you are really serious about finding the truth in
Speaker 1: this case. All right, folks, if you'd like to contact me,
Speaker 1: you could do that at Bobby Kapucci at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 1: That's bobbycap u Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can
Speaker 1: also find me on Twitter at Bobby Underscore cap u Cci.
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
Speaker 1: Virginia Roberts had a post on Twitter where she was
Speaker 1: asking if anyone else believed that Jeffrey Epstein was a
Speaker 1: spy and he was working for the Macade or the CIA.
Speaker 1: And I think this is probably the question I get
Speaker 1: the most when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and how
Speaker 1: he was able to do what he was able to do,
Speaker 1: And I think the answer is somewhere in the middle.
Speaker 1: I don't think that Jeffrey Epstein was your traditional spy,
Speaker 1: if you will, but I think he was an asset
Speaker 1: that was being run by multiple agencies and was there
Speaker 1: some over with the CIA and the Masad, Oh, I'm
Speaker 1: sure there was. But there's a lot of people out
Speaker 1: there that act like Jeffrey Epstein was a legit Masad spy,
Speaker 1: like he went to spy school in Israel and the
Speaker 1: rest of it, and that's just.
Speaker 2: Not the case.
Speaker 1: So for me, they're zero doubt that this guy was
Speaker 1: an asset, but a full blown spy in the traditional
Speaker 1: sense of the word, I don't think so. Look, these
Speaker 1: intelligence agencies, they recognize tools that they can use to
Speaker 1: perpetrate whatever sort of scheme or plot that they have.
Speaker 1: But the second that the asset's usefulness has worn out,
Speaker 1: or if the asset is deemed to be somebody that
Speaker 1: might expose the rest of the operation, that asset will
Speaker 1: get burned. And considering Jeffrey Epstein's fate, I don't think
Speaker 1: it's that big of a leap to say that that's
Speaker 1: what happened here. Now I'm not saying that they killed
Speaker 1: him per se, But what message did Tartaglioni give Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein in that cell when they were in that cell
Speaker 1: together and Tartaglioni allegedly assaulted him. I have always believed
Speaker 1: that that assault was a message being passed to Epstein
Speaker 1: by somebody who that somebody is. I won't sit here
Speaker 1: and make pretend I know. But considering all of the
Speaker 1: coincidences surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death, considering the fact that all
Speaker 1: this information was about to come spilling out, you would
Speaker 1: have to think that there's a lot of powerful people
Speaker 1: out there that aren't too comfortable or weren't too comfortable
Speaker 1: with that information about to make its way into the public.
Speaker 1: So I've always believed that there's way more to the
Speaker 1: story with Nicholas Tartaglioni than they've ever let on. And
Speaker 1: we only got a little portion of that story. And
Speaker 1: even in the OIG report that some people point to
Speaker 1: as if it's some kind of bible or something, we
Speaker 1: got barely a mention of what happened with Tartaglioni. And
Speaker 1: then we hear about the lay mass investigation that they
Speaker 1: kicked off in the aftermath of it, basically just asking him,
Speaker 1: did you do this? He says no, and then they
Speaker 1: move on. Then you move into the area where the
Speaker 1: tape has been destroyed or it's been lost. You know,
Speaker 1: all of it. And for me, none of the explanations
Speaker 1: that I've been given by the powers that be have
Speaker 1: been good enough explanations, and in fact, they only open
Speaker 1: up more questions. So moving on to the article from
Speaker 1: Newsweek and the headline Prince Andrew's accuser shares Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 1: spy theory. This article was authored by Jack Royston. Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew's accuser posted a link to a Reddit post suggesting
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was a Masade or CIA spy. Virginia Roberts
Speaker 1: sued the Royal for sexual assault in London, New York
Speaker 1: and the US Virgin Islands. When they settled out of
Speaker 1: court in twenty twenty two for an undisclosed sum, Andrew
Speaker 1: acknowledged that she was an Epstein sex trafficking victim. The
Speaker 1: Prince denied the allegation against them. Imagine trying to get
Speaker 1: off with that nonsense. Yeah, I'm gonna deny these allegations.
Speaker 1: But let me give you this bag real quick. Conspiracy theorists, boy,
Speaker 1: that's a whot, have long speculated about whether Epstein's wide
Speaker 1: ranging sexual abuse was part of an elaborate campaign to
Speaker 1: acquire compromising material about high profile figures and politicians on
Speaker 1: behalf of intelligence agencies. Newsweek has no definitive evidence to
Speaker 1: back up this account and no official confirmation, but it's
Speaker 1: not entirely without foundation. Look, I don't think there's any
Speaker 1: doubt that good old Jeffrey Epstein was being run as
Speaker 1: an asset. Now, who is handler was? Who was in
Speaker 1: charge of it all? I have no idea and all
Speaker 1: the people out here that pump the bs like they know, well,
Speaker 1: I'd like to see the proof. Remember, big claims require
Speaker 1: big proof. And when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and
Speaker 1: people who say that they have proof, who say that
Speaker 1: they have all this evidence, well, well, I'm a trust
Speaker 1: but verify kind of guy. At this point, if you
Speaker 1: get my drift, considering all the grifters and snake oil
Speaker 1: salesmen and bullshit artists that have made their way through
Speaker 1: this whole thing, I think that at this point it's
Speaker 1: either put up or shut up for me. But as
Speaker 1: far as the overall question, was he working for spy agencies?
Speaker 1: Was he an asset? I think the answer is definitively yes.
Speaker 1: The part that still murky is who he was working
Speaker 1: for in the first place, and I have my suspicions
Speaker 1: that it wasn't just one intelligence agency. Now I think
Speaker 1: that Epstein was a tool of the United States government
Speaker 1: at least as far as being used as a snitch.
Speaker 1: And Folks, you don't avoid going to prison in all
Speaker 1: of the scandals that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in throughout
Speaker 1: all of these years if you're not working with the government.
Speaker 1: He was making the same moves like Whitey Bulger. The
Speaker 1: question is who was Jeffrey Epstein's handler? And I think
Speaker 1: it's a long shot of long shots that were ever
Speaker 1: gonna find out who that handler was. Roberts posted a
Speaker 1: link on Twitter to a Reddit post that asked, does
Speaker 1: anyone else here believe Epstein in all likelihood was a
Speaker 1: masad CIA linked intelligence agent that was responsible for helping
Speaker 1: run a black mail honeypot ring to entrap elite oligarchs?
Speaker 1: And yeah, look, there's a lot to that. There's no
Speaker 1: doubt that Epstein dealt in information, and when you get
Speaker 1: to the level that these people are at, information is
Speaker 1: worth more than even money. But I think it even
Speaker 1: went deeper than that. Remember that Jeffrey Epstein was always
Speaker 1: hanging out with these scientists too. Ask yourself why what
Speaker 1: sort of projects were these scientists working on? And were
Speaker 1: any of those projects top secret? And if they were,
Speaker 1: what was Epstein doing with the information that he was
Speaker 1: getting from these scientists. That's a question that is very
Speaker 1: rarely asked. But for me, when I went to New
Speaker 1: Mexico and I went down to the Santa Fe Institute,
Speaker 1: there there was way too many questions that needed to
Speaker 1: be answered. And still to this day, those questions remain unanswered,
Speaker 1: and a lot of it has to do with Epstein
Speaker 1: and his dalliance is with the scientific community. Based off
Speaker 1: all of Epstein's known dubious activities, the Post added across
Speaker 1: the vast wealth obvious connections to the Israeli Massad. Glenn
Speaker 1: Maxwell's dad was Robert Maxwell, a powerful British oligarch with
Speaker 1: Massad ties. And Epstein's suspicious murder that's been covered up
Speaker 1: as a suicide, I think a strong argument could be
Speaker 1: made Epstein was indeed an intelligence agent who helped run
Speaker 1: a black mal honeypot operation that most likely is still
Speaker 1: running to this day. Well in some form. Well you
Speaker 1: think they just gave up when their buddy Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: ended up sleeping with the fishes. Zero chance. Look, when
Speaker 1: these guys latch onto a scheme that works, the scheme
Speaker 1: is going to keep going on. The players are going
Speaker 1: to change, but the scheme is, Well, it was effective
Speaker 1: then it'll be effective now. And please make no mistake,
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein is just the tip of the iceberg. It's
Speaker 1: important to state that there is no on the record
Speaker 1: confirmation from the US or any other intelligence that Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein was a spy. In addition, his cause of death
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen was recorded by suicide by hanging by
Speaker 1: the New York City's Medical Examiner's Office. Well, that clears
Speaker 1: it up for me, because the New York Medical Examiner's
Speaker 1: Office says that it was a suicide. Time to pack
Speaker 1: it up, folks, Nothing left to see here. Let's just
Speaker 1: go ahead and move on with our lives and our business.
Speaker 1: Everything that happened in that jail cell on the up
Speaker 1: and up, everything that happened with Epstein from the time
Speaker 1: of his incarceration until the time of his death. If
Speaker 1: you think anything besides what was in that OIG report,
Speaker 1: you're a conspiracy theorist. That's basically what the legacy media
Speaker 1: would have people believe. But the reality is this, the
Speaker 1: legacy media, like usual, is late to the party, and
Speaker 1: like usual, they have no idea what they're talking about
Speaker 1: when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. However, this is not
Speaker 1: the first time it has been suggested that the New
Speaker 1: York financier financier is it you mean pedophile right, mister
Speaker 1: Royston may have had links to the intelligence community. The
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen book Epstein. Dead Men Tell No Tales by
Speaker 1: Dylan Howard, James Robertson and Melissa Cronnin quotes Aery Ben Minosh,
Speaker 1: said to be an Israeli intelligence agent and handler to
Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell. In the late nineteen eighties. Epstein dated British
Speaker 1: newspaper magnate Maxwell's daughter, Glene Maxwell, if you want to
Speaker 1: call it that, who is serving twenty years in jail,
Speaker 1: Still not long enough and for grooming girls for Epstein
Speaker 1: to abuse. Mister Royston also left out the little part
Speaker 1: here where Maxwell actually participated in the abuse herself. Kind
Speaker 1: of an important part, No, And as for dating Glenn Maxwell,
Speaker 1: it's a pretty damn good cover story, right, Ben Manash said,
Speaker 1: Maxwell introduced him to us, and he wanted us to
Speaker 1: accept them as part of our group. These guys were
Speaker 1: seen as agents, he added, they weren't really competent to
Speaker 1: do very much, and they found a niche for themselves
Speaker 1: blackmailing American and other political figures. In conclusion, Ben Manash
Speaker 1: said to the authors, mister Epstein was a simple idiot
Speaker 1: who was going around providing girls to all kinds of
Speaker 1: politicians in the United States see EFN. Around is not
Speaker 1: a crime it could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime.
Speaker 1: But f a fourteen year old girl, that's a crime.
Speaker 1: And he was taking photos of politicians doing that with
Speaker 1: fourteen year old girls, if you want to get it straight.
Speaker 1: Ben Manash added, they Epstein and Maxwell would just blackmail people.
Speaker 1: They would just blackmail people like that. And look, there
Speaker 1: is a lot of truth in everything that was said
Speaker 1: by mister ben Manosh. And as far as the authors
Speaker 1: of that book go, Melissa Cronin certainly knows what she's
Speaker 1: talking about. But you hear from mister ben Manash here
Speaker 1: that Epstein was an idiot. He certainly wasn't a functioning
Speaker 1: massad agent or a CIA agent, but an asset, a
Speaker 1: useful idiot. One hundred percent. Those are the favorite kind
Speaker 1: of tools of the CIA, of the masade. Vicky Ward,
Speaker 1: who's reporting for Vanity Fair played a role in the
Speaker 1: Epstein scandal, wrote in a piece for Rolling Stone magazine
Speaker 1: that the notorious financier pedophile told exaggerated stories of his
Speaker 1: time in intelligence circles, but some of those stories may
Speaker 1: have been at least partially true. Ward quoted a former
Speaker 1: business partner of Epstein, Stephen Hoffenberg, whom the disgraced financier
Speaker 1: testified against during a criminal prosecution. Hoffenberg said that Epstein
Speaker 1: had talked about links to the intelligence community, and when
Speaker 1: I said he was a snitch for the government, this
Speaker 1: is what I mean. He took the stand and signed
Speaker 1: a three zero two, signed a profer agreement with the
Speaker 1: government to put Steve Hoffenberg behind bars. Meanwhile, it was
Speaker 1: Epstein who was the mastermind of that whole last scheme.
Speaker 1: So what you think Once the government had Epstein on paper,
Speaker 1: that was the end of it. They were like, Ah,
Speaker 1: you know what, this guy isn't going to be useful anymore.
Speaker 1: Let's just forget about him. Zero chance. They're not going
Speaker 1: to waste an asset like that until it's time to
Speaker 1: waste an asset like that. These related to national security
Speaker 1: issues involving blackmail, influence, trading, trading information at a level
Speaker 1: that is very serious and dangerous. Ultimately, short of official confirmation,
Speaker 1: it is impossible to know with any certainty whether Epstein
Speaker 1: had links to intelligence agencies or not, and if so,
Speaker 1: how strong those links are. Either way, the idea is
Speaker 1: not concocted out of thin air, as many conspiracy theories are. Well,
Speaker 1: that's because this is not a conspiracy theory. In my opinion,
Speaker 1: this is a fact. We just have to hammer out
Speaker 1: all the details. Right. I can't give you particulars because
Speaker 1: I don't know, But what I can tell you is
Speaker 1: the aberrant behavior that was shown by Epstein and the
Speaker 1: favorable punishment that was handed down to Epstein, and the
Speaker 1: ability of Epstein to continue to do what he did
Speaker 1: for all those years. That is not normal, and most
Speaker 1: people aren't afforded the space to operate like Jeffrey Epstein was.
Speaker 1: So do I think that Jeffrey Epstein was a Masad spy,
Speaker 1: Not in the traditional sense. I do think that him
Speaker 1: and Maxwell were both assets and they were being run
Speaker 1: by multiple agencies. But like most things, when it comes
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein, we're left to wonder what's real and
Speaker 1: what's not, and in my opinion, that's always been by design.
Speaker 1: All right, folks, that's gonna do it for this one.
Speaker 1: If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
Speaker 1: at Bobby Kopuci at Protonmeil dot com. That's Bobby capu Cci,
Speaker 1: protonmel dot com. All of the information that goes with
Speaker 1: this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
Speaker 1: and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. Recently we have
Speaker 1: a new interview out from Glene Maxwell, and the person
Speaker 1: who was able to get that interview was Daphne Barock. Well,
Speaker 1: her dad is Ehud Barock, who was very close and
Speaker 1: in fact the business partner of Jeffrey Epstein's. We've talked
Speaker 1: about Lhwud Barock several times here on the podcast before,
Speaker 1: and today we're going to talk about him once again,
Speaker 1: considering that according to the Times of Israel, him and
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein were business partners all the way up until
Speaker 1: at least twenty fifteen. Now to hear Barock tell it,
Speaker 1: he'll tell you he had no idea what Epstein was,
Speaker 1: who he was, or what he was up to. And
Speaker 1: I guess you can try and use that defense. But
Speaker 1: when you're the ex Prime Minister of Israel, somebody who
Speaker 1: is so connected and so locked in to the going
Speaker 1: ons of the world, and then you have a daughter
Speaker 1: who is a documentarian as well as a filmmaker, I
Speaker 1: find it very very hard to believe that you didn't
Speaker 1: know what kind of man Jeffrey Epstein was. But here
Speaker 1: we are, all these years later, and this is another
Speaker 1: person who very rarely comes up in conversation. So let's
Speaker 1: go back to twenty and nineteen and let's check on
Speaker 1: this article from the Times of Israel headline Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was at hood Barack's business partner as late as twenty
Speaker 1: and fifteen. Former PM's connection to financier pedophile accused of
Speaker 1: sex trafficking Miners becomes an issue ahead of national elections
Speaker 1: in September. You know, it's hilarious, right, It's only an
Speaker 1: issue because there's an election. Shouldn't this be an issue
Speaker 1: at any time, But it just shows you once again
Speaker 1: how people have tried to use this and manipulate this
Speaker 1: situation forever and try and score political points with it.
Speaker 1: This article was authored by the Times of Israel staff.
Speaker 1: American financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender now
Speaker 1: embroiled in a sex trafficking case involving miners, was an
Speaker 1: active business partner with former Prime Minister Elhwud Barock as
Speaker 1: late as twenty and fifteen. Now, remember we talked about
Speaker 1: the article where Elwood Barock was visiting Jeffrey Epstein at
Speaker 1: his townhouse and there were all kinds of girls going
Speaker 1: in and out. Brock says, of course, Oh, we're just
Speaker 1: there for a business meeting. I hardly even know the guy. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: how is it that you're locked in all these other
Speaker 1: business dealings with them? How is it that you're locked
Speaker 1: into any sort of financial arrangement with somebody you don't
Speaker 1: even know. Give me a break. Barrock formed a limited
Speaker 1: partnership company in Israel in twenty fifteen called some EB
Speaker 1: to invest in a high tech startup then called Reporty,
Speaker 1: now named Carbine, which developed video streaming and geolocation software
Speaker 1: for emergency services. A large part of the money used
Speaker 1: by some to buy Reporty stock was supplied by Epstein.
Speaker 1: Haretz reported on Thursday. So you have this company, Carben,
Speaker 1: and the funds that it was given to basically get
Speaker 1: off the ground that were provided in a seed format
Speaker 1: by Jeffrey Epstein. So he was giving them ill gotten
Speaker 1: gains to start this company. See why they don't want
Speaker 1: to rico case here, folks? You see how far it
Speaker 1: would reach. Can you imagine the nightmare for the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice to have to put all their friends on trial,
Speaker 1: to have to put all of their allies on trial,
Speaker 1: because that's what all of these people are. Let's not
Speaker 1: cut corners. What you don't think Ehud Barack is running
Speaker 1: around with insert politician here. Of course he is, but
Speaker 1: yet he has never answered any of these questions about
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. The report appears to raise new questions about
Speaker 1: the connection between Barack and the disgraced Epstein, a relationship
Speaker 1: that has become a favorite election talking point for Prime
Speaker 1: Minister Benjamin Netan Yahoo after Barack re entered the political
Speaker 1: fray last month announcing a new party formed for the
Speaker 1: purpose of inceeding net Yahoo see net Yahoo, He tried
Speaker 1: to use this situation as a cudgel to smash over
Speaker 1: Barock's head. And while I understand why you would want
Speaker 1: to do that, it's not a good look. If you've
Speaker 1: never talked about this before, You've never talked about Epstein
Speaker 1: or Barack, and then you bring it up because of
Speaker 1: an election. That makes you look bad too. Where were
Speaker 1: you at for all of these years before it was
Speaker 1: serving your purposes? Oh that's right, you were silent with
Speaker 1: the rest of them, So go sit down, take a seat,
Speaker 1: and shut up. You don't care. Net and Yahoo just
Speaker 1: like the rest of them, don't care. Responding to the report,
Speaker 1: New Yahoo took the social media with the demand investigate
Speaker 1: Ehud Barack immediately. Well, I don't disagree with that. Old
Speaker 1: boys should have definitely been investigated. Look, let me be
Speaker 1: very clear, anyone who received any money from Epstein in
Speaker 1: any way should be looked at under the predicates of RICO.
Speaker 1: The Prime Minister did not say what behavior on Barrock's
Speaker 1: part could be the subject of a criminal probe, as
Speaker 1: no actions described in the report appeared to illegal. Well,
Speaker 1: how about receiving ill gotten gains from a criminal enterprise?
Speaker 1: How about the fact that Virginia has some pretty bad
Speaker 1: things to say about Ehud Barak? Are we just going
Speaker 1: to forget about that? Or are we not going to
Speaker 1: report it?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: I know what we're doing. We're not going to report it.
Speaker 1: And remember, folks, lies of omission are still lies. Barack
Speaker 1: too responded to the report and netan Yahoo's post, confirming
Speaker 1: the twenty fifteen partnership with Epstein and comparing the convicted
Speaker 1: sex of to net and Yahoo. You don't have to investigate,
Speaker 1: I confess, he said in a statement. I gave a
Speaker 1: second chance both to Epstein and to Bibi net Yahoo.
Speaker 1: Both are now neck deep in criminality. I expect both
Speaker 1: to recuse themselves until the truth is ascertained. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that's exactly it. Huh, you gave him a second chance.
Speaker 1: Does anyone believe that out there, anyone listening to this
Speaker 1: believe that that Hud Barack is just such a forgiving
Speaker 1: man that he decided that Epstein, of all people, was
Speaker 1: worth a second chance. Give me a break already, he added,
Speaker 1: for my part, all my activities were those of a
Speaker 1: private citizen, not a minister or a prime minister. All
Speaker 1: were legal, reported to the authorities, and taxes were paid
Speaker 1: on them. Well, how about your cavorting with Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 1: How about what Virginia has to say about you? And
Speaker 1: this is just what we know in the public sphere.
Speaker 1: Who the hell knows what kind of information are fantastic
Speaker 1: gainst yan wa and the DOJ is compiled because we're
Speaker 1: never gonna see any of that. Addressing Net and Yahoo,
Speaker 1: he added, how about you. Thursday's exchange of blows between
Speaker 1: the two former political allies came amid an ongoing spat
Speaker 1: over Barack's past relationship with Epstein, and did should look,
Speaker 1: this is going to be something that's certainly brought up
Speaker 1: in a political race. If you have ties to Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein from here on out, you're gonna get painted with them.
Speaker 1: But Barack was able to swiggle off the hook once again, right,
Speaker 1: no real questions, no look into his past, no look
Speaker 1: into how that money arrived or where that money originated.
Speaker 1: It was all just okay, well he got the money,
Speaker 1: no big deal. On Sunday, the Prime Minister tweeted a
Speaker 1: screenshot of a Hebrew language report about Epstein's most recent
Speaker 1: arrest and his ties to Barack some fifteen years ago.
Speaker 1: The report said that Epstein had been a trustee of
Speaker 1: the Wexner Foundation when it gave Barack one million dollars
Speaker 1: for unspecify consulting services in two thousand and four. Now,
Speaker 1: why would Wexner and their charity, their group needs somebody
Speaker 1: like Ehud Barock to come and talk to them, unless,
Speaker 1: of course, they're just trying to give their boy a bag.
Speaker 1: And honestly, that seems like the most likeliest of scenarios,
Speaker 1: trying to hook their boy up and you know, oh,
Speaker 1: it's a donation, it's for this, it's for that. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: what they're getting is political favors in return. Barock responded
Speaker 1: with a sarcastic tweet. It pains me to hear that
Speaker 1: people I know get in trouble and face criminal charges.
Speaker 1: First Net and Yahoo, now Epstein. I wish both of them.
Speaker 1: I wish both of them that the truth will come out.
Speaker 1: You see how cavalier he plays with this, how brazen
Speaker 1: he was, and how he feels like he's above the fray. Well,
Speaker 1: I have news for Ehud Barock. You are not above
Speaker 1: the fray, certainly not in America. And you need to
Speaker 1: answer some questions, homie, about this company, about how you
Speaker 1: got this seed money and if any of it came
Speaker 1: from ill gotten gains. Epstein was arrested Saturday in connection
Speaker 1: with allegations that he was involved in sex trafficking dozens
Speaker 1: of miners in New York and Florida between two thousand
Speaker 1: and two and two thousand and five. He was indicted
Speaker 1: Monday in federal court in Manhattan. Net Yahoo is at
Speaker 1: the center of three criminal investigations into alleged corruption. Net
Speaker 1: Yahoo doubled down on Tuesday, posting a video under the
Speaker 1: heading what else has sex offender Epstein given the Barock?
Speaker 1: That's a good question. I wonder what else he did?
Speaker 1: Give to him. We know that they weren't just passing
Speaker 1: in the night. You know, when Epstein's seating your company,
Speaker 1: there's usually a lot more that goes with it. The
Speaker 1: video charges that Barrock received a payment of two point
Speaker 1: three million dollars from the Wexner Foundation and has not
Speaker 1: disclosed what the payment was for, beyond saying in an
Speaker 1: interview that he provides consulting and research services. It claimed
Speaker 1: Barack never conducted the research. Net Nyaho is the COUD
Speaker 1: party also has alleged that Barack attended a party hosted
Speaker 1: by Epstein in twenty and sixteen. Yeah, that's definitely the case.
Speaker 1: And for Barack's part, he plays the politician well. He
Speaker 1: always defers or uses what aboutisms when he's drawn into this.
Speaker 1: So that is a tried and true method for people
Speaker 1: who are politically savvy. Barack struck back late Tuesday noting
Speaker 1: Netanyahu's close friendship with Arnaud Memron, a Frenchman sentenced to
Speaker 1: eight years in prison for tax evasion that reached into
Speaker 1: the billions of euros. I got news for you. Someone
Speaker 1: who's in jail for tax evasion is not someone who
Speaker 1: is on the same pedestal as Jeffrey Epstein. Nice try, Barack,
Speaker 1: but you're gonna have to do better. Asked about the
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen partnership, Barack initially declined to confirm the report
Speaker 1: to Heretz, saying he would not disclose the identities of
Speaker 1: private investors who worked with them. I saw a business
Speaker 1: opportunity and registered a partnership under my control in Israel,
Speaker 1: Barock told Horetz. A small number of people I know
Speaker 1: are invested in it in a commercial deal that benefited everyone.
Speaker 1: Since these were private investments, it would be inappropriate and
Speaker 1: wrong for me to reveal the identities of the investing parties.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, more transparency. What a joke. And this dude
Speaker 1: is a joke as well, the fact that he's been
Speaker 1: able to slide under the radar for so long. We're
Speaker 1: talking about an ex prime minister here, of folks, somebody
Speaker 1: who is has a lot of power, somebody who is
Speaker 1: at the table, you know, the table that you and
Speaker 1: I are never invited to. That's the table that this
Speaker 1: dude's sitting at. And for him to give these bs excuses,
Speaker 1: these bs nonsensical answers, it's just not acceptable. So once again,
Speaker 1: another person who was up to their ears. In Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein's Ill Gotten Gains, seems to just walk away with
Speaker 1: a bunch of money and doesn't have to answer any questions. Well,
Speaker 1: unfortunately for all of them, those questions are going to
Speaker 1: continue to be asked, and if they keep giving me answers,
Speaker 1: well we'll just keep asking the questions because it's obvious
Speaker 1: to anyone who's paying attention here that there are a
Speaker 1: whole heap of people who at the very least received
Speaker 1: money from Jeffrey Epstein and do benefited from ill Gotten Gains.
Speaker 1: If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
Speaker 1: at Bobby Kopuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's b O
Speaker 1: B B y C A p U c c I
Speaker 1: at proton mail dot com. You can also find me
Speaker 1: on Twitter at Bobby underscore c A p U c CI.
Speaker 1: The link that I discussed can be found in the
Speaker 1: description box.