Speaker 1: Flowed our country with immigrants. But I bring this up
Speaker 1: to bring up this story here that was shared on
Speaker 1: X Wall Street Apes reports the main wire reveals Catholic.
Speaker 2: Now this is the Roman Catholic cope stream here from
Speaker 2: whoever These dudes are trying to explain this away that
Speaker 2: that's not technically Catholic. Yes, it is.
Speaker 1: The Charities has absolutely nothing to do with anything Catholic.
Speaker 1: It's just an NNGO to import illegals.
Speaker 2: Have these Roman Catholic bros not read the USCCB website?
Speaker 2: Apparently not. Have they not read the last ten years
Speaker 2: of papal statements about open borders in Europe? No, guess not.
Speaker 2: Have they not read Gaudium Espez? Absolutely, of course not.
Speaker 1: What have I been saying this whole time? What have
Speaker 1: I been saying? Go watch the live stream I did
Speaker 1: with Luigi about four weeks ago on the Minnesota crisis
Speaker 1: vindicated in real time. He says there are multiple fake
Speaker 1: church NGOs that Democrats paid tens of billions to import illegals.
Speaker 1: There's a deliberate effort to resettle the Somali refugees by
Speaker 1: groups like Catholic Charities. You hear that the Somali refugee crisis.
Speaker 1: Who's helping them? WHOA we just read it. So Catholic
Speaker 1: Charities makes a huge amount of money moving people migrants
Speaker 1: around to places in the country that don't necessarily vote
Speaker 1: to have that happen. By one lens, you might consider
Speaker 1: Catholic Charities to be a huge does. That's what they do.
Speaker 1: They get paid. They make huge amounts of money to
Speaker 1: take people who've crossed the border illegally and distribute them
Speaker 1: through the United States. Catholic Charities doesn't really have to
Speaker 1: do with anything with being Catholic. It's just a nonprofit
Speaker 1: that makes tons of money and has some kind of
Speaker 1: affiliation with the Catholic Church. The Lutherans do this as well.
Speaker 1: We just reported on this. We reported on this a
Speaker 1: month ago. Okay, there are tons of organizations that are
Speaker 1: in this migrant settlement business and they cloak it. How
Speaker 1: big is the business billions of dollars, billions, tens of
Speaker 1: billions of dollars During the Biden administration, The amount of
Speaker 1: money that was dumped into these it starts to be
Speaker 1: mind numbing, the amounts of money that are dumped on
Speaker 1: these organizations. Let's watch the clip real click because we
Speaker 1: were talking about this not that long ago. Roman Catholic NGOs,
Speaker 1: the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic charities, all
Speaker 1: of these are human trafficking organizations that serve to resettle
Speaker 1: migrants from outside of the country.
Speaker 2: Again, that is so important to understand. This is large,
Speaker 2: industrial scale human trafficking, and the Roman Catholic institution, both
Speaker 2: the Vatican and the United States Roman Catholic Church, participate
Speaker 2: in this, openly support it, openly fund it, openly make
Speaker 2: money from it, and openly say all the way back
Speaker 2: to Gudium, Spez and Vatican too, this is what we want.
Speaker 2: And no tradcats can figure this out, or if they
Speaker 2: do figure it out, they suppress it and handwave of
Speaker 2: it and try to cover it up. Roman Catholicism is
Speaker 2: about covering it up over and over and over, which
Speaker 2: shows you no, wait a minute, is the Holy Spirit
Speaker 2: leading and guiding this institution? Why is it covering up crimes?
Speaker 2: I thought the Holy Spirit was there to expose and
Speaker 2: shed light on evil in crimes. Doesn't Paul say expose
Speaker 2: the deeds of wickedness? Does he say cover it up
Speaker 2: or just say expose it to the light of day,
Speaker 2: he says, expose it. So these poor cath bros listen.
Speaker 2: I'm not your enemy, Catholics. I know a lot of
Speaker 2: y'all hate me, you can't stand me. But I want
Speaker 2: you to do well. I assure you. I want you
Speaker 2: guys to flourish. I want you guys to do well.
Speaker 2: I want you guys to live a happy, successful, fruitful life,
Speaker 2: to not be miserable drunk all the time because you're
Speaker 2: in mortal sin and you got to confess again and
Speaker 2: then again. And it's all just nonsense. It's all a
Speaker 2: religion of dead works. As Paul talks about, I think
Speaker 2: people they can't conceive that I actually love and care
Speaker 2: about people. No, he's mean. Maybe I just actually care.
Speaker 2: What if that's what if that's what's going on, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna do. Let me, let's do the Doctor Phil and
Speaker 2: you go. Is it possible? Is it possible that maybe
Speaker 2: he's right? What if Jay Dier's right? And who actually
Speaker 2: cares about y'all? Is it possible that he's not angry
Speaker 2: and mean and maybe he just cares? Is that possible?
Speaker 2: The little doctor Phil going easy on y'all.
Speaker 1: To the United States, and this is all being done
Speaker 1: with your tax dollars.
Speaker 3: What you see happening is is a program. At first, Yes,
Speaker 3: there is a deliberate effort to reset at all the
Speaker 3: Somali refugees by groups like Catholic charities. So Catholic Charities
Speaker 3: makes a huge amount of money moving people migrants around
Speaker 3: to places in the country that don't necessarily vote to
Speaker 3: have that happen. You might, by one lines, you might
Speaker 3: consider Catholic charities.
Speaker 2: See, this is why we oppose it so vehemently. It's
Speaker 2: not just some nerdy theological speculation that nobody cares about
Speaker 2: about the word you know, energetic manifestation and blackerne and
Speaker 2: who cares about the Philly Okuay doesn't even matter. No,
Speaker 2: this does matter. It's not just the Philly. The phillyok
Speaker 2: Way is what leads to the sum That's my argument. What, yes,
Speaker 2: Philly oak Way equals importation of these people. It's a
Speaker 2: long chain of argumentation to get there, but it is correct.
Speaker 3: A human trafficking organization because that's what they do.
Speaker 2: They get paid.
Speaker 3: They make huge amounts of money to take people who've
Speaker 3: crossed the border illegally and distribute them throughout the United States.
Speaker 2: This is great Steve, I'm Catholic.
Speaker 3: Well know this, well, good for you, Catholic charities doesn't
Speaker 3: really have anything to do with being Catholic.
Speaker 2: Uh really, Now, again this ends up being no true
Speaker 2: scotsman because he's going to say, well, it's not actually
Speaker 2: the Catholic position to import migrants, o is it? Because
Speaker 2: chain migration is in Gaudium as pes so it is
Speaker 2: the Catholic position. In fact, it's fully papal to do.
Speaker 1: This, except for them being associated with the Roman Catholic Church.
Speaker 2: And the official Vatica position not just in the U
Speaker 2: on the USCCV website, but also back to Gaudium at SPEs.
Speaker 2: So props to cleave for covering that one. That was
Speaker 2: a good contradiction to catch there. Now, I am not
Speaker 2: going to spend much time on this. I am gonna
Speaker 2: mention it because it illustrates again once again we're vindicated.
Speaker 2: What did I say about six to eight months ago
Speaker 2: about scamshamouze drama. I said, give it time and the
Speaker 2: oral boros will manifest. What are you talking about? You're
Speaker 2: speaking esoteric gibbers. No, No, the ooral boros is the
Speaker 2: snake eating himself, eating his own tail with these weirdo
Speaker 2: prima donnas like William Albrecht, the biggest liar on the Internet.
Speaker 2: He lies more than Lofton or anybody. He's just insane
Speaker 2: levels of lies. Right, what did I tell you this weirdo?
Speaker 2: Just give it time and some nonsense is going to
Speaker 2: fly off the handle. And that's exactly what happens. Suddenly
Speaker 2: we've got scam shamou. I don't want anything to do
Speaker 2: with Albrect. He's the worst person on the Internet. I
Speaker 2: told you in no time, give it a few months,
Speaker 2: I said six months to a year. They'll hate each
Speaker 2: other vindicated. I told you now. Allegedly to use the
Speaker 2: cat Williams phrase. Allegedly, William Albrecht allegedly faked a Grinder
Speaker 2: profile of some other no name Roman Catholic apologists I've
Speaker 2: never heard of. And this has offended the other Roman
Speaker 2: Catholics because, as a Cleave noted, this was cracking me
Speaker 2: up the other night, the Roman Catholics have all spent
Speaker 2: many hours studying the Grinder profiles and the pictures. They've
Speaker 2: all got the receipts. They spent many hours studying the
Speaker 2: Grinder pictures and profiles, and they know very well how
Speaker 2: Grinder works. I'm not joking. You can't make this up.
Speaker 2: And they've discovered that no, No Divine Mercy Apologetics does not
Speaker 2: have a Grinder profile. It was actually faked by some
Speaker 2: other William Albrecht adjacent Skittles person. Yeah, how about this.
Speaker 2: They are all gay. My theory is they're all in
Speaker 2: a big stupid gay fight because they're all jealous of
Speaker 2: their other butt buddies. That's what's going on. That's the
Speaker 2: real story. And I was dying laughing when Cleve was
Speaker 2: covering this talking about Now, wait a minute, how did
Speaker 2: that you spent how long? I spent the last two
Speaker 2: weeks studying these Grinder pictures and learning the ins and
Speaker 2: outs of Grinder's code and actually how to sign up
Speaker 2: for the website and what it actually takes to upload
Speaker 2: all your photos. And I downloaded all the photos of
Speaker 2: all the interested parties. And I've done a lot of
Speaker 2: top Nutch research. I've got top men and bottom men.
Speaker 2: Top men and bottom men are involved in this case.
Speaker 2: And we have come to the conclusion that Grinder is
Speaker 2: fully first of all our Catholic website. There's nothing actually
Speaker 2: anti Catholic about it. So that's number one, it has
Speaker 2: an impromoter from Cardinal Mahoney. Carla Honey gave a grinder
Speaker 2: and impromoter. And then secondly, uh and is in fact
Speaker 2: false anyway, I'm not joking. So this is actually what's
Speaker 2: going on in the Roman Catholic apologetic world. Who knows
Speaker 2: what's really going on? Again, they're all I told you,
Speaker 2: there's all a bunch of Again. Why are these romancalicis
Speaker 2: even involved in gay stuff anyway? Oh? Because they're Romancalolic exactly.
Speaker 2: So listen to this.
Speaker 1: Simon craziness, because that was wild. You know what, I'll
Speaker 1: go ahead and I'll cover it. Now, let's cover the
Speaker 1: sam Shimone. Let's do a little sam shimone. Uh stuff? So,
Speaker 1: so what what brought me? So this is gonna be
Speaker 1: this is the this is the craziest story this entire stream. Okay,
Speaker 1: so this involved sam Shimone, William Albret and Divine Mercy apologetics.
Speaker 1: I was actually brought this. This guy brought this to
Speaker 1: my attention. So talent Papist, the rising star, by the way.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's he's the worst. He's He's worse than all
Speaker 2: the world worst. There's no one than that guy. But
Speaker 2: he's the one that first called attention to this, I suppose.
Speaker 2: So let's skip ahead, because basically all you need to
Speaker 2: know is that William Albright alleged that Divine Mercy Apologetics
Speaker 2: was on grinder and was showing himself to people or something,
Speaker 2: and then all this other sphere of Shamun and these
Speaker 2: other people said, oh, William has made this up. And
Speaker 2: William and his allies, and I'm sure William has allies
Speaker 2: in the gay sense, they have actually engineered this. Now
Speaker 2: I don't care about Sam Schmun at all, but I do.
Speaker 2: I do not trust anything that William albrig says. So
Speaker 2: first of all, I can tell you that that du
Speaker 2: lies all the time. For example, for many years people
Speaker 2: have said, why would you not do a public debate
Speaker 2: with Albright? Well, you can ask UBI and I both
Speaker 2: have attempted on more than one occasion two set of
Speaker 2: debates with William Albrick, And what invariably happens is that
Speaker 2: he will agree to a date about six to eight
Speaker 2: months ahead. Okay, this happened to me twice. It happened no,
Speaker 2: three times, three times with me and once or twice
Speaker 2: with UBI. As the date approaches, William will then say
Speaker 2: I need to reschedule. Blah blah blah has happened. Okay,
Speaker 2: I'll give you another three months, another four months, whatever.
Speaker 2: Then as the next date approaches, some drama happens to
Speaker 2: where he will not interact or engage with you because
Speaker 2: of blah blah blah blah blah and your moral infractions. Right,
Speaker 2: So this happened to me back in I want to
Speaker 2: say twenty eighteen, we had this whole drama with allbrights happened.
Speaker 2: Recycle this again, it happens recycle last year it happened,
Speaker 2: and I chronicled it on my shorts where Andrew live called.
Speaker 2: He called into Shimoon and all bricks thing and said,
Speaker 2: do you want to set up this debate a dire Yes,
Speaker 2: we'll do it. Let's do it. Then sham Shimun. Oh,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to interact with any of you because
Speaker 2: Wilson knows dire. So he backs out of it. But
Speaker 2: we get leather Daddy to agree, Yes, he's gonna do it.
Speaker 2: Let me play you the clip where he agrees to
Speaker 2: do it and then he backs out because of whatever
Speaker 2: he's Oh this I don't remember. Oh, he says, I
Speaker 2: never agreed to it. Well, here's Andrew live texting and
Speaker 2: calling Albrecht where Albert agrees to it. And then Albert says, oh,
Speaker 2: I didn't never agree to it. Those all laws.
Speaker 4: And I said, does that work for you? And he said,
Speaker 4: does he agree to my thesis? If he does, then
Speaker 4: we are set. And I said, oh, well, can you
Speaker 4: re write it and make it more clear for me?
Speaker 4: And he said, uh, okay, it's very difficult because I'm
Speaker 4: tending to my daughter. Now give me a few minutes
Speaker 4: and I'll write it out without typos. If he agrees,
Speaker 4: where hundred percent set, and then all we have to
Speaker 4: do is iron ow to date. And I said, yes,
Speaker 4: he agrees to that, that the post Vatican two church
Speaker 4: contradicts the pre Vatican two church, magistrate and tradition.
Speaker 2: This was my offer. This was what he agreed to.
Speaker 2: Is what I agreed to.
Speaker 4: The Red Jay that exact message. And Jay said, I agree.
Speaker 4: I told him, yes, he agrees to that. That's it,
Speaker 4: it's done, it's locked in. And I said, does that
Speaker 4: work for you?
Speaker 2: So?
Speaker 4: And he said does he agree?
Speaker 1: So?
Speaker 2: This was my third attempt in the last seven years
Speaker 2: of setting up a debate with us goober and I'm done.
Speaker 2: So that's why we never had another we never actually
Speaker 2: had a debate is because he won't do it. He
Speaker 2: always pulls some big drama and says, oh, no, Jay
Speaker 2: is causing it. A Jay one. He's just an absolute liar.
Speaker 2: And I told Sam schmoun a long time ago, I said,
Speaker 2: you're going to regret or butt buddy there that you're
Speaker 2: so close to. And what do you know, who was right?
Speaker 1: Brick William Albrocht was like the last dude that was
Speaker 1: still doing streams with Sam Schramon. So now he's like
Speaker 1: officially cut off everyone that he's worked with in the past.
Speaker 1: He's gonna have to start scraping the bottom of the
Speaker 1: barrel to find new people to associate with because I
Speaker 1: guess I don't know everybody that he associates with in
Speaker 1: the past. Yeah, he like burns bridges. It seems like anyway,
Speaker 1: pray for pray for Sam. Obviously something is going on.
Speaker 1: But anyway, this explains why I no longer worker associate
Speaker 1: with William Malbrack. Watch it and be ready to get
Speaker 1: heartbroken and extremely angry at the lies and injustices that
Speaker 1: were carried out. So this which a super chat goal.
Speaker 1: I super appreciate it. We got a goal on this stream.
Speaker 1: I appreciate your support. I'm gonna dive into this, but
Speaker 1: I might speed this up a little bit. I don't
Speaker 1: know why. What is it? What is up with Roman
Speaker 1: Catholic YouTubers and being super long winded when I was
Speaker 1: doing apologetic stuff like.
Speaker 2: Period and able.
Speaker 5: You can come up if you'd like that.
Speaker 2: Now, let's apply our analysis that we gave of Roots
Speaker 2: of Orthodoxy and his grifting fraudy, which we called out
Speaker 2: day one because he did what he put his YouTube
Speaker 2: play button behind him on his icon wall. What does
Speaker 2: this grifter do? He wears a cassick? Why is this
Speaker 2: fake ass skittles man YouTuber wearing a cast sick? He's
Speaker 2: not a priest LARPing? And then he's got some buff
Speaker 2: gay dude up there on his wall bills butcher house
Speaker 2: next to Jesus with the Eucharist. Guys, these people are loons,
Speaker 2: they're psychos, they're narcissistic, weird fraud creeps. Can you not
Speaker 2: just see this? Can you not spot the frauds? Like
Speaker 2: it's the exact same move as Roots of Orthodoxy. And
Speaker 2: you bet he's got a lisp. Why do you think
Speaker 2: I call him leather Daddy? That dude's skittles is all
Speaker 2: get out? Can you keep? Can't tell? By the way
Speaker 2: this liar said in a chat years ago, he was
Speaker 2: gonna beat me up if we ever, if you ever
Speaker 2: saw me in person. And I screenshot of that, not
Speaker 2: because I'm scared of this goober, but because it was
Speaker 2: so preposterous that instead of actually debating, he said he
Speaker 2: wanted to fight, and I said, are you serious? He said,
Speaker 2: you just better hope that we don't ever meet in person.
Speaker 2: Then he said he never said it, and I'm like, okay.
Speaker 2: So this dude is an absolute liar, absolute liar. So
Speaker 2: is it any surprise that these drama queen just lunatics
Speaker 2: falling out? Absolutely not. And what does it tell you, brother?
Speaker 2: Probably all on grinder, They're probably all cheating on each other,
Speaker 2: and that's why they're all mad. They found new by buddies,
Speaker 2: and that's why they're mad at each other. That's probably
Speaker 2: what's going on.
Speaker 5: Watch watch that come out to come up, Please come
Speaker 5: up and confirm.
Speaker 2: I can.
Speaker 5: I even have a bunch of female moderators, so they
Speaker 5: couldn't be around anymore.
Speaker 2: I can't believe that William Albricks got you.
Speaker 6: Guys can't figure out that he's got a lisp, and
Speaker 6: you're trying to figure out what's going on.
Speaker 2: There's probably all bres grinder profile, and how do they
Speaker 2: all know how well it works.
Speaker 6: I went on there to do research. I was doing
Speaker 6: the Grinder's research, okay, And I was just just researching
Speaker 6: for the last three weeks on grinder, just to do research,
Speaker 6: just to just to figure out how the site works,
Speaker 6: just to see how many pictures that you could upload
Speaker 6: and perhaps download. Perhaps that's all just research. And I
Speaker 6: just want to publicly just pray for everybody and just
Speaker 6: watch me pray on Just pray with me for the
Speaker 6: next twenty minutes online.
Speaker 5: He was going to be around. He was removed for drama.
Speaker 5: And one thing people don't realize you.
Speaker 2: Was removed for drama. You start removing drama. You start
Speaker 2: if you implement a policy in these circles of removal
Speaker 2: for drama, there won't be anybody in the circles. They'd
Speaker 2: all remove themselves. The whole circle would collapse. There would
Speaker 2: be nobody in there. All these losers have is drama.
Speaker 2: I mean, these people are the most ridiculous. And I'm
Speaker 2: not saying that, oh you're met, No, no, no, I've dealt
Speaker 2: with these people like all Brecks since like twenty seventeen. Dude,
Speaker 2: it's almost a decade of knowing these goobers. And it's
Speaker 2: the same gooberrie. It was the same crap ten years ago.
Speaker 2: The first time I messaged William Albreck, I'll tell you
Speaker 2: this was fun. This part's funny. This is like twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2: I said, hey, i've heard you doing Catholic apologetics. We
Speaker 2: should try to set up a debate and he said, yes,
Speaker 2: I would love to debate you on Christology and Philly Oquay. Right.
Speaker 2: So we were talking about this originally long time ago.
Speaker 2: He said, could you give me a reading list? Yeah?
Speaker 2: I said, absolutely, be glad to. So I give him
Speaker 2: about five different things to read on Essen scenarios, sing
Speaker 2: Shinphilly Oquay. This is like twenty seventeen. That's when he says, oh,
Speaker 2: give me six months. And by the way, I only
Speaker 2: do in person debates. Now he had already been doing
Speaker 2: a bunch of internet crap and I'm like, in person debates.
Speaker 2: Why do you only do it in person debates? And
Speaker 2: he says, Oh, I'm actually nationally syndicated Catholic radio hosts.
Speaker 2: And I'm like what, Like, dude, nobody cares about radio.
Speaker 2: He's like, I'm on AMFM Catholic radio all the time.
Speaker 2: Like as if that like bragging, right, like flexing, He's
Speaker 2: trying to flex on AMF radio. I'm like, are you
Speaker 2: a boomer? AMFM radio? Are you? Are you playing motown oldies?
Speaker 2: What are you talking about AMFM radio? Dude, this is
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, it's already the Internet era. I'm not kidding
Speaker 2: this way. He said, No, you don't understand.
Speaker 6: I only do in person debates and only appear on
Speaker 6: Catholic radio.
Speaker 2: I'm like, come on a freaking YouTube debate. I don't
Speaker 2: do YouTube debates. And he was already on YouTube with
Speaker 2: YouTube debates. I'm like, yes, you do. What are you
Speaker 2: talking about? No, I only do a person to have
Speaker 2: a higher tier that He's like, I'm a higher tier
Speaker 2: than that higher tier dude, you had he had two
Speaker 2: thousand subscribers till you know, high tier. What are you
Speaker 2: talking about? So then he's like, well, let's just planning
Speaker 2: to do it in person. Probably want to probably want to
Speaker 2: touch butts or something. It's like, I'm not meeting up
Speaker 2: with you in person. You give me the creeps. Dude.
Speaker 2: By the way, I'm all about people going to the gym.
Speaker 2: I like going to the gym. When we're in Florida,
Speaker 2: we try to go on the regular. But I will
Speaker 2: say this about the sphere of the workout obsessed dudes.
Speaker 2: Guess what, there's a lot of gay shit in that
Speaker 2: workout stuff, like the dudes that are all in. I'm
Speaker 2: not saying everybody that's into bodybuilding. I'm not saying about
Speaker 2: guess what, a lot of bodybuilding stuff. It's a lot
Speaker 2: of gay stuff. And I didn't know this until fairly recently.
Speaker 2: I'm being serious. I don't know. I'm not into gay
Speaker 2: codes and I don't know gay culture and all, but
Speaker 2: apparently the whole bodybuilding Let me put up all the
Speaker 2: images on Instagram of how buff I am. Now. I'm
Speaker 2: not dissing Cotel. I don't think Cotel's gay. Big fan
Speaker 2: of Hotel, always been very cool in person. He's married,
Speaker 2: got a beautiful German wife. But the body building sphere,
Speaker 2: that's a that's a potential and it's not a proof,
Speaker 2: but it's a potential. That's that's gonna set you gaydar off. Okay, Okay,
Speaker 2: So because everything's getting so freaking skittles, I'm forced to
Speaker 2: now have gaydar. I never even had gaydar, didn't even
Speaker 2: think about it. Well, apparently you gotta have it now
Speaker 2: because because this is everybody's trying to make you into
Speaker 2: a butt toucher. I'm not touching nobody's butts. Mm hmmm
Speaker 2: mm hmm, stay away. So see I didn't know this.
Speaker 2: People are saying, turns out bodybuilding actually started in the
Speaker 2: gay community. Now I'm assuming that's true.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 2: I don't. I don't know the history of this genre.
Speaker 2: But I mean, i'll tell you this there. I have
Speaker 2: never had posters, first of all, not against my icon wall.
Speaker 2: Who has a freaking icon wall next to freaking buff dudes?
Speaker 2: That's just freaking weird, dude. But who even has posters
Speaker 2: of buff dudes? Who's not? I mean, if you're like
Speaker 2: a fifteen year old kid and you're like, I like
Speaker 2: these guys, this is a superheroes and you got a
Speaker 2: he Man poster. Okay, my friend that drew, he drew
Speaker 2: comic books, okay when we were teenagers. Okay, he's got
Speaker 2: X men posters. I get it right, buff dudes. You
Speaker 2: want to learn how to draw if you're an adult
Speaker 2: and you got giant posters of buff dudes? First of all,
Speaker 2: are you a teenager or are you an adult? It's
Speaker 2: just freaking weird anyway, that's all to say about this.
Speaker 2: That's all my riffing and jokes on if you if
Speaker 2: you want to see what the whole drama is, you
Speaker 2: can watch Cleaves stream right here, stream to antiquity right there.
Speaker 2: And I didn't want to mention, by the way, throughout
Speaker 2: the coof we did many many many podcasts, many many
Speaker 2: many streams, many many fourth hours of Lord Boldemort. And
Speaker 2: what did I harp on over and over and over
Speaker 2: and over and over during the coof sy op sye
Speaker 2: op sy opsy Ops. I got tired of talking about it.
Speaker 2: I got tired of site in Klaus's books. I got
Speaker 2: sick of it. And what do we have now? Well,
Speaker 2: let's see what this letter from the wef what it says.
Speaker 2: There have been significant developments in the past five to
Speaker 2: seven years on social, environmental and tech fronts that could
Speaker 2: help realize the carbon initiatives for shaping the future. This
Speaker 2: could lead towards towards smart city, the stainable. We talked
Speaker 2: about all that specifically in this context, the COOF was
Speaker 2: a test of social responsibility. What did I tell you
Speaker 2: throughout the whole COOF this is a gigantic psyop test
Speaker 2: R and D prepping you, studying you. How do they
Speaker 2: react to the idea of biothreats, biometric threats? And remember
Speaker 2: out of that they said the future is biometric terror,
Speaker 2: by which they mean people not complying can potentially be
Speaker 2: labeled biometric terror threats. Ah. You see, you didn't participate
Speaker 2: in the mandated things. You are now a health environmental threat.
Speaker 2: A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were
Speaker 2: adopted by billions of people across the world that they
Speaker 2: admit it was unimaginable. There were numerous examples of globally
Speaker 2: maintaining social distancing masks, stabbies, acceptance of contact tracing, which
Speaker 2: demonstrated the core of social responsibility. You have a duty
Speaker 2: to the collective. What collective the world says? Who says Klaus,
Speaker 2: the Rockefeller Foundation and the United Nations. In fact, do
Speaker 2: you remember that during the coup the CDC said we
Speaker 2: are now subservient too, the Rockefeller Foundation and the United Nations. Yes,
Speaker 2: look that up. I couldn't believe it when they said it.
Speaker 2: And I still have normies like Jimmy Aiken Trent Horn
Speaker 2: that say that none of this was a plan, none
Speaker 2: of it was a sy op, none of it was
Speaker 2: a globalist elite scheme, even when they admit it. Has
Speaker 2: Trent Horne admitted he was wrong about anything. No, In fact,
Speaker 2: Trent Horn has never admitted that he's been wrong about
Speaker 2: anything in the last five years. Amazing, Trent pushed stabbies,
Speaker 2: Trent pushed all of your social responsibility duties. And was
Speaker 2: he wrong about any of it? No, he was. He
Speaker 2: still triples down. Even though the term triad is a
Speaker 2: term used in his own liturgy, he still says that
Speaker 2: it's an anti Trinitarian term. This is your pap apologist
Speaker 2: that you listen to, That alone should end his career
Speaker 2: to be so fundamentally silly to make such a basic
Speaker 2: mistake about a preditarian term in his liturgy, And he
Speaker 2: still triples down and says it's an anti Trinitarian term
Speaker 2: that should end his career, And it doesn't. In fact,
Speaker 2: he gets bigger numbers You're just jealous. Okay, you can
Speaker 2: think that. You think I'm just jealous. Yes, so even
Speaker 2: though I'm correct about what I said about Candae, about
Speaker 2: what I say about Trent Horne, about what I said
Speaker 2: about Laus and the Whift, it's all just jealousy. Sure, sure, yes,
Speaker 2: Trent is a male feminist. Explicitly. You think I'm making jokes.
Speaker 2: He debated Tim Gordon as a male feminist. That was
Speaker 2: his position. And you normies, all of you Catholic goobers,
Speaker 2: all you big numbers, you would rather listen to that
Speaker 2: than this. Why? Because you're mean. Let's say, I mean,
Speaker 2: let's be adult. Okay, fine, I mean, am I wrong? Uh?
Speaker 2: Yehko's the keys? Who's the keys? You know? There's like
Speaker 2: a fourteenth century Orthodox saint. I forget which saint it is,
Speaker 2: but he made the joke. It's somebody made a meme
Speaker 2: out of it. It's a great meme. There's an Orthodox
Speaker 2: saint from like the fourteenth century, and he said, anytime
Speaker 2: you debate the Roman Catholics the papist, they jingle the
Speaker 2: keys in your face. They've been doing this since the
Speaker 2: fourteen hundreds. Dude, somebody needs to dig that meme up.
Speaker 2: I think Snack shared that years ago. Snack always had
Speaker 2: these like classic memes. Snack was the king of like
Speaker 2: awesome memes. Abuu Aquinas meme that was a neck meme.
Speaker 2: All right, So you see I'm correct. I was correct
Speaker 2: about this. That the more correct I am, the less
Speaker 2: people want to listen. That's that's what's getting weird. It's
Speaker 2: like you would think I'm vindicated. You think the audience
Speaker 2: is getting bigger. I mean it is, but you would think, oh,
Speaker 2: maybe Candace doesn't know what she's talking about. Maybe the
Speaker 2: guy who was saying all the stuff that Candace just learned,
Speaker 2: not the crazy shit, but the actual real stuff that
Speaker 2: Candas just learned two years ago. The guy that like
Speaker 2: Jay and Lord voldemart Oh, they were saying it fifteen
Speaker 2: twenty years ago. No, no, we don't listen to them.
Speaker 2: We're gonna listen to Little Oprah. That's my girl, Little Oprah.
Speaker 2: Y'all listen to Little Oprah. My own family members listened
Speaker 2: to Little Oprah, but they won't listen to me. Well,
Speaker 2: we saw you in your poopy pants when you were
Speaker 2: a kid, so why would we listen to you. Surely,
Speaker 2: Little Oprah and her architectural digest that she reads. She read,
Speaker 2: She read architectural digests. She's smart. She know what? Uh
Speaker 2: she read? She read Green Berett Weekly. What was the
Speaker 2: other one? She know how to compromentalize? You got if
Speaker 2: you can't complementalize, see see you so you so dumb?
Speaker 2: You think it matters how you say words? You just dumb,
Speaker 2: white boy? You don't know. You don't know what matters
Speaker 2: is who got that dive emotion? Who got that sass?
Speaker 2: And it ain't you, white boy? Then I don't see
Speaker 2: how you're going to be able to We don't like them,
Speaker 2: We don't agree with the industries they went into.
Speaker 4: All of that can be true, but you have to
Speaker 4: be able to comperimentalize that.
Speaker 2: Y'all can't come comperimentalize. The problem is this audience is
Speaker 2: too uh. They think they smart, but they can't comperimentalize.
Speaker 2: Midnight Lights says for two dollars show Gorman, Massacre of
Speaker 2: and or Star Wars clips. Oh you mean, for like
Speaker 2: what's happening in Minneapolis? Well, if I play anything like that,
Speaker 2: it'll ding the algorithm. But people can look up the
Speaker 2: Star Wars show in or season two gormand massacre, which
Speaker 2: they're saying is probably mimics or similar to these events.
Speaker 2: Five dollars. Hark al da hark al aada. What is
Speaker 2: your appistment opinion on Asman Gold. I'll be honest with you,
Speaker 2: I don't. I've only seen like a few handful of
Speaker 2: eclipse of him over the years, so I don't really
Speaker 2: follow or know what his takes are. What would you
Speaker 2: do a live stream with him? Of course? I mean
Speaker 2: you think I would pass up a live stream of
Speaker 2: like one of the top YouTubers. Hell, no, of course
Speaker 2: I would. I mean I don't he does. I don't
Speaker 2: even know if he knows who I am, so he
Speaker 2: may not want to do a lot of stream, but
Speaker 2: I'll do it. Of course I would see why? See
Speaker 2: why why? Fifty dollars? Quantum politics? We live relativist, we
Speaker 2: live relativistic towards each other. There's neither neither equally nor equitably. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I think that's a good way to put it. I think,
Speaker 2: maybe more than I mean, I think the way you're
Speaker 2: using quantum there for quantum politics, it's postmodern, right, it
Speaker 2: really is postmodern? I mean, and I know that's like
Speaker 2: you know, Jordan Peterson overused. That kind of.
Speaker 1: Postmodern sports all postmarder.
Speaker 2: You know what it's like. Heck, you know it's postmodern,
Speaker 2: but it really is because postmodern philosophy is basically saying
Speaker 2: there's not objective truth, there's not objective reality. Everyone is
Speaker 2: crafting their truth and their reality, their story. All it
Speaker 2: is is competing stories, and so postmodernism kind of falls
Speaker 2: into Nietzscheanism or will to power, or you know, just
Speaker 2: basically whoever has the numbers. Oh interesting, it sounds like
Speaker 2: Roman Catholicism doesn't. Again, rumos is the true because of
Speaker 2: the numbers. Candace is right because she's got the numbers,
Speaker 2: and you're just jealous. Well, that's all postmodernism. That's all
Speaker 2: will to power. That just tells me that it's not
Speaker 2: about what's true. It's not about who actually has a
Speaker 2: track record of being correct. It's none of that. It's
Speaker 2: just will to power. But actually, if you think about it,
Speaker 2: that is papism, the papacy is, and that's what Candace is.
Speaker 2: She's a papist. Papism is worship of authority, worship of
Speaker 2: geopolitical power and numbers. The walls is over here cracking,
Speaker 2: it's so cold, the walls are cracking from the windows
Speaker 2: through the wows aha, five forty five bucks. Is the
Speaker 2: US taxpayer considered a creditor in the rocheld system or
Speaker 2: is it just the banks? Good question. Uh, let's see.
Speaker 2: By the way, my uh my, my stream labs is
Speaker 2: not showing stream labs super chats because when I opened
Speaker 2: up my stream labs to do the stream, the internet
Speaker 2: cut out because of the storm. So if you sent
Speaker 2: a stream lab superchat, I can't. Oh, I know what
Speaker 2: I can do. I can log into stream labs and
Speaker 2: read it that way. So let's see if we can
Speaker 2: look at the stream lab superchats. Okay, yoh, so we
Speaker 2: got quite a few of these. Wow, we got quite
Speaker 2: a few to read over here. Silver Enjoyer three dollars. Jay.
Speaker 2: When I ask for will project to the Roman empuct,
Speaker 2: they don't accept my bitcoin hashtag Dinaris forever. Well, I
Speaker 2: guess that is one argument as a bitcoiner that I
Speaker 2: can't refute. If you astral project and you're trying to
Speaker 2: engage in economic activities, probably bitcoin ain't gonna work. Funk,
Speaker 2: go month five dollars. Somebody needs to tell Sweet Candae
Speaker 2: to get a dictionary and look up them Sumerian TPUSA
Speaker 2: Jesuit wormholes that Charlie camp through exactly exactly. So that's
Speaker 2: what we've been saying for a long time. Anonymous, Why
Speaker 2: is Tucker Anglican from his what he grew up? I
Speaker 2: guess explain this to a foreigner. Is it because of aristocracy?
Speaker 2: Do you have aristocratic families of English ascent in the US? Yes,
Speaker 2: that does exist. Do they have a significant influence in
Speaker 2: US politics? Probably not that much, but there is a
Speaker 2: little bit of that. Yeah. I think a lot of
Speaker 2: the Eastern Seaboard elite kind of trace their lineage that way.
Speaker 2: And a lot of the early OSS and CIA people
Speaker 2: were actually recruited out of the Episcopal Church. And that's
Speaker 2: because a lot of the founding fathers and those sort
Speaker 2: of elite families on the Eastern Seaboard were Episcopal, they
Speaker 2: were Anglican, So there is a pedigree. But I mean,
Speaker 2: I would you know, it doesn't mean that like the
Speaker 2: CIA is run by episcopals and it I mean, I
Speaker 2: mean the CIA is recruited a bunch of Jesuits. In fact,
Speaker 2: that reminds me there's so many nuggets in this book.
Speaker 2: As you guys know, we're doing the Council on Foreign
Speaker 2: Relations author Burton Hirsch, American Elite and the Origins of
Speaker 2: the CIA, the Old Boys, and I'm getting pretty close
Speaker 2: to halfway. It's not an easy read. There's a lot,
Speaker 2: a lot of details. It's a lot of history and information,
Speaker 2: so it's a lot to take in. But I did
Speaker 2: come to this, which I thought was pretty wild Pius
Speaker 2: the twelfth, and we already kind of knew this. We've
Speaker 2: talked about this a lot, but as he had another
Speaker 2: source vindicating this point, which is on page one sixty seven,
Speaker 2: speaking of James Jesus Angleton, the Cold War spymaster. I
Speaker 2: thought there might be something on YouTube. I mean, there's
Speaker 2: a lot of Angleton videos, but there's nothing about this.
Speaker 2: But he did cultivate very close relationship with Pious the twelve.
Speaker 2: Angleton was instrumental in taking the edge off of the
Speaker 2: OSS's late war humiliations. During his COI days, Donovan Bill
Speaker 2: Donovan cultivated a close relationship with Pis the twelve. He
Speaker 2: capitalized on this by plugging into the political roundups of
Speaker 2: the anti common Tern and the anti Nazi operations known
Speaker 2: as Prodeo, the so called Black Reports. The way was
Speaker 2: then opened accordingly. When OSS chief in Rome, Vincent Scamporini,
Speaker 2: he picked up extremely productive agents who purported to market
Speaker 2: day by day documents out of the diplomatic traffic at
Speaker 2: the Vatican. Angleton wasn't convinced as X two in Rome,
Speaker 2: this is high level OSS placement. He did not like
Speaker 2: the feeling. He did not like the feel of the
Speaker 2: thing when the cutout to the Vatican could not be
Speaker 2: located in the registry of the Sis. Now that's a
Speaker 2: little bit convoluted, but basically a couple pages later it
Speaker 2: fills it out and it says in nineteen forty five,
Speaker 2: James Jesus Angleton would concede that he was coordinating many
Speaker 2: matters with the Vatican's sophisticated intelligence apparatus. Now, Angleton is
Speaker 2: the spymaster cold warrior who, as you guys probably know,
Speaker 2: if you remember in the JFK files we covered this
Speaker 2: organized and coordinated many of the backdoor relationships with the
Speaker 2: Middle East and certain countries in the Middle East. You
Speaker 2: know what I'm referring to. We made a video on this,
Speaker 2: right you know, I'm not talking about the Muslims. I'm
Speaker 2: talking about the other country in the Middle East who
Speaker 2: had a agenda vendetta against JFK, And that does not
Speaker 2: make JFK some ideal hero well who was forging this
Speaker 2: alliance with the papacy even before William Colby, even before
Speaker 2: John pulled the second and all that. By nineteen forty five,
Speaker 2: Angleton coordinated many matters with the Vatican's sophisticated intelligence apparatus.
Speaker 2: Bill Donovan reopened this exchange by delegating Henry Hyde to
Speaker 2: Escore the Reverend Robert Lieber, a Bavarian Jesuit who served
Speaker 2: as a confidential secret informant, diplomat and apologist for the Pope.
Speaker 2: So he worked together with the Jesuit liber with Donovan
Speaker 2: and Engleton in Engleton's CIA Vatican intelligence coordination. This was
Speaker 2: when Angleton was X two and X two is not
Speaker 2: the X men, but it is the high level OSS
Speaker 2: spy in Rome. Was I muted through all that? What
Speaker 2: are you talking about?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: You mean muting when I sneezed? Can we get a
Speaker 2: document cam on that? Let me say you, I love
Speaker 2: be getting fancy. The old document can went out. It
Speaker 2: was a little cheap one, but we got fancy document
Speaker 2: cams now here you go. So another source they were
Speaker 2: recruiting and working with Vatican intelligence and the Jesuits in
Speaker 2: the nineteen forties. Now, every time I talk about this,
Speaker 2: I get the low IQ Roman Catholics who respond by saying, well, based, dude,
Speaker 2: based the base. Here's the thing, the reason that this
Speaker 2: is not based. And again I against communists. I'm not
Speaker 2: saying it's bad, but oh, they were fighting communists, so
Speaker 2: it's bad because communists are good. This is how low iq.
Speaker 2: This is what the people think. I'm saying. When you
Speaker 2: make this alliance with the Vatican and the CIA, what
Speaker 2: happens is you have a new master. Now now you're
Speaker 2: answerable to the CIA and what it wants and what
Speaker 2: it pushes. And this is before Vatican Two. Now what
Speaker 2: happens ten years after, twenty years after this alliance in
Speaker 2: the nineteen forties between Donovan Angleton, William Colby, and Pious
Speaker 2: the Twelfth in the Vatican, Oh, Vatican two happens. Interesting?
Speaker 2: And what does David Wimhoff's seven hundred page book right
Speaker 2: here say, Oh, well, the CIA influenced the Vatican to
Speaker 2: go along with the Americanism that John Courtney Murray, also
Speaker 2: recruited by the CIA, was promoting. What does that mean Americanism.
Speaker 2: It means humanism, religious liberty, religious freedom, all of the
Speaker 2: things that Vatican two promotes in Nostra Atate, lumingentium, being
Speaker 2: the taughtest humani, etcetera. All of these Vatican two documents
Speaker 2: that deal with the liberalization, the Protestantization. It's not just theology, nerds,
Speaker 2: it's geopolitical power and influence. In fact, Look Magazine, the
Speaker 2: famous Jewish magazine, and I learned this as a trade cat.
Speaker 2: Look Magazine wrote articles back in this I want to
Speaker 2: say the sixties ragging that they had convinced the authors
Speaker 2: of Nostra Tate to make the statements it did about
Speaker 2: the Jews. Now, am I supposed to believe that that's
Speaker 2: the Holy Spirit guiding all that process? If I'm a
Speaker 2: Roman Catholic, that's what I have to believe. But remember
Speaker 2: who was it that drafted Gregory Baum, the Jewish Catholic priest,
Speaker 2: one of the key writers of the early drafts of
Speaker 2: Nosra tat. He was supposedly persecuted by people and then
Speaker 2: left the priesthood, came out as openly gay after No
Speaker 2: Sra Tate. But don't worry, just follow the pope, Just
Speaker 2: follow the Pope. By the way, uh, I wanted to
Speaker 2: comment just briefly on a couple of funny things. So
Speaker 2: when I made this post, it's just so people never
Speaker 2: understand what you mean or what you're trying to get at.
Speaker 2: And actually, sometimes for tweets, that's actually a good thing,
Speaker 2: because then people go crazy commenting and sharing, thinking that
Speaker 2: you said one thing when that's not what you meant.
Speaker 2: I said. It didn't go super viral, but it got
Speaker 2: two It's almost three thousand likes, which is pretty good.
Speaker 2: You were all witnessing in lifetime the failure of libertarianism
Speaker 2: in action, as I have critiqued for the last fifteen years. Now,
Speaker 2: let's look at this guy, who is some sort of
Speaker 2: congress person or veteran or something. I don't know who
Speaker 2: he is. Michael White says, over the past fifteen years,
Speaker 2: eight Congresses have convened the Senate blah blah blah. Only
Speaker 2: one was a libertarian, Justin Amesh who switched to libertarianism
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty to the party. No libertarian ever served
Speaker 2: in the Senate. So the argument is that point one
Speaker 2: percent of legislative apparatus has nothing to do with these
Speaker 2: actual plans. And it's actually Zio Bankers. I said, you
Speaker 2: totally missed my point, dude. He actually thought that my
Speaker 2: point in this post was that libertarians are the ones
Speaker 2: that are getting elected and passing legislation and ruining the country.
Speaker 2: That's not the point of this post. And I'm kind
Speaker 2: of I mean, I'm not trying to be mean to
Speaker 2: this guy, but it's like, come on, dude, Obviously I'm
Speaker 2: not saying libertarian politicians cause this I am talking about
Speaker 2: the philosophy of libertarian ideas, which is leftism in the
Speaker 2: sense of open borders. The number one pushers all the
Speaker 2: way back to remember ten years ago when Stefan Malinu,
Speaker 2: before he was more based than he was, all he
Speaker 2: would talk about was libertarian open borders because the state
Speaker 2: is stealing when they have borders. It's a lie. It's
Speaker 2: just remember what would they say, lines drawn on a map,
Speaker 2: Lines drawing on the map. Libertarians were the ones pushing
Speaker 2: the open borders for the last thirty plus years, saying
Speaker 2: it's just lines drawn on a map. That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: Obviously I'm not saying libertarian politicians.
Speaker 6: Dude.
Speaker 2: Come on. And ironically, it was the Democrats twenty plus
Speaker 2: years ago, who were correct on the border issue. Everybody
Speaker 2: has seen it a million times. It was Bill Clinton.
Speaker 2: We've got to deport these people. We've got to close
Speaker 2: the borders, protect the borders. I want to say my presidency,
Speaker 2: we will close borders before Obama deported tons of people
Speaker 2: because it was a Democrat position. I'm not a Democrat.
Speaker 2: I go with what's the correct position. Thank you, Cato Institute,
Speaker 2: Libertarian Institute, Open Borders. And so these goobers think that
Speaker 2: I'm talking about what they think is running just the
Speaker 2: politicians are running shit. And how about you talk about
Speaker 2: the Zionists. None of these were liberturned. Come on, dude,
Speaker 2: this is why we don't get anything done, is that
Speaker 2: people just have no idea what other people are even
Speaker 2: talking about. People are operating on two totally different levels
Speaker 2: of what they're talking about, and the other people have
Speaker 2: no clue. JB. Peltasen froudos Jay, you don't get it.
Speaker 2: You just need to complimentalize exactly exactly. I am talking
Speaker 2: about neo conservative push for neoliberal libertarian economic theory. That's
Speaker 2: what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about the libertarian
Speaker 2: party and the minimal effect that any of those goofballs
Speaker 2: have had on anything. I said the same thing about Bustamante.
Speaker 2: I was like Bustamante at one point in that debate
Speaker 2: that we analyzed, I said, he sounds like a libertarian.
Speaker 2: Manto was a libertarian. He was, man. It's like, do
Speaker 2: you remember the debate with the last two libertarians that
Speaker 2: we debated, No, no, excuse me, Derek myth vision wasn't libertarian.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking of Austin Peterson, probably the stupidest person next
Speaker 2: to t Dump or not so erudite. Do you remember
Speaker 2: this train wreck of a debate? It went from bad
Speaker 2: to worse, and this guy was like the most normy
Speaker 2: pilled just like send them up. I was actually shocked
Speaker 2: in the middle of this debate as the conversation progressed
Speaker 2: how normy this guy actually was, and it got so
Speaker 2: bad that he the guy muted me. I don't mean
Speaker 2: Jimbob because I was on Jim Bob stream. I'm saying
Speaker 2: aus Austin Pon muted me so that he didn't have
Speaker 2: to hear anything I was saying in a debate with him.
Speaker 2: It was it was like I've never had that, This
Speaker 2: is this is a first. This guy was the worst debate.
Speaker 2: He's in the top five worst debates. And if you
Speaker 2: didn't watch this one, you should watch it because if
Speaker 2: you want to see the absolute rank idiocy of the
Speaker 2: average libertarian, this is it. This is it. This was
Speaker 2: something else. So, uh, speaking of libertarians, David Knight was
Speaker 2: sounding off, and I've never I'll be honest with you,
Speaker 2: I've never listened to David Knight. I'm not mad at
Speaker 2: David Knight. There's no info Wars drama. I don't I
Speaker 2: was never really doing anything. I don't think. I mean,
Speaker 2: I might have first hosted when David Knight was leaving
Speaker 2: somewhere or other, but I'm gonna be honest with it.
Speaker 2: Whenever David Knight took over, I tuned out because David
Speaker 2: Knight is boring. He is so boring. I'm sure he's
Speaker 2: a nice man. Maybe he means well. I don't know.
Speaker 2: Never talked to him, but he started going off on
Speaker 2: ice and I'm like, you're a boomer aged man, and
Speaker 2: you have a seventeen year old's philosophy of liberty. What
Speaker 2: boomer still believes in seventeen year old libertarian philosophy? And
Speaker 2: so I called him out on that and he got
Speaker 2: mad and said okay, little boy, grow up. Because I said, okay, Boomer,
Speaker 2: and I said, how about you come and actually debate
Speaker 2: me on your libertarian you're ridiculous libertarian philosophy. And then
Speaker 2: I hit him with what I always called it. I
Speaker 2: was called him David Knight will because that Boomer put
Speaker 2: my ass to sleep when he started talking talk about
Speaker 2: boring ass show dude. So this is what this is
Speaker 2: why things don't change. The intellectuals and the smart people
Speaker 2: that we deal with. Even the smart people are dummies.
Speaker 2: Even the smart alternative media who can figure out half
Speaker 2: of what's going on are still dummies. You cannot have
Speaker 2: a society that doesn't have the use of force. The
Speaker 2: NAP dude, Nap dude.
Speaker 6: If we just convince everybody or the NAP, then we'll
Speaker 6: have a free, voluntary to thaeity.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Really, is that realistic? We're gonna convince the world
Speaker 2: of the NAP and have a voluntary society? Is that?
Speaker 2: Is that realistic? I'm not a Boomer. I'm a straight
Speaker 2: old millennial dog. David se dead SI for eighteen? Is
Speaker 2: that Israeli currency? What is that? I don't know what
Speaker 2: that is. I hope you answer me, because nobody else
Speaker 2: has answered me. I'm stuck. Okay, well, I'm not to
Speaker 2: your question yet. Let's see David Essi says for one
Speaker 2: hundred and seventy nine, whatever that currency is. Why did
Speaker 2: you Why Eusebius didn't say in the name of Father, Son,
Speaker 2: and Spirit. In the Bible, we don't see the apostle
Speaker 2: baptized in trinity. Like if Jesus said to do it
Speaker 2: one way, why do we see it other ways? Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: this has been brought up a lot of times by
Speaker 2: modalist Pentecostals. They think that when the Book of Acts
Speaker 2: says in the name of Christ or in the name
Speaker 2: of Jesus, they think that that's a formula. It's not
Speaker 2: a formula. It's just stating in summation what the baptism is.
Speaker 2: So the baptism is trinitarian, but it's just in the
Speaker 2: Book of Acts encapsulating that by saying in the name
Speaker 2: of Jesus. It's not literally, the Book of Acts is
Speaker 2: not giving you a formula. Plus, there's many things that
Speaker 2: happen in the Book of Acts that are only for
Speaker 2: that time because it's a transition period. For example, at
Speaker 2: one point Paul takes Timothy and circumcises him so that
Speaker 2: they can go to the Temple. But he only did
Speaker 2: that because that was still in the transition period when
Speaker 2: Christians and newly converted Jews were still worshiping at the Temple. Right,
Speaker 2: So after the Temple's destroyed, there's not really any purpose
Speaker 2: or use in worshiping at the temple right because there's
Speaker 2: no temple. Pentecost right, Pentecost is a one time event
Speaker 2: in redemptive history. In Acts too, that fulfills the Book
Speaker 2: of Joel. Joel is predicting what's happening at Pentecost. In
Speaker 2: Acts two, Joel is not predicting a end of the
Speaker 2: world last days. The last Days is what happens in
Speaker 2: Acts two. Jesus brings the last days at his first advent.
Speaker 2: So I'm not knocking your question, but it is a
Speaker 2: question that's usually brought by one this Pentecostals are modalists.
Speaker 2: But the question rests on those two assumptions that number one,
Speaker 2: the Book of Acts is giving a specific ritual formula,
Speaker 2: it's not, And that everything in the Book of Acts
Speaker 2: is normative for everything in the rest of the history
Speaker 2: of the Church. It's not. Yeah, that's fine. You can
Speaker 2: ask those questions, but that's typically the answer that we give.
Speaker 2: I just was laughing because I didn't recognize the currency.
Speaker 2: It's it looks Hebrew, but it's like some of the
Speaker 2: Asian currencies. If somebody super chats from Asia, it also
Speaker 2: kind of looks like that. All right, let's see. Oh wait,
Speaker 2: we got more over here it says bob Dog ten dollars.
Speaker 2: Do you think the British stry artist banks See is
Speaker 2: a syop? It could be. I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, with a lot of those kind of mainline
Speaker 2: leftist performance art, what do you call it, like art activism,
Speaker 2: usually that's not organic. I mean, it can be, but
Speaker 2: it's a it's a good question, but I haven't really
Speaker 2: I mean, I've seen Banksy's art over the years, and
Speaker 2: sometimes it's saying good stuff. But I mean, nowadays, I
Speaker 2: think everybody's pretty much skeptical of everything in terms of authenticity.
Speaker 2: That five dollars. You aren't broadly popular on the right
Speaker 2: because you have a message that takes brain power to
Speaker 2: come comprementalize. Well, you know, I'm starting to realize that
Speaker 2: because you know, as Goofy and kind of as silly
Speaker 2: as candaes like. I think, like that's what it actually takes,
Speaker 2: I guess to be popular, right. I think one time
Speaker 2: Henry Kissinger said something like being high IQ can actually
Speaker 2: be a detriment. So supa psion gin j ten dollars.
Speaker 2: They've been psychologically decapitated through constant mind grape. It makes
Speaker 2: me feel sad for people. We need an orthodox empire. Well,
Speaker 2: I don't think any political solution is gonna come in
Speaker 2: our lifetime, and there are no really political solutions anyway.
Speaker 2: But I mean, it would certainly be nice if we
Speaker 2: had Christian principles governing things, but we don't groove monster
Speaker 2: ten dollars, Thank you for everything. Do you think that
Speaker 2: what Trump is doing in the Western hemisphere has continuity
Speaker 2: with Nelson Rockefeller's hemisphere economic plan? The Rockfeller Report on
Speaker 2: the Americas came to mind immediately when this started. Uh, there
Speaker 2: probably is some over a lot with older geopolitical strategies
Speaker 2: of those kind of you know, grandparent boomer people, and
Speaker 2: Trump is still a boomer, so boomers are still in power.
Speaker 2: I'm saying, so probably there is overlap with that Kissinger era,
Speaker 2: because I mean Kissinger, remember Christener just died, so you know,
Speaker 2: we're still operating on those Kissinger Rockefeller era programs. So
Speaker 2: probably groove monster ten dollars. I know, Sir Halfard Mackinder
Speaker 2: viewed the Americas in the western hemisphere as its own
Speaker 2: world island, apart from the world island that contains the Heartland. Yeah. Interesting,
Speaker 2: I didn't recall that. I'm not doubting you, but that's
Speaker 2: that's a good point. I didn't even know if the
Speaker 2: top of my head what Mackinder would have said about
Speaker 2: Latin South America. But I think for American geostrategic interests,
Speaker 2: they probably just see it as purely a pragmatic necessity.
Speaker 2: But also I think we did show on this a
Speaker 2: few weeks ago, Like probably also with Trump, there is
Speaker 2: this there might be a desire for resources or the
Speaker 2: attaining of resources like oil and such, because of the
Speaker 2: terrible state of the American economy. I mean, if we
Speaker 2: don't get rid of the Federal Reserve, the economy will
Speaker 2: never be fixed, and it doesn't look like you can
Speaker 2: ever even pay the debt. So I think some people
Speaker 2: have opined that perhaps the appropriating of other countries' resources
Speaker 2: is due to the devastating effects of quantitative easing and
Speaker 2: if you have money printing and the inflation cobra five dollars.
Speaker 2: The Ripper Crew was also connected. They were a Satanic
Speaker 2: murder cult. The leader I think worked with Gaycy. I
Speaker 2: did a show covering the Ripper Crew, so I don't
Speaker 2: recall if I connected it to Gasey, but I did
Speaker 2: know that they were involved in Satanism. And I don't
Speaker 2: remember which podcast discussed the Ripper Crew, but we did
Speaker 2: in the Serial Killer installments, we do talk about the
Speaker 2: Ripper Crew. But thank you for reminding me of that.
Speaker 2: Let's see who's next, Matt Scraggin's five dollars Romcal there's
Speaker 2: going to be happy that they can finally be out
Speaker 2: of the closet and unanimously for the first time become
Speaker 2: fake and gay okay elephants never ending five dollars. Libertarians
Speaker 2: claim that they were against communism, but their policies that
Speaker 2: are literally playing in the hands of fabian communists. Well, actually,
Speaker 2: libertarianism and communism have a lot of commonalities and there
Speaker 2: are two dialectical sides of the same problem. Even A. C.
Speaker 2: Wells admitted that as a communist, he said, libertarians are
Speaker 2: not our enemies, they will actually build the world that
Speaker 2: we will take over. And he even says, I want
Speaker 2: to say it's either open the conspiracy or a new
Speaker 2: world order, where he says that what's a federal reserve?
Speaker 2: Have you looked into the seven sixty four? Yeah, I've
Speaker 2: interviewed BX on that. So Steve Jesus twenty dollars, Jay,
Speaker 2: do you think the emphasis on studying science and technology
Speaker 2: and not the classics is part of a intentional sy op?
Speaker 2: Partly yes, but also it's the natural progression of a
Speaker 2: society going into information age. So I think just for
Speaker 2: monetary purposes, most people don't think that there's any point
Speaker 2: in studying the arts because you're not going to make
Speaker 2: money from it. So there's a monetary incentive, But also
Speaker 2: there is I think an engineered dumbing down to the
Speaker 2: populace to not learn, say the basic informal fallacies, because
Speaker 2: I mean most grad students, college degree people that I've met,
Speaker 2: even in academic fields, they don't know the fallacies. You
Speaker 2: think that would be like college one on one Gravio
Speaker 2: send dollars. Wasn't a Christian holiday back then to forgive debts? Well,
Speaker 2: that's even a Jewish holiday. Even in the Torah you
Speaker 2: have the Jubileese where you forgive debts. And then I
Speaker 2: think at various points in Christian history, various Christian nations
Speaker 2: have appropriate to that and done things like the forgiving
Speaker 2: of debts. So I think you're correct. So it's very easy.
Speaker 2: We become a Christian nation and then we forgive all
Speaker 2: the debts, we wipe out all the debts. Or we
Speaker 2: could just say that the Federal Reserve was passed through
Speaker 2: fraud and it is a giant fraudulent system, and so
Speaker 2: we crossed it out as criminal racketeering, and you don't
Speaker 2: ow we just canceled out because we don't owe two
Speaker 2: bunch of criminals. How's that classified as racketeering. It's like,
Speaker 2: do I owe Tonyo Soprano all the you know, the
Speaker 2: protection money? Well, it's like Tony Sprano comes and says,
Speaker 2: you owe me for the past one hundred years of
Speaker 2: the protection money you haven't paid. Do you're a criminal?
Speaker 2: I don't owe you. You could get laos. I wanted
Speaker 2: to say, there's one other thing I was looking to cover.
Speaker 2: What was it? Let me look at my notes, make
Speaker 2: sure I got to everything today. Yeah, we covered all that,
Speaker 2: I think we hit everything that I wanted to cover.
Speaker 2: Today I did a discussion with Josie from Tim Cast
Speaker 2: on Christian Zionism. If you didn't know about that, you
Speaker 2: can go check that out. You guys can check out
Speaker 2: my Reputation of Islam with Kai Well. It's it's a
Speaker 2: series on the geopolitics of Islam. So if you didn't
Speaker 2: watch that, this was the last podcast that we did.
Speaker 2: Remember Tomorrow we're doing a movie stream with Jimbob. Would
Speaker 2: be covering David Fincher's The Killer and Under the Silver Lake,
Speaker 2: the cult classic conspiracy film that has quite a bit
Speaker 2: too decode. We covered that when it came out about
Speaker 2: six years ago with Tristan and we're gonna revisit it
Speaker 2: with Jimbob. Gravios twenty dollars. I guess that works become
Speaker 2: a proper Christian nation first too, though, right look, I
Speaker 2: think we just need to focus on converting people to Orthodoxy.
Speaker 2: And you know politics is downstream from all that, So
Speaker 2: you know a lot of people there's zealots. They think
Speaker 2: they're going to fix the world through politics first, and
Speaker 2: they try to make Jesus into some political poster boy,
Speaker 2: and it's the other way around. Dude, Hi, are you
Speaker 2: a boomer suposed to have this? I'm not a boomer,
Speaker 2: just got fancy genetics. The only boomer thing I can
Speaker 2: think of is that we like Florida. But there's there's
Speaker 2: nothing else boomer in this in this vicinity, dude. Bitcoin
Speaker 2: boomers don't get bitcoin.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 2: My job is Internet. Boomers don't live stream as a
Speaker 2: job on Internet. I play video games, do game streams.
Speaker 2: Bad boomers don't do that. There's like one boomer in
Speaker 2: the world that does it.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: I write books on movies. Boomers don't do that. Maybe
Speaker 2: some boomers do. But when is your long hair coming back?
Speaker 2: It's probably not gonna come back. I feel like it
Speaker 2: just didn't really look right.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I feel like I look a little bit better with
Speaker 2: short hair. So, I mean it was fun. I enjoyed
Speaker 2: growing it out, but right wing knuck seven dollars. I've
Speaker 2: been reading Dugan's fourth Political Theory. How does Dugan ground
Speaker 2: noetically while fostering relationships with Hinkle and Hawes. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: mean there's a lot of things I don't get from
Speaker 2: the Dugan sphere and things I disagree with, But I
Speaker 2: think he thinks that anything it's worth aligning with anything
Speaker 2: that's against Western liberalism, plump Boomer or plump booty. Michael
Speaker 2: Savage does. Well. He's a radio host though, so I
Speaker 2: mean technically I think he's retired from radio now, but
Speaker 2: I mean he was like, that's peak Boomer is being
Speaker 2: a radio host dude, So he's not actually primarily an
Speaker 2: Internet dude. Guys, remember to heading over to chalk dot com,
Speaker 2: choq dot com, the best and supplementation on the Internet,
Speaker 2: and pray for our country. It's very important that we
Speaker 2: pray for our country, because if we don't have borders
Speaker 2: and walls, we have no USA at all, no borters,
Speaker 2: no walls, no USA at all. Coping twenty four seven
Speaker 2: fifteen dollars, Jay, Do you think libertarians are uniquely vulnerable
Speaker 2: to the ideological aims of Islamic state. Yes, In fact,
Speaker 2: that's something I've said in many podcasts over the years,
Speaker 2: So I totally agree. Medica is looking into Orthodoxy. Oh cool.
Speaker 2: I remember I actually remember super chatting Medica over the
Speaker 2: years saying, hey, check check out Orthodoxy. Looking at orthodox
Speaker 2: you might check it out. So I've actually prayed for
Speaker 2: Medica to look at Orthodox that's good. That's a good news.
Speaker 2: He gave a shout out on his last stream. Well, hey,
Speaker 2: thanks man. I've watched medical streams over the last several
Speaker 2: all the way back to Bloods four days. I don't
Speaker 2: think I've ever talked to them on a stream, but
Speaker 2: I have sent him some super chats. But remember that
Speaker 2: the show sponsor is Chalk dot com c hoq dot
Speaker 2: com bestment supplementation on the Internet. You can get all
Speaker 2: of your supplement needs through Chalk dot com. Use the
Speaker 2: promo go J sixty Life as JAY six zero l
Speaker 2: I f E J sixty Life, and that includes the
Speaker 2: performance stack that includes anything over here in terms of
Speaker 2: male vitality. This is workout adjacent that These aren't peepe pills,
Speaker 2: although the tonktale will boost test sasterom. You don't have
Speaker 2: to buy that performance stack, but you do get sixty
Speaker 2: percent off. But you can also buy any of these individually,
Speaker 2: so you can if you're a lady, you can look
Speaker 2: into shie l legit Ashwaganda Irish moss that has to
Speaker 2: do with a female hormone vitality. All of that systems,
Speaker 2: all them pipes working, and you can also architecturalize and
Speaker 2: compartmentalize way, how does she say it? Compart compart I
Speaker 2: can't even think of how she said it wrong. I
Speaker 2: can't how does she say it? Let's see comperimentalize. If
Speaker 2: you need to compermentalize, head on over to chalk dot com.
Speaker 2: You said pro code Chase sixty life and they can
Speaker 2: architecturalize all of your body needs. Otherwise, you can get
Speaker 2: the books in the shop at Jasonelsons dot com. All
Speaker 2: my great Hollywood trilogy there Jamie's books. By the way,
Speaker 2: some people are still waiting on some of the books.
Speaker 2: I should mention why that is. It's actually Jeffrey Bazas's fault.
Speaker 2: So this is a Bezos thing. Turns out Jamie's books
Speaker 2: are delayed for two weeks, so we expect them. I
Speaker 2: think it would have been one week and Jamie's books
Speaker 2: would have come, But then and the snowstorm happened. I
Speaker 2: think it delayed it. More so. Jamie's book Operation Culture
Speaker 2: Creation Too and Hollywood Mind Control are delayed because they
Speaker 2: come from Bezos, so Jamie published those through the whatever
Speaker 2: Bezos Amazon publishing thing is. So usually it takes two
Speaker 2: weeks when Jamie orders for books to come, but this
Speaker 2: has been a disaster, and it's been a month. So
Speaker 2: I have not forgotten the thirty orders or so that
Speaker 2: have Jamie's books on there. But if you haven't gotten
Speaker 2: your order, this is why. It is not because we're
Speaker 2: lazy and we don't trying to steal your book money
Speaker 2: or anything like that. It's because of the storm and
Speaker 2: because of Amazon delayed to print the books. So you
Speaker 2: will get it. I promise. I know that many people
Speaker 2: have waited for a really long time. I apologize. If
Speaker 2: it was up to me, I would get your books
Speaker 2: right away. Let's see who else.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: I think that's everybody. Appreciate everybody tuning in. All the
Speaker 2: super chats had a lot of We had a large
Speaker 2: audience tonight. Thank you guys so much. Let me see
Speaker 2: if I can dump y'all into somebody else. Because I
Speaker 2: need to be getting to the how to doing this.
Speaker 2: I forget how to do it sometimes. We got up
Speaker 2: to seventeen hundred tonight. I think let's see we can
Speaker 2: go over here and to redirect. Let's see who is anybody?
Speaker 2: Is anybody pumping it out tonight? Let's see who's up.
Speaker 2: I don't see any of our people bla Win's Bla
Speaker 2: doing his show that's not until tomorrow, So I guess
Speaker 2: I'm the only person streaming tonight. Let's see, Jamie's got
Speaker 2: a show coming up. What doesn't let me pick those?
Speaker 2: All right? All right, well, thank you guys so much.
Speaker 2: It's Cleaves streaming. No, you already streamed earlier, Rob nor
Speaker 2: Cleave's over. Let's see is Rob streaming on Crucible? Where
Speaker 2: is he? What the heck? Why is this not working?
Speaker 2: Just keeps freezing. I don't see Crucible. All right, well,
Speaker 2: I'll dump you all into somebody else next time. Thank
Speaker 2: you all for showing up. Great, great crowd tonight. Really
Speaker 2: glad to have. I think we got up to seventeen
Speaker 2: hundred tonight. Otherwise, hit like and share everybody, have a
Speaker 2: good night.