Speaker 1: Meaning a live man like this man letting butterfly flaven
Speaker 1: his wing, big down in the force. Man, it gonna
Speaker 1: cause a tree fall, letting five thousand miles away. Man,
Speaker 1: evening nobody's seen, nobody else I see.
Speaker 2: You don't mean no man. It's like you follow a
Speaker 2: little story.
Speaker 1: And you got directed fect that that's the win. Man.
Speaker 2: Don't like to dag on the panel.
Speaker 1: Man, you don't matter many. There are a few things
Speaker 1: more difficult to be honest about than President Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: To say that opinions on the man are polarized is
Speaker 1: perhaps an understatement. The right wing coalition brought together in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four is fracturing on any number of lines,
Speaker 1: with foreign policy being perhaps the most visible. But at
Speaker 1: a more basic level, we're seeing a shifting, a shifting
Speaker 1: coalition with highly disparate priorities. People want different things. A
Speaker 1: few weeks back, of course, we spoke about Thomas Massey's
Speaker 1: loss in the Kentucky primary against Ed Gallarin sort of
Speaker 1: Navy seal cipher, and we saw a sharp divide, sort
Speaker 1: of illustrating these two camps. Under fifty five, we see
Speaker 1: concerns about foreign policy or entanglement with Israel. And the
Speaker 1: economy ranking well above loyalty to the president perceived or actual.
Speaker 1: In the spirit of this divide right kind of delving
Speaker 1: into it, I thought it might be interesting with my
Speaker 1: friend Stormy Waters to go through the president's campaign promises
Speaker 1: Agenda forty seven, a list of twenty promises he made
Speaker 1: on the campaign, the broad themes of course, order and
Speaker 1: immigration at the top, which to be we have seen
Speaker 1: some successes, albeit some setbacks. Economy. A major part of
Speaker 1: the protest vote against Biden was disastrous economic decisions. Some
Speaker 1: of this was, unfortunately out of even Biden's hands, right,
Speaker 1: simply the sort of changing tides of global finance, but
Speaker 1: other parts were deliberate choices. Obviously, this has produced a
Speaker 1: lot of the angst, a lot of the anger against
Speaker 1: President Trump. Many young people, particularly I say young people
Speaker 1: people under fifty five, who are still wage earners, don't
Speaker 1: necessarily care about the stock market as much. They don't
Speaker 1: necessarily even feel or see that as a win because
Speaker 1: they are still in their earning years. Things like gas prices,
Speaker 1: things like their ability to keep a decent job when
Speaker 1: faced with foreign competition. Well, that's a lot different than
Speaker 1: a guy who's on Social security medicaid or their own
Speaker 1: personal retirements. They have different priorities. Obviously closely related. Energy.
Speaker 1: The Biden energy policy is very very odd, right. We
Speaker 1: had this sort of green mafia running things, throwing a
Speaker 1: ton of money around in government contracts. And while there
Speaker 1: have been some progress made, well, gas is five dollars
Speaker 1: depending on where you are, and that really gets us
Speaker 1: to the crux of the issue. Foreign policy. Trump promised
Speaker 1: peace in the Middle East and negotiated into the Ukraine conflict,
Speaker 1: focusing on America first. I feel like I don't need
Speaker 1: to tell you that has not happened, That isn't working.
Speaker 1: Things aren't going as he promised. Ukraine continues to grind on.
Speaker 1: More and more men are shoved into a meat grinder
Speaker 1: on both sides, although to be fair, it seems as
Speaker 1: if the balance has firmly shifted on that front. But yeah,
Speaker 1: guess what we got a new war. Even if it
Speaker 1: isn't officially labeled one, it is functionally a war now.
Speaker 1: Some of the culture stuff, talking about parnal rights, getting
Speaker 1: the woke policies out of education, there is broad agreement
Speaker 1: on that. Even the most radical younger thinkers agree that
Speaker 1: that stuff needs to end. There's been some positive development,
Speaker 1: but not a lot. Similarly, the promises around reforming the
Speaker 1: deep state, the administrative state, the swamp that we saw
Speaker 1: early with the flurry of executive orders and with DOGE
Speaker 1: was very, very popular across the board. The only time
Speaker 1: where Donald Trump had above fifty percent approval with Generation
Speaker 1: Z inaggregate, not simply men, the whole generation was in
Speaker 1: those first couple months. Also, we have seen moves to
Speaker 1: be fair to basically end the weaponization of the DOJ
Speaker 1: and the FBI against people like us. Not perfect, but
Speaker 1: it's something that must be said. Now. That is an
Speaker 1: issue where sort of the broad coalition is linked up.
Speaker 1: Almost everyone agrees on that. But when we get to
Speaker 1: be honest, boom er communism, these entitlements for senior citizens,
Speaker 1: that's sort of a slap in the face for younger people,
Speaker 1: especially when faced with major economic concerns. Why are you
Speaker 1: cutting taxes on Social Security when I'm paying out the nose.
Speaker 1: Why are you promising no reforms to this program that
Speaker 1: is continually almost about to go bust. We are at
Speaker 1: the bottom of this pyramid scheme and a lot of people,
Speaker 1: particularly under fifty five, are working under the assumption that
Speaker 1: they will never get to see the benefit of Social Security.
Speaker 1: The removing of taxes, let alone preserving the program doesn't
Speaker 1: really help them at all. Now shure the no tax
Speaker 1: on tips thing, that's good for kind of lower end workers,
Speaker 1: but that feels like chump chain in exchange. And lastly,
Speaker 1: the other big platform is election security, which has been
Speaker 1: an abject and total failure. The Save Act has been floundering.
Speaker 1: It might be dead. I can't remember for a long time,
Speaker 1: and just look at the most recent elections in La. Right,
Speaker 1: it's not working. So when you lay this out, sure
Speaker 1: there have been wins. There have been wins on all
Speaker 1: number of different things, regulation, some on the border, law enforcement,
Speaker 1: but especially for that under fifty crowd, the people who
Speaker 1: swung for Massy. It doesn't seem like it's going well.
Speaker 1: And when the president's chosen voices, figures like Mark Levin
Speaker 1: are basically saying, well, we don't care if we lose.
Speaker 1: We don't care if the Democrats, the Democrat Party, as
Speaker 1: he says, control everything ruin your life. So long as
Speaker 1: we get our war in Israel. Well, it's really no
Speaker 1: shock that things are splitting apart. People have divergent interests
Speaker 1: people who were getting what they want and people who aren't.
Speaker 1: And I think at this point, Stormy and I's thesis
Speaker 1: is almost completely and totally vindicated that Gop Samshin option
Speaker 1: right this sort of wilful destruction, because clearly things can
Speaker 1: be done. Clearly there's a lot of energy behind getting
Speaker 1: certain objection objectives accomplished, but not all of them, and
Speaker 1: not the ones you and I care about. So without
Speaker 1: further ado, let's kick it over the interview with Stormy.
Speaker 1: I think it's a good one. It's a little bit
Speaker 1: lighter than our previous ones have been. And look, we
Speaker 1: are talking about Donald Trump, but we're trying to do
Speaker 1: this in a fair way. And this isn't just the
Speaker 1: kind of endless dooming. But at the same time, we're
Speaker 1: not playing trusters here. This is I think a fairly
Speaker 1: objective view of the situation. Before I get into that,
Speaker 1: this show is supported by viewers like you. A few
Speaker 1: bucks a month on Patreon, Subsack, or gum Road. Get
Speaker 1: the episodes early in ad free. If you want to
Speaker 1: check out my sponsor, Acxial Remote Fitness and Coaching does
Speaker 1: great work. And if you go to Fox and Son's
Speaker 1: Coffee and use the code Jay Burton, all one word,
Speaker 1: you get fifteen percent off. I like their stuff. It's
Speaker 1: pretty good coffee. And if you heard the most recent
Speaker 1: episode of Timeline Earth, they also like it. So you know,
Speaker 1: these are the kind of people, myself and Timeline Earth,
Speaker 1: that you should you should take seriously. You should make
Speaker 1: financial decisions, family decisions, legal decisions based off the advice
Speaker 1: you get from these two programs. And so yeah, buy coffee. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here's Stormy Waters. All right, Stormy Waters, welcome back to
Speaker 1: the Jay Burden Show.
Speaker 2: How are you doing? Then? Keep tooing? Well, man, know
Speaker 2: about yourself.
Speaker 1: Never been better. So we have a gimmick for this show.
Speaker 1: I've been thinking it would be fun to do a
Speaker 1: sort of a grading of President Trump, and not in
Speaker 1: the normal way you and I do it, where we
Speaker 1: just kind of vaguely whine about things that are, you know,
Speaker 1: sticking in our crawl. I wanted to come up with
Speaker 1: an actual grading metric like this or a college course.
Speaker 1: And conveniently I remembered that in twenty twenty four, the
Speaker 1: RNC at the pest to President Trump adopted the Agenda
Speaker 1: forty seven, which they split into twenty core commitments. So
Speaker 1: this will be easy, right, we can just take the
Speaker 1: number of points out of twenty turn it into a
Speaker 1: letter grade. So before we get into that stormy, what's
Speaker 1: your what's your initial expectation? Right, what do you think
Speaker 1: we're going to hit on this?
Speaker 2: I think we're going to blackpill, trun out and panic
Speaker 2: in our way through this. But I'm thinking a d.
Speaker 1: Ooh, you might be overconfident. I'm guessing, and to be fair,
Speaker 1: I've read through these, but I wasn't gaming it out.
Speaker 1: I'm thinking we're going to land firmly in the f category.
Speaker 1: I'm guessing somewhere in the like forty to fifty percent.
Speaker 1: But without further ado, I figure let's launch into it.
Speaker 1: So the first one, and this is multipart and if
Speaker 1: we get some of them, willward partial credit. So number
Speaker 1: one seal the border and stop the migrant invasion. So
Speaker 1: at least on the first one, I think we actually
Speaker 1: have to give him credit for that. Right, that seems
Speaker 1: to have been done. The amount of direct border crossing,
Speaker 1: like people hopping the fence, seems to be way down.
Speaker 1: But as far as stopping the invasion, I'm curious what
Speaker 1: your thoughts are on that.
Speaker 2: I think we're still being like, Okay, so you stopped
Speaker 2: a bunch of people coming from the dairying gap across
Speaker 2: the southern border. Uh, you've basically done virtually nothing on
Speaker 2: the northern border. The fucking Indians that you kick out,
Speaker 2: they get their H one B canceled whatever. They just
Speaker 2: fly to Canada and drive back and then work under
Speaker 2: the table like you've he's he's closed half of the
Speaker 2: borders that we have, and God closed the other two
Speaker 2: because we have oceans. But like, Canada's a fucking problem,
Speaker 2: and he seems to forget it exists, because I guess
Speaker 2: Israel exists.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there are many things in that category. Now. I
Speaker 1: will also say the one area where I have seen
Speaker 1: a lot of genuine reform is in the refugee programs,
Speaker 1: so for instance, and this is a genuinely positive change.
Speaker 1: Like I obviously, if you've listened to my show, you're
Speaker 1: where I'm not particularly positive with regards to the president.
Speaker 1: But I follow a lot of progressives and immigration activists.
Speaker 1: It's helpful, right you can see what's happening on their
Speaker 1: side of things, and they are losing it, freaking out
Speaker 1: because I don't think there has been a non white
Speaker 1: refugee allowed into the country in four months, which Ogain
Speaker 1: like the refugee program was a big problem. It was
Speaker 1: never the top line issue. But you know what, that's positive.
Speaker 1: And so in the spirit of fairness, Stormy, I feel
Speaker 1: like we give half credit on the first.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean I would actually go to even further
Speaker 2: friend of ours, I'm helping get a visa to come
Speaker 2: get out of one European hellhole to come live in America.
Speaker 2: And in conversations with like probably like the best immigration
Speaker 2: attorney in Florida, he's basically like, all right, well you
Speaker 2: can what you're going to do. You know, this strategy
Speaker 2: that you're going to go with is like there's like
Speaker 2: a one percent chance that this strategy won't work out,
Speaker 2: and then of that one percent, you have a ninety
Speaker 2: nine percent chance of that not happening because you're white.
Speaker 2: Because even with like the existing visas, I like the
Speaker 2: not h one b's, but like the there's I think
Speaker 2: like a hundred different visa categories. What people would do
Speaker 2: is do change of status. And like, all right, so
Speaker 2: let's say like you know, you're here on a work
Speaker 2: visa and you marry some fat woman you know, at
Speaker 2: I don't know, at a at a communist bookstore or something,
Speaker 2: you could just do a change of status and basically
Speaker 2: become a resident in virtually like one step, and they
Speaker 2: were basically just letting things go. You saw this in
Speaker 2: that in that statement that the State Department put out recently,
Speaker 2: like hey, we're cracking down on enforcement. Whatever. It turns out,
Speaker 2: cracking down on enforcement means that your change of status
Speaker 2: determination is the approval is racial. And the lawyer was
Speaker 2: chimping out about it, like freaking out, like, oh, well, no,
Speaker 2: you're the Hill. Just be fine, you're white. So even
Speaker 2: internally there apparently is quite a bit of racism going on.
Speaker 2: So I'm going to give in. I'm going to give
Speaker 2: them full marks on that. Okay, we can we can
Speaker 2: handle it. We can handle the Canadian problem later, I guess.
Speaker 1: But given the before and after, I feel like it
Speaker 1: needs to be said. All right, So point two carry
Speaker 1: out the largest deportation op in American history. So I
Speaker 1: was actually curious right to run the data on this,
Speaker 1: because the next best comparable event is Operation Wetback Right
Speaker 1: fifty three to fifty four, which peaked at one point
Speaker 1: one million deportations. So this is really going to depend
Speaker 1: on how you count it, right, So direct deportations are
Speaker 1: sitting in about six hundred thousand, lower or higher depending
Speaker 1: on who you ask. Now there are about two point
Speaker 1: two counted in self deportations. Now we also have to
Speaker 1: understand the population of the country has absolutely exploded.
Speaker 2: Yep, there are fifty three million people in America. I'm
Speaker 2: of Operation Wetback.
Speaker 1: So if we're counting direct deportations, not even in absolute terms, no,
Speaker 1: if we're counting in relative terms also, So we're gonna
Speaker 1: go with a zero on that one. Like it's sure,
Speaker 1: it's something, but it is not the largest in history.
Speaker 2: And it's one of those promises that if you gave me,
Speaker 2: I would forgive a lot of the other thing that
Speaker 2: we are going to get to on the scoreboard, right,
Speaker 2: and look like I get it, you know what. Things
Speaker 2: are difficult, Things aren't going great. But as your no
Speaker 2: doubt of where Stormy. Greg Bovino has been on the
Speaker 2: podcast circuit. Talked to one of my friends, Kevin Deanna
Speaker 2: just the other night. Listen to that and uh, at
Speaker 2: least according to the guy in the room, it's not happening.
Speaker 1: It's not happening nearly as much as somewhat have you believe,
Speaker 1: and look, sure it's better than nothing. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to pretend that we'd be better with you know, Kamala
Speaker 1: in office. Far from it. But sorry, man, I'm not
Speaker 1: giving you credit for the largest in history.
Speaker 2: Yeah, here's some fucking menstruating faggot on my timeline telling
Speaker 2: me that, no, no, they're really doing this when the
Speaker 2: fucking guy that was in charge of it, who got
Speaker 2: fired replaced by a Jewish guy that tried to push amnesty,
Speaker 2: this guy is telling you know it's actually not happening.
Speaker 2: I think I'm going to take his word over, you know.
Speaker 2: I don't know the next guy to tell me I'm
Speaker 2: trooning out or whatever. This is a big failure the administration,
Speaker 2: and I think it's great what Bovino's doing. I hope
Speaker 2: he really I hope he doesn't even slow I hope
Speaker 2: he doesn't slow down, and he probably has a political
Speaker 2: career ahead of him, even a paramilitary career who knows.
Speaker 1: Here's hoping she's a number three is easy. I feel
Speaker 1: like we don't even need to discuss this. End inflation
Speaker 1: and make America affordable again. Maybe we need to say
Speaker 1: that that isn't working, dude. I was seeing that stated
Speaker 1: inflation this year is four point three percent. We've had
Speaker 1: conversations I think our last conversation or maybe that was cars,
Speaker 1: whichever one of our last couple about one, how that
Speaker 1: rate is manipulated and calculated or two I ask you
Speaker 1: to pull out a receipt from the last time you
Speaker 1: went to the grocery store and asked me if inflation
Speaker 1: has been ended anyway.
Speaker 2: No point to give something useful to people that listen
Speaker 2: to the show, because there really isn't much in it.
Speaker 2: That is, it's not for Jay's lack to try. And
Speaker 2: inflation is going to be ten percent by the end
Speaker 2: of the year, and it's going to be fifteen percent
Speaker 2: by summer of twenty twenty seven. This is a fire,
Speaker 2: you gay, It's it's baked into the math. They're going
Speaker 2: to lie and they're saying it's four. They'll probably even
Speaker 2: admit that it's five. But if you if you were
Speaker 2: sitting on cash right now, you need to move it
Speaker 2: into something else, any type of assets. Don't put it
Speaker 2: in stocks. If you're like I can't give financial advice
Speaker 2: on the podcast, but just know that that's baked in
Speaker 2: like that's going to happen. So from now till Christmas,
Speaker 2: your money's going to lose ten percent of its value.
Speaker 2: By summer of next year, it's going to be fifteen,
Speaker 2: maybe seventeen. This is going to happen. No matter what
Speaker 2: happens in the straight of horm moves, the damage is
Speaker 2: already done. It's the interest rates, right, doesn't matter if
Speaker 2: Trump closes the fucking straight opens a straight doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: Bond yields are what's driving this, and the bond yields
Speaker 2: the market doesn't believe in, regardless of whatever they do
Speaker 2: with the oil price.
Speaker 1: Well, and that's sort of the thing that I've been
Speaker 1: interested in. I'm looking to keep making progress because you
Speaker 1: and I clearly can talk for at least an hour
Speaker 1: about the economy. But I was always wondering how long
Speaker 1: it would take for the market to stop believing Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: because at least through the first couple weeks of the
Speaker 1: Iran War, every time we heard the oh, peace talks
Speaker 1: are in motion, We're almost done, the market would rally.
Speaker 1: And look, maybe I'm more cynical than average, but Wall
Speaker 1: Street guys aren't dumb, and at no like the fifteenth
Speaker 1: rug pull I was just waiting. I was like screaming
Speaker 1: at the sky. Why are they still listening.
Speaker 2: They're not listening. They're being strong armed. They don't really
Speaker 2: have a choice, right if you control the regulatory apparatus.
Speaker 2: The SEC is entirely selective, and four has been for
Speaker 2: fifty years since it was created. And yeah, it's from
Speaker 2: what I have heard, it has been said in no
Speaker 2: uncertain terms to market makers, you are going to fucking
Speaker 2: do this right like, because basically you can. You can
Speaker 2: control a lot of the flows just by three or
Speaker 2: four pension fund managers and a couple of major investment banks.
Speaker 2: As far as oil goes, that's another manipulation, but that's
Speaker 2: a story for another day. The insider and trading that
Speaker 2: you're seeing is basically them recouping the amount of money
Speaker 2: that they're losing to suppress the price of oil.
Speaker 1: All right, So number four, Stormy meek America the dominant
Speaker 1: energy producer in the world by far. So I don't
Speaker 1: know anything about energy policy. I realized that there is
Speaker 1: at least some amount or a large amount of exporting
Speaker 1: going on.
Speaker 2: He fucking cheated. If you ncap everyone else, then yes,
Speaker 2: we're the largest, which is effectively. What's happening.
Speaker 1: I guess that's a half point right, sort of a
Speaker 1: monkey's paw esque situation. Yeah, okay, we're gonna have point
Speaker 1: in the interest of fairness, I guess, stop outsourcing and
Speaker 1: turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower. This is
Speaker 1: that happen at all. The outsourcing, particularly as regards tech,
Speaker 1: has been apocalyptic. We've seen this over and over and
Speaker 1: over again, companies firing off American workers and particularly hiring
Speaker 1: you cheap replacements in India. This is a failure.
Speaker 2: After with him in the White House, IBM, yes, get
Speaker 2: this major fucking contract, meets with President Trump, Hanshakes lays
Speaker 2: off seventy thousand workers and all outsources one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty thousand jobs to India. Then next week FedEx see
Speaker 2: Indian CEO meets with Donald Trump. They take pictures the
Speaker 2: very next day, sixty thousand workers. So not only is
Speaker 2: he not doing it, he is allowing him to be
Speaker 2: made a fool of by these executives. He's literally not
Speaker 2: pushed back at all.
Speaker 1: So we're going to count that as a miss. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, can we do well? If we were doing that,
Speaker 1: this would be a very boring podcast to me just
Speaker 1: be a score of zero, which, well, you know it
Speaker 1: does accurately reflect my emotions. We've got to keep up
Speaker 1: the gimmick at least for a little longer. Okay, large
Speaker 1: tax cuts for workers, no tax on tips. I think
Speaker 1: the no tax on tips things that actually passed as
Speaker 1: far as I'm aware.
Speaker 2: Right, it was the only tax cut for workers. And
Speaker 2: a tax on tips is only for two years. Right,
Speaker 2: by twenty twenty eight, you're getting tax on your tips again. Bro, Sorry,
Speaker 2: it could. We have to give it into law. It's
Speaker 2: just a temporary thing, just like we'll just give them
Speaker 2: the plubs this and they'll be really surprised. But I'll
Speaker 2: be out of here by then, all right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess technically that's something. It's some credit.
Speaker 1: I guess this is not shaping up well. By the way,
Speaker 1: for the.
Speaker 2: Tax breaks, that didn't happen. Yeah, but the attack on
Speaker 2: tips did half a point?
Speaker 1: Yeah, defend well, it kind of happened. Whatever. We're desperate here.
Speaker 1: We're looking to get anything we can defend our Constitution,
Speaker 1: our Bill of Rights, and our fundamental freedoms, including freedom
Speaker 1: of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to keep
Speaker 1: in bear arms. So on the last point, the right
Speaker 1: to bear arms, this is actually something that Trump administration
Speaker 1: has done a good job on. So for instance, the
Speaker 1: DOJ has announced their intention to fight the Virginia assault
Speaker 1: weapons ban. The ATF released a tranch of different suggestions
Speaker 1: things they were pondering, you know, to change in law.
Speaker 1: This is some reforms to the NFA system which were
Speaker 1: much needed. Obviously, you have the removal of the two
Speaker 1: hundred dollars tax stamp which passed. Then also some changes
Speaker 1: to how guns are sold, for instance, paving the way
Speaker 1: for direct to home sales for qualified buyers. So at
Speaker 1: least on that front, I think it's that's a win. Uh. Now,
Speaker 1: on to freedom speech and freedom of religion, we've seen
Speaker 1: a lot of action on anti Semitism, but to be fair,
Speaker 1: most of that hasn't been federal. A lot of that's
Speaker 1: been state level. So again, at least on the face
Speaker 1: of it, I'm willing to give a full point for
Speaker 1: this one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because I mean it clearly states in the Constitution
Speaker 2: that the exemption for freedom of speech is the nation
Speaker 2: of Israel, like I've read.
Speaker 1: It, Yes, but I mean as far as like a
Speaker 1: pure like legislation standpoint, those people were right to be
Speaker 1: justified or right to be angry about that, and we
Speaker 1: will certainly get to that later in this uh later
Speaker 1: in this series of promises, but purely judging on the
Speaker 1: executive level, that's a winning YE book. Okay, all right,
Speaker 1: this this is where things really go off the rail.
Speaker 1: Number eight. Prevent world War three technically hasn't happened, restore
Speaker 1: peace in Europe and in the Middle East, and build
Speaker 1: a great iron dome missile defense shield over our entire country,
Speaker 1: all made in America. Yeah, that's a zero. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: know world War three technically has it broken out? But
Speaker 1: come on, man, like this is not going good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all the Yeah, that's that's a zero because you're
Speaker 2: basically getting all the downstream effects of World War three.
Speaker 1: Yeah, without technically labeling it world War three.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like, I mean, I haven't been drafted yet. I guess
Speaker 1: there's that. But like by any other metric, we are
Speaker 1: in a globe spanning conflict with consequences felt in every
Speaker 1: country in the world.
Speaker 2: Yep. And it wasn't. And not only did you not
Speaker 2: restore peace to the Middle East, but every single Middle
Speaker 2: Eastern country has received some type of you know, Ordinance
Speaker 2: except for except for Oman, So the tiniest country in
Speaker 2: the Middle East didn't get shell or missile, but every
Speaker 2: single other one from fucking Libya to Lebanon to Iraq,
Speaker 2: Like I mean, Middle East is on fire.
Speaker 1: And honestly, with with Oman, you got to wonder if
Speaker 1: it's just my virtue of being too small to hit.
Speaker 1: You know that given enough time, something will land there,
Speaker 1: you know, just makind of the random block of it
Speaker 1: for no real reason. They're just two clothes.
Speaker 2: Right now, I think Trump is threatening to hit I
Speaker 2: RAN's power UH power generation capabilities, which I believe they
Speaker 2: said last time they would respond to UH with hitting
Speaker 2: the which they've generally left alone. They've left the oil
Speaker 2: infrastructure in the oil producing countries alone up until this point.
Speaker 2: And I believe last night when Trump was threatening this,
Speaker 2: they said the counter their counter value strike will be
Speaker 2: all of the oil infrastructure. And like Saudi and uh,
Speaker 2: EUAE and Kutar, so that will be bad.
Speaker 1: I just want to say, Stormy, you picked a phenomenal
Speaker 1: time to offload your thirty year old vehicle that gets
Speaker 1: thirteen miles to the gallon with a tailwind to someone else. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and he's a sucker, Yeah, just a moron mouth breather. Really,
Speaker 1: I saw him coming a mile away. End the weaponization
Speaker 1: of government against the American people. So there was recently,
Speaker 1: of course, this sort of slush fund that was that
Speaker 1: I think has been disrailed. Was it the Judiciary or
Speaker 1: the Senate that actually, uh, sort of threw a wrench
Speaker 1: in that?
Speaker 2: Do you remember the parliamentarian? So basically, yeah, the unelected
Speaker 2: appointee that Congress can literally just pretend doesn't exist, but
Speaker 2: does pretend they exist whenever they don't want to do
Speaker 2: something but don't want to not do the thing themselves.
Speaker 2: Oh no, the parliamentarian saying no, yes, that means we can't. Guys.
Speaker 2: I think it was the parliamentarian and that took it out.
Speaker 2: I can't remember something happened with it in the House.
Speaker 1: So here's what I will say. Given the fact that
Speaker 1: the Community Relations Service is done, and that we've seen
Speaker 1: a lot less of these sort of like FBI raids
Speaker 1: on our guys, like abortion protesters and stuff like that,
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's ended. But to be fair,
Speaker 1: the presence doesn't seem nearly as aggressive as it was
Speaker 1: under Biden, So I don't quite want to give full
Speaker 1: credit because obviously the main piece of legislation failed, but
Speaker 1: at the same time, like that was put forward, an
Speaker 1: attempt was made. So I'm almost I'm leaning towards giving
Speaker 1: a full point because you.
Speaker 2: Know, also the do O Jagman, the DJ just said
Speaker 2: it's no longer a desperate impact.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you know what, again, we're desperate for points here,
Speaker 1: but we'll be generous Stormy. You know, we're magnanimous liberal fellows.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Okay. Here's another one that's gonna be tough. Stop the
Speaker 1: migrant crime epidemic, demolish foreign drug cartels, crush gang violence,
Speaker 1: and lock up violent offenders. No, that's that's not worked.
Speaker 2: No, he did go after the cartel though, but I
Speaker 2: mean they're still going.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the migrant crime epidemic. Look, literally, any time you
Speaker 1: open any social media app you see it. So again, right,
Speaker 1: like there has been there has been progress along that line,
Speaker 1: but like its exactly right, like this was always going
Speaker 1: to be a difficult thing to do. So sorry, Bud,
Speaker 1: we're not giving you points for that, right, it's it's
Speaker 1: it's not work. Uh, okay, here's another one. I think
Speaker 1: that there's there's an argument for rebuild our cities, including Washington,
Speaker 1: d C, making them safe, clean and beautiful. Again, as
Speaker 1: someone who lives not near DC but within you know,
Speaker 1: kind of a day's driving distance of it, but I
Speaker 1: will say DC is remarkably better than it was. There
Speaker 1: really no homeless people. The National Guard are doing a lot.
Speaker 1: You can look at the crime rate in DC has
Speaker 1: gone down precipitously. And again, not looking to give the
Speaker 1: guy too much credit, but it seems like Donald Trump
Speaker 1: kind of understands how to do real estate renovations, because
Speaker 1: you know what, like the okay, the two fifty celebrations
Speaker 1: are kind of ridiculous, but there are many things in
Speaker 1: d C which are nicer than they used to be.
Speaker 1: Like there have been a kind of going around fixing
Speaker 1: fountains and stuff which I realized, Look, I would happily
Speaker 1: trade a kind of crummy capital city for a sensible
Speaker 1: foreign policy or a country run for the benefit of
Speaker 1: my people. But you know what, on that one issue,
Speaker 1: I think it's full credit.
Speaker 2: YEP. I got into a bit of a stepped on
Speaker 2: a bit of a source buy yesterday on Acts when
Speaker 2: I said, like, yeah, I'm not really too excited to
Speaker 2: about the two hundred and fiftieth kind of killed it.
Speaker 2: It seems like it's for boomers and celebrating fixing a
Speaker 2: fountain I think is cringey. Yeah, but it didn't fix it.
Speaker 2: It's fixed exactly.
Speaker 1: It's like that's a if you had to pick one
Speaker 1: of these twenty promises to be fulfilled, this would never
Speaker 1: be your first choice, probably not even the top half.
Speaker 1: Like it doesn't really matter, but it's something you know. Again,
Speaker 1: and judging by how this is going currently, I won't
Speaker 1: spoil it, Stormy. Uh, We're gonna need everything we can
Speaker 1: to try and escape by with a C. So this
Speaker 1: is one where I'm gonna lean on your expertise. Number thirteen.
Speaker 1: Keep the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. How's
Speaker 1: that going, Stormy?
Speaker 2: Not great. You can judge this by the amount of
Speaker 2: gold in foreign central bank holdings, which for the very
Speaker 2: first time, I think, like I was two months ago,
Speaker 2: has now surpassed gold. So every central bank in the
Speaker 2: world is either currently or in the process of filling
Speaker 2: their vaults with gold at the expense of treasuries. So
Speaker 2: the foreign banks, they seem to be not trusting treasuries
Speaker 2: that much, so de facto now it's coming apart. It
Speaker 2: needs to cap part. This was the dumbest thing in
Speaker 2: the world, right, This was the dumbest point. Right. The
Speaker 2: world reserve currency has been a disaster for the United
Speaker 2: States because we have to basically provide liquidity for the world. Right,
Speaker 2: if somebody wants to make a rice transaction in Indonesia, well,
Speaker 2: if we're the world reserve currency, he's got to do
Speaker 2: He's got to do it in dollars. Okay, that means
Speaker 2: you have to print more dollars. So the debasement of
Speaker 2: our currency that's happened from nineteen seventy nineteen really nineteen
Speaker 2: sixty onwards is a direct result of being the world
Speaker 2: reserve currency. And the thing, more than anything else is
Speaker 2: the outsourcing of jobs and globalization because if everyone is
Speaker 2: transacting in dollars, then it doesn't matter if your factories
Speaker 2: in Hong Kong or fucking Bangladesh right where. It removes
Speaker 2: the barriers and the constraints for people in capital, for
Speaker 2: people to move capital and capital equipment elsewhere. So the
Speaker 2: dollar reserve currency is why globalization exists. The dollar reserve
Speaker 2: currency is so like on shoring jobs and all that shit,
Speaker 2: and then saying you're gonna keep the dollar reserve currency
Speaker 2: and defend it means you don't know what you're fucking
Speaker 2: talking about. So I wish you'd let it die. Luckily,
Speaker 2: it's he is killing it by accident.
Speaker 1: Which is sort of the And we can bring this
Speaker 1: up more in the conclusion, but it sort of is.
Speaker 1: The great irony of Donald J. Trump is that he
Speaker 1: has brought about many of the necessary changes. He attempted
Speaker 1: to delay it that way. And then one more point
Speaker 1: on the reserve currency. The and obviously there's a blockade,
Speaker 1: but what has the Iranian government requested as the denomination
Speaker 1: as the currency to be used in uh paying their
Speaker 1: toll to get through the state of Hormooes, Like, what
Speaker 1: currency are they using to facilitate that?
Speaker 2: Bitcoin?
Speaker 1: Hm? Libertarians were right, I guess.
Speaker 2: I think it's like bitcoin. They're also doing oil purchases
Speaker 2: and Chinese wong m hm. So not the dollar, no, no,
Speaker 2: And the Wong is like a joke currency. No one
Speaker 2: can trades in wong because the Chinese government lies about everything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's just debased tactically at a moment's notice,
Speaker 1: as far as I understand.
Speaker 2: Exactly, So settling oil transaction and Wan is literally just
Speaker 2: then giving a finger to the US like, ha, fuck you.
Speaker 2: We'd rather have China's currency than yours.
Speaker 1: So stormy. This next one a plus, just absolute home run,
Speaker 1: fight for and protect social security and medicare with no cuts,
Speaker 1: including no changes the retirement age. We got one boys,
Speaker 1: no qualifiers on this one. Boomer luxury communism forever. This
Speaker 1: will never change.
Speaker 2: It's going to run out by twenty thirty two. So
Speaker 2: don't worry. Your kids won't even know what social security is.
Speaker 2: In fact, they will have no social security, no safety net,
Speaker 2: and they'll never have to worry about whether a president
Speaker 2: secures social security or not. It's actually, you know, in
Speaker 2: a positive note, it's just it'll just be one last
Speaker 2: thing we have to worry about because none of this
Speaker 2: is going to be there for us. It's going to
Speaker 2: be you know, kind of reduces the stress of things.
Speaker 1: But you have to give him credit. He sure hasn't
Speaker 1: made any change to boomer welfare. And you know what
Speaker 1: when a man called the shots like that, when a
Speaker 1: man says, you know what, I know you.
Speaker 2: Oh wait, I forgot work. There was a big tax cut.
Speaker 2: Oh there was not taxing social security. Yes, the big
Speaker 2: the big tax cut was forth of fucking boomers.
Speaker 1: How how could I forget? He made my math and
Speaker 1: my math I mean me remembering what we talked about
Speaker 1: twenty minutes ago. Too hard to add that in. But
Speaker 1: you know what, full marks for eternal boomer welfare. Uh,
Speaker 1: that's the one thing I feel like we can say
Speaker 1: with no qualifiers, this man.
Speaker 2: Is done except for the ones that live past twenty
Speaker 2: thirty two. But Donald Trump will No, I don't mean it.
Speaker 2: I don't mean it that. I don't mean it that
Speaker 2: way because he's kind of old. So, like, you know,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is doing the thing that all the boomers say, like, oh,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to.
Speaker 1: Be around here for that problem. Sorry kids, white literally whatever.
Speaker 1: So another core promise strengthen and modernize our military, making it,
Speaker 1: without question the strongest and most powerful in the world.
Speaker 1: This is this is an O for me.
Speaker 2: I think I ran through that to the world. Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 2: we have to be We're not even biased.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean the most powerful military in the world
Speaker 1: would not be in this situation we are. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that that means that China or Russia is better
Speaker 1: than us, but uh, if you measure a military by
Speaker 1: its ability to I don't know who achieve its goals. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's not working out great. Let alone the supply
Speaker 1: chain stuff, right, the ability to simply even arm itself.
Speaker 2: Now And I've actually heard from a friend of mine
Speaker 2: is commands a ranger regiment in based in Germany, and
Speaker 2: he kind of tells me like what the state of
Speaker 2: the art of training is, and US forces are just like, so,
Speaker 2: remember when like drones drones first started, like you know,
Speaker 2: even in like the even prior to the Ukraine War
Speaker 2: kicking off, it was what was at Albania and Azerbaijan
Speaker 2: was like the first really heavy drone warfare conflict, and
Speaker 2: that consisted of like drones that just dropped hand grenades
Speaker 2: like little claw machines. All right, that's where we're at
Speaker 2: right now. So our current state of the art training
Speaker 2: on drones involves how well a you know, soldier can
Speaker 2: drop a tennis ball on another soldier. And while the
Speaker 2: enemy is using FPV drones that are you know, super fast,
Speaker 2: super maneuverable. Oh and they're on fiber optic cables and
Speaker 2: can't get jent. Like we're not even at the FPV stage.
Speaker 2: So guys are literally looking on a screen trying to
Speaker 2: drop something on another guy like it's we're really behind
Speaker 2: in drones, which matters more than fighter's. Sorry.
Speaker 1: Well, and to add to that, I mean, just look
Speaker 1: at the debacle surrounding either the new M seventeen M
Speaker 1: eighteen pistol, which seems to have the charming feature of
Speaker 1: randomly going off, or the sig M seven rifle, which
Speaker 1: is a host of issues technical, logistical, and economic. Right,
Speaker 1: it's it's absurdly expensive, uh in India, Yes, which is
Speaker 1: a really Uh that's stormy.
Speaker 2: Known further metal.
Speaker 1: Sure those people are this is unrelated to what you
Speaker 1: just said. There's no bearing whatsoever on it. Do you
Speaker 1: remember the name of the CEO of sig Usa.
Speaker 2: I was about to say, I think it's Cohen. That's weird,
Speaker 2: all right, prom This is the reason I was thinking
Speaker 2: that maybe the M seventeen would like randomly go off.
Speaker 2: I just figured it was some type of goy lot.
Speaker 1: They got the same people to make it that made
Speaker 1: those pagers in Lebanon.
Speaker 2: Yes, Uh, that's that's fucking fun. Donald Trump phone just
Speaker 2: came out, by the way, everyone thought it was like,
Speaker 2: you know, a scam. He's delivered like one hundred phones like, yeah,
Speaker 2: he's made sure this is kept. Yeah, and if you
Speaker 2: type anything anti semitic on it, you lose your fingers off.
Speaker 1: Benjamin Netta, who personally delivered Donald Trump a gold Trump
Speaker 1: phone suspiciously shaped like a suitcase nuke.
Speaker 2: I President Benjamin Netanyahoo delivered Vice President trunk.
Speaker 1: Of Okay number fifteen. Cancel the electric vehicle mandate and
Speaker 1: cuss cut costly and burdens some regulations. Honestly, the auto
Speaker 1: stuff has been relatively positive. I think a lot of
Speaker 1: those changes have been for the better. It's, you know,
Speaker 1: not necessarily what we want. But I didn't think we
Speaker 1: were going to see anything on this front, and we've
Speaker 1: seen a decent amount of it.
Speaker 2: Yep. And I love all of these manufacturers having to
Speaker 2: suddenly like pivot their terrible ev lines that.
Speaker 1: They were Toyota vindicated again.
Speaker 2: Yepw you follow it more than I did. Have they
Speaker 2: ring any regulation changes around diesel or do we still
Speaker 2: make diesel engines commit suicide?
Speaker 1: I don't know off the top of my head. I
Speaker 1: know there was in conversation maybe two or three months ago,
Speaker 1: but off I cannot remember. Let me let me just
Speaker 1: like that.
Speaker 2: I will go out and I will buy a new
Speaker 2: diesel truck if at the moment that happens, because it
Speaker 2: will last for a million years.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's that's true. The EPF or the EPA
Speaker 1: excuse me, removed requirements for DF and got rid of
Speaker 1: n O two limits, which the n O two limit
Speaker 1: is actually another big thing. Uh So for those who
Speaker 1: aren't massive autists, there are sort of different ways people
Speaker 1: can go around making a greener engine. You can either
Speaker 1: focus on emissions or efficiency, and that's kind of an
Speaker 1: either or so. For instance, Chrysler in the late nineties
Speaker 1: had a really innovative two stroke three cylinder program that
Speaker 1: was very very efficient put out, like I think out
Speaker 1: of like a liter and a half like two hundred
Speaker 1: horsepower and two twenty pound feet of torquehich is impressive
Speaker 1: for an engine of that size. Yeah, it was crazy.
Speaker 1: It was in the look up the jeep Eco concept
Speaker 1: it was. It featured that same two stroke this really weird. Yeah, Like,
Speaker 1: for instance, it was like a single piece there was
Speaker 1: no head and no block. But the reason it got
Speaker 1: killed it was very efficient, great driving engine was because
Speaker 1: it ran super hot. Because it was a two stroke
Speaker 1: put out too much too much particular right put out
Speaker 1: too much n ox. So point is this being taken
Speaker 1: away is actually really cool. And uh yeah, DEF sensors
Speaker 1: are no longer required, which is awesome.
Speaker 2: That's really really cool. A Jeep is doing a rerangular
Speaker 2: in diesel, which is the first motor in that car,
Speaker 2: since like the straight six that makes sense, like a
Speaker 2: four cylinder diesel is what that thing should run on.
Speaker 2: Like if if that if now, if what Jay is
Speaker 2: saying actually goes into effect, manufacturers actually pull off all
Speaker 2: the d E stuff fu a Jeep wrangler with you know,
Speaker 2: a four cylinder diesel without any bullshit, like it's you
Speaker 2: won't need anything else, Like it's an all purpose like
Speaker 2: go anywhere, sit fuel Like that'll be really freaking cool.
Speaker 2: I would I would have a d like a wranguler
Speaker 2: in a diesel.
Speaker 1: So two other things, the dj IS stopped per suing
Speaker 1: charges and fines for people who sell diesel delete or
Speaker 1: like DEF delete kits. And they've also reaffirmed that farmers
Speaker 1: and operators have the right to repair their DEF and
Speaker 1: emission systems without voiding warranties. So that's another big win.
Speaker 1: So again credit where credits do that is a win.
Speaker 1: Yeah again, well we'll take it. Cut federal funding for
Speaker 1: any school pushing CRT, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual,
Speaker 1: or political content in our children. That's been a failure.
Speaker 1: That just didn't happen.
Speaker 2: As a judge said, so right, it got.
Speaker 1: Pulled into judicial Hell, there were the fights with Harvard
Speaker 1: early on, but that didn't go anywhere quite simply. Even
Speaker 1: if you know, there was the regulation around the words
Speaker 1: like CRT critic race theory. Yeah, they literally just changed
Speaker 1: the terms. This didn't happen.
Speaker 2: Sorry, this is a problem with like the boomer's conception
Speaker 2: of politic like this, this is like, oh, but these
Speaker 2: guys are doing Marxism, all right, Well now we're not
Speaker 2: calling it Marxism, and like they just totally forget about it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's it's the same thing as oh, Hitler was
Speaker 1: a Liberal Democrat because this party said socialist in it.
Speaker 1: It's like, okay, yeah, man, not that important.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're doing Nazism now we're just not calling it socialist.
Speaker 2: So I guess you gotta be okay with it.
Speaker 1: I am stormy. Are you aware? I don't know, if
Speaker 1: you know, it's pretty cutting edge.
Speaker 2: Is freaking cool dude, why did you send me down
Speaker 2: this rabbit hole?
Speaker 1: I know they were like three generations. It was a
Speaker 1: real like they really put work into it.
Speaker 2: Why did you do this to me? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I told you everything cool is illegal. That's just the conclusion.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: But Stormy, I'm not sure if you're aware this is
Speaker 1: pretty cutting edge political analysis. Uh were you aware that
Speaker 1: that Democrats are the real racist?
Speaker 2: Wait? What?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not. I have an inkling. I think if
Speaker 1: I'm not mistaken that, Uh the Democrats were the party
Speaker 1: of the KKK that many of the people in white
Speaker 1: hoods were Democrats.
Speaker 2: Zoltan Blue. Now no matter who? All right?
Speaker 1: Uh, keep men out of women's sports. Uh, I've followed
Speaker 1: this super closely. Who cares?
Speaker 2: But understand sports?
Speaker 1: Yeah that this actually has generally worked. I know that,
Speaker 1: like the collegiate programs have been forced to make changes.
Speaker 1: I don't care is the answer. Uh? Title nine is stupid.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't be funding like women's badmintons teams in the
Speaker 1: same way we do like state like championship winning college
Speaker 1: football teams. That's dumb, But uh, a point is a point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny that the ones that are hitting are
Speaker 2: literally just the boomer slop stuff something exactly. They they
Speaker 2: don't understand that the voter base doesn't understand what matters
Speaker 2: and what doesn't like. It's the most frustrating.
Speaker 1: Go on, deport pro Hamas radicals and make our college
Speaker 1: campuses safe and patriotic again. The first clause, I think,
Speaker 1: who anyway? Exactly right? Seemingly, that is entirely possible to
Speaker 1: be deported from this country if you're pro Hamas. There
Speaker 1: was a Columbia student. I think who got got that
Speaker 1: everyone was all upset about. But the second part, college
Speaker 1: campus is safe in patriotic I mean, that's laughable, dude,
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk got shot at college campus. Like, no, these
Speaker 1: are not safe in patriotic places. But if you talk
Speaker 1: about Hamas and you are not from this country on
Speaker 1: a college campus, you will get deported. So I think
Speaker 1: on the on the technical level, that's half a.
Speaker 2: Point matters to a large swath of the electorate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, why, I'd say about two percent give or take. Oh, this,
Speaker 1: this one's tough. These these last couple secure our elections,
Speaker 1: including same day voting, voter identification, paper ballots, and proof
Speaker 1: of citizenship. How's that going? Stormy?
Speaker 2: Badly?
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean you have the you have the LA mayor's
Speaker 1: election where some random third party leftist woman magically gets
Speaker 1: a truckload of votes in the middle of the night
Speaker 1: to knock out Spencer Pratt.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, and all those votes are going to
Speaker 2: disappear and they're just gonna get the same black woman
Speaker 2: in the in the runoff.
Speaker 1: Watch. Yeah, I mean there have been some arrests for
Speaker 1: voter fraud at like the very small level. A lot
Speaker 1: of this is like local election stuff, particularly in like
Speaker 1: places like weirdly like Maryland. There's a ton of corruption
Speaker 1: in local elections, but realistically, no one has actually faced
Speaker 1: any real consequences for this at all. This isn't is
Speaker 1: an abject failure. Sorry, it didn't work, And I get it.
Speaker 1: You know, the Save Act would have been awesome, but
Speaker 1: that didn't happen. Didn't work. And the idea that, oh, well,
Speaker 1: we'll give them the war and Iran and at least
Speaker 1: then we'll get the Save Act I didn't work either.
Speaker 2: Oh wait wait wait rat, so I was can I've
Speaker 2: been told repeatedly that if you just do whatever a
Speaker 2: certain demographic want, you win. I think that just with Jews,
Speaker 2: you win.
Speaker 1: Democrats are the real racists. With Jews, you win. We're
Speaker 1: coming up with a powerful, entirely unique political formula here, Stormy.
Speaker 1: I think we've got it. I think that with like
Speaker 1: a moderate, potentially Mormon presidential candidate on these two issues,
Speaker 1: we could copy the stunning success of Mitt Romney and
Speaker 1: that would fix everything.
Speaker 2: We just have to go back to being civilized. M
Speaker 2: We have to go back to being you know, polite.
Speaker 2: We need to we need polite politics. We need to
Speaker 2: work what this is.
Speaker 1: What those guys in Belfast don't understand that if they
Speaker 1: just stopped burning down migrant hotels and politely asked them
Speaker 1: to go away, the problem would be would be solved.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Literally, Mike Pence just showing us the way.
Speaker 1: Right you You just need to walk in to that
Speaker 1: migrant hostel the collar shirt on, give him a fir handshake,
Speaker 1: because that's what works for me. That's what works for me.
Speaker 1: You got to get out of here, pal, all right?
Speaker 1: Uh So the final one unite our country by bringing
Speaker 1: it to a new and record level of success. Uh
Speaker 1: I just think it's safe to say no points for that.
Speaker 2: No, No, there's not all uniting going on on the election.
Speaker 2: Integrity stuff or lack there of. I did an interesting
Speaker 2: episode of the Inquisition recently with Carl Thahl, and we
Speaker 2: just go into I basically list who is behind all
Speaker 2: of the prominent political figures you know, over the past
Speaker 2: like thirty years, from congressmen to senators to our current
Speaker 2: Secretary of State, previous presidents. Turns out it's all Jewish
Speaker 2: organized crime that like actual mobsters. So if you think
Speaker 2: that the people that do organize crime, like international organized crime,
Speaker 2: are not going to cheat in elections, come on, there's
Speaker 2: a reason why the savac's not going to get passed.
Speaker 2: There's a reason why, you know, what happens in LA
Speaker 2: is going to always happen because these people. I mean,
Speaker 2: how much did LA spend on homelessness last year?
Speaker 1: I know, like basically like the entire GDP of Burkina,
Speaker 1: Fosso or something.
Speaker 2: It's fifteen billion dollars. They can't account for any of it.
Speaker 2: It literally just disappears every year, fifteen billion dollars you know,
Speaker 2: to home to quote unquote homelessness, and it just disappears
Speaker 2: into the ether. That that high speed rail that's what
Speaker 2: like one hundred billion dollars that has been completed a
Speaker 2: whopping like eight feet in twenty years. Like okay, so
Speaker 2: it's too, it's too. It's you know, really a two
Speaker 2: pronged thing. It's like a we get to we get
Speaker 2: through you know, organized corruption to siphon. Oh and the
Speaker 2: Medicare medicaid fraud. There's like one hundred billion dollars that was,
Speaker 2: you know, just in that type of fraud that got
Speaker 2: sucked out of California annually. Okay, So like at what point,
Speaker 2: like forget the fact that like the the political people
Speaker 2: that you put in there don't do any of the
Speaker 2: criminal enforcement for all your other criminal like rackets that
Speaker 2: you're doing, like dealing drugs or whatever you're doing. Right, Like,
Speaker 2: so not only did the police leave you alone and
Speaker 2: you can operate that way, you also get like two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty billion dollars a year from the other
Speaker 2: type of like government corrupt Like we're talking like five
Speaker 2: hundred six hundred billion dollars worth of illicit money. Like
Speaker 2: at what what, Jay, what would you not do? Like
Speaker 2: is there like a line you wouldn't cross to Let's say,
Speaker 2: keep your five hundred you're half a trillion dollar a
Speaker 2: year criminal enterprise going.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, you're aware of all the degrading and
Speaker 1: embarrassing things I've done to keep my moderately successful substack growing. Yes,
Speaker 1: so you throw five hundred billion in and there's no
Speaker 1: sucking that is on the table. I suck it, bick,
Speaker 1: I would say, I would interject this out of out
Speaker 1: of curiosity, you know, I said, Oh, it's probably the
Speaker 1: GDP of Burkina Fosso. I was actually pretty close, did
Speaker 1: FASO is only twenty two billion dollars, which is pretty
Speaker 1: close in the grand scheme of things.
Speaker 2: I wonder how many African nation states get sucked out
Speaker 2: every year? How many African nation states of GDP does
Speaker 2: it take to get to like, let's say, I don't know,
Speaker 2: let's lowball and say two hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 1: Uh that that's that will require more math I'm willing
Speaker 1: to do on cameras.
Speaker 2: Oh, never mind, forget it. Anyways, you'll not only will
Speaker 2: you murder people, but you know, if you're you know,
Speaker 2: trafficking large amounts of narcotics. I'm sure rigging an election
Speaker 2: isn't outside your moral bounds, but you damn sure will
Speaker 2: do it to stay in power. Like you're dealing with
Speaker 2: criminals like actual legit criminals. Nancy Pelosi, the third most
Speaker 2: powerful players, like literally the third most powerful person in
Speaker 2: the American government for fucking fifteen years is the daughter
Speaker 2: of probably the most famous mob guy in Baltimore. Oh
Speaker 2: so like his the daughter of a fame of like
Speaker 2: a notorious mobster is now in charge of California. Oh
Speaker 2: the meg like you know you were talking about like
Speaker 2: in your previous episode, you touched on it a little
Speaker 2: bit with your episode with Thomas. You were talking about
Speaker 2: like the massy thing no, and and and you also
Speaker 2: were talking about like Ron Ron Dodson and two. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and they're like, oh, well, these are all these other
Speaker 2: reasons that Massey could have lost the election. That's not
Speaker 2: necessarily Jewish money. Uh as mister as our favorite political commentator,
Speaker 2: Mark Levin says.
Speaker 1: Okay, story, I have an answer to your question of
Speaker 1: how many African nations it would it would take to
Speaker 1: reach two hundred and fifty billion dollars. The answer is
Speaker 1: it's actually the twelve largest countries, or twelve of the
Speaker 1: larger countries in Africa. It is Benien, Chad, Niger, Gabone, Mozambique, Botswana, Madagascar, Malawi, Rwanda, Nambia,
Speaker 1: Maritreas and the Republic of Congo. Just gets you just.
Speaker 2: Under Doulie, that's what's happening. Maybe that's where the two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifteen billion is going. Maybe we're maybe we're
Speaker 2: doing African welfare in Africa.
Speaker 1: Now, this is what we call, I think vertical integration story.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: So it's funny you bring up Mark Levin because I
Speaker 1: want to read a long post from today that came
Speaker 1: from Mark Levin. And I realized the last episode you
Speaker 1: and I did was gloating, but I didn't realize how
Speaker 1: justified you and I would prove to be because the
Speaker 1: final paragraph of this is literally exactly what we said.
Speaker 1: So talking about the Israel Iran war proportionate response is
Speaker 1: Jimmy Carter language. The Iranian regime will never give up
Speaker 1: its nukes, no matter what they say or sign. We
Speaker 1: must be honest with ourselves. Time will prove me right
Speaker 1: and others who understand this. It's now or likely never.
Speaker 1: If we cannot remove the uranium, then seriously consider contaminating
Speaker 1: the site so no one could go anywhere near them
Speaker 1: for one hundred years of more. Any further delays in
Speaker 1: taking out this regime and that includes arming the people,
Speaker 1: will result in both unforseeable and predictable consequences that will
Speaker 1: be severe and constant for US, our allies in the
Speaker 1: West generally sidebar This guy can't write to save his life.
Speaker 1: If not immediately, then over time, no amount of negative
Speaker 1: pr campaigns against Israel or net and Yahoo, who best
Speaker 1: understand the nature of things in this region, will change that.
Speaker 1: No amount of lobbying by Arab states in Turkey who
Speaker 1: have their own interests and priorities sound familiar that may
Speaker 1: not and in some cases clearly do not align with ours.
Speaker 1: Who are ours market?
Speaker 2: Yeah sidetracked?
Speaker 1: Okay, the final paragraph. I wanted to read everything else
Speaker 1: for context. This is the final paragraph. Yes, we may
Speaker 1: lose the mid terms for a host of reasons that
Speaker 1: have not changed even before the war with Iran. It
Speaker 1: would be disastrous in many ways, given the radicalism of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party and its intent to destroy our constitution, border,
Speaker 1: and economic system. But if we are perceived as losing
Speaker 1: this war or is failing to finish the job or
Speaker 1: declare victory without victory, it will be used against us.
Speaker 1: Victory just happens to also be good politics. The longer
Speaker 1: it takes, the more difficult it becomes. Literally say it right.
Speaker 1: We may lose, but we can't stop. This is more important.
Speaker 1: It's quite little. Literally the best vindication you and I
Speaker 1: could have asked for.
Speaker 2: It's perfect.
Speaker 1: It's like poetry at rhymes.
Speaker 2: Oh my god. So basically, what happens if he loses? Then?
Speaker 2: In terms what happens? What happened happening to Donald Trump?
Speaker 2: What happens to Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: Well, let me tell you we're never going to get
Speaker 1: the rest of those promises done because Stormy not to
Speaker 1: bury the lead. What do you think our score was
Speaker 1: on these What do you think we cleared four? What
Speaker 1: we did better than that? We got all in? We
Speaker 1: got nine, So that brings us with half points. That
Speaker 1: brings us to a stunning final score of forty five percent,
Speaker 1: which is a failing great by a pretty wide margin.
Speaker 1: I think both you and I were far too optimistic
Speaker 1: on first examination. But the answer is this guy's going
Speaker 1: to get impeached and go to jail, right at least
Speaker 1: if he loses enough. We mentioned, of course before or
Speaker 1: that like the gerrymandering stuff has kind of changed that,
Speaker 1: but like, uh, the stake's a pretty pretty dire. H
Speaker 1: here's a senator I believe from Massachusetts who's threatened to
Speaker 1: send hag Seth to the Hague, which would be funny,
Speaker 1: you know, at the very least, like uh, you know,
Speaker 1: it's kind of up against the wall man, and it's
Speaker 1: not simply the forty five percent hit rate, but it
Speaker 1: is the relative importance of that forty five percent, like
Speaker 1: the like the the training stuff, like, okay, it's not good,
Speaker 1: but I don't really care about you know, men and
Speaker 1: women's sports.
Speaker 2: Doesn't fucking public school or a retard anyways, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Gas is six dollars a gallon, but I mean, at
Speaker 1: least if I were a college volleyball player, i'd have
Speaker 1: a better chance the scholarship, I guess.
Speaker 2: And that's the thing is that we are the largest
Speaker 2: energy exporter and that okay, so remember when all the
Speaker 2: fucking clowns are like, oh no, we're ve we're invading
Speaker 2: Venezuela right to take all the oil and that's going
Speaker 2: to make oil go down here, and oh it doesn't matter,
Speaker 2: the straight up and loose doesn't matter because we don't
Speaker 2: get our energy from the Middle East. Well, if you've
Speaker 2: ever heard this or you do hear this. Let me
Speaker 2: tell you a little bit about how global markets work,
Speaker 2: because you're right, we are the global energy exporder right now,
Speaker 2: which means if gas is I don't know, ten dollars,
Speaker 2: Let's say oil is one hundred dollars of barrel here,
Speaker 2: but it is one hundred and fifty dollars a barrel
Speaker 2: in Europe. Where do you think our oil companies are
Speaker 2: going to be sending that oil? Heint, It's not to
Speaker 2: the gas station near your house. It's where they can
Speaker 2: get the most money from it because we are the
Speaker 2: largest oil exporterer. So it doesn't matter, right, Like global
Speaker 2: energy prices are global energy prices. If energy raises anywhere,
Speaker 2: it raises everywhere because the oil goes to that place. Yes,
Speaker 2: so this is why we can be the largest energy
Speaker 2: producer and exporter, and yet gas is still six stoppers,
Speaker 2: all right, So like all this stuff is, it's so dumb.
Speaker 2: It's so dumb.
Speaker 1: We'll stormy. In conclusion, you are a gay, true brown
Speaker 1: Pannican