Speaker 1: Escape Tomorrow Rubber Resort. Hey everyone, this is Jack Fairshawd's
Speaker 1: the Right Side Radio program and License reviewed, and I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you for a second about my pillow.
Speaker 1: My pillow is quite simply the finest pillow on the market.
Speaker 1: My pillows patented interlocking fills adjust to your individual sleep
Speaker 1: needs regardless of sleeping position. This innovative fill then holds
Speaker 1: that position all night, helping you fall asleep faster, stay
Speaker 1: asleep longer. The founder and owner of Mine Pillow, Mike Lindell,
Speaker 1: personally guarantees that my Pillow will be the most comfortable
Speaker 1: pillow you'll ever own, and I'll add my own guarantee
Speaker 1: as well. And right now you can get up to
Speaker 1: eighty percent off of all My Pillow products, including bed sheets, slippers, towels,
Speaker 1: down comforters, mattress toppers, even coffee when you go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com and enter the special promo code
Speaker 1: Midnight Ride no space in between Midnight and Ride and
Speaker 1: remember enter the promo code m I D N I
Speaker 1: G H t R I D E and save big
Speaker 1: while getting the best night's sleep you've ever had. This
Speaker 1: show is a part of the Midnight Ride Network. Sam
Speaker 1: put your name at the time of nd A statue
Speaker 1: started Chicken and eagle fly Tennis gonna be here, win
Speaker 1: you him out three starting feel and it will be
Speaker 1: like the whole man is nain and down broughtie courtesy
Speaker 1: and wild and liberals be worn. Your viewpoints will be
Speaker 1: subjected to straight scrutiny. You're listening to Right Side Radios
Speaker 1: like my eyes have been blown wide. We have come
Speaker 1: together here because the American people deserve better from those
Speaker 1: to whom they entrust our nation's highest offices. We stand
Speaker 1: united and are resolved to do something about it, which,
Speaker 1: whether we like it or not spelled JUNI, you and
Speaker 1: I have a rendezvous with destiny. You tuned into right
Speaker 1: Side Radio? All right, guys, you have found it. It
Speaker 1: is the Right Side Radio program coming to you this week.
Speaker 1: Recording this episode on Thursday, February the thirteenth, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: Of course, we're a day later than our usual record date.
Speaker 1: That's because last night we recorded the latest episode of
Speaker 1: Chris McDaniels America, which you can go to YouTube and view.
Speaker 1: You can go to Center McDaniel's Facebook page. You can
Speaker 1: go to the Midnight Rides Facebook page to the Midnight
Speaker 1: Rides Twitter account. We are everywhere that you would want
Speaker 1: to find us. I think it's a stellar episode. I
Speaker 1: think it's one that had a lot of fun. We
Speaker 1: had a moment during the episode where tornado bells went off,
Speaker 1: so that got interesting. But I think one of the
Speaker 1: biggest highlights was when Chris's youngest son, Chamberlain, called in
Speaker 1: after the tornado warnings came through. So it's like I said,
Speaker 1: it was a fun episode. Some very important information talked about,
Speaker 1: especially for those of us in the state of Mississippi.
Speaker 1: I don't want to talk for a second before I
Speaker 1: get into other topics about this whole debate over early voting.
Speaker 1: Now you can hear more details about why early voting
Speaker 1: is not necessarily the good thing that some believe that
Speaker 1: it is mostly Democrats, but and there have been a
Speaker 1: few Republicans out there who have fallen for the idea
Speaker 1: of early voting. I'm here to tell you that there's
Speaker 1: a major problem with early voting. And this one again,
Speaker 1: fraud becomes easier under early voting. That we know, no
Speaker 1: matter how much they try to pretend that it doesn't,
Speaker 1: it does. But the biggest problem I have with early
Speaker 1: voting is what happens if you vote forty five days early,
Speaker 1: and you go to the poll, you cast that vote
Speaker 1: for the candidate that you believe is the right guy
Speaker 1: for the job, and then you find out some information
Speaker 1: that proves to you he's not the right person. But
Speaker 1: you've already vot voted. You don't get to go back
Speaker 1: and take that vote back. You don't get to march
Speaker 1: down there and say, you know what, I made a mistake.
Speaker 1: I need to vote now. No, we have an election day.
Speaker 1: It's called election day, not election forty five days. The
Speaker 1: fact is, if you're unable to get to the polls,
Speaker 1: there are arrangements that can be made. But most people
Speaker 1: they're not early voting because of a real reason. They're
Speaker 1: early voting because they don't want to be inconvenienced on
Speaker 1: election day. And that's silly, that's ridiculous. I'm one of
Speaker 1: the ones who fully supports the idea of election Day
Speaker 1: becoming a national holiday, give everybody the day off of work,
Speaker 1: take away that excuse to not go vote. Plus, when
Speaker 1: you look at the demographics of early voting, it is
Speaker 1: disproportionately something that benefits more heavily populated Democrat regions of
Speaker 1: the country. So if you're a Republican and you're pushing
Speaker 1: for early voting, you're pushing to elect more Democrats. I
Speaker 1: don't care what you say. I understand that some of
Speaker 1: you don't have very thick skin. But you're willing to
Speaker 1: go and break bread with Democrats on this issue. Will
Speaker 1: toughen up their buttercup, because it's about time that people
Speaker 1: call out fake, weak need Republicans. It's about time that
Speaker 1: folks start to punch these Republicans that sell us out
Speaker 1: every time they get a chance. They don't have a
Speaker 1: principal bone in their body and they know it. And yes, sir,
Speaker 1: if you're wondering, if you're listening in the statements, yes
Speaker 1: I am talking about Senator Jeremy England when I say
Speaker 1: that it's someone that doesn't have a conservative bone in
Speaker 1: their body. Now he can sell you on that, he
Speaker 1: can pretend that he's a conservative, but he's a thin
Speaker 1: skinned little weasel who is now filling the pressure because
Speaker 1: Governor Tate Reeves called him out. Then Chris McDaniel called
Speaker 1: him out. And I'm glad that they have because they're
Speaker 1: exposing his terrible idea and his willingness to work with
Speaker 1: the Democrats on an issue that will not benefit the
Speaker 1: greater good in the slightest. The answer to trying to
Speaker 1: up our voting turnout is not saying, hey, how about
Speaker 1: we let you just start voting forty five days early.
Speaker 1: How about we start letting you vote thirty day. No,
Speaker 1: let's go to election day. And I'm sorry, I'm one
Speaker 1: of those people that thinks that if you're not motivated
Speaker 1: enough to go and actually vote on the day that
Speaker 1: is designated for you to go vote, then tough. There
Speaker 1: are exceptions that can be made military, so there are
Speaker 1: absolutely some exceptions out there. Absentee is a perfectly okay
Speaker 1: way to vote if you know that you're not going
Speaker 1: to be available on election day. But apparently that's not
Speaker 1: good enough anyway anymore, despite the fact that it worked
Speaker 1: fine for years. I'm not a fan of votes. I'm
Speaker 1: not a fan of these ideas that open themselves up
Speaker 1: for fraud. But my biggest objection again is how many
Speaker 1: times down the stretch has something come out that is
Speaker 1: maybe made you rethink things the other thing, And this
Speaker 1: was pointed out by Chris McDaniel on Chris McDaniel's America.
Speaker 1: So I apologize if you've already seen that. And this
Speaker 1: sounds like repeating, but it needs to be repeated. Early
Speaker 1: voting heavily favors the incumbent. The incumbent already has a
Speaker 1: war chest, he already has lots and lots of money.
Speaker 1: If you're going to make early voting a thing, these
Speaker 1: insurgent candidates, these folks that are willing to step out
Speaker 1: there and challenge an incumbent, they no longer can do
Speaker 1: that as easily because they don't have a lot of money.
Speaker 1: They definitely don't usually have the amount of money that
Speaker 1: the incumbent has. So for them, there's a strategy involved
Speaker 1: to where they want to hit the final week two
Speaker 1: week blitz and try to really spend their money. More Wisely,
Speaker 1: if you open up voting forty five to thirty days early,
Speaker 1: they're going to have to start sooner, which means they're
Speaker 1: going to have to have double to triple the amount
Speaker 1: of money in order to even have a shot at
Speaker 1: beating an incumbent. So there's another element here that again
Speaker 1: the politicians don't want to talk about because they understand
Speaker 1: this can protect their next because they're the ones with
Speaker 1: all the money. They're the ones they're going to have
Speaker 1: the best shot to be able to spend insane's amount
Speaker 1: of cash throughout the election cycle. They don't have to
Speaker 1: wait till the final week or two to have a
Speaker 1: major blitz. No, they can do it the entire time
Speaker 1: because they have that war chest. So that's another problem
Speaker 1: that we have is the fact that they don't want
Speaker 1: to make the election fair. They say this is about
Speaker 1: helping the people, but don't buy it for a second.
Speaker 1: This is about helping themselves. This is about ensuring that
Speaker 1: they will be reelected time and time again. The sad
Speaker 1: reality is they're probably gonna get reelected anyway because people
Speaker 1: don't pay attention the way that they should. That's frustrating.
Speaker 1: You know that I talk about that from time to
Speaker 1: time on this show. You've heard me multiple times talk
Speaker 1: about how they are not necessarily paying as close attention
Speaker 1: as they should, in many cases, aren't paying attention at all.
Speaker 1: And if we're going to open up the voting that
Speaker 1: much earlier, then guess what, You're going to have more
Speaker 1: uninformed voters showing up at the polls. So no, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: this is not something I'll ever get on board with.
Speaker 1: This is not something that I can ever support, and
Speaker 1: it shouldn't be something that the Republicans and Mississippi are pushing,
Speaker 1: but sadly it is. And we know why. I've said
Speaker 1: it before. I tried to convince people to not vote
Speaker 1: for him. But my home state, the state of Mississippi,
Speaker 1: has a lieutenant governor who, even though he has an
Speaker 1: R beside his name, Delbert Hosman, is a true Democrat
Speaker 1: and every time you see a policy, you can see that.
Speaker 1: Just look at the Senates tax plan. You know, the
Speaker 1: House put out a plan that was going to completely
Speaker 1: eliminate the state income tax. Not the Senate. They'll reduce
Speaker 1: its song, but Delbert Hoseman has no intention of doing
Speaker 1: away with the state income tax. We told you people
Speaker 1: that you didn't want to listen, but time and time again,
Speaker 1: this man proves who he is. But you voted for
Speaker 1: him because you were too stupid to actually do any
Speaker 1: research about his actual record. It was there. He's a mean,
Speaker 1: vindictive man. You don't believe he's vindictive. He had one
Speaker 1: of his members of the Hoseman goon squad, tried to
Speaker 1: regulate our state auditor's powers merely because the current state
Speaker 1: auditor has been rumored for a long time to want
Speaker 1: to run against Delbert Houseman for governor. That's who he is,
Speaker 1: that's who he's always been, but you didn't want to listen.
Speaker 1: And now we're stuck with him for a few more years,
Speaker 1: maybe even longer than that if he does win the
Speaker 1: governor's mansion. This is a frustrating time in my state.
Speaker 1: And I apologize to our national listeners who may not
Speaker 1: care about what I'm talking about happening in the state
Speaker 1: of Mississippi, but you should, because I can promise you this.
Speaker 1: Your state probably has a lot of Republicans in name
Speaker 1: only the rhinos, the ones who put that conservative in
Speaker 1: big bold on their push cards. They tell you that
Speaker 1: they're a conservative, but they're not. You know who they are. Now.
Speaker 1: Maybe your state's lucky and it's not controlled by them,
Speaker 1: but it could be one day, especially if one of
Speaker 1: them has you more hoodwinked and they get in power.
Speaker 1: Are they getting the right position? And the next thing
Speaker 1: you know, you're looking up in your state isn't the
Speaker 1: conservative state that you thought you elected. That's what happened
Speaker 1: here in Mississippi, and that can happen in other states.
Speaker 1: It's one hundred percent a possibility and could become a
Speaker 1: reality anywhere. Now, if you live in a liberal wackado state,
Speaker 1: you know you're probably okay with that because you're a
Speaker 1: liberal wackadoo. Again. I just want to see Republicans adhere
Speaker 1: to their own party platform. There was a time in
Speaker 1: my life that I was very much a proud Republican.
Speaker 1: I'm a three time delicate to the state Convention, and
Speaker 1: yet my disgust with the current state of my own
Speaker 1: state's Republican party led me away from being a part
Speaker 1: of it, wanting to serve on an executive committee, or
Speaker 1: being anywhere close to that. Stuff that's not on me,
Speaker 1: that's on them. Are there folks in our state that
Speaker 1: fly the Republican flag that I'm happy with? Sure, even
Speaker 1: though some of those I may have disagreed with from
Speaker 1: time to time. But the problem is when I look
Speaker 1: at a state Senate that is a majority and majority
Speaker 1: Republican body and they're pushing key Democrat platform issues over
Speaker 1: elimination of the state income tax. We don't want you
Speaker 1: to reduce it, Delbert Hoseman. We want you to eliminate it,
Speaker 1: but you don't want to do that. You won't do that.
Speaker 1: And as long as you got little bitty cronies like
Speaker 1: the Jeremy England's of the world, who will go around
Speaker 1: and carry the water and do whatever you tell them
Speaker 1: to do because they're spineless, gutless little whims, little whims
Speaker 1: who I'm sure are going to cry because somebody went
Speaker 1: on a podcast and bullied them. Yeah, be a man,
Speaker 1: Be a man, don't cry about being bullied. But sadly,
Speaker 1: I don't think you are one. I think you've proven
Speaker 1: that time and time again. Look, we're living an age now,
Speaker 1: and a lot of us learned about this because of
Speaker 1: that atrocious super Bowl halftime show, But we live in
Speaker 1: the age of the distrack, because apparently that was what
Speaker 1: one of the songs, or maybe two of the songs,
Speaker 1: or maybe the whole thing that that performer at the
Speaker 1: super Bowl was putting together. He was He's got beef
Speaker 1: with another rapper or something, and one of those songs
Speaker 1: was all about him. And even though I didn't enjoy
Speaker 1: the performance because it's it wasn't for me, and I
Speaker 1: can freely admit that wasn't for me, which begs the question,
Speaker 1: why was that the show that you would choose to
Speaker 1: put on the most watched program in our country. But
Speaker 1: I do respect the fact that the guy didn't care.
Speaker 1: He wanted his beef to be heard on the biggest
Speaker 1: stage imaginable, and he went right at that guy. So
Speaker 1: more props to you, More props to you. Now, please
Speaker 1: don't ever schedule him again to perform at the Super Bowl.
Speaker 1: I'm just again, is it too much to ask for
Speaker 1: the Republican Party to actually read its own platform and
Speaker 1: not just read it follow it? Is it too much
Speaker 1: to ask for the Republican to look at that platform
Speaker 1: and say, you know what, this is what it means
Speaker 1: to be a Republican, This is what it takes to
Speaker 1: be a Republican. Is it too much to ask that
Speaker 1: when politicians that have that are by their name do
Speaker 1: not adhere to the platform, that party leaders actually call
Speaker 1: them out ford and don't just try to protect them
Speaker 1: because they're an incumbent Republican. We were told when the
Speaker 1: Republican Party in our state started to gain ground and
Speaker 1: gain control that primaries were going to be a good thing.
Speaker 1: And yet if you watch the way that the state
Speaker 1: party acts towards any challenger of an incumbent, you know
Speaker 1: that they don't truly believe that primaries are a good
Speaker 1: thing because they do whatever they can to protect that incumbent,
Speaker 1: no matter how bad of a Republican he's been. He's
Speaker 1: an incumbent. We gotta fight for him. Why that's another
Speaker 1: Republican running against him, and we've already seen that he's
Speaker 1: not following the platform. Why why should you just fall
Speaker 1: in line and try to protect the incumbent. That's just
Speaker 1: what the state party always does. Again, to those of
Speaker 1: you who listen to this show outside of the state
Speaker 1: of Mississippi, that's probably happening in your state too, So
Speaker 1: you should be paying attention. There's so many things that
Speaker 1: need to be adjusted that need to be changed around
Speaker 1: about the election process in our country. There are so
Speaker 1: many things that are our nation, our states need to
Speaker 1: reconsider the fact that elections cost as much money as
Speaker 1: they cost nowadays. It is an unfair system that is
Speaker 1: rigged completely in favor of the incumbent. That's a problem.
Speaker 1: The fact that we've gotten to this means in which
Speaker 1: the candidate with the most money almost always wins. Sure,
Speaker 1: you get Cinderella stories here or there, you get an
Speaker 1: upset every now and then, but for the most part,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter how exceptional the challenger is. That incumbent
Speaker 1: will drop so much money on him, running negative ads
Speaker 1: with half truths and straight out lies, so that way
Speaker 1: they can try to spin the story that the challenge
Speaker 1: as just a bad guy, and you can trust me
Speaker 1: because you've always voted for me. You can trust me
Speaker 1: because I am your incumbent, and you will always follow
Speaker 1: what I want. That, my friends, is the biggest problem
Speaker 1: with the state, with the state, with this country, with
Speaker 1: elections in general. We have to come up with a
Speaker 1: way in which we give the voice back to the
Speaker 1: people and not to the biggest donors. I don't have
Speaker 1: a full answer. I mean, I know in sports there
Speaker 1: are salary gaps on teams where the Dallas Cowboys can't
Speaker 1: spend more than the Green Bay Packers, despite the fact
Speaker 1: that the Cowboys are any much larger market. But our
Speaker 1: elections are a lot more like Major League Baseball than
Speaker 1: the NFL because major League Baseball no salary cap. So
Speaker 1: the Los Angeles Dodgers, New York Yankees they can always
Speaker 1: outspend teams like the Kansas City Rules, the Tampa Bay Rays,
Speaker 1: they can always outspend them. That's exactly what you see
Speaker 1: playing out in the elections in our country. That's exactly
Speaker 1: what we see constantly when it comes to the elections
Speaker 1: in the United States of America. I don't know how
Speaker 1: a political salarycap would work, and if the politicians are
Speaker 1: in charge of setting it, it will be so high
Speaker 1: that they'll be able to to stay under it but
Speaker 1: still outspend their opponents. So as much of a pipe
Speaker 1: dream of an election's salary cap might be, the system
Speaker 1: will still rig itself against the challenger, still going to
Speaker 1: rig itself in favor of the incumbent. It's frustrating people.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why people lose hope. There's a reason
Speaker 1: why people stay home. And it's not because, as these
Speaker 1: early voter proponents want to try to pretend, it's not
Speaker 1: because they're forced to go vote on a single election day.
Speaker 1: I can promise you that's not why they're not voting.
Speaker 1: The reason they're not voting, and I must shock you
Speaker 1: here one is there already. They've already given up. They
Speaker 1: don't believe in the system. They don't believe that their
Speaker 1: vote's gonna matter. They don't believe that by going to
Speaker 1: the ballot box they can affect change and the probably
Speaker 1: the most common reason why people don't go vote at
Speaker 1: the polls. Yes, they're lazy. I'm sorry to say it,
Speaker 1: and I know that's gonna piss some people off who
Speaker 1: just don't you know, I got so much to do.
Speaker 1: I don't have time to vote. I don't have time
Speaker 1: to study the issues. Look, I've said this before on
Speaker 1: the show. If you don't know the issues, if you
Speaker 1: don't understand the candidates and what they stand for. Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm okay with you staying home. I don't want you
Speaker 1: to go vote because you're an uninformed voter and you're
Speaker 1: part of the problem. Uninformed voters who vote are one
Speaker 1: of the biggest problems in this country. But I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about uninformed voters who stay home. I'm about ones
Speaker 1: who are informed, they know enough, but they're too lazy
Speaker 1: to get off their butt and go. Giving them an
Speaker 1: extra forty five days that might change it for some
Speaker 1: of them. But voting is our civic duty. It's something
Speaker 1: we should do and going on election day is not
Speaker 1: that big of a sacrifice. It really isn't. And if
Speaker 1: it were turned into a national holiday, then it would
Speaker 1: become even less of a sacrifice for you. But you
Speaker 1: know what, there's still be several of you that would
Speaker 1: stay your butt at home. You'd still sit there because
Speaker 1: you know what, it's national holiday, you know what. Let's
Speaker 1: crank up the grill. Let's do this. I don't have
Speaker 1: to work, can't be troubled with going to the polls.
Speaker 1: It's frustrating people. We want to see more people involved
Speaker 1: in the election process, but we also want to make
Speaker 1: sure that those people that go vote are informed. And know,
Speaker 1: when I say informed, I don't mean agree with me wholeheartedly.
Speaker 1: I mean that if you're if you're a Republican and
Speaker 1: you believe in conservative principles, you're voting for the person,
Speaker 1: not the party, but the person that in aligns with
Speaker 1: your conservative values. And if you're a Democrat who is
Speaker 1: a liberal, you're voting for the person than in aligns
Speaker 1: with your values. That's the process. That's the way it's
Speaker 1: supposed to be. Sadly, we have gotten so far away
Speaker 1: from that. And the money and the amounts of money
Speaker 1: that incumbents are able to raise and just sit on
Speaker 1: through the sheer nature of holding that office. That is
Speaker 1: a major problem that is far bigger than any nonsensical
Speaker 1: argument anyone could make in favor of early voting. Let's
Speaker 1: do something meaningful if we're going to try to change
Speaker 1: things around and try to figure out a way to
Speaker 1: win back our country to get folks to vote, and
Speaker 1: not a parlor trick that is early voting nonsense. We're
Speaker 1: gonna pause right here for a quick commercial break. This
Speaker 1: episode is probably gonna be a little bit shorter this
Speaker 1: week due to the fact that, you know, again we
Speaker 1: had to record a day later, but we still wanted
Speaker 1: to get out the flagship episode for you guys this week.
Speaker 1: When we come back, I want to talk about joe
Speaker 1: Joey Bahar. She is in the news again and once
Speaker 1: again said something extremely stupid. Imagine that. This is the
Speaker 1: right Side Radio Program. Will be right back the Midnight Ride,
Speaker 1: the home of the anti establishment movement. This network features
Speaker 1: great programming such as Chris McDaniel's America, God and Country,
Speaker 1: The right Side Radio Show, Paul Revere's Liberty Layer, and
Speaker 1: many more coming soon. So check out the Midnight Ride today.
Speaker 1: Head to the Midnight Ride dot com and check out
Speaker 1: all the amazing content. All right, guys, welcome back here
Speaker 1: to the Right Side Radio Program and what will be
Speaker 1: the home stretch of the radio show, the final segment
Speaker 1: of the program today. Again, sorry, it's gonna be a
Speaker 1: little bit shorter episode this week. That is again due
Speaker 1: to yesterday having to record Chris McDaniels America. Of course,
Speaker 1: as I mentioned, I believe it was on the last episode.
Speaker 1: I just recently took a job with the Laurel Leader
Speaker 1: Call as a reporter, and you know, again we had
Speaker 1: some tornadoes touched down in a neighboring county, and of
Speaker 1: course that meant today we spent a lot of time
Speaker 1: working on stories in that coverage. But I also want
Speaker 1: to send my thoughts in prayers to those in Wayne County, Mississippi,
Speaker 1: that were affected by the storms that actually hit yesterday,
Speaker 1: day day before this was this episode was recorded, So
Speaker 1: thoughts and prayers to them. There a lot of families
Speaker 1: that lost their homes in these storms, and unfortunately we've
Speaker 1: got more storms coming in on Saturdays, so there's a
Speaker 1: possibility that we could be in for more rough weather.
Speaker 1: Hopefully it is nowhere near as rough as what we
Speaker 1: just saw, and hopefully the good people out there are
Speaker 1: helping these families who some lost everything, homes completely blown away,
Speaker 1: and we want to keep them in our thoughts and prayers.
Speaker 1: I do want to though, before we wrap this episode up,
Speaker 1: I want to want to talk about Joy Bayhar. You
Speaker 1: know Joy Bahar, bless her heart. She is allegedly a comedian,
Speaker 1: although I've never heard her say anything remotely funny. But
Speaker 1: she is a host of the View and she is probably,
Speaker 1: and this says a lot considering that show, she is
Speaker 1: probably one of the dumbest people on that show. Oh,
Speaker 1: I know there's somebody you say, Oh, you can't say that,
Speaker 1: that's too mean. I'm sorry, But I'm not sorry because
Speaker 1: Joy Behar is a blithering idiot. And if you don't
Speaker 1: believe me, just listen to her talk, because again, when
Speaker 1: you hear her speak, you know that you're dealing with
Speaker 1: a stupid person. Now she's complaining about America being named
Speaker 1: for some white guy. That's right. Now. Again, they were
Speaker 1: having a discussion about the name change of the Gulf
Speaker 1: of Mexico to the Gulf of America. Weaken debate whether
Speaker 1: or not that is a meaningful change or not another time,
Speaker 1: but she's making that she was having that debate, and
Speaker 1: then she goes off on some idiotic tangent about the
Speaker 1: name change and that it's offensive that a country that
Speaker 1: was settled by indigenous people is named after a white person.
Speaker 1: Joy And I say this with the utmost sincerity. Get
Speaker 1: out of the country if you don't like it, if
Speaker 1: you hate this country so much, if you can't stand
Speaker 1: the fact that America was named or some white guy,
Speaker 1: get out instead. You sit here and don't know how
Speaker 1: much money you make during the view. But I dare
Speaker 1: say that you're fairly wealthy. I dare say that despite
Speaker 1: your amazingly the amazing lack of talent that you have,
Speaker 1: that you have figured out a way to do okay
Speaker 1: for yourself. Yeah, you still love to complain about it.
Speaker 1: We're not changing the name of the United States of America. Look,
Speaker 1: I've gone on record, I'm not the biggest fan of
Speaker 1: changing the name of the Golf of Mexico to the
Speaker 1: Golf of America, mainly because I'm somebody that recalls from
Speaker 1: changing things that have been a certain way for a
Speaker 1: long time. Anyway, but it's crazy that this is a
Speaker 1: heel she wants to die on, and of course Mexico's
Speaker 1: president she is. She's upset with the name change as well,
Speaker 1: even getting mad at Google or changing it on their
Speaker 1: Google Maps. She's even threatening to file a civil suit.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but I don't think anyone cares what you think,
Speaker 1: especially not in this country. But she's offended. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: one good thing about it, because I just really don't
Speaker 1: care what the president of Mexico thinks. I really don't
Speaker 1: care about her opinion on this issue, and I don't
Speaker 1: like her trying to make legal threads over something as
Speaker 1: trivial about what Google puts on its maps. If you
Speaker 1: don't like it, tough, It's that simple. It is what
Speaker 1: it is. Move on, you know. In more news, there
Speaker 1: was a writer I believe it was for Glamour magazine
Speaker 1: who wanted to claim that during the Super Bowl, when
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift was shown on the video screen, she was booed.
Speaker 1: She wants to claim that it was another example of
Speaker 1: misogyny sexism. No, it was an example of Philadelphia fans
Speaker 1: booing the girlfriend of one of the opposing teams, the
Speaker 1: Kansas City Chief Star Players. It was another example of
Speaker 1: Philly fans boing a celebrity who showed up wearing the
Speaker 1: colors of the other team. Let's not forget that Philly
Speaker 1: fans are the same people who notoriously booed Santa Claus.
Speaker 1: Was that because they hate old people? Was that because
Speaker 1: they're fataphobes they don't like fat people. No, it's because
Speaker 1: Philly fans are the poster children for bad sports fans
Speaker 1: in America period. Let's also not forget that Taylor Swift
Speaker 1: inserted herself into politics last year when she endorsed Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: That endorsement also turned people off. It has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with misogyny or sexism or whatever crap they want
Speaker 1: to say. It has everything to do with the fact
Speaker 1: that she has become a polarizing figure. Yes, she has
Speaker 1: her adoring fans, but she also has a lot of
Speaker 1: people that are tired of her. She also has a
Speaker 1: ton of football fans that are tired of the constant
Speaker 1: cutaways to see her reaction in her luxury box. So yeah, Now,
Speaker 1: if I had been in the super Bowl Dome during
Speaker 1: the Super Bowl and they cut the screen and showed
Speaker 1: us Taylor Swip, I partaken in the booze. No, because
Speaker 1: I just don't care enough about her to even verbalize
Speaker 1: a boo I really don't. But at the same time,
Speaker 1: I'm going to defend those who did, because I honestly
Speaker 1: don't believe it has anything to do with being this sexist,
Speaker 1: and I'll prove it to you later. In that same game,
Speaker 1: there was an actress by the name of Anne Hathaway.
Speaker 1: She was shown on the screen. She was wearing the
Speaker 1: colors of the Philadelphia Eagles, and those Philly fans cheered her.
Speaker 1: That's right, they cheered a woman. They didn't boo her. Again,
Speaker 1: if they were all just sexist and massoninistic and another
Speaker 1: example of toxic masculinity, whatever crap the Left is throwing
Speaker 1: out this week, maybe that's my problem. Maybe I'm just
Speaker 1: a I'm suffering from toxic masculinity. Maybe that's why I
Speaker 1: pick on people like Jeremy England. Maybe that's the reason
Speaker 1: why I don't think there was anything harmful about booing
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift. If you're going to go to a football game,
Speaker 1: and I understand the Super Bowl's played on neutral site,
Speaker 1: but my understanding is the Eagles fan showed out for
Speaker 1: that game. My understanding having been to several football games
Speaker 1: my life, several times where I was walking into the
Speaker 1: opposing team stadium wearing the colors of the team that
Speaker 1: I wanted to root for, and I understood with that
Speaker 1: means you might get booed, you might get heckled a
Speaker 1: little bit. Try going to Tiger Stadium in Baton Rouge
Speaker 1: wearing the colors of the team taking on their beloved
Speaker 1: LSU Tigers. Try going to the Swamp wearing the colors
Speaker 1: of the opposing team going up against the Gators Ohio State.
Speaker 1: I can name multiple places where I know that if
Speaker 1: you walk into that stadium rooting for the opposing team,
Speaker 1: you're probably going to catch a little hell. It's just
Speaker 1: the nature of sports. Some of it, you hope, for
Speaker 1: the most part, is just good natured ribbing, but sometimes
Speaker 1: it might go a little below the belt, which put
Speaker 1: on your big boy bridges, and you just deal with
Speaker 1: it because you know you're an enemy territory, so you
Speaker 1: just put up with it. You deal with it, you
Speaker 1: move on, and if your team wins, well, if you're smart,
Speaker 1: you probably walk out of there acting like you've won
Speaker 1: a game before. That's all that was. But again, the
Speaker 1: Left always has to find an excuse and come up
Speaker 1: with another ism or phobia or whatever, because it can't
Speaker 1: just be because people are tired of Taylor Swift It
Speaker 1: can't just be because Taylor Swift is wearing the colors
Speaker 1: of the team that the most people in the stadium
Speaker 1: are rooting against. No, it can't be any of that.
Speaker 1: It must be what about I guarantee you some of
Speaker 1: those booths were probably coming from women too. Were they
Speaker 1: being sexist? Were they being misogynistic of a woman? Bood
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift here in the Super Bowl. Your argument's stupid.
Speaker 1: You probably already knew your argument was stupid when you
Speaker 1: wrote it, but you wrote it anyway because you don't
Speaker 1: care that your argument's not sound. You just care about
Speaker 1: writing more inflammatory, devisive nonsense because you probably have your
Speaker 1: own hatred. You probably just hate men. That's probably the
Speaker 1: real truth of the matter here. Ah See, now I've
Speaker 1: flipped your entire script on its head. Something tells me, though,
Speaker 1: I'm probably closer to the truth than you are. Guysince
Speaker 1: has been the right side radio program. Thank you for listening.
Speaker 1: A other week, we have gotten another flagship episode done
Speaker 1: for you guys this week. Again, we apologize that this
Speaker 1: one's a little bit shorter than the normal episodes, but
Speaker 1: we hope next week we'll be back for a full
Speaker 1: hour length episode. No promises, of course, but in the meantime, remember,
Speaker 1: if you've not already done so, like and subscribe to
Speaker 1: the Right Side Radio Program. Remember we're on iTunes, I
Speaker 1: Heart Radio, Spotify, Spreaker, Amazon Music, and so many more.
Speaker 1: If once you've subscribed to us, also leave us a
Speaker 1: five star review on your podcatcher of choice. Help the
Speaker 1: Right Side Radio Program grow. Guys, we really appreciate you listening.
Speaker 1: I've been your host, Jack Fairchilds. We'll see you again
Speaker 1: real soon. School