1
00:00:08,519 --> 00:00:12,560
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. You're listening to Gambling with an Edge. Now

2
00:00:12,599 --> 00:00:17,640
here are your hosts, Bob Dancer and Richard Munchkin. Good afternoon,

3
00:00:17,839 --> 00:00:20,519
Welcome to Gambling with an Edge. I'm Bob Dancer.

4
00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:21,559
Speaker 2: And I'm Richard Munchkin.

5
00:00:22,399 --> 00:00:26,399
Speaker 1: In one of our irregularly scheduled podcasts, today, we interview

6
00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:31,839
gambling tax expert Russell Fox in an episode primarily dedicated

7
00:00:31,879 --> 00:00:35,359
to how the new tax bill affects gamblers and what

8
00:00:35,439 --> 00:00:39,320
we can do about it. Russell Fox, Welcome to Gambling

9
00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,679
with an Edge. Glad to be here, Glad to have

10
00:00:42,759 --> 00:00:46,640
you here. Let's get right into it. How does the

11
00:00:46,719 --> 00:00:49,880
latest tax bill affect gamblers?

12
00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:54,600
Speaker 3: Well, the bill is actually the Porcheawne. Gambling incredibly simple

13
00:00:55,039 --> 00:00:59,280
and roughly ninety five percent of gamblers, but not ninety

14
00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:03,600
five percent of your listeners won't be impact for amateurs.

15
00:01:03,719 --> 00:01:08,200
Take your gambling losses multiplied by ninety percent, and those

16
00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:13,079
are your tax gambling losses. Further, gambling losses remain only

17
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:17,159
deductible to the amount of winnings. Effectively, if your gambling

18
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,560
losses are one hundred and eleven percent of gambling winnings,

19
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:23,640
you will not be impacted by this law. Or know

20
00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:27,439
more than one hundred and eleven percent two. Most amateur

21
00:01:27,439 --> 00:01:30,480
gamblers lose at least one hundred and eleven percent of

22
00:01:30,519 --> 00:01:36,280
gambling winnings. For professional gamblers, gambling related business expenses are

23
00:01:36,359 --> 00:01:40,280
considered in the same category as losses, you only get

24
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:46,280
ninety percent of them. This law will especially hurt high volume,

25
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:52,079
low margin gambling. Sports betting, and certain advantage play unfortunately,

26
00:01:52,159 --> 00:01:55,599
will be hit under this new measure, which goes into

27
00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:59,000
effect for the twenty twenty six texture, does no impact

28
00:01:59,079 --> 00:02:03,920
on twenty five. A contemporaneous gambling log is a musk,

29
00:02:04,439 --> 00:02:08,759
either written on paper or using an app. Gamblers who

30
00:02:08,879 --> 00:02:12,199
use the session method will be less impacted than gamblers

31
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:16,960
who don't. Additionally, neither the IRS nor the tax court

32
00:02:17,319 --> 00:02:19,919
have any sympathy for gamblers who don't have a log.

33
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,400
Speaker 1: As a video poker player, I play perhaps one hundred,

34
00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:28,479
excuse me, one thousand hands per hour. Some I score on,

35
00:02:28,759 --> 00:02:32,360
some I don't, Some I break even on In some games.

36
00:02:32,479 --> 00:02:36,120
Sometimes I collect less than my initial wager. At the

37
00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:39,080
end of my session at a particular casino, I record

38
00:02:39,159 --> 00:02:44,039
my score plus or minus along with any w twog's accumulated.

39
00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,159
How is this recording system affected by the new law.

40
00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:51,840
Speaker 3: It's not that is exactly what you're supposed to do,

41
00:02:52,039 --> 00:02:55,400
other than you have to use the session method. It's

42
00:02:55,439 --> 00:02:59,080
allowed for various court cases, such as Park v. Commissioner.

43
00:02:59,639 --> 00:03:02,680
What you leave the casino with less what you begambling.

44
00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:07,080
Let's say you have twenty thousand of w twogs for

45
00:03:07,159 --> 00:03:09,879
the session, but your win is only three thousand dollars,

46
00:03:10,159 --> 00:03:13,159
and you note both, along with all the other required

47
00:03:13,199 --> 00:03:19,639
items for a gambling law date, casino name, start, end, times, result,

48
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,759
game you're playing, and if you ever play a table

49
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:26,039
game the table. When you prepare your tax return, you

50
00:03:26,039 --> 00:03:28,319
will need to note that you have twenty thousand of

51
00:03:28,479 --> 00:03:30,800
w twogs because you have to match what the IRIS

52
00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,439
has on file for you, and you take as an

53
00:03:33,479 --> 00:03:38,240
adjustment income the seventeen thousand dollars of gambling losses in

54
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:41,520
the same session. You probably are going to need to

55
00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:45,439
attach IRIS Form eighty two seventy five to your return.

56
00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:49,000
That's a disclosure statement, and then you're left with your

57
00:03:49,039 --> 00:03:51,319
three thousand dollars of gambling winnings.

58
00:03:51,759 --> 00:03:55,800
Speaker 2: Okay, so what about say you're a sports better and

59
00:03:56,360 --> 00:04:00,719
you bet you know on eight or nine different football games,

60
00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:04,960
in the course of a day. Maybe you also have

61
00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:11,400
some some parlays in there. Maybe you add in some

62
00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:15,719
in game betting during that and you make these bets

63
00:04:16,199 --> 00:04:22,040
at six or eight different sports books. That is that

64
00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:27,839
day your session. Is every sports book a session. How

65
00:04:27,879 --> 00:04:31,800
does a sports better deal with this? Well, we don't

66
00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:34,839
know for sure because there is no case law on

67
00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:39,639
sports betting. Sports betting has expanded drastically in the last

68
00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:43,279
few years. It takes a long time for cases to

69
00:04:43,399 --> 00:04:44,759
make it into.

70
00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:50,560
Speaker 3: The cort system. So with nothing in the definition of

71
00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:54,759
tax code, we have to use both of the dictionary

72
00:04:54,759 --> 00:04:57,879
and common sense to determine what we can combine into

73
00:04:57,959 --> 00:05:01,680
the same session for sports betting. First, the idea that

74
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:03,879
a session is going to last the entire year a

75
00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:08,720
month is laughable. That has no chance of being upheld

76
00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:11,759
at an audit. Don't try it. Try If you try

77
00:05:11,759 --> 00:05:15,639
to say, oh, it's the entire NFL season, baseball season, whatever,

78
00:05:15,879 --> 00:05:19,959
it is not going to work. But clearly related wagers

79
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:23,800
should be part of the same session. Consider betting on

80
00:05:23,879 --> 00:05:27,000
a baseball game at Wrigley Field with the wind blowing

81
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,839
out and the opposing picture being a notorious fly ball

82
00:05:29,879 --> 00:05:32,920
pitcher while the Cubs pitcher is a ground ball pitcher.

83
00:05:33,399 --> 00:05:36,079
Betting on both the Cubs and the over for runs

84
00:05:36,399 --> 00:05:40,040
being part of the same session makes sense, and probably

85
00:05:40,079 --> 00:05:43,040
it can be combined. But betting on the Cubs game

86
00:05:43,079 --> 00:05:45,959
in the White Sox game must they're playing each other

87
00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:50,079
like we won't be part of the same session. When

88
00:05:50,079 --> 00:05:53,800
a statute is undefined, courts look at the dictionary definition

89
00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:56,920
for guidance of the meaning of a word. One of

90
00:05:56,959 --> 00:06:01,920
the definitions of session is a single continuous course or

91
00:06:01,959 --> 00:06:05,160
a period of lessons, study, et cetera. In the work

92
00:06:05,199 --> 00:06:09,279
of a day at school. Now there is a period

93
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:13,040
of time during which a group of persons meets to

94
00:06:13,319 --> 00:06:18,319
pursue a particular activity. Both imply something with the discrete

95
00:06:18,399 --> 00:06:22,600
beginning and end. The IRS Chief Council's Office came out

96
00:06:22,639 --> 00:06:25,560
with a ruling about re entry poker tournaments a few

97
00:06:25,639 --> 00:06:29,680
years ago. They concluded that each tournament entry has separate

98
00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:34,720
conditions and you cannot aggregate one player's results. Albey are

99
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:41,160
fighting this for casinos, not players, but the problem is

100
00:06:41,199 --> 00:06:45,240
for both dfs and sports betting. Wagering on today's slate

101
00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:48,120
of baseball games has nothing to do with wagering on

102
00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:54,319
football games. In November or even today or WNBA games.

103
00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:58,000
I suspect that both the IRS and courts will rule

104
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:03,040
that nothing in sports betting and dfs except directly related

105
00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:07,560
wagers can be aggregated. Having said that that's in the future,

106
00:07:08,600 --> 00:07:13,399
likely some date beyond twenty thirty, that means I think

107
00:07:13,439 --> 00:07:17,519
it may underscore the word. May be possible to lump

108
00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:23,000
of days bets into one session, especially with online betting

109
00:07:23,079 --> 00:07:26,680
for an act of better somebody who's betting every day.

110
00:07:26,839 --> 00:07:30,399
It makes some sense, but well, the courts uphold it.

111
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:32,160
Nobody knows.

112
00:07:32,600 --> 00:07:38,360
Speaker 1: Can we skip back your last question on my video poker?

113
00:07:38,399 --> 00:07:42,360
You posed I had twenty thousand in w twogs with

114
00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:48,879
a three thousand dollars win, and then you said that

115
00:07:48,959 --> 00:07:51,920
means I had seventeen thousand in losses. Does that mean,

116
00:07:51,959 --> 00:07:54,759
according to IRS, I had twenty thousand in wins because

117
00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:56,319
that's what my wtwog's were.

118
00:07:57,199 --> 00:08:01,120
Speaker 3: No, the session method is allowed. Courts allow it. The

119
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,720
IRIS Chief Council came out with a opinion that says

120
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:07,800
it should be allowed. So in this situation, what you

121
00:08:07,839 --> 00:08:11,759
would note is twenty thousand of gambling winnings. If you're

122
00:08:11,759 --> 00:08:13,959
a gambler on other income.

123
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:18,600
Speaker 1: And it's only twenty thousand because that's what the wtwogs.

124
00:08:18,079 --> 00:08:21,120
Speaker 3: Are, right, We're just matching the W twogs here because

125
00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:24,120
the IRIS matches. Then if you put down three thousand,

126
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,240
you're going to get an IRS notice. We don't like

127
00:08:26,319 --> 00:08:32,759
IRIS notices. Then below there's a place for adjustments. It's

128
00:08:32,879 --> 00:08:37,120
lining eight Z as in Zebra on schedule one. You know,

129
00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:41,440
put minus seventeen thousand gambling losses in the same session.

130
00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:48,159
And I would advise an amateur gambler to also attached

131
00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:51,159
for eighty two seventy five, which is a disclosure statement

132
00:08:51,759 --> 00:08:55,080
noting what's going on if that ever got the quarter,

133
00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:58,639
and assuming good records, that gambler is going to win

134
00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:04,080
because it the courts allow it, the IRS allows. Key

135
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:07,200
is you need good records. It's essential.

136
00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:14,200
Speaker 1: Okay, Now let's go to a two slot players advantage

137
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:20,519
slot players. These players, let's say they stay in one

138
00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:26,000
casino for the day. They may play on thirty to

139
00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:30,480
one hundred different machines. They walk around until they find

140
00:09:30,519 --> 00:09:34,200
a machine in a what they consider a positive state,

141
00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:38,120
and they play it somewhere between one and ten thousand

142
00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:42,240
hands has a result. Now they go to another machine

143
00:09:42,279 --> 00:09:45,519
looking for a game in a positive state, et cetera.

144
00:09:46,559 --> 00:09:51,639
Is each physical machine accession and does each physical one

145
00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:55,519
need to be recorded separately? This is a huge burden

146
00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:57,559
on somebody who played one hundred machines a day.

147
00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:04,320
Speaker 3: No, it can be one together with some caveatsphere. But

148
00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,840
the way the courts have looked at it is by

149
00:10:07,919 --> 00:10:11,480
walking to the casino and I start the day with

150
00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:16,320
say ten thousand dollars, and I play various machines, and

151
00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:19,080
I leave the casino with twelve thousand dollars, I have

152
00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:23,120
a two thousand dollars win. That's how it's described in

153
00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:27,080
Park V Commissioner, and that would be applicable to an

154
00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:32,399
advantage player playing multiple machines in the same casino and

155
00:10:32,639 --> 00:10:35,559
in the same session. If you can't, like, go on

156
00:10:35,639 --> 00:10:38,240
the casino at ten in the morning, leave it noon,

157
00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:41,840
go back at four in the afternoon, and leave at six,

158
00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:44,679
that would be two different sessions.

159
00:10:44,399 --> 00:10:46,879
Speaker 2: And that would include table games as well. So if

160
00:10:46,879 --> 00:10:50,919
that same slot player occasionally jumps over and jumps into

161
00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:55,519
a hot blackjack shoe, he's working at that casino all

162
00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:58,440
day long without leaving the casino.

163
00:10:59,519 --> 00:11:03,360
Speaker 3: That is probably not able to be combined because it's

164
00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:07,519
a different game the way it's written, the way the

165
00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:11,919
description of a session is game you're playing. If you're

166
00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:16,240
playing video blackjack, which of course is never going to

167
00:11:16,279 --> 00:11:18,759
be advantage, but who knows.

168
00:11:19,399 --> 00:11:22,080
Speaker 1: Don't count on that. Yeah, maybe there's.

169
00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:26,080
Speaker 3: Some sort of weird promotion or something, but assuming you

170
00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:31,240
know true odds, video blackjack wouldn't be most machines that

171
00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,000
could be combined. But a table game, by definition is separate.

172
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:39,559
It's like a poker player playing a poker tournament, busting

173
00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:43,000
the poker tournament and then playing some cash games. That

174
00:11:43,039 --> 00:11:44,399
would be two different sessions.

175
00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:50,519
Speaker 1: Okay. In the slot example, you just said you entered

176
00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:53,000
the casino with ten thousand, you lead with twelve thousand.

177
00:11:53,080 --> 00:11:56,559
That's a two thousand dollars win. What if you had

178
00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,200
five thousand W twogs in that same session?

179
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:04,440
Speaker 3: You always have to note your W two gs always, okay,

180
00:12:04,759 --> 00:12:08,039
if you have a session lag. The way we tend

181
00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:11,440
to do it, and most tax professionals who specialize in

182
00:12:11,519 --> 00:12:15,279
gambling is we need what is your toll of W

183
00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:18,679
two g's for the year. Let's say it's one hundred thousand.

184
00:12:19,360 --> 00:12:22,600
Then we need your session win total. Let's say it's

185
00:12:22,639 --> 00:12:26,320
eighty thousand, well, we're going to have to. In this case,

186
00:12:26,919 --> 00:12:30,480
we would put down you know, for an amateur gambler

187
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:36,080
W two gs one hundred thousand and then below gambling

188
00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:40,399
losses in the same session minus twenty thousand, same sessions.

189
00:12:40,399 --> 00:12:45,080
Excuse me, for a professional gambler, we generally, you know,

190
00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:49,080
would do the same thing today because this law again

191
00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:52,000
does not go in effect until twenty twenty six. On

192
00:12:52,039 --> 00:12:55,399
a schedule seat, we put down W two g's one

193
00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:59,720
hundred thousand gambling losses twenty thousand. We get to the

194
00:12:59,840 --> 00:13:03,200
right result. Always want to match the irs numbers.

195
00:13:03,799 --> 00:13:07,360
Speaker 2: So I for one, am very optimistic that this law

196
00:13:07,519 --> 00:13:09,200
is going to get amended.

197
00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:11,159
Speaker 3: There's it.

198
00:13:11,399 --> 00:13:17,679
Speaker 2: There are already, you know, people putting up amendments Titus

199
00:13:17,679 --> 00:13:20,679
from Nevada, and the fact that they're talking about it

200
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:27,200
on mainstream news as something that's bad I think. So

201
00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:31,279
I'm optimistic, and I'm wondering what your take is on

202
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:34,879
whether you think this will be overturned.

203
00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:40,360
Speaker 3: It will be overturned if the AGA and Indian gaming

204
00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,759
interests want to expend the political capital, and I don't.

205
00:13:44,919 --> 00:13:48,080
I don't think we know the answer to that yet.

206
00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:52,240
Certain aspects of it. I think they're going to I mean,

207
00:13:52,279 --> 00:13:55,000
first of all, there there's new tax law every year,

208
00:13:55,559 --> 00:13:58,720
So is there going to be another tax law later

209
00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:00,519
this year early next year.

210
00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:01,240
Speaker 1: Absolutely?

211
00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:03,320
Speaker 3: Do I have any idea what's going to be in that?

212
00:14:03,559 --> 00:14:07,039
Of course not. Nobody knows today. There are rumors there's

213
00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:11,080
going to be another reconciliation bill. There's something I wrote

214
00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:16,600
about today that really says, please have a technical bill,

215
00:14:16,879 --> 00:14:21,240
basically a bill to fix things. Those are generally bipartisan.

216
00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:26,559
Whether that happens, nobody knows. These are all likely, but

217
00:14:27,559 --> 00:14:33,480
who notes The problem is Titus's bill is unfortunately not

218
00:14:33,559 --> 00:14:36,919
going to ever go anywhere because she has a D

219
00:14:37,279 --> 00:14:41,600
behind her name. This is going to take Republicans. I

220
00:14:41,759 --> 00:14:44,759
you know, I urge everyone who does not like this bill,

221
00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:47,519
which I suspect is about as close to one hundred

222
00:14:47,519 --> 00:14:51,080
percent of your audience as possible if they have a

223
00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:57,159
Republican Congressman or Republican senator, to very respectively, be nice,

224
00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:03,200
write them, email them, and let them know your displeasure

225
00:15:03,279 --> 00:15:06,720
about this portion of the bill. It's a one point

226
00:15:06,879 --> 00:15:11,879
one billion dollar revenue raiser over ten years. There's a

227
00:15:11,879 --> 00:15:15,120
line I love from Lake Paul Volker, who is a

228
00:15:15,159 --> 00:15:19,399
commissioner in the head of the Federal Reserve. Whatever you tax,

229
00:15:19,480 --> 00:15:22,519
you get less of. I am convinced this will not

230
00:15:22,679 --> 00:15:28,279
bring in a billion dollars Yeah over ten years, Harriet,

231
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:34,000
Yeah yeah. And it is horrible sports bet It's horrible

232
00:15:34,039 --> 00:15:38,080
for sports betting. It's horrible for the states, it's horrible

233
00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:42,600
for the Nevada casino industry. It's just ad. But there's

234
00:15:42,639 --> 00:15:46,559
plenty of bad laws on our books.

235
00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:49,279
Speaker 2: And something people really need to be aware of, and

236
00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:54,240
that is, even if they do come up with an amendment,

237
00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:59,679
say next year, that doesn't necessarily mean that it goes

238
00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:05,879
into effect for twenty twenty six. So you're really gambling

239
00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:09,679
if you decide to gamble in twenty twenty six on

240
00:16:09,799 --> 00:16:12,960
the idea that, oh, they're going to fix this, because

241
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,720
it may not take effect until twenty twenty seven. Even

242
00:16:15,759 --> 00:16:18,679
if they do get it through, well, we may have

243
00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:21,159
an idea by the end of the year too. One

244
00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:25,080
of the issues right now is my guess is AGA

245
00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:29,080
is going to survey their members about this, and Indian

246
00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:33,399
casinos also. This bill passed only a couple of weeks ago,

247
00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:37,200
was signed into law on July fourth. We're recording this

248
00:16:37,279 --> 00:16:44,639
on July fifteenth. That's not enough time. We The rumors

249
00:16:44,679 --> 00:16:49,519
are there's going to be another reconciliation bill later this year,

250
00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:56,240
probably in like the September October time frame. If we

251
00:16:56,639 --> 00:17:00,240
that is probably where we will see something. If we're

252
00:17:00,279 --> 00:17:01,679
going to see something this year.

253
00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:08,359
Speaker 1: Okay, ten ninety ninths sometimes casinos issue ten ninety nine

254
00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:12,680
for various wins. Are these affected by the new law?

255
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:17,799
Speaker 3: Yes, beginning in twenty twenty six, the ten ninety nine

256
00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:23,039
threshold was increased to two thousand dollars for most ten

257
00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:26,039
ninety nines, including gambling related ten ninety.

258
00:17:25,839 --> 00:17:31,599
Speaker 2: Nine right, So people, So people need to realize that

259
00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:34,880
ten ninety nine is not a W two G. Those

260
00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:39,039
are two different things. And the ten ninety nine threshold

261
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:44,119
went up, not the W two G. But there's also

262
00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:50,200
that threshold on ten ninety nine is only for the

263
00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:52,519
withholding right, not for the.

264
00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:57,680
Speaker 3: No. The ten ninety nine threshold if for example, you

265
00:17:57,720 --> 00:18:00,319
win a casino contest, that's where you get a a

266
00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:05,599
ten ninety nine. That threshold was increased to two thousand

267
00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:10,279
dollars period and its index for inflation. So beginning in

268
00:18:10,319 --> 00:18:12,799
twenty twenty seven, it will go up from two thousand

269
00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:18,839
to something. Assuming we have some inflation, the W two

270
00:18:18,839 --> 00:18:25,720
G backup with holding threshold was increased to two thousand dollars. However,

271
00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:31,839
the W two G issuance threshold was not increased. Therefore,

272
00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:35,759
if you have a slot win, you pull the handle

273
00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:39,319
so to speak, on a slot machine video poker, and

274
00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:44,279
you hit a thirteen hundred dollar jackpot, you will have

275
00:18:44,319 --> 00:18:47,680
a W two GD issue. If you refuse to give

276
00:18:47,720 --> 00:18:52,599
your social, which is not a great idea, you will

277
00:18:52,799 --> 00:18:56,640
not have back up withholding because it didn't reach the

278
00:18:56,640 --> 00:19:00,480
two thousand dollars threshold. That's how I read the plane

279
00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:05,079
language of the law and the plane language governs. Again,

280
00:19:05,119 --> 00:19:10,319
a technical corrections bill could be in the future to

281
00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:13,359
increase both the two thousand dollars. That would be welcome,

282
00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:19,519
because that twelve hundred dollars slot threshold was I want

283
00:19:19,559 --> 00:19:22,759
to say, it dates to the nineteen seventies or even earlier,

284
00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:25,240
way before my time.

285
00:19:26,079 --> 00:19:29,079
Speaker 2: Yeah, and this idea that you can refuse to give

286
00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:35,839
your social and they'll take withholding out. You know, most

287
00:19:35,839 --> 00:19:39,160
casinos they don't know the law at all and they

288
00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:43,079
will just refuse to pay you, you know. So, yeah,

289
00:19:43,160 --> 00:19:45,279
that's not a good idea to try to tell them no,

290
00:19:45,359 --> 00:19:48,039
I'm not giving you my social on a w twog

291
00:19:48,279 --> 00:19:51,119
unless you're willing to just walk away from the jackpot entirely.

292
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:54,200
Speaker 1: You also walk away from any credit you have on

293
00:19:54,240 --> 00:19:58,000
the machine before the jackpot hit right, right right.

294
00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:01,880
Speaker 3: The idea that these two threshold are different make no sense,

295
00:20:02,079 --> 00:20:05,000
And as I think, I mentioned a technical corrections bill

296
00:20:05,559 --> 00:20:10,359
for things like this normally happens, but our Congress is

297
00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:11,359
pretty polarized.

298
00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:15,599
Speaker 1: Ctrs usually issued when you have more than ten thousand

299
00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:18,920
in cash transaction in a day. Are they affected at

300
00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:19,559
all by the.

301
00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:24,039
Speaker 3: No ctrs are part of the Bank Secrecy Act? Nothing

302
00:20:24,079 --> 00:20:27,680
in this law changed, Well, there's a couple things that

303
00:20:27,759 --> 00:20:33,160
the word changed, but nothing regarding ctrs. Also, it's not

304
00:20:33,240 --> 00:20:36,200
has nothing to do with wins and losses. They're just

305
00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:39,799
movement of money in and out. So you could have

306
00:20:39,839 --> 00:20:43,279
a losing session and have a CTR it issued if

307
00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:48,119
you know, turning in more than ten thousand dollars okay.

308
00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:52,000
Speaker 1: In nineteen eighty seven, there was a Commissioner versus Grutzinger,

309
00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:56,319
a Supreme Court decision that established gambling income could be

310
00:20:56,400 --> 00:21:00,240
considered a trade or business and thus losses are considered

311
00:21:00,319 --> 00:21:06,000
an expense against revenue. This new law changes that.

312
00:21:07,039 --> 00:21:12,960
Speaker 3: No with all expenses are always allowed for anyone in business,

313
00:21:13,599 --> 00:21:17,319
all ordinary and necessary expenses are allowed up to the

314
00:21:18,960 --> 00:21:23,519
are allowed now for gamblers. What has changed is that

315
00:21:23,960 --> 00:21:29,400
expenses are limited to ninety percent of actual expenses. So

316
00:21:29,519 --> 00:21:35,400
if your expenses total ten thousand dollars ordinary necessary, and

317
00:21:35,599 --> 00:21:38,559
this is after any other limitations. For example, you only

318
00:21:38,559 --> 00:21:41,720
get fifty cents on the dollar for meals, you would

319
00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:46,480
get nine thousand dollars of tax expenses. But your combined

320
00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:51,359
losses and expenses together still can't go higher than ninety

321
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:52,559
percent of your wins.

322
00:21:52,640 --> 00:21:53,039
Speaker 1: Correct.

323
00:21:53,759 --> 00:21:57,119
Speaker 3: It has nothing to do with wins. It has to

324
00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:02,599
do with actual losses. So suppose we have a professional

325
00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:06,480
gambler has one hundred thousand of gambling wins, one hundred

326
00:22:06,559 --> 00:22:10,640
thousand of gambling losses, and business expenses. He will report

327
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:14,119
one hundred thousand of wins and ninety thousand of losses

328
00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:17,759
and business expenses. Let's take another professional gambler who has

329
00:22:17,759 --> 00:22:21,559
one hundred thousand of wins and twenty thousand of losses

330
00:22:21,559 --> 00:22:25,319
and business expenses. They'll report one hundred thousand of wins

331
00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:30,839
and eighteen thousand of losses and business expenses. Let's say

332
00:22:30,880 --> 00:22:35,200
we have a another professional gambler who has one hundred

333
00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:39,480
thousand of wins and one hundred and ten thousand of

334
00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:44,720
losses and business expenses. He will lose eleven thousand dollars

335
00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:48,559
of losses and business expenses because they're limited to ninety

336
00:22:48,599 --> 00:22:51,799
percent of actual they're also limited by the way to

337
00:22:51,839 --> 00:22:54,759
the amount of wins, but in this case they'll end

338
00:22:54,799 --> 00:22:58,400
up at ninety nine thousand dollars and he will pay

339
00:22:58,480 --> 00:23:01,319
tax on one thousand dollars. Is a phantom income.

340
00:23:02,000 --> 00:23:06,279
Speaker 1: We've talked about relatively small amounts of W twogs. Big

341
00:23:06,319 --> 00:23:09,240
players can easily get five or ten million dollars a

342
00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:11,440
W two g's, or have in the past. I've done

343
00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:13,799
that many times when they've played in high limit rooms.

344
00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:19,480
This law seems to be the death of high limit rooms.

345
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:23,000
Players might do it one year and again and figure

346
00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:25,799
out they have this horrendous tax bill. They had no

347
00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:30,519
idea that it was happening, and then you just can't

348
00:23:30,519 --> 00:23:32,880
play that way anymore. You can't play twenty five dollars

349
00:23:32,920 --> 00:23:36,160
machines and get all of the W twogs or one

350
00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:38,480
hundred dollars slot machines. You just get tons of W

351
00:23:38,559 --> 00:23:42,960
two g's and people have to stop playing those Is

352
00:23:42,960 --> 00:23:45,799
that fair? Mostly it is fair.

353
00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:53,079
Speaker 3: The issue again is not w two g it's session results. Now,

354
00:23:53,519 --> 00:23:56,519
first I'm going to point out the obvious. Most amateur

355
00:23:56,559 --> 00:23:59,920
gamblers don't keep session monks, and so they're gonna be

356
00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:03,480
Why I'm cited by this, it's you know, somebody who

357
00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:07,279
goes in again, A losing gambler is not impact so

358
00:24:07,319 --> 00:24:10,799
to a certain extent. Mean, if we think about it,

359
00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:14,079
the high high limit rooms, I would guess, just like

360
00:24:14,160 --> 00:24:16,559
any other form of gambling, at least ninety percent of

361
00:24:16,559 --> 00:24:20,559
the people walking in there lose big and therefore those

362
00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:24,200
people are not going to be impact. You still get,

363
00:24:24,519 --> 00:24:27,759
you know, ninety percent of your gambling losses, and if

364
00:24:27,799 --> 00:24:30,559
those gambling losses exceed one hundred and eleven percent of

365
00:24:30,559 --> 00:24:36,480
your wins, nothing has changed. But as far as professional

366
00:24:36,519 --> 00:24:39,680
gamblers playing high limit rooms, absolutely it's going to have

367
00:24:39,759 --> 00:24:45,079
an impact. Anything that has large dollars low margin is

368
00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:46,359
hit under this spill.

369
00:24:47,279 --> 00:24:51,480
Speaker 2: Yeah, and sports betters are even more impacted than video

370
00:24:51,519 --> 00:24:56,039
poker players. It's easy to have twenty fifty million dollars

371
00:24:56,079 --> 00:25:00,960
worth of turnover in the course of a year, and

372
00:25:01,759 --> 00:25:06,839
you know, if if your return on investment is you know,

373
00:25:06,960 --> 00:25:11,000
two or three percent. You know, you can end up

374
00:25:11,039 --> 00:25:13,799
owing millions of dollars in taxes on.

375
00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:16,319
Speaker 3: You know, not that much income.

376
00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:17,759
Speaker 1: I agree.

377
00:25:17,799 --> 00:25:21,880
Speaker 3: I think sports betting especially is really going to be hit.

378
00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:25,839
Another key question, which again we don't know the answer

379
00:25:25,839 --> 00:25:30,519
to yet, is how will these sports betting companies here

380
00:25:30,559 --> 00:25:34,519
I'm considering companies that really only do sports bank DraftKings,

381
00:25:34,559 --> 00:25:38,480
FanDuel look at this bill. They do not want professional

382
00:25:38,480 --> 00:25:42,799
sports banks. They have limited people right and left. If

383
00:25:42,839 --> 00:25:46,160
they discover that Russ Fox is a professional sports better

384
00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:50,119
and uses draft Gings or FanDuel, I will be limited

385
00:25:50,160 --> 00:25:54,279
to basically two cent bets. But what are they going

386
00:25:54,359 --> 00:25:58,160
to do because it still hurts their volume, it hurts

387
00:25:58,200 --> 00:26:02,680
the amount they're going to collect, and we don't Again,

388
00:26:02,799 --> 00:26:05,480
the law is too new for us to know the answer.

389
00:26:06,079 --> 00:26:10,880
I suspect they're probably very neutral on this bill because

390
00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,880
they do want to get rid of professionals professional sports betters,

391
00:26:15,559 --> 00:26:18,599
but they don't like the idea of what's going to

392
00:26:18,599 --> 00:26:22,920
potentially happen long term. That's a guess. I have no

393
00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:26,079
you know, I've not spoken to anyone at either company.

394
00:26:26,440 --> 00:26:29,440
I have no idea how they feel I've not seen

395
00:26:29,480 --> 00:26:33,400
any public statements from them, but I assume sooner or

396
00:26:33,480 --> 00:26:35,279
later they're going to be forced to make one.

397
00:26:35,519 --> 00:26:38,480
Speaker 2: Well, I think they're a little short sighted in that

398
00:26:39,000 --> 00:26:43,319
those are publicly traded companies, which means if suddenly their

399
00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:48,200
handle goes down, they have to justify that to their

400
00:26:48,920 --> 00:26:52,480
to their shareholders and to say, oh, well, we only

401
00:26:52,519 --> 00:26:56,000
got rid of the bad money that was coming in.

402
00:26:56,119 --> 00:26:58,240
I don't know that shareholders are going to buy that.

403
00:26:58,799 --> 00:27:01,880
I also think they're very afraid that it's going to

404
00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:07,400
drive more and more people off shore. And even the

405
00:27:07,519 --> 00:27:12,559
recreational gamblers are going to start hearing even though the

406
00:27:12,599 --> 00:27:16,880
tax thing doesn't affect them, but they're going to hear

407
00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:20,880
that their taxes are going to be worse, and you know,

408
00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:25,319
and and take their action off shore. But I mean,

409
00:27:25,359 --> 00:27:27,720
as you say, we don't know what's going to happen there.

410
00:27:27,759 --> 00:27:33,359
And the sports books are much more concerned with getting

411
00:27:33,440 --> 00:27:37,200
Eye casino. They make so much more on the internet

412
00:27:37,240 --> 00:27:40,920
casino gaming than they do on the sports betting, So

413
00:27:41,720 --> 00:27:44,920
if they think there's something in their calculation that might

414
00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:49,359
affect Eye Casino, then you know that that may have

415
00:27:49,480 --> 00:27:53,599
something to do with which way they try to push

416
00:27:53,720 --> 00:27:56,000
it's just frankly too orly enough.

417
00:27:56,839 --> 00:28:00,920
Speaker 1: Yeah. Is there any distinction between US citizens and non

418
00:28:01,079 --> 00:28:02,640
US citizens.

419
00:28:03,519 --> 00:28:10,799
Speaker 3: With respect to this bill? Yes, there is. Non US

420
00:28:10,839 --> 00:28:15,319
citizens who are permanent residents are taxed just like US citizens.

421
00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:20,400
Those individuals are in the same exact boat as you

422
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:26,000
and I. However, non resident aliens are generally not taxed

423
00:28:26,039 --> 00:28:29,160
as US citizens unless they meet what is called the

424
00:28:29,160 --> 00:28:35,720
substantial presence test, and also so a non resident alien

425
00:28:35,799 --> 00:28:42,720
is not impacted general. Finally, only non resident alien professional

426
00:28:42,759 --> 00:28:47,720
gamblers conducting a business in the US, those individuals, of

427
00:28:47,759 --> 00:28:52,480
which there might be two in the entire trait, are impacted.

428
00:28:52,920 --> 00:28:56,880
But in general, a non resident like someone who came

429
00:28:56,920 --> 00:28:59,519
to the World Series of Poker, playing at the World

430
00:28:59,519 --> 00:29:02,759
Series Poker, then going home, he or she will not

431
00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:04,160
be impacted.

432
00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:06,839
Speaker 2: So he doesn't owe tax on the money he earns

433
00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:11,279
at the World Series, assuming he's in a country with

434
00:29:11,319 --> 00:29:12,519
a tax treaty.

435
00:29:13,200 --> 00:29:15,680
Speaker 3: If he's in it, like he's from the United Kingdom,

436
00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:20,240
comes here for two months, plays, goes home. The UK

437
00:29:20,480 --> 00:29:24,359
US tax treaty says there's no withholding on gambling. He

438
00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:28,880
gets all of his money, no impact gambling wins and losses,

439
00:29:29,440 --> 00:29:35,880
don't affect him not impacted. Under the US Code, which

440
00:29:35,920 --> 00:29:38,799
is law, and the US UK tax treaty and treaties

441
00:29:38,799 --> 00:29:43,039
are considered law. An individual from a tax treaty country

442
00:29:43,079 --> 00:29:48,920
faces no withholding. There's a list of them. They're mostly

443
00:29:49,079 --> 00:29:53,480
in Western Europe, but it's not all countries. If you're

444
00:29:53,519 --> 00:29:57,359
from the wrong country, for example Switzerland, you have thirty

445
00:29:57,400 --> 00:30:01,119
percent withholding on anything that generates s a W two G.

446
00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:06,279
Those individuals get a Form ten forty two S. Now, consider,

447
00:30:06,319 --> 00:30:10,839
for example, somebody from a tax cheaty country who earns

448
00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:15,039
a W two G poker, slots, video poker, whatever it is.

449
00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:17,799
They still get a tax for them. They get a

450
00:30:17,839 --> 00:30:21,119
Form ten forty two S, but it will show zero

451
00:30:21,200 --> 00:30:25,359
percent withholding, assuming they have what is called an IT

452
00:30:25,559 --> 00:30:31,319
in an individual tax pay identification number. Some casinos in

453
00:30:31,359 --> 00:30:35,079
the US issue them, some don't. If you go to

454
00:30:35,119 --> 00:30:37,319
the wrong casino and you don't have an IT in,

455
00:30:37,759 --> 00:30:40,440
you will still have money with hell, but you can

456
00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:41,160
get it back.

457
00:30:41,960 --> 00:30:45,000
Speaker 2: So what about I know that if you are an

458
00:30:45,039 --> 00:30:49,759
American and you move to another country, say Canada or

459
00:30:49,799 --> 00:30:53,599
the UK, you still owe tax on the money you

460
00:30:53,720 --> 00:30:57,920
earn in the United States. Or if you're not living

461
00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:00,720
there a certain like I don't know, eleven months of

462
00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:03,200
the year or something. There's some amount of time you're

463
00:31:03,240 --> 00:31:06,799
allowed to visit. But how hard is it to actually

464
00:31:06,880 --> 00:31:11,079
renounce your citizenship and become a citizen of Canada or

465
00:31:11,279 --> 00:31:15,119
UK and not have the tax situation.

466
00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:18,240
Speaker 3: Well, there are a couple. There are actually two things

467
00:31:18,279 --> 00:31:22,839
in your question. First, and a US citizen owes tax

468
00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:27,240
on the worldwide income. A US citizen living in Canada

469
00:31:27,319 --> 00:31:31,799
or the UK has to report everything. Now, some things

470
00:31:31,839 --> 00:31:36,720
can be excluded via something called the foreign earned income exclusion.

471
00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:41,799
They are also foreign tax credits. Generally, a US citizen

472
00:31:41,880 --> 00:31:46,960
living abroad earning an income from wages will not owe

473
00:31:47,160 --> 00:31:51,079
US tax if they're in a high tax country, which

474
00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:56,119
definitely Canada is, UK is as far as wages. If

475
00:31:56,119 --> 00:31:59,039
they're in a low tax country, they may owe some tax.

476
00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:03,359
There are some countries, for example, I always get this wrong,

477
00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:06,960
the Baltic countries Lafya, Lithuania, Estonia. One of them has

478
00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:10,799
I get ten or twelve percent income tax rate, while

479
00:32:10,839 --> 00:32:14,119
an American working in one of those countries is going

480
00:32:14,160 --> 00:32:16,960
to owe US tax because the US tax rate will

481
00:32:17,000 --> 00:32:24,039
generally be higher. Renouncing citizenship is a legal process. It's involved.

482
00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:28,319
It is something that somebody, if anyone wanted to do that,

483
00:32:28,359 --> 00:32:32,960
they needed to consult an attorney. Not an attorney. There

484
00:32:33,039 --> 00:32:36,720
is a form you file if you renounce citizenship because

485
00:32:36,720 --> 00:32:40,880
the US has an exit tax. If your assets are

486
00:32:40,920 --> 00:32:43,000
over a certain amount or your income is over a

487
00:32:43,039 --> 00:32:47,400
certain amount, you generally have to continue filing tax returns

488
00:32:47,400 --> 00:32:50,839
for ten years, and you may owe US tax for

489
00:32:51,039 --> 00:32:56,400
additional ten years. If your income isn't that high or

490
00:32:56,440 --> 00:32:59,480
your assets are not that high, you file the form.

491
00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:02,319
By the way, this form has filed under penalty of perjury.

492
00:33:03,279 --> 00:33:06,160
Somebody got in very deep trouble for claiming he was

493
00:33:06,200 --> 00:33:09,720
worth about half a million dollars when he was worth

494
00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:14,440
sixteen billion. That doesn't work, well, don't I do not?

495
00:33:15,200 --> 00:33:21,799
It was around herror, Yeah. Uh. He ended up paying

496
00:33:21,839 --> 00:33:24,799
the exit attacks along with penalties and interest in lieu

497
00:33:24,839 --> 00:33:28,039
of jail tie he had made a flight from a

498
00:33:28,039 --> 00:33:30,799
country which didn't have an extradition treaty with the US

499
00:33:30,920 --> 00:33:31,640
to one that did.

500
00:33:32,279 --> 00:33:33,079
Speaker 1: Oops.

501
00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:38,039
Speaker 3: But I have filed this form twice for clients. As

502
00:33:38,039 --> 00:33:41,319
long as you do it, and you're you know, doing it,

503
00:33:41,400 --> 00:33:45,400
you know accurately, it's and in both cases, both clients

504
00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:48,880
were what are called accidental Americans. They were born in

505
00:33:48,920 --> 00:33:53,000
the US, they had citizenship in another country. They were

506
00:33:53,039 --> 00:33:57,559
both average individuals, you know, middle class earning wages. You know,

507
00:33:57,640 --> 00:34:00,359
they didn't have billions in assets, and they didn't make

508
00:34:00,440 --> 00:34:04,480
you know, tremendous dollar amounts of income where they would

509
00:34:04,519 --> 00:34:08,320
be subject to the exit tax. Anybody who is subject

510
00:34:08,400 --> 00:34:11,440
to the exit tax, you know, I would immediately refer

511
00:34:11,519 --> 00:34:12,840
to an immigration attorney.

512
00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:18,519
Speaker 1: Are there any company structures such as sole proprietorships, partnerships, llc,

513
00:34:18,679 --> 00:34:22,880
et cetera, that would receive more favorable treatment under the

514
00:34:22,920 --> 00:34:28,159
new law prepared to another company structure.

515
00:34:28,639 --> 00:34:34,079
Speaker 3: Not related to gambling, however, for certain other business activities. Potentially, yes,

516
00:34:35,039 --> 00:34:38,880
I expect a slight increase in sea corporations in the future.

517
00:34:39,679 --> 00:34:42,880
Has nothing to do with gambling. But my initial reading

518
00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:48,440
was there are some tax advantages potentially for sea corporations

519
00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:50,119
in the future.

520
00:34:51,039 --> 00:34:54,800
Speaker 1: Early in this administration, maybe still, there was a Department

521
00:34:54,800 --> 00:34:59,079
of Government Efficiency which went around and, among other things,

522
00:34:59,119 --> 00:35:03,800
fired a lot of federal employees. Presumably this includes a

523
00:35:03,800 --> 00:35:08,360
lot of IRS auditors. Does this imply the chances of

524
00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:11,719
having your taxes audited for your twenty twenty six return

525
00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:16,119
are lower than they would be for your twenty twenty

526
00:35:16,119 --> 00:35:16,760
four return.

527
00:35:17,719 --> 00:35:21,480
Speaker 3: Well, I would say one thing to first say is

528
00:35:21,599 --> 00:35:26,719
audits don't happen when you file your return. Let's assume

529
00:35:26,800 --> 00:35:30,960
you file today on extension your twenty twenty four return

530
00:35:31,880 --> 00:35:35,840
that returns file today is in middle of July. An

531
00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:40,639
audit would happen between the middle of twenty twenty six

532
00:35:41,159 --> 00:35:46,280
to the middle of twenty twenty seven. Audits happen aways

533
00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:50,559
out from the date you file your tax return, So

534
00:35:51,039 --> 00:35:53,800
we don't know what's going to happen for twenty twenty

535
00:35:53,840 --> 00:35:57,039
six returns because that's we're dealing with stuff that would

536
00:35:57,039 --> 00:36:00,679
happen in twenty seven to twenty eight, and nobody knows

537
00:36:00,679 --> 00:36:04,840
what the IRIS workforce is going to be then. But generally, yes,

538
00:36:05,000 --> 00:36:08,480
I expect audits to go down because there are just

539
00:36:08,599 --> 00:36:11,320
fewer people the IRS. The IRIS is lost in various

540
00:36:11,360 --> 00:36:15,599
departments between ten and thirty percent of their staff. Now,

541
00:36:15,920 --> 00:36:20,079
that is going to also be not good for tax administration,

542
00:36:21,599 --> 00:36:25,039
and there needs to be some adds. It helps with

543
00:36:25,159 --> 00:36:27,679
tax compliance. I hate to say that, but you know,

544
00:36:27,679 --> 00:36:29,960
it'd be nice if everybody told the truth on their

545
00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:34,679
tax returns. But I'm not naive. There was something that

546
00:36:34,760 --> 00:36:38,840
came out this morning where an individual who's a former

547
00:36:39,800 --> 00:36:43,480
person very high up in the IRIS expects another ten

548
00:36:43,519 --> 00:36:48,280
to forty percent of IRIS employees to leave this year. Wow,

549
00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:54,039
that's a lot. Now, the IRIS computer system is ancient.

550
00:36:54,679 --> 00:36:59,119
It dates to nineteen fifty nine. You've heard me correctly,

551
00:36:59,760 --> 00:37:03,199
before I was born, and you know I'm going to

552
00:37:03,239 --> 00:37:05,920
be aligible for Social Security in a few years. So

553
00:37:06,199 --> 00:37:10,360
it's old. Think punch carts. By the way, if anybody

554
00:37:10,440 --> 00:37:13,480
listening is a COBOYL programmer and wants a job, the

555
00:37:13,519 --> 00:37:16,519
IRIS will hire you right now. You have to go

556
00:37:16,519 --> 00:37:20,440
to Martinsburg, West Virginia. Don't I have no idea where

557
00:37:20,480 --> 00:37:23,239
that is, except it's in West Virginia. But that's where

558
00:37:23,239 --> 00:37:28,239
the main IRIS computing center is. However, one of the

559
00:37:28,280 --> 00:37:31,880
things that happens the IRS sends out a lot of

560
00:37:31,960 --> 00:37:35,800
automated under reporting unit notices. These are where the IRIS

561
00:37:35,880 --> 00:37:39,440
match things up. For example, you have one thousand dollars

562
00:37:39,440 --> 00:37:41,440
of interest income from a bank and you don't put

563
00:37:41,480 --> 00:37:43,679
it on your tax return. The IRIS is very good

564
00:37:43,679 --> 00:37:46,480
about matching those things, and you get an automated under

565
00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:49,280
reporting unit notice saying you don't think you included this.

566
00:37:49,960 --> 00:37:52,760
Sometimes you have and the IRIS computer just doesn't see it.

567
00:37:53,719 --> 00:37:56,360
You type Bank of America and you accidentally made a

568
00:37:56,400 --> 00:37:59,199
type up and so the computer didn't match it. You

569
00:37:59,280 --> 00:38:03,599
just pointed out out. I expect a lot more of

570
00:38:03,639 --> 00:38:06,960
these notices in the future. The IRS is going to

571
00:38:07,039 --> 00:38:10,400
see a lot of w twogs. People are going to

572
00:38:10,599 --> 00:38:14,679
use a session method not attached disclosure statements, and the

573
00:38:14,719 --> 00:38:17,079
IRS is going to be sending out a lot of

574
00:38:17,119 --> 00:38:19,920
these notices, and there's going to be fewer staff to

575
00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:23,800
deal with the responses. That's going to be an issue.

576
00:38:24,320 --> 00:38:28,559
Speaker 2: I mean, isn't somebody take a recreational gambler that gambles

577
00:38:28,559 --> 00:38:33,599
a lot, you know, aren't they reporting that wrong? If

578
00:38:33,719 --> 00:38:37,960
let's say that they had fifty thousand in w twogs

579
00:38:38,079 --> 00:38:41,079
and they lost a total of seventy thousand or whatever,

580
00:38:41,719 --> 00:38:44,440
And what you're saying is you put fifty thousand in

581
00:38:44,519 --> 00:38:49,519
the winds and seventy thousand and go offset it with

582
00:38:49,840 --> 00:38:52,159
the losses ninety percent of seventy thousand.

583
00:38:53,119 --> 00:38:57,199
Speaker 4: But aren't they actually because those people some days won,

584
00:38:58,199 --> 00:39:00,840
so they actually had more than fIF fifty thousand in

585
00:39:00,920 --> 00:39:03,360
wins than just the w twogs.

586
00:39:03,920 --> 00:39:05,920
Speaker 3: So shouldn't they be putting.

587
00:39:05,840 --> 00:39:08,760
Speaker 2: I had eighty thousand in win and one hundred and

588
00:39:08,840 --> 00:39:09,880
twenty thousand.

589
00:39:09,679 --> 00:39:13,840
Speaker 3: Lossy, it's possible they have more. It's also possible they

590
00:39:13,840 --> 00:39:17,960
have less. Okay, your w twogs do not mean that's

591
00:39:18,000 --> 00:39:21,000
your session total of wings. No, but on some days

592
00:39:21,039 --> 00:39:21,599
people win.

593
00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:24,280
Speaker 2: I mean, if they're a spot player, they you know.

594
00:39:24,239 --> 00:39:27,679
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely. But here's the thing. If they have fifty

595
00:39:27,719 --> 00:39:29,920
thousand of W two g's, what's the total of their

596
00:39:30,000 --> 00:39:33,360
session wins. If it's more than fifty thousand, yes, they

597
00:39:33,400 --> 00:39:37,199
need to add to their wins another twenty thousand. Okay,

598
00:39:37,519 --> 00:39:40,840
if it's less, they can subtract that as an adjustment

599
00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:44,639
to income. It'll be both ways. There are people who

600
00:39:44,679 --> 00:39:47,559
have fifty thousand of w twog's one hundred and fifty

601
00:39:47,639 --> 00:39:50,440
thousand of gambling wings, and there are also people with

602
00:39:50,519 --> 00:39:54,239
fifty thousand of w twogs with five thousand of gambling wins.

603
00:39:54,480 --> 00:39:59,440
Both are possible. Yeah, in many cases people will just okay,

604
00:39:59,480 --> 00:40:02,679
I have fifty thousand of gambling of w twogs, I

605
00:40:02,760 --> 00:40:05,960
lost money. I lost more than one hundred and eleven percent,

606
00:40:06,280 --> 00:40:08,920
So I'm just going to put down fifty thousand of

607
00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:13,239
tax gambling losses. I'm going to be fine. Is that

608
00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:18,960
technically correct? No? Is it accurate or change the tax?

609
00:40:19,239 --> 00:40:22,599
Probably not, but it could in some circumstance changes their

610
00:40:22,599 --> 00:40:25,880
adjusted gross income? Right, yes, but it may or may

611
00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:28,239
not change their tax. It all depends.

612
00:40:28,840 --> 00:40:34,360
Speaker 1: I would guess this law is going to increase the

613
00:40:34,599 --> 00:40:40,679
dishonest reporting among a large number of professional gamblers. Now,

614
00:40:40,800 --> 00:40:44,719
obviously dishonest reporting is something you're very much against. But

615
00:40:44,920 --> 00:40:48,480
would you suspect that I'm right in this? Yes?

616
00:40:49,239 --> 00:40:54,159
Speaker 3: I'm not naive. People are I mean, a gambler who

617
00:40:54,199 --> 00:40:57,880
loses is and they're going to a lot of people

618
00:40:58,039 --> 00:41:02,800
are going to play auditor went. I can never advise

619
00:41:02,880 --> 00:41:09,519
such actions. I'm licensed, and I always have to suggest

620
00:41:09,559 --> 00:41:12,840
compliance with our tax laws. But I'm not naive.

621
00:41:13,760 --> 00:41:16,679
Speaker 1: So Russell Fox, thank you very much. If any of

622
00:41:16,679 --> 00:41:18,920
our listeners wish to get a hold of you for

623
00:41:19,559 --> 00:41:22,079
tax or other consulting reasons, how would they do that?

624
00:41:22,880 --> 00:41:27,559
Speaker 3: Eisi way is to send an email to rcfoxat Claytontax

625
00:41:27,719 --> 00:41:29,119
dot com.

626
00:41:30,599 --> 00:41:31,920
Speaker 1: Be advised that.

627
00:41:32,239 --> 00:41:35,280
Speaker 3: If you're interested in us preparing your twenty twenty four

628
00:41:35,440 --> 00:41:39,639
tax return, that would be on extension, probably not doable.

629
00:41:40,119 --> 00:41:44,679
We're close to at capacity for this calendar year, but

630
00:41:44,840 --> 00:41:47,960
for next year would probably be still doable. That's twenty

631
00:41:48,079 --> 00:41:51,679
twenty five returns a year. We're in filed in twenty six.

632
00:41:52,440 --> 00:41:53,280
Speaker 1: Thank you for much.

633
00:41:53,679 --> 00:41:56,559
Speaker 2: We'll put a link for your link to your website

634
00:41:56,559 --> 00:41:59,000
into your email in the show notes.

635
00:42:00,280 --> 00:42:04,559
Speaker 1: Is it also true, Russell Fox, that if this tax

636
00:42:04,639 --> 00:42:08,800
law changes in that you'll likely report that in your

637
00:42:08,800 --> 00:42:11,360
website taxable talk dot com.

638
00:42:11,760 --> 00:42:16,360
Speaker 3: Oh yes, if there is a if, for example, something

639
00:42:17,119 --> 00:42:21,599
the law gets changed, I will absolutely report it. I'm

640
00:42:21,679 --> 00:42:25,800
still digesting all the provisions of this bill. The bill

641
00:42:25,880 --> 00:42:30,599
itself is I have it up. It is three hundred

642
00:42:30,599 --> 00:42:33,800
and thirty pages of fine print. I thought it was

643
00:42:33,840 --> 00:42:37,920
over nine hundred pages. It is showing at well, it's

644
00:42:37,960 --> 00:42:42,079
frunk it in the format it's probably nine hundred pages

645
00:42:42,480 --> 00:42:46,239
at about an eleven font as printed by the US

646
00:42:46,360 --> 00:42:50,599
Government Publishing Office. It's in like a four or five font.

647
00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:54,960
Speaker 1: Oh geez, I mean it's tiny, all righty, Thank you

648
00:42:55,039 --> 00:42:58,800
very much, Russell Fox. Thank you, Richard. Go out and

649
00:42:58,880 --> 00:43:01,159
hit lots of wild flushes, everybody, but do it this

650
00:43:01,280 --> 00:43:04,039
year and not next. Thank you. Goodbye,

