Speaker 1: Would you like to see funning with things that don't
Speaker 1: make sense? Hold on, oh a little too much? Okay,
Speaker 1: watch the cololor of my face? Hey oh hey, right,
Speaker 1: exactly all right, so we are back and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I had to take care of some stuff today. There
Speaker 1: was a slight issue with not my alarm clock. I
Speaker 1: usually wake up around the well's okay, let's just go
Speaker 1: with every forty minutes to an hour all night long.
Speaker 1: But when it gets closer to the time where I
Speaker 1: would have to get up, that's when I sleep the most.
Speaker 1: So that's that's always just the thing. But Rebecca's alarm
Speaker 1: and then I don't know if I didn't actually see this,
Speaker 1: This is what she says. She says that she had
Speaker 1: a note offic on her phone telling her that there
Speaker 1: was some sort of error with her alarm. So if
Speaker 1: the phone knows that there was an error with the alarm,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't it make a noise to notify you of that.
Speaker 1: So it would kind of be like a backup in
Speaker 1: the same effact. Whatever. So she got up late, got
Speaker 1: to get the kids ready, I brought Elijah to the school,
Speaker 1: and then when I got back, I got into doing
Speaker 1: another stuff. So we just did this later. I don't
Speaker 1: want to. I hate getting the If I'm not going
Speaker 1: to do this this show right when I have it
Speaker 1: going at eight, then it puts everything else way way
Speaker 1: out of whack for the rest of the day, and
Speaker 1: I don't get enough enough done to my standards. So
Speaker 1: I got everything done first except for putting the OS
Speaker 1: on this computer. Because I have a couple of questions.
Speaker 1: I was told away a magical way, a cheety way
Speaker 1: that will get Windows eleven on there. And then there's
Speaker 1: this other thing that I tried doing on my laptop
Speaker 1: that didn't work because you can't run it as admin.
Speaker 1: It's not possible. Doesn't give you that option to make
Speaker 1: And I don't know if i'd even want this. The
Speaker 1: XP like skin or like you know, format on Windows eleven,
Speaker 1: it like changes it so that you can find shit.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I even want that. I mean,
Speaker 1: it sucks to use Windows eleven. But yeah, I think
Speaker 1: XP kind of sucked too, be quite honest with you,
Speaker 1: there there was a someplace in been middle there. Seven sucked,
Speaker 1: eight sucked. They all suck. But let's take a look
Speaker 1: at so Okay, I need to address something else because
Speaker 1: this is just the thing why because I well, of
Speaker 1: course I'm not going to address things that are non problems,
Speaker 1: so I'm only get to address the things that are problems,
Speaker 1: or the things that irritate me, or the things that
Speaker 1: are offensive and fucked up and not appropriate. So I
Speaker 1: don't really have a lot of tolerance. I think that.
Speaker 1: I think it's negative tolerance. I got two more subscribers
Speaker 1: over here. Well, I told you people not to fucking
Speaker 1: subscribe over here. Anyway, I've already done away with the
Speaker 1: son of a bitch. But on this moon colt one
Speaker 1: it said same old information, nothing new, all regurgitated bullshit.
Speaker 1: I'm like, uh yeah, maybe in the video, but it's
Speaker 1: a commentary, isn't how many people will see the connection
Speaker 1: between the misshapen fucking history that originates out of sumer
Speaker 1: with us like that, and how that applies here. That's
Speaker 1: not so Obviously the person watched two to three minutes
Speaker 1: and then decided he was gonna make a judgment on
Speaker 1: the entire video, or it's a bot trying to steer
Speaker 1: people away from watching the video because they see the
Speaker 1: comment they're like, well, fuck this, I'm gonna go watch
Speaker 1: something else, you know, So there you go. But that's
Speaker 1: on bit shoot and I didn't even show you what
Speaker 1: else looking at, so it doesn't do it through your mind.
Speaker 1: You have to actually press buttons. This is another one
Speaker 1: of those things that I hope is fixed when we
Speaker 1: get into the metaverse. I just think it and there
Speaker 1: it appears. I think, you know, true natural realm. That's
Speaker 1: how it was because I bump into solid objects a lot,
Speaker 1: trying to round corners and get out of door spaces
Speaker 1: and shit like that, and it always makes me think, man, this, uh,
Speaker 1: this this, what do you call it? What is the word? This?
Speaker 1: This material world does a prison? We're used to not
Speaker 1: having to worry about that stuff. All right, So here
Speaker 1: you go. This I popped up earlier. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: put this up here just because there's a so you
Speaker 1: see this, get out here. You see this picture, and
Speaker 1: I think she's looking at the mirror. I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: that's what's going on. Or she's like, who's that asshole
Speaker 1: with the camera? And maybe that's curious to her, but
Speaker 1: I don't think she's checking me out. But it's what
Speaker 1: everybody in the comment said. And let's see if I
Speaker 1: can find him. Oh, it's ky of the go bro.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, no, First, Kaija says that kaij which is
Speaker 1: an awesome name by the way, from you know, the
Speaker 1: Usual Suspects movie. Dude, at four seconds that girl was
Speaker 1: checking you out. You should see it for sexual harassment,
Speaker 1: he says, these thirsty brides, I tell you, oh oh yeah.
Speaker 1: Then he talks about yeah yeah, yeah, okay, so that's cool,
Speaker 1: that's just funny. But Brian guy would go pro fishing
Speaker 1: shows on bitshu and YouTube and uh, there was one
Speaker 1: other thing, but you can this is the same person
Speaker 1: they're saying is like and I don't think that's the part,
Speaker 1: but there is a part of what it looks actually,
Speaker 1: but I think there's a mirrorma in front of me,
Speaker 1: So who's a stay, She's not just looking at her
Speaker 1: her workout right, everybody, come on, drop drop the drop
Speaker 1: the Hubris. But I appreciate the compliment. But the other
Speaker 1: guy who said, you know, this is all bullshit probably
Speaker 1: didn't watch enough of it to understand that I was
Speaker 1: commenting on it. He just wanted to shit on it.
Speaker 1: And that's why I think a lot of times, especially
Speaker 1: at Bishue, they're loaded with bots that just say a
Speaker 1: bunch of horrible shit to stop you from saying anything.
Speaker 1: So that's just the thing that you deal with on BISHU.
Speaker 1: Why did I put these up here?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Why not? Why the hell not? You can see the
Speaker 1: sporadicness of it, like, I don't know, I don't know
Speaker 1: what that is. Again, I can't get rid of it.
Speaker 1: But three weeks, three weeks, seventeen hours, sixteen hours, eleven hours.
Speaker 1: But before that we're like in like two months, five
Speaker 1: months and ten months, so it's not like I in
Speaker 1: a year. This was a good one, by the way.
Speaker 1: Oh where did I go? Doctor? Not so much the
Speaker 1: doctor artists part, but talking about Joe Linder Linder l
Speaker 1: I d n e r l I n d an year. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so there's stuff in there, there's things. All right, we're
Speaker 1: done with that. Took away my thing? Oh that's inscribed?
Speaker 1: Why is it up on that? Oh right, right right,
Speaker 1: But that's been up there for a while, like since
Speaker 1: I was writing my book. The worst one's window is
Speaker 1: m E. Remember that thing that they did. They were
Speaker 1: trying to like, uh they called it mohave, but it
Speaker 1: was a fucking scam. They were just saying, like you know,
Speaker 1: they wanted to rename something without changing anything because everybody
Speaker 1: had like a really bad experience with it, so they
Speaker 1: came out with this idea like mohave, which is the
Speaker 1: desert right next to me, and uh, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: that's where I'm gonna start filming some stuff because it
Speaker 1: looks like you're in tattooing, like literally, like if I
Speaker 1: had a lightsaber toy and uh something that floated like
Speaker 1: a you know it, just like I was in the
Speaker 1: Return of the Jedi. But I'm gonna I'm gonna do
Speaker 1: some video over there to try to get eyeballs on
Speaker 1: and I'm not It's not what I was doing. I
Speaker 1: was like, Okay, is it better if I go like
Speaker 1: this or like like this, eye popping right, people looking
Speaker 1: at stuff? Enough for the fucking hand jau everybody, this
Speaker 1: thing is cutting out like a mofo. Though, I gotta
Speaker 1: watch myself. Let's get over here real quick and then
Speaker 1: I'll get into this topic. So the reason why I
Speaker 1: even addressed that thing on issues because guess what, I
Speaker 1: liked that channel for generic information and I'm gonna probably
Speaker 1: use it today but the Mooney's Goonies and demonalogy, and
Speaker 1: of course I will disagree just like I did yesterday
Speaker 1: on a lot of the topics that they say, like
Speaker 1: that purple haze thing, I think is absolute and total
Speaker 1: bolt right, Like, there's multiple explanations for that. The first
Speaker 1: thing is that there was no golden everything's flipped around.
Speaker 1: The Golden Age was when the goss got rid of
Speaker 1: these pieces of crap. I just came over to FTJ
Speaker 1: Media just to see what was up here, just saying, Hi,
Speaker 1: I mean, as we'll drop this in here for the
Speaker 1: hell of it. There you go, okay, and we're on
Speaker 1: not on kick to this this time. I screwed up yesterday.
Speaker 1: Apparently I grabbed kick and Twitter and I was like,
Speaker 1: what's going on? Well FTJ? Because I was retarded, I
Speaker 1: just clicked the wrong one. But yeah, so now we're back.
Speaker 1: I was really hoping that the thing would go live
Speaker 1: on FTJ because it's kind of a whole point why
Speaker 1: come on at all? But yeah, okay, So what I
Speaker 1: was gonna say about this Golden Age thing is an
Speaker 1: inverted backward did bullshit? You have to ask yourself Golden
Speaker 1: Age for whom like it's a wonderful time for like
Speaker 1: to just think about it this and in present day terms,
Speaker 1: is it a wonderful time for the elitists who own
Speaker 1: everything anyway, in their time of abundance and peace. So
Speaker 1: what does that mean. That means that the majority of
Speaker 1: the people are in subjugation, poor and destitute and not
Speaker 1: having a very good time. So it's a golden age
Speaker 1: according to what group of people, right, So this golden age,
Speaker 1: but in this in this case, they pretend that there
Speaker 1: was a golden age for these Semitic fucks, and it's not.
Speaker 1: They got their ass destroyed because they were doing horrific things.
Speaker 1: Gothic norsemen came to settle that score and after that
Speaker 1: the liberation of the people that they were tormenting for
Speaker 1: however long, were very ingratiated to the Goths and were
Speaker 1: happy to be you know, led in a peaceful way,
Speaker 1: fair way, just like anyone else who has, like, you know,
Speaker 1: the hierarchy. It wasn't because they were subjugated and licking
Speaker 1: boots or anything. It's just no, they were appreciative to
Speaker 1: have a strong leadership, right, So they they were happy
Speaker 1: for a great period of time before more garbage happened
Speaker 1: and corruption and invasions and stuff like that. But that
Speaker 1: wasn't the calde's who are these now fake these people
Speaker 1: pretending to be this magical Hebrew group, and when we
Speaker 1: know that tribe of Dan was actually Gothic as well.
Speaker 1: And uh yeah, so everything that they say is the
Speaker 1: claim of somebody else's stuff. They don't have any accolades
Speaker 1: to mention. But they wanted to compete. They needed to
Speaker 1: compete with Greek. They need when they were taught Greek.
Speaker 1: It's like an envious seferiority complex, inferiority complex. But also
Speaker 1: if you're gonna try to steer everybody and control them,
Speaker 1: you got to at least appear to be superior, right,
Speaker 1: And that's what these cultic fuckers did. First with Saturn.
Speaker 1: Then it was the moon, and then you know, here
Speaker 1: we are pretending that there's Abrahamic religion when there's still
Speaker 1: a Saturn cult. All the same attributes, all the same
Speaker 1: all the same things that they do. So anyway, what
Speaker 1: was I going on about that for?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, so this purple haze thing, I don't buy it.
Speaker 1: I don't buy that there was a Saturn was here
Speaker 1: and there was barely a sun, and it changed spots
Speaker 1: with it and knocked it out of orbit and got closer,
Speaker 1: and it's fucking that's again, horses before Zebras. Everybody horses
Speaker 1: before fucking Zebras. The other part is that they don't
Speaker 1: tell the truth about anything, and there was no writing
Speaker 1: back then, So what are we what are we basing
Speaker 1: any of this on? There was taller trees, What does
Speaker 1: that mean? What does that mean? That couldn't have happened
Speaker 1: with it just a different climate, higher humidity. Oh man,
Speaker 1: it's just kind of stupid. It's kind of stupid to
Speaker 1: go out that far in the deep end. And I'm
Speaker 1: reading this book that I I honestly, if I find
Speaker 1: the author, I'm going to beat him near death to
Speaker 1: get my three dollars that I that I wasted on
Speaker 1: the book back in one way shape or for another.
Speaker 1: And it is called the book is called I'll tell you,
Speaker 1: and it's it's more of the same ship, right, come on,
Speaker 1: bring it back the Saturn death Cult. Now I read it,
Speaker 1: get back. I read a sample and I disagreed with everything.
Speaker 1: But then I was reading some of the chapter headings,
Speaker 1: I'm like, Okay, well, maybe they can't screw this up
Speaker 1: too much because the whole thing is like conjecture and
Speaker 1: hearsay for the first so many pages of the book
Speaker 1: when they try to establish this fake history of cataclysmic events,
Speaker 1: not saying cataclysmic events don't occur. So I'm saying this
Speaker 1: whole idea of the freaking celestial cosmos planetary bullshit that
Speaker 1: nobody can fucking ever verify. Ever, it can't be verified,
Speaker 1: so why are we talking about it? And there's mistakes
Speaker 1: made all throughout it. And then he talks about this
Speaker 1: fucking Golden age again, and it's like Golden Age for
Speaker 1: fucking who, And it's almost like an apologetic way of explaining, like, oh,
Speaker 1: then we had to have weights and measures and all
Speaker 1: this other stuff. It's like, no, you didn't have to
Speaker 1: have that, and an honest society you don't need to
Speaker 1: hold people to a weights and measures. Because they are like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that feels about right. We good, we good, cool, fist bump,
Speaker 1: let's go. That's it. We don't need any of this
Speaker 1: other nonsense. We don't need a million trillion laws and
Speaker 1: all these other you know, restrictions. This is this is
Speaker 1: the federal you know talm Wittick mind that that has
Speaker 1: had play here and he's justifying it, saying, oh, though
Speaker 1: they were scared about the cataclysm, that I just made
Speaker 1: up and you know, out of my out of my
Speaker 1: ass and uh, you know, because other people have talked
Speaker 1: about it, so therefore it must be true.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So, so the the assumption here is that there was
Speaker 1: a purple haze and apparently Prince was singing and playing
Speaker 1: his guitar. You know. However, many thousands of years ago,
Speaker 1: and then all of a sudden there was some upheaval
Speaker 1: and the fixed place of Saturn got really hot and
Speaker 1: got red, and then it got bright, and then it
Speaker 1: blew away like a balloon, and then our son appeared.
Speaker 1: And so either the and apparently one of Saturn's nine
Speaker 1: or seven moons that still again, nobody can verify any
Speaker 1: of this shit apparently became ours convenient. How everything just
Speaker 1: kind of sets itself back into place, right so that
Speaker 1: there's no elect you know, upheaval gravitation wise and just
Speaker 1: throws us off into a glitter you know, bliteration or
Speaker 1: smashes us into anything. Now, everything's good, lucky, yess. That's
Speaker 1: assuming that these are all balls in the first place,
Speaker 1: and not a realm Okay, So I have a lot
Speaker 1: of problems with this whole theory. You know, some of
Speaker 1: the experiences that I've gone through makes me realize that
Speaker 1: there is no reason for other places because other places
Speaker 1: can happen right on the same place and they wouldn't
Speaker 1: even interact and know each other because of It's like
Speaker 1: being it's like you need one radio to tune to
Speaker 1: all these other stations, right, you just need one radio.
Speaker 1: You don't need a different radio for each station. So
Speaker 1: if you turn to the tuna just right way you're
Speaker 1: supposed to, you don't You don't hear the other station
Speaker 1: at all. You hear the station you're on. It's only
Speaker 1: when you're halfway between one and the other that you
Speaker 1: kind of get both right. And that's kind of how
Speaker 1: this whole, this whole material world works. Like I was
Speaker 1: stuck between two stations once and I sensed two different
Speaker 1: things happening at the same time. So it's it's one
Speaker 1: of those indicators that maybe we don't need a different realm,
Speaker 1: they don't need extra space, and the law of conservation
Speaker 1: of unit verse would dictate that there's no extra shit made.
Speaker 1: And let's get back to us. And speaking of which
Speaker 1: made me think about this, if their god, these fuckers, right,
Speaker 1: if their their god is the god or the creator God.
Speaker 1: Why is it a requisite for all of us to
Speaker 1: have something that we are created with be chopped off
Speaker 1: in order to be in adherence to their fucking God
Speaker 1: that they that they sold to us, that they marketed
Speaker 1: to us. Why do we have to be clipped? No
Speaker 1: creator in our creator endowed? Right they clip it off?
Speaker 1: Now you're not endowed anymore, see what I mean? Why
Speaker 1: would that be a thing? Why would you have to
Speaker 1: augment yourself in every other place? They say your body
Speaker 1: is a temple blah blah blah, but you know, still
Speaker 1: clipped the dick and the buzzums do it to females,
Speaker 1: there's there's a female circumcision. Is it because of that
Speaker 1: that skythe or scythe of freaking Saturn is just that
Speaker 1: thirsty for baby blood? Or is it an excuse to
Speaker 1: wound mutilated child so you can suck it's penis. I
Speaker 1: don't know, but that happens too with a little bit
Speaker 1: of wine to get in the mood. Jesus Christ, there's
Speaker 1: no redeeming qualities whatsoever, not, not that I'm looking for
Speaker 1: any anymore. It's kind of that point. It is kind
Speaker 1: of pointless, Like the harets ones are non Talmudic. Okay,
Speaker 1: they're not. They're not rabbinical. Okay, there's enough ship in
Speaker 1: the Torah that's just as bad. And they still have
Speaker 1: a supremacy issue. And the ones that are neither and
Speaker 1: they're atheist, oh look, they would become the psychopathic Zionists.
Speaker 1: Hmmm hmm. And if they're neither of those, which they
Speaker 1: actually are, because that no matter what you know Frank
Speaker 1: said about him being an anti Talmudist and burning books
Speaker 1: and all that shit, if you read the Talmud and
Speaker 1: then you look at what the Franks practiced, it would
Speaker 1: be like, yeah, except for all these stupid rules that
Speaker 1: are like they're not praising God every time they take
Speaker 1: a shit for to thank you, thank you God forgiving
Speaker 1: me holes. That's literally a thing that's really Do you
Speaker 1: want me to read it to you here? Yeah, let's
Speaker 1: do that. This is this is the religion that's in
Speaker 1: control of the world because we're so weak. Right, let
Speaker 1: me see if I can find it you and I
Speaker 1: would say, I'd shit you not, but that's it. The
Speaker 1: puns would just be too too much. Uh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: I'm getting there. Okay. So the rabbis want to murder
Speaker 1: and destroy the am haaretz did judex who reject the
Speaker 1: oral law traditions of the elders, which is you know
Speaker 1: that would actually go kabbala Zohar right same and then
Speaker 1: also the Talmud, and then you have the care writs
Speaker 1: that we talked about too, which would kind of fall
Speaker 1: in the same kind of category. We see this as
Speaker 1: we see this in their praise for their agents. Listen
Speaker 1: to this shit. This is a statement like as if
Speaker 1: it's real or true. This is why I can't read
Speaker 1: any of these fucking books. This one is another, a
Speaker 1: whole different book. But every book that I've read is
Speaker 1: so fucking wrong that it's so insulting that I won't
Speaker 1: poison my brain with this stuff anymore. I've read too
Speaker 1: many books to the point now where I know when
Speaker 1: something's trying to uh syop or lie or misdirect, and
Speaker 1: I just won't put up with it anymore. So now
Speaker 1: I'm on the elliptical steering at the freaking walls because
Speaker 1: I can't. I start reading something and I'm like, Nope,
Speaker 1: that's that completely dis you know, disqualified it for a waste,
Speaker 1: you know, for for that's not gonna be allowed to
Speaker 1: waste my time. So this is what they say. This
Speaker 1: is what they say. We see this in their praise
Speaker 1: for their agent. Now this is gonna make a lot
Speaker 1: of people mad. I'm not stating this. Just hear what
Speaker 1: they're saying for their agent, Hitler, who they hail as
Speaker 1: the avenging angel who executed the Judaic sinners who had
Speaker 1: rejected the authority of the Talmud. So God, So that's
Speaker 1: what this is what they're saying, this mental problem that
Speaker 1: they have, they're they're just gonna go ahead and assume
Speaker 1: that first of all, Jeremy didn't do what they said
Speaker 1: they did, but secondly that he went around and just said,
Speaker 1: are you Talmudic or not? Okay, you're You're gonna have
Speaker 1: to call with me if you're if you're, if you're
Speaker 1: not following the rabbis. The fuck is that that? This
Speaker 1: is all like pocus pocus bullshit. Here who executed the
Speaker 1: Judaic sinners who had rejected the authority of the Talmud.
Speaker 1: The majority of the Judaics of Germany were along with
Speaker 1: these lines. Along these lines, Yehudah Bauer, writing in the
Speaker 1: Israeli newspaper Aretz, the panel discussion on Harridan and the
Speaker 1: Holocaust that recently aired on television Channel one should have
Speaker 1: included the view of the lubavictor Rebbe or Rabbi Shabbad
Speaker 1: so called King Messiah, Rabbi Menechem Schneerson. Isn't this the
Speaker 1: same fuck that Trump was just at the at the
Speaker 1: crave sight of with Shapiro and the other scumbag murdering
Speaker 1: son of a bitch eugenicist who wants to put chips
Speaker 1: in your head. Elon Musk, I think that was anyway.
Speaker 1: On the subject of the Holocaust, Rebbe compares God to
Speaker 1: a surgeon who amputates his a patient's limb in order
Speaker 1: to save his life. The limb is incurably diseased. The
Speaker 1: Holy One blessed be He, like the professor surgeon, seeks
Speaker 1: the good of it is. And indeed all he, all
Speaker 1: he does, is done for the old. On where to go?
Speaker 1: I thought there was more? Oh? Yeah, here it is.
Speaker 1: All he's done is done for the good. In the
Speaker 1: spiritual sense, no harm was done, because the everlasting spirit
Speaker 1: of the Jewish people was not destroyed. They just they
Speaker 1: just got rid of the garbage. You see, the ones
Speaker 1: that didn't follow the fucking Sanhedron in the cajal, the
Speaker 1: ones that didn't follow the rabbis around and licked their
Speaker 1: boots the rebbe or rabbi, but they they spell rbb stands. Therefore,
Speaker 1: it is clear the Holocaust was a So this is
Speaker 1: a rabbi's the Holocaust, which never happened anyway, But it's
Speaker 1: a lie, I'm compounded on a lot of another lie.
Speaker 1: Is clear the Holocaust was a good thing because it
Speaker 1: lopped off a diseased ravage limb of the Jewish people.
Speaker 1: In other words, the millions who perished in the Holocaust,
Speaker 1: that what the fuck where they getting these fucking numbers again?
Speaker 1: In order to cleanse the Jewish people of its sins.
Speaker 1: So the Allies who pinned this on the Germans who
Speaker 1: bombed the shit out of Germany and made it so
Speaker 1: that people starved to death and that disease ran rampid
Speaker 1: because there was nothing to treat people with, and also
Speaker 1: allowing the Red Cross in the freaking inject people with
Speaker 1: god knows what, and those, you know, just to kind
Speaker 1: of further that along. They got their body count, they
Speaker 1: got a little bit of it, then they just embellished
Speaker 1: the rest, which is also kind of funny because come
Speaker 1: to find out, in nineteen twenty three there was a
Speaker 1: libel suit. I don't know if someone can have to
Speaker 1: verify this for me, but there was a libel suit
Speaker 1: with some sort of publication that was claiming that Hitler
Speaker 1: and his party was taking money from the Jews and
Speaker 1: some and Henry Ford. And this is ninety twenty three,
Speaker 1: It is ten years before he got into like you know,
Speaker 1: where he was, and that he received a ruling for
Speaker 1: six million mark marks. So was it a mark per
Speaker 1: jew that they converted that to for saying how many
Speaker 1: were killed? Or is it because of the kabbola and
Speaker 1: the missing letter that they said, okay that and represents
Speaker 1: six million? Anyway, the rabbi stance. Therefore, it is cleared
Speaker 1: the Holocaust was a good thing because it lopped off
Speaker 1: the disease ravage limb of the Jewish people, in other words,
Speaker 1: the millions of perish who that actually happened in the
Speaker 1: Holocaust in order to cleanse the Jewish people of it
Speaker 1: sins uh, you know. And this is Sheika Grossman, a
Speaker 1: leader of the underground and Thelice Bielist, Oh, oh my god,
Speaker 1: Bile East Talk Bilist Talk Ghetto who survived survived very
Speaker 1: dramatic the war. Yeah, maybe from the bombing. Published an
Speaker 1: article in Hamish Hamishmer newspaper on August twenty second, nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty Quinny Schneerson and expressing her profound shock at his
Speaker 1: words on August twenty eighth, my birthday nineteen eighty not
Speaker 1: my birthday. I was born in Europe before that. The
Speaker 1: rebbe a rabbi, but it's Rebbie, solid of spelling it,
Speaker 1: sent her a reply on his personal stationary letter. Apparently
Speaker 1: typerend contains a number of corrections in his own handwriting.
Speaker 1: Schneerson's own handwriting. Everybody, how wonderful. It's like getting a's
Speaker 1: like getting a dildo from Schmouley. It's so official. He
Speaker 1: signs the dildo for you, you know, and and is
Speaker 1: signed by him. Next some words or said there all
Speaker 1: right in it? The rabbi confirms everything in the published
Speaker 1: text his remarks, Sneerson explained, where based on the Torah,
Speaker 1: of course they are. Hitler was a mess of God.
Speaker 1: That's true, but look at what they do to it
Speaker 1: right this well, the surgery he spoke of was such
Speaker 1: a massive corrective procedure that the suffering was minor. Compared
Speaker 1: to its curative effect. These are These are your if
Speaker 1: you're out there and you're you know, teetering on the
Speaker 1: whole Jewish question, or if you are one of them.
Speaker 1: This is what they say. Well, first of all, you
Speaker 1: have to also wrap your head around the whole idea
Speaker 1: that it didn't go down the way they say it did.
Speaker 1: But even if it did, and that's what they want
Speaker 1: you to believe, to then say the shit like this
Speaker 1: is fucking fucked up. You wouldn't want to be following
Speaker 1: those people around anymore. That's all I gotta say about that. Now,
Speaker 1: let's see if I can find the crap one. Did
Speaker 1: I not copy that one? Oh? Wait, it's done? This one,
Speaker 1: I think, just gotta find it. It's here. This is
Speaker 1: a literal thing. No here it is. Judaism celebrates the
Speaker 1: body to such a sordid extent that it because they're materialists, right,
Speaker 1: there's nothing after this for them, because this is there's
Speaker 1: nothing here for them. Really, if they didn't create their
Speaker 1: own artificial world within this one and set limitations, and
Speaker 1: how do you do that? Make people dependent on a
Speaker 1: false currency or money at all? Money isn't necessary if
Speaker 1: you have a full community of people who want to
Speaker 1: have prosperity and things that will help benefit the whole community.
Speaker 1: They will support that. It wouldn't be like a price
Speaker 1: on things, like you needed wood and nails to accomplish
Speaker 1: the task that everybody's gonna benefit from. They're not gonna
Speaker 1: be like, well, sorry, you're not gonna be able to
Speaker 1: do that because you don't have enough money for them
Speaker 1: to hammer it like that is. It's kind of productive,
Speaker 1: right if everybody's working towards the same goal, which is
Speaker 1: the betterment of everybody around them and strength in their community.
Speaker 1: Number One, everybody would be armed because they would have
Speaker 1: faith in each other to be their own police force.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't need a police force, they wouldn't need a military.
Speaker 1: They would be their military when a time came to
Speaker 1: when it was necessary, and they would train. And this
Speaker 1: all did happen back in New Orlando days. But anyhow,
Speaker 1: but when a country or the people who are who
Speaker 1: have co opted and infiltrated it are at odds or
Speaker 1: war with the people who they've already confirmed through many documents,
Speaker 1: or enemy combatants according to them of the IMF Federal Reserve,
Speaker 1: then of course they don't want you to be armed
Speaker 1: because you're the target. They're not doing anything to benefit you.
Speaker 1: They don't want you to be strong. And there's the
Speaker 1: difference if you're if any other government, would make no
Speaker 1: sense for the people not to want it, for the
Speaker 1: for the hierarchy, the monarchy, the leadership not to want
Speaker 1: the people to be armed. It makes the stronger nation
Speaker 1: if you care about the nation. But if you don't
Speaker 1: and you're and you're there to sabotage it, then obviously
Speaker 1: the opposite is true. Okay. So, Judaism celebrates the body
Speaker 1: to such a sort of extent that it even has
Speaker 1: a defication prayer which every Jewish male is commanded to
Speaker 1: recite every time he relieves himself. Do you want to
Speaker 1: hear it? Okay, Well, I don't really want to say
Speaker 1: it because I feel like every time there's a spelling
Speaker 1: or a word or a frequency, you're kind of cursing
Speaker 1: yourself at the same time, because then it's been, it's been,
Speaker 1: it's resonated through you now. But I'll do it. Blessed
Speaker 1: art Thou, o Lord, who has made the human in
Speaker 1: its orifices and holes. You have to say that every
Speaker 1: time you take a shit in order to be you
Speaker 1: know in it a good little uh followed the talmud
Speaker 1: of the rabbi. Everything about Judaism, and I'm reading more
Speaker 1: everything about Judaism is either a distortion or a falsification
Speaker 1: of the Old Testament, because Judaism is based and they're
Speaker 1: using the Old again. They wrote the fucking thing and
Speaker 1: then they interpreted it the way they wanted to to
Speaker 1: change the rules for themselves, all right, and they weren't
Speaker 1: happy with just a helmet. They also had to go
Speaker 1: branch off into the further mysticism and hookas pocus nonsense
Speaker 1: and come up with not only the Zohar, but then
Speaker 1: the Lurian Kabbala give themselves something to do. We're on
Speaker 1: a mission. We have to alter the way the course
Speaker 1: of the earth is going and make it corrupt. They
Speaker 1: didn't perverse so that we can bring back our Messiah
Speaker 1: of death. And then we got ju We we got
Speaker 1: Zionism out of that one. Aren't we lucky? Everything about
Speaker 1: Judaism as away I said that, okay, so based on
Speaker 1: a man made tradition that that voids the Old Testament
Speaker 1: by means of a series of dispensations and loopholes, dispensationalists
Speaker 1: out there. You know that that's Frankism, right, I hope
Speaker 1: so all the brethrens that's where Christian Zionism comes from.
Speaker 1: Even if you say I'm dispensationalists, but I'm not a Zionist. Okay,
Speaker 1: you still think that you have to help them when
Speaker 1: they come to terms and they have the times of
Speaker 1: Jacob's struggle. Shut up, shut up, these beginning with the Mishnah,
Speaker 1: which represents Okay, So here's another whole part of it.
Speaker 1: Here says the American system of jurisprudence has degenerated from
Speaker 1: courts that ruled according to God's law to courts that
Speaker 1: make the law through judicial interpretation and case law precedent.
Speaker 1: So what they said prior to this is the Anglo
Speaker 1: Saxon jurisprudence and common law. And they they they've turned
Speaker 1: their back again on that common law caused no harm.
Speaker 1: And obviously the Constitution and what it says law is laws, right,
Speaker 1: it says in embraced, and now we embrace the Talmudic
Speaker 1: law of big brother bureaucracy. And with their with their
Speaker 1: claim here is that this type of system is what
Speaker 1: the talmud, it's it's representative, and it's a it's an
Speaker 1: evidence that the Talmud is what's being followed here and
Speaker 1: who who's actually putting it into place because of the
Speaker 1: multitude of these these laws and how they're the same
Speaker 1: way that they treated the Talmud with the Torah is
Speaker 1: how they treat our legal system. And that's really what
Speaker 1: Brandeis was doing too. So it makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: So American, the American Jews system. You know, I heard
Speaker 1: that the say make the law through judicial interpretation and
Speaker 1: case law precedent rather than through God's law. At the
Speaker 1: courts make the law through judicial interpretation in case law President,
Speaker 1: the latter is entirely talmudic and reflects the subversion of
Speaker 1: our nation. The growth of Talmotic law in all its
Speaker 1: aspects was, for the most part of the work of
Speaker 1: judicial interpretation rather than a form of rather than a
Speaker 1: formal legislation. Oh here's a little something too. This is
Speaker 1: going to be cut off. It's kind of going to
Speaker 1: get to the point, though it says the reader is
Speaker 1: given the distinct impression that modern judaism this is commenting
Speaker 1: on something that something someone else wrote prior to this.
Speaker 1: But you don't even really need that to make this
Speaker 1: make sense, It says the reader is given the distinct
Speaker 1: impression that modern Judaism bears within it the seeds of
Speaker 1: the religion of the Old Testament is that it is
Speaker 1: the Old Testament religion without Christ. That's probably how most
Speaker 1: people think about it, right. Nothing could be further from
Speaker 1: the truth. Nothing could be a greater source of delusion
Speaker 1: to ascribe to the ancient Israelite religion. The term Judaism
Speaker 1: is a grave lexical and hermaneutic error. It gives to
Speaker 1: the creed of the entire twelve tribes of Israel and
Speaker 1: their covenant Eloheim, the title of a perverse, man made
Speaker 1: tradition that flourished among one segment of the offspring of
Speaker 1: the fourth son of the patriarch Jacob blah blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. But there you go, there you go. There's
Speaker 1: some stuff on the druids here. Oh, this is interesting,
Speaker 1: but this is more for a different talk. Some stuff
Speaker 1: about the lies of the trail tears and the over
Speaker 1: exaggeration and the absolute bullshit. They were given money to
Speaker 1: relocate there. It was a land deal and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: not on completely unlike what they're doing. The Palestine where
Speaker 1: they're just bombing the ship out of them and they're
Speaker 1: not allowed to flee anywhere because they're surrounded on all sides.
Speaker 1: So it's not the same, all right, So where are
Speaker 1: we at?
Speaker 2: Then?
Speaker 1: I guess we're gonna venture off into this. I want
Speaker 1: to I want to play a couple of these videos
Speaker 1: because I think they're interesting, And hey, guess what guy
Speaker 1: who says this is the same shit regards they No,
Speaker 1: it wasn't at all, It wasn't. Maybe that video actually,
Speaker 1: you know, I know somebody is very very well versed
Speaker 1: in this stuff, and he was. That was the first
Speaker 1: time he heard of that Purple Hayes Son thing. And
Speaker 1: now I have every time I look at Saturn's that
Speaker 1: is part of what their their folklore is. But not
Speaker 1: everybody's aware of that. So now, what's wrong with actually
Speaker 1: bringing up and have a full conversation instead of trying
Speaker 1: to impress the one fucking person out there who's probably
Speaker 1: about right. And we did go into much deeper detail
Speaker 1: on this. The whole reason why this is a total
Speaker 1: fraud is because we have to consider who really is
Speaker 1: this a golden age for, because in reality, it was
Speaker 1: a golden age for the good people who were done
Speaker 1: with this cult. But it's the same cult people who
Speaker 1: said that they had a golden age and that it
Speaker 1: was ruined. So what was the golden age prior to
Speaker 1: this fake thing that happened with Sadden where everybody was
Speaker 1: in darkness and that they were the ones that were
Speaker 1: ruling and able to, you know, control the minds and
Speaker 1: master the people because they were terrified of their existence,
Speaker 1: so they were able to be more easily influenced and
Speaker 1: abused by these people. Was that their golden age? Is
Speaker 1: that what they want back? Because golden to me looks
Speaker 1: a lot more like the sun than it does a
Speaker 1: purple freaking thing. If we're going to be based on color.
Speaker 1: I know that's not what they were doing, but still
Speaker 1: it's kind of a i mean, elementary way or remedial
Speaker 1: way of looking at that. But still all right, So
Speaker 1: the qutics geek gus the Devil Bible to summon medieval demons.
Speaker 1: I have some interest in that. It's the giant book
Speaker 1: with the devil funny little cartoon drawing in inside of it.
Speaker 1: It's a giant ass thing, right, Who the hell they
Speaker 1: write that for? Who the hell wrote that big ass book?
Speaker 1: And it says they summoned medieval demons. Oopsie, It's like
Speaker 1: it's like listening to people didn't get this joke or
Speaker 1: not this joke, but this reference when I said, we
Speaker 1: read the book and we played the tape. Now we
Speaker 1: can't escape, and now we can't go back. It was
Speaker 1: from evil Dead guys. You know when he plays the
Speaker 1: tape and the guys doing reciting the passages in the
Speaker 1: old language, and then all of a sudden you see
Speaker 1: the the the forests start to move and you see
Speaker 1: the camera thing where they race it towards the cabin. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we we found the book, played the tape. So that's
Speaker 1: kind of like how this is going over here. So
Speaker 1: there's a dude that's right on top of it kind
Speaker 1: of looks like, oh my god, he looks so much
Speaker 1: like he's uh, oh oh, what the hell's his name?
Speaker 1: Oh man, I got a problem the fucking lawyer guy.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, what is wrong with my brain? It's
Speaker 1: in my freaking head. I'm looking at the word in
Speaker 1: my head and it's gone. It's just not it's not computing,
Speaker 1: it's pixelagging in my brain. Oh my god. Why because
Speaker 1: I wanted to say something? Oh, Yeah, I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: be able to type it because it's it's there's not
Speaker 1: enough in there. And I know what, I know what
Speaker 1: the word, I know what I'm trying to say, I
Speaker 1: know what I'm trying to think, but it's just not there.
Speaker 1: It's saying fuck you, Dan job man. Oh, it's killing me. Dershowitz, God,
Speaker 1: damn it. Why was that so hard? The dude looks
Speaker 1: us like Dershowitz on the cover of this. Let me
Speaker 1: go ahead and pick this here. So here's a couple
Speaker 1: options we have here in the comments. You can tell
Speaker 1: me which one you want. I don't care about the
Speaker 1: Hyri biff thing. I've already gone over that in my book,
Speaker 1: The Forbidden Teachings of Isazel.
Speaker 2: Eh.
Speaker 1: But here's one that I think might actually connect a
Speaker 1: little bit more than I would think on the surface
Speaker 1: to the whole saturnth and Mooncolt thing. Because it was
Speaker 1: Saturn moon Colt. This is kind of the order Saturn
Speaker 1: moon Colt and so on, And that does not, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: it does not link credence to Saturn being closer. And
Speaker 1: it was a purple blah blah blah, and there was
Speaker 1: no sun, and that was the Sun and no, no,
Speaker 1: because this very thing that is described in the Edda
Speaker 1: of the of the Liberation and the Sun, the Sun
Speaker 1: worshippers or the Sun I'm sorry, venerators who were monotheistic
Speaker 1: Gothic Aryan people who did conquer these Woden type scumbag
Speaker 1: wolf cult you know, the totem was the wolf and
Speaker 1: the serpent. Those people they were worshiping the son that
Speaker 1: we have now right, there was there was no Saturn
Speaker 1: bullshit going on there and people this is so there's
Speaker 1: so much convolution, and either they misinterpreted stuff or deliberately
Speaker 1: rearranged aspects and put them in the wrong chronology and
Speaker 1: gave them opposing attributes just to make such a mess
Speaker 1: of the history that nobody could ever could ever get
Speaker 1: anything out of it except everybody is corrupt and evil
Speaker 1: and they're and mankindness flawed, as they say, because they
Speaker 1: give they assign us there their attribute, so that we're
Speaker 1: disgusted by everything, and it's not true. There are noble
Speaker 1: people they were. We are when we remember that, we
Speaker 1: don't just you know, shirk our responsibility and live beneath
Speaker 1: our you know, our standards. We still are, but that's
Speaker 1: part of the scam, right, don't expect too much out
Speaker 1: of yourself because we're sinners, so it's okay to do
Speaker 1: that because you're expected to anyway. Yeah, yeah, yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of good stuff in here. Saint Germaine's hidden
Speaker 1: secrets that might be fun for some time. The most
Speaker 1: terrifying love craftying god yog Sothoath. I thought it was
Speaker 1: you a guy. Oh, let's see the demon of Islam. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was feared entities. Nah, I'm not gonna get there,
Speaker 1: all right, So I think I think I've planned other
Speaker 1: ones that we're gonna look at it. So there's the
Speaker 1: I'm trying not to get into too much of this.
Speaker 1: You know, well, it's because it's against the Bible. Therefore
Speaker 1: it's like, dude, you retarded, don't you stop arguing in
Speaker 1: a circle about it. It's like they presented something to
Speaker 1: oppose it, and then like, but they also created that too.
Speaker 1: Get off of all of that shit. Find your own
Speaker 1: culture and find your own history and stop using their
Speaker 1: fucking book again. What is the Kabba Kaba? The truth
Speaker 1: about the mysterious histories of the most sacred place in Islam.
Speaker 1: That's what was the Black Cube, right, that's seventeen minutes.
Speaker 1: And there's a little demon face there. So that's that's
Speaker 1: on the docket. Why Moloch is the most cruel of
Speaker 1: all gods? This is a practis the supreme Arkan? Who
Speaker 1: are the Arkans? That darker rulers? Sort of the astral
Speaker 1: world exploding demonology of the world's most dangerous book in depth. Uh,
Speaker 1: the Hebrew Bible is the most dangerous book. Oh wow, oh, surprise, surprise.
Speaker 1: It's a grim water like I've been saying. Okay, so
Speaker 1: let's start with yeah, okay, three dimensional prison. This is
Speaker 1: a cube, right, wouldn't that be a cube? And I
Speaker 1: think the merkaba or the or the little you know
Speaker 1: with tetragramma, I don't know, whatever the fuck it is,
Speaker 1: called it the shape of the Star of rim Fan
Speaker 1: or whatever the hell you want to call it. Just
Speaker 1: don't call it David because that guy didn't exist. It
Speaker 1: almost looks like it's a perfect, you know, shape to
Speaker 1: in prison one person with their arms outstretched and their
Speaker 1: legs outstretched as if pinned to something like it's harnessing
Speaker 1: your energy, like it's a snowflake that you're stuck inside. Anyway,
Speaker 1: let's start with the Kodex gighis. I'm kind of interested
Speaker 1: in that. And then we'll jump over to King Solomon
Speaker 1: Vampire School. No, not that one. Uh yahway into three
Speaker 1: dimensional prison, the dark Gnostic connection. That sounds a little
Speaker 1: bit like it's going to get back into the whole
Speaker 1: Saturn stuff. All right, let's do it. Let's do it.
Speaker 2: Let's do it.
Speaker 1: And then the mystery behind the Cult of Saturn we
Speaker 1: already watched. All right, so that's that one's already done.
Speaker 1: Mm hmmmm mmmmm. Not a pausive hold on you with me?
Speaker 1: You with me? Shut up? Yay you you over there,
Speaker 1: I'll see you over there in the comments. All right,
Speaker 1: here we go, let's do it. M mmm, let me
Speaker 1: get let me, let me watch something else that I
Speaker 1: can disagree with for a little bit. Oh no, that one.
Speaker 1: There we go, and we'll scree. The devil doesn't come
Speaker 1: to us in red cape and pointy horns. She comes
Speaker 1: as everything you've ever wished for, Tucker Max. Yeah, not
Speaker 1: not with not with whatever the hell else, but with
Speaker 1: a smile, right, a grin the cod And then another
Speaker 1: way to put that is, like, you know, since we're
Speaker 1: in their money system, they're Babylonian bullshit money system that
Speaker 1: would be with lots of promise and riches I have
Speaker 1: to do, and knowing that that's all artificial, you're really
Speaker 1: giving away a lot for nothing, aren't you? Just for
Speaker 1: the material world.
Speaker 2: Codex Gigas, known as the Devil's Bible, is a thirteenth
Speaker 2: century manuscript containing the complete Bible and instructions for summoning
Speaker 2: spirits and performing dark rituals. This video will explore its pages,
Speaker 2: fascinating legends and hidden secrets, from demonic invocations to its
Speaker 2: turbulent history over the centuries. Stay until the end to
Speaker 2: discover the truth behind the terrifying invocations and the shocking
Speaker 2: legacy of this enigmatic book. Origins of the Codex Gigers.
Speaker 2: The Devil's Bible, known as the Codex Gigas, is a
Speaker 2: medieval manuscript that has captured the imagination of historians and
Speaker 2: occult enthusiasts alike.
Speaker 1: But that's the guy who has thought looked like Dershowitz
Speaker 1: a hanging face there.
Speaker 2: But what exactly is this mysterious book and where does
Speaker 2: it come from? This monumental work was created in the
Speaker 2: thirteenth century in the Benedictine Monastery of Podla Zeitch in
Speaker 2: the Czech Republic. It is believed to have been written
Speaker 2: by a monk named Herman the Recluse. According to legend,
Speaker 2: Herman was sentenced to death.
Speaker 1: And you know, that's got to be quite the name
Speaker 1: to have to live up to. And as a child
Speaker 1: like Herman the Recluse goddamn.
Speaker 2: It ma, to save himself made a pact with the devil.
Speaker 2: He promised to write the most extensive book ever seen
Speaker 2: in a single night. In return, the devil would claim
Speaker 2: his soul. The story behind the devil's involvement.
Speaker 1: Well, obviously that's already bullshit. First of all, this completely
Speaker 1: takes out the idea of why was it scaled to
Speaker 1: like a giant size person in the first place, rather
Speaker 1: than to every other book that had been on the
Speaker 1: shelf somewhere. Why was it that enormous? And then also
Speaker 1: how did you write all that, illustrate all that in
Speaker 1: a single night? Was it one of those cosmic nights
Speaker 1: like freakin retired Islam guy, mister Mohammad, were you or
Speaker 1: were you hanging out with Roland from the Gunslinger novel
Speaker 1: where one night ends up being ten years when he
Speaker 1: wakes up.
Speaker 2: Adds an aura of mystery and fear to the manuscript.
Speaker 2: The legend tells that Hermann, unable to complete the task,
Speaker 2: independently invoked Lucifer, who helped finish the manuscript in exchegue, who.
Speaker 1: We have some issues with, by the way, as far
Speaker 1: as what that value is too, because it might be
Speaker 1: completely opposite of what you might think, or what I
Speaker 1: might think, or what we've been taught. But we'll go
Speaker 1: into that a whole lot. It's like, it's like trying
Speaker 1: to discuss the attributes of the uster body and caring
Speaker 1: about it, though at the end of the day, it's like,
Speaker 1: what the is the point right? It's like, oh, no,
Speaker 1: you had it all wrong. Thesbody eats children, or Lucifer
Speaker 1: is the good guys, it doesn't matter because they're not real.
Speaker 2: Change for his soul. This pact is symbolized in a
Speaker 2: chilling illustration of the devil that occupies an entire page
Speaker 2: of the book. The creation of this manuscript is closely
Speaker 2: tied to the Benedictine monastery of Podlasitch. Founded in the
Speaker 2: early twelfth century. This monastery was a religious and scholarly
Speaker 2: activity center. Despite its significance, the monastery faced numerous challenges,
Speaker 2: including political pressures and economic hardships, ultimately leading to its decline.
Speaker 2: The production of such an extensive manuscript within its walls
Speaker 2: is a testament to the dedication and ambition of its monks.
Speaker 2: This medieval book is notable not only for its content,
Speaker 2: but also for its impressive physical characteristics. The book measures
Speaker 2: ninety two centimeters tall and fifty centimeters wide and weighs
Speaker 2: approximately seventy five kilograms. It is made of vellum crafted
Speaker 2: from the skins of over one hundred and sixty animals,
Speaker 2: probably donkeys. This massive size makes it the most extensive
Speaker 2: medieval manuscript known to exist. The sheer scale of the
Speaker 2: manuscript suggests it was intended to be a monumental work,
Speaker 2: possibly to demonstrate the wealth and intellectual prowess of the monastery.
Speaker 2: After its creation, the manuscript had a turbulent journey through history.
Speaker 2: It was initially kept at the monastery of Podlasich, but
Speaker 2: was later moved to the Benedictine Monastery of Brevnov in
Speaker 2: Prague due to invasions and plundering. During the Thirty Years
Speaker 2: War in the seventeenth century, the Swedish Army took the
Speaker 2: book as war booty and transported it to Stockholm, which
Speaker 2: remains in the National Library of Sweden. The origin of
Speaker 2: this manuscript in the thirteenth century and its creation in
Speaker 2: the monastery of Podlasich are as fascinating as the legends
Speaker 2: surrounding it. This monumental manuscript is notable not only for
Speaker 2: its content but also for its impressive physical characteristics. Its
Speaker 2: colossal size and rich history remain an object of fascination
Speaker 2: and mystery. Its diabolic legends, immense size, and varied content
Speaker 2: make it one of the most enigmatic relics of the
Speaker 2: Middle Ages. Content of the Kodex Gigas. After understanding its
Speaker 2: mysterious origin and creation, let's delve into the fascinating contents
Speaker 2: of the Codex Gigas. What unique texts and illustrations are
Speaker 2: found within this monumental manuscript and why is the illustration
Speaker 2: of the devil so significant? The Codex Gigas is impressive
Speaker 2: not only for its size, but also for the variety
Speaker 2: and richness of its content. Among its pages we find
Speaker 2: the complete Bible, historical texts, medical texts, and exorcism rituals.
Speaker 2: One of the most striking elements is the full page
Speaker 2: illustration of the Devil, an image that has contributed to
Speaker 2: its nickname as the Devil's Bible. This illustration stands out
Speaker 2: for its rarity and symbolizes the demonic pact that, according
Speaker 2: to legend, enabled the book's creation. The Codex Gigas contains
Speaker 2: the complete Latin Vulgart Bible, making it a comprehensive religious text.
Speaker 2: This inclusion underscores the manuscript's importance and role as a
Speaker 2: significant religious artifact. The Bible's presence contrasts sharply with the
Speaker 2: darker elements within the same volume, emphasizing the dichotomy of
Speaker 2: the divine and the demonic that defines the Codex Gigers.
Speaker 2: The manuscript includes several historical texts that provide valuable insights
Speaker 2: into the medieval world. These texts include the Chronica Boemorum
Speaker 2: Chronicle of the Bohemians by Cosmos of Prague, which details
Speaker 2: the history of Bohemia up to the twelfth century. This
Speaker 2: chronicle is crucial for understanding the region's history and adds
Speaker 2: a layer of historical context to the Codex Gigers. The
Speaker 2: Codex Gigas contains medical treatises that reveal the scientific knowledge
Speaker 2: and practices of the time. These texts cover various topics,
Speaker 2: including diseases, treatments, and medicinal herbs. Including medical knowledge highlights
Speaker 2: the manuscript's role as a comprehensive resource, combining multiple fields
Speaker 2: of expertise in one place. One of the more intriguing
Speaker 2: aspects of the Codex Gigers is its inclusion of exorcism
Speaker 2: rituals and formulas. These texts reflect the spiritual and supernatural
Speaker 2: beliefs of the medieval period. The detailed instructions for exorcisms
Speaker 2: and protections against evil spirits show the period's emphasis on
Speaker 2: combating demonic forces, further enhancing the manuscript's enigmatic reputation. The
Speaker 2: full page illustration of the devil is arguably the Codex
Speaker 2: Giga's most famous and striking feature. This image is unusual
Speaker 2: for a medieval manuscript, especially one containing sacred texts like
Speaker 2: the Bible. The devil is depicted with large claus, a
Speaker 2: greenish complexion, and a grotesque menacing appearance. According to legend,
Speaker 2: this illustration symbolizes the pact with the devil that enabled
Speaker 2: the manuscript's creation. In addition to the Bible and historical chronicles,
Speaker 2: the Codex Gigas includes a range of theological texts and
Speaker 2: magical formulas. These texts cover various topics, from dream interpretation
Speaker 2: to astrological predictions. This eclectic mix of content demonstrates the
Speaker 2: medieval mindset, where science, religion, and magic often intersected dark
Speaker 2: entities of the book. Now, let's delve into one of
Speaker 2: the darkest and most fascinating aspects of the Codex gigas
Speaker 2: the demonology and dark secrets within its pages. What demons
Speaker 2: are mentioned in this enigmatic mind manuscript and what rituals
Speaker 2: and invocations are described to summon them. The Codex Gigaz
Speaker 2: mentions demons of great power and malice, including blial Asmodius,
Speaker 2: and Leviathan. Each demon has its rituals and invocations meticulously
Speaker 2: detailed in the manuscript, which medieval practitioners believed they could
Speaker 2: use to summon and control these infernal entities.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but wasn't maybe that the whole gag in the
Speaker 1: first place there as something that you can control them
Speaker 1: once you summon them. Is that maybe why if any
Speaker 1: of this curse was of any truth, that would make
Speaker 1: it the evil book in the first place, right, Like
Speaker 1: to convince people that you can mess with these things
Speaker 1: and oh, all's well as long as you put these
Speaker 1: binding spells out it too, right, good luck.
Speaker 2: Bliel is one of the most feared demons of the
Speaker 2: Codex gigas, depicted with a corrupt beauty and yellow serpent eyes.
Speaker 2: He is known for his ability to deceive and corrupt.
Speaker 1: So totally annoyve.
Speaker 2: Bilil is the master of lies and manipulation, so totally annoyve,
Speaker 2: seducing humans with promises of power and wealth.
Speaker 1: So totally annoyve, and also totally a tango because that's
Speaker 1: exactly how they describe them in the Japanese Lawyer too.
Speaker 2: However, his true intention is always the moral and spiritual
Speaker 2: destruction of those under his influence.
Speaker 1: Again, so totally annoyve.
Speaker 2: The texts describe Bilil as an entity that enjoys breaking
Speaker 2: down integrity and virtue, dragging his victims into depravity and
Speaker 2: chaos as much.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna go ahead and just you can just
Speaker 1: insert it every time he makes another statement about the
Speaker 1: attributes of this guy. We're talking about the hues, right,
Speaker 1: We're talking about them straight up. Let's put that guy
Speaker 1: in bodies.
Speaker 2: Modius is a fearsome figure in the demonology of the
Speaker 2: Codex Gigas. He is described with three heads, one of
Speaker 2: a bull, one of a man, and one of a ram,
Speaker 2: and a body covered in scales. As Modius is the
Speaker 2: demon of lust, known for inciting insatiable carnal desires and
Speaker 2: provoking destructive conflicts. His presence is associated with discord and chaos,
Speaker 2: as he enjoys.
Speaker 1: So so that we're discord right, there is discordia. There's
Speaker 1: that a whole weird movement thing that happened. But remember
Speaker 1: remember the variant, the Covid variant. There was a goddess
Speaker 1: of discord who had fourteen children. They were the pestilence
Speaker 1: and of these other different embodiments of war and chaos
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff. And specifically this deity was,
Speaker 1: you know, a predator towards children. So it kind of
Speaker 1: gives it a flare or a flavor of lilith as well.
Speaker 2: Glowing destruction in human relationships and causing ruin and despair.
Speaker 2: The accounts suggest that those seeking Asmodius's favor are often
Speaker 2: consumed by their desires and ambitions, leading them to a
Speaker 2: tragic end. Leviathan, the demon of the sea, is a
Speaker 2: colossal creature with a serpentine form, iridescent scales, and glowing eyes.
Speaker 2: This demon is linked to the destruct forces of the ocean.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm sorry for good, I never told you. Eris
Speaker 1: was the name of the variant and.
Speaker 2: Is known for his ability to unleash storms and shipwrecks.
Speaker 2: The Leviathan symbolizes aquatic chaos and the uncontrollable fury of nature.
Speaker 2: In legends, those who attempt to summon Leviathan seek to
Speaker 2: control or provoke maritime disasters, but they often underestimate the
Speaker 2: power and fury of the demon. Leviathan represents the unpredictable
Speaker 2: and destructive forces that lie beyond human control. The accounts
Speaker 2: of the Kodex Gigas worn of the dangers of summoning
Speaker 2: these demons. Although the rituals promised power and knowledge, the
Speaker 2: risks were immense. Madness, death, or eternal damnation were shared
Speaker 2: fates for summoners who did not fully understand the forces
Speaker 2: they were dealing with.
Speaker 1: So anybody because nobody could possibly understand exactly what they
Speaker 1: were dealing with.
Speaker 2: The Demons of the Codex Gigas are entities of great
Speaker 2: power and malevolence, and the stories surrounding them remind them
Speaker 2: of the dangers of seeking power through dark and esoteric means.
Speaker 1: Hey, these days they just use cerne right and a
Speaker 1: D wave computer.
Speaker 2: The purposes of these rituals varied from the pursuit of
Speaker 2: hidden knowledge and power to the simple satisfaction of darker
Speaker 2: human desires. However, the risks were high, and the stories
Speaker 2: of those who attempted these rituals and suffered terrible consequences
Speaker 2: are abundant. In esoteric literature. Summoners often faced madness, death,
Speaker 2: or eternal damnation, reflecting the inherent dangers of dealing with
Speaker 2: forces beyond human comprehension and control.
Speaker 1: I'm sool h Tracy Twineman kind of comes to mind.
Speaker 1: We had a talked about that with with Niche in
Speaker 1: our last who done it? Kind of some things that
Speaker 1: can happen to you when you're screwed around with things
Speaker 1: you shouldn't be screwed around with. And this is probably
Speaker 1: why so many of them. It's like a parasite, right,
Speaker 1: and if you need to feed the beast, you're going
Speaker 1: to feed the beast. And they've been screwed around this
Speaker 1: stuff for thousands upon thousands of years. Probably keeps them
Speaker 1: binded together in a way, right, whether they want to
Speaker 1: be or not, so that they continue this path of destruction,
Speaker 1: giving the beast whatever it needs or asks for in
Speaker 1: order to get the burden off their back.
Speaker 2: A little mysteries. After exploring the demons and dark rituals
Speaker 2: of the Codex Gigas, we now delve into the mysteries
Speaker 2: and unanswered questions surrounding this enigmatic manuscript. What are some
Speaker 2: of the unsolved enigmas of this book and why did
Speaker 2: the manuscript abruptly stop being written? With its vast collection
Speaker 2: of knowledge and meticulous details, it hides several mysteries that
Speaker 2: have puzzled scholars for centuries. One of the most intriguing
Speaker 2: enigmas is why the manuscript abruptly stops. The writing appears
Speaker 2: to have ceased suddenly without any apparent explanation. Some researchers suggest.
Speaker 1: He ran out of time, remembering on the end of day.
Speaker 2: It's that the author, Herman the Recluse, may have died
Speaker 2: before completing his work.
Speaker 1: This is reminded me of the money paython when it
Speaker 1: goes when they're reading enigoes, er, Oh what happened? Oh
Speaker 1: the writer must have died? Well, he would have he
Speaker 1: would have written, I just would have said er.
Speaker 2: According to the legends. Others speculate that he may have
Speaker 2: been stopped by external forces or even by the devil's intervention.
Speaker 2: Another curiosity is the presence of missing pages. Some scholars
Speaker 2: believe these pages contained even.
Speaker 1: Du yeah, I would blame the Roman Catholic Church for that,
Speaker 1: or some other psychopathic control mechanism out there that once
Speaker 1: those pages for themselves.
Speaker 2: Akka and more robust information, possibly additional instructions for rituals
Speaker 2: or esoteric secrets that were too dangerous to be preserved.
Speaker 1: Or better yet, the way in order to protect yourself
Speaker 1: from this stuff once you start messing with it, it
Speaker 1: omitted so that once you open the door, there's no
Speaker 1: pages there to tell you how to shut it.
Speaker 2: The absence of these pages fuels theories about their content
Speaker 2: and why they would deliberately removed or destroyed. The manuscript's
Speaker 2: true purpose and intended audience also remains subjects of debate.
Speaker 2: While some argue that it was created as a reference
Speaker 2: work for scholars and monks, others believe it may have
Speaker 2: been intended for a darker purpose, perhaps as a grimoire
Speaker 2: or guide for practitioners of black magic. The breadth and
Speaker 2: diversity of the texts suggest that they may have been
Speaker 2: designed to serve multiple purposes, encompassing both the sacred and
Speaker 2: the profane. The book continues to capture the imagination of
Speaker 2: those who study it, offering a portal to a medieval
Speaker 2: world where the line between reality and the supernatural was
Speaker 2: thin and porous.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds about right, right, and whether they always
Speaker 1: try to do open portals right? So I just wanted
Speaker 1: to say real quick, because I am an FTJ today.
Speaker 1: If I am stepping on the toes of somebody because
Speaker 1: of my time slot being different than what I'm broadcasting
Speaker 1: on right now, I don't mean to be pouring audience
Speaker 1: away from anybody else there. If that is happening, I
Speaker 1: do apologize. Wasn't intended, but I just had to rearrange
Speaker 1: my schedule today.
Speaker 2: Each new investigation sheds light on its origin, purpose, and
Speaker 2: the people who created and used it. However, new questions
Speaker 2: arise with each answer, keeping the mystery and fascination surrounding
Speaker 2: this astonishing manuscript alive conclusion in conclusion, the Codex gigas
Speaker 2: known as the Devil's Bible, is a thirteenth century manuscript
Speaker 2: containing the complete Bible and instructions for summoning spirits and
Speaker 2: performing dark rituals. This video has explored its fascinating legends
Speaker 2: and hidden secrets, from demonic invocations to its turbulent history
Speaker 2: over the century. The mysterious and terrifying illustrations, combined with
Speaker 2: its enigmas and esoteric knowledge, intrigue historians and occult enthusiasts.
Speaker 2: Its origin in the puddlers each monastery, and the legends
Speaker 2: of pacts with the devil add a layer of mystery
Speaker 2: that remains a subject of debate and speculation.
Speaker 1: I think in the past, I've definitely brought this book
Speaker 1: up that that page of that image where you see
Speaker 1: the guy with the mustache who's flipping the pages of
Speaker 1: this giant ass book that was on a thumbnail of
Speaker 1: one of my older videos. I didn't get too too
Speaker 1: deep into it because I was actually making a statement
Speaker 1: about how, you know, you know, you need look no
Speaker 1: further than the books that were studying from to be
Speaker 1: good little Christians, and you know, especially in the Old
Speaker 1: Testament and stuff like that, to find a whole lot
Speaker 1: of evil and wrongdoings and strange, very strange lessons by
Speaker 1: the quote unquote God of the Bible. So that was
Speaker 1: kind of where I was going with that with the
Speaker 1: tanak and stuff like that. But some other thing here too,
Speaker 1: is this kind of reminds me of a Hieronymous Bosh painting.
Speaker 1: I don't think it is, but you know, putting those weird,
Speaker 1: grotesque faces and these mutated things in play on a canvas.
Speaker 1: It's this is probably done by AI. But there's a
Speaker 1: lot to be unpacked there with the Hieronymous Bosh paintings
Speaker 1: and illustrations. People should check those out.
Speaker 2: If you enjoyed this video And what did.
Speaker 1: You enjoy the video or was that too basic? Sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna let I'll live it down. I'll let
Speaker 1: it go. Let's see. And Polka asked, did I not
Speaker 1: change this? Oops, that's where I'm boring. So I'm wonder
Speaker 1: if the King James Demon Analogy book was based off
Speaker 1: of this. And then he also said, I'm wondering if
Speaker 1: Faust the story was also inspired by this. Maybe not
Speaker 1: one hundred percent familiar totally as I should be with those,
Speaker 1: but the Faust I mean, I understand the concept of
Speaker 1: the story. I didn't actually ever read it, though there's
Speaker 1: enough things written about it then that I have encountered.
Speaker 1: I haven't actually read the thing itself, all right, So
Speaker 1: there was that story, and I probably could even just
Speaker 1: read from the EDA, because there's so much here that
Speaker 1: what I'm the statements that I'm making, there's so much
Speaker 1: that has to be first, you know, brought to light
Speaker 1: by reading this, and when I have the time to
Speaker 1: actually do it, I will, But man, oh man, it's
Speaker 1: going to take a long time to get through the
Speaker 1: whole thing. It's four and fifty pages or so four
Speaker 1: and fifty one, but you know, there's maybe maybe seventy
Speaker 1: pages of that is appendices, and some of it it's
Speaker 1: actually worth reading too, not all of it, because then
Speaker 1: it goes into definitions and things like that, and you
Speaker 1: can kind of gather the majority of it. You don't
Speaker 1: really need those, but it's it's expanding upon that, and
Speaker 1: some of it's very repetitive because it's already taken into
Speaker 1: account in the body of what he writes, so it's
Speaker 1: kind of repetitive. And you know, so that's I guess
Speaker 1: I could omit some of that and leave it to
Speaker 1: you guys to look further into it, because it's not
Speaker 1: really you can gather everything you need to gather out
Speaker 1: of it without certain pages. But I think we should
Speaker 1: maybe watch more more of these. This is a pretty
Speaker 1: decent channel. I mean, it gives you enough to keep
Speaker 1: you the curiosity. And then it's like I look at
Speaker 1: these as a jumping off point for research, Like if
Speaker 1: there's anything there that I either agree with or disagree with,
Speaker 1: you know, then why not explore those more to confirm
Speaker 1: or you know, enhance or evolve my view on things,
Speaker 1: Not to just take everything. I don't never do that
Speaker 1: when anything takes things that face value. That's why I
Speaker 1: couldn't just read these books that I was reading, Like
Speaker 1: that book that I read the pages to you from,
Speaker 1: I can't read that whole thing because it's there's so
Speaker 1: much there's so many misunderstandings and misrepresentations. And that's again
Speaker 1: the reason why I can't read that Saturn Defficult book.
Speaker 1: The book title sounds great, but then you get into
Speaker 1: this whole it's all speculation and it's not I do
Speaker 1: have the Bill Cooper philosophy when it comes to that,
Speaker 1: you know, the truth is bad enough, we don't need
Speaker 1: to embellish, and we don't need to make up store reason.
Speaker 1: Then go on a long, ask tangent about this, you know,
Speaker 1: and then the building blocks. Each one of them is
Speaker 1: not solid because each each block that you place on
Speaker 1: top of another was all based on your conjecture and
Speaker 1: hearsay and nothing to do with any solid facts. So
Speaker 1: what are we actually doing besides spinning in a circle
Speaker 1: or you know, sniffing our own flatulence. You know, it
Speaker 1: doesn't it doesn't really bode for me that that's not
Speaker 1: a waste. That's that's that's not a proper use of
Speaker 1: my time. You know, I'm looking right now to see.
Speaker 1: The other thing too, is like going back to these
Speaker 1: references of Bible Bible, bye blah Bible. If it's already
Speaker 1: been established that this is not a good thing, like
Speaker 1: this Old Testament, this Torah, this Tonac, and you know,
Speaker 1: consider the source and who wrote it in all this
Speaker 1: other crap, and that they stole your history. So it
Speaker 1: does with you because they stole your history and changed
Speaker 1: up it's uh, you know who the people were, because
Speaker 1: they claim everything that was done for culture, civilization and
Speaker 1: bringing civilization and progress and blah blah blah and fairness
Speaker 1: to the world and morality. That's the biggest joke, that
Speaker 1: they brought morality to the world. They were the ones
Speaker 1: ever getting stomped out because of their immoral acts, and
Speaker 1: yet they flip it around and burn everything that would
Speaker 1: contradict them. So the Deep Notices of Fallen Angels. As
Speaker 1: soon as they say fallen Angels, I'm like, all right,
Speaker 1: I'm out. The Entities of the Hidden Kabbalah by Gersham Scholem.
Speaker 1: You know that's the guy who wrote the book about
Speaker 1: sabbataize Hev, the very long book about sabbatize Ev. That
Speaker 1: my be the next one. The Seven Princes of Hell
Speaker 1: kind of sounds cool too, even though they said the
Speaker 1: the in the title Demonology explained, Yeah, let's go with
Speaker 1: that because this could this could actually bring us to
Speaker 1: some more interesting stuff. It's twenty four minutes versus the
Speaker 1: other one is uh, let's see eighteen. But I don't
Speaker 1: want to. If they're praising Shalom, I would not want
Speaker 1: to be party to that. But they're talking about Bielsville, Samuel,
Speaker 1: Samuel and Moloch. Huh, what'd you say out there in
Speaker 1: the in TV land? Which one you guys want? I'm
Speaker 1: I'm looking at FTJ now and I'm looking over at Uh.
Speaker 1: I'm looking over at Rumble as well. Well, y'all still
Speaker 1: listening intently. Bro. Thank you archangel. I appreciate that you
Speaker 1: guys have have a have a have a vote, because
Speaker 1: I can go either way with this, because obviously I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have I'm gonna have commentary one way or the other.
Speaker 1: But the Entities of the Hidden Kabbala, which again kind
Speaker 1: of falls in line with the Hotel met stuff, it's
Speaker 1: all this is the mysticism of the of when you
Speaker 1: read into things and flip it upside down and backward.
Speaker 1: And then the princes of Hell demonology, explained Metatron, the
Speaker 1: supreme angel of one who bears God's fire. No, let's
Speaker 1: gep that from now. All right, we get out answers.
Speaker 1: We want what Poka wants. Well, I won't. That's not
Speaker 1: really having your own opinion, there is it?
Speaker 2: All right?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm picking because I don't hear anything, I don't
Speaker 1: see anything, so I'm picking. We gotta move. We've got
Speaker 1: to move this thing along. And then there's gonna be
Speaker 1: a special announcement, So don't go anywhere where. Entities of
Speaker 1: the Hidden Kabbala. How's it hidden? But anyhow, if they
Speaker 1: start blowing smoke up or ass about how wonderful this
Speaker 1: stuff is, then we can pass on it. Were not
Speaker 1: frightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the
Speaker 1: darkness conscious. Carli Young, did.
Speaker 2: You know that hidden within the mystical teachings of the
Speaker 2: Kabbala lie entities so fearsome they can alter your perception
Speaker 2: of good and evil?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Okay, so here we go again. Remember how they
Speaker 1: deify people and then corrupt with their attributes, are right?
Speaker 1: Their characteristic Keep that in mind when you're listening to this,
Speaker 1: because I kind of see where this is already going.
Speaker 1: But there's also another there's another elements here, but I'll
Speaker 1: I'll just let it go for now.
Speaker 2: Join us as we uncover these terrifying beings and their
Speaker 2: secrets in this video we delve in.
Speaker 1: All right, fine, I'll just say it. The Kabbala, what
Speaker 1: they do with the whole alien thing and the UFO
Speaker 1: thing is they re they remarket, they repackage these demons,
Speaker 1: Babylonian demons, demons of these books, and they give them
Speaker 1: new new life as as quote unquote aliens. So they're
Speaker 1: they're making them, they're they're they're getting you thinking and
Speaker 1: using your energy towards these ideas and concepts by tricking
Speaker 1: you into thinking that we're talking about something completely different,
Speaker 1: when in reality, it's these demons that you're feeding your
Speaker 1: energy to. So that's just something to throw out there.
Speaker 2: Into Gersham Sholm's revelations about the terrifying beings lurking within
Speaker 2: Kabbalistic laws esoteric layers. We'll explore these enigmatic figures, origins, characteristics,
Speaker 2: and significance the challenge our understanding of the spiritual realm.
Speaker 2: Stay with us until the end to uncover the secrets
Speaker 2: these entities hold and discover their unexpected impact on the
Speaker 2: mystical tradition of Kabbala. Gersham Shoalm and the Kabbala Gersham Sholm,
Speaker 2: the father of modern Kabbala studies, was an exceptional scholar
Speaker 2: who unveiled the hidden secrets of this ancient Jewish mystical tradition.
Speaker 2: Born in Berlin in eighteen ninety seven, he dedicated his
Speaker 2: life to studying and understanding Kabbalistic texts revealing knowledge.
Speaker 1: He was a pro samity in jew let's just put
Speaker 1: it where it belongs. Even though the Francis aren't ones
Speaker 1: to put it where it belongs, he put it where
Speaker 1: it doesn't belong.
Speaker 2: In the bomb that had remained in darkness for centuries.
Speaker 2: Kabbala is a spiritual tradition that seeks to understand the
Speaker 2: nature of God, the universe, and the human soul. While
Speaker 2: it is commonly known for its teachings on personal growth
Speaker 2: and spiritual enlightenment, Sholom discovered it also possesses a dark
Speaker 2: and mysterious side, filled with fearsome entities and chaotic forces.
Speaker 2: Sholom found references to powerful and often terrifying beings within
Speaker 2: Kabbalistic texts in his studies. These entities challenge our understanding
Speaker 2: of reality, representing the data aspects of divine and cosmic
Speaker 2: forces contrary to the standard image.
Speaker 1: In this points right back to what these people really are.
Speaker 1: It's this priest craft from long long ago, taking on
Speaker 1: new forms, new titles, new shields, and polishing up their
Speaker 1: image a little bit to market it to more people.
Speaker 1: I mean, what are I mean, how many is it?
Speaker 1: Two billion they say are Christians? And how many of
Speaker 1: those are you know poison with the Christian Zionism. And
Speaker 1: then you have the simple fact that it's all based
Speaker 1: off of their first book, right, not even so much
Speaker 1: in the New Testament, of course, But I mean, how
Speaker 1: much of that is awesome manipulation. And then you have Islam,
Speaker 1: and then you have obviously Judaism, which sprouted out out
Speaker 1: of nowhere. That wasn't the thing before. So going back
Speaker 1: thousands of years, they weren't called Jews, and they weren't
Speaker 1: called you know, they wanted there was no Judaism. So
Speaker 1: what was it? And where they come from? And what
Speaker 1: were they and what did they bring over into this new,
Speaker 1: you know, polished up version of themselves which wasn't really
Speaker 1: all that polished.
Speaker 2: Of Kabbala as a source of wisdom and peace. These
Speaker 2: hidden figures reveal a much more complex and formidable side.
Speaker 2: By investigating both the luminous and dark aspects, Sholm provided
Speaker 2: us with a complete vision of Kabbala. He reminded us
Speaker 2: that on the mystical path, light and darkness coexist, each
Speaker 2: revealing different facets of the divine mystery. These changes enhance
Speaker 2: the clarity and appeal of the content, keeping the viewer
Speaker 2: engaged and facilitating a deeper understanding of the topic. Elcitra
Speaker 2: akra the other side. Now that we understand who Gersham
Speaker 2: Sholm was and his work on Kabbala, let's delve into
Speaker 2: one of the most intriguing and dark concepts. He discovered
Speaker 2: the citra Acra, known as the other side. The citra
Speaker 2: Acra is a fundamental part of Kabbala, representing the forces
Speaker 2: of evil and darkness. Unlike the sacred and luminous side
Speaker 2: of Kabbala, the citra acra refers to everything impure and chaotic.
Speaker 1: Which they assigned to us, right the non anybody who
Speaker 1: isn't them. We perpetuate the evil, and we are made
Speaker 1: from it.
Speaker 2: Right concept is crucial for understanding the balance between good
Speaker 2: and evil in Kabbalistic cosmology. According to Kabbala, the universe
Speaker 2: comprises opposing forces in constant balance. The sacred side is
Speaker 2: the domain of purity and divine light.
Speaker 1: And I would say that's also a misdirection, because that
Speaker 1: gives them a place, that puts gives evil a place
Speaker 1: in our world. If it has to be, if both
Speaker 1: have to be represented, I don't think they do. I
Speaker 1: don't think they do. I think you could stomp them
Speaker 1: out and live pretty damn happily.
Speaker 2: While the citra acra is the realm of shadows and impurity,
Speaker 2: these dark forces are not merely evil, but also necessary
Speaker 2: for the balance of the cosmos. Without the city.
Speaker 1: Again, I think that's misdirection. I think that's deception.
Speaker 2: Citra acra, the concept of good would have no meaning.
Speaker 2: The citra acra is.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't know without evil existing that harming a child
Speaker 1: was a bad idea and a horrible thing to do.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't know that instinctively. This argument always seemed very
Speaker 1: weak to me.
Speaker 2: Formed by negative energies that feed on impurity and sin.
Speaker 1: That seems like it's spoken from a person who doesn't
Speaker 1: have an actual tether to a higher thing. Right, whether
Speaker 1: you want to call it God or a higher sel
Speaker 1: or whatever, you don't have that communication. You don't have
Speaker 1: that nosis with something that already informs you of what's
Speaker 1: right and what's wrong, or if it does, you don't
Speaker 1: care because it doesn't affect your decision making. So then
Speaker 1: it's a conscious choice to do whatever you feel like doing,
Speaker 1: do without wilt.
Speaker 2: Right energies represent the forces of evil that's separated from
Speaker 2: the divine side during creation. They are known as the
Speaker 2: cliff off or shells symbolizing the cap.
Speaker 1: Again, that's they're blaming us for all this. This is
Speaker 1: what they assign to us. That's our value and the
Speaker 1: Chicaina or the female energy will be probably discussed here too.
Speaker 2: They are taken destructive remnants left after the divine light withdrew,
Speaker 2: making space for evil and imperfection. In Kabbala, the sitra
Speaker 2: akra is understood to play it crucial role in a
Speaker 2: person's spiritual life. Facing and overcoming its influences is part
Speaker 2: of the mystical journey toward enlightenment and spiritual purity. These
Speaker 2: trials and tribulations are essential for spiritual growth and development,
Speaker 2: helping individuals find the balance between light and darkness within themselves.
Speaker 2: Gersham Sholom emphasized the importance of understanding the Sitra Acra
Speaker 2: to gain a complete vision of Kabbala. By acknowledging the
Speaker 2: existence of these dark forces, we can better appreciate the
Speaker 2: complexity of creation and the ongoing struggle between good and evil,
Speaker 2: the clippot shells of impurity. Having explored the concept of
Speaker 2: the Sitra Acra, it is essential to delve into an
Speaker 2: even more specific and crucial aspect of these dark forces.
Speaker 2: The clippot or shells of impurity.
Speaker 1: The shit call it what they call it.
Speaker 2: The clipot is a central concept in Kabbala, referring to
Speaker 2: the barriers that darken and enclose divine light.
Speaker 1: Imagine, divine We're all the extra people that were created
Speaker 1: through this clipot, this whole event where the jars, God
Speaker 1: was so stupid he fumbled the jars didn't know how
Speaker 1: to make one that would you know, contain his light
Speaker 1: because he's a dumbass or something. That's what we're supposed to
Speaker 1: believe in this whole weird concept that they have, and
Speaker 1: the result was everybody that isn't them are these lower
Speaker 1: forms that need to be wiped out in order for
Speaker 1: their wonderful Messhak and God to return.
Speaker 2: Light as a pure, radiant source. The clipot are like
Speaker 2: opaque layers that block and distort this light. These shells
Speaker 2: prevent divine light from shining in full intensity and represents
Speaker 2: spiritual obstacles we must overcome to achieve purity and closeness
Speaker 2: to the divine. According to Kabbala, the origin of the
Speaker 2: clippot dates back to the earliest moments of creation. Divine
Speaker 2: light contracted and was limited during the creation process, leaving
Speaker 2: impurity residues. These impurities formed the clippot, layers of negative
Speaker 2: energy that cling to all of creation, both in the
Speaker 2: physical and spiritual worlds. They are considered the product of
Speaker 2: imbalances and ruptures in the structure of the cosmos, an
Speaker 2: inevitable byproduct of the separation between the divine and the material.
Speaker 2: The characteristics of the clippot are varied and complex.
Speaker 1: Again, no one was there for this, No one wrote
Speaker 1: any of this down as it was happening. Yet this
Speaker 1: is again another mind disease exercise from a very sick
Speaker 1: minded individual group of peopleplex.
Speaker 2: They are described as hard, thick shells, but.
Speaker 1: This is coming right out of the Lori and Kabbala.
Speaker 2: That envelop divine light, preventing full access and distorting its
Speaker 2: influence in spiritual life. The clipot manifests as negative tendencies,
Speaker 2: selfish desires, and emotional obstacles that distance people from their
Speaker 2: true spiritual purpose. In Kabbala, the clipot are classified into
Speaker 2: several types, each with its nature and effect on the
Speaker 2: human soul and the cosmos. Clippot Noga is the brightest shell,
Speaker 2: with a dual aspect which can be both positive and negative.
Speaker 2: It represents worldly temptations and desires that can be redirected
Speaker 2: toward good or evil. Clippotnoga has a spark of holiness
Speaker 2: and can therefore be redeemed and transformed into divine light
Speaker 2: through righteous and spiritual actions.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they want to break all these shells, meaning
Speaker 1: us to release our way and bring it back the source.
Speaker 2: In contrast, the three clipots of total impurity are completely
Speaker 2: dark and contain no divine light. They represent absolute evil
Speaker 2: and corruption and cannot be redeemed. The first is Ruak,
Speaker 2: representing the spirit of impurity. The second is Afar, symbolizing
Speaker 2: dust and decay. The third is maim, related to the
Speaker 2: turbulent waters of impurity. Exploring and understanding the clippot is
Speaker 2: essential for navigating spiritual.
Speaker 1: Challenges, mayam, sounds of awful that like mayhem.
Speaker 2: And drawing closer to divine light. These shells of impurity
Speaker 2: are obstacles we must overcome to achieve purity and holiness
Speaker 2: in our spiritual lives.
Speaker 1: How do these people not embody those very negative things
Speaker 1: that they just described.
Speaker 2: Dark entities of citra acra. Having explored the clippot, we
Speaker 2: now delve into the terrifying entities of the citra acra.
Speaker 2: We begin with Beilzebub, known as the Lord of the Flies, Belzebub,
Speaker 2: whose name evokes images of corruption and decay. Is described
Speaker 2: in Kabbala as a formidable figure with black wings and
Speaker 2: bright red eyes that reflect his malevolent nature. His presence
Speaker 2: is accompanied by a swarm of flies, symbolizing the decay
Speaker 2: and impurity he governs.
Speaker 1: And that is why they named Lord of the flies,
Speaker 1: lord of the flies. Even though you think it's piggy,
Speaker 1: and you think it's the head and the flies, Nope, nope, nope,
Speaker 1: There is a deeper meaning to all that.
Speaker 2: This being is tall and slender, with grayish skin and
Speaker 2: a sinister smile that reveals a row of sharp teeth.
Speaker 2: In Kabalistic tradition, Belzebub has roots in ancient Semitic beliefs,
Speaker 2: where he was initially worshiped as a god. However, over
Speaker 2: time he was demonized in Jewish and Christian traditions.
Speaker 1: So their root is worship of demons. Got it, Thanks,
Speaker 1: Thanks for the confirmation.
Speaker 2: He embodies destructive forces and temptations that seek to divert
Speaker 2: souls from their spiritual path. Belzebub is known for inciting
Speaker 2: humans to fall into lust, gluttony, and other worldly desires
Speaker 2: that lead them away from spiritual purity. His tactics may
Speaker 2: include manipulating thoughts and emotions, fostering discord and moral corruption.
Speaker 2: People under his influence may find their lives filled with
Speaker 2: chaos and disorder, drifting further from divine light and their
Speaker 2: true spiritual purpose. Kabbalists employ various practices and rituals to
Speaker 2: protect themselves from Belzebub's influence. Meditation and prayer are essential
Speaker 2: for strengthening the connection to divine light and resisting temptations. Additionally,
Speaker 2: Kabbalists recite sacred texts and use amulets with specific inscriptions
Speaker 2: believed to repel Belzebub and other evil forces. Purity of
Speaker 2: thought and action is also crucial to avoid falling under
Speaker 2: his influence. Another prominent and feared entity in the Citra
Speaker 2: Acra is Samael, often called the Angel of Death. Samael
Speaker 2: is an imposing figure with black wings and glowing eyes.
Speaker 1: As I just purchased a sam sung or maybe the
Speaker 1: voice of Semiel, right, I just find that interesting.
Speaker 2: Emitting a deathly light, his skin is pale like wax,
Speaker 2: and he wears a dark cloak that absorbs the light
Speaker 2: around him. He is often depicted with a flaming sword,
Speaker 2: symbolizing his power to execute divine decrees of death and destruction.
Speaker 2: In Kabbala, Samiel is a complex figure embodying both destruction
Speaker 2: and justice. His name means poison of God, reflecting his
Speaker 2: dual nature as both an agent of divinity and a
Speaker 2: force of evil. He acts as a necessary instrument to
Speaker 2: maintain cosmic balance, executing divine judgments of death and punishment.
Speaker 2: Samiel's influence profoundly impacts Kabala's understanding of life and death.
Speaker 2: He represents the dark side of divine judgment, where souls
Speaker 2: must face the consequences of their actions. Those under his
Speaker 2: influence may experience deep despair, fear, and a constant sense
Speaker 2: of imminent threat. Samiel's presence can lead to increased violence, disease,
Speaker 2: and premature death as he fulfills divine decrees of punishment.
Speaker 2: Kabalists practice specific rituals and prayers to protect themselves from
Speaker 2: Samiel's influence. These include reciting the Shema Israel, a declaration
Speaker 2: of faith in God's oneness, and other prayers invoking divine protection.
Speaker 2: Performing mitzvot, or good deeds, is also essential to repel
Speaker 2: Samiel's negative energies. Kabalists also use amulets and talismans containing
Speaker 2: sacred names and symbols to repel his influence and protect
Speaker 2: the bearer. Then we've got Belphegor, the demon of sloth.
Speaker 2: Belfagor is a formidable and insidious demon associated with the
Speaker 2: sin of sloth, laziness, and idle curiosity. In Kabbalistic tradition,
Speaker 2: he is often depicted as a hideous and corpulent figure
Speaker 2: with a bloated and lethargic appearance. He is usually shown
Speaker 2: sitting on a throne of filth or a commode, symbolizing
Speaker 2: his association with decay and stagnation. His eyes are heavy liddid,
Speaker 2: and his expression is one of perpetual boredom and disinterest.
Speaker 2: His origins can be traced apathy back to ancient Moabite mythology,
Speaker 2: where he was worshiped as bal Pare, a god of
Speaker 2: fertility and debauchery. Over time, he was assimilated into Jewish
Speaker 2: and Christian demonology as a demon of sloth and gluttony.
Speaker 2: His primary role is to encourage laziness and procrastination, leading
Speaker 2: individuals away from their spiritual and worldly responsibilities.
Speaker 1: Is now they just have TV and phones for that.
Speaker 2: Influence is subtle but pervasive. He entices people to indulge
Speaker 2: in idleness, complacency, and hedonistic pleasures, causing them to neglect
Speaker 2: their duties and spiritual growth. Under his sway, individuals may
Speaker 2: become apathetic, indifferent, and detached from their goals and aspirations.
Speaker 2: This can lead to a life of unfulfilled, potential, stagnation,
Speaker 2: and moral decay. To counteract his influence, Kebbalists employ various
Speaker 2: spiritual practices and disciplines. Regular prayer, meditation, and study are
Speaker 2: essential to maintaining a focused and active mind. Engaging in
Speaker 2: acts of charity and performing good deeds helps to combat
Speaker 2: laziness and promote a sense of purpose and fulfillment. Kabbalists
Speaker 2: also recite specific prayers and psalms, such as Psalm twenty three,
Speaker 2: to invoke divine assistance in overcoming sloth and lethargy. Finally,
Speaker 2: in exploring the terrifying entities of the Sitra Acra, we
Speaker 2: arrive at Lilith, the queen of Demons. Lilith is a
Speaker 2: fascinating and feared figure in the Kabbalistic tradition. She is
Speaker 2: described as a woman of supernatural beauty, but with an
Speaker 2: aura of darkness and danger. Her eyes shine with hypnotic intensity,
Speaker 2: and her long black hair cascades over her shoulders. She
Speaker 2: is often depicted with black wings and sharp claws, symbolizing
Speaker 2: her demonic nature.
Speaker 1: So they kept on bringing up Discordia right and discord
Speaker 1: and they started you know, Eiris was the goddess of discord.
Speaker 1: I just want to because Lilith is a composite of that.
Speaker 1: So obviously, the descendant of omicron Aires is already a
Speaker 1: dominant coronavirus subvariant in the country, infecting more people than
Speaker 1: any other single train. That was October twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: Discordianism is the belief is a belief system based around Eiris,
Speaker 1: the Greek goddess of strife and discord, and variously defined
Speaker 1: as a religion, new religious movement blah blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: though prior to two thousand and five some sources categorized
Speaker 1: as a parody religion. It was founded after the nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty three publication of Principia Discordia, written by Greg Hill
Speaker 1: and Carrie Wendell Thornley, the two working under the pseudonyms
Speaker 1: Malecalypse and the Younger and Malaclipse the Younger and Omar
Speaker 1: Ravenhurst so Robert Antone Wilson is tied into that too,
Speaker 1: you know who that is, just throwing some extra detail
Speaker 1: into this.
Speaker 2: And her ability for deception and seduction in capitalistic.
Speaker 1: He is also a child killer, you remember, stealing children
Speaker 1: in the night and draining the blood. She goes the
Speaker 1: way back to Babylon.
Speaker 2: Yeah, big texts. Lilith is known as the first wife
Speaker 2: of Adam, created equal to him and therefore not subordinate.
Speaker 2: Her refusal to submit to Adam led to her expulsion
Speaker 2: from the Garden of Eden, after which she became a
Speaker 2: demonic entity. Lilith symbolizes rebellion and independence taken to the extreme.
Speaker 1: So when they have people like this and they're talking
Speaker 1: that the number one this is inverted. But we'll have
Speaker 1: to talk about the British Edita in order to make
Speaker 1: sense of that part. A lot of times these deities
Speaker 1: are representative of an entire cult, so a cult representing
Speaker 1: and they're saying like she was cast out of Eden, well,
Speaker 1: Thor cast out this entire cult and it was a
Speaker 1: matriarchical cult and Woden and Heidi the mom were the
Speaker 1: ones that were beaten, destroyed and pushed along out of
Speaker 1: you know out of the favor of the people and
Speaker 1: out of the power structure that they had, and that
Speaker 1: that would have ended their golden age. So it's all
Speaker 1: it's all very interesting how this is intertwined. But it's always,
Speaker 1: of course, if they're telling the story, they're the good.
Speaker 2: Guys challenging established norms and structures. Lilith is known for
Speaker 2: her role as a seductress and destroyer. She is said
Speaker 2: to attack newborns and mothers during childbirth and to seek
Speaker 2: vengeance on humanity for her expulsion from Eden. Her influence
Speaker 2: manifests in sexual temptation.
Speaker 1: That's where you have to raprehend around the idea that
Speaker 1: the Edenites were the cult right, the black magic, and
Speaker 1: their expulsion from Eden being upset because oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: Goths came in and got rid of the garbage human
Speaker 1: the garbage humanity that was there oppressing the people.
Speaker 2: And moral corruption, using her allure to divert men from
Speaker 2: their duties and lead them to ruin. The figure of
Speaker 2: Lilith and Kabbala symbolizes the forces of chaos and rebellion
Speaker 2: against divine order. She represents the uncontrollable and destructive aspects
Speaker 2: of freedom and independence, as a reminder of the dangers
Speaker 2: of straying from the paths of righteousness and submission to
Speaker 2: the divine conclusion. In our exploration of the demonic entities
Speaker 2: of the Sitra Acra in Kabbala, we have encountered figures
Speaker 2: such as Beelzebub, Samuel, Moloch, Asmadeus, and Lilith. These entities
Speaker 2: not only personify evil, but also challenge and teach us
Speaker 2: about the constant struggle between light and darkness. They remind
Speaker 2: us of the importance of purity, justice, and righteousness, and
Speaker 2: how facing and overcoming evil is crucial for our spiritual growth.
Speaker 2: Kabbala shows us that enlightenment involves understanding and conquering these
Speaker 2: dark forces, strengthening our faith and connection to the divine light.
Speaker 1: Bullshit, bullshit, it's their their bringing this stuff to light
Speaker 1: and spreading this idea among people. They're giving it light
Speaker 1: in life and they're giving it energy. That's what they're doing.
Speaker 1: So there's that, and now let's present something here. I
Speaker 1: just want to say hello to everybody over there on FTJ,
Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and rumble and hello to Twitter. Okay that
Speaker 1: being said, real quick, you got to do the housekeeping
Speaker 1: stuff here and then we'll get right back into a
Speaker 1: little bit of the EDDA. Then I got to cut
Speaker 1: it out. So if you are on FTJ Media as
Speaker 1: am I, you can go right over to you see
Speaker 1: the description here Mooney's Goonies and demon analogy the Moon
Speaker 1: Saturn sorcery interception. Oh eve a right, because that's who's responsible.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why they clipped this. It just kind
Speaker 1: of cut. But if you just like highlight the whole thing,
Speaker 1: you could copy and paste it. And yeah, there's the
Speaker 1: thing for doctor Glidd in there. But I wanted to
Speaker 1: show you where is it. So this is the website
Speaker 1: and I actually put the Holiday Helper in there right
Speaker 1: there so you can find the twelve percent off to
Speaker 1: keep on from my site. But beneath that, if you
Speaker 1: want to write me a letter, I will read it.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: If you want to send me something that you make
Speaker 1: as a business or whatever, I will. I will display
Speaker 1: it and show it here. And like I said, I'm
Speaker 1: not smoothy, so no deal does please sure as help
Speaker 1: won't demonstrate that, but great down here money tree publishing
Speaker 1: dot com. Okay, backslash or forwards, I don't remember the
Speaker 1: right name for that. It's leaning forward but it's starting backward. Whatever,
Speaker 1: however way you want to interpret that, that is the
Speaker 1: site that will bring you here. And Europa the Last Battle.
Speaker 1: If you're thinking of something for somebody who is you
Speaker 1: care enough about to want them to know and understand
Speaker 1: things a little bit better so that you know they're
Speaker 1: not unintentionally supporting or you know, champion the very evil
Speaker 1: that they think that they're against, then maybe this would
Speaker 1: be a good place to start them. And this would
Speaker 1: be a good thing for a Christmas gift, perhaps Europa.
Speaker 1: It can be found on DVD and Blu ray by
Speaker 1: clicking that, okay, And then the other thing I would
Speaker 1: highly recommend before. I mean I've said a million times
Speaker 1: is Helstorm, the book that I mean you got a dad,
Speaker 1: get them Hellstorm, you know, and everybody should be reading
Speaker 1: that book, everybody. And then you can use uh I
Speaker 1: think it's right there, Hold on, right, there's the code
Speaker 1: for ten percent of all. I don't know if it
Speaker 1: has to be all caps or not. And I did
Speaker 1: start a family channel on YouTube. I'm sorry to putting
Speaker 1: new stuff on it. Me and my daughter, our adventures
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, and some you know, workout tips
Speaker 1: and stuff like that. But that YouTube right there, go
Speaker 1: for it is the channel, and if you want to
Speaker 1: follow over there, take a look at some stuff that's
Speaker 1: not related to this stuff. Go right ahead, all right,
Speaker 1: and the same thing. You find the same information on
Speaker 1: Rumble in the same spot and right here. I don't
Speaker 1: think they broke the They didn't break the link. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure why it happened over there, but they didn't
Speaker 1: break the link here, So you can just go over there. Ok.
Speaker 1: Moving on, we're going to go to so just the bike. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's just that one, so where we left off, and
Speaker 1: let me just double check them see what time it is,
Speaker 1: because I don't I don't know how long I've been
Speaker 1: on yet. It's already I've already been out for an
Speaker 1: hour and forty seven, so this is gonna be very short.
Speaker 1: I've got I gotta try to start off this computer
Speaker 1: and I got some internet orders to do, so thank
Speaker 1: you for that. By the way, I noticed a lot
Speaker 1: of people who are writing in the comments that they
Speaker 1: are checking out the Hot Sauce from you know, watching
Speaker 1: the show and then also sending me emails afterwards telling
Speaker 1: me how much they liked it. So that that's always
Speaker 1: nice to hear and I appreciate it. Okay. So again,
Speaker 1: like I said, I'm gonna end up reading the vast
Speaker 1: majority of this and probably doing it on a screen
Speaker 1: from you know, obs directly, but not broadcasting it, and
Speaker 1: then just doing all of my editing and sending it
Speaker 1: out maybe on Patreon at first for a little while.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: We'll see. I feel like I should put more on
Speaker 1: the Patreon, so maybe that's what I'll do. But I
Speaker 1: want more people to see this too, So it's kind
Speaker 1: of a kind of stuck. Stuck there, chills trying to
Speaker 1: contemplate what I should do with it. Let's see, we'll
Speaker 1: just start right here. Says that's actually not right there,
Speaker 1: where's the sentence begin? It's a long sentence. As a result,
Speaker 1: my new literal translation of the Eda text, made many
Speaker 1: years ago and now offered in these pages, this is
Speaker 1: lay L speaking and utilizing therein the admirable collated edition
Speaker 1: of the different manuscripts Texts by Nickel furnishes for the
Speaker 1: first time a critically exact translation of the Eda by
Speaker 1: It's strictly literal rendering, except as regards to words that
Speaker 1: have been become obsolete. It demonstrates the radical affinity of
Speaker 1: the Edic language with the English, and it retains more
Speaker 1: fully than before the alliterative character of the original poem
Speaker 1: upon which the assonance of the etic verse largely depends.
Speaker 1: But most important of all, this translation, made in the
Speaker 1: light of the discovery that Thor was identical with the
Speaker 1: first historical Samerian king of corresponding name and achievements, and
Speaker 1: with the first traditional king of the Arians before the
Speaker 1: separation of their Eastern branch, has enabled me to reconstruct
Speaker 1: the hitherto hopelessly disordered and detached at a lays or
Speaker 1: like lines in the poem right lays back into their
Speaker 1: original and consistent sequence on their historical basis. This new
Speaker 1: translation and reconstruction disclosed that the EDA was the traditional
Speaker 1: version of the Great Epic of the Northern branch of
Speaker 1: the Goths, including the Britons, celebrating the establishment of the
Speaker 1: world's civilization by King Thor Or Airthor or Arthur right
Speaker 1: Arthur Knights at around table. They put it in medieval times,
Speaker 1: but it wasn't it. Moreover, enabled me to recognize and
Speaker 1: recover in the Eda the full strings of the titles
Speaker 1: that the first king his queen, the heroic crown Prince
Speaker 1: as used by the Samerians, as well as the Samerian
Speaker 1: geographical names with their identifications in Asia Minor and Mesopotamia,
Speaker 1: which have been faithfully preserved in the Eda manuscript in
Speaker 1: writing down to the present day. This synthesis and rearrangement
Speaker 1: of the disordered Eta allays, by means of our new
Speaker 1: historical and traditional keys, Samerian and Indian whaltst transforming the
Speaker 1: whole scheme of the Edda as hitherto imagined, disclosed the
Speaker 1: striking fact that the grossly misleading confusion and perversion hitherto
Speaker 1: current in the interpretation of the Eda were introduced by
Speaker 1: the Icelander Snorri and treadulously followed by all modern Yuaruropean writers.
Speaker 1: You know, you take something that's wrong and you keep
Speaker 1: running with it right. That's why I don't like speculation either. Snory,
Speaker 1: we have seen, was the author of the melodramatic mythological
Speaker 1: tale or romance, founded on certain extracts from the Eda,
Speaker 1: mostly mistranslated, and prefaced by the statement of his notions
Speaker 1: that the Edlas were mythological, which treatises has laterally been
Speaker 1: dignified by the title of the prose Edda. The serious
Speaker 1: perversions of the Eda theme thus introduced by Snorri include,
Speaker 1: amongst other things, his mistaking the mere titles of leading
Speaker 1: heroes and heroines for separate and distinctly different personages, and
Speaker 1: thus fictitiously increasing the real number of the heroes and
Speaker 1: heroines and confusing the sense. The use by the Samerians
Speaker 1: of titles and multiple titles for their early kings and
Speaker 1: heroes besides their personal names has been demonstrated in my
Speaker 1: previous work. This use of multiple titles for ancient kings
Speaker 1: and heroes continued down to classic times, where Homer and
Speaker 1: other bards regularly call their heroes by their titles or
Speaker 1: cognimens as well as by their personal names, in order
Speaker 1: to vary the monotony of repetition and their songs. Other
Speaker 1: I say, one of the most seriously misleading instances of
Speaker 1: this mistaken use of an eedic title for a totally
Speaker 1: different personage by Snorri and by all modern etic writers
Speaker 1: mechanically following him, is the mistaking of the Odin title
Speaker 1: of Thor for the name of Woden or Woden, the
Speaker 1: arch enemy of Thor, and thus completely vitiating and perverting
Speaker 1: the whole scheme of the etic epic wops for Odin,
Speaker 1: as I have demonstrated in my previous work, was a
Speaker 1: title of king ur Dur or Indara in the sameia,
Speaker 1: and wherein it is spelled odo In or udo In
Speaker 1: with the shorter variant of Odo or Udu, and in
Speaker 1: the Eda text, as now literally translated Thorpe bears unequivocally,
Speaker 1: unequivocally the the repeatedly and I'm sorry, and repeatedly the
Speaker 1: titles come on of Odin and Odo. But Snorri in
Speaker 1: the introduction of his Taiale, identifies Odin with Wodin, whom
Speaker 1: he calls vodin, the letter v W being absent in
Speaker 1: Icelandic and Norse and replaced by the late letter V.
Speaker 1: Thus he says Votin whom we call Odin. This identification
Speaker 1: by Snory was presumably owing to his inability to find
Speaker 1: the name Woden or Voting in the Eta manuscript, from
Speaker 1: which it is absent in all existing copies, and partly
Speaker 1: to Woden having been with his blood sacrifices the popular
Speaker 1: war god or war demon of the Icelanders and Scandinavians
Speaker 1: down till only two centuries before Snowy's time. Now Wodin
Speaker 1: Wotan or Wodin Sultan on that movie, or Wodan by
Speaker 1: his older name of Bodo or Balta, corresponding to his
Speaker 1: Sumerian name of Budu Butu or Buden. The serpent footed
Speaker 1: is throughout the Eda. Again, that's part of their totem right.
Speaker 1: The serpent is throughout the Eda represented as the malignant
Speaker 1: aboriginal chieftain of the Moon and Serpent dragon cult and
Speaker 1: an antagonist of King Thor in his Great information in
Speaker 1: his Great Reformation, bringing civilization and fairness and justice to
Speaker 1: a place was heavily, heavily, heavily bought by these sick,
Speaker 1: human sacrificing cults. This significantly is in series with the
Speaker 1: Vedic Sanskrit name of bud Budnya or the bottom, as
Speaker 1: the arch enemy of Indra iandry or Thor, and he
Speaker 1: was represented in the Veda mythically as the great serpent
Speaker 1: of the bottom or deep, the Puthon or Python of
Speaker 1: the Greeks, which would make him Typhon right. Probably similarly,
Speaker 1: in some later Adela's Wooden or Bodo is also represented
Speaker 1: mythologically as the Great Serpent. Moreover, Bud is still the
Speaker 1: name for him, surviving in modern Indian weekday nomenclature, wherein
Speaker 1: Wednesday or Wooden's day is called Booth. And curiously, the
Speaker 1: Indian lunar Brahmas, who adopted his moon and serpent and
Speaker 1: hell cult despite the evidence of the Veda as to
Speaker 1: his demonist character, also make him the father of the
Speaker 1: first Arian king, just as the later European Woldenness arbitrarily
Speaker 1: make Woden the father of Thor, presumably because Thor's reign
Speaker 1: dates from the downfall of Woden, whom he conquered. Indeed,
Speaker 1: the self same confusion occurs also in Egyptian myth, wherein
Speaker 1: the Semitic priests, Oh surprise, surprise commonality. There common common
Speaker 1: problem here of the Nile Valley degraded the original pure
Speaker 1: son worship of Asar or Osiris the Samerian Asari title
Speaker 1: of King Dur or Tur by deliberately introducing into it
Speaker 1: the serpent and animal sacrificial cult of their own debased
Speaker 1: aboriginal Egyptian mother son creed, which was essentially similar to
Speaker 1: the pre adamant Adamite Chaldean okay let me say something
Speaker 1: real quick. I was reading so thing today and there
Speaker 1: was last night where they said Osiris, who I know,
Speaker 1: had sex with his mom, and I'm like, nope, already wrong.
Speaker 1: You're conflating two different things where Osiris and sun worship
Speaker 1: began versus when it was corrupted and changed, just like
Speaker 1: you know, Freemasons then Freemasons after seventeen eighties or any
Speaker 1: other goddamn thing that these people touched. So incorrect. So
Speaker 1: then they're going to go on this long ass tangent
Speaker 1: with this misinformation. Either they're wrong or they're perpetualing a
Speaker 1: lie on purpose. But anything that comes after that, it's like, Okay,
Speaker 1: you've already screwed up. There's no reason to continue to
Speaker 1: read your your opinion on this because you're just making
Speaker 1: sure you can't possibly get beginning to the truth if
Speaker 1: you already have that mistake, right, and you're trying to
Speaker 1: make this thing into a bad thing because sun worship
Speaker 1: is evil and pagan. Right, Well, that's kind of interesting
Speaker 1: because that kind of works really well towards all these
Speaker 1: people who want you to hate your own history and
Speaker 1: then give all the attributes and all the accolade credit
Speaker 1: to them, making you garbage and them necessary for you
Speaker 1: to protect and all this other bullshit. There's a deeper
Speaker 1: thing here that's going on that has to be corrected. Thus,
Speaker 1: Wooden Wutan Bodo or Ablata we shall find, was called
Speaker 1: by the Semitic Egyptians Bhutan or Pata, and was their
Speaker 1: traditional human ancestor and represented as a naked dwarf with
Speaker 1: attendant serpents, and laterally identified by these neulodic priests with
Speaker 1: King Osiris or Ampti Atmu and invested with the sower
Speaker 1: attributes and achievements of the latter. So it's all screwed up,
Speaker 1: and they what they do, They poison the Sirius thing right. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: this confusion is worse confounded by finding that although the
Speaker 1: name Odin is exclusively used for Thor in the central
Speaker 1: lay and most of the other lays and certain layer
Speaker 1: later lays of the Codex Regius and other manuscript copies
Speaker 1: of the Eda, the name Odin is actually used for
Speaker 1: Woden as However, all these existing copies date to the
Speaker 1: period of Snory and later. It seems probable that the
Speaker 1: older name of Bodo or Blato or Budnya for Woden
Speaker 1: had been arbitrarily altered by the scribes into Odin under
Speaker 1: the influence of Snorri's theory. But our new keys and
Speaker 1: the contexts of the Eda itself indicate clearly in all
Speaker 1: cases where this Odin name has been substituted for Woden,
Speaker 1: so they made big mistake. Another outstanding serious and misinterpretation
Speaker 1: of the Eda theme by Snorri and his modern followers,
Speaker 1: mistaking mere titles of the same personage for different people,
Speaker 1: for different individuals and resulting in hopeless confusion, is that,
Speaker 1: arising from Balder titles of Locally and the Wolf of
Speaker 1: Fen or Vaughan, our new literal translation makes it certain
Speaker 1: that nowhere in the Eda is Balder, the so called Balder,
Speaker 1: the son of Woden. Everyone's called good or beautiful, or
Speaker 1: even an assa or lord, a usual title of Thor
Speaker 1: and his Gothic heroes. On the contrary, Balder is called
Speaker 1: the baleful, the harrier, the ruffian, and is everywhere throughout
Speaker 1: the Eda represented as the villain of the narrative, the
Speaker 1: malicious son and champion of the malignant Woden, the inveterate
Speaker 1: antagonist of Thor, and as identical with the Wolf of
Speaker 1: Fen I'm assuming that's fen Rear, right, the giant wolf
Speaker 1: that you know supposedly swallows or it didn't, but that
Speaker 1: would actually be Thor. And then who was it who
Speaker 1: came who came in and snopped him? It was it
Speaker 1: was one of the sons. Anyway, it's still wrong. So
Speaker 1: the Wolf of fen and Loki the human historical original
Speaker 1: of Lucifer, and sorry, my phone did something. The Wolf
Speaker 1: of Fenn and Loki the human historical origin of Lucifer
Speaker 1: and the trant and of the Keelands Sarago and of
Speaker 1: the truculent green Man, as we shall see in the
Speaker 1: Arthur legend. Resuming now our construction of the Eda out
Speaker 1: of all this disordered tangle into which it has been
Speaker 1: thrown by Snorri and his modern followers, as a consistent
Speaker 1: epic by means of our new historical keys. This reconstruction
Speaker 1: was especially facilitated by the arresting lyrical lay entitled Volospa
Speaker 1: or spying or vision of the Volo or sibyl, the
Speaker 1: name Volo being supposed to be akin to the Greek
Speaker 1: sibyla or a sybil or prophetess, by erosion of its
Speaker 1: first syllable by B and V. Being freely interchangeable dialectically.
Speaker 1: This long legittedly the first, oh sorry, the finest of
Speaker 1: all edit poems. It is appreciatively called by Professor Kerr
Speaker 1: the noblest work of the Northern imagination, as he naturally
Speaker 1: accepted the current erroneous notion that the subject of the
Speaker 1: poem was mythological. As showing the traditional prime importance of
Speaker 1: this sybil vision lay, it was placed in the forefront
Speaker 1: of his collection by is that Simon, and similarly in
Speaker 1: the copy in the Codex Regis. Notwithstanding this traditional pre eminence,
Speaker 1: all the leading modern authorities on the EDA, from Yigfasen
Speaker 1: to and Powell to the very latest writers, each mechanically
Speaker 1: following the other, imagine it to be outside the scheme
Speaker 1: of the edit proper, and have relegated it to the
Speaker 1: end of their translations as allegorical or mythical. This basic
Speaker 1: at a lay, the Sybil's vision has hitherto been supposed
Speaker 1: to be a kind of world drama, having for its
Speaker 1: subject the mythical life of the gods and men from
Speaker 1: the beginning of the world till the crack of Doom Ragnarok,
Speaker 1: this last epoch which they thus mistranslate and meaning literally
Speaker 1: the rain or rule of reason. That's what Ragnarok is
Speaker 1: really supposed to be, apparently, not the crack of doom,
Speaker 1: but the rain or rule of reason. So they win
Speaker 1: not lose. They identify with the introduction of Christianity into
Speaker 1: Iceland and the belief that the Eda was originally composed
Speaker 1: by Icelanders, and this led in this way by the
Speaker 1: Edic writers of his day. Carlisle, in his glorification of
Speaker 1: Wooden and relegation of Thor to quite a subordinate position, wrote,
Speaker 1: some wild prophecies we have in the vluspa of the
Speaker 1: elder Edda. But they were comparatively an idle and adjunct
Speaker 1: of the matter. But Carlisle here, like his authorities, and
Speaker 1: like all Etic authorities ever since, took the husk ah.
Speaker 1: Notice how they said, husk. What we were just talking
Speaker 1: about with the freaking kabbala? The husks the husk woden
Speaker 1: and threw away the colonel. On the other hand, I
Speaker 1: early observed that this foremost of all the lays formed
Speaker 1: really the backbone and framework of the whole collection of
Speaker 1: the Eda poems, that it was in itself a fairly
Speaker 1: complete epics summary of the historical achievements of King Thor
Speaker 1: and contained nothing really mythical or supernatural, and that the
Speaker 1: rest of the detached edi poems were merely expanded detailed
Speaker 1: descriptions of leading episodes or incidents that were briefly summarized
Speaker 1: in the central poem. Further study fully confirmed this observation.
Speaker 1: This lay gets its present title of the Sybil's Vision
Speaker 1: from its having been latterly sung or recited by an
Speaker 1: official or professional sibyl or a wise woman, whom the
Speaker 1: early Icelandic Sagas described. Icelandic Sagas described as a lady
Speaker 1: of rank and education, and her personal appearance and dress
Speaker 1: are described in the appendix. She was held in high honor,
Speaker 1: and at the great autumn festivals of rejoicing, was seated
Speaker 1: on a high seat or throne, and sang her songs
Speaker 1: to the assembled nobles and populace. Her lay was called
Speaker 1: a vision, obviously because the old epic story is for
Speaker 1: the sake of vividness, composed in this particular lay in
Speaker 1: the present tense, with the words I see prefixed to
Speaker 1: most of the leading episodes and stanzas, as if the
Speaker 1: singer were an eyewitness of the great events passing before
Speaker 1: her eyes as in a vision of the past. This bardik,
Speaker 1: this bardic device of eyewitness and vision was also used
Speaker 1: by the Old Britain Welsh bard Talesan and I'm Sorry,
Speaker 1: the Anglo Saxon Beowulf, and others in their historical songs,
Speaker 1: not to mention Langlan's vision of peers and plowmen of
Speaker 1: the fourteenth century. The central Eda poem, discovered as the
Speaker 1: backbone and framework of the entire epic, is disclosed as
Speaker 1: the oldest form of the Eda epic and complete in itself.
Speaker 1: And it is, and in its refrain we seem to find,
Speaker 1: as seen later, the original form of the name Eda,
Speaker 1: which was laterally applied to the whole collection. Different manuscripts
Speaker 1: of this lay or its fragments, of which there are several,
Speaker 1: show significant differences in the sequence of its stanzas from
Speaker 1: that in the Codex Regions, and in some versions the
Speaker 1: sequences are better connected together than in the latter, Thus
Speaker 1: presuming that the Codex Regis was copied from several detached
Speaker 1: fragmentary manuscripts. WHOA, what the hell hold on?
Speaker 2: What the hell is that? What am I hearing?
Speaker 1: Did anyone else hear?
Speaker 2: That.
Speaker 1: What the hell I just heard clapping? Who was that from? Wait?
Speaker 1: Hold on? What was that? Did noone else hear the
Speaker 1: little clapping? I heard clapping? What the hell was that?
Speaker 1: Holy crap? That scared the crap out of it. Wasn't
Speaker 1: expecting that. What the hell? Wow? That was really strange. Okay, anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm trying to get back to it. But I was
Speaker 1: trying to figure out where that was coming from so
Speaker 1: I could stop the audio. It just started clapping. It
Speaker 1: must be something on stream yard because with Apple, remember
Speaker 1: how when doctor Glynnon would talk and he would raise
Speaker 1: his hands, the balloons would come up. I'm thinking maybe
Speaker 1: because I put my hands up, there was clapping or something.
Speaker 1: Though it didn't happen again, though, super strange anyway, what
Speaker 1: was I at before the collapping? It's kind of creepy? Uh,
Speaker 1: Let's see. Quidder's Preaches was copied from several detached fragmentary
Speaker 1: manuscripts in which the stanzas were not stitched together in
Speaker 1: their original and proper sequence, But our Sumerian and Indian
Speaker 1: historical keys enable us to restore such dislocated stanzas to
Speaker 1: their natural and original positions in sequence. In reconstructing the
Speaker 1: EDA Epic. Therefore, I have taken this central eta the
Speaker 1: Sibyl's vision as the framework of the Eda, and introduced
Speaker 1: in dovetail fashion the other scattered lays as a respective
Speaker 1: at the respective points where they or their associated scenes
Speaker 1: are referred to in this basic poem. The form of
Speaker 1: the epic as preserved in its central blay retains presumably
Speaker 1: something of the shape of the original epic as composed
Speaker 1: shortly after the great epoch of the rise of civilization
Speaker 1: around three hundred and eighty BC, which it celebrates. If
Speaker 1: this be so, its language has from time to time
Speaker 1: been modernized by generations of bards and handing down the
Speaker 1: old story through the ages to adapt it to the
Speaker 1: changes undergone and the evolution of the ancient speech. It
Speaker 1: has clearly descended in writing, as evidenced by its remarkable
Speaker 1: preservation of such a large number of the ancient personal
Speaker 1: names and the titles and place names in agreement with
Speaker 1: those of the ancient Samerian records. How interesting is that?
Speaker 1: So people are like, oh no, this is you know,
Speaker 1: British tale. This is oh no, this Icelandic tale. Now
Speaker 1: it goes all the way back to Samaria. Guys three
Speaker 1: thousand to here in ADYBC, and nowhere else except in
Speaker 1: the EDDA has now restored. Do we find preserved, either
Speaker 1: in Europe or in the East, any such complete tradition
Speaker 1: of the early history of the world and of Preadamite
Speaker 1: Man which will bear examination in the light of ascertains
Speaker 1: scientific facts pre Adamite Man. The property sorry the poetry
Speaker 1: or verse of the Eda is epic or heroic. It
Speaker 1: is couched in narrative form in which the dramatic element
Speaker 1: is introduced as impassioned harangs, with occasional dialogues and sometimes
Speaker 1: culminating and tragedy. The breathless flow of its narrative and
Speaker 1: adventure hold the hearers and readers continuous interest, and is
Speaker 1: obviously intended to excite the patriotism and heroic feelings of
Speaker 1: the audience, and to awaken your connection to your heritage
Speaker 1: in your past in celebrating the rise and establishment of
Speaker 1: civilization achieved by their greatest ancestral heroes. This should when
Speaker 1: we start getting into this deep, it should resonate with you.
Speaker 1: You should understand, like you know that the truth has
Speaker 1: a certain ring to it. It's not wishful thinking, it's
Speaker 1: not hopeful. It's because it is, and you know it,
Speaker 1: or you can't. Once you feel it and you hear it,
Speaker 1: you know it. You know it because it's like remembering
Speaker 1: something that you forgot. It's like part of you in
Speaker 1: some respect. The verse at times resembles that of the Ballad,
Speaker 1: though occurring many centuries before the supposed rise of the Ballad. Verse. Again,
Speaker 1: the diction is always simple and homely, terse and vigorous,
Speaker 1: couched in the language of ordinary life so as to
Speaker 1: be understood by the people. The language is obviously that
Speaker 1: of British Gothic, as distinguished from Anglo Saxon, and of
Speaker 1: a period shortly before the eighth century when Iceland was
Speaker 1: first inhabited by parties of Irish Scots and her brides,
Speaker 1: he breeds refugees. It is seldom embroidered with ornamental phrases yeah.
Speaker 1: Occasionally it is graceful. It is gracefully lyrical, as for example,
Speaker 1: when describing thor Is sings mighty much, and of the
Speaker 1: ruler kind newly born is he the peace worshiping man.
Speaker 1: He is of the earth, the mighty eye, all seeing
Speaker 1: eye corrupted right, corrupting the all seeing eye into making
Speaker 1: it something bad, the swallow of the cool sea, the
Speaker 1: sun of dreams. Like all he also had. I believe
Speaker 1: there's a there's a there's a hawk or falcon, right,
Speaker 1: and that would be you know what they call horace, right,
Speaker 1: the horus is the is the hawk god? Right, it's
Speaker 1: they make everything into something gross. Like all ancient poetry
Speaker 1: or verse, it differs sharply from the modern in its
Speaker 1: total absence of any rhyme or end jingles, a valuable
Speaker 1: aid emphasis and embellishment to poetic expression, which however, only
Speaker 1: came into general use in Europe about six centuries ago.
Speaker 1: The Edic verse depends for its rhythm and melody on
Speaker 1: its meter, and we'll skip over that part for now.
Speaker 1: The little thing a literative sentence, the last feature in poetry,
Speaker 1: being significantly called by Professor Kerr Gothic verse, and regarded
Speaker 1: by him as the source of all alliterative early British
Speaker 1: and Anglo Saxon verse. It is thus blank verse, with
Speaker 1: which with this difference that its verses are clearly separated
Speaker 1: and grouped together into stanzas, usually containing eight verses, though
Speaker 1: sometimes only six or even less. The meter of the
Speaker 1: edda is highly specialized. It is seen at its best
Speaker 1: in the central day the civils vision. It is constructed
Speaker 1: of very definite technical rules which must have taken a
Speaker 1: very long period for their evolution and maturity. Its flexible,
Speaker 1: melodious meter is not always fully reproduced in our well
Speaker 1: nigh literal translation, owing to the necessary replacement of some
Speaker 1: obsolete words, so they're not going to rhyme anymore, although
Speaker 1: there are fewer obsolete words to be replaced than in
Speaker 1: translating Anglo Saxon into English. A great deal of learned,
Speaker 1: of learned, and discursive, conflicting discussion, without telling much has
Speaker 1: been written on the subject of the edimeter. My own
Speaker 1: general analysis is as follows. The yetimerior moose generally in
Speaker 1: the sprightly swinging truchatic measure, which significantly was the favorite
Speaker 1: with Anglo Saxon, early English and Welsh bars, and which
Speaker 1: is still favored by many modern English poets. Each foot
Speaker 1: in the measure consists of two syllables. The first is
Speaker 1: set accented or long, and the second unaccented or short.
Speaker 1: The length of the lines has been a matter of
Speaker 1: dispute for in the old developments or parchments, in order
Speaker 1: to save space the lines are written in continuous written
Speaker 1: on continuously, but separation marks for sentences and verse endings
Speaker 1: and stanzas are supplied. Although in the older all right
Speaker 1: we could skip over the technicals. Let's se if can
Speaker 1: get I'm warned to what it reveals, okay, besides the
Speaker 1: trickaic matter of uh, Let's see, for instance, we have
Speaker 1: this fine flowing measure in the Atla the wounding of
Speaker 1: King Thor, called in this particular Stanza by his title
Speaker 1: of o Dar, corresponding to his Samerian and Babylonian one
Speaker 1: title of Adar, by the spiked stone weapon of Balder
Speaker 1: the Harrier, or Tie the son of Woden, the arch
Speaker 1: enemy of Thor. I might just go ahead and read
Speaker 1: this again when I get back. And they lived to
Speaker 1: something else then the hard broken chip, Oh, the harrier
Speaker 1: found a home in it's h a m me. But
Speaker 1: I figured out that that basically means the same thing
Speaker 1: as home my water. I let just use this one
Speaker 1: in home and King Odar moving that stilly spike stood
Speaker 1: sticking fast in Iroinrid's blood. So same guy, a different
Speaker 1: name for him. Right afterwards out it was niggled interesting
Speaker 1: word by Gifon's son Ale from the sore tie's red
Speaker 1: iron ore was got rid of the hell ball was quelled.
Speaker 1: Here Thor's title of I injury is spelled with some
Speaker 1: of its letters transposed by the copyist as a yan rid.
Speaker 1: Another sprightly springing sprightly swinging, but different measure is found
Speaker 1: in the way describing the training of King Thorp's son
Speaker 1: Khan in sports, the first verse of which run so
Speaker 1: con is Kane by the way, you want to hear
Speaker 1: that that's going to be interesting to try to relate
Speaker 1: to you. As caden Abel Cohn was the youngest assa
Speaker 1: in the n ode of the inn right in the
Speaker 1: end as up he waxed as an earl born, he learned,
Speaker 1: he learned horse taming, to fend by shields, shafts, to
Speaker 1: shape and shake ashen spears. The alliteration in the etic verse,
Speaker 1: which as Professor Kerr has shown, is of Gothic origin,
Speaker 1: is constructed on the highly developed artificial system according to
Speaker 1: definite rules. It affects the same initial letter and corresponding
Speaker 1: accent to syllable, and is usually distributed over two lines,
Speaker 1: two in the first line and another more complete in
Speaker 1: the second line. Significantly. This is also the rule in
Speaker 1: Old Brito Welsh verse and the Anglo Saxon of Kidman
Speaker 1: and other early Bards, and in Old English of Pierce Plowman.
Speaker 1: Let's see if in Gill again. So our new translation
Speaker 1: of the Edda is rendered as scrupulously literal as possible,
Speaker 1: and the temptation to attempt paraphrasing in it more picturesque
Speaker 1: modern English strenuously resisted, so as to recover the literal
Speaker 1: reading of this classic text in its own language as
Speaker 1: a historical document, and also to exhibit the radically radical
Speaker 1: affinity of the Edic language with the British and English.
Speaker 1: This fidelity to the letter of the Eda yields also
Speaker 1: fidelity to the spirit of that epic, owing to the
Speaker 1: Eda language being radically identical with Old English, or rather
Speaker 1: Old British. It is not, however, always practicable to give
Speaker 1: in the translations the full extent of the trochaic and
Speaker 1: other measures, and the full alliteration of the texts owing
Speaker 1: to several of the Edic words having become obsolete or
Speaker 1: their sense somewhat altered in modern speech. This necessitates the
Speaker 1: occasional use of better known modern synonym synonyms or phrases
Speaker 1: or idioms in order to render the meaning more intelligible
Speaker 1: without necessitating a reference to the glossary. Thus the opening
Speaker 1: verse of the Sibyl's Vision, which reads in the first
Speaker 1: with its first letter aspirated.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like look at that. That's that's old English. Yeah
Speaker 1: you could see how like yah, yeah, you'd be more
Speaker 1: confused reading it than you would if you didn't. He
Speaker 1: thought it was big eck al r helgar, kinder, meary
Speaker 1: oka or ok mini mogo. Yeah, what the hell does
Speaker 1: that mean?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: I have English with almost literal verbal agreement, allowing for
Speaker 1: the dialectic differences in modern spelling and obsolete words as listen,
Speaker 1: I bid ye all kindred on holiday, major and minor
Speaker 1: folk men of the homeedale. Oh well, now it makes
Speaker 1: a little bit more sense, doesn't it. It would be
Speaker 1: noticed that in the first line the edic barred. In
Speaker 1: order to preserve faithfully the trochaic measure, makes the second
Speaker 1: foot begin with the long extented Hey. Okay, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: we get all that. Oh here's the introduction, everybody. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: that's still the introduction. No, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, this
Speaker 1: is this is something that gets repeated the refrain or burden,
Speaker 1: recurring at the end of the most of the chief
Speaker 1: divisions of the central poem, and used to introduce pointed,
Speaker 1: pointedly fresh episodes. I have translated as as no ye
Speaker 1: know ye yet, the edda no ye yet at all.
Speaker 1: This refrain, from which forms only one line in the text,
Speaker 1: has hitherto been variously rendered or paaraphrase as no ye
Speaker 1: it but what no ye yet? Or what would ye
Speaker 1: know further? And what?
Speaker 2: But?
Speaker 1: None of these yield very good or literal sense. The
Speaker 1: word eta, which occurs in this in it in this refrain,
Speaker 1: has been translated in these cases as a conjunctive at
Speaker 1: a corresponding to the Latin and or I venture however,
Speaker 1: to suggest that this word eda really preserves the old
Speaker 1: traditional name for the epic poem, spelled with a single D,
Speaker 1: for the old Gothic runic letter D was sometimes written
Speaker 1: by the sign of a double D, and thus could
Speaker 1: yield for this word form of at, a title which
Speaker 1: seems first applied to this epic collection in the seventeenth century.
Speaker 1: The divisions of themes of this great epic celebrating the
Speaker 1: advent of Thor Air, Thor or Arthur or ad Adam
Speaker 1: into the righteous old world of savagery and debased, debasing,
Speaker 1: cruel superstitions, and his great Reformation, by which he established
Speaker 1: the first civilization with ordered government, systematic agriculture and industrial life,
Speaker 1: peace and goodwill and prosperity between about three three and
Speaker 1: eighty to twenty and three hundred and fifty BC are
Speaker 1: usually indicated in the central lay the Sybil's vision as
Speaker 1: separate scenes, though the latter word itself is not actually
Speaker 1: used therein, but only the introductory phase I see or
Speaker 1: I remember. I have, therefore, in using the Sybil version
Speaker 1: as the thread on which I strink together all the
Speaker 1: scattered at alays divided the great episodes in the reconstructed
Speaker 1: Epic into separate scenes, which I have numbered consecutively. And
Speaker 1: the list of these is given in the contents. And
Speaker 1: let's see, there's a little bit now, we're getting into
Speaker 1: the details. Here. Seen one which follows the prologue introducing
Speaker 1: Sybil the civil songstress in the audience of the Gothic
Speaker 1: Britain nobles and Lady of the Home Deale assembled at
Speaker 1: their Great Festival holiday, opens with a glimpse into the
Speaker 1: pre Adamite world. That old world is graphically pictured steeped
Speaker 1: in primitive savagery, and is it internecytros atrocities, foully stained
Speaker 1: by the widespread maiming and human fucking motherfucker in human
Speaker 1: sacrifice and debasing orgies. And this is this is from
Speaker 1: the cult. Right, Let's let's start it all over here.
Speaker 1: The old world of graph is graphically pictured steeped in
Speaker 1: primitive savagery, atrocities, foully stained by the widespread maiming and
Speaker 1: human sacrifice and debasing orgies and necromantic superstitions of the
Speaker 1: Mother Sun cult. Hm hm does that kind of ring
Speaker 1: maybe maybe maybe a little sting there for the whole
Speaker 1: I don't know the aspects that kind of translate over
Speaker 1: into Christian culture. Mother so cult, there's some there's some
Speaker 1: tamu stuff going on in and uh in in the
Speaker 1: esoteric readings of of the New Testament, just saying mother Son,
Speaker 1: call of the Serpent, Dragon and wolf. Those are the totems, right,
Speaker 1: Serpent dragon is a hyphen and wolf it discloses the matriarch,
Speaker 1: the matriarch, it's matrix society cal d as they spell
Speaker 1: it c h A L dee weird as like a
Speaker 1: wizard right, or like if it's a weird, it might
Speaker 1: be like the female like a sorceress, right, and her
Speaker 1: name is l so they even change that right in
Speaker 1: her paradise in the Garden of Eden, the shithole with
Speaker 1: all this shit going on was the Garden of Eden.
Speaker 1: That was their golden era. Their golden age was graphically
Speaker 1: pictured primitively savage troses, widespread maming, and human sacrifice to
Speaker 1: basing orgies. I guess that made it fun and superstition
Speaker 1: and witchcraft, right. Her paradise a paradise of a person
Speaker 1: like that in the Garden of Eden at karchemchur Carmish.
Speaker 1: There you go, or jib Durabilis on the Euphrates in
Speaker 1: Upper Mesopotamia, along with her sacred serpents and wolves, and
Speaker 1: her paramore Wooden and her only established son Balder in
Speaker 1: their hellish cellar or Hall of Va Hall Valhalla, remember
Speaker 1: and the three fate weirds. Again we're talking about wizards
Speaker 1: or sorceresses with their magic bull or cauldron. So listen
Speaker 1: to this magic bull or cauldron. What we talk about
Speaker 1: with that the quid of arms for Loyola, the two
Speaker 1: wolves and the cauldron. Where does this come from where
Speaker 1: are those people descended of? What are they trying to
Speaker 1: represent there in their symbolism as their family coud of
Speaker 1: arms of all things? Two wolves around the cauldron right
Speaker 1: at the well of urd under their tree of knowledge
Speaker 1: what they called it. See how everything's inverted to make
Speaker 1: them look like the and the way we're taught it.
Speaker 1: The graphic etic descriptions of this scene, as also of
Speaker 1: the subsequent scenes, are vividly illustrated and fully confirmed in
Speaker 1: their details by the concrete evidence of more or less
Speaker 1: contemporary and later Sumerian and Hittite sculptures and engraved seals,
Speaker 1: as well as by the traditional pictures of that primitive
Speaker 1: demonist mother cult mother cult matriarch preserved by the Egyptians
Speaker 1: and Indian branch of the Aryans. The remarkable technical excellence
Speaker 1: in the drawing and engraving of these ancient seals, dating
Speaker 1: from threey three hundred BC to two thousand BC will
Speaker 1: be appreciated when it is remembered that these drawings and
Speaker 1: engravings are each contained within the minute space of little
Speaker 1: more than one square inch, so that they have had
Speaker 1: to be often magnified in the illustrations by half or
Speaker 1: one diameter for or more easy reference. Scene two discloses
Speaker 1: the sudden meteoric advent into the grievously stricken, riotous old
Speaker 1: world of the greatest of all reformers and culture heroes,
Speaker 1: the tall, fair, redbearded thor Or Yendry, with his dirty, industrious,
Speaker 1: law abiding men of Gothic breed. A Sun worshiper, he
Speaker 1: reflects the shining brilliance of that luminary and becomes himself
Speaker 1: a fixed star in the fermentive civilization as and was
Speaker 1: afterwards deified as Indra or Jupiter, as the humanized type
Speaker 1: of God. Thor Or i Ad the first historical king
Speaker 1: in the ancient world, who, as I have demonstrated by
Speaker 1: concrete historical proofs in my previous works, Makers of Civilization,
Speaker 1: is what he's reverencing, and, as now fully established in
Speaker 1: the present pages, was the historical origin of Adam the
Speaker 1: Sun God or right right right of the New Testament,
Speaker 1: where however, as well as the in Genesis, his true
Speaker 1: history as the reformer of Eden is spitefully mutilated, spitefully
Speaker 1: mutilated by and who wrote the fucking book right want
Speaker 1: to keep it. I've been saying this before I even
Speaker 1: knew this, that they you can't trust any like? Did
Speaker 1: they lie about everything else? Are you going to trust
Speaker 1: them that? With that did the greatest tool of manipulation,
Speaker 1: spitefully mutilated, regenerates and transforms the riotous old world into
Speaker 1: a civilized, settled, law abiding, industrial, and habitable land thanks
Speaker 1: to him by his great uplifting crusade, under his banner
Speaker 1: of the Red Cross of his son worship and established,
Speaker 1: establishes civilization and thus affects the rise of man. This
Speaker 1: is what they call their dark Age, these evil fucks,
Speaker 1: because us descendants of the gosst the little you know
Speaker 1: torture party. The historical atom is now disclosed to have
Speaker 1: been not the first created man, but the first man
Speaker 1: who made men of men. I freaking love that freaking line.
Speaker 1: The historical atom is now disclosed not to have been
Speaker 1: the first created man, but the first man who made
Speaker 1: men of men. He is the protagonist of the attic epic.
Speaker 1: His noble, forceful and resourceful and inspiring personality with his
Speaker 1: traditional personal appearance of the tall, fair Nordic racial type
Speaker 1: majestic with a happy combination of brawn and brain, are
Speaker 1: vividly described in keeping with the more or less contemporary
Speaker 1: Sumerian and Hittite sculptures, engraved seals, and historical records. His
Speaker 1: building of the first town, establishment of agriculture, metal forges
Speaker 1: and other industries and town life, his go on, creation
Speaker 1: of the free institutions and of the first Parliament, and
Speaker 1: his message of brotherly love and the brotherhood of man,
Speaker 1: and abhorrence of the serpent and its mother, weird cult
Speaker 1: and blood sacrifices are graphically and dramatically narrated the place
Speaker 1: of his he found it repugnant. He put it into
Speaker 1: it noo for that shit. The place of his first
Speaker 1: appearance is located at Troy, in the Troad district of
Speaker 1: Mount Ida, bordering Dan Dar Dannel's Dar Daniels Dan right
Speaker 1: in northern Western Asia northwestern Asia Minor, and a tradition
Speaker 1: in a later scene refers to his having come from
Speaker 1: the Dan Danube valley in Middle Europe and an immemorial
Speaker 1: home of the Goths. This point of his advent and
Speaker 1: establishment of the first civil civilized state at Troy discloses
Speaker 1: him as the historical original of the first traditional king
Speaker 1: of the Greek Dar Danos, after whom the Dardanels are
Speaker 1: named for. Thor Or King Darr of the Simerian records
Speaker 1: bears in the Edda as well as in the Samerian
Speaker 1: the title of Dan the Homewarders. Tradition has placed him
Speaker 1: about two millennials millenniums later than his real date. He
Speaker 1: is also identified through the his etic title of Burmeoth
Speaker 1: Permit of Simerian and identical achievements with the historical original
Speaker 1: of the far famed Prometheus, who we also think is
Speaker 1: a bad guy. Right, they made everything fucking backward of
Speaker 1: the Greek legend who first because because we defeated them
Speaker 1: in order to bring the light right, because we we
Speaker 1: we gave h relief and prosperity to people and got
Speaker 1: rid of their problem that they were plagued by the
Speaker 1: fucking parasite, you know, sacrificial cult and sorcerers. You know,
Speaker 1: we stopped their reign. So now everything that did that
Speaker 1: was is the bad thing. And they point out and
Speaker 1: they put the demon face on it. Man, I had
Speaker 1: had this feeling in twenty twelve and everything seemed it's
Speaker 1: all I'm glad I read. I'm glad I read stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, glad I didn't just blow it off. Prometheus
Speaker 1: of the Greek legend who first brought fire to the
Speaker 1: to the domestic hearth of primitive men, and gave them
Speaker 1: the blessings of knowledge and civilization. And so he evoked
Speaker 1: the anger of the jealous, remember envy. These people are
Speaker 1: always going to be as old gods. And he too,
Speaker 1: with his wife Asia, was located by the Greek tradition
Speaker 1: in Asia Minor. So they're talking about Thor when they're
Speaker 1: describing Prometheus, and they probably don't even know. They probably
Speaker 1: just have the diet, you know, the story handed down
Speaker 1: to them. This Eedic account of the coming of King
Speaker 1: Thor Dar or ad or Adam and his establishment of
Speaker 1: civilization is profusely illustrated in these pages by early Sumerian
Speaker 1: and Hittite sculptures. It's that nice to get rid of
Speaker 1: all the freaking stupid superstition and just get to the
Speaker 1: reality of it and engraved seals, and is further confirmed
Speaker 1: by the ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, and Indian traditional records
Speaker 1: detailed in the appendix. And it is of especial Gothic
Speaker 1: significance that the Sumerian and Hittite portraits of the first
Speaker 1: King and his men and women folk represent them, usually
Speaker 1: in Gothic dress. Kind of a big giveaway there in
Speaker 1: wearing the horned hat of the Goths. Why did they
Speaker 1: put Moses in horns? Why did they do that? I wonder,
Speaker 1: because they stole the fucking story early Britain's Anglo Saxons
Speaker 1: and Norsemen of the Viking period. This because they're Moses
Speaker 1: didn't exist. The succeeding scenes arranged in the chronological sequence
Speaker 1: disclosed for civilizing the Aboriginal tribes. Not only of the
Speaker 1: Troad are Trode, but many also from Middle and Eastern Asia,
Speaker 1: minor as far as Lake Van and Armenia and even
Speaker 1: from Eden. Eden. They're saying that these idiots are these
Speaker 1: eating knights, these chldis, this cult, this wolf cult. That's
Speaker 1: where they lived, that's where they had their their their
Speaker 1: little dominion, who had flocked to his sun cross standard.
Speaker 1: He appoints them had been our chiefs from their own ranks,
Speaker 1: and he enfranchises and admits those tribal chiefs into his
Speaker 1: Gothic parliament. Not bad for somebody who just conquered those people,
Speaker 1: because those people were appreciative to be rid of those scum.
Speaker 1: They got the parasite, they got the tick, and they
Speaker 1: ripped the tick off into the Gothic parliament and commonwealth.
Speaker 1: He even sanctions the intermarriage of the regenerate chief with
Speaker 1: a Gothic maid. He established his weaving workshops at Troy.
Speaker 1: He has an adventure on a fishing excursion in the
Speaker 1: Troyad with his adversary Wooden the Edenite. The Wooden, the Edenite.
Speaker 1: They're rid there in serpent Wolf chief, who with his hordes,
Speaker 1: raids Troy and his factories. He repeated. The repeated raids
Speaker 1: on Troy by Wooden and his men forced Thor to
Speaker 1: conquer and annex Phrygia, or the land of Lions on
Speaker 1: the east to the borders of Cappadocia. In this expedition,
Speaker 1: and supported by his aboriginal allies, he encounters Amazonian warriorses
Speaker 1: from Eden, who wore skin coats and Edenite fashion that
Speaker 1: has again come into vogue since the war, as distinguished
Speaker 1: from the cloth tailor made garments of the Goths. And
Speaker 1: under his title of medi the assa bearing his son
Speaker 1: cross remember Saint George right right right Wooden standard. He
Speaker 1: vanquishes Wolden in a notable scene described in Wolden's Lament.
Speaker 1: At his defeat by the nine woods of Midday the Assa,
Speaker 1: which thus explains for the first time the nine Saint
Speaker 1: George's crosses on the prehistoric rock carving of the Midas
Speaker 1: Monument in the heart of Phrygia, and it also explains
Speaker 1: the contemporary portrait of the king Thor with his five
Speaker 1: horned headed cornhead dress taming civilization and the Phrygian lion
Speaker 1: totems on the archaic ivory carving figure Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: The next scene discloses. The next scenes disclosed Thor's conquest
Speaker 1: of Cappadocia, which is east of Phrygia up to the
Speaker 1: Euphrates and down through the Taurus to the seaboard of Celicia,
Speaker 1: his establishing his new chief capital at Vidhara Yeah Vidar
Speaker 1: was supposedly the sun that avenges and takes care of
Speaker 1: Fenria right Vidara and Teraria and bogas Koi in the
Speaker 1: heart of Cappadocia. As George of the Red Cross, the
Speaker 1: historical or original of Saint George of Cappadocia and England,
Speaker 1: his building and fortifying his capital there, which he calls
Speaker 1: him in him in h a Mn or Heaven, his
Speaker 1: judgment hall, his rowan apple tree of life Igdrasil as
Speaker 1: a symbol of the Sun, his establishing of baptism, and
Speaker 1: this is three thousand, four hundred years old or four
Speaker 1: hundred pc right baptism as the initiating right into the
Speaker 1: Sun cult. They're having concluded a treaty with the Edenites,
Speaker 1: whose central mother Weird's serpent shrine remember weird it means
Speaker 1: like wizard right serpent shrine and guarded on the Euphrates
Speaker 1: was now only a few days journey to the south
Speaker 1: of his borders. He is visited in his mountain capital
Speaker 1: by a party of weird vestals from Eden, including Eve.
Speaker 1: Oh isn't that interesting? Adam just met Eve to spy
Speaker 1: out his capital, and most of the episodes in these scenes,
Speaker 1: also from three onwards, are confirmed by the Samerian and
Speaker 1: Hittite sculptures and seals and Phrygian and Cappadocian monuments. The
Speaker 1: courtship and marriage of Thor or Airthor Arthur with Eve
Speaker 1: or Gunnifah or Gwenevere, the Eden vestal of the serpent
Speaker 1: Colt after her conversion by Thor to his son Colt,
Speaker 1: is dramatically described in the next scene, and significantly, the
Speaker 1: EDA account is in full agreement down to the most
Speaker 1: minute detail with the great prehistoric bass relief rock sculptures
Speaker 1: of that ceremony in your Pitaria or bogus Koi, which
Speaker 1: the EDA now interprets for the first time, and also
Speaker 1: in agreement with the Samerian, Greek, and Indian records of
Speaker 1: that ceremony. So this woman was an eden Nite, but
Speaker 1: she was of Gothic descent, is what they say. And
Speaker 1: she gets out of the Moon death cult as soon
Speaker 1: as she's aware of something better and less wicked, and
Speaker 1: she turns her back on him. She's down with Thor now.
Speaker 1: And that's the Randam and Eve Thori story, I said Thori,
Speaker 1: that kind of works though to Thori story of Thor Thori.
Speaker 1: When then follow the scenes with Eve at home in
Speaker 1: Thor's mountain capital of Heaven, which is him in right
Speaker 1: as queen consort of the Goths and as custodian of
Speaker 1: the life giving Rowan apples of the Sacred Tree, the
Speaker 1: birth and boyhood of Thor, Adam and Eve's son, the
Speaker 1: crown Prince gun or Khan or Cain or gowin Sir
Speaker 1: gowin right, the young prince Kin being treacherously wounded by
Speaker 1: the elder balder Or epley or Abel, the son of
Speaker 1: Woden and the eden Kite matriarch Cane's sucker succor by
Speaker 1: his mother Eve, who warns him against the treachery of
Speaker 1: the eden Knites and imparts it to him. On his
Speaker 1: initiation as a young soldier Red Cross Knight the Ten
Speaker 1: Commandments of his father Adam Thor. Oh Wow, where'd the
Speaker 1: ten commands come from?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: From some asshole named fucking Moses. Other scenes followed with
Speaker 1: an attack on Thor's bird by balder Abel his you know,
Speaker 1: composite name there and his men from the Van District
Speaker 1: of Eden and their holes, and having to pay an indemnity,
Speaker 1: Thor's defense of his Cappadocian frontier on the Euphrates up
Speaker 1: to the Garden of Eden, the almost fatal wounding of
Speaker 1: Adam Thor by the murderous stone missile of balder an
Speaker 1: incident seized on by the later Mother Cult Greek bards
Speaker 1: and magnified into the binding and wounding of Prometheus for
Speaker 1: rejecting the old gods.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: These people are all part of this fucking eden Knite
Speaker 1: cult that turned everything upside down and say, well, see,
Speaker 1: that's what happens when you get That's what you get
Speaker 1: when you turn your back on the gods, right, because
Speaker 1: there are a bunch of fucking demon summoners Thors saccurr
Speaker 1: and extraction of the missile by his son Cain Is
Speaker 1: being capsized in his ship off this Silesian coast by
Speaker 1: Balder or sut or seth right or set Able and
Speaker 1: punishment of latter as the source of the Babylonian legend
Speaker 1: of Adamu, the son of God capsized by Sutu and
Speaker 1: his revenge on a piece being again patched up. Adam
Speaker 1: Thorp visits the old matriarch weird El. See how they
Speaker 1: had to make this They had to make this tanak,
Speaker 1: They had to make these religions, They had to cover
Speaker 1: this shit up, and they had to completely invert all
Speaker 1: the properties and attributes of these things so that we
Speaker 1: would lose our fucking history and follow theirs in subjugation
Speaker 1: and superstition and fear of death and all this other bullshit.
Speaker 1: Emasculation on a peace being again patched up by Adam
Speaker 1: Thorp visits the old matriarch weird El at Eden, who
Speaker 1: recites to him his ancestry from the Western heirs or
Speaker 1: ariyans of the Ethel or Ethel and Dan clans. So
Speaker 1: what arians are? Did Dan clans?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: Okay? Also Eve's antlers three from the same Gothic clan
Speaker 1: stock right. He tells her that Eve's one of you,
Speaker 1: one of you guys, and taunts him with wishing to
Speaker 1: capture her central fetish magic stone, cauldron or holy Grail.
Speaker 1: During this piece, Balder or Loki or Lucifer of the
Speaker 1: Serpent dragon called visits King Thorpe's banquet hall at Vidhara
Speaker 1: or heaven right because it's called himen and right riotously
Speaker 1: or right yeah, quarreling there with his Gothic hoasts and
Speaker 1: following his foullally insulting clean Eve, he is cast out
Speaker 1: of that heaven by Gun or Cain or Mioch or
Speaker 1: Michael Son is also a compositive archangel, Michael disclosing the
Speaker 1: real traditional historical source. So mioc right, because there's no
Speaker 1: L there, That's why. That's that's almost like Mike. But
Speaker 1: the the micah l right, the l that bullshit, that
Speaker 1: Semitic bullshit that they added to it, like I'm I
Speaker 1: should be Danny or Dan not Daniel, disclosing the real
Speaker 1: traditional historical source of the casting out from heaven of
Speaker 1: the great dragon Lucifer or apollion able by Saint Michael,
Speaker 1: the archangel of the latter New Testament legend. So him
Speaker 1: kicking out this dude, right, Balder is mytholized. This is
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. Lucifer or Polyon also being you know, given
Speaker 1: to the value of Abel by Saint Michael, the archangel
Speaker 1: of the later New Testament legend, and also the earlier intruers.
Speaker 1: So this is where they pull all the ship from.
Speaker 1: Because they're not creative. They had to steal from someone else.
Speaker 1: They had to give themselves a history and a street
Speaker 1: that was just true enough, but completely upside down and
Speaker 1: backwards for people to resonate with it. Version of the
Speaker 1: expulsion of the Green Man from King Arthur's banquet Hall
Speaker 1: by the young Knight Sir Gawin in the Arthurian Legend.
Speaker 1: Subsequent scenes to exclose the binding of Balder Loki by
Speaker 1: Mioch or Michael or Caine, owing to his continued destructive
Speaker 1: raids on the Gothic territory. Balder's escaped from his fetters
Speaker 1: his kidnapping in revenge of Eve, whom he carries off
Speaker 1: to Eden. This to me sounds exactly like the raping
Speaker 1: of Europa, the stealing of Eve. He does Raper, and
Speaker 1: that is like like Zeus, because they fucked up that too,
Speaker 1: making Zeus to the bad guy and not Balder. But
Speaker 1: you know, Zeus carrying off he turns into a bowl.
Speaker 1: Balder kind of it's kind of interesting, right, takes it,
Speaker 1: takes her off, and that's the raping of Europa. King
Speaker 1: Thoris fury at this dastardly outrage and rape by Balder.
Speaker 1: His hurried crusade against Eden frequently called in the at
Speaker 1: Hell got Heaven and Hell working fighting together here right
Speaker 1: him and in Hell his entry there he enters Hell
Speaker 1: because he enters Eden bearing along with his invincible Stonemace,
Speaker 1: the sacred epiphytic ruin tree branch of his sun colt,
Speaker 1: now disclosed as the real origin of the golden Bow
Speaker 1: legend of Virgil and not the mistletoe, and also as
Speaker 1: the source of the old British and Scottish adage ruined
Speaker 1: tree and red threed guard. The witches talk their speed,
Speaker 1: take their speed, just tak Thor's rescue of Eve with
Speaker 1: the aid of Cain from the clutches of the Edenite Balder,
Speaker 1: here called in the EDA epley or Abel, Thor's physical
Speaker 1: punishment of the latter and his seizure and carrying off
Speaker 1: of the central fetish stone, magic bullet or witch's cauldron
Speaker 1: of Eden, which is what we call the holy Grail,
Speaker 1: which he then consecrates to his son call as the
Speaker 1: Holy Grail of King Arthur, which still exists with the
Speaker 1: Severian inscription of his great grandson, and the wounding of
Speaker 1: gun Or Caine during their victorious retreat by the stone
Speaker 1: missile of the pursuing Balder forum form other scenes the
Speaker 1: Great Battle of Eden, the most monumentous are Sorry, the
Speaker 1: most momentous and epoch making battle of the Old World
Speaker 1: forms the next scene. Furious at the loss of their
Speaker 1: central fetish bowl, Balder and his mother weird L muster
Speaker 1: all their Edenite swarms of Hordes by river, sea and
Speaker 1: land for a great battle against Thor, who, on hearing
Speaker 1: of it, musters along with Cain all their force of
Speaker 1: well disciplined Gothic Yeomen cultivators and their allies for the fray.
Speaker 1: Eden was accordingly sorry. Eden was, according to the Eda,
Speaker 1: defended by skinclad and wolf tailed men armed with flaming
Speaker 1: switches cherubims with flaming swords. The battle, which proved catastrophic
Speaker 1: for the Edenites, is described in lurid colors in the Eda,
Speaker 1: as in the Sumerian and Babylonian records. They got their
Speaker 1: asses stomped by our ancestors, rapacious little fucks. In the battle,
Speaker 1: Mioch or Mickley or Michael or Kine slays balder suit
Speaker 1: or Able. They're just telling you the other names that
Speaker 1: you can use it by right. The Dragon cult chief
Speaker 1: in single combat and avenges his father for the rape
Speaker 1: of Eve. Thus the Edda, which is also be called mom.
Speaker 1: Thus the Edda re covers at last the true history
Speaker 1: of the event, which has been so falsely misrepresented by
Speaker 1: the later Kalti literature. Yeah, I wonder why they did that,
Speaker 1: and reveals the historical source of the New Testament legend
Speaker 1: of Saint Michael slaying Apollion the Dragon, the Egyptian Horus
Speaker 1: of the Sun Cult slaying set or Seth, and Sir
Speaker 1: Gowain slaying the Green Man. It discloses the Sumerian origin
Speaker 1: of the title Tubule for Cain as the slayer of
Speaker 1: Ball and confirms his identity with Caine through the Hebrew
Speaker 1: tradition of his being the instructor of every artificer in brass,
Speaker 1: bronze and iron, and his traditional inventorship of the plow.
Speaker 1: This is talking about Threagon, or maybe that's tuoble Kena
Speaker 1: talk about it was also disguised tool. It also discloses
Speaker 1: the real historical source of the lemon tape of the Caldis,
Speaker 1: Oh they're pissi pants now, which modern writers mistakenly called
Speaker 1: the killing of the God. Yeah, nope, notwithstanding the villainy
Speaker 1: of balder Thor and his son and nobles sinking all animosities,
Speaker 1: gave his body a decent funeral. Everything that Balder did,
Speaker 1: this is the nobility of our people gave him, gave
Speaker 1: him a noble barial worthily without vengeance, as if their
Speaker 1: own brother. That's the fucking difference. What are they doing
Speaker 1: to people in Gaza right now? These same pieces of shit?
Speaker 1: Then follows the lament of the Caldis for the death
Speaker 1: of Abel, whilst other Caldis rejoice saying thanks only mon
Speaker 1: i greet dry tears. Only let hell hold what is
Speaker 1: what it has? Oh, that's awfully nice. These people are envious,
Speaker 1: evil pieces of shit. Some were happy, some were loyalists
Speaker 1: after the fact, but not the cult. Not the freaking
Speaker 1: dirt cult. The next scene in the is the pursuit
Speaker 1: of and capture of l the old serpent dragon matriarch
Speaker 1: who had met meanwhile escaped on the River Euphrates by boat. Hey,
Speaker 1: anybody who wants to tap one of those things and
Speaker 1: support the show, that'd be awesome. There's two little signs
Speaker 1: in the chat in FTJ media and then there's a
Speaker 1: little dollar sign at the bottom left hand corner. It's green.
Speaker 1: They could do a super chat through rumble, or you
Speaker 1: can hit one of the gifts and goes or buy
Speaker 1: something from the site. Just please help out Christmas time
Speaker 1: I can freaking out here. So are he the third
Speaker 1: all right, who had met meanwhile escaped on the River
Speaker 1: Euphrates by boat. He she was captured. So there's talking
Speaker 1: about ll now his mother, Balder's mother, Woden's wife. She
Speaker 1: was captured and slain by Thor or Gore or George,
Speaker 1: and in this scene she has represented Alec Gore as
Speaker 1: a serpent dragon itself or Tiamat. Think about the story
Speaker 1: of Tiamat, which I write about in my book priest
Speaker 1: Craft Beyond Babylon, which you can get on Amazon or
Speaker 1: Barnes and Noble. This is the Barnes and Noble version,
Speaker 1: and you can also get it on my website if
Speaker 1: you want me to sign it. But you can also
Speaker 1: get to the links for my website. So just go
Speaker 1: to the website, click the book, and then you'll see
Speaker 1: all the links. You can get it any way you want.
Speaker 1: That's the way you need it, any way you want it.
Speaker 1: All right. Let's see, she was captured and slain by
Speaker 1: thor O Gore, and I said dragon itself, of which
Speaker 1: she was the arch priestess, right, she was an arch
Speaker 1: priestess of the Serpent cult, and she and her conqueror
Speaker 1: are similarly represented in full agreement with all the editor
Speaker 1: details in the Egyptian version of the scene engraved on
Speaker 1: the alabaster sarcophagus of Seti the First, the father of
Speaker 1: Ramsey the Second in the Swaying Museum in London, and
Speaker 1: figured in the text, and also so as with other scenes,
Speaker 1: in agreement with the Samerian and Babylonian and hit type
Speaker 1: versions in sculptured seals and records, and in the Indian
Speaker 1: literary versions. Now here's the interesting thing, because this is
Speaker 1: where they write where everybody went, they took their histories
Speaker 1: with them, So the Indian, the Indus Valley, they took
Speaker 1: their histories with them. And it still confirms the same story.
Speaker 1: This recovers for us the historical originals of the of
Speaker 1: the scene and the personalities of the actors in Saint
Speaker 1: George Slaying the Dragon. So and this also shows where
Speaker 1: they had, where they held their where their people migrated,
Speaker 1: and where they the goth Slash area held kingdom, you know,
Speaker 1: domain dominion over over the the population. And it was
Speaker 1: always a fair one right, thankful for them to be
Speaker 1: their type of deal. It wasn't an animosity, wasn't anybody subjugated.
Speaker 1: It makes me laugh when they say the captive, the
Speaker 1: Babylonian captivity, Like who the fuck would want to keep
Speaker 1: you guys around? You honestly think they're like, no, no,
Speaker 1: keep them Jews here. Yeah, that's good for us. Nothing
Speaker 1: back could happen to that, Yes, because you're so sought after,
Speaker 1: your captive. If you fucking break, you don't work, you
Speaker 1: bitch about everything, By the help, wouldnybody need you for anything?
Speaker 1: It recovers the historical region of the end of the Day. Okay,
Speaker 1: this recovers for us the historical origins of the scene
Speaker 1: and the personalities. Did I miss something, sculpture sealed?
Speaker 2: Okay?
Speaker 1: Yeah, this recovers for us the historical originals of the
Speaker 1: scene and the personalities of the actors. In Saint George
Speaker 1: slaying the dragon figured on the royal insignia of the
Speaker 1: England of England and on British coins and in mid Europe.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, By the way, this also makes a really
Speaker 1: good Christmas gift priestcraft. Beyond Battle Syria and Nasia Minor,
Speaker 1: the next scene in the enthronement of Airthor or Arthur
Speaker 1: or Adam on the hill of Eden, or Arthur c
Speaker 1: to signalize his victory over Eden. With the speech he
Speaker 1: made on that occasion, This EDA record is in agreement
Speaker 1: not only with the Samerian versions, but also with the
Speaker 1: ancient Hittite sculpture actually found on this hill of Eden
Speaker 1: at Krsmish, which represents King dar Tur or Thor enthroned
Speaker 1: there as represented in the photograph in the text, and
Speaker 1: he shows he tells you where to find it. In
Speaker 1: the book and the Anglo Saxon Bard Cabman still retained
Speaker 1: the genuine old tradition that Adam was enthroned in Eden
Speaker 1: on the firm set throne formerly occupied there by Lucifer
Speaker 1: or Satan, which is what they attributed to Wodin and
Speaker 1: Balder his son. The Reformation and regeneration. This is the
Speaker 1: good times. This is the real good times, not the
Speaker 1: inverted bad times that these freaking scumbags that run our
Speaker 1: world now talk about. Oh, they lost their Golden Age. No,
Speaker 1: this was the beginning of the goddamn Golden Age. The Reformation.
Speaker 1: This is why fuck purple haze bullshit. None of that
Speaker 1: even matters. The reformation and regeneration of Eden by Adam
Speaker 1: Thor and the conversion of that serpent cult abode into
Speaker 1: a utopian city of God forms the next scene. The regenerate,
Speaker 1: regenerative Edenites were freely admitted on equal terms into the
Speaker 1: Aryan fellowship and commonwealth of that transformed city state. And
Speaker 1: it was from this advanced, advanced post of King Adam
Speaker 1: Thorp's Cappadocian Empire at the head of northern end of
Speaker 1: the Euphrates plane, that King Thor's son Kin descended in
Speaker 1: the twelfth year of his reign three three three six,
Speaker 1: three thousand zeer and thirty six PC into Mesopotamia of
Speaker 1: the Caldis and annex the civilized and civilized it down
Speaker 1: to the seaboard of the Persian Gulf, building as his
Speaker 1: chief Mesopotamian capital the city of Enoch or Unuk or
Speaker 1: Erech on the Euphrates, and so named after his son
Speaker 1: and success sor the third Aryan or Samarian king, who
Speaker 1: they're saying was named Enoch, and his epoch making advent
Speaker 1: into Mesopotamia is now disclosed to be what Assyrio ologists
Speaker 1: have called the coming of the Samerians. Though who the
Speaker 1: Samerians were, what was their race, where they came from,
Speaker 1: and what their date have hitherto all been unknown until
Speaker 1: now disclosed, right because they would sure as hell weren't
Speaker 1: going to say they weren't Semitic. The EDA ends here
Speaker 1: with the utopia or Golden Age, the real fucking golden
Speaker 1: age of early civilization, established by King Adam for about
Speaker 1: three three hundred and fifty BC. What additional pregnant Stanza
Speaker 1: has been added, presumably by a later hand. Human nature
Speaker 1: being what it is, Progress is not always forward, but
Speaker 1: sometimes and it says forward forward, I am backward downward too,
Speaker 1: into the abysm. There was, some time after King Adam
Speaker 1: Thorpe's death, presumably several generations later, a reactionary revival of
Speaker 1: the Aboriginal mother son cult of matriarchy, with its blood sacrifices,
Speaker 1: fetish worship, and superstition of hell, thus resulting in the
Speaker 1: real fall of man in the post Adami period. Oh look,
Speaker 1: here comes religions, Here comes Abrahamic religions. Oh, there was
Speaker 1: a resurgence in that. Huh gee, I can't imagine that.
Speaker 1: That doesn't seem like there's any indication or symptoms of
Speaker 1: that right now, does it. The Kaldze body, the Caldz.
Speaker 1: It's the fucking cults. It's this fucking cult that's who
Speaker 1: they're calling Jews now, and any any shield will do
Speaker 1: as long as they can, you know, throw rocks at
Speaker 1: you and shoot at you from you know, behind their
Speaker 1: their sofa where they cry and pretend that they're in.
Speaker 1: They they need a safe space because of the victim,
Speaker 1: the Chaldean Semites and their reactionary religion, whilst discarding the
Speaker 1: atomist worship of the one God in Heaven represented. Let
Speaker 1: me say that again the Chaldean Semites in their reactionary
Speaker 1: religion while discarding the atomist worship of the one God
Speaker 1: in Heaven. Well that doesn't that seems like they tell
Speaker 1: us the exact opposite, doesn't it. The Pagans were multiply
Speaker 1: blah blah blahs uh huh, represented by the Benign Sun
Speaker 1: or the God of the Sun and light of the
Speaker 1: world walda from the freaking or Linda y'all father, the
Speaker 1: god the god that they just say, Hey, the son's
Speaker 1: representation of what this dude here who creates things can create,
Speaker 1: So we venerate that in our appreciation of God. And
Speaker 1: they don't sacrifice anything to it because they're not fucking
Speaker 1: mental patients, not at first anyway, until they got corrupted
Speaker 1: the kill they Ansomites in direction represented by the Benign
Speaker 1: Owner as the universal power of nature. On reverting to
Speaker 1: their old Mother Son cult as and its sanguinary demons
Speaker 1: got to have them. They missed their demons now deified
Speaker 1: their Moon of darkness and converted their demons personified as
Speaker 1: the Mother Matriarch and her son and serpent wolf totems
Speaker 1: into gods and goddesses. Where do you think Lilith comes
Speaker 1: from this is a matriarchical society by borrowing the idea
Speaker 1: of God as well as the God name from their
Speaker 1: Aryan civilizer and great benefactor, Adam Thor. They borrowed the
Speaker 1: idea of God as well as the God name from
Speaker 1: their Aryan civilizer and greet Ben. They didn't know about
Speaker 1: shit until we came. That's what that states right there.
Speaker 1: They didn't know shit about shit. They took ideas and
Speaker 1: bastardized them for their own means, their own ends, and
Speaker 1: so it goes ever since. They then vilified and cursed
Speaker 1: the audacious King Adam Thor, the friend of man with
Speaker 1: his cult of Heaven, along with his noble heroic son
Speaker 1: Prince Kan the former for his great offense and sin
Speaker 1: of uplifting man by knowledge and disobeying the jealous Preadamite
Speaker 1: serpent demon and its ocular priestess, and the latter for
Speaker 1: slaying the serpent cult necromantic priest and sacrificer the only
Speaker 1: son of the weird, and abolishing their sanguinary sacrifices. And
Speaker 1: this spiteful vilification has been actively and mechanically propagated down
Speaker 1: through the ages to the present day in Semitic creeds.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, the ruling race of the Samerians
Speaker 1: or Arians, who formed only a relatively small proportion or
Speaker 1: super stratum of the mixed population in their empires in
Speaker 1: Mesopotaania and elsewhere, carried on the good work of Adam
Speaker 1: Thorpe's reformation and continued to be more or less monotheistic
Speaker 1: sun worshippers, or became worshippers of the deified Indhara or
Speaker 1: zax Zeus or ea Jah or jove He as for
Speaker 1: you get Jovah from, but that was also corrupted by
Speaker 1: these fucking semis comes. Right, These were all also just
Speaker 1: different names for thor when he was deified as the
Speaker 1: heavenly King, and some of them laterally deified his titles
Speaker 1: mystically as separate personages, and also deified his queen consort
Speaker 1: remember Gwenevere or Eve, and his son Kane remember or Michael,
Speaker 1: though the purer Arians treated his canonized son merely as
Speaker 1: an archangel, Saint Michael. Hence we have today the paradox
Speaker 1: that the self same people in our British isles who
Speaker 1: blindly swallow those Semitic calumnies against the first and noblest
Speaker 1: of all epoch making kings, the aryan establisher of the
Speaker 1: world's civilization, the first bringer of just government, peace and
Speaker 1: goodwill to men, the first apostle of brotherly love, the
Speaker 1: deliverer of the week from the oppressor, the knitter together
Speaker 1: of men into nations, and the uplifter of man and
Speaker 1: against his queen and heroic son, under their titles respectively
Speaker 1: of Adam, Eve and Kane. Yet at one and the
Speaker 1: same time glorify all unknowingly these self same personages under
Speaker 1: their own names or titles. Thus they canonize the that
Speaker 1: first King under his titles of Saint George of Cappadocia
Speaker 1: and England with his red Cross also been corrupted right
Speaker 1: and his and as the dragon slayer right because he
Speaker 1: was the Serpent, the serpent cult slayer, as Saint Andrew
Speaker 1: of the Cross, the patron saint of the Scots and
Speaker 1: of Gothlin, Scythic Russia, Hungary and the Danube Valley with
Speaker 1: its Andreas Island and Burgundy of the Visigoths, and admire
Speaker 1: him as King Arthur and as Jack the Giant Killer,
Speaker 1: not to mention his classic heroic titles of Prometheus, Zeus,
Speaker 1: Jove and Dardanos. They glorify or admire his queen consort
Speaker 1: as Guinevere and under her classic titles of Hira or
Speaker 1: Juno Athene or Eurytus, and his coron prince they admire
Speaker 1: as the majestic Dionysus. Isn't that something, Bacchus gayan Issus,
Speaker 1: all things corrupted and turned into shit in honor as
Speaker 1: Sir Gawain, the foremost of Red Cross Knights, the vanquisher
Speaker 1: of the fearsome truculent green Man, and canonized and adore
Speaker 1: him under his title of Saint Michael the Archangel, the
Speaker 1: Vanquisher of the Dragon, and Pollyon the Old Serpent Saintans.
Speaker 1: So over the over time they've infiltrated, co opted, subverted
Speaker 1: and destroyed, corrupted and made ugly all these all these things,
Speaker 1: all these all these places sources of inspiration, tarnishing it
Speaker 1: with themselves and their own disgusting behavior, so that when
Speaker 1: you look back in history, you say to yourself, everybody's
Speaker 1: fucking crazy. There's not a single decent human being anywhere
Speaker 1: to be found. Every type of the every type of
Speaker 1: God that these people venerated. Have something horrible that they do.
Speaker 1: They sacrifice children, They they do some kinding with with
Speaker 1: a with a virgin they get, you know, they whatever
Speaker 1: it is. But they have these festivals that where they
Speaker 1: murder a bunch of people like what the that was
Speaker 1: all introduced by these chaldy and cocksuckers over time as
Speaker 1: they subverted them all. And of course when you have
Speaker 1: the when you play the finance game, you get to
Speaker 1: write and rewrite things and be the the advisors to
Speaker 1: the kings for how things should be carried out and
Speaker 1: worshiped and everything else, and the and these three are
Speaker 1: now disclosed as identical, respectively. So what they're saying now
Speaker 1: is Sir Gwa and Michael the Archangel and George are
Speaker 1: Antonysis and all the and these three are now disclosed
Speaker 1: as a respectively with the leading hero, his Queen and
Speaker 1: Crown Prince of our great ancestral and national epic of
Speaker 1: the ancient Birds of the Eeda, even in the late
Speaker 1: Shadowy King Arthur legend in England, and analogous fashion of
Speaker 1: deprecation of the central hero, his Queen and Crown Prince
Speaker 1: has steadily developed amongst the later English romancing bards in
Speaker 1: the Great License. Yes, they taught us to hate ourselves
Speaker 1: and talk shit about our fucking heritage English romancing bards,
Speaker 1: and the great license they have taken with the ancient
Speaker 1: historical tradition, following somewhat the same lines as the spiteful,
Speaker 1: perversive propaganda of the Mother Son cult, what do you
Speaker 1: think creates a society and the education guys? This deprecation
Speaker 1: as regards King Arthur was already beginning to show itself
Speaker 1: in the time of Sir Thomas Mallory, and evoked from
Speaker 1: him in his La Morte de Arthur eight fourteen eighty five,
Speaker 1: the falling indignant protest in the quaint Old English speech
Speaker 1: of his day. Thus was sire or sir? Thus was
Speaker 1: with sir with a Why? Thus was Sir Arthur depraved
Speaker 1: and evil? Say? It said? Of so they're saying shit
Speaker 1: about Sir Arthur. Low yee, all Englishmen, see ye not
Speaker 1: what a mischief there here was? For he that was
Speaker 1: the most the most king and knight of the world,
Speaker 1: and most loved and loved the fellowship of noble knights.
Speaker 1: And by him I have to read change this because
Speaker 1: it's written in Old by him. They were all upholding.
Speaker 1: Now might not his Englishmen hold them contented with him?
Speaker 1: Alas this is a great default of us english Men,
Speaker 1: for there may no thing please us, no term, no
Speaker 1: length of time. So yeah, there he was noble in
Speaker 1: the detruction about them. That's basically the perversion of the
Speaker 1: King Arthur legend not only degraded the traditional high moral
Speaker 1: character of King Arthur himself and his queen and his
Speaker 1: crown prince Sir Gowan, but also at the same time
Speaker 1: fictitiously exalted his inveterate aboriginal caldi enemies. Wow, isn't that interesting. Thus,
Speaker 1: the felonious Balder and his truculent father Woulden were whitewashed
Speaker 1: and thrust as leading red Cross knights or kings into
Speaker 1: the brilliant company of King Arthur's heroes, right poisoning it.
Speaker 1: Poisoning it and because then now they have those same characteristics,
Speaker 1: and even the mother Weird herself was introduced there, thus
Speaker 1: hopelessly distorting the entire scheme and epic of and falsifying it.
Speaker 1: This melody miss medley of these personalities and their characters
Speaker 1: seem to have arisen partly through the misreperens misinterpreting several
Speaker 1: titles of Thor and his son and of Balder Wolden
Speaker 1: and his weird paramar, which is weird again, remember talking
Speaker 1: about which is fucking shit like that, right, We're talking
Speaker 1: about sorcerers, witchcraft priestcraft, which had still been floating about
Speaker 1: in medieval England attached to the Arthur legend, but with
Speaker 1: the characters of their owners blurred or more or less forgotten.
Speaker 1: Those titles were evidently imagined by the later Romancing English
Speaker 1: bars to represent different personages in the retinue of King Arthur,
Speaker 1: just as the later Icelandic and Scandinavian bars had imagined them,
Speaker 1: and were thus used to swell the galaxy of named
Speaker 1: kings and ladies in King Arthur's court. Thus, for instance,
Speaker 1: in the later version of the Arthurian Legend, we have
Speaker 1: clearly balder Ball fall or Vall of the Fiery Lance
Speaker 1: of Eotin and the Vana Like under the duplicate titles
Speaker 1: of Percy, Perceval and Parceval for or Wolf Vall or Ball,
Speaker 1: who saw the Grail and and as Lancelot of the
Speaker 1: Lake with his etic abduction of air Thor's queen, represented
Speaker 1: merely as an illicit armor amoir. But significantly he loses
Speaker 1: sight of the Grail because he betrayed Queen Guinevere, just
Speaker 1: as in the Etic and the Eda Epic, ball Or Balder,
Speaker 1: who carried a lance, loses the material grail as a
Speaker 1: punishment for his abduction of Thor's Queen Guineafo or Guinevere. Similarly, similarly,
Speaker 1: Bald's barreled Balder's boy. Similarly, Balder's father wouldn't of the
Speaker 1: one dragon Colt, who was miscalled o Tar by the
Speaker 1: Ladder by the later Islam against sanadon even bards, and
Speaker 1: made by then the father of Thors, called in the
Speaker 1: later Arthurian legend Uther Pendragon, and also made the father
Speaker 1: of Arthur. That kind of sucks something a little bit,
Speaker 1: doesn't it. The paramar avoiding the old mother of Serpent
Speaker 1: dragon Weird, made by later Icelanders and Scandinavians the mother
Speaker 1: of Thor under the her Edic name and title of
Speaker 1: el el Mayer the Fay spell which jord Or egro
Speaker 1: Ing appears to be the late Uthurian legend, variously as
Speaker 1: Elaine the Enchantress, Morgan el Fay and Egring, and I
Speaker 1: said the latter as the wife of Luther Pendragon, and
Speaker 1: also made the mother of Arthur again Serbors who achieved
Speaker 1: the grail and who was the special defender of Queen
Speaker 1: Gwenevere is clearly coined from King Thor's etic The Samerian
Speaker 1: title of Burr right, so still still Thor and Sir
Speaker 1: Ector is also clearly coined from air Thor's addict title
Speaker 1: Egther and Sir Agravian. The so called brother of Godwin
Speaker 1: was presumably a memory of the later Ladder himself under
Speaker 1: his edict title Eiger or Eager. So just because he
Speaker 1: changed the names, like, oh, that's a different person, I
Speaker 1: gotta make a new character. We're good for now. We
Speaker 1: just went to pay ad. I'm sure I did, like
Speaker 1: four hours today. What the hell did I do? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Jesus Jones? Three hours? All right? That's it. Why is
Speaker 1: the whole scream missing? You guys been on the whole
Speaker 1: time a lot? Go back to this Where did everybody go? Okay?
Speaker 1: I hope everybody was hearing it, because that would suck
Speaker 1: if you didn't, that would suck a lot. Look better
Speaker 1: than I'm really tiny like that. Yep, all right, So anyway,
Speaker 1: support the show anyway you want to. You know, there's
Speaker 1: this thing out there. It's on the website. Simperfrylc dot com.
Speaker 1: So is everything else that is that I have there?
Speaker 1: And what else? The creating the sauces? And then also
Speaker 1: you can look into details and the description or if
Speaker 1: you can click that little thing, you know, that little thing.
Speaker 1: I'll share the little thing a lot. Find other thing
Speaker 1: you're thinking of, because you're probably able to remind if
Speaker 1: you go right here, let me show you magic trick.
Speaker 1: You click this thing right here? Wait, is my head
Speaker 1: right in the fucking way? Hold on? I bet it is? No,
Speaker 1: it's not. Okay, good, so see that? So which idea?
Speaker 1: What happened? What did I just do? Hold on? Shay
Speaker 1: it again? How do I go?
Speaker 2: Okay?
Speaker 1: Oh you gotta hit it again? Okay, so that's how
Speaker 1: you So if you click this, but uh, then you
Speaker 1: can put it in whatever you are d D and
Speaker 1: then did me do that? And then you can go
Speaker 1: ahead and send away your thing and there's all kinds
Speaker 1: of stuff in there and that'd be awesome. Okay. There's
Speaker 1: also I think it's a button in here that allows
Speaker 1: you to subscribe. Yes, there's that button too. That's that's
Speaker 1: for like five a month. But you might as well
Speaker 1: just go to the Patreon and do that. That way,
Speaker 1: there's something coming back to you for this certification. Say
Speaker 1: it wonder. Oh that's okay, that's not the big Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I put some most stuff on there yesterday. I put
Speaker 1: a bunch of videos in different various places yesterday. Some
Speaker 1: of the stuff was not for this particular channel. Stuff.
Speaker 1: But yeah, all right, so there we go. Now, you know,
Speaker 1: and if you're on FTJ, you can rock and roll
Speaker 1: it right up here in the corners. Here there's a
Speaker 1: tip for the wallet, and then there's that goes to
Speaker 1: my gifts and go all right anyway, just how to
Speaker 1: show that because it's just coming on. We have less
Speaker 1: than less than thirty days before Christmas. Ah right, so
Speaker 1: you know, hot sauce makes a really great socking suffer
Speaker 1: in a book for a dad or for something like that,
Speaker 1: give me a break you want it? Oh yeah, And
Speaker 1: there's also the money Treat Publishing dot Com packslash Shop
Speaker 1: Coldball e aaoh ten percent off. It's like all five
Speaker 1: fingers on both hands. Seilire