Speaker 1: Welcome to episode three of Dangerous rt RDS with myself
Speaker 1: Top Lobster and David aka Raven aka Miami coke Dealer
Speaker 1: aka Puerto Rican knife wielding lunatic. That's what this show's about.
Speaker 1: It's two. It's a Puerto Rican, it's a guy who
Speaker 1: looks like a perto Rican cocaine dealer and me a boomer.
Speaker 1: It's it's the mixture that we've all come to love.
Speaker 1: That's all I have to say about it. Anyways, this
Speaker 1: is episode three. We recorded it last Thursday. We talked
Speaker 1: a little bit about the Tate Brothers and bunch of
Speaker 1: stuff that's sure to piss off everybody. If you don't
Speaker 1: like spicy content, this episode ain't for you, so don't
Speaker 1: give me a hard time about it. But if you
Speaker 1: do like spicy content, well then boy, aren't you in
Speaker 1: for a treat. If you'd like to in the future,
Speaker 1: you can always subscribe to Dangerous arty rdy us and
Speaker 1: get this a little bit sooner. If not, I'll keep
Speaker 1: feeding it to you for a couple more episodes. But
Speaker 1: uh yeah, enjoy. Make sure you go over to my
Speaker 1: pillow dot com and use promo code lockdown to get
Speaker 1: all of your coziest gear MyPillow dot Com promo code
Speaker 1: Lockdown Enjoy episode three of Dangerous RTI RDS.
Speaker 2: You said you're going to release what you know? What
Speaker 2: can you tell us?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 4: Indeed, And I've been so pleased that ag Bondi and
Speaker 4: director Patel have worked with me on this. As she said,
Speaker 4: we have to make certain that these victims and it
Speaker 4: is over two hundred and fifty that their names are redacted,
Speaker 4: they are protected and Maria, this is going to be
Speaker 4: a phase one release in short order. I will have
Speaker 4: the hard copy in my hand. Ag Bondi is responsible
Speaker 4: for what will be the public release on this. She
Speaker 4: has worked diligently on this and so appreciative that we
Speaker 4: can begin to get this information that we can begin
Speaker 4: to break apart what became a global human trafficking sex
Speaker 4: trafficking ring about one hundred and fifty billion dollars your business.
Speaker 4: It is time to get some justice for these victims,
Speaker 4: for these women and children. And this will be a
Speaker 4: phase one release.
Speaker 1: There will be more to come. This is dangerous. I'm
Speaker 1: not condemning these people. I'm not saying that they're bad people.
Speaker 1: I'm saying that they're dumb Okay, you haven't figured out
Speaker 1: that you're being lied to by this machine yet. You're
Speaker 1: a fucking idiot and I can't help you anymore.
Speaker 5: Aliens, dollar collapse, demolishing of the deep state, just because
Speaker 5: they've given you as a conspiracy there is everything you
Speaker 5: want to Don't go on a victory tour just yet,
Speaker 5: and strengthen your relationship with God.
Speaker 2: I know that we're almost in World War three.
Speaker 6: I just don't really care get he retard it and
Speaker 6: everything above that and even disrespect to God.
Speaker 1: I'm somebody that thought I can fix this, and I'm
Speaker 1: starting to think about having to eat my neighbors. Welcome
Speaker 1: to Dangerous Retards, Episode three. I'm Clint Russell, host Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 1: We got the we got the Nephil and Desk squad
Speaker 1: boys in the house. We got top lops and David
Speaker 1: ak Raven. What's up, gentlemen, We're about to get some
Speaker 1: some Epstein disclosures. This happening, dude.
Speaker 2: I'm excited that we're going live.
Speaker 5: What I'm hoping is that whatever they're going to disseminate
Speaker 5: happens while we're doing this show. So I got to
Speaker 5: keep an eye on the feed because I'd love to
Speaker 5: bring it up, but yeah, I mean that's that's the rumor.
Speaker 5: I don't know if it's true. Smart money's on, it's not.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna just make stuff up as we go, like
Speaker 5: I've been doing. I made up the headline before we
Speaker 5: change a headline. Clint said, we can't lie to the people.
Speaker 5: I'm like, I forgot. This isn't my show, this is
Speaker 5: our show. This is communism. This is the people's show.
Speaker 6: So what we're gonna see here with the Epstein files,
Speaker 6: I think we're going to see a lot of what
Speaker 6: we already know. They're doing some kind of sports betting
Speaker 6: app I forget the name of it where they're they're
Speaker 6: betting on who we're going to see whose names will
Speaker 6: be released? And I think jay Z's at the top.
Speaker 6: But that entire list is not really surprising. It's nothing
Speaker 6: that conspiracy theorists are people that were in the know,
Speaker 6: haven't been saying for years already. So I guess it's
Speaker 6: just more confirmation, which I don't know what that.
Speaker 5: Let me ask you guys, this my my guy, the
Speaker 5: one that I want to be on the list because
Speaker 5: I know that he's tied into this, and I need
Speaker 5: to see him go down. I think that we're going
Speaker 5: to see Tom Hanks and I don't know what we
Speaker 5: can say as far as accusations. I think Tom Hanks
Speaker 5: is going to.
Speaker 1: Be on the list.
Speaker 2: Who's your guy?
Speaker 1: Who do you?
Speaker 5: Who do you think if if they're not on the list,
Speaker 5: this is bullshit?
Speaker 1: Oh, Bill Gates for sure. If Bill is removed from
Speaker 1: that list, then this is all bullshit. But my expectation
Speaker 1: is that he will be on it. I do think
Speaker 1: that they will will disclose big chunks. I don't think
Speaker 1: that Bill Gates will be on the first disclosure honestly,
Speaker 1: Like I'll tell you, if it's just jay Z is
Speaker 1: like he gets the brunt of this, I'd be like,
Speaker 1: this is racist. And I'm getting ahead of that. I
Speaker 1: never say this is racist, but if it's just jay Z,
Speaker 1: I would be like, this is racist because there were
Speaker 1: so many white people that were involved with this.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, I don't even really expect jay Z to
Speaker 6: be on this list specifically. I think jay Z was
Speaker 6: I think that our elites keep it segregated a bit.
Speaker 6: He was on He should be on the Diddy list,
Speaker 6: which is not going to be That information is not
Speaker 6: being disseminated just yet.
Speaker 5: These are both guys top that are supposedly running sexual
Speaker 5: blackmail operations out of the Virgin Islands, So the difference
Speaker 5: here is really just a small gap of water.
Speaker 2: They could probably wave.
Speaker 5: To each other from the sandy beaches of Molestation Island,
Speaker 5: you know, respectively to Epstein's.
Speaker 1: Or I'm sure.
Speaker 6: I'm sure this is not a new thought, but it
Speaker 6: is funny how it's like the Virgin Islands, right, like
Speaker 6: they it's constantly this wordplay that they're doing Virginia Roberts
Speaker 6: Bernie made off this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: It's like right in your face that you end in
Speaker 1: the Virgin Islands a virgin, you leave a victim.
Speaker 6: It's pleasure Island, or you never leave. I'm interested to
Speaker 6: see if we get any Republican names on here, and
Speaker 6: not just Republican names, but Republicans that are not like
Speaker 6: not like rhinos, like like you know, there's people that
Speaker 6: are now being dragged through the media like Dan Crenshaw
Speaker 6: and Mitch McConnell who have like they're obvious bad guy Republicans.
Speaker 6: So if these guys' names pop up on this list,
Speaker 6: I'll be like, okay, whatever. But if some of our
Speaker 6: favorite people. If their names pop up on this list,
Speaker 6: then then I feel like we'll be getting something a
Speaker 6: little bit more legitimate in something we didn't know. Like
Speaker 6: if a Ray Paul pops up, I'll be like, holy shit,
Speaker 6: like what is Yeah?
Speaker 1: That would be that would be well. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: my expectation is that you won't see any sitting Republicans named,
Speaker 1: and that this is my deep fear about this entire
Speaker 1: disclosure process is that because it's now I mean, I
Speaker 1: guess everything's always partisan, but because this is particularly partisan,
Speaker 1: because this is the new you know, Trump round two
Speaker 1: team that's responsible for these releases, I just find it
Speaker 1: very hard to believe that they're gonna sacrifice the party
Speaker 1: because I mean, you have to leave Congress if your
Speaker 1: name it like not if you're just on the flight log,
Speaker 1: but if it if there's evidence, if there's investigations into
Speaker 1: you actually participating in underage things, you've gots to go.
Speaker 1: So or is the Republican Party willing to actually sacrifice
Speaker 1: their slim majority to seek justice. Probably not. So that's
Speaker 1: that's my concern, is like, once you have this information,
Speaker 1: it actually it benefits Trump to to just hold it
Speaker 1: over their heads and use it as leverage to get
Speaker 1: them to vote his his direction. So I hope that
Speaker 1: I'm wrong, and I hope that they'll pursue justice above
Speaker 1: you know, parties in politics. But I'd be very surprised
Speaker 1: if that's the case.
Speaker 6: Well, you know, Republicans though, they they do have this
Speaker 6: nature right all throughout COVID and even before COVID, they
Speaker 6: have this nature to be virtuous in a sense, so
Speaker 6: they they will more than likely put up some of
Speaker 6: their own to their own detriment, you know, like sacrifice
Speaker 6: their own to their own detriment rather but progressive stick together,
Speaker 6: they're not going to ever do that.
Speaker 1: That's I'd be interested to see.
Speaker 6: This is a good marker right where the Republican Party
Speaker 6: or this whatever, this Maga movement, wherever this is at.
Speaker 6: Are they the same Republican Party of old that's willing
Speaker 6: to shoot themselves in the leg for some kind of
Speaker 6: I don't know, virtue signal or are they about power
Speaker 6: this time?
Speaker 1: Well, no, it's it wouldn't shooting themselves in the leg
Speaker 1: for a virtue signal, would be shooting themselves in the
Speaker 1: leg for justice to do the right thing, right, you know,
Speaker 1: My it's it's unfortunate, But I did agree with you.
Speaker 1: I don't think that they're going to do that, and
Speaker 1: I don't think that they are above, you know, parties
Speaker 1: in angling and doing cover ups to benefit their own
Speaker 1: political ends. But I will say this, this is a
Speaker 1: once in a lifetime opportunity for the GOP to reclaim
Speaker 1: the moral high ground for in perpetuity. Like if they
Speaker 1: especially after this was buried for so long, if they
Speaker 1: disclose all of it, if they if they sing some
Speaker 1: of their own people and they seek a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of the Democrats and they see a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: corporate America and they just say, look, we're bringing justice
Speaker 1: back to this country. You don't get to traffic children
Speaker 1: to the wealthy and powerful elite and get away with it.
Speaker 1: We're putting all of you away forever. Like that will
Speaker 1: reinstill so much faith in the system, the DOJ, the FBI,
Speaker 1: all of these institutions. And if they don't do that, well,
Speaker 1: then don't expect me to trust any of you motherfuckers
Speaker 1: ever again. And that's that's the reality. So that's that's
Speaker 1: the path that they have to choose. Now, let me
Speaker 1: be very clear, I don't think that's going to happen today.
Speaker 1: Regardless of what the actual end goal of this disclosure
Speaker 1: process is, they've been very clear it's going to come
Speaker 1: in waves. So this is going to be a partial
Speaker 1: disclosure today. Probably a week from now, we'll get a
Speaker 1: little bit more, a little bit more, a little bit
Speaker 1: more now. Allegedly that's because they're working on prosecutions. If
Speaker 1: that's the case, cool, I'm on board with delaying it
Speaker 1: as long as you're working on prosecutions. If that's not
Speaker 1: the case. If you're delaying it because you're running cover
Speaker 1: for your people, well then fuck you. So that's the divide.
Speaker 2: I'm so wondering if we're going to see this whole.
Speaker 5: I mean, we talked about who you would expect to
Speaker 5: see on the list, and if you didn't see them,
Speaker 5: that that would mean that the list is bunk and
Speaker 5: the person that we left out I have expected one
Speaker 5: of us to mention. Bill Clinton is supposedly on Chila
Speaker 5: Alita Express upwards of like twenty seven times. I'm not
Speaker 5: sure if that's the accurate number, but he's the most
Speaker 5: prolific attendee on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane, the Lolita express, and.
Speaker 1: He's such a given. I didn't even like think.
Speaker 2: To mention that that's that's kind of where my head
Speaker 2: was at too.
Speaker 5: And what's wild is this is to your point, clint
Speaker 5: it's such a given. Most of the you know, the
Speaker 5: the population is pretty comfortable with the idea that he
Speaker 5: was involved in this, or at least those who are
Speaker 5: paying attention. He's kind of had like an era of
Speaker 5: in vulnerability around him for a while. The Clintons can
Speaker 5: get away with murder and pun intended, you know. So
Speaker 5: I wonder if we're at least going to see Bill
Speaker 5: Clinton offered up as a sacrificial lamb in this instance,
Speaker 5: and maybe we're going to see that that veil of
Speaker 5: in vulnerability fall away from the Clintons. And because I
Speaker 5: think that if there's anybody that's going to be exposed
Speaker 5: for high levels of corruption and human trafficking, given his
Speaker 5: attendance on the flights and and given the the euphemism
Speaker 5: of the Hillary Clinton or the Clinton body list, right,
Speaker 5: all these people that have pushed again them in one
Speaker 5: way or another and then mysteriously died of like strange
Speaker 5: suicide instances, I wonder if that's going to go away
Speaker 5: or not.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't.
Speaker 6: I don't think that these people really have the power
Speaker 6: that they used to anymore. They've lost they they've lost
Speaker 6: the popular consensus and things are definitely turning on them.
Speaker 6: That which is which is also why I think it's okay,
Speaker 6: this is an okay time now to purge this.
Speaker 1: Entire political class.
Speaker 6: Like they've played their role and now the people on
Speaker 6: this list are going to be these old actors. And
Speaker 6: it's almost like, what do they do to the brown Shirts?
Speaker 6: Right right afterward, right after the revolution? They just you're
Speaker 6: you're the first ones against the wall. And that's kind
Speaker 6: of what this feels like. It's a it's definitely a
Speaker 6: political revolution, and the players now are done with these
Speaker 6: previous players. They have their pieces set up and they're
Speaker 6: ready to move into the next phase. So it's like,
Speaker 6: you guys are out, we have really no need for you,
Speaker 6: and the public wants blood and we'll see if we
Speaker 6: get it.
Speaker 5: But I just want to say I agree with that
Speaker 5: sentiment so much so that if if you guys remember
Speaker 5: I've said this on this show, I've said it on
Speaker 5: Liberty Lockdown when we made our appearances there. Nephelum des
Speaker 5: Squad at nauseum. I do believe that we're going to
Speaker 5: see the pendulum swing in such a way that it's
Speaker 5: gonna favor the Trump administration, you know, head and shoulders
Speaker 5: above anybody else. It's gonna be I've been calling it
Speaker 5: the Trump vindication train.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 5: We're gonna continue to see these wins upon wins upon wins.
Speaker 5: We're gonna visit old topics like the Epstein flight log,
Speaker 5: like the Russian collusion thing. All these things are gonna
Speaker 5: get dragged out into the light. This is just through
Speaker 5: my thinking process. If this is what I think it is,
Speaker 5: and so you know, to your point, Clint, whether or
Speaker 5: not he's gonna throw fellow Republicans under the bus, I
Speaker 5: kind of expect to see that come to pass. I
Speaker 5: think we're gonna get a real big, what would you
Speaker 5: call it, like gratification from this. Finally, the public's gonna
Speaker 5: have a sigh of relief. These topics that we've not
Speaker 5: been able to get any closure on, I think we
Speaker 5: are going to get closure on them.
Speaker 2: But I think it's to our detriment.
Speaker 5: I think it's actually to bolster Trump and his administration
Speaker 5: and elevate them to a place where the public will
Speaker 5: trust them enough to give them the keys of the kingdom.
Speaker 1: Well, in some ways, I hope you're right. I mean,
Speaker 1: not the negative connotation of them building trust and then
Speaker 1: using it for nefarious ends, but rather it would be
Speaker 1: very healthy for this country to feel as if, like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you can't traffic kids, Okay, very nice? Yeah, yeah, like
Speaker 1: that would be a really good thing. And especially if
Speaker 1: you're in political power, you definitely can't get away with that.
Speaker 1: And as of now, the evidence is completely one hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty degrees away from that that you can absolutely
Speaker 1: do whatever you want to children, and you can get
Speaker 1: away with it for fucking decades and decades and decades.
Speaker 1: That is just a paradigm that is untenable. It's a
Speaker 1: paradigm I don't enjoy living under, and it's got to change.
Speaker 1: So I hope you're right. I hope that they'll actually
Speaker 1: bring justice to these people. I just don't have nearly
Speaker 1: the confidence that you guys do that this is actually
Speaker 1: going to happen, like it seems to me. It seems
Speaker 1: to me as if this has been delayed for years.
Speaker 1: I mean, this was delayed through Trump's first presidency. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so like for people to expect it to change because
Speaker 1: Trump's in power is like, well, what happened the first
Speaker 1: go so now his second term has been far better
Speaker 1: so far. And that doesn't mean that he's not capable
Speaker 1: of doing the right thing here. But it's going to
Speaker 1: sink some of his political allies. That's just the reality.
Speaker 1: If you're going to really tell the truth about this,
Speaker 1: you're going to sink a bunch of your political allies.
Speaker 1: Is he prepared to do that? I'd say probably not.
Speaker 5: I don't I'm not trying to bolster Trump here, But
Speaker 5: what is worth mentioning is probably around twenty nineteen, we
Speaker 5: were reaching like critical mass in the public sentiment involving
Speaker 5: the Jeffrey Epstein case, to the extent that it became
Speaker 5: a meme Epstein didn't kill himself. Even if you weren't
Speaker 5: in the know, even if you weren't a conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 5: this thing almost penetrated pop culture in very many ways,
Speaker 5: oh today. And what put a kebash on that was
Speaker 5: the fact that we rolled straight into the lockdowns, and
Speaker 5: so in very many ways that took the forefront of
Speaker 5: the public's concerns right that that sort of, for lack
Speaker 5: of a better term, trumped.
Speaker 1: Didn't it happen during the lockdowns? Or am I just
Speaker 1: remembering this?
Speaker 5: It happened at the tail end of twenty nineteen, I
Speaker 5: believe is when Epstein was.
Speaker 2: For the second time. I don't know if you guys
Speaker 2: can find no.
Speaker 1: No, but when did he die in jail?
Speaker 5: Though he died I think before twenty twenty hit officially,
Speaker 5: or if he did die in twenty twenty, it was
Speaker 5: almost immediately in the beginning, because in the beginning of
Speaker 5: twenty twenty, is.
Speaker 1: He died right when Kobe died? God damn it sometime
Speaker 1: around there.
Speaker 6: Yeah, he died on August tenth, twenty nineteen, damn, right
Speaker 6: before the pandemic. As a matter of fact, probably when
Speaker 6: this stuff was actually released, because September. September is when
Speaker 6: it was released.
Speaker 5: Like it was like bang bang, And that's my that's
Speaker 5: been my suspicion is that, Wow, that's crazy, right, this
Speaker 5: thing happened because is you know, we were getting too
Speaker 5: close to something else, and that that something else has
Speaker 5: massive implications. Right, we're talking about whether or not they're
Speaker 5: going to release these Epstein files, and you know, Clint's right,
Speaker 5: they're going to release them in stages I don't know
Speaker 5: if we're ever going to get the gratification that we want.
Speaker 5: I suspect that we might. However, what is clear, just
Speaker 5: to harken back to last episode, is this is going
Speaker 5: to be a bit of a band aid ripoff in
Speaker 5: the sense that the ripples.
Speaker 1: I'm convinced then there.
Speaker 5: You go, the ripples that this thing can cause if
Speaker 5: we do see it come to fruition in the way
Speaker 5: that it should. It's going to go across party lines,
Speaker 5: right It's it's gonna involve Republicans and Democrats and YadA YadA.
Speaker 2: But it's also going.
Speaker 5: To involve people who have their hands on the controls
Speaker 5: of America right now.
Speaker 2: And what's gonna happen?
Speaker 5: What sort of turmoil or chaos are we going to
Speaker 5: go through when all of a sudden the people that
Speaker 5: are running things are too busy trying to avoid calls
Speaker 5: for I don't know, beheadings something like that. I mean,
Speaker 5: in my opinion, and I know that's that's a fantastic
Speaker 5: thing to say. It's it's sensational in very many ways,
Speaker 5: But what what ramifications await a person who is involved
Speaker 5: in something like this.
Speaker 1: Well, if you believe in hell, the deepest, hottest, worst
Speaker 1: parts of it, Like there is there is no there
Speaker 1: is no justice that that is, you know, equal to
Speaker 1: the injustice that you wrought upon a child like that.
Speaker 1: So so whatever, like I don't you know, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: a very like peaceful and forgiving person. But like when
Speaker 1: it comes to that, just whatever is done to you,
Speaker 1: I don't have a problem with it.
Speaker 5: There's a question for you, for both of you guys, Actually,
Speaker 5: what would the libertarians say to that idea of the
Speaker 5: the government getting involved with with like let's say, uh,
Speaker 5: firing squad executions.
Speaker 1: Well, we support, like, we don't support the death penalty
Speaker 1: by the government. That doesn't mean that I don't support
Speaker 1: self defense and I don't support a father defending their child. So,
Speaker 1: like you have the capacity to to bring you know, justice,
Speaker 1: just to put it safely, if you were to catch
Speaker 1: the person in the act, you could absolutely do whatever
Speaker 1: you want to them as far as I'm concerned. But
Speaker 1: in terms of entrusting the government, I still don't trust
Speaker 1: the government. So I don't believe in the death penalty
Speaker 1: because I don't want to see innocent people put to death.
Speaker 1: But like if a father walks in and he sees
Speaker 1: they're being you know, attacked by a predator.
Speaker 5: Free open open season buddy. Yeah, so then what happens
Speaker 5: if this is proven in hindsight? You know, you don't
Speaker 5: catch them in the act. This is no I know.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is why, this is why I don't like,
Speaker 1: you just can't live in a civilization that that allows
Speaker 1: for people to go, well, you've been you've been convicted.
Speaker 1: So now I guess we let the father just go
Speaker 1: down to piece.
Speaker 2: It's like, I like that, Honestly, that's a great I
Speaker 2: really enjoy that.
Speaker 6: This is what we're seeing with like these these pedo videos.
Speaker 6: Right the guy we watched yesterday on twerget, he throws
Speaker 6: the Chinese guy in the air and then slap him.
Speaker 6: It's hilarious, but it is it does bring the question.
Speaker 6: They was like, well, have you got the wrong guy?
Speaker 6: Like another guy they I saw they hit him with
Speaker 6: some like it was a heavy object and knock this
Speaker 6: dude out, And I'm like, if this is the wrong guy,
Speaker 6: this is just a salt So I get I understand
Speaker 6: where the libertarians are coming at coming from with this
Speaker 6: sort of thing where it's like I don't want to
Speaker 6: stay involved with doling out this sort of punishment because
Speaker 6: they get it wrong a lot. But it feels like
Speaker 6: in this instance, the libertarians might even be like, well, yeah,
Speaker 6: we gotta kind.
Speaker 1: Of kill them.
Speaker 6: Well, here's here's a question for this. This is an
Speaker 6: important one. So I don't really care about who's on
Speaker 6: the list. It's not it's not that I don't care.
Speaker 6: I just feel like, well, we'll get what we expected.
Speaker 6: What I care about is the rest of these files.
Speaker 6: What else is The list is one thing, but what
Speaker 6: they did was another. So if you watch the Netflix documentary,
Speaker 6: is like they were getting massages by sixteen year old
Speaker 6: girls and some things got kind of inappropriate. You might
Speaker 6: have pinched their thoughts, and they didn't treat them very good.
Speaker 6: Is a big difference between what I think was actually
Speaker 6: happening on this island. With the you know that we
Speaker 6: have the Owl of Minerva on this Saturnian like synagogue. Yeah,
Speaker 6: with with a bunch of a bunch of caves and
Speaker 6: tunnels underneath his island. There's a lot of there's some
Speaker 6: more things going on. Let's let's go back to that that.
Speaker 6: I mean, don't play the clip again, but the opening
Speaker 6: clip that we ran, she's saying this was a I
Speaker 6: think she said hundreds or tens of billions of dollars
Speaker 6: industry annually.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but you don't make billions of dollars trafficking
Speaker 1: human beings unless these are kids, because that's something that
Speaker 1: you could charge an immense amount of money for. I'm guessing,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but like a prostitute, even if it's
Speaker 1: a super high end prostitute that's of legal age, talking
Speaker 1: what five thousand bucks or something like, I don't, I
Speaker 1: don't know about in an industry, that's not enough to
Speaker 1: make billions as well. I'm saying it's.
Speaker 5: Also not enough to blackmail anybody in any real series exactly, right, So.
Speaker 1: Then, is that is that where they were monetizing was
Speaker 1: it was the monetization coming from blackmail where you get
Speaker 1: someone basically sleeping with a prostitute who is who appears
Speaker 1: to be legal age but is sixteen, and then and
Speaker 1: then you show them the video and you say, hey,
Speaker 1: I need a billion dollars, you know, like I don't,
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know how they monetize this thing.
Speaker 1: But my point is, in order for it to be
Speaker 1: a billion dollar industry, it has to be something more
Speaker 1: than legal age prostitution. And we already know. I mean,
Speaker 1: Virginia Giuffrey and a bunch of other people have said
Speaker 1: they were under age when this process began. So that's
Speaker 1: my expectation. That was much much bigger than what we've
Speaker 1: been told so far. I mean, it could it could
Speaker 1: be all all those things. Right.
Speaker 6: So yeah, right, so you you've partaken and now you
Speaker 6: owe me money. I think it's more of like you've partaken,
Speaker 6: now you owe me favor, because that's like, that's what
Speaker 6: I want. I want what you can do for me,
Speaker 6: rather than money. Money is fungible, it's actually garbage now.
Speaker 6: But I think the money that we're talking about here
Speaker 6: is the facilitators, how much they would have to pay
Speaker 6: cartel members or people who are operating in these black
Speaker 6: markets to get the clientele or get the product, the
Speaker 6: hot dogs, the pizza to the people who will pay
Speaker 6: for it. So the people who are paying for it,
Speaker 6: that's where you're getting a lot of damn money. And
Speaker 6: they're moving these children or I don't know, like young women,
Speaker 6: sometimes men, sometimes you name it. It's just a human
Speaker 6: trafficking thing, and it's probably very expensive because it's illegal
Speaker 6: It's like.
Speaker 1: My expectation too, is that many of these victims are
Speaker 1: no longer with us, Like, especially if you believe that
Speaker 1: they were doing it with you know, younger than sixteen seventeen.
Speaker 1: Like we've as far as I know, we've never heard
Speaker 1: from those people, Like they've never come out and talked.
Speaker 1: And I just find it hard to believe that if
Speaker 1: you're if you're willing to traffic sixteen and seventeen year
Speaker 1: olds to the rich and powerful, that you're not willing
Speaker 1: to traffic eleven and twelve year olds to the rich
Speaker 1: and powerful.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what do you have a moral quandary?
Speaker 1: Yeah, like you've already crossed the line. You've already demonstrated
Speaker 1: that you're one of the worst people on the planet.
Speaker 1: Why would you stop there? So the fact that we've
Speaker 1: never heard from those kids makes me feel like they
Speaker 1: were killed.
Speaker 2: So so there is some.
Speaker 1: Just to be clear, I'm reaching here, I don't know,
Speaker 1: you know, but that's just kind of like you have
Speaker 1: an island, you're building all of this leverage, it's a
Speaker 1: billion dollar industry that you're running, Like it just feels
Speaker 1: as if this is much darker than what we've been
Speaker 1: told through the press.
Speaker 5: And to that, I would say, there were anecdotal reports
Speaker 5: coming out. You know, it's kind of the fog of
Speaker 5: war situation. It's hard to determine what is real and
Speaker 5: what isn't when an event first takes place.
Speaker 2: But when Epstein first was.
Speaker 5: First arrested for the second time, the most popular time,
Speaker 5: there were a lot of reports coming out. For example,
Speaker 5: somebody allegedly queued them off and before there was a
Speaker 5: raid on the island, they were allegedly able to fill
Speaker 5: in the subterranean levels with concrete, So somebody tipped them
Speaker 5: off and gave them enough time to do that, if
Speaker 5: you believe that. Also, another one that's if you believe,
Speaker 5: is that when they were investigating the island they found
Speaker 5: allegedly a substantial amount of children's bones in one particular
Speaker 5: location on the island on the coast that washed up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I remember hearing that. When you hear a bunch
Speaker 2: of stuff, right.
Speaker 5: There was a video that came out or a picture
Speaker 5: from an aerial POV of somebody talking to I look
Speaker 5: like a landscaper. I don't say that because they were Mexican.
Speaker 5: I think it was just because the gear they had
Speaker 5: on looked like a landscaper for the employee on the island,
Speaker 5: and who was talking to them.
Speaker 2: It looked like Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 5: And so there was a lot of you know, when
Speaker 5: it comes to that fog of warshit going on.
Speaker 6: Wasn't there another there was another drone video that kind
Speaker 6: of peeked inside of a window there and there was
Speaker 6: just like a bunch of.
Speaker 1: Beds, mattress.
Speaker 5: There's always a mattress, right, Well, there was a video
Speaker 5: that came out allegedly from Epstein's island. No way to verify,
Speaker 5: but certainly the video was real. In my estimation, that
Speaker 5: was just the impression that I got from it. I
Speaker 5: can't say where it was from, but what you saw
Speaker 5: the scene was sort of a bathhouse. The room looked proportionate,
Speaker 5: looked like it could very well have been in that,
Speaker 5: you know, part of that structure, even the decorps and
Speaker 5: the overall atmosphere. It was kind of that of like
Speaker 5: Greek temples maybe is kind of the vibe they were
Speaker 5: going with. And there were children that, as far as
Speaker 5: I can tell, were I'm talking like seven eight nine
Speaker 5: year olds and they're walking around in togas and they
Speaker 5: are serving men and this is only the only footage
Speaker 5: you got there wasn't anything really harrowing, But the implications
Speaker 5: of that are, like, even if that wasn't Epstein's island,
Speaker 5: who the hell is waiting or getting waited on by
Speaker 5: children that are scantily clad in Greek style robe that
Speaker 5: are bringing them food and drink as there.
Speaker 1: I've never heard of, never heard of or seen that video.
Speaker 1: If it's If it's real, obviously that's very very troubling.
Speaker 1: But that's kind of my expectation is like, so if
Speaker 1: if Epstein is just trafficking, said like people that look
Speaker 1: almost like adults but aren't just to get coppromot, Like
Speaker 1: I just don't think that you killed that guy in jail,
Speaker 1: Like I don't think you go to that length, Like
Speaker 1: I think you go to that length if you are
Speaker 1: dealing with like young child trafficking. Yeah, And you know
Speaker 1: that's that's my expectation. I'm not saying anything factually. This
Speaker 1: is just like how I read these read the tea leaves.
Speaker 1: It just seems like it has to be darker than
Speaker 1: what we've been told. And as of now, what we've
Speaker 1: been told is like everybody was, you know, sixteen seventeen
Speaker 1: and Uh, yeah.
Speaker 5: I think that Netflix documentary was damage control to Top's point,
Speaker 5: because one of the things besides the sixteen seventeen year
Speaker 5: olds that they dropped was the idea that kind of
Speaker 5: loosely it seemed they were eluding to Gisline or Gisline
Speaker 5: Maxwell was not the willing participant that we take her for.
Speaker 5: In fact, Jeffrey Epstein was this mastermind that compelled her
Speaker 5: or another.
Speaker 1: Are you guys aware of this this picture here that
Speaker 1: I'm showing.
Speaker 2: You, Yeah, what's his name? The newscaster.
Speaker 6: This is the well the family house of Anderson Cooper,
Speaker 6: and then on the right is uh.
Speaker 1: Works artwork and yeah, those are those aren't sixteen seventeen
Speaker 1: year olds? Those are kids? Correct?
Speaker 6: No, there's no reason to even be number one drawing
Speaker 6: this number two buying it. So there is something there.
Speaker 6: There is some weird stuff going on. I wonder if
Speaker 6: we're going to actually find out and see that stuff.
Speaker 6: That's that that's what it's important. What you just touched
Speaker 6: on there? Uh, you know Tony Podesta's artwork that's that's
Speaker 6: all over his house is I would say, if you're
Speaker 6: watching this show and you're not familiar with that, just
Speaker 6: search it up on X and you will see a
Speaker 6: man who is quite well be quite the prolific collector
Speaker 6: of art, and all of the art is of the
Speaker 6: same nature. It is always children being abused. And I
Speaker 6: don't know what functioning adult man you know, makes all
Speaker 6: his decore that of children being abused, but it certainly
Speaker 6: doesn't bode well.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I mean the type of dude that participates
Speaker 1: in Epstein Island. If it's as if it's as depraved
Speaker 1: as I tend to believe it is, I mean this,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you the other way. We know, if these
Speaker 1: disclosures are going to be real, you will see a
Speaker 1: rash of self harm from.
Speaker 5: Yeah, within the QAnon narrative, that's called suicide weekend, I think.
Speaker 1: And if you're just going to say it, then we'll
Speaker 1: just say it suicide.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, that's right. Is that a word we can't say.
Speaker 5: I'm sorry, we're supposed to not.
Speaker 1: But anyways, that's what I was hinting at, obviously, and
Speaker 1: you know I'm not. Just to be clear, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying this about Gene Hackman, who died last night with
Speaker 1: his wife and his dog with the very unusual circumstance. Actually,
Speaker 1: if you top if one of you wants to run
Speaker 1: that clip. I shared it in the group chat. It's
Speaker 1: it's the breaking news story about Gene Hackman being found
Speaker 1: dead last night. It's like, just to be clear, not
Speaker 1: saying Gene is one of these people. It is. The
Speaker 1: circumstances of his death are odd. But my expectation is
Speaker 1: that if these disclosures are going to be far reaching,
Speaker 1: then you'll see a ton of people killing themselves. Yeah,
Speaker 1: a ton.
Speaker 6: I remember last week I think Tim Poole shared it
Speaker 6: was like a line grap statistic of Google Google searches
Speaker 6: and some of them were a criminal defense lawyer, Rico
Speaker 6: law statute of limitations of the One of them was suicide,
Speaker 6: Like how to do it? I was like, amazing, these
Speaker 6: people are this useless.
Speaker 5: But at the end of the day, they are all
Speaker 5: members of the government and if I can kind of inept, So, yeah.
Speaker 6: Can I get someone? Can I get a Mexican to
Speaker 6: do this for me? It's like that would be murder
Speaker 6: is a little different. We have to keep the border
Speaker 6: open just to assist me with suicide. That's our version
Speaker 6: of how to open up the Canadian border.
Speaker 1: Little bit of that assist I need mad. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I mean, like I said, it's part of the q
Speaker 5: Andon narrative. And just to give some clarity on that,
Speaker 5: it's like, I look at the q andon narrative as
Speaker 5: being compelling, but I do think it's a psychological operation
Speaker 5: that is lying in a fundamental way, but is using
Speaker 5: truths that seem to be, you know, unraveling around us
Speaker 5: as we speak, to lead the conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Community in one way or another.
Speaker 5: So there's a lot of veracity, I think, in my opinion,
Speaker 5: to a lot of the not predictions that the community makes,
Speaker 5: but a lot of the coded language that Q disseminates.
Speaker 2: And all of this is.
Speaker 5: Basically painting a picture of Donald Trump being this savior figure,
Speaker 5: savior of what you know, traffic children is the crux
Speaker 5: of it. And yes, so within that there is this
Speaker 5: I won't I guess I won't say it again, but
Speaker 5: this deletion self deletion weekend that we should expect to see.
Speaker 1: Here's a potential example we don't know al.
Speaker 3: Ris the Associated Press now looking at the sheriff's search
Speaker 3: warrant and saying that, according to the sheriff, Hackman was
Speaker 3: found dead on Wednesday. As I mentioned, Hackman was in
Speaker 3: a mud room. His wife, Betsy was found dead in
Speaker 3: the bathroom.
Speaker 1: Next to a space heater.
Speaker 3: The AP also reporting there was an open prescription bottle
Speaker 3: and pills scattered as they put it on the countertop
Speaker 3: near Betsy Arakawa. So we're getting developing information.
Speaker 1: So there you go. You know, I'm actually look, Jean
Speaker 1: gene Heckman is from Hoosiers. He's an actor. Okay, okay, Well,
Speaker 1: I mean Hoosiers is like one of the probably the
Speaker 1: best sports movie ever made. It was eighties, nineties, no
Speaker 1: eighties or nineties, but he played the head coach to
Speaker 1: the Indiana Hoosiers and it's just a fantastic movie. But
Speaker 1: the yeah, he's I mean, he was in his mid nineties,
Speaker 1: so it's like it's not that unusual for him to
Speaker 1: die at that age. But the circumstances by which he
Speaker 1: is wife who was in her sixties and his dog died,
Speaker 1: like clearly something happened. If it was carbon monoxide, then
Speaker 1: like that would be a fair explanation. But then one
Speaker 1: of the dogs survived, which is weird. And then also
Speaker 1: to find the prescription pills laying next to the wife,
Speaker 1: it's like, all right, this is probably not carbon monoxide.
Speaker 1: Oh I wasn't aware of that part. Well that's what
Speaker 1: just said in the in the clip. Yeah, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: a that's a big part right there.
Speaker 5: Man.
Speaker 6: We could be we could be seen like like I
Speaker 6: like I said, there's an old guard that's moving out,
Speaker 6: and they're not going to be moving out in a
Speaker 6: pretty way.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 6: This new guard is upset with what they've done and
Speaker 6: how they've been treated. And yeah, I think we're gonna
Speaker 6: see a lot of this over the the next couple
Speaker 6: of man, maybe a couple of weeks, months, days, even.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I don't know Hackman, but I can see here,
Speaker 5: you know, shout out to Chrispy says French connection. He
Speaker 5: was in Get Shorty Guy says, I don't think I've
Speaker 5: seen a Hackman film I didn't enjoy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he.
Speaker 5: Was in every movie back in the eighties. And I
Speaker 5: may not know him, but that sounds a lot.
Speaker 1: Like you'll know him. There's no way you have him
Speaker 1: in movies the bird Cage.
Speaker 5: So I mean, look, this is this guy fits the
Speaker 5: bill because who is supposed to have partaken in this
Speaker 5: you know, horrifying uh you know, venture of trafficking children.
Speaker 5: It's the elites, right, so we speculated if jay Z
Speaker 5: is going to be on there or whoever. These are
Speaker 5: what I will say about the client tell that seems
Speaker 5: to be surrounding this, this situation. They were the top
Speaker 5: of the food chain when it comes to influence. Uh,
Speaker 5: you know, so the highest level of politician, the highest
Speaker 5: level of Hollywood elite is who's who's partaking in.
Speaker 1: This in the music industry and the music industry.
Speaker 6: So now look at so today's news is, uh, Donald
Speaker 6: Trump americanizes the Tape Brothers or he I guess he
Speaker 6: allows them safe passage into the United States. Because this
Speaker 6: is the new media, this is the new who they're
Speaker 6: this is who they're presenting us now as our new
Speaker 6: role model. So movie stars and musicians are out, political influencers,
Speaker 6: social media influencers are in, and Donald Trump seems to have.
Speaker 6: I mean, I don't understand to what level he's even
Speaker 6: aware of the Tape Brothers. Maybe through Baron Trump or
Speaker 6: something like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Alena Haba, who's I forget what her position is
Speaker 1: in the Trump camp, but she's she's done interviews with
Speaker 1: the Tape Brothers. She speaks very highly of them, so
Speaker 1: it's clear that she advocated on their behalf. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure like exactly why. It sounds like you were going
Speaker 1: somewhere with that, so keep on. No, I mean I was.
Speaker 6: I was just making the point that, like this is happening,
Speaker 6: We're moving from one error to the next, and these
Speaker 6: these are the people that are being prescribed as the
Speaker 6: people we should be listening to and enjoying and getting
Speaker 6: our news from it. I enjoy Andrew Tate. I don't
Speaker 6: really have anything bad to say about them, besides some
Speaker 6: of the criticisms about you know where physician young where
Speaker 6: he's leading young men.
Speaker 1: But I do enjoy him a lot more.
Speaker 6: Than a Gene Hackman or like you know this whoever
Speaker 6: I was supposed to be listening to before.
Speaker 5: To me, it does go it tracks though, right, I mean,
Speaker 5: didn't the White House offer podcasters and influencers media press
Speaker 5: or a press pass recently?
Speaker 1: And I know we dude, can you imagine if fucking
Speaker 1: Andrew and Tristan Tator sitting in the White House press.
Speaker 5: It would be back to the quote that I threw
Speaker 5: out last last time, the most entertaining outcome is the
Speaker 5: likeliest outcome. So yeah, I mean, we're probably going to
Speaker 5: see a point in time where Donald Trump is giving
Speaker 5: press conferences and the Tape Brothers one of them is
Speaker 5: in a full three piece suit, the other one is
Speaker 5: shirtless and tiny shorts, and they're just asking ob two's questions.
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm here for that future. I enjoy that future.
Speaker 5: It's entertaining.
Speaker 1: I do. I like the the different like flossing attack
Speaker 1: that the Tape Brothers bring, Like Tristan is always dressed
Speaker 1: to the nines and Andrew's always you know, three quarters naked,
Speaker 1: barely dressed it all. Yeah, yeah, it's like such a
Speaker 1: good balance. Anyways, I do want to talk about this
Speaker 1: DeSantis thing. So for those that don't understand or don't
Speaker 1: know the backstory on this, the Tate brothers ran a
Speaker 1: webcam business, and you know, they were accused of human trafficking.
Speaker 1: Despite the fact that I think it was forty of
Speaker 1: their forty five alleged victims came out in their defense,
Speaker 1: so it was like like forty of the girls were like,
Speaker 1: they treated us great, this was all, you know, totally copesthetic.
Speaker 1: But then some of the girls came out and said, no,
Speaker 1: this wasn't. The charges have been pending. They spent approximately
Speaker 1: a year in jail in Romania, but they were never
Speaker 1: actually convicted of anything. So as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: if you can't convict after a year of putting someone
Speaker 1: in jail, you gotta let them go. This is crazy,
Speaker 1: like what are you doing. So despite the fact that
Speaker 1: they really couldn't convict them, they still were on house arrest.
Speaker 1: They weren't allowed to leave Romania. So the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: probably under the guidance of Alina Habba and who or else,
Speaker 1: said use our State Department pressure, which the Biden administration
Speaker 1: could have done at any time, but obviously they didn't
Speaker 1: want to uh to allow the Tape Brothers to travel
Speaker 1: to get them the fuck out of there, so they did.
Speaker 1: And now they're coming back to America. And the reports
Speaker 1: as of late last night or earlier this morning was
Speaker 1: that they were coming to Florida. So Governor Dessentis comes
Speaker 1: out today during a press conference and he says the
Speaker 1: Tate Brothers are not welcome in Florida, And I'm like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,
Speaker 1: these are American citizens. No, you're telling me that they're
Speaker 1: not welcome.
Speaker 2: Agree, I agree, they're American citizens.
Speaker 1: Yes, they're not American cities. Where are they from? What state.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but they're they're fucking Americans.
Speaker 2: Well, the way that I see it is you have
Speaker 2: to do that.
Speaker 5: You have to keep the Tape Brothers out of Florida
Speaker 5: because the future of Florida depends on it.
Speaker 2: You have these two guys.
Speaker 5: I think if you put them in an optimum place
Speaker 5: like Florida, it's tropical, the weather's beautiful.
Speaker 1: Uh, they can do too much damage here.
Speaker 5: The Tate Brothers, if they really wanted to, could take
Speaker 5: over Florida.
Speaker 2: I don't fucking want that.
Speaker 5: You need to send them to Idaho or someplace in
Speaker 5: the northeast or the northwest, rather a flyover state where
Speaker 5: they can't do any damage, where the winter comes and
Speaker 5: it slows down their hustle. Because if you put them
Speaker 5: in a place that's beautiful and they could operate year
Speaker 5: round and they're in a hub, a hub of all
Speaker 5: these other content creators. Next thing, you know, fucking we're
Speaker 5: gonna be the first experiment where instead of having you know,
Speaker 5: an elected governor, we're going to have influencers that are
Speaker 5: running a state, and Florida's going to become a Petri
Speaker 5: dish and an experimentation for that model. I don't want it,
Speaker 5: So yeah, i'd say keep them out. I'm with the Santis.
Speaker 5: I don't want to have to compete with the Tape Brothers.
Speaker 1: Okay, I think half of that's in jest, but I'm
Speaker 1: not really sure with you ever. I think that unless
Speaker 1: you are convicted of something, I mean, even if you
Speaker 1: are convicted to something like, you can't you can't tell
Speaker 1: the Tape Brothers that they're not allowed to be in Florida.
Speaker 2: Like you're the government with that fucking attitude.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm just saying. I'm just saying, like, if so,
Speaker 1: what if the governor of New York, if Kathy Hawkle
Speaker 1: just came out and she said Donald Trump's not welcome in.
Speaker 5: New York she did say that, Yeah, well, fuck New York.
Speaker 5: New York's a terrible place. I'm basing this off of
Speaker 5: Florida being a virtual paradise, right, Yeah, somebody Jews.
Speaker 1: Here, all right, Well, if you're going to bring up
Speaker 1: the Jews, then I'm going to bring up this because
Speaker 1: I am of the opinion that the reason that DeSantis
Speaker 1: is coming out and railing against the Tape Brothers has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with the allegations about you know, trafficking
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. I think it's because they have
Speaker 1: been two of the loudest voices in support of Palestine
Speaker 1: and in opposition to Israel over the past two years
Speaker 1: since this war has been going on. Can I prove that. No,
Speaker 1: But it just strikes me that why why would the
Speaker 1: governor of Florida come out and say this, you know,
Speaker 1: day one, right, like you they've not been convicted of anything,
Speaker 1: but you're saying they're not welcome in Florida like that.
Speaker 1: This is crazy.
Speaker 6: There's such cultural movers and I so here's the thing.
Speaker 6: There's a couple of ways you can go with it, right.
Speaker 6: So the first way is their actions are detestable and
Speaker 6: this is crazy coming on the eve of the Epstein releases, right,
Speaker 6: which is actually kind of serendipitous and hilarious.
Speaker 1: It's almost like wild.
Speaker 6: Yeah, it's almost like Q has a plan and they're
Speaker 6: just unrolling these things. But like whatever, So that's happening,
Speaker 6: but that I don't think that that works. The idea
Speaker 6: of Palestine might work as well, but where we visit that,
Speaker 6: I think it's interesting that he would say he doesn't
Speaker 6: want them here because he understands how much of a
Speaker 6: cultural movement. They are and Florida's what Florida is or was.
Speaker 6: I'm not sure if it still is or what it
Speaker 6: aims to be. Is this like Christian conservative state and
Speaker 6: where I'm from, the in central Florida here if you
Speaker 6: talk to the locals and there's still some of them
Speaker 6: living here where they have family for like generations and
Speaker 6: their name is on their farms and shit like that,
Speaker 6: or sometimes they're all from displace. They're like good old
Speaker 6: boys and they're actually what I think Florida is or
Speaker 6: was on what they want it to be. Andrew Tate
Speaker 6: is not. And this is one of the problems that
Speaker 6: I do have with Andrew Tate. I enjoy him immensely
Speaker 6: as like a comedian when we do comedy, I guess
Speaker 6: I just call myself a comedian or whatever. I really
Speaker 6: I get what he's doing and I really like it.
Speaker 6: But then on a cultural level where he's leading, I
Speaker 6: see what he's doing, I see how effective he is,
Speaker 6: and that's why I like will talk shit against him
Speaker 6: because I don't particularly like the direction that he's that
Speaker 6: he's pushing in.
Speaker 1: It's no I can appreciate that. I don't don't. I
Speaker 1: don't appreciate, you know, the Tape Brothers cultural advice, per se.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, these men haven't been convicted of anything either,
Speaker 1: Governor of Florida. Just so you know, I looked it up.
Speaker 1: Andrew was born in Washington, d c. In nineteen eighty six.
Speaker 1: Tristan was born in Chicago in nineteen eighty eight. These
Speaker 1: are fucking absolutely Americans. You cannot say that they're not
Speaker 1: welcoming your fucking in the state. Like if they had
Speaker 1: they been convicted, I wouldn't. I would still find it
Speaker 1: weird that a governor would say, like, oh, you're like,
Speaker 1: say they had been convicted and they served five years
Speaker 1: in prison or whatever, and then they were released. I
Speaker 1: still would find it very strange if a governor of
Speaker 1: a Florida of Florida would say you're not welcome here
Speaker 1: American citizen, like that would be strange enough. If you're
Speaker 1: not convicted, well, then you absolutely can't say that an
Speaker 1: American citizen isn't welcome in your state. This is fucking madness.
Speaker 6: So here's this is like the duality of my brain.
Speaker 6: I absolutely understand why he would say this. Listen, if
Speaker 6: it's a Palestine thing, that's one thing. If it's a
Speaker 6: but I'm trying not to look at the jew stuff
Speaker 6: all the time. This way, well we're only left to speculate.
Speaker 6: So yeah, so let's speculate on the cultural aspect. If
Speaker 6: he's trying to build a certain type of Florida. Okay,
Speaker 6: but hold on, hold on, let me I know the
Speaker 6: point that you're making. I'm saying this, if you want
Speaker 6: to fucking try and get rid of the cultural framework
Speaker 6: that the Tates might prescribe, well then you have to
Speaker 6: deport half a fuck in Miami because half of my
Speaker 6: is living exactly like the Tape Brothers. Yeah, but we're
Speaker 6: not doing shirtless fucking what. But they're not doing it
Speaker 6: with a larger platform than I am as the governor
Speaker 6: of Florida and probably like one of the most influential
Speaker 6: governors in the United States for the last fifty years.
Speaker 6: Like Dessantas was that guy, like, don't forget during COVID
Speaker 6: he was that dude.
Speaker 1: He was that dude enough.
Speaker 6: To like get away walking around with those pointy white boots.
Speaker 5: Although I do think that was kind of his fucking
Speaker 5: achilles heel. That was what it was, a slow poison,
Speaker 5: the boots.
Speaker 6: It was a slow poison, but still he could he
Speaker 6: could get away with it for what he did for
Speaker 6: the state and who he was at the time.
Speaker 1: Dude, I just remembered something that's really important. I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure it was Ashley Saint Clair that that broke the
Speaker 1: boots story. Motherfucker. I'm pretty sure she's going to posted it.
Speaker 1: I have to. Like, just as you were saying that,
Speaker 1: I was like, I'm pretty sure it was her that
Speaker 1: was like going to war with DeSantis over his poots.
Speaker 5: Right, She's an Israeli op Right, She's got a sod agent.
Speaker 5: And basically what they did was they shamed him and
Speaker 5: embarrassed him and threatened him. Is his you know which,
Speaker 5: favorability among the people. Now he's towing the line.
Speaker 6: And that's what kind of makes me think that this
Speaker 6: is not about their support for Palestine, the at least
Speaker 6: the Dysantis opposition, because on the other side, I'm gonna
Speaker 6: play this is the Toad narrative where because one person
Speaker 6: says something, then the other person is right. So I'll
Speaker 6: just I'll be Toad for a second. You have a
Speaker 6: Laura Lumer and apparently Ashley Saint Clair. A lot of
Speaker 6: these people were very anti Deysantis, but they are taking
Speaker 6: the stance that Deysantis is horrible for saying that they're
Speaker 6: not welcome in Florida, where it's it's bizarre, right, So
Speaker 6: if the Tates hold this pro Palestine ideology, wouldn't they
Speaker 6: be more offended by that rather than the fact that
Speaker 6: Dysantis is saying they can't they can't come here. And
Speaker 6: I do fully support him saying that, well, because he
Speaker 6: can't do it. Number one, he can't do it. You
Speaker 6: can't make them not come here, but you can voice
Speaker 6: your opinion and say this is not the place for you.
Speaker 6: I'm totally fine with He's just.
Speaker 1: To make my case if you wouldn't mind pulling up
Speaker 1: the Jeremy Boring tweet that I dropped in the in
Speaker 1: the chat, you know, progenitor of the Daily Wire. Let's
Speaker 1: hear what he has to say. Because Laura Lumer actually
Speaker 1: came out she was the one going hard in the
Speaker 1: paint against Ashley with the whole Elon thing and saying
Speaker 1: that this was about damaging the Trump administration. This is
Speaker 1: what Jeremy Boring has to say about it. He says,
Speaker 1: the way conservatives and conservative organizations respond to Andrew Tate
Speaker 1: arriving on you as soil will tell you everything you
Speaker 1: need to know about them. Any organization or host who
Speaker 1: embraces him is engaged in far worse than simple grift.
Speaker 1: Though it is that Andrew Tate is the enemy of
Speaker 1: any traditional American conservatism. And then scroll down to what
Speaker 1: hold on? Scroll down to what Elijah posts or no,
Speaker 1: excuse me, Jeremy from the Quartering he says, is this conservative?
Speaker 1: And then click click click it. He says, Hey guys,
Speaker 1: so no homo, but I'm marrying this dude. And Jeremy
Speaker 1: Boring responds, congratulation, fellas, may your lives be happy and edifye.
Speaker 1: So do you think that he's actually interested in in
Speaker 1: like strict old school conservative values or is he really
Speaker 1: not fun of the tapes for some other reason? You, guys,
Speaker 1: are the third option? You're not. These are the same people.
Speaker 6: These are the same people that are you know that
Speaker 6: all congratulated Ashley Saint Clair on her out of wedlock baby,
Speaker 6: out of wedlock IVF baby.
Speaker 1: But what's the third option, David? I'd love to hear it.
Speaker 5: You gave us the toad option. Nobody asked for that.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna give you the nobody ever who to fuck
Speaker 5: asked for the toad option. I don't know, so, so
Speaker 5: I'm gonna give you the conspiratorial uh uh pov and
Speaker 5: and that would be they're manufacturing a striysand effect.
Speaker 2: Uh you you the.
Speaker 5: Same thing that I suspect about Trump, which is where
Speaker 5: you you you wrongly persecute him in the public eye.
Speaker 5: Anybody with eyes to see who's a critical thinker will
Speaker 5: see that this man is being fucked with, and his
Speaker 5: entire administration is being subverted in one way or another
Speaker 5: with paper thin allegations that, given enough time, will fall apart.
Speaker 5: You're only popularizing the message of the Tape brothers if
Speaker 5: you take a hard stance against them. I anticipate that
Speaker 5: this stance will fall away and be meaningless in enough time.
Speaker 5: But what it will do is give them street cred
Speaker 5: for lack of a better term, and it'll embolden their
Speaker 5: base they have in Florida now. And so I look
Speaker 5: at this through the lens of there's a high probability
Speaker 5: that this is some form of theater, one way or another.
Speaker 5: And I know that that the implications of that are huge,
Speaker 5: because how many people are part of this. You know, theater,
Speaker 5: this machine that's going. But I just think that that
Speaker 5: is an angle that's worth exploring here. Even if it's
Speaker 5: not true that that's the intention, what is likely true
Speaker 5: is that'll be the outcome.
Speaker 1: Well, I just don't I just don't think you need
Speaker 1: to strive and affect the Tape Brothers into the limelight.
Speaker 1: Like these dudes are in the limelight. They have, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they have tremendous charisma and you know, rabid audience that
Speaker 1: wants to hear what they have to say. I just
Speaker 1: don't think you have to do this, And honestly, I
Speaker 1: think that it's it's a mistake. Like if you want to, like,
Speaker 1: if you want to relegate them into obscurity, like the
Speaker 1: best thing you can could do is try and try
Speaker 1: and downplay this. Be like yes, you know, despite like
Speaker 1: if I was dysantis, you know, if I want to
Speaker 1: virtue signal, like get up there and I say, look,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that I don't like some of the
Speaker 1: things that the Tape Brothers have to say. They're American
Speaker 1: citizens and they weren't convicted of anything, and they were
Speaker 1: held without trial for you know, over a year, and
Speaker 1: I think that that's totally unjust and you know, as
Speaker 1: someone who believes in the Bill of Rights and do process. Hey, DeSantis,
Speaker 1: the guy who wanted to be the president of the
Speaker 1: fucking United States. I'm they're still obviously welcomed wherever in America.
Speaker 1: This is, This is America, these are Americans. This is absurd, Like,
Speaker 1: that's the fucking actual right answer. The fact that he
Speaker 1: doesn't give that answer tells you that there's an incentive
Speaker 1: structure that is something different. My personal opinion is that
Speaker 1: he's got a tremendous amount of dotors that are Israeli.
Speaker 5: Well, he's had a real fall from grace since the lockdowns,
Speaker 5: because that was what championed him was how well Florida
Speaker 5: handled the lockdowns in comparison to other states.
Speaker 1: And what did he do? He up held the fucking
Speaker 1: Bill of Rights and our ability to be free when
Speaker 1: no other governor was willing, or very few other governors
Speaker 1: were willing. So now what is this? This is totally
Speaker 1: counter to who he was in twenty twenty. There's a
Speaker 1: shift here and it's meaningful, that's all I'm saying.
Speaker 6: Yes, well again, so it's like I do want I
Speaker 6: look forward to the Tate Brothers coming to Florida. I
Speaker 6: mean if they decide to still come here after he
Speaker 6: said that. I think that when we do have our
Speaker 6: in person studio will eventually have the get to the
Speaker 6: point where they will be in studio with this, and
Speaker 6: I'll be able to look at Andrew Tate and I
Speaker 6: and say, I think you're a faggot, but I.
Speaker 1: Really enjoy you.
Speaker 6: But I also enjoy the fact that Desandis does say
Speaker 6: this stuff. Like again, whether he's told to or not,
Speaker 6: it's not really the point for me. And I know
Speaker 6: people are calling me stupid in the chat.
Speaker 1: It's fine.
Speaker 6: I want the Tate brothers to actually be in Florida.
Speaker 6: I think it's a hilarious thing. I think it's a
Speaker 6: very entertaining option. But I like telling people that you
Speaker 6: are not welcome here. I'd like to tell most of
Speaker 6: my family that moved to Florida, you're not welcome here.
Speaker 1: Because now I understand why you like what the says
Speaker 1: is doing. You want this to be an exclusionary state. No,
Speaker 1: I get it.
Speaker 6: I like the I like the rhetoric for what it is.
Speaker 6: Like Donald Trump's first term, he didn't do any of
Speaker 6: the things he's doing. Now he's making me a little
Speaker 6: nervous with like because he's just fucking moving and shaking
Speaker 6: right now.
Speaker 1: But I liked when he said these things.
Speaker 6: Like they get out of here, We're going to build
Speaker 6: a wall, and you don't have to build a wall.
Speaker 6: But the people stop can They stopped coming in, They
Speaker 6: stopped trying to come in because of your rhetoric, And
Speaker 6: that's the most important thing in my opinion. So I
Speaker 6: see what he's doing here, and I like that, But
Speaker 6: I also want to say, maybe we could just take
Speaker 6: let's take a departure from this global or at least
Speaker 6: the American stage and the andrew Tates of the world.
Speaker 6: The reason that this question was asked is because he
Speaker 6: was doing a press conference. I believe he might have
Speaker 6: even been in Ocala, not too far from where I'm at,
Speaker 6: and it was the main the main uh. The main
Speaker 6: point of this press conference was discussing the elimination of
Speaker 6: property tax in Florida. And he's going to implement a
Speaker 6: DOGE team in in Florida, in the state of Florida
Speaker 6: to go in, I guess investigate these uh like the
Speaker 6: counties and the smaller governments that operate within it. And
Speaker 6: he's going to see where the waste is and see
Speaker 6: what's actually going on, because there has been like you know,
Speaker 6: they they almost fucking doubled my property tax. They did
Speaker 6: the same thing to David. It's getting out of control,
Speaker 6: and this is this is extremely American, extremely constitutional. I
Speaker 6: have like that's why I have a hard time like
Speaker 6: putting this, like putting DeSantis in this box when he's
Speaker 6: he's saying, hey, did you buy it?
Speaker 1: Did you buy property? Do you own it? And he's like, no,
Speaker 1: you don't own it because you pay. Look, I'm one
Speaker 1: hundred percent on board with you. Obviously, property taxes ought
Speaker 1: to be abolished. However, DeSantis, when he was running for president,
Speaker 1: he was asked about, you know, military issues, and he
Speaker 1: was saying basically, he was like, look, we're not going
Speaker 1: to go to war with Iran. And then his campaign
Speaker 1: advisor called him up, like they or not. His campaign advisor,
Speaker 1: his top donor Israeli, reaches out to him and says, yeah,
Speaker 1: shut the fuck up about that. And the next day
Speaker 1: he comes out and he can't answer the question straight
Speaker 1: ever again and it totally sunk his campaign. So that's
Speaker 1: one example. He's also passed hate speech laws that are
Speaker 1: particularly targeted towards anti Semitism in the state of Florida.
Speaker 1: There is a long track record of him doing things
Speaker 1: that are great when it comes to freedom, and then
Speaker 1: forgetting about freedom entirely and the Bill of Rights entirely
Speaker 1: when it comes to Israeli or Jewish issues. I find
Speaker 1: this fascinating that I'm the one arguing Israeli influence and
Speaker 1: you two are pushing back against me. This is a
Speaker 1: fantastic flip of things. But I think I'm right here.
Speaker 1: I think that he is clearly he behaves in alignment
Speaker 1: with his values all of the time except for this
Speaker 1: one time, and that one time is always the same thing.
Speaker 5: When I said to that there was the conspiracy angle here,
Speaker 5: that's just a third angle to consider. But I will
Speaker 5: yield ground in the sense that if we are open
Speaker 5: to speculation and we have this limited information that we're
Speaker 5: dealing with, I would lean towards Yeah, it's got some
Speaker 5: sort of Israeli influence going on. So so I agree
Speaker 5: with you, Clint, but it's we're just left with a
Speaker 5: little information. We're judging a guy based off of his
Speaker 5: infrequent departures from his convictions, and that's kind of what
Speaker 5: we have to go on in order to judge him,
Speaker 5: which is fair.
Speaker 1: And he never departs other than then, right, Like that's wild.
Speaker 6: Yeah, well neither does Laura Lumer. I mean her her
Speaker 6: first priority is obviously Israel. But it's just like when
Speaker 6: it comes to the same when it comes to the
Speaker 6: Tape Brothers, like that's I guess maybe this story is
Speaker 6: more about the Tape Brothers and their ability to troll
Speaker 6: and be these characters, whether.
Speaker 1: They actually are or not. You also have to understand
Speaker 1: the other angle for Lumer. First off, Laura Lumer absolutely
Speaker 1: avisrated Ashley Saint Clair when it came to the Elon
Speaker 1: and the Trump thing. She is right or die. You
Speaker 1: said her priority is Israel. Disagree, her priority is Trump.
Speaker 1: She will she is writer or die for Trump, above
Speaker 1: and beyond Israel or America for that matter, Like all
Speaker 1: she cares about is Trump. So the fact that she
Speaker 1: came out and said that did not surprise me. The
Speaker 1: fact that she's defending the tape. She also has another
Speaker 1: incentive structure. Her show is on Rumble. The Tape Brothers
Speaker 1: have been on Rumble, so you know, like I'm but
Speaker 1: also I think that Laura Lumer does function from a
Speaker 1: place of principle that's above and beyond, you know, prioritizing
Speaker 1: israel I. Don't think that she is, you know, this
Speaker 1: Zionist thing that a lot of people have portrayed her
Speaker 1: to be. She does come out, Oh sorry, someone's doing
Speaker 1: handyman work above my head. She does come out and
Speaker 1: say with the Saint Clair, she was she was insinuating
Speaker 1: very strongly that the entire operation for the Saint Clair
Speaker 1: disclosure was Israeli led. Like she she came out with
Speaker 1: that news. I was shocked by it, but it just
Speaker 1: happened a week ago. She did that.
Speaker 5: Well, if it's any if it's meaningful with all my
Speaker 5: I'm team Laura Lumer over team, actually saying if I
Speaker 5: had to choose, if I had to choose my fighter,
Speaker 5: you don't I would choose Lumoor.
Speaker 1: No, we don't have to. But for the record, I
Speaker 1: like both of them, which puts me in a really
Speaker 1: weird position. But whatever.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, I don't know where this where this all goes,
Speaker 5: but I think to me, it's safe to say the
Speaker 5: Tates are going to end up in Florida if they
Speaker 5: if they really want to be here. I don't think
Speaker 5: you can keep people out, so uh, you know, to me,
Speaker 5: right now, this is a point of contention. But how
Speaker 5: long this is actually going to stay a point of
Speaker 5: contention or if he's got any legs to stand on
Speaker 5: to actually keep them out?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. All right, hold them, We're done
Speaker 1: with the Tates. I'd say that they're welcome on dangerous
Speaker 1: retards any time we would have a show with them.
Speaker 5: If we did that, we'd all have to do it
Speaker 5: shirtless in tiny shorts, which I'm like that.
Speaker 1: I'm very enthusiastic about that.
Speaker 6: Actually, yeah, so Clint, there's some I guess Elon Musk
Speaker 6: is in the news again because he is the news.
Speaker 6: What's going on with him versus Doge? Elms the CIA
Speaker 6: versus Douge. Ah, that's right, No, No, that's right, that's
Speaker 6: what it is. Yeah, yeah, we want to run that
Speaker 6: clip up.
Speaker 1: Let's play that. Yeah, Okay, here we go. Jesse Water
Speaker 1: is my favorite person.
Speaker 7: But Intel doesn't like being told what to do. When
Speaker 7: they saw Musk with the chainsaw, dojing Foreign Aid, they
Speaker 7: started leaking to CNN. If you doze us, there will
Speaker 7: be consequences. On the CIA's seventh floor, home to top leadership,
Speaker 7: some officers are also quietly discussing how mass firings in
Speaker 7: the buyouts already offered to staff risk creating a group
Speaker 7: of disgruntled former employees who might be motivated to take
Speaker 7: what they know to a foreign intelligent service. The CIA
Speaker 7: is telling CNN that if their funding gets cut, they're
Speaker 7: going to sell state secrets to Russia.
Speaker 1: Who the hell hired.
Speaker 7: These Benedict Arnold's the CIA is supposed to be filled
Speaker 7: with patriots, not sellouts.
Speaker 1: I have good too. I love conservatives who are actually
Speaker 1: there's ten more seconds go for.
Speaker 7: Michael Schallenberger's reporting. A source inside the FBI says the
Speaker 7: bureau is destroying evidence. Now we know what their accomplishments
Speaker 7: were last week. Dear Elon, I wipe the servers cleaner
Speaker 7: than crooked.
Speaker 1: This is what I love about conservatives, even when all
Speaker 1: of the evidence, uh like, shatters your entire mythology that
Speaker 1: the three letter agencies are you know, filled with great
Speaker 1: patriotic people that defend you, like like you, you know
Speaker 1: that the FBI tried to frame your Jesus Donald Trump
Speaker 1: for treason, and you still go, WHOA wait, if we
Speaker 1: fire these CIA agents, they might become literal traders and
Speaker 1: go and sell, you know, secret information to enemy intell agencies.
Speaker 1: It's like, just drop the entire narrative, drop the veneer
Speaker 1: that you think these are. These are fucking criminal organizations.
Speaker 1: They have clearly demonstrated that. I don't know why conservatives still,
Speaker 1: like you still think it's reformable. You think, oh, now
Speaker 1: that Cash Betel and Dan Bongino in charge, that every
Speaker 1: other FBI agent, the all the ten thousand other FBI
Speaker 1: agents that are in there, suddenly are good guys. Now, Like,
Speaker 1: what are you talking about? Oh, that's why I don't
Speaker 1: fuck with these people. That's why. Yeah, me too.
Speaker 5: I mean, we're talking this whole situation where you had
Speaker 5: you know, I'm not Operation Mockingbird right, where the intelligence
Speaker 5: agencies are in bed with the news media organizations. They're
Speaker 5: repeating the same narratives ad nauseum to you know, siop
Speaker 5: the people. It's part of the big propaganda machine. And
Speaker 5: this is the same CNN, by the way, who they're communicating.
Speaker 5: That's what he said, right, that the CIA is telling
Speaker 5: CNN this that they are going to potentially leak information
Speaker 5: to foreign bodies.
Speaker 2: Is that what they're saying.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was an unnamed source so we don't
Speaker 1: know who's talking.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean these are all the same. So CNN
Speaker 5: is in bed with these intelligence agencies. If you remember,
Speaker 5: we started the show talking about the Epstein thing. If
Speaker 5: you remember back in twenty twenty, I believe there was
Speaker 5: a great big revelation that CNN, the owner of it,
Speaker 5: had squashed the story or squashed the story I don't
Speaker 5: know which one's a fucking right terminology, that one of
Speaker 5: the reporters from CNN was working on to break open
Speaker 5: the Epstein case. This was back in like twenty sixteen.
Speaker 5: All these people that could have been saved had we
Speaker 5: been talking about Epstein in this island ahead of time,
Speaker 5: and given the relationships ABC News was it I think
Speaker 5: it was CNN.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure it was. It wasn't CNN. Well either way,
Speaker 1: the ABC newscaster fucking years ago and they acted it. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So I mean what's clear to me is it
Speaker 5: doesn't matter if it's CNN, ABC, MSNBC. These legacy media
Speaker 5: institutions are in bed with these intelligence operations. That's why
Speaker 5: you get an Operation Mockingbird, and so you know, it's
Speaker 5: been an unholy union this entire time. So yeah, just
Speaker 5: to your point Clint to stand here and that's your take.
Speaker 1: Is like what happened?
Speaker 5: These people are supposed to be American heroes, Like that
Speaker 5: fucking narrative went to bed.
Speaker 2: You know, probably deck ago.
Speaker 5: We've been dealing with the knowledge that they're insanely corrupt
Speaker 5: for a long time. So yeah, it's just a matter
Speaker 5: of too little, too late, right, It's it's it seems
Speaker 5: like more agitation propaganda to me, like he's playing to
Speaker 5: this boomer crowd, who I guess is still alive. And
Speaker 5: I can't What I really can't understand, Clint, is why
Speaker 5: you're not aiming your show in this direction and what
Speaker 5: you do because.
Speaker 1: Clearly because I tell the truth, top.
Speaker 6: I know, but you don't make any money. Where is
Speaker 6: the money?
Speaker 5: Money?
Speaker 1: In truth, this is what apparently money, the money the
Speaker 1: money comes. Here's here's the issue that you and I have.
Speaker 1: You have a high time prefer preference. I have low
Speaker 1: time preference. I believe that that was raised. Well, he's
Speaker 1: behaving in a racist fashion so or in alignment with
Speaker 1: what a racist might say about a Puerto Rican. Anyways,
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is I will build my audience stuff
Speaker 1: of my track record of being consistently honest with them
Speaker 1: for years and years and years. You can go short term.
Speaker 1: You can you can be the Mount Wallace's of the
Speaker 1: world and come out and just put click big garbage,
Speaker 1: conspiracy nonsense and and have people and get up to
Speaker 1: a million fucking followers on X. I could grow my
Speaker 1: ex a lot faster if I was just a lying
Speaker 1: piece of shit. I'm not interested in that. I'm interested
Speaker 1: in growing slowly and having a real like Ron Paully
Speaker 1: in the legacy of not to put myself in that camp,
Speaker 1: but like, like, that's the whole reason Ron Paul's special, right,
Speaker 1: he was right, and he told the truth for fucking
Speaker 1: decades and decades did he did he see much you know,
Speaker 1: fame and glory until he was in his sixties, seventies, eighties, nineties, Like, no,
Speaker 1: he didn't. But I'm not interested in the short term
Speaker 1: em fesing. That's fair.
Speaker 6: It just seems like, yeah, it seems like that's where
Speaker 6: the audience is at Clinton. It seems like this is
Speaker 6: why we're not gonna be able to grow as quickly
Speaker 6: as we should.
Speaker 1: But that's full. Look, this is this is why we're
Speaker 1: the perfect trio. Is that you guys get to lie
Speaker 1: and I get to tell the truth, and I still
Speaker 1: get to grow based off of your lives. So this
Speaker 1: is perfect, perfect balance. You know.
Speaker 5: It's just it's weird to be sitting in this time
Speaker 5: now where we are that or the record.
Speaker 1: Despite the fact that I've been telling the truth consistently,
Speaker 1: I still have grown faster than you, Top, So fuck you.
Speaker 1: Huh how about that, Top Lobstack. I just started.
Speaker 6: Okay, I guess we're in the part of the show
Speaker 6: where we're going to talk about our person like our
Speaker 6: personal shit.
Speaker 1: I just started trying. You brought it up.
Speaker 6: I literally just started trying and just started lying to
Speaker 6: the people and try. And I wasn't even trying. I
Speaker 6: was watching you try for five years.
Speaker 1: Clinton. You got to two hundred thousand.
Speaker 6: So now I started trying just like maybe a year ago,
Speaker 6: and I'm a quarter of the way there.
Speaker 1: So we will see. We will see.
Speaker 6: My metrics are outpacing yours by.
Speaker 2: The looks the question though. All right, we start this show.
Speaker 5: This is the third episode of this show, and I'm
Speaker 5: not saying that we should deviate from this method, but
Speaker 5: we open up typically with a clip. I mean, the
Speaker 5: first time it was a black lady threatened the stab
Speaker 5: a guy if he didn't eat a pussy or something
Speaker 5: like that.
Speaker 1: And that's maybe not part of a theme.
Speaker 5: That we've got going on, the theme that we now
Speaker 5: have going out, we open up with Fox News or
Speaker 5: or whatever, and obviously it's relevant to the conversation, but
Speaker 5: that word right relevant, It's like, why the fuck are
Speaker 5: we still even looking at these people, these people who
Speaker 5: have who have uh missed the mark to the detriment
Speaker 5: of the entire country. It doesn't matter if it's Fox
Speaker 5: News and it's Republican or if it's CNN and it's
Speaker 5: just democrat. This legacy media model that we all recognize
Speaker 5: as dying. Anybody that runs in our circles, if you
Speaker 5: have a conversation with them, it's like, yeah, the legacy
Speaker 5: media is dying. And to our point before where now
Speaker 5: they're handing out press passes to you know, content creators.
Speaker 5: Even the administration realizes that, and we're all so it's like,
Speaker 5: it's it's kind of insane to even scoff at a
Speaker 5: bad take, right, the bad take being.
Speaker 1: Oh, I thought these people were American heroes.
Speaker 5: It's like, what the fuck are all the money and
Speaker 5: all the studio decor and all the expensive equipment, and
Speaker 5: it all fucking means nothing. These people have lied to us,
Speaker 5: They've missed the mark. And even if they haven't lied
Speaker 5: to us, they've lied by omission.
Speaker 1: This is my point, though, This is why I don't
Speaker 1: take the path that Top is offering me. The whole
Speaker 1: reason that those people are in that that fancy studio
Speaker 1: is because they professionally lie to you. They pretend as
Speaker 1: if they're telling you the truth. This this, you know,
Speaker 1: this unspeakable truth, because he's willing to tell the story
Speaker 1: that ABC News isn't able to tell. But he's still
Speaker 1: not able to tell the story that I'm able to tell,
Speaker 1: and I'm able to actually tell the truth when I
Speaker 1: don't have a producer saying, hey, kill this story. We
Speaker 1: can't talk about this now. So that's the whole reason
Speaker 1: that Rogan's is as big as he is too. So
Speaker 1: the entire paradigm of lying to people to grow is
Speaker 1: just wrong and inverted. But let me let me play
Speaker 1: you this clip, because this is this is what we
Speaker 1: were talking about, and I was correct that it was
Speaker 1: ABC News. Here you go.
Speaker 2: I've had the story for three years.
Speaker 5: I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know what it was.
Speaker 5: My misremembering was that Disney owns CNN and ABC and
Speaker 5: that's the parent company.
Speaker 1: Gotcha, So that's how they're connected.
Speaker 3: Shit pictures.
Speaker 2: She hit everything. He wasn't hiding for twelve years.
Speaker 1: When convinced her to come out. I tried for three
Speaker 1: years to get.
Speaker 4: It on to no avail, and now it's all coming out,
Speaker 4: and it's like these new relevve revelations there you.
Speaker 2: Go, yeh, so hey, by the way, what the fuck?
Speaker 1: I mean?
Speaker 2: I know Project Veritas fell apart.
Speaker 5: For the time that Project Veritas was operating, there was
Speaker 5: some of the most amazing revelations that methodology of like
Speaker 5: sending a hot chick to catfish some moron who works
Speaker 5: at CNN to disseminate secrets about this or that, or
Speaker 5: some employee over at Pfizer.
Speaker 2: That was really a heyday.
Speaker 5: I know they had a falling out James O'Keeffe and
Speaker 5: you know, the other creative people at Project Veritas, and
Speaker 5: not a falling out. I mean, it seems like they
Speaker 5: kind of fucked him over far, but he switched kind
Speaker 5: of lanes and then that's I didn't hear anything about
Speaker 5: it anymore.
Speaker 1: Oh, no, he still does it. I mean, they just
Speaker 1: had a bunch of big disclosures over the past six months,
Speaker 1: and it seems like they're new angle. I guess it's
Speaker 1: not new, but it's just kind of a you know, reorientation,
Speaker 1: sexual orientation. Almost all of the stings are just with
Speaker 1: gay dudes. It's always it's always gay dudes on first
Speaker 1: dates and they just get them liquored up, and the
Speaker 1: gay dudes are just like, yeah, you know, I have
Speaker 1: you know, super secret, top top secret clearance, but you
Speaker 1: give me one more wine. I'm about to tell you
Speaker 1: about where we keep our nuclear codes. Like these dudes
Speaker 1: don't keep any cigarets at it.
Speaker 6: It's funny that it's always been like the blackmail has
Speaker 6: always been through the gay people, whether it's like, you know,
Speaker 6: before they were allowed to be openly gay, this is
Speaker 6: this was the blackmail, and they would get them to
Speaker 6: do whatever they wanted because they had them, you know,
Speaker 6: in pictures of women's lingerie.
Speaker 1: And now it's the thing, it's just now ascuity. But
Speaker 1: now it's it's funny because like you won't you don't
Speaker 1: have to hide the fact that you're gay. But now
Speaker 1: they just tell the secrets like now, because they don't
Speaker 1: have to keep the secret about being gay, they can't
Speaker 1: keep any any secrets at all, just say everything.
Speaker 5: Hey, by the way, guys, it looks like they did
Speaker 5: release Epstein files phase one, and from the sentiment that
Speaker 5: I'm seeing on Twitter here heavily redacted, which we expected
Speaker 5: to be the case. So I don't know if those
Speaker 5: reactions will fade away as we move into phase two
Speaker 5: and three, or I don't fucking know how many phases
Speaker 5: we're gonna get. But it has happened, so there is
Speaker 5: movement on that front. In a realm where it's safe
Speaker 5: to bet on nothing at all happening. It's nice when,
Speaker 5: like at least a little something takes place.
Speaker 1: If any of the viewers have an opportunity to dig
Speaker 1: through this, because we can't do it right now. If
Speaker 1: you have any you know, smoking guns or big news,
Speaker 1: please do reply to us so that we can talk
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 5: It's exciting, though, man, I mean, I hope it does
Speaker 5: come to fruition.
Speaker 1: I hope we do.
Speaker 5: I think that this is gonna be the domino, the
Speaker 5: first domino to kick off a series of events that
Speaker 5: I've kind of been predicting for some time. Now, yeah,
Speaker 5: I saw this. This was actually posted by.
Speaker 1: D C Draino. There, dude, that dude's an op. I
Speaker 1: just got to say it. Every time, every time Thomas
Speaker 1: Massey acts on his principles and he votes against one
Speaker 1: of these insane spending bills, DC Draino runs a campaign
Speaker 1: to try and get him throwing that office every single
Speaker 1: fucking time. I think he's And by the way, there
Speaker 1: was disclosures I think it was six six or seven
Speaker 1: months ago something like that that he was taking money
Speaker 1: to push legislation. So this guy is a literal paid operative.
Speaker 1: So the fact that he comes out against MASSI every time,
Speaker 1: I'm like, your highlight this.
Speaker 5: MK Ryan says, they're at vault dot FBI dot gov
Speaker 5: slash Jeffrey dash Epstein, and I wonder if you could
Speaker 5: do a keyword search. Usually that's how those things work.
Speaker 5: So even if you can't, I think your own browser
Speaker 5: should enable you to do that. So if you guys
Speaker 5: can do keyword searches, like I don't know, toss in
Speaker 5: some names, right Clinton.
Speaker 6: So here's something that I kind of want to bring
Speaker 6: up to. I know Clint doesn't really care about this,
Speaker 6: but we have the EPSTEIN files that are being released.
Speaker 6: But along with the EPSTEIN files, we're supposed to get
Speaker 6: the JFK files which were released, but not really. Yeah,
Speaker 6: I care about the JFK files. No, No, this next one,
Speaker 6: I'm pretty sure you don't care about. But I think
Speaker 6: this affects everything. I think this affects why we see
Speaker 6: what we see in government. The UFO or UAP files
Speaker 6: are supposed to be disclosed to us because I mean, yeah,
Speaker 6: disclosure has been coming for since nineteen fifty seven, since
Speaker 6: the Roswell hash Roswell crash, and we've been patiently waiting
Speaker 6: as to to find out what is the nature of
Speaker 6: these beings that crash landed or some of them are
Speaker 6: like summoned in. This is I mean, this is what
Speaker 6: people say. So do you care about this at all?
Speaker 6: Do you think that this matters?
Speaker 1: Oh? It matters. I just don't believe it.
Speaker 5: That's the issue for me, Like, what do you suspect
Speaker 5: is going on here? Then this government disclosure that we
Speaker 5: seem to be moving.
Speaker 1: Towards, well, I don't believe that they're going to disclose it,
Speaker 1: like if it is all right? So just like let's
Speaker 1: think this through logically, if it is alien life and
Speaker 1: it's technology that we can't possibly compete with, they're not
Speaker 1: going to tell us that because then there's panic because
Speaker 1: our military can't protect us, and then people go freak
Speaker 1: the fuck out. So they're not going to tell us that.
Speaker 1: If it's if it's top secret technology that our own
Speaker 1: government possesses that is superior to all other military equipment
Speaker 1: on Earth, well they're not going to tell that because
Speaker 1: they don't want our enemies to know that. So if
Speaker 1: it's fucking interdimensional demons is Alex Jones talks about, well,
Speaker 1: they're not going to tell us that because they don't
Speaker 1: want us to believe in the Bible. So why the
Speaker 1: fuck do you expect them to tell us the truth
Speaker 1: on any level?
Speaker 5: No, I don't expect them to tell us the truth
Speaker 5: at all, But I do expect some theatrics. And I
Speaker 5: don't know what I can't claim to know definitively which
Speaker 5: direction they're going to steer the public consensus in with
Speaker 5: this sort of like government sponsored disclosure that seems to
Speaker 5: be happening. I would agree that it's going to be
Speaker 5: deceptive in nature, it's going to be a lie, but
Speaker 5: it it strikes me that we're moving somewhere. I mean,
Speaker 5: we talk about this on Nephelin des Squad. It feels
Speaker 5: like we're at the intersection of a bunch of moments
Speaker 5: all crossing over at once. So the you know, the
Speaker 5: whole QAnon thing, the alien disclosure thing, all that shit
Speaker 5: seems to be in the focal point. I don't know
Speaker 5: that we'll definitively get it. Then you'd have to speculate
Speaker 5: as to why they would pump us and then pull
Speaker 5: it back.
Speaker 1: Well, I'll give you the one. I'll give you the
Speaker 1: one justifiable reason that they might tell us the truth
Speaker 1: scare quotes would be that they say, yes, this is
Speaker 1: alien life forms. They have technology that are slightly slightly
Speaker 1: better than our own. Therefore, we need to invest you know,
Speaker 1: five trillion dollars over the next forty eight months to
Speaker 1: catch up and to be able to defend you guys.
Speaker 1: So they basically are able to turn on the printing
Speaker 1: press full speed. Like that would be the only that's
Speaker 1: the only angle by which I see an incentive for
Speaker 1: the government to tell the truth about this. Beyond that,
Speaker 1: I see none, you know, like a syop project bluebeam,
Speaker 1: Like that's the only that's the only angle that makes
Speaker 1: sense to me. Why they would ever tell us anything.
Speaker 1: You know, what you feel, what it feels like to me,
Speaker 1: and this is this is gonna get real weird and woo.
Speaker 1: But the idea of these aliens and that number one,
Speaker 1: they exists, but number two, they've just been in contact
Speaker 1: with our government for the most part. That is rapidly
Speaker 1: changing because I feel like people are kind of like
Speaker 1: onto this idea that people can actually summon them themselves,
Speaker 1: and there's like case after case of this happening. I
Speaker 1: know you don't.
Speaker 6: This is like kind of like out of your realm clip.
Speaker 6: But the CIA has had operations since like the I
Speaker 6: mean the early fifties or maybe even like the mid
Speaker 6: forties where they're channeling and summoning these entities, specifically a
Speaker 6: man named Inrigia Buharaz who was on the CIA payroll
Speaker 6: for a long time doing all kinds of crazy ass
Speaker 6: experiments summoning these entities that come.
Speaker 1: I mean, you get a different story.
Speaker 6: These entities the same nine will come from the ancient
Speaker 6: Egyptian Niad, or they might come from fifty three million
Speaker 6: light years away, or you know, later on, they might
Speaker 6: be the Greek pantheon or something like that, or the
Speaker 6: you know, they come from Norse mythology. But they're all
Speaker 6: saying the same thing, and thing is interesting. It's all
Speaker 6: like this global global warming climate change cult alarmist stuff
Speaker 6: that has been prevalent in our society for a long time.
Speaker 6: This is what these aliens or entities have been imparting
Speaker 6: on the people that summon them and the government clear narrative, yeah,
Speaker 6: the nuclear narrative as well, but the government has been
Speaker 6: a major proponent in contacting them. The people haven't been.
Speaker 6: And now it's almost like this door has been opened wide.
Speaker 6: And from our perspective, from me FLM. Desqua's perspective perspective,
Speaker 6: we've spoke to a lot of people and we see
Speaker 6: a lot of a lot of confessions or a lot
Speaker 6: of testimony that people are in contact or in league
Speaker 6: with something or other. So this is no longer this
Speaker 6: like closed door thing that only the government can do,
Speaker 6: and it seems like it's just out of their hands.
Speaker 6: And now we're getting we're getting disclosure on everything that
Speaker 6: we've ever wanted. Because it feels like we're moving like
Speaker 6: like the cat out the bag, we're moving into something new.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And I just want to say, Clint, I know
Speaker 5: that you're looking at this as like, what could the
Speaker 5: potential outcome be. Maybe they're trying to, like, I like
Speaker 5: the idea of like justifying more money into like defense
Speaker 5: and things like that too, because oh yeah, obviously that too. Right,
Speaker 5: any good thing doesn't go without being taken advantage of
Speaker 5: and passing a bunch of legislation if.
Speaker 2: At all possible.
Speaker 5: But we're talking about this Epstein thing, and you know,
Speaker 5: there's some sub sect of humanity that has quite a
Speaker 5: grasp on us that is concerned with the ritual sacrifice
Speaker 5: of children and paying homage to various entities like Molock
Speaker 5: and everything.
Speaker 2: These things are not concrete.
Speaker 5: You can't prove it yet, but there's certainly whispers and
Speaker 5: a lot of people suspect that this is the case.
Speaker 5: And if this is the case, then maybe it's worth
Speaker 5: exploring the sort of spiritual ramifications. If there's some sub
Speaker 5: sect of our government that is sacrificing children and engaging
Speaker 5: in dark arts, then maybe there's a spiritual component to
Speaker 5: this sort of disclosure deception that should be taken into consideration.
Speaker 5: And I would say, based off of the information that
Speaker 5: we're gathering and there's not much to do with this, Clint,
Speaker 5: I know, but it looks like they're gearing up to
Speaker 5: deceive us about who we are, how we came to be,
Speaker 5: and who created us. So there can be levels above
Speaker 5: just the nuts and bolts of you know, defense funding
Speaker 5: and things of that nature. And I don't think that
Speaker 5: that's a far cry given the strangeness that the elite
Speaker 5: seem to be partaking in.
Speaker 1: Well, it's all possible. I'm not saying that I know
Speaker 1: anything definitively. I'm just thinking from government incentive structures and
Speaker 1: what disclosures they would make to their benefit. Let me
Speaker 1: also go back to because, as you can tell, I
Speaker 1: approach every issue through kind of a logical rational quibono lens.
Speaker 1: When you talk about how the sightings of UFOs have
Speaker 1: been something that's persisted throughout human existence, I think that
Speaker 1: there's a very you know, probably unpopular amongst your audience,
Speaker 1: but I think a very plausible kind of atheistic explanation
Speaker 1: that before the advent of you know, air travel, a
Speaker 1: civilization that had no concept of a capacity to fly,
Speaker 1: seeing a meteor would come across as like, oh, that's
Speaker 1: a visitor from you know, another land or outer space
Speaker 1: or whatever. So I think that, like that's a totally
Speaker 1: reasonable read for a civilization that didn't understand air travel
Speaker 1: to like see something flying through the air and creating
Speaker 1: their own kind of mythology around it. And it's totally
Speaker 1: logical to me that you would have that same phenomenon
Speaker 1: happening amongst different civilizations and through different epochs of time.
Speaker 1: Like so that that to me doesn't come across as
Speaker 1: like evidence that these UFOs have been with us forever,
Speaker 1: like it could just it could be very easily explained
Speaker 1: by celestial bodies and movements and things of that nature.
Speaker 1: Just a quick example, like I went out to the
Speaker 1: desert I don't know, four or five years ago, and
Speaker 1: very rarely do I get to be in an area
Speaker 1: where there is no city lights, and I'm laying with
Speaker 1: a friend of mine. We were just like partying out
Speaker 1: in the desert and we're just laying there looking at
Speaker 1: the sky. And this was before I really understood how
Speaker 1: many Starlink satellites there were, and out of space desert.
Speaker 1: It was in California. It was a Calvin Joshua. It
Speaker 1: wasn't Joshua Tree. It was east of there. But regardless,
Speaker 1: we're we're staring into outer space and the fucking or
Speaker 1: I don't even know if you guys believe in outer.
Speaker 5: Space anyways, what I think is out of space waters
Speaker 5: above right, the firmament separates the waters above from the
Speaker 5: waters below.
Speaker 1: So I'm I'm an idiot, But I was staring into
Speaker 1: the waters above, right, and and there's fucking there's these
Speaker 1: these lights and like it looks like stars, right. But
Speaker 1: then I realized that these stars are moving very rapidly
Speaker 1: and and they're but they're in a perfect line. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And I had no idea what I was looking at.
Speaker 1: So I'm thinking, I'm kind of freaking out. I'm like,
Speaker 1: what the fuck am I look like? Am I seeing
Speaker 1: a UFO?
Speaker 5: Like?
Speaker 1: That was my initial reaction. And then I got home
Speaker 1: and I researched it a little bit. Well, I thought
Speaker 1: about it while I was there, and I kind of
Speaker 1: came to a more you know, benign explanation than I
Speaker 1: researched it. And I was like, oh, these are starling satellites.
Speaker 1: There's then you can fucking see these things, and there's
Speaker 1: tons of them, and if you're if you're in a
Speaker 1: place you can don't take my word for this. Go
Speaker 1: to a desert where there's no fucking city lights and
Speaker 1: look up into the into space in the middle of
Speaker 1: the night, if there's no clouds, you will see satellites
Speaker 1: all around us, moving around. It's fucking nutty, but it's happening.
Speaker 1: And my point is like, just because I didn't understand it,
Speaker 1: I came to a conclusion that was wrong. So that's
Speaker 1: that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: I saw starlink two outside of my house one night,
Speaker 5: and I fucking I didn't know what the hell I
Speaker 5: was looking at. And I was so pissed off because
Speaker 5: I looked up and I saw it, and I'm watching
Speaker 5: it for a while, and I realized, like, I gotta
Speaker 5: get somebody, So I run in the house to get
Speaker 5: my wife. She's not around. She's in the back, and
Speaker 5: I see my niece and I'm like, get out here,
Speaker 5: and she doesn't fucking care at all about this stuff.
Speaker 5: And I drag that and I had missed it, unfortunately,
Speaker 5: But yeah, seeing seeing starlink is fucking jarring.
Speaker 6: Sure, there's there's a whole nother there's a whole other
Speaker 6: world when we're looking up there and it's it's a
Speaker 6: huge mystery. So we don't know exactly what we're looking at.
Speaker 6: But what I can tell you is this, all right,
Speaker 6: we'll go back to the idea of the Egyptian Iniad.
Speaker 6: There are these nine deities and they represent the Sun,
Speaker 6: the Earth, moon, stars, ship like this, like what you've
Speaker 6: seen all the time. In Greek mythology, there are the
Speaker 6: nine muses, and they loosely represent the same thing. This
Speaker 6: is a different time period, a different part of the earth.
Speaker 6: In Chinese mythology there are the nine dragons. They represent
Speaker 6: the same thing, the Navagara. This is Hindu mythology. Again,
Speaker 6: there are nine of these entities that represent it's like
Speaker 6: the Sun, the moon, Mars, mercury. But it's really their
Speaker 6: characteristics are representing the same thing. Mesoamerican mythology, the nine
Speaker 6: the nine Lords of Night. You can go on and on,
Speaker 6: Norse mythology, just keep on going down whatever mythology and
Speaker 6: whatever time period and whatever culture, and they all reference
Speaker 6: having contact with these entities. Fast forward to nineteen fifty
Speaker 6: with this guy injury japuharich Is he's working with some
Speaker 6: I think it's like some Hindu guy.
Speaker 5: Can I just say you skipped one time frame Alistair Crowley, right,
Speaker 5: would have been before that, just before that, communicating with
Speaker 5: the Council of Nine. So right, go on, yeah, again,
Speaker 5: this is like esoteric ship, but it gets into government
Speaker 5: because this is like completely government funded. In the nineteen fifties,
Speaker 5: he's with this guy Pouharaz is with this dude, doctor
Speaker 5: v Nott. He's an Indian mystic and they are channeling
Speaker 5: whatever just so happened to channel the nine. They're using
Speaker 5: Guiji boards, they're using other techniques, sex, ritual techniques, things
Speaker 5: like this.
Speaker 6: You knows, just the typical way you would channel is
Speaker 6: what they do, and they channel the Nine. They don't
Speaker 6: do it once, they do it for twenty years, twenty years,
Speaker 6: over twenty years, from the nineteen fifties to like nineteen
Speaker 6: seventy four or something like that. They get a Jewish
Speaker 6: guy named Uri Geller who's a he's like one of
Speaker 6: those dudes that Ben's the spoons with Telekinesis. Apparently he
Speaker 6: has these strong psychic powers. They get him to channel
Speaker 6: to nine. This guy's channeling UFOs. A lot of people
Speaker 6: say that what he was doing was like, you know,
Speaker 6: magic tricks and bullshit. A lot of people say that no,
Speaker 6: this is legit. But what I can tell you, is
Speaker 6: what I can ask you, is why is the constant
Speaker 6: these entities that represent the same things. Why do they
Speaker 6: come and tell humanity the same exact message? Why are
Speaker 6: they here today? And why are we kind of carry
Speaker 6: why not kind of Why are we exactly carrying out
Speaker 6: what they want to our own detriment this environmentalism.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're gonna have to educate me. I don't
Speaker 1: know what they want. I don't know what you said.
Speaker 1: This guy does it for twenty years. It sounds like
Speaker 1: that was a much more scientific endeavor as opposed to
Speaker 1: some sort of like you know, mystic ancient mythology explanation.
Speaker 1: What did what did? What did his investigations discover? What
Speaker 1: did he say about it? Since it was not the
Speaker 1: same thing.
Speaker 5: They basically are warning us about basically our our impending
Speaker 5: doom technologically advancing to a point where we could destroy
Speaker 5: our own planet, whether it's through some sort of climate
Speaker 5: catalysm or you know, I agree with that, and then
Speaker 5: also that we have to avoid that, and then they're
Speaker 5: going to help us ascend and take our place amongst
Speaker 5: some sort of fucking galactic federation. It's always the same thing.
Speaker 5: Some ladies in contact with him. Right now, she's going
Speaker 5: viral on Twitter, I mean on TikTok. She's been taking
Speaker 5: notes for the past I think it's been almost fifteen years.
Speaker 5: Her and her husband have been using a Wiji board
Speaker 5: talking to something that identifies itself as seven, and it's
Speaker 5: got the same message. Number seven has the same message, Well,
Speaker 5: we're going to destroy ourselves and.
Speaker 2: Mutually assured nuclear destruction.
Speaker 5: Also, climate change is a big deal, and we just
Speaker 5: need to work with humanity to get over this so
Speaker 5: that we can help you guys, ascend.
Speaker 2: And then you end up looking into it.
Speaker 5: And there's a book out there called the Council of
Speaker 5: Nine or the Council of Saturn, and it's written by seven,
Speaker 5: an anonymous source that claims to be one of the nine.
Speaker 2: But it's just uncanny for generations.
Speaker 1: What are the nine?
Speaker 5: The nine, I would argue, are ancient spiritual beings, more
Speaker 5: than likely fallen angels who have been casted out, and
Speaker 5: they're playing a very long game where they have to
Speaker 5: lie to us about who created us and why and
Speaker 5: also sell us the same lie that the serpent told
Speaker 5: in the garden, which is we can be as God, this.
Speaker 1: Sounds like nephlim shit, doesn't it It is.
Speaker 6: Well, here's the weird part, the weird part of how
Speaker 6: this all kind of ties back, which is why we're
Speaker 6: so onto this, and I feel like most people should
Speaker 6: be looking at this as well. That guy Pouharich, he
Speaker 6: was a He had a CIA funded operation called Operation Stargate.
Speaker 1: Where does that ring a bell?
Speaker 6: And the entire point of this operation is to summon
Speaker 6: entities or aliens. It was it looked on his face,
Speaker 6: it looked a lot like they were looking at UFOs.
Speaker 6: But mainly what they were doing was these channeling practices.
Speaker 1: And this actually ties in really well to what I
Speaker 1: talked about during tagering last night, like the Telepathy tapes.
Speaker 1: You know, I've always believed that human beings do have
Speaker 1: a capacity that like certain human beings have that others don't.
Speaker 1: Like I do believe that some people are more sensitive
Speaker 1: and capable of other things. Anyways, just a quick backstory,
Speaker 1: because the Telepathy Tapes are this incredibly viral podcast series
Speaker 1: that came out I think it was late last year,
Speaker 1: and I'm just getting into it now, so I haven't
Speaker 1: really concluded, but I do know enough at this point
Speaker 1: that The framework is this, there's this investigative series. They
Speaker 1: travel around the world to these families that have these
Speaker 1: non communicative autist children, like severely autistic to the point
Speaker 1: that they've never been able to speak. As a consequence
Speaker 1: of never being able to speak. In my estimation, they've
Speaker 1: developed the additional skill set that people that can speak
Speaker 1: don't develop, and it only works with certain you know,
Speaker 1: family members, like they have to know them intimately. For instance,
Speaker 1: this one child has this capacity to correctly and I
Speaker 1: shit you not. This is all fucking like documented on video.
Speaker 1: It's fucking crazy. They create a random number generator and
Speaker 1: they just have random numbers come up. The mom looks
Speaker 1: at it, the child who can't speak, has a little
Speaker 1: type pad and it types out the right number, and
Speaker 1: it does it twenty times out of twenty times exactly right.
Speaker 1: And this is from one hundred to nine hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety nine. The odds of getting you know, I mean
Speaker 1: twenty times right out of that option set is fucking impossible.
Speaker 1: So unless it was a scam, it looks to be real.
Speaker 1: Then they do this other thing with these multicolored popsicle sticks,
Speaker 1: and they like start to like even though they're not looking,
Speaker 1: they know where the mother is putting them. It's fucking crazy.
Speaker 1: Then they do another test, and then they do another
Speaker 1: test and it's just like they get it right, get
Speaker 1: it right, get it right, get it right, and it's
Speaker 1: a ninety to one hundred percent accuracy rate. Then they
Speaker 1: have her father sit in can't do it at all.
Speaker 1: So the mother for some reason, there's like a direct
Speaker 1: conduit between the child and the mother. There's zero conduit
Speaker 1: between the father and the child. I just think it's
Speaker 1: very interesting. So what I'm trying to get at is like,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that I don't go down the same
Speaker 1: you know, what I describe as the wool path that
Speaker 1: you guys sometimes do, it's not to say that I
Speaker 1: don't believe. There are stories of you know, human capacity
Speaker 1: and other weird things that we do not understand. And
Speaker 1: for the record, I have always believed unless this is
Speaker 1: a simulation, there are other civilizations, Like that's the only
Speaker 1: explanation in my opinion that like, if we'ren't a simulation,
Speaker 1: then it's totally plausible that like, yes, this is the
Speaker 1: only you know planet with life, if this is just
Speaker 1: a natural creation of the Big Bang, as the atheist
Speaker 1: what have you believe. Well, then obviously there are other
Speaker 1: planets that have life. It may not be you know,
Speaker 1: advanced to our level, but there's definitely life elsewhere. So
Speaker 1: if there are other planets, given that the universe is infinite,
Speaker 1: well then there has to be civilizations that are comparable
Speaker 1: or you know, potentially far exceeding in our capacity to
Speaker 1: us that would be that would be perceived perhaps as
Speaker 1: you know, angels or whatever, especially before we had any
Speaker 1: understanding of technology. So I'm not saying that it's impossible
Speaker 1: that we've been visited for the longest time and that
Speaker 1: there are you know, quote unquote spiritual beings or actually
Speaker 1: spiritual beings. Maybe I don't know, but I think it's
Speaker 1: all very interesting. I'm just I just wish I understood
Speaker 1: it more factually, because oftentimes it just gets caught up
Speaker 1: in you know, religiosity that it kind of loses its
Speaker 1: interest in like proving the case as opposed to just
Speaker 1: like asserting it. And I just want to proof.
Speaker 6: That's why I'm so interested in the disclosure, because I
Speaker 6: feel like we're gonna get a lot of these answers
Speaker 6: with disclosure.
Speaker 1: So that that I hope you're right, man, that'd be great. That.
Speaker 6: Yeah, the telekinesist thing that you're talking about is right
Speaker 6: along the lines of you know, Project MKLS or even
Speaker 6: the idea of like Stranger Things and what Booharsh was doing.
Speaker 1: This dude was like a world scout.
Speaker 6: He was going to like all over the place wherever
Speaker 6: there's a supernatural thing going on. So he found that dude,
Speaker 6: Uri gellerin Israel. He found another guy, doctor Arigo in Brazil,
Speaker 6: and he'd go and investigate and come bent and report
Speaker 6: his findings. In URI's case, he actually took this dude
Speaker 6: back with him to the States and then they you know,
Speaker 6: it seemed like Uri was like an unwilling participant in
Speaker 6: his experiments going forward. But there is certainly something happening here.
Speaker 6: And with these UFO files, if we're going to actually
Speaker 6: get disclosure, I feel like that is going to be
Speaker 6: a big part of it. Like the same thing with
Speaker 6: the Epstein file, we're like, well, who's on the list?
Speaker 6: Who cares? What did they do? And with the UFO files, like, oh, well,
Speaker 6: are there are there spaceships? Like for sure there's spaceships,
Speaker 6: I seen one, But what do they do?
Speaker 1: What is going on here?
Speaker 6: What are the implications of this is going to be
Speaker 6: way more fascinating for I think for us as human beings,
Speaker 6: and where we go.
Speaker 5: I tend to pull away from the conventional explanation as well,
Speaker 5: And that conventional explanation has become conventional by way of
Speaker 5: the propaganda machine. So most of our ideas about these aliens,
Speaker 5: ets whatever, and this idea of saving us, intervening, stopping
Speaker 5: mutually assured destruction, introducing new technologies. You will see this
Speaker 5: element driven home over and over again in none other
Speaker 5: than Hollywood. And it's like, I don't know, since when
Speaker 5: we're believing narrations that come from Hollywood, that seems to
Speaker 5: be a mistake in my opinion, especially since we're willing
Speaker 5: to accept the idea that much of Hollywood has been
Speaker 5: producing films that are designed to propagandize you with an
Speaker 5: ideology of sorts, and we're very comfortable going Hollywood will
Speaker 5: propagandize you to believe in gender ideology or you know,
Speaker 5: some sort of a political bent, some sort of democratic
Speaker 5: left leaning ideology is what's been served up lately.
Speaker 2: But what happens when that.
Speaker 6: What happens when the democratic left leaning ideology is directly
Speaker 6: in line with this alien religion or whatever you'd like
Speaker 6: to call that's this is the part that gives me pause.
Speaker 6: Like this, I think we're Republicans have all called this
Speaker 6: like a death cult, the global warming death cult, because
Speaker 6: everything that they propose and they suggest it comes at
Speaker 6: the behest of human beings, and it's like the policies
Speaker 6: are just completely destructive of death human beings.
Speaker 1: Yeah, every single time. But this is what they are,
Speaker 1: a death cult, I'm confident of that.
Speaker 6: Where are they hearing it from, though, Clint, They're hearing
Speaker 6: it from fucking outer space, these spaceships. This is like
Speaker 6: that kind of disclosure could really open up a door
Speaker 6: to why bit of a leap for me. I know
Speaker 6: it's a bit of a leip, but like, do the
Speaker 6: just just take a look at the CIA documents. Man,
Speaker 6: They're going to tell you what their findings were when
Speaker 6: they were channeling these entities. Look at anyone who's who's
Speaker 6: had an abduction experience. They come back and these aliens,
Speaker 6: if they didn't put anything in their ass, the aliens
Speaker 6: were forewarning them about some hippie dippy piece movement and
Speaker 6: we have to watch out for the environment, and you know,
Speaker 6: the technologies out of control things like this. It's the
Speaker 6: same message.
Speaker 1: Interesting, Yeah, it's a message. Yeah, I'm open to it.
Speaker 1: I just would like, ah, you know, if it's if
Speaker 1: it's a grand claim, it requires grand evidence, and I
Speaker 1: would just I would just like to understand it better.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not sure how to read it. I
Speaker 1: will say I'm totally convinced that the climate alarmist folks
Speaker 1: are gay unintentional well, they're definitely gay, but also unintentionally
Speaker 1: a death cult. Like I don't think that they I
Speaker 1: don't think that they intend to. I do think I mean,
Speaker 1: it comes from a place of altruism, right, but there
Speaker 1: I mean their perception of altuism. But the end result
Speaker 1: is that they believe that humanity is killing itself and
Speaker 1: therefore we have to decrease the population to save it.
Speaker 1: And it's like, so, what's what's the difference between that
Speaker 1: argument and genocide? Like, like, we don't want to kill
Speaker 1: the Palestinians, but we have to because we have to survive.
Speaker 1: You know that that's the same rationale.
Speaker 5: Science I'm going to call it. Scientism offers us a
Speaker 5: bolstering effect to that solution, and that bolstering effect is like, hey,
Speaker 5: we're kind of a fucking plague on the planet. Anyway,
Speaker 5: human beings aren't special. We came out of Primordi'll go,
Speaker 5: and we're really kind of fucking this place up. In fact,
Speaker 5: you could kind of look at us as a cancer. Uh,
Speaker 5: and so that really helps us. So go ahead and
Speaker 5: abort your babies. So go ahead and abort your babies.
Speaker 1: Exactly.
Speaker 2: Why don't we Look, we're almost at the hour forty mark.
Speaker 5: Let's get these super chats out of the way, and
Speaker 5: let's get the funk out of.
Speaker 1: Here, right.
Speaker 6: We got a two dollars super chat from thenother night,
Speaker 6: He says, I bet we'll never see former Republicans on it.
Speaker 6: He's referring to the Epstein client list, like Dick Cheney
Speaker 6: and George W.
Speaker 1: Bush.
Speaker 6: That would actually be interesting fun. I don't think Bush
Speaker 6: is on there. I just wouldn't put his name up
Speaker 6: there as somebody that would be on this list.
Speaker 1: What do you what do you think? I don't think.
Speaker 1: I don't know Bush is involved. I've never I've never
Speaker 1: heard about it.
Speaker 5: Isn't that I think Tripley calls him the George Bush
Speaker 5: death cult. I'd say he like took money, But I
Speaker 5: just don't. I don't know if I mean, but listen,
Speaker 5: if he is he is, I don't really care. Wouldn't
Speaker 5: be surprised at all. But I don't know that they're
Speaker 5: the olden calves that need protecting. I would see them
Speaker 5: as being likely offered up. You know, if we find
Speaker 5: a scenario where everybody else is getting tossed in the fire,
Speaker 5: including Republicans, then I don't see any any protections being
Speaker 5: offered to. Although the public sentiment geared towards Bush Junior
Speaker 5: has changed in recent years, it's kind of we find
Speaker 5: him an old, endearing, kind of a cheeky, sweet old man,
Speaker 5: which is weird because we totally forgot about everything that
Speaker 5: happened during his administration. But I recognize that there's been
Speaker 5: some of that lately. Is George Bush is kind of
Speaker 5: a funny guy, So maybe they are trying to protect him,
Speaker 5: but I don't think so.
Speaker 6: I think he'd get offered up if he did not.
Speaker 6: Nice guy five dollars, super chat, Thank you. Epstein isn't dead.
Speaker 6: Worst blackmailer ever. If you didn't have to have a
Speaker 6: kill switch. When a blackmailer dies, lives are ruined. No
Speaker 6: one's lives were ruined the blackmail just passed to the government.
Speaker 1: That's a good point.
Speaker 5: Dude, banger, not nice guy by the way, he's just
Speaker 5: on our last episode.
Speaker 1: That's a great point.
Speaker 5: A guy who's occupied is blackmail, not having a dead
Speaker 5: man switch, not having blackmail on the people who you know,
Speaker 5: there's certainly names they wouldn't have want him to release,
Speaker 5: and the threat of debt is or the threat of
Speaker 5: death rather, is not very compelling when it comes to
Speaker 5: whether or not you should, you know, spill these secrets.
Speaker 1: If they're gonna kill you, you're going to do it.
Speaker 1: So it's certainly a fair it's a fair argument. But
Speaker 1: I think it's equally plausible that this guy was working
Speaker 1: directly for the federal government and therefore they they had
Speaker 1: guardrails on his data. So like, I don't I don't
Speaker 1: know what mechanisms they could actually create, but I like
Speaker 1: imagine that he is in fact working for CIA. M
Speaker 1: I six Masade. Do you think they don't have this
Speaker 1: guy fucking surveilled just as much as he's surveiling all
Speaker 1: of his blackmail victims. Like so, I I'm just saying
Speaker 1: it wouldn't be as easy as people make it sound.
Speaker 5: Like if I'm right about what he was doing JMS
Speaker 5: as ear lobes. That's in reference to the last picture
Speaker 5: of him on the kind of mortuary table, and they're
Speaker 5: saying that is ear look different. And I know that
Speaker 5: you can posthegically if you get a facelift, that you
Speaker 5: lose your ear lobes.
Speaker 1: So shut up, Bill Burr, Shut up, Bill Berr. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so is that the explanation could be.
Speaker 5: But but I'm inclined to be very suspicious as to
Speaker 5: whether or not he's actually dead myself.
Speaker 6: We got a couple more super chats five dollars from
Speaker 6: YouTube sim Cowpen.
Speaker 1: What's up? Man?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 1: I can't even pronounce that name.
Speaker 6: Jesse so Bitar, Yeah, I know her, or Sebatar, whatever
Speaker 6: her name is. Jesse Bitar claims she saw Elon Musk
Speaker 6: as a child participating in a human sacrifice ritual during
Speaker 6: her days in the Mothers of Darkness. Any thoughts on that.
Speaker 6: I have heard that story myself. At the end of
Speaker 6: the day, it's just a story. It's unverifiable.
Speaker 5: Much like the housekeeper alleged housekeeper of Elon Musk, who
Speaker 5: was a nanny or a housekeeper when he was younger.
Speaker 5: There's a video that's going viral or has gone viral
Speaker 5: in the past few years, where she is giving her
Speaker 5: testimony on camera. She's saying, I saw Elon Musk as
Speaker 5: a child do bizarre things that no child should be
Speaker 5: able to do. She hints at this idea of portals.
Speaker 5: I believe she even uses the word whatever she saw
Speaker 5: drives her to ask Elon Musk's mother, who's a bizarre
Speaker 5: character herself? Is he the Antichrist, to which she rebuts, no,
Speaker 5: he's not the anti Christ, but he will bring about
Speaker 5: the mark of the Beast. Now very compelling, very sexy,
Speaker 5: very fun, but it's the fucking dead end. It leads
Speaker 5: absolutely nowhere. So I don't know thoughts. I like it,
Speaker 5: but I you know, that's about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one one person's testimony should never be enough to
Speaker 1: prove a case in my opinion.
Speaker 6: So although it is interesting, we were talking yesterday on
Speaker 6: FLM desk squad about Elon Musk and his last straw
Speaker 6: with Kanye West. When Kanye West posted the Raelian sign,
Speaker 6: the Raelian symbol which is the star of David with
Speaker 6: the Nazi the Nazis swastika like in it. It's a
Speaker 6: really solid logo graphic design standpoint, like it has great symmetry.
Speaker 6: But that's what these these symbols are. They're very symmetrical.
Speaker 6: It's like, you know, two perfect triangles up and down.
Speaker 6: And then the swastika is like it represents this movement?
Speaker 5: Is it?
Speaker 1: The North Star? Is that what it's.
Speaker 5: Supposed to be, The Big Dipper, the Big Dipper right
Speaker 5: procession through the equinoxes, so it's it's literally it's representative
Speaker 5: of time. Yeah, but really what was interesting about that
Speaker 5: is that you have Elon Musk. He sees this symbol
Speaker 5: and he's not offended because of the the nature of it,
Speaker 5: like with the is, with the Jews and the Nazis.
Speaker 5: It seems like he's offended because of the Rallian cult,
Speaker 5: which these dudes, if you you can watch the Netflix documentary,
Speaker 5: but they're balls deep in like it's it's a sex cult.
Speaker 5: It's alien worshiped stuff, like they call them the elohem
Speaker 5: and they worship them. They have sex with other people's wives.
Speaker 5: But what they're really doing there is some kind of
Speaker 5: cloning thing. They're running a cloning operation, and there's a
Speaker 5: lot of speculation as to whether they actually did clone
Speaker 5: a person, but they were deeply involved with this. And
Speaker 5: this goes to my argument with IVF. It's a whole thing,
Speaker 5: but I think that, Yeah, Elon Musk is a shady,
Speaker 5: shady dude. I don't like what he's doing, but I
Speaker 5: enjoy watching him do it. To that point, to simp
Speaker 5: Calvin's point, or to answer the question a little bit better,
Speaker 5: there is no shortage of things that are more verifiable
Speaker 5: than Jesse's story. I have heard Jesse's story, and you know,
Speaker 5: it's it's at the end of the day, it's it's
Speaker 5: just that. Not to say that it's not true or
Speaker 5: it's false, but it is. It stands on its own.
Speaker 5: It's just a story. Nowhere else to go from there. Yep,
Speaker 5: all right, Dylan Farnham. I'm really tired of UFOs and
Speaker 5: Nigfoot me too, can't stand him.
Speaker 2: Move out of the cities.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and Dylan Farnham again five dollars. On page four
Speaker 6: seventy three of the released files, it says a MASAD
Speaker 6: agent code named bottom Shrimp. Interpret that as you will, Yeah,
Speaker 6: Bottom Shrimp.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I may have got may or may not have
Speaker 1: been there on the island, So I guess that's a
Speaker 1: I like.
Speaker 5: The idea that if top was an intelligence asset, it
Speaker 5: would be a Masad intelligence asset and not a CIA.
Speaker 1: That'll be quite the twist.
Speaker 5: That would be quite that. That's why the most entertaining
Speaker 5: outcome is the likeliest outcome.
Speaker 6: They never see me coming. And oh, another five dollars
Speaker 6: from aiming rat. This is on the Dangerous Retards Rumble page. Guys,
Speaker 6: if you're watching us now, we have our own rumble page,
Speaker 6: we have our own YouTube. Go there and check it
Speaker 6: out here Dangerous rt r d's five dollars. I testify
Speaker 6: that Klunt is a queer. That's not Niceunt Clunt, that's gross.
Speaker 6: I don't like Clunt.
Speaker 5: Yeah, guys, we are up on We're also on Odyssey.
Speaker 5: The is listening on Odyssey. Uh, but we're on Odyssey,
Speaker 5: So we're on Odyssey. We're on YouTube, we're on Apple, Podcast, Spotify,
Speaker 5: all those places rumble. So if you're not already subscribed,
Speaker 5: please go and subscribe, because after some time we won't
Speaker 5: be streaming to all these places. We'll be streaming exclusively
Speaker 5: to Dangerous Retards outlets.
Speaker 6: Yes, that's right, and thank you, thank you for the
Speaker 6: support so far. This has been a it has been
Speaker 6: a fairly big show so far for like a what
Speaker 6: it is like, we kind of just started this thing
Speaker 6: and it does it outpaces Nefhlum desquad by itself, probably
Speaker 6: because Clint is here, so yeah watching, but but but.
Speaker 1: I thought that if I were to lie, then it
Speaker 1: would grow faster.
Speaker 5: Clint, somebody somebody has to lie, right, There's three of us, So.
Speaker 1: I'm not here to look pretty. I'm here to look tired.
Speaker 1: But I'm doing a good job at that. Thank you
Speaker 1: guys so much for tuning into Dangerous Retards Episode three.
Speaker 1: Please do subscribe on your favorite podcasters as well as
Speaker 1: YouTube brumble dangerous rt r d s so we can't
Speaker 1: obviously do the full name, and it's real talk, real dudes,
Speaker 1: you know it's it has nothing to do with, you know,
Speaker 1: any slight towards the retards, because we love retards. We
Speaker 1: are retards. We are dangerous retards. You're dangerous retards. That's
Speaker 1: why you tune in every week because you're dangerous retarchs
Speaker 1: and we will be dangerous retards together. It's a dangerous
Speaker 1: retarded place and time to exist. And we appreciate you.
Speaker 6: One more thing before we get out of here, just
Speaker 6: you're gonna step on that you on Nephlam des Squad
Speaker 6: on Rumble, we just broke five thousand followers, which is
Speaker 6: and we are about to break half a million total
Speaker 6: views on Rumble, which is I think good for like
Speaker 6: a smaller laugh.
Speaker 1: That's great, dude, I don't yeah, I don't know what trumbles.
Speaker 6: Half those views are fake, but whatever, baby, there's stole
Speaker 6: a lot of them up there. So thank you guys
Speaker 6: for everything. That's how Rumble works.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I'm at I don't know, eighty five
Speaker 1: hundred or something on Rumble, so most people don't watch
Speaker 1: me there. But if you guys can subscribe to Liberty
Speaker 1: Lockdown on Rumble, Liberty Lockdown on YouTube all of audio
Speaker 1: Podcatchers but Dangerous Arty, RDS, Nefhlin, Death Squad, Tower Gang
Speaker 1: if you want. And in Liberty Lockdown, we're rut here. Peace,
Speaker 1: Peace out, got