Speaker 1: The following presentation is Del Marvis Studio's production.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the fact Hunter Radio Network.
Speaker 3: Here is your host, George Hobbs.
Speaker 4: Welcome back truth seekers from around the world. It's time
for another edition of the fact Hunter podcast. It's lunchtime
on this Monday, November the tenth, twenty twenty five. I
hope everybody had a great weekend. Recording on this Monday.
Very busy the next couple of days, and I wanted
to make sure something got out this week. We had
originally planned to talk about the Vatican and its ties
and how you know, Rome never really felt it kind
of just went underground, you know. I reviewed it last
night preparing to record today. There was some connections that
were missing and that I felt needed to be tied up.
So I'm going to put that on the back burner
for the time being. So today we're going to talk
about transhumanism, something we talked about a lot last year
on the radio, but I don't think we've addressed it
too much recently, and some things have popped up.
Speaker 1: In the news.
Speaker 4: I got a video about Amy Cruz and this push
for transhumanism and how we as humans need to keep
up with technology and the push for implants, there's a
lot to talk about. I also want to give you
a heads up for next week's episode. We're going to
really deep dive into the LDS and it's really amazing
when I took the time to do some research, all
kinds of nuggets, like they're over representation in the CIA.
There's a ton of those folks working for the government,
their love of government, and this religion that has evolved
over the last I got us one hundred and seventy
years or so. I don't have all my notes in
front of me, but it's very interesting and you're not
going to want to miss this episode.
Speaker 1: That'll be next week. I can't.
Speaker 4: I'm hoping to have it out next Tuesday. Again, we
have a very busy next couple of weeks, hoping this
flight situation gets taken care of because you know, my
daughter is getting married next Saturday, not this but the
next and we have a lot of people coming from
out of town, and you know, you see the news
and the flights have been a mess. But hey, you
can only you know, handle what you can control.
Speaker 1: So God is good.
Speaker 4: So today again we're going to talk about you know,
tech and transhumanism and the quote unquote elites agenda, right,
and we're going to be talking about DARPA, will certainly
be talking about the experiments that goes on in Silicon Valley.
There Again, when you are a Bill Gates, when you're
a Rockefeller, when you're a Rothschild, when you have all
the money in the world, it's not the fact that
they're constantly chasing money, which they are. These people never
have enough, but it's immortality there. Fight against God, they
want to outlive God. That's really what is behind this,
this you know, quest for upgrading humanity. Right, But there's
very dark theological ramifications, moral implications that we're going to
talk about, right, What does it mean to be made
in God's image when billionaires seek to rewrite creation itself?
And that's something we covered in depth and our other
podcast for the last two and a half three years.
And there's something I'm working on right now currently in
a class, right, Old creation versus Young creation, heliocentrism versus geocentrism.
And it seems like all of the pseudoscience has happened
over the last one hundred and twenty one hundred and
thirty years, and it's interesting because it is kind of
in parallel with the creation state of Israel. So this
is going to be interesting. We've been working on it
on the side, worked on it last night, and I
think we have a nice little connection to talk about
this this subject today and let's jump right into it.
So again, you know, from a biblical aspect, God created mankind.
He didn't leave anything out right, our mind, body, and
spirit all designed in divine balance. But somewhere along the
way over the last one hundred years, the creation the people,
and you could really tie this back to Babylon, right,
it's not that recent. This is something that kings and
pharaohs and you know those folks, they believe that they
could improve on the Creator.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: What started big in the sixties and seventies was all
the you know, light bo suction and you know, you
see like Laura Lomer, she looks like a cartoon character now, right,
But that's really the seed of every rebellion in history,
whether it's Eden to Babylon and to Silicon Valley, which
really took off in the seventies. But today we call
it transhumanism. It's not you know, a sixties sci fi
fantasy movie anymore.
Speaker 1: It is real.
Speaker 4: It is happening on multiple levels. It's important to note
that is it extremely well funded, extremely well funded. And
again it's built on this idea, Yeah, that humans can
upgrade themselves.
Speaker 1: You can get your chip.
Speaker 4: Implants and you'll have better memory, and this and that, right,
all the promise, but the endgame is immortality, super intelligence,
freedom from disease, and the ability to evolved, you know,
beyond just biology. And what they're saying is, you know,
ye shall be as God's right.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 4: If you want to fully understand transhumanism, you have to
look at the people behind it. It's this relentless human
belief that we can reach perfection on our own right.
Every empire, if you go back through history, every revolution,
every dare we say a great reset, It starts with
that same impulse we can and build heaven without God.
And the twentieth century truly kicked off this ideology with modernism.
They created Darwinism, Helio Centrism was pushed humanism, and that
is something that we've talked about a nauseum on this podcast.
The humanists that do they're atheists, they don't believe in
God life in lieu of God, and now they simply
branded as the next stage of evolution, right, the continuous
evolution of mankind. Gentleman by the name of Ray Kurzweel.
He is Google's director of Engineering and one of transhumanism's
loudest voices. I'm going to read verbatim what he said,
and you can find this on YouTube. We will transcend biology.
Humanity will become something greater than we can imagine. So
that's not engineering talk, that's religious talk. So his singularity
is a digital second coming where machines surpass their creators
and upload our consciousness to live forever in the cloud,
while constantly, you know, creating new bodies to download.
Speaker 1: Their consciousness.
Speaker 4: Right now, scientists call this progress. I think most of
us call that idolatry dressed in code. Now, I am
going to play at.
Speaker 1: The end of this podcast, pardon me.
Speaker 4: About a fifteen minute clip from Amy Cruse and Stanford
Tech and part of sator I think it's called Satori Capital,
and they're all about this digital age and neuralinks and.
Speaker 1: Things of that nature.
Speaker 4: So again, everything that we're talking about today isn't new.
It goes all the way back to Genesis Genesis three,
to be exact, if you remember the serpent's pitch to Eve, Right,
it wasn't a violent revolution, it was really subtle.
Speaker 1: Right. What did he say?
Speaker 4: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof,
then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall.
Speaker 1: Be as God's.
Speaker 4: That is the same pitch right at the heart of
every transhumanist manifesto. You're limited. God is holding you back.
But we man, we have the tools to unlock your
full potential.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: That's been Satan's trick for the last six thousand years.
So instead of the fruit of knowledge, today's forbidden fruit
comes in the form of neural implants, crisper technology, which
go back to flight three seventy at h three seventy.
Who was on that plane, crisper scientists? Where did they go?
Are they on some secret island now working for the elites?
Speaker 1: Probably? Right?
Speaker 4: Instead of the Tree of Knowledge, it's that five G
tower outside of your house.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: And the serpent doesn't whisper anymore, by the way, he
live streams from Silicon Valley press conferences. And again I'll
play that fifteen minute clip at the end. Now, let's
look a little bit at transhumanism, and remember none of
these things just kind of appear out of thin air.
They're well planned, and it's really the bastard child of
several older movements, right, the Enlightenment, which dethroned divine revelation
in favor of human reason, Darwinism, eugenics, and of course technocracy. Right,
they believe that scientists and engineers should rule society. What
happened in twenty twenty, scientists ruled society. So to say
that transhumanism is close, it's already here. Technocracy is already here,
for sure. And you combine those ingredients, you add the
processing power of modern computing, and that's where you get
today's elite obsession. And that is the perfection of man
through machine. Now during the twentieth century. Now we've talked
about Eldus Huxley on this podcast, but not sure we
really talk too often about Julian Huxley.
Speaker 1: And that's the.
Speaker 4: Brother of the brave New World author Aldis. He laid
the groundwork in nineteen fifty seven. Huxley coined the very
word transhumanism.
Speaker 1: He envisioned a.
Speaker 4: Future where man uses science to realize new possibilities of
and for his human nature. And you know, his influence
didn't merely end with textbooks. He was the first Director
General of UNESCO, that is the UN's cultural branch. From there,
his philosophy filtered into the very institutions shaping education, medicine,
and world policy today. That's the seed bed, if you will,
of what we're seeing now. These you know, ruling elites.
They convinced that they have the moral duty, not just
the desire, to improve humanity. That's how psychopaths think. That's
how they process things, right, even if it means rewriting
the entire blueprint. But now that they have a plan,
they have to sell right. Like Desert Storm, they had
to get the people behind it right, Niira right nine
to eleven.
Speaker 1: They wanted to get the patriot ac passed. Right.
Speaker 4: They have to c we ate some type of action
or in this case, marketing and listen, no one sells
the future like the tech elite do.
Speaker 1: Right. We're quick to wear a.
Speaker 4: Watch that monitors us might as well be wearing an
ankle bracelet.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: Our computers and our phones, the cameras are always on.
But how do they sell their upgrades? They say, we're
curing disease, right, like the JAB a few years ago.
We're helping paraplegics walk again. We're ending suffering. And on
the surface, who could argue with that, right, But behind
the human humanitarian humanitarian pardon me language, is a trillion
dollar race to control the next phase of human existence.
And that takes us to DARPA, right, And you know
DARPA from lifelog to.
Speaker 1: You know, sixty years ago.
Speaker 4: It's the Pentagon's research arm, very much laid apart in COVID,
and they have many programs like the Next Generation Nonsurgical
Neurotechnology Initiative. Okay, they're developing brain machine interfaces that can
transmit data from thought to computer without physical implants. This
is not medical aid, this is mind control.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: How many of these people that we've seen in the
news over the last how many years.
Speaker 1: Have been controlled had their brain taken over by DARPA.
Speaker 4: We see these things on the news and we say,
how could anybody do something like that?
Speaker 1: Well, what if DARPA was controlling their brain?
Speaker 4: And look at you know many people's hero now elon
Musk's neuralink. Their official goal is to connect humans and
computers for enhanced cognitive ability. And like we said, on
the surface, it's heroic, but if you go back and
listen to Musk talking. He is very open about merging
the brain with AI. So once again humans aren't left behind.
The rhetoric they use is progress, but the reality is
control and surveillance based data harvesting systems right where even
your own thoughts. If you thought being anonymous today was difficult, man,
if they can access your thoughts.
Speaker 1: You were doomed.
Speaker 4: You know, when I did that episode on Ted Kazinski,
it was one of the most downloaded episodes I ever did,
and it got pulled from Spotify.
Speaker 1: I think it was Spotify, one of the big ones.
Speaker 4: And again we're very clear about not condoning what he did,
but his writings were right on the button. His manifesto
was on the button. He understood that if they didn't
get a hold of the control of technology, it was
going to lead to our enslavement for lack of better words,
and that's what happened.
Speaker 1: We're really on the cusp of that.
Speaker 4: Right, just like the World Economic Forum says, right, you'll
own nothing and be happy. But understand, this transhumanist movement
isn't just a science movement. It's a religious movement without repentance.
It promises salvation through technology, eternal life through consciousness, uploading
omniscience through AI. Their priests or technocrats. The sacraments are
implants and upgrade, and the promised land is simply a
digital cloud. And its creed is there is no God
but progress, and Silicon is his prophet. Now, this religion
has its own eschatology. Right this moment when AI becomes
self aware and merges with humanity, Kurzwill predicted it would
happen around twenty forty five. But underneath this utopian talk
lies an unmistakable elitism. There aren't technologies for the common man. Right,
The first to receive immortality upgrades will be the billionaire class. Right,
we understand that, And listen, it's not a coincidence that
these people live to be one hundred and two, one
hundred and five.
Speaker 1: Right. They have the occasional family member who might die
in their sixties.
Speaker 4: But lord knows how many kidney transplants, liver transplants, heart
transplants that these.
Speaker 1: People go through.
Speaker 4: Right, As we mentioned back in the Getty episode, and
these people already control the economies, governments, and information. They
talk about equality, but what they're doing is they're building
a digital empire for themselves. So remember go back to
the Bible. It says that man was created in God's image.
It's powerful, but it's threatening to the you know, the
billionaire class's movement, because if we're already created in His likeness,
there's nothing left for them to sell us. Transhumanism depends
on making you believe you're incomplete, or you're flawed, or
you're upgradeable. Right, if you look at Psalm one thirty
nine fourteen, it says, I will praise THEE for and
fearfully and wonderfully made marvelous are thy works. This isn't
some philosophical conflict. This is spiritual warfare in the language
of technology. The elites want to redefine humanity because whoever
defines it means that they control everything, right, whether it's law, reproduction,
on and on. So in their view, humanity is a
product line, not a creation, and they want to edit
human DNA the same they edit you know, the same
way they edit software. But the second that human beings
become programmable, they cease to be free. Now, via propaganda
and the television and the Internet are to a certain
extent programmable. They know how to create actions in the
world to get us to react in a certain way. Right,
they say, this is our endgame. What conflicting action do
we have to create to get people to feel a
certain way and to support a certain ideology. Now we
still have the free will to do so. Right, those
who are awake, like you and I are going to
be more resistant to that movement, to that action. That's
why it's so important, you know, hey, to get people saved,
bring people to Jesus and be to wake them up.
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 4: What three movies are the matrix.
Speaker 1: They live?
Speaker 4: And of course I can't think of the Jim Carrey
movie now, you know, the one where he's in The
Truman Show, Thank You, The True Man Show. That's basically
the world we live in.
Speaker 1: Those three together.
Speaker 4: And not necessarily alien shape shifters, but the fact with
the glasses, the ability to see. Right, once the movie starts,
there's the blind preacher speaking. He gets arrested, But what
was the point of that? Right, even the blind could
see more than the people who had vision. He understood
how things were working. And then when you finally got
the glasses, you could see really how the world was operating.
And that's very powerful, even though when you say it.
Many people say, oh, that b movie by John Carpenter.
When you actually take it and break it down, it's
a pretty powerful movement. So I'm going to set the
stage here. Remember that the elites believe evolution didn't end
with Darwin. It continues through data. They believe salvation comes
not through Christ but through code. And they believe that
those who resist the upgrade are dangerous relics. That's the
people who do not take the upgrade, right, which, look,
I'm not a prophet. I don't know if the end
game is going to come in my lifetime or not.
Twenty thirty seems to be screaming right, but we'll see.
Just like people who refuse to buy new cars because
they can't be controlled, they can't be turned off.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: But this conversation we're having today is important to talk about, right,
very important to talk about. Let's talk about you know,
the financiers and the people behind it, and you know,
the marketing of human enhancement, many of it, believe it
or not, as military contractors, and of course global think tanks,
the World Economic Forum and the Council on Foreign Relation
that they're behind these things. The big tech billionaires of
course Bill and Melinda Foundation, Old Money Foundations, Carnegie, Rockefeller. Right,
they're all moving toward the same vision, and that is
a redesigned human race. It's not a sci fi conspiracy.
This is verifiable, you know, combination of government, academia, and industry.
It's the new Tower of Babel. And instead of bricks,
they're using circuit boards.
Speaker 1: So let's start with DARPA.
Speaker 4: Right, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency was founded in
nineteen fifty eight, and they're all about merging man and
machine for military supremacy. Right now, we said that was
going to be the next great leap on the battlefield,
not so much tanks and helicopters and drones, but combinations
of you know, man and machine. Now, DARPA launched bto
the Biological Technologies Office about ten years ago and they
openly openly you can go look for yourself. They fund
projects to enhance human performance. So projects like N three,
which is the next generation non surgical neurotechnology and the
keyword being non surgical and if you truly think about
non surgical and the ability for someone to I mean,
this is very conspiratorial, but I'm having a massadage hit
slip in and cut your hair and drop this on you.
If it's nonsurgical, we're really.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's interesting to think about it.
Speaker 4: I'm not sure interesting is the right word, but you
get where I'm coming from. Being able to create this
brain computer interfaces capable of transmitting signals directly from the
human cortext without surgery, I mean, that's scary.
Speaker 1: You can be hijacked.
Speaker 4: And again their goal is, oh no, it's just communication
between soldiers and autonomous systems at the speed of thought.
And obviously you know you're not next to each other,
you're on the other side of the building.
Speaker 1: You can communicate.
Speaker 4: It's always a positive sounding thing. But those of us
who listen to these type of podcasts were peeling back
the layers of the onion and thinking, well, what else
can they do with this?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 4: You look at the other ventures DARPA has going on.
Elect RX designed to modulate the body's immune and nervous
systems electronically. How about subnets, a neuromodulation project for psychological
resilience to blur the line between therapy and control. So
when a government program can adjust your emotions and electrodes
and declare it resilient. I mean you've crossed a huge
line between medicine and manipulation. Now, remember DARPA does not
publish everything, right, anything that is considered secret or top
secret does not make the website, So that the things
we just talked about that's public. Imagine what is not right.
Let's talk about Silicon Valley from Palo Alto.
Speaker 1: You have Google.
Speaker 4: In twenty thirteen, it launched Calico that stands for California
Life Company. You know the names, Arthur Levinson, Larry Page,
Serge Brynn. Their mission is to understand the biology that
controls lifespan and to devise interventions that enable people to
live longer in healthier lives. And again this is coming
from tech people, right. So behind that polished pr is
a billion dollar race for digital immortality, right, and I
think they use us as the guinea pigs.
Speaker 1: Right, That's another way to think of it.
Speaker 4: Google's subsidiary deep Mind has already moved beyond gameplaying to
study neural pattern prediction and consciousness modeling. So when Kurzwell
again that's Google's director of engineering, says that he expects
to resurrect his late father through digital means, Okay, I'm
gonna say that again. He expects to resurrect his late
father through digital means. Okay, he is not being metaphorical.
He is literally describing synthetic resurrection. Right when the Tower
of Babel got too high, God intervened. I think man
is dangerously close to crossing lines that they were never
meant to. And again, I'm not a prophet. I'm not
saying God's you know, Jesus is returning tomorrow night. Bible
does say he is going to return like a thief
in the night. It's gonna happen in the in the
sixth of a nanosecond. Right, this is evil stuff, right.
Elon Musk plays the role of a high tech profit.
His company in Nearlink aims to merge the human brain
with AI. Right, what's his famous quote, We must merge
with AI or will become obsolete.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: Then you have the think tanks at the University of Oxford.
Speaker 1: We covered that.
Speaker 4: Institution and death in a podcast.
Speaker 1: You had.
Speaker 4: Philosopher Nick Bostrom founded the Future of Humanity Institute, And
this is a think tank exploring what he calls existential
risks and long term human enhancement. So Bostrom is one
of the leading modern transhumanists, and he envisions uploading consciousness
to digital substrates and using AI to maximize well being
through algorithms. Now he's funded by the Oxford Martin School
consulted by the World Economic Forum. He wrote a very
famous paper back in two thousand and three entitled are
You Living in a Computer Simulation? And it became a
cornerstone for these quote unquote tech elites who already view
reality as programmable. Right here in the United States, this
Singularity University. It is co founded by Kurzweil and Peter
diamandis with not only Google funding but NASA funding hmm.
It trains executives and entrepreneurs to build exponential technologies. And
their motto is we can solve any problem with technology.
And that's the furthest thing from the truth. Right This
is a theological statement masquerading as innovation, because once you
believe technology can fix every thing, you no longer need
a savior. You just need faster and bigger servers and
of course the great reset. Right old kloal Schwab found
the World Economic Forum in nineteen seventy one, and again,
his public persona is that of you know it was
before twenty twenty we should say, you know, this harmless economist.
But twenty twenty changed the game, right. We found out
that the WF was a meeting point for governments, corporations,
and more importantly in Goos. They went there to align
you know, world policy from economic models to digital identity systems.
And of course his book The Fourth Industrial Revolution, he
wrote the physical, digital, and biological worlds are converging. And
what he said here is that convergence is the blending
of flesh and code. It is trans humanism. And of
course you know who were.
Speaker 1: The young global leaders.
Speaker 4: You have Trudeau from Canada, Macron from France, Zuckerberg of
meta Facebook, whatever you want to call it, tons and
tons of political elites, including was it the young lady
who led New Zealand through COVID, that psychopath?
Speaker 1: I think she was one of them.
Speaker 4: And they will continue to push data driven governance. They
will continue to push biometric ideas and centralized surveillance. And
you know they're able to tap into our phone. That's
you know, they sell and we slow down. I always say,
we pay for our own demise, right, whether it's a
Netflix subscription or whatever, but we pay for these surveillance
systems for our home nest or what Google, whatever theirs is.
I think Amazon has one and they are able to
tap into it. So they literally have cameras.
Speaker 1: All over the world.
Speaker 4: If you think for one moment that these elite agencies
aren't able to tap into our home security systems, I
got a bridge to sell you. And again, what is
their end goal with all this surveillance and technology. They
want a population that is one hundred percent managed, whether
it's health, finance. They want to track your thoughts, right,
minority report level stuff, right before you rebel against these people,
they're going to get the message. Yeah, this guy had
a thought of you know, showing up to the capitol,
right and you get locked up, and you know this
is really eugenics rebranded. Eugenics got a big push in
the twenties and thirties the Rockefeller Foundation, right, they funded
the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and eugenics.
And again, just like the Vatican, Rome didn't fall, it
just went underground. The same with eugenics, right, it just rebranded.
The new label became genetics, population control, transhumanism. And again
I can't implore enough how important population.
Speaker 1: Control is to these maniacs.
Speaker 4: The very first rule on the Georgia Guidestones five hundred
million in perpetual balance with nature. And again they don't
see themselves as being evil.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: They keep us in perpetual war for the betterment of
the world.
Speaker 1: That's how they think, right.
Speaker 4: This same ideology human improvement through selective manipulation. Right, and
we talked about the hux LEAs and the connections there.
But what unites DARPA, Google, the World Economic Forum, you
know these think tanks isn't simple technology. It is the
belief that man can perfect himself without God. It's the
same rebellion in different uniforms.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: The military seeks control over the body, scientists seek control
over the biology. The economists they want to see control
over the population, and then the philosopher wants to see
control over the meaning of itself. It's really they're forming
a new sanhedron, is what it is.
Speaker 1: Right. They are deciding.
Speaker 4: Which truths are allowed, which voices are silence. That's been
going on for five or six years now, Right, guys,
they speak in scientific language, but understand they are operating
on a spiritual premise. They believe that evolution can be guided,
that consciousness can be replicated, and that morality is a
simple design flaw.
Speaker 1: That they can create a patch for.
Speaker 4: But again, if you read your Bible, scripture tells a
different story. Look at Proverbs fourteen twelve. There is a
way which seemeth right unto a man, But the end
thereof are the ways of death. Okay, And we already
talked about all the money trail right, whether it's the
Gates Foundation, DARPA grants, NIH grants, black Rock of Vanguard.
Look and listen this new fifty year mortgage they're talking about.
This is a way of them owning everything without owning
everything directly. You're just paying rent for fifty years. The
banks own it. Vanguard and Blackrock owned the banks. That's
their way to scheme. They still own these properties. And
even once you pay them off in fifty years, when
you're ninety four, you're still paying you know, three four
thousand dollars a year for property taxes.
Speaker 1: And that's that we need to break this.
Speaker 4: Serfdom group think that too many people in our country
and our world experienced today.
Speaker 1: So we're going to move on.
Speaker 4: I'm very limited on time today, let's talk about the
tools of this transformation.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 4: In twenty twelve, you had two scientists, Jennifer Dudna and
Emmanuel Charpentier. They discovered crisper cast nine.
Speaker 1: That was a gene.
Speaker 4: Editing tool that like molecular scissors. Now with it, according
to science, researchers can cut and replace DNA sequences with
incredible precision. And again on paper, it sounds miraculous. Who
would be a hater in that situation, right, Curing hereditary diseases,
eradicating cancer, eliminating genetic defense.
Speaker 1: By the way, what happened with that.
Speaker 4: Vaccine Russia came out with earlier this year to write
the cancer vaccine. Listen, every miracle has a hidden cost.
This ozembic push, it's harmed a lot of people, and
in five years we're going to be talking about it,
just like we talk about the jab, just like we
talk about talcum powder. There's no short cuts in life.
There is no shortcuts in life. Right, there's a great
proponent to science.
Speaker 1: I've seen men.
Speaker 4: Yet seriously hurt on the battlefield to the point like
there's no way he's going to make it to where
a year later he's walking like nothing ever happened, you know, sands,
the scars, et cetera. But I mean crisper isn't used
just to heal. They use it as an altar. Just
seven years ago, there was a Chinese scientist I think
his name was Jianki or something like that. He announced
that he had edited the embryos of twin girls to
make them resistant to HIV, the first genetically modified humans
in history. Genetically modified. Now, of course he was denounced publicly,
but the genie was out of the bottle. And that's
been seven years since then, laboratories across the world have
quietly continued germline experiments, okay, edits that are heritable, meaning
that changes pass to every future generation. They are rewriting
God's code. And when man starts art's rewriting DNA. He's
not just you know, treating disease. He is editing creation.
And that question that no one wants to ask is
who decides what counts as improvement? You know, someone wrote
a paper and I tried to find it this morning.
I couldn't that he was told in a scientific circle
that they were able to edit a gene that would
end life at the age of like fifty seven or
something like that. They could program it to when you
hit fifty seven, your body shut down. Because what is
you know, according to them, what is the greatest anchor
on society, it's the elderly people, right, the social security payments. Right,
they're sitting on houses that are paid off, so the
banks are getting interest what they call useless eaters, right,
that is what they call them. And these same scientific
circles that once endorsed eugenics, well now they have the
ability to re engineer humanity at a genetic level.
Speaker 1: This gene drive technology.
Speaker 4: Right, Rockefeller Gates, they all fund these programs. And again
it's under the banner of public health. Right, all the
abortion in the world is considered public health. You know
that video of what is her name? If I can
find it, I'm going to stop and play it real
quick in my bookmarks.
Speaker 1: What is her name? Stevie Nicks?
Speaker 4: She was in the group Fleetwood MAC. The Center for
Reproductive Rights tweeted this on November seventh. They said this
is a must watch. Stevie Nick speaks openly about the
abortion that allowed her to continue her career at the
height of Fleetwood Max rise because if she would have
had the baby.
Speaker 1: I mean, the band would have just gone away.
Speaker 4: That that's there, that's what they're telling you.
Speaker 1: I want you to listen to what she says.
Speaker 5: I got pregnant, and it was like, why, I have
an IUD, I am totally protected. I have a great guynecologist.
How come this has happened?
Speaker 3: So you took all the precautions?
Speaker 5: Yes, And I'm like, this can't be happening. Fleetwood Mac
is three years in and it's big and we're going
into our third album. It was like, oh no, no, no, no,
no no. It would have destroyed Fleetwood Mac if you
had a baby, absolutely because many reasons. I would have
like drived my best to get through, you know, being
the studio every single day, expecting a child, but mostly
having a child with Don Henley would not have gone
over big in Fleetwood Mac with and me. Had we'd
been broken up for two or three years, it would
have been a nightmare scenario for me to live through.
It takes some courage to step into the waters of
the abortion debate, Yes, it does.
Speaker 3: Why take the risk?
Speaker 5: Because everybody kept saying, well, somebody has to do something,
somebody has to say something, And I'm like, well, I
have a platform. I tell a good story, so maybe
I should try to do something.
Speaker 4: Of course, she's wearing all the New Age jewelry, and
a lot of people in the comment said, so, what
you're saying is you committed ritualistic child sacrifice and Satan
rewarded you with worldly fame and riches, and a lot
of people do believe that. And you know, she's justifying
her career over the life of a child, which is
another one of the reasons I walked away from much
of the mainstream music that I used to listen to.
Fleetwood mac Right one of the greatest albums ever made
from a musical aspect, but when you start to hear
the people behind it and their ideology, you know it's
not worth it the exchange for you know, tickling your
ears as they say, for people who look at murdering
a child as a means to you know, well, it
was gonna stop progression of my professional career, because you know,
no other musician has ever had a child, right, they
just have to retire because I have a child's It's ridiculous,
and that they play it. You know, if you understand
the burne, you know, mindscrew there they're trying to tell
young women who watch this video that it's bold, right,
it was a bold and brave move while it was
you know, this is propaganda and it's pure evil what
she did.
Speaker 1: So there you go.
Speaker 4: In twenty ten, the J. Craig Ven Institute announced the
creation of the first cell controlled entirely by synthetic genome.
He boasted that this is the first self replicating species
we've had on Earth. And whose parent is a computer?
Speaker 1: Did you catch that?
Speaker 4: Whose parent is a computer? So this technology is allowing
not just corporations but defense agencies to design organisms with
built in genetic switches. Bacteria that produces fuel, viruses that
carry DNA payloads, crops that self terminate after one harvest.
It is the dream of every technocrat. Programmable life. The
DoD has already functioned biofabrication. By the way, we never
buy those seeds. We only buy the seeds that are
you know, able to Why can't I think of the
term for those seeds now?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 4: But there are some seeds that they're only good for
one year, and you have to buy seeds again. Who
owns the largest seed vault in the world, Bill Gates?
Speaker 1: If you if you did know that, look it up.
Speaker 4: It's like in Norway, somewhere in the middle of nowhere,
this giant vault. So if they're able to have some
kind of famine or some kind of event that wipes
out all of our crops, I'm willing to bet that
all the seeds that he has left.
Speaker 1: You know, are the ones that they can control.
Speaker 4: It's it's really crazy to think that where they have
gone with these you know, everything.
Speaker 1: Is been modified. You're right, GMO, how many food products
do you eat?
Speaker 4: It's got the bio engineered stuff going grow. Grocery shopping
is like going to the range, but you're the target.
You're just trying to find food that is all natural.
Used to love those Jiffy muffins. They've gone full bioengineered.
Now we make our own corn bread right, more time consuming,
but you know what's going in your body, and in
twenty twenty five, whether it's a beverage, whether it's food
or what you're breathing, you've got to be more cognizant
than ever than what your body isn't. Taking Back to
the DoD, they've already funded biofabrication, the growing these synthetic
tissues for robots and soldiers. Meanwhile, you've got big Pharma
experimenting with mRNA. Right, that became a common term five
years ago, turning the body itself into a manufacturing plant
for drugs and vaccines. And listen, if your body has
a reaction to that vaccine, it's okay, We've got something
for that as well, to treat it is a business. Right,
that creates another problem, and they have a solution that
creates a problem that creates a solution. Perhaps the most
visible step towards transhumanism is the brain computer interface. That's
the big one, the BCI. That is literally a connection
between the nervous system and digital hardware, neuralink, founded by again,
I believe the character Elon Musk. I don't think, and
I'm talking going all the way back to Benjamin Franklin.
I think these people hijack ideas or have been what
do I want to say, kind of just prepped to
become a character, right like I think Jeff Bezos was
prepped to be. You're going to be the character that
plays the guy who started this little online store in
your garage and a few years later, here though, wealthiest
man in the world. You even have your own spaceships, right,
your rockets, whatever, It's all silly to me.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: Nerlink has already implanted its first human subject with a
chip capable of reading and transmitting brain activity. The company
promises to help paralyze individuals. Right, And again, on the surface,
that sounds fantastic, but again he is saying that his
ultimate goal is symbiosis with artificial intelligence. Then you got
companies like synchron Blackrock, Nerotech, and ironically they share the
same name as the financial giant Blackrock.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: Their goal is to create commercial BCIs And by the way,
that DARPA n THII program we talked about earlier, that
the same thing they want to achieve without surgery.
Speaker 1: And this is fact, it's not fiction.
Speaker 4: Just two years ago, in twenty twenty three, researchers demonstrated
the remote control use of a drone using a non
invasive headset that read brain waves so the pilot would
think up left fire and it happened in real time.
You think about, and this is two years ago, thoughts
becoming commands, commands becoming code, and of course AI is
going to play a huge.
Speaker 1: Part of it.
Speaker 4: Have you ever heard of the term Internet of bodies.
Iob it's a network where the human body itself becomes
a data node. The Rand Corporation another You see how
many times when you get down rabbit holes they connect to,
it's always the same ones. The Rand Corporation defines itself
as the collection of human bodies and data via devices
that are ingested and planted or worn. In other words,
wearable sensors. That sounds familiar your Apple watch, digital tattoos,
biometric implants, and they even have nanotech pills that you
can swallow and transmit your vital signs in real time.
Insurance companies, governments, and employers already experiment with mandatory biometrics
for safety and efficiency. Well, the World Economic Forum they
celebrate this trend, but they call it the next step
in human connectivity. But it's not about connectivity, it's about control.
Once your body is online, you can be monitored, you
can be quantified.
Speaker 1: You can be adjusted.
Speaker 4: You know, these social credit systems that are already in
place in China link biometric data to financial privileges. Right,
and I've said it before, There's going to come a
time when you go to Dollar General to get that
loaf of bread and eggs and it says card has
declined V nine and you look up what the code
V nine is. It's inappropriate tweet. You look at that
tweet you said about them aside, You delete your tweet
and then your card comes back online or whatever it is.
It sounds very dystopian, but I think that's.
Speaker 1: Going to be the endgame. I truly do.
Speaker 4: I think most of you saw that video that came
out of Texas last week. Gentlemen posted something anti Israel
on Facebook.
Speaker 1: The police showed up to his house. He said, what
are you doing. You either have free speech or you
do not.
Speaker 4: There is no on the fence. Just like when you die,
there are two places waiting you can go. There's no
on the fence. It's the same with free speech. It's
one or the other. And again, all these things are
going to be these control devices are going to be
disguised as convenience. And again, all these technologies, whether it's
gene editing, artificial intelligence, brain interfaces, synthetic biology. They will
promise makes you liberation, but they're going to deliver you bondage.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: They offer healing, but they redefine humanity. They will offer
you may very much is a possibility that in this
lifetime you will be offered immortality, but you have to
understand it will erase your soul.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: The transhumanist desires eternal life without repentance. That's why the
movement obsesses over consciousness, memory, and identity. Okay, they want
the resurrection of Christ's gospel without the cross. Okay, you
cannot code redemption, you cannot upload salvation. Eternal life is
not a data stream. It's a gift purchased by blood,
not by bandwidth or servers. When to recreate himself in silicon,
he becomes a shadow of the image. He rejects the
ultimate tragedy. Right, These brilliant minds that are trying to
defeat death. To be honest with you, they're the ones
running fastest toward it.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: Matthew sixteen twenty five says, for whosoever will save his
life shall lose it.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: So again, the line of every origin is false religion
and utopian promises. And these are some of the oldest
heresies on earth. Whether it's the Tower of Babel in
Genesis eleven, Right, that was mankind's first organized rebellion, if
you will, right, they didn't build it for worship. They
build it for self exaltation. And these elites behind transhumanism
are building Babel two point zero and again. And it's
not made out of bricks and mortar. It's made out
of circuits and DNA. And you know, transhumanism is truly
a religion, a man made religion, and it's God is technology.
You know, we've talked about this, and it's what's coming
is going to be a gradual conditioning. And I said
that there were a lot of people in twenty twenty
who said that the jab was the mark of the beast. Okay,
I didn't get it, and I can still buy and sell.
They made it difficult, and I said for the last
five years that that was conditioning, and that's what I believe.
And what happens is every generation grows more dependent on
the machine and they become more desensitive.
Speaker 1: To spiritual truth. Right.
Speaker 4: People talk to AI like their buddies. They confess to it,
they lean on it. And if you read the Book
of Revelation, it speaks of an image that speaks and
causes all to worship it. And for centuries that sounded impossible.
But look how quickly from you know, we first started
seeing arcade games in the little mom and pop stores,
at the sub shops, at the you know, the little
pizza huts. To now we hold a little, you know,
three inch by five inch device that we can talk
to someone on the other side of the world and
we can ask it any question and it'll give us
an answer. It's not always the right one, but it's
kind of when you sit down and think about where
technology is today, it is impressive, but it's also worrisome.
Anything can be used for good or bad. That if
you ever take anything away from my podcast, that's one
of the most important things. People will say technology is bad.
I can give you several instances how good it is.
Speaker 1: Right. Cars are great.
Speaker 4: You can drive them to get us around much more
efficient than they did in eighteen hundreds. But there's detriments
as well. Right, you can use them for harm people.
I know people lost their children in accidents. This is
the same thing, these same elite networks pushing transhumanism. They
are preparing the world for a final counterfeit kingdom. Trust me,
you'll know when Jesus comes back, there will be no
mistaking about it. So I got to wrap this up.
I had to keep it to an hour there's something
I'm not going to play that. Well, I guess I
can download it and play it. But again, from Babel
to Rome, understand that they promise the same thing.
Speaker 1: Okay, it's really.
Speaker 4: Important to remember that the elites talk about it grading
your bodies.
Speaker 1: Have faith over fear. Right.
Speaker 4: We saw that in twenty twenty one. Do you remember
Biden walking out and saying it was November of twenty
twenty one. He walked out and said, if you don't
get the vaccine, you're looking at a winner of death.
He looked every American in the eye and said, if
you don't get this vaccine, you're going to die. That
was one of the most dishonest, most evil things that
I've seen in my lifetime. And of course there's never
any accountability because they're part of the team. But remember,
Daniel reminds us that even when Babylon rises, God still rules.
He said, in the days of these kings, shall the
God of Heaven set up a kingdom which shall never
be destroyed. That's not future tense, that's a promise. There
is no globalist There is no AI, no World Economic Forum,
no digital beasts that can erase what's already.
Speaker 1: Been written right.
Speaker 4: Our call is simple, stand firm, stay pure, Speak the truth.
Speaker 1: It's very important, right.
Speaker 4: And the thing is, you can't fight deception with silence.
Speaker 1: You have to speak the truth. Right. You fight it.
Speaker 4: By exposing the works of darkness, not cowering from them.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: And that's why we try to live, you know, off grow.
We have as much dependence as a lot of you do.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 4: We have Wi Fi, we have the Internet, you know,
shame on me, but we do try to grow a
lot of our food.
Speaker 1: We deal with.
Speaker 4: Local butchers, We raise chickens, take them to the amish.
It's just everything in this world has become so nefarious, right,
we have to do a better job of knowing our neighbors,
breaking bread, getting out more. I haven't been out in
a few weeks to pass out by and.
Speaker 1: You know the.
Speaker 4: Boy, I'm struggling today. I've been so busy. We've got
a wedding in twelve days. My mind is the Bible tracks.
There we go, Thank you. But more importantly, it's important
to raise our children because sometimes we get caught up
in the truth. We need to take this knowledge, pass
it down to them because they're going to be fighting
it sooner than you think, so, I'll tell you that.
I know I've said this a million times, but I'm
going to end on this. It's a seed war. This
is a seed war, and I'm talking from Genesis to Revelation.
The story of humanity is about seeds, and you can
call it physical and spiritual. If you look at Genesis
three point fifteen, it says God declared war between the
seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent,
and that war continued use today, except now it's fought
in laboratories and boardrooms instead of on battlefields. And that
same spirit that sought to corrupt mankind before the flood, right,
because I think that's what really with the Nephelene Genesis six,
that's the same type of rebellion, rebellion, pardony that mingled
what God separated. Right, it's just back under the name
of genetic progress.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: They may call it biotechnology, but I think if you
look at scripture, it's war over creation itself. They're altering
the human seed through gene editing. They're altering the plant
seed through GMOs. They're corrupting the.
Speaker 1: Seed of truth through deceit.
Speaker 4: And God called very good, right, what God called very
good they now call obsolete right from genetically modified crops
that sterilized reproduction, to patented seeds that require corporate permission
to plant, to MR and RA technologies that rewrite cellular instructions.
The war overseed is a war on sovereignty. If man
can own the seed, he can own the future. But
God never surrendered that right. Genesis eight twenty two says,
as long as the earth remains seed, time and harvest
shall not cease. They can tinker with DNA, they can
try to redesign crops, but they can't recreate life, only distorted.
The true seed that cannot be corrupted is Christ himself,
which liveth and abideth for Rather, as what's said in
One Peter one twenty three, that seed will outlast every
genetic patent and digital genome that they invent.
Speaker 1: So that's a wrap. I'm going to play.
Speaker 4: Just the first few minutes of this because I think
the first five or six minutes are the most important,
just to hear this woman say and again. Her name
is Amy Cruz kr Us. I'll put the link in
the show notes if you want to listen to the
rest of it. And some of the comments were kind
of refreshing. That's first thing I do when somebody sends
me a video. What's the general perception. The first one says,
you're playing with fire here, lady, hope you don't get burnt.
Then the next one says, no, we don't need to
go there. We are created in God's image. I'm not
involving period. So God bless you all. Have a wonderful week.
If I'm able to, we'll put us something. We'll try
to get a little something else out this week. I
was happy to get a classic audio out and just
everybody have a great week.
Speaker 1: God bless you.
Speaker 4: And here is from twenty seventeen, The Future of Sense
Making Human two point oh.
Speaker 3: Good afternoon.
Speaker 2: I'm here to I hope change the focus of the
conversation a little bit and start us talking about the
future of sense making something that we call human two
point zero. So about two two and a half years ago,
Thomas Friedman, the author, sat down with the director of
Google x astro Teller and they were, you know, having
an after dinner conversation. He got on a napkin and
he drew on the napkin the j curve of technology.
We've seen this curve today before right. So he drew
the J curve of technology and he said, here's where
technology is going. That's actually rate of change, right, So
it's going up and humans.
Speaker 3: Have stayed flat.
Speaker 2: Right, we are we are on a long evolutionary timescale,
right in order to in order to change. And so
the problem is is that we need to get there, right.
We need to get and join technology up that up
that Jay curve and actually change something about human adaptability.
We know that technology is not easy to keep up with.
All of us sort of have that experience. But the
problem is is that we've actually relied on technology to
actually make us perform better. And so what happens when
technology starts to surpass us and human adaptability remains flat.
So my argument or our thesis is that the future
of sense making requires us not only to embrace technology
as we are all doing, but actually enhance human brain
function so we can get further up that curve. So actually,
last night I was I was here for the dinner
last night, and somebody came up to me and said,
what are you doing here? And I assume that they
didn't mean that in a accusatory sense. I sort of meant,
you know, I figured that they meant, you know, what
are you doing here? So I actually have a really
interesting background, right. So I'm currently the Chief Science Officer
of the Platypus Institute. The Platypus Institute actually takes some
of the things that you've heard about neuroscience and cognitive
science and translates them into applications. I call myself an
applied neuroscientist.
Speaker 4: So I wanted to stop and mention real quick. Obviously
you can't see the slides that she's talking from. It's
her bio. From two thousand and five to twenty ten,
she was the DARPA Program Manager for Defense Sciences. And
again they consider this defense now, it should be very worrisome.
Speaker 2: I am a neuroscientist. I'm also a former DARPA program manager.
We heard a little bit about DARPA today from Brian Pierce.
Brian actually and I were actually colleagues together. I've been
a vice president of innovation at a small business and
then we were acquired and I was actually the chief
technology officer of a large defense business. So it's actually
a pretty rapid trajectory now, going back from academia through
the government to small business to large business, and I
think I actually have a really interesting view of how
we are a pro coaching this sort of future of
sense making and neuroscience approach. So I call it, like
I said, applied neuroscience, right, And I want to tell
you one sort of miracle. We heard a lot of
miracles today in the conversation with Bill Newsome about neuroscience. Right,
we found we're finding out all these amazing opportunities and
things that we're discovering. But I'm going to tell you
one key factor that I think is particularly important, and
it's called neuroplasticity. So neuroplasticity actually allows us to change
our brains well into adulthood.
Speaker 3: This is very important.
Speaker 2: Right when I was a graduate student, I was a
young neuroscientist, Right, we knew a couple things right at
that time, Like note what we call no new neurons, right,
adults couldn't grow new neurons, right, So that was one thing, and.
Speaker 3: Then everything was primarily fixed, right.
Speaker 2: You know, traits about yourself, maybe psychology, maybe a way
that you reacted to something. Learning was something that was
seen that happened when you were younger, but not necessarily
when you were older.
Speaker 3: And this is just patently untrue.
Speaker 2: So the first thing is that there is plasticity in
the adult brain. New neurons do grow, they grow in
specific places in the brain, but they do generate new neurons,
and we can actually influence how that happens. And then
the second thing is that we have plastic brains that
can continue learning into adulthood.
Speaker 3: And so I want you to to.
Speaker 2: Sort of like there's one thing that you're going to
sort of take home from the talk. Think about neuroplasticity
and think about the ways that we can change our brains,
both in the future of sense making, in our own
lives and in our workplaces. So when I think about
applied neuroscience, I think about two things. I think about
sort of near term things, ways that we can actually
sort of upgrade the brain with technology, and then I
think about future facing things where maybe we start to
merge ourselves with technology. So we have a concept at
Platypus that we call human two point zero, and the
human is divided in half for two reasons. One is
because we have this core capabilities that we are going
after in the short term, right, so short term goals
and emerging capabilities that we're starting to look at We
do that for a practical purpose sort of framing the
programs that we go after, but we do it also
for a very important sort of mission focused perspective that
we have within the Institute, which is never losing sight of,
you know, that future space.
Speaker 3: I've actually called them.
Speaker 2: I call them you know you've heard of moonshots, you know,
I call them moon overshots. The moon is just a
little too close for me. I'm not sure if I'm
going to hit Mars, but I'm going to I'm definitely
shooting past the moon. Right, And so we'll actually talk
about some of these capabilities as we go, but let's
focus on this first half, right, Let's focus on these
near term things that we can look at, things like
heightened intuition, focus, creativity, memory, and processing capability. Right, these
are some things that we can actually start turning the
nobs on right now. So I'm going to give you
two examples from one of my previous DARPA programs.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: So this stuff is actually pretty old, but it's pretty
new from the way that we're actually able to implement
the technology.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: So, I had a program at DARPA called Accelerated Learning.
In the Accelerated Learning program, We asked two questions. One
was do the brains of experts look different than the
brains of novices? And at the time we asked the question,
this is a very revolutionary question, right, like, wow, you
think there are brain structural or signaling differences between experts
and novices. We hypothesize there was. And then if there
are differences between novices and experts, can I do something
to the novice to get.
Speaker 3: Them further up that curve?
Speaker 2: Not necessarily turning them into expert instant experts, right, but
actually accelerating that expertise. So one of the first things
we did was actually look at marksmanship. So this is
a task that's very common and very popular across the military.
Speaker 3: Everyone has to do it.
Speaker 2: You all have to be sort of experienced and expert marksmen.
What it turns out is that these snipers actually have
a repeatable expert brain state that they're able to enter
at will. It's quantifiable, it's measurable, and you can measure
it in real time.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: So they control their breathing, they control their heart rate,
and then they actually have a measure in the front
of the brain, a particular frequency that they can actually
reproduce when they get in the zone, right, We've all
sort of had that sense of like being in the zone, right,
so they're able to put themselves in that zone at will.
What we then did was actually used a neurofeedback paradigm,
so actually showed people their own brain activity in real
time and train them very simply using simple feedback haptic
feedback or auditory or visual feedback to actually reproduce that
brain state and actually train themselves to get into the zone.
Speaker 3: What happened was their performance improved.
Speaker 2: Without them ever having to practice anymore than you know,
sort of normally going to the range and doing some
shooting like they were. So the literally the brain training
alone improve their feedback, which is really important because this
is while it's the one example, it's a template for
how we might think about using neurofeedback to actually improve performance.
Another thing that we did same program was actually look
at teams, so same kind of question, do the brains
of expert teams look different than the brains of novice teams.
We actually started this work with the Submarine Learning Center.
So the Submarine Learning Center had these expert teams that
would come in and do this very difficult navigation task.
You know, they had to navigate through this channel and
make sure they didn't run into any barriers and avoided
other boats and things that were sort of in the area.
Expert teams. You know, we've all had this sense, right.
Have you ever had the the conversation or the feeling
that you're on the same wavelength with someone, right, you're
kind of clicking, You're you're kind of in the zone together, right,
That's the same thing that expert teams did. They actually
synchronized both their physiology, not necessarily their heart rate, but
their heart rate variability and some other measures, as well
as their brain signatures. Their brains actually started to fire
together and react to stimuli together. In addition to that,
expert teams were actually able to recover from mistakes much
faster than novice teams. Novice teams, you know, made a
mistake and then you know, ended up sort of going
off into a little rat hole or ended up going
back to their individual tasks, whereas expert teams made a decision,
maybe they made a mistake, they shook it off, they
reset themselves. They had a resiliency that I think, you know,
is very important for looking at in terms of business.
So the that was the work that we did back
in the Accelerated Learning program. Similarly, our colleagues at Advanced
Brain Monitoring actually did work with MBA students solving those
like really gnarly business questions, like you know, you have
to you know, it's either you close this factory or
all these kids go into child labor or you know,
really like kind of those unsolvable problems.
Speaker 3: But you have to come up with a business solution.
Speaker 2: And what we found here again was that not only
did the teams again start to the successful teams start
to synchronize, you could actually see leadership emerge within the group.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: People started engaging and paying attention to certain people, and
those people emerged from that group as the leaders of
that group as they came together to work on that task.
So what we think is so interesting is how do
we as teams sort of foster this you know, sort
of zone and flow creation. We're interested in how we
can actually cause creativity and teams, how do you stimulate innovation.
Believe that by using an applied neuroscience techniques, we can
actually get people to synchronize faster and perhaps generate ideas
even more quickly.
Speaker 3: So these are things that we think can happen sort
of like right now.
Speaker 2: So I'm gonna go to the other half of the
ann two point zero and I'm going to talk about
the emerging capabilities.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: So, we've all.
Speaker 2: Heard of, you know, sort of you know, thinking about
sensory enhancement. Today we heard a great talk about using
haptic stimulation. There are a lot of ways that we
can actually expand our sense making as humans, and some
of those are a little kind of far out there, right,
And some of them are things that I think we're
all thinking of and maybe maybe pondering, but are.
Speaker 3: Not to not too far off so sense.
Speaker 2: Making in terms of interfaces, certainly people are familiar with
the cochlear implant, right, the ability to use an external
sensor implanted into the cochlea, which is a part of
your ear, right, the inside of your ear that actually
transduces sound.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: So that's an example of an implant of a sensory
interface that's been around for a very long time. We
have a gentleman down here who is actually someone who
has implanted an antenna in his head, in his skull
because he was born without the ability to see color.
He only sees in grayscale, and so he was an
artist and one of the things he wanted to do
was actually experiment with his own sort of sense. So
what he did was he had an antenna implanted in
his skull that actually can sense color infrared as well,
and it transduces sound waves into his head and he
interprets those now as color, which is a really interesting
sort of sensory enhancement for an individual. This sounds a
little far out, but there are literally tens of thousands
of people across the globe that have been planted magnetic
sensors in their fingertips or other types of you know,
sort of orienting devices. People have RFID tags embedded in
their arms and hands.
Speaker 3: So it's a very.
Speaker 2: Interesting space when we think about the future of sensory enhancement.
These things that were once sort of very far out
there are now much closer. My colleague Adam Pioria just
put out a book, The Bodybuilders, in which he actually
goes through sort of sensory enhancement that people are going through,
whether those are robotics or prosthetics or others. So think
about that from the perspective of sensory enhancement. We talked
about this this morning, the idea came up centawer chess,
and then freestyle chess came up.
Speaker 3: I think one of the most interesting.
Speaker 2: Ways that we're actually going to augment ourselves as humans
is the combination of machine AI.
Speaker 3: And other systems with human capabilities.
Speaker 2: Sort of had a little discussion about the centawer chess
this morning and deciding that people could do it because
it was fun. And so maybe the centawer wasn't such
a big idea, but I actually think it's very.
Speaker 3: Fundamental because if you if you.
Speaker 2: Listen to Gary Kasparov explain centaur chess, what he says
is having the machine allowed him to be more creative
in the ways that he actually expressed himself during the
chess game. And so let's think of the ways that
we can free up our own creativity by using AI systems. Now,
it's not just a flipping, you know, back and forth
between you know, something that's solving a simple task for you.
Imagine it's a very complicated planning task. One of the
things that AI is great at is giving you an
analysis of alternatives, and so maybe there's a way to
sort of combine these into into multisensory systems.
Speaker 3: I have a vision of where we're headed with this.
Speaker 2: Again, we talked about this. Brian talked about this as
well in terms of DARPA. In terms of teams, I
was on the Defense Science Board study on autonomy, and
the one thing that we.
Speaker 3: Talked about was trust.
Speaker 2: The reason that we are able to form teams with
one another and work together is the concept of trust.
And so how do you build trust across individuals, whether
they're AI team members or human team members and start
to do that. Part of that is the conversation I
think that we need to have around this space. But
trust is actually something that we build. It's not magic,
it's actually something that we build together. And so I
think we need to look at ways of teaming to
sort of approach that.
Speaker 3: And finally, I.
Speaker 2: Want to leave you with you know, sort of my
perspective on the future of sense making, with ours, with
all of us as a team.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: So again we talked about collective intelligence this morning. Now
I'm not necessarily talking about you know, an augmented or
AI team member, but the future of sense making as
us as a as a whole collective intelligence piece.
Speaker 3: Right. But one of the things that has disheartened me.
Speaker 2: I will say about social media is that I think
in some ways it's actually fractionated us. Right, we continuously
sort of potentially reinforce messages that we're sort of hearing
among our groups.
Speaker 3: And so we're talking.
Speaker 2: I've been talking with my neuroscience colleagues about ways of
actually increasing empathy, ways of building conversations across people that
are very separate.
Speaker 3: From one another.
Speaker 2: How do we rehumanize, how do we reconnect?
Speaker 3: And so if I can leave you with a final.
Speaker 2: Thought on sort of the human two point zero and
future of sense making is that I.
Speaker 3: Think one of the ways that we'll see the most.
Speaker 2: Impact from the future of sense making is ourselves coming
together in our work environments, in our family environments, and
in our lives to actually come together to be that
new sense, that collective sense.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the fact Hunder Radio Network. Just the facts,
Mammy