Speaker 1: Night side with Dan Ray ONBZ Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2: So thanks to all the callers who joined us on
Speaker 2: the SO scurity issue. And I'll tell you that tomorrow
Speaker 2: I will have Jim Roosevelt on Boston Attorney and also
Speaker 2: the grandson of Franklin Roosevelt. We'll talk about so scurity
Speaker 2: tomorrow night. Now, I am very supportive of the Trump
Speaker 2: administration's efforts to get gangland gang members and terrorist members
Speaker 2: of MS thirteen, members of the Venezuelan gang, who they've
Speaker 2: now sent at least a couple of flights, one to
Speaker 2: Al Salvador and at least a couple of flights back
Speaker 2: to Venezuela. I am certainly interested in pulling criminals off
Speaker 2: the streets of the country. And I know that there
Speaker 2: will be some friends of mine in the ACLU who
Speaker 2: will disagree with me, and who will say that every
Speaker 2: he has a trial, everybody should have due process. And
Speaker 2: I think that if you have come here illegally and
Speaker 2: you remember of a gang, or if you're someone who
Speaker 2: has been convicted of a crime, get him out of
Speaker 2: the country, make them serve their time, and then get
Speaker 2: them out of the country. However, I don't understand, and
Speaker 2: maybe someone can explain it to me why the Trump
Speaker 2: administration has decided to do some of these arrests in public.
Speaker 2: There's one that has taken place here in Medford, Massachusetts,
Speaker 2: at Tufts. A woman who's here from Turkey as thirty
Speaker 2: year old. She's some sort of a graduate student dealing
Speaker 2: with it seems like a relatively non controversial situation. She
Speaker 2: has apparently co edited or co written a piece that
Speaker 2: was supportive of Hamas. I am appalled that anyone would
Speaker 2: support Hamas in any way, shape or form. However, she
Speaker 2: had a visa, she was here legally, the visa was
Speaker 2: terminated and she was arrested on the streets by about
Speaker 2: five or six plane clothes ice officers. It's not a
Speaker 2: good look. It is something that basically, I think becomes
Speaker 2: visually so disconcerting that even people who support like me,
Speaker 2: the deportation of gang members, the trend di Agua Gang
Speaker 2: MS thirteen and others are a little well, I wouldn't
Speaker 2: say upset, but I'm certainly somewhat quizzical. The other thing
Speaker 2: is that I want to mention is that many of
Speaker 2: these people who have been arrested taken into custody and
Speaker 2: moved Louisiana. There's not much information other than she she
Speaker 2: wrote a piece supporting Hamas. I mean, uh, there's no
Speaker 2: one who is more pro Israel as far as I know. Then,
Speaker 2: I I don't see how you can be much more
Speaker 2: pro Israel than I am. But if she's here legally
Speaker 2: on a visa, uh and she decides to write a
Speaker 2: pro hamas h editorial. Uh And if you want to
Speaker 2: look at at whenever the visa expires and make it
Speaker 2: make a decision upon that. Those sort of actions administratively,
Speaker 2: I'm okay with that, But I'm not okay with suspending,
Speaker 2: terminating the visa and arresting them on the streets because
Speaker 2: I think it's counterproductive and I think it gives ammunition
Speaker 2: to the other side. Uh And and just because I
Speaker 2: agree with or I disagree with the the arrest of
Speaker 2: the graduate student. There's a professor from Brown, a medical
Speaker 2: professor who was sent back to Lebanon because she had
Speaker 2: attended Alma's funeral. I want to know the specifics, Okay,
Speaker 2: I don't want to If we're going to terminate visas
Speaker 2: which we extended, I want to know there has to
Speaker 2: be a modicum of due process for that, and I
Speaker 2: didn't see any modicum of due process. Now I know
Speaker 2: somebody going to disagree, Bring it on. I think there's
Speaker 2: a distinct difference between a member of a known terrorist
Speaker 2: organization such as Trendi Agua or MS thirteen and someone
Speaker 2: who's here on a visa legally who has a different
Speaker 2: point of view than I do have that I have
Speaker 2: Onjmas or the government has on Hamas. Let me go
Speaker 2: next to Undan in San Francisco. Hey, Dan, it's been
Speaker 2: a while. Welcome back. How are you good?
Speaker 3: Dan? Thanks very much for taking my call. And this
Speaker 3: is gonna be one of those nights where you and
Speaker 3: I agree completely about what's going on.
Speaker 2: Okay, I agree with you that.
Speaker 3: The arrest of that particular student, Ramesa oz Turk in
Speaker 3: Somerville was visually disconcerting, and I believe it is counterproductive,
Speaker 3: and I do believe that it makes America look bad.
Speaker 2: Do you let me ask you this, Do you agree
Speaker 2: with me? I don't have a problem what they did
Speaker 2: with Trent Ragua. And by the way, if in that
Speaker 2: mass arrest there were any individuals who were picked up incorrectly,
Speaker 2: I want them returned here. Okay, yes, you know, and
Speaker 2: I think that the that when you have a mass
Speaker 2: arrest like that and a mass deportation, the potential for
Speaker 2: mistake occurs. The fact that someone was a Venezuelan soccer
Speaker 2: player doesn't necessarily mean they're not a member of trent
Speaker 2: Do Agua, by the way, but if they are not
Speaker 2: a member of trent to Agua or an active member,
Speaker 2: they should be allowed to return here. And I mean
Speaker 2: they were talking about some guy who was a gay
Speaker 2: barber or somewhere in California. He could still be a
Speaker 2: member of trend to Agua. That doesn't But if the
Speaker 2: person is living here, working as a barber or as
Speaker 2: a soccer player or whatever, and they have no association
Speaker 2: with the gang, bring him back.
Speaker 3: And I agree with you on that too. And as
Speaker 3: you mentioned, the student, missus Oster, was not a gang
Speaker 3: member and she was not a terrorist. She's actually a
Speaker 3: doctoral student and what she's studying is a child study
Speaker 3: in human development at Tuff's University, and she's here on
Speaker 3: a full write scholarship, and she had a valid F
Speaker 3: one student visa. And the the op ed that she
Speaker 3: wrote in the newspaper for Tufts was written a year ago. Okay,
Speaker 3: so now all of a sudden she's targeted. And I
Speaker 3: also want to point out that in her op ed,
Speaker 3: she did not support Hamas and she did not support terrorism.
Speaker 3: All she was saying she was talking about the university
Speaker 3: divesting some of its endowment from Israeli companies, and she
Speaker 3: talked about the Palestinians who are getting killed in the
Speaker 3: war and gods of the Palestinian civilians.
Speaker 2: Yeahs, I will disagree with that. That's the the b
Speaker 2: d I I believe boycott divest uh the movement or
Speaker 2: the BDS. Is it TI or b d I or BDS.
Speaker 4: That I.
Speaker 3: Know is she didn't support Hamas and she didn't support terrorism.
Speaker 2: And yes, I will do agree with her on the
Speaker 2: idea of boycotting Israel. I'll disagree with her on anything
Speaker 2: that you know, Palestinians being killed. I'm sad that there
Speaker 2: were Palestinians being killed, but guess what, the Israelis have
Speaker 2: to defend themselves. So I will debate her on all
Speaker 2: of those topics. But at the same time, I come
Speaker 2: down to the final the place you are, and that
Speaker 2: is that it is counterproductive when you have people like
Speaker 2: that swopped up on the street. It is just not
Speaker 2: a good look, that's all. That's that's where I'm coming from.
Speaker 3: And it was filmed, right and just to let you know,
Speaker 3: I mean, I think you know, but what the audience
Speaker 3: to know that the people who arrested her were wearing
Speaker 3: playing clothes, they were wearing masks. Most of they didn't
Speaker 3: identify themselves to her, and they handcuffed.
Speaker 2: Well, they did know they they I couldn't tell what.
Speaker 2: Here's what I think happened. She was targeted, okay, And
Speaker 2: I think that there were some cars that were parked
Speaker 2: in this area of the school, whether it was on
Speaker 2: the school campus or whether it was just off campus.
Speaker 2: And I think there was someone in an apartment who
Speaker 2: noticed the cars and they put one and one together
Speaker 2: and they had their video cam and and they happened
Speaker 2: to have That's why it wasn't videotaped by the government.
Speaker 2: It was videotaped by another person, probably a student. But
Speaker 2: there was a point in time where you could see
Speaker 2: where they took their badges out, so she knew that
Speaker 2: she was not being kidnapped, not that that was any
Speaker 2: consolation in her, but there was an effort they showed.
Speaker 2: I saw one of them show what look to me
Speaker 2: like a badge. It wasn't like they were coming up
Speaker 2: to her without showing any identification and they were taking
Speaker 2: the badges. The badges were down inside their sweatshirts or
Speaker 2: whatever their their their outer clothing was, and then you
Speaker 2: take the badge out and you hang it so it
Speaker 2: can be seen. You know. So that's still at one
Speaker 2: point that I wanted to disagree with you on.
Speaker 3: Okay, okay, okay, But I don't know why they didn't
Speaker 3: have uniforms on right. I mean, imagine if you were
Speaker 3: surrounded by six people and they pull out something that
Speaker 3: could be a badge, and maybe maybe not a badge.
Speaker 3: They didn't look like law enforcement.
Speaker 2: Well, if they were sitting in cars with you, they
Speaker 2: were sitting, if they were sitting at cars, and if
Speaker 2: they were sitting in the cars with uniforms, and their
Speaker 2: goal was to apprehend this woman, or if their goal
Speaker 2: was to apprehend a more dangerous person, sitting in cars
Speaker 2: with uniform probably would be counter productive, don't you think, Well.
Speaker 3: Let's look at her. She's a thirty year old woman
Speaker 3: who's a PhD student.
Speaker 5: You know, I can't look I'm with you on that
Speaker 5: at all.
Speaker 2: But I have. My point is that that she shouldn't
Speaker 2: have been had her visa pulled, and if the visa
Speaker 2: was there, she shouldn't have been was she still shouldn't
Speaker 2: have been arrested. Whether they were in uniform. Look, ICE
Speaker 2: agents are not the most popular group of people here
Speaker 2: in in Medford, Massachusetts, as I'm sure you know, so
Speaker 2: you know they they probably were doing what they felt
Speaker 2: that they had to do for their own safety as well.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, I mean, there are people out there
Speaker 2: who are now saying, there's a guy on TikTok today
Speaker 2: saying when you see an ICE agent, shoot him.
Speaker 3: No, No, that's crazy talk.
Speaker 2: Of course it's crazy talking. But if you're an ICE
Speaker 2: agent and you're there to apprehend someone, and you've been
Speaker 2: given an assignment, and you say do I have to
Speaker 2: wear a uniform? If they say no, we want you
Speaker 2: to go playing clothes, you will, I think that's that's
Speaker 2: a criticism that's somewhat peripheral at the moment in terms
Speaker 2: of the major point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'll accept that, all right, Great, I do want
Speaker 3: to say, if I may, is that really I mean,
Speaker 3: it's making us look xenophobic, it's making us look authoritarian.
Speaker 3: It's making us look hypocritical in terms of not respecting
Speaker 3: freedom of speech and due process and the rule of law.
Speaker 3: And it's it's just antagonizing our allies around the world
Speaker 3: when Trump really should be paying attention to getting prices down.
Speaker 3: That's what he ran on, that's what he was elected on,
Speaker 3: and it's it's not all of this uh, sweeping up
Speaker 3: people and harassment.
Speaker 2: But but you are okay with getting the terrorist out
Speaker 2: of the country. I hope we're in agreement on that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yes, yeah, okay, but this is going too far.
Speaker 2: I good enough. Okay, we're on the We're on the
Speaker 2: same page. We're on the same page. Okay, thank you much,
Speaker 2: thank you very much. Thanks, Okay, thanks San Francisco, one
Speaker 2: of my great callers from San Francisco. Okay, thanks, thank you.
Speaker 2: Bye bye, all right, bye bye. The bar is not
Speaker 2: that high. We'll take a quick break if you'd like
Speaker 2: to join the conversation. If you agree or disagree, feel free.
Speaker 2: Six one, seven, two, five four to ten thirty six
Speaker 2: one seven, nine, three one ten thirty. This is one
Speaker 2: you know. Look, I understand the goal and the fact
Speaker 2: that there are people self deporting. That's a good thing.
Speaker 2: As well in my opinion. Okay, but just as we
Speaker 2: criticized the deportation of the Mexican the family, the mom
Speaker 2: and dad who were illegals, their ten year old daughter
Speaker 2: dealing with brain cancer and she was stopped on the
Speaker 2: way to a hospital and then they were deported. That's
Speaker 2: not America. Come on, guys, let's uh. You know, I'm
Speaker 2: as much of a lauren on a person as anyone,
Speaker 2: But there's a few there's always an exception to some
Speaker 2: of these rules, and some of the rules in this case,
Speaker 2: I think, just pulling visas because someone wrote something and
Speaker 2: disagree with there's a big step between that and someone
Speaker 2: who actually is an active terrorist. The guy in New
Speaker 2: York may have a different situation because what he may
Speaker 2: or may not have done in Colombia. But I've seen
Speaker 2: no evidence that this Turkish woman did anything other than
Speaker 2: write a piece for I guess a local newspaper or
Speaker 2: maybe the student newspaper. Back on nights Side, right after this,
Speaker 2: It's Night Tide.
Speaker 1: With Dan Ray on Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2: Back we Go, Bob is in California. Bob, appreciate your patience.
Speaker 2: You were next on Night Side, Bob.
Speaker 4: Yes, Stan Good evening, Dan, I respectfully disagree with you
Speaker 4: on this and the previous caller okay, tell us, well, yeah,
Speaker 4: we okay, we are at war. We're at war with Hamas, Isbela,
Speaker 4: and Iran, and they're expressed preppers, as you obviously know,
Speaker 4: is the annihilation of Israel. They don't want Israel to exist.
Speaker 4: And when you have somebody in this country like that student,
Speaker 4: she's pro terrorist, Okay, she was supporting Hamas, get her
Speaker 4: out of here. Okay. If you're supporting Hamas, you are
Speaker 4: anti Semitic, and you are pro terrorist, and you are
Speaker 4: obviously abilivious to what happened October seventh. You probably never
Speaker 4: saw any films about the Holocaust. Okay, how dare her
Speaker 4: come to this country national resources and then start writing
Speaker 4: an editorial where you're supporting terrorism and of us. No,
Speaker 4: there was a great move to get her out okay.
Speaker 4: And I love like with Columbia. Columbia fired their president
Speaker 4: as you know, they suddenly put money ahead of their
Speaker 4: so called principles. You know, they were an incubator. Columbia,
Speaker 4: like a lot of these universities of hate. Okay. Now,
Speaker 4: the argument that some people use, like the last caller,
Speaker 4: is oh, free speech. No, hate speech does not fall
Speaker 4: under free speech.
Speaker 2: Well, I understand your point. The problem is this, I
Speaker 2: might be sympathetic to the idea of moving people like
Speaker 2: this out of the country. However, I think the way
Speaker 2: in which you do things is important. And I just
Speaker 2: think that the optics of this woman walking down the
Speaker 2: street alone and being confronted by six Ice agents again,
Speaker 2: she did not look like a terrorist. I have not
Speaker 2: read the article that she wrote. You may have, but
Speaker 2: it would have to have really been more than just
Speaker 2: simple simple empathy for that point of view. If she
Speaker 2: celebrated if in the article, I should probably have tried
Speaker 2: to find the article, and maybe I will by this
Speaker 2: time tomorrow find it. If she had celebrated what Hamas
Speaker 2: did on October seventh, that's a different story. That's a
Speaker 2: different story in my opinion. But she if she wrote
Speaker 2: a relatively bland article, and maybe in the break I
Speaker 2: will try to give it a quick read here. And
Speaker 2: I may have been remiss and not reading it. I
Speaker 2: just I haven't seen this should have been if the
Speaker 2: White House was certain, Bob, it would have been nice
Speaker 2: if they said, after they arrested her, we have arrested
Speaker 2: phil in her name. The reason we have arrested her
Speaker 2: is her visa was revoked. The reason we revoked her
Speaker 2: visa was because on this date, in this news article
Speaker 2: she wrote quote whatever she said. I would feel differently
Speaker 2: about it depending upon what they came up with. But
Speaker 2: the only response from the White House so far is
Speaker 2: that that she wrote an article which was a supportive
Speaker 2: of Hamas. But I wish it was. I wish they
Speaker 2: would lay it out. What do they mean by supportive?
Speaker 2: Do you know what I'm trying, what I'm trying to say, or.
Speaker 4: No, I think you have a point. But again, I'm
Speaker 4: going to go write back to what I said. I'm
Speaker 4: okay with what they did. Okay, we'll send a message
Speaker 4: if you're in this country and or thousands or students
Speaker 4: that have come here to use our resources, if they
Speaker 4: hate America, like clearly she does, is she's pro Hamas,
Speaker 4: then okay, go to the guys the strip, go over indeed,
Speaker 4: with the Palestinians, go where you know, go over there. Okay,
Speaker 4: don't come to this country and be writing hate speech.
Speaker 4: Don't be doing that. And I'm totally okay with how
Speaker 4: they removed her. Okay, but then I'm saying.
Speaker 2: But what I'm saying is if if she was writing
Speaker 2: hate speech, I wish they had laid it out for me.
Speaker 2: Uh and so I could see what the what the
Speaker 2: hate speech was. I'm looking at an article here from
Speaker 2: National Review, which is a conservative magazine. They write, the writer,
Speaker 2: who I do not know, says, while I can see
Speaker 2: the legality of the administration's move against Ramasha Ousturk, I
Speaker 2: reject this morality imprudence. You're a Turkish graduate student at
Speaker 2: Tufts University named Remisa auster Co wrote an op ed
Speaker 2: for the school's newspaper complaining about the administration's failure to
Speaker 2: respect student government demands for the university's divest from Israel.
Speaker 2: Few seem to have read the piece. Rather than a
Speaker 2: statement of anti Semitic ideology, it's a bland process complaint
Speaker 2: about anti Semitic ideology, landed with Gratruda's quotes from James
Speaker 2: Baldwin typically forget to put left wing juvenilia. In other words,
Speaker 2: I'm going to read the article during the break here, Bob,
Speaker 2: and I'll, you know, I will come back and and
Speaker 2: see what what what I might come up with here? Okay,
Speaker 2: this this article was written, was published on March twenty six,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four. So let me see what I come
Speaker 2: Let me see what I come up with.
Speaker 4: Okay, Okay. Clearly she's anti Israel. Okay, she was criticizing,
Speaker 4: you know, for the ties of Israel. She's anti Israel, Okay,
Speaker 4: which means she's pro terrorist. She's pro hamas well.
Speaker 2: I don't know. That might be for me a bridge
Speaker 2: too far. I'm very pro Israel. Okay, But let me
Speaker 2: let me read the article, and I can read it,
Speaker 2: and I'll come back on the other side and I'll
Speaker 2: have comment on it. Okay, I will. I've found it
Speaker 2: and we will read it, I promise you. Okay.
Speaker 4: Sounds good. All right, Thanks, thank you, Dan, Thanks.
Speaker 2: Bob, good night, talk to you. So good. All right,
Speaker 2: all right, let me take a quick break here, we'll
Speaker 2: break a little early. I'm going to talk to John
Speaker 2: and Bob, and if you want to join us, feel free.
Speaker 2: Six one, seven, two, five, four, ten thirty, six, seven, nine,
Speaker 2: three thirty. This article appeared in the Toughs Daily, which
Speaker 2: is the student newspaper at Toughts. It was written co
Speaker 2: written by four individuals. It was published March twenty sixth
Speaker 2: a year ago. Twenty and twenty four. I'll read it
Speaker 2: and I'll have some comments when we get back, and
Speaker 2: i'd love to get your reaction to what we're talking about.
Speaker 2: We'll be back on Nightside.
Speaker 1: It's Night Side with Dan Ray on Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2: Okay, as I promised, I've just read the op ad
Speaker 2: written by these four individuals, including Rumeisha Ostork, the woman
Speaker 2: who was arrested last week near either on or near
Speaker 2: the Toughs University campus. The first paragraph I'm going to
Speaker 2: read to you of the is all I want to
Speaker 2: focus on. This is only an op ed piece of three, four, five, six, seven,
Speaker 2: eight paragraphs. It's not that long. On March fourth, the
Speaker 2: Toughs Community Union sent it passed three out of four
Speaker 2: resolutions demanding that the university acknowledged the Palestinian genocide, apologize
Speaker 2: for university President Saneil Kamara's statements to close its investments,
Speaker 2: and divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel.
Speaker 2: These resolutions are the product of meaningful debate by the Senate.
Speaker 2: This is the tough University. It's not the United States Senate.
Speaker 2: It's a bunch of students, okay, and represent some sincere
Speaker 2: effort to hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law.
Speaker 2: Now we're getting into an area that's problematic. Credible accusations
Speaker 2: against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation, I don't think
Speaker 2: that's a pretty strong allegation, indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians,
Speaker 2: and plausible genocide. This is obviously a woman whose mind
Speaker 2: is not in the right place. But there's a lot
Speaker 2: of people on the left's minds or not in the
Speaker 2: right place, and we can't kick them out of the
Speaker 2: country for their minds not being the right place. I
Speaker 2: wish my friend, I hope my friend Bob is listening.
Speaker 2: Credible accusations, first of all, credible by whom against Israel
Speaker 2: include accounts of deliberate starvation, really indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians,
Speaker 2: and plausible genocide. Well, we did have indiscriminate slaughter of
Speaker 2: Israeli civilians that we know on October seventh. We did
Speaker 2: have plausible genocide allegations because I think the individuals who
Speaker 2: went in and attacked the folks at the dance festival
Speaker 2: and went into the Kobutz's area and killed older, old men,
Speaker 2: old women as and infants. I think that was genocide.
Speaker 2: I think they went after them because they were Jewish.
Speaker 2: I think that's pretty clear or Israeli. Israel then has
Speaker 2: a right to defend themselves. This is stupid, editory, stupid
Speaker 2: position taken by people who obviously may be antisemitic, certainly
Speaker 2: are anti Israel. But I still don't think that once
Speaker 2: you give a visa to someone that you can rescind
Speaker 2: the visa or revoke the visa because they've written a stupid,
Speaker 2: tough daily editorial, in my opinion, and I don't think
Speaker 2: that that's where the American people want the Trump administration
Speaker 2: to focus, in my opinion, and I just think it's
Speaker 2: a bad look. So if you'd like to join the conversation,
Speaker 2: you can agree or disagree. I've got a couple of
Speaker 2: lines still open. Six one, seven, two, five, four ten
Speaker 2: thirty or six one seven, nine three one ten thirty.
Speaker 2: Let me go next to Bob and Rain and Bob
Speaker 2: you were next on Nightside. Hi, Bob, how are you.
Speaker 4: Good?
Speaker 6: How's it going?
Speaker 2: Dan going great? If I'm not mistaken, you're you're a
Speaker 2: pretty solid supporter of President Trump? Correct?
Speaker 6: Yeah, I would, yeah, definitely.
Speaker 2: Okay, so I am I right or wrong on this
Speaker 2: issue in your opinion. I want to hear what you say.
Speaker 6: So I guess I don't like the look of, you know,
Speaker 6: actually doing it in broad daylight. But I have to
Speaker 6: say just I think that we should be removing these
Speaker 6: people just as they were allowed into the country at
Speaker 6: two o'clock in the morning while we were sleeping. And
Speaker 6: I don't know if this is a particular case. But
Speaker 6: while I don't think.
Speaker 2: She supposedly is a full bright scholar, I don't think
Speaker 2: she's too bright anyway. But that's okay. That sort of
Speaker 2: diminished the standards if she's a full bright scholar. This
Speaker 2: article could have been written by a seventh grader. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's there's nothing astonishing about this article. But go ahead.
Speaker 2: I don't mean I did not well, I did mean
Speaker 2: to interrupt. Go ahead.
Speaker 6: Well, I think there might be more to it than
Speaker 6: just that article. There you know these you know that
Speaker 6: where you know that the Trump administration is looking at.
Speaker 6: And also i'd like to say that you know how
Speaker 6: quickly we forget uh nine to eleven uh, those folks
Speaker 6: are simulated in the communities. They went to cookouts, they
Speaker 6: were in bowling leagues, I believe, and stuff like that,
Speaker 6: and we know what happened there. And I don't believe
Speaker 6: that the First Amendment applies to people on student visas.
Speaker 6: And if they speak against our country or our allies
Speaker 6: or whatever. And I think for any kind of you know,
Speaker 6: hate hate type message, they should be removed from the
Speaker 6: country or Okay, I can.
Speaker 2: Understand your position there. But having read the article, the
Speaker 2: toughest part of the article, the one sentence that most
Speaker 2: offends me as a supporter of Israel and as someone
Speaker 2: who who insists on the survivor of Israel. Credible accusations
Speaker 2: against Israel include acounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter
Speaker 2: of Palestinine civilians and plausible Gemiside genocide. They they, they
Speaker 2: they sweet, They write with these these wide brushes and
Speaker 2: they don't substantiate anything. And first of all, if there's
Speaker 2: any any genocide that was involved, it was on October seventh,
Speaker 2: the morning of October seventh, at the music festival, and
Speaker 2: in the kibbutz.
Speaker 6: Of course it was.
Speaker 2: But I just think that that that that the administration
Speaker 2: before they pick someone up like this here, she's not
Speaker 2: she's not should be the first group that that she's
Speaker 2: that they're worried about. I would be worried about. Let's
Speaker 2: get the terrorists out first, Let's get the criminals out second, uh,
Speaker 2: and then we can start to worry about maybe some
Speaker 2: of the agitators within these these uh these campuses. Okay,
Speaker 2: and the guy in in Colombia, he may have been
Speaker 2: somebody who was a real leader of that demonstration. That's
Speaker 2: different than somebody writing a juvenile op ed piece in
Speaker 2: a college newspaper, in my opinion.
Speaker 6: But is that the only issue?
Speaker 2: Well, I assum it was the only issue because the
Speaker 2: administration hasn't said. Look, we've also found out that she
Speaker 2: was going to whatever fill in the blank, going to
Speaker 2: Hamas meetings, sending money to Hamas, whatever they got on her.
Speaker 2: What if you go to a rest her and you're
Speaker 2: going to kick her out of the country, and you're
Speaker 2: going to revoke her visa, which have already done. Give
Speaker 2: me some reasons, give me some reasons. Make your point.
Speaker 2: It's not a good look. You said it, I've said it.
Speaker 2: And so what happens is that undercuts the public support
Speaker 2: for what the Trump administration is rightfully doing.
Speaker 6: I agree with that fair enough.
Speaker 2: All right, Bob, appreciate your call very much. Thank you much.
Speaker 2: Skip Rowling here got John in Boston. John, you might
Speaker 2: wrap us for the night, Go ahead, John.
Speaker 5: I just don't think it was a good look for
Speaker 5: that woman to be supporting Hamas with that letter. Listening
Speaker 5: to an intel expert, Deep Sarah Adams, she's well known,
Speaker 5: uh knows about terrorism, and she says right now is
Speaker 5: one thousand terrorists here in this country right now, and
Speaker 5: they need facilitators and sympathizers to support them. That's how
Speaker 5: they get around, that's how they're able to function in
Speaker 5: this country. And Hamas stopped at American hostage American hostages
Speaker 5: in Israel who are captured, and Mamas is directly connected
Speaker 5: to the Muslim Brotherhood, who was connected to Arafat, who
Speaker 5: is connected to Otto Gazzini hit his favorite commando. And
Speaker 5: it's like this woman is not you know, she's standing.
Speaker 6: Up for Hamas.
Speaker 5: They are killers.
Speaker 2: In the article, by the way, the article that I've
Speaker 2: just read in its entirety, because it's not that long,
Speaker 2: never mentions Hamas.
Speaker 5: Well. The thing is Dan, she's speaking out for the group.
Speaker 5: And it's interesting that the FBI is seriously because they
Speaker 5: talked about nothing. Look, well, the FBI showed up to
Speaker 5: that seventy five year oud grandmother in Kingston, mass and
Speaker 5: blackass ups to arrest her because she was in an
Speaker 5: abortion play playing she wasn't blocking terrances, and no one
Speaker 5: said a word. Very little was said about that. They
Speaker 5: had no problem showing up in black as SUVs to
Speaker 5: arrest her and her sister spent a year and a
Speaker 5: half in jail, and she was just recently pardoned by
Speaker 5: President Trump and all of a sudden, this woman who's.
Speaker 2: No But let me ask you, if does it justify
Speaker 2: the excesses of the Biden administration by matching them with
Speaker 2: excesses by the Trump administration? Is that a good? Look?
Speaker 5: Yeah? I just don't think it's excessive in light of
Speaker 5: Boston is a sanctuary city. We the nine to eleven
Speaker 5: guys who are here, the Boston Marathon, bambers are here.
Speaker 5: A city's been attacked. We're in a very dangerous time
Speaker 5: right now, and we don't need people here being sympathetic
Speaker 5: to groups that are they're terrorists or very to our country.
Speaker 5: We're our scheduls in grave danger.
Speaker 2: Right But look, I understand that I understand that John.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying is I would like to spend whatever
Speaker 2: resources we have to spend if you want to go
Speaker 2: after this woman who wrote an op ed piece in
Speaker 2: the who probably was read by five thousand people max.
Speaker 2: Five thousand and one, now that I've read it, it
Speaker 2: just you're you're spending important political capital. Get the terrorists out,
Speaker 2: get the gang members out, get them, get the convicted
Speaker 2: criminals out, Let the self deportation go. Then you can
Speaker 2: focus on these other ones. In my opinion, as always,
Speaker 2: I'm running out of time, so I gotta let you run.
Speaker 5: I gotta let you money from all right, thanks much,
Speaker 5: talk to you soon.
Speaker 2: All right, done for the night, Rob Brooks, great job,
Speaker 2: I'm reade, a great job. To the calls. We have
Speaker 2: some good calls tonight. We'll have We'll have them. Jim
Speaker 2: Roosevelt on tomorrow night, will continue our social security conversation.
Speaker 2: I'll end us always, all dogs, all cats, all pets
Speaker 2: go to heaven. That's my pell. Charlie Ray, who passed
Speaker 2: fifteen years ago in February, that's where all your pets
Speaker 2: are who have passed. They loved you and you love them.
Speaker 2: I do believe you'll see them again. I'll see you
Speaker 2: in April, every one. In about two minutes, it will
Speaker 2: be April. We're out of March almost in April. Have
Speaker 2: a great Tuesday everyone, see tomorrow night. I'll see you
Speaker 2: on Facebook in about two minutes