Speaker 1: Oh red fess are, Hello, and welcome to the show.
Speaker 2: This is the Cult of Conspiracy and my name is Jonathan,
Speaker 2: I'm Jacob and there we go.
Speaker 3: Sorry, Raven, I'll get ready to introduce you, but a
Speaker 3: lot fuck it.
Speaker 2: You're a co host on this show right now anyway,
Speaker 2: So what are we getting into today, guys?
Speaker 3: There's a lot of As we were talking about the
Speaker 3: plandemic right from COVID and all the things that we
Speaker 3: watched the CDC, do we watch the who absolutely fumbled
Speaker 3: the football? Now we have Fauci getting retroactively pardoned for
Speaker 3: crimes that allegedly right now aren't even crimes, but we
Speaker 3: all know that really happened. There was criminal negligence and
Speaker 3: malpracticed and all the things. We have a lot of
Speaker 3: things around the corner that are supposed to be hitting
Speaker 3: us in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 4: We have like eleven suspected diseases that are potentially all
Speaker 4: plandemics that are going to happen. They've been in the
Speaker 4: works for a couple of years. Some of them have
Speaker 4: been around for longer than that, so they are gearing
Speaker 4: up to potentially do more pandemics and lock people in.
Speaker 5: So absolutely so it's going to be getting a little
Speaker 5: crazy here.
Speaker 2: I mean, there has been a lot of talk about
Speaker 2: this disease X for the past few years. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, I believe that it was even brought
Speaker 2: up before COVID was was even a thing. It was
Speaker 2: like speculated for like quite a while, right, And I think,
Speaker 2: correct me if I'm wrong.
Speaker 3: Weren't they weren't they thinking that the that the COVID
Speaker 3: virus was going to be disease x or am.
Speaker 5: I getting in shure the term?
Speaker 4: Yeah, So the term disease X is actually about it's
Speaker 4: about not knowing what it is and we're like where
Speaker 4: it originates from or exactly what it is. So they
Speaker 4: current they termed they coined the term, excuse me, disease x,
Speaker 4: and they use that for any disease that they aren't
Speaker 4: one hundred percent certain what it actually is. They did
Speaker 4: call COVID disease X for a while. The new disease
Speaker 4: X that that's been around is actually severe malaria, And
Speaker 4: they just finally, as of like a few days ago,
Speaker 4: decided to make that like the the disease X thing.
Speaker 4: So now they're not going to use that terminology anymore
Speaker 4: because now it's severe malaria in the Congo.
Speaker 3: But honestly, it's not even just is ease x that
Speaker 3: we need to be aware of, because there is you
Speaker 3: know what, there's a lot going on and this episode
Speaker 3: is not even gonna cover all of it. We're gonna
Speaker 3: cover the Biggins, right, We're gonna cover the ones that
Speaker 3: there is absolutely articles out about, uh, scientific studies that
Speaker 3: are being done on it. There is new stuff coming
Speaker 3: out every week, it seems, so, you know what, We're
Speaker 3: gonna go ahead and uh, we're gonna play a little
Speaker 3: video at this time. We're gonna share the screen if
Speaker 3: for anybody listening to this episode rather than just listening,
Speaker 3: or excuse me, anybody listening to this episode rather than
Speaker 3: watching it, you may want to find the way to
Speaker 3: watch it because this is going to be a lot
Speaker 3: of images, a lot of uh fine, the sources are
Speaker 3: gonna be shown on this one. So Jonathan, for anybody
Speaker 3: who would like to see it rather than hear it,
Speaker 3: tell them where they can go. Well, obviously you'll be.
Speaker 2: Able to come check us out at Patreon dot com
Speaker 2: slash Cultive Conspiracy Podcast or rockfin dot com slash cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy. Both of those links are down to the
Speaker 2: show notes below. It is the best way to be
Speaker 2: able to support the show, and as a result of
Speaker 2: your gratitude towards us, you will have completely commercial free
Speaker 2: shows along with all video content. You'll be able to
Speaker 2: see our guest faces are our faces obviously a lot
Speaker 2: of the articles and all the videos, and you'll be
Speaker 2: able to get the shows a couple of days in advance.
Speaker 2: And if you sign up for the Third Eye All
Speaker 2: the Way Open tier, you will have access to join
Speaker 2: us every Tuesday night Live at nine pm Central to
Speaker 2: go on just a Cult of Conspiracy spree. So if
Speaker 2: that is something that interests you, then that would be
Speaker 2: the best way to be able to support the show,
Speaker 2: and we appreciate all the good Cult members who already
Speaker 2: have done so.
Speaker 3: Indeed. All right, so we're gonna play a little video
Speaker 3: off of Instagram right now. This British guy, he is
Speaker 3: a bit of a liberal, I get that, but this
Speaker 3: particular video doesn't really have a lot of political leanings,
Speaker 3: and it does come with a lot of information in
Speaker 3: a very condensed form. And then we are going to
Speaker 3: break down all of the claims that are being made
Speaker 3: and show that there's a little more to this than
Speaker 3: just some some laughs to be had, you know what
Speaker 3: I mean. Okay, let's check it out.
Speaker 6: Update dissex here the currently nameless potential next pandemic or
Speaker 6: did Elon Musk name you. I've killed over one hundred
Speaker 6: and fifty people in the Congo, and nobody knows exactly
Speaker 6: what I am, so the first one. Well though, they
Speaker 6: do think I might be severe malaria. Put severe in
Speaker 6: front of anything, and I'm happy. Hi, I'm new world
Speaker 6: screwwork any different to old world screw work. They found
Speaker 6: me in cattle coming from Mexico to the US, and
Speaker 6: I eat warm blooded animals from the inside out, including humans.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, then you can stay Avian flu here, don't
Speaker 6: need your government named bird flu of course. The state
Speaker 6: of emergency in California, and the first severe case of
Speaker 6: ME has been found in a human in Louisiana. It's
Speaker 6: great work. And there's that word severe again, empox here.
Speaker 6: Severe cases of ME in the US and the UK
Speaker 6: all severe severe, severe severe. There's almost sixty thousand cases
Speaker 6: of ME globally this year. Great work, cholera. But how
Speaker 6: when you're so preventable, you see, well, there's a more
Speaker 6: severe version or severe version, of course, dengey here Buenos
Speaker 6: dia A. See, I was only spreading in South America,
Speaker 6: but now I'm global upon your good targ and howdy then,
Speaker 6: and I'm mirror bacteria. Is this a time for reflection? Stupid?
Speaker 6: They're calling for scientists to hold the creation of me
Speaker 6: as long story, short eye could destroy all life on Earth.
Speaker 6: And are scientists going to hold the creation of this
Speaker 6: potentially life destroying bacteria They're humans?
Speaker 3: No, So there you go, And yes, the mirror bacteria
Speaker 3: is one that we are going to spend a solid
Speaker 3: amount of time talking about here. But let's go over
Speaker 3: the other ones. You know, he kind of went over
Speaker 3: a lot there right off the rip, Jonathan, what are
Speaker 3: your thoughts which things really jumped out at you? Is
Speaker 3: there any in particular that jumped out where yet?
Speaker 2: Well, as far as the malaria one that you guys
Speaker 2: had mentioned earlier and then was also mentioned in this one.
Speaker 2: It's just so interesting that it was only a couple
Speaker 2: of years ago that we actually just covered this about
Speaker 2: how Bill Gates is trying to fund these flying syringes
Speaker 2: that will basically be created to carry the malaria vaccine
Speaker 2: inside of these fucking disgrace of God's green earth mosquitos, right, Like,
Speaker 2: who actually benefits from a mosquito?
Speaker 3: Is this? Like you know what I mean? Like, what
Speaker 3: is the actual reason for mosquitos in the first place?
Speaker 3: Is it just like lizard food? Is it frog food?
Speaker 3: Is that really what it is? It's like, so I'm
Speaker 3: glad you said the names that you did. So everybody,
Speaker 3: real quick, all the good cal members listening, put a
Speaker 3: big pin in Bill Gates and put a big old
Speaker 3: pin in mosquitoes as a whole, because as we go
Speaker 3: down this list, you're gonna notice a weird common thread
Speaker 3: that just happens to come up in every fucking example.
Speaker 2: So and how about like, you know, those are both
Speaker 2: of the amphibian and reptile name too, So it's not
Speaker 2: too far from old Billy Gates himself.
Speaker 3: No doubt, no doubt. Okay, So I'm gonna go ahead
Speaker 3: and share the screen here in just a second, and uh,
Speaker 3: let's get after it. Let's talk about something. Uh let's
Speaker 3: just start at the top here, Okay. So, Pandemic twenty
Speaker 3: twenty five fears as eleven diseases docs most worried about released,
Speaker 3: including disease X and COVID two point zero. This is
Speaker 3: from mirrorus dot com. So yeah, let's go ahead, and uh,
Speaker 3: let's just work down the list here, shall we. All right?
Speaker 3: Uh to read now, all right, you know what, I'll
Speaker 3: actually do a little bit of reading today. I'm feeling
Speaker 3: it and I'm close enough to my screen because I'm
Speaker 3: sharing these two mics and so I have to like
Speaker 3: sit up close so I could do this. Okay, here
Speaker 3: we go. This article was released December twenty ninth of
Speaker 3: last year. It is only a few days old, and
Speaker 3: let's get into it. The ominously named disease X could
Speaker 3: potentially trigger the next major pandemic, a medical expert has cautioned,
Speaker 3: while also expressing concern that the world is ill prepared
Speaker 3: for a sudden surge in cases. Disease X is essentially
Speaker 3: a placeholder name for an unidentified infection. It was listed
Speaker 3: among eleven other perilous diseases that have doctors on high
Speaker 3: alert for the upcoming year. Measles, cholera, scavy this, bird flu,
Speaker 3: and even another COVID outbreak were also included in the
Speaker 3: Scientific Communities list of most dreaded infections for twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3: Now that would be I believe the co founder of
Speaker 3: Google Brain Andrew. I don't even know how to pronounce ng.
Speaker 3: Is that supposed to be win?
Speaker 5: Maybe it's just gen and the end silent. I will
Speaker 5: say as far as.
Speaker 2: The dude, scabies, Oh my god, let me tell you
Speaker 2: a little story about scabies. So you've had it, dude,
Speaker 2: Oh my god. Yes, And it was the worst thing
Speaker 2: that's ever happened to me, Like it was. It's worse
Speaker 2: than chicken pox, like it is, because it's literally tiny
Speaker 2: little bugs that get into your skin and they start
Speaker 2: crawling around and it makes you so itchy, and it
Speaker 2: gives you a rash almost entirely all over your body.
Speaker 2: And how it happened was I'm not gonna call out
Speaker 2: any names or anything like that here, but my sister
Speaker 2: was really My sister used to be really.
Speaker 3: Good for I'm not gonna call out any names.
Speaker 2: My sister though, bro, No, no, no, no, My sister isn't the problem.
Speaker 3: But my sister used to be really good friends with
Speaker 3: this one chick.
Speaker 2: And this is when they were still in high school
Speaker 2: whenever all this was going down, So they were young,
Speaker 2: you know, And so she used to be friends with
Speaker 2: this one girl and this girl happened to be running
Speaker 2: away from her house all the time, and she was
Speaker 2: constantly sleeping in different houses every single night, and everybody
Speaker 2: was kicking her out and they didn't really want to
Speaker 2: like take on that girl, right, And so what my
Speaker 2: sister did, and even my parents, they were like, look,
Speaker 2: she can spend a couple of nights here, but we're
Speaker 2: not taking her in to be like, she's not going
Speaker 2: to be like a family member or something like that, right,
Speaker 2: And so she stayed a little bit longer than she
Speaker 2: was supposed to. My sister kept on like sneaking her
Speaker 2: in through the through the window at night, and you know,
Speaker 2: just being nice, like my sister's kind hearted like that,
Speaker 2: being a homie. Long story short, we all end up
Speaker 2: getting scabies because this poor girl has slept on so
Speaker 2: many couches in so many different houses, infected the entire
Speaker 2: house with scabies.
Speaker 3: Dude. Is the one of the worst things I've ever experienced.
Speaker 3: It sucked, dude, all right. So I had a guy
Speaker 3: served with as a matter of fact, and for a
Speaker 3: while he was being a dirty bitch about it. All right,
Speaker 3: I'm just gonna be honest, and no, I don't mean
Speaker 3: dirty in the sense of sleeping with anything that moved,
Speaker 3: although some of that too, But Washington, d C. Has
Speaker 3: a pretty nasty homeless population, like for real, and I
Speaker 3: don't know how he was in constant contact with this
Speaker 3: group of people that lived under bridges and shit. But
Speaker 3: essentially he and his girlfriend both contracted scabies. And apparently
Speaker 3: he had slept under a bridge a couple of nights
Speaker 3: when he had a barracks room. But keep that in mind,
Speaker 3: he had a room that he could have slept in,
Speaker 3: he chose to sleep under some bridges and then he
Speaker 3: gets scabies and that was a whole thing. So I
Speaker 3: watched him deal with it, and that was actually really
Speaker 3: fucking funny. But you know it's it's because he was,
Speaker 3: you know, being dirty, and we laughed at him.
Speaker 5: It is horrible.
Speaker 2: So yes, if there is a severe as he was
Speaker 2: alluding to everything severe, but if there's a severe case
Speaker 2: of fucking scabies, oh man, let me just say, like,
Speaker 2: you're in for a you're in for a treat.
Speaker 3: I'll be honest with you. Though most of our list
Speaker 3: today doesn't have scabies on it. It was mentioned in
Speaker 3: this article, and I think it gets mentioned a couple
Speaker 3: more times, but it's like it's a tertiary almost.
Speaker 4: It's one of it's one of so many already, Like
Speaker 4: I mean, we aren't even hitting on the top three
Speaker 4: today of malaria, HIV, and tuberculosis. Those are the top
Speaker 4: three right now that are killing everybody. But these are
Speaker 4: the ones that are coming up or have been in
Speaker 4: the last like a few years, and now they're like
Speaker 4: gaining enough traction and enough notre enough people are noticing
Speaker 4: it that now they're you know, on the watch list,
Speaker 4: and they're becoming a potential issue.
Speaker 3: Yes, indeed, all right, so we're gonna keep reading here.
Speaker 3: It says the World Health Organization have previously classified unknown
Speaker 3: pathogens as disease X. It's including it in its priority
Speaker 3: list of diseases requiring urgent research. Most recently, it claimed
Speaker 3: at least thirty one lives, predominantly children in the Panzaei
Speaker 3: region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Now, okay,
Speaker 3: that's why it's kind of like malaria, but on steroids.
Speaker 3: It's coming up in certain areas where malaria would be
Speaker 3: expected to take hold. Unknown flulight. Oh that's another article.
Speaker 3: Excuse me. This is one of the pictures of a
Speaker 3: mosquito that can spread dingay fever and chu kung going yea.
Speaker 3: I don't know how to pronounce that work weird one,
Speaker 3: but it's a thing. So between October twenty fourth and
Speaker 3: December fifth, the World Health Organization reported over four hundred
Speaker 3: instances of an unidentified disease in the DRC Democratic Republic
Speaker 3: of the Congo. Common symptoms included fever, headache, body aches,
Speaker 3: and severe cough. However, the most critical cases were often
Speaker 3: associated with extreme malnutrition. Shocker, I know. According to doctor
Speaker 3: Michael Head, Senior Research Fellow at the Global Health at
Speaker 3: the University of Southampton, disease X is one of the
Speaker 3: infections most likely to result in serious outbreaks, possibly even
Speaker 3: escalating it to a pandemic. If such an outbreak were
Speaker 3: to occur suddenly, the world would likely be caught off guard,
Speaker 3: much like the global shock caused by the coronavirus. I mean,
Speaker 3: you know, because the world was super not ready for
Speaker 3: the sniffles that happened and allegedly claim so many lives
Speaker 3: that really and truly it wasn't COVID related. But whatever,
Speaker 3: they're gearing up.
Speaker 4: Though they're gearing up, they've made them more deadly like
Speaker 4: that was the problem with SARS. SARS is where the
Speaker 4: COVID originated from. When they tested the vaccines on people
Speaker 4: and they were testing stuff, they realized that it was
Speaker 4: too infectious too fast. It's like the game pandemic. You
Speaker 4: want to make sure that you are able to spread it,
Speaker 4: but you don't want to kill people off too fast.
Speaker 4: You need them to be sick long enough to be
Speaker 4: able to infect more people. But it needs to like
Speaker 4: there's a whole process to it. So just like with COVID,
Speaker 4: it was not as severe. So then they're like, oh,
Speaker 4: wait a minute, let's add some other shit into this
Speaker 4: and then we'll see because most of them that we're
Speaker 4: going to read on the list now, the severe cases
Speaker 4: all mimic a type of COVID. Well, it's really like
Speaker 4: there's symptoms mimic respiratory thing like malaria. Now the severe
Speaker 4: which is disease X mimics COVID because it's all respiratory.
Speaker 4: Add it in with the malaria stuff as.
Speaker 3: Well, so it's not just mosquitoes are spreading it from
Speaker 3: point A to point B. People coughing is now as coughing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so they had to add that. It's like I
Speaker 4: wouldn't say they, but if you were to want to
Speaker 4: make a disease more deadly, you have like to be
Speaker 4: able to spread it. Coughing is like one of the
Speaker 4: number one ways to be able to spread it from
Speaker 4: person to person.
Speaker 3: Well to all of our good cult members.
Speaker 2: This this is not anything new to us, these kinds
Speaker 2: of diseases that are made in a lab for gain
Speaker 2: of function research and then you know it's it's used
Speaker 2: as a I mean, it's it's a biological like war
Speaker 2: weapon at this point where they are trying to basically
Speaker 2: reduce the population, right and you know, we've always talked
Speaker 2: about the Georgia Guidestones about how they wanted to bring
Speaker 2: the world's population down down to under five hundred million
Speaker 2: in order to be able to have a better way
Speaker 2: of corralling and caressing the human mind and spirits under
Speaker 2: the fear of the of the government thumb. So you know,
Speaker 2: with that being said, there was a lot of things
Speaker 2: that were kind of found out about whenever COVID was
Speaker 2: going on about how to get rid of certain infectious
Speaker 2: diseases and how to prevent this kind of shit from happening.
Speaker 2: And it was actually just recently mentioned on the Joe
Speaker 2: Rogan podcast with fucking mel Gibson.
Speaker 3: When you watched that one, Doug, I watched parts of.
Speaker 2: It, Yeah, yeah, But mel Gibson was basically like, Yo,
Speaker 2: I had I have all these friends that had like
Speaker 2: stage four cancer and they were all like on death's door,
Speaker 2: getting ready to die. And he goes, you know how
Speaker 2: you know what they were all taking and how they're
Speaker 2: all one hundred percent like healthy. He goes, what they
Speaker 2: were taking was was ivermectin and fenn bendazol, And those
Speaker 2: are the two things that are getting rid of it
Speaker 2: because cancer and a lot of these other things are
Speaker 2: parasitic in nature, right, And the same thing goes with
Speaker 2: I think a lot of this respiratory shit to where
Speaker 2: you can get rid of it with just basic ivermectin
Speaker 2: and and fenn bendazol, which they don't want you to
Speaker 2: know about, because this is shit has been around for
Speaker 2: a long time, and it has been working for a
Speaker 2: very long time, and it wasn't primarily only used on
Speaker 2: farm animals, like it works so good on humans that
Speaker 2: they that they then used it on horses and other
Speaker 2: farm animals. So it's a safe it's a safe thing
Speaker 2: that is very cheap to.
Speaker 3: Make, and therefore, you know, the the big pharma is
Speaker 3: not going to be able to make a shitload of
Speaker 3: money off of it.
Speaker 4: Exactly, just don't inject it. I know people that injected it,
Speaker 4: like did the correct amounts and stuff, but apparently it's
Speaker 4: like absolutely like leg on fire, like the worst pain
Speaker 4: you've ever felt. So they ended up taking it like
Speaker 4: a different way.
Speaker 3: Wait, why would they inject it? You can eat it.
Speaker 3: It tastes like sour apple. Look, I don't know, Okay,
Speaker 3: I just probably there's probably of it, but.
Speaker 4: There's different versions. But like, yeah, they had the injectable
Speaker 4: kind and I was like, oh, you really got to
Speaker 4: know like your actual you know, how much to take
Speaker 4: and stuff. But it was apparently like the most excruciating pain,
Speaker 4: and I was like, but didn't work. They I will say,
Speaker 4: they had like an entire parasitic cleanse and like they
Speaker 4: actually ended up seeing parasites that were removed from their bodies.
Speaker 3: So I mean, look, it's only dumb if it doesn't work, right, true,
Speaker 3: I just would I would.
Speaker 2: I would prefer the paste as well. It really doesn't
Speaker 2: taste bad. It's more of a gel I feel like
Speaker 2: than a paste. I don't know why they called it
Speaker 2: bat but but it's it doesn't taste bad, it takes
Speaker 2: It's just like apple. So if you like apple flavored shit,
Speaker 2: then it's just going to be like a little treat
Speaker 2: every morning, no doubt.
Speaker 3: All Right, So look, I'm only going to read a
Speaker 3: little bit more of this article because this article was
Speaker 3: written in December of last year, so it's not as
Speaker 3: up to date. But I did want to show the
Speaker 3: comparison here, So we're gonna read where it talks about
Speaker 3: disease X and then the next article goes more in
Speaker 3: depth of what's going on in the CONGO, and I
Speaker 3: want to compare and contrast was what new information has
Speaker 3: changed in only a week's time. You see what I'm saying,
Speaker 3: So good cult members. The information is being updated daily,
Speaker 3: if not weekly. New information is constantly coming out. And
Speaker 3: again you got to test the source because we really
Speaker 3: don't know the validity of every single article written. And
Speaker 3: then we have some that we're going to pull up
Speaker 3: from the CDC and from the WHO, and again we
Speaker 3: must in fact take that with a massive, massive mountain
Speaker 3: of salt. But if that is in fact the official
Speaker 3: narrative going out you know, we got to talk about it.
Speaker 3: So all right, here we go. Use X isn't exactly
Speaker 3: a specific illness. Think of it more like a placeholder
Speaker 3: for in any yet undiscovered sickness. Despite not being pinpointed,
Speaker 3: the threat of some mysterious virus of or bacterial menace
Speaker 3: is quite concrete and bofens okay, have been nudging governments
Speaker 3: to gear up for a curveball from mother Nature. Disease
Speaker 3: X is the name given. Uh. It literally just repeated itself, Okay,
Speaker 3: So it's basically saying like disease X is kind of unknown. Uh,
Speaker 3: but it's just that placeholder. Now. This is from CBS News.
Speaker 3: Congo says mystery disease behind dozens of deaths and women
Speaker 3: and children finally identified as severe malaria. This is coming
Speaker 3: out of Johannesburg. As a matter of fact, for weeks
Speaker 3: it was dubbed simply disease X. But the mysterious flu
Speaker 3: like disease that has killed more than one hundred and
Speaker 3: forty three people, mainly women and young children in the DRC,
Speaker 3: has finally been identified. The mystery has been solved. Congo
Speaker 3: Health Ministry declared in a statement on Tuesday, it's a
Speaker 3: case of severe malaria in the form of respiratory illness.
Speaker 3: The Health agency said malnutrition is the in the hard
Speaker 3: hit region had weakened the local population's immunity, leaving them
Speaker 3: more vulnerable to the disease. People who contract malaria's infection
Speaker 3: have exhibited symptoms including headache, fever, cough, and body ache.
Speaker 3: So very similar to if you just you're getting worn down,
Speaker 3: your immune system is dog shit, and you get sick,
Speaker 3: you feel like you're sick. Uh, the congos the uh
Speaker 3: that that word boffin, it's it's uh boffin and it
Speaker 3: means a person engaged in scientific or technical research. You
Speaker 3: feel like they would have put that one as a capital. Then,
Speaker 3: seeing as how that was like an official title, they
Speaker 3: made that seem like it was a it seemed.
Speaker 5: Like that was kind of like arogatory term.
Speaker 2: Well, it seems more like a kind of like another
Speaker 2: word for expert at that point. Right, So it's not
Speaker 2: necessarily a title, is it. I mean, you wouldn't say
Speaker 2: I'm I I like I have a Like a PhD
Speaker 2: is kind of like a title, right, Our doctor is
Speaker 2: like a title.
Speaker 5: But saying somebody is an expert, I don't know if
Speaker 5: that's really a title.
Speaker 3: Okay, I'm learning new things here.
Speaker 7: Man.
Speaker 3: Vocabulary word of the day the boffin or is it boffin?
Speaker 5: Do you see often as I saw how it was
Speaker 5: pronounced often?
Speaker 3: Okay, hey, fucking right. Uh. The Congo's health minister had
Speaker 3: told journalists the country was on quote unquote maximum alert
Speaker 3: over the spread of the previously unidentified disease. The health
Speaker 3: officials told CBS News in early December that the remoteness
Speaker 3: of the epicenter of the outbreak and lack of diagnosis
Speaker 3: made it difficult to launch a concrete response. At least
Speaker 3: five hundred and ninety two cases were reported after the
Speaker 3: alert was first raised by the Congo's Health Ministry on
Speaker 3: October twenty ninth. The ministry said the disease had fatality
Speaker 3: rate of six point two five percent, so in reality,
Speaker 3: you have a little over a six percent chance of
Speaker 3: dying if you were to contract this new disease X
Speaker 3: slash malaria. More than half of the deaths recorded were
Speaker 3: children younger than five who were severely malnourished when they
Speaker 3: contracted the disease, according to the World Health Organization. At
Speaker 3: a press briefing on December tenth who Director General t
Speaker 3: Dro not going to pronounce his name, let's call him
Speaker 3: Big G said ten out of twelve samples from the
Speaker 3: patient suffering from the mysterious diseases had tested positive for malaria,
Speaker 3: but he said they were still testing at the time
Speaker 3: for other diseases. The Congolese government had sent a rapid
Speaker 3: intervention team to Quongo Province, four hundred and thirty five
Speaker 3: miles southeast of the capital of Kinshasa, consisting of epidemiologists
Speaker 3: and other medical experts. Their objective was to identify the
Speaker 3: disease and mount a suitable response. Government officials had earlier
Speaker 3: warned locals to avoid touching the people infected with the
Speaker 3: illness or the bodies of those who had died. Congo
Speaker 3: had suffered from many disease outbreaks in recent years, including typhoid, malaria,
Speaker 3: and anemia. The country had also grappled with impox outbreak,
Speaker 3: with more than forty seven thousand suspected cases and over
Speaker 3: one thousand suspected deaths from that disease. According to the
Speaker 3: World Health Organization.
Speaker 4: Don't worry, it's still around in getting and getting more action.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we're gonna be talking about that here in a
Speaker 3: bit too, the impos because my, oh my, they just
Speaker 3: can't chill with one thing. We got to have twelve.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 3: Anti malaria medicine provided by the World Health Organization was
Speaker 3: being distributed at local health centers in the Congo, and
Speaker 3: World Health Organization officials said more medical supplies were due
Speaker 3: to arrive in the country by Wednesday. It's the rainy
Speaker 3: season in the Congo, which often sees a rise in
Speaker 3: malaria cases and will certainly complicate treating those most at risk.
Speaker 3: And that makes a lot of sense. Right during the
Speaker 3: rainy season is when we would have more stagnant pools
Speaker 3: of water where they're not typically which is where mosquitoes
Speaker 3: really love to lay their eggs and live. And uh yeah,
Speaker 3: because of this, now we have rising cases of disease
Speaker 3: X and now it's making its way across the planet. Yeah,
Speaker 3: this is this is where we're at currently with the
Speaker 3: disease X slash. Let's call it super malaria.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I guess it's more it's more advanced malaria, which
Speaker 4: is interesting because of the you know, they've been promoting
Speaker 4: the malaria vaccines that they created through the Bill Gates Foundations.
Speaker 4: They're supposed to be being able to stop malaria. That
Speaker 4: that was the whole push we had talked you guys
Speaker 4: had me on before. We talked all about the malaria
Speaker 4: and the vaccines and stuff. So for this to continue
Speaker 4: and to now become like a super malaria, it raises
Speaker 4: the question as is it at the same strand if
Speaker 4: these quote vaccines are actually working, is it going to
Speaker 4: be the same strand are they doing the same protocols
Speaker 4: they're using in Africa or are they doing different protocols?
Speaker 4: Like what is it like? Are they actually gonna stop it?
Speaker 4: Are these bugs going to be because that's the problem
Speaker 4: is the mosquitoes are moving, they're ever changing. They know
Speaker 4: it stays diagnant one area. So are they going to
Speaker 4: try to use the bioengineered you know mosquitoes to drop
Speaker 4: into that area like they did in Brazil. You know,
Speaker 4: I'm just curious to see how they're going to how
Speaker 4: they're going to stop this super you know, malaria from
Speaker 4: going everywhere. Wait stop it, well, stop it, stop it,
Speaker 4: like I mean like quotation mark stop it right right right?
Speaker 3: What are your thoughts on this one, Jonathan?
Speaker 2: I mean, the problem with you know, gain of function
Speaker 2: in other countries is that we don't necessarily even know
Speaker 2: what's going on inside of there, you know, like it
Speaker 2: is supposedly allegedly illegal in the United States. I wouldn't
Speaker 2: put it past you know, some of these people to
Speaker 2: allow certain laboratories to be able to, you know, figure
Speaker 2: out certain gain of function techniques in order to create
Speaker 2: some new diseases, right, Like, I wouldn't put it past
Speaker 2: them all the all the wild shit that's already going
Speaker 2: on over here. But either way, let's let's assume that
Speaker 2: there isn't any kind of you know, X labs within
Speaker 2: the United States that are performing or or trying to
Speaker 2: achieve some sort of gain of function disease to leak
Speaker 2: like I don't know. We just don't know. And that's
Speaker 2: why a lot of this is still speculation. But it
Speaker 2: is interesting about like why did Fauci get the preemptive
Speaker 2: like get out of Joe free card, Like why is
Speaker 2: that if he was absolutely you know, free of any
Speaker 2: wrongdoing and also hasn't been charged with anything yet, it
Speaker 2: was preemptively pardoned, which is very interesting because they must
Speaker 2: know that something's coming down the pipeline and if and
Speaker 2: I would imagine they're probably gonna try and lay it
Speaker 2: all on Faucia because they love throwing their own under
Speaker 2: the bus, because if they can make a sacrifice in
Speaker 2: the name of like keeping the you know, the elite
Speaker 2: or the democratic or the new World order, you know,
Speaker 2: title free and clear, they'll throw their own, They'll eat
Speaker 2: their own, and then they can just keep on carrying
Speaker 2: out whatever it is that they're trying to carry out.
Speaker 5: So I don't know, dude, it all just seems so.
Speaker 3: Evil, and the fact that these are all severe versions,
Speaker 3: it's just pointing out that you know, they've worked on it,
Speaker 3: they've made it stronger, they've made it severe. This will
Speaker 3: be their field test, if you will.
Speaker 4: Speaking of Fauci though, like to randomly, and I haven't
Speaker 4: dug more into this, but there's new videos surfacing of
Speaker 4: him that from a couple decades ago pretty much how
Speaker 4: RFK has been shining light on the vaccines and how
Speaker 4: the manufacturers haven't had any like anybody to be able
Speaker 4: to hold them accountable. Fauci was leading different man different vaccine.
Speaker 4: I guess they were changing the vaccines that he was
Speaker 4: leading that and pushing those vaccines that are now being
Speaker 4: linked to harming children and our DNA and stuff like that.
Speaker 4: And so there's like a quick video I saw touching
Speaker 4: on that and they were like, oh, you know, finally
Speaker 4: somebody's going to hold him accountable for his crimes against humanity.
Speaker 4: So I'm curious. I haven't really dug more into it,
Speaker 4: but I'm curious to see it's you know, there's so
Speaker 4: many people that have been a part of this, you know,
Speaker 4: harming people's DNA and causing all these issues. I don't
Speaker 4: think anyone's going to be held accountable. I think they're
Speaker 4: just going to be like, oh, well, best person did it,
Speaker 4: and that's just what happens.
Speaker 3: Well, and that's it.
Speaker 2: You might be asking yourself like, why would they even
Speaker 2: ever do anything like this, Why would they be researching
Speaker 2: some kind of disease or drug or something like that
Speaker 2: in order to, you know, in order to possibly use
Speaker 2: as a bioweapon to make everybody sick and kill off
Speaker 2: a lot of people. It's not strictly I know, we
Speaker 2: talk a lot about the world health organizations and the
Speaker 2: big pharma and stuff like that, and how they're all
Speaker 2: making a lot of money.
Speaker 5: I don't believe that that's the only reason.
Speaker 3: I do believe that these people are sick in the
Speaker 3: head dude, like they get off to I mean, dare
Speaker 3: I say human sacrifice, because that's really what it is,
Speaker 3: Like they are sacrificing a lot of people. If you
Speaker 3: think about it, If you're creating some kind of disease
Speaker 3: that's going to kill thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands,
Speaker 3: even millions of people, that's not in the name of
Speaker 3: big Pharma, you know what I'm saying, Like that is
Speaker 3: more a double Now, that's got to be some kind
Speaker 3: of devilish reason, right. I wouldn't say it's in the
Speaker 3: name of big Pharma. I will say it is to
Speaker 3: the financial betterment of big Pharma. You see what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: And that's and I'm not even saying that they are.
Speaker 3: The goal isn't to reduce the world's population and actually
Speaker 3: cause human death. I'm with you one hundred percent. But
Speaker 3: they have got to find a way to make as
Speaker 3: much money as they can't off of this because money
Speaker 3: equals power. That's just how this plays out. So with
Speaker 3: all of that being said, let's dive into the next one. Jonathan,
Speaker 3: have you ever heard of New World Screw? Because I'm
Speaker 3: gonna be honest, I hadn't before I started doing this research.
Speaker 5: Uh, I feel like there's a joke to be made
Speaker 5: with this one.
Speaker 4: No, isn't there ironic that it's new World, right, the
Speaker 4: new World screw worm, meaning that it comes from this hemisphere,
Speaker 4: from North or South America.
Speaker 3: That's all the new world thing means. And that's why
Speaker 3: even the British boy made his joke about how like, oh, bhen,
Speaker 3: it's dias He's like, why used to be in South America?
Speaker 3: Now I'm global? So all right, let's dig into this here.
Speaker 3: So New World screw worm. This is from the USDA
Speaker 3: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Because up until recently,
Speaker 3: this was primarily an animal type of parasite. It was
Speaker 3: nothing that humans really needed to worry about. It was
Speaker 3: kind of like, uh, well, I mean, yes it could
Speaker 3: affect humans, but it's kind of like rabies almost like
Speaker 3: it's predominantly animals. Could humans catch it? Yes, it's not good,
Speaker 3: but it's not like humans were scared of the rabies epidemic,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying. But this is kind of
Speaker 3: taking a weird shift. So this first article is going
Speaker 3: to be talking mostly about the animal side of it,
Speaker 3: and then the next one's gonna be talking about what's
Speaker 3: happening with human beings, so New World screwworm. This is
Speaker 3: from December of last year as well. New World screwworm.
Speaker 3: The technical word for it is coke Leyemaya Hominovulas sure
Speaker 3: is a devastating pest. When NWS fly larva maggots burrow
Speaker 3: into the flesh of a living animal, they cause serious,
Speaker 3: often deadly damage to the animal. The NWS can invest
Speaker 3: or excuse me, can infest livestock, pets, wildlife, occasionally birds,
Speaker 3: and in rare cases people. This is endemic in Cuba, Haiti,
Speaker 3: the Dominican Republic, and countries in South America, with cases
Speaker 3: spreading north to Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, and now Mexico.
Speaker 3: Although USDA eradicated INWS from the United States in nineteen
Speaker 3: sixty six using sterile insect technique. Using sterile insect technique,
Speaker 3: there is a constant risk of reintroduction into the United States.
Speaker 3: To prevent the northward movement of this pest from South Amyericamerica,
Speaker 3: two NWS free areas in Central and North America, APHIS
Speaker 3: collaborated with Panama to maintain a barrier zone in the
Speaker 3: in Eastern Panama. The cornerstone of this collaboration is the
Speaker 3: Panama United States Commission for the Eradication and Prevention of
Speaker 3: Screwworms aka COPEG. Through COPEG the the jokes right themselves, child,
Speaker 3: I get it. Through COPEG, we release sterile male screwworm
Speaker 3: flies into in the Darian province of Eastern Panama to
Speaker 3: create a biological barrier. So now we get back into
Speaker 3: the genetically modified insects that they are releasing to the
Speaker 3: public as a quote unquote preventative. Right, somehow we have Again,
Speaker 3: we just talked about this. Remember I said the lovebug
Speaker 3: was designed in a lab, and it's like, wait, are
Speaker 3: they able to really change insects like this?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 3: Yes they are, because almost every single one of the
Speaker 3: viruses that we are going to be talking about today
Speaker 3: comes from, if not trying to be prevented from genetically
Speaker 3: modified in This is insane, dude. So okay, this is
Speaker 3: just the quick little article kind of the background to
Speaker 3: what the New World screwworm was. Now let's talk about
Speaker 3: what New World screw worm currently is. Flesh eating Excuse me,
Speaker 3: this article is from Live Science or Live Science. I'm
Speaker 3: not sure which way. They pronounce it, but bear with me.
Speaker 3: U go ahead. No flesh eating human parasite sweeping across
Speaker 3: Central America is raising concerns in the US what to know.
Speaker 3: New World screwworm, like we said earlier, was largely eradicated
Speaker 3: in the United States in nineteen sixties and eighties, respectively,
Speaker 3: but the potentially fatal parasite is starting to make a
Speaker 3: comeback in the United States. This is a more close
Speaker 3: up picture of the larva in question.
Speaker 5: Here, ugly little fucking cutie right.
Speaker 3: A flesh eating parasite that burrows into its host skin
Speaker 3: through open wounds, is making a comeback in Central America.
Speaker 3: It primarily affects cattle and other livestock, but is also
Speaker 3: known to infect hu umans. The worm can cause New
Speaker 3: World screworm myelyasis and potentially fatal condition with no known
Speaker 3: treatment in humans. I'm gonna say that part again. It
Speaker 3: can cause I'm not going to say the word mylaus mylasis,
Speaker 3: miass sure, but it is a potentially fatal condition with
Speaker 3: no known treatment in humans. So basically, if you're a
Speaker 3: human and you get this, you're hoping for the best here,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying, Uh, for decades, countries across
Speaker 3: to the Americas have invested billions of dollars to control
Speaker 3: the flesh eating parasite, which is native to South America
Speaker 3: and the Caribbean, but since twenty twenty three, screw worm
Speaker 3: cases have been increased and spreading north. Between the nineteen
Speaker 3: thirties and nineteen fifties, it was a major problem for
Speaker 3: livestock farmers in the southern United States, with producers losing
Speaker 3: up to one hundred million dollars every year due to infestations,
Speaker 3: according to the United States Department of Agriculture. By the
Speaker 3: mid sixties, the parasite was all but eradicated, but thanks
Speaker 3: to sterilization efforts to stop screwworm flies from breeding. Good God,
Speaker 3: this is gonna give me tongue time. A new World
Speaker 3: Screwworm Barrier Zone was set up along the US Mexico
Speaker 3: border in eighty six. The parasite had largely been eradicated
Speaker 3: in Mexico, but it continued to circulate in South America
Speaker 3: and the Caribbean, countries where screw worms are endemic. Now
Speaker 3: a positive detection in Mexico on November twenty second of
Speaker 3: last year, the screwworm may be starting to make its comeback,
Speaker 3: the USDA said in a statement on December sixth. Since
Speaker 3: two thousand and six, the United States and Panama have
Speaker 3: maintained a barrier zone in eastern Panama intended to prevent
Speaker 3: the New World screwworm from moving north from South America
Speaker 3: to these screw worm free areas in Central and North America. However,
Speaker 3: since twenty twenty three, cases have been increasing in number
Speaker 3: and spreading north from Panama to Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala,
Speaker 3: and now Mexico. So here's a deal. It's making its
Speaker 3: way into our livestock. There are already confirmed cases of
Speaker 3: cowls that have it in America.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it said twenty two thousand right here, Yeah, up there,
Speaker 4: Oh right here go bob, right here. It said twenty
Speaker 4: two thousand positive cases as of December fourth.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, So the outbreak, largely among livestock, has been
Speaker 3: particularly stark in Panama, with detections exploding from an average
Speaker 3: twenty five cases per year pre twenty twenty three to
Speaker 3: twenty two thousand, six hundred and eleven positive cases as
Speaker 3: of December fourth, of twenty twenty four. This is this
Speaker 3: is a huge sounds like quite a bit, a little bit.
Speaker 3: We're talking twenty five on average to over twenty two.
Speaker 2: Thousand, which is interesting because they were just talking about
Speaker 2: how big.
Speaker 3: Of a deal.
Speaker 2: What was that that other disease? The was it the
Speaker 2: bird flu that at one hundred and fifty cases.
Speaker 4: Oh, we'll get to that.
Speaker 3: We're going there too, brother, don't you.
Speaker 4: Work, no worries, it's on the docket.
Speaker 3: Costa Rica has also seen an uptick in human cases,
Speaker 3: with one confirmed fatality earlier this year, according to the
Speaker 3: US Embassy in Costa Rica. Okay, so, the parasite spreads
Speaker 3: when adult female screw worms flies lay their eggs in
Speaker 3: the wounds and open orifices of live, warm blooded animals.
Speaker 3: These flies can lay up to three hundred eggs in
Speaker 3: one go, potentially laying thousands during their ten to thirty
Speaker 3: day life span. Even a wound the size of a
Speaker 3: tick bite is enough to attract the female flies to
Speaker 3: lay their eggs. So we're not even talking about some
Speaker 3: wide open gash that's just like open sore. Literally, a
Speaker 3: tick bite is enough of an open place for them
Speaker 3: to come and lay three hundred eggs inside bro This
Speaker 3: is insane. These eggs then hatch into larva, which or larvae,
Speaker 3: which burrow into the wound and feed on the surrounding
Speaker 3: flesh with their sharp, hooked mouths, essentially eating their hosts
Speaker 3: from the inside out. The wound becomes deeper and larger
Speaker 3: as more worm like larva hatch from their eggs, so
Speaker 3: they pretty much just start the process and it just
Speaker 3: goes like that, slowly but surely, eating their way from
Speaker 3: the inside out. These infestations are very painful. They also
Speaker 3: leave their host vulnerable to secondary infections. Of course, Uh, myasis,
Speaker 3: you know what, that's probably the way you pronounce that.
Speaker 3: Myasis refers to generally to infestations of live vertebrate animals
Speaker 3: with fly larva, including screwworms. Mortality rates vary greatly between
Speaker 3: different species, but a large study by the World Health
Speaker 3: Organization found that mortality rates stood at around three percent
Speaker 3: in human cases. Those living in rural areas who frequently
Speaker 3: work with livestock are most vulnerable to infestation, according to
Speaker 3: the CDC, although anyone with open sorees or wounds, including
Speaker 3: from recent surgery, can be affected. There are no approved
Speaker 3: treatment for screwworm infestations other than to physically remove the
Speaker 3: larva from the infected tissue, according to the CDC, instead
Speaker 3: bringing rate here too. As far as that my mia
Speaker 3: assis ass is it measis maya. I don't know how
Speaker 3: to pronounce it. There's too many vowels in that one.
Speaker 2: We're not doctors here, but uh, that term it does
Speaker 2: say I was looking up possible treatment for that, and
Speaker 2: it says the larva can be removed surgically or by
Speaker 2: de bridement and irrigation. The larva will also naturally slough
Speaker 2: off within five to seven weeks, so you can go
Speaker 2: to the natural route and just let it run its
Speaker 2: course for damn near two months, which that doesn't extend.
Speaker 4: Totally fun and hope that you don't die from it.
Speaker 3: But that yeah, they were saying, it's like a fatality
Speaker 3: rate of three percent, So in most people, your immune
Speaker 3: system would be good enough. Keep the area clean, don't
Speaker 3: let it get even further infected, and like they'll die
Speaker 3: off on their own.
Speaker 4: However, oh, could you imagine having live flesh eating like
Speaker 4: burrowed into you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Like, see that's the thing redbugs I hate. And
Speaker 3: they burrow into the skin, they lay their eggs and
Speaker 3: they do the same thing but they only last a
Speaker 3: few weeks or until you like coat the top of
Speaker 3: some clear nail polish and they suffocate. That's pretty much
Speaker 3: the only way to get rid of them. Right. This
Speaker 3: is even worse because they're growing so fast inside that
Speaker 3: you have to have them surgically removed. Like you can't
Speaker 3: surgically remove a red bug, but you can surgically remove
Speaker 3: larva from the screw worm. Yeah, it's insane. Uh So
Speaker 3: let's go. I mean it sounds like they screw into you, right,
Speaker 3: were like how they do it? Basically because of their
Speaker 3: hooked mouths, they're able to like dig in and dig
Speaker 3: in and just continuously burrow deeper and deeper and deeper
Speaker 3: into your.
Speaker 5: Flesh like a screw into wood.
Speaker 3: Dude. That's yes, yea, that is horribly terrifying. Uh now,
Speaker 3: let's see here it says to prevent the spread of
Speaker 3: this parasite into the US, the USDA Animal and Plant
Speaker 3: Health Inspection Service APHIS is restricting the import of livestock,
Speaker 3: including horses, from Mexico, into the United States quote pending
Speaker 3: further information from Mexican veterinary authorities on the size and
Speaker 3: scope of the infestation. Quote.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 3: The USDA also advises pet owners to check for draining
Speaker 3: or enlarged wounds, as well as signs of screwworm eggs
Speaker 3: or larvae around open wounds or oriphices. Okay, so, on
Speaker 3: top of everything else we have going on right now
Speaker 3: in this world and in our country, we now actually
Speaker 3: need to make sure we're not importing any kind of
Speaker 3: livestock from Central or South America, because if we were
Speaker 3: to eat infected meat or something like that, or even
Speaker 3: if it was to get into the main population of
Speaker 3: livestock in this country, we'd be fucked because we don't
Speaker 3: have any kind of way of preventing it. And apparently
Speaker 3: this new case is way more infectious than the previous ones.
Speaker 4: Well, and that adds in with them wanting to approve,
Speaker 4: well already approved the lab grown meat. Like that's been
Speaker 4: the big thing, is they want to keep pushing the
Speaker 4: clone meat. And that's been like a huge thing that's
Speaker 4: been happening the last couple months, is pushing the cloned
Speaker 4: meat and getting it approved and having it actually distributed
Speaker 4: to like local stores and not telling people that it's
Speaker 4: fake meat, and like that whole thing that happened last year.
Speaker 4: I don't know if it even remembers with the chicken
Speaker 4: from Walmart, like how people would show like how they
Speaker 4: would shred it and it was like fake chicken and
Speaker 4: stuff that was like and they couldn't figure out why
Speaker 4: it looks so gummy and all that stuff, and it
Speaker 4: was like weird and it had like weird stuff inside
Speaker 4: of it and like it wasn't Tyson. Tyson was one
Speaker 4: of them. Yeah, but they were showing like, I think
Speaker 4: this is fake meat. So it wouldn't surprise me that
Speaker 4: attacking our meat sources, because when you control the food
Speaker 4: and water, you control people, period.
Speaker 3: So one and I could absolutely see at some point
Speaker 3: this year new health information mandate from the government saying
Speaker 3: we can no longer trust the meat in the stores.
Speaker 3: You're only allowed to buy certified accepted meat based products
Speaker 3: aka clone meat. I absolutely could see that being a
Speaker 3: thing here in the.
Speaker 5: Next six months possibly.
Speaker 2: I just I think that you know, our government and
Speaker 2: every arm from its like every single tentacle of the government.
Speaker 5: I think that they actually hate us, bro.
Speaker 2: Like I'm gonna be real with you, like, I think
Speaker 2: that they actually hate empty And if you think about it,
Speaker 2: like all the ways that they're trying to poison you,
Speaker 2: and and like poison not only your body but your mind,
Speaker 2: and and having all these articles like well.
Speaker 3: These may be coming around.
Speaker 2: We're not sure, but we're going to forecast that this
Speaker 2: is going to come around and basically wreck humanity, So
Speaker 2: be on the lookout. It's like, no, you you're hating us,
Speaker 2: Like that's that's something that you do to somebody you hate.
Speaker 3: I think, right, this is like we say, chemical biological weapons.
Speaker 3: Actually I would just call this biological. Yeah, they're being
Speaker 3: made in a lab, but it's affecting us with live
Speaker 3: insects and live viruses and live bacteria, and they have
Speaker 3: been genetically modifying all of it. Wait till we tell
Speaker 3: you about the mirror ulteria. That's that's scary.
Speaker 4: Scary.
Speaker 2: The thing is about all this, it's that you know,
Speaker 2: they're not really doing much to prevent it. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, they're they're the ones that are create.
Speaker 2: And what's even crazy here is is that it's not
Speaker 2: even necessarily other countries that are using it as some
Speaker 2: as some kind of like bio terrorist weapon against us.
Speaker 2: This the terrorist is in the house, you know what
Speaker 2: I'm saying, Like this shit is in the house.
Speaker 3: All day.
Speaker 2: As most of the shit that goes on in this
Speaker 2: country that you know, we like to assume that it's
Speaker 2: other countries.
Speaker 3: It's always us, every time, it's us. The fox is
Speaker 3: in fact in the henhouse, if you will, which is
Speaker 3: in fact a perfect segue to our next UH endemic pandemic,
Speaker 3: global catastrophe that we plan on talking about.
Speaker 7: UH.
Speaker 3: This article is from time. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: scientists are racing to develop a new bird flu vaccine.
Speaker 4: Yes, the bird flu. This is this is a big one.
Speaker 4: So this was done on January second, Yeah.
Speaker 3: This year. Okay, this is a little over a week old.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, let's go ahead and start here.
Speaker 3: A thirteen year old girl in Canada became so sick
Speaker 3: with H five in one or bird flu, in late
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. She had to be put on a
Speaker 3: ventilator because we all know how well ventilators work. Around
Speaker 3: the same time, a senior in Louisiana was diagnosed with
Speaker 3: the first severe case in the United States that gentleman
Speaker 3: did in fact pass.
Speaker 4: As a matter of fact, the currently there are sixty
Speaker 4: six cases of humans that have been confirmed with the
Speaker 4: bird flu, and the guy that died in la. He
Speaker 4: actually he died from the mutated gene, which is kind
Speaker 4: of a complicated like explanation, but pretty much they tested
Speaker 4: all of the birds on his property and none of
Speaker 4: them they all had the original H five N one,
Speaker 4: but he actually got that, caught it, and it mutated
Speaker 4: in his body to develop into a human strand of it,
Speaker 4: leading to him dying. And so there's a whole bunch
Speaker 4: of information about which we'll get to about the infection
Speaker 4: of like how it keeps mutating. This specifically, this one virus,
Speaker 4: the H five and one is like mutated. It's every
Speaker 4: time it changes, it's continuously changing. They can't keep up with.
Speaker 3: It at all, right, same way they were talking about
Speaker 3: apparently when COVID came out, every single human on earth
Speaker 3: was a virology expert instantly, right, and somehow we all
Speaker 3: watched how this virus was supposed to be only for animals,
Speaker 3: that's how they were testing it. Then somehow it jumped
Speaker 3: to humans. But like that was, yeah, it's bad, but
Speaker 3: if it stays in the host and kills the host
Speaker 3: only then like okay, we can at least contain it.
Speaker 3: Then out of nowhere, it mutated yet again to become
Speaker 3: human to human transferable. This is when things start to
Speaker 3: take a massive downtick. You know what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, dude,
Speaker 3: I like it.
Speaker 2: You know what's sad is is that this all of
Speaker 2: this information should be shocking, it should be scary, it
Speaker 2: should be terrifying.
Speaker 3: It should be like we should be able to be.
Speaker 2: Like, you know what, this is all terrifying and everything,
Speaker 2: but like, at least our government is on the case,
Speaker 2: you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: At least our virologists are on the case.
Speaker 2: At least the World Health Organization is on the case,
Speaker 2: and they're gonna be They're gonna be working to figure
Speaker 2: it all out and whoever is going to dispel all
Speaker 2: of this. But you know what's really sad is is that,
Speaker 2: you know, through the last pandemic, we learned that they're
Speaker 2: not on our side, dude. Like it's just it's the
Speaker 2: sad facts of this reality. And so that's why you
Speaker 2: have to do your own research. You have to dig
Speaker 2: in and figure out, like what can you do if
Speaker 2: you come around, you know, a disease like this, and
Speaker 2: what are the certain things that that you can take
Speaker 2: to be able to rid yourself of of certain symptoms
Speaker 2: and stuff like that. It's it's never been a more
Speaker 2: important time to open up your own third eye for
Speaker 2: all this shit.
Speaker 3: And as we were talking about that human to human transference,
Speaker 3: it says for that to happen, the H five in
Speaker 3: one virus would have to develop the right mutations to
Speaker 3: allow it to more easily infect human cells, a process
Speaker 3: that could occur more easily if someone were to be
Speaker 3: infected with both seasonal flu and H five in one,
Speaker 3: for instance, allowing the two viruses to exchange genetic information
Speaker 3: and recombine into a strain that is readily infects and
Speaker 3: spreads among people. And they are letting us know this
Speaker 3: as we are entering flu season. This is where it's,
Speaker 3: like I said, is where it starts to take that turn.
Speaker 3: That one death in Louisiana, that is that's just a
Speaker 3: one time occurrence as of this moment. The birds on
Speaker 3: his land were infected from other birds that flew in
Speaker 3: and that mutation swap, but it was bird to bird.
Speaker 3: He got infected, probably from dealing with the fecal matter,
Speaker 3: or dealing with the feed, or or dealing with the uh.
Speaker 3: The birds actually directly, even a scratch from one of
Speaker 3: their chicken feeders, So it could have been any number
Speaker 3: of things. But again, he was an elderly gentleman, probably
Speaker 3: didn't have the best health, probably had some he had comparabilities,
Speaker 3: And I could believe that for sure. But the fact
Speaker 3: that that it is now able to make its human debut,
Speaker 3: and we are entering flu season and they are already
Speaker 3: letting us know that if you have flu and bird flu,
Speaker 3: you might be patient zero, that's kind of that's alarming.
Speaker 4: It says feces betting and directly preparing the food is
Speaker 4: how they're figuring the cases of humans. That's what they're
Speaker 4: seeing in the sixty six cases of humans that have
Speaker 4: had it so far have gotten it from that, they
Speaker 4: say that it's infected, that it's people that are working
Speaker 4: closely with these animals that are being affected. So I
Speaker 4: mean it's infecting the dairy cows big time in the US.
Speaker 4: That's been the big, the big ramping up because it
Speaker 4: was just supposed to be in birds, but now it's
Speaker 4: infecting the dairy cows so fast, and it's changing so
Speaker 4: quickly that they can't actually get ahead of it. So
Speaker 4: now our eggs are being limited. Now the dairy will
Speaker 4: be limited as well, and they've also had it in
Speaker 4: horses overseas, so it's mutating and jumping different species as well.
Speaker 3: So we need to also be on the lookout for
Speaker 3: milk to be restricted. And yes, we do know that
Speaker 3: the government has been actually coming after raw milk, which
Speaker 3: as a matter of fact, is the only reason why
Speaker 3: Trump won Pennsylvania because the federal government pissed off the
Speaker 3: entirety of the Amish community because they rated their raw
Speaker 3: milk facilities, which is how they made.
Speaker 5: A large chunk of the money.
Speaker 3: And you had horse and buggy homies roll up to
Speaker 3: cast their vote for the first time, you know. Like ever,
Speaker 3: so now as they're telling people, don't look at raw milk,
Speaker 3: don't look at the benefits of it, this, this, and this,
Speaker 3: we're gonna have to have a conversation about the bird
Speaker 3: flu infecting our milk supply. Dog of course it is.
Speaker 3: They got to go after the finer things in life,
Speaker 3: you know, agreed, ice cream is about to be gone, cheese, milk, eggs, chicken,
Speaker 3: probably beef as a subdendom to all of these things.
Speaker 3: And all of this is coming around. We're only one
Speaker 3: week into twenty twenty five. We'll just say second week now, well,
Speaker 3: fair enough, it says. Fortunately that hasn't occurred yet. The
Speaker 3: health officials aren't waiting around. Work on a vaccine is
Speaker 3: underway to protect the public in the event of a pandemic,
Speaker 3: and earlier this year, doctor Mandy Cohen, director of the
Speaker 3: US Center for Disease Control and Prevention the CDC, pointed
Speaker 3: to mr INNA as a preferred platform for the shots,
Speaker 3: since vaccines can be developed and distributed quickly. I feel
Speaker 3: like we've heard this one before, haven't we.
Speaker 4: They already have vaccines.
Speaker 3: Indeed, it says right here, is there already an age
Speaker 3: five in one vaccine? Several vaccines target H five in one.
Speaker 3: The national stockpile has doses of all of them. These
Speaker 3: shots target different strains of age five and one that
Speaker 3: were circulating when the vaccines were developed years ago, but
Speaker 3: health experts expect they will still provide some protection against
Speaker 3: severe diseases. Fortunately, current vaccine candidate neutralizes the circulating string
Speaker 3: in vitro, wrote health officials from the US National Institute
Speaker 3: of on Allergy and Infection Disease on December thirty, first
Speaker 3: editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine. A small
Speaker 3: number of healthy volunteers have been vaccinated with these H
Speaker 3: five in one vaccines, and the antibodies they generate appear
Speaker 3: to neutralize the circulating virus in lab tests, but these
Speaker 3: vaccines have not yet been tested in a clinical trial
Speaker 3: since there have not been enough H five in one
Speaker 3: infections in humans to come to compare vaccinated people to
Speaker 3: unvaccinated people. So they say they're working on something, but
Speaker 3: they don't really know at this time because it's not
Speaker 3: big enough for them to have, you know, the compare
Speaker 3: and contrast on this. What about the mRNA vaccine for
Speaker 3: H five in one. There isn't one yet, but several
Speaker 3: companies including get Ready y'all, Moderna, Pfizer, and Glascow Smith Klein,
Speaker 3: a collaborative of CureVac, are working on such a shot.
Speaker 3: In July, the US government Biometric Biomedical Advances Research and
Speaker 3: Development Authority or BARTA, awarded Maderna one hundred and seventy
Speaker 3: six million dollars to develop its updated mRNA H five
Speaker 3: in one vaccine. All of the mRNA vaccine candidates are
Speaker 3: in the early stages of testing in people for safety
Speaker 3: and efficiency efficacy excuse me, The shots rely on the
Speaker 3: same mRNA technology that was used to create COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 3: In recent weeks, scientists led by a team at the
Speaker 3: CDC reported that mRNA based H five in one vaccine
Speaker 3: can help ferrets generates ferrets, ferrets, okay, the cat snakes,
Speaker 3: all right, weird, yes, weird, shout out. It helped ferrets
Speaker 3: generate strong antibody responses against the virus and to survive
Speaker 3: a lethal dose that killed ferrets that hadn't received the vaccine.
Speaker 3: So they actually.
Speaker 4: Got more money too. They got seventy two million more.
Speaker 4: I think on the next article we'll see they actually
Speaker 4: got more money to do this. Because what's interesting about
Speaker 4: this article and the other ones is a lot of
Speaker 4: the information is conflicting because the doctors are arguing over
Speaker 4: what's going to happen with mutation. So there's doctors that
Speaker 4: are saying that the mutation is not going to be
Speaker 4: able to happen because it's going to take too much
Speaker 4: effort pretty much for the genes to be able to
Speaker 4: mix together to make the right mutation to jump to humans,
Speaker 4: to being able to spread person to person. But then
Speaker 4: you have other doctors that are saying, well, if they're
Speaker 4: infected with influenza A specifically, and this bird flu then
Speaker 4: it will be able to code itself to make a
Speaker 4: virus that actually jumps person to person. And they're saying,
Speaker 4: they're arguing that the vaccines that they have already created
Speaker 4: don't work and they're not effective, and how are they
Speaker 4: going to keep up with the ever changing and ever
Speaker 4: evolving each five in one if it's consistently changing every
Speaker 4: time it moves from person to person, or every time
Speaker 4: it moves from animal to animal. And so they gave
Speaker 4: them another seventy two mili to see about, you know,
Speaker 4: if they could figure just figure this whole thing out,
Speaker 4: because they were so affected during COVID and like, you know,
Speaker 4: they haven't hurt anybody or cause any of effects or
Speaker 4: anything on humans. But we're doing human drug trials right now.
Speaker 4: People are literally willingly signing themselves up to beginning pigs. Yeah,
Speaker 4: quote unquote that they're saying that, but you know, the
Speaker 4: homeless population, people disappear consistently all the time and nobody
Speaker 4: ever knows where they go, and so it's like, are
Speaker 4: you really or what about all the children that are
Speaker 4: gone missing? Like you need humans to be able to
Speaker 4: do these quote drug trials, but it's unethical to perform
Speaker 4: drug tiles and people that could have death as the
Speaker 4: potential unless they sign their life over.
Speaker 2: So yeah, you know, I just feel like if any like,
Speaker 2: there are a lot of people out there that have
Speaker 2: gotten the COVID vaccines, they felt very regretful because they
Speaker 2: were like, yo, I didn't really have to do that,
Speaker 2: but I chose to do it because it was to
Speaker 2: be able to protect my family members or I would
Speaker 2: scared at the time. And and look, I mean the
Speaker 2: the the varying levels of opening up of third eyes
Speaker 2: across the world. It's not you know, uh, it's not
Speaker 2: one eye opens and they all open.
Speaker 3: Everybody has their.
Speaker 2: Own gradual way of opening up their third eye. So like,
Speaker 2: I feel like, you know, the the majority of people
Speaker 2: that did get the vaccines that are feeling regretful about
Speaker 2: the situation. Now, you're not going to take a vaccine
Speaker 2: with any new virus that's going to be coming out
Speaker 2: like those people.
Speaker 3: I hope that you're not.
Speaker 2: And if you don't know what, like, don't even shoot
Speaker 2: it in your arm, just shoot it right in your
Speaker 2: fucking eyeball, like a shoot it right like right in
Speaker 2: the old Just shoot it right in your fucking cupil,
Speaker 2: because why.
Speaker 3: Not fuck that right to the right to the spinal
Speaker 3: cord straight to the brain stem, because like, that's that's
Speaker 3: clearly what's needed, right.
Speaker 4: That's like the RSV vaccine they're giving all the pregnant
Speaker 4: women and they're like eating it up. Oh yeah, and
Speaker 4: RSV has mutated and suddenly it's like the strongest has
Speaker 4: ever been and it's killing people left and right. So
Speaker 4: you know, that's a that's a whole thing. And they're
Speaker 4: pushing those vaccines on pregnant women like crazy, like, oh,
Speaker 4: they're super safe, And I'm like, have you actually read
Speaker 4: the drug trials? Like, I mean, has anybody actually done
Speaker 4: the effort to like really read into it. I don't.
Speaker 4: I don't think so.
Speaker 3: So I mean it's also crazy that they're talking about
Speaker 3: the COVID vaccines like it was a positive. Like there's
Speaker 3: still people out there that are saying like, oh, well,
Speaker 3: we know that we can trust the COVID vaccine, so
Speaker 3: we can absolutely trust this. It's like, wait, did did
Speaker 3: everybody forget how that played out? And why all these
Speaker 3: people are suffering all these insane heart palpitations and cardiovascular
Speaker 3: issues ever since they got the quote unquote superhuman safe
Speaker 3: vaccine that was not safe for human consumption whatsoever. But
Speaker 3: now they're talking about it.
Speaker 2: And if it's so, if it's such a good you know, creation,
Speaker 2: this covid vaccine and all the boosters that came along
Speaker 2: with it, why would you need.
Speaker 3: So many why would you need to get so many shots?
Speaker 3: If it was so, If it was such a good invention,
Speaker 3: like I feel like it should be kind of like
Speaker 3: a one size fits all, maybe even like a flu
Speaker 3: vaccine where you take it once a year, which I
Speaker 3: don't trust that either, but you can still with the
Speaker 3: covid vaccine, Doe. They were coming out with a new
Speaker 3: booster every two or three months, and it's like, clearly
Speaker 3: what you're doing ain't working. But people were just like, oh,
Speaker 3: I'm on my fifth booster. I feel very privileged and
Speaker 3: very virtuous. And people who aren't doing what I do.
Speaker 3: You know, you're this come of the yearth you deserve
Speaker 3: to die. I Meanwhile, you know they're all having health issues.
Speaker 3: They their heart is beating out of their chest, their
Speaker 3: blood pressures through the fucking roof. They got all of
Speaker 3: these weird things that are going on with them, and
Speaker 3: you know, unfortunately, some people just don't learn because they
Speaker 3: worship the government. They worship science. That's the new religion
Speaker 3: these days, is science. If you don't believe in it,
Speaker 3: get out of like, step out of line, because it
Speaker 3: is the new religion. And and I know the face
Speaker 3: you're just making, like it sounds ridiculous to think that
Speaker 3: people worship science, bro scientology.
Speaker 5: First off, yeah, number one.
Speaker 3: Secondly, I think that there are people who absolutely worship science.
Speaker 3: In the first place, that was just a fun joke,
Speaker 3: but like, yeah, are people that, like Fauci, you got
Speaker 3: something to say, I'm worshiping you. You got the World
Speaker 3: Health Organization saying saying something. It's almost as if they
Speaker 3: they almost view these people as if they are the
Speaker 3: voice of God. So how it's religious to these people?
Speaker 3: You know, I see the comparison your drawing. I made
Speaker 3: the face because I was like, I wouldn't necessarily say
Speaker 3: a new religion, religion, religion. I would say possibly a
Speaker 3: new creed, right, a new a new lifestyle choice, right,
Speaker 3: because like, if we're gonna get technical, no, religion is
Speaker 3: the is the new religion everybody around the world, Well,
Speaker 3: don't really do religion. I just kind of do me.
Speaker 3: That's like, that's the new vibe. But uh, as far
Speaker 3: as like people taking Fauci's word as if it's from
Speaker 3: the word of God, Yo, No, I definitely could see
Speaker 3: the comparison this point. It's kind of like a weird
Speaker 3: loosely related cult following which if we're gonna get tech,
Speaker 3: Nicol could be like, I see the comparison you're making
Speaker 3: for sure.
Speaker 4: I mean, but that plays into all the scientific experiments
Speaker 4: in the fifties, sixties, and seventies, where like, if I
Speaker 4: put on a lab coat right now, I could convince
Speaker 4: probably an entire room if I walked in there and
Speaker 4: I felt confident and I was like, this is what
Speaker 4: this is and this is I would at least probably
Speaker 4: get half those people to do whatever I want. Yeah,
Speaker 4: because they view people inherently view other people of like
Speaker 4: higher caliber or like if they are in a position
Speaker 4: of power, as their word is the correct word. And
Speaker 4: they've done tons of stuff about this. I mean, like
Speaker 4: the prison experiment is you know, that's a good that's
Speaker 4: kind of an off one, but it does also tie
Speaker 4: into it, like the one where they did the pain thing,
Speaker 4: where like they knew that they were quote hurting people,
Speaker 4: but they continue to do it anyways because they were
Speaker 4: told to do it and against and it went against
Speaker 4: their morals and ethics, and they still were like convinced
Speaker 4: that they were harming someone to the point of almost death.
Speaker 4: But like, hey, they were told to do this, So
Speaker 4: I can understand why people when you're so brainwashed in
Speaker 4: the sense of like you don't know how to do research.
Speaker 4: You don't understand what a peer review study means, how
Speaker 4: peer review studies, even though they are good, they still
Speaker 4: are being paid for by specific companies, and like Big
Speaker 4: pharmac still is like pumping out, Hey, look look at this,
Speaker 4: this is still good, blah blah blah. These are our scientists. Well,
Speaker 4: the scientists I feel bad for because there is like
Speaker 4: quite a few really good ethical scientists. And when we
Speaker 4: get into it later on about the mirror bacteria, the
Speaker 4: scientists that were involved in this have stepped away and
Speaker 4: abandoned their research because they don't feel that it's ethical
Speaker 4: at this point. Some have but like that's the problem.
Speaker 4: You have good you have good scientists, and you have
Speaker 4: bad scientists, And like the problem is is a lot
Speaker 4: of them are bought and paid for and they don't
Speaker 4: even know what their research is being used for. It's
Speaker 4: taken from them and then it's mutated and turned into
Speaker 4: these other things. And so not everyone is bad, but yes,
Speaker 4: people believe Fauci and they believe Gates because like, well,
Speaker 4: they're of higher caliber than me, and like you know,
Speaker 4: they're just brainwashed into thinking that that's what needs to happen.
Speaker 3: To your point, absolutely, if you were walking too a
Speaker 3: room with a lab coat and a clipboard and you
Speaker 3: had some charts and you spoke eloquently, oh yeah, people
Speaker 3: would listen to one hundred pcent. They wouldn't question your credentials,
Speaker 3: they wouldn't question your motives whatsoever. Because confidence, for some
Speaker 3: reason these days is a mistaken for competence. And that's
Speaker 3: something that we are seeing a lot of on the
Speaker 3: internet for sure, but absolutely within the medical community. And
Speaker 3: to your point, Jonathan, about like taking a flu shot,
Speaker 3: that's pretty much where this is going. Like if you
Speaker 3: catch the bird flu, that's one thing, But if you
Speaker 3: catch it with regular flu, that's when things are gonna
Speaker 3: go sideways here, and it's like we need to get
Speaker 3: people the flu shots. Everybody keep this in mind and
Speaker 3: please do your own research on this one. The flu
Speaker 3: shot that you go and get at the doctor may
Speaker 3: or may not even be the flu variant that you
Speaker 3: catch later. It is more or less a Russian roulette
Speaker 3: style of like four or five different ones. They think
Speaker 3: this type will be the most prevalent type this year,
Speaker 3: and we believe that based off of some study that
Speaker 3: somebody that I've never met did, and that's just what
Speaker 3: we're running with this year. Keep in mind that very
Speaker 3: well may not be the case. That may not be
Speaker 3: even be the flu virus that makes its way across
Speaker 3: the world, and it certainly may not be the one
Speaker 3: that you get exposed to. When I was in the Marines,
Speaker 3: as a matter of fact, every year that I got
Speaker 3: the flu shot, I got sickered and fuck so I
Speaker 3: just stopped taking it, or they started doing the little
Speaker 3: nasal spray type and I would just like go on
Speaker 3: the side of my nose and like do it and
Speaker 3: then go and blow it all out in a minute
Speaker 3: and like shockingly, never got sick from it. It's wild.
Speaker 3: It's but again, competency and confidence somehow are way way
Speaker 3: listed in different ways here. So now let's go ahead
Speaker 3: and read how soon can an updated vaccine be made available?
Speaker 3: As they're trying to get people on. Actually you know
Speaker 3: what hold on? Is that where it said it, Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: No, I just wanted to read that one part where
Speaker 4: it says we know the vaccines would be well tolerated
Speaker 4: and safe because they were in the context of COVID nineteen.
Speaker 4: So yeah, immediately, of course.
Speaker 3: Super safe, super already tested. We know what it does,
Speaker 3: and we know it's good. And it's like, I got
Speaker 3: three former coworkers that are still suffering from not being
Speaker 3: able to smell or taste, and one of them actually
Speaker 3: had a band member of his he's in a band.
Speaker 3: One of them died of a heart attack only a
Speaker 3: few months after getting the shot.
Speaker 5: But totally safe for humans, and we know that apparently.
Speaker 2: Well that's not the It's not because the vaccines were bad, Jacob,
Speaker 2: That's just because the flu, the sickness was it was
Speaker 2: so bad that it wrecked these people. And sometimes the
Speaker 2: vaccines just can't get everything.
Speaker 3: So yeah, keep in mind that band member played the horn,
Speaker 3: meaning he had really good lung capacity. Is his his
Speaker 3: cardio was really good. Yes, he was a little overweight,
Speaker 3: but it's not like he wasn't used to using his
Speaker 3: lungs efficiently and somehow he gets a flu so bad
Speaker 3: that he has to go get a shot and then
Speaker 3: he dies from something respiratory. Yeah, that totally checks out.
Speaker 3: But you're right, Jonathan, and you're right CDC, and you're
Speaker 3: right Fauci. It wasn't the vaccine, it wasn't the sickness.
Speaker 3: It's because he didn't follow their rules to the or
Speaker 3: the mandates to the letter of the of the paper.
Speaker 3: That's what it was. Percent Anyway, let's read on here.
Speaker 3: Another way to avoid that delay and reduce the number
Speaker 3: of people who become sick with a pandemic level bird
Speaker 3: flu is by developing and distributing a more broadly targeted vaccine. Ah. Yes,
Speaker 3: who must cast a wider net to catch more people.
Speaker 3: Of course, Influenza comes in four main subtypes ABC and
Speaker 3: D and two A and B cause most infections in people.
Speaker 3: H five and one. Oh my god, I'm so tired
Speaker 3: of this article doing that. One is an A type. Hinsley,
Speaker 3: which is one of the doctors developed a vaccine candidate
Speaker 3: that can recognize all twenty of the A and B
Speaker 3: influenza's subtypes. So all right, right off, rip, there's four
Speaker 3: main types, and A and B have twenty subtypes.
Speaker 4: Including the H five N one that's found to generate
Speaker 4: strong immune responses in mice and ferrets.
Speaker 3: Right because again it's this just makes more sense. In addition,
Speaker 3: when the vaccine or vaccinative ferrets were exposed to slightly
Speaker 3: different influenza variants within those subtypes, they still produce good
Speaker 3: immune responses against them. While the vaccine didn't protect the
Speaker 3: animals from getting infected, they didn't get as sick. Okay,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna say that one one more time for those
Speaker 3: in the back. While the vaccines didn't protect the animals
Speaker 3: from getting infected, they didn't get as sick.
Speaker 4: That's a lot of the vaccines. So as they don't
Speaker 4: protect against the infection, it protects against quote unquote house
Speaker 4: that you can get. But as long as you don't
Speaker 4: have cormorbidities or any other type of infection. That's what
Speaker 4: they supposedly are. That's what it's supposed to do, which
Speaker 4: there is the original style of vaccines were created in
Speaker 4: a correct way to be able to stop things like this,
Speaker 4: and they weren't intended in a malicious way to harmony,
Speaker 4: but this was actually they were. They were created to
Speaker 4: help and they did it. Wasn't until they started mutating
Speaker 4: what they put inside vaccines in the late eighties and
Speaker 4: early nineties. Eighty eight and ninety two is when they
Speaker 4: developed vaccines that are more dangerous for people. And then
Speaker 4: they've continued to add in more things like the heavy
Speaker 4: metals and things like that, and they've changed like using
Speaker 4: the mRNA sequences and adding in human genomes and stuff
Speaker 4: like that is when people started to actually like when
Speaker 4: the rise of you know, mysterious and like illnesses quote
Speaker 4: unquote has happened. So originally like added an original form.
Speaker 4: It makes sense because you're protecting against the subtypes and stuff.
Speaker 4: The problem is is what's the added fillers into these
Speaker 4: that's gonna cause issues within the human body that they
Speaker 4: can't actually get rid of those extra additives.
Speaker 3: Right, I mean again, I feel like we've heard all
Speaker 3: of this before. This is kind of the same book,
Speaker 3: different chapter, and they're already letting us know what to
Speaker 3: expect within the first month of this year. It's yeah, anyway,
Speaker 3: so the vaccines are not going to prevent anything. They
Speaker 3: may quote unquote help the sickness not get as bad.
Speaker 3: So let's read here. It says who should get vaccinated
Speaker 3: against age five in one. Because the CDC says the
Speaker 3: risk of bird flu is still low for the general public,
Speaker 3: there are no recommendations for anyone in the United States
Speaker 3: to get vaccinated against H five in one at the moment.
Speaker 3: Some experts believe dairy workers and others who have close
Speaker 3: contact with animals likely to be infected should such as
Speaker 3: poultry and cattle, should be vaccinated to protect the from infection,
Speaker 3: but the US Health officials have not made this decision yet.
Speaker 3: Nothing that a full understanding of the risk of H
Speaker 3: five and one to people, and the benefits of vaccine
Speaker 3: aren't entirely clear.
Speaker 4: Good to Finland, yeah, making sure that they vaccinated all
Speaker 4: the people.
Speaker 3: Finland has offered people at higher risk of exposure to
Speaker 3: bird flu, including those in the fur industry who handle
Speaker 3: wild bores and those in the poultry industry, a bird
Speaker 3: flu vaccine made by Sekuris, which uses a more traditional
Speaker 3: vaccine technology that includes an inactivated form of the virus.
Speaker 4: So not a live virus, but it's the virus it's
Speaker 4: self contained inside. And you know who that brand is
Speaker 4: that that's the Indians or that's the group overseas that
Speaker 4: makes like all the big vaccines. Oh that's no, they're
Speaker 4: like in India, it's the Prince of Vaccines that's at
Speaker 4: his comps and like that. They're buddy buddy that have
Speaker 4: like multiple fick pictures with Bill Gates and stuff for
Speaker 4: the last two decades.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is the same group.
Speaker 3: Which is interesting that India's being brought up currently in
Speaker 3: the Bill Gates because as we get to cholera, that's
Speaker 3: a whole other thing that's about to get brought up.
Speaker 5: And India's getting smacked.
Speaker 3: But well we'll get to that in a minute. Anyway,
Speaker 3: we're gonna move on from the H five N one
Speaker 3: bird flu and these types of things.
Speaker 4: Actually, you know what, Yeah, that's just talking about the
Speaker 4: first death and stuff. It's just the information that we
Speaker 4: covered about how it mutated in the guy itself instead
Speaker 4: of being mutated from the chickens, because they took all
Speaker 4: of the animals from his land to try and make
Speaker 4: sure that it wasn't infected that way.
Speaker 3: So, you know what, we can read this first one
Speaker 3: here because this I didn't know these things. In the
Speaker 3: nearly nine months since the first human case of bird
Speaker 3: flu was detecting the United States, the viruses continued to spread.
Speaker 3: By the way ABC News, the outbreak infected hundreds of
Speaker 3: herds and millions of birds before it spread to humans.
Speaker 3: As of January sixth, there have been sixty six human
Speaker 3: care of bird flu reported in ten states, including the
Speaker 3: data from the Center of Disease and Control of Prevention CDC.
Speaker 3: Almost all confirmed cases involved direct contact with infected cattle
Speaker 3: or infected livestock. And on Tuesday, the first death of
Speaker 3: a human bird flu patient was reported in Louisiana. The
Speaker 3: patient was over age, over the age of sixty five
Speaker 3: and had underlying medical conditions, according to health officials. So
Speaker 3: and we've already talked a good bit about these things.
Speaker 3: But the outbreak infected hundreds of herds and millions of birds. Okay,
Speaker 3: and since January sixth. As of January sixth, there have
Speaker 3: been sixty six human cases in ten states. Only one
Speaker 3: of those have led to death. But the year is young,
Speaker 3: So yeah, the article kind of goes more into this,
Speaker 3: but here we go. Here's a picture the map of
Speaker 3: thirty seven cases in California, they're kind of leading the charge,
Speaker 3: ten in Colorado, two in Michigan, and then all these
Speaker 3: other states. Oh I'm sorry, eleven in Washington, and then
Speaker 3: the rest of these states only have one apiece is Louisiana, Missouri, misery,
Speaker 3: excuse me, Iowa and Oregon and Wisconsin.
Speaker 4: So organ is like locked down right now because that's
Speaker 4: where my family's from. And they're like really pushing this
Speaker 4: bird flu thing.
Speaker 3: Up there with one case.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I no, like when it happened two years ago,
Speaker 4: three years ago, they went crazy up there with this
Speaker 4: bird flu thing, and so now they're like super like
Speaker 4: panicking and like making people freak out about it a lot,
Speaker 4: and they consistently talk about it, and like people are
Speaker 4: like covering up all of their stuff to make sure
Speaker 4: that they don't get any any of the chickens get
Speaker 4: it and stuff. But apparently they're having like a severe
Speaker 4: shortage of eggs in certain parts. And I just talked
Speaker 4: to my mom about that today and I was like, Oh, okay,
Speaker 4: was it.
Speaker 5: Oregon or Washington that had chazz?
Speaker 4: That was that was Washington?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Was it Washington? Okay? Yeah, that was in Seattle
Speaker 3: or in Portland. Now, because I always I see those
Speaker 3: two states the same thing. I know that you're gonna
Speaker 3: get mad at that, But when you say Washington or Oregon,
Speaker 3: these it's the same picture. That's what.
Speaker 2: That's probably why I got to confuse that it's the
Speaker 2: top two states on the left.
Speaker 3: It's like when you're talking about Vermont versus New Hampshire.
Speaker 3: It's the same picture. It's the same thing. I don't
Speaker 3: I don't really see a distinction between the two. They're
Speaker 3: liberal white people that are screaming in the northeast.
Speaker 8: You know what I mean.
Speaker 4: It actually says I think it was in Oregon.
Speaker 3: I thought it was in Portland.
Speaker 4: Portland. I don't know. The Portland's a cesspool. It's always
Speaker 4: been a cesspool. It always will be a cess pool.
Speaker 4: Like I've never liked the damn city. I've lived outside
Speaker 4: of it. I live further out, but I've never never
Speaker 4: liked Portland.
Speaker 3: But this, this is also why we say what we say,
Speaker 3: and we don't mean to offend. But when we say
Speaker 3: Washington or Oregon, it's interchangeable dialogue.
Speaker 4: It is not at all very much. It sucks there
Speaker 4: are more liberals in Washington. That's not like just saying
Speaker 4: like at least Oregon has like pop it's like their
Speaker 4: Eugene in Portland, and like.
Speaker 3: Washington's got pockets.
Speaker 4: No, it's like the majority of that damn state, and
Speaker 4: they suck. They have way more they have worse weather
Speaker 4: than we do.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they're more north. They just keep living in the North.
Speaker 3: I don't get it.
Speaker 4: It just whatever. I hate Washington.
Speaker 3: Washington listeners as the Oregon Trail too, you know, so
Speaker 3: that's pretty everybody terry.
Speaker 4: Honestly, though, the Oregon Trail is really cool. You can
Speaker 4: actually go and see like parts of the trail itself
Speaker 4: that have still like the rope wrapped around it to
Speaker 4: where they're trying to lower the wagons, and like the
Speaker 4: big trees because we have huge trees. It's like engraved
Speaker 4: deep inside of it to where, yeah, to where you
Speaker 4: can see like all of the like actual organ trail
Speaker 4: parts of it. You can walk a good majority of
Speaker 4: it too. Like we did camps as kids, and we
Speaker 4: go out there and like learn how to make butter
Speaker 4: and like learn how to shave like old time and
Speaker 4: then like all that kind of stuff, And it's pretty cool. Honestly.
Speaker 4: We have a lot a lot cooler stuff for cool
Speaker 4: than down here in the South.
Speaker 3: That's what I'm not saying much about education.
Speaker 4: Like hey there's a gator.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, for sure, dude, there was a Did y'all
Speaker 3: ever play that Oregon Trail? Yes, I think it was
Speaker 3: on the computer.
Speaker 4: I know someone that's beaten it.
Speaker 3: Really that was one of the one person.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, one person. I did get pretty far at
Speaker 4: one point, I will say I got pretty far, but yeah,
Speaker 4: I know I got taken out. Because we would play
Speaker 4: at school. We would get to play it like once
Speaker 4: a month. Everyone would get to go and play for
Speaker 4: like an hour on our little computers, and so it
Speaker 4: was like a whole thing. That's I love the Organ Trail.
Speaker 3: I don't think.
Speaker 5: Only that one day some kind of disease or some ship.
Speaker 5: You're always dying that.
Speaker 3: Way, always, my God. So anyway, all right, I do
Speaker 3: want to read a little bit more onto this one.
Speaker 3: Here it says a direct quote from Moody.
Speaker 4: The guy that's arguing that, like I'm shocked.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, okay, So, given the number of cows that
Speaker 3: have been infected, the number of birds that have been infected,
Speaker 3: and the fact that the virus essentially mutates every time
Speaker 3: it's replicates, I'm kind of surprised that the mutations, that
Speaker 3: the mutations that they're talking about haven't happened yet. So
Speaker 3: I actually think there's a bigger barrier to it becoming
Speaker 3: a real problem. So he's saying that, yeah, it's spreading
Speaker 3: in animals, but not many humans have it yet, maybe
Speaker 3: it's not that big of a deal.
Speaker 4: And then the next paragraph down is this other guy
Speaker 4: that talks about how he's like, oh, no, it's going
Speaker 4: to be a big issue because like if you have
Speaker 4: the bird flu in seasonal influenza, then you're gonna get
Speaker 4: infected and then it's going to mutate. So it's like
Speaker 4: they can't decide what they actually want to say about
Speaker 4: this whole situation. So this is just another thing in
Speaker 4: the list that we are going down of potential plandemics
Speaker 4: or issues that are going to rise up.
Speaker 3: So one hundred percent. And again, as we are we're
Speaker 3: very very early in this year, the information about this
Speaker 3: is very new, so they're throwing out certain things that
Speaker 3: I feel like they know are untrue and certain things
Speaker 3: that they know are kind of based in some fact.
Speaker 3: But that's the thing. It's not a worry as of
Speaker 3: this moment until it becomes a worry, and then that's
Speaker 3: thing once it mutates and jumps human to human that
Speaker 3: first time, that's it. Everything's fucked. There's no put in
Speaker 3: Pandora back in the box. So we just want to
Speaker 3: go down and list and talk about that. Now we're
Speaker 3: going to go into NPR here, And as a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, it's only a four minute listen. And you
Speaker 3: know how these NPR articles, you can listen to them
Speaker 3: talk about it or read the article about it. I
Speaker 3: don't have an issue with listening to four minutes of
Speaker 3: them explaining how this new gene editing tool may help
Speaker 3: wipe out mosquito born diseases, especially seeing as how so
Speaker 3: many of these things are in fact transferred via mosquito.
Speaker 3: So let's go ahead and have a little listen.
Speaker 10: Mosquitos are on the move. Global trade and climate change
Speaker 10: have helped disease carrying species, but scientists have developed tools
Speaker 10: that they believe may help them control and possibly eradicate
Speaker 10: mosquitoes that carry malaria and other diseases from Miami.
Speaker 3: Here's NPR's Greg.
Speaker 11: Allen in the age Old war Mann versus mosquitoes. The
Speaker 11: bugs have been winning. At least seven hundred thousand people
Speaker 11: die every year from mosquito born diseases such as malaria, dengay,
Speaker 11: West Nile, and yellow fever.
Speaker 3: In the US.
Speaker 11: Denay is now a persistent problem in Florida, Texas and
Speaker 11: other states. Last year, for the first time in decades,
Speaker 11: Florida and Texas reported locally acquired malaria cases. Maryland also
Speaker 11: had a case, but Andrea Leal, the head of mosquito
Speaker 11: control in the Florida Keys, says help is on the way.
Speaker 12: The good news is we've got these emerging technologies that
Speaker 12: are showing great promise and reducing eighties at Gypti mosquitos.
Speaker 11: The eighties at Gypti mosquito loves to feed on people
Speaker 11: and has become a significant health threat across the southern US.
Speaker 3: Leal's a agen.
Speaker 11: He became the first in the US to partner with
Speaker 11: a company, Oxytech, that's testing a new means of mosquito
Speaker 11: control using gene editing. Oxytech has developed male mosquitoes that
Speaker 11: when they mate, produce female offspring that don't survive to adulthood.
Speaker 11: Females are the mosquitoes that bite, spreading denge and other diseases.
Speaker 11: Over the last three years, Oxytech released limited numbers of
Speaker 11: its bioengineered male mosquitos in the Florida Keys. Oxytech hasn't
Speaker 11: released the results of those trials yet, but in a
Speaker 11: twenty twenty two study in Brazil, the company showed the
Speaker 11: technology reduced populations over ninety percent in some areas. Oxytech's CEO,
Speaker 11: Gray Franzen says now the company's mosquito control technology is
Speaker 11: used widely there.
Speaker 9: Now the product is being deployed in every state in Brazil,
Speaker 9: including in the heart of the Amazon, where the Amazon
Speaker 9: Tourism Authority has selected Oxytech to deploy around tourism sites
Speaker 9: because they are in essence rejecting the need to deploy
Speaker 9: chemical pesticides.
Speaker 11: Along with Oxytech, many research organizations are now focused on
Speaker 11: using gene editing to combat mosquitoes. A major plus is
Speaker 11: that it can be used on any species, including those
Speaker 11: that transmit malaria. Oxy Tech is working on three species
Speaker 11: of malaria mosquitos and is be tossed about conducting trials
Speaker 11: in Uganda. Eric Karragata, an entomologist at the University of Florida,
Speaker 11: says there's growing evidence that gene editing technology will be
Speaker 11: an important tool in reducing the spread of dengey malaria
Speaker 11: and other diseases.
Speaker 13: If you use a product like that, you have the
Speaker 13: potential to drastically reduce the number of mosquitoes that are
Speaker 13: in an area, and hopefully that would be accompanied by
Speaker 13: a decrease in the number of cases.
Speaker 11: At the University of California, San Diego, omar Akbari is
Speaker 11: using gene editing to target a mosquito species that carries malaria.
Speaker 11: He calls gene editing a game changer that he believes,
Speaker 11: if scaled up and maintained, can wipe out the eighties
Speaker 11: Egypti mosquito from North America.
Speaker 3: I think it's going to be difficult, but I don't
Speaker 3: think it's impossible because they have been erected before using insecticides,
Speaker 3: and these are new technologies.
Speaker 11: But there's been public resistance and concerns about the possible
Speaker 11: environmental impact of releasing bioengineered mosquitos. The three years of
Speaker 11: trials and the keys were conducted to show federal and
Speaker 11: state regulators that the technology is environmentally safe and effective,
Speaker 11: and in recent years, frans And says he's seen a
Speaker 11: shift in the question say staff is getting from the public.
Speaker 9: The question is no longer do these technologies have a role,
Speaker 9: Are these technologies appropriate for communities? Can they develop public support?
Speaker 9: The questions we're getting now is how quickly can we
Speaker 9: get these technologies to new communities that need it the most.
Speaker 11: Oxy Tech is hoping to receive approval from the EPA
Speaker 11: and make its mosquito control technology available commercially in the
Speaker 11: US within the next two years.
Speaker 3: So let's talk about old oxy Tech, shall we, Because
Speaker 3: a couple of things that they just mentioned are very
Speaker 3: conflicting with what articles we're finding. It's like every other
Speaker 3: article conflicts the one and you just read before it,
Speaker 3: and then you'll find another one that conflicts both of
Speaker 3: those articles that you just read. All of them are
Speaker 3: from official bodies and official medical professionals, and all of
Speaker 3: these things. There's so many unknowns that they can't even
Speaker 3: pinpoint what is known about it. But oxy Tech seems
Speaker 3: to be the uh, the ones spearheading a lot of
Speaker 3: this research.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so they they currently their biggest contributor is the
Speaker 4: Gates Foundation.
Speaker 3: Shocker.
Speaker 4: I think they got forty eight million dollars from them
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty two, and they also just got another
Speaker 4: lump sun. They are located overseas by Oxford University, and
Speaker 4: I don't know if people remember this, but I've talked
Speaker 4: about the connections how they all connect, Oxford University and
Speaker 4: the Bill Gates Foundation and the Prince the Princes over
Speaker 4: there with their lovely vaccine thing. They're the first ones
Speaker 4: to actually start working on COVID vaccines years before COVID
Speaker 4: quote unquote was released. And it's kind of all ties
Speaker 4: into each other, and they kind of have money that
Speaker 4: like flips back and forth between the vaccines and malaria.
Speaker 4: The malaria vaccines that they've actually been distributing is a
Speaker 4: part of the same group, so they actually all got
Speaker 4: money from the same places essentially and are trying to,
Speaker 4: you know, just do the good of God and help everyone.
Speaker 4: But all the information is not it's they're saying that
Speaker 4: it's working, that it's working around the Brazilian tourist locations,
Speaker 4: that they had a ninety percent rate of being able
Speaker 4: to kill off the female population, because that's the big
Speaker 4: thing is the females are the ones that are biding.
Speaker 4: But I'm not quite sure. I cannot find the actual
Speaker 4: data or the statistics on it. So like I've tried
Speaker 4: to find all that information, but I cannot actually find
Speaker 4: the information. But on their website they say they're completely
Speaker 4: transparent and you can reach out to them, they'll actually
Speaker 4: give you the stuff. But I've read their entire website
Speaker 4: all the way through, and I can't find the actual
Speaker 4: data on what's how are they actually saying that it's
Speaker 4: working or not because there's no data being shown what's
Speaker 4: happening in the US.
Speaker 3: That's that study that was done in the keys. You
Speaker 3: can't find the actual results of that study. Like and
Speaker 3: it's not that uh.
Speaker 4: They said they haven't released it, quote unquote, but that's
Speaker 4: been two years.
Speaker 3: Two years ago they did that study and they still
Speaker 3: aren't talking about what they found with the results. We're
Speaker 3: just supposed to take their word at it. That yep,
Speaker 3: ninety percent success rate. Okay, can we look at it?
Speaker 4: Ah, Yeah, what do you think, Jonathan?
Speaker 2: Well, I'm looking at it right here, and it says
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two, this is for oxy Tech, but
Speaker 2: it says in twenty twenty two, five million mosquitoes were released,
Speaker 2: So they already did this shit, Like this is not
Speaker 2: even something that's in the in the works. It's like,
Speaker 2: you know what, And that's what I I have such
Speaker 2: a hard time in understanding how they're able to like
Speaker 2: pass this because who voted on allowing genetically modified mosquitoes
Speaker 2: with vaccines inside of them?
Speaker 14: Like?
Speaker 3: Who who voted on that to even allow that kind
Speaker 3: of shit. Nobody votes on this.
Speaker 4: No, they don't have vaccines inside of them. What they're
Speaker 4: doing is the five million that they released is what
Speaker 4: they did is is they take the take the males,
Speaker 4: and they add in a gene sequence and when there's
Speaker 4: actually a really cool video on YouTube about it, but
Speaker 4: they show you they actually add in the gene sequence.
Speaker 4: So every time they mate with a female, their offspring
Speaker 4: will have the likelihood to carry on this gene. And
Speaker 4: it will also if the when they have female mosquito babies,
Speaker 4: it will kill them faster than they can reproduce. That's
Speaker 4: the whole process of it. It's the technology is really
Speaker 4: fascinating because this isn't the first time. In nineteen twenty
Speaker 4: eight is when they actually started genetically trying to modify
Speaker 4: bugs and stuff to be able to make sure that
Speaker 4: they could kill the bad gyce. And like Lessen, there's
Speaker 4: the practicality is there. The problem is is like if
Speaker 4: Bill Gates actually gets a hold of those mosquitos like
Speaker 4: he's talked about and like putting the vaccines in it,
Speaker 4: I don't know how they would distribute that without killing
Speaker 4: the the host. But it could be in the gene
Speaker 4: sequence itself, because the genomes is how it's doing it.
Speaker 4: But they aren't being as effective fast enough with the
Speaker 4: other type of bioengineered mosquitos. This would be the quote
Speaker 4: fastest way to kill off a population, but they're still
Speaker 4: meaning there's still gonna be males hanging out and like
Speaker 4: they might find females they might be able to reproduce.
Speaker 4: Like it takes quite a process. But I haven't found
Speaker 4: where they actually voted on it, where they talked about it.
Speaker 4: Locos race a lot of concern. A lot of people said, hey,
Speaker 4: we don't want to do this, and they were like,
Speaker 4: it's okay, we're gonna do it. Anyways, they dropped them
Speaker 4: in the Keys, but also when we did our last
Speaker 4: episode about malaria, I found that they dropped them in
Speaker 4: Texas as well. So yeah, you got little bioengineered mosquitos
Speaker 4: out there with you.
Speaker 3: And that's the thing. They they're not gonna let us
Speaker 3: have a say so and if this gets you know,
Speaker 3: released for an experiment or not, because anything to reduce
Speaker 3: the mosquito population, do we even need to vote on it?
Speaker 3: I mean, come on, But the problem is even the
Speaker 3: experts have acknowledged that Okay, yes, making less female mosquitos
Speaker 3: means less people get bit and like, in theory, that's great.
Speaker 3: You're telling me that you successfully did this to five
Speaker 3: hundred mosquitoes and whatever your test results are that you
Speaker 3: claim are positive, but you're still not willing to release it.
Speaker 3: Sounds a lot like the whole Gain of Function research
Speaker 3: where they were clear about how positive this was, but
Speaker 3: they won't release what the lab test actually showed. Again,
Speaker 3: it's kind of like a rinser repeat and this company's
Speaker 3: leading the charge on it. This uh Oxaxy, that's the one.
Speaker 3: And I'm got the website it. Oh, I say five hundred, Yeah,
Speaker 3: you said five million, My bad, My bad, But this
Speaker 3: is their website and you can you know, anybody could
Speaker 3: look this up. Oxy Tech and they're talking about how
Speaker 3: this is so cool. Look at this about our sparks
Speaker 3: Waalbakia Technology. Sparks is a new global platform to scale
Speaker 3: Waalbakia replacement technology, a proven solution to reduce dingay. Sparks
Speaker 3: will complement Oxytect's groundbreaking mosquito solution Friendly, which is leading
Speaker 3: the dingay vector suppression solution that effectively reduces disease spreading
Speaker 3: mosquito populations. That friendly thing, let's good and read about
Speaker 3: that one real quick. The Friendly technology, and that's a
Speaker 3: trademark on that word. Friendly platform delivers a targeted, non toxic,
Speaker 3: and environmentally sustainable solution for controlling pests that spread disease,
Speaker 3: threatened food production, or harm ecosystems. Friendly males carry a
Speaker 3: self limiting gene that, when passed on, prevents the offspring
Speaker 3: from surviving to adulthood. With regular release of friendly males,
Speaker 3: the number of offspring. In most versions of the technology,
Speaker 3: specifically damage the female offspring is reduced, resulting in a
Speaker 3: reduction in the pest insect population. Friendly Mail and Auspring
Speaker 3: and Carrie. The self limiting gene can be tracked through
Speaker 3: the linked in linked fluorescent marker gene.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they actually glow, so that's that was their big
Speaker 4: thing when they release them, was they told them that they, hey,
Speaker 4: we can actually track how many of our males have survived,
Speaker 4: and so they glow in the light. They can actually
Speaker 4: see which ones are the males and which ones aren't.
Speaker 4: So that way the population quote unquote didn't get out
Speaker 4: of hand.
Speaker 3: So the future is now you're telling me we could
Speaker 3: just shine a black light at night and see which
Speaker 3: mosquitoes are and are not genetically modified or whatever the
Speaker 3: light may be. That is fucking wild.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 4: They they're supposed to glow in the light with a
Speaker 4: marker on them to be able to see if they
Speaker 4: actually belong to this company or not, which is interesting
Speaker 4: because they wonder if they're actually tracking the movements of
Speaker 4: their mosquitos, like they just release them, and like they
Speaker 4: just you know whatever. I mean, they don't just they
Speaker 4: don't just have mosquitoes. They have a whole bunch of
Speaker 4: bugs that they've actually on their website that they've released.
Speaker 4: So this specific one that they're talking about is for
Speaker 4: America itself because this type is the one that we
Speaker 4: eradicated through in sexicides and then is come back. And
Speaker 4: so this is why they are pushing it so hard
Speaker 4: here is they want to get the FDA approval or
Speaker 4: the Environmental approval EPA and so that way they can
Speaker 4: use it more.
Speaker 3: To further your point, it says right here the friendly method.
Speaker 3: This method can be applied to all kinds of pests
Speaker 3: from the mosquitoes that transmit diseases such as the zeica
Speaker 3: and dingay to moth caterpillars that destroy maize fields. Okay,
Speaker 3: they now are developing a friendly tick and the technology
Speaker 3: has the potential to be applied to animals beyond arthropods.
Speaker 3: So they're talking about caterpillars, ticks, mosquitoes, flies, anything.
Speaker 5: That really affects humans in some way, shape or form.
Speaker 5: And yeah, they're just.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there's like a whole list up like you can
Speaker 4: actually find it in there. I forget where it is.
Speaker 4: The technology, I think is where you can see the
Speaker 4: list of who they how many they have stuff, Our
Speaker 4: friendly males, that's where it's at.
Speaker 3: Check it out our friendly met woo.
Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, so this is all there. This is all
Speaker 4: their bioengineered group right now of what they have what
Speaker 4: m hm.
Speaker 3: So I see different types of mosquitoes, I see an
Speaker 3: army worm, I see soybean looper, I see medfly, diamondback moth,
Speaker 3: cattle tick. Look at this, m hm.
Speaker 4: And they also have a hand in a sustainability project
Speaker 4: as well. And it's not just this company. This company
Speaker 4: is leading the charge. There was another company and I
Speaker 4: don't know what happened to it, but yeah, this is
Speaker 4: their friendly I don't know why they I guess they're
Speaker 4: trying to make it seem like, you know, yay team,
Speaker 4: but this is their friendly group that they're trying to
Speaker 4: eradicate the bad bugs, see right there at the bottom.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's go ahead and talk about their partners and
Speaker 3: funders at the bottom. Here we have the University of Oxford,
Speaker 3: the BBSRC, which is the Bioscience of the Future, the
Speaker 3: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Yes I know, Oker, everybody
Speaker 3: well come, which is W E. L Comme, And the
Speaker 3: India Tuba, which is a U. I don't even know
Speaker 3: how to say that, Pensundo m vock posts, I don't
Speaker 3: even know, but either way it goes. They're getting funding
Speaker 3: from big name organizations, big government groups, and University of
Speaker 3: Oxford is not exactly a half stepper in the realm
Speaker 3: of labs and medical science and technology being discovered and explored.
Speaker 4: So yeah, those three that I said, the India how
Speaker 4: India is tightened, University of Oxford, and the Gates Foundation.
Speaker 4: They have their hand in a lot of different projects
Speaker 4: that have shown that they aren't the most positive. Like
Speaker 4: in theory, a lot of this stuff sounds really really great,
Speaker 4: but like it's the are they actually damaging people? The
Speaker 4: ecosystem because like, yes, mosquito suck and they kill a
Speaker 4: lot of people. But what happens when you remove a
Speaker 4: food source for quite a few things, So then what happens, right,
Speaker 4: So then those food sources get just like so then
Speaker 4: we're killing off whole ecosystem, like you can't. I don't know.
Speaker 4: I'm just kind of confused. Is like they talk about
Speaker 4: that all the time, but yet somehow we're we're doing this.
Speaker 3: So I agree. Look, they were talking about reintroducing wolves
Speaker 3: to certain areas they have, right, they're talking, Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 3: they release the neutral rat into Louisiana to help something.
Speaker 3: They released mongoose mongeese on Hawaii's islands to help a
Speaker 3: certain rat population or fight them off. Instead, they just
Speaker 3: one was nocturnal and one was whatever the version of
Speaker 3: the day is. So basically they both doubled down and
Speaker 3: fucked up the local bird population. Like every time they
Speaker 3: try to introduce something that wasn't naturally there, it plays poorly. So, yes,
Speaker 3: we need to start genetically modifying certain sections of the
Speaker 3: circle of life because the ecosystem really just needs that.
Speaker 4: But these mosquitoes that are here in the United States,
Speaker 4: the ones that they're talking about are daytime biers and
Speaker 4: the ones that they've been making are nighttime, so like like,
Speaker 4: are you gonna make them able to be day?
Speaker 15: Like?
Speaker 4: Are you going to take the same species. I didn't
Speaker 4: find that until I read a different article about that,
Speaker 4: and I was like, oh, okay, wow, this is just
Speaker 4: summarizing their funding stuff. So pretty much the same thing
Speaker 4: we just talked about. This is you can actually go
Speaker 4: and look for their investors and funds and like, you know,
Speaker 4: what have they gotten where? You know, where have they
Speaker 4: gotten it from? This is an older one, so they've
Speaker 4: gotten more money now from This is from yeah, this
Speaker 4: is from.
Speaker 3: Twenty yeah, two thousand and two.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so they've gotten a lot more money since then.
Speaker 3: It was last update of January ninth of this year,
Speaker 3: so at least this article or at least they started
Speaker 3: tracking them back then.
Speaker 5: So let's hear funding rounds.
Speaker 3: They've got four rounds of seed funding, three early stage
Speaker 3: rounds of funding, and three grant prize money checks that
Speaker 3: were cut to them. They've got a total funding of
Speaker 3: about twenty six point four million. The largest round was
Speaker 3: eighteen million of that and eleven institutional investors. All of
Speaker 3: this is for the oxy Tech Funding Group. Let's see here,
Speaker 3: we actually have a list right here in twenty twenty two. Actually,
Speaker 3: so at the beginning they don't show it.
Speaker 4: No, it's redactive. Well you can't see it. So, yeah,
Speaker 4: I got forty eight million, wrong, I excellently put being
Speaker 4: next to it's eighteen million from the Bill Gates Foundation.
Speaker 3: My bad, And that was in twenty twenty two. But like, okay,
Speaker 3: so gotten more from it. Yeah, So from two thousand
Speaker 3: and two to two thousand and nine, we know they
Speaker 3: received funding. We don't know how much, we don't know
Speaker 3: from who or in any way, shape or form, but
Speaker 3: we know that for seven years they were receiving money
Speaker 3: from some pody Right then June twenty six, twenty twenty four,
Speaker 3: ten million dollars comes from the Oxford Capital and East
Speaker 3: Hill Management Company. They got a couple of more amounts,
Speaker 3: but these are redacted. In twenty fifteen they got three
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy four thousand dollars. That was grant prize money.
Speaker 3: September fifteen. I'm sorry, June first, twenty fifteen, three hundred
Speaker 3: and seventy six. I just I just said that one.
Speaker 3: My bad. September fifteenth, twenty fifteen one hundred and seventy
Speaker 3: two thousand dollars in grant mine. In April twenty second
Speaker 3: of twenty twenty one, they got six point eight million
Speaker 3: dollars from the well Come Foundation, and April twenty at
Speaker 3: the twenty twenty two they received eighteen million grant prize
Speaker 3: money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Jonathan, where
Speaker 3: are you at with this?
Speaker 7: Bro?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 2: Anytime I see that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Speaker 2: has anything to do with it, I just assume that
Speaker 2: it's bad personally. I mean, yeah, it sounds like a
Speaker 2: pretty good idea because it's not necessarily eradicating mosquitoes. It's
Speaker 2: just making it to where they can't necessarily carry any
Speaker 2: kind of infectious disease.
Speaker 5: Right, That's how this works.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and so and and the males can't buy you.
Speaker 5: It's only the females that are doing it.
Speaker 2: So they're basically only doing it to the females.
Speaker 3: Well, they're doing it to the males in an attempt
Speaker 3: to kill the females in their egg form.
Speaker 4: Ah Okay, they don't know. They don't reach adulthood to
Speaker 4: be able to rep so the females are still being born,
Speaker 4: but they're supposed to die out in the adolescent stage,
Speaker 4: so they don't reach adulthood. And then the males that
Speaker 4: are born from this pairing are carrying the next set
Speaker 4: of sequencing to be able to self limit. So the
Speaker 4: self limiting is the ones that they've created, they will
Speaker 4: die out and they have the blue glow to them,
Speaker 4: and then the next ones have the next gene sequencing
Speaker 4: to be able to pass it on to kill more females,
Speaker 4: and so it takes time, like they have to continuously reproduce,
Speaker 4: they have to be able to like, it takes a
Speaker 4: lot of time to be able to go through it
Speaker 4: and switch the genes back and forth, Like it's not
Speaker 4: a fast process. Instead of just going in and wiping
Speaker 4: them out, they're actually trying to change all the gene
Speaker 4: sequencing that is left in what's like what's actually left.
Speaker 4: Then it'll just be the males and then they'll die out.
Speaker 4: So but then what happens to everything else that's involved
Speaker 4: in that?
Speaker 2: So, Yeah, I was just reading on like would it
Speaker 2: be detrimental to nature in general? If if mosquitoes were
Speaker 2: just gone one day there was no more, no more mosquitos,
Speaker 2: and there was one like little comparison that somebody made.
Speaker 3: It's like, yeah, like you.
Speaker 2: Know, the the the creatures that feed on mosquitoes.
Speaker 3: You know, that's just one thing that they eat.
Speaker 2: It's almost like if if you if there was somebody
Speaker 2: that just wiped away all of the rice in the world, Like,
Speaker 2: we would still find other shit to eat, but it
Speaker 2: would take away a lot of food for a lot
Speaker 2: of people. So I guess it would be somewhat detrimental
Speaker 2: to those to the you know, the frogs and the
Speaker 2: birds and everything that eats and lizards and all.
Speaker 5: That shit that that that eats.
Speaker 3: The mosquitoes. Yeah, but basically it would be like it
Speaker 3: would be for us more than anything else. It would
Speaker 3: be for humanity.
Speaker 2: And it's you know, it's it's because I believe that
Speaker 2: they're not exactly the mosquitoes aren't exactly detrimental to the
Speaker 2: animal kingdom, Like it's mainly us, isn't it.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean they bite animals too, but you know,
Speaker 3: animals just deal with it the same way humans deal
Speaker 3: with mosquito bites. You smack them or you get bit
Speaker 3: and it just for a couple of days and you
Speaker 3: move on with your life. But now that's the a
Speaker 3: lime disease comes from that, but mostly ticks too, but
Speaker 3: either way it goes. Yeah, insects biting is not good
Speaker 3: for the bite excuse me. The bite or usually gets
Speaker 3: the upper hand on that one, and whoever got bit
Speaker 3: or whatever got bit usually suffers, but it's never to
Speaker 3: a scale to where we have to worry about it.
Speaker 3: But at the same time, dude, I would not be
Speaker 3: mad if the mosquito population on Earth was gone, and like, yeah,
Speaker 3: there'd be some very upset frogs and lizards, but like and.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the problem is, though, is once you take out
Speaker 4: so this is the main killer, Like, this is one
Speaker 4: of the main killers of humans, is the mosquitoes. So
Speaker 4: if you're taking that main source of killing away, because
Speaker 4: that's like realistically, only so much can only so many
Speaker 4: resources are currently being available for people. So what happens
Speaker 4: if you stop having this killer? Because like this is
Speaker 4: a trillion dollar business, like malaria vaccines, the malaria aid
Speaker 4: and like all their little stuff that they you know,
Speaker 4: the bedding and all that stuff. Like this is a
Speaker 4: consistent thing that causes people to get sick, causes people
Speaker 4: to cost money. Why would they cure cancer when they
Speaker 4: get why would they cure malaria, because like this is
Speaker 4: a thing like they they're wanting to do these things,
Speaker 4: but at what point a is it going to become
Speaker 4: a like, oh well, the now we're way too overpopulated.
Speaker 4: So is it going to be something else? Like is
Speaker 4: it going to be the monkey pox or is it
Speaker 4: going to be like a new virus that's going to
Speaker 4: cause the deaths instead of the malaria. Since you know,
Speaker 4: the transmitter, the birds is a great way to transmit.
Speaker 4: The insects are a great way back. Plague is still around.
Speaker 4: I know people don't want to believe it, but it's
Speaker 4: still around, still has cases, and the rodents is a
Speaker 4: great way to be able to transmit diseases. So I'm like,
Speaker 4: I have a hard timing like are they really going
Speaker 4: to eradicate this or is there going to be more
Speaker 4: fallout from them trying to eradicate the specific mosquitoes than
Speaker 4: letting them be so.
Speaker 3: And with all of that, we're talking about gene editing,
Speaker 3: gene splicing, gene mutations done in labs and things like this.
Speaker 3: I got this little article pulled up from gene Convene,
Speaker 3: which is a global collaborative virtual institute, and this has
Speaker 3: a really good timeline on how long we have been
Speaker 3: editing and modifying genes for the quote unquote betterment of humanity,
Speaker 3: and I thought it was interesting enough to be worth
Speaker 3: a little read here. The first observations of the skewed
Speaker 3: inherence patterns that are characteristic of what we now refer
Speaker 3: to as gene drive were made by a Russian researcher.
Speaker 3: The year was nineteen twenty eight and he was studying
Speaker 3: the species of Drosophilia, which is a fruitfly. The first
Speaker 3: half the twenty century saw the discovery of jumping genes.
Speaker 3: These are now referred to as trans transposable elements. They
Speaker 3: are common, abundant, and very well diverse, A very diverse
Speaker 3: group of gene drives. They achieved drive by creating copies
Speaker 3: of themselves and inserting them randomly into chromosomes. In the
Speaker 3: late nineteen fifties, a type of gene drive known as
Speaker 3: meioic myotic drive meiotic I have no idea sure was discovered.
Speaker 3: Scientists quickly realized that the meiotic drive might be used
Speaker 3: to control insect pests. While notable and important research in
Speaker 3: the early twenty first century is frequently frequently cited as
Speaker 3: foundational to the history of gene drive. The timeline presented
Speaker 3: here illustrates that important ideas originated long before. Only in
Speaker 3: the twenty first century have the technical capabilities been available
Speaker 3: to readily create quote unquote gene drives in the laboratory. Okay,
Speaker 3: so let's just go over a couple of these key
Speaker 3: things that happened on this timeline here. Nineteen one hundred
Speaker 3: to nineteen fifty Early observations. Barbara McClintock. Yeah, she discovered
Speaker 3: transposable elements, a class of selfish genetic elements. Then we
Speaker 3: jumped to nineteen nineteen fifty and nineteen seventy five Basic
Speaker 3: Genetics and Applications. This was spearheaded by Edward F. Nipling
Speaker 3: or Kipling, I'm not just one hundred percent sure. He
Speaker 3: explored genetic control of insect, vectors of human pathology and parasites. Okay.
Speaker 3: Then nineteen seventy five to two thousand Molecular genetic and
Speaker 3: transgenic Technologies spearheaded by Christopher Curtis, he explored genetic controls
Speaker 3: of insect vectors of human pathology and parasites as well.
Speaker 3: And then two thousand, Oh, I'm sorry I missed one
Speaker 3: down here, Uh, oh, it breaks each one down. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Two thousand to today, gene editing technologies. The name Austin
Speaker 3: Bert might come up to some people.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 3: He first proposed the use of homing in homing indo
Speaker 3: nucleuses as gene drive platforms.
Speaker 4: The gene drive is really interesting. You can actually google
Speaker 4: this to further break it down and like understand like
Speaker 4: the basic level of like what you're actually like looking at.
Speaker 4: So basically what it does is it takes a gene
Speaker 4: and it replaces in the chromosome itself. It takes out
Speaker 4: sequencing and it replaces it with other stuff. And so
Speaker 4: just like I was saying earlier, when it breeds with
Speaker 4: the next pair, then they have like you know, and
Speaker 4: there's a good video on it that drops down and
Speaker 4: actually shows you. So you'll have like the adults, then
Speaker 4: you'll have the parents, and it'll show you that you
Speaker 4: have the gene sequencing change in fifty percent roughly of
Speaker 4: those babies, and then like it continuously comes down. It's
Speaker 4: a very long process, but it's a way to be
Speaker 4: able to manipulate the genes and change how these bugs
Speaker 4: actually are and what they do can they transmit? So
Speaker 4: the big thing about this is is they're trying to
Speaker 4: get it to where they no longer can actually carry
Speaker 4: malaria like at all. They can change the genomes to
Speaker 4: they can't carry that at all, or the other viruses
Speaker 4: they that most of the time. In fact, humans with
Speaker 4: it just is going to take a very long time
Speaker 4: to get all of the mosquitoes. But this technology has
Speaker 4: been around and in the works since the nineteen hundreds.
Speaker 5: So you remember, I just recently was telling you about
Speaker 5: the love bug, Jonathan.
Speaker 3: Yes, even though they don't like to accept that that
Speaker 3: was something that was created that wasn't created, right, I'm crazy,
Speaker 3: except we have been doing gene splicing and cloning and
Speaker 3: all these things in the insect community since oh, you know,
Speaker 3: nineteen twenty eight. But yeah, we're just crazy conspiracy theorist
Speaker 3: over here. There's no shred of evidence to back any
Speaker 3: of those claims. Right. But with all that being said,
Speaker 3: before we jump into the impos Jonathan, where are you
Speaker 3: thinking that this is all headed? Where are you at
Speaker 3: with what the information we've given you? What will you
Speaker 3: think of bro.
Speaker 2: To be honest, I think that all of these it's
Speaker 2: gonna sound crazy, but that's what we talk about over here.
Speaker 2: I think that technically what's going to happen is that
Speaker 2: all of these vaccine creators and the people that are
Speaker 2: that are working in in creating these diseases and making
Speaker 2: them more severe and everything like that, I think just
Speaker 2: going to go to the highest bidder and whatever is
Speaker 2: going to happen. So whether it's monkey pox or some
Speaker 2: kind of malaria or name your other disease.
Speaker 3: X like, there's only that.
Speaker 2: I think that personally, there's probably only going to be
Speaker 2: one that is released at a time, and probably the
Speaker 2: most harmful, the most detrimental to humanity, And in that.
Speaker 5: I think that that's gonna be the one that's going
Speaker 5: to be released.
Speaker 2: I think that it's probably it's probably being seen like that.
Speaker 3: And I like that they keep mentioning COVID. I really
Speaker 3: actually do like it because that's like the big red
Speaker 3: flag for us. That's the big telltale sign that they're
Speaker 3: going to do a rinse and repeat of what happened before.
Speaker 3: See we've said this before on this show so many times.
Speaker 3: COVID was an excellent case study. Okay, yes, some people
Speaker 3: did in fact die from it, but these people usually
Speaker 3: were overweight or had respiratory problems. Beforehand, they had comorbidities
Speaker 3: before they ever had the introduction of COVID into their system. Right,
Speaker 3: But the way the public responded, not to laws, not
Speaker 3: to rules that if you don't follow this, you're going
Speaker 3: to jail for the safety of everyone else. It was
Speaker 3: just mandates. It was just things that they suggested very
Speaker 3: heavily and may threaten your job, but then couldn't actually
Speaker 3: fire you over it. But then certain people did get
Speaker 3: it was messy. It was a very very big clusterfuck.
Speaker 3: Now that they are talking about all of these new
Speaker 3: things that might come out and they keep using the
Speaker 3: COVID uh situation. I'm not even gonna call it a pandemic.
Speaker 3: I'll say plandemic. They're using that as a blueprint, if
Speaker 3: you will, for how they're going to proceed. I think
Speaker 3: it's fascinating and terrifying. Yeah. No, I mean that they're
Speaker 3: going to make their money however they can.
Speaker 2: And I think that they absolutely used COVID as kind
Speaker 2: of a like a blueprint precursor to what the eventual
Speaker 2: thing is going to be. And I think that we
Speaker 2: would be absolutely crazy to think that it's not going
Speaker 2: to happen sometime between now and four years from now
Speaker 2: if you catch my grip in my drift.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, one hundred percent. So all right, do you
Speaker 3: have anything you wanted to add on this before we
Speaker 3: jump onto the impox No, we.
Speaker 4: Still got sorry, no, we still got like we got
Speaker 4: the best one for last.
Speaker 3: So fair enough. All right, Now let's go into the
Speaker 3: next item on the agenda, which is the impox case
Speaker 3: from China. I know, who could have ever foreseen China
Speaker 3: coming out with the new virus. We might need to
Speaker 3: get added to the Bingo card as a matter of fact, totally,
Speaker 3: but here we go. Here Chinese health authorities have reported
Speaker 3: a new mutated strain of IMPOCS clad onebe virus in
Speaker 3: China today, know all about this new strain. Here we go,
Speaker 3: oh Jesus. In a recent development related to impos case,
Speaker 3: the Chinese health authorities reported a new mutated strain of
Speaker 3: IMPOCS clayed onebe virus in China. This is following a
Speaker 3: surge in impox cases in African countries and many non
Speaker 3: African nations like India, UK, USA, and many Asian and
Speaker 3: European nations. Last year, the World Health Organization declared a
Speaker 3: global public health emergency as a precautionary measure to deal
Speaker 3: with the outbreak. According to China Center for Disease Control
Speaker 3: and Prevention, the new variant that they have detected in
Speaker 3: China is a cluster outbreak and started with the infection
Speaker 3: of a foreigner who has a history of travel and
Speaker 3: residents in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Four additional
Speaker 3: cases have been reported in individuals who were infected after
Speaker 3: having close contact with the foreign individual, kind of a
Speaker 3: patient zero situation. The symptoms in these case patients are mild,
Speaker 3: consisting of skin rash and blisters. The impox transmission, however,
Speaker 3: is through close contact and results in flu like symptoms
Speaker 3: and pus filled lesions on the body. While it is
Speaker 3: typically mild, it can be fatal in rare instances. In August,
Speaker 3: the World Health Organization has declared impocs a public health
Speaker 3: emergency after the outbreak in Africa had gone out of control.
Speaker 3: This declaration was made for the second time in two years,
Speaker 3: following the case in the surge in the Democratic Republic
Speaker 3: of the Congo and many other non African nations. Now,
Speaker 3: the Chinese National Health Commission says in a statement to
Speaker 3: Reuters they would categorize impocs as a category B infectious disease.
Speaker 3: This categorization would enable officials to undertake emergency measures such
Speaker 3: as suspending work in school, restricting public gatherings, and seiling
Speaker 3: off areas during a potential outbreak of the disease. That
Speaker 3: also kind of sounds it sounds a little familiar. Doesn't know,
Speaker 3: we've seen this one before. I feel like coronavirus a
Speaker 3: little bit, dude, A little bit. Now, this is just
Speaker 3: a quick little article talking about the impocs, but we
Speaker 3: do have a little bit more about this from the
Speaker 3: CDC itself. Actually, Jonathan, if you want to read this one,
Speaker 3: you go for it, sir. The empos in the United
Speaker 3: States and around the world. The current situation. What to know.
Speaker 3: There are two types of the virus that cause empocs,
Speaker 3: Claye one and Clayed two. Both types spread the same
Speaker 3: way and can be prevented using these same methods. There
Speaker 3: have been cases or outbreaks of Clayed one empox in
Speaker 3: several countries in Central and Eastern Africa. There have also
Speaker 3: been several travelers ociated clade one empox cases reported in
Speaker 3: countries and other parts of Africa, Europe, Asia, and North America.
Speaker 3: CDC is working with public health partners in the United
Speaker 3: States and throughout and throughout Africa to monitor the for
Speaker 3: EMPOCS cases and increase surveillance capacity in addition to other activities.
Speaker 3: Clade two EMPOCS cases continue to spread at low levels
Speaker 3: in many countries around the world. Okay, so the CDC
Speaker 3: is obviously well aware of it, and they are trying
Speaker 3: to release statements about it. You know, let's go ahead
Speaker 3: and read what they say. The current situation in the
Speaker 3: United States is this will be this will be fun.
Speaker 2: The first case of Claye one EMPOCS in the United
Speaker 2: States was detected in November of twenty twenty four, following
Speaker 2: the patient's travel to an affected area. No additional cases
Speaker 2: were reported. The CDC assessed the risk to the United
Speaker 2: States overall population and specific populations within the United States
Speaker 2: posed by the Claye one EMPOCS out as low. Clayed
Speaker 2: two EMPOS is still circulating at low levels and children
Speaker 2: have historically gotten empocs and endemic areas in Western and
Speaker 2: Central Africa, and in this outbreak, the high number of
Speaker 2: children with EMPOS reported and likely reported in likely reflects
Speaker 2: spread within households. Based on what we know right now,
Speaker 2: we don't expect to see the same sort of risk
Speaker 2: and children if empocs were introduced in the United States
Speaker 2: for reasons including different households, different household makeup and size,
Speaker 2: access to disinfecting products, and improved access to medical care.
Speaker 3: So they're saying basically that if it was to spread
Speaker 3: in America, it would be kind of risky, but still
Speaker 3: kind of containable and seen as a low risk situation.
Speaker 3: But again, this is off of the assumption that it
Speaker 3: would not mutate to a further and stronger and more
Speaker 3: dangerous strain, which all of these seem to just be
Speaker 3: mutating like motherfuckers. So I'm not really taking and that
Speaker 3: is as an air of confidence in what the CDC
Speaker 3: is saying, but we can in fact read on to
Speaker 3: see across the globe. I'm sorry, goohe.
Speaker 4: Oh no, I just was scanning and this subclade one
Speaker 4: bee is the same one in China from the guy
Speaker 4: from the Dominican Republic, and this is the same the
Speaker 4: Congo is the same place as the other one. But
Speaker 4: it's saying that it's spread through intimate contact and adult
Speaker 4: sexual contact between two different demographics, including heterosexual spread with
Speaker 4: sex trade workers. So it's already spread to China, this
Speaker 4: one bee, so they have like those confirmed cases or whatnot.
Speaker 3: And that makes sense because China's got a lot of
Speaker 3: people working in Africa right now. Ever since the oil
Speaker 3: industry ended or pretty much shut down America in twenty
Speaker 3: sixteen and all the oil field workers from Africa came home,
Speaker 3: China came in and bought up all of their drilling rigs,
Speaker 3: all of their wells for pennies on the dollar. And
Speaker 3: China has been making some very strategic moves in the
Speaker 3: financial and industry field around the world. So isn't it
Speaker 3: fascinating that China in the Congo, which for the record,
Speaker 3: the guy that I refer to a lot that was
Speaker 3: working in the Congo with Chevron when he left and
Speaker 3: the Chinese workers came in there. Isn't it fascinating that
Speaker 3: the Congo and China are seeing these one hundred percent believe.
Speaker 4: This, It says the ongoing global outbreak of CLAD two.
Speaker 4: So this isn't the one bee. This is the first
Speaker 4: one caused more than one hundred thousand cases in one
Speaker 4: hundred and twenty two countries, including one hundred and fifteen
Speaker 4: countries where IMPOS has not previously been reported, and it
Speaker 4: gives you like more of a more breakdown of like
Speaker 4: where countries were and you know which ones were you know,
Speaker 4: infected and stuff. But this subclad one B is the
Speaker 4: news strand yeah, so so.
Speaker 3: You know what, let's actually look at this here. Countries
Speaker 3: experiencing local human to human transmission of clade one impox
Speaker 3: include Burundi, Central Africa, the Central African republican excuse me,
Speaker 3: that's a new one, uh, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya,
Speaker 3: Republic of the Congo. So not just the Democratic Republic
Speaker 3: of the Congo, but also the Republic of the Congo. Yes,
Speaker 3: those are two separate nations depending on the year, depends
Speaker 3: on which country you're talking about with that continent, let's
Speaker 3: see Kenya, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda. Countries
Speaker 3: reporting travel associated cases of clay one include Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Oman, Pakistan, Sweden, Thailand,
Speaker 3: the United Kingdom of the United States, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
Speaker 3: So yeah one PC. If you know anybody who goes
Speaker 3: enter out of these countries, you might want to let
Speaker 3: them be aware that this is what they're walking into.
Speaker 16: Uh.
Speaker 3: Historically, only Cameroon in West Africa had cases of both
Speaker 3: Claye one and Claye two, as both clades are endemic,
Speaker 3: but in different parts of the country. So yeah, that's
Speaker 3: that's Bengo card. Shit have I ever seen? Actually, whoa
Speaker 3: look at this. We've got a whole we got a
Speaker 3: whole map of this going on here, hold on, im
Speaker 3: assumed in on accident. What the hell? Oh that's how
Speaker 3: you do it? Okay, So wow, let's see here confirmed
Speaker 3: impox cases since January first of twenty twenty four. Okay,
Speaker 3: So total of CLAYD one d Clay two, we got
Speaker 3: just under twenty four thousand cases in locations with only
Speaker 3: klayed one is a little over thirteen thousand. Cases with
Speaker 3: only Klay two is just over sixty seven hundred and
Speaker 3: case then locations with both Clayed one in Clay two
Speaker 3: is just over forty one hundred. But here we see
Speaker 3: on this map areas that are you know, more than
Speaker 3: or less than affected by this. That is a massive
Speaker 3: portion of the world that is seeing this uptick right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's all over the entire world pretty much. Just
Speaker 4: to add to the being a car, I wonder if
Speaker 4: it I wonder if you got this included and you
Speaker 4: got the bird flu like wood, it mute even more.
Speaker 4: I mean they all have the same kind of symptoms
Speaker 4: of like headaches and this and that, and like, hey,
Speaker 4: maybe maybe you could add it to your being a
Speaker 4: good card.
Speaker 2: We I almost I feel like it's doing a disservice
Speaker 2: whenever we call it empos can we.
Speaker 17: Just let's just it's like it's a box cooler first
Speaker 17: of all, Like, and wasn't there what movie was that
Speaker 17: where there was the uh, the the virally infected monkeys
Speaker 17: that were running around.
Speaker 3: Uh, I know the one you're talking about, because they
Speaker 3: locked down the entire city and then the military eight
Speaker 3: days later.
Speaker 4: That's a zombie movie.
Speaker 3: But they no, there was one where it was like
Speaker 3: a monkey that escaped from a zoo or something, and
Speaker 3: like it was sitting on a window sill of a house.
Speaker 3: Next thing you know, that house was ground zero for
Speaker 3: the human the human transmission they call it in the
Speaker 3: National Guard and basically biodomed this city and just had
Speaker 3: to slowly watch as every person had very long, horrible deaths.
Speaker 3: It was This movie came out early two thousands. Another
Speaker 3: one you're talking about, I got it right here. As
Speaker 3: a matter of a.
Speaker 5: Man, I it's got a commercial voice.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I got the the well, the the the part
Speaker 2: in which they mentioned the monkey virus. But it's one
Speaker 2: of my favorite movies of all time. What's the name
Speaker 2: of it, American Ultra that's the one.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, buddy, here it is tonight. Sorry, can I
Speaker 3: just ask about the monkeys and the gas masks?
Speaker 13: What you ain't heard?
Speaker 9: Towns, I'm the government.
Speaker 3: Wildfire out of spaces straight and Gomna strain back till
Speaker 3: disease touch ship. I'm sorry, I see look at the
Speaker 3: TV man, look at that ship right there.
Speaker 7: Around the town of Climate, West Virginia with the CDC
Speaker 7: has set a breakout of what is being described as
Speaker 7: super typhoid began earlier this evening. The bridge into town
Speaker 7: has been blocked, with access in or out up the
Speaker 7: town official personnel or believe that outbreak real. I can't
Speaker 7: be these two individuals, I can't be real. Anyone having
Speaker 7: knowledge of their whereabouts to contact the authorities immediately. These
Speaker 7: two animal access the high contagious not any circumstances. Officials
Speaker 7: have indicated that Victoria Lassiter is responsible for the obreak,
Speaker 7: right y'all? TV my monster's inappropriate close contact with several
Speaker 7: test monkeys.
Speaker 2: Okay, we don't have to watch. The whole thing's an
Speaker 2: American ultra.
Speaker 3: It was.
Speaker 2: It was a cover story that that there was this
Speaker 2: monkey virus that was going around, and the news put
Speaker 2: those two like, uh, the the FBI agend or whatever
Speaker 2: and the the one who was MK Ultrade as the
Speaker 2: guys who were quote unquote fucking monkeys.
Speaker 3: So ah, got you.
Speaker 15: Now.
Speaker 3: The movie I was talking about was actually called Outbreak.
Speaker 3: I just looked that one up too, So it was
Speaker 3: a it's that was kind of like a comedic look
Speaker 3: at it, and they were using it as a way
Speaker 3: to throw the people off the movie Outbreak is it's
Speaker 3: a it was a kapacin monkey or whatever that like
Speaker 3: escaped and apparently had some sort of disease that just
Speaker 3: wreck shop. But anyway, so again it's like they've already
Speaker 3: uh done soft launches on these things in the movies
Speaker 3: to just let people know that this is a real
Speaker 3: thing that could happen one day.
Speaker 4: Contagion is a really good movie to watch. Yeah, that
Speaker 4: starts out on Grand zero and like how they backtrack
Speaker 4: the virus all the way back and stuff and how
Speaker 4: and how it actually works. It's a really good movie
Speaker 4: to just kind of see what can happen quickly.
Speaker 3: So let's get back to it here. So what is
Speaker 3: the CDC doing? I mean, yeah, we really don't have
Speaker 3: to read this because what they're doing is probably they're
Speaker 3: gonna say the most that they can do and then
Speaker 3: at the end it won't be enough because man, we
Speaker 3: just couldn't control this thing. Who could ever control such
Speaker 3: a virus? And this and this? Now let's talk about cholera,
Speaker 3: because we now have some sort of a super cholera
Speaker 3: that has come out which is extremely preventable. We well,
Speaker 3: not this super but cholera itself. We have known what
Speaker 3: causes it, what spreads it, what it does, and all
Speaker 3: of the things about it for years. As a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, you remember a hocus Pocus, the first one,
Speaker 3: uh huh okay, You remember when they were trying to
Speaker 3: figure out what to curse Thackery Binks with. She even
Speaker 3: opened up her book and mentioned cholera. That movie was
Speaker 3: supposed to be set in the sixteen hundreds, Like they've
Speaker 3: known what colera was for hundreds of years. Yes, I
Speaker 3: know it was a movie. Where was a movie? But
Speaker 3: they knew what it was. They may not have had
Speaker 3: all the certain sciences and technologies to know the ins
Speaker 3: and outs of it, but it's not a new thing.
Speaker 3: By you mean, it's like tuberculosis. We've known what that
Speaker 3: has been for quite some time. Why is TV killing
Speaker 3: millions of people in this day and age.
Speaker 4: That's something we probably should have looked up, but I didn't.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean I remember even talking about it when
Speaker 3: uh Me and Jonathan first combined forces to make this
Speaker 3: show what it was. We were talking about how COVID
Speaker 3: has killed this many people. It's like it also killed
Speaker 3: three million people last year with tuberculosis. Like it's substantially
Speaker 3: larger numbers of people die from TB the year that
Speaker 3: COVID hit the world. But somehow we didn't see a
Speaker 3: single outrage towards the TP pandemic, this pandemic of tuberculosi.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, I would much rather die of COVID
Speaker 2: than fucking tuberculosis Like that is a horrible way to go.
Speaker 3: Dude, agreed, But again, we have science about tuberculosis. We
Speaker 3: know what we can do, there's treatment options, and somehow
Speaker 3: we still have millions of people dying from it every year.
Speaker 3: Now we have a global task force that is coming
Speaker 3: together to talk about what they can do to stop
Speaker 3: the cholera outbreak. Like I'm this is this is crazy
Speaker 3: and this is from June of last year in France
Speaker 3: they wrote this article. But I mean, look at this.
Speaker 3: We have thirteen con tries right now that are all
Speaker 3: feeling the effects of this. It doesn't even make sense.
Speaker 3: I'm not you know what, Let's go ahead. The seventh
Speaker 3: Cholera pandemic has continued to intensify since twenty twenty one,
Speaker 3: with an increasing number of outbreaks reported in vulnerable settings,
Speaker 3: but also in areas that have not reported cases in
Speaker 3: decades or ever. Over six hundred and twenty thousand cases
Speaker 3: have been reported in twenty nine countries between June twenty
Speaker 3: twenty three and May twenty twenty four in twenty nine countries,
Speaker 3: concerning data that must be understood as an underrepresentation of
Speaker 3: the reality due to surveillance challenges. Due to surveillance challenges Okay,
Speaker 3: sixteen countries currently have case fatality rates above one percent,
Speaker 3: reflecting unacceptable levels of deaths. These negative trends are accelerated
Speaker 3: by access constraints to hard to reach areas, security climate,
Speaker 3: socioeconomic and political challenges and are compounded by major operational challenges.
Speaker 3: These include limited funding or coordination and response activities, supply
Speaker 3: chain disruptions affecting laboratory and case management work, and despite
Speaker 3: recent programs, the production of oral cholera vaccines remains insufficient
Speaker 3: to cover reactive needs, and no preventative campaign has been
Speaker 3: carried out since twenty twenty two. Yeah, that's that's the
Speaker 3: going trend as of right now.
Speaker 4: And this made the list. This made the list of
Speaker 4: the top like eleven that they are watching, like the
Speaker 4: super Watch is on like of becoming a serious pandemic
Speaker 4: or like an actual pandemic of cholera. So yeah, they haven't.
Speaker 4: They aren't doing anything about it. They aren't I guess
Speaker 4: helping people figure out how not to spread cholera. I'm
Speaker 4: not really sure.
Speaker 3: Well, there's probably not a lot of money to be
Speaker 3: made because it's main happening like within poorer countries, isn't it.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: There's probably something to do with that, Like if they
Speaker 2: can't get any kind of government contract to be able
Speaker 2: to siphon money, you know, tax money or whatever from
Speaker 2: the government, which would ultimately be taking it from the
Speaker 2: rest of their people. There's probably not a whole lot
Speaker 2: of money to be made off of it. That's why
Speaker 2: it's like, I think that most of these, most of
Speaker 2: these diseases that are naturally happening in quotations, I think
Speaker 2: that a lot of them are going to be hitting
Speaker 2: the Western world, probably more than anywhere else because there's
Speaker 2: more money to be made there.
Speaker 5: That's just my own personal I mean.
Speaker 4: I would I wouldn't doubt it. I actually looked up
Speaker 4: the tuberculosis since you mentioned it, and I was like, yeah,
Speaker 4: it's like eight point two million people were diagnosed with
Speaker 4: TB in twenty twenty three. In twenty twenty two it
Speaker 4: was seven point five And the highlights is is that
Speaker 4: the number has gone down, but it's still significantly rising
Speaker 4: to ten point eight million at the end of twenty
Speaker 4: twenty three, So it's still rising. They're still like having infections,
Speaker 4: Like it's an actual issue in funding funding gaps and
Speaker 4: challenges globally, and it's saying that this is actually like
Speaker 4: one of the top killers besides malaria, which is also
Speaker 4: rising as well in HIV.
Speaker 3: So I have an article pulled up here and we're
Speaker 3: we're not going to read the whole article. I did,
Speaker 3: in fact find this map because this was updated December
Speaker 3: of last year, so we are less than a month
Speaker 3: away from when this was published and updated. And if
Speaker 3: you notice the countries that are going to be affected
Speaker 3: or are currently affected by the cholera endemic, Okay, we're
Speaker 3: seeing a couple of them in specific that you probably
Speaker 3: could have seen coming right, A lot of southern and
Speaker 3: Eastern African countries.
Speaker 5: India is getting smacked with it, and China.
Speaker 3: Of course, China is going to let their people catch
Speaker 3: every single thing that comes out because they really want
Speaker 3: to reduce their population. That's the whole Thing's ueshipping has
Speaker 3: been on for forever. But yeah, mostly in Africa and
Speaker 3: in Southeast Asia, that this cholera epidemic is really growing,
Speaker 3: just like COVID apparently just started in one of the
Speaker 3: Asian countries and then just spread like gangbusters, just.
Speaker 4: Like every one of them that we've seen pretty much today.
Speaker 3: Funny how it just kind of stems from the same
Speaker 3: spawn point.
Speaker 2: I mean, but is it all spawning from China or
Speaker 2: is that just is it kind of like h is
Speaker 2: that where like a lot of these diseases are really
Speaker 2: being worked on you know, like, are they are there
Speaker 2: multiple countries that are going over into China and everybody
Speaker 2: is collectively working on it, or is it mainly the
Speaker 2: Chinese that are constructing these diseases in order to wipe
Speaker 2: out people?
Speaker 5: Like, what are your thoughts on that?
Speaker 3: Well, as far as cholera is concerned, this first sentence
Speaker 3: kind of lays it out here. Safe drinking water and
Speaker 3: advanced sanitation systems have made Europe and North America collar
Speaker 3: are free for decades. However, the disease continues to spread
Speaker 3: through many countries and was reported for forty four countries
Speaker 3: across the globe in twenty twenty two. So again we're
Speaker 3: not going to read the whole thing here, but basically,
Speaker 3: if you look at this map, these are countries that
Speaker 3: do not have access to clean drinking water, decent medical care,
Speaker 3: any kind of real sanitation. These are the same people
Speaker 3: that will be drinking out of the same river that
Speaker 3: they shit in, and like that's not even seen as weird.
Speaker 4: So you know, well a lot of these countries too, though,
Speaker 4: some of these countries that are being affected, they have
Speaker 4: these are where all of the stuff is being made
Speaker 4: at and so the pollution is so high in their
Speaker 4: rivers already. Yeah, I don't think that it is just
Speaker 4: the Chinese government, because the Congo seems to be getting
Speaker 4: slammed with some shit right now. And they're not the
Speaker 4: only ones that are producing these kind of you know,
Speaker 4: scary viruses like our CDC in Georgia, it has one
Speaker 4: of the largest vaults of all of the like the
Speaker 4: plagues that you don't want, we have it here sitting
Speaker 4: on our soil. I mean in South America, they got
Speaker 4: hit with a black plague just like a few years ago,
Speaker 4: and nobody really talked about it. They had an increase
Speaker 4: actually at that jail that's that really psycho jail that
Speaker 4: has like all those people that live down there. I
Speaker 4: forget what it's called. They didn't they did a Netflix
Speaker 4: special on it, but they actually got hit with the
Speaker 4: black plague, and like they're still around, like they're not.
Speaker 4: China's not the only people that are doing experiments now.
Speaker 4: A lot of the experiments are done over there because
Speaker 4: they don't have the same regulations and a lot of
Speaker 4: companies can do skirt around different things. But like Germany
Speaker 4: does them, Finland has like the has the vaults as well.
Speaker 4: Like there's a lot of different places that harbor all
Speaker 4: of those diseases. Actually war war ze, you know, when
Speaker 4: they went over there, that's that's actually a real place.
Speaker 4: You can look it up and like that's they have
Speaker 4: all of those things that you don't want released in
Speaker 4: a special little bunker. And so there's multiple places. So
Speaker 4: it's not just them. It's the living conditions of these people.
Speaker 4: It's not being able to access you know, good healthcare
Speaker 4: and actually like any kind of virual medication or anything
Speaker 4: like that. But the problem is is it seems to
Speaker 4: be stemming from a lot of I don't know if
Speaker 4: it's like the education of how to prepare food or
Speaker 4: you know, it's a combination. It's a multifaceted issue. But
Speaker 4: these countries are getting slammed, and then the people are
Speaker 4: traveling in between and carrying it with them a lot
Speaker 4: of these viruses to other countries, and it's just continuously
Speaker 4: the cycle of more and more shit.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I could see like a lack of
Speaker 3: education from the local population, especially countries that do not
Speaker 3: have infrastructure to really get the word out to all
Speaker 3: corners of their land that hey, y'all, we got this
Speaker 3: problem going on. We need to like insta get a
Speaker 3: boil band or we need to make sure that you
Speaker 3: do X, y or Z thing, Like a lot of
Speaker 3: these places don't really have that, or they have it,
Speaker 3: but not to the scale right Like India, for instance,
Speaker 3: it is considered a first world country by some, but
Speaker 3: there is so many sections of the country that are
Speaker 3: like off into the beat like off the beaten path.
Speaker 3: You're never going to see them. No white person has
Speaker 3: been there in like sixty years kind of thing. It's
Speaker 3: it's it's wild shit where they're They're so far out,
Speaker 3: it's hard to get the word to everyone.
Speaker 5: And I can understand that too.
Speaker 3: But these are also, like they said, cultural and socioeconomic issues.
Speaker 3: The water being as polluted as it is, so even
Speaker 3: if you were to wash your hands with what you
Speaker 3: think is clean water, that water has been ran through
Speaker 3: how many different engine coolants and everything else, so you're
Speaker 3: just cooking with poison.
Speaker 4: There's actually a really fascinating I'm big about water and
Speaker 4: like the India has the worst water in the world.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, and the Green New Deal bullshit that they
Speaker 3: pulled us out of because you know, America is polluting
Speaker 3: the earth so bad. China and India are the number
Speaker 3: one and number two pollutants on Earth. Nobody's given them
Speaker 3: shit about how and why they're hurting the earth. Everybody
Speaker 3: just lets them do what they do.
Speaker 11: Well.
Speaker 4: There's been a lot of actual back life like attacking
Speaker 4: like apple for example there. Their plant there dumps a
Speaker 4: ton of chemicals into the already chemical like the river
Speaker 4: is dying. All the rivers are dying over there, and
Speaker 4: they've been working. The locals have been fighting tooth and
Speaker 4: nail for decades to try to make it better, but
Speaker 4: they keep getting stopped at every turn. There is a
Speaker 4: lot of information about like what's going on with their
Speaker 4: water supply. And I do feel, truly to my soul
Speaker 4: horrible for so many of those people because they have
Speaker 4: gone and try to do as much as they could
Speaker 4: to show the government and show them, hey, we're dying
Speaker 4: because you're killing us, and like please stop doing this.
Speaker 4: Like they boil the waters, They do all sorts of
Speaker 4: stuff to try to even be better, and it doesn't
Speaker 4: help because the chemicals are so heavy and it's leached
Speaker 4: into everything. So they I will say that they're in
Speaker 4: a very big disadvantage. Just like with the malaria cases,
Speaker 4: you have so many people that are living crampat and
Speaker 4: they try everything to keep using the net. They're doing
Speaker 4: all the things that they're supposed to do. They try
Speaker 4: over and over again whatever they're given, but they are
Speaker 4: such poverty that they cannot get out of it and
Speaker 4: they cannot survive, and they don't have enough access to
Speaker 4: medical care or any kind of vaccines or anything that
Speaker 4: could actually help them. They get given these, you know,
Speaker 4: the mosquito nets. They get graciously given and then they
Speaker 4: have to use them for ten kids because they're trying
Speaker 4: to cram them all together to keep them safe, and
Speaker 4: it's it's just not being effective.
Speaker 3: Or the dad just takes it and uses that as
Speaker 3: a fishing net, which is also something that has been
Speaker 3: done on mass to where like they didn't realize those
Speaker 3: nets weren't just nets. They were coded with certain chemicals
Speaker 3: to help prevent the mosquitoes. But fuck that, we're just
Speaker 3: gonna use them for fishing nets because.
Speaker 4: That's but they're starving, that's the problem. They're literally starving,
Speaker 4: and they have like the I did a thing about
Speaker 4: like these locations where like they're living on top of
Speaker 4: the water because they have nowhere to live, and they're
Speaker 4: sleeping on planks on top of the water, like hanging
Speaker 4: over because they have nothing and they're trying their to
Speaker 4: at least feed. But you also that that plays in
Speaker 4: with having no birth control methods because they have no
Speaker 4: access to birth control methods and they actually don't have
Speaker 4: a lot of education when it comes to that as well,
Speaker 4: Like you would think.
Speaker 3: They don't know where babies come from.
Speaker 4: They understand, but they don't like they don't quite understand
Speaker 4: the like some places don't quite have the technology or
Speaker 4: like the information to say that it's like okay, well, hey,
Speaker 4: right after you have a baby, you can get pregnant again,
Speaker 4: Like that's a common thing that they didn't know, like
Speaker 4: in certain locations.
Speaker 3: I feel like it would only take them one or
Speaker 3: two tries to get that message. But I mean fuck,
Speaker 3: I mean.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but they also believe in having more kids. So yeah,
Speaker 4: you know, it just depends because this is a cultural
Speaker 4: thing as well as a you know, education issue as
Speaker 4: well as having access and funding to this kind of issue.
Speaker 4: And rape is huge over it. Yeah, so that's not
Speaker 4: even like you're talking like a thirteen year old. You know,
Speaker 4: twelve year old could already have two kids depending on
Speaker 4: when her period is, and it has nothing to do
Speaker 4: with her wanting these children. This is being forced upon her, So.
Speaker 3: One hundred percent it's more than just one issue. It's
Speaker 3: like a cataclysmic chain of events that has led to
Speaker 3: it being the problem that it is, for sure, I
Speaker 3: mean anyway, all right, so I'm not going to read
Speaker 3: all of this. We'll read some of the keynotes here.
Speaker 3: Key measures identified in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty
Speaker 3: five to try to maintain this cholera situation, the scaling
Speaker 3: up of country support. There are twelve countries that are
Speaker 3: developing or planning to start the elaboration of their national
Speaker 3: cholera plans. Of those same twelve countries are also planning
Speaker 3: or already in the process of identifying their pamis, which
Speaker 3: I don't exactly know what that is off the top,
Speaker 3: I probably said so in the article. But you've got
Speaker 3: a lot of things to cover on this one. Acute
Speaker 3: funding constraints for partners mean the GTFCC must increase its
Speaker 3: capacities to engage in humanitarian and development forums. The completion
Speaker 3: of the Roadmap Midterm Review as instructed by the GTFCC
Speaker 3: Steering Committee. The review of the Roadmap M and E
Speaker 3: plan for Secretariat Secretary. Yeah, and expanding advocacy Task Team activities.
Speaker 3: So again they are trying their best to get something
Speaker 3: in the works to make it better. But as of
Speaker 3: now it's slow moving and cholera very well. Maybe the
Speaker 3: next quote unquote pandemic slash plandemic that takes out certain
Speaker 3: areas of the world. Now, I don't necessarily believe that
Speaker 3: that's going to make its way to America and be
Speaker 3: a real risk for all of us. I think that
Speaker 3: we may see a couple of cases, right, and then
Speaker 3: these might get blasted as a new thing. Maybe they'll
Speaker 3: be shown to be Hey, this was one case, but
Speaker 3: it's all good. But on the cult to conspiracy, we
Speaker 3: talk to people all around the globe, not just in America.
Speaker 3: So as we're looking at what the world can expect
Speaker 3: for twenty twenty five, do in fact have to mention
Speaker 3: that with that being said, ding gay fever is now
Speaker 3: making a massive resurgence. Jonathan, have you heard anything about this?
Speaker 3: Does it pronounced deng gay? M h huh uh No.
Speaker 3: I don't even know what the fuck it is.
Speaker 4: Is it ding gay?
Speaker 3: I've only ever heard it pronounced ding because it's from
Speaker 3: a French doctor but I I if it's pronounced ding gee, then.
Speaker 4: Like it probably is ding gay and I'm probably one
Speaker 4: hundred pc wrong.
Speaker 5: I could be either way. It's d e n g
Speaker 5: u e.
Speaker 2: However the fuck you say that word? But yeah, I've
Speaker 2: never really even heard of it.
Speaker 3: So it typically was seen as an African disease. You
Speaker 3: would go there, if you went like on a safari
Speaker 3: or if you want on a missions trip or something
Speaker 3: like that, you would need to worry about catching ding
Speaker 3: gay fever from the flies and the mosquitoes. And that
Speaker 3: was pretty much what it would. Matter of fact, George
Speaker 3: of the Jungle, you remember that. And whenever she was
Speaker 3: in the car back home, she was talking to her
Speaker 3: mom and she's like, are you sure you don't have
Speaker 3: ding gay fever? No, Mom, I do not have dan
Speaker 3: gay fever. What colors you're tongue? And she opened pink
Speaker 3: and then that that was when George had his head
Speaker 3: out the window and started screaming his his his war
Speaker 3: cry in the middle of New York City. So it's
Speaker 3: been a thing where if you go to Africa, you're
Speaker 3: gonna need to worry about malaria, You're gonna need to
Speaker 3: worry about ding gay fever, you're gonna need to worry about.
Speaker 3: This was one of those things, but it was never
Speaker 3: really thought about in the public zeitgeist outside of that, right, But.
Speaker 2: Now Brendan Frasier just shout him making his comeback.
Speaker 4: First of all, he was just the sexiest in in
Speaker 4: later years. I'm in later years, I mean earlier years,
Speaker 4: you mean like the moment, like yeah, yeah, before that too, Like,
Speaker 4: oh my god, him him is Tarzian and Sino Man.
Speaker 4: I watched him man way way too much as a
Speaker 4: as a young child.
Speaker 3: I just he was great and he was gorgeous. Hollywood
Speaker 3: turned their backs on him, and then the internet bullied
Speaker 3: Hollywood into giving him a second shot, and your boy
Speaker 3: has not missed yet. He's doing great. What was the
Speaker 3: name of that the one where he was singer? Is
Speaker 3: it Hairhead? Something like hair Heads?
Speaker 5: Yeah, him and Adam Sandler.
Speaker 4: And uh with his long hair.
Speaker 5: Crazy eyes was in there too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh my god, I forgot about that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, dude, I like the.
Speaker 4: One where they hit under the ground for all that
Speaker 4: time there his parents built a bunker underneath the ground, yes, yeah,
Speaker 4: and he like grew up down there all by himself,
Speaker 4: and then he went up to the surface and was like,
Speaker 4: what the fuck people are alive?
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that one guy that owned the bar like
Speaker 3: thought it was God that was coming talking to him,
Speaker 3: and they shrine a whole religion. Yea, he had a
Speaker 3: following and shit, yes, oh man, that's amazing. And then
Speaker 3: he had just like howked all of his dad's old
Speaker 3: baseball cards and like come to find out they were
Speaker 3: worth like gazillions of dollars now, so it was like, yeah,
Speaker 3: we got money. Sure, yeah.
Speaker 4: Well she was also really good looking to back then.
Speaker 3: That's true anyway. So the forecast of dingay fever cases
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty five what experts say. In twenty twenty four,
Speaker 3: an exceptional number of dingay cases was reported worldwide. In Brazil.
Speaker 3: According to the Ministry of Health, the disease affected more
Speaker 3: than six point five million people by mid November, with
Speaker 3: over fifty seven hundred confirmed deaths. It was a year
Speaker 3: in which dingay spread to southern regions and higher altitudes
Speaker 3: areas previously unaffected or rarely experiencing outbreaks. Experts from Oswaldo
Speaker 3: Cruz Foundation Fio Cruise, which is where this article comes from,
Speaker 3: Universidad del Val I'm gonna butcher those pronunciations. So let's
Speaker 3: just say it was like universities and these things. And
Speaker 3: the Ministry of Health of Brazil gathered on October thirty
Speaker 3: first in a webinar to discuss the upcoming twenty twenty
Speaker 3: five ding gay season using statistical predictive models. The event
Speaker 3: was organized by the Vice President of EDJU of Education,
Speaker 3: Information and Communication. These people, I think it was a
Speaker 3: crossover between the Portuguese language and the English language, so
Speaker 3: excuse me, long story short. During the online seminar, they
Speaker 3: discussed the current dingay situation in Brazil and shared statistical
Speaker 3: models to predict what they would expect for in answering
Speaker 3: participants questions. The event had over twelve hundred registrations and
Speaker 3: more than six hundred attendees. So what the experts say
Speaker 3: about dingay in twenty twenty three. The experts explain that
Speaker 3: many uncertainties remain regarding the dingay in twenty twenty five
Speaker 3: given the atypical year experience in twenty twenty four, both
Speaker 3: climatically and epidemiologically. The models do not predict an outbreak
Speaker 3: of the same magnitude as twenty twenty four, but warnings
Speaker 3: remain for certain regions such as the south of the country,
Speaker 3: which may experience an even greater outbreak. The research from
Speaker 3: the bar yup and the event mediator Rachel Lowe explains
Speaker 3: that in June twenty twenty four, Info Dingay and Muscula
Speaker 3: mate Sure launched a Dingay forecast spear sprint focused on
Speaker 3: the twenty twenty five season. The initiative aim to standardize
Speaker 3: predictive model training to develop a joint task force for
Speaker 3: DINGE in Brazil. All right, so they're basically just repeating this.
Speaker 4: So yeah, do you know how that you know how
Speaker 4: it's spread? Tell us mosquitoes and guess what, it's our
Speaker 4: specific kind of mosquitos here in North America, the ones
Speaker 4: that they're trying to eradicate, is the only kind that's
Speaker 4: spreading this.
Speaker 3: Oh shit.
Speaker 4: So I was like, wait a minute, I thought they
Speaker 4: were really mainly here, But yeah, mosquitos are how they're
Speaker 4: actually spreading this the same the same group. So Brazil
Speaker 4: is the one. Brazil is where we did is where
Speaker 4: the company did its experiment in the tourist locations that
Speaker 4: had the ninety percent rate.
Speaker 3: Yep.
Speaker 4: So I'm curious to see why they had such an
Speaker 4: increase like I don't know if it's a conspiracy, but
Speaker 4: I'm just saying, why in these specific regions where those
Speaker 4: pockets died apparently ninety percent, if this was spreading to
Speaker 4: unlike unaffected areas that they've never experienced an outbreak before, well,
Speaker 4: would it weager that those mosquitos that were still living
Speaker 4: moved out of those areas because they were dying because
Speaker 4: of the the fake the bioengineered mosquitos, or like does
Speaker 4: it have a connection to each other? Like how how
Speaker 4: is it that we did the experiment in Brazil and
Speaker 4: now Brazil had the most cases of deaths.
Speaker 5: Like, I'm just that's a very good point, Jonathan.
Speaker 2: Your thoughts, Well, I was just looking at just like
Speaker 2: where do mosquitoes even come from? Like, because you ever
Speaker 2: noticed that out of nowhere, like in your house, right
Speaker 2: Like whenever you have like you'll you'll get like fruit
Speaker 2: flies just show up out of nowhere, and it's like, well,
Speaker 2: where the fuck did they come from? You know, and
Speaker 2: it's usually borne from the fruit, which is I find,
Speaker 2: you know, just weird how that whole life cycle even works.
Speaker 2: And then you look at mosquitos, and mosquitos are are
Speaker 2: from like still.
Speaker 3: Water and so that's where they they lay their larvae.
Speaker 3: But it's like, you know, like it, are they born
Speaker 3: from still water or do mosquitoes lay their eggs buy
Speaker 3: the still water? You know what I mean? Yeah, they
Speaker 3: lay their eggs in the still water. See, moving water
Speaker 3: they can't use. So, for instance, Louisiana, we have a
Speaker 3: lot of stagnant water.
Speaker 5: That's just the way it goes.
Speaker 3: So you're going to have insane amounts of mosquitoes, especially
Speaker 3: if we just had a really heavy rain, because now
Speaker 3: there's all these other little stagnant pools in the middle
Speaker 3: of anywhere where there wasn't one three weeks ago. So
Speaker 3: it just grows and grows and over populates. You don't
Speaker 3: have mosquitos in the mountains, you don't have mosquitos in
Speaker 3: the desert because A it's too cold, b there's no
Speaker 3: stagnant water. And see, they need a specific type of
Speaker 3: environment to reproduce at scale like this. So whenever they
Speaker 3: did that experiment in the Florida Keys, this makes sense
Speaker 3: to me. The way they did in Brazil, this makes
Speaker 3: sense to me, Right, I get it. If they were
Speaker 3: to do the same experiment in Louisiana, I could at
Speaker 3: least put the pieces together in my mind of why
Speaker 3: they would use this as some sort of a testing
Speaker 3: ground for mosquito mutations and things like that. However, I'm
Speaker 3: not really seeing much of a benefit to these experiments
Speaker 3: being done anywhere. They're claiming that there's benefits, but again
Speaker 3: they won't release the reports, so like, who really knows.
Speaker 4: So the tourist locations is where they released it, so
Speaker 4: like like the high altitude mosquitoes don't normally go to
Speaker 4: high altitude. So I'm just I'm just trying to think of,
Speaker 4: like I obviously I don't know the pattern of mosquitos.
Speaker 4: I don't have a degree in that at all, but
Speaker 4: it just wagers. I'm mean, just why would this happen
Speaker 4: where in this specific country that they released these mosquitos
Speaker 4: and had such a good progress in it. I'm just
Speaker 4: kind of trying to figure out, like maybe there's something
Speaker 4: leadd to it, maybe.
Speaker 3: There's not right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's what I was, you know, just pondering
Speaker 2: there for a second, because only reason I even thought
Speaker 2: about that is that so I have I have like
Speaker 2: this big fish tank, I have a two turtles in there,
Speaker 2: and so I feed it like these little turtle pellets
Speaker 2: every day, right, that's what it eats. And and if
Speaker 2: you give them too many of the little turtle pellets,
Speaker 2: then what happens is is that these tiny little critters
Speaker 2: are they they start to form. It's like they almost
Speaker 2: look like crustacean, but they're basically like little mites that
Speaker 2: are born from this from this food.
Speaker 3: And I thought, isn't that strange? How, you know, there
Speaker 3: was this.
Speaker 2: Dry food and it was almost it was just like
Speaker 2: the it was the right environment for basically these little
Speaker 2: these little mites to just pop up out of nowhere.
Speaker 2: And I feel like, I don't know if that was
Speaker 2: the same thing for mosquitoes.
Speaker 3: Or or whatever.
Speaker 2: I but yeah, of course, like the mosquitos, they lay
Speaker 2: eggs near that, you know. And that's why I was
Speaker 2: bringing up the whole fruit fly incident, because there wasn't
Speaker 2: like one fruit fly that showed up out of nowhere
Speaker 2: and impregnated you know, all by by your apples and
Speaker 2: your fruit and your bananas and everything. It's almost like
Speaker 2: they were all up out of the fruits, which I
Speaker 2: just I don't know, I find that that that's just
Speaker 2: so strange to me, how they just come up out
Speaker 2: of nowhere.
Speaker 3: You know you're one hundred percent correct, good cult members.
Speaker 3: Wash your fruit when you get it from the store,
Speaker 3: even if it's from a farmer's market, even if you
Speaker 3: grew it yourself. Wash that shit. I promise you you'll see
Speaker 3: things float to the surface that you're like, wait, that
Speaker 3: was about to go in my body.
Speaker 4: Yeah, those would be eggs, vinegar, vinegar, water. Yep, you
Speaker 4: soak your fruit in it will be great. I use
Speaker 4: Young Living the fruit and veggie spray. It's actually really
Speaker 4: healthy for like, it's not anything toxic on your stuff,
Speaker 4: and you can spray all your fruit and then soak
Speaker 4: it and then putting your fruit in uh Mason jars
Speaker 4: in the fridge can also help.
Speaker 3: Absolutely. So we got millions of people that are experiencing
Speaker 3: the side effects of dingay.
Speaker 5: In their air or dinghy or whatever the case may be.
Speaker 3: And uh yeah, so now let's go to this, uh,
Speaker 3: this biggin' the worst.
Speaker 4: One, the worst one on the Bingo car that like
Speaker 4: could end all life as.
Speaker 3: We know it literally, and that's not uh, I wish
Speaker 3: that we were being extra or dramatic when we say
Speaker 3: that it could literally end all living creatures, plant and
Speaker 3: animal on this planet. Right that this is not this
Speaker 3: is not a joke, This is not being dramatic to
Speaker 3: stir up people and get them scared. No, no, people
Speaker 3: really need to be aware of what's being done at
Speaker 3: this current moment in time.
Speaker 5: M Hm, Jonathan, have you heard anything about.
Speaker 4: This mirror bacteria?
Speaker 5: Mirror bacteria? No, sounds like something that was created in
Speaker 5: a lab.
Speaker 3: Oh yes, and we're gonna Oh, we're gonna go into
Speaker 3: it here. Now, let's go ahead and read this article
Speaker 3: real quick. This is from uh Popular Mechanics. And there's
Speaker 3: actually a YouTube video we're gonna play in a minute
Speaker 3: that breaks it down pretty well. It's a little five
Speaker 3: minute video, but it it does a really eloquent job
Speaker 3: of explaining it to a more easier to understand level.
Speaker 3: So let's go here. For whatever reason, life formed on
Speaker 3: Earth with right handed DNA and left handed DNA proteins,
Speaker 3: or excuse me, for whatever reason life formed on this
Speaker 3: Earth with right handed DNA and left handed proteins. But
Speaker 3: scientists have long wondered if a mirror version of life
Speaker 3: could be created. Okay, while these quote unquote mirror cells
Speaker 3: could have profound medical implications, a new two hundred and
Speaker 3: ninety nine page report warns that a mirror pathogen could
Speaker 3: spell the end of life on Earth, as such a
Speaker 3: microbe would avoid our immune system's natural defense and be
Speaker 3: resistant to antibiotics. Scientists are at least a decade off
Speaker 3: from creating these types of mirror cells, so this global
Speaker 3: discussion is more important than ever. Let's see here. Science
Speaker 3: run amok in is a prominent fixture in post apocalyptic disease,
Speaker 3: and interdimensional monsters and AI are all examples of the
Speaker 3: widespread death courtesy of some misguided scientific vings. We see
Speaker 3: this in a lot of fiction and movies, but once
Speaker 3: in a while, debates and worries about potentially world ending
Speaker 3: research spills out into the real world, and now thirty
Speaker 3: eight prominent biologists are raising the alarm of a new
Speaker 3: threat mirror life. Okay, so no, this is not some
Speaker 3: Spock with a beard scenario. Instead, it's the purposeful creation
Speaker 3: of proteins and DNA that take on the exact mirror
Speaker 3: scherriality or handedness of typical biology found in all living
Speaker 3: things on Earth. For example, DNA is made mostly of sugar,
Speaker 3: which can have left or right handed molecules, but for
Speaker 3: whatever reason, scientists don't know exactly. Life selected right handed
Speaker 3: molecules to form DNA, which is why the double helix
Speaker 3: curves towards the right. Proteins, on the other hand, no
Speaker 3: pun intended use left hand amino acids. This is not
Speaker 3: only true to humans, but all life on Earth. Of course,
Speaker 3: the seemingly arbitrary decision to arrange life in this way
Speaker 3: led to an irresistible question, what if life's handedness formed
Speaker 3: in the mirror direction? Now? A two hundred and nine
Speaker 3: to nine page report, along with commentary published in the
Speaker 3: Journal of Science suggests suggests that maybe pursuing this particular
Speaker 3: path of knowledge isn't the best idea. This is a
Speaker 3: direct quote. Driven by curiosity and plausible applications, some researchers
Speaker 3: had begun to work towards creating life forms composed entirely
Speaker 3: of mirror image biological molecules. The authors wrote in the
Speaker 3: Science article, our analysis suggests that mirror bacteria would likely
Speaker 3: evade many immune mechanisms mediated by siral cheryl molecules, potentially
Speaker 3: causing lethal infection in humans, animals, and plants. So, although
Speaker 3: initially driven by curiosity, mirror cells could have a profound
Speaker 3: impact on HIV and Alzheimer's treatment, according to The New
Speaker 3: York Times. But the flip side of that medical coin
Speaker 3: is that a dangerous mirror microbe could basically ravage the
Speaker 3: plant with little to no resistance our bodies. Immune systems
Speaker 3: are hardwired to detect threats by latching onto left handed
Speaker 3: proteins and right handed DNA, so a cell with a
Speaker 3: mirror construction could evade our bodies natural to physicistems entirely.
Speaker 3: Such a microbe would be also resistant to normal antibiotics.
Speaker 3: A mirror antibiotic would likely arrive too late or you know,
Speaker 3: be too It would be too late to be used,
Speaker 3: too much good, with no protein, and with no protection
Speaker 3: medical or biological. All life could be threatened by this
Speaker 3: hypothetical mirror pandemic. Luckily, scientists haven't created these mirror cells yet,
Speaker 3: but the report estimates that such possibility is likely ten
Speaker 3: years or so away, making this conversation more important than ever.
Speaker 3: This is the last quota mariad unless compelling evidence emerges
Speaker 3: that mirror life would not pose extraordinary dangers. We believe
Speaker 3: that mirror bacteria and other mirror organisms, even those with
Speaker 3: engineered biocontaminate measures, should not be created. We recommend that initially,
Speaker 3: we recommend that initially steps be taken to prevent the
Speaker 3: production of mirror genomes and pre proteomes or functional equivalents
Speaker 3: sufficient to enable the construction of a mirror cell. Okay,
Speaker 3: so I know I just threw a lot of a
Speaker 3: lot of things out and it's some wild things going
Speaker 3: on here. But this is this is.
Speaker 4: The actual report, so you don't have to read the report.
Speaker 4: So this is the two hundred and nine name page
Speaker 4: report that we found. That's the actual report. If people
Speaker 4: really wanted to read into this and like read what
Speaker 4: is actually being produced. It is by Stanford University Libraries.
Speaker 4: And you can't access the entire report and read it verbatim,
Speaker 4: all two hundred and nine to nine pages.
Speaker 3: It is a an eleven point four sore megabyte download,
Speaker 3: and please go check it out Stanford University Libraries. You
Speaker 3: can download the pdf. You can read it for yourself.
Speaker 3: And this is the official peer reviewed documentary and all
Speaker 3: the things that they have found in regard to this.
Speaker 3: So this video will kind of lay out what in
Speaker 3: the actual hell we're talking about with it. And again
Speaker 3: it's not the best description, but I think it will
Speaker 3: do a pretty good job of answering some of the
Speaker 3: questions of like, you know, what the hell a y'all
Speaker 3: talking about? All right, so let's check it out.
Speaker 16: Are mirror organisms, I mean, break it.
Speaker 8: Down for me.
Speaker 15: So think about it this way. Imagine you're building something
Speaker 15: with legos. Okay, I'm with here, all life on Earth.
Speaker 15: It's like using the same type of lego connection over
Speaker 15: and over, but mirror organisms would be different. I'd be
Speaker 15: like flipping that connection around, changing how everything fits together.
Speaker 8: Okay, so like a mirror image.
Speaker 15: Yeah, exactly. It all comes down to something scientists call harmoculality.
Speaker 15: It's a mouthful.
Speaker 8: I know, no worries. You're the expert.
Speaker 15: So every living thing on Earth, I mean everything from
Speaker 15: the tiniest little bacteria to us, it's all built with
Speaker 15: these molecules right, and they have a specific handedness. So
Speaker 15: our DNA and RNA they use right handed molecules, but
Speaker 15: our proteins they use the left handed ones. Mirror organisms
Speaker 15: would flip that whole thing. Ohoh okay, so be like
Speaker 15: using the same lego bricks, but reversing all those connections
Speaker 15: as well. It creates something totally different from anything.
Speaker 4: We've ever seen.
Speaker 16: It's like alien life forms. But right here on Earth
Speaker 16: that's kind of freaky.
Speaker 14: Yeah.
Speaker 16: And this article you sent it talks about how our
Speaker 16: bodies would interact or not interact.
Speaker 8: I guess with these mirror organisms.
Speaker 15: That's one of the biggest worries.
Speaker 16: Right.
Speaker 15: Our bodies are built to deal with a very specific
Speaker 15: kind of life, a certain chirality. Our immune systems they
Speaker 15: wouldn't know how to fight these mirror organisms off.
Speaker 3: I just wouldn't compute exactly.
Speaker 15: It's like trying to fit the wrong key into a lock.
Speaker 15: Our immune system's keys they just wouldn't work on the
Speaker 15: locks of mirror organisms. So they can just you know,
Speaker 15: slip right past our defenses like we weren't even there.
Speaker 16: Okay, so no natural defenses. That's already scary enough, But
Speaker 16: the article also mentions this other risk uncontrolled replication, Like
Speaker 16: what's the worst case scenario there?
Speaker 15: Well, imagine bacteria that our antibiotics just can't kill. Oh wow,
Speaker 15: bacteria that our immune systems can't even see. Mirror organisms
Speaker 15: could just replicate like crazy, spread like wildfire. I mean,
Speaker 15: who knows, Right.
Speaker 16: That's definitely pushing us into nightmare territory. But wait, I
Speaker 16: also read that this whole mirror molecule thing was originally
Speaker 16: seen as a good thing, Like, what was so appealing
Speaker 16: about it at first?
Speaker 14: Oh?
Speaker 15: Yeah, it had its allure for sure. It was all
Speaker 15: about the potential for medicine. Imagine drugs that could target
Speaker 15: super specific areas in the body without being broken down
Speaker 15: by our system, Like they last longer and be way
Speaker 15: more effective. It seemed revolutionary.
Speaker 8: So how do we go.
Speaker 16: From medical miracle to potential apocalypse?
Speaker 15: I think it's about, Well, the more we learn, the
Speaker 15: more we realize how complex life is and how messing
Speaker 15: with that can have consequences we didn't even think of
Speaker 15: makes sense.
Speaker 8: So unintended consequences. And this is where George Church comes.
Speaker 16: In, right, right, right, the Harvard geneticist, he was super
Speaker 16: into mere organism research.
Speaker 15: Hertually is a big proponent.
Speaker 16: Yeah, and the article mentions he actually made a huge breakthrough.
Speaker 15: Oh he did. Back in twenty sixteen. His team created
Speaker 15: a mirror version of DNA polymerase. It's like the essential
Speaker 15: enzyme for DNA replication. It was a big deal.
Speaker 16: So he was actually trying to create mirror life. Like,
Speaker 16: how close are we to actually making a mirror organism?
Speaker 15: That's the million dollar question, isn't it. I mean, figuring
Speaker 15: out how to make a mirror version of DNA polymerase
Speaker 15: it's like figuring out how to make the bricks. Well,
Speaker 15: we're still a long way from building a whole house,
Speaker 15: or in this case, a whole functional mirror cell.
Speaker 8: So there's still a way to go. But his work
Speaker 8: definitely moved.
Speaker 15: Things along how No question it pushed the field forward.
Speaker 15: But then, yeah, his perspective changed.
Speaker 16: The article said, he's actually one of the most outspoken
Speaker 16: scientists against this research.
Speaker 15: Now he's definitely had a change of heart.
Speaker 16: What made him switch sides?
Speaker 15: Well, think about it. This risk of uncontrolled replication, the
Speaker 15: fact that our bodies wouldn't know how to handle mirror organisms,
Speaker 15: those are some pretty serious red flags. I think he
Speaker 15: started realizing, Hey, we need to be way more careful here,
Speaker 15: we need to be responsible with this kind of power.
Speaker 8: That makes sense.
Speaker 16: You don't just create a new life form and hope
Speaker 16: for the best. It's like that whole precautionary principle.
Speaker 15: Thing, right Exactly, if something has the potential to go
Speaker 15: really wrong, maybe we should think twice before doing it.
Speaker 15: And when we're talking about creating whole new life forms, well,
Speaker 15: the potential consequences are huge.
Speaker 16: So are we saying the risk just isn't worth it,
Speaker 16: even if it could lead to amazing medical breakthroughs.
Speaker 15: That's the debate. How do you weigh the potential benefits
Speaker 15: against the risk of creating something we might not be
Speaker 15: able to control.
Speaker 16: Yeah, that's a tough one, Okay. So let's sum up.
Speaker 16: Mere organisms are basically alien life.
Speaker 8: Forms right here on Earth.
Speaker 16: They could be dangerous, maybe even apocalyptic, and even scientists
Speaker 16: who are excited about it are now saying, hold on,
Speaker 16: this is getting kind of scary.
Speaker 15: It's a good reminder that science can move faster than
Speaker 15: our ability to really grasp the consequences.
Speaker 16: You know, it really makes you think, what if mirror
Speaker 16: organisms actually existed? What would that mean for life as
Speaker 16: we know it?
Speaker 8: For evolution?
Speaker 16: Could they make their own ecosystems, their own interactions? And
Speaker 16: that's what I love about these deep dives.
Speaker 3: All Right, So that video had a lot of weird
Speaker 3: AI art that I think was meant to do that.
Speaker 3: And tell me you didn't hear the comparisons to AI
Speaker 3: right of how Like, So you're saying that once it's done,
Speaker 3: it's like it could go super bad and maybe we
Speaker 3: should pull back on and all these things. It was
Speaker 3: kind of funny on that regard. But there's actually another
Speaker 3: news article I wanted to play that is talking from
Speaker 3: the doctor himself about what negative effects can come from this.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 5: That was actually that was a AI podcast.
Speaker 3: I'm aware. I'm fully aware. I thought it was so crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty wild shit.
Speaker 3: I was actually looking at it too, dude.
Speaker 2: This is not something that would organically happen, like this
Speaker 2: is synthetic that like that's how it would happen, would
Speaker 2: be It's I just you know, pulled it up here.
Speaker 2: It says scientists are concerned about the potential dangers of
Speaker 2: creating mirror bacteria, which are synthetic organisms with a reverse
Speaker 2: handedness from normal life. So it wouldn't even organically naturally happen.
Speaker 2: And yet here we go, like we got people that
Speaker 2: think that they can contain ideas and it's like, I
Speaker 2: don't know, dude, maybe we shouldn't be looking into shit
Speaker 2: like this. Why would you even want to look into
Speaker 2: something that would never naturally happen, like what?
Speaker 3: Why?
Speaker 2: Indeed, it makes no sense unless you're planning on using
Speaker 2: it to your advantage to wipe.
Speaker 3: Out a lot of people. I absolutely agree. So with
Speaker 3: that being said, let's read into or let's listen into
Speaker 3: the Canadian Uh this is a news article or news
Speaker 3: clip from a Canadian news source CBC NN Live and
Speaker 3: uh yeah, Canadian, British Columbia. Maybe actually I'm not sure,
Speaker 3: but this is going more in detail about what is happening,
Speaker 3: why the scientists are pulling back on and they actually
Speaker 3: have an expert speaking on the matter.
Speaker 5: Let's listen.
Speaker 14: In the new warning from a group of over two
Speaker 14: dozen biologists, they are calling for a ban on mirror
Speaker 14: cell research, warning it's too dangerous. Mirror bacteria is constructed
Speaker 14: from mirror images of molecules.
Speaker 3: Found in nature.
Speaker 14: They say it could put humans, animals, and plants at
Speaker 14: risk of lethal infections and could lead to the collapse
Speaker 14: of entire ecosystems. In a three hundred page report published
Speaker 14: by Stanford University, researchers say nearer Bacteriia could not evolve
Speaker 14: from existing life, but their creation will become increasingly feasible
Speaker 14: as size advances. Their altered interactions with nature natural organisms
Speaker 14: could lead to profound and highly consequential effects of those
Speaker 14: natural organisms. Now, our next guest is one of those
Speaker 14: scientists raising those concerns. Doctor Michael Kay is a professor
Speaker 14: of biochemistry at the University of Utah who built mirror
Speaker 14: molecules that could be used to develop therapeutics. We reached
Speaker 14: them in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Speaker 4: Thank you, sir for taking the time.
Speaker 18: Thank you very much.
Speaker 14: Okay, very quickly and as simply as possible, if you could.
Speaker 3: Let's just start with perhaps.
Speaker 14: Explaining a little bit very simply, if you could, what
Speaker 14: exactly mirror molecules are.
Speaker 18: Sure, so, all of the natural biomolecules, things like DNA,
Speaker 18: proteins and sugars, have a certain handedness to them, kind
Speaker 18: of like your hands, and it's theoretically possible to make
Speaker 18: versions that are the mirror image like your opposite hand
Speaker 18: of those molecules. But those types of molecules can only
Speaker 18: be made synthetically. They don't occur naturally. And these are
Speaker 18: molecules that have a lot of potential, especially for therapeutics,
Speaker 18: because that are not recognized and degraded by the body,
Speaker 18: and they have the potential to be very long lasting therapeutics.
Speaker 14: So potentially some good could come out of this, But
Speaker 14: we know there are many concerns as scientists have about
Speaker 14: this kind of organism. You once yourself, we know, had
Speaker 14: aspirations to create mirror life, but now you don't, So
Speaker 14: talk me through why.
Speaker 18: So the reasons are partly because of this, uh, you know,
Speaker 18: groups' efforts to research and consider what the potential risks
Speaker 18: are of mirror life. And we've come to the conclusion,
Speaker 18: based on what we know so far, that those risks
Speaker 18: are very serious and that the benefits are are very
Speaker 18: modest in comparison. And it turns out that you can
Speaker 18: access all of the benefits of mirror image molecules and
Speaker 18: therapeutics using chemical techniques. And so the key distinction here
Speaker 18: is making a self replicating mere entire organism like a
Speaker 18: bacteria is where the risk lies, because such an organism
Speaker 18: could grow unchecked.
Speaker 14: And there is, if I understand this correctly, already a
Speaker 14: mirror mode molecule in science. So what's the difference between
Speaker 14: those molecules and mirror life.
Speaker 18: So mirror life has the critical property of being able
Speaker 18: to self replicate. It's something that can take in food
Speaker 18: from the environment and grow like natural life and therefore
Speaker 18: compete with natural life. Mirror molecules are chemically synthesized and inert.
Speaker 18: Once they're made, they cannot do anything else in terms
Speaker 18: of they can't reproduce themselves, they can't grow, they're just
Speaker 18: inert compounds. And so they're in wide use already in
Speaker 18: humans and in science, and have already been proven to
Speaker 18: be very safe and effective, and so there's really no
Speaker 18: risk there. The risk only comes into play once you
Speaker 18: create an entire organism of mirrormage components that can grow,
Speaker 18: taken food from the environment, and potentially compete in a
Speaker 18: hostile way with natural life.
Speaker 4: Talk to us a little bit more.
Speaker 14: What is that risk?
Speaker 4: What is the big concern?
Speaker 18: The big concern is that using bacteria as the key example,
Speaker 18: you know, bacteria are kept in check from growing out
Speaker 18: of control in the natural environment by many different defense mechanisms.
Speaker 18: Our immune system is a great check against their growth
Speaker 18: in causing infections in humans. There are many predators of
Speaker 18: these bacteria that help to keep their population in check,
Speaker 18: and many other organisms eat these organisms and help to
Speaker 18: keep them in check. And so it is likely, based
Speaker 18: on our current information, that a mirror organism would be
Speaker 18: able to avoid all of those natural defense mechanisms, and therefore,
Speaker 18: if it was able to find a good source of
Speaker 18: food would be able to grow unchecked in the environment,
Speaker 18: and if it were to get into humans or plants
Speaker 18: or animals or the ecosystem, it's something that would be
Speaker 18: you know, not controlled by any of the natural control
Speaker 18: mechanisms that otherwise exist.
Speaker 14: So doctor K, how close are we actually to creating
Speaker 14: mirror cells.
Speaker 18: We're not that close. And so our group really determined
Speaker 18: based on the very fast, you know, paced advances and
Speaker 18: underlying technologies between chemical synthesis and synthetic biology, that it
Speaker 18: is now seeming apparent that within our lifetimes, you know,
Speaker 18: we estimate in the next one to three decades or
Speaker 18: so that this could become feasible if there was a
Speaker 18: highly concerted effort, an international consortium, major funding you know,
Speaker 18: from government agencies and others, that this could become a
Speaker 18: reality and that kind of timeframe. But it is not
Speaker 18: feasible today and really not that close to being feasible today. However,
Speaker 18: we thought that given the rapid advancement of technology, that
Speaker 18: this is now looking plausible enough and the not too
Speaker 18: distant future, that this is the time to have a
Speaker 18: you know, reason discussion with a wide range of stakeholders
Speaker 18: across the world to really think about how we can
Speaker 18: head off the significant risks of ultimately making mirror life.
Speaker 14: All right, well, we thank you so much for your
Speaker 14: time today and explaining it all to us.
Speaker 3: Okay, so straight from the expert's mouth, you see the
Speaker 3: inherent risks, right, this could lead to. Now, the thought
Speaker 3: was that if we could maybe get it to the
Speaker 3: realm of dementia, right, and we were to create a
Speaker 3: mirror dementia cell, perhaps it could slip past the affected
Speaker 3: cells and actually start the regrowth process and reverse the
Speaker 3: effects of Alzheimer's and dementia and all these other things.
Speaker 3: But the problem is that with one comes everything else.
Speaker 3: So imagine, Jonathan, imagine all good cult members out there,
Speaker 3: a new pandemic of something that we didn't even list
Speaker 3: here today, some shit we've never heard of before. But
Speaker 3: it is of a strain that is mirrored two hours,
Speaker 3: meaning that our body doesn't even recognize it as an
Speaker 3: outside threat. It slips past all of our immune systems
Speaker 3: and it is able to get in and restructure our DNA,
Speaker 3: and we have nothing to stop it.
Speaker 4: It would take days to be able to be able
Speaker 4: to form something to be able to stop the mere,
Speaker 4: mere replicant, like of any kind of thing I will
Speaker 4: say I wanted to read because it's important, I guess
Speaker 4: in the sense of like, who's actually against this is immunologists,
Speaker 4: synthetic biologists, plant plant pathologists, evolutionary biologists, ecologists, two Nobel laureates.
Speaker 4: There's also people that are the ones that are the researchers,
Speaker 4: the policymakers, the legislators, multiple society members as well. There
Speaker 4: is also the people that creates the vaccines that are
Speaker 4: on board. Like there's multiple people. It's not just the
Speaker 4: thirty eight that are against this. It's gaining traction huge
Speaker 4: in the in the science world because there is a push.
Speaker 4: They've already they've already created the first cell of fully
Speaker 4: synthetic genome, so that's a part of the DNA structure.
Speaker 4: They were able to create that in twenty ten. And
Speaker 4: the two scientists that were leading that, one of them
Speaker 4: has stepped away one hundred and she's like she is
Speaker 4: not about this. And the one researcher that was a
Speaker 4: female as well, that was also included in this group
Speaker 4: that was working spearheading the mirror bacteria project, she stepped
Speaker 4: away and said that like this is completely unethical and
Speaker 4: like we're we're going to screw ourselves over if we
Speaker 4: continue pretty much on this path. So it's not just
Speaker 4: one type of scientists that's saying it. It's many types
Speaker 4: of scientists that are against this type of formation of
Speaker 4: this merror bacteria because it is world ending, because it
Speaker 4: wouldn't just stop at just human DNA. It would It
Speaker 4: could go to plant, it could go to animal, it
Speaker 4: could go it could replicate everything down to a molecule
Speaker 4: and just continuously if it keeps evolving, it will keep growing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it sounds like worse than the upside down from
Speaker 2: Stranger things. Like it's almost like this would inevitably like
Speaker 2: kind of introduce zombie up apocalypse at that point, right,
Speaker 2: because possibly, yes, I mean that bacteria would find a
Speaker 2: way to be able to animate somehow, right. I don't
Speaker 2: know if it would create its own forms or if
Speaker 2: it would have to be parasitic in nature to you
Speaker 2: know a lot like the zombie films or whatever. But
Speaker 2: like you know what I mean, Like we don't really
Speaker 2: even know what the implication.
Speaker 4: And it could take it could take on any form,
Speaker 4: Like take what if it took on the most deadly
Speaker 4: disease ever and it just spread like wildfire because our
Speaker 4: bodies couldn't recognize it. We haud have no nothing to
Speaker 4: defend against it because everything that we've created is in
Speaker 4: the way of the right handed DNA and the left
Speaker 4: handed and so nothing would be effective against it because
Speaker 4: it's the polar opposite, and so there's nothing at all
Speaker 4: that would stop any type of any negative impact, even
Speaker 4: a positive impact. What happens though, if you continuously have
Speaker 4: that dementia is still rebuilding, when does it stop? It
Speaker 4: doesn't have a sequence to stop. It doesn't have the gene,
Speaker 4: it doesn't have any genomes to tell it, Hey, okay,
Speaker 4: you've made too much. Now what happens? What does it
Speaker 4: keep doing? Does it keep growing? Like I think that
Speaker 4: the replications of this is like it's just gonna be endless,
Speaker 4: Like it's gonna be so disastrous that there's no stopping it.
Speaker 4: And it's not just with one thing like they could.
Speaker 4: This could be potentially life threatening to everything on the globe,
Speaker 4: including like down to even plankton. Like if you wiped
Speaker 4: out plankton, you're wiping out like so many things, you're
Speaker 4: pretty much wiping out the globe. Like they're pretty much
Speaker 4: on the same list as bees.
Speaker 3: So think of it as like a flu. Let's say
Speaker 3: they were to cut like not a plandemic, actually like
Speaker 3: regular flu season. Okay, regular cold and sniffles and you
Speaker 3: you drink you some electrir lights and you kind of
Speaker 3: take it easy for a couple of days. Your body
Speaker 3: will fight it off and you'll be fine. Now, let's
Speaker 3: talk about a left hand flu virus that it would
Speaker 3: spread and it would continue to spread. Nobody could stop it,
Speaker 3: and now the entire population of the Earth is just
Speaker 3: going to have the flu indefinitely period because there's no
Speaker 3: way of fighting it. Yeah, it'll ravage your body, it'll
Speaker 3: spread person a person, there is no stopping it. And
Speaker 3: now it will be very normal for everybody to just
Speaker 3: have the sniffles and the coughs from the moment they're
Speaker 3: born to the moment they die. And this is just
Speaker 3: what life is now. Now that's a very low key
Speaker 3: example of something that wouldn't kill everybody, but.
Speaker 4: It would mutate. You look at everything else. Everything else
Speaker 4: continuously mutates, and everything that they would throw at it
Speaker 4: would find a way to mutate around it. Unless say,
Speaker 4: how to use mere mirror technology to make a mere
Speaker 4: antibody to be able to make mirror vaccines that could
Speaker 4: potentially work with our already opposite end of the right hand.
Speaker 4: So like that alone, Like I mean, obviously we're not
Speaker 4: for alogists to like, but that alone is insane amount
Speaker 4: of work in decades and decades of research, Like it
Speaker 4: would be too late by the time they even got
Speaker 4: to it. And that's what a lot of the other
Speaker 4: doctors said, like there's no way if you even start
Speaker 4: down this path. Like that's a lot of the people
Speaker 4: that have talked about at like so there's like, you know,
Speaker 4: the board of ethics and stuff, and even being an anthropologist,
Speaker 4: like we had to go through all the ethics and
Speaker 4: talk about ethics and like when do we stop? Like
Speaker 4: where is the stopping point? That's why AI is such
Speaker 4: a big thing, because it's pushing the boundary of ethics,
Speaker 4: just like this virus.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's the other thing, Jonathan. Now though there's
Speaker 3: human scientists that are stopping this research and all this
Speaker 3: the science is out, the research is out. Is it
Speaker 3: crazy to think that AI wouldn't create this and release
Speaker 3: it on the human population.
Speaker 2: Well, that's what I found right here in discovering what
Speaker 2: could possibly go wrong if this were to be achieved
Speaker 2: or you know, created right, And this is from vox,
Speaker 2: but it's talking about This is actually an article that
Speaker 2: was recently released, like less than a week ago, but
Speaker 2: it says the question is what would happen after you
Speaker 2: succeeded in in building mirror life. At first, it was
Speaker 2: assumed that mirror bacteria would be effectively harmless because they
Speaker 2: can't digest most of the normal handed molecules that make
Speaker 2: up all of existing life. Sure, they could eat simple
Speaker 2: nutrients which do not have the handedness property, but would
Speaker 2: that be enough to let them multiply and spread. Many
Speaker 2: scientists initially assumed that it wouldn't be, meaning that mirror
Speaker 2: life would be safely self limiting, unable to spread too
Speaker 2: far because it would be unable to digest the rest
Speaker 2: of life, human beings very much included. But as they
Speaker 2: studied the possibility further, experts became worried that this wasn't true.
Speaker 2: Unlike previous discussions of mirrored life, we also realized that
Speaker 2: generalists heterotrophe mirror bacteria might find a range of nutrients
Speaker 2: in animal hosts and the environment, and thus would not
Speaker 2: be intrinsically biocontained. So mirror bacteria would be able to
Speaker 2: find enough.
Speaker 3: To eat after all, Even worse, existing life would struggle
Speaker 3: to eat them. That means that creating mirror bacteria would
Speaker 3: be kind of like introducing an invasive species to an ecosystem,
Speaker 3: in this case, the entire planet where it doesn't have
Speaker 3: any predators. Without anything initially evolved to eat or counter its,
Speaker 3: it could probably spread rapidly. Invasive species can be very
Speaker 3: hard to eradicate, even if they don't reach very high populations.
Speaker 3: Mirror bacteria might well be like this, a new species
Speaker 3: of globally distributed environmental bacteria alongside the multitude of existing ones.
Speaker 3: But how catastrophic would the introduction of this new invasive
Speaker 3: species be. Humans and other animals and plants are exposed
Speaker 3: to environmental bacteria all the time, and these aren't usually
Speaker 3: an issue unless, for example, you have a damaged immune system.
Speaker 3: So a team of immunologists worked on the question of
Speaker 3: whether our immune system would respond appropriately to an invasion
Speaker 3: by mirror bacteria. Worryingly, they concluded that it probably would not.
Speaker 3: While some of our immune defense function without they function
Speaker 3: without any specific targeting of a particular pathogen, many of
Speaker 3: them only work by locking out the invading pathogen, which
Speaker 3: we wouldn't be able to do for mirror bacteria, And
Speaker 3: the scientists didn't just find that it might make humans
Speaker 3: sick for the same exact reason, it might make everything
Speaker 3: else sick, every animal, every plant's even plants might be vulnerable,
Speaker 3: though there would be substantial variation exactly how sussusceptible any
Speaker 3: species would be.
Speaker 2: The result, according to the December report in Science, could
Speaker 2: be terrifying. We cannot roll out a scenario in which
Speaker 2: a mirror bacterium acts as an invasive species across many ecosystems,
Speaker 2: causing pervasive, lethal infections in a substantial fraction of plant
Speaker 2: and animal species, including humans. They were saying that saying
Speaker 2: a plausible result was unprecedented and irreversible harm.
Speaker 5: It is hard to overstate how severe the risk could be.
Speaker 2: Immunologist some Russian guy said, one of the co authors
Speaker 2: of the technical report warned in a statement sent to me,
Speaker 2: and said living in an area contaminated with mirror bacteria
Speaker 2: could be similar to living with severe immune deficiencies. Any
Speaker 2: exposure to contaminated dust or soil could be fatal.
Speaker 3: Oo any introduction. Wow, Yeah, so it's basically like it
Speaker 3: would basically be like, imagine every person on the planet.
Speaker 5: Now has AIDS.
Speaker 2: That's really like kind of what it would be like,
Speaker 2: Like any possible sickness that is floating around, You're done.
Speaker 3: You're done everything as soon as it makes a left
Speaker 3: handed conversion. And if at all possible that that left
Speaker 3: handed DNA strand or or virus strand or whatever was
Speaker 3: to enter in to your body, you basically just broke
Speaker 3: the chain sequence that allows you to exist. That that's
Speaker 3: basically what we're talking about here, right, Just.
Speaker 4: Drop nukes on the entire Earth at this point, like
Speaker 4: that's you're You're gonna devastate everything could did you imagine?
Speaker 4: Oh my god, the implications is just unreal of how
Speaker 4: many things could mutate and change and kill off everything,
Speaker 4: and you couldn't get ahead of it. If it's affecting
Speaker 4: every living thing, every organism, period, there's no stopping it.
Speaker 4: It's it's gone. Like you're done.
Speaker 3: We're talking about rewriting the atomic structure of everything.
Speaker 2: It's like the the one episode of Rick and Morty
Speaker 2: where they talk about space aids. Yes, kind of what
Speaker 2: this would be really like, because it would be something
Speaker 2: so harmful and detrimental to the not only human race,
Speaker 2: but every single living thing here, you'd just be done.
Speaker 2: It just be you'd wipe out the entire planet. And
Speaker 2: which is why it's so fascinating. Like, uh, I mean,
Speaker 2: don't get me wrong, Like I'm not somebody who is
Speaker 2: waiting for the end of the world to happen, and
Speaker 2: I hope and pray that it doesn't happen in our lifetimes.
Speaker 3: But with the level of evil that is constantly in
Speaker 3: the world, especially at the highest of levels among the
Speaker 3: elites and the people that are funding you know, these
Speaker 3: this kind of science, I wouldn't put it past them
Speaker 3: that they would create this, Like, I mean, why drop
Speaker 3: a nuke when you can just do this just you know,
Speaker 3: make everybody essentially just piles of mush.
Speaker 4: I mean, but that's the thing though, even if you
Speaker 4: even if the New World Order wanted to use this,
Speaker 4: there's no end game, Like there's no stopping it. So
Speaker 4: like there's no going underground in like, hey, in fifty years,
Speaker 4: we can come back up. No, because those like the
Speaker 4: only way that it would happen is like everything that's
Speaker 4: little will probably reset itself and eventually maybe figure it
Speaker 4: out and maybe have two sequencing maybe they end up
Speaker 4: with both, you know, but there's no stopping it. So
Speaker 4: I don't see the purpose of creating this because even
Speaker 4: if they did create it and release it, then it
Speaker 4: would just be world ending for everyone for everything, period,
Speaker 4: for all of time, unless they're trying to do the
Speaker 4: whole space thing, because that's like a huge push right
Speaker 4: now as for space.
Speaker 3: So once this gets released to the Earth, it's uninhabitable
Speaker 3: at that point, and if not instantly, give it ten
Speaker 3: years and it will be so. Then they'll be forced
Speaker 3: to find life, one know, other plants, or be able
Speaker 3: to sustain life outside of the Earth. I just don't.
Speaker 4: I just don't see the purpose of it, except for
Speaker 4: scientists want to keep pushing the boundaries. It reminds me
Speaker 4: of Frankenstein. Yes, like how far is too far?
Speaker 3: Once again? They always ask if they can, They never
Speaker 3: stop to think if they should, but thankfully are Yeah,
Speaker 3: a lot of these experts are coming out saying no, no, no, everybody,
Speaker 3: pump the brakes, stop doing this shit. Once you open
Speaker 3: in this particular Pandora's box, and yes that's a metaphor,
Speaker 3: but not exactly on this one. Once it's released and
Speaker 3: once it's out and able to be replicated and able
Speaker 3: to sustain some sort of a life. The game is over.
Speaker 4: Well, they're wanting to ban it permanently, like make it
Speaker 4: a global ban. Thank God for all research period.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So I mean, don't you would you necessarily put
Speaker 3: it past people like Bill Gates and people that want
Speaker 3: to see the world's population be decreased substantially? Would you
Speaker 3: necessarily put it past them to not necessarily release this
Speaker 3: right now?
Speaker 2: They would probably wait until there was a cure. Somehow
Speaker 2: they come up with some god given cure.
Speaker 3: Right to this, it's a miracle. How did they discover
Speaker 3: it in just the perfect timing? Right? Yeah, they wouldn't
Speaker 3: release this until they had the cure. So that's what
Speaker 3: I'm saying.
Speaker 2: If this were to happen, that means that they already
Speaker 2: have the cure, I would think, because then you'd be
Speaker 2: able to use it as an actual weapon.
Speaker 5: Iran, you want to get a little fucking lippy.
Speaker 3: With us, baby, how about how about some mirrored bacteria
Speaker 3: that we just drop all over your candy?
Speaker 4: Ask right, I just don't see I just I personally
Speaker 4: don't see this as that they have so many already
Speaker 4: known proven pathogens that can wipe out people in a heartbeat.
Speaker 4: So like potentially you're talking about like it wouldn't be
Speaker 4: controllable though, it wouldn't be containable even if you dropped
Speaker 4: it on Iran. It would spread like wildfire globally in
Speaker 4: a heartbeat. So personally, I don't see this as a hey,
Speaker 4: we're gonna keep down this path. I mean, AI is
Speaker 4: a lot more effective or any any of the tons
Speaker 4: and tons and tons of viruses and pathogens they have,
Speaker 4: they can They've made such deadly pathogens. It's under like
Speaker 4: the most severe lock and key. So I'm behest just
Speaker 4: I don't see it being I don't see it being productive.
Speaker 3: No, but that I think that's the point. What the
Speaker 3: big supervillain, not the one that like Superman comes in
Speaker 3: and saves the day, I mean the real super villains
Speaker 3: that you see in these movies that like are trying
Speaker 3: to draw in all the asteroids to fuck up the earth,
Speaker 3: even with them on it. I think that's the point.
Speaker 3: I feel like certain people just want to watch the
Speaker 3: world burn and yeah, they'll be burned up as a
Speaker 3: part of it, but like that's the way it is.
Speaker 3: Because because everything's wrong, life is horrible, we just need
Speaker 3: to we need to end at all, And there's too
Speaker 3: many psychopaths with power out there that I think would
Speaker 3: actually really be spearheading this for that purpose. I hope
Speaker 3: I'm wrong maybe, but.
Speaker 2: Inner dimensional Aliens, we're gonna need you to fly over
Speaker 2: these laboratories to help prevent this kind of shit from happening.
Speaker 5: We would really appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Benefited from this, Like, yeah, the Aliens would be the ones.
Speaker 4: If they reset the Earth, it would have to, It
Speaker 4: would wipe it completely clean. Now a whole new sleep.
Speaker 3: What happens if the Aliens are of the left hand variety.
Speaker 3: Their DNA is left handed, so we're.
Speaker 4: Just dying while they're thriving and taking over.
Speaker 3: As soon as they make their appearance to Earth and
Speaker 3: they shake the first hand, that's it. The game is up.
Speaker 3: That's a real possibility that I didn't even know was
Speaker 3: real until this episode.
Speaker 5: Hey, never know. I hope that the Aliens are the
Speaker 5: good guys.
Speaker 2: We always assure that the Aliens would be the good
Speaker 2: guys though right like.
Speaker 3: No, I have not.
Speaker 4: I've said up and down, shit, they they're not gonna
Speaker 4: be good.
Speaker 3: No, well, there's no savior coming, y'all.
Speaker 2: But think about it, logically though, like not to go
Speaker 2: too far, that's logical, but think about it, thinking.
Speaker 3: About it logically, if the aliens were bad, would we
Speaker 3: still be here? Like yeah, realistically, they're so far advanced
Speaker 3: in the future. If they hated us, they would have
Speaker 3: fucking ended us already.
Speaker 8: Dude.
Speaker 4: Maybe they're like peaceful and we just don't know it.
Speaker 3: I think they're kind of using us, Like.
Speaker 4: I mean, we would be a good cattle.
Speaker 3: I mean, I hate snakes, but I'm not eradicating every
Speaker 3: snake on Earth. They have a purpose. They eat rats.
Speaker 3: You know, I hate spiders, but I'm not trying to
Speaker 3: eradicate them because their webs killed the insects. Maybe the
Speaker 3: extraterrestrial life forms don't want to eradicate humans because we
Speaker 3: serve some sort of a purpose for them. I don't know,
Speaker 3: but these are all the things that are all hypotheticals.
Speaker 4: Maybe we're like blood blanks, like blade, Yeah, we're stuck
Speaker 4: up in the blood blank blood banks. Wow, where those
Speaker 4: little baggies where they like suctioning out all the like
Speaker 4: the life forms. It's like that movie, uh with Chanting
Speaker 4: Tatum and like how they like harvest whole planets for
Speaker 4: like that special stuff like what's you to say? And
Speaker 4: there's so many video it's so many movies about that
Speaker 4: us being cattle for some type.
Speaker 2: If there are any aliens that are listening to this,
Speaker 2: I want to know that that is not the opinion
Speaker 2: of the conspiracy collective.
Speaker 3: That is their opinions. And I don't have anything negative
Speaker 3: to say about you.
Speaker 2: Therefore, please don't probe my botthole. You can probe Jacobs though.
Speaker 3: Look, I'm not saying guaranteed the aliens are bad. I
Speaker 3: am saying that until proving innocent, they are guilty. I
Speaker 3: am not of that belief where it's like, well we
Speaker 3: don't know, so let's hope for the best. No, no, no,
Speaker 3: they are guilty until proven innocent. That's how you have
Speaker 3: to address life these days.
Speaker 8: Dude.
Speaker 4: Yeah, if a dragon popped up, I'd be like.
Speaker 3: If a dragon. If a dragon popped up, I'm not
Speaker 3: assuming that it's like trying to communicate with me and
Speaker 3: give me the elixir of life and lead me to
Speaker 3: its horde of gold. I'm assuming it's about to fuck
Speaker 3: me up. Yeah, I mean, yes, you know.
Speaker 14: I know.
Speaker 3: Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm the wrong guy for looking
Speaker 3: at a dragon and seeing Danger. But you know, I'm
Speaker 3: good with my position on that one.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm jumping on the back of that motherfucker. Dude,
Speaker 2: I'm just.
Speaker 3: Gonna I hope it works well. I hope that it works,
Speaker 3: and I hope I'm wrong and that you have a
Speaker 3: whole like the never ending story you and this dragon
Speaker 3: just ride forever. I hope I'm wrong.
Speaker 2: Falcore Fouci, Yeah, or dude, I just I've seen How
Speaker 2: To Train Your Dragon too many times.
Speaker 5: It just seems too awesome.
Speaker 3: Obsessed with the movies. That's something.
Speaker 4: The live action coming out. I can't wait.
Speaker 3: I'm so excited just saying I didn't even know that
Speaker 3: was a thing.
Speaker 4: It comes out this year.
Speaker 3: You need to watch the commercial for it. Bro it
Speaker 3: is watch it. Fuck yes, I will be all over whatever.
Speaker 3: We're like a live action whatever. I just want. I
Speaker 3: want to see the live action Move Foster movie too.
Speaker 3: Maybe I'm a child for that, but you know what,
Speaker 3: I don't really not at all if it does the
Speaker 3: true backstory to how Scar got his name Scar because
Speaker 3: his original name was the word for garbage, and like
Speaker 3: why he has such a bendetta against his brother Mufassa
Speaker 3: for taking his throne because he was the firstborn. If
Speaker 3: they do it right, I'm fucking pumped.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't really care.
Speaker 5: I mean, we're counting on Disney to do something right,
Speaker 5: so I know, and they never do.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's it's one of those old tales, like
Speaker 3: all the old Disney movies, like the The Brother's Grim,
Speaker 3: like the Snow White Tail. Disney made that super kid
Speaker 3: friendly when in reality it did not have a kid
Speaker 3: friendly ending.
Speaker 4: I love The Brothers Grim.
Speaker 3: I mean yeah, but all right, all right, so we're
Speaker 3: kind of coming to the end of this episode. I
Speaker 3: know we have gone on on some tangents here, but
Speaker 3: if we could, Jonathan, could you pull up that Instagram
Speaker 3: video one more time and let's just hit on as
Speaker 3: we've read each of these individually and we've learned more
Speaker 3: about them. Again, this British dude kind of does this
Speaker 3: with a comedic flare, but it's not really funny when
Speaker 3: you look at the truth of these things. So, you know,
Speaker 3: as we wrap up, maybe we should just remember all
Speaker 3: of what could potentially be coming our way right now
Speaker 3: as we're entering.
Speaker 4: Twenty twenty five for eleven of his two part eleven. Yeah,
Speaker 4: if you see the little top part of the blue,
Speaker 4: as says Part eleven, because he like literally did it
Speaker 4: all last year as well, and like everything he's been
Speaker 4: talking about has been I will say he is like,
Speaker 4: you know, has some attitude about him, but like he's
Speaker 4: dropping information at a fast paced rate where people are
Speaker 4: kind of like should maybe pay attention of, like, hey,
Speaker 4: these are actual, real things.
Speaker 5: Not to say again, just there's a refresher here, does.
Speaker 6: These X here the currently nameless potential next pandemic or
Speaker 6: did Elon Musk name you. I've killed over one hundred
Speaker 6: and fifty people in the Congo and nobody knows exactly
Speaker 6: what I am, so the first one, well though, they
Speaker 6: do think I might be severe malaria. Put severe in
Speaker 6: front of anything, and I'm happy. Hi, I'm new world
Speaker 6: screwwork any different to old world screwworm. They found me
Speaker 6: in cattle coming from Mexico to the US, and I
Speaker 6: eat warm blooded animals from the inside out, including humans.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, then you can stay Avian flu here. Don't
Speaker 6: need your government named bird flu. Of course, the state
Speaker 6: of emergency in California, and the first severe case of
Speaker 6: ME has been found in a human in Louisiana. It's
Speaker 6: great work. And there's that word severe again. Empox here,
Speaker 6: severe cases of ME in the US and the UK
Speaker 6: all severe, severe, severe severe. There's almost sixty thousand cases
Speaker 6: of ME globally this year. Great work, cholera.
Speaker 3: But how when you're so preventable, you.
Speaker 6: See, well there's a more severe version or severe version,
Speaker 6: of course, denge here Buenos dia a. See I was
Speaker 6: only spreading in South America, But now I'm global.
Speaker 3: Ou bond your.
Speaker 6: Guten targe and howdy then, and I'm mirror bacteria? Is
Speaker 6: this a time for reflection?
Speaker 8: Stupid?
Speaker 6: They're calling for scientists to hold the creation of me
Speaker 6: as long story short eye could destroy all life on earth.
Speaker 6: And are scientists going to hold the creation of this
Speaker 6: potentially life destroying bacteria? They're humans?
Speaker 3: No, I couldn't agree more seriously.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you can't really put a whole lot of faith
Speaker 5: in humanity.
Speaker 3: That's uh, that's anymore.
Speaker 5: Most people's problem is putting faith in humanity.
Speaker 3: For the most part, we just wanted to break it
Speaker 3: on down. And we appreciate you ravenly for bringing all
Speaker 3: this to our attention and your time today.
Speaker 4: You're welcome. Yeah, there's lots of happening so constantly have
Speaker 4: to keep watching and reading and seeing what's going on
Speaker 4: in the science community. I just happen to see that
Speaker 4: though on that popular mechanics website. I will say that
Speaker 4: if people really want to like be able to dive
Speaker 4: into what's going on globally, like in the science world
Speaker 4: and stuff like that, it's a good website to and
Speaker 4: it gives you like multiple articles for each thing. So
Speaker 4: shout out to the to the little website that you
Speaker 4: can find more information on.
Speaker 2: Hell yeah, hells yeah, Raven, did you want to give
Speaker 2: out any of your information if anybody wants to follow you?
Speaker 4: I guess the good old Tiki of the talkie world
Speaker 4: is you know, Disappearing, which.
Speaker 3: Oh well yeah that uh.
Speaker 4: But my TikTok and Instagram is dark Huntress nine nine,
Speaker 4: so you guys can follow me there and I do reply.
Speaker 4: I I got a lot of people from the cult
Speaker 4: that message me asking me about conspiracies and all sorts
Speaker 4: of stuff and drop an information for them, So I
Speaker 4: am more than happy to talk to people.
Speaker 5: Let's go, Jacob, how about some knife fans up in here?
Speaker 3: Dude. I'm gonna have to do this weirdly because my
Speaker 3: microphone is as Zack. Oh, okay, now I'm gonna use
Speaker 3: my original mic Okay, cool, so good cult members everywhere, near,
Speaker 3: far and all over the globe, or the flat Earth's
Speaker 3: not true and just throw shape one way or another.
Speaker 3: If this episode did speak to you, and if you do,
Speaker 3: in fact see the inherent dangers of what's coming around
Speaker 3: the corner, and you want to get the word out to.
Speaker 19: People, please at this hit the five stars, hit the shares,
Speaker 19: the lights, subscribe to comments, leave a post lever review,
Speaker 19: and shares with your friends and family.
Speaker 3: Share this episode everywhere.
Speaker 19: Ladies and gentlemen, please help us boost these algorithms. And
Speaker 19: what I mean by that is this, the more activity
Speaker 19: our algorithm sees across all of our listening platforms, the
Speaker 19: more we get promoted to more potential.
Speaker 3: Listeners who could then become potential cult members like the
Speaker 3: rest of you.
Speaker 19: Find, Ladies and gentlemen, why you're ready to go check
Speaker 19: out Metamisteries Jonathan's other show and give them the five
Speaker 19: star reviews and the shares and the comments over there.
Speaker 3: Go check out kJ night YouTube channel and give me
Speaker 3: the follow us subscribes and the lights on that channel.
Speaker 3: If we thank you for everybody's already gone and done so.
Speaker 3: And with that being said, this was another.
Speaker 2: Beautiful episode of the Cults of Conspiracy.
Speaker 5: And my name's Jonathan.
Speaker 3: I'm Jacob un recently and there's one very born, extremely
Speaker 3: vital beast of information we need you to learn just
Speaker 3: as soon as humanly possible. Hey, cult members, Jacob here
Speaker 3: just want to ask who wants better sex? The best
Speaker 3: way to get started is to go to Adam and
Speaker 3: Eve dot com Right now. Adam Eve is offering fifty
Speaker 3: percent off just about any item, but that's not all.
Speaker 3: When you get one item, they will also send three
Speaker 3: bonus sexy items and six free movies. They offered a
Speaker 3: screet shipping as your privacy is a priority. Plus free
Speaker 3: shipping on your entire order doesn't matter how much you
Speaker 3: spend or what you buy. All we packaged and sent
Speaker 3: discreetly for free. That's fifty percent off one item and
Speaker 3: ten free gifts to boot bring more pleasure and satisfaction
Speaker 3: into your bedroom. Just go to Adam and Eve dot
Speaker 3: com and select any one item. It could be an
Speaker 3: adventurous new toy or anything you desire. Just enter the
Speaker 3: offer code cult at checkout and you'll get fifty percent
Speaker 3: off almost any item, plus ten free gifts, three bonus items,
Speaker 3: six free movies, and free shipping. Use the offer code
Speaker 3: CULT That's Cult at Adam and eve dot com. Now,
Speaker 3: this is an exclusive offer specific to this podcast, so
Speaker 3: be sure to use this code to get you not
Speaker 3: just the discount and the free goodies, but also the
Speaker 3: one hundred percent free shipping with the code cult